# AGENCY:

 Defense Logistics Agency, DoD. 

# ACTION:

 Proposed rule. 

# SUMMARY:

 The Defense Logistics Agency proposes to exempt a system of records (S500.30 CAAS, Incident Investigation/Police Inquiry Files) from certain provisions of the Privacy Act. The exemptions are intended to increase the value of the system of records for law enforcement purposes, to comply with prohibitions against the disclosure of certain kinds of information, and to protect the privacy of individuals identified in the system of records. 

# DATES:

 Comments must be received on or before March 20, 2000, to be considered by this agency. 

# ADDRESSES:

 Send comments to the Privacy Act Officer, Defense Logistics Agency, ATTN: CAAR, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 2533, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6221. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Ms. Susan Salus at (703) 767-6183. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

**Executive Order 12866, ‘Regulatory Planning and Review’**

It has been determined that 32 CFR part 323 is not a significant regulatory action. The rule does not: 

(1) Have an annual effect to the economy of $100 million or more; or adversely affect in a material way the economy; a section of the economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or state, local, or tribal governments or communities; 

(2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another Agency; 

(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; 

(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order. 

**Public Law 96-354, ‘Regulatory Flexibility Act’ (5 U.S.C. 601)**

It has been certified that this rule is not subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it would not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 

**Public Law 96-511, ‘Paperwork Reduction Act’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)**

It has been certified that this part does not impose any reporting or record keeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

## List of subjects in 32 CFR part 323

Privacy. 

Accordingly, 32 CFR part 323 is proposed to be amended as follows: 

# PART 323—DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM 

1. The authority citation for 32 CFR Part 323 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: Pub. L. 93-579, 88 Stat 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a). 

2. Appendix H to Part 323 is proposed to be amended by adding paragraph f. as follows: 

Start Printed Page 3168                    thnsp;Appendix H to Part 323-DLA Exemption Rules.                 

* * * * *

                    f.                     *ID: S500.30 CAAS (Specific exemption).*

                    1.                     *System name:*                     Incident Investigation/Police Inquiry Files.                 

                    2.                     *Exemption:*                     (i) Investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes may be exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2). However, if an individual is denied any right, privilege, or benefit for which he would otherwise be entitled by Federal law or for which he would otherwise be eligible, as a result of the maintenance of the information, the individual will be provided access to the information except to the extent that disclosure would reveal the identity of a confidential source.                 

(ii) Investigatory material compiled solely for the purpose of determining suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for federal civilian employment, military service, federal contracts, or access to classified information may be exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), but only to the extent that such material would reveal the identity of a confidential source. 

                    3.                     *Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) and (k)(5), subsections (c)(3), (d)(1) through (d)(4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I), and (f).                 

                    4.                     *Reasons:*                     (i) From subsection (c)(3) because to grant access to the accounting for each disclosure as required by the Privacy Act, including the date, nature, and purpose of each disclosure and the identity of the recipient, could alert the subject to the existence of the investigation or prosecutive interest by DLA or other agencies. This could seriously compromise case preparation by prematurely revealing its existence and nature; compromise or interfere with witnesses or make witnesses reluctant to cooperate; and lead to suppression, alteration, or destruction of evidence.                 

(ii) From subsections (d)(1) through (d)(4), and (f) because providing access to records of a civil or administrative investigation and the right to contest the contents of those records and force changes to be made to the information contained therein would seriously interfere with and thwart the orderly and unbiased conduct of the investigation and impede case preparation. Providing access rights normally afforded under the Privacy Act would provide the subject with valuable information that would allow interference with or compromise of witnesses or render witnesses reluctant to cooperate; lead to suppression, alteration, or destruction of evidence; enable individuals to conceal their wrongdoing or mislead the course of the investigation; and result in the secreting of or other disposition of assets that would make them difficult or impossible to reach in order to satisfy any Government claim growing out of the investigation or proceeding. 

(iii) From subsection (e)(1) because it is not always possible to detect the relevance or necessity of each piece of information in the early stages of an investigation. In some cases, it is only after the information is evaluated in light of other evidence that its relevance and necessity will be clear. 

(iv) From subsections (e)(4)(G) and (H) because this system of records is compiled for law enforcement purposes and is exempt from the access provisions of subsections (d) and (f). 

(v) From subsection (e)(4)(I) because to the extent that this provision is construed to require more detailed disclosure than the broad, generic information currently published in the system notice, an exemption from this provision is necessary to protect the confidentiality of sources of information and to protect privacy and physical safety of witnesses and informants. DLA will, nevertheless, continue to publish such a notice in broad generic terms as is its current practice. 

Dated: January 13, 2000. 

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense 

[FR Doc. 00-1315 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-10-F