alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: "Bromberg, Kevin L." <kevin.bromberg@sba.gov>

To: Dina Kruger/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/31/2011 11:59 AM

Subject: FW: LDAR requirements for ozone depleting substances



### Hi Dina

– could you identify the correct person for John Hopewell to contact on this rule?

They’re looking for a 30 day extension on this rule.

Thx

Kevin

From: John Hopewell [ mailto:jhopewell@paint.org ]

Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 11:36 AM

To: Bromberg, Kevin L.

Cc: ccooper@ashland.com; Rostker, David J.

Subject: RE: LDAR requirements for ozone depleting substances

T hanks, Kevin, I understand. Go figure that the staff person at EPA on it has changed and I've been in

the process of tracking that person down since last week.

From: Bromberg, Kevin L. [ mailto:kevin.bromberg@sba.gov ]

Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 11:30 AM

To: John Hopewell

Cc: ccooper@ashland.com; Rostker, David J.

Subject: RE: LDAR re quirements for ozone depleting substances



### We are buried here

– and Dave Rostker is the contact on this one. We don’t normally join trade

associations on letters. I do recommend first contacting the program office

– I suspect an

extension is doable.

From: John Hopewell [ mailto:jhopewell@paint.org ]

Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 10:48 AM

To: Bromberg, Kevin L.

Cc: ccooper@ashland.com

Subject: RE: LDAR requirements for ozone depleting substances

Hi Kevin

- I'm just following up on the below...

From: John Hopewell

Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:38 AM

To: Bromberg, Kevin L.

Subject: LDAR requirements for ozone depleting substances



### Dear Kevin,

At our Environmental Management Committee this week we discussed the attached proposed

rule (Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Amendments to the Section 608 Leak Repair

Requirements). It appears that this is not on the radar screen of other associations and caught us

a little by surprise. The rule is complicated and comments are due Feb 14, 2011.

### Do you think there is any possibility of getting a 30

- day extension to the deadline? I'd be more

than happy to draft so mething that perhaps SBA and others could sign onto. Let me know

ASAP. Thanks.

Regards,

John

John Hopewell

Asst. Director, Environmental Affairs

Coordinator, International Programs

American Coatings Association (ACA)

1500 Rhode Island Ave, NW

Washington , DC 20005

Phone: +1 202 462 6272

Fax: +1 202 462 8549

jhopewell@paint.org
`[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 8 Referred in House (RFH)]







110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 8


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2007

           Referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
Providing for the reappointment of Patricia Q. Stonesifer as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other 
than Members of Congress, occurring because of the expiration of the 
term of Patricia Q. Stonesifer of Washington, is filled by the 
reappointment of Patricia Q. Stonesifer, for a term of 6 years, 
effective December 22, 2007.

            Passed the Senate July 31, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.`
#### § 500.127 Limitations on cancellation of insurance or liability bond of registered farm labor contractors.

Any insurance policy or liability bond obtained by a farm labor contractor who is required to register with the Department of Labor shall provide that it shall not be cancelled, rescinded, or suspended, nor become void for any reason whatsoever during such period in which the insurance or liability bond is required by the Act to be effective, except upon the expiration of the term for which it is written; or unless the parties desiring to cancel shall have first given thirty (30) days notice to the Administrator. The notice will include a statement setting forth the reason for cancellation, rescission, suspension, or any other termination of such policy or bond. The notice shall be in writing and forwarded via certified or registered mail, addressed to the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210. Said thirty (30) days notice shall commence to run from the date notice is actually received by the Administrator.
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 57 FR 31451, July 16, 1992.

§ 20.80 Opportunity for repayment. ( a ) The creditor Labor Department agency shall afford the debtor the opportunity to ( 1 ) repay the debt or
( 2 ) enter into a repayment plan which is agreeable to the agency head (or designee) and is in a written form signed by such debtor and the creditor agency. The head of the agency (or designee) may deem a repayment plan to be abrogated if the debtor should, after the repayment plan is signed, fail to comply with the terms of the plan.
( b ) Agencies have discretion and should exercise sound judgment in determining whether to accept a repayment agreement in lieu of offset. The determination should balance the Government's interest in collecting the debt against fairness to the debtor. If the debt is delinquent and the debtor has not disputed its existence or amount, an agency should effect an offset unless the debtor is able to establish that offset would result in undue financial hardship or would be against equity and good conscience, or the agency otherwise determines that offset would be contrary to sound judgment.
|EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                         OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer
of 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. (the Company), that the Annual Report of the
Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 13, 2009
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | By:/s/
Alfred R. Kahn     
Alfred R. Kahn      Chairman of the Board and      Chief Executive
Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: March 13, 2009
|--------------------

| | By:/s/
Bruce R. Foster     
Bruce R. Foster      Executive Vice President and      Chief Financial
Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. and will
be retained by 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 172 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 172

  Commemorating the 400th Anniversary of the settlement of Jamestown.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2007

     Mr. Warner (for himself and Mr. Webb) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Commemorating the 400th Anniversary of the settlement of Jamestown.

Whereas the founding of the colony at Jamestown, Virginia, in 1607, the first 
        permanent English colony in America, and the capital of Virginia for 92 
        years, has major significance in the history of the United States;
Whereas the Jamestown Settlement owed its survival in large measure to the 
        compassion and aid of the Native people in its vicinity;
Whereas Native Virginia people substantially aided the Jamestown colonists with 
        food and supplies at times that were crucial to their survival;
Whereas the Native people served as guides to geography and natural resources, 
        crucial assistance in the Virginia colonists' exploration of the 
        Chesapeake Region;
Whereas the Jamestown Settlement brought people from throughout the Atlantic 
        Basin together to form a society that drew upon the strengths and 
        characteristics of English, European, African, and Native American 
        cultures;
Whereas the economic, political, religious, and social institutions that 
        developed during the first 9 decades of the existence of Jamestown 
        continue to have profound effects on the United States, particularly in 
        English common law and language, cross cultural relationships, 
        manufacturing, and economic structure and status;
Whereas the National Park Service, the Association for the Preservation of 
        Virginia Antiquities, and the Jamestown-Yorktown Foundation of the 
        Commonwealth of Virginia collectively own and operate significant 
        resources related to the early history of Jamestown;
Whereas, in 2000, Congress established the Jamestown 400th Commemoration 
        Commission to ensure a suitable national observance of the Jamestown 
        2007 anniversary, and Congress commends the Commission's hard work and 
        dedication;
Whereas Congress reminds all Americans of the importance of their country's 
        history and founding at Jamestown; and
Whereas the 2007 observance of the founding of Jamestown commemorates the 400th 
        anniversary of the first permanent English colony in America: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate commemorates the 400th Anniversary of the 
founding of the colony Jamestown in 1607 and urges all Americans to 
honor this seminal event in our Nation's history.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

EX-11 Statement re: computation of earnings per share


LOSS PER SHARE

Computation of loss per share
(in thousands, except per share data)

                                                Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                    2000            1999
                                                ------------   -------------

Loss from continuing operations                 $     50,290  $      31,151
                                                ============  =============
Net loss attributable to common stockholders    $     62,426  $      58,274
                                                ============  =============
Weighted average shares of common stock
outstanding used in computing basic and
diluted net loss per share attributable
to common stockholders                                29,691         14,656
                                                ============  =============

Basic and diluted net loss per share
attributable to common stockholders             $      (2.10) $       (3.74)
                                                ============  =============

Shares of common stock used in computing
pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share                       18,295
                                                              =============

Pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share                $       (2.60)
                                                              =============

                                       25
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Population and Prevelance /
              - 1.3 Civilians Living in the Community for the U.S. by Disability Status

## Table 1.3 Civilians Living in the Community for the United States and States, by Disability Status: 2012

Based on data from the American Community Survey (ACS), in 2012, there were 312,538,222 individuals living in the community, 38,397,863 of which were individuals with disabilities—a prevalence rate of 12.3 percent. The state with the largest number of individuals with disabilities was California, with 3,821,538 individuals with disabilities, while the state with the smallest number of individuals with disabilities was Wyoming, with 66,426 individuals with disabilities. Alabama and Arkansas had the highest prevalence rate, 16.4 percent, while Utah had the lowest prevalence rate, 9.2 percent.

----

Source:U.S. Census Bureau2012 American Community SurveyAmerican FactFinder, Table B18101http://factfinder2.census.gov(accessed 23 September, 2013)Based on a sample and subject to sampling variability.

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
#### § 2700.26 Notice of contest of proposed penalty assessment.

A person has 30 days after receipt of the proposed penalty assessment within which to notify the Secretary that he contests the proposed penalty assessment. A person who wishes to contest a proposed penalty assessment must provide such notification regardless of whether the person has previously contested the underlying citation or order pursuant to § 2700.20. The Secretary shall immediately transmit to the Commission any notice of contest of a proposed penalty assessment.

[71 FR 44207, Aug. 4, 2006]
# Support Documents for

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) on

Premanufacture Notice (PMN)

P-02-1040

EPA Docket EPA

- HQ

- OPPT -2011-0577

# Index

A-001 Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report for

PMN P-02-1040

A-002 Initial Review Engineering Report for

PMN P-02-1040

A-003 Initial Review Exposure Report for

PMN P-02-1040

# A-001

Structur e Activity Team (SAT) Report

for PMN P-02-1040

# A-002

Initial Review Engineering Report

for PMN P-02-1040

# A-003

Initial Review Exposure Report

for PMN P-02-1040
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 24

- 00031

- CV

In re Michael McPhee

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM SAN SABA COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus and motion to stay are denied. See Tex. R.

App. P. 52.8(a).

_______________________ ___________________

Chari L. Kelly , Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly

Filed: January 23, 2024
# EUR-Lex - 31999R1648 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999R1648

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1648/1999 of 27 July 1999 derogating from Regulation (EEC) No 1589/87 on the sale by tender of butter to intervention agencies **

*
Official Journal L 195 , 28/07/1999 P. 0014 - 0014 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1648/1999

of 27 July 1999

derogating from Regulation (EEC) No 1589/87 on the sale by tender of butter to intervention agencies

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1587/96(2), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7a(1) and Article 7a(3) thereof,

(1) Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1589/87(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 124/1999(4), establishes the rules for the sale by tender of butter to intervention agencies; whereas Article 3(1) of that Regulation stipulates that tenderers may take part in the invitation to tenders only in respect of butter manufactured in the 21 days preceding the final date for the submission of tenders;

(2) Whereas, in view of the fact that a single invitation to tender takes place at the end of August, and that therefore a period of 28 days separates that invitation to tender from the final invitation to tender in July, the period of 21 days is too short to give access to intervention to all the butter manufactured in the period between the two invitations to tender; whereas therefore there should be a temporary extension to 28 days of the period during which butter may be manufactured and offered for intervention;

(3) Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

By derogation from Article 3(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1589/87 and in respect of the invitation to tender for which the time limit for the submission of tenders expires on the fourth Tuesday of August 1999, the manufacturing period referred to in the above paragraph shall be 28 days.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 July 1999.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 148, 28.6.1968, p. 13.

(2) OJ L 206, 16.8.1996, p. 21.

(3) OJ L 146, 6.6.1987, p. 27.

(4) OJ L 16, 21.1.1999, p. 19.
§ 1910.24 Step bolts and manhole steps. ( a ) *Step bolts.* The employer must ensure: ( 1 ) Each step bolt installed on or after January 17, 2017 in an environment where corrosion may occur is constructed of, or coated with, material that protects against corrosion;
( 2 ) Each step bolt is designed, constructed, and maintained to prevent the employee's foot from slipping off the end of the step bolt;
( 3 ) Step bolts are uniformly spaced at a vertical distance of not less than 12 inches (30 cm) and not more than 18 inches (46 cm) apart, measured center to center (see Figure D-6 of this section). The spacing from the entry and exit surface to the first step bolt may differ from the spacing between the other step bolts;
( 4 ) Each step bolt has a minimum clear width of 4.5 inches (11 cm);
( 5 ) The minimum perpendicular distance between the centerline of each step bolt to the nearest permanent object in back of the step bolt is 7 inches (18 cm). When the employer demonstrates that an obstruction cannot be avoided, the distance must be at least 4.5 inches (11 cm);
( 6 ) Each step bolt installed before January 17, 2017 is capable of supporting its maximum intended load;
( 7 ) Each step bolt installed on or after January 17, 2017 is capable of supporting at least four times its maximum intended load;
( 8 ) Each step bolt is inspected at the start of the workshift and maintained in accordance with § 1910.22; and
( 9 ) Any step bolt that is bent more than 15 degrees from the perpendicular in any direction is removed and replaced with a step bolt that meets the requirements of this section before an employee uses it.
( b ) *Manhole steps.* ( 1 ) The employer must ensure that each manhole step is capable of supporting its maximum intended load.
( 2 ) The employer must ensure that each manhole step installed on or after January 17, 2017: ( i ) Has a corrugated, knurled, dimpled, or other surface that minimizes the possibility of an employee slipping;
( ii ) Is constructed of, or coated with, material that protects against corrosion if the manhole step is located in an environment where corrosion may occur;
( iii ) Has a minimum clear step width of 10 inches (25 cm);
( iv ) Is uniformly spaced at a vertical distance not more than 16 inches (41 cm) apart, measured center to center between steps. The spacing from the entry and exit surface to the first manhole step may differ from the spacing between the other steps.
( v ) Has a minimum perpendicular distance between the centerline of the manhole step to the nearest permanent object in back of the step of at least 4.5 inches (11 cm); and
( vi ) Is designed, constructed, and maintained to prevent the employee's foot from slipping or sliding off the end.
( 3 ) The employer must ensure that each manhole step is inspected at the start of the work shift and maintained in accordance with § 1910.22.