p. 1


# OAR Box 

# 1875 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 14 ) ll-E-3 2 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 12/1/2008 11:12:44

AM Sheet 14 of 86

# r t P. 2 

## A-90-1 9 ll-E-3 2

MEETIN G NOTE S DATE : February13 , 199 2 PLACE : Durham , NC SUBJECT : Hazardou s Organi c NESHAP (HON ) Meetin g wit h Member s o f

th e Chemica l Manufacturer s Associatio n (CMA ) Attache d i s a summar yo f a 1-da

yinformationa l meetin g betwee n EPApersonne l an d member s o f CMA . A t thi s meeting , EP A describe d th e provision s i n th e 12/24/9 1 draf t HONan d answere d CM Aquestion s abou t th e draf t rulemaking package . Attachmen t 

# m& \<&- \P. 3 •4

MEETIN G SUMMAR

Y Thi s documen t summarize s th e meetin g wit h th e Chemica l Manufacturer s Associatio n (CMA ) hel d February13 , 1992 , a t th e Gues t Quarter s Hote l i n Durham , Nort h Carolina . I t i s organize d int o a questio n an

d answe r forma t an

d divide d int o seve n sections : Overvie wo f th e Regulation , Wastewater , Proces s Vents , Transfer , Storag e Tanks , Emission s Averaging , an d Suggestions . A lis t o f participant s i s i n Attachmen t A . Th e CM Abega n th e meetin g b yindicating tha t th e organizatio n i s currentl yi n th e stag e o f learning an d understandin g th e Hazardou s Organi c Nationa l Emissio n Standar d fo r Hazardou s Ai r Pollutant s (NESHAP) , commonl yreferre d t o a s th e HON , an

d appreciate d th e opportunit yt o mee t wit h th e Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y(EPA ) t o as k clarifyin g question s o n th e draf t regulation . Th e point s fo r discussio n wer e outline d i n th e meetin g agend a (Attachmen t B) . Th e CM Athe n indicate d tha t i t woul d no t b e makin g officia l comment s o n th e regulatio n a t th e meeting ; rather , i t wil l submi t comment s durin g th e publi c commen t perio d afte r proposa l o f th e regulation . Th e Emission s Standard s Divisio n (ESD ) director , Mr . Bruc e Jordan , welcome d th e CM Aan d indicate d tha t th e EPAals o appreciate d th e opportunit yt o answe r CMA' s question s o n th e draf t regulation . 1. 0 OVERVIE W O F TH E REGULATIO N Ms . Daphn e McMurre r o f th e Standard s Developmen t Branc h (SDB ) bega n th e EPApresentation s b ygiving a genera l introductio n t o th e regulatio n an d b yproviding a n overvie wo f Subpart s F , G , an

d H . Sh e indicate d tha t Subpar t F contain s th e applicabilit yan

d genera l requirements ; Subpar t G contain s th e provision s fo r proces s vents , storag e tanks , transfe r operations , wastewate r collectio n an d treatmen t operations , an d emission s averaging ; an

d Subpar t H contain s provision s fo r equipmen t leak s CHA3.MT G1P. 4 T 7

pe r th e Negotiate d Regulation . Ms . McMurre r als o wen t ove r specifi c area s i n which.th e EPAi s requesting publi c comment . Th e handout s fo r he r presentatio n ar e i n Attachmen t C . Ouestion s an

d Answer s o n Overvie w CM A - I n th e specifi c area s requiring publi c comment , wha t doe s th e term"complianc e gridlock " mean ? EP A - Som e CM

Arepresentative s hav e sai d facilitie s ma yhav e difficult ycomplyin g becaus e o f a gridloc k o f technology— demand fo r contro l equipmen t an d engineering service s mayb e highe r tha n th e supply . CM A - I n th e discussio n o f applicabilit yi n th e preamble , i t say s tha t SOCM I i s define d b ySI C 286 5 an

d 2869 . Doe s thi s mea n tha t onl yprocesse s wit h thes e SI C number s ar e considere d SOCM I processes ? EP A - Whethe r a proces s i s SOCM I i s determine d b yth e applicabilit ydefinitio n i n Subpar t F . Th e preambl e i s givin g a genera l guideline . I t i s possibl e tha t a proces s tha t i s no t i n on e o f thos e SI C code s mayb e considere d a SOCM I proces s fo r th e HON . Th e preambl e wil l b e reviewe d fo r clarit yan d changed , i f appropriate . CM A - Th e definitio n o f sourc e i s al l emissio n point s i n a contiguou s facility . Ho wdoe s th e definitio n relat e t o facilitie s wit h bot h SOCM I an d non-SOCM I processes ? EP A - I n thi s rule , th e sourc e include s onl ySOCM I processe s subjec t t o th e HON . CM A - I f a chemica l proces s produce s a SOCM I chemica l an d th e chemica l i s store d an d the n use d t o mak e a polyme r o r resin , wher e doe s HONapplicabilit yend ? EP A - I n suc h a case , Subpar t F define s th e poin t wher e a SOCM I proces s end s a s th e produc t storag e tank . Subpar t F als o specifie s tha t a SOCM I proces s end s wher e th e produc t enter s anothe r ai r oxidatio n o r reacto r proces s on-sit e o r i s transferre d off-site . CMA3.MT G2P. 5 >

CM A - I t i s no t clea r i n a situatio n wher e th e SOCM I produc t i s pipe d directl yint o a non-SOCM I proces s withou t a reacto r wher e HONapplicabilit yends . EP A - Thi s issu e wil l b e reviewe d an d clarified . CM A - Th e descriptio n o f batc h operation s o n pag e 301 , paragrap h (iii ) i s unclea r regarding applicability . EP A - Th e paragrap h i n questio n i s no t intende d t o expan d th e applicabilit yfo r batc h operations . Th e inten t i s fo r th e rul e t o appl yt o processe s producing chemical s liste d i n Tabl e 2 o f Subpar t F . Paragraph (iii) , discussin g batc h operations , wil l b e reviewe d an

d reworde d i f appropriate . CM A - Th e draf t regulatio n state s tha t HO Ndoe s no t appl yt o storag e o f liquid s tha t contai n HAP' s a s impurities , bu t CM A believe s th e storag e applicabilit yan d definitio n o f impurit yar e no t clea r enough . Fo r example , i f a SOCM I produc t ha s undergon e purification , an

d th e wast e contain s a smal l amoun t o f th e SOCM I chemical , i s th e storag e o f th e wast e covered ? EP A - Th e EPArequeste d tha t CM Aprovid e specifi c example s o f wher e applicabilit yi s unclear . Th e example s wil l receiv e revie w an d comment , an

d th e regulatorypackag e wil l b e edited , i f appropriate . CM

Aagree d t o provid e suc h examples . CM A - I f a compan

ylease s land , an

d supplie s utilitie s t o anothe r compan ytha t own s an

d operate s equipmen t i n th e middl e o f thei r facility , ar e thes e tw o facilitie s considere d th e same source ? EP A - Thi s situatio n wil l b e reviewed , th e regulatio n wil l b e mad e clearer , an

d a n answe r wil l b e forwarde d t o CMA . 2. 0 WASTEWATE R Ms . MaryTom

Kissel l o f SD B presente d th e wastewate r provision s unde r th e HON . Attachmen t D contain s th e summary slid e presentatio n an d informatio n provided . I n discussin g ne wuni t requirements , Ms . Kissel l pointe d ou t a mistak e tha t wa s mad e i n th e HONwastewate r guid e whic h ha d bee n distribute d t o some CM Amember s prio r t o thi s meeting . Th e CMA3.MTG3P . 6 V _ 4

mistak e wa s i n Figur e 4 o f th e guide . Th e wordin g "On e o r Mor e Grou p 1 Streams " shoul d read "On e Grou p 1 Stream. " I t wa s the n explaine d tha t fo r th e contro l o f Tabl e 8 HAP's , on e o f th e treatmen t option s i s t o reduc e eac h Tabl e 8 HA P t o les s tha n 1 0 ppmw . Sinc e dilutio n canno t b e use d t o achiev e compliance , onl yon e strea

m ca n b e considere d fo r tha t option . Ms . Kissel l the n distribute d revise d version s o f th e wastewate r guide . Th e discussio n o n HONwastewate r provision s continue d wit h Ms . Penn

yLassite r o f th e Chemical s an d Petroleu

mBranc h (CPB ) presentin g thre e cas e studies . Ms . Lassite r use d wastewate r strea mdat a an

d schemati c diagram s t o illustrat e alternative s tha t mayb e use d t o compl ywit h th e wastewate r provision s o f th e HON . He r handout s ar e i n Attachmen t E . Question s an

d Answer s o n Wastewate r CM A - Doe s a ne wuni t hav e t o b e controlle d fo r Tabl e 8 an d Tabl e 9 HAP's ? EP A - Ne wunit s mus t b e evaluate d fo r Tabl e 8 an d 9 HAP's . A wastewate r strea

m fro mth e uni t mus t b e controlle d i f i t exceed s th e applicabilit ycriteri a fo r eithe r Tabl e 8 o r 9 HAP's . CM A - Doe s th e 1 megagra mpe r yea r (Mg/yr ) facilit ytota l onl y includ e contribution s o f Grou p 1 wastewate r streams ? EP A - Yes , th e tota l onl yinclude s Grou p 1 wastewate r streams , whic h ar e no t controlle d t o th e leve l require d b yth e standard . CM A - Shoul d th e wordin g o n Figur e 5 stil l rea d "On e o r Mor e Grou p 1 Streams, " o r i s i t incorrec t lik e Figur e 4 ? EP A - Figur e 5 i s correct . CM A - Ca n th e concentratio n dat a fo r th e wastewate r stream s b e obtaine d fro

mEPAReferenc e Metho d 25 D o r anothe r validate d method . EP A - Yes , i f measurement s ar e taken , eithe r Metho d 25 D o r a metho d validate d b yMetho d 30 1 ca n b e use d t o determin e concentrations .

CMA3.MT GP. 7

CM A - Ho war e combine d SOCM I an d non-SOCM I wastewate r stream s considere d unde r th e rule ? EP A - Non-SOCM I stream s woul d b e considere d Grou p 2 streams , sinc e anything tha t wa s no t explicitl ydefine d a s a Grou p 1 strea mi s a Grou

p 2 stream . Fo r combine d SOCM I an d non-SOCM I streams , th e applicabl e treatmen t requirement s fo r combine d Grou p 1 an d Grou p 2 stream s woul d b e followed . [Although , fo r th e purpose s o f demonstrating compliance , th e non-SOCM I stream s ca n b e treate d i n th e same manne r a s Grou p 2 SOCM I streams , the y shoul d no t b e calle d Grou p 2 streams . Th e non-SOCM I wastewate r stream s woul d no t b e use d t o determin e th e source' s emissio n limi t an

d canno t b e include d i n an emissio n average. ] CM A - Wil l th e HO

Noverrid e th e benzen e wast e standar d i f a n existin g uni t ha d a strea mtha t containe d benzene , o r wil l complianc e wit h bot h regulation s b e necessary ? Also , woul d a benzene-containin g wastewate r stream , tha t i s belo wth e applicabilit yfo r th e benzen e regulation , b e covere d b yth e HON ? EP A - Afacilit ywil l hav e t o mee t an yapplicabl e standard s i n additio n t o th e HON , suc h a s th e benzen e NESHA P o r th e Resourc e Conservatio n an

d RecoveryAc t (RCRA ) rules . Th e HONcoul d appl y t o a benzene-containin g wastewate r strea m tha t i s belo wth e applicabilit yfo r th e benzen e NESHAP . I t seem s improbabl e tha t a strea mcontainin g onl ybenzen e woul d no t b e subjec t t o th e benzen e NESHA P requirements , bu t woul d requir e contro l becaus e o f HON . Th e EPAwoul d b e intereste d i n hearing abou t an yspecifi c case s wher e thi s situatio n coul d occur . CM A - Referrin g t o th e secon d example , Existing SOCM I Sourc e II , i n Ms . Lassiter' s cas e study , doe s th e loading cutof f o f 1 Mg/y r pertai n t o al l th e stream s fro ma proces s unit , including th e treate d streams ? EP A - Th e facilit yloading cutof f pertain s t o stream s withi n th e contiguou s area , unde r commo n ownershi p o r control . Stream s tha t

Thi s materia l wa s no t discusse d a t th e meeting . CMA3.MT GP. 8

ar e treate d i n accordanc e wit h th e variou s alternative s d o no t coun t towar d th e limit , no r d o Grou p 2 streams . CM A - Th e benzen e NESHA P specifie d a certai n percentag e o f wate r i n definin g th e ter m"aqueous. " Regardin g th e definitio n o f wastewate r unde r th e HON , doe s i t refe r t o a specifi c wate r conten t i n orde r t o b e aqueous ? EP A - Althoug h n o percentag e o f wate r i s specifie d i n th e HON , thes e wastewate r stream s ar e aqueou s b yvirtu e o f direc t o r indirec t contac t wit h water . I t maynee d t o b e clarifie d tha t non-aqueou s stream s ar e no t included . CM A - Ar e th e liquid s fro m auxiliaryequipmen t suc h a s hea t exchanger s an

d (glycol ) cooling system s covered ? Wha t i f th e equipmen t i s share d among variou s non-SOCM I an d SOCM I processes ? EP A - Unit s dedicate d an d integra l t o SOCM I processe s woul d likel yb e covered ; ther e i s some uncertaint yregardin g ho wunit s tie d t o bot h non-SOCM I an d SOCM I processe s woul d b e treated . Th e EPArequeste d tha t CM Asen d example s o f thi s occurrenc e s o tha t th e EPAca n furthe r investigat e thi s issue . CM A - Ar e al l concentratio n measurement s t o b e annua l average s o r maximu mvalues ? EP A - Reference s t o maximu m concentration s ar e incorrect ; concentration s ar e t o b e annua l averages . CM A - Giv e a shor t summarytha t provide s guidanc e o n th e quantit y o f dat a deeme d sufficien t b yth e EPAi n determinin g flo wrates , concentrations , etc . t o quantif ywastewate r strea m characteristic s a t th e poin t o f generation . Determinin g thes e parameter s woul d especiall yb e a problemwit h intermitten t wastewate r stream s generate d b ymaintenanc e operations . EP A - Ther e i s n o shor t summaryexplainin g thes e details ; however , i f th e annua l averag e value s o f a maintenanc e strea mar e no t greate r tha n either : (1 ) 10,00 0 part s pe r millio n b yweigh t (ppmw ) o f VOHAP' s an d (2 ) no t greate r tha n 50 0 ppm wo f VOHAP' s o r 1 lite r pe r minut e (1pm) , th e strea mwoul d no t b e covered . I n turn , thi s cutof f woul d eliminat e th e nee d fo r samplin g man yo f th e maintenanc e streams . CMA3.MTG6P. 9

CM A - I n regar d t o th e methodolog yfo r determinin g th e remova l o f volatil e organic s wit h biologica l treatmen t (bio-treatment ) systems , doe s th e credite d treatmen t hav e t o occu r entirel y withi n th e bio-treatmen t systemitself , o r ca n remova l fro m a tw o o r thre e step approach , including clarifiers , als o b e counted ? EP A - Treatmen t fro

m th e whol e system

i s considered , bu t complianc e wit h practice s suc h a s suppressing emission s fro mth e wastewate r (i.e. , covered , etc. ) unti l th e volatil e organi c HAP' s ar e treate d o r destroye d i s required . CM A - Wha t i s th e distinctio n betwee n collectio n an d treatmen t i n term s o f equipmen t an d location ? EP A - Aseparatio n o r distinctio n i s no t made . Sinc e thes e operation s ar e occurring withi n th e same overal l system , a distinctio n doe s no t appea r t o b e warranted . CM A - Doe s th e HO

Ndefinitio n o f wastewate r cove r spen t caustics ? Thi s issu e aros e unde r th e benzen e NESHA P sinc e suc h a strea m woul d contai n a verysmal l amoun t o f water . A n exampl e i s a causti c strea

mtha t strip s aci d gase s an d i s subsequentl ysen t t o a n ope n sewe r o f a SOCM I process . EP A - Th e inten t o f th e wastewate r definitio n wa s t o cove r stream s bein g sewered . I f th e spen t causti c i s no t discharge d t o th e sewer , the n i t i s no t subjec t t o th e rul e becaus e th e HO N addresse s wastewate r a s oppose d t o wastes . I f ther e i s a closed

loop recycl e o f th e causti c strea msuc h tha t i t doe s no t ge t mixe d wit h wate r o r expose d t o air , the n i t woul d likel yno t b e covere d withi n th e HON , sinc e thi s conditio n coul d b e considere d a s returning th e strea mt o th e process . Astrea mcontaining spen t causti c tha t i s discharge d t o th e sewe r woul d b e subjec t t o th e HON . Ther e ar e fundamenta l difference s betwee n th e HONan d th e benzen e NESHAP . An ysuggestion s o n clarifying th e definition s an

d applicabilit ywoul d b e appreciated . CM A - Wha t i s th e origi n o f th e 1 0 ppm wan d th e 0.0 2 1p

m level s cite d i n th e HON ?

CMA3.MT GP.1 0

EP A - Thes e level s reflec t th e benzen e NESHA P requirements , whic h wer e judge d t o represen t th e ne wsourc e MAC T floor , th e "bes t o f th e best " control . CM A - I s ther e a limitatio n o n recycle d stream s regardin g th e processe s t o whic h th e stream s coul d b e sent , simila r t o th e limitation s withi n th e benzen e NESHAP . Specifically , ca n recycle d stream s b e sen t t o processe s othe r tha n th e on e fro m whic h th e stream s originated , including non-SOCM I processes ? EP A - Th e stream s ca n g o bac k t o an yprocess , including non-SOCMI , a s long a s th e recycl e i s closed-loo p an d emission s ar e controlle d durin g recycle . CM A - Ar e calculation s fo r require d mas s removal , a s presen t i n Exampl e Calculatio n # 2 o f Ms . Lassiter' s cas e study , base d o n treatin g bot h Grou

p 1 an d Grou p 2 streams , o r ca n Grou p 2 stream s b e backe d ou t o f th e calculation ? EP A - I t ca n b e don e eithe r way . CM A - Regardin g th e earlie r presentatio n b yMs . Kissell , ho wd o th e number s o n th e flowdiagram s o n th e overhead s an d i n th e handout s correspond t o th e number s o n th e earlie r version s cite d i n th e regulatorypackage ? EP A - Th e ol d Figur e 1 ha s bee n divide d int o ne wFigure s 1 an d 2 ; al l othe r ol d figur e number s hav e consequentl yincrease d b yone . CM A - Wha t i s a ne wunit ? Wa s th e inten t t o cove r a ne wwas h dru mi n a n existin g process ? EP A - Th e inten t wa s no t t o cal l a ne wdru ma ne wsource , bu t t o cove r a ne wchemica l manufacturin g process . CM A - Ho wd o modification s o r reconstruction s influenc e whethe r processe s ar e considere d ne wo r existing ? EP A - Thes e determination s wil l b e define d unde r Sectio n 112(g ) rules . Th e HONjus t explain s wha t t o d o i n eac h o f thos e circumstances .

CMA3.MT GP.1 1

3. 0 PROCES S VENT S Ms . Sheil a Millike n o f SD B reviewe d th e majo r section s o f th e proces s ven t portio n o f th e HO Nregulatio n (applicability , monitoring , recordkeeping an d reporting , an

d tes t methods ) highlightin g th e similaritie s t o th e SOCM I NSP S fo r Proces s Vent s fro mAi r Oxidatio n Processe s an d Distillatio n Operations . Attache d i s th e handou t sh e wen t ove r (Attachmen t F) . Ouestion s an

d Answer s o n Proces s Vent s CM A- Th e k facto r o n pag e 36 7 an d th e b constan t fo r halogenate d stream s o n pag e 37 1 appea r t o b e a incorrect . Th e k facto r shoul d b e IO" 6 instead o f IO" 5
. EP A - Thes e wil l b e reviewe d an d correcte d i f necessary . CM A - I s ther e guidanc e o n th e condition s a t whic h th e performanc e tes t mus t b e run ? EP A - Guidanc e wil l b e i n th e Genera l Provision s t o Subpar t 63 . CM A - Regardin g th e calculatio n o f TRE , wha t vent s shoul d b e combined ? Woul d stream s tha t ar e alread ycontrolle d wit h combustio n t o 9 8 percen t b e included ? I f ther e ar e fiv e stream s i n a proces s uni t tha t hav e a combine d TR E les s tha n one , ca n thre e stream s b e controlle d an d th e othe r tw o no t controlle d i f th e tw o uncontrolle d stream s hav e a combine d TR E greate r tha n one ? EP A an dRadia n- Th e draf t HONpackag e require s tha t th e TR E b e calculate d fo r al l individua l ven t stream s i n a proces s uni t an d fo r al l possibl e combination s o f ven t stream s i n a proces s unit . Th e inten t o f combining stream s mus t b e furthe r discusse d t o develo p a n answe r fo r th e question s regarding whic h ven t stream s ar e require d t o b e combine d whe n calculating th e TRE . Th e answe r wil l b e forwarde d t o CMA . CM A - Wha t i s mean t b

ycombining streams ? EP A - Volume s o f ga s an d concentration s o f ga s i n th e ven t stream s ar e mathematicall ycombine d no t physically . CMA3.MT G9P.1 2

CM A - Ar e analyze r ga s stream s covere d b yth e proces s ven t provisions ? EP A - I t i s considere d a n equipmen t leak , an d therefor e no t covere d b

yth e proces s ven t provision s i n Subpar t G . However , whethe r analyze r ga s i s considere d a n equipmen t lea k subjec t t o Subpar t H o f th e HONwil l b e doubl e checked . CM A - I f change s i n condition s trigge r a ne wTR E calculatio n o r a performanc e test , d o al l th e vent s hav e t o b e reteste d o r jus t th e ven t tha t changed ? EP A - Onl yth e ven t tha t changed . CM A - Doe s th e rul e refe r t o 10 0 ppm vo f th e halogenate d materia l o r o f th e halogen ? EP A - Th e 10 0 ppm

v refer s t o th e su

mo f al l halogenate d compound s presen t i n th e stream . I f a scrubbe r i s applied , th e 99-percen t remova l o r 0. 5 mg/dsc m limi t refer s t o th e halogen s an d hydroge n halide s measurabl e b yMetho d 2 6 o r 26A . CM A - I s a pressur e vacuu mven t o n a storag e tank a proces s vent ? Th e inclusio n o f produc t accumulato r vessel s i n th e proces s ven t definitio n make s i t seem lik e i t woul d be . Ar e pressur e vacuu m vent s o n storag e tank s considere d equipmen t leaks ? EP A - Pressur e vacuu

m vent s o n tank s ar e no t intende d t o b e calle d proces s vents . W e hav e bee n reviewing ho wt o addres s potentia l overlap s betwee n proces s vents , storage , an d equipmen t leaks . Th e EPAwil l hav e t o ge t bac k t o CM Aan d mayfurthe r clarif yth e regulation . CM A - Th e regulatio n need s t o b e clarifie d a s t o whethe r upse t condition s ar e exemp t fro mtriggerin g a ne wperformanc e test . EP A - I n general , temporarymalfunction s woul d no t likel ytrigge r a ne wperformanc e test , onl ya significant , intentiona l proces s chang e woul d trigge r a retest . Th e EPAwil l conside r clarifyin g thi s i n eithe r th e Genera l Provision s o r th e HONregulation . CM A - I f TR E o r complianc e i s bein g determine d an d a recoveryo r combustio n contro l devic e i s present , doe s th e TR E o r complianc e demonstratio n hav e t o b e determine d a t th e maximu mexpecte d value s o f th e operating parameter s whic h hav e t o b e monitored ? CMA3.MTG1 0P.1 3

Also , wha t mus t b e don e i f a monitore d paramete r i s ou t o f range ? Doe s a ne wTR E o r complianc e determinatio n hav e t o b e conducted ? Ther e i s a concer n fo r situation s wher e th e maximu mexpecte d operating paramete r value s woul d no t occu r durin g th e 180-da y tim e perio d i n whic h industryha s t o demonstrat e compliance . Fo r example , th e temperatur e o f th e contro l devic e woul d b e hottes t i n August , bu t th e TR E tes t o r demonstratio n o f complianc e migh t nee d t o b e complete d i n th e winte r t o mee t th e regulatory schedule . EP A - ATR E determination.i s don e initiall yt o determin e whethe r a ven t i s Grou

p 1 o r Grou

p 2 . I f a Grou

p 2 ven t (TR

E >1 ) ha s a recoverydevice , the n recoverydevic e operating parameter s mus t b e monitored . I f th e monitore d value s ar e ou t o f th e rang e establishe d i n th e initia l TR E determination , thi s doe s no t i n itsel f constitut e a violatio n o f th e standar d o r mea n tha t TR E mus t b e reteste d o r th e ven t become s a Grou p 1 vent . However , i f th e operatin g paramete r value s ar e consistentl you t o f range , th e industryo r enforcemen t agenc ymaydecid e a ne wtes t shoul d b e conducted . Th e same ide a applie s t o monitorin g o f combustio n control s wher e monitorin g paramete r range s ar e establishe d durin g th e initia l performanc e tes t o f th e contro l device . Again , a monitorin g valu e bein g ou t o f rang e trigger s a n exces s emissio n report , bu t i s no t a violatio n o f th e standar d an d doe s no t necessaril ymea n th e performanc e tes t mus t b e redone . CM Aca n submi t informatio n o n wha t i s a reasonabl e tim e limi t withi n whic h representativ e condition s ca n b e obtaine d an d a complianc e tes t complete d an d submitted . CM A - Wha t i s th e basi s o f TRE , maximu mflo wo r averag e flow ? EP A an dRadian- Th e Genera l Provision s sa yrepresentativ e conditions . CM A- Th e draf t NESHA P Genera l Provision s sa ytest s shoul d b e run unde r whateve r condition s th e Administrato r agree s on . Mos t permittin g i s base d o n maximums , th e performanc e tes t shoul d b e base d o n maximum s too . I n Par t 60 , th e performanc e test s ar e CMA3.MT G 1 1P.1 4

. . M

als o ru n a t maximums , clarificatio n need s t o b e mad e i n th e Genera l Provisions . EP A - Ru n th e Performanc e tes t a t th e maximu mflowa t whic h th e proces s uni t i s expecte d t o operate , monito r wha t i s required , an d repor t i t i f i t goe s ou t o f range . I t i s expecte d th e NESHA P Genera l Provision s wil l b e simila r t o th e Par t 6 0 Genera l Provisions . CM A - I s ther e a n assumptio n i n th e rul e tha t TR E i s directl y relate d t o productio n capacity ? EP A - No , thi s assumptio n i s no t mad e i n th e rule . 4. 0 TRANSFE R Dr . Ja n Meye r o f SD B presente d a n overvie wo f th e transfe r provision s o f th e HON . Th e handou t i s attache d (Attachmen t G) . Ther e wa s a correctio n t o th e handou t mad e durin g th e presentation . O n th e pag e wit h th e heading "Grou p 1 Racks, " th e 10 0 ppmshoul d read 0. 5 mg/dscm . Ouestion s an

d Answer s o n Transfe r CM A - I s a rac k a n individua l loading arm ? EP A - No , a rac k ca n b e mad e u p o f severa l arms . I t i s a continuou s uni t wit h an ynumbe r o f arms . CM A - Th e ter

mmarin e vesse l i s define d bu t i s no t use d i n th e regulation . EP A - Th e packag e wil l b e checke d t o se e i f th e definitio n i s needed . I t seem s tha t th e termwa s presen t t o b e use d i n applicability . CM A - Th e definitio n o f Grou p 1 rac k shoul d sa

yannua l throughput . EP A - Tha t i s correct , w e wil l ad d annua l throughpu t t o th e definition . CM A - O n pag e 441 , th e emissio n rat e i s correcte d t o 3 percen t oxygen , no t al l contro l device s ru n a t thi s percen t oxygen . CMA3.MTG1 2P.1 5

EP A an dRadia n- Th e dat a ar e normalize d t o 3 percen t mathematically , th e strea mi s no t physicall yadjuste d t o 3 percent . CM A - Th e standar d cover s tank truck s an d railcars , ar e yo u intending t o exclud e packing tha t doe s no t hav e wheels , suc h a s drum s an

d isocontainers ? EP A - Yes , w e ar e intending t o exclud e th e mino r sources . CM A - Ca n Grou

p 1 rack s b e controlle d usin g vapo r balancing ? Vapo r balancin g woul d mak e sens e fro ma resourc e recovery/pollutio n preventio n vie wpoint . EP A - Vapo r balancin g can b e use d i f 9 8 percen t emissio n reductio n i s shown . Thi s mayb e difficul t t o show . CM A - CM Ai s concerne d tha t vapo r balancing i s no t par t o f th e rule . Ho wca n a performanc e tes t b e ru n o n vapo r balancing ? Vapo r balancin g system s woul d hav e n o emissio n point s excep t th e storag e tank s t o whic h th e vapo r i s returned , an d thes e emission s woul d b e covere d b

yth e storag e tank rule . EP A - W e wil l revie wth e possibilit yo f putting vapo r balancin g i n th e rule . CM A - I n th e preamble , page s 30 1 an d 302 , i t say s tha t combustio n i s th e universall yapplicabl e contro l devic e fo r transfer , i t shoul d b e vapo r balancing . EP A - Universall yapplicabl e i n SOCM I ma yno t b e wha t mos t facilitie s ar e doing . B y"universall yapplicable, " i t i s mean t tha t combustio n i s th e mos t stringen t technolog ytha t coul d b e applie d t o al l transfe r emissions . CM A - I n th e handout , wha t i s ppmc ? EP A - Part s pe r millio n b ycompoun

d (b yvolume) . CM A - I s ther e guidanc e i n th e rul e explaining ho wt o setu p th e performanc e tes t fo r a rac k wit h multipl e arms ? I f ther e ar e thre e compound s transferre d a t a rack , th e contro l devic e wil l reduc e th e emission s o f eac h b ydifferen t amount s du e t o difference s i n chemica l properties , ho wshoul d th e performanc e tes t b e run ?

CMA3.MTG1 3P.1 6

EP A - Th e performanc e test , whic h determine s th e efficienc yo f th e contro l devic e usin g th e inle t an d outle t concentration , mus t b e ru n a t representativ e conditions . I t i s no t possibl e t o stat e specificall ywha t i s mean t b yrepresentativ e condition s fo r al l cases . Afacilit ymus t determin e wha t representativ e condition s ar e appropriat e fo r th e typica l condition s see n b yth e contro l devic e an

d th e performanc e tes t run a t thes e conditions . CM A - I f severa l vent s fro mvariou s source s ar e route d t o on e incinerator , i s onl yon e performanc e tes t required ? EP A - Yes , th e performanc e tes t i s t o determin e whethe r th e contro l devic e i s functioning properly ; therefore , onl yon e tes t i s require d fo r on e contro l device . Ther e i s nothin g i n th e regulatio n tha t woul d requir e mor e tha n on e performanc e test . Thi s shoul d b e mad e obviou s i n th e supplementa l informatio n th e EPAplan s t o distribut e a t th e tim e o f proposal . CM A - I n th e provision s pag e 43 3 paragrap h (h) , i t say s tha t a collectio n systemcanno t b e operate d a t a pressur e greate r tha n th e vapo r tightnes s tes t pressure . Th e vapo r tightnes s tes t i s conducte d a t a pressur e les s tha n th e vapo r pressur e o f some o f th e chemicals , makin g i t impossibl e t o operat e th e collectio n systemwit h some chemicals . EP A - Yes , thi s i s incorrect ; i t wil l b e corrected . 5. 0 STORAG E
Dr . Ja n Meye r reviewe d th e Storag e Provisions . Sh e compare d an d contraste d th e provision s t o th e NSP S fo r VO L Storag e an d Benzen e Storage . Attache d i s th e handou t outlining th e presentatio n (Attachmen t H) . Ouestion s an

d Answer s o n Storag e CM A - I t i s difficul t fro ma n enforcemen t standpoin t t o kno wwhe n a sea l fail s i n a n interna l roof .

CMA3.MTG1 4P.1 7

EP A - Th e rul e clearl ystate s wha t constitute s a failure , suc h a s seal s tha t ar e tor n o r detached . Ther e wil l b e additiona l informatio n i n th e supplementa l information , givin g guidanc e t o th e States . An

ysuggestion s tha t CM Amayhav e o n ho wt o inspec t fo r sea l failure s i n interna l roof s shoul d b e sen t t o Ja n Meyer . CM A - Th e definitio n o f ne wversu s existing storag e vessel s depend s o n th e dat e o f publication . Whic h dat e o f publicatio n i s meant , promulgatio n o r proposal ? EP A - Th e definitio n o f ne wan d existing i s base d o n th e dat e o f proposal ; however , th e rul e doe s no t g o int o effec t unti l th e dat e o f promulgation . 6. 0 EMISSION S AVERAGIN G Ms . Daphn e McMurre r gav e a shor t presentatio n summarizing th e emission s averaging provisions . Th e handou t i s th e las t pag e o f th e firs t handou t (Attachmen t C) . Ouestion s an

d Answer s o n Emission s Averagin g CM A - I f th e referenc e contro l technolog yi s use d an

d achieve s a highe r percen t reduction , ca n thi s b e counte d a s a credit ? EP A - I f th e referenc e contro l technolog yi s bein g use d i n a differen t wayo r adjustment s hav e bee n mad e t o it , an d i f th e highe r percen t reductio n i s acknowledge d b yth e EPAthen , yes , i t ca n b e counte d a s a credit . CM A - Wha t i s a discoun t factor ? EP A - Th e discoun t factor , whic h wil l b e betwee n 0 an d 2 0 percent , shave s th e amoun t o f th e credi t b yth e amoun t o f th e factor . Therefore , a littl e mor e tha n on e Mg reductio n i s neede d t o generat e on e credi t an d t o balanc e on e debit . CM A - I f a pollutio n preventio n measur e wen t int o effec t las t year , ca n i t b e use d a s a credit ? EP A - Yes , pollutio n preventio n measure s tha t hav e gon e int o effec t afte r 198 7 ca n b e counte d a s credits . Th e onl yquestio n CMA3.MTG1 5P.1 8

i s ho wmuc h o f th e reductio n ca n b e counte d a s credits . Fo r instance , al l contro l o f a Grou p 1 poin t woul d no t b e counte d becaus e some contro l i s bein g require d b yth e HONrule . Onl y contro l beyond th e percen t contro l tha t woul d b e achieve d b y applying th e referenc e technolog yt o a Grou

p 1 emissio n poin t ca n b e credited . CM A - Wha t i s th e differenc e betwee n pollutio n preventio n an d add-o n controls ? EP A - T o qualif ya s pollutio n prevention , an ac t mus t resul t i n sourc e reductio n a s define d b yth e Pollutio n Preventio n Act . Th e differenc e betwee n pollutio n preventio n an d add-o n controls , i n term s o f credits , i s tha t credi t ca n b e give n fo r pollutio n preventio n i f i t wen t int o effec t sinc e 1987 ; credi t ca n onl yb e give n t o add-o n control s i f theyar e installe d afte r promulgatio n o r ar e par t o f a n Earl yReductio n commitment . CM A - Ar e stea

mstripping o f wastewate r an d interna l floating roof s (IFR ) o n storag e tank s considere d pollutio n preventio n o r add-o n controls ? I s a n IFR o n a Grou p 2 tank pollutio n preventio n o r add-o n control ? EP A - Thes e ar e stil l bein g considered ; an IFR o n a Grou p 2 tank wil l probabl yb e considere d pollutio n prevention . CM A - Ar e th e quarterl ycalculation s o f credit s an d debit s base d o n actua l o r allowabl e emissions ? EP A - Th e calculation s ar e base d o n actua l emissions . CM A - I f ther e i s a tank tha t i s bein g use d a s a credi t generator , bu t i t i s no t use d fo r 3 months , doe s i t generat e credit s fo r thos e 3 months ? EP A - I t doe s no t ge t counte d i f i t i s no t bein g used . CM A - Explai n th e 3-mont h rolling average . EP A - Monthl yestimate s ar e determine d an d the n 3-mont h average s ar e calculate d eac h month . Th e 3 month s t o b e average d ar e rolle d eac h mont h s o tha t th e averag e i s calculate d o n th e curren t mont h an

d th e tw o precedin g months . I n th e mont h o f March , th e 3-mont h averag e woul d includ e dat a fro mJanuary ,

CMA3.MT G1 6P.1 9

Februaryan

d March ; i n April , th e 3-mont h averag e woul d b e fo r February , March , an d April , etc . CM A - S o a bad mont h get s counte d fo r 3 rolling averages ? EP A - Yes , an

d a goo d mont h i s counte d fo r 3 rollin g averages . CM A - Can th e averaging b e wit h an ycombinatio n o f emissio n point s a t th e facilit yan d the n th e calculation s woul d onl yb e mad e fo r thes e points ? EP A - Yes , an

ycombinatio n o f point s tha t ar e subjec t t o th e HON . 7. 0 OTHE R SUGGESTION S AN D QUESTION S Th e EPAaske d i f ther e wer e an yadditiona l question s o r an y suggestions . CM A - I t woul d b e helpfu l i f th e ne wan d existing strea

mi n th e wastewate r provision s wer e writte n u p i n paralle l paragraphs . EP A - Everythin g abou t ne wstream s unde r on e se t o f paragrap h an d everything regarding existing stream s unde r anothe r se t o f paragraphs ? CM A - Yes . CM A - Th e implementatio n o f th e rul e i s verycomplicate d an d time consuming . On e hundre d an d twent yday s mayno t b e enough time t o prepar e th e implementatio n document . Also , wit h th e implementatio n pla n bein g tie d t o th e operating permit , i t i s verydifficul t t o chang e th e implementatio n plan . Asourc e woul d hav e t o g o through al l o f th e permi t revie wprocedure s t o chang e th e implementatio n plan . EP A - Th e implementatio n pla n wa s tie d t o th e operating permi t becaus e simila r informatio n i s i n bot h documents . Th e permi t progra mha s t o b e finalize d t o full yunderstand th e implication s o f thi s requirement . T o ensur e enforceability , th e Agenc ywoul d lik e t o hav e th e implementatio n pla n submitte d a s soo n a s possible . Th e tim e requiremen t wil l b e reviewed . CM A - I n Tabl e 3 o n pag e 329 , th e footnot e regarding organi c cyanide s i s technicall yincorrec t an d i s no t necessary . EP A - W e wil l remov e tha t footnote . CMA3.MTG1 7P.2 0

CM A - I s th e HONbein g affecte d b yPresiden t Bush' s 90-da y moratoriu

mo n regulations ? EP A - Regulation s whic h hav e a statutorydeadlin e ar e no t affected . Sinc e th e HONha s a statutorydeadline , ES D staf f believe s i t wil l no t b e affected . Thi s i s no t a n officia l decision . CM A - Th e recordkeepin g an d reportin g requirement s ar e ver y complicated , wh

yd o the yhav e t o b e i n th e regulatio n i n November ? Th e monitorin g provision s coul d b e complete d b y November , whil e th e recordkeepin g an d reportin g provision s coul d b e propose d an

d promulgate d afte r the yar e reworked . EP A - Froma n enforcemen t perspective , i t woul d b e difficul t t o publis h th e regulatio n withou t th e recordkeepin g an d reportin g provisions . Wha t specificall yi s th e proble mwit h recordkeepin g an d reporting ? CM A - I t i s a goo d ide a fo r u s t o tal k furthe r wit h th e EPAabou t reportin g an

d recordkeepin g becaus e ther e ma yb e som e dat a tha t ar e verydifficul t fo r u s t o provid e an d tha t ma yno t b e necessaryfroma n enforcemen t poin t o f view . EP A - Muc h o f th e complicatio n come s fro mth e regulation s bein g flexible ; w e als o nee d feedbac k o n thos e aspect s o f th e rul e i n whic h th e flexibilit yi s no t needed , o r i s les s important . CM A - Ther e wa s a n earlie r questio n regardin g modification s triggerin g a repea t o f th e performanc e test . I t wa s clarifie d tha t onl ysignifican t intentiona l change s woul d trigge r a retest . Ca n word s b e adde d t o th e regulatio n t o reflec t this ? EP A - I t woul d b e helpfu l fo r CM At o provid e a summaryo f thes e area s o f concern . CM A - Ar e dryer s o r thi n fil mevaporator s considere d distillatio n columns ? EP A - Th e definitio n o f "distillatio n operation " i s verybroa d an d woul d includ e an

yseparatio n tha t i s achieve d b y redistributio n o f th e component s betwee n th e liquid

- an d vapor phase s a s the yapproac h equilibriu mwithi n th e unit . Thin-fil m evaporator s woul d b e include d unde r thi s definition . Becaus e CMA3.MT G 1 8————— a P.2 1

dryer s d o no t generall ycontai n a liqui d phase , the yar e no t expecte d t o com e unde r th e distillatio n operatio n definition . CM A - Doe s th e regulatio n cove r th e storag e o f distillatio n bottoms ? EP A - Thi s i s a wast e an d i s no t intende d t o b e covere d i n thi s regulation . Mr . Jorda n thanke d everyon e fo r coming an d aske d th e participant s t o sen d an yadditiona l comment s o r question s t o th e EPA . H e expresse d hi s desir e tha t th e cooperativ e workin g relationshi p betwee n th e EPAan

d CM Acontinue .

CMA3.MT G1 9P.2 2

ATTACHMEN

T AP.2 3

EPA- CM

A HONCLARIFICATIO

NDISCUSSIO

N

Nam e Davi d Emerso n Ala n T . Ro y To mStar k Davi d DiMarcell o Denni s E . Mille r Ji mLewi s Davi d Woodrin g Nanc yCookso n AmyMeyer s Gar yO'De a Richar d Sigma n Annett e Stanle y Sony a Winne r Davi d Gustafso n Stev e Coppol a Joh n Deg e Pau l Jan n To mKittlema n Vivia n Mclntir e Jo e Woolber t Denni s Beauregar d Michel e Dubo w Lind a Herrin g Bruc e Jorda n Mar yTo m

Kissel l Penn yLassite r Affiliatio n Ai r Product s an d Chemical s Allied-Signa l Amoc o Chemica l BAS F BAS F B.F . Goodric h B.P . Chemica l CMA CMA CMA CMA CMA Covingto n & Burlin g Do w DuPon t DuPon t DuPon t DuPon t Eastma n Chemica l Eastma n Chemica l EPA , TS D EPA , ES D EPA , ES D EPA , ES D EPA , ES D EPA , ES D Telephon e Numbe r 215-481-834 7 804-530-6155 312-856-281 3 201-397-459 1 201-316-380 9 216-447-797 9 216-586-867 0 202-887-124 1 202-887-137 0 202-887-135 3 202-887-131 3 202-887-110 3 202-662-557 2 517-636-295 3 302-773-014 9 302-773-422 9 302-366-321 9 302-366-471 8 615-229-304 5 903-237-5475 919-541-551 2 919-541-380 3 919-541-535 8 919-541-557 2 919-541-451 6 919-541-539 6

MCH/08 2 affil.ls tNam e

Daphn e McMurre r Ja n Meye r Sheil a Millike n Bo b Rosenstee l Debbi e Stackhous e Ki mBoudreau x Gordo n Brow n Bria n Tarant o Dann yAnderso n Raymon d Rude k Bruc e Wallingto n J . Scot t Hartma n Jef f Kliev e Chuc k Malloc h Conni e J . Keatin g Lloy d Ston e Laszl o Takac s Jef f Elliot t Gu yE . Fortie r Rut h Mea d Juli e Ann e Prober t Ma e Thoma s Pa t Mora n Jac k McClur e Kevi n P . Bat t Jo e Hoviou s Jo e Ledvin a Davi d E . Davi s Affiliatio n EPA , ES D EPA , ES D EPA , ES D EPA , ES D EPA , ES D Ethy l Corporatio n Exxo n Chemica l Exxo n Chemica l Firs t Chemica l Merc k Merc k Miles , Inc . Monsant o Monsant o OxyChe m OxyChe m OxyChe m Radia n Corporatio n Radia n Corporatio n Radia n Corporatio n Radia n Corporatio n Radia n Corporatio n Rohman d Haa s KY , Inc . Shel l Oi l Compan y Unio n Carbid e Unio n Carbid e Vist a Chemica l Vulca n Chemical s Telephon e Numbe r 919-541-024 8 919-541-525 4 919-541-262 5 919-541-560 8 919-541-525 8 504-388-777 6 713-425-503 3 713-870-611 7 601-938-222 7 908-302-739 7 908-302-781 5 412-777-764 7 314-694-371 2 314-694-888 9 713-474-044 2 713-393-555 6 716-286-310 3 919-541-910 0 919-541-910 0 919-541-910 0 919-541-910 0 919-541-910 0 502-449-525 8 713-241-399 9 304-747-471 8 203-794-518 3 713-588-344 6 205-877-385 4

MCH/08 2 affil.ls t-l-"5 < " "=-J_ aMiT , CHEM
. MfiMJFACTURER S ASSN
. T

O 

# cat *
CNgMCAI
. MANUFACTURER S ASSOCIATIO N

Januar y 24 , 1.9 2
Tentativ e Agend

a HO N neetln g between SP

A an d CM A
9:4 5 - 10:3 9 Introductio n an d Overvie

w 10:3 0 - 12:0 0 Vastevate r 1Z:0 0 - l:o o Lunc

h 1:00-2:0 0 oces s Vents z:0 0 - 2:3 0 Transfe rOperation s 2--3 0 - 3:o o storag e Tank s 3:0 0 - 3:3 0 Eaission s Averagin g 3:3 0 - 4:0 0 Wra

p - Op

cc : K . Baile y N. Cookso

n T . Croswel l B . Hora a 0 . O'De a A . Stanle y

?30iM S ^,^.w a 8 « ^ T6aDC2003 r JOMK^O O TetexB9ei7(CMAVVSH ) 91315541402 8 FP.2 !

___ ^ ^ >

TOTA

LP.0 2 P.25P.2 6



### HO N Regulator y Packag e Subpar t F : Applicability an dGenera l Requirements

° Specifie s covere dpollutant s an dsource s Define s SOCM I

° Define s 7 non-SOCM I Processe s fo r th e Equipmen t

Leak s standar d Subpar t G : Provision s for

Proces s Vents , Storag e Vessels , Transfe r Operation s an dWastewate r SOCM I onl y

° Contro l requirement s

° Emission s averagin g Subpar t H : Provision s for

Equipmen t

Leak s 0 

### Regulatory negotiatio n 0 

### Wor k

practic e standar dP.2 7



## Subpar tF Specifies covered pollutant s and source s Organi c HAP

s 11 0 HAP s regulated by Subpar

tG 149 HAP s regulated by Subpar

tH Majo r source s only , includin g thos e create dby Lesse r Quantity Cutoff

s Define s SOCM I 39 9 chemical manufacturin g processe s fo r Subpar t G , 45 3 for Subpar t H Proces s Vents , Storag e Vessels , Transfe r Operations , Wastewate r

Collectio n Treatmen t

Operation s an d Equipmen t

Leak s Sourc e define da s all emissio n point s inacontiguou s are a unde r commo ncontro l Define s 7 non-SOCM I Processe s for Equipmen t

Leak s standar d Styrene/butadien e rubbe r productio n Polybutadien e productio n Chlorin e productio n Pesticid e productio n Chlorinate dhydrocarbo nus e Pharmaceutica l productio n Miscellaneou s butadien e us e

## Subpar tG SOCM I Sourc e Categor y Only , excluding equipmentleaks Control Requirement

s Referenc e Control Technology (RCT) 0 

### Mor

e than on e devic e o rpractice can b e th e RC T 0 

### Mostwidely applicabl e control s 0 

### Simila

r control , monitoring , recordkeepin g an d reporting requirement

s in existin g rule s Applicabilit

y Criteri afo rControl Requirement s

° Interact

s wit h RC T to determine th e overal l control leve l fro msourc e 0 

### Compare dt o th e "Floo r level s o f control " for

eac h kin do f emissio npoin t 0 

### Usedt o defin e Grou p 1 an dGrou p 2 point s Emission s Averagin g Allow s flexibilit

y whil e achievin g equal o r greate r emissio nreduction sP.2 9



## Subpar tH Regulator y Negotiation Finishe dinNovember

199 0 Representatives from :

° Petroleum , Chemica l and Pharmaceutica

l industrie s 0 

### Stat e an dlocal agencie s

° Environmenta l group s Agree dt o exclud e Petroleu mRefinery processe s Wor k practic e standar d Base donpre-existin g equipmen t lea k standar d Canno t b e assigne dacontro l efficienc y tha t woul db e consisten t acros s source s o r

acros s tim e for

agivensourc e Allow s staggere dimplementatio n Include s incentive s fo r

goo dperformanc e If asourc e want s t o includ e Equipmen t Leak s init s enforceabl e commitmen t

for th e Earl y Reduction s rule , th e commitmen t mus t b e filedbefore proposa l of th e HO NP.3 0



### Request s forPubli cCommen t

0 

### Us e o f

aDiscountFactorforEmission s Averagin g
0 

### Proposed exclusion fo rareasource s and pilotplant s

° Definitio n o f

SOCM I used t o determin e applicabilit y
0 

### Tes tmethods forprocess vent s
0 

### Need and potentia

l way s to addres s compliance gridloc k Way s t o ensur e complianc e wit hemission s averagin g prio r t o issuanc e o

f operatin g permit s
Remainin g Issue s Consistency wit

h CTG s an

d RAC T polic

y InterpollutantAveragin gP.3 1



## Emissions Averagin g Control requirement

s used t o predict"allowable emissions " Hypothetically apply th e RC T to Group 1 points , predict post-contro l emission s Predictemissions from Group 2 points wit h baselin e control s Systemo f credit s an ddebit s use dt o balanc e emission s fro m point s tha t

ar e average d Debit s fo r"unde

rcontrol " of

aGroup 1 point Credit s for :

° Ne w control s abov e th e RC T level o naGrou p 1 point 0 

### Ne w control s o naGrou p 2 poin t

° Pollutio npreventio nmeasure s take nsinc e 198 7

° Appropriat e Earl y Reduction s control s Discountin g facto r

applie dt o credi t

generatin g point s Credit s an dDebit s mus t

balanc e I nM g O naquarterl y basi sP.3 2

ATTACHMEN

T D

# HAZARDOU S ORGANI C NESHA P(HON )

CM A Meetin g 1 3 Februar

y 1992

### Benzen e an dHO N Wastewate r —A Compariso n Overvie w

Wast e stream s Subjec t t o Standar d Basi s o f Contro l Treatmen t Requirement s

Affecte dWast e Managemen t

Unit s BENZEN E

• al l benzen e containin g waste s

• facility threshol dfo r

contro l an d strea mthreshol d

• treatmen t

alternatives : •reduc e benzen e concentratio nt o belo w 1 0 ppm w •remov e 99 % o f

benzen e o na mas s basi s •trea t i nincinerato r

operatin e at 99 % efficienc y •trea t i nwastewate r

treatmen t syste m

• tank s • surfac e impoundment s • oil-wate r

separator s • container s • individua l drai n system s HO NWASTEWATE R

• wastewate r

stream s

• individua l strea mthreshold *
•treatmen t

alternatives : •recycl e t o proces s •trea t withdesig nstea m strippe r • reduc e pollutan t concentratio nt o numerica l standar d •reduc e mas s flo w rat e b y specifie dpercentage s

• tank s • surfac e impoundment s • oil-wate r

separator s • container s • individua l drai nsystem s

* wit h exemptio nN o Grou p 2 W WStrea m

Treatmen t an d Control s t o Mee t Ne wan d Existin g Treatmen t Standard s Treatmen t an d Control s t o Mee t Existin g Treatmen t Standard s 

# Figur e 8
. HO N Wastewate rOperation sP.3 6



### WHA T I S A WASTEWATE RSTREAM ?

An y organicHAP-containing liqui d o rmateria l separated fro

m th e liqui d (i.e. , residual) resulting fro m direc torindirec

tcontac tof water wit h organiccompound

s Wastewaterstream

s are classified as Grou

p 1 orGrou

p 2 based o n a concentration an

d flo wcriteri a Example s o f wastewate

rstreams are :

• process wastewate

r •produc torfee

d tan kdrawdow

n • leachat e landfil l •coolin g towerblowdow

n •stea m tra

p condensat

e •materia l recovere

d fro m wast e managemen

tunit s



### WHA T I S POIN T O F GENERATION ?
Forwastewater(exceptlandfill leachate)

• wher e wastewaterstrea

m exit s th e process unitorstorage tan kpriort o handling ortreatmen

tin apiece of

equipmen

tno tintegra l t o th e operation o f th e process uni

t

Forlandfil

l leachate : •A tth e pum p wel l wher e th e leachat

e is remove

d fro m th e landfil

lP.3 7



### WHIC H STREAM

S AR E GROU P1 WASTEWATE

RSTREAM

S FORCONTRO

L O F TABL E 8 HAP'S ?

• Streams generated fro m ne w process units are Group 1 wastewaterstreams required t o control forTable 8 HAP' s when :

• Flow rat e > 0.0 2 fpm , AN D • concentration of

any Tabl e 8 HAP> 1 0 ppm w



### WHIC H STREAM

S AR E GROU P1 WASTEWATE

RSTREAM

S FO RCONTRO

L O F TABL E 9 HAP'S ?

• Stream s ar e Grou p 1 wastewater stream s fo r

contro l o f Tabl e 9 HAP' s when :

• tota l VOHA Pconcentratio n> 10,00 0 ppmw

O R • tota l VOHA Pconcentratio n> 500 ppmw an d flo w rat e > 1 t

pm

• a nexistin g proces s uni t wastewater

strea mi s exemp t

fromtreatmen t requirement s i

f sourc e tota l VOHAPmas s < 1 Mg/y rP.3 8

New Units 

### WHA T AR

E TH E TREATMEN T REQUIREMENT S FO RGROUP1 WW STREAM S REQUIRIN G CONTRO L O F TABL E 8 HAP'S ?

• Whentreatin g on e Grou p 1 wastewater strea mfo r

contro l o f Tabl e 8 HAP's , th e owner/operato r i s require dto :

• recycl e t o aproces s

o r • trea t wit hadesig nsteamstrippe r o r • reduc e eac hTabl e 8 HA Pt o les s than 1 0 ppm w

New Units 

### WHA T ARE TH E TREATMEN T REQUIREMENT S FO RGROUP1 W W STREAM S REQUIRIN G CONTRO L O F TABL E 8 HAP'S ?

• Whentreatin g on e o r

more Grou p 1 an dGrou p 2 wastewate r stream s for contro l o f Tabl e 8 HAP'S , th e owner/operato r i s require dto :

• recycl e t o aproces s

o r • trea t wit hadesig nstea

mstrippe r o r • reduc e combine dmas s flo w rat e o f Tabl e 8 compound s by 99 % o r • achiev e require dmas s remova l o f tota l VOHAP' sP.3 9

Existing and

New Units 

### WHA T AR E TH E TREATMEN

T REQUIREMENT

S FORGROU

P1 W W STREAM

S REQUIRIN

G CONTRO

L O F TABL E 9 HAP'S ?

• Whe ntreatin g on e o r

mor e Grou p 1 wastewater stream s fo r

th e contro l o

f Tabl e 9 HAP's , th e owner/operato r i s require dto :

• recycl e t o th e proces s

o r • trea t wit hadesig nsteamstrippe r o r • reduc e tota l VOHAPmas s flo w rat e by 99 % o r • reduc e tota l VOHA Pmas s flow rat e fo r eac hgrou p o

f HAP' s i n accordanc e wit

hTabl e 9 o r • reduc e tota l VOHA Paverag e concentratio nt o no mor e tha n5 0 ppm w Existing and

New Units 

### WHA T AR E TH E TREATMEN

T REQUIREMENT

S FORGROU

P1 W W STREAM

S REQUIRIN

G CONTRO

L O F TABL E 9 HAP'S ?

• Whe ntreatin g on e o r

mor e Grou p 1 and/o r

Grou p 2 wastewate r

stream s fo r th e contro l o

f Tabl e 9 HAP's , th e owner/operato r i s require dto :

• recycl e t o th e proces s

o r • trea t wit hadesig nsteamstrippe r o r • reduc e tota l VOHAPmas s flo w rat e by at

leas t 99 % o r • reduc e tota l VOHAPmas s flo w rat e for

eachgrou p o

f HAP' s in accordanc e wit

hTabl e 9 o r • achiev e require dmas s removal for Grou p 1 wastewate r

stream s -»

• -

Existing and

New Units 

### WHE N CA N TH E PROCES S UNI T ALTERNATIVE TREATMEN T

REQUIREMENT S B E IMPI_EMENTED ?

• Th e Proces s Uni t

Alternativ e Treatmen t

Provision s ma

y b e chosenb y th e owner/operato r

a s atreatmen t

alternativ e if

:

• controUing for

Tabl e 9 HAP' s an d • wastewater

stream s generate dwithi nth e proces s uni t ar e no t mixe d wit hstream s fromothe r

unit s an d • al l wastewater

stream s generate dwithi nth e uni t comply wit

hth e treatmen t provision s

Existing and

New Units 

### WHA T ARE TH

E PROCES S UNI T ALTERNATIVE TREATMEN T REQUIREMENTS ?

• Wastewate r

stream s wit

hconcentrations < 1 0 ppm w d o no t requir e treatmen t

• Whe ntreatin g wastewater stream s wit

hconcentration s > 1 0 ppmw , th e owner/operato r

i s require dto :

• recycl e t o aproces s

o r • reduc e tota l VOHAPconcentratio nt o les s tha n1 0 ppm

w P.4 0P.4 1



# Ne wSOCM I Sourc e

SOCM I Process Uni t A Maximu m Tabl e S HA P = 30 0 ppm w



## Strea m A- 1 35 0 ppmwVOHAP , 1 0 Ip m

* Maximu m Tabl e B HA P = 3 ppm w Strea m A- 2 e05ppmwVOHAP,3lp m



## SOCM I Process Unit B Maximu m Tabl e 8 HA P = 10 0 ppm w Strea m B- 1 700ppmwVOHAP,20lp m

Maximu m Tabl e 8 HA P = 5 ppm w Strea m B- 2 40 0 ppm wVOHAP
. 3 0 Ip m

* Grou p 1 stream : becaus e either :

- Concentratio n o

f a Tabl e 8 HA P > 1 0 ppm wan d flo w> 0.0 2 Ipm , o r

- Concentratio n of VOHA P > 50 0 ppm wan d flo w> 1 Ip m o r

- Concentratio n of VOHA P > 10,00 0 ppmw .P.4 2



### NE WSOURC E Exampl e Trea t Strea m A- 1 individually :

•Trea t eac h Tabl e 8 HA P t o < 1 0 ppm w o r •Recycl e t o proces s o r •Trea t strea m wit h desig n stea m strippe r

Trea t Combine d Stream s A- 2 an d B- 1

•Recycl e t o proces s o r •Trea t wit h desig n stea m strippe r o r •Trea t eac h Tabl e 8 HA P t o achiev e 99 % mas s

reduction , an d either i . 99 % reductio n i n tota l VOHA P mas s flo w rat e ii . Tota l VOHA P concentratio n o f < 5 0 ppm w iii . Percen t reduction s i n mas s flo wrat e fo r eac h grou p o f HAP' s i n Tabl e 9P.4 3



# Existin g SOCM I Source I I

SOCM I Sourc e Proces s Uni t A Strea m A- 1 3 0 Ipm , 22 5 ppm wVOHAP , 3. 5 Mg/y r Strea m A- 2 * 11. 5 Ipm . 55 0 ppm wVOHAP , 3, 3 Mg/y r Strea m A- 3 * 1 2 Ipm , 58 0 ppm wVOHAP , 3.6 C Mg/y r Strea m A- 4 * 0. 5 Ipm , 10,00 0 ppm wVOHAP , 2.6 3 Mg/y r 11. 5 Ipm , 5 ppm w 99 % contro l

12. 5 Ipm , 15 1 ppmw , 0.9 8 Mg/y r 84 % corrtro l
Grou p 1 stream s because thei r VOHA P concentratio n > 50 0 ppm wan d flowrate > 1 Ipm , o r VOHA P concentratio n > 10,00 0 ppmw .P.4 4



### EXISTIN G SOCM I SOURC E I I

EXAMPL E O F FACILIT YLOADIN G CUTOF F Strea m A- 2 Trea t b y desig n stea m strippe r
Stream s A- 3 an d A- 4 Trea t t o get belowfacilit y loadin g o f 1 Mg/yr .
NOTE : Onl y Grou p 1 stream s no t treate d t o th e level s require d i n th e standar d ar e include d i n thi s analysis .Legen d Undwyroun d

GROU P 1-W < strom a - #



### EXAMPL E WASTEWATE R COLLECTIO N & TREATMEN TSYSTE M

EXISTIN G SOCM I SOURC EP.4 6



### EXISTIN G SOURC E

EXAMPL E TREATMEN TOPTION S DEFIN E EXAMPL E Trea t Strea m A- 1 individuall y Trea t Stream s A-4 , B-1 , B-2 , an d B- 3 combine d Trea t Process Uni t C Stream s b y Process Uni t Alternativ e Treatmen t Standard s Strea m A-1 : On e or mor e Grou p 1 Strea m Treatmen t (Attache d Calculatio n #1 )

or Trea t wit h desig n stea m strippe r

Trea t t o achieve 9 9 percen t reductio n i n tota l VOHA P mass flo wrat e or

•Trea t t o achieve targe t effluen t tota l VOHA P

concentratio n o

f 5 0 ppm w or •Trea t t o achieve percen t reduction s i n mass flo wrat e

fo r eac h grou p o

f HAP' s i n Tabl e 9 .P.4 7



### EXISTIN G SOURC E (CONTINUED ) Combine d treatmen t o f stream s A-4 , B-1 , B-2 , an d B-3 .
•Trea t wit h desig n stea m strippe r or

•Trea t t o achiev e 9 9 percen t reductio n i n tota l VOHA P mass flo wrat e or

•Trea t t o achiev e reduction s i n mass flo wrate s fo r eac h Grou p o

f HAP' s i n Tabl e 9 or
•Trea t t o achiev e required tota l VOHA P mass remova l (bot h o fTabl e 8 HAP' s an d tota l VOHAP ) (Attache d Calculatio n # 2 ) Process Uni t C streams : Process Uni t Alternativ e Treatmen t Standar d (Attache d Calculatio n #3 )

Trea t al l stream s (combine d or individual ) t o a tota l VOHA P concentratio n < 1 0 ppm , prio r t o contac t wit h th e atmosphere or combinatio n wit h stream s fro m othe r proces s units .P.4 8



### EXAMPL E CALCULATIO N # 1 EXISTIN G SOURC E I Process Uni t A

(On e or mor

e Grou p 1 Strea m Treatment )

Strea m A- 1 Flow= 1 0 Ip m HA P Compoun d

Benzen e Nitrobenzen e Anilin e Toluen e VOHA P

Concentratio n (ppmw) 150 0 50 0 100 0 50 0 350 0 VOHA P Mas s

Flowrat e (Mg/yr ) 7.8 8 2.6 3 5.2 6 2.6 3 18. 4 TREATMEN TOPTIO N 1 : Trea t wit h desig n stea m strippe r TREATMEN TOPTIO N 2 : Trea t t o achieve 99 % reductio n i n tota l VOHA P mass flo wrat e Tota l VOHA P Mas s Flo wRate = 18. 4 Mg/y r (18.4 ) - (18.2 ) = 0.1 8 Mg/y r Tota l VOHA P mass flo wrat e afte r contro l TREATMEN TOPTIO N 3 : Trea t t o achieve targe t effluen t tota l VOHA P concentratio n o f 5 0 ppm w Tota l VOHA P concentratio n prio r t o contro l = 350 0 pp m Reduce tota l VOHA P concentratio n t o 5 0 ppm wvi a stea m strippin gP.4 9



### EXAMPL E CALCULATIO N # 1 (CONTINUED ) STREA M A- 1 TREATMEN TOPTIO N 4 : Trea t t o achiev

e percen t reductio n i n mass flo wrat e fo r eac h grou p o fHAP' s i n Tabl e 9 . Grou p A B C Compound s

Benzene , Toluen e Nitrobenzen e Anilin e Required Remova l Efficiency 9 9 9 5 7 0 Benzene : 7.8 8 Mg/y r before contro l 7.8 8 - 7.8 0 = 0.07 9 Mg/y r afte r contro l Nitrobenzene : 2.6 3 Mg/y r before contro l 2.6 3 - 2.5 0 = 0.1 3 Mg/y r afte r contro l Aniline : 5.2 6 Mg/y r before contro l 5.2 6 - 3.6 8 = 1.5 8 Mg/y r afte r contro l Toluene : 2.6 3 Mg/y r before contro l 2.6 3 - 2.6 0 = 0.02 6 Mg/y r afte r contro l Tota l VOHA P mass flo wrat e afte r contro l = 1.8 2P.5 0



### EXAMPL E CALCULATIO N # 2 EXISTIN G SOURC E Combine d Treatmen t o fStream s A-4 , B-1 , B-2 , an d B- 3 Required Mas s Remova l (RMR ) Trea t t o achieve require d tota l VOHA P mass remova l (RMR ) fo r al l Grou p I wastewate r strea m stream s RM R = K

10 e 

### V 

# E

i- i 

# u *


# ____ _ 1 

### 10 0 /HO N Wastewate r

\ Re g p . 55 0

K V C j Density o

fth e Grou p 1 wastewate r strea m (assume d t o b e 1. 0 Mg/m 3 

### fo r thi s example) . Annua l wastewate r quantity o f th e Grou p 1 wastewate r stream , cubi c meters pe r year . Averag e VOHA P concentratio n o f eac h Tabl e 8 organi c HA P compoun d "j " i n th e Grou p 1 wastewate r strea m at th e poin t o

f generation , ppmw . Required percen t remova l o f eac h VOHA P concentratio n o

f compoun d "j " (targe t remova l efficienc y fro m Tabl e 9) . Th e tota l RM R i s calculate d b y addin g togethe r th e RM R fo r eac h Grou p 1 strea m t o b

e combine d fo r treatment .P.5 1



### EXAMPL E CALCULATIO N # 2 (CONTINUED )
Strea m
A- 4 B- 1 B- 2 HA P Compoun d Toluen e Pheno l Pheno l Toluen e Benzen e VOHA P

Cone . (ppmw) 50 0 32 0 20 0 10 0 25 0 25 0 V

(Ipm ) 1 2 1 2 1 3 V (m 3 

### /yr ) 630 0 630 0 680 0 VOHA P

Mas s Loadin g 3. 2 2.0 2 1.2 6 0.6 8 2.3 9 2.3 9 F

(% ) 

### 9 9 0 7 0 0 9 9 9 9 Strea m A- 4
C j 

### F RM R (A-4 ) RM R (A-4 ) 50 0 ppm w



### 9 9 (1. 0 Mg/m 3 

### ) (630 0 m 3 

### /yr ) (50 0 ppmw) (10- 6 

### ) (99/100 ) 3.1 2 Mg/y r Strea m B- 1
C j 32 0 + 20 0 = 52 0 ppm w RM R (B-1 ) = 630 0 x10' 6 

### x [(32 0 x0 ) + (20 0 x70/100) ]

0.88 2 Mg/y rP.5 2



### EXAMPL E CALCULATIO N # 2 (CONTINUED )
Strea m B- 2 C J =10 0 pp m + 35 0 ppm w+ 35 0 pp m = 80 0

ppm w RM R (B-2 ) = (6800 ) x10 6 x[(10 0 x 0 ) + (35 0 x99/100 ) +



### (35 0 X99/100) ]

= 4.7 1 Mg/y r RMR Tota l 

### = 3.1 2 + 0.88 2 + 4.7 1 = 8.7 1 Mg/y r Grou p 2 stream s als o treate d i n biologica l treatmen t tan k

•Strea m B-3 : 1 0 Ipm , 5 0 ppm w

•Combine d stream : (measure d a t influen t t o biologica l treatmen t tank ) fro m othe r Grou p 2 wastewate r stream s
Actua l mas s remova l mus t b e a t leas t 8.7 1 Mg/yr . Remova l = [VOHA P mas s loadin g i n (Grou p 1 an d Grou p 2

streams ) - VOHA P mas s loadin g out ] xF bj o where : F bi 0 = Th e theoretica l fractio n o f VOHA P enterin g th e

uni t destroye d b y biologica l treatment , calculate d usin g CHEMDAT.7 , wit h sit e specifi c biorat e factor s develope d usin g th e biorat e protocol .P.5 3



### EXAMPL E CALCULATIO N # 3

EXISTIN G SOURC E I PROCES S UNI TC : Proces s Uni t Alternativ e Treatmen t

Standar d TREATMENT : Trea t al l stream s i n proces s uni t (combine d

o rindividual ) t o a VOHA P concentratio n < 1 0 ppm wprio rt o contac t wit h ambien t ai ro rcombinatio n wit h strea m fro m othe r proces s units
. 

### Strea m C- 1 C- 2 C- 3 C- 4 VOHA P Concentratio n (ppmw ) 100 0 10 0 70 0 5 Exampl e Show n

Stream s C-1 , C-2 , an d C- 3 ar e hard-pipe d t o a stea m strippe rfo rproduc t recovery . Stea m strippe reffluen t VOHA P concentratio n < 1 0 ppm w= > meet s requirement s Strea m C- 4 VOHA P concentratio n < 1 0 ppm w= > meet s requirement s

# HAZARDOU S ORGANI C NESHA PREQUIREMENT S PROCES S VENT S OVERVIE W

• Simila

rt o NSP S forSOCM

I AirOxidatio

n Processes an

d Distillation Operation s

• Applicable t

o onl y continuou

s vent s

• Uses Tota

l Resourc e Effectiveness (TRE

) Forma tt o distinguish betwee

n Grou p 1 an d Grou p 2 Vent s

• Details specificcomplianc e provision

s fo rdifferen tcontrol options

# AL L VENT S

• Al l vent s subjec tt o initia l TR E Determination Parameters : flowrate , ne theating value , tota

l organiccompoun

d (TOC ) emission rate , an

d tota l organicHA

Pemission rat

e

• Associate

d monitoring, reporting , an d recordkeepin

g requirement

s dependin

g o n contro l option

•. •'

## GROU P1 VENT S

• TR E value <_1. 0 $11,000/M g HA Premoved fo rnewsource s $5,000/M g HA Premoved fo rexistin g source s

• Achieve compliance usin g on e of th e following : Combustion Device : Reduce emission s of total organi cHA Po rTO C (les s methane and ethane ) by 9 8 weight-percento r2 0 parts pe rmillio n by volum e (ppmv)

• Halogenated ventstream s >_10 0 ppmvof halogenate d compound s require aci d gas scrubbing Flare : Follo wrequirement s i n Genera

l Provision s Recover y Devic e o rProces s Change to increas e TRE valu e an d change vents to "Grou

p 2 " Vents

U l

# GROU P2 VENT S

• TR E value > 1. 0

• Achieve compliance usin g on e of th e following : Recover y Device : Maintai n TR

E index valu e > 1. 0 atfinal recovery device outlet Proces s Change : Maintai n TRE valu e > 1. 0 prio rt o releas e t o th e atmosphere

• Vr .



## TES T METHOD S

Measurementof

TO C o rHAP : Metho d 1 8 Metho d 30 1 Measurementof

Scrubberparameters : Metho d 2 6 Metho d 26 A Metho d 30 1

# MONITORIN G REQUIREMENT S

• Simila

rt o NSP S fo rAirOxidatio

n Processes an

d Distillation Operation

s

• Monitorin

g o f acid ga s scrubber

s require d

• No monitorin

g provision

s forBoilers/Proces s Heater s using ven

tstrea m a s primar y fue l

' -

# RECORDKEEPING/REPORTIN G REQUIREMENT S

• Simila

rt o NSP S forAirOxidatio

n Processe

s an d Distillation Operation

s

• Initia l an d PeriodicReportin

g Initial : Demonstrat

e complianc

e wit h standar d Periodic : Exceedance

s o f initia l parameter

s an d measurement

s

• Recordkeepin

g o f monitorin

g result s an d initia l testresult

s

# REFERENCE MATERIAL S

b >

## TES T METHOD S

TR E DETpiMINATIO N Selectio n o

f sampling site Ventstrea

m flowrat

e Concentration of

OrganicCompoun

d Concentration of

Carbon Monoxide and Hydroge n Watervapo rcontent METHOD 1 o rI A (Par

t60 , Appendix A ) 2 , 2A , 2C , o r2 D (Par

t60 , Appendix A ) 1 8 (Par t60 , Appendi

x A) AST M D1946-77 4 (Par t60 , Appendix A)

## TEST METHOD S
COMBUSTIO

N DEVICE Selectio n o f

samplin g site Ga s Volumetricflo

wrat e Tota l organi cHA Po rTO C 9 8 weightpercen to r2 0 ppm

v METHOD 1 o rI A (Par

t60 , Appendix A ) 2 , 2A , 2C , o r2 D (Par

t60 , Appendix A) 1 8 (Par t60 , Appendix A ) o rMetho d validate d t o Metho d 30 1 (Par t63 , Appendix A)

< .

## TES T METHOD S
SCRUBBE

R Measured concentration of compounds containing halogens (Applicabilit

y cutof f determination) Complianc

e wit h 0. 5 mg/dsc

m limito r99 % efficienc

y METHOD 1 8 (Par t60 , Appendi

x A) , o rmetho d validate d t o Metho d 30 1 (Par

t63 , Appendix A ) 26 , 26 A (Par t60 , Appendi

x A) , o rmetho d validated t o Metho d 30 1 (Par

t63 , Appendix A ) 

# ::;1; M Performanc

e Test 

## •l : 

## i;li|2:ii K 2 2 (Par t60 , Appendi

x A) 1 8 (Par t60 , Appendi

x A) AST M D1946-7

7 ASTM D2382-76 2 , 2A , 2C , o

r2 D (Par t60 , Appendix A )CONTRO L DEVICE Incinerato r Boiler/Proces s Heater<_4 4 M W an d no t using ventstrea

m a s primar y fue l Boiler/Proces s Heaterusing ventstream a s primar y fue l Boiler/Proces s Heater> 4 4 M W Scrubbe r Flar e MONTlpRIN G REQUIREMENT S Temperatures , dependin g on typ e of incinerato r(Se e 63.117 , Tabl e 3 ) Combustion temperature N o monitoring require d No monitoring require d L/ G ratio , pH o f

scrubbe reffluent Presenc e of flame atpilo tlight

RECOVER

Y DEVICE 1 < TR E Valu e < . 8. 0

TR E > 8. 0 MONITORIN G REQUIREMENT S TR E parameters (i.e. , flowrate , netheatin g value , etc. ) Temps , specifi cgravity , stea m mass flow, concentratio n level depending o n typ e of

recover y device (63.117 , Se e Tabl e 4 ) N o monitorin g require d Change in construction/operatio n thatchang e TRE valu eControl Device :

Incinerato r Boiler/Proces s Heate r

_< . 4 4 MWan dno t usin g vent

strea ma s primar y fuel

Boiler/Proces s Heate r

> 4 4 MW Scrubbe r

Flar e

All Device s Bypas s Line s A U vent s RECORPKEEPING/REPORTIN GR^UmEMENT S *Percen t reductio no f

concentratio nof

HA Po r TO C Exceedance s in63.117 , Tabl e 3 "Locatio n o

f introductio no

f ven t strea m •Percen t reductio ni nconcentratio nof HA Po r TO C Exceedance s i n63.117 , Tabl e 3 •Locatio n of

introductio no

f ven t strea m Percen t reductio no r

outle t concentratio nof

hyroge nhalide s an d halogen s Exceedance s i n63.117 , Tabl e 3 •Visibl e emission s readin g Absenc e o

f pilo t flame Operatin g parameter s in63.117 , Tabl e 3 Notificatio nt o Administrato r of complianc e optio n Strea mdiverte dthroug hbypas s lin e o r inspectio nof

seal no t close d o r seal change di

f bypas s lin e valv e use d •Schemati c Diagramo

f vent streams , collectio nsystems , fuel systems , combustio ndevices , an dbypas s system s Initia l Reportin g

b >RECOVER Y DEVICE 1 < TR E Value <

_8. 0
TR E > 8. 0 RECQRDKEEPING/REPORTIN G R^UIREMENT S A U measurement

s an d calculation s fo rTR E determinatio n Exceedances i n 63.117 , Tabl e 4 A U measurement

s and calculation s fo rTR E determinatio n Change in construction/operatio n thatchang e TR E valu e

. . -\ ' * .

TABL E 3 . MONITORIN GAN D REPORTING/RECORDKEEPIN GREQUIREMENT S FO

RCOMPLYIN

G WITH 9 8 WEIGHT-PERCEN T REDUCTIO

N O RTO C EMISSION S O

F 2 0 PPM V
Type o f Combustio

n Devic e Use

dfo r Complianc e Therma l Incinerator

Catalyti c Incinerator

., . Monitorin g Equipmen t Required * Temperatur e monitorin

g devic e (installe

di n firebo xor i n th e ductwork immediatel y downstrea

m o f th e firebox) c equippe d wit ha continuou s recorde r {63.114(a)(1) ) Temperatur e monitorin

g devic e (installe

di n ga s strea

m immediately befor e an

dafte r catalys t bed ) equippe dwit ha continuou s recorde r {63.114(a)(1) ) Parameter s t o b e Monitored 3 Average firebo

x temperature

Average temperature upstrea m an d downstrea

m o f th e catalys t be d Recordkeepin g Requirements " Continuou s record s

Continuou s record s Paramete r I Boundar y 1 Exceedance s t o 1 Recor dan d1 Report 3 | Al l 3-hou

r | period s o f 1 operatio

nwhen| averag e j combustio

n| temperatur e i s 1 >2 8 ° C (5 0 °F ) | belo w th e averag e f value measuredV durin g th e mos t recent performanc e test . Al l 3-hou

r period s o f j operatio

nwhenj th e averag e 1 temperatur e o f | ven t strea

m 1 upstrea m o f th e [ catalys t be

di s [ >2 8 ° C (5 0 °F ) belo w th e average | value fro

m th e | mos t recent | performanc e test , fTABL E 3 (Continued )

Type o f Combustio

n Devic e Use

dfo r Complianc e Catalyti c Incinerator (Continued )

Boile r o r Proces s Heate r witha desig

n hea t input capacity <4 4 megawatt s an dVen t Strea

m i s no t th

e primar y fue l
Flar e Monitorin g Equipmen t Required 3

Temperatur e monitorin

g devic e (installe

di n firebox ) equippe d wit h continuou s recorde r {63.114(a)(3) )
Hea t sensin

g devic e {63.114(a)(2) ) Parameter s t o b e Monitored 3

Averag e combustio

n temperatur e

Presenc e o f a flam e at th e pilo t ligh

t Recordkeepin g Req u i rement s "

Continuou s record s

Continuou s record s Paramete r Boundar y Exceedance s t o Recor dan d Report 3 Al l 3-hou

r period s o f operationwhen the averag e temperatur e differenc e acros s th e catalys t be

d i s <80 % o f th

e averag e temperatur e differenc e measureddurin

g the mos t recent performanc e test . Al l 3-hou

r period s o f operationwhen averag e combustion temperatur e i s >2 8 ° C (5 0 °F ) belo w th e averag e valu e fro

m th e mos t recen t performanc e test . Al l period s whe n| th e pilo t flam

e | i s absen t 1

_-» .TABL E3 (Continued)
. Typ e o f Combustio

n Devic e Used fo

r Complianc e Al l combustio

n device s Monitorin g Equipmen t Required 3 1 . Flo w indicator equipped wit h continuou s recorde r installe

d a t al l bypas s line s t o th

e atmospher e or 2 . Sea l valve s closed wit h car-sea l or lock-and-ke

y (63.114 ) configuratio

n Parameter s t o b e Monitored 3 1 . Presenc e o f flo w diverte d t o th e atmospher e fro m th e contro l devic e or
2 . Monthl y inspection s o f seale

d valve s Recordkeepin g Requirements ^ 1 . Continuou s record s o f flow/n o flo w o r

2 . Record s o f monthl y inspection s Paramete r

Boundar y Exceedance s t o Recor d an d Report 3 1 . Period s whenth e ven t strea m i s diverted throug ha bypas s lin e or
2 . Inspection s j tha t sho

w 1 valve s ar e | no t seale

d close d or sea l ha s beenchange

dTABL E 3 (Continued )
1 Type o f 1 Combustio

n 1 Devic e Usedfo

r 1 Complianc e 1 Scrubbe r (fo

r ven t stream

s wit hgreate r tha n100 ppm

v halogenated compounds . Note : Controlledb

y a combustio

n devic e othe r tha na flare ) Monitorin g Equipmen t Required 3 p H monitorin

g devic e (63.114(a)(4)) , an d

Flo w meter s t o measur e scrubbe r liqui dinfluent an dinle t ga s flo w rate s Parameter s t o

b e Monitored 3 p H o f scrubbe r effluent

Scrubbe r liquid/ga s rati o Recordkeepin g Requirements " Continuou s record s

Continuou s record s Paramete r Boundar y Exceedance s t o Recor dan d Report 3 Al l 3-hou

r period s o f operatio

nwhen th e averag e p

H o f th e scrubbe r effluen t i s more tha n1 p H uni t belo w the value measured durin

g th e mos t recent performanc e tes t Al l 3-hou

r period s o f I operatio

nwhe nj th e L/ Grati o i s { les s than 9 5 percen t o f th

e value measured durin g the mos t recent performanc e tes t 3 Regulatory

citation s ar e liste di nbrackets . ^Continuou s record s requir e measurement s at leas t onc e ever y 1 5 minutes . c Monito r ma

y b e installe

dinthe ductwork immediately downstrea

m o f th e firebo

xbefor e an y substantia l hea t exchang e i s encountered .TABL E 4 . MONITORIN GAN D REPORTING/RECORDKEEPINGREQUIREMENT S FO R MAINTAININGA

TR E INDE XVALU E > 1. 0 an d< 8. 0 * ' V • >

Fina l Recover y Devic e Absorber b

Condenser 0 Monitorin g

Equipmen t Required 3 Scrubbin g liqui d temperatur e monito r equippe dwit ha continuou s recorde r (63.114(b)(1)} , and

Specifi c gravit y monito r equippe d wit ha continuou s recorde r (63.114(b)(1) )

Condense r exi t temperatur e monitorin g devic e equippe dwit h continuou s recorde r (63.114(b)(2) ) Parameter s t o b e Monitore d Averag e exi t temperatur e o f th e absorbin g liqui d

Exi t specifi c gravit y

(o r alternativ e paramete r tha t measure s th e degre e o f absorbin g liqui d saturation , i f approve db

y th e Administrator ) Averag e exi t (produc t side ) temperatur e Recordkeepin g Requirements 0 Continuou s record s

Continuou s record s

Continuou s record s Boundar y Exceedance s t o Report 3 Al l 3-hou r period s o f operatio nwhe n averag e temperatur e i s >1 1 ° C (2 0 °F ) abov e th e averag e valu e fro

m th e mos t recen t performanc e test . Al l 3-hou r period s o f operatio nwhe n averag e liqui d specifi c gravit y i s >0. 1 uni t abov e o r below

th e averag e valu e fro m th e mos t recen t performanc e test .
Al l 3-hou r period s o f operatio nwhe n averag e temperatur e i s > 6 ° C (l l °F ) abov e th e averag e valu e fro

m th e mos t recen t performanc e test . HP.7 3

" l

4

• 

### Hazardou s Organi cNESHA P Transfe rOperation s Similarto Benzene TransferOperations NESHAP Applicable to loading of

: Tan kTrucks Rai l Car s Use s vapo rpressure an

d throughputto determine Grou p 1 and Grou p 2 rack s

### Grou p 1 Rack s

• Group 1 racks

vp _>

_1. 5 psia throughput
_

> 170,00 0 gal/y r

• Contro

l - 98 % o r< 2 0 ppm

c

• Contro

l acid gases - 99 % o r100 pp m

• Expanded compliance provisions to additiona l control systems

• Allowus e o f

eithe rMethod 18 , 25A , o r30 1 fo rcompliance demonstration

• Recordkeeping forGrou p 1 racks to proces s vent s provisions 4 \ 

### V . fcP.7 5

ATTACHMEN

T H

### Hazardou s Organi cNESHA P Storag e Vessel s
Similarto NSPS forVOL Storage an d Benzene Storage Differ s in : Use s differentvaporpressures an d capacit y criteri afor control Adde d requirement

s forfittings forexterna

l floating roo

f tanks Adde d requirement

s forexterna

l floating roof

tanks converted to interna

l floating roof Reporting : Initia l repor t Report s whe n detectsea

l failure