alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 4002.6 Conflict of interest. ( a ) *Board Members and Director.* The Board Members and the Director must work with their respective ethics office to identify actual or potential conflicts of interest under 18 U.S.C. 208 or section 4002(j) of ERISA or the appearance of the loss of impartiality under 5 CFR 2635.502.
( b ) *Disqualification.* A Board Member and the Director must notify the Board Members of disqualification in any decision or activity based on a conflict of interest under paragraph (a) of this section. To the extent a matter is delegable under these bylaws, the disqualified Board Member's Board Representative, acting independently of that Member, may vote on the matter in the Member's place. The disqualified Board Member may not ratify any action taken on the matter giving rise to his or her disqualification.
#### § 778.330 Prizes or contest awards generally.

All compensation (except statutory exclusions) paid by or on behalf of an employer to an employee as remuneration for employment must be included in the regular rate, whether paid in the form of cash or otherwise. Prizes are therefore included in the regular rate if they are paid to an employee as remuneration for employment. If therefore it is asserted that a particular prize is not to be included in the regular rate, it must be shown either that the prize was not paid to the employee for employment, or that it is not a thing of value which is part of wages.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

JAMIE JERMAINE BROWN , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2278

[ March 29, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Gary L. Sweet , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 56

- 2015

- CF

- 000478

- B and 56

- 2016

- CF

- 002437

- A

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender and Anthony Calvello, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

G ROSS , T AYLOR and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
<LEGEND>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 27.1
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS REPORT ON 
FORM 10-K, FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN 
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             700
<SECURITIES>                                    71,702
<RECEIVABLES>                                      484
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,506
<PP&E>                                             103
<DEPRECIATION>                                      57
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,437
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,664
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,932
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,875
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,976
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,138
<INCOME-TAX>                                       221
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,917
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,917
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.49
        

</TABLE>
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 12:32 PM

To: 'dronezone.llc@gmail.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Informat ion - Drone Zone, LLC [FAA-2014-0897]

Dear Mr. Scott Zimmerman:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2014

‐ 0897). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

• Describe the aircraft make(s) and model(s) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include

the following: size, maximum weight (including payload), and aircraft type (i.e.

‐ fixed

‐ wing,rotorcraft, lighter

‐ than

‐ air). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

• Provide information regarding the radio frequency spectrum(s). FCC approved? This information can be

located in the aircraft manual(s).

• Provide a description of the proposed airmen medical requirements.

• Your petition references a pre

‐ flight briefing and/or checklist. Describe the process used to determine if the

UAS is airworthy and in safe condition for operation in the NAS.

• Describe the process used to document UAS discrepancies and the corrective action taken in the aircraft

record. Examples of processes include (1) the petitioner has elected to use its own process to maintain its UAS and

ensure that only airworthy and safe UAS will be allowed to operate in the NAS and (2) the petitioner has elected to

maintain its UAS in accordance with the manufacturer maintenance and inspection recommendations.

• Your petition references the material listed below, however the material was not submitted for the

record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

o Flight operations manual

Please submit the additional information (non

‐ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

‐ mail to jake.troutman@faa.gov

. If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 2/18/2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 9521
§ 4901.12 Description of information requested. ( a ) *In general.* Each disclosure request should reasonably describe the record or records sought in sufficient detail to permit identification and location with a reasonable amount of effort. So far as practicable, the request should specify the subject matter of the record, the place where and date or approximate date when made, the person or office that made it, and any other pertinent identifying details.
( b ) *Deficient descriptions.* ( 1 ) If the description is insufficient to enable a professional employee familiar with the subject area of the disclosure request to locate the record with a reasonable amount of effort, the Disclosure Officer will notify the requester and, to the extent possible, indicate the additional information required. PBGC will make every reasonable effort to assist a requester in the identification and location of the record or records sought. PBGC will not withhold records merely because of difficulty in finding them.
( 2 ) A requester who is attempting to modify or reformulate a disclosure request may discuss the request with a FOIA Public Liaison, who is available to assist the requester in reasonably describing the records sought. If the requester fails to reasonably describe the records sought, PBGC's response to the request may be delayed or denied.
( 3 ) Any amended disclosure request must meet the requirements for a request under paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Requests for categories of records.* Disclosure requests calling for all records falling within a reasonably specific category will be regarded as reasonably described within the meaning of this section and section 552(a)(3) of FOIA if PBGC is reasonably able to determine which records come within the request and to search for and collect them without unduly interfering with PBGC operations. If PBGC operations would be unduly disrupted, the Disclosure Officer will promptly notify the requester and provide an opportunity to confer in an attempt to reduce the request to manageable proportions.
[61 FR 34123, July 1, 1996, as amended at 87 FR 43995, July 25, 2022]
(75 South. 824)

#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

(4 Div. 492.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 29, 1917.

Rehearing Denied June 12, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Crenshaw County; A. E. Gamble, Judge.

John M. Johnson was convicted of an offense, and he appeals.

Reversed and rendered.

D. A. Baker, of Troy, and J. A. Carnley, of Enterprise, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., Powell & Hamilton, of 'Greenville, and E. B. Bricken, of Luverne, for the State.

BROWN, P. J.

On the authority of Thomas v. State, 75 South. 821,1 present term, the judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and a judgment here rendered discharging the defendant.

Reversed and rendered.

1

Ante, p. 145,
#### § 530.10 Delegation of authority to grant, deny, or cancel an individual homeworker certificate.

The Administrator may from time to time designate and appoint members of the Administrator's staff or State Agencies as his authorized representatives with full power and authority to grant, deny, or cancel homework certificates.

[43 FR 28470, June 30, 1978]
#### § 575.2 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*Act* means the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (52 Stat. 1060, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 201, *et seq.*).

*Administrator* means the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor, and includes an authorized representative designated by the Administrator to perform any of the functions of the Administrator under this part.

*Agriculture* means agriculture as defined in section 3(f) of the Act and as interpreted in part 780 of this chapter.

*Commute daily* means the minors shall travel by foot, car, or other vehicle designed for transporting passengers from their permanent residences to the field or farm where they will work and return thereto at the end of each workday.

*Department* means the U.S. Department of Labor.

*Employer* means employer as defined in section 3(d) of the Act.

*Group of employers* means a number of employers who seek to be considered together for the purpose of applying for a waiver under section 13(c)(4) of the Act.

*Hand-harvest laborers* means agricultural workers engaged solely in harvesting by hand soil grown crops such as but not limited to berries, potatoes, and beans, and as interpreted in § 780.312 of this chapter.

*Outside school hours* means such periods as determined by the school district of the minor's permanent residence. These periods include before or after school hours, holidays, summer vacation, Saturdays, Sundays, or any other days on which the school for the school district does not assemble.

*Permanent residence* means the place where the minor and the minor's parent or person standing in place of a parent reside year-round.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, or an authorized representative of the Secretary.

*Waiver* means a letter signed by the Administrator advising the named employer or group of employers that 10 and 11 year old minors may be employed in the hand-harvesting of the specified short season crop or crops for the period designated, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in section 13(c)(4) of the Act and this part.

[43 FR 26562, June 21, 1978; 43 FR 28471, June 30, 1978, as amended at 82 FR 2229, Jan. 9, 2017]
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pick-Ups Plus, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Company.

Date:  August 21, 2006               By:
                                                --------------------------------
                                     Name:    Merritt Jesson
                                     Title:   Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pick-Ups Plus, Inc. and
will be retained by Pick-Ups Plus, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SCWC-19-0000452 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

WILLIE JAMES JONES, P etitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs. STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS ( CAAP-19-0000452; S.P.P. NO. 17-1-0012; CR. NO. 1PC950001384) ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ., a nd Circuit Judge Loo, in place of McKenna, J., recused)It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the abovereferenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court of Appeals at the time the application for writ of certiorari was filed, see Hawai # i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (2017)); see also Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2016),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/PetitionerAppellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed March 11, 2021, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2017) (“The application shall be Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-19-0000452 16-MAR-2021 09:45 AM Dkt. 11 ODSACfiled within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate

court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is extended in accordance with this rule.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, March 16, 2021. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Rhonda I.L. Loo

2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 102 (Thursday, May 25, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12819]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Parts 91, 93, 121 and 135

[Docket No. FAA-1999-5926; Amendment Nos. 91-263, 93-80, 121-274 and 
135-75]
RIN 2120-AG74


Modification of the Dimensions of the Grand Canyon National Park 
Special Flight Rules Area and Flight Free Zones; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the final rule, 
published in the Federal Register on April 4, 2000 (65 FR 17736). That 
final rule amends special operating rules and airspace for those 
persons operating aircraft in the area designated as the Grand Canyon 
National Park Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA). That rule assists the 
National Park Service in fulfilling the statutory mandate of 
substantial restoration of the natural quiet and experience of the 
park.

DATES: This correction is effective December 1, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin C. Willis, (202) 267-8741.

Correction of Publication

    In final rule FR Doc. 00-7950, beginning on page 17736 in the 
Federal Register issue of April 4, 2000, make the following correction:

    1. On page 17736, in column 1, in the heading section, beginning on 
line 4, correct ``Amendment No. 93-80'' to read ``Amendment Nos. 91-
263, 93-80, 121-274 and 135-75''.

    Issued in Washington, DC on May 15, 2000.
Donald P. Byrne,
Assistant Chief Counsel, Regulations Division.
[FR Doc. 00-12819 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
§ 502.5 Investigation authority of Secretary. ( a ) *General.* The Secretary, either pursuant to a complaint or otherwise, shall, as may be appropriate, investigate and, in connection therewith, enter and inspect such places (including housing) and such vehicles, and such records (and make transcriptions thereof), question such persons and gather such information as deemed necessary by the Secretary to determine compliance with contractual obligations under sec. 218 of the INA or these regulations.
( b ) *Failure to cooperate with an investigation.* Where any employer (or employer's agent or attorney) using the services of an H-2A worker does not cooperate with an investigation concerning the employment of H-2A workers or U.S. workers hired in corresponding employment, the WHD shall report such occurrence to ETA and may recommend that ETA revoke the existing certification that is the basis for the employment of the H-2A workers giving rise to the investigation, and the WHD may recommend to ETA the debarment of the employer from future certification for up to 3 years. In addition, the WHD may take such action as may be appropriate, including the seeking of an injunction and/or assessing civil money penalties, against any person who has failed to permit the WHD to make an investigation.
( c ) *Confidential investigation.* The Secretary shall conduct investigations in a manner that protects the confidentiality of any complainant or other person who provides information to the Secretary in good faith.
( d ) *Report of violations.* Any person may report a violation of the work contract obligations of sec. 218 of the INA or these regulations to the Secretary by advising any local office of the SWA, ETA, WHD, or any other authorized representative of the Secretary. The office or person receiving such a report shall refer it to the appropriate office of DOL, WHD for the geographic area in which the reported violation is alleged to have occurred.
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-06435, No. 333-105219, No 333-125833, No. 333-132767, No. 333-132768 andPost-Effective Amendment No. 1 to 333-132768 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-127213 on Form S-3 of our reports dated November 29, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Lee Enterprises, Incorporatedand subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, *Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension andOther Postretirement Plans*) and the effectiveness of Lee Enterprises, Incorporated and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lee Enterprises, Incorporated and subsidiariesfor the year ended September 30, 2007. 

 

/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Davenport, Iowa 

November 29, 2007
#### § 452.15 Effect of trusteeship.

Establishment of a valid trusteeship may have the effect of suspending the operation of the election provisions of the Act. When the autonomy otherwise available to a subordinate labor organization has been suspended consistent with the provisions of title III of the Act, officers of the organization under trusteeship may be relieved of their duties and temporary officers appointed by the trustee if necessary to assist him in carrying out the purposes for which the trusteeship was established. However, when a regular election of officers or an election for purposes of terminating the trusteeship is being held during the trusteeship, title IV would apply.
791 A.2d 1153

#### TRIBUNE-REVIEW PUBLISHING COMPANY, and WPXI, Respondents v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

March 8, 2002.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2002, the petition for allowance of appeal is hereby granted. The order of the Commonwealth Court is vacated and the matter is remanded for reconsideration in light of *LaValle v. Office of General Counsel,*564 Pa. 482, 769 A.2d 449 (2001).
#### ROY W. DRIER v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. 45601.

Decided April 2, 1945]

*Mr. Rees B. Gillespie*for the plaintiff.

*Mr. Louis R.*Mehlinger, with whom was *Mr. Assistant Attorney General Francis M.*Shea, for the defendant

*740The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover in an opinion *per*ewriam,, as follows:

*Per Curiam:*

The facts in this case are not in dispute- and show conclusively that plaintiff’s mother was dependent upon hfm for her chief support during the period involved. Plaintiff is entitled to recover. Entry of judgment will be suspended pending the filing of a report from the General Accounting Office showing the amount due in accordance with the foregoing special findings of facts and the opinion. *Mumma*v. *United States,*99 C. Cls. 261; *Herrick*v. *United*States, 100 C. Cls. 308.

Upon a report from the General Accounting Office showing the amount due plaintiff in accordance with the above *741opinion to be $1,128.80, and upon plaintiff’s motion for judgment, it was ordered June 4, 1945, that judgment be-entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,128.80.