alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 102 (Thursday, May 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13129]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than June 8, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (JoAnne F. Lewellen, 
Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. David C. Reiling, Minneapolis, Minnesota; to acquire voting 
shares of University Financial Corporation, Saint Paul, Minnesota, and 
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of University National Bank, 
Saint Paul, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 19, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-13129 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.1081 Pre-dive procedures.

Note:

The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.421 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-1910.421).

[[61 FR 31432](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31432), June 20, 1996]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 102 (Thursday, May 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33885-33886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13119]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB review; Comment Request

May 16, 2000.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before June 26, 2000 
to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-0120.
    Form Number: IRS Form 1099-G.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Certain Government and Qualified State Tuition Program 
Payments.
    Description: Form 1099-G is used by governments (primarily state 
and local) to report to the IRS (and notify recipients of) certain 
payments (e.g., unemployment compensation and income tax refunds). IRS 
uses the information to insure that the income is being properly 
reported by the recipients on their returns.
    Respondents: Federal Government, State, Local or Tribal Government
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,900.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 12 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Annually.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 11,149,325 hours.

    OMB Number: 1545-0190.
    Form Number: IRS Form 4876-A.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Election To Be Treated as an Interest Charge DISC.
    Description: A domestic corporations and its shareholders must 
elect to be an interest charge domestic international sales corporation 
(IC-DISC). Form 4876-A I used to make the election. IRS uses the 
information to determine if the corporation qualifies to be an IC-DISC.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 1,000.

[[Page 33886]]

    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper:

    Recordkeeping--4 hr., 4 min.
    Learning about the law or the form--1 hr., 47 min.
    Preparing and sending the form to the IRS--1 hr., 54 min.

    Frequency of Response: Other (One-Time Election).
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 5,760 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, Internal Revenue Service, Room 
5244, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-13119 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

RICHARD A. MCGEE,

Petitioner, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, 

Respondent. 

____________________ 

2009-3263 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board in 

No. CH0752080403-I-1. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

LAWRENCE J. FLEMING, Herzog Crebs, of St. Louis, 

Missouri, argued for petitioner. 

RENEE GERBER, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation 

Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of 

Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With 

her on the brief were TONY WEST, Assistant Attorney 

General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, and DONALD E.

KINNER, Assistant Director. 

______________________ 
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PROST and MOORE, 

Circuit Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 October 12, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

	I, John B. Dicus, certify that:

	1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Capitol Federal Financial;

	2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

	3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

	4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

		a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

		b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

		c)	disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

	5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial report, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

		a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

		b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Date: February 4, 2004

By: /s/ John B. Dicus                                    

John B. Dicus, President and 

						Chief Executive Officer

----
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration



# MAY ott01! Federal Aviation Administration Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center

US Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Dear Sirs: 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169-6901

Flight Inspection Services (FIS) Operating Certificate# RU3A249N, has been changed from "Aviation System Standards, Operating Certificate# RU3A796U". FIS requests an amendment ofexemptionNo. 5118K, to reflect this new name.
ExemptionNo. 5118K, from 14 CFR Part 91.119(b) and (c), 91.159, 91.175(a) and (b), 91.179, and 91.515 (a)(l) and (2) ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations allows FIS to deviate from certain flight rules required by subpart B ofpart 91 while conducting flight inspections ofair navigation facilities and instrument approach procedures. The exemption also permits FIS to deviate from the 91.177 minimum altitudes for instrument flight rule operations whenperforming flight inspections ofair navigation facilities and instrument approach procedures at night. ExemptionNo. 5118Khad an expiration date ofMarch 31, 2014.

There have beenno changes inthe conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. We feel continued operation under the provisions ofthe exemptionwould be inthe public interest.
Sincerely,

# ~~~

etYrw. fdfetsch Director ofOperations Flight Inspection Services
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 994 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 994

To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate the deductible and 
 change the method of determining the mileage reimbursement rate under 
    the beneficiary travel program administered by the Secretary of 
               Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 27, 2007

Mr. Tester (for himself and Mr. Salazar) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate the deductible and 
 change the method of determining the mileage reimbursement rate under 
    the beneficiary travel program administered by the Secretary of 
               Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disabled Veterans Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. VETERANS BENEFICIARY TRAVEL PROGRAM.

    (a) Elimination of Deductible.--
            (1) Elimination.--Section 111 of title 38, United States 
        Code, is amended by striking subsection (c).
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Subsection (b) of such section 
        is amended by striking ``Except as provided in subsection (c) 
        of this section and notwithstanding'' and inserting 
        ``Notwithstanding''.
    (b) Determination of Mileage Reimbursement Rate.--
            (1) Determination.--Paragraph (1) of subsection (g) of such 
        section is amended to read as follows:
    ``(1) In determining the amount of allowances or reimbursement to 
be paid under this section, the Secretary shall use the mileage 
reimbursement rates for the use of privately owned vehicles by 
Government employees on official business, as prescribed by the 
Administrator of General Services under section 5707(b) of title 5.''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Subsection (g) of such section 
        is further amended by striking paragraphs (3) and (4).
    (c) Source of Funds.--Such section is further amended by adding at 
the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Amounts for payments under this section shall be derived from 
amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department 
specifically for such payments.''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply 
with respect to travel expenses incurred after the expiration of the 
90-day period that begins on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
JUDGMENTS.

[Jefferson Circuit Court,

December 7, 1896.]

#### Raugh Bros. & Co. v. Acknovitch.

Transcripts prom Justice Court Equal in Priority to Common Pleas Judgments.

A transcript of a judgment of a justice of the peace, which is filed in the court of common pleas, has the same effect as a judgment rendered in that court at the same term, and executions issued on such judgments are equal in priority.

Heard on Error.

*Cook,*for plaintiffs.

*P. P.*Lewis, for I. Levi & Co.

Laubie, J.

(Memorandum.)

A transcript from a justice’s court filed in the common pleas court, during the term, has the same effect as a judgment rendered in that court during the same term, and executions issued upon such judgments are equal in priority.

The plaintiffs and A. B. Acknovitch and Moses Esakovitch, creditors of Jos. Acknovitch, took *cognovit*judgments to about $3,000 in the court of common pleas at its January term, 1895. I. Levi & Co:, Philadelphia creditors, took judgment before a justice of the peace for $200, filed transcript with clerk of court, and issued execution therefrom to the sheriff, who levied on the same stock of goods as on the execution on the judgment in the common pleas rendered at the same term of court. And Levi & Co. claimed, by reason thereof, that they were entitled to their *pro rata*share of the proceeds of sale of stock sold, the same not being sufficient to pay all the judgments in full. The contention was that the judgments did not stand on equal footing, being taken in diffent courts. See Secs. 5377, 5379, 5382, Rev. Stat.

Judgment affirmed.
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3569 — WENDEL INVESTISSEMENT/BUREAU VERITAS)

(2004/C 244/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
§ 2571.9 Decision of the administrative law judge. For section 521 proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.57 of this title: ( a ) *Proposed findings of fact, conclusions, and order.* Within twenty (20) days of the filing of the transcript of the testimony, or such additional time as the administrative law judge may allow, each party may file with the administrative law judge, subject to the judge's discretion, proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order together with a supporting brief expressing the reasons for such proposals. Such proposals and briefs shall be served on all parties, and shall refer to all portions of the record and to all authorities relied upon in support of each proposal.
( b ) *Decision of the administrative law judge.* The administrative law judge shall make his or her decision expeditiously after the conclusion of the section 521 proceeding. The decision of the administrative law judge shall include findings of fact and conclusions of law with reasons therefore upon each material issue of fact or law presented on the record. The decision of the administrative law judge shall be based upon the whole record and shall be supported by reliable and probative evidence. The decision of the administrative law judge shall become final agency action within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 704 unless an appeal is made pursuant to the procedures set forth in §§ 2571.10 through 2571.12.
[No. 27829-4-II.

Division Two.

January 3, 2003.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Philip R. Boling, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Jefferson County, No. 99-1-00067-1, Thomas J. Majhan, J., entered September 13, 2001. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, C.J., concurred in by Armstrong and Quinn-Brintnall, JJ.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 14, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 14, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18A0785. DNKN HOLDINGS, LLC v. DAVE MCKEMEY d/b/a MCKEMEY 

CONCRETE.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
#### § 4208.7 Adjustment of withdrawal liability for subsequent withdrawals.

The liability of an employer for a partial or complete withdrawal from a plan subsequent to a partial withdrawal from that plan in a prior plan year shall be reduced in accordance with part 4206 of this chapter.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 25, 2019

s0918

Order 

Clerk

September 25, 2019

158240

SUSAN BISIO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 158240

COA: 335422

Oakland CC: 2015-150462-CZ

THE CITY OF THE VILLAGE OF

CLARKSTON,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 3, 2018 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

address: (1) whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the documents sought by 

the plaintiff were not within the definition of “public record” in § 2(i) of the Freedom of 

Information Act (FOIA), MCL 15.231 et seq.; and (2) whether the defendant city’s 

charter-appointed attorney was an agent of the city such that his correspondence with 

third parties, which were never shared with the city or in the city’s possession, were 

public records subject to the FOIA, see Breighner v Michigan High Sch Athletic Ass’n, 

471 Mich 217, 233 ns 6 & 7 (2004); Hoffman v Bay City School Dist, 137 Mich App 333 

(1984). The time allowed for oral argument shall be 20 minutes for each side. MCR 

7.314(B)(1).

The Michigan Press Association, Detroit Free Press, Michigan Municipal League, 

and Michigan Townships Association are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other 

persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may 

move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12951]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 16, 2000.

    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Phillip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Capitol Bancorp, Ltd., Lansing, Michigan, and Sun Community 
Bancorp Limited, Phoenix, Arizona, to acquire 51 percent of the voting 
shares of Arrowhead Community Bank, Glendale, Arizona (in 
organization).

    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Downing Partnership, L.P., Ellis, Kansas; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 48.04 percent of the voting shares of 
Ellis State Bank, Ellis, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 18, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-12951 Filed 5-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Jonathan Beryl Harris; The Law Offices of J.B. Harris, P.A. and J.B. 

Harris, P.A. v. Phillip T. Howard, and Howard & Associates, 

Attorneys at Law, P.A.

Appellate case number: 01-19-00968-CV

Trial court case number: 2019-22971

Trial court: 127th District Court of Harris County

The en banc court has voted to deny appellants’ motion for en banc reconsideration. 

Accordingly, it is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is denied. 

En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelly, Goodman, 

Landau, Hightower, Countiss, and Adams.

Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Sarah B. Landau_____________ 

 Acting for the En Banc Court

Date: ____December 3, 2020______