alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 21 THE LIBERTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
DECEMBER 31, 2004 Percentage of Voting StockOwned by ImmediateJurisdiction of Incorporation
    
    ParentThe Liberty Corporation
    
    South CarolinaCosmos Broadcasting Corporation
    
    South Carolina
    
    100CableVantage Inc.
    
    South Carolina
    
    100Broadcast Merchandising Corporation
    
    South Carolina
    
    100Civic Communications Corporation II
    
    Delaware
    
    100TV-3, Inc.
    
    Mississippi
    
    100WLBT, Inc.
    
    Mississippi
    
    100Civic License Holding
Company, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    100CivCo, Inc.
    
    Nevada
    
    100LibCo, Inc.
    
    Nevada
    
    100WLOX, Inc.
    
    Mississippi
    
    100Tall Tower, LLC
    
    Texas
    
    50Exchange Place Corporation
    
    North Carolina
    
    100Greensboro Holdings, Inc.
    
    South Carolina
    
    100State National Title Guaranty Company
    
    Louisiana
    
    100Special Services Corporation
    
    South Carolina
    
    100Hampton Insurance Agency, Inc.
    
    South Carolina
    
    100Bent Tree Corporation
    
    Georgia
    
    100TLC Business Ventures, Inc.
    
    South Carolina
    
    100Liberty Properties Group, Inc.
    
    South Carolina
    
    100Commerce Center of Greenville, Inc.
    
    South Carolina
    
    100LIBCO of Florida, Inc.
    
    Florida
    
    100LPC of S. C., Inc.
    
    South Carolina
    
    100TLC Costal Properties Group, LLC
    
    South Carolina
    
    100TLC Midland Properties Group, LLC
    
    South Carolina
    
    100LibertyWest, Inc.
    
    Nevada
    
    100
 53
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-10485

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Luis Pena-Aleman, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

No. 3:19-CR-124-1

Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Luis Pena-Aleman has moved to 

withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), 

and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pena-Aleman has 

not filed a response. 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances 

set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 10, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-10485 Document: 00516234107 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/10/2022
No. 21-10485

2

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record. 

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-10485 Document: 00516234107 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/10/2022
#### § 37.88 Who may contact CRC about a complaint?

Both the complainant and the respondent, or their authorized representatives, may contact CRC for information about the complaint. The Director will determine what information, if any, about the complaint will be released.
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 57 FR 31451, July 16, 1992.

#### § 20.35 Additional administrative collection action.

Nothing contained in this subpart is intended to preclude the utilization of any other administrative remedy which may be available.
(77 South. 421)

#### SOUTHERN RY. CO. v. HUDSON.

(1 Div. 220.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Dec. 18, 1917.)

Railroads <&wkey;446(3) — Killing Cattle — Sufficiency of Evidence.

Evidence that remains of plaintiff's cow were found near railroad tracks of defendant, and of another railroad some two weeks after the cow disappeared, etc., *held*to make defendant’s liability a jury question.

Samford, J., dissenting.

Appeal from Law and Equity Court, Mobile County; Saffold Berney, Judge.

Action by Jesse Hudson against the Southern Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Bestor & Young and James E. Duggan, all of Mobile, for appellant. Stevens, McCorvey *&*McLeod and D. B. Goode, all of Mobile, for appellee.

SAMPORD, J.

The evidence tended to show that appellee’s cow strayed from home about November 11, 1914, and never returned ; that a little more than two weeks thereafter appellee found the remains of a carcass of a cow about 15 feet from appellant’s track in the city of Mobile, witbin the yards of the Mobile & Ohio Railroad, and in a marsh adjoining said track; that the cow was identified as being the property of the plaintiff by a few spots of red hair on the face and by a rag tied on to one of the stubs of a horn that had been shucked off; that the flesh had all gone from the bones, and that one of the hip bones had been broken. There was evidence of other railroad tracks belonging to another railroad running within 8 feet of defendant’s track, and on the other side from the carcass. This was the entire evidence upon the question as to whether the defendant’s engine struck the cow at all.

The right of recovery in this case is dependent upon the establishment of causal connection between tbe injury to the cow and the alleged cause. Southworth, Adm’x, v. Shea, 131 Ala. 421, 30 South. 774, and author-' ities there cited. This the facts in this case fail to do, nor are they sufficient to support a verdict.

The foregoing is the opinion of the writer, but the majority think the facts are sufficient to submit it to the jury, on the authority of Southern Ry. Co. v. Blankenship, 14 Ala. App. 261, 69 South. 591; Id.,194 Ala. 368, 70 South. 132, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed January 25, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-2262

Lower Tribunal No. 18-20525

________________

George Schell, et al.,

Appellants,

vs.

Universal North America Insurance Company,

f/k/a Universal Insurance Company of North America,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Peter R. 

Lopez, Judge.

Alexander Appellate Law P.A., and Samuel Alexander (DeLand), for 

appellants.

Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & Smith, PLC, and David T. Burr 

(Tampa), for appellee.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 21

Principal Subsidiaries of the Company (Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

  Lawter International FSC, Limited (Jamaica)
    Kingston, Jamaica

  Lawter International (Kallo) N.V. (Belgium)
    Kallo, Belgium

  Lawter International (Canada) Inc. (Canada)
    Rexdale, Ontario, Canada

  Lawter International Fujian Nanping PRC Limited
    Peoples Republic of China
    Dazhou, China

  Lawter International, Ltd. (Tianjin) P.R.C. (Peoples Republic of China)
    Tanggu, Peoples Republic of China

  Lawter International, A.p.S. (Denmark)
    Koge, Denmark

    Lawter International, Sarl (France)
    Charenton-le-Pont, France

  Lawter International, GmbH (Germany)
    Frechen, Germany

  Lawter International, Limited (Great Britain)
    Bicester, Oxon, England

  Lawter International (Italia), Srl (Italy)
    Cremona, Italy

  Lawter International, B.V. (Netherlands)
    Waterford, Ireland

  Lawter Antilles, N.V. (Netherlands Antilles)
    Curacao, Netherlands Antilles

  Lawter International Products
    Pte. Ltd. (Singapore)
    Jurong Town, Singapore

  Lawter International (Proprietary) Limited (South Africa)
    Ndabeni, South Africa

  Lawter International, S.A. (Spain)
    Barcelona, Spain
----

Removal from the register of Case C-13/02 (1)

(2004/C 273/48)

By order of 22 July 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-13/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrative Regionale per la Lombardia, Sezione staccata di Brescia): Casearia Bresciana Ca.Bre.Soc.Coop.a.r.l. and Other v A.I.M.A. (Azienda di Stato per gli interventi nel mercato agricolo).

----

(1)OJ C 68 of 16.3.2002.

----
#### § 37.96 What are the required elements of a written assurance?

A written assurance must provide documentation that the violations listed in the Letter of Findings, Notice to Show Cause or Initial Determination, as applicable, have been corrected.
Calendar | Newsroom | Contact Us | ...Search this site

Through our regional offices

nationwide, we build large and

small projects for a variety of

public and private sector

customers.

new search

Bakersfield Area Office

3005 James Road

Bakersfield, CA 93308

661-399-3361

Arvin Facility

21541 East Bear Mountain Boulevard

Arvin, CA 93203

661-854-3051

Ridgecrest Facility

10000 North Brown Road

Inyokem, CA 93527

760-382-4198

Palmdale Office

213 E Avenue M

Lancaster, CA 93535

661-726-4447

Ventura Facility

999 Mission Rock Road

Santa Paula, CA 93060

805-879-0033

You searched near:

bakersfield

Asphalt

Concrete Aggregate Recycling

Construction

Supplies

Office Emulsio n Warm Mix

1

2

3

4

5

© 2015 Granite Construction | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Site Credits

Locations

Our Company Projects Materials Locations Sustainability Investors Careers

to modify your current search, toggle the buttons above X

Locations | Granite - Granite Construction builds roads, tunnels, bridge... http://www.graniteconstruction.com/Locations?q=bakersfield

1 of 1 10/8/2015 7:45 AM
§ 38.78 Determinations regarding acceptance of complaints. The Director must decide whether CRC will accept a particular complaint for resolution. For example, a complaint need not be accepted if: ( a ) It has not been timely filed;
( b ) CRC has no jurisdiction over the complaint; or
( c ) CRC has previously decided the matter.
# EUR-Lex - 31999R2005 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999R2005

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2005/1999 of 20 September 1999 fixing the minimum selling prices for beef put up for sale under the third invitation to tender referred to in Regulation (EC) No 1587/1999 **

*
Official Journal L 248 , 21/09/1999 P. 0003 - 0004 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2005/1999

of 20 September 1999

fixing the minimum selling prices for beef put up for sale under the third invitation to tender referred to in Regulation (EC) No 1587/1999

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1633/98(2), and in particular Article 7(3) thereof,

(1) Whereas tenders have been invited for certain quantities of beef fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1587/1999(3);

(2) Whereas, pursuant to Article 9 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2173/79(4), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2417/95(5), the minimum selling prices for meat put up for sale by tender should be fixed, taking into account tenders submitted;

(3) Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Beef and Veal,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The minimum selling prices for beef for the invitation to tender held in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1587/1999 for which the time limit for the submission of tenders was 13 September 1999 are as set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 September 1999.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 September 1999.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 148, 28.6.1968, p. 24.

(2) OJ L 210, 28.7.1998, p. 17.

(3) OJ L 188, 21.7.1999, p. 20.

(4) OJ L 251, 5.10.1979, p. 12.

(5) OJ L 248, 14.10.1995, p. 39.

ANEXO/BILAG/ANHANG/ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ/ANNEX/ANNEXE/ALLEGATO/BIJLAGE/ANEXO/LIITE/BILAGA

>TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 57 FR 31451, July 16, 1992.

#### § 20.210 Exclusions from garnishment.

The Department may not garnish the wages of a debtor who it knows has been involuntarily separated from employment until the debtor has been reemployed continuously for at least 12 months. The debtor has the burden of informing the Department (or any other federal agency exercising the Department's authority under this subpart) of the circumstances surrounding an involuntary separation from employment.
----

NOTICE

On 16 November 2004, in the Official Journal of the European Union C 279 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — 14th supplement to the 22nd complete edition’ will be published.

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/..........). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see overleaf).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L,C,CA,CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

----
ACCEPTED 07-15-00029-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS

AMARILLO, TEXAS 4/2/2015 4:04:47 PM Vivian Long, Clerk
Ex10.2VogensenParticipationAgreement


Exhibit 10.2


CHICO’S FAS, INC. 
EXECUTIVE BONUS PROGRAMS
PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
This Participation Agreement is entered into this 27th day of March, 2015, by and between Chico’s FAS, Inc. (the “Company”) and Todd E. Vogensen (the “Participant”).
WHEREAS, the Participant is a key employee of the Company selected by the Company to participate in one or more executive bonus programs (the “Programs”); and
WHEREAS, as a condition to receiving any bonus payable pursuant to any of the Programs, the Participant acknowledges and agrees to be bound by the following condition:
Repayment of Bonus.  If (a) within the two-year period immediately following payment of any Bonus under any Program the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company, as a result of misconduct, with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, and (b) the Participant is subject to automatic forfeiture under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or knowingly engaged in the misconduct, was grossly negligent in engaging in the misconduct, knowingly failed to prevent the misconduct or was grossly negligent in failing to prevent the misconduct, then the Participant shall reimburse the Company for the amount of any such Bonus paid under any Program.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Participation Agreement on the date first written above.
	
			
	CHICO’S FAS, INC.

	By:
	 
	/s/David F. Dyer

	Title:
	 
	President & Chief Executive Officer






	
			
	PARTICIPANT:

	 
	 
	/s/ Todd E. Vogensen

	 
	 
	Participant’s Signature

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Todd E. Vogensen

	 
	 
	Participant’s Name – Please Print
(77 South. 921)

#### MANCHESTER SAW MILLS v. WOOD.

(6 Div. 388.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 15, 1918.)

Trial <&wkey;143 — Questions for Jury — Conflicting Evidence.

Where there is any conflict in the testimony, questions of fact must be presented to the jury.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Walker County; J. J. Curtis, Judge.

Action by H. B. AA'ood, as trustee in bankruptcy of the Walker Lumber Company, against the Manchester Saw Mills, to recover a preference within four months before the filing of the bankruptcy proceedings. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

John H. Bankhead, Jr., of Jasper,,for appellant. Wm. F. Finch, of Jasper, for appellee.

SAMFORD, J.

The only question presented by this record is the insistence by the defendant that on all the evidence it was entitled to the general affirmative charge. The rule in this state is that where there is any conflict in the testimony, questions of fact must be presented to the jury. We have examined the evidence, and are of the' opinion that the facts testified to were properly submitted to the jury, under the charge of the court.

This case relating to questions of fact only, the opinion will not be published, under authority of Acts of the Legislature of 1915, p. 595, § 3.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 11.
 Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings
<TABLE>


 For the periods ended June 30
<CAPTION>

                                             2nd Qtr.                      Six months
                                         1999            1998           1999      1998

 Diluted earnings per common share:
<S>                                   <C>              <C>           <C>        <C>

 Average common shares outstanding      643,053        106,386        500,732    106,386


 Net income (loss) ................   $(246,868)       $ 3,604       $ 48,596   $ 10,910

 Diluted earnings (loss) per share:   $   (0.38)       $  0.03       $   0.10   $   0.10

 Basic earnings (loss) per share:     $   (0.38)       $  0.03       $   0.10   $   0.10

</TABLE>
(75 South. 1005)

#### CRABTREE v. STATE.

(6 Div. 346.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 8, 1917.)

Appeal from Tuscaloosa County Court; Henry B. Foster, Judge. Virgil Crabtree was con-

victed of an offense, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

*691Vemer *&*Rice, of Tuscaloosa, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for die State.

BROWN, P. J.

The court has examined the record, and finds that the proceedings of the trial court are regular, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                          156141
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    50064
<ALLOWANCES>                                     40332
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                165873
<PP&E>                                         3098265
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2027336
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1236802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            77005
<BONDS>                                         385511
<COMMON>                                       1300019
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (525733)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1236802
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                326324
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   425213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 20550
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               35138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (154577)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (154577)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (154577)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 404.5 Attorney-client communications exempted.

Nothing contained in this part shall be construed to require an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of any State, to include in any report required to be filed pursuant to the provisions of section 202(a) of the Act and of this part any information which was lawfully communicated to such attorney by any of his clients in the course of a legitimate attorney-client relationship.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2009-3022 

ELIZABETH L. COUNCIL, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 

Respondent. 

Michael L. Spekter, Michael L. Spekter, Attorney at Law, of Washington, DC, 

argued for petitioner. 

Christopher A. Bowen, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil 

Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for 

respondent. With him on the brief were Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Todd M. 

Hughes, Deputy Director. 

Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2009-3022 

ELIZABETH L. COUNCIL, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 

 Respondent. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 

in CASE NO(S). PH0831080265-I-1 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (LOURIE, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges). 

 AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

DATED May 6, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Farrah 

Fruta 

Food and Nutrition Service Frutas
 

Palabras de vocabulario: 

la, las, es, comer, son, yo 
Este libro pertenece a: 
La manzana es roja.
 
La naranja es naranja.
 
La piña es amarilla.
 
Las uvas son verdes.
 
Las bayas son azules.
 
Las ciruelas son moradas.
 
Yo como fruta.
 
Yo como un arcoiris. ¡Rico!
 

Descubre otros materiales 

de educación nutricional 

desarrollados bajo la iniciativa 

de Team Nutrition del 

Departamento de Agricultura 

de los Estados Unidos en: 

https://teamnutrition.usda.gov. 

Mayo 2018 · FNS474B-S 

USDA es un proveedor, empleador y prestamista que ofrece igualdad de oportunidades.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 861 

To designate the Federal building located at 131 East 4th Street in 

Davenport, Iowa, as the ‘‘James A. Leach Federal Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 13, 2007 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Mr. HARKIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building located at 131 East 4th 

Street in Davenport, Iowa, as the ‘‘James A. Leach 

Federal Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The Federal building located at 131 East 4th Street 

5 in Davenport, Iowa, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘James A. Leach Federal Building’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 861 IS

1 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be 

2 a reference to the ‘‘James A. Leach Federal Building’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### § 4071.2 Definitions.

The following terms are defined in § 4001.2 of this chapter: ERISA and PBGC.
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

#### §§ 4.124-4.129 [Reserved]