alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 45 

Commending the Ed Block Courage Award Foundation for its work in aiding 

children and families affected by child abuse, and designating November 

2007 as National Courage Month. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2007 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself and Mr. CORNYN) submitted the following concurrent 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Commending the Ed Block Courage Award Foundation for 

its work in aiding children and families affected by child 

abuse, and designating November 2007 as National 

Courage Month. 

Whereas the Ed Block Courage Award was established by 

Sam Lamantia in 1978 in honor of Ed Block, the head 

athletic trainer of the Baltimore Colts and a respected 

humanitarian; 

Whereas each year in Baltimore, Maryland, the Foundation 

honors recipients from the National Football League who 

have been chosen by their teammates as exemplifying 

sportsmanship and courage; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•SCON 45 IS 

Whereas the Ed Block Courage Award has become one of the 

most esteemed honors bestowed upon players in the 

NFL; 

Whereas the Ed Block Courage Award Foundation has grown 

from a Baltimore-based local charity to the Courage 

House National Support Network for Kids operated in 

partnership with 17 NFL teams in their respective cities; 

and 

Whereas Courage Houses are facilities that provide support 

and care for abused children and their families in these 

17 locations across the country: Baltimore, Maryland, 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Chicago, Illinois, Miami, Florida, Detroit, Michigan, Dallas, Texas, Westchester County, New York, Oakland, California, Seattle, Washington, 

Charlotte, North Carolina, Cleveland, Ohio, Atlanta, 

Georgia, St. Louis, Missouri, Indianapolis, Indiana, Buffalo, New York, San Francisco, California, and Minneapolis, Minnesota: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that— 

3 (1) National Courage Month provides an oppor4 tunity to educate the people of the United States 

5 about the positive role that professional athletes can 

6 play as inspirations for America’s youth; and 

7 (2) the Ed Block Courage Award Foundation 

8 should be recognized for its outstanding contribu9 tions toward helping those affected by child abuse. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 162 

Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by 

the men and women who have lost their lives while serving as law 

enforcement officers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 20, 2007 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. 

CORNYN, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. REID, Mr. DURBIN, and Mr. MENENDEZ) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by the men and women who have lost their 

lives while serving as law enforcement officers. 

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is 

preserved and enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance 

and dedication of law enforcement personnel; 

Whereas more than 900,000 men and women, at great risk 

to their personal safety, presently serve their fellow citizens as guardians of the peace; 

Whereas peace officers are on the front lines in preserving 

the right of the children of the United States to receive 

an education in a crime-free environment, a right that is 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 162 IS 

all too often threatened by the insidious fear caused by 

violence in schools; 

Whereas 147 peace officers across the United States were 

killed in the line of duty during 2006, which is below the 

decade-long annual average of 167 deaths; 

Whereas a number of factors contributed to this reduction in 

deaths, including— 

(1) better equipment and increased use of bullet-resistant vests; 

(2) improved training; 

(3) longer prison terms for violent offenders; and 

(4) advanced emergency medical care; 

Whereas every other day, 1 out of every 16 peace officers is 

assaulted, 1 out of every 56 peace officers is injured, and 

1 out of every 5,500 peace officers is killed in the line 

of duty somewhere in the United States; and 

Whereas on May 15, 2007, more than 20,000 peace officers 

are expected to gather in Washington, D.C., to join with 

the families of their recently fallen comrades to honor 

those comrades and all others who went before them: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes May 15, 2007, as ‘‘Peace Offi3 cers Memorial Day’’, in honor of the Federal, State, 

4 and local officers that have been killed or disabled 

5 in the line of duty; and 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 162 IS 

1 (2) calls on the people of the United States to 

2 observe that day with appropriate ceremonies and 

3 respect. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
#### IGNATIUS LEWSHITZ v MAGDALENA LEWSHITZ et

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 10328.

Decided Dec 9, 1929

Dunlap, Stephens & Stephens, Cleveland, for Ignatius Lewshitz.

V.. L. Conrad, Cleveland, for Magdalena Lewshitz.

LEMERT, PJ and SHERICK, J (5th Dist) sitting.

*233LEMERT, PJ.

We believe that this holding and ruling of the court below was error and reversible error for the reason that in the former suit the defendant in error was called upon to make good her cause of action for divorce and she must do so by all proper means within her control and that all matters within the scope of the former suit are put to rest by the final determination of that .suit. 29 O. C. R. 429; 27 OS. 233 and 674; 28 OS. 596; 82 OS. 121.

Where a petition for divorce has been dismissed upon a hearing upon the merits in a case where the court had jurisdiction of the person and the subject matter, such order and judgment of dismissal is a bar to future proceedings in a new action in any court as to all grounds for divorce alleged in the petition so dismissed; or that were known to the plaintiff to exist at the time of the filing of such petition. 21 OS. 356.

Counsel for defendant in error on the trial sought to avoid the plaintiff in error’s plea in bar by an entry of the Common Pleas Court made on the 21st day of March, 1929 in this former suit, which entry was made nine months after the final disposition of this former suit in said court, which entry of March 21st, 1929, reads as follows:

> “This case is dismissed by plaintiff without prejudice at costs of plaintiff for which judgment is rendered, record waived.”

This entry we believe is without force or effect for the reason that there was no such action then pending in the Court of Common Pleas in which the court could make any entry. The entry finally disposing of the case was made by the Common Pleas Court on June 21, 1928, and this entry stands unaffected by the dismissal entry of March 21, 1929.

Thus finding and holding that the court below committed an error as hereinbefore explained, it is unnecessary in this opinion to comment upon the other assignments of error mentioned in plaintiff’s petition in error but which were not stressed by plaintiff in error in oral argument in this case. It, therefore, follows, that the entry and judgment of the Common Pleas Court hereinbefore made is declared null and void and held for naught, and the finding and judgment of the Common Pleas Court is hereby reversed and judgment against defendant in error for costs. Exceptions may be noted.

Sherick, J., concurs. Houck, J., not participating.
#### § 457.13 Director.

*Director* means the Director of the Office of Labor-Management Standards, head of the Office of Labor-Management Standards.[2]

[78 FR 8026, Feb. 5, 2013]

###### Footnotes -
  457.13

[2] Pursuant to Secretary of Labor's Orders No. 02-2012, 77 FR 69378 (November 16, 2012), and 03-2012, 77 FR 69376 (November 16, 2012), the Director of the Office of Labor-Management Standards has certain responsibilities and authority for implementing the standards of conduct provisions of the CSRA and the FSA.
#### § 417.21 Transcript.

It shall be within the discretion of the Director to require an official reporter to make an official transcript of the hearings. In the event he does so require, copies of the official transcript shall be made available upon request addressed to the Director in accordance with the provisions of part 70 of this title.

[50 FR 31310, Aug. 1, 1985, as amended at 63 FR 33779, June 19, 1998; 78 FR 8025, Feb. 5, 2013]
EXHIBIT  3.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

         CAPITAL SOLUTIONS I, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "CORPORATION")
hereby certifies:

         FIRST:   The name of the Corporation is Capital Solutions I, Inc..

         SECOND: Pursuant to Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation
Law, this Certificate of Amendment amends the provisions of the Corporation's
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the "CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION").

         THIRD: The terms and provisions of this Certificate of Amendment have
been duly approved by (i) the Board of Directors of the Corporation by
resolution setting forth the amendment contained herein, and (ii) the required
number of shares of outstanding common stock of the Corporation, in each case
pursuant to and in accordance with Section 242 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law.

         FOURTH: Article FOURTH of the Certificate of Incorporation is hereby
amended by adding the following after clause (b):

           Effective at 5:00 PM on May 10, 2004, (the "EFFECTIVE TIME"), every
           50 shares of capital stock issued and outstanding, or held as
           treasury stock, shall be automatically combined into 1 share of the
           same class of capital stock, subject to the treatment of fractional
           share interests described below (the "REVERSE STOCK SPLIT"). The
           corporation will evidence the Reverse Stock Split effected hereby
           pursuant to procedures adopted by the board of directors. In
           connection with the Reverse Stock Split, no scrip or fractional share
           certificates will be issued and, as of the Effective Date, fractional
           shares resulting from the Reverse Split will be rounded up to the
           next whole share.

           The Company shall, through its transfer agent, provide certificates
           representing new shares of capital stock to holders of existing
           shares of capital stock in exchange for certificates representing
           such shares. From and after the Effective Date, certificates
           representing shares of existing capital stock will be canceled and
           shall represent only the right of holders thereof to receive shares
           of new capital stock.

         FIFTH: This Certificate of Amendment of Incorporation shall be
effective as of May 10, 2004 at 5:00 PM.

                                           [signature page follows]
<PAGE>
         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate of
Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation as of May 5, 2004.

                                            CAPITAL SOLUTIONS I, INC.

                                               By:/s/ Christopher Astrom
                                                  ----------------------
                                               Name:    Christopher Astrom
                                               Title:   Chief Executive Officer
#### § 2590.734 Enforcement. [Reserved]
§ 4204.13 Net income and net tangible assets tests. ( a ) *General.* The criteria under this section are that either— ( 1 ) *Net income test.* The purchaser's average net income after taxes for its three most recent fiscal years ending before the date of determination (as defined in § 4204.12), reduced by any interest expense incurred with respect to the sale which is payable in the fiscal year following the date of determination, equals or exceeds 150 percent of the amount of the bond or escrow required under ERISA section 4204(a)(1)(B); or
( 2 ) *Net tangible assets test.* The purchaser's net tangible assets at the end of the fiscal year preceding the date of determination (as defined in § 4204.12), equal or exceed— ( i ) If the purchaser was not obligated to contribute to the plan before the sale, the amount of unfunded vested benefits allocable to the seller under section 4211 (with respect to the purchased operations), as of the date of determination, or
( ii ) If the purchaser was obligated to contribute to the plan before the sale, the sum of the amount of unfunded vested benefits allocable to the purchaser and to the seller under ERISA section 4211 (with respect to the purchased operations), each as of the date of determination.
( b ) *Special rule when more than one plan is covered by request.* For the purposes of paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2), if the transaction involves the assumption by the purchaser of the seller's obligation to contribute to more than one multiemployer plan, then the total amount of the bond or escrow or of the unfunded vested benefits, as applicable, for all of the plans with respect to which the purchaser has not posted a bond or escrow shall be used to determine whether the applicable test is met.
( c ) *Non-applicability of tests in event of purchaser's insolvency.* A purchaser will not qualify for a variance under this subpart pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section if, as of the earlier of the date of the plan's decision on the variance request or the first day of the first plan year beginning after the date of determination, the purchaser is the subject of a petition under title 11, United States Code, or of a proceeding under similar provisions of state insolvency laws.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 9404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4327]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Paducah

AGENCY: Department of Energy (DOE).

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Paducah. The Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that 
public notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Barkley Centre, 111 Memorial Drive, Paducah, Kentucky 42001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reinhard Knerr, Deputy Designated 
Federal Officer, Department of Energy Paducah Site Office, Post Office 
Box 1410, MS-103, Paducah, Kentucky 42001, (270) 441-6825.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the areas of 
environmental restoration, waste management and related activities.
Tentative Agenda:

 Call to Order, Introductions, Review of Agenda
 Deputy Designated Federal Officer's Comments
 Federal Coordinator's Comments
 Liaisons' Comments
 Subcommittee Chairs' Comments
 Presentations
 Administrative Issues
    [cir] Recommendation on Heath Elementary School Site Sampling
    [cir] Recommendation on Northwest Plume Optimization
 Public Comments
 Final Comments
 Adjourn

Breaks Taken As Appropriate
    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Paducah, welcomes the attendance 
of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will make every 
effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or special 
needs. If you require special accommodations due to a disability, 
please contact Reinhard Knerr at least seven days in advance of the 
meeting at the telephone number listed above. Written statements may be 
filed with the Board either before or after the meeting. Individuals 
who wish to make oral statements pertaining to agenda items should 
contact Reinhard Knerr at the address or telephone number listed above. 
Requests must be received five days prior to the meeting and reasonable 
provision will be made to include the presentation in the agenda. The 
Deputy Designated Federal Officer is empowered to conduct the meeting 
in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business. 
Individuals wishing to make public comments will be provided a maximum 
of five minutes to present their comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing or calling Reinhard 
Knerr at the address and phone number listed above. Minutes will also 
be available at the following Web site: http://www.pgdpcab.org/meetings.html.

    Issued at Washington, DC on February 24, 2010.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-4327 Filed 3-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.2
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Jupiter Marine International
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 29, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Lawrence Tierney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date:  October 20, 2006

/s/ Lawrence Tierney
--------------------
Lawrence Tierney
Chief Financial Officer
#### § 531.35 “Free and clear” payment; “kickbacks.”

Whether in cash or in facilities, “wages” cannot be considered to have been paid by the employer and received by the employee unless they are paid finally and unconditionally or “free and clear.” The wage requirements of the Act will not be met where the employee “kicks-back” directly or indirectly to the employer or to another person for the employer's benefit the whole or part of the wage delivered to the employee. This is true whether the “kick-back” is made in cash or in other than cash. For example, if it is a requirement of the employer that the employee must provide tools of the trade which will be used in or are specifically required for the performance of the employer's particular work, there would be a violation of the Act in any workweek when the cost of such tools purchased by the employee cuts into the minimum or overtime wages required to be paid him under the Act. See also in this connection, § 531.32(c).
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12887]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group Population Research Subcommittee.
    Date: June 12-13, 2000.
    Time: 7:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Jon M. Ranhand, Health Scientist Administrator, 
Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health 
and Human Development, 6100 Executive Blvd., rm. 5E01, MSC 7510, 
Bethesda, MD 20892; (301) 435-6884.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 16, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-12887 Filed 5-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 1926

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.24 Fire protection and prevention.

The employer shall be responsible for the development and maintenance of an effective fire protection and prevention program at the job site throughout all phases of the construction, repair, alteration, or demolition work. The employer shall ensure the availability of the fire protection and suppression equipment required by subpart F of this part.
797 A.2d 894

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. James ESPER, Respondent.

No. 746 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 20, 2002.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2002, there having been filed with this Court by James Esper his verified Statement of *404Resignation dated April 4, 2002, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of James Esper be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.