alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(79 South. 768)

#### HALL v. INGRAM LAND CO.

(7 Div. 518.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 4, 1918.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 8, 1918.)

Appeal and Error @=>529(1) — Record—Necessity op Showing Judgment. *

Where record discloses no judgment that will sustain an appeal, an order dismissing appeal will not be set aside.

Appeal from Circuit Court, De Kalb County ; W. W. Haralson, Judge.

Action between Mrs. Josie Hall and the Ingram Land Company. Appeal by former having been dismissed she moves to set aside the order of dismissal.

Motion overruled.

J. A. Johnson and Hunt & Wolfes, all of Ft. Payne, for appellant. Carl D. Coker, of Birmingham, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this case was dismissed on motion of the appellee, June 4, 1918, and on June 13th a motion was submitted to set aside the order of dismissal. An, examination of the record discloses no judgment that will sustain an appeal, and this necessitates the overruling of the motion to set aside the order of dismissal.

Motion overruled.
#### § 452.128 Under-strength representation.

A local union may elect fewer delegates than it is permitted under the union constitution as long as the local is allowed to determine for itself whether or not it will send its full quota of delegates to the union convention. The delegates present from a local may cast the entire vote allotted to that local if this is permitted by the constitution and bylaws.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Report of LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J.
Culotta, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: April 28, 2004 /s/ Michael J. CulottaMichael J. CulottaChief Financial Officer
§ 1912.5 National Advisory Committee on Occupational Safety and Health. ( a ) Section 7(a) of the Act established a National Advisory Committee on Occupational Safety and Health. The Committee is to advise, consult with, and make recommendations to the Secretary and the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare on matters relating to general administration of the Act.
( b ) Advisory committees appointed under section 7(b) of the Act, which are the subject of this part, have a more limited role. Such advisory committees are concerned exclusively with assisting the Assistant Secretary in his standards-setting functions under section 6 of the Act.
( c ) On the other hand, the Advisory Committee on Construction Safety and Health, established under the Construction Safety Act, provides assistance in both the setting of standards thereunder and policy matters arising in the administration of the Construction Safety Act. To the extent that the Advisory Committee on Construction Safety and Health renders advice to the Assistant Secretary on general policy matters, its activities should be coordinated with those of the National Advisory Committee on Occupational Safety and Health.
§ 4901.17 Expedited action on requests and appeals. ( a ) *In general.* Upon a request submitted in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, PBGC will expedite a disclosure request under § 4901.11 or an appeal under § 4901.15 if PBGC determines that the requester has demonstrated one of the following: ( 1 ) The disclosure request or appeal involves circumstances in which the lack of expedited action could reasonably be expected to pose an imminent threat to the life or physical safety of an individual or the loss of an individual's substantial due process rights.
( 2 ) The requester is primarily engaged in disseminating information and the disclosure request or appeal is urgently needed to inform the public about an actual or alleged Federal Government activity.
( b ) *Timing and method of request.* A request for PBGC to expedite a disclosure request or an appeal may be made at any time and must be made by mail, in-person delivery, or electronic telecommunication in accordance with the FOIA instructions on PBGC's website, *www.pbgc.gov .*
( c ) *Action on request.* ( 1 ) PBGC will notify the requester within 10 calendar days of receipt of a request for expedited action whether PBGC will expedite a disclosure request or an appeal.
( 2 ) *Request granted.* If PBGC determines that the request for expedited action will be granted, PBGC will take action on the disclosure request or the appeal as soon as practicable.
( 3 ) *Request denied.* If PBGC determines that the request for expedited action will be denied, PBGC will so advise the requester in writing with a brief statement of the reasons for the denial. The writing will also include the name and title or position of the person(s) responsible for the denial, outline the appeal procedure available, and notify the requester of the right to seek dispute resolution services from a PBGC FOIA Public Liaison or the Office of Government Information Services. PBGC will act on any appeal of that decision expeditiously.
[87 FR 43996, July 25, 2022]
#### § 530.3 Application forms for individual homeworker certificates.

Certificates authorizing the employment of industrial homeworkers in the industries defined in § 530.1 may be issued on the following terms and conditions upon application therefore on forms provided by the Wage and Hour Division. Such forms shall be signed by both the homeworker and the employer.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1235-0001)

[24 FR 729, Feb. 3, 1959, as amended at 49 FR 18294, Apr. 30, 1984; 82 FR 2228, Jan. 9, 2017]
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: "Gaerlan, Joan" <JGaerlan@ci.glendale.ca.us> Date: 7/22/2010 9:54 AM Subject: Re: Request for Extension of EPA Questionnaire for Plant ID 02827 Attachments: pic08250.gif; 070710 Request for Extension EPA Questionnaire.pdf

Greetings, EPA has reviewed your extension requ est for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the Glendale Water and Power (GWP) Grayson Station. Your request for extension has been denied. The deadline for your plant to submit Version 4 of the completed questionnaire remains 90 days after receipt. If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560. Sincerely, (Embedded image moved to file: pic08250.gif)

From: "Gaerlan, Joan" <JGaerlan@ci.glendale.ca.us>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Cruz, Nicolas" <NCruz@ci.glendale.ca.us>

Date: 07/07/2010 05:49 PM Subject: Request for Extension of EPA Questionnaire for Plant ID 02827

Dear Ms. Alicea, On behalf of City of Glendale Water and Power, please find the attached pdf file as our request for extension of EPA questionnaire for Grayson Power Plant (Plant ID 02827). A hard copy of this letter has been sent to your attention via snail mail today. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Nick Cruz at 818.548.3399. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely,

Joan Antonette V. GaerlanMechanical Engineering Assistant Glendale Water & Power - Power Management Tel. 818.548.2828 Fax. 818.548.3377 JGaerlan@ci.glendale.ca.us (See attached file: 070710 Reques t for Extension EPA Questionnaire.pdf)
(77 South. 1004)

#### NICKLES et al. v. CARWILE et al.

(7 Div. 445.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 13, 1917.)

Appeal from Clay County Court; E. J. Garrison, Judge. Action by R. G. Nickles and others against H. J. Carwile and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

Corrected and affirmed.

Riddle & Riddle, of Talladega, and Pruet & I-Iardegree, of Ashland, for appellants. W. M. Lackey, of Ashland, for appellees.

BROWN, P. J.

This case has been considered by this court in banc before preparation of this opinion, and the opinion then prevailed that the only question presented was one of fact, and, after careful consideration of the evidence, that the buggy, the value of which is ascertained to be $25, the piano, valued at $200, and the automobile, valued at $250; are the property of the defendant H. J. Car-wile, and subject to the plaintiff’s attachment; that the other property is the property of the claimant A. B. Carwile, and not subject to the defendant’s attachment. The judgment appealed from is therefore accordingly corrected, and, as corrected, is affirmed. One-half of the costs in this court and the trial court are taxed against appellant, and the other against appellee A. B. Carwile. Corrected and affirmed.
§ 1610.18 Information to be disclosed. The Commission will provide the following information to the public. This information will also be made available electronically: ( a ) The Commission will make available for inspection and copying certain tabulations of aggregate industry, area, and other statistics derived from the Commission's reporting programs authorized by section 709(c) of title VII, provide that such tabulations: Were previously compiled by the Commission and are available in documentary form; comprise an aggregation of data from not less than three responding entities; and, do not reveal the identity of an individual or dominant entity in a particular industry or area;
( b ) All blank forms used by the Commission;
( c ) Subject to the restrictions and procedures set forth in § 1610.19, all signed contracts, final bids on all signed contracts, and agreements between the Commission and State or local agencies charged with the administration of State or local fair employment practices laws;
( d ) All final reports that do not contain statutorily confidential material in a recognizable form;
( e ) All agency correspondence to members of the public, Members of Congress, or other persons not government employees or special government employees, except those containing information that would produce an invasion of privacy if made public;
( f ) All administrative staff manuals and instructions to staff that affect members of the public unless the materials are promptly published and copies offered for sale; and
( g ) All final votes of each Commissioner, for every Commission meeting, except for votes pertaining to filing suit against respondents until such litigation is commenced.
( h ) Underlying annual FOIA report data.
[56 FR 29579, June 28, 1991, as amended at 63 FR 1342, Jan. 9, 1998; 78 FR 36653, June 19, 2013]
PROMISSORY NOTE



$20,000.00                                                        March 4, 1999


        The undersigned, Navis Technologies, LTD ("Payor"), promises to pay to
John R. Varsames ("Payee") or order the principal sum of twenty thousand and
00/100 DOLLARS ($20,000.00) with interest accruing on the unpaid principal
balance at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum, the entire principal
balance plus accrued interest being due and payable on demand.

        Such payment(s) shall be made at Payee's residence located at
Burlington, Vermont, or at such other place as the Payee hereof may designate in
writing, and such payments and any other sum due hereunder shall be made in
lawful money of the United States of America.

        This Note may be prepaid without penalty.

        In the case of default, the Payor agrees to pay the reasonable cost of
collection, including reasonable attorneys' fees.

        Every maker, guarantor and endorser waives presentment, demand, protest,
and notice and agrees that the time of payment may be extended without notice or
previous consent.

                                                 Navis Technologies, LTD




ATTEST:    /S/                                   By:  /S/
       ---------------------------                  ---------------------------
       Peter M. Doremus, Secretary                  John R. Varsames, President




Paid in Full

Date:______________________

Signature:_________________
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 125 

Designating May 18, 2007, as ‘‘Endangered Species Day’’, and encouraging 

the people of the United States to become educated about, and aware 

of, threats to species, success stories in species recovery, and the opportunity to promote species conservation worldwide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 27, 2007 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. LEVIN, Ms. 

SNOWE, Mr. KERRY, Mr. BIDEN, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. 

WYDEN, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. CRAPO, and Mr. SANDERS) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating May 18, 2007, as ‘‘Endangered Species Day’’, 

and encouraging the people of the United States to become educated about, and aware of, threats to species, 

success stories in species recovery, and the opportunity 

to promote species conservation worldwide. 

Whereas in the United States and around the world, more 

than 1,000 species are officially designated as at risk of 

extinction and thousands more also face a heightened 

risk of extinction; 

Whereas the actual and potential benefits derived from many 

species have not yet been fully discovered and would be 

permanently lost if not for conservation efforts; 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 125 IS 

Whereas recovery efforts for species such as the whooping 

crane, Kirtland’s warbler, the peregrine falcon, the gray 

wolf, the gray whale, the grizzly bear, and others have resulted in great improvements in the viability of such species; 

Whereas saving a species requires a combination of sound research, careful coordination, and intensive management 

of conservation efforts, along with increased public 

awareness and education; 

Whereas two-thirds of endangered or threatened species reside on private lands; 

Whereas voluntary cooperative conservation programs have 

proven to be critical for habitat restoration and species 

recovery; and 

Whereas education and increasing public awareness are the 

first steps in effectively informing the public about endangered species and species restoration efforts: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates May 18, 2007, as ‘‘Endangered 

3 Species Day’’; and 

4 (2) encourages— 

5 (A) educational entities to spend at least 

6 30 minutes on Endangered Species Day teach7 ing and informing students about threats to, 

8 and the restoration of, endangered species 

9 around the world, including the essential role of 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 125 IS 

1 private landowners and private stewardship to 

2 the protection and recovery of species; 

3 (B) organizations, businesses, private land4 owners, and agencies with a shared interest in 

5 conserving endangered species to collaborate on 

6 educational information for use in schools; and 

7 (C) the people of the United States to ob8 serve the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

9 activities. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
AAM-12-312-E 

April 18,2012 

 Exemption No. 10049A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0358 

Mr. Chin Yi Tu 

President 

Civic Helicopters, Inc. 

2206 Palomar Airport Road, Suite H 

Carlsbad, CA 92011 

Dear Mr. Tu: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10049. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated April 4, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Civic Helicopters, Inc. (Civic Helicopters), for an extension of Exemption 

No. 10049. That exemption from § 91.147 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 

allows Civic Helicopters to operate under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safetysensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Civic Helicopters. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10049 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations. 
2 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Civic Helicopters are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at 

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Civic Helicopters part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10049. This exemption 

terminates on April 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. This letter must be 

attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 10049. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
### Geology and water resources of Smith Valley, Lyon and Douglas Counties, Nevada

By: Omar J. LoeltzThomas E. Eakin

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1228

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KIER KEAND’E GARDNER, AKA Chris 

Gardner, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

WHATCOM COUNTY; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-35794 

D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01451-MJP 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 19, 2021**

Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. 

Washington state prisoner Kier Keand’e Gardner appeals pro se from the 

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

constitutional violations arising from his pretrial detention. We have jurisdiction 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s summary judgment 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 29 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-35794 

for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 

1168 (9th Cir. 2014). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Gardner 

failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and failed to raise a genuine dispute 

of material fact as to whether administrative remedies were effectively unavailable. 

See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 90 (2006) (proper exhaustion requires “using 

all steps that the agency holds out, and doing so properly (so that the agency 

addresses the issues on the merits)” (citation and internal quotation marks 

omitted)); see also FTC v. Neovi, Inc., 604 F.3d 1150, 1159 (9th Cir. 2010) ( “[A 

court] need not find a genuine issue of fact if, in its determination, the particular 

declaration was uncorroborated and self-serving.”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Gardner’s motion 

for reconsideration because Gardner failed to establish any basis for relief. See 

Sch. Dist. No. 1J Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 

(9th Cir. 1993) (setting forth standard of review and grounds for reconsideration 

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e)).

Gardner’s motion to supplement the record (Docket Entry No. 24) is denied.

AFFIRMED.
§ 519.5 Conditions governing issuance of full-time student certificates. Certificates authorizing the employment of full-time students at subminimum wage rates shall not be issued unless the following conditions are met: ( a ) Full-time students are available for employment at subminimum rates; the granting of a certificate is necessary in order to prevent curtailment of opportunities for employment.
( b ) The employment of more than six full-time students by an employer will not create a substantial probability of reducing the full-time employment opportunities for persons other than those employed under such certificates.
( c ) Abnormal labor conditions such as a strike or lockout do not exist at the farm or establishment for which a full-time student certificate is requested.
( d ) The data given on the application are accurate and based on available records.
( e ) The farms or establishments on whose experience the applicant relies meet the requirements of paragraph (h) of § 519.6.
( f ) There are no serious outstanding violations of the provisions of a full-time student certificate previously issued to the employer, nor have there been any serious violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (including Child-Labor Regulation No. 3 and the Hazardous Occupations Orders published in part 570 of this chapter) which provide reasonable grounds to conclude that the terms of a certificate may not be compiled with, if issued.
( g ) The subminimum wage rate(s) proposed to be paid full-time students under temporary authorization or under certificate is not less than 85 percent of the minimum wage applicable under section 6 of the Act.
( h ) Certificates will not be issued where such issuance will result in a reduction of the wage rate paid to a current employee, including current student employees.
[40 FR 6329, Feb. 11, 1975, as amended at 42 FR 58745, Nov. 11, 1977]