alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 162 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 162

 Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by 
   the men and women who have lost their lives while serving as law 
                         enforcement officers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 20, 2007

   Mr. Leahy (for himself, Mr. Specter, Mr. Biden, Mr. Grassley, Mr. 
Cornyn, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Reid, Mr. Durbin, and Mr. Menendez) submitted 
 the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by 
   the men and women who have lost their lives while serving as law 
                         enforcement officers.

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and 
        enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance and dedication of law 
        enforcement personnel;
Whereas more than 900,000 men and women, at great risk to their personal safety, 
        presently serve their fellow citizens as guardians of the peace;
Whereas peace officers are on the front lines in preserving the right of the 
        children of the United States to receive an education in a crime-free 
        environment, a right that is all too often threatened by the insidious 
        fear caused by violence in schools;
Whereas 147 peace officers across the United States were killed in the line of 
        duty during 2006, which is below the decade-long annual average of 167 
        deaths;
Whereas a number of factors contributed to this reduction in deaths, including--

    (1) better equipment and increased use of bullet-resistant vests;

    (2) improved training;

    (3) longer prison terms for violent offenders; and

    (4) advanced emergency medical care;

Whereas every other day, 1 out of every 16 peace officers is assaulted, 1 out of 
        every 56 peace officers is injured, and 1 out of every 5,500 peace 
        officers is killed in the line of duty somewhere in the United States; 
        and
Whereas on May 15, 2007, more than 20,000 peace officers are expected to gather 
        in Washington, D.C., to join with the families of their recently fallen 
        comrades to honor those comrades and all others who went before them: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes May 15, 2007, as ``Peace Officers Memorial 
        Day'', in honor of the Federal, State, and local officers that 
        have been killed or disabled in the line of duty; and
            (2) calls on the people of the United States to observe 
        that day with appropriate ceremonies and respect.
                                 <all>
```
#### Wilson *v.*Karst.

[No. 17,793.

Filed June 19, 1896.]

From the Warren Circuit Court.

*Reversed.*

*Stearns & Ringer, W. L. Rabourn, John Sutton, W. A. Ketcham,*Attorney-General, *C. E. Wiltsie, E. F. Ritter, F. E. Matson,*and *Duncan, Smith & Hornbrook,*for appellants.

*Lamb & Beasley, S. R. Hamill, Baker & Daniels, Stuart Bros. & Hammond, Zollars & Worden,*and *Elliott & Elliott,*for appellee.

Jordan, J.

— The same questions are involved in this appeal as were in the case of *Wilson*v. *Mathis, ante,*493. and upon the authority of the decision in that cause, the judgment of the lower court is reversed and the cause remanded.

Mo Cabe, J., took no part in this decision.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE LEYVA CRUZ,

 Petitioner,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-71594

Agency No. A072-668-382

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 24, 2016**

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Jose Leyva Cruz, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of 

removal, protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and voluntary 

 

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without 

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 2 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 13-71594

departure. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for 

substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 

1182, 1184-84 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for 

review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that even if Leyva 

Cruz had established past persecution, a showing of changed conditions in 

Guatemala rebutted any presumption of a well-founded future fear of persecution. 

See Sowe v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 1281, 1286 (9th Cir. 2008) (substantial evidence 

supported agency’s conclusion that changed country conditions rebutted 

presumption of a well-founded fear). Thus, we deny the petition as to Leyva 

Cruz’s asylum claim.

Because Leyva Cruz failed to establish eligibility for asylum, his 

withholding of removal claim necessarily fails. See Zehatye, 453 F.3d at 1190 

(petitioner’s burden of proof for withholding of removal is more demanding than 

asylum).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Leyva Cruz did not establish it is more likely than not he would be tortured at the 

instigation of, or with the acquiescence of, the Guatemalan government. See 

Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir. 2008).
3 13-71594

We reject Leyva Cruz’s contention that the BIA erred in refusing his request 

for a remand.

Finally, Leyva Cruz did not raise a constitutional or legal claim regarding 

the agency’s denial of voluntary departure, and we therefore lack jurisdiction to 

review that discretionary determination. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(f); see also 

Esquivel-Garcia v. Holder, 593 F.3d 1025, 1030 (9th Cir. 2010).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our reports included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 pertaining to the Company's 1984 and 1991 Stock Option Plans, filed on April 15, 1993, the 1995 Stock Option Plan, filed
on January 31, 1997, the amendment to the 1995 Stock Option Plan, filed on December 15, 1998, the 1999 Stock Option Plan, filed on December 15, 1998, the Summa ESOP and 401(k)
Stock Option Plan, filed on September 8, 1997, the Calnetics Stock Option Plan, filed on October 21, 1997, the Falcon Acquisition Stock Option Plan, filed on December 15, 1998,
the Plastron Acquisition Stock Option Plan, filed on May 20, 1999, and the previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-4 pertaining to the LexaLite Stock Option Plan,
filed on September 9, 1996, with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933.



Los
Angeles, California
October 30, 2001

---

QuickLinks
SUBJECT: Forest Road Stormwater Discharges

FROM: Prasad Chumble

Rural Branch

Water Permits Division, 4203M

TO: The File

DATE: 5/26/16

EPA met with the Western Governors' Association on 3 / 22 /16, to discuss the potential of the regulation

of stormwater discharges from forest roads under section 402(p)(6) of the Clean Water Act (CWA).
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Serena Software, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2007 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, Robert I. Pender, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Serena Software, Inc. certify that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Serena Software, Inc. at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    ROBERT I. PENDER,
JR.Robert I. Pender, Jr. Senior Vice President,
Finance And Administration, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial And Accounting Officer)


Date: December 17, 2007

This Certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
<PAGE>   1
                                       93





                                                                    EXHIBIT (23)




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





         We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) of Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc. of our report dated January 21, 1998,
included in Exhibit 13 to Form 10-K.

         Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of
Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc. listed in Item 14(a)(2). This schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule
referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements
taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set
forth therein.

         We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement No. 333-34663 on Form S-3 and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement No. 333-1709 both dated August 29, 1997, and in the
related prospectus dated September 19, 1997; Registration Statement No. 333-1709
on Form S-3 and Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement No.
33-9127 on Form S-3 both dated March 14, 1996, and in the related Prospectus
dated March 20, 1996; Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement
No. 33-14682 on Form S-8 dated April 28, 1989; Registration Statement No.
33-28638 on Form S-8 dated May 10, 1989; Registration Statement No. 33-54059 on
Form S-8 dated June 10, 1994; Registration Statement No. 33-55399 on Form S-8
dated September 8, 1994; and Registration Statement No. 333-33047 on Form S-8
dated August 7, 1997, of our report dated January 21, 1998, with respect to the
financial statements of Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc. incorporated herein by reference,
and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial
statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc.






                                                           /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP




Toledo, Ohio
March 23, 1998
#### Butterfield *vs.*Howe, impleaded, &c.

ALBANY,

Dec. 1837.

A testatum clause is no longer necessary in a fieri facias issued to a county different from that in which the venue is laid.

In this case among other grounds relied on for setting . aside the plaintiff’s proceedings, it was urged that the *execution*was irregular in not containing a *testatum clause:*the venue in the cause having been laid in the county of *Oneida,*and a writ *oí fieri facias*having been issued to the county of *Jefferson.*

It was. insisted on the part of the plaintiff that since the statute authorizing executions to be issued *at the same time*to sheriffs of *different counties,*2 R. S. 364, § 6, the practice of inserting a *testatum*clause, must be considered as abolished, even as a matter of form. To which it was answered that the statute did not change the practice ; that previous thereto executions were issued in the mode pointed out therein, *87at the peril ,of paying sheriffs’ fees in each county, if property to a sufficient amount to satisfy the debt was levied upon in more than one county; and that inasmuch as the statute was silent upon the subject, a *testatum*clause was as necessary now as it ever had been.

The Chief Justice denied the motion.

Anon.

An attorney is not bound to take a letter from the post -office charged with *postage,*though he has reason to believe it contains law papers, and the effect of his omission is a default of his adversary.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 71 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.71
                                                Agreed to March 14, 2008

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE CAPITOL FOR THE PRESENTATION OF 
              THE CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL.

    The rotunda of the United States Capitol is authorized to be used 
on April 23, 2008, for the presentation of the Congressional Gold Medal 
to Michael Ellis DeBakey, M.D.. Physical preparations for the conduct 
of the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions 
as may be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report as amended on Form 10-Q/A of Triad Hospitals, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, James D. Shelton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    JAMES D. SHELTON
|James D. Shelton       
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 13, 2005           



This certification
shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 530.11 Petition for review.

Any person aggrieved by the action of an authorized representative of the Administrator in granting or denying a certificate may, within 15 days thereafter or within such additional time as the Administrator for cause shown may allow, file with the Administrator a petition for review of the action of such representative praying for such relief as is desired. Such petition for review, if duly filed, will be acted upon by the Administrator or an authorized representative of the Administrator who took no part in the proceeding being reviewed. All interested parties will be afforded an opportunity to present their views in support of or in opposition to the matters prayed for in the petition.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 151 

Commending the University of Wyoming Cowgirls for their championship 

victory in the Women’s National Invitation Tournament. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 17, 2007 

Mr. ENZI (for himself and Mr. THOMAS) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the University of Wyoming Cowgirls for their 

championship victory in the Women’s National Invitation 

Tournament. 

Whereas, on March 31, 2007, the University of Wyoming 

Cowgirls defeated the University of Wisconsin Badgers 

by a score of 72–56 in the championship basketball game 

of the Women’s National Invitation Tournament; 

Whereas their victory was witnessed by a record crowd at the 

University of Wyoming Arena-Auditorium; 

Whereas the outstanding play of forward Hanna Zavecz 

earned her the award of the Women’s National Invitation 

Tournament Most Valuable Player; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 151 ATS 

Whereas the University of Wyoming Cowgirls Head Coach 

Joe Legerski led the Cowgirls basketball team to its most 

successful season in school history; and 

Whereas the University of Wyoming students and faculty are 

dedicated to academic and athletic achievement, and 

serve as the standard of excellence, scholarship, and 

sportsmanship for the entire Nation: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends the University of Wyoming Cow3 girls for their victory in the championship basketball 

4 game of the Women’s National Invitation Tour5 nament; and 

6 (2) requests the Secretary of the Senate to 

7 transmit a copy of this resolution to the University 

8 of Wyoming Cowgirls basketball team Head Coach 

9 Joe Legerski and to the University of Wyoming 

10 President Thomas Buchanan for appropriate dis11 play. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Providing for today ... preparing for tomorrow

Mark Gorman

Municipal Administrator

Sincerely,

4/~

The City and Borough of Sitka agrees that Harris Aircraft Services, Inc., provides an essential

transportation service and supports a finding of Public Convenience and Necessity. Please let

me know if any additional information is needed to support your request for an Air Carrier

Certificate. Thank you for the opportunity to support your essential transportation services.

Harris Air provides valuable services to these local communities as well as to Sitka. While a

larger air carrier, Alaska Airlines, travels between Sitka and the larger communities, its schedule

is not always conducive to regional travel and does not serve the small communities. Harris Air

Services, Inc.,. therefore provides valuable transportation links with its existing scheduled

flights, as we!l ascharter flights throughout the Southeast Alaska island archipelago.

The City and Borough of Sitka is accessible only by air and water. The community of Sitka is

located on the outer coast of Baranof Island, facing the Pacific Ocean. Due to its exposed and

isolated location, Alaska Marine Highway System ferry services are limited, especially outside

the two-month "summer season" in the schedule. Therefore persons traveling to Sitka from

the surrounding smaller communities often utilize Harris Aircraft Services to travel to and from

Sitka expeditiously. This is especially important for patients of the regional Native clinics and

hospital in Sitka, the Southeast Alaska Health Corporation, which come from the entire region.

The City and Borough of Sitka is pleased to support vour application for an Air Carrier

Certificate. Harris Aircraft Services has provided criticafly important transportation services to

and from Sitka for many years.

Dear Harris Aircraft Services, Inc.:

Harris Aircraft Services, Inc.

c/o Ali Clayton

400 Airport Road

Sitka, AK 99835

September 4, 2014

Cons[-GUllrd Cify, USA

City and Borough of Sitka

Ion Lincoln Street' Shka, Alaska 99835
### Analysis and evaluation of available hydrologic data for San Simon Basin, Cochise and Graham Counties, Arizona

By: Natalie D. White

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1619DD

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.