alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Application of Labor Legislation to the Fruit and Vegetable Canning and Preserving Industries

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Application of Labor Legislation to the Fruit and Vegetable Canning and Preserving Industries : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 176*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1940,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5449,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001063018
<NAME>                        ISG Resources, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               Jan-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 Dec-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                14,975,729
<ALLOWANCES>                                    170,000
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              17,217,886
<PP&E>                                        28,139,108
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,562,086
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               191,731,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         10,432,132
<BONDS>                                      110,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       100
<OTHER-SE>                                   27,524,116
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                191,731,736
<SALES>                                      83,048,721
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            117,292,575
<CGS>                                        51,878,447
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               103,401,535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             9,338,059
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,808,480
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,549,026
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      2,259,454
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-13-00117-CR

IN RE MICHAEL JON BAILEY

Original Proceeding

ORDER

Michael Jon Bailey filed a petition for writ of prohibition in this Court on April 

16, 2013. We dismissed his petition on May 2, 2013. See In re Bailey, No. 10-13-00117-

CR, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 5539 (Tex. App.—Waco May 2, 3013, orig. proceeding).

Bailey has now filed a document entitled, “Motion for Judicial Review and for 

Material Facts Findings and Conclusions of Law.” In this document, he complains that 

the Court dismissed his motion to proceed “informa pauperis,” that is, without the 

advance payment of cost, as “moot.” Whether Bailey could proceed without the 

advance payment of cost is moot because there is no relief we can grant Bailey because 

there are no appellate filing fees to be paid in this criminal proceeding. We cannot 
In re Bailey Page 2

grant an exemption from filing fees that are not owed. Further, we have dismissed this 

proceeding explaining why we have no jurisdiction. See In re Bailey, No. 10-13-00117-

CR, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 5539 (Tex. App.—Waco May 2, 3013, orig. proceeding). 

Likewise, we dismiss his Motion for Judicial Review and for Material Facts Findings 

and Conclusions of Law.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion dismissed

Order issued and filed May 23, 2013
§ 30.6 Establishment of utilization goals for race, sex, and ethnicity. ( a ) Where, pursuant to § 30.5, a sponsor is required to establish a utilization goal for a particular racial, sex, or ethnic group in a major occupation group in its apprenticeship program, the sponsor, working with the Registration Agency, must establish a percentage goal at least equal to the availability figure derived under § 30.5(c) for that major occupation group.
( b ) A sponsor's determination under § 30.5 that a utilization goal is required constitutes neither a finding nor an admission of discrimination.
( c ) Utilization goals serve as objectives or targets reasonably attainable by means of applying every good faith effort to make all aspects of the entire affirmative action program work. Utilization goals are used to measure the effectiveness of the sponsor's outreach, recruitment, and retention efforts.
( d ) In establishing utilization goals, the following principles apply: ( 1 ) Utilization goals may not be rigid and inflexible quotas, which must be met, nor are they to be considered either a ceiling or a floor for the selection of particular groups as apprentices. Quotas are expressly forbidden.
( 2 ) Utilization goals may not provide a sponsor with a justification to extend a preference to any individual, select an individual, or adversely affect an individual's status as an apprentice, on the basis of that person's race, sex, or ethnicity.
( 3 ) Utilization goals do not create set-asides for specific groups, nor are they intended to achieve proportional representation or equal results.
( 4 ) Utilization goals may not be used to supersede eligibility requirements for apprenticeship. Affirmative action programs prescribed by the regulations of this part do not require sponsors to select a person who lacks qualifications to participate in the apprenticeship program successfully, or select a less-qualified person in preference to a more qualified one.
Exhibit 10.3 FY2015






TWENTY-FIFTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This Twenty-Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of January 1, 2015, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("Employer") and John Hildebrandt ("Executive").


Recitals


		
	A)
	On June 1, 2001 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive.




		
	B)
	Said Employment Agreement has been amended on twenty-four prior occasions;




		
	C)
	Employer and Executive now desire to further amend the Employment Agreement, as set forth hereinbelow:






Agreement


1. Section 2.1 of the Agreement which provides:


		
	1.
	Salary.  For Executive’s services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $322,524 during each year of the Employment Term.  Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer’s normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine.


 
is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2015, to provide as follows:


		
	1.
	Salary.  For Executive’s services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $332,200 during each year of the Employment Term.  Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer’s normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine.




		
	1.
	All other terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain unaltered and fully effective.






Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.


EXECUTIVE                        EMPLOYER
PriceSmart, INC.


John Hildebrandt                    By:     _____________________            
Name:     Jose Luis Laparte    
		
	Its: 
	CEO and President
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

DtlCSOCMucN 

--- 

Donorable &me8 E. KU&y, Director, page 3 

aertiflcate .of public eontehleZW8 and aeoe88ity 

i88Ued by the Railroad Comtni88ion; and that when 

the ?Iighvay Department ha6 iB8Ued ths special p6rc 

ait above referred to, psrmltting the baullng of 

oveweight or Over81se or overlength COmWditie8, 

that the pe66ittee 18 authorized t0 haul 8uCh load 

over the highvays designated by the Blghvay Department . ' 

we Bl'e 6liClOShg B COPY Of thi.8 OpiJlio31, obvloarly th. 

- PefePred to la your letter. 

bbder the applicable statutes, Article 827a, Section 2, 

penal Code, and Article 6701.3, Vernon'8 Annotated Civil Stetutw, 

t&e duty Of and authority for i66U.i~ the80 8po1a1 pePdt8 18 

ve8ted in th6 State Eighvay Departmat. Pre8Umably in the adrtPi8tl'atiOh Of the80 a&8 proper pnd 8UffiCieZlt iIlVe8ti@i~ 

vi11 be made by the department before the 188uea~e of the pemit8. 

While Article 827a, Section 2, 6upra, enjoIn upon th8 

it$@lauaJ ~UFtWIlt the 6eQspOhBibility Of 86'eiI2g that the hati 

made Under 8nch pemit8 ahall b8 by the 68horte6t praatiaeble 

wllte," the Hlghuay Department may not enlarge upon aertiflcato 

tight8 a8 granted by the ~Railroad Com~i88ion, ex4ept a6 to route8 

to be traversed. It ~ay.not by the special pemslt authorise a - 

per806 to tranaport property for hire rho 1s ultbout authority 

to do 80 from the Railroad Comnia6ion, or authorire a servim3 to 

and from polntr not authorized by the Railroad Ctzimls~lon. 

In reply to your question one, you sbopld honor 8p8oial 

pemlts issued by the Hi&way Department even though the carrier 

is thereby anthorissd to traverse routes not lmluded in the 

certificate Issued by the Railroad Commission, provided the csrrle~, if not trarmportlng hi6 oyn property, ha8 authority from the 

Xtailroad Cw6is8ion to trBn6pOrt the ~property at hand from and to 

the points inYO1Vef.i. 

Xourguestlons tvo, thme and ionrare amrwered in the 

negati*e. 

If, uader your question five, the carrier posaesse8 a 

persilt from the Elghvay Department, and If the condition6 loentloned ln our ansver to question one are existeat, the camler 

should be permitted to proceed unmolested along the route contained in the permit from the HIghway Departmmt.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               5
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      673
<ALLOWANCES>                                        34
<INVENTORY>                                        377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,618
<PP&E>                                           1,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                     995
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,751
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,023
<BONDS>                                             68
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,361
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,751
<SALES>                                          8,090
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,090
<CGS>                                            6,889
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,001
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,686)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        15
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,671)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,671)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.48)


</TABLE>
#### § 453.3 Labor organizations within the coverage of section 502(a).

Any labor organization as defined in sections 3(i) and 3(j) of the Act[3] is a labor organization within the coverage of section 502(a) unless its property and annual financial receipts do not exceed $5,000 in value. The determination as to whether a particular labor organization is excepted from the application of section 502(a) is to be made at the beginning of each of its fiscal years on the basis of the total value of all its property at the beginning of, and its total financial receipts during, the preceding fiscal year of the organization.

###### Footnotes -
  453.3

[3] See part 451 of this chapter.
US EPA Region 5 

77 West Jackson Boulevard 

Chicago IL 60604-3507 

Subject: NPDES Small Vessel General Permit Section 401 State Water Quality Certification 

Dear Ms. Hyde: 

Enclosed is a copy of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) proposed conditional grant of the 

water quality certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act for the proposed EPA Small Vessel General 

Permit (sVGP). Please accept WDNR's proposed certification as our response to EPA's letter, received December 8, 2011. 

As required under ch. NR 299, Wis. Adm. Code, the certification is being public noticed for 30 days. WDNR's 

determination shall become final upon expiration of the 30-day notice period if no person requests a contested case 

hearing. We will inform EPA shortly after the conclusion of the notice period whether a contested case hearing was 

requested, or if the certification became final and EPA may issue the sVGP for Wisconsin. 

In all cases where potential water uses are in conflict, water quality standards shall protect the general public 

interest. With this conditional certification, the EPA sVGP will be accepted by WDNR as achieving Wisconsin's 

water quality standards inch. NR 102 through ch. NR 105, Wis. Adm. Code. 

If you have any questions on our certification, please contact Susan Sylvester, Bureau of Water Quality Director, at 

608-266-1099, or e-mail Susan.Sylvester@Wisconsin.gov. 

Ken Johnson, Administrator Water Division 

Enclosure: Section 401 Water Quality Certification 

Cc: Susan Sylvester- WQ/3 

dnr.wi.gov 

wisconsin.gov Naturally WISCONSIN ON RECYCLED PAPER =-··
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 173 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 173

        Designating August 11, 2007, as ``National Marina Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2007

Ms. Stabenow submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

                              June 7, 2007

                Reported by Mr. Leahy, without amendment

                             June 20, 2007

                        Considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
        Designating August 11, 2007, as ``National Marina Day''.

Whereas the citizens of the United States highly value recreation time and their 
        ability to access 1 of the greatest natural resources of the United 
        States, its waterways;
Whereas, in 1928, the word ``marina'' was used for the first time by the 
        National Association of Engine and Boat Manufacturers to define a 
        recreational boating facility;
Whereas the United States is home to over 12,000 recreational boating facilities 
        that contribute substantially to their local communities by providing 
        safe, reliable gateways to boating for members of their communities and 
        welcomed guests;
Whereas marinas of the United States also serve as stewards of the environment, 
        actively seeking to protect their surrounding waterways not only for the 
        enjoyment of the current generation, but for generations to come; and
Whereas marinas of the United States also provide their communities and visitors 
        a place where friends and families, united by a passion for the water, 
        can come together for recreation, rest, and relaxation: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commemorates the marinas of the United States for 
        providing environmentally friendly gateways to boating for the 
        citizens of, and the visitors to the United States; and
            (2) designates August 11, 2007, as the sixth annual 
        ``National Marina Day'' in order--
                    (A) to honor the marinas of the United States for 
                their many contributions to their local communities; 
                and
                    (B) to make citizens, policy makers, elected 
                officials, and employees more aware of the overall 
                contributions marinas make to their well-being.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 10.82**

 

 

 

**MODIFICATION OF SECUREDPROMISSORY NOTE**

 

 

            WHEREAS, this agreement is in reference to a loan whichis evidenced by an instrument entitled Secured Promissory Note (NOTE), datedMarch 16, 2001 executed by LEE PHARMACEUTICALS for the originalprincipal sum of One Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($100,000.00)and payable to the order of PREFERRED BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.

 

            Principal balance outstanding on this Note as of thisdate is Sixty Five Thousand One Hundred Seventy Two & 00/100 Dollars ($65,172.00).

 

            NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by the undersigned partiesthat the Note shall be amended in the following respect:

 

 

 

The Note shall have anadditional advance of Thirty Four Thousand and 00/100 Dollars $34,000.00)

 

Principal shall bepayable in monthly installments of Five Thousand One Hundred Sixty Six &00/100 Dollars ($5,166.00) commencing on September 1, 2001.

 

 

 

            Except as noted above, all the terms, conditions andprovisions of said Note shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

 

 

 

| Date:                            |   | August 1, 2001            |   | Loan Number:  |   | LEE07                     |
|----------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|--------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                             |   |                      |   |               |   |                      |
| PREFERRED BUSINESS  CREDIT, INC. |   | LEE PHARMACEUTICALS       |
| a California  corporation        |   | a California  corporation |
|                             |   |                      |   |               |   |                      |
|                             |   |                      |   |               |   |                      |
|                             |   |                      |   |               |   |                      |
| By:                              |   | FARHAD MOTIA              |   | By:                |   | RONALD G. LEE             |
|                             |   | Farhad Motia,  President  |   |               |   | Ronald G. Lee,  President |
|                             |   |                      |   |               |   |                      |
|                                  |        |                           |        |                    |        |                           |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(77 South. 1003)

#### MEADOWS v. STATE.

(6 Div. 320.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Dec. 18, 1917.)

Appeal from Criminal Court, Jefferson County; A. H. Alston, Judge.

W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 2570.167 Summary decision. For 502(c)(8) civil penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.41 of this title. ( a ) *No genuine issue of material fact.* ( 1 ) Where no issue of a material fact is found to have been raised, the administrative law judge may issue a decision which, in the absence of an appeal pursuant to §§ 2570.169 through 2570.171 of this subpart, shall become a final order.
( 2 ) A decision made under paragraph (a) of this section shall include a statement of: ( i ) Findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the reasons therefor, on all issues presented; and
( ii ) Any terms and conditions of the rule or order.
( 3 ) A copy of any decision under this paragraph shall be served on each party.
( b ) *Hearings on issues of fact.* Where a genuine question of a material fact is raised, the administrative law judge shall, and in any other case may, set the case for an evidentiary hearing.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7104
ROGER LEWIS SMYRE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CR-93-36-MU, CA-96-163-5-MU) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 30, 1997 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roger Lewis Smyre, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Smyre v. United States , Nos. CR-93-36-MU; CA-96-163-5-MU (W.D.N.C. July 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 575.7 Statutory conditions for employment under the waiver. Any waiver granted pursuant to section 13(c)(4) of the Act and this part shall require that: ( a ) Employment of 10 and 11 year old minors pursuant to the waiver be outside school hours.
( b ) Individuals employed commute daily from their permanent residence to the farms(s) or field(s) where employed.
( c ) Such individuals be employed for not more than 8 weeks between June 1 and October 15 of any calendar year. When schools are in session, any employment under a waiver shall be confined to outside of school hours.