### Miscellaneous OrderNo. DC-18-OO1O-D Court ofAppeals No. 05-17-01080-CV District Court No. DF-00-14691 IN RE: 

## § IN 

### THE DISTRICT COURT 

## § TRACY NIXON, 

## § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 

## § A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT. 

## § 95TH 

### JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER Before the Court is therequest ofTracy Nixon, avexatious litigant, forpermission to seekreview by the Supreme Court ofTexas ofreviewable actions ofthe Court of Appeals forthe fifth District ofTexas atDallas. An individual declared a vexatious Litigantpursuant to Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code 

## § 11.101(a) may be required to obtain permission from the appropriate local administrativejudge before filing, pro se, “new litigation in a court to which the [prefihingi order applies... .“ 

### Id., 

## § 11.102(a). Having consideredthe facts and the law, 

### and having reviewed in detail the filings in the actions at issue, it 

### is the Court’s opinion thatNixon’s request should be GRANTED. Accordingly, TracyNixon is hereby granted permission to seek review by the Supreme Court ofTexas ofactions ofthe Fifth District Court ofAppeals at Dallas in No. 05-17-010$0-CV, which case originated in the family DistrictCourt in Cause No. Df-0O-14691.

ORDER

- 

### Page 1

### IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed this day ofNovember, 2018.
KEN M0LBERG

# \

# / Judge, 95TH 

### District Court Local Administrative 

### DistrictJudge, Dallas County, Texas

ORDER

- 

### Page 2

### Orderentered October 30, 2018

In The 

# €ourtofppcat fifj itritt

# ofZEexaatDaffa No. O5-17-01080-CV

— 

### TRACY NIXON, Appellant V. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 301stJudicial District Court Dallas Conntv Texas Trial CourtCause No. DF-0044691 ORDER Before the CourtEn Banc Befoe the Court is appellant’s October 17, 201$ motion for rehearing en banc. Appellant’s motion is DENIED. /s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CH[EfJUSTICETHE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

tracy nixon , petitioner

vs, the attorney general of the state of texas, respondent kimberlyn rhynes respondent texas comptroller of public account, NO.

respondent texas house of representitives , respondent petitioners motion to extend time to extend time to file petition for revie.
a. iritroouction 1. PETITIONER IS TRACY NIXON RESPONDENT IS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, KIMBERLYN RHYNES, RESPONDENT

PAGE 1. E’Ø’EN TEXAS COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNT , RESPONDENT TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTITIVES , RESPONDENT.2. THIS MOTION IS FILED WITHIN THE 15- DAY PERIOD TO FILE A MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A PETITION FOR REVIEW, AS REOUIREDBY TEXAS RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 53..7ff).
3. THE PARTIES HAVE NOT AGREED TO THIS MOTION. THE PETITIONER WAS NOT ABLE TO CONTACT THE RESPONDENTS BEFORE FILING THIS MOTION BECAUSE OF THE EMERGENCY TO FILE THIS MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR REVIEW. b. aurgument and au thorities
4. THE COURT HAS THE AUTHORITY UNDER RULE 53.7(f) TO GRANT PETITIONER ADDITIONAL TIME TO FILE HIS PETITION FOR REVIEW. 5..THE COURT OF APPEALS ISSUED ITS JUDGMENT ON 

## C:
. j IN NO —

# (Zq ‘U t SITTING EN BANC DENYING THE APPELLANTS MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC. ISSUED BY CHIEF CAROLYN WRIGHT.

PAGE 2. EXTEN6. PETITIONERS MOTION FOR REHE1RING WAS DENIED ON 

### ((ifZr 

# ( ,2018
7. PETITIONER REQUEST ADDITIONAL TIME OF 45 DAYS TO FILE A PETITION FOR REVIEW. 8. PETITIONER NEEDS ADDITIONAL TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR REVIEW BECAUSE THE PETITIONER IS FINANCIALLY UNABLE TO PAY THE FILING FEE. AND COST FOR A SUPERSEADEAS BOND.. 9. THE PETITIONER IS AWAITING APPROVAL FROM LOCAL ADMINIS TRATIVE JUDICIAL COURT JUDGE KEN MOLBERG

. BECAUSE PETITIONER WAS DECLARED A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT BY THE TRIAL COURT HERE ON PETITION FOR REVIEW..

RESPEFUjLY SUBMITTED TRACY NIXON PRO SE 4415 S. MALCOLM XBLVD DALLAS TEXAS 75215 469—685—2850 PAGE 3. EXTENNOT1CE T1fiS DOCUMENT CONTAINS SENSITIVE DATA NCP Name: TRJCY NIXON CP Name: KIAIBERL}WJTh”TS OAGNumber: 46O5l664 CAUSE NUMBER DFI601234

TRACYNIXON Y IN 

### THE 3OlSTDITRICTCJ’?I § OF XtMBERLYN RiIYNES & the OFFICE OF (HE DALLAS’ COUNTY, TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL ORDER DECtARING TRACY NIXON AS A VEXATiOUS LITIGANT AND PRE-FILTNG 0 R D £ R Came to be heard Defendant’s Motion to DeclareTracy Nixon a Vexatious Litigant, and the 

### Court first declares Mr. Tracy Nixon to he a vexatious litigant pursuant to the procedures set 

### forth in Texas Rules o 

### Civil Procedure 

## § 11, is oCthc opinion that the following order shall issue: It is ORDl.RED that Mr. Tracy Nixon is herchy prohibited from Iling inprnprktpeiono 

### any new litigation ina

### courtofthis State withoutfirstobtainingperrnssion 

### Promalocal administrativeiudge pucsuanto CPRC 

## § I L102. lfMr. Tracy Nixon does 

### fIle new litigation in violation ofthis order, that suitwill ho stibjectto dismissal andMr. 

### TracyNixon will he subjectto sanctions as proscribed by Texas Civil Practice kind Remedies Code 11.101(b). BecauseMr. 

### Nixonclearly fitsthe statutorydeiinkion oFavexatious litigant,heis te;uired to Furnish 

### security forthebenefitoFthe moingdefendaflt and the 

### Courtwill dismiss this suitifhadoes not

### furnish the security 

### within the time set 

### by the order- CPRC 

## § 1 1.055-56. In the underlying case, Mr. Nixon is ordered to furnish a $3000f) security forthe benefit ofthe 

### moving defendant which will be deposited into the Dallas County Trust Rcgistry
2