alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 32992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13933]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), as part of its 
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a 
preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and 
federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or 
continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(A)]. This program 
helps to ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired 
format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, 
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of 
collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. 
Currently, the NEA is soliciting comments concerning the proposed 
information collection on arts participation in the U.S. A copy of the 
current information collection request can be obtained by contacting 
the office listed below in the addresses section of this notice.

DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the 
ADDRESSES section below on or before August 1, 2011. The NEA is 
particularly interested in comments which:
     Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;
     Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection of information including the validity 
of the methodology and assumptions used;
     Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
     Minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate 
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting 
electronic submissions of responses.

ADDRESSES: Sunil Iyengar, National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 616, Washington, DC 20506-0001, 
telephone (202) 682-5424 (this is not a toll-free number), fax (202) 
682-5677.

Kathleen Edwards,
Director, Administrative Services, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2011-13933 Filed 6-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
```
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bear Lake Recreation, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), we, Wayne Bassham, Principal Executive Officer, and Todd Albiston, Principal Financial Officer, of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:   (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.   Date:11/09/09By:/s/Wayne BasshamWayne BasshamPresident and DirectorBear Lake Recreation, Inc.Date:11/09/09By:/s/Todd AlbistonTodd AlbistonSecretary and DirectorBear Lake Recreation, Inc.
Exhibit 4.11

NOTICE REGARDING

THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF

8.00% SENIOR SECURED SECOND LIEN CONVERTIBLE NOTES

OF

LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY

 


	
Date:
	
February 27, 2015

	
 
	
 

	
To:
	
Investors of Layne Christensen Company’s 8.00% Senior Secured Second Lien Convertible Notes (the “Notes”)

	
 
	
 

	
From:
	
Layne Christensen Company

	
 
	
 

	
Re:
	
The Proposed Amendment to the Exchange and Subscription Agreement




 

Reference is hereby made to the Exchange and Subscription Agreement (the “Exchange and Subscription Agreement”), dated as of February 4, 2015, between you, Layne Christensen Company (the “Company”) and the subsidiary guarantors party thereto.  Capitalized terms used herein without definition have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Exchange and Subscription Agreement.

In connection with the Company’s issuance of updated preliminary financial performance expected to be reported for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015, the Company has requested you to execute and deliver an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Exchange and Subscription Agreement.  In order to induce you to execute and deliver the Amendment, the Company hereby agrees to modify the terms of the Notes as follows:

1. Initial Conversion Rate.  The definition of “Conversion Rate” in the Indenture will be replaced in its entirety with the following:

“Conversion Rate” means, initially, 85.4701 shares of Common Stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes, subject to adjustment as provided herein.

2. Make-Whole Table.  The table set forth in Section 10.07(d) of the Indenture will be replaced in its entirety with the following:

 


	
 
	
Stock Price

	
Effective Date
	
 
	
$8.36
	
 
	
$10.50
	
 
	
$11.70
	
 
	
$14.00
	
 
	
$16.38
	
 
	
$20.00
	
 
	
$30.00
	
 
	
$40.00
	
 
	
$50.00
	
 
	
$75.00

	
March 2, 2015
	
 
	
34.1471
	
 
	
34.1471
	
 
	
34.1471
	
 
	
25.8448
	
 
	
20.3391
	
 
	
15.1569
	
 
	
9.4000
	
 
	
6.7549
	
 
	
5.2996
	
 
	
3.4943

	
May 1, 2015
	
 
	
34.1471
	
 
	
34.1471
	
 
	
34.1471
	
 
	
24.5957
	
 
	
19.2663
	
 
	
14.4164
	
 
	
8.7902
	
 
	
6.3185
	
 
	
4.9640
	
 
	
3.2770

	
May 1, 2016
	
 
	
34.1471
	
 
	
34.1471
	
 
	
33.3196
	
 
	
19.5104
	
 
	
14.7656
	
 
	
11.9693
	
 
	
7.7540
	
 
	
5.6154
	
 
	
4.4546
	
 
	
2.9558

	
May 1, 2017
	
 
	
34.1471
	
 
	
34.1471
	
 
	
28.2212
	
 
	
13.3534
	
 
	
9.8023
	
 
	
7.5550
	
 
	
4.8841
	
 
	
3.3717
	
 
	
2.5571
	
 
	
1.5154

	
May 1, 2018
	
 
	
34.1471
	
 
	
25.6779
	
 
	
21.0012
	
 
	
6.7418
	
 
	
4.9041
	
 
	
3.9783
	
 
	
2.5925
	
 
	
1.8792
	
 
	
1.4753
	
 
	
0.9449

	
May 1, 2019
	
 
	
34.1471
	
 
	
9.7680
	
 
	
0.0000
	
 
	
0.0000
	
 
	
0.0000
	
 
	
0.0000
	
 
	
0.0000
	
 
	
0.0000
	
 
	
0.0000
	
 
	
0.0000




* * *

 

 

 





- 1 -




 


	
Sincerely,

	
 

	
Layne Christensen Company

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By: 
	
 
	
/s/ Andy Atchison

	
 
	
 
	
Name: Andy Atchison

	
 
	
 
	
Title:   SVP & CFO




 

[Signature Page to Notice Regarding Issuance and Sale of

8.00% Senior Secured Second Lien Convertible Notes]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,749,956
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,210,933
<ALLOWANCES>                                       516,671
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,000,733
<PP&E>                                           1,559,620
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,384,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,961,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,176,918
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            30,627
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,374,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,961,155
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,767,429
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,715,069
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,972,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,743,069
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,743,069
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.80
                                                 
                                               

</TABLE>
1

The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief Judge, United States

District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

___________

No. 95-2772

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

Donald Larkin, Jr., * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: December 29, 1995

 Filed: January 19, 1996 ___________

Before WOLLMAN, MAGILL, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Donald Larkin, Jr., an African-American, appeals the 181-month

sentence imposed by the district court1 after he pleaded guilty to

possessing cocaine base (crack) and cocaine with intent to

distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and possessing

a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking offense, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). We affirm.

Following the preparation of his presentence report, Larkin

objected to his offense-level calculation. Larkin contended that

no scientific difference existed between crack cocaine and powder

cocaine, and that the penalty provisions set forth in 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(b) were thus rendered inapplicable by operation of the rule
-2-

of lenity. He also argued that Congress enacted section 841(b) in

an arbitrary and irrational manner, resulting in a disparate impact

upon African-Americans in violation of his due process and equal

protection rights.

Larkin relied on United States v. Davis, 864 F. Supp. 1303

(N.D. Ga. 1994), appeal pending (No. 95-8057 11th Cir.), in which

the district court, after an evidentiary hearing, held that the

terms "cocaine" and "cocaine base" were synonymous; that the

penalty provisions of section 841(b) set forth a scientifically

meaningless distinction between cocaine and cocaine base; and that

the heightened penalties for cocaine base must be ignored by

operation of the rule of lenity. 864 F. Supp. at 1309. In

support, Larkin submitted copies of the Davis court records--

including Davis's memorandum of law, the hearing transcript, and

the district court's decision. Larkin renews his claims on appeal.

We conclude Larkin's rule-of-lenity argument is foreclosed by

our decision in United States v. Jackson, 64 F.3d 1213, 1219-20

(8th Cir. 1995), and his due process and equal protection arguments

are foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Jackson, 67 F.3d

1359, 1367 (8th Cir. 1995). We need not address Larkin's

contention that a "less deferential" or "heightened" rational-basis

test applies, because he did not raise this argument below and

there is no plain error. See Fritz v. United States, 995 F.2d 136,

137 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 887 (1994).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 4022.25 Five-year phase-in of benefit guarantee. ( a ) *Scope.* This section applies to the guarantee of benefit increases which have been in effect for less than five years.
( b ) *Phase-in formula.* The amount of a benefit increase computed pursuant to § 4022.24 shall be guaranteed to the extent provided in the following formula: the number of years the benefit increase has been in effect, not to exceed five, multiplied by the greater of (1) 20 percent of the amount computed pursuant to § 4022.24; or (2) $20 per month.
( c ) *Computation of years.* In computing the number of years a benefit increase has been in effect, each complete 12-month period ending on or before the termination date during which such benefit increase was in effect constitutes one year.
( d ) *Multiple benefit increases.* In applying the formula contained in paragraph (b) of this section, multiple benefit increases within any 12-month period ending on or before the termination date and calculated from that date are aggregated and treated as one benefit increase.
( e ) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section, a benefit increase described in paragraph (a) of this section shall be guaranteed only if PBGC determines that the plan was terminated for a reasonable business purpose and not for the purpose of obtaining the payment of benefits by PBGC.
( f ) *PPA 2006 bankruptcy termination.* In a PPA 2006 bankruptcy termination, “bankruptcy filing date” is substituted for “termination date” each place that “termination date” appears in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section. Example: A plan amendment that was adopted and effective in February 2007 increased a participant's benefit by $300 per month (as computed under § 4022.24). The contributing sponsor of the plan filed a bankruptcy petition in March 2009 and the plan has a termination date in April 2010. PBGC's guarantee of the participant's benefit increase is limited to $120 ($300 × 40%), because the increase was made more than 2 years but less than 3 years before the bankruptcy filing date.
[61 FR 34028, July 1, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 16956, Apr. 8, 2002; 76 FR 34603, June 14, 2011; 83 FR 49804, Oct. 3, 2018]
§ 500.140 General. Whenever the Secretary believes that the Act or these regulations have been violated he shall take such action and institute such proceedings as he deems appropriate, including (but not limited to) the following: ( a ) Recommend to the Attorney General the institution of criminal proceedings against any person who willfully and knowingly violates the Act or these regulations;
( b ) Recommend to the Attorney General the institution of criminal proceedings against any farm labor contractor who recruits, hires, employs, or uses, with knowledge, the services of any illegal alien, as defined in § 500.20(n) of these regulations, if such farm labor contractor has: ( 1 ) Been refused issuance or renewal of, or has failed to obtain, a Certificate of Registration, or
( 2 ) Is a farm labor contractor whose certificate has been suspended or revoked;
( c ) Petition any appropriate District Court of the United States for temporary or permanent injunctive relief to prohibit violation of the Act or these regulations by any person;
( d ) Assess a civil money penalty against any person for any violation of the Act or these regulations;
( e ) Refer any unpaid civil money penalty which has become a final and unappealable order of the Secretary or a final judgment of a court in favor of the Secretary to the Attorney General for recovery;
( f ) Revoke or suspend or refuse to issue or renew any Certificate of Registration authorized by the Act or these regulations;
( g ) Deny the facilities and services afforded by the Wagner-Peyser Act to any farm labor contractor who refuses or fails to produce, when asked, a valid Certificate of Registration;
( h ) Institute action in any appropriate United States District Court against any person who, contrary to the provisions of section 505(a) of the Act, discriminates against any migrant or seasonal agricultural worker.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KAREEM TODD,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 728 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Howard L. Schrott, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Liberty Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. [Reserved];  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: October 25, 2005     /s/ Howard L. Schrott     Howard L. Schrott  Chief Financial Officer  
43
From: Muldoon, Albert (OST)

To: Rich Sewell (rich.sewell@alaska.gov) ; Alaska DOT, Linda Bustamante ; "markgorman@cityofsitka.com"

Cc: Tom Williams ; Schlemmer, Kevin (OST)

Subject: Essential Air Service at Chatham and Funter Bay, AK - Request for Comments - Due May 30, 2014

Date: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:16:47 AM

Attachments: 2014-2016 USDOT EAS Proposal for CYM & FNR Service.pdf

All,

Please find attached to this email the proposal of Ward Air (the incumbent) to provide Essential Air

Service at Chatham and Funter Bay, AK. This was the only timely-filed proposal and it has been

posted to the docket (DOTOST-1997-3134). Ward Air proposes to continue its current level of service,

providing Chatham with one monthly round trip to Juneau, and Funter Bay with one weekly round trip

to Juneau.

The comments of the communities and the state are a critically important element in our carrierselection decision. We ask that you and the other interested parties carefully review the proposals and

provide us with any comments no later than May 30, 2014. We will docket this email as well as any

comments received. Please feel free to contact myself or the carriers with any questions.

Regards,

A.J.

A.J. Muldoon

Transportation Industry Analyst

Office of Aviation Analysis

U.S. Department of Transportation

albert.muldoon@dot.gov

(202) 366-1058
#### § 402.7 Effect of acknowledgment and filing by the Office of Labor-Management Standards.

Acknowledgment by the Office of Labor-Management Standards of the receipt of reports and documents submitted for filing under this part, is intended solely to inform the sender of the receipt thereof by the Office, and neither such acknowledgment nor the filing of such reports and documents by the Office constitutes express or implied approval thereof, or in any manner indicates that the content of any such report or document fulfills the reporting or other requirements of the Act, or of the regulations in this chapter, applicable thereto.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 23


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference and the inclusion herein in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of The Liberty Corporation of our report dated
February 6, 1998, included in the 1997 Annual Report to Shareholders of The
Liberty Corporation and included in Form 10-K in Exhibit 13.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedules of The Liberty
Corporation listed in Item 14(a). These schedules are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedules referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-34314) pertaining to the 1983 Performance Incentive
Compensation Program, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-34816)
pertaining to The Liberty Corporation and Adopting Related Employers' 401(k)
Thrift Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-34814) pertaining to
The Cosmos Broadcasting Corporation Profit Sharing Retirement Plan and Trust, in
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-34815) pertaining to The Liberty
Corporation Profit Sharing Plan and Trust, in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-22591) pertaining to The Cosmos Broadcasting Corporation Retirement
and Savings Plan, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-22285)
pertaining to The Liberty Corporation Retirement and Savings Plan, and in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-30151) pertaining to The Performance
Incentive Compensation Program of our report dated February 6, 1998 with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of The Liberty
Corporation included and incorporated by reference in the annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.



                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Greenville, South Carolina
March 24, 1998


                                       64