alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                 

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​. 

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 19, 2000. 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis**                     (JoAnne F. Lewellen, Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:                 

*1. MSB Financial, Inc.,*                     Manhattan, Montana; to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Manhattan State Bank, Manhattan, Montana.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 19, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-13128 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Greetin g s,
EPA has reviewed your extension request fo r the steam electric effluent guidelines q

uestionnaire for the Richmond Power and Li g ht, Whitewater Valle y

Station. The deadline for y

our p lant to submit Version 2 of the com p leted q uestionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010 . If y ou need assistance durin g the com p letion of the steam electric q uestionnaire, p lease contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353- 7560.
Sincerely, Pa g e 1 of 1

8/26/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C5691CCD

...
DMS Docket No. FAA-liKlZOIQ- O~39)

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed ~e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Person Contacted Date

.Iameo Dave Crotty 09112f07

I
§ 4221.8 Award. ( a ) *Form.* The arbitrator shall render a written award that— ( 1 ) States the basis for the award, including such findings of fact and conclusions of law (which need not be explicitly designated as such) as are necessary to resolve the dispute;
( 2 ) Adjusts (or provides a method for adjusting) the amount or schedule of payments to be made after the award to reflect overpayments or underpayments made before the award was rendered or requires the plan sponsor to refund overpayments in accordance with § 4219.31(d); and
( 3 ) Provides for an allocation of costs in accordance with § 4221.10.
( b ) *Time of award.* Except as provided in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section, the arbitrator shall render the award no later than 30 days after the proceedings close. The award is rendered when filed or served on the parties as provided in § 4221.13. The award is final when the period for seeking modification or reconsideration in accordance with § 4221.9(a) has expired or the arbitrator has rendered a revised award in accordance with § 4221.9(c).
( c ) *Reopened proceedings.* If the proceedings are reopened in accordance with § 4221.7 after the close of the hearing, the arbitrator shall render the award no later than 30 days after the date on which the reopened proceedings are closed.
( d ) *Absence of hearing.* If the parties have chosen to proceed without a hearing, the arbitrator shall render the award no later than 30 days after the date on which final statements and proofs are filed with him or her.
( e ) *Agreement for extension of time.* Notwithstanding paragraphs (b), (c), and (d), the parties may agree to an extension of time for the arbitrator's award in light of the particular facts and circumstances of their dispute.
( f ) *Close of proceedings.* For purposes of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the proceedings are closed on the date on which the last brief or reply brief is due or, if no briefs are to be filed, on the date on which the hearing or rehearing closes.
( g ) *Publication of award.* After a final award has been rendered, the plan sponsor shall make copies available upon request to the PBGC and to all companies that contribute to the plan. The plan sponsor may impose reasonable charges for copying and postage.
#### In the Matter of Lucious Green, Respondent, v Vera Mitchell, Appellant.

[697 NYS2d 899]

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court did not abuse its discretion in modifying a prior custody order by awarding petitioner father joint custody and primary physical placement of the parties’ minor child with specified visitation to respondent mother. In October 1996 petitioner established a change in circumstances, and respondent did not oppose the award of temporary custody to petitioner at that time. Respondent’s circumstances had improved by the time an evidentiary hearing was held in January 1998, but the court determined that it was in the child’s best interests to continue primary physical placement with petitioner. A custody determination by the trial court must be accorded great deference *(see, Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167, 173-174) and should not be disturbed where, as here, it is supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record *(see, Matter of Gill v Gill,*135 AD2d 1090, 1091). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Szczur, J. — Custody.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Wisner and Scudder, JJ.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic

and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of

any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go

to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 1 8

- BG

- 1 131

IN RE KAREN H. ROSS

201 8 D DN 2 85

A Member of the Bar of the

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Reg. No. 499517

BEFORE: Easterly

, Associate Judge , and Washington and Nebeker , Senior Judges

.

O R D E R

(FILED

– January 17, 2019)

On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Court of Nevada

suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for three years

, all but six months stayed in favor of probation with conditions for a period of two

years and six months ; this court’s October 29 , 201 8

, order directing respondent to

show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed ; and t he statement of

Disciplinary Counsel ; and it appearing that respondent failed to file a response to the

court’s show cause order but did file h er D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g) affidavit on

November 28 , 2018 , it is

ORDERED that Karen H. Ross is hereby suspended from the practice of law

in this jurisdiction for a period of three years nunc pro tunc to November 28, 2018.

The suspension is stayed all but the first six months in favor of a two

- year, six

- month

period of probation subject to the conditions imposed by the state of Nevada

. See In

re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010) ; In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007)

(rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in

which the respondent does not participate ).

PER CURIAM
§ 2704.308 Commission review. ( a ) Either the applicant or the Secretary of Labor may seek review by the Commission of the initial decision by the administrative law judge, but review shall be discretionary with the Commission.
( b ) The party seeking review shall file a petition for discretionary review so as to be received by the Commission at 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 520N, Washington, DC 20004-1710 within 30 days of the issuance of the initial decision by the administrative law judge. Each issue in dispute shall be plainly and concisely stated, with supporting reasons set forth. Except for good cause shown, no issue not raised before the administrative law judge shall be set forth in the petition for discretionary review. Review by the Commission shall be granted only by affirmative vote of two of the Commissioners within 40 days of the issuance of the initial opinion, except that within 30 days after the issuance of the initial decision by the administrative law judge, two or more Commissioners may in their discretion order the case for review without the filing of a petition. The latter procedure shall be reserved for novel questions of law or policy, however.
( c ) If review of the initial decision of the administrative law judge is granted by the Commission, the Commission shall, after allowing opportunity for presentation of views by opposing parties, review the case and issue its own order affirming, modifying or vacating in whole or in part the initial decision or directing other appropriate relief.
[47 FR 10001, Mar. 9, 1982, as amended at 63 FR 63178, Nov. 12, 1998; 67 FR 60863, Sept. 27, 2002; 77 FR 48430, Aug. 14, 2012]
Order entered October 19 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 19

- 00852

- CR

HECTOR MANUEL CARREO N, Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 20 4th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 17

- 11409

- Q

O RDER

On O c tober 15, 2020, the clerk ’s office filed a supplementa l clerk ’s record , followed within twenty

- eight minu tes , by a corrected supplem ental clerk ’s record.
We STR IKE the supplemental clerk ’s record filed at 2:47 p.m. on O c tober 15,
2020.
Before the Court is appellant ’ s pro se request for an extension of time to file his pro se response. We GRANT the r equest and ORDER appellant ’ s pro se response filed by January 12, 2021

. /s/ BILL PEDERSEN , III JUSTICE
#### § 4262.2 Definitions.

The following terms are defined in § 4001.2 of this chapter: *Code, controlled group, ERISA, fair market value, IRS, multiemployer plan, PBGC, plan,* and *plan sponsor.* In addition, for purposes of this part:

*Form 5500* means the Annual Return/Report of Employee Benefit Plan required to be filed for employee benefit plans under sections 104 and 4065 of ERISA and sections 6058(a) and 6059(b) of the Code.

*Merged plan* means merged plan as defined in § 4231.2 of this chapter.

*Merger* means merger as defined in § 4231.2 of this chapter.

*SFA coverage period* means the period beginning on the plan's SFA measurement date and ending on the last day of the last plan year ending in 2051.

*SFA measurement date* for a plan other than a plan described in § 4262.4(g) means the last day of the third calendar month immediately preceding the date the plan's initial application for special financial assistance was filed.

*Special financial assistance* or *SFA* means special financial assistance from PBGC under section 4262 of ERISA.

*Transfer and transfer of assets or liabilities* means transfer and transfer of assets or liabilities as defined in § 4231.2 of this chapter.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1926

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.96 Occupational foot protection.

Safety-toe footwear for employees shall meet the requirements and specifications in American National Standard for Men's Safety-Toe Footwear, Z41.1-1967.

[58 FR 35152, June 30, 1993]
TRTM_TYPE PROPPANT_TYPE 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952

FRAC BUXT

FRAC CER 1

FRAC GRVL

FRAC MRBL

FRAC PERF

FRAC RCCR

FRAC RCSD

FRAC SAND 22 51 47 129 572 2,203

FRAC U

FRAC WLNT

REFRAC BUXT

REFRAC CER

REFRAC RCCR

REFRAC RCSD

REFRAC SAND

REFRAC U
1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961

1 2 4 8 2 2 10 36

6,115 10,189 13,546 14,559 13,777 12,285 13,258 11,945 13,483

1

1 1
1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970

19 95 167 211 213 206 303 144 119

12,070 10,577 10,776 10,760 9,482 8,857 8,591 9,272 9,112

1 2 1

2 5 11 5 2 1
1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979

122 55 67 40 56 41 37 32 5

1

9,460 11,576 13,260 15,130 17,523 19,819 23,682 27,033 27,705

1 1

1
1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988

1

23 40 17 4 16 5 6 5 4

1

37,625 41,846 34,329 30,382 37,767 30,957 16,519 16,883 15,314

1 1 8 1
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998

1 1 1

8 1 5 2 3 7 1 41 8 7

1 1 2

1 5 2 1 7 3

16,344 22,018 14,400 18,325 15,037 17,124 16,676 21,436 25,641 22,744

1 1 9 25

2 1 1 3
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

2 11 35 235 262 321 191 254 279 59 21

4 22 38 49 417 731 1,258 599 556 640 285 132

1 1 4 6 2 1 2 13 4 3

1

1 1

11 48 28 21 62 58 23 23 32 66 31 9

69 247 441 421 651 556 620 283 326 552 288 163

20,708 30,438 39,444 33,815 42,166 51,687 63,563 82,473 89,968 99,204 56,526 63,906

5 27 62 114 210 18 10 2 19 3 1

1 1 11 6 24 12

2 1 5 1 1

4 11 4 2 3 1

3

2 1 4 1 2 2

1 49 48 60 74 156 161 157 205 160 118 235

1
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Michigan�s forest resources in...**
 
2001 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010
2011 | 2012
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.79: | A 13.80: | A 13.163/22:
Item Number:0083-B-04 (online) | 0083-B-05 (online)| 0084-N-22 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000561757
 
March 28, 2018
[No. 47846-0-I.

Division One.

November 18, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. C.D.H., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 99-8-50186-3, James A. Doerty, J., entered November 21, 2000. *Reversed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
# AGENCY:

 Bureau of Land Management.

# ACTION:

 Notice of Meeting of the Utah Advisory Council.

# SUMMARY:

 The Bureau of Land Management's Utah Statewide Resource Advisory Council meeting will be held on January 20-21, 2000, in Provo, Utah.

The purpose of this meeting is to provide the Council with an overview of Utah's recreation management program as well as developing guidelines for recreation management.

The meeting will be held at the Hampton Inn, (Sundance Room), 1511 South 40 East, Provo, Utah. It is scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. on January 20 and conclude at noon on January 21. A public comment period, where members of the public may address the Council, is scheduled from 12:30-1:00 p.m. on January 20. All meetings of the BLM's Resource Advisory Council are open to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Sherry Foot, Special Programs Coordinator, Utah State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 324 South State Street, Salt Lake City, 84111; phone (801) 539-4195.

Dated: January 10, 2000.

Sally Wisely,

Utah BLM State Director.

[FR Doc. 00-1291 Filed 1-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-M
§ 417.4 Pre-hearing conference. ( a ) Upon receipt of an application filed under § 417.3, the Chief, DOE shall cause an investigation to be conducted of the allegations contained therein, and if he finds probable cause to believe that the constitution and bylaws of the labor organization do not provide an adequate procedure for the removal of an elected officer(s) guilty of serious misconduct he shall: ( 1 ) Advise the labor organization of his findings and
( 2 ) Afford such labor organization the opportunity for a conference to be set not earlier than 10 days thereafter except where all interested persons elect to confer at an earlier time. Any such conference shall be conducted for the purpose of hearing the views of interested persons and attempting to achieve a settlement of the issue without formal proceedings.
( b ) ( 1 ) If: ( i ) The labor organization declines the opportunity to confer afforded under paragraph (a) of this section, and fails to undertake compliance with the provisions of section 401(h) of the Act, or if
( ii ) After consideration of any views presented by the labor organization the Chief, DOE still finds probable cause to believe that the removal procedures are not adequate and if agreement for the adoption of adequate procedures for removal has not been achieved and the labor organization refuses to enter into a stipulation to comply with the provisions of section 401(h) of the Act, the Chief, DOE shall submit his findings and recommendations to the Director.
( 2 ) Upon consideration of the Chief, DOE's recommendations, the Director may order a hearing to be conducted before an Administrative Law Judge duly assigned by him to receive evidence and arguments ( i ) on the applicability of section 401(h) of the Act to the labor organization involved, and
( ii ) on the question of whether its constitution and bylaws provide an adequate procedure for the removal of an elected union officer guilty of serious misconduct.
[29 FR 8264, July 1, 1964, as amended at 50 FR 31310, Aug. 1, 1985; 62 FR 6093, Feb. 10, 1997; 78 FR 8025, Feb. 5, 2013]
<PAGE> 1

                                                               ATTACHMENT II




                                 AMENDMENT TO
                         EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
                          K-V PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY
                             AND MARC S. HERMELIN

    This Amendment to the Employment Agreement dated December 16, 1996 (the
"Employee Agreement") by and between K-V Pharmaceutical Company ("Employer")
and Marc S. Hermelin ("Employee") is hereby entered into as of the 2nd day of
December, 1999.

    Whereas, Employer has deemed it desirable to provide funding assurances
to Employee with respect to death benefits that shall be provided to the
Employee in the event his employment should be terminated by reason of death;

    Whereas, Employer has deemed it on its best interest to fund the
contingency with a split dollar insurance policy for life with a guaranteed
return of premiums;

    Now Therefore, Employer hereby agrees with Employee that:

1.  Section 4 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by adding the
following paragraph at the end thereof to henceforth be read as paragraph

    (k): Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, in the event Employee dies
during employment prior to retirement at age sixty-five or termination after
a change in control prior to age sixty-five, proceeds from the $15 million
split dollar insurance policies less premiums paid by K-V, shall be
immediately paid to Employee's beneficiaries in lieu of the retirement
benefits under paragraphs 6 and 7, except as otherwise provided in paragraph
4(k). Notwithstanding the foregoing, such payment shall in no way be
construed so as to prevent or preclude the payment of life insurance benefits
to the Employee's designated beneficiary or beneficiaries as defined in
paragraph 5(a) and benefits under paragraphs 6 and 7 re-vest to Employee
through age 65 on a cumulative basis at: Age 58-12%, 59-24%, 60-36%, 61-48%,
62-51%, 63-54%, 64-57%, 65-60%.

2.  Except as amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employer and Employee have agreed to amend the Employment
Agreement, as hereinabove provided, as of the date set forth above.


                                                  K-V PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY

                                        Name: /s/ Gerald R. Mitchell
                                              ------------------------------
                                        Title: Vice President, Finance
                                              ------------------------------


                                              /s/ Marc S. Hermelin
                                              ------------------------------
                                                 Marc S. Hermelin
#### § 409.5 Maintenance and retention of records.

Each surety required to file any report under this part shall maintain records on the matters required to be reported which will provide in sufficient detail the necessary basic information and data from which the reports filed with the Office of Labor-Management Standards may be verified, explained or clarified and checked for accuracy and completeness, and shall keep such records available for examination for a period of not less than 5 years after the filing of the reports based on the information which they contain.
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 I, Rahul
Sen Gupta, Chief Financial Officer of Manas Petroleum Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 (1)           the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30,
2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:  November
14, 2008
 
 
 /s/ Rahul Sen
Gupta_
 Rahul Sen
Gupta
 Chief
Financial Officer, Acting Principal Accounting Officer