alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Notice inviting applications for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block segment F17a of the Dutch continental shelf

(2004/C 263/03)

The Minister of Economic Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands serves notice that an application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons has been received for the segment of block F17 indicated on the map appended as Annex 3 to the Mining Regulation (Government Gazette 2002, 245), known as ‘block segment F17a’.

With reference to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons and the publication as described in Article 15 of the Mining Act (Bulleting of Acts and Decrees 2002, 542), the Minister of Economic Affairs invites interested parties to submit an application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons for block segment F17a.

Applications may be submitted for 13 weeks after publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union and should be sent to the Minister of Economic Affairs, for the attention of the Director of Energy Production, specifying ‘personal’, Princess Beatrixlaan 5-7, The Hague, The Netherlands. Applications submitted after this deadline will not be considered.

A decision on the applications will be taken not later than nine months after this period.

Further information can be requested by telephone ((31-70) 379 66 94).

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33547-33548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13125]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

Time and Date: 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, May 30, 2000.

Place:  Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: 1. Personnel actions (appointments, 
promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving 
individual Federal Reserve System employees.

[[Page 33548]]

    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: May 19, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-13125 Filed 5-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
EXHIBIT
      32.1






Statement
      Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The
      undersigned, Sherry Couturier, CFO of American International
      Industries, Inc., a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following certification
      as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect
      to
      the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ended
      September 30, 2007.






The
      undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
      information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all
      respects, the financial condition of American International Industries, Inc.
      and
      results of its operations.






Date:  November
      7, 2007


Sherry
      Couturier


CFO/s/
      Sherry Couturier
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 93 (Friday, May 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12017]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

Office of Federal Procurement Policy


Office of Federal Procurement Policy; Determination of Executive 
Compensation Benchmark Amount Pursuant to Section 808 of Pub. L. 105-
85.

AGENCY: Office of Federal Procurement Policy, OMB.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy 
(OFPP) is hereby publishing the attached memorandum to heads of 
agencies concerning the determination of the maximum ``benchmark'' 
compensation that will be allowable under government contracts during 
contractors' FY 2000--$353,010. This determination is required to be 
made pursuant to Section 808 of Public Law 105-85. It applies equally 
to both defense and civilian procurement agencies.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard C. Loeb, Executive Secretary, 
Cost Accounting Standards Board, OFPP on (202) 395-3254.

Deidre A. Lee,
Administrator.

To the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies

Subject: Determination of Executive Compensation Benchmark Amount 
Pursuant to Section 808 of Pub. L. 105-85

    This memorandum sets forth the ``benchmark compensation amount'' as 
required by Section 39 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy 
(OFPP) Act (41 U.S.C. 435), as amended. Under Section 39, the 
``benchmark compensation amount'' is ``the median amount of the 
compensation provided for all senior executives of all benchmark 
corporations for the most recent year for which data is available.'' 
The ``benchmark compensation amount'' established as directed by 
Section 39 limits the allowability of compensation costs under 
government contracts. The ``benchmark compensation amount'' does not 
limit the compensation that an executive may otherwise receive.
    Based on a review of commercially available surveys of executive 
compensation and after consultation with the Director of the Defense 
Contract Audit Agency, I have determined pursuant to the requirements 
of Section 39 that the benchmark compensation amount for contractor 
fiscal year 2000 is $353,010. This benchmark compensation amount is to 
be used for contractor fiscal year 2000, and subsequent contractor 
fiscal years, unless and until revised by OFPP. This benchmark 
compensation amount applies to contract costs incurred after January 1, 
2000, under covered contracts of both the defense and civilian 
procurement agencies as specified in Section 808 of Pub. L. 105-85.
    Questions concerning this memorandum may be addressed to Richard C. 
Loeb, Executive Secretary, Cost Accounting Standards Board, OFPP, on 
(202) 395-3254.

Deidre A. Lee,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 00-12017 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-P
#### § 32.50 Access to records.

Each recipient shall permit access and copying during normal business hours to its places of business, books, records and accounts pertinent to compliance with the Act, and all rules and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto for the purposes of investigation.
#### § 2702.2 Location of offices.

The Commission maintains its headquarters office at 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 520N, Washington, DC 20004-1710. The locations of other Commission offices may be obtained from the Commission's website (*http://www.fmshrc.gov*).
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


April 7, 2015


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, California Municipal Portfolio
of Closed-End Funds Trust, Series 2


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, California Municipal Portfolio of Closed-End Funds Trust, Series 2 set forth above
(the “Trust”). We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices
indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on April 6, 2015, in accordance with the valuation
method set forth in the Trust Indenture and Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party
performing the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-202183) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit
thereto.


 


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                             
	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	Vice President
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 24.1


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each director whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints John R. Varsames his or her true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and re-substitution,
to sign, individually, in the name on behalf of the undersigned in any and all
capacities stated below, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of eNote.com, Inc. for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 and any and all amendments thereto,
which amendments may make such changes in such Form 10-KSB as such
attorney-in-fact may deem appropriate, and to file the same with all exhibits
thereto and other documents in connection therewith with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting to such attorney-in-fact and agent, full power and
authority to do all such other acts and execute all such other documents as he
may deem necessary or desirable in connection with the foregoing, as fully as
the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that such attorney-in-fact and agent may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

         Signature                       Title                    Date
         ---------                       -----                    ----


<S>                                     <C>                   <C>
/s/ LEE ABRAHAM                         Director              March 31, 2000
----------------------------
Lee Abraham

/s/ STANLEY M. BLAU                     Director              March 27, 2000
----------------------------
Stanley M. Blau

/s/ JAMES BOWMAN                        Director              March 28, 2000
----------------------------
James Bowman, Ph.D.

/s/ CHARLES W. QUATT                    Director              March 31, 2000
----------------------------
Charles Quatt, Ph.D.

/s/ VICTOR REICHENSTEIN                 Director              March 29, 2000
----------------------------
Victor Reichenstein

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT      99.14**

**AMENDMENT      NO. 4 TO**

**LONGVIEW      FIBRE COMPANY**

**HOURLY      EMPLOYEES 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN**

**10.1**
**Participant      Loans Permitted**

|   | (c) | Legal                Maximum Limit.                The maximum a Participant may borrow, including the aggregate outstanding                balances of existing Plan loans, is 50% of his vested Account balance,                not                to exceed $50,000. However, the $50,000 maximum is reduced by the                Participant's highest aggregate outstanding Plan loan balance during                the                12-month period ending on the day before the date as of which the                loan is                processed. A defaulted loan that has been deemed distributed (including                interest accrued thereon, whether before or after such deemed                distribution), but that has not been repaid or offset against the                Participant's Account, shall be considered outstanding for purposes                of                determining the maximum amount of any subsequent loan to the Participant.                For purposes of this paragraph, the qualified plans of all Related                Companies shall be treated as though they are part of the Plan to                the                extent it would decrease the maximum loan                amount. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**10.6**
**Maximum      Number of Loans**

**10.9**
**Loan      Payment**

**10.11**
**Repayment      Suspension**
(78 South. 716)

#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

(8 Div. 529.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 16, 1918.)

1. Criminal Law &wkey;401 — Secondary Evidence-Collateral Matter.

Where a house had been fobbed and a ticket or order purporting to have been given to defendant was found in the house, contents of such order was collateral matter which could be shown by parol evidence without -accounting for the absence of the order.

2. Criminal Law <&wkey;104A-MATTEBS Reviewable — Saving Objections.

Though it appeared after a witness had testified as to the contents of a paper picked up at the scene of a robbery that he could not read, there was no available error, where no motion was made to exclude it.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Madison County; R. C. Brickell, Judge.

Walter Johnson was convicted of stealing from a house, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

Lanier & Pride, of Huntsville, for appellant. F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., and David W. W.' Fuller, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

BROWN, P. J.

[1] The state offered evidence showing that the state’s witness Underwood and his wife on returning to their home, from which they had been absent during the day, found that the house had been burglarized and some meat stolen therefrom. In the room where the meat was kept a *454twine string and a written order or ticket purporting to have been given to defendant, iWalter Johnson, for a pair of shoes, a hat, and a pair of pants were found. Over the objection of the defendant that the written order was the best evidence of its contents, the state was allowed to prove the contents hy parol testimony, without accounting for the absence of the written order. The contents of this order was not directly involved id the issues before the jury, but was collateral matter tending to connect the defendant with the offense, and the admission of parol evidence of its contents was not a violation of the best evidence rule. Winslow v. State, 76 Ala. 42; Bulger v. Ross, 98 Ala. 273, 12 South. 803; East v. Pace, 57 Ala. 521; Street v. Nelson, 67 Ala. 504; Foxworth v. Brown Bros., 120 Ala. 66, 24 South. 1; Rodgers v. Crook, 97 Ala. 722, 12 South. 108; Garrison v. Glass, 139 Ala. 512, 36 South. 725.

' [2] Both of the state’s witnesses, Underwood and his wife, testified to the contents of the order, and it was not until after this testimony had been admitted that it developed that Underwood could not read. After this fact was developed, no motion was made to exclude his evidence, and we assume that the defendant elected to -leave his case with the jury with this circumstance in his favor, rather than to have the evidence of the witness Underwood excluded. However this may be, the court cannot be put in error for admitting this testimony in the absence of a motion to exclude after the development of this infirmity.

We find no reversible error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
|EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                         OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer
of 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. (the Company), that the Annual Report of the
Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 16, 2007
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | By:/s/
Alfred R. Kahn     
Alfred R. Kahn      Chairman of the Board and      Chief Executive
Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: March 16, 2007
|--------------------

| | By:/s/
Bruce R. Foster     
Bruce R. Foster      Executive Vice President and      Chief Financial
Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. and will
be retained by 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The Consumer Advisory Council will meet on Thursday, June 22, 2000. The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will take place at the Federal Reserve Board's offices in Washington, DC., in Dining Room E of the Martin Building (Terrace level). The meeting will begin at 8:45 a.m. and is expected to conclude at 1 p.m. The Martin Building is located on C Street, Northwest, between 20th and 21st Streets. 

                    The Council's function is to advise the Board on the exercise of the Board's responsibilities under the Consumer Credit Protection Act and on other                           ( print page 33326)                        matters on which the Board seeks its advice. Time permitting, the Council will discuss the following topics:                

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act CRA Sunshine Regulation 

Discussion of the proposal regarding disclosure of CRA agreements between financial institutions and community groups. 

Credit Card Disclosures in Solicitations 

Discussion of the adequacy of existing disclosures and possible alternatives. 

Predatory Lending 

Discussion of issues regarding abusive lending practices. 

Committee Reports 

Council committees will report on their work.

Other matters previously considered by the Council or initiated by Council members also may be discussed. 

Persons wishing to submit views to the Council regarding any of the above topics may do so by sending written statements to Ann Bistay, Secretary of the Consumer Advisory Council, Division of Consumer and Community Affairs, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551. Information about this meeting may be obtained from Ms. Bistay, 202-452-6470. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) users may contact Diane Jenkins, 202-452-3544. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 17, 2000. 

Jennifer J. Johnson, 

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 00-12847 Filed 5-22-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit 32.1 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Triad Hospitals, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,James D. Shelton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ James D. Shelton

James D. Shelton 

Chief Executive Officer 

August 6, 2004 

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.