alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ino'JFietanSii 1.4 0,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

AF 06-0090

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPOINTMENT OF A

MEMBER TO THE COMMISSION ON PRACTICE

OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF

MONTANA

FILED

MAR 1 9 2021

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

State of Montana

ORDER

Rule 2 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement provides that

appointments to the Commission on Practice shall be made by the Supreme Court from a

list of three licensed and practicing attorneys submitted to the Court who have received the

highest number of votes in an election by the Area resident members of the State Bar of

Montana. Rule 2 further provides that this Court shall, by order, designate the time, place,

and method for the election of members for appointment to the Commission on Practice.

The term of the current attorney member for Area C expires April 1, 2021. Area C

is now comprised of the Second, Third, and Fifth Judicial Districts.

THEREFORE,

IT IS NOW ORDERED:

1. An election shall be had in Area C for nomination of three resident bar members

whose names shall be submitted to this Court, and this Court shall then appoint one of the

three to membership on the Commission on Practice.

2. The election in Area C shall be the responsibility of District Judge Luke Berger.

3. The election shall be conducted in the following manner:

(a) At the discretion ofJudge Berger, the election may be conducted either by e-mail

or regular mail. Whether by e-mail or regular mail, the ballots shall be in the following

form:

03/19/2021

Case Number: AF 06-0090
1.

2.

3.

AREA C

Second, Third, and Fifth Judicial Districts

BALLOT FOR MEMBERS OF COMMISSION ON PRACTICE

(Vote for Three)

The election will close April 9, 2021. Your ballot must be returned so as to

reach its destination on or before that date. The names of the three attorneys

receiving the highest number of votes will be sent to the Montana Supreme

Court, which then will appoint one of them to the Commission.

********************

(b) Judge Berger shall prepare and distribute the ballots on or before March 26,

2021.

(c) Voted ballots must be returned to Judge Berger on or before April 9, 2021.

(d) The ballots are to be opened and counted by Judge Berger. Judge Berger shall

then certify to this Court the names of the three attorneys in Area C receiving the highest

number of votes on or before April 12, 2021.

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to the Honorable Luke Berger, to

each member of the Commission on Practice, and to Shelly Smith, Office Administrator

for the Commission on Practice.

DATED this 1 414-rjafa y of March, 2021.

For the Court,

Chief Justice

2
132 STAT. 1380 PUBLIC LAW 115–179—JUNE 1, 2018 

Public Law 115–179 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To allow the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians, 

the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon, the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon, the Confederated Tribes of Warm 

Springs, the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians, the Klamath Tribes, 

and the Burns Paiute Tribes to lease or transfer certain lands. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Oregon Tribal Economic Development Act’’. 

SEC. 2. APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED TO VALIDATE LAND TRANSACTIONS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 

without further approval, ratification, or authorization by the 

United States, the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, 

and Siuslaw Indians, the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde 

Community of Oregon, the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians 

of Oregon, the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs, the Cow 

Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians, the Klamath Tribes, 

and the Burns Paiute Tribes may lease, sell, convey, warrant, 

or otherwise transfer all or any part of its interests in any real 

property that is not held in trust by the United States for the 

benefit of such tribe. 

(b) TRUST LAND NOT AFFECTED.—Nothing in this section shall— 

(1) authorize the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower 

Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians, the Confederated Tribes of the 

Grand Ronde Community of Oregon, the Confederated Tribes 

of Siletz Indians of Oregon, the Confederated Tribes of Warm 

Springs, the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians, 

the Klamath Tribes, and the Burns Paiute Tribes to lease, 

sell, convey, warrant, or otherwise transfer all or any part 

of an interest in any real property that is held in trust by 

the United States for the benefit of such tribe; or 

Oregon Tribal 

Economic 

Development Act. 

June 1, 2018 

[S. 1285] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
PUBLIC LAW 115–179—JUNE 1, 2018 132 STAT. 1381 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1285 (H.R. 3225): 

HOUSE REPORTS: Nos. 115–507 and 115–564, accompanying H.R. 3225, (both 

from Comm. on Natural Resources). 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 115–175 (Comm. on Indian Affairs). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 163 (2017): Nov. 29, considered and passed Senate. 

Vol. 164 (2018): May 15, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

(2) affect the operation of any law governing leasing, 

selling, conveying, warranting, or otherwise transferring any 

interest in such trust land. 

Approved June 1, 2018. 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
§ 4000.30 What if I need to resend my filing or issuance for technical reasons? ( a ) *Request to resubmit* — ( 1 ) *Filing.* We may ask you to resubmit all or a portion of your filing for technical reasons (for example, because we are unable to open an attachment to your e-mail). In that case, your submission (or portion) is invalid. However, if you comply with the request or otherwise resolve the problem (e.g., by providing advice that allows us to open the attachment to your e-mail) by the date we specify, your filing date for the submission (or portion) that we asked you to resubmit is the date you filed your original submission. If you comply with our request late, your submission (or portion) will be treated as filed on the date of your resubmission.
( 2 ) *Issuance.* The intended recipient may, for good reason (of a technical nature), ask you to resend all or a portion of your issuance (for example, because of a technical problem in opening an attachment to your e-mail). In that case, your issuance (or portion) is invalid. However, if you comply with the request or otherwise resolve the problem (e.g., by providing advice that the recipient uses to open the attachment to your e-mail), within a reasonable time, your issuance date for the issuance (or portion) that the intended recipient asked you to resend is the date you provided your original issuance. If you comply with the request late, your issuance (or portion) will be treated as provided on the date of your reissuance.
( b ) *Reason to believe submission or issuance not received or defective.* If you have reason to believe that we have not received your submission (or have received it in a form that is not useable), or that the intended recipient has not received your issuance (or has received it in a form that is not useable), you must promptly resend your submission or issuance to get your original filing or issuance date. However, we may require evidence to support your original filing or issuance date. If you are not prompt, or you do not provide us with any evidence we may require to support your original filing or issuance date, your filing or issuance date is the filing or issuance date of your resubmission or reissuance.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC. (REGISTRANT)
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          I, David B. Swank, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,  certify
to the best of my knowledge and belief pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:

         (3)       The  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ended
                   March 31,  2004,  which  this  statement  accompanies,  fully
                   complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (4)       The  information  contained in the  Quarterly  Report on Form
                   10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects,   the
                   financial   condition   and  result  of   operations  of  the
                   Registrant.


Date:  May 13, 2004                                /s/ DAVID B. SWANK
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   David B. Swank
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   (Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70002-70003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28729]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 2010-0052]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review and Comments Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: Notice of Claim and Proof of Loss, Medium Term 
Guarantee.

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (``Ex-Im Bank'') 
is the

[[Page 70003]]

official export credit agency of the United States. Its mission is to 
create and sustain U.S. jobs by financing U.S. exports through direct 
loans, guarantees, insurance and working capital credits. By 
neutralizing the effect of export credit support offered by foreign 
governments and by absorbing credit risks that the private sector will 
not accept, Ex-Im Bank enables U.S. exporters to compete fairly in 
foreign markets on the basis of price and product. Under the Medium 
Term Guarantee Program, Ex-Im Bank provides guarantees of principal and 
interest on floating or fixed-rate loans by eligible lenders to credit 
worthy buyers of U.S. goods and services. The guarantee covers the 
repayment risks on the foreign buyer's debt obligations. Ex-Im Bank 
guarantees that, in the event of a payment default by the borrower, it 
will repay the lender the outstanding principal and interest on the 
loan.
    In the event that a borrower defaults on a transaction guaranteed 
by Ex-Im Bank the guaranteed lender may seek payment by the submission 
of a claim. This collection of information is necessary, pursuant to 12 
U.S.C. 635(a)(1), to determine if such claim complies with the terms 
and conditions of the relevant guarantee agreement.
    This form can be reviewed http://www.exim.gov/pub/pending/EIB-10-05-Claim-Filing-Form-Guarantees.pdf.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before January 18, 2011 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments maybe submitted electronically on http://www.regulations.gov or by mail to Michele Kuester, Export Import Bank 
of the United States, 811 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20571.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Titles and Form Number: Notice of Claim and 
Proof of Loss, Medium Term Guarantee (EIB 10-05).
    OMB Number: 3048-XXXX.
    Type of Review: New.
    Need and Use: This collection provides Ex-Im Bank staff with the 
information necessary to process the filing of a claim for a defaulted 
transaction under Ex-Im Bank's Medium Term Guarantee program.
    Number of Respondents: 65.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-28729 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
#### Irma Silfverschiold et al., Respondents, v Hut Cab Corp. et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[698 NYS2d 480]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Davis, J., and a jury), entered February 23, 1999, awarding damages, before structuring, in favor of plaintiff Silfverschiold of *148$750,000 for past pain and suffering and $1,000,000 for future pain and suffering, in favor of plaintiff Hvistendahl of $600,000 for past pain and suffering and $850,000 for future pain and suffering, and in favor of plaintiff Store of $250,000 for past pain and suffering and $250,000 for future pain and suffering, unanimously modified, on the facts, to vacate awards for future pain and suffering as to plaintiffs Silfverschiold and Hvistendahl and direct a new trial on the issue of their' damages for future pain and suffering, and otherwise affirmed, without costs, unless said plaintiffs, within *30*days of the date of this order, stipulate to reduce the awards for future pain and suffering, respectively, to $850,000 in favor of plaintiff Silfverschiold, and $700,000 in favor of plaintiff Hvistendahl, and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith.

The awards for future pain and suffering as to said two plaintiffs deviate materially from what is reasonable compensation to the extent indicated *(cf., Po Yee So v Wing Tat Realty,*259 AD2d 373; *Salop v City of New*York, 246 AD2d 305; *Zavurov v City of New York,*241 AD2d 491). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli and Friedman, JJ.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crdentia Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, James D.
Durham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

         1.       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

         2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
                  indicated.


This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


Date:  May 17, 2004                           By:  /s/  James D. Durham
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                        James D. Durham
                                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                       22
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 21


                          LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION
                     SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
                     ======================================


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    State or Province         Percent of
       Name                          of Incorporation         Ownership
       ----                         -----------------         ----------
<S>                                      <C>                     <C>
Colony Printing & Labeling, Inc.         Indiana                 100%
Dee Zee, Inc.                            Ohio                    100%
Fostoria Glass Company                   West Virginia           100%
Indiana Glass Company                    Indiana                 100%
LRV Acquisition Corp.                    Ohio                    100%
LaGrange Molded Products, Inc.           Delaware                100%
Lancaster Colony Commercial
 Products, Inc.                          Ohio                    100%
Lancaster Glass Corporation              Ohio                    100%
New York Frozen Foods, Inc.              Ohio                    100%
Pretty Products, Inc.                    Ohio                    100%
T. Marzetti Company                      Ohio                    100%
The Quality Bakery Company, Inc.         Ohio                    100%
Reames Foods, Inc.                       Iowa                    100%
Waycross Molded Products, Inc.           Ohio                    100%
</TABLE>

All subsidiaries conduct their business under the names shown.
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

§ 4.130 Types of covered service contracts illustrated. ( a ) The types of contracts, the principal purpose of which is to furnish services through the use of service employees, are too numerous and varied to permit an exhaustive listing. The following list is illustrative, however, of the types of services called for by such contracts that have been found to come within the coverage of the Act. Other examples of covered contracts are discussed in other sections of this subpart. ( 1 ) Aerial spraying.
( 2 ) Aerial reconnaissance for fire detection.
( 3 ) Ambulance service.
( 4 ) Barber and beauty shop services.
( 5 ) Cafeteria and food service.
( 6 ) Carpet laying (other than part of construction) and cleaning.
( 7 ) Cataloging services.
( 8 ) Chemical testing and analysis.
( 9 ) Clothing alteration and repair.
( 10 ) Computer services.
( 11 ) Concessionaire services.
( 12 ) Custodial, janitorial, and housekeeping services.
( 13 ) Data collection, processing, and/or analysis services.
( 14 ) Drafting and illustrating.
( 15 ) Electronic equipment maintenance and operation and engineering support services.
( 16 ) Exploratory drilling (other than part of construction).
( 17 ) Film processing.
( 18 ) Fire fighting and protection.
( 19 ) Fueling services.
( 20 ) Furniture repair and rehabilitation.
( 21 ) Geological field surveys and testing.
( 22 ) Grounds maintenance.
( 23 ) Guard and watchman security service.
( 24 ) Inventory services.
( 25 ) Keypunching and keyverifying contracts.
( 26 ) Laboratory analysis services.
( 27 ) Landscaping (other than part of construction).
( 28 ) Laundry and dry cleaning.
( 29 ) Linen supply services.
( 30 ) Lodging and/or meals.
( 31 ) Mail hauling.
( 32 ) Mailing and addressing services.
( 33 ) Maintenance and repair of all types of equipment, e.g., aircraft, engines, electrical motors, vehicles, and electronic, telecommunications, office and related business, and construction equipment (See § 4.123(e).).
( 34 ) Mess attendant services.
( 35 ) Mortuary services.
( 36 ) Motor pool operation.
( 37 ) Nursing home services.
( 38 ) Operation, maintenance, or logistic support of a Federal facility.
( 39 ) Packing and crating.
( 40 ) Parking services.
( 41 ) Pest control.
( 42 ) Property management.
( 43 ) Snow removal.
( 44 ) Stenographic reporting.
( 45 ) Support services at military installations.
( 46 ) Surveying and mapping services (not directly related to construction).
( 47 ) Taxicab services.
( 48 ) Telephone and field interview services.
( 49 ) Tire and tube repairs.
( 50 ) Transporting property or personnel (except as explained in § 4.118).
( 51 ) Trash and garbage removal.
( 52 ) Tree planting and thinning, clearing timber or brush, etc. (See also §§ 4.116(b) and 4.131(f).).
( 53 ) Vending machine services.
( 54 ) Visual and graphic arts.
( 55 ) Warehousing or storage.
May 2015

Jason Youn Photography LLC

2342 W. 8th Ave

Mesa AZ 85202

Help@JasonYoun.com

480-207-7209

Dear Sir or Madam, 

Jason Youn Photography LLC would like to submit the following as an 

amendment to Docket No FAA-2014-0233.

This is a petition to amend Exemption No. 11452:

Due to rapidly advancing UAS technology in both performance and safety 

mechanisms, Jason Youn Photography would like to amend Exemption No. 11452 to 

include more aircraft than are listed in the original exemption. 

These new unmanned aircraft (UAS) have several added safety mechanisms 

including but not limited to:

*Ground looking cameras for more stability in flight. 

*More accurate GPS systems for greater reliability. 

*More reliable lifting motors to run the thrust propulsion systems. 

*More reliable computer based Engine Control Units.

*Higher resolution video feeds to ground for greater situational awareness. 

*More flight data sent to the ground controls for grater situational awareness. 

*More reliable fail safe features for greater safety on the ground. 

! ! In recognition that technological innovations in safety advance at a rate 

that so rapid that there does exist a continual need for renewed amendments as new 

safety mechanisms become available, Jason Youn Photography llc would like to petition 

the FAA to amend Exemption No. 11452 so that all commercially available UASs under 

55 pounds within Visual line of sight (VLOS) not to exceed 87 knots (100mph) and are 

in compliance with all provisions of Proposed Part 107 are included in the exemption.

The above paragraph is in keeping with the FAA’s publicly stated goal of maintaining 

flexibility to accommodate future technological innovation. 

Yours, 

Jason Youn

Jason Youn Photography LLC 

Petition to amend Exemption No. 11452
p110532.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0532

Focus Ready Draft 8/8/2011

ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ AH

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (08/02/2011):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

PMN: Health 1-2, Eco 3. Deg Pdt: Health 2, Eco 3.

Migration to groundwater: Moderate

PBT rating: P3B3T2 PMN: P3B3T1; Deg Pdt: P3B3T2

Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 2ppb)

Page 1
p110532.eng

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3A

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

 

Page 2
p110532.eng

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0532

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 3
p110532.eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 4
p110532.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0532

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 5
p110532.eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 6
p110532.eng

Page 7