alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Kenneth R. Tolmie, certify that:

 

1.  I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended June 30,2003 of Starberrys Corporation, the registrant;

 

2.  Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.  Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)  designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)  evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 45 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the“Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)  presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;

 

5.  The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors:

 

a)  allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)  any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.  Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterlyreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
|                   | */s/*  *KENNETH R. TOLMIE*                |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: August 28, 2003 |                                           |
|                   | **Kenneth R. Tolmie  Chief Financial Officer** |

 

1

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1906

JOYCE E. ROWLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CITY OF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH; JOHN SMITHSON, City Manager; JOEL DAVIS, Assistant City Manager; KEVIN BLAYTON, Public Works Director; DOUGLAS MADDOCK, Planning and Development Director; individually and in their representative capacities as employees of the City North Myrtle Beach, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:06-cv-01873-TLW) Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 18, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joyce E. Rowley, Appellant Pro Se. Derwood Lorraine Aydlette, III, Christopher Wofford Johnson, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Joyce E. Rowley seeks to appeal the district court order consolidating her two cases and denying as moot several pending motions. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Rowley seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Rowley’s motion for stay of proceedings and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Eiropas Savienības C 294/2004

| | ISSN 1725-5201 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 294 |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 47. sējums2004. gada 30. novembris |

ISSN 1725-5201

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 294

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

47. sējums2004. gada 30. novembris

---

| Paziņojums Nr. | Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Informācija |
| | Komisija |
| 2004/C 294/1 | Galīgie Eiropas Kopienu gada pārskati – 2003. finanšu gads – Konsolidēti budžeta izpildes pārskati un konsolidēti finanšu pārskati | 1 |

Paziņojums Nr.

Saturs

Lappuse

I   Informācija

Komisija

2004/C 294/1

Galīgie Eiropas Kopienu gada pārskati – 2003. finanšu gads – Konsolidēti budžeta izpildes pārskati un konsolidēti finanšu pārskati

1

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

I Informācija

Komisija

| 30.11.2004 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 294/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2004

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 294/1

---

Galīgie Eiropas Kopienu gada pārskati – 2003. finanšu gads – Konsolidēti budžeta izpildes pārskati un konsolidēti finanšu pārskati

(2004/C 294/01)

Galīgie Eiropas Kopienu gada pārskati – 2003. finanšu gads – Konsolidēti budžeta izpildes pārskati un konsolidēti finanšu pārskati – nav tulkoti [latviešu, lietuviešu, igauņu, poļu, ungāru, čehu, slovāku, slovēņu, maltiešu valodās]. Tomēr pārskatu oriģināli angļu valodā ir pieejami elektroniskā formātā EUR-Lex tīmekļa vietnē, http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/JOIndex.do?ihmlang=en <http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/JOIndex.do?ihmlang=en>, Oficiālā Vēstneša2004. gada 30. novembra numurā C 294

---
(76 South. 999)

#### LITTLE v. STATE.

(7 Div. 446.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 5, 1917.)

Appeal from City Court of Gadsden; J. A. Bilbro, Judge.

W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of Attorney General.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [ID-010-0777-XQ] 

# AGENCY:

Lower Snake River District, Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Meeting notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Lower Snake River District Resource Advisory Council will meet in Boise. Potential agenda topics are the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Plan, the Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan for the U.S. Air Force                               ( print page 31597)                            Enhanced Training in Idaho project, sage grouse habitat management, implementation of rangeland standards and guidelines, off-highway vehicle management and other land management issues.                     

# DATES:

June 22, 2000. The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. Public comment periods will be held at 9:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Lower Snake River District Office, located at 3948 Development Avenue, Boise, Idaho. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Barry Rose, Lower Snake River District Office (208-384-3393). 

Dated: May 12, 2000. 

Howard Hendrick, 

District Manager. 

[FR Doc. 00-12490 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-84-P
[No. 27195-8-II.

Division Two.

October 25, 2002.]

#### *In the Matter of the Parentage of*Trevor Lewis Napoleon. Susan James, *Appellant,*v. Tamara Blackwell, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 96-5-50128-8, Christine A. Pomeroy, J., entered March 9, 2001. *Remanded*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Seinfeld and Bridgewater, JJ.
§ 4245.2 Definitions. The following terms are defined in § 4001.2 of this chapter: Employer, ERISA, IRS, multiemployer plan, nonforfeitable benefit, PBGC, person, plan, and plan year. In addition, for purposes of this part: *Actuarial valuation* means a report submitted to a plan of a valuation of plan assets and liabilities that is performed in accordance with subpart B of part 4281 of this chapter.
*Available resources* means available resources as described in section 4245(b)(3) of ERISA.
*Benefits subject to reduction* means those benefits accrued under plan amendments (or plans) adopted after March 26, 1980, or under collective bargaining agreements entered into after March 26, 1980, that are not eligible for PBGC's guarantee under section 4022A(b) of ERISA.
*Financial assistance* means financial assistance from PBGC under section 4261 of ERISA.
*Insolvency benefit level* means the greater of the resource benefit level or the benefit level guaranteed by PBGC for each participant and beneficiary in pay status.
*Insolvency year* means insolvency year as described in section 4245(b)(4) of ERISA.
*Insolvent* means unable to pay benefits when due during the plan year.
*Interested parties* means, with respect to a plan— ( 1 ) Employers required to contribute to the plan;
( 2 ) Employee organizations that, for collective bargaining purposes, represent plan participants employed by such employers; and
( 3 ) Plan participants and beneficiaries.
*Reasonably expected to enter pay status* means, with respect to plan participants and beneficiaries, persons (other than those in pay status) who, according to plan records, are disabled, have applied for benefits, or have reached or will reach during the applicable period the normal retirement age under the plan, and any others whom it is reasonable for the plan sponsor to expect to enter pay status during the applicable period.
*Resource benefit level* means resource benefit level as described in section 4245(b)(2) of ERISA.
[61 FR 34115, July 1, 1996, as amended at 84 FR 18724, May 2, 2019]
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**EXPRESS
      SYSTEMS CORPORATION**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**









In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Express Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Brown,
      Principal Accounting Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Director of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:







1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.










/s/
      Richard Brown


Richard
      Brown


Principal
      Accounting Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Director




February
      7, 2006
#### § 2580.412-34 General.

The purpose of section 13(c), as shown by its legislative history, is similar to a closely related provision contained in section 502(a) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (73 Stat. 536; 29 U.S.C. 502(a)). The fundamental purpose of Congress under 13(c) is to insure against potential abuses arising from significant financial or other influential interests affecting the objectivity of the plan or parties in interest in the plan and agents, brokers, or surety or other companies, in securing and providing the bond specified in section 13(a). As will be explained more fully below, this prohibition, however, was not intended to preclude the placing of bonds through or with certain parties in interest in plans which provide a variety of services to the plan, one of which is a bonding service.
<PAGE>


                                     ITEM 12

                 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                           Name & Address of                              Amount & Nature of
Title of Class             Beneficial Owner                              Beneficial Ownership       % of Class
--------------             -------------------                           ---------------------      ----------
                                                    ITEM 403(a)
                                                    -----------                                                             
<S>                        <C>                                           <C>                        <C>  
Class B                    Hussey Investments LP                              880,881                 51.0%
Common Stock               PO Box 35
                           Goshen IN 46527 (1) (2)

                                                    ITEM 403(b)
                                                    -----------

Class A                    Hussey Endeavors LP                              1,253,219                 56.7%
Common Stock               PO Box 35
                           Goshen IN 46527 (1) (2)


Class A                    Edward Joseph Hussey                             1,276,619                 57.8%
Common Stock               PO Box 35
Class B                    Goshen IN 46527 (2)
Common Stock                                                                  945,653                 54.7%


Class A                    Michael F. Hussey                                1,276,054                 57.8%
Common Stock               PO Box 35
Class B                    Goshen IN 46527 (2)
Common Stock                                                                  945,088                 54.7%


Class A                    All Directors and                                1,300,454                 58.9%
Common Stock               Officers as a Group
Class B                                                                     1,009,860                 58.3%
Common Stock

</TABLE>

(1)  Edward J. Hussey is a limited partner in both Hussey Investments LP and
     Hussey Endeavors LP and accordingly has a pecuniary interest in the shares
     of Class B Common Stock owned by Hussey Investments LP and Class A Common
     Stock owned by Hussey Endeavors LP. Edward J. Hussey has no voting or
     investment power over such shares and accordingly disclaims beneficial
     ownership of such shares.

(2)  Edward Joseph Hussey , Michael F. Hussey, John P. Hussey and Nancy A.
     Parrish are the general partners of Hussey Investments LP and general
     partners of Hussey Endeavors LP. Accordingly, they share voting and
     investment control over the 880,881 shares of Class B Common Stock owned by
     Hussey Investments LP and the 1,253,219 shares of Class A Common Stock
     owned by Hussey Endeavors LP. Total shares listed for individuals includes
     the beneficial ownership.




                                       32
Editorial Note on Part 6
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 6 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

§ 6.51 Referral to Chief Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) Referral pursuant to § 4.10 or § 4.11 of part 4 of this title will be by an Order of Reference from the Administrator to the Chief Administrative Law Judge, to which will be attached the material submitted by the applicant or any other material the Administrator considers relevant and, for proceedings pursuant to § 4.11 of this title, a copy of any findings of the Administrator. A copy of the Order of Reference and all attachments will be sent by mail to the following parties: The agency whose contract is involved, the parties to the collective bargaining agreement, any contractor or subcontractor performing on the contract, any contractor or subcontractor known to be desirous of bidding thereon or performing services thereunder who is known or believed to be interested in the determination of the issue, any unions or other authorized representatives of service employees employed or who may be expected to be employed by such contractor or subcontractor on the contract work, and any other affected parties known to be interested in the determination of the issue. The Order of Reference will have attached a certificate of service naming all interested parties who have been served.
( b ) Accompanying the Order of Reference and attachments will be a notice advising that any interested party, including the applicant, who intends to participate in the proceeding shall submit a written response to the Chief Administrative Law Judge within 20 days of the date on which the certificate of service indicates the Order of Reference was mailed. The notice will state that such a response shall include: ( 1 ) A statement of the interested party's case;
( 2 ) A list of witnesses the interested party will present, a summary of the testimony each is expected to give, and copies of all exhibits proposed to be proffered;
( 3 ) A list of persons who have knowledge of the facts for whom the interested party requests that subpoenas be issued and a brief statement of the purpose of their testimony; and
( 4 ) A certificate of service in accordance with § 6.3 of this title on all interested parties, including the Administrator.
#### In the Matter of Brown-Lipe Gear Company, Respondent, against Arthur M. Ferris et al., Constituting the Board of Assessors of the City of Syracuse, Appellants.

Argued October 1, 1937;

decided October 5, 1937.

*421
      *James C. Tormey, Corporation Counsel (A. M. Beach*of counsel), for appellants.

Chapter 449 of the Laws of 1935, authorizing the Board of Review of Taxes and Assessments of the city of Syracuse, is valid and con. stitutional and the second question submitted should be answered in the negative. *(Matter of Wendell*v. *Lavin,*246 N. Y. 115; *Matter of McAneny*v. *Board of Estimate,*232 N. Y. 377; *People ex rel. Chamberlain*v. *Forrest,*96 N. Y. 544; *Matter of Hermance*v. *Board of Supervisors,*71 N. Y. 481; *People ex rel. Citizens Lighting Co.*v. *Feitner,*81 App. Div. 118; *People ex rel. Simon*v. *Bradley,*207 N. Y. 592; *People ex rel. Met. St. Ry. Co.*v. *Tax Commrs.,*174 N. Y. 417; *Matter of Morgan*v. *Furey,*186 N. Y. 202; *People*v. *Pinckney,*32 N. Y. 377; *People ex rel. Welch*v. *Bard,*209 N. Y. 304.) The order appealed from is not proper as a matter of law and the first question submitted should be answered in the negative. *(Bannon*v. *Bannon,*270 N. Y. 484.)

*Maurice F. Lane*for respondent.

The order appealed from is proper as matter of law. *(Matter of Household Realty Corp.,*158 Misc. Rep. 667.) Chapter 449 of the *422Laws of 1935 establishing the Board of Review is unconstitutional and void. *(Household Realty Corp.*v. *Ferris,*158 Misc. Rep. 667; *Matter of Wendell*v. *Lavin,*246 N. Y. 115; *People v. Raymond,*37 N.Y. 428; *People ex rel. Met. St. Ry. Co.*v. *Tax Commrs.,*174 N. Y. 417; *People*v. *Pelham,*215 N. Y. 374; *Matter of Morgan*v. *Furey,*186 N. Y. 202; *Matter of Brenner,*170 N. Y. 185; *Devoy*v. *City of New York,*36 N. Y. 449.) Chapter 449 of the Laws of 1935 constitutes a delegation of administrative authority whichjs in violation of section 19 of article 6 of the New York Constitution. *(Matter of Richardson,*247 N. Y. 401; *People ex rel. Washington*v. *Nichols,*52 N. Y. 478; *Matter of Hathaway,*71 N. Y. 238; *People ex rel. Welch*v. *Bard,*209 N. Y. 304; *Matter of Davies,*168 N. Y. 89; *People*v. *Hall,*169 N. Y. 184; *Matter of Gilroy,*11 App. Div. 65; *Citizens Sav. Bank*v. *Town of Greenburgh,*173 N. Y. 215; *Matter of Wood,*2 Cow. 29; *Case of Supervisors of Election,*114 Mass. 247; *Board of Supervisors*v. *Todd,*97 Md. 247.)

*Per Curiam.*

We agree with the Appellate Division that the challenged statute (L. 1935, ch. 449) attempts to transfer to a board to be appointed by State officers essential functions theretofore belonging to the Assessors of the city of Syracuse and is, therefore, invalid. (N. Y. Const, art. X, § 2; *People*v. *Raymond,*37 N. Y. 428; *People ex rel. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co.*v. *State Board of Tax Commissioners,*174 N. Y. 417. See *Prescott*v. *Ferris,*251 App. Div. 113.) We pass on no other issue.

The order should be affirmed, without costs, and the questions certified answered in the affirmative.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.
Exhibit 15











Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.  20549



Commissioners:



We are aware that our report dated October 26, 2005 on our review of interim financial statements of LCNB Corp. and Subsidiaries (the "Company"), as of and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 and included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended, is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-8, filed on March 13, 2003.  Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.







/s/ J.D. Cloud & Co. L.L.P.



J.D. Cloud & Co. L.L.P.





Cincinnati, Ohio

October 26, 2005
EXHIBIT32.2

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Twin Faces East EntertainmentCorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), I, Stanley L. Teeple, Secretary/Treasurer andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/S/StanleyL. Teeple            
StanleyL. Teeple

Secretary/Treasurerand

ChiefFinancial Officer

 

May 21, 2004