alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 162 

Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by 

the men and women who have lost their lives while serving as law 

enforcement officers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 20, 2007 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. 

CORNYN, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. REID, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. 

BROWNBACK, Mr. KOHL, Mr. KENNEDY, and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

APRIL 25, 2007 

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment 

MAY 1, 2007 

Considered and agreed to and with an amended preamble 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by the men and women who have lost their 

lives while serving as law enforcement officers. 

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is 

preserved and enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance 

and dedication of law enforcement personnel; 

Whereas more than 900,000 men and women, at great risk 

to their personal safety, presently serve their fellow citizens as guardians of the peace; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

SRES 162 ATS 

Whereas peace officers are on the front lines in protecting the 

schools and schoolchildren of the United States; 

Whereas 147 peace officers across the United States were 

killed in the line of duty during 2006, which is below the 

decade-long annual average of 167 deaths; 

Whereas a number of factors contributed to this reduction in 

deaths, including— 

(1) better equipment and increased use of bullet-resistant vests; 

(2) improved training; 

(3) longer prison terms for violent offenders; and 

(4) advanced emergency medical care; 

Whereas every other day, 1 out of every 16 peace officers is 

assaulted, 1 out of every 56 peace officers is injured, and 

1 out of every 5,500 peace officers is killed in the line 

of duty somewhere in the United States; and 

Whereas on May 15, 2007, more than 20,000 peace officers 

are expected to gather in Washington, D.C., to join with 

the families of their recently fallen comrades to honor 

those comrades and all others who went before them: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes May 15, 2007, as ‘‘Peace Offi3 cers Memorial Day’’, in honor of the Federal, State, 

4 and local officers that have been killed or disabled 

5 in the line of duty; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

SRES 162 ATS 

1 (2) calls on the people of the United States to 

2 observe that day with appropriate ceremonies and 

3 respect. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 6 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

#### § 6.17 Amendments to pleadings.

At any time prior to the close of the hearing record, the complaint or answer may be amended with the permission of the Administrative Law Judge and on such terms as he/she may approve. When issues not raised by the pleadings are reasonably within the scope of the original complaint and are tried by express or implied consent of the parties, they shall be treated in all respects as if they had been raised in the pleadings, and such amendments may be made as necessary to make them conform to the evidence. Such amendments shall be allowed when justice and the presentation of the merits are served thereby, provided there is no prejudice to the objecting party's presentation on the merits. A continuance in the hearing may be granted or the record left open to enable the new allegations to be addressed. The presiding Administrative Law Judge may, upon reasonable notice and upon such terms as are just, permit supplemental pleadings setting forth transactions, occurrences or events which have happened since the data of the pleadings and which are relevant to any of the issues involved.
#### Grelle et al. *v.*Wright.

[No. 17,791.

Filed June 19, 1896.]

From the Fulton Circuit Court.

*Reversed.*

*Holman & Stephenson, W. A. Ketcham,*Attorney-General, *C. S. Wiltsie, F. E. Matson, E. F. Ritter,*and *Duncan, Smith & Hornbrook,*for appellants.

*Lamb & Beasley, S. R. Hamill, Baker & Daniels, Stuart Bros. & Hammond, Zollars*& *Worden, Elliott & Elliott,*and *Conner, Rowley & McMahan,*for appellee.

Jordan, J.

— This was a proceeding by the appellee to obtain a license to sell intoxicating liquors, against the granting of which a remonstrance under the Act of 1895'was filed. (Acts of 1895, p. 248).

The main question .presented by this appeal is the right of remonstrators to withdraw their names after the three days’ period has commenced to run. The trial court held that this right existed and permitted the remonstrators to exercise it. This appeal was considered and the question involved decided adversely to the contentions of the appellee herein in the case of *The State*v. *Gerhardt, ante,*439.

For the error of the trial court upon its ruling upon this point the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000402

22-MAY-2019

08:23 AM
§ 505.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The regulations contained in this part set forth the procedures which are deemed necessary and appropriate to carry out the provisions of section 5(i) and section 7(g) of the National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, 20 U.S.C. 954(i), 20 U.S.C. 956(g). As a condition to the receipt of any grant, the grantees must give adequate assurances that all professional performers and related or supporting professional personnel employed on projects or productions assisted by grants from the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities shall receive not less than the prevailing minimum compensation as determined by the Secretary of Labor.
( b ) Regulations and procedures relating to wages on construction projects as provided in section 5(j) and section 7(j) of the National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, may be found in parts 3 and 5 of this title.
( c ) Standards of overtime compensation for laborers or mechanics may be found in the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, 76 Stat. 357, 40 U.S.C. 327 *et seq.* and part 5 of this title.
§ 4043.2 Definitions. The following terms are defined in § 4001.2 of this chapter: benefit liabilities, Code, contributing sponsor, controlled group, ERISA, fair market value, irrevocable commitment, multiemployer plan, PBGC, person, plan, plan administrator, plan year, single-employer plan, ultimate parent, and U.S. entity. In addition, for purposes of this part: *De minimis 10-percent segment* means, in connection with a plan's controlled group, one or more entities that in the aggregate have for a fiscal year— ( 1 ) Revenue not exceeding 10 percent of the controlled group's revenue;
( 2 ) Annual operating income not exceeding the greater of— ( i ) 10 percent of the controlled group's annual operating income; or
( ii ) $5 million; and
( 3 ) Net tangible assets at the end of the fiscal year(s) not exceeding the greater of— ( i ) 10 percent of the controlled group's net tangible assets at the end of the fiscal year(s); or
( ii ) $5 million.
*De minimis 5-percent segment* has the same meaning as *de minimis* 10-percent segment, except that “5 percent” is substituted for “10 percent” each time it appears.
*Event year* means the plan year in which a reportable event occurs.
*Foreign entity* means a member of a controlled group that— ( 1 ) Is not a contributing sponsor of a plan;
( 2 ) Is not organized under the laws of (or, if an individual, is not a domiciliary of) any state (as defined in section 3(10) of ERISA); and
( 3 ) For the fiscal year that includes the date the reportable event occurs, meets one of the following tests— ( i ) Is not required to file any United States federal income tax form;
( ii ) Has no income reportable on any United States federal income tax form other than passive income not exceeding $1,000; or
( iii ) Does not own substantial assets in the United States (disregarding stock of a member of the plan's controlled group) and is not required to file any quarterly United States tax returns for employee withholding.
*Foreign parent* means a foreign entity that is a direct or indirect parent of a person that is a contributing sponsor of a plan.
*Low-default-risk* has the meaning described in § 4043.9.
*Notice due date* means the deadline (including extensions) for filing notice of a reportable event with PBGC.
*Participant* means a participant as defined in § 4006.2 of this chapter.
*Public company* means a person subject to the reporting requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or a subsidiary (as defined for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of a person subject to such reporting requirements.
*Substantial owner* means a substantial owner as defined in section 4021(d) of ERISA.
*Well-funded plan safe harbor* has the meaning described in § 4043.10.
[80 FR 55002, Sept. 11, 2015, as amended at 83 FR 49806, Oct. 3, 2018; 85 FR 6061, Feb. 4, 2020]
1

Sutton, Lisa

From: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 10:29 AM

To: Lorang, Phil

Cc: Schillo, Bruce; Balserak, Paul; Sutton, Lisa; Coda, Tom; Brachtl, Megan; Johnson, Yvonne 

W; Long, Pam; Wood, Anna

Subject: Summary of Additional Interagency Comments Under EO 12866 and 13563 -- Supplemental 

Proposal to Address Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction (SSM) Affirmative Defense 

Provisions in SIPs

Attachments: SummaryofInteragencyCommentsunderEO12866_13563_SSM SIP SNPR_compar ver of 

7-17_to_ver of 8-27-2014_1133_9_3.docx

Attached please find a summary of additional interagency comments under EO 12866 and 13563 regarding the 

Supplemental Proposal to Address Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction (SSM) Affirmative Defense Provisions in SIPs. 

Please let me know if you have any questions.
§ 519.3 Application for a full-time student certificate. ( a ) Whenever the employment of full-time students working outside of school hours in agriculture or in a retail or service establishment at wages lower than the minimum applicable under section 6 of the Fair Labor Standards Act is believed to be necessary to prevent curtailment of opportunities for employment and employment of them will not create a substantial probability of reducing the full-time employment opportunities of the other workers, an application for a certificate may be filed by their employer with the appropriate Regional Office of the Wage and Hour Division (or the Denver, Colorado Area Office for Colorado, North Dakota, and South Dakota; the Salt Lake City, Utah area Office for Montana, Utah, and Wyoming; and the Caribbean Office for the area it covers). Such application shall be signed by an authorized representative of the employer.
( b ) The application must be filed in duplicate on official forms or exact copies thereof. The forms are available at the offices mentioned in paragraph (a) of this section. The application must contain the information as to the type of products sold or services rendered by the establishment, hours of employment during the preceding twelve-month period or data from previous certificates (or applications) as pertinent to the application, and other information for which request is made on the form.
( c ) Separate application must be made for each farm or establishment in which authority to employ full-time students at subminimum wage rates is sought.
( d ) Application for renewal of a certificate shall be made either on the same type of form as is used for a new application or on an alternate official form. No certificate in effect shall expire until action on such an application shall have been finally determined, provided that such application has been properly executed, and is received by the office specified in paragraph (a) of this section not less than 15 nor more than 30 days prior to the expiration date. A properly executed application is one which fully and accurately contains the information required on the form, and the required certification by an authorized representative of the employer.
#### § 503.46 Commencement of proceeding.

Each administrative proceeding permitted under 8 U.S.C. 1184(c)(14) and the regulations in this part will be commenced upon receipt of a timely request for hearing filed in accordance with § 503.43.
#### § 458.92 Compliance with decisions and orders of the Administrative Review Board.

When remedial action is ordered, the respondent shall report to the Director, within a specified period, that the required remedial action has been effected. When the Director finds that the required remedial action has not been effected, he shall refer the matter for appropriate action to the Federal Labor Relations Authority (in the case of labor organizations covered by the CSRA), the Foreign Service Labor Relations Board (in the case of labor organizations covered by the FSA), or the Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance (in the case of labor organizations covered by the Congressional Accountability Act).

[78 FR 8027, Feb. 5, 2013]
#### § 502.39 Service upon attorneys for the Department of Labor—number of copies.

Two copies of all pleadings and other documents required for any administrative proceeding provided herein shall be served on the attorneys for the DOL. One copy shall be served on the Associate Solicitor, Division of Fair Labor Standards, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210, and one copy on the Attorney representing the Department in the proceeding.
(79 South. 316)

#### SNYDER v. STATE.

(7 Div. 538.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 29, 1918.)

Criminal Law <@=>992 — Verdict—Sentence.

A verdict, “We, the jury, find the. defendant guilty as charged in the statement, and assess a fine of four hundred dollars,” shows a conviction for only one offense, and assessment of only one fine, and a judgment sentencing defendant to an additional term at hard labor was erroneous.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Etowah County ; J. E. Blackwood, Judge.

Arthur Snyder was convicted of crime, and he appeals.

Affirmed in part, and reversed and remanded in part.

M. M. Davidson, of Gadsden, for appellant. F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., and Emmett S. Thigpen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

BROWN, P. J.

The verdict of the jury is in this form:

> “We, the jury, find the defendant guilty as charged in the statement, and assess a fine of four hundred dollars.”

We are of opinion that this verdict clearly shows a conviction for only one offense, and the assessment of only one fine, and that the judgment of the court, sentencing the defendant to an additional term of 12 months’ hard labor, is erroneous. Mulligan v. State, 15 Ala. App. 204, 72 South. 761; Stout v. State, 15 Ala. App. 206, 72 South. 762.

There being no error in the judgment of conviction, that judgment is affirnled. The sentence, however, is hereby set aside and annulled, and the cause is remanded that a proper sentence may be pronounced, in accordance with the law. Mulligan v. State, supra.

Affirmed in part, in part reversed and remanded.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Health and Insurance Plans Under Collective Bargaining : Hospital Benefits, Early 1959

              																	Kittner, Dorothy Ruth. 						*Health and Insurance Plans Under Collective Bargaining : Hospital Benefits, Early 1959 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1274*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										March 1960,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4550,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### § 458.85 Transcript.

An official reporter shall make the only official transcript of such proceedings. Copies of the official transcript will be provided to the parties, in accordance with the provisions of part 70 of this title, or they may be examined in the district office in whose geographic jurisdiction the hearing has been held.

[45 FR 15158, Mar. 7, 1980. Redesignated at 50 FR 31311, Aug. 1, 1985, as amended at 63 FR 33780, June 19, 1998]
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 167 ) ll-K-(C)- 3 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:54

AM Sheet 167 of 325P. 2 

# /A \ 

# R 

# a = 0 II-K-(C)- 3
SINGLE-CARCOAL TRANSPORTATIO N COS T FORECASTS . Lette r fro

m T . Hogan , EE

A t o N . Clarke , Interstat e Commerc e Commission . Decembe r 19 , 1979 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(C)- 3
----

References for preliminary rulings by the Tribunal des affaires de sécurité sociale de Saint-Etienne by judgments of that Tribunal of 5 April 2004 in the following cases: SAS Nazairdis against Caisse Nationale de l'Organisation Autonome d'Assurance Vieillesse des Travailleurs Non-Salariés des Professions Industrielles et Commerciales — Caisse ORGANIC, JACELI SA against Caisse Nationale de l'Organisation Autonome d'Assurance Vieillesse des Travailleurs Non-Salariés des Professions Industrielles et Commerciales — Caisse ORGANIC, KOMOGO SA against Caisse Nationale de l'Organisation Autonome d'Assurance Vieillesse des Travailleurs Non-Salariés des Professions Industrielles et Commerciales — Caisse ORGANIC, Tout pour la maison SARL against Caisse Nationale de l'Organisation Autonome d'Assurance Vieillesse des Travailleurs Non-Salariés des Professions Industrielles et Commerciales — Caisse ORGANIC, SAS Distribution Casino France against Caisse Nationale de l'Organisation Autonome d'Assurance Vieillesse des Travailleurs Non-Salariés des Professions Industrielles et Commerciales — Caisse ORGANIC

(Cases C-266/04, C-267/04, C-268/04, C-269/04, C-270/04)

(2004/C 228/44)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by judgments of the Tribunal des affaires de sécurité sociale de Saint-Etienne (Saint-Etienne Social Security Tribunal) (France) of 5 April 2004, received at the Court Registry on 24 June 2004 and 25 June 2004 (Case C-270/04), for a preliminary ruling in the following cases:

The Tribunal des affaires de sécurité sociale de Saint-Etienne asks the Court of Justice of the European Communities to give a preliminary ruling on the following question:

Should Article 87 EC be interpreted as meaning that State funding by France through the Comité Professionnel de la Distribution des Carburants (Fuel Distributors' Trade Committee) (‘the CPDC’) and through the Fonds d'Intervention pour la Sauvegarde de l'Artisanat et du Commerce (Intervention Fund for the Support of Crafts and Trade) (‘the FISAC’) by way of assistance when self-employed craftsmen and traders retire and grants made to the old-age insurance scheme for self-employed persons in manufacturing and trading occupations, and to the scheme for self-employed persons in the craft sector constitute State aid?

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 58 (Tuesday, March 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 18324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07017]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, April 5, 2013.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of this or any future meetings change, an 
announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the 
meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Melissa D. Jurgens, 202-418-5516.

Natise Stowe,
Executive Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2013-07017 Filed 3-22-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
Exhibit
24
 
 **POWER
      OF ATTORNEY****Annual
      Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended****December
      31, 2004**
 
 The
undersigned directors of the following companies (each respectively the
"Company"):
  **Company**
    **State
      of Incorporation**Appalachian
      Power Company
    VirginiaColumbus
      Southern Power Company
    OhioKentucky
      Power Company
    KentuckyOhio
      Power Company
    Ohio
 
 do hereby
constitute and appoint MICHAEL G. MORRIS, STEPHEN P. SMITH and SUSAN TOMASKY,
and each of them, their attorneys-in-fact and agents, to execute for them, and
in their names, and in any and all of their capacities, the Annual Report of the
Company on Form 10-K, pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, and any and all amendments
thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to
do and perform every act and thing required or necessary to be done, as fully to
all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of
them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this
26 th day of
January, 2005.
 
 
 /s/
      Carl L. English
    /s/
      Michael G. Morris/s/
      John B. Keane
    /s/
      Robert P. Powers/s/
      Holly K. Koeppel
    /s/
      Stephen P. Smith/s/
      Venita McCellon-Allen
    /s/
      Susan Tomasky
Exhibit 31.4

Certification

I, Charles P. Cooley, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of The Lubrizol Corporation; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Charles P. Cooley  
|Charles P. Cooley      
|Chief Financial Officer
|April 28, 2011