alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 24, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13043]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD01-00-134]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Hackensack River, NJ.

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast Guard District has issued a 
temporary deviation from the existing drawbridge regulations for the 
AMTRAK Portal Bridge, mile 5.0, across the Hackensack River at Little 
Snake Hill, New Jersey. This deviation allows the bridge owner to keep 
the bridge in the closed position from 7 a.m. June 3 through 7 a.m. 
June 4 and from 7 a.m. June 10 through 7 a.m. June 11, 2000. This 
deviation is necessary to facilitate necessary repairs to the bridge.

DATES: This deviation is effective at 7 a.m. on June 3, 2000 through 7 
a.m. on June 11, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Judy Yee, Project Officer, First 
Coast Guard District, (212) 668-7165.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The AMTRAK Portal Bridge has a vertical 
clearance of 23 feet at mean high water and 28 feet at mean low water. 
The existing regulations for the bridge in 33 CFR 117.723(c) require 
the bridge need not be opened Monday through Friday, except federal 
holidays, from 7:20 a.m. to 9:20 a.m. and from 4:30 p.m. to 6:50 p.m. 
At all other times, openings may not be delayed for more than 10 
minutes, unless the drawtender and the vessel operator communicating by 
radiotelephone, agree to a longer delay.
    The bridge owner, AMTRAK, asked the Coast Guard to allow the bridge 
to remain closed from 7 a.m. on June 3, 2000 through 7 a.m. on June 4, 
2000 and from 7 a.m. June 10, 2000 through 7 a.m. June 11, 2000. This 
deviation is necessary to facilitate repairs to the brakes at the 
bridge.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c), this work will be performed 
with all due speed in order to return the bridge to normal operation as 
soon as possible. This deviation is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: May 16, 2000.
G.N. Naccara,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 00-13043 Filed 5-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-U
#### KIPLINGER v ARMSTRONG et

Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Summit Co

No 1714.

Decided Feb 19, 1930

Slabuagh, Seiberling, Huber & Guinther, Akron, for Plaintiff, and defendants Olive T. Armstrong, Chester A. Irish, Harry A. Irish, Miles J. Irish and Eva May Conley.

Myers & Dinsmore, Akron for defendants Gerald Kiplinger and the heirs of Flossie Lehman.

Musser, Kimber & Huffman, Akron, for defendant Stella J. Kiplinger Taylor.

*287Funk, PJ and Washburn, J concur.

Full opinion will be published later. Watch Omnibus Index.

Ohio Common Pleas
#### *Ex parte,*The Bank of Watertown *vs.*The Assessors of the Village of Watertown.

Associations formed under the *general banicing law*of this state *are corporations*and as such liable like other monied institutions to he taxed on all lands and personal estate owned by them.

Motion for a mandamus. The property of the Bank of Watertown, an association under the *general hanking law*of 1838, was put down in an assessment list of property liable to taxation to defray the necessary expenses of the village of Watertown, at $70,000 ; and upon that sum a tax was imposed. The capital of the bank consists of $46,000 in state stocks, and $39,000 in bonds and mortgages. The stocks and the bonds and mortgages have been transferred to the comptroller of the state, in compliance with the act of 1838. It is now insisted that the property of an association thus formed, is not liable to taxation, and a motion is made for a *mandamus*to be directed to the assessors of the village of Watertown, commanding them to erase from the assessment list the sum assessed as a tax upon the bank.

*S. Stevens,*for the motion.

*D. Burwell,*contra.

**By the Court,*

Nelson, C. J.

We are of opinion that as- [ *687 ] sociations formed under the *general hanking laws*of 1838 are *524
      *corporations,*and as such liable like other monied institutions to be taxed on all lands and personal estate owned by them. The motion therefore must be denied.

Motion denied.
Exhibit 11.
 Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings


 For the periods ended March 31                           1999           1998

 Diluted earnings per common share:
   Average common shares outstanding                    356,831        106,386


 Net income (loss)                                    $ 295,464        $ 7,306
Diluted earnings per share:                             $ 0.83         $ 0.07


 Basic earnings per common share:
   Average common shares outstanding                    356,831        106,386

 Net income (loss)                                    $ 295,464        $ 7,306

Basic earnings per share:                                $ 0.83         $ 0.07
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 17, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 17, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0275. ARON REXHEPI v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

13B02824
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet for Little Squaw Gold Mining Company (a development stage 
company) at December 31, 1997 (audited) and the Statement of Income for the
year ended December 31, 1997 (audited) and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          29,014
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      20,471
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 49,485
<PP&E>                                          431,603
<DEPRECIATION>                                  167,603
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  313,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           199,004
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        846,850
<OTHER-SE>                                     (732,369)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    313,485
<SALES>                                          24,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 24,498
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 56,326
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (31,828)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (31,828)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (31,828)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .004
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .004
        









</TABLE>
§ 1982.103 Filing of retaliation complaints. ( a ) *Who may file.* An employee who believes that he or she has been retaliated against in violation of NTSSA or FRSA may file, or have filed by any person on the employee's behalf, a complaint alleging such retaliation.
( b ) *Nature of filing.* No particular form of complaint is required. A complaint may be filed orally or in writing. Oral complaints will be reduced to writing by OSHA. If the complainant is unable to file the complaint in English, OSHA will accept the complaint in any language.
( c ) *Place of filing.* The complaint should be filed with the OSHA office** responsible for enforcement activities in the geographical area where the employee resides or was employed, but may be filed with any OSHA officer or employee. Addresses and telephone numbers for these officials are set forth in local directories and at the following Internet address: *http://www.osha.gov .*
( d ) *Time for Filing.* Within 180 days after an alleged violation of NTSSA or FRSA occurs, any employee who believes that he or she has been retaliated against in violation of NTSSA or FRSA may file, or have filed by any person on the employee's behalf, a complaint alleging such retaliation. The date of the postmark, facsimile transmittal, electronic communication transmittal, telephone call, hand-delivery, delivery to a third-party commercial carrier, or in-person filing at an OSHA office will be considered the date of filing. The time for filing a complaint may be tolled for reasons warranted by applicable case law. For example, OSHA may consider the time for filing a complaint equitably tolled if a complainant mistakenly files a complaint with another agency instead of OSHA within 180 days after becoming aware of the alleged violation.
Exhibit 32

                   CONTINENTAL BEVERAGE AND NUTRITION, INC.
                              (Formerly Known as)
                   ADIRONDACK PURE SPRINGS MT.WATER CO., INC.

     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Continental  Beverage  and
Nutrition, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB of the period ended May 31, 2004
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof,  I,
David Sackler,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
(1) the quarterly  report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the
quarterly  report  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 19, 2004

/s/ David Sackler
President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### § 452.123 Elections of intermediate body officers.

Section 401(d) states that officers of intermediate bodies shall be elected either by secret ballot among the members in good standing or by labor organization officers representative of such members who have been elected by secret ballot. The phrase “officers representative of such members” includes delegates who have been elected by secret ballot to represent labor organizations in intermediate bodies. Such delegates may therefore participate in the election of officers of intermediate bodies regardless of whether they are characterized as officers of the labor organization they represent.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Visualant, Incorporated on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley E. Sparks, Chief
Executive Officer, President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge  and  belief:





(1)  the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and





(2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.









/s/
Bradley E. Sparks


Bradley
E. Sparks


Chief
Executive Officer, President and Director








Date:  February
19, 2008
----

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 2 July 2004

in Case T-9/03, Federazione Regionale Coltivatori Diretti della Sardegna and CIA v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(State aid - Action for annulment and compensation - Decision finding an aid scheme incompatible with the common market - Actions brought by representatives of potential beneficiaries of that scheme - Inadmissibility)

(2004/C 228/92)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case T-9/03, COLDIRETTI — Federazione Regionale Coltivatori Diretti della Sardegna, established in Cagliari (Italy) — Confederazione Italiana Agricoltori della Sardegna, established in Cagliari (Italy), represented by G. Dore and F. Ciulli, lawyers, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agent: V. di Bucci, with an address for service in Luxembourg), application, principally, for annulment of Commission Decision No 2002/785/EC of 7 May 2002 on the aid Italy is planning to grant under Article 21 of Region of Sardinia Law No 21/2000 to agricultural holdings using fuel other than methane, and, in the alternative, application for compensation for damage allegedly suffered by the applicants as the result of that decision, the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij, N.J. Forwood, I. Pelikánová and S.S. Papasavvas, Judges; Registrar: H. Jung, made an order on 2 July 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

----

(1)OJ C 55 of 8.3.2003.

----
#### § 5.27 “* * * fund, plan, or program”.

The contributions for fringe benefits must be made pursuant to a fund, plan or program (sec. 1(b)(2)(A) of the act). The phrase “fund, plan, or program” is merely intended to recognize the various types of arrangements commonly used to provide fringe benefits through employer contributions. The phrase is identical with language contained in section 3(1) of the Welfare and Pension Plans Disclosure Act. In interpreting this phrase, the Secretary will be guided by the experience of the Department in administering the latter statute. (See Report of Senate Committee on Labor and Public Welfare, S. Rep. No. 963, 88th Cong., 2d Sess., p. 5.)
#### Henry Thies, Appellant, *v.*Reich Bros. Long Island Motor Freight, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Frederick Beers, Respondent.

Argued January 20, 1937;

decided March 9, 1937.

*553
      *Elvin N. Edwards*and *Harvey J. George*for appellant.

*James G.*Purdy, *Arthur K. Wing George Wing*and *William J. Ahern*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: Hubbs, J.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lite King Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

Date:  March 15, 2006                           By:      /s/ David L. Norris
                                                         ----------------------
                                                Name:    David L. Norris
                                                Title:   Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lite King Corporation
and will be retained by Lite King Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
#### § 458.35 Bonding requirements.

Every officer, agent, shop steward, or other representative or employee of any labor organization subject to the CSRA or FSA (other than a labor organization whose property and annual financial receipts do not exceed $5,000 in value), or of a trust in which a labor organization is interested, who handles funds or other property thereof shall be bonded in accordance with the principles of section 502(a) of the LMRDA. In enforcing this requirement the Director will be guided by the interpretations and policies followed by the Department of Labor in applying the provisions of section 502(a) of the LMRDA and by applicable court decisions.

[45 FR 15158, Mar. 7, 1980; 45 FR 28322, Apr. 29, 1980. Redesignated at 50 FR 31311, Aug. 1, 1985, as amended at 78 FR 8026, Feb. 5, 2013]
(77 South. 1003)

#### HODGES v. ATLANTA, B. & A. RY. CO.

(7 Div. 493.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 22, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Randolph County; S. L. Brewer, Judge.

John W. Overton, of Wedowee, for appellee.

SAMFORD, J.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellee.
§ 4901.32 Fee schedule. ( a ) *Charges for searching and review of records.* Charges applicable under this subpart to the search for and review of records will be made according to the following fee schedule: ( 1 ) *Search time and review time.* For ordinary search services and review services, PBGC charges $54.00 per hour. PBGC charges fees in quarter hour increments.
( 2 ) *Retrieving records stored by NARA.* For disclosure requests that require the retrieval of records stored at a Federal records center operated by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), PBGC charges additional costs in accordance with the Transactional Billing Rate Schedule established by NARA.
( b ) *Charges for duplication of records.* Charges applicable under this subpart for obtaining requested copies of records made available for inspection will be made according to the following fee schedule and subject to the following conditions. ( 1 ) *Standard copying fee.* $0.15 for each page of record copies furnished.
( 2 ) *Voluminous material.* If the volume of page copy desired by the requester is such that the reproduction charge at the standard page rate would be in excess of $50, the person desiring reproduction may request a special rate quotation from PBGC.
( 3 ) *Indexes.* Pursuant to section 552(a)(2) of FOIA copies of indexes or supplements thereto which are maintained as therein provided but which have not been published will be provided on request at a cost not to exceed the direct cost of duplication.
( c ) *Other charges.* The scheduled fees, set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, for furnishing records made available for inspection and duplication represent the direct costs of furnishing the copies at the place of duplication. Upon request, single copies of the records will be mailed, postage prepaid, free of charge. Actual costs of transmitting records by special methods such as registered, certified, or special delivery mail or messenger, and of special handling or packaging, if required, will be charged in addition to the scheduled fees.
[61 FR 34123, July 1, 1996, as amended at 87 FR 43999, July 25, 2022]
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Crdentia Corp. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, John Kaiser, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes ofTitle 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to myknowledge:

 

1.                                       the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

ThisCertification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with theSecurities and Exchange Commission.

 

 
| Date:   November 14, 2007 | By:    | /s/  John Kaiser                      |
|--------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                           |   | John  Kaiser                          |
|                           |   | Chief  Executive Officer and Director |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Boyd's
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of, and for the three
months ended, March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           6,980
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,881
<ALLOWANCES>                                       459
<INVENTORY>                                     12,726
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,527
<PP&E>                                           6,020
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 277,027
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,115
<BONDS>                                        229,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      (67,415)
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,327
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   277,027
<SALES>                                         52,471
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,471
<CGS>                                           19,403
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,329
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,315
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,047
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,268
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    330
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,938
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24


</TABLE>