alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### 1 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NATIONAL CENTER FOR ENIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
- RTP DIVISION Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

May 12 , 2014 MEMORANDUM
To: Integrated Science Assessment (ISA) for Lead Docket (EPA

- HQ

- ORD

- 2011

- 0051) Subject : Errors on pages 3

- 37 and 6

- 307 of the 2013 ISA for Lead
From: Ellen F. Kirrane , Ph.D. /S/ EPA, NCEA

- RTP The sentence starting at the bottom of p. 3

- 36 and continuing on p. 3

- 37 of the 2013 ISA for Lead (Pb) was corrected to read, “Chamberlain et al. (1975) estimated that continuous inhalation of Pb in engine exhaust from fuel containing tetraethyllead at a concentration of 1 μg/m3 for a period of months could produce a 1 μg/dL increment in blood Pb”. On the bottom of p. 6

- 307 (the Chen et al. 2006b row), the last sentence in column 5, was corrected to read, “Time to metamorphosis was delayed in 100 μg Pb/L treatment.” An errata has been included in the 2013 ISA for Lead

.
§ 516.20 Employees under certain collective bargaining agreements who are partially exempt from overtime pay requirements as provided in section 7(b)(1) or section 7(b)(2) of the Act. ( a ) The employer shall maintain and preserve all the information and data required by § 516.2 and shall record daily as well as weekly overtime compensation for each employee employed: ( 1 ) Pursuant to an agreement, made as a result of collective bargaining by representatives of employees certified as bona fide by the National Labor Relations Board, which provides that no employees shall be employed more than 1,040 hours during any period of 26 consecutive weeks as provided in section 7(b)(1) of the Act, or
( 2 ) Pursuant to an agreement, made as a result of collective bargaining by representatives of employees certified as bona fide by the National Labor Relations Board, which provides that the employee shall be employed not more than 2,240 hours during a specified period of 52 consecutive weeks and shall be guaranteed employment as provided in section 7(b)(2) of the Act.
( b ) The employer shall also keep copies of such collective bargaining agreement and such National Labor Relations Board certification as part of the records and shall keep a copy of each amendment or addition thereto.
( c ) The employer shall also make and preserve a record, either separately or as a part of the payroll: ( 1 ) Listing each employee employed pursuant to each such collective bargaining agreement and each amendment and addition thereto.
( 2 ) Indicating the period or periods during which the employee has been or is employed pursuant to an agreement under section 7(b)(1) or 7(b)(2) of the Act, and
( 3 ) Showing the total hours worked during any period of 26 consecutive weeks, if the employee is employed in accordance with section 7(b)(1) of the Act, or during the specified period of 52 consecutive weeks, if employed in accordance with section 7(b)(2) of the Act.
```

[115th Congress Public Law 228]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 1628]]

Public Law 115-228
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
    To make technical amendments to certain marine fish conservation 
statutes, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Aug. 2, 2018 -  [H.R. 4528]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. BILLFISH CONSERVATION ACT OF 2012.

    Section 4(c)(1) of the Billfish Conservation Act of 2012 (16 U.S.C. 
1827a(c)(1)) is amended by inserting ``and retained'' after ``landed''.
SEC. 2. SHARK CONSERVATION ACT OF 2010.

    The Act entitled ``An Act to amend the High Seas Driftnet Fishing 
Moratorium Protection Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation 
and Management Act to improve the conservation of sharks'', approved 
January 4, 2011 (Public Law 111-348; 124 Stat. 3668), is amended--
            (1) by striking section 104 and inserting the following:
``SEC. 104. <<NOTE: 16 USC 1826i note.>>  RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    ``Nothing in this title or the amendments made by this title shall 
be construed as affecting, altering, or diminishing in any way the 
authority of the Secretary of Commerce to establish such conservation 
and management measures as the Secretary considers necessary and 
appropriate under sections 302(a)(3) and 304(g) of the Magnuson-Stevens 
Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1852(a)(3), 
1854(g)).''; and
            (2) in section 1, by striking the item relating to section 
        104 and inserting the following:

``Sec. 104. Rule of construction.''.

    Approved August 2, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4528:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115-775 (Comm. on Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            June 25, considered and passed House.
            July 26, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION  I, Ted R. Sharp, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report. 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report. 4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for  the Registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.   Date:  June 29, 2006  By:   /s/  Ted R. Sharp Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 452.62 Disqualification of candidates; procedural reasons.

A candidate who is otherwise eligible for office may not be disqualified because of the failure of a union officer to perform his duties which are beyond the candidate's control. For example, the failure of a local recording secretary to perform his duty to complete and forward a candidate's nomination certificate to the district may not be used as the basis for disqualifying the candidate.
#### § 2700.37 Answer.

Within 30 days after service of a complaint for compensation, the operator shall file an answer responding to each allegation of the complaint.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 44 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 44

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule set forth as requirements contained in 
the August 17, 2007, letter to State Health Officials from the Director 
  of the Center for Medicaid and State Operations in the Centers for 
 Medicare & Medicaid Services and the State Health Official Letter 08-
               003, dated May 7, 2008, from such Center.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2008

Mr. Rockefeller (for himself, Mr. Baucus, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Domenici, Mr. 
  Lautenberg, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Kennedy, Mrs. Dole, Mr. Schumer, Ms. 
 Mikulski, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Smith, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Whitehouse, Mrs. 
 McCaskill, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Brown, Mr. Cardin, Mrs. Murray, 
Mr. Akaka, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Casey, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Dodd, Ms. Landrieu, 
Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Reed, Mrs. Lincoln, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Obama, Mr. Kohl, 
 Mr. Leahy, Mr. Wyden, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Biden, Mr. Levin, Ms. Stabenow, 
   Mr. Salazar, Mr. Sununu, Mr. Byrd, Ms. Klobuchar, and Mr. Tester) 
  introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule set forth as requirements contained in 
the August 17, 2007, letter to State Health Officials from the Director 
  of the Center for Medicaid and State Operations in the Centers for 
 Medicare & Medicaid Services and the State Health Official Letter 08-
               003, dated May 7, 2008, from such Center.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Secretary of Health and Human Services relating 
to requirements set forth in the State Health Official Letter 07-001, 
dated August 17, 2007, issued by the Director of the Center for 
Medicaid and State Operations in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 
Services and the State Health Official Letter 08-003, dated May 7, 
2008, from such Center, requiring States that expand the income 
eligibility level for children under the State Children's Health 
Insurance Program (SCHIP) above 250 percent of the Federal poverty 
level to adopt the 5 crowd-out strategies described in the August 17, 
2007, letter with the components identified therein, and to provide 
certain assurances described in such letter, and such rule shall have 
no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of LCNB Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Stephen P. Wilson, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve P. Foster, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|/s/ Stephen P. Wilson                     |  | /s/ Steve P. Foster                    
|----------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Stephen P. Wilson
Chief Executive Officer |  | Steve P. Foster
Chief Financial Officer





Date:  October 30, 2006
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crdentia Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, James D. Durham, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to my knowledge:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date:  November 15, 2004            By: /s/ James D. Durham
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                            James D. Durham
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
[Civ. No. 13378.

First Dist., Div. Two.

Oct. 9, 1947.]

#### PALO ALTO BUILDING CO. INC. (a Corporation), Respondent, v. GWENDOLYN C. JONES et al., Appellants.

Joseph A. Brown for Appellants.

Frank J. Fontes for Respondent.

NOURSE, P. J.

This appeal presents no legal difficulties and no justification for the time and expense imposed upon the respondent.

The complaint prayed for a vendor’» lien on real property to secure the payment of the unpaid balance of the purchase price. It alleged that Mr. and Mrs. Jones took over and exercised an option to sell the property which had been put in the name of another as mere title holder; that, through an *726error of the title company, a deed was given to the Jones without calling for the assumption of an outstanding P.H.A. loan; that the Jones had full knowledge of the mistake. The answer admitted that husband and wife were the owners in fee through this deed.

The trial court found that all these allegations were true and rendered judgment against the Jones and impressed a lien on the property to secure payment of the amount of the P.H.A. loan.

The evidence fully supports the findings. There is no conflict in the evidence except as to some of the testimony which the trial court rejected as incredible. Jones acted throughout for himself and his wife; he had full knowledge of the outstanding loan, full knowledge that the title company had made a mistake, and, for that reason, took title in the name of his wife as sole grantee.

The first ground raised by appellants is that an agreement to create a lien must be in writing. The universally accepted rule in the case of vendor’s liens is *contra.*Section 3046 of the Civil Code; 17 Cal.Jur. 718; 25 Cal.Jur. 740; *Estate of Reid,*26 Cal.App.2d 362, 370 [79 P.2d 451].

The second and third points argued are but a restatement of the first. They rest on the unsound basis that the vendor’s lien is a mortgage and must be in writing.

The fourth point is that Mrs. Jones must be held to have been an innocent purchaser. Their answer admitted that Mr. and Mrs. Jones were the owners in fee under the deed. Mr. J ones knew all the circumstances of the outstanding loan and knew that the title company had made a mistake in failing to protect the loan when the transfer was made. There is no reliable evidence that the wife was an innocent purchaser. As agent for his wife, the knowledge of Mr. Jones will be imputed to her. Section 2332 of the Civil Code reads: “As against a principal, both principal and agent are deemed to have notice of whatever either has notice of, and ought, in good faith and the exercise of ordinary care and diligence, to communicate to the other.” Since Mr. Jones had knowledge of the loan and the mistake in the transfer he will be deemed to have communicated “in good faith” those facts to his wife.

Judgment affirmed.

Goodell, J., and Pooling, J., concurred.
TS-AMID10/20/40

Attachment #6

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 3 

Environmental Release and Disposal Information on the New Chemical Substances 

at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter – Manufacture and Processing
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 152 (Monday, August 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 48147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20034]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive Patent License Agreement; 
OxiCool, Inc.

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy gives notice of its intent to grant 
to OxiCool, Inc., of 4747 South Broad Street, The Navy Yard, Building 
101, Suite LL40, Philadelphia, PA 19112-103, a revocable, 
nonassignable, exclusive license, in all fields of use on commercial 
and residential air conditioning systems, to practice in the United 
States, the Government-Owned invention, as identified in U.S. Patent 
Number 7,836,732 b2: Air Conditioning System, issued on November 23, 
2010.

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to granting of this license must file 
written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later 
than August 23, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with the Naval Air 
Warfare Center Aircraft Division, Office of Research and Technology 
Applications, Attn: Mr. Paul Fritz, Building 505, Room 117, 22473 
Millstone Road, Patuxent River, MD 20670.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Mr. Paul Fritz, Naval Air Warfare 
Center, Office of Research and Technology Applications, Building 505, 
Room 117, 22473 Millstone Road, Patuxent River, MD 20670.

    Authority:  35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

    Dated: August 2, 2011.
L.M. Senay,
Lieutenant, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register 
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-20034 Filed 8-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

#### § 4.160 Effect of section 6(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Contractors and subcontractors performing work on contracts subject to the Service Contract Act are required to pay all employees, including those employees who are not performing work on or in connection with such contracts, not less than the general minimum wage standard provided in section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended (Pub. L. 95-151).
§ 37.98 When will the Director conclude that compliance cannot be secured by voluntary means? The Director will conclude that compliance cannot be secured by voluntary means under the following circumstances: ( a ) The grant applicant or recipient fails or refuses to correct the violation(s) within the time period established by the Letter of Findings, Notice to Show Cause or Initial Determination; or
( b ) The Director has not approved an extension of time for agreement on voluntary compliance, under § 37.95(b)(1)(ii), and he or she either: ( 1 ) Has not been notified, under § 37.95(b)(3), that the grant applicant or recipient has agreed to voluntary compliance;
( 2 ) Has disapproved a written assurance or Conciliation Agreement, under § 37.95(b)(4); or
( 3 ) Has received notice from the Governor, under § 37.95(b)(2), that the grant applicant or recipient will not comply voluntarily.
-25-

EXHIBIT 12

<TABLE>
STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIOS 
TRINOVA CORPORATION
(In thousands, except per share data)

<CAPTION>
                                
                                              Year Ended December 31
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      1996     1995     1994     1993     1992
                                      ----     ----     ----     ----     ----
<S>                                <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED
  CHARGES                        

Income before income taxes and 
  cumulative effect of accounting
  change                            $153,421 $128,196 $101,255 $ 17,111 $ 24,042 
Dividends received, net of equity
  in earnings (loss) of 
  unconsolidated affiliates            9,961   (3,704)   1,213        1   (1,931)  
Fixed charges                         41,712   31,762   30,249   33,370   34,623  
                                    -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income before cumulative effect 
  of accounting change for
  computation purposes              $205,094 $156,254 $132,717 $ 50,482 $ 56,734 
                                    ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== 

FIXED CHARGES

Interest expense, including interest
  related to corporate owned life
  insurance                         $ 34,963 $ 24,477 $ 22,582 $ 25,516 $ 26,313 
Portion of rent expense representing
  interest                             6,288    6,903    7,303    7,490    7,987   
Amortization of debt expense and
  debt discount                          461      382      364      364      323
                                    -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total fixed charges                 $ 41,712 $ 31,762 $ 30,249 $ 33,370 $ 34,623
                                    ======== ======== ======== ======== ========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed 
  Charges                               4.9x     4.9x     4.4x     1.5x     1.6x  
                                    ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
<FN>

For the purpose of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
"earnings" consist of income before income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting change, plus fixed charges and dividends received, net of equity in
earnings (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates.  Fixed charges consists of
interest expense, the portion of rent expense representing interest and
amortization of debt discount.

</FN>
</TABLE>