alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ ̈¦15 

For t P eck Lake 

A Allb be er rtta a

Nat

Glaci

ional Park 

GLACIER Kevin Rim 

er S Sa as sk ka attc ch he ew wa an n

Blackfeet Indian

Reservation Cut

£¤89

Y
 Mount Y Royal 

Browning 

Bank 

Shel

LIBERTY HILL

TOOLE

by £¤2

Chester 

Sheep Coulee 

Y
 

CHOUTEAU
 

66
 

191
 

Antoi Y

£¤ ne

Butte

Fort Benton VALLEY

CCMMRRNNaat

tii

oonnaal

l

WWiil

l

ddlli

i

ffeeRReeffuuggee 

")

£¤87

232 

Y Rose Y Larb Hill

Ft. Belknap Malta Hills Y

Rocky Boy's Indian Reservation Indian Reservation PHILLIPS 

Glasgow 

") BLAINE
 Lori

Y

ng 

Havre 

Chinook YHarlem 

Saco

Hills
 

Created by the Malta Field Office in December 2012 Albers Equal Area, NAD83, Meters 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

HiLine District
 

Rights-of-Way (ROW)

Alternative E (Preferred)
 

Map shows the Transportation/Utility Corridors and Rights-of-Way

Avoidance and Exclusion areas for Alternative E along with the 

existing Communication sites. Corridors are along roadways and 

extend out one-half mile on either side of the center line. 

Map 2.5 

0 25 50 

Y Communication Sites 

Transportation/Utility Corridors 

ROW Exclusion area 

ROW Avoidance area 

RMP Boundary

County

Interstate 

Highway or State Route 

Town 

100

Miles 1:1,500,000 

Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

Bankhead-Jones Land Use Lands 

USDA Forest Service (USFS)

National Park Service (NPS)

®

Bureau of Reclamation 

Indian Reservation 

State 

Private 

US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)

Water 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data

for individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by the BLM.

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed

through digital means and information may be updated without notification. 

! H i L i n e R M P

Kalispell 

!

Great Falls 

! 

^ Lewistown

Helena 

! ! Miles City

Butte !

Billings
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BOYD'S
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FIANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF, AND FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED, SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,811
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,474
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,459
<INVENTORY>                                     14,990
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,646
<PP&E>                                           6,624
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,531
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 285,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,911
<BONDS>                                        212,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      (67,482)
<OTHER-SE>                                     126,151
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   285,330
<SALES>                                        150,871
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,871
<CGS>                                           55,457
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,012
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 63,427
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,149
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             39,278
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    528
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,750
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65


</TABLE>
(76 South. 999)

#### ROEBUCK v. STATE.

(5 Div. 182.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 7, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Chilton County; Leon McCord, Judge.

W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed by appellant.
[No. 48682-9-I.

Division One.

November 12, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Shelton Delawrence Smallwood, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 00-1-06955-0, Larry A. Jordan, J., entered June 14, 2001. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
§ 38.22 Delegation of administration and interpretation of this part. ( a ) The Secretary may from time to time assign to officials of other departments or agencies of the Federal Government (with the consent of such department or agency) responsibilities in connection with the effectuation of the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIOA and this part (other than responsibility for final decisions under § 38.112), including the achievement of effective coordination and maximum uniformity within the Department and within the executive branch of the Government in the application of the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIOA or this part to similar programs and similar situations.
( b ) Any action taken, determination made, or requirement imposed by an official of another department or agency acting under an assignment of responsibility under this section has the same effect as if the action had been taken by the Director.
#### CONSUMERS COAL & ICE CO v BUSCH, et

Ohio Appeals, 2nd Disk Montgomery Co

No 983.

Decided July 2, 1930

Burkhardt, Heald & Pickrel, Dayton, for Coal & Ice Co.

Nolan & Beigel, Cincinnati, for Busch.

Harry M. Wolfe, Dayton for defendant in Error Ray Hess.

BY THE COURT

On July 2nd, 1929 this Court struck from the files said petition in error and dismissed said proceedings in error, as the records of this Court will disclose in Case No. 909. Because the foregoing precludes plaintiff in error from filing a second petition in error and instituting a second proceedings in error.

Second. Because in this second proceedings in error summons in error has not been issued nor service of summons made on this defendant in error nor any waiver of such service of summons in error filed within the time limited by law.

*547We have considered this motion and have also given special attention to the very exhaustive briefs in support of and against the motions which have been filed by counsel.

Without attempting to discuss in detail the authorities cited upon such examination, we are of opinion that the motion is well taken and should be sustained.

Ray Hess of date March 21, 1930 also filed a motion which we think is well taken and may be sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 152 (Monday, August 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 48161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20025]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9449-2 ]


Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) responses to Agency Clearance requests, in compliance with the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). An agency may not 
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a 
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB 
control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA regulations are listed 
in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Westlund (202) 566-1682, or e-
mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#52253721263e273c367c203b3139123722337c353d24"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5f283a2c2b332a313b712d363c341f3a2f3e71383029">[email protected]</span></a> and please refer to the appropriate EPA 
Information Collection Request (ICR) Number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Responses to Agency Clearance Requests

OMB Approvals

    EPA ICR Number 2402.01; Willingness to Pay Survey for Section 
316(b) Existing Facilities Cooling Water Intake Structures; was 
approved on 07/01/2011; OMB Number 2040-0283; expires on 07/31/2013; 
Approved with change.
    EPA ICR Number 1367.09; Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: 
Gasoline Volatility; 40 CFR 80.27; was approved on 07/27/2011; OMB 
Number 2060-0178; expires on 07/31/2014; Approved without change.
    EPA ICR Number 1051.11; NSPS for Portland Cement Plants (40 CFR 
part 60, subpart F) (Renewal); was approved on 07/29/2011; OMB Number 
2060-0025; expires on 07/31/2014; Approved with revisions.
    EPA ICR Number 1767.06; NESHAP for Primary Aluminum Reduction 
Plants (40 CFR part 63, subpart LL) (Renewal); was approved on 07/29/
2011; OMB Number 2060-0360; expires on 07/31/2014; Approved without 
change.

Short Term Approvals

    EPA ICR Number 1704.14: Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Alternate 
Threshold for Low Annual Reportable Amounts (Form A) was granted a 
short term approval to 01/31/2012 on 07/27/2011.
    EPA ICR Number 1425.07: Application for Reimbursement to Local 
Governments for Emergency Response to Hazardous Substance Releases 
Under CERCLA section 123 was granted a short term approval to 10/31/
2011 on 07/25/2011.

    Dated: August 2, 2011.
John Moses,
Director, Collections Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2011-20025 Filed 8-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 452.17 Officer.

Section 3(n) of the Act defines the word “officer” and it is this definition which must be used as a guide in determining what particular positions in a labor organization are to be filled in the manner prescribed in the Act. For purposes of the Act, “officer” means “any constitutional officer, any person authorized to perform the functions of president, vice president, secretary, treasurer, or other executive functions of a labor organization, and any member of its executive board or similar governing body.”
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Glacier
National ParkMontana
§ 2570.91 Definitions. For 502(c)(5) civil penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of the definitions in § 18.2 of this title. ( a ) *Adjudicatory proceeding* means a judicial-type proceeding before an administrative law judge leading to the formulation of a final order;
( b ) *Administrative law judge* means an administrative law judge appointed pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 3105;
( c ) *Answer* means a written statement that is supported by reference to specific circumstances or facts surrounding the notice of determination issued pursuant to 29 CFR 2560.502c-5(g);
( d ) *Commencement of proceeding* is the filing of an answer by the respondent;
( e ) *Consent agreement* means any written document containing a specified proposed remedy or other relief acceptable to the Department and consenting parties;
( f ) *ERISA* means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended;
( g ) *Final order* means the final decision or action of the Department of Labor concerning the assessment of a civil penalty under ERISA section 502(c)(5) against a particular party. Such final order may result from a decision of an administrative law judge or the Secretary, the failure of a party to file a statement of reasonable cause described in 29 CFR 2560.502c-5(e) within the prescribed time limits, or the failure of a party to invoke the procedures for hearings or appeals under this title within the prescribed time limits. Such a final order shall constitute final agency action within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 704;
( h ) *Hearing* means that part of a proceeding which involves the submission of evidence, either by oral presentation or written submission, to the administrative law judge;
( i ) *Order* means the whole or any part of a final procedural or substantive disposition of a matter under ERISA section 502(c)(5);
( j ) *Party* includes a person or agency named or admitted as a party to a proceeding;
( k ) *Person* includes an individual, partnership, corporation, employee benefit plan, association, exchange, or other entity or organization;
( l ) *Petition* means a written request, made by a person or party, for some affirmative action;
( m ) *Pleading* means the notice as defined in 29 CFR 2560.502c-5(g), the answer to the notice, any supplement or amendment thereto, and any reply that may be permitted to any answer, supplement or amendment;
( n ) *502(c)(5) civil penalty proceeding* means an adjudicatory proceeding relating to the assessment of a civil penalty provided for in section 502(c)(5) of ERISA;
( o ) *Respondent* means the party against whom the Department is seeking to assess a civil sanction under ERISA section 502(c)(5);
( p ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of Labor and includes, pursuant to any delegation of authority by the Secretary, any assistant secretary (including the Assistant Secretary for Employee Benefits Security), administrator, commissioner, appellate body, board, or other official of the Department of Labor; and
( q ) *Solicitor* means the Solicitor of Labor or his or her delegate.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13011]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-355-002]


Baltimore Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Filing

May 18, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 1, 2000, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company 
(BGE), and Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Columbia) separately 
filed reports to comply with a Commission order issued July 29, 1999, 
in Docket No. RP99-355-000. The filings report on the parties' efforts 
to develop an unbundling program with BGE that does not require waiver 
of the Commission's shipper must have title policy.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. 
This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-13011 Filed 5-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# EUR-Lex - 32000E0722 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000E0722

**Council Common Position of 20 November 2000 amending Common Position 96/184/CFSP concerning arms exports to the former Yugoslavia **

*
Official Journal L 292 , 21/11/2000 P. 0001 - 0001 *

Council Common Position

of 20 November 2000

amending Common Position 96/184/CFSP concerning arms exports to the former Yugoslavia

(2000/722/CFSP)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 15 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) On 26 February 1996 the Council adopted Common Position 96/184/CFSP concerning arms exports to the former Yugoslavia(1), which was amended by Decisions 98/498/CFSP(2) and 99/481/CFSP(3).

(2) The Council has concluded that developments in Croatia, in particular its undertaking to apply in full the Dayton/Paris Αgreements and its policy with regard to arms exports, justifies a lifting of the restrictive measures taken against that State pursuant to Common Position 96/184/CFSP.

(3) It is understood that, with respect to arms exports to Croatia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the Member States will apply strictly the European Union Code of Conduct for arms exports adopted on 8 June 1998,

HAS ADOPTED THIS COMMON POSITION:

Article 1

Common Position 96/184/CFSP is hereby amended as follows:

1. the word "Croatia" in point 2(i) shall be deleted;

2. point 2(ii), shall be replaced by the following:

"(ii) Subject to the provisions of UN Security Council Resolution No 1021, export licence applications to the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and to Croatia shall be considered on a case-by-case basis.

This provision is adopted on the understanding that the Member States will apply strictly the European Union Code of Conduct for arms exports adopted on 8 June 1998. They will also take into account the objectives of the European Union policy in the region, fundamentally aimed at pacification and stabilisation in the area, including the need for arms control and reduction to the lowest possible level and confidence-building measures."

Article 2

This Common Position shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Article 3

This Common Position shall be published in the Official Journal.

Done at Brussels, 20 November 2000.

For the Council

The President

H. Védrine

(1) OJ L 58, 7.3.1996, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 225, 12.8.1998, p. 1.

(3) OJ L 188, 21.7.1999, p. 3.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital   Trust  VI  and  Merrill   Lynch   Preferred   Funding  VI,  L.P.  (the
"Partnership")  for the  period  ended  June 25, 2004 as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John J.
Fosina,  Controller of Merrill  Lynch & Co.,  Inc.,  the General  Partner of the
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING VI, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ JOHN J. FOSINA
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    John J. Fosina *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: August 4, 2004
_____________________

*  John J. Fosina functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
GWLANY-SchwabOneSourceChoiceVAPEA1ConsentLetter4_10_15 (1)






	
		
	

Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A.






























	ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW | Suite 400 East
Washington, DC  20007-5208
202.965.8100 | fax 202.965.8104
www.CFJBLaw.com
Atlanta
Hartford
Miami
New York
Orlando
St. Petersburg
Tallahassee
Tampa
Washington, DC
West Palm Beach








Exhibit 10(a)






April 10, 2015




Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company of New York
50 Main Street
9th Floor
White Plains, New York  10606


Re:  Variable Annuity-1 Series Account 
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on N-4
File Nos. 333-194044 and 811-08183


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have acted as counsel to Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company of New York, a New York corporation, regarding the federal securities laws applicable to the issuance and sale of the contracts described in the above-referenced registration statement.  We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption “Legal Matters” in the prospectus filed as part of the above-referenced registration statement. In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.


Very truly yours,


/s/ Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A.


Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A.



100761868.1
§ 4041A.11 Requirement of notice. ( a ) *General.* A notice of termination must be filed with PBGC by a multiemployer plan when the plan has terminated as described in section 4041A(a) of ERISA.
( b ) *Who must file.* The plan sponsor or a duly authorized representative acting on behalf of the plan sponsor must sign and file the notice.
( c ) *When to file.* ( 1 ) For a termination pursuant to a plan amendment, the notice must be filed with PBGC within thirty days after the amendment is adopted or effective, whichever is later.
( 2 ) For a termination that results from a mass withdrawal, the notice must be filed with PBGC within thirty days after the last employer withdrew from the plan or thirty days after the first day of the first plan year for which no employer contributions were required under the plan, whichever is earlier.
( d ) *How and where to file.* Filings with PBGC under this subpart must be submitted in accordance with the rules in subpart A of part 4000 of this chapter. See § 4000.4 of this chapter for information on where to file.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1212-0020) [61 FR 34052, July 1, 1996, as amended at 80 FR 55745, Sept. 17, 2015; 84 FR 18722, May 2, 2019]
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                  ------------

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gerald R. Mitchell, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and
                  results of operations of the Company.










                                              /s/ Gerald R. Mitchell
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                                Gerald R. Mitchell
                                    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date: June 14, 2005                       (Principal Financial Officer)