alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 I, Thomas
Flottmann, Chief Executive Officer of Manas Petroleum Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 (1)           the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:  August
13, 2008
 
 
 /s/ Thomas
Flottmann_________________________________
 Thomas
Flottmann
 Chief
Executive Officer
ATTACHMENT A 

PROPOSED STAFF’S MODIFICATIONS TO ORIGINAL PROPOSAL

(Document made available at the March 27, 2008 Board Hearing) 

• Requirement for the 2009-2011 Model Years. A large volume manufacturer 

electing to be subject to the alternative compliance requirements during model years 

2009 through 2011 must produce, deliver for sale, and place in service in California 

enough 2009-2011 model-year Type III ZEVs to generate ZEV credits sufficient to 

meet a cumulative percentage ZEV requirement of 0.84 percent of the 

manufacturer’s average annual California sales of PCs, LDT1s, and 68 percent of 

LDT2s over the three year period from model years 2003 through 2005, or submit an 

equivalent number of credits generated by such vehicles. The manufacturer may 

meet this requirement with [i] 2009-2011 model-year Type I, I.5, II, III,or IV ZEVs, 

provided that 2 Type I ZEVs or 1.6 Type I.5 ZEVs, or 1.33 Type II ZEVs or 0.8 Type 

IV ZEVs will equal one Type III ZEV and [ii] 1997-2003 model-year ZEVs that qualify 

for an extended service multiplier under section 1962.1(f) for a year primarily during 

calendar years 2009-2011, provided that 33 years of such a multiplier will equal one 

Type III ZEV. Manufacturers may elect, on an annual basis, to determine their 

alternative requirement using either the prior 4th, 5th, and 6th model years method 

or the current year method. 

• ZEV credits generated from production by an intermediate volume manufacturer 

prior to being subject to large volume manufacturer requirements may carried 

forward and applied to the first three years of meeting ZEV requirements as a large 

volume manufacturer. 

• The value of ZEV credits generated in any state that is administering the California 

ZEV requirements pursuant to section 177 of the Clean Air Act shall be multiplied by 

the ratio of total large volume manufacturer sales in such state for the subject model 

year to total large volume manufacturer sales in California for the same model year. 

• ZEV credits for advanced technology demonstration projects may be earned for up 

to 25 vehicles in a demonstration program.
#### §§ 4907.131-4907.139 [Reserved]
#### § 503.56 Retention of official record.

The official record of every completed administrative hearing provided by the regulations in this part will be maintained and filed under the custody and control of the Chief ALJ, or, where the case has been the subject of administrative review, the ARB.
#### Peter Mead *against*Benjamin Crane.

Warranty. *(b)****0113111*-

THE action was founded on an express warranty, in the sale of a horse. A rule was served on the justice, certify certain matters; and in his reply to the rule, he says, there was no proof, that *Mead,*warranted the .horse to be sound at the time of the sale ; or that he knew he was unsound; that the defendant moved for a nonsuit, because there w7as no evidence to prove the warranty; but he overruled the motion, *“*and let the cause go to the jury, as, in his opinion, it would prevent any further litigation between the parties, *&c.”*The judgment was reversed for the error of the justice.

(b)

 See *Beninger vs. Corwin, 4 Zab. 257. Smalley vs. Hendrickson, 5 Dutch. 371. Wolcott vs.*Mount, *7 Vr. 262. Renton vs. Maryott, 6 C. E. Gr. 123.*
Promulgation: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 

Meeting Documentation for Telephone Call on April 20, 2010 with 3M Representatives RegardiProduction Re-Proposal RuleDates: April 20, 2010 Staff Contact Information (Name, email, phone #): Deborah Ottinger, EPA, 202-343-9149, Ottinger.deborah@epa.gov; Karen Schaffner, RTI, ksschaffner@rti.org

Name of Organization (Attach list of all attendees names and emails if possible):Dana Schnobrich, 3M 

Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, reporting requirements, etc.): The purpose of the call was to discuss their public comments regarding emission estimation techniques available to calcula

emissions along with other concerns regarding the reporting rule. 3M representative expressed approval that the options were expanded in the re-proposed rule, but anticipates submitting a f

comments on the details, particularly the batch process tesing issues. 3M also plans to comment on the overlap of the funda

and L and on compounds not being listed in Table A-1 and what GWPs would be used for these. 

3M representative had concerns about whether scrubbers would be considered destruction devices and facilities are obligat

emissions are not vented to thermal oxidizer, the emissions are sent to backup scrubbers where HF is removed, and the F GThere may be some compounds that meet the definition of a F GHG based on vapor pressure, and these compounds may be 

so are removed. 3M noted that multiple compounds emitted from fluoroelastomers and fluoropolymers processes are not included in Table emitted at levels greater than 1 mt F GHG and there is no GWP available, these processes will be required to conduct emis

3M noted that speciating and quantifying every component of a stream is difficult. It is relatively straightforward to identif

greater than 1 percent, however then you get to the “cats and dogs” of the stream, i.e., small relative concentration and mulThese small components often do not have GWPs, so difficult to determine the CO2e. 

3M would like EPA to develop an approval process for GWPs that are published in literature. 

Written Comments Provided? No. Did they also submit to Docket? No. 
Date sent to EPA- CCD 

None
§ 4063.1 Cross-references. ( a ) Part 4062 of this chapter sets forth rules for determination and payment of the liability incurred, under section 4062(b) of ERISA, upon termination of any single-employer plan and, to the extent appropriate, determination of the liability incurred with respect to multiple employer plans under sections 4063 and 4064 of ERISA. Part 4062 also sets forth rules for determining the amount of liability incurred under section 4063 of ERISA pursuant to the occurrence of a cessation of operations as described by section 4062(e) of ERISA.
( b ) Part 4068 of this chapter includes rules regarding the PBGC's lien under section 4068 of ERISA with respect to liability arising under section 4062, 4063, or 4064.
[61 FR 34082, July 1, 1996, as amended at 71 FR 34822, June 16, 2006]
#### In the Matter of Max G. Neuhauser, Appellant, against Fiorello H. LaGuardia et al., Constituting the Board of Estimate and Apportionment of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Argued September 28, 1937;

decided October 12, 1937.

*559
      *Alfred J. Talley*for appellant.

*Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel (Paxton Blair*and *Jeremiah M. Evarts*of counsel), for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O'Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Bippey, JJ.
Protect the environment | Learn new skills | Earn service credit

Make a Difference! Join the Earth Team! 

The USDA Natural Resources Conservation 

Service (NRCS) is looking for motivated 

volunteers, ages 14 and up, to help in county 

field offices over the summer. 

The Earth Team provides a variety of 

opportunities: full- or part-time; outdoor or 

indoor activities; and as an individual or part of 

a group. There is something for everyone.

Gain valuable work experience while helping 

protect America’s natural resources!

What will I be doing?

As an Earth Team volunteer, you will be 

working side by side with professional 

conservationists to plan and deliver 

conservation on private lands.

Duties vary based on interests and availability, 

and include clerical work and field study.

You will share your skills, learn new ones, 

meet new people and be part of a dedicated, 

national conservation effort.

The Earth Team will provide you with 

experience in a variety of different natural 

resource fields including: conservation, soil 

quality, water quality, tree planting, brush 

management and more. 

Where will Earth Team take you?

Several NRCS employees began their careers 

as Earth Team volunteers. Join today and gain 

valuable knowledge and workplace experience 

that will help build your resume.

If you’re considering a career in natural 

resources, consider joining the Earth Team 

to kick start your career!

What is the Earth Team?

The Earth Team is a component of the USDA’s 

Natural Resources Conservation Service, the 

federal government’s primary private lands 

conservation agency. 

Earth Team volunteers help the agency fulfill 

its commitment to support farmers and 

ranchers in their voluntary conservation efforts 

to keep working lands working, boost rural 

economies, and increase the competitiveness 

of American agriculture.

The Earth Team offers numerous volunteer 

opportunities for students, retirees, veterans 

and others who care about conservation 

and are seeking to make a difference in their 

communities.

With nearly 3,000 offices in communities 

nationwide, volunteers are needed in virtually 

every State and territory.

Contact

For more information on the Earth Team, visit: 

www.nrcs.usda.gov/earthteam.

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Become an 

Earth Team 

Volunteer

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
Exhibit 99


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust VI (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch  Preferred  Funding VI, L.P.
(the "Partnership")  for the period ended September 27, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I,
John C. Stomber, Regular  Trustee of the Trust and Senior Vice President and
Treasurer of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General Partner of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust
    and the Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST VI


                              By:  /s/ JOHN C. STOMBER
                              --------------------------------------------
                              Name:    John C. Stomber *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee




                               MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING VI, L.P.


                               By: MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner



                               By:  /s/ JOHN C. STOMBER
                               --------------------------------------------
                               Name:    John C. Stomber *
                               Title:   Senior Vice President and Treasurer


Dated: November 7, 2002
_______________________

*  John C. Stomber functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of each of the Trust and the Partnership
   for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000588 10-NOV-2016 08:34 AM
#### Ian Stumpf, by Bradley Stumpf, His Father and Natural Guardian, Appellant, v Ralph Brinks et al., Respondents.

[697 NYS2d 880]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries sustained while riding on the fender of a tractor driven by defendant Nathan Green on the farm of defendant Ralph Brinks. The end of plaintiff’s left index finger was amputated by debris as plaintiff held the fender to steady himself. A fair interpretation of the evidence supports the jury verdict of no cause of action *(see, Riggio v New Creation Fellowship of Buffalo,*249 AD2d 942). It is uncontroverted here that plaintiff grasped the fender in an area offset from the tire and that Green was driving carefully. The issue of foreseeability is generally one for the jury *(see, Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Corp.,*51 NY2d 308, 315, *rearg denied*52 NY2d 784), and the jury could have reasonably concluded that the risk of injury to plaintiff’s hand was not reasonably foreseeable. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County, Nenno, J. — Negligence.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Callahan, JJ.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > The Woman Wage Earner: Her Situation Today

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Benham, Elisabeth D. (Elisabeth Dewel). 						*The Woman Wage Earner: Her Situation Today : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 172*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1939,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5445,			accessed on September 5, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 27, 2024

NO. 03

- 23

- 00114

- CR

Francisco Esquivel, III , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY
BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs

is made.
#### § 530.5 Investigation.

An investigation may be ordered in any case to obtain additional data or facts. A medical examination of the worker or invalid may be ordered or a certification of facts concerning eligibility for the certificate by designated officers of the State or Federal Government may be required.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Q WASHINGTON, D .C. 20460 02 

# FEB4

. - 2011

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION Katherine L. Adams Senior Vice President and General Counsel Honeywell 101 Columbia Road P.O . Box 3000 Morristown, New

Jersey 07962-3000 Dear Ms. Adams: Thank you for meeting with Administrator Jackson and members of my staffon December 20, 2010, to discuss Honeywell's new, low-global warming potential (GWP) refrigerant for use in motor vehicle air conditioning. The matter you raised inyour December 1 letter comes underthejurisdiction my office and, therefore, I am writing to respond. As was discussed at the meeting, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is moving forward with our reviews and rulemakings for HFO-1234yf. On December 17, 2010, we submitted the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program final rule to the Office of Management and Budget for interagency review . While the review

process is still underway, EPAstaffis doing everything possible to facilitate discussions and resolve any issues that may be identified. Our SNAP programoffers a menu ofoptions for alternatives in eight industrial sectors, including refrigeration and air conditioning. Substances such as HFO-1234yf (with a GWPof only 4) could provide additional options that are better for the ozone layer and the climate system . We believe that these and similar innovative solutions can help us reduce environmental damage while still supporting cost-effective solutions for consumer end-uses. EPArecognizes the important role alternative refrigerants will play in reducing overall emissions ofgreenhouse gases frommotor vehicles. The Light Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards are a priority for this Administration, providing a reasonable, affordable approach to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and to protect the climate system . This rule allows motor vehicle manufacturers additional flexibility to meet the emission standards by using alternative refrigerants. We understand that the automotive industry considers HFO-1234yf a viable tool for implementing those provisions.

Internet Address (URL) * http://www .epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable e Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100%Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled PaperAgain, thank you for your letter and we will keep you informed of progress on these

actions. Please contact Drusilla Hufford, Director ofthe Stratospheric Protection Division, at (202)-343-9101 ifyou have specific questions.

Assistant Administrator ina McCarthy
cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge DeAnn Justine Wiesner Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(0) )947A cier
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0604

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

BOBBY FRANCIS LOWRY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 4, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 24 2024

09/24/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0604
Exhibit 32.2

     Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 1350

     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Visual Bible International, Inc. (the "Company")for the period
ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Date: November 24, 2004            /s/Maurice Colson


                                   Maurice Colson, Principal
                                   Executive Officer



     The foregoing certification accompanied the Quarterly Report on
Form 10QSB filing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is being
reproduced herein for information only.  It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company, whether made before or after hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.  A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of

HORIZON BANCORPORATION, INC.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc., hereby certifies that:

1. Horizon Bancorporation, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc.'

/S/ Kathleen M. Jepson
Kathleen M. Jepson, 
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 6, 2005
#### § 779.113 Warehouse and stock room employees.

Warehouse and stock room employees of retail businesses who regularly and recurrently engage in the loading or unloading of goods moving in commerce, or who regularly and recurrently handle, pack or otherwise work on goods that are destined to out-of-State points are engaged in covered activities.
### Adams, Kevin (OST)

From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject: Attachments: fordJrank@gmail.com on behalf of Frank Ford-Pacific Wings <fford@pacificwings
. com> Friday, November 15, 2013 3:40 PM Adams, Kevin (OSn Devany, Dennis (OSn; Greg Re: MUE Hold in request MUE HOLD IN COMP 2013.pdf 

### Dennis & 

### Kevin: Attached is our hold in calculation for subsidy for Kamuela (MUE), Hawaii. Per my previous ~riiaill~a'

-.- ;· various dockets, our hold in commenced 06/12/2013 (90 days after notice) until 09/2112013 

# when Mokulele began service. The calculations are in line with our CNM bid and costs structure etc ... Please let me know if you have any questions and thanks in advance for expediting this matter. Frank

'\



# .,

### Pacific Wings, L.L.C. Provision for Essential Air Service at KAMUELA (MUE), HAWAII KAHULUI (OGG) Service Calculation of Annual Subsidy Needed 2 rountrips M-F, 1 roundtrip Saturday, 1 roundtrip Sunday

Aircraft type Cessna 208B Seats per departure 9 Average completion factor: 98.0% Departures 1,223 Block hours: 775

OGG - MUE Other revenue Total operating revenue Passengers 1,000 Average fare

$88.10
Operating expense : Flying Operations Fuel and Oil Aircraft and Hull Insurance Maintenance Into aircraft and lease expense Direct Expense Indirects Total Operating Expense Return at 5% of operating expense Total Economic Cost Annual Subsidy Need 

### @ 98% Appendix

Total $88,100 441 $88 ,541 $116,189 $224,244 $82,000 $104,570 $152,076 $679,079 $182 ,556 $861 , 635 43,082 $904, 717 $816

. 177