alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Action brought on 20 September 2004 by Gregorio Valero Jordana against Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-385/04)

(2004/C 284/54)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 20 September 2004 by Gregorio Valero Jordana, residing in Brussels, represented by Massimo Merola and Isabelle van Schendel, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The applicant in the present case objects to the award of one priority point under the 2003 evaluation exercise and also to the appointing authority's refusal to promote him to grade A4 for the same exercise.

In support of his claims, he asserts first of all that Article 45 of the Staff Regulations requires that merit be the determining criterion for the award of priority points by the Directorate General and for promotion. None the less, in the system called in question in the present case, promotions are determined by the award of priority points, on the proposal of each Directorate General or Promotion Committee, without a comparative examination of the merits of all officials eligible for promotion in each grade. Consequently, Articles 6, 8 and 10 of the Commission's decision of 26 April 2002 on the general provisions for the implementation of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations (DGE) breach Article 45 of the Staff Regulations. Furthermore, by awarding to each Directorate General a uniform quota of points per official, those rules prevent the appointing authority from carrying out that comparative examination.

The applicant states in that regard that the contested decisions are the result of the criteria established in the Legal Service for the award of priority points, which lead to those points being awarded in priority to officials with the most seniority in grade, irrespective of their merits. Such an approach constitutes a misuse of power, since it seeks to bring about the promotion of the largest number and the preparation of promotions for future years, i.e. to achieve an aim different from that envisaged by the Staff Regulations, which is to reward merit.

The applicant further relies on two procedural defects, in so far as the award of the priority points in issue was, he alleges, decided in the absence of a proposal from the Directorate of the Legal Service and in breach of the duty to state reasons.

The applicant also claims that there has been a breach of the principle that an official should have reasonable career prospects and that Articles 9, 12(3) and 13 of the DGE are illegal.

----
EXHIBIT 10.1

                      AMENDMENT TO SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
                              DATED MARCH 31, 2015

                          BY AND AMONG T-REX OIL, INC.
                                       AND
                        WESTERN INTERIOR OIL & GAS CORP.
                                       AND
                                ITS SHAREHOLDERS


         For and in consideration of mutual benefits,  detriments, and promises,
and the  covenants  herein,  the  parties  agree to  amend  the  Share  Exchange
Agreement, as follows:

         Section2.01(b)  is hereby  deleted  and  substituted  therefore  is the
following:

         T-Rex shall purchase 17 percent of the Western Interior Oil & Gas Corp.
common  shares  as  described  as  follows  for  $1,001,333.75  within  6 months
hereafter:

                  McCutcheon Revocable Living Trust...........28,737
                  Leo A. Giangiacomo...........................2,337
                  Kathleen Giangiacomo...........................559
                  Ocana Investments LLC........................1,452

         Section  2.03  is  amended  to  delete   "9,000,000"   and   substitute
"7,470,000."

         Section 4.02 is hereby  amended to replace the first  sentence with the
following:

         "The authorized  capital stock of TRO consists of 275,000,000 shares of
TRO Common Stock and  50,000,000  shares of Preferred  Stock of which  7,809,857
common shares are outstanding on the date hereof  (excluding shares reserved for
options pursuant to Board Minutes.)."

         Schedule  1.01 is amended to be Schedule  2.01 and is amended to delete
"9,000,000" and substitute "7,470,000."

         Schedule  6.01(b)(6)  shall be amended to read "March 28, 2015" instead
of "April 30, 2015."

         Section 7.09 is amended as follows:

         "$300,000  payable to stockholders"  is amended to read  "$1,001,333.75
shareholder repurchase obligation." The last sentence of Section 7.09 is deleted
hereby.

         Section  8.02(g)(3)  is  redesignated  as (h)(3) and in (h)(3)  "7%" is
amended to "17%."

         Section 8.03(e)(1) is amended as follows:

         "1.01(a)" is amended to read "2.01(a)."

         Section 8.03(e)(2) is amended as follows:

         "," shall be changed to "2."



<PAGE>



         This amendment shall be deemed effective at March 28, 2015, the date of
the original Share Exchange Agreement.

         All other terms and shall remain unmodified.

Dated: April 9, 2015

T-Rex Oil, Inc.                             Western Interior Oil & Gas Corp.



By: __/s/__________________________         By: ___/s/_________________________
Mi Lista de Verificación de 

Impuestos

Si usted está inscrito en un plan médico a través del Mercado de Seguros Médicos, recibirá por 

correo, a principios de febrero, el Formulario 1095-A. Traiga el formulario a su cita de impuestos 

junto con sus W-2 y otros registros de impuestos. Revise esta lista de recordatorios para la 

información que necesitará o pregúntele a su preparador de impuestos antes de su cita.

Información para cada miembro del hogar

 Declaración de impuestos del año pasado

 Número de Seguro Social (SSN en inglés)

 Fecha de nacimiento

 Registros de cuidado infantil, incluyendo el número de identificación del proveedor

 La pensión alimenticia que se pagó y el SSN del ex cónyuge

La información de ingresos y de impuestos para el año fiscal

Su Formulario 1095-A del Mercado

Formularios W-2 de todos los empleadores

Formularios 1099 que muestran intereses, reembolsos, créditos u otros pagos que 

recibió

Información sobre cualquier ingreso de autoempleo

Recibos de su pequeño negocio, si tiene uno

Recibos de alquiler, bienes raíces, regalías, asociaciones, corporación S y fideicomisos

Compensación por desempleo

Beneficios del Seguro Social
Deducciones, ajustes y créditos fiscales para el año fiscal

Formularios 1098 u otras declaraciones de hipoteca

Gastos como el autoempleo, educación y el cuidado de niños

Impuestos de bienes raíces y propiedad personal

Contribuciones de IRA u otras contribuciones de ahorro de jubilación

Gastos, como de adopción, médicos, o ciertos costos de educación

Gastos de empleado

Para más información: 

• Visite IRS.gov/freefile or IRS.gov/VITA

• Visite CuidadoDeSalud.gov/es/taxes/.

• Llame al Centro de Llamadas del Mercado al 1-800-318-2596.

• Los usuarios de TTY pueden llamar al 1-855-889-4325.

Usted tiene derecho a obtener la información del Mercado en un formato accesible. También tiene el derecho de presentar 

una queja si piensa que ha sido discriminado. Visite https://www.cms.gov/About-CMS/Agency-Information/Aboutwebsite/

CMSNondiscriminationNotice.html o comuníquese con el Centro de Llamadas del Mercado al 1-800-318-2596 para más 

información. Los usuarios de TTY pueden llamar al 1-855-889-4325.

CMS Producto No. 11894-S

Revisado en octubre 2017
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

KRISTINA BETH MAGOLIS 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT 

FROM INACTIVE STATUS 

ORDER

PER CURIAM 

No. 41 DB 2024 (27 RST 2024) 

Attorney Registration No. 317841 

(Bucks County) 

AND NOW, this 6t" day of June, 2024, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated May 30, 2024, is approved and it is ORDERED that 

KRISTINA BETH MAGOLIS, who has been on Inactive Status, has demonstrated that the 

petitioner has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for 

admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active 

status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the 

Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.1(f)


                                SEVENTH AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                         FIRST AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT
                                     OF THE
                      LABARGE, INC. EMPLOYEES SAVINGS PLAN


       This Seventh  Amendment to the First Amendment and Restatement of the
LaBarge, Inc. Employees Savings Plan ("Plan") executed on August 11, 1999 by
LaBarge, Inc. ("Company"), a Delaware corporation.

                                   WITNESSETH

       WHEREAS, the Company amended and restated the Plan on May 3, 1990
effective January 1, 1987; and

       WHEREAS, the amendment and restatement of the Plan was amended on June
28, 1990 effective July 1, 1990; November 30, 1993 effective October 1, 1993;
March 24, 1994 effective January 1, 1994; January 3, 1995 effective January 1,
1995; and October 26, 1995 effective January 1, 1995, and January 1, 1996 and
January 9, 1998 effective January 1, 1998; and

       WHEREAS, the Company wants to further amend the Plan;

       NOW, THEREFORE, the Company amends the Plan effective January 1, 1999 as
follows:

       Delete  Section 10.4 of Article 10 and insert the following new Section
10.4 of Article 10 in lieu thereof:

       10.4 If the value of the vested portion, determined under Section 10.5,
of a severed Participant's Accounts is $5,000 or less on the Valuation Date
immediately following the date the Participant severs under Section 10.1, the
Administrator shall cause the Trustee to distribute severance Benefits to him in
accordance with Article 11 as of such Valuation Date. If the value of the vested
portion, determined under Section 10.5, of a severed Participant's Accounts is
more than $5,000 on the Valuation Date immediately following the date the
Participant severs under Section 10.1, the Administrator shall cause the Trustee
to distribute severance Benefits to him in accordance with Article 11 following
the earliest of the Valuation Date immediately following the day the Participant
dies or consents in writing to distribution. Provided, however, that
distribution must commence on or before the Participant's Required Beginning
Date. Notwithstanding the immediately preceding sentence, distribution of
retirement Benefits of a Participant who made a written election, prior to
January 1, 1984, to have his Benefits Code ss.401(a), as in effect prior to the
enactment of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982, shall be paid
in accordance with such election.

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this amendment to be
adopted this 11th day of August 1999.

                                                LaBarge, Inc.

                                                By: /s/ Craig E. LaBarge
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Craig E. LaBarge, President
LIFE CYCLE COST OF PACKAGED SYSTEM CENTRAL A/C - SAMPLE CALCULATION (AVG VALUES), January 2001Dollar Values in 1998 $Elec Price(cent/kWh)Annual Cash Flow Cumulative Cash Flow Discounted Cash Flow Disc.LIST INPUTSAge Year Average MarginalBase Standard Diff. Base Standard Diff. Base Standard Diff.FactorELECTRICITY PRICE(cent/kWh)AverageMarginal1998 8.81 8.57ENERGY PRICE PROJECTION START YEAR Year of Purchase20068.19 7.96$2,607 $3,032$425$2,607 $3,032$425$2,607 $3,032$425Year Equip. Retires 2023 7.97 7.751 2006 8.19 7.96 $259 $217 -$41 $2,866 $3,249 $383 $2,852 $3,238 $386 0.952 2007 8.19 7.96 $259 $218 -$41 $3,125 $3,467 $342 $3,084 $3,433 $348 0.90BASE CASE DESIGN3 2008 8.16 7.94 $258 $217 -$41 $3,383 $3,684 $301 $3,304 $3,617 $313 0.85PRICE OPTIONSEER 10CHANGESEER 134 2009 8.06 7.84 $256 $215 -$41 $3,639 $3,899 $260 $3,510 $3,790 $281 0.805 2010 8.09 7.87 $257 $216 -$41 $3,896 $4,115 $219 $3,705 $3,955 $250 0.76STANDARD CASE DESIGN Total Installed Price $2,607 $42516%$3,0326 2011 8.02 7.80 $255 $215 -$40 $4,151 $4,330 $179 $3,889 $4,109 $220 0.72Annual Repair & Maint. $70 $11%$717 2012 7.99 7.77 $254 $214 -$40 $4,405 $4,543 $138 $4,063 $4,256 $193 0.68Compressor Repl. Cost $278 $8229%$3608 2013 7.98 7.76 $254 $214 -$40 $4,659 $4,757 $98 $4,227 $4,394 $167 0.65LIFETIME (years) 18.49 2014 8.01 7.79 $255 $214 -$40 $4,914 $4,972 $58 $4,383 $4,525 $142 0.61DISCOUNT RATE 5.6% Annual kWh Use 2305 -532-23%1773 Payback10 2015 8.03 7.81 $255 $215 -$41 $5,169 $5,186 $17 $4,531 $4,650 $119 0.58Annual Operating Cost (years)11 2016 8.01 7.79 $255 $214 -$40 $5,424 $5,401 -$23 $4,671 $4,768 $96 0.55ELECTRICITY PRICE IN 1998(cent/kWh)2006$259 -$41-16%$217 10.312 2017 8.01 7.79 $255 $214 -$40 $5,678 $5,615 -$64 $4,804 $4,879 $75 0.52Average 8.8113 2018 8.01 7.79 $255 $214 -$40 $5,933 $5,829 -$104 $4,929 $4,985 $55 0.49Marginal 8.57 Cumulative Cash Flow $7,584 -$240-3%$7,34414 2019 7.98 7.76 $532 $574 $41 $6,465 $6,403 -$63 $5,178 $5,252 $75 0.47Life-Cycle Cost ($) $5,629 $30%$5,63215 2020 7.97 7.75 $254 $214 -$40 $6,719 $6,616 -$103 $5,290 $5,347 $57 0.44AVERAGE UEC(kWh)250116 2021 7.97 7.75 $254 $214 -$40 $6,973 $6,830 -$143 $5,396 $5,436 $40 0.42AVERAGE SEER 9.217 2022 7.97 7.75 $254 $214 -$40 $7,227 $7,044 -$183 $5,496 $5,521 $24 0.4018 2023 7.97 7.75 $254 $214 -$40 $7,480 $7,257 -$223 $5,592 $5,601 $9 0.3819 2024 7.97 7.75 $254 $214 -$40 $7,734 $7,471 -$264 $5,682 $5,677 -$5 0.3620 2025 7.97 7.75 $254 $214 -$40 $7,988 $7,684 -$304 $5,767 $5,749 -$19 0.3421 2026 7.97 7.75 $254 $214 -$40 $8,242 $7,898 -$344 $5,848 $5,817 -$31 0.3222 2027 7.97 7.75 $254 $214 -$40 $8,495 $8,111 -$384 $5,925 $5,881 -$44 0.3023 2028 7.97 7.75 $254 $214 -$40 $8,749 $8,325 -$424 $5,997 $5,942 -$55 0.2924 2029 7.97 7.75 $254 $214 -$40 $9,003 $8,538 -$465 $6,066 $6,000 -$66 0.2725 2030 7.97 7.75 $254 $214 -$40 $9,257 $8,752 -$505 $6,131 $6,055 -$76 0.26AEO 2000 - Reference Case2006Baseline (SEER=10)30% Impr. (SEER=13)Fuel PriceComparionShow PlotShow InputsPriceMultiplierMark Up'sPackaged SystemRev Engr
§ 2520.104-48 Alternative method of compliance for model simplified employee pensions—IRS Form 5305-SEP. Under the authority of section 110 of the Act the provisions of this section are prescribed as an alternative method of compliance with the reporting and disclosure requirements set forth in part 1 of title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 in the case of a simplified employee pension (SEP) described in section 408(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 as amended (the Code) that is created by use without modification of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form *5305-SEP.* ( a ) At the time an employee becomes eligible to participate in the SEP (whether at the creation of the SEP or thereafter), the administrator of the SEP (generally the employer establishing and maintaining the SEP) shall furnish the employee with a copy of the completed and unmodified IRS Form *5305-SEP* used to create the SEP, including ( 1 ) the completed Contribution Agreement,
( 2 ) the General Information and Guidelines, and
( 3 ) the Questions and Answers.
( b ) Following the end of each calendar year the administrator of the SEP shall notify each participant in the SEP in writing of any employer contributions made under the Contribution Agreement to the participant's individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity (IRA) for that year.
( c ) If the employer establishing and maintaining the SEP selects, recommends, or in any other way influences employees to choose a particular IRA or type of IRA into which contributions under the SEP will be made, and if that IRA is subject to restrictions on a participant's ability to withdraw funds (other than restrictions imposed by the Code that apply to all IRAs), the administrator of the SEP shall give to each employee, in writing, within 90 days of the adoption of this regulation or at the time such employee becomes eligible to participate in the SEP, whichever is later, a clear explanation of those restrictions and a statement to the effect that other IRAs, into which rollovers or employee contributions may be made, may not be subject to such restrictions.
[45 FR 24869, Apr. 11, 1980]
(74 South. 1006)

#### BERRY v. FAIRBANKS CO.

(2 Div. 165.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Feb. 6, 1917.)

Appeal from City Court of Selma; J. B. Evans, Judge.

Robert A. Mangum, of Selma, for appellant. W. K. Campbell, of Selma, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**AtlanticFleet training and testing draft environmental impact statement / overseasenvironmental impact statement
 
v1|v2| v3|v4| v5|
 
SuDoc Number:D 201.2:AT 6/DRAFT
Item Number:0370 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001090833
January 28, 2019
§ 91.1039 IFR takeoff, approach and landing minimums. ( a ) No pilot on a program aircraft operating a program flight may begin an instrument approach procedure to an airport unless— ( 1 ) Either that airport or the alternate airport has a weather reporting facility operated by the U.S. National Weather Service, a source approved by the U.S. National Weather Service, or a source approved by the Administrator; and
( 2 ) The latest weather report issued by the weather reporting facility includes a current local altimeter setting for the destination airport. If no local altimeter setting is available at the destination airport, the pilot must obtain the current local altimeter setting from a source provided by the facility designated on the approach chart for the destination airport.
( b ) For flight planning purposes, if the destination airport does not have a weather reporting facility described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the pilot must designate as an alternate an airport that has a weather reporting facility meeting that criteria.
( c ) The MDA or Decision Altitude and visibility landing minimums prescribed in part 97 of this chapter or in the program manager's management specifications are increased by 100 feet and 1 ⁄ 2 mile respectively, but not to exceed the ceiling and visibility minimums for that airport when used as an alternate airport, for each pilot in command of a turbine-powered aircraft who has not served at least 100 hours as pilot in command in that type of aircraft.
( d ) No person may take off an aircraft under IFR from an airport where weather conditions are at or above takeoff minimums but are below authorized IFR landing minimums unless there is an alternate airport within one hour's flying time (at normal cruising speed, in still air) of the airport of departure.
( e ) Except as provided in § 91.176 of this chapter, each pilot making an IFR takeoff or approach and landing at an airport must comply with applicable instrument approach procedures and takeoff and landing weather minimums prescribed by the authority having jurisdiction over the airport. In addition, no pilot may take off at that airport when the visibility is less than 600 feet, unless otherwise authorized in the program manager's management specifications for EFVS operations.
[Docket No. FAA-2001-10047, 68 FR 54561, Sept. 17, 2003, as amended by Docket FAA-2013-0485, Amdt. 91-345, 81 FR 90175, Dec. 13, 2016]
jfourtf) Court of ^pealg

^an antonio, ®exas(

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00861-CR

Charles WILLIAMS,

Appellant

V.

The STATE ofTexas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-CR-3503

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court's opinion of this date, counsel's motion to withdraw is

GRANTED and the judgment ofthe trial court is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED October 9, 2013.

Rebeca C. Martinez, ^stice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         222,650
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,848,214
<DEPRECIATION>                                 851,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,553,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,503
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,792
<OTHER-SE>                                    (254,768)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,553,387
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,354
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,908
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,636
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,472
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (16,662)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (16,662)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (16,662)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.03)



</TABLE>
#### § 500.231 Appearances; representation of the Department of Labor.

The Associate Solicitor, Division of Fair Labor Standards, and such other counsel, as designated, shall represent the Secretary in any proceeding under these regulations.