alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Structuring the European Research Area’

Scheme: Trans-national access, integrating activities and accompanying measures

(Call identifier: FP6-2004-Infrastructures-5)

(2004/C 268/08)

Re-publication of 2004/C 263/11

----

(1)OJ L 232, 29.8.2002, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 294, 29.10.2002, p. 44.

(3)  Commission Decision C(2002) 4791, as amended by Decisions C(2003) 635, C(2003) 998, C(2003) 1951, C(2003) 2708, C(2003) 4571, C(2004) 48 and C(2004) 3330, all unpublished.

(4)OJ L 355, 30.12.2002, p. 23.

(5)OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(6)OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 1.

(7)  C(2003) 883 of 27 March 2003, as last amended by C(2004) 3337 of 1 September 2004.

(8)  The EPSS is a tool to assist proposers to develop and submit their proposals electronically.

----

ANNEX

1.   Specific programme: Structuring the European Research Area.

2.   Activity: Support for research infrastructures.

3.   Call title: Trans-national access, integrating activities and accompanying measures.

4.   Call identifier: FP6-2004-Infrastructures-5.

5.   Date of publication: 4 November 2004.

6.   Closure date(s): 3 March 2005, at 17.00 (Brussels local time).

7.   Total indicative budget: EUR 145 Million.

8.   Areas called, instruments and indicative budget per area: 

9.   Minimum number of participants (2): 

10.   Restriction to participation: None

11.   Consortia agreements: 

12.   Evaluation procedure: 

13.   Evaluation criteria: See Annex B1 of the Work Programme for the applicable criteria (including their individual weights and thresholds and the overall threshold) per area and instrument.

14.   Indicative evaluation and contractual timetable: 

----

(1)  I3 = integrated infrastructure initiative; CA = coordination action; SSA = specific support action.

Note: It is intended that a consortium supported through an integrated infrastructure initiative cannot be supported at the same time through a coordination action. It is also intended that an infrastructure supported for access within an integrated infrastructure initiative cannot be supported, at the same time, under the individual scheme for trans-national access, or vice-versa, or under a separate Integrated infrastructure initiative. An exception will be made only in those cases where the same infrastructure is offering different services under different contracts, provided a clear distinction can be demonstrated between the corresponding populations of potential users.

(2)  MS = Member States of the EU; AS (incl. ACC) = associated States; ACC = associated candidate countries. Any legal entity established in a Member State or associated State and which is made up of the requested number of participants may be the sole participant in an indirect action.

----
**EXHIBIT
31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, Albert
H. Pleus, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
 
 (1) I
have reviewed this quarterly report of a21, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005 of a21, Inc;
 
 (2) Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 (3) Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 (4) The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
 
 (a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)
disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and;
 
 (5) The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer 's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 (a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer 's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over
financial reporting.
 
 By:
      /s/ ALBERT H. PLEUS
      ----------------------------------
      Albert
      H. Pleus
      Chief
      Executive Officer
      (Principal
      Executive Officer)
      
      May
      13, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7964

TERRANCE LAMOUNT JAMES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. HUBERS, Sergeant, Central Prison; ROBERT

TERRY, JR., Hearing Officer, Central Prison;

DONNIE R. RAYNOR, Lieutenant, Central Prison;

HATTIE B. PIMPONG, Chief Disciplinary Hearing

Officer, Central Prison,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (CA-04-599-5-BO)

Submitted: March 10, 2005 Decided: March 15, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrance Lamount James, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Terrance Lamount James appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See James v.

Hubers, No. CA-04-599-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2004). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Serena Software, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2007 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, Jeremy Burton, Chief Executive Officer of Serena Software, Inc. certify that, to my knowledge:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Serena Software, Inc. at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    JEREMY
BURTONJeremy Burton President and Chief Executive Officer And Director


Date: September 14, 2007

This Certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Argued March 25;

affirmed April 21;

rehearing denied June 2, 1931

#### KIRKLEY *v.*PORTLAND ELECTRIC POWER CO.

(298 P. 237)

*Cassius B. Peck,*of Portland (Griffith, Peck & Coke, of Portland, on the brief), for appellant.

*Nicolas Jaureguy,*of Portland (Cake, Cake, Jaureguy & Tooze, of Portland, on the brief), for respondent.

*424KELLY, J.

Two assignments of error are urged in defendant’s brief.

The first assignment is that the trial court erred in refusing to give the following instruction as requested by the defendant:

> “The plaintiff admits that the lower half of the windshield was at the time of the accident covered with nontransparent sleet, and therefore the plaintiff was guilty of negligence as a matter of law.”

This requested instruction is based upon the provisions of paragraph (f) of subdivision 20 of section 1 of chapter 217 of General Laws for 1927, pp. 264, 271, which provides:

> “ (f) It shall be unlawful for any person to drive any vehicle upon a highway with any sign, poster or other nontransparent material upon the front windshield, side wings, side or rear windows of such motor vehicle other than a certificate or other paper required to be displayed by law.”

In construing this provision of the statute, we apply the rule of ejusdem generis, in accordance wherewith such terms as “other”, “other thing”, “others”, or “any other”, when preceded by a specific enumeration, are commonly given a restricted meaning and limited to articles of the same nature as those previously described: 25 R. C. L. 997, section 240, note 18, 36 Cyc. 1120, note 45.

 In thus construing the statute, we hold that sleet, which attaches to the windshield of an automobile, is not within the purview thereof. No error was committed in refusing to give the requested instruction above quoted.

*425The second assignment is that the trial court erred in refusing to give the following instruction as requested by the defendant:

> “If you find from the evidence that a reasonably prudent automobile driver under the circumstances would have had the automobile under such control as to have enabled the same to have been stopped within the range of the driver’s vision, and if you further find that the automobile in which plaintiff was riding was being, driven at such a rate of speed that it could not be stopped within the range of vision of the driver, then the driver of the automobile involved in this case was negligent, and if such negligence was the proximate cause, or contributed in the slightest degree to the proximate cause of the collision, you will return your verdict in favor of the defendant company.”

There is no pleading upon which to base this instruction.

It is not charged that plaintiff’s car could not have been stopped within the range of its driver’s vision.

The refusal of the court to give the requested instruction last above quoted was not error.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Bean, C. J., Band and Bossman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Albert H. Pleus, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of a21, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:





(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Date: August __, 2004
      /s/ Albert H. PleusAlbert H. PleusChairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Return
      to Main Document




**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
  **EXPRESS
        SYSTEMS, CORPORATIN.**
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
        THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Express Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randle
        Barrington-Foote, President, CEO, and Director of the Company, certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.  Date: 
            November 24, 2006
 /s/
        Randle Barrington-Foote
 ________________________
 Randle
        Barrington-Foote
 President,
        CEO, and Director
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12979]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; Notice of Decision on 
Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 4211, Department of Commerce, 
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 00-007.
    Applicant: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211.
    Instrument: Scanning Tunneling Microscope, Model STM 25DH.
    Manufacturer: Omicron Vakuumphysik GmbH, Germany.
    Intended Use: See notice at 65 FR 21397.
    Comments: None received.
    Decision: Approved. No instrument of equivalent scientific value to 
the foreign instrument, for such purposes as it is intended to be used, 
is being manufactured in the United States. Reasons: The foreign 
instrument provides:
    (1) Capability to operate at temperatures to 1500 deg. K, (2) a 
vibrationally isolated vacuum chamber capable to 10 <SUP>-</SUP>\11\ 
mbar and (3) vertical imaging of film surfaces with accuracy to 0.001 
nm. The National Institute of Standards and Technology and a university 
research center for advanced microstructure devices advise that (1) 
these capabilities are pertinent to the applicant's intended purpose 
and (2) they know of no domestic instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument for the applicant's intended 
use (comparable case).
    We know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being manufactured 
in the United States.

    Dated: May 16, 2000.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 00-12979 Filed 5-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       193,911,467
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   3,378,471
<MORTGAGE>                                  16,189,127
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             222,372,207
<CASH>                                       2,514,371
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             186,154
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      27,288,684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             288,368,775
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            207,115,725
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         20,069,565
<POLICY-OTHER>                               2,086,316
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,838,602
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       848,116
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,376,619
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               288,368,775
<PREMIUMS>                                  42,638,289
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         14,167,232
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             126,179
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 776,612
<BENEFITS>                                  20,767,497
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  (509,103)
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        33,439,632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,010,286
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,314,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,696,286
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                721,149
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,975,137
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
----

----

I Ανακοινώσεις

Επιτροπή

----

Ισοτιμίες του ευρώ (1)

27 Οκτωβρίου 2004

(2004/C 265/01)

1 ευρώ= 

----

(1)

Πηγή: Ισοτιμίες αναφοράς που δημοσιεύονται από την Ευρωπαϊκή Κεντρική Τράπεζα.

----

----

Προηγούμενη γνωστοποίηση συγκέντρωσης

(Υπόθεση αριθ. COMP/M.3598 — Repsol/Borealis Polímeros)

Υπόθεση υποψήφια για απλοποιημένη διαδικασία

(2004/C 265/02)

(Κείμενο που παρουσιάζει ενδιαφέρον για τον ΕΟΧ)

----

(1)ΕΕ L 24 της 29.1.2004, σ. 1.

(2)  Διατίθεται στην ιστοσελίδα της ΓΔ COMP:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

----

----

Μη διατύπωση αντιρρήσεων σχετικά με κοινοποιηθείσα συγκέντρωση

(Υπόθεση αριθ. COMP/M.3420 — GIMD/Socpresse)

(2004/C 265/03)

(Κείμενο που παρουσιάζει ενδιαφέρον για τον ΕΟΧ)

Στις 16 Ιουνίου 2004, η Επιτροπή αποφάσισε να μη διατυπώσει αντιρρήσεις για την παραπάνω κοινοποιηθείσα συγκέντρωση και να την κηρύξει συμβατή με την κοινή αγορά. Η απόφαση βασίζεται στο άρθρο 6 παράγραφος 1 στοιχείο β) του κανονισμού (EΟΚ) αριθ. 4064/89 του Συμβουλίου. Το πλήρες κείμενο της απόφασης διατίθεται μόνο στη γαλλική γλώσσα και θα δημοσιευθεί μετά την απάλειψη τυχόν επιχειρηματικών απορρήτων που περιέχει. Θα διατίθεται:

----

----

Ανακοίνωση για την επικείμενη λήξη ορισμένων μέτρων αντιντάμπινγκ

(2004/C 265/04)

2.   Διαδικασία

Οι κοινοτικοί παραγωγοί δύνανται να υποβάλουν γραπτώς αίτηση επανεξέτασης. Η αίτηση αυτή πρέπει να περιέχει επαρκή αποδεικτικά στοιχεία σύμφωνα με τα οποία η άρση των μέτρων αυτών θα μπορούσε να οδηγήσει στη συνέχιση ή την επανάληψη των πρακτικών ντάμπινγκ και της ζημίας.

Σε περίπτωση κατά την οποία η Επιτροπή αποφασίσει να επανεξετάσει τα εν λόγω μέτρα, οι εισαγωγείς, οι εξαγωγείς, οι αντιπρόσωποι της εξάγουσας χώρας και οι κοινοτικοί παραγωγοί θα έχουν τη δυνατότητα να αναπτύξουν, να απορρίψουν ή να σχολιάσουν τα θέματα που εκτίθενται στην αίτηση επανεξέτασης.

3.   Προθεσμία

Οι κοινοτικοί παραγωγοί μπορούν να υποβάλουν γραπτώς αίτηση επανεξέτασης, δυνάμει του προαναφερθέντος άρθρου 11 παράγραφος 2, η οποία πρέπει να περιέλθει στην Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή, Γενική Διεύθυνση Εμπορίου (τμήμα B-1), J-79 5/16, B-1049 Βρυξέλλες (2), μετά τη δημοσίευση της παρούσας ανακοίνωσης και το αργότερο τρεις μήνες πριν από την ημερομηνία που αναγράφεται στον κατωτέρω πίνακα.

----

(1)EE L 56 της 6.3.1996, σ. 1· κανονισμός όπως τροποποιήθηκε τελευταία από τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 461/2004 του Συμβουλίου (ΕΕ L 77 της 13.3.2004, σ. 12).

(2)  Τέλεξ COMEU 21877· φαξ (32-2) 295 65 05.

----