alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S. Con. Res. 45 Agreed to October 3, 2007

One Hundred Tenth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas the Ed Block Courage Award was established by Sam 

Lamantia in 1978 in honor of Ed Block, the head athletic trainer 

of the Baltimore Colts and a respected humanitarian;

Whereas each year in Baltimore, Maryland, the Foundation honors 

recipients from the National Football League who have been 

chosen by their teammates as exemplifying sportsmanship and 

courage;

Whereas the Ed Block Courage Award has become one of the 

most esteemed honors bestowed upon players in the NFL;

Whereas the Ed Block Courage Award Foundation has grown from 

a Baltimore-based local charity to the Courage House National 

Support Network for Kids operated in partnership with 17 NFL 

teams in their respective cities; and

Whereas Courage Houses are facilities that provide support and 

care for abused children and their families in these 17 locations 

across the country: Baltimore, Maryland, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Chicago, Illinois, Miami, Florida, Detroit, Michigan, Dallas, 

Texas, Westchester County, New York, Oakland, California, 

Seattle, Washington, Charlotte, North Carolina, Cleveland, Ohio, 

Atlanta, Georgia, St. Louis, Missouri, Indianapolis, Indiana, Buffalo, New York, San Francisco, California, and Minneapolis, Minnesota: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

(1) National Courage Month provides an opportunity to 

educate the people of the United States about the positive 

role that professional athletes can play as inspirations for America’s youth; and 
S. Con. Res. 45—2

(2) the Ed Block Courage Award Foundation should be 

recognized for its outstanding contributions toward helping 

those affected by child abuse. 

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

# AGENCY:

Department of Veterans Affairs.

# ACTION:

Notice of Intent to Enter into an Enhanced-Use Lease.

# SUMMARY:

The Secretary of VA intends to enter into an EUL on an 11.5-acre parcel of land at the Charlie Norwood VAMC. The selected lessee will finance, design, develop, renovate, manage, maintain and operate the EUL development. As consideration for the lease, the lessee will be required to renovate, operate, and maintain a transitional and permanent housing facility; provide preference and priority placement for homeless Veterans and Veterans at risk of homelessness; and provide a supportive services program that guides resident Veterans toward attaining long-term self-sufficiency.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Edward Bradley, Office of Asset Enterprise Management (044), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-7778 (this is not a toll-free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Title 38 U.S.C. 8161                     *et seq.*                     states that the Secretary may enter into an enhanced-use lease if he determines that implementation of a business plan proposed by the Under Secretary for Health for applying the consideration under such a lease for the provision of medical care and services would result in a demonstrable improvement of services to eligible Veterans in the geographic service-delivery area within which the property is located. This project meets this requirement.                

Approved: January 24, 2011.

John R. Gingrich, 

Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2011-2003 Filed 1-28-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
#### United States Hotel Co., Inc., Respondent, *v.*City of Saratoga Springs et al., Appellants.

Argued June 9, 1937;

decided July 13, 1937.

*522
      *Theodore A. Knapp*and *Francis E. Dorsey*for appellants.

*John A. Slade*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: Lehman and O’Brien, JJ.
§ 37.14 Under what circumstances may the Secretary delegate the responsibilities of this part? ( a ) The Secretary may from time to time assign to officials of other departments or agencies of the Government (with the consent of such department or agency) responsibilities in connection with the effectuation of the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIA and this part (other than responsibility for final decisions under § 37.112), including the achievement of effective coordination and maximum uniformity within the Department and within the executive branch of the Government in the application of the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIA or this part to similar programs and similar situations.
( b ) Any action taken, determination made, or requirement imposed by an official of another department or agency acting under an assignment of responsibility under this section has the same effect as if the action had been taken by the Director.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         8,029
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         50
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               3,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    37,850
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        74,832
<ALLOWANCE>                                    854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 135,448
<DEPOSITS>                                     97,557
<SHORT-TERM>                                   23,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            971
<LONG-TERM>                                    7,535
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1,993
<COMMON>                                       6,537
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,145)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 135,448
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                3,606
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1,350
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               52
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               5,008
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1,313
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,405
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2,603
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  90
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2,889
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                10
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (77)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.15)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.51
<LOANS-NON>                                    279
<LOANS-PAST>                                   77
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                2,333
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               871
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  214
<RECOVERIES>                                   107
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              854
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           814
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        40



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

P.B.B.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 378 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of October, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM OUR BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND OUR CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,1999 AS IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         324,392
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    814,773
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,175,371
<PP&E>                                         713,564
<DEPRECIATION>                                  98,023
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,291,068
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          797,982
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,000,000
<COMMON>                                       100,495
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,607,409)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,291,068
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,081,714
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,999
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,033,300)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,033,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,033,300)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 996 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2008 

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

AN ACT 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to expand passenger 

facility fee eligibility for certain noise compatibility projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

S 996 RFH

1 SECTION 1. EXPANDED PASSENGER FACILITY FEE ELIGI2 BILITY FOR NOISE COMPATIBILITY 

3 PROJECTS. 

4 Section 40117(b) of title 49, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(7) NOISE MITIGATION FOR CERTAIN

7 SCHOOLS.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In addition to the 

9 uses specified in paragraphs (1), (4), and (6), 

10 the Secretary may authorize a passenger facility 

11 fee imposed under paragraph (1) or (4) at a 

12 large hub airport that is the subject of an 

13 amended judgment and final order in con14 demnation filed on January 7, 1980, by the Su15 perior Court of the State of California for the 

16 county of Los Angeles, to be used for a project 

17 to carry out noise mitigation for a building, or 

18 for the replacement of a relocatable building 

19 with a permanent building, in the noise im20 pacted area surrounding the airport at which 

21 such building is used primarily for educational 

22 purposes, notwithstanding the air easement 

23 granted or any terms to the contrary in such 

24 judgment and final order, if— 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

S 996 RFH

1 ‘‘(i) the Secretary determines that the 

2 building is adversely affected by airport 

3 noise; 

4 ‘‘(ii) the building is owned or char5 tered by the school district that was the 

6 plaintiff in case number 986,442 or 

7 986,446, which was resolved by such judg8 ment and final order; 

9 ‘‘(iii) the project is for a school identi10 fied in 1 of the settlement agreements ef11 fective February 16, 2005, between the 

12 airport and each of the school districts; 

13 ‘‘(iv) in the case of a project to re14 place a relocatable building with a perma15 nent building, the eligible project costs are 

16 limited to the actual structural construc17 tion costs necessary to mitigate aircraft 

18 noise in instructional classrooms to an in19 terior noise level meeting current stand20 ards of the Federal Aviation Administra21 tion; and 

22 ‘‘(v) the project otherwise meets the 

23 requirements of this section for authoriza24 tion of a passenger facility fee. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
4 

S 996 RFH

1 ‘‘(B) ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS.—In sub2 paragraph (A)(iv), the term ‘eligible project 

3 costs’ means the difference between the cost of 

4 standard school construction and the cost of 

5 construction necessary to mitigate classroom 

6 noise to the standards of the Federal Aviation 

7 Administration.’’. 

Passed the Senate February 28, 2008. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1

                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


          We  consent to the  incorporation by reference  in the
          registration statement of Rymer  Foods Inc. on Form S-
          2 (File No. 33-86062) of  our report which includes an
          explanatory  paragraph  regarding the  uncertainty  of
          the Company's  ability to continue as a  going concern
          dated  December  12,  1997,   on  our  audits  of  the
          consolidated   financial   statements  and   financial
          statement   schedule   of   Rymer   Foods   Inc.   and
          subsidiaries as of the  one month period ended October
          25, 1997  and the eleven month period  ended September
          20, 1997, which report is included  on page 13 in this
          Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                                                
                                     /s/ Grant Thornton LLP     

          Chicago, Illinois              GRANT THORNTON LLP
          January 23, 1998
EXHIBIT 31
**CERTIFICATIONS**
     I, Hayne Hipp, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Liberty Corporation;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b.  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: March 2, 2005  /s/ Hayne Hipp     Hayne Hipp  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
55
Order entered February 25, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 20 - 01024 - CV BENNIE GAMBLE, SR., ET AL., Appellant s

V. ANE STHESIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.S.C. AND KENNE TH M. RICHTER, M.D. , Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 18 - 01764 - E

O RDER Before the Court is appellants’ February 24, 2021 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file their brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to March 8, 2021

. /s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
----

----

----

III Avviżi

Aġenzija Ewropea tad-Difiża

----

AVVIŻ TA’ POST BATTAL

L-Aġenzija Ewropea tad-Difiża bi ħsiebha tirrekluta:

Iktar informazzjoni (disponibbli bl-Ingliż) u l-formoli ta' applikazzjoni jistgħu jinkisbu mill-website tal-Kunsill fl-indirizz li ġej: http://ue.eu.int (kuntatti/offerti ta' mpjieg)

Limitu ta' żmien: L-1 ta' Ottubru 2004, it-timbru tal-posta jiġi meqjus bħala prova.

----
Exhibit 32.2

     Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 1350

     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Visual Bible International, Inc. (the "Company")for the period
ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Date: June 8, 2004


                                   Maurice Colson, Principal
                                   Executive Officer



     The foregoing certification accompanied the Quarterly Report on
Form 10QSB filing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is being
reproduced herein for information only.  It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company, whether made before or after hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.  A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained b y the
Company and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
AGREEMENT


        This Agreement is made on January 9, 1996, by and between Daniel J.
Terra; 990 Skokie Boulevard; Northbrook, Illinois 60062 ("Terra") and Lawter
International, Inc.; 990 Skokie Boulevard; Northbrook, Illinois 60062
("Lawter").

        Lawter desires to receive a "put" option from Terra and Terra is willing
to offer to Lawter a "put" for Idexx Laboratories, Inc. ("Idexx") common stock,
$.10 par value, under the terms and conditions set forth herein.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained
herein and the payment of ten dollars ($10.00) in hand paid to Terra, it is
hereby agreed as follows:

1.    Lawter intends to purchase in the open market sufficient shares of Idexx
      stock to total approximately $10,000,000.

2.    Terra hereby grants to Lawter an option ("option" or "put") pursuant to
      which Lawter may sell the Idexx shares, referred to in item 1 above, to
      Terra at a price one dollar per share lower than Lawter's average purchase
      price per share net of commission of Idexx.  This option may be exercised
      by Lawter in whole between December 10 and December 20, 1996 by giving
      twenty (20) days prior written notice to Terra specifying a date and a
      place for the closing of such purchase exercise which is not to be later
      than December 26, 1996.

3.    In order to induce Terra to enter into this Agreement, Lawter agrees and
      warrants to Terra as follows:

        (a)  This Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered
      by Lawter in accordance with its terms and pursuant to the authorization
      of the Board of Directors given on January 9, 1996.

        (b)  Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the
      consummation of the transaction contemplated above nor compliance with the
      terms, conditions and provisions hereof will conflict with or result in a
      breach of or violation of any of the terms, conditions, or provisions of
      Lawter's Certificate of Incorporation or By-Laws or any material Agreement
      or instrument to which Lawter is a party.

4.    This Agreement is binding upon Terra, his heirs, executor assigns and
      successors.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF Lawter and Terra have executed this Agreement on
January 9, 1996

                                                     LAWTER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
ATTEST:

By:  /s/ William S. Russell                            By:  /s/ John O'Mahoney
     -----------------------                                --------------

Its: V.P. Finance                                      Its: CEO


                                                       /s/ Daniel J. Terra
                                                           ----------------
                                                           Daniel J. Terra