alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 14.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

     We consent to the reference to our firm in the headnote to Item 3. Key
Information -- Selected Financial Data and the use of our report dated November
3, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Amdocs Limited included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ended September 30, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and incorporated by reference in the following registration
statements:

                              COMMISSION FILE NO.
                            Form S-8, No. 333-91847
                            Form S-8, No. 333-92705
                            Form S-8, No. 333-31506
                            Form S-8, No. 333-34104
                            Form S-8, No. 333-58454
                            Form S-8, No. 333-114077
                Form F-3 (and related Prospectus), No. 333-39278
                Form F-3 (and related Prospectus), No. 333-44994
                Form F-3 (and related Prospectus), No. 333-57036
                Form F-3 (and related Prospectus), No. 333-67572
               Form F-3 (and related Prospectus), No. 333-114079
               Form F-3 (and related Prospectus), No. 333-114344

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
December 28, 2005
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 60567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23909]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8907]

In the Matter of the Designation of Mohammed Abdel-Halim Hemaida 
Saleh Also Known as Muhammad Abd-al-Halim Humaydah as a Specially 
Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 
13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Mohammed Abdel-
Halim Hemaida Saleh, also known as Muhammad Abd-al-Halim Humaydah, 
committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism 
that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, 
foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

     Dated: September 19, 2014.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-23909 Filed 10-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
`[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 14 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]






                                                       Calendar No. 179
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 14

   Expressing the sense of the Senate that Attorney General Alberto 
   Gonzales no longer holds the confidence of the Senate and of the 
                            American people.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2007

 Mr. Schumer (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Biden, Mr. 
Durbin, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Bingaman, Mrs. Boxer, 
 Mr. Brown, Mr. Byrd, Mr. Casey, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Dorgan, 
   Mr. Harkin, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Kerry, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Levin, Mr. 
Menendez, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Nelson of Florida, Mr. Obama, Mr. Reid, Mr. 
  Sanders, Ms. Stabenow, and Mr. Webb) introduced the following joint 
               resolution; which was read the first time

                              May 25, 2007

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
   Expressing the sense of the Senate that Attorney General Alberto 
   Gonzales no longer holds the confidence of the Senate and of the 
                            American people.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENSE OF THE SENATE.

    It is the sense of the Senate that Attorney General Alberto 
Gonzales no longer holds the confidence of the Senate and of the 
American people.




                                                       Calendar No. 179

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 14

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

   Expressing the sense of the Senate that Attorney General Alberto 
   Gonzales no longer holds the confidence of the Senate and of the 
                            American people.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 25, 2007

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar`
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 45 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.45
                                               Agreed to October 3, 2007

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                          Concurrent Resolution

Whereas the Ed Block Courage Award was established by Sam Lamantia in 
  1978 in honor of Ed Block, the head athletic trainer of the Baltimore 
  Colts and a respected humanitarian;

Whereas each year in Baltimore, Maryland, the Foundation honors 
  recipients from the National Football League who have been chosen by 
  their teammates as exemplifying sportsmanship and courage;

Whereas the Ed Block Courage Award has become one of the most esteemed 
  honors bestowed upon players in the NFL;

Whereas the Ed Block Courage Award Foundation has grown from a 
  Baltimore-based local charity to the Courage House National Support 
  Network for Kids operated in partnership with 17 NFL teams in their 
  respective cities; and

Whereas Courage Houses are facilities that provide support and care for 
  abused children and their families in these 17 locations across the 
  country: Baltimore, Maryland, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Chicago, 
  Illinois, Miami, Florida, Detroit, Michigan, Dallas, Texas, 
  Westchester County, New York, Oakland, California, Seattle, 
  Washington, Charlotte, North Carolina, Cleveland, Ohio, Atlanta, 
  Georgia, St. Louis, Missouri, Indianapolis, Indiana, Buffalo, New 
  York, San Francisco, California, and Minneapolis, Minnesota: Now, 
  therefore, be it

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
        (1) National Courage Month provides an opportunity to educate 
    the people of the United States about the positive role that 
    professional athletes can play as inspirations for America's youth; 
    and
        (2) the Ed Block Courage Award Foundation should be recognized 
    for its outstanding contributions toward helping those affected by 
    child abuse.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

March 31, 2011

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

JOEL M FLAUM, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 10

‐ 3446

SALLY A. RANDALL and RONA C.

PEPMEIER,

Plaintiffs

‐ Appellants

, and

KAREN GOVERNOR and BARBARA JONES,

Proposed Intervening Plaintiffs/Appellants

,

v.

ROLLS

‐ ROYCE CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants

‐ Appellees

. Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Southern

District of Indiana, Indianapolis

Division.

No. 1:06

‐ cv

‐ 00860

‐ SEB

‐ WGH

Sarah Evans Barker,

Judge

.

O R D E R



### The Court’s opinion issued on March 30, 2011, is hereby amended as follows:

At the end of the first paragraph on page 2, lines 16 and 17, the references to “N.D.”

in the three district court opinions cited should be “S.D.”.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS AUSTIN

HonorableStephen P. Xobsrt Ceunty' Attorney,DoWitt Oouaty Ouero , Taram Dear Sir: Oplnianx0. o-s%% Itor Is a rhorlff

Axtaole 951, CM. .of' a8 r0u0w8: ura 0r eras, reabs ~brabpt a juatlom aots moaoy 

### rer the

against tha d0r08dmt ?cre, of five aa severalare h&d

dollqs, the same to **be paU.ovsr**  in tha auw maaner **am** in the tee, and in thr Jwtloe Oourt We, 1 be the mu or 

### rour dollar8.* Artlole 940, Cob ef Criminal Proaedure of Terae~, road8 a8 followsr "Yoney oolleotwlby an offloer upon rooogaizanoea, ball bonds and othex obllgatioarreaoveradupon ia the ammo of the State uadbr any prori6ionof this Oode, andEon. Stephen P. Robert,May 30, 1939, Page 2.


### a13rh6, rorreitures, judgmeata and oolleatedunder any pro~lsionof thir
__. _ rorthwlthbs paid war by the offloers .oolleatlry the IWO to the oounty treamrar of the propar oauaty, after flrnt deduatiag thersfrosthe legal feee and oonmiaalonafor oollrotingthe ~ame.~ On February4, 1918, tb.lm dqmrtment held In a oonfsrenoo opinionwritten by Hon. C. 1. Taylor, AaslatantAttornor Goaeral, that the sharlff la emtltlbd to 5$ otmmlas5.on OIL trial fee8 uhlah he aotuallp Oollo6t~d. Oq Aptil 5, 1952, thlrr :deparlWnt held in **a** lot&r opinion writtenrby Hen. WIlli DrWhu, ias~rtant **Attommy** Qenefal, that the sherlfrWEE mtitlod to a remmissionoi 5$ on all trial 

### rem aotually oolleotedby him. You are respeotf'ully advised that in riow of Artiole OS?, 0.6.~. of **Texnu,** it 18 the opinion of this dwartaont that a sheriff oi soastablewuld be eatttled to hi8 amal 5$ oolleotion fee on the trfal 

## r00 In the jurtloe ookrt, Is he aotmlly aoUeoteidthe trial rea, earwall aa on the fin, in said o~urt, If he aotually oolleotodthe ii?@ In **said** oowt. Trusting that,th%sanswora y‘our inqlby, we are

APPROV-EO: Wrald C. Mann (signed) AT’ fWHEY GESHHAL OF T?3XAS (stamped:) Approved Oplnlon 06mltt;b By R.W.?.‘ Chala¶Mln
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

____________ No. 22

- 60451 Summary Calendar

____________ Maria Elizabeth Melgar

- Ortiz; Esmeralda Del Carmen Gutierrez

- Melgar; Noel Antonio Gutierrez

- Melgar,

Petitioners ,

versus Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General , Respondent

.

______________________________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency No. A209 436 967 Agency No. A209 436 968 Agency No. A209 436 969

______________________________ Before Smith, Southwick, and Douglas, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : * Maria Elizabeth Melgar

- Ortiz, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals , or

“ BIA

. ” The decision dismiss ed her appeal from an order of an Immigration

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir . R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 17, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-60451 Document: 00516680353 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/17/2023No. 22

- 60451

2 Judge ( “ IJ ” ) denying her application for asylum, withholding o f removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture ( “ CAT ” )

. 1 Because we review the BIA’s decision concerning asylum, withholding, and CAT relief for substantial evidence, we may not disturb this decision unless the evidence

“ compels ” a contra ry conclusion. Zhang v. Gonzales , 432 F.3d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005) (quotation marks and citation s omitted ; emphasis in original).
This standard has not been met. Melgar

- Ortiz shows no error in connection with the BIA’s determination that her proposed particular social groups were not cognizable. A particular social group must be socially distinct. Gonzales

- Veliz v. Barr , 938 F.3d 219, 229 (5th Cir. 2019)

. In addition, a par ticular social group must be more than one person. Martinez Ma nzanares v. Barr , 925 F.3d 222, 227 (5th Cir. 2019) . She thus fails to show that the evidence compels a conclusion contrary to that of the BIA on the issue whether she was eligible for asylum or withholding . Because an applicant for asylum or withholding of removal must first show membership in a relevant social group, Jaco v. Garland , 24 F.4th 395, 402 (5th Cir. 2021 ), we need not consider her remaining arguments concerning these forms of rel ief. Her CAT arguments fail because they do not show that the evidence compels a conclusion contrary to that of the BIA on the issue whether she more likely than not will be tortured if repatriated. See Morales v. Sessions , 860 F.3d 812, 818 (5th Cir. 201 7). The petition for review is DENIED

.

_____________________
1 Melgar

- Ortiz is the mother of the other two petitioners here , who are derivatives on her application. Case: 22-60451 Document: 00516680353 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/17/2023
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________**
No. 22

- 20652

**____________ John Doe 1,**  on behalf of themselves and a Class of all other similarly situated John and or Jane Doe employees of Harris County **; John Doe 2,** on behalf of themselves and a Class of all other similarly situated John and or Jane Doe employees of Harris County **,** Plaintiffs

— Appellants **,**

versus
**Harris County, Texas; Lina Hidalgo,** County Judge **; Rodney Ellis,**  Precinct 1 Commissioner **; Adrian Garcia,** Precinct 2 Commissioner **; Jack Cagle,** Precinct 4, Commissioner **; Tom S. Ramsey,**  Precinct 3, Commissioner **; Edward Gonzalez,** Harris County Sheriff **,** Defend ants

— Appellees

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21

- CV

- 3036

**______________________________** United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 5, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-20652 Document: 00516990286 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/05/2023No. 22

- 20652

2 Before **Jones ,**  **Barksdale ,**  and **Elrod ,**  Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****
The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs , the comprehensive district court opinion, and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no reversible error of law or fact . The district court’s judgment is **AFFIRMED** for essentially the same reasons articulated by that

court.

**_____________________**

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47 .5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. Case: 22-20652 Document: 00516990286 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/05/2023
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF C. A. S., JR AND

S. E. R. S

., CHILDREN

,

Appellant

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 22

- 00027

- C V

Appeal from the

109 th District Court

of Andrews Cou nty, Texas

(TC# 21,851 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the District Clerk’s request for an extension of time within

which to file the Clerk’s Record until February 21 , 2 022

. NO FURTHER REQUESTS

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE C LERK’S RECORD WILL BE CONSIDERED

BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Sherry Du s hane , District Clerk for the 109 th District Court

for Andrew s County, Texas, prepare the Clerk’s Record and forward the same to this Court on or

before February 21 , 20 22

.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 3 rd day of February , 20 22

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodrigu ez , C.J., Palafox and Alle y , JJ.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 120 

Designating March 22, 2007, as National Rehabilitation Counselors 

Appreciation Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2007 

Mr. CHAMBLISS (for himself and Ms. LANDRIEU) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 22, 2007, as National Rehabilitation 

Counselors Appreciation Day. 

Whereas rehabilitation counselors conduct assessments, provide counseling, support to families, and plan and implement rehabilitation programs for those in need; 

Whereas the purpose of the professional organizations in rehabilitation is to promote the improvement of rehabilitation services available to persons with disabilities through 

quality education and rehabilitation research for counselors; 

Whereas the various professional organizations, including the 

National Rehabilitation Association (NRA), Rehabilitation Counselors and Educators Association (RCEA), the 

National Council on Rehabilitation Education (NCRE), 

the National Rehabilitation Counseling Association 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•SRES 120 ATS 

(NRCA), the American Rehabilitation Counseling Association (ARCA), the Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification (CRCC), the Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation (CSAVR), and the 

Council on Rehabilitation Education (CORE) have stood 

firm to advocate up-to-date education and training and 

the maintenance of professional standards in the field of 

rehabilitation counseling and education; 

Whereas on March 22, 1983, Martha Walker of Kent State 

University, who was President of the NCRE, testified before the Subcommittee on Select Education of the House 

of Representatives, and was instrumental in bringing to 

the attention of Congress the need for rehabilitation 

counselors to be qualified; and 

Whereas the efforts of Martha Walker led to the enactment 

of laws that now require rehabilitation counselors to have 

proper credentials in order to provide a higher level of 

quality service to those in need: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates March 22, 2007, as National Re3 habilitation Counselors Appreciation Day; and 

4 (2) commends all of the hard work and dedica5 tion that rehabilitation counselors provide to individ6 uals in need and the numerous efforts that the mul7 tiple professional organizations have made to assist8 ing those who require rehabilitation. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0240 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JASON RALPH EBY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 2 4, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 17 2023

04/17/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0240
I: j 

## 633

..
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS b**  **AUSTIN CSROYLR** 

**SLLL&?R***

**_** **in-*=*** **=rNr ”** **A-r**

,

### HonorableOeo,8. Qmptroller'oi PublioAaoountr **Auatln,** 

### Tonr

**So far**  **a8 prtixmnt**  **to your**  **inquiry, Artiolr**  **7118 reads**  **a8** 

### rollourr "Ifpa&n to OS fortheuseofhusbandorrife, **or uny**  **dlraot** 

### 1%Ieni de808&5IIt Of hU8bfNIdOS Uif+, Or any 

### dir t lin 1 drsoendant of th 

### legallye~dopte~ohi14ofahlldrrnl deo odent, or to or l

### Ry airsot 

### lineal dasoendrntof 8dODted 

### oh114oroh~l&sn of thedeoedeni,Honorable Ceo. H. Sheppard, p. 2

or to 

### the hustmnd of a dauf7:htdr,or 

### the wife of 8 son, the tax shall be one (1) per oent on any value in 8~~888 of Twenty-five Thousand Dollers (&W,OOO) and not In lxoeas 

### 0r rirty Thousand Dollars (~so,ocoj. . . ,”

un4ereoore4 portion artlole Aote The un4ereoore4 portion of this artlole woe added by 1935, 44th Leg., p. 922, Ch. 366, Sso. 1. The tIt18 or this amending sot la, *An Aot amendl~q Art1018 7118. . . by adding to the

*An emending Art1018 Ping exempted and *A* therein, rtopohlldren or 018s~ exempted 

### endtaxed under olaee therein, rtopohlldren 

### deoedent,end their dlraot 4esoen4ante and the direot dssoendante the 

### deoedent, 4esoen4ante dssoendante 

### adoptedohildren. . . .I) (Zmphesie oura). or 

### adoptedohildren. (Zmphesie

The emergenay 01ausS of thin SmendmentreOIte8r
“The raot that the exez@tlon end reduaed rate oi taxation as to rtepohIldrsn and the direot lineal dbsoendantr ot edopted and etepohildren was omitted iron the original Aot, and that suah condition Is an injuetloe toward atepohil4ren and their deaaendante,

. have oauaed great oonfuaion and InJustIoe in &nlsterIn~ the Inheritanoe tax of thI8 atate, and oreste an emerfymoy. . . .* The wife of a Stepson is not a direot lineal dseoendant or a stepson, nor le she inoluded within any of the other groups enumerated in the statute, and the title of the amending aot of 1936 and 4ba emergenay olauas thereof show olsarly that the lsgIeleture did not Intend to inolude her. The words “discrot desoendqnts* and “lInaa1 4escen4antsR hare olearlp derlned meanings in law. See Vol. 12, ‘Norde &Phrases, p. 467: Vol. 26, Worda&Phrases p. 319, The Legislature oann& be preeumed to have meant othsrwlse in using these terma,

Art1018 7122, Y. A. C. S., provideel *If parsing to or for the use or the United states. . . , bs to any other per80n~. . , not 

### Ineluded In any of the olaeeee mentioned In the preoeding portion8 of the orl&nal Aot. . . the tax shall be1 5$ on any valu8 In exaese oi $600 and not exoeeding @O,OOO, 6$ on any value ir exceae of $lo,GoO and not exoeeding $26,OCO . . . an It Is our opinion that the beneflofary In question 1s suoh other pereon rersrred to In Artlole 7122 and #r aubjeot to the pro-:, 

## 641
Honorable 080. 8, Sheppard, Q. 3
vi8lons thereof.

Trusting that we have fully answered your lnqdry, we are c Yours vary truly ATTORNEY

CENEIUL

OBTBXAS Arthur 

### i.Holler

Aesfetent ALMtbb
TO BE PUBLISHED



# Supreme Court of Kentucky

2021

- SC

- 0517

- KB

KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION MOVANT

V. IN SUPREME COURT

THOMAS DUANE JUANSO RESPONDENT

ORDER
Following this Court’s issuance of a notice of review pursuant to SCR 1 3.370(8), and a review of the parties’ briefs filed in support of their respective positions, this Court has elected not to adopt the recommendation of the Board of Governors resolving the disciplinary proceeding against Thomas Duane Juanso. We have prev iously addressed the factual basis of this matter in an opinion and order. Ky. Bar Ass’n v. Juanso , 626 S.W.3d 540 (Ky. 2021). Rather than imposing on Juanso a 90

- day suspension from the practice of law, as recommended by the Board, we believe under the facts of this case, a 180

- day suspension is more fitting. In addition, Juanso is ordered to return Blanchard’s file and retainer; attend and successfully complete the Ethics and

1 Kentucky Rules of the Supreme Court.Professionalism Enhancement Program; and pay all costs associated with this

ac tion, in the amount of $464.09, as required by SCR 3.450. All sitting. Minton, C.J.; Conley, Hughes, Nickell, and VanMeter, JJ., concur. Keller and Lambert, JJ., dissent and would have accepted the
recommendation of the Board of Governors

. ENTERED: M arch 24, 2022

_________ ______________________________ CHIEF JUSTICE