alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

I Comunicaciones

Comisión

----

Tipo de cambio del euro (1)

15 de noviembre de 2004

(2004/C 279/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Fuente: tipo de cambio de referencia publicado por el Banco Central Europeo.

----

----

No oposición a una concentración notificada

(Asunto no COMP/M.3563 — CVC/BASF PRINTING INKS)

(2004/C 279/02)

(Texto pertinente a efectos del EEE)

El 28 de octubre de 2004, la Comisión decidió no oponerse a la concentración notificada citada en el encabezamiento y declararla compatible con el mercado común. Esta Decisión se basa en la letra b) del apartado 1 del artículo 6 del Reglamento (CE) no 139/2004 del Consejo. El texto íntegro de la Decisión solamente está disponible en inglés y se hará público una vez suprimidos los secretos comerciales que pueda contener. Estará disponible:

----

III Informaciones

Comisión

----

Convocatoria para la presentación de candidaturas con objeto de designar operadores encargados de prestar en Francia el servicio universal de comunicaciones electrónicas

(2004/C 279/03)

El Ministerio francés de Economía, Finanzas e Industria anuncia por la presente su intención de lanzar una convocatoria para la presentación de candidaturas con objeto de designar a los operadores encargados de prestar en Francia el servicio universal de comunicaciones electrónicas. Este servicio incluye los tres elementos siguientes, descritos en el artículo L.35-1 del Código francés de Correos y Telecomunicaciones Electrónicas:

Próximamente se publicarán en el Journal Officiel de la République Française (Diario Oficial de la República Francesa) tres avisos de convocatoria para la presentación de candidaturas, que podrán consultarse en el sitio web siguiente: www.telecom.gouv.fr.

----

----

1 de noviembre de 2004: ¡nueva versión de EUR-Lex!

europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/

El nuevo sitio incluye el servicio CELEX y ofrece acceso gratuito y sencillo en 20 lenguas al mayor banco de datos documentales sobre el Derecho de la Unión Europea.

----
#### § 37.1 What is the purpose of this part?

The purpose of this part is to implement the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA), which are contained in section 188 of WIA. Section 188 prohibits discrimination on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, political affiliation or belief, and for beneficiaries only, citizenship or participation in a WIA Title I-financially assisted program or activity. This part clarifies the application of the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIA and provides uniform procedures for implementing them.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KAREEM TODD,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 728 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of April, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
(75 South. 1005)

#### CLINTON MINING CO. v. WILLIAMS.

(6 Div. 326.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 19, 1917.)

Appeal from City Gourt of Birmingham; John H. Miller, Judge.

Percy, Benners & Burr, of Birmingham, for appellant. Beddow & Oherdorfer, of Birmingham, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed by agreement.
#### § 500.200 Establishment of procedures and rules of practice.

This subpart codifies and establishes the procedures and rules of practice necessary for the administrative enforcement of the Act.
§ 44.3 Election process. ( a ) *Process.* The Commissioner of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor (hereafter referred to as “the Commissioner”) or his or her designee shall conduct the elections. The Commissioner shall provide a ballot containing the names of the employment statistics directors in the appropriate region to the employment statistics director in each State who is affiliated with the State agency designated pursuant to section 15(e) of the Wagner-Peyser Act. If a State has not designated an agency, or has not provided the name of the employment statistics director to the Commissioner, the State shall not participate in the election process. Each director may vote for one director to be the regional representative. The Commissioner shall prescribe a time limit that will not be less than one week for the directors to mark and return the ballots. Only votes received by the Commissioner within the prescribed time limit will be counted. The Commissioner will tally the votes from the ballots received within the prescribed time limit and the director receiving the most votes in the region will be the representative for that region. If there is a tie after the first round of votes are counted, the Commissioner shall conduct additional rounds of voting using a ballot containing the names of the directors who tied with the most votes in the previous round until a representative is elected. The Commissioner will prescribe a time limit of not less than one week for each additional round of voting and will tally the votes received within the prescribed time limit. The director with the most votes will be the representative.
( b ) *Method of transmission.* The Commissioner may distribute the ballots relating to the election under this part by electronic mail or other methods the Commissioner determines to be appropriate and may specify the methods through which votes are to be cast.
( c ) *Vacancies.* If a representative does not complete the term, the Commissioner shall conduct an election to elect a replacement for the remainder of the term using the procedures described in paragraph (a) and (b) of this section.
§ 2520.104-24 Exemption for welfare plans for certain selected employees. ( a ) *Purpose and scope.* ( 1 ) This section, under the authority of section 104(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, exempts unfunded or insured welfare plans maintained by an employer for the purpose of providing benefits for a select group of management or highly compensated employees from the reporting and disclosure provisions of part 1 of title I of the Act, except for the requirement to provide plan documents to the Secretary of Labor upon request under section 104(a)(1) of the Act.
( 2 ) Under section 104(a)(3) of the Act, the Secretary is authorized to exempt by regulation any welfare benefit plan from all or part of the reporting and disclosure requirements of title I of the Act.
( b ) *Exemption.* Under the authority of section 104(a)(3) of the Act, each employee welfare benefit plan described in paragraph (c) of this section is exempted from the reporting and disclosure provisions of part 1 of title I of the Act, except for providing plan documents to the Secretary of Labor upon request as required by section 104(a)(6).
( c ) *Application.* This exemption is available only to employee welfare benefit plans: ( 1 ) Which are maintained by an employer primarily for the purpose of providing benefits for a select group of management or highly compensated employees, and
( 2 ) For which benefits ( i ) are paid as needed solely from the general assets of the employer,
( ii ) are provided exclusively through insurance contracts or policies, the premiums for which are paid directly by the employer from its general assets, issued by an insurance company or similar organization which is qualified to do business in any State, or
( iii ) both.
[40 FR 34533, Aug. 15, 1975, as amended at 67 FR 776, Jan. 7, 2002]
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

07/19

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.48 N 77.37 W Meters AGL
#### § 471.16 Under what circumstances may a contractor be reinstated?

Any contractor or subcontractor debarred from or declared ineligible for further contracts under the Executive Order and this part may request reinstatement in a letter to the Director of OLMS. In connection with a request for reinstatement, debarred contractors and subcontractors shall be required to show that they have established and will carry out policies and practices in compliance with the Executive Order and implementing regulations. Before reaching a decision, the Director of OLMS may request that a compliance evaluation of the contractor or subcontractor be conducted, and may require the contractor or subcontractor to supply additional information regarding the request for reinstatement. If the Director of OLMS finds that the contractor or subcontractor has come into compliance with the Executive Order and this part and has shown that it will carry out the Executive Order and this part, the contractor or subcontractor may be reinstated. The Director of OLMS shall issue a written decision on the request.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

JOSE RIVERA-LUGO, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-10352 

D.C. No. 2:17-cr-01165-DLR-2 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 17, 2019**

Before: McKEOWN, BYBEE, and OWENS, Circuit Judges. 

Jose Rivera-Lugo appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges 

his guilty-plea conviction and 90-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with 

intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B), and 

846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rivera-Lugo’s 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 24 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-10352 

counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a 

motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Rivera-Lugo the 

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or 

answering brief has been filed. 

Rivera-Lugo waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our 

independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 

(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United 

States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss 

the appeal. See id. at 988. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 21

Principal Subsidiaries of the Company (Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

  Lawter International FSC, Limited (Jamaica)
    Kingston, Jamaica

  Lawter International (Kallo) N.V. (Belgium)
    Kallo, Belgium

  Lawter International (Canada) Co. (Canada)
    Rexdale, Ontario, Canada

  Lawter International Fujian Nanping PRC Limited (Peoples Republic of China)
    Peoples Republic of China
    Dazhou, China

  Lawter International, Ltd. (Tianjin)P.R.C. (Peoples Republic of China)
    Tanggu, Peoples Republic of China

 Lawter International, GmbH (Germany)
    Frechen, Germany

  Lawter International, Limited (Great Britain)
    Bicester, Oxon, England

Lawter International, B.V. (Netherlands)
    Waterford, Ireland

  Lawter Antilles, N.V. (Netherlands Antilles)
    Curacao, Netherlands Antilles

  Lawter International Products
    Pte. Ltd. (Singapore)
    Jurong Town, Singapore

  Lawter International Luxembourg S.a.r.l. (Luxembourg)
    Luxembourg

Lawter International Malta Limited (Malta)
    Valetta, Malta
#### § 4044.71 Valuation of annuity benefits.

The value of a benefit which is to be paid as an annuity is the cost of purchasing the annuity on the date of distribution from an insurer.

[61 FR 34059, July 1, 1996, as amended at 76 FR 34606, June 14, 2011]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gregory J. Divis, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                                                       
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: June 10, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Gregory J. Divis                                  
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Gregory J. Divis President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as our exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be deemed to be considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         58795
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
**EXHIBIT 14**

 

# **CODE OF ETHICS FOR CEO AND FINANCIALOFFICERS**

 

The CEO and all Financial Officers, including the CFO, PrincipalAccounting Officer, Controller or any other person performing similarfunctions, are subject to the following requirements and procedures relating toethical conduct, conflicts of interest and compliance with laws.

 

1.                                       The CEO and allFinancial Officers shall conduct themselves honestly and ethically.  All actual or apparent conflicts of interestbetween their personal and professional relationships are to be avoided.

 

2.                                       The CEO and allFinancial Officers are responsible for full, fair, accurate, timely andunderstandable disclosure in periodic reports to the public, to the Company’sshareholders and in reports filed by the Company with the SEC.  Accordingly, it is the responsibility of theCEO and each Financial Officer promptly to bring to the attention of the Boardof Directors and the Audit Committee any material information of which he or shemay become aware that affect the disclosures made by the Company in itsreports.

 

3.                                       The CEO and eachFinancial Officer shall promptly bring to the attention of the Board ofDirectors and the Audit Committee any information he or she may have concerning(a) significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controlswhich could adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial data or (b) any fraud, whether or not material,that involves any member of the Company’s management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Company’s financial reporting, disclosures orinternal controls.

 

4.                                       The CEO and eachFinancial Officer shall promptly report to the General Counsel or the CEO andto the Audit Committee any information he or she may have about violations ofthese procedures, including any actual or apparent conflicts of interestbetween personal and professional relationships, involving any member of theCompany’s management or other employees who have a significant role in theCompany’s financial reporting, disclosures or internal controls.

 

5.                                       The CEO and eachFinancial Officer shall promptly bring to the attention of the General Counselor the CEO and to the Audit Committee any information he or she may haveregarding evidence of a material violation by the Company or any agent thereofof the securities or other laws, rules or regulations applicable to the Companyand the operation of its business.

 

6.                                       The Board ofDirectors shall determine, or designate appropriate persons to determine,appropriate actions to be taken in the event of violations of theseprocedures.  Such actions shall bereasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote accountability foradherence to this Code of Ethics.

 

1

----
----

CALL FOR APPLICATIONS HOUA-A-2004

(2004/C 194 A/02)

The European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) seeks candidates with a view to filling certain posts. Detailed information on these vacancies, the missions of the Centre and the procedure to be followed to prepare an application are published on the EUMC Internet site at the following address: http://eumc.eu.int.

----
#### § 2570.5 Consequences of default.

For prohibited transaction penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.5(b) of this title. Failure of the respondent to file an answer within the 30 day time period provided in § 18.5 of this title shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of his right to appear and contest the allegations of the notice, and such failure shall be deemed to be an admission of the facts as alleged in the notice for purposes of the prohibited transaction penalty proceeding. Such notice shall then become the final order of the Secretary, except that the administrative law judge may set aside a default entered under this provision where there is proof of defective notice.
%

CHRIS MOUNTAIN.
RDO = P
FS UNUTE APE n
hy :

tose
MRIS WOUNTAIN. COLOLAS

Serre
a

SCALE 1:48000 ©
2 3 4 | MILES ‘
1 l 1

ro

| EXPLANATION FOR CHRIS MOUNTAIN AND PAGOSA SPRINGS QUADRANGLES

Qal Qpg Qls

Alluviun Pediment gravels Landslide deposits
Valley-bottom alluvial
deposits and low-lying
terrace gravels

QUATERNARY

Holocene and
Pleistocene

Ki

Lewis Shale
Dark-gray clay shale;
contains rusty-weather-
ing concretionary mass- Kimv

es; thin sandstone
beds near top Lewis Shale and

Mesaverde Formation
undifferentiated

Kmv

Mesaverde Formation

Interbedded sandstone, shaly sandstone,
and dark clay shale

’

Kau
Knl

Mancos Shale
Kmu, upper part. Mostly dark shale; contains calcareous shale and argillaceous
limestone (Niobrara equivalent) within about 660 ft above base; also contains
sandy limestone and argillaceous sandstone (Juana Lopez Member ) at base
Kml, lower part. Mostly dark shale; contains thin calcareous shale and lime-
stone (Greenhorn equivalent) within 150 ft above base 3

Upper Cretaceous

CRETACEOUS

Kdb

Dakota Sandstone and Burro Canyon Formation undifferentiated yr
Dakota disconformably overlies Burro Canyon, Dakota Sandstone is light- :
gray to brown sandstone with interbedded siltstone and carbonaceous shale; -
commonly contains chert-pebble conglomerate or conglomeratic sandstone at i
base. Burro Canyon Formation is lenticular chert-pebble conglomerate and
green and gray claystone

Lower Cretaceous

Ju

Morrison Formation and Wanakah Formation undifferentiated
Morrison conformably overlies Wanakah. Morrison Formation comprises two
members: upper is Brushy Basin Member consisting mostly of varicolored 2
claystone and mudstone; lower is Salt Wash Member consisting of sandstone 5 _
with interbedded claystone and mudstone, Wanakah Formation comprises three :
members: Junction Creek Sandstone Member (questionably present in these
quadrangles), a middle member, and the Pony Express Member, Junction Creek
Sandstone Member is light-gray cross-bedded sandstone; middle member is ,
‘
"

Upper Jurassic

liny shale, siltstone, and sandstone; Pony Express Member is dark-gray bi-
tuminous Limestone, locally containing gypsum. Base of Wanakah not exposed
in these quadrangles
#### § 4050.307 PBGC discretion.

PBGC may in appropriate circumstances extend deadlines, excuse noncompliance, and grant waivers with regard to any provision of this subpart to promote the purposes of the missing participants program and title IV of ERISA. Like circumstances will be treated in like manner under this section.
## FAA MCAI AD WORKSHEET (CONTINUED) Contacts. W ith whom outs ide the FAA has th i s proposal been d i scussed? anizat ion Person Contacted Date Response National Business Aircraft Association Eli Colli 7/ 29114 Regional Airline

**A~sociation** 7 /29 1 14 Aircraft O"ncrs 

### & Pi lots Association Robert !-Iackman 7 / 29114 Airlines for A m er ica Robert Irela n d 7 / 2 9 11 4



### \