alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Lone Star Industries, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 33-55377) and S-8 (File Nos.
33-55277, 33-55261, 33-55229, 333-11057 and 333-11059) of our report, dated
February 3, 1997, which includes an explanatory paragraph related to the
Company's reorganization effective April 14, 1994, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Lone Star Industries,
Inc. and Consolidated Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for the
years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, the nine months ended December 31, 1994
and the three months ended March 31, 1994, which report is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.






Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Stamford, Connecticut
March 24, 1997
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 81 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company.    /s/ Ted R. Sharp DATE:  March 20, 2007 Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and will be retained by Little Squaw Gold Mining Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(79 South. 879)

#### VANN v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF HEADLAND.

(4 Div. 565.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 6, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Henry County; H. A. Pearce, Judge.

Pettus, Puller & Lapsley, of Selma, for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
### Use of water by bottom-land vegetation in lower Safford Valley, Arizona

By: Joseph S. GatewoodT. W. RobinsonB. R. ColbyJ. D. HemL.C. Halpenny

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1103

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 4000.27 What if I hand deliver my submission or issuance?

Your filing or issuance date is the date of receipt of your hand-delivered submission or issuance at the proper address. A hand-delivered issuance need not be delivered while the intended recipient is physically present. For example, unless you have reason to believe that the intended recipient will not receive the notice within a reasonable amount of time, a notice is deemed to be received when you place it in the intended recipient's office mailbox. Our Web site, *http://www.pbgc.gov,* and the instructions to our forms, identify the proper addresses for filings with us.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Triad Hospitals, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James D. Shelton,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350,
as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ James D. Shelton
-----------------------
James D. Shelton
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2002
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Crdentia Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, James D. Durham, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to my knowledge:

1.                                     the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.                                     theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the datesand for the periods indicated.

This Certificationhas not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.
| Date:    November 14, 2006 |   | By:                                  |   /s/ James D. Durham |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                                      |   | James D. Durham                      |
|                                      |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
#### § 4062.1 Purpose and scope.

The purpose of this part is to set forth rules for determination and payment of the liability incurred, under section 4062(b) of ERISA, upon termination of any single-employer plan and, to the extent appropriate, determination of the liability incurred with respect to multiple employer plans under sections 4063 and 4064 of ERISA. This part also sets forth rules for determining the amount of liability incurred under section 4063 of ERISA pursuant to the occurrence of a cessation of operations as described by section 4062(e) of ERISA. The provisions of this part regarding the amount of liability to the PBGC that is incurred upon termination of a single-employer plan apply with respect to a plan for which a notice of intent to terminate under section 4041(c) of ERISA is issued or proceedings to terminate under section 4042 of ERISA are instituted after December 17, 1987. Those provisions also apply, to the extent described in paragraph (a) of this section, to the amount of liability for withdrawal from a multiple employer plan after that date.

[61 FR 34079, July 1, 1996, as amended at 71 FR 34822, June 16, 2006]
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0356 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-SW-067-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
§ 500.201 Applicability of procedures and rules. ( a ) The procedures and rules contained herein prescribe the administrative process necessary for a determination: ( 1 ) To suspend or revoke, or to refuse to issue or renew, a Certificate of Registration authorized under the Act and these regulations; and
( 2 ) To impose an assessment of civil money penalties for violations of the Act or of these regulations.
( b ) The procedures and rules contained herein also specify the administrative responsibility under section 102(5) of the Act with regard to a designation by a court of the Secretary as an agent of an applicant for a certificate of registration in any action against such applicant, if said applicant has left the jurisdiction in which the action is commenced or otherwise has become unavailable to accept service.
**Exhibit 10.47**

**Base Salaries forNamed Executive Officers**

InDecember 2006, the base salary increases for executive officers for 2007 wereapproved. The 2007 salaries for LG&E’s named executive officers are asfollows:

| Officer Name    | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | **2007 Base  Salary** | ** ** |
|----------------------|------------|------------|------------|----------------------------|------------|
| Hermann, Chris       |       | $          | 295,400    |                       |
|                 |       |       |       |
| McCall, John R.      |       | $          | 460,200    |                       |
|                 |       |       |       |
| Rives, S. Bradford   |       | $          | 375,400    |                       |
|                 |       |       |       |
| Thompson, Paul W.    |       | $          | 350,400    |                       |
|                 |       |       |       |
| Staffieri, Victor A. |       | $          | 757,300    |                       |

 

The salary increases wereeffective January 1, 2007.

----
On respondent’s motion for reconsideration filed April 2,

reconsideration allowed; decision (114 Or App 433, 833 P2d 1381 (1992)) withdrawn; conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing May 19, 1993

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*ROBERTO MUNAZREZ-GUTIERREZ, *Appellant.*

(901136266; CA A68433)

852 P2d 969

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for motion.

No appearance *contra.*

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reconsideration allowed; decision of July 22, 1992, withdrawn; conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing. *State v. Ferrell,*315 Or 213, 843 P2d 939 (1992).
#### § 500.160 Approved State plans.

(a) The Secretary, in accordance with the authority referred to in § 500.155 of this part, has delegated the following functions to the States listed herein below:

| State | Function |
| --- | --- |
| Florida | Receive, handle, process applications and issue certificates of registration. |
| New Jersey | Receive, handle, process applications and issue certificates of registration. |
| Virginia | Receive, handle, process applications and issue certificates of registration. |

(b) Every State agreement entered into pursuant to the authority referred to in § 500.155 of this part shall be available for public inspection and copying in accordance with 29 CFR part 70.

(c) Every enumerated delegated function shall be valid in all states.

[48 FR 36741, Aug. 12, 1983, as amended at 49 FR 5112, Feb. 10, 1984; 50 FR 42163, Oct. 18, 1985]
From: Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US 

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

Cc: Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim DeMocker/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia 

Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Schwab, Margo" <Margo_Schwab@omb.eop.gov>, 

RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 12/15/2011 04:09 PM 

Subject: RE: RIA Executive Summary 

Cortney, we are okay with most of your edits. We had one alternative 

edit towards the end of ES1., shown in the attached. Please let us know 

if it is acceptable to you. If so, we will add this to the overall RIA 

package and make the other edits to Chapter 5 and 7 that we discussed 

earlier today. We expect the overall RIA will be coming over sometime 

tonight. 

Thanks, 

Bryan 

Executive Summary_InteragencycommentsunderEO13563_12152011_EPAresponse.docx 

Dr. Bryan J. Hubbell 

Leader, Risk and Benefits Group 

Health and Environmental Impacts Division 

U.S. EPA/OAQPS (C504-02) 

RTP, NC 27711 

(919) 541-0621 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Schwab, Margo" 

<Margo_Schwab@omb.eop.gov> 

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Bryan 

Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim DeMocker/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 12/15/2011 03:08 PM 

Subject: RE: RIA Executive Summary 

Hi, 

Attached are interagency comments on this draft of the executive summary. 

Your redline changes have been accepted and changes have made to that 

version. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney 
 

From: Lamson.Amy@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Lamson.Amy@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 1:47 PM 

To: Higgins, Cortney; Schwab, Margo 

Cc: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov; Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov; 

Hubbell.Bryan@epamail.epa.gov; DeMocker.Jim@epamail.epa.gov 

Subject: RIA Executive Summary 

 

Cortney and Margo, 

Attached is the revised Executive Summary, as requested. 

Thank you! 

Amy Lamson 

Risk and Benefits Group 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

109 TW Alexander Dr. (C439-02) 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-4383 

Fax: (919) 541-0839 

Executive Summary_InteragencycommentsunderEO13563_12152011.docx
§ 500.232 Consent findings and order. ( a ) *General.* At any time after the commencement of a proceeding under this part, but prior to the reception of evidence in any such proceeding, a party may move to defer the receipt of any evidence for a reasonable time to permit negotiation of an agreement containing consent findings and an order disposing of the whole or any part of the proceeding. The allowance of such deferment and the duration thereof shall be at the discretion of the Administrative Law Judge, after consideration of the nature of the proceeding, the requirements of the public interest, the representations of the parties, and the probability of an agreement being reached which will result in a just disposition of the issues involved.
( b ) *Content.* Any agreement containing consent findings and an order disposing of a proceeding or any part thereof shall also provide: ( 1 ) That the order shall have the same force and effect as an order made after full hearing;
( 2 ) That the entire record on which any order may be based shall consist solely of the notice of administrative determination (or amended notice, if one is filed), and the agreement;
( 3 ) A waiver of any further procedural steps before the Administrative Law Judge; and
( 4 ) A waiver of any right to challenge or contest the validity of the findings and order entered into in accordance with the agreement.
( c ) *Submission.* On or before the expiration of the time granted for negotiations, the parties or their authorized representatives or their counsel may: ( 1 ) Submit the proposed agreement for consideration by the Administrative Law Judge; or
( 2 ) Inform the Administrative Law Judge that agreement cannot be reached.
( d ) *Disposition.* In the event an agreement containing consent findings and an order is submitted within the time allowed therefor, the Administrative Law Judge, within thirty (30) days thereafter, shall, if satisfied with its form and substance, accept such agreement by issuing a decision based upon the agreed findings.
EXHIBIT 32



The following statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purposes of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), which carries with it certain criminal penalties in the event of a knowing or willful misrepresentation.



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20549



RE: Lee Enterprises, Incorporated



Ladies and Gentlemen:



In accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that to our knowledge:



|(i) | this annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended September 27, 2009 (Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lee Enterprises, Incorporated for
the periods presented in the Annual Report.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated as of this 11thday of December 2009.



|                                                |  |  |  |                                                      
|----------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Mary E. Junck                               |  |  |  | /s/ Carl G. Schmidt                                  
|Mary E. Junck                                   |  |  |  | Carl G. Schmidt                                      
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Lee Enterprises, Incorporated and will be retained by Lee Enterprises, Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
## SERVED: NOVEMBER 28, 2012

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
1N THE MATTER OF 

### COPPER VALLEY AIR SERVICE, LLC FAA DOCKETNo. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS No. FAA-2012-0475


### ORDER OF DISMISSAL On June 

### 15, 2012, the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafterreferred to as "Complainant") filed a Complaint. OnJune 7, 

### 2012, Respondent Copper Valley Air Service, LLC (hereinafter "Respondent") had requested a hearing. OnNovember 15, 2012, Complainant movedto terminate the proceedings and dismissthe case, citing settlement. Complainant's motion is the functional equivalent of, and will be treated as, a withdrawal ofits Complaint. 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney may withdraw

## acomplaint orpartymay withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge. Ifan agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings underthis subpart with prejudice." WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal ofComplaint having been read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows:

### 2

1. Complainant's Withdrawal ofComplaint be and is hereby granted; and 2. This proceeding be·and is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

# /0~C,~**R~chard** 

### C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative LawJudge Attachment**~** 

### Service List

### 3



### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite2W1000 1 

### ONE COPY Copper Valley Air Service, LLC

. . 

### Erin B. Marston, 

### Respondent's Counsel Marston & Cole, P.C. 821 N.Street, Suite 208 Anchorage, AK 99501 TEL: 907-277-8001 FAX: 907-277-8002 Glenn 

### H. Brown; 

### Complainant's Counsel Senior Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Alaskan Region, AAL-7 Federal Aviation Administration 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 TEL: 907-271-5271 FAX: 907-271-2800 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, 

### Administrative LawJudge Office orHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S..E. (El1-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2012-0475 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., WiiburWright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC.20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.