NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

Wntttb ~tates ([ourt of §ppeaIs 

for tbe jf eberaI ([treutt 

TECHNOLOGY PATENTS LLC, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

T-MOBILE (UK) LTD., T-MOBILE AUSTRIA GMBH, 

T-MOBILE CZECH REPUBLIC A.S., T-MOBILE 

DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, T-MOBILE HUNGARY CO. 

LTD., T-MOBILE NETHERLANDS B.V., AND TMOBILE SLOVENSKO A.S., 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND 

ADVANCED INFO SERVICE PLC, ALSO KNOWN 

AS AlS, BELL MOBILITY INC., CSL NEW WORLD 

MOBILITY LIMITED, CHINA MOBILE PEOPLES 

TELEPHONE COMPANY LIMITED, NOW KNOWN 

AS CHINA MOBILE HONG KONG COMPANY 

LIMITED, KT FREETEL CO. LTD., NOW KNOWN 

AS KT CORPORATION, SINGAPORE TELECOM 

MOBILE PRIVATE LIMITED, SINGAPORE 

TELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED, ALSO KNOWN 

AS SINGTEL, SINGTEL OPTUS PTY LIMITED, 

STARHUB MOBILE PTE LTD., AND TELSTRA 

CORPORATION LIMITED, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND 
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 2 

AMERICA MOVIL, SAR DE C.V., CLARO, SA, 

AMX ARGENTINA, S.A., AND RADIOMOVIL DIPSA, 

S.A. DE C.V., ALSO KNOWN AS TELCEL, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND 

BELGACOM MOBILE S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS 

PROXIMUS, MOBILKOM AUSTRIA AG, SFR, ALSO 

KNOWN AS SOCIETE FRANCAISE DE 

RADIOTELEPHONE SA, SMARTONE MOBILE 

COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED, TANGO SA, 

VODAFONE CZECH REPUBLIC A.S., VODAFONE 

D2 GMBH, ALSO KNOWN AS VODAFONE 

GERMANY, VODAFONE ESPANA S.A., VODAFONE 

ESSAR LTD., VODAFONE HUNGARY MOBILE 

TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD., VODAFONE 

IRELAND LTD., VODAFONE LIBERTEL B.V., 

VODAFONE LIMITED, ALSO KNOWN AS 

VODAFONE UK, VODAFONE NETWORK PTY. 

LTD., VODAFONE NEW ZEALAND, VODAFONE 

OMNITEL N.V., VODAFONE PORTUGAL, 

COMUNICACOES PESSOAIS, SA, VODAFONE 

TELEKOMUNIKASYON A.S., ALSO KNOWN AS 

VODAFONE TURKEY, AND VODAFONE-PANAFON 

HELLENIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY 

SA, ALSO KNOWN AS VODAFONE-PANAFON S.A., 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND 

TNL PCS S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS 01, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

BASE N.V.lS.A., E-PLUS MOBILFUNK GMBH & CO. 

KG, AND KPN B.V., 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND 
3 TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 

BERMUDA DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS LTD_, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

BOUYGUES TELECOM S.A., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

CHUNGHWA TELECOM CO. LTD., 

FAR EASTONE TELCOMMUNICATIONS CO. LTD., 

AND TAIWAN MOBILE CO., LTD., 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND 

CLICKATELL (PTY) LTD., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

FRANCE TELECOM ESPANA S.A., ALSO·KNOWN 

AS ORANGE SPAIN, FRANCE TELECOM S.A., 

MOBISTAR N.V .• ORANGE AUSTRIA 

TELECOMMUNICATION GMBH, FORMERLY 

KNOWN AS ONE GMBH, ORANGE 

COMMUNICATIONS S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS 

ORANGE SWITZERLAND, ORANGE FRANCE S.A., 

ORANGE PLC, ALSO KNOWN AS ORANGE U.K.. 

ORANGE S.A., ORANGE SLOVENSKO A.S., AND 

VOX MOBILE S.A., 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND 

H3G S.P.A., ALSO KNOWN AS 3 ITALIA, 

HUTCHISON 3G AUSTRIA GMBH, HUTCHISON 3G 

UK LIMITED, AND HUTCHISON 

TELECOMMUNICATIONS (HONG KONG) 

LIMITED, 

Defendants-Appellees, 
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBlLE 

AND 

KDDI CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

PCCW MOBILE HK LIMITED, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

YAHOO! INC., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

KABUSHIKI KAISHA NTT DOCOMO AND 

SOFTBANK MOBILE CORP., 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND 

M3 WIRELESS LTD., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

NETCOM AS, NOW KNOWN AS TELIASONERA 

NORGE AS AND TELIA DANMARK AlS, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

4 

AND 

TMN-TELECOMUNICACOES MOVEIS NACIONAIS, 

S.A., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

02 (GERMANY) GMBH & CO. OHG, 02 (UK) 

LIMITED, 02 COMMUNICATIONS (IRELAND) 

LTD., PEGASO PCS, S.A. DE C.V., TELEFONICA 

MOVILES ARGENTINA, S.A., TELEFONICA 

MOVILES ESPANA, S.A.U., TELEFONICA MOVILES 

MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V., TELEFONICA 02 CZECH 
5 TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 

REPUBLIC, A.S., TELEFONICA 02 EUROPE PLC, 

ALSO KNOWN AS 02 PLC, TELEFONICA, S.A., 

VIVO PARTICIPACOES, S.A., AND VIVO, S.A., 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND 

PANNON GSM TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD., 

SONOFON AlS, SWISSCOM MOBILE A.G., TDC AlS, 

TDC SWITZERLAND AG, ALSO KNOWN AS 

SUNRISE, TELENOR MOBIL A.S., AND TOTAL 

ACCESS COMMUNICATION PLC, ALSO KNOWN 

ASDTAC, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND 

SONAECOM-SERVICOS DE COMUNICACOES, S.A., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

TELECOM ITALIA S.PA., TELECOM PERSONAL 

S.A., TIM CELULAR S.A., AND TIM 

PARTICIPACOES S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS TIM 

BRAZIL, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND 

TRUE MOVE COMPANY LIMITED, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

WIND HELLAS TELECOMMUNICATIONS S.A. AND 

WIND TELECOMUNICAZIONI SPA, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND 

A VEA ILETISIM HIZMETLERI A.S., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 

T-MOBILE USA, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

TELE-MOBILE COMPANY, ALSO KNOWN AS 

TELUS MOBILITY, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

ROGERS WIRELESS PARTNERSHIP, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

PALM, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, DOING BUSINESS AS 

VERIZON WIRELESS, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

6 

HELlO, LLC AND SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND 

LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 
7 TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 

MOTOROLA, INC., NOW KNOWN AS MOTOROLA 

SOLUTIONS, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG, MOBILE ONE LTD., 

ORANGE LIMITED, ORANGE NEDERLAND N.V., 

TURK CELL ILETISIM HIZMETLERI A.S., AND 

UPSIDE WIRELESS INC., ALSO KNOWN AS IPIPI, 

Defendants, 

AND 

MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., 

Intervenor. 

2011-1581 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Maryland in case no. 07-CV-3012, Judge Alexander Williams, Jr. 

TECHNOLOGY PATENTS LLC, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

T-MOBILE (UK) LTD., T-MOBILE AUSTRIA GMBH, 

T-MOBILE CZECH REPUBLIC A.S., T-MOBILE 

DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, T-MOBILE HUNGARY CO. 

LTD., T-MOBILE NETHERLANDS B.V., AND TMOBILE SLOVENSKO A.S., 

Defendants, 
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 

AND 

ADVANCED INFO SERVICE PLC, ALSO KNOWN 

AS AIS, BELL MOBILITY INC., CSL NEW WORLD 

MOBILITY LIMITED, CHINA MOBILE PEOPLES 

TELEPHONE COMPANY LIMITED, NOW KNOWN 

8 

AS CHINA MOBILE HONG KONG COMPANY 

LIMITED, KT FREETEL CO. LTD., NOW KNOWN 

AS KT CORPORATION, SINGAPORE TELECOM 

MOBILE PRIVATE LIMITED, SINGAPORE 

TELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED, ALSO KNOWN 

AS SINGTEL, SINGTEL OPTUS PTY LIMITED, 

STARHUB MOBILE PTE LTD., AND TELSTRA 

CORPORATION LIMITED, 

Defendants, 

AND 

AMERICA MOVIL, S.A.B. DE C.V., CLARO, S.A., 

AMX ARGENTINA, S.A., AND RADIOMOVIL DIPSA, 

S.A. DE C.V., ALSO KNOWN AS TELCEL, 

Defendants, 

AND 

BELGACOM MOBILE S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS 

PROXIMUS, MOBILKOM AUSTRIA AG, SFR, ALSO 

KNOWN AS SOCIETE FRANCAISE DE 

RADIOTELEPHONE S.A., SMARTONE MOBILE 

COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED, TANGO S.A., 

VODAFONE CZECH REPUBLIC A.S., VODAFONE 

D2 GMBH, ALSO KNOWN AS VODAFONE 

GERMANY, VODAFONE ESPANA S.A., VODAFONE 

ESSAR LTD., VODAFONE HUNGARY MOBILE 

TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD., VODAFONE 

IRELAND LTD., VODAFONE LIBERTEL B.V., 

VODAFONE LIMITED, ALSO KNOWN AS 

VODAFONE UK, VODAFONE NETWORK PTY. 

LTD., VODAFONE NEW ZEALAND, VODAFONE 

OMNITEL N.V., VODAFONE PORTUGAL, 
9 TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 

COMUNICACOES PESSOAIS, S.A., VODAFONE 

TELEKOMUNIKASYON A.S., ALSO KNOWN AS 

VODAFONE TURKEY, AND VODAFONE-PANAFON 

HELLENIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY 

S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS VODAFONE-PANAFON S.A., 

Defendants, 

AND 

TNL PCS S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS 01, 

Defendant, 

AND 

BASE N.V.lS.A., E-PLUS MOBILFUNK GMBH & CO. 

KG, AND KPN B.V., 

Defendants, 

AND 

BERMUDA DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS LTD., 

Defendant, 

AND 

BOUYGUES TELECOM S.A., 

Defendant, 

AND 

CHUNGHWATELECOM CO. LTD., 

FAR EASTONE TELCOMMUNICATIONS CO. LTD., 

AND TAIWAN MOBILE CO., LTD., 

Defendants, 

AND 

CLICKATELL (PTY) LTD., 

Defendant, 

AND 

FRANCE TELECOM ESPANA S.A., ALSO KNOWN 

AS ORANGE SPAIN, FRANCE TELECOM S.A., 

MOBISTAR N.V., ORANGE AUSTRIA 
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 10 

TELECOMMUNICATION GMBH, FORMERLY 

KNOWN AS ONE GMBH, ORANGE 

COMMUNICATIONS S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS 

ORANGE SWITZERLAND, ORANGE FRANCE S.A., 

ORANGE PLC, ALSO KNOWN AS ORANGE U.K., 

ORANGE S.A., ORANGE SLOVENSKO A.S., AND 

VOX MOBILE S.A., 

Defendants, 

AND 

H3G S.P.A., ALSO KNOWN AS 3ITALIA, 

HUTCHISON 3G AUSTRIA GMBH, HUTCHISON 3G 

UK LIMITED, AND HUTCHISON 

TELECOMMUNICATIONS (HONG KONG) 

LIMITED, 

Defendants, 

AND 

KDDI CORPORATION, 

Defendant, 

AND 

PCCW MOBILE HK LIMITED, 

Defendant, 

AND 

YAHOO! INC., 

Defendant, 

AND 

KABUSHIKI KAISHA NTT DOCOMO AND 

SOFTBANK MOBILE CORP., 

Defendants, 

AND 

M3 WIRELESS LTD., 

Defendant, 
11 TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBlLE 

AND 

NETCOM AS, NOW KNOWN AS TELIASONERA 

NORGE AS AND TELIA DANMARK AlS, 

Defendants, 

AND 

TMN-TELECOMUNICACOES MOVEIS NACIONAIS, 

S.A., 

Defendant, 

AND 

02 (GERMANY) GMBH & CO. OHG, 02 (UK) 

LIMITED, 02 COMMUNICATIONS (IRELAND) 

LTD., PEGASO PCS, S.A. DE C.V., TELEFONICA 

MOVILES ARGENTINA, S.A., TELEFONICA 

MOVILES ESPANA, S.A.U., TELEFONICA MOVILES 

MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V., TELEFONICA 02 CZECH 

REPUBLIC, A.S., TELEFONICA 02 EURQPE PLC, 

ALSO KNOWN AS 02 PLC, TELEFONICA, S.A., 

VIVO PARTICIPACOES, S.A., AND VIVO, S.A., 

Defendants, 

AND 

PANNON GSM TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD., 

SONOFON AlS, SWISSCOM MOBILE A.G., TDC AlS, 

TDC SWITZERLAND AG, ALSO KNOWN AS 

SUNRISE, TELENOR MOBIL A.S., AND TOTAL 

ACCESS COMMUNICATION PLC, ALSO KNOWN 

ASDTAC, 

Defendants, 

AND 

SONAECOM-SERVICOS DE COMUNICACOES, S.A., 

Defendant, 

AND 
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBlLE 12 

TELECOM ITALIA S.PA., TELECOM PERSONAL 

S.A., TIM CELULAR S.A., AND TIM 

PARTICIPACOES S.A., ALSO KNOWN AS TIM 

BRAZIL, 

Defendants, 

AND 

TRUE MOVE COMPANY LIMITED, 

Defendant, 

AND 

WIND HELLAS TELECOMMUNICATIONS S.A. AND 

WIND TELECOMUNICAZIONI SPA, 

Defendants, 

AND 

A VEA ILETISIM HIZMETLERI A.S., 

Defendant, 

AND 

T-MOBILE USA, INC., 

Defendant-Appellant, 

AND 

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

AND 

TELE-MOBILE COMPANY, ALSO KNOWN AS 

TELUS MOBILITY, 

Defendant, 

AND 

ROGERS WIRELESS PARTNERSHIP, 

Defendant, 

AND 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellant, 
13 TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 

AND 

PALM,INC., 

Defendant-Appellant, 

AND 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, DOING BUSINESS AS 

VERIZON WIRELESS, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

AND 

HELlO, LLC AND SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, 

Defendants-Appellants, 

AND 

LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC., 

Defendant-Appellant, 

AND 

MOTOROLA, INC., NOW KNOWN AS MOtOROLA 

SOLUTIONS, INC., 

Defendant-Appellant, 

AND 

IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED, 

Defendant, 

AND 

DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG, MOBILEONE LTD., 

ORANGE LIMITED, ORANGE NEDERLAND N.V., 

TURK CELL ILETISIM HIZMETLERI A.S., AND 

UPSIDE WIRELESS INC., ALSO KNOWN AS IPIPI, 

Defendants, 

AND 

MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., 

Intervenor. 
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 14 

2011-1612, -1613 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

District of Maryland in case no. 07-CV-3012, Judge Alexander Williams, Jr. 

ON MOTION 

ORDER 

The Defendants-Cross Appellants move to voluntarily 

dismiss Cross-Appeal Nos. 2011-1612 and 2011-1613 and 

to conform the briefing schedule to the dismissal of the 

cross appeals. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT Is ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion to dismiss cross appeal nos. 2011-1612 

and 2011-1613 is granted. 2011-1612 and 2011-1613 are 

dismissed. The revised official caption for 2011-1581 is 

reflected above. 

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2011-1612 

and 2011-1613. 

(3) The motion to conform the briefing schedule is 

granted to the extent that the appellees' principal briefs 

are due on February 24, 2012 and the appellant's reply 

brief is due on March 30,2012. 

JAN 202012 

Date 

FOR THE COURT 

/s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

FILED 

u.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR 

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

JAN 202012 

JAN HORBAlY 

CLERK 
15 TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 

cc: Bryant C. Boren, Jr., Esq. 

Doris Johnson Hines, Esq. 

Sharon A. Israel, Esq. 

Matthew J. Moore, Esq. 

Ian N. Feinberg, Esq. 

Roderick R. McKelvie, Esq. 

Louis M. Solomon, Esq. 

Kevin P. Anderson, Esq. 

Brian Wm. Higgins, Esq. 

Stefani E. Shanberg, Esq. 

Stuart J. Sinder, Esq. 

James W. Dabney, Esq. 

Stephen B. Kinnaird, Esq. 

Brian M. Koide, Esq. 

William H. Burgess, Esq. 

Deanne E. Maynard, Esq. 

Michael J. McKeon, Esq. 

Robert C. Bertin, Esq. 

George F. Pappas, Esq. 

Jonathan E. Retsky, Esq. 

Stephen S. Madsen, Esq. 

Kevin Walsh, Esq. 

Russell E. Levine, Esq. 

Michael M. Markman, Esq. 

Robert C. Nissen, Esq. 

Edward Han, Esq. 

Brian C. Riopelle, Esq. 

Ramsey M. AI-Salam, Esq. 

Abbe F. Fletman, Esq. 

David L. Leichtman, Esq. 

Andrew R. Sommer, Esq. 

Joseph A. Rhoa, Esq. 

Maximilian A. Grant, Esq. 

Jay F. Utley, Esq. 

Adam Gahtan, Esq. 

Adam R. Alper, Esq. 

Scott R. Matthews, Esq. 
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS v. T-MOBILE 

s21 

Steven Jay Young, Esq. 

Victor Siber, Esq. 

16 

Issued As A Mandate (as to 2011-1612, -1613 only): JAN 20 2012