alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7129

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ARMON O’NEAL BEAVERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CR-92-46, CA-97-815-R)

Submitted: December 15, 1998 Decided: January 5, 1999

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Armon O’Neal Beavers, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant

United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Beavers, Nos. CR-92-46; CA-97-815-R

(W.D. Va. July 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,015
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       25
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        207
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,297
<PP&E>                                              79
<DEPRECIATION>                                      39
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,946
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,011
<OTHER-SE>                                    (24,620)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,337
<SALES>                                            458
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   458
<CGS>                                              252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,464)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,464)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,464)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 119 

To authorize testimony by a former detailee of the Committee on the 

Judiciary. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony by a former detailee of the 

Committee on the Judiciary. 

Whereas the Committee on the Judiciary has received a request from an attorney in the Office of the General 

Counsel of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for a declaration from a former detailee of the Committee, Steven 

M. Dettelbach, for use in the Department of Justice’s administrative proceeding styled In re George A. Runkle, 

Jr., OARM–WB No. 06–2; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be taken 

from such control or possession but by permission of the 

Senate; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 119 ATS 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the former detailee of the Committee 

2 on the Judiciary, Steven M. Dettelbach, is authorized to 

3 provide a declaration for use in the administrative pro4 ceeding In re George A. Runkle, Jr., OARM–WB No. 06– 

5 2. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,475
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      119
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,648
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              594
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           400
<OTHER-SE>                                        (39)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,448
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,410
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,338)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     72
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (25)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 47
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        47
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC. (REGISTRANT)
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, David B. Swank, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify to
      the best of my knowledge and belief pursuant to Section 906 of
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:

      (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
      2006, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      result of operations of the Registrant.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter
63 title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.


Date:  May 12, 2006                            /s/ DAVID B. SWANK
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  David B. Swank
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  (Principal Financial Officer)
```

[113th Congress Public Law 147]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 1804]]

Public Law 113-147
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
815 County Road 23 in Tyrone, New York, as the ``Specialist Christopher 
   Scott Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Aug. 8, 2014 -  [H.R. 606]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SPECIALIST CHRISTOPHER SCOTT POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 815 County Road 23 in Tyrone, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Specialist Christopher Scott Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Christopher Scott Post Office Building''.

    Approved August 8, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 606 (S. 233):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            July 14, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 1, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              49
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,029
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,078
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          331,398
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,078
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               186,548
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                186,548
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            186,548
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   186,548
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 28 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 731
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 28

                          [Report No. 110-334]

     Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
         Commission with respect to broadcast media ownership.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 5, 2008

 Mr. Dorgan (for himself, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Kerry, Ms. Collins, Mr. Dodd, 
Mr. Obama, Mr. Harkin, Mrs. Clinton, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Biden, Mr. Reed, 
 Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Tester, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Leahy, Mrs. 
 Boxer, Mr. Feingold, Mr. Nelson of Florida, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Brown, 
Mrs. Murray, Mrs. McCaskill, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Inouye, Mr. 
 Durbin, and Mr. Levin) submitted the following resolution; which was 
  read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation

                              May 8, 2008

               Reported by Mr. Inouye, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
     Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
         Commission with respect to broadcast media ownership.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to 
broadcast media ownership (Report and Order FCC 07-216), received by 
Congress on February 22, 2008, and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.

                                                       Calendar No. 731

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 28

                          [Report No. 110-334]

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

     Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
         Commission with respect to broadcast media ownership.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 8, 2008

                       Reported without amendment
```
----

Removal from the register of Case C-554/03 (1)

(2004/C 273/53)

By order of 22 July 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-554/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the l'Ufficio del Giudice di Pace di Gorizia): Azienda Agricola Tomadin Silvano v A.G.E.A. (Agenzia Erogazioni in Agricoltura).

----

(1)OJ C 47 of 21.2.2004.

----
§ 301.2 Classes of disputes. ( a ) The disputes between an employee or group of employees and a carrier or carriers growing out of grievances or out of the interpretation or application of agreements concerning rates of pay, rules, or working conditions, including cases pending and unadjusted on the date of approval of this act (June 21, 1934, 48 Stat. 1185; 45 U.S.C. 151-162), shall be handled in the usual manner up to and including the chief operating officer of the carrier designated to handle such disputes; but, failing to reach an adjustment in this manner, the disputes may be referred by petition of the parties or by either party to the appropriate division of the Adjustment Board with a full statement of the facts and all supporting data bearing upon the disputes.
( b ) No petition shall be considered by any division of the Board unless the subject matter has been handled in accordance with the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, approved June 21, 1934.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Experimental & Integrative Activities (1193).                    

*Date/Time:*                         June 29, 2000, 8 a.m.-5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Room 120, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Anthony Maddox, CISE Educational Innovation, Experimental and Integrative Activities, Room 1160, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, VA 22230, Telephone: (703) 306-1981.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to the National Science Foundation for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate CISE Educational Innovation proposals submitted in response to the program announcement (NSF 00-33).                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: May 17, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-12828 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
----

RESERVE LISTS ( (1))

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/LA/11/03

ASSISTANT TRANSLATORS (LA 8)

(2004/C 285 A/03)

CZECH LANGUAGE

ESTONIAN LANGUAGE

HUNGARIAN LANGUAGE

LATVIAN LANGUAGE

LITHUANIAN LANGUAGE

MALTESE LANGUAGE

POLISH LANGUAGE

MERIT GROUP 1

MERIT GROUP 2

MERIT GROUP 3

SLOVAKIAN LANGUAGE

SLOVENIAN LANGUAGE

The lists will be valid until 31 December 2005 and may be extended.

----

(1)  At a candidate's request, his/her name will not be published.

----
(79 South. 199)

#### MASON v. STATE.

(7 Div. 541.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 29, 1918.)

Homicide c&wkey; 190(7) — Evidence—'Uncommunicated Threats.

Where self-defense is shown, evidence of recent uncommunicated threats is admissible to show purpose of attack. Evidence of such threats is frequently admissible in corroboration of communicated threats; and where it is doubtful which party was aggressor evidence of un■communicated threats is admissible.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Etowah County; J. E. Blackwood, Judge.

Andy Mason was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and he appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

The defendant was indicted for murder in the first degree, and upon the trial was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree and sentenced to ten years in the penitentiary.

L. B. Rainey and Thos. H. Stephens, both of Gadsden, for appellant. F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., and David W. W. Fuller, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMFORD, J.

During the trial there was evidence offered and admitted by the court tending to show that the day before the fatal difficulty the deceased had made threats against the defendant. After the evidence was closed, at the suggestion of the court, the solicitor moved the court to exclude all of the testimony relating to the threats made by the deceased against the defendant upon the ground that these threats had not 'been shown to have been communicated to the defendant. To this ruling of the court the detfendant then and there duly and legally excepted.

There was evidence for the defendant which, if believed, tended to show that at the time of the killing the deceased was making some demonstration or overt act of attack, under such circumstances as would authorize the defendant to strike in self-defense. Since the case of Roberts v. State, 68 Ala. 156, the doctrine has been well established in this state that, where a case of self-defense is shown, evidence of uncommunicated threats recently made is admissible for the purpose of showing the quo animo of such demonstration or attack, and also evidence of uneommunicated threats is frequently admissible in corroboration of communicated threats which have been admitted; and where it is doubtful which party commenced the difficulty, evidence of such threats is admissible to show who was the probable aggressor. Roberts v. State, supra; Ridgell v. State, 1 Ala. App. 94, 55 South. 327; Howard v. State, 172 Ala. 402, 55 South. 255, 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 990; Wilson v. State, 171 Ala. 25, 54 South. 572; Crumpton v. State, 167 Ala. 4, 52 South. 605; Turner v. State, 160 Ala. 40, 49 South. 828; Hammond v. State, 147 Ala. 79, 41 South. 761.

The other exceptions presented by the record will probably not arise upon another trial, but for the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




Return
      to Main
      Document





**EXPRESS
        SYSTEMS CORPORATION.**
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
        THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
  In
          connection with the Quarterly Report of Express Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
          Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
          and
          Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Brown,
          Principal
          Accounting Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Director of the
          Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
          Section
          906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
  /s/
        Richard Brown
 Richard
        Brown
 Principal
        Accounting Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Director
 August
        14, 2006
**EXHIBIT
        23.1**
 
 
 **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 We
        hereby
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
        Form
        S-8 (No. 333-99377) of Longview Fibre Company of our report dated January
        17,
        2006 relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of the
        effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
        of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form
        10-K.
 
 
 PricewaterhouseCoopers
        LLP
 Portland,
        Oregon
 January
        17, 2006
#### LIMA-TOLEDO RD CO v P U C

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21781.

Decided Dec. 18, 1929

Kinkade, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.