alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE INFORMATION IN THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF REGISTRANT AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD
INDICATED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THOSE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          81,955
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  262,268
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,000
<INVENTORY>                                    151,189
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               495,412
<PP&E>                                       1,127,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                 976,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 791,704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          514,393
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       419,667
<OTHER-SE>                                    (177,444)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   791,704
<SALES>                                      1,084,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,084,181
<CGS>                                          503,780
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  503,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               763,775
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,282
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,282
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

AMUR FINANCE COMPANY, INC. §

and AMUR FINANCE IV LLC, § No. 7, 2018

§

Defendant s

- Below, § Court Below

— Court of Chancery

Appellant s

, § of the State of Delaware

§

v. § No. 2017

- 0145

- JRS

§

PINE RIVER MASTER FUND LTD. §

and PINE RIVER FIXED INCOME §

MASTER FUND LTD., §

§

Plaintiff s

- Below, §

Appellees

. §

Submitted: June 13, 2018

Decided: July 9 , 2018

Befor e VALIHURA

, SEITZ

, and TRAYNOR

, Justices.

O R D E R

This 9 th day of July 2018, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs

,

oral argument, and the record on appeal, it appears that the judgment of the Court

of Chancery should be af firmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its

October 12 , 2017 Memorandum Opinion

. 1

1 Justice Traynor concurs in the judgment, but on a different reading of the Credit

Agreement than the Court of Chancery ’s . In his view, Amur Finance IV’s periodic transfers to

Amur Finance Company of dividends it received on shares of a third

- party company that Am ur

Finance Company had given it to hold

— purportedly pursuant to an agreement the two

companies negotiated prior to the Credit Agreement

— were not, as the Court of Chancery said,

prohibited “distributions in respect of [Amur Finance IV’s] equity interests” w ithin the meaning

of § 5.07(d) of the Credit Agreement or prohibited “transactions” with an affiliate within the

meaning of § 5.07(f), but rather were prohibited “payments” to an affiliate under § 5.07(f).2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of

Chancery be AFFIRMED

.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
(80 South. 895)

#### CITY OF MOBILE v. RUSH.

(1 Div. 288.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 14, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; Claude A. Grayson, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 22 - 00078 - CR EX PARTE RODGER CLAYCOMB, RELATOR

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

### November 22 , 2022 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. In light of the Opinion issued November 22, 2022 in Ex parte Claycomb , No. 07 - 20 - 00238 - CR, R elator’s writ of pro hibi tion and this Court’s Order on Motion for Emergency Stay issued in Ex parte Claycomb , 07 - 22 - 00078 - CR on April 1, 2022, are hereby rendered moot. Therefore, R elator’s writ and motion are both dismissed.

Lawrence M. Doss Justice Do not publish.
§ 4206.8 Reduction of credit for abatement or other reduction of prior partial withdrawal liability. ( a ) *General.* If an employer's withdrawal liability for a prior partial withdrawal has been reduced or waived, the credit determined pursuant to §§ 4206.4 through 4206.7 shall be adjusted in accordance with this section.
( b ) *Computation.* The adjusted credit is calculated by multiplying the credit determined under the preceding sections of this part by a fraction— ( 1 ) The numerator of which is the excess of the total partial withdrawal liability of the employer for all partial withdrawals in prior years (excluding those partial withdrawals for which the credit is zero) over the present value of each abatement or other reduction of that prior withdrawal liability calculated as of the date on which that prior partial withdrawal liability was determined; and
( 2 ) The denominator of which is the total partial withdrawal liability of the employer for all partial withdrawals in prior years (excluding those partial withdrawals for which the credit is zero).
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Goldrich Mining Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William V. Schara, Chief Executive Officer, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Goldrich Mining Company.







/s/ William V. Schara

DATE:  April 14, 2014

William V. Schara, Chief Executive Officer and President





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Goldrich Mining Company and will be retained by Goldrich Mining Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

                                Certification Of
                      President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, the undersigned, Derek L. Caldwell, who is the
President and Chief Executive Officer of Lincoln International Corporation (the
"company"), hereby certifies that the company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended July 31, 2005, (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of ss.13(a) or ss.15(d) as applicable, of the Securities Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
company.

                                   /s/ Derek L. Caldwell
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Derek L. Caldwell
                                   Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
                                   Date:  October 28, 2005
#### STATE v CHALIKER STATE v JERKOVICH

Ohio Supreme Court

Nos 22031 & 32.

Decided March 5, 1930

Kinkade, Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the date and for
the periods expressed in the Report.
 By:
    
    /s/ John B. Gerlach, Jr.John B. Gerlach, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerAugust 26, 2009By:
    
    /s/ John L. BoylanJohn L. BoylanChief Financial OfficerAugust 26, 2009
§ 37.37 What are a recipient's responsibilities to collect and maintain data and other information? ( a ) The Director will not require submission of data that can be obtained from existing reporting requirements or sources, including those of other agencies, if the source is known and available to the Director.
( b ) ( 1 ) Each recipient must collect such data and maintain such records, in accordance with procedures prescribed by the Director, as the Director finds necessary to determine whether the recipient has complied or is complying with the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIA or this part. The system and format in which the records and data are kept must be designed to allow the Governor and CRC to conduct statistical or other quantifiable data analyses to verify the recipient's compliance with section 188 of WIA and this part.
( 2 ) Such records must include, but are not limited to, records on applicants, registrants, eligible applicants/registrants, participants, terminees, employees, and applicants for employment. Each recipient must record the race/ethnicity, sex, age, and where known, disability status, of every applicant, registrant, eligible applicant/registrant, participant, terminee, applicant for employment, and employee. Such information must be stored in a manner that ensures confidentiality, and must be used only for the purposes of recordkeeping and reporting; determining eligibility, where appropriate, for WIA Title I-financially assisted programs or activities; determining the extent to which the recipient is operating its WIA Title I-financially assisted program or activity in a nondiscriminatory manner; or other use authorized by law.
( c ) Each recipient must maintain, and submit to CRC upon request, a log of complaints filed with it that allege discrimination on the ground(s) of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, political affiliation or belief, citizenship, and/or participation in a WIA Title I-financially assisted program or activity. The log must include: the name and address of the complainant; the ground of the complaint; a description of the complaint; the date the complaint was filed; the disposition and date of disposition of the complaint; and other pertinent information. Information that could lead to identification of a particular individual as having filed a complaint must be kept confidential.
( d ) Where designation of individuals by race or ethnicity is required, the guidelines of the Office of Management and Budget must be used.
( e ) A service provider's responsibility for collecting and maintaining the information required under this section may be assumed by the Governor or LWIA grant recipient, as provided in the State's Methods of Administration.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Joseph E. Macharsky, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Boyds Collection,Ltd.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure control andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation, and

c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.
| /s/ Joseph  E. Macharsky |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| Joseph E. Macharsky           |
| *Chief Financial Officer*     |
| Date: August 16, 2004    |

 

1

----
(77 South. 1002)

#### CHAIRSELL v. SPENCER.

(6 Div. 359.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 27, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; John C. Pugh, Judge.

Wm. M. Spencer, Jr., of Birmingham, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000060128
<NAME>                        LOGIMETRICS
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1
<CURRENCY>                                              US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                    1
<CASH>                                             432,250
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,987,184
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (325,070)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,858,908
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,008,758
<PP&E>                                           2,858,099
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,308,790
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,653,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,551,609
<BONDS>                                          8,104,733
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                        924,525
<COMMON>                                           284,029
<OTHER-SE>                                      (7,928,423)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,653,870
<SALES>                                          8,872,105
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,872,105
<CGS>                                            7,122,954
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,837,326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   472,568
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,080,526
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,168,701)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (396,867)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,771,834)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,771,834)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.19)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




Return
      to Main
      Document





**EXPRESS
        SYSTEMS CORPORATION.**
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
        THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Express Systems Corporation. (the
        “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard
        Brown, Principal Accounting Officer, Principal Financial Officer,
        and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
        as
        adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
        my
        knowledge:
  
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
  2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
  
 
 /s/
        Richard Brown
 Richard
        Brown
 Principal
        Accounting Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Director
 August
        11, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 38 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 824
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 38

  Waiving certain provisions of the Trade Act of 1974 relating to the 
      appointment of a Deputy United States Trade Representative.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2008

Mr. Grassley introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

                             June 18, 2008

               Reported by Mr. Baucus, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Waiving certain provisions of the Trade Act of 1974 relating to the 
      appointment of a Deputy United States Trade Representative.

Whereas paragraph (3) of section 141(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
        2171(b)(3)) provides certain limitations with respect to the appointment 
        of the United States Trade Representative and Deputy United States Trade 
        Representatives;
Whereas Deanna Tanner Okun has provided significant public service to the United 
        States;
Whereas her years of public service include serving as an aide to a United 
        States Senator with responsibility for international trade and foreign 
        policy issues and, after appointment by the President and confirmation 
        by the Senate, as a Commissioner on the independent United States 
        International Trade Commission, including serving as Chairman of the 
        Commission; and
Whereas it is appropriate to waive the provisions of paragraph (3) of section 
        141(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to the appointment of 
        Deanna Tanner Okun as Deputy United States Trade Representative: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding the 
provisions of paragraph (3) of section 141(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 
(19 U.S.C. 2171(b)(3)) or any other provision of law, the President, 
acting by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, is authorized 
to appoint Deanna Tanner Okun as Deputy United States Trade 
Representative.

                                                       Calendar No. 824

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 38

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Waiving certain provisions of the Trade Act of 1974 relating to the 
      appointment of a Deputy United States Trade Representative.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 18, 2008

                       Reported without amendment
```
# EUR-Lex - 31998D0219 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998D0219

**98/219/EC: Commission Decision of 4 March 1998 amending Decision 97/467/EC on drawing up provisional lists of third country establishments from which the Member States authorise imports of rabbit meat and farmed game meat (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 082 , 19/03/1998 P. 0044 - 0046 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 4 March 1998 amending Decision 97/467/EC on drawing up provisional lists of third country establishments from which the Member States authorise imports of rabbit meat and farmed game meat (Text with EEA relevance) (98/219/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 95/408/EC of 22 June 1995 on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States are authorised to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs (1), as last amended by Council Decision 97/34/EC (2), and in particular Article 2(4) thereof,

Whereas provisional lists of establishments producing rabbit meat and farmed game meat have been drawn up by Commission Decision 97/467/EC (3) as last amended by Commission Decision 98/103/EC (4);

Whereas New Zealand and Croatia have sent a list of establishments producing rabbit meat and farmed game meat and for which the responsible authorities certify that the establishments are in accordance with Community rules;

Whereas a provisional list of establishments producing rabbit meat and farmed game meat can thus be drawn up for New Zealand and Croatia;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to this Decision is added to the Annex of Decision 97/467/EC.

Article 2

This Decision shall apply from 20 February 1998.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 March 1998.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 243, 11. 10. 1995, p. 17.

(2) OJ L 13, 16. 1. 1997, p. 33.

(3) OJ L 199, 26. 7. 1997, p. 57.

(4) OJ L 25, 31. 1. 1998, p. 96.

ANEXO - BILAG - ANHANG - ÐÁÑÁÑÔÇÌÁ - ANNEX - ANNEXE - ALLEGATO - BIJLAGE - ANEXO - LIITE - BILAGA

'>TABLE>

'>TABLE>