Porter, Stacy

From: Heather Sibilla [hsibilla@folsom.ca.us]

Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 2:02 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: FW: Folsom Point

Page 1 of 2

1/23/2007

From: vkytkytovy@comcast.net [mailto:vkytkytovy@comcast.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:57 AM 

To: The Mayor; ericking@folsom.ca.us; corrprincess@folsom.ca.us; Steve Miklos; Jeff Starsky 

Subject: FW: Folsom Point

 

Dear Mr. Morin, Ms. Howell, Mr. King, Mr. Miklos and Mr. Starsky, 

 

Attached is the e-mail that I just sent to you regarding the closing of Folsom Point. While messages 

are making the rounds in our neighborhood encouraging us to voice our displeasure at the closing of 

Folsom Point, my understanding was that the closure was due to the building of the planned bridge. 

 

After reading another e-mail which I received just shortly after the one I sent you, I see my mistake and 

that the closure is due to the retrofit of the dam. 

 

However, my comments remain the same as this is yet, as I said below, another slap in the face for the 

residents of Briggs Ranch. How many ways can The City and the Bureau of Reclaimation choose to 

affect one neighborhood? 

 

My request is that another location for the staging area be chosen. The residents of Briggs Ranch stand 

to loose property value, have increased traffic pouring through, and the noise levels caused by the 

construction of the bridge followed by it's use, will be unpleasant to deal with to say the least. To add to 

that the closure of Folsom Point, is just not right. Not to mention the mess, traffic issues and noise due 

to the construction of the retrofit. 

 

Thank you for listening, Vicky 

 

-------------- Forwarded Message: -------------- 

From: vkytkytovy@comcast.net (Vicky Cackler) 

To: themayor@folsom.ca.us, ericking@folsom.ca.us, corrprincess@folsom.caus, 

smiklos@folsom.ca.us, jstarsky@folsom.ca.us 

Subject: Folsom Point 

Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:34:11 +0000 

Dear Mr. Morin, Ms. Howell, Mr. King, Mr. Miklos and Mr. Starsky, 

 

My husband and I are Briggs Ranch residents and understand that you plan to close Folsom 

Point to use as a staging area for the building of the new bridge. 

 

I want to express my concern for several reasons. For the residents of Briggs Ranch (there are 

over 600 homes in this neighborhood), who have already been hit hard by the closing of the dam 

road in the first place, and will be dramatically effected by the increase in traffic once the new 

Comment #157
bridge opens due to building up of the Empire Ranch and El Dorado Hills areas in the years 

since the dam was closed, this is just another slap in the face. 

 

The building of the bridge stands to cause huge noise levels, increased traffic pouring through 

and behind our neighborhood, and thus, a decrease in our property values. Closing Folsom 

Point, which is one of the features that draws people to live in Briggs Ranch, will further cause a 

decline to the value of our neighborhood specifically. 

 

My second area of concern is for the residents of Folsom in general. Folsom Point serves as an 

entrance for many in the area of recreation. People bike, walk and boat from this point, and 

while yes, there are other areas to begin your day of fun, this is a convenient place for so many 

and again a reason to have chosen to live in the immediate area. 

 

I think I definitely speak for the residents of Briggs Ranch when I say - we have had enough 

While building a bridge is necessary due to the increased population - we are already being hurt 

by it's determined placement and the flow of traffic to enter and exit when there were other 

options. It is time to spread some of the pain and find another location to work from. 

 

I have also sent this same message to Mr. Shawn Oliver at the Bureau of Reclamation and Becky 

Victorine at the US Army Corps of Engineers.

 

Sincerely, 

 

 

Vicky Cackler 

108 Strouse Ct. 

Folsom, CA 95630 

Page 2 of 2

1/23/2007

Comment #157
Porter, Stacy

From: chantell harp [gcharp@pacbell.net]

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 7:38 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Page 1 of 1

1/25/2007

Save Folsom!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Mike Finnegan [MFINNEGAN@mp.usbr.gov]

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:37 PM

To: Shawn Oliver

Subject: Fwd: Closure of Folsom.

>>> <Ericksenbob@aol.com> 01/25 4:35 PM >>>

I heard a rumor that there is a possibility that Folsom Point on Folsom Lake might be 

closed temporarily so it can be used as a staging area for construction of the new bridge 

at Folsom Dam. I am a Civil Engineer and I specialize in heavy construction so I 

understand the need for a laydown yard and staging area but I must protest the use of this

vital recreation area for construction use. This is a heavily used lake and the facilities

for lake access are already impacted and overused. The boat ramp and parking lot at 

Folsom Point are always filled to capacity especially on weekends. This would be a 

tremendous impact on the community and should be avoided at all costs. 

The location itself does not lend itself to use as a laydown and staging area for the 

bridge as there is no overland access to the bridge site without entering the public right

of way. The size and type of equipment and material neeeded for constructing this bridge 

would not be allowed to travel on the public roads. I would think the property bounded by 

the Jail, Natoma Rd. and the exiting Dam Rd. would be better suited for this purpose. 

As a resident of Folsom and frequent Lake user I urge you consider other alternatives to 

closing Folsom Point.

Thank you for your time.
Porter, Stacy

From: Robert Flores/Divers Cove [diverscove@diverscove.net]

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:29 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Opposed to Folsom Point Closure 

Page 1 of 2

1/26/2007

To Bureau of Reclamation, 

I am submitting this letter to you regarding the irresponsible actions you and your 

administration are taking in your plans on closing Folsom Point (Dike 8) 

It is to be noted that over 140000 persons use this location to view and use Folsom Lake. Thus 

far Folsom has lost the use of the access the lower point parking lot near Negro Bar (After the 

construction of the new bridge), Then in 2001 you decided to close Vista Point due to security 

reasons (This decision did little to improve security by any means, I am a security specialist 

and Army Veteran) And now finally you want to close Folsom Point. 

I own a scuba shop in Folsom and made the decision to build here due to easy access to the 

lake. Over the years I have adapted to the closures of the other two sites and found myself 

training students off of Folsom Point. While the restrictions have become difficult, they were 

manageable. It has taken over 10 years of my life to build and develop a successful business 

here in Folsom. Your lack of conducting a financial impact study or minimum impact study is 

atrocious to say the least.

I have having difficulty in understanding why the Bureau of Reclamation cannot use the 

parking lot at Vista Point (currently closed site) for a staging area for its equipment. Why is it 

that you cannot use an area that has security guards, with restricted vehicle access already in 

place. If equipment needs to be moved via water that a simple boat ramp could not be graded 

in place. I have surveyed the area at Vista Point both on land and underwater and It would 

seem to me that a boat ramp could easily be built there at minimum cost without impacting the 

general public. This option would not effect the general public at all, and with security being 

present and limited access all of your equipment would be in a much more secure location. 

The parking lot at Vista Point is large enough to secure any equipment you have for the entire 

project. I realize that this may also cause you some minor logistics issues as equipment may 

have to be moved to the work area. But the needs and desires of the many out weight the 

needs and the desires of the few. 

As far as impacting the boating general population, I have seen lines as far back as 20-30 

boats waiting to use Folsom Point during the summer. Now you expect these same people to 

go to Browns Ravine, Beales Point or Granite Bay to launch their boats. With their compacity 

already over 100% use. One only has to contact the Folsom Parks and Recreations Officers 

and ask them how many times, altercations have occurred, over boat ramps being used 

beyond their limits. Short tempters due to long waits in line, just to gain access to launch at 

Granite Bay or Browns Ravine are normal already. The closure of Folsom Point and redirection 

of these boaters to above mentioned launch ramps, will no doubt have considerable 

repercussions on the entire lake area. 

If the Bureau of Reclamation has a need to conduct repairs or construction, I am confident that 
you have known of these repair for quite some time, You have had plenty of time to prepare for 

this repair, and part of it should have included an impact study and preparations should have 

been made long in advance with notification being given to local businesses and residence to 

address this issue. Poor planning results in poor performance. 

The actions over the last few years regarding the access to the water at: Lake Natoma, Vista 

Point and now Folsom Point. Seem to show little if no regard to impact on the public use of 

these facilities. I would be willing to bet that if a endangered field mouse or other species had 

habitat in the area you would halt this action. But no thought has been given to the HUMANS 

that paid for access to use of this facility.

Dropping the decision on our laps, with little response time, and little ability to react, only 

demonstrates that the Bureau of Reclamation was not interested in hearing about any of the 

repercussions of its decision. It further demonstrates that a totalitarian attitude of the Bureau of 

Reclamation exists and needs to be addressed. 

I am opposed to closure of any part Folsom Point (Dike 8) for any amount of time. You have 

made decisions without looking at the financial or environmental impact it will have on 

Folsom. The general population and all businesses and will be impacted by this poor decision, 

including mine. Our government is supposed to work for us not against us. This aligns on a 

12000.00 dollar Air Force hammer purchase, as far as government overlooking spending and 

decision making abilities.

Robert Flores

Divers Cove 

Folsom CA 95630

916-984-6185 

I am interested in a responsible response, as I have over 4000 clients on my email list that are 

eagerly awaiting your response. I can only pray that I do not receive an automated reply. 

CC: State Govt

 White House

 Local Media

Page 2 of 2

1/26/2007
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Shawn Oliver [soliver@mp.usbr.gov]

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 5:39 PM

To: Porter, Stacy

Subject: Comment:

From: nkwooten@juno.com [mailto:nkwooten@juno.com]

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:51 PM

To: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov.gov; soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Cc: diverscove@sbcglobal.net

Subject: 

To Whom It May Concern:

Please do not close Folsom Point to scuba divers! We have already lost several important 

local spots. Folsom Point is a convenient place to practice skills when I cannot get to 

Monterey. I have spent many hours there honing my skills and having fun, and I hope to 

continue to do so in the future. I think it's an especially great place to have scuba 

classes because you don't have to deal with surf, salt, and sand; diving there reduces 

stress for new divers or those of us practicing skills.

Thank you for reading my opinion.

Sincerely,

Naomi Wooten

3625 Black Eagle Dr., Antelope, CA 95843 (916)729-4028

Shawn E. Oliver

Natural Resource Specialist

Bureau of Reclamation

Central California Area Office (Folsom)

Email soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Office (916) 989-7256

Fax (916) 989-7208
Porter, Stacy

From: Kris Olding [oldingfamily1@comcast.net]

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:07 PM

To: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: DO NOT CLOSE FOLSOM POINT!

Page 1 of 1

1/26/2007

It has been bad enough that the DAM Road has been closed but to ruin the wonderful recreation area of 

FOLSOM POINT by closing it for 7 years is ridiculous. Do the construction at Beale's point or at the 

DAM road or on the prison grounds but don't wreck our lives by closing the Folsom Point. 

DO NOT CLOSE FOLSOM 

POINT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Sincerely, 

Kristine Olding

Nigel Olding

Sheldon Olding

Philip Olding

Kirk Olding

Thomas Olding

Folsom Residents since 1988 DO NOT CLOSE FOLSOM POINT!

 

 
Porter, Stacy

From: Jerry Stieve [dstieve@sbcglobal.net]

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:27 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil

Subject: Folsom Point 

Page 1 of 1

1/26/2007

Shawn, Becky 

 I feel that closing Folsom Point is not in the best interest of the area business and boat dealers, Lake 

recreation would be cut by at least 35 % , Granite Bay and Browns Ravine are a zoo with Folsom Point 

open, closed it would be impossible to access the lake, the monetary loss to state parks is also added into 

this situation including my yearly pass. 

 I'm sure that other areas could be used for staging, A 5-6 acre site at the north and south ends of the 

dam could be used that are now growing weeds and the area behind Morman island dam, I'm sure the 

city of Folsom would assist as well. 

 

Thank You 

Daryl Stieve 

908 Persifer st 

Folsom CA 95630 
Porter, Stacy

From: EBSevents@aol.com

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:19 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: DO NOT CLOSE: Folsom Point Closure

Page 1 of 1

1/26/2007

To who it may concern: 

 

I am writing this to you in hopes that you will reconsider the closure of the Folsom Point Boat Launch area. 

Folsom has already been hit hard with the closure of the Damn Road. Folsom is a beautiful community with a 

great lake that supports, Granite Bay, El Dorado Hills and Folsom, having three entrances into the lake for boat 

launching. You have already crippled the city with the damn closure; now you want to attach our Lake. You can 

only load your boats in three different locations, which accommodates many local cities, with a lot of boaters. 

This is what drew people to buy in this area. The "Lake" is the "draw" to Folsom and the surrounding cities. 

Why would you do this to us? Closing this point will effect all of our summer actives. Please, Please reconsider 

this for our community. We have a boat, we love the lake, this is where our we and our neightbors spend time 

in the spring, summer and early fall. Do not take this away from us!!!! 

Thank you in advance, 

Dan & Sheri Stafford, and family 
Tisthammer, Troy

From: robert halldorson [archamedez@yahoo.com]

Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 3:35 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: folsom point

Page 1 of 1

1/29/2007

Losing folsom point for seven years, this is a bad idea all around.There has got to be another way.I say 

you don't let them proceed until they find it! 

 
Porter, Stacy

From: Hall, Garth [ghall@ebmud.com]

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:34 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Cc: Donovan, Karen

Subject: Comments on Folsom Dam EIS/EIR

Attachments: Comments Folsom Dam EIS-EIR Final 1-24-07.doc

Page 1 of 1

1/26/2007

Hi Shawn ...

Thanks very much for calling to offer your help in answering questions. The attached is an electronic version of 

comments submitted to you today via FedEx. I thought it may help in your compilation to have an electronic 

version.

Please use me as your primary contact at EBMUD in this regard.

Best regards,

Garth C. Hall

East Bay Municipal Utility District

375 Eleventh Street, MS 407

Oakland, CA 94607-4240

tel: 510.287.2061

fax: 510.287.1295

 
January 24, 2007 

Mr. Shawn Oliver 

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation 

7794 Folsom Dam Road 

Folsom, CA 95630 

Ms. Rebecca Victorine 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 

1325 J Street 

Sacramento, CA 95814-2922 

RE: Folsom Dam Safety and Flood Damage Reduction EIS/EIR 

Dear Mr. Oliver and Ms. Victorine: 

The East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) appreciates the opportunity to 

comment on the Draft EIS/EIR prepared on the Folsom Dam Safety and Flood Damage 

Reduction project. EBMUD is responsible for supplying water to parts of Alameda and 

Contra Costa counties on the eastern side of San Francisco Bay in northern California. 

EBMUD's water system serves approximately 1.3 million people in a 325-square-mile 

area. In 2006, the District executed a long-term renewal contract with the U.S. Bureau 

of Reclamation (Reclamation) for a supplemental dry-year supply from the Central 

Valley Project (CVP). As a CVP contractor, the operations of Folsom Dam and its 

appurtenant facilities are of concern to EBMUD. It is in this context that we offer the 

following comments on the Draft EIS/EIR. 

1. The document does not adequately support the use of the 400,000/670,000 acre 

foot variable reservation of flood control space (operating rule) as a key assumption 

in the No Action Alternative.

The Interim Flood Operations Agreement (Agreement) between the Sacramento Area 

Flood Control Agency (SAFCA) and Reclamation includes an interim 400,000/670,000 

acre foot operating rule. The Agreement and operating rule were intended only to 

provide a temporary, interim flood damage reduction benefit until the Corps’ outlet 

modification project was completed. At this time there is no mechanism in place to 

compel continuation of the interim operating rule beyond 2018. NEPA requires that a no 

action alternative account for a predicted change in future conditions. Given that the 

agreement is currently scheduled to expire shortly after or during the construction of the 

improvements described in the DEIS/EIR, the no action alternative should use the pre1993 400,000 acre foot rule as the default. 
Shawn Oliver Rebecca Victorine 

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 

January 24, 2007 

Page 2 

2. The Draft EIS/EIR’s discussion of impacts and alternatives is insufficient because 

the document fails to address the implementation of new operations. 

The document states that any consideration of the impacts of changed operations cannot 

be determined and defers this discussion and development of operational alternatives to a 

point after this project has commenced. At that later point, however, operational 

alternatives could be constrained or favored by the physical solution that is selected and 

constructed. In addition, the range of alternatives examined in the Draft EIS/EIR does 

not encompass alternatives involving downstream levees. Where the Water Resources 

Development Act of 1996 contemplates development and implementation of a flood 

damage reduction plan for the American River, no such plan is accounted for in the Draft 

EIS/EIR. As a result, the flood control alternatives and their impacts are too narrowly 

described in the Draft EIS/EIR to meet the requirements of NEPA. The studies should be 

completed and described in a more comprehensive set of alternatives before a revised 

draft EIS/EIR is issued and operational impacts should be considered to the extent 

possible. 

3. The Draft EIS/EIR should address the range of financial impacts on CVP water 

contractors. 

Because the Draft EIS/EIR has deferred any discussion or evaluation of operational rules, 

there are no estimates of the economic/financial impact to CVP water contractors, due to 

likely changes to the operation of Folsom reservoir resulting from the Proposed Project 

and other alternatives. In turn, no remedies have been identified to compensate CVP 

water contractors for likely operational changes that could result in reduced water supply. 

The document, in other words, has failed to consider the indirect and cumulative impacts 

that are likely to result from the project. 

EBMUD requests that the Corps and Bureau of Reclamation consider these issues in 

finalizing the Draft EIS/EIR. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this 

document and look forward to future opportunities to participate in the changes 

contemplated for Folsom Dam. 

Sincerely, 

Alexander R. Coate 

Manager of Water Supply Improvements 

ARC:GCH:acr 

cc: Rob Alcott, EBMUD 

 Karen Donovan, EBMUD 
Porter, Stacy

From: Kelly James [kjames@apple.com]

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:08 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Point

Page 1 of 1

1/26/2007

Hello, 

I saw the article on Folsom Point on the News 10 website regarding the closing of Folsom Point for 

seven years. I live in Folsom and use the lake on a regular basis. Closing a major ramp and parking lot 

is going to cause major problems during the summer, not only for Folsom residents but for all who use 

Folsom's recreational facilities. 

I urge you t o find another solution that will not adversely impact the community. 

Thanks 

Kelly James 

kjames@apple.com

Office 916-399-5216 

Mobile 916-628-3905 
Porter, Stacy

From: Gary Devers [gdtwo@sbcglobal.net]

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:19 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; 'dotis@water.ca.gov'

Subject: Folsom Point Closure

Page 1 of 1

1/26/2007

Dear Sir: 

 

If you intend on closing Folsom Point I will sell my boat and for the first time in twenty years not buy a 

season pass. This launch is used by myself and most of my friends in the area. Please revise your staging 

area somewhere else, my family loves the lake and will miss it in the event you use the parking lot for a 

staging area. 

 

Gary Devers 
Porter, Stacy

From: Margarita Sanchez [MSANCHEZ@dbw.ca.gov]

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:07 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Point Recreation Area

Importance: High

Attachments: 01 23 07 Shawn Oliver.doc

Network Blitz Page 1 of 1

1/26/2007

Attached please find letter from Director Raynor Tsuneyoshi to Shawn Oliver. Original 

was mailed January 22, 2007.

 

Thank you.

 

 

Margarita Sanchez

Administrative Assistant

Calif. Dept. of Boating and Waterways

2000 Evergreen Street, Suite 100

Sacramento, Calif.   95815

Tel:  916.263.4330

Fax: 916.263.0648

Porter, Stacy

From: Karin Miller [KarinM@bentleymortgage.net]

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:00 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Closure of Folsom Point

Attachments: image001.wmz; oledata.mso

Page 1 of 1

1/26/2007

I would like to voice my opinion not to close Folsom Point. My husband and I moved here from our 

childhood homes in the Bay Area specifically to be close to the lake and enjoy the recreation of 

the Folsom area and quaint neighborhood. We live in Briggs Ranch and bought a boat two years 

ago, we take my 10-yr. old son and his friends on the boat each summer and feel privileged to be 

so close to the lake.

The reason people move to Folsom is for all of the wonderful things (especially the lake). We 

hope you make decisions that are for the benefit of the people that live their today! Thank you.

Karin Miller

Loan Processor & Real Estate Transaction Coordinator

Bentley Mortgage/Gold Lake Real Estate

Tel. 916.983.3616

Fax 916.983.6328

Make it a great day!

 
Porter, Stacy

From: J [safari111@sbcglobal.net]

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:59 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Yes on folsom Pt closure

Page 1 of 1

1/26/2007

Mr. Oliver, sacrifice is necessary, even though we will be affected. 

Those same people that are against the closure would be the 1st to put the blame on the 

gov. if there was a flood.

 

Do the right thing!

 

Joel & Cathy Miller
Porter, Stacy

From: Leslie Nagel [lwnagel@sbcglobal.net]

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:01 AM

To: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Point

Page 1 of 1

1/26/2007

Mr. Finnegan:

I would like to put my two cents in about the possibility of closing Folsom Point for work on the dam at Folsom 

Lake. My family and I are against the closing of Folsom Point and would prefer that an alternate site be found.

Sincerely,

Leslie Nagel

500 Williams Street

Folsom, CA 95630 
Porter, Stacy

From: Reinbolt,Derek K [DREINBOL@travelers.com]

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:30 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil

Cc: Debbie Reinbolt; Derek Debbie Reinbolt

Subject: Folsom Dam Spillway and Folsom Point staging area

Folsom Dam Spillway and Folsom Point staging area Page 1 of 2

1/26/2007

Mr. Shawn Oliver, Bureau of Reclamation and Ms. Becky Victorine, US Army Corp of Engineers 

Hello, My wife Debbie, our two school age children and myself have lived in Folsom since August of 1993. One 

of the main reasons we moved to Folsom was the wonderful lake (Folsom Lake), located in the town. This lake 

provides much needed recreation, boating, picnicking, etc.... for area residents during the warm months of the 

year. We frequent the lake often during the summer and have enjoyed many days boating there. We have 

introduced many families and children to boating, water skiing, tubing and other water sports over the years. 

As you may or may not be aware, there is VERY limited access to the lake and there are principally only three 

boat ramps. Granite Bay, Browns Ravine and Folsom Point are the launching points on the lake for power boats 

and each includes limited parking for lake guests and car/trailer parking. On most weekends and holidays, these 

three ramps are busy most of the day and parking lots filled by late morning, at which point no more boats are 

permitted on the lake. Browns' Ravine has the most limited facilities for launching boats and parking vehicles. If 

Folsom Point was to be closed, this would leave two ramp/parking facilities, one of which is the least desirable of 

the three.

The Folsom community was injured after the events of 9/11 when the Bureau of Reclamation took advantage of 

this opportunity to close the Dam road. Many businesses have closed, were forced to relocate to stay in business 

or have been strapped financially due to the traffic created as a result of this closure. The community has 

endured the closure of a main artery to and from Folsom and is hopeful that the bridge connecting Granite Bay 

with Folsom will be built soon. Closing Folsom Point for SEVEN years will deal the community another blow and 

likely cause property values to fall, businesses to close, increase traffic and hurt the style of living that many of us 

moved to Folsom to enjoy. Some might say "it is only seven years". In seven years my oldest daughter will be a 

junior in college and my youngest will be a senior in high school. The Folsom community is primarily families and 

I would fully expect that most feel the same way about the possible closure.

The best location for construction and staging is right next to where the spillway is scheduled to be built. This 

area has been closed to the public since 9/11 and would be ideal, as it is not currently used and the materials 

would be at the closest point for ultimate construction placement. There is amble truck access to this area as 

existing roads could be used and the area is already secured from the public. Security and safety would be better 

than anywhere else as a result.

We understand that another spillway may be needed for Folsom Lake. The people of Folsom are not against 

building the spillway, only the negative impact on this great community as a result of closing one of the few 

access points to Folsom Lake in Folsom that is simply not necessary. Please reconsider the location for staging 

the spillway construction and keep Folsom Point open to the public so the community can enjoy this wonderful 

Lake.

Sincerely, 

Derek & Deborah Reinbolt 

347 Flower Drive 

Folsom, CA 95630 

============================================================================== 
This communication, together with any attachments hereto or links contained herein, 

============================================================================== 

The St. Paul Travelers e-mail system made this annotation on 01/25/07, 13:30:06. 

Folsom Dam Spillway and Folsom Point staging area Page 2 of 2

1/26/2007
Porter, Stacy

From: Mefford,Stacey [SMEFFORD@travelers.com]

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:56 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil

Subject: Folsom Dam Spillway and Folsom Point staging area

Folsom Dam Spillway and Folsom Point staging area Page 1 of 1

1/26/2007

Mr. Shawn Oliver and Ms. Becky Victorine,

As a user of the Granite Bay launching point to Folsom Lake I’m very concerned over the news I heard about the 

closure of Folsom Point for seven years!! It is already very crowed at the launch areas on the weekends and 

closing another point will make it even worse. 

We have already had to endure the closure of access to Folsom with the closure of the Dam road, which hurt 

Folsom deeply. Aren’t there some alternatives for the construction and staging like right next to the spillway 

where a road was already closed to the public? 

I understand that the spillway is needed but can’t it be done without more inconvenience to the residents and 

uses of the lake? Please reconsider the location for staging and the spillway construction and keep Folsom Point 

open to the public so we can enjoy the lake. 

Sincerely,

Stacey Mefford

8468 Milky Way

Orangevale, CA 95662

============================================================================== 

This communication, together with any attachments hereto or links contained herein, 

============================================================================== 

The St. Paul Travelers e-mail system made this annotation on 01/25/07, 13:56:21. 
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Mike Finnegan [MFINNEGAN@mp.usbr.gov]

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 6:01 PM

To: Shawn Oliver

Subject: Fwd: Proposed Closure of Folsom Point State Park

>>> Cheryl Kurimay <cherand2@yahoo.com> 01/25 12:55 PM >>>

Dear Mr. Finnegan,

 and To all of you who can make a difference:

 

 As a resident of Folsom, I am asking that you do everything in your power to keep Folsom

Point State Park open.....

 

 It is such a Blessing to have this beautiful park in our midst. What a loss it would be

if it was taken it away.....

 

 This is a family community. We bring our children and grandchildren to the area to 

walk, picnic, fish and enjoy nature....At the least it is such a peaceful place to get 

away from busy schedules and just reflect on what is important......and this issue is 

important!!

 

 Also, this is a popular boating area and the closure would definitely impact the 

businesses in the area, especially in the summer.. Business owners have expressed great 

concern. Folsom has already suffered a lot of business closures due to the impact of 

closing the DAM Road.

 

 We ask you please to help us in this endeavor,

 

 Respectfully,

 Cheryl & Andy Kurimay

 Cheryl Kurimay

 Southern Living at HOME

 Independent Consultant

 916-203-8228

 cherand2@yahoo.com

 www.southernlivingathome.com/cherylshomedesigns 

 

---------------------------------

No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
Porter, Stacy

From: Heather Sibilla [hsibilla@folsom.ca.us]

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 8:50 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: FW: Folsom Point Closure

Page 1 of 2

1/26/2007

From: cherepresley@aol.com [mailto:cherepresley@aol.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 8:11 PM 

To: The Mayor; rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil 

Cc: bpresleyjbc@aol.com; mschlegel2@comcast.net 

Subject: Folsom Point Closure

 

January 24, 2007 

 

To all of our honorable representatives: 

 

Please be advised that we, citizens of Folsom, CA, have been put on notice that a proposed closure of 

our park is scheduled for the fall of 2007. This proposal comes from the Bureau of Reclamation and the 

US Army Corps of Engineers. It is our understanding that our beautiful park and recreation area will be 

used as a construction staging area for different work projects on the dam and Mormon Island Spillway 

by the Bureau and Army Corps of Engineers. 

 

It is our belief that this closure will have deep and dramatic effects on families, business, tourism and 

the environment. The consequences are far reaching. This is a family community. We bring our children 

to the lake to walk bike swim, picnic, fish, boat and just enjoy nature. This scenario is repeated over and 

over again. Folsom Point is one of the reasons people buy homes in this area. This park is one of the 

jewels of Folsom. Bird Watchers frequent the park. I might point out that even though the Bald Eagle is 

no longer on the endangered species list, it is still protected by the "Bald and Gold Eagle Protection 

Act". It is my understanding that one of the afforded protections is not to disturb the nesting area or 

flight pattern area. This needs more investigation. We have not been given adequate time to investigate 

the impact this proposal will have on our environment. We have other migratory birds that now nest 

there as well. This is a pathway for many other animals as well. Rattlesnakes also reside at Folsom 

Point. 

 

The businesses in Folsom will definitely realize a financial impact. Our business owners look forward to 

the summer months when tourists and other lake traffic provide much needed revenue. Our businesses 

suffered with the closure of the Dam Road and now this may be the proverbial "straw" for financial loss. 

Business owners have expressed a great concern. 

 

We do not oppose positive improvements on the dam. We request a staging area that will not hurt so 

many families, businesses, wildlife and real estate values. In all truth, we have not been given adequate 

time in which to address these issues. We need counsel as to our rights and the right of the wildlife who 

cannot speak for themselves. 

 

We ask all of you, as our voice and representatives, to please aid us in this endeavor. 

 
Respectfully, 

 

Chere' Presley 

Concerned Citizen and Resident of Folsom, California 

Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to 

millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more. 

Page 2 of 2

1/26/2007
Porter, Stacy

From: Heather Sibilla [hsibilla@folsom.ca.us]

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 8:47 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: FW: USBR closure of Folsom Lake facilities for 7 years

Page 1 of 1

1/26/2007

From: Dan Otis [mailto:danford2@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 10:49 PM 

To: The Mayor 

Subject: USBR closure of Folsom Lake facilities for 7 years

 

Mayor Morin: 

I want to urge you to take action to weigh in on the potential USBR closure of the major recreation and 

boating facilities at Folsom Lake at Folsom Point and other locations. This could eliminate the major 

recreation and boating access for up to 7 years! My 13 year old son would be an adult by the time the 

facilities reopened for our family's use. 

USBR needs to revise its draft EIR to include the use of other areas for spillway construction staging--

other areas besides those already in use by hundreds of thousands every year. I am sure that there are 

sites that could be developed at slightly more cost than already developed areas such as boat launch 

facilities, but those minor costs are small in such a huge project as that being done on Folsom Lake. We 

all agree that the work needs done, but USBR needs to find alternatives that will allow uninterrupted use 

of the Lake's boating facilities at the busiest State Park in the area. That is a very high value, especially 

for Folsom residents. 

 

Please let USBR know that you want an alternative that does not use the valuable boating facilities as 

the cheapest location for construction staging. Comments are due by this Friday, and can be emailed to 

USBR at: soliver@mp.usbr.gov and mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov, 916-988-1707. 

 

Thanks for helping us protect the use of Folsom State Park recreation and boating facilities for the 

hundreds of thousands of California taxpayers using the facilities, and the residents and businesses of 

Folsom. 

 

Dan Otis 

420 Rockport Circle 

Folsom, CA 95630 

916-651-9683 
Porter, Stacy

From: Heather Sibilla [hsibilla@folsom.ca.us]

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 8:47 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: FW: Proposed closure Folsom Point State Park

Page 1 of 1

1/26/2007

From: sean mclaughlin [mailto:seanandangie@comcast.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 11:06 PM 

To: The Mayor 

Subject: Proposed closure Folsom Point Stata Park

 

The closure of Folsom Point by the Bureau of Reclamation will have a deep effect on our family community. We 

take our children to Folsom Lake to swim, bike, hike, fish, boat, & enjoy nature. This is our only access to the lake 

in this area. 

Closing it will hurt businesses & have a definite financial impact. Businesses in this area have already been hurt 

by the closure of Folsom Dam. It will also effect housing in the area. 

The environmental impact also needs to be investigated before any decision is made.

Folsom citizens were not given proper notice of this "Proposed" closure. 

Please help prevent this closure.

Thank you,

Angie McLaughlin ( Folsom Resident)
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Mike Finnegan [MFINNEGAN@mp.usbr.gov]

Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 2:42 PM

To: Shawn Oliver

Subject: Fwd: Closure

>>> Liz Young <write2liz@yahoo.com> 01/19 11:58 AM >>>

To whom it may concern;

 

 I strenuously object to the proposed closure of Folsom Point State Recreation Area. 

This proposition is unacceptable to me and

 to the citizens of Folsom and our surrounding communities. Folsom Point is used by many 

thousands of community members throughout the year for outdoor recreation (walking, 

biking, running, boating and

picnicking) and sometimes just contemplation. The closure would be an outrage and 

detrimentally impact the quality of life for those in Folsom. Since the Dam Road closed, 

it has been the only access to Folsom Lake within the City of Folsom and has been a 

serious draw for visitors as well.

 

 Please choose an alternative solution, as closing Folsom Point is absolutely 

unacceptable. Thank you for your consideration.

 

 Liz Young

 182 Dulverton Circle, Folsom

---------------------------------

No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go 

with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
Porter, Stacy

From: Teresa Romero [teresaromero@comcast.net]

Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:46 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Point

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

To whom it may concern;

I am concerned about the proposed closure of Folsom Point State Recreation 

Area. It seems that Folsom Point is used by many different people in the 

community for both recreation and just plain old peace and quiet. My husband and

I go up there with our lunch and sit and talk, it has become a place where we can 

relax, be away from all the craziness of our everyday lives. It is so peaceful and 

tranquil up there, overlooking the lake. Please do not take that away from us. 

Please choose an alternative solution, as closing Folsom Point seems tragic to me. 

Thank you for your time.

Teresa Romero

121 Burrill Dr. 

Folsom, CA 95630

 
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Chris Landry [landrycp@yahoo.com]

Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:24 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: folsom point

To Whom It May Concern:

I strongly encourage you to find other options to the Corps of Engineers levee work than 

to closing Folsom Pt. My family and I are frequent visitors to Folsom Pt, and the 

proximity and ease of use of Folsom Pt is one of the primary reasons we chose the 

neighborhood that we now live in. The closure of Folsom Pt is simply unacceptable.

Thank you for your consideration.

Chris Landry

____________________________________________________________________________________

Do you Yahoo!?

Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.

http://new.mail.yahoo.com
Porter, Stacy

From: Carolyn Tatoian-Cain [CTatoian@dtsc.ca.gov]

Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 4:06 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Don't close Folsom Point

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

I strongly object to the proposed closure of Folsom Point State Recreation Area! This proposition is 

unacceptable to the citizens of Folsom and surrounding communities. Folsom Point is used by thousands of 

community members throughout the year for walking, biking, running, boating and having picnics. It's closure 

would be an outrage. Folsom Point is the only access to Folsom Lake in the City of Folsom.Please consider 

alternative solutions, as closing Folsom Point is absolutely unacceptable. 

 

Carrie Cain 

114 Rocky Cove Ct. 

Folsom, CA 95630 
Porter, Stacy

From: Maria Errante [iammer@sbcglobal.net]

Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 12:24 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Apposed to Proposed Closure of Folsom Point State Recreation Area

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

To whom it may concern; 

 

I strenuously object to the proposed closure of Folsom Point State Recreation Area. This proposition is 

unacceptable to me and 

to the citizens of Folsom and our surrounding communities. Folsom Point is used by many thousands of 

community members throughout the year for outdoor recreation (walking, biking, running, boating and 

picnicking) and sometimes just contemplation. The closure would be an outrage and detrimentally 

impact the quality of life for those in Folsom. Since the Dam Road closed, it has been the only access to 

Folsom Lake within the City of Folsom and has been a serious draw for visitors as well. 

 

Please choose an alternative solution, as closing Folsom Point is absolutely unacceptable. Thank you 

for your consideration. 

 

Sincerely, 

 

Maria Errante 

2611 Raleigh Way, El Dorado Hills, CA

P.O. Box 1877 • San Leandro, CA 94577-0276

Tel: 510-614-8890 • 800-834-1004 • Fax: 510-614-1002

January 19, 2007

Shawn Oliver

Bureau of Reclamation

7794 Folsom Dam Road

Folsom, CA 95630

RE: Folsom Dam Safety/Flood Damage Reduction Action Draft EIS/EIR

Dear Mr. Oliver:

The Northern California Marine Association (NCMA), a non-profit trade association,

represents approximately 300 member companies, the majority of which are located in

Northern California. These small business firms represent businesses involved in the

recreational boating industry; including boat dealers, brokers, marinas, boat yards, chandleries,

marine equipment and electronics suppliers, publishers, and marine finance and insurance

specialists. In addition to supplying the needs of California’s 3.5 million boaters and anglers,

the recreational marine industry has a significant impact on the state’s overall economy.

California's Department of Boating and Waterways recently determined that statewide, boating

contributed approximately $16.5 billion to the Gross State Product annually. In addition,

boating contributed $1.6 billion in state and local taxes annually. There were 8,500 boating 

related businesses in the state that provided more than 284,000 jobs to the economy.

The economic health of Northern California’s recreational marine industry depends on 

maintaining access to the area’s navigable waterways. The alternatives outlined in the Draft

EIS/EIR rely on closing Folsom Point for use for up to seven years as a staging site and storage

area for the project. This proposal would seriously impact recreation access for the

approximately 125,000 annual visitors to the site. Over the six to seven year life of the project

816,021 visitors would be lost. Not only would this severely impact recreational marine

businesses, but it would also impact the area’s local economy, since many of these visitors

patronize local supply shops, restaurants, gas stations, and grocery stores. Furthermore,

disrupting recreational activity at Folsom Point threatens to create congestion at other

entrances to the Folsom Lake Recreation Area. The California Department of Parks and 

Recreation, which operates the Folsom Lake Recreation Area, would suffer a serious economic

loss if this were to occur.

Government Relations Office: 510-334-8866 • Fax: 530-893-1759

E-mail: ncma-gr@comcast.net

NORTHERN 

CALIFORNIA 

MARINE 

ASSOCIATION 
Shawn Oliver

January 19, 2007

Page 2

State Parks already diverts $27 million from the Department of Boating and Waterways’

Harbors and Watercraft Revolving Fund. Those funds, paid for by the gas taxes California

boaters pay to fuel their boats, are used to repair and build marinas, launch ramps, and other

boating facilities throughout the state. The $27 million diversion has already negatively

impacted the Boating Department’s ability to adequately address the state’s boating 

infrastructure needs. Putting further stress on the State Parks’ budget, by closing Folsom Point

for an extended period of time, would likely result in further attempts to divert funds from the

Revolving Fund. Therefore, the economic impact would ripple throughout the state and would

not just be limited to the local area.

At the public hearing at the Folsom Community Center on January 10, several representative

stakeholders from Folsom’s recreational community suggested alternatives that would not so 

severely impact access. They suggested that the Bureau and the Corps host a series of forums

with the stakeholders to identify mutually beneficial alternatives. The NCMA strongly supports

this suggestion. We believe that there are alternatives that would allow the Bureau and the

Corps to carry out its vital work without crippling the local and state recreational community.

The NCMA would also be more than happy to participate in and to contribute to this process.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions, please contact me at

510-334-8866 or at ncma-gr@comcast.net.

Sincerely,

(Ms) M’K Veloz

Administrative Director

Cc: Becky Victorine, USACOE
Porter, Stacy

From: Jane Pearson [So_sure@mindspring.com]

Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 9:54 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Lake access closures

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

I am sickened to hear that Dyke 8/ Folsom Point has a planned closure. I object to this decision as it is the only 

access to the residence of Folsom on this side of the lake. We just bought a boat and launching is already 

problematic due to over crowded conditions. I cannot fathom how we will be able to access the lake as the 

proposed closures will no longer make boating feasible for those of us on the East (?) side of the lake.

 

I live near Briggs Ranch Road. I've lost easy access to Roseville and I-80 North bound due to the closure of the 

Dam road, now I am hearing that my close residential boat launch access is being curtailed. I have been a 

resident of Folsom for 20 years and each "improvement" has adversely effected my quality of life. Please don't 

close Folsom Point to the residence of the city. Please explore other options that are available.

 

Sincerely,

Jane Pearson

 

351-1575

 

 
Porter, Stacy

From: JENNIFER OBENAUS [jenniferobenaus@comcast.net]

Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 9:41 AM

To: rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil; soliver@mp.usbr.gov; mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Former Dyke 8

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

Please do not close this valuable and heavily utilized recreation area. It is a part of our neighborhood and one of 

the reasons we chose to live here.

 

Thank you,

 

Branton and Jennifer Obenaus 

131 Briggs Ranch Drive

Folsom, CA 95630
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Michael.V.Avakian@jci.com

Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 9:18 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Cc: Rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil

Subject: Folsom Point Closing - Please Do Not Close

Mr. Oliver,

I am a recent resident of Briggs Ranch. A major decision in moving to this neighborhood 

was the Lake access at Folsom Point. We lead a very active life and enjoy the close Lake 

Access and have become very concerned that Folsom Point would be closed to Stage the 

construction of a new Dam Road.

I ask that the team please consider a new location for staging their equipment. Why would

this project want to impact the quality of life for Folsom Residents in such a negative 

manner. Please consider other locations.

Thanks,

Michael Avakian

Sales Engineer

Johnson Controls

916-294-8811
Porter, Stacy

From: Kari MacTaggart [kmactee4@comcast.net]

Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 11:01 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Closing Folsom Point is the wrong thing to do

Page 1 of 2

1/22/2007

Hello,

I recently became aware of the proprosal to close Folsom Point in order to increase 

flood protection.

I have been a Folsom resident for the past 16 years and 2 years ago I was finally 

able to purchase a boat.

My familiy and I use it year round exclusively in Folsom Lake for water sports, 

fishing, picnics etc.

Folsom point is not only the best access on the whole lake, it is the most convenient 

for us.

I have attempted to put my boat in at both Browns Ravine and Granite Bay in the 

past. While Browns Ravine is not that far away, 

the boat ramp is often extremely crowded and the boat trailer parking is limited 

when the water level is high as it is for several months

during peak fishing and boating season. Granite bay is at least a half hour drive 

away, and also it is often crowded due to the easy

access from I80. If Folsom Point was closed for the proposed 6 years I a very sure 

that the utilization of my boat would be cut in half

if not more. My kids are in their early teens and we have been able to strengthen 

our family bond through our many outings on our boat.

By the time Folsom Point opens up again, my kids will be going away to college. 

Essentially this means we would miss out on critical time

with our children during their teenage years. This prospect troubles my wife an I greatly.

 

In addition to the loss to my family, I am also concerned about the loss to the Folsom 

economy. We have already suffered business loss due to the damn

road closing....now this. I am one of those people who thows money into the Folsom economy 

to support my boating lifestyle. If that lifestyle is significantly cut back, I will

be significantly cutting back on the money I spend in Folsom to support my boating activities. 

This includes fuel, food, drinks, boating accessories, and maintenance costs.

This kind of scenario will likely happen to a lot of Folsom boating families and the city business 

will also suffer from the loss of people coming from out of town to use Folsom Point.

 

I personally do not understand why another area can not be used in the same capacity as the 

proposal for Folsom point. For instance the old parking lot by the dam

has not been used in years. At the very least if the proposal for closing Folsom Point does get 

approved it should require that better access and trailer parking should be provided

at Browns Ravine to help make up for the loss.

 

Thanks for allowing me to comment on this subject
 

Marcus MacTaggart

129 Penwood Lane

Folsom,California 95630

Page 2 of 2

1/22/2007
Porter, Stacy

From: Jill Ellis [ellis4@comcast.net]

Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 11:09 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: The closing of Folsom Point

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

Dear Mr. Oliver,

I live in the Briggs Ranch area in Folsom, and I am hearing that the Bureau of Reclamation is planning on closing 

Folsom Point while the bridge is under construction. I urge you not to do that. Folsom Point is a place where 

many people walk their dogs, go for runs and use the boat ramp for water recreation. During the summer Folsom 

Point is so busy. Closing it would cause major traffic congestion at the other boat ramps. One of the reasons I 

chose Briggs Ranch to live was because it is so close to the lake. I understand there needs to be an area for the 

bridge construction equipment, but please consider a different area. Closing Folsom Point for seven years would 

not be the right decision.

Thank you for listening!

Jill Ellis
Porter, Stacy

From: LEONARD AND MAIR AUERBACH [xxa@webtv.net]

Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 10:52 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: folsom point closure

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

i am writing to object strongly to any idea of closing folsom point, also to the underhand way 

this whole affair appears to have been handled. mair auerbach
Porter, Stacy

From: ltomiak@comcast.net

Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 6:41 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Closure of Folsom Point Dam Retrofit EISR

Page 1 of 2

2/9/2007

Mr Oliver, 

I writing you to voice my opposition to planned closure of Folsom Point. This proposal will impact this 

community in such a severe way that it may never recover, destroying the lives and financial stability of 

residents still struggling to recover from the closure of the dam road. Your planned proposal will not 

only effect the quality of life but the health and safety of residents and wildlife. 

 

 

According to the Bureau's Findings: 

 

Destruction of wetlands or possible permanent loss of wetlands 

The loss of wetlands will effect many species of birds, mammals, protected amphibians, fish, and 

endangered insects. Our need for more water is going to impact the wildlife of the lake possibly forever.

 

Damage to Water Quality:

Folsom lake is known for its beautiful clear water. Families flock to enjoy it. The increased turbidity 

and siltation will make this impossible. 

 

Air Quality 

This is my greatest concern. I live in Brigg's Ranch, the neighborhood directly across the street from 

Folsom Point. I have two daughters that have asthma. Your own study says that NOx and Particulate 

PM10 emissions will exceed deminiis thresholds. How is this going to effect their already challenged 

lungs? How are they going to hang out in their own backyard when you poison the air? What are the 

long term effects of breathing these chemicals. Another issue to air quality is the naturally occurring 

asbestos in the soil, it is not an issue until you start moving it around. The soil relocation and blasting 

will put these carcinogenic chemical into the air to poison Folsom Families. 

 

Significant Impact to Roadways: 

Getting around Folsom has been challenging to say the least since the Dam Road closure. Natoma 

Street is already severely overcrowded, the addition of construction traffic will make it impossible to 

navigate the city and dangerous for residents. Emergency vehicles may have difficulty responding to 

emergencies due to traffic congestion. The increase of traffic will also damage our roadways. 

 

Permanent Loss Of Lake Views:

Many of us in Folsom bought our homes because of Folsom Lake and the beautiful views. This 

proposed closure is going to adversely effect the property values of our homes. This will have a huge 

impact on the financial stability of this community. The loss of lake views is going to eliminate the very 

reason we moved to this community. 

 

Increased Noise Levels: 

According to your study Noise levels will surpass levels at the three receptor sights. Day and nighttime 

noise will be an issue. Daytime blasting will cause loss of quality of life and possible damage to our 

homes. The solution of scheduling truck traffic during daytime hours will only further impact our 
roads. How are residents supposed to deal with the increase noise levels. You are destroying our 

quality of life. 

 

Change in Folsom Point State Park:

What will be left of Folsom Point after your proposed project? With increased water levels how much 

of our park will remain? 

 

Loss Of Recreation: 

I personally use Folsom Point on an almost daily basis. I enjoy morning walks around the lake for 

exercise, my dog enjoys walking and swimming in the lake, my family picnics and celebrates special 

events in the picnic area, boating and fishing are also family favorites. The lake and easy access is why 

we bought our home where we did. If you close Folsom Point the other local boat launches will be 

overwhelmed and unable to handle the added traffic. 

 

Public Works:

Folsom recently went through the headache of putting in the Natoma pipeline. This was a necessary 

inconvience for residents. Your proposal includes the possible damaging or relocation of this pipeline. 

What impact will this lead to on our community. It also mentions the creation of solid waste. This is a 

beautiful state park you are callously using as cement factory and staging area. This delicate 

environment and the many animals that call it home could be permanently destroyed and that is just too 

high a price for more water. 

 

One issue you did not address was our resident Eagle (aka lovingly known as Folsom) Although the 

Bald Eagle may no longer be on the endangered species list, it is still protected by the "Bald and Golden 

Eagle Protection Act" It is my understanding one of the afforded protections is not to disturb the nesting 

area or flight pattern. Is your proposal in violation of this Act? 

 

Folsom is a wonderful family oriented community, the proposed closure of Folsom Point will destroy 

our quality of life. Please develop an alternative plan that will not create such adversity. 

 

Sincerely, 

Lisa Tomiak 

144 Singer Lane 

Folsom, CA 95630 

 

(916) 671-9808 

Page 2 of 2

2/9/2007
1

Porter, Stacy

From: jackie kolander [Jackie_kolander@comcast.net]

Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 8:18 PM

To: Rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil; soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Point closing for 7 years. 

I grew up water skiing on Folsom Lake, and although I don't water ski there right now, it 

is one of the reasons we chose to move into Briggs Ranch 9 years ago when coming back to 

this area after college. We use the area to hike to often as a family and walk from our 

home. Closing the bridge for 7 years is unreasonable amount of 

time. My kids will be grown and out of the house in 6 - 10 years. 

Closing the bridge for that long will change the memories we have of hiking and exploring 

along the lake shore. It will affect the property values in Briggs Ranch. It is not 

reasonable to close off a highly utilized access to Folsom Lake because of the 

construction of 

the new bridge for a period of 7 years. I want you to know I object 

to closing Folsom Point, as one of the great things about living here is access to the 

lake.

Sincerely,

Jackie Kolander
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Dan [dsconstruction@onemain.com]

Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 10:48 PM

To: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov; soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Cc: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Point "Recreation" area ??!!

To whom this may concern.

The Folsom Point Recreation Area (FPRA) is just what it is called; a "recreation Area".

However, the unnaceptable and unnecessary closure to the area would require a name change.

What is sad is that there are alternative sites which can be used for the same purpose as 

that which the FSRA would serve. 

Also the unforseen costs (the adverse of the benefits of having the rec. area) to the 

community which has come to depend on it as a way of life would and do far outway the 

costs of forgoing the use of this site for another one.

These benefits such as : biking, boating, running, walking, nature seeking, picnicing and 

simpley a place to relax from the everday stresses the local and regional taxpayer 

encounters.

Having the recreation area is not a luxury to the people of Folsom and its surrounding 

areas BUT a Necessity!

Therefore it is strongly reccomended and ecouraged that another site is chosen. It must 

be unstood that at any additional cost, it is well worth it to adapt another site than 

that of the FPRA.

Thank you,

DS
1

Porter, Stacy

From: John and Cheryl Mandsager [johnmandsager@comcast.net]

Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 8:12 PM

To: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov; soliver@mp.usbr.gov; rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil

Subject: Don't Close Folsom Point!

Importance: High

Return-path: <johnmandsager@comcast.net>

Received: from d5email.usbr.gov [137.77.5.13]

by ibr2mprogw.mp.usbr.gov; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:12:44 -0800

Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net ([63.240.77.81]) by d5email.usbr.gov with NetIQ 

MailMarshal (v5.5.6.6)

id <B001f48eac>; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 04:12:44 +0000

Received: from mandsager2 (c-67-172-126-184.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[67.172.126.184])

 by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP

 id <2007011904123601100hicgne>; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 04:12:36 +0000

From: "John and Cheryl Mandsager" <johnmandsager@comcast.net>

To: <mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov>,

<soliver@mp.usbr.gov>,

<rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil>

Subject: Don't Close Folsom Point!

Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:11:36 -0800

Message-ID: <EFEOLIEGJADHLDNHOLGGAEIOCMAA.johnmandsager@comcast.net>

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/plain;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

X-Priority: 1 (Highest)

X-MSMail-Priority: High

X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)

X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028

Importance: High

We understand the Bureau of Reclamation is proposing to close Folsom Point/Dyke 8 to all 

visitors for a duration of up to 7 years effective Fall

2007 while the Folsom Dam is retrofitted. While we support the dam project, we understand

there are many other alternatives that have yet to be explored. These alternatives would 

allow Folosm Point to remain open to the public.

Since we enjoy visiting Folsom Point many, many times a year, this closure would have a 

negative impact on our family. We imagine the impact on most, if not all, of the families

in our neighborhood would be the same. We urge the Bureau of Reclamation to pursue the 

Dam project in a manner that will allow Folsom Point to remain open to the public.

Thank you.

John and Cheryl Mandsager

110 Woodard Lane

Folsom CA 95630




Porter, Stacy

From: Miller, Rick [rmiller@amerisourcebergen.com]

Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 12:38 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; Rebecca.A.Victorine@usace.army.mil.

Subject: Re: Folsom Lake Dam Retro Fit

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

Dear:

 Mrs. Vicky Victorine

 Mr. Shawn Oliver 

I am writing as to my opposition to any plan to use the area known as MIAD (N. of Green Valley Rd, 

E. of Natoma) for any staging, construction, rock crushing and any like activity regarding the Folsom 

Lake Dam construction project.

I am a resident of Folsom and live in the foothills community of Empire Ranch which is across from 

Green Valley Rd. The noise levels are already extremely high from normal road activity 24 a day. As 

noted in the current Executive Summary, noise levels will increase to unacceptable levels. This valley 

is shaped like a bowl, so noise would travel without being muted.

Also, the prevailing wind comes out of the north blowing across the current structure over our 

community. In addition to ‘carrying’ the noise further distances, a potentially greater issue or threat 

to this family community is the exposure to asbestos and other construction dust and debris and the 

health problems these will create now and in the future.

In closing, the option would be unacceptable and would likely lead to considerable resident disruption 

and legal activity.

Please feel free to call me. Thank you 

Rick Miller

1709 Dornie Cirlce

Folsom, CA 95630 

AmerisourceBergen

Director of Sales, Alternate Care - West Region

916.983.1650 - Office

916.847.1650 - Cell

845.483.1822 – Fax. 
1

Porter, Stacy

From: David.B.Graves@jci.com

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 2:38 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; Rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil

Subject: Shock - The closing of Folsom Point 

Shawn Oliver

Becky Victorine,

I am strongly opposed to the closing of Folsom Point. I have lived in Folsom for 17 years

and I am currently building a custom home in the Vista Del Lago development on East 

Natomas right next to the Lake. One of our major decisions to build in that custom 

development was the proximity to the Folsom Point recreation area. I have (2) teenage 

boys 14 & 16 and own a ski boat to enjoy family time with them. The next 5 years are 

critical & special years for us as a family prior to both of them going off to college. 

My wife and I created a strong long term plan to build and enjoy their High School years 

in our new custom home right up the street from Folsom Point. Our whole family enjoys 

boating, picnicking, and jogging at the lake for family time. All of which we do by 

accessing the Lake at

Folsom Point. You can imagine our disappointment and shock when it was

announced January 9th 2007 the Folsom Point recreation area would be closed for the next 

seven years. This would devastate us as a family let alone our life investment into the 

custom home we are building just up the street from Folsom Point. Our house is 

approximately 2 months from completion and I can only imagine what this is going to do to 

its value and our Family plan of living in this new house. You just can not get back 

these next 5 years that we are entering into with our boys. These years only come once in

a life time and we thought we had a very solid plan ready to be realized in a couple of 

months.

I urge you to reconsider this plan. Please find another location to stage construction 

that would cause much less impact for seven years. Many sites come to mind, primarily the

look out point on the dam road which is already inaccessible to the public. That is a 

huge area in close proximity to your project. Even if a temporary boat launch is required

for project construction access to the lake it would be a straight shot to the dam and 

completely accessible from the dam road that is already closed to traffic.

To build a boat launch when the lake is low would be a much better idea for all. 

Financially I am sure it would calculate out as well when compared to the lost revenue of 

losing Folsom Point for 7 years, and to the lost revenue to the local businesses that 

rely on the Lake. The increased traffic at Folsom Point on Natomas street and loss of 

property values would be a huge negative impact to the City of Folsom Residents.

Also, there is plenty of state land on either end of the dam road that could be utilized 

for construction staging as well that would create less impact to the City of Folsom. 

Please provide an impact report for consideration of all of these sites prior to taking 

the easy one of Folsom Point.

Please consider the Fiscal Impact to the many Folsom Residents & Local Businesses that 

have a similar story to mine. Please understand the additional stress of building a 

custom home for the last two years right down the street from the lake access that was 

just announced to be closed for seven years.

I throw myself at your mercy and plea with you to find another location more suitable for 

the community.

Thank you for your consideration. Please keep me informed via e:mail or telephone to the 

outcome of this decision.

Have a good day!

David Graves

(Folsom Jr. Bulldog & High School Coach) Account Executive- Major Projects Johnson 
2

Controls, Inc.

103 Woodmere Road Suite 110

Folsom, CA 95630

Tel# 916 294-8808

Fax# 916 294-8889
Porter, Stacy

From: John and Sandii Dalessi [dalessi8@comcast.net]

Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 9:52 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov; rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil

Subject: Proposed Closure of Folsom Point

Page 1 of 1

1/24/2007

To whom it may concern; 

We strongly object to the proposed closure of Folsom Point State Recreation Area and urge 

you to choose an alternative solution. Folsom Point is used by many thousands of community 

members in the Folsom and El Dorado Hills area throughout the year for outdoor recreation 

(walking, biking, running, boating and picnicking) and sometimes just contemplation. The 

closure would be an outrage and detrimentally impact the local economy and quality of life for 

those in Folsom. Since the Dam Road closed, it has been the only access to Folsom Lake 

within the City of Folsom and has been a serious draw for visitors as well. Please choose an 

alternative solution, as closing Folsom Point is absolutely unacceptable. Thank you for your 

consideration.

 

Sincereley

John and Sandii Dalessi

El Dorado Hills

1

Porter, Stacy

From: Leard, Thomas E. [tom.leard@hp.com]

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:19 PM

To: themayor@folsom.ca.us

Cc: rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil; mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: "PROPOSED' CLOSURE OF FOLSOM POINT STATE PARK (AKA) DYKE 8) by BUREAU 

OF RECLAMATION AND U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

January 24, 2007

To: Mayor Andy Morin

CC: Shawn Oliver at Bureau of Reclamation & Becky Victorine at U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers

RE: "PROPOSED' CLOSURE OF FOLSOM POINT STATE PARK (AKA) DYKE 8) by BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 

AND U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Please be advised that we, citizens of Folsom, CA have been put on notice that a proposed 

closure of our local state park is scheduled for the fall of 2007. The 100% closure is 

for a lengthy period of 6 - 7 years. This proposal comes from the Bureau of Reclamation 

and the U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers. It is our understanding that our beautiful park and recreation 

area will be used as a construction staging area for different work projects on the dam 

and Mormon Island Spillway by the Bureau and Army Corps of Engineers.

It is our belief that this closure will have deep and dramatic effects on families, 

businesses, tourism and the environment. The consequences are far reaching. This is a 

family community. We bring our children to the lake to walk, bike, swim, picnic, fish, 

boat and just enjoy nature.

This scenario is repeated over and over again. Folsom Point is one of the primary reasons

people buy homes in the area. The park is one of the jewels of Folsom. Bird watchers 

frequent the park. I might point out that even though the Bald Eagle is no longer on the 

endangered species list, it is still protected by the "Bald and Gold Eagle Protection 

Act". It is my understanding that one of the afforded protections is not to disturb the 

nesting area or flight pattern area.

This needs more investigation at Folsom Point Park. We have not been given adequate enough

time to investigate the impact that this proposal will have on our environment. We have 

other migratory birds that now nest there as well. This is a pathway for many other 

animals as well.

The business in Folsom will definitively realize a negative impact. Our business owners 

look forward to the summer months when tourists and other lake traffic provide much needed

revenue. Our businesses suffered with the closure of Dam Road across Folsom Dam, and now 

this may be the proverbial "straw" for financial loss. Business owners have expressed a 

great concern.

We do not oppose positive improvements on the dam. But, we request a staging area that 

will not hurt so many families, livelihoods, wildlife, and real estate values. In all 

truth we have not been given adequate time in which to address these issues. Our first 

notice was on January 9th, 2007. We were advised that 3,000 flyers were sent out. This 

is a city with a population of 63,000. The deadline given us to discuss the closure is 

Friday Jan 25th, 2007. That is essentially "no notice." We need counsel as to our rights

and the right of the wildlife who cannot speak for themselves.

We ask you, as our voice and representatives, to please aid us in this endeavor.

Respectfully,

Thomas E. Leard

Concerned Citizen and Resident of Folsom, California.

916-294-0199
Porter, Stacy

From: pmjklugo@sbcglobal.net

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:42 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; Rebecca.A.Victorine@usace.army.mil

Page 1 of 1

1/25/2007

My family and I moved to Folsom recently for amny reasons but one of the main reason was Folsom Lake. We 

bought our home in Empire Ranch partly because it was close to Folsom Point boat launch. 

 

The idea of closing this access point would essentually take away a large family activity. My children are currently 

6 and 8 which mean if Folsom point was to close for 7+ years then this would prevent us from this enjoyment. 

 

Please - DO NOT CLOSE!

 

Phil, Jacqueline, Joshua and Gianna Lugo

Folsom, CA

 

PS: Brown Revine is already impacted for many summer weekends as it is - closing Folsom Point would make 

this situation worse.
Porter, Stacy

From: Theodore White [tjwhite6693@sbcglobal.net]

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:18 PM

To: themayor@folsom.ca.us

Cc: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov; Rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil

Subject: PROPOSED CLOSURE OF FOLSOM POINT

Page 1 of 1

1/25/2007

This e-mail is in protest of the possibility of closing Folsom Point during the building of the new span 

across the American River. 

 

After 911 the dam road was closed creating a hardship on many people and businesses. Instead of using 

less fuel for our vehicles we increased gas usage. The reason for the closure was that someone could 

blow up the dam from the roadway. I'm a retired California Highway Patrolman and I know that anyone 

that wants to can blow up ANY dam they want to can by filling a boat up with explosives and driving it 

into the dam itself. This would cause more damage than a vehicle sitting on the road at the top of the 

dam with explosives. Now, your considering closing Folsom Point for the duration of building the new 

span. 

 

I have a boat and use Folsom Point every week during the summer. The launching areas available now 

are so busy in the summer that there's a good chance you can't even get in. On the weekends when the 

weather is exceptional all of the parking facilities for the lake fill up quickly. If you close Folsom Point 

that leaves only one other facility on the east side of the lake, Browns Ravine, to launch. Browns 

Ravine is very limited in parking. 

 

I know for a fact that there are other places on the dam property that could be used, i.e. the parking lot at 

the east end of the bridge is an ideal place. It would be out of the way and would not affect anybody. 

Thousands of residents have been affected with the closure of the dam road and now thousands more 

will be affected. 

 

From the flyer's I've read the public was given notice on January 9, 2007 with with 3,000 

flyer's????????????? The city of Folsom has a population of approx 63,000 and then there's El Dorado 

Hills and other surround cities that use Folsom Lake We were given a deadline to discuss the closure 

of January 22, 2007. Our elected officials are suppose to look at the overall picture and do what's right 

for the residents in the area - THIS WHOLE THING SMELLS TO ME.............. 

 

Please think of the public when you make your decision as to this issue. 

 

PS: We moved to your city to have quick access to Folsom lake. If you close Folsom Point I would 

consider moving........... 

 

Ted and Maggie White 
Porter, Stacy

From: Dearoledad@comcast.net

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:27 PM

To: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov

Cc: Folsom point

Page 1 of 1

1/25/2007

To whom it may concern, 

It seems that you think that all the rest of the launches will handle the extra traffic that closing Folsom 

point would create do not do this. I pay taxes and fees just like everyone else. 

Mark Rucker 
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Nigel Olding [nigelolding@comcast.net]

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:37 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Cc: rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil; Kris Olding

Subject: RE: Folsom Dam Safety and Flood Damage Reduction Draft EIS/EIR

Dear Mr. Oliver,

 I am writing to provide feedback to you about the Draft document published recently.

 As a Folsom resident, I believe that the closure of Folsom Point for up to 7 years 

will be a disaster for the City and local area, and must be reconsidered immediately. The

impact on local business and residents will surely equal the other disastrous decision 

made by agencies out of the local area - namely, the closing of the Folsom Dam road due to

'security threats'. It is plain to me by looking at the condition of the historic area 

that the road closure has had a profound effect on the City, and the closing of facilities

at the dam - Folsom Point - will surely have another negative effect, and hardly can be 

considered a 'fair' or 'shared' impact on the local community. Any plan that calls for 

the closing of existing recreational areas for multiple years, or other huge local impact,

has to be regarded as flawed, particularly in light of the damage done to the City in the 

last few years by similar ill-considered closures.

 What are the other options that were considered and discarded? Why can't a staging 

area be constructed elsewhere to have a lesser impact on the existing recreational 

facilities? A project of this magnitude should surely be capable of including the 

construction of a staging area in an area with less impact. If not, why not?

 Please amend this draft plan to include staging in an area that will have far less 

local impact.

 Thank you.

 Also, I would like to point out that the EIS/EIR PDF documents are currently 

unavailable for review at the www.usbr.gov/mp website - any attempt to access them simply 

crashes the browser (Internet Explorer, Firefox or Opera). Is there an explanation for 

this sorry state of affairs?

 Yours sincerely,

 Nigel Olding

 111 Arrowsmith Dr

 Folsom, CA 95630
Porter, Stacy

From: Beth Beckmann [bradyandbeth@yahoo.com]

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:21 PM

To: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.vov; soliver@mp.usbr.gov; Rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil

Subject: Folsom Point Closure

Page 1 of 1

1/25/2007

To all concerned, 

 

Our family was astonished when we heard of the possibility of Folsom Point closing. 

 

We moved to Folsom 6 years ago and access to the Lake was one of our key purchase decisions. We 

bought a boat because of our vicinity to the lake. We poured a driveway and re-landscaped our yard to 

store our boat. We have purchased an annual pass every year and we use the lake all of the time!! Our 

kids are 7 and 10. They both learned to kayak, kneeboard, waterski on doubles then on a single ski and 

now are venturing into wakeboarding. We go fishing, swimming and sometimes just drive around the 

lake and meet up with friends to have picnics and enjoy our incredible surroundings. 

 

Closing Folsom Point will dramatically effect the quality of our lives. It is not like we can just drive 

down the road and launch at Brown's Ravine. The other launch ramps will NOT be able to keep up with 

the demand on the lake. Most of us will be turned away on the weekend. 

 

A seven year closure will mean that our "Family Time" on the boat is gone. Gone until my kids are 14 

and 17. High school and college age. In essence, the rest of their childhood. Please do something to 

STOP THIS!!! 

 

Is it possible to stage the work equipment on property closer to the Dam Road or the prison? I just 

cannot fathom another hit on the residents and businesses of Folsom. 

 

Please recognize this decision a complete disaster for the residents of Folsom. 

 

I sincerely appreciate your efforts to find another solution to this problem. 

 

Thanks in advance, 

Brady, Beth, Kristen and Alex Beckmann 

 

Be a PS3 game guru. 

Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
Porter, Stacy

From: Brett Heeke [bheeke33@comcast.net]

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:41 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Point closure proposition

Page 1 of 1

1/25/2007

I am a Folsom Resident living within walking distance to Folsom Point/Dyke 8 and am very opposed to 

the proposition of closing the Folsom Point.access. 

 

This will be heavily destructive to our community and a lifestyle which makes Folsom such a 

great place to live. 

 

Please use all means necessary in finding an alternative for the Folsom Dam retrofit project. 

 

Sincerely, 

Brett Heeke 

104 Fath Court 

Folsom, CA 

 
Porter, Stacy

From: Matt Henry [mattwhenry@gmail.com]

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 3:04 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Dam Upgrades

Page 1 of 1

1/25/2007

Dear Shawn Oliver, 

 I am sending you this e-mail to voice my opinions about the Folsom Dam Upgrades. I think that 

upgrading Folsom Dam is an excellent project. My feeling is that it is not a matter of if there is another 

major flood in the area only a question of when. Post Hurricane Katrina I don't think is responsible to 

ignore any reasonable opportunity to improve flood control. I am a White Water Guide on the South 

Fork of the American River and so my initial thoughts regarding dams are ushally negative. however, I 

think this is a very positive project. I'm sure you know the arguments better than I regarding this project 

so I will not rehash what I know. I am a local Sacramento resident and spend much time around Folsom 

lake. Thank you for your consideration. 

 

Matt Henry 

(760)715-9920 

PO Box 432 

Davis, CA 95617 
Porter, Stacy

From: Mssonarita@aol.com

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 3:03 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: "Proposed" closure of Folsom Pt. State Park

Page 1 of 1

1/25/2007

Dear Mr. Oliver, 

My e-mail message is in regard to the "proposed" SEVEN" year closure of Folsom Point 

State Park (AKA Dyke 8), with the purpose being, to use this beautiful state park as a 

staging area for different work projects on the dam and Mormon Island Spillway. I just 

cannot figure out why in the world, the Bureau of Reclamation and the U.S. Army 

Corp of Engineers, would ever make this decision, when there are other properties available, 

nearby, in which to use as a staging area? 

Closing a California State Park to thousands and thousands of families, for SEVEN years 

makes absolutely no sense to me, and I am outraged!!!! What are you thinking? 

I do not oppose positive improvements to the dam, of course, but there should be more 

consideration, and thought, given to these many, many families, businesses, and the 

environment, of which all, will be directly affected by this ridiculous proposal. Closing 

a very, very utilized state park for SEVEN years is just plain nuts!!! 

Please explain to me why our government came up with this particular site, when there 

are other nearby areas that could be used, with far less impact on the community? 

Our two daughters, and their families, live in Folsom and are absolutely devestated with 

this "proposal". Please, Mr. Oliver, look into your heart, and choose an alternate 

site for this project. 

Sincerely, 

Sonia Deauville 

7461 N. Teilman 

Fresno, Ca 93711 

mssonarita@aol.com 
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Diane Star AndersonHicks [andersonhicks@earthlink.net]

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 11:41 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Lake

To Bureau of reclamation.

We are very concern about the potential closure of various recreations area at Folsom 

Lake. Our family utilizes the Lake at least 2 times a week. How can we obtain more 

information about this issue?

Thank you

Mr. Darrell Fullerton

Mr. Robert Hicks

Mrs. Diane Star AndersonHicks
Porter, Stacy

From: Meisenbud4@wmconnect.com

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 11:50 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: appalled

Page 1 of 1

1/25/2007

AT this idea to close Folsom Pt for 7 years. Why? I find this unacceptable as well. You people are terrible. This 

is a drought year coming up, we take all our kids there to beat the heat. This is the LAST open area of Folsom 

left. F_ck off with this!!!!! 

I'm going to the meetings to protest and I live in Carmichael and vote. 

P McM
Porter, Stacy

From: Patchett, Susan@DCSS [Susan.Patchett@dcss.ca.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 12:09 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Closing Folsom Point 

Page 1 of 1

1/25/2007

Why not use the Folsom Dam Road recreational area for a staging area? There is a large parking lot that could 

be used and also there would access to the lake. 

Susan Patchett 

Department of Child Support Services

Accounting Services Branch

(916) 464-3906

Email-Susan.Patchett@DCSS.ca.gov

 
Porter, Stacy

From: Kelley [pioneerflt@comcast.net]

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 1:49 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Cc: Rebecca.A.Victorine@usace.army.mil

Subject: Folsom point closure opposition

Page 1 of 1

1/25/2007

Dear Mr. Oliver,

Today I read in the Folsom Telegraph newspaper of intentions to close Folsom Point at Folsom Lake. I am 

shocked and dismayed that it is the intent of the government to close a recreation area that is so important to so 

many. Just as the Bureau looked for ways to close the most beautiful scenery (Folsom Dam road) in the area, 

now you look to take away even more from area residents. I go on record as opposing the closure. Surely there 

must be a compromise.

Sincerely,

Mr. Kelley V. Thorn

500 S. Lexington Dr.

Folsom, CA 95630

916 869-1972

 

 

-- 

No virus found in this outgoing message. 

Checked by AVG Free Edition. 

Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.8/649 - Release Date: 1/23/2007 8:40 PM
Porter, Stacy

From: Barbara [bangeja@directcon.net]

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 1:47 PM

To: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov; soliver@mp.usbr.gov; rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil

Subject: Folsom Point

Page 1 of 1

1/25/2007

I am writing to ask you PLEASE do not close Folsom Point(Dyke 8) while you retrofit the Folsom Dam. We 

suffered the loss of our travel trailer spot on Lake Berryessa where we used to launch our boat because of 

Federal Bureau of Reclamation issues and purposely moved to Folsom to be able to continue our pleasurable 

boating, fishing, and waterskiing. If you close Folsom Point, we will never be able to use Brown's Ravine without 

the risk of overcrowding because of the closure of Folsom Point.

We have our son and his family (an 8 yr. old and 4 yr. old) who love to water-ski and go out on the lake in our 

boat.

Please consider other options for your retrofit project and do not close any of the launching facilities on Folsom 

Lake. 

 

I look forward to your reply. 
Porter, Stacy

From: Heather Sibilla [hsibilla@folsom.ca.us]

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 1:11 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: FW: Do not allow the closure of Folsom Point!

Page 1 of 1

1/25/2007

From: gaudyf@comcast.net [mailto:gaudyf@comcast.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 4:17 PM 

To: The Mayor; ericking@folsom.ca.us; corrprincess@ardennet.com; Jeff Starsky; Steve Miklos 

Subject: Do not allow the closure of Folsom Point!

 

City Council Members, 

 

I would like to express my disapproval for any plans to close Folsom Point as was suggested by the Fed 

Govt. The city has already been affected greatly by the quick closure of the Dam Road, and this move 

would severely impact all of the residents of Folsom and the surrounding areas that use Folsom Lake for 

recreation. 

 

Fernando Gaudy 

104 Flood Ct. 

Folsom, 
1

Porter, Stacy

From: allarea@sbcglobal.net

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 10:53 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: E-mail-A-Friend: Folsom Point closure protested

Comment:

We won't stop fighting this just because the comment period ends....look for our full page

add too.

---

Story:

Folsom Point closure protested

Hundreds attend Saturday's rally in effort to save lake access

Protesters angry over the Bureau of Reclamation's proposed closure of Folsom Point showed 

up at the recreation area on Saturday. 

By 12:15 p.m., approximately 150 people filled the parking lot at the corner of East 

Natoma Street and Folsom Point and more continued to stream in throughout the afternoon. 

Many took to the sidewalks to wave signs and encourage drivers to honk in protest.

For more of this story, click on or type the URL below:

http://folsomtelegraph.com/articles/2007/01/24/news/top_stories/01protest.txt

--------------------------------------------------------------------

 This e-mail contains information for the purpose of tracking abuse.

 If you believe this email is offensive or may be considered spam, please visit the 

website http://abuse.townnews.com and create an incident report. From this site you can 

also block messages like this from sending to your email address. Please retain this 

Mail-ID [c74ce0d9ccb2dcb0065b0bbb4fad058e], it's needed to view information associated 

with this message. Click the link below to view the incident.

 http://abuse.townnews.com/?MailID=c74ce0d9ccb2dcb0065b0bbb4fad058e

 Read the acceptable use policy: http://systems.townnews.com/public/aup/

--------------------------------------------------------------------
1

Porter, Stacy

From: bob@premiumheatingandair.com

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 9:02 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Cc: Rebecca.A.Victorine@usace.army.mil

Subject: folsom point closure

Shawn and Rebecca,

I am writing to voice my displeasure with the proposed closure of Folsom Point. As a 

husband and father of two, the recreational access afforded by Folsom Point is an integral

part of my family's outdoor life. We launch our boat to fish, ski and picnic from Folsom 

Point year round. It is unacceptable to fully close a major part of our life for 

convenience and cost savings by construction crews. The remaining launch points for Folsom

Lake will be shut down with regularity during peak season due to severe overcrowding. As 

it is, Folsom Point gets overcrowded occasionally. Please re-consider closing Folsom Point

and create a floating barge and/or temporary platform system for staging equipment. It is 

important to all of us, in Folsom, and beyond, that a part of our livelihood remains 

accessible. Our children's' formative years are the most critical, do not deny their 

opportunities for the sake of convenience. There are more reasons that Folsom Point 

should remain open, but I feel I have stated the most important one. Thank you for reading

this letter and please feel free to respond at any time. 

 Sincerely, Robert Jeffrey

Premium Service at an Affordable Price

Please contact Bob at 916-944-8829 for detailed information regarding commercial or 

residential service, installation and maintenance on any HVAC equipment. 
Porter, Stacy

From: Charlie Parrish [charlesparrish@sbcglobal.net]

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 8:47 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Cc: Rebecca.A.Victorine@usace.army.mil; admindept@folsom.ca.us; sryan@folsom.ca.us; 

prdept@folsom.ca.us; themayor@folsom.ca.us; jstarsky@folsom.ca.us

Subject: Proposed Closure of Folsom Point

Page 1 of 1

1/25/2007

To Bureau of Reclamation & Army Corp of Engineers, 

 

I was shocked this morning to open up the Folsom Telegraph and read about the propsed closure of 

Folsom Point. Along with many of the protestors at Folsom Point last week, I too live in the area and 

my family spends many summer days at Folsom Point picnicing and boating. The entire Folsom Dam 

issue including the road closure has been a real sore spot for me and many Folsom residents and my 

family and adding to that for another seven years is ridiculous. 

 

According to the newspaper article, the city has already proposed alternatives which appear to have gone 

unrecognized by your two organizations. 

 

As you continue to restrict access to the lake more and more, we, the residents of Folsom, become more 

and more angered by your actions. 

 

Look for an alternative and keep access to our lake OPEN!! 

 

Folsom Resident, 

Charlie Parrish 
Porter, Stacy

From: clifford [cbpayne1@comcast.net]

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 8:08 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Point

Page 1 of 1

1/25/2007

I’ve lived in Folsom for 13 years. I have no problem with the closer of the point so that you can do the 

work you need to do. People in this town are greedy, and selfish. They only care about themselves. 

Since the closure of the Dam road traffic has increased on Green valley. I say close Dyke 8 and get rid 

of the drugs, drinking and traffic for the next 7 years. If you go somewhere else in Folsom they will 

only complain over that spot too. 

 
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Victoria Walasek [vickyw@comcast.net]

Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 10:30 AM

To: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov; soliver@mp.usbr.gov; rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil

Subject: Folsom Point

Please keep this place open to boaters!!!

Vicky Walasek
Porter, Stacy

From: benson dawn [predawn2001@yahoo.com]

Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 8:53 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Point Closure

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

As a long standing member of the community of Folsom, I have seen many changes to our community 

throughout the years. I know that the City Leaders could careless if Folsom Point is closed for seven 

years, but the economy is going to be greatly altered for surrounding businesses, not only in Folsom, but 

also El Dorado Hills. Many locals rely on the Spring, Summer and Fall recreational use of the lake to 

greatly supplement their income. Closure of Folsom Point could be disastrous for many local businesses.

Folsom Point is not just a boat launch, but also an area for locals to run, walk and bike throughout the 

year. Seven years (if not longer), is a long time to not be able to enjoy what little of nature we have left. 

As a concerned, uninformed community, we encourage you to find an alternative area to store your 

equipment for upcoming projects. Please, help us to save what little open space we have left to enjoy. 

Think about what affect the closure of Folsom Point will have on other communities, such as El Dorado 

Hills and Granite Bay. The closure could prove to be an overwhelming blow to an already busy, 

overcrowded recreational season. 

Thank you for your time, 

Andy Benson

Never miss an email again!

Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out.
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Teresa Black [teresalblack@hotmail.com]

Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 8:46 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; %20mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Point Closure

To whom it may concern;

I strenuously object to the proposed closure of Folsom Point State Recreation Area. This 

proposition is unacceptable to me and to the citizens of Folsom and our surrounding 

communities. Folsom Point is used by many thousands of community members throughout the 

year for outdoor recreation (walking, biking, running, boating and picnicking) and 

sometimes just contemplation. The closure would be an outrage and detrimentally impact 

the quality of life for those in Folsom. Since the Dam Road closed, it has been the only 

access to Folsom Lake within the City of Folsom and has been a serious draw for visitors 

as well.

Please choose an alternative solution, as closing Folsom Point is absolutely unacceptable.

Thank you for your consideration.

Teresa Black

_________________________________________________________________

Valentine’s Day -- Shop for gifts that spell L-O-V-E at MSN Shopping 

http://shopping.msn.com/content/shp/?ctId=8323,ptnrid=37,ptnrdata=24095&tcode=wlmtagline







Porter, Stacy

From: CoopKiss@aol.com

Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 1:54 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Point Closure

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

S Oliver, 

 

I am writing in protest to the proposed closure of Folsom Point. Many people in this area have purchased 

homes here because of the easy access to the lake. Businesses and residents alike have suffered because of 

the closure of the dam road. Now we are having to take another blow with the possible closure of our access to 

the lake. There has got to be another way to accomplish what needs to be done without closing this park. 

 

The lookout point by the Dam itself sits empty and is already set in an area with easy access to the Dam. The 

road there is already closed and would put no one out. 

 

Please find another way to accomplish your task. 

 

Kristi Cooper 

Folsom Resident 
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Alan Daily [alan@daily.org]

Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 2:31 PM

To: rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil; soliver@mp.usbr.gov; mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov

Cc: alan@daily.org

Subject: Folsom Point

We live a few blocks from Folsom Point and would be very disappointed to have it closed 

for any length of time. Closure and storage of construction equipment would have a serious

negative impact on this residential area.

Please utilize other non-residential and less used areas. Closure would negatively impact 

locals as well as thousands of others who come to the lake for year round enjoyment.

Please remember that the Folsom Dam road has already been closed with a significant 

negative impact. No more, please.

Marilyn Daily

Alan Daily

213 Briggs Ranch Dr

Folsom CA 95630
Porter, Stacy

From: Matt and Emily Brayton [mattemilybrayton@comcast.net]

Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 5:08 PM

To: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov; soliver@mp.usbr.gov; rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil

Subject: Do not close Folsom Point 

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

Ladies and Gentlemen,

 

We appreciate the hard work you are doing for retrofit the Folsom dam; however another alternative needs to be 

found that would allow Folsom Point to remain open to the public. 

 

The economic impact of closing Folsom Point would hurt businesses and home values in the area. The 

availability of Folsom Lake for people to enjoy would be greatly diminished. Already the lake fills quickly on 

summer days. With Folsom Point being closed many recreational enthusiasts would not be able to enjoy the lake.

 

Please do not close Folsom Point.

 

Sincerely,

 

Matt & Emily Brayton

188 Singer Lane

Folsom, CA 95630

916-985-3931
Porter, Stacy

From: Mike Butler [mikebutlerj@yahoo.com]

Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 2:12 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Dam project

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

Dear Shawn, 

As a long time River Park resident in Sacramento, I have lived one block from the American River for 

45 years. Folsom Dam has provided adequate protection during these years. 

If funds are available now, why not complete the unfinished Auburn Dam that would give us 

added flood protection, ample water storage, clean hydroelectric power and recreation. Wouldn't this be 

a better safety valve than one added spillway? 

 

Michael G Butler,Jr 

3850 Breuner Ave 

Sacramento,Ca 95819 

butlerjrmule@aol.com

916-451-6866 

Get your own web address.

Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.
Porter, Stacy

From: Sherri McNear [cody19@pacbell.net]

Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 1:00 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Point Closure

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

To whom it may concern;

 

I strenuously object to the proposed closure of Folsom Point State Recreation Area. This proposition is 

unacceptable to me and 

to the citizens of Folsom and our surrounding communities. Folsom Point is used by many thousands of community 

members throughout the year for outdoor recreation (walking, biking, running, boating and picnicking) and 

sometimes just contemplation. The closure would be an outrage and detrimentally impact the quality of life for 

those in Folsom. Since the Dam Road closed, it has been the only access to Folsom Lake within the City of Folsom 

and has been a serious draw for visitors as well. 

 

Please choose an alternative solution, as closing Folsom Point is absolutely unacceptable. Thank you for your 

consideration. 

 

Have a great day!!

Sherri 
Porter, Stacy

From: Tom Econome [econome@sbcglobal.net]

Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 12:40 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Point

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

Mr. Oliver, 

 

I am writing to express my disappointment regarding the potential closure of Folsom Point. This is the 

ONLY boat ramp my family used in 2006 because of its proximity to our home, ease of use and overall 

courtesy of fellow boaters. I have seen the crowds and heard horror stories regarding lengthy wait times 

and lack of parking at other boat ramp facilities, and do not desire to experience it first-hand. Boating 

traffic is increasing, not decreasing, thus it seems foolish to consider closing one of the needed facilities. 

There must be other alternative sites that will not interfere with the recreational aspects of Folsom Lake. 

Please find a better solution! 

 

Sincerely, 

Sandy Econome 
Porter, Stacy

From: dennis wierzba [gade05@sbcglobal.net]

Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 12:44 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: concerning Folsom dam project

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

Dear Shawn Oliver, Bureau of Reclamation, we are property owners who live not 6mins. from Lake 

Folsom launching area. 

We object serverly the proposal to close down Folsom Point recreation area for storing equipment while 

building a new spillway etc. 

First off we believe as many others that upping security of the orginal dam road was a better option than 

closing it in the first place. Most of which I do believe was politically motivated . 

If dam worked is done there are many other options for storage along the lake edge that would not 

infringe on the recreation of all Folsom residents and others in the surrounding areas. 

For starters there is the Folsom Prison on prime real estate that has access to being right on the lake. 

Lot's of property that could possibly be loaned out to the citizens of this area for your purposes of 

storing equipment. 

If not that idea, there are plenty of spaces along the lake edge to be created that will accomplish the 

same thing without distrubing a beautiful recreation and park area we presently enjoy very much. 

Six to seven years of closing this facility is outrageous and insensitive to the rights of many good 

families in the area. 

We bought our home knowing the asset of living near the lake and having direct access to it was a big 

plus. Our homes in our neighborhood have many boats that use this facility with their family and 

friends. 

I'm sure that this can be worked out to where another location can be made workable. It may take alittle 

more effort to be creative but I do believe it is highly possible to do so. 

Sincerely, Gail and Dennis Wierzba 3311 Bellingham Place E.DH. Ca. 95762. 
Porter, Stacy

From: Linton Brown [LLN01@clearwire.net]

Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 8:54 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Dam

Folsom Dam Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

Mr. Oliver: 

I am staring at this web page: 

http://www.usbr.gov/mp/nepa/nepa_projdetails.cfm?Project_ID=1808. 

which shows a dozen or so reports, all with the same name (or close to it). How utterly unhelpful! 

Can you point out a place where an interested party can discover (in two pages or less) the answer to this 

obvious question? 

What is it that you propose to build (or modify), and when?

The environmental analysis process has reached, indeed gone far beyond, information saturation. It has 

certainly lost track of the need for clarity and conciseness in governmental reports. 

-- 

 Linton A. Brown 

22360 Lariat Lane 

 Red Bluff CA 96080 

 (530) 527-0177 
Porter, Stacy

From: Sharlene and Calvin Kasadate [ckasadat@comcast.net]

Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 8:35 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov; rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil

Subject: Opposition to Closure of Folsom Point State Rec. Area

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

To whom it may concern.

I have heard about the recent proposal to close Folsom Point State Recreation 

Area for up to 7 years, and I am strongly opposed to this closure. We live in 

Briggs Ranch, and often enjoy having convenient access to Folsom Lake. With 

the proposed closure, we would no longer have this access. Many people who 

live in Folsom and the surrounding communities use Folsom Point for all sorts of 

recreational activities (ie-walking, biking, running, boating, etc.). 

I hope you will consider other alternative solutions, rather than the closure of 

Folsom Point. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Sharlene & Calvin Kasadate

104 Estabrook Way
Porter, Stacy

From: Debra Baratta [barattafam4@yahoo.com]

Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 7:47 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Point

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

To Whom it may concern, 

 

I object to the closure of Folsom Point. Folsom Point is one of the only access points here in my 

vicinity to the Lake. We are new business owners to this town and have lived here for almost 8 years. I 

like living here and what this town has to offer. With the closure of the Dam road it not only was an 

inconvenience but had a negative effect on traffic.....I could go on and on. I'm sure you have heard this 

many times. I'm sure this is an important phase in revamping the Dam road, I only hope that there are 

other options to consider. 

 

Thank you, 

 

Deb and Tony Baratta 

Ring'em or ping'em. Make PC-to-phone calls as low as 1¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. 
Porter, Stacy

From: Ray Hart [rhart@geiconsultants.com]

Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 11:19 AM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; Rebecca.A.Victorine@usace.army.mil

Subject: Folsom Dam Safety -- Environmental Review

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

Shawn and Rebecca, this e-mail is to submit comments on the EIS for the Folsom Dam Safety 

improvements. Specifically, my comments pertain to the multi year closure of Folsom Point 

recreation area to create a construction staging area. As you know closure of this highly 

used recreational area will cause millions of dollars in economic impacts to the Folsom 

community. 

 

Have you evaluated another and potentially much less costly alternative to closing Folsom 

Point; which is to lease land from the State of California that is currently used for cattle 

grazing adjacent to Folsom Prison along Natomas road? With the construction of the new 

bridge just downstream of the Dam on recently acquired prison property, it would seem that 

additional land could be leased that would allow for construction operations for both 

projects. Once the new bridge is ready to open, construction traffic for the dam 

improvements could be handled via a temporary traffic light on the new road servicing the 

bridge. 

 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment. I look forward to your response. 

 

 

Raymond D. Hart, P.E. G.E 

Chief Operating Officer & Senior Vice President 

GEI Consultants 

3100 Zinfandel Drive, Suite 500 

Rancho Cordova, CA 95670-6027 

Office: (916) 631-4563 

Fax: (916) 852-6385 

Cell: (916) 752-1911 
Porter, Stacy

From: Jason Fanselau [jason@fanselau.com]

Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 3:59 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; Rebecca.A.Victorine@usace.army.mil

Subject: Folsom Dam Safety and Flood Damage Reduction EIS/EIR 

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

Please consider this e-mail my formal comment in support of the project evaluated in the Folsom Dam 

Safety and Flood Damage Reduction EIS/EIR. 

 

I am in favor of the project and believe that all of the environmental impacts have been sufficiently 

minimized and mitigated for in your plan. 

 

The project is important for the greater metro area of Sacramento and will greatly reduce flood risk to 

the families and businesses that make this area their home. 

 

Thanks to the staff at the US Bureau of Reclamation and the US Army Corps of Engineers for their hard 

work. 

 

Jason

 

Jason Fanselau

6200 Shadowcreek Drive

Carmichael, CA 95608
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Bruce Thomas [brt_brt_brt@yahoo.com]

Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 9:23 PM

To: Shawn Oliver

Subject: I support the Folsom Dam project

Shawn Oliver, Bureau of Reclamation, 7794 Folsom Dam Road, Folsom, CA 93630.

Dear Mr. Oliver,

Folsom Dam upgrades are needed to increase protection against flooding in Sacramento. 

Sacramento currently has the least protection against flooding of any major city in the 

US. Upgrading of Folsom Dam is cost-effective for taxpayers. It also protects the 

environment by reducing the need for new water development projects elsewhere.

Sincerely,

Bruce R. Thomas

2477 Sycamore Ln, Apt G6

Davis, CA 95616
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Jim Carlsen [jimcarlsen@earthlink.net]

Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 3:24 PM

To: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov; soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Cc: bethcarlse@aol.com

Subject: Folsom Point

To Whom in May Concern:

I am writing this note to express my displeasure with the suggestion that you may close 

Folsom Point to use it as a staging area for Folsom Dam repairs. I have lived in Folsom 

for over 15 years and I use the park EVERY DAY. I was there yesterday and saw at least 20

groups of people out enjoying nature and enjoying the resource. Folsom Point is sacred to

our community. I am deeply disturbed that our government would even consider closing a 

well used, existing park. Are you kidding me? For SEVEN YEARS. Are you nuts? There is

alot of land around and certainly you can find a better alternative.

For the record, you already took away the gateway to our community by closing the Dam 

Road. Please be assured that most people in Folsom don't believe that the Dam represented

a "terrorist threat" and that was just a smoke screen that the Bureau decided to hide 

behind.

I'm sorry that this sounds like an impolite note, but when you come up with something as 

absurd as closing a jewel park for 7 years, it is hard to be subtle when expressing an 

opinion. Quite frankly, the Bureau's back to back ideas of closing the Dam Rd and now 

Folsom Point has caused me to lose all confidence in your organization.

Sincerely,

Jim Carlsen

916-425-4921
Porter, Stacy

From: Jeff Angeja [jangeja@comcast.net]

Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 4:14 PM

To: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov; soliver@mp.usbr.gov; rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil

Cc: bangeja@directon.net; jillyandheather@comcast.net; dpiecemaker@sbcglobal.net

Subject: Folsom Point

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

Please, please, please come up with any alternative that does not close Folsom Point (Dyke 8) while you 

retrofit the Folsom Dam. I live less than 10 minutes from Folsom Point and use those facilities all year 

long. I am sure you are aware over 820,000 people use that site. If you close it, all of those people will 

have to use Brown's Ravine, Beal's Point, or Granite Bay. Those places are already overcrowded, and 

what will happen is they will fill up and people will be turned away (as it happens to people at all of the 

locations on holiday weekends even now). In short, if you close this site (one of the largest) it will 

result in a DENIAL of access to all but the lucky few who get to the remaining sites first. This is a 

tragedy, and there MUST be another option. 

 

On a personal note, closing that site will damage my familiy life on multiple levels. I have 2 children (8 

and 4 years old) who love wtareskiing and riding the jet ski with me, and my parents are heavily into 

fishing. My children have been enjoying quality, wholesome family togetherness while learning these 

sports, and if you close Folsom Point for 8 years, THEY WILL NOT HAVE ACCESS TO FOLSOM 

LAKE DURING THEIR CHILDHOOD. They will be well into their teenage years before you reopen it 

under you rcurrent proposal. This is a travesty. 

 

There must be other options. You have already closed the Dam road, which includes that moderatelysized vista point parking lot just before the dam and it has easy access to the water's edge. It seems to 

me that it would not take much to modify that area to use for a staging area for equipment and materials, 

with the added saftety and security of the now-closed Folsom Dam Road being the ONLY access road 

to this alternative site. It may not be as readily available as Folsom Point, but the cost to fix the vista 

point area is a VERY REASONABLE option in light of the loss of wholesome family recreational 

opportunities, not to mention the devastating fiscal impact on local businesses. 

 

I look forward to your response, please. 
1

Porter, Stacy

From: amberkennedy@comcast.net

Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 9:09 PM

To: Shawn Oliver

Subject: Folsom Point

To whom it may concern;

I strenuously object to the proposed closure of Folsom Point State Recreation Area. This 

proposition is unacceptable to me and to the citizens of Folsom and our surrounding 

communities. Folsom Point is used by many thousands of community members throughout the 

year for outdoor recreation (walking, biking, running, boating and

picnicking) and sometimes just contemplation. The closure would be an outrage and 

detrimentally impact the local economy and quality of life for those in Folsom. Since the 

Dam Road closed, it has been the only access to Folsom Lake within the City of Folsom and 

has been a serious draw for visitors as well.

Please choose an alternative solution, as closing Folsom Point is absolutely unacceptable.

Thank you for your consideration.

Amber Kennedy

Folsom resident & avid park user.
1

Porter, Stacy

From: vwandmw@juno.com

Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 9:06 PM

To: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov; soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Closure of Folsom Point

To Whom it May Concern:

It has recently come to my attention that there is a possiblility that

Folsom Point will be closed for the next 7 years. This is the first

that I have heard of this and I am wondering why the public was not notified of this 

earlier. I am a resident of Folsom and I live very close to the Folsom Point entrance. 

I'm concerned about possible noise of the construcion equipment being in such close 

vicinity to my house, disrupting my quiet neighborhood. I'm also concerned about property

values going down due to this and also due to the fact that we no longer will live in 

walking distance to the Folsom Lake entrance, which is a great selling point. Also, we 

will not be able to enjoy boating at Folsom Point. True, Brown's Ravine is only 1 mile 

away, but is much more crowded and will be even more crowded once Folsom Point is closed.

 Are there any other alternatives for places that can be used as a

staging area? What about the big open grassy area off Natoma St. and

Folsom Dam Rd? I believe that is part of the prison property. 

Couldn't that be used instead? Or what about the parking lot of the

overlook on Folsom Dam Road, just before crossing over the dam? 

Please consider other options before using Folsom Point. The Folsom Point entrance is 

very close to residential neighborhoods and would be a great inconvenience and affect our 

quality of life, as well as our property values.

Margaret Wong
Porter, Stacy

From: Ron Wisdom [rwisdom@softcom.net]

Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 7:19 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom CA dam modification

Page 1 of 1

1/22/2007

> I strenuously object to the proposed closure of Folsom 

> Point State Recreation Area. This proposition is 

> unacceptable to me and 

> to the citizens of Folsom and our surrounding 

> communities. Folsom Point is used by many thousands of 

> community members throughout the year for outdoor 

> recreation (walking, biking, running, boating and 

> picnicking) and sometimes just contemplation. The 

> closure would be an outrage and detrimentally impact 

> the local economy and quality of life for those in 

> Folsom. Since the Dam Road closed, it has been the 

> only access to Folsom Lake within the City of Folsom 

> and has been a serious draw for visitors as well.
Porter, Stacy

From: Mark Younger [markyounger@sbcglobal.net]

Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 5:35 PM

To: Shawn Oliver

Cc: Rebecca.A.Victorine@usace.army.mil

Subject: New Folsom Bridge EIR

Page 1 of 2

1/22/2007

I have been unable to complete my reading of the EIR due to the time allotted and the volume of the 

document. 

 

My initial comments are: 

 

1. The road noise currently exceeds noise standards. The City of Folsom has been promising a 

"rubberized road surface" for the past decade. How is the increase in noise of construction traffic going 

to be mitigated? (Tire and exhaust) 

 

2. There is an Elementary School within 400 yards of the site. How will you mitigate harmful 

particulate matter? 

 

3. How and when will the damage to the surrounding roadway be repaired? 

 

4. The original dam road had a traffic burden of less than 10,000. How is the noise impact from the 

increase to 40,000 with the new bridge going to be mitigated? 

 

5. I personally built my home in it's present location for me and my family to utilize the Dyke 8, now 

Folsom Point, facilities. My understanding is the closure will be so long that my elementary 

school children will be out high school when and if the facility is reopened. What additional facilities 

are going to be added to on the south side of the lake to supplement the removal of Folsom Point? 

 

6. Will foot traffic to the lake be allowed or will the the area from Brown's Ravine to Beal's Point be 

inaccessible? (approximately 6 miles) 

 

7. My primary access is thru Briggs Ranch Drive at either light. How many and how long are 

road closures expected to be? 

 

8. What alternate access to Briggs Ranch will be provided during the closures? 

 

9. For how long, where and how many noise sampling stations are going to be utilized to provide 

quantitative noise impact data? 

 

10. For how long, where and how many particulate pollution sampling stations are going to be utilized 

to provide quantitative pollution control? 

 

11. How is the additional road debris from construction going to be cleaned up? 

 

Thank you for you time, 

 

Mark Younger





Porter, Stacy

From: Rana Heller-Church [rheller-church@sbcglobal.net]

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 5:03 PM

To: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Closing Folsom Point

Page 1 of 1

1/23/2007

We are opposed to closing Folsom Point. Don't you think Folsom residents have been inconvienced 

enough. You close the Folsom Dam Road, not Folsom Point. That is the only place we take our boat to 

launch. We paid for a season pass, we should have that opened to us. Had I known, I would not have 

bought a pass. 

 

Rana and Bryan Church 

493 Williams Street 

Folsom, CA 95630 

916/353-1998 
Porter, Stacy

From: Jeanne Pfaff [tahoequeen2003@sbcglobal.net]

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 5:21 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Cc: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Closure of Folsom Point

Page 1 of 1

1/23/2007

To whom it may concern;

I am concerned to hear of the proposed closure of Folsom Point State Recreation Area. This proposition 

isn’t an equitable and sound solution to the problem. We have been residents of Folsom for 7 years. We 

moved to Folsom to be near Folsom Lake and all the beautiful amenities the city of Folsom had to offer. 

Folsom Point is the only boat launch we have ever used and it is used by thousands of community 

members throughout the year for outdoor recreation such as walking, biking, running, boating and 

picnicking. Since the Folsom Dam Road closed, Folsom Point has been the only access to Folsom Lake 

within the city of Folsom and has been a serious draw for visitors as well. The closure of Folsom Dam 

Road was extremely inconvenient for Folsom residents and devastating to many Folsom businesses. 

Closing Folsom Point would be an outrage and will detrimentally impact the quality of life for Folsom 

residents as well as cripple many businesses. This would severely affect the economy in Folsom and 

adversely change the entire dynamics of the city. If there is work to be done or repairs needed, there are 

other alternatives to closing Folsom Point. There would be less of an impact to businesses and residents 

if the work was done during evening hours in the summer and full days in the winter when the weather is 

cold and there is less desire to use Folsom Point.

Please choose an alternative solution, as closing Folsom Point is absolutely unacceptable and not the 

right thing to do to residents of Folsom. 

Thank you for your consideration.

 

Jeanne and Albert Pfaff

(916) 608-9772

-- 

No virus found in this incoming message. 

Checked by AVG Free Edition. 

Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.4/644 - Release Date: 1/22/2007 7:30 AM 

-- 

No virus found in this outgoing message. 

Checked by AVG Free Edition. 

Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.4/644 - Release Date: 1/22/2007 7:30 AM
Porter, Stacy

From: Jeff Hopkins - APR Appraisals [APR.LLC@comcast.net]

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 7:15 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Cc: Rebecca.A.Victorine@usace.army.mil

Subject: Folsom Point

Page 1 of 1

1/23/2007

There are other alternatives to Folsom Point for a staging area.

Please take the time to do some sort of cost/benefit analysis.

Upon hearing of the potential closure, I minimized the impact.

After some thought, I realize the negative impact will be greater than most think.

Please look at the alternatives.

 

Jeff Hopkins

Folsom homeowner
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Rob Dulinski [Rob.Dulinski@SactoHomeLoan.com]

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 4:45 PM

To: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: folsom point

Mr. Finnegan

The idea to close folsom point would be a disaster for the folsom residence and business 

owners. I am a long term folsom resident and would like to be noted as opposing this 

action at folsom point.

Robert dulinski

505 williams street

folsom ca. 95630

916-985-6760
Porter, Stacy

From: shmarak@comcast.net

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 7:14 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Folsom Point

Page 1 of 1

1/23/2007

Mr. Oliver, 

As a resident of Folsom who is not a boater, but who enjoys taking visitors to Folsom Point to view the 

lake and dam, I urge the Bureau not to close this delightful spot to the public! 

As I recall, there was a large public parking lot along the old Folsom Dam Road (Folsom side) which is 

much closer to the dam, and, surely, is not getting any use from the public. Why not use that space as a 

construction staging area since it has already been taken away? 

 

Thank you, 

Arthur D. Shmarak 

Folsom, CA 

shmarak@comcast.net
Porter, Stacy

From: LLondon1@aol.com

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 4:39 PM

To: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: folsom pt. closure

Page 1 of 1

1/23/2007

I have been informed that there is a possibility that Folsom Point might be closed. I am AGAINST such a 

closure. There is little outdoor recreation for the citizens of our community in El Dorado Hills. We go to Folsom 

Point a lot and appreciate the hikes and nature. This is a wonderland in a town of concrete. Please do not let 

Folsom Point close. 

Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

Lori Neal 

Concerned Citizen
Porter, Stacy

From: Troy Warr [troywarr@cpsusa.com]

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 4:35 PM

To: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: We are strongly opposed to closing dyke 8

Page 1 of 1

1/23/2007

We are Folsom residence and feel this is a mistake to suggest closing this area

Troy and Shari Warr

 
Porter, Stacy

From: jhdillon@comcast.net

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 4:14 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Cc: rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil

Subject: Comments on DEIS-EIR for Folsom Dam Safety and Flood Damage Reduction Project

Attachments: Comments on DEIS-EIR for Folsom Dam Safety and Flood Damage Reduction Project

Page 1 of 1

1/23/2007

Mr. Oliver and Mrs. Victorine, 

 

Attached please find my comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmenta Impact 

Report for the Folsom Dam Safety and Flood Damage Control Project. Thank you for this opportunity 

to provide comments on this document, and please send me a copy of the Final EIS/EIR when responses 

to comments are completed. 

 

Sincerely, 

John Dilllon 

105 Sourdough Court 

Folsom, CA 95630 
January 22, 2007 

Mr. Shawn Oliver 

Bureau of Reclamation 

7794 Folsom Dam Road 

Folsom, CA 95630 

soliver@mp.usbr.gov 

Mrs. Becky Victorine 

United States Army Corps of Engineers 

1325 J Street 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil 

RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for Folsom Dam Safety 

and Flood Damage Control Project 

Mr.Oliver and Mrs. Victorine, 

Thank you for this opportunity to provide comments on the Draft Environmental Impact 

Statement/Environmental Impact Report for the Folsom Dam Safety and Flood Damage 

Reduction Project (FDSP). I would appreciate their inclusion in the official record for this 

document, and I look forward to responses to my comments in the Final Environment Impact 

Statement/Report. I acknowledge the level of effort and professional preparation of the 

DEIS/EIR, but I do not believe that it is an adequate assessment of the potential environmental 

impacts of the proposed FDSP which is the topic of the DEIS. In short, I do not believe that the 

DEIS/EIR is an adequate basis for the adoption of a positive Notice of Determination and 

environmental approval by the standards of the federal NEPA regulations, nor with the 

requirements of California’s CEQA regulations. My comments are directed at the areas of 

Project Definition, Scoping of the DEIS/EIR, and the Assessment of Impacts in several 

categories. 

The Project Definition and subsequent assessment of Project impacts are deficient. Analyses of 

the long-term consequences of the Project are not discussed in the DEIS/EIR, and these impacts 

are deferred to a future Facility Management Plan. This is a segmenting of the Project 

Description and environmental assessment process which is not consistent with NEPA and CEQA 

requirements regarding the complete disclosure of foreseeable consequences of a Project which 

will receive federal funds. 

The Facility Management Plan is critical to the assessment of potential environmental impacts 

resulting from the higher Folsom Lake surface elevation which is the objective of the FDSP. The 

DEIS/EIR cannot accurately assess the impacts of the FDSP without consideration of the Facility 

Management Plan as an integral component of the Project Description. Following are comments 
on specific topics which illustrate the inadequacy of the DEIS/EIR as a basis for a positive Notice 

of Determination for the proposed FDSP. Please provide responses to the general comment 

regarding the segmenting of the Project Description, as well as to the following specific 

comments: 

1. The DEIS/EIR is not an adequate assessment of potential Project impacts due to a 

segmented Project Description which does not consider the operations of the expanded 

Folsom Dam facilities. In the absence of the information which is to be provided in a future 

Facility Mangement Plan, it is not possible to accurately assess the impacts of the FDSP in 

several important issue areas. This segmenting of the Project description, and treatment in 

separate environmental reviews does not allow sufficient information for the FDSP, and is 

not consistent with federal and state environmental impact assessment practice and 

requirements. 

2. The DEIS/EIR does not provide information regarding the extra days and extent of 

inundation for areas of the Folsom Lake federal property and surrounding private 

properties as a consequence of the elevated surface level. This deficiency prevents the 

accurate assessment of potential impacts to terrestrial plant and animal species which will be 

displaced for greater periods of time, and forced into smaller habitat areas. This deficiency is 

an example of the infeasibility of segmenting the Project Description into “construction” and 

“management”. The environmental consequences of the FDSP are dependent upon the 

operation of the expanded facility, and cannot be separated in the DEIS/EIR for the proposed 

Project. Please respond by providing additional information about the impacts of additional 

days/weeks of inundation on terrestrial plant and animal species within the FLSRA and 

surrounding private properties. 

3. The DEIS/EIR does not identify portions of the trail network or other public use areas 

within the Folsom Lake State Recreation Area which will be inundated for greater 

periods and to a greater extent than is currently the case. For example, in the Beeks 

Bight/Doton Point area of the FLSRA, the parking lot and many of the trails in the area are 

currently inundated after the spring snowwmelt. With the greater storage capacity and higher 

surface elevation of Folsom Lake, what will be the impact of additional days and areas of 

inundation on specific trails and other public use facilities within the FLSRA? Please 

respond by providing a detailed map of the expanded inundation area of the raised Folsom 

Lake, showing which trails and other public facilities would be impacted. Also, please assess 

the issue of extra days of inundation of areas within and external to the FLSRA in terms of 

lost availability for public use. 

4. The DEIS/EIR does not adequately or accurately assess the construction and long-term 

impacts of the Project on all users of the FLSRA. The DEIS/EIR acknowledges that its 

estimates of FLSRA park usage do not include users who enter on foot, by bicycle or on 

horseback. Based on empiric observation, many park users access the FLSRA on foot, by 

bicycle and on horseback. Therefore, the DEIS/EIR significantly underestimates the total 

number of actual FLSRA park visitors, and specifically excludes any information about trail 

user groups. Please respond by providing additional information about the levels of FLSRA 

park usage including the substantial number of visitors who access Folsom Lake on foot, on 

bicycles and on horseback. Please provide additional information on the number of park 

users who currently use trails or other facilities which will be rendered unavailable by 

expanded inundation, and on the resultant impacts to those specific user groups. Please 

provide specific discussion of the impacts of expanded days/areas of inundation on the Beeks 
Bight/Doton Point Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) trail on disabled park visitors. 

Please discuss impacts to the disabled users of the FLSRA in terms of consistency with the 

requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 

5. The DEIS/EIR does not adequately address Alternatives to the Project as proposed. 

The DEIS/EIR dismisses upstream management of the American River drainage area, as well 

as any consideration of possible downstream flood control constraints or strategies as beyond 

the scope of the Project description. This ignores several potential alternatives to the FDSP, 

for example construction of additional upstream storage capacity. As these are feasible 

alternative to the Project as proposed, they should be considered within the DEIS. 

Thank you very much for your consideration of my comments on the DEIS for the Folsom Dam 

Safety Project, and I look forward to responses to these comments in the Final Environmental 

Impact Statement for the Project, 

Sincerely, 

John Dillon 

105 Sourdough Court 

Folsom, CA 95630 
Porter, Stacy

From: Mary Strauss [marykaystrauss@comcast.net]

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 8:05 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Re closing Folsom Point

Page 1 of 1

1/23/2007

Please do not close Folsom Point. It is our main access to Folsom Lake. I am a Folsom resident and local 

business owner here for 17 years.

 

Thank you.

 

Mary Strauss

104 Kilsby Way

Folsom, Ca 95630
Porter, Stacy

From: amybc1@comcast.net

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 2:54 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; mfinnegan@@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Proposed closure of Folsom Point

Page 1 of 1

1/23/2007

To whom it may concern: 

 

In regards to the closure of Folsum Point State Recreation Area I must say I am greatly opposed to this 

idea. Folsom Point is a wonderful recreational area not only for the communities within Folsom but 

those surrounding it as well. 

 

Many people use this area year round for hiking, biking, running, boating, fishing, etc. and to take that 

away would have a devastating impact on Folsom. 

 

Please reconsider using Folsom Point as a storage area for your equipment while working on the 

levee's. Folsom is a wonderful city who boasts at being "family and community friendly". Don't take 

that away from us. Thank you. 

 

Amy Cooke 

837 Willow Creek Dr. 

Folsom, CA 95630 
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Mike Finnegan [MFINNEGAN@mp.usbr.gov]

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 2:35 PM

To: Shawn Oliver

Subject: Fwd: Closure of Folsom Pt. -Jan.22,2007

>>> "Paul freese" <paulfreese@msn.com> 01/22 1:57 PM >>>

Bureau of Reclaimation-Attn-Mr. Finnegan and Mr. Oliver ,

 I am writting this email to go on your Official Record that our

entire family of seven is completely opposed to the closing of Folsom Point for may 

reasons. We built our first custom house on 107 Jumper Ct in Briggs ranch 16 years ago. 

Our family grew to 4 children plus a grandparent and we needed to build a second custom 

house. This was based on the complete joy of living so close to the beautiful Folsom Pt 

rec. area and boat launch. 

 This second house is at 106 McDerby Ct. which is very close to the Folsom pt entrance. 

We constructed a 6 bedroom 5 1/2

bath custom home that literally was builtby tremendous sweat equity

and

much financial burden but we considered it all worth while because it would be a future 

asset to us as our children grew, went to college , married ,and we retired. Our 

childrens ages are 16,15,13,and 11. All girls. My husband and I are 53 and 51. As you 

can see our huge expenses are quickly coming upon us and our major asset is our beautiful 

custom house that was to be our safety net as means of paying for these financial burdens 

of the

future. 

We have actively used this facility for 16 years and the thought that we could not launch 

our boat or go for a walk there is unbeliviable,. If this facility is closed and used for 

a staging area for construction, Our family will be directly impacted. My mother is 85, 

who lives with us and she

suffers from weakened lung condition which causes he to cough quite a bit now. With the 

added air pollution to our location I am very concerned to what this will do to her 

breathing problems. I also have 2 daughters with asthma - like conditions that will be 

inflamed with the dust and carbon

emmisions. I am very concerned with the increased noise levels that will occur. We have 

a pool and I feel that will limit our use of it greatly. My biggest complaint though is 

what this 6-7 year closure will do to my property value that we worked so hard on all 

these years.

I have been told that there is something called eminent domain that could allow us to sue 

the gov. for restitution if in fact this project causes us to lose 100,000's of thousands 

of dollars on the future sale of this house. 

The dollars that would make all the difference to our future and that of our children. 

The quality of all our lives will be severely impacted if this 

closure project takes place so close to our residence. I fell that

the

people of Folsom have had no warning and little knowledge of what your

agency's are about to do. I know the majority of the public would be outraged and against

to Folsom Point closure. Please find a dirrent plan and place for your construction 

staging area.

Connie Freese-916-985-3315.Dear Mr. Oliver,

 I am writting this email to go on your Official Record that our

entire family of seven is completely opposed to the closing of Folsom Point for may 

reasons. We built our first custom house on 107 Jumper Ct in Briggs ranch 16 years ago. 

Our family grew to 4 children plus a grandparent and we needed to build a second custom 
2

house. This was based on the complete joy of living so close to the beautiful Folsom Pt 

rec. area and boat launch. 

 This second house is at 106 McDerby Ct. which is very close to the Folsom pt entrance. 

We constructed a 6 bedroom 5 1/2

bath custom home that literally was builtby tremendous sweat equity

and

much financial burden but we considered it all worth while because it would be a future 

asset to us as our children grew, went to college , married ,and we retired. Our 

childrens ages are 16,15,13,and 11. All girls. My husband and I are 53 and 51. As you 

can see our huge expenses are quickly coming upon us and our major asset is our beautiful 

custom house that was to be our safety net as means of paying for these financial burdens 

of the

future. 

We have actively used this facility for 16 years and the thought that we could not launch 

our boat or go for a walk there is unbeliviable,. If this facility is closed and used for 

a staging area for construction, Our family will be directly impacted. My mother is 85, 

who lives with us and she

suffers from weaked lung condition which causes he to cough quite a bit now. 

 With the added air pollution to our location I am very concerned to what this will do 

to her breathing problems. I also have 2 daughters with

asthma like conditions that will be inflamed with the dust and carbon

emmisions. I am very concerned with the increased noise levels that will occur. We have 

a pool and I feel that will limit our use of it greatly. My biggest complaint though is 

what this 6-7 year closure will do to my property value that we worked so hard on all 

these years.

I have been told that there is something called eminent domain that could allow us to sue 

the gov. for restitution if in fact this project causes us to lose 100,000's of thousands 

of dollars on the future sale of this house. 

The dollars that would make all the difference to our future and that of our children. 

The quality of all our lives will be severely impacted if this 

closure project takes place so close to our residence. I fell that

the

people of Folsom have had no warning and little knowledge of what your

agency's are about to do. I know the majority of the public would be outraged and against

to Folsom Point closure. Please find a diifferent plan and place for your construction 

staging area.

Connie Freese-916-985-3315.
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Mike Finnegan [MFINNEGAN@mp.usbr.gov]

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 1:30 PM

To: Shawn Oliver

Subject: Fwd: Don't close Folsom Point

>>> "Santos, Carmella" <carmella_santos@addisonavenue.com> 01/22 1:25

PM >>>

Opposed to the closing of Folsom Point. I wanted this on record, my opposition.

Carmella Santos

"The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential and may be legally 

privileged and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If

you are not an intended recipient or if you have received this message in error, you are 

hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this e-mail is strictly 

prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by 

return e-mail or telephone if the sender's phone number is listed above, then promptly 

and permanently delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration."
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Mike Finnegan [MFINNEGAN@mp.usbr.gov]

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 1:18 PM

To: Shawn Oliver

Subject: Fwd: Objection to Folsom Point Closure

>>> Carrie Cota <thecotafamily@sbcglobal.net> 01/22 1:15 PM >>>

To whom it may concern;

 

 I completely object to the proposed closure of Folsom Point State Recreation Area. This

proposition is unacceptable to me and to the citizens of Folsom and our surrounding 

communities. Folsom Point is used by many thousands of community members throughout the 

year for outdoor recreation (walking, biking, running, boating and picnicking) and 

sometimes just contemplation. The closure would be an outrage and detrimentally impact 

the quality of life for those in Folsom. Since the Dam Road closed, it has been the only 

access to Folsom Lake within the City of Folsom and has been a serious draw for visitors 

as well.

 

 Please choose an alternative solution, as closing Folsom Point is absolutely 

unacceptable. Thank you for your considering another alternative solution.

 

 Carrie, Folsom Resident

 
Porter, Stacy

From: Apeterson1974@aol.com

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 8:31 PM

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: (no subject)

Page 1 of 1

1/23/2007

I strongly object to the proposed closure of Folsom Point State Recreation 

Area! This proposition is unacceptable to the citizens of Folsom and 

surrounding communities. Folsom Point is used by thousands of community 

members throughout the year for picnics, walking, biking, running and 

boating. Its closure would be an outrage. 

Folsom Point is the only access to Folsom Lake in the City of Folsom. 

Please consider alternative solutions, as closing Folsom Point is absolutely 

unacceptable. 

Sincerely, 

Aimee Peterson 
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Mike Finnegan [MFINNEGAN@mp.usbr.gov]

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 1:11 PM

To: Shawn Oliver

Subject: Fwd: Closure of Folsom Point

>>> <jodyann11@comcast.net> 01/22 1:02 PM >>>

To whom it may concern;

I strenuously object to the proposed closure of Folsom Point State Recreation Area. This 

proposition seems unnecessary and unreasonable due to many other alternatives. My family 

and I have been residents of Folsom for 16 years. We moved to Folsom to be near Folsom 

Lake. Folsom Point is the only boat launch we have ever used and it is used by many 

thousands of community members throughout the year for outdoor recreation such as walking,

biking, running, boating and picnicking.

Since the Folsom Dam Road closed, Folsom Point has been the only access to Folsom Lake 

within the city of Folsom and has been a serious draw for visitors as well. The closure of

Folsom Dam Road was extremely inconvenient for Folsom residents and devastating to many 

Folsom businesses. Closing Folsom Point would be an outrage and detrimentally impact the 

quality of life for Folsom residents as well as cripple many businesses. This would 

severely affect the economy in Folsom and adversely change the entire dyn amics of the 

city. If there is work to be done or repairs needed, there are other alternatives to 

closing Folsom Point. There would be less of an impact to businesses and residents if the 

work was done during evening hours in the summer and full days in the winter when the 

weather is cold and there is less desire to use Folsom Point.

Please choose an alternative solution, as closing Folsom Point is absolutely unacceptable 

to all residents of Folsom. 

Thank you for your consideration.

Jody Biaggi

(916) 608-2201
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Mike Finnegan [MFINNEGAN@mp.usbr.gov]

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 12:41 PM

To: Shawn Oliver

Subject: Fwd: I strongly oppose the closing of Folsom Point

>>> "Bob Grunsky" <Bob.Grunsky@KSBenefits.com> 01/22 12:36 PM >>>

To: whom it may concern

I have been a Folsom resident for nearly 17years. One of the primary reasons I moved here 

was because of the recreational activities provided by Folsom Lake. Access to the lake at 

Folsom Point was a huge factor in where I chose to purchase my home. I oppose the closing 

of this facility and would hope that you would hear the voice of the "recreation 

community" and if at all possible, select another location for your project.

Thank you,

Bob Grunsky

Kelley & Swain, Inc.

Direct - (916) 932-2807

Toll Free - (800) 466-2250 X307

Fax - (916) 984-7801

This email/fax and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may contain some 

personally identifiable health information, the use of which is prohibited by Federal law.

This transmission was intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it 

was addressed.

 Any other use of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 

correspondence in error, please notify the system manager and delete the file immediately.

Thank you for your anticipated attention to this matter.
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Mike Finnegan [MFINNEGAN@mp.usbr.gov]

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 12:40 PM

To: Shawn Oliver

Subject: Fwd: Folsom Point

>>> Michele Flores <mflores916@comcast.net> 01/22 12:27 PM >>>

To whom it may concern:

In regards to the proposed closing of Folsom Point, I want to express my strong opposition

to the plan. Please consider an alternate site to be used for the staging area during the

dam construction.

Thank you,

Michele Flores

585 Borges Ct

Folsom, CA 95630

Sandra J. Gallardo PTA Treasurer

Folsom Youth Football & Cheer Secretary
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Mike Finnegan [MFINNEGAN@mp.usbr.gov]

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 12:40 PM

To: Shawn Oliver

Subject: Fwd: Folsom Point

>>> Christina Flores <christinarflores@yahoo.com> 01/22 12:06 PM >>>

To whom it may concern:

 

 In regard to the proposed closing of Folsom Point, I want to express my opposition to 

the plan. Please consider an alternate site to be used for the staging area during the 

dam construction.

 

 Thank you,

 Christina Flores

 441 Amhurst Circle

 Folsom, CA 95630

---------------------------------

 Get your own web address.

 Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Mike Finnegan [MFINNEGAN@mp.usbr.gov]

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 12:40 PM

To: Shawn Oliver

Subject: Fwd: RE: Folsom Point

>>> Franco Salluce <salluce@yahoo.com> 01/22 11:32 AM >>>

Misters Oliver and Finnegan,

I am writing to ask that alternatives to closing the Folsom Point State Recreation Area be

considered during the upcoming construction project at the Folsom Dam. I am an Elk Grove, 

CA resident and drive nearly an hour several times a year to enjoy the closest 

recreational lake to me and my family.

If an outright alternative is not viable please consider all the users of this site and 

restrict access only as necessary. Perhaps a compromise would allow public use during 

lulls in the project and/or peaks of recreational use.

Surely, the success of the Folsom Dam project lies not only in its completion, but also in

the Bureau's consideration for the community.

Thank you for your time,

Franco Salluce

____________________________________________________________________________________

It's here! Your new message! 

Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.

http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
1

Porter, Stacy

From: Mike Finnegan [MFINNEGAN@mp.usbr.gov]

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 12:39 PM

To: Shawn Oliver

Subject: Fwd: Folsom Point Closing "NO"

>>> <Kevin.Z.Long@kp.org> 01/22 10:44 AM >>>

Closing Folsom Point ? "Please No!

The reason we selected the house we live in (Briggs Ranch development) was to be near the 

Lake and the entrance to the Lake. Currently we are in the process of moving across the 

street (Natomas) to a new development to be even closer (LA Collina Del Lago) and this 

was never even noted that they may be closing access to the Lake.

Folsom Point is the only access we have in the City of Folsom and during the summer on 

many weekends Folsom Point is filled to capacity. If something needs to be closed it 

should be an area that has multiple points of access.

Please Do Not Close Folsom Point!

Kevin Long and Family Jill, Spencer and Hayden

916-985-2649

Current Address

104 Skidmore Court

Folsom Ca 95630

Future Address

768 Lorena Lane

Folsom Ca 95630

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are 

prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or

disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 

sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments 

without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you.
Porter, Stacy

From: Judynapa1@aol.com

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 11:57 AM

To: Soliver@mp.usbr.gov

Subject: Closing Folsom Point recreation area

Page 1 of 1

1/23/2007

There must be other places that can serve as a staging area for the repair work scheduled on 

the dam. I am a senior citizen and some of the entry points, to the lake, are gravel pathways 

which are slippery for me. This is a wonderful spot for me to walk, exercise my dogs and bring

my family. Please don't destroy the quality of life this area brings to so many people by 

closing it off to the public.

 

Thank you, 

 

Judy Henderson

3245 Appian Way

El Dorado Hills, Ca.   95762

(916) 941-6681