alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TriadHospitals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Burke W. Whitman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ Burke W. Whitman

Burke W. Whitman 

Chief Financial Officer 

May 14, 2003 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Argued June 5;

affirmed June 30, 1931.

#### LONGDEN *v.*SOUTHERN OREGON STAGES

(1 P. (2d) 596)

*Alva W. Person, Jr.,*of Portland (Allan A. Bynon, of Portland, on the brief), for appellant.

*John Irwin,*of Klamath Falls (Oneill & Irwin, of Klamath Falls, on the brief), for respondent.

BEAN, C. J.

This a companion case to that of *Mansfield v. Southern Oregon Stages,*ante, p. 669, in which an opinion has been this day rendered. The cause .of action arises out of the same accident. The questions involved herein are like those in the Mansfield case, except that A. J. Mansfield, as a witness, testified as to the occurrence and the locality and various points involved in the accident prior to the introduction of the map referred to in the Mansfield case. The case is governed by the opinion in the Mansfield case.

Finding no reversible error in the record, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Rand and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Rossman, J., dissents.
DKYHn i tMCKbU N 6 hiiut t i-axibai-bau-iHS b Se p 4 'iiUU a U3:dBai n PU01/00 1 

### BRYAN T EMERSO N & FITCH , LL

P Attorney s a

t La w 

# ^ M S

Septembe r 3,200 9 Ronal d L

- Bryan t • Cni g REmer«o n Edwar d F . Htc h Steve n D . Bxyon

t Michae l R . MclLui e U» aB. X Klem p Aliao n M . Emerso n Ton y F , D e Alicant e • Gar y T . Bruc e * AI M odntUti dmWatkingl m SEN T VI A FA X 202-267-576 9 AN D FIRS T CLAS S MAIL Elizabet h Newma n Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l AGC-600-Airport s an d Environmenta l La w : ' Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 1 ^ RE : DesertWing S Je t

Center , LL C an dCit

y o f Redmon d> 3 Docke t No . 16-09-0 7 Dea r Ms . Newman : I receive d your

voic e mai l aix

d fa x today . I hav e been ou t

o f th e office o n vacatio n fo

r tw o week s and hav e jus t

had a n opportunit

y to revie w th e document s andextensio n reques t filedb y Wing s o f th e Cascades . Th e Cit

y o f Redmondha s n o objectio n t o th e extensio n request . I f yo u nee d anythin g further , pleas e le t m e know . Ver y trul y yours ,

STEVE N D . BRYAN

T SDB-.a h cc : Carri e Novick , Aiipor t Manage r Mar y A . Schxi, President

an d Owne r o f Deser t Wing s Jet Cente r L-L.C , Spirit Flight Inc . db aWing s o f

th e Cascade s O:\Clien6\5DB\Cittei\Chies\Redn»nd*Aiipon.General\Aitport\OeneraJ\DesenWingsJBt\09030 9 FA A Oflie* Chie

f Cowjtl Lener.wp

d

88 S S.W . Erei^reen Ave. P.O . Bc w 45 7 Redmond , O R97756010 3 (541 ) 548-215 1 Fa

x (541 ) 548-1895 E-nui l bef@red]nond-Uwye)rs.cDni i
## MEMORANDUM

**DATE:** 7 /29/15 **FROM:** Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR – 2013 - 0602 **SUBJECT:** Discussion of the Clean Power Plan at the Kentucky Environmental Conference **SUMMARY :**  

### Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan to participants at the KY Environmental Conference in Lexington, KY, February 11, on 2015 

### . The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES: EPA**  Heather McTeer Toney/EPA Region 4 Allison Wise/EPA Region 4 **External Stakeholders** Approximately 80 attendees.
§ 452.20 Nature of executive functions. ( a ) The functions that will bring a particular position with a title other than president, vice-president, secretary-treasurer, or executive board member within the definition of “officer” cannot be precisely defined. They are the functions typically performed by officers holding these titles in current labor union practice. Decisions in each case will require a practical judgment. As a general rule, a person will be regarded as being authorized to perform the functions of president if he is the chief or principal executive officer of the labor organization. Similarly, he will be regarded as being authorized to perform the functions of treasurer if he has principal responsibility for control and management of the organization's funds and fiscal operation. A member of any group, committee, or board which is vested with broad governing or policymaking authority will be regarded as a member of an “executive board or similar governing body.” The name or title that the labor organization assigns to the position is not controlling.
( b ) The purpose of the election requirement of the Act is to assure that persons in positions of control in labor organizations will be responsive to the desires of the members.[18] Professional and other staff members of the labor organization who do not determine the organization's policies or carry on its executive functions and who are employed merely to implement policy decisions and managerial directives established by the governing officials of the organization are not officers and are not required to be elected.
Footnotes -
452.20
[18] See, for example, S. Rept. 187, 86th Cong., 1st sess., p. 7.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 28 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. J. RES. 28

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
     Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
         Commission with respect to broadcast media ownership.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to 
broadcast media ownership (Report and Order FCC 07-216), received by 
Congress on February 22, 2008, and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.

            Passed the Senate May 15, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 28

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

     Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
         Commission with respect to broadcast media ownership.
```
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 155 (Thursday, August 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 49836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20318]



[[Page 49836]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Secretary


List of Countries Requiring Cooperation With an International 
Boycott

    In accordance with section 999(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is publishing a current list of 
countries which require or may require participation in, or cooperation 
with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).
    On the basis of the best information currently available to the 
Department of the Treasury, the following countries require or may 
require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott 
(within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986).

Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, United Arab 
Emirates, Yemen, Republic of

    Iraq is not included in this list, but its status with respect to 
future lists remains under review by the Department of the Treasury.

    Dated: August 1, 2011.
Michael J. Caballero,
International Tax Counsel, (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2011-20318 Filed 8-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-M
(77 South. 1003)

#### GLASS v. CITY OF ANNISTON.

(7 Div. 471.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Dec. 18, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Calhoun County; Hugh D. Merrill, Judge.

P. F. Wharton, of Anniston, for appellant. S. W. Tate, of Anniston, for appellee.

SAMFORD, J.

Affirmed on motion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             796                     655
<SECURITIES>                                    17,521                  30,211
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,044                  34,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                       600                     600
<INVENTORY>                                     30,078                  21,563
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,750                  88,033
<PP&E>                                         250,727                 243,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                 175,249                 177,021
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 209,752                 185,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,896                  18,648
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         6,792                   6,792
<OTHER-SE>                                     148,513                 137,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   209,752                 185,925
<SALES>                                        287,562                 225,974
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               287,562                 225,974
<CGS>                                          238,657                 188,877
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  266,249                 211,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,844                  16,207
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,995                   5,756
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,849                  10,451
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,849                  10,451
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.26                    1.57<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.22                    1.56
<FN>
<F1>Earnings per share information has been prepared in accordance with SFAS No.
128. Basic and diluted earnings per share have been entered in place of primary
and fully diluted earnings per share, respectively.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wartime Prices

              																	Blair, John M., 1914-					,	Ulmer, Melville J. (Melville Jack), 1911-					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Wartime Prices : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 749*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1944,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4235,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
§ 531.32 “Other facilities.” ( a ) “Other facilities,” as used in this section, must be something like board or lodging. The following items have been deemed to be within the meaning of the term: Meals furnished at company restaurants or cafeterias or by hospitals, hotels, or restaurants to their employees; meals, dormitory rooms, and tuition furnished by a college to its student employees; housing furnished for dwelling purposes; general merchandise furnished at company stores and commissaries (including articles of food, clothing, and household effects); fuel (including coal, kerosene, firewood, and lumber slabs), electricity, water, and gas furnished for the noncommercial personal use of the employee; transportation furnished employees between their homes and work where the travel time does not constitute hours worked compensable under the Act and the transportation is not an incident of and necessary to the employment.
( b ) Shares of capital stock in an employer company, representing only a contingent proprietary right to participate in profits and losses or in the assets of the company at some future dissolution date, do not appear to be “facilities” within the meaning of the section.
( c ) It should also be noted that under § 531.3(d)(1), the cost of furnishing “facilities” which are primarily for the benefit or convenience of the employer will not be recognized as reasonable and may not therefore be included in computing wages. Items in addition to those set forth in § 531.3 which have been held to be primarily for the benefit or convenience of the employer and are not therefore to be considered “facilities” within the meaning of section 3(m) include: Safety caps, explosives, and miners' lamps (in the mining industry); electric power (used for commercial production in the interest of the employer); company police and guard protection; taxes and insurance on the employer's buildings which are not used for lodgings furnished to the employee; “dues” to chambers of commerce and other organizations used, for example, to repay subsidies given to the employer to locate his factory in a particular community; transportation charges where such transportation is an incident of and necessary to the employment (as in the case of maintenance-of-way employees of a railroad); charges for rental of uniforms where the nature of the business requires the employee to wear a uniform; medical services and hospitalization which the employer is bound to furnish under workmen's compensation acts, or similar Federal, State, or local law. On the other hand, meals are always regarded as primarily for the benefit and convenience of the employee. For a discussion of reimbursement for expenses such as “supper money,” “travel expenses,” etc., see § 778.217 of this chapter.
#### In the Matter of George W. Criss, Respondent, against James E. Finegan et al., as Commissioners of the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, et al., Appellants, and S. Howard Cohen et al., as Commissioners of the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, Impleaded with Another.

Argued September 27, 1937;

decided October 12, 1937.

*552
      *Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel (William S. Gaud, Jr., Paxton Blair*and *Robert H. Schaffer*of counsel), for appellants.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Henry Epstein*of counsel), for Board of Elections of City of New York, respondent.

*Irving H. Saypol*and *Leo Kotler*for petitioner, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Lotjghran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn Overview of High Bandwidth Liquid Fuel Flow Modulators Developed for Active Combustion Control ResearchThis paper presents a description of the general construction of three high bandwidth liquid fuel modulators along with data corresponding to their respective modulation performance. These devices are a critical element of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Glenn Research Center's (NASA GRC) Active Combustion Control (ACC) task. These devices are not commercially-off-the-shelf available, primarily due to a one kHz bandwidth requirement. Given their special nature, NASA GRC developed specifications for the modulation devices and then, through Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) contracts, had vendors with expertise in valve design manufacture them. The modulators described in this paper are the Active Signal Modulator (ASM), the Jansen's Aircraft System Controls (JASC) modulator, and the WASK Engineering (WASK) modulator. These modulators utilize magnetostrictive, electric motor, or piezoelectric actuation, respectively. The specifications for these devices evolved over time to meet the needs of changing objectives in the ACC research task. This is primarily true with respect to flow number as their designs accommodate a range from one to eight (lbm./hr-psi0.5). These designs also exhibit relatively small volume, weight, and power consumption with an ability to modulate approximately +/- 30% from the mean on a pressure basis. The modulators have been characterized and have undergone laboratory performance tests by the vendors. Their data indicated suitability for continued use in ACC research testing.Document ID20180008494Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSaus, Joseph R.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Thomas, Randy*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredDecember 17, 2018Publication DateDecember 1, 2018Subject CategoryAeronautics (General)AcousticsReport/Patent NumberE-19610NASA/TM-2018-220003GRC-E-DAA-TN60803Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 109492.02.03.02.30Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180008494.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
(76 South. 408)

#### PUTNAM v. STATE.

(7 Div. 467.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 5, 1917.)

1. Criminal Law <&wkey;269 — Misnomer—Plea— Sufficiency.

Where the indictment charged that defendant’s name was Mans Putnam, “to the grand jury otherwise unknown,” defendant’s plea of misnomer was demurrable, where it did not controvert the allegation that defendant’s name was unknown, in view of Code 1907, § 7142, providing that, where defendant’s name is unknown to the grand jury, it may be so alleged, without further identification.

2. Names <&wkey;l6(2) — Idem SoNans.

The names “Mans Putnam” and “Manee Putnam” were idem sonans, making defendant’s plea of misnomer demurrable.

3. Criminal Law <&wkey;1044 — Exclusion oe Testimony — Extent oe Review.

In a trial before the court, defendant’s objection to a question was overruled, and the witness allowed to answer, whereupon the court announced that he would investigate, before deciding the ease, and, if he found he was wrong, would exclude the answer. Defendant’s counsel made no motion to exclude the answer, and it does not appear that the court ever finally passed upon the matter. *Held,*that 'the question would not be reviewed.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Cleburne County; Hugh D. Merrill, Judge.

Mans Putnam was indicted, tried, and convicted of assault and battery, and from the judgment he appeals.

Affirmed.

S. W. Tate, of Anniston, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMFORD, J.

[1, 2] The indictment charges that “Mans Putman, whose name is to the grand jury otherwise unknown,” etc. There was a plea of misnomer, alleging that his true name was Manee, etc. This plea was demurred to, the second and third grounds being as follows:

> “(2) Said indictment alleges that the name of the defendant is, as otherwise alleged in the indictment, unknown to the grand jury and this allegation is not controverted in the plea.

> “(3) It appears from said plea the name of the defendant as alleged in the indictment and *172the name of the defendant as alleged in the 'plea are idem sonans.”

The demurrer was properly sustained First. Ground No. 2 was good. Code, § 7142; O’Brien v. State, 91 Ala. 25, 8 South. 560. Second. Ground No. 3 was good. The names are idem sonans.

[3] The case was tried before the court, without a jury, and the husband of the wife, who was assaulted, was asked the question “Did your wife report to you anything about Mans Putman having been there?” This question was objected to, and the objection overruled. The witness then answered, “Yes,” whereupon the court announced that he would investigate it before he decided the case, and, if he found he was wrong, he would exclude it. The defendant’s counsel does not insist that the court committed reversible error in this, and made no motion to exclude the answer, and it does not appear from the record that the court ever finally passed upon it one way or the other. Under these conditions, we do not pass upon the question.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.