Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2011 / Notices 49797 

(f) The Plan fiduciaries will review 

and approve the methodology used to 

value the Securities and ensure that 

such methodology is properly applied 

in determining the fair market value of 

the Securities. 

Notice to Interested Parties 

Notice of the proposed exemption 

will be given to interested persons 

within 5 days of the publication of the 

notice of proposed exemption in the 

Federal Register. The notice will be 

given to interested persons by first class 

mail or by return receipt requested 

electronic mail. Such notice will 

contain a copy of the notice of proposed 

exemption, as published in the Federal 

Register, and a supplemental statement, 

as required pursuant to 29 CFR 

2570.43(b)(2). The supplemental 

statement will inform interested persons 

of their right to comment on and/or to 

request a hearing with respect to the 

pending exemption. Written comments 

and hearing requests are due within 40 

days of the publication of the notice of 

proposed exemption in the Federal 

Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Anh-Viet Ly of the Department at (202) 

693–8648. (This is not a toll-free 

number.) 

General Information 

The attention of interested persons is 

directed to the following: 

(1) The fact that a transaction is the 

subject of an exemption under section 

408(a) of the Act and/or section 

4975(c)(2) of the Code does not relieve 

a fiduciary or other party in interest or 

disqualified person from certain other 

provisions of the Act and/or the Code, 

including any prohibited transaction 

provisions to which the exemption does 

not apply and the general fiduciary 

responsibility provisions of section 404 

of the Act, which, among other things, 

require a fiduciary to discharge his 

duties respecting the plan solely in the 

interest of the participants and 

beneficiaries of the plan and in a 

prudent fashion in accordance with 

section 404(a)(1)(b) of the Act; nor does 

it affect the requirement of section 

401(a) of the Code that the plan must 

operate for the exclusive benefit of the 

employees of the employer maintaining 

the plan and their beneficiaries; 

(2) Before an exemption may be 

granted under section 408(a) of the Act 

and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code, 

the Department must find that the 

exemption is administratively feasible, 

in the interests of the plan and of its 

participants and beneficiaries, and 

protective of the rights of participants 

and beneficiaries of the plan; 

(3) The proposed exemptions, if 

granted, will be supplemental to, and 

not in derogation of, any other 

provisions of the Act and/or the Code, 

including statutory or administrative 

exemptions and transitional rules. 

Furthermore, the fact that a transaction 

is subject to an administrative or 

statutory exemption is not dispositive of 

whether the transaction is in fact a 

prohibited transaction; and 

(4) The proposed exemptions, if 

granted, will be subject to the express 

condition that the material facts and 

representations contained in each 

application are true and complete, and 

that each application accurately 

describes all material terms of the 

transaction which is the subject of the 

exemption. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of 

August, 2011. 

Ivan Strasfeld, 

Director of Exemption Determinations, 

Employee Benefits Security Administration, 

U.S. Department of Labor. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20341 Filed 8–10–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–29–P 

OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG 

CONTROL POLICY 

Designation of ONDCP SES 

Performance Review Board Members 

AGENCY: Office of National Drug Control 

Policy. 

ACTION: Notice of Designation of ONDCP 

SES Performance Review Board. 

Headings: Designation Pursuant of 

ONDCP SES Performance Review Board 

Pursuant to 5 CFR 4 30.310. 

SUMMARY: The Director of the Office of 

National Drug Control Policy has 

appointed Patrick M. Ward, Robert 

Denniston, Michele Marx, and Jeffrey 

Teitz as members of the ONDCP SES 

Performance Review Board (PRB). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Please direct any questions to Briggitte 

LaFontant, Assistant for Personnel, 

Office of National Drug Control Policy, 

Executive Office of the President, 

Washington, DC 20502; (202) 395–6695. 

Daniel R. Petersen, 

Deputy General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20422 Filed 8–10–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3180–W1–P 

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

Notice of Permit Modification Issued 

Under the Antarctic Conservation Act 

of 1978 

AGENCY: National Science Foundation. 

ACTION: Notice of permit issued under 

the Antarctic Conservation of 1978, 

Public Law 95–541. 

SUMMARY: The National Science 

Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 

notice of permits issued under the 

Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 

This is the required notice. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, 

Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, 

National Science Foundation, 4201 

Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 7, 

2011, the National Science Foundation 

published a notice in the Federal 

Register of a permit application 

received. The permit was issued on 

August 8, 2011 to: James G. Bockheim; 

Permit No. 2012–004. 

Nadene G. Kennedy, 

Permit Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20409 Filed 8–10–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555–01–P 

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

Notice of Permit Modification Received 

Under the Antarctic Conservation Act 

of 1978 (Pub. L. 95–541) 

AGENCY: National Science Foundation. 

ACTION: Notice of Permit Modification 

Request Received under the Antarctic 

Conservation Act of 1978, Public Law 

95–541. 

SUMMARY: The National Science 

Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 

a notice of requests to modify permits 

issued to conduct activities regulated 

under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 

1978. NSF has published regulations 

under the Antarctic Conservation Act at 

Title 45 part 670 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations. This is the required notice 

of a requested permit modification. 

DATES: Interested parties are invited to 

submit written data, comments, or 

views with respect to this permit 

application by September 12, 2011. 

Permit applications may be inspected by 

interested parties at the Permit Office, 

address below. 

ADDRESS: Comments should be 

addressed to Permit Office, Room 755, 

Office of Polar Programs, National 

Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 

Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nadene G. Kennedy at the above 

address or (703) 292–7405. 

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: The 

National Science Foundation, as 

directed by the Antarctic Conservation 

Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95–541), as 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
49798 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2011 / Notices 

1Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing 

a Functionally Equivalent Global Reseller 

Expedited Package Negotiated Service Agreement 

and Application For Non-Public Treatment of 

Materials Filed Under Seal, August 3, 2011 (Notice). 

amended by the Antarctic Science, 

Tourism and Conservation Act of 1996, 

has developed regulations for the 

establishment of a permit system for 

various activities in Antarctica and 

designation of certain animals and 

certain geographic areas requiring 

special protection. The regulations 

establish such a permit system to 

designate Antarctic Specially Protected 

Areas. 

DESCRIPTION OF PERMIT 

MODIFICATION REQUESTED: The 

Foundation issued a permit (2009–015) 

to Ron Naveen on August 25, 2008. The 

issued permit allows the applicant to 

regularly survey/census various sites in 

the Antarctic Peninsula, including some 

Antarctic Specially Protected Areas 

(ASPA’s) as part of the ongoing 

Antarctic Site Inventory Project. 

The applicant requests a modification 

to his permit to allow access to several 

ASPA’s that have substantial penguin 

and seabird populations which are 

relevant to the analysis of population 

trends. The ASPA’s the applicant 

wishes to potentially access are: ASPA 

108–Green Island, ASPA 113–Litchfield 

Island, ASPA 140–Parts of Deception 

Island, ASPA 145–Port Foster, 

Deception Island, APA 150–Ardley 

Island, and ASPA 152–Western 

Bransfield Strait. 

Location: ASPA 108–Green Island, 

ASPA 113–Litchfield Island, ASPA 

140–Parts of Deception Island, ASPA 

145–Port Foster, Deception Island, APA 

150–Ardley Island, and ASPA 152– 

Western Bransfield Strait, and the 

Antarctic Peninsula region. 

DATES: October 1, 2011 to August 31, 

2013. 

Nadene G. Kennedy, 

Permit Officer, Office of Polar Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20364 Filed 8–10–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555–01–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket No. CP2011–67; Order No. 790] 

New Postal Product 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recently-filed Postal Service request to 

enter into an additional Global Reseller 

Expedited Package contract. This 

document invites public comments on 

the request and addresses several 

related procedural steps. 

DATES: Comments are due: August 12, 

2011. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically by accessing the ‘‘Filing 

Online’’ link in the banner at the top of 

the Commission’s Web site (http:// 

www.prc.gov) or by directly accessing 

the Commission’s Filing Online system 

at https://www.prc.gov/prc-pages/filingonline/login.aspx. Commenters who 

cannot submit their views electronically 

should contact the person identified in 

the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

section as the source for case-related 

information for advice on alternatives to 

electronic filing. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 

at 202–789–6820 (case-related 

information) or DocketAdmins@prc.gov 

(electronic filing assistance). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Notice of Filing 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

I. Introduction 

On August 3, 2011, the Postal Service 

filed a notice announcing that it has 

entered into an additional Global 

Reseller Expedited Package (GREP) 

contract.1 The Postal Service asserts that 

the instant contract is functionally 

equivalent to the GREP baseline 

agreement and is supported by 

Governors’ Decision No. 10–1 attached 

to the Notice and originally filed in 

Docket No. CP2010–36. Id. at 1, 

Attachment 3. The Notice explains that 

Order No. 445, which established GREP 

Contracts 1 as a product, also authorized 

functionally equivalent agreements to be 

included within the product, provided 

that they meet the requirements of 39 

U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 1–2. Additionally, the 

Postal Service requested to have the 

contract in Docket No. CP2010–36 serve 

as the baseline contract for future 

functional equivalence analyses of the 

GREP Contracts 1 product. 

The instant contract. The Postal 

Service filed the instant contract 

pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition, 

the Postal Service contends that the 

instant contract is in accordance with 

Order No. 445. The Postal Service will 

notify the mailer of the effective date 

within 30 days after all necessary 

regulatory approvals have been 

received. Notice at 3, Attachment 1 at 5. 

The term of the contract is one year 

from the effective date. It may, however, 

be terminated by either party on not less 

than 30 days’ written notice. Id. 

In support of its Notice, the Postal 

Service filed four attachments as 

follows: 

• Attachment 1—a redacted copy of 

the contract and applicable annexes; 

• Attachment 2—a redacted copy of a 

certified statement required by 39 CFR 

3015.5(c)(2); 

• Attachment 3—a redacted copy of 

Governors’ Decision No. 10–1, which 

establishes prices and classifications for 

GREP contracts, a description of 

applicable GREP contracts, formulas for 

prices, an analysis of the formulas, and 

certification of the Governors’ vote; and 

• Attachment 4—an application for 

non-public treatment of materials to 

maintain redacted portions of the 

contract and supporting documents 

under seal. 

The Notice advances reasons why the 

instant GREP contract fits within the 

Mail Classification Schedule language 

for GREP Contracts 1. The Postal Service 

states that the instant contract differs 

from the contract in Docket No. 

CP2010–36 pertaining to customerspecific information, e.g., customer’s 

name, address, representative, signatory, 

definition of qualifying mail, discounts 

offered by the reseller, minimum 

revenue, periodic review of minimum 

commitment, assignment, number of 

rate groups and annexes, and 

solicitation of reseller’s customers. Id. at 

4–6. It states that the differences, which 

include price variations based on 

updated costing information and 

volume commitments, do not alter the 

contract’s functional equivalency. Id. at 

4. The Postal Service asserts that 

‘‘[b]ecause the agreement incorporates 

the same cost attributes and 

methodology, the relevant 

characteristics of this GREP contract are 

similar, if not the same, as the relevant 

characteristics of the contract filed in 

Docket No. CP2010–36.’’ Id. 

The Postal Service concludes that its 

filing demonstrates that the new GREP 

contract complies with the requirements 

of 39 U.S.C. 3633 and is functionally 

equivalent to the baseline GREP 

contract. It states that the differences do 

not affect the services being offered or 

the fundamental structure of the 

contract. Therefore, it requests that the 

instant contract be included within the 

GREP Contracts 1 product. Id. at 6. 

II. Notice of Filing 

The Commission establishes Docket 

No. CP2011–67 for consideration of 

matters related to the contract identified 

in the Postal Service’s Notice. 

Interested persons may submit 

comments on whether the Postal 

Service’s contract is consistent with the 

policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES