alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 15, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Nancy E. CoyleNancy E. CoylePresident (Principal Executive Officer) Date: May 15, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Lonnie RothbortLonnie RothbortChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
§ 4003.54 Contents of appeal. ( a ) An appeal must— ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) Be clearly designated as an appeal;
( 3 ) Specifically explain why PBGC's determination is wrong and the result the appellant is seeking;
( 4 ) Describe the relevant information the appellant believes is known by PBGC, and summarize any other information the appellant believes is relevant. It is important to include copies of any documentation that support the appellant's claim or the appellant's assertions about this information;
( 5 ) State whether the appellant desires to appear in person or through a representative before the Appeals Board; and
( 6 ) State whether the appellant desires to present witnesses to testify before the Appeals Board, and if so, state why the presence of witnesses will further the decision-making process.
( b ) In any case where the appellant believes that another person may be aggrieved if PBGC grants the relief sought, the appeal must also include the name(s) and address(es) (if known) of such other person(s).
[61 FR 34012, July 1, 1996, as amended at 73 FR 38120, July 3, 2008; 85 FR 10284, Feb. 24, 2020]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 107 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 107

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) Members of Congress (or any employee of a Member of 
        Congress authorized by that Member) should not be prohibited, 
        with or without prior notice to the Architect of the Capitol, 
        the Chief Executive Officer for Visitor Services, or the 
        Capitol Guide Service, from taking guests or visitors into the 
        publicly accessible areas of the United States Capitol complex 
        during normal business hours;
            (2) nothing in this resolution shall be construed to affect 
        the authority granted to employees of Members of Congress by 
        the respective Members relating to the movement of such 
        employees through the United States Capitol complex;
            (3) at the direction of the Capitol Police Board or the 
        fire marshal, the taking of guests or visitors into the 
        publicly accessible areas of the United States Capitol complex 
        by a Member of Congress (or any employee of a Member of 
        Congress authorized by that Member) should be temporarily 
        suspended or otherwise subject to restriction for safety or 
        security reasons to the same extent as guided tours of the 
        United States Capitol complex which are led by the Architect of 
        the Capitol or the Capitol Guide Service; and
            (4) nothing in this resolution shall be interpreted to 
        contradict the Congressional staff-led tour policy that ensures 
        that tours of the Capitol are conducted by staff members who 
        have undergone mandatory life safety and historical accuracy 
        training.

            Passed the Senate December 11 (legislative day, December 
      10), 2008.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 107

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the rights of Members of 
 Congress (or any employee of a Member of Congress authorized by that 
      Member) to lead tours of the United States Capitol complex.
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 95 (Friday, May 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28587-28588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11383]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

37th Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 206, Aeronautical 
Information and Meteorological Data Link Services

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 206, Aeronautical 
Information and Meteorological Data Link Services.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
thirty-seventh meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 206, Aeronautical 
Information and Meteorological Data Link Services.

DATES: The meeting will be held June 9-13, 2014, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1150 18th St. NW., Suite 
910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-
0652/(202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 206. The agenda will 
include the following:

June 9

     Opening remarks: DFO, Chairman, and Host
     Attendees' introductions
     Review and approval of meeting agenda
     Action item review
     Approval of previous (Kansas City) meeting minutes
     Sub-Groups' status and week's plan
     Industry presentations
     First Wake Vortex Tiger Team Meeting Debrief
     WG-76 Meeting Debrief
     Sub-Group meetings

June 10

     Sub-Groups meetings
     SG6: SE2020 Eddy Dissipation Rate (EDR) Turbulence Project 
Update Plenary

[[Page 28588]]

June 11

     Sub-Group Meetings

June 12

     SG-4 DO-252 FRAC Resolution
     Sub-Group Meetings
     SG-4 DO-252 FRAC Resolution (if needed)

June 13

     Sub-Groups' reports
     Decision to Approve DO-252 Update for PMC Review
     Action item review
     Future meeting plans and dates
     Industry coordination and presentations
     Other business
     Adjourn
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 8, 2014.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-11383 Filed 5-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
§ 4281.16 Benefit valuation methods—plans closing out. ( a ) *Applicability.* For purposes of the annual valuation required by section 4281(b) of ERISA, the plan sponsor shall value the plan's benefits in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section if,— ( 1 ) *Plans closed out before valuation.* Before the time when the valuation is performed, the plan has satisfied in full all liabilities for payment of nonforfeitable benefits, in a manner consistent with the terms of the plan and applicable law, by the purchase of one or more nonparticipating irrevocable commitments from one or more insurers, with respect to all benefits payable as annuities, and by the payment of single-sum cash distributions, with respect to benefits not payable as annuities; or
( 2 ) *Plans to be closed out after valuation.* As of the time when the valuation is performed, the plan sponsor reasonably expects that the plan will close out before the next annual valuation date and the plan sponsor has a currently exercisable bid or bids to provide the irrevocable commitment(s) described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section and the total cost of the irrevocable commitment(s) under the bid, plus the total amount of the single-sum cash distributions described in paragraph (a)(1), does not exceed the value of the plan's assets, exclusive of outstanding claims for withdrawal liability, as determined under this subpart.
( b ) *Valuation rule.* The present value of nonforfeitable benefits under this section is the total amount of single-sum cash distributions made or to be made plus the cost of the irrevocable commitment(s) purchased or to be purchased in order to satisfy in full all liabilities of the plan for nonforfeitable benefits.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                        3,417,919
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1,372,710
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (30,050)
<INVENTORY>                                     628,530
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              5,534,041
<PP&E>                                        3,059,559
<DEPRECIATION>                               (1,482,299)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                7,135,445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         1,906,657
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                     13,922,875
<OTHER-SE>                                   (8,694,087)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  7,135,445
<SALES>                                         102,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                102,434
<CGS>                                               369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 2,158,406
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1,995,708)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1,995,708)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (1,161,870)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (3,157,578)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.17)



</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 12, 2018

a0905

Order 

Clerk

September 12, 2018

156229

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 156229

COA: 337618

Wayne CC: 00-012692-FC

LARRY HEARNS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 27, 2017 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
§ 23.520 Debarment proceedings. ( a ) Whenever any contractor is found by the Secretary of Labor to have disregarded its obligations to workers or subcontractors under Executive Order 14026 or this part, such contractor and its responsible officers, and any firm, corporation, partnership, or association in which such contractor or responsible officers have an interest, shall be ineligible for a period of up to three years to receive any contracts or subcontracts subject to Executive Order 14026 from the date of publication of the name or names of the contractor or persons on the ineligible list.
( b ) ( 1 ) Whenever the Administrator finds reasonable cause to believe that a contractor has committed a violation of Executive Order 14026 or this part which constitutes a disregard of its obligations to workers or subcontractors, the Administrator shall notify by certified mail to the last known address, the contractor and its responsible officers (and any firms, corporations, partnerships, or associations in which the contractor or responsible officers are known to have an interest), of the finding. The Administrator shall afford such contractor and any other parties notified an opportunity for a hearing as to whether debarment action should be taken under Executive Order 14026 or this part. The Administrator shall furnish to those notified a summary of the investigative findings. If the contractor or any other parties notified wish to request a hearing as to whether debarment action should be taken, such a request shall be made by letter to the Administrator postmarked within 30 calendar days of the date of the investigative findings letter from the Administrator, and shall set forth any findings which are in dispute and the reasons therefor, including any affirmative defenses to be raised. Upon receipt of such timely request for a hearing, the Administrator shall refer the case to the Chief Administrative Law Judge by Order of Reference, to which shall be attached a copy of the investigative findings letter from the Administrator and the response thereto, for designation of an Administrative Law Judge to conduct such hearings as may be necessary to determine the matters in dispute.
( 2 ) Hearings under this section shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR part 6. If no hearing is requested within 30 calendar days of the letter from the Administrator, the Administrator's findings shall become the final order of the Secretary.
§ 1977.9 Complaints under or related to the Act. ( a ) Discharge of, or discrimination against, an employee because the employee has filed “any complaint * * * under or related to this Act * * *” is prohibited by section 11(c). An example of a complaint made “under” the Act would be an employee request for inspection pursuant to section 8(f). However, this would not be the only type of complaint protected by section 11(c). The range of complaints “related to” the Act is commensurate with the broad remedial purposes of this legislation and the sweeping scope of its application, which entails the full extent of the commerce power. (See Cong. Rec., vol. 116 p. P. 42206 Dec. 17, 1970).
( b ) Complaints registered with other Federal agencies which have the authority to regulate or investigate occupational safety and health conditions are complaints “related to” this Act. Likewise, complaints made to State or local agencies regarding occupational safety and health conditions would be “related to” the Act. Such complaints, however, must relate to conditions at the workplace, as distinguished from complaints touching only upon general public safety and health.
( c ) Further, the salutary principles of the Act would be seriously undermined if employees were discouraged from lodging complaints about occupational safety and health matters with their employers. (Section 2(1), (2), and (3)). Such complaints to employers, if made in good faith, therefore would be related to the Act, and an employee would be protected against discharge or discrimination caused by a complaint to the employer.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

AF 06-0090

_________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPOINTMENT OF 

A MEMBER TO THE COMMISSION ON 

PRACTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF 

THE STATE OF MONTANA

O R D E R

_________________

Rule 2 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement provides that 

appointments to the Commission on Practice shall be made by the Supreme Court from a 

list of three licensed and practicing attorneys submitted to the Court who have received the 

highest number of votes in an election by the Area resident members of the State Bar of 

Montana. Rule 2 further provides that this Court shall, by order, designate the time, place,

and method for the election of members for appointment to the Commission on Practice.

The term of the current attorney member for Area H expired May 31, 2024. Area 

H is now comprised of the Thirteenth and Twenty-Second Judicial Districts.

THEREFORE,

IT IS NOW ORDERED:

1. An election shall be had in Area H for nomination of three resident bar members 

whose names shall be submitted to this Court, and this Court shall then appoint one of the 

three to membership on the Commission on Practice.

2. The election in Area H shall be the responsibility of District Judge Brett D. 

Linneweber.

3. The election shall be conducted in the following manner:

(a) At the discretion of Judge Linneweber, the election may be conducted either by 

e-mail or regular mail. Whether by e-mail or regular mail, the ballots shall be in the 

following form:

06/03/2024

Case Number: AF 06-0090
2

AREA H

Thirteenth and Twenty-Second Judicial Districts

BALLOT FOR MEMBERS OF COMMISSION ON PRACTICE

(Vote for Three)

1. ____________________________________________________

2. ____________________________________________________

3. ____________________________________________________

The election will close June 21, 2024. Your ballot must be returned so as to 

reach its destination on or before that date. The names of the three attorneys 

receiving the highest number of votes will be sent to the Montana Supreme 

Court, which then will appoint one of them to the Commission.

********************

(b) Judge Linneweber shall prepare and distribute the ballots on or before June 10, 

2024.

(c) Voted ballots must be returned to Judge Linneweber or before June 18, 2024.

(d) The ballots are to be opened and counted by Judge Linneweber. Judge 

Linneweber shall then certify to this Court the names of the three attorneys in Area H

receiving the highest number of votes on or before June 24, 2024.

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Honorable Brett D. Linneweber, 

to each member of the Commission on Practice, and to Shelly Smith, Office Administrator 

for the Commission on Practice.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 3 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM REGISTRANT'S
FORM 10-KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         244,271
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,258,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (75,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,271,453
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,889,086
<PP&E>                                       2,316,597
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,920,187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,594,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,450,527
<BONDS>                                         23,094
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    990,564
<COMMON>                                        29,549
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,899,577)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,594,157
<SALES>                                      5,038,193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,038,193
<CGS>                                        7,953,237
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,995,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                70,720
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             410,021
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,437,862)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (299,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,138,862)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,138,862)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED




PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visualant, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald P. Erickson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.




This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Executive and Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.




/s/ Ronald P. Erickson


Ronald P. Erickson




Chief Executive Officer




August 10, 2012
33428 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 23, 2000 / Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES

ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND

SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Part 17

[FAR Case 99–004]

RIN 9000–AI42

Federal Acquisition Regulation;

Executive Agent

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD),

General Services Administration (GSA),

and National Aeronautics and Space

Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency

Acquisition Council and the Defense

Acquisition Regulations Council

(Councils) agreed to withdraw FAR case

99–004, Executive Agent, because it is

no longer necessary. The proposed rule

was published in the Federal Register at

64 FR 44100, August 12, 1999.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The

FAR Secretariat, Room 4035, GS

Building, Washington, DC 20405, (202)

501–4755 for information pertaining to

status or publication schedules. For

clarification of content, contact Mr.

Ralph De Stefano, Procurement Analyst,

at (202) 501–1758. Please cite FAR case

99–004, withdrawal.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

The rule which was published in the

Federal Register at 64 FR 44100, August

12, 1999, proposed amending FAR part

17 to add another example of an

interagency acquisition that is not

subject to the Economy Act. This rule is

being withdrawn because it is no longer

necessary.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 17

Government procurement.

Dated: May 17, 2000.

Edward C. Loeb,

Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division.

[FR Doc. 00–12868 Filed 5–22–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820–EP–U