alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rampart Capital Corporation
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  period  ending  June 30, 2003 (the
"Report"),  as  filed  with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof,  each  of  I Charles W. Janke, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer  of  the  Company,  I James H. Carpenter, Chief Operating Officer of the
Company,  and  I  Charles  F.  Presley,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify  separately  and  independently,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Sec.  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     1.          The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of section
13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as amended; and

     2.          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

By:                                                              August 14, 2003
     ---------------------------------
     C.  W.  Janke
     Chairman  of  the  Board  and
     Chief  Executive  Officer
     (Principal  Executive  Officer)

By:                                                              August 14, 2003
     ---------------------------------
     J.  H.  Carpenter
     President  and
     Chief  Operating  Officer

By:                                                              August 14, 2003
     ---------------------------------
     Charles  F.  Presley
     Vice-President,
     Chief  Financial  Officer  and
     Treasurer
     (Principal  Financial  Officer)

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.


<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 93 (Friday, May 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12016]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-6607-2]


Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
EPA Comments

    Availability of EPA comments prepared April 24, 2000 through April 
28, 2000 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under 
section 309 of the Clean Air Act and section 102(2)(c) of the National 
Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA 
comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at (202) 
564-7167.
    An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental 
impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 14, 2000 (65 
FR 20157).

Draft EISs

    ERP No. D-BOP-K80041-CA Rating EC2, Lassen County Federal 
Correctional Institution (FCI), Construction and Operation, To House 
Median-Security Inmates and Federal Prison Camp, Possible Site is 
Southwest Site, Lassen County, CA.
    Summary: EPA expressed concern that potential air, water and waste 
impacts from prison industry were not fully disclosed. EPA requested 
that next document provide additional information on the above issues 
and building design.

Final EISs

    ERP No. F-AFS-J65297-MT Bull Lake Estates Road Access Project, 
Implementation, Easement Grant Permit, Kootenai National Forest, Three 
Rivers Rangers District, Lincoln County, MT.
    Summary: While EPA did not object to the statutorily mandated road 
access, it did express environmental concerns regarding potential 
secondary project impacts to water quality, fisheries, and wildlife.
    ERP No. F-TPT-K61147-CA Presidio of San Francisco General 
Management Plan, Implementation, New Development and Uses within the 
Letterman Complex, Golden Gate National Recreation Area, City and 
County of San Francisco, CA.
    Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.

    Dated: May 9, 2000.
Joseph C. Montgomery,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 00-12016 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
[Cite as Moore v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. , 2011-Ohio-1860.] 

# Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

PAUL JOSETH MOORE

Plaintiff

v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION

Defendant[Cite as Moore v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. , 2011-Ohio-1860.] Case No. 2009-09264

Judge Joseph T. Clark Magistrate Lewis F. Pettigrew

JUDGMENT ENTRY

{¶ 1} On February 15, 2011, the magistrate issued a decision recommending that plaintiff’s case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Civ.R. 41(B)(1). {¶ 2} Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) states, in part: “A party may file written objections to a magistrate’s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, whether or not the court has adopted the decision during that fourteen-day period as permitted by Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i).” No objections were filed. {¶ 3} The court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the magistrate’s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate’s

decision and recommendation as its own. Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Civ.R. 41(B)(1). Court costs are assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

_____________________________________ JOSEPH T. CLARK Judge

cc:

Steven C. McGann A ssistant Attorney General 150 East Gay Street, 18th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130 Paul Joseth Moore Franklin County Jail 370 South Front Street Columbus, Ohio 43215

RCV/cmd / Filed March 31, 2011/3To S.C. reporter April 12, 2011
EPA ICR No. 2195.04 OMB Control No. 2070-0169

Attachment G

Display Related to OMB Control #2070-0169 

Listings of Related Regulations in 40 CFR 9.1

As of May 10, 1993, the OMB approval numbers for EPA regulations in 

Chapter I of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) appear in a listing 

in 40 CFR 9.1 (58 FR 27472). This listing fulfills the display requirements in 

section 3507(f) of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) for EPA regulations. The

listing at 40 CFR 9.1 displays this OMB Control number for the following 

regulations:

Program Title

Protections for Test Subjects in Human Research

40 CFR Citation OMB Control No.

26.1125...................................................................................2070-0169

26.1303...................................................................................2070-0169
#### In the Matter of Damien JJ., and Another, Children Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Tompkins County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Amy JJ., Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 792]

—Yesawich Jr., J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Tompkins County (Barrett, J.), entered August 14, 1998, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, to adjudicate respondent’s children permanently neglected, and terminated respondent’s parental rights.

In October 1996, respondent’s two sons were voluntarily placed in petitioner’s custody by their father. Because respondent was deemed unable to care for her children, they were assigned to foster care and petitioner established a service plan which focused, *inter alia,*on strengthening the parent-child relationship (increased visitation with the children was required), enhancing her parenting skills and having her participate in *758counseling. Because respondent failed to adhere to the plan, notably, respondent stipulated that she missed 33V2 of 48 scheduled visitation sessions, petitioner commenced the instant proceeding charging her with permanently neglecting the children and seeking termination of her parental rights. After fact-finding and dispositional hearings, Family Court granted the relief sought by petitioner and this appeal ensued.

We affirm. Respondent’s lone contention, that petitioner did not make diligent efforts to strengthen her ties with her children *(see,*Social Services Law § 384-b [7]) is unconvincing. The plan designed by petitioner was realistic and tailored to accommodate respondent’s individual situation *(see, e.g., Matter of Jesus JJ.,*232 AD2d 752, 753, *lv denied*89 NY2d 809), as it established for respondent regular supervised and unsupervised visitation with the children, and mandated that she undergo psychological evaluation and counseling and attend parenting classes.

Petitioner also provided respondent with significant assistance in complying with this plan *(see, Matter of Josephine O.,*245 AD2d 900, 901-902, *lv denied*91 NY2d 814). To that end, petitioner scheduled respondent’s visitation, including monthly visits while she was incarcerated, and recommended and arranged for mental health services as well as other programs. In short, it is apparent from this record that petitioner made “affirmative, repeated, and meaningful efforts” to foster the parent-child relationship *(Matter of Sheila G.,*61 NY2d 368, 385).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
#### § 452.10 Retaliation for exercising rights.

Section 609, which prohibits labor organizations or their officials from disciplining members for exercising their rights under the Act, and section 610, which makes it a crime for any person to use or threaten force or violence for the purpose of interfering with or preventing the exercise of any rights protected under the Act, apply to rights relating to the election of officers under title IV.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3003411-OCT-201008:02 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at July 31, 1996 and the Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the twelve months ended July 31, 1996 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                          77,105
<SECURITIES>                                    15,750
<RECEIVABLES>                                  723,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                    38,335
<INVENTORY>                                    571,056
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,746,773
<PP&E>                                       1,603,160
<DEPRECIATION>                                 922,847
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,431,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,677,998
<BONDS>                                        514,542
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,053
<COMMON>                                        46,565
<OTHER-SE>                                     868,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,431,428
<SALES>                                      3,611,538
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,611,538
<CGS>                                        2,805,640
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,805,640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               113,833
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,728
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                253,613
<INCOME-TAX>                                   102,713
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            150,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   150,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.15
        

</TABLE>
#### TAYLOR PARK LAND CO v BANTROLME

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 10895.

Decided Oct 6, 1930

H. B. Howells, Cleveland, for Land Co.

Charles F. Carr, Cleveland, for Bantrolme.

*686PER CURIAM

The court is of the' opinion, construing the contract not by any one phrase but considering its four corners, that whatever right there was reserved in the decedent with reference to the buildings, was a right personal to him only and that it ceased at his death and that therefore his heirs have no right to remove said buildings.

A decree will therefore be ordered in favor of plaintiff and a journal entry will be drawn accordingly.

Vickery, PJ, Levine and Cline, JJ, concur.
#### § 4000.25 What if I use the postal service of a foreign country?

If you send your submission or issuance using the postal service of a foreign country, your filing or issuance date is the date of receipt at the proper address.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSemi-Empirical Modeling and Prediction of Direct Combustor NoiseDue to turbofan design trends, advances in fan-noise-mitigation techniques, and expected aircraft configuration changes, the impact on overall airport community noise from certain aircraft-propulsion noise sources, such as fan and jet noise, will be reduced at all certification points in the future. The situation with regard to turbofan-core noise is less clear however. Combustor noise in particularâ€”which presently is an important core-noise component, but not dominant from an overall noise perspectiveâ€”could become more prominent in upcoming high-power-density core designs. Its detailed source structure in the combustor, including the indirect combustor-noise mechanism, and the effects of the propagation path through the engine and exhaust nozzle need to be better understood. This report reviews the current status of modeling and prediction of direct combustor noise. This work is carried out under the NASA Advanced Air Vehicles Program, Advanced Air Transport Technology Project, Aircraft Noise Reduction Subproject.Document ID20190000001Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHultgren, Lennart S.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredJanuary 2, 2019Publication DateDecember 1, 2018Subject CategoryEnvironment PollutionReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM?2018-220041GRC-E-DAA-TN63363Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 081876.02.03.50.06Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsTurbomachinery NoiseAeroacousticsCombustor NoiseAvailable DownloadsNameType20190000001.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 452.87 Dues paid by checkoff.

A member in good standing whose dues are checked off by his employer pursuant to his voluntary authorization provided for in a collective bargaining agreement may not be disqualified from voting by reason of alleged delay or default in the payment of dues. For example, the constitution and bylaws of a labor organization call for suspension of members whose dues are three months in arrears. Dues to be paid directly by a member are two months in arrears when the union changes to a checkoff system. The member may not be denied the right to vote merely because the employer is late in submitting the checked off dues for the first month. It would not be inconsistent with the Act, however, for a union to require a new member who executes a checkoff authorization to pay one month's dues in advance on the date he becomes a member in order to be in good standing for the current month.
(77 South. 1005)

#### WILLIAMS v. TOWN OF OXFORD.

(7 Div. 504.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 17, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Calhoun County; Hugh D. Merrill, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Horace E. Wadsworth, Deceased. Lee McCanliss et al., Copartners Composing the Firm of McCanliss, Coutant & Hinch, Appellants; Dorothy P. White, as General Guardian of Mary E. Wadsworth, an Infant, et al., Respondents.

Argued September 29, 1937;

decided October 19, 1937.

*591
      *Lee McCanliss*for appellants.

*Kenneth B. Keating*for Dorothy P. White, as general guardian, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Lottghran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
(80 South. 155)

#### CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RY. CO. v. PICKETT.

(4 Div. 511.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 12, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Houston County; H. A. Pearce, Judge.

Petition, for mandamus by Ocie L. Pickett to compel trial judge in the case of Ocie L. Pickett against the Central of Georgia Railway-Company to rescind an order setting aside an order of dismissal and restoring the cause to the docket.

Mandamus denied.

B. F. Reid, of Dothan, for appellant.

Charles A. Calhoun, of Birmingham, and Farmer & Farmer, of Dothan, for appellee.

BRICKBN, J.

Mandamus denied, under authority of Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Ocie L. Pickett, ante, p. 580, 80 South. 154, present term Court of Appeals.

Mandamus denied.
§ 23.120 Department of Labor requirements. ( a ) *In general.* The Executive Order minimum wage applicable from January 30, 2022 through December 31, 2022, is $15.00 per hour. The Secretary will determine the applicable minimum wage rate to be paid to workers performing work on or in connection with covered contracts on an annual basis, beginning January 1, 2023.
( b ) *Method for determining the applicable Executive Order minimum wage.* The Secretary will determine the applicable minimum wage under the Executive Order, beginning January 1, 2023, by using the methodology set forth in § 23.50(b).
( c ) *Notice* — ( 1 ) *Timing of notification.* The Administrator will notify the public of the applicable minimum wage rate to be paid to workers performing work on or in connection with covered contracts on an annual basis at least 90 days before any new minimum wage is to take effect.
( 2 ) *Method of notification* — ( i ) Federal Register. The Administrator will publish a notice in the Federal Register stating the applicable minimum wage rate to be paid to workers performing work on or in connection with covered contracts on an annual basis at least 90 days before any new minimum wage is to take effect.
( ii ) *Website.* The Administrator will publish and maintain on *https://alpha.sam.gov/content/wage-determinations ,* or any successor site, the applicable minimum wage rate to be paid to workers performing work on or in connection with covered contracts.
( iii ) *Wage determinations.* The Administrator will publish a prominent general notice on all wage determinations issued under the Davis-Bacon Act and the Service Contract Act stating the Executive Order minimum wage and that the Executive Order minimum wage applies to all workers performing on or in connection with such contracts whose wages are governed by the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Davis-Bacon Act, and the Service Contract Act. The Administrator will update this general notice on all such wage determinations annually.
( iv ) *Other means as appropriate.* The Administrator may publish the applicable minimum wage rate to be paid to workers performing work on or in connection with covered contracts on an annual basis at least 90 days before any such new minimum wage is to take effect in any other media that the Administrator deems appropriate.
( d ) *Notification to a contractor of the withholding of funds.* If the Administrator requests that a contracting agency withhold funds from a contractor pursuant to § 23.110(c), the Administrator and/or contracting agency shall notify the affected prime contractor of the Administrator's withholding request to the contracting agency.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 152 (Monday, August 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48182-48183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20001]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permit Application Received Under the Antarctic 
Conservation Act of 1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of Permit Applications Received Under the Antarctic 
Conservation Act.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the National Science Foundation 
(NSF) has received a waste management permit application for operation 
of a field research camp located in ASPA <greek-i>128--Western Shore of 
Admiralty Bay, King George Island by the Antarctic Marine Living 
Resources Program, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, La Jolla, CA. 
The application is submitted to NSF pursuant to regulations issued 
under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978.

DATES: Interested parties are invited to submit written data, comments, 
or views with respect to this permit application within September 7, 
2011. Permit applications may be inspected by interested parties at the 
Permit Office, address below.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Permit Office, Room 755, 
Office of Polar Programs, National

[[Page 48183]]

Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Polly A. Penhale at the above 
address or (703) 292-8030.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NSF's Antarctic Waste Regulation, 45 CFR 
part 671, requires all U.S. citizens and entities to obtain a permit 
for the use or release of a designated pollutant in Antarctica, and for 
the release of waste in Antarctica. NSF has received a permit 
application under this Regulation for operation of remote research 
field camp at ASPA <greek-i>128--Western Shore of Admiralty Bay, King 
George Island. The camp consists of four structures on the beach 
between Llano Point and Sphinx Hill which has been in use during the 
summer since 1977. The camp is used to house researchers (typically 6 
people), provide a base of research operations, and allow laboratory 
studies. Biological investigation is the primary research conducted 
from the camp.
    Designated pollutants would be associated with camp operations 
[typically air emissions and waste water (urine, greywater, and human 
solid waste)] and scientific activities (typically research materials). 
All wastes would be packaged and removed from the site for proper 
disposal in Chile or the U.S. under approved guidelines prior to the 
end of each season.
    The permit applicant is: George Watters, Director, US AMLR Program, 
Southwest Fisheries Service, NOAA, 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive, La 
Jolla, CA 92037 Permit application No. 2012 WM-002.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-20001 Filed 8-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P