alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered January 9, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00868-CR

No. 05-22-00869-CR

No. 05-22-00870-CR

No. 05-22-00871-CR

KENNETH SHERMAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F21-75358-M, F20-75893-M, F20-75847-M, F20-

54139-M

ORDER

The reporter’s record for these appeals is overdue. The record was 

originally due October 11, 2022. On November 14, 2022, the court reporter 

requested an extension of time to file the reporter’s record to December 12, 2022, 

which this Court granted. The reporter’s record remains unfiled. 
We ORDER court reporter Belinda Baraka to file the reporter’s record for 

these appeals on or before FEBRUARY 8, 2023. Ms. Baraka is cautioned that if 

the reporter’s record is not filed by February 8, 2023, the Court may abate the 

cases and order the trial court to make findings regarding why the reporter’s record 

has not been filed.

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA

JUSTICE
§ 452.36 Reasonableness of qualifications. ( a ) The question of whether a qualification is reasonable is a matter which is not susceptible of precise definition, and will ordinarily turn on the facts in each case. However, court decisions in deciding particular cases have furnished some general guidelines. The Supreme Court in *Wirtz* v. *Hotel, Motel and Club Employees Union, Local 6,* 391 U.S. 492 at 499 (1968) held that: Congress plainly did not intend that the authorization in section 401(e) of ‘reasonable qualifications uniformly imposed’ should be given a broad reach. The contrary is implicit in the legislative history of the section and in its wording that ‘every member in good standing shall be eligible to be a candidate and to hold office * * *.’ This conclusion is buttressed by other provisions of the Act which stress freedom of members to nominate candidates for Office. Unduly restrictive candidacy qualifications can result in the abuses of entrenched leadership that the LMRDA was expressly enacted to curb. The check of democratic elections as a preventive measure is seriously impaired by candidacy qualifications which substantially deplete the ranks of those who might run in opposition to incumbents.
Union qualifications for office should not be based on assumptions that certain experience or qualifications are necessary. Rather it must be assumed that the labor organization members will exercise common sense and judgment in casting their ballots. “Congress' model of democratic elections was political elections in this country” (*Wirtz* v. *Local 6,* 391 U.S. at 502) and a qualification may not be required without a showing that citizens assumed to make discriminating judgments in public elections cannot be relied on to make such judgments when voting as union members.
( b ) Some factors to be considered, therefore, in assessing the reasonableness of a qualification for union office are: ( 1 ) The relationship of the qualification to the legitimate needs and interests of the union;
( 2 ) The relationship of the qualification to the demands of union office;
( 3 ) The impact of the qualification, in the light of the Congressional purpose of fostering the broadest possible participation in union affairs;
( 4 ) A comparison of the particular qualification with the requirements for holding office generally prescribed by other labor organizations; and
( 5 ) The degree of difficulty in meeting a qualification by union members.
#### § 2571.5 Consequences of default.

For section 521 proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.5(b) of this title. Failure of the respondent to file an answer to the temporary order within the 30-day period provided by 29 CFR 2560.521-1(e) shall constitute a waiver of the respondent's right to appear and contest the temporary order. Such failure shall also be deemed to be an admission of the facts as alleged in the temporary order for purposes of any proceeding involving the order issued under section 521 of ERISA. The temporary order shall then become the final order of the Secretary, within the meaning of 29 CFR 2571.2(f), 30 days from the date of the service of the temporary order.
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Lancaster Colony Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John B.
Gerlach, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John L. Boylan, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

                                           By: /s/ JOHN B. GERLACH, JR.
                                               -------------------------------
                                                   John B. Gerlach, Jr.
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

                                           September 13, 2005


                                           By: /s/ JOHN L. BOYLAN
                                              --------------------------------
                                                   John L. Boylan
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

                                           September 13, 2005
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00256-CR

Ulysse Majoro

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 3

of Tarrant County (1381961D)

June 16, 2016

Opinion by Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Bonnie Sudderth________________

 Justice Bonnie Sudderth
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         5

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                     400,760
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                            1,543,053
<ALLOWANCES>                              (335,000)
<INVENTORY>                              1,852,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         3,488,463
<PP&E>                                   3,910,051
<DEPRECIATION>                           2,582,351
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           4,889,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    6,704,921
<BONDS>                                 12,565,822
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                924,525
<COMMON>                                   286,723
<OTHER-SE>                             (13,383,813)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             4,889,351
<SALES>                                 11,760,878
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        11,760,878
<CGS>                                    8,685,578
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           15,455,403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           214,398
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       1,741,433
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (5,435,958)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (19,497)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (5,416,461)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                            (5,416,461)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.20)
# AP P E N D IX G : W RA P E D MS F L OW CHARTData Submitted for each source type (module), for each State

and Tribe

QA/QC for Format

at data point of entry (see section 3.12)

Is Format Compliant?

QA/QC for Content (see section 3.12)

Is Content Complete?

Regional Database Finalized

Export and Query Standard Report in Tabular, Simple Plots, Point-and-click Maps, and GIS formats (see section 3.8)

CAC Special Report (see section 3.9.1 ) Pre-Trigger SO2 Annex Special Report (see section 3.9.2) Mobile Sources Special Reports (see section 3.9.3 ) Fire Sources Special Reports (see section 3.9.3 ) WRAP reviews and fills gaps based on default and sends back with analysis to STL agencies

for acceptance and comments Notify STL agency

of format non compliance and ask for correction and resubmission

Others: Phase II DBA Module (see Section 3.11)

GIS Module (see Section 3.10) WRAP EDMS Flow Chart
----

----

III Bekendmakingen

Europol

----

AANWERVING EUROPOL: DIRECTEUR

(2004/C 210 A/01)

Europol acht een evenwichtige vertegenwoordiging van mannen en vrouwen belangrijk, evenals een gelijkmatige spreiding over onderdanen van alle lidstaten, en houdt daarom rekening met een eerlijke geografische spreiding en met de verschillende officiële talen van de Europese Unie. Europol wil met name vrouwen uit alle lidstaten verzoeken op deze vacature te reageren.

1.   De missie van Europol

Europol is de rechthandhavingsorganisatie van de Europese Unie die criminele inlichtingen verwerkt. Europol heeft ten doel de effectiviteit te bevorderen van het optreden van, en de samenwerking tussen, de bevoegde instanties van de lidstaten met betrekking tot het voorkomen en bestrijden van ernstige vormen van internationale georganiseerde misdaad. Europol heeft als taak een wezenlijke bijdrage te leveren aan de rechthandhavingsacties van de Europese Unie tegen georganiseerde misdaad, en richt zich daarbij in het bijzonder op criminele organisaties.

2.   Taakomschrijving

2.1.   Hoofdtaken van de directeur van Europol

2.2.   Vereiste persoonlijke vaardigheden

Voor de functie van directeur van Europol is een strategische leider van het hoogste kaliber nodig, met aantoonbare ervaring in een hoge leidinggevende functie.

Van de kandidaten wordt verwacht dat zij:

3.   Arbeidsvoorwaarden

De kandidaten moeten onderdaan zijn van een van de lidstaten van de Europese Unie en hun rechten als staatsburger bezitten op de dag van hun sollicitatie. 

Het juridische kader van onderhavige selectieprocedure is vastgelegd in de Europol-overeenkomst en in het besluit van de Raad van 3 december 1998 houdende vaststelling van het Statuut voor de personeelsleden van Europol (1998/C 26/07), gewijzigd bij besluit van de Raad van 19 december 2002 (2003/C 24/01).

Nadere informatie is te vinden op de website van Europol (www.europol.eu.int).

3.1.   Aanstelling

De geselecteerde kandidaat wordt na advies van de raad van bestuur van Europol door de Raad aangesteld voor een periode van vier jaar. Deze periode kan eenmaal worden verlengd.

3.2.   Salariëring

Salarisschaal: 1.

Het basissalaris is 14  649,08 EUR.

Daarnaast kunnen, indien van toepassing, gezinstoelagen worden toegekend:

Op bovengenoemde bedragen dienen de sociale premies en belastingen te worden ingehouden.

4.   Veiligheidsonderzoek

De geslaagde sollicitant zal worden onderworpen aan een veiligheidsonderzoek conform de geheimhoudingsvoorschriften die strekken tot uitvoering van artikel 31 van de Europol-overeenkomst.

5.   Belangrijke data

Uiterste datum indiening sollicitatie: 60 dagen vanaf de datum van bekendmaking in het Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie.

Selectieprocedure: laatste kwartaal van 2004.

Aanvangsdatum: eerste kwartaal 2005.

6.   Sollicitaties

Kandidaten wordt verzocht hun sollicitatie schriftelijk in te dienen en daarbij gebruik te maken van het sollicitatieformulier dat op de website van Europol beschikbaar is. Het formulier moet worden gezonden naar:

Contactpersoon:

De heer L. van Kampen, assistent-directeur Algemene middelen

Tel. + 31 70 302 53 61

hru@europol.eu.int.

----
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Erik Herlyn, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial
  Officer of Manas Petroleum Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: April 15, 2009

|*/s/ Erik Herlyn*                                                                                                                                                
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Erik Herlyn                                                                                                                                                      
|Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer 
      (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer)

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 57 FR 31451, July 16, 1992.

#### § 20.109 Prior provision of rights with respect to debt.

To the extent that the rights of the debtor in relation to the same debt have been previously provided under some other statutory or regulatory authority, the Department is not required to duplicate those efforts before referring a debt for tax refund offset.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12198]



[[Page 31190]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NV-030-5700-10; Closure Notice No. NV-030-00-002]


Temporary Closure of Public Lands; Washoe County, Nevada

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Nevada, Interior.
SUMMARY: The Carson City Field Office Manager announces the temporary 
closure of selected public lands under his administration. This action 
is being taken to provide for public safety during the 2000 Pylon 
Racing Seminar and 2000 Reno National Championship Air RAces.

EFFECTIVE DATES: June 22 through June 25, 2000, and September 10 
through September 17, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Conrad, Assistant Manager, 
Nonrenewable Resources, Carson City Field Office, 5665 Morgan Mill 
Road, Carson City, Nevada 89701. Telephone (775) 885-6100.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This closure applies to all the public, on 
foot or in vehicles. The public lands affected by this closure are 
described as follows:

Mt. Diablo Meridian

T. 21 N., R. 19 E.,
    Sec. 8, N\1/2\\1/4\, SE\1/4\NE\1/4\ and E\1/2\SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 16, N\1/2\ and SW\1/4\.

    Aggregating approximately 680 acres.

    The above restrictions do not apply to emergency or law enforcement 
personnel or event officials. The authority for this closure is 43 CFR 
8364.1. Persons who violate this closure order are subject to arrest 
and, upon conviction, may be fined not more than $1,000 and/or 
imprisoned for not more than 12 months.
    A map of the closed area is posted in the Carson City District 
Office of the Bureau of Land Management.

    Dated: April 19, 2000.
Richard Conrad,
Assistant Manager, Nonrenewable Resources, Carson City Field Office.
[FR Doc. 00-12198 Filed 5-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-M
#### § 2530.205 [Reserved]
§ 1980.102 Obligations and prohibited acts. ( a ) No covered person may discharge, demote, suspend, threaten, harass or in any other manner retaliate against, including, but not limited to, intimidating, threatening, restraining, coercing, blacklisting or disciplining, any employee with respect to the employee's compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because the employee, or any person acting pursuant to the employee's request, has engaged in any of the activities specified in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section.
( b ) An employee is protected against retaliation (as described in paragraph (a) of this section) by a covered person for any lawful act done by the employee: ( 1 ) To provide information, cause information to be provided, or otherwise assist in an investigation regarding any conduct which the employee reasonably believes constitutes a violation of 18 U.S.C. 1341, 1343, 1344, or 1348, any rule or regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or any provision of Federal law relating to fraud against shareholders, when the information or assistance is provided to or the investigation is conducted by— ( i ) A Federal regulatory or law enforcement agency;
( ii ) Any Member of Congress or any committee of Congress; or
( iii ) A person with supervisory authority over the employee (or such other person working for the employer who has the authority to investigate, discover, or terminate misconduct); or
( 2 ) To file, cause to be filed, testify, participate in, or otherwise assist in a proceeding filed or about to be filed (with any knowledge of the employer) relating to an alleged violation of 18 U.S.C. 1341, 1343, 1344, or 1348, any rule or regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or any provision of Federal law relating to fraud against shareholders.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             107
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,375
<ALLOWANCES>                                       560
<INVENTORY>                                      3,157
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,511
<PP&E>                                           1,236
<DEPRECIATION>                                     750
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,009
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,963
<BONDS>                                          3,137
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,808
<OTHER-SE>                                          59
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,009
<SALES>                                         25,917
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,917
<CGS>                                           17,953
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 362
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,599
<INCOME-TAX>                                       133
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,466
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,466
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60
<FN>
<F1>Bad debt expense of 19 is included in the 4,956 reported as Selling and
Administrative expenses.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 4901.15 Appeals from denial of requests. ( a ) *Submittal of appeals.* A requester may appeal any adverse determination by the Disclosure Officer of a request under FOIA, including a denial of a request for access to records, expedited action, or fee waiver. The requester may file a written appeal within 90 days from the date of the denial or, in the case of a partial denial, 90 days from the date the requester receives the disclosed material. The appeal must include the grounds for appeal and any supporting statements or arguments. The requester must address the appeal to the General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, and must submit the appeal by mail, in-person delivery, or electronic telecommunication in accordance with the FOIA instructions on PBGC's website, *www.pbgc.gov .* To facilitate processing, the words “FOIA appeal” should appear prominently on the appeal.
( b ) *Receipt and consideration of appeal.* The General Counsel will note the date and time of receipt on each appeal and notify the requester thereof. Within 20 working days after receipt of an appeal (subject to extension under § 4901.16), the General Counsel will issue a decision on the appeal. ( 1 ) The General Counsel will determine de novo whether the denial of disclosure was in accordance with FOIA and this part.
( 2 ) Unless otherwise ordered by the court, the General Counsel may act on an appeal notwithstanding the pendency of an action for judicial relief in the same matter and, if no appeal has been filed, may treat the pending action as the filing of an appeal.
( c ) *Decision on appeal.* As to each item (or portion of an item) whose nondisclosure is appealed, the General Counsel will either— ( 1 ) Grant the appeal and so advise the requester in writing, in which case the records with respect to which the appeal is granted will promptly be made available to the requester; or
( 2 ) Deny the appeal and so advise the requester in writing with a brief statement of the reasons for the denial, including a reference to the specific exemption(s) authorizing the denial, an explanation of how each such exemption applies to the matter withheld, and notice of the provisions for judicial review in section 552(a)(4) of FOIA. The General Counsel's decision will be the final action of PBGC with respect to the request.
( d ) *Records of appeals.* Copies of both grants and denials of appeals will be collected in one file available in PBGC's electronic reading room under § 4901.4(d)(1) and indexed under § 4901.4(e).
[61 FR 34123, July 1, 1996, as amended at 68 FR 61358, Oct. 28, 2003; 82 FR 26992, June 13, 2017; 87 FR 43996, July 25, 2022]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANN CIPRIANI

- MAGES and ANTHONY G. MAGES , Appellant s ,

v.

THIRD FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND , Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2713

[ May 3, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Jeffrey Dana Gillen , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2013

- CA

006559

- XXXX

- MB.

Leanne L. Ohle of Ohle & Ohle, Stuart, for appellants.

Marian G. Kennady of Van Ness Law Firm, PLC, Deerfield Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

W ARNER , G ROSS and T AYLOR , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.