alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
** **

 

**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Crdentia Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), I, James D. Durham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18,Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to my knowledge:

1.                 theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                 theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the datesand for the periods indicated.

This Certificationhas not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.
| Date:   August 14, 2006 | By:    | /s/ James D. Durham                  |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                              |   | James D. Durham                      |
|                              |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
§ 44.2 Election cycle and tenure of representatives. ( a ) *Election cycle.* The States located within each Federal region, as defined in this paragraph, shall elect one representative in accordance with the procedures specified in this part. The initial election for representatives of the States from all 10 Federal regions will be held not later than February 17, 1999. For purposes of this section, the Federal regions shall be the Standard Federal regions identified in former OMB Circular A-105 (issued April 4, 1974). This former Circular is available through the Office of the Commissioner of Labor Statistics, telephone number (202) 691-7808. For the representatives elected from the Federal regions II, IV, VII, VIII, and X, the initial term shall terminate on January 1, 2000. Subsequent elections for representatives from such regions shall be held in the last quarter of 1999 and thereafter biennially within the last calendar quarter of the year. For the representatives from the Federal regions I, III, V, VI, and IX, the initial term shall terminate on January 1, 2001. Subsequent elections for representatives from such regions shall be held within the last calendar quarter of 2000 and thereafter, biennially within the last calendar quarter of the year. After the initial election, the terms of all representatives shall terminate on January 1 of the third calendar year after the preceding scheduled election.
( b ) *Tenure.* The terms of the representatives elected in the first election shall commence upon election. The terms of representatives elected in subsequent elections shall commence January 1 of the year following the scheduled election. Representatives may serve for an unlimited number of terms.
AVS

Quality Management

System

Title: Domestic Change Worksheet

QPM#

AIR-ANM-030-F4

Date: December 17, 2008

Revision

1

Record of Contacts

.;to I0-0"45'

FDMS Docket No. FAA4lI& -

------

••• ,,,.... ,,. "."s".. •••

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA., ALPA, etc.)?

Orga"niZation Per'sd,n ~ontai::ted

,

, Date

Boeing Aircraft Company Sadayoshi Takar1a August 18, 2009

Mark Lopez Airplane Transphrt Association (ATA) August 20, 2009

1

1 DO NOT DELETE PAGE BREAK

I

•.• ••• " ,,.Z """'" ""_&""""ZI""""_""""".".'" "•.•""""""-"""------""

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check the Master Lislto Verify That This is thle Correct Revision Before Use

I
#### CUMBUS, etc. v DRENBERG CORPORATION, etc., et al.

Case No. 86-1338-CA

Fourth Judicial Circuit, Clay County

October 17, 1986

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Deborah A. Schroth, staff attorney, Jacksonville Area Legal Aid, Inc., for plaintiff.

Roger Harvey, pro se.

Seigfred W. Fagerberg as resident agent for Drenberg Corporation.

OPINION OF THE COURT

ELLIS T. FERNANDEZ, JR., Circuit Judge.

*ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION*

This cause came on to be heard before me, one of the Judges of the above-styled Court, upon Plaintiff’s Verified Motion for Temporary *73Injunction. After hearing argument of Plaintiffs counsel and otherwise being fully advised in the premises, the Court hereby finds:

1. That Plaintiff has a clear legal right to possession and the peaceful and quiet enjoyment of the mobile home which she rented form Defendants pursuant to an oral agreement.

2. That Defendants have unlawfully attempted to dispossess Plaintiff and her family, including her three minor children, by terminating the electricity to her home on or about September 19, 1986, and by refusing to restore electrical service at all times subsequent thereto.

3. That there is no adequate remedy at law that restore Plaintiff to the peaceful and quiet enjoyment and possession of her rental mobile home.

4. That if the Court does not enter this Order Granting Motion for Temporary Injunction, the Plaintiff will suffer immediate and irreparable injury similar to that which she has already suffered.

5. That the Plaintiff is indigent and unable to post bond for the entry of the Temporary Injunction.

6. That Plaintiffs attorney attempted to notify Defendants by telephone of the hearing on this Motion, but was unable to do so, as the telephone numbers of both Defendants are unpublished.

THEREFORE, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED;

1. That Plaintiffs Motion for Temporary Injunction be and the same is hereby granted.

2. That Defendants are hereby ordered to restore Plaintiff to the peaceful and quiet enjoyment of the rental mobile home located at Unit # 14, Lake Geneva Park, Lake Geneva, Clay County, Florida.

3. That Defendants are hereby ordered to immediately restore electrical service to the premises of the Plaintiff described above.

4. That Defendants are hereby enjoined from unlawfully removing, attempting to remove, or threatening to remove Plaintiff from the above-described premises.

5. That Defendants are hereby enjoined from unlawfully terminating electrical services to the above-described premises.

6. That Plaintiff shall post bond in the amount of *none*for the entry of this Temporary Injunction.

7. The Sheriffs of the State of Florida, their deputies, and the police officers of any municipalities therein are hereby authorized to use *74whatever force and whatever means necessary under the circumstances to effect compliance with this Temporary Injunction.

8. This Temporary Injunction shall remain in effect until further order of the Court.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida, this 17th day of October, 1986, at 9:30 a.m.
Opinion issued January 13 , 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 23
- 00011
- CV

——————————— IN RE NANCY CARMEN CURNEL & RONALD CURNEL , Relat or s

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDU M OPINION
Relators , Nancy Carmen Curnel and Ronald Curnel, have filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s December 14, 2022 oral denial of relators’ motion for sanctions seeking default judgment and to strike pleadings. 1 In conjunction with the petition, relators have filed a motion requ est ing an emergency

1 The underlying case is Nancy Carmen Curnel and Ronald Curnel v. Houston Methodist Hospital

- Willowbrook, et al., cause number 2016

- 36453 , pending in the 55th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Latosha Lewis Payne presiding.2

stay of the underlying trial court proceedings. We deny the mandamus petition and dismiss the stay motion as moot. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Hightower

.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 16, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 16, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19A2274. ORLANDO INGRAM et al. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE 

INSURANCE COMPANY.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
Exhibit 10.20


 





 


October 1, 2014


 


Matt Hanson


Managing Director


Sierra Global, LLC


Hunkins Waterfront Plaza, Suite 556


Main Street, Charlestown


St. Kitts and Nevis


 


Dear Sir:


 


Please be advised that Exhibit A (“Software Modules License
Fees”) attached to the Software License and Services Agreement between us dated November 23, 2013 is hereby amended as follows:


 


	2014 Update Software Fee	US$500,000.00


 


If our understanding of this amendment is correct, please indicate
by signing in the space provided below.


 


	MyEcheck, Inc.	Sierra Global, LLC
	By:  Ed Starrs	By:  Matt Hanson
	 	 
	/S/ Edward R. Starrs	/s/ Matt Hanson
	Its:  CEO	Its:  Managing Director
	Dated:  October 1, 2014	Dated:  October 1, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                              50,355
<SECURITIES>                                         1,387
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    54,534
<PP&E>                                              32,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                      28,681
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      62,646
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               11,327
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                33
<OTHER-SE>                                          11,125
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        62,646
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     2,572
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     8,720
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     626
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (6,284)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (6,284)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (6,284)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.10)





</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                  LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                   STATE OF       PERCENT OF
                    NAME                                       SEGMENT           INCORPORATION     OWNERSHIP
                    ----                                       -------           -------------    ----------
<S>                                                      <C>                     <C>              <C>
Colony Printing & Labeling, Inc. ..................      Glassware & Candles        Indiana          100%
Dee Zee, Inc. .....................................          Automotive              Ohio            100%
E. O. Brody Company ...............................      Glassware & Candles         Ohio            100%
Fostoria Glass, LLC ...............................      Glassware & Candles         Ohio            100%
Indiana Glass Company .............................      Glassware & Candles        Indiana          100%
Jackson Plastics Operations, Inc. .................          Automotive              Ohio            100%
Koneta, Inc. ......................................          Automotive              Ohio            100%
LaGrange Molded Products, Inc. ....................          Automotive            Delaware          100%
Lancaster Colony Commercial Products, Inc. ........      Glassware & Candles         Ohio            100%
Lancaster Glass Corporation .......................      Glassware & Candles         Ohio            100%
New York Frozen Foods, Inc. .......................        Specialty Foods           Ohio            100%
Pretty Products, Inc. .............................          Automotive              Ohio            100%
Sister Schubert's Homemade Rolls, Inc. ............        Specialty Foods          Alabama          100%
T. Marzetti Company ...............................        Specialty Foods           Ohio            100%
The Quality Bakery Company, Inc. ..................        Specialty Foods           Ohio            100%
Reames Foods, Inc. ................................        Specialty Foods           Iowa            100%
Waycross Molded Products, Inc. ....................          Automotive              Ohio            100%
</TABLE>

All subsidiaries conduct their business under the names shown.
§ 451.5 “State or local central body.” ( a ) The definition of “labor organization” in section 3(i) and the examples of labor organizations deemed to be engaged in an industry affecting commerce in section 3(j)(5) both except from the term “labor organization” a “State or local central body.” As used in these two sections, the phrase *State or local central body* means an organization that: ( 1 ) Is chartered by a federation of national or international unions; and
( 2 ) Admits to membership local unions and subordinate bodies of national or international unions that are affiliated with the chartering federation within the State or local central body's territory and any local unions or subordinate bodies directly affiliated with the federation in such territory; and
( 3 ) Exists primarily to carry on educational, legislative and coordinating activities.
( b ) The term does not include organizations of local unions or subordinate bodies ( 1 ) of a single national or international union; or
( 2 ) of a particular department of a federation or similar association of national or international unions.
[29 FR 8060, June 25, 1964]
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate recor d, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argumentwould not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. Se eFed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered sub mitted without oral argument. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### AUG 18 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
KEVIN WALTER LORD, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, vs. RON CHAMPION, Respondent - Appellee. No. 98-6090 (D.C. No. 96-CV-45-L) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before PORFILIO , KELLY , and HENRY , Circuit Judges. ** Mr. Lord, a state prisoner appearing pro se, seeks to appeal from the magistrate’s report and recommendation denying habe as relief, 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Our review of the record indicates Mr. Lord did notfile objections to the magistrate’s report and recommendations. According ly, Mr. Lord has waived appellate review, and our review of the record disc loses no reason why the waiver- 2 -

should not operate to bar review of Mr. Lord’s clai ms. See Talley v. Hesse , 91 F.3d 1411, 1413 (10th Cir. 1996). We DENY Mr. Lord ’s application for a certificate of probable cause and DISMISS the appea l. Entered for the Court
Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Foundation announces the following meeting.

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Physics (1208.                    

*Date and Time:*                         July 10-12, 2000 from 8 am to 5 pm.                    

*Place:*                         Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso (LNGS) I-67010 Asergi (L'Aquila) Italy.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Bradley D. Keister, Program Director for Nuclear Physics, Room 1015N, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, VA 22230. (703) 306-1891.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning the development and construction of the Borexino Solar neutrino detector.                    

*Agenda:*                         To hear presentations and write recommendations concerning the development and construction of the Borexino Solar neutrino detector.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary of confidential nature, including technical information; information on personnel and proprietary data for present and future subcontracts. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: May 12, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-12459  Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital   Trust  VI  and  Merrill   Lynch   Preferred   Funding  VI,  L.P.  (the
"Partnership")  for the  period  ended  March 26,  2004 as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John J.
Fosina,  Controller of Merrill  Lynch & Co.,  Inc.,  the General  Partner of the
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING VI, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ JOHN J. FOSINA
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    John J. Fosina *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: May 6, 2004
__________________

*  John J. Fosina functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
§ 2700.66 Summary disposition of proceedings. ( a ) *Generally.* When a party fails to comply with an order of a Judge or these rules, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, an order to show cause shall be directed to the party before the entry of any order of default or dismissal. The order shall be mailed by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested.
( b ) *Failure to attend hearing.* If a party fails to attend a scheduled hearing, the Judge, where appropriate, may find the party in default or dismiss the proceeding without issuing an order to show cause.
( c ) *Penalty proceedings.* When the Judge finds a party in default in a civil penalty proceeding, the Judge shall also enter an order assessing appropriate penalties and directing that such penalties be paid.