alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 503.7 Investigation authority of Secretary. ( a ) *Authority of the Administrator, WHD.* The Secretary of Homeland Security has delegated to the Secretary, under 8 U.S.C. 1184(c)(14)(B), INA section 214(c)(14)(B), authority to perform investigative and enforcement functions. Within the Department of Labor, the Administrator, WHD will perform all such functions.
( b ) *Conduct of investigations.* The Secretary, through the WHD, may investigate to determine compliance with obligations under 8 U.S.C. 1184(c), INA section 214(c), 20 CFR part 655, subpart A, or the regulations in this part, either under a complaint or otherwise, as may be appropriate. In connection with such an investigation, WHD may enter and inspect any premises, land, property, worksite, vehicles, structure, facility, place and records (and make transcriptions, photographs, scans, videos, photocopies, or use any other means to record the content of the records or preserve images of places or objects), question any person, or gather any information, in whatever form, as may be appropriate.
( c ) *Confidential investigation.* The WHD will conduct investigations in a manner that protects the confidentiality of any complainant or other person who provides information to the Secretary in good faith.
( d ) *Report of violations.* Any person may report a violation of the obligations imposed by 8 U.S.C. 1184(c), INA section 214(c), 20 CFR part 655, subpart A, or the regulations in this part to the Secretary by advising any local office of the SWA, ETA, WHD or any other authorized representative of the Secretary. The office or person receiving such a report will refer it to the appropriate office of WHD for the geographic area in which the reported violation is alleged to have occurred.
ex10-91.htm


 

Exhibit 10.91

 

SECURED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE

 

AMENDMENT II

  

 

This Second Amendment (the "Amendment”) is to amend the following terms and conditions of the Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated September 10, 2012, (the “Note”) by and between Location Based Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), and Greggory Haugen (the “Lender”) (each a, “Party” both are, “Parties”).

 

WHEREAS, the Company is a publicly-held corporation with its common stock traded on the OTC Market under the symbol LBAS; and

 

WHEREAS, on September 10, 2012, the Company entered into a Secured Convertible Promissory Note with the Lender (as the same may from time to time be further amended, modified, supplemented or restated), in which the Lender may invest capital in the Company of Four Hundred Thousand Dollars ($400,000) in the form of secured convertible debt;

 

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Note:

 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants and agreements of the services rendered by the Lender to the Company, the following terms and conditions hereinafter set forth shall apply, and the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows:

 

 

Subsection (a) of Section 1 titled, “Terms of Repayment and Conversion”, shall be and is hereby amended as follows:

 

a.     Upon the execution and delivery of this Note, the Holder shall disburse to the Borrower the sum of $400,000; the amount actually received by the Borrower shall be the principal amount. All amounts outstanding under this Note shall mature and become due and payable on September 30, 2015 (the "Maturity Date"), subject to any prior payment required by this Note. At the Maturity Date, or during any time after April 15, 2015, the Lender shall have the right, but not the obligation, to convert this Note into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to the lower of of $0.20 per share or 50% of the closing stock price on the day after the Company is given notice of the conversion by the Lender (the “Conversion Price”). 

 

 

All other terms and conditions of the Note shall remain unchanged.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

{Signature Page to Follow}

 


 

1 




 


 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment to the Note has been executed this 27th day of February, 2015.

 

Borrower:

 

 

LOCATION BASED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 

 

 

By: _________________________________

            David M. Morse, CEO          

 

 

Date: February 27, 2015

 

Lender:

 

 Greggory Haugen

 

 

By: _____________________________

  Greggory S. Haugen     

 

Date:     February 27, 2015

 

 

2
#### § 779.114 Transportation employees.

Transportation employees of retail businesses, such as truck drivers or truck drivers' helpers, who regularly and recurrently cross State lines to make deliveries or to pick up goods for their employer; or who regularly and recurrently pick up at rail heads, air, bus or other such terminals goods originating out of State, or deliver to such terminals goods destined to points out of State; and dispatchers who route, plan or otherwise control such out-of-State deliveries and pick ups, are engaged in interstate commerce within the meaning of the Act.
----

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 7 June 2004

in Case T-333/02: Gestoras Pro-Amnistía and Others v Council of the European Union (1)

(Action for damages - Justice and home affairs - Common position of the Council - Measures concerning persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts - Manifest lack of jurisdiction - Action manifestly unfounded)

(2004/C 228/90)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-333/02, Gestoras Pro-Amnistía, Juan Mari Olano Olano, residing in Gradignan (France), Julen Zelarain Errasti, residing in Madrid (Spain), represented by D. Rouget, lawyer, v Council of the European Union (Agents: M. Vitsentzatos et M. Bauer), supported by the Kingdom of Spain, represented by its Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg, and by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Agents: initially P. Ormond, subsequently C. Jackson, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for damages as compensation for damage allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the inclusion of Gestoras Pro-Amnistía in the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts provided for in Article 1 of the Council Common Position of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (OJ 2001 L 344, p. 93), of the Council Common Position of 2 May 2002 updating Common Position 2001/931/CFSP (OJ 2002 L 116, p. 75), and of the Council Common Position of 17 June 2002 updating Common Position 2001/931/CFSP and repealing Common Position 2002/340/CFSP (OJ 2002 L 160, p. 32) — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and N. J. Forwood, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an Order on 7 June 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

----

(1)OJ C 19 of 25.1.2003.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 171 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 171

Memorializing fallen firefighters by lowering the United States flag to 
  half-staff on the day of the National Fallen Firefighters Memorial 
                    Service in Emmitsburg, Maryland.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2007

  Ms. Collins (for herself, Mr. Biden, Mr. McCain, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. 
Carper, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Levin, Mr. Pryor, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Lieberman, Ms. 
Snowe, Mr. Smith, Mr. Coleman, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Kennedy, Mrs. Clinton, 
   Mr. Bond, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Domenici, Mrs. Dole, Mrs. McCaskill, Mr. 
   Rockefeller, Mr. Voinovich, Mr. Obama, Mr. Lott, and Mr. Cardin) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

                              June 7, 2007

                Reported by Mr. Leahy, without amendment

                             June 11, 2007

                        Considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Memorializing fallen firefighters by lowering the United States flag to 
  half-staff on the day of the National Fallen Firefighters Memorial 
                    Service in Emmitsburg, Maryland.

Whereas 1,100,000 men and women comprise the fire service in the United States;
Whereas the fire service is considered one of the most dangerous professions in 
        the United States;
Whereas fire service personnel selflessly respond to over 22,500,000 emergency 
        calls annually, without reservation and with an unwavering commitment to 
        the safety of their fellow citizens;
Whereas fire service personnel are the first to respond to an emergency, whether 
        it involves a fire, medical emergency, spill of hazardous materials, 
        natural disaster, act of terrorism, or transportation accident; and
Whereas approximately 100 fire service personnel die annually in the line of 
        duty: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That this year, the United States flags on all Federal 
facilities should be lowered to half-staff on the day of the National 
Fallen Firefighters Memorial Service in Emmitsburg, Maryland.
                                 <all>
```
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-17-00310-CR

CRISTI JEANETTE SNOW, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from Criminal District 

Court No. 1

of Tarrant County (1445315D)

January 17, 2019

Opinion by Justice Bassel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

 Justice Dabney Bassel
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000              JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      11,903,508               11,903,508
<SECURITIES>                                 6,661,801                6,661,801
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,301,669                1,301,669
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,186                   19,186
<INVENTORY>                                    517,332                  517,332
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,047,949               21,047,949
<PP&E>                                       4,130,310                4,130,310
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,672,655                1,672,655
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,523,304               23,523,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,569,473                1,569,473
<BONDS>                                              0                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                        0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                        0
<COMMON>                                    34,576,792               34,576,792
<OTHER-SE>                                 (12,622,961)             (12,622,961)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,523,304               23,523,304
<SALES>                                        132,730                  235,164
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,730                  235,164
<CGS>                                          115,265                  115,634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,235,958                5,394,364
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,971,205)              (4,966,913)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,971,205)              (4,966,913)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (856,927)              (2,018,797)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                        0
<CHANGES>                                            0                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,828,132)              (6,985,710)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.20)                   (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.20)                   (0.37)



</TABLE>
#### Jerome ATILUS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 24161.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 8, 1967.

Richard R. Booth, Miami, Fla., for appellant.

Michael J. Osman, Asst. U. S. Atty., William A. Meadows, Jr., U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and WASHINGTON* and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 Senior Circuit Judge, D. C. Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the denial, without a hearing, of appellant’s motion under Section 2255 and a supplement later filed in which he asserts numerous grounds for setting aside the judgment of conviction.

Although we find that many of the grounds asserted are statements of conclusion, without the allegation of any facts, on which a hearing would be required, there is one substantial allegation that there was a severe language barrier that made it impossible for the appellant to understand what the proceedings were during his trial. He alleged that there was a language barrier by virtue of his being Creole French in an English-speaking court. Judging from the allegations contained in his petition, it seems apparent that there was a sufficient allegation of his inability to comprehend the nature of the proceedings, notwithstanding there was a court interpreter present, to require a hearing in the Section 2255 court.

The case is therefore remanded to the trial court to permit a hearing on this issue. Of course, if appellant has any other grounds for relief as to which he can assert substantial facts, these matters should also be inquired of at the same hearing, once they are adequately raised.

The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
# Error 503 Service Unavailable

Service Unavailable

### Guru Meditation:

XID: 155744890

Varnish cache server
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

39–011 2014

113th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 113–146 

NOTIFICATION OF THE U.S. SUPPORTING AN OPERATION TO DELIVER HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

A NOTIFICATION OF THE U.S. SUPPORTING AN OPERATION TO DELIVER HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE TO CIVILIANS IN THE TOWN 

OF AMIRLI, IRAQ 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2014.—Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 

ordered to be printed 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with HDOCE:\Seals\Congress.#13

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with HDOC
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, September 8, 2014. 

Hon. JOHN A. BOEHNER, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: As I reported on August 8 and 17 and on 

September 1, 2014, U.S. Armed Forces have conducted targeted 

airstrikes in Iraq for the limited purposes of stopping the advance 

on Erbil by the terrorist group Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant 

(ISIL), supporting civilians trapped on Mount Sinjar, supporting 

operations by Iraqi forces to recapture the Mosul Dam, and supporting an operation to deliver humanitarian assistance to civilians 

in the town of Amirli, Iraq. 

On September 6, 2014, pursuant to my authorization, U.S. 

Armed Forces commenced targeted airstrikes in the vicinity of the 

Haditha Dam in support of Iraqi forces in their efforts to retain 

control of and defend this critical infrastructure site from ISIL. 

These additional military operations will be limited in their scope 

and duration as necessary to address this threat and prevent 

endangerment of U.S. personnel and facilities and large numbers 

of Iraqi civilians. 

I have directed these actions, which are in the national security 

and foreign policy interests of the United States, pursuant to my 

constitutional authority to conduct U.S. foreign relations and as 

Commander in Chief and Chief Executive. These actions are being 

undertaken in coordination with and at the request of the Iraqi 

government. 

I am providing this report as part of my efforts to keep the Congress fully informed, consistent with the War Powers Resolution 

(Public Law 93–148). I appreciate the support of the Congress in 

this action. 

Sincerely, 

BARACK OBAMA. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with HDOC
! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # "! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # $! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # %! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # &! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # '! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # (! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # )! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # "! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # $! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # %! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # &! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # '! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # (! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # ! )! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # ! !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # ! "! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # ! #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # ! $! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # ! %! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # ! &! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # ! '! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # ! (! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # " )! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # "! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # " !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # " "! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # " #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # " $! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # " %! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # " &! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # " '! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # " (! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # # )! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # # !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # # "! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # # #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # # $! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # # %! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # # &! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # # '! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # # (! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # $ )! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # $

1 ( + ) ' 3 ( 1 ( 5 0 5 6 5

7 8 ( 3 6! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . ( / 0 ( 1 2 ( 3 4

- $ # $ !

9 ( : ; < = ( > ? & @ A > B > ? @ C D E B > A E F B @ G @ B B H E H ? ? > B D

D I J ? H E D E I

? & K L # K H B M . @ A J > ? > ? . ? @ C D E & F H N F . . D F H M & ? H H O I D . @ D P P > . @ ? G D E > N H
#### § 452.51 Declaration of candidacy.

A union may not adopt rules which in their effect discourage or paralyze any opposition to the incumbent officers. Therefore, it would not be a reasonable qualification to require members to file a declaration of candidacy several months in advance of the nomination meeting since such a requirement would have such effect and “serves no reasonable purpose which cannot otherwise be satisfied without resort to this procedure.”[31]

###### Footnotes -
  452.51

[31] *Wirtz* v. *Local 30, IUOE,* 242 F. Supp. 631 (S.D. N.Y. 1965) reversed as moot 366 F.2d 438 (C.A. 2, 1966), reh. den. 366 F.2d 438.
#### § 776.22 Subpart limited to individual employee coverage.

This subpart, which was adopted before the amendments of 1961 and 1966 to the Fair Labor Standards Act, is limited to discussion of the traditional general coverage of employees employed in activities of the character performed in the construction industry, which depends on whether such employees are, individually, “engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce” within the meaning of the Act. The 1961 and 1966 amendments broadened coverage by extending it to other employees of the construction industry on an “enterprise” basis, as explained in § 776.22a. Employees covered under the principles discussed in this subpart remain covered under the Act as amended; however, an employee who would not be individually covered under the principles discussed in this subpart may now be subject to the Act if he is employed in an enterprise engaged in covered construction as defined in the amendments.

[35 FR 5543, Apr. 3, 1970]
#### § 38.21 Interpretation of this part.

The Director will make any rulings under, or interpretations of, the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIOA or this part.
#### § 570.25 Effect on laws other than the Federal child labor standards.

No provision of this subpart shall under any circumstances justify or be construed to permit noncompliance with the provisions of any other Federal law or of any State law or municipal ordinance establishing higher standards than those established under this subpart.
Exhibit 10.12



 Exhibit 10.12 

CoLucid Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 

Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy 

Each director of CoLucid Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) who is not an officer or employee of the Company shall receive the
following compensation (known as the non-employee director compensation policy): 
 Annual retainer: $40,000 per director except for the
chairperson who shall receive $65,000, payable in cash 
 Committee chairs: Annual retainers, payable in cash, of: 

 

					
	 Audit Committee:
		$	15,000	  
	 Compensation Committee:
		$	10,000	  
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee:
		$	7,500	  

 Non-statutory stock option grants: 
  

	 	•	 	To purchase up to $45,000 of the Company’s common stock calculated as the grant date fair value of the stock-based awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 on the date of each annual meeting of the
Company’s stockholders using the closing sale price per share of the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market on the date of the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. 


 

	 	•	 	Granted to directors who are serving as directors of the Company immediately following the annual meeting of stockholders at an exercise price per share equal to the closing sale price per share of the Company’s
common stock on the Stock Exchange on the date of the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. 

  

	 	•	 	Vests immediately prior to the start of the Company’s first annual meeting of stockholders following the date of grant, provided the recipient remains a member of the board as of the vesting date.


  

	 	•	 	Maximum term of ten years measured from the date of grant. 

 Reimbursement of expenses: The
Company shall reimburse directors for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attending board and committee meetings.