alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         1,673,888
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      74,568
<MORTGAGE>                                     244,821
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   49,169
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               2,161,477
<CASH>                                          61,786
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             278,165
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         337,841
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,184,758
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              1,890,786
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  36,991
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           28,154
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                191,914
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           37,369
<PREFERRED>                                     20,999
<COMMON>                                       182,994
<OTHER-SE>                                     470,454
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,184,758
<PREMIUMS>                                     350,692
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            158,319
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               6,226
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 145,019
<BENEFITS>                                     227,927
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     45,564
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           146,209
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                111,577
<INCOME-TAX>                                    36,626
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             74,951
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    74,951
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.34
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
(79 South. 631)

#### BONDS v. MARSH et al.

(8 Div. 475.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 28, 1918.)

Sales <©=>179(4) — Breach by Seller —Acceptance and Retention oe Goods.

Id *an*action for *breach*of contract in the sale of an automobile by the delivery of a secondhand one instead of a new car, where evidence supported pleas that plaintiff retained the car after discovering that it was secondhand and did not offer to return it, but paid the balanca of the purchase price, defendants were entitled to the general affirmative charge.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall County; W. W. Haralson, Judge.

Action by W. M. Bonds against J. B. Marsh and another for breach of contract. Fr<»n a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Wm. C. Rayburn, ,of Guntersville, for appellant. Street & Bradford, of Guntersville, for appellees.

SAMFORD, J.

The complaint was in two counts, claiming damages for breach of contract in the sale of a Ford automobile, alleging compliance on the part of the plaintiff and breach by defendants, by a delivery by them of a secondhand car, which had been used, and considerably damaged and worn, instead of a new car as contracted for.

The defendants, besides the general issue, filed three special pleas: (2) That plaintiff accepted the car that was delivered to him as a performance by defendants of his part of the contract; (3) that, after discovery by the plaintiff that the car delivered to him was not a new car, plaintiff retained said car and did not offer to return said car to defendants; and (4) that, after discovery by plaintiff that the car was not a new one,- plaintiff voluntarily paid to defendants the balance of the purchase price thereof. There were no demurrers to these pleas. With the issues as thus made, plaintiff testified that, two days after the sale and delivery, he discovered two scars on one of the tires about three-fourths of an inch long, that the position of the horn had been changed, and that he had been delivered a secondhand .car; that, at the time of the purchase, he paid one-half cash and gave his note for the balance, and, with the knowledge of the defects testified to, he voluntarily paid the balance due on the purchase price. There was no evidence that 'the car was considerably damaged and worn, except the testimony as to the cut on one tire and the change of the horn. It was also shown, without dispute, after discovery by plaintiff that the car delivered to him was not a new car, plaintiff retained the car. and did not offer to return it to defendants.

Under the issnes as made by the pleadings, the defendants were entitled to the general affirmative charge. This being the case, it becomes unnecessary to pass upon the various rulings of the court, as, if the trial court was in error, such error would be without injury. Travelers’ Ins. Co. v. Lazenby, 80 South. 25,1 Flowers *&*Peagler v. Smith Lumber Co., 157 Ala. 505, 47 South. 1022; L. & N. v. Johnson, 128 Ala. 638, 30 South. 580.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

Post, p. *549.*
Exhibit 32.1

    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of First Coastal Bancshares (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Don
M. Griffith, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1)    The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                                /s/ Don M. Griffith
                                                -------------------
                                                Don M. Griffith
                                                Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2003


                                       19
§ 4221.13 Filing and issuance rules. ( a ) *Method and date of filing.* The PBGC applies the rules in subpart A of part 4000 of this chapter to determine permissible methods of filing with the PBGC under this part. The PBGC applies the rules in subpart C of part 4000 of this chapter to determine the date that a submission under this part was filed with the PBGC.
( b ) *Where to file.* See § 4000.4 of this chapter for information on where to file.
( c ) *Method and date of issuance.* The PBGC applies the rules in subpart B of part 4000 of this chapter to determine permissible methods of issuance under this part. The PBGC applies the rules in subpart C of part 4000 of this chapter to determine the date that an issuance under this part was provided.
[68 FR 61356, Oct. 28, 2003]
### Geology and underground waters of the southeastern part of the Texas Coastal Plain

By: Alexander Deussen

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp335

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
----

Action brought on 27 July 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Hellenic Republic

(Case C-326/04)

(2004/C 239/11)

An action against the Hellenic Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 27 July 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by D. Martin and E. Tserepa-Lacombe, members of the Commission's Legal Service.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for implementing the directive in national law expired on 19 July 2003.

----

(1)OJ L 180 of 19.7.2000, p. 22.

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

** **

 

In connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedMarch 31, 2004, I, Anthony J. Gould, Executive Vice President, ChiefFinancial and Chief Accounting Officer of  the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  that:

 

(1)            such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for theperiod ended March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2004, fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofWestern Sierra Bancorp.

 
| Dated:  May 10, 2004              |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
|                                   | /s/ Anthony J. Gould |   |
| Chief Financial and Accounting Officer |

 

----
(77 South. 1003.)

#### HACKWORTH et al. v. J. R. WATKINS MEDICAL CO.

(8 Div. 596.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Feb. 12, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; W. W. Haralson, Judge.

SAMFORD, J.

Affirmed on certificate.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPALEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL

FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the accompanying QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of iVillage Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2005,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the undersigned, DouglasW. McCormick, Chief Executive Officer of iVillage Inc., and Steven A. Elkes,Chief Financial Officer of iVillage Inc., each hereby certifies pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          such Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)          the informationcontained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of iVillage Inc.

 

 
| Date: May 10, 2005 | /s/ Douglas W. McCormick             |   |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|               | Douglas W. McCormick                 |
|               | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|               |                                 |
|               |                                 |
| Date: May 10, 2005 | /s/ Steven A. Elkes                  |   |
|               | Steven A. Elkes                      |
|               | Chief Financial Officer,             |
|               | Executive Vice President, Operations |
|               | and Business Affairs, and Secretary  |
|                    |                                      |        |  |

 

*A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to iVillage Inc. and will be retained byiVillage Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.*

 

*Theinformation in this Exhibit 32 is being furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to theliabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by referencein any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the ExchangeAct, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.*

 

----
EX-10.39



 Exhibit 10.39 

First Amendment to 

Combination Agreement 

This First Amendment to Combination Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of February 26, 2015 by Fenix Parts,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Fenix”), Brian Shell, Jason Finley, Adam Mervis, Mervis 2006, LLC, and Michael Stanley (each a “Member” and together the “Members”), and Green Oak Investments LLC dba
GO Auto Recycling, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”). 
 Whereas, the Parties have entered into a
Combination Agreement dated as of August 14, 2014 (the “Combination Agreement”); and 
 Whereas, the Parties desire to
amend the Combination Agreement as set forth herein, 
 It is agreed as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Capitalized terms without definition shall have the same meaning as given in the Combination Agreement. 

  

	 	2.	Section 9.1(a)(3) of the Combination Agreement shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following: 

  

	 	(3)	Closing has not occurred by May 15, 2015 (the “Outside Date”) (other than as a result of Fenix’s breach of or failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement); 


 

	 	3.	Section 9.1(b)(3) of the Combination Agreement shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following: 

  

	 	(3)	Closing has not occurred by May 15, 2015 (the “Outside Date”) (other than as a result of the Members’ breach of or failure to perform their obligations under this Agreement);


  

	 	4.	The definitions of “Interim Balance Sheet” and “Interim Financial Statements” shall be modified to include the Company’s balance sheet and financial statements as of and for the period ended
December 31, 2014. 

  

	 	5.	Except as expressly amended by the terms of this Amendment, the Combination Agreement is in all respects ratified and confirmed. 


Signatures appear on the following page 

  
 1 








 In witness, the Parties have executed this Amendment. 

 

			
	Fenix Parts, Inc.
		
	By		 /s/ Kent Robertson

			Kent Robertson
			Chief Executive Officer
		
			 /s/ Brian Shell

			Brian Shell
		
			 /s/ Jason Finley

			Jason Finley
		
			 /s/ Adam Mervis

			Adam Mervis
		
			 /s/ Michael Stanley

			Michael Stanley
	  
 Mervis 2006, LLC

		
	By		 /s/ Michael Mervis

	Name:		Michael Mervis
	Title:		Member
	  
 Green Oak Investments LLC

dba GO Auto Recycling

		
	By		 /s/ Jason M. Finley

	Name:		Jason M. Finley
	Title:		Member


 Signature page to First Amendment to Combination Agreement 

  
 2
----

1 November 2004 — New version of EUR-Lex!

europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/

The new site incorporates the Celex service and provides free and easy access in 20 languages to the largest documentary database on EU law.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 35 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 35

    To amend Public Law 108-331 to provide for the construction and 
 related activities in support of the Very Energetic Radiation Imaging 
          Telescope Array System (VERITAS) project in Arizona.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2008

   Mr. Leahy (for himself, Mr. Cochran, and Mr. Dodd) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    To amend Public Law 108-331 to provide for the construction and 
 related activities in support of the Very Energetic Radiation Imaging 
          Telescope Array System (VERITAS) project in Arizona.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOCATION OF VERITAS PROJECT.

    Public Law 108-331 (118 Stat. 1281) is amended--
            (1) in the long title, by striking ``on Kitt Peak near 
        Tucson, Arizona'' and inserting ``in Arizona''; and
            (2) in section 1, by striking ``on Kitt Peak near Tucson, 
        Arizona'' and inserting ``at the Fred Lawrence Whipple 
        Observatory Base Camp on Mount Hopkins, Arizona, or other 
        similar location''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          63,680
<SECURITIES>                                     6,481
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,557
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     45,177
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               160,117
<PP&E>                                         126,406
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,505
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 261,474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,223
<BONDS>                                          4,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,066
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,295
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   261,474
<SALES>                                        204,835
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               204,835
<CGS>                                          162,642
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  162,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,209
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,931
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,278
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,278
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0030

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

CORENA MARIE MOUNTAIN CHEIF, 

Defendant and Appellant, 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension 

of time, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 29, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 23 2022

08/23/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0030
EX-10.22



 Exhibit 10.22 

Second Amendment to the 

INVENTIV GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. 

2010 Equity Incentive Plan 

Pursuant to Section 9 of the inVentiv Group Holdings, Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), the Plan is hereby amended
as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 4(a) of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 


(a) Number of Shares. A maximum of 781,588 shares of Stock may be delivered in satisfaction of Awards under the
Plan, including ISOs. To the extent consistent with Section 422, (i) shares of Stock withheld by the Company in payment of the exercise price of the Award or in satisfaction of Award-related tax withholding requirements and shares of Stock
underlying Awards that are settled in cash, expire, become unexercisable without having been exercised, or are forfeited or repurchased by the Company for cash shall not be treated as having been delivered under the Plan; provided, however, that 25%
of any shares of Stock underlying Stock Options other than the Walter Options (as defined below) that are withheld by the Company in payment of the exercise price of the Award or in satisfaction of Award-related tax withholding requirements and
shares of Stock underlying Awards that are settled in cash, expire, become unexercisable without having been exercised, or are forfeited or repurchased by the Company for cash, in each case at any time after January 27, 2012, shall be treated
as having been delivered under the Plan (rounded to the nearest whole share), and (ii) Stock issued under awards of an acquired company that are converted, replaced or adjusted in connection with the acquisition will not reduce the number of
shares available for Awards under the Plan. “Walter Options” shall mean the MoM Performance-Based Options granted to R. Blane Walter under the Plan on August 11, 2010. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, inVentiv Group Holdings, Inc. has caused this instrument of amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer this
14th day of March, 2014. 
  

			
	INVENTIV GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Eric M. Sherbert
#### § 2580.412-22 Interests held in agents, brokers and surety companies.

Section 13(c) prohibits the placing of bonds, required to be obtained pursuant to section 13, with any surety or other company, or through any agent or broker in whose business operations a plan or any party in interest in a plan has significant control or financial interest, direct or indirect. An interpretation of this section has been issued (§ 2580.412-36 of this chapter).