alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2590.731 Preemption; State flexibility; construction. ( a ) *Continued applicability of State law with respect to health insurance issuers.* Subject to paragraph (b) of this section and except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, part 7 of subtitle B of Title I of the Act is not to be construed to supersede any provision of State law which establishes, implements, or continues in effect any standard or requirement solely relating to health insurance issuers in connection with group health insurance coverage except to the extent that such standard or requirement prevents the application of a requirement of this part.
( b ) *Continued preemption with respect to group health plans.* Nothing in part 7 of subtitle B of Title I of the Act affects or modifies the provisions of section 514 of the Act with respect to group health plans.
( c ) *Special rules* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Subject to paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the provisions of part 7 of subtitle B of Title I of the Act relating to health insurance coverage offered by a health insurance issuer supersede any provision of State law which establishes, implements, or continues in effect a standard or requirement applicable to imposition of a preexisting condition exclusion specifically governed by section 701 which differs from the standards or requirements specified in such section.
( 2 ) *Exceptions.* Only in relation to health insurance coverage offered by a health insurance issuer, the provisions of this part do not supersede any provision of State law to the extent that such provision requires special enrollment periods in addition to those required under section 701(f) of the Act.
( d ) *Definitions* — ( 1 ) *State law.* For purposes of this section the term *State law* includes all laws, decisions, rules, regulations, or other State action having the effect of law, of any State. *A* law of the United States applicable only to the District of Columbia is treated as a State law rather than a law of the United States.
( 2 ) *State.* For purposes of this section the term *State* includes a State (as defined in § 2590.701-2), any political subdivisions of a State, or any agency or instrumentality of either.
[69 FR 78778, Dec. 30, 2004; 70 FR 21147, Apr. 25, 2005; 79 FR 10312, Feb. 24, 2014]
#### Frank Connestro, Respondent, v American Hockey Centers, Ltd., Defendant, and William H. Hine, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 525]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant William H. Hine appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), dated September 14, 1998, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him, and granted so much of the plaintiffs cross motion as was for an extension of time to file his note of issue.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff failed to serve and file a note of issue and statement of readiness in response to the appellant’s notice pursuant to CPLR 3216 *(see generally, Baczkowski v Collins Constr. Co.,*89 NY2d 499; *Barrett v Littles,*260 AD2d 418).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Friedmann, J. P., Florio, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

 EXHIBIT 99.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Diomed Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly Report on
Form  10-QSB  for  the  three  months  ended  March  31,  2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
A.  Wylie,  Jr.,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that I have reviewed the Report and to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

(2)  The  information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 15, 2003                    By: /s/ JAMES A. WYLIE, JR.
                                          James A. Wylie, Jr.
                                          Chief Executive Officer



A  SIGNED  ORIGINAL  OF  THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED  TO DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC.
AND  FURNISHED  TO  THE  SECURITIES  AND  EXCHANGE  COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
REQUEST.


<PAGE>
### Regulatory Evaluation
DocketNo
. FAA- 

# Zolc;-rqq ( 20 i 

# 1

**~ ;J,~**  - z::;- 1- r\0 Directorate Identifier: -AD f(

nJ/1 

### make c han ge s to 

### th e m/u e s in the table he/ o w. 

### you 1//Usf en s ur<? the to ta ls upda te o cco rd ing l y. 

### (l ril ey do no t, 

### di c k (or 

### Tah) in to and then o wo[Th e c hanged ce ll. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e
. g., aircraft , engine, (e.g ., Inspection , propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + 

# u.s. for U
. S
. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs h e re access , testing , ( @ $85 /h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products 

### Inspection 2.0 $0 (H, 

### 437

**~**

**~** h,! ( I t) 1 ill \l i'l I IH; II l(l

Ill t

**~** ' ' \ 1 \H I ' (

**~** II [ i' ' I ( 

# " " t'lf' (•·' 11 I I I I (' ' 

### '· , 1 

### .;r 

# " : l ( < l ,I '- 1 1 •.Ill 

## ' (.l iH

**~** l '· \1 l ;) d() (· II \. \' II
l il\0 ' \., q (ttl 

### ' (1 ,,,l

lli I •, f.) II() ' I I (!()

,, (I 

# " ., 1: {;., •I ' lj lj !l \)0 '! ·, (l H! '· I if)

. ·' ' 'l{i!l 

## ' ' \ l

**~** i ) 'l IJ Otl 

### .

**f~ ~.~o**  l lo 

### ' t;

**~~~** t '• t} !.if;

The known number of products in compliance: 0 Total Costs of compliance for 

### U.S. fleet: $74 , 290 Costs covered under warranty 

## (ifknown) $0 On-Condition Costs: Ac tion Work-hours Labor co st Parts Co st Cost per Product (e . g ., Inspection , (i nc lude acc es s , (@ $85 /h our)

replacement ) tes ting , and clo s eup) 

### Replacement 

# .. - \ t, ;('



### c 

## A. · J AtriA ' <. i tilt ' I I (J\l ' ,) (I. I 

# " r 1.\ 

### r, 

## ' f: 'if 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use thisfi e ld to ex plain an y thing in the Estimated Cos t s table that was assum e d or mi g ht n ot b e obv io u s . This fi e ld can a l so b e use d to ex pla in w arranty costs ) :

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a " significant regulatory action " ?



# ~ YES* 

# D NO 

# k8J *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant?



# ~ YES* 

# D NO 

# k8J *Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer.



# , YES 

# D NO 

# k8J Explanation: 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?



# ·. YES* 

# D NO 

# k8J *Explanation:
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 8
#### § 2570.64 Consequences of default.

For 502(c)(2) civil penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.5(a) and (b) of this title. Failure of the respondent to file an answer to the notice of determination described in § 2560.502c-2(g) of this chapter within the 30 day period provided by § 2560.502c-2(h) of this chapter shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of his or her right to appear and contest the allegations of the notice of determination, and such failure shall be deemed to be an admission of the facts as alleged in the notice for purposes of any proceeding involving the assessment of a civil penalty under section 502(c)(2) of the Act. Such notice shall then become the final order of the Secretary, within the meaning of § 2570.61(g) of this subpart, forty-five (45) days from the date of service of the notice.

[68 FR 3737, Jan. 24, 2003]
#### § 417.7 Transcript.

An official reporter shall make the only official transcript of the proceedings. Copies of the official transcript shall be made available upon request addressed to the Director in accordance with the provisions of part 70 of this title.

[50 FR 31310, Aug. 1, 1985, as amended at 63 FR 33779, June 19, 1998; 78 FR 8025, Feb. 5, 2013]
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


K-V Pharmaceutical Company
St. Louis, Missouri

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Numbers 2-56793, 2-76173, 33-46400, 33-44927,
333-00199, 333-48252 and 333-85516) and Registration Statement on Form S-3
(File Number 333-87402 and 333-106294) of our reports dated June 4, 2004,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of K-V
Pharmaceutical Company appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
as of and for the year ended March 31, 2004.





Chicago, Illinois
June 11, 2004
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

United Airlines, Inc. Complainant,


### v. The Port Authority ofNew York

and New Jersey Respondent. ) 

### ) ) ) ) ) ) )



### ORDER FAA Docket No. 16-14-13

OnApril28, 2015, the FAAreceived the Respondent's Motion for Leave to File a Reply Memorandum ofPoints and Authorities to the Complainant's Answer to the Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment. OnApril27, 2015, the Director issued an Order denying the Respondent's Motionfor Summary Judgment Dismissing the Complaint. ACCORDINGLY, it is ordered that the Respondent's Motion for Leave to File a Reply Memorandum ofPoints and Authorities is denied as moot.

Randall S. Fiertz Director, Office ofAirport 

### CempliaBG€:

# ana Manag@m@Bt Analysis

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

HEREBY CERTIFYthat on May_/, 2015, I causedto be placed inthe United States mail (first class, postage paid) or personally delivered a true copy ofthe foregoing Order addressed to:

Counsel for Respondent Carlene V. Mcintyre, Assistant General Counsel Arnold D. Kolikoff, Attorney Faith Tabafunda, Attorney LawDepartment THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORKAND NEW JERSEY !50 Greenwich Street, 25th Floor NewYork, NY I0006 Counsel for Complainant Marc L. Warren, Esq. Keith J. Harrison, Esq. Gerald F. Murphy, Esq. Steven J. Seiden, Esq. CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Robert S. Span, Esq. Alan 

### K. Steinbrecher, Esq. Sophy Chen, Esq. STEINBRECHER & SPAN LLP 1155 F Street, N.W., Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20004

Hand-Deliveredto: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-600) 

### FA A 

### Office Gf A

### irpGrt CGmp!ianGe ana Managemelli: Aflalysis, AGO 

### 100

Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12321]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of approval of amendment to Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act 
(IGRA), Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior 
shall publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved Tribal-State 
Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on 
Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, Department of 
the Interior, through his delegated authority, has approved an 
Amendment, executed on May 2, 2000, to the Gaming Compact between the 
Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana and the State of Louisiana.

DATES: This action is effective May 16, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 
20240, (202) 219-4066.

    Dated: May 4, 2000.
Levin Gover,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 00-12321 Filed 5-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
```
**Exhibit 21****LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES****SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**         **State of****Name** **Segment** **Incorporation**Dee Zee, Inc. Automotive OhioE. O. Brody Company Glassware & Candles OhioIndiana Glass Company Glassware & Candles IndianaJackson Plastics Operations, Inc.* Automotive OhioKoneta, Inc.* Automotive OhioLaGrange Molded Products, Inc. Automotive DelawareLancaster Colony Commercial Products, Inc. Glassware & Candles OhioLancaster Glass Corporation Glassware & Candles OhioT. Marzetti Company Specialty Foods OhioMarzetti Frozen Pasta, Inc. (FKA Reames Foods, Inc.)* Specialty Foods IowaNew York Frozen Foods, Inc.* Specialty Foods OhioPretty Products, Inc. Automotive OhioSister Schubert’s Homemade Rolls, Inc.* Specialty Foods AlabamaThe Quality Bakery Company, Inc.* Specialty Foods OhioAll subsidiaries conduct their business under the names shown.
* Indicates indirect subsidiary
[No. 20754-4-III.

Division Three.

December 31, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Randolph Lee Blackbird, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 00-1-02427-5, Paul A. Bastine, J., entered December 18, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, C.J., concurred in by Sweeney and Schultheis, JJ.
#### § 38.68 Failing to show cause.

If the recipient fails to show cause why enforcement proceedings should not be initiated, the Director may follow the enforcement procedures outlined in § 38.95.
exh4_1.htm


 










Exhibit 4.1


 





 


 



Puke Cycle Corporation INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO SEE REVERSE                      FOR           CERTAIN                      DEFINITIONS



FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF 1/3 of $.01 PAR VALUE EACH OF  transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by attorney upon surrender of this certificate duly endorsed or assigned. This certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Colorado, and to the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Corporation, as now or hereafter amended. This certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent. WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. Secretary President Dated COUNTERSIGNED: Corporate Seal 2007 Colorado


Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc. 1717 Arch St. STE 1300 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Transfer Agent
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
       ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



This 12th day of November, 2004.



                                              /s/ Charles M. Jones, III
                                              -------------------------
                                              Charles M. Jones, III
                                              Chief Executive Officer


                                              /s/ David J. Baranko
                                              --------------------
                                              David J. Baranko
                                              Chief Financial Officer


                                       19
Exhibit 10.1


 





PROMISSORY NOTE


OF 


CELL SOURCE, INC.


 


	NOTE NO. BTB___	March     , 2015


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED,
the undersigned, Cell Source, Inc. a corporation with its principal office located at 65 Yigal Alon Street, Tel Aviv Israel 67433
(the “Company” or the “Maker”), hereby unconditionally promises to pay to ________________
whose address is __________________________ or the registered assignee, upon presentation of this Promissory Note (the “Note”)
by the registered holder hereof (the “Registered Holder” or Holder”) at the office of the Company,
the amount of $__________ (“Principal Amount”) and other sums as hereinafter provided, subject to the terms
and conditions as forth below. The effective date of execution and issuance of this Note is ___________ (“Original Issuance
Date”).


 


PAYMENT OF PRINCIPAL
AMOUNT. The duration of the note shall be 12 months, with the principal amount of this Note due and payable on or before March
26, 2016.


 


INTEREST. This
Note shall not bear interest.


 


PREPAYMENT.
This Note may be prepaid in whole or in part. Thereafter, the Maker shall have the right at any time and from time to time to prepay
this Note in whole or in part without premium or penalty.


 


MANDATORY PREPAYMENT.
This Note must be prepaid in whole from the proceeds of any closing occurring after the Original Issuance Date of any offering
or offerings of securities of the Company pursuant to which the aggregate gross proceeds received by the Company is greater than
or equal to $3,000,000.


 


REMEDIES. No
delay or omission on part of the holder of this Note in exercising any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any such right
or of any other right of such holder, nor shall any delay, omission or waiver on any one occasion be deemed a bar to or waiver
of the same or any other right on any future occasion. The rights and remedies of the Holder shall be cumulative and may be pursued
singly, successively, or together, in the sole discretion of the Holder.


 


EXPENSES. In
the event any payment under this Note is not paid when due, the Maker agrees to pay, in addition to the principal and interest
hereunder, reasonable attorneys’ fees not exceeding a sum equal to five percent (5%) of the then outstanding balance owing
on the Note, plus all other reasonable expenses incurred by Holder in exercising any of its rights and remedies upon default.


 


GOVERNING LAW.
This Note shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York.


 


SUCCESSORS.
All of the foregoing is the promise of Maker and shall bind Maker and Maker’s successors, heirs and assigns; provided, however,
that Maker may not assign any of its rights or delegate any of its obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the
Holder.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 




    	1



    	 



    

 


[Signature Page to Promissory Note]


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Maker has executed this Promissory Note as of the Original Issuance Date written above.


 


 


	 	Cell Source, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	Name: Itamar Shimrat
	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer


 


 








    	2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BOYD'S
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF, AND FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,731
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                       459
<INVENTORY>                                     17,157
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,352
<PP&E>                                           6,201
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,289
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 273,454
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,562
<BONDS>                                        225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      (67,451)
<OTHER-SE>                                     111,343
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   273,454
<SALES>                                         91,479
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,479
<CGS>                                           33,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,681
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,453
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,094
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,793
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,301
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    354
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,947
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41


</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IDEAL INDUSTRIES LIGHTING LLC, dba Cree 

Lighting, 

Appellant

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, 

Appellee

RAB LIGHTING INC.,

Intervenor

-------------------------------------------------

RAB LIGHTING INC.,

Appellant 

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, 

Appellee

______________________

2022-1484, 2022-1501

______________________

Case: 22-1484 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 03/29/2022
2 IDEAL INDUSTRIES LIGHTING LLC V. ITC

Appeals from the United States International Trade 

Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-1213.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceedings are DISMISSED under Fed. R. 

App. P. 42 (b).

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

March 29, 2022

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: March 29, 2022

Case: 22-1484 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 03/29/2022
[No. 27680-1-II.

Division Two.

November 1, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Scott James Yoder, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kitsap County, No. 01-1-00417-2, Jay B. Roof and M. Karlynn Haberly, JJ., entered August 7, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J., concurred in by Morgan and Armstrong, JJ.