alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bear Lake Recreation, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), We, Wayne Bassham, President and director and Todd
Albiston, Secretary/Treasurer of our Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

Dated: 11/5/2004                         /s/Wayne Bassham
      ----------                         ---------------------------
                                         Wayne Bassham
                                         President and director


Dated: 11/5/2004                         /s/Todd Albiston
      ----------                         ---------------------------
                                         Todd Albiston
                                         Secretary/Treasurer and director
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-159737, 333-156144, 333-153080, 333-118269, 333-118245, 333-88076, 333-53715, 333-87775, 333-87803, 333-49106, and 333-110243 on Form S-8 and 333-161050 on Form S-3 of our reportdated February 28, 2011, relating to the financial statements of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation and subsidiaries (which report expressed and unqualified opinion on those financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph regarding theCompany’s adoption of accounting guidance codified under Financial Accounting Standards Codification Topic (“ASC”) 860, “Transfers and Servicing” and ASC 810, “Consolidation” on January 1, 2010 and our reportdated February 28, 2011 relating to the effectiveness of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation for the yearended December 31, 2010. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Nashville, Tennessee 

February 28, 2011
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated April 9, 2015, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-202718) of Smart Trust, Defensive
50 Equities Trust, Series 3.


 


	 	/s/ Grant Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


April 9, 2015
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC UIT JANUARY 30 , 2006 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 10185 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D ocketN o. 02 -005 99 -C R -B -W U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s R A N D A L L B E V E L L E , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D i s tr i c to f A l ab a ma

_________________________ ( Jan u ar y 30, 2006) B ef ore B L A C K , C A RN E S and P R Y O R , C i rc ui tJudg es P E R C U R I A M: T here saA . T erre bo nn e, appo i nt ed coun se l for R andal l B evel l e i n thi s di re ct2

c r i m i na l appe a l , ha s m ove d t o w i thdr a w f r om f urthe rr e pr e s e nt a t i on of the ap p e lla n t a n d f

ile d ab r ie f

p u r s u a n t to A n d e r s v . C a lif o rn ia , 3 8 6 U .S . 7 3 8 , 8 7 S .C t. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L .E d .2 d 4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 ) . O u rin d e p e n d e n t r e v ie w o f th e e n tir e r e c o r d r e v e a ls th atco u n sel ’ s assessm en to f th e rel at i v e m eri to f th e ap p eal i s co rrect . B ecau se in d e p e n d e n t e x a m in a tio n o f th e e n tir e r e c o r d r e v e a ls n o a r g u ab le is s u e s o f m e r it, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , a nd B e ve l l e ’ s c onvi c t i on a nd sen t en ce i s A FFI R M ED .
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Albert H. Pleus, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of a21, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:





(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Date: September 15, 2004
      /s/ Albert H. PleusAlbert H. PleusChairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
§ 417.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Chief, DOE* means the Chief of the Division of Enforcement within the Office of Labor-Management Standards.
( b ) *Adequate procedure* shall mean any procedure which affords reasonable and equitable opportunity for (1) trial of an officer(s) charged with serious misconduct, and (2) removal of such an officer(s) if found guilty, and which contains the elements set forth in each of the subparagraphs of this paragraph: *Provided, however,* That any other procedure which provides otherwise reasonable and equitable measures for removal from office may also be considered adequate: ( 1 ) A reasonable opportunity is afforded for filing charges of serious misconduct against any elected officer(s) without being subject to retaliatory threats, coercion, or acts of intimidation.
( 2 ) The charges of serious misconduct are communicated to the accused officer(s), and reasonable notice is given the members of the organization, reasonably in advance of the time for hearing thereon.
( 3 ) Subject to reasonable restrictions, a fair and open hearing upon such charges is held after adequate notice and adequate opportunity is afforded for testimony or the submission of evidence in support of or in opposition to such charges. Within a reasonable time following such hearing, a decision is reached as to the guilt or innocence of the accused.
( 4 ) If the hearing upon such charges is held before a trial committee or other duly authorized body, reasonable notice of such body's findings is given to the membership of the organization promptly.
( 5 ) If such accused officer(s) is found guilty, he may be removed by a procedure which includes: ( i ) A secret ballot vote of the members at an appropriately called meeting, or
( ii ) A vote of a trial committee or other duly authorized body, subject to appeal and review by the members voting by a secret ballot at an appropriately called meeting.
( 6 ) Within a reasonable time after the charges of serious misconduct are filed with the labor organization final disposition (including appellate procedures) is made of the charges.
( c ) *Elected officer* means any constitutional officer, any person authorized to perform the functions of president, vice-president, secretary, treasurer, or other executive functions of a labor organization, and any member of its executive board or similar governing body.
( d ) *Cause shown* means substantial evidence of serious misconduct.
( e ) *Interested person* means any person or organization whose interests are or may be affected by a proceeding.
( f ) *Court* means the district court of the United States in the district in which the labor organization in question maintains its principal office.
[29 FR 8264, July 1, 1964, as amended at 29 FR 8480, July 7, 1964; 29 FR 9537, July 14, 1964; 50 FR 31310, Aug. 1, 1985; 62 FR 6093, Feb. 10, 1997; 63 FR 33779, June 19, 1998; 78 FR 8025, Feb. 5, 2013]
§ 38.80 Lack of jurisdiction. If CRC does not have jurisdiction over a complaint, the Director must: ( a ) Notify the complainant in writing and explain why the complaint falls outside the coverage of the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIOA or this part; and
( b ) Where possible, transfer the complaint to an appropriate Federal, State or local authority.
<PAGE>

                        ITEM 11 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
                               ITEM 402(a) (3)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                             Annual Compensation
               -----------------------------------------------
                           Long Term Compensation
                           ----------------------
 Name &                                       Other   Stock     Long Term     All
Principal                                     Annual  Options   Incentive    Other
Position       Year      Salary    Bonus(1)   Comp.   & Awards   Payouts     Comp(2)
---------      ----     --------  ---------   ------  --------  ---------    ------
<S>            <C>      <C>       <C>         <C>     <C>       <C>        <C>
Edward J.      1997     $240,000  $344,000     --        --        --           --
Hussey         1996      240,000   442,000     --        --        --           --
Chairman       1995      240,000   454,400     --        --        --           --
& President

Edward Jos     1997      114,400   258,640     --        --        --      $17,341
Hussey         1996      104,000   273,200     --        --        --       13,086
VP & Sec       1995       83,200   253,192     --        --        --        9,250

Michael F.     1997      114,400   258,640     --        --        --       17,341
Hussey         1996      104,000   273,200     --        --        --       13,086
VP -           1995       83,200   253,192     --        --        --        9,250
Finance

Marc A.        1997       68,900    56,340     --        --        --           --
Dosmann        1996       66,300    68,040     --        --        --           --
VP & CFO       1995       52,800    70,968     --        --        --           --

Bruce A.       1997       68,900    51,340     --        --        --           --
McMillan       1996       66,300    63,040     --        --        --           --
VP - Sales     1995       62,400    76,144     --        --        --           --
</TABLE>


                                      34
### Ground-water resources of the Middle Loup division of the lower Platte River basin, Nebraska, with a section on Chemical quality of the ground water

By: Delbert Wayne BrownFrank Hays Rainwater

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1258

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 102 (Thursday, May 25, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13147]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

41 CFR Part 102-36

[FPMR Amendment H-205]
RIN 3090-AF39


Disposition of Excess Personal Property; Correction

AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide Policy, GSA.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects an error contained in a final rule 
appearing in Part III of the Federal Register of Tuesday, May 16, 2000 
(64 FR 31218). The rule revised the Federal Property Management 
Regulations (FPMR) by moving coverage on the disposition of excess 
personal property into the Federal Management Regulation (FMR) and 
adding a cross-reference to the FPMR to direct readers to the coverage 
in the FMR.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 30, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martha Caswell, Director, Personal 
Property Management Policy Division (MTP), 202-501-3828.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In rule document 00-11921 beginning on page 
31218 in the issue of Tuesday, May 16, 2000, make the following 
correction:


Sec. 102-36.170  [Corrected]

    1. On page 31225, in the first column, in the second line, ``in'' 
should read ``is''.

    Dated: May 19, 2000.
Sharon A. Kiser,
Federal Acquisition Policy Division, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-13147 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-24-P
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > The Employment of Women in the Sewing Trades of Connecticut: Hours and Earnings, Employment Fluctuation, Home Work

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					,	Manning, Caroline, 1876-1966					 and 	Byrne, Harriet A. (Harriet Anne), 1892-. 						*The Employment of Women in the Sewing Trades of Connecticut: Hours and Earnings, Employment Fluctuation, Home Work : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 109*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1935,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5408,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of LCNB Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Stephen P. Wilson, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve P. Foster, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|/s/ Stephen P. Wilson                     |  | /s/ Steve P. Foster                    
|----------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Stephen P. Wilson
Chief Executive Officer |  | Steve P. Foster
Chief Financial Officer





Date: May 8, 2006
AVS

Quality Management

System

Title: Domestic Change Worksheet

Record of Contacts

FDMS Docket No. FAA_~20_IO--lo j I

QPM#

AIR-ANM-030-F4

Date: December 17, 2008

Revision

1

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA., ALPA,

etc.)?

Organization Person Contacted Date

ATA Joe While 8/1912009

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check the Master list to Verify That This is the Correct Revision Before Use
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 05-0479

IN RE  GRACO CHILDREN'S PRODUCTS, INC., NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relators’ motion for emergency relief, filed June 24, 2005, is granted.   The order dated June 29, 2005, in Cause No. C-1566-03-I, styled *Patricia Galnares, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Michael Anthony Glanares, deceased v. Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., Individually as D/B/A Graco Children's Products, Inc., et al.*, in the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, is stayed pending further order of this Court.

Done at the City of Austin, this July 14, 2005.

Andrew Weber, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
§ 2700.73 Procedure for intervention. After the Commission has directed a case for review, a person may move to intervene. A motion to intervene shall be filed within 30 days after the Commission's direction for review unless the Commission, for good cause shown, allows a later filing. Intervention before the Commission shall not be a matter of right but of the sound discretion of the Commission. The movant shall set forth: ( a ) A legally protectible interest directly relating to the property or events that are the subject of the case on review;
( b ) A showing that the disposition of the proceeding may impair or impede his ability to protect that interest;
( c ) The reasons why the movant's interest is not adequately represented by parties already involved in the proceeding; and
( d ) The reasons why the movant should be excused for failing to file for intervention before the Judge. A motion for intervention shall also show that the granting of the motion will not unduly delay the proceeding or prejudice any party and shall explain why the movant's participation as an amicus curiae would be inadequate. If the Commission permits intervention, the Commission's order shall specify the time within which the intervenor's brief and any response or reply may be filed. In denying a motion to intervene, the Commission may alternatively permit the movant to participate in the proceeding as amicus curiae.
1

John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.

NO. 07-04-0075-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

SEPTEMBER 19, 2005

______________________________

IN THE MATTER OF H.S., A MINOR CHILD

_________________________________

FROM THE 72ND DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY,

SITTING AS A JUVENILE COURT;

NO. 2003-760,673; HONORABLE MARK C. HALL, MAGISTRATE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS, JJ. and BOYD, S.J.1

ON JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL

Advocacy, Inc. perfected this appeal on behalf of appellant H.S. to challenge an

order finding H.S. mentally retarded and committing him to the Texas Department of Mental

Health and Mental Retardation. Pending before this Court is a motion to withdraw the

appeal by which the parties represent that H.S. has subsequently been moved to an

appropriate foster home and is doing well. The parties request that no further action be
2

taken in this matter to ensure H.S.’s current placement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2).

We grant the motion. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Don H. Reavis

 Justice
#### § 1955.47 Judicial review.

The State may obtain judicial review of a decision by the Secretary in accordance with section 18(g) of the Act.