alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC. (REGISTRANT)
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James A. Wylie, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify to
the best of my knowledge and belief pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005,
which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Registrant.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter
63 title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.

Date:  May 13, 2005                             /s/ JAMES A. WYLIE, JR.
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                   James A. Wylie, Jr.
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000059593
<NAME> LINDBERG CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         157,397
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,281,571
<ALLOWANCES>                                   888,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,893,808
<PP&E>                                     125,918,525
<DEPRECIATION>                              59,181,581
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             115,489,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,271,439
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        66,734
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,326,023
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               115,489,802
<SALES>                                    125,069,317
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           125,069,317
<CGS>                                       86,494,542
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               86,494,542
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            20,477,693
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,510,061
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,031,321
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,493,417
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,537,904
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,537,904
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.74
        

</TABLE>
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed December 16, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00273-CV

CHARLES BAILER, Appellant

V.

AT&T RISK MGT INC., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-02664-C

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Lewis

Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers

The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By letter dated June 13, 2013, we informed 

appellant that the District Clerk had notified the Court that the clerk’s record had not been filed 

because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We 

directed appellant to file written verification that he had paid for or made arrangements to pay for 

the clerk’s record or that he had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We 

cautioned appellant that if he did not file the required documentation within ten days, we might 

dismiss the appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not provided the required 

documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the clerk’s 

record.
–2–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

130273F.P05

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

CHARLES BAILER, Appellant

No. 05-13-00273-CV V.

AT&T RISK MGT INC., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 3, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-02664-C.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers. 

Justices Francis and Lewis participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellees AT&T RISK MGT INC., ET AL., recover its costs of this 

appeal from appellant CHARLES BAILER.

Judgment entered this 16th day of December, 2013.

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
AFS-13-371-E

June 14, 2013

 Exemption No. 10801

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0435

Ms. Penny Hanlon

Parent of Gabrielle Hanlon

7330 Woodland Drive, Suite 201

Indianapolis, IN 46278

Dear Ms. Hanlon:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received May 10, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Gabrielle Hanlon for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Gabrielle to 

exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, 

manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard 

a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Gabrielle.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using 

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security 

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the 
2

petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by 

persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant;

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Gabrielle Hanlon an exemption from § 121.311(b). In 

addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Gabrielle is

aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary 

to allow her to use an FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Gabrielle’s parents

or a caregiver accompanying her. Gabrielle Hanlon may only occupy a passenger seat with no 

passenger seated behind her. In addition, Gabrielle’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of 

this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours 

before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan 

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosure
#### Georghe Jecan, Appellant, v Gary J. Call et al., Respondents.

[698 NYS2d 485]

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered October 8, 1998, which, *inter alia,*denied plaintiffs motion to set aside the jury verdict in this personal injury action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The jury verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see, Pena v New York City Tr. Auth.,*185 AD2d 794), and, accordingly, plaintiffs motion to set it aside was properly denied. There was ample basis for the jury to conclude fairly that, although plaintiff had been in a serious accident and was unable to work for a time, he was not deserving of an award for pain and suffering. Plaintiffs claim of inconsistency of the verdict is unpreserved *(Grzesiak v General Elec. Co.,*68 NY2d 937). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Friedman, JJ.
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 85

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. HONORING FRANK W. BUCKLES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Rotunda of the Capitol is au5 thorized to be used at any time on June 18, 2008 for a 

6 ceremony to honor the only living veteran of the First 

7 World War, Mr. Frank Woodruff Buckles, as a tribute 

8 and recognition of all United States military members who 

9 served in the First World War. 

10 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—Physical preparations for 

11 the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with such 

12 conditions as he Architect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Passed the Senate May 22, 2008. 

Attest:

Secretary. 
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 85

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol 

United States veteran of the First World War.to honor Frank W. Buckles, the last surviving
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Employer Expenditures for Selected Supplementary Remuneration Practices for Production Workers in Mining Industries, 1960

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Employer Expenditures for Selected Supplementary Remuneration Practices for Production Workers in Mining Industries, 1960 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1332*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										March 1963,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4717,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
[No. 20503-7-III.

Division Three.

October 31, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Terrel Winslow Moses, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 01-1-00913-9, Michael W. Leavitt, J., entered August 30,2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kato, A.C.J., concurred in by Sweeney and Kurtz, JJ.
IIA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 3 

To specify an expiration date for the authorization of use of military force 

under the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 and to authorize the continuing presence of United States 

forces in Iraq after that date for certain military operations and activities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2007 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

To specify an expiration date for the authorization of use 

of military force under the Authorization for Use of 

Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 and to 

authorize the continuing presence of United States forces 

in Iraq after that date for certain military operations 

and activities. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•SJ 3 IS 

1 SECTION 1. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF 

2 MILITARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ. 

3 The authority conveyed by the Authorization for Use 

4 of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public 

5 Law 107–243) shall expire on December 31, 2007, unless 

6 otherwise provided in a Joint Resolution (other than Pub7 lic Law 107–243) enacted by Congress. 

8 SEC. 2. ALLOWANCE FOR CERTAIN MILITARY OPERATIONS 

9 AND ACTIVITIES. 

10 Section 1 shall not be construed as prohibiting or lim11 iting the presence of personnel or units of the Armed 

12 Forces of the United States in Iraq after December 31, 

13 2007, for the following purposes: 

14 (1) Training, equipping, and advising Iraqi se15 curity and police forces. 

16 (2) Force protection and security for United 

17 States Armed Forces and civilian personnel. 

18 (3) Support of Iraqi security forces for border 

19 security and protection, to be carried out with the 

20 minimum forces required for that purpose. 

21 (4) Targeted counter-terrorism operations 

22 against al Qaeda and foreign fighters within Iraq. 

23 (5) Logistical support in connection with activi24 ties under paragraphs (1) through (4). 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard R. Walters, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company.    /s/ Richard R. Walters DATE:  June 29, 2006 Richard R. Walters, President   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and will be retained by Little Squaw Gold Mining Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.25


 


Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc.


 


Description of Annual Bonus Plan for Key
Executives


 


The Annual Bonus Plan for Key Executives (the “Plan”)
is an annual incentive plan designed to target specific financial and non-financial objectives that directly contribute to the
overall success of Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”), and to motivate and reward participants
to achieve those objectives. Some of these objectives target absolute performance for a year, some target performance against a
peer group and some target year-over-year results, in each case evaluated based on specific performance goals. Under the Plan,
participants may receive an annual bonus of up to 25% of base salary.


 


The Company’s Compensation Committee and Board of Directors
have identified the following categories of objectives, upon which to evaluate the performance of participants in the Plan: (i)
risk management; (ii) financial reporting; (iii) budget compliance; (iv) asset quality; (v) asset growth; (vi) net income growth;
and (vii) critical factors, consisting of performance factors tailored to each individual participant in the Plan. At the beginning
of each year the Compensation Committee determines (a) the individuals eligible to participate in the Plan, (b) the weighting among
the Plan’s objective categories for the Chief Executive Officer, and (c) the specific performance goals that will apply to
the Chief Executive Officer for each category under the Plan. Also at the beginning of each year, the Chief Executive Officer determines
for all other participants in the Plan the weighting among the Plan’s objective categories and the specific performance goals.


 


After each completed year, performance against the Plan’s
objectives is evaluated by the Compensation Committee for the Chief Executive Officer’s performance, and by the Chief Executive
Officer for performance of all other Plan participants. The Chief Executive Officer proposes bonus payments under the Plan for
all Plan participants other than himself, and the Compensation Committee reviews the performance of each Plan participant and determines
and approves all bonus payments under the Plan. Although the calculation of a bonus is based on analysis of performance against
the specific goals under the Plan, the Compensation Committee retains ultimate discretion to pay higher or lower bonuses than what
would be earned by performance against the Plan’s identified performance objectives, or to pay no bonuses to Plan participants
for a particular performance year.


 


Bonuses earned under the Plan are paid in cash during the first
quarter of the year following the performance year.
#### § 500.81 Payment of wages when due.

Each farm labor contractor, agricultural employer and agricultural association which employs any migrant or seasonal agricultural worker must pay the wages owed such worker when due. In meeting this responsibility, the farm labor contractor, agricultural employer and agricultural association shall pay the worker no less often than every two weeks (or semi-monthly).
§ 458.63 Complaints alleging violations of § 458.29, election of officers. ( a ) A member of a labor organization may file a complaint alleging violations of § 458.29 within 1 calendar month after he has ( 1 ) exhausted the remedies available under the constitution and bylaws of the labor organization and of any parent body, or
( 2 ) invoked such available remedies without obtaining a final decision within 3 calendar months of such invocation.
( b ) The complaint shall contain a clear and concise statement of the facts constituting the alleged violation(s), the remedies which have been invoked under the constitution and bylaws of the labor organization and when such remedies were invoked.
( c ) The complainant shall submit with his complaint a copy of any ruling or decision he has received in connection with the subject matter of his complaint.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Health and Insurance Plans Under Collective Bargaining : Surgical and Medical Benefits, Late Summer 1959

              																	Kittner, Dorothy Ruth					 and 	Davis, Harry E. (Harry Edward). 						*Health and Insurance Plans Under Collective Bargaining : Surgical and Medical Benefits, Late Summer 1959 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1280*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										November 1960,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4555,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         164,156
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  113,105
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     52,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               331,882
<PP&E>                                          50,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,167
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 457,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,948
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,839,665
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   386,749
<SALES>                                        203,727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               203,727
<CGS>                                         (106,113)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (106,113)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (261,278)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (163,664)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (163,664)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (163,664)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (163,664)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.37)



</TABLE>