alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
795 A.2d 364

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. Clyde Crady SWISHER, III, Respondent.

No. 674 Disciplinary Docket No. 3;

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

March 14, 2002.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 14th day of March, 2002, upon consideration of the Certificate of Admission of Disability by Attorney *224that respondent is suffering from disability by reason of mental infirmity which makes it impossible for him to prepare an adequate defense to complaints of professional misconduct brought ágainst him in connection with Disciplinary Board File No. 68 DB' 2001 and Office of Disciplinary Counsel File Reference Nos. C4-01-388, C4-01-435, C4-01-683 and C4-01750, it is hereby

ORDERED that Clyde Crady Swisher, III, who was placed on temporary suspension by Order of this Court dated May 9, 2001, shall be immediately transferred to inactive status pursuant to Rule 301(e), Pa.R.D.E., for an indefinite period and until a determination is made of his capacity to aid effectively in the preparation of a defense. Respondent shall comply with Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. As respondent has not provided evidence of his disability by way of an expert’s report or testimony, this matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board so that a record may be made in order to determine whether include appropriate evidence provided by respondent addressing why he is incapable of preparing an adequate defense and may include any other evidence deemed relevant to a finding under Rule 301, Pa.R.D.E. Said record shall be forwarded to the Court within sixty days of the entry of this Order, along with a recommendation from the Disciplinary Board addressing whether respondent should remain on inactive status or whether any Order of abatement of proceedings entered by this Court should be dissolved and pending disciplinary matters should proceed. All pending disciplinary proceedings against respondent shall be held in abeyance, except for the perpetuation of testimony and any further proceedings necessary pursuant to Rule 301, Pa.R.D.E.
#### § 458.59 Review of dismissal.

The complainant may obtain a review of a dismissal by filing a request for review with the Director within fifteen (15) days of service of the notice of dismissal. A copy of such request shall be served on the District Director and the respondent, and a statement of service shall be filed with the Director. The request for review shall contain a complete statement of the facts and reasons upon which a request is based.

[45 FR 15158, Mar. 7, 1980. Redesignated at 50 FR 31311, Aug. 1, 1985, as amended at 59 FR 15117, Mar. 31, 1994; 62 FR 6094, Feb. 10, 1997; 78 FR 8026, Feb. 5, 2013]
#### § 2580.412-11 Statutory provision.

Section 13 requires that the amount of the bond be fixed at the beginning of each calendar, policy or other fiscal year, as the case may be, which constitutes the reporting year of the plan for purposes of the reporting provisions of the Act. The amount of the bond shall be not less than 10 per centum of the amount of funds handled, except that any such bond shall be in at least the amount of $1,000 and no such bond shall be required in an amount in excess of $500,000: *Provided,* That the Secretary, after due notice and opportunity for hearing to all interested parties, and after consideration of the record, may prescribe an amount in excess of $500,000, which in no event shall exceed 10 per centum of the funds handled. For purposes of fixing the amount of such bond, the amount of funds handled shall be determined by the funds handled by the person, group, or class to be covered by such bond and by their predecessor or predecessors, if any, during the preceding reporting year, or if the plan has no preceding reporting year, the amount of funds to be handled during the current reporting year by such person, group, or class, estimated as provided in the regulations in this part. With respect to persons required to be bonded, section 13 shall be deemed to require the bond to insure from the first dollar of loss up to the requisite bond amount and not to permit the use of deductible or similar features whereby a portion of the risk within such requisite bond amount is assumed by the insured. Any request for variance from these requirements shall be made pursuant to the provisions of section 13(e) of the Act.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 174 (Monday, September 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 55135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21878]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8455]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Tajikistan

    Pursuant to Section 7031 (b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L. 112-74) (``the Act''), and Department of State Delegation of 
Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the 
national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of 
Section 7031 (b)(1) of the Act with respect to Tajikistan and I hereby 
waive this restriction.
    This determination and accompanying Memorandum of justification 
shall be reported to the Congress, and the determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: June 13, 2012.
Thomas R. Nides,
Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources.

    Editorial Note: This document was received at the Office of the 
Federal Register September 4, 2013.
[FR Doc. 2013-21878 Filed 9-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-03-P
```
`[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 27 Referred in House (RFH)]







110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 27


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 17, 2007

              Referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION


 
Supporting the goals and ideals of ``National Purple Heart Recognition 
                                 Day''.

Whereas the Purple Heart is the oldest military decoration in the world in 
        present use;
Whereas the Purple Heart is awarded in the name of the President of the United 
        States to members of the Armed Forces who are wounded in a conflict with 
        an enemy force or are wounded while held by an enemy force as prisoners 
        of war, and is awarded posthumously to the next of kin of members of the 
        Armed Forces who are killed in a conflict with an enemy force or who die 
        of wounds received in a conflict with an enemy force;
Whereas the Purple Heart was established on August 7, 1782, during the 
        Revolutionary War, when General George Washington issued an order 
        establishing the Honorary Badge of Distinction, otherwise known as the 
        Badge of Military Merit;
Whereas the award of the Purple Heart ceased with the end of the Revolutionary 
        War, but was revived in 1932, the 200th anniversary of George 
        Washington's birth, out of respect for his memory and military 
        achievements; and
Whereas observing National Purple Heart Recognition Day is a fitting tribute to 
        George Washington and to the more than 1,535,000 recipients of the 
        Purple Heart, approximately 550,000 of whom are still living: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of ``National Purple 
        Heart Recognition Day'';
            (2) encourages all people in the United States to learn 
        about the history of the Purple Heart and to honor its 
        recipients; and
            (3) calls upon the people of the United States to conduct 
        appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to demonstrate 
        support for members of the Armed Forces who have been awarded 
        the Purple Heart.

            Passed the Senate July 16, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.`
#### § 502.17 Concurrent actions.

The taking of any one of the actions referred to above shall not be a bar to the concurrent taking of any other action authorized by the H-2A provisions of the Act and these regulations, or the regulations of 20 CFR part 655.
§ 22.20 Disclosure of documents. ( a ) Upon written request to the reviewing official, the defendant may review any relevant and material documents, transcripts, records, and other materials that relate to the allegations set out in the complaint and upon which the findings and conclusions of the investigating official under § 22.4(b) are based, unless such documents are subject to a privilege under Federal law. Upon payment of fees for duplication, the defendant may obtain copies of such documents.
( b ) Upon written request to the reviewing official, the defendant also may obtain a copy of all exculpatory information in the possession of the reviewing official or investigating official relating to the allegations in the complaint, even if it is contained in a document that would otherwise be privileged. If the document would otherwise be privileged, only that portion containing exculpatory information must be disclosed.
( c ) The notice sent to the Attorney General from the reviewing official as described in § 22.5 is not discoverable under any circumstances.
( d ) The defendant may file a motion to compel disclosure of the documents subject to the provisions of this section. Such a motion may only be filed with the ALJ following the filing of an answer pursuant to § 22.9.
[No. 48256-4-I.

Division One.

November 12, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Richard Forest Fox, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 00-1-10420-7, Jeffrey M. Ramsdell, J., entered February 15, 2001. *Dismissed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 2, 2011

p0126 

# Order

February 2, 2011

141515

MICHAEL E. TINDALL, Plaintiff,

v SC: 141515 AGC: 0363/09 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and
the Grievance Administrator is DIRECTED to provide the pl aintiff with a copy of the respondent attorney’s answer, as well as a copy of the resp ondent’s supporting documents, unless the Administrator determines that there is cause for not disclosing
some or all of the su pporting documents.
#### § 4281.4 Collection of information.

The collection of information requirements contained in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1212-0032.
#### § 4281.41 Benefit suspensions.

If the plan sponsor determines that the plan is or is expected to be insolvent for a plan year, the plan sponsor shall suspend benefits to the extent necessary to reduce the benefits to the greater of the resource benefit level or the level of guaranteed benefits.
§ 4043.61 Advance reporting filing obligation. ( a ) *In general.* Unless a waiver or extension applies with respect to the plan, each contributing sponsor of a plan is required to notify PBGC no later than 30 days before the effective date of a reportable event described in this subpart C if the contributing sponsor is subject to advance reporting for the reportable event. If there is a change in contributing sponsor, the responsibility for any failure to file or defective filing lies with the person who is the contributing sponsor of the plan on the notice date.
( b ) *Persons subject to advance reporting.* A contributing sponsor of a plan is subject to the advance reporting requirement under paragraph (a) of this section for a reportable event if — ( 1 ) On the notice date, neither the contributing sponsor nor any member of the plan's controlled group to which the event relates is a public company; and
( 2 ) The aggregate unfunded vested benefits, determined in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, are more than $50 million; and
( 3 ) The aggregate value of plan assets, determined in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, is less than 90 percent of the aggregate premium funding target, determined in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Funding determinations.* For purposes of paragraph (b) of this section, the aggregate unfunded vested benefits, aggregate value of plan assets, and aggregate premium funding target are determined by aggregating the unfunded vested benefits, values of plan assets, and premium funding targets (respectively), as determined in accordance with part 4006 of this chapter for purposes of the variable-rate premium for the plan year preceding the effective date of the event, of plans maintained (on the notice date) by the contributing sponsor and any members of the contributing sponsor's controlled group, disregarding plans with no unfunded vested benefits (as so determined).
( d ) *Shortening of 30-day period.* Pursuant to § 4043.3(d), PBGC may, upon review of an advance notice, shorten the notice period to allow for an earlier effective date.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-10869

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00001-MW-GRJ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SAMUEL J. CUSUMANO, JR.,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

________________________

(April 28, 2017)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Robert A. “Gus” Harper III, appointed counsel for Samuel J. Cusumano, Jr.,

in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation 

Case: 16-10869 Date Filed: 04/28/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s 

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent 

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s 

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cusumano’s conviction and sentence are 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 16-10869 Date Filed: 04/28/2017 Page: 2 of 2
#### § 2580.412-4 “Funds or other property” of a plan.

The affirmative requirement for bonding persons falling within the definition of administrator, officer or employee is applicable only if they handle “funds or other property” of the plan concerned. The term “funds or other property” is intended to encompass all property which is used or may be used as a source for the payment of benefits to plan participants. It does not include permanent assets used in the operation of the plan such as land and buildings, furniture and fixtures or office and delivery equipment used in the operation of the plan. It does include all items in the nature of quick assets, such as cash, checks and other negotiable instruments, government obligations and marketable securities. It also includes all other property or items convertible into cash or having a cash value and held or acquired for the ultimate purpose of distribution to plan participants or beneficiaries. In the case of a plan which has investments, this would include all the investments of the plan even though not in the nature of quick assets, such as land and buildings, mortgages, and securities in closely held corporations. However, in a given case, the question of whether a person was “handling” such “funds or other property” so as to require bonding would depend on whether his relationship to this property was such that there was a risk that he, alone or in connivance with others, could cause a loss of such “funds or other property” through fraud or dishonesty.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Triad Hospitals, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James D. Shelton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ JAMES D. SHELTON   
|James D. Shelton       
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 8, 2006         

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 4901.1 Purpose and scope.

This part contains PBGC's general rules implementing the Freedom of Information Act. This part sets forth generally the categories of records accessible to the public, types of records subject to prohibitions or restrictions on disclosure, and procedures whereby members of the public may access and inspect PBGC records.

[87 FR 43994, July 25, 2022]
Exhibit 32.2 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Triad Hospitals, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Burke W. Whitman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ Burke W. Whitman

Burke W. Whitman 

Chief Financial Officer 

August 6, 2004 

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**SECTION      32.0**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period covered by the                Report. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                Michael H. Head              |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Michael                H. Head                       |
|   | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                                 |
|   |                                                 |
|   |                                                 |
|   | /s/                George J. Smith              |
|   | George                J. Smith                       |
|   | Treasurer                and Chief Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of LCNB Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Stephen P. Wilson, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve P. Foster, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|/s/ Stephen P. Wilson                     |  | /s/ Steve P. Foster                    
|----------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Stephen P. Wilson
Chief Executive Officer |  | Steve P. Foster
Chief Financial Officer





Date: August 1, 2005