alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13080]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

[I.D. 051900A]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Northwest Region Logbook Family of Forms.
    Form Number(s): None.
    OMB Approval Number: 0648-0271.
    Type of Request: Extension of currently approved collection.
    Burden Hours: 1,705.
    Number of Respondents: 86.
    Average Hours Per Response: 13 minutes per day for logbooks from 
catcher and mothership vessels, 26 minutes per day for catcher-
processor vessels, 30 minutes or 4.3 minutes per day for a weekly/daily 
production report, 20 minutes for a product transfer/offloading 
logbook, and 1.25 minutes for a start/stop notification.
    Needs and Uses: The information is needed for the management of the 
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery in the Exclusive Economic Zone off the 
states of Washington, Oregon, and California. NOAA had proposed a 
regulation that would require logbooks and other reports from vessels 
participating in this fishery. Currently the vessels are asked to 
voluntarily submit much of the information. The information is used to 
monitor the status of the fishery.
    Affected Public: Business and other for-profit institutions.
    Frequency: Daily, weekly, quarterly, and on occasion (prior to 
certain events).
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, Room 6066, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#88e4ede6efede4e5edc8ece7eba6efe7fe"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a2cec7ccc5c7cecfc7e2c6cdc18cc5cdd4">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10202, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: May 18, 2000.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-13080 Filed 5-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 500.158 Functions delegatable. The Secretary may delegate to the State such functions as he deems useful including the ( a ) Receipt, handling and processing of applications for certificates of registration;
( b ) Issuance of certificates of registration;
( c ) Conduct of various investigations; and
( d ) Enforcement of the Act.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Indian Health Service

# AGENCY:

Indian Health Service, HHS.

# ACTION:

Extension of Deadline for Receipt of Competitive Grant Applications for the Mental Health and Community Safety Initiative for American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) Children, Youth, and Families.

The Notice of funding availability for competitive grants for the mental health and community safety initiative for American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) children, youth, and families was published at 65 FR 26841, on Tuesday, May 9, 2000.

The Indian Health Service (IHS) announces the extension of the application receipt deadlines to June 15, 2000 for the following grant programs included in the above Notice:

1. The AI/AN Mental Health Grants Program funded by the IHS and

2. The Mental Health and Community Safety Initiative for American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) Children, Youth, and Families funded by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS).

This extension to June 15, 2000, provides applicants for both of these programs approximately an additional two weeks to prepare and submit competitive applications.

                    All other information contained in the                     **Federal Register**                     announcement and in the consolidated grant application package distributed in early May remains unchanged.                

Dated: May 19, 2000.

Michael H. Trujillo, 

Assistant Surgeon General, Director.

[FR Doc. 00-13212  Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-16-M
#### § 3.10 Methods of payment of wages.

The payment of wages shall be by cash, negotiable instruments payable on demand, or the additional forms of compensation for which deductions are permissible under this part. No other methods of payment shall be recognized on work subject to the Copeland Act.
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

No. 1 13,267

L UKE G ANNON , by his N ext F riends and G uardians, et al.
,

Appell ees ,

v.

S TATE OF K ANSAS , Appell ant.

ORDER

The court notes Kansas Solicitor General Anthony Powell's entry of appearance as
counsel for State of Kansas

.

In Gannon v. State , 309 Kan. 1185, 443 P.3d 294 (2019) ( Gannon VII ), the court retained jurisdiction to ensure continued legislative compliance with the school funding requirements of a rticle 6, § 6(b) of the Kansas Constitution as mandated in G annon v. State , 308 Kan. 372, 420 P.3d 477 (2018) ( Gannon VI ). In 2 019 House Substitute for Senate Bill 16 (S.B. 16), the Legislature scheduled a series of incremental increases to the
base aid for student excellence (BASE) culminating in school year 2022

- 2023. The court retained jurisdiction to ensure the State's implementation of the phased

- in financial solution in S.B. 16, which solution the court accepted in Gannon VI

.

The State now asks the court to issue the mandate , noting that the BASE increases have been implemented

. The plaintiffs acknowledge the BASE increases and the Legislature ' s appropriation of funding for both school years 2023

- 2024 and 2024

- 2025 using the approved formula, but they argue no one can know whether these amounts are
sufficient. Given the c ourt's stated purpose was to retain jurisdiction to ensure implementation of the phased

- in amounts and that has occurred, a majority of t he court2

grants the State 's motion . The court directs the Clerk of the Appellate Courts to issue the
mandate instanter.

Justice Rosen dissents. Given the legislative history of school funding, Justice Rosen would deny the State ' s motion and continue to withhold the mandate.

The court notes the plaintiffs ' response to the State's motion and the State's reply
thereto

.

The court denies Kansas Governor Laura Kelly's application to file a brief amicus
curiae under Supreme Court R ule 6.06 (2023 Kan. S. Ct. R. at 38). The court do es not currently permit the filing of a brief by an amicus curiae w hen , as here, the court has not invited the parties to submit brief s on a motion. See Supreme Court R ule 5.01 (2023 Kan. S. Ct. R. at 31) ( generally governing appellate motions practice)

.

The court directs that this order be published in the official Kansas Reports

.

S TEGALL , J., not participating

.

Dated this 6th day of Febr uary 202 4

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000057497
<NAME> THE LAMSON & SESSIONS CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                           1,937
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     39,162
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,975
<PP&E>                                         113,842
<DEPRECIATION>                                  63,107
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 160,667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,278
<BONDS>                                         40,807
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,344
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,787
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   160,667
<SALES>                                        270,914
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               270,914
<CGS>                                          218,097
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  218,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,897
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,341
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,579
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,100)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,679
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,679
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.50
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-10907

Conference Calendar

 

CHARLES RAY GOSS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MONTFORD UNIT; NFN JETER, Lieutenant,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:01-CV-149-C

--------------------

December 12, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Charles Ray Goss (Texas prisoner #923183) appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his civil rights action under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) as frivolous and for failure to state a

claim. He argues that his complaint should not have been

dismissed because the racial slur and the other statements made

to him by Lieutenant Jeter violated his Fourteenth Amendment

equal-protection right to be free from racial discrimination. 

Goss’ argument, however, is unavailing. See Williams v. Bramer,

180 F.3d 699, 706 (5th Cir. 1999)(stating that “[w]here the
No. 01-10907

-2-

conduct at issue consists solely of speech, there is no equal

protection violation”); Bender v. Brumley, 1 F.3d 271, 274 n.4

(5th Cir. 1993)(stating that allegations of verbal abuse as well

as threatening language and gestures on the part of a

correctional officer do not rise to the level of a constitutional

violation). Accordingly, the district court did not err in

dismissing Goss’ complaint. See Bass v. Parkwood Hosp., 180 F.3d

234, 240 (5th Cir. 1999).

Goss’ appeal is frivolous and is therefore DISMISSED. See

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2. The dismissal of Goss’ complaint as frivolous and for

failure to state a claim and the dismissal of this appeal as

frivolous each count as a strike for the purposes of 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th

Cir. 1996). We caution Goss that once he accumulates three

strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action

or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any

facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) WARNING ISSUED.
## **Exhibit 31.2**

## Louisville Gas and Electric Company

I, S. BradfordRives, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of Louisville Gas and Electric Company;

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 21, 2007
| /s/ S. Bradford Rives    |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| S. Bradford  Rives       |
| Chief Financial  Officer |

 

1

----
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48862-48863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20130]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y

[[Page 48863]]

(12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely 
related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless 
otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the 
United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than August 24, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Vice President) 
33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. ES Bancshares Inc., Newburgh, New York; to engage de novo 
through its subsidiary, Empire Lockbox Settlements, Inc., Newburgh, New 
York, and thereby engage in extending credit and servicing loans, 
pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Acting Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. First Bank of Miami Shares, Inc., Coral Gables, Florida; to 
retain FBM International Advisors, Inc., Coral Gables, Florida, and 
thereby engage in investment advisory activities, pursuant to section 
228.28(b)(6)(i) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 4, 
2011.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-20130 Filed 8-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-67880, No. 33-87196, No. 33-94888, No. 333-60617, and No. 333-42466 of The
First Years Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated February 27, 2001, appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The First Years Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2000.

/S/  DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 2001

                                      IV-21
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Decem ber 1 4 , 2016 

# Order

Clerk December 14 , 2016

15 4 776 ( 5 1 )

VANESSA OZIMEK

, P laintiff

- Appell ant

, SC: 15 4 776

v COA: 3 31 726

Wayne CC : 1 3

- 109046

- DC

LEE J. RODGERS

, Defendant

- Appellee

. _________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the joint motion of the Michigan Coalition of

Family Law Appellate Attorneys and the Legal Services Association of Michigan to file a

brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on December 7

, 2016, is

accepted for filing

.
§ 519.1 Applicability of the regulations in this subpart. ( a ) *Statutory provisions.* Under section 14 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, and the authority and responsibility delegated to him/her by the Secretary of Labor (36 FR 8755) and by the Assistant Secretary for Employment Standards (39 FR 33841) the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division is authorized and directed, to the extent necessary in order to prevent curtailment of opportunities for employment, to provide by regulation or order for the employment, under certificates, of full-time students in retail or service establishments, or in agriculture. That section contains provisions requiring a wage rate in such certificates of not less than 85 percent of the minimum wage applicable under section 6 of the Act, limiting weekly hours of employment, stipulating compliance with the applicable child-labor standards, and safeguarding against the reduction of the full-time employment opportunities of employees other than full-time students employed under certificates.
( b ) *Source of limitations.* Some of the limitations in this subpart are specifically required in section 14(b) of the Act. The other limitations implement the provisions in that section relating to employment opportunities, *i.e.,* the “extent necessary to prevent curtailment of opportunities for employment” and the avoidance of a “substantial probability of reducing the full-time employment opportunities of persons other than those to whom the minimum wage rate authorized” under section 14(b) is applicable.
[40 FR 6329, Feb. 11, 1975; 40 FR 22546, May 23, 1975]
**HORIZON      BANCORPORATION, INC.**

| 3. | Horizon                Bancorporation, Inc's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period                ended                March 31, 2005, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit                (the                "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)                or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Horizon                Bancorporation, Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|