alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 102 (Thursday, May 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13102]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THE NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


Meetings of Humanities Panel

AGENCY: The National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Public Law 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that the 
following meetings of the Humanities Panel will be held at the Old Post 
Office, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura S. Nelson, Advisory Committee 
Management Officer, National Endowment for the Humanities, Washington, 
DC 20506; telephone (202) 606-8322. Hearing-impaired individuals are 
advised that information on this matter may be obtained by contacting 
the Endowment's TDD terminal on (202) 606-8282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed meetings are for the purpose of 
panel review, discussion, evaluation and recommendation on applications 
for financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and 
the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including discussion of 
information given in confidence to the agency by the grant applicants. 
Because the proposed meetings will consider information that is likely 
to disclose trade secrets and commercial or financial information 
obtained from a person and privileged or confidential and/or 
information of a personal nature the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, pursuant 
to authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to 
Close Advisory Committee meetings, dated July 19, 1993, I have 
determined that these meetings will be closed to the public pursuant to 
subsections (c)(4), and (6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States 
Code.
    1. Date: June 23, 2000,
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.,
    Room: 415,
    Program: This meeting will review applications for Colleges, 
Universities, and Education Programs I, submitted to the Office of 
Challenge Grants at the May 1, 2000 deadline.
    2. Date: June 28, 2000,
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.,
    Room: 415,
    Program: This meeting will review applications for Colleges, 
Universities, and Education Programs II, submitted to the Office of 
Challenge Grants at the May 1, 2000 deadline.

Laura S. Nelson,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-13102 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-M
(78 South. 423)

#### OWENS v. STATE.

(8 Div. 537.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 2, 1918.)

1. Forgery ¡&wkey;44(%) — “Uttering Forged Instrument.”

Before a defendant can be convicted of uttering a forged instrument, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there was a forged instrument, and that the defendant, knowing the instrument to be forged, with the intent to defraud, uttered it.

[Ed. Note. — For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, First and Secorid Series, Utter.]

2. Forgery <&wkey;16 — Evidence — Sueeicienoy.

Testimony of person whose named was signed to check that the check was such as he used, but that he did not issue such a check to defendant, and never issued the check involved, does not establish a forgery; since it does not show that he did not authorize the signing of the check.

. Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; W. W. Haralson, Judge.

Robert Owens was indicted in two counts; the first charging the forgery of a-check, and the second charging the uttering of the check. Defendant was convicted under the second count, and appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

Milo Moody, of Scottsboro, for appellant. F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMFORD, J.

[1, 2] Before a defendant can be convicted of uttering a forged instrument, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there was a forged instrument, and that the defendant, knowing the instrument to he forged, with the intent to defraud, uttered it. The check in evidence purported to have been signed by Raymond Bradford, and was made payable to the order of Tom Jones, for $5.06. Bradford testified: “I had these checks made myself; that is, just exactly like the check I used. * * * I never issued a check of that character to this man. * * * I did not issue the cheek.”

This was all the evidence tending to prove the forgery. All of this may have been true, and yet no forgery have occurred. There is nothing in the evidence *to*show that Bradford did not authorize the signing of the check.

*414From the facts as disclosed by the bill of exceptions, the court erred in refusing to give the general charge as requested by the defendant.

Reversed and remanded.
#### Jacqueline Doynow et al., Appellants, v Petsmart, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[698 NYS2d 156]

—Appeal by the plaintiffs from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.), dated August 7, 1998.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs, for reasons stated by Justice Miller at the Supreme Court. Santucci, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Federal Government Spending and Employment /
              - 13.3 Federal Government Spending and Employment—Federal Expenditures on Health Care Programs

## Table 13.3: Federal Government Spending and Employment—Federal Expenditures on Health Care Programs

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Capital
      Solutions 1, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Capital Solutions
      1, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
      Christopher Astrom, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
      of Capital Solutions 1, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                ofthe
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects,
                the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:
      September 13, 2007





/s/
      CHRISTOPHER ASTROM


Christopher
      Astrom


Chief
      Executive Officer





/s/
      CHRISTOPHER ASTROM


Christopher
      Astrom


Chief
      Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BOYD'S
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF, AND FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED, JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,868
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                       180
<INVENTORY>                                      9,570
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,314
<PP&E>                                           4,118
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,353
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 278,560
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,078
<BONDS>                                        261,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      (48,243)
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,725
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   278,560
<SALES>                                        100,911
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               100,911
<CGS>                                           33,726
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,959
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,828
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,498
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,330
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  6,882
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,448
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50


</TABLE>
§ 503.3 Coordination among Governmental agencies. ( a ) Complaints received by ETA or any State Workforce Agency (SWA) regarding noncompliance with H-2B statutory or regulatory labor standards will be immediately forwarded to the appropriate WHD office for suitable action under the regulations in this part.
( b ) Information received in the course of processing registrations and applications, program integrity measures, or enforcement actions may be shared between OFLC and WHD or, where applicable to employer enforcement under the H-2B program, may be forwarded to other agencies as appropriate, including the Department of State (DOS) and DHS.
( c ) A specific violation for which debarment is sought will be cited in a single debarment proceeding. OFLC and the WHD will coordinate their activities to achieve this result. Copies of final debarment decisions will be forwarded to DHS promptly.
Exhibit 32



 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this
Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  period ended March 31, 2004 fully
complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act  of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report
fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of  operations  of  the  Company.


This 14th day of May, 2004.



                                      /s/ Charles M. Jones, III
                                      -------------------------
                                      Charles M. Jones, III
                                      Chief Executive Officer


                                      /s/ David J. Baranko
                                      --------------------
                                      David J. Baranko
                                      Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
§ 37.10 To what extent are employment practices covered by this part? ( a ) Discrimination on the ground of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or political affiliation or belief is prohibited in employment practices in the administration of, or in connection with: ( 1 ) Any WIA Title I-financially assisted program or activity; and
( 2 ) Any program or activity that is part of the One-Stop delivery system and is operated by a One-Stop partner listed in Section 121(b) of WIA, to the extent that the program or activity is being conducted as part of the One-Stop delivery system.
( b ) *Employee selection procedures.* In implementing this section, a recipient must comply with the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, 41 CFR part 60-3.
( c ) *Standards for employment-related investigations and reviews.* In any investigation or compliance review, the Director must consider Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) regulations, guidance and appropriate case law in determining whether a recipient has engaged in an unlawful employment practice.
( d ) As provided in § 37.3(b) of this part, 29 CFR part 32, subparts B and C and Appendix A, which implement the requirements of Section 504 pertaining to employment practices and employment-related training, program accessibility, and reasonable accommodation, have been incorporated into this part by reference. Therefore, recipients must comply with the requirements set forth in those regulatory sections as well as the requirements listed in this part.
( e ) Recipients that are also employers, employment agencies, or other entities covered by Titles I and II of the ADA should be aware of obligations imposed by those titles. *See* 29 CFR part 1630 and 28 CFR part 35.
( f ) Similarly, recipients that are also employers covered by the anti-discrimination provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act should be aware of the obligations imposed by that provision. *See* 8 U.S.C. 1324b, as amended.
( g ) This rule does not preempt consistent State and local requirements.
§ 2.13 Audiovisual coverage prohibited. The Department shall not permit audiovisual coverage of the following types of hearings if any party objects: ( a ) Hearings to determine whether applications for individual variances should be issued under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970.
( b ) Hearings (both formal and informal) involving alleged violations of various laws such as the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276a, *et seq.*) and related Acts, the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 327 *et seq.*), the Service Contract Act (41 U.S.C. 351 *et seq.*), the Walsh Healey Act (41 U.S.C. 35 *et seq.*), under section 41 of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. 941 *et seq.*), the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (29 U.S.C. 201 *et seq.*), and any informal hearings or conferences under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 651 *et seq.*) which are not within the jurisdiction of the Occupational Safety and Health Commission.
( c ) Adversary hearings under the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. 901 *et seq.*) and related Acts, which determine an employee's right to compensation.
( d ) Hearings which determine an employee's right to compensation under the Federal Employees' Compensation Act (5 U.S.C. 8101 *et seq.*).
PROMISSORY NOTE



$50,000.00                                                        April 7, 1998


        The undersigned, Navis Technologies, LTD ("Payor"), promises to pay to
John R. Varsames ("Payee") or order the principal sum of fifty thousand and
00/100 DOLLARS ($50,000.00) with interest accruing on the unpaid principal
balance at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum, the entire principal
balance plus accrued interest being due and payable on demand.

        Such payment(s) shall be made at Payee's residence located at
Burlington, Vermont, or at such other place as the Payee hereof may designate in
writing, and such payments and any other sum due hereunder shall be made in
lawful money of the United States of America.

        This Note may be prepaid without penalty.

        In the case of default, the Payor agrees to pay the reasonable cost of
collection, including reasonable attorneys' fees.

        Every maker, guarantor and endorser waives presentment, demand, protest,
and notice and agrees that the time of payment may be extended without notice or
previous consent.

                                           Navis Technologies, LTD



ATTEST: /S/                                By: /S/
       -----------------------------          -----------------------------
         Peter M. Doremus, Secretary            John R. Varsames, President




Paid in Full

Date:      4/9/99
      --------------------------

Signature:    /S/
          ----------------------
§ 2550.408g-2 Investment advice—fiduciary election. ( a ) *General.* Section 408(g)(11)(A) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, as amended (ERISA), provides that a person who develops a computer model or who markets a computer model or investment advice program used in an “eligible investment advice arrangement” shall be treated as a fiduciary of a plan by reason of the provision of investment advice referred to in ERISA section 3(21)(A)(ii) to the plan participant or beneficiary, and shall be treated as a “fiduciary adviser” for purposes of ERISA sections 408(b)(14) and 408(g), except that the Secretary of Labor may prescribe rules under which only one fiduciary adviser may elect to be treated as a fiduciary with respect to the plan. Section 4975(f)(8)(J)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the Code), contains a parallel provision to ERISA section 408(g)(11)(A) that applies for purposes of Code sections 4975(d)(17) and 4975(f)(8). This section sets forth requirements that must be satisfied in order for one such fiduciary adviser to elect to be treated as a fiduciary with respect to a plan under an eligible investment advice arrangement.
( b ) ( 1 ) If an election meets the requirements in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, then the person identified in the election shall be the sole fiduciary adviser treated as a fiduciary by reason of developing or marketing the computer model, or marketing the investment advice program, used in an eligible investment advice arrangement.
( 2 ) An election satisfies the requirements of this paragraph (b) with respect to an eligible investment advice arrangement if the election is in writing and such writing— ( i ) Identifies the investment advice arrangement, and the person offering the arrangement, with respect to which the election is to be effective;
( ii ) Identifies a person who— ( A ) Is described in any of 29 CFR 2550.408g-1(c)(2)(i)(A) through (E),
( B ) Develops the computer model, or markets the computer model or investment advice program, utilized in satisfaction of 29 CFR 2550.408g-1(b)(4) with respect to the arrangement, and
( C ) Acknowledges that it elects to be treated as the only fiduciary, and fiduciary adviser, by reason of developing such computer model, or marketing such computer model or investment advice program;
( iii ) Is signed by the person identified in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section;
( iv ) Is furnished to the person who authorized the arrangement, in accordance with 29 CFR 2550.408g-1(b)(5); and
( v ) Is maintained in accordance with 29 CFR 2550.408g-1(d).
[76 FR 66167, Oct. 25, 2011]
# Úřední věstník C 294/30.

| | ISSN 1725-5163 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 294 |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Svazek 4730. listopadu 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5163

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 294

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Svazek 4730. listopadu 2004

---

| Oznámeníč. | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Informace |
| | Komise |
| 2004/C 294/1 | Konečné roční účetní závěrky Evropských společenství – finanční rok 2003 – konsolidované závěrky týkající se plnění rozpočtu a konsolidované účetní závěrky | 1 |

Oznámeníč.

Obsah

Strana

I   Informace

Komise

2004/C 294/1

Konečné roční účetní závěrky Evropských společenství – finanční rok 2003 – konsolidované závěrky týkající se plnění rozpočtu a konsolidované účetní závěrky

1

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

I Informace

Komise

| 30.11.2004 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | C 294/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2004

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

C 294/1

---

Konečné roční účetní závěrky Evropských společenství – finanční rok 2003 – konsolidované závěrky týkající se plnění rozpočtu a konsolidované účetní závěrky

(2004/C 294/01)

Konečné roční účetní závěrky Evropských společenství – finanční rok 2003 – konsolidované závěrky týkající se plnění rozpočtu a konsolidované účetní závěrky – nebyly přeloženy do (lotyštiny, litevštiny, estonštiny, polštiny, maďarštiny, češtiny, slovenštiny, slovinštiny, maltštiny). Původní účetní závěrky v angličtině jsou však k dispozici v elektronické podobě na internetové adrese EUR-Lex, http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/JOIndex.do?ihmlang=en <http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/JOIndex.do?ihmlang=en>, v Úředním věstníku C 294 ze dne 30. listopadu 2004.

---
#### § 548.401 Agreement or understanding.

If the agreement or understanding establishing the basic rate is in writing, whether incorporated in a collective bargaining agreement or not, a copy of the agreement or understanding should be attached to the application. If it is not in writing, however, the application to the Administrator for approval of a basic rate should contain a written statement describing the substance of the agreement or understanding, including the proposed effective date and term of the agreement or understanding. The term of the agreement or understanding may be of definite duration, or may run indefinitely until modified or changed. If an agreement or understanding is modified, a new application for authorization should be made.[19]

[20 FR 5683, Aug. 6, 1955, as amended at 21 FR 338, Jan. 18, 1956]

###### Footnotes -
  548.401

[19] See § 548.200 for a further explanation of the requirements as to the agreement or understanding establishing the basic rate.