alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>				5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY
FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONDENSED BALANCE
SHEET AS OF MAY 31,2000 AND
THE RELATED CONDENSEDSTATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTH
PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>			1

<S>					<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>			    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>			MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>			   APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>			     MAY-31-2000
<CASH>				          130,607
<SECURITIES>			     0
<RECEIVABLES>			    30,169
<ALLOWANCES>			     0
<INVENTORY>				     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>			 165,407
<PP&E>				          4,033
<DEPRECIATION>			   2,433
<TOTAL-ASSETS>			   231,864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>	351,110
<BONDS>				         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>	0
<PREFERRED>				     0
<COMMON>				        10,550
<OTHER-SE>				      (129,796)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	231,864
<SALES>				         125,858
<TOTAL-REVENUES>			 125,858
<CGS>					          96,909
<TOTAL-COSTS>			    78,177
<OTHER-EXPENSES>			 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>			 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>		0
<INCOME-PRETAX>			  (49,228)
<INCOME-TAX>			     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>	(49,228)
<DISCONTINUED>			   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>			  0
<CHANGES>				       0
<NET-INCOME>			     (49,228)
<EPS-BASIC>			    0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>			    0.00





















</TABLE>
[Nos. 49488-1-I; 49254-3-I.

Division One.

December 23, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. William Douglas Summers, *Appellant. In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of*William Douglas Summers, *Petitioner.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 01-1-03394-4, Douglas D. McBroom, J., entered August 14, 2001, together with a petition for relief from personal restraint. Judgment *affirmed*and petition *denied*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
§ 511.12 Committee and subcommittee meetings. ( a ) The full committee, or a quorum thereof, will convene at the time and place appointed for an initial prehearing meeting as provided in the Secretary's order initiating the proceedings (note § 511.2). The full committee acting through a quorum will decide at that meeting whether it will preside at the reception at the hearing or will authorize a subcommittee to preside. Any resolution authorizing a subcommittee to hold the hearing shall provide a period of 30 days after: ( 1 ) The subcommittee has filed its recommended report and
( 2 ) A transcript of the subcommittee hearing is made available to the parties, for the parties to file exceptions to the recommended report, and the committee shall meet promptly thereafter on call of its chairperson or the Administrator to consider exceptions and prepare its final report.
( b ) A committee may adjourn its meeting or hearing, or both, from time to time, and meet again, at hearing or otherwise, pursuant to the terms of adjournment, or on call of its chairperson or the Administrator.
[55 FR 53299, Dec. 28, 1990]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12855]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Psychopharmacological Drugs Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory 
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will 
be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Psychopharmacological Drugs Advisory Committee
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and 
recommendations to the agency on FDA's regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on July 19, 2000, 8 a.m. to 
5 p.m.
    Location: Holiday Inn, Versailles Ballrooms I, II, and III, 8120 
Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD.
    Contact Person: Sandra L. Titus or LaNise S. Giles, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research (HFD-21), 5600 Fishers Lane (for express 
delivery, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1093) Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-
7001, or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c793aeb3b2b4b487a4a3a2b5e9a1a3a6e9a0a8b1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="64300d1011171724070001164a0200054a030b12">[email protected]</span></a>, or FDA Advisory Committee 
Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the Washington, DC 
area) code 12544. Please call the Information Line for up-to-date 
information on this meeting.
    Agenda: The committee will consider the safety and efficacy of new 
drug application (NDA) 20-825, Zeldox<SUP>TM</SUP> (ziprasidone 
hydrochloride capsules, Pfizer, Inc.), proposed for the management of 
psychotic disorders.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or 
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee. 
Written submissions may be made to the contact person by July 17, 2000. 
Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled on July 19, 2000, 
between approximately 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. Time allotted for each 
presentation may be limited. Those desiring to make formal oral 
presentations should notify the contact person before July 17, 2000, 
and submit a brief statement of the general nature of the evidence or 
arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses of proposed 
participants, and an indication of the approximate time requested to 
make their presentation.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: May 11, 2000.
Linda A. Suydam,
Senior Associate Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 00-12855 Filed 5-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Population and Prevelance /
              - 1.2 State Resident Population—Projections: 2015 to 2030

## Table 1.2: State Resident Population—Projections: 2015 to 2030

********

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
THE ENSTAR GROUP, INC.'S AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS
REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          64,265
<SECURITIES>                                     3,615
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             132
<DEPRECIATION>                                      74
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              176
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,537
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,413
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,672
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,399
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  12
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,261
<INCOME-TAX>                                       124
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,137
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,137
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40


</TABLE>
§ 4010.6 Information to be filed. ( a ) *General* — ( 1 ) *Current filers.* A filer must submit the information specified in § 4010.7 (identifying information), § 4010.8 (plan actuarial information) and § 4010.9 (financial information) with respect to each member of the filer's controlled group and each plan maintained by any member of the filer's controlled group, and any other information relating to the information specified in §§ 4010.7 through 4010.9, as specified in the instructions on PBGC's Web site, *http://www.pbgc.gov .*
( 2 ) *Previous filers.* If a filer for the immediately preceding information year is not required to file for the current information year, the filer must submit information, in accordance with the instructions on PBGC's Web site, *http://www.pbgc.gov*, demonstrating why a filing is not required for the current information year.
( b ) *Additional information.* By written notification, PBGC may require any filer to submit additional actuarial or financial information that is necessary to determine plan assets and liabilities for any period through the end of the filer's information year, or the financial status of a filer for any period through the end of the filer's information year (including information on exempt entities and exempt plans). The information must be submitted within ten days after the date of the written notification or by a different time specified therein.
( c ) *Previous submissions.* If any required information has been previously submitted to PBGC, a filer may incorporate this information into the required submission by referring to the previous submission.
[61 FR 34022, July 1, 1996, as amended at 70 FR 11544, Mar. 9, 2005; 74 FR 11031, Mar. 16, 2009]
Opinion filed November 30, 2010

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-10-00173-CV

__________

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

BLUE 1966 FORD MUSTANG VIN #6R07A105961

(Stacey McGrew), Appellee

On Appeal from the Count Court at Law No. 2

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 4922

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is a civil forfeiture action brought under the TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. ch.47 

(Vernon 2006 & Supp. 2010). The justice court found that the Blue 1966 Ford Mustang VIN 

#6R07A105961 was stolen and determined that Francine Yuro had a superior right of possession 

than Stacey McGrew. McGrew appealed to the county court for a trial de novo. TEX. R. CIV.

P. 574b. The county court then granted Stacey McGrew’s motion for summary judgment finding 

that McGrew was the only person to present a claim to the vehicle and that his claim was a valid 

prima facie claim. The State of Texas appealed pursuant to Article 47.12. We dismiss.
2

McGrew argues that, because no oral notice of appeal was given as required by 

Article 47.12( c), the State has failed to timely perfect an appeal. The State contends that this 

court has jurisdiction because it timely filed a written notice of appeal.

Article 47.12 provides that only “an interested person who appears at a hearing under this 

article may appeal, and such person must give an oral notice of appeal at the conclusion of the 

hearing” as well as follow the applicable Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The oral notice 

of appeal is required to invoke the jurisdiction of this court. Phillips v. State, 77 S.W.3d 465, 

467 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.); White v. State, 930 S.W.2d 673, 675-76 

(Tex. App.—Waco 1996, no pet.). The record does not reflect that the State gave the required 

oral notice of appeal, and the State does not argue that it gave one. 

The State relies on its written notice of appeal and on the fact that it is appealing from the 

granting of a motion for summary judgment. The State contends that the requirement of an oral 

notice of appeal applies only when the trial court holds a hearing on the merits. We disagree.

Article 47.12 clearly applies to appeals from proceedings brought under Chapter 47. 

McGrew filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that there was no evidence that 

the vehicle was acquired by theft and requested that the trial court not only grant the motion but 

also order the vehicle restored to him. This is the relief the trial court granted. The trial court 

disposed of the merits of the case in its judgment. To hold that Article 47.12 does not apply to 

the facts of this case would violate the legislature’s intent concerning appeals from civil 

forfeiture proceedings.

Absent an oral notice of appeal in compliance with Article 47.12, the jurisdiction of this 

court is not invoked. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. In reaching its decision, 

the court only considered evidence properly included in the record. 

PER CURIAM

November 30, 2010

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secretes or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         May 24, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8 am to 4 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         One Washington Circle, 1 Washington Circle NW, Washington, DC 20037.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Phillip F. Wiethorn, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd, Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-9223.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 10, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-12538  Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Abraham Touro *versus*John Coates and Trustees.

The service of a summons on one as a trustee of an absconding debtor, by leaving a copy at his dwelling-house, was not intended for the case of one absent by sea, but to guard against the fraudulent avoidance of persons liable.

Where one was summoned, while at sea, by a copy left at his house, and at the first term after his return disclosed, and was discharged, it was holden that he •was entitled to his costs.

Thomas Brewer, one of the trustees summoned in this process, was absent on a voyage to *South America*at the time the suit was commenced, after which more than a year elapsed before his return into the commonwealth. The service upon him was by the officer’s leaving a copy of the process at Mr. *Brewer’s*last and usual place of abode. The action being continued in the Court of Common Pleas, he appeared at the first term after his return, and submitted to examination.

Upon the appeal, *this Court*were satisfied that he could not be *33holden as trustee by the facts in his disclosure, and on that ground discharged him.

They also observed that the statute, (1) in authorizing a service upon a trustee, by leaving a copy at his usual place of abode, could not intend the case of one absent at sea, who could not obtain knowledge of the service for a long time. The provision was meant to guard against the fraudulent avoidance of persons liable as trustees.

As the trustee came in and disclosed at the first term after his return from sea, the Court awarded him his costs, considering him within the equity of the statute.

ADDITIONAL NOTE

[See, as to service of writs, *Ames*vs. Winsot, 19 *Pick.*247. — F. H.]

(1)

*Stat.*1794, c. 65.
#### § 2570.52 Effective date.

This subpart is effective with respect to all exemptions filed with or initiated by the Department under ERISA section 408(a), Code section 4975(c)(2), and/or 5 U.S.C. 8477(c)(3) at any time on or after April 8, 2024. Applications for exemptions under ERISA section 408(a), Code section 4975(c)(2), and/or 5 U.S.C. 8477(c)(3) filed on or after December 27, 2011, but before April 8, 2024, are governed by 29 CFR part 2570 (revised effective December 27, 2011).
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20548

Conference Calendar

 

JOSEPH EUGENE JACKSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MARY WARD, Captain,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA H 96-900

- - - - - - - - - -

April 17, 1997

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Texas state prisoner Joseph Eugene Jackson, No. 673561,

appeals the dismissal with prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

action as duplicative of a previous civil rights action. This

Court GRANTS him leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on

appeal.

Jackson’s claims and the surrounding facts are the same as

those he raised in his previous suit. The district court did not
No. 96-20548

- 2 -

abuse its discretion in finding Jackson’s complaint in this case

to be duplicative and in dismissing it under § 1915. See Wilson

v. Lynaugh, 878 F.2d 846, 850 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S.

969 (1989); see also Graves v. Hampton, 1 F.3d 315, 318 (5th Cir.

1993)).

We DISMISS Jackson’s appeal of his duplicative lawsuit as

without arguable merit and frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707

F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Jackson’s

motion to subpoena documentary evidence is also DENIED as

frivolous. We caution Jackson that any additional frivolous

appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition

of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Jackson is further cautioned

to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise

arguments that are frivolous. 

Jackson’s current zero balance leaves him unable to pay the

initial partial filing fee required by an IFP appellant. 

However, Jackson is still responsible for payment of the full

amount of the filing fee. He shall make monthly payments of 20

percent of the preceding month’s income credited to his account

towards full payment of the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(b)(2). The agency having custody of Jackson is directed

to forward payments from his account to the clerk of the district

court each time the amount in his account exceeds $10 until the

filing fee is paid. See id. 

IFP GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; MOTION DENIED AS
No. 96-20548

- 3 -

FRIVOLOUS; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED; FEE ASSESSED.