V1 Furnace 

NAIMA / U.S. EPA 

Emissions Test Report 

Prepared for: 

Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC 

Waxahachie, Texas 

Waxahachie Plant 

3700 North Interstate 35 E 

Waxahachie, Texas 75165 

BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 

December 27, 2010 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 

2615 Wolcott Street 

Ferndale, Michigan 48220 

(248) 548-8070 
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 27, 2010 

i

Executive Summary

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) 

and its members to a voluntary collection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production1

 as well as for 

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing2. To assist in collected the agreed upon data, 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates 

of the following pollutants from the V-1 Oxy-Fuel Glass Melter Furnace process exhaust stack 

located at the Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC (Owens Corning) site in Waxahachie, 

Texas: 

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) 

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and 

selenium 

• Mercury 

• Hexavalent chromium 

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and 

NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. Table I on the following page summarizes the 

overall results of the emissions test program. 

 

1

 Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD) 2

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 27, 2010 

ii

Table I 

Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Test Date(s) Pollutant MDL 

used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour)

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM2.5 1.3E-01 2.8E-02 3.3E+00 

Organic 

Condensible 

PM2.5

< 2.1E-02 4.5E-03 5.3E-01 

Inorganic 

Condensible 

PM2.5

 1.8E+00 3.8E-01 4.5E+01 

August 17 & 

18, 2010 

Total PM2.5 1.9E+00 4.1E-01 4.9E+01 

Filterable 

Particulate 6.0E-02 1.2E-02 1.7E+00 

Antimony < 1.9E-05 3.9E-06 5.5E-04 

Arsenic 2.7E-05 6.0E-06 8.5E-04 

Beryllium < 4.8E-06 9.7E-07 1.4E-04 

Cadmium 1.1E-05 3.9E-06 5.5E-04 

Chromium 2.7E-04 5.3E-05 7.6E-03 

Cobalt < 4.8E-06 9.7E-07 1.4E-04 

Lead 3.7E-05 7.4E-06 1.0E-03 

Manganese 3.8E-05 7.5E-06 1.1E-03 

Nickel < 2.8E-05 5.7E-06 8.1E-04 

August 18 & 

19, 2010 

Selenium 3.0E-03 6.1E-04 8.7E-02 

October 21 & 

22, 2010 Mercury 2.3E-05 4.6E-06 6.9E-04 

August 18 & 

19, 2010 

Hexavalent 

Chromium 1.5E-04 2.9E-05 4.0E-03 

Hydrogen 

Chloride < 8.7E-03 1.8E-03 2.5E-01 August 18, 

2010 Hydrogen 

Fluoride 6.2E-02 1.3E-02 1.8E+00 

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions.
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 27, 2010 

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 2

2.1 PROCESS MONITORING ....................................................................................................... 2 

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............................................. 2

3.1 EXHAUST GAS VELOCITY, MOLECULAR WEIGHT, AND MOISTURE CONTENT .................... 2 

3.2 PM AND PM2.5 CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................................... 3 

3.3 TOTAL SELECTED METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................ 3 

3.4 HG CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES..................................................................... 4 

3.5 HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................. 4 

3.6 HF AND HCL CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES..................................................... 4 

4.0 TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 5

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel 

Table 2 – Emissions Test Program Summary 

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram 

Figure 2 – Method 3 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 3 – OTM 27/OTM 28 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 4 – Method 29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 5 – Method 30B Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 6 – Method 0061 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 7 – Method 26A Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Detailed Test Run Results 

Appendix B – Production Data 

Appendix C – Field and Computer-Generated Data Sheets and Notes 

Appendix D – Equipment Calibration Documents 

Appendix E – Laboratory Analytical Reports 

Appendix F – Initial Test Program Hg Test Results and Documentation 
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 27, 2010 

1

1.0 Introduction 

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) 

and its members to a voluntary collection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production3

 as well as for 

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing4. To assist in collected the agreed upon data, 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates 

of the following pollutants from the V-1 Oxy-Fuel Glass Melter Furnace process exhaust stack 

located at the Owens Corning Insulating Systems, Inc. (Owens Corning) site in Waxahachie, 

Texas: 

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) 

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and 

selenium 

• Mercury 

• Hexavalent chromium 

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and 

NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. The emissions test program was conducted on 

August 17, 18, and 19, 2010 with re-testing for mercury emissions on October 21 and 22, 2010. 

Mercury testing was conducted a second time because of unacceptable quality assurance results 

for the initial mercury testing conducted on August 17 and 18, 2010. Results reported in this test 

report reflect the mercury testing conducted on October 21 and 22, 2010. All documents relevant 

to the mercury testing conducted on August 17 and 18, 2010 are included in Appendix F. 

All testing was conducted by METCO Environmental of Carrollton, Texas. The test program 

consisted of triplicate emission tests at each location for each parameter. The field sampling 

portion of the emissions test program included the personnel summarized by Table 1.

Table 1 

Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation 

Shane Lee METCO 

Troy Gayer METCO 

John Cutaia METCO 

Matt Gillen METCO 

Michael Meadows METCO 

Rick Cooper Owens Corning 

Dave Jacobs Owens Corning 

 

3

 Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD) 4

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 27, 2010 

2

2.0 Process Description

The V-1 Furnace is a gas-fired, oxy-fuel furnace which supplies energy to the mixed glass batch 

via a combination of radiant, conductive and convective heating from a set of side wall burners 

fired with natural gas and oxygen whose hot combustion products flow over the top of the batch. 

The furnace is equipped with a dry electrostatic precipitator (DEP) to control particulate 

emissions that are created from batch charging and glass volatiles that “boil” from the surface of 

the molten glass condensing in the exhaust stream forming small diameter particulate matter. 

The V-1 Furnace exhausts to a single, ground-mounted exhaust stack. The stack is round and 36 

inches in diameter. The two stack test ports are 4 inches in diameter located approximately 40 

feet above ground level. The Owens Corning facility in Waxahachie is located 3700 North 

Interstate 35 E in Waxahachie, Texas. 

2.1 Process Monitoring 

During the emissions test program, V-1 Melter Furnace was operated under normal conditions. 

In addition to total production (glass pull rate) for each test run, process operating data recorded 

(every quarter hour) during the emissions test program included (1) inlet temperature, (2) oxygen 

purity, and (3) voltage readings for systems monitoring equipment. Process production data is 

available in Appendix B. Additional process monitoring and control equipment data will be 

available to U.S. EPA on request. 

3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies 

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emissions test program can be separated into six 

categories as follows: 

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content; 

(2) Measurement of exhaust gas PM and PM2.5 concentrations and emission rates; 

(3) Measurement of exhaust gas total selected metals concentrations and emission rates; 

(4) Measurement of exhaust gas Hg concentrations and emission rates; 

(5) Measurement of exhaust gas hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates; 

and, 

(6) Measurement of exhaust gas HF and HCl concentrations and emission rates. 

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologies by category are summarized by Sections 

3.1 through 3.6, respectively. 

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moisture Content 

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content was conducted 

using the following reference test methods codified at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code 

of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A): 

• Method 1 - “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points” 
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 27, 2010 

3

• Method 2 - “Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flowrate” 

• Method 3 - “Gas Analysis for the Determination of Dry Molecular 

Weight”

• Method 4 - “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

These test methods were used to evaluate exhaust gas flowrates either in conjunction with the 

isokinetic sampling methodologies used to evaluate some pollutant emission rates or as separate, 

discrete measurements conducted in support of the non-isokinetic sampling methodologies. 

Stack gas velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in 

Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figure 1 for a traverse location drawing). An S-type pitot tube with 

a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accordance with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used to 

measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each location 

during testing. The S-type pitot tube was calibrated to a dimensionless value. 

Exhaust gas O2 and CO2 content of the exhaust gas was determined using the Orsat analysis 

procedures of Method 3 (see figure 2). Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated using 

Method 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was determined volumetrically (liquid impingers) and 

gravimetrically (silica gel impinger).

3.2 PM and PM2.5 Concentrations and Emission Rates 

PM/PM2.5 concentrations and emission rates were measured using U.S. EPA Other Test 

Methods (OTM) 27 and OTM 28. PM, PM2.5, and CPM concentrations and emission rates were 

measured using a Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This system 

will consisted of (1) a tapered nozzle, (2) a PM10 particle sizer cyclone followed by a PM2.5

particle sizer cyclone, (3) a glass or quartz fiber filter assembly and heated probe, (4) a glass 

recirculating ice water condenser system, (5) a set of four GS impingers, (6) a length of sample 

line, and (7) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated 

orifice. Prior to each test, the second and third impingers were filled with 100 ml of HPLC 

water, the first and fourth impingers were empty, and the fifth impinger contained 

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the PM2.5/CPM sample 

train is provided as Figure 3. The total filterable PM faction was collected on the front half of 

the M29 Metals sampling train as per the QAPP. 

3.3 Total Selected Metals Concentrations and Emission Rates

Total selected metals concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 29. Selected metals concentrations and emission rates were 

measured using a Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This system 

consisted of (1) a borosilicate glass or quartz nozzle, (2) a steel probe w/glass liner, (3) a heated 

quartz fiber filter assembly, (4) a set of six GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a 

Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Prior to 

each test, the first two impingers were filled with 100 ml of a 5% nitric acid (HNO3)/10% 

hydrogen peroxide solution, the third impinger was empty, and the fourth contained 
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 27, 2010 

4

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the metals sampling train 

is provided as Figure 4. 

3.4 Hg Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Hg concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, 

Appendix A, Method 30B and using a Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling 

system. This system consisted of (1) a sorbent trap, (2) a steel probe, (3) Teflon tubing, (4) 

three GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech® control case equipped with a 

pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. The first impinger was left empty as a water 

knockout, and the remaining two impingers contained approximately 300 g of silica gel 

desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Hg sampling train is provided as Figure 5. 

3.5 Hexavalent Chromium Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 

Method 0061 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM-98.01. Hexavalent chromium concentrations and 

emission rates were measured using Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling 

system. This system consisted of (1) a glass nozzle, (2) a heated steel probe with a glass probe 

liner, (4) a Teflon tee with a recirculating pump, (5) five GS impingers, (6) a length of sample 

line, and (7) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and a calibrated 

orifice. Prior to each test, the first impinger was filled with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the next two 

were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N KOH, the fourth was empty, and the last impinger contained 

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Method 0061 sampling 

train is provided as Figure 6. 

3.6 HF and HCl Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Measurement of hydrogen halide concentrations and emission rates were conducted using the 

procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 26A. The Method 26A sampling train consisted 

of: (1) a heated borosilicate or quartz probe liner; (2) a heated borosilicate or quartz glass filter 

holder containing a pre-weighed 110-mm diameter washed quartz filter with Teflon filter 

support; (3) a set of three Greensburg-Smith (GS) impingers each containing 100 ml of 0.1 

Normal Sulfuric Acid (0.1 N H2SO4), (4) a modified GS impinger containing a known weight of 

silica gel desiccant; (5) a length of sample line, and (7) a Nutech control case equipped with a 

pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Figure 7 provides an illustration of the Method 26A 

sample train. 
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 27, 2010 

5

4.0 Test Results 

The overall results of the emissions test program are summarized by Table 2. 

Table 2 

Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Test Date(s) Pollutant MDL 

used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour)

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM2.5 1.3E-01 2.8E-02 3.3E+00 

Organic 

Condensible 

PM2.5

< 2.1E-02 4.5E-03 5.3E-01 

Inorganic 

Condensible 

PM2.5

 1.8E+00 3.8E-01 4.5E+01 

August 17 & 

18, 2010 

Total PM2.5 1.9E+00 4.1E-01 4.9E+01 

Filterable 

Particulate 6.0E-02 1.2E-02 1.7E+00 

Antimony < 1.9E-05 3.9E-06 5.5E-04 

Arsenic 2.7E-05 6.0E-06 8.5E-04 

Beryllium < 4.8E-06 9.7E-07 1.4E-04 

Cadmium 1.1E-05 3.9E-06 5.5E-04 

Chromium 2.7E-04 5.3E-05 7.6E-03 

Cobalt < 4.8E-06 9.7E-07 1.4E-04 

Lead 3.7E-05 7.4E-06 1.0E-03 

Manganese 3.8E-05 7.5E-06 1.1E-03 

Nickel < 2.8E-05 5.7E-06 8.1E-04 

August 18 & 

19, 2010 

Selenium 3.0E-03 6.1E-04 8.7E-02 

October 21 & 

22, 2010 Mercury 2.3E-05 4.6E-06 6.9E-04 

August 18 & 

19, 2010 

Hexavalent 

Chromium 1.5E-04 2.9E-05 4.0E-03 

Hydrogen 

Chloride < 8.7E-03 1.8E-03 2.5E-01 August 18, 

2010 Hydrogen 

Fluoride 6.2E-02 1.3E-02 1.8E+00 

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 27, 2010 

6

Detailed results for individual emission test run are summarized in Appendix A. Process 

production data is included in Appendix B. Field and computer-generated data sheets are 

included in Appendix C. Appendix D includes calibration documents and Appendix E includes 

laboratory analytical reports. Appendix F includes documents relevant to the initial mercury 

testing conducted on August 17 and 18, 2010. 

Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this report are exclusively for use by NAIMA and/or 

Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC. BTEC will not distribute or publish this report 

without NAIMA’s consent except as required by law or court order. BTEC accepts responsibility 

for the competent performance of its duties in executing the assignment and preparing reports in 

accordance with the normal standards of the profession, but disclaims any responsibility for 

consequential damages. 

This report was prepared by: 

David Center 

Staff Environmental Engineer 

This report was reviewed by: 

Randal J. Tysar 

Senior Environmental Engineer 
FIGURES
diameter = 36"

Points Distance "

12 0.8

11 2.4

10 4.2

9 6.4

8 9.0

7 12.8

6 23.2

5 27.0

4 29.6

3 31.8

2 33.6

1 35.2

Figure 1

Site:

Owens Corning

Waxahachie, Texas

V-1 Glass Melter Furnace

BT Environmental Consulting,

Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Not to Scale

<0.5 diameters

 <2 diameters
Bags Samples

to ORSAT

Figure 2

Site:

USEPA Method 3; ORSAT

Owens Corning

Waxahachie, Texas

V-1 Glass Melter Furnace

BT Environmental Consulting, 

Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

ORSAT

pump

tedlar 

bag
Figure 3

Site:

USEPA OTM27/28

Owens Corning

Waxahachie, Texas

V-1 Glass Melter Furnace

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Ferndale,

Michigan

Pump

Silica gel

Heated Filter Box

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple

Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

Probe

Filter

On

Off

-

+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

45mm Filter Housing

Verticle Condenser Filter Holder W/ Teflon Filter

Pot Belly Impinger 100 mL DI H2O
Figure 4

Site:USEPA Method 29Owens CorningWaxahachie, TexasV-1 Glass Melter Furnace

BT Environmental Consult2615 WolcottFerndale Michigan 48220

Silica gel

100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solution 

Heated Filter Box

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple

Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5
Figure 5

Site:USEPA Method 30B Sampling TrainOwens CorningWaxahachie, TexasV-1 Glass Melter Furnace

BT Environmental Cons2615 Wolcott Ferndale, Michigan 482

Knock out

Temperature sensor

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

Sample Line

MercuryT rap

Probe
Figure 6

Site:USEPA Method 0061Owens CorningWaxahachie, TexasV-1 Glass Melter Furnace

BT Environmental Cons2615 WolcottFerndale, Michigan

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

150 mL 0.1 N KOH Empty Silica Gel

Peristaltic pump

Teflon tee

75 mL 0.1 N KOH
Empty

Figure 7

Site:USEPA Method 26A Sampling TrainOwens CorningWaxahachie, TexasV-1 Glass Melter Furnace

BT Environmental Cons2615 WolcottFerndale, Michigan

Heated Filter Box

S-type pitot w/ thermocouple

Heated probe with glass liner

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

Empty 15 mL 0.1N H2SO4 
Appendix A:

Detailed Test Run Results
Plant Job #

Location OTM27/OTM 28 Testing Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 8/17/2010 8/17/2010 8/18/2010

Start Run Start Time 8:20:00 13:15:00 7:31:00

Run Finish Time 12:28:00 17:39:00 12:12:30

Net Traversing Points 12 12 12

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 277.25 238.71 240.05 252

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.223 0.211 0.211 0.215

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.804 0.804 0.804 0.80

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.012 1.012 1.012 1.012

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.31 29.25 29.30 29.29

ΔH Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 0.40 0.38 0.38 0.39

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 101.123 101.114 98.665 100.301

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 75.75 82.79 72.88 77.14

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 98.899 97.403 96.978 97.760

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 213.6 203.7 204.2 207.2

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 10.05 9.59 9.61 9.75

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 9.2 9.0 9.0 9.1

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.908 0.910 0.910 0.909

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 1 1 0.9 1.0

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.3 18.8 19.4 19.5

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 78.7 80.2 79.7 79.5

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.97 28.91 28.92 28.93

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 27.96 27.93 27.94 27.94

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.3 -0.30 -0.30 -0.30

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.29 29.23 29.28 29.26

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 372 378 371 374

ΔPavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.417 0.412 0.412 0.413

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 44.6 44.6 44.4 44.5

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 10,604 10,677 10,640 10,640

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 18,922 18,923 18,818 18,888

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 87.1 112.5 110.9 103.5

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Filterable PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 8.90 10.30 8.40 9.35

Cmg/dscm Filterable PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 3.2E+00 3.7E+00 3.1E+00 3.3E+00

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Filterable PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Filterable PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.3E-01 1.5E-01 1.2E-01 1.3E-01

Elb/ton product Filterable PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Organic Condensible PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 2.10 1.20 1.10 1.5

Cmg/dscm Organic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 7.5E-01 4.4E-01 4.0E-01 5.3E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Organic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Organic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.0E-02 1.7E-02 1.6E-02 2.1E-02

Elb/ton product Organic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 138 118 118 124.7

Cmg/dscm Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 4.9E+01 4.3E+01 4.3E+01 4.5E+01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.0E+00 1.7E+00 1.7E+00 1.8E+00

Elb/ton product Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Total PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 149.0 129.5 127.5 135.3

Cmg/dscm Total PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 5.3E+01 4.7E+01 4.6E+01 4.9E+01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Total PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Total PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.1E+00 1.9E+00 1.9E+00 1.9E+00

Elb/ton product Total PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Owens Corning 10-3990.03

Waxahachie TX

Address

Personnel -
Plant Job #

Location Method 29 Metals Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 8/18/2010 8/19/2010 8/19/2010

Start Run Start Time 16:02:00 7:00:00 10:53:00

Run Finish Time 19:14:00 10:08:00 15:00:00

Net Traversing Points 12 12 12

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 180

DN Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.316 0.316 0.316 0.316

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.812 0.812 0.812 0.81

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.982 0.982 0.982 0.982

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.24 29.27 29.27 29.26

ΔH Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.63 1.66 1.86 1.72

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 132.073 132.498 137.832 134.134

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 76.44 70.11 77.17 74.57

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 125.263 127.307 130.760 127.777

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 270.7 288 291.1 283.3

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 12.74 13.56 13.70 13.33

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 9.2 9.6 9.5 9.4

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.908 0.904 0.905 0.906

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.0 19.3 19.3 19.5

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.2 79.8 79.8 79.6

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.93 28.92 28.92 28.92

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 27.92 27.87 27.88 27.89

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.35 -0.30 -0.30 -0.32

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.21 29.25 29.25 29.24

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 383 379 382 381

ΔPavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.302 0.306 0.346 0.318

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 38.7 38.9 41.5 39.7

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 9,182 9,102 9,753 9,345

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 16,499 16,417 17,585 16,834

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.5 100.1 96.7 98.8

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 7.8 1.4 9.2 6.1

Cmg/dscm Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm 2.2 0.4 2.5 1.7E+00

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 0.07 0.01 0.09 6.0E-02

Elb/ton product Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Antimony Catch Weight, μg 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

Cmg/dscm Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm 5.6E-04 5.5E-04 5.4E-04 5.5E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.9E-05 1.9E-05 2.0E-05 1.9E-05

Elb/ton product Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Arsenic Catch Weight, μg 2.8 2.6 3.8 3.1

Cmg/dscm Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm 7.9E-04 7.2E-04 1.0E-03 8.5E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.7E-05 2.5E-05 3.7E-05 3.0E-05

Elb/ton product Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Beryllium Catch Weight, μg 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

Cmg/dscm Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 1.4E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.8E-06 4.8E-06 4.9E-06 4.8E-06

Elb/ton product Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cadmium Catch Weight, μg 1.19 2.06 2.72 1.99

Cmg/dscm Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm 3.4E-04 5.7E-04 7.3E-04 5.5E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.1E-05 2.0E-05 2.7E-05 1.9E-05

Elb/ton product Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Chromium Catch Weight, μg 28.81 24.41 29.31 27.51

Cmg/dscm Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 8.1E-03 6.8E-03 7.9E-03 7.6E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.8E-04 2.3E-04 2.9E-04 2.7E-04

Elb/ton product Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cobalt Catch Weight, μg 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

Cmg/dscm Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 1.4E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.8E-06 4.8E-06 4.9E-06 4.8E-06

Elb/ton product Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Lead Catch Weight, μg 2.67 2.87 5.87 3.80

Cmg/dscm Lead Concentration, mg/dscm 7.5E-04 8.0E-04 1.6E-03 1.0E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Lead Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Lead Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.6E-05 2.7E-05 5.8E-05 3.7E-05

Elb/ton product Lead Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Manganese Catch Weight, μg 3.72 4.12 3.82 3.89

Cmg/dscm Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm 1.0E-03 1.1E-03 1.0E-03 1.1E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.6E-05 3.9E-05 3.8E-05 3.8E-05

Elb/ton product Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Nickel Catch Weight, μg 3.80 2.50 2.50 2.93

Cmg/dscm Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm 1.1E-03 6.9E-04 6.8E-04 8.1E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.7E-05 2.4E-05 2.5E-05 2.8E-05

Elb/ton product Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Selenium Catch Weight, μg 394.0 288.0 256.0 312.7

Cmg/dscm Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.1E-01 8.0E-02 6.9E-02 8.7E-02

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.8E-03 2.7E-03 2.5E-03 3.0E-03

Elb/ton product Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

OWENS 10-286A

WAXAHACHIE, TX

Address

Personnel GILLEN
Company Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source ID

OWENS WAXHACHIE, TX TEXAS V-1 DEP STACK EPN-3 Please note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"

Measured Value 

(mg/dscm)

Corrected 

Concentration 

(mg/dscm at 7% O2)

Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used (EPA Method 30B) Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments 

1 8/17/2010 8:20 8/17/2010 10:20 1.32E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 3 8/17/2010 14:10 8/17/2010 16:25 2.05E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 5 8/18/2010 7:05 8/18/2010 9:05 4.40E-05 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date Test End Time

Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results

M30B - Owens.xls Hg Emission Data-30B 
 QA/QC Documentation

Trap ID Section 1 Mass (ng) Section 2 Mass (ng) Total Mass (ng) Initial Spike (ng) Total Non- Spike (ng) Sample Volume (dscm) Volume Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough (%) 

9.25 1.0 20.3 18,904 10,697 380.46 R1, B 5.77 9.44 15.21 15.21 0.12 0% 1

8.99 1.0 20.3 18,913 10,633 383.83 R3, B 1.49 21.8 23.29 23.29 0.11 1% 14

9.64 1.0 18.8 18,789 10,667 382.04 R5, B 4.85 0.25 5.1 5.1 0.12 1% 

Flue Gas 

Temperature (F) Other Supporting Information

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue Gas Flow 

Rate (dscfm)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(acfm)

Trap #1

≤20% of field 

recovery test

M30B - Owens.xls Hg Emission Data-30B 
Trap ID Section 1 Mass Section 2 Mass Total Mass Initial Spike Total Non- Spike Sample Volume Volume Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration (μg/dscm) Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit Crec R (%) 

R1, A 7.67 67.00 74.67 10 64.67 0.11 0% 874

0.6

0.4 62 0.5175 

R3, A 3.37 21.80 25.17 10 15.17 0.11 1% 647

0.1

0.1 21 0.0184 

R5, A 164.00 0.25 164.25 10 154.25 0.12 1% 0

1.3

1.3 94 1.3840 

Trap #2 Paired Trap Agreement (RD) Measured S

≤20% of field 

recovery test

≤ 10% of Section 

1 Hg mass for Hg 

conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or ≤ 

20% of Section 1 

for Hg conc.≤1 

μg/dscm

≥10 % RD mass 

for Hg conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or ≤20% 

RD or ≤0.2 

μg/dscm abs.diff. 

for Hg conc. ≤1 

μg/dscm

M30B - Owens.xls Hg Emission Data-30B 
Plant Job #

Location Hex Chrome Testing Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 8/18/2010 8/19/2010 8/19/2010

Start Run Start Time 16:02:00 7:00:00 10:53:00

Run Finish Time 19:14:00 10:08:00 14:00:00

Net Traversing Points 12 12 12

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 180

DN Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.304 0.304 0.304 0.304

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.833 0.833 0.833 0.83

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.012 1.012 1.012 1.012

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.24 29.27 29.27 29.26

ΔH Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.37 1.29 1.31 1.32

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 123.329 123.783 124.068 123.727

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 77.39 70.28 76.76 74.81

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 120.255 122.415 121.221 121.297

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 248.6 290.6 255.8 265.0

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 11.70 13.68 12.04 12.47

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 8.9 10.1 9.0 9.3

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.911 0.899 0.910 0.907

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.0 19.3 19.3 19.5

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.2 79.8 79.8 79.6

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.93 28.92 28.92 28.92

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 27.96 27.82 27.93 27.90

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.35 -0.30 -0.30 -0.32

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.21 29.25 29.25 29.24

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 382 345 330 353

ΔPavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.283 0.322 0.328 0.311

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 38.2 40.2 40.0 39.5

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 9,818 9,046 10,104 9,656

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 17,040 16,222 16,981 16,747

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 103.8 97.3 93.7 98.2

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Hexavalent Chromium Catch Weight, μg 12.4 15.4 16.4 14.7

Cmg/dscm Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 3.6E-03 4.4E-03 4.8E-03 4.3E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.2E-04 1.6E-04 1.8E-04 1.6E-04

Elb/ton product Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

OWENS 10-286A

WAXAHACHIE, TX

Address

Personnel LEE
Plant Job #

Location HCl and HF Testing Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 8/18/2010 8/18/2010 8/18/2010

Start Run Start Time 9:37:00 11:40:00 13:35:00

Run Finish Time 10:42:00 13:05:00 14:45:00

Net Traversing Points 12 12 12

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 60

DN Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.304 0.304 0.304 0.304

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.812 0.812 0.812 0.81

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.982 0.982 0.982 0.982

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.30 29.32 29.32 29.31

ΔH Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.41 1.40 1.42 1.41

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 41.643 41.878 41.889 41.803

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 70.83 75.08 75.04 73.65

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 39.973 39.906 39.921 39.933

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 86.9 82.7 90.7 86.8

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 4.09 3.89 4.27 4.08

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 9.3 8.9 9.7 9.3

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.907 0.911 0.903 0.907

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.9 0.9 1 0.9

%O2 Oxygen, % 19.4 19.4 19.5 19.4

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.7 79.7 79.5 79.6

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.92 28.92 28.94 28.93

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 27.91 27.95 27.88 27.91

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.3 -0.30 -0.30 -0.30

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.28 29.30 29.30 29.29

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 380 385 383 382

ΔPavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.323 0.323 0.324 0.323

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 39.8 39.8 39.9 39.8

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 9,410 9,429 9,373 9,404

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 16,886 16,881 16,915 16,894

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.6 99.3 100.1 99.7

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W HCl Catch Weight, μg 200 200 440 280.0

Cmg/dscm HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 1.8E-01 1.8E-01 3.9E-01 2.5E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 HCl Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr HCl Emission Rate, pounds/hr 6.2E-03 6.2E-03 1.4E-02 8.7E-03

Elb/ton product HCl Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W HF Catch Weight, μg 1900 2100 2000 2000.0

Cmg/dscm HF Concentration, mg/dscm 1.7E+00 1.9E+00 1.8E+00 1.8E+00

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 HF Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr HF Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.9E-02 6.6E-02 6.2E-02 6.2E-02

Elb/ton product HF Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

BTEC 10-286A

WAXAHACHIE, TX

Address

Personnel GILLEN
Appendix B:

Production Data
Appendix C:

Field and Computer Generated

Data Sheets and Notes
Spreadsheet for U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 040 - Determination of PM10 and PM2.5 Emissions

TEST DATA SHEET

Location: Start Time: RUN No. 

Date: End Time: JOB No. 

% Moisture: 9.25 % est. METER BOX: Ts (°F): 792 Tm (°F): 75 Ts-50° 742 Ts+50° 842

Barometric: 29.31 in Hg Y: 1.012 Est. Qs: 1.023 cfm Est. Qs: 1.024 Est. Qs: 1.048

Static Press: -0.30 in H2O ∆H@: 0.4 in H2O Est. μs

: 322.29 mpoise Est. μs: 312.72 Est. μs: 331.7

Stack Press: 29.29 in Hg Cp': 0.804 S/N T3-8-1 Est. ∆H: 0.108 ("H2O) Est. ∆H: 0.117 Est. ∆H: 0.100

%CO2: 1.00 % Cp: 0.804 S/N T3-8-1

%O2: 20.30 % Nozzle Dia: 0.223 inches DGM initial cf

%N2

/CO: 78.70 % Stack Area: 7.069 ft2DGM final cf

Md: 28.97 lb/lb-mole # of Points: 12 points Time min.

Est. Mw: 27.96 lb/lb-mole 240.25 min Leak Rate cfm

Tstd: 528 °R Pstd: 29.92 in Hg Vacuum in. Hg

Pitot Pump

∆P Vac. Imp.

("H2O) Inlet Outlet Stack Ideal Actual (in Hg) Probe Filter Exit

1 24.06 0.450 71.0 72.0 374 0.242 0.400 5 249 249 65 0.610 10.75 2.65

2 24.59 0.470 72.0 72.0 374 0.242 0.400 5 250 249 50 0.607 10.78 2.67

3 24.33 0.460 75.0 72.0 375 0.242 0.400 5 250 250 53 0.608 10.78 2.67

4 23.24 0.420 77.0 75.0 375 0.241 0.400 5 249 249 58 0.692 9.83 2.27

5 22.40 0.390 78.0 77.0 374 0.243 0.400 5 249 250 51 0.652 10.24 2.44

6 19.65 0.300 77.0 77.0 357 0.244 0.400 5 249 249 55 0.615 10.52 2.54

7 23.24 0.420 76.0 77.0 371 0.254 0.400 5 251 251 70 0.639 10.37 2.49

8 24.59 0.470 76.0 76.0 377 0.246 0.400 5 250 249 56 0.660 10.19 2.42

9 24.85 0.480 77.0 76.0 377 0.242 0.400 5 251 247 55 0.631 10.52 2.56

10 23.52 0.430 77.0 76.0 376 0.242 0.400 5 249 249 56 0.665 10.12 2.39

11 21.52 0.360 78.0 77.0 371 0.243 0.400 5 250 249 51 0.725 9.48 2.13

12 21.22 0.350 80.0 77.0 357 0.246 0.400 5 249 249 55 0.487 12.40 3.38

13 - 0.254 - - #VALUE!

Final DGM:

Max

535.4 °R 831.2 °R Vac.

277.21 min 101.12 cf 0.417 75.8 °F 371.5 °F 5 0.400 in H2O fps

Test Personnel (signature/date) Project Leader (signature/date)

∆H (in H20)

EQUIPMENT +/- 50°F ∆H

49-5

ESTIMATES

Orifice Press.

7

0.017 0.004

 D50 

[10 μm]

694.430

685.970

Run Time:

DGM

Gas Temperatures (°F)

15

0

0.004

Gas Temps

1 1

746.080

755.070

764.100

770.203

17-Aug-2010

Sample 

Point

Dwell 

Time 

(min)

669.080

STACK DATA

Dry Gas 

Meter 

Reading (ft3)

OWENS

Qs 

(acfm)

(°F)

677.450

737.090

Ts (avg)

703.670

712.100

719.207

727.790

770.203

Actual Run 

Time Vm ∆Η (avg)

44.602

Vs (avg)

Tm (avg)

D50 [2.5 

μm]

in H2O

∆P (avg)

1

10-286A

LEAK CHECKS

0

8:20 AM

12:28 PM

0.017

Copyright 2006 by Environmental Supply Company, Inc.
Spreadsheet for U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 040 - Determination of PM10 and PM2.5 Emissions

TEST DATA SHEET

Location: Start Time: RUN No. 

Date: End Time: JOB No. 

% Moisture: 9.25 % est. METER BOX: Ts (°F): 371.5 Tm (°F): 76 Ts-50° 321.5 Ts+50° 421.5

Barometric: 29.25 in Hg Y: 1.012 Est. Qs: 0.638 cfm Est. Qs: 0.661 Est. Qs: 0.685

Static Press: -0.30 in H2O ∆H@: 0.38 in H2O Est. μs

: 236.03 mpoise Est. μs: 224.8 Est. μs: 247.03

Stack Press: 29.23 in Hg Cp': 0.804 S/N T3-8-1 Est. ∆H: 0.090 ("H2O) Est. ∆H: 0.102 Est. ∆H: 0.080

%CO2: 1.00 % Cp: 0.804 S/N T3-8-1

%O2: 18.80 % Nozzle Dia: 0.211 inches DGM initial cf

%N2

/CO: 80.20 % Stack Area: 7.069 ft2DGM final cf

Md: 28.91 lb/lb-mole # of Points: 12 points Time min.

Est. Mw: 27.90 lb/lb-mole 240.00 min Leak Rate cfm

Tstd: 528 °R Pstd: 29.92 in Hg Vacuum in. Hg

Pitot Pump

∆P Vac. Imp.

("H2O) Inlet Outlet Stack Ideal Actual (in Hg) Probe Filter Exit

1 21.29 0.470 78.0 79.0 374 0.090 0.380 5 251 228 84 0.645 10.34 2.48

2 20.83 0.450 78.0 79.0 378 0.090 0.380 5 249 249 56 0.587 11.09 2.81

3 20.36 0.430 82.0 80.0 378 0.089 0.380 5 251 249 61 0.762 9.21 2.03

4 19.64 0.400 83.0 81.0 379 0.090 0.380 5 250 249 53 0.786 9.02 1.96

5 19.14 0.380 84.0 82.0 377 0.090 0.380 5 250 250 58 0.807 8.84 1.89

6 17.01 0.300 86.0 83.0 353 0.090 0.380 5 250 250 54 0.830 8.48 1.74

7 20.36 0.430 83.0 83.0 379 0.096 0.380 5 251 250 71 0.774 9.12 2.00

8 20.83 0.450 86.0 84.0 381 0.090 0.380 5 250 249 53 0.724 9.58 2.18

9 20.83 0.450 85.0 84.0 383 0.090 0.380 5 249 249 55 0.739 9.46 2.13

10 19.64 0.400 85.0 84.0 385 0.089 0.380 5 249 249 58 0.815 8.85 1.90

11 19.64 0.400 85.0 84.0 385 0.089 0.380 5 250 250 59 0.618 10.76 2.67

12 19.14 0.380 85.0 84.0 383 0.089 0.380 5 250 250 58 0.705 9.78 2.26

13 - 0.089 - - #VALUE!

Final DGM:

Max

542.8 °R 837.9 °R Vac.

238.71 min 101.11 cf 0.412 82.8 °F 377.9 °F 5 0.380 in H2O fps

Test Personnel (signature/date) Project Leader (signature/date)

∆H (in H20)

EQUIPMENT +/- 50°F ∆H

49-5

ESTIMATES

Orifice Press.

12

0.013 0.003

 D50 

[10 μm]

795.000

786.030

Run Time:

DGM

Gas Temperatures (°F)

15

0

0.003

Gas Temps

1 1

848.149

857.379

864.379

872.179

17-Aug-2010

Sample 

Point

Dwell 

Time 

(min)

771.065

STACK DATA

Dry Gas 

Meter 

Reading (ft3)

OWENS

Qs 

(acfm)

(°F)

779.000

839.249

Ts (avg)

803.930

812.900

821.364

830.499

872.179

Actual Run 

Time Vm ∆Η (avg)

44.632

Vs (avg)

Tm (avg)

D50 [2.5 

μm]

in H2O

∆P (avg)

2

10-286A

LEAK CHECKS

0

8:20 AM

12:28 PM

0.013

Copyright 2006 by Environmental Supply Company, Inc.
Spreadsheet for U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 040 - Determination of PM10 and PM2.5 Emissions

TEST DATA SHEET

Location: Start Time: RUN No. 

Date: End Time: JOB No. 

% Moisture: 9 % est. METER BOX: Ts (°F): 377.9 Tm (°F): 75 Ts-50° 327.92 Ts+50° 427.92

Barometric: 29.30 in Hg Y: 1.012 Est. Qs: 0.644 cfm Est. Qs: 0.667 Est. Qs: 0.691

Static Press: -0.30 in H2O ∆H@: 0.38 in H2O Est. μs

: 237.66 mpoise Est. μs: 226.46 Est. μs: 248.63

Stack Press: 29.28 in Hg Cp': 0.804 S/N T3-8-1 Est. ∆H: 0.091 ("H2O) Est. ∆H: 0.103 Est. ∆H: 0.081

%CO2: 0.90 % Cp: 0.804 S/N T3-8-1

%O2: 19.40 % Nozzle Dia: 0.211 inches DGM initial cf

%N2/CO: 79.70 % Stack Area: 7.069 ft2DGM final cf

Md: 28.92 lb/lb-mole # of Points: 12 points Time min.

Est. Mw: 27.94 lb/lb-mole 240.25 min Leak Rate cfm

Tstd: 528 °R Pstd: 29.92 in Hg Vacuum in. Hg

Pitot Pump

∆P Vac. Imp.

("H2O) Inlet Outlet Stack Ideal Actual (in Hg) Probe Filter Exit

1 20.73 0.440 69.0 68.0 376 0.090 0.380 5 250 251 73 0.686 9.91 2.31

2 21.20 0.460 71.0 69.0 378 0.090 0.380 5 250 250 52 0.642 10.40 2.51

3 21.20 0.460 73.0 71.0 379 0.090 0.380 6 250 251 350 0.681 9.99 2.34

4 20.25 0.420 73.0 72.0 379 0.090 0.380 6 250 250 50 0.751 9.32 2.07

5 19.01 0.370 74.0 73.0 352 0.090 0.380 6 250 251 55 0.776 8.88 1.89

6 18.49 0.350 74.0 74.0 351 0.097 0.380 6 250 250 57 0.775 8.88 1.89

7 17.40 0.310 72.0 73.0 364 0.097 0.380 5 250 251 76 0.696 9.70 2.21

8 17.68 0.320 73.0 73.0 365 0.094 0.380 5 250 251 53 0.753 9.18 2.01

9 20.73 0.440 73.0 73.0 371 0.094 0.380 5 250 250 55 0.627 10.52 2.55

10 21.20 0.460 75.0 74.0 378 0.092 0.380 5 251 251 56 0.691 9.88 2.29

11 20.96 0.450 76.0 74.0 382 0.091 0.380 6 250 249 56 0.810 8.86 1.90

12 21.20 0.460 77.0 75.0 382 0.090 0.380 6 250 249 55 0.702 9.80 2.27

13 - 0.090 - - #VALUE!

Final DGM:

Max

532.5 °R 831.1 °R Vac.

240.05 min 98.67 cf 0.412 72.9 °F 371.4 °F 6 0.380 in H2O fps

Test Personnel (signature/date) Project Leader (signature/date)

∆H (in H20)

EQUIPMENT +/- 50°F ∆H

49-5

ESTIMATES

Orifice Press.

9

0.004 0.001

 D50 

[10 μm]

901.280

893.060

Run Time:

DGM

Gas Temperatures (°F)

15

0

0.001

Gas Temps

1 1

949.340

957.730

967.410

975.920

18-Aug-2010

Sample 

Point

Dwell 

Time 

(min)

877.255

STACK DATA

Dry Gas 

Meter 

Reading (ft3)

OWENS

Qs 

(acfm)

(°F)

885.330

941.860

Ts (avg)

909.940

918.640

927.113

934.140

975.920

Actual Run 

Time Vm ∆Η (avg)

44.346

Vs (avg)

Tm (avg)

D50 [2.5 

μm]

in H2O

∆P (avg)

3

10-286A

LEAK CHECKS

0

7:31 AM

12:12 PM

0.004

Copyright 2006 by Environmental Supply Company, Inc.
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A Probe # T4-E-7 Pollutant PM/METALSPoints/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company OWENS DGM # T4-2 Method 29 Total Points 12 16:02 19:14 15/0.000 8.5/

Location WAXAHACHIE, TXRate (cfm) 0.734 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 15.0

Source V-1 DEP STACKDelta ∆H@ 1.625 Date 8/18/10 Time/reading 5.0Operator GILLEN Bws (%) 9.33 # of Ports 2 Total Run 180.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 244.5 Cp 0.812 Ps (in Hg) 29.21Barometric 29.24 Silica Gel Weight Gain 26.2 DGM Y 0.982 Pm (in Hg) 29.33 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.35 Actual Dn (in) 0.316 O2 (%) 20 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00054 CO2 (%) 0.8 Md 28.93 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) 1.25 Ms 27.91 Act. Flow (cfm) 16,417 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 124.64 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.32 Total Vol.(cf) 132.1 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 10,038

Moisture % 9.27 Preliminary Ts (oF) 385 Est. Us (ft/s) 40.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 9,102

Preliminary Tm (oF) 75 Theor Dn (in) 0.3160 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 5.0 16:02 650.76 0.24 380 72 71 1.17 1.3 2

1 5.0 10.0 16:07 654.23 0.25 382 72 72 1.22 1.35 2

1 10.0 15.0 16:12 657.59 0.24 382 74 72 1.17 1.3 2

2 15.0 20.0 16:17 660.92 0.28 385 74 72 1.37 1.5 22 20.0 25.0 16:22 664.41 0.31 385 76 72 1.51 1.7 22 25.0 30.0 16:27 668.22 0.30 385 76 72 1.46 1.6 23 30.0 35.0 16:32 671.98 0.29 385 77 73 1.42 1.6 23 35.0 40.0 16:37 675.64 0.30 385 78 73 1.46 1.6 23 40.0 45.0 16:42 679.52 0.30 385 78 73 1.46 1.6 24 45.0 50.0 16:47 683.14 0.32 385 78 74 1.56 1.7 24 50.0 55.0 16:52 686.12 0.32 385 79 74 1.56 1.7 24 55.0 60.0 16:57 691.01 0.31 386 79 74 1.51 1.7 25 60.0 65.0 17:02 695.31 0.33 385 79 74 1.61 1.8 25 65.0 70.0 17:07 698.61 0.33 385 79 74 1.61 1.8 25 70.0 75.0 17:12 702.38 0.33 385 79 74 1.61 1.8 26 75.0 80.0 17:17 706.18 0.33 385 79 74 1.61 1.8 26 80.0 85.0 17:22 710.18 0.26 382 80 75 1.27 1.4 26 85.0 90.0 17:27 714.11 0.26 382 80 75 1.27 1.4 21 90.0 95.0 17:44 717.34 0.34 384 77 75 1.66 1.8 21 95.0 100.0 17:49 721.32 0.34 384 78 75 1.66 1.8 21 100.0 105.0 17:54 725.26 0.34 384 79 75 1.66 1.8 22 105.0 110.0 17:59 728.92 0.34 384 80 75 1.66 1.8 22 110.0 115.0 18:04 732.78 0.35 384 80 76 1.71 1.9 22 115.0 120.0 18:09 736.92 0.35 383 80 76 1.71 1.9 23 120.0 125.0 18:14 740.22 0.35 383 80 76 1.71 1.9 23 125.0 130.0 18:19 744.30 0.34 383 80 76 1.66 1.8 23 130.0 135.0 18:24 748.63 0.34 383 80 76 1.66 1.8 24 135.0 140.0 18:29 752.38 0.34 383 80 76 1.66 1.8 24 140.0 145.0 18:34 755.82 0.30 382 80 76 1.46 1.6 24 145.0 150.0 18:39 758.92 0.31 382 79 76 1.51 1.7 25 150.0 155.0 18:44 761.49 0.31 381 79 76 1.51 1.7 25 155.0 160.0 18:49 765.42 0.26 381 80 76 1.27 1.4 25 160.0 165.0 18:54 768.64 0.27 381 80 76 1.32 1.4 26 165.0 170.0 18:59 772.01 0.23 381 81 76 1.12 1.25 2

6 170.0 175.0 19:04 775.12 0.23 378 80 76 1.12 1.25 26 175.0 180.0 19:09 778.56 0.23 378 80 76 1.12 1.25 2

180.0 19:14 782.836

Average: 132.07 0.30 383.1 78.4 74.5 1.47 1.63 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A Probe # T4-E-7 Pollutant PM/METALSPoints/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company OWENS DGM # T4-2 Method 29 Total Points 12 7:00 10:08 15.0/0.000 8.5/

Location WAXAHACHIE, TXRate (cfm) 0.736 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 15.0

Source V-1 DEP STACKDelta ∆H@ 1.657 Date 8/19/10 Time/reading 5.0Operator GILLEN Bws (%) 9.54 # of Ports 2 Total Run 180.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 257.4 Cp 0.812 Ps (in Hg) 29.25Barometric 29.27 Silica Gel Weight Gain 30.6 DGM Y 0.982 Pm (in Hg) 29.36 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.3 Actual Dn (in) 0.316 O2 (%) 19.3 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00054 CO2 (%) 0.9 Md 28.92 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) 1.25 Ms 27.87 Act. Flow (cfm) 16,499 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 126.68 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.32 Total Vol.(cf) 132.5 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 10,150

Moisture % 9.67 Preliminary Ts (oF) 385 Est. Us (ft/s) 40.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 9,182

Preliminary Tm (oF) 75 Theor Dn (in) 0.3164 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 5.0 7:00 785.08 0.27 378 65 65 1.33 1.45 2

1 5.0 10.0 7:05 788.72 0.26 378 66 65 1.28 1.4 2

1 10.0 15.0 7:10 792.01 0.26 378 67 65 1.28 1.4 22 15.0 20.0 7:15 795.62 0.28 379 68 66 1.38 1.5 22 20.0 25.0 7:20 799.41 0.29 379 69 66 1.43 1.6 22 25.0 30.0 7:25 802.63 0.29 379 69 66 1.43 1.6 23 30.0 35.0 7:30 806.24 0.31 379 69 66 1.53 1.7 23 35.0 40.0 7:35 809.99 0.31 380 70 67 1.53 1.7 23 40.0 45.0 7:40 813.69 0.31 380 70 67 1.53 1.7 24 45.0 50.0 7:45 817.49 0.33 380 71 67 1.62 1.8 24 50.0 55.0 7:50 821.24 0.34 381 72 68 1.67 1.85 2

4 55.0 60.0 7:55 825.04 0.34 381 72 68 1.67 1.85 25 60.0 65.0 8:00 829.26 0.36 380 72 68 1.77 1.95 25 65.0 70.0 8:05 833.09 0.36 380 73 69 1.77 1.95 25 70.0 75.0 8:10 836.83 0.36 381 73 69 1.77 1.95 26 75.0 80.0 8:15 841.12 0.33 380 73 69 1.62 1.8 2

6 80.0 85.0 8:20 845.14 0.34 379 73 69 1.67 1.85 2

6 85.0 90.0 8:25 848.51 0.34 379 73 69 1.67 1.85 21 90.0 95.0 8:38 852.578 0.27 377 71 69 1.33 1.45 21 95.0 100.0 8:43 855.92 0.27 378 71 69 1.33 1.45 21 100.0 105.0 8:48 859.12 0.27 378 71 69 1.33 1.45 22 105.0 110.0 8:53 863.02 0.28 377 71 69 1.38 1.5 2

2 110.0 115.0 8:58 866.68 0.29 378 72 69 1.43 1.6 22 115.0 120.0 9:03 869.82 0.29 379 72 69 1.43 1.6 23 120.0 125.0 9:08 873.49 0.28 378 73 69 1.38 1.5 23 125.0 130.0 9:13 877.09 0.28 379 73 70 1.38 1.5 23 130.0 135.0 9:18 880.59 0.28 379 74 70 1.38 1.5 24 135.0 140.0 9:23 884.12 0.31 379 74 70 1.53 1.7 24 140.0 145.0 9:28 887.72 0.31 379 74 70 1.53 1.7 24 145.0 150.0 9:33 891.42 0.31 379 74 70 1.53 1.7 25 150.0 155.0 9:38 895.23 0.30 379 74 70 1.48 1.6 25 155.0 160.0 9:43 899.28 0.32 379 74 71 1.58 1.7 25 160.0 165.0 9:48 902.74 0.32 379 74 71 1.58 1.7 26 165.0 170.0 9:53 906.72 0.32 379 74 71 1.58 1.7 26 170.0 175.0 9:58 910.38 0.31 379 75 71 1.53 1.7 26 175.0 180.0 10:03 913.81 0.32 378 75 71 1.58 1.7 2

180.0 10:08 917.576

Average: 132.50 0.31 379.0 71.7 68.5 1.51 1.66 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A Probe # T4-E-7 Pollutant PM/METALS Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Po

Company OWENS DGM # T4-2 Method 29 Total Points 12 10:53 15:00 15.0/0.000 7.5/0

Location WAXAHACHIE, TXRate (cfm) 0.766 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 15.0

Source V-1 DEP STACKDelta ∆H@ 1.86 Date 19-Aug-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator GILLEN Bws (%) 9.55 # of Ports 2 Total Run 180.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 261.9 Cp 0.812 Ps (in Hg) 29.25Barometric 29.27 Silica Gel Weight Gain 29.2 DGM Y 0.982 Pm (in Hg) 29.36 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.3 Actual Dn (in) 0.316 O2 (%) 19.3 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00054 CO2 (%) 0.9 Md 28.92 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) 1.25 Ms 27.87 Act. Flow (cfm) 17,585 Must delete extra ze

Vmnstd 130.05 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.32 Total Vol.(cf) 137.9 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 10,782

Moisture % 9.53 Preliminary Ts (oF) 385 Est. Us (ft/s) 40.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 9,753

Preliminary Tm (oF) 75 Theor Dn (in) 0.3164 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do 

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(*

1 0.0 5.0 10:53 918.88 0.33 382 70 70 1.84 1.7 2

1 5.0 10.0 10:58 921.62 0.33 382 71 70 1.84 1.7 21 10.0 15.0 11:03 925.42 0.33 382 72 70 1.84 1.7 22 15.0 20.0 11:08 929.03 0.35 381 73 70 1.95 1.9 22 20.0 25.0 11:13 932.92 0.35 382 74 70 1.95 1.9 22 25.0 30.0 11:18 937.21 0.35 382 75 71 1.95 1.9 23 30.0 35.0 11:23 940.51 0.35 382 76 71 1.95 1.9 23 35.0 40.0 11:28 944.73 0.35 382 77 72 1.95 1.9 23 40.0 45.0 11:33 948.63 0.35 382 77 72 1.95 1.9 24 45.0 50.0 11:38 951.38 0.35 382 77 72 1.95 1.9 24 50.0 55.0 11:43 956.63 0.35 381 77 72 1.95 1.9 24 55.0 60.0 11:48 961.14 0.33 381 78 73 1.84 1.75 2

5 60.0 65.0 11:53 963.56 0.35 382 78 73 1.95 1.9 2

5 65.0 70.0 11:58 967.62 0.38 382 79 73 2.12 2.05 2

5 70.0 75.0 12:03 971.43 0.37 382 80 74 2.06 2 2

6 75.0 80.0 12:08 975.72 0.37 381 81 75 2.06 2 26 80.0 85.0 12:13 980.42 0.36 381 81 75 2.01 1.95 2

6 85.0 90.0 12:18 984.85 0.37 381 81 75 2.06 2 2

1 90.0 95.0 12:30 988.462 0.28 381 79 76 1.56 1.5 2

1 95.0 100.0 12:35 992.02 0.28 381 79 76 1.56 1.5 21 100.0 105.0 12:40 995.92 0.28 381 80 76 1.56 1.5 22 105.0 110.0 12:45 998.61 0.33 381 80 76 1.84 1.8 22 110.0 115.0 12:50 1002.98 0.33 382 81 76 1.84 1.8 22 115.0 120.0 12:55 1006.62 0.33 382 82 77 1.84 1.8 23 120.0 125.0 13:00 1010.21 0.32 382 82 77 1.78 1.7 23 125.0 130.0 13:05 1014.12 0.33 382 82 77 1.84 1.8 23 130.0 135.0 13:10 1017.72 0.33 382 83 77 1.84 1.8 24 135.0 140.0 13:15 1022.61 0.32 382 83 78 1.78 1.7 24 140.0 145.0 13:20 1025.62 0.35 383 83 78 1.95 1.9 24 145.0 150.0 13:25 1029.68 0.36 382 83 78 2.01 1.95 2

5 150.0 155.0 14:30 1034.12 0.38 382 84 79 2.12 2.05 25 155.0 160.0 14:35 1037.55 0.38 383 84 79 2.12 2.05 25 160.0 165.0 14:40 1041.45 0.38 382 84 79 2.12 2.05 26 165.0 170.0 14:45 1045.63 0.39 383 85 79 2.18 2.1 2

6 170.0 175.0 14:50 1049.87 0.38 381 84 80 2.12 2.05 2

6 175.0 180.0 14:55 1053.48 0.39 382 85 80 2.18 2.1 2

180.0 185.0 15:00 1056.714

Average: 137.83 0.35 381.8 79.4 74.9 1.93 1.86 24

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A-OH Probe # HG PROBE Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company OWENS CORNINGDGM # 15 AND 18 Method 30B Total Points 0

Location WAXAHACHIE, TXRate (L/m) 1 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source V-1 Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 21-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator PILGRIM Bws (%) 8.96 # of Ports Total Run 120.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume N/A Cp N/A Ps (in Hg) 29.39

Barometric 29.39 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y 1.000/1.002 Pm (in Hg) 29.39 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 7.06858 CO2 (%) Md 28.00 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 27.10 Act. Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 120.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

2:45:00 PM 0.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 0.00 0 90 962:50:00 PM 5.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 5.01 5.02 90 962:55:00 PM 10.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 10.11 10 90 963:00:00 PM 15.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 15.01 15.15 90 963:05:00 PM 20.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 19.53 19.89 90 963:10:00 PM 25.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 25.51 24.91 90 963:15:00 PM 30.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 31.22 29.99 90 963:20:00 PM 35.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 35.61 34.89 91 963:25:00 PM 40.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 40.62 40.11 92 973:30:00 PM 45.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 44.72 45.22 94 983:35:00 PM 50.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 49.41 51.33 93 993:40:00 PM 55.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 55.09 55.42 93 1003:45:00 PM 60.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 60.23 59.52 91 993:50:00 PM 65.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 65.41 64.48 91 1003:55:00 PM 70.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 70.26 70.51 92 1004:00:00 PM 75.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 75.71 74.48 91 1004:05:00 PM 80.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 81.44 79.94 91 1004:10:00 PM 85.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 86.21 85.1 90 1014:15:00 PM 90.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 91.05 90.51 90 1014:20:00 PM 95.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 95.45 95.28 90 1024:25:00 PM 100.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 100.14 100.11 90 1014:30:00 PM 105.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 105.04 105.18 89 1014:35:00 PM 110.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 109.78 110 89 1014:40:00 PM 115.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 114.89 115.05 90 1024:45:00 PM 120.0 120.094 120.018

Average 120.0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 90.70833333 98.75

Volume 120.094 120.018 

dscm 0.11 0.11 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Leak 

Pre Test Post Test Pre Tes

22.0"@0.000 6.0"@0.000 20.0"@0.0

Trap/ Probe Temp 
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A-OH Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company OWENS CORNINGDGM # 15 AND 18 Method 30B Total Points 0

Location WAXAHACHIE, TXRate (L/m) 1 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source V-1 Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 22-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator PILGRIM Bws (%) 9.67 # of Ports Total Run 120.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume N/A Cp N/A Ps (in Hg) 29.33

Barometric 29.33 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y 1.000/1.002 Pm (in Hg) 29.33 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 7.06858 CO2 (%) Md 28.00 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 27.03 Act. Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 120.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

8:20:00 AM 0.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 124.907 124.218 72 738:25:00 AM 5.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 130.27 130.5 72 738:30:00 AM 10.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 135.01 133.82 72 738:35:00 AM 15.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 139.36 138.75 72 738:40:00 AM 20.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 144.21 143.99 72 748:45:00 AM 25.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 150.12 149.21 72 748:50:00 AM 30.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 154.72 155.92 73 748:55:00 AM 35.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 158.31 158.16 72 759:00:00 AM 40.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 164.32 163.99 73 759:05:00 AM 45.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 168.65 168.43 73 759:10:00 AM 50.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 173.63 173.58 73 759:15:00 AM 55.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 179.98 178.69 73 759:20:00 AM 60.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 184.02 184.52 73 769:25:00 AM 65.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 188.48 189.24 73 759:30:00 AM 70.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 194.31 194.82 73 769:35:00 AM 75.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 198.23 199.28 73 769:40:00 AM 80.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 203.18 205.14 73 769:45:00 AM 85.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 208.52 210.19 74 769:50:00 AM 90.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 213.26 214.9 74 779:55:00 AM 95.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 218.68 220.31 74 77

10:00:00 AM 100.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 224.40 225.52 75 7710:05:00 AM 105.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 229.81 230.81 75 7810:10:00 AM 110.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 235.57 235.22 76 7810:15:00 AM 115.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 240.62 240.32 77 7910:20:00 AM 120.0 245.102 245.104

Average 120.0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 73.29166667 75.42

Volume 120.195 120.886 

dscm 0.12 0.12 

Trap/ Probe Temp

23.0"@0.0

Pre Tes

22.0"@0.000 6.0"@0.000 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Leak 

Pre Test Post Test
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A-OH Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company OWENS CORNINGDGM # 15 AND 18 Method 30B Total Points 0

Location WAXAHACHIE, TXRate (L/m) 1 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source V-1 Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 22-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator PILGRIM Bws (%) 9.58 # of Ports Total Run 120.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume N/A Cp N/A Ps (in Hg) 29.35

Barometric 29.35 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y 1.000/1.002 Pm (in Hg) 29.35 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 7.06858 CO2 (%) Md 28.00 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 27.04 Act. Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 120.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

10:35:00 AM 0.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 247.471 247.143 77 7910:10:00 AM 5.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 252.29 252.26 77 7910:45:00 AM 10.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 256.84 257.21 77 7911:45:00 AM 15.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 262.09 262.059 80 8111:50:00 AM 20.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 267.57 268.00 80 8111:55:00 AM 25.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 272.45 273.14 80 8212:00:00 PM 30.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 277.82 278.22 80 8212:05:00 PM 35.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 283.08 283.38 80 8212:10:00 PM 40.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 287.68 287.41 81 8312:15:00 PM 45.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 293.35 293.09 81 8412:20:00 PM 50.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 299.15 298.99 81 8412:25:00 PM 55.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 303.33 303.23 81 8412:30:00 PM 60.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 308.08 308.14 81 8412:35:00 PM 65.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 313.03 313.23 80 8412:40:00 PM 70.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 318.16 318.63 80 8312:45:00 PM 75.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 323.23 323.95 81 8312:50:00 PM 80.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 327.82 328.76 82 8412:55:00 PM 85.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 332.92 333.74 82 84

1:00:00 PM 90.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 338.76 339.13 81 841:05:00 PM 95.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 344.06 343.92 83 851:10:00 PM 100.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 348.89 348.92 84 851:15:00 PM 105.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 353.98 353.87 85 861:20:00 PM 110.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 357.82 357.61 84 861:25:00 PM 115.0 0.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 362.29 362.58 84 871:30:00 PM 120.0 367.947 367.883

Average 120.0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 80.91666667 83.13

Volume 120.476 120.740 

dscm 0.12 0.12 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Leak 

Pre Test Post Test Pre Tes

22.0"@0.000 6.5"@0.000 24.0"@0.0

Trap/ Probe Temp 
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A Probe # ACP-8 Pollutant CR+6 Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post

Company OWENS DGM # 49-5 Method 61 Total Points 12 16:02 19:14 15.0/0.000 9.5/0.004

Location WAXAHACHIE, TXRate (cfm) 0.669 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 15.0

Source V-1 DEP STACKDelta ∆H@ 1.373 Date 18-Aug-10 Time/reading 5.0

Operator LEE Bws (%) 8.90 # of Ports 2 Total Run 180.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 213.4 Cp 0.833 Ps (in Hg) 29.21

Barometric 29.24 Silica Gel Weight Gain 35.2 DGM Y 1.012 Pm (in Hg) 29.33 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.35 Actual Dn (in) 0.304 O2 (%) 20 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00050 CO2 (%) 0.8 Md 28.93 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) 1.25 Ms 27.96 Act. Flow (cfm) 16,222 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column

Vmnstd 119.74 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.32 Total Vol.(cf) 120.4 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 9,929

Moisture % 8.90 Preliminary Ts (oF) 385 Est. Us (ft/s) 41.2 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 9,046

Preliminary Tm (oF) 75 Theor Dn (in) 0.3107 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch"

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp. 

(*F)

Filter Temp 

(*F)

Imp temp. 

(*F) Pump Vac.

1 0.0 5.0 16:02 976.57 0.35 384 72 72 1.32 1.75 251 78 5

1 5.0 10.0 16:07 980.32 0.33 385 73 73 1.24 1.65 204 68 5

1 10.0 15.0 16:12 983.97 0.33 385 76 73 1.24 1.65 166 66 5

2 15.0 20.0 16:17 987.58 0.36 385 77 73 1.35 1.75 146 66 5

2 20.0 25.0 16:22 991.36 0.37 384 77 73 1.39 1.8 138 65 5

2 25.0 30.0 16:27 995.18 0.37 384 78 74 1.39 1.8 134 65 5

3 30.0 35.0 16:32 999.01 0.31 384 78 74 1.17 1.5 138 59 5

3 35.0 40.0 16:37 1002.52 0.31 384 78 74 1.17 1.5 136 59 5

3 40.0 45.0 16:42 1006.02 0.30 384 78 74 1.13 1.45 135 59 4.5

4 45.0 50.0 16:47 1009.47 0.30 384 79 75 1.13 1.45 135 60 4.5

4 50.0 55.0 16:52 1012.93 0.30 384 79 75 1.13 1.45 128 60 4.5

4 55.0 60.0 16:57 1016.38 0.30 384 79 75 1.13 1.45 121 61 4.5

5 60.0 65.0 17:02 1019.84 0.24 384 79 76 0.90 1.15 109 61 4.5

5 65.0 70.0 17:07 1022.94 0.24 384 79 76 0.90 1.15 106 61 4

5 70.0 75.0 17:12 1026.03 0.24 384 79 76 0.90 1.15 106 61 4

6 75.0 80.0 17:17 1029.13 0.22 385 79 76 0.83 1.05 107 61 4

6 80.0 85.0 17:22 1032.10 0.22 387 79 76 0.83 1.05 109 60 4

6 85.0 90.0 17:27 1035.06 0.22 387 79 76 0.83 1.05 110 80 4

1 90.0 95.0 17:44 1038.096 0.25 380 77 76 0.94 1.2 99 62 4

1 95.0 100.0 17:49 1041.26 0.25 381 78 76 0.94 1.2 96 62 6

1 100.0 105.0 17:54 1044.42 0.25 381 80 77 0.94 1.2 95 62 6

2 105.0 110.0 17:59 1050.43 0.20 381 80 77 0.75 0.98 95 61 6

2 110.0 115.0 18:04 1053.26 0.20 380 81 77 0.75 0.98 94 60 6

2 115.0 120.0 18:09 1056.1 0.20 380 80 77 0.75 0.98 93 60 5

3 120.0 125.0 18:14 1058.93 0.20 378 80 77 0.75 0.98 93 60 5

3 125.0 130.0 18:19 1061.77 0.20 378 80 77 0.75 0.98 97 61 5

3 130.0 135.0 18:24 1064.60 0.20 376 79 78 0.75 0.98 99 61 5

4 135.0 140.0 18:29 1067.44 0.26 380 79 78 0.98 1.25 100 62 5

4 140.0 145.0 18:34 1070.67 0.28 380 80 78 1.05 1.35 100 63 5

4 145.0 150.0 18:39 1074.03 0.28 380 80 78 1.05 1.35 100 64 6

5 150.0 155.0 18:44 1077.38 0.34 381 80 78 1.28 1.65 101 64 6

5 155.0 160.0 18:49 1081.08 0.34 381 81 78 1.28 1.65 102 65 6

5 160.0 165.0 18:54 1084.77 0.34 381 81 78 1.28 1.65 103 64 6

6 165.0 170.0 18:59 1088.47 0.36 381 81 78 1.35 1.75 104 64 6

6 170.0 175.0 19:04 1092.28 0.36 380 81 78 1.35 1.75 104 64 6

6 175.0 180.0 19:09 1096.09 0.36 380 81 78 1.35 1.75 103 64 6

180.0 19:14 1099.903

Average: 123.33 0.28 382.3 78.8 76.0 1.06 1.37 118 #DIV/0! 63.1388889 5

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A Probe # ACP-8 Pollutant CR+6 Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post

Company OWENS DGM # 49-5 Method 61 Total Points 12 7:00 10:08 15.0/0.007 8.08/0.000

Location WAXAHACHIE, TXRate (cfm) 0.681 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 15.0

Source V-1 DEP STACKDelta ∆H@ 1.286 Date 19-Aug-10 Time/reading 5.0

Operator LEE Bws (%) 10.09 # of Ports 2 Total Run 180.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 260 Cp 0.833 Ps (in Hg) 29.25

Barometric 29.27 Silica Gel Weight Gain 30.6 DGM Y 1.012 Pm (in Hg) 29.36 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.3 Actual Dn (in) 0.304 O2 (%) 19.3 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00050 CO2 (%) 0.9 Md 28.92 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) 1.25 Ms 27.81 Act. Flow (cfm) 17,040 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column

Vmnstd 121.93 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.32 Total Vol.(cf) 122.6 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 10,920

Moisture % 10.09 Preliminary Ts (oF) 385 Est. Us (ft/s) 41.2 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 9,818

Preliminary Tm (oF) 75 Theor Dn (in) 0.3124 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch"

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp. 

(*F)

Filter Temp 

(*F)

Imp temp. 

(*F) Pump Vac.

1 0.0 5.0 7:00 100.63 0.35 378 66 66 1.24 1.35 80 67 5

1 5.0 10.0 7:05 104.4 0.35 378 66 66 1.24 1.35 94 53 5

1 10.0 15.0 7:10 107.65 0.34 379 67 66 1.21 1.3 98 49 5

2 15.0 20.0 7:15 111.15 0.36 379 68 66 1.28 1.4 101 48 5

2 20.0 25.0 7:20 114.73 0.37 379 68 67 1.32 1.45 102 49 5

2 25.0 30.0 7:25 118.35 0.36 379 69 67 1.28 1.4 105 49 5

3 30.0 35.0 7:30 121.96 0.35 379 70 67 1.24 1.35 109 49 5

3 35.0 40.0 7:35 125.48 0.33 379 70 67 1.17 1.25 110 49 5

3 40.0 45.0 7:40 128.86 0.34 379 70 68 1.21 1.3 111 49 5

4 45.0 50.0 7:45 132.39 0.33 379 71 68 1.17 1.25 110 50 5

4 50.0 55.0 7:50 135.72 0.33 378 71 68 1.17 1.25 110 51 5

4 55.0 60.0 7:55 139.1 0.33 379 71 68 1.17 1.25 112 51 5

5 60.0 65.0 8:00 142.5 0.30 379 72 69 1.07 1.15 111 52 4.5

5 65.0 70.0 8:05 145.72 0.30 304 72 69 1.07 1.15 110 53 4.5

5 70.0 75.0 8:10 148.91 0.30 294 72 69 1.07 1.15 109 54 4.5

6 75.0 80.0 8:15 152.08 0.25 147 72 69 0.89 0.97 108 53 4

6 80.0 85.0 8:20 154.85 0.25 122 72 70 0.89 0.97 104 55 4

6 85.0 90.0 8:25 157.86 0.25 114 72 70 0.89 0.97 102 55 4

1 90.0 95.0 8:38 160.981 0.36 369 71 70 1.28 1.5 88 62 5.5

1 95.0 100.0 8:43 164.71 0.35 378 71 70 1.24 1.45 95 51 5.5

1 100.0 105.0 8:48 168.36 0.35 378 71 70 1.24 1.45 101 52 5.5

2 105.0 110.0 8:53 172.02 0.37 378 71 70 1.32 1.55 103 54 6

2 110.0 115.0 8:58 175.7 0.38 378 72 70 1.35 1.55 105 55 6

2 115.0 120.0 9:03 179.42 0.38 378 72 70 1.35 1.55 107 57 6

3 120.0 125.0 9:08 183.11 0.36 378 73 70 1.28 1.5 110 58 6

3 125.0 130.0 9:13 186.85 0.36 377 73 71 1.28 1.5 111 60 6

3 130.0 135.0 9:18 190.59 0.36 377 73 71 1.28 1.5 112 61 6

4 135.0 140.0 9:23 194.28 0.32 377 73 71 1.14 1.3 115 62 5.5

4 140.0 145.0 9:28 197.83 0.32 376 73 71 1.14 1.3 114 63 5.5

4 145.0 150.0 9:33 201.42 0.32 375 74 71 1.14 1.3 109 63 5.5

5 150.0 155.0 9:38 204.95 0.27 344 74 71 0.96 1.1 109 62 5

5 155.0 160.0 9:43 208.2 0.26 332 73 71 0.92 1.1 108 62 5

5 160.0 165.0 9:48 211.45 0.26 334 73 71 0.92 1.1 107 56 5

6 165.0 170.0 9:53 214.72 0.26 340 74 71 0.92 1.1 101 56 5

6 170.0 175.0 9:58 218.02 0.26 329 74 71 0.92 1.1 100 56 5

6 175.0 180.0 10:03 221.23 0.27 332 74 72 0.96 1.1 100 57 5

180.0 10:08 224.414

Average: 123.78 0.32 345.4 71.3 69.2 1.15 1.29 105.0 #DIV/0! 55.1 5

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A Probe # ACP-8 Pollutant CR+6 Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post

Company OWENS DGM # 49-5 Method 61 Total Points 12 10:53 14:00 15.0/0.008 8.0/0.003

Location WAXAHACHIE, TXRate (cfm) 0.669 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 15.0

Source V-1 DEP STACKDelta ∆H@ 1.373 Date 19-Aug-10 Time/reading 5.0

Operator LEE Bws (%) 8.90 # of Ports 2 Total Run 180.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 240.5 Cp 0.833 Ps (in Hg) 29.25

Barometric 29.27 Silica Gel Weight Gain 15.3 DGM Y 1.012 Pm (in Hg) 29.36 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.3 Actual Dn (in) 0.304 O2 (%) 19.3 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00050 CO2 (%) 0.9 Md 28.92 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) 1.29 Ms 27.94 Act. Flow (cfm) 16,981 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column

Vmnstd 120.73 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.32 Total Vol.(cf) 120.4 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 11,091

Moisture % 9.07 Preliminary Ts (oF) 345 Est. Us (ft/s) 40.1 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 10,104

Preliminary Tm (oF) 70 Theor Dn (in) 0.3087 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch"

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp. 

(*F)

Filter Temp 

(*F)

Imp temp. 

(*F) Pump Vac.

1 0.0 5.0 10:53 234.72 0.34 381 71 71 1.36 1.35 93 81 4

1 5.0 10.0 10:58 238.21 0.33 381 72 71 1.32 1.3 92 63 4

1 10.0 15.0 11:03 241.7 0.37 381 72 71 1.48 1.5 93 57 4

2 15.0 20.0 11:08 245.25 0.38 381 74 71 1.52 1.5 101 52 4

2 20.0 25.0 11:13 248.59 0.39 381 75 72 1.56 1.55 104 56 4.5

2 25.0 30.0 11:18 252.19 0.40 381 75 72 1.60 1.6 104 58 4.5

3 30.0 35.0 11:23 255.79 0.38 381 75 72 1.52 1.5 104 58 4.5

3 35.0 40.0 11:28 259.47 0.38 381 76 72 1.52 1.5 103 60 4.5

3 40.0 45.0 11:33 263.18 0.38 381 76 72 1.52 1.5 105 60 4.5

4 45.0 50.0 11:38 266.87 0.34 380 76 73 1.36 1.35 104 61 4

4 50.0 55.0 11:43 270.32 0.34 379 76 73 1.36 1.35 105 61 4

4 55.0 60.0 11:48 273.8 0.34 379 77 73 1.36 1.35 105 61 4

5 60.0 65.0 11:53 277.25 0.27 347 77 73 1.08 1.1 105 62 3.5

5 65.0 70.0 11:58 280.5 0.27 332 78 74 1.08 1.1 104 63 3.5

5 70.0 75.0 12:03 283.75 0.27 327 78 74 1.08 1.1 104 65 3.5

6 75.0 80.0 12:08 287.15 0.22 164 79 74 0.88 0.88 105 66 3

6 80.0 85.0 12:13 289.92 0.25 175 79 75 1.00 1 104 63 3.5

6 85.0 90.0 12:18 293.02 0.25 183 79 75 1.00 1 106 61 3.5

1 90.0 95.0 12:30 296.208 0.33 376 77 75 1.32 1.3 102 72 5

1 95.0 100.0 12:35 299.77 0.33 381 78 76 1.32 1.3 103 61 5

1 100.0 105.0 12:40 303.04 0.32 381 78 76 1.28 1.3 104 62 5

2 105.0 110.0 12:45 306.56 0.36 381 79 76 1.44 1.45 107 62 6

2 110.0 115.0 12:50 310.2 0.37 381 80 76 1.48 1.5 107 66 6

2 115.0 120.0 12:55 313.86 0.37 381 80 77 1.48 1.5 107 65 6

3 120.0 125.0 13:00 317.45 0.37 381 81 77 1.48 1.5 107 63 6

3 125.0 130.0 13:05 321.17 0.37 381 81 77 1.48 1.5 108 65 6

3 130.0 135.0 13:10 324.83 0.36 380 81 77 1.44 1.45 108 63 6

4 135.0 140.0 13:15 328.47 0.36 380 82 78 1.44 1.45 108 66 6

4 140.0 145.0 13:20 332.13 0.35 380 82 78 1.40 1.4 108 68 6

4 145.0 150.0 13:25 335.77 0.34 381 82 78 1.36 1.35 109 67 6

5 150.0 155.0 13:30 339.3 0.34 335 83 78 1.36 1.35 107 62 6

5 155.0 160.0 13:35 342.8 0.29 231 83 79 1.16 1.15 107 63 5.5

5 160.0 165.0 13:40 346.11 0.29 230 83 79 1.16 1.15 107 63 5.5

6 165.0 170.0 13:45 349.44 0.25 175 83 79 1.00 1 107 64 5

6 170.0 175.0 13:50 352.54 0.24 120 83 79 0.96 0.96 105 66 5

6 175.0 180.0 13:55 355.36 0.25 138 83 80 1.00 1 106 67 5

180.0 14:00 358.79

Average: 124.07 0.33 330.2 78.4 75.1 1.31 1.31 104.4 #DIV/0! 63.1388889 4.8

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A Probe # T4-E-7 Pollutant HCL Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company BTEC DGM # 52-3 Method 26A Total Points 12 9:37 10:42 15.0/0.004 15.0

Location WAXAHACHIE, TXRate (cfm) 0.665 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 5.0

Source V-1 DEP STACKDelta ∆H@ 1.41 Date 8/18/10 Time/reading 5.0Operator GILLEN Bws (%) 9.21 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 72.7 Cp 0.812 Ps (in Hg) 29.28Barometric 29.30 Silica Gel Weight Gain 14.2 DGM Y 0.982 Pm (in Hg) 29.43 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.3 Actual Dn (in) 0.304 O2 (%) 19.4 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00050 CO2 (%) 0.9 Md 28.92 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) 1.80 Ms 27.91 Act. Flow (cfm) 16,881 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 39.80 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.41 Total Vol.(cf) 39.9 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 10,385

Moisture % 9.32 Preliminary Ts (oF) 382 Est. Us (ft/s) 45.1 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 9,429

Preliminary Tm (oF) 0 Theor Dn (in) 0.3200 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 5.0 9:37 522.84 0.38 378 68 68 1.37 1.65 2

2 5.0 10.0 9:42 526.62 0.37 379 69 69 1.34 1.6 2

3 10.0 15.0 9:47 530.52 0.37 380 70 69 1.34 1.6 24 15.0 20.0 9:52 533.71 0.31 380 71 69 1.12 1.35 2

5 20.0 25.0 9:57 537.41 0.25 379 72 69 0.90 1.1 2

6 25.0 30.0 10:02 540.54 0.19 379 73 70 0.69 0.83 2

1 30.0 35.0 10:12 543.19 0.37 380 72 70 1.34 1.6 22 35.0 40.0 10:17 547.31 0.38 380 73 70 1.37 1.65 23 40.0 45.0 10:22 550.39 0.38 381 73 70 1.37 1.65 24 45.0 50.0 10:27 554.31 0.34 381 74 71 1.23 1.5 25 50.0 55.0 10:32 557.96 0.30 381 74 71 1.08 1.3 26 55.0 60.0 10:37 560.42 0.24 380 74 71 0.87 1.05 2

60.0 10:42 564.48

Average: 41.64 0.323 379.8 71.9 69.8 1.17 1.41 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A Probe # T4-E-7 Pollutant HCL Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company BTEC DGM # 52-3 Method 26A Total Points 12 11:40 13:05 15.0/0.000 8.0/

Location WAXAHACHIE, TXRate (cfm) 0.665 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 5.0

Source V-1 DEP STACKDelta ∆H@ 1.4 Date 8/18/10 Time/reading 5.0Operator GILLEN Bws (%) 8.92 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 74.5 Cp 0.812 Ps (in Hg) 29.30Barometric 29.32 Silica Gel Weight Gain 8.2 DGM Y 0.982 Pm (in Hg) 29.45 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.3 Actual Dn (in) 0.304 O2 (%) 19.4 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00050 CO2 (%) 0.9 Md 28.92 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) 1.80 Ms 27.95 Act. Flow (cfm) 16,886 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 39.74 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.41 Total Vol.(cf) 39.9 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 10,332

Moisture % 8.92 Preliminary Ts (oF) 382 Est. Us (ft/s) 45.2 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 9,410

Preliminary Tm (oF) 0 Theor Dn (in) 0.3193 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 5.0 11:40 564.67 0.35 381 73 72 1.26 1.50 2

2 5.0 10.0 11:45 568.39 0.38 385 74 72 1.37 1.65 23 10.0 15.0 11:50 572.44 0.35 385 76 73 1.26 1.50 24 15.0 20.0 11:55 575.82 0.35 385 77 73 1.26 1.50 25 20.0 25.0 12:00 579.19 0.34 385 78 74 1.23 1.50 26 25.0 30.0 12:05 583.42 0.23 384 78 74 0.83 1.00 2

1 30.0 35.0 12:10 586.20 0.38 384 75 74 1.37 1.65 22 35.0 40.0 12:40 589.62 0.38 386 75 74 1.37 1.65 23 40.0 45.0 12:45 593.47 0.36 387 76 74 1.30 1.60 24 45.0 50.0 12:50 597.06 0.32 387 78 75 1.16 1.40 25 50.0 55.0 12:55 600.53 0.26 387 78 75 0.94 1.10 26 55.0 60.0 13:00 603.91 0.17 384 79 75 0.61 0.74 2

60.0 13:05 606.55

Average: 41.88 0.32 385.0 76.4 73.8 1.17 1.40 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A Probe # T4-E-7 Pollutant HCL Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company BTEC DGM # 52-3 Method 26A Total Points 12 13:35 14:45 15.0/0.000 7.5/

Location WAXAHACHIE, TXRate (cfm) 0.665 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 5.0

Source V-1 DEP STACK Delta ∆H@ 1.42 Date 8/18/10 Time/reading 5.0Operator GILLEN Bws (%) 9.70 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 81.4 Cp 0.812 Ps (in Hg) 29.30Barometric 29.32 Silica Gel Weight Gain 9.3 DGM Y 0.982 Pm (in Hg) 29.45 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.3 Actual Dn (in) 0.304 O2 (%) 19.5 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00050 CO2 (%) 1.0 Md 28.94 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) 1.80 Ms 27.88 Act. Flow (cfm) 16,915 Must delete extra ze

Vmnstd 39.75 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.41 Total Vol.(cf) 39.9 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 10,379

Moisture % 9.70 Preliminary Ts (oF) 382 Est. Us (ft/s) 45.2 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 9,373

Preliminary Tm (oF) 0 Theor Dn (in) 0.3204 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do 

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 5.0 13:35 608.35 0.39 386 76 75 1.41 1.7 2

2 5.0 10.0 13:40 612.19 0.39 386 76 75 1.41 1.7 23 10.0 15.0 13:45 615.74 0.38 385 76 75 1.38 1.65 2

4 15.0 20.0 13:50 619.58 0.35 385 76 75 1.27 1.5 2

5 20.0 25.0 13:55 623.10 0.27 383 77 75 0.98 1.2 26 25.0 30.0 14:00 626.51 0.20 382 76 75 0.72 0.88 2

1 30.0 35.0 14:15 629.29 0.36 382 74 74 1.30 1.6 22 35.0 40.0 14:20 632.45 0.36 381 75 74 1.30 1.6 23 40.0 45.0 14:25 636.52 0.37 382 75 74 1.34 1.6 24 45.0 50.0 14:30 640.07 0.34 382 75 74 1.23 1.5 25 50.0 55.0 14:35 643.64 0.30 382 76 74 1.09 1.3 26 55.0 60.0 14:40 647.27 0.18 375 76 73 0.65 0.79 2

60.0 14:45 650.24

Average: 41.89 0.32 382.6 75.7 74.4 1.17 1.42 24

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A-OH Probe # 54-5-1 Pollutant FLOWS Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post

Company OWENS CORNINGDGM # T4-3 Method 4 Total Points 12 14:45 16:45 18.0/0.000 12.0/0.000

Location WAXAHACHIE, TXRate (cfm) 0.418 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 5.0

Source V-1 Delta ∆H@ Date 21-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0

Operator LEE/PILGRIM Bws (%) 8.96 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 88.9 Cp 0.798 Ps (in Hg) 29.38

Barometric 29.39 Silica Gel Weight Gain 15.6 DGM Y 1.007 Pm (in Hg) 29.39 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.2 Actual Dn (in) O2 (%) 20.2 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00000 CO2 (%) 0.9 Md 28.95 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 27.97 Act. Flow (cfm) 16,218 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column

Vmnstd 49.97 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 25.1 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 10,263

Moisture % 8.96 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 9,344

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch"

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp. 

(*F)

Filter Temp 

(*F)

Imp temp. 

(*F) Pump Vac.

1 0.0 5.0 14:45 822.750 0.32 355 73 74 0.00 0.60 252 249 82 2

2 5.0 10.0 14:50 825.04 0.35 360 73 74 0.00 0.60 251 250 67 2

3 10.0 15.0 14:55 828.01 0.36 363 76 74 0.00 0.60 250 250 65 2

4 15.0 20.0 15:00 830.16 0.35 363 76 74 0.00 0.60 250 249 64 2

5 20.0 25.0 15:05 831.92 0.31 359 76 74 0.00 0.60 251 250 64 2

6 25.0 30.0 15:10 833.84 0.24 350 76 74 0.00 0.60 249 250 63 2

1 30.0 35.0 15:15 835.580 0.30 356 76 75 0.00 0.60 251 250 63 2

2 35.0 40.0 15:20 838.26 0.34 360 76 75 0.00 0.60 249 250 63 2

3 40.0 45.0 15:25 839.83 0.35 362 77 75 0.00 0.60 249 249 64 2

4 45.0 50.0 15:30 842.28 0.35 364 78 75 0.00 0.60 251 249 64 2

5 50.0 55.0 15:35 843.88 0.31 366 78 75 0.00 0.60 250 250 62 2

6 55.0 60.0 15:40 846.13 0.22 352 79 76 0.00 0.60 249 250 61 2

60.0 65.0 15:45 848.40 0.31 78 76 0.60 250 251 61 2

65.0 70.0 15:50 856.61 0.35 78 76 0.60 251 250 61 2

70.0 75.0 15:55 853.01 0.35 78 75 0.60 251 250 60 2

75.0 80.0 16:00 854.92 0.35 78 75 0.60 250 251 60 2

80.0 85.0 16:05 856.91 0.32 78 75 0.60 250 250 61 2

85.0 90.0 16:10 858.94 0.22 78 75 0.60 249 251 61 2

90.0 95.0 16:15 862.97 0.31 77 74 0.60 249 248 62 2

95.0 100.0 16:20 863.82 0.34 77 74 0.60 249 247 62 2

100.0 105.0 16:25 865.47 0.36 76 73 0.60 250 250 62 2

105.0 110.0 16:30 867.87 0.35 76 73 0.60 250 252 63 2

110.0 115.0 16:35 869.76 0.30 75 72 0.60 251 250 64 2

115.0 120.0 16:40 872.13 0.23 75 71 0.60 250 251 64 2

END 120.0 120.0 16:45 874.011

Average: 51.261 0.32 359.2 76.6 74.3 0.00 0.60 250 250 63.4583333 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A-OH Probe # 54-5-1 Pollutant FLOWS Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post

Company OWENS CORNINGDGM # T4-3 Method 4 Total Points 12 8:20 10:20 14.0/0.000 12.0/0.000

Location WAXAHACHIE, TXRate (cfm) 0.417 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 5.0

Source V-1 Delta ∆H@ Date 22-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0

Operator LEE/PILGRIM Bws (%) 9.67 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 101.6 Cp 0.798 Ps (in Hg) 29.31

Barometric 29.33 Silica Gel Weight Gain 11.9 DGM Y 1.007 Pm (in Hg) 29.33 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.3 Actual Dn (in) O2 (%) 20.3 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00000 CO2 (%) 1.1 Md 28.99 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 27.93 Act. Flow (cfm) 15,839 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column

Vmnstd 49.92 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 25.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 9,770

Moisture % 9.67 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 8,825

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch"

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp. 

(*F)

Filter Temp 

(*F)

Imp temp. 

(*F) Pump Vac.

1 0.0 5.0 8:20 874.750 0.31 364 64 64 0.00 0.60 250 253 64 2

2 5.0 10.0 8:25 877.04 0.35 371 64 65 0.00 0.60 250 251 63 2

3 10.0 15.0 8:30 879.50 0.34 379 65 65 0.00 0.60 249 250 62 2

4 15.0 20.0 8:35 881.12 0.32 382 66 65 0.00 0.60 250 252 61 2

5 20.0 25.0 8:40 883.04 0.28 380 66 65 0.00 0.60 250 251 61 2

6 25.0 30.0 8:45 885.13 0.22 377 67 65 0.00 0.60 250 249 60 2

1 30.0 35.0 8:50 887.320 0.28 380 67 65 0.00 0.60 250 249 60 2

2 35.0 40.0 8:55 889.25 0.33 382 68 65 0.00 0.60 250 250 59 2

3 40.0 45.0 9:00 891.29 0.33 384 68 65 0.00 0.60 250 249 59 2

4 45.0 50.0 9:05 893.56 0.30 383 69 66 0.00 0.60 250 249 59 2

5 50.0 55.0 9:10 895.76 0.25 382 69 66 0.00 0.60 250 249 59 2

6 55.0 60.0 9:15 897.79 0.22 378 70 66 0.00 0.60 250 250 59 2

60.0 65.0 9:20 899.94 0.32 70 66 0.60 250 249 59 2

65.0 70.0 9:25 902.28 0.35 71 67 0.60 250 249 60 2

70.0 75.0 9:30 904.11 0.35 72 67 0.60 250 252 60 2

75.0 80.0 9:35 906.39 0.33 72 67 0.60 250 249 61 2

80.0 85.0 9:40 908.76 0.30 72 68 0.60 251 251 61 2

85.0 90.0 9:45 911.02 0.20 72 68 0.60 250 250 62 2

90.0 95.0 9:50 913.49 0.30 72 68 0.60 250 251 62 2

95.0 100.0 9:55 915.12 0.33 72 68 0.60 249 250 63 2

100.0 105.0 10:00 916.87 0.34 73 68 0.60 249 250 63 2

105.0 110.0 10:05 918.92 0.35 73 68 0.60 251 250 63 2

110.0 115.0 10:10 921.33 0.30 73 68 0.60 250 251 64 2

115.0 120.0 10:15 923.02 0.19 73 68 0.60 249 251 64 2

END 120.0 120.0 10:20 925.355

Average: 50.605 0.30 378.5 69.5 66.4 0.00 0.60 250 250 61.1666667 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A-OH Probe # 54-5-1 Pollutant FLOWS Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post

Company OWENS CORNINGDGM # T4-3 Method 4 Total Points 12 10:35 13:30 15.0/0.000 12.0/0.000

Location WAXAHACHIE, TXRate (cfm) 0.419 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 5.0

Source V-1 Delta ∆H@ Date 22-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0

Operator LEE/PILGRIM Bws (%) 9.58 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 97.9 Cp 0.798 Ps (in Hg) 29.33

Barometric 29.35 Silica Gel Weight Gain 15 DGM Y 1.007 Pm (in Hg) 29.35 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.3 Actual Dn (in) O2 (%) 20.3 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00000 CO2 (%) 1.0 Md 28.97 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 27.92 Act. Flow (cfm) 15,505 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column

Vmnstd 50.14 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 25.1 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 9,649

Moisture % 9.58 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 8,725

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch"

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp. 

(*F)

Filter Temp 

(*F)

Imp temp. 

(*F) Pump Vac.

1 0.0 5.0 10:35 925.870 0.27 365 72 71 0.00 0.60 251 250 72 2

2 5.0 10.0 10:40 928.04 0.33 371 73 71 0.00 0.60 251 248 67 2

3 10.0 15.0 10:45 930.22 0.34 373 73 72 0.00 0.60 250 252 66 2

4 15.0 20.0 11:45 932.39 0.32 372 69 70 0.00 0.60 251 250 70 2

5 20.0 25.0 11:50 934.66 0.26 373 69 69 0.00 0.60 251 249 65 2

6 25.0 30.0 11:55 936.84 0.19 369 70 69 0.00 0.60 250 249 64 2

1 30.0 35.0 12:00 938.960 0.28 369 70 69 0.00 0.60 249 245 64 2

2 35.0 40.0 12:05 941.22 0.32 373 71 69 0.00 0.60 251 249 63 2

3 40.0 45.0 12:10 943.35 0.34 375 72 69 0.00 0.60 249 249 63 2

4 45.0 50.0 12:15 945.11 0.31 375 73 70 0.00 0.60 251 250 61 2

5 50.0 55.0 12:20 947.47 0.26 375 74 70 0.00 0.60 250 253 60 2

6 55.0 60.0 12:25 949.62 0.20 370 74 70 0.00 0.60 251 249 60 2

60.0 65.0 12:30 951.55 0.30 74 70 0.60 250 250 60 2

65.0 70.0 12:35 954.01 0.33 74 70 0.60 250 251 61 2

70.0 75.0 12:40 956.37 0.35 74 70 0.60 250 249 61 2

75.0 80.0 12:45 958.50 0.34 74 70 0.60 250 250 61 2

80.0 85.0 12:50 960.71 0.32 74 71 0.60 249 249 62 2

85.0 90.0 12:55 962.40 0.26 74 71 0.60 250 247 62 2

90.0 95.0 13:00 964.44 0.31 74 71 0.60 249 249 62 2

95.0 100.0 13:05 966.84 0.35 75 71 0.60 250 250 63 2

100.0 105.0 13:10 968.75 0.34 75 71 0.60 251 251 63 2

105.0 110.0 13:15 970.73 0.31 75 71 0.60 249 249 63 2

110.0 115.0 13:20 972.61 0.28 75 71 0.60 249 249 63 2

115.0 120.0 13:25 974.70 0.24 75 71 0.60 249 249 63 2

END 120.0 120.0 13:30 977.020

Average: 51.150 0.30 371.7 73.0 70.3 0.00 0.60 250 249 63.2916667 2

Leak Check





























































Appendix D:

Equipment Calibration Documents






















































Appendix E:

Laboratory Analytical Reports
Acetone 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL)

Particulate 

Weight in 

Acetone 

(mg)

Filter 

(mg)

Organic 

(mg)

Inorganic 

(mg)

Acetone 

(mg)

Filter 

(mg)

Filterable 

PM2.5 Catch 

Weight (mg)

PM

W

V1 Furnace Run 1 100.00 1.70 7.20 2.10 140.00 1.70 7.20 8.90 V1 Furnace Run 2 68.00 1.00 9.30 1.20 120.00 1.00 9.30 10.30 V1 Furnace Run 3 89.00 0.80 7.60 1.10 120.00 0.80 7.60 8.40 

Blank: 150.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 4.30

Blank results were non-detect for acetone and organic

Corrected

OTM 27/28 PM2.5 Lab Results Blank Correction

Owens Corning

Waxahachie, Texas

BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03

Sampling Date: August 17 & 18, 2010
Rinse 

Volume 

(mL)

Acetone 

Catch 

(mg)

Weight 

on Filter 

(mg)

Acetone 

(mg)

Filter 

(mg)

Ace + 

Filter 

(mg)

V1 Furnace Run 1 87.0 4.2 3.6 4.2 3.6 7.8

V1 Furnace Run 2 69.0 1.4 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.4

V1 Furnace Run 3 95.0 2.0 7.2 2.0 7.2 9.2

Blank 97.00 0.00 0.50 0.50

Acetone blank result was non-detect

Corrected

Method 5 PM Lab Results

Owens Corning

Waxahachie, Texas

BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03

Sampling Date: August 18 & 19, 2010
Compound/Fraction

Blank 

Filter 

Result

(μg)

Blank 

Filter 

Detection 

Limit

(μg)

Run 1 

Result

(μg)

Run 2 

Result

(μg)

Run 3 

Result

(μg)

Test Run 

Detection 

Limit

(μg)

Run 1

(μg)

Run 2

(μg)

Antimony ND 0.40 ND ND ND 2.0 2.00 2.00 

Arsenic ND 0.40 2.8 2.6 3.8 2.0 2.80 2.60 

Berylium ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 

Cadmium ND 0.10 1.19 2.06 2.72 0.50 1.19 2.06 

Chromium 1.69 0.30 30.5 26.1 31.0 1.5 28.81 24.41 

Cobalt ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 

Lead 1.23 0.20 3.9 4.1 7.1 1.0 2.67 2.87 

Manganese 0.98 0.75 4.7 5.1 4.8 3.8 3.72 4.12 

Nickel ND 0.50 3.8 ND ND 2.5 3.80 2.50 

Selenium ND 1.0 394 288 256 5.0 394.00 288.00 

Owens Corning

Method 29 Lab Results

Correcte

Sampling Date: August 18 & 19, 2010

BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03

Waxahachie, Texas
Corrected

Total Volume 

(ml)

Impinger 

KOH (ml)

Hexavalent 

Chromium, 

Cr6+ [μg]

Hexavalent 

Chromium, 

Cr6+ [μg]

V1 Furnace Run 1 780 300 13 11.54

V1 Furnace Run 2 840 300 16 14.43

V1 Furnace Run 3 810 300 17 15.48

Blank H2O 430 ND

Blank KOH 480 0.90

Method 0061 Lab Results

Sampling Date: August 18 & 19, 2010

BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03

Waxahachie, Texas

Owens Corning
Your Project #: 10-286A 

Site: OWENS CORNING

Your C.O.C. #: 0698

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/09/10

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0B6106

Received: 2010/08/24, 11:00

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 9

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) (1 ) 5 2010/09/02 2010/09/07 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28 

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) (1 ) 5 2010/09/02 2010/09/09 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28 

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) (2 ) 4 N/A 2010/09/02 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM - 027 

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) (2 ) 3 2010/08/27 2010/09/07 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM - 027 

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) (2 ) 1 2010/08/27 2010/09/07 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/09/01 

Weight of DCM Received 5 N/A 2010/09/10 

Weight of Water from Impingers 5 N/A 2010/09/10 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This is a non-accredited test.

(2) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: Lina.Barreto@maxxamanalytics.com

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0B6106 Client Project #: 10-286A

Report Date: 2010/09/10 Project name: OWENS CORNING

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID G Y 0 1 3 2 G Y 0 1 3 3 G Y 0 1 3 4

Sampling Date 2010/08/17 2010/08/17 2010/08/17

11:55 11:15 14:30

COC Number 0698 0698 0698

 U n i t s TB-OWENS RB-OWENS R1-OWENS RDL QC Batch

CORNING-OTM28 CORNING-OTM28 CORNING-OTM28

Weight g 170 150 360 0.1 2253700

DCM Weight g 150 180 220 0.1 2253686

Inorganic Condensible PM mg 4.3 2.2 140 0.50 2253698

Organic Condensible PM mg ND ND 2.1 1.0 2253682

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID G Y 0 1 3 5 G Y 0 1 6 2 G Y 0 1 6 6

Sampling Date 2010/08/17 2010/08/18 2010/08/17

19:40 13:50 11:15

COC Number 0698 0698

 U n i t s R2-OWENS R3-OWENS RB-OWENS RDL QC Batch

CORNING-OTM28 CORNING-OTM28 CORNING-OTM27

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 0.5 2248845

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.40 0.30 2248843

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 150 1 2248855

Weight g 330 290 0.1 2253700

DCM Weight g 220 93 0.1 2253686

Inorganic Condensible PM mg 120 120 0.50 2253698

Organic Condensible PM mg 1.2 1.1 1.0 2253682

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0B6106 Client Project #: 10-286A

Report Date: 2010/09/10 Project name: OWENS CORNING

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID G Y 0 1 9 9 G Y 0 2 0 0 G Y 0 2 0 1

Sampling Date 2010/08/17 2010/08/17 2010/08/18

14:30 19:40 13:50

COC Number

 U n i t s R1-OWENS R2-OWENS R3-OWENS RDL QC Batch

CORNING-OTM27 CORNING-OTM27 CORNING-OTM27

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 1.7 1.0 0.8 0.5 2248849

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg 7.20 9.30 7.60 0.30 2248843

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5 - 10) ml 90 58 58 1 2248855

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 100 68 89 1 2248855

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0B6106 Client Project #: 10-286A

Report Date: 2010/09/10 Project name: OWENS CORNING

Test Summary

Maxxam ID GY0132 Collected 2010/08/17

Sample ID TB-OWENS CORNING-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253682 2010/09/02 2010/09/07 FF

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253698 2010/09/02 2010/09/09 FF

Weight of DCM Received 2253686 N/A 2010/09/10 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2253700 N/A 2010/09/10 

Maxxam ID GY0133 Collected 2010/08/17

Sample ID RB-OWENS CORNING-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253682 2010/09/02 2010/09/07 FF

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253698 2010/09/02 2010/09/09 FF

Weight of DCM Received 2253686 N/A 2010/09/10 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2253700 N/A 2010/09/10 

Maxxam ID GY0134 Collected 2010/08/17

Sample ID R1-OWENS CORNING-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253682 2010/09/02 2010/09/07 FF

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253698 2010/09/02 2010/09/09 FF

Weight of DCM Received 2253686 N/A 2010/09/10 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2253700 N/A 2010/09/10 

Maxxam ID GY0135 Collected 2010/08/17

Sample ID R2-OWENS CORNING-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253682 2010/09/02 2010/09/07 FF

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253698 2010/09/02 2010/09/09 FF

Weight of DCM Received 2253686 N/A 2010/09/10 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2253700 N/A 2010/09/10 

Maxxam ID GY0162 Collected 2010/08/18

Sample ID R3-OWENS CORNING-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253682 2010/09/02 2010/09/07 FF

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253698 2010/09/02 2010/09/09 FF

Weight of DCM Received 2253686 N/A 2010/09/10 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2253700 N/A 2010/09/10 

Page 4 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0B6106 Client Project #: 10-286A

Report Date: 2010/09/10 Project name: OWENS CORNING

Test Summary

Maxxam ID GY0166 Collected 2010/08/17

Sample ID RB-OWENS CORNING-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2248843 N/A 2010/09/02 BLM

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2248845 2010/08/27 2010/09/07 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2248855 N/A 2010/09/01 BLM

Maxxam ID GY0199 Collected 2010/08/17

Sample ID R1-OWENS CORNING-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2248843 N/A 2010/09/02 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2248849 2010/08/27 2010/09/07 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2248855 N/A 2010/09/01 BLM

Maxxam ID GY0200 Collected 2010/08/17

Sample ID R2-OWENS CORNING-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2248843 N/A 2010/09/02 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2248849 2010/08/27 2010/09/07 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2248855 N/A 2010/09/01 BLM

Maxxam ID GY0201 Collected 2010/08/18

Sample ID R3-OWENS CORNING-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2248843 N/A 2010/09/02 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2248849 2010/08/27 2010/09/07 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2248855 N/A 2010/09/01 BLM

Page 5 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0B6106 Client Project #: 10-286A

Report Date: 2010/09/10 Project name: OWENS CORNING

GENERAL COMMENTS

Sample GY0132-01: Organic Extraction: Very little residue noted in Vial

Inorganic Extraction: Whitish residue found in metal dish

Sample GY0133-01: Organic Extraction: Very little residue noted in Vial

Inorganic Extraction: Whitish residue found in metal dish

Sample GY0134-01: Organic Extraction: Brownish residue found in Vial

Inorganic Extraction: Much of yellowish oily material found in the metal dish

Sample GY0135-01: Organic Extraction: Whitish residue found in Vial

Inorganic Extraction: Brownish oily material found in metal dish

Sample GY0162-01: Organic Extraction: Light yellowish residue found in Vial

Inorganic Extraction: Yellowish oily material found in metal dish

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027): Maxxam # Filter Condition

GY0166-01Rnormal

GY0199-01RDE/LFT

GY0200-01Rnormal

GY0201-01RFT

Normal Filters received in normal condition

LFT Loose filter material in the petri dish

DE Edges of the filter are frayed

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 6 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-286A

P.O. #:

Project name: OWENS CORNING

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0B6106

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2248845 BLM Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2010/09/07 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2248849 BLM Method Blank < 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse 2010/09/07 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2253682 FF Spiked Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/09/07 93 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank DUP Organic Condensible PM 2010/09/07 94 % 70 - 130

RPD Organic Condensible PM 2010/09/07 1.1 % 20

Method Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/09/07 ND, RDL=1.0 mg

2253698 FF Method Blank Inorganic Condensible PM 2010/09/09 ND, RDL=0.50 mg

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 7 of 7
Your Project #: 10-286A 

Site: OWENS CORNING

Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/09/08

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0B6161

Received: 2010/08/24, 11:00

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 5

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. (1 ) 5 2010/09/03 2010/09/03 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A 

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 5 N/A 2010/09/03 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: Lina.Barreto@maxxamanalytics.com

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0B6161 Client Project #: 10-286A

Report Date: 2010/09/08 Project name: OWENS CORNING

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID G Y 0 3 4 8 G Y 0 3 4 9 G Y 0 3 5 0 G Y 0 3 5 0 G Y 0 3 5 1

Sampling Date 2010/08/18 2010/08/18 2010/08/18 2010/08/18 2010/08/18

13:35 13:35 10:55 10:55 13:30

COC Number N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

 U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M26A BLANK-H2SO4-M26A RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-H2SO4-M26A 1-H2SO4-M26A 2-H2SO4-M26A

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 280 180 370 320 1 2256091

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND ND ND ND 200 2257351

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND 1900 1900 2100 200 2257351

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID G Y 0 3 5 2

Sampling Date 2010/08/18

15:30

COC Number N/A

 U n i t s RUN RDL QC Batch

3-H2SO4-M26A

Volume ml 390 1 2256091

Hydrochloric Acid ug 440 200 2257351

Hydrofluoric Acid ug 2000 200 2257351

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0B6161 Client Project #: 10-286A

Report Date: 2010/09/08 Project name: OWENS CORNING

Test Summary

Maxxam ID GY0348 Collected 2010/08/18

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2257351 2010/09/03 2010/09/03 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2256091 N/A 2010/09/03 A_S

Maxxam ID GY0349 Collected 2010/08/18

Sample ID BLANK-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2257351 2010/09/03 2010/09/03 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2256091 N/A 2010/09/03 A_S

Maxxam ID GY0350 Collected 2010/08/18

Sample ID RUN 1-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2257351 2010/09/03 2010/09/03 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2256091 N/A 2010/09/03 A_S

Maxxam ID GY0350 D u p Collected 2010/08/18

Sample ID RUN 1-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2257351 2010/09/07 2010/09/03 A_S

Maxxam ID GY0351 Collected 2010/08/18

Sample ID RUN 2-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2257351 2010/09/03 2010/09/03 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2256091 N/A 2010/09/03 A_S

Maxxam ID GY0352 Collected 2010/08/18

Sample ID RUN 3-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2257351 2010/09/03 2010/09/03 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2256091 N/A 2010/09/03 A_S

Page 3 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0B6161 Client Project #: 10-286A

Report Date: 2010/09/08 Project name: OWENS CORNING

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 4 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-286A

P.O. #:

Project name: OWENS CORNING

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0B6161

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2257351 A_S Matrix Spike

(GY0350) Hydrochloric Acid 2010/09/03 100 % 80 - 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/09/03 102 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/09/03 102 % 90 - 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/09/03 102 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/09/03 ND, RDL=200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/09/03 ND, RDL=200 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2010/09/03 NC % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/09/03 3.0 % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 5 of 5
Your Project #: 10-286A 

Site: OWENS CORNING-FIBER GLASS ICR

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/09/07

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0B6250

Received: 2010/08/25, 11:30

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals in Combined Train (6020) (1 ) 4 2010/09/02 2010/09/02 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29 

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) (1 ) 4 2010/08/26 2010/09/01 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315 

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) (1 ) 4 N/A 2010/09/01 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/08/30 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: Lina.Barreto@maxxamanalytics.com

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 1 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0B6250 Client Project #: 10-286A

Report Date: 2010/09/07 Project name: OWENS CORNING-FIBER GLASS ICR

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID G Y 0 7 9 4 G Y 0 7 9 6 G Y 0 7 9 7 G Y 0 7 9 8

Sampling Date 2010/08/19 2010/08/18 2010/08/19 2010/08/19

07:45 20:00 11:30 14:50

 U n i t s RB-M5/29-FILT RUN 1-M5/29 RUN 2-M5/29 RUN 3-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 4.2 1.4 2.0 0.5 2247344

Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.50 3.60 ND 7.20 0.30 2247341

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 97 87 69 95 1 2247346

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0B6250 Client Project #: 10-286A

Report Date: 2010/09/07 Project name: OWENS CORNING-FIBER GLASS ICR

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID G Y 0 7 9 4 G Y 0 7 9 6 G Y 0 7 9 6 G Y 0 7 9 7

Sampling Date 2010/08/19 2010/08/18 2010/08/18 2010/08/19

07:45 20:00 20:00 11:30

 U n i t s RB-M5/29-FILT RDL RUN 1-M5/29 RUN RUN 2-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 Lab-Dup

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.40 ND ND ND 2.0 2254565

Total Arsenic (As) ug ND 0.40 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.0 2254565

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.50 2254565

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug ND 0.10 1.19 1.14 2.06 0.50 2254565

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 1.69 0.30 30.5 31.4 26.1 1.5 2254565

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.50 2254565

Total Lead (Pb) ug 1.23 0.20 3.9 4.0 4.1 1.0 2254565

Total Manganese (Mn) ug 0.98 0.75 4.7 4.8 5.1 3.8 2254565

Total Nickel (Ni) ug ND 0.50 3.8 3.9 ND 2.5 2254565

Total Selenium (Se) ug ND 1.0 394 406 288 5.0 2254565

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID G Y 0 7 9 8

Sampling Date 2010/08/19

14:50

 U n i t s RUN 3-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 2.0 2254565

Total Arsenic (As) ug 3.8 2.0 2254565

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.50 2254565

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug 2.72 0.50 2254565

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 31.0 1.5 2254565

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.50 2254565

Total Lead (Pb) ug 7.1 1.0 2254565

Total Manganese (Mn) ug 4.8 3.8 2254565

Total Nickel (Ni) ug ND 2.5 2254565

Total Selenium (Se) ug 256 5.0 2254565

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0B6250 Client Project #: 10-286A

Report Date: 2010/09/07 Project name: OWENS CORNING-FIBER GLASS ICR

Test Summary

Maxxam ID GY0794 Collected 2010/08/19

Sample ID RB-M5/29-FILT Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2254565 2010/09/02 2010/09/02 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2247344 2010/08/26 2010/09/01 BLM

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2247341 N/A 2010/09/01 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2247346 N/A 2010/08/30 BLM

Maxxam ID GY0796 Collected 2010/08/18

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2254565 2010/09/02 2010/09/02 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2247344 2010/08/26 2010/09/01 BLM

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2247341 N/A 2010/09/01 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2247346 N/A 2010/08/30 BLM

Maxxam ID GY0796 D u p Collected 2010/08/18

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2254565 2010/09/02 2010/09/02 N_R

Maxxam ID GY0797 Collected 2010/08/19

Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2254565 2010/09/02 2010/09/02 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2247344 2010/08/26 2010/09/01 BLM

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2247341 N/A 2010/09/01 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2247346 N/A 2010/08/30 BLM

Maxxam ID GY0798 Collected 2010/08/19

Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2254565 2010/09/02 2010/09/02 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2247344 2010/08/26 2010/09/01 BLM

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2247341 N/A 2010/09/01 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2247346 N/A 2010/08/30 BLM

Page 4 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0B6250 Client Project #: 10-286A

Report Date: 2010/09/07 Project name: OWENS CORNING-FIBER GLASS ICR

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201): Negative weights observed, see filter comments below

Maxxam # Filter Condition

GY0794-01Rnormal

GY0796-01RDE/LFT

GY0797-01RDE/LFT

GY0798-01Rnormal

Normal Filters received in normal condition

LFT Loose filter material in the petri dish

DE Edges of the filter are frayed

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals in Combined Train (6020): Extra 5x dilution was required for all samples except GY0794, due to the matrix.

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample GY0796.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-286A

P.O. #:

Project name: OWENS CORNING-FIBER GLASS ICR

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0B6250

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2247344 BLM Method Blank Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse 2010/09/01 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2254565 N_R Matrix Spike

(GY0796) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 102 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(GY0796) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 100 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 2.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(GY0796) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 95 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(GY0796) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 97 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 2.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(GY0796) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 117 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(GY0796) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 113 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 3.5 % 20

Matrix Spike

(GY0796) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 101 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(GY0796) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 100 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(GY0796) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 103 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(GY0796) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 103 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(GY0796) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 102 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(GY0796) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 103 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(GY0796) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 104 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(GY0796) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 106 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 1.9 % 20

Matrix Spike

(GY0796) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 105 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(GY0796) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 105 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(GY0796) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 99 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(GY0796) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 99 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(GY0796) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 96 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(GY0796) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 96 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 0 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 99 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 98 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 1.2 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 94 % 85 - 115

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 6 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-286A

P.O. #:

Project name: OWENS CORNING-FIBER GLASS ICR

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0B6250

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2254565 N_R Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 96 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 2.5 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 108 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 110 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 2.6 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 97 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 97 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 0.2 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 99 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 0.6 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 100 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 102 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 1.9 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 101 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 101 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 0.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 101 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 102 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 0.3 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 96 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 98 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 2.4 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 94 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 95 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 1.8 % 20

Method Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 7 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-286A

P.O. #:

Project name: OWENS CORNING-FIBER GLASS ICR

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0B6250

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2254565 N_R RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 2.9 % 20

Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 3.1 % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 8 of 8
Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.

9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3

Twinsburg, OH 44087

Phone: (330) 405-0837

Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other

Client Name BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Report Number BTEnvironmental110210 Report 2

Date

Contact Name Phone

Trap I.D. Test Location Date Analyzed Scientist

 Mass ng 

Sect.1

 Mass ng 

Sect.2

Spike 

Level 

% Spike 

Recovery

Date(s) in 

Stack Comments

80304 Waxahachie, TX 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 77 0 10/21/2010 Run 1, Trap B

80320 Waxahachie, TX 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 27 0 20 10/21/2010 Run 1, Trap A

80329 Waxahachie, TX 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 77 0 10/22/2010 Run 2, Trap B

80254 Waxahachie, TX 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 27 0.1 20 10/22/2010 Run 2, Trap A

80313 Waxahachie, TX 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 83 0.1 10/22/2010 Run 3, Trap B

80323 Waxahachie, TX 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 29 0.3 20 10/22/2010 Run 3, Trap A

80296 Waxahachie, TX 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 0.1 0.4 10/22/2010 Blank, Trap B

80319 Waxahachie, TX 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 19 0.1 20 10/22/2010 Blank, Trap A

Variability +- 10%

Plant/Source Owens Corning V-1 DEP Stack 

Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

11/2/2010

Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Matthew 

Smith msmith@btecinc.com

Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush

Less than .52 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less 

than the lowest detection limit.

Calibration Report Available

(248)-548-8072 
Your Project #: 10-286A 

Site: OWENS CORNING

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/08/31

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0B6347

Received: 2010/08/25, 11:30

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 5

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 5 2010/08/25 2010/08/25 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061) 

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2010/08/25 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: Lina.Barreto@maxxamanalytics.com

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0B6347 Client Project #: 10-286A

Report Date: 2010/08/31 Project name: OWENS CORNING

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID G Y 1 1 6 5 G Y 1 1 6 6 G Y 1 1 6 7 G Y 1 1 6 7

Sampling Date 2010/08/19 2010/08/19 2010/08/18 2010/08/18

07:15 07:15 20:40 20:40

 U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M0061 BLANK-KOH-M0061 RDL RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-KOH-M0061 1-KOH-M0061

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 430 480 1 780 1 2245483

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.9 0.2 13 13 0.8 2246541

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID G Y 1 1 6 8 G Y 1 1 6 9

Sampling Date 2010/08/19 2010/08/19

11:25 15:15

 U n i t s RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

2-KOH-M0061 3-KOH-M0061

Volume ml 840 810 1 2245483

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 16 17 0.4 2246541

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0B6347 Client Project #: 10-286A

Report Date: 2010/08/31 Project name: OWENS CORNING

Test Summary

Maxxam ID GY1165 Collected 2010/08/19

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2246541 2010/08/25 2010/08/25 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2245483 N/A 2010/08/25 FMO

Maxxam ID GY1166 Collected 2010/08/19

Sample ID BLANK-KOH-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2246541 2010/08/25 2010/08/25 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2245483 N/A 2010/08/25 FMO

Maxxam ID GY1167 Collected 2010/08/18

Sample ID RUN 1-KOH-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2246541 2010/08/25 2010/08/25 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2245483 N/A 2010/08/25 FMO

Maxxam ID GY1167 D u p Collected 2010/08/18

Sample ID RUN 1-KOH-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2246541 2010/08/25 2010/08/25 LLE

Maxxam ID GY1168 Collected 2010/08/19

Sample ID RUN 2-KOH-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2246541 2010/08/25 2010/08/25 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2245483 N/A 2010/08/25 FMO

Maxxam ID GY1169 Collected 2010/08/19

Sample ID RUN 3-KOH-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2246541 2010/08/25 2010/08/25 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2245483 N/A 2010/08/25 FMO

Page 3 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0B6347 Client Project #: 10-286A

Report Date: 2010/08/31 Project name: OWENS CORNING

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061): Reagent Blank Sample noticed to contain trace of Chromium.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 4 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-286A

P.O. #:

Project name: OWENS CORNING

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0B6347

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2246541 LLE Matrix Spike

(GY1167) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/08/25 92 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/08/25 96 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/08/25 ND, RDL=0.1 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/08/25 0.2 % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 5 of 5
APPENDIX F 

Initial Test Program Hg 

Test Results and 

Documentation 
M30B Mercury Testing

Company Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source IDOwens Corning Waxahachie Texas V-1 DEP Stack EPN-3 Please note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"

Measured Value 

(mg/dscm)

Corrected 

Concentration 

(mg/dscm at 7% O2)

Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used (EPA Method 30B) Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) 

1 10/21/2010 14:45 10/21/2010 16:45 6.91E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 2 10/22/2010 8:20 10/22/2010 10:20 6.59E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 3 10/22/2010 10:30 10/22/2010 13:30 7.22E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date Test End Time

Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Te

Page 1 of 3 
M30B Mercury Testing

 QA/QC Documentation

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/ton)

Trap ID Section 1 Mass (ng) Section 2 Mass (ng) Total Mass (ng) Initial Spike (ng) Total Non- Spike (ng) Sample Volume (dscm) Volume Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit 

8.94 0.9 20.2 16,218.11 9,343.61 359 R1, B 77 0 77 0 77 0.11 2% 

9.65 1.1 20.3 15,838.93 8,824.95 379 R2, B 77 0 77 0 77 0.12 0% 

9.56 1.0 20.3 15,505.00 8,724.51 372 R3, B 83 0.1 83.1 0 83.1 0.12 0% 

Flue Gas 

Temperature (F) Other Supporting Information

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(dscfm)

Flue Gas Flow 

Rate (acfm)

Trap #1

≤20% of field 

recovery test

Page 2 of 3 
M30B Mercury Testing

Section 1 

Mass

Section 2 

Mass

Total 

Mass

Initial 

Spike

Total NonSpike Sample Volume Volume Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration (μg/dscm) Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit Crec R (%) by Run Ravg (%) 

27.0 0.00 27.00 20 7 0.11 2% 0

0.1

0.6 84 -0.4525 -256

27.0 0.10 27.10 20 7.1 0.12 0% 0

0.1

0.6 83 -0.4266 -249

29.0 0.30 29.30 20 9.3 0.12 0% 1

0.1

0.6 80 -0.4677 -270

-258

Trap #2 Paired Trap Agreement (RD) Measured Spike Recovery ( R )

≤20% of field 

recovery test

≤ 10% of Section 

1 Hg mass for 

Hg conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or ≤ 

20% of Section 1 

for Hg conc.≤1 

μg/dscm

≥10 % RD mass 

for Hg conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or 

≤20% RD or ≤0.2 

μg/dscm abs.diff. 

for Hg conc. ≤1 

μg/dscm

Page 3 of 3 
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A Probe # Pollutant Hg Points/Port 6Company OWENS DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 12Location WAXHACHIE, TX Rate (L/m) 1 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 5.0Source V-1 DEP STACK Delta ∆H@ Date 17-Aug-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator GILLEN Bws (%) # of Ports 2 Total Run 120.0Filter Number Condensate Volume Cp Ps (in Hg) 29.30Barometric 29.32 Silica Gel Weight Gain DGM Y Pm (in Hg) 29.32 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.3 Actual Dn (in) O2 (%) 20.3 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 7.06900 CO2 (%) 1.0 Md 28.97 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.97 Act. Flow (cfm) 0.00

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 120.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 0.00

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 0.00

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp (oF)

A B A B A B A B A B 

8:20:00 AM 5.0 378.0 271 271 1 1 8.5 8.5 0.00 0 74 73 

5.0 378.0 274 274 1 1 8.5 8.5 5.52 5.54 74 74 5.0 377.0 273 273 1 1 8.5 8.5 11.05 11.1 74 74 5.0 378.0 275 275 1 1 8.5 8.5 15.88 15.62 75 77 5.0 378.0 276 276 1 1 8.5 8.5 20.02 20.26 77 78 5.0 378.0 281 281 1 1 8.5 8.5 24.94 24.92 78 80 5.0 378.0 280 280 1 1 8.5 8.5 30.04 30.1 77 81 5.0 379.0 277 277 1 1 9 9.5 35.42 35.31 78 82 5.0 379.0 279 279 1 1 8 8.5 40.21 40.36 79 83 5.0 379.0 277 277 1 1 9 8.5 45.02 45.17 80 84 5.0 379.0 274 274 1 1 9.5 9 50.25 50.19 80 84 5.0 380.0 276 276 1 1 9 8.5 55.05 55.15 81 84 5.0 381.0 275 275 1 1 9.5 9 60.13 60.05 81 85 5.0 381.0 274 274 1 1 10 10 65.13 65.13 81 86 5.0 382.0 275 275 1 1 10 10 70.08 70.19 82 86 5.0 382.0 274 274 1 1 9.5 10 75.21 75.18 82 87 5.0 383.0 274 274 1 1 11 10.5 79.97 80.02 82 87 5.0 383.0 274 274 1 1 12 11 85.19 85.07 82 86 5.0 383.0 274 274 1 1 11 11 90.09 90.05 82 87 5.0 383.0 274 274 1 1 11 11 94.97 95.03 82 87 5.0 383.0 274 274 1 1 12 11.5 100.11 100.09 82 86 5.0 383.0 274 274 1 1 12 11.5 105.06 105.09 82 86 5.0 383.0 274 274 1 1 12 10 110.09 110.12 82 86 5.0 383.0 275 275 1 1 12 11 115.12 115.08 81 86 

10:20:00 AM 5.0 120.078 120.61 

Average 5.0 380.5 275.2 275.2 79.5 82.875

Volume 120.078 120.610 

dscm 0.12 0.11 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Pre Test Post Test 

0.000 @ 20.0 in Hg 0.000 @ 21.0 in Hg0.000 @ 21.0 in Hg

0.000 0.000 

DGM Y = 1.024

Trap/ Probe Temp

DG
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A Probe # Pollutant Hg Points/Port 6Company OWENS DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 12Location WAXAHACHIE, TXRate (L/m) 1 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source V-1 DEP STACK Delta ∆H@ Date 17-Aug-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator GILLEN Bws (%) # of Ports 2 Total Run 120.0Filter Number Condensate Volume Cp Ps (in Hg) 29.33Barometric 29.35 Silica Gel Weight Gain DGM Y Pm (in Hg) 29.35 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.3 Actual Dn (in) O2 (%) 20.3 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 7.06900 CO2 (%) 1.0 Md 28.97 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.97 Act. Flow (cfm) 0.00

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 120.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 0.00

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 0.00

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

2:10:00 PM 5.0 369.0 235 235 1 1 7 7 0.00 0 86 88 

5.0 378.0 235 235 1 1 6.5 6.5 5.02 5.1 86 90 5.0 379.0 234 234 1 1 7 7 10.01 9.98 86 90 5.0 381.0 234 234 1 1 10 10 15.12 15.08 87 91 5.0 383.0 235 235 1 1 9.5 9 20.08 20.11 87 91 5.0 384.0 235 235 1 1 12 12 26.05 25.11 88 93 5.0 385.0 235 235 1 1 10 11.5 30.08 30.14 89 93 5.0 384.0 235 235 1 1 12 12 35.12 35 89 93 5.0 385.0 235 235 1 1 11.5 12.5 40.07 40.01 89 94 5.0 385.0 235 235 1 1 12 11.5 44.98 44.97 89 94 5.0 385.0 236 236 1 1 10.5 13 50.07 50.1 89 94 5.0 385.0 235 235 1 1 12 11 54.95 54.98 89 94 5.0 384.0 235 235 1 1 12 11 60.13 60.067 89 94 5.0 385.0 235 235 1 1 11.5 12 65.08 65.08 89 94 5.0 384.0 235 235 1 1 9 10 70.12 70.09 88 91 5.0 385.0 235 235 1 1 12.5 12.5 75.10 75.07 88 92 5.0 385.0 227 227 1 1 9 10 80.08 81.16 89 92 5.0 386.0 235 235 1 1 11 12.5 85.01 85.12 89 94 5.0 386.0 234 234 1 1 11 14 90.14 90.04 90 94 5.0 386.0 235 235 1 1 11.5 13 95.02 95.18 90 94 5.0 386.0 235 235 1 1 11 12 100.00 100.16 90 94 5.0 387.0 235 235 1 1 11 12.5 105.13 105.2 90 95 5.0 387.0 234 234 1 1 11 11 110.02 110.08 90 95 5.0 388.0 234 234 1 1 10.5 11 115.06 115.02 90 95 

4:25:00 PM 120.121 120.078 

Average 0.0 383.8 234.5 234.5 88.58333333 92.88

Volume 120.121 120.078 

dscm 0.11 0.11 

Trap/ Probe Temp

DGM Y = 1.024 DG

0.000 @ 15.0 in Hg 0.000 @ 22.0 in Hg 0.000 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Pre Test Post Test 
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A Probe # Pollutant Hg Points/Port 6Company OWENS DGM # Method 30B Total Points 12Location WAXAHACHIE, TXRate (L/m) 1 Run # 5 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source V-1 DEP STACK Delta ∆H@ Date 18-Aug-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator GILLEN Bws (%) # of Ports 2 Total Run 120.0Filter Number Condensate Volume Cp Ps (in Hg) 29.28Barometric 29.30 Silica Gel Weight Gain DGM Y Pm (in Hg) 29.30 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.3 Actual Dn (in) O2 (%) 18.8 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 7.06900 CO2 (%) 1.0 Md 28.91 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.91 Act. Flow (cfm) 0.00

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 120.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 0.00

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 0.00

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

7:05:00 AM 381.0 277 277 1 1 9 7.5 0.00 0 69 70 

381.0 278 278 1 1 9 7.35 5.12 5.07 69 70 381.0 277 277 1 1 7 6.5 10.05 10 69 70 381.0 276 276 1 1 7 6 15.14 15.06 70 72 381.0 276 276 1 1 5 5 20.11 20.05 72 74 382.0 274 274 1 1 7 6 25.02 25.1 74 77 382.0 270 270 1 1 7 6 30.06 30.12 75 78 382.0 272 272 1 1 7 5.5 35.11 35.01 75 78 382.0 273 273 1 1 7.5 5.5 40.26 40.23 76 79 383.0 275 275 1 1 6.5 5.5 45.11 45.09 77 81 383.0 275 275 1 1 5 5 50.38 50.03 77 81 383.0 275 275 1 1 6 6 55.10 55.09 77 82 383.0 273 273 1 1 6 6 60.24 60.14 77 82 383.0 274 274 1 1 6 5.5 65.09 65.13 78 83 383.0 273 273 1 1 6 5 70.12 70.09 78 83 383.0 273 273 1 1 5.5 5 75.02 75.16 78 83 383.0 274 274 1 1 7.5 6.5 80.11 80.23 79 84 382.0 275 275 1 1 7.5 6.5 85.01 85.13 79 84 382.0 275 275 1 1 7 6 90.31 90.22 79 84 382.0 274 274 1 1 6.5 6 95.11 95.21 79 84 382.0 275 275 1 1 6 6 100.14 100.01 80 85 382.0 276 276 1 1 6.5 6 105.04 105.17 80 85 381.0 276 276 1 1 7 5.5 110.07 110.11 80 85 381.0 276 276 1 1 5 5 115.01 115.22 80 85 

9:05:00 AM 120.056 120.11 

Average 0.0 382.0 274.7 274.7 76.125 79.96

Volume 120.056 120.110 

dscm 0.12 0.12 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Pre Test Post Test 

0.000 @ 20.0 in Hg 0.000 @ 20 in Hg 0.00

Trap/ Probe Temp










Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.

9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3

Twinsburg, OH 44087

Phone: (330) 405-0837

Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other

Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

Report Number BTEnvironmental083110 Report

Client Name BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Date

Contact Name Phone (248)-548-8072 (972)-931-7127

Trap I.D. Date Analyzed Scientist

 Mass ng 

Sect.1

 Mass ng 

Sect.2

Mass ng 

Sect.3

Spike 

Level 

% Spike 

Recovery

Date(s) in 

Stack Comments

70609 8/30/2010 Andrew Mertz 164 0.25 10 8/18/2010 Run 5, Trap A

70660 8/30/2010 Andrew Mertz 152 0.11 8/18/2010 Run 5, Trap B

*70621 8/30/2010 Andrew Mertz 3.37 21.8 10 8/17/2010 Run 3, Trap A

*67502 8/30/2010 Andrew Mertz 1.49 4.85 8/17/2010 Run 3, Trap B

70608 8/31/2010 Andrew Mertz 295 ** 10 8/17/2010 Run 4, Trap A

67483 8/31/2010 Andrew Mertz 279 ** 8/17/2010 Run 4, Trap B

*70604 8/31/2010 Andrew Mertz 7.67 67.0 10 8/17/2010 Run 1, Trap A

*70626 8/31/2010 Andrew Mertz 5.77 9.44 8/17/2010 Run 1, Trap B

70576 8/31/2010 Andrew Mertz 9.62 0.18 10 8/19/2010 RB, Trap A

70648 8/31/2010 Andrew Mertz 0.12 0.10 8/19/2010 RB, Trap B

70613 8/31/2010 Andrew Mertz 9.68 0.12 10 8/19/2010 TB, Trap A

70647 8/31/2010 Andrew Mertz 0.13 0.19 8/19/2010 TB, Trap B

* Traps contained very loose plugs and displayed channeling.

** Section 2 carbon bed was missing from trap.

Variability +- 10%

Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Mike 

Hutcherson mhutcherson@metcoenv.com

Calibration Report Available

Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush

8/31/2010

Less than .031 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less than 

the lowest detection limit.