alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Industrial Home Work in Rhode Island: With Special Reference to the Lace Industry

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					,	Byrne, Harriet A. (Harriet Anne), 1892-					 and 	Blair, Bertha. 						*Industrial Home Work in Rhode Island: With Special Reference to the Lace Industry : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 131*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1935,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5421,			accessed on September 12, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
# Official Journal C 265/28 O

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 265 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4728 October 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 265

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4728 October 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 265/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 265/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3598 — REPSOL/BOREALIS POLÍMEROS) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 2 |
| 2004/C 265/3 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3420 — GIMD/SOCPRESSE) (1) | 3 |
| 2004/C 265/4 | Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures | 4 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 265/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 265/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3598 — REPSOL/BOREALIS POLÍMEROS) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

2

2004/C 265/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3420 — GIMD/SOCPRESSE) (1)

3

2004/C 265/4

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 4231.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *General* — ( 1 ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this part is to prescribe notice requirements under section 4231 of ERISA for mergers and transfers of assets or liabilities among multiemployer pension plans. This part also interprets the other requirements of section 4231 of ERISA and prescribes special rules for de minimis mergers and transfers.
( 2 ) *Scope.* This part applies to mergers and transfers among multiemployer plans where all of the plans immediately before and immediately after the transaction are multiemployer plans covered by title IV of ERISA.
( b ) *Additional requirements.* Subpart B of this part sets forth the additional requirements for and procedures specific to a request for a facilitated merger.
#### § 453.23 Persons becoming subject to bonding requirements during fiscal year.

Considering the purpose of section 502, the language of the prohibition should be considered to apply to persons who because of election, employment or change in duties begin to handle funds or other property during the course of a particular fiscal year. Bonds should be secured for such persons, in an amount based on the funds handled by their predecessors during the preceding fiscal year, before they are permitted to engage in any of the fund-handling activities referred to in the prohibition, unless coverage with respect to such persons is already provided by bonds in force meeting the requirements of section 502(a).
132 STAT. 1526 PUBLIC LAW 115–199—JULY 20, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S.J. Res. 60: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

May 17, considered and passed Senate. 

June 28, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–199 

115th Congress 

Joint Resolution 

Providing for the reappointment of Barbara M. Barrett as a citizen regent of 

the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), 

the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, 

in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by reason 

of the expiration of the term of Barbara M. Barrett of Arizona 

on January 10, 2019, is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent. The reappointment is for a term of 6 years, beginning on 

the later of January 11, 2019, or the date of the enactment of 

this joint resolution. 

Approved July 20, 2018. 

Time period. 

Effective date. 

July 20, 2018 

[S.J. Res. 60]
#### § 452.43 Representative categories.

In the case of a position which is representative of a unit defined on a geographic, craft, shift, or similar basis, a labor organization may by its constitution or bylaws limit eligibility for candidacy and for holding office to members of the represented unit. For example, a national or international labor organization may establish regional vice-presidencies and require that each vice-president be a member of his respective region. This kind of limitation would not be considered reasonable, however, if applied to general officers such as the president, vice-president, recording secretary, financial secretary, and treasurer. If eligibility of delegates to a convention which will elect general officers is limited to special categories of members, all such categories within the organization must be represented.
#### Harry Dowret, Respondent, *v.*Brooklyn and Queens Transit Corporation, Appellant.

Submitted January 20, 1937;

decided March 9, 1937.

*549
      *Andrew F. Van Thun, Jr.,*and *George D. Yeomans*for appellent.

*Thomas A. Shaw*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: Hubbs, J.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 103 (Friday, May 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13201]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6705-5]

Gulf of Mexico Program Focus Team Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting of the Gulf of Mexico Program (GMP) focus 
teams.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Act, Public Law 92463, EPA gives 
notice of a comprehensive meeting of GMP Focus Teams (Public Health, 
Nutrient Enrichment, Habitat, and Nonindigenous Species).

DATES: The Comprehensive Meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 20, 
2000, from 10 p.m. to 5 p.m. and on Wednesday, June 21, 2000, from 9 
a.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Hilton New Orleans 
Riverside, Poydras at the Mississippi River, New Orleans, LA (504) 561-
0500.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gloria D. Car, Designated Federal 
Officer, Gulf of Mexico Program Office, Building 1103, Room 202, 
Stennis Space Center, MS 39529-6000 at (228) 688-2421.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposed agenda items will include: Focus 
Team Development of FY2001 Performance Goal Recommendations and 
Supporting Strategies, Overview of FY2000 Workplan Process and 
Accomplishments, Briefing on FY2001 Workplan Schedule, and Review of 
Focus Team Roles and Responsibilities.
    The meeting is open to the public.

    Dated: May 17, 2000.
Gloria D. Car,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-13201 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
128 STAT. 1724 PUBLIC LAW 113–130—JULY 25, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 272: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 159 (2013): Nov. 18, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 160 (2014): July 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–130 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense joint 

outpatient clinic to be constructed in Marina, California, as the ‘‘Major General 

William H. Gourley VA–DOD Outpatient Clinic’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NAME OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AND 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE JOINT OUTPATIENT CLINIC, 

MARINA, CALIFORNIA. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Affairs and 

Department of Defense joint outpatient clinic to be constructed 

at the intersection of the proposed Ninth Street and the proposed 

First Avenue in Marina, California, shall be known and designated 

as the ‘‘Major General William H. Gourley VA–DOD Outpatient 

Clinic’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, regulation, map, 

document, record, or other paper of the United States to the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense joint outpatient clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be 

a reference to the ‘‘Major General William H. Gourley VA–DOD 

Outpatient Clinic’’. 

Approved July 25, 2014. 

July 25, 2014 

[H.R. 272] 


srobinson on DSKB307YQ1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
§ 500.0 Introduction. ( a ) The Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act (MSPA), hereinafter referred to as MSPA or the Act, repeals and replaces the Farm Labor Contractor Registration Act of 1963, as amended, hereinafter referred to as FLCRA or the Farm Labor Contractor Registration Act. Prior judgments and final orders obtained under FLCRA continue in effect as stated in § 500.4.
( b ) These regulations include provisions necessitated by the Immigration Reform and Control Act's (IRCA) amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). IRCA amended MSPA to remove section 106 thereof prohibiting the employment of illegal aliens. Matters concerning certificate actions or the assessment of civil money penalties, for a violation of section 106 of MSPA which occurred prior to June 1, 1987, continue through final administrative determination as stated in § 500.147.
[48 FR 36741, Aug. 12, 1983, as amended at 54 FR 13328, Mar. 31, 1989]
§ 520.411 Does a certificate authorizing payment of subminimum wages to messengers and/or learners remain in effect during the renewal process? ( a ) Application for renewal of a messenger and/or learner certificate shall be made on the same form as described in this section and employees shall be advised of such renewal application in the same manner as explained in § 520.405. No effective messenger and/or learner certificate shall expire until action on an application for renewal shall have been finally determined, provided that such application has been properly executed in accordance with the requirements, and filed with and received by the Administrator not less than fifteen nor more than thirty days prior to the expiration date. A final determination means either the granting of or initial denial of the application for renewal of a messenger and/or learner certificate, or withdrawal of the application. A “properly executed application” is one which contains the complete information required on the form, and the required certification by the applicant.
( b ) A renewal certificate will not be issued unless there is a clear showing that the conditions set forth in section 520.404 of this part still prevail.
#### FOLGER ADAM v. UNITED STATES

[No. 44230.

Decided May 7, 1945]

*770
      *Mr. Fred B. Rhodes*for plain till.

*Mr. 8. R.*Gamer, with whom was *Mr. Assistant Attorney General Francis M.*Shea, for defendant.

*775
      *Opinion*

*Per Curiam:*

The court has jurisdiction of the-claim. *The Kawneer*Company, *et al.,*v. *United*States, 100 C. Cls. 523.

The proof shows that plaintiff incurred increased labor-costs of $938.01 as a result of the enactment of the National Industrial Becovery Act, but the evidence fails to-show what amount of increased costs, if any, were incurred for material and overhead as a result of the enactment of that act.

Defendant says that plaintiff’s compliance with the National Industrial Act Code (finding 5) was so incomplete-that it would not be fair and equitable to allow it reimbursement under the act of June 25, 1938 for the increased-wages of $938.01 paid from February 1934, when plaintiff' subscribed to the Code and increased its hourly wage rates.

The history and purpose of the act of June 25,1938 show that the reason or cause for the increased cost, rather than full or substantial compliance with a Code, is the basis for reimbursement set forth in that act, which provides for entry of judgment “for increased costs incurred as a result of the enactment of the National Industrial Becovery Act.” *McCloskey & Company*v. *United States,*98 C. Cls. 90, 106-134. In *Consumers Paper Co.*v. *United*States, 94 C. Cls. 713, 720,. *776relied on by defendant, the increased wages claimed were not allowed for the period August 25,1933 to April 6,1934, ■because plaintiff had not satisfactorily proven that such in-urease resulted from the enactment of the National Industrial Eecovery Act. Here, however, the proof satisfactorily .shows that the increased wages paid in the amount of $938.01 resulted from the enactment of the act of June 16,1933, and the Code promulgated thereunder. Judgment is therefore •entered in favor of plaintiff for this amount. It is so ordered.
#### In the Matter of James M. Lee, Appellant, v Patricia B. Adduci, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, et al., Respondents.

Submitted June 19, 1995;

decided July 5, 1995

Appeal transferred, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, *sua sponte,*to the Appellate Division, First Department, upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie when questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [2]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]).
§ 38.93 Required elements of a conciliation agreement. A conciliation agreement must: ( a ) Be in writing;
( b ) Address the legal and contractual obligations of the recipient;
( c ) Address each cited violation;
( d ) Specify the corrective or remedial action to be taken within a stated period of time to come into compliance;
( e ) Provide for periodic reporting on the status of the corrective and remedial action;
( f ) State that the violation(s) will not recur;
( g ) State that nothing in the agreement will prohibit CRC from sending the agreement to the complainant, making it available to the public, or posting it on the CRC or recipient's Web site;
( h ) State that, in any proceeding involving an alleged violation of the conciliation agreement, CRC may seek enforcement of the agreement itself and shall not be required to present proof of the underlying violations resolved by the agreement; and
( i ) Provide for enforcement for a breach of the agreement.
----

Removal from the register of Case C-538/03 (1)

(2004/C 228/78)

By order of 24 June 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-538/03: Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany.

----

(1)OJ C 71 of 20.3.2004.

----
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 15 July 2004

in Case T-384/02: Fernando Valenzuela Marzo v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Officials - Pay - Installation allowance - Article 9(3) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Period of one year)

(2004/C 239/43)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-384/02: Fernando Valenzuela Marzo, an official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing at Brussels (Belgium), represented by M.–A. Lucas, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Curral and V. Joris, with an address for service in Luxembourg) - application for, first, annulment of the Commission's decisions of 16 November 2001 and 13 February 2002, refusing the applicant the second half of the installation allowance on the ground that his family did not settle at his place of employment within the period laid down in the regulations of one year from his taking up his post and, second, an order that the Commission pay him the second half of the installation allowance with interest thereon at an annual rate of 8 % - the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of J. Azizi, President, M. Jaeger and F. Dehousse, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 15 July 2004, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 55 of 8.3.2003.

----
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 262 

Designating July 2007 as ‘‘National Watermelon Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 29, 2007 

Mr. CHAMBLISS (for himself and Mr. ISAKSON) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 2007 as ‘‘National Watermelon Month’’. 

Whereas watermelon production constitutes an important sector of the agricultural industry of the United States; 

Whereas, according to the January 2006 statistics compiled 

by the National Agricultural Statistics Service of the 

United States Department of Agriculture, the United 

States produces 4,200,000,000 pounds of watermelon annually; 

Whereas watermelon is grown in 49 States, is purchased and 

consumed in all 50 States, and is exported to Canada; 

Whereas evidence indicates that eating 21⁄2 to 5 cups of fruits 

and vegetables daily as part of a healthy diet will improve 

health and protect against diseases such as cancer, high 

blood pressure, stroke, and heart disease; 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 262 IS 

Whereas proper diet and nutrition are important factors in 

preventing diseases such as childhood obesity and diabetes; 

Whereas watermelon has no fat or cholesterol and is an excellent source of the vitamins A, B6, and C, fiber, and potassium, which are vital to good health and disease prevention; 

Whereas watermelon is also an excellent source of lycopene; 

Whereas lycopene, an antioxidant found only in a few red 

plant foods, has been shown to reduce the risk of certain 

cancers; 

Whereas watermelon is a heart-healthy food that has qualified for the heart-check mark from the American Heart 

Association; 

Whereas watermelon has been a nutritious summer favorite 

from generation to generation; and 

Whereas it is important to educate citizens of the United 

States regarding the health benefits of watermelon and 

other fruits and vegetables: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘National 

3 Watermelon Month’’; 

4 (2) calls on the Federal Government, States, lo5 calities, schools, nonprofit organizations, businesses, 

6 other entities, and the people of the United States 

7 to observe the month with appropriate programs and 

8 activities; and 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 262 IS 

1 (3) designates July 2007 as ‘‘National Water2 melon Month’’. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4883 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide certain notice to 

a person filing a claim against the Department of Veterans Affairs 

for damage, injury, or death on Standard Form 95, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 10, 2020 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself and Mr. TILLIS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide certain 

notice to a person filing a claim against the Department 

of Veterans Affairs for damage, injury, or death on 

Standard Form 95, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Brian Tally VA Em5 ployment Transparency Act of 2020’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4883 IS

1 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS REQUIRE2 MENT TO PROVIDE CERTAIN NOTICE TO PER3 SONS FILING CLAIMS FOR DAMAGE, INJURY, 

4 OR DEATH ON STANDARD FORM 95. 

5 Not later than 30 days after the date on which a per6 son submits to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs a claim 

7 for damage, injury, or death on Standard Form 95, or 

8 any successor form, the Secretary shall provide to the 

9 claimant notice of each of the following: 

10 (1) The importance of obtaining legal advice, 

11 including a recommendation that the claimant 

12 should secure legal counsel. 

13 (2) The employment status of any individual 

14 listed on the form. 

15 (3) If the claim involves a contractor that en16 tered into an agreement with the Secretary, the im17 portance of obtaining legal advice as to the statute 

18 of limitations regarding the claim in the State in 

19 which the claim arose. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS