32126 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 99 / Monday, May 22, 2000 / Notices

As required by 5 U.S.C. 552(r) and

Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) implementing regulations, the

Department of Justice has provided a

report on the proposed changes to OMB

and the Congress.

A modified system description is set

forth below.

Dated: May 8, 2000.

Stephen R. Colgate,

Assistant Attorney General for

Administration.

JUSTICE/OIG–001

SYSTEM NAME:

Office of the Inspector General

Investigative Records.

SYSTEM LOCATION:

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of

the Inspector General, 950 Pennsylvania

Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20530–0001

and 1425 New York Ave., NW, Suite

7100, Washington, DC 20530. During

the course of an investigation, records

are also kept in the investigations field

offices, the addresses of which are listed

on the OIG’s website at http://

www.usdoj.gov/org.

* * * * *

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE

SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND

THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:

* * * * *

(a) In the event that a record, either by

itself or in combination with other

information, indicates a violation or

potential violation of law, whether civil,

criminal, or regulatory in nature, and

whether arising by general stature or

particular program statute, or by rule,

regulation, or order pursuant thereto, or

a violation or potential violation of a

contract, the relevant record may be

disclosed to the appropriate agency,

whether Federal, state, local, foreign, or

international, charged with the

responsibility or investigating or

prosecuting such violation, enforcing or

implementing such statute, rule,

regulation, or order, or with enforcing

such contract.

* * * * *

(d) A record may be disclosed to a

Federal, State, local, foreign, or

international agency, or other public

authority or professional licensing

organization, in connection with the

assignment, hiring, or retention of an

individual, the issuance or revocation of

a security clearance, the reporting of an

investigation of an individual, the

letting of a contract, or the issuance or

revocation of a license, grant, or other

benefit by such an entity, to the extent

that the information is relevant and

necessary to that entity’s decision on the

matter. No disclosure will be made

under this paragraph unless the

Inspector General or his designee

determines that the information is

sufficiently reliable to support a referral

to another office within the Department

of Justice or to another Federal, state, or

local agency for criminal, civil,

administrative, personnel, or regulatory

action.

* * * * *

(h) Information permitted to be

released to the news media and the

public pursuant to 28 CFR 50.2 may be

made available, unless it is determined

that release of the specific information

in the context of a particular case would

constitute an unwarranted invasion of

personal privacy.

(i) Information may be disclosed to

complainants and victims to the extent

necessary to provide them with

information concerning the progress or

results of the investigation or case

arising from the matters of which they

complained or were the victim.

* * * * *

RETRIEVABILITY:

Each OIG investigation is assigned a

case number and all records relating to

a particular investigation are filed and

retrieved by that case number. In some

instances, records may also be

retrievable by the surnames of subjects,

witnesses, and/or complaintants.

* * * * *

RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:

Records in this system are retained

and disposed of in accordance with the

schedule approved by the Archivist of

the United States, Job Number NI–60–

97–4.

SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:

Office of the General Counsel, Office

of the Inspector General, Department of

Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Room 4261, Washington, DC 20530–

0001.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 00–12735 Filed 5–19–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–CJ–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

Investigations Regarding Certifications

of Eligibility To Apply for NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

Petitions for transitional adjustment

assistance under the North American

Free Trade Agreement-Transitional

Adjustment Assistance Implementation

Act (Public Law 103-182), hereinafter

called (NAFTA–TAA), have been filed

with State Governors under Section

250(b)(1) of Subchapter D, Chapter 2,

Title II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as

amended, are identified in the

Appendix to this Notice. Upon notice

from a Governor that a NAFTA–TAA

petition has been received, the Director

of the Division of Trade Adjustment

Assistance (DTAA), Employment and

Training Administration (ETA),

Department of Labor (DOL), announces

the filing of the petition and takes action

pursuant to paragraphs (c) and (e) of

Section 250 of the Trade Act.

The purpose of the Governor’s actions

and the Labor Department’s

investigations are to determine whether

the workers separated from employment

on or after December 8, 1993 (date of

enactment of Pub. L. 103–182) are

eligible to apply for NAFTA–TAA under

Subchapter D of the Trade Act because

of increased imports from or the shift in

production to Mexico or Canada.

The petitioners or any other persons

showing a substantial interest in the

subject matter of the investigations may

request a public hearing with the

Director of DTAA at the U.S.

Department of Labor (DOL) in

Washington, DC provided such request

if filed in writing with the Director of

DTAA not later than June 1, 2000.

Also, interested persons are invited to

submit written comments regarding the

subject matter of the petitions to the

Director of DTAA at the address shown

below not later than June 1, 2000.

Petitions filed with the Governors are

available for inspection at the Office of

the Director, DTAA, ETA, DOL, Room

C–4318, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20210.

Signed at Washington, DC this 16th day of

May 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade

Adjustment Assistance

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 99 / Monday, May 22, 2000 / Notices 32127

APPENDIX

Subject firm Location Date received at

Governor’s office Petition No. Articles produced

Dana Corporation (Wkrs) ......... Marion, OH ............................... 05/05/2000 NAFTA–3,879 Axles & ring gears.

Ranco North America (Co.) ..... Plain City, OH .......................... 05/01/2000 NAFTA–3,880 Plastic water valves, metal

water valves.

Johnson Controls (Co.) ............ Goshen, IL ................................ 05/01/2000 NAFTA–3,881 Machining equipment for parts.

Schmalbach Luheca Plastic

Containers (Co.).

Novi, MI .................................... 01/24/2000 NAFTA–3,882 Plastic bottles.

Maier’s Bakery (Wkrs) .............. Easton, PA ............................... 05/04/2000 NAFTA–3,883 Bread production.

Grayson Enterprises (Wkrs) ..... Eaton, IN .................................. 05/04/2000 NAFTA–3,884 Sterile sampling & custom

printed bags.

Lind Shoe (Wkrs) ..................... Somerset, WI ........................... 04/27/2000 NAFTA–3,885 Shoes.

Ingersoll Rand Transportation

(Wkrs).

Los Angeles, CA ...................... 05/22/2000 NAFTA–3,886 Door locks, door lock parts.

Vanity Fair Intimates (Co.) ....... Jackson, AL .............................. 05/08/2000 NAFTA–3,887 Women’s intimate apparel.

Lear Corporation (Wkrs) .......... El Paso, TX .............................. 05/03/2000 NAFTA–3,888 Dies for crimpong cables,

molds harness.

Pairgain Technologies (Wkrs) .. Tustin, CA ................................ 03/07/2000 NAFTA–3,889 Higain products.

Wheaton USA (Co.) ................. Pennsville, NJ .......................... 04/28/2000 NAFTA–3,890 Silk screening of glass cosmetic bottle.

Nortel Networks (Wkrs) ............ Santa Clara, CA ....................... 05/05/2000 NAFTA–3,891 Printed circuit.

Schreiber Foods (IBT) .............. Monroe, WI ............................... 05/01/2000 NAFTA–3,892 Cheese products.

Peninsula Ligh Metals (Wkrs) .. Hawthorne, CA ......................... 05/03/2000 NAFTA–3,893 Wheels, pedestals, valves.

Southland Manufacturing (Co.) Ashland, AL .............................. 05/08/2000 NAFTA–3,894 Men’s slacks.

Brunswick (Co.) ........................ Tulsa, OK ................................. 05/04/2000 NAFTA–3,895 Fishing tackle.

Ambar Chemical (Co.) ............. Manistee, MI ............................. 04/28/2000 NAFTA–3,896 Calcium chloride products.

Hillsville Apparel (Co.) .............. Hillsville, VA ............................. 05/09/2000 NAFTA–3,897 Men’s women’s & children’s

sportwear.

Volex (Co.) ............................... Clinton, AR ............................... 05/09/2000 NAFTA–3,898 Plastic finished power cord.

TI Group Automotive System

(Co.).

Valdosta, GA ............................ 05/02/2000 NAFTA–3,899 Auto parts.

Triboro Electric (Co.) ................ Doylestown, PA ........................ 05/09/2000 NAFTA–3,900 Fluorescent & incandescent

lighting.

Hamilton Beach—Proctor Silex

(Co.).

Mount Airy, NC ......................... 05/10/2000 NAFTA–3,901 Toasters.

Bertone KTG Mills (UNITE) ..... Brooklyn, NY ............................ 05/01/2000 NAFTA–3,902 Trimmings.

Dana (Co.) ................................ Kendallville, IN ......................... 05/10/2000 NAFTA–3,903 Fuel rails.

APV America (USWA) ............. Lake Mills, WI ........................... 05/09/2000 NAFTA–3,904 Valves.

Four Seasons Apparel (Co.) .... Murfreesboro, NC ..................... 05/12/2000 NAFTA–3,905 Sportwear.

RHI (Co.) .................................. Farber, MO ............................... 05/10/2000 NAFTA–3,906 Bricks for steel.

Go Dan Industrial (Wkrs) ......... Houston, TX ............................. 04/05/2000 NAFTA–3,907 Automotive industrial radiators.

Invensys Appliance Controls

(Co.).

Independence, VA .................... 05/09/2000 NAFTA–3,908 Cold controls for refrigeration.

Beloit Corporation (Co.) ........... Neeah, WI ................................ 05/10/2000 NAFTA–3,909 Paper making machinery.

[FR Doc. 00–12768 Filed 5–19–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

[TA–W–37, 382]

Alaska Petroleum Contractors Alpine

Project Kenai (Kenai, AK; Notice of

Negative Determination Regarding

Application for Reconsideration

By application dated April 24, 2000,

petitioners requested administrative

reconsideration of the Department’s

negative determination regarding

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment

Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers

and former workers of the subject firm.

The denial notice was signed on April

7, 2000, and published in the Federal

Register on April 21, 2000 (64 FR

21474).

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18 (c)

reconsideration may be granted under

the following circumstances:

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts

not previously considered that the

determination complained of was

erroneous;

(2) If it appears that the determination

complained of was based on a mistake

in the determination of facts not

previously considered; or

(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying

Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or

of the law justified reconsideration of

the decision.

The April 7, 2000, denial of TAA for

workers engaged in employment related

to the fabrication and assembly of large

oil production modules at Alaska

Petroleum Contractors, Alpine Project

Kenai, Kenai, Alaska, was based on the

finding that the ‘‘contributed

importantly’’ test of the worker group

eligibility requirements of section 222 of

the Trade Act of 1974 was not met. The

contributed importantly test is generally

determined by a survey of the major

declining customers of the subject firm.

The Department conducted a survey of

the sole customer of Alaska Petroleum

Contractors, Alpine Project Kenai,

Kenai, Alaska. The customer did not

import oil production modules during

the time period relevant to the

investigation.

The petitioners assert that many U.S.

companies bid on the construction of

offshore drilling platforms which was

awarded to a Korean producer. They

add that Alaska Petroleum Contractors

would have been able to build this

project or continue with planned work

and deliver on site, except for cheaper

foreign labor and material offered by the

Koreans and the drop in crude oil prices