alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 21**

**LABARGE, INC.SUBSIDIARIES (All 100% Owned)**

 
| **Subsidiaries of the Registrant** |        | **State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |                                      |                                                  |
| LaBarge Electronics, Inc.          |                                      | Missouri                                         |
|                               |                                      |                                                  |
| LaBarge/STC, Inc.                  |                                      | Texas                                            |
|                               |                                      |                                                  |
| LaBarge Acquisition Company, Inc.  |                                      | Missouri                                         |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           1,242
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,488
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   518
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   617
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      2,614
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         13,804
<ALLOWANCE>                                        478
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,519
<DEPOSITS>                                      15,331
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,538
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                275
<LONG-TERM>                                        710
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         98
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,567
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  20,519
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,201
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  143
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   128
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,472
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 465
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 597
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              875
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      167
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  12
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    669
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    355
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         292
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       292
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.06
<LOANS-NON>                                        381
<LOANS-PAST>                                        60
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    13
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   495
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      241
<RECOVERIES>                                        56
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  478
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               216
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 28
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            234
        

</TABLE>
#### § 452.79 Opportunity to campaign.

There must be a reasonable period prior to the election during which office-seekers and their supporters may engage in the campaigning that the Act contemplates and guarantees. What is a reasonable period of time would depend upon the circumstances, including the method of nomination and the size of the union holding the election, both in terms of the number of members and the geographic area in which it operates. For example, a candidate for office in a local labor organization was improperly disqualified and then appealed to the international union which directed that his name be placed on the ballot. A complaint was considered properly filed alleging election violations because the candidate's name was restored to the ballot two days prior to the election so that he was denied an equal opportunity to campaign. Similarly, in a mail ballot election a union's delay in the distribution of campaign literature until after the ballots have been distributed and some have been cast would not satisfy the requirement to distribute such literature in compliance with a reasonable request.[40] Such a delay would deny the candidate a reasonable opportunity to campaign prior to the election and would thus not meet the requirement for adequate safeguards to insure a fair election. Where access to the convention floor is limited exclusively to delegates at a convention at which officers are to be elected, there must, nevertheless, be equal opportunity for all nominees to campaign. Thus, if the privilege of addressing the convention is accorded to any of the nominees, it must be accorded to all nominees who request it, whether they are delegates or not.

###### Footnotes -
  452.79

[40] *Wirtz* v. *American Guild of Variety Artists,* 267 F. Supp. 527 (S.D.N.Y. 1967).
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11336 Conference Calendar

ROBERT EUGENE KRAMER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus RONALD DREWRY, Senior Warden, et al., Defendants, CLYDE HARGROVE, Captain; VIRGINIA L. COLE, Nurse, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:95-CV-18-BA

- - - - - - - - - - August 15, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Robert Eugene Kramer, Texas prisoner #643733, appeals the magistrate judge’s grant of summary judgment as to appellees Clyde Hargrove and Virginia L. Cole. Kramer argues that Cole was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs when she refused to excuse him from work. Kramer further argues thatNo. 96-11336 -2- Hargrove violated his due process rights when he refused to consider Kramer’s entire medical file in upholding the disciplinary report Kramer received for refusing to report to work. We have reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions and AFFIRM the magistrate judge’s dismissal for essentially the same reasons set forth by the magistrate judge. Kramer v. Drewry , No. 1:95-CV-18-BA (Sept. 24, 1996). To the extent that Kramer seeks the appointment of appellate counsel, that request is DENIED. Ulmer v. Chancellor , 691 F.2d 209, 212-13 (5th Cir. 1982).
AFFIRMED.
#### § 1977.4 Persons prohibited from discriminating.

Section 11(c) specifically states that “no person shall discharge or in any manner discriminate against any employee” because the employee has exercised rights under the Act. Section 3(4) of the Act defines “person” as “one or more individuals, partnerships, associations, corporations, business trusts, legal representatives, or any group of persons.” Consequently, the prohibitions of section 11(c) are not limited to actions taken by employers against their own employees. A person may be chargeable with discriminatory action against an employee of another person. Section 11(c) would extend to such entities as organizations representing employees for collective bargaining purposes, employment agencies, or any other person in a position to discriminate against an employee. See, *Meek* v. *United States,* 136 F. 2d 679 (6th Cir., 1943); *Bowe* v. *Judson C. Burns,* 137 F. 2d 37 (3rd Cir., 1943).
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 102 (Thursday, May 25, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 34012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13197]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[AD-FRL-6706-2]


National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for 
Source Categories

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of interpretative rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is withdrawing the interpretative rule published in 
the Federal Register on April 21, 2000, at 65 FR 21363. That 
interpretative rule was intended to clarify the construction by EPA of 
the applicability of sections 112(g) and 112(j) of the Clean Air Act 
(CAA) to all stationary combustion turbines and waste heat recovery 
units in combined cycle systems.
    An administrative error led to publication of a preliminary draft 
of the interpretative rule, rather than the final interpretative rule 
EPA intended to publish. Concurrent with this withdrawal of the 
incorrect version of the interpretative rule published on April 21, 
2000, EPA is publishing elsewhere in today's Federal Register a 
corrected version of the interpretative rule.

DATES: On May 25, 2000, EPA hereby withdraws the interpretative rule 
published at 65 FR 21363. The corrected interpretative rule will become 
legally effective on June 26, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, contact Sims 
Roy, Combustion Group, Emission Standards Division (MD-13), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 
27711, telephone number: (919) 541-5263, facsimile: (919) 541-5450, 
electronic mail address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e89a8791c69b81859ba88d9889c68f879e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a78657324796367794a6f7a6b246d657c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: May 18, 2000.
Robert Perciasepe,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 00-13197 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04331A024
(77 South. 58)

#### GILBREATH et al. v. COPELAND.

(8 Div. 401.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 13, 1917.)

Chattel Mortgages <&wkey;213 — Crop Mortgages — Suit by Assignee.

Where one took a rent note and crop mortgage, and sold and transferred them to another, and after they fell due and the crop had been sold purchased them back, he cannot recover for conversion of the crop, where he does not sue as assignee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall County; W. W. Haralson, Judge.

Action in conversion by V. H. Copeland against Alex. Gilbreath and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

Reversed and remanded.

Street & Bradford, of Guntersville, for appellants. W. C. Rayburn, of Guntersville, for appellee.

BRICKEN, J.

In February, 1912, Copeland rented certain land to Cleveland, who executed a rent note and crop mortgage of that date, payable to Copeland in November following; thereafter, in June of the same year, Copeland sold and transferred this note and mortgage to Moon; in December, 1912, Cleveland sold some cotton covered by said mortgage and note to the appellant Gil-breath; a month or so thereafter, according to the bill of exceptions, Moon went to Copeland and told him that he (Moon) had failed to collect the note, and demanded that Copeland take the note back and refund what Moon had paid for it; Copeland thereupon complied with this request, and thereafter, *221in March, 1013, instituted this suit against Gilbreath and another, for the conversion of the cotton and the destruction of the lien thereon, which it is alleged occurred on the 7th day of December, 1913.

In the first and second counts of the complaint it is averred that the cotton alleged to have been converted was the property of the plaintiff; in the third count it is charged that the defendants destroyed plaintiff’s lien thereon. The undisputed evidence shows that at the time of the alleged conversion and destruction of the lien Moon, and not the plaintiff, was the owner of the note and mortgage above referred to, and that plaintiff’s only claim to said cotton is based on that note and mortgage, which he reacquired, by purchase, after the alleged conversion, and after the alleged destruction of the lien. The court below therefore erred in refusing to give the affirmative charge requested in writing by the appellant. Union Iron Works v. Union Naval Stores Co., 157 Ala. 645, 47 South. 652; Foy v. Cochran, 88 Ala. 353, 6 South. 685; 38 Cyc. 2044.

It is unnecessary for us to determine whether or not Moon could assign his cause of action; the plaintiff does not sue as assignee, and the record contains no evidence of any such assignment.

The judgment appealed from is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 48862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20131]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than September 2, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Farmers and Merchants Bancshares, Inc., Crescent, Oklahoma; to 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Farmers & Merchants Bank, 
Crescent, Oklahoma.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 4, 
2011.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-20131 Filed 8-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Enstar Group, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,
certifies that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

                  /s/ Nimrod T. Frazer
--------------------------------------------------------
Nimrod T. Frazer
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
March 16, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Enstar Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Enstar Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 184 

Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to childhood stroke and 

designating May 5, 2007, as ‘‘National Childhood Stroke Awareness Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 1, 2007 

Mr. CHAMBLISS (for himself and Mr. CASEY) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to childhood 

stroke and designating May 5, 2007, as ‘‘National Childhood Stroke Awareness Day’’. 

Whereas a stroke, also known as a ‘‘cerebrovascular accident’’, is an acute neurologic injury that occurs when the 

blood supply to a part of the brain is interrupted by a 

clot in the artery or a burst of the artery; 

Whereas a stroke is a medical emergency that can cause permanent neurologic damage or even death if not promptly 

diagnosed and treated; 

Whereas 26 out of every 100,000 newborns and almost 3 out 

of every 100,000 children have a stroke each year; 

Whereas an individual can have a stroke before birth; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 184 ATS 

Whereas stroke is among the top 10 causes of death for children in the United States; 

Whereas 12 percent of all children who experience a stroke 

die as a result; 

Whereas the death rate for children who experience a stroke 

before the age of 1 year is the highest out of all age 

groups; 

Whereas many children who experience a stroke will suffer 

serious, long-term neurological disabilities, including— 

(1) hemiplegia, which is paralysis of 1 side of the 

body; 

(2) seizures; 

(3) speech and vision problems; and 

(4) learning difficulties; 

Whereas those disabilities may require ongoing physical therapy and surgeries; 

Whereas the permanent health concerns and treatments resulting from strokes that occur during childhood and 

young adulthood have a considerable impact on children, 

families, and society; 

Whereas very little is known about the cause, treatment, and 

prevention of childhood stroke; 

Whereas medical research is the only means by which the 

citizens of the United States can identify and develop effective treatment and prevention strategies for childhood 

stroke; 

Whereas early diagnosis and treatment of childhood stroke 

greatly improves the chances that the affected child will 

recover and not experience a recurrence; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 184 ATS 

Whereas the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia should be 

commended for its initiative in creating the Nation’s first 

program dedicated to pediatric stroke patients: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates May 5, 2007 as ‘‘National Child3 hood Stroke Awareness Day’’; and 

4 (2) urges the people of the United States to 

5 support the efforts, programs, services, and advocacy 

6 of organizations that work to enhance public aware7 ness of childhood stroke. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48873-48874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20176]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel, AD Mutation.
    Date: August 30, 2011.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 1:45 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Alicja L. Markowska, PhD, DSC, Scientific Review 
Branch, National Institute On Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 
2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9666, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8fe2eefde4e0f8fceecfe1e6eea1e1e6e7a1e8e0f9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbd6dac9d0d4ccc8dafbd5d2da95d5d2d395dcd4cd">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel, Registry For AD.
    Date: August 30, 2011.
    Time: 1:45 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Alicja L. Markowska, PHD, DSC, Scientific Review 
Branch, National Institute On Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 
2C212,

[[Page 48874]]

Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9666, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f19c90839a9e868290b19f9890df9f9899df969e87"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e885899a83879f9b89a8868189c6868180c68f879e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: August 3, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-20176 Filed 8-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>