alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.6


                                  Amendment No. 1
                                        to
                                Longview Fibre Company
                  Hourly Employees' 401(k) Savings Plan and Trust

     This Amendment is made to the Longview Fibre Company Hourly Employees'
401(k) Savings Plan and Trust (the "Plan").  The following amendments are
effective as of January 7, 2000.  All terms defined in the Plan shall have
the same meaning when used herein.  All provisions of the Plan not amended by
this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.

1. Section 7.3 is amended to read as follows:

       A Participant shall provide his or her initial investment election
       upon becoming a Participant and may change his or her election with
       respect to future contributions and/or reallocate his or her existing
       Account balances at such times, in such increments and subject to such
       rules and procedures as the Administrator shall establish.

2. The first sentence of Section 16.4 is amended by adding the following
clause at the end thereof:

   , subject to any rules and procedures established by the
   Administrator pursuant to Section 7.3.


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has caused this Amendment to be executed
on the date indicated below.

                                            LONGVIEW FIBRE COMPANY

Dated: January 20, 2000                     By: L. J. HOLBROOK
                                                L. J. HOLBROOK
                                            Its: Sr. VP-Finance

TRUSTEE APPROVAL

The Trustee hereby accepts and approves the amendments set forth above.

Dated:                                      MERRILL LYNCH TRUST COMPANY

                                            By:
                                            Its:
(77 South. 1003)

#### GUISE v. STATE.

(6 Div. 421.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 22, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Chas. W. Ferguson, Judge.

F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
[No. 49972-6-I.

Division One.

October 28, 2002.]

#### John Roman, *Appellant,*v. The Board of Tax Appeals, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 00-2-29703-3, Ann Schindler, J., entered November 30, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000057497
<NAME> THE LAMSON & SESSIONS CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-3-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,410
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     45,575
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,567
<PP&E>                                         111,211
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,882
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 162,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,580
<BONDS>                                         44,712
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,341
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,640
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   162,494
<SALES>                                        271,780
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,780
<CGS>                                          226,449
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  226,449
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,768
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,263)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,550
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,713)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (4,940)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,653)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.72)
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NICOLASA MENDOZA DE MARTINEZ, 

AKA Nicholasa Martinez, AKA Nicolasa 

Mendoza Peregrino, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 19-71611 

Agency No. A023-036-463 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 20, 2021**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Nicolasa Mendoza de Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro 

se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her

appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 28 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-71611 

asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture 

(“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for 

substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Garcia-Milian v. Holder, 755 

F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir. 2014). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition 

for review.

Mendoza de Martinez does not raise, and therefore waives, any challenge to 

the BIA’s determination that she failed to challenge the IJ’s denial of asylum. See 

Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 2013) (concluding 

petitioner waived challenge to issue not specifically raised and argued in the

opening brief).

Because the agency found Mendoza de Martinez removable due to her 

convictions for a crime involving moral turpitude and a crime related to a 

controlled substance, our jurisdiction to review the agency’s particularly serious 

crime determination is limited to colorable constitutional claims and questions of 

law. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C)-(D); Pechenkov v. Holder, 705 F.3d 444, 448-

49 (9th Cir. 2012). To the extent Mendoza de Martinez challenges the agency’s 

weighing of factors in its particularly serious crime determination, we lack 

jurisdiction to consider the contentions. See Pechenkov, 705 F.3d at 448-49. Thus, 

Mendoza de Martinez’s withholding of removal claims fail. See 8 U.S.C. §

1231(b)(3)(B); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(d)(2).
3 19-71611 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of deferral of removal 

under CAT because Mendoza de Martinez failed to show it is more likely than not 

she would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if 

returned to Mexico. See Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009). We 

reject as unsupported by the record Mendoza de Martinez’s contention that the 

agency failed to consider evidence or otherwise erred in its analysis of her claim. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>			12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                       155
<INVENTORY>                                      3,266
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,335
<PP&E>                                           1,990
<DEPRECIATION>                                     567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>				 3,861
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           172
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>			 6,880
<SALES>                                         30,203
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,203
<CGS>                                           28,078
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,001
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 196
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,017)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,017)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,017)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.47)
        


</TABLE>
#### § 452.64 Write-in votes.

The Act neither requires nor prohibits write-in candidacy or write-in votes. These matters are governed by appropriate provisions of the union's constitution and bylaws, applicable resolutions, or the established practice of the union.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of

HORIZON BANCORPORATION, INC.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc., hereby certifies that:

1. Horizon Bancorporation, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc.

/S/ Charles S. ConoleyCharles S. Conoley
President and Chief Executive Officer

November 13, 2003
EXHIBIT
32.2






Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






I, Rahul
Sen Gupta, Chief Financial Officer of Manas Petroleum Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:






(1) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September
30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and






(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:
February 25, 2008




/s/
Rahul Sen Gupta


Rahul Sen
Gupta


Chief
Financial Officer
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of  Intelligent Living Corp.(the "Company") On  Form  10-QSB  for  the period  ended  August 31, 2007 as  filed  with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Michael F. Holloran, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002,  that  to the  best  of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934;  and (2)  The  information contained in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Michael F. Holloran Michael F. Holloran Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer  October 22, 2007
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

I, James D. Durham, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Board of the
Registrant, Crdentia Corp., certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Crdentia Corp.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and we have:



(a) 	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



(b) 	evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and



(c) 	disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) 	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) 	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated:  August 8, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2399

MAJED SUBH,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, U.S. Army Records Managements & 

Declassification Agency, DA Freedom of Info and Privacy 

Office,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:10-cv-00433-LMB-TRJ)

Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: March 17, 2011

Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Majed Subh, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin J. Mikolashek, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Majed Subh appeals the district court’s order granting 

summary judgment to the Defendant in his civil action. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Subh v. Department of the Army, No. 1:10-cv-00433-LMB-TRJ (E.D. 

Va. Nov. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40384 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS BARAJAS-LEON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-93-ALL

- - - - - - - - - - December 12, 2001 Before HIGGINGBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus Barajas-Leon has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). BarajasLeon has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT (12)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIOS

(Dollars in thousands)                

                                                              Year Ended December 31
                                                      ----------------------------------------
                                           1998         1997         1996         1995         1994
                                           ----         ----         ----         ----         ----
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED
  CHARGES
<S>                                     <C>           <C>          <C>           <C>         <C>
Income before income taxes and
  cumulative effect of accounting
  change                                 $147,537     $148,153      $153,421     $128,196     $101,255
Dividends received, net of equity
  in earnings (loss) of
  unconsolidated affiliates                   887        1,605         9,961       (3,704)       1,213
Fixed charges                              43,552       46,034        41,712       31,762       30,249
                                         --------     --------      --------     --------     --------
Income before cumulative effect
  of accounting change for
  computation purposes                   $191,976     $195,792      $205,094     $156,254     $132,717
                                         ========     ========      ========     ========     ========

FIXED CHARGES
Interest expense, including interest
  related to corporate owned life
  insurance                              $ 33,313     $ 37,971      $ 34,963     $ 24,477     $ 22,582
Portion of rent expense representing
  interest                                  7,518        6,819         6,288        6,903        7,303
Amortization of debt expense and
  debt discount                             2,721        1,244           461          382          364
                                         --------     --------      --------     --------     --------
Total fixed charges                      $ 43,552     $ 46,034      $ 41,712     $ 31,762     $ 30,249
                                         ========     ========      ========     ========     ========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
  Charges                                    4.4x         4.3x          4.9x         4.9x         4.4x
                                         ========     ========      ========     ========     ========
</TABLE>

For the purpose of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, "earnings"
consist of income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting
change, plus fixed charges and dividends received, net of equity in earnings
(loss) of unconsolidated affiliates. Fixed charges consist of interest expense,
the portion of rent expense representing interest and amortization of debt
discount.


                                      -80-
----

ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ON SOCIAL SECURITY FOR MIGRANT WORKERS

Rates for conversion of currencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

(2004/C 271/04)

Article 107(1), (2), (3) and (4) of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

Reference period: October 2004

Application period: January, February and March 2005

----
Exhibit 32

| | Certifications
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

# Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of First Capital Bank Holding Corporation (the
Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ending September 30, 2003 as
          filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/ Michael G. Sanchez
Michael G. SanchezChief Executive OfficerNovember 13, 2003
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/ Timothy S. Ayers
Timothy S. AyersChief Financial OfficerNovember 13, 2003
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------