alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

## NO. 12

- 20

- 00030

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF T .R.,

A CHILD §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 321S T

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM
This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).
A party who is not excused by statute or the appellate rules from paying costs must pay

-- at the time an item is presented for fi ling

-- whatever fees are required by statute or Texas Supreme

Court order. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5. An appellate court may enforce Rule 5 by any order that is just.

Id

. A fter giving ten days ’ notice , an appellate court may dismiss an appeal because the appell ant
failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk
requiring a response or other action within a specified time. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).

On January 30, 2020 , the C lerk of this Court notified Appe llant, T.R., that the filing fee in
this appeal is due. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5. Appellant was informed that failure to remit the filing

fee on or before February 10 would result in the Court’s taking appropriate action, including

dismissal of the case wit hout further notice. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c). The date for remitting
the filing fee passed, and Appellant has not paid the fee or otherwise shown that he is excused
from paying the fee

. 1
Because Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is dismissed

. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).

1 The case information sheet provided by the Smith County District Clerk’s Office does not reflect that Appellant has been declared indigent.2 Opinion delivered February 19, 2020. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.3 

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

FEBRUARY 1 9 , 2020

NO. 12

- 20

- 00030

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T .R., A CHIL D

Appeal from the 321st District Court
of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 18

- 1250

- D)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being
considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this
appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed ; and that this decision be certified to the court below

for observance.
By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
# EUR-Lex - 31999R2353 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999R2353

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2353/1999 of 4 November 1999 establishing the forecast supply balance for olive oil for the Canary Islands under the specific measures provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1601/92 **

*
Official Journal L 282 , 05/11/1999 P. 0005 - 0006 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2353/1999

of 4 November 1999

establishing the forecast supply balance for olive oil for the Canary Islands under the specific measures provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1601/92

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1601/92 of 15 June 1992 concerning specific measures for the Canary Islands with regard to certain agricultural products(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999(2), and in particular Article 3(4) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2790/94 of 16 November 1994 laying down common detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1601/92 concerning specific measures for the Canary Islands with regard to certain agricultural products(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1620/1999(4), establishes specific measures for the Canary Islands with regard to certain agricultural products;

(2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2255/98(5) establishes the forecast supply balance for olive oil for the period 1 November 1998 to 31 October 1999;

(3) in order to enable the Canary Islands to be supplied with olive oil for the entire 1999/2000 marketing year, an additional forecast supply balance must be adopted for the period 1 November 1999 to 31 October 2000;

(4) in order to avoid any interruption in the arrangements, this Regulation should apply from 1 November 1999;

(5) the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for oils and fats,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the application of Articles 2 and 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 1601/92, the forecast balance for the supply of olive oil sector products benefiting from exemption from duties on imports from third countries or benefiting from Community aid shall be as laid out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 1 November 1999.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 November 1999.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 173, 27.6.1992, p. 13.

(2) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 80.

(3) OJ L 296, 17.11.1994, p. 23.

(4) OJ L 192, 24.7.1999, p. 19.

(5) OJ L 283, 21.10.1998, p. 5.

ANNEX

Forecast supply balance for olive oil for the Canary Islands for the period 1 November 1999 to 31 October 2000

>TABLE>

The quantities fixed may be exceeded up to a maximum of 20 % provided that the combined quantity for the products concerned is not exceeded.
(77 South. 1004)

#### MITCHELL v. STATE.

(7 Div. 525.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Feb. 12, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Calhoun County; Hugh D. Merrill, Judge.

F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRICKEN, J.

Appeal dismissed on motion of Attorney General.
§ 402.4 Subsequent reports. ( a ) Except as noted elsewhere in this paragraph, every labor organization which revises the most recent constitution and bylaws it has filed with the Office of Labor-Management Standards shall file two dated copies of its revised constitution and bylaws at the time it files its annual financial report as provided in part 403 of this chapter. However, a labor organization which has as its constitution and bylaws a uniform constitution and bylaws prescribed by the reporting labor organization's parent national or international labor organization in accordance with § 402.3(b) is not required to file copies of a revised uniform constitution and bylaws if the parent national or international labor organization files as many copies of the revised constitution and bylaws with the Office of Labor-Management Standards as the Office may request.
( b ) Every labor organization which changes the practices and procedures for which separate statements must be filed pursuant to subsection 201(a)(5) (A) through (M) of the Act shall file with the Office of Labor-Management Standards two copies of an amended Form LM-1, signed by its president and secretary or corresponding principal officers. The amended Form LM-1 shall be filed when the labor organization files its annual financial report as provided in part 403 of this chapter.
[58 FR 67604, Dec. 21, 1993]
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 57 FR 31451, July 16, 1992.

§ 20.212 Ending garnishment. ( a ) Once the Department has fully recovered the amounts owed by the debtor, including interest, penalties, and administrative costs consistent with the FCCS, the Department shall send the debtor's employer notification to discontinue wage withholding.
( b ) At least annually, the Department shall review its debtors' accounts to ensure that garnishment has been terminated for accounts that have been paid in full.
§ 501.21 Failure to cooperate with investigations. ( a ) No person shall refuse to cooperate with any employee of the Secretary who is exercising or attempting to exercise this investigative or enforcement authority.
( b ) Where an employer (or employer's agent or attorney) does not cooperate with an investigation concerning the employment of an H-2A worker, a worker in corresponding employment, or a U.S. worker who has been improperly rejected for employment or improperly laid off or displaced, WHD may make such information available to OFLC and may recommend that OFLC revoke the existing certification that is the basis for the employment of the H-2A workers giving rise to the investigation. In addition, WHD may take such action as appropriate, including initiating proceedings for the debarment of the employer, agent, or attorney from future certification for up to 3 years, seeking an injunction, and/or assessing civil money penalties against any person who has failed to cooperate with a WHD investigation. The taking of any one action shall not bar the taking of any additional action.
PUBLIC LAW 115–266—OCT. 11, 2018 132 STAT. 3755 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2269: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

June 19, considered and passed Senate. 

Sept. 28, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–266 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To reauthorize the Global Food Security Act of 2016 for 5 additional years. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Global Food Security Reauthorization Act of 2017’’. 

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

(a) ASSISTANCE TO IMPLEMENT THE GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY

STRATEGY.—Section 6(b) of the Global Food Security Act of 2016 

(22 U.S.C. 9305(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2017 and 

2018’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2017 through 2023’’. 

(b) EMERGENCY FOOD SECURITY PROGRAM.—Section 492(a) of 

the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2292a(a)) is amended 

by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2017 and 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 

2017 through 2023’’. 

SEC. 3. GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION 

REPORTS. 

Section 8(a) of the Global Food Security Act of 2016 (22 U.S.C. 

9307(a)) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘Not later than 1 year and 2 years’’ and 

inserting ‘‘During each of the first 7 years’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘for 2017 and 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘at the 

end of the reporting period’’. 

Approved October 11, 2018. 

22 USC 9301 

note. 

Global Food 

Security 

Reauthorization 

Act of 2017. 

Oct. 11, 2018 

[S. 2269] 


smartinez on DSK30VT082PROD with PUBLAWS-1ST
EXHIBIT 23.3








Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To the Board of Directors


Madison Newspapers, Inc.


Madison, Wisconsin





We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Madison Newspapers, Inc. and Subsidiary as of September 26, 2010 and September 27, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.





We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. An audit includes consideration of internal controls over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.





In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Madison Newspapers, Inc. and Subsidiary as of September 26, 2010 and September 27, 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles.











/s/ McGladrey & Pullen LLP





Madison, Wisconsin


November 4, 2010
52 

46 

46 

58A 

43B 

53A 

46 

58A 

43B 

43A 

®
 0 20 40 

Mil

Created by the Malta Field Office in December 2012 Albers Equal Area, NAD83, Meters 

es 

1:2,000,000 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

HiLine District 

Soils

Major Land Resource Areas
 

Map shows the Major Land Resource Areas (MLRA)

within the planning area. Soils in the planning area 

are grouped geographically by MLRAs for 

descriptive purposes. 

43A - Northern Rocky Mountains 

43B - Central Rocky Mountains 

Map W.10 46 - Northern Rocky Mountain Foothills 

52 - Brown Glaciated Plain 

53A - Northern Dark Brown Glaciated Plains 

58A - Northern Rolling High Plains, Northern Part 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or 

completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by the BLM. This map may not meet

National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification. 

HiLine RMP 

State of Montana
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 57 FR 31451, July 16, 1992.

#### § 20.213 Actions prohibited by employer.

An employer may not discharge, refuse to employ, or take disciplinary action against the debtor due to the issuance of a withholding order under this subpart.
(77 South. 978)

#### HELLNER v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY.

(3 Div. 206.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 22, 1918.)

Criminal Law &wkey;>1129(l) — Appeal — Absence of Assignment of Error.

On appeal from conviction in the circuit court for violation of a city ordinance, no assignment of error having been made as required by law, motion to affirm will be granted.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; Leon McCord, Judge.

Mrs. E. Hellner was convicted of violation of one of the ordinances of the city of Montgomery, and she appeals. On motion to affirm.

Motion granted, and judgment affirmed.

Warren E. Andrews, of Montgomery, for appellee.

BRICKEN, J.

This defendant was convicted in the recorder’s court of the city of Montgomery for a violation of one of the ordinanoes of the city. On appeal to the circuit court of Montgomery county she was again convicted, from which judgment of conviction this appeal is taken.

On submission here a motion is made to-affirm the case for want of assignments of error, and, as no assignment of error has been made as required by law, the motion is granted, and the judgment of the circuit court of Montgomery county is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### § 404.6 Personal responsibility of signatories of reports.

Every labor organization officer or employee required to file a report under section 202(a) of the Act and under this part shall be personally responsible for the filing of such report and for any statement contained therein which he knows to be false.
----

----

I Ανακοινώσεις

Επιτροπή

----

Ισοτιμίες του ευρώ (1)

19 Αυγούστου 2004

(2004/C 210/01)

1 ευρώ= 

----

(1)

Πηγή: Ισοτιμίες αναφοράς που δημοσιεύονται από την Ευρωπαϊκή Κεντρική Τράπεζα.

----

----

Προηγούμενη γνωστοποίηση συγκέντρωσης

(Υπόθεση αριθ. COMP/M.3551 — CD&R/Culligan)

Υπόθεση υποψήφια για απλοποιημένη διαδικασία

(2004/C 210/02)

(Κείμενο που παρουσιάζει ενδιαφέρον για τον ΕΟΧ)

----

(1)ΕΕ L 24 της 29.1.2004.

(2)  Εκδόθηκε από την Επιτροπή στις 20 Ιουλίου 2004 και διατίθεται στην ιστοσελίδα της ΓΔ COMP:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

----
## Attachment A Supporting Documentation for 110(l) and 193 Demonstration Georgia Chapter 391 - 1 - 22, Georgia’s Clean Fueled Fleet

Rules
(75 South. 829)

#### SMITH v. STATE.

(3 Div. 257.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 29, 1917.

Rehearing Denied June 15, 1917.)

1. Homicide <&wkey;300(13) — Self-Defense—Instructions.

In a prosecution for murder, charges omitting freedom from fault in bringing on the difficulty were objectionable.

[Ed. Note. — For other casos, see Homicide, Cent. Dig. § 628.] . -

2. Criminal Law &wkey;789(2) — Instruction.

A charge failing to state of what the jury should be iu doubt was bad.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 1906-1908.]

*1543. Homicide <&wkey;35 — Manslaughter — Malice.

Defendant could be guilty of manslaughter without having entertained malice in the killing.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Homicide, Cent. Dig. § 56.]

Appeal from Circuit Court, Butler County; A. E. Gamble, Judge.

John Smith was convicted of manslaughter, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

The court refused to give, at the request of the defendant in writing, 13 charges, and the refusal of the court to give these charges calls for review.

R. B. Smythe, of Greenville, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMFORD, J.

[1] Charges 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, A2, and A3 are all objectionable for the reason, among others, that they omit freedom from fault in bringing on the difficulty.

[2] Charge 4 is bad because it fails to say of what the jury should be in doubt.

[3] Charges 8 and 9 are bad because the state might fail to prove malice and still the defendant would be guilty of •manslaughter.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 15


October 21, 2003


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated October 21, 2003 on our review of interim
financial information of LCNB Corp. and Subsidiaries (the "Company"), issued
pursuant to the provisions of Statement on Auditing Standards No. 100, as of
and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 and
2002 and included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter then ended, is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement
of the Company on Form S-8, filed on March 13, 2003. We are also aware of our
responsibilities under the Securities Act of 1933.


Very truly yours,



/s/ J.D. Cloud & Co. L.L.P.
----------------------------
J.D. Cloud & Co. L.L.P.
Cincinnati, Ohio








                                   -30-
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------


 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this
Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  for  the quarter ended March 31, 2003 fully
complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act  of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report
fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of  operations  of  the  Company.

This  19th  day  of  May,  2003.



                              /s/  Charles  M.  Jones,  III
                              -----------------------------
                              Charles  M.  Jones,  III
                              Chief  Executive  Officer



                              /s/  David  J.  Baranko
                              -----------------------
                              David  J.  Baranko
                              Chief  Financial  Officer


<PAGE>
§ 1955.42 Exceptions. ( a ) Within 30 days after service of the decision of the administrative law judge, any party may file with the Secretary written exceptions thereto with supporting reasons. Such exceptions shall refer to the specific findings of fact, conclusions of law, or terms of the rule or order excepted to; and shall suggest corrected findings of fact, conclusions of law, or terms of the rule or order referencing the specific pages of the transcript relevant to the suggestions. Requests for extension of time to file exceptions may be granted if the requests are received by the Secretary no later than 25 days after service of the decision.
( b ) If any timely exceptions are filed, the Secretary may set a time for filing any response to the exceptions with supporting reasons. All exceptions and responses thereto shall be served on all the parties.
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Serena Software, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended
October 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Nugent, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods presented.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    JOHN NUGENTJohn Nugent President
and Chief Executive Officer


Date: December 11, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Serena Software, Inc. and will be retained by
Serena Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification
is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.