alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

f(vou make changes to the ralues i11 the table below. you mustl!n.wre the totuls update occordingly. [l 

they c/o not, click (or Tab) into and then out oft he changed c:e/1. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action 

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) 

Do no (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet t include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Access (both struts) 2.0 · .. 17n o~ - '· 54 ' I• 

Close (both struts) 2.0 'I) 'I" II 54 r 

Part 1: 

GVI Inspe ction, 0.5 "' .., f ! "'\fi 54 ' .. . ,p 

Fig 1 - Left Strut 

Part 1: 

GVI Inspection, 0.5 ' I? o;n '· j ~ -\ J ~ 54 . ' I ( 

Fig 4 - Right Strut 

' (}.Ill J fJ p,l fl 1/'! 

... n nn , . II~~ {l 'IU 

tl,!liJ \ 1 I fill II •!II 

\ i l l \ ll IH! (' 1(0 

' d \)1 ; L~ I il ![) 

) ~ 'r l " ' ' I II) 

(J (II I} 11 I·) 

' 0 {t\1 (1 l!{l _Q1'0 

' I' (H H.~;~ il•)f1 

'; fl 0• ·, li Ill) '! 

' O.tlO ''"' '. ,, ~ !).{ I(J ' _ii.IJ'! 'I 

.... o nn ., i) Oil i,q 

!l.t'l' ' il i'H 1: (!I 

·, I J.li1l " (l,r •tl ·' I' ()• I 

.... () lli ' . on / I qp 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $22,950 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: ., 

Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product Action (include access, (@$85/hour) (e.g., Inspection, testing, and close- replacement) up) 
Part 2: 

DET Inspection 

(8.0 hrs) 

Fig 2 - Left Strut 

Fig 5 - Right Strut 

16.0 ' 1)11 t I I '•' ' 

Clean and restore 

sealant, primer and 

leveling compound 

(8.0 hrs) 

Part 2: Check Drain 

Lines (including 5.0 ' I 

cleaning or 

replacing) 

Part 3: 

DETand HFEC 

Inspection (8.0 hrs) 

Fig 3 - Left Strut 

Fig 6 - Right Strut 16.0 ~.I ~(11 ( i) . , lli 

Clean and restore 

sealant, primer and 

leveling compound 

(8.0 hrs) 

Pati 3: Check Drain 

Lines (including 5.0 '\ l •,(,> I I ·-. ,. cleaning or 

replacing) 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? - · 

YES* D NO [gl 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ~ 

YES* D NO [gl 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. · 

YESO NO~ 

Explanation: 
Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransp01tation? • 

YES* D NO IZI 

*Explanation:
#### § 500.141 Concurrent actions.

The taking of any one of the actions referred to in § 500.140 shall not be a bar to the concurrent taking of any other action authorized by the Act and these regulations.
#### § 452.103 Primary elections.

The fifteen-day election notice provision applies to a “primary election” at which nominees are chosen. Likewise, the fifteen-day election notice requirement applies to any runoff election which may be held after an inconclusive election. However, a separate notice would not be necessary if the election notice for the first election advises the members of the possibility of a runoff election and specifies such details as the time and place of such runoff election as may be necessary.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
iVillage Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2003, the undersigned, Scott
Levine, Chief Financial Officer of iVillage Inc., hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1)      such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
                  31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
                  10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of iVillage Inc.


May 15, 2003                                          /s/ Scott Levine
------------                                          -----------------------
Date                                                  Scott Levine
                                                      Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to iVillage Inc. and will be
retained by iVillage Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 4204.11 Variance of the bond/escrow and sale-contract requirements. ( a ) *General rule.* A purchaser's bond or escrow under section 4204(a)(1)(B) of ERISA and the sale-contract provision under section 4204(a)(1)(C) are not required if the parties to the sale inform the plan in writing of their intention that the sale be covered by section 4204 of ERISA and demonstrate to the satisfaction of the plan that at least one of the criteria contained in § 4204.12 or § 4204.13(a) is satisfied.
( b ) *Requests after posting of bond or establishment of escrow.* A request for a variance may be submitted at any time. If, after a purchaser has posted a bond or placed money in escrow pursuant to section 4204(a)(1)(B) of ERISA, the purchaser demonstrates to the satisfaction of the plan that the criterion in either § 4204.13 (a)(1) or (a)(2) is satisfied, then the bond shall be cancelled or the amount in escrow shall be refunded. For purposes of considering a request after the bond or escrow is in place, the words “the year preceding the date of the variance request” shall be substituted for “the date of determination” for the first mention of that term in both § 4204.13 (a)(1) and (a)(2). In addition, in determining the purchaser's average net income after taxes under § 4204.13(a)(1), for any year included in the average for which the net income figure does not reflect the interest expense incurred with respect to the sale, the purchaser's net income shall be reduced by the amount of interest paid with respect to the sale in the fiscal year following the date of determination.
( c ) *Information required.* A request for a variance shall contain financial or other information that is sufficient to establish that one of the criteria in § 4204.12 or § 4204.13(a) is satisfied. A request on the basis of either § 4204.13 (a)(1) or (a)(2) shall also include a copy of the purchaser's audited (if available) or (if not) unaudited financial statements for the specified time period.
( d ) *Limited exemption during pendency of request.* Provided that all of the information required to be submitted is submitted before the first day of the first plan year beginning after the sale, a plan may not, pending its decision on the variance, require a purchaser to post a bond or place an amount in escrow pursuant to section 4204(a)(1)(B). In the event a bond or escrow is not in place pursuant to the preceding sentence, and the plan determines that the request does not qualify for a variance, the purchaser shall comply with section 4204(a)(1)(B) within 30 days after the date on which it receives notice of the plan's decision.
( e ) *Method and date of issuance.* The PBGC applies the rules in subpart B of part 4000 of this chapter to determine permissible methods of issuance under this subpart. The PBGC applies the rules in subpart C of part 4000 of this chapter to determine the date that an issuance under this subpart was provided.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1212-0021) [61 FR 34084, July 1, 1996, as amended at 68 FR 61355, Oct. 28, 2003]
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T E S P E R AN Z A R UV AL C AB ASAND OV AL, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 70298 A ge nc yN o. A 078- 650- 226 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E s pe r anz aR uva l c aba - S andova l , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

or r e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h e rm o tio n to r e o p e n r e m o v a l p r o c e e d in g s . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e 

# FI LED SEP 30 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 70298 2 r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n , H

e v . G on zales , 50 1 F . 3d 11 28 , 11 30 -31 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 7 ) , an dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B IA d idn o t ab u se it s d iscr etio n ind en yin g R u v alcab a- S an d o v al’s m ot i on t o reopen as unt i m el y w here i tw as fi l ed ov eron e y ear a ft erthe B IA ’ s f i nal o r d e r , se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 0 0 3 . 2 (c)(2 ), an dR u v al cab a-S an d o v al fai l edt o est ab l i sh c hange d c i r c um s t anc e s i n M e xi c o t o qua l i f yf orthe r e gul a t orye xc e pt i on t o the tim e lim ita tio n , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; se e al so T ou f i gh iv. Mukasey , 538 F .3 d9 8 8 , 9 9 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( e v id e n c e m u s t d e m o n s tr a te p r im af a c ie e lig ib ility for r el i ef i n o rdert o reopen p roce edi ng s bas ed on changed ci rc um st ance s) . R uv al caba-S ando val ’ s c on t ent i on s thatthe B IA fa i l ed t o app l y the corre ct l e ga l s t andar d and di d notc ons i de rthe f a c t s ar e be l i e d bythe r e c or d. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 4, 2022

NO. 03-21-00551-CV

T. S. A., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 421ST DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on October 6, 2021. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
#### In the Matter of Ronald Crumpley, Appellant, v Renate Wack, as Director of the Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Center, et al., Respondents. (And Another Proceeding.)

Submitted August 14, 1995;

decided September 7, 1995

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as (1) reversed the order of Supreme Court dated April 27, 1994 denying respondents’ motion to dismiss appellant’s application for rehearing and review of Supreme Court’s August 25, 1993 retention order, and (2) dismissed the application, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
1

Filed 11/26/13 P. v. BearquiverCA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

SONNY JAMES BEARQUIVER,

Defendant and Appellant.

C073750

(Super. Ct. No. CRF120306)

Appointed counsel for defendant Sonny James Bearquiver has asked this court to 

review the record to determine whether there exist any arguable issues on appeal. 

(People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) We find no errors and shall affirm the 

judgment.
2

BACKGROUND

On December 25, 2011, defendant Sonny James Bearquiver threatened his 

girlfriend with death when she told him to move out of her home. She feared that he 

would harm her. In 1989, defendant was convicted of robbery.

Defendant entered a negotiated plea of no contest to criminal threats (Pen. Code, 

§ 422, count 2) and admitted a strike prior (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12) in 

exchange for a stipulated sentence of four years in state prison and the dismissal of the 

remaining counts and allegations. The court sentenced defendant accordingly.

Defendant appeals. He did not obtain a certificate of probable cause (Pen. Code, 

§ 1237.5).

DISCUSSION

Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this 

court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. 

(Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a 

supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 

days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant.

We note an error in preparation of the abstract of judgment. The abstract 

erroneously reflects that defendant committed count 2 in 2012. Defendant committed his 

offense in December 2011. We will direct the trial court to correct the abstract

accordingly.

Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error 

that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed. The trial court is directed to prepare a corrected 
3

abstract of judgment and forward a certified copy to the Department of Corrections and 

Rehabilitation.

 DUARTE , J.

We concur:

 NICHOLSON , Acting P. J.

 HOCH , J.
# L_2014188DE.01008801.xml

| 27.6.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 188/88 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 188/88

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2000/29/EG des Rates vom 8. Mai 2000 über Maßnahmen zum Schutz der Gemeinschaft gegen die Einschleppung und Ausbreitung von Schadorganismen der Pflanzen und Pflanzenerzeugnisse

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 169 vom 10. Juli 2000
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 169 vom 10. Juli 2000

Seite 90, Anhang V Teil B Ziffer I Nummer 3 zweiter Gedankenstrich:

anstatt:

„Annona L., Cydonia Mill. Diospyros L., Malus Mill., Mangifera L., Passiflora L., Prunus L., Pyrus L., Ribes L. Syzygium Gaertn., und Vaccinium L., mit Ursprung in außereuropäischen Ländern.“

muss es heißen:

„Annona L., Cydonia Mill. Diospyros L., Malus Mill., Mangifera L., Passiflora L., Prunus L., Psidium L., Pyrus L., Ribes L. Syzygium Gaertn., und Vaccinium L., mit Ursprung in außereuropäischen Ländern.“

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            Certification Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Empyrean Bioscience, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
C. Adamany, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/  Richard C. Adamany

Richard C. Adamany
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
#### § 405.2 Annual report.

Every employer who in any fiscal year has made any payment, loan, promise, agreement, arrangement or expenditure of the kind described and required by section 203(a) of the Act to be reported, shall, as prescribed by the regulations in this part, file with the Office of Labor-Management Standards, within 90 days after the end of each of its fiscal years, a report signed by its president and treasurer, or corresponding principal officers, together with a true copy thereof, containing the detailed information required therein by section 203(a) of the Act and found by the Secretary under section 208 thereof to be necessary in such report.

[28 FR 14384, Dec. 27, 1963, as amended at 50 FR 31309, Aug. 1, 1985; 78 FR 8025, Feb. 5, 2013]
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of The Boyds Collection, Ltd. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jan L.Murley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1)                                      TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)                                      Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The BoydsCollection, Ltd. and will be retained by The Boyds Collection, Ltd. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 
| /s/ Jan L.  Murley       |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Jan  L. Murley           |
| Chief  Executive Officer |
| August 12,  2005    |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Triad Hospitals, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James D. Shelton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ JAMES D. SHELTON   
|James D. Shelton       
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 9, 2007            

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      10,842,803
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      10,528,981
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  9,753,329
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      83,039,952
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        80,480,070
<LOANS>                                    219,605,521
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,573,846
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             345,574,702
<DEPOSITS>                                 239,995,771
<SHORT-TERM>                                 8,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          4,039,768
<LONG-TERM>                                 20,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    28,484,366
<OTHER-SE>                                  45,054,798
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             345,574,702
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              8,834,310
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,904,335
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               205,198
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            11,943,843
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,770,588
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,491,349
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,452,494
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  120,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,487,931
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,392,614
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,207,614
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.75
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.14
<LOANS-NON>                                  3,126,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,454,373
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,752
<RECOVERIES>                                     4,225
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,573,846
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         3,573,846
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>