alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 779.228 Types of arrangements contemplated by exception. If the retail or service establishment meets the requirements in paragraphs (a) through (c) of § 779.227, it may enter into the following arrangements without becoming a part of the larger enterprise, that is, without losing its status as a “separate and distinct enterprise” to which section 3(s) would not otherwise apply: ( a ) Any arrangement, whether by agreement, franchise or otherwise, that it will sell, or sell only certain goods specified by a particular manufacturer, distributor, or advertiser.
( b ) Any such arrangement that it will have the exclusive right to sell the goods or use the brand name of a manufacturer, distributor, or advertiser within a specified area.
( c ) Any such arrangement by which it will join with other similar retail or service establishments in the same industry for the purpose of collective purchasing. Where an agreement for “collective purchasing” is involved, further requirements are imposed, namely, that all of the other establishments joining in the agreement must be retail or service establishments under independent ownership, and that all of the establishments joining in the collective purchasing arrangement must be “in the same industry.” This has reference to such arrangements by a group of grocery stores, or by some other trade group in the retail industry.
( d ) Any arrangement whereby the establishment's premises are leased from a person who also leases premises to other retail or service establishments. In connection with this rental arrangement, the Senate Report cites as an example the retail establishment which rents its premises from a shopping center operator (S. Rept. 145, 87th Cong., 1st Sess., p. 41). It is clear that this exception was not intended to apply to the usual leased department in an establishment, which is specifically included within the larger enterprise under the definition of section 3(r). (See discussion under § 779.225.)
(78 South. 305)

#### METCALF v. STATE.

(6 Div. 482.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Feb. 26, 1918.)

1. Miscegenation <&wkey;5 — Evidence of Race.

That defendant, tried under Code 1907, § 7421, testified in the presence of court and jury, was enough to authorize finding that she was of the negro race.

2. Miscegenation &wkey;>l — Elements.

Conviction of defendant, a negress, under Code 1907, § 7421, is not authorized, there being no evidence that the man was White, or that they had lived together in the state of adultery or fornication.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County; C. P. Almon, Judge.

Ophelia Metcalf was convicted under Code 1907, § 7421, and appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

C. E. Mitchell, of Hamilton, for appellant. F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., and Emmett S. Thigpen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

BROWN, P. J.

[1, 2] The appellant was convicted of the offense denounced by section 7421 of the Code of 1907. On the trial, she testified as a witness in her own behalf, and was in the presence of the court and jury, and this was sufficient to authorize the finding that she was of the negro race. However, there was no evidence that Simmons was a white man, nor was there any evidence showing or tending to show that the appellant and Simmons had lived together in the state of adultery or fornication*.*

The court, on the evidence, erred in not directing a verdict for the defendant, on her request for the affirmative charge. Eman*390uel Dean v. State, ante, p. 367, 77 South. 979. Eor this error, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT R OB ER T JAM ES DEM ETRIOU, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. J.P. M OR G AN C HASE B A NK, N.A., De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 12-56657 D.C . No. 2:11-c v-05522-JFW VB K M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia John F. W a lte r, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d: De c e m

be r 9, 2015 ** B e fore : WALLAC E, R AW LINSON, a

n d IKUTA, C irc uit Judge s. R obe rt Ja m e s De m e triou a

ppe a ls pro sefrom

the distric t c ourt’ s sum

m ary judgm e nt in his dive

rsity a c t i on a rising from

fore c losure proc e e dings. W e have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo. K aplan v . C

i ty of N . Las Ve gas , 323 F.3d 1226, 1229 (9th C ir. 2003). W e a ffirm . 

# FIL ED DEC 16 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt be c a

use JP M orga

n C ha se B ank, N.A. ha d sta tutory a uthority to initia

te nonjudic ia l fore c losure proc e e dings. Se eC a l. C iv. C ode § 2924(a)(1) (a “ truste e , m ortga ge e , or be ne fic ia ry , or a ny of the i r a uthoriz e d a ge nts” m ay initia te the fore c losure proc e s s); se ealso J

e nk ins v . J P Morgan C

haseBank

, N .A. , 156 C a l. R

ptr. 3d 912, 928 (C t. App. 2013) (holding tha t a loa n se rvic e r, a s a ge nt for the be ne fic ia ry , m ay re c o rd a notic e of de fa

ult a nd initia te nonjudic ia l fore c losure ); Gome s v . C ountryw ideHome Loans, Inc . , 121 C a l. R ptr. 3d 819, 824 (C a l . C t. App. 2011) (C a lifornia

la w doe s not “

p rovidefor a

judic ia l a c tion to de t e rm i ne whe the r the pe rson initia

ting thefore c losure proc e ss is inde e d a uthoriz e d ” a

bse nt “ a spe c ific fac tual basisfor a l l e ging tha t the fore c l osure wa s not initia te d by the c orre c t pa rty ” ). W e do not c onside r De m e triou’ s judic ia l e stoppe l argum e nt be c a use it wa s ra ise d for the first tim e on a ppe a l. Se ePadge tt v . W

r ight , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009). Appe lle e ’ s unc onte ste d re que s t for judic ia l notic e , file d on June13, 2013, is grante d. AFFIRM E D .

1 2 - 5 6 6 5 7 2
§ 519.19 Reconsideration and review. ( a ) Within 15 days after being informed of a denial of an application for a full-time student certificate or within 45 days after Federal Register publication of a statement of the terms of the certificate granted, (subsequent to April 30, 1976, within 60 days after a certificate is granted), any person aggrieved by the action of an authorized officer in denying or granting a certificate may: ( 1 ) File a written request for reconsideration thereof by the authorized officer who made the decision in the first instance, or
( 2 ) File with the Administrator a written request for review.
( b ) A request for reconsideration shall be accompanied by a statement of the additional evidence which the applicant believes may materially affect the decision and a showing that there were reasonable grounds for failure to present such evidence in the original proceedings.
( c ) Any person aggrieved by the reconsideration of an authorized officer may, within 15 days after such determination, file with the Administrator a written request for review.
( d ) A request for review shall be granted where reasonable grounds for the review are set forth in the request.
( e ) If a request for reconsideration or review is granted, the authorized officer or the Administrator may, to the extent he/she deems it appropriate, afford other interested persons an opportunity to present data, views, or argument.
[40 FR 6329, Feb. 11, 1975; 40 FR 22546, May 23, 1975]
# Generalized Geologic Map

# SHZ Map Geologic Data Sources
Exhibit
32.2











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Visualant, Incorporated on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley E. Sparks, Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            the information contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations
of  the  Company.









/s/
Bradley E. Sparks


Bradley
E. Sparks


Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary-Treasurer









Date: May
19, 2009
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**UnitedStates Geological Survey in Alaska : organization and status of programs
 
1976 |1977 | 1978|
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.4/2:
Item Number:0620-a (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000137669
April 17, 2019
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the question of whether an instrument of equivalent scientific value, for the purposes for which the instrument shown below is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the United States. 

Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and be filed within 20 days with the Statutory Import Programs Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. Applications may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. 

*Docket Number:*                     00-010.                     *Applicant:*                     Tulane University, 6823 St. Charles Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70118-5698.                     *Instrument:*                     Electron Microscope, Model JEM-2010.                     *Manufacturer:*                     JEOL Ltd., Japan.                     *Intended Use:*                     The instrument is intended to be used for the study of microstructure of metals, metal oxide fibers, ceramics, semiconductors, composite materials, and geological samples. In these studies, the microscope is used to measure particle and crystal sizes and morphologies, crystalline structure and d-spacing of crystallographic planes, chemical composition and distribution, and number and extent of defects. In addition, the instrument will be used to train graduate students so that they will better understand the microscopy analysis of their samples.                     *Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs:*                     April 12, 2000.                 

Frank W. Creel,

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff. 

[FR Doc. 00-13320 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Order entered March 6, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00186-CV

IN RE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-13467

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### § 500.161 Audits.

The Secretary shall conduct audits as he deems necessary of the State plans, but on not less than an annual basis.
# EUR-Lex - 31998R0374 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998R0374

**Council Regulation (EC) No 374/98 of 12 February 1998 amending Articles 6 and 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1172/95 on the statistics relating to the trading of goods by the Community and its Member States with non-member countries **

*
Official Journal L 048 , 19/02/1998 P. 0006 - 0006 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 374/98 of 12 February 1998 amending Articles 6 and 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1172/95 on the statistics relating to the trading of goods by the Community and its Member States with non-member countries

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 113 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas following the amendment of the statistical territory of the Community on 1 January 1997 by Regulation (EC) No 476/97 (1) which amends Regulation (EC) No 1172/95 (2), the references to the former definition of the statistical territory are to be deleted; whereas Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1172/95 should therefore be amended;

Whereas from 1 January 1999 the country nomenclature currently used for the statistics relating to the trading of goods will be replaced by an alphabetical nomenclature based on the ISO alpha-2 code; whereas, in this new context and for the sake of harmonisation, all the Member States must use the same nomenclature when compiling statistics and transmitting them to Eurostat; whereas it is therefore necessary to amend Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1172/95 by deleting the possibility accorded the Member States of using other country nomenclatures at the collection stage,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 1172/95 shall be amended as follows:

1. in Article 6(1):

(a) in subparagraph (a), the second indent shall be deleted;

(b) in subparagraph (b), the third indent shall be deleted;

(c) subparagraph (c) shall be replaced by the following:

'(c) the goods referred to in Article 4(1), second subparagraph.`;

2. in Article 9:

(a) paragraph 2 shall be replaced by the following:

'2. The code specified in the nomenclature of countries referred to in paragraph 1 must be given for each country.`;

(b) paragraph 3 shall be deleted.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Article 1(2) shall apply from 1 January 1999.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 February 1998.

For the Council

The President

J. BATTLE

(1) OJ L 75, 15. 3. 1997, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 118, 25. 5. 1995, p. 10.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, Federal Voting Assistance Program, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense, Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness), Federal Voting Assistance Program, revised the SF 76, Federal Post Card Application (FPCA), SF 76A, Federal Post Card Application (Electronic), SF 186, Federal Write-in Absentee Ballot (FWAB), and SF 186A, Federal Write-in Absentee Ballot (Electronic), to meet Federal laws and technology, including but not limited to, the use of electronic transmission for transmitting the form. The form will be stocked by GSA, Federal Acquisition Service, Inventory Management Branch (QSDLBAB), 819 Taylor Street, Fort Worth, TX 76102-0000 and available November 1, 2011.

# DATES:

                        Effective upon publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 

Mr. John Godley, Department of Defense, 703-588-8108.

Dated: August 8, 2011.

Aaron Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2011-20421 Filed 8-10-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
§ 4050.204 Diligent search. ( a ) *Search requirement* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, a subpart B plan must, within the time frame described in paragraph (b) of this section, have diligently searched for each distributee of the plan whose location the plan does not know with reasonable certainty upon close-out in accordance with regulations and other applicable guidance issued by the Secretary of Labor under section 404 of ERISA.
( 2 ) *Notifying plans.* For a notifying plan, the requirement of paragraph (a)(1) of this section applies only to distributees identified in the filing with PBGC.
( b ) *Time frame.* A search for a missing distributee must be made within nine months before a filing is made under § 4050.205 identifying the distributee as a missing distributee.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0147

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ALEXANDER GARRETT LAFORGE, III,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 20, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 13 2023

09/13/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0147
#### § 779.104 Employees “engaged in the production of goods for commerce.”

The activities constituting “production” within the meaning of the phrase “engaged in * * * the production of goods for commerce” are defined in section 3(j) of the Act. (The statutory definition is set forth in § 779.13.) The handling or otherwise working on goods intended for shipment out of the State, directly or indirectly, in engagement in the “production” of goods for commerce. Thus, employees in retail stores who sell, pack, or otherwise work on goods which are to be shipped or delivered outside of the State are engaged in the production of goods for commerce. Typically, but not exclusively, employees engaged in the production of goods for interstate or foreign commerce, include those who work in manufacturing, processing and distributing establishments, including wholesale or retail establishments, that produce goods for interstate or foreign commerce. This includes everyone, including office, management, sales and shipping personnel, and maintenance, custodial and protective employees, whether they are employed by the producer or an intermediary. Employees may be covered even if their employer does not ship his goods directly in such commerce. The goods may leave the State through another firm. The workers may produce goods which become a part or ingredient of goods shipped in interstate or foreign commerce by another firm. Also covered are workers who are engaged in a closely related process or occupation directly essential to such production. (See § 779.105.)
#### § 458.74 Conduct of hearing.

Hearings shall be conducted by an Administrative Law Judge and shall be open to the public unless otherwise ordered by the Administrative Law Judge.