41926 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 137 / Monday, July 19, 2010 / Notices 

DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SAFELY TRANSPORTING CHILDREN IN SPECIFIC SITUATIONS IN EMERGENCY GROUND

AMBULANCES—Continued 

For mother and newborn, transport the newborn in an approved size-appropriate child restraint system that 

complies with the injury criteria of FMVSS 213 in the rear facing EMS provider seat with a forward-facing 

belt path that prevents both lateral and forward movement (convertible or integrated child restraint system and not an infant only seat), leaving the cot 21 for the mother. 

If the Ideal is not Practical or 

Achievable.

When available resources prevent meeting the criteria shown for situations 1 through 4 for all child patients, including mother and newborn, transport using space available in a non-emergency mode, exercising extreme caution and driving at reduced (i.e., below legal maximum) speeds. 

If additional units may be needed based upon preliminary reports, backup units should be put on standby. 

Prepared under NHTSA Contract DTNH22–08–C00085, EMS Solutions for Safely Transporting Children in Emergency Vehicles, with 

Maryn Consulting, Inc. 

6Please consult Appendix C, General Considerations and Selecting Child Restraint Systems for Ground Ambulance Transport, for guidance on 

how to select equipment that may be used to meet the requirements of each of the recommendations. EMS providers are encouraged to check 

with equipment manufacturers for detailed information on the proper use and installation, results of crash testing, and possible limitations of any 

equipment that may be considered for use to fulfill the recommendations for the safe transportation of children in emergency ground ambulances. 7There may be considerations of adding specific conditions for this use, e.g., crash tested seat meeting FMVSS 213 and adequate space in 

front of the seat. 8The Working Group recommends that all EMS agencies plan, in advance, with other public health, public safety, and other partners for those 

situations where uninjured or not ill infants and children may be on the scene—as primary patients or not—so such events can be successfully 

mitigated and the uninjured infants and children can be transported as safely and as quickly as possible. 9See Footnote 1. 10 11All children transported on a cot shall be restrained to the cot with the 5-point cot restraint system that includes three horizontal restraints 

across the torso (chest, waist, and knees) and one vertical restraint across each shoulder. 12See Footnote 1. 13See Footnotes 5 and 6. 14 Ibid. 15See Footnote 1. 16See Footnotes 5 and 6. 17 Ibid. 18 Ibid. 19 Ibid. 20The Working Group recommends that all EMS systems ‘‘pre-plan’’, i.e., plan in advance for those situations where multiple infants and children may be on the scene—as primary patients or not—so such events can be successfully mitigated. Pre-planning for such events must also involve other public health, public safety and other partners to be most successful. An example of such an event is one that involves multiple patients, i.e., infants and/or children who need to be transported (to include labor with the mother and one or more newborns). 21All children transported on a cot shall be restrained to the cot with the 5-point cot restraint system that includes three horizontal restraints 

across the torso (chest, waist, and knees) and one vertical restraint across each shoulder. 

[FR Doc. 2010–17513 Filed 7–16–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Noise Exposure Map Notice New 

Smyrna Beach Municipal Airport, New 

Smyrna Beach, FL 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration, DOT. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) announces its 

determination that the Noise Exposure 

Maps submitted by the City of New 

Smyrna Beach for New Smyrna Beach 

Municipal Airport under the provisions 

of 49 U.S.C. 47501 et seq. (Aviation 

Safety and Noise Abatement Act) and 14 

CFR Part 150 are in compliance with 

applicable requirements. 

DATES: Effective Date: The effective date 

of the FAA’s determination on the noise 

exposure maps is July 8, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Lindy McDowell, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Orlando Airports 

District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National 

Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32822, 

407–812–6331. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

notice announces that the FAA finds 

that the Noise Exposure Maps submitted 

for New Smyrna Beach Municipal 

Airport are in compliance with 

applicable requirements of Title 14 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 

150, effective July 8, 2010. Under 49 

U.S.C. section 47503 of the Aviation 

Safety and Noise Abatement Act (the 

Act), an airport operator may submit to 

the FAA Noise Exposure Maps which 

meet applicable regulations and which 

depict non-compatible land uses as of 

the date of submission of such maps, a 

description of projected aircraft 

operations, and the ways in which such 

operations will affect such maps. The 

Act requires such maps to be developed 

in consultation with interested and 

affected parties in the local community, 

government agencies, and persons using 

the airport. An airport operator who has 

submitted Noise Exposure Maps that are 

found by FAA to be in compliance with 

the requirements of 14 CFR Part 150, 

promulgated pursuant to the Act, may 

submit a Noise Compatibility Program 

for FAA approval which sets forth the 

measures the airport operator has taken 

or proposes to take to reduce existing 

non-compatible uses and prevent the 

introduction of additional noncompatible uses. 

The FAA has completed its review of 

the Noise Exposure Maps and 

accompanying documentation 

submitted by the City of New Smyrna 

Beach. The documentation that 

constitutes the ‘‘Noise Exposure Maps’’ 

as defined in Section 150.7 of 14 CFR 

Part 150 includes: Figure 6.1, 2009 

Noise Contours; Figure 6.2, 2014 Noise 

Contours; Figure 5–1, Runway 02 Flight 

Tracks; Figure 5–2, Runway 07 Flight 

Tracks; Figure 5–3, Runway 11 Flight 

Tracks; Figure 5–4, Runway 20 Flight 

Tracks; Figure 5–5, Runway 25 Flight 

Tracks; Figure 5–6, Runway 29 Flight 

Tracks; Figure 5.7, Helicopter Flight 

Tracks, Figure 5.8 Local Flight Tracks; 

Table 5.1, 2008 Annual Operations; 

Table 5.2, 2008 Annual-Average Day 

Fleet Mix (Itinerant Operations); Table 

5.3, 2008 Annual Average Day Fleet Mix 

(Local Operations); Table 5.4 2013 

Annual Operations; Table 5.5, 2013 

Annual-Average Day Fleet Mix 

(Itinerant Operations); Table 5.6, 2013 

Annual Average Day Fleet Mix (Local 

Operations); Figure 5.10, Percentage 

Runway Utilization; and Table 5.11, 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 137 / Monday, July 19, 2010 / Notices 41927 

Percentage Helicopter Runway/Helipad 

Utilization. The FAA has determined 

that these Noise Exposure Maps and 

accompanying documentation are in 

compliance with applicable 

requirements. This determination is 

effective on July 8, 2010. 

FAA’s determination on the airport 

operator’s Noise Exposure Maps is 

limited to a finding that the maps were 

developed in accordance with the 

procedures contained in Appendix A of 

14 CFR Part 150. Such determination 

does not constitute approval of the 

airport operator’s data, information or 

plans, or a commitment to approve a 

Noise Compatibility Program or to fund 

the implementation of that Program. If 

questions arise concerning the precise 

relationship of specific properties to 

noise exposure contours depicted on a 

Noise Exposure Map submitted under 

Section 47503 of the Act, it should be 

noted that the FAA is not involved in 

any way in determining the relative 

locations of specific properties with 

regard to the depicted noise exposure 

contours, or in interpreting the Noise 

Exposure Maps to resolve questions 

concerning, for example, which 

properties should be covered by the 

provisions of Section 47506 of the Act. 

These functions are inseparable from 

the ultimate land use control and 

planning responsibilities of local 

government. These local responsibilities 

are not changed in any way under 14 

CFR Part 150 or through FAA’s review 

of Noise Exposure Maps. Therefore, the 

responsibility for the detailed 

overlaying of noise exposure contours 

onto the map depicting properties on 

the surface rests exclusively with the 

airport operator that submitted those 

maps, or with those public agencies and 

planning agencies with which 

consultation is required under Section 

47503 of the Act. The FAA has relied on 

the certification by the airport operator, 

under Section 150.21 of 14 CFR Part 

150, that the statutorily required 

consultation has been accomplished. 

Copies of the full Noise Exposure 

Maps documentation and of the FAA’s 

evaluation of the maps are available for 

examination at the following location: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 

Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 

Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 400, 

Orlando, FL 32822, 407–812–6331. 

Questions may be directed to the 

individual named above under the 

heading, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

Issued in Orlando, Florida, on July 8, 2010. 

W. Dean Stringer, 

Manager, Orlando Airports District Office. 

[FR Doc. 2010–17512 Filed 7–16–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

TREASURY DEPARTMENT 

Senior Executive Service; Special 

Inspector General for the Troubled 

Asset Relief Program; Performance 

Review Board 

AGENCY: Treasury Department. 

ACTION: Notice of members of the 

SIGTARP Performance Review Board. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

4314(c)(4), this notice announces the 

appointment of members of the Special 

Inspector General for the Troubled Asset 

Relief Program Performance Review 

Board (PRB). The purpose of this Board 

is to review and make recommendations 

concerning proposed performance 

appraisals, ratings, bonuses and other 

appropriate personnel actions for 

incumbents of SES positions in 

SIGTARP. The board will perform PRB 

functions for other bureau positions if 

requested. 

Compostion of SIGTARP PRB: The 

Board shall consist of at least three 

members. In the case of an appraisal of 

a career appointee, more than half the 

members shall consist of career 

appointees. The names and titles of the 

Board members are as follows: 

Kevin Puvalowski, Regional Director. 

Christy Romero, Chief of Staff. 

Timothy Lee, Senior Policy Analyst. 

Dr. Eileen Ennis, Deputy Special 

Inspector General, Operations. 

Kurt Hyde, Deputy Special Inspector 

General, Audit. 

Christopher Sharply, Deputy Special 

Inspector General, Investigations. 

Brian Saddler, Chief Counsel to the 

Special Inspector General. 

DATES: Effective Date: Membership is 

effective on the date of this notice. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sally Ruble, Human Resources 

Specialist, 1801 L Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20220. Telephone: 202 

927–9457. 

Dated: June 24, 2010. 

Deborah Mason, 

Director, Human Resources, Operations 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–17584 Filed 7–16–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of Thrift Supervision 

Ideal Federal Savings Bank, Baltimore, 

Maryland; Notice of Appointment of 

Receiver 

Notice is hereby given that, pursuant 

to the authority contained in section 

5(d)(2) of the Home Owners’ Loan Act, 

the Office of Thrift Supervision has duly 

appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance 

Corporation as sole Receiver for Ideal 

Federal Savings Bank, Baltimore, 

Maryland, (OTS No. 08283), on July 9, 

2010. 

Dated: July 12, 2010. 

By the Office of Thrift Supervision. 

Sandra E. Evans, 

Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 2010–17333 Filed 7–16–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6720–01–M 

UNITED STATES SENTENCING 

COMMISSION 

Sentencing Guidelines for United 

States Courts 

AGENCY: United States Sentencing 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed priorities. 

Request for public comment. 

SUMMARY: As part of its statutory 

authority and responsibility to analyze 

sentencing issues, including operation 

of the Federal sentencing guidelines, 

and in accordance with Rule 5.2 of its 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, the 

United States Sentencing Commission is 

seeking comment on possible priority 

policy issues for the amendment cycle 

ending May 1, 2011. 

DATES: Public comment should be 

received on or before August 18, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: United 

States Sentencing Commission, One 

Columbus Circle, NE., Suite 2–500, 

South Lobby, Washington, DC 20002– 

8002, Attention: Public Affairs— 

Priorities Comment. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Courlander, Public Affairs 

Officer, Telephone: (202) 502–4597. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

United States Sentencing Commission is 

an independent agency in the judicial 

branch of the United States 

Government. The Commission 

promulgates sentencing guidelines and 

policy statements for Federal sentencing 

courts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(a). The 

Commission also periodically reviews 

and revises previously promulgated 

guidelines pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(o) 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES