alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 5 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
S. J. RES. 5

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2007

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proclaiming Casimir Pulaski to be an honorary citizen of the United 
                          States posthumously.

Whereas Casimir Pulaski was a Polish military officer who fought on the side of 
        the American colonists against the British in the American Revolutionary 
        War;
Whereas Benjamin Franklin recommended that General George Washington accept 
        Casimir Pulaski as a volunteer in the American Cavalry and said that 
        Pulaski was ``renowned throughout Europe for the courage and bravery he 
        displayed in defense of his country's freedom'';
Whereas after arriving in America, Casimir Pulaski wrote to General Washington, 
        ``I came here, where freedom is being defended, to serve it, and to live 
        or die for it.'';
Whereas the first military engagement of Casimir Pulaski with the British was on 
        September 11, 1777, at the Battle of Brandywine, and his courageous 
        charge in this engagement averted a disastrous defeat of the American 
        Cavalry and saved the life of George Washington;
Whereas on September 15, 1777, George Washington elevated Casimir Pulaski to the 
        rank of Brigadier General of the American Cavalry;
Whereas Casimir Pulaski formed the Pulaski Cavalry Legion, and in February 1779, 
        this legion ejected the British occupiers from Charleston, South 
        Carolina;
Whereas in October 1779, Casimir Pulaski mounted an assault against British 
        forces in Savannah, Georgia;
Whereas on the morning of October 9, 1779, Casimir Pulaski was mortally wounded 
        and was taken aboard the American ship USS Wasp, where he died at sea on 
        October 11, 1779;
Whereas before the end of 1779, the Continental Congress resolved that a 
        monument should be erected in honor of Casimir Pulaski;
Whereas in 1825, General Lafayette laid the cornerstone for the Casimir Pulaski 
        monument in Savannah, Georgia; and
Whereas in 1929, Congress passed a resolution recognizing October 11 of each 
        year as Pulaski Day in the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Casimir Pulaski is 
proclaimed to be an honorary citizen of the United States posthumously.

            Passed the Senate March 19, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
§ 452.104 Proximity of notice to election. ( a ) The statutory requirement for giving fifteen days' notice of election is a minimum standard. There is no objection to giving more notice than is required by law. However, it was clearly the intent of Congress to have members notified at a time which reasonably precedes the date of the election. For example, notice in a union publication which is expected to cover elections to be held six months later would not be considered reasonable.
( b ) Should a union change the date of an election from the date originally announced in the mail notice to the members, it must mail a second notice, containing the corrected date, at least fifteen days before the election.
#### § 502.22 Civil money penalties—payment and collection.

Where the assessment is directed in a final order by the Administrator, WHD, by an ALJ, or by the ARB, the amount of the penalty is due within 30 days and payable to the United States Department of Labor. The person assessed such penalty shall remit promptly the amount thereof as finally determined, to the Administrator, WHD by certified check or by money order, made payable to the order of *Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor.* The remittance shall be delivered or mailed to the WHD Regional Office for the area in which the violations occurred.
Motion for Extension of Time PAGE 0 **IN THE SUPREME COURT**  **FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA**  No. DA 23

- 0250 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee , v. RONALD L. GOLAS , Defendant and Appellant

. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Defendant and Appellant ’s Motion For Extension Of Time , and with good cause shown, Defendant and Appellant Ronald Golas is hereby granted an extension of time until September 13, 2024 in which to prepare, file and serve Defendant and Appellant ’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 6 2024

09/06/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0250
#### § 779.216 Statutory construction of the terms.

The terms “unified operation” and “common control” do not have a fixed legal or technical meaning. As used in the definition, these and other terms must be given an interpretation consistent with the Congressional intention to be ascertained from the context in which they are used, the legislation of which they form a part, and the legislative history. In extending coverage of the Act on an “enterprise” basis, the Congress intended, by the 1961 and 1966 amendments to cover, among others, business organizations and chain store systems which may perform their related activities through complex business arrangements or business structures, whether they perform their activities for a common business purpose through unified operation or through the retention or exercise of control. For these reasons, the definition of the term “enterprise” is stated in broad general terms. This legislative intent is evidenced both by the statements in the Committee Reports and by the definition itself, particularly the broad references to the inclusion in the “enterprise” of “all such activities” whether performed “in one or more establishments” or “by one or more corporate or other organizational units.” When the Act was amended in 1966 the Congress further broadened coverage by redefining an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce in section 3(s). (See § 779.22.) Where the Congress intended to exclude certain arrangements or activities from the “enterprise” it did so by specific provision under the prior and amended Act.
§ 553.224 “Work period” defined. ( a ) As used in section 7(k), the term “work period” refers to any established and regularly recurring period of work which, under the terms of the Act and legislative history, cannot be less than 7 consecutive days nor more than 28 consecutive days. Except for this limitation, the work period can be of any length, and it need not coincide with the duty cycle or pay period or with a particular day of the week or hour of the day. Once the beginning and ending time of an employee's work period is established, however, it remains fixed regardless of how many hours are worked within the period. The beginning and ending of the work period may be changed, provided that the change is intended to be permanent and is not designed to evade the overtime compensation requirements of the Act.
( b ) An employer may have one work period applicable to all employees, or different work periods for different employees or groups of employees.
§ 780.116 Commodities included by reference to the Agricultural Marketing Act. ( a ) Section 3(f) expressly provides that the term “agricultural or horticultural commodities” shall include the commodities defined as agricultural commodities in section 15(g) of the Agricultural Marketing Act, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1141-1141j). Section 15(g) of that Act provides: “As used in this act, the term ‘agricultural commodity’ includes, in addition to other agricultural commodities, crude gum (oleoresin) from a living tree, and the following products as processed by the original producers of the crude gum (oleoresin) from which derived: Gum spirits of turpentine, and gum resin, as defined in the Naval Stores Act, approved March 3, 1923” (7 U.S.C. 91-99). As defined in the Naval Stores Act, “ ‘gum spirits of turpentine’ means spirits of turpentine made from gum (oleoresin) from a living tree” and “ ‘gum rosin’ means rosin remaining after the distillation of gum spirits of turpentine.” The production of these commodities is therefore within the definition of “agriculture.”
( b ) Since the only oleoresin included within section 15(g) of the Agricultural Marketing Act is that derived from a living tree, the production of oleoresin from stumps or any sources other than living trees is not within section 3(f). If turpentine or rosin is produced in any manner other than the processing of crude gum from living trees, as by digging up pine stumps and grinding them or by distilling the turpentine with steam from the oleoresin within or extracted from the wood, the production of the turpentine or rosin is not included in section 3(f).
( c ) Similarly, the production of gum turpentine or gum rosin is not included when these are produced by anyone other than the original producer of the crude gum from which they are derived. Thus, if a producer of turpentine or rosin from oleoresin from living trees makes such products not only from oleoresin produced by him but also from oleoresin delivered to him by others, he is not producing a product defined as an agricultural commodity and employees engaged in his production operations are not agricultural employees. (For an explanation of the inclusion of the word “production” in section 3(f), see § 780.117(b).) It is to be noted, however, that the production of gum turpentine and gum rosin from crude gum (oleoresin) derived from a living tree is included within section 3(f) when performed at a central still for and on account of the producer of the crude gum. But where central stills buy the crude gum they process and are the owners of the gum turpentine and gum rosin that are derived from such crude gum and which they market for their own account, the production of such gum turpentine and gum rosin is not within section 3(f).
#### § 452.18 Constitutional officers.

A constitutional officer refers to a person holding a position identified as an officer by the constitution and bylaws of the labor organization. Thus, for example, a legislative representative of a labor organization who performs no executive functions and whose duties are confined to promoting the interests of members in legislative matters is nevertheless an officer who is required to be elected where the labor organization's constitution identifies the holder of such a position as an officer. On the other hand, legislative representatives who are required to be elected by the constitution and bylaws of a labor organization are not considered to be officers within the meaning of the Act if they are not designated as such by the constitution, are not members of any executive board or similar governing body, and do not perform executive functions. As defined in the Act, however, the term “officer” is not limited to individuals in positions identified as such or provided for in the constitution or other organic law of the labor organization.[17] The post of Honorary President, President Emeritus or Past President that is to be assumed by the retiring chief executive officer of a union would not be an officer position unless it is designated as an officer position by the union's constitution, or the holder of the position performs executive functions or serves on an executive board or similar governing body.

###### Footnotes -
  452.18

[17] Cf. *NLRB* v. *Coca-Cola Bottling Co.,* 350 U.S. 264 (1956). See also, Daily Cong. Rec. 5867, Sen., Apr. 23, 1959.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 157 (Monday, August 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 50494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20620]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[NPS-PWR-PWRO-0714-7930; 8381-1001-NZW]


Water Resources Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement, 
Mojave National Preserve, San Bernardino County, CA

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Extension of Scoping Period for Water Resources 
Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement for Mojave National 
Preserve.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Sec.  102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969, the National Park Service is preparing a Water 
Resources Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement (WRMP/EIS). 
This plan is intended to guide future management of ground and surface 
water sources within Mojave National Preserve. The original Notice of 
Intent to prepare an EIS (published in the Federal Register on May 11, 
2011) announced a 60-day public comment period. In recognition of the 
complexity and scope of the forthcoming EIS, and with deference to 
interest from the public and interested organizations, the comment 
period has been extended.

DATES: Comments must be received by August 12, 2011.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: It will not be necessary for individuals, 
orgnaizations, and agencies that have already commented to do so again. 
All comments must now be postmarked or transmitted not later than 
August 12, 2011. Those respondents who prefer to comment electronically 
may do so via the project Web site, http://parkplanning.nps.gov/mojave_water, or letters may be submitted via regular mail to: 
Stephanie Dubois, Superintendent, Mojave National Preserve, Attn: 
Mojave WRMP, 2701 Barstow Road, Barstow, California 92311. Up-to-date 
information may be obtained by contacting Mojave National Preserve at 
(760) 252-6100.
    Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

    Dated: July 8, 2011.
Patricia L. Neubacher,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 2011-20620 Filed 8-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-6E-P
§ 776.7 Geographical scope of coverage. ( a ) The geographical areas within which the employees are to be deemed “engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce” within the meaning of the Act, and thus within its coverage are governed by definitions in section 3 (b), (c), and (j). In the definition of “produced” in section 3(j), “production” is expressly confined to described employments “in any State.” (See § 776.15 (a).) “Commerce” is defined to mean described activities “among the several States or between any State and any place outside thereof.” (See § 776.8.) “State” is defined in section 3(c) to mean “any State of the United States or the District of Columbia or any Territory or possession of the United States.”
( b ) Under the definitions in paragraph (a) of this section, employees within the District of Columbia; Puerto Rico; the Virgin Islands; Outer Continental Shelf lands defined in the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (ch. 345, 67 Stat. 462, 43 U.S.C. 1331); American Samoa; Guam; Wake Island; Enewetok Atoll; Kwajalein Atoll; Johnston Island; and the Canal Zone are dealt with on the same basis as employees working in any of the 50 States.[20] Congress did not exercise the national legislative power over the District of Columbia or the Territories or possessions referred to by extending the Act to purely local commerce within them.
[15 FR 2925, May 17, 1950, as amended at 35 FR 5543, Apr. 3, 1970] Footnotes -
776.7
[20] An amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 71 Stat. 514 (approved Aug. 30, 1957) provides that no employer shall be subject to any liability or punishment under the Act with respect to work performed at any time in work places excluded from the Act's coverage by this law or for work performed prior to Nov. 29, 1957, on Guam, Wake Island, or the Canal Zone; or for work performed prior to the establishment, by the Secretary, of a minimum wage rate applicable to such work in American Samoa. Work performed by employees in “a work place within a foreign country or within territory under the jurisdiction of the United States” other than those enumerated in this paragraph is exempt by this amendment from coverage under the Act. When part of the work performed by an employee for an employer in any workweek is covered work performed in any State, it makes no difference where the remainder of such work is performed; the employee is entitled to the benefits of the Act for the entire workweek unless he comes within some specific exemption. The reference in 71 Stat. 514 to liability for work performed in American Samoa is an extension of the relief granted by the American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956 (29 U.S.C. Supp. IV, secs. 206, 213, and 216).
#### § 4062.11 Computation of time.

The PBGC applies the rules in subpart D of part 4000 of this chapter to compute any time period under this part. However, for purposes of determining the amount of an interest charge under § 4062.7, the rule in § 4000.43(a) of this chapter governing periods ending on weekends or Federal holidays does not apply.

[68 FR 61354, Oct. 28, 2003. Redesignated at 71 FR 34822, June 16, 2006]
## United States Court of Appeals
**For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________

No. 23

- 3284

___________________________ William L. Stringer

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

LaDonna Wilcox, Sergeant of Property; Adam Benda, Property Captain; Chris Tripp, Warden, Iowa State Penitentiary; John Martinez, Property Captain; Robin

Bagby, Assistant Deputy Director/Retired; Chad Congas, Shift Captain; Doug

Bolton, Deputy Warden; Linda Koechle, Correctional Officer; Terry Hamm, Business Office Supervisor I.S.P.; Randy Gibbs, Deputy Director of Institutions; Beth Skinner, Director of the Iowa Department of Corrections; Rebecca Bowker, Executive Officer/Grievance Officer; Brad Hoenig, Associate Warden of Treatment

Defendants - Appellees

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central

____________

Submitted: July 23 , 2024 Filed: July 26, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN

, GRUENDER , and BENTON , Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.-2- William Stringer appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

After careful de novo review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court

. See Jessie v. Potter

, 516 F.3d 709, 712 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review)

.

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.
Exhibit 4.35


 


POWER OF ATTORNEY


 


I, Yang Jing, a citizen of the People's Republic
of China (the “PRC”), PRC ID card number 532721197005100025, hereby irrevocably authorize Beijing Jingwei Sinan
Information Technology Co.,Ltd (“WFOE”) or the individual or entity that is designated by WFOE (each, a “Representative”)
to the extent permitted by applicable laws of the PRC, as my sole attorney to singly exercise the following powers and rights during
the term of this Power of Attorney (“POA”).


 


I hereby authorize and designate the Representative
to vote on my behalf at the shareholders' meetings of Beijing Jingwei Zhihui Information Technology Co.,Ltd (“PRC Company”)
and exercise the full voting rights as its shareholder as granted to me by law and under the Articles of Association of PRC Company,
including but not limited to, the right to propose the holding of shareholders' meeting, to accept any notification about the holding
and discussion procedure of the meeting, to attend the shareholders' meeting of PRC Company and exercise the full voting rights
(such as to serve as my authorized representative at the shareholders' meeting of PRC Company, to designate and appoint the executive
director or directors of the board of PRC Company and the general manager and to decide the allotment of the profits, etc.), and
to sell or transfer any or all of my equity interest in PRC Company.


 


In exercising the rights and powers provided
hereunder, the Representative shall act with due care and diligence and pursuant to this POA and the applicable laws.


 


The term of this Power of Attorney is ten (10)
years from its date of execution, and shall be automatically terminate upon the assignment of the loan in the principal amount
of Nine Hundred Ninety Thousand Renminbi from WFOE to the undersigned, to a third party acceptable to WFOE.


 


	 	Yang Jing
	 	 
	 	/s/ Yang Jing 
	 	Date: May 22nd, 2014
###### Editorial Note on Part 6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 6 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

#### § 6.35 Ineligible lists.

Upon the final decision of the Administrative Law Judge or Administrative Review Board, as appropriate, regarding violations of any statute listed in § 5.1 of part 5 of this title other than the Davis-Bacon Act, the Administrator promptly shall foward to the Comptroller General the name of any respondent found to have committed aggravated or willful violations of the labor standards provisions of such statute, and the name of any firm, corporation, partnership, or association in which such respondent has a substantial interest. Upon the final decision of the Administrative Law Judge or Administrative Review Board, as appropriate, regarding violations of the Davis-Bacon Act, the Administrator promptly shall forward to the Comptroller General any recommendation regarding debarment action against a respondent, and the name of any firm, corporation, partnership, or association in which such respondent has an interest.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women Who Work in Offices

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Byrne, Harriet A. (Harriet Anne), 1892-. 						*Women Who Work in Offices : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 132*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1935,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5422,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER