alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          42,021                  16,057
<SECURITIES>                                    12,487                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      783                   2,042
<ALLOWANCES>                                       170                      60
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   170                     604
<PP&E>                                           1,297                     632
<DEPRECIATION>                                     412                      28
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,733                  20,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,843                   4,113
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                  28,422
<COMMON>                                           101                      15
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,789               (122,667)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,733                  20,284
<SALES>                                          3,680                   2,172
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,680                   2,172
<CGS>                                          (3,395)                 (2,103)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (3,395)                 (2,103)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (8,493)                 (2,986)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,068                      46
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,140)                 (2,871)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        55                      56
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,195)                 (2,927)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.10)                  (2.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.10)                  (2.05)


</TABLE>
#### Satterfield v. Commonwealth.

(Decided June 3, 1915.)

Appeal.from Jefferson Circuit Court (Criminal Division).

Criminal Law — Indeterminate Sentence. — Under Section 1136 of the Kentucky Statutes, the jury and not the judge must fix the indeterminate sentence.

CLEM W. HUGGINS for appellant.

JAS. GARNETT, Attorney General; OVERTON S. HOGAN, Assist ant Attorney General, for appellee.

*217Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Reversing.

The judgment in this case must be reversed for error committed by the trial court in the application of the indeterminate sentence law of 1914, now section 1136 of the Kentucky Statutes. This section provides that the jury and not the court shall assess the punishment. In this case, under the instructions, the jury found the defendant guilty, and thereupon the court fixed his punishment at confinement in the county jail for four months, whereas, under the statute, the jury and not the court should have assessed the punishment.

It is proper to add that the trial judge was led to commit this mistake by an error occurring in the printed acts of 1914. In the indeterminate sentence law appearing in these acts, it is stated that the judge shall assess the punishmentwhen the defendant has been found guilty, while the enrolled bill shows that the jury must assess the punishment.

For the error in this respect the judgment is reversed, with directions for a new trial.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 1 

Informing the President of the United States that a quorum of each House 

is assembled. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Informing the President of the United States that a quorum 

of each House is assembled. 

1 Resolved, That a committee consisting of two Sen2 ators be appointed to join such committee as may be ap3 pointed by the House of Representatives to wait upon the 

4 President of the United States and inform him that a 

5 quorum of each House is assembled and that the Congress 

6 is ready to receive any communication he may be pleased 

7 to make. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.761 Training. The following provisions supplement the requirements of § 1926.21 regarding the hazards addressed in this subpart. ( a ) *Training personnel.* Training required by this section shall be provided by a qualified person(s).
( b ) *Fall hazard training.* The employer shall train each employee exposed to a fall hazard in accordance with the requirements of this section. The employer shall institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program. The program shall include training and instruction in the following areas: ( 1 ) The recognition and identification of fall hazards in the work area;
( 2 ) The use and operation of guardrail systems (including perimeter safety cable systems), personal fall arrest systems, positioning device systems, fall restraint systems, safety net systems, and other protection to be used;
( 3 ) The correct procedures for erecting, maintaining, disassembling, and inspecting the fall protection systems to be used;
( 4 ) The procedures to be followed to prevent falls to lower levels and through or into holes and openings in walking/working surfaces and walls; and
( 5 ) The fall protection requirements of this subpart.
( c ) *Special training programs.* In addition to the training required in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the employer shall provide special training to employees engaged in the following activities. ( 1 ) *Multiple lift rigging procedure.* The employer shall ensure that each employee who performs multiple lift rigging has been provided training in the following areas: ( i ) The nature of the hazards associated with multiple lifts; and
( ii ) The proper procedures and equipment to perform multiple lifts required by § 1926.753(e).
( 2 ) *Connector procedures.* The employer shall ensure that each connector has been provided training in the following areas: ( i ) The nature of the hazards associated with connecting; and
( ii ) The establishment, access, proper connecting techniques and work practices required by § 1926.756(c) and § 1926.760(b).
( 3 ) *Controlled Decking Zone Procedures.* Where CDZs are being used, the employer shall assure that each employee has been provided training in the following areas: ( i ) The nature of the hazards associated with work within a controlled decking zone; and
( ii ) The establishment, access, proper installation techniques and work practices required by § 1926.760(c) and § 1926.754(e).
[66 FR 5265, Jan. 18, 2001, as amended at 73 FR 75589, Dec. 12, 2008; 85 FR 8745, Feb. 18, 2020]
#### STATE ex WEST v HUDSON, etc.

Ohio Appeals, 4th Dist, Highland Co

Decided June 26, 1930

James J. West, Lafayette, in his own behalf.

Wilby G. Hyde, Chillicothe, for respondent.

BY THE COURT

The record in this .action establishes that there was no certificate of the fiscal officer of the incorporated village of Greenfield that the money required to meet the obligation made by the contract under which the relator herein claims the amount named in his petition was in the treasury of said village or in the process of collection to the credit of the fund from which the relator was to receive the salary named in the contract.

The express repeal of 3809 GC in the enactment of 5625-33 GC clearly establishes the intention of the legislature to abrogate all the exceptions to this requirement named in 3809 GC. The effect of this repeal, therefore, was to make 5625-33 GC a law of uniform application ,as to all the exceptions named in 3809 GC, including that of the contract under which the relator seeks to recover in this action. By the. further provisions of 5625-33 GC aforesaid the contract in this case, being without the required certificate, was void and no warrant may issue in payment of .any amount due thereon.

For the reason mentioned the petition is dismissed.

Middleton, PJ, Mauck and Blosser, JJ, concur.
#### § 1960.47 Results of investigations.

Each agency shall keep occupational safety and health committees advised of agency activity regarding allegations of reprisal and any agency determinations thereof. Agency officials shall provide copies of reprisal investigation findings, if any, to the Secretary and to the appropriate safety and health committee.
#### § 452.72 Period of inspection.

The Act specifies the maximum period during which the right of inspection of membership lists is to be granted. The opportunity to inspect the lists must be granted once during the 30-day period prior to the casting of ballots in the election. Thus, where a mail ballot system is employed under which ballots are returnable as soon as received by members, the right to inspect must be accorded within the 30-day period prior to the mailing of the ballots to members. It would be an unreasonable restriction to permit inspection of lists only after the ballots have been mailed or the balloting has commenced.
PUBLIC LAW 115–252—OCT. 3, 2018 132 STAT. 3181 

Public Law 115–252 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To require a land conveyance involving the Elkhorn Ranch and the White River 

National Forest in the State of Colorado, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Elkhorn Ranch and White River 

National Forest Conveyance Act of 2017’’. 

SEC. 2. LAND CONVEYANCE, ELKHORN RANCH AND WHITE RIVER 

NATIONAL FOREST, COLORADO. 

(a) LAND CONVEYANCE REQUIRED.—Consistent with the purpose 

of the Act of March 3, 1909 (43 U.S.C. 772), all right, title, and 

interest of the United States (subject to subsection (b)) in and 

to a parcel of land consisting of approximately 148 acres as generally 

depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Elkhorn Ranch Land Parcel–White 

River National Forest’’ and dated March 2015 shall be conveyed 

by patent to the Gordman-Leverich Partnership, a Colorado Limited 

Liability Partnership (in this section referred to as ‘‘GLP’’). 

(b) EXISTING RIGHTS.—The conveyance under subsection (a)— 

(1) is subject to the valid existing rights of the lessee 

of Federal oil and gas lease COC–75070 and any other valid 

existing rights; and 

(2) shall reserve to the United States the right to collect 

rent and royalty payments on the lease referred to in paragraph 

(1) for the duration of the lease. 

(c) EXISTING BOUNDARIES.—The conveyance under subsection 

(a) does not modify the exterior boundary of the White River 

National Forest or the boundaries of Sections 18 and 19 of Township 

7 South, Range 93 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado, as 

such boundaries are in effect on the date of the enactment of 

this Act. 

(d) TIME FOR CONVEYANCE; PAYMENT OF COSTS.—The conveyance directed under subsection (a) shall be completed not later 

than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. The 

conveyance shall be without consideration, except that all costs 

incurred by the Secretary of the Interior relating to any survey, 

platting, legal description, or other activities carried out to prepare 

Deadline. 

Elkhorn Ranch 

and White River 

National Forest 

Conveyance Act 

of 2017. 

Oct. 3, 2018 

[H.R. 698] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
132 STAT. 3182 PUBLIC LAW 115–252—OCT. 3, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 698 (S. 286): 

SENATE REPORTS: Nos. 115–69 and 115–92, accompanying S. 286, (both from 

Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 163 (2017): Feb. 6, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 164 (2018): Sept. 18, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

and issue the patent shall be paid by GLP to the Secretary prior 

to the land conveyance. 

Approved October 3, 2018. 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
§ 779.209 Vertical activities which are “related activities.” ( a ) The Senate Report also states (see § 779.206 that activities are “related” when they are “part of a vertical structure such as the manufacturing, warehousing, and retailing of a particular product or products.” Where such activities are performed through unified operation or common control for a common business purpose they will be regarded as a part of the enterprise.
( b ) Whether activities are vertically “related” activities and part of a single enterprise, or whether they constitute separate businesses are separate enterprises, depends upon the facts in each case. In all of these cases of so-called “vertical operations,” the determination whether the activities are “related,” depends upon the extent to which the various business activities, such as a wholesaling and retailing or manufacturing and retailing, are interrelated and interdependent and are performed to serve a business objective common to all. The mere fact that they are under common ownership is not, by itself, sufficient to bring them within the same enterprise. Thus, where a manufacturing business is carried on separately from and wholly independently of a retail business, with neither serving the business purpose of the other, they are separate businesses even if they are under common ownership. However, where the manufacturing operations are performed in substantial part for the purpose of distributing the goods through the retail stores, or the retail outlet serves to carry out a business purpose of the manufacturing plant, retailing and manufacturing will be “related” activities and performed for a “common business purpose,” and they will be a single enterprise if they are performed through unified operations or common control.
( c ) In these cases of “vertical operations” a practical judgment will be required to determine whether the activities are maintained and operated as separate and distinct businesses with different objectives or whether they, in fact, constitute a single integrated business enterprise. The answer necessarily will depend upon all the facts in each case.
§ 536.3 “Area of production” as used in section 13(b)(14) of the Fair Labor Standards Act. ( a ) An employee employed by an establishment commonly recognized as a country elevator and having not more than five employees (including such an establishment which sells products and services used in the operation of a farm) shall be regarded as employed within the “area of production,” within the meaning of section 13(b)(14) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, if the establishment by which he is employed is located in the open country or in a rural community and 95 percent of the agricultural commodities received by the establishment for storage or for market come from normal rural sources of supply within the following air-line distances from the establishment: ( 1 ) With respect to grain and soybeans—50 miles;
( 2 ) With respect to any other agricultural commodities—20 miles.
( b ) For the purpose of this section: ( 1 ) “Open country or rural community” shall not include any city, town, or urban place of 2,500 or greater population or any area within: ( i ) One air-line mile of the city, town, or urban place with a population of 2,500 up to by not including 50,000, or
( ii ) Three air-line miles of any city, town, or urban place with a population of 50,000 up to but not including 500,000, or
( iii ) Five air-line miles of any city with a population of 500,000 or greater, according to the latest available United States Census.
( 2 ) The commodities shall be considered to come from “normal rural sources of supply” within the specified distances from the establishment if they are received: ( i ) From farms within such specified distances, or
( ii ) from farm assemblers or other establishments through which the commodity customarily moves, which are within such specified distances and located in the open country or in a rural community, or
( iii ) from farm assemblers or other establishments not located in the open country or in a rural community provided it can be demonstrated that the commodities were produced on farms within such specified distances.
( 3 ) The period for determining whether 95 percent of the commodities are received from normal rural sources of supply shall be the last preceding calendar month in which operations were carried on for two workweeks or more, except that until such time as an establishment has operated for such a calendar month the period shall be the time during which it has been in operation.
( 4 ) The percentage of commodities received from normal rural sources of supply within the specified distances shall be determined by weight, volume or other physical unit of measure, except that dollar value shall be used if different commodities received in the establishment are customarily measured in physical units that are not comparable.
(Sec. 13(a) (17), 52 Stat. 1067, as amended, sec. 9, 75 Stat. 71; 29 U.S.C. 213 (a) (17))
[27 FR 400, Jan. 13, 1962, as amended at 71 FR 16666, Apr. 3, 2006]
Order entered December 21 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 01039
- CR
MOJICA ROMERO GIOVAN NI, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 11

Dallas County, Texas Tri al Court Cause No. MA15
- 57202
- N



### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effe ctive representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. Th is appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier. /s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 103 (Friday, May 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34245-34246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13232]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3255]


State of New Mexico

    As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on May 
13, 2000, and an amendment thereto on May 16, I find that the following 
Counties in the State of New Mexico constitute a disaster area due to 
damages caused by a severe forest fire beginning on May 5, 2000 and 
continuing: Bernalillo, Chaves, Cibola, DeBaca, Dona Ana, Eddy, 
Guadalupe, Lincoln, Los Alamos, McKinley, Mora, Otero, Rio Arriba, San 
Juan, San Miguel, Sandoval, Santa Fe, Sierra, Socorro, Taos, and 
Torrance. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of 
this disaster may be filed until the close of business on July 12, 
2000, and for loans for economic injury until the close of business on 
February 13, 2001 at the address listed below or other locally 
announced locations: U.S. Small

[[Page 34246]]

Business Administration, Disaster Area 3 Office, 4400 Amon Carter 
Blvd., Suite 102, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the following contiguous counties may be filed 
until the specified date at the above location: Catron, Colfax, Curry, 
Grant, Harding, Lea, Luna, Quay, Roosevelt, and Valencia Counties in 
New Mexico; Apache County, Arizona; Archuleta, Conejos, Costilla, La 
Plata, and Montezuma Counties in Colorado; San Juan County, Utah; and 
Culberson, El Paso, Hudspeth, Loving, and Reeves Counties in Texas.
    The interest rates are:

For Physical Damage

Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere: 7.375%
Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere: 3.687%
Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere: 8.000%
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit
Available Elsewhere: 4.000%
Others (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available 
Elsewhere: 6.750%

For Economic Injury

Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available 
Elsewhere: 4.000%

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 325505. 
For economic injury the numbers are 9H3800 for New Mexico, 9H3900 for 
Arizona, 9H4000 for Colorado, 9H4100 for Utah, and 9H4200 for Texas.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: May 18, 2000.
James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-13232 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### § 4903.16 How will PBGC refer debts owed to PBGC to private collection agencies?

PBGC will transfer delinquent debts owed to PBGC to the Financial Management Service to obtain debt collection services provided by private collection agencies. See § 4903.10 of this part.
#### § 408.12 Publication of reports required by this part.

Inspection and examination of any report or other document filed as required by this part, and the furnishing by the Office of Labor-Management Standards of copies thereof to any person requesting them, shall be governed by part 70 of this title.

[35 FR 2990, Feb. 13, 1970]
#### § 525.4 Patient workers.

With respect to patient workers, as defined in § 525.3(e), a major factor in determining if an employment relationship exists is whether the work performed is of any consequential economic benefit to the institution. Generally, work shall be considered to be of consequential economic benefit if it is of the type that workers without disabilities normally perform, in whole or in part in the institution or elsewhere. However, a patient does not become an employee if he or she merely performs personal housekeeping chores, such as maintaining his or her own quarters, or receives a token remuneration in connection with such services. It may also be possible for patients in family-like settings such as group homes to rotate or share household tasks or chores without becoming employees.
#### ESTHER MENDELSON v HARRY MENDELSON

Ohio Supreme Court

No 22197.

Decided Nov 19, 1930