alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1


                             CERTIFICATE OF TRUST


         The undersigned, the trustees of Merrill Lynch Preferred Capital Trust
VI, desiring to form a business trust pursuant to Delaware Business Trust Act,
12 Del. C. Section 3810, hereby certify as follows:

         (a)   The name of the business trust being formed hereby (the "Trust")
               is "Merrill Lynch Preferred Capital Trust VI."

         (b)   The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust which
               has its principal place of business in the State of Delaware is
               as follows:

                      Chase Manhattan Bank Delaware
                      c/o John J. Cashin
                      1201 Market Street
                      Wilmington, Delaware  19801

         (c)   This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as of the date of
               filing.

Dated:  December 3, 1998


                                            /s/ Theresa Lang
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Name:  Theresa Lang
                                            Title: Regular Trustee

                                            /s/ Stanley Schaefer
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Name:  Stanley Schaefer
                                            Title: Regular Trustee


                                            Chase Manhattan Bank Delaware

                                            By:  : /s/ Denis Kelly
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Name:  Denis Kelly
                                            Title: Trust Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS (LOSS) OF
THE LOUISIANA LAND AND EXPLORATION COMPANY AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.  THIS SCHEDULE HAS BEEN RESTATED
TO CONFORM TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT CLASSIFICATIONS ADOPTED IN 1996.  
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                            DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                                       10,300
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               143,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                                  38,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            206,600
<PP&E>                                                    3,120,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                            1,913,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            1,467,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       200,600
<BONDS>                                                     691,600
<COMMON>                                                      5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  365,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              1,467,700
<SALES>                                                     822,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            822,200
<CGS>                                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               718,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             36,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           38,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              28,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 10,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          18,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 18,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0.56
Dear Ms. Dean and Mr. Bilyak:

This letter is to inform you that the following inform ation is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-1889). This information is necessary for the Federa l Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Sect ion 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from yo ur proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requeste d response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to proce ss your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 8/11/15. If we do no t receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Dan Ngo FAA Office of Rulemaking
§ 4044.11 Priority category 1 benefits. ( a ) *Definition.* The benefits in priority category 1 are participants' accrued benefits derived from voluntary employee contributions.
( b ) *Assigning benefits.* Absent an election described in the next sentence, the benefit assigned to priority category 1 with respect to each participant is the balance of the separate account maintained for the participant's voluntary contributions. If a participant has elected to receive an annuity in lieu of his or her account balance, the benefit assigned to priority category 1 with respect to that participant is the present value of that annuity.
Exhibit 4.121


 


Power of Attorney


 


	Principal:	Tao Jia
	ID No.:	110105197802109636
	Address:	32F, Tengda Plaza, No.168 Xiwai Street, HaiDian District, Beijing
	 	 
	Agent:	Leilei Wang
	ID No.:	110102197304020437
	Address:	No.1001, Building 1, Xiao Yang Yi Bin Hutong, Dongcheng District, Beijing


 


The Principal, Tao Jia, a citizen of the People’s
Republic of China, hereby authorizes Mr. Wang Leilei to exercise all voting powers as a shareholder of Xiamen Xinreli Technology
Co., Ltd. (“Xinreli”) during the term of this Power of Attorney, including not limited to acting as the
authorized representative to nominate and elect senior management officers such as directors, general manager at shareholders’
meetings of Xinreli.


 


Unless consented by the board of directors
of KongZhong Information Technologies (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (“KongZhong Beijing”), the aforesaid authorization
is irrevocable. The Principal also agrees that KongZhong Beijing is entitled to appoint a new agent to replace the original agent,
and will execute relevant documents and take all necessary actions to complete the new appointment.


 


The Agent, with the authorization of the Principal,
shall exercise shareholders’ voting powers of Xinreli with due diligence and care, and will act in accordance with directions
of the board of directors of KongZhong Beijing.


 


This Power of Attorney will come into effect
on the date of execution and will expire upon dissolution of KongZhong Beijing.


 





	/s/ Tao Jia 	(Signature)
	Tao Jia
	Date: December 1, 2014
(75 South. 703)

#### WILLIAMS v. STATE.

(3 Div. 287.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 29, 1917.)

1. Witnesses @=>337(6) — Impeachment—Conviction of Crime — Statute.

Code 1907, § 4009, providing that a witness may *be*examined touching his conviction for crime, and his answers contradicted, changed the rule previously existing, and accused may he examined regarding his prior conviction for larceny.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Witnesses, Cent. Dig. §§ 1132, 1140-1142, 1146-1148.]

2. Criminal Law @=>1160 — Review—Motion for New Trial.

Where there was evidence tending to prove accused’s guilt, denial of his motion for new trial will not be disturbed on appeal.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. § 3084.]

Appeal from City Court of Montgomery; Gaston Gunter, Judge.

Jim Williams was convicted of crime, and appeals.

Affirmed.

Brassell & Brassell, of Montgomery, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BROWN, P. J.

[1] The rule, prevailing before the adoption of the Code of 1907, relative to the examination of a witness touching his conviction for crime, was changed by section 4009 of the Code, which provides:

> “A witness may be examined touching his conviction for crime, and his answers may be contradicted by other evidence.”

See Moore v. State, 12 Ala. App. 243, 67 South. 789.

Under this statute, it was. permissible for the state, on cross-examination of the defendant, to elicit evidence touching his conviction of larceny, an offense involving moral turpitude. Moton v. State, 13 Ala. App. 43, 69 South. 235.

[2] There was evidence tending to prove the defendant’s guilt, and the ruling of the trial court on the motion for new .trial will not be disturbed. Sou. Ry. Co. v. Kirsch, 150 Ala. 659, 43 South. 796.

Affirmed.
June 17, 2010

RECEIVED

Ms. Diana Esher (3APOO)

Director 010

Air Protection Division 3AP40 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Region III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Dear Ms.r: J, 4 ‘- —

In Septber 1998, Delaware adopted the Standards of Performance for

Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators (HMIWI) under Section 29 of 7 DE Admin Code

1120 of State of Delaware “Regulations Governing the Control ofAir Pollution”. On September 17, 1998, the State submitted a complete and approvable Section 111(d)/129 plan (HMIWI plan)

to enforce the regulatory provisions of this adoption.

The Administrator approved Delaware’s HMIWI plan; publishing its final rule in the Federal

Register (65 FR 20086) on April 14, 2000. The final rule, found at 40 CFR Part 62 Paragraphs 62.1975-1977, applies to all Delaware existing HMIWI for which construction was commenced

on or before June 20, 1996. The final rule became effective on June 13, 2000.

The three designated sources identified in Delaware’s HMIWI Plan submittal have shut down

and all incinerators were dismantled and removed as indicated below.

PRINTED ON

RECYCLED PAPER

Designated source Located in... Dismantled in...

E.I. duPont de Nemours & Co., Inc. Wilmington 1999 Experimental Station

Kent General Hospital Dover 2006

Nanticoke Memorial Hospital Seaford 1998

j

Ve1a(,aJze 7ood T(a’w Vefte#id4 ot
which is stipulated at 40 CFR Part 62, Paragraphs 62.1975-1977, and requests approval ofthis

negative declaration.

As always, feel free to contact me or Ron Amirikian, Planning Manager, (302) 739-9402, if you

have any questions concerning this request.

Sincerely,

Ac

Au Mirzakhalili, P.E.Administrator

cc: Walter Wilkie, EPA Region 3

James Topsale, EPA Region 3

Ronald Amirikian
#### § 5.40 Severability.

The provisions of this part are separate and severable and operate independently from one another. If any provision of this part is held to be invalid or unenforceable by its terms, or as applied to any person or circumstance, or stayed pending further agency action, the provision is to be construed so as to continue to give the maximum effect to the provision permitted by law, unless such holding is one of utter invalidity or unenforceability, in which event the provision is severable from this part and will not affect the remaining provisions.
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

| /s/Alfred R. Kahn                                                             |   | January _10__, 2011                |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
| Alfred R. Kahn                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |   | Date of Executionby Alfred R. Kahn |

----

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |   |                                                                                                |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  4Kids Entertainment Licensing, Inc.  By:  /s/ Samuel R. Newborn                                                               |   |  January _10___, 2011Date of Executionby 4Kids Entertainment Licensing, Inc.    |

| By:  /s/Samuel R. Newborn                                                              |   | January __10__, 2011Date of Executionby 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----
#### § 33.7 Employment.

No qualified individual with handicaps shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the Department. The definitions, requirements and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established in 29 CFR part 1613 (subpart G), shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.

[52 FR 11606, Apr. 9, 1987; 52 FR 23967, June 26, 1987]
§ 32.28 Architectural standards. ( a ) *Design and construction.* Each facility or part of a facility constructed by, on behalf of, or for the use of a recipient shall be designed and constructed in such manner that the facility or part of the facility is readily accessible to and usable by qualified handicapped individuals, if the construction was commenced after the effective date of this part.
( b ) *Alteration.* Each facility or part of a facility which is altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of a recipient after the effective date of this part in a manner that affects or could affect the usability of the facility or part of the facility shall, to the maximum extent feasible, be altered in such manner that the altered portion of the facility is readily accessible to and usable by qualified handicapped individuals.
( c ) *Standards for architectural accessibility.* Design, construction, or alteration of facilities under this subpart shall meet the most current standards for physical accessibility prescribed by the General Services Administration under the Architectural Barriers Act at 41 CFR 101-19.6. Alternative standards may be adopted when it is clearly evident that equivalent or greater access to the facility or part of the facility is thereby provided.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration 

          - [FDA 225-99-7000] 

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is providing notice of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between FDA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Department of Defense, and the Environmental Protection Agency. The purpose of the MOU is to establish an interagency coordinating committee on animal production and food health with the goal of improving animal and public health. 

# DATES:

The agreement became effective November 17, 1999. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert C. Livingston, Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV-1), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 301-594-5903. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with 21 CFR 20.108(c), which states that all written agreements and MOU's between FDA and others shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    , the agency is publishing notice of this MOU.                 

Dated: May 19, 2000. 

William K. Hubbard, 

Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation. 

The MOU is set forth in its entirety as follows: 
      ( print page 34201)          ( print page 34202)          ( print page 34203)          ( print page 34204)          ( print page 34205)          ( print page 34206)          ( print page 34207)          ( print page 34208)          ( print page 34209)          ( print page 34210)          ( print page 34211)    

BILLING CODE 4160-01-F 

[FR Doc. 00-13208 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-01-C
798 A.2d 1273

#### Michael G. LEVINE v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (NEWELL CORP. AND TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO.), Petition of Newell Corp. and Travelers Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

June 10, 2002.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of June, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted and the case is remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Judge to consider whether Claimant’s claim petition was timely filed based on this Court’s decision in *Schreffler v. WCAB (Koeher Coal Company),*567 Pa.527, 788 A.2d 968 (2002).
§ 453.1 Scope and significance of this part. ( a ) *Functions of the Department of Labor.* This part discusses the meaning and scope of section 502 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959[1] (hereinafter referred to as the Act), which requires the bonding of certain officials, representatives, and employees of labor organizations and of trusts in which labor organizations are interested. The provisions of section 502 are subject to the general investigatory authority of the Secretary of Labor, embodied in section 601 of the Act (and delegated by him to the Director), which empowers him to investigate whenever he believes it necessary in order to determine whether any person has violated or is about to violate any provisions of the Act (except title I or amendments to other statutes made by section 505 or title VII). The Department of Labor is also authorized, under the general provisions of section 607, to forward to the Attorney General, for appropriate action, any evidence of violations of section 502 developed in such investigations, as may be found to warrant criminal prosecution under the Act or other Federal law.
( b ) *Purpose and effect of interpretations.* Interpretations of the Director with respect to the bonding provisions are set forth in this part to provide those affected by these provisions of the Act with “a practical guide * * * as to how the office representing the public interest in its enforcement will seek to apply it.”[2] The correctness of an interpretation can be determined finally and authoritatively only by the courts. It is necessary, however, for the Director to reach informed conclusions as to the meaning of the law to enable him to carry out his statutory duties of administration and enforcement. The interpretations of the Director contained in this part, which are issued upon the advice of the Solicitor of Labor, indicate the construction of the law which will guide him in performing his duties unless and until he is directed otherwise by authoritative rulings of the courts or unless and until he subsequently decides that a prior interpretation is incorrect. However, the omission to discuss a particular problem in this part, or in interpretations supplementing it, should not be taken to indicate the adoption of any position by the Director with respect to such problem or to constitute an administrative interpretation or practice.
( c ) *Earlier interpretations superseded.* To the extent that prior opinions and interpretations under the Act, relating to the bonding of certain officials, representatives, and employees of labor organizations and of trusts in which labor organizations are interested, are inconsistent or in conflict with the principles stated in this part, they are hereby rescinded and withdrawn.
[28 FR 14394, Dec. 27, 1963, as amended at 50 FR 31309, Aug. 1, 1985; 78 FR 8026, Feb. 5, 2013] Footnotes -
453.1
[1] 73 Stat. 536; 29 U.S.C. 502.
[2] *Skidmore* v. *Swift & Co.,* 323 U.S. 134, 138.