alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 80 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 80

 To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for 8 weeks of paid 
   leave for Federal employees giving birth, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

  Mr. Stevens introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for 8 weeks of paid 
   leave for Federal employees giving birth, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Family Leave Act''.

SEC. 2. PAID LEAVE.

    Section 6382(d) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``An employee'' and inserting ``(1) Except 
        as provided in paragraph (2), an employee''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) Special rules for maternity leave.--
            ``(A) In general.--Leave granted under subsection (a)(1)(A) 
        shall consist of paid leave for an eligible employee who gives 
        birth of at least 8 contiguous workweeks following the birth to 
        assist in her recovery.
            ``(B) Fathers.--Leave granted under subsection (a)(1)(A) 
        because of the birth of a child shall consist of paid leave of 
        at least 5 days for an eligible employee who is the child's 
        father.
    ``(3) Special rules for adopters' leave.--Leave granted under 
subsection (a)(1)(B) because of the placement of a child with an 
eligible employee for adoption shall consist of paid leave of at least 
5 days.''.

SEC. 3. PAID SCHOOL FUNCTION AND MEDICAL LEAVE.

    Section 6382 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(f) Responsible Parenting Leave.--
            ``(1) In general.--In addition to any leave provided under 
        subsection (a), an employee shall be entitled to a total of 8 
        hours paid leave, which may be taken intermittently during any 
        12-month period, to accompany the employee's child to--
                    ``(A) a medical or dental appointment;
                    ``(B) an appointment with a teacher or other 
                official of an elementary or secondary school; or
                    ``(C) a school function.
            ``(2) Multiple children.--Paragraph (1) applies separately 
        to each child of an employee.''.
                               <all>D23/
```
# SSBG Reports

Listen

Publication Date:

Current as of:June 17, 2024

##       Introduction  

Expand

### SSBG Annual Reports

                              - SSBG Annual Report FY 2022
                              - SSBG Annual Report FY 2021
                              - SSBG Annual Report FY 2020
                              - SSBG Annual Report FY 2019
                              - SSBG Annual Report FY 2018
                              - SSBG Annual Report FY 2017
                              - SSBG Annual Report FY 2016
                              - SSBG Annual Report FY 2015
                              - SSBG Annual Report FY 2014
                              - SSBG Annual Report FY 2013
                              - SSBG Annual Report FY 2012
                              - SSBG Annual Report FY 2011
                              - SSBG Annual Report FY 2010

### SSBG Focus Reports

                              - SSBG Focus Report FY 2020
                              - SSBG Focus Report FY 2019
                              - SSBG Focus Report FY 2018
                              - SSBG Focus Report FY 2017
                              - SSBG Focus Report FY 2016
                              - SSBG Focus Report FY 2015
                              - SSBG Focus Report FY 2014
                              - SSBG Focus Report FY 2013

### SSBG State Profiles

                              - SSBG State Data FY 2015

Archived SSBG Annual Reports FY 2007-2009 and Focus Reports FY 2005-2009

 

Types:

ReportResearch

Audiences:

Grantees
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATIOIN
                                       OF
                          PERMA-TUNE ELECTRONICS, INC.


Pursuant to the provisions of Article 4.04 of the Texas Business Corporation
Act, the undersigned corporation adopts the following articles of amendment to
its Articles of Incorporation.

                                    ARTICLE I

The name of the corporation (hereinafter called "Corporation") is Perma-Tune
Electronics, Inc.

                                   ARTICLE II

The following amendments to the Articles of Incorporation were adopted by
unanimous written consent of the directors and by shareholders constituting
66.7% of the vote of the shareholders entitled to vote on June 3, 2002.

The amendment alters or changes Article IV of the Articles of Incorporation to
increase the authorized shares of common stock to 50,000,000 shares of common
stock. Article IV shall be modified to read as follows:

"The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall have authority to
issue is Fifty Million (50,000,000) without par value."

The number of shares of the Corporation outstanding at the time of the adoption
of the foregoing was 2,312,700 shares of common stock and the number of shares
entitled to vote thereon was 2,312,700. The number of shares consenting to the
action was 1,566,600. The shareholders consenting to the action represent a
majority of the issued and outstanding shares.

         Effective this 2nd day of August, 2002.


                                /s/ Lonnie Lenarduzzi
                                ------------------------------
                                Lonnie Lenarduzzi, Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                  ------------

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Marc S. Hermelin, Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.



Date:  June 14, 2004                         /s/ Marc S. Hermelin
                                    -----------------------------------------
                                                 Marc S. Hermelin
                                    Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)
#### § 417.19 Director's representative.

The Director shall appoint a representative or representatives whose functions shall be to supervise the hearing and vote. Such representative(s) shall have final authority to issue such rulings as shall be appropriate or necessary to insure a full and fair hearing and vote. Upon his own motion or upon consideration of the petition of any interested person the Director's Representative may disqualify any officer(s) or member(s) of the union from participation in the conduct of the hearing (except in the capacity of witness or counsel).

[29 FR 8264, July 1, 1964, as amended at 29 FR 8480, July 7, 1964 ; 78 FR 8025, Feb. 5, 2013]
Exhibit  99.4


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of Visualant, Incorporated on Form
10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mary Hethey, Chief
Financial  Officer  and Secretary Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge  and  belief:

          (1)  the  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

          (2)  the  information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations  of  the  Company.



                                          "Mary  Hethey"
                                          --------------
                                            Mary  Hethey
                                   Chief  Financial  Officer  and
                                      Secretary  Treasurer

Date:
§ 2570.10 Review by the Secretary. ( a ) The Secretary may review a decision of an administrative law judge. Such a review may occur only when a party files a notice of appeal from a decision of an administrative law judge within twenty (20) days of the issuance of such decision. In all other cases, the decision of the administrative law judge shall become final agency action within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 704.
( b ) A notice of appeal to the Secretary shall state with specificity the issue(s) in the decision of the administrative law judge on which the party is seeking review. Such notice of appeal must be served on all parties of record.
( c ) Upon receipt of a notice of appeal, the Secretary shall request the Chief Administrative Law Judge to submit to him a copy of the entire record before the administrative law judge.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARLON GLENN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 105 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED, and the Application for Relief is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              42
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (179)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,122
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,812
<PP&E>                                           6,658
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,174)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,531
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           413
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,512)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,463
<SALES>                                          8,252
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,059
<CGS>                                            3,839
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,710
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 602
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (988)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (988)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (988)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)
        

</TABLE>
(75 South. 1006)

#### RODEN v. STATE.

(8 Div. 516.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 5, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall County; W. W. Haralson, Judge.

W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Order entered April 15 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00838

- CV

CHERYL YOUNG , Appellant

V.

DALLAS COUNTY , Appellee

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial Dist rict Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. TX

- 19

- 01116

O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s April 13, 2022 motion for an extension of

time to file her corrected brief. We GRANT the motion. We ORDER the

corrected brief tendered to this Court by appellant on April 5, 2022 filed as of the

date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
§ 2520.104a-5 Annual reporting filing requirements. ( a ) *Filing obligation.* Except as provided in §§ 2520.104a-6 and 2520.104a-9, the administrator of an employee benefit plan required to file an annual report pursuant to section 104(a)(1) of the Act shall file an annual report containing the items prescribed in § 2520.103-1 within: ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) Seven months after the close of any plan year which begins after December 31, 1975, unless extended. See “When to file” instructions of the appropriate Annual Return/Report Form.
( b ) *Where to file.* The annual report described in § 2520.103-1 shall be filed in accordance with and at the address provided in the instructions to the Annual Return/Report Form.
[43 FR 10152, Mar. 10, 1978; 43 FR 14010, Apr. 4, 1978; 67 FR 777, Jan. 7, 2002; 88 FR 11812, Feb. 24, 2023]
(79 South. 878)

#### BROADAWAY v. E. D. HOLLIS & CO.

(8 Div. 572.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 16, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson -County; W. W. Haralson, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
#### In the Matter of the Petition of Frederick Schloman to Vacate an Assessment for Sewers in Fifty-first and Fifty-sixth Streets.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,*

*Filed July 9, 1889.)*

Abatement and revivad—Taxes and assessments—Proceedings to vacate—When not revived.

Where, after proceedings commenced to vacate an assessment for a sewer, the petitioner dies and his executors make no application to revive or continue the proceedings until nearly fourteen years after the petitioner’s death, a motion to revive the proceedings in their behalf will be denied.

Appeal from an order denying a motion to revive the proceedings by making the executors of the petitioner the parties thereto in his behalf.

*P. A.*Hargous, for app’lt; *Q. L. Sterling,*for resp’t.

Daniels,

J.—This proceeding was commenced in December, 1873, and it has been allowed to remain in the condition in which it was placed by the service of the petition since then, until the present time. The petitioner himself died in June, 1875, and in the following month letters testamentary were issued upon his estate, to his executors, who made no application whatever to revive or continue the proceedings until the service of their notice of motion in the latter part of February, 1888.

For the reasons which have been given in the other cases already considered, this was sufficient to justify the order made by the court, and it should be affirmed, without costs. Van Brunt, Oh. J., and Brady, J., concur.
#### § 36.600 Notice of covered programs.

Within 60 days of September 29, 2000, each Federal agency that awards Federal financial assistance shall publish in the Federal Register a notice of the programs covered by these Title IX regulations. Each such Federal agency shall periodically republish the notice of covered programs to reflect changes in covered programs. Copies of this notice also shall be made available upon request to the Federal agency's office that enforces Title IX.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6594

EDWARD HAROLD SAUNDERS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; RICHARD W. RIDDLE, in

his individual and official capacity as an

agent of the State of North Carolina; JANICE

FAULKNER; ANGELA RIVERS, Controlled Substance

Enforcement Officer, in her individual and

official capacity as an agent of the State of

North Carolina; MURIEL K. OFFERMAN, Secretary

of Department of Revenue,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior

District Judge. (CA-99-47-5-BR)

Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: October 6, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Harold Saunders, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael David Youth,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Edward Harold Saunders, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the

district court. See Saunders v. North Carolina, No. CA-99-47-5-BR

(E.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 2003). With regard to Saunders’ due process

claim, our review of the record leads us to conclude that no

constitutional violation occurred. See Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S.

194, 201 (2001) (“If no constitutional right would have been

violated were the allegations established, there is no necessity

for further inquiries concerning qualified immunity.”). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Michael Weaks and/or All Occupants, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00108

- CV v.

First Horizon Home Loans, a Division of First Tennessee Bank National Association, Appellee Appeal from the County Cour t at Law No. 1 of Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.

CC1400136 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of thi s date, we find that the motion of the appellant to

dism iss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED APRIL 7, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EXHIBIT32.2

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarter Report of Twin Faces East Entertainment Corporation(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Stanley L. Teeple, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/StanleyL. Teeple        

StanleyL. Teeple

ChiefFinancial Officer

 

May 17,2005
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC
WALKERAG SUPPLY, LLC, et al Complainant,


### v. WAHOO AIRPORT AUTHORITY, WAHOO MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Respondent. FAADocket No. 16-14-08

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME
This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based onthe abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance withFAA Rules of Practicefor Federally-Assisted AirportEnforcementProceedings, 14 CFR Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFRPart 16, subpart B, the date bywhich the Director's Determination will be issued inthis matter is hereby extendedto November 21,2015. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.

irector, Airport Compliance and Management AnalysisCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July_2L, 2015, I caused to beplaced in the United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe foregoing document addressed to: Agent for Complainants: Mr. William Foster Better Airports, LLC 4504 North Versailles Avenue Dallas, Texas 75205
Counsel for Respondent: Mr. Larry S. Kaplan Mr. Keith Yamaguchi Kaplan, Massamillo & Andrews, LLC 200 West Madison Street 16th Floor Chicago, Illinois 60606 Copies to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAAAirport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100 FAA Central Region, ACE-600

# ~~ Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis
#### § 4068.4 Lien.

If any person liable to the PBGC under section 4062, 4063, or 4064 of ERISA fails or refuses to pay the full amount of such liability within the time specified in the demand letter issued under § 4068.3, the PBGC shall have a lien in the amount of the liability, including interest, arising as of the plan's termination date, upon all property and rights to property, whether real or personal, belonging to that person, except that such lien may not be in an amount in excess of 30 percent of the collective net worth of all persons described in section 4062(a) of ERISA and part 4062 of this chapter.
797 A.2d 895

#### In the Matter of John R. LOXTERMAN. Petition for Reinstatement from Inactive Status.

No. 169 DB 2001.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 21, 2002.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 21st day of May, 2002, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated April 26, 2002, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that JOHN R. LOXTERMAN, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.
(79 South. 879)

#### STANLEY v. INTERNATIONAL SHOE CO.

(5 Div. 283.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 4, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Chilton County; Leon McCord, Judge.

D. J. Plummer, of Ensley, for appellant. P. B. Collier, of Clanton, for appellee.

BROWN, P. J.

Affirmed for want of assignment of errors.