alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3.4 Submission of certified payroll and the preservation and inspection of weekly payroll records. ( a ) *Certified payroll.* Each certified payroll required under § 3.3 must be delivered by the contractor or subcontractor, within 7 days after the regular payment date of the payroll period, to a representative at the site of the building or work of the agency contracting for or financing the work, or, if there is no representative of the agency at the site of the building or work, the statement must be delivered by mail or by any other means normally assuring delivery by the contractor or subcontractor, within that 7 day time period, to the agency contracting for or financing the building or work. After the certified payrolls have been reviewed in accordance with the contracting or sponsoring agency's procedures, such certified payrolls must be preserved by the agency for a period of 3 years after all the work on the prime contract is completed and must be produced for inspection, copying, and transcription by the Department of Labor upon request. The certified payrolls must also be transmitted together with a report of any violation, in accordance with applicable procedures prescribed by the United States Department of Labor.
( b ) *Recordkeeping.* Each contractor or subcontractor must preserve the regular payroll records for a period of 3 years after all the work on the prime contract is completed. The regular payroll records must set out accurately and completely the name; Social Security number; last known address, telephone number, and email address of each laborer and mechanic; each worker's correct classification(s) of work actually performed; hourly rates of wages paid (including rates of contributions or costs anticipated for bona fide fringe benefits or cash equivalents thereof); daily and weekly number of hours actually worked in total and on each covered contract; deductions made; and actual wages paid. The contractor or subcontractor must make such regular payroll records, as well as copies of the certified payrolls provided to the contracting or sponsoring agency, available at all times for inspection, copying, and transcription by the contracting officer or their authorized representative, and by authorized representatives of the Department of Labor.
[88 FR 57730, Aug. 23, 2023]
§ 2580.412-20 Use of existing bonds, separate bonds and additional bonding. ( a ) *Additional bonding.* Section 13 neither prevents additional bonding beyond that required by its terms, nor prescribes the form in which additional coverage may be taken. Thus, so long as a particular bond meets the requirements of the regulations in this part as to the persons required to be bonded and provides coverage for such persons in at least the minimum required amount, additional coverage as to persons or amount may be taken in any form, either on the same or separate bond.
( b ) *Use of existing bonds.* Insofar as a bond currently in use is adequate to meet the requirements of the Act and the regulations in this part or may be made adequate to meet these requirements through rider, modification or separate agreement between the parties, no further bonding is required.
( c ) *Use of separate bonds.* The choice of whether persons required to be bonded should be bonded separately or under the same bond, whether given plans should be bonded separately or under the same bond, whether existing bonds should be used or separate bonds for Welfare and Pension Plans Disclosure Act bonding should be obtained, or whether the bond is underwritten by a single surety company or more than one surety company, either separately or on a cosurety basis, is left to the judgment of the parties concerned, so long as the bonding program adopted meets the requirements of the Act and the regulations in this part.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust VI and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding VI, L.P. (the
"Partnership") for the period ended April 1, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kathleen Skero, Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General Partner of
the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING VI, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ KATHLEEN SKERO
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Kathleen Skero *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: May 12, 2005
_____________________

*  Kathleen Skero functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Fővárosi Bíróság (Hungary) by order of that court of 24 June 2004 in the criminal proceedings against Attila Vajnai

(Case C-328/04)

(2004/C 262/27)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Fővárosi Bíróság, Hungary, of 24 June 2004, received at the Court Registry on 30 July 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the criminal proceedings against Attila Vajnai on the following question:

Is Article 269/B, first paragraph, of the Büntető Törvénykönyv (Hungarian Criminal Code), which provides that a person who uses or displays, in public, the symbol consisting of a five-pointed red star commits — where the conduct does not amount to a more serious criminal offence — a minor offence, compatible with the fundamental Community-law principle of non-discrimination? Do Article 6 TEU, according to which the Union is founded on the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, Directive 2000/43/EC (1), which also refers to fundamental freedoms, and Articles 10, 11 and 12 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, allow a person who wishes to express his political convictions through a symbol representing them to do so in any Member State?

----

(1)  OJ L 180, p. 22.

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 99 (Monday, May 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32099-32100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12708]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than June 5, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Betsy Buttrill White, Senior 
Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. National Bank of Greece, S.A., Athens, Greece; to acquire NBG 
Asset Management Inc. and NBG Securities Inc., both of New York, New 
York, and thereby indirectly acquire through NBG International Limited, 
London, England, indirect control of Newbrook Group LLC, New Brook 
Capital Management, Inc., Newbrook Capital Management LLC, and Newbrook 
Securities LLC, and thereby engage in investment advisory activities, 
pursuant to Sec. 225.28(b)(6) of Regulation Y; brokerage, riskless 
principal, and private placement activities, pursuant to 
Secs. 225.28(b)(7)(i), (ii) and (iii) of Regulation Y, respectively; 
and private investment fund activities, including acting as a commodity 
pool operator for and controlling private investment funds that invest 
solely in assets that a bank holding company is permitted to hold

[[Page 32100]]

directly, see Travelers Group, Inc., and Citicorp, 84 Fed. Res. Bull. 
985 (1998).

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 16, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-12708 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Charles Luciano, Thomas Pennochio, David Betillo, James Frederico, Abraham Wahrman and Ralph Liguori, Appellants.

Submitted October 4, 1937;

decided October 6, 1937.

*William Copeland Dodge, District Attorney (Thomas E. Dewey*and *Stanley H. Fuld*of counsel), for motion.

*Martin Conboy, David Asch, F. W. H. Adams, Moses Polakoff, George Morton Levy, Samuel Hassen, Joseph Selman*and *Lorenzo C. Carlino*opposed.

*548Motion to eliminate the supplemental record and to dismiss appeal granted to this extent: Motion to eliminate from the record on appeal all proceedings upon the motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence is granted. This court has no power to review the discretionary order made on such motion except in cases of murder in the first degree.
§ 36.510 Recruitment. ( a ) *Nondiscriminatory recruitment and hiring.* A recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in the recruitment and hiring of employees. Where a recipient has been found to be presently discriminating on the basis of sex in the recruitment or hiring of employees, or has been found to have so discriminated in the past, the recipient shall recruit members of the sex so discriminated against so as to overcome the effects of such past or present discrimination.
( b ) *Recruitment patterns.* A recipient shall not recruit primarily or exclusively at entities that furnish as applicants only or predominantly members of one sex if such actions have the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 36.500 through 36.550.
#### Oswego River Realty Corporation et al., Appellants and Respondents, Impleaded with Another, *v.*Sweet Brothers Paper Manufacturing Company, Inc., Respondent and Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

Submitted April 19, 1937;

decided April 27, 1937.

Motion to amend the remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended so as to read as follows: “ Judgment of the Appellate Division modified to eliminate any adjudication of riparian ownership or water rights in the pool above the dam and as so modified affirmed, without costs.” (See 272 N. Y. 505.)
# EUR-Lex - 31997D0581 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31997D0581

**97/581/EC: Commission Decision of 25 July 1997 amending Decision 95/30/EC laying down special conditions governing imports of fishery and aquaculture products originating in Morocco (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 237 , 28/08/1997 P. 0026 - 0038 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 25 July 1997 amending Decision 95/30/EC laying down special conditions governing imports of fishery and aquaculture products originating in Morocco (Text with EEA relevance) (97/581/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), as last amended by Directive 95/71/EC (2), and in particular Article 11 (5) thereof,

Whereas the list of establishments approved by Morocco for imports of fishery products into the Community is set out in Commission Decision 95/30/EC (3); whereas that list may be amended where a new list is forwarded by the competent Moroccan authorities;

Whereas the competent Moroccan authorities have forwarded a new list including in particular 305 freezer vessels;

Whereas the list of approved establishments and vessels must be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex B to Decision 95/30/EC is hereby replaced by the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 July 1997.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.

(2) OJ No L 332, 30. 12. 1995, p. 40.

(3) OJ No L 42, 24. 2. 1995, p. 32.

ANNEX

'ANNEX B

>TABLE>

>TABLE>

>TABLE>

>TABLE>
20 9 Nort h Eight h •^ . f-j-/^ . Marysville , Kansas6650 8 ;^'^j';^'PGRT.'^IIOi' ! ^'h ^ HOM E O F TH E BLAC KSQUIRRE L 

## CKETOPERATlO l

Sacrament o Telephon e 785-562-533 1 ---^x ^ Fax785-562-244 9 "^^. . Septembe r13 , 201 0 ^ ^ • : PON

YEXPRES

S COUhfTR

Y

MARYSVILL E " ^t . Josep h Susa n L . Kurlan d Assistan t Secretar yfo rAviatio n an d Internationa l Affair s U S Departmen t o f Transportatio n 

### W86-33 4 120 0 Ne wJerse yAve , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 RE : Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Progra m Application , DOCKE TDOT-OST-2010-0124 , Cit y o f Manhattan , K

S Dea rSecretar yKurland : O n behal f o f th e Cit yo fMarysville , I a m writin g i n suppor t o f th e Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Progra m Gran t fo rth e Manhatta n Regiona l Airpor t i n Manhattan , Kansas . Th e expansio n o f ai rservice s a t th e Manhatta n Regiona l Airpor t ha s bee n a grea t wa yfo rfamil yan d friend s wh o liv e fa rawa yt o trave l economicall yan d efficientl yfo rvisits . B yprovidin g acces s t o regiona l hub s lik e Dalla s o rChicago , th e Manhatta n Regiona l Airpor t ha s give n resident s an d companie s i n ou rare a a n economica l an d efficien t wa yt o trave l t o distan t cities . Th e ai rservic e expansio n ha s bee n a tremendou s boos t t o th e economi cdevelopmen t fo rou rrura l Community . Ou rCit yha s th e opportunit yt o utiliz e th e servic e fo rou rofficia l trave l t o quickl yge t t o ou rdestinations . W e hav e hear d man ypositiv e result s fro m thei rtrave l throug h th e Manhatta n Regiona l Airpor t an d believ e expandin g th e servic e wil l allo wmor e o f ou rregiona l resident s an d businesse s eve n greate r acces s t o je t ai rservice . However , i t i s importan t fo rth e Manhatta n Regiona l Airpor t t o buil d o n th e successe s o f th e first yea ro f expande d servic e b yreachin g ou t t o thos e withi n thi s largel yrura l are a aroun d Manhatta n t o mak e the m awar e o fth e trave l option s tha t exis t i n Manhattan . Fo rth e reason s I hav e outline d above , i t i s importan t t o bot h myself , ou rcommunity , an d thos e w e d o busines s wit h tha t thi s airpor t continu e t o gro wan d prospe ri n th e future . Sincerely ,

Cit yAdministrato r

Lette ro f jupport.do a
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for Special Committee (SC)-195 meeting to be held June 6-8, 2000, starting at 8:30 a.m. each day. The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.

The agenda will include:

### June 6

Plenary convenes for 30 minutes:

(1) Welcome and Introductions;

(2) Agenda Overview

(3) Working Group (WG) 1, Aircraft Cockpit Weather Display

1 p.m. Plenary Reconvenes

(4) Review of Previous Meeting Minutes

(5) Report from WG-1 on Activities;

(6) Review of FIS-B Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards (MASPS) section 4.0, Procedures for Performance Requirement Verification, Development

### June 7

(7) Review of FIS-B MASPS section 3.2.1, FIS Broadcast Network Interface and Appendix D, APDU Header Format

Detailed Review of FIS-B MASPS.

### June 8

(8) Continue Detailed Review of FIS-B MASPS

(9) Address Future Work

(10) Review Issues (Action Items)

(11) Date and Location of Next Meeting

(12) Other Business

(13) Closing.

Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

Issued in Washington, DC, on May 5, 2000.

Janice L. Peters,

Designated Official.

[FR Doc. 00-12169 Filed 5-12-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
110TH CONGRESS 

2ND SESSION S. CON. RES. 63

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas hydrocephalus is a serious neurological condition, 

characterized by the abnormal buildup of cerebrospinal 

fluids in the ventricles of the brain; 

Whereas there is no known cure for hydrocephalus; 

Whereas hydrocephalus affects an estimated 1,000,000 Americans; 

Whereas 1 or 2 in every 1,000 babies are born with hydrocephalus; 

Whereas over 375,000 older Americans have hydrocephalus, 

which often goes undetected or is misdiagnosed as dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, or Parkinson’s disease; 

Whereas with appropriate diagnosis and treatment, people 

with hydrocephalus are able to live full and productive 

lives; 

Whereas the standard treatment for hydrocephalus was developed in 1952, and carries multiple risks including shunt 

failure, infection, and overdrainage; 

Whereas there are fewer than 10 centers in the United States 

specializing in the treatment of adults with normal pressure hydrocephalus; 

Whereas each year, the people of the United States spend in 

excess of $1,000,000,000 to treat hydrocephalus; 
2

•SCON 63 ES 

Whereas a September 2005 conference sponsored by 7 institutes of the National Institutes of Health—‘‘Hydrocephalus: Myths, New Facts, Clear Directions’’—resulted 

in efforts to initiate new, collaborative research and treatment efforts; and 

Whereas the Hydrocephalus Association is one of the Nation’s oldest and largest patient and research advocacy 

and support networks for individuals suffering from hydrocephalus: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) Congress commends the Director of the Na4 tional Institutes of Health for working with leading 

5 scientists and researchers to organize the first-ever 

6 National Institutes of Health conference on hydro7 cephalus; and 

8 (2) it is the sense of Congress that—

9 (A) the Director of the National Institutes 

10 of Health should continue the current collabora11 tion with respect to hydrocephalus among the 

12 National Eye Institute, the National Human 

13 Genome Research Institute, the National Insti14 tute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, 

15 the National Institute of Child Health and 

16 Human Development, the National Institute of 

17 Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the Na-
3

•SCON 63 ES 

1 tional Institute on Aging, and the Office of 

2 Rare Diseases; 

3 (B) further research into the epidemiology, 

4 pathophysiology, disease burden, and improved 

5 treatment of hydrocephalus should be conducted 

6 or supported; and 

7 (C) public awareness and professional edu8 cation regarding hydrocephalus should increase 

9 through partnerships between the Federal Gov10 ernment and patient advocacy organizations. 

Passed the Senate January 22 (legislative day, January 3), 2008. 

Attest:

Secretary. 
110TH CONGRESS 

2ND SESSION S. CON. RES. 63

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the 

purposes.rological condition hydrocephalus, and for other need for additional research into the chronic neu-
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of James F. Nugent, as Executor of Joseph Fox, Deceased. James F. Nugent, as Executor, et al., Appellants; Mortimer May, as Special Guardian for Helen G. Fox, an Incompetent Person, et al., Respondents.

Argued October 1, 1937;

decided October 19, 1937.

*605
      *Walter H. Pickett*for Ætna Casualty and Surety Company, appellant.

*Mortimer May,*as special guardian, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent payable out of the estate of Joseph Fox, deceased, etc., and question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Herbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

38 39 40



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/21 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 21 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL