Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 102 / Thursday, May 25, 2000 / Notices 33811

A. Purpose

In accordance with the Small

Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631, et seq.),

contractors receiving a contract for more

than $10,000 agree to have small and

small disadvantaged business concerns

participate in the performance of the

contract as far as practicable.

Contractors receiving a contract or a

modification to a contract expected to

exceed $500,000 ($1 million for

construction) must submit a

subcontracting plan that provides

maximum practicable opportunities for

small and small disadvantaged business

concerns. Specific elements required to

be included in the plan are specified in

section 8(d) of the Small Business Act

and are implemented in FAR 19.7.

B. Annual Reporting Burden

Number of Respondents: 4,253.

Responses Per Respondent: 1.66.

Total Responses: 7,098.

Average Burden Hours Per Response:

12.90.

Total Burden Hours: 90,854.

Obtaining Copies of Justifications:

Requester may obtain a copy of the

proposal from the General Services

Administration, FAR Secretariat

(MVRS), Room 4035, 1800 F Street, NW,

Washington, DC 20405, telephone (202)

208–7312. Please cite OMB Control No.

9000–0007, Summary Subcontract

Report, in all correspondence.

Dated: May 22, 2000.

Edward C. Loeb,

Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division.

[FR Doc. 00–13146 Filed 5–24–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820–34–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. ER00–2383–000]

California Independent System

Operator Corporation; Notice of Filing

May 19, 2000.

Take notice that on May 3, 2000, the

California Independent System Operator

Corporation (ISO), tendered for filing an

correction regarding a proposed

amendment (Amendment No. 29), to the

ISO Tariff, which had been filed in the

above-referenced docket on May 2,

2000. The correction provided tariff

sheets containing Tariff sections that

were ‘‘rolled over’’ to subsequent pages

of the Tariff, as a result of changes and

additions made in the Amendment No.

29 filing, and corrected an error in the

section numbering on a certain Tariff

sheet that was included in the

Amendment No. 29 filing.

The ISO states that this filing has been

served upon the Public Utilities

Commission of California, the California

Energy Commission, the California

Electricity Oversight Board, and all

parties with effective Scheduling

Coordinator Service Agreements under

the ISO tariff.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest such filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Regulatory Commission, 888 First

Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in

accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and

385.214). All such motions and protests

should be filed on or before May 30,

2000. Protests will be considered by the

Commission to determine the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceedings. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection. This

filing may also be viewed on the

Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/

online/rims.htm (call 202–208–2222 for

assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–13114 Filed 5–24–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP00–51–001]

East Tennessee Natural Gas Company;

Notice of Amendment

May 19, 2000.

Take notice that on May 10, 2000,

East Tennessee Natural Gas Company

(East Tennessee), 1001 Louisiana,

Houston, Texas 77002, filed with the

Commission in Docket NO. CP00–51–

001 an amendment to the pending

application filed on December 17, 1999,

in Docket No. CP00–51–000, pursuant to

Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act

(NGA), to reflect change in the locations

of meter stations, main line valves, and

manifolds for which certificate

authorization is sought, all as more fully

set forth in the amendment which is

open to the public for inspection.

By the pending application in Docket

No. CP00–51–000, East Tennessee

proposes to construct, install, and

operate: (1) 15.16 miles of 12-inch

diameter pipeline looping in

Washington, Smyth, and Wythe

Counties, Virginia; (2) three meter

stations in McGinn, Greene, and Roane

Counties, Tennessee, and a modficiation

to an existing meter station in Morgan

County, Tennessee; (3) approximately

0.62 miles of 22-inch diameter

replacement pipe on East Tennessee’s

3100 Line in Smith and Overton

Counties, Tennessee. Finally, East

Tennessee’s 3100 Line: and (4)

approximately 450 feet of 10-inch and

12-inch diameter replacement pipeline,

in addition to two mainline valves on

East Tennessee’s 3200 Line at the

Tennessee River Crossing. Additionally,

East Tennessee seeks certain other

authorizations, including authorization

to up rate four compressor units located

at Station 3101 in Robertson County,

Tennessee, and Station 3210 in Marion

County, Tennessee, and authorization to

hydrostatically test to increase the

Maximum Allowable Operating

Pressure (MAOP) of 26.42 miles of pipe

on East Tennessee requests that the

Commission authorize the abandonment

of approximately 0.62 miles of pipe

being replaced align East Tennessee’s

3100 Line plus 250 feet of pipe, two

mainline valve assemblies and

miscellaneous fittings and

appurtenances being replaced along the

3200 Line by the above-referenced

replacement pipe. East Tennessee

submits that these activities are

necessary to provide additional firm

transportation service to eight customers

on the part of East Tennessee’s pipeline

system located in eastern Tennessee and

southwestern Virginia (Rocky Top

Expansion Project).

In the subject amendment, East

Tennessee seeks to modify its original

request for certificate authority by

requesting authorization to, itner alia,

change the locations of the proposed

Lenior City and Etowah meter stations.

East Tennessee now proposes to

construct, install, and operate the Lenior

City meter station at Mile Post 3.99,

instead of at Mile Post 4.35 south of

Main Line Valve 3112–1 as originally

proposed, on its 3100 Line in Roane

County, Tennessee. East Tennessee also

proposes to construct, install, and

operate the Etowah meter station at mile

Post 3.59 south of Main Line Valve

3217–1 as originally proposed, but on

the other side of the road, on its 3200

Line in McMinn County, Tennessee.

East Tennessee also proposes to

modify its original proposal with

various changes in work space

requirements and construction rights-ofway to meet the Commission’s template.

East Tennessee’s other proposed

modifications include the following:

33812 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 102 / Thursday, May 25, 2000 / Notices

1 90 FERC ¶ 61,174 (2000).

(1) Additional temporay work spaces

at Mainline Valve Section 3313,

Virginia, and Mainline Valve Section

3105, Tennessee;

(2) Seven new hydrostatic testing

manifold location in the vicinity of

Mainline Valve Section 3105,

Tennessee, and six new hydrostatic

testing manifold locations in the

vicinity of Mainline Valve Section 3107,

Tennessee;

(3) Four new main line valves,

replacement of main line valves, and

one new relief valve in the vicinity of

Mainline Valve Section 3105,

Tennessee;

(4) One new relief valve in vicinity of

Mainline Valve Section 3107,

Tennessee;

(5) New access road in vicinity of

Mainline Valve Section 3313, Virginia;

(6) Five temporary access roads in

vicinity of Mainline Valve Section 3105,

Tennessee, and four temporary access

roads in vicinity of Mainline Valve

Section 3107, Virginia—eight of these

temporary access roads would be

constructed within existing permanent

rights-of-way:

(7) One temporary access road in

vicinity of Tennessee River Crossing,

Mainline valve Section 3213–1A1/1A2,

Tennessee—this temporary access road

would be constructed within an existing

permanent right-of-way and existing

road.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

make any protest with reference to said

application should on or before June 9,

2000, file with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 888 First

Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, a

motion to intervene or a protest in

accordance with the requirements of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)

and the Regulations under the NGA (18

CFR 157.10) All protests filed with the

Commission will be considered by it in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken but will not serve to make the

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

to a proceeding or to participate as a

party in any hearing therein must file a

motion to intervene in accordance with

the Commission’s Rules.

Any questions regarding the

application should be directed to Susan

T. Halbach, Senior Counsel, P.O. Box

2511, Houston, Texas 77252, phone

number (713) 420–5751.

A person obtaining intervenor status

will be place on the service list

maintained by the Secretary of the

Commission and will receive copies of

all documents issued by the

Commission, filed by the applicant, or

filed by all other intervenors. An

intervenor can file for rehearing of any

Commission order and can petition for

court review of any such order.

However, an intervenor must serve

copies of comments or any other filing

it makes with the Commission to every

other intervenor in the proceeding, as

well as filing an original and 14 copies

with the Commission. A person does

not have to intervene, however, in order

to have comments considered. A person,

instead, may submit two copies of such

comments to the Secretary of the

Commission. Commenters will be

placed on the Commission’s

environmental mailing list, will receive

copies of environmental documents,

and will be able to participate in

meetings associated with the

Commission’s environmental review

process. Commenters will not be

required to serve copies of filed

document son all other parties.

However, commenters will not receive

copies of all documents filed by other

parties or issued by the Commission,

and will not have the right to seek

rehearing or appeal the Commission’s

final order to a Federal court.

Take further notice that, pursuant to

the authority contained in and subject to

the jurisdiction conferred upon the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

by Sections 7 and 15 of the NGA and the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure, a hearing will be held

without further notice before the

Commission or its designee on this

application if no motion to intervene is

filed within the time required herein, if

the Commission on its own review of

the matter finds that the proposal is

required by the public convenience and

necessity. If a motion for leave to

intervene is timely filed, or if the

Commission on its own motion believes

that a formal hearing is required, further

notice of such hearing will be duly

given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for East Tennessee to

appear or be represented at the hearing.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–13105 Filed 5–24–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. OA00–4–002]

Indianapolis Power & Light Company;

Notice of Filing

May 19, 2000.

Take notice that on May 1, 2000,

Indianapolis Power & Light Company

(Indianapolis) submitted revised

standards of conduct in response to the

Commission’s February 24, 2000 Order.1

Indianapolis states that it served

copies of the filing to all parties on the

service list, to the Indiana Utility

Regulatory Commission and others on

the official service list in this

proceeding.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426,

in accordance with Rules 211 and 214

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice

and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and

385.214). All such motions or protests

must be filed on or before June 5, 2000.

Protests will be considered by the

Commission to determine the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of Indianapolis’s filing

are on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection. This

filing may also be viewed on the

Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/

online/rims.htm (call 202–208–2222 for

assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–13107 Filed 5–24–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP00–286–000]

Koch Gateway Pipeline Company;

Notice of Proposed Changes to FERC

Gas Tariff

May 19, 2000.

Take notice that on May 16, 2000,

Koch Gateway Pipeline Company

(Koch) tendered for filing as part of its

FERC Gas Tariff, the following tariff

sheets, to become effective June 15,

2000: