alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 4043.65 Transfer of benefit liabilities. ( a ) *Reportable event.* Advance notice is required for a transfer of benefit liabilities, as described in § 4043.32(a).
( b ) *Waivers* — ( 1 ) *Complete plan transfer.* Notice under this section is waived if the transfer is a transfer of all of the transferor plan's benefit liabilities and assets to one other plan.
( 2 ) *Transfer of less than 3 percent of assets.* Notice under this section is waived if the value of the assets being transferred— ( i ) Equals the present value of the accrued benefits (whether or not vested) being transferred, using actuarial assumptions that comply with section 414(*l*) of the Code; and
( ii ) In conjunction with other assets transferred during the same plan year, is less than 3 percent of the assets of the transferor plan as of at least one day in that year.
( 3 ) *Section 414(l) safe harbor.* Notice under this section is waived if the benefit liabilities of 500 or fewer participants are transferred and the transfer complies with section 414(*l*) of the Code using the actuarial assumptions prescribed for valuing benefits in trusteed plans under §§ 4044.51 through 4044.58 of this chapter.
( 4 ) *Fully funded plans.* Notice under this section is waived if the transfer complies with section 414(*l*) of the Code using reasonable actuarial assumptions and, after the transfer, the transferor and transferee plans are fully funded as determined in accordance with §§ 4044.51 through 4044.58 of this chapter and § 4010.8(d)(1)(ii) of this chapter.
[80 FR 55002, Sept. 11, 2015, as amended at 89 FR 48300, June 6, 2024]
#### AMERICAN ROLLING MILL CO v BURCH

Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist, Butler Co

No. 446.

Decided December 30, 1929

Messrs. P. P. Boli, Hamilton, B. F. Harwitz, Middleton, & S. S. Stewart, Columbus, for Rolling-Mill Co.

Mr. C. W. Elliott, Middleton, for Burch.

*165PER CURIAM

Under the law of this state, plaintiff in error was entitled to a trial and a review. The statutes provide the. method of review.

A proceeding in error in law is an action. It is commenced by filing in the court, having jurisdiction to affirm, reverse, or modify the judgment, a petition in error, and causing a summons to issue out of such court and be served on the defendant in error or his attorney, as provided in the statutes.

The burden of causing a summons to be issued is cast upon the plaintiff in error, B. & O. Rd. Co. v. Ambach, 55 Ohio St. 553.

In the case at bar, the petition in error was filed in the Court of Appeals, and the proper precipe was attached to it. The summons was then issued out of the court of common pleas. No authority is cited nor have we been able to find any decided case which authorizes a court to assume jurisdiction of a cause of action or the parties thereto, where the statutory procedure for bringing the action has not been followed. We, therefore, come to the conclusion that the motion to quash the summons in error must be granted.

Cushing, PJ., Ross and Hamilton, JJ., concur.
§ 2200.206 Disclosure of information. ( a ) *Disclosure to employer.* ( 1 ) Within 21 days after a case is designated for Simplified Proceedings, the Secretary shall provide the employer, free of charge, copies of the narrative (Form OSHA 1-A) and the worksheet (Form OSHA 1-B) or their equivalents.
( 2 ) Within 30 days after a case is designated for Simplified Proceedings, the Secretary shall provide the employer with reproductions of any photographs or videotapes that the Secretary anticipates using at the hearing.
( 3 ) Within 30 days after a case is designated for Simplified Proceedings, the Secretary shall provide to the employer any exculpatory evidence in the Secretary's possession.
( 4 ) The Judge shall act expeditiously on any claim by the employer that the Secretary improperly withheld or redacted any portion of the documents, photographs, or videotapes on the grounds of confidentiality or privilege.
( b ) *Disclosure to the Secretary.* When the employer raises an affirmative defense pursuant to § 2200.207(b), the Judge shall order the employer to disclose to the Secretary such documents relevant to the affirmative defense as the Judge deems appropriate.
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

§ 4.133 Beneficiary of contract services. ( a ) The Act does not say to whom the services under a covered contract must be furnished. So far as its language is concerned, it is enough if the contract is “entered into” by and with the Government and if its principal purpose is “to furnish services in the United States through the use of service employees”. It is clear that Congress intended to cover at least contracts for services of direct benefit to the Government, its property, or its civilian or military personnel for whose needs it is necessary or desirable for the Government to make provision for such services. For example, the legislative history makes specific reference to such contracts as those for furnishing food service and laundry and dry cleaning service for personnel at military installations. Furthermore, there is no limitation in the Act regarding the beneficiary of the services, nor is there any indication that only contracts for services of direct benefit to the Government, as distinguished from the general public, are subject to the Act. Therefore, where the principal purpose of the Government contract is to provide services through the use of service employees, the contract is covered by the Act, regardless of the direct beneficiary of the services or the source of the funds from which the contractor is paid for the service, and irrespective of whether the contractor performs the work in its own establishment, on a Government installation, or elsewhere. The fact that the contract requires or permits the contractor to provide the services directly to individual personnel as a concessionaire, rather than through the contracting agency, does not negate coverage by the Act.
( b ) The Department of Labor, pursuant to section 4(b) of the Act, exempts from the provisions of the Act certain kinds of concession contracts providing services to the general public, as provided herein. Specifically, concession contracts (such as those entered into by the National Park Service) principally for the furnishing of food, lodging, automobile fuel, souvenirs, newspaper stands, and recreational equipment to the general public, as distinguished from the United States Government or its personnel, are exempt. This exemption is necessary and proper in the public interest and is in accord with the remedial purpose of the Act. Where concession contracts, however, include substantial requirements for services other than those stated, those services are not exempt. The exemption provided does not affect a concession contractor's obligation to comply with the labor standards provisions of any other statutes such as the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 327 *et seq.*), the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276a *et seq.;* see part 5 of this title) and the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 201 *et seq.*).
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust VI and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding VI, L.P. (the
"Partnership") for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kathleen Skero, Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General Partner of
the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING VI, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ KATHLEEN SKERO
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Kathleen Skero *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: August 9, 2006
______________________

*  Kathleen Skero functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intelligent Living Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael F. Holloran, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



DATED:

January 19, 2011

/s/ Michael F. Holloran

-----------------------------

Michael F. Holloran;

Chief Executive Officer and

Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
<PAGE> 1
                                  EXHIBIT 21

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name                                            Where Incorporated
----                                            ------------------
<S>                                             <C>
Alumatherm Heat Treating Company, L.L.C.	Delaware
Fabriform Metal Brazing, Inc.                   California
Houston Heat Treating Company                   Texas
Impind, Inc.                                    Delaware
Industrial Steel Treating Co.                   California
Merrell Enterprises, Inc.                       California
Metal-Lab of Wisconsin, Inc.                    Wisconsin
Quality Heat-Treat, Inc.                        Texas
Ticorm, Inc.                                    California
Lindberg de Mexico                              Mexico 
</TABLE>
Exhibit 10(aa)(11)

                             CONSULTING AGREEMENT

     AGREEMENT made as of August 7, 1997 between LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY, a
New York corporation, having its principal offices at 175 East Old Country Road,
Hicksville,  New York  11801  (hereinafter  the  "Company")  and  EBEN W.  PYNE,
residing in Old Westbury, New York (hereinafter the "Consultant");

     WHEREAS, the Company has requested that the Consultant perform services for
it; and WHEREAS,  the Consultant is willing to perform  consulting  services for
the Company;

     NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed that:

1.   Effective  August 7, 1997, the  Consultant  will be engaged as a Consulting
     Director  for a period  ending  on the day of the 1998  Annual  Meeting  of
     Shareholders. The Consultant will advise and counsel the Board of Directors
     and any of its committees on various business and financial matters and any
     other  areas  requested  by or on behalf of the Board of  Directors  of the
     Company.

2.   For such services,  the Consultant will receive an annual retainer equal to
     the annual retainer paid to a duly elected Director,  an additional $500.00
     for each Board or  Committee  meeting  attended  and the same  pension  and
     health   benefits   provided  to  a  duly  elected   director.   Consultant
     acknowledges  that he will  participate in the Company's  Directors'  Stock
     Unit Retainer Plan, which was effective  January 1, 1996, and that at least
     50% of  Consultant's  retainer  will be  applied to the  purchase  of stock
     units.

3.   The Consultant shall have the right to participate as a Consulting Director
     in the Company's Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors and the Company's
     Retirement Income Plan for Directors.

4.   This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York.
 
     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this  agreement  has been  executed  this 7th day of
August, 1997.

CONSULTANT                          LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY

/s/ EBEN W. PYNE                    By: /s/ KATHLEEN A. MARION
------------------                  -----------------------------
EBEN W. PYNE                              CORPORATE SECRETARY
§ 458.76 Duties and powers of the Administrative Law Judge. It shall be the duty of the Administrative Law Judge to inquire fully into the facts as they relate to the matter before him and to prepare, serve and submit his recommended decision and order pursuant to § 458.88. Upon assignment to him and before transfer of the case to the Administrative Review Board, the Administrative Law Judge shall have the authority to: ( a ) Grant requests for appearance of witnesses or production of ducuments;
( b ) Rule upon offers of proof and receive relevant evidence;
( c ) Take or cause depositions to be taken whenever the ends of justice would be served thereby;
( d ) Limit lines of questioning or testimony which are immaterial, irrelevant, or unduly repetitious;
( e ) Regulate the course of the hearing and if appropriate, exclude from the hearing persons who engage in misconduct and strike all related testimony of witnesses refusing to answer any questions ruled to be proper;
( f ) Hold conferences for the settlement or simplification of the issues by consent of the parties or upon his own motion;
( g ) Dispose of procedural requests, motions, or similar matters which shall be made part of the record of the proceeding, including motions to amend pleadings; also to recommend dismissal of cases or portions thereof, and to order hearings reopened prior to issuance of his recommended decision and order;
( h ) Examine and cross-examine witnesses and introduce into the record documentary or other evidence;
( i ) Request the parties at any time during the hearing to state their respective positions concerning any issue in the case or theory in support thereof;
( j ) Continue, at his discretion, the hearing from day-to-day, or adjourn it to a later date or to a different place, by announcement thereof at the hearing or by other appropriate notice;
( k ) Take official notice of any material fact not appearing in evidence in the record, which is among the traditional matters of judicial notice and also concerning which the Department of Labor by reason of its functions is presumed to be expert: *Provided,* That the parties shall be given adequate notice, at the hearing or by reference in the Administrative Law Judge's recommended decision and order, of the matters so noticed, and shall be given adequate opportunity to show the contrary;
( l ) Correct or approve proposed corrections of the official transcript when deemed necessary; and
( m ) Take any other action necessary under the foregoing and not prohibited by these regulations.
[45 FR 15158, Mar. 7, 1980. Redesignated and amended at 50 FR 31311, 31313, Aug. 1, 1985; 78 FR 8026, Feb. 5, 2013]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND THE INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                        18117000
<SECURITIES>                                  14500000
<RECEIVABLES>                                 43533000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2589000
<INVENTORY>                                   25622000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             103234000
<PP&E>                                        58823000
<DEPRECIATION>                                33764000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               151265000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         27411000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       9362000
<OTHER-SE>                                   103682000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 151265000
<SALES>                                      210258000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             215102000
<CGS>                                        148872000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                189487000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1565000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              465000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               23585000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   7120000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           16465000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  16465000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.86
        

</TABLE>
§ 452.138 Application of other laws. ( a ) Section 403[59] provides that no labor organization shall be required by law to conduct elections of officers with greater frequency or in a different form or manner than is required by its own constitution or bylaws, except as otherwise provided by the election provisions of the Act.
( b ) The remedy[60] provided in the Act for challenging an election already conducted is exclusive.[61] However, existing rights and remedies to enforce the constitutions and bylaws of such organizations before an election has been held are unaffected by the election provisions. Section 603[62] which applies to the entire Act, states that except where explicitly provided to the contrary, nothing in the Act shall take away any right or bar any remedy of any union member under other Federal law or law of any State.
[38 FR 18324, July 9, 1973, as amended at 50 FR 31311, Aug. 1, 1985] Footnotes -
452.138
[59] Act, sec. 403.
[60] Act, sec. 402.
[61] Act, sec. 403. See Daily Cong. Rec. 86th Cong., 1st sess., p. 9115, June 8, 1959, pp. 13017 and 13090, July 27, 1959. H. Rept. No. 741, p. 17; S. Rept. No. 187, pp. 21-22, 101, 104. Hearings, House Comm. on Education and Labor, 86th Cong., 1st sess., pt. 1, p. 1611. See also *Furniture Store Drivers Local 82* v. *Crowley,* 104 S.Ct. 2557 (1984).
[62] Act, sec. 603.
§ 37.115 What procedures does the Department follow for post-termination proceedings? ( a ) A grant applicant or recipient adversely affected by a Final Decision and Order issued under § 37.112(b) will be restored, where appropriate, to full eligibility to receive WIA Title I financial assistance if the grant applicant or recipient satisfies the terms and conditions of the Final Decision and Order and brings itself into compliance with the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIA and this part.
( b ) A grant applicant or recipient adversely affected by a Final Decision and Order issued under § 37.112(b) may at any time petition the Director to restore its eligibility to receive WIA Title I financial assistance. A copy of the petition must be served on the parties to the original proceeding that led to the Final Decision and Order. The petition must be supported by information showing the actions taken by the grant applicant or recipient to bring itself into compliance. The grant applicant or recipient has the burden of demonstrating that it has satisfied the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section. While proceedings under this section are pending, sanctions imposed by the Final Decision and Order under § 37.112(b) (1) and (2) must remain in effect.
( c ) The Director must issue a written decision on the petition for restoration. ( 1 ) If the Director determines that the grant applicant or recipient has not brought itself into compliance, he or she must issue a decision denying the petition.
( 2 ) Within 30 days of its receipt of the Director's decision, the recipient or grant applicant may file a petition for review of the decision by the Secretary, setting forth the grounds for its objection to the Director's decision.
( 3 ) The petition must be served on the Director and on the Office of the Solicitor, Civil Rights Division.
( 4 ) The Director may file a response to the petition within 14 days.
( 5 ) The Secretary must issue the final agency decision denying or granting the recipient's or grant applicant's request for restoration to eligibility.
§ 37.21 How long will the recipient's obligation under the assurance last, and how broad is the obligation? ( a ) Where the WIA Title I financial assistance is intended to provide, or is in the form of, either personal property, real property, structures on real property, or interest in any such property or structures, the assurance will obligate the recipient, or (in the case of a subsequent transfer) the transferee, for the longer of: ( 1 ) The period during which the property is used either: ( i ) For a purpose for which WIA Title I financial assistance is extended; or
( ii ) For another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits; or
( 2 ) The period during which either: ( i ) The recipient retains ownership or possession of the property; or
( ii ) The transferee retains ownership or possession of the property without compensating the Departmental grantmaking agency for the fair market value of that ownership or possession.
( b ) In all other cases, the assurance will obligate the recipient for the period during which WIA Title I financial assistance is extended.
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3351 — ARVINMERITOR/VOLVO (Axle Assets))

(2004/C 223/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
Do ingredients in the 

product seem to meet 

existing 152.25(f) 

ingredient criteria?

Yes 45Unknown 26No 64Total 135

EPA Analysis of Labeled Ingredients on Minimum Risk Insect Repellent Products

EPA conducted an analysis of labels of products sold as minimum risk personal insect repellents, since labels and ingredient lists for these products tended to be available through online retailers; personal insect repellent products seem to make up approximately 14 percent of products registered by states that make their registration databases publicly available. EPA found 136 products claiming to be exempt, or which were not registered with EPA. These products were identified through 1) publicly accessible state registration databases, 2) nationwide sales data compiled by Nielson Company, and 3) internet searches conducted throughout 2009. EPA attempted to locate labels for these products; front or back labels were found (usually through internet searches) for all but 26 products. EPA then compared any stated ingredients with those on the active and inert ingredients specified in or referenced by the exemption for minimum risk products. Findings are summarized in the table and chart below. 

Yes

45 products

33%

Unknown 

26 products

No

64 products

47%

Yes

45 products

33%

Unknown 

26 products 

19%

No

64 products

47%