alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              13
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,579
<ALLOWANCES>                                       467
<INVENTORY>                                      2,298
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,646
<PP&E>                                           7,114
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,251
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           413
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,553)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,015
<SALES>                                          6,937
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,118
<CGS>                                            3,228
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,599
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   308
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 381
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (970)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (970)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (970)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
        

</TABLE>
§ 4211.34 Rolling-5 method for withdrawals after the initial plan year. ( a ) *General rule.* Under this section, the amount of unfunded vested benefits allocable to an employer that withdraws from a merged plan after the initial plan year is the sum of the employer's proportional share, if any, of the unamortized amount of the plan's initial plan year unfunded vested benefits (determined under paragraph (b) of this section) and the employer's proportional share of the unamortized amount of the unfunded vested benefits arising after the initial plan year (determined under paragraph (c) of this section).
( b ) *Share of initial plan year unfunded vested benefits.* An employer's proportional share, if any, of the unamortized amount of the plan's initial plan year unfunded vested benefits is the sum of the employer's share of its prior plan's liabilities, as determined under § 4211.32(b)(1), and the employer's share of the adjusted initial plan year unfunded vested benefits, as determined under § 4211.32(b)(2), with such sum reduced as if it were being fully amortized in level annual installments over five years beginning with the first plan year after the initial plan year.
( c ) *Share of unfunded vested benefits arising after the initial plan year.* An employer's proportional share of the amount of the plan's unfunded vested benefits arising after the initial plan year is the employer's proportional share determined under § 4211.33(c).
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/18 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
#### § 504.1 Cross-reference.

Regulations governing labor condition attestations by facilities using nonimmigrant aliens as registered nurses are found at 20 CFR part 655, subparts D and E.
#### § 409.2 Annual report.

Each surety company having in force any bond required by section 502 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 or section 412 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act during the fiscal year, shall file with the Office of Labor-Management Standards a report, on U.S. Department of Labor Form S-1 entitled “Surety Company Annual Report”[1] signed by the president and treasurer or corresponding principal officers, in the detail required by the instructions accompanying such form and constituting a part thereof.

[42 FR 59070, Nov. 15, 1977, as amended at 50 FR 31309, Aug. 1, 1985; 50 FR 31310, Aug. 1, 1985]

###### Footnotes -
  409.2

[1] Filed as part of the original document.
**EX-99.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Tracy A. Thomson, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge the Quarterly Report ofCornerstone Realty Fund, LLC on Form 10-Q for the three month period endedMarch 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchForm 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition andresults of operations of Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC.

 
|                     | /s/ Tracy A. Thomson                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  May 15, 2003 | Tracy A. Thomson  Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)  of Cornerstone Ventures, Inc., the Manager of  Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC,  the Managing Member of Cornerstone Realty Fund,  LLC |

 

 

----
PUBLIC LAW 115–193—JUNE 25, 2018 132 STAT. 1505 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2246: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Feb. 14, considered and passed Senate. 

June 7, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–193 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the health care center of the Department of Veterans Affairs in 

Tallahassee, Florida, as the Sergeant Ernest I. ‘‘Boots’’ Thomas VA Clinic, and 

for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF A DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS CLINIC IN FLORIDA. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The Health Care Center of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs located at 2181 Orange Avenue in Tallahassee, 

Florida, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known 

and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Ernest I. ‘Boots’ Thomas VA 

Clinic’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the clinic 

referred to in paragraph (1) shall be considered to be a reference 

to the Sergeant Ernest I. ‘‘Boots’’ Thomas VA Clinic. 

Approved June 25, 2018. 

June 25, 2018 

[S. 2246]
|  (1)such    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 fully    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934; and    (2)the    information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter    ended March 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial    condition and results of operations of iVillage Inc. Date:  May 14, 2004/s/ DOUGLAS W. MCCORMICK Douglas W.    McCormick Chief    Executive Officer  Date:  May 14, 2004/s/ SCOTT LEVINE Scott Levine Chief    Financial Officer *A signed  original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or  otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the  electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been  provided to iVillage Inc. and will be retained by iVillage Inc. and furnished  to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.* *The information in this Exhibit 32 is being furnished to the Securities  and Exchange Commission and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section  18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to  the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by  reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the  Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a  filing.* |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# ino'JFietanSii 1.40,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA AF 06-0090

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPOINTMENT OF A MEMBER TO THE COMMISSION ON PRACTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

# FILED MAR 1 9 2021
Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Rule 2 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement provides that appointments to the Commission on Practice shall be made by the Supreme Court from a list ofthree licensed and practicing attorneys submitted to the Courtwho have received the highest number ofvotes in an election by the Area resident members ofthe State Bar of Montana. Rule 2further provides that this Court shall,by order,designate the time,place, and method for the election ofmembers for appointment to the Commission on Practice. The term ofthe current attorney member for Area C expires April 1, 2021. Area C is now comprised ofthe Second,Third,and Fifth Judicial Districts. THEREFORE, IT IS NOW ORDERED: 1.An election shall be had in Area C for nomination ofthree resident bar members whose names shall be submitted to this Court,and this Court shall then appoint one ofthe three to membership on the Commission on Practice. 2. The election in Area C shall be the responsibility ofDistrict Judge Luke Berger. 3. The election shall be conducted in the following manner: (a) Atthe discretion ofJudge Berger,the election may be conducted either by e-mail or regular mail. Whether by e-mail or regular mail, the ballots shall be in the following form: 03/19/2021

Case Number: AF 06-0090

### 1.

2. 3. AREA C

Second,Third,and Fifth Judicial Districts BALLOT FOR MEMBERS OF COMMISSION ON PRACTICE

(Vote for Three)

The election will close April 9,2021. Your ballot must be returned so as to reach its destination on or before that date. The names ofthe three attorneys receiving the highest number ofvotes will be sent to the Montana Supreme Court,which then will appoint one ofthem to the Commission.

******************** 

### (b)Judge Berger shall prepare and distribute the ballots on or before March 26, 2021. (c)Voted ballots must be returned to Judge Berger on or before April 9,2021. (d)The ballots are to be opened and counted by Judge Berger. Judge Berger shall then certify to this Court the names ofthe three attorneys in Area C receiving the highest number ofvotes on or before April 12,2021. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy ofthis Order to the Honorable Luke Berger,to each member ofthe Commission on Practice, and to Shelly Smith, Office Administrator for the Commission on Practice. DATED this 1 4

1 4-rj a f a y ofMarch,2021. For the Court,

ChiefJustice

2
§ 500.60 Farm labor contractors' recruitment, contractual and general obligations. The Act imposes certain specific recruitment, contractual and general obligations on farm labor contractors and farm labor contractor employees. The contractor is responsible for any violations under the Act committed by his employee. Each of the following obligations applies to both farm labor contractors and farm labor contractor employees. ( a ) Each farm labor contractor shall provide to any other farm labor contractor and to any agricultural employer and agricultural association to which such farm labor contractor has furnished any migrant or seasonal agricultural worker, copies of all records for that place of employment which such farm labor contractor is required to retain for each worker furnished or supplied. The recipient of these records shall keep them for a period of three years.
( b ) Each farm labor contractor, without regard to any other provisions of this Act, shall obtain at each place of employment and make available for inspection to every worker he furnishes for employment, a written statement of the conditions of such employment as described in sections 201(b) and 301(b) of the Act and §§ 500.75 and 500.76 of these regulations. As with the written disclosure statements under §§ 500.76 and 500.77, these statements must be provided to the workers in English or, as necessary and reasonable, in Spanish or another language common to migrant or seasonal agricultural workers who are not fluent in English.
( c ) ( 1 ) No farm labor contractor shall violate, without justification, the terms of any written agreements made with an agricultural employer or an agricultural association pertaining to any contracting activity or worker protection under the Act. Normally, “without justification” would not include situations in which failure to comply with the terms of any written agreements was directly attributable to Acts of God, due to conditions beyond the control of the person or to conditions which he could not reasonably foresee.
( 2 ) Written agreements do not relieve a farm labor contractor of any responsibility that such contractor would otherwise have under the Act and these regulations.
( d ) All payroll records made by the farm labor contractor must be retained by him for a period of three years.
Exhibit 4.24

 

Second Registration Rights Agreement Joinder

 

April 2, 2015

 

Each of the undersigned hereby agrees as Guarantor (as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement (as amended, supplemented or joined, the “Registration Rights Agreement”), dated as of October 27, 2014, among Dynegy Inc., a Delaware corporation (as successor in interest to each of Dynegy Finance I, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Dynegy Finance II, Inc., a Delaware corporation), and the Guarantors party thereto and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Barclays Capital Inc., Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, RBC Capital Markets, LLC and UBS Securities LLC, as representatives of the several Initial Purchasers listed on Schedule I thereto) to be bound by the terms and provisions attributable to a Guarantor of the Registration Rights Agreement and to assume and be bound to perform all obligations of a Guarantor thereunder.  By executing and delivering this Second Registration Rights Agreement Joinder, each of the undersigned hereby becomes a party to the Registration Rights Agreement as a Guarantor thereunder.

 

[SIGNATURE PAGES FOLLOW]

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this counterpart as of the date first set forth above.

 

 

	
 
    	
Dynegy   Energy Services (East), LLC, as a Guarantor
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Robert C. Flexon
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:   Robert C. Flexon
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Dynegy   Resource I, LLC
    
	
 
    	
Dynegy   Commercial Asset Management, LLC
    
	
 
    	
Dynegy   Conesville, LLC
    
	
 
    	
Dynegy   Dicks Creek, LLC
    
	
 
    	
Dynegy   Fayette II, LLC
    
	
 
    	
Dynegy   Hanging Rock II, LLC
    
	
 
    	
Dynegy   Killen, LLC
    
	
 
    	
Dynegy   Lee II, LLC
    
	
 
    	
Dynegy   Miami Fort, LLC
    
	
 
    	
Dynegy   Stuart, LLC
    
	
 
    	
Dynegy   Washington II, LLC
    
	
 
    	
Dynegy   Zimmer, LLC
    
	
 
    	
Dynegy   Coal Generation, LLC
    
	
 
    	
Dynegy   Gas Generation, LLC
    
	
 
    	
Dynegy   Generation Holdco, LLC, as Guarantors
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Robert C. Flexon
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:   Robert C. Flexon
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:   President & Chief Executive Officer
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
D.K ., MOTHER OF S.W., J.K., J.K., T.R.W., J.W., and K .W., CHILD REN ,

Appellant ,
v. Case No. 5D23-0641 LT Case No. 2022-DP-0 00536
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Appellee

. _______________________________________/ Decision filed April 28, 2023 Appe al from the Circu it Court for Brev ard County, Kelly J. McKibben, J udge.
David Maldonado, J.D., of Maldonado Law Firm, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellant.
Kell e y Schae f fer , of Children’s Legal Services, Bra d enton, for Appellee. Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Stephanie E. Noven ar io, Senior Attorney, of Guardian ad Litem, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem. PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. KILBANE, EISNAUGLE a nd EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
§ 1206.1 Run-off elections. ( a ) In an election among any craft or class where three or more options (including the option for no representation) receive valid votes, if no option receives a majority of the legal votes cast, or in the event of a tie vote, the Board shall authorize a run-off election.
( b ) In the event a run-off election is authorized by the Board, the two options which received the highest number of votes cast in the first election shall be placed on the run-off ballot. No blank line on which voters may write in the name of any organization, individual, or no representation will be provided on the run-off ballot.
( c ) Employees who were eligible to vote at the conclusion of the first election shall be eligible to vote in the run-off election except: ( 1 ) Those employees whose employment relationship has terminated; and
( 2 ) Those employees who are no longer employed in the craft or class.
[77 FR 75549, Dec. 21, 2012, as amended at 84 FR 35989, July 26, 2019]
#### § 502.31 Written notice of determination required.

Whenever the Administrator, WHD decides to assess a civil money penalty or to proceed administratively to enforce covered contractual obligations, including the recovery of unpaid wages, the person against whom such action is taken shall be notified in writing of such determination.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12–60331

DEREJE YEMANE WOLDEGIORGISE, 

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Government moves to dismiss Derek Woldegiorgise’s (“Woldegiorgise”)

petition for review. Because we dismiss his appeal on an alternative basis, the 1

Government’s motion is moot. 

In responding to the Government’s motion, Woldegiorgise asserts that the

Government has misconstrued his request for relief and clarifies that he has not

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 13, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

This court previously denied Woldegiorgise’s motion for a stay in this case but granted 1

him leave to proceed IFP on appeal. 

Case: 12-60331 Document: 00511886475 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/13/2012
No. 12–60331

petitioned this court to review the Board of Immigration Appeal’s final order.

He explains that he instead sought this court’s stay to support a coram nobis

motion currently pending before the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas. See Woldegiorgise v. Thaler, No. 4:12-CV-1318 (S.D.

Tex. Apr. 24, 2012). 

Woldegiorgise seeks relief from the district court and raises arguments

before this court that have not yet been addressed by the district court. We lack

jurisdiction and DISMISS his appeal. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292 (limiting our

jurisdiction over district court orders to final judgments and some interlocutory

orders); FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(C) (instructing us to treat appeals from coram

nobis motions under the rules for civil appeals). The Government’s motion is

therefore MOOT. 

2

Case: 12-60331 Document: 00511886475 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/13/2012
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andre Thomas, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 905]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered May 29, 1996, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*572The defendant’s contention that the prosecution did not produce legally sufficient evidence at trial to prove that he knew the vehicle in his possession was stolen is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s acquittal on the robbery charge does not preclude his conviction of criminal possession of stolen property charges *(see, People v Martinez,*216 AD2d 586).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Altman, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.