alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48800-48801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20087]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


White Pine-Nye Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The White Pine-Nye Resource Advisory Committee meeting 
scheduled in Eureka, Nevada has been cancelled. The committee is 
authorized under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-
Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-343) (the Act) and operates in 
compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The purpose of the 
committee is to improve collaborative relationships and to provide 
advice and recommendations to the Forest Service concerning projects 
and funding consistent with the title II of the Act.

[[Page 48801]]


DATES: The cancelled meeting was scheduled to be held August 8, 2011, 9 
a.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Williams, RAC Designated 
Federal Official, Austin Ranger District, 100 Midas Canyon Road, P.O. 
Box 130, Austin, Nevada 89310, 775-964-2671, e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cab9bda3a6a6a3aba7b9fafb8aacb9e4acafaee4bfb9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93e0e4fafffffaf2fee0a3a2d3f5e0bdf5f6f7bde6e0">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 2, 2011.
JoEllen J. Keil,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011-20087 Filed 8-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT
31.2













CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Beth
B. Pulley, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of North American
Galvanizing & Coatings, Inc.; and




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this annual report.




/s/ Beth B. Pulley


Beth B.
Pulley


Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer




April 30,
2010
PUBLIC LAW 115–205—JULY 23, 2018 132 STAT. 1533 

Public Law 115–205 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric project involving Jennings Randolph Dam. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT AND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT 

INVOLVING JENNINGS RANDOLPH DAM. 

(a) EXTENSION OF TIME.—Notwithstanding the time period 

specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) 

that would otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission project numbered 12715 (referred to in this section 

as the ‘‘project’’), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

(referred to in this section as the ‘‘Commission’’) may, at the request 

of the licensee for the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of, and the procedures of the Commission under, that section, 

extend the time period during which the licensee is required to 

commence the construction of the project for not more than 3 

consecutive 2-year periods that begin on the date of the expiration 

of the extension originally issued by the Commission. 

(b) OBLIGATION OF LICENSEE.—Any obligation of the licensee 

for the project for the payment of annual charges under section 

10(e) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 803(e)) shall commence 

on the expiration of the time period to commence construction 

of the project, as extended by the Commission under subsection 

(a). 

(c) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—If the period required for the commencement of construction of the project has expired before the date 

of enactment of this Act, the Commission may reinstate the 

license effective as of the date of the expiration of the license. 

Effective dates. 

July 23, 2018 

[H.R. 2122] 


ralbany on LAP520R082 with PUB LAWS PDF
132 STAT. 1534 PUBLIC LAW 115–205—JULY 23, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2122 (S. 710): 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115–175 (Comm. on Energy and Commerce). 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 115–103 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources) accompanying S. 710. 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 163 (2017): June 12, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 164 (2018): June 28, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

(2) EXTENSION.—If the Commission reinstates the license 

under paragraph (1), the first extension authorized under subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the expiration of 

the license. 

Approved July 23, 2018. 


ralbany on LAP520R082 with PUB LAWS PDF
Exhibit 4.3




 


 





Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated April 21, 2015, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-202304) of Smart Trust, Tax-Advantaged
Growth & Income Trust, Series 7.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


April 21, 2015
TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT: 

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM 

FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND 

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT:
 

RESIDENTIAL DISHWASHERS, DEHUMIDIFIERS, AND COOKING 

PRODUCTS, AND COMMERCIAL CLOTHES WASHERS 

December 2009 

U.S. Department of Energy 

Assistant Secretary 

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 

Building Technologies Program 

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards 

Washington, DC 20585 

EERE-2006-STD-0127 COMMENT 69.1
This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy 

and by staff members of 

Navigant Consulting, Inc. 

and 

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
 

EERE-2006-STD-0127 COMMENT 69.1
#### § 459.1 Computation of time for filing papers.

In computing any period of time prescribed by or allowed by the regulations contained in part 458 of this subchapter, the day of the act, event, or default after which the designated period of time begins to run, shall not be included. The last day of the period so computed is to be included unless it is a Saturday, Sunday or Federal legal holiday in which event the period shall run until the end of the next day which is neither a Saturday, Sunday, or a Federal legal holiday. When the period of time prescribed or allowed is seven (7) days or less, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal legal holidays shall be excluded from the computations. When these regulations require the filing of any paper, such document must be received by the Director or the officer or agent designated to receive such matter before the close of business of the last day of the time limit, if any, for such filing or extension of time that may have been granted.

[45 FR 15165, Mar. 7, 1980. Redesignated at 50 FR 31311, Aug. 1, 1985, as amended at 78 FR 8027, Feb. 5, 2012]
#### § 510.23 Agricultural activities eligible for minimum wage phase-in.

Agriculture activities eligible for an extended phase-in of the minimum wage in Major groups 01, 02, and 07 have been incorporated into Appendix B—Nonmanufacturing Industries Eligible for Minimum Wage Phase-In. Applicable wage rates are effective retroactive to April 1, 1990. Employers in the sugarcane farming industry (SIC Number 0133) who are subject to Tier 3 wage rates but who have paid wage rates based on Tier 2 wage rates may not take any action to recoup such payments where those actions would have the effect of reducing the wage rate being paid at the time of such recoupment to below that required under Tier 3.

[55 FR 53247, Dec. 27, 1990]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 49458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20236]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


TRICARE, Formerly Known as the Civilian Health and Medical 
Program of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS); Fiscal Year 2012 Continued 
Health Care Benefit Program Premium Update

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Updated Continued Health Care Benefit Program 
Premiums for Fiscal Year 2012.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice provides the updated Continued Health Care Benefit 
Program premiums for Fiscal Year 2012. CHCBP is a premium-based health 
care program that offers transitional health coverage after TRICARE 
eligibility ends. CHCBP benefits are comparable to TRICARE Standard 
with similar benefits, providers, and program rules.

DATES: Effective Date: The Fiscal Year 2012 rates contained in this 
notice are effective for services on or after October 1, 2011.

ADDRESSES: TRICARE Management Activity (TMA), Policy and Benefits 
Branch, 5111 Leesburg Pike, Suite 810A, Falls Church, VA 22041.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark A. Ellis, telephone (703) 681-
0039.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The final rule published in the Federal 
Register on September 30, 1994, (59 FR 49818) set forth rules to 
implement the Continued Health Care Benefit Program (CHCBP) required by 
10 United States Code Sec.  1078a. CHCBP is a premium-based health care 
program that offers transitional health coverage after TRICARE 
eligibility ends. CHCBP benefits are comparable to TRICARE Standard 
with similar benefits, providers, and program rules. Included in this 
final rule were provisions for updating the CHCBP premiums for each 
federal Fiscal Year. As stated in the final rule, the premiums are 
based on Federal Employee Health Benefit Program employee and agency 
contributions required for a comparable health benefits plan, plus an 
administrative fee. Premiums may be revised annually and shall be 
published annually for each Fiscal Year.
    The TRICARE Management Activity has updated the quarterly premiums 
for Fiscal Year 2012 as shown below.

Quarterly CHCBP Premiums for Fiscal Year 2012

    Individual--$1,065.
    Family--$2,390.
    The above premiums are effective for services rendered on or after 
October 1, 2011.

    Dated: July 8, 2011.
Patricia Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-20236 Filed 8-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC. (REGISTRANT)
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James A. Wylie, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify to
the best of my knowledge and belief pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006,
which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Registrant.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter
63 title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.


Date: November 13, 2006                 /s/ JAMES A. WYLIE, JR.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        James A. Wylie, Jr.
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer)
#### § 452.134 Preservation of records.

The credentials of delegates, and all minutes and other records pertaining to the election of officers at conventions, must be preserved for one year by the officials designated in the constitution and bylaws or by the secretary if no other officer is designated. This requirement applies not only to conventions of national or international labor organizations, but also to representative bodies of intermediate labor organizations.
#### Albert Prodell et al., Respondents, v State of New York, Defendant, and Town of Brookhaven, Appellant.

Submitted September 18, 1995;

decided September 21, 1995

Appeal transferred, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, *sua sponte,*to the Appellate Division, Third Department, upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie when questions *832other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, §3 [b] [2]; § 5 [b]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]).
**EXHIBIT 11**

 

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OFEARNINGS PER SHARE

 

INCOME PER SHARE

 

Computation of income pershare

(in thousands, exceptper share data)

 
| ** **                                                                                                   | ** ** | **Three months ended  September 30,** | ** ** | **Nine months ended  September 30,** | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                                                                   | ** ** | **2005**                                   | ** ** | **2004**                                  | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** |
|                                                                                                         |       |                                       |       |                                      |       |   |   |   |   |
| Net income                                                                                                   |       | $                                          | 2,225      |                                      | $          | 1,139 |   | $ | 633 |   | $ | 359 |   |
| Weighted average shares of common stock  outstanding                                                         |       | 72,372                                     |       | 70,833                                    |       | 72,142 |   | 62,776 |   |
| Weighted average shares of common stock  held for former Women.com stockholders not yet tendered             |       | 53                                         |       | 56                                        |       | 53 |   | 56 |   |
| Weighted average shares of common stock  held for former Promotions.com stockholders not yet tendered        |       | 2                                          |       | 2                                         |       | 2 |   | 2 |   |
| Adjusted weighted average shares of common  stock outstanding used in computing basic net income per share   |       | 72,427                                     |       | 70,891                                    |       | 72,197 |   | 62,834 |   |
| Adjusted weighted average shares of common  stock outstanding used in computing diluted net income per share |       | 76,586                                     |       | 75,230                                    |       | 76,346 |   | 67,902 |   |
| Basic and diluted net income per share –  pro forma                                                     |       | $                                          | 0.03       |                                      | $          | 0.02 |   | $ | 0.01 |   | $ | 0.01 |   |

 

----
SERVED: DECEMBER 15, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MARY WOOTEN 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09EA0010 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2009-0077 

APARTMENT OF 

•Ai^SPORWION 

.A^cT OPERAriO^{S 

m 'iT lb A S:35 

ORDER OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

CORRECTING TRANSCRIPT 

The following corrections are hereby made in the transcript of the Prehearing 

Telephone Conference held November 19, 2010: 

PAGE LINE READS SHOULD READ 

3 

15 

22 

25 

28 

33 

33 

34 

36 

37 

38 

5 

23 

5 

7 

4 

8 

22 

14 

6 

10,18 

3 

matter 

left 

it can 

If you're trying to convince me. 

there's always 

Liability 

matter 

interfere 

matter . . . matter 

Judge Bankhead 

Pardon me, 

Matter 

right 

intent 

It strikes me. 

that's going to raise 

Level of penalty 

Matter 

interfered 

Matter .. . Matter 

Judge Benkin 

I'm talking to 
-mmmmmmim 

1 

40 16 

41 8 

42 11 

SO ORDERED. 

that in 

amount 

solving 

penalty 

'^ISO ^7"—-<.\v_yL'y ' 

"Rl^mie A. Yoder y ^ 

Chief Administrative La>/Ju^ge 

at 

amount of penalty 

settling 

Attachment-Service List 

y 
FAA Docket No. CP09EA00I0 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Robert H. Waldman, Respondent's Counsel 

113 Ridgley Ave. 

Annapolis, MD 21401 

TEL: 410-268-5050 

FAX: 410-269-1544 

Mary Wooten, Respondent 

3851 Old Solomons Island Road 

Harwood, MD 20776 

Christian L. Lewerenz, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, EAL-7 

Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3273 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable Roimie A. Yoder, Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room E12-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-3-
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 0 72 4 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 9 9 - CE - 1 3 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list l atest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
#### § 5.22 Effect of the Davis-Bacon fringe benefits provisions.

The Davis-Bacon Act and the prevailing wage provisions of the statutes referenced in § 1.1 of this subtitle confer upon the Secretary of Labor the authority to predetermine, as minimum wages, those wage rates found to be prevailing for corresponding classes of laborers and mechanics employed on projects of a character similar to the contract work in the area in which the work is to be performed. See the definitions of the terms “prevailing wage” and “area” in § 1.2 of this subtitle. The fringe benefits amendments enlarge the scope of this authority by including certain bona fide fringe benefits within the meaning of the terms “wages”, “scale of wages”, “wage rates”, “minimum wages”, and “prevailing wages”, as used in the Davis-Bacon Act.

[88 FR 57744, Aug. 23, 2023]
#### § 570.116 Separate applicability.

There are situations where section 12(c) does not apply because the minor himself is not considered employed in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce. This does not exclude the possibility of coverage under the provisions of section 12(a), however. In those cases where oppressive child labor is employed in commerce but not in or about a producing establishment, coverage exists under section 12(c) but not under the provisions of section 12(a). The employment of telegraph messengers under 16 years of age would normally involve this type of situation.[27] There may also be cases where oppressive child labor is employed in occupations closely related and directly essential to the production of goods in a separate establishment and therefore covered by section 12(c) but due to the fact that none of the goods produced in the establishment where the minors work are ever shipped or delivered for shipment in commerce either in the same form or as a part or ingredient of other goods, coverage of section 12(a) is lacking. An illustration of this type of situation would be the employment of a minor under the applicable age minimum in a plant engaged in the production of electricity which is sold and consumed exclusively within the same State and some of which is used by establishments in the production of goods for commerce.

[36 FR 25157, Dec. 29, 1971]

###### Footnotes -
  570.116

[27] In “Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Lenroot,” 323 U.S. 490, the court held section 12(a) inapplicable to Western Union on the grounds that the company does not “produce” or “ship” goods within the meaning of that subsection.