alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 130 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 130

 Designating July 28, 2007, as ``National Day of the American Cowboy''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 28, 2007

   Mr. Thomas (for himself, Mr. Craig, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Salazar, Mr. 
Ensign, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Cornyn, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Baucus, 
 Mr. Allard, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Domenici, Mrs. Murray, Mr. 
  Crapo, Mr. Enzi, and Mr. Hatch) submitted the following resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating July 28, 2007, as ``National Day of the American Cowboy''.

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as cowboys, helped establish the 
        American West;
Whereas that cowboy spirit continues to infuse the Nation with its solid 
        character, sound family values, and good common sense;
Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, compassion, respect, a 
        strong work ethic, and patriotism;
Whereas the cowboy loves, lives off of, and depends on the land and its 
        creatures, and is an excellent steward, protecting and enhancing the 
        environment;
Whereas the cowboy continues to play a significant role in the culture and 
        economy of the United States;
Whereas approximately 800,000 ranchers in all 50 States are conducting business 
        and contributing to the economic well-being of nearly every county in 
        the Nation;
Whereas rodeo is the sixth most-watched sport in the United States;
Whereas membership in rodeo and other organizations encompassing the livelihood 
        of a cowboy transcends race and sex and spans every generation;
Whereas the cowboy is an American icon;
Whereas to recognize the American cowboy is to acknowledge the ongoing 
        commitment of the United States to an esteemed and enduring code of 
        conduct; and
Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys to their communities should be 
        recognized and encouraged: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates July 28, 2007, as ``National Day of the 
        American Cowboy''; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 500.42 Certificate of Registration to be carried and exhibited.

Each registered farm labor contractor and registered farm labor contractor employee shall carry at all times while engaging in farm labor contracting activities, a Certificate of Registration or a Farm Labor Contractor Employee Certificate as appropriate and, upon request, shall exhibit that certificate to representatives of the U.S. Department of Labor and State Employment Service Agencies and to all persons with whom he intends to deal as a farm labor contractor or farm labor contractor employee.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# DATE and TIME:

 Thursday, February 3, 2011, at 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# STATUS:

 This meeting will be open to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Correction and Approval of Minutes for January 20, 2011.

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Georgia Federal Elections Committee.

Kucinich for President, Inc.—Statement of Reasons—Repayment Determination upon Administrative Review.

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Kansas Republican Party.

Management and Administrative Matters.

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Shawn Woodhead Werth, Commission Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

 Judith Ingram, Press Officer Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shawn Woodhead Werth,

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2011-2047 Filed 1-26-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
#### § 530.301 General.

A system of civil money penalties is established to provide a remedy for any violation of the FLSA related to homework (except child labor violations, which are subject to civil money penalties pursuant to part 579 of this chapter), or for any violation of the homeworker regulations or employers' assurances pursuant to this part, which are not so serious as to warrant denial or revocation of a certificate. Accordingly, no civil money penalty will be assessed for conduct which serves as the basis of proposed denial or revocation of a certificate. (See subpart C of this part.) Civil money penalties will be assessed only against employers who are operating under a certificate or who are seeking certification.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bear Lake Recreation, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), we, Wayne Bassham, Principal Executive Officer, and Todd Albiston, Principal Financial Officer, of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and








(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.








Date:
10/29/10

By:
/s/Wayne BasshamWayne BasshamPrincipal Executive OfficerDate:
10/29/10

By:
/s/Todd AlbistonTodd AlbistonPrincipal Financial Officer
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TriadHospitals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James D. Shelton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ James D. Shelton

James D. Shelton 

Chief Executive Officer 

May 14, 2003

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001074545
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING VI, L.P.


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-24-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         85
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                        (100)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUILLERMO MARTINEZ

RODRIGUEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-70286

Agency No. A075-660-347

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Guillermo Martinez Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order granting him voluntary departure. We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of due process

FILED

JUN 02 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-70286

violations in immigration proceedings. Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th

Cir. 2000). We deny the petition for review.

We agree with the BIA’s conclusion that Martinez Rodriguez failed to

demonstrate prejudice from the IJ’s refusal to consider additional evidence of

hardship, and his due process claim therefore fails. See id. (requiring prejudice to

prevail on a due process challenge).

In light of our disposition, we do not consider Martinez Rodriguez’s

remaining contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
§ 2520.103-9 Direct filing for bank or insurance carrier trusts and accounts. ( a ) *General.* Under the authority of sections 103(b)(4), 104(a)(3), 110 and 505 of the Act, an employee benefit plan, some or all of the assets of which are held in a common or collective trust or a pooled separate account described in section 103(b)(3)(G) of the Act and §§ 2520.103-3 and 2520.103-4, is relieved from including in its annual report information about the current value of the plan's allocable portion of assets and liabilities of the common or collective trust or pooled separate account and information concerning the individual transactions of the common or collective trust or pooled separate account, provided that the plan meets the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section, and, provided further, that the bank or insurance carrier which holds the plan's assets meets the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) *Application.* A plan whose assets are held in a common or collective trust or a pooled separate account described in section 103(b)(3)(G) of the Act and §§ 2520.103-3 and 2520.103-4, provided the plan administrator, on or before the end of the plan year, provides the bank or insurance carrier which maintains the common or collective trust or pooled separate account with the plan number, and name and Employer Identification Number of the plan sponsor as will be reported on the plan's annual report.
( c ) *Separate filing by common or collective trusts and pooled separate accounts.* The bank or insurance carrier which maintains the common or collective trust or pooled separate account in which assets of the plan are held shall file, in accordance with the instructions for the form, a completed Form 5500 “Annual Return/Report of Employee Benefit Plan” and any statements or schedules required to be attached to the form for the common or collective trust or pooled separate account, including Schedule D (DFE/Participating Plan Information) and Schedule H (Financial Information). See the instructions for this form. The information reported shall be for the fiscal year of such trust or account ending with or within the plan year for which the annual report of the plan is made.
( d ) *Electronic filing.* See § 2520.104a-2 and the instructions for the Form 5500 “Annual Return/Report of Employee Benefit Plan” for electronic filing requirements. The bank or insurance company which maintains the common or collective trust or pooled separate account must maintain an original copy, with all required signatures, as part of its records.
[65 FR 21082, Apr. 19, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 41368, July 21, 2006]
**EXHIBIT      99.20**

**AMENDMENT      NO. 4 TO**

**LONGVIEW      FIBRE COMPANY**

**BRANCH      PLANT HOURLY EMPLOYEES' 401(K) PLAN**

**10.1**
**Participant      Loans Permitted**

|   | (c) | Legal                Maximum Limit.                The maximum a Participant may borrow, including the aggregate outstanding                balances of existing Plan loans, is 50% of his vested Account balance,                not                to exceed $50,000. However, the $50,000 maximum is reduced by the                Participant's highest aggregate outstanding Plan loan balance during                the                12-month period ending on the day before the date as of which the                loan is                processed. A defaulted loan that has been deemed distributed (including                interest accrued thereon, whether before or after such deemed                distribution), but that has not been repaid or offset against the                Participant's Account, shall be considered outstanding for purposes                of                determining the maximum amount of any subsequent loan to the Participant.                For purposes of this paragraph, the qualified plans of all Related                Companies shall be treated as though they are part of the Plan to                the                extent it would decrease the maximum loan                amount. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**10.6**
**Maximum      Number of Loans**

**10.9**
**Loan      Payment**

**10.11**
**Repayment      Suspension**
#### KAIFER et v OHIO LEATHER CO et

Ohio Apueals, 7th Dist, Mahoning Co

Decided Nov 8, 1929

James Kennedy, J. V. Murphy and Barnum & Hammond, all of Youngstown, for Kaifer, et. .

Harrington, DeFord, Huxley & Smith, Youngstown, for Leather Co, et.

*344BY THE COURT:

It is not now believed that it would be profitable or necessary to enter into a detailed discussion of the facts, which are somewhat involved as disclosed by the amended petition, which consists of many pages. It is sufficient now to say that it was desired to restrain what may be termed the reorganization of this corporation in 1923, which reorganization would substantially change the character of the holdings of the various stockholders, consisting of many shares of preferred stock, to bear a certain rate of interest and a certain amount of no par stock, and this reorganization was brought about, Kaifer and his co-plaintiffs objecting to the same, and complaining that they were not notified of certain meetings that were held, and complaining also that by the reorganization they were deprived of the sum of $17.50 per share, which had accumulated as dividends upon each share of stock. A reorganization was had under favor of Article 13, Section 2, of the Constitution of the State of Ohio, which provides how corporations shall be formed:

> “Corporations, how formed. Corporations may be formed under general laws; but all such laws may, from time to time, be altered and repealed.”

Subsequent legislation consisting of Sections 8728-1 to 8728-11 of the General Code was enacted, and it is under favor of these sections that this reorganization was had or attempted to be had.

It is sufficient in this connection to say that after having carefully considered the issues raised, the conclusion is that the plaintiff and his co-plaintiffs owned their holdings in this corporation subject to the above constitutional provision and therefore subject to the legislation incident thereto, above Sections 8728-1 to 8728-11. Having reached that conclusion, it is again sufficient to say that the conclusion reached by the Referee is correct; that the corporation had a right to reorganize as it did, and that the stockholders objecting hold their interests subject to the constitutional provision, and the consequent right of the legislature to enact the above legislation, authorizing the reorganization of the corporation.

For the reasons given, a judgment will be entered in harmony with the finding in the report of the Referee and an entry may be prepared accordingly. If it is desired when the opinion is revised, the issues may oe discussed at greater length, but it does not now seem necessary in view of the fact that all counsel on both sides are fully advised as to the facts, and the foregoing covers the controlling issue.

Pollock, Roberts and Farr, JJ. concur.
#### § 570.130 Employment of certain youth inside and outside of places of business that use power-driven machinery to process wood products.

Section 13(c)(7) of the FLSA provides a limited exemption from the child labor provisions for certain youths between the ages of 14 and 18 years who, by statute or judicial order, are excused from compulsory school attendance beyond the eighth grade, that permits their employment inside and outside of places of business that use power-driven machinery to process wood products. The provisions of this exemption are contained in subpart C of this part (§ 570.34(m)) and HO 4 (§ 570.54). Although the exemption allows certain youths between the ages of 14 and 18 years to be employed inside and outside of places of business that use power-driven machines to process wood products, it does so only if such youths do not operate or assist in the operation of power-driven woodworking machines. The exemption also requires that the youth be supervised by an adult relative or by an adult member of the same religious sect as the youth. The youth must also be protected from wood particles or other flying debris within the workplace by a barrier appropriate to the potential hazard of such wood particles or flying debris or by maintaining a sufficient distance from machinery in operation. For the exemption to apply, the youth must also be required to use personal protective equipment to prevent exposure to excessive levels of noise and sawdust.

[75 FR 28460, May 20, 2010]
#### § 780.145 The relationship is determined by consideration of all relevant factors.

The character of a practice as a part of the agricultural activity or as a distinct business activity must be determined by examination and evaluation of all the relevant facts and circumstances in the light of the pertinent language and intent of the Act. The result will not depend on any mechanical application of isolated factors or tests. Rather, the total situation will control (*Maneja* v. *Waialua,* 349 U.S. 254; *Mitchell* v. *Budd,* 350 U.S. 473). Due weight should be given to any available criteria which may indicate whether performance of such a practice may properly be considered an incident to farming within the intent of the Act. Thus, the general relationship, if any, of the practice to farming as evidenced by common understanding, competitive factors, and the prevalence of its performance by farmers (see § 780.146), and similar pertinent matters should be considered. Other factors to be considered in determining whether a practice may be properly regarded as incidental to or in conjunction with the farming operations of a particular farmer or farm include the size of the operations and respective sums invested in land, buildings and equipment for the regular farming operations and in plant and equipment for performance of the practice, the amount of the payroll for each type of work, the number of employees and the amount of time they spend in each of the activities, the extent to which the practice is performed by ordinary farm employees and the amount of interchange of employees between the operations, the amount of revenue derived from each activity, the degree of industrialization involved, and the degree of separation established between the activities. With respect to practices performed on farm products (see § 780.147) and in the consideration of any specific practices (see §§ 780.148-780.158 and 780.205-780.214), there may be special factors in addition to those above mentioned which may aid in the determination.