alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 90 

To modify the application of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 

to Indian tribes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To modify the application of the Federal Election Campaign 

Act of 1971 to Indian tribes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF FECA TO INDIAN TRIBES. 

4 (a) CONTRIBUTIONS AND EXPENDITURES BY COR5 PORATIONS.—Section 316 of the Federal Election Cam6 paign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441b) is amended by adding 

7 at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(d) TREATMENT OF INDIAN TRIBES AS CORPORA9 TIONS.— 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 90 IS

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In this section, the term 

2 ‘corporation’ includes an unincorporated Indian 

3 tribe. 

4 ‘‘(2) TREATMENT OF MEMBERS AS STOCK5 HOLDERS.—In applying this subsection, a member 

6 of an unincorporated Indian tribe shall be treated in 

7 the same manner as a stockholder of a corpora8 tion.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any election that 

11 occurs after December 31, 2007. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
§ 500.265 Implementation by the Administrative Review Board. ( a ) Whenever, on the Administrative Review Board's (Board) own motion or upon acceptance of a party's petition, the Board believes that a Decision and Order may warrant modifying or vacating, the Board shall issue a Notice of Intent to modify or vacate.
( b ) The Notice of Intent to Modify or Vacate a Decision and Order shall specify the issue or issues to be considered, the form in which submission shall be made (*i.e.,* briefs, oral argument, etc.), and the time within which such presentation shall be submitted. The Board shall closely limit the time within which the briefs must be filed or oral presentations made, so as to avoid unreasonable delay.
( c ) The Notice of Intent shall be issued within thirty (30) days after the date of the Decision and Order in question.
( d ) Service of the Notice of Intent shall be made upon each party to the proceeding, and upon the Chief Administrative Law Judge, in accordance with 29 CFR part 26.
[86 FR 1786, Jan. 11, 2021]
(77 South. 1005)

#### WALDROP v. AUTOMOBILE SALES CO.

(6 Div. 410.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 29, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Tuscaloosa County; H. B. Foster, Judge.

H. L. Smith, of Tuscaloosa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
#### § 4002.2 Quorum.

Section 4002(d)(2) of ERISA establishes that a majority of the Board Members will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Any act of a majority of the Members present at any meeting at which there is a quorum will be the act of the Board.
#### § 32.1 Purpose.

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicap in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. The purpose of this part is to implement section 504 with respect to receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department of Labor.

[45 FR 66709, Oct. 7, 1980, as amended at 68 FR 51368, Aug. 26, 2003]
(75 South. 1005)

#### CHAPMAN v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM.

(6 Div. 315.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 19, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Wm. E. Port, Judge.

H. Alford, of Birmingham, for appellant. G. Lewis Bailes, of Birmingham, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
III 

Calendar No. 216 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 235 

Designating July 1, 2007, as ‘‘National Boating Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 14, 2007 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself and Mr. VITTER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JUNE 21, 2007 

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 1, 2007, as ‘‘National Boating Day’’. 

Whereas the United States boating population exceeds 

73,000,000 individuals utilizing and enjoying nearly 

18,000,000 recreational watercraft; 

Whereas the recreational boating industry provides more than 

$39,000,000,000 in sales and services to the United 

States economy and provides nearly 380,000 manufacturing jobs; 

Whereas there are approximately 1,400 active boat builders 

in the United States with parts and materials being contributed from all fifty States; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

SRES 235 RS 

Whereas boating appeals to all age groups and is a haven for 

relaxation that includes sailing, diving, fishing, water skiing, tubing, sightseeing, swimming, and more; 

Whereas boaters serve as monitors and stewards of the environment, educating future generations in the value of 

this country’s abundant water and other natural resources; and 

Whereas Congress passed the Federal Boat Safety Act of 

1971 and later created the Aquatic Resources Trust 

Fund in 1984, both of these actions having resulted in 

a decline in the rate of boating injuries: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates July 1, 2007, as ‘‘National Boat3 ing Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the value of recreational boating 

5 and commemorates the boating industry of the 

6 United States for its environmental stewardship and 

7 innumerable contributions to the economy and to the 

8 mental and physical health of those who enjoy boats; 

9 and 

10 (3) urges citizens, policy makers, and elected 

11 officials to celebrate National Boating Day and to 

12 become more aware of the overall contributions of 

13 boating to the lives of the people of the United 

14 States and to the Nation. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Calendar No. 216 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 235 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 1, 2007, as ‘‘National Boating 

Day’’. 

JUNE 21, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

P.O. Box 68727

Seattle, WA 98168

USA

Tele: (206) 787-5388

Fax: (206) 787-5912

www.portseattle.org

March 30, 2010

Docket DOT-OST-2010-0018

Ms. Dorothy Beard

Chief, Docket Operations, M-30

U.S. Department of Transportation

West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Letter of Support for Delta Air Lines’ Proposed Seattle-Haneda Route

Dear Ms. Beard:

Attached please find the Washington State Congressional Delegation letter in support of Delta Air Lines’ 

proposed Seattle-Haneda service.

Please contact me at 206 787 6857 or at ishiwata.k@portseattle.org if you have any questions.

Respectfully submitted,

Kazue Ishiwata

Senior Manager, Air Service Development

Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

Enclosures
§ 70.20 Responsibility for responding to requests. ( a ) *In general.* Except in the instances stated in paragraph (d) of this section, the component that first receives a request for a record and maintains that record is the component responsible for responding to the request. In determining which records are responsive to a request, a component ordinarily will include only records in its possession as of the date that the component begins the search; if any other date is used, the component will inform the requester of that date. A record that is excluded from the requirements of the FOIA pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(c), is not considered responsive to a request. When it is determined that records responsive to a request may be located in multiple components of the Department, the Office of Information Services may coordinate the Department's response. If the Office of Information Services deems a consolidated response appropriate, it will issue such a response on behalf of the Department.
( b ) *Authority to grant or deny requests.* Pursuant to relevant exemptions under 5 U.S.C. 552(b) or an exclusion under 5 U.S.C. 552(c), the head of a component, or designee, is authorized to grant or to deny any requests for records that are maintained by that component.
( c ) *Re-routing of misdirected requests.* Where a component's FOIA office determines that a request was misdirected within the Department, the receiving component's FOIA office will work with OIS to facilitate the routing of the request to the FOIA office of the proper component(s).
( d ) *Consultations and referrals.* When a component is reviewing records in response to a request, it will determine if another component of the Department, or of the Federal Government, is better able to determine whether the record can be disclosed or is exempt from disclosure under the FOIA. If the receiving component determines that it is not best able to process the record, then the receiving component will either: ( 1 ) Respond to the request after consulting with the component or agency best able to determine whether to disclose the record and with any other component or agency that has a substantial interest in the record; or
( 2 ) Refer the responsibility for responding to the request regarding that record to the component best able to determine whether to disclose it, or to another agency that originated the record (but only if that entity is subject to the FOIA). Ordinarily, the component or agency that originated the record will be presumed to be best able to determine whether to disclose it.
( e ) *Notice of referral.* Whenever a component refers all or any part of the responsibility for responding to a request to another component or agency, the component will notify the requester of the referral and inform the requester of the name of each component or agency to which the request has been referred and provide contact information for that component or agency.
( f ) *Classified records.* Any request for classified records which are in the custody of the Department of Labor will be referred to the classifying agency under paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Chief Financial
Officer of Siena Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that:

      (1)   The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
            June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
            Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


September 25, 2002                         By /s/ W. JOSEPH DRYER
                                             ----------------------------
                                                  W. Joseph Dryer
                                              Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I,  W. Joseph Dryer, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Siena Holdings,
            Inc.;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
            untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
            fact, necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
            circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
            with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
            information included in this annual report, fairly present, in all
            material respects, the financial condition, results of operations
            and cash flows of the registrant as of and for the periods presented
            in this annual report.

[Items 4, 5 and 6 omitted pursuant to the transition provisions of Release No.
34-46427.]


September 25, 2002                         By /s/ W. JOSEPH DRYER
                                             ----------------------------
                                                  W. Joseph Dryer
                                              Chief Financial Officer
Adams, Kevin (OST)

From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

fordJrank@gmail.com on behalf of Frank Ford-Pacific Wings <fford@pacificwings.com>

Friday, November 15, 2013 3:40 PM

Adams, Kevin (OSn

Devany, Dennis (OSn; Greg

Re: MUE Hold in request

MUE HOLD IN COMP 2013.pdf

Dennis & Kevin:

Attached is our hold in calculation for subsidy for Kamuela (MUE), Hawaii. Per my previous ~riiaill~a'-.-;·

various dockets, our hold in commenced 06/12/2013 (90 days after notice) until 09/2112013 when Mokulele

began service.

The calculations are in line with our CNM bid and costs structure etc ...

Please let me know if you have any questions and thanks in advance for expediting this matter.

Frank

'\

.,
Pacific Wings, L.L.C.

Provision for Essential Air Service at KAMUELA (MUE), HAWAII

KAHULUI (OGG) Service

Calculation of Annual Subsidy Needed

2 rountrips M-F, 1 roundtrip Saturday, 1 roundtrip Sunday

Aircraft type Cessna 208B

Seats per departure 9

Average completion factor: 98.0%

Departures 1,223

Block hours: 775

OGG - MUE

Other revenue

Total operating revenue

Passengers

1,000

Average fare

$88.10

Operating expense:

Flying Operations

Fuel and Oil

Aircraft and Hull Insurance

Maintenance

Into aircraft and lease expense

Direct Expense

Indirects

Total Operating Expense

Return at 5% of operating expense

Total Economic Cost

Annual Subsidy Need @ 98%

Appendix

Total

$88,100

441

$88,541

$116,189

$224,244

$82,000

$104,570

$152,076

$679,079

$182,556

$861,635

43,082

$904,717

$816.177
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 105 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 105

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 6063, an Act to authorize the 
programs of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and for 
other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make 
the following corrections:
    In section 601(b)(2)(A)(iii) of the bill, strike ``Orbiter''.
    In section 611(d)(1) of the bill, strike ``first President'' and 
insert ``President''.
    In section 611(e)(3) of the bill, strike ``correctly'' and insert 
``currently''.
    In section 611(e)(7) of the bill, strike ``extention'' and insert 
``extension''.
    In section 612 of the bill, strike ``operations'' and insert 
``operational''.
    In section 1119 of the bill, strike ``The Report'' and insert ``The 
report''.

            Passed the Senate October 1 (legislative day, September 
      17), 2008.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 105

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to correct the 
                        enrollment of H.R. 6063.
```
#### § 4003.33 Where to submit request for reconsideration.

A request for reconsideration must be submitted to the Director of the department within PBGC that issued the initial determination, except that a request for reconsideration of an initial determination described in § 4003.1(d)(2)(ii) must be submitted to the Director. See § 4000.4 of this chapter for information on where to file.

[61 FR 34012, July 1, 1996, as amended at 68 FR 61352, Oct. 28, 2003; 73 FR 38120, July 3, 2008; 85 FR 10284, Feb. 24, 2020]
CONSULTING AGREEMENT

                                  May 16, 2001


         Saratoga  Holdings  I,  Inc.  ("SHI")  a  Texas  Corporation,  by  this
agreement  agrees to pay the sum of  $10,000  per month for a period of not less
than twenty-four  months to Thomas F. Cooke  ("Cooke"),  Cooke agrees to provide
consulting  services  to the  company  that  shall  include  all  the day to day
administration of the company's  business,  the pursuit of new opportunities for
the company,  and to identify,  evaluate and consummate  merger and  acquisition
opportunities.

         The effective  date of the agreement is January 1, 2001 and  terminates
on January 1, 2003.

         Any and all  obligations  that have accrued at the  termination  of the
agreement shall bear interest at the rate of 10% per annum.

         SHI agrees that at the sole discretion of Cooke that any and all unpaid
balance due to Cooke may be converted to common stock of SHI at an exchange rate
of a fair market  price at the time of  conversion  determined  by a  qualified,
independent third party. In addition,  SHI will use its best efforts to register
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the United  States any shares
issued to Cooke pursuant to this agreement.

         Cooke agrees to defer any and all payment  under this  agreement  until
such time SHI has the financial  resources to fulfill its obligation  under this
agreement  or at which time Cooke  elects to convert  the  obligation  of SHI to
common stock of SHI pursuant to the agreement.

                                                  Sincerely,


                                                  Thomas F. Cooke
                                                  Saratoga Holdings I, Inc.
                                                  Chairman/CEO

Agreed and Accepted


Thomas F. Cooke
Individual
#### § 452.121 Limitations on national or international officers serving as delegates.

While officers of national or international labor organizations or of intermediate bodies who have been elected by a vote of the delegates to a convention may serve as delegates to conventions of their respective labor organizations if the constitution and bylaws so provide, they may not vote in officer elections at such conventions unless they have also been elected as delegates by a secret ballot vote of the members they are to represent. Of course, such officers may participate in the convention, i.e., they may preside over the convention, be nominated as candidates, or act in other capacities permitted under the organization's constitution and bylaws.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6083

IRVIN JEFFERSON WILSON,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM BYRAS, Director SCDC; MONICA WALLACE, 

Classification SCDC; B. LEWIS, Case Worker SCDC,

 Defendants – Appellees,

and

C. THOMPSON, Grievanor Co-Ord SCDC,

 Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. 

(4:11-cv-02837-MGL)

Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: July 5, 2013

Before DIAZ, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Irvin Jefferson Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox, 

II, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS PA, Florence, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Irvin Jefferson Wilson appeals the district court’s 

order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant 

summary judgment to the Defendants on Wilson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no due 

process violation, and thus no reversible error. Accordingly, 

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm

substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Jefferson v. Byras, No. 4:11-cv-02837-MGL (D.S.C. Jan. 14, 

2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Triad Hospitals, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Burke W. Whitman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Burke W. Whitman   
|Burke W. Whitman       
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 8, 2004       



This certification
shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.