Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2011 / Notices 48145 

4See Analysis of CBP Entry Documentation. 5See Final Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon 

Steel Flat Products from the People’s Republic of 

China, 72 FR 41710 (July 31, 2007). 

may also enter under the following tariff 

numbers: 7225.11.00.00, 7225.19.00.00, 

7225.30.30.50, 7225.30.70.00, 

7225.40.70.00, 7225.99.00.90, 

7226.11.10.00, 7226.11.90.30, 

7226.11.90.60, 7226.19.10.00, 

7226.19.90.00, 7226.91.50.00, 

7226.91.70.00, 7226.91.80.00, and 

7226.99.00.00. Subject merchandise 

may also enter under 7210.70.30.00, 

7210.90.90.00, 7211.14.00.30, 

7212.40.10.00, 7212.40.50.00, and 

7212.50.00.00. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

subject to the order is dispositive. 

Preliminary Rescission of Review 

The Department has analyzed all of 

the information on the record regarding 

alleged U.S. entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR by 

Baosteel. As noted above, the 

Department placed information on the 

record from CBP that indicated that 

subject merchandise produced by 

Baosteel may have entered the United 

States during the POR. Because the 

information found in the CBP 

documentation is proprietary, for 

further discussion of this issue please 

see the Memorandum to the File, 

through Scot T. Fullerton, Program 

Manager, from Steven Hampton, 

International Trade Analyst, ‘‘Certain 

Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products 

from the People’s Republic of China: 

Analysis of CBP Entry Documentation,’’ 

(‘‘Analysis of CBP Entry 

Documentation’’) dated concurrently 

with this notice. Based on its analysis of 

the record information, the Department 

preliminarily finds that the merchandise 

from the entry documentation is not 

subject to the scope of the antidumping 

duty order on hot-rolled carbon steel flat 

products from the PRC.4

Because there is no information on 

the record which indicates that Baosteel 

made sales, shipments, or entries to the 

United States of subject merchandise 

during the POR, and because Baosteel is 

the only company subject to this 

administrative review, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3) and 

consistent with our practice, we are 

preliminarily rescinding this review of 

the antidumping duty order on hotrolled from the PRC for the period of 

November 1, 2009, through October 31, 

2010.5 If the Department adopts these 

preliminary results for its final results, 

the cash deposit rate for Baosteel will 

continue to be the rate established in the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding. If the Department continues 

to find for its final results that the 

merchandise is not subject to the scope 

of the antidumping duty order on 

certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat 

products from the PRC, we will refer 

this matter to CBP to determine the 

appropriate Customs classification for 

the merchandise in question. 

Comments 

Interested parties may submit 

comments for consideration in the 

Department’s final results not later than 

30 days after publication of this notice. 

See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii). Responses to 

those comments may be submitted not 

later than five days following 

submission of the comments. See 19 

CFR 351.309(d). All written comments 

must be submitted in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.303, and must be served on 

interested parties on the Department’s 

service list in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(3). Interested parties may also 

request a hearing within 30 days of 

publication of this notice. See 19 CFR 

351.310. The Department will issue the 

final results of this administrative 

review, which will include the results of 

its analysis of issues raised in any such 

comments, within 120 days of 

publication of the preliminary results, 

and will publish these results in the 

Federal Register. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751 and 

777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: July 29, 2011. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20076 Filed 8–5–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

North American Free-Trade 

Agreement, Article 1904; Binational 

Panel Reviews: Notice of Termination 

of Panel Review 

AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United 

States Section, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of Termination of Panel 

Review of the Final Results of the first 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on Citric Acid 

and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada, 

Secretariat File No. USA–CDA–2011– 

1904–03. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the negotiated 

settlement between the United States 

and Canadian industries, the panel 

review of the above-noted case is 

terminated as of August 2, 2011. No 

panel has been appointed to review this 

panel. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Ellen Bohon, United States Secretary, 

NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th 

and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–5438. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 

19 of the North American Free-Trade 

Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) established a 

mechanism to replace domestic judicial 

review of final determinations in 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

cases involving imports from a NAFTA 

country with review by independent 

binational panels. When a Request for 

Panel Review is filed, a panel is 

established to act in place of national 

courts to review expeditiously the final 

determination to determine whether it 

conforms to the antidumping or 

countervailing duty law of the country 

that made the determination. 

Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, 

which came into force on January 1, 

1994, the Government of the United 

States, the Government of Canada, and 

the Government of Mexico established 

Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 

Binational Panel Reviews (‘‘Rules’’). 

These Rules were published in the 

Federal Register on February 23, 1994 

(59 FR 8686). The panel review in this 

matter was requested Pursuant to these 

Rules and terminated in accordance 

with the settlement agreement. 

Dated: August 3, 2011 

Ellen Bohon, 

United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20030 Filed 8–5–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES