alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31999R2250 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999R2250

**Council Regulation (EC) No 2250/1999 of 22 October 1999 concerning the tariff quota for butter of New Zealand origin **

*
Official Journal L 275 , 26/10/1999 P. 0004 - 0004 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 2250/1999

of 22 October 1999

concerning the tariff quota for butter of New Zealand origin

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

(1) The Community concessions referred to in the agreements concluded under the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations and contained in Schedule CXL/European Communities, include a tariff quota of 76667 tonnes of butter of New Zealand origin, at least six weeks old, of a fat content by weight of not less than 80 % but less than 82 % manufactured directly from milk or cream;

(2) The eligibility under the tariff quota of butter manufactured in New Zealand using the processes referred to as "Ammix" and "Spreadable" has been questioned;

(3) In the interest of legal certainty it is appropriate to specify that such butter manufactured from milk or cream without the use of stored materials is not excluded from the tariff quota by virtue of the fact that it is manufactured by a process which may involve the cream passing through a stage of concentrated milkfat and/or the fractionation of such milkfat,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the purpose of the implementation of the tariff quota for butter of New Zealand origin, the phrase "manufactured directly from milk or cream" does not exclude butter manufactured from milk or cream, without the use of stored materials, in a single, self-contained and uninterrupted process which may involve the cream passing through a stage of concentrated milkfat and/or the fractionation of such milkfat.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 22 October 1999.

For the Council

The President

S. MÖNKÄRE
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Triad Hospitals, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, W. Stephen Love, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ W. STEPHEN LOVE    
|W. Stephen Love        
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 7, 2006       

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                         OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer
of 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. (the Company), that the Annual Report of the
Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 16, 2005
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | By:/s/
Alfred R. Kahn     
Alfred R. Kahn      Chairman of the Board and      Chief Executive
Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: March 16, 2005
|--------------------

| | By:/s/
Joseph P. Garrity     
Joseph P. Garrity      Executive Vice President and      Chief Financial
Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. and will
be retained by 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-30434

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Michael D. Gibbs,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:18-CR-164-1

Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Michael D. Gibbs has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Gibbs has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 7, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-30434 Document: 00516227912 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/07/2022
No. 21-30434

2

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-30434 Document: 00516227912 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/07/2022
#### TURNIPSEED et v BOWNESS

Ohio Appeals, 4th Dist, Ross Co

Decided December 12, 1929

Messrs. Luthei; L. Boger and Garrett S. Claypool, Chillieothe, for Turnipseed et.

Messrs. W. W. Boulger and Willard C. Walters, Chillieothe, for Bowness.

BY THE COURT

We see nothing in the motion. The journal is the work of the clerk. There is no requirement that the trial judge sign an entry. An entry prepared by counsel and approved by the court is merely a convenient method of assisting the clerk in putting on the journal the judgment or order made by the ’udge. It may be signed anywhere and need not be signed at all. The only question that may be raised in connection therewith is whether the entry on the journal expresses the judgment of the judge. There is nothing in the bill of exceptions to overthrow the presumption that the entry is in that respect correct. There is no rule of law or court requiring a judge to grant a formal hearing on such motion.

Neither bill of. exceptions herein discloses anything warranting a reversal.

Middleton, PJ., Mauck and Blosser, JJ., concur.
NOTE: This disposit ion is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-3050

PATRICK J. MARTIN,

Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

Respondent.

Katharina P. Arnhold , of Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, argued for petitioner. Of

counsel on the brief was Richard D. Casey , Lynn, Jackson, Shultz & Lebrun P.C., of

Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

Ray E. Donahue , Appellate Division, Office of General Counsel, United States

Postal Service, of Washingt on, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief was

Lori J. Dym , Chief Counsel.

Appealed from: Merit S ystems Protection BoardNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-3050

PATRICK J. MARTIN,

Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

Respondent.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD

in CASE NO(S). DE0752050388-l-2

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (LOURIE, RADER, and PROST, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED August 11, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


LOSS PER SHARE

Computation of loss per share
(in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                Nine months ended
                                                                                  September 30,
                                                                          -----------------------------
                                                                             2003                2002
                                                                           --------            --------
<S>                                                                        <C>                   <C>

Net loss ..........................................................        $(27,461)           $(26,468)
                                                                           ========            ========
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding ...............          55,424              54,407
Weighted average shares of common stock held for former
    Women.com stockholders ........................................             187                 193
Weighted average shares of common stock held for former
    Promotions.com stockholders ...................................               2                   7
                                                                           --------            --------
Adjusted weighted average shares of common stock outstanding
   used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share .........          55,613              54,607
                                                                           ========            ========
Basic and diluted net loss per share ..............................        $  (0.49)           $  (0.48)
                                                                           ========            ========
</TABLE>


                                       53
105AmendmentNo1toPreMergerCollaborationAgreement-Letterhead (1)










The Parties to that Certain     March 3, 2015
Pre Merger Collaboration Agreement,
dated February 26, 2015


Re: Amendment No. 1 to Pre Merger Collaboration Agreement, dated February 26, 2015 (the “Collaboration Agreement”), among VICTORY ENERGY CORPORATION, LUCAS ENERGY, INC., AURORA ENERGY PARTNERS, NAVITUS ENERGY GROUP, and AEP ASSETS, LLC.  


Gentlemen:


On February 26, 2015, each of the Parties entered into the Collaboration Agreement.  The Parties now desire to amend the Collaboration Agreement as set forth in this amendment (the “Amendment”).  Capitalized terms used, but not otherwise defined herein, have the meanings ascribed to them in the Collaboration Agreement.


		
	1.
	Victory to Acquire Well Rights Instead of Sub.  The Parties hereby amend the Collaboration Agreement so that Lucas assigns the Well Rights to Victory instead of Sub.  Accordingly, the Transfer Documents set forth in Exhibit B to the Collaboration Agreement are hereby amended and restated as the new Transfer Documents set forth as Attachment 1 to this Amendment. 




		
	2.
	 Transfer of Well Rights to Aurora and Sub following Funding.  Sub shall continue to be responsible for satisfying the Well Funding Requirements as specified in Section 3 of the Collaboration Agreement.  Upon complete payment and satisfaction of the Well Funding Requirements, Victory shall contribute the Well Rights to Aurora and, in turn, Aurora shall immediately contribute such Well Rights to Sub.




		
	3.
	Amendment to Section 4 of Collaboration Agreement.  Section 4 of the Collaboration Agreement is hereby amended so that Victory shall become the maker of the Note instead of Sub. Accordingly, the form of Note set forth in Exhibit C to the Collaboration Agreement is hereby amended and restated as the new form of Note set forth as Attachment 2 to this Amendment.  




		
	4.
	No other Amendments.  Except as aforesaid, the Collaboration Agreement remains unmodified and in full force and effect.














Signature
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.







	
				
	 
	VICTORY ENERGY CORPORATION
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	By: /s/ Kenneth Hill
	 

	 
	 
	Name: Kenneth Hill
	 

	 
	 
	Title:  Chief Executive Officer
	 






Date: March 3, 2015














Very truly yours,


VICTORY ENERGY CORPORATION




By:                    
Name: Fred Smith
Title: Chief Financial Officer


Accepted and agreed to as of the date first above written:


	
		
	NAVITUS ENERGY GROUP


By: JAMES CAPITAL CONSULTING LLC,
its Managing Partner


By:               
Name:
Title




	LUCAS ENERGY, INC.








By:               
Name:
Title



	AURORA ENERGY PARTNERS


By: VICTORY ENERGY CORPORATION,
its Managing Partner








By:               
Name: Fred Smith
Title: Chief Financial Officer
	AEP ASSETS, LLC 


By: AURORA ENERGY PARTNERS,
its Managing Member


By: VICTORY ENERGY CORPORATION,
its Managing Partner


By:               
Name: Fred Smith
Title: Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4915 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4915

  To establish the Servicemembers and Veterans Initiative within the 
   Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 18, 2020

  Ms. Hirono introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To establish the Servicemembers and Veterans Initiative within the 
   Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Servicemembers and Veterans 
Initiative Act of 2020.''

SEC. 2. SERVICEMEMBERS AND VETERANS INITIATIVE.

    (a) Establishment.--There is established the Servicemembers and 
Veterans Initiative within the Civil Rights Division of the Department 
of Justice.
    (b) Duties.--The Servicemembers and Veterans Initiative shall--
            (1) serve as legal and policy advisor to the Attorney 
        General on the efforts of the Department of Justice to enforce 
        criminal and civil laws that impact servicemembers, veterans, 
        and their families;
            (2) develop policy recommendations for the Attorney General 
        on how the Department of Justice may improve enforcement of 
        Federal law to support servicemembers, veterans, and their 
        families;
            (3) serve as the liaison and point of contact between the 
        Department of Justice and the military departments;
            (4) provide counsel to the Assistant Attorney General for 
        the Office of Justice Programs to ensure funding decisions take 
        into account servicemembers, veterans, and their families;
            (5) consult with components of the Department of Justice to 
        promote the provision of civil legal aid to servicemembers, 
        veterans, and their families;
            (6) serve as a liaison with the Assistant Attorney General 
        for the Criminal Division to coordinate the prosecution of 
        Federal crimes involving fraud that target servicemembers; and
            (7) enforce other Federal laws that protect servicemembers 
        and veterans, as the Attorney General determines appropriate.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 778.205 Premiums for weekend and holiday work—example.

The application of section 7(e)(6) of the Act may be illustrated by the following example: Suppose, based on a written or unwritten employment contract, agreement, understanding, handbook, policy, or practice, an employee earns $18 an hour for all hours worked on a holiday or on Sunday in the operation of machines by operators whose maximum hours standard is 40 hours and who are paid a bona fide hourly rate of $12 for like work performed during nonovertime hours on other days. Suppose further that the workweek of such an employee begins at 12:01 a.m. Sunday, and in a particular week he works a schedule of 8 hours on Sunday and on each day from Monday through Saturday, making a total of 56 hours worked in the workweek. Tuesday is a holiday. The payment of $768 to which the employee is entitled will satisfy the requirements of the Act since the employer may properly exclude from the regular rate the extra $48 paid for work on Sunday and the extra $48 paid for holiday work and credit himself with such amount against the statutory overtime premium required to be paid for the 16 hours worked over 40.

[84 FR 68771, Dec. 16, 2019]
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 5 

Honoring the life of Percy Lavon Julian, a pioneer in the field of organic 

chemistry and the first and only African-American chemist to be inducted 

into the National Academy of Sciences. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2007 

Mr. OBAMA (for himself, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. DODD, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. 

LIEBERMAN, and Mr. BAYH) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life of Percy Lavon Julian, a pioneer in the 

field of organic chemistry and the first and only AfricanAmerican chemist to be inducted into the National Academy of Sciences. 

Whereas Percy Julian was born on April 11, 1899 in Montgomery, Alabama, the son of a railway clerk and the first 

member of his family to attend college; 

Whereas Percy Julian graduated from DePauw University in 

1920 and received an M.S. degree from Harvard University in 1923 and a Ph.D. from the University of Vienna 

in 1931; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•SCON 5 IS 

Whereas, in 1935, Dr. Julian became the first to discover a 

process to synthesize physostigmine, the drug used in the 

treatment of glaucoma; 

Whereas Dr. Julian later pioneered a commercial process to 

synthesize cortisone from soy beans, enabling the widespread use of cortisone as an affordable treatment for arthritis; 

Whereas Dr. Julian was the first African-American chemist 

elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1973 for 

his lifetime of scientific accomplishments, held over 130 

patents at the time of his death in 1975, and dedicated 

much of his life to the advancement of African Americans 

in the sciences; and 

Whereas Dr. Julian’s life story has been documented in the 

Public Broadcasting Service NOVA film ‘‘Forgotten Genius’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That the Congress honors the life of Percy 

3 Lavon Julian, a pioneer in the field of organic chemistry 

4 and the first and only African-American chemist to be in5 ducted into the National Academy of Sciences. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Exhibit 10.1 Q2 FY2015






            
                
FIFTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of January 1, 2015, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("Employer") and John Heffner ("Executive").




Recitals


		
	A)
	On January 31, 2011 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive.




		
	B)
	Said Employment Agreement has been amended on four prior occasions.




		
	C)
	Employer and Executive now desire to amend the Employment Agreement, as set forth hereinbelow:




Agreement




		
	1.
	Section 2.1 of the Agreement which provides:




2.1    Salary.  For Executive's services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $343,332 during each year of the Employment Term.  Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer's normal payroll period.  Executive shall receive such salary increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine.
 
is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2015, to provide as follows:


2.1    Salary.  For Executive's services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $353,632 during each year of the Employment Term.  Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer's normal payroll period.  Executive shall receive such salary increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine.


		
	2.
	Section 3.1 of the Agreement which provides: 




		
	3.1
	Term. The term of Executive’s employment hereunder shall commence on February 1, 2011 and shall continue until January 31, 2015 unless sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter provided.




is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2015, to provide as follows:


		
	1.
	Term.  The term of Executive’s employment hereunder shall commence on February 1, 2011 and shall continue until January 31, 2016 unless sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter provided.




		
	3.
	All other terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain unaltered and fully effective.






Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.

















EXECUTIVE                        EMPLOYER
PriceSmart, INC.


John Heffner                        By: ____________________


______________________                Name: Jose Luis Laparte    
Its: President