alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than June 8, 2000. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (JoAnne F. Lewellen, Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291: 

1. David C. Reiling, Minneapolis, Minnesota; to acquire voting shares of University Financial Corporation, Saint Paul, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of University National Bank, Saint Paul, Minnesota. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 19, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-13129 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
EXHIBIT 23






                         Consent of Independent Auditors



         We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Post-Effective
Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement (No. 33-16238) on Form S-8 relating to
Long Island  Lighting  Company's  Employee Stock  Purchase Plan,  Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Registration  Statement (No. 2-87427) on Form S-3 relating to
Long Island Lighting Company's  Automatic Dividend  Reinvestment Plan and in the
related Prospectus, Registration Statement (No. 2-88578) on Form S-3 relating to
the  issuance of Common  Stock and in the related  Prospectus  and  Registration
Statement  (No.  33-52963)  on Form S-3  relating to the issuance of General and
Refunding Bonds, Debentures,  Preferred Stock or Common Stock and in the related
Prospectus,  of our report dated February 7, 1996, with respect to the financial
statements and schedule of Long Island Lighting  Company included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.





                                                ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Melville, New York
February 20, 1996
(77 South. 1005)

#### WOODLAWN REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CO. v. SPIRO HARDWARE CO.

(6 Div. 342.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 29, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; C. B. Smith, Judge.

C. D. Ritter, of Birmingham, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Visualant, Incorporated on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley E. Sparks, Chief
Executive Officer, President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge  and  belief:





(1)  the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and





(2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.









/s/
Bradley E. Sparks


Bradley
E. Sparks


Chief
Executive Officer, President and Director







Date:  August
19, 2008
(77 South. 1005)

#### WOODLAWN REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CO. v. EMPIRE IMPROVEMENT CO.

(6 Div. 355.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 27, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; H. A. Sharpe, Judge.

G. W. Yancey, of Birmingham, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7211

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARK LYNN, a/k/a Mark Aaron Lynn,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior 

District Judge. (3:08-cr-00082-REP-1; 3:11-cv-00585-REP)

Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 3, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Lynn, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Gurney 

Wingate Grant, II, Angela Mastandrea-Miller, Assistant United

States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Mark Lynn seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The 

orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Lynn has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IIA 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 43 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating 

to marriage. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 25, 2008 

Mr. WICKER (for himself, Mr. VITTER, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. 

INHOFE, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. THUNE, and Mr. SHELBY) 

introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to marriage. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 by the Congress: 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•SJ 43 IS 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE — 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. This article may be cited as the ‘Mar3 riage Protection Amendment’. 

4 ‘‘SECTION 2. Marriage in the United States shall con5 sist only of the union of a man and a woman. Neither 

6 this Constitution, nor the constitution of any State, shall 

7 be construed to require that marriage or the legal inci8 dents thereof be conferred upon any union other than the 

9 union of a man and a woman.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital   Trust  VI  and  Merrill   Lynch   Preferred   Funding  VI,  L.P.  (the
"Partnership")  for the  period  ended  September 24, 2004 as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John J.
Fosina,  Controller of Merrill  Lynch & Co.,  Inc.,  the General  Partner of the
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING VI, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ JOHN J. FOSINA
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    John J. Fosina *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: November 3, 2004
_______________________

*  John J. Fosina functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital   Trust  VI  and  Merrill   Lynch   Preferred   Funding  VI,  L.P.  (the
"Partnership")  for the  period  ended  September  26,  2003 as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John J.
Fosina,  Controller of Merrill  Lynch & Co.,  Inc.,  the General  Partner of the
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING VI, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ JOHN J. FOSINA
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    John J. Fosina *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: November 6, 2003
_______________________

*  John J. Fosina functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 130698 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr.

HIGHLAND-HOWELL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, Petitioner-Appellant, Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 130698 COA: 262437 MTT: 00-307906 TOWNSHIP OF MARION, Respondent-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On November 15, 2006, the Co urt heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal the January 31, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeal s. On order of the Court, the application is again considered, and it is GRANTED. The p arties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) wh at was the specific benefit conferred on petitioner’s property by the special assessment confirmed in 1996, see Kadzban v
Grandville , 442 Mich 495 (1993); (2) whether that benefit was reduced by the informal change in the improvement pl an or respondent’s May 13, 20 04 resolution; (3) whether respondent’s informal change or respondent’s May 13, 2004 resolution is reviewable by the Michigan Tax Tribunal under MCL 205.731(a); and (4 ) what remedy, if any, petitioner would have if the ch ange in the improvement plan after confirmation of the special assessment roll reduced the value that accrued to pe titioner’s property such that the benefit became unreasonably dispropo rtionate to the amount assessed.

d1220 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 29, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000055373
<NAME> KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      710,637
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      6,591
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          69,239
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        10,159
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  90,045
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 886,671
<COMMON>                                        50,450
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      128,750
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             78,076
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 257,276
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           341,051
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  36,500
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     15,006
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 3,719
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 233,119
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  886,671
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      359,543
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            12,140
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     300,547
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     312,687
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         46,856
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                (464)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  46,392
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        25,646
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,746
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   20,746
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        26,760
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       14,867
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          41,265
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> All common stock owned by parent company; no EPS required.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 2200.101 Failure to obey rules. ( a ) *Sanctions.* When any party has failed to plead or otherwise proceed as provided by these rules or as required by the Commission or the Judge, the party may be declared to be in default either on the initiative of the Commission or the Judge, after having been afforded an opportunity to show cause why the party should not be declared to be in default, or on the motion of a party. Subsequently, the Commission or the Judge, in their discretion, may enter a decision against the defaulting party or strike any pleading or document not filed in accordance with these rules.
( b ) *Motion to set aside sanctions.* For reasons deemed sufficient by the Commission or the Judge and upon motion conforming to § 2200.40 expeditiously made, the Commission or the Judge may set aside a sanction imposed under paragraph (a) of this section. See § 2200.90(c).
( c ) *Discovery sanctions and failure to appear.* This section does not apply to sanctions for failure to comply with orders compelling discovery, which are governed by § 2200.52(f), or to a default for failure to appear, which is governed by § 2200.64(a).
( d ) *Show cause orders.* All show cause orders issued by the Commission or the Judge under paragraph (a) of this section shall be served in a manner prescribed in § 2200.7(o).
|Exhibit 23.2


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-128118, 333-118348, 333-106282, 333-101536,
333-69696, 333-45094, 333-83153, 333-58555, 333-29567, 333-02289, 033-60928, 033-58489,
and 033-11718 each on Form S-8 of our report dated March 16, 2005 (March 16, 2007 as to
the effects of the discontinued operations discussed in Note 16), relating to the
financial statements of 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004
appearing in this Form 10-K of 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2006.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche
LLP


New York, NYMarch 16,
2007
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 4043.24 Termination or partial termination. ( a ) *Reportable event.* A reportable event occurs when the Secretary of the Treasury determines that there has been a termination or partial termination of a plan within the meaning of section 411(d)(3) of the Code.
( b ) *Waiver.* Notice is waived for this event.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC. (REGISTRANT)
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James A. Wylie, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify to
the best of my knowledge and belief pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007,
which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Registrant.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter
63 title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.

Date: May 14, 2007                      /s/ JAMES A. WYLIE, JR.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        James A. Wylie, Jr.
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer)
§ 4233.6 Partition information. An application for partition must include the following information with respect to the proposed partition: ( a ) A detailed description of the proposed partition, including the proposed structure, proposed effective date, and any larger integrated transaction of which the proposed partition is a part (including, but not limited to, an application for suspension of benefits under section 305(e)(9)(G), or a merger under section 4231 of ERISA). With respect to coordinated applications for partition and suspension of benefits, proposed effective dates for both transactions must satisfy the requirements of section 305(e)(9)(D)(v) of ERISA.
( b ) A narrative description of the events that led to the plan sponsor's decision to submit an application for partition (and, if applicable, application for suspension of benefits).
( c ) A narrative description of significant risks and assumptions relating to the proposed partition and the projections provided in support of the application.
( d ) If applicable, a copy of the plan sponsor's application for suspension of benefits (including all attachments and exhibits). If the plan sponsor intends to apply for a suspension of benefits with Treasury, but has not yet submitted an application to Treasury, a draft of the application may be filed, which must be supplemented by filing a copy of the completed application within the timeframe established in § 4233.10(d).
( e ) A detailed description of all measures the plan sponsor has taken (or is taking) to avoid insolvency, and any measures the plan sponsor considered taking but did not take, including the factor(s) the plan sponsor considered in making these determinations. Include all relevant documentation relating to the plan sponsor's determination that it has taken (or is taking) measures to avoid insolvency.
( f ) A detailed description of the estimated benefit amounts the plan sponsor has determined are necessary to be partitioned for the plan to remain solvent, including the following information: ( 1 ) The estimated number of participants and beneficiaries whose benefits (or any portion thereof) would be transferred, including the number of retirees receiving payments (if any), terminated vested participants (if any), and active participants (if any).
( 2 ) Supporting data, calculations, assumptions, and a description of the methodology used to determine the estimated benefit amounts.
( 3 ) If applicable, a description of any classifications or specific group(s) of participants and beneficiaries whose benefits (or any portion thereof) the plan sponsor proposes to transfer, and the plan sponsor's rationale or basis for selecting those classifications or groups.
( g ) A copy of the draft notice of application for partition described in § 4233.11.
[80 FR 35229, June 19, 2015, as amended at 80 FR 79694, Dec. 23, 2015]