alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 541.700 Primary duty. ( a ) To qualify for exemption under this part, an employee's “primary duty” must be the performance of exempt work. The term “primary duty” means the principal, main, major or most important duty that the employee performs. Determination of an employee's primary duty must be based on all the facts in a particular case, with the major emphasis on the character of the employee's job as a whole. Factors to consider when determining the primary duty of an employee include, but are not limited to, the relative importance of the exempt duties as compared with other types of duties; the amount of time spent performing exempt work; the employee's relative freedom from direct supervision; and the relationship between the employee's salary and the wages paid to other employees for the kind of nonexempt work performed by the employee.
( b ) The amount of time spent performing exempt work can be a useful guide in determining whether exempt work is the primary duty of an employee. Thus, employees who spend more than 50 percent of their time performing exempt work will generally satisfy the primary duty requirement. Time alone, however, is not the sole test, and nothing in this section requires that exempt employees spend more than 50 percent of their time performing exempt work. Employees who do not spend more than 50 percent of their time performing exempt duties may nonetheless meet the primary duty requirement if the other factors support such a conclusion.
( c ) Thus, for example, assistant managers in a retail establishment who perform exempt executive work such as supervising and directing the work of other employees, ordering merchandise, managing the budget and authorizing payment of bills may have management as their primary duty even if the assistant managers spend more than 50 percent of the time performing nonexempt work such as running the cash register. However, if such assistant managers are closely supervised and earn little more than the nonexempt employees, the assistant managers generally would not satisfy the primary duty requirement.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: August 25 , 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

– 2013
- 0602 FROM: Anna Phillips , EPA/OI TA SUBJECT: August 25 , 2014 Meeting Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing

Power Plants
**SUMMARY** A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on August 25 , 2014 to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

. The Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2 , 2014
. **AT TENDEES**  Delegation from German Bundestag (Federal Parliament) Committee on Environment, Nature Protection, Building and Nuclear Safety: Bärbel Höhn, Committee Chairwoman and Head of Delegation Artur Auernhammer, Deputy Chairman Oliver Grundmann, Member of Parliament Sylvia Jörrißen, Member of Parliament Klaus Mindrup , Member of Parliament Michael Thews, Member of Parliament Hubertus Zdebel, Member of Parliament Elmar Ostermann, Committee Staff Joerg Kinnen, German Embassy Michael Weber, German Embassy
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Kathleen M. Jepson, certify that:

l.	I have reviewed this Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this amended report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	[Intentionally omitted]

(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 9, 2005.

/S/ Kathleen M. Jepson
Kathleen M. Jepson
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The  undersigned  executive  officers  of 1st  State  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Registrant")  hereby  certify that this  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements
of  Section  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  and the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.






                     By: /s/ James C. McGill
                         -------------------------------------------------------
                         Name:  James C. McGill
                         Title: President and Chief Executive Officer



                     By: /s/ A. Christine Baker
                         -------------------------------------------------------
                         Name:  A. Christine Baker
                         Title: Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer


Date: August 11, 2005
#### § 4047.1 Purpose and scope.

Section 4047 of ERISA gives the PBGC broad authority to take any necessary actions in furtherance of a plan restoration order issued pursuant to section 4047. This part (along with Treasury regulation 26 CFR 1.412(c)(1)-3) describes certain legal obligations that arise incidental to a plan restoration under section 4047. This part also establishes procedures with respect to these obligations that are intended to facilitate the orderly transition of a restored plan from terminated (or terminating) status to ongoing status, and to help ensure that the restored plan will continue to be ongoing consistent with the best interests of the plan's participants and beneficiaries and the single-employer insurance program. This part applies to terminated and terminating single-employer plans (except for plans terminated and terminating under ERISA section 4041(b)) with respect to which the PBGC has issued or is issuing a plan restoration order pursuant to ERISA section 4047.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > The Nonworking Time of Industrial Women Workers: Study by Students of the Hudson Shore Labor School Under the Direction of Juliet Fisher, July 1940

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*The Nonworking Time of Industrial Women Workers: Study by Students of the Hudson Shore Labor School Under the Direction of Juliet Fisher, July 1940 : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 181*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1940,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5454,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
(77 South. 1004)

#### MELVIN et al. v. MURPHY.

(1 Div. 265.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 15, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Monroe County; Ben D. Turner, Judge.

Charles L. Hybart, of Monroeville, for appellants. Barnett, Bugg & Lee, of Monroeville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed for want of prosecution.
[No. 27149-4-II.

Division Two.

December 31, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Larry Lee Bruner, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 00-1-01280-2, Roger A. Bennett, J., entered March 23, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J., concurred in by Morgan and Bridgewater, JJ.
§ 4041.29 Post-distribution certification. ( a ) *Filing requirement.* The plan administrator must either— ( 1 ) Within 30 days after the last distribution date for any affected party, file with PBGC a post-distribution certification (PBGC Form 501), completed in accordance with the instructions thereto; or
( 2 ) ( i ) Within 30 days after the last distribution date for any affected party, certify to PBGC, in the manner prescribed in the instructions to PBGC Form 501, that the plan assets have been distributed as required, and
( ii ) Within 60 days after the last distribution date for any affected party, file a post-distribution certification (PBGC Form 501), completed in accordance with the instructions thereto.
( b ) *Assessment of penalties.* PBGC will assess a penalty for a late filing under paragraph (a) of this section only if the required information is filed more than 90 days after the distribution deadline (including extensions) under § 4041.28(a).
[85 FR 6060, Feb. 4, 2020]
§ 531.50 Statutory provisions with respect to tipped employees. ( a ) With respect to tipped employees, section 3(m)(2)(A) provides that, in determining the wage an employer is required to pay a tipped employee, the amount paid such employee by the employee's employer shall be an amount equal to— ( 1 ) The cash wage paid such employee which for purposes of such determination shall not be less than the cash wage required to be paid such an employee on August 20, 1996 [*i.e.,* $2.13]; and
( 2 ) An additional amount on account of the tips received by such employee which amount is equal to the difference between the wage specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section and section 6(a)(1) of the Act.
( b ) Section 3(m)(2)(A) also provides that an employer that takes a tip credit against its minimum wage obligations to its tipped employees must inform those employees of the provisions of that subsection, and that the employees must retain all of their tips, although the employer may require those employees to participate in a tip pool with other tipped employees that customarily and regularly receive tips.
( c ) Section 3(m)(2)(B) provides that an employer may not keep tips received by its employees for any purposes, including allowing managers and supervisors to keep any portion of employees' tips, regardless of whether the employer takes a tip credit under section 3(m)(2)(A).
( d ) “Tipped employee” is defined in section 3(t) of the Act as any employee engaged in an occupation in which he or she customarily and regularly receives more than $30 a month in tips.
[85 FR 86789, Dec. 30, 2020]
791 A.2d 1176

#### Barbara J. ERNSBERGER, Appellant v. ALLEGHENY 2000 CITIZENS COMMITTEE, INC., Brabender Cox Political Inc., David Matter, John Brabender, John Verbanac and James Turner, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued March 4, 2002.

Decided March 22, 2002.

*76Michael Rosenfield, Pittsburgh, for appellant, Barbara J. Emsberger.

Perry Anthony Napolitano, Pittsburgh, for appellee, Allegheny 2000 Citizens Committee, Inc.

Heather S. Heidelbaugh, Eugene A. Giotto, Joseph Sabino Mistick, Pittsburgh, for appellee, David Matter.

Timothy Joseph Burdette, Pittsburgh, for appellee, James Turner.

Albert P. Caruso, Pittsburgh, for appellees, Brabender Cox Political, John Brabender and John Verbanac.

Before ZAPPALA, C.J., and CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR and EAKIN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.
(77 South. 1003)

#### DAWSON v. STATE.

(6 Div. 393.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Dec. 18, 1917.)

Appeal from "Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Romaine Boyd, Judge.

W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
As of December 31, 2000


Mr. Burton G. Friedlander
Friedlander Capital Management Corp.
104 Field Point Rd.
Greenwich, CT  06830

         Re:      eNote.com Inc. (the 'Company')

Dear Burt:

     The purpose of this letter is to confirm  the  agreement  of the Company to
adjust the exercise price of the Warrants listed below to $.18 in  consideration
of your  agreement  to  provide  funding  to the  Company  as set  forth  in the
Subscription Agreement dated as of December 31, 2000 between Friedlander Capital
Management Corp. and the Company.

         Warrant No. 1-A dated August 17, 2000
         Warrant No. 3-A dated September 11, 2000
         Warrant No. 4-A dated October 12, 2000
         Warrant No. 5-A dated October 26, 2000
         Warrant No. 6-A dated November 9, 2000
         Warrant No. 7-A dated November 22, 2000
         Warrant No. 8-A dated December 7, 2000
         Warrant No. 9-A dated December 20, 2000


                                                     Very truly yours,


                                                     ENOTE.COM INC.

                                                     By:/s/ Michael T. Grennan


Acknowledged and Agreed
FRIEDLANDER CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORP.

By:/s/ Burton G. Friedlander
November 16, 2015

Attn:

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

RE: STEVEN LIGHTCAP REQUEST AN EXEMPTION FROM THE 

REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE

OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING 

COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI Phantom 3 and Blade 350 QX3 UNMANNED 

AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA

MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112-95)

Addendum- I would like to add the following UAS to my exemption, DJI INSPIRE ONE, 

DJI S900, DJI S1000. To be included with my original UAS's DJI PHANTOM 3, and 

BLADE 350QX3. 

These UAS's will be used for Aerial Photography and Videography, Inspection and 

Patrolling, Agriculture Documenting, Wildlife and Forestry Monitoring, Surveying, 

Search and Rescue, Disaster and catastrophe events, Motion Picture Filming, Aerial 

Imaging/Mapping, Cinematography, Roof Inspections.

All of the rules set by the FAA will be followed with extreme precaution to the safety of 

the public. All pre-flight checklist will be excuted. All UAS's will be used in accordance 

with the FAA rules and regulations. Thank you for your time and please call me with any 

questions.

Steven Lightcap Jr - Operator

11532 Crescent Pines Blvd.

Clermont, FL 34711

352-267-9132

stevelightcap@yahoo.com

1
Exhibit 99


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust VI (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding VI, L.P. (the
"Partnership")  for the period ended June 28, 2002 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, John C. Stomber,
Regular  Trustee of the Trust and Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Merrill
Lynch & Co., Inc., the General Partner of the Partnership,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust
    and the Partnership.




                   MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST VI



                   By: /s/ John C. Stomber
                   --------------------------------------------
                   Name: John C. Stomber*
                   Title: Regular Trustee




                   MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING VI, L.P.


                   By: MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner



                   By: /s/ John C. Stomber
                   --------------------------------------------
                   Name: John C. Stomber*
                   Title: Senior Vice President and Treasurer


Dated: August 9, 2002

___________________________
* John C. Stomber functions as the equivalent of the chief executive officer and
chief financial officer of each of the Trust and the Partnership for purposes of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 157 

Extending the best wishes of the Senate to New Jersey Governor Jon S. 

Corzine and expressing the Senate’s hope for his speedy and complete 

recovery. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 18, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. 

ALEXANDER, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. BAYH, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. 

BIDEN, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. BOND, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BROWN, Mr. 

BROWNBACK, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. BURR, Mr. BYRD, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. 

CARDIN, Mr. CARPER, Mr. CASEY, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. 

COBURN, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. COLEMAN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. 

CORKER, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. DODD, 

Mrs. DOLE, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. 

ENZI, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. GRASSLEY, 

Mr. GREGG, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. HATCH, Mrs. HUTCHISON, 

Mr. INHOFE, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. KENNEDY, 

Mr. KERRY, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. KOHL, Mr. KYL, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. 

LEAHY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. LOTT, Mr. 

LUGAR, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. MCCAIN, Mrs. MCCASKILL, Mr. MCCONNELL, Ms. MIKULSKI, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. NELSON of 

Florida, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. REED, 

Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. 

SCHUMER, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. SMITH, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. 

SPECTER, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. SUNUNU, Mr. TESTER, 

Mr. THOMAS, Mr. THUNE, Mr. VITTER, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. WARNER, 

Mr. WEBB, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, and Mr. WYDEN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Extending the best wishes of the Senate to New Jersey 


ccoleman on PRODPC74 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 157 ATS 

Governor Jon S. Corzine and expressing the Senate’s 

hope for his speedy and complete recovery. 

Whereas The Honorable Jon S. Corzine, the Governor of the 

State of New Jersey, served with distinction in the 

United States Senate from January 3, 2001, to January 

17, 2006; 

Whereas, during his time in the Senate, Governor Corzine 

made many friends in both political parties; 

Whereas, on April 12, 2007, Governor Corzine was seriously 

injured in a major traffic accident; 

Whereas Governor Corzine is in critical but stable condition 

in the Trauma Intensive Care Unit at Cooper University 

Hospital in Camden, New Jersey; and 

Whereas Governor Corzine’s many friends in the Senate are 

deeply concerned about the Governor and have had him 

in their thoughts since the tragic accident occurred: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate extends its best wishes to 

2 New Jersey Governor Jon S. Corzine and hopes for his 

3 speedy and complete recovery. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC74 with BILLS