alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**
**LifePoint Hospitals, Inc.**
**Certification**
I, Michael J. Culotta, certify that:
        1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LifePointHospitals, Inc.;
        2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
        3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
        4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
             a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
             b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report, based on such evaluation; and
             c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
        5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
             a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
             b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: April 28, 2004     /s/ Michael J. Culotta  Michael J. Culotta Chief Financial Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

T.J.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee,

No. 2D22-2118

September 1, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Lawrence M. 

Lefler, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Caroline Joan S. Picart, 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Natalia ReynaPimiento, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

SLEET, Chief Judge.

T.J. challenges the trial court's juvenile disposition order in which 

the court found him guilty of committing the delinquent acts of minor in 

possession of a firearm (count one) and resisting arrest without violence 

(count two). T.J. argues, and the State concedes, that the trial court 

erred in imposing a $65 fee under section 939.185, Florida Statutes 
2

(2022), without a citation to a county ordinance. We affirm the 

disposition order in all respects; however, we remand to the trial court 

for the limited purpose of correcting the order assessing fines and costs 

to reflect the applicable county ordinance. See Summers v. State, 276 

So. 3d 1012, 1013 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019); see also Dibelka v. State, 326 So. 

3d 835, 837-38 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021). 

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

VILLANTI and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
(75 South. 1006)

#### PLOTT v. PRICE et al.

(6 Div. 210.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 19, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lamar County; A. S. iVan de Graaf, Judge.

Walter Nesmith, of Vernon, for appellant. Kelley & Young and J. C. Milner, all of Vernon, for appellees.

P'ER CURIAM.

Appeal abated by death of appellant. No revivor.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 22 

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory 

Committee should recommend to the Postmaster General that a commemorative postage stamp be issued to promote public awareness of 

Down syndrome. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2007 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Mr. COCHRAN) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Citizens’ 

Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend to the 

Postmaster General that a commemorative postage 

stamp be issued to promote public awareness of Down 

syndrome. 

Whereas Down syndrome affects people of all races and economic levels; 

Whereas Down syndrome is the most frequently occurring 

chromosomal abnormality; 

Whereas 1 in every 800 to 1,000 children is born with Down 

syndrome; 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•SCON 22 IS 

Whereas more than 350,000 people in the United States have 

Down syndrome; 

Whereas 5,000 children with Down syndrome are born each 

year; 

Whereas as the mortality rate associated with Down syndrome in the United States decreases, the prevalence of 

individuals with Down syndrome in the United States will 

increase; 

Whereas some experts project that the number of people with 

Down syndrome will double by 2013; 

Whereas individuals with Down syndrome are becoming increasingly integrated into society and community organizations, such as schools, health care systems, work forces, 

and social and recreational activities; 

Whereas more and more people in the United States interact 

with individuals with Down syndrome, increasing the 

need for widespread public acceptance and education; and 

Whereas a greater understanding of Down syndrome and advancements in treatment of Down syndrome-related 

health problems have allowed people with Down syndrome 

to enjoy fuller and more active lives: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that— 

3 (1) the United States Postal Service should 

4 issue a commemorative postage stamp to promote 

5 public awareness of Down syndrome; and 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•SCON 22 IS 

1 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee 

2 should recommend to the Postmaster General that 

3 such a stamp be issued. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Airspace Docket No. 2000-ASW-10]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

This notice confirms the effective date of a direct final rule which revises Class D Airspace at Alexandria England AFB, LA; revokes Class D Airspace at Alexandria Esler Regional Airport, LA; and revises Class E Airspace at Alexandria, LA.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

The direct final rule published at 65 FR 15860 is effective 0901 UTC, August 10, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Donald J. Day, Airspace Branch, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region, Federal Aviation Administration, Fort Worth, TX 76193-0520, telephone: 817-222-5593. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 24, 2000, (65 FR 15860). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on August 10, 2000. No adverse comments were received, and, thus, this action confirms that this direct final rule will be effective on that date.                

Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 16, 2000.

JoEllen Casilio,

Assistant Manager, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region.

[FR Doc. 00-13176 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
----

----

I Meddelelser

Revisionsretten

----

DEN UAFHÆNGIGE REVISORS BERETNING OM REVISIONSRETTENS REGNSKABERFOR REGNSKABSÅRET 2003

(2004/C 286/01)

ORIENTERINGTIL LÆSERNE

Uden at det i øvrigt indskrænkerartikel 248 i traktaten om oprettelse af Det Europæiske Fællesskab,hvor Revisionsretten får pålagt ansvaret for at revidere regnskaberneover samtlige Fællesskabets indtægter og udgifter, og nævntetraktats artikel 276 om dechargeafgørelsen, har Revisionsrettensiden afslutningen af regnskabsåret 1987 hvert år fåetregnskaberne over sin interne administrative forvaltning revideret af en uafhængigrevisor.

Revisionsrettens uafhængige revisors beretninger om Rettensregnskaber for regnskabsårene 1987-1991 blev kun sendt til formandenfor Europa-Parlamentets Budgetkontroludvalg.

I overensstemmelse meden afgørelse, som kollegiet af Revisionsrettens medlemmer vedtog påmødet den 8. juli 1993, er denuafhængige revisors beretninger blevet offentliggjort i DenEuropæiske Unions Tidende siden regnskabsåret 1992.

På Revisionsrettens vegne

JuanManuel FABRA VALLÉS

Formand 

----

----

Revisionsrettens beretning om effektiviteten af Den Europæiske Centralbanks forvaltning i regnskabsåret 2003, med Den Europæiske Centralbanks svar

(2004/C 286/02)

Vedtaget af Revisionsretten i Luxembourg på mødet den 16. september 2004.

På Revisionsrettens vegne

Juan Manuel FABRA VALLÉS

Formand

----
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


LONGVIEW FIBRE COMPANY
LONGVIEW, WASHINGTON

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-14358) and the Registration Statement on Form 
S-8 (No. 33-37836) and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-56620) 
of Longview Fibre Company of our report dated December 8, 1997, which 
appears at Item 8 of Longview Fibre Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K.


\s\ Price Waterhouse LLP
Price Waterhouse LLP

Portland, Oregon
January 27, 1998

Page 31<PAGE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComputational Icing Risk Analysis of the D8 "Double Bubble" AircraftA computational icing risk analysis utilizing LEWICE3D was performed for the D8 Double Bubble aircraft. A variety of discrete drop sizes spanning the Appendix C and O regimes were simulated. For computational efficiency a 50-bin global discretization was produced and projected onto the distributions of interest, eliminating redundant simulations. The trajectory and impingement characteristics for discrete drop diameters were analyzed to help understand the behavior of the water drops in the presence of a complex flow field. The collection efficiency results for the discrete drop diameters were then weighted by their contributions to the total water content of six different continuous distributions and subsequently superposed to approximate these curves. Results indicate that significant variation in impingement exists as a function of drop diameter for complex wing body geometries, and that current discretization practices may be insufficient to accurately predict water collection on certain regions of the aircraft. Results also indicate that the Appendix O distributions, specifically those with considerable water content at large drops, generates water collection patterns that are markedly different from distributions representative of Appendix C.Document ID20180008491Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsPorter, Christopher E.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Potapczuk, Mark G.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredDecember 17, 2018Publication DateDecember 1, 2018Subject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlAeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2018-220006AIAA Paper 2018ý2859GRC-E-DAA-TN61843E-19612Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 081876.02.03.50.08.04Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180008491.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20180006757See AlsoComputational Icing Risk Analysis of the D8 "Double Bubble" Aircraftvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
(78 South. 991)

#### SASSER v. STATE.

(4 Div. 553.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 2, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Covington County; A. B. Foster, Judge.

R. C. Williams, of Dothan, and Marcus J. Fletcher, of Andalusia, for appellant. F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRICKEN, J.

Error confessed, and reversed and remanded.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 30, 2014

p1215

Order 

Clerk

December 30, 2014

147679 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147679

COA: 306951

Wayne CC: 11-004605-FC

ELIJAH DUJAUN KEY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of December 23, 2013, the application for leave to appeal the July 16, 

2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

People v Eliason (Docket No. 147428). On order of the Court, the case having been 

decided on July 8, 2014, sub nom People v Carp, 496 Mich 440 (2014), the application is 

again considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we 

VACATE the sentence of the Wayne Circuit Court on the first-degree murder count, and 

we REMAND this case to the trial court for resentencing on that count under 

MCL 769.25. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Ari Muljana, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (a) | that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Manas
      Petroleum Corporation, for the period ended March 31, 2009, fully complies
      with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (b) | that information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the issuer.                                                                         

Date: July 23, 2009

/s/ Ari MuljanaAri MuljanaChief Financial
Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Manas Petroleum
Corporation and will be retained by Manas Petroleum Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 196 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 196

 Commending Idaho on winning the bid to host the 2009 Special Olympics 
                          World Winter Games.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 2007

   Mr. Crapo (for himself, Mr. Craig, and Mr. Stevens) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

                           December 10, 2008

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commending Idaho on winning the bid to host the 2009 Special Olympics 
                          World Winter Games.

Whereas Special Olympics is an international nonprofit organization that 
        promotes personal development through sports training and competition;
Whereas Special Olympics advances the understanding of intellectual disabilities 
        in the community and the Nation through participation and fellowship;
Whereas Special Olympics serves more than 2,500,000 individuals with 
        intellectual disabilities;
Whereas Special Olympics offers more than 200 programs in over 160 countries;
Whereas Special Olympics offers 30 Olympic-type summer and winter sports to both 
        children and adults with intellectual disabilities;
Whereas Boise, Idaho won the international bid to host the 2009 Special Olympics 
        World Winter Games to be held February 6 through 13, 2009;
Whereas thousands of athletes are expected to compete in the 2009 Special 
        Olympics World Winter Games; and
Whereas the 2009 Special Olympics World Winter Games will be the largest multi-
        sport event ever held in the State of Idaho: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) applauds the goals and principles of Special Olympics;
            (2) salutes the athletes, coaches, family members, friends, 
        and volunteers that make Special Olympics possible; and
            (3) congratulates the State of Idaho on its selection as 
        the host for the 2009 Special Olympics World Winter Games.
                                 <all>
```
Opinion issued April 1, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 13
- 01017
- CV

——————————— GEORGE NATHANIEL WYC HE , Appellant

V. GLADIS GOR D ON RIDEAUX , Appellee
On Appeal from the 125 th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2012
- 13112

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant , George Nathaniel Wyche , ha s failed to timely file a brief. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.6( a ) ( governing time to file brief ), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(b) (allowing2

involuntary dismissal of case). We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. We dismis s any pending motions as moot

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland and Brown

.
§ 2200.20 Party status. ( a ) *Affected employees.* ( 1 ) Affected employees and authorized employee representatives may elect party status concerning any matter in which the Act confers a right to participate. The election shall be accomplished by filing a written notice of election at least 14 days before the hearing. A notice of election filed less than 14 days prior to the hearing is ineffective unless good cause is shown for not timely filing the notice.
( 2 ) A notice of election shall be served on all other parties in accordance with § 2200.7.
( b ) *Employees no longer employed by cited employer.* An employee of a cited employer who was exposed to or had access to the hazard arising out of the allegedly violative circumstances, conditions, practices, or operations and who is no longer employed by the cited employer is permitted to participate as a party.
( c ) *Employee contest.* ( 1 ) Where a notice of contest is filed by an employee or by an authorized employee representative with respect to the reasonableness of the period for abatement of a violation, the employer charged with the responsibility of abating the violation may elect party status by a notice filed at least 14 days before the hearing.
( 2 ) A notice of election shall be served on all other parties in accordance with § 2200.7.
Exhibit 32








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bear Lake Recreation, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), we, Wayne Bassham, Principal Executive Officer, and Todd Albiston, Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.







Date:
January 28, 2011

By:
/s/Wayne BasshamWayne Bassham, Principal Executive Officer





Date:
January 28, 2011

By:
/s/Todd AlbistonTodd Albiston, Principal Financial Officer