alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A1090. SHANITA R. GRAY v. JEFFREY COOPER et al.

Shanita Gray filed a medical malpractice claim against Dr. Jeffrey Cooper and

Cooper Pediatrics. On July 2, 2019, the trial court dismissed the complaint based

upon Gray’sfailure to file an expert affidavit. Gray filed a motion for reconsideration,

which the trial court denied on July 30, 2019. On August 26, 2019, Gray filed this

direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the entry of the trial

court’s order. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). “The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal

is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon an appellate court.” Perlman

v. Perlman, 318 Ga. App. 731, 739 (4) (734 SE2d 560) (2012) (punctuation omitted).

The filing of a motion for reconsideration does not extend the time for filing a notice

of appeal, and the denial of a motion for reconsideration is not itself a directly

appealable order. See Bell v. Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 511 (536 SE2d 187) (2000);

Savage v. Newsome, 173 Ga. App. 271, 271 (326 SE2d 5) (1985). Here, Gray’s notice

of appeal, was filed 55 days after entry of the order dismissing her complaint. The

notice of appeal is thus untimely.

February 10, 2020
For these reasons, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/10/2020
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 858 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 858

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the transportation 
                  fringe benefit to bicycle commuters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 13, 2007

Mr. Wyden (for himself, Ms. Snowe, Ms. Collins, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Menendez, 
Mr. Inouye, Mr. Durbin, and Mr. Sanders) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the transportation 
                  fringe benefit to bicycle commuters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bicycle Commuters Benefits Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TRANSPORTATION FRINGE BENEFIT TO BICYCLE 
              COMMUTERS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 132(f) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to general rule for qualified 
transportation fringe) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) Bicycle commuting allowance.''.
    (b) Bicycle Commuting Allowance Defined.--Paragraph (5) of section 
132(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to definitions) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(F) Bicycle commuting allowance.--The term 
                `bicycle commuting allowance' means an amount provided 
                to an employee for transportation on a bicycle if such 
                transportation is in connection with travel between the 
                employee's residence and place of employment.''.
    (c) Limitation on Exclusion.--Subparagraph (A) of section 132(f)(2) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limitation on 
exclusion) is amended by striking ``subparagraphs (A) and (B)'' and 
inserting ``subparagraphs (A), (B), and (D)''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2007.
                                 <all>
```
No. 07-14-00011-CR

Michael Chamberlain

 Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

 Appellee

§

§

§

§

From the 100th District Court

 of Carson County

April 16, 2015

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated April 16, 2015, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the judgment of the trial court is reformed as set forth in the opinion

and affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have already been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

FILE COPY
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

Nos. 06

- 14

- 00116

- CR & 06

- 14

- 00117

- CR

JOSEPH JOHN GRUBBS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th District Court Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 29,417 & 29,725

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 

### O RDER Court reporter Julie Vrooman recorded the trial court proceedings in cause numbers 06

- 14

- 00116

- CR and 06

- 14

- 00117

- CR, styled Joseph John Grubbs v. The State of Texas , trial court cause numbers 29,417 and 29,725, in the 354th Judicial District Court of Hunt Count y, Texas. The reporter’s records were originally due in these matters October 31, 2014. This deadline was extended twice by this Court on Vrooman’s request, resulting in the most recent due date of January 2, 2015. Vrooman has now filed a third request seeking an additional extension of the filing deadline. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure establish that “trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 35.3(c). The Rules further instruct that an “appellate court may enter any order necessary to ensure the timely filing of the appellate record.” Id. In furtherance of our responsibilities established by the Rules, we find we must take steps to ensure that the records in t hese cases are filed in a reasonable amount of time. Therefore, we overrule Vrooman’s third request for an extension of the filing deadline and hereby order her to file the reporter’s records in cause numbers 06

- 14

- 00116

- CR and 06

- 14

- 00117

- CR, styled Jose ph John Grubbs v. The State of Texas , trial court cause numbers 29,417 and 29,725, in the 354th Judicial District Court of Hunt County, Texas, to be received by this Court no later than Monday, February 2, 2015.3 If the record s are not received by February 2, we warn Vrooman that we may begin contempt proceedings and order her to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of this Cour t for failing to obey its order

. IT IS SO ORDERED. BY THE COURT Date: January 14, 2015
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
  In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Trans Max
Technologies, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, I certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:
 
 (1)
    the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Trans Max Technologies, Inc. for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 (2)
    the
      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2005, fairly presents in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Trans Max
      Technologies, Inc. 
 By:
    /s/
      Raymond
      BrouzesName:
    Dr. Raymond BrouzesTitle:
    Principal Executive Officer,
      Principal Financial Officer and DirectorDate:
    May 23, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                           PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
iVillage Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2002, the undersigned, Douglas W.
McCormick, Chief Executive Officer of iVillage Inc., and Scott Levine, Chief
Financial Officer of iVillage Inc., each hereby severally certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)               such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
                  30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)               the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
                  10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of iVillage Inc.


August 14, 2002                       /s/ Douglas W. McCormick
------------------------------        -----------------------------------
Date                                  Douglas W. McCormick
                                      Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2002                       /s/ Scott Levine
------------------------------        -----------------------------------
Date                                  Scott Levine
                                      Chief Financial Officer
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 180 

Recognizing the 70th anniversary of the Idaho Potato Commission and 

designating May 2007 as ‘‘Idaho Potato Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 1, 2007 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself and Mr. CRAIG) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 70th anniversary of the Idaho Potato Commission and designating May 2007 as ‘‘Idaho Potato 

Month’’. 

Whereas the State of Idaho produces roughly one-third of all 

the potatoes grown in the United States, harvesting an 

average of 12,000,000,000 to 14,000,000,000 pounds annually; 

Whereas the State of Idaho’s unique climate of warm days, 

cool nights, mountain-fed irrigation, and rich volcanic soil 

is conducive to growing world-renowned potatoes; 

Whereas Idaho potatoes are top-selling and highly recognized 

potatoes in the United States due to their consistently 

great taste, versatility, and nutritional content; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 180 IS 

Whereas the Idaho potato ‘‘brand’’ is recognized throughout 

the world for its high quality and is an identifying characteristic of the great State of Idaho; 

Whereas May 2007 marks the 70th consecutive year that 

Idaho potatoes have been promoted by the Idaho Potato 

Commission, an Idaho potato industry group responsible 

for generating attention for the numerous attributes of 

Idaho potatoes; 

Whereas the Idaho Potato Commission is recognized nationally and internationally as a top promotional authority 

for Idaho’s potatoes and potato products; 

Whereas the Idaho Potato Commission’s requirement, since 

1959, that only potatoes grown in the State of Idaho are 

allowed to wear the ‘‘Grown in Idaho’’ Federal certification mark contributed toward the creation of a distinctive, enduringly successful, and popular brand for the 

Russet Burbank potato variety; and 

Whereas Idaho’s potato industry contributes approximately 

$2,700,000,000 to the State economy and employs 

39,000 residents: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the 70th anniversary of the 

3 Idaho Potato Commission; and 

4 (2) designates May 2007 as ‘‘Idaho Potato 

5 Month’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
§ 2700.44 Petition for assessment of penalty in discrimination cases. ( a ) *Petition for assessment of penalty in Secretary's complaint.* A discrimination complaint filed by the Secretary shall propose a civil penalty of a specific amount for the alleged violation of section 105(c) of the Act, 30 U.S.C. 815(c). The petition for assessment of penalty shall include a short and plain statement of supporting reasons based on the criteria for penalty assessment set forth in section 110(i) of the Act. 30 U.S.C. 820(i).
( b ) *Petition for assessment of penalty after sustaining of complaint by miner, representative of miners, or applicant for employment.* Immediately upon issuance of a decision by a Judge sustaining a discrimination complaint brought pursuant to section 105(c)(3), 30 U.S.C. 815(c)(3), the Judge shall notify the Secretary in writing of such determination. The Secretary shall file with the Commission a petition for assessment of civil penalty within 45 days of receipt of such notice.
June 25, 2015 

Mr. Richard Fisher 

Precision Midwest 

3S 140 Barkley Avenue 

Warrenville, IL 60555 

Dear Mr. Fisher: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your June 15, exemption request on behalf of Precision Midwest into the public 

docket (No. FAA-2015-2262), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 
2 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION**


**OF**


**PRINCIPAL
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND**


**PRINCIPAL
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C.1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








I,
      John
      Z. Ferguson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of a21, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31,
      2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of a21, Inc.





I,
      Thomas
      Costanza, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of a21, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31,
      2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of a21, Inc.





Pursuant
      to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
      certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.








By:
                /s/ JOHN Z. FERGUSON
              ----------------------------------
              John
                Z. Ferguson
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)
              
              
              By:
                /s/ THOMAS COSTANZA
              ----------------------------------
              Thomas
                Costanza
              Vice
                President and Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)
              
              Dated:  May
                14, 2007
796 A.2d 966

#### In re Nomination PETITION OF Dan ROONEY, Republican Candidate for Representative in the General Assembly from the 149th District. Appeal of Marilyn Vaccarello.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 9, 2002.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of May, 2002, the order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed. The Appellee’s “Motion to Strike the First Issue in the Appellant’s Brief’ is denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 89 (Monday, May 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26791-26792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11243]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7108]

Advisory Committee for the Study of Eastern Europe and the 
Independent States of the Former Soviet Union; Notice of Committee 
Renewal

    Renewal of Advisory Committee. The Department of State has renewed 
the Charter of the Advisory Committee for the Study of Eastern Europe 
and the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union. This advisory 
committee makes recommendations to the Secretary of State on funding 
for applications submitted for the Research and Training Program on 
Eastern Europe and the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union 
(Title VIII). These applications are submitted in response to an annual 
open competition among U.S. national organizations with interest and 
expertise administering research and training programs in the Russian, 
Eurasian, and Central and East European fields. The program seeks to 
build and sustain U.S. expertise on these regions through support for 
advanced graduate training, language training, and postdoctoral 
research.
    The committee includes representatives of the Secretaries of 
Defense and Education, the Librarian of

[[Page 26792]]

Congress, and the Presidents of the American Association for the 
Advancement of Slavic Studies and the Association of American 
Universities. The Assistant Secretary for Intelligence and Research 
chairs the advisory committee for the Secretary of State. The committee 
meets at least once annually to recommend grant policies and 
recipients.
    For further information, please call Jon Crocitto, U.S. Department 
of State, (202) 736-4661.

    Dated: May 2, 2011.
Susan H. Nelson,
Executive Director, Advisory Committee for Study of Eastern Europe and 
Eurasia (the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union).
[FR Doc. 2011-11243 Filed 5-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-32-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 12:58 p.m. on Thursday, August 4, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters related to the Corporation's supervision, corporate, and resolution activities. 

                    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director Thomas J. Curry (Appointive), seconded by Director John G. Walsh (Acting Comptroller of the Currency), and concurred in by Acting Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, that Corporation                           ( print page 48163)                        business required its consideration of the matters which were to be the subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10) of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10)).                 

The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located at 550—17th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 

Dated: August 4, 2011. 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 

Robert E. Feldman, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011-20183 Filed 8-4-11; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE P
#### § 552.4 Babysitting services.

As used in section 13(a)(15) of the Act, the term *babysitting services* shall mean the custodial care and protection, during any part of the 24-hour day, of infants or children in or about the private home in which the infants or young children reside. The term “babysitting services” does not include services relating to the care and protection of infants or children which are performed by trained personnel, such as registered, vocational, or practical nurses. While such trained personnel do not qualify as babysitters, this fact does not remove them from the category of a covered domestic service employee when employed in or about a private household.
#### § 4905.5 Requests for authenticated copies of PBGC records.

The PBGC will grant requests for authenticated copies of PBGC records, for purposes of admissibility under 28 U.S.C. 1733 and Rule 44 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for records that are to be disclosed pursuant to this part or part 4901 of this chapter. Appropriate fees will be charged for providing authenticated copies of PBGC records, in accordance with part 4901, subpart D, of this chapter.