alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1471.145 Does this part address persons who are disqualified, as well as those who are excluded from nonprocurement transactions? Except if provided for in subpart J of this part, this part— ( a ) Addresses disqualified persons only to— ( 1 ) Provide for their inclusion in the *EPLS;* and
( 2 ) State responsibilities of Federal agencies and participants to check for disqualified persons before entering into covered transactions.
( b ) Does not specify the— ( 1 ) FMCS transactions for which a disqualified person is ineligible. Those transactions vary on a case-by-case basis, because they depend on the language of the specific statute, Executive order, or regulation that caused the disqualification;
( 2 ) Entities to which the disqualification applies; or
( 3 ) Process that the agency uses to disqualify a person. Unlike exclusion, disqualification is frequently not a discretionary action that a Federal agency takes.
#### Florence Richmond, an Infant, by Richard Richmond, Her Guardian ad Litem, et al., Respondents, *v.*Benjamin Krasne et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name of Krasne Bros., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.

Argued November 30, 1936;

decided December 31, 1936.

*473
      *Clarence S. Zipp, J. Austin Lyons*and *William J. Ahearn*for appellants.

*Thomas J. Milan, Robert X. Kuzmier*and *Richard C. Cotter*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hitbbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

FELIX CAPONE,

Petitioner

v.

AMERICAN HERITAGE FEDERAL CREDIT 

UNION,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 361 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of January, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 98 (Friday, May 19, 2000)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 32005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12912]



[[Page 32003]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part III





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Notice of May 18, 2000--Continuation of Emergency With Respect to Burma


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 98 / Friday, May 19, 2000 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 32005]]

                Notice of May 18, 2000

                
Continuation of Emergency With Respect to Burma

                On May 20, 1997, I issued Executive Order 13047, 
                effective at 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on May 
                21, 1997, certifying to the Congress under section 
                570(b) of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and 
                Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1997 (Public Law 
                104-208), that the Government of Burma has committed 
                large-scale repression of the democratic opposition in 
                Burma after September 30, 1996, thereby invoking the 
                prohibition on new investment in Burma by United States 
                persons, contained in that section. I also declared a 
                national emergency to deal with the threat posed to the 
                national security and foreign policy of the United 
                States by the actions and policies of the Government of 
                Burma, invoking the authority, inter alia, of the 
                International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 
                1701-1706).

                The National Emergency declared on May 20, 1997, must 
                continue beyond May 20, 2000, because the Government of 
                Burma continues its policies of committing large-scale 
                repression of the democratic opposition in Burma. 
                Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the 
                National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am 
                continuing the national emergency with respect to 
                Burma. This notice shall be published in the Federal 
                Register and transmitted to the Congress.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    May 18, 2000.

[FR Doc. 00-12912
Filed 5-18-00; 12:47 pm]
Billing code 3195-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Concepcion, Appellant.

[697 NYS2d 697]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blumenfeld, J.), rendered November 8, 1996, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant’s argument that he was deprived of a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct. When a case is tried without a jury, absent a showing of prejudice, the Trial Judge is presumed to have considered only competent evidence adduced at trial in reaching the verdict *(see, People v Robinson,*143 AD2d 376, 377). There is no basis for finding that the court considered anything but competent evidence. Bracken, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.
----

Action brought on 25 May 2004 by Przedsiebiorstwo Polmos Bialystock against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case T-180/04)

(2004/C 217/38)

Language of the case: English

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 25 May 2004 by Przedsiebiorstwo Polmos Bialystock, Bialystock, Poland, represented by Ms C. Bercial Arias, lawyer.

V & S Vin & Sprit AB was also a party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

----
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, Thomas
Flottmann, Chief Executive Officer of Manas Petroleum Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)           the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,
2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  June
17, 2008





/S/Thomas
Flottmann


_________________________________


Thomas
Flottmann


Chief
Executive Officer
§ 2704.201 Contents of application—in general. ( a ) An application for an award of fees and expenses under the Act shall be made to the Chief Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 520N, Washington, DC 20004-1710. The application shall identify the applicant and the underlying proceeding for which an award is sought.
( b ) The application shall state the amount of fees and expenses for which an award is sought. The application may also include a request that attorney's fees be awarded at a rate higher than $125 per hour because of an increase in the cost of living or other special factors.
( c ) The application may also include any other matters that the applicant wishes the Commission to consider in determining whether and in what amount an award should be made.
( d ) The application should be signed by the applicant or an authorized officer or attorney of the applicant. It shall also contain or be accompanied by a written verification under oath or under penalty of perjury that the information provided in the application is true and correct.
( e ) Upon receipt of an application, the Chief Administrative Law Judge shall immediately assign it for disposition to the administrative law judge who presided over the underlying Mine Act proceeding.
[63 FR 63176, Nov. 12, 1998, as amended at 67 FR 60863, Sept. 27, 2002; 77 FR 48430, Aug. 14, 2012]
§ 37.63 What are the authority and procedures for conducting post-approval compliance reviews? ( a ) The Director may initiate a post-approval compliance review of any recipient to determine compliance with the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIA and this part. The initiation of a post-approval review may be based on, but need not be limited to, the results of routine program monitoring by other Departmental or Federal agencies, or the nature or frequency of complaints.
( b ) A post-approval review must be initiated by a Notification Letter, advising the recipient of: ( 1 ) The practices to be reviewed;
( 2 ) The programs to be reviewed;
( 3 ) The information, records, and/or data to be submitted by the recipient within 30 days of the receipt of the Notification Letter, unless this time frame is modified by the Director; and
( 4 ) The opportunity, at any time before receipt of the Final Determination described in §§ 37.99 and 37.100, to make a documentary or other submission that explains, validates or otherwise addresses the practices under review.
( c ) The Director may conduct post-approval reviews using such techniques as desk audits and on-site reviews.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS LEGEND  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COYOTE NETWORK SYSTEMS, INC. AS OF AND FOR
THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                 1225
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         12292
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                            2130
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      22337
<PP&E>                                                10072
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (1880)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        41028
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 22996
<BONDS>                                                1534
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                            7000
<COMMON>                                              11167
<OTHER-SE>                                           (12110)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          41028
<SALES>                                               43318
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      43318
<CGS>                                                 28748
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         28748
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      26950
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     1893
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (13843)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (13843)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         (900)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (14743)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (1.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (1.50)


</TABLE>
§ 31.12 Effect on other regulations; supervision and coordination. ( a ) *Effect on other regulations.* All regulations, orders or like directions heretofore issued by any officer of the Department which impose requirements designed to prohibit any discrimination against individuals on the ground of race, color, or national origin under any program to which this part applies, and which authorize the suspension or termination of or refusal to grant or to continue Federal financial assistance to any applicant for or recipient of such assistance for failure to comply with such requirements, are hereby superseded to the extent that such discrimination is prohibited by this part, except that nothing in this part shall be deemed to relieve any person of any obligations assumed or imposed under any such superseded regulation, order, instruction, or like direction prior to the effective date of this part. Nothing in this part, however, shall be deemed to supersede any of the following (including future amendments thereof): ( 1 ) Executive Orders 10925, 11114 and 11246 and regulations issued thereunder,
( 2 ) The “Standards for a Merit System of Personnel Administration,” issued jointly by the Secretaries of Defense, of Health, Education and Welfare, and of Labor, 23 FR 734, or
( 3 ) Any other regulation or instruction insofar as it prohibits discrimination on the ground of race, color, or national origin in any program or situation to which this part is inapplicable, or prohibits discrimination on any other ground.
( b ) *Supervision and coordination.* ( 1 ) The Secretary may from time to time assign to officials of other departments or agencies of the government (with the consent of such department or agency) responsibilities in connection with the effectuation of the purposes of title VI of the Act and this part (other than responsibility for final decision as provided in § 31.11), including the achievement of effective coordination and maximum uniformity within the Department and within the executive branch of the Government in the application of title VI and this part to similar programs and in similar situations.
( 2 ) Any action taken, determination made, or requirement imposed by an official of another Department or agency acting pursuant to an assignment of responsibility under this subsection shall have the same effect as though such action had been taken by the Secretary.
[38 FR 17958, July 5, 1973, as amended at 68 FR 51367, Aug. 26, 2003]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001074545
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING VI, L.P.


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         85
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                        (100)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
[No. 49567-4-I.

Division One.

December 2, 2002.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Jeanne Frances McKelvy, *Respondent,*and William Rush McKelvy, Jr., *Appellant.*

Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-3-01654-3, Dale B. Ramerman, J., entered September 28, October 11, and November 13, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Cox, A.C. J., concurred in by Coleman and Grosse, JJ.
**Exhibit 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of ourreports dated February 15, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of The Lamson & Sessions Co., The Lamson & Sessions Co. management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of The Lamson & Sessions Co., included in this Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005:   Registration  Number Description   333-93251 The Lamson & Sessions Co. Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan033-62443 Form S-8 Registration Statement   333-12585 The Lamson & Sessions Co. Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors Form S-8 Registration Statement   333-46953 The Lamson & Sessions Co. Deferred Savings Plan Form S-8 RegistrationStatement   333-61911 The Lamson & Sessions Co. 1998 Incentive Equity Plan Form S-8333-63280 Registration Statement333-51330  333-118384     333-65795 The Lamson & Sessions Co. 1988 Incentive Equity Performance PlanForm S-3 Registration Statement     /s/ Ernst & Young LLPCleveland, Ohio
----

Removal from the Register of Case T-423/03 (1)

(2004/C 228/108)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

By order of 24 May 2004, the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-423/03, Elisabeth Saskia SMIT v Europol.

----

(1)OJ C 47 of 21.2.2004.

----
#### § 38.92 Written assurance.

A written assurance is the resolution document that may be used when the Director determines that a recipient has, within fifteen business days after receipt of the Letter of Findings or Initial Determination identifying the violations, taken all corrective actions to remedy the violations specified in those documents.
§ 2200.30 General rules. ( a ) *Format.* Pleadings and other documents (other than exhibits) shall be typewritten, double spaced, with typeface of text being no smaller than 12-point and typeface of footnotes being no smaller than 11-point, on letter size opaque paper (81 ⁄ 2 inches by 11 inches). All margins shall be 11 ⁄ 2 inches. Pleadings and other documents shall be fastened without the use of staples at the upper left corner.
( b ) *Clarity.* Each allegation or response of a pleading or motion shall be simple, concise, and direct.
( c ) *Separation of claims.* Each allegation or response shall be made in separate numbered paragraphs. Each paragraph shall be limited as far as practicable to a statement of a single set of circumstances.
( d ) *Adoption by reference.* Statements in a pleading may be adopted by reference in a different part of the same pleading or in another pleading or in any motion. A copy of any written instrument which is an exhibit to a pleading is a part of the pleading for all purposes.
( e ) *Alternative pleading.* A party may set forth two or more statements of a claim or defense alternatively or hypothetically. When two or more statements are made in the alternative and one of them would be sufficient if made independently, the pleading is not made insufficient by the insufficiency of one or more of the alternative statements. A party may state as many separate claims or defenses as it has regardless of consistency. All statements shall be made subject to the signature requirements of § 2200.32.
( f ) *Form of pleadings, motions, and other documents.* Any pleading, motion, or other document shall contain a caption complying with § 2200.31 and a signature complying with § 2200.32. The form and content of motions shall conform with § 2200.40.
( g ) *Burden of persuasion.* The rules of pleading established by this subpart are not determinative in deciding which party bears the burden of persuasion on an issue. By pleading a matter affirmatively, a party does not waive its right to argue that the burden of persuasion on the matter is on another party.
( h ) *Enforcement of pleading rules.* The Commission or the Judge may refuse for filing any pleading or motion that does not comply with the requirements of this subpart.
[84 FR 14558, Apr. 10, 2019; 84 FR 45654, Aug. 30, 2019]
§ 2701.2 Open meetings policy; closure of meetings. ( a ) *Policy.* Commission meetings will generally be open to public observation, including meetings concerning the disposition by the Commission of a formal adjudication. See 5 U.S.C. 522b(c)(10).
( b ) *Closure.* Meetings may be closed, or certain information about a meeting may not be disclosed under the circumstances contemplated by 5 U.S.C. 522b(c)(1)-(10), and under the procedures specified by 5 U.S.C. 552b (d) and (f). Commission employees may attend closed meetings of the commission unless the notice of a closed meeting states otherwise.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 43 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 43

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         relating to marriage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 25, 2008

   Mr. Wicker (for himself, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Craig, Mr. Roberts, Mr. 
     Inhofe, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Allard, Mr. Thune, and Mr. Shelby) 
  introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         relating to marriage.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. This article may be cited as the `Marriage Protection 
Amendment'.
    ``Section 2. Marriage in the United States shall consist only of 
the union of a man and a woman. Neither this Constitution, nor the 
constitution of any State, shall be construed to require that marriage 
or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than 
the union of a man and a woman.''.
                                 <all>
```