alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32**


**STATEMENT
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol Federal Financial (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      we, John B. Dicus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kent G. Townsend,
      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





|1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
              Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
              as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements
              included in such Report.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------













Date:   May
      5, 2006  
              
                  
 By: /s/
      John B.
      Dicus


John
      B. Dicus, President and


Chief
      Executive Officer











Date:   May
      5, 2006     
                  
            
By: /s/
      Kent G.
      Townsend


Kent
      G. Townsend, Executive Vice President,


Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer
§ 4901.23 Record of concern to agency other than PBGC. When reviewing a record in response to a disclosure request, PBGC will determine whether another agency is better able to determine whether the record is exempt from disclosure under FOIA. As to any such record, PBGC will proceed in one of the following ways: ( a ) *Consultation with another agency.* When the record contains information of interest to another agency, PBGC will make a release determination only if its interest in the record is the primary interest and only after PBGC consults with that agency.
( b ) *Referral to another agency.* ( 1 ) When an agency other than PBGC has primary interest in the record, then PBGC will refer the responsibility for responding to the disclosure request regarding that record to that agency.
( 2 ) Whenever PBGC refers any part of the responsibility for responding to a disclosure request to another agency, PBGC will document the referral, maintain a copy of the record that it refers, and notify the requester of the referral, informing the requester of the name(s) of the agency to which the record was referred, including that agency's FOIA office.
[87 FR 43997, July 25, 2022]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1326
In Re: NORWOOD COOK, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:02-cr-30087-jpj-mfu-1) Submitted: March 28, 2008 Decided: April 16, 2008 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Norwood Cook, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Norwood Cook petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order to compel the district court to enforce his plea agreement. We conclude that Cook is not entitled to mandamus relief and deny his petition. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Cook alleges the Government breached his plea agreement when it used self-incriminating evidence against him in the presentence investigation report. However, we previously denied Cook relief on this claim when he asserted it in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The district court properly construed Cook’s complaint as a § 2255 motion and dismissed it as successive because Cook sought recalculation of his guidelines sentence, and such challenges to the fact or duration of confinement should be asserted in a habeas corpus proceeding. SeePreiser v. Rodriguez , 411 U.S. 475, 487 (1973). The relief Cook seeks is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.- 3 - To the extent that Cook’s writ of mandamus could be construed as a motion for authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, we deny such authorization. SeeIn re Williams , 330 F.3d 277, 281-82 (4th Cir. 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE STATEMENT
OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND THE CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          16,186
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  305,387
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,241
<INVENTORY>                                    269,284
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               616,405
<PP&E>                                         959,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                 533,925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,224,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          360,173
<BONDS>                                        302,352
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       144,125
<OTHER-SE>                                     256,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,224,151
<SALES>                                      1,884,013
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,884,013
<CGS>                                        1,407,670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,407,670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                128,196
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             94,896
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    94,896
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.20
        

</TABLE>
#### SANDERS v. THE STATE.

(Decided January 30, 1917.)

Appeal from Coffee Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. A. B. Foster.

No counsel marked for appellant.

W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, P. J.

No bill of exceptions and no error of record. Affirmed.
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 194A/30 l

| | ISSN 1725-2466 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | C 194A |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 47o anno30 luglio 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2466

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

C 194A

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

47o anno30 luglio 2004

---

| Numero d'informazione | Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Informazioni |
| | Consiglio |
| 2004/C 194A/1 | Avviso di posto disponibile — Agenzia europea per la difesa — Direttori | 1 |
| | Osservatorio europeo dei fenomeni di razzismo e xenofobia |
| 2004/C 194A/2 | Appello a canditature HOUA-A-2004 | 2 |

Numero d'informazione

Sommario

pagina

III   Informazioni

Consiglio

2004/C 194A/1

Avviso di posto disponibile — Agenzia europea per la difesa — Direttori

1

Osservatorio europeo dei fenomeni di razzismo e xenofobia

2004/C 194A/2

Appello a canditature HOUA-A-2004

2

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

III Informazioni

Consiglio

| 30.7.2004 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CA 194/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2004

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CA 194/1

---

AVVISO DI POSTO DISPONIBILE

Agenzia europea per la difesa

Direttori

(2004/C 194 A/01)

L'Agenzia europea per la difesa intende coprire quattro posti di direttore in seno alle sue quattro direzioni:

| — | Sviluppo delle capacità militari (rif. EDA/A/2004/012), |
| --- | --- |

—

Sviluppo delle capacità militari (rif. EDA/A/2004/012),

| — | Ricerca e tecnologia (rif. EDA/A/2004/0029), |
| --- | --- |

—

Ricerca e tecnologia (rif. EDA/A/2004/0029),

| — | Armamenti (rif. EDA/A/2004/042), |
| --- | --- |

—

Armamenti (rif. EDA/A/2004/042),

| — | Industria e mercato della difesa (rif. EDA/A/2004/051). |
| --- | --- |

—

Industria e mercato della difesa (rif. EDA/A/2004/051).

Ulteriori informazioni (disponibili in lingua inglese) e i formulari di candidatura possono essere ottenuti sul sito web del Consiglio al seguente indirizzo: http://ue.eu.int (contatti/offerte di lavoro).

Termine: 3 settembre 2004, il timbro postale facente fede.

---

Osservatorio europeo dei fenomeni di razzismo e xenofobia

| 30.7.2004 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CA 194/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2004

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CA 194/2

---

APPELLO A CANDITATURE HOUA-A-2004

(2004/C 194 A/02)

L'Osservatorio europeo dei fenomeni di razzismo e xenofobia (EUMC) cerca candidati in attesa di riempire alcuni posti. Informazioni dettagliate su questi posti, le missioni dell'Osservatorio e la relativa procedura da seguire per presentare l'atto di candidatura sono pubblicate nel sito Europa al seguente indirizzo: http://eumc.eu.int.

---
SCH-AmendNYfinal




GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY 
INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK                                                             
A Stock Company
 [50 Main Street, 10th Floor]
[White Plains, NY]
[1-800-723-8723]






Contract Amendment


THIS AMENDMENT IS ISSUED BY GREAT‐WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK AS PART OF THE INDIVIDUAL FLEXIBLE PREMIUM VARIABLE ANNUITY CONTRACT (THE “CONTRACT”) TO WHICH IT IS ATTACHED.   EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY AMENDED BY THIS AMENDMENT, THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.  IF THERE IS ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS AMENDMENT AND THE CONTRACT, THE TERMS OF THIS AMENDMENT WILL PREVAIL.


1.      The Right to Cancel on the front cover of the Contract is deleted and replaced with the following:
There is a 10 day right to cancel. If the Contract is issued as a replacement of existing life insurance or annuity coverage, the right to cancel period is extended to 60 days from the date of receiving it. If you are not satisfied with the Contract, return it to the Retirement Resource Operations Center or an agent of the Company. The Contract will be void from the start, and the Company will refund the Annuity Account Value plus any charges and fees as of the Transaction Date the Request for cancellation is received. During the right to cancel period, the Contributions will be allocated in the Sub-Account(s) as specified in the application.


2.        Section 3.03 of Section 3 of the Contract is deleted and replaced with the following:


3.03 ALLOCATION OF CONTRIBUTIONS
If the application is in good order, the initial Contribution will be applied within two Business Days of receipt at the Retirement Resource Operations Center. During the right-to-cancel period, all Contributions will be allocated in one or more of the Sub-Account(s) as specified in the application. During the right-to-cancel period, the Owner may change the allocations to the Sub-Accounts.


Subsequent Contributions will be allocated to the Annuity Account in the proportion Requested by the Owner. If there are no accompanying instructions, then allocations will be made in accordance with standing instructions. Allocations will be effective upon the Transaction Date.


Signed for Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company of New York on the issuance of the Contract. 




[                           ]    [                                   ]
[Richard Schultz],    [Louis J. Manello, Jr.],
[Secretary]    [President and Chief Executive Officer]

SCH-AMENDNY
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 10 

Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of a Secretary of 

the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of 

a Secretary of the Senate. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives be noti2 fied of the election of the Honorable Nancy Erickson as 

3 Secretary of the Senate. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
| (1)   | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Trans Max Technologies, Inc. for                the                quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                quarter ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Trans                Max                Technologies, Inc. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/                Samuel                Higgins                                      |   |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|  Name:     |  Samuel                Higgins                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|  Title:    |  Principal                Executive Officer,Principal                Financial Officer and Director                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|  Date:     |  November                22, 2005                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
(75 South. 278)

(1 Div. 243.)

#### PRESSNALL v. STATE.

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 17, 1917.)

Criminal Law <&wkey;1169(2) — Harmless Error —Rulings on Evidence.

Error in admitting evidence on prosecution for violating prohibition law that defendant was half drunk when witness met him was rendered harmless by defendant testifying he was full drunk.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. § 3138.]

Appeal from Clarke County Court; A. S. Johnson, Judge.

Josh Pressnall was convicted, and appeals.

Affirmed.

W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and Harwell G. Davis, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMFORD, J.

The defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and from a judgment of conviction he appeals.

There are but two questions of law presented by the record for review:

1. The court, over the objection of the defendant, allowed the witness Waite, who testified for the state, to state that when he first met the defendant on the evening the whisky was obtained, the defendant was half drunk. This was error; but was rendered, error without injury by the defendant himself, who, in his direct testimony, said he was full drunk. Kelsoe v. State, 15 Ala. App. 461, 73 South. 831.

2. The defendant, when the state Closed its ease, moved to exclude all the testimony, which motion the court overruled. This was not error. There was enough evidence to go ta the jury upon which to base a verdict..

There is no error in the record, and the case is affirmed.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATE OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC. (REGISTRANT)
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James A. Wylie, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify to
the best of my knowledge and belief pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005,
which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Registrant.



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter
63 title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.


Date:  November 14, 2005                        /s/ JAMES A. WYLIE, JR.
                                                ---------------------------
                                                James A. Wylie, Jr.
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)
[No. 47405-7-I.

Division One.

December 9, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Seth Kypreos, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 98-1-01003-1, Ronald L. Castleberry, J., entered August 23, 2000. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Baker, J., concurred in by Grosse, J., and Webster, J. Pro Tern. Now published at 115 Wn. App. 207.
**Exhibit 32.1**

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of

HORIZON BANCORPORATION, INC.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc., hereby certifies that:

| 1.     | Horizon Bancorporation, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on   Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, to which this certification   is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the   requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of   1934; and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc.                                                                                                                                    |

|                                  |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Charles S. Conoley                    |   |
|                                       |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                  |   |
| May 10, 2006                          |   |

----
#### § 452.118 Local unions agents in international elections.

An international union may establish internal rules which require local or intermediate union officials to act as agents of the international in conducting designated aspects of the international referendum election of officers. The consequences of the failure to perform as directed by such officials will, of course, depend on the totality of the circumstances involved.
#### § 4204.2 Definitions.

The following terms are defined in § 4001.2 of this chapter: Code, employer, ERISA, IRS, multiemployer plan, PBGC, person, plan, plan administrator, plan sponsor, and plan year.

In addition, for purposes of this part:

*Date of determination* means the date on which a seller ceases covered operations or ceases to have an obligation to contribute for such operations as a result of a sale of assets within the meaning of section 4204(a) of ERISA.

*Net income after taxes* means revenue minus expenses after taxes (excluding extraordinary and non-recurring income or expenses), as presented in an audited financial statement or, in the absence of such statement, in an unaudited financial statement, each prepared in conformance with generally accepted accounting principles.

*Net tangible assets* means tangible assets (assets other than licenses, patents copyrights, trade names, trademarks, goodwill, experimental or organizational expenses, unamortized debt discounts and expenses and all other assets which, under generally accepted accounting principles, are deemed intangible) less liabilities (other than pension liabilities). Encumbered assets shall be excluded from net tangible assets only to the extent of the amount of the encumbrance.

*Purchaser* means a purchaser described in section 4204(a)(1) of ERISA.

*Seller* means a seller described in section 4204(a)(1) of ERISA.

*Unfunded vested benefits* means, as described in section 4213(c) of ERISA, the amount by which the value of nonforfeitable benefits under the plan exceeds the value of the assets of the plan.

[61 FR 34084, July 1, 1996, as amended at 86 FR 1270, Jan. 8, 2021]