alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32000R2357 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R2357

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2357/2000 of 24 October 2000 amending Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 laying down special detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 as regards export licences and export refunds in the case of milk and milk products **

*
Official Journal L 272 , 25/10/2000 P. 0015 - 0015 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 2357/2000

of 24 October 2000

amending Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 laying down special detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 as regards export licences and export refunds in the case of milk and milk products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1670/2000(2), and in particular Article 31(14) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Under Article 5(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000(3), which is to apply from 1 October 2000, the possibility of using export licences with advance fixing of the refund for supplies to armed forces as referred to in Article 36(1)(c) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/1999(4), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1557/2000(5), will cease. In view of the economic significance of such supplies for the milk sector, a derogation should be granted from Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000 so as to re-establish without delay the possibility of fixing the refund for such supplies of milk products in advance.

(2) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 2 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 174/1999(6), the following paragraph is added after the first paragraph:"However, by derogation from the first paragraph, an export licence with advance fixing of the refund may be used to grant a refund for exports of milk products as referred to in Article 36(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999."

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 2000.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48.

(2) OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 10.

(3) OJ L 152, 24.6.2000, p. 1.

(4) OJ L 102, 17.4.1999, p. 11.

(5) OJ L 179, 18.7.2000, p. 6.

(6) OJ L 20, 27.1.1999, p. 8.
Exhibit 10.6 FY2015






TWENTY- NINTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This Twenty-Ninth Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of January 1, 2015, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("Employer") and Thomas Martin ("Executive").


Recitals


		
	A)
	On March 31, 1998 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive. 




		
	B)
	Said Employment Agreement has been amended on twenty-eight prior occasions;




		
	C)
	Employer and Executive now desire to amend the Employment Agreement, as set forth hereinbelow:


Agreement 


1.    Section 2.1 of the Agreement which provides:


2.1     Salary.  For Executive's services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $364,140 during each year of the Employment Term.  Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer's normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine.
 
is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2015, to provide as follows:


2.1    Salary.  For Executive's services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $375,064 during each year of the Employment Term.  Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer's normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine.




		
	2.
	All other terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain unaltered and fully effective.






Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.




EXECUTIVE                            EMPLOYER
PriceSmart, INC.


Thomas Martin                    By: ______________________                
Name:     Jose Luis Laparte    


Its:     CEO and President
#### § 452.3 Interpretations of constitution and bylaws.

The interpretation consistently placed on a union's constitution by the responsible union official or governing body will be accepted unless the interpretation is clearly unreasonable.[3]

###### Footnotes -
  452.3

[3] *English* v. *Cunningham,* 282 F.2d 848 (C.A.D.C. 1960).
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Amendments to Banking Laws

              																	United States. Congress					 and 	Sixty-Ninth Congress, 1925-1927. 						*Amendments to Banking Laws : Conference Report (To Accompany H.R. 2), June 15, 1926*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										June 15, 1926,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/988,			accessed on September 11, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Argued July 9,

affirmed July 17, 1928.

#### STATE *v.*CHARLEY WALKER.

(268 Pac. 1118.)

For appellant there was a brief over the name of *Mr. 8. A. Jetmore.*

For respondent there was a brief over the names of *Mr. E. M. Manning*and *Mr. E. E. Driscoll,*with an oral argument by *Mr. W. M. Duncan,*District Attorney.

PER CURIAM.

We see no merit in this appeal and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Aeeirmed.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Statistics of income.Individual income tax returns estimated data line counts.**
 
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011
 
SuDoc Number:T 22.2/15:12276/
Item Number:0956-J (online)
CGP systemNumber:000934700
 
March 21, 2018
Exhibit 32.1

    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of First Coastal Bancshares (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Don M.
Griffith, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1)    The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                                         /s/ Don M. Griffith
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Don M. Griffith
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                         August 14, 2003



                                       19
§ 301.7 Hearings. ( a ) Oral hearings will be granted if requested by the parties or either of them and due notice will be given the parties of the time and date of the hearing.
( b ) The parties are, however, charged with the duty and responsibility of including in their original written submission all known relevant, argumentative facts and documentary evidence.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Erik Herlyn, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial
  Officer of Manas Petroleum Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: April 15, 2009

*/s/ Erik Herlyn*Erik Herlyn 
  Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer 
  Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and 
  Principal Accounting Officer

---
#### TRUMBULL CO BOARD OF EDUCATION v STATE ex VAN WYE

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21999.

Decided March 26, 1930
#### Hennequin *vs.*Sands & Fox.

Where goods are sold, for which a note is to be given at *six months,*if the goods be delivered *488and the note not demanded until nearly *two months*after the sale, the condition will be deemed to have been *waived.*

Error from the New-York C. P. Hennequin sued Sands & Fox in an action of *replevin*in the *delinet*for a quantity of merchandise sold by the plaintiff to *J. P. Dillentash,*on the 19th September, 1838, amounting to $1,427,52. The goods were sold to *Dillentash,*a retail dealer of dry goods, upon the express condition that he should give his note for the amount, payable in *six months ;*the goods to be sent to *Dillentash,*and he to send his note to the plaintiff after he had examined the goods and compared them with the bill. On the day of sale the goods were sent to *Dillentash,*but he did not send his note. About the *twelfth*day [ *641 ] of November, 1838, a note was demanded from * *Dillentash,*who was sick but said he would give the note as soon as he was able to write. On the *nineteenth*of November he died. Two or three days before his death, his clerk, by his directions, delivered a quantity of goods to the defendants, (amongst which were a portion of the goods in question,) in payment of a debt. On this evidence the plaintiff rested. The defendant’s counsel moved for a *nonsuit*on the grounds: 1. That the delivery of the goods to Dillentash, was *absolute*and the title passed; and 2. That if the delivery was *conditional,*the condition was *waived*by lapse of time, before demand of the note. The presiding judge nonsuited the plaintiff, on which judgment was entered. The plaintiff sued out a writ of error.

*J. Miller,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. Prescott Hall,*for defendant in error,

cited 2 *Paige's R.*169 ; 1 *Edward's Ch. R.*141; 2 *Id.*430, 652 ; 6 *Cowen,*110; 6 *Wendell,*77 ; 8 *Id.*247; 22 *Id.*670; 4 *Wash. C. C. R.*588; 6 *Pickering,*262; 1 *Campb.*427, 513.

*By the Court,*

Nelson, C. J.

There can be no doubt that the judgment of the court below was correct, upon the second ground taken by the counsel for the defendant. Nearly *two months*had elapsed after the sale and delivery of the goods before any step was taken to insist upon the note being delivered ; and even then the agent of the plaintiff took the word of *Dillentash*that he would give the note when he got well.

Judgment affirmed.
Order entered August 10, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00738-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.V., S.V., AND S.V., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 469th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 469-56356-2016

ORDER

Before the Court is the parties’ August 8, 2018 joint motion for corrected order. In their 

motion, the parties state that they do not challenge the trial court’s rulings but seek an amended 

decree of divorce correcting several clerical errors. They attach a jointly prepared amended 

decree and ask the Court to enter it. Alternatively, they ask that the case be remanded for entry 

of the amended decree by the trial court. Appellant also states that she “withdraws her appeal to 

the extent [she] challenges the trial court’s rulings.” 

We construe the parties’ motion as an agreement to abate the appeal and permit 

proceedings in the trial court to effectuate their agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(C).

We GRANT the motion. We REMAND this case to the trial court to allow the trial court to 

sign the parties’ Amended Final Divorce Decree.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Piper 

McGraw, Presiding Judge of the 469th Judicial District Court, and all parties. 

We ABATE this appeal. The appeal will be reinstated in thirty days or when appellant 

files a motion to dismiss the appeal, whichever occurs sooner.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of

HORIZON BANCORPORATION, INC.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc., hereby certifies that:

1. Horizon Bancorporation, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc.'

/S/ Charles S. Conoley
Charles S. Conoley, 
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2004
#### Anon.

An affidavit of service of papers per mail, must state that the papers were enclosed in a *wrapper.*

An objection was taken to an affidavit of the service of papers per mail, on the ground that it was not stated that they were enclosed in a *wrapper.*The objection was sustained. Mr. Justice Brqnson observed that much had been done for the convenience of parties in the service of papers, and with the rule of the court in this particular there must be a strict compliance.
----

----

I Tiedonantoja

Komissio

----

Euron kurssi (1)

12. elokuuta 2004

(2004/C 205/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Lähde: Euroopan keskuspankin ilmoittama viitekurssi.

----

III Tiedotteita

Komissio

----

MEDIA PLUS — KEHITTÄMINEN, LEVITYS JA MYYNNINEDISTÄMINEN (2001—2005)

Eurooppalaisten audiovisuaalisten teosten kehittämisen, levityksen ja myynninedistämisen tukemista koskevan ohjelman täytäntöönpano

Ilmoitus ehdotuspyynnöstä EAC/35/04

Toimet myynninedistämisen ja markkinoille pääsyn tukemiseksi

(2004/C 205/02)

1.   Tavoitteet ja kuvaus

Ehdotuspyyntö perustuu eurooppalaisten audiovisuaalisten teosten kehittämisen, levityksen ja myynninedistämisen tukemista koskevan ohjelman täytäntöönpanosta (Media Plus — Kehittäminen, levitys ja myynninedistäminen) (2001—2005) tehtyyn päätökseen 2000/821/EY, jonka neuvosto on hyväksynyt 20. joulukuuta 2000 ja joka on julkaistu 17. tammikuuta 2001 ilmestyneessä Euroopan yhteisöjen virallisessa lehdessä L 13, s. 35.

Ohjelman tavoitteita ovat muun muassa seuraavat:

2.   Tukikelpoiset hakijat

Ehdotuspyyntö on osoitettu eurooppalaisille organisaatioille ja toimijoille, jotka edistävät toiminnallaan edellä kuvattujen tavoitteiden toteutumista.

Ehdotuspyyntöön voivat vastata organisaatiot ja toimijat, joiden sijoittautumismaa on jokin Euroopan unionin jäsenvaltioista tai Media Plus -ohjelmaan osallistuvista Euroopan talousalueen maista (Islanti, Liechtenstein, Norja) tai neuvoston päätöksen 2000/821/EY 11 artiklassa vahvistetut vaatimukset täyttävä valtio (Bulgaria).

3.   Budjetti ja hankkeiden kesto

Ehdotuspyyntöä EAC/35/04 varten varattu enimmäisbudjetti on 6,2 miljoonaa euroa.

Komission taloudellinen tuki voi olla enintään 50—60 prosenttia tukikelpoisista kokonaiskustannuksista.

Ehdotuspyyntö koskee yksinomaan hankkeita, jotka toteutetaan 1. tammikuuta 2005 ja 31. joulukuuta 2005 välisenä aikana.

4.   Ehdotusten jättöpäivä

Ehdotukset on jätettävä viimeistään:

5.   Lisätiedot

Lyhentämätön ehdotuspyyntö ja hakulomakkeet löytyvät seuraavalta Internet-sivulta:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/avpolicy/media/promo_en.html.

Hakemusten on oltava lyhentämättömän ehdotuspyynnön mukaisia ja ne on laadittava sitä varten tarkoitetulle lomakkeelle.

----
Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Bancorp of Indiana, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Harold Duncan,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as added by 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.




                                                         /s/ Harold Duncan
                                                         ----------------------
                                                         Harold Duncan
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                         May 12, 2003




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to First Bancorp of Indiana, Inc. and will be retained by First Bancorp
of Indiana, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### § 1988.115 Special circumstances; waiver of rules.

In special circumstances not contemplated by the provisions of these rules, or for good cause shown, the ALJ or the ARB on review may, upon application, after three-days' notice to all parties, waive any rule or issue such orders that justice or the administration of MAP-21 requires.
§ 4231.11 Actuarial calculations and assumptions. ( a ) *Most recent valuation.* All calculations required by this part must be based on the most recent actuarial valuation as of the date of filing the notice, updated to show any material changes.
( b ) *Assumptions.* All calculations required by this part must be performed by an enrolled actuary based on methods and assumptions each of which is reasonable (taking into account the experience of the plan and reasonable expectations), and which, in combination, offer the actuary's best estimate of anticipated experience under the plan.
( c ) *Updated calculations.* PBGC may require updated calculations and representations based on the actual effective date of a merger or transfer if that date is more than one year after the notice is filed, based on revised actuarial assumptions, or based on other good cause.
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 54

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas heart disease remains the leading cause of death in 

the United States; 

Whereas heart disease affects men, women, and children of 

every age and race in the United States, regardless of 

where they live; 

Whereas approximately 325,000 coronary heart disease 

deaths annually occur out of hospital or in an emergency 

room; 

Whereas approximately 95 percent of sudden cardiac arrest 

victims die before arriving at the hospital; 

Whereas sudden cardiac arrest results from an abnormal 

heart rhythm in most adults; 

Whereas in 27.4 percent of cases of sudden cardiac arrest, 

the victim is located in a place other than a hospital and 

receives cardiopulmonary resuscitation by a bystander; 

Whereas prompt delivery of cardiopulmonary resuscitation 

more than doubles the chance of survival from sudden 

cardiac arrest by helping to maintain vital blood flow to 

the heart and brain, increasing the amount of time that 

an electric shock from a defibrillator can be effective; 

Whereas an automated external defibrillator, even when used 

by a bystander, is safe, easy to operate, and highly effective in restoring a normal heart rhythm, significantly in-
2

•SCON 54 ES 

creasing the chance of survival for many victims if used 

immediately after the onset of sudden cardiac arrest; 

Whereas death or severe brain injury is likely to occur unless 

resuscitation measures are started no later than 10 minutes after the onset of sudden cardiac arrest; 

Whereas the interval between the 911 call and the arrival of 

EMS personnel is typically longer than 5 minutes, and 

achieving high survival rates therefore depends on a public trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator use; and 

Whereas the American Heart Association, the American Red 

Cross, and the National Safety Council are preparing related public awareness and training campaigns on 

cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external 

defibrillation to be held during the first week of June 

each year: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) supports the goals and ideals of a National 

4 Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Automated Ex5 ternal Defibrillator Awareness Week to establish 

6 well-organized programs to increase public training 

7 in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated ex8 ternal defibrillator use and to increase public access 

9 to automated external defibrillators; and 
3

•SCON 54 ES 

1 (2) calls upon the people of the United States 

2 and interested organizations to observe such a week 

3 with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

Passed the Senate December 6, 2007. 

Attest:

Secretary. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 54

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Supporting the designation of a week as ‘‘National 

External Defibrillator Awareness Week’’.Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Automated