T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T WE S T MAR K D E VE L OP ME NT C O R P O R A T I O N , aW a s hi ngt on c o rp o r a t i o n ; T R I Z E C I NV E S T ME NT C O R P O R A T I O N , aW a s hi ngt on c orpor a t i on, P l ai n t i ffs - A p p el l an t s, v . C IT Y O F B U R IE N , a m un i ci pal c orpor a t i on, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lle e . N o. 09- 35392 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 1 7 2 7 - RSM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on R i c a r do S . M a r t i ne z , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d M a r c h 8, 2010 S e a tt l e , W a s hi ngt on B efo re: T A S H IM A , F IS H E R an d B E R Z O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. W e s tm a rk D e ve l opm e ntC orpor a t i on a nd T r i z e c I nve s tm e ntC orpor a t i on ( c o lle c tiv e ly , “W e s tm a rk ” ) ap p e a l f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u r t’s s u m m a ry ju d g m e n t in



# FI LED MA R 22 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

f a v o ro f th e C ity o f

B u r ie n , f

in d in g th a t a2 0 0 5 to llin g a g r e e m e n t d id n o t ap p ly to W e s tm a rk ’s s u b s ta n tiv e d u e p r o c e s s a n d e q u a l p r o te c tio n c la im s a g a in s t th e C ity an d d i sm i ssi n g W estm ark ’ s cl ai m s as u n t i m el y. O n d e n o v o rev i ew , w e rev erse a nd r e m a nd. T he di s tr i c tc our te rr one ous l y c onc l ude d tha tthe t ol l i ng a gr e e m e ntdoe s not appl y t o W e s tm a rk’ s s e c t i on 1983 c l a i m s a ga i ns tthe C i ty . A ppl y i ng W a s hi ngt on l aw , w e d i scern th e m ean i n g o f th e ag reem en t“ ‘ b y v i ew i n g th e co n tractas a w ho l e, the subj ec tm att erand o bj ec t i ve of the contra ct , al l the ci rc um st ance s s urr oundi ng the m a ki ng of the c ontr a c t , the s ubs e que nta c t s a nd c onduc tof the pa r t i e s t o the c ontr a c t , a nd the r e a s onabl e ne s s of r e s pe c t i ve i nt e rpr e t a t i ons advo ca t ed by the part i es . ’ ” B e r g v . H ude s m an , 801 P . 2d 222, 228 ( W a s h. 1990) ( quot i ng St ender v . T

w i n C i t y Foo ds, Inc. , 510 P . 2d 221, 224 ( W a s h. 1973) ( in te rn a l q u o ta tio n m a rk s o m itte d ) ) . T h e s u b je c t m a tte ro f

th e a g r e e m e n t is to llin g . It s obj ec t i ve i s t o t ol l the l i m i t at i on s per i od du ri ng the pend encyof the st at e c ou rt p r o c e e d in g s , a n o b

je c tiv e a c c o m p lis h e d b y th e r e f ilin g la n g u a g e in p a r a g r ap h 3 . T he a gr e e m e nta s aw hol e r e f e r s t o a ll s e c tio n 1 9 8 3 d e f e n d a n ts , in c lu d in g th e C ity – n otm er el y t o the i nd i vi du al defe nd ant s. E xcl usi on of the C i ty f rom nu m bere d para graph 4 i s unrem arkabl e gi ven thatW es tm ark’ s c l ai m s a gai nstthe C i ty w er e3

f ile d in 1 9 9 6 , n o t o n O c to b e r4 , 2 0 0 4 . T h e in te rp r e ta tio n o f f e r e d b y W e s tm a rkis there fore m ore r ea sonabl e. W e r ej ec tthe C i ty’ s a rgum entthatthe t ol l i ng agre em enti s i neff ec t i ve un der M ars hal l- W

e l l s H ardw ar e C o. v . T

i t le G uar ant

y & Sur e t

yC o. , 154 P . 801, 804 ( W a s h. 1916) ( “ I n or de rt o pr e ve ntthe de f e ns e of the s t a tut e of

l i m i t a t i ons by e s t oppe l orw a i ve r , the r e m us tha ve be e n adi s t i nc ta gr e e m e ntby the pa r ty s ue d not t o i nt erpo se the defense . ”) . A ss um i ng thi s pri nci pl e c ov er s t ol l i ng as w el l as w a iv e r , th e to llin g a g r e e m e n t h e r e c o n s titu te s “ad is tin c t a g r e e m e n t.” W e a l s o r e

j e c tthe C i ty ’ s a r gum e nttha tthe t ol l i ng a gr e e m e nti s i nope r a t i ve b e c a u s e it au th o r iz e s to llin g f o ra n in d e f

in ite p e r io d o f

tim e . Se e J

. A . C a m p b e ll C o. v . H ol s um B aki ng C o. , 1 3 0 P .2 d 3 3 3 , 3 4 0 ( W a s h . 1 9 4 2 ) . T h e a g r e e m e n t is defi ni t e a s t o t i m e bec ause i tt ol l s the l i m i t at i on s per i od fr om the vo l un t ary d i sm i ssal o f th e fed eral act i o n th ro u g h th e reso l u t i o n o f th e st at e co u rtp ro ceed i n g s. T he C i ty’ s uno pp osed m ot i on t o sup pl em entthe excerpt s of r ec ord, fi l ed Au g u s t2 0 , 2 0 0 9 , i s GR AN T E D. RE V E RS E D A ND RE MAND E D.