alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 925 

To provide for funding assistance under section 406 of the Robert T. Stafford 

Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5172) to 

a State or local government for the acquisition of real property for 

the purpose of the replacement of certain public facilities based on 

reasonable reliance of cost estimates provided by the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 20, 2007 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for funding assistance under section 406 of the 

Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5172) to a State or local government for the acquisition of real property for the purpose 

of the replacement of certain public facilities based on 

reasonable reliance of cost estimates provided by the 

Federal Emergency Management Agency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 925 IS

1 SECTION 1. ASSISTANCE FOR CERTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES 

2 DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF HURRICANE 

3 KATRINA OR HURRICANE RIT. 

4 The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Man5 agement Agency shall make a contribution of funds under 

6 section 406 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 

7 Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5172) to a State 

8 or local government for the replacement of a public facil9 ity, if— 

10 (1) that facility was damaged as a result of 

11 Hurricane Katrina or Hurricane Rita; 

12 (2) based on a cost estimate provided by the 

13 Federal Emergency Management Agency to that 

14 State or local government, the extent of the damage 

15 would require the replacement of that facility, in16 stead of the repair, restoration, or reconstruction of 

17 that facility; 

18 (3) that State or local government acquired real 

19 property for the purpose of the replacement of that 

20 facility based on reasonable reliance on the cost esti21 mate described under paragraph (2); and 

22 (4) such funds would otherwise be available to 

23 that State or local government for that facility in ac24 cordance with that Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
### NUMBER 13 - 1 6 - 0 0 449 - CR 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

EX PARTE JOSE ISAI CALVILLO R AMOS

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Jose Isai Calvillo Ramos , proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal seeking to challenge an order denying a post

- conviction writ of habeas corpus. On August 15, 2016 , the Clerk of this Co urt notified appellant that it appeared that the order from which the appeal was taken was not an appealable order, and requested correction of this defect within ten days or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has failed to respond to the Court ’ s di rective.2

Jurisdiction to grant post

- conviction habeas corpus relief in felony cases rests exclusively with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 11.07, § 5 ( West, Westlaw through 2015 R.S. ); Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Dist. , 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); In re McAfee , 53 S.W .3d 715, 717

– 18 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). Therefore, we are without jurisdiction to grant the requested relief.
T he appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM
Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).
D elivered and filed the 6th day of October, 2016

.
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 23.1

          Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
          --------------------------------------------------------

The Board of Directors
K-V Pharmaceutical Company:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 2-56793, 2-76173, 33-46400, 33-44927, 333-00199, 333-48252 and
333-85516) on Form S-8 and registration statements (Nos. 333-87402 and
333-106294) on Form S-3 of our reports dated June 14, 2006, with respect to
the consolidated balance sheets of K-V Pharmaceutical Company and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 2006 and 2005, the related consolidated
statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity, and cash
flows for the years then ended, and the related financial statement schedule
for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31,
2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of March 31, 2006, which reports appear in the March 31, 2006 annual report
on Form 10-K of K-V Pharmaceutical Company.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, during
fiscal 2005, the Company adopted the provisions of Emerging Issues Task
Force (EITF) Issue No. 03-6 Participating Securities and the Two-Class
Method under FASB Statement No. 128 and EITF Issue No. 04-8 The Effect of
Contingently Convertible Instruments on Diluted Earnings per Share.



/s/ KPMG LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
June 14, 2006
§ 4000.31 Is my issuance untimely if I miss a few participants or beneficiaries? The PBGC will not treat your issuance as untimely based on your failure to provide the issuance to a participant or beneficiary in a timely manner if— ( a ) The failure resulted from administrative error;
( b ) The failure involved only a *de minimis* percentage of intended recipients; and
( c ) You resend the issuance to the intended recipient promptly after discovering the error.
#### § 452.84 General.

Under the provisions of section 401(e), every member in good standing is entitled to vote in elections required under title IV which are to be held by secret ballot. The phrase “member in good standing” includes any person who has fulfilled the requirements for membership and who neither has withdrawn from membership nor has been expelled or suspended from membership after appropriate proceedings consistent with lawful provisions of the constitution and bylaws of the organization.[43]

###### Footnotes -
  452.84

[43] Act, sec. 3(o).
§ 500.212 Request for hearing. ( a ) Any person desiring to request an administrative hearing on a determination referred to in § 500.210 shall make such request in writing to the official who issued the determination, at the Wage and Hour Division address appearing on the determination notice. Such request must be made no later than thirty (30) days after the date of issuance of the notice referred to in § 500.210.
( b ) The request for such hearing shall be delivered in person or by mail to the Wage and Hour Division office at the address appearing on the determination notice upon which the request for a hearing is based, within the time set forth in paragraph (a) of this section. For the affected person's protection, if the request is by mail, it should be by certified mail.
( c ) No particular form is prescribed for any request for hearing permitted by this part. However, any such request shall: ( 1 ) Be typewritten or legibly written on size 81 ⁄ 2′′ × 11′′ paper;
( 2 ) Specify the issue or issues stated in the notice of determination giving rise to such request;
( 3 ) State the specific reason or reasons why the person requesting the hearing believes such determination is in error;
( 4 ) Be signed by the person making the request or by an authorized representative of such person; and
( 5 ) Include the address at which such person or authorized representative desires to receive further communications relating thereto.
( d ) Civil money penalties under FLCRA shall be treated as follows: ( 1 ) Determinations to assess civil money penalties for violations of FLCRA made prior to April 14, 1983 shall continue until a final administrative determination shall have been made in accordance with 29 CFR part 40.
( 2 ) Determinations to assess civil money penalties for violations of FLCRA arising prior to April 14, 1983, made on or after April 14, 1983, shall continue until a final administrative determination shall have been made in accordance with these regulations.
[48 FR 36741, Aug. 12, 1983, as amended at 54 FR 13329, Mar. 31, 1989; 57 FR 5942, Feb. 18, 1992; 71 FR 16665, Apr. 3, 2006]
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 16 September 2004

in Case C-382/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret): Cimber Air A/S v Skatteministeriet (1)

(Sixth VAT Directive - Article 15(6), (7) and (9) - Exemption of exports outside the Community - Meaning of ‘aircraft used by airlines operating chiefly on international routes’ - Exemption for fuelling and provisioning of domestic flights)

(2004/C 273/06)

Language of the case: Danish

In Case C-382/02: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC, from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark), made by decision of 9 October 2002, received at the Court on 23 October 2002, in the proceedings between Cimber Air A/S and Skatteministeriet — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, J.-P. Puissochet (Rapporteur), J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and N. Colneric, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; H. von Holstein, Deputy Registrar, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on16 September 2004, in which it has ruled:

----

(1)OJ C 7 of 11.1.2003.

----
(75 South. 700)

#### PEARSON v. STATE.

(8 Div. 452.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 8, 1917.)

1. Criminal Law <@=3407(2) — Evidence—Res Gestas — Admissibility.

In prosecution for assault to rape, statements of the victim and of the victim’s parents and of the witness, made at the time of the assault in the presence of defendant, were admissible.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 949, 968.]

2. Rape <@=338(3) — Assault with Intent-Evidence — Res Gestae — Admissibility.

In a prosecution for assault to rape, where the victim testified that accused used a pistol, it was competent for another witness to say that at about the time of the alleged offense accused had a pistol.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Colbert County; C. P. Almon, Judge.

Jack Pearson was c'onvicted of assault with intent to rape, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

*109A. H. Camichael and Jackson & Deloney, all of Tuscumbia, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and P. W. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMFORD, J.

The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the offense of assault to rape, and from the judgment of conviction he appeals.

[1] On the trial, during the examination of Geo. Vaughn, a witness for the state, after the examination of the girl who is alleged to have been assaulted, and after the witness had testified that he ran down to where she was, in answer to her call, and stopped the defendant and his buggy, and that about that time the father and mother of the girl came up, the state was permitted, over the objection of the defendant, to prove by the witness that the girl ran to her mother; that then and there, in the presence of defendant, witness told the father' and mother that the defendant had had the girl in the woods for 20 minutes; and, further, that the girl told her father and mother that the defendant tried to have intercourse with her. The evidence of the declarations of the girl and what she said and the declarations and accusations of the witness were made in the presence of the defendant and not denied; and, in line with the foregoing, the question to and answer of Viola Kirkman to which exception was reserved were proper.

[2] The girl alleged to have been assaulted having testified that the defendant pointed a pistol at her in order to force her to yield to him, it was competent for the state to prove by the witness Kirkman that, at the time and place the assault is alleged to have occurred, the defendant had a pistol.

The hedging about of the introduction of evidence with technical objections so often brings about a miscarriage of justice that the courts will liberally construe the rules, so that the jury can'get the entire transaction.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 49505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20316]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact taking effect.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This publishes notice of the Tribal-State Compact between the 
State of California and the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake taking 
effect.

DATES: Effective Date: August 10, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary--Policy and 
Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under Section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA) Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. Sec.  2710, 
the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register 
notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in 
Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. The Compact allows for one 
gaming facility and authorizes up to 750 gaming devices, any banking or 
percentage card games, and any devices or games authorized under state 
law to the state lottery. The Compact, also, authorizes limited annual 
payments to the State for statewide exclusivity. Finally, the term of 
the compact is until December 31, 2031. This Compact is considered to 
have been approved but only to the extent that the Compact is 
consistent with the provisions of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

    Dated: August 3, 2011.
Jodi Gillette,
Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2011-20316 Filed 8-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P
§ 4043.63 Liquidation. ( a ) *Reportable event.* Advance notice is required for a liquidation of a member of a plan's controlled group, as described in § 4043.30.
( b ) *Waiver—de minimis 5-percent segment and ongoing plans.* Notice under this section is waived if the person that liquidates is a *de minimis* 5-percent segment of the plan's controlled group for the most recent fiscal year(s) ending on or before the effective date of the reportable event, and each plan that was maintained by the liquidating member is maintained by another member of the plan's controlled group.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 99 (Monday, May 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 32088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12909]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING MEETING:  Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:  May 15, 2000, 65 
FR 30985.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING:  May 17, 2000, 10 a.m.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING:  The following Docket No. and Company has been 
added as Item CAE-34 on the Agenda scheduled for May 17, 2000 meeting.

Item No.
    CAE-34
Docket No. and Company
    EL00-75-000, Notice of Interim Procedures to Support Industry 
Reliability Efforts and Requests for Commission

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-12909 Filed 5-18-00; 11:49 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2015-3989

 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM250AD

B/E AEROSPACE SB 117042-35-001, R003 --- 6/25/15

B/E AEROSPACE SB 117042-35-001, R002 --- 5/29/15

B/E AEROSPACE SB 117042-35-001, R001 --- 4/9/15

B/E AEROSPACE SB 117042-35-001 --- 12/10/14

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coinless Systems, Inc. a Nevada
corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I Darryl D. Dorsett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 3(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

           /s/ Darryl D. Dorsett
           -------------------------------
           By:  Darryl D. Dorsett
           Title:  Chief Financial Officer

DATE:   May 13, 2003

          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coinless Systems, Inc. a Nevada
corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I Michael Saunders, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 3(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

           /S/ MICHAEL SAUNDERS
           --------------------
           By:  Michael Saunders
           TitleInterim President
           May 13, 2003



                                       43
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Baron
Capital Properties, L.P. financial statements for the twelve months ended
December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
 </LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               79,641
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       341,872
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    421,513
<PP&E>                                            7,502,769
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,453,177)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    7,590,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,218,661
<BONDS>                                           4,370,486
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                        2,001,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      7,590,767
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    585,136
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1,024,213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2,202,173
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,641,250)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,641,250)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (1.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.43)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Longview Fibre Company (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, R. H. Wollenberg, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 27, 2007



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|R. H. WOLLENBERG                                             
|R. H. WOLLENBERG                                             
|President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board
#### § 5.21 [Reserved]