alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32000D0238 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000D0238

**2000/238/EC: Commission Decision of 9 March 2000 amending Decision 97/830/EC as regards points of entry for Germany (notified under document number C(2000) 501) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 075 , 24/03/2000 P. 0059 - 0061 *

Commission Decision

of 9 March 2000

amending Decision 97/830/EC as regards points of entry for Germany

(notified under document number C(2000) 501)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2000/238/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 93/43/EEC of 14 June 1993 on the hygiene of foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 10(1) thereof,

After consulting the Member States,

Whereas:

(1) The Commission, in Decision 97/830/EC(2), as amended by Decision 98/400/EC(3), adopted measures imposing special conditions on the importation of pistachios and certain products derived from pistachios originating in, or consigned from Iran.

(2) It is necessary to add to Annex II to Decision 97/830/EC two more points of entry for Germany through which those pistachios and products may be imported.

(3) For the sake of clarity, therefore, Annex II should be replaced,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex II to Decision 97/830/EC is replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 March 2000.

For the Commission

Erkki Liikanen

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 175, 19.7.1993, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 343, 13.12.1997, p. 30.

(3) OJ L 176, 20.6.1998, p. 37.

ANNEX

"ANNEX II

List of points of entry through which pistachios and products derived from pistachios originating in, or consigned from Iran may be imported into the European Community

>TABLE>"
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET OF LILLY  INDUSTRIES,  INC. AT NOVEMBER 30, 1997 AND THE
CONSOLIDATED  CONDENSED  STATEMENT OF INCOME OF LILLY  INDUSTRIES,  INC. FOR THE
YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1,000
       
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                  NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                                          10,079
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   82,150
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     2,139
<INVENTORY>                                                     45,704
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               146,674
<PP&E>                                                         137,088
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  54,249
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 501,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           94,548
<BONDS>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                        95,092
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      47,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   501,795
<SALES>                                                        601,296
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               601,296
<CGS>                                                          373,015
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  531,162
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   346
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              19,317
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 51,163
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    23,068
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    28,095
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     1.20
        


</TABLE>
```

[115th Congress Public Law 249]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 3162]]

Public Law 115-249
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for the protection of 
      community centers with religious affiliation, and for other 
             purposes. <<NOTE: Sept. 28, 2018 -  [S. 994]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Protecting 
Religiously Affiliated Institutions Act of 2018. 18 USC 1 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Religiously Affiliated 
Institutions Act of 2018''.
SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF COMMUNITY CENTERS WITH RELIGIOUS 
                    AFFILIATION.

    Section 247 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting after ``threat of 
        force,'' the following: ``including by threat of force against 
        religious real property,'';
            (2) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 
                inserting ``or (c)'' after ``subsection (a)'';
                    (B) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (C) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); 
                and
                    (D) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
            ``(4) if damage to or destruction of property results from 
        the acts committed in violation of this section, which damage to 
        or destruction of such property is in an amount that exceeds 
        $5,000, a fine in accordance with this title, imprisonment for 
        not more than 3 years, or both; and''; and

[[Page 132 STAT. 3163]]

            (3) in subsection (f), by inserting before the period at the 
        end the following: ``, or real property owned or leased by a 
        nonprofit, religiously affiliated organization''.

    Approved September 28, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 994 (H.R. 1730):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115-456 (Comm. on the Judiciary) accompanying 
H.R. 1730.
SENATE REPORTS: No. 115-325 (Comm. on the Judiciary).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Sept. 4, considered and passed Senate.
            Sept. 7, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 516.18 Employees employed in certain tobacco, cotton, sugar cane or sugar beet services, who are partially exempt from overtime pay requirements pursuant to section 7(m), 13(h), 13(i) or 13(j) of the Act.

With respect to each employee providing services in connection with certain types of green leaf or cigar leaf tobacco, cotton, cottonseed, cotton ginning, sugar cane, sugar processing or sugar beets who are partially exempt from the overtime pay requirements of the Act pursuant to 7(m), 13(h), 13(i) or 13(j), the employer shall, in addition to the records required in § 516.2, maintain and preserve a record of the daily and weekly overtime compensation paid. Also, the employer shall note in the payroll records the beginning date of each workweek during which the establishment operates under the particular exemption.
#### § 511.19 Petitions.

Any interested person may at any time file a petition with the Administrator for an amendment to the regulations contained in this part or for an amendment to a wage order applicable to that person. In view of the statutory requirement that the minimum rates of wages established by order under section 6 of the Act be reviewed by an industry committee at least biennially, substantial cause must be shown in support of any petition for an amendment of a wage order out of regular course. Any interested person may also file a petition at any time with the Administrator for a public hearing under section 13(e) of the Act to determine whether economic conditions warrant rules or regulations providing reasonable limitations or allowing reasonable variations, tolerances, or exemptions to or from any or all of the provisions of section 7 of the Act with respect to employees in American Samoa for whom the Secretary of Labor has established minimum wage rates under section 6(a)(3) of the Act and the regulations contained in this part. Whenever it appears to the Secretary of Labor, by reason of such a petition or otherwise, to be probable that such a hearing is likely to reveal that economic conditions warrant such action, notice of such hearing specifying the procedure to be followed will be published in the Federal Register.

[55 FR 53300, Dec. 28, 1990]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 20 (Monday, January 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 5432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2003]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Enhanced-Use Lease (EUL) of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 
Real Property at the Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center (VAMC) in 
Augusta, GA

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to Enter into an Enhanced-Use Lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of VA intends to enter into an EUL on an 11.5-
acre parcel of land at the Charlie Norwood VAMC. The selected lessee 
will finance, design, develop, renovate, manage, maintain and operate 
the EUL development. As consideration for the lease, the lessee will be 
required to renovate, operate, and maintain a transitional and 
permanent housing facility; provide preference and priority placement 
for homeless Veterans and Veterans at risk of homelessness; and provide 
a supportive services program that guides resident Veterans toward 
attaining long-term self-sufficiency.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward Bradley, Office of Asset 
Enterprise Management (044), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-7778 (this is not 
a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title 38 U.S.C. 8161 et seq. states that the 
Secretary may enter into an enhanced-use lease if he determines that 
implementation of a business plan proposed by the Under Secretary for 
Health for applying the consideration under such a lease for the 
provision of medical care and services would result in a demonstrable 
improvement of services to eligible Veterans in the geographic service-
delivery area within which the property is located. This project meets 
this requirement.

    Approved: January 24, 2011.
John R. Gingrich,
Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2011-2003 Filed 1-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
#### Joseph N. Early et al., Appellants and Respondents, *v.*Carl W. Funk et al., Respondents and Appellants, Impleaded with Another.

Argued June 3, 1937;

decided July 13, 1937.

*496
      *Alvin C. Cass*and *Jacques W. Bacal*for plaintiffs, appellants and respondents.

*Warren A. Schenck*for defendants, respondents and appellants.

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
10.2 Fokko Agmt










FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


WHEREAS, Amtech Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) and Fokko Pentinga (the “Executive”) entered into an Employment Agreement dated June 29, 2012 (with all subsequent amendments thereto, the “Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to enter into this Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Fourth Amendment”) in order to (i) increase the Executive’s base salary to US$407,000, or €343,055, per annum, (ii) increase the amount of D&O liability insurance maintained by the Company for the benefit of the Executive to $10,000,000, and (iii) modify the Executive’s annual car allowance benefit to provide that the Company shall offer the Executive either a leased automobile or an automobile allowance at a cost to the Company of not more than €29,500 per annum.


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following amendment to the Agreement, to be effective as of the date set forth below, with all unmodified portions of the Agreement to remain in full force and effect:


		
	1.
	The first sentence in Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:  “For services rendered to the Company during the term of this Agreement, including services rendered as a Director of the Company or any of its affiliates, the Company shall compensate the Executive with an annual base salary of US$407,000, or €343,055, per annum, based on a six month average exchange rate fixed one day before the effective date of this Agreement.”


		
	2.
	The antepenultimate sentence in Section 5 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: “The Company shall also provide the Executive with a leased automobile or an automobile allowance at a cost of not more than €29,500 per annum.”


		
	3.
	In the first sentence of Section 15, the reference to “$1,000,000” shall be replaced with “$10,000,000”.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Fourth Amendment as of April 9, 2015.


AMTECH SYSTEMS, INC.


By:  /s/ Bradley C. Anderson       
Name: Bradley C. Anderson
Title:     Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer






By: /s/ Fokko Pentinga
Name: Fokko Pentinga
Title: Executive
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of

HORIZON BANCORPORATION, INC.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc., hereby certifies that:

1. Horizon Bancorporation, Inc's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc.

/S/ James J. BazataJames J. Bazata
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

May 7, 2004
#### MARIETTA CHAIR COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. 44192.

Decided May 7, 1945]

*Mr. William E.*Carey, Jr., for plaintiff. *Mr. Fred B. Rhodes*was on the brief.

*Mr. Clay R. Apple,*with whom was *Mr. Assistant Attorney General Francis M.*Shea, for the defendant.

*768The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover in an opinion *per*curiam, as follows:

*Per Curiam:*

Plaintiff sues to recover increased costs alleged to have been caused by the enactment of the National Industrial Eecovery Act (48 Stat. 195). Its proof is wholly insufficient to show the amount of the increase so far as labor ■■costs are concerned. It shows the number of “pay hours” ..of labor performed in carrying out the contracts, but does *769not show the increased wages paid therefor. There is no showing as to what laborers worked on these contracts, nor the amount of the increase in their wages.

The commissioner of the court has computed an average wage increase, but whether or not this average wage should be applied to these contracts we cannot tell from the proof. However, the minimum increase paid plaintiff’s workmen, ■except four who are unaccounted for, was two cents per hour. Plaintiff’s costs must have been increased by this amount, multiplied by the number of “pay hours” spent on the contracts, to wit, 10,104. It results that under the proof plaintiff is entitled to recover the sum of $202.08 for increased labor costs.

The proof fails to show that there was any increase, due to the enactment of the Act, in the cost of the lumber or other materials used in the manufacture of the articles furnished.

Judgment will be entered in favor of plaintiff for $202.08. *It*is so ordered.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Kennedy, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 39]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flaherty, J.), rendered August 2, 1996, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the People failed to prove his guilt by legally sufficient evidence is unpreserved for appellate review because he failed to raise with specificity his claims regarding identification before the trial court *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245).

In any. event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s identity as the perpetrator beyond a reasonable doubt. The complainant observed the defendant face to face in a well-lit area during the robbery and picked him out of a line-up only five days later. Moreover, any inconsistencies between the complainant’s trial testimony, her prior statements, and the defendant’s appearance were explored at trial, and the jury resolved the issue of credibility in favor of the prosecution. Resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84; *People v Williams,*184 AD2d 606; *People v Greene,*184 AD2d 729). The jury’s determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People*
      *239
      *v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86). Upon exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt is not against the weight of evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]). Bracken, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.
#### § 516.34 Exemption from overtime pay for time spent by certain employees receiving remedial education pursuant to section 7(q) of the Act.

With respect to each employee exempt from the overtime pay requirements of the Act for time spent receiving remedial education pursuant to section 7(q) of the Act and § 778.603 of this title, the employer shall maintain and preserve records containing all the information and data required by § 516.2 and, in addition, shall also make and preserve a record, either separately or as a notation on the payroll, showing the hours spent each workday and total hours each workweek that the employee is engaged in receiving such remedial education that does not include any job-specific training but that is designed to provide reading and other basic skills at or below the eighth-grade level or to fulfill the requirements for a high school diploma (or General Educational Development certificate), and the compensation (at not less than the employee's regular rate of pay) paid each pay period for the time so engaged.

[56 FR 61101, Nov. 29, 1991]
S. Con. Res. 61 Agreed to December 19, 2007

One Hundred Tenth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from

Tuesday, December 18, 2007, through Monday, December 31, 2007,

on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its

Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned sine die, or

until such day and time as may be specified in the motion to

recess or adjourn, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant

to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first;

and that when the House adjourns on any legislative day from

Tuesday, December 18, 2007, through Saturday, December 22, 2007,

on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its

Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned sine die, or

until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 3 of this

concurrent resolution.

SEC. 2. When the Senate recesses or adjourns on Thursday,

January 3, 2008, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent

resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it shall stand

recessed or adjourned until noon on Tuesday, January 22, 2008,

or such other time on that day as may be specified in the motion

to recess or adjourn, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant

to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first;

and when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday,

January 3, 2008, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent

resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it shall stand

recessed or adjourned until noon on Tuesday, January 15, 2008,

or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 3 of this

concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.

SEC. 3. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker

of the House, or their respective designees, acting jointly after

consultation with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the

Minority Leader of the House, shall notify Members of the Senate

and the House, respectively, to reassemble at such a place and
S. Con. Res. 61—2

time as they may designate if, in their opinion, the public interest

shall warrant it.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
#### § 4003.10 Computation of time.

PBGC applies the rules in subpart D of part 4000 of this chapter to compute any time period under this part.

[68 FR 61352, Oct. 28, 2003, as amended at 85 FR 10284, Feb. 24, 2020]
Exhibit  99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of Visualant, Incorporated on Form
10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ralph Brier, Chief
Executive  Officer,  President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge  and  belief:

          (1)  the  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

          (2)  the  information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations  of  the  Company.




                                                     "Ralph Brier"
                                                     -------------
                                                       Ralph Brier
                           Chief  Executive  Officer,  President  and  Director

Date: