# BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

____________________________________ )

In the matter of the application of )

)

WINGS AIRWAYS ) DOCKET DOT-OST-2010-0023

)

For a certificate of public convenience )

And necessity under 49 USC 41102 )

____________________________________)

ANSWER IN OPPOSITION OF

AIR EXCURSIONS, LLC

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to:

Mike Loverink

Air Excursions, LLC

Suite 115

1873 Shell Simmons Drive

Juneau, AK 99801

(907) 789-5591

mloverink@yahoo.com

February 16, 2010

# 1 BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

____________________________________ )

In the matter of the application of )

)

WINGS AIRWAYS ) DOCKET DOT-OST-2010-0023

)

For a certificate of public convenience )

And necessity under 49 USC 41102 )

____________________________________)

ANSWER IN OPPOSITION OF

AIR EXCURSIONS, LLC

On January 25, 2010, Wings Airways applied fo r a certificate of pub lic convenience and

necessity. Throughout the filing, Wings Airways (Airways) stressed that the Application

was primarily a defensive gesture. The Applicant appears worried that certain

shareholders of Wings Airways might lose th eir employment. Two shareholders already

have, having voluntarily resigne d as key managers at Alaska Juneau Aeronautics, Inc.

d/b/a Wings of Alaska (AJA). AJA had pr eviously been a commonly owned certificated

air carrier operating wheel plane service Wings Airways operates seasonal tourism

flights using seaplanes, and the third commonly owned affiliate owns the aircraft. In

2008 the owners voluntarily sold AJA to a group of Oregon entrepreneurs who desired to

offer a new scheduled service between S eattle and Portland. This new operation,

SeaPort, was later expanded to include Essential Air Service in several lower-48 markets.

In Alaska, AJA increased its service by providi ng Essential Air Service with subsidy in

# 2 two new markets, Kake and Excursion Inlet. According to company statements given to

the media, AJA is profitable has no intent of changing service in any of its markets.

Perhaps more to the point for the Wings Airways shareholders who also own Wings

Airlines Services, the leases of five wheel ed aircraft by Wings Airlines Services to

AJA/Seaport were due to expire on Marc h 31. Not having received assurances of

continued profitable leases on those aircraft, Wings Airlin e Services decided on a new

gambit. Appendix L to the Application show s that Wings Airways founder, director and

significant shareholder Robert Jacobsen offered two Cessna Caravans and three Cessna

207’s for lease unless AJA could come to agreeab le terms. That le tter, dated January 22,

2010, resulted in the filing of the current Applic ation just three days later. As will be

shown later, the Application is really not hing more than a negotiating gambit. The

execution date of the three in cluded affidavits (January 6, 2010) shows that Wings

Airways and Wings Airline Serv ices had prepared the Application in advance against the

event of a negotiating impasse with AJA.

To test the possibility that the Application is a red he rring, Air Excursions moved to

reopen carrier selection in the Kake and Excu rsion Inlet EAS case. Citing Airways claim

that it would have possession and control of th e five aircraft currently used by AJA, we

requested the Department consider Air Excu rsions for operation of the routes with

appropriate subsidy. It must be noted that Department regulations require a 90-day notice

before cessation or even substantial reducti on of service in any market. AJA has not

provided the required notice in any Alaskan market, and co ntinued service requires the

# 3 exclusive use of the five airc raft proposed for service by Airways. Appendix A is the

response by AJA. In that response AJA not only reiterates its intent to continue service

to Kake and Excursion, but to all southeas tern Alaska markets. To provide these

services, AJA asserts that it will have contin uing use of the two Caravan and three Cessna

207 aircraft also claimed by Airways. Ther e are now two filings on the record claiming

exclusive use of the same five aircraft.

Airways also claims to lease a 24,000 square foot hangar and cargo facility (cite). Its

Application states that ownership of the ha ngar is in dispute and part of a bankruptcy

filing in Oregon. In fact, none of the Juneau parties (Airways, Wings Airline Services

and their respective common owners) have any ownership claim or control of the Juneau

hangar. Mr. Jacobsen, the previous owner of the hangar, has traded his financial interest

in the Juneau hangar for equity in another building in Portland, OR. Appendix B clearly

shows that the Juneau hangar at 8421 Li vingston Way is solely owned by Fountain

Village Development. Under bankruptcy law, Airways continuation as a tenant depends

entirely on the good will of AJA. Fountain Village Development is not affiliated with

AJA, but is owned by a primary i nvestor in AJA, John Beardsley.

With regard to the only physical assets proposed for use by Airways we now have three

certified statements (AJA, Airways and F ountain Village Development) that are in

conflict. Air Excursions does not claim a ny complete knowledge of the situation, but

given the devolving relationships among the part ies the Department must determine with

# 4 certainty who owns and controls the various a ssets that are essentia l to Airways proposed

operation.

THE APPLICATION IS DEFICIENT AND INCOMPLETE

The requirements of 14 CFR 204 require certai n specific data be provided, and Airways

missed at least two vital requirements. 14 CFR 204.3(n)(2) requires provision of the

terms of any leases. Other than stating th at it will finance the aircraft and hangar with

internal funds, Airways provides no details abou t the disputed assets. In order to show

that it is capable of providing the service it promises. Airways must be required to

provide executed leases for all five ai rcraft and the hangar in its application.

Given that Airways does not currently opera te wheel planes, has no ticket counters,

airport ramp space or employees at any of the ai rports it proposes to serve, there should

be some specification of its pre-operating activit ies and expenses. Contrary to the

requirements of 14 CFR 204.3(t)(2), Airway s does not provide an itemization of

anticipated pre-operating expense, nor does it provide a statement of the basis of

projected costs. As shown below, Airways provides very few assumptions and no

specific sourcing, and those thatare provided are unrealistic.

The Application is deficient in that it fails to provide ba sic information on the proposed

operation which can be used to validate and verify operating assumptions. For example,

there is no proposed flight schedule in any of the markets. While the total block time

# 5 proposed is somewhat less than that of AJA, the yields and total lo ad factors are much

higher.

Airways significantly overestimates the revenue to be derived from the traffic it predicts

it will carry. For example, Airways assumes passenger yields that are higher or just

lower than the pre-tax full ad ult non-reservation fares in the markets and much higher

than the actual yields experienced by Ai r Excursions in the same markets.

Market Airways Fare Pre-Tax Full Fare Air X Net

Juneau-Hoonah $ 64.00 $ 69.77 $ 60.00

Juneau-Haines $ 101.00 $ 97.67 $ 84.00

Juneau-Skagway $ 110.00 $ 111.63 $ 96.00

Based on the passenger projecti ons, Airways overestimates it s passenger revenue in the

Hoonah market by $41,400 (10,350 passengers @ $4.00), the Haines market by $157,250

(9,250 passengers @ $17.00) and the Skag way market by $152,6000 (10,900 passengers

@ $14.00). Even assuming the projected passenger numbers, Airways has overestimated

its passenger revenue by $ 351,250.

Airways proposes freight ra tes that are higher than the existing $0.40/lb. one-pound rate

in all of the markets. Based on th e 671,000 freight pounds projected, Airways

overestimates its freight reve nue by $105,250 (671,000 @ $0.40/lb vs. $373,650

projected). Even if we assume the volume le vels of passenger and freight traffic in these

competitive markets, Airways has overestim ated the revenue that will be earned by

$456,500.

# 6 The traffic levels are equally subject to questi on. Airways uses AJA historic traffic from

calendar year 2008, but assumes that it will carry virtually all of the passengers and

freight in all three markets. Appendix C shows that Airways projects it will carry

between 97.24% and 100% of total scheduled service mark et passengers, and between

97.11% and 99.46% of total scheduled service market passengers. Strangely, Airways

only assumes between 49.38% and 82.97% of ma il traffic. This might indicate that

Airways assumes competition in the three markets, but in any case if Airways had

assumed virtually all of the mail traffic in the markets its on-board load factors would

exceed 100% in the peak season. In 2008 AJA/Wings of Alaska provided the only

scheduled services in these markets, and tr ansported 100% of the traffic. Today both

AJA and Air Excursions provide scheduled se rvice and split the traffic. Unless AJA

discontinues its service, Airways would become the third scheduled carrier in the market.

Airways further tunes its pr ojections by assuming less cap acity than AJA provided in

2008 and resultingly higher total load factors. Appendix D shows the 2008 experienced

segment load factors (source: AJA T-100 segm ent reports) and the pr ojected load factors

Airways assumes. While the passenger load factors hover ne ar experienced levels, the

projected total load factors are consistently much higher than experience, and up to 215%

of the actual loads for AJA (3 rd 

# calendar quarter, Juneau-Skagway market). In any case it

is adsurd to assume that Airways will car ry nearly 100% of the passenger and freight

traffic in the markets as the second carrier if not the third carrier competing. Combining

the overstated load factors with the overstated passenger and freight yields shows that the

# 7 profits projected by Airways are entirely illusory. The Department must require

clarification and sourcing for all of the projections made by Airways.

WHO HAS THE AIRCRAFT?

On page 7 of its Application, Airways makes th e situation very clear. It says, “In the

event Wings of Alaska does not have the n ecessary aircraft to provide the required

service, or if Wings of Alaska enough qualified employ ees to perform the required

operations, Wings Airways would be able to pr ovide the service with sufficient aircraft

and employees. Obviously the c onverse is true. If AJA/Wings of Alaska has use of the

five aircraft proposed for service by Airw ays, Airways will not have the necessary

aircraft and employees to perform the servi ce if proposes. All of the spreadsheet magic

of its financial forecasts will be for naught if it does not have the necessary aircraft.

Without the five aircraft, Airways cannot be found able to perform the service. The

singular question on which certification of Airways hinges is who has the aircraft?

SUMMARY

Weeks before Wings Airline Services reach ed an apparent impasse with AJA on the

continued lease of two Caravans and three C-207’s, Airways was persuaded to develop

an alternative use for the aircraft. Within days of offering the aircraft to Airways the

Application was filed. Within short order an extended lease for the aircraft with AJA was

executed as evidenced by Appendix A. The De partment’s certifica tion process was used

# 8 as a negotiating ploy by Wings Airline Serv ices and its common owners of Wings

Airways. While Airways admitted that the se rvice was subject to the availability of

aircraft, the application was r eally a ruse. Airways also ove rlooks entirely the fact that

Air Excursions is now providing scheduled serv ice and has as many aircraft available to

service on these routes as does AJA toda y. Even if AJA ceases to operate, Air

Excursions have sufficient capacity. There is no service emergency or need for prompt

action. The Airways application should be based on its merits, or which there are not

enough for the necessary finding.

WHEREFORE , Air Excursions, LLC asks that the Application of Wings Airways be

dismissed for lack of foundation and fitness.

Respectfully submitted,

Air Excursions, LLC

_________________________ By Mike Loverink, owner

February 16, 2010

# 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this day caused a copy of the Answer in Opposition of Air

Excursions, LLC to be mailed to all persons li sted on the certificate of service appended

to the Application of Wings Airways filed January 25, 2010.

____________________ Mike Loverink

February 16, 2010

# 10 Appendix A

Page 1 of 2



# ALASKA JUNEAU AERONAUTICS

Answer to Motion to reopen Select ion of Carriers for Dockets 2002-

12014 and 2008-0217

Alaska Juneau Aeronautics, Inc. (“AJA”) obj ects to Air Excursions, L.L.C.’s (“AE”)

Motion to Reopen the Selection of Carrier s dated February 2, 2010 for the following

reasons.

AE’s allegation that AJA does have the necess ary Caravan’s to fulfill its contractual

obligations to the Department to provide air se rvice to Kake and Excurs ion Inlet AK is false.

AJA currently leases 2 Caravans and 3 Ce ssna 207s and will continue to have the needed

aircraft to meet its contractual obligations to the DOT.

AE’s allegation that AJA has over -charged the Department by subs tituting aircraft is false.

AJA bills the Department $307.54 for departures in a C208 and $170.86 for departures in a

C207. This represents a 45% savings to the department which is more than the cost

difference Mr. Myers claims of 40%. The redu ction in subsidy is by departure, so it

automatically accounts for the difference in indirect expense. AJA could have run the more

expensive aircraft on the route and needlessly billed the department for empty seats.

However, this seems fiscally irresponsible.

AE’s allegations that AJA has not flown all r equired flights to Kake and Excursion Inlet is

false. AJA has completed every flight to these communities that were safe to do so. AJA has

done so in the most efficient aircraft possible. In no case did we turn passenger traffic away

to fly a smaller aircraft.

Contrary to AE’s allegations, AJA has actua lly gone beyond its contractual obligations as

follows:

1. Even though only contractually obligated to provide two round trips per day, AJA

provided three round trips last summer at our own risk. Additionally, the statistics

provided end last November 2009. In December 2009 AJA flew every trip to Kake in a

C208.

2. In about two months AJA will have its enti re inventory distributed on all on-line travel

agencies (Expedia, Travelocity, etc.) This level visibility in the global distribution system

is unprecedented for these rural communities. AJA has taken this step at its own

expense and outside of the costs co ntemplated in its original bid.



# 8421 Livingston Way • Junea u, AK 99801 • 907-789-0790

# 11 Appendix A

Page 2 of 2



# ALASKA JUNEAU AERONAUTICS

We submit that AJA has faithfully, and d iligently upheld its obligations to the

Department and the communities, that Air Excursion's false accusations should be

disregarded, and that their Motion should be denied.

Sincerely,

Rob McKinney

President

Alaska Juneau Aeronautics, Inc.



# 8421 Livingston Way • Junea u, AK 99801 • 907-789-0790

# 12 Appendix B

Page 1 of 1



# In re Fountain Village Development , a general partnership

Attachment to Voluntary Petition

Location of Principal Assets of Debtor

Property Address City, State, Zip County

Fountain Village Block

2nd and Ankeny 15-27 SW 2nd Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah

2nd and Burnside 9-13 SW 2nd Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah

3rd and Ankeny 16 SW 3rd Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah

New Market Theater Block

Fountain Village Bldg 75-83 SW 1st Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah

New Market Theater Bldg 120 SW Ankeny St Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah

Patrick and Poppleton Buildings

Patrick and Poppleton 816-818 SW 1st Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah

Patrick and Poppleton 824-828 SW 1st Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah

Loyalty and Hamilton Buildings

Loyalty Building 317 SW Alder St Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah

Hamilton Building 523-529 SW 3rd Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah

11 NW 5th 11 NW 5th Ave Portland, OR 97209 Multnomah

5 NW 5th 5 NW 5th Ave Portland, OR 97209 Multnomah

522 NW Thompson 522 N Thompson St Portland, OR 97227 Multnomah

61st Street 13642 SW 61st Ave Portland, OR 97219-8133 Clackamas

Blagen 30-34 NW 1st Ave Portland, OR 97209 Multnomah

Gearhart 1768 Ocean Dr Gearhart, OR 97138 Clatsop

Jazz de Opus 27-33 NW 2nd Ave Portland, OR 97209 Multnomah

Oregon Pioneer Building 409 SW 3rd Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah

Postal Building 502-516 SW 3rd Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah

Yeon Land / Building 520-530 SW 5th Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah

Juneau, Alaska Hangar 8421 Livingston Way Juneau, AK 99801 Juneau

Source; Bankruptcy filing of Fountain Villa ge Development, Portland, OR

# 13YR MO ORI ORI CITY DEST DEST CITYCARR CLASS PAX FRT MAIL Appendix C2008 4 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 380 1185 1015Page 1 of 32008 4 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 359 17307 109432008 5 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 535 1920 20622008 5 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 524 15334 92832008 6 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 531 4717 30412008 6 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 543 14128 8563APR-JUN TOTALS 2872 54591 34907AIRWAYS PROJECTION2,850 54,000 28,000AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE99.23% 98.92% 80.21%2008 7 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 633 6282 39502008 7 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 625 15711 116182008 8 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 719 3845 62002008 8 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 705 16918 157892008 9 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 629 2942 50652008 9 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 533 15255 13892JUL-SEP TOTALS 3844 60953 56514AIRWAYS PROJECTION3,800 60,000 29,000AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE98.86% 98.44% 51.31%2008 10 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 585 2237 37972008 10 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 503 13884 147102008 11 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 357 1875 28412008 11 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 322 8856 155742008 12 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 291 1208 49202008 12 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 278 11744 14200OCT-DEC TOTALS 2336 39804 56042AIRWAYS PROJECTION2,300 39,000 28,000AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE98.46% 97.98% 49.96%2008 1 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 196 919 26422008 1 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 184 9623 75742008 2 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 196 1911 13132008 2 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 201 8856 72902008 3 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 328 1314 9812008 3 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 301 8192 8077JAN-MAR TOTALS 1406 30815 27877AIRWAYS PROJECTION1,400 30,000 23,000AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE99.57% 97.36% 82.51%1YR MO ORI ORI CITY DEST DEST CITYCARR CLASS PAX FRT MAIL Appendix C2008 4 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 369 2743 2262Page 2 of 32008 4 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 413 16075 196062008 5 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 454 2075 18322008 5 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 502 13645 235212008 6 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 506 2780 36722008 6 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 611 16973 21717APR-JUN TOTALS 2855 54291 72610AIRWAYS PROJECTION2,850 54,000 54,000AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE99.82% 99.46% 74.37%2008 7 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 584 4561 57602008 7 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 756 21816 280402008 8 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 687 5567 89352008 8 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 748 17618 358462008 9 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 475 5401 86042008 9 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 480 20679 31853JUL-SEP TOTALS 3730 75642 119038AIRWAYS PROJECTION3,700 75,000 63,000AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE99.20% 99.15% 52.92%2008 10 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 487 4671 73312008 10 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 476 18701 334712008 11 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 226 2313 64882008 11 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 224 10622 258302008 12 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 159 2662 125742008 12 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 199 11372 25697OCT-DEC TOTALS 1771 50341 111391AIRWAYS PROJECTION1,750 50,000 55,000AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE98.81% 99.32% 49.38%2008 1 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 109 1372 32992008 1 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 150 9437 181372008 2 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 112 997 32332008 2 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 148 8821 147382008 3 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 211 1210 28602008 3 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 247 12647 19199JAN-MAR TOTALS 977 34484 61466AIRWAYS PROJECTION950 34,000 51,000AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE97.24% 98.60% 82.97%2YR MO ORI ORI CITY DEST DEST CITYCARR CLASS PAX FRT MAIL Appendix C2008 4 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 494 24677 22578Page 3 of 32008 4 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 323 3123 52532008 5 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 738 34691 322982008 5 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 591 3407 135242008 6 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 916 34145 307422008 6 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 855 4604 18247APR-JUN TOTALS 3917 104647 122642AIRWAYS PROJECTION3,900 104,000 67,000AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE99.57% 99.38% 54.63%2008 7 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 991 35498 338812008 7 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 1005 5668 217592008 8 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 1068 31702 384792008 8 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 1133 5285 251602008 9 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 488 18425 224622008 9 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 582 6372 28241JUL-SEP TOTALS 5267 102950 169982AIRWAYS PROJECTION5,250 102,000 84,000AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE99.68% 99.08% 49.42%2008 10 JNU JUNEAU SGYSKAGWAY K5 F 232 14402 183652008 10 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 237 2636 89802008 11 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 155 8651 153742008 11 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 144 1130 49572008 12 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 111 9754 138692008 12 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 121 1191 6965OCT-DEC TOTALS1000 37764 68510AIRWAYS PROJECTION1,000 37,000 34,000AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE100.00% 97.98% 49.63%2008 1 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 80 7908 92742008 1 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 58 1387 45382008 2 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 99 8372 72792008 2 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 116 1163 35162008 3 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 241 12910 119502008 3 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 202 1213 5603JAN-MAR TOTALS 796 32953 42160AIRWAYS PROJECTION750 32,000 31,000AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE94.22% 97.11% 73.53%AppendixDPage 1 of6Y M ORI ORI CITY DESTDESTCITY CAR CLS A/C PAYLOAD SEATS PAX FRT MAILPAXLF TTL LF2009 4 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 192,340 590 311 1810 27332009 4 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 918 4 0 0 02009 4 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 66,000 198 90 348 5782009 4 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 185,820 570 267 11197 102452009 4 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 918 4 3 8 02009 4 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 66,000 198 114 1984 34942009 5 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 311,330 955 501 3758 53952009 5 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 105,000 315 126 1567 21422009 5 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 301,550 925 483 12409 148882009 5 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 102,000 306 187 3031 13122009 6 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 295,030 905 540 4734 37262009 6 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 117,000 351 153 1503 22182009 6 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 293,400 900 492 14263 107722009 6 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 111,000 333 172 2985 2393TOTAL 2,148,306 6554 3439 59597 59896 52.47% 37.58%AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS 49.00% 52.00%2009 7 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 285,250 875 539 5853 35802009 7 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 156,000 468 269 2797 21372009 7 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 G 0 35 1,630 5 0 0 02009 7 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 281,990 865 511 14939 107902009 7 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 150,000 450 326 6568 41802009 8 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 317,850 975 617 4197 47282009 8 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 156,000 468 306 3527 20792009 8 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 299,920 920 516 10802 94082009 8 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 153,000 459 238 4944 53382009 9 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 198,860 610 382 2422 36572009 9 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 171,000 513 312 1843 30342009 9 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 190,710 585 326 7497 81342009 9 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 168,000 504 249 5687 4363TOTAL 2,530,210 7697 4591 71076 61428 59.65% 41.53%AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS 60.00% 67.00%AppendixDPage 2 of6Y M ORI ORI CITY DESTDESTCITY CAR CLS A/C PAYLOAD SEATS PAX FRT MAILPAXLF TTL LF2009 10 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 161,370 495 290 1625 13682009 10 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 177,000 531 316 1208 20172009 10 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 180,000 540 318 7364 67572009 10 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 163,000 500 273 6956 67682009 11 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 123,880 380 206 1072 14622009 11 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 90,000 270 152 3992 8252009 11 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 90,000 270 139 4043 37312009 11 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 135,290 415 197 7968 86292008 12 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 107,580 330 167 679 19772008 12 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 918 4 0 0 02008 12 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 99,000 297 123 500 31122008 12 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 99,430 305 137 5723 72392008 12 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 99,000 297 139 5998 67922008 12 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 918 4 1 46 633TOTAL 1,527,386 4638 2458 47174 51310 53.00% 38.63%AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS 46.00% 52.00%2009 1 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 65,200 200 83 809 8942009 1 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 17,442 76 34 138 6102009 1 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 36,000 108 44 172 5742009 1 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 63,570 195 92 4333 29422009 1 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 39,000 117 52 3738 47062009 1 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 20,196 88 34 2408 22372009 2 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 107,580 330 151 782 8782009 2 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 102,000 306 185 739 11722009 2 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 918 4 2 1 02009 2 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 109,210 335 179 4772 41072009 2 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 99,000 297 167 4371 58622009 3 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 123,880 380 193 1609 13322009 3 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 90,000 270 151 416 7112009 3 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 123,880 380 163 6423 57482009 3 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 87,000 261 101 3841 3967TOTAL 1,084,876 3347 1631 34552 35740 48.73% 36.55%AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS28.00% 33.00%AppendixDPage 3 of6Y M ORI ORI CITY DESTDESTCITY CAR CLS A/C PAYLOAD SEATS PAX FRT MAILPAXLF TTL LF2009 4 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 57,050 175 98 794 8562009 4 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 237,000 711 377 3307 46072009 4 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 68,460 210 143 4120 48482009 4 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 225,000 675 442 17921 257332009 5 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 125,510 385 203 1493 10572009 5 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 333,000 999 528 3179 52992009 5 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 125,510 385 220 4979 68892009 5 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 336,000 1008 585 13548 222072009 6 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 156,480 480 254 2720 28062009 6 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 273,000 819 430 2120 49852009 6 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 151,590 465 297 11251 66342009 6 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 261,000 783 427 12233 24439TOTAL 2,349,600 7095 4004 77665 110360 56.43% 42.08%AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS45.00% 54.00%2009 7 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 166,260 510 279 2739 19912009 7 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 240,000 720 397 3724 42782009 7 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 169,520 520 315 11287 72702009 7 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 306,000 918 583 15217 302742009 8 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 110,840 340 185 2483 27012009 8 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 318,000 954 540 4679 76752009 8 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 104,320 320 143 8655 55642009 8 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 294,000 882 515 15293 239142009 9 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 83,130 255 135 821 27102009 9 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 288,000 864 511 5098 102062009 9 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 86,390 265 128 4928 17542009 9 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 288,000 864 500 13399 33872TOTAL 2,454,460 7412 4231 88323 132209 57.08% 43.46%AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS59.00% 70.00%AppendixDPage 4 of6Y M ORI ORI CITY DESTDESTCITY CAR CLS A/C PAYLOAD SEATS PAX FRT MAILPAXLF TTL LF2009 10 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 61,940 190 118 717 9552009 10 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 285,000 855 635 5914 86072009 10 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 48,900 150 88 2353 22272009 10 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 285,000 855 562 21332 346212009 11 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 55,420 170 71 959 7882009 11 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 129,000 387 176 2457 58392009 11 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 57,050 175 108 3993 28732009 11 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 138,000 414 208 18031 249442008 12 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 52,160 160 48 694 29402008 12 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 126,000 378 135 2227 96892008 12 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 22,820 70 20 2400 32072008 12 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 132,000 396 189 11290 24893TOTAL 1,393,290 4200 2358 72367 121583 56.14% 47.77%AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS35.00% 45.00%2009 1 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 30,970 95 28 259 10502009 1 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 81,000 243 102 1351 48702009 1 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 1,836 8 3 70 1242009 1 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 24,450 75 26 1036 21832009 1 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 1,836 8 4 645 02009 1 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 85,346 252 105 6654 170772009 2 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 47,270 145 57 438 11262009 2 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 132,000 396 203 1995 66422009 2 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 32,600 100 45 2884 49672009 2 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 129,000 387 187 13096 189242009 3 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 48,900 150 62 230 21942009 3 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 153,000 459 217 1656 45442009 3 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 35,860 110 53 2873 32952009 3 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 153,000 459 256 11834 18572TOTAL 957,068 2887 1348 45021 85568 46.69% 41.81%AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS25.00% 36.00%AppendixDPage 5 of6Y M ORI ORI CITY DESTDESTCITY CAR CLS A/C PAYLOAD SEATS PAX FRT MAILPAXLF TTL LF2009 4 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 52,160 160 101 2901 44272009 4 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 189,000 567 339 11646 297472009 4 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 58,680 180 69 228 9942009 4 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 156,000 468 236 1958 30442009 5 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 70,090 215 95 3881 33812009 5 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 393,000 1179 727 30852 414612009 5 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 60,310 185 92 929 3422009 5 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 378,000 1134 615 2109 70222009 6 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 88,020 270 156 4983 24102009 6 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 408,000 1224 708 28906 470682009 6 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 83,130 255 117 984 17812009 6 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 369,000 1107 644 4886 14504TOTAL 2,305,390 6944 3899 94263 156181 56.15% 44.69%AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS62.00% 75.00%2009 7 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 128,770 395 234 3792 19102009 7 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 381,000 1143 781 23422 346182009 7 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 128,770 395 221 410 28422009 7 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 414,000 1242 852 4276 149702009 8 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 61,940 190 71 3002 41512009 8 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 423,000 1269 719 23282 375642009 8 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 58,680 180 117 654 13572009 8 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 366,000 1098 753 5116 183842009 9 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 68,460 210 84 5063 33642009 9 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 279,000 837 396 14903 112452009 9 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 70,090 215 103 642 41182009 9 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 249,000 747 464 5104 14707TOTAL 2,628,710 7921 4795 89666 14923060.54% 45.57%AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS83.00% 98.00%AppendixDPage 6 of6Y M ORI ORI CITY DESTDESTCITY CAR CLS A/C PAYLOAD SEATS PAX FRT MAILPAXLF TTL LF2009 10 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 47,270 145 64 3223 30002009 10 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 102,000 306 144 4503 100622009 10 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAUK5 F 0 35 32,600 100 53 328 16862009 10 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 108,000 324 177 890 27512009 11 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 27,710 85 53 2212 49042009 11 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 36,000 108 29 3274 75342009 11 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAUK5 F 0 35 22,820 70 37 356 11772009 11 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAUK5 F 4 16 45,000 135 29 791 11692008 12 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 30,970 95 57 3521 23242008 12 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 51,000 153 44 3915 91422008 12 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 8,150 25 9 41 10892008 12 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAUK5 F 4 16 69,000 207 88 891 5821TOTAL 580,520 1753 784 23945 50659 44.72% 39.86%AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS33.00% 41.00%2009 1 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 17,970 55 26 388 5722009 1 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 27,000 81 12 3095 39252009 1 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 9,780 30 6 72 10452009 1 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 30,000 90 22 293 11972009 2 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 26,080 80 56 597 1362009 2 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 27,000 81 20 1575 66162009 2 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 6,520 20 12 46 3632009 2 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 18,000 54 17 53 2122009 3 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 27,710 85 47 1985 9352009 3 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 57,000 171 99 2889 143142009 3 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 19,560 60 26 137 9312009 3 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 60,000 180 68 847 1772TOTAL 326,620 987 411 11977 32018 41.64% 38.64%AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS20.00% 28.00%