alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 516.5 Records to be preserved 3 years. Each employer shall preserve for at least 3 years: ( a ) *Payroll records.* From the last date of entry, all payroll or other records containing the employee information and data required under any of the applicable sections of this part, and
( b ) *Certificates, agreements, plans, notices, etc.* From their last effective date, all written: ( 1 ) Collective bargaining agreements relied upon for the exclusion of certain costs under section 3(m) of the Act,
( 2 ) Collective bargaining agreements, under section 7(b)(1) or 7(b)(2) of the Act, and any amendments or additions thereto,
( 3 ) Plans, trusts, employment contracts, and collective bargaining agreements under section 7(e) of the Act,
( 4 ) Individual contracts or collective bargaining agreements under section 7(f) of the Act. Where such contracts or agreements are not in writing, a written memorandum summarizing the terms of each such contract or agreement,
( 5 ) Written agreements or memoranda summarizing the terms of oral agreements or understandings under section 7(g) or 7(j) of the Act, and
( 6 ) Certificates and notices listed or named in any applicable section of this part.
( c ) *Sales and purchase records.* A record of ( 1 ) total dollar volume of sales or business, and
( 2 ) total volume of goods purchased or received during such periods (weekly, monthly, quarterly, etc.), in such form as the employer maintains records in the ordinary course of business.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 109 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 109

   Congratulating the University of Alaska Fairbanks rifle team for 
    winning the 2007 National Collegiate Athletic Association Rifle 
                             Championship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 2007

  Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Stevens) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Congratulating the University of Alaska Fairbanks rifle team for 
    winning the 2007 National Collegiate Athletic Association Rifle 
                             Championship.

Whereas, on March 10, 2007, before a crowd of more than 900 fans in Fairbanks, 
        Alaska, the University of Alaska Fairbanks rifle team (referred to in 
        this preamble as the ``Nanooks rifle team'') earned a combined total of 
        4,662 points for the performance of the team in the smallbore rifle and 
        air rifle competitions to win the 2007 National Collegiate Athletic 
        Association Rifle Championship (referred to in this preamble as the 
        ``NCAA Rifle Championship'');
Whereas that victory marked the 9th NCAA Rifle Championship won by the Nanooks 
        rifle team since 1994;
Whereas winning the NCAA Rifle Championship was the pinnacle of a remarkable 
        undefeated season for the Nanooks rifle team;
Whereas 6 members of the Nanook rifle team were named National Collegiate 
        Athletic Association All-Americans;
Whereas 2nd-year coach Dan Jordan, along with each member of the Nanooks rifle 
        team, dedicated his or her time and effort to ensuring that the Nanooks 
        rifle team won the NCAA Rifle Championship;
Whereas the families of the shooters, students, alumni, faculty, and all of the 
        supporters of the Nanooks rifle team are to be congratulated for their 
        commitment to, and pride in, the Nanooks rifle team;
Whereas the members of the 2006-2007 Nanooks rifle team are excellent 
        representatives of a fine university that is a leader in higher 
        education and produces many fine student-athletes and other community 
        leaders; and
Whereas the Nanooks rifle team showed tremendous dedication to each other, 
        appreciation for their fans, sportsmanship to their opponents, and 
        respect for the sport of competitive shooting throughout the 2006-2007 
        season: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate congratulates the University of Alaska 
Fairbanks rifle team for winning the 2007 National Collegiate Athletic 
Association Rifle Championship.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 778.303 Retroactive pay increases.

Where a retroactive pay increase is awarded to employees as a result of collective bargaining or otherwise, it operates to increase the regular rate of pay of the employees for the period of its retroactivity. Thus, if an employee is awarded a retroactive increase of 10 cents per hour, he is owed, under the Act, a retroactive increase of 15 cents for each overtime hour he has worked during the period, no matter what the agreement of the parties may be. A retroactive pay increase in the form of a lump sum for a particular period must be prorated back over the hours of the period to which it is allocable to determine the resultant increases in the regular rate, in precisely the same manner as a lump sum bonus. For a discussion of the method of allocating bonuses based on employment in a prior period to the workweeks covered by the bonus payment, see § 778.209.
§ 516.24 Employees employed under section 7(f) “Belo” contracts. With respect to each employee to whom both sections 6 and 7(f) of the Act apply, the employer shall maintain and preserve payroll or other records containing all the information and data required by § 516.2(a) except paragraphs (a) (8) and (9), and, in addition, the following: ( a ) Total weekly guaranteed earnings,
( b ) Total weekly compensation in excess of weekly guaranty,
( c ) A copy of the bona fide individual contract or the agreement made as a result of collective bargaining by representatives of employees, or where such contract or agreement is not in writing, a written memorandum summarizing its terms.
(76 South. 473)

#### COGBURN v. STATE.

(4 Div. 518.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 30, 1917.)

1. Bastards <&wkey;35 — Proceedings against Minor — Jurisdiction.

A proceeding in bastardy is not criminal, and the court did not err in putting defendant to trial and overruling his motion to suspend the proceedings and remit him to the probate court, as provided by Act 1915, pp. 577-589, with reference to criminal prosecution, on the ground that he was under the age of 16.

2. Bastards &wkey;>34, 70 — Defenses—Minority.

TEé plea that defendant was under 16 years at the time of the commission of offense was not a legal answer, but, the state having taken issue upon the plea, and it appearing that defendant was under 16 years of age at the time the child was begotten, defendant was entitled to a verdict on his plea.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dale County; Judge S. Williams, Judge.

Will Henry Cogburn was tried on a charge of bastardy, preferred by Mattie Newman, and from a judgment in favor of the State, he appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

H. D. Martin, of Ozark, for appellant. W. D. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMFORD, J.

[1] A proceeding in bastardy is not criminal, and is not the prosecution by the state for a crime. In fact, bastardy, under our laws, is not a crime, hut is a proceeding by the state, at the instance of the mother of a bastard child, against the reputed father, for the purpose of finding the real father of the child, and forcing him to support it.

It is earnestly insisted by appellant’s counsel that the trial court should not have put him upon trial because he was under the age of 16 years at the time the child was begotten, and therefore the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suspend the proceedings against him and remit him to the probate court of Dale county, Ala., as provided by act of the Legislature of Alabama approved September 16, 1915, pages 577 to 589, inclusive. As we have said, this is not a prosecution for crime, and therefore the act of the Legislature above referred to does not apply to this case, and the trial court did not err in proceeding to ascertain whether or not the defendant was the real father of the bastard child.

[2] The defendant, however, interposed plea 2, in the following words:

> “At the time of the commission of the offense, he was under 16 years of age.”

This plea was not a legal answer to the complaint, and would have been stricken upon motion, but the state took issue upon it, and, having taken issue upon it, and it appearing from the fact, as stated in the bill of exceptions, that the defendant was under the age of 16 years at the time the child was begotten, the defendant was entitled to a verdict on this plea, and the court erred in refusing changes requested by the defendant in writing to this effect. Ala. State Land Co. v. Slaton, 120 Ala. 259, 24 South. 720; McGhee v. Reynolds, 117 Ala. 413, 23 South. 68; Gerald & Chambers v. Tunstall, 109 Ala. 567, 20 South. 43.

For the error above pointed out, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48855-48856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20047]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-4141-000]


New York Independent System Operator, Inc.; Notice of Request for 
Waiver and Shortened Notice Period

    On July 29, 2011, the New York Independent System Operator, Inc. 
(NYISO) filed a notification of its inability to timely complete price 
corrections, a request for a limited tariff waiver to permit ancillary 
service prices to be corrected with the corrected prices to be posted 
by the end of Monday, August 1, 2011, and a request for a shortened 
notice period and expedited Commission action. NYISO requests a 
shortened answer period to facilitate expedited Commission 
consideration. NYISO states that good cause exists for the Commission 
to act on an expedited basis because until the Commission acts on 
NYISO's waiver request, NYISO and market participants will not know if

[[Page 48856]]

certain posted real-time ancillary service prices are correct and 
final.
    By this notice, the period for filing answers to NYISO's request 
for a tariff waiver is shortened to and including August 3, 2011.

    Dated: July 29, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-20047 Filed 8-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > A Policy Insuring Value to the Woman Buyer and a Livelihood to Apparel Makers

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Nienburg, Bertha M., 1890-. 						*A Policy Insuring Value to the Woman Buyer and a Livelihood to Apparel Makers : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 146*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1936,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5427,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 127987 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 127987 

 COA: 252178 

Jackson CC: 03-000659-FC 

JAMAAL SHAHEED HUNT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 16, 2004 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005
 

Clerk
§ 525.11 Issuance of certificates. ( a ) Upon consideration of the criteria cited in these regulations, a special certificate may be issued.
( b ) If a special minimum wage certificate is issued, a copy shall be sent to the employer. If denied, the employer will be notified in writing and told the reasons for the denial, as well as the right to petition under § 525.18.
#### § 778.316 Agreements or practices in conflict with statutory requirements are ineffective.

While it is permissible for an employer and an employee to agree upon different base rates of pay for different types of work, it is settled under the Act that where a rate has been agreed upon as applicable to a particular type of work the parties cannot lawfully agree that the rate for that work shall be lower merely because the work is performed during the statutory overtime hours, or during a week in which statutory overtime is worked. Since a lower rate cannot lawfully be set for overtime hours it is obvious that the parties cannot lawfully agree that the working time will not be paid for at all. An agreement that only the first 8 hours of work on any days or only the hours worked between certain fixed hours of the day or only the first 40 hours of any week will be counted as working time will clearly fail of its evasive purpose. An announcement by the employer that no overtime work will be permitted, or that overtime work will not be compensated unless authorized in advance, will not impair the employee's right to compensation for work which he is actually suffered or permitted to perform.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board will hold a public meeting on Sunday, August 6, 2000, from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the Double Tree Hotel, Portland, Maine to discuss such matters as may be presented by members, staff of the U.S. Small Business Administration, or others present. 

For further information, please write or call Ellen Thrasher, U. S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW, Fourth Floor, Washington, DC 20416. Telephone number (202) 205-6817. 

Bettie Baca, 

Counselor to the Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 00-13094 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-U ]
Molecular, Clinical and Environmental Toxicology Experientia Supplementum

Volume 101, 2012, pp 47-86
§ 541.106 Concurrent duties. ( a ) Concurrent performance of exempt and nonexempt work does not disqualify an employee from the executive exemption if the requirements of § 541.100 are otherwise met. Whether an employee meets the requirements of § 541.100 when the employee performs concurrent duties is determined on a case-by-case basis and based on the factors set forth in § 541.700. Generally, exempt executives make the decision regarding when to perform nonexempt duties and remain responsible for the success or failure of business operations under their management while performing the nonexempt work. In contrast, the nonexempt employee generally is directed by a supervisor to perform the exempt work or performs the exempt work for defined time periods. An employee whose primary duty is ordinary production work or routine, recurrent or repetitive tasks cannot qualify for exemption as an executive.
( b ) For example, an assistant manager in a retail establishment may perform work such as serving customers, cooking food, stocking shelves and cleaning the establishment, but performance of such nonexempt work does not preclude the exemption if the assistant manager's primary duty is management. An assistant manager can supervise employees and serve customers at the same time without losing the exemption. An exempt employee can also simultaneously direct the work of other employees and stock shelves.
( c ) In contrast, a relief supervisor or working supervisor whose primary duty is performing nonexempt work on the production line in a manufacturing plant does not become exempt merely because the nonexempt production line employee occasionally has some responsibility for directing the work of other nonexempt production line employees when, for example, the exempt supervisor is unavailable. Similarly, an employee whose primary duty is to work as an electrician is not an exempt executive even if the employee also directs the work of other employees on the job site, orders parts and materials for the job, and handles requests from the prime contractor.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James A. Wylie, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Diomed Holdings,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  May 12, 2006                       /s/ JAMES A. WYLIE, JR.
                                             -------------------------------