alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. GA ST ON ORTI Z- ORTI Z, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 10- 50547 D . C . N o. 3: 08 -c r- 03 26 3-L ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M . J a m e s L or e nz , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r27, 2011 ** B e f o r e : S I L V E R M A N , W . F L E T C H E R , an dM U R G U I A , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . G a s t on O rt i z - O rt i z appe a l s f r om the 77- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d upon r e m a nd f ol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on f orbe i ng ade port e d a l i e n f ound i n the U ni t e d S t a t e s , i n vi ol a t i on of 8 U . S . C . § 1326. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED OC T 05 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 50547 2 O rt i z- O rt i z c on t ends thatthe di stri ctcourterre d b y i m po si ng a 16-l evel e nhanc e m e nt , pur s uantt o U . S . S . G . § 2L 1. 2( b) ( 1) ( A ) ( i i ) , be c aus e none of hi s pr i or c o n v ic tio n s c o n s titu te s ac r im e o f v io le n c e . P r i ort o c om m i tt i ng the i ns t antof f e ns e , O rt i z - O rt i z s uf

f e r e d ac onvi c t i on u n d e rC a lif

o rn iaP e n a l C o d e § 4 2 2 , f o rm a k in g c r im in a l th r e a ts . T h is c o n v ic tio n is c a te g o r ic a llyac o n v ic tio n f o rac r im e o f

v io le n c e u n d e rU .S .S .G . § 2 L 1 .2 . See U ni ted States v. V

i l lavi ce nci o-B urruel , 60 8 F . 3d 55 6, 56 3 (9th C i r. 20 10 ). O rt i zO rt i z’ s co l l at eral ch al l en g es t o h i s sect i o n 4 2 2 co n v i ct i o n are u n av ai l i n g b ecau se h e w a s r e p r e s e n te db yc o u n s e l in th a t p r o c e e d in g . See Cust is v . U ni ted States , 511 U . S . 485, 496- 97 ( 1994) ( de f e ndanti n f

e de r a l s e nt e nc i ng pr oc e e di ng c annot col l at er al l y att ac k v al i di ty of pri or st at e c on vi ct i on used t o enh ance se nt ence e x c e p t w h e r e th e r e w a s a“f a ilu r e to ap p o in t c o u n s e l a t a ll” ) . AF F I RME D.
RHODE ISLAND 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

235 Promenade Street, Providence, RI 02908 -5767 TDD 401 -831 -5508 

28 August 2015 

Mr. David B. Conroy 

USEPA, Region 1 

5 Post Office Square — Suite 100 

Boston, MA 02109-3912 

Dear Mr. Conroy: 

The Office of Air Resources is hereby submitting the enclosed, revised Air Pollution Control 

Regulation 8, entitled "Sulfur Content of Fuels" as a revision to the Rhode Island State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). 

In this revised regulation, all provisions of the regulation related to Section 8.7 "Fuel Supply 

Shortages" have been stricken and will not be part of the requested SIP revision. 

The version of Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 8 previously submitted on 26 June 2014 

should be withdrawn. 

If you should have any questions, feel free to contact me at 401-222-2808, ext 7011. 

Sincerely, 

Douglas McVay, ef 

Office of Air Resources 

Enclosure 

cc: Anne Arnold, EPA Region 1 w/o enclosures 

‘1 4: 30% post-consumer fiber
§ 516.16 Commission employees of a retail or service establishment exempt from overtime pay requirements pursuant to section 7(i) of the Act. With respect to each employee of a retail or service establishment exempt from the overtime pay requirements of the Act pursuant to the provisions of section 7(i), employers shall maintain and preserve payroll and other records containing all the information and data required by § 516.2(a) except paragraphs (a) (6), (8), (9), and (11), and in addition: ( a ) A symbol, letter or other notation placed on the payroll records identifying each employee who is paid pursuant to section 7(i).
( b ) A copy of the agreement or understanding under which section 7(i) is utilized or, if such agreement or understanding is not in writing, a memorandum summarizing its terms including the basis of compensation, the applicable representative period and the date the agreement was entered into and how long it remains in effect. Such agreements or understandings, or summaries may be individually or collectively drawn up.
( c ) Total compensation paid to each employee each pay period (showing separately the amount of commissions and the amount of noncommission straight-time earnings).
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 16

- 00267

- CR

ROBERT THOMAS BRUCE

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 52nd District Court

Coryell County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 23163

ORDER

Appellant’s third motion for extension of time , filed on May 30, 2017, is denied.

Appellant’s brief is due Ju ly 5 , 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion denied

Order issued and filed June 14 , 2017
#### § 508.1 Cross-reference.

Regulations governing attestations by employers using F-1 students in off-campus work are found at 20 CFR part 655, subparts J and K.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 16 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 281
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 16

 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
                   Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 14, 2007

Mr. McConnell (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. McCain, Mr. Alexander, 
   Mr. Allard, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Biden, Mr. Bingaman, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. 
    Brown, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Bunning, Mr. Burr, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. 
  Chambliss, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Coleman, Ms. 
 Collins, Mr. Cornyn, Mrs. Dole, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Ensign, 
 Mr. Feingold, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Harkin, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. 
   Kerry, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Kohl, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. 
     Leahy, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Lott, Mr. Lugar, Mr. Martinez, Mrs. 
McCaskill, Mr. Menendez, Ms. Mikulski, Ms. Murkowski, Mrs. Murray, Mr. 
Obama, Mr. Reid, Mr. Salazar, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Smith, Ms. 
    Snowe, Mr. Specter, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Sununu, Mr. 
    Voinovich, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Kyl, and Mr. Tester) 
  introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

                             July 24, 2007

               Reported by Mr. Baucus, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
                   Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress approves the 
renewal of the import restrictions contained in section 3(a)(1) of the 
Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

                                                       Calendar No. 281

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 16

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
                   Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 24, 2007

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### § 570.12 Revoked certificates of age.

A certificate which has been revoked as proof of age under the Act shall be of no force and effect under the Act after notice of such revocation.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Robert Kinloch, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Maverick Minerals Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         
 the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2)         
 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 22, 2008



/s/ Robert KinlochRobert
Kinloch Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

#### § 4.189 Administrative proceedings relating to enforcement of labor standards.

The Secretary is authorized pursuant to the provisions of section 4(a) of the Act to hold hearings and make decisions based upon findings of fact as are deemed to be necessary to enforce the provisions of the Act. Pursuant to section 4(a) of the Act, the Secretary's findings of fact after notice and hearing are conclusive upon all agencies of the United States and, if supported by the preponderance of the evidence, conclusive in any court of the United States, without a trial de novo. *United States* v. *Powers Building Maintenance Co.,* 336 F. Supp. 819 (W.D. Okla. 1972). Rules of practice for administrative proceedings are set forth in parts 6 and 8 of this title.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-1640

___________ Nancy Barton, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner * [UNPUBLISHED] of Social Security, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: September 11, 2003 Filed: October 6, 2003

___________ Before MELLOY, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Nancy Barton sought supplemental security income (SSI) benefits asserting she was disabled beginning January 1, 1989, by arthritis, degenerative disc disease, anxiety with panic attacks, and severe neck, back, and hip pain. An administrative law judge (ALJ) decided Barton was not disabled b ecause she had the residual functional capacity to perform a significant range of light work and there were a significant number of jobs in the national economy she could perform. While Barton’s case was pending before the Appeals Council, she filed a new application for benefits and another ALJ found Barton was disabled beginning March 8, 2000.* The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. -2- The Appeals Council in the earlier action found the later claim reflected a deterioration in Barton’s mental condition and concluded substantial evidence supported the earlier ALJ’s decision to deny benefits beginning January 1, 1989. Barton sought judicial review, and the district court * affirmed the Commissioner’s decision to deny benefits based on a magistrate judge’s fifty-page report and recommendation. On appeal, Barton contends the ALJ improperly assessed her residual functional capacity because he failed to provide medical grounds for his decision, failed to incorporate Barton’s mental limitations, and posed an incomplete hypothetical question. Barton also contends the ALJ improperly discounted the opinion of her treating psychiatrist. Having carefully reviewed Barton’s contentions, the record, and the applicable law, we conclude substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s decision to deny benefits. Because we have nothing to add to the magistrate judge’s analysis as amended by the district court, we affirm without additional discussion. See 8 th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
IIA 

Calendar No. 78 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 5 

Proclaiming Casimir Pulaski to be an honorary citizen of the United States 

posthumously. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 5, 2007 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. OBAMA, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. 

CARPER, Mr. CASEY, Mr. PRYOR, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. KERRY, and Mr. 

CARDIN) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

MARCH 15, 2007 

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proclaiming Casimir Pulaski to be an honorary citizen of 

the United States posthumously. 

Whereas Casimir Pulaski was a Polish military officer who 

fought on the side of the American colonists against the 

British in the American Revolutionary War; 

Whereas Benjamin Franklin recommended that General 

George Washington accept Casimir Pulaski as a volunteer in the American Cavalry and said that Pulaski was 

‘‘renowned throughout Europe for the courage and bravery he displayed in defense of his country’s freedom’’; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

SJ 5 RS 

Whereas, after arriving in America, Casimir Pulaski wrote to 

General Washington, ‘‘I came here, where freedom is 

being defended, to serve it, and to live or die for it.’’; 

Whereas the first military engagement of Casimir Pulaski 

with the British was on September 11, 1777, at the Battle of Brandywine, and his courageous charge in this engagement averted a disastrous defeat of the American 

Cavalry and saved the life of George Washington; 

Whereas, on September 15, 1777, George Washington elevated Casimir Pulaski to the rank of Brigadier General 

of the American Cavalry; 

Whereas Casimir Pulaski formed the Pulaski Cavalry Legion, 

and in February 1779, this legion ejected the British occupiers from Charleston, South Carolina; 

Whereas, in October 1779, Casimir Pulaski mounted an assault against British forces in Savannah, Georgia; 

Whereas, on the morning of October 9, 1779, Casimir Pulaski was mortally wounded and was taken aboard the 

American ship USS Wasp, where he died at sea on October 11, 1779; 

Whereas, before the end of 1779, the Continental Congress 

resolved that a monument should be erected in honor of 

Casimir Pulaski; 

Whereas, in 1825, General Lafayette laid the cornerstone for 

the Casimir Pulaski monument in Savannah, Georgia; 

and 

Whereas, in 1929, Congress passed a resolution recognizing 

October 11 of each year as Pulaski Day in the United 

States: Now, therefore, be it 


bajohnson on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
3 

SJ 5 RS 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Casimir Pulaski is proclaimed to be an honorary cit4 izen of the United States posthumously. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
Calendar No. 78 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 5 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proclaiming Casimir Pulaski to be an honorary 

citizen of the United States posthumously. 

MARCH 15, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


bajohnson on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
§ 516.9 Petitions for exceptions. ( a ) *Submission of petitions for relief.* Any employer or group of employers who, due to peculiar conditions under which they must operate, desire authority to maintain records in a manner other than required in this part, or to be relieved of preserving certain records for the period specified in this part, may submit a written petition to the Administrator requesting such authority, setting forth the reasons therefor.
( b ) *Action on petitions.* If, after review of the petition, the Administrator finds that the authority requested will not hinder enforcement of the Act, the Administrator may grant such authority limited by any conditions determined necessary and subject to subsequent revocation. Prior to revocation of such authority because of noncompliance with any of the prescribed conditions, the employer will be notified of the reasons and given an opportunity to come into compliance.
( c ) *Compliance after submission of petitions.* The submission of a petition or the delay of the Administrator in acting upon such petition will not relieve any employer or group of employers from any obligations to comply with all the applicable requirements of the regulations in this part. However, the Administrator will provide a response to all petitions as soon as possible.
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: 2-15-12 Meeting with ReCommunity

FROM: Marc Thomas

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

On February 15, 2012, EPA met with representatives from ReCommunity to discuss a 

reengineered feedstock the company had developed. During the meeting, ReCommunity

provided information as to why they believed this material constituted a non-waste fuel pursuant 

to the Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials (NHSM) rulemakings (76 FR 15456 and 76 FR 

80452). EPA asked clarifying questions. Attendees list below.

Meeting Attendees

Robert A. Wyman (Latham & Watkins)

Eli W. L. Hopson (Latham & Watkins)

Lisa Feldt (EPA)

Janet McCabe (EPA) 

Joseph Goffman (EPA)

Jim Berlow (EPA)

Susmita Dubey (EPA)

Peter Tsirigotis (EPA, by phone)
#### § 575.9 Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the waiver.

If the employer or group of employers granted a waiver pursuant to section 13(c)(4) of the Act and this part do not comply with the terms and conditions set forth in the waiver and this part, the waiver shall be null and void and the employer or group of employers will be subject to civil money penalties under section 16(e) of the Act.
§ 502.36 Caption of proceeding. ( a ) Each administrative proceeding instituted under the Act and these regulations shall be captioned in the name of the person requesting such hearing, and shall be styled as follows: In the Matter of __, Respondent.
( b ) For the purposes of such administrative proceedings the Administrator, WHD shall be identified as plaintiff and the person requesting such hearing shall be named as respondent.
Referral for Hearing
HABERN, O'NEIL & ASSOCIATES

(Not a Partnership)

Attorneys and Counselors at Law

P.O. Box 8930, Huntsvillc, Texas 77340

Phone: (936) 435-1380 Facsimile: (Mf>) 435-1089

Website: www.parolclexas.com

Email: treviaf5iparoletexas.com

Appointments also available in Houston

Wm. T. Habern David P. O'Neil P. C. William Savoie Nancy Bunin

Of Counsel '

June 25,2015

Court of Criminal Appeals

Attn: Record Section

P.O. Box 12308 Q0UPJ0FCRIMINALAPPEAUS

Austin, Texas 78711 „„....

JUN29 2015

RE: State ofTexas v. John Lamberton; DOB 7/31/1969

. .-•'• Cause No.: 92CR1006 and 92CR1007

To Whom It May Concern: ": "-

This office has been retained to represent Mr. Lamberton in his upcoming review by the Texas

Board of Pardons and Paroles. In preparation for that presentation, I am attempting to gather information

regarding Mr. Lamberton's past conduct and offense(s) of conviction. Our records indicate that Mr.

Lamberton was charged and convicted in Galveston Countywith the offensesof injuryto a child.

To the extent that the records may exist in this case and are maintained in your office, this request

includes: copy of the trial records in both cases. We do not object to the redaction of identifiable

information regarding the victim.

I have included a release executed by Mr. Lamberton authorizing the release of this information

to our office. Upon being advised of any costs for production and/or mailing of the records related to this

request, we will happily remit the required amount to your offices.

I anticipate that this case will enter the review process and be routed to the Board Office in the

near future, so time is of the essence in this matter. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to

contact our offices. " -: .,; '

Thank you for your kind attention to this matter.

Enclosure

"urvis

Legal Assistant for

David P. O'Neil

RECEIVED IN
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (NAFTA)

              														North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (NAFTA), December 8, 1993.						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1135,			accessed on September 5, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
128 STAT. 1824 PUBLIC LAW 113–151—AUG. 8, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3472 (S. 2056): 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

June 17, considered and passed House. 

Aug. 1, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–151 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 13127 

Broadway Street in Alden, New York, as the ‘‘Sergeant Brett E. Gornewicz Memorial Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SERGEANT BRETT E. GORNEWICZ MEMORIAL POST 

OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 13127 Broadway Street in Alden, New York, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Brett E. Gornewicz 

Memorial Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sergeant Brett E. Gornewicz Memorial Post Office’’. 

Approved August 8, 2014. 

Aug. 8, 2014 

[H.R. 3472] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS