alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(74 South. 1007)

#### TURNER v. STATE.

(6 Div. 104.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

March 23, 1917.)

Appeal from Criminal Court, Jefferson County; Win. E, Fort, Judge.

Gibson & Davis, of Birmingham, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BROWN, P. J.

The defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and appeals on the record, without a bill of exceptions. The record and proceedings of the trial appearing in all things regular, the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
**SECTION        32.0**

**SECTION        1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

| 1.   | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the Company                  as of and for the period covered by the                  Report. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                     |                                             |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|        |                                                                                     | /s/                  Michael H. Head   |
|   | Michael                  H. HeadPresident                    and Chief Executive Officer |

|                                      |                                                                                     |                                             |
|-------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |                                                                                     | /s/                  George J. Smith   |
|                                      | George                  J. SmithTreasurer                    and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                      |                                                                                          |
| Dated:                  February 13, 2008 |                                                                                     |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Railroad Administration 

          - 49 CFR Parts 209 and 230 
          - [FRA Docket No. RSSL-98-1, Notice No. 5] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of Transportation (DOT). 

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

On November 17, 1999, FRA published the final rule on inspection and maintenance of steam locomotives (65 FR 62828). The Inspection and Maintenance Standards for Steam Locomotives, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), parts 209 and 230, which took effect on January 18, 2000, sets forth new inspection and implementation requirements. FRA is holding a public meeting to explain the implementation schedule and general requirements for inspection and maintenance of steam locomotives under the rule. This meeting will also provide interested parties with the opportunity to discuss the rule and ask questions of the presenters. All parties interested in the new rule on inspection and maintenance of steam locomotives are invited to attend this meeting. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on July 27, 2000, at 8 a.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held on July 27, 2000, in room 570 of the Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building, One Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, Minnesota 55111-4007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 

George Scerbo, Motive Power & Equipment Specialist, Office of Safety, FRA, 1120 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone 202-493-6249); or 

Paul F. Byrnes, Trial Attorney, Office of Chief Counsel, FRA, 1120 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20590 (202-493-6032). 

Grady C. Cothen, 

Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program Development. 

[FR Doc. 00-12950 Filed 5-22-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
# EUR-Lex - 31999R1676 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999R1676

**Council Regulation (EC) No 1676/1999 of 19 July 1999 fixing the guide price for wine for the 1999/2000 wine year **

*
Official Journal L 199 , 30/07/1999 P. 0007 - 0007 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1676/1999

of 19 July 1999

fixing the guide price for wine for the 1999/2000 wine year

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 of 16 March 1987 on the common organisation of the market in wine(1), and in particular Article 27(5) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(2),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(3),

Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(4),

Whereas:

(1) when the guide prices for the various types of table wine are fixed, account should be taken of the objectives of the common agricultural policy; the objectives of the common agricultural community, to assure the availability of supplies and to ensure that supplies reach consumers at reasonable prices;

(2) if these objectives are to be achieved, it is of prime importance that the gap between production and demand should not be opened further; to that end, the guide prices for the 1999/2000 wine year should be set at the same levels as the previous year;

(3) the guide prices, as defined in Annex III to Regulation (EEC) No 822/87, must be fixed for each type of table wine representative of Community production,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 1999/2000 wine year, the guide prices for table wine shall be as follows:

>TABLE>

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 1 September 1999.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 July 1999.

For the Council

The President

K. HEMILÄ

(1) OJ L 84, 27.3.1987, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1627/98 (OJ L 210, 28.7.1998, p. 8).

(2) OJ C 59, 1.3.1999, p. 12.

(3) OJ C 219, 30.7.1999.

(4) OJ C 169, 16.6.1999.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 966 Engrossed Amendment House (EAH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 16, 2007.
      Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 966) entitled ``An 
Act to enable the Department of State to respond to a critical shortage 
of passport processing personnel, and for other purposes'', do pass 
with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Passport Backlog Reduction Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. REEMPLOYMENT OF FOREIGN SERVICE ANNUITANTS.

    Section 824(g) of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 (22 U.S.C. 
4064(g)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``; or'' and 
                inserting a semicolon;
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting ``; or''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new 
                subparagraph--
                    ``(C)(i) to provide assistance to consular posts 
                with a substantial backlog of visa applications; or
                    ``(ii) to provide assistance to meet the demand 
                resulting from the passport and travel document 
                requirements set forth in section 7209(b) of the 
                Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 
                2004 (Public Law 108-458; 8 U.S.C. 1185 note), 
                including assistance related to the investigation of 
                fraud in connection with an application for a 
                passport.''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by striking ``The authority'' and inserting 
                ``(a) The authority''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following new 
                subparagraphs:
                    ``(B) The authority of the Secretary to waive the 
                application of subsections (a) through (d) for an 
                annuitant pursuant to subparagraph (C)(i) of paragraph 
                (1) shall terminate on September 30, 2008.
                    ``(C) The authority of the Secretary to waive the 
                application of subsections (a) through (d) for an 
                annuitant pursuant to subparagraph (C)(ii) of paragraph 
                (1) shall terminate on September 30, 2009.''.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 966

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 16, 2007. 

Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 966) entitled ‘‘An Act to enable the Department of State to respond 

to a critical shortage of passport processing personnel, and 

for other purposes’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENT: 

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert: 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Passport Backlog Reduc3 tion Act of 2007’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REEMPLOYMENT OF FOREIGN SERVICE ANNU5 ITANTS. 

6 Section 824(g) of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 (22 

7 U.S.C. 4064(g)) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

9 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘; or’’ 

10 and inserting a semicolon; 

11 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the 

12 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

13 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

14 subparagraph— 
2 

•S 966 EAH 

1 ‘‘(C)(i) to provide assistance to consular 

2 posts with a substantial backlog of visa applica3 tions; or 

4 ‘‘(ii) to provide assistance to meet the de5 mand resulting from the passport and travel doc6 ument requirements set forth in section 7209(b) 

7 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Preven8 tion Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-458; 8 U.S.C. 

9 1185 note), including assistance related to the 

10 investigation of fraud in connection with an ap11 plication for a passport.’’; and 

12 (2) in paragraph (2)— 

13 (A) by striking ‘‘The authority’’ and insert14 ing ‘‘(A) The authority’’; and 

15 (B) by adding at the end the following new 

16 subparagraphs: 

17 ‘‘(B) The authority of the Secretary to 

18 waive the application of subsections (a) through 

19 (d) for an annuitant pursuant to subparagraph 

20 (C)(i) of paragraph (1) shall terminate on Sep21 tember 30, 2008. 

22 ‘‘(C) The authority of the Secretary to 

23 waive the application of subsections (a) through 

24 (d) for an annuitant pursuant to subparagraph 
3 

•S 966 EAH 

1 (C)(ii) of paragraph (1) shall terminate on Sep2 tember 30, 2009.’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 966 

AMENDMENT
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Kyocera Corporation
(the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 4, 2007



/s/ Makoto KawamuraName:

Makoto KawamuraTitle:

President and Representative Director(Principal Executive Officer)
### BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

WASHINGTON , D.C .

Agreement s Adopte d b yth e Traffi c Conference s o f th e Internationa l Ai r Transport Associatio n OST-2010 - O^^ f

APPLICATIO N FO R APPROVA L O F AGREEMENT S BY TH E INTERNATIONA L AI R TRANSPOR T ASSOCIATIO N lAT A AGREEMEN T APPROVE D & IMMUNIZE D DOCKET OST - W- / ^ ^5 / ACTIO N DAT

E CcA - l^ /

^l o Thi s approval an dgran t

o f antitras t immunity i s subject , wher e applicable , t o condition s previousl y imposed . Thi s actio n i s effectiv e after 7 day s unles s apetitio n i s file dunde r 1 4 CF R385.3 0 o r

arevie w i s undertake n o n th e Department' s ow n motion . I n vie w o f th e agreement' s noncontroversia l natur e an dth e availability o f th e aboveprocedure , th e Zl-cUy peijo di n 1 4 CF R303.4 2 i s waived . 

### RV - ( . _J(rT^^

/l ^ ny.^ . irector , Omc e o f

Internationa l Aviatio n



### 8 Octobe r201 0 Communication s wit h respect t o thi s documen t shoul d b e sen t t o Dougla s E . Lavi n Regiona l Vic e Presiden t - Nort h Americ a Internationa l Ai rTransport Associatio n 177 6 K.St.N.W . #12"^

Floo r Washingto n D C 2000 6
§ 4050.301 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *In general.* This subpart describes PBGC's missing participants program for small professional service defined benefit retirement plans not covered by title IV of ERISA. The missing participants program is a program to hold retirement benefits for missing participants and beneficiaries in terminated retirement plans and to help them find and receive the benefits being held for them. For a plan to which this subpart applies, this subpart describes what the plan must do upon plan termination if it elects to use the missing participants program for missing participants and beneficiaries who are entitled to distributions. This subpart applies to a plan only if it is a single-employer defined benefit plan that— ( 1 ) Is described in section 4021(a) of ERISA and not in any paragraph of section 4021(b) of ERISA other than paragraph (13), and
( 2 ) Terminates and closes out with sufficient assets to satisfy all liabilities with respect to employees and their beneficiaries.
( b ) *Individual account plans.* This subpart does not apply to an individual account plan under section 3(34) of ERISA, even if it is described in the same plan document as a plan to which this subpart applies. This subpart also does not apply to a plan to the extent that it is treated as an individual account plan under section 3(35)(B) of ERISA. For example, this subpart does not apply to employee contributions (or interest or earnings thereon) held as an individual account. (Subpart B deals with individual account plans.)
#### John J. Bennett, Jr., as Attorney-General of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Supreme Enforcement Corporation, Appellant.

Argued June 7, 1937;

decided July 13, 1937.

*503
      *John E. Leddy*and I. *Maurice Wormser*for appellant.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Colin McLennan*and *John F. X. McGohey*of counsel), for respondent.

*A. Lincoln Lavine, Edwin M. Otterbourg, Abraham Benedict*and *Frederic P. Houston*for New York County Lawyers Association, *amicus curiæ.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, Hubbs, Lotjghran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: O’Brien, J.
AFS-12-317-E April 20, 2012

Exemption No. 10512 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0404

Ms. Cathy Houston

Parent of Luke Shaffer 9450 Macie Loop Hayden, ID 83835

Dear Ms. Houston:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received April 6, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Luke Shaffer for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exempti on, if granted, would allow Luke Shaffer to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Luke Shaffer.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the2

petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Luke Shaffer exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Luke Shaffer is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Luke Shaffer to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved CRS during use of that CRS aboard a U.S.

aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Luke Shaffer’s parents or a caregiver accompanying him. Luke Shaffer may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind him. In addition, Luke Shaffer’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ADAN VALENCIA-GAMEZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-73440 

Agency No. A206-802-253 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 15, 2018**

Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Jose Adan Valencia-Gamez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming an immigration 

judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and 

relief under the Convention against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 21 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-73440 

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, 

Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition 

for review.

Valencia-Gamez does not challenge the agency’s finding that he failed to 

establish past persecution. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s 

determination that Valencia-Gamez failed to establish that any harm he fears in El 

Salvador would be on account of a protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder, 622 

F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (an applicant’s “desire to be free from harassment 

by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no 

nexus to a protected ground”). Thus, Valencia-Gamez’s asylum and withholding 

of removal claims fail. See id.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Valencia-Gamez failed to show it is more likely than not that he will be tortured

with the consent or acquiescence of the government of El Salvador. See Aden v. 

Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.