alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. G LEN RA Y BRI G G S, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N os . 11- 30382 11- 30383 11- 30384 11- 30385 D . C. N o s . 2 : 0 7 - c r - 0 2 0 6 5 - LRS 2 : 0 7 - c r - 0 2 0 6 3 - LRS 2 : 0 7 - c r - 0 2 1 1 4 - LRS 2 : 0 7 - c r - 0 2 0 6 6 - LRS ME MOR AN DU M * A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe E a s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on L onnyR . S uko, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r9, 2012 ** B efo re: R A W L IN S O N , M U R G U IA , an dW A T F O R D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. I n th e s e c o n s o lid a te dap p e a ls , G le n R ayB r ig g s ap p e a ls f r o m th e 2 4 0 - m o n th se nt ence i m po se d fol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on s f or vari ou s drug, fi re arm 

# FI LED OC T 17 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 30382, 11- 30383, 11- 30384, 11- 30385 2 a n de s c ap e o f

f e n s e s . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. B r ig g s c o n te n d s th a t h is s e n te n c e is s ub s tan tiv e lyu n r e a s o n ab le b e c au s e h is G u i d el i n es sen t en ci n g ran g e w as b asedo n a fi ct i o n al am o u n to f d ru g s, an db ecau se the s e nt e nc e i s gr e a t e rthan ne c e s s aryt o a c c om pl i s h the goa l s of s e nt e nc i ng. T he di s tr i c tc ourtc ons i de r e d B r i ggs ’ s m i t i ga t i on ar gum e nt s , i nc l udi ng hi s c ont e nt i ons re gardi ng the fi ct i on alnature of the drug s, i n i m po si ng a bel ow -G ui del i nes se nt ence . In l i gh tof the t ot al i ty of the ci rc um st ance s and the 18 U . S . C . § 3 55 3(a) s e n te n c in g f

a c to r s , th e s e n te n c e is s ub s tan tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le . See G al l v. U ni ted States , 55 2 U . S . 38 , 51 (200 7). AF F I RME D.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12999]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 24, 2000 / 
Notices

[[Page 33522]]



AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Board for International Food and Agricultural Development, One 
Hundred and Thirty Second Meeting; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby 
given of the one hundred and thirty second meeting of the Board for 
International Food and Agricultural Development (BIFAD). The meeting 
will be held from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on June 8th, 2000, and from 9 
a.m. to 12:40 p.m. on June 9th, 2000, in the Hemisphere A room in the 
Ronald Reagan Building, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
    As part of its agenda, BIFAD will look at the coming crisis in 
water and its implications for agriculture. BIFAD will also examine the 
food security crisis in the Horn of Africa, its political and 
agroclimatic underpinnings, food aid, post crisis development, and 
medium-term climate prediction. BIFAD will also hear about building new 
coalitions for foreign aid.
    Those wishing to attend the meeting or obtain additional 
information about BIFAD should contact Mr. Charles Uphaus, the Acting 
Designated Federal Officer for BIFAD. He can be reached at the Agency 
for International Development, Ronald Reagan Building, Office of 
Agriculture and Food Security, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 
2.11-01. Washington DC, 20523-2110, by telephone at (202) 712-1172, by 
fax (202) 216-3060, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83e0f6f3ebe2f6f0c3f6f0e2eae7ade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ea899f9a828b9f99aa9f998b838ec48d859c">[email protected]</span></a>.

Charles Uphaus,
USAID Acting Designated Federal Officer for BIFAD, Office of 
Agriculture and Food Security, Economic Growth Center, Bureau for 
Global Programs.
[FR Doc. 00-12999 Filed 5-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 4064.1 Cross-references. ( a ) Part 4062, subpart A, of this chapter sets forth rules for determination and payment of the liability incurred under section 4062(b) of ERISA, upon termination of any single-employer plan and, to the extent appropriate, determination of the liability incurred with respect to multiple employer plans under sections 4063 and 4064 of ERISA.
( b ) Part 4068 of this chapter includes rules regarding the PBGC's lien under section 4068 of ERISA with respect to liability arising under section 4062, 4063, or 4064.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Herbert Lindo, certifythat:

 

1.                  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Kof Kenilworth Systems Corporation;

 

2.                  Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements are made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.                  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report;

 

4.                  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)                Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures or caused such disclosure controls to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)               Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)                Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.                  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)                All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)               Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: March 19,2008 | By:    | /s/ Herbert Lindo                     |
|-------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                          |   | Chairman and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

***Remainder of page intentionally left blank***

 

----
#### § 35.17 Age distinctions in DOL regulations.

Any age distinction in regulations issued by DOL is presumed to be necessary to the achievement of a statutory objective of the program or activity to which the regulations apply, notwithstanding the provisions of § 35.12.
§ 30.13 Equal employment opportunity compliance reviews. ( a ) *Conduct of compliance reviews.* The Registration Agency will regularly conduct EEO compliance reviews to determine if the sponsor maintains compliance with this part, and will also conduct EEO compliance reviews when circumstances so warrant. An EEO compliance review may consist of, but is not limited to, comprehensive analyses and evaluations of each aspect of the apprenticeship program through off-site reviews, such as desk audits of records submitted to the Registration Agency, and on-site reviews conducted at the sponsor's establishment that may involve examination of records required under this part; inspection and copying of documents related to recordkeeping requirements of this part; and interviews with employees, apprentices, journeyworkers, supervisors, managers, and hiring officials.
( b ) *Notification of compliance review findings.* Within 45 business days of completing an EEO compliance review, the Registration Agency must present a written Notice of Compliance Review Findings to the sponsor's contact person through registered or certified mail, with return receipt requested. If the compliance review indicates a failure to comply with this part, the registration agency will so inform the sponsor in the Notice and will set forth in the Notice the following: ( 1 ) The deficiency(ies) identified;
( 2 ) How to remedy the deficiency(ies);
( 3 ) The timeframe within which the deficiency(ies) must be corrected; and
( 4 ) Enforcement actions may be undertaken if compliance is not achieved within the required timeframe.
( c ) *Compliance.* ( 1 ) When a sponsor receives a Notice of Compliance Review Findings that indicates a failure to comply with this part, the sponsor must, within 30 business days of notification, either implement a compliance action plan and notify the Registration Agency of that plan or submit a written rebuttal to the Findings. Sponsors may also seek to extend this deadline one time by up to 30 days for good cause shown. If the Registration Agency upholds the Notice after receiving a written response, the sponsor must implement a compliance action plan within 30 days of receiving the notice from the Registration Agency upholding its Findings. The compliance action plan must include, but is not limited to, the following provisions: ( i ) A specific commitment, in writing, to correct or remediate identified deficiency(ies) and area(s) of noncompliance;
( ii ) The precise actions to be taken for each deficiency identified;
( iii ) The time period within which the cited deficiency(ies) will be remedied and any corrective program changes implemented; and
( iv ) The name of the individual(s) responsible for correcting each deficiency identified.
( 2 ) Upon the Registration Agency's approval of the compliance action plan, the sponsor may be considered in compliance with this part provided that the compliance action plan is implemented.
( d ) *Enforcement actions.* Any sponsor that fails to implement its compliance action plan within the specified timeframes may be subject to an enforcement action under § 30.15.
§ 1620.2 General coverage of employees “engaged in commerce.” ( a ) Like the FLSA, the EPA applies to employees “engaged in commerce.” “Commerce” is broadly defined in section 3(b) of the FLSA. It includes both interstate and foreign commerce and is not limited to transportation across State lines, or to activity of a commercial character. All parts of the movement among the several States, or between any State and any place outside thereof, of persons or things, tangibles or intangibles, including communication of information and intelligence, constitute movement in “commerce” within the statutory definition. This includes those parts of any such activity which take place wholly within a single State. In addition, the instrumentalities for carrying on such commerce are so inseparable from the commerce itself that employees working on such instrumentalities within the borders of a single State, by virtue of the contribution made by their work to the movement of the commerce, are “engaged in commerce” within the meaning of the FLSA.
( b ) Consistent with the purpose of the FLSA to apply Federal standards “throughout the farthest reaches of the channels of interstate commerce,” the courts have made it clear that the employees “engaged in commerce” include every employee employed in the channels of such commerce or in activities so closely related to such commerce as to be considered a part of it as a practical matter. Engaging “in commerce” includes activities connected therewith such as management and control of the various physical processes, together with the accompanying accounting and clerical activities. Thus, employees engaged in interstate or foreign commerce will typically include, among others, employees in distributing industries such as wholesaling or retailing who sell, transport, handle, or otherwise work on goods moving in interstate or foreign commerce as well as workers who order, receive, guard, pack, ship or keep records of such goods; employees who handle payroll or personnel functions for workers engaged in such activities; clerical and other workers who regularly use the mails, telephone, or telegraph for communication across State lines; and employees who regularly travel across State lines while working. For other examples, see 29 CFR part 776.
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

. SE 04 331A0 24
<PAGE>1


Exhibit 32 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/a of Citizens First
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report") I, Mary D. Cohron, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:  /s/Mary D. Cohron
     -----------------
        Mary D. Cohron
    Chief Executive Officer



Date:  November 14, 2006

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Citizens First
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report") I, Steve Marcum, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:  /s/ Steve Marcum
     -----------------
         Steve Marcum
    Chief Financial Officer


Date: November 14, 2006
                                        1
1 

### Brown, Kelly

From: Sasser, Erika Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 4:42 PM To: Brown, Kelly Subject: FW: Ozone NAAQS-- Technical Memo Attachments: Wells_Comparison of Ozone Metrics_memo_102314.pdf

Please post email and attachment(s) to Ozone NAAQS Rulemaking docket. Thanks

From: Sasser, Erika Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 10:52 AM To: 'Frey, Nathan J.' Cc: Hemby, James; Kimber Scavo; Simon, Heather; Wesson , Karen Subject: Ozone NAAQS-- Technical Memo

Nathan—

Attached is the technical memo (Wells memo) on the comparison between the primary and secondary AQ met rics. We will submit this to the docket prior to rule signat ure, but interagency partners may wish to read it i n connection with their review of the secondary standards section of the draft NPRM.

Thanks, Erika
#### § 42.1 General statement.

These regulations are promulgated by the Secretary of Labor to describe the coordination of the activities of the Employment Standards Administration, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and the Employment and Training Administration relating to migrant farmworkers.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33342-33343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12904]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Initial Review Group Kidney, Urologic and 
Hematologic Diseases D Subcommittee.
    Date: June 8-9, 2000.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Double Tree Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Ann A. Hagan, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of

[[Page 33343]]

Health, Building 45, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-8886.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Initial Review Group Diabetes, Endocrinology 
anhd Metabolic Diseases B Subcommittee.
    Date: June 9, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Ramada, Inn., 8400 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Ned Feder, MD, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Room 645, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, 
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Initial Review Group, Digestive Diseases and 
Nutrition C Subcommittee.
    Date: June 13-14, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn--Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, 
MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Dan Matsumoto, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Room 649, 6707 Democracy 
Boulevard, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600, 
(301) 594-8894.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 12, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-12904 Filed 5-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
(77 South. 421)

#### GRAHAM v. WALL.

(5 Div. 217.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Dec. 18, 1917.)

Appeal and Error &wkey;>637 — Bill of Exceptions — Necessity.

Assignments of error in a bill of exceptions which was not presented and signed by the trial court within 90 days as required by Code 1907, § 3019, cannot be reviewed.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Coosa County; S. L. Brewer, Judge.

Action by N. II. Graham against Alex: Wall. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Action of assumpsit by the appellant against the appellee. Prom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

*272John A. Darden, of Alexander City, for appellant. Riddle & Riddle, of Talladega, for appellee.

SAMFORD, J.

Counsel for appellee call our attention to the fact that the record shows the bill of exceptions not to have been presented to the trial judge within 90 days from the date of judgment. It appears from the record that the judgment was rendered on December 2, 1915, and the bill of exceptions presented to the trial judge March 9, 1916. Under the decisions of both this and the Supreme Court, the presentation and indorsement in question is mandatory (Code 1907, § 3019), without which there is in fact no, bill of exceptions (Box et al. v. Southern Railway Co., 184 Ala. 599, 64 South. 69; Smith v. State, 166 Ala. 26, 52 South. 396). It was held in the Box Case, supra, that such facts are jurisdictional. Where, therefore, it appears that the bill of exceptions as set out in the record was not presented and signed within the time prescribed by the statute, this court' cannot consider the assignments of error presented by the pseudo bill. Authorities, supra.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.