alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1987.106 Objections to the findings and the preliminary order and requests for a hearing. ( a ) Any party who desires review, including judicial review, of the findings and/or preliminary order, or a respondent alleging that the complaint was frivolous or brought in bad faith who seeks an award of attorney fees under FSMA, must file any objections and/or a request for a hearing on the record within 30 days of receipt of the findings and preliminary order pursuant to § 1987.105. The objections, request for a hearing, and/or request for attorney fees must be in writing and state whether the objections are to the findings, the preliminary order, and/or whether there should be an award of attorney fees. The date of the postmark, facsimile transmittal, or electronic transmittal is considered the date of filing; if the objection is filed in person, by hand-delivery or other means, the objection is filed upon receipt. Objections must be filed with the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Department of Labor, in accordance with 29 CFR part 18, and copies of the objections must be served at the same time on the other parties of record, the OSHA official who issued the findings and order, the Assistant Secretary, and the Associate Solicitor, Division of Fair Labor Standards, U.S. Department of Labor.
( b ) If a timely objection is filed, all provisions of the preliminary order will be stayed, except for the portion requiring preliminary reinstatement, which will not be automatically stayed. The portion of the preliminary order requiring reinstatement will be effective immediately upon the respondent's receipt of the findings and preliminary order, regardless of any objections to the order. The respondent may file a motion with the Office of Administrative Law Judges for a stay of the Assistant Secretary's preliminary order of reinstatement, which shall be granted only based on exceptional circumstances. If no timely objection is filed with respect to either the findings or the preliminary order, the findings and/or the preliminary order will become the final decision of the Secretary, not subject to judicial review.
[81 FR 22539, Apr. 18, 2016, as amended at 86 FR 1794, Jan. 11, 2021]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 35 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 551
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 35

                          [Report No. 110-850]

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2008

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                           September 15, 2008

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    To amend Public Law 108-331 to provide for the construction and 
 related activities in support of the Very Energetic Radiation Imaging 
          Telescope Array System (VERITAS) project in Arizona.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOCATION OF VERITAS PROJECT.

    Public Law 108-331 (118 Stat. 1281) is amended--
            (1) in the long title, by striking ``on Kitt Peak near 
        Tucson, Arizona'' and inserting ``in Arizona''; and
            (2) in section 1, by striking ``on Kitt Peak near Tucson, 
        Arizona'' and inserting ``at the Fred Lawrence Whipple 
        Observatory Base Camp on Mount Hopkins, Arizona, or other 
        similar location''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 551

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 35

                          [Report No. 110-850]

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

    To amend Public Law 108-331 to provide for the construction and 
 related activities in support of the Very Energetic Radiation Imaging 
          Telescope Array System (VERITAS) project in Arizona.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 15, 2008

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting

*Name:*                         Advisory Panel for Physiology and Ethology (1160).                    

*Date/Time:*                         February 14-15, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         NSF, Room 330, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Part-Open.                    

*Contact Persons:*                         Dr. Zoe Eppley, Program Director, Ecological & Evolutionary Physiology, and Dr. John Byers, Program Director, Animal Behavior, Division of Integrative Biology and Neuroscience, Suite 685, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: (703) 306-1421.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Minutes:*                         May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                    

*Agenda: Open Session:*                         February 15th, 2000; 2:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.—discussion on research trends, opportunities and assessment procedures in Integrative Biology and Neuroscience with Dr. James L. Edwards, Deputy Assistant Director, Directorate for Biological Sciences.                    

*Closed Session:*                         February 14th, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-6:00 p.m.; February 15th, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m., and 3:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. To review and evaluate the Ecological & Evolutionary Physiology & Animal Behavior DDIG proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: January 13, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Meeting Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-1234 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
§ 1919.11 Recordkeeping and related procedures concerning records in custody of accredited persons. ( a ) An accredited person shall maintain records of all work performed under subparts D and E of this part.
( b ) An accredited person shall maintain a continuous record of the status of the certification of each vessel issued a register by such person.
( c ) The records required in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section shall be available for examination by the Assistant Secretary.
( d ) When annual or quinquennial tests, inspections, examinations, or heat treatments are performed by an accredited person, other than the person who originally issued the vessel's register, such accredited person shall furnish copies of any certificates issued and information as to register entries to the person originally issuing the register.
( e ) An accredited person shall inform the nearest local office of the Administration whenever a vessel is initially certificated under these regulations and a register in the prescribed form has been issued.
( f ) A copy of each certificate relating to unit tests or thorough examinations, except those issued by the manufacturer and those issued by accredited persons outside of the United States, shall be sent to the nearest local office of the Administration within 10 days after issuance. Such records shall form a part of the Administration's file on the accredited person.
( g ) An accredited person shall promptly notify the nearest local office of the Administration with respect to any changes in technical personnel, in fee schedules in geographical areas in which operations are conducted, or other pertinent substantial changes in its organization or operations.
[39 FR 22096, June 19, 1974, as amended at 76 FR 33610, June 8, 2011]
§ 2570.136 Scope of discovery. For 502(c)(7) civil penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.14 of this title. ( a ) A party may file a motion to conduct discovery with the administrative law judge. The motion for discovery shall be granted by the administrative law judge only upon a showing of good cause. In order to establish “good cause” for the purposes of this section, a party must show that the discovery requested relates to a genuine issue as to a material fact that is relevant to the proceeding. The order of the administrative law judge shall expressly limit the scope and terms of discovery to that for which “good cause” has been shown, as provided in this paragraph.
( b ) A party may obtain discovery of documents and tangible things otherwise discoverable under paragraph (a) of this section and prepared in anticipation of or for the hearing by or for another party's representative (including his or her attorney, consultant, surety, indemnitor, insurer, or agent) only upon showing that the party seeking discovery has substantial need of the materials or information in the preparation of his or her case and that he or she is unable without undue hardship to obtain the substantial equivalent of the materials or information by other means. In ordering discovery of such materials when the required showing has been made, the administrative law judge shall protect against disclosure of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of an attorney or other representatives of a party concerning the proceeding.
IIA 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 36 

To provide replacement laboratory space for terrestrial research at the 

Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2008 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. COCHRAN, and Mr. DODD) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

To provide replacement laboratory space for terrestrial 

research at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERRESTRIAL RESEARCH PROGRAM. 

4 The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution 

5 is authorized to plan, design, and construct laboratory 

6 space to accommodate the Smithsonian Tropical Research 

7 Institute’s terrestrial research program in Gamboa, Pan8 ama. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•SJ 36 IS 

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 There are authorized to be appropriated for the pur3 poses described in section 1 $1,500,000 for fiscal year 

4 2008, $3,000,000 for fiscal year 2009, and a total of 

5 $11,000,000 for all succeeding fiscal years. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
§ 26.4 Service. ( a ) *Electronic service.* Electronic service may be completed by ( 1 ) Electronic mail, if consented to in writing by the person served; or
( 2 ) Sending it to a user registered with the Department's electronic case management system by filing via this system. A person who registers to use the Department's case management system is deemed to have consented to accept service through the system.
( b ) *Non-electronic service.* Unless otherwise provided by statute, regulation, executive order, or judge's order, non-electronic service may be completed by: ( 1 ) Personal delivery;
( 2 ) Mail; or
( 3 ) Commercial delivery.
( c ) *When service is effected.* Unless otherwise provided by statute, regulation, executive order, or judge's order, ( 1 ) Service by personal delivery is effected on the date the document is delivered to the recipient.
( 2 ) Service by mail or commercial carrier is effected on mailing or delivery to the carrier.
( 3 ) Service by electronic means is effected on sending.
`[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 45 Referred in House (RFH)]







110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 45


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 4, 2007

      Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION


 
Commending the Ed Block Courage Award Foundation for its work in aiding 
children and families affected by child abuse, and designating November 
                    2007 as National Courage Month.

Whereas the Ed Block Courage Award was established by Sam Lamantia in 1978 in 
        honor of Ed Block, the head athletic trainer of the Baltimore Colts and 
        a respected humanitarian;
Whereas each year in Baltimore, Maryland, the Foundation honors recipients from 
        the National Football League who have been chosen by their teammates as 
        exemplifying sportsmanship and courage;
Whereas the Ed Block Courage Award has become one of the most esteemed honors 
        bestowed upon players in the NFL;
Whereas the Ed Block Courage Award Foundation has grown from a Baltimore-based 
        local charity to the Courage House National Support Network for Kids 
        operated in partnership with 17 NFL teams in their respective cities; 
        and
Whereas Courage Houses are facilities that provide support and care for abused 
        children and their families in these 17 locations across the country: 
        Baltimore, Maryland, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Chicago, Illinois, Miami, 
        Florida, Detroit, Michigan, Dallas, Texas, Westchester County, New York, 
        Oakland, California, Seattle, Washington, Charlotte, North Carolina, 
        Cleveland, Ohio, Atlanta, Georgia, St. Louis, Missouri, Indianapolis, 
        Indiana, Buffalo, New York, San Francisco, California, and Minneapolis, 
        Minnesota: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) National Courage Month provides an opportunity to 
        educate the people of the United States about the positive role 
        that professional athletes can play as inspirations for 
        America's youth; and
            (2) the Ed Block Courage Award Foundation should be 
        recognized for its outstanding contributions toward helping 
        those affected by child abuse.

            Passed the Senate October 3, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.`
#### § 38.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to implement the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA), which are contained in section 188 of WIOA (29 U.S.C. 3248). Section 188 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or political affiliation or belief, or, for beneficiaries, applicants, and participants only, on the basis of citizenship status or participation in a WIOA Title I-financially assisted program or activity. This part clarifies the application of the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIOA and provides uniform procedures for implementing them.
Exhibit
      32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350








CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Citizens First
      Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report") I, Mary D. Cohron, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
            /s/Mary
                D. CohronMary
                D. CohronChief
                Executive OfficerDate:
            August
                14, 2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6595

CHARLES EDWARD PATTERSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DARRELL V. MCGRAW, JR.; JOE THORNTON, MAPS Secretary; TERRI 

SWECKER, Director of SORA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Thomas E. Johnston, 

District Judge. (2:13-cv-03825)

Submitted: July 29, 2014 Decided: August 1, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Edward Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Edward Patterson seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Patterson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### DANSEGLIO v STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 86-357 AC (County Court Case No. 56524, 5NR)

Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Appellate Division, Dade County

November 2, 1987

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Edward C. Vining, Jr. for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Richard L. Kaplan, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALMON, SHAPIRO, GREENBAUM, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

SHAPIRO, Judge.

Appellant and one LORI WILLIAMS were arrested and charged *151with reckless driving and drag racing. The matters were scheduled for trial before the Court. The WILLIAMS case was called by the Judge, the witnesses sworn and testimony commenced. During the proceedings, Appellant began giving testimony either in defense of the charges against him or in support of Ms. Williams. It is apparent from the record however, that the matter being tried was not the case of Appellant but that of Ms. Williams. The trial Judge found both Williams and Appellant guilty of the charges and imposed sentence. This appeal is from that decision.

While proceedings in the County Court are somewhat informal, certain formalities must be followed. This was not done in Appellant’s case. Because of this, we are compelled to reverse the decision of the lower Court and remand this matter for trial on the merits.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

SALMON, GREENBAUM, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12426]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 040400C]


Fisheries Off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific; 
Northern Anchovy Fishery; Correction

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Correction to announcement of receipt of an application for an 
exempted fishing permit (EFP).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to an announcement of 
receipt of an application for an EFP for northern anchovy in an area 
off San Francisco ordinarily closed to vessels fishing to reduce the 
catch into products such as fish meal and oil, that was published in 
the Federal Register on May 3, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Morgan at 310-980-4036.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 3, 2000, at 65 FR 25709, NMFS 
announced receipt of an application for an EFP to harvest northern 
anchovy off the coast of California in a closed area off of Farallon 
Islands. That document contained incorrect dates for the Pacific 
Fishery Management Council meeting.

Correction

    On page 25709, in the second column, in the second complete 
paragraph, in the second line, ``June 23-26, 2000,'' should read ``June 
26-30, 2000''.

    Dated: May 12, 2000.
Bruce C. Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Management, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 00-12426 Filed 5-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F