alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 24



POWER OF ATTORNEY



We, the undersigned directors of Lee Enterprises, Incorporated, hereby severally constitute Mary E. Junck and Carl G. Schmidt, and each of them, our true and lawful attorneys with full power to them, and each of them, to sign
for us and in our names, in the capacities indicated below, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lee Enterprises, Incorporated for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2008 to be filed herewith and any amendments to said Annual Report, and
generally do all such things in our name and behalf in our capacities as directors to enable Lee Enterprises, Incorporated to comply with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, and all requirements of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said attorneys, or either of them, to said Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments thereto.



|                                 |  |                  
|-------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|Signature                        |  | Date             
|                                 | 
|/s/ Richard R. Cole              |  |                  
|Richard R. Cole, Director        |  | December 12, 2008
|                                 | 
|/s/ Nancy S. Donovan             |  |                  
|Nancy S. Donovan, Director       |  | December 12, 2008
|                                 | 
|/s/ Leonard J. Elmore            |  |                  
|Leonard J. Elmore, Director      |  | December 12, 2008
|                                 | 
|/s/ William E. Mayer             |  |                  
|William E. Mayer, Director       |  | December 12, 2008
|                                 | 
|/s/ Herbert W. Moloney III       |  |                  
|Herbert W. Moloney III, Director |  | December 12, 2008
|                                 | 
|/s/ Andrew E. Newman             |  |                  
|Andrew E. Newman, Director       |  | December 12, 2008
|                                 | 
|/s/ Gordon D. Prichett           |  |                  
|Gordon D. Prichett, Director     |  | December 12, 2008
|                                 | 
|/s/ Gregory P. Schermer          |  |                  
|Gregory P. Schermer, Director    |  | December 12, 2008
|                                 | 
|/s/ Mark Vittert                 |  |                  
|Mark Vittert, Director           |  | December 12, 2008
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 986 

To expand eligibility for Combat-Related Special Compensation paid by the 

uniformed services in order to permit certain additional retired members 

who have a service-connected disability to receive both disability compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs for that disability 

and Combat-Related Special Compensation by reason of that disability. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 26, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. SANDERS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To expand eligibility for Combat-Related Special Compensation paid by the uniformed services in order to permit 

certain additional retired members who have a serviceconnected disability to receive both disability compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs for that 

disability and Combat-Related Special Compensation by 

reason of that disability. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Combat-Related Spe5 cial Compensation Act of 2007’’. 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 986 IS 

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF COMBAT-RELATED SPECIAL COM2 PENSATION ELIGIBILITY FOR CHAPTER 61 

3 MILITARY RETIREES. 

4 (a) ELIGIBILITY.—Subsection (c) of section 1413a of 

5 title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘enti6 tled to retired pay who—’’ and all that follows and insert7 ing ‘‘who— 

8 ‘‘(1) is entitled to retired pay (other than by 

9 reason of section 12731b of this title); and 

10 ‘‘(2) has a combat-related disability.’’. 

11 (b) COMPUTATION.—Paragraph (3) of subsection (b) 

12 of such section is amended— 

13 (1) by designating the text of that paragraph as 

14 subparagraph (A), realigning that text so as to be 

15 indented 4 ems from the left margin, and inserting 

16 before ‘‘In the case of’’ the following heading: ‘‘IN

17 GENERAL.—’’; and 

18 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub19 paragraph: 

20 ‘‘(B) SPECIAL RULE FOR RETIREES WITH

21 FEWER THAN 20 YEARS OF SERVICE.—In the 

22 case of an eligible combat-related disabled uni23 formed services retiree who is retired under 

24 chapter 61 of this title with fewer than 20 

25 years of creditable service, the amount of the 

26 payment under paragraph (1) for any month 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
3 

•S 986 IS 

1 shall be reduced by the amount (if any) by 

2 which the amount of the member’s retired pay 

3 under chapter 61 of this title exceeds the 

amount equal to 21 4 ⁄2 percent of the member’s 

5 years of creditable service multiplied by the 

6 member’s retired pay base under section 

7 1406(b)(1) or 1407 of this title, whichever is 

8 applicable to the member.’’. 

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this section shall take effect on January 1, 2008, and shall 

11 apply to payments for months beginning on or after that 

12 date. 

Æ 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
`[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 42 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]






                                                       Calendar No. 942
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 42

    Relating to the approval of the proposed agreement for nuclear 
   cooperation between the United States and the Russian Federation.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 24 (legislative day, June 23), 2008

   Mr. Biden (for himself and Mr. Lugar) (by request) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
 Committee on Foreign Relations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2159, for not to 
                        exceed 45 calendar days

              August 22 (legislative day, August 1), 2008

  Committee discharged pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2159, and placed on the 
                                calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
    Relating to the approval of the proposed agreement for nuclear 
   cooperation between the United States and the Russian Federation.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress does favor 
the proposed agreement for cooperation transmitted to the Congress by 
the President on May 13, 2008.




                                                       Calendar No. 942

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 42

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

    Relating to the approval of the proposed agreement for nuclear 
   cooperation between the United States and the Russian Federation.

_______________________________________________________________________

              August 22 (legislative day, August 1), 2008

  Committee discharged pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2159, and placed on the 
                                calendar`
#### Jeffrey S. Ween & Associates, Appellant, v Lora Labovsky et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[698 NYS2d 634]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered June 5, 1998, which, *inter alia,*dismissed plaintiff’s complaint and replies to defendants’ counterclaims, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

After having been ordered to appear personally at an adjourned conference because counsel was unable to answer questions related to discovery issues, plaintiff’s principal, Jeffrey Ween, did not attend the conference but instead sent counsel, who submitted a letter of engagement by Ween. Upon questioning by the court, it was disclosed that, contrary to the allegations in his letter, Ween was available since his trial had been resolved, but that Ween nonetheless chose to remain in his office, purportedly because he was not prepared to respond to certain interrogatories. After the court dismissed the complaint, it granted counsel’s request for a brief recess in order to secure Ween’s presence. Ween still refused to come to court, claiming that he was not prepared to defend on the counterclaims. Under the circumstances, plaintiff’s principal’s conduct was willful, contumacious and in bad faith and warranted the drastic remedy of striking plaintiff’s pleadings *(cf., Board of Mgrs. of Landmark Condominium v 117 Tulip Ave. Assocs.,*247 AD2d 569).

*58We have considered plaintiffs remaining contention and find it to be unavailing. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.
----

----

I Informacija

Komisija

----

SKUPNI KATALOG SORT POLJŠČIN

13. dodatek k 22. dopolnjeni izdaji

(2004/C 232 A/01)

LEGENDA

IV

80.ZEA MAYS L.

----

(1)UL C 91 A, 16.4.2003. Katalog nazadnje spremenjen z 12. dodatkom (UL C 123A, 25.8.2004).

----
----

Removal from the Register of Case T-308/99 (1)

(2004/C 228/101)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

By order of 24 May 2004, the President of the Second Chamber (Extended Composition) of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-308/99, H. Peeters Service B.V., supported by the Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities.

----

(1)OJ C 63, 4.3.2000.

----
#### Frances McMahon et al., Respondents, *v.*Staten Island Coach Company, Inc., Appellant.

Argued May 27, 1937;

decided June 11, 1937.

*Bertram G. Eadie*for appellant.

*Lloyd R. Christopher*and *Joseph P. Walsh*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-3286

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Carl Merlo

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville

____________

 Submitted: April 19, 2018

Filed: April 24, 2018

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Carl Merlo directly appeals after he pleaded guilty to a child-pornography

charge and the district court varied downward from the calculated Guidelines range 1

The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the

1

Western District of Arkansas.
to impose an 87-month prison term. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed

a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that Merlo’s

sentence is substantively unreasonable, as the court should have varied downward

further in light of various mitigating factors. 

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose an

unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8thCir.

2009) (en banc) (reviewing a sentence under the deferential abuse-of-discretion

standard and discussing substantive reasonableness); see also United States v.

McCauley, 715 F.3d 1119, 1127 (8th Cir. 2013) (noting that when the district court

has varied below the Guidelines range, it is “nearly inconceivable” that the court

abused its discretion in not varying downward further).

Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant

counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________

-2-
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 10 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 10

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
              relative to equal rights for men and women.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 27, 2007

   Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Mr. Kerry, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Harkin, Mr. 
Lautenberg, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Lieberman, Mrs. Feinstein, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. 
Brown, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Schumer, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Biden, Mr. Levin, Mr. 
 Menendez, Mrs. Murray, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Feingold, Ms. Stabenow, and 
 Mr. Whitehouse) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
              relative to equal rights for men and women.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied 
or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by 
appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
    ``Section 3. This article shall take effect 2 years after the date 
of ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of The Boyds Collection, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jan L. Murley, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)             The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2)             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

*A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to The Boyds Collection, Ltd. and will be retained by The BoydsCollection, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.*

 

 
| /s/ Jan L.  Murley      |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Jan L. Murley           |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| November 14, 2003       |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 10 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 10

 Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of a Secretary 
                             of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of a Secretary 
                             of the Senate.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives be notified of the 
election of the Honorable Nancy Erickson as Secretary of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 4065.2 Definitions.

The following terms are defined in § 4001.2 of this chapter: ERISA, IRS, PBGC, and plan.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4682

_____________________________

JOSE ANGEL LOPEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

May 17, 2018

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

LEWIS, ROBERTS, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

David M. Robbins and Susan Z. Cohen of Epstein & Robbins, 

Jacksonville, for Petitioner.
2

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Amanda D. Stokes, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
§ 37.66 What happens if a recipient fails to submit requested data, records, and/or information, or fails to provide CRC with the required access? The Director may issue a Notice to Show Cause to a recipient failing to comply with the requirements of this part, where such failure results in the inability of the Director to make a finding. Such a failure includes, but is not limited to, the recipient's failure or refusal to: ( a ) Submit requested information, records, and/or data within 30 days of receiving a Notification Letter;
( b ) Submit, in a timely manner, information, records, and/or data requested during a compliance review, complaint investigation, or other action to determine a recipient's compliance with the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIA or this part; or
( c ) Provide CRC access in a timely manner to a recipient's premises, records, or employees during a compliance review, as required in § 37.40.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12187]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title, Form Number, and OMB Number: Pharmacy Redesign Pilot 
Program; DD Form 2814; OMB Number 0720-0023.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 2,000.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 2,000.
    Average Burden Per Response: 10 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 333.
    Needs and Uses: The collection instrument serves as an application 
form for enrollment in the TRICARE Pharmacy Redesign Pilot Program. The 
information collected will be used to provide the Managed Care Support 
Contractors, contracted to supply administrative support, with data to 
determine beneficiary eligibility, other health insurance liability, 
and premium payment. An eligible beneficiary for the pharmacy redesign 
demonstration is a member or former member of the uniformed services as 
described in section 1074(b) of title 10; a dependent of the member 
described in section 1076(a)(2)(B) or 1076(b) of title 10; or a 
dependent of a member of the uniformed services who died while on 
active duty for a period of more than 30 days, who meets the following 
requirements: (a) 65 years of age or older; (b) entitled to Medicare 
Part A, (c) enrolled in Medicare Part B, and (d) resides in an 
implementation area. The Department of Defense component responsible 
for the conduct of the project is the TRICARE Management Activity.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion; annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to Obtain or Retain Benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

Patricia L. Toppings;
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-12187 Filed 5-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M