alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 38.26 Duration and scope of the assurance. ( a ) Where the WIOA Title I financial assistance is intended to provide, or is in the form of, either personal property, real property, structures on real property, or interest in any such property or structures, the assurance will obligate the recipient, or (in the case of a subsequent transfer) the transferee, for the longer of: ( 1 ) The period during which the property is used either: ( i ) For a purpose for which WIOA Title I financial assistance is extended; or
( ii ) For another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits; or
( 2 ) The period during which either: ( i ) The recipient retains ownership or possession of the property; or
( ii ) The transferee retains ownership or possession of the property without compensating the Departmental grantmaking agency for the fair market value of that ownership or possession.
( b ) In all other cases, the assurance will obligate the recipient for the period during which WIOA Title I financial assistance is extended.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 21, 2017

NO. 03
- 14
- 00712
- CR

Anthony Torres, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTI CES PEMBERTON AND FI ELD MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART; AFFIRMED

— OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment s of conviction rend ered by the district court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court ho lds that there was reversible error in the district court’s judgment of conviction for the offense of sexual assault in a prohibited relationship. Therefore, the Court modifies the judgment of conviction for the first

- degr ee felony offense of sexual assault in a prohibited relationship to reflect that Torres was convicted of the second

- degree felony offense of sexual assault, affirms the judgment as modified as to the finding of guilt, reverses that part of the judgment imp osing sentence, and remands to the district court for a new punishment hearing for that offense. The Court further holds that there was no error in the court’s judgment of conviction for the offense of prohibited sexual conduct that requires reversal. Th erefore, the Court affirms the judgment of conviction for the offense ofprohibited sexual conduct. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                     SIENA HOLDINGS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

                              CORPORATE STRUCTURE
                                 JUNE 30, 1997

     The consolidated structure of the Company is set forth in the following
table which identifies each corporate entity's subsidiaries and shows the state
of incorporation in which each of  SHI and its subsidiaries are incorporated.
Except as otherwise specified, each entity is headquartered at 717 North
Harwood in Dallas.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                State of
Corporation                                                                                   Incorporation
-----------                                                                                   -------------
<S>                                                                                              <C>
Siena Holdings, Inc (formerly Lomas Financial Corporation) (1) ..........................     Delaware
   Siena Information Systems, Inc (formerly Lomas Information Systems) ..................     Nevada
   Siena Management, Inc (formerly Lomas Management, Inc.) ..............................     Nevada
   Siena Properties, Inc (formerly Lomas Properties, Inc.) ..............................     Texas
       Louisiana National Land Corporation (5) ..........................................     Louisiana
       Siena Investment Properties, Inc (formerly Lomas Investment Properties, Inc.) ....     Nevada
       Naples Bay View, Inc (5) .........................................................     Florida
   Financial Insurance Ltd.(3) (5) ......................................................     Bermuda
   Siena Housing Management Corp (formerly Lomas Housing Management Corp.) ..............     Texas
   Roosevelt Office Center, Inc.(4) (5) .................................................     New York
   Vistamar, Inc ........................................................................     Puerto Rico
   LLG Lands, Inc .......................................................................     Arkansas
</TABLE>

Notes to Table of Corporate Structure:
(1)  Unless otherwise stated, each affiliated entity is a corporation and is
     100 percent owned by the indicated parent company.
(2)  100 percent of common stock owned by LFC but only 50 percent of the voting
     stock  Preferred stock owned by third parties including 50 percent of the
     voting stock.
(3)  Located at Dorchester House, P O Box HM2020, Church Street, Hamilton 5,
     Bermuda.
(4)  Located at 67 Wall Street, Suite 2411, New York, New York 10005.
(5)  Dissolution pending.
#### Lucien B. Terry and Orrin Terry, Pl’ffs and Resp’ts, *v.*Henry Bange, Def't and App’lt.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,*

*Filed May 13, 1889.)*

Receiver of defendant—Appointment of in another county—When REGULAR.

A transcript of a judgment entered in the superior court of the city of New York was filed in the county court of Kings county, and the county judge of that county appointed a receiver of the defendant in said judgment. *Held,*that the appointment of the receiver was regular, and a motion to vacate his appointment was properly denied.

The judgment upon which the receiver was appointed was originally entered in the supreme court of the city of New York against Henry Bange in favor of Lucien B. Terry and Orrin Terry. A transcript of this judgment was filed in the county court of Kings county, and the then judge of that court, Hon. Samuel G-arrison, October 6, 1862, appointed William Balen receiver of the defendant.

The receiver, in 1863, commenced proceedings against the defendant and one Ezra L. Bushnell, to recover property in said Bushnell’s hands, fraudulently transferred to him by the defendant, with intent to hinder and delay the plaintiffs and other creditors of said Bange. A referee was subsequently appointed, who found all the facts in favor of the contention of the receiver. On July 25, 1888, the defendant moved, before Hon. Henry A. Moore, as county judge of Kings county, to vacate the order of Judge G-arrison, appointing the receiver, and to set aside all the proceedings of the referee. The motion was denied, and this appeal was taken from the order denying the motion.

*H. M. Whitehead,*for app’lt; *N. Merrill*and *William C.*Holbrook, for William Balen, receiver.

Dykman, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the county judge of Kings county, denying a motion to vacate an order appointing a receiver in proceedings supplementary to execution, and remove his bond from the files of the county clerk and vacate all his proceedings.

The motion was made by the judgment-debtor, .and the order which he desires to annul was made in October, 1862, after his appointment, and in the year 1863, the receiver commenced an action against the judgment-debtor and Ezra L. Bushnell, for the recovery of property alleged to have been transferred by the judgment-debtor in fraud of creditors, which has been tried before a referee, who found all the facts in favor of the receiver, and among other things found in favor of his appointment, that is that he was regularly appointed as such receiver.

Our conclusion also is that the appointment of the re*600ceiver was regular, and that the motion for his removal was properly denied.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         107,867
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,848,214
<DEPRECIATION>                                (881,923)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,360,382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           80,367
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,792
<OTHER-SE>                                    (421,872)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,360,382
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               235,835
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  150,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              82,754
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (107,294)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (107,294)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (107,294)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.22)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 102 (Thursday, May 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13093]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Region IV, North Florida District; Jacksonville, Florida; 
Advisory Council Meeting; Public Meeting

    The U. S. Small Business Administration, North Florida District 
Office, Jacksonville, Florida, Advisory Council will hold a public 
meeting from 2 p.m. to 3 p.m., June 15, 2000, at the Caribe Royale 
Resort, 14300 International Drive, Orlando, Florida, in conjunction 
with the SBA Florida State Lenders' Conference, to discuss such matters 
as may be presented by members, staff of the U. S. Small Business 
Administration, or others present. For further information, write or 
call Claudia D. Taylor, U. S. Small Business Administration, 7825 
Baymeadows Way, Suite 100-B, Jacksonville, Florida 32256-7504, 
telephone (904) 443-1933.

Bettie Baca,
Counselor to the Administrator/Public Liaison.
[FR Doc. 00-13093 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲ ▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/27

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 27 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136208 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 136208 

 COA: 282867 

Wayne CC: 07-008850

MELISSA BRADBURY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0721 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 29, 2008 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000059593
<NAME> LINDBERG CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         272,649
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,492,480
<ALLOWANCES>                                   654,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,767,742
<PP&E>                                     134,055,319
<DEPRECIATION>                              62,693,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             132,011,078
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,855,083
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        66,734
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,326,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               132,011,078
<SALES>                                    120,482,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           120,482,625
<CGS>                                       86,618,120
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               86,618,120
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            19,067,393
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,229,348
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,686,244
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,089,241
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,597,003
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,597,003
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.27


</TABLE>
#### § 452.133 Election of delegates not members of the labor organization.

A labor organization's constitution and bylaws may authorize the election of delegates who are not members of the subordinate labor organization they represent, provided the members of the subordinate organization are also eligible to be candidates.
(75 South. 1007)

#### SPRINGFIELD v. TEER.

(6 Div. 333.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 19, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Tuscaloosa County; H. B. Foster, Judge.

Wright & Fite, of Tuscaloosa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed for want of prosecution.
#### § 458.32 Provision for accounting and financial controls.

Every labor organization shall provide accounting and financial controls necessary to assure the maintenance of fiscal integrity.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 10578 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
LEO DILLON , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:13

- CR

- 295

- 5

Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Leo Dillon is charged with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 1,000 kilograms or more of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(A)(vii) . He appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of its previous order affirming the magistrate judge ’s ruling revoking Dillon’s pretrial release and ordering him detained

. In its response to Dillon’s appeal, the Government moves to dismiss the appeal as untimely.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 30, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-10578 Document: 00513136043 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/30/2015No. 15

- 10578

2 A detention order is a final decision over which we have appellate jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 18 U.S.C. § 3145(c). “In a criminal case, a defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed in the district court within 14 days after . . . the entry of . . . the order being appealed.” F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 4 (b)(1)(A)(i). Dillon’s notice of ap peal was not filed in a timely manner, nor was it filed within the permissible extension period of Rule 4(b)(4). The time limit set forth in Rule 4(b)(1)(A) is mandatory, but it is not jurisdictional. United States v. Martinez , 496 F.3d 387, 388

- 89 (5th Cir. 2007) (citing Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 207

- 14 (2007)). Although the requirements of Rule 4(b)(1)(A) may be waived , see Martinez , 496 F.3d at 388

- 89, the Government has not waived the issue in the instant case. Ac cordingly, the Government’s motion is GRANTED , and the appeal is DISMISSED. Case: 15-10578 Document: 00513136043 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/30/2015
§ 453.22 Prohibition of certain activities by unbonded persons. ( a ) Section 502(a) provides that persons who are not covered by bonds as required by that section shall not be permitted to receive, handle, disburse, or otherwise exercise custody or control of the funds or other property of a labor organization or of a trust in which a labor organization is interested. This prohibits personnel who are required to be bonded, as explained in § 453.8 from performing any of these acts without being covered by the required bonds. In addition, this provision makes it unlawful for any person with power to do so to delegate or assign the duties of receiving, handling, disbursing, or otherwise exercising custody or control of such funds or property to any person who is not bonded in accordance with the provisions of section 502(a).
( b ) The legislative history of the Act indicates, however, that it was not the intent of Congress to make compliance with the bonding requirements of section 502(a) a condition on the right of banks or other financial institutions to serve as the depository of the funds of labor organizations or trusts. Similarly, it appears that the provisions of that section do not require the bonding of brokers or other independent contractors who have contracted with labor organizations or trusts for the performance of functions which are normally not carried out by such labor organizations' or trusts' own officials or employees, such as the buying of securities, the performance of other investment functions, or the transportation of funds by armored truck.[12]
Footnotes -
453.22
[12] See § 453.6(b).
<PAGE>  1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     Exhibit 11

                    COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

                                                         Years Ended December 31,
                                                         ------------------------
<S>                                            <C>             <C>             <C>
                                                      1997            1996            1995
EARNINGS                                              ----            ----            ----

Earnings from Continuing Operations            $ 6,961,090     $ 4,838,274     $ 4,172,840
Earnings (Loss) from Discontinued Operations    (6,698,240)        178,118       1,461,676
                                               -----------     -----------     -----------

    Net Earnings                               $   262,850     $ 5,016,392     $ 5,634,516
                                               ===========     ===========     ===========
SHARES
------

Weighted Average Number of
Common Shares Outstanding
(See Note)                                       4,806,834       4,756,789       4,724,489
Additional Shares Assuming
Conversion of Stock Options                        125,994         103,766          39,002
                                                 ---------       ---------       ---------
Weighted Average Common Shares
Outstanding and Equivalents                      4,932,828       4,860,555       4,763,491
                                                 =========       =========       =========

Basic Earnings Per Share:
 Earnings From Continuing Operations               $  1.45         $  1.01         $   .89
 Earnings (Loss) From Discontinued Operations        (1.40)            .04             .30
                                                   -------         -------         -------
    Net Earnings                                   $   .05         $  1.05         $  1.19
                                                   =======         =======         =======

Diluted Earnings Per Share:
 Earnings From Continuing Operations               $  1.41         $   .99         $   .88
 Earnings (Loss) From Discontinued Operations        (1.36)            .04             .30
                                                   -------         -------         -------
    Net Earnings                                   $   .05         $  1.03         $  1.18
                                                   =======         =======         =======

Note:  All activity during the year has been adjusted for the number of days
in the year that the shares were outstanding.

</TABLE>
SECTION 32.0

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Bancorp of Indiana, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


                                          /s/ Michael H. Head
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Michael H. Head
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer


                                          /s/ George J. Smith
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          George J. Smith
                                          Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: November 12, 2004