alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1978.103 Filing of retaliation complaints. ( a ) *Who may file.* An employee who believes that he or she has been retaliated against by an employer in violation of STAA may file, or have filed by any person on the employee's behalf, a complaint alleging such retaliation.
( b ) *Nature of filing.* No particular form of complaint is required. A complaint may be filed orally or in writing. Oral complaints will be reduced to writing by OSHA. If the complainant is unable to file a complaint in English, OSHA will accept the complaint in any other language.
( c ) *Place of filing.* The complaint should be filed with the OSHA office responsible for enforcement activities in the geographical area where the employee resides or was employed, but may be filed with any OSHA officer or employee. Addresses and telephone numbers for these officials are set forth in local directories and at the following Internet address: *http://www.osha.gov .*
( d ) *Time for filing.* Within 180 days after an alleged violation of STAA occurs, any employee who believes that he or she has been retaliated against in violation of STAA may file, or have filed by any person on the employee's behalf, a complaint alleging such retaliation. The date of the postmark, facsimile transmittal, electronic communication transmittal, telephone call, hand-delivery, delivery to a third-party commercial carrier, or in-person filing at an OSHA office will be considered the date of filing. The time for filing a complaint may be tolled for reasons warranted by applicable case law.
( e ) *Relationship to section 11(c) complaints.* A complaint filed under STAA alleging facts that would also constitute a violation of section 11(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.S.C. 660(c), will be deemed to be a complaint under both STAA and section 11(c). Similarly, a complaint filed under section 11(c) that alleges facts that would also constitute a violation of STAA will be deemed to be a complaint filed under both STAA and section 11(c). Normal procedures and timeliness requirements under the respective statutes and regulations will be followed.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A

				(Mark One)
	[X]  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997

Commission File Number 1-06124

LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
No. 13-0982660
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)

300 First Stamford Place

Stamford, CT
06912-0014
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (203) 969-8600

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 
	Title of each class	
	Name of each exchange
	on which each class registered	
          Common Stock, par value $1.00
New York Stock Exchange
                    per share

           Common Stock Purchase Rights
New York Stock Exchange
          Common Stock Purchase Warrants
New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None



PART IV

ITEM 14.  EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.

	  (a)	The following documents are filed as a part of this Report: 

			27 - Financial Data Schedule (filed herewith).


SIGNATURES

  Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

						LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

							By:	/s/ JAMES W. LANGHAM     
							    JAMES W. LANGHAM
							    Vice President, General
							    Counsel and Secretary

							Date: April 9, 1998
(75 South. 1006)

#### LEWIS v. STATE.

(6 Div. 302.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 8, 1917.)

Appeal' from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; H. P. Heflin, Judge.

Thomas M. Rogers, of Birmingham, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BROWN, P. J.

We have examined the record, and find no error therein. Affirmed.
#### § 452.55 Statutory provisions concerning nomination.

In elections subject to the provisions of title IV a reasonable opportunity must be afforded for the nomination of candidates. Although the Act does not prescribe particular forms of nomination procedures, it does require that the procedures employed be reasonable and that they conform to the provisions of the labor organization's constitution and bylaws insofar as they are not inconsistent with the provisions of title IV.
§ 452.41 Working at the trade. ( a ) It would ordinarily be reasonable for a union to require candidates to be employed at the trade or even to have been so employed for a reasonable period. In applying such a rule an unemployed member is considered to be working at the trade if he is actively seeking such employment. Such a requirement should not be so inflexible as to disqualify those members who are familiar with the trade but who because of illness, economic conditions, or other good reasons are temporarily not working.
( b ) It would be unreasonable for a union to prevent a person from continuing his membership rights on the basis of failure to meet a qualification which the union itself arbitrarily prevents the member from satisfying. If a member is willing and able to pay his union dues to maintain his good standing and his right to run for office, it would be unreasonable for the union to refuse to accept such dues merely because the person is temporarily unemployed. Where a union constitution requires applicants for membership to be actively employed in the industry served by the union, a person who becomes a member would not be considered to forfeit his membership in the union or any of the attendant rights of membership merely because he is discharged or laid off.
( c ) Ordinarily members working part-time at the trade may not for that reason alone be denied the right to run for office.
( d ) A labor organization may postpone the right to run for office of members enrolled in a bona fide apprenticeship program until such members complete their apprenticeship.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              26
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,503
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (200)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,980
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,589
<PP&E>                                           6,608
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,091)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,910
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,475
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           413
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,524)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,910
<SALES>                                          8,815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,675
<CGS>                                            3,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,319
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     29
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 29
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        29
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1178

Geophysical Data from offshore of the Gulf Islands National Seashore, Cat Island to Western Horn Island, Mississippi

----

Title Page / Contents / List of Figures / Conversion Factors and Datum / Abstract / Introduction / Data Acquisition and Processing / Data Catalog / Acknowledgments / References Cited

----

**Figure 2**. The R/V *Tommy Munro* western survey area stretching from Cat Island to western Horn Island. The lines indicate geophysical survey tracklines.

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey
```

[Federal Register: July 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 130)]
[Notices]               
[Page 39204]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08jy10-36]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

 
Notice of Public Information Collections Being Reviewed by the 
U.S. Agency for International Development; Comments Requested

SUMMARY: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is making 
efforts to reduce the paperwork burden. USAID invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on the following proposed and/or continuing information collections, as 
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act for 1995. Comments are 
requested concerning: (a) Whether the proposed or continuing 
collections of information are necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the burden estimates; (c) 
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information 
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on the respondents, including the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

DATES: Submit comments on or before September 7, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Johnson, Bureau for 
Management, Office of Administrative Services, Information and Records 
Division, U.S. Agency for International Development, Room 2.07-106, 
RRB, Washington, DC 20523, (202) 712-1365 or via e-mail at 
bjohnson@usaid.gov.

ADDRESSES: Send comments via e-mail at ssegal@usaid.gov or mail 
comments to: Sabrina Segal, Office of the General Counsel (A/GC), 
United States Agency for International Development, Ronald Reagan 
Building, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20523, (202) 
712-5409.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB No: OMB 0412-0581.
    Form No.: N/A.
    Title: Disaster and Emergency Relief Information.
    Type of Review: Renewal of Information Collection.
    Purpose: The purpose of this Information Collection is to enable 
the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to collect 
information from members of the public as it relates to in-kind 
donations or expressions of interest to volunteer in response to an 
international disaster or emergency where USAID has been tasked with 
relief or recovery responsibilities.
    Annual Reporting Burden:
    Respondents: 2,000.
    Total Annual Responses: 2,000.
    Total Annual Hours Requested: 500 hours.

    Dated: June 28, 2010.
Roberto Miranda, Director,
Office of Administrative Services, Bureau for Management.
[FR Doc. 2010-16465 Filed 7-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
```
## State of N ew York Su p reme C ou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: December 11, 2014 518447

________________________________ In the Matter of ALLAH McCALL, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: October 21, 2014 Before: Peters, P.J., Rose, Egan Jr., Lynch and Clark, JJ.

__________ Allah McCall, Romulus, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner became disruptive as he approached a gate emptying into the prison yard, and he struck a correction officer with his shoulder as he walked through the gate. He then punched the officer and had to be subdued. Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with assaulting staff, engaging in violent conduct and creating a disturbance. He pleaded guilty to creating a disturbance and, at the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing, was found guilty of the remaining charges. The determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.-2- 518447

We confirm. The misbehavior report, documentary evidence and testimony of the correction officer who was involved in the altercation provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Alsaifullah v Fischer, 118 AD3d 1239, 1240 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 906 [2014]; Matter of Wright v Fischer, 98 AD3d 759, 759 [2012]). Although petitioner and his witness offered a differing account of the incident, their testimony presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see id.). Finally, petitioner's contention that the Hearing Officer erred in denying his request for the medical records of the officer involved in the assault is unavailing, as there was no allegation that petitioner caused any physical injury to the officer. Under these circumstances, the medical records were irrelevant. Peters, P.J., Rose, Egan Jr., Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
§ 4003.5 Non-timely request for review. PBGC will process a request for review of an initial determination that was not filed within the prescribed period of time for requesting review (see §§ 4003.32 and 4003.52) if— ( a ) The person requesting review demonstrates in his or her request that he or she did not file a timely request for review because he or she neither knew nor, with due diligence, could have known of the initial determination; and
( b ) The request for review is filed within 30 days after the date the aggrieved person, exercising due diligence at all relevant times, first learned of the initial determination where the requested review is reconsideration, or within 45 days after the date the aggrieved person, exercising due diligence at all relevant times, first learned of the initial determination where the request for review is an appeal.
[61 FR 34012, July 1, 1996, as amended at 85 FR 10284, Feb. 24, 2020]
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

ABDUL MAHADDIE UNDERWOOD, Petitioner.

NO. 1 CA-CR 21-0310 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2016-115949-001

The Honorable William R. Wingard, Judge Pro Tempore

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Amanda M. Parker

Counsel for Respondent

Abdul Mahaddie Underwood, Eloy

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Peter B. Swann, Judge David D. Weinzweig, and Judge 

Paul J. McMurdie delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 12-9-2021
STATE v. UNDERWOOD

Decision of the Court

2

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Abdul Mahaddie Underwood seeks review of the 

superior court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This 

is petitioner’s third petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is 

petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by 

denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 

537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of 

establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion.

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
#### § 452.131 Casting of ballots; delegate elections.

The manner in which the votes of the representatives are cast in the convention is not subject to special limitations. For example, the voting may be by secret ballot, by show of hands, by oral roll call vote, or if only one candidate is nominated for an office, by acclamation or by a motion authorizing the convention chairman to cast a unanimous vote of the delegates present.
§ 38.43 Required maintenance of records by recipients. ( a ) Each recipient must maintain the following records, whether they exist in electronic form (including email) or hard copy, for a period of not less than three years from the close of the applicable program year: ( 1 ) The records of applicants, registrants, eligible applicants/registrants, participants, terminees, employees, and applicants for employment; and
( 2 ) Such other records as are required under this part or by the Director.
( b ) Where a discrimination complaint has been filed or compliance review initiated, every recipient that possesses or maintains any type of hard-copy or electronic record related to the complaint (including records that have any relevance to the underlying allegations in the complaint, as well as records regarding actions taken on the complaint) or to the subject of the compliance review must preserve all records, regardless whether hard-copy or electronic, that may be relevant to a complaint investigation or compliance review, and maintain those records for a period of not less than three years from the date of final action related to resolution of the complaint or compliance review.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT (23)

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement No. 333-34663 on Form S-3 and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement No. 333-1709 both dated August 29, 1997, and in the
related Prospectus dated September 19, 1997; Registration Statement No.
333-1709 on Form S-3 and Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration
Statement No. 33-9127 on Form S-3 both dated March 14, 1996, and in the
related Prospectus dated March 20, 1996; Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to
Registration Statement No. 33-14682 on Form S-8 dated April 28, 1989;
Registration Statement No. 33-28638 on Form S-8 dated May 10, 1989;
Registration Statement No. 33-54059 on Form S-8 dated June 10, 1994;
Registration Statement No. 33-55399 on Form S-8 dated September 8, 1994;
Registration Statement No. 333-33047 on Form S-8 dated August 7, 1997;
Registration Statement No. 333-52039 on Form S-8 dated May 4, 1998;
Registration Statement No. 333-52041 on Form S-8 dated May 4, 1998; and
Registration Statement No. 333-52043 on Form S-8 dated May 4, 1998, of our
report dated January 27, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K), for the 
year ended December 31, 1998 of Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc.

                                         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Toledo, Ohio
March 23, 1999



                                      -82-
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 761

# Acronyms and Abbreviations

----

#### Home | Acronyms | Contents | Navigation | Photos and Maps | Logs | Metadata

----

----

#### Home | Acronyms | Contents | Navigation | Photos and Maps | Logs | Metadata

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |            U.S. Geological Survey                                                URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/761/pubs761/html/acronyms.html            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact                        Page Last Modified: Thursday, April 11, 2013, 10:12:10 AM
Albany

Atlanta

Brussels

Denver

Los Angeles

Miami

New York 1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

Tel: 703.336.8800

mckennalong.com Northern Virginia

Orange County

Rancho Santa Fe

San Diego

San Francisco

Seoul

Washington, DC

Mark E. McKinnon

703.336. 8708 EMAIL ADDRESS

mmckinnon @mckennalong.com

January 30, 2015

Re: Additional Information Filed in Support of Phoenix Air UNMANNED , LLC

Section 333 Petition for Exemption (Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0692 )

Gentlemen:

As you are aware, this office represents Phoenix Air UNMANNED , LLC (Phoenix Air

UNMANNED") regarding the above

- referenced Petition for Exemption, in which Phoenix Air

UNMANNED seeks regulatory relief to operate s mall unmanned aircraft system ("sUAS") for

c ommercial purposes. Please accept this letter as confirmation that a copy of the Phoenix AIR

UNMANNED UAS Operations Manual , which contains proprietary and con fidential

information, was hand

- delivered to Mr. T routman at the FAA Office of Aviation Safety, Airmen

and Airspace Rules Division, on January 29, 2015.

If you have any other questions, or need any additional information to process this

exemption request, please do not hesitate to call.

M C K ENNA L ONG & A LDRIDGE LLP

/ s/ Ma rk E. McKinnon

Mark E. McKinnon, Esq.
#### § 4903.9 When will PBGC suspend or terminate debt collection on a debt owed to PBGC?

If, after pursuing all appropriate means of collection, PBGC determines that a debt owed to PBGC is uncollectible, PBGC may suspend or terminate debt collection activity in accordance with the provisions of 31 CFR part 903. Termination of debt collection activity by PBGC does not discharge the indebtedness.