T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GERARDO G ARCI A LOPEZ , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 72658 A ge nc yN o. A 089- 958- 122 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y17, 2012** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , T H O M A S , an dS IL V E R M A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G er ar do G ar ci a L op ez , a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f M exi co, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s dec i si on denyi ng hi s app l i cat i on for c ance l l at i on of re m ov al a nd hi s m ot i on f

orac ont i nua nc e , a nd de ny i ng hi s m ot i on t o r e m and. W e ha ve 

# FI LED JU L 23 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 72658 2 j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f ors ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e the a g e n c y ’s c o n tin u o u s p h y s ic a l p r e s e n c e f in d in g . L an di n-Zavala v. G on zales , 488 F . 3d 11 50 , 11 51 (9th C i r. 20 07 ). W e r evi ew for abu se of di sc re t i on the deni alof a r e que s tf orac ont i nua nc e a nd the de ni a l of am ot i on t o r e ope n orr e m and. Sa ndoval-L un a v. Mukasey , 52 6 F . 3d 12 43 , 12 46 (9th C i r. 20 08 ) ( per c uri am ); Mo vs is ia n v . A s h c r o

ft , 395 F . 3d 1095, 1098 ( 9th C i r . 2005) . W e r e vi e w de novo du e p r o c e s s c la im s . Cruz R endo n v. H older , 6 0 3 F .3 d1 1 0 4 , 1 1 0 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. S ub st ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s f i nd i ng thatG ar ci a L op ez fa i l ed t o e s t abl i s h the r e qui s i t e t e n y e a r s of c ont i nuous phy s i c a l pr e s e nc e f orc anc e l l a t i on o f r e m o v a l a t th e tim e h e w a s s e rv e dw ith h is N o tic e to A p p e ar . See 8 U .S .C . § 1 22 9b (b)( 1)(A ), (d)( 1). T he a ge nc ydi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng G ar c i aL ope z ’ s m ot i on f o rac o n tin u a n c e f

o rf a ilu r e to s h o w g o o dc au s e . See 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 9 . G ar c ia L o p e z a ls o f

a ile dto s h o w h e w a s p r e ju d ic e db yth e d e n ia l o f th e c o n tin u an c e . See Cr uzR e ndon , 60 3 F . 3d at11 09 -11 (t o p re vai l on du e proces s c l ai m thathe w as deni ed ful l and fai r heari ng , al i en m ustshow prej ud i ce ). T h e B I A a c te dw ith in its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g G ar c iaL o p e z ’s m o tio n to re m and for fai l ure t o d em on strat e thatthe evi dence s ub m i tt ed w i th the m ot i on w as10- 72658 3 p r e v io u s lyu n a v a ilab le , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 1 ) ; G u z m a n v . I NS , 318 F . 3d 911, 91 3 (9th C i r. 20 03 ) ( per c uri am ) ( af fi rm i ng deni alof m ot i on t o reopen w here

“ ne w ” i nf

orm a t i on w a s a va i l abl e and c apabl e of di s c ove rypr i ort o he ar i ng) , a nd f orf a i l ur e t o s ubm i ts uf

f i c i e nte vi de nc e t o e s t abl i s h pr i m af a c i e e l i gi bi l i tyf

or c a n c e lla tio n o f

r e m o v a l, se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (1); Mendez- G ut i errez v . G on zales , 4 4 4 F .3 d1 1 6 8 , 1 1 7 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) ( p r im af a c ie e lig ib ilityis dem on strat ed by a s ho w i ng thatthere i s are as on abl e l i kel i ho od thatthe st atut ory re qu i re m ent s f

or re l i ef have been sat i sf

i ed). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.