alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 4007.9 Coverage for guaranteed basic benefits. ( a ) The failure to pay the premiums due under this part will not result in a plan's loss of coverage for basic benefits guaranteed under section 4022(a) or 4022A(a) of ERISA.
( b ) The payment of the premiums imposed by this part will not result in coverage for basic benefits guaranteed under section 4022(a) or 4022A(a) of ERISA for plans not covered under title IV of ERISA.
[61 FR 34020, July 1, 1996, as amended at 72 FR 71229, Dec. 17, 2007]
Exhibit 23

                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Lilly Industries,  Inc. of our report dated January 23, 1998, included in the
1997 Annual Report to Shareholders of Lilly Industries, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial  statement  schedule of Lilly Industries,
Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the  responsibility of the Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,  presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We further consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 Nos.  2-59159,  2-76317,  33-52959,  33-52956  pertaining to the Lilly
Employees'  Stock Purchase Plan, the Lilly  Industries,  Inc. Stock Option Plan,
the Lilly  Industries,  Inc.  1991  Director  Stock Option  Plan,  and the Lilly
Industries,  Inc. Employee 401(k) Savings Plan,  respectively,  and 33-52958 and
333-32205  pertaining to the Lilly  Industries,  Inc. 1992 Stock Option plan and
Form S-4 No. 333-41587 pertaining to the 7-3/4% Senior Notes due 2007, Series B)
of our report dated January 23, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements  incorporated  herein by  reference,  and our report  included in the
preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Lilly Industries, Inc.



                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
February 26, 1998
EX-4.28



 Exhibit 4.28 

Power of Attorney 
 Abitcool (China)
Broadband Inc. (the “Company”) holds 100% voting rights of aBitcool Small Micro Network Technology (BJ) Co., Ltd. (the “Target Company”) (the “Voting Rights of the Target Company”). 

With respect to the Voting Rights of the Target Company, the Company hereby irrevocably authorizes aBitCool Broadband Inc. (a limited liability company duly
incorporated and existing under the laws of the British Virgin Islands, with its registered address at Palm Grove House, P.O. Box 438, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) to exercise the following rights during the term of
this Power of Attorney: 
 BVI is hereby authorized to exercise on behalf of the Company as its sole and exclusive agent the rights in respect of the Voting
Rights of the Target Company, including without limitation: 1) to attend shareholders’ meetings of the Target Company; 2) to exercise all rights of the Company as a shareholder of the Target Company according to laws and the articles of
association of the Target Company; and 3) to designate and appoint, as the authorized representative of the Company, the legal representative (chairperson), director, supervisor, general manager and any other senior management of the Target Company.

 Any and all actions associated with the Voting Rights of the Target Company made by BVI will be deemed as the action of the Company, and any and all
documents relating to the Voting Rights of the Target Company executed by BVI shall be deemed to be executed and acknowledged by the Company. 
 BVI may
delegate this Power of Attorney by assigning its rights relating to the conduct of the aforesaid matters to any other person or entity at its own discretion without prior notice to or consent from the Company. 

Throughout the term of this Power of Attorney, this Power of Attorney shall be irrevocable and continuously valid from the date of execution of this Power of
Attorney. 
 During the term of this Power of Attorney, the Company hereby waives all of the rights that have been authorized to BVI and will not exercise
any such right by itself. 
 /s/ Abitcool (China) Broadband Inc. 

July 1, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 84 (Monday, May 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10777]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the Board of Visitors of Marine Corps University

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board of Visitors of the Marine Corps University (BOV MCU) 
will meet to review, develop and provide recommendations on all aspects 
of the academic and administrative policies of the University; examine 
all aspects of professional military education operations; and provide 
such oversight and advice as is necessary to facilitate high 
educational standards and cost effective operation. Board will be 
reviewing the fiscal plan for next year, the University's College of 
Continuing Education, Board presiding officer restrictions contained in 
the regional accrediting guidelines, and the status of the review and 
update of the Board By-laws. All sessions of the meeting will be open 
to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday and Wednesday, June 6-7, 
from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Marine Corps University 
Research Center, 2040 Broadway Street, Room 164, Quantico, Virginia 
22134.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Garry Smith, Executive Secretary, 
Marine Corps University Board of Visitors, 2076 South Street, Quantico, 
Virginia 22134, (703) 784-4037.

    Dated: April 20, 2000.
J.L. Roth,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-10777 Filed 4-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1430 CA 11-00731 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, GREEN, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF PMA MANAGEMENT CORP., PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

ROBERT WHITE AND HINMAN, HOWARD & KATTELL, LLP, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

HINMAN, HOWARD & KATTELL, LLP, BINGHAMTON (PAUL T. SHEPPARD OF COUNSEL), RESPONDENT-APPELLANT PRO SE, AND FOR ROBERT WHITE, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, SYRACUSE (J.P. WRIGHT OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Donald A. Greenwood, J.), entered January 7, 2011. The order denied the motion of respondents for leave to answer the petition, to resettle and for reargument.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed ( see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City , 167 AD2d 983, 984) and insofar as it denied that part of the motion seeking to resettle the order entered January 19, 2010 is dismissed ( see Gifaldi v Dumont Co. , 172 AD2d 1025, 1026) and the order is affirmed without costs.

Entered: December 30, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
From: Armen Kamian

To: LEVIN, NANCY Subject: FW: PM 2.5 Emissions Inventory

Date: Thursday, August 08, 2013 2:50:31 PM

Attachments: image004.png 20120302_implement_guidance_24-hr_pm2.5_naaqs.pdf



### Hi Nancy, Here is the answer regarding the inventory year. I’m fairly new at all this, and needed to consult – I’ll get the rest of the modeling answers tomorrow.

Armen

From: Najita, Theresa@ARB [mailto:tnajita@arb.ca.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 2:44 PM To: Armen Kamian Cc: Velasco, Patricia@ARB; Magliano, Karen@ARB; Vanderspek, Sylvia@ARB Subject: RE: PM 2.5 Emissions Inventory

Armen,

Implementation Guidance from EPA required that we use one of the three years that were used for the nonattainment designation. I have attached a copy of this Guidance (which came out in 2012); the relevant section is on page 7.

We used 2005 for other reasons as well; this was the most up-to-date and comprehensive inventory for the area and it did NOT include any possibility of the 2008 Northern California Wildfires (even though we eventually went with a winter only inventory).

Hope this helps,

Theresa

From: Armen Kamian [ mailto:akamian@bcaqmd.org ] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 1:04 PM To: Najita, Theresa@ARB Subject: FW: PM 2.5 Emissions Inventory



### Hi Teresa, Can you help me with the answer to question #3 below regarding our PM 2.5 emissions inventory? I don’t recall the “why”. Thanks,

Armen Kamian Associate Air Quality Planner Butte County Air Quality Management District 629 Entler Avenue, Suite 15 Chico, CA 95928 530-332-9400, x108 www.bcaqmd.orgFrom: LEVIN, NANCY [ mailto:Levin.Nancy@epa.gov ] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 10:39 AM To: Armen Kamian Subject: PM 2.5 Emissions Inventory



### Hi Armen, Thanks for taking my call this morning. I am reviewing the Chico/Butte County 2012 PM 2.5 emissions inventory for John Ungvarsky, and am just looking for a few pieces of information to complete my review. I’ve listed them below. Feel free to call if you have questions. My phone is 415-972-3848.

1. I have a copy of the August 17, 2012 public notice for the September 27, 2012 public hearing, but I also need a proof of publication or other evidence of publication for the notice (where and when published);

2. I wanted to confirm that EMFAC11 and OFFROAD11 models were used for the mobile source inventories, and if not, what models were used;

3. Could you tell me why the base year of 2005 was used, rather than a more recent year?

4. Would you be able to provide the name or type of methodology used to estimate general area sources, such as solvent evaporation?

5. Were there any public comments on this inventory?

Thanks! Regards,
Nancy

______________________________________________

Nancy Levin Air Rules Office

415.972.3848 levin.nancy@epa.gov US EPA Region 9, 75 Hawthorne St (AIR-4) San Francisco, CA 94105
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3470 — FIRST RESERVE / BLACKSTONE / RAG AMERICAN COAL)

(2004/C 174/14)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 29 June 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

----
(77 South. 1002)

#### BAADER v. STATE.

(6 Div. 250.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 15, 1918.)

Appeal from Cullman County Court; R. I. Burke, Judge.

Tumlin & Ingram and Emil Ahlrichs, all of Cullman, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded in accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court (201 Ala. 76, 77 South. 370). See, also, ante, p. 144, 75 South. 820.
§ 36.515 Compensation. A recipient shall not make or enforce any policy or practice that, on the basis of sex: ( a ) Makes distinctions in rates of pay or other compensation;
( b ) Results in the payment of wages to employees of one sex at a rate less than that paid to employees of the opposite sex for equal work on jobs the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and that are performed under similar working conditions.
countyIDfuelYearIDmonthGroupIDfuelFormulationIDmarketSharemarketShareCV

11272012 1 20011 1 0.5 11272012 1 3910 1 0.5 11272012 2 3910 1 0.5 11272012 2 20011 1 0.5 11272012 3 20011 1 0.5 11272012 3 3911 1 0.5 11272012 4 3911 1 0.5 11272012 4 20011 1 0.5 11272012 5 20011 1 0.5 11272012 5 3911 1 0.5 11272012 6 3912 1 0.5 11272012 6 20011 1 0.5 11272012 7 20011 1 0.5 11272012 7 3912 1 0.5 11272012 8 3912 1 0.5 11272012 8 20011 1 0.5 11272012 9 20011 1 0.5 11272012 9 3912 1 0.5 11272012 10 3911 1 0.5 11272012 10 20011 1 0.5 11272012 11 20011 1 0.5 11272012 11 3911 1 0.5 11272012 12 3910 1 0.5 11272012 12 20011 1 0.5
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 128529 & (18) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 128529 

 COA: 257609 

Saginaw CC: 00-019048-FC 

ERIC LAMARR MACON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 7, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion for stay of proceedings is DENIED. 

d1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 99 (Monday, May 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 32085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12714]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2425-000]


New England Power Pool; Notice of Filing

May 16, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 5, 2000, the New England Power Pool 
(NEPOOL) Participants Committee submitted the Fifty-Third Agreement 
Amending the New England Power Pool Agreement (Fifty-Fourth Agreement) 
which addresses affiliation and representation issues raised by end 
user applications for membership in NEPOOL.
    A July 1, 2000 effective data has been requested.
    The NEPOOL Participants Committee states that copies of these 
materials were sent to the New England state governors and regulatory 
commissions and the NEPOOL Participants.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before May 26, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available and are available for public inspection. This filing may 
also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-12714 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### § 91.5 Pilot in command of aircraft requiring more than one required pilot.

No person may operate an aircraft that is type certificated for more than one required pilot flight crewmember unless the pilot in command meets the requirements of § 61.58 of this chapter.
----

----

I Communications

Commission

----

CATALOGUE COMMUN DES VARIÉTÉS DES ESPÈCES AGRICOLES

Treizième complément à la vingt-deuxième édition intégrale

(2004/C 232 A/01)

LÉGENDE

IV

80.ZEA MAYS L.

----

(1)JO C 91 A, du 16.4.2003. Catalogue modifié en dernier lieu par la douzième édition du supplément (JO C 213 A du 25.8.2004).

----
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

I, Charles S. Conoley, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc,.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [Intentionally Omitted] for the registrant and we have:
5. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
6. [Intentionally Omitted];
7. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
8. disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
9. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
10. all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
11. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2005

/s/ Charles S. Conoley 
President and Chief Executive Officer
NEW YORK COMMON PLEAS

GENERAL TERM.

Filed June 3, 1889.

#### PATRICK SCANLON, Resp’t, v. CHARLES BROPLY and ano., App’lts.

*A. H. Beawy,*for resp’t; *A. Lamont,*for app’lts.

Appeal from second district court, Mubbay, J.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### KINKER, et v ABEREGG

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist, Sandusky Co

No 228.

Decided Oct 13, 1930

Culbert & Culber.t, Fremont and A. L. Ludwig, for Kinker, et.

W. J. Mead, Fremont, for Aberegg.

WILLIAMS, J.

There is no doubt that the transaction involved was a gambling transaction, in connection with which Aberegg furnished $1,000.00 with the expectation that Kinker, to whom he gave the money, “would make it right”. The cognovit note in question was given by Fred Kinker and his father to take up a note previously given for the same amount, and both these notes were based upon the alleged debt arising from the giving of the said $1,000.00 to Kinker by Aberegg.

Under 5965 GC, the note involved in this suit is void and of no effect.

The judgment of the court below is re-

versed and final judgment rendered, for plaintiffs in error.

Lloyd and Richards, JJ, concur.
§ 2590.701-5 Evidence of creditable coverage. ( a ) *In general.* The rules for providing certificates of creditable coverage and demonstrating creditable coverage have been superseded by the prohibition on preexisting condition exclusions. *See* § 2590.715-2704 for rules prohibiting the imposition of a preexisting condition exclusion.
( b ) *Applicability.* The provisions of this section apply beginning December 31, 2014.
[79 FR 10309, Feb. 24, 2014]
----

----

I Communications

Commission

----

Taux de change de l'euro (1)

16 septembre 2004

(2004/C 232/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: taux de change de référence publié par la Banque centrale européenne.

----

III Informations

Commission

----

Appel FP6-2003-SME-1

(«Journal officiel de l'Union européenne» C 307 du 17 décembre 2003)

(2004/C 232/02)

En référence à l'appel FP6-2003-SME-1, publié au Journal officiel le 17 décembre 2003 (1) pour une date de clôture au 21 octobre 2004, les règles de soumission des propositions d'action indirecte sont modifiées de la manière suivante:

Les proposants qui ne peuvent pour des raisons techniques utiliser le système de soumission électronique des propositions (EPSS) peuvent demander, au plus tard le 5 octobre 2004, à la Commission européenne le droit de soumettre leur proposition par courrier, conformément au paragraphe 6 de l'appel. Les demandes motivées doivent être adressées à l'adresse suivante:

----

(1)JO C 307 du 17.12.2003, p. 15.

----
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of The Boyds Collection, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph E. Macharsky, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2)             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Joseph  E. Macharsky |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Joseph E. Macharsky      |   |
| Chief Financial Officer  |   |
| May 14, 2003             |   |

 

1

----