alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.14


 


Management Compensation Agreements


 


There
were no written agreements between the Company and its executive officers in 2014; however, there is an understanding that the
executive officers will devote the majority of their professional time and resources to achieving the goals of the Company. In
return, they earn a semi-monthly salary of $5,000 when the company’s cash-on-hand is sufficient to do so.
#### Nathaniel Paine, Judge of Probate, &c., *versus*Philip F. Cowdin *et al.*

Where an appeal from a decree of the Probate Court was granted by this Court (under *St,*1817, *c,*190, §8), on condition that the petitioner for the appeal should;' give a bond to pay costs, &c., and such bond was given, but the appeal was nevei entered and prosecuted, it was *held*that the decree was vacated by the appeal.

Debt on a probate bond given in behalf of Cowdin as administrator, to recover, for the benefit of Eliakim Davis and wife, the sum of $109-64, according to a decree of the Probate Court in May, 1825, with interest. Within one year from that time, (pursuant to *St.*1817, *c.*190, § 8,) Davis and wife petitioned this Court for leave to enter and prosecute an appeal from the decree, and at October term 1826, it was ordered that they should be allowed to enter an appeal, upon condition that they should, within thirty days, give bond with sureties to the judge of probate to pay costs, if the administrator should not be charged beyond the sum of $109-64. The bond was filed, in compliance with the above condition, but the appeal was never entered and prosecuted ; and Cow-din did not pay over the sum above mentioned.

*A. Rogers,*for the plaintiff,

cited *Campbell v. Howard,*5 Mass. R. 376 ; *Commonwealth*v. *Messenger,*4 Mass. R. 471 ; *Robbins*v. *Appleby,*2 N. Hampsh. R. 223.

*Torrey*and *Wood,*for the defendants.

*Per Curiam.*

If the order allowing the appeal had been unconditional, it would have vacated the decree ; and the. condition of the order having been performed by Davis and wife, the effect is the same as if the order had *been*unconditional. The decree being thus rendered inoperative, the neg lect of the administrator to comply with it was not a breach of his bond.

*Plaintiff nonsuit*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (IN THOUSANDS,
EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          26,235
<SECURITIES>                                    20,582
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,190
<ALLOWANCES>                                        74
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,795
<PP&E>                                           2,887
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (682)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,636
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,622
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           338
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,246
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,636
<SALES>                                          9,699
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,699
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,055
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,232)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,232)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,232)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)


</TABLE>
§ 26.2 General procedural matters. ( a ) *Definitions.* ( 1 ) *ARB* means the Administrative Review Board.
( 2 ) *Electronic case management system* means the Department of Labor's electronic filing and electronic service system for adjudications.
( b ) *Computing time.* ( 1 ) Unless a different time is set by statute, regulation, executive order, or judge's order, when computing a time period stated in days, ( i ) Exclude the day of the event that triggers the period;
( ii ) Count every day, including intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays; and
( iii ) Include the last day of the period, but if the last day is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.
( 2 ) Unless a different time is set by statute, regulation, executive order, or judge's order, the “last day” ends: ( i ) For electronic filing via the Department's electronic case management system or via other electronic means, at 11:59:59 Eastern Time on the due date.
( ii ) For non-electronic filing, at the time the office of the Clerk of the Appellate Boards is scheduled to close in Washington, DC on the due date.
( c ) *Mailing address.* The mailing address for the ARB is: Administrative Review Board, Clerk of the Appellate Boards, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20210.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00101-CV

Jesus S. Puente

v.

Secretary of the US Department of Veterans Affairs, An Officer of the United States by 

and through VRM (Vendor Resource Management), Duly Authorized Agent for the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021CCV-61583-5

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, vacates the trial court’s judgment and dismisses the case. The Court orders the 

judgment vacated and the case is DISMISSED. No costs are assessed as appellant 

filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 28, 2022
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Ari Muljana, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(a) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Manas Petroleum
      Corporation for the period ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|(b) | information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Manas Petroleum Corporation.                                                  

Date: August 13, 2010

/s/ Ari MuljanaAri MuljanaChief Financial
Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Diomed Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lisa Bruneau,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:    August 14, 2002           By:    /s/ Lisa Bruneau
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                          Lisa Bruneau
                                          Principal Financial Officer, Vice
                                          President, Finance, Secretary and
                                          Treasurer
#### § 452.32 Persons who may be candidates and hold office; secret ballot elections.

Section 401(e) provides that in any election of officers required by the Act which is held by secret ballot, every member in good standing with the exceptions explained in sections following shall be eligible to be a candidate and to hold office. This provision is applicable not only to the election of officers in local labor organizations, but also to elections of officers in national or international and intermediate labor organizations where those elections are held by secret ballot referendum among the members, and to the election of delegates to conventions at which officers will be elected.
Order entered March 15, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00038-CV

BASIL BROWN, Appellant

V.

ROBERT HAWKINS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court At Law No. 1

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 16C-0127

ORDER

Appellant has been declared a vexatious litigant. By letter dated January 29, 2019, we 

instructed appellant to file, by February 8, 2019, written verification that he has obtained an 

order from the local administrative judge permitting the filing of this appeal. See TEX. CIV.

PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.103(a). By order dated February 13, 2019, the Court granted 

appellant an extension of time to February 26, 2019.

Before the Court is appellant’s February 27, 2019 second motion requesting an extension 

of time to comply and appellee’s objection to the motion. In his motion, appellant asserts that he 

has been unable to comply because the local administrative judge “has been ill and away from 

the courthouse.” In his objection to the motion, appellee disputes the accuracy of the reason 

given for a further extension.
We GRANT appellant’s motion to the extent that appellant shall file, by March 25, 

2019, written verification that he has obtained an order from the local administrative judge 

permitting the filing of this appeal. See id. We caution appellant that no further extension will 

be granted and that failure to comply will result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
#### § 42.3 National Committee.

A National Farm Labor Coordinated Enforcement Committee (*National Committee*) is hereby established which shall be responsible for: Reviewing policies, guidelines and enforcement goals and strategies for the Department of Labor with respect to migrant farm labor-related enforcement efforts under the protective statutes; resolving policies which are in conflict between DOL agencies; advising the Secretary on legislative initiatives which would strengthen farm labor-related enforcement efforts; and providing guidance and recommendations to DOL agencies on related enforcement activities.
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

#### § 4.166 Wage payments—unit of payment.

The standard by which monetary wage payments are measured under the Act is the wage rate per hour. An hourly wage rate is not, however, the only unit for payment of wages that may be used for employees subject to the Act. Employees may be paid on a daily, weekly, or other time basis, or by piece or task rates, so long as the measure of work and compensation used, when translated or reduced by computation to an hourly basis each workweek, will provide a rate per hour that will fulfill the statutory requirement. Whatever system of payment is used, however, must ensure that each hour of work in performance of the contract is compensated at not less than the required minimum rate. Failure to pay for certain hours at the required rate cannot be transformed into compliance with the Act by reallocating portions of payments made for other hours which are in excess of the specified minimum.
#### § 525.20 Relation to other laws.

No provision of these regulations, or of any special minimum wage certificate issued thereunder, shall excuse noncompliance with any other Federal or State law or municipal ordinance establishing higher standards.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATE OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC. (REGISTRANT)
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, James A. Wylie,  Jr.,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Registrant,
certify to the best of my  knowledge  and  belief  pursuant  to  Section  906 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:

          (1)     The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
                  30, 2004,  which this  statement  accompanies,  fully complies
                  with  the  requirements  of  section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)     The  information  contained  in the  Quarterly  Report on Form
                  10-QSB  fairly  presents,   in  all  material  respects,   the
                  financial   condition   and  result  of   operations   of  the
                  Registrant.


Date:  August 12, 2004                             /s/ JAMES A. WYLIE, JR.
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                   James A. Wylie, Jr.
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)
----

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 10 June 2004

in Case C-555/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Charleroi): Magali Warbecq v Ryanair Ltd (1)

(Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters - Court or tribunal having the power under Article 68 EC to request the Court to give a preliminary ruling - Court lacking jurisdiction to give a preliminary ruling)

(2004/C 228/36)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-555/03: reference to the Court under Article 68 EC by the Tribunal du travail de Chareleroi (Belgium) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Magali Warbecq and Ryanair Ltd — on the interpretation of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1) — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, K. Schiemann and E. Juhász, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has made an order on 10 June 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court of Justice of the European Communities clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Tribunal du travail de Charleroi (Belgium) by judgment of 15 December 2003.

----

(1)OJ C 47 of 21.2.2004.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                   1,388
<SECURITIES>                            19,371
<RECEIVABLES>                                0
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        21,303
<PP&E>                                  31,693
<DEPRECIATION>                          27,781
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          29,781
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   12,170
<BONDS>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    26
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                             (13,729)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            29,781
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           547
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        12,767
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        (808)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (12,363)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (12,363)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                           (12,363)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (0.24)



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; PAR Panel: Technologies for Healthy Independent Living.                     

*Date:*                         September 9, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         John Firrell, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5118, MSC 7854, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-2598,                         *firrellj@csr.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 3, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-20326 Filed 8-9-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Triad Hospitals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James D. Shelton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    JAMES D. SHELTONJames D. Shelton Chief Executive Officer November 13, 2002
### Routes to desert watering places in the Mohave Desert Region, California

Compiled by: David Grosh Thompson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp490B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available. 

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.