alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      David V. Singer                   |   | /s/      Rick D. Puckett                                                             |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| David      V. Singer                       |   | Rick      D. Puckett                                                                 |
| President      and Chief Executive Officer |   | Executive      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and      Secretary |
| February      22, 2010                     |   | February      22, 2010                                                               |
(77 South. 1003)

#### FLORIDA NURSERY & TRADING CO. v. WATSON.

(4 Div. 513.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 15, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Covington County; A. B. Foster, Judge.

A. Whaley, of Andalusia, for appellant. J. D. Bailey, of Florala, for appellee.

FER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded in accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court (201 Ala. 97, 77 South. 391). See, also, ante, p. 159, 75 South. 875.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Virginia One Development, INC, Avery Park Partners, 

LLC d/b/a A very Park, DSH Diplomat, LLC d/b/a 

Diplomat Townhomes, Colony Creek, LLC, and 

Crossings Townhomes, LLC, 

Complainants/ Appellant 

v. 

The City of Atlanta, Georgia, 

Respondent 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

FAA Docket 16-12-09 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CF~ Part 16, subpart B. 

the date by which the Final Agency Decision will be issued in this matter is hereby extended 

to on or about September 14, 2015. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case. 

Ed1kAi,P uardo A Angele; 

Associate Administrator 

for Airports 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

/ 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on ( 7 Jutvf 201.~ I caused to be placed in the United 

States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe Notice of Extension ofTime, 

addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant 

Steven M. Taber 

Taber Law Group, P.C. 

1 League, #60036 

Irvine, CA 92602-0036 

staber@taber law .com 

Counsel for Respondent 

Eric N. Heyer 

THOMPSON HINE LLP 

1919 M Street N.W., Suite 700 

Washington, DC 20036 

Eric.Heyer@thompsonhine.com 

John L. Watkins 

Roy E. Hadley, Jr. 

THOMPSON HINE LLP 

Two Alliance Center 

3560 Lenox Road, Suite 1600 

Atlanta, GA 30326-2905 

John. Watkins@thompsonhine.com 

Roy.Hadley@thompsonhine.com 

Hand Delivered to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, A CO-l 00 

FAA Eastern Region, AEA -600 

Claudia Roberts 

Airport Compliance and Management 

Analysis
§ 4007.3 Filing requirement; method of filing. ( a ) *In general.* The estimation, determination, declaration, and payment of premiums must be made in accordance with the premium instructions on PBGC's Web site (*www.pbgc.gov*). Subject to the provisions of § 4007.13, the plan administrator of each covered plan is responsible for filing prescribed premium information and payments. Each required premium payment and related information, certified as provided in the premium instructions, must be filed by the applicable due date specified in this part in the manner and format prescribed in the instructions.
( b ) *Electronic filing.* Information must be filed electronically except to the extent that PBGC grants an exemption for good cause in appropriate circumstances. (The requirement to file electronically applies to all estimated and final flat-rate and variable-rate premium filings (including amended filings) but does not apply to information filed to comply with a PBGC request under (4007.10(c) (dealing with providing record information in connection with a premium compliance review).) Unless an exemption applies, filing on paper or in any other manner other than by a prescribed electronic filing method does not satisfy the requirement to file. Failure to file electronically as required is subject to penalty under ERISA section 4071.
[71 FR 31081, June 1, 2006, as amended at 72 FR 71229, Dec. 17, 2007; 73 FR 15076, Mar. 21, 2008; 79 FR 13561, Mar. 11, 2014]
----

----

I Teave

Nõukogu

----

Teatis kvootide avamisest nõukogu otsuse.... alusel, millega muudetakse nõukogu 15. detsembri 2003. aasta otsust teatavate terasetoodete kaubavahetuse kohta Euroopa Ühenduse ja Ukraina vahel

(2004/C 167/01)

----

(1)ELT L 227, 26.6.2004.

(2)ELT C 150, 5.6.2004, lk 1.

----

Komisjon

----

Euro vahetuskurss (1)

25. juuni 2004

(2004/C 167/02)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Allikas: EKP avaldatud viitekurss.

----
#### § 403.3 Form of annual financial report—detailed report.

Every labor organization shall, except as expressly provided otherwise in this part, file an annual financial report as required by [§ 403.2](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-403.2), prepared on United States Department of Labor Form LM-2, “Labor Organization Annual Report,” in the detail required by the instructions accompanying the form and constituting a part thereof.

Note:

Form LM-2 was revised at [58 FR 67594](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/58-FR-67594), December 21, 1993.

[[28 FR 14383](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/28-FR-14383), Dec. 27, 1963, as amended at [62 FR 6092](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/62-FR-6092), Feb. 10, 1997]
#### § 38.32 Small recipient Equal Opportunity Officer obligations.

Although small recipients, as defined in § 38.4(hhh), do not need to designate EO Officers who have the full range of responsibilities listed in § 38.31, they must designate an individual who will be responsible for adopting and publishing complaint procedures, and processing complaints, as explained in §§ 38.72 through 38.75.
#### § 1928.1027 Cadmium.

See § 1910.1027, *Cadmium.*

[61 FR 9255, Mar. 7, 1996]
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            -------------------------
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             -----------------------
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                             ----------------------
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crdentia Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the six month period ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, William S.
Leftwich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

         1.       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

         2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
                  indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


Date:  September 9, 2004                    By: /S/ WILLIAM S. LEFTWICH
                                                --------------------------
                                                   William S. Leftwich
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to delegation by the Commission,                     *see*37 FR 28,710 (Dec. 29, 1972), and the Commission's regulations,                     *see*10 CFR 2.1201, 2.1207, notice is hereby given that (1) a single member of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel is designated as Presiding Officer to rule on petitions for leave to intervene and/or requests for hearing; and (2) upon making the requisite findings in accordance with 10 CFR § 2.1205(h), the Presiding Officer will conduct an adjudicatory hearing in the following proceeding:                     Start Printed Page 3259

## Molycorp, Inc., Washington, Pennsylvania 

                    This proceeding, which will be conducted pursuant to 10 CFR Part 2, subpart L, of the Commission's Regulations, “Informal Hearing Procedures for Adjudications in Materials and Operator Licensing Proceedings,” concerns a request for hearing submitted by Canton Township, Pennsylvania. The request was filed in response to a notice of consideration by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff of a request by Molycorp, Inc., to amend its 10 CFR part 40 source material license to authorize decommissioning of its former processing facility in Washington, Pennsylvania. The notice of consideration of the application and opportunity for hearing was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     at 64 FR 62,227 (Nov. 16, 1999).                 

The Presiding Officer in this proceeding is Administrative Judge Charles Bechhoefer. Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.722, 2.1209, Administrative Judge Richard F. Cole has been appointed to assist the Presiding Officer in taking evidence and in preparing a suitable record for review. 

All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed with Judge Bechhoefer and Judge Cole in accordance with 10 CFR 2.1203. Their addresses are: 

Administrative Judge Charles Bechhoefer, Presiding Officer, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

Dr. Richard F. Cole, Special Assistant, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

This designation of presiding officer is issued pursuant to the authority of the Chief Administrative Judge of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.

Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day of January 2000.

G. Paul Bollwerk, III, 

Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.

[FR Doc. 00-1299 Filed 1-19-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Medicaid and Medicare /
              - 10.5 Medicaid—Change in Percent of Total Beneficiaries with Disabilities

## Table 10.5: Medicaid—Change in Percent[1] of Total Beneficiaries with Disabilities: Fiscal Year 2009 to Fiscal Year 2010

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
IIA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 11 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to clarify 

that the Constitution neither prohibits voluntary prayer nor requires 

prayer in schools. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2007 

Mr. BYRD (for himself, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. COCHRAN, 

Mrs. DOLE, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. LOTT, and Mr. ISAKSON) introduced the 

following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to clarify that the Constitution neither prohibits 

voluntary prayer nor requires prayer in schools. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


bajohnson on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•SJ 11 IS 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 by the Congress: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘Nothing in this Constitution, including any amend5 ment to this Constitution, shall be construed to prohibit 

6 voluntary prayer or require prayer in a public school, or 

7 to prohibit voluntary prayer or require prayer at a public 

8 school extracurricular activity.’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 19, 2007. 

Resolved, That the resolution from the Senate (S. Con. 

Res. 61) entitled ‘‘Concurrent resolution providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate, and a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives’’, do pass 

with the following 

AMENDMENTS: 

Ω1æPage 1, line 2, of the Senate engrossed amendment, 

strike ‘‘adjourns’’ and insert: recesses or adjourns 

Ω2æPage 1, beginning on line 6, of the Senate engrossed 

amendment, strike ‘‘or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution’’ and insert: 

or until such day and time as may be specified in the motion 

to recess or adjourn, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 

first’’ 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. Con. Res. 61 

AMENDMENTS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER11-4141-000]

                    On July 29, 2011, the New York Independent System Operator, Inc. (NYISO) filed a notification of its inability to timely complete price corrections, a request for a limited tariff waiver to permit ancillary service prices to be corrected with the corrected prices to be posted by the end of Monday, August 1, 2011, and a request for a shortened notice period and expedited Commission action. NYISO requests a shortened answer period to facilitate expedited Commission consideration. NYISO states that good cause exists for the Commission to act on an expedited basis because until the Commission acts on NYISO's waiver request, NYISO and market participants will not know if                           ( print page 48856)                        certain posted real-time ancillary service prices are correct and final.                

By this notice, the period for filing answers to NYISO's request for a tariff waiver is shortened to and including August 3, 2011.

Dated: July 29, 2011.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-20047 Filed 8-8-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 943 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 943

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the period for 
 which the designation of an area as an empowerment zone is in effect.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 20, 2007

Ms. Snowe (for herself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the period for 
 which the designation of an area as an empowerment zone is in effect.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ROUND II AND ROUND III EMPOWERMENT ZONES.

    (a) In General.--Clause (i) of section 1391(d)(1)(A) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to period for which designation 
is in effect) is amended by inserting ``(December 31, 2016, in the case 
of any empowerment zone designated under subsection (g) or (h))'' after 
``2009''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Paragraph (2) of section 1391(h) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to additional designations 
permitted) is amended by striking ``2009'' and inserting ``2016''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 215.2 General.

Upon receipt of copies of applications for Federal assistance subject to 49 U.S.C. 5333(b), together with a request for the certification of employee protective arrangements from the Department of Transportation, the Department of Labor will process those applications, which must be in final form. The Federal Transit Administration will provide the Department with the information necessary to enable the Department to certify the project.

[60 FR 62969, Dec. 7, 1995, as amended at 73 FR 47055, Aug. 13, 2008]
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1430 

CA 11-00731 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, GREEN, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF PMA MANAGEMENT CORP., 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

ROBERT WHITE AND HINMAN, HOWARD & KATTELL, LLP, 

RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

HINMAN, HOWARD & KATTELL, LLP, BINGHAMTON (PAUL T. SHEPPARD OF

COUNSEL), RESPONDENT-APPELLANT PRO SE, AND FOR ROBERT WHITE,

RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, SYRACUSE (J.P. WRIGHT OF COUNSEL), FOR

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County

(Donald A. Greenwood, J.), entered January 7, 2011. The order denied

the motion of respondents for leave to answer the petition, to

resettle and for reargument. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as

it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed (see Empire Ins.

Co. v Food City, 167 AD2d 983, 984) and insofar as it denied that part

of the motion seeking to resettle the order entered January 19, 2010

is dismissed (see Gifaldi v Dumont Co., 172 AD2d 1025, 1026) and the

order is affirmed without costs. 

Entered: December 30, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
# Daily ET rates @ ADRS 2006-2009

# ET terms and Equations
#### Commercial Bank of Buffalo *vs.*Love.

In separate suits against the maker and endorser of a note, the latter after plea pleaded cannot avail himself of a subsequent paymeht of the note by the maker, by interposing a plea puis darrein ; he can require the plaintiff to proceed to trial upon the plea originally put in, but upon his omission to do so, the plaintiff may discontinue without costs.

Leave to discontinue. The defendant was sued as the endorser of a promissory note. He pleaded in bar a judgment on the same note against the *maker,*the issuing of an execution, and a levy upon property to an amount sufficient to satisfy the plaintiffs. Subsequently the maker paid the debt, and thereupon the defendant pleaded such payment *puis darrein,*and entered the plaintiff’s default for not replying to such latter plea. The plaintiffs now moved to set aside the default and to strike out the plea *puis darrein.*

*By the Court,*

Bronson, J.

The plea *puis darrein*is inequitable and unjust, and must be stricken out. If the . defendant wishes to avail himself of any defence existing previous to the payment, he has a right to do so, and if he so elects, the plaintiffs must notice the cause for trial; otherwise they have leave to discontinue without costs.

Rule accordingly.