alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 20 

Expressing the sense of Congress that no funds should be cut off or reduced 

for American troops in the field which would result in undermining 

their safety or their ability to complete their assigned missions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2007 

Mr. GREGG (for himself, Mr. LOTT, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. CORNYN, 

Mr. STEVENS, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. COBURN, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. COLEMAN, Mr. 

DEMINT, Mr. THUNE, and Mr. SESSIONS) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that no funds should be 

cut off or reduced for American troops in the field which 

would result in undermining their safety or their ability 

to complete their assigned missions. 

Whereas under article II, section 2, of the Constitution of the 

United States, the President is the ‘‘commander in chief 

of the Army and Navy of the United States’’, and in such 

capacity the President has the command of the Armed 

Forces, including the authority to deploy troops and direct military campaigns during wartime; 

Whereas under article I, section 8, of the Constitution of the 

United States, Congress has the power of the purse speVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:47 Mar 16, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SC20.ATS SC20

jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•SCON 20 ATS 

cifically as it relates to the Armed Forces, and in such 

capacity Congress has the responsibility to fully and adequately provide funding for United States military forces, 

especially when they are at war and are defending the 

Nation; and 

Whereas when United States military forces are in harm’s 

way and are protecting our country, Congress and the 

Nation should give them all the support they need in 

order to maintain their safety and accomplish their assigned missions, including the equipment, logistics, and 

funding necessary to ensure their safety and effectiveness, and such support is the responsibility of both the 

Executive Branch and the Legislative Branch of Government: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that Con3 gress should not take any action that will endanger United 

4 States military forces in the field, including the elimi5 nation or reduction of funds for troops in the field, as such 

6 action with respect to funding would undermine their safe7 ty or harm their effectiveness in pursuing their assigned 

8 missions. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>





<ARTICLE>5
       
<S>                                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                 Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                      Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                                                                 19,935
<SECURITIES>                                                           16,231
<RECEIVABLES>                                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       36,732
<PP&E>                                                                 30,995
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         26,930
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                         45,370
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   9,568
<BONDS>                                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                                   21
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                                              9,718
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                           45,370
<SALES>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                          757
<CGS>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       13,993
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        454
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      (13,109)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  (13,109)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         (13,109)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                            0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                            0.33

        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.3

April 14, 2015

 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Commissioners: 

 

We have read Gyrotron Technology, Inc.’s statements included under Item 4.02 of its Form 8-K filed on April 14, 2015 and we agree with such statements concerning our firm.

 

/s/ Freed Maxick CPAs, P.C.
#### BUEHNER v STATE

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

Decided September 16, 1929

L. E. Appleton, Cleveland, for Buehner.

Ray T. Miller, Cleveland, for State.

SULLIVAN, J.

There is only one ground of error and that is the claim that the court erred in refusing to grant, at the request of counsel for plaintiff in error, leave for him to leave the court room during the trial temporarily while the testimony relating to his identification and description was in process of being detailed. The motive and object appears to be that the absence of the defendant at the time would have been a test of the ability of the witness to describe and identify the defendant. A cross-examination, had the request been allowed, would have followed along this line and plaintiff in error, through counsel, claims that he was injured in his rights by not being allowed this basis and foundation for a cross-examination upon this question of identity. The court refused the request and error is based unon this refusal. This was a matter which ivas purely within the discretion of the court and we find nothing in the record which shows an abuse of discretion and that being so the judgment will stand and it is hereby affirmed. •

Vickery, PJ, and Levine, J, concur.
§ 1604.8 Relationship of title VII to the Equal Pay Act. ( a ) The employee coverage of the prohibitions against discrimination based on sex contained in title VII is coextensive with that of the other prohibitions contained in title VII and is not limited by section 703(h) to those employees covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act.
( b ) By virtue of section 703(h), a defense based on the Equal Pay Act may be raised in a proceeding under title VII.
( c ) Where such a defense is raised the Commission will give appropriate consideration to the interpretations of the Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, Department of Labor, but will not be bound thereby.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 23



                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of The Liberty Corporation of our report dated February 1, 2000, included in the
1999 Annual Report to Shareholders of The Liberty Corporation.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedules of The Liberty
Corporation listed in Item 14(a). These schedules are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedules referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-22591) pertaining to The Cosmos Broadcasting Corporation
Retirement and Savings Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-22285) pertaining to The Liberty Corporation Retirement and Savings Plan,
and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-30151) pertaining to The
Performance Incentive Compensation Program of our report dated February 1, 2000
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of The
Liberty Corporation incorporated by reference in the annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Greenville, South Carolina
March 17, 2000



                                       74
(78 South. 991)

#### STOLLENWERCK v. STATE.

(2 Div. 176.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 2, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hale County; B. M. Miller, Judge.

Evins & Jack, of Greensboro, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and rendered, in obedience to the mandate of the Supreme Court. 201 Ala. 392, 78 South. 454.
**EPA ICR No. 2195.04 OMB Control No. 2070**  **- 0169**  **Attachment G Display**  **Related to OMB Control #2070 -**  **0169 Listings of Related Regulations in 40 CFR 9.1**  As of May 10, 1993, the OMB approval numbers for EPA regulations in Chapter I of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) appear in a listing in 40 CFR 9.1 (58 FR 27472). This listing fulfills the display requirements in section 3507(f) of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) for EPA regulations. The listing at 40 CFR 9.1 displays this OMB Control number for the following regulations: Program Title **Protections for Test Subjects in Human Research** 40 CFR Citation OMB Control No. 26.11 2 5........................................................................

........... 2070 - 0169 26.1303...................................................................................2070 - 0169
#### § 453.17 Term of the bond.

The amount of any required bond must in each instance be based on funds handled “during the preceding fiscal year,” and must be fixed “at the beginning” of an organization's fiscal year—that is, as soon after the date when such year begins as the necessary information from the preceding fiscal year can practicably be ascertained. This does not mean, however, that a new bond must be obtained each year. There is nothing in the Act which prohibits a bond for a term longer than one year, with whatever advantages such a bond might offer by way of a lower premium, but at the beginning of each fiscal year during its term the bond must be in at least the requisite amount. If it is below that level at that time for any reason, it would then be necessary either to modify the existing bond to increase it to the proper amount or to obtain a supplementary bond. In either event, the terms upon which this could best be done would be left to the parties directly concerned.
**Exhibit 32**

** **

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Terry G.Roussel and Gary W. Nielson, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of CornerstoneRealty Fund, LLC on Form 10-Q for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairlypresents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC.

 
|                             | /s/  TERRY G. ROUSSEL                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  August 11, 2004 | Terry G. Roussel                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|                             | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive  Officer) of  Cornerstone Ventures, Inc., Managing Member of  Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC, the Managing Member of Cornerstone  Realty Fund, LLC |

 

 
|                             | /s/ GARY W. NIELSON                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  August 11, 2004 | Gary W. Nielson                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|                             | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial  Officer) of  Cornerstone Ventures, Inc., Managing Member of  Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC, the Managing Member of  Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10907 Conference Calendar

CHARLES RAY GOSS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MONTFORD UNIT; NFN JETER, Lieutenant, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:01-CV-149-C

-------------------- December 12, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Charles Ray Goss (Texas prisoner #923183) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. He argues that his complaint should not have been dismissed because the racial slur and the other statements made to him by Lieutenant Jeter violated his Fourteenth Amendment equal-protection right to be free from racial discrimination. Goss’ argument, however, is unavailing. See Williams v. Bramer , 180 F.3d 699, 706 (5th Cir. 1999)(stating that “[w]here theNo. 01-10907 -2- conduct at issue consists solely of speech, there is no equal protection violation”); Bender v. Brumley , 1 F.3d 271, 274 n.4 (5th Cir. 1993)(stating that allegations of verbal abuse as well as threatening language and gestures on the part of a correctional officer do not rise to the level of a constitutional violation). Accordingly, the district court did not err in dismissing Goss’ complaint. See Bass v. Parkwood Hosp. , 180 F.3d 234, 240 (5th Cir. 1999). Goss’ appeal is frivolous and is therefore DISMISSED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. The dismissal of Goss’ complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim and the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous each count as a strike for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). We caution Goss that once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) WARNING ISSUED.
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-11-0000814 

31-JUL-2013 

02:08 PM 

SCWC-11-0000814
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
 

vs.
 

CHONG HUNG HAN, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(CAAP-11-0000814; FC-CR. NO. 10-1-1098)
 

ORDER OF CORRECTION
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)
 

Upon review of the Opinion of the court filed on June
 

19, 2013, it appears that sections VIII and IX are repetitive. 


Therefore,
 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that part of section IX (lines 5­

12 on page 23 and lines 1-6 on page 24) is deleted. The
 

subsequent section roman numerals are changed to reflect the
 

deletion. Additionally, in footnote 8, lines 1-3 are deleted.
 
 

The Clerk of the Court is directed to take all
 

necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of these
 

changes.
 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, July 31, 2013.

 /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

 /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

 /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

 /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

 /s/ Richard W. Pollack 

2
#### § 452.111 Campaigning in polling places.

There must not be any campaigning within a polling place[54] and a union may forbid any campaigning within a specified distance of a polling place.

###### Footnotes -
  452.111

[54] See *Hodgson* v. *UMW,* 344 F.Supp. 17 (D.D.C. 1972).
#### § 4043.67 Loan default.

Advance notice is required for an acceleration of payment, a default, a waiver, or an agreement to an amendment with respect to a loan agreement described in § 4043.34(a).
# tiOT-osr-wn-z'^t e 

# J ^ ^ JAMESTOW N REGIONA L AIRPOR T

-ADMIRA L DO N WEIS S FIELD

P O BO X 1560 » Jamestown , North Dakot a58402-1560 Phone : 701-252-646 6 Fax : 701-252-291 9 Website : www.flyjamestown.ne t

7/25/201 1 Denni s J . DeVany ^ ^ Essentia ] Ai r

Servic e Division , X-5 3 Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s USDO T 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenu e S E Washington . D.C . 2059 0 Dea r Mr . DeVany ; O n Jul y 15,201 1 th e Jamestow n Regiona l Airpor t Authorit y receive daninet y da y notic e for terminatio n o f

servic e fiomMesab aAviation , Inc . an dPinnacl e Airline s Inc . d/b/aDelt a Connection , Therefore , th e Jamestow n Regiona l Airpor t Authorit y woul dlike t o reques t

th e DO T exten dth e deadlin e 3 0 day s for ou r HAS RFP . Docke t

DOT-OST-1997-2785 , originall y du e Augus t 1,2011 . Respectfully ,

.TamA Q Rnv H ' Matthe w J . Leitne r

Jame s Boy d Manager , Jamestow n Regional Airport Chainnan , JRA A

Cc : Mr . Johnatha o Nord , Manager , Devil s Lak e Regiona l Airpor t
#### STARK COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY v. BRENNER

Ohio Supreme Court

No 22207.

Decided June 18, 1930

*386Kinkade, Robinson, Day and Allen, JJ., concur. Matthias, J., concurs in the judgment of reversal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     The Financial Data Schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 10Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001074436
<NAME>                          Saratoga Holdings I, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          125
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                125
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  11,240
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           11,000
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        4,000
<OTHER-SE>                      3,760
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    11,245
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   10,760
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 10,760
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    10,760
<EPS-BASIC>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.1 


FORM OF
 CERTIFICATE OF CONVERSION
 CONVERTING
 MACQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANY LLC,
 (A Delaware Limited Liability Company)
 TO
 MACQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION
(A Delaware Corporation) 


Pursuant to Section 265 of the Delaware General Corporation Law,
 8 Del. C. §§101 et seq. (the “DGCL”) 


This Certificate of Conversion is being filed for the purpose of converting Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Converting Entity”), to a Delaware corporation to be named “Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation” (the “Corporation”). 


The undersigned, being an authorized person of the Converting Entity, does hereby certify as follows: 


		1.	Date and Jurisdiction of Formation of Converting Entity.  The date the Converting Entity was first formed is April 13, 2004, and the jurisdiction where the Converting Entity was first formed, which jurisdiction has not changed, is Delaware. 



		2.	Name and Type of Converting Entity.  The name of the Converting Entity immediately prior to filing this Certificate of Conversion is “Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC”. The Converting Entity was a Delaware limited liability company immediately prior to filing this Certificate of Conversion. 



		3.	Name of Continuing Corporation.  The name of the Delaware corporation to which the Converting Entity is being converted and the name set forth in the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation filed in accordance with Section 265 of the DGCL is “Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation”. 



		4.	Effective Time.  This Certificate of Conversion shall become effective on     , 2015, at         . 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being an authorized person of the Converting Entity, has duly executed this Certificate of Conversion as of the      day of         , 2015. 


 

Name:
 Authorized Person