alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       9,676,579
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       2,244,604
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  9,820,604
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      84,226,566
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        81,828,013
<LOANS>                                    218,317,223
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,513,439
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             335,505,927
<DEPOSITS>                                 228,790,678
<SHORT-TERM>                                11,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,166,206
<LONG-TERM>                                 20,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    27,626,917
<OTHER-SE>                                  44,922,126
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             335,505,927
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,392,179
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,471,461
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                92,434
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,956,074
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,334,291
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,689,771
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,266,303
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   60,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,743,672
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,669,183
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,092,183
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.27
<LOANS-NON>                                    330,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,454,373
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,509
<RECOVERIES>                                       575
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,513,439
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         3,513,439
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Occupational Manpower and Training Needs

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Occupational Manpower and Training Needs : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1824*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 										1974,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4795,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00166

- CV

D IANE B OZANICH R ATLEY

, Appellant

V

.

W ILLIAM D AVID R ATLEY

, Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 362nd Distric t Court

of Denton County ( 19

- 9876

- 362 )

September 23, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismisse d for want of

jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

__________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
#### § 778.116 Payments other than cash.

Where payments are made to employees in the form of goods or facilities which are regarded as part of wages, the reasonable cost to the employer or the fair value of such goods or of furnishing such facilities must be included in the regular rate. (See part 531 of this chapter for a discussion as to the inclusion of goods and facilities in wages and the method of determining reasonable cost.) Where, for example, an employer furnishes lodging to his employees in addition to cash wages the reasonable cost or the fair value of the lodging (per week) must be added to the cash wages before the regular rate is determined.

[46 FR 7310, Jan. 23, 1981]
Exhibit  32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Visualant,  Incorporated  on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry Goldberg,  Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary Treasurer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                      /s/ Jerry D. Goldberg
                      ----------------------------------------------
                      Jerry D. Goldberg
                      Chief Financial Officer
                      and Secretary-Treasurer

Date:  May 11,  2006
Exhibit
32.1


STATEMENT
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Charles S. Conoley, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements
      included in such Report.





/s/Charles
S. Conoley


President
and Chief Executive Officer


August
14, 2009
#### § 570.105 “Producer, manufacturer, or dealer”.

It will be observed that the prohibition of section 12(a) with respect to certain shipments or deliveries for shipment is confined to those made by producers, manufacturers, and dealers. The terms “producer, manufacturer, or dealer” used in this provision are not expressly defined by the statute. However, in view of the definition of “produced” in section 3(j), for purposes of this section a “producer” is considered to be one who engages in producing, manufacturing, handling or in any other manner working on goods in any State.[5] Since manufacturing is considered a specialized form of production, the word “manufacturer” does not have as broad an application as the word “producer.” Manufacturing generally involves the transformation of raw materials or semifinished goods into new or different articles. A person may be considered a “manufacturer” even though his goods are made by hand, as is often true of products made by homeworkers. Moreover, it is immaterial whether manufacturing is his sole or main business. Thus, the term includes retailers who, in addition to retail selling, engage in such manufacturing activities as the making of slip-covers or curtains, the baking of bread, the making of candy, or the making of window frames. The word “dealer” refers to anyone who deals in goods (as defined in section 3(i) of the Act),[6] including persons engaged in buying, selling, trading, distributing, delivering, etc. It includes middlemen, factors, brokers, commission merchants, wholesalers, retailers and the like.

###### Footnotes -
  570.105

[5] For a discussion of the definition of “produced” as it relates to section 12(a), see § 570.108.

[6] See § 570.107.
#### § 453.7 “Funds or other property” of a labor organization or of a trust in which a labor organization is interested.

The affirmative requirement for bonding the specified personnel is applicable only if they handle “funds or other property” of the labor organization or trust concerned. A consideration of the purpose of section 502 and a reading of the section as a whole, including provisions for fixing the amount of bonds, suffice to show that the term “funds or other property”, as used in this section of the Act, encompasses more than cash alone but that it does not embrace all of the property of a labor organization or of a trust in which a labor organization is interested. The term does not include property of a relatively permanent nature, such as land, buildings, furniture, fixtures and office and delivery equipment used in the operations of a labor organization or trust. It does, however, include items in the nature of quick assets, such as checks and other negotiable instruments, government obligations and marketable securities, as well as cash, and other property held, not for use, but for conversion into cash or for similar purposes making it substantially equivalent to funds.
#### MUSGROVE, et al. v DADE COUNTY, etc., et al.

Case No. 86-092 AP

Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Appellate Division, Dade County

January 20, 1987

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

John G. Fletcher for appellants.

Sheridan K. Weissenborn for appellees.

Before TENDRICH, FEDER, SHAPIRO, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

RICHARD Y. FEDER, Judge.

The within matter is an appeal from the granting of a rezoning by the Dade County Commission. We reverse.

*185The property in question, as rezoned, would be an 8.5 acre commercial island floating in a sea of residential and agricultural properties. Although there are adjoining properties used as religious houses of worship or educational institutions, such uses are consistent with the character of the residential and agricultural neighborhood. The within hundred and forty thousand square foot office complex is not.

The litmus test to be applied by this court is the “fairly debatable” one; i.e., whether the action of the Commission, in light of the evidence, neighborhood, master plan, etc., is one where reasonable people could fairly debate the merits of the action taken or whether it was arbitrary and capricious. See *Skagg’s-Albertson’s v. ABC Liquors, Inc.,*363 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 1978), *City of Miami Beach v. Lachman,*71 So.2d 148 (Fla. 1953), *Smith v. City of Miami Beach,*213 So.2d 281 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968). This court cannot sit as a second County Commission disagreeing with arguably reasonable decisions of that legislative body. The court must act as a judicial branch, not a legislative one.

If the decision below is reasonably based, even though this court might have reached an opposite result, affirmance is required. *Wolff v. Dade County,*370 So.2d 839 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Examining the record and using the above guidelines, this court finds that the decision to rezone this property is not based on reason, nor could reasonable people debate it — fairly or otherwise. Therefore, the decision to rezone this property must be reversed and this court is required to surgically excise this carbuncle before it can infect the entire neighborhood.

M.J.L. Tendrich, J., dissents.
#### § 541.701 Customarily and regularly.

The phrase “customarily and regularly” means a frequency that must be greater than occasional but which, of course, may be less than constant. Tasks or work performed “customarily and regularly” includes work normally and recurrently performed every workweek; it does not include isolated or one-time tasks.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


                     5

<S>                             <C>
    9-mos
    DEC-31-2000
    JAN-01-2000
    SEP-30-2000
    7
    0
    0
    0
    0
    7
    0
    0
    19
    27
    0
    0
    0
    4
    (81)
    19
    15
    15
    0
    0
    64
    0
    4
    (36)
    0
    (36)
    0
    0
    0
    36
    (.01)
    (.01)


</TABLE>
#### § 71.15 Training.

All DOL systems managers, disclosure officers, and employees with responsibilities under the Privacy Act shall periodically attend training offered by the Department on the Privacy Act.
[No. 49329-9-I.

Division One.

November 18, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Iosif Tamas, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 01-1-01148-7, Charles W. Mertel, J., entered September 14, 2001. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Kennedy, J., concurred in by Agid and Ellington, JJ.
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 91

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas Monica Brown, a medic serving in the 782nd Brigade Support Battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, was 

deployed to Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom; 

Whereas members of the United States Armed Forces were 

attacked by a roadside bomb in the eastern Paktia province in Afghanistan on April 25, 2007; 

Whereas Specialist Monica L. Brown, at age 19, ran through 

insurgent gunfire to save the lives of fellow wounded soldiers injured after the roadside bomb tore through their 

convoy of humvees; 

Whereas Monica Brown is 1 of 25,109 women currently serving in the Armed Forces in Afghanistan and Iraq, and 

1 of 350,000 women serving in the United States Army; 

Whereas Monica Brown is the first woman in Afghanistan 

and only the second female member of the Armed Forces 

since World War II to receive the Silver Star, the Nation’s third-highest medal for valor; and 

Whereas the thoughts and prayers of Congress and the people of the United States remain with the families of all 

the members of the Armed Forces who are fighting to ensure the Nation’s freedom and safety: Now, therefore, be 

it
2

•SCON 91 ES 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress—

3 (1) honors Monica L. Brown, a Specialist in the 

4 United States Army, who risked her life to save the 

5 lives of her fellow wounded soldiers while serving in 

6 the Global War on Terror in Afghanistan, and rec7 ognizes her for her bravery and heroism; 

8 (2) extends its deepest gratitude to Monica L. 

9 Brown and her family in Lake Jackson, Texas; and 

10 (3) pledges its continued support for the men 

11 and women of the United States Armed Forces. 

Passed the Senate June 18, 2008. 

Attest:

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 91

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring Army Specialist Monica L. Brown, of 

Armed Forces.for the men and women of the United States and her family, and pledging continuing support Lake Jackson, Texas, extending gratitude to her
#### The State v. McLaughlin, *Appellant.*

Under the present statute a defendant in a criminal case testifying in his own behalf, can be cross-examined only as to those matters referred to by him ir^j|je examination in chief.

*Appeal from Jackson Criminal*Court.—Hon. H. P. White, Judge.

Reversed.

*G. A. C. Rochester*and *C. J. Bower*for appellant.

*321
      *D. H. McIntyre,*Attorney General, for the State.

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case is reversed and the cause remanded, for error committed in allowing the prosecuting attorney to cross-examine defendant as to matters and crimes not testified to by him in his testimony in chief. R. S. 1879, § 1918; *State v. McGraw,*74 Mo. 573. Other alleged errors are not passed upon.
§ 520.406 What happens once I have submitted my request for authorization to pay messengers, learners, or apprentices subminimum wages? ( a ) All applications submitted for authorization to pay wages lower than those required by section 6(a) of the FLSA will be considered and acted upon (issued or denied) subject to the conditions specified in §§ 520.403 and 520.404 of this part.
( b ) If, in the case of messengers and/or learners, available information indicates that the requirements of this part are satisfied, the Administrator shall issue a special certificate which will be mailed to the employer. If a special certificate is denied, the employer shall be given written notice of the denial. If a messenger and/or learner certificate is denied, notice of such denial shall be without prejudice to the filing of any subsequent application.
( c ) If, in the case of apprentices, the apprenticeship agreement and other available information indicate that the requirements of this part are satisfied, the Administrator shall issue a special certificate. The special certificate, if issued, shall be mailed to the employer or the apprenticeship committee and a copy shall be mailed to the apprentice. If a special certificate is denied, the employer or the apprenticeship committee, the apprentice and the recognized apprenticeship agency shall be given written notice of the denial. The employer shall pay the apprentice the minimum wage applicable under section 6(a) of the FLSA from the date of receipt of notice of such denial.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 238 

Amending Senate Resolution 458 (98th Congress) to allow the Secretary 

of the Senate to adjust the salaries of employees who are placed on 

the payroll of the Senate, under the direction of the Secretary, as 

a result of the death or resignation of a Senator. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2007 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. REID) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Amending Senate Resolution 458 (98th Congress) to allow 

the Secretary of the Senate to adjust the salaries of 

employees who are placed on the payroll of the Senate, 

under the direction of the Secretary, as a result of the 

death or resignation of a Senator. 

1 Resolved, That (a) subsection (a)(1) of the first sec2 tion of Senate Resolution 458 (98th Congress) is amended 

3 by inserting after ‘‘respective salaries’’ the following: ‘‘, 

4 unless adjusted by the Secretary of the Senate with the 

5 approval of the Senate Committee on Rules and Adminis6 tration,’’. 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 238 ATS 

1 (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take 

2 effect January 1, 2007. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
#### § 511.16 Reports.

Promptly after receipt of submissions under § 511.15, the committee or subcommittee will resolve the issues before it and prepare a report containing its findings of fact and recommendations. The report shall contain the committee's or the subcommittee's findings and conclusions as well as the reasons or basis therefor upon all the material issues of fact, law, or discretion presented on the record. When a committee, acting through a quorum, has presided at the reception of evidence, this report shall be its final report on the matters referred to it. Where, however, a subcommittee has presided at the reception of evidence, this report shall be an initial report, and the committee shall meet thereafter to review the report and rule on exceptions in its final report. Where the committee presides at the reception of evidence and proceeds to final decision, every party shall be regarded as having objected to any wage rate or classification at variance with any the party proposed in the party's prehearing statements unless the party accepted such a rate or classification in any submittal made pursuant to § 511.15. A copy of the report shall be signed by each member of the committee who approves it, either at a meeting of the committee or by circulation of one or more copies among the members of the committee. At any time within 3 days after the committee report is signed by those who approve it, members dissenting therefrom may collectively or individually submit signed reports stating the reasons for their dissent.

[55 FR 53299, Dec. 28, 1990]
Docket Number FAA-2013-0865
EXHIBIT 23.2



[MOORE STEPHENS POTTER LLP LETTERHEAD ]





                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation in the Form 10-K of Lincoln International
Corporation  of our report dated October 25, 2002,  relating to the audit of the
balance sheet of Lincoln  International  Corporation as of July 31, 2002 and the
related statements of operations,  shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the two years in the period ended July 31, 2002.



                                Moore Stephens Potter, LLP
                                (fka: Potter & Company, LLP)


                                /s/ MOORE STEPHENS POTTER LLP
                                ________________________________________

                                Consenting Date of March 26, 2004 for
                                report issued and dated October 25, 2002
PROMISSORY NOTE



$18,000.00                                                       April 28, 1998


        The undersigned, Navis Technologies, LTD ("Payor"), promises to pay to
John R. Varsames ("Payee") or order the principal sum of eighteen thousand and
00/100 DOLLARS ($18,000.00) with interest accruing on the unpaid principal
balance at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum, the entire principal
balance plus accrued interest being due and payable on demand.

        Such payment(s) shall be made at Payee's residence located at
Burlington, Vermont, or at such other place as the Payee hereof may designate in
writing, and such payments and any other sum due hereunder shall be made in
lawful money of the United States of America.

        This Note may be prepaid without penalty.

        In the case of default, the Payor agrees to pay the reasonable cost of
collection, including reasonable attorneys' fees.

        Every maker, guarantor and endorser waives presentment, demand, protest,
and notice and agrees that the time of payment may be extended without notice or
previous consent.

                                                 Navis Technologies, LTD




ATTEST:    /S/                                   By:  /S/
       ---------------------------                  ---------------------------
       Peter M. Doremus, Secretary                  John R. Varsames, President




Paid in Full

Date:      4/9/99
     -------------------------

Signature:  /S/
          --------------------