alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(78 South. 410)

#### BICE v. STATE.

(3 Div. 294.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 2, 1918.)

Criminal Law <&wkey;252(3) — Complaint—Sufficiency.

A complaint charging that X B. did in the opinion of complainant commit on him the offense assault and battery with a deadly weapon, knucks, was wholly insufficient to sustain a judgment of conviction, or further proceedings against defendant.

Appeal from. Circuit Court, Autauga County; Gaston Gunter, Judge.

Jack Bice was prosecuted for assault and battery with a deadly weapon, and appeals from the conviction.

Reversed and rendered.

C. E. O. Timmerman, of Prattville, for appellant. F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., and David W. W. Fuller, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

BROWN, P. J.

The only complaint appearing in the record to sustain the judgment of conviction, omitting the caption, signature, and jurat of the officer, is in these words:

> “Before me, W. A. Rawlinson, N. P. and Ex-Offi. J. P., a justice of the peace in and for said county, personally appeared Paul A. Tatum, who being duly sworn, deposes and says, on oath, that in said county on or about 3d day of February, 1917, one Jack Bice did in Ms opinion commit on him the offense assault and battery with a deadly weapon, knucks, against the peace and dignity of the state of Alabama.”

*417This is wholly insufficient to sustain the judgment of conviction, or further proceedings against the defendant. Butler v. State, 130 Ala. 127, 30 South. 338; Sherrod v. State, 34 Ala. App. 57, 71 South. 76.

The judgment appealed from is reversed, and one here rendered discharging the defendant.

Reversed and rendered.
Exhibit 15











Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.  20549



Commissioners:



We are aware that our report dated October 26, 2006 on our review of interim financial statements of LCNB Corp. and Subsidiaries (the "Company"), as of and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 and included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended, is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-8, filed on March 13, 2003.  Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.







/s/ J.D. Cloud & Co. L.L.P.



J.D. Cloud & Co. L.L.P.





Cincinnati, Ohio

October 26, 2006
#### ROGERS ELECTRIC LABORATORIES CO v WALLICK, etc. et

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 10862.

Decided Oct. 13, 1930

Ven Svarc and W. H. Miller, both of Cleveland, for Laboratories Co.

C. Butler and C. F. Franks, both of Cleveland, for Wallick, et.

Judges JUSTICE and CROW (3rd pist) and MAUCK (4th Dist) sitting

MAUCK, J.

Earle W. Wallick, trustee for the members of a partnership of which he was one, brought his action in the Municipal Court against the Laboratories Company for services rendered. In the progress of the case the trial court permitted an amendment to be made by adding the members of the partnership as parties plaintiff. This was objected to by the defendant below on the ground that Wallick, the trustee, had no interest in the subject matter of the action, and that there was, therefore, no case to be amended, and that the substitution *671of other plaintiffs for him was unauthorized by law. The contention of the defendant was overruled in the Municipal Court, and that forms the principal ground upon which reversal is sought in this court.

Plaintiff in Error has cited us to page ninety-nine of Bates Pleading and Practice, but the citation is not in point. That portion of the author’s text relates to joinder of defendants. The pertinent provisions in the book referred to will be found op page 135 and following, and on that authority and L. S. and M. S. Ry Co. vs. City of Elyria, 69 Oh St 414 and Van Camp vs. McCully, 89 Oh St 1, the contention of the plaintiff in error is denied.

The conclusion is reached thát the Municipal Court was acting within its powers in permitting the amendment to be made.'

The judgment was sustained by sufficient evidence. There are no other questions in the case to justify a discussion.

Judgment affirmed.

Justice and Crow, JJ., concur.
Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002

RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE IN CIVIL CASES

(Secretary to complete entire top portion at time opinion is delivered – have signed by authoring judge)

CASE NO.: 14-11-00976-CV; 14-11-00980-CV

DATE CASE FILED: 11/4/2011 

STYLE: Heritage Gulf Coast Properties, Ltd. and Sumer S. Pinglia v. 

Sandalwood Apartments, Inc., Jaikishin S. Bhagia, Nanik S. Bhagia, and 

Woodbridge Properties, LLC.

COUNTY: Harris

DESCRIPTION/SUBJECT OF CASE: Contract

PANEL: WJB, JD, RS

AUTHOR: Donovan 

PER CURIAM: NO

OPINION ISSUED: September 24, 2013

OPINION DECISION: AFFIRMED

RECOMMEND: DESTROY: YES HISTORICAL: NO

COMMENTS: 

SIGNED: 

DATE: ___________________________

–––––––––––––––––––––**FOR CLERK’S USE ONLY**––––––––––––––––––

MANDATE ISSUED: ___________________________________________________

LETTER TO STATE ARCHIVES (date): __________________________________

COMMENTS: ________________________________________________________

–––––––––––––––––––––**FOR CLERK’S USE ONLY**––––––––––––––––––

(Dispose of 6 years after final disposition)

DATE DESTROYED: _____________________________________________

DATE SENT TO STATE ARCHIVES FOR PERMANENT RETENTION:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 5 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 5

  Honoring the life of Percy Lavon Julian, a pioneer in the field of 
organic chemistry and the first and only African-American chemist to be 
            inducted into the National Academy of Sciences.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 31, 2007

Mr. Obama (for himself, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Lugar, Mr. Lieberman, 
and Mr. Bayh) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Honoring the life of Percy Lavon Julian, a pioneer in the field of 
organic chemistry and the first and only African-American chemist to be 
            inducted into the National Academy of Sciences.

Whereas Percy Julian was born on April 11, 1899 in Montgomery, Alabama, the son 
        of a railway clerk and the first member of his family to attend college;
Whereas Percy Julian graduated from DePauw University in 1920 and received an 
        M.S. degree from Harvard University in 1923 and a Ph.D. from the 
        University of Vienna in 1931;
Whereas, in 1935, Dr. Julian became the first to discover a process to 
        synthesize physostigmine, the drug used in the treatment of glaucoma;
Whereas Dr. Julian later pioneered a commercial process to synthesize cortisone 
        from soy beans, enabling the widespread use of cortisone as an 
        affordable treatment for arthritis;
Whereas Dr. Julian was the first African-American chemist elected to the 
        National Academy of Sciences in 1973 for his lifetime of scientific 
        accomplishments, held over 130 patents at the time of his death in 1975, 
        and dedicated much of his life to the advancement of African Americans 
        in the sciences; and
Whereas Dr. Julian's life story has been documented in the Public Broadcasting 
        Service NOVA film ``Forgotten Genius'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Congress honors the life of Percy Lavon Julian, a pioneer in 
the field of organic chemistry and the first and only African-American 
chemist to be inducted into the National Academy of Sciences.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 48801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20209]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Central Idaho Resource Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 110-343), the Salmon-Challis 
National Forest's Central Idaho Resource Advisory Committee will 
conduct a business meeting which is open to the public.

DATES: Tuesday, August 30, 2011, beginning at 10:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Salmon-Challis N.F. South Zone Office, Highway 93, Challis, 
Idaho.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda topics will include, presentation of 
proposed projects, evaluation of projects proposals, and approval and 
recommendation of some projects for Title II funding for 2012. Some RAC 
members may attend the meeting by conference call, telephone, or 
electronically.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Guzman, Forest Supervisor, at 
208-756-5111.

    August 2, 2011.
Frank V. Guzman,
Forest Supervisor and Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-20209 Filed 8-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

We have  audited  the  accompanying  balance  sheets of  Mammoth  MiningCompany  (development  stage  company) at September  30, 2001 and  September 30,2000, and the statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows forthe years ended  September 30, 2001 and 2000, and the period July 17, 1998 (dateof  inception of  development  stage) to September  30,  2001.  These  financialstatements   are  the   responsibility   of  the   Company's   management.   Ourresponsibility  is to express an opinion on these financial  statements based onour audits.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael J.
Culotta, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 26, 2004

                                            /s/ Michael J. Culotta
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                Michael J. Culotta
                                                Chief Financial Officer
#### § 779.118 Employees providing central services for multi-unit organizations.

Employees providing central services for a multiunit organization may be engaged both “in commerce” and “in the production of goods for commerce” within the meaning of the Act. For example, employees engaged in work relating to the coordinated purchasing, warehousing and distribution (and in the administrative and clerical work relating to such activities) for various retail units of a chain are covered under the Act. (See *Phillips Co.* v. *Walling,* 324 U.S. 490; *Walling* v. *Jacksonville Paper Co.,* 317 U.S. 564, affirming, 128 F. 2d 935 (CA-5); *Mitchell* v. *C. & P. Stores,* 286 F. 2d 109 (CA-5); *Mitchell* v. *E. G. Shinner & Co.,* Inc., 221 F. 2d 260 (CA-7); *Donovan* v. *Shell Oil Co.,* 168 F. 2d 776 (CA-8).) In addition, employees who regularly and recurrently correspond and maintain records of activities of out-of-State stores and such employees as traveling auditors, inventory men, window display men, etc., who regularly travel from State to State in the performance of their duties are covered under the Act. (See *Mitchell* v. *Kroger Co.,* 248 F. 2d 935 (CA-8).)
Opinion issued December 19 , 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 23
- 00132
- CV

——————————— RACHEL LEWIS , Appella nt

V. RGRAU PROPERTIES, LLC , Appell e e
On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No . 4

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1197320

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant’s brief was due to be filed on September 5, 2023. On September 22, 2023, the Court issued a notice that the appeal might be dismissed unless appellant filed a brief or a motion for extension within 10 days of the date of the notice. Appellant did not respond or file a brief or motion for extension.2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 42.3. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Guerra.
#### § 452.35 Qualifications for candidacy.

It is recognized that labor organizations may have a legitimate institutional interest in prescribing minimum standards for candidacy and officeholding in the organization. On the other hand, a dominant purpose of the Act is to ensure the right of members to participate fully in governing their union and to make its officers responsive to the members. A basic assumption underlying the concept of “free and democratic elections,” is that voters will exercise common sense and good judgment in casting their ballots. In union elections as in political elections, the good judgment of the members in casting their votes should be the primary determinant of whether a candidate is qualified to hold office. Therefore, restrictions placed on the right of members to be candidates must be closely scrutinized to determine whether they serve union purposes of such importance, in terms of protecting the union as an institution, as to justify subordinating the right of the individual member to seek office and the interest of the membership in a free, democratic choice of leaders.
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3655 — CERBERUS/PEGUFORM)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2004/C 288/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)  Available on DG COMP website:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

----
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4588

_____________________________

ROBERT BRYAN LUKE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Steven B. Whittington, Judge.

November 19, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Robert Bryan Luke, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
----

----

----

----

I Teave

Komisjon

----

Euro vahetuskurss (1)

10. november 2004

(2004/C 276/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Allikas: EKP avaldatud viitekurss.

----

----

Teatavate dumpinguvastaste meetmete eelseisva aegumise teade

(2004/C 276/02)

2.   Menetlus

Ühenduse tootjad võivad esitada läbivaatamise algatamiseks kirjaliku taotluse. Kõnealune taotlus peab sisaldama piisavalt tõendeid selle kohta, et meetmete aegumise tagajärjel jätkuks või korduks tõenäoliselt dumping ja kahju tekitamine.

Kui komisjon otsustab asjaomased meetmed läbi vaadata, antakse importijatele, eksportijatele, eksportivate riikide esindajatele ja ühenduse tootjatele seejärel võimalus läbivaatamistaotluses esitatud küsimusi avardada, tagasi lükata või nende kohta arvamust avaldada.

3.   Tähtaeg

Eelneva alusel võivad ühenduse tootjad esitada alates käesoleva teatise avaldamise kuupäevast, kuid mitte hiljem kui kolm kuud enne alljärgnevas tabelis osutatud kuupäeva, kirjaliku läbivaatamistaotluse aadressil: Euroopa Komisjon, kaubanduse peadirektoraat (talitus B-1), J-79 5/16, B-1049 Brüssel (2).

----

(1)EÜT L 56, 6.3.1996, lk 1. Määrust on viimati muudetud nõukogu määrusega (EÜ) nr 461/2004 (ELT L 77, 13.3.2004, lk 12).

(2)  Teleks COMEU B 21877; faks: (32-2) 295 65 05.

----

----

1. november 2004 – EUR-Lex: uus versioon!

europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/

Uus sait ühendab CELEXi teenused ning võimaldab vaba ja mugavat juurdepääsu 20 keeles suurimale EL õiguse dokumentide andmebaasile.

----
§ 541.300 General rule for professional employees. ( a ) The term “employee employed in a bona fide professional capacity” in section 13(a)(1) of the Act shall mean any employee: ( 1 ) Compensated on a salary or fee basis at not less than the level set forth in § 541.600; and
( 2 ) Whose primary duty is the performance of work: ( i ) Requiring knowledge of an advanced type in a field of science or learning customarily acquired by a prolonged course of specialized intellectual instruction; or
( ii ) Requiring invention, imagination, originality or talent in a recognized field of artistic or creative endeavor.
( b ) The term “salary basis” is defined at § 541.602; “fee basis” is defined at § 541.605; “board, lodging or other facilities” is defined at § 541.606; and “primary duty” is defined at § 541.700.
[69 FR 22260, Apr. 23, 2004, as amended at 81 FR 32549, May 23, 2016; 84 FR 51306, Sept. 27, 2019; 89 32971, Apr. 26, 2024]
#### § 553.20 Introduction.

Section 7 of the FLSA requires that covered, nonexempt employees receive not less than one and one-half times their regular rates of pay for hours worked in excess of the applicable maximum hours standards. However, section 7(o) of the Act provides an element of flexibility to State and local government employers and an element of choice to their employees or the representatives of their employees regarding compensation for statutory overtime hours. The exemption provided by this subsection authorizes a public agency which is a State, a political subdivision of a State, or an interstate governmental agency, to provide compensatory time off (with certain limitations, as provided in § 553.21) in lieu of monetary overtime compensation that would otherwise be required under section 7. Compensatory time received by an employee in lieu of cash must be at the rate of not less than one and one-half hours of compensatory time for each hour of overtime work, just as the monetary rate for overtime is calculated at the rate of not less than one and one-half times the regular rate of pay.
. I 

SERVED:AUGUST 28,2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

ADDISON JET MANAGEMENT, INC. 

FAADOCKETNo. [TOBEASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Case) 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0205 

lOIZ 

. . 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DECISION IN PART 

AND LIMITING PROCEEDING TO ISSUE OF PENALTY 

'

10 A 0 ,; I - J• ' 1. 0 · I 

... 

.. 

., 

The Federal Aviation Aall}inistration ("Complainant") fi!ed a Motion fot'-'Decision 

("Motion") dated July 13, 2012, which, following the undersigned's Order to Show Cause of 

August 10, 2012 was addressed by Respondent Addison Jet Management, Inc. ("Respondent"). 

Respondent's answer of August 23,2012 acknowledges that it' committed each of the violations 

with which it has been charged. Respondent does, however, take issue with Complainant's 

additional request that its proposed civil penalty of $8,149 be adopted. 

Complainant's Motion for Decision is granted in part. I find that it is eittitied fo a' 

decision as to the substantive allegations. I find, however, that genuine issues· of material fact 

exist respecting the appropriate civil penalty amount and, as such, judgment on that question as a 

matter of law may not be granted. · · · 

WHEREFORE, it is ORDERED as follows: 

. - . 

•. 
.. 

I 

2 

) ~ 

1-Complainant's Motion for Decision is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. It 

is GRANTED as to the substantive allegations of the Complaint, and DENIED as to the 

issue of civil penalty; 

2 -The Order to Sho'Y C~use is VACATED; 

3 -The proceeding will be limited from this point forward to the issue of civil penalty. 

Attachment - Service List 

.. 

: . 

~ 

.. 

, 

• .• 4 

.. . . ' 

··.\ 

-~ .. 

. .. 
SERVJ[CE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 

ONE COPY 

Gerald P. Shaw, Director of Operations 

Addison Jet Management, Inc., Respondent 

7515 Lemmon A venue 

Dallas, TX 75209 

Autumn Killingham, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office ofthe ChiefCounsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-7728 

FAX: 202-267-5106 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S:E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0205 

(Civil Penalty Action). 

.. 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by ex:pedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591, Attention:· Hearing Docket Cleric,AGC-430.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 196 

Commending Idaho on winning the bid to host the 2009 Special Olympics 

World Winter Games. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2007 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself and Mr. CRAIG) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

RESOLUTION 

Commending Idaho on winning the bid to host the 2009 

Special Olympics World Winter Games. 

Whereas Special Olympics is an international nonprofit organization that promotes personal development through 

sports training and competition; 

Whereas Special Olympics advances the understanding of intellectual disabilities in the community and the Nation 

through participation and fellowship; 

Whereas Special Olympics serves more than 2,500,000 individuals with intellectual disabilities; 

Whereas Special Olympics offers more than 200 programs in 

over 160 countries; 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 196 IS 

Whereas Special Olympics offers 30 Olympic-type summer 

and winter sports to both children and adults with intellectual disabilities; 

Whereas Boise, Idaho won the international bid to host the 

2009 Special Olympics World Winter Games to be held 

February 6 through 13, 2009; 

Whereas thousands of athletes are expected to compete in the 

2009 Special Olympics World Winter Games; and 

Whereas the 2009 Special Olympics World Winter Games will 

be the largest multi-sport event ever held in the State of 

Idaho: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) applauds the goals and principles of Special 

3 Olympics; 

4 (2) salutes the athletes, coaches, family mem5 bers, friends, and volunteers that make Special 

6 Olympics possible; and 

7 (3) congratulates the State of Idaho on its se8 lection as the host for the 2009 Special Olympics 

9 World Winter Games. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS