alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 30434 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Michael D. Gibbs,**
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:18

- CR

- 164

- 1

Before **Higginbotham, Higginson,** and **Duncan,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  *
The attorney appointed to represent Michael D. Gibbs has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gibbs has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 7, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-30434 Document: 00516227912 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/07/2022No. 21

- 30434

2 relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 21-30434 Document: 00516227912 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/07/2022
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**








I,
      Alexander Becker, Chief Executive Officer of Manas Petroleum Corporation (the
      "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1) the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,
      2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      August 17, 2007








/s/
      Alexander Becker


Alexander
      Becker


Chief
      Executive Officer
§ 502.37 Referral to Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) Upon receipt of a timely request for a hearing filed pursuant to and in accordance with § 501.33, the Administrator, WHD, by the Associate Solicitor for the Division of Fair Labor Standards or by the Regional Solicitor for the Region in which the action arose, shall, by *Order of Reference,* promptly refer a copy of the notice of administrative determination complained of, and the original or a duplicate copy of the request for hearing signed by the person requesting such hearing or by the authorized representative of such person, to the Chief Administrative Law Judge, for a determination in an administrative proceeding as provided herein. The notice of administrative determination and request for hearing shall be filed of record in the Office of the Chief Administrative Law Judge and shall, respectively, be given the effect of a complaint and answer thereto for purposes of the administrative proceeding, subject to any amendment that may be permitted under these regulations or 29 CFR part 18.
( b ) A copy of the *Order of Reference,* together with a copy of these regulations, shall be served by counsel for the Administrator, WHD upon the person requesting the hearing, in the manner provided in 29 CFR 18.3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001092479
<NAME> TRIAD HOSPITALS HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              18
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      277
<ALLOWANCES>                                       135
<INVENTORY>                                         33
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   372
<PP&E>                                           1,268
<DEPRECIATION>                                     568
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,335
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              130
<BONDS>                                            542
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,335
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   915
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      513
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   193
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    78
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  47
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     19
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (11)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  8
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         8
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24


</TABLE>
§ 519.14 Procedure for action upon an application. ( a ) Under certain conditions, an institution of higher education has temporary authorization to employ full-time students at subminimum wages. These conditions are: ( 1 ) Absence of an effective finding by the Secretary that the institution has been employing full-time students under certificates in violation of the requirements of section 14(b)(3) of the Act or of these regulations; and
( 2 ) Forwarding of a properly completed application to the Wage and Hour Division not later than the start of employment of full-time students at subminimum wages; and
( 3 ) Posting a notice of such filing at the place(s) specified in paragraph (a) of § 519.16 of this subpart; and
( 4 ) Compliance during the temporary authorization period with the requirements set forth in paragraphs (b) and (e) through (j) of § 519.16 of this subpart.
( b ) Temporary authorization under the conditions set forth in paragraph (a) of this section is effective from the date the application is forwarded to the Wage and Hour Division in conformance with § 519.13 of this subpart. This authorization shall continue in effect for one year from the date of forwarding of the application unless, within 30 days, the Administrator or his/her authorized representative denies the application, issues a certificate with modified terms and conditions, or expressly extends the 30-day period of review.
( c ) Upon receipt of an application for a certificate, the officer authorized to act upon such application shall issue a certificate if the terms and conditions specified in this subpart are satisfied. To the extent he/she deems appropriate, the authorized officer may provide an opportunity to other interested persons to present data, views, or argument on the application prior to granting or denying a certificate.
( d ) Until April 30, 1976, if a certificate is issued there shall be published in the Federal Register a general statement of the terms of such certificate together with a notice that, pursuant to § 519.19, for 45 days following such publication any interested person may file a written request for reconsideration or review. Thereafter, applications and certificates will be available for examination in accordance with applicable regulations in Washington, DC, and in the appropriate Regional Office of the Wage and Hour Division (or the Denver, Colorado Area Office for Colorado, North Dakota, and South Dakota; the Salt Lake City, Utah Area Office for Montana, Utah, and Wyoming; and the Caribbean Office for the area it covers) for institutions of higher education in its area. A period of 60 days will be provided after certificate issuance during which any interested person may file a written request for reconsideration or review.
( e ) If a certificate is denied, notice of such denial shall be sent to the employer, stating the reason or reasons for the denial. Such denial shall be without prejudice to the filing of any subsequent application.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 128 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 128

 To authorize testimony, document production, and legal representation 
in United States v. Philip G. Balcombe, Sansi G. Coonan, John S. Dear, 
 Jan Lustig, Michella A. Marusa, Martin J. Ryan, Eleanore M. Vouselas, 
                           and Bruno Keller.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 27, 2007

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize testimony, document production, and legal representation 
in United States v. Philip G. Balcombe, Sansi G. Coonan, John S. Dear, 
 Jan Lustig, Michella A. Marusa, Martin J. Ryan, Eleanore M. Vouselas, 
                           and Bruno Keller.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Philip G. Balcombe, Sansi G. Coonan, 
        John S. Dear, Jan Lustig, Michella A. Marusa, Martin J. Ryan, Eleanore 
        M. Vouselas, and Bruno Keller, Cr. No. 07-207, pending in federal 
        district court in Albuquerque, New Mexico, testimony and documents have 
        been requested from Maggie Murray, an employee in the office of Senator 
        Pete Domenici;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to 
        any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their official 
        responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That Maggie Murray and any other employees of Senator 
Domenici's office from whom testimony or the production of documents 
may be required are authorized to testify and produce documents in the 
case of United States v. Philip G. Balcombe, Sansi G. Coonan, John S. 
Dear, Jan Lustig, Michella A. Marusa, Martin J. Ryan, Eleanore M. 
Vouselas, and Bruno Keller, except concerning matters for which a 
privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent Maggie 
Murray and other employees of Senator Domenici's staff in the actions 
referenced in section one of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
#                 Book/Printed Material                Israel, spousal agreements for couples not belonging to any religion : a civil marriage option?
Exhibit 12.1THE LUBRIZOL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESComputation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges(all amounts except ratios are shown in millions)                       2005  2004  2003  2002  2001 Pretax income from continuingoperations $274.9  $142.7  $128.5  $180.9  $145.0                      Add (deduct) earnings of lessthan 50% owned affiliates(net of distributedearnings) included inpretax income  0.1   (0.8)  0.8   1.6   (0.6)                     Add losses of less than 50%owned affiliates includedin pretax income  —   —   0.2   —   2.1                      Add fixed charges net ofcapitalized interest  114.9   85.8   30.4   28.5   29.7                      Add previously capitalizedinterest amortized duringperiod  1.1   1.2   1.3   1.1   1.6                                      “Earnings” $391.0  $228.9  $161.2  $212.1  $177.8                                      Gross interest expenseincluding capitalizedinterest $105.8  $77.6  $25.3  $22.2  $24.1                      Interest portion of rental expense  9.8   8.8   5.3   5.2   4.7                                      “Fixed charges” $115.6  $86.4  $30.6  $27.4  $28.8                                      Ratio of earnings tofixed charges  3.38   2.65   5.27   7.74   6.17
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Technology roadmap : energyefficiency in existing homes**
 
Volumes: One | Two| Three
 
SuDoc Number:HH 14.2:P 27/
Item Number:0599-Q (online)
CGP systemNumber:000872762
 
April 2, 2018
## 2002 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

1-29-2002 

# B a nk s v . H or n

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al :
D ocke t 99-9005

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2002

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2002 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du

. 

## Re c omme nde d C it a t ion

" B a nk s v . H or n " (2002). 2002 D e cisio n s
. P ape r 62. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2002/62

### Filed January 29, 2002

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 99-9005

GEORGE E. BANKS, Appellant

v.
MARTIN HORN, Commissioner, PA Dept of Corrections; JAMES PRICE, Superintendent of State Correctional Institute Greene; RAYMOND J. COLLERAN, Superintendent of State Correctional Institute Waym art; COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil No. 99-cv-00438) District Judge: Honorable James F. McClure, Jr.
Argued April 2, 2001
Before: SLOVITER, ROTH and RENDELL, Circuit Ju dges

ORDER AMENDING OPINION
The slip opinion filed in the above case on October 31, 2001 is hereby amended as follows:
1. On page 4, third full paragraph, line 9, remove the word "equitably" .
2. On page 16, footnote 10, line 4, remove "And, in its brief, it quotes..." and replace with "And, in his brief, Banks quotes...".

### BY THE COURT,

/s/ Marjorie O. Rendell Circuit Judge
DATED: January 29, 2002

A True Copy: Teste:
Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

2
§ 501.37 Referral to Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) Upon receipt of a timely request for a hearing filed pursuant to and in accordance with § 501.33, the WHD Administrator, by the Associate Solicitor for the Division of Fair Labor Standards or the Regional Solicitor for the Region in which the action arose, will, by Order of Reference, promptly refer a copy of the notice of administrative determination complained of, and the original or a duplicate copy of the request for hearing signed by the person requesting such hearing or the authorized representative of such person, to the Chief ALJ, for a determination in an administrative proceeding as provided in this subpart. The notice of administrative determination and request for hearing shall be filed of record in the Office of the Chief Administrative Law Judge and shall, respectively, be given the effect of a complaint and answer thereto for purposes of the administrative proceeding, subject to any amendment that may be permitted under 29 CFR part 18 or this part.
( b ) A copy of the Order of Reference, together with a copy of this part, shall be served by counsel for the WHD Administrator upon the person requesting the hearing, in the manner provided in 29 CFR 18.3.
EXHIBIT 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C SECTION 1350
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Lescarden Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31,2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William E. Luther, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

   (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
        13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

   (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
        all material respects, the financial condition and result of
        operations of the Company.


          /s/ William E. Luther
              William E. Luther
              Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
              August 24, 2006
§ 520.203 What records does an employer have to keep when subminimum wage certificates are granted? How long do they have to be kept? ( a ) In addition to other records required under the recordkeeping requirements (part 516 of this chapter), the employer is required to keep records specific to certification under section 14(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act. All workers employed under a subminimum wage certificate shall be designated as such on the employer's payroll records. Further recordkeeping requirements are described in each applicable subpart of this part (see §§ 520.412 and 520.508 of this part).
( b ) Employers must maintain and preserve all required records for at least three years from the last date of employment under a subminimum wage program. The employer's copy of the application and the certificate shall also be maintained for three years. Such records shall be kept secure and accessible at the place of employment or where payroll records are customarily maintained. All records must be available for inspection and copying by the Administrator.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

United Airlines, Inc. 

Complainant, 

v. 

The Port Authority of New York 

and New Jersey 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER 

FAA Docket No. 16-14-13 

On April28, 2015, the FAA received the Respondent's Motion for Leave to File a Reply 

Memorandum of Points and Authorities to the Complainant's Answer to the 

Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment. On April27, 2015, the Director issued an 

Order denying the Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing the 

Complaint. 

ACCORDINGLY, it is ordered that the Respondent's Motion for Leave to File a Reply 

Memorandum of Points and Authorities is denied as moot. 

Randall S. Fiertz 

Director, Office of Airport 

CempliaBG€: ana Manag@m@Bt Analysis 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

HEREBY CERTIFY that on May_/, 2015, I caused to be placed in the United States mail 

(first class, postage paid) or personally delivered a true copy of the foregoing Order addressed 

to: 

Counsel for Respondent 

Carlene V. Mcintyre, Assistant General Counsel 

Arnold D. Kolikoff, Attorney 

Faith Tabafunda, Attorney 

Law Department 

THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY 

!50 Greenwich Street, 25th Floor 

New York, NY I 0006 

Counsel for Complainant 

Marc L. Warren, Esq. 

Keith J. Harrison, Esq. 

Gerald F. Murphy, Esq. 

Steven J. Seiden, Esq. 

CROWELL & MORING LLP 

1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Robert S. Span, Esq. 

Alan K. Steinbrecher, Esq. 

Sophy Chen, Esq. 

STEINBRECHER & SPAN LLP 

1155 F Street, N.W., Suite 1050 

Washington, DC 20004 

Hand-Delivered to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-600) 

FA A Office Gf A irpGrt CGmp!ianGe ana Managemelli: Aflalysis, AGO 1 00 

Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# TIME AND DATE: 

10 a.m. (EST). August 15, 2011.

# PLACE: 

4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Approval of the minutes of the July 18, 2011 Board member meeting

2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director

a. Monthly Participant Activity Report;

b. Monthly Investment Performance Review;

c. Legislative Report.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

Dated: August 4, 2011.

Thomas K. Emswiler,

General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-20232 Filed 8-5-11; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P