alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### HAMPTON etc v INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist, Erie Co

No 328.

Decided June 30, 1930

John F. McCrystal, Sandusky, for Hampton.

Gilbert Bettman, Attorney General, R. R. Zurmehly, Special Counsel and C. E. Moyer,. Sandusky, for Commission.

WILLIAMS, J.

The law applicable to the case is established for us in Slanina vs. Industrial Commission, 117 Ohio St., 329. If the duties of the decedent exposed him to a special or peculiar danger from the tornado, greater than other persons in the community, the claim is one that is compensable.

There is evidence in the record tending to show that shortly prior to the collapse of the building, deceased and another employe of the company, George A. Bretz, had completed the loading of a truck, standing outside the building, with stucco, steel fabric and lumber; that the steel fabric had been obtained from the basement of fhe building and the stucco from the first floor; that after the loading was finished the two men were fixing the clutch and testing the fly-wheel on the truck; that just as the repair work was accomplished, the storm approached, and the men went inside; that they had barely gotten inside when the building collapsed; that at the time the building went down they were standing together' on the first floor among sacks of cement and stucco and boxes of asbestos shingles which were piled up in storage; and that when Hampton was taken out, these building supplies were piled on and about him, mixed with debris of the fallen building.

The jury might well draw the inference from the evidence adduced that deceased was killed by the building supplies which fell upon him, set in motion by the tornado, and that the danger of an employe being killed by the falling of materials stored by the employer, among piles of which he went in performing his duties as an employe, was one greater than other persons in the community were subjected to.

The court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant to the prejudice of plaintiff in error. Judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Lloyd and Richards, JJ, concur.
#### § 32.51 Rulings and interpretations.

Ruling under or interpretations of the Act and the regulations contained in this part 32 shall be made by the Assistant Secretary.
#### John P. Parsons, Respondent, Impleaded with Another, *v.*Liberty National Bank and Trust Company, Appellant.

Argued June 8, 1937;

decided July 13, 1937.

*524
      *William O. Robertson and Louis J. Felstiner*for appellant.

*Ernest J. Ellenwood*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. (See 275 N. Y. 543.)

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: O’Brien, J.
----

----

III Informações

Agência de Execução para a Energia Inteligente

----

CONVITE PARA APRESENTAÇÃO DE CANDIDATURAS

(2004/C 205 A/01)

A Agência de Execução de Energia Inteligente (IEEA) procura candidatos com vista a preencher certos postos. Informações detalhadas sobre estes postos, as missões da Agência e o procedimento a seguir para apresentação de candidaturas estão publicados no site web da IEEA no seguinte endereço: http://europa.eu.int/comm/energy/intelligent/index_en.html

----
UNITED STATES OF AME RICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTEC TION BOARD

MARCIA MOCNY, Appellant,

v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Agency. DOCKET NUMBER CH

- 831E

- 15

- 0295

- I

- 1

DATE: June 28, 2016

Matthew L. Edwards , Chicago, Illinois, for the appellant.
Delores A. Saunders , Washington, D.C., for the agency.

BEFORE
Susan Tsui Grundmann, Chairman Mark A. Robbins, Member

ORDER ¶1 The appellant has filed a petition for review of the initial decision
, which
affirmed the reconsideration decision of the Office of Personnel Management denying her application for disability retirement. The two Board members cannot agree on the disposition of the petition for review. Therefore, the initial decision now becomes the final decision of the Merit Systems Protecti on Board in this appeal. Title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 1200.3(b) ( 5 C.F.R. § 1 200.3 (b)). This decision shall not be considered as p recedent by the Board in any other case. 5 C.F.R. § 1200.3 (d)

.2

NOTICE TO THE APPELL ANT REGARDING YOUR FURTHER REVIEW RIGHTS You have the right to request review of the final decision by the U

. S

. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. You must submit your reques t to the court at the following address: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 717 Madison Place, N.W.

Washi ngton, DC 20439 The court must receive your requ est for review no later than 60 calendar days
after the date of this order. See 5 U.S.C. § 7703 (b)(1)(A) (as rev. eff. Dec. 27, 2012). If you ch oose to file, be very careful to file on time. The court has held that normally it does not have the authority to waive this statutory deadline and that filings that do not comply with the deadline must be dismissed. See Pinat v. Office of Personnel Mana gement , 931 F.2d 1544 (Fed. Cir. 1991). If you need further information about your right to appeal this decision to court, you should refer to the F ederal law that gives you this right. It is found in

t itle 5 of the United States Code, section 7703 ( 5 U.S.C. § 7703 ) (as rev. eff.
Dec. 27, 2012). You may read this law as well as othe r sections of the
United States Code, at our website, http://www.mspb.gov/appeals/uscode/htm

. Additional information is available at the court ’ s website, www.cafc.uscourts.gov . Of particular relevance is the court ’ s “ Guide for Pro Se Petitioners and Appellants, ” which is contained within the
court's Rul es of Practice , and Forms 5, 6, and 11. If you are interested in securing pro bono representation for an appeal to
the U

. S

. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, you may visit our website

at http://www.mspb.gov/probono for information regarding pro bono representation for Merit Systems Protection Board appellants before the Federal
Circuit. T he3

Merit Systems Protection Board neither endorses the services provided by any attorney nor warrants that any attorney will accept representation in a given case.

FOR THE BOARD:

Washington, D.C. ______________________________ Jennifer Everling Acting Clerk of the Board
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

September 1 6 , 2014

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00450

- CV

DOV AVNI KAMINETZKY AKA DOV K. AVNI , Appellant

V.
DOSOHS I, LTD , Appellee

On Appeal from the 125th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 53721

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment signed March 7, 2014 . On July 17, 2014 , appell ee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.
The record reflects appellant filed a motion on April 7, 2014. The substance of the motion, however, does not seek to alter the final summary judgment signed March 7, 2014. The notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the2

judgment is signed when appellant has not filed a post

- judgment motion seeking to alter the trial court’s judgment. 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1.
Appellant ’ s notice of appeal was untimely filed on June 5, 2014. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1, but within the
fifteen

- day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of
time. See Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617

- 18 (1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). Appellant ’ s notice of appeal was not filed within the
fifteen

- day period provided by Rule 26.3

. Appellant has filed no r esponse to appellee’s motion t o dismiss that
demonstrate s this Court has jurisd iction to entertain the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices McCally, Brown and Wise.

1 Appellant’s request for findings of fact and conclusions of law filed March 17, 2014, does not operate to extend the appellate timetable in this context.
§ 37.55 When must the Governor carry out his or her obligations with regard to the Methods of Administration? ( a ) Within 180 days of either the date on which this interim final rule is effective, or the date on which the Department gives final approval to a State's Five-Year Plan, whichever is later, a Governor must: ( 1 ) Develop and implement a Methods of Administration consistent with the requirements of this part, and
( 2 ) Submit a copy of the Methods of Administration to the Director.
( b ) The Governor must promptly update the Methods of Administration whenever necessary, and must notify the Director in writing at the time that any such updates are made.
( c ) Every two years from the date on which the initial MOA is submitted to the Director under § 37.55(a)(2), the Governor must review the Methods of Administration and the manner in which it has been implemented, and determine whether any changes are necessary in order for the State to comply fully and effectively with the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIA and this part. ( 1 ) If any such changes are necessary, the Governor must make the appropriate changes and submit them, in writing, to the Director.
( 2 ) If the Governor determines that no such changes are necessary, s/he must certify, in writing, to the Director that the Methods of Administration previously submitted continues in effect.
Exhibit  99.4


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of Visualant, Incorporated on Form
10-QSB  for  the  period  ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mary Hethey, Chief
Financial  Officer  and Secretary Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge  and  belief:

     (1)  the  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.


                                         "Mary Hethey"
                           ----------------------------------------------
                                          Mary  Hethey
                            Chief  Financial  Officer,  Chief  Accounting
                              Officer  and Secretary  Treasurer

Date:  July  28,  2005
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα C 205A/13 Α

| | ISSN 1725-2415 |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 205A |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες | 47ό έτος13 Αυγούστου 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2415

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 205A

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες

47ό έτος13 Αυγούστου 2004

---

| Ανακοίνωση αριθ | Περιεχόμενα | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Πληροφορίες |
| | Εκτελεστικός Οργανισμός για την Ευφυή Ενέργεια |
| 2004/C 205A/1 | Πρόσκληση υποψηφιοτήτων | 1 |

Ανακοίνωση αριθ

Περιεχόμενα

Σελίδα

III   Πληροφορίες

Εκτελεστικός Οργανισμός για την Ευφυή Ενέργεια

2004/C 205A/1

Πρόσκληση υποψηφιοτήτων

1

| EL | |
| --- | --- |

EL

---

III Πληροφορίες

Εκτελεστικός Οργανισμός για την Ευφυή Ενέργεια

| 13.8.2004 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | CA 205/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2004

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

CA 205/1

---

ΠΡΌΣΚΛΗΣΗ ΥΠΟΨΉΦΙΟΤΗΤΩΝ

(2004/C 205 A/01)

Ο Εκτελεστικός Οργανισμός για την Ευφυή Ενέργεια αναζητά υποψηφίους για την κάλυψη συγκεκριμένων θέσεων. Λεπτομερείς πληροφορίες σχετικά με αυτές τις θέσεις, την αποστολή του οργανισμού και τη διαδικασία υποβολής αιτήσεων μπορείτε να βρείτε στην ιστοσελίδα του οργανισμού στην παρακάτω διεύθυνση: http://europa.eu.int/comm/energy/intelligent/index_en.html.

---
Editorial Note on Part 7
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 7 appear at 61 FR 19985, May 3, 1996.

§ 7.9 Review of decisions in other proceedings. ( a ) Any party or aggrieved person shall have a right to file a petition for review with the Board within a reasonable time from any final decision in any agency action under part 1, 3, or 5 of this subtitle.
( b ) The petition shall state concisely the points relied upon, and shall be accompanied by a statement setting forth supporting reasons. Further, the petition shall indicate whether or not the petitioner consents to the disposition of the questions involved by a single member.
( c ) A copy of the presentation shall be served upon the officer who issued the decision, and upon any other party or known interested person, as the case may be. In representing the officer who issued the final decision in any agency action under parts 1, 3, or 5 of the subtitle, the Solicitor shall, among other things, file promptly with the Board a record supporting the officer's decision, including any findings upon which the decision is based, after receipt of service of the petition.
( d ) In representing the officer issuing a final decision in any agency action under parts 1, 3, and 5 of this subtitle, the Solicitor shall file with the Board a statement of the position of the officer who issued the final decision at issue, concerning the decision challenged; and shall make service on the petitioner and any other interested persons.
( e ) The Board shall afford any other parties or known interested persons a reasonable opportunity to respond to the petition. Copies of any such response shall be served upon the officer issuing the decision below and upon the petitioner.
( f ) The Board shall pass upon the points raised in the petition upon the basis of the entire record before it, and shall notify the parties to the proceeding of its decision. In any remand of a case as provided in § 7.1(e), the Board shall include any appropriate instructions.
[36 FR 10863, June 4, 1971, as amended at 86 FR 1780, Jan. 11, 2021]
08/13/201 0 15;0 5 FAX 202493514 2 FA A + DM S glOOI/OO S

Brian WaJlaes a 1127 2 WorthamCres t

Circl e Manassas , VA 2010 9 Jul y 13 , 201 0 Hearin g Docke t

Cler k AGC-43 0 Ji mConnecl y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suite 2W100 0 Washington , B.C . 2059 1 

### -'U L 1 4 201 0 "tAHIM G DOCKE T 

# ^my)<^m,JAblb'lxx< ^
T o th e Federal Aviatio n Administration : A s i n accordanc e wit

h 1 4 CF.R . § 13.16 1 a

mrequestin g ahearin g for m y Cas e No , 2010WP190018 . Thi s i s m y chose n cours e of

actio n a t thi s time Sincerely , Bria n Wallaes a
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 117 

Commemorating the 25th anniversary of the construction and dedication 

of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2007 

Mr. HAGEL (for himself, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. KERRY, Mr. WARNER, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. GRASSLEY, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. INHOFE, Mrs. CLINTON, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. DODD, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. REED, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. 

LEVIN, Mr. VITTER, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. BURR, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. SCHUMER, 

Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. BROWN, Mr. DURBIN, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. SPECTER, Mrs. MCCASKILL, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. OBAMA, 

Mr. CRAPO, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. 

SUNUNU, Mr. TESTER, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. 

BYRD, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. BAUCUS, Mrs. 

FEINSTEIN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. COLEMAN, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. CORKER, 

Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. MCCONNELL, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. LOTT, Mr. CARDIN, 

Ms. SNOWE, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. ENZI, and Mr. ALEXANDER) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the 25th anniversary of the construction 

and dedication of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. 

Whereas 2007 marks the 25th anniversary of the construction and dedication of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in 

Washington, DC; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•SRES 117 IS 

Whereas the memorial displays the names of more than 

58,000 men and women who lost their lives between 1956 

and 1975 in the Vietnam combat area or are still missing 

in action; 

Whereas every year millions of people in the United States 

visit the monument to pay their respects to those who 

served in the Armed Forces; 

Whereas the Vietnam Veterans Memorial has been a source 

of comfort and healing for Vietnam veterans and the 

families of the men and women who died while serving 

their country; and 

Whereas the memorial has come to represent a legacy of healing and demonstrates the appreciation of the people of 

the United States for those who made the ultimate sacrifice: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) expresses its support and gratitude for all 

3 of the men and women who served honorably in the 

4 Armed Forces of the United States in defense of 

5 freedom and democracy during the Vietnam War; 

6 (2) extends its sympathies to all people in the 

7 United States who suffered the loss of friends and 

8 family in Vietnam; 

9 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

10 to remember the sacrifices of our veterans; and 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•SRES 117 IS 

1 (4) commemorates the 25th anniversary of the 

2 construction and dedication of the Vietnam Veterans 

3 Memorial. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 81 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company.    /s/ Ted R. Sharp DATE:  June 29, 2006 Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and will be retained by Little Squaw Gold Mining Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1324]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: January 21, 2000 at 11 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agenda for future meeting: none.
2. Minutes.
3. Ratification List.
4. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-278-280 and 347-348 (Review)(Malleable Cast Iron 
Pipe Fittings from Brazil, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand)--
briefing and vote. (The Commission will transmit its determination 
to the Secretary of Commerce on February 3, 2000.)
5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed 
above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over 
to the agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued January 12, 2000.
Donna R. Koehnke,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-1324 Filed 1-14-00; 1:13 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC. (REGISTRANT)
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, James A. Wylie,  Jr.,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Registrant,
certify to the best of my  knowledge  and  belief  pursuant  to  Section  906 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:

          (1)     The  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended
                  September 30, 2003,  which this statement  accompanies,  fully
                  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)     The  information  contained  in the  Quarterly  Report on Form
                  10-QSB  fairly  presents,   in  all  material  respects,   the
                  financial   condition   and  result  of   operations   of  the
                  Registrant.


Date:  November  7, 2003                /s/ JAMES A. WYLIE, JR.
                                        ---------------------------
                                        James A. Wylie, Jr.
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


K-V Pharmaceutical Company
St. Louis, Missouri


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Numbers 2-56793, 2-76173, 33-46400, 33-44927,
33-00199, 333-48252 and 333-85516) and Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File
Number 333-87402) of our reports dated May 24, 2002, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of K-V Pharmaceutical Company
appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year
ended March 31, 2002.

/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

Chicago, Illinois
June 7, 2002
Exhibit
      32





**CONTINENTAL
      BEVERAGE AND NUTRITION, INC.**





**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Continental Beverage and Nutrition,
      Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB of the period ended May 31, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David
      Sackler, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1)
      the
      quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the
      quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                July 21, 2006
              
              /s/
                David Sackler
              Chief
                Executive Officer and Financial
                Officer


13