alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 155 (Thursday, August 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 49832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20424]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7554]


Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Warhol: The Headlines''

ACTION: Notice, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 7, 2011, notice was published on page 39974 of the 
Federal Register (Volume 76, No. 130) of determinations made by the 
Department of State pertaining to the exhibition, ``Warhol: The 
Headlines.'' The referenced notice is corrected to add one additional 
object to be included in the exhibition. Pursuant to the authority 
vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 
2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs 
Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 
U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 
1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as 
appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I 
hereby determine that the additional object to be included in the 
exhibition ``Warhol: The Headlines,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural 
significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with 
the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or 
display of the exhibit object at the National Gallery of Art, 
Washington, DC, from on or about September 25, 2011, until on or about 
January 2, 2012, at The Andy Warhol Museum, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 
from on or about October 14, 2012, until on or about January 6, 2013, 
and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, 
is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
description of the additional object, contact Paul W. Manning, 
Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

     Dated: August 4, 2011.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-20424 Filed 8-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
**Exhibit 32**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Louisville Gas and ElectricCompany and Kentucky Utilities Company (the “Companies”) on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned doeshereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’sknowledge,

 

1)   The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

2)   The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Companies as of the dates and forthe period expressed in the Report.

 

March 29, 2004

 

 
|   |   |                                | /s/  Victor A. Staffieri |   |   |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|   |   | Chairman of the Board, President    |                          |   |
|   |   | and Chief Executive Officer         |                          |   |
|   |   | Louisville Gas and Electric Company |                          |   |
|   |   | Kentucky Utilities Company          |                          |   |
|   |   |                                |                          |   |
|   |   |                                |                          |   |
|   |   |                                | /s/  S. Bradford Rives   |   |   |   |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer             |                          |   |
|   |   | Louisville Gas and Electric Company |                          |   |
|   |   | Kentucky Utilities Company          |                          |   |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as aseparate disclosure document.

 

1

----
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 48940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20135]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Environmental Impact Statement: Mendocino County, CA

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Rescind Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact 
Statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA, on behalf of the California Department of 
Transportation (Caltrans) is issuing this notice to advise the public 
that the Notice of Intent (NOI) published on September 5, 2002 Federal 
Register, (Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 172/Thursday, September 5, 
2002/Notices (56872) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 
for a proposed highway project on State Route 101 in Mendocino County 
is being rescinded.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra E. Rosas, Chief, Office of 
Environmental Management, Caltrans, 703 B Street, Marysville, CA 95901 
or call (530) 741-4017.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective July 1, 2007, the Federal Highway 
Administration (FHWA) assigned, and the California Department of 
Transportation (Caltrans) assumed, environmental responsibilities for 
this project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327. Caltrans, as the delegated 
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) agency, is rescinding the NOI 
to prepare an EIS for the Hopland Bypass Project in Mendocino County, 
California. The 8.8 mile project proposed to construct a four-lane 
freeway or expressway on State Route 101 in southern Mendocino County 
and bypass the community of Hopland. Since the NOI to prepare an EIS 
was published in the Federal Register on September 5, 2002, Caltrans 
conducted public involvement and agency coordination, developed a 
purpose and need for the project, and studied seven preliminary 
alternatives. The NOI is being rescinded due to a lack of funds being 
identified in this program type. Comments or questions concerning this 
proposed action should be directed to Caltrans at the address provided 
above.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing 
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on 
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)


    Issued on: August 3, 2011.
Cesar E. Perez,
Senior Transportation Engineer, Federal Highway Administration, 
Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2011-20135 Filed 8-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board). 

# DATE AND TIME:

The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on August 11, 2011, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dale L. Aultman, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056. 

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Parts of this meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are: 

## Open Session 

*A. Approval of Minutes*
    - July 14, 2011

*B. New Business*
    - Capital Adequacy—Ratings-Based Approach—Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

*C. Report*
    - Office of Management Services Quarterly Report

## Closed Session * 

### Reports 

    - Office of Secondary Mortgage Oversight Quarterly Report

* Session Closed-Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and (9). 

Dated: August 4, 2011.

Dale L. Aultman, 

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-20189 Filed 8-4-11; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0152

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DAVID JON KINDT,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 24, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 18 2020

07/20/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0152
#### Murray’s Administrator *vs*Baker.

*Oct.*14.

Error to the Trigg Circuit.

*Scire facias. Parties.*

The case stated.

It is erroneous to enter up a new judgment on a *sci. fa.*it should be ajudgment *that the plaintiff have execution*— and, —It is erroneous to enter a judgment on *asci.fa.*vs an administrator *in personam,*it should be to be levied of the assets in the hands of the administrator.

A *sci. fa.' to*revive a joint judgment against two or more defendants, should issue against all the defendants or their representatives or heirs, not against one.

Chief Justice Ewing

delivered the opinion of the Court.

At the November term, 1823, of the, Trigg Circuit Court, Baker recovered a judgment against Reynolds and Murray for $256 16 cents, with interest and costs. Reynolds and Murray both died, and a *scire facias*was sued but against the Administrator of Murray only, to revive the judgment and have execution. Upon this and another *scire facias*sued out to the county of Trigg, where the judgment was recovered, the Sheriff returned “not found;” whereupon judgment was rendered for the debt, interest, and costs, against the administrator of Munay, *in personam,*and that the plaintiff have execution, and the administrator has brought the case to this Court.

The judgment Is erroneous in two particulars, on its face: First, In the entry of anew judgment for the amount. It should have been that the plaintiff have execution only for the judgment mentioned in the *scire facías.*vSecond, It was erroneous to render judgment against the administrator, *in personam,*it should have been against him to be levied of the assets in his hands to be administered.'

But there.is a more radical defect .In the proceedings. According to the principles and within the reason, of the rules now settled by this Court, i't was erroneous- to sue out a *scirefacias*against the administrator of Murray alone. A joint *scire facias*should have been sued out against both the administrator of Murray and the administrator of Reynolds, and' if the latter had no administrator, and twelve months bad expired from his death, without the appointment of one, it should have been sued out against his heirs, in conjunction with the administrator of Murray, or his administrator and heirs, under the statute of 1819; (1 *Slat. Law,*780.) As it has been sued out against the administrator of Murray only, the, judgment is reversed *173and cause remanded, .that *the.scir.e facias*may be dismissed without prejudice to a joint proceeding as indicated.

*Cales Lindsey*for plaintiff: *Fry & Page*for defendant.
IIA 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 38 

Waiving certain provisions of the Trade Act of 1974 relating to the 

appointment of a Deputy United States Trade Representative. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2008 

Mr. GRASSLEY introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Waiving certain provisions of the Trade Act of 1974 relating 

to the appointment of a Deputy United States Trade 

Representative. 

Whereas paragraph (3) of section 141(b) of the Trade Act 

of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2171(b)(3)) provides certain limitations with respect to the appointment of the United 

States Trade Representative and Deputy United States 

Trade Representatives; 

Whereas Deanna Tanner Okun has provided significant public service to the United States; 

Whereas her years of public service include serving as an aide 

to a United States Senator with responsibility for international trade and foreign policy issues and, after appointment by the President and confirmation by the Senate, as a Commissioner on the independent United States 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•SJ 38 IS 

International Trade Commission, including serving as 

Chairman of the Commission; and 

Whereas it is appropriate to waive the provisions of paragraph (3) of section 141(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 

with respect to the appointment of Deanna Tanner Okun 

as Deputy United States Trade Representative: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (3) of 

4 section 141(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 

5 2171(b)(3)) or any other provision of law, the President, 

6 acting by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 

7 is authorized to appoint Deanna Tanner Okun as Deputy 

8 United States Trade Representative. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
§ 778.209 Method of inclusion of bonus in regular rate. ( a ) *General rules.* Where a bonus payment is considered a part of the regular rate at which an employee is employed, it must be included in computing his regular hourly rate of pay and overtime compensation. No difficulty arises in computing overtime compensation if the bonus covers only one weekly pay period. The amount of the bonus is merely added to the other earnings of the employee (except statutory exclusions) and the total divided by total hours worked. Under many bonus plans, however, calculations of the bonus may necessarily be deferred over a period of time longer than a workweek. In such a case the employer may disregard the bonus in computing the regular hourly rate until such time as the amount of the bonus can be ascertained. Until that is done he may pay compensation for overtime at one and one-half times the hourly rate paid by the employee, exclusive of the bonus. When the amount of the bonus can be ascertained, it must be apportioned back over the workweeks of the period during which it may be said to have been earned. The employee must then receive an additional amount of compensation for each workweek that he worked overtime during the period equal to one-half of the hourly rate of pay allocable to the bonus for that week multiplied by the number of statutory overtime hours worked during the week.
( b ) *Allocation of bonus where bonus earnings cannot be identified with particular workweeks.* If it is impossible to allocate the bonus among the workweeks of the period in proportion to the amount of the bonus actually earned each week, some other reasonable and equitable method of allocation must be adopted. For example, it may be reasonable and equitable to assume that the employee earned an equal amount of bonus each week of the period to which the bonus relates, and if the facts support this assumption additional compensation for each overtime week of the period may be computed and paid in an amount equal to one-half of the average hourly increase in pay resulting from bonus allocated to the week, multiplied by the number of statutory overtime hours worked in that week. Or, if there are facts which make it inappropriate to assume equal bonus earnings for each workweek, it may be reasonable and equitable to assume that the employee earned an equal amount of bonus each hour of the pay period and the resultant hourly increase may be determined by dividing the total bonus by the number of hours worked by the employee during the period for which it is paid. The additional compensation due for the overtime workweeks in the period may then be computed by multiplying the total number of statutory overtime hours worked in each such workweek during the period by one-half this hourly increase.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49510-49511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20255]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), as part of its 
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a 
preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and 
federal

[[Page 49511]]

agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing 
collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(A)]. This program helps to 
ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format, 
reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, 
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of 
collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. 
Currently, the NEA is soliciting comments concerning the proposed 
information collection on grant applicant satisfaction with application 
guidance and materials provided on the NEA Web site and by NEA staff. A 
copy of the current information collection request can be obtained by 
contacting the office listed below in the address section of this 
notice.

DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the 
address section below on or before October 8, 2011. The NEA is 
particularly interested in comments which:
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection of information including the validity 
of the methodology and assumptions used;
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
    <bullet> Minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate 
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting 
electronic submissions of responses.

ADDRESSES: Sunil Iyengar, National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 616, Washington, DC 20506-0001, 
telephone (202) 682-5424 (this is not a toll-free number), fax (202) 
682-5677.

Kathleen Edwards,
Director, Administrative Services, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2011-20255 Filed 8-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
----

----

III Bekendmakingen

Uitvoerend Agentschap voor intelligente energie

----

OPROEP TOT KANDIDAATSTELLING

(2004/C 205 A/01)

Het Uitvoerend Agentschap voor intelligente energie (IEEA) zoekt kandidaten om bepaalde functies te vervullen. Gedetailleerde informatie met betrekking tot deze functies, de opdrachten van het Agentschap en de te volgen procedure voor het indienen van een inschrijvingsformulier staan gepubliceerd op de internetsite van het IEEA op volgend adres: http://europa.eu.int/comm/energy/intelligent/index_en.html.

----
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 20 (Monday, January 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 5330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2005]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Lincoln County Resource Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Kootenai National 
Forest's Lincoln County Resource Advisory Committee will meet on 
Wednesday, February 15, 2011 at 6 p.m. at the Forest Supervisor's 
Office in Libby, Montana for a business meeting. The meeting is open to 
the public.

DATES: February 15, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Forest Supervisor's Office, 31374 U.S. Hwy 2, Libby, 
Montana.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janette Turk, Committee Coordinator, 
Kootenai National Forest at (406) 283-7764, or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94fee0e1e6ffd4f2e7baf2f1f0bae1e7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="375d4342455c77514419515253194244">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda will include community outreach for 
project proposals, grizzly bear DNA study update, and planning the 
spring field trip. If the meeting date or location is changed, notice 
will be posted in the local newspapers, including the Daily Interlake 
based in Kalispell, Montana.

    Dated: January 20, 2011.
Maggie Pittman,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011-2005 Filed 1-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>