alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Russell D. White, Ph.D., DABT

Manager, Health Sciences

Research and Scientific Affairs Department

1220 L Street, NW

Washington, DC 20005-4070

USA

Telephone 202-682-8344

Fax 202-682-8270

Email whiter@api.org

www.api.org

December 11, 2009

Karl Simon

Division Director

Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division

Office of Transportation and Air Quality 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. 

Mail Code: 6406J

Washington, DC 20460

RE: Fuels and Fuel Additives Health Effects Testing Regulations: Submission of Peer Reviewer 

Comments and Responses for Draft Study No. 00-6130 On Gasoline DIPE Vapor Condensate

Dear Mr. Karl Simon:

The American Petroleum Institute (API), on behalf of the Section 211(b) Research Group (RG), is 

submitting the following information to EPA as partial fulfillment of the CAA Section 211(b) Alternative Tier 

2 requirements of the testing regulation:

Comments from Dr. Thomas Goldsworthy

Comments from Dr. Richard Schlesinger

RG response to comments

Draft Study Report No. 00-6130 (Gasoline DIPE Vapor Condensate: A 13-Week Whole-Body 

Inhalation Toxicity Study In Rats With Neurotoxicity Assessments and 4-Week In Vivo 

Genotoxicity And Immunotoxicity Assessments)

When the final report is complete, it will be submitted to you at the EPA Office of Transportation and Air 

Quality, Transportation and Regional Programs Division, as part of the requirements of Clean Air Act 

Section 211(b)(2) and 211(e) (Docket No. A-90-07). 

Please contact Paula Podhasky (202-682-8344) or myself if there are questions about this submission.

Regards,

Encl (1): CD containing the files; 

a) Comments from Dr. Thomas Goldsworthy

b) Comments from Dr. Richard Schlesinger

c) RG response to comments

d) Study No. 00-6130 (Gasoline DIPE Vapor Condensate: A 13-Week Whole-Body Inhalation 

Toxicity Study In Rats With Neurotoxicity Assessments and 4-Week In Vivo Genotoxicity And 

Immunotoxicity Assessments)

e) GFAP Levels in Specific Rat Brain Areas Following A 13-Week Whole-Body Inhalation Exposure 

to Gasoline DIPE Vapor Condensate
f) Immunological Evaluation of Gasoline DIPE Vapor Condensate in Female Sprague Dawley Rats 

Using the Plaque Forming Cell Assay

g) Satellite Procedure Gasoline DIPE Vapor Condensate Rat Micronucleus Test

h) In Vivo-In Vitro Rat Peripheral Lymphocyte Sister Chromatid Exchange Assay 

Cc: Joe Sopata, EPA (via email)
IIA 

Calendar No. 731 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 28 

[Report No. 110–334] 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission 

with respect to broadcast media ownership. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 5, 2008 

Mr. DORGAN (for himself, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. KERRY, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. DODD, 

Mr. OBAMA, Mr. HARKIN, Mrs. CLINTON, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. BIDEN, 

Mr. REED, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. TESTER, Mr. STEVENS, 

Mr. LEAHY, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. 

MENENDEZ, Mr. BROWN, Mrs. MURRAY, Mrs. MCCASKILL, Mr. WYDEN, 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. DURBIN, and Mr. LEVIN) submitted 

the following resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

MAY 8, 2008 

Reported by Mr. INOUYE, without amendment 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission with respect to broadcast media ownership. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the FedVerDate Aug 31 2005 00:18 May 09, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ28.RS SJ28

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

SJ 28 RS 

1 eral Communications Commission relating to broadcast 

2 media ownership (Report and Order FCC 07–216), re3 ceived by Congress on February 22, 2008, and such rule 

4 shall have no force or effect. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Calendar No. 731 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 28 

[Report No. 110

–334] 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal 

broadcast media ownership. Communications Commission with respect to 

MAY 8, 2008 

Reported without amendment 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT      31.2**

***Certifications***

| (a)   | All                significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or                operation of internal control over financial reporting which are                reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to                record,                process, summarize and report financial information;                and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b)   | Any                fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other                employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal                control                over financial reporting. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**L.      J. McLAUGHLIN**
LETTER OF EXEMPTION REQUEST June 11, 2013 To Whom It May Concern: Myname is Keith Sidney Teague and I am seeking exemption from FAR91.147 (d) for the air tour LOA I possess, operate and ownundermyname, Keith Teague, Part 91 IDNo. KHTJGL09. The business address for this operation is 09424 Ferry Road EastJordan, MI 49727 My reason for request is not wholly for an exemption but rather a deviation. As well as the LOA stated above I also own anoperate an Part 135 Air Carrierknow as Fresh Air Aviation based and operated from the same airport as my LOA, the Charlevoix Municipal Airport (KCVX). I am currently, and have been for the last 7 years actively involved inFresh Air's drug and alcohol testing program. Fresh Air's Drug and Alcohol Program is an approved program and maintains strict industry standards. Its records are maintained in literally the same office as that which the LOA is operated from. Therefore to have a separate Drug and Alcohol Program for the LOA "Keith Teague" which I amthe sole operatorofwould be completely redundant and from my perspective, irrelevant. My exemption, orrather deviation request is to simply allow my involvement and participation in FreshAirAviations Drug and Alcohol Program to stand inlieu and satisfy any and all requirements to establish a separate program for the LOA of"KeithTeague AirTours". This deviation (exemption) would inno way adversely effectthe outcome orreason(s) for drug testing and would satisfy the requirements to do so to the highest degree while atthe same time streamline the process, eliminate confusion ofduplicate records and also ease the financial burdenofmaintainingtwo separate programs designed to do the same thing. I thank you for your review, understanding and acceptance ofthis request. Please feel free to contactme at anytime for any questions you may have. Sincerely, \

. 

# J 

# \f

Keith Teague

# 't1,V\V'-\~~ Director ofOperations, Fresh Air Aviation & LOA operator, Keith Teague Air Tours, Part 91 ID No. KHTJGL09 231237 9482
### Fw: CO NAAQS briefing for our 1 PM meeting Deirdre Murphy to: Sherry Russell 08/12/2011 03:31 PM 

### This is email to OMB w. briefing slides.

----- Forwarded by Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/12/2011 03:31 PM ----- From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US To: "Christine J. Kymn" <Christine

_J.

_ Kymn@omb.eop.gov> Cc: "Deirdre Murphy" <murphy.deirdre@epa.gov>, "Karen Martin" <martin.karen@epa.gov>, "Nealson Watkins" <Watkins.Nealson@epamail.epa.gov>, king. j an@epa.gov Date: 07/28/2011 10:02 AM Subject: CO NAAQS briefing for our 1 PM meeting 

### Christine, Attached are the slides for our 1 PM meeting today on the CO NAAQS. Thanks. Lydia Deirdre Murphy ----- Original Message ----- **From:** Deirdre Murphy **Sent:** 07/28/2011 09:56 AM EDT **To:** Lydia Wegman **Subject:** CO - slides for omb
LETTER OF EXEMPTION REQUEST 

June 11, 2013 

To Whom It May Concern: 

My name is Keith Sidney Teague and I am seeking exemption from FAR 91.147 (d) for the air 

tour LOA I possess, operate and own under my name, Keith Teague, Part 91 ID No. 

KHTJGL09. The business address for this operation is 

09424 Ferry Road 

East Jordan, MI 49727 

My reason for request is not wholly for an exemption but rather a deviation. As well as the LOA 

stated above I also own an operate an Part 135 Air Carrier know as Fresh Air Aviation based and 

operated from the same airport as my LOA, the Charlevoix Municipal Airport (KCVX). I am 

currently, and have been for the last 7 years actively involved in Fresh Air's drug and alcohol 

testing program. 

Fresh Air's Drug and Alcohol Program is an approved program and maintains strict industry 

standards. Its records are maintained in literally the same office as that which the LOA is 

operated from. Therefore to have a separate Drug and Alcohol Program for the LOA "Keith 

Teague" which I am the sole operator of would be completely redundant and from my 

perspective, irrelevant. 

My exemption, or rather deviation request is to simply allow my involvement and participation 

in Fresh Air Aviations Drug and Alcohol Program to stand in lieu and satisfy any and all 

requirements to establish a separate program for the LOA of"Keith Teague Air Tours". 

This deviation (exemption) would in no way adversely effect the outcome or reason(s) for drug 

testing and would satisfy the requirements to do so to the highest degree while at the same time 

streamline the process, eliminate confusion of duplicate records and also ease the financial 

burden of maintaining two separate programs designed to do the same thing. 

I thank you for your review, understanding and acceptance of this request. Please feel free to 

contact me at anytime for any questions you may have. 

Sincerely, \ . J \f 

Keith Teague 't1,V\V'-\~~ Director of Operations, Fresh Air Aviation 

& 

LOA operator, Keith Teague Air Tours, Part 91 ID No. KHTJGL09 

231237 9482
(77 South. 1005)

#### THURMAN v. STATE.

(6 Div. 365.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Dec. 18, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; C. W. Ferguson, Judge.

W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### § 4043.33 Application for minimum funding waiver.

A reportable event for a plan occurs when an application for a minimum funding waiver for the plan is submitted under section 302(c) of ERISA or section 412(c) of the Code.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in
connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Serena Software, Inc. (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code.



I, Robert I. Pender, Jr.,
Chief Financial Officer of Serena Software, Inc. certify that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Serena Software, Inc.
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    ROBERT I. PENDER, JR.Robert I. Pender, Jr. Senior Vice President,
Finance And Administration, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial And Accounting Officer) And Director




Date: June 9, 2004
#### § 458.75 Intervention.

Any person desiring to intervene in a hearing shall file a motion in writing in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 458.72 or, if made at the hearing, may move orally on the record, stating the grounds upon which such person claims an interest. Such a motion shall be filed with the Administrative Law Judge who shall rule upon such motion.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002**

| 1. | To                the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements                of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | To                the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report                fairly                presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results                of                operations of the Registrant. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                Wu Yiting           |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Wu                Yiting               |
| Title: | Chief                Executive Officer |
|   |                                   |
| By:    | /s/                Wu Yaxu             |
| Name:  | Wu                Yaxu                 |
| Title: | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
AAM-12-340-E May 23, 2012

Exemption No. 10539 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0462

Mr. Ron Overacker

President Blue Sky Aviation, Inc.

P.O. Box 1495 Tulare, CA 93275

Dear Mr. Overacker:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the list of conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 17, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Blue Sky Aviation, Inc. (BSA) for an exemption from part 121, appendices I and J of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow BSA to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program.

Although you requested relief from part 121, appendices I and J, that section has since been redesignated to part 120. The redesignation was included in the “Drug and Alcohol Testing Program” final rule published in the Federal Register on May 12, 2009 (74 FR 22649).

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to BSA.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA2

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Blue Sky Aviation, Inc. an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow BSA, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of BSA are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the BSA part 135 operations, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6060

BART FITZGERALD MCCLAIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Avery-Mitchell Facility; OFFICER FOX; OFFICER

EDWARDS; CODY BLAKE STEWART, Correctional

Officer; BRUCE C. CARPENTER, Correctional

Officer; JAY CARTER, Lieutenant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-01-20-1-MU-2)

Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 28, 2003

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bart Fitzgerald McClain, Appellant Pro Se. Deborrah Lynn Newton,

Assistant Attorney General, James Philip Allen, Roy Cooper, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,

for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Bart Fitzgerald McClain seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion to compel. This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and

certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order McClain seeks to appeal is

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral

order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 4.6


 


	NUMBER	 	SHARES
	ING-___	 	___


 


INERGETICS, INC.


INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE
OF DELAWARE


 


SERIES G CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK


 


THIS CERTIFIES THAT is the record holder of 
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF SERIES G CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK, $1.00 PAR VALUE, $50.00 STATED VALUE OF INERGETICS,
INC.  (the “Corporation”), transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by attorney upon surrender
of this certificate duly endorsed or assigned. This certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of the
State of Delaware, and to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”)
the Certificate of Designation of Rights, Preferences and Limitations of Series G Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Certificate
of Designation”) and the By-Laws of the Corporation, as now or hereafter amended, to all of which the holder of this certificate
by acceptance hereof, assents. THE SECURITIES EVIDENCED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT
OF 1933 (THE “ACT”) AND CANNOT BE SOLD OR OFFERED FOR SALE OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE ACT OR PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION THEREFROM, THE AVAILABILITY OF WHICH IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO THE
REASONABLE SATISFACTION OF THE CORPORATION. The shares represented by this certificate are convertible into share of Common
Stock of the Corporation in the manner as set forth in the Certificate of Designation. The powers, preferences, rights, limitations,
and restrictions of the Series G Convertible Preferred Stock are set forth in the Certificate of Designation which has been filed
with the Secretary of the State of Delaware, a copy of which is on file at the office of the Corporation. The Corporation shall
furnish without charge to the record holder of this certificate upon written request by such holder, copies of the Certificate
of Designation, the Certificate of Incorporation and the By-Laws, as well as the document or documents setting for the powers,
preference and rights of each of the other classes of the Corporation’s stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations
or restrictions of such preferences or such rights. This certificate is not valid unless signed by its respective officers as set
forth below.


 





 


	Dated: 	 	 	 


 





	 	 	 
	Michael C. James	 
	Chief Executive Officer 	 
	Chief Financial Officer
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT 
 TO 

LANTHEUS HOLDINGS, INC. 

2013 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

This AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) to that certain Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (formerly known as “Lantheus MI Holdings,
Inc.”) 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, as in effect from time to time (the “Plan”), is dated as of April 6, 2015. 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16 of the Plan, the Board desires to amend Section 4 of the Plan to increase the maximum
number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to Awards under the Plan; 
 NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby acknowledged and agreed that: 

1. Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used herein, but not otherwise defined herein, have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the
Plan. 
 2. Amendment. Section 4(a) of the Plan shall be, and is, hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

 “a. Basic Limitation. Subject to the following provisions of this Section 4 and Section 13, the maximum number of
Shares that may be issued pursuant to Awards under the Plan is 3,700,000 (three million seven hundred thousand) Shares. Shares may only be authorized but unissued Shares and may not be treasury Shares. Where an Award is granted in tandem, the number
of Shares charged against the Basic Limitation shall be the maximum number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to the Award.” 
 3.
Reference to and Effect on the Plan. Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect and otherwise unmodified. All references in the Plan to the “Plan” shall mean the Plan as amended hereby.

 4. Effectiveness. This Amendment is effective as of the date first written above.