alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(77 South. 943)

#### CAIN v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM.

(6 Div. 364.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Feb. 5, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; William E. Fort, Judge.

Rebecca Cain was tried on a charge of violating section 2 of an ordinance of the City of Birmingham, and appeals from the judgment of conviction.

Affirmed.

M. M. Ullman', of Birmingham, for appellee.

SAMFORD, J.

There is no hill of exceptions in the transcript. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
§ 1960.17 Alternate standards. An agency head may apply an alternate standard where deemed necessary, and shall, after consultation with employees or their representatives, including appropriate occupational safety and health committees, notify the Secretary and request approval of such alternate standards. ( a ) Any request by the head of the agency for an alternate standard shall be transmitted to the Secretary.
( b ) Any such request for an alternate standard shall not be approved by the Secretary unless it provides equivalent or greater protection for affected employees. Any such request shall include: ( 1 ) A statement of why the agency cannot comply with the OSHA standard or wants to adopt an alternate standard;
( 2 ) A description of the alternate standard;
( 3 ) An explanation of how the alternate standard provides equivalent or greater protection for the affected employees;
( 4 ) A description of interim protective measures afforded employees until a decision is rendered by the Secretary of Labor; and
( 5 ) A summary of written comments, if any, from interested employees, employee representatives, and occupational safety and health committees.
#### *Wirts *vs.*Norton and others.

A plaintiff will not be permitted to retain a default entered for not pleading, where the only fault on the part of the defendant is the service of a copy of the affidavit of merits, instead of the original; the plaintiff is required in such case to apprise the defendant of the defect.

Motion to set aside a default for not pleading. The defendants served a plea and a *copy*of the affidavit of merits, required by the practice of the court, instead of the *original*affidavit. The plaintiff treated the plea as a nullity, and entered the defendants’ default as for the want of a plea. The chief justice set aside the default as irregularly entered, holding, that the plea should have been returned and the defect stated.

Motion granted.
#### § 452.14 Newly formed or merged labor organizations.

The initial selection of officers by newly formed or merged labor organizations is not subject to the requirements of title IV.[15] Such labor organizations may have temporary or provisional officers serve until a regular election subject to the Act can be scheduled. An election under all the safeguards prescribed in these regulations must be held within a reasonable period after the organization begins to function. What would be a reasonable time for this purpose depends on the circumstances, but after the formation or consolidation of the labor organization, a regular election subject to title IV may not be deferred longer than the statutory period provided for that type of organization. However, when a pre-existing labor organization changes its affiliation without substantially altering its basic structure or identity the terms of its officers may not be extended beyond the maximum period specified by the Act for the type of labor organization involved.

###### Footnotes -
  452.14

[15] However, the other provisions of the Act are applicable immediately upon such formation or merger.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Cooperatives in Postwar Europe: Survey of Developments in Scandinavian Countries and Eastern, Central, and Western Europe

              																	Parker, Florence E. (Florence Evelyn). 						*Cooperatives in Postwar Europe: Survey of Developments in Scandinavian Countries and Eastern, Central, and Western Europe : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 942*,												Washington, D.C.: 								United States Government Printing Office, 										1948,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4509,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### STATE v REDD

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21963.

Decided March 5, 1930

*176Kinkade, Robinson, Jones, Matthias and Day, JJ, concur.
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Gaerlan, Joan" <JGaerlan@ci.glendale.ca.us>

Date: 7/22/2010 9:54 AM

Subject: Re: Request for Extension of EPA Questionnaire for Plant ID 02827

Attachments: pic08250.gif; 070710 Request for Extension EPA Questionnaire.pdf

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension request for the steam electric effluent

guidelines questionnaire for the Glendale Water and Power (GWP) Grayson

Station. Your request for extension has been denied. The deadline for

your plant to submit Version 4 of the completed questionnaire remains 90

days after receipt.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric

questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at

steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic08250.gif)

 

 From: "Gaerlan, Joan" <JGaerlan@ci.glendale.ca.us> 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: "Cruz, Nicolas" <NCruz@ci.glendale.ca.us> 

 Date: 07/07/2010 05:49 PM 

 Subject: Request for Extension of EPA Questionnaire for Plant ID 02827

Dear Ms. Alicea,

On behalf of City of Glendale Water and Power, please find the attached

pdf file as our request for extension of EPA questionnaire for Grayson

Power Plant (Plant ID 02827). A hard copy of this letter has been sent

to your attention via snail mail today. If you have any questions or

concerns, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Nick Cruz at

818.548.3399.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Joan Antonette V. Gaerlan
Mechanical Engineering Assistant

Glendale Water & Power - Power Management

Tel. 818.548.2828

Fax. 818.548.3377

JGaerlan@ci.glendale.ca.us

 (See attached file: 070710 Request for Extension EPA Questionnaire.pdf)
iu-ra3140endorsement.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing










	
	Voya Insurance and Annuity Company 
	ENDORSEMENT




 




	
	The Contract, Policy and/or Certificate is hereby endorsed effective September 1, 2014, as follows: 
	
	The name of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company has been changed to Voya Insurance and Annuity 
	Company. Accordingly, all references to ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company or ING in the Contract, Policy 
	and/or Certificate are changed to Voya Insurance and Annuity Company and Voya, respectively. 
	The address remains as follows: 
	
	909 Locust Street 
	Des Moines, Iowa 50309 
	
	All other terms, conditions and provisions of your Contract, Policy and/or Certificate remain unchanged. 




 



 




	
	IU-RA-3140
#### Vicki Oppenheim, Appellant, v United Charities of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[698 NYS2d 144]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered May 24, 1999, dismissing the complaint and third-party complaint, and bringing up for review a prior order, same court and Justice, entered on or about December 18, 1998, which, in an action for personal injuries allegedly caused by defendants’ negligent maintenance of premises, granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court properly precluded plaintiffs expert from testifying with respect to Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Syndrome, without a hearing, on the ground that plaintiff failed to adduce evidence sufficient to raise an issue of fact as to whether such a diagnosis has gained general acceptance in the scientific community after defendants had made a prima facie showing that it has not *(see, Frank v State of New York,*972 F Supp 130 [ND NY]; *Collins v Welch,*178 Misc 2d 107). There being no proof of other injuries caused by defendants’ alleged negligence, the complaint was properly dismissed. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Tom, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

§ 4.165 Wage payments and fringe benefits—in general. ( a ) ( 1 ) Monetary wages specified under the Act shall be paid to the employees to whom they are due promptly and in no event later than one pay period following the end of the pay period in which they are earned. No deduction, rebate, or refund is permitted, except as hereinafter stated. The same rules apply to cash payments authorized to be paid with the statutory monetary wages as equivalents of determined fringe benefits (see § 4.177).
( 2 ) The Act makes no distinction, with respect to its compensation provisions, between temporary, part-time, and full-time employees, and the wage and fringe benefit determinations apply, in the absence of an express limitation, equally to all such service employees engaged in work subject to the Act's provisions. (See § 4.176 regarding fringe benefit payments to temporary and part-time employees.)
( b ) The Act does not prescribe the length of the pay period. However, for purposes of administration of the Act, and to conform with practices required under other statutes that may be applicable to the employment, wages and hours worked must be calculated on the basis of a fixed and regularly recurring workweek of seven consecutive 24-hour workday periods, and the records must be kept on this basis. It is appropriate to use this workweek for the pay period. A bi-weekly or semimonthly, pay period may, however, be used if advance notification is given to the affected employees. A pay period longer than semimonthly is not recognized as appropriate for service employees and wage payments at greater intervals will not be considered as constituting proper payments in compliance with the Act.
( c ) The prevailing rate established by a wage determination under the Act is a minimum rate. A contractor is not precluded from paying wage rates in excess of those determined to be prevailing in the particular locality. Nor does the Act affect or require the changing of any provisions of union contracts specifying higher monetary wages or fringe benefits than those contained in an applicable determination. However, if an applicable wage determination contains a wage or fringe benefit provision for a class of service employees which is higher than that specified in an existing union agreement, the determination's provision must be observed for any work performed on a contract subject to that determination.
Exhibit 32      Section 1350
Certifications.

---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of First Capital Bank Holding Corporation (the
Company), each certify that, to his knowledge on the date of this
certification:

|1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2005 as
          filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | By:    /s/ Michael G. Sanchez    
         Michael G. Sanchez         Chief
Executive Officer         May 13, 2005
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | By:    /s/ Timothy S. Ayers    
          Timothy S. Ayers          Chief Financial Officer
          May 13, 2005
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Elizabeth El-Taher, Respondent, v Memorial Hospital for Cancer and Allied Diseases, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 470]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered February 6, 1999, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A triable issue of fact exists as to whether defendant had constructive notice of the puddle of water in defendant’s cafeteria that allegedly caused plaintiff to slip and fall, where the documentary and testimonial evidence demonstrates that this condition may have been observed as much as a half hour prior to the occurrence *(see, Rose v Da Ecib USA,*259 AD2d 258). Concur — Tom, J. P., Andrias, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.
#### § 452.113 Sectional balloting.

The ballots may be prepared so that the names of candidates for positions representative of a particular area appear only on the ballots received by members living in that area.
#### BANTELL, A Minor, etc., v. CLARK

Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist., Hamilton Co.

No. 3594.

Decided March 10, 1930

Maty Ashton Bantell and I. L. Huddle, both of Cincinnati, for Bantell.

M. Froome Barbour, Cincinnati, for Clark.'

ROSS, J.

Two assignments of error are urged: (1) That the demurrer to the amended petition to vacate should have been sustained. (2) That the court, in violation of the provisions of 11637 GC. failed to preserve the lien of Bantell secured by his judgment by default, by vacating instead of modifying or suspending the former judgment.

On the first assignment of error, the demurrer was properly overruled, the petition having stated a cause of action under the *452provision of 11631 GC.

As to the second assignment of error: The judgment setting aside the default judgment in so far as it attempted to vacate the lien of Bantell was void. The effect of the original judgment in securing the lien to the extent of any final judgment and costs is still preserved. Under 11634 GC., the Court w,as powerless to vacate this lien. While the language of the judgment amounted to a vacation, the effect which the statute provides is a suspension and the lien is still preserved.

The judgment is affirmed.

CUSHING, P. J., and HAMILTON, J., concur.
[No. 28087-6-II.

Division Two.

November 22, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Thomas E. Ludvigsen, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grays Harbor County, No. 00-1-00537-0, David E. Foscue, J., entered October 22, 2001. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, A.C.J., concurred in by Houghton and Armstrong, JJ.
§ 403.8 Dissemination and verification of reports. ( a ) Every labor organization required to submit a report under section 201(b) of the Act and under this part shall make available to all its members the information required to be contained in such reports, and every such labor organization and its officers shall be under a duty to permit such member for just cause to examine any books, records, and accounts necessary to verify such report.
( b ) ( 1 ) If a labor organization is required to file a report under this part using the Form LM-2 and indicates that it has failed or refused to disclose information required by the Form concerning any disbursement, or receipt not otherwise reported on Statement B, to an individual or entity in the amount of $5,000 or more, or any two or more disbursements, or receipts not otherwise reported on Statement B, to an individual or entity that, in the aggregate, amount to $5,000 or more, because disclosure of such information may be adverse to the organization's legitimate interests, then the failure or refusal to disclose the information shall be deemed “just cause” for purposes of paragraph (a) of this section.
( 2 ) Disclosure may be adverse to a labor organization's legitimate interests under this paragraph if disclosure would reveal confidential information concerning the organization's organizing or negotiating strategy or individuals paid by the labor organization to work in a non-union facility in order to assist the labor organization in organizing employees, provided that such individuals are not employees of the labor organization who receive more than $10,000 in the aggregate in the reporting year from the union.
( c ) In all other cases, a union member has the burden of establishing “just cause” for purposes of paragraph (a) of this section.
[28 FR 14383, Dec. 27, 1963, as amended at 68 FR 58447, Oct. 9, 2003; 71 FR 57737, Sept. 29, 2006; 73 FR 57449, Oct. 2, 2008; 75 FR 74959, Dec. 1, 2010; 85 FR 13442, Mar. 6, 2020; 86 FR 74371, Dec. 30, 2021]
ex10_11.htm


Exhibit 10.11


 



PROMISSORY NOTE







April 2, 2014


 


To: Sean Sego – Independent Director NAS







From: Robert Chance







Re: Promissory Note payable – Related Party Debt












I, Sean P Sego, agree to loan National Automation Services, Inc. (NAS) the sum of $50,000 according to the following terms and conditions:








	
  

	
1.)

	
$50,000 as set forth herein, on April 2, 2014 for a period of one (1) year, and to pay interest on the unpaid principal balance hereof at the rate of ten percent (10%) (the “Interest Rate”) per annum from the date hereof (the “Issue Date”) until the same becomes due and payable, whether at maturity or upon acceleration or by prepayment or otherwise. 








	
  

	
2.)

	
Equity Security in the amount of 4,000,000 shares of restricted stock to be issued at a value of $0.0125 or $50,000.


















 


 




	      /s/ Sean Sego	 
	
Sean P Sego


Note Holder

	 








 


 




	      /s/ Robert Chance	 
	

Robert Chance


President/Chief Executive Officer


National Automation Services, Inc.
#### § 402.8 Personal responsibility of signatories of reports.

Each individual required to sign any report under section 201(a) of the Act and under this part shall be personally responsible for the filing of such report and for any statement contained therein which he knows to be false.
§ 4203.5 PBGC action on requests. ( a ) *General.* The PBGC shall approve a plan amendment providing for the application of special complete or partial withdrawal liability rules upon a determination by the PBGC that the plan amendment— ( 1 ) Will apply only to an industry that has characteristics that would make use of the special withdrawal rules appropriate; and
( 2 ) Will not pose a significant risk to the insurance system.
( b ) *Notice of pendency of request.* As soon as practicable after receiving a request for approval of a plan amendment containing all the information required under § 4203.4, the PBGC shall publish a notice of the pendency of the request in the Federal Register. The notice shall contain a summary of the request and invite interested persons to submit written comments to the PBGC concerning the request. The notice will normally provide for a comment period of 45 days.
( c ) *PBGC decision on request.* After the close of the comment period, PBGC shall issue its decision in writing on the request for approval of a plan amendment. Notice of the decision shall be published in the Federal Register.
(THE BANK OF NEW YORK, NA)
                           National Community Division






                                                                   July 15, 1996




LCS Industries, Inc.
120 Brighton Road
Clifton, NJ 07012-1694

Attn:            Pat R. Frustaci
                 Vice President-Finance

Dear Pat:

                 The Bank of New  York  National  Association  (the  "Bank")  is
pleased  to  confirm  that it  holds  available  to LCS  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company") a $3,000,000 unsecured line of credit.

                 Advances under this line of credit shall be evidenced by, shall
be payable as provided in, and shall bear  interest at the rate  specified in, a
promissory note of the Company in the form included with this letter.

                 All obligations of the Company to the Bank with respect to this
line of credit shall be  guaranteed,  jointly and  severally,  by Spec Holdings,
Inc.,  The  SpeciaLISTS,  Ltd.,  Computer  Marketing  Systems,  inc. and Catalog
Resources, Inc. (collectively,  the "Guarantors") pursuant to a guarantee in the
form included with this letter.

                 For so long as this  line of credit  is held  available  to the
Company  or the  Company  has any  obligations  outstanding  under  this line of
credit,  (i) neither the Company nor any of its Guarantors shall create,  incur,
assume or suffer to exist any pledge,  lien, charge or other encumbrance upon or
with respect to any of the accounts  receivable of the Company and/or any of the
Guarantors and (ii) the Company shall deliver to the Bank,  within 15 days after
the end of each calendar month, an aging schedule of the accounts  receivable of
the Company which is satisfactory to the Bank in the form and content.

                 As you  know  lines of  credit  are  cancelable  at any time by
either party, and any advance under this line of credit is subject to the Bank's
satisfaction,  at the time of such advance,  with the condition  (financial  and
otherwise),  business,  prospects and  operations of the Company and each of the
Guarantors.
<PAGE>
Unless  cancelled  earlier as provide din the first sentence of this  paragraph,
this line of credit shall be held available until March 31, 1997.  Additionally,
all  advances  under  this line of credit  will have to be reduced to zero for a
period of thirty consecutive days during the period ending December 31, 1996.



                                          Very truly yours,

                                          THE BANK OF NEW YORK (NJ)




                                          By: /s/Brian J. Clark
                                              -----------------
                                                 Brian J. Clark
                                       Title:    Vice President
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-24-00155-CV

In the Interest of K.G., a Child

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2022-FAM-60986-5

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. No costs are assessed due to 

appellant’s inability to pay costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 22, 2024