alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(79 South. 146)

#### COLBERT v. STATE.

(8 Div. 611.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 28, 1918.)

Criminal Law <&wkey;1182 — Appeal—Affirmance.

Appeal being upon record proper, and proceedings appearing regular in every respect, judgment will be affirmed; certificate of clerk showing that more than 90 days have elapsed since judgment of conviction and notation of appeal, and that no bill of exceptions has been presented.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Limestone County; R. C. Brickell, Judge.

William Colbert was convicted of miscegenation, and appeals.

Affirmed.

F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRICKEN, J.

This appeal is on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions. The proceedings appear regular in every respect, and show a judgment of conviction, finding the defendant guilty of the offense of miscegenation, following a verdict of the jury. The record also shows a sentence imposed upon the defendant in due form, sentencing him to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of 3 years. The certificate of the clerk shows that more than 90 days have elapsed since the judgment of conviction and notation of appeal by defendant, and that no bill of exceptions has been presented. No error appearing in the record, the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.
§ 4041.21 Requirements for a standard termination. ( a ) *Notice and distribution requirements.* A standard termination is valid if the plan administrator— ( 1 ) Issues a notice of intent to terminate to all affected parties (other than the PBGC) in accordance with § 4041.23;
( 2 ) Issues notices of plan benefits to all affected parties entitled to plan benefits in accordance with § 4041.24;
( 3 ) Files a standard termination notice with the PBGC in accordance with § 4041.25;
( 4 ) Distributes the plan's assets in satisfaction of plan benefits in accordance with § 4041.28(a) and (c); and
( 5 ) In the case of a spin-off/termination transaction (as defined in § 4041.23(c)), issues the notices required by § 4041.23(c), § 4041.24(f), and § 4041.27(a)(2) in accordance with such sections.
( b ) *Plan sufficiency* — ( 1 ) *Commitment to make plan sufficient.* A contributing sponsor of a plan or any other member of the plan's controlled group may make a commitment to contribute any additional sums necessary to enable the plan to satisfy plan benefits in accordance with § 4041.28. A commitment will be valid only if— ( i ) It is made to the plan;
( ii ) It is in writing, signed by the contributing sponsor or controlled group member(s); and
( iii ) In any case in which the person making the commitment is the subject of a bankruptcy liquidation or reorganization proceeding, as described in § 4041.41(c)(1) or (c)(2), the commitment is approved by the court before which the liquidation or reorganization proceeding is pending or a person not in bankruptcy unconditionally guarantees to meet the commitment at or before the time distribution of assets is required.
( 2 ) *Alternative treatment of majority owner's benefit.* A majority owner may elect to forgo receipt of his or her plan benefits to the extent necessary to enable the plan to satisfy all other plan benefits in accordance with § 4041.28. Any such alternative treatment of the majority owner's plan benefits is valid only if— ( i ) The majority owner's election is in writing;
( ii ) In any case in which the plan would require the spouse of the majority owner to consent to distribution of the majority owner's receipt of his or her plan benefits in a form other than a qualified joint and survivor annuity, the spouse consents in writing to the election;
( iii ) The majority owner makes the election and the spouse consents during the time period beginning with the date of issuance of the first notice of intent to terminate and ending with the date of the last distribution; and
( iv ) Neither the majority owner's election nor the spouse's consent is inconsistent with a qualified domestic relations order (as defined in section 206(d)(3) of ERISA).
#### REEVES v THOMAS etc

Ohio Supreme Court

No 22133.

Decided March 5, 1930

Marshall, CJ., Kinkade, Robinson, Jones, Matthias and Allen, JJ., concur.
Order 2010-9-18

Served: September 16, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 16th Day of September, 2010

Docket DOT-OST-2009-0155

ORDER EXTENDING COMMENT PERIOD

On September 14, 2010, Delta Air Lines and the above-captioned affiliates of the Virgin Blue 

Group (together referred to as the “applicants”) filed a motion for an extension of time to respond to 

Show Cause Order 2009-10-4.1 

The applicants request a three-week extension. They argue that there is good cause for granting 

the request because the additional time will assist in the development of a more complete record and 

enable the applicants to address the issues identified in the Show-Cause Order. The applicants 

further argue that an extension will not prejudice any party. Having polled representatives of air 

carriers, the applicants report that there are no objections to the motion.2

Under the circumstances, we agree that there is good cause for an extension, and that the 

additional time would not prejudice any party. We will, therefore, grant the motion.

 1 Motion for An Extension of Time (September 14, 2010). 2 See Letter from Alexander Van der Bellen, Counsel for Delta Air Lines, to Dorothy Beard, Chief of DOT Dockets 

(September 14, 2010).

Joint Application of:

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

VIRGIN BLUE AIRLINES PTY LTD

VIRGIN BLUE INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES

 PTY LTD D/B/A V AUSTRALIA

PACIFIC BLUE AIRLINES (NZ) LTD

PACIFIC BLUE AIRLINES (AUST) PTY LTD

Under 49 U.S.C. §§ 41308-41309 for approval of 

and antitrust immunity for alliance agreements
2

ACCORDINGLY:

1. We grant the motion submitted on September 14, 2010 by Delta Air Lines, Inc. (along with 

its affiliates), Virgin Blue PTY LTD, Virgin Blue International Airlines PTY LTD d/b/a V 

Australia, Pacific Blue Airlines (NZ) LTD, and Pacific Blue Airlines (AUST) PTY LTD;

2. Objections or comments to our tentative findings and conclusions in Order 2010-9-4 are due 

no later than October 13, 2010, and answers to objections or comments shall be due no later 

than October 22, 2010; and

3. We will serve this Order on all parties on the service list in this docket.

By:

SUSAN L. KURLAND

Assistant Secretary for Aviation

and International Affairs

(SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available at: http://www.regulations.gov
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**TerminalConference, July 1945 : papers and minutes of meetings, Terminal Conference
 
epub|mobi| pdf|
 
SuDoc Number:D 5.2:C76/9
Item Number:0315 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001021881
January 29, 2019
MEMORANDUM 

FROM: Keith Barnett, EPA, Environmental Engineer 

TO: Portland Cement NESHAP Docket 

DATE: July 26, 2011 

RE: Addition of document to administrative record 

The notice denying reconsideration of the various petitions to reconsider the cement kiln 

NESHAP referred to comments submitted by the Portland Cement Association to a different 

EPA rulemaking involving standards for commercial and industrial solid waste incinerators. See 

76 FR at 28322/3. However, EPA inadvertently did not also place these comments in the 

reconsideration docket, and is now doing so. Because the reconsideration notice refers to these 

comments, there is no prejudice to any party in this late addition to the record.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bear Lake Recreation, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), We, Wayne Bassham, President and director and Todd Albiston, Secretary/Treasurer of our Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| *Date:*** | *10/27/06*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Wayne Bassham***       |
|-----------|--------------|----------|----------|----------------------------|
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Wayne Bassham***          |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *President and Director*** |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | * *                   |
| *Date:*** | *10/27/06*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Todd Albiston***       |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Todd Albiston***          |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Secretary and Director*** |
Exhibit 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) of Loehmann's, Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2000, (except for
note 1, as to which the date is April 24, 2000) included in the 1999 Annual
Report to Stockholders of Loehmann's, Inc.

         Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Loehmann's
Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.

         We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statements (Form S-8 Numbers 333-31701, 333-05751 and 333-05749) of Loehmann's,
Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2000, (except for note 1, as to which the
date is April 24, 2000) with respect to the financial statements incorporated
herein by reference.

/s/ Ernst & Young
-----------------
New York, New York
May 12, 2000
Exhibit
23.2








LAWRENCE
SCHARFMAN & CO., CPA PC


Certified
Public Accounts





18
      E SUNRISE HIGHWAY, #203
            
            HONEY
      BELL CIRCLEFREEPORT,
      NY 11520
            
            BOYNTON
      BEACH FL, 33437TELEPHONE:
      (516) 771-5900
            
            TELEPHONE:
      (561) 733-0296FACSIMILE:
      (516) 771-2598
            
            FACSIMILE:
      (561) 470-0613








Marshall
Holdings International, Inc.


Richard
Bailey


2555
East Washburn Road


North
Las Vegas, NV 89081








CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





I hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in this Form 10-KSB filed on or about
April 11, 2007 of the report dated April 10, 2007, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Gateway Distributors, Ltd. for the year ended December
31, 2005, and to our inclusion as a named expert.  Our report included
an explanatory paragraph regarding the substantial doubt about Gateway’s ability
to continue as a going concern.








Sincerely





/s/ Lawrence ScharfmanLawrence
      Scharfman
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
          This schedule contains summary financial information extracted fom the
          Statement of Income, Balance Sheet and Statement of Cash Flows, and is
          qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        3,814,081
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         50,816
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             854,272
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                            85,702
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   7,091,854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,896,725
<COMMON>                                           608,635
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        1,097,720
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                953,492
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   2,659,847
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              562,600
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             4,395,555
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                       0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      101,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                          139,374
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                              0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                         0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   4,038,349
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   11,896,725
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        3,124,094
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               237,371
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       2,118,427
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       2,355,798
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            768,296
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  (4,183)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     764,113
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           404,473
<NET-INCOME>                                       359,640
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         51,813
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      307,827
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           215,790
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          351,261
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             674,084
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         2.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         2.54
        


</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2502

_____________________________

JESSE FRANKLIN HOLLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

John F. Simon, Judge.

August 30, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, B.L. THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Megan Lynne Long, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 165 

Relative to the death of Representative Juanita Millender-McDonald, of 

California. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 23, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. 

AKAKA, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. BAYH, Mr. 

BENNETT, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. BOND, Mr. BROWN, Mr. 

BROWNBACK, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. BURR, Mr. BYRD, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. 

CARDIN, Mr. CARPER, Mr. CASEY, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. 

COBURN, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. COLEMAN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. 

CORKER, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. DODD, 

Mrs. DOLE, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. 

ENZI, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. GREGG, Mr. 

HAGEL, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. HATCH, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. 

INOUYE, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KERRY, Ms. 

KLOBUCHAR, Mr. KOHL, Mr. KYL, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. LAUTENBERG, 

Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. LOTT, Mr. 

LUGAR, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. MCCAIN, Mrs. MCCASKILL, Mr. MENENDEZ, 

Ms. MIKULSKI, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. NELSON of Florida, 

Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. REED, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SCHUMER, 

Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. SMITH, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. SPECTER, Ms. 

STABENOW, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. SUNUNU, Mr. TESTER, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. 

THUNE, Mr. VITTER, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. WARNER, Mr. WEBB, Mr. 

WHITEHOUSE, and Mr. WYDEN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Relative to the death of Representative Juanita MillenderMcDonald, of California. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

SRES 165 ATS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound 

2 sorrow and deep regret the announcement of the death 

3 of the Honorable Juanita Millender-McDonald, late a Rep4 resentative from the State of California. 

5 Resolved, That the Secretary communicate these reso6 lutions to the House of Representatives and transmit an 

7 enrolled copy thereof to the family of the deceased. 

8 Resolved, That when the Senate adjourns or recesses 

9 today, it stand adjourned or recessed as a further mark 

10 of respect to the memory of the late Representative. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
# ACTION:

 Notice.

The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

*Title, Associated Form, and OMB Number:*                     Application and Agreement for Establishment of a National Defense Cadet Agreement; DA Form 3126-1; OMB Number 0702—                

*Type of Request:*                     New Collection.                

*Number of Respondents:*                     35.                

*Responses Per Respondent:*                     1.                

*Annual Responses:*                     35.                

*Average Burden Per Response:*                     1 hour.                

*Annual Burden Hours:*                     35.                

*Needs and Uses:*                     Educational institutions desiring to host a National Defense Cadet Corps Unit (NDCC) may apply by using a DA Form 3126-1. The DA Form 3126-1 documents the agreement and becomes a contract signed by both the secondary institution and the U.S. Government. This form provides information on the school's facilities and states specific conditions if a NDCC unit is placed at the institution. The data provided on the application is used to determine which school will be selected.                

*Affected Public:*                     State, Local, or Tribal Government; Not-For-Profit Institutions.                

*Frequency:*                     On occasion.                

*Respondent's Obligation:*                     Required to Obtain or Retain Benefits.                

*OMB Desk Officer:*                     Mr. Edward C. Springer.                

Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

*DOD Clearance Officer:*                     Mr. Robert Cushing.                

Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

Dated: January 12, 2000.

Patricia L. Toppings,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-1305 Filed 1-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
#### § 500.40 Registration in general.

Any person who desires to engage in any activity as a farm labor contractor, as defined in the Act and these regulations, and is not exempt, is required first to obtain a Certificate of Registration authorizing each such activity. Any employee of a registered farm labor contractor who performs farm labor contracting activities solely on behalf of such contractor, and who is not an independent contractor, must obtain a Farm Labor Contractor Employee Certificate of Registration authorizing each such activity. The employee's certificate must show the name of the farm labor contractor for whom the activities are to be performed. The contractor whose name appears on the employee's certificate must hold a valid Certificate of Registration covering the entire period shown on the employee's certificate.
#### § 500.124 Liability bond in lieu of insurance policy.

Financial responsibility in lieu of insurance may be evidenced by a liability bond executed as the “principal” by the person who will be transporting a migrant or seasonal agricultural worker, together with a third party identified in the instrument as the “surety”, to assure payment of any liability up to $500,000 for damages to persons or property arising out of such person's ownership of, operation of, or causing to be operated any vehicle for the transportation of such worker in connection with the person's business, activities, or operations. The “surety” shall be one which appears on the list contained in Treasury Department Circular 570, or which has been approved by the Secretary under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-406). Treasury Department Circular 570 may be obtained from the U.S. Treasury Department, Audit Staff, Bureau of Government Financial Operations, Washington, DC 20226.