alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 36.230 Transition plans. ( a ) *Submission of plans.* An institution to which § 36.225 applies and that is composed of more than one administratively separate unit may submit either a single transition plan applicable to all such units, or a separate transition plan applicable to each such unit.
( b ) *Content of plans.* In order to be approved by the Secretary of Education, a transition plan shall: ( 1 ) State the name, address, and Federal Interagency Committee on Education Code of the educational institution submitting such plan, the administratively separate units to which the plan is applicable, and the name, address, and telephone number of the person to whom questions concerning the plan may be addressed. The person who submits the plan shall be the chief administrator or president of the institution, or another individual legally authorized to bind the institution to all actions set forth in the plan.
( 2 ) State whether the educational institution or administratively separate unit admits students of both sexes as regular students and, if so, when it began to do so.
( 3 ) Identify and describe with respect to the educational institution or administratively separate unit any obstacles to admitting students without discrimination on the basis of sex.
( 4 ) Describe in detail the steps necessary to eliminate as soon as practicable each obstacle so identified and indicate the schedule for taking these steps and the individual directly responsible for their implementation.
( 5 ) Include estimates of the number of students, by sex, expected to apply for, be admitted to, and enter each class during the period covered by the plan.
( c ) *Nondiscrimination.* No policy or practice of a recipient to which § 36.225 applies shall result in treatment of applicants to or students of such recipient in violation of §§ 36.300 through 36.310 unless such treatment is necessitated by an obstacle identified in paragraph (b)(3) of this section and a schedule for eliminating that obstacle has been provided as required by paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
( d ) *Effects of past exclusion.* To overcome the effects of past exclusion of students on the basis of sex, each educational institution to which § 36.225 applies shall include in its transition plan, and shall implement, specific steps designed to encourage individuals of the previously excluded sex to apply for admission to such institution. Such steps shall include instituting recruitment programs that emphasize the institution's commitment to enrolling students of the sex previously excluded.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12895]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Determining the Carcinogenic Significance of Heterocyclic 
Amines.
    Date: June 12-14, 2000.
    Time: 7 pm to 11 am.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Wyndham Garden Hotel--Pleasanton, 5990 Stoneridge Mall 
Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588.
    Contact Person: Michael B Small, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Grants Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of 
Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8040, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
301/402-0996.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction, 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 16, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-12895 Filed 5-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Rosa M. Clarkson, Adm’x, *Appellant,*v. Belle Walton Burdette, *Appellee.*

This case as decided by Division A.

Appealed from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

*John E.*and *Julian Eartridge,*for Appellants;

*Baker é Baker,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam

This cause coining on for final hearing upon transcripts of the record and briefs of the respective parties, and having been duly considered by Division A, and no reversible error being made to appear, it is, there fore, considered and ordered that the decree appealed from be and is hereby affirmed at the cost of the appellants.
#### § 2704.303 Reply.

Within 15 days after service of an answer, the applicant may file a reply. If the reply is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, the applicant shall include with the reply either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 2704.306 of this part.
#### § 1911.3 Petition for the promulgation, modification, or revocation of a standard.

Any interested person may file with the Assistant Secretary, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, D.C. 20210, a written petition for the promulgation, modification, or revocation of a standard. The petition should include, or be accompanied by, the proposed rule desired and a statement of the reasons therefor and intended effect thereof.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.1

                                    a21, Inc
                            One Embarcadero Center,
                            Suite 500 San Francisco,
                                California 94111
                                 (415) 284-2121

                             CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of a21, Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB/A for the period  ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Haim Ariav, President
of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Haim Ariav
-------------------------------
Haim Ariav, President
(Principal Executive Officer)




                                       16

<PAGE>
§ 2570.50 Revocation or modification of exemptions. ( a ) If, after an exemption takes effect, material changes in facts, circumstances, or representations occur, including whether a qualified independent fiduciary resigns, is terminated, or is convicted of a crime, the Department, at its sole discretion, may take steps to revoke or modify the exemption. If the qualified independent fiduciary resigns, is terminated, or is convicted of a crime, the applicant must notify the Department within 30 days of the resignation, termination, or conviction, and the Department reserves the right to request the applicant to provide the Department with any of the information required pursuant to § 2570.34(e) and (f) pursuant to a time determined by the Department at its sole discretion.
( b ) Before revoking or modifying an exemption, the Department will publish a notice of its proposed action in the Federal Register and provide interested persons with an opportunity to comment on the proposed revocation or modification. Before the Department publishes such notice, it will notify the applicant of the Department's proposed action and the reasons therefore. After the publication of the notice, the applicant will have the opportunity to comment on the proposed revocation or modification.
( c ) The revocation or modification of an exemption will have prospective effect only.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Jacob Gross, as Executor of Sarah Snopek, Appellant; Nathan Snopek, Respondent. Seymour Mork, as Special Guardian for Infants, Appellant.

Submitted October 1, 1937;

decided October 19, 1937.

*607
      *Nat. C. Helman*for Jacob Gross, as executor, appellant.

*Seymour Mork,*as special guardian, appellant.

*Paul Abrams*and *Oscar Levine*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs payable out of the estate. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Housing and Community Development Act of 1992

              														Housing and Community Development Act of 1992, October 28, 1992.						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1106,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### HIALEAH HOUSING AUTHORITY v RODRIGUEZ

Case No. 87-3199 CC 21

County Court, Dade County

September 29, 1987

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Francis E. Holden, Jr., Holden & Holden, P.A., for plaintiff. Jonathan Thiele, Legal Services of Greater Miami, Inc., for defendant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

CALVIN MAPP, County Judge.

This case was before me on September 25, 1987 at 9:00 a.m. upon Defendant’s motion to determine the amount of rent to be deposited in the Court’s registry and upon Plaintiff’s motion for default and final judgment of removal of tenant. After hearing testimony of both parties, considering the documentary evidence offered by both parties, and hearing arguments of counsel for both parties, the Court finds and decides as follows:

> *51. Pursuant to Section 83.60(2), Florida Statutes, an action for eviction of a residential tenant, if the tenant interposes any defense other than payment, the tenant must pay into the registry of the court the accrued rent either as alleged in the complaint or as determined by the Court. The amount of rent due here is in dispute. Defendant has presented affirmative defenses and demanded a jury trial on the factual issues involving the rent. This Court must apply Section 83.60(2), Florida Statutes, consistent with Defendant’s right of access to the courts guaranteed by the Florida Constitution, Article 2, Section 21, according to the decision in *Ash v. Dade County,*18 Fla. Supp.2d 185 (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. 1986).

> 2. Defendant’s motion to determine the amount of rent for deposit into the registry during the pendency of this action is granted.

> 3. Defendant had paid and Plaintiff had received the amount of $87.00 rent for the several months prior to the filing of this action.

> 4. Defendant has deposited $174.00 into the registry to date, including $87.00 for August rent and $87.00 for September rent.

> 5. Although Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that rent is due in the amount of $2,252.00, it alleges that rent in the sum of $87.00 is next due on October 1, 1987 and monthly thereafter.

> 6. Defendant shall continue to pay the amount of $87.00 each month into the Court’s registry while this action remains pending.

> 7. Plaintiff’s motion for default and final judgment of removal of tenant because of the Defendant’s failure to deposit $2,252.00, the amount allegedly due in retroactive rent for 12 months, is denied.

DONE and ORDERED in Hialeah, Dade County, Florida, this 29th day of September, 1987.
Exhibit 99

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned  executive  officers of the Registrant  hereby certify that this
Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q for the  quarter  ended  March  31,  2003  (the
"Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  and the  information  contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.


                                   By: /s/  James C. McGill
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Name:  James C. McGill
                                       Title: President and Chief
                                                Executive Officer



                                   By: /s/  A. Christine Baker
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Name:   A. Christine Baker
                                       Title:  Secretary, Treasurer and
                                               Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 14, 2003
### Water-quality characteristics of New Jersey streams

By: Peter W. AndersonJohn R. George

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1819G

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Handwerk v. Bortz

*Walker & Walker,*for plaintiffs.

*Snyder, Wert, Wilcox, Frederick &*Doll, for defendant.

September 9, 1958.

Henninger, P. J.,

In this action in trespass, in which liability was disputed, plaintiff won a sealed verdict for $500 marked “for pain and suffering,” although the parties had stipulated that the automobile repairs amounted to $200, a hospital bill of $81.90 and a doctor bill of $65 were undisputed and no allowance was made for loss of wages.

*257Plaintiff has moved to amend the verdict to include these items, but since this was a sealed verdict, we have no right to mold it after dispersal of the jury to include items not mentioned in the sealed verdict: Reed v. Kinnik, 389 Pa. 143, 150; Havranek v. Pittsburgh, 344 Pa. 375, 379; Eastley v. Glenn, 313 Pa. 130, 134.

Nor may we grant plaintiff’s motion for judgment n. o. v. Plaintiff cites in support of this motion the cases of Schwarz v. Bank of Pittsburgh National Association, 28 Pa. 200, and Stierheim v. Bechtold, 158 Pa. Superior Ct. 107, in which the court granted judgment n. o. v. for the amount due where the jury had awarded a lesser amount.

Both of these cases, however, were actions in assumpsit and in both cases the respective courts stressed the point that judgment could be entered for the correct amount despite a verdict in a lower amount only when the court in the first instance should have entered a directed verdict in the first place upon a point for binding instructions for plaintiff.

Since a directed verdict could not have been entered in this case, we cannot enter judgment n. o. v. for plaintiff for a higher amount than the verdict although the means are within our power to determine what the verdict should have been. Nor can we be certain that the jury would have granted plaintiff all the wages claimed to have been lost.

We do, however, have the power to grant a new trial upon a motion for judgment n. o. v. (Granato v. Wise, 94 Pa. Superior Ct. 346; Smith v. Graham, 101 Pa. Superior Ct. 604), and we have recently done so in Conway v. The Home Life Insurance Company of America, no. 146, January term, 1957.

The jury has certainly decided the issue of fact concerning liability in plaintiff’s favor by making an *258award for pain and suffering. A device recently promulgated by our Supreme Court (Van Buren v. Eberhard, 377 Pa. 22, 34; Hanus v. K. M. B. Construction Company, 392 Pa. 307, 309) and adopted by us in Snyder v. Seheirer, no. 193, April term, 1952, permits the granting of a new trial for the sole purpose of determining the damages to which a party is entitled.

We intend to use that device most sparingly but we are of the opinion that this is another case in which it would be expedient.

Now, September 9, 1958, the verdict rendered in above captioned action is set aside to the extent that the amount of the verdict is concerned and a new trial is awarded solely to determine the amount of damages to which plaintiff is entitled.
# EUR-Lex - 32000D0180 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000D0180

**2000/180/EC: Commission Decision of 23 February 2000 extending the possible time period for provisional authorisations of the new active substance Pseudomonas chlororaphis (notified under document number C(2000) 407) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 057 , 02/03/2000 P. 0034 - 0034 *

COMMISSION DECISION

of 23 February 2000

extending the possible time period for provisional authorisations of the new active substance Pseudomonas chlororaphis

(notified under document number C(2000) 407)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2000/180/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant-protection products on the market(1), as last amended by Commission Directive 1999/80/EC(2), and in particular Article 8(1) fourth subparagraph thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Directive 91/414/EEC (hereinafter referred to as "the Directive") provided for the development of a Community list of active substances authorised for incorporation in plant-protection products.

(2) Bio Agri submitted a dossier for the new active substance Pseudomonas chlororaphis to Sweden on 15 December 1994 with a view of obtaining the inclusion of the active substance in Annex I to the Directive.

(3) For Pseudomonas chlororaphis, the effects on human health and the environment are being assessed, in accordance with the provisions of Article 6(2) and (4) of the Directive, for the uses proposed by the applicant. Sweden acting as nominated rapporteur Member State, submitted the assessment report concerned to the Commission on 7 April 1998.

(4) The submitted report is being reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the framework of the Standing Committee on Plant Health and in Working Groups thereof.

(5) For Pseudomonas chlororaphis additional time is required to enable a full examination of the scientific and technical dossier.

(6) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plant Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Member States may extend provisional authorisations already granted for plant-protection products containing Pseudomonas chlororaphis for a period not exceeding 24 months from the date of this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 February 2000.

For the Commission

David BYRNE

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 210, 10.8.1999, p. 13.
§ 1917.47 Winches. ( a ) Moving winch parts which present caught-in hazards to employees shall be guarded.
( b ) Winches shall have clearly identifiable and readily accessible stop controls.
( c ) Portable winches shall be secured against accidental shifting while in use.
( d ) Portable winches shall be fitted with limit switches if employees have access to areas from which it is possible to be drawn into the winch.
( e ) The provisions of § 1917.45(f)(11) shall apply to winches.