alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 103 (Friday, May 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13249]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Bureau of Labor Statistics


Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Committee; Appointment of 
Members

    This is to announce the appointment of members to the Federal 
Economic Statistics Advisory Committee (FESAC), established under the 
provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (Public 
Law 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2, 6(c)). The membership of the Committee is 
as follows:

Professor Ernst R. Berndt, Chair, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Dr. Barry P. Bosworth, Brookings Institution
Professor Franklin M. Fisher, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Professor John C. Haltiwanger, University of Maryland
Dr. Sallie Keller-McNulty, Los Alamos National Laboratory
Professor Alan B. Krueger, Princeton University
Dr. Judith T. Lessler, Research Triangle Institute
Professor Lisa M. Lynch, Tufts University
Professor Joseph Sedransk, Case Western Reserve University
Professor Matthew D. Shapiro , University of Michigan
Professor John B. Taylor, Stanford University
Professor Kirk M. Wolter, University of Chicago

    The Committee will present advice and make recommendations to the 
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Department of 
Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis and Bureau of the Census (the 
Agencies) from the perspective of the professional economics and 
statistics communities. The Committee is a technical committee composed 
of economists, statisticians, and behavioral scientists who are 
recognized for their attainments and objectivity in their respective 
fields. Committee members will be called upon to analyze the issues 
involved in producing Federal economic statistics and recommend 
practices that will lead to optimum efficiency, effectiveness, and 
cooperation among the Agencies. These initial appointments are for one-
, two- or three-year terms, to provide staggered three-year terms 
overall. Professor Ernst R. Berndt will serve as Committee Chairperson.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 19th day of May 2000.
Katharine G. Abraham,
Commissioner of Labor Statistics.
[FR Doc. 00-13249 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 7, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00721

- CV

HARVEY V. RISIEN, LLC and Harvey V. Risien

,

Appellants

v.

MISSARK INVESTMENTS GP, LLC , Missark Investments LP, JH Design LP, and GM GP Management, LLC, Appellees

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI15535

Hon orable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellees’ motion for an extension of time to file their brief is granted. We order the appellees’ brief due December 21, 2018

.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereun to set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of December, 20 18

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### § 403.10 Publication of reports required by this part.

Inspection and examination of any report or other document filed as required by this part, and the furnishing by the Office of Labor-Management Standards of copies thereof to any person requesting them, shall be governed by part 70 of this title.

[35 FR 2990, Feb. 13, 1970]
#### § 778.3 Interpretations made, continued, and superseded by this part.

On and after publication of this part in the Federal Register, the interpretations contained therein shall be in effect and shall remain in effect until they are modified, rescinded or withdrawn. This part supersedes and replaces the interpretations previously published in the Federal Register and Code of Federal Regulations as part 778 of this chapter. Prior opinions, rulings and interpretations and prior enforcement policies which are not inconsistent with the interpretations in this part or with the Fair Labor Standards Act as amended are continued in effect; all other opinions, rulings, interpretations, and enforcement policies on the subjects discussed in the interpretations in this part are rescinded and withdrawn. Questions on matters not fully covered by this part may be addressed to the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210, or to any Regional Office of the Division.

[46 FR 7309, Jan. 23, 1981]
§ 531.52 General restrictions on an employer's use of its employees' tips. ( a ) A tip is a sum presented by a customer as a gift or gratuity in recognition of some service performed for the customer. It is to be distinguished from payment of a charge, if any, made for the service. Whether a tip is to be given, and its amount, are matters determined solely by the customer. An employer that takes a tip credit against its minimum wage obligations is prohibited from using an employee's tips for any reason other than that which is statutorily permitted in section 3(m)(2)(A): As a credit against its minimum wage obligations to the employee, or in furtherance of a tip pool limited to employees who customarily and regularly receive tips. Only tips actually received by an employee as money belonging to the employee may be counted in determining whether the person is a “tipped employee” within the meaning of the Act and in applying the provisions of section 3(m)(2)(A) which govern wage credits for tips.
( b ) Section 3(m)(2)(B) of the Act provides that an employer may not keep tips received by its employees for any purposes, regardless of whether the employer takes a tip credit. ( 1 ) An employer may exert control over an employee's tips only to distribute tips to the employee who received them, require employees to share tips with other employees in compliance with § 531.54, or, where the employer facilitates tip pooling by collecting and redistributing employees' tips, distribute tips to employees in a tip pool in compliance with § 531.54.
( 2 ) An employer may not allow managers and supervisors to keep any portion of an employee's tips, regardless of whether the employer takes a tip credit. A manager or supervisor may keep tips that he or she receives directly from customers based on the service that he or she directly and solely provides. For purposes of section 3(m)(2)(B), the term “manager” or “supervisor” shall mean any employee whose duties match those of an executive employee as described in § 541.100(a)(2) through (4) or § 541.101 of this chapter.
[85 FR 86789, Dec. 30, 2020, as amended at 86 FR 52986, Sept. 24, 2021]
§ 38.44 CRC access to information and information sources. ( a ) Each grant applicant and recipient must permit access by the Director or the Director's designee during its hours of operation to its premises and to its employees and participants, to the extent that such individuals are on the premises during the course of the investigation, for the purpose of conducting complaint investigations, compliance reviews, or monitoring activities associated with a State's development and implementation of a Nondiscrimination Plan, and for inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts and other materials as may be pertinent to ascertain compliance with and ensure enforcement of the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIOA or this part.
( b ) Asserted considerations of privacy or confidentiality are not a basis for withholding information from CRC and will not bar CRC from evaluating or seeking to enforce compliance with the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIOA and this part.
( c ) Whenever any information that the Director asks a grant applicant or recipient to provide is in the exclusive possession of another agency, institution, or person, and that agency, institution, or person fails or refuses to furnish the information upon request, the grant applicant or recipient must certify to CRC that it has made efforts to obtain the information and that the agency, institution, or person has failed or refused to provide it. This certification must list the name and address of the agency, institution, or person that has possession of the information and the specific efforts the grant applicant or recipient made to obtain it.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 222 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 222

 Supporting the goals and ideals of Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2007

   Mrs. Clinton (for herself and Mr. Smith) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 
                          Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Supporting the goals and ideals of Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month.

Whereas over 37,170 people will be diagnosed with pancreatic cancer this year in 
        the United States;
Whereas pancreatic cancer is the 4th most common cause of cancer death in the 
        United States;
Whereas 75 percent of pancreatic cancer patients die within the first year of 
        their diagnosis and only 5 percent survive more than 5 years, making 
        pancreatic cancer the deadliest of any cancer;
Whereas there has been no significant improvement in survival rates in the last 
        25 years and pancreatic cancer research is still in the earliest 
        scientific stages;
Whereas there are no early detection methods and minimal treatment options for 
        pancreatic cancer;
Whereas when symptoms of pancreatic cancer generally present themselves, it is 
        too late for an optimistic prognosis, and the average survival rate of 
        those diagnosed with metastasis of the disease is only 3 to 6 months;
Whereas the incidence rate of pancreatic cancer is 40 to 50 percent higher in 
        African Americans than in other ethnic groups; and
Whereas it would be appropriate to observe November as Pancreatic Cancer 
        Awareness Month to educate communities across the Nation about 
        pancreatic cancer and the need for research funding, early detection 
        methods, effective treatments, and treatment programs: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Senate supports the goals and ideals of 
Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THIRD QUARTER 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH HUADING FINANCIAL NETWORK INC.
</LEGEND>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                    JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                136,533
<SECURITIES>                                       22,011,301
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      136,533
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     22,663,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               1,045,856
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                           13,200,000
<OTHER-SE>                                         21,617,229
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       22,663,085
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         197,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (197,060)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (197,060)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.01)



</TABLE>
§ 500.121 Coverage and level of insurance required. ( a ) Except where a liability bond pursuant to § 500.124 of this part has been approved by the Secretary, a farm labor contractor, agricultural employer or agricultural association shall, in order to meet the insurance requirements in § 500.120, obtain a policy of vehicle liability insurance.
( b ) The amount of vehicle liability insurance shall not be less than $100,000 for each seat in the vehicle, but in no event is the total insurance required to be more than $5,000,000 for any one vehicle. The number of seats in the vehicle shall be determined by reference to § 500.105(b)(3)(vi). See § 500.122 regarding insurance requirements where State workers' compensation coverage is provided.
( c ) The insurance to be obtained under paragraph (a) of this section shall be issued by an insurance carrier licensed or otherwise authorized to do business in the State in which the insurance is obtained.
( d ) The vehicle liability insurance to be obtained under paragraph (a) of this section shall be endorsed to insure against liability for personal injury to employees whose transportation is not covered by workers' compensation insurance, and to persons who are not employees; and for property damage as specified in (b) of this section.
( e ) An agricultural employer or agricultural association may evidence the purchase of liability insurance which covers the workers while being transported, as required under paragraph (a) by obtaining and making available upon request to the Department of Labor a completed liability certificate of insurance showing that insurance conforming to the limits required by paragraph (b) and the coverage required by paragraph (d) of this section is in effect. A farm labor contractor must obtain such a certificate and provide a copy to the Administrator when applying for authorization to transport migrant or seasonal agricultural workers.
( f ) With respect to an agricultural employer or agricultural association, in the absence of the insurance certificate referred to under paragraph (e) of this section, the Department of Labor will look to the actual policy of insurance in determining compliance with the insurance requirements.
[48 FR 36741, Aug. 12, 1983, as amended at 57 FR 3905, Jan. 31, 1992; 61 FR 24866, May 16, 1996]
#### Clifton C. Shinn, receiver, &c., v. Gustave A. Kummerle et al.

[Submitted April 11th, 1907.

Decided May 1st, 1907.]

The General Corporation act, sections 64 and 86 *(P. L. 1896 pp. 298, SOI/),*making preferments in contemplation of insolvency void, does not authorize equity at the suit of the receiver of a corporation to set aside a judgment against it in favor of the wife of its president, resulting from his activity in her behalf and the purposeless inaction of the remaining directors.

On bill by a receiver to set’ aside a judgment.

*Messrs. Thompson & Cole,*for the complainant.

*Mr. Edward A. Armstrong,*for the defendants.

Leaking, Y. C.

I am unable to reach the conclusion contended for by complainant. It is clear that to relieve against the judgment in question the provisions of sections 64 and 86 of the General Corporation act must be extended beyond their terms and beyond *829any scope heretofore given to these sections by the adjudicated cases.

Had the evidence disclosed a concerted plan among the directors to protect this claim by permitting it to go to judgment and then to secure a receivership to prevent the procurement of other judgments, it would be difficult to distinguish the transaction in its inherent equality from a confessed judgment or a voluntary transfer of assets by way of preference, but I am compelled from the evidence to view the judgment as the legitimate result of selfish activity upon the part of the president, in behalf of his wife, involuntarily aided by a purposeless inaction upon the part of the remaining directors. The court of chancery cannot relieve against this unfortunate and unjust situation.

I will advise a decree dismissing the bill.
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE August 30 , 2016 Session

I N RE 

### ADONNIAS P. ET AL



### .

Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Knox County No. 50970 Timothy E. Irwin, Judge

No. E2016

- 01102

- COA

- R3

- PT

- FILED

- AUGUST 30, 2016

The Notice of Appeal in this termination of parental rights case was filed pro se by the appellant/mother on May 26, 2016. In it

, she indicates her desire to appeal from a final judgment entered on May 5, 2015. Because the Notice of Appeal was not timely filed, we lack j urisdiction to consider this appeal.

Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed

T HOMAS R. F RIE RSON

, II, J., D. M ICHAEL S WINEY

, C.J., AND C HARLES D. S USANO

, J R

., J.

Holly P., Lenoir City, Tennessee

, Pro S e.

Herbert H. Slatery, III, Attorney General and Reporter, and Martha A. Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, General Civil Division, for the ap pellee, Tennessee Department of

Children

= s Services.

Katheryn Kristina Murray Ogle, Knoxville, Tennessee, Guardian Ad Litem.2 MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

B efore transmission of the record for this appeal, the Court directed the pro se appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction based upon the untimely filing of the Notice of Appeal. In that order, the Court noted that a timely appeal from the Trial Court ’ s final order in the proceedings below already had been dismissed by unpublished order. See In Re Adonnias P., et al. , No. E2015

- 01751

- COA

- R3

- PT, order (Tenn. Ct. App., filed Feb. 23, 2016). The appellant has filed no response to the

Court ’ s show cause order.

In order to be timely, a notice of appeal must “ be filed with and received by the clerk of the trial court within 30 days after the date of entry of the judgment appealed from. ” Tenn. R. App. P. 4(a). “ The thirty

- day time limit for filing a notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional in civil cases. ” Albert v. Frye , 145 S.W.3d 526, 528 (Tenn. 2004).

Because the Notice of Appeal in this case was not filed until more than a year after the judgment to which it is directed, we lack jurisdiction to consider the appeal. This appeal is

dismissed. Costs on appeal are taxed to the appellant, Holly P., for which execution may issue if necessary.

PER CURIAM

1 Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals provides as follows:

This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a

case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall be designated

“ MEMORANDUM OPINION, ” shall not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 145 

Congratulating Zach Johnson on his victory in the 2007 Masters golf 

tournament. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 10, 2007 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Mr. HARKIN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Zach Johnson on his victory in the 2007 

Masters golf tournament. 

Whereas, on April 8, 2007, Zach Johnson, a native Iowan, 

won the Masters Tournament at the Augusta National 

Golf Club in Augusta, Georgia; 

Whereas, the Masters has been won by some of golf’s greatest champions, including Byron Nelson, Sam Snead, Ben 

Hogan, Arnold Palmer, Gary Player, Jack Nicklaus, 

Tiger Woods, Phil Mickelson, and many others; 

Whereas, Zach Johnson’s final round of three-under-par 69 

for a total score of 289 was two strokes better than that 

of any other competitor; 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 145 ATS 

Whereas, in a final day on which six different players led, 

Zach Johnson showed great skill, patience and will to 

withstand the challenge of the weather and the course; 

Whereas, Zach Johnson is the first Iowan to win the Masters, 

and the first Iowan to win a major championship in golf 

since Jack Fleck’s playoff victory over Ben Hogan in the 

1955 U.S. Open; and 

Whereas, Zach Johnson has brought great pride and honor 

to his family, friends, and the citizens of Iowa with his 

victory: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate congratulates Zach John2 son on his outstanding accomplishment in winning the 

3 2007 Masters golf tournament. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44689

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

ALONDRA SALINAS RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2017 Unpublished Opinion No. 521

Filed: July 17, 2017

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Melissa Moody, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and 365-day jail sentence for petit theft, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Brian R. Dickson, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Alondra Salinas Rodriguez was found guilty of petit theft, Idaho Code § 18-2407. The 

district court imposed a 365-day sentence in the county jail. Rodriguez appeals, contending that 

her sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 
2

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Rodriguez’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
§ 500.223 Caption of proceeding. ( a ) Each administrative proceeding instituted under the Act and these regulations shall be captioned in the name of the person requesting such hearing, and shall be styled as follows: In The Matter of __, Respondent.
( b ) For the purposes of such administrative proceeding the “Secretary of Labor” shall be identified as plaintiff and the person requesting such hearing shall be named as respondent.