48802 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 9, 2011 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

The Department of Commerce will 

submit to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for clearance the 

following proposal for collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35). 

Agency: National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 

Title: Billfish Certificate of Eligibility. 

OMB Control Number: 0648–0216. 

Form Number(s): NA. 

Type of Request: Regular submission 

(extension of a current information 

collection). 

Number of Respondents: 200. 

Average Hours per Response: Initial 

dealer information, 20 minutes; 

subsequent dealers’ information, 2 

minutes. 

Burden Hours: 43. 

Needs and Uses: Under the provisions 

of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 

Conservation and Management Act (16 

U.S.C. 1801 et. seq.), NOAA is 

responsible for management of the 

Nation’s marine fisheries. In addition, 

NOAA must comply with the United 

States’ (U.S.) obligations under the 

Atlantic Tunas Convention Act of 1975 

(16 U.S.C. 971 et. seq.). A Certificate of 

Eligibility (COE) for Billfishes is 

required under 50 CFR part 635 to 

accompany all billfish, except for a 

billfish landed in a Pacific state and 

remaining in the state of landing. This 

documentation certifies that the 

accompanying billfish was not 

harvested from the applicable Atlantic 

Ocean management unit (described on 

the NOAA sample certificate at http:// 

www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/hms/GPEA/ 

0216%20Billfish%20COEform.pdf), and 

identifies the vessel landing the billfish, 

the vessel’s homeport, the port of 

offloading, and the date of offloading. 

The certificate must accompany the 

billfish to any dealer or processor who 

subsequently receives or possesses the 

billfish. The certificate is required for all 

first receivers of billfish, and dealers or 

processors who subsequently receive or 

possess billfish must also retain a copy 

of the certificate while processing or 

handling the billfish. A standard 

certificate format is not currently 

required to document the necessary 

information, provided it contains all of 

the information required. The 

continuation of this collection is 

necessary to implement the 

Consolidated Highly Migratory Species 

Fishery Management Plan, which 

contains an objective to reserve Atlantic 

billfish for the recreational fishery. 

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations. 

Frequency: On occasion. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. 

OMB Desk Officer: 

OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. 

Copies of the above information 

collection proposal can be obtained by 

calling or writing Diana Hynek, 

Departmental Paperwork Clearance 

Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of 

Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 

dHynek@doc.gov). 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to 

OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. 

Dated: August 3, 2011. 

Gwellnar Banks, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20096 Filed 8–8–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–489–807] 

Certain Steel Concrete Reinforcing 

Bars From Turkey; Notice of Amended 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: August 9, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 2, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–3874. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Amended Final Results 

On November 7, 2008, the Department 

of Commerce (the Department) 

published the final results of its 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain steel 

concrete reinforcing bars (rebar) from 

Turkey. See Certain Steel Concrete 

Reinforcing Bars From Turkey; Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and 

Determination To Revoke in Part, 73 FR 

66218 (Nov. 7, 2008). The period of 

review (POR) is April 1, 2006, through 

March 31, 2007. 

As part of this decision, the 

Department, following the methodology 

used in the 2005–2006 administrative 

review, depreciated an ‘‘asset’’ recorded 

in respondent Ekinciler Demir ve Celik 

Sanayi A.S.’s/Ekinciler Dis Ticaret 

A.S.’s (Ekinciler’s) financial statements 

which was later determined to be 

capitalized expenses from a proprietary 

event in an earlier period. 

Following the publication of the final 

results, Ekinciler filed a lawsuit with 

the United States Court of International 

Trade (CIT) challenging the 

Department’s final results of 

administrative review. See Ekinciler 

Demir ve Celik Sanayi A.S. & Ekinciler 

Dis Ticaret A.S. v. United States, Court 

No. 08–00415. Further, in litigation 

related to the 2005–2006 administrative 

review, the Court of Appeals for the 

Federal Circuit determined that the 

Department did not have the authority 

to depreciate the asset in question. See 

Nucor Corporation v. United States, 

Ekinciler, et al., Court No. 2009–1476 

(April 12, 2010). 

The United States and Ekinciler have 

now entered into an agreement to settle 

this dispute. Pursuant to the terms of 

the agreement between the United 

States and Ekinciler, we calculated the 

following amended final margin for 

Ekinciler for the POR and are amending 

the final results of the antidumping duty 

administrative review of rebar from 

Turkey as follows: 

Manufacturer/Producer/Exporter Margin Percentage 

Ekinciler Demir ve Celik Sanayi A.S./Ekinciler Dis Ticaret A.S. ............................................................................... 0.36 

Assessment 

The Department shall determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), for all sales made 

by Ekinciler, because we have the 

reported entered value of the U.S. sales, 

we have calculated importer-specific 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 9, 2011 / Notices 48803 

assessment rates based on the ratio of 

the total amount of antidumping duties 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of those sales. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate without 

regard to antidumping duties any 

entries for which the assessment rate is 

de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent). 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This 

clarification will apply to entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by Ekinciler for which it did 

not know its merchandise was destined 

for the United States. In such instances, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction. 

We are issuing this determination and 

publishing these amended final results 

and notice in accordance with 19 U.S.C. 

1516a(e). 

Dated: August 2, 2011. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20050 Filed 8–8–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of 

Scientific Instruments 

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 

Educational, Scientific and Cultural 

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. 

L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106– 

36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we 

invite comments on the question of 

whether instruments of equivalent 

scientific value, for the purposes for 

which the instruments shown below are 

intended to be used, are being 

manufactured in the United States. 

Comments must comply with 15 CFR 

301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and 

be postmarked on or before August 29, 

2011. Address written comments to 

Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 

3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

Washington, DC 20230. Applications 

may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 

5 p.m. at the U.S. Department of 

Commerce in Room 3720. 

Docket Number: 11–046. Applicant: 

University of California Los Angeles, 

595 Charles E. Young Drive East, 3806 

Geology Building, Los Angeles, CA 

90095. Instrument: Luminescence 

Reader. Manufacturer: Technical 

University of Denmark, Riso National 

Laboratory, Denmark. Intended Use: The 

instrument will be used to study the age 

of rock and sediment samples using 

thermoluminescence, optically 

stimulated luminescence and infrared 

luminescence. Justification for DutyFree Entry: No instruments of the same 

general category are being manufactured 

in the United States. Application 

accepted by Commissioner of Customs: 

July 18, 2011. 

Docket Number: 11–049. Applicant: 

University of Missouri, Electron 

Microscopy Core Facility, Veterinary 

Medicine Building, 1600 East Rollins, 

Columbia, MO 65211. Instrument: 

Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI 

Company, Czech Republic. Intended 

Use: The instrument will be used to 

study natural, synthetic and biological 

materials, to determine their atomic and 

crystalline structures, 3-dimensional 

organization at the nano level, elemental 

composition and organization. 

Justification for Duty-Free Entry: No 

instruments of the same general 

category are being manufactured in the 

United States. Application accepted by 

Commissioner of Customs: July 27, 

2011. 

Docket Number: 11–051. Applicant: 

DOD Uniformed Services University of 

the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge 

Road, Bethesda, MD 20814–4799. 

Instrument: Transmission Electron 

Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL, Japan. 

Intended Use: The instrument will be 

used to obtain extremely highmagnification images of biological 

samples, such as cells, tissues, bacteria 

and protein complexes, to study the 

characterization of injury and wound 

response and the effects of 

pharmacological agents on control and 

diseased tissues. Justification for DutyFree Entry: No instruments of the same 

general category are being manufactured 

in the United States. Application 

accepted by Commissioner of Customs: 

July 27, 2011. 

Dated: August 3, 2011. 

Gregory W. Campbell, 

Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Office 

of Policy, Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20207 Filed 8–8–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of 

Scientific Instruments 

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 

Educational, Scientific and Cultural 

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. 

L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106– 

36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we 

invite comments on the question of 

whether instruments of equivalent 

scientific value, for the purposes for 

which the instruments shown below are 

intended to be used, are being 

manufactured in the United States. 

Comments must comply with 15 CFR 

301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and 

be postmarked on or before August 29, 

2011. Address written comments to 

Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 

3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

Washington, DC 20230. Applications 

may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 

5 p.m. at the U.S. Department of 

Commerce in Room 3720. 

Docket Number: 11–030. Applicant: 

University of Chicago, Institute for 

Genomic Systems and Biology, 900 E 

57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637. 

Instrument: Digital Scanned Laser 

Microscope. Manufacturer: Emblem 

GMBH, Germany. Intended Use: The 

instrument will be used to study the 

functions and properties of biological 

materials, such as biomedical 

specimens, through microscopy imaging 

and recording of fluorescently labeled, 

light-sensitive samples. Justification for 

Duty-Free Entry: No instruments of the 

same or similar general category, which 

could be used for the intended 

purposes, are being manufactured in the 

United States. The DSLM is a new 

prototype not available commercially. 

Application accepted by Commissioner 

of Customs: May 27, 2011. 

Docket Number: 11–042. Applicant: 

Brandeis University, 415 South Street, 

Waltham, MA 02454. Instrument: 

Technai G2 F20 Twin Electron 

Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI 

Company, The Netherlands. Intended 

Use: The instrument will be used for 

NIH-funded basic biomedical research 

to study the chemical mechanisms of 

cellular proteins and molecules. 

Justification for Duty-Free Entry: No 

instruments of the same general 

category are being manufactured in the 

United States. Application accepted by 

Commissioner of Customs: July 1, 2011. 

Docket Number: 11–045. Applicant: 

University of California Santa Barbara, 

Building 503, Room 1355, Santa 

Barbara, CA 93106–5050. Instrument: 

Ultrasonic Fatigue Testing Equipment. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES