alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.36


 


POWER OF ATTORNEY


 


I, Liu Jian, a citizen of the People's Republic
of China (the “PRC”), PRC ID card number 310102197211124453, hereby irrevocably authorize Beijing Jingwei Sinan
Information Technology Co.,Ltd (“WFOE”) or the individual or entity that is designated by WFOE (each, a “Representative”)
to the extent permitted by applicable laws of the PRC, as my sole attorney to singly exercise the following powers and rights during
the term of this Power of Attorney (“POA”).


 


I hereby authorize and designate the Representative
to vote on my behalf at the shareholders' meetings of Beijing Jingwei Zhihui Information Technology Co.,Ltd (“PRC Company”)
and exercise the full voting rights as its shareholder as granted to me by law and under the Articles of Association of PRC Company,
including but not limited to, the right to propose the holding of shareholders' meeting, to accept any notification about the holding
and discussion procedure of the meeting, to attend the shareholders' meeting of PRC Company and exercise the full voting rights
(such as to serve as my authorized representative at the shareholders' meeting of PRC Company, to designate and appoint the executive
director or directors of the board of PRC Company and the general manager and to decide the allotment of the profits, etc.), and
to sell or transfer any or all of my equity interest in PRC Company.


 


In exercising the rights and powers provided
hereunder, the Representative shall act with due care and diligence and pursuant to this POA and the applicable laws.


 


The term of this Power of Attorney is ten (10)
years from its date of execution, and shall be automatically terminate upon the assignment of the loan in the principal amount
of Nine Hundred Ninety Thousand Renminbi from WFOE to the undersigned, to a third party acceptable to WFOE.


 


	 	Liu Jian
	 	 
	 	/s/ Liu Jian 
	 	Date: May 22nd, 2014
S. Con. Res. 28 Agreed to April 18, 2007

One Hundred Tenth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas the City of Chicago has been selected by the United

States Olympic Committee to represent the United States in

its bid to host the 2016 Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games;

Whereas by 2016, 20 years will have passed since the Summer

Olympics were held in a city in the United States;

Whereas Chicago is a world-class city with remarkable diversity,

culture, history, and people;

Whereas the citizens of Chicago take great pride in all aspects

of their city and have a deep love for sports;

Whereas Chicago already holds a place in the international community as a city of immigrants from around the world, who are

eager to be ambassadors to visiting Olympic athletes;

Whereas the Olympic and Paralympic Games will be played in

the heart of Chicago so that athletes and visitors can appreciate

the beauty of the downtown parks and lakefront;

Whereas Chicago is one of the transportation hubs of the world

and can provide accessible transportation to international visitors

through extensive rail, transit, and motorways infrastructure,

combined with the world-class O’Hare and Midway International

Airports;

Whereas the motto of the 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games

in Chicago would be ‘‘Stir the Soul,’’ and the games would inspire

citizens around the world, both young and old;

Whereas a Midwestern city has not hosted the Olympic Games

since the 1904 games in St. Louis, Missouri, and the opportunity

to host the Olympics would be an achievement not only for

Chicago and for the State of Illinois, but also for the entire

Midwest;

Whereas hosting the 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games would

provide substantial local, regional, and national economic benefits;

Whereas Mayor Richard M. Daley, Patrick Ryan, and members

of the Chicago 2016 Committee have campaigned tirelessly to

secure Chicago’s bid to host the Olympic and Paralympic Games;

Whereas through the campaign to be selected by the United States

Olympic Committee, Chicago’s citizens, officials, workers, community groups, and businesses have demonstrated their ability to

come together to exemplify the true spirit of the Olympic Games

and the City of Chicago; and

Whereas the Olympic and Paralympic Games represent the best

of the human spirit and there is no better fit for hosting this

event than one of the world’s truly great cities: Now, therefore,

be it

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That Congress—
S. Con. Res. 28—2

(1) congratulates the City of Chicago on securing the bid

to represent the United States in the international competition

to host the 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games; and

(2) encourages the International Olympic Committee to

select Chicago as the site of the 2016 Olympic and Paralympic

Games.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1027

PIETER M. VAN DER SPUY,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FRED W. RAUSCH, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

DEERFIELD HOLDING COMPANY, INCORPORATED; CECIL

P. JONES; DEBORAH L. GARDNER,

Defendants.

No. 98-1182

PIETER M. VAN DER SPUY,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FRED W. RAUSCH, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant,
2

and

DEERFIELD HOLDING COMPANY, INCORPORATED; CECIL

P. JONES; DEBORAH L. GARDNER,

Defendants.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CA-96-1233-2)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 12, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fred W. Rausch, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Gerard Test,

Michelle Ann Hughes, CLARK & STANT, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Rausch appeals the district

court’s order entering a judgment against him and in favor of the

Appellee for federal common law fraud, Virginia common law fraud,

federal mail fraud, and breach of contract. We find that the district court had subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331

(1994). Further, we have reviewed the record and the district

court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm.

Furthermore, we grant Rausch’s motion to file a supplemental reply

brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
(80 South. 132)

#### KREUTNER v. STATE.

(3 Div. 314.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 26, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; A. B. Foster, Judge.

Henry Kreutner was convicted of crime, and he appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

Goodwyn & McIntyre,' of Montgomery, for appellant.

F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMFORD, J.

Reversed and remanded on authority of Henry Kreutner v. State, 80 South. 125 in Supreme Court.
§ 4281.45 Notice of insolvency benefit level. ( a ) *Requirement of notice.* The plan sponsor of an insolvent plan must file with PBGC a notice of insolvency benefit level containing the information described in § 4281.46(a) and issue to plan payees (which, for purposes of this section, means participants and beneficiaries in pay status or reasonably expected to enter pay status during the insolvency year) a notice of insolvency benefit level containing the information described in § 4281.46(b) in each of the following circumstances— ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, for the initial insolvency year and for any insolvency year following the initial insolvency year, if there is a change in insolvency benefit level that affects plan payees generally, provide the notices of insolvency benefit level to PBGC and to plan payees.
( 2 ) For any insolvency year following the initial insolvency year, if there is a change in the insolvency benefit level that affects only one plan payee or a class of plan payees but not plan payees generally (treating commencement of a person's benefits for this purpose as a change in the insolvency benefit level for that person), provide the notices of insolvency benefit level to PBGC and to each affected plan payee.
( b ) *Combined notices.* The plan sponsor may combine a notice of insolvency benefit level under this section and a notice of insolvency under § 4281.43 for the same plan year.
( c ) *When to provide notice.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the plan sponsor must provide the notices under this section by the later of— ( i ) Ninety (90) days before the beginning of the insolvency year; or
( ii ) Thirty (30) days after the date the insolvency determination is made.
( 2 ) The plan sponsor may deliver the notices required under this section to participants and beneficiaries in pay status or reasonably expected to enter pay status during the insolvency year for which the notice is given concurrently with the first benefit payment made after the date the insolvency determination is made.
( d ) *Method of issuance to participants and beneficiaries.* The issuance of the notice of insolvency benefit level to participants and beneficiaries in pay status or reasonably expected to enter pay status during the insolvency year for which the notice is given must be made by a method permitted under the rules in subpart B of part 4000 of this chapter.
[84 FR 18726, May 2, 2019]
#### § 553.233 “Regular rate” defined.

The rules for computing an employee's “regular rate”, for purposes of the Act's overtime pay requirements, are set forth in part 778 of this title. These rules are applicable to employees for whom the section 7(k) exemption is claimed when overtime compensation is provided in cash wages. However, wherever the word “workweek” is used in part 778, the words “work period” should be substituted.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
 
 **302 CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, R.H. Wollenberg, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Longview Fibre Company;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrant 's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 
 R. H. WOLLENBERG1/13/05
 R. H. WOLLENBERG,
 President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
§ 4010.3 Filing requirement. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in § 4010.8(c) (relating to exempt plans) and except where one or more waivers under § 4010.11 apply, each filer must submit to PBGC annually, on or before the due date specified in § 4010.10, all information specified in § 4010.6(a) with respect to all members of a controlled group and all plans maintained by members of the filer's controlled group. Under § 4000.3(b) of this chapter, except as otherwise provided by PBGC, the information must be submitted electronically in accordance with the instructions on PBGC's Web site, *http://www.pbgc.gov .*
( b ) *Single controlled group submission.* Any filer or other person may submit the information specified in § 4010.6(a) on behalf of one or more members of a filer's controlled group.
[70 FR 11544, Mar. 9, 2005, as amended at 74 FR 11029, Mar. 16, 2009]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 97 (Thursday, May 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31619-31620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12555]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Experts' Meeting on High-Burnup Fuel Behavior Under Postulated 
Accident Conditions

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a meeting to 
further develop a Phenomena Identification and Ranking Table (PIRT) for 
fuel rod response to loss of coolant accidents (LOCAs). PIRTs have been 
used at NRC since 1988, and they provide a structured way to obtain a 
technical understanding that is needed to address certain issues. About 
twenty of the world's best technical experts are participating in this 
activity, and the experts represent a balance between industry, 
universities, foreign researchers, and regulatory organizations. The 
current PIRT activity is addressing postulated LOCAs in a BWR and a 
PWR.

DATES: May 31-June 2, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Room T10A1 (TWFN) of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting agenda will be posted on the NRC 
Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/RES/meetings.htm by May 25, 2000. The 
meeting is open to the public. Attendees will need to obtain a visitor 
badge at the TWFN building lobby.

[[Page 31620]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Ralph Meyer, SMSAB, Division of 
Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness, Office of Nuclear 
Regulatory Research, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone (301) 415-
6789.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day of May 2000.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Charles E. Rossi,
Director, Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness, 
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. 00-12555 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DESIGN VALUE REPORT Nov. 22, 2011 Report Request ID: 931252 Report Code: AMP480

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID: HXN

State County City

Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date 42 42 041

043 0101

0401 88101

88101 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

SELECTED OPTIONS

USER SITE METADATA MERGE PDF FILES QUARTERLY DATA IN WORKFILE WORKFILE DELIMITER SINGLE EVENT PROCESSING Option Type Option Value STREET ADDRESS YES NO

, EXCLUDE REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENTS GLOBAL DATES

2010 Start Date End Date 2010 Tribal Code

APPLICABLE STANDARDS Standard Description PM25 24-hour 2006 PM25 Annual 2006UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT Report Date: Nov. 22, 2011

Notes: 1. Warning: Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 2. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*'). Page 1 of 2UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT Report Date: Nov. 22, 2011

Notes: 1. Warning: Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 2. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*'). Page 2 of 2 

### Pollutant: Standard Units: NAAQS Standard: Statistic: Statistic: Site-LevelPM2.5 - Local Conditions(88101) Micrograms/cubic meter (LC)(105) PM25 24-hour 2006 / PM25 Annual 2006 Annual Weighted Mean Annual 98th Percentile Level: Level: Design Value Year: 2010

REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS. 15 35 State Name: Pennsylvania Site_ID / STREET ADDRESS | | | Cred. Days Comp. Qrtrs Wtd.

Mean 98th Perctil Cert. | | | Cred. Days Comp. Qrtrs 98th Perctil Wtd.

Mean Cert. |

| | Cred. Days Comp. Qrtrs 98th Perctil Wtd.

Mean Cert. |

| | Design Value Valid

Ind. | | | Design Value Valid

Ind. 24-Hour Annual 2010 2009 2008

42-041-0101 42-043-0401 IMPERIAL COURT 1833 UPS DRIVE HARRISBURG PA 365 360 4

4 31.4 32.9 10.6

12.0 N

N 365 340 4

4 29.9 33.0 11.1

12.2 N

N 355 347 4

4 33.7 34.3 13.0

13.2 Y

Y 32

33 Y Y 11.6 12.4 Y

Y
#### § 779.345 Exemption provided in section 13(a)(4).

The section 13(a)(4) exemption (see § 779.301) exempts any employee employed by a retail establishment which meets the requirements for exemption under section 13(a)(2), even though the establishment makes or processes on its own premises the goods that it sells, provided, that more than 85 percent of such establishment's annual dollar volume of sales of the goods so made or processed is made within the State in which the establishment is located, and other prescribed tests are met.
Exhibit 99


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust VI (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding VI, L.P. (the
"Partnership") for the period ended March 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John C. Stomber,
Regular Trustee of the Trust and Treasurer of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the
General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust
    and the Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST VI


                              By:  /s/ JOHN C. STOMBER
                              --------------------------------------------
                              Name:    John C. Stomber *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee




                               MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING VI, L.P.


                               By: MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner



                               By:  /s/ JOHN C. STOMBER
                               --------------------------------------------
                               Name:    John C. Stomber *
                               Title:   Treasurer


Dated: May 8, 2003
_______________________

*  John C. Stomber functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of each of the Trust and the Partnership
   for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
# Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA

- 2014

- 0625

Directorate Identifier: 2014NM044AD

605

- 24

- 007

--- 9/18/12

604

- 24

- 026

--- 9/18/12

601

- 0625

--- 9/18/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket



### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### § 502.0 Introduction.

These regulations cover the enforcement of all contractual obligation provisions applicable to the employment of H-2A workers under sec. 218 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), as amended by the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA). These regulations are also applicable to the employment of United States (U.S.) workers newly hired by employers of H-2A workers in the same occupations as the H-2A workers during the period of time set forth in the labor certification approved by ETA as a condition for granting H-2A certification, including any extension thereof. Such U.S. workers hired by H-2A employers are hereafter referred to as engaged in corresponding employment.