alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EUROTECH,
LTD. BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          27,394
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,771
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,876
<PP&E>                                           4,576
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,251
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,608
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,239
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,251
<SALES>                                         27,990
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,990
<CGS>                                           18,903
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  97
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (18,843)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (18,843)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (18,843)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.90)


</TABLE>
§ 38.8 Discrimination prohibited based on pregnancy. Discrimination on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, including childbearing capacity, is a form of sex discrimination and a violation of the nondiscrimination provisions of WIOA and this part. Recipients may not treat persons of childbearing capacity, or those affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, adversely in accessing any aid, benefit, service, or training under a WIOA Title I-financially assisted program or activity. In their covered employment practices, recipients must treat people of childbearing capacity and those affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions the same for all employment-related purposes, including receipt of benefits under fringe-benefit programs, as other persons not so affected but similar in their ability or inability to work. Related medical conditions include, but are not limited to: Lactation; disorders directly related to pregnancy, such as preeclampsia (pregnancy-induced high blood pressure), placenta previa, and gestational diabetes; symptoms such as back pain; complications requiring bed rest; and the after-effects of a delivery. A pregnancy-related medical condition may also be a disability. See § 38.4(q)(3)(ii). Examples of unlawful pregnancy discrimination may include: ( a ) Refusing to provide any aid, benefit, service, or training under a WIOA Title I-financially assisted program or activity to a pregnant individual or an individual of childbearing capacity, or otherwise subjecting such individuals to adverse treatment on the basis of pregnancy or childbearing capacity;
( b ) Limiting an individual's access to any aid, benefit, service, or training under a WIOA Title I-financially assisted program or activity based on her pregnancy, or requiring a doctor's note in order for a pregnant woman to begin or continue participation while pregnant when doctors' notes are not required for participants who are similarly situated;
( c ) Denying an individual access to any aid, benefit, service, or training under a WIOA Title I-financially assisted program or activity or requiring the individual to terminate participation in any WIOA Title I-financially assisted program or activity when the individual becomes pregnant or has a child; and
( d ) Denying reasonable accommodations or modifications of policies, practices, or procedures to a pregnant applicant or participant who is temporarily unable to participate in some portions of a WIOA Title I-financially assisted program or activity because of pregnancy, childbirth, and/or related medical conditions, when such accommodations or modifications are provided, or are required to be provided, by a recipient's policy or by other relevant laws, to other similarly situated applicants or participants.
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

§ 4.191 Complaints and compliance assistance. ( a ) Any employer, employee, labor or trade organization, contracting agency, or other interested person or organization may report to any office of the Wage and Hour Division (or to any office of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, in instances involving the safety and health provisions), a violation, or apparent violation, of the Act, or of any of the rules or regulations prescribed thereunder. Such offices are also available to assist or provide information to contractors or subcontractors desiring to insure that their practices are in compliance with the Act. Information furnished is treated confidentially. It is the policy of the Department of Labor to protect the identity of its confidential sources and to prevent an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Accordingly, the identity of an employee who makes a confidential written or oral statement as a complaint or in the course of an investigation, as well as portions of the statement which would reveal his identity, will not be disclosed without the prior consent of the employee. Disclosure of employee statements shall be governed by the provisions of the “Freedom of Information Act” (5 U.S.C. 552, see 29 CFR part 70) and the “Privacy Act of 1974” (5 U.S.C. 552a).
( b ) A report of breach or violation relating solely to safety and health requirements may be in writing and addressed to the Regional Administrator of an Occupational Safety and Health Administration Regional Office, U.S. Department of Labor, or to the Assistant Secretary for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210.
( c ) Any other report of breach or violation may be in writing and addressed to the Assistant Regional Administrator of a Wage and Hour Division's regional office, U.S. Department of Labor, or to the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210.
( d ) In the event that an Assistant Regional Administrator for the Wage and Hour Division, is notified of a breach or violation which also involves safety and health standards, the Regional Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division shall notify the appropriate Regional Administrator of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration who shall with respect to the safety and health violations take action commensurate with his responsibilities pertaining to safety and health standards.
( e ) Any report should contain the following: ( 1 ) The full name and address of the person or organization reporting the breach or violations.
( 2 ) The full name and address of the person against whom the report is made.
( 3 ) A clear and concise statement of the facts constituting the alleged breach or violation of any of the provisions of the McNamara-O'Hara Service Contract Act, or of any of the rules or regulations prescribed thereunder.
[48 FR 49762, Oct. 27, 1983, as amended at 82 FR 2225, Jan. 9, 2017]
Exhibit 10.1


 





Service Agreement 


 


This Service Agreement (this “Agreement”)
has been made and entered into by and between Link Bit Consulting Co., Ltd. (the “Customer”), and Cheval Attache Co.,
Ltd. (the “Service Provider”), as follows.


 


Article 1.     Entrustment of Services


The Customer entrusts the Service Provider
with the following services and the Service Provider accepts the entrustment.


		(1)	Planning, producing, distributing, marketing and consulting relating to digital contents.



		(2)	Planning, producing, distributing, marketing and consulting relating to smartphone application
software.



		(3)	Other services relating to the forgoing



 


Article 2.     Service Fees


The service fees shall be 1million yen per
month (exclusive of consumption tax). The Customer shall pay the fees for each month by the end of the current month by remittance
to the account designated by the Service Provider.


 


Article 3.     Confidentiality


The Service provider may not use or divulge
to any third party any confidential information of the Customer that comes to its knowledge including the Customer’s client
information and management methods through the execution and performance of this Agreement.


 


Article 4.     Reporting


If the Customer requests, the Service Provider
shall promptly report information on the entrusted matters.


 


Article 5.     Term


The effective term of this Agreement shall
be from August 1, 2014 to July 31, 2015. If neither party expresses a specific intention at least three months prior to the expiration
of the term, this Agreement shall be extended for an additional one-year period with the same conditions, and the same shall apply
thereafter.


 


Article
6.     Consultation


Any matters not stipulated hereunder or any
questions about the interpretation of this Agreement shall be resolved upon consultation between the parties hereto in good faith.


 






    	1



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, both parties hereto have
executed this Agreement in duplicate with their signatures and seals, and each party shall retain one copy.


 


 


August 1, 2014


 


Customer:


1-16-1 Kaigan, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan


Link Bit Consulting Co., Ltd.


Takashi Ozawa, Representative Director


 


Service Provider:


2-10-1 Azabujuban , Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan


Sheval Attache Co., Ltd.


Akira Tanabe, Representative Director


 


 


 


 


 


 






    	2
Exhibit 31.1

   Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
 Capital Solutions 1, Inc. pursuant to Section of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Christopher Astrom, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of Capital Solutions 1, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: September 12, 2006

/s/ CHRISTOPHER ASTROM
---------------------------
Christopher Astrom
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
# AGENCY:

 Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

 Final rule. 

# SUMMARY:

 This document allots Channel 254A at Seymour, Texas, in response to a petition filed by Seymour Broadcasting Company. See 64 FR 57835, October 27, 1999. The coordinates for Channel 254A at Seymour are 33-29-57 NL and 99-15-06 WL. There is a site restriction 10.1 kilometers (6.3 miles) south of the community. With this action, this proceeding is terminated. A filing window for Channel 254A at Seymour will not be opened at this time. Instead, the issue of opening a filing window for this channel will be addressed by the Commission in a subsequent order. 

# DATES:

 Effective February 22, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 This is a summary of the Commission's Report and Order, MM Docket No. 99-303, adopted December 29, 1999 and released January 7, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805. 

# List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

- Radio broadcasting

Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: 

# PART 73—[AMENDED] 

1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows: 

Authority:47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336. 

§ 73.202 

2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Texas, is amended by adding Channel 254A at Seymour. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 00-1265 Filed 1-19-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Exhibit 32Knova Software, Inc. Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act — filed as anexhibit to 10-K/A for Year Ended December 31, 2004CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the Annual Report of Knova Software, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for theperiod ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Bruce Armstrong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,and Thomas Muise, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:  1.          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   2.          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Bruce Armstrong /s/ Thomas Muise   Bruce Armstrong Thomas MuisePrincipal Executive Officer Principal Financial OfficerJanuary 17, 2006 January 17, 2006*The foregoing Certification shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any generalstatement incorporating by reference this report into any filing under the Securities Act of1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that we specificallyincorporate this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed undersuch Acts.*
35
#### § 37.24 Who is eligible to serve as an Equal Opportunity Officer?

A senior-level employee of the recipient should be appointed as the recipient's Equal Opportunity Officer. Depending upon the size of the recipient, the size of the recipient's WIA Title I-financially assisted programs or activities, and the number of applicants, registrants, and participants served by the recipient, the EO Officer may, or may not, be assigned other duties. However, he or she must not have other responsibilities or activities that create a conflict, or the appearance of a conflict, with the responsibilities of an EO Officer.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Marine Petroleum Trust (the Company), does hereby
certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004 (the Form
10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K. /s/ R. RAY BELL  
 Dated: September 24, 2004 The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K
pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part
of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Marine Petroleum Trust and will be retained by Marine Petroleum
Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[670 NE2d 440, 647 NYS2d 156]

#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Lorraine Brown, Respondent.

Decided July 2, 1996

*945APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Richard A. Brown, District Attorney*of Queens County, Kew Gardens *(Robin A. Forshaw*of counsel), for appellant.

*Schwed & Zucker,*Kew Gardens *(David G. Zucker*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for consideration of the facts pursuant to CPL 470.25 (2) (d) and 470.40 (2) (b). The trial court did not place defendant on illegal "interim probation” by postponing defendant’s sentence after her plea of guilty and placing her with a private drug treatment program *(see, People v Avery,*85 NY2d 503; *People v Smith,*85 NY2d 919).

*946Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick.
§ 501.33 Request for hearing. ( a ) Any person desiring review of a determination referred to in § 501.32, including judicial review, shall make a written request for an administrative hearing to the official who issued the determination at the WHD address appearing on the determination notice, no later than 30 calendar days after the date of issuance of the notice referred to in § 501.32.
( b ) No particular form is prescribed for any request for hearing permitted by this part. However, any such request shall: ( 1 ) Be typewritten or legibly written;
( 2 ) Specify the issue or issues stated in the notice of determination giving rise to such request (any issues not raised in the request may be deemed waived);
( 3 ) State the specific reason or reasons the person requesting the hearing believes such determination is in error;
( 4 ) Be signed by the person making the request or by an authorized representative of such person; and
( 5 ) Include the address at which such person or authorized representative desires to receive further communications relating thereto.
( c ) The request for such hearing must be received by the official who issued the determination, at the WHD address appearing on the determination notice, within the time set forth in paragraph (a) of this section. Requests may be made by certified mail or by means normally assuring overnight delivery.
( d ) The determination shall take effect on the start date identified in the written notice of determination, unless an administrative appeal is properly filed. The timely filing of an administrative appeal stays the determination pending the outcome of the appeal proceedings, provided that any surety bond remains in effect until the conclusion of any such proceedings.
[87 FR 61822, Oct. 12, 2022, as amended at 89 FR 34068, Apr. 29, 2024]
791 A.2d 1168

#### David and Leontine COLVILLE, Husband and Wife, Respondents, v. CROWN EQUIPMENT CORPORATION and Ominilift, Incorporated, Petitioners.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

March 20, 2002.

*62
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of March, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Superior Court erred in holding that petitioners’ request for a jury instruction on crashworthiness was waived. *See*Pa. R. C.P. 227(b) (“[a]ll exceptions to charge to jury shall be taken before jury retires.”); *compare McNeil v. Owens-Coming Fiberglas Corp.,*545 Pa. 209, 680 A.2d 1145, 1148-49 (1996) (issue of whether trial court failed to instruct jury in accordance with proposed points for charge waived where party failed to lodge specific objection to charge). *See also*Pa. R.A.P. 302(b). Accordingly, the order and judgment of the Superior Court is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for consideration of the merits of petitioners’ claim that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the crashworthiness doctrine.
#### § 4003.31 Who may request reconsideration.

Any person aggrieved by an initial determination of PBGC to which this subpart applies may request reconsideration of the initial determination.

[61 FR 34012, July 1, 1996, as amended at 85 FR 10284, Feb. 24, 2020]