alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

This 13th day of November, 2002.


/s/ Charles M. Jones, III
-------------------------
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ David J. Baranko
--------------------
Chief Financial Officer



<PAGE>
§ 30.17 Intimidation and retaliation prohibited. ( a ) A participant in an apprenticeship program may not be intimidated, threatened, coerced, retaliated against, or discriminated against because the individual has: ( 1 ) Filed a complaint alleging a violation of this part;
( 2 ) Opposed a practice prohibited by the provisions of this part or any other Federal or State equal opportunity law;
( 3 ) Furnished information to, or assisted or participated in any manner, in any investigation, compliance review, proceeding, or hearing under this part or any Federal or State equal opportunity law; or
( 4 ) Otherwise exercised any rights and privileges under the provisions of this part.
( b ) Any sponsor that permits such intimidation or retaliation in its apprenticeship program, including by participating employers, and fails to take appropriate steps to prevent such activity will be subject to enforcement action under § 30.15.
Director Fee
Arrangements                                                              Exhibit
10.9





Each
non-employee director of Capitol Federal Financial (the "Company") receives an
annual retainer, paid monthly, of $22,000 for his or her service on the board of
directors of Capitol Federal Savings Bank (the "Bank") and $22,000 for his or
her service on the Company's board of directors ($44,000 in total).
 
 John B.
Dicus, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and Morris
J. Huey, II, Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer, are each paid
$12,000 by the Bank and $12,000 by the Company ($24,000 in total) for their
service as directors of the Bank and Company.
§ 417.5 Notice. Notice of hearing shall be given not less than 10 days before such hearing is held unless the parties agree to a shorter notice period. Such notice shall be transmitted to the labor organization and the officer(s) accused of misconduct and other interested persons, insofar as they are known, and shall inform them of: ( a ) The time, place, and nature of the hearings;
( b ) The legal authority and jurisdiction under which the hearing is to be held; and
( c ) The matters of fact and law asserted.
The Labor organization shall inform its members of the provisions of the notice and copies of the notice shall be made available for inspection at the offices of the labor organization.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lite King Corporation (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in
      the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
                  November
                      13, 2007By:
                  /s/
                      John T. RuddyName:
                  John
                      T. RuddyTitle:
                  Chief Financial
                        Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Lite King Corporation and will be retained
      by Lite King Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.




EXHIBIT
            32.2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 102 (Thursday, May 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13171]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 33876]


State of Georgia, Department of Transportation--Acquisition 
Exemption--Georgia Southwestern Railroad, Inc.

    The State of Georgia, Department of Transportation (GDOT), a 
noncarrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 
1150.31 to acquire from Georgia Southwestern Railroad, Inc. (GSWR) 
certain railroad assets, including approximately 71.13 miles of rail 
line extending between Rochelle, GA (milepost 644.00), and a point near 
Preston, GA (milepost 713.00), and between Omaha, GA ( milepost 
753.00), and Mahrt, AL (milepost 755.13).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The transaction does not include the right or obligation to 
conduct common carrier freight operations. Heart of Georgia 
Railroad, Inc. (HOG) acquired the exclusive rail freight easement 
over the rail line. See Heart of Georgia Railroad, Inc.--Acquisition 
and Operation Exemption--State of Georgia and Georgia Southwestern 
Railroad, Inc., STB Finance Docket No. 33867 (STB served May 4, 
2000). HOG currently conducts and will continue to conduct common 
carrier freight operations over the rail line. Neither GDOT nor GSWR 
will have a common carrier obligation to provide freight services 
when this transaction is completed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The transaction is scheduled to take place as soon as possible 
after the May 22, 2000 effective date of the exemption.
    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio.\2\ Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the 
transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ A motion to dismiss has been filed in this proceeding. The 
motion will be addressed in a subsequent Board decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33876, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Luke Cousins, State of Georgia, Department of Transportation, 
#2 Capitol Square, S.W., Atlanta, GA 30334-1002.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
``WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.''

    Decided: May 18, 2000.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-13171 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0089 IN THE MATTER OF: H.R., A Youth. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 30, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 24 2022

10/24/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0089
§ 4043.31 Extraordinary dividend or stock redemption. ( a ) *Reportable event.* A reportable event occurs for a plan when any member of the plan's controlled group declares a dividend or redeems its own stock and the amount or net value of the distribution, when combined with other such distributions during the same fiscal year of the person, exceeds the person's net income before after-tax gain or loss on any sale of assets, as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, for the prior fiscal year. A distribution by a person to a member of its controlled group is disregarded.
( b ) *Determination rules.* For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the net value of a non-cash distribution is the fair market value of assets transferred by the person making the distribution, reduced by the fair market value of any liabilities assumed or consideration given by the recipient in connection with the distribution. Net value determinations should be based on readily available fair market value(s) or independent appraisal(s) performed within one year before the distribution is made. To the extent that fair market values are not readily available and no such appraisals exist, the fair market value of an asset transferred in connection with a distribution or a liability assumed by a recipient of a distribution is deemed to be equal to 200 percent of the book value of the asset or liability on the books of the person making the distribution. Stock redeemed is deemed to have no value.
( c ) *Waivers* — ( 1 ) *De minimis 10-percent segment.* Notice under this section is waived if the person making the distribution is a *de minimis* 10-percent segment of the plan's controlled group for the most recent fiscal year(s) ending on or before the date the reportable event occurs.
( 2 ) *Foreign entity.* Notice under this section is waived if the person making the distribution is a foreign entity other than a foreign parent.
( 3 ) *Small plan.* Notice under this section is waived if the plan had 100 or fewer participants for whom flat-rate premiums were payable for the plan year preceding the event year.
( 4 ) *Low-default-risk.* Notice under this section is waived if each contributing sponsor of the plan and the highest level U.S. parent of each contributing sponsor are low-default-risk on the date of the event.
( 5 ) *Well-funded plan.* Notice under this section is waived if the plan is in the well-funded plan safe harbor for the event year.
( 6 ) *Public company.* Notice under this section is waived if any contributing sponsor of the plan before the transaction, or the parent company within a parent-subsidiary controlled group of any such contributing sponsor, is a public company and timely files a SEC Form 8-K disclosing the event under an item of the Form 8-K other than under Item 2.02 (Results of Operations and Financial Condition) or in financial statements under Item 9.01 (Financial Statements and Exhibits).
[80 FR 55002, Sept. 11, 2015, as amended at 85 FR 6064, Feb. 4, 2020]
#### § 301.3 Organization.

The National Railroad Adjustment Board was organized as of July 31, 1934, in accordance with the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, approved June 21, 1934. The said Adjustment Board is composed of four Divisions, whose proceedings shall be independent of one another. The First, Second and Third Divisions thereof are each composed of 10 members, and the Fourth Division thereof is composed of 6 members.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Freddy Rivera, Also Known as Wilfredo Rivera, Appellant.

[696 NYS2d 820]

—Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Sheindlin, J.), rendered October 23, 1997 and February 18, 1998, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 2 to 6 years and 3 to 6 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

We perceive no abuse of discretion in the court’s denial of youthful offender treatment. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Tom, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             952
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   952
<PP&E>                                           1,029
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          934,176
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,517
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,981
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    52
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               413,589
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (413,537)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (413,537)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (413,537)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)


</TABLE>
§ 4231.4 Preservation of accrued benefits. ( a ) *General.* Section 4231(b)(2) of ERISA and § 4231.3(a)(1) require that no participant's or beneficiary's accrued benefit may be lower immediately after the effective date of the merger or transfer than the benefit immediately before the merger or transfer. Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a plan that assumes an obligation to pay benefits for a group of participants satisfies this requirement only if the plan contains a provision preserving all accrued benefits. The determination of what is an accrued benefit must be made in accordance with section 411 of the Code and the regulations thereunder.
( b ) *Waiver.* PBGC may waive the requirement of paragraph (a) of this section, § 4231.3(a)(1), and section 4231(b)(2) of ERISA to the extent the accrued benefit is suspended under section 305(e)(9) of ERISA contemporaneously with the merger or transfer. If waived, the plan provision described under paragraph (a) of this section may exclude accrued benefits only to the extent those benefits are suspended under section 305(e)(9) of ERISA contemporaneously with the merger or transfer.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 107 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2009 

Referred to the Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the rights of 

Members of Congress (or any employee of a Member 

of Congress authorized by that Member) to lead tours 

of the United States Capitol complex. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that— 

3 (1) Members of Congress (or any employee of 

4 a Member of Congress authorized by that Member) 

5 should not be prohibited, with or without prior no6 tice to the Architect of the Capitol, the Chief Execu7 tive Officer for Visitor Services, or the Capitol Guide 

8 Service, from taking guests or visitors into the pub9 licly accessible areas of the United States Capitol 

10 complex during normal business hours; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

SCON 107 RFH 

1 (2) nothing in this resolution shall be construed 

2 to affect the authority granted to employees of Mem3 bers of Congress by the respective Members relating 

4 to the movement of such employees through the 

5 United States Capitol complex; 

6 (3) at the direction of the Capitol Police Board 

7 or the fire marshal, the taking of guests or visitors 

8 into the publicly accessible areas of the United 

9 States Capitol complex by a Member of Congress (or 

10 any employee of a Member of Congress authorized 

11 by that Member) should be temporarily suspended or 

12 otherwise subject to restriction for safety or security 

13 reasons to the same extent as guided tours of the 

14 United States Capitol complex which are led by the 

15 Architect of the Capitol or the Capitol Guide Serv16 ice; and 

17 (4) nothing in this resolution shall be inter18 preted to contradict the Congressional staff-led tour 

19 policy that ensures that tours of the Capitol are con20 ducted by staff members who have undergone man21 datory life safety and historical accuracy training. 

Passed the Senate December 11 (legislative day, December 10), 2008. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
CONSULTINGAGREEMENT

 

       This Consulting Agreement for the exchange of consulting services for fees is byand between Twin Faces East Entertainment Corporation (TFAC), a NevadaCorporation located at 94 Arthur Hills Court, Henderson, NV. 89074, and JayMaiolini (Jay) of New York City, NY, collectively referred to as "TheParties".

 

       WHEREAS, TFAC is a developer of intellectual and entertainment properties, and

 

       WHEREAS, Jay has various connections and networking contacts in the corporatefinance business and development business,

 

       NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants provided herein, TheParties agree as follows:

 

       Jay shall provide services to TFAC on an as requested basis and in any capacityas requested by TFAC for securing financing for the maintenance of the business,

 

       TFAC shall compensate Jay for these services as follows:

-  Nine    Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($9.100) in fees payable the earlier of August    1, 2003 or the Company's receipt of funding in the amount of $1 million or    greater.
       The term of this Agreement is for the year 2003 at which time all obligationsunder this agreement shall cease.

 

       IN WITNESS THEREOF, TFAC has executed this Agreement effective as of the datesigned below.

 

       **/S/ Michael Smolanoff  **                                                                                                    **June 30, 2003**
       Michael Smolanoff,President                                                                                                Date

       Twin Faces East Entertainment Corporation

       **/S/John Maiolini  **                                                                                                            **June 30, 2003**
       John Maiolini anindividual                                                                                                    Date
** **
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.41(A)

                         EXTENSION OF CHANGE OF CONTROL
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     Pursuant to Section 1(b) of your Change of Control Employment Agreement
(the "Agreement"), dated as of January20, 2000, the term of the Agreement, as
stated in Section 1(b) thereof, is hereby extended by three (3) years, so that
the Agreement, as extended, will end on the sixth anniversary of its effective
date (specifically on January 20, 2006) rather than on the third anniversary
date.

     In all other respects, the Agreement is reaffirmed and remains unchanged.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Extension Agreement, pursuant to authorization
from the Board of Directors of the Company, is executed in the Company's name
and on its behalf as of the day and year shown herein.

     Date: June 25, 2002




                                     /s/ Kurt P. Rindoks
                                ---------------------------------
                                         Kurt P. Rindoks

                                KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION


                                By:    /s/ William A. Shumaker
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                          William A. Shumaker
                                    Its:  President and Chief Executive Officer
(78 South. 307)

#### MOORE v. STATE.

(6 Div. 372.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

March 12, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Walker County; T. L. Sowell, Judge.

Pete Moore was convicted of burglary and grand larceny, and he appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

Leith & Powell, of Jasper, for appellant. F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., and David W. W. Fuller, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRICKEN, J.

This defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted for the offense of burglary and grand larceny. The material questions involved in this appeal have been passed upon and *392decided by this court in the case of Cook v. State, ante, p. 390, 78 South. 306, present term.

Under authority of that case, the judgment of conviction in the lower court is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC. (REGISTRANT)
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David B. Swank, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify to the
best of my knowledge and belief pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005,
which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Registrant.


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter
63 title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.


Date:  August 12, 2005                            /s/ DAVID B. SWANK
                                                  --------------------------
                                 David B. Swank
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  (Principal Financial Officer)
#### §§ 2530.207-2530.209 [Reserved]
(76 South. 999)

#### STEAGALL v. PRIDGEN & HOLMAN.

(4 Div. 483.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 7, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Henry County; H. A. Pearce, Judge.

D. C. Halstead, of Headland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.