alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Vocational Rehabilitation /
              - 12.6 Vocational Rehabilitation—Postsecondary Institution of Higher Education Expenditures

## Table 12.6: Vocational Rehabilitation—Post-secondary Institution of Higher Education Expenditures (in dollars): Federal Fiscal Year 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
#### City of Schenectady, Respondent, *v.*James P. Kalteux, Appellant.

Submitted October 1, 1937;

decided October 19, 1937.

*611
      *James E. O’Loughlin*for appellant.

*Thomas W. Wallace, Corporation Counsel,*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J-, Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Lquqbran, Finch and Rirpby, JJ.
----

COURT OF JUSTICE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 10 June 2004

in Case C-454/01: Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (1)

(Directive 96/59/EC - Waste management - Disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls and polychlorinated terphenyls)

(2004/C 190/01)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-454/01: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: G. zur Hausen ) v Federal Republic of Germany (Agents: W.-D. Plessing and R. Stüwe ) - application for a declaration that, by failing to draw up or to communicate to the Commission, within the prescribed period, the plan provided for in the first indent of Article 11(1) of Council Directive 96/59/EC of 16 September 1996 on the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls and polychlorinated terphenyls (PCB/PCT) (OJ 1996 L 243, p. 31), the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty - the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, R. Schintgen, F. Macken and N. Colneric, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 10 June 2004, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 17 of 19.1.2002.

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                 

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​. 

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 15, 2000. 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas**                     (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:                 

*1. Northwest Bancorporation, Inc.,*                     Houston, Texas; to merge with Redstone Bancorporation, Inc., Houston, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire Redstone Bank, N. A., Houston, Texas.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 16, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-12709 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust VI (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding VI, L.P.
for the period ended June 25, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Haig J. Nargesian,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST VI


                              By:  /s/ HAIG J. NARGESIAN
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Haig J. Nargesian *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: August 4, 2004
_____________________

* Haig J. Nargesian functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Order entered March 2, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01415-CV

SOUTHAMPTON LTD. AND SOUTHWEST REINSURANCE, INC., Appellants

V.

FOUR HORSEMEN AUTO GROUP, INC., CHISHOLM TRAIL AUTO GROUP, LLC, 

CHISHOLM TRAIL AUTO GROUP II, LLC, CHISHOLM TRAIL REAL ESTATE, 

LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-13331

ORDER

We GRANT appellants’ February 26, 2015 unopposed motion for extension of time to

file reply brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than March 17, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
§ 417.6 Powers of Administrative Law Judge. The designated Administrative Law Judge shall have authority: ( a ) To give notice concerning and to conduct hearings;
( b ) To administer oaths and affirmations;
( c ) To issue subpoenas;
( d ) To rule upon offers of proof and receive relevant evidence;
( e ) To take or cause depositions to be taken whenever the ends of justice would be served thereby;
( f ) To regulate the course of the hearing;
( g ) To hold conferences for the settlement or simplification of the issues by consent of the parties;
( h ) To dispose of procedural requests or other matters;
( i ) To limit the number of witnesses at hearings, or limit or exclude evidence or testimony which may be irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative;
( j ) If appropriate or necessary to exclude persons or counsel from participation in hearings for refusing any proper request for information or documentary evidence, or for contumacious conduct;
( k ) To grant continuances or reschedule hearings for good cause shown;
( l ) To consider and decide procedural matters;
( m ) To take any other actions authorized by the regulations in this part.
The Administrative Law Judge's authority in the case shall terminate upon his filing of the record and his initial decision with the Director, or when he shall have withdrawn from the case upon considering himself disqualified, or upon termination of his authority by the Director for good cause stated. However, the Administrative Law Judge's authority may be reinstated upon referral of some or all the issues by the Director for rehearing. This authority will terminate upon certification of the rehearing record to the Director. [29 FR 8264, July 1, 1964, as amended at 78 FR 8025, Feb. 5, 2013]
ex10_14.htm


Exhibit 10.14







PROMISSORY NOTE







April 22, 2014












To: Sean Sego – Independent Director NAS







From: Robert Chance







Re: Promissory Note payable – Related Party Debt







I, Sean Sego agree to loan National Automation Services, Inc. $28,000.00 for the purposes of being able to retire short term debt under the following terms:









	
  

	
1.)

	
The Term of the loan is 60 days from the date the funds are transferred and received by National Automation Services, Inc. or the date of this agreement whichever is first.  The interest to be accrued is at 10% per annum.  The purpose of this Note is to extend the time needed to pay the original holders (below) and significantly reduce the accrual of interest.








	
  

	
2.)

	
Payment, including principle and interest is required within 5 days of maturity of the Term.  If the Payment is not received in such time than the Note will at the option of Holder (Sean Sego) become a convertible note bearing the same terms conversion afforded the original holders (below). These notes are referenced below include interest payable along with principle:








	
  

	
o

	
Clarke – 2850.00








	
  

	
o

	
Hayek – 2850.00








	
  

	
o

	
Defily – 2850.00








	
  

	
o

	
Stangl – 5720.00








	
  

	
o

	
Haggard – 1,150.00








	
  

	
o

	
Krochak – 13,000.00







 




 





	
/s/ Sean Sego                

	  
	
Sean P Sego


	
Note Holder


	  
	  
	
/s/ Robert Chance

	  
	
Robert Chance


	
President/Chief Executive Officer


	
National Automation Services, Inc.
----

----

I Communications

Commission

----

Taux de change de l'euro (1)

22 septembre 2004

(2004/C 236/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: taux de change de référence publié par la Banque centrale européenne.

----

----

Non-opposition à une concentration notifiée

(Affaire COMP/M.3491 — BAE SYSTEMS/ALVIS)

(2004/C 236/02)

(Texte présentant de l'intérêt pour l'EEE)

Le 10 août 2004, la Commission a décidé de ne pas s'opposer à la concentration notifiée susmentionnée et de la déclarer compatible avec le marché commun. Cette décision est basée sur l'article 6, paragraphe 1, point b), du règlement (CE) no 139/2004 du Conseil. Le texte intégral de la décision est disponible seulement en anglais et sera rendu public après suppression des secrets d'affaires qu'il puisse contenir. Il sera disponible:

----

----

Non-opposition à une concentration notifiée

(Affaire COMP/M.3480 — 3i/KEOLIS)

(2004/C 236/03)

(Texte présentant de l'intérêt pour l'EEE)

Le 2 juillet 2004, la Commission a décidé de ne pas s'opposer à la concentration notifiée susmentionnée et de la déclarer compatible avec le marché commun. Cette décision est basée sur l'article 6, paragraphe 1, point b), du règlement (CE) no 139/2004 du Conseil. Le texte intégral de la décision est disponible seulement en français et sera rendu public après suppression des secrets d'affaires qu'il puisse contenir. Il sera disponible:

CELEX: information abonné

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm.

----

----

Non-opposition à une concentration notifiée

(Affaire COMP/M.3541 — TPG POST/ESSENT RETAIL/CENDRIS-BSC JV)

(2004/C 236/04)

(Texte présentant de l'intérêt pour l'EEE)

Le 15 septembre 2004, la Commission a décidé de ne pas s'opposer à la concentration notifiée susmentionnée et de la déclarer compatible avec le marché commun. Cette décision est basée sur l'article 6, paragraphe 1, point b), du règlement (CE) no 139/2004 du Conseil. Le texte intégral de la décision est disponible seulement en anglais et sera rendu public après suppression des secrets d'affaires qu'il puisse contenir. Il sera disponible:

----

----

Non-opposition à une concentration notifiée

(Affaire COMP/M.3346 — NYK REEFERS/LAURITZEN COOL/LCL JV)

(2004/C 236/05)

(Texte présentant de l'intérêt pour l'EEE)

Le 7 juin 2004, la Commission a décidé de ne pas s'opposer à la concentration notifiée susmentionnée et de la déclarer compatible avec le marché commun. Cette décision est basée sur l'article 6, paragraphe 1, point b), du règlement (CEE) no 4064/89 du Conseil. Le texte intégral de la décision est disponible seulement en anglais et sera rendu public après suppression des secrets d'affaires qu'il puisse contenir. Il sera disponible:

----
#### § 1641.4 Standards for investigations, hearings, determinations and other proceedings.

In any OFCCP investigation, hearing, determination or other proceeding involving a complaint/charge that is dual filed under both section 503 and the ADA, OFCCP will utilize legal standards consistent with those applied under the ADA in determining whether an employer has engaged in an unlawful employment practice. EEOC and OFCCP will coordinate the arrangement of any necessary training regarding the substantive or procedural provisions of the ADA, and of EEOC's implementing regulations (29 CFR part 1630 and 29 CFR part 1601).
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 103 (Friday, May 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13198]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6705-8]


Proposed CERCLA Prospective Purchaser Agreement for the Former 
O'Shux Golf Course, Adjacent to the Copley Square Plaza Superfund Site

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposal of CERCLA Prospective Purchaser Agreement for the 
former O'Shux Golf Course as part of the settlement of the Copley 
Square Plaza Superfund Site.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9601 et 
seq., as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 
1986 (SARA), Public Law 99-499, notice is hereby given that a proposed 
prospective purchaser agreement (PPA) for the former O'Shux Golf Course 
adjacent to the Copley Square Plaza Superfund Site (Site) located in 
Copley, Ohio, has been executed by Ameri-Con Inc. The proposed PPA has 
been submitted to the Attorney General for approval. The proposed PPA 
would resolve certain potential claims of the United States under 
sections 106 and 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 9607, against Ameri-
Con Inc. and Ameri-Con Copley, Ltd. The proposed PPA will not pay any 
money directly to the United States, but is part of a larger settlement 
by which the United States stands to recover just under 50% of its 
outstanding response costs incurred at the Site. The Site is not on the 
National Priorities List.

DATES: Comments on the proposed PPA must be received by U.S. EPA on or 
before June 26, 2000.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the proposed PPA is available for review at U.S. 
EPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 
Please contact Kathleen Schnieders at (312) 353-8912, prior to visiting 
the Region 5 office.
    Comments on the proposed PPA should be addressed to Kathleen 
Schnieders, Office of Regional Counsel, U.S. EPA, Region 5, 77 West 
Jackson Boulevard (Mail Code C-14J), Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Schnieders at (312) 353-8912, 
of the U.S. EPA Region 5 Office of Regional Counsel.
    A 30-day period, commencing on the date of publication of this 
notice, is open for comments on the proposed PPA. Comments should be 
sent to the addressee identified in this notice.

Richard C. Karl,
Acting Director, Superfund Division, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 00-13198 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
§ 2570.51 Public inspection and copies. ( a ) From the date the administrative record of each exemption is established pursuant to § 2570.32(d), the administrative record of each exemption will be open for public inspection and copying at the EBSA Public Disclosure Room, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210.
( b ) Upon request, the staff of the Public Disclosure Room will furnish photocopies of an administrative record, or any specified portion of that record, for a specified charge per page; or, at the discretion of the Department, provide the administrative record electronically for a specified charge.
AFS-13-378-E

July 1, 2013

 Exemption No. 10812

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0443

Ms. Rebecca Stewart

Parent of Lindsey Stewart

802 Darwin’s Way

Granite Falls, WA 98252

Dear Ms. Stewart:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date 

it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received May 14, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Lindsey Stewart for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Lindsey to exceed the 

specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by 

AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.)

aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the 

Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting 

on this petition would be detrimental to Lindsey.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those 

presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that 

numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using restraint systems 
2

that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security in the same manner of 

operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the petition, if granted, would not 

set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation 

you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I hereby grant Lindsey Stewart an exemption from § 121.311(b). In addition, any 

air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Lindsey is aboard its aircraft is 

granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary to allow him to use an 

FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Lindsey’s parents or a 

caregiver accompanying her. Lindsey Stewart may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger 

seated behind her. In addition, Lindsey’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption 

and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours before the date of 

each flight.

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen

Director, Flight Standards

 Service

Enclosure
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.2

a21, Inc.
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 500
San Francisco, California 94111
(415) 284-2121

CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of a21, Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB/A for the period ending  September 30, 2002 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Albert  Pleus,
Chairman of the Board of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Albert Pleus
---------------
Albert Pleus, Chairman
(Principal Financial Officer)



<PAGE>