alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Lancer
Orthodontics, Inc.'s annual 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                         106,292
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,527,706
<ALLOWANCES>                                   175,986
<INVENTORY>                                  2,207,154
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,827,011
<PP&E>                                       2,393,244
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,209,030)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,327,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          888,820
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    185,242
<COMMON>                                     4,697,115
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,444,056)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,327,121
<SALES>                                      6,159,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,159,496
<CGS>                                        3,779,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,779,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,607
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,636
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,604
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             42,032
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    42,032
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
### Water resources of the Tacoma area, Washington

By: William Colvin GriffinJ.E. ScevaH. A. SwensonM.J. Mundorff

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1499B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 761

# Disc Contents

----

#### Home | Acronyms | Contents | Navigation | Photos and Maps | Logs | Metadata

----

Click on files or folders to view the file or access folder contents.

----

#### Home | Acronyms | Contents | Navigation | Photos and Maps | Logs | Metadata

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |            U.S. Geological Survey                                                URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/761/pubs761/html/contents.html            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact                        Page Last Modified: Thursday, April 11, 2013, 10:12:43 AM
(81 South. 139)

#### MATTHEWS v. STATE.

(3 Div. 339.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 21, 1919.)

1. Criminal -Law <&wkey;364(7) — Evidence—Res Gestas.

In prosecution for buying, receiving, or concealing stolen property, trial court should have permitted defendant to explain facts and circumstances under which property in question was received by him, and statements made to him at time of delivery by person who committed larceny; such matters being part of res gestae.

2. Criminal Law <&wkey;396(2) — Evidence — Whole oe Conversation.

In prosecution for buying, receiving, or concealing stolen property, where state was permitted to prove part of conversation which took place between defendant and person who committed larceny and delivered property to him at time of delivery, defendant should have been permitted to prove whole of conversation.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; Leon McCord, Judge.

Perry Matthews was convicted of buying, receiving, or concealing stolen property, etc., and appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

Hill, Hill, Wbiting & Thomas, of Montgomery, for appellant.

Emmett S. Thigpen, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRICKEtN, J.

The defendant was convicted for the offense of buying, receiving, or concealing stolen property, knowing that it had been stolen, and not having the intent to restore it to the owner, etc.

[1,2] On the trial of this case, the court in its rulings' upon the evidence declined to let the defendant explain the facts and circumstances under which the stolen property in question was received by him, and the statements made to him at the time of the delivery of the property in question by one Tom Jeans, who it appears is conceded to be the party who committed the larceny. This evidence was relevant for two reasons: (1) The defendant had the right to explain his possession of the stolen goods and all the facts and circumstances immediately incident to the goods coming into his possession, this being a part of the res gestte of the offense, and this testimony was therefore admissible for that reason; (2) the court had permitted the state, by Its wituesses Cosby and Rapport, to prove a part of the conversation which took place between the defendant and the said Tom Jeans, at the time of the delivery of the stolen sacks to the defendant by Jeans. Under this state of evidence, the whole conversation which occurred at that 'time and place should have been allowed, and the court's ruling in not allowing the defendant to testify to the whole conversation was error. When a part of the conversation or transaction has been proven by one party, the other may call for the whole of it. Gibson v. State, 91 Ala. 64, 9 South. 171; Davis v. State, 92 Ala. 20, 9 South. 616.

For the error pointed out, the judgment of the lower court must he reversed, and the cause remanded.

Other errors insisted upon on this appeal in all probability will not arise upon another trial of this case, rendering it unnecessary to deal with the two other questions presented.

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC. (REGISTRANT)
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David B. Swank, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify to the
best of my knowledge and belief pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005,
which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Registrant.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter
63 title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.

Date:  May 13, 2005                            /s/ DAVID B. SWANK
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  David B. Swank
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 99.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of

HORIZON BANCORPORATION, INC.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc., hereby certifies that:

1. Horizon Bancorporation, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc.

/S/ Charles S. ConoleyCharles S. Conoley
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 9, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eddie Torres, Jr., Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 511]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.), rendered September 9, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, possession of burglar’s tools, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is without merit *(see, People v Sullivan,*153 AD2d 223, 231).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Friedmann, J. P., Florio, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

 23 September 2004

(2004/C 237/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
#### Junior Lee VAUGHAN, Appellant, v. John W. GARDNER, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Appellee.

No. 11151.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued May 30, 1967.

Decided May 31, 1967.

Franklin W. Kern, Charleston, W. Va., for appellant.

Charles M. Love, III, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Milton J. Ferguson, U. S. Atty., and W. Warren Upton, Asst. U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF and WINTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Secretary, on an extensive record, denied claimant’s application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits under §§ 216(i) and 223 of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S. C.A. §§ 416(i) and 423. The district judge affirmed the Secretary’s determination.

We have reviewed the record and, giving full effect to the elements of proof relevant to consideration of a case of this type, Underwood v. Ribicoff, 298 F.2d 850 (4 Cir. 1962), and Thomas v. Celebrezze, 331 F.2d 541 (4 Cir. 1963), we are satisfied that the Secretary’s determination has ample evidentiary support.

The judgment of the district court is Affirmed.
Exhibit 4.2

                        [LETTERHEAD OF LOEHMANN'S, INC.]

                                                                    May 12, 2000

                       Securities and Exchange Commission
                             450 Fifth Avenue, N.W.
                              Washington, D.C. 2054

                           Loehmann's, Inc. Form 10-K
                           --------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         In accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Loehmann's,
Inc. (the "Registrant") has not filed herewith any instrument with respect to
long-term debt not being registered where the total number of securities
authorized thereunder does not exceed ten percent (10%) of the total assets of
the Registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The Registrant
hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any such agreement to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon request.

                                    Sincerely,

                                    LOEHMANN'S, INC.

                                    /s/ Robert Glass
                                    ----------------
                                    Robert Glass
                                    President, Chief Operating Officer,
                                      Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
                                      and Director
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 14, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 14, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18A0785. DNKN HOLDINGS, LLC v. DAVE MCKEMEY d/b/a MCKEMEY CONCRETE.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
Exhibit 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


This 14th day of August, 2003.




                                         Charles  M.  Jones,  III
                                         Chief  Executive  Officer



                                         David  J.  Baranko
                                         Chief  Financial  Officer


<PAGE>
#### Robert W. Pryor, receiver, appellee, *v.*Allen S. Gray, appellant.

[Submitted December 10th, 1906.

Decided March 4th, 1907.]

On appeal from an order of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Grey, whose opinion is reported in *70 N. J. Eq. (4 Robb.) 418.*

*Mr. Malcolm*MacLear, for the appellant.

*Mr. Frank Benjamin,*for the appellee.

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from, which is an order overruling a demurrer to an amended bill of complaint, will be affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Grey in so far as that opinion discusses the merits. Two grounds of demurrer, viz., the fourth and fifth, were not considered by the vice-chancellor for the reason that they could have been assigned under a previous demurrer that had been filed to the original bill, and this circumstance was held by the learned vice-chancellor to be a waiver of any right of objection to the amended bill upon these same grounds.

Without passing upon the correctness of the vice-chancellor’s conclusion upon this point of practice we have considered the grounds of demurrer referred to upon their merits.

The fourth ground of demurrer is, that the amended bill of complaint does not show that there are any moneys due by the insolvent company to persons other than the defendant, or that persons other than the defendant are interested, in the estate of the insolvent company.

The fifth ground of demurrer is, that the amended bill of *437complaint does not show that there are not sufficient moneys to pay all the debts of the insolvent company.

We have examined the amended bill of complaint in the light of these criticisms, and our conclusion is that the matters referred to are shown by such bill with sufficient certainty for all purposes involved in the pending litigation, and hence that the demurrant suffered no injury by the action of the court below that entitles him to a reversal of its order.

*For*affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill—15.

*For*reversal—None.
§ 4281.33 Restoration of benefits. ( a ) *General.* The plan sponsor of a plan that has been amended to reduce benefits under this subpart shall amend the plan to restore those benefits before adopting any amendment increasing benefits under the plan. A plan is not required to make retroactive benefit payments with respect to any benefit that was reduced and subsequently restored in accordance with this section.
( b ) *Notice to the PBGC.* The plan sponsor shall notify the PBGC in writing of any restoration under this section. The notice shall include the information specified in § 4281.32 (d)(1) through (d)(4); a statement that a plan amendment restoring benefits has been adopted, the date of adoption, and the effective date of the amendment; and a certification, signed by the plan sponsor or its duly authorized representative, that the amendment has been adopted in accordance with this section.
110TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 5

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proclaiming Casimir Pulaski to be an honorary citizen of

the United States posthumously.

Whereas Casimir Pulaski was a Polish military officer who

fought on the side of the American colonists against the

British in the American Revolutionary War;

Whereas Benjamin Franklin recommended that General

George Washington accept Casimir Pulaski as a volunteer in the American Cavalry and said that Pulaski was

‘‘renowned throughout Europe for the courage and bravery he displayed in defense of his country’s freedom’’;

Whereas after arriving in America, Casimir Pulaski wrote to

General Washington, ‘‘I came here, where freedom is

being defended, to serve it, and to live or die for it.’’;

Whereas the first military engagement of Casimir Pulaski

with the British was on September 11, 1777, at the Battle of Brandywine, and his courageous charge in this engagement averted a disastrous defeat of the American

Cavalry and saved the life of George Washington;

Whereas on September 15, 1777, George Washington elevated Casimir Pulaski to the rank of Brigadier General

of the American Cavalry;
 †

2

SJ 5 ES

Whereas Casimir Pulaski formed the Pulaski Cavalry Legion,

and in February 1779, this legion ejected the British occupiers from Charleston, South Carolina;

Whereas in October 1779, Casimir Pulaski mounted an assault against British forces in Savannah, Georgia;

Whereas on the morning of October 9, 1779, Casimir Pulaski

was mortally wounded and was taken aboard the American ship USS Wasp, where he died at sea on October

11, 1779;

Whereas before the end of 1779, the Continental Congress

resolved that a monument should be erected in honor of

Casimir Pulaski;

Whereas in 1825, General Lafayette laid the cornerstone for

the Casimir Pulaski monument in Savannah, Georgia;

and

Whereas in 1929, Congress passed a resolution recognizing

October 11 of each year as Pulaski Day in the United

States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Casimir Pulaski is proclaimed to be an honorary cit4 izen of the United States posthumously.

Passed the Senate March 19, 2007.

Attest:

Secretary.
110TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 5

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proclaiming Casimir Pulaski to be an honorary

citizen of the United States posthumously.
#### § 452.13 Extraterritorial application.

Although the application of the Act is limited to the activities of persons and organizations within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States,[14] an international, national or intermediate body is not exempted from the requirements of the Act by virtue of the participation of its foreign locals or foreign membership in its elections. For example, votes received from Canadian members in referendum elections held by an international must have been cast under procedures meeting the minimum requirements of the Act, and Canadian delegates participating at conventions of the international at which officers are elected must have been elected by secret ballot.

###### Footnotes -
  452.13

[14] See § 451.6 of this chapter.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

D ’ ANDRE BANNISTER

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 915

[ September 1, 2022 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Kirk Volker , Judge; L.T.

Case No. 502002CF009204A

.

D ’ Andre Bannister, Punta Gorda, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., M A Y and G ERBER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS**


**ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




Each
      of
      the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 fully complies
      with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      the Company.




This
      13th
      day of November, 2006.




/s/ John
              H.
              Monk, Jr.John
              H. Monk, Jr.Chief
                Executive Officer




/s/ David
              J.
              BarankoDavid
              J. BarankoChief
                  Financial Officer