### 28571 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules

aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. 8. Taking of Private Property

This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform

This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks

We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. 12. Energy Effects

This proposed rule is not a ‘‘significant energy action’’ under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023–01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a special local regulation involving a high media event and the potential for high boating traffic. This rule is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(h) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated under **ADDRESSES** . We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, and Waterways.

For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the U.S. Coast Guard proposes to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

**PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERWAYS** 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.

■ 2. Section 100.35T08–0219 is added to read as follows:

**§ 100.35T08–0219 Special Local Regulation; Ohio River, Miles 469.5 to 471.2,**  **Cincinnati, OH.**

(a) Location. The following area is a special local regulation: All waters of the Ohio River, beginning at mile marker 469.5 to mile 471.2 at Cincinnati, OH.

(b) Enforcement date. This section is enforceable from: July 10, 2015 through July 14, 2015.

Dated: April 22, 2015.
R.V. Timme, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2015–12122 Filed 5–18–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 9110–04–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**  **AGENCY**

**40 CFR Part 60**

**[EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0174; FRL–9927–80– OAR]** 

**RIN 2060–AP63**

**Electronic Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements for New**  **Source Performance Standards; Extension of Comment Period** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule; extension of public comment period.

**SUMMARY :**  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing that the period for providing public comments on the March 20, 2015, proposed ‘‘Electronic Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements for New Source Performance Standards’’ is being extended by 30 days.

**DATES :**  Comments. The public comment period for the proposed rule published March 20, 2015 (80 FR 15100), is being extended by 30 days to June 18, 2015, in order to provide the public additional time to submit comments and supporting information.

**ADDRESSES :**  Comments. Written comments on the proposed rule may be submitted to the EPA electronically, by mail, by facsimile or through hand delivery/courier. Please refer to the proposal (80 FR 15100) for the addresses and detailed instructions.

Docket. Publicly available documents relevant to this action are available for public inspection either electronically at http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA Docket Center, EPA WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20004. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. A reasonable fee may be charged for copying. The EPA has established the official public docket for this rulemaking under Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0174.

World Wide Web. The EPA Web site containing information for this rulemaking is at http://www.epa.gov/ ttn/atw/eparules.html.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Ms. Gerri Garwood, Measurement Policy Group (MPG), Sector Policies and Programs Division (D243–05), Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, telephone number: (919) 541–


### 28572 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules

2406; fax number: (919) 541–1039; and email address: garwood.gerri@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
Comment Period

After considering a request submitted by the Air Permitting Forum to extend the public comment period, the EPA has decided to extend the public comment period for an additional 30 days. Therefore, the public comment period will end on June 18, 2015, rather than May 19, 2015. This extension will ensure that the public has sufficient time to review and comment on all of the information available, including the proposed rule and other materials in the docket.

Dated: May 8, 2015. Stephen D. Page,

Director.
[FR Doc. 2015–12100 Filed 5–18–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE**

**National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration** 

**50 CFR Part 300**

**[Docket No. 130722646–5430–02]**

**RIN 0648–BD54**

**International Fisheries; Pacific Tuna Fisheries; Establishment of Tuna**  **Vessel Monitoring System in the Eastern Pacific Ocean** 

**AGENCY :**  National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

**ACTION :**  Supplemental proposed rule; request for comments.

**SUMMARY :**  NMFS revises a proposed rule published on February 6, 2014, to implement Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) Resolution C–04–06. Under the original proposed rule Vessel Monitoring Systems (VMS) would be required for any U.S. commercial fishing vessels that are 24 meters (78.74 feet) or more in overall length and used to target tuna in the eastern Pacific Ocean. After publication of the proposed rule on February 6, 2014, the IATTC adopted Resolution C– 14–02, which expands the applicability of the VMS requirements to vessels engaged in fishing activities for either tuna or tuna-like species; this action would implement that expanded application. This action would also revise the original proposed rule by allowing additional conditions to authorize a vessel owner or operator to shut down a VMS unit, and in a few non-substantive ways as described below. This rule is intended to ensure full U.S. compliance with its international obligations under the IATTC Convention.

**DATES :**  Written comments on this supplemental proposed rule must be received on or before June 18, 2015.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments on this document, identified by NOAA– NMFS–2013–0117, by any of the following methods:

• Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to www.regulations.gov/ #!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2013- 0117, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments.

• Mail: Submit written comments to Rachael Wadsworth, NMFS West Coast Region, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802. Include the identifier ‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2013–0117’’ in the comments.

• Public Hearing: The public is welcome to attend a public hearing and offer comments on this supplemental proposed rule from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. PST, June 9, 2015, at 501 W. Ocean Boulevard, Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802. The public may also participate in the public hearing via conference line: 888–790–6181; participant passcode: 64120.

Instructions: Comments must be submitted by one of the above methods to ensure they are received, documented, and considered by NMFS. Comments sent by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period, may not be considered. All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying information ( e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential business information, or otherwise sensitive or protected information. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous).

Copies of the draft Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) and other supporting documents prepared for the original proposed rule are available via the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov, docket NOAA– NMFS–2013–0117 or by contacting the Regional Administrator, William W. Stelle, Jr., NMFS West Coast Region, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Bldg 1, Seattle, WA 98115–0070 or by email to RegionalAdministrator.WCRHMS@
noaa.gov.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Rachael Wadsworth, NMFS West Coast Region, 562–980–4036.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  NMFS published a proposed rule in the Federal Register (79 FR 7152) on February 6, 2014, to broaden the existing Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) requirements in the Pacific Ocean and to clarify the applicability of VMS requirements to U.S. commercial fishing vessels, 24 meters (78.74 feet) or more in overall length, used to target tuna (i.e., any fish of the genus Thunnus or of the species Euthynnus (Katsuwonus) pelamis (skipjack tuna)) in the waters of the Convention Area. The Convention Area is bounded by the west coast of the Americas and on the north, south, and west respectively, by the 50 ° N. and 50 ° S. parallels, and the
150 ° W. meridian. The original proposed rule was intended to ensure full U.S. implementation of Resolution C–04–06, adopted by the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) at its 72nd Meeting in June 2004.

After publication of the original proposed rule, the IATTC adopted Resolution C–14–02 at its 87th Meeting in July 2014, which amends and replaces Resolution C–04–06. This supplemental proposed rule revises the applicability of the VMS requirements to reflect Resolution C–14–02 and updates other sections of the regulatory text that was published in the original proposed rule. The regulatory text of the original proposed rule is republished in this supplemental proposed rule with the changes described above and in more detail below. Background and Need for Action

A detailed description of the original proposed rule was published in the preamble to that rule, which is available online (https://federalregister.gov/a/
2014-02598) and from NMFS (see

**ADDRESSES**). The VMS requirements from the original proposed rule are briefly summarized here.

Commercial fishing vessels that are 24 meters or more in overall length are required to install, activate, carry and operate VMS units (also known as ‘‘mobile transmitting units’’). The VMS units and mobile communicationsservice providers must be typeapproved by NOAA for fisheries in the IATTC Convention Area. Information for current NOAA type-approved VMS units can be obtained from: NOAA,