34152 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 103 / Friday, May 26, 2000 / Notices

Issues To Be Addressed

Based on the cited considerations, the

Departments are seeking public

comment on the following questions:

1. Should a review process be adopted

and, if so, what kind of process should

be established?

2. If so, how could such a process be

integrated into the Commission’s

current licensing procedures in a timely

and efficient manner? To meet the

constraints of timeliness and resource

limitations, are changes needed in the

timing or implementation of various

steps in the agencies’—including the

Commission’s—existing regulations or

procedures? If not, then when should

the review process take place?

3. If, under any review process

mechanism, it were not possible to

avoid delaying the overall licensing

process, would it still be worth

establishing such a process?

4. Should the review process for

Section 4(e) and Section 18 be the same?

5. Who should be allowed to initiate

and/or participate in the review

process? Should it be limited to the

license applicant? Should it be limited

to formal parties (i.e., intervenors) to the

Commission’s licensing process (note

that, depending upon when the review

process takes place, there may not yet be

intervenors before the Commission)?

Should the opportunity be available to

anyone with an interest in the project?

6. Should the new process be

available for prescriptions and

conditions agreed upon pursuant to the

Commission’s streamlined alternative

licensing procedure—a process that

already provides considerable

opportunity for communication and

negotiation among the Departments and

other interested parties?

Alex Matthiessen,

Special Assistant to the Deputy Secretary,

U.S. Department of the Interior.

Andrew Rosenberg,

Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,

National Marine Fisheries Service, National

Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,

Department of Commerce.

[FR Doc. 00–13265 Filed 5–25–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–10–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Submission for OMB Review;

Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

The Department of Defense has

submitted to OMB for clearance, the

following proposal for collection of

information under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

chapter 35).

Title and OMB Number: Defense

Federal Acquisition Regulation

Supplement (DFARS) Appendix I, DoD

Pilot Mentor Prote ́ge

 ́ Program

Improvements; OMB Number 0704–

0412.

Type of Request: Extension.

Number of Respondents: 145.

Responses per Respondent: 1.

Annual Responses: 145.

Average Burden per Response: 3

hours.

Annual Burden Hours: 435 (145

reporting hours and 290 recordkeeping

hours).

Needs and Uses: The new information

collection required by Appendix I,

Policy and Procedures for the DoD Pilot

Mentor-Prote ́ge

 ́ Program, is required by

section 811 of the National Defense

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000

(Public Law 106–65). DoD will use the

information to assess whether the

purposes of the Pilot Mentor-Prote ́ge

 ́

Program have been attained and to

prepare the reports to Congress required

by section 811 of Public Law 106–65.

DFARS Appendix I requires a prote ́ge

 ́

firm to report on its progress under a

mentor-prote ́ge

 ́ agreement by concurring

with or rebutting its mentor firm’s yearend report. The prote ́

ge

 ́ firm also must

provide data on its employment,

revenues, and participation in Dod

contracts. The report is required

annually during the prote ́ge

 ́ firm’s

program participation term and for two

fiscal years after the expiration of the

program participation term.

Affected Public: Business or Other

For-Profit.

Frequency: Annually.

Respondent’s Obligation: Required to

Obtain or Retain Benefits.

OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Lewis W.

Oleinick.

Written comments and

recommendations on the proposed

information collection should be sent to

Mr. Oleinick at the Office of

Management and Budget, Desk Officer

for DoD (Acquisition), Room 10236,

New Executive Office Building,

Washington, DC 20503.

DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert

Cushing.

Written requests for copies of the

information collection proposal should

be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR,

1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite

1204, Arlington, VA 22202–4302.

Dated: May 22, 2000.

Patricia L. Toppings,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense,

[FR Doc. 00–13286 Filed 5–25–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–10–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Submission for OMB Review;

Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

The Department of Defense has

submitted to OMB for clearance, the

following proposal for collection of

information under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

chapter 35).

Title, Form Number, and OMB

Number: Pentagon Reservation Parking

Permit Application; DD Form 1199;

OMB Number 0704–0395.

Type of Request: Extension.

Number of Respondents: 10,000.

Responses per Respondent: 1.

Annual Responses: 10,000.

Average Burden per Response: 5

minutes.

Annual Burden Hours: 833.

Needs and Uses: The information

collection requirement is necessary for

the administration and management of

the Pentagon’s parking control program,

which is designed to meet the

government mandated car pool program.

Respondents are Department of Defense

and non-DoD personnel who utilize

designated parking areas on the

Pentagon Reservation. The Pentagon

Reservation Parking Permit Application,

DD Form 1199, is a machine read form

that includes information, such as

name, rank or grade, Social Security

Number (SSN), and vehicle license plate

number, required for the issuance and

control of the parking permit. The DD

Form 1199 is scanned into a

computerized database designed for the

administration of the Pentagon’s parking

control program. Each member of a

Pentagon Reservation authorized car

pool or individual parking permit

holder is required to complete and

submit the DD Form 1199 upon initial

application and annually thereafter.

Affected Public: Individuals or

Households.

Frequency: On Occasion; Annually.

Respondent’s Obligation: Required to

Obtain or Retain Benefits.

OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C.

Springer.

Written comments and

recommendations on the proposed

information collection should be sent to