alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# TIME AND DATE: 

11 a.m., Friday, June 30, 2000.

# PLACE: 

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Surveillance Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-12362  Filed 5-12-00; 11:31 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
### Analysis of water quality of the Mahoning River in Ohio

By: Gene A. BednarCharles R. CollierWilliam Perry Cross

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1859C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 91
          - [Docket No. FAA-2000-7110; Amendment No. 91-262]
          - RIN 2120-AG94

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

This action amends the language regarding aircraft operating in accordance with Special Visual Flight Rules (SVFR). Specially, this action will permit a general aviation pilot at a satellite airport where weather reporting is not available, to depart in meteorological conditions less than basic Visual Flight Rules (VFR) weather minimums provided that the pilot determines that he has the requisite flight visibility. The FAA is taking this action to reduce the number of unnecessary flight delays being faced by general aviation aircraft while providing an equivalent level of safety.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

The rule is effective on May 23, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Avis P. Person, Airspace and Rules Division (ATA-400), Air Traffic Airspace Management Program, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone number (202) 267-8783.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 24, 2000 (65 FR 16114). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on May 23, 2000. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this final rule will become effective on that date.                

Issued in Washington, DC, on May 12, 2000. 

Donald P. Byrne,

Assistant Chief Counsel, Regulations Division.

[FR Doc. 00-12561 Filed 5-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### CLEVELAND RY CO v GOLDMAN etc.

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21855.

Decided March 5, 1930

Marshall, CJ., Kinkade, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATIONS


     I Harold Kramer, certify that:


     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Visual Bible International, Inc.;

     2.   Based upon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.

     3.   Based upon my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

     4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
the registrant and have:

          (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior
to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date");
and

          (c)  Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

     5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, th the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a)  All significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls.

     6.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: November 20, 2002            /s/Harold Kramer
                                   ----------------------------
                                   Harold Kramer
                                   Principal Executive Officer and
                                   Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 23 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 23

  Expressing the sense of Congress that provisions that provoke veto 
    threats from the President should not be included on bills that 
appropriate funds for the implementation of recommendations of the Base 
                  Closure and Realignment Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2007

  Mr. Brownback (for himself and Mr. Roberts) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress that provisions that provoke veto 
    threats from the President should not be included on bills that 
appropriate funds for the implementation of recommendations of the Base 
                  Closure and Realignment Commission.

Whereas Congress and President George W. Bush approved the final recommendations 
        of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission under the 2005 
        round of defense base closure and realignment;
Whereas these recommendations propose major changes in the positioning of United 
        States military personnel;
Whereas the Department of Defense is moving rapidly to implement these 
        recommendations;
Whereas the communities near military installations that are slated to receive 
        major troop increases have already invested time and capital in making 
        preparations for upcoming increases in population; and
Whereas funding these recommendations on an annual basis is absolutely necessary 
        for their implementation and the economic confidence of the communities 
        that are expecting increases in population: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that Congress should not include 
provisions that provoke veto threats from the President in bills that 
appropriate funds for the implementation of recommendations of the Base 
Closure and Realignment Commission.
                                 <all>
```
6ft. 'P/J~P}J~ &~ 

f{J})~o/Pl>uMo ow~ 

David E. Peralta 

Parish President 

1125 E. St. Bernard Highway 

Phone (504) 278-4300 

February 11, 2013 

U.S. Dept. of Transportation 

Docket Mamagement Systems 

400 7th St. SW, Room PL-4090 

Washington, DC 20591-0001 

Dear Sir: 

Chalmette, Louisiana 70043 

Fax (504) 278-4480 

(.,'l 

L·J 

......J 

..._ -·-· 

' 

~~;.r·-{ '-,_."' ~ 

n 1:..,-" .. 1 -·· ___ .... '1;._ _.; 

>~=-·.:~ 

~~:::?8 

This letter is a follow up to my letter of January 30, 

2013 requesting to extend the Exemption No. 10161 Regulatory 

No. FAA-2005-0001, dated May 16, 2011, which will expire May 

31, 2013 for St. Bernard Mosquito Control, St. Bernard Parish 

Government, 8201 West Judge Preez Drive, Chalmettwe, LA. 70043. 

Proposed Action: Load aircraft to max. of single operational 

gross weight in place of the rule to load aircraft to MAX. gross 

take off weight and have a jettisoning device to jettison 

chemical load. This exemption from Section 14 CFR 137.53(c)(2) 

will increase the level of public safety beyond the level of 

safety required by the rule CFR 137.53(c)(2). 

The aircraft is the same BN2A-26 s/n 883 N706MS as the 

origional exemption. This exemption will insure the exit from 

the congested area to a safe landing, with out the release of 

chemical into the congested area. This will protect persons, 

property and the enviroment from large volumes of unsprayed 

chemical and increase the safety of the flight crew. 

This exemption is to be used for the use of the above list 

aircraft ONLY. Placards are installed on the chemical tank with 

the MAX Single engine gross load in U.S. pounds. The tank liquid 

capicity is designed to co~tain only the gallons of the chemical 

to the pounds listed on the placard to prevent over load. 

~~~~·#4--· Augd{t J. Blake 

Agent of Service 

St. Bernard Mosquito Control 
rf/t. PIJ~ PJJ~ 8!~ ~~o{PJ>edk Off/~ 

David E. Peralta 

Parish President . 

1125 E. St. Bernard Highway 

Phone (504) 278-4300 

January 30, 2013 

u.s. Dept. of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

400 7th St. SW, Room PL-4090 

Washington, DC 20591-0001 

Dear Sir: 

Chalmette, Louisiana 70043 

Fax (504) 278-4480 

This letter is to request to extend Exemption No. 10161 

Regulatory No. FAA-2005-20297, dated May 16, 2011, which will 

expire May 31, 2013, for St. Bernard Mosquito Control, St. 

Bernard Parish Government, 8201 West Judge Perez Drive, 

c~~:f7~ 

A~;~~ ;_· Bla~e · 

Agent of Service 

St. Bernard Parish Mosquito Control
§ 1919.70 General provisions. ( a ) Certification of shore-based material handling devices shall conform to the requirements contained in this subpart, except in cases for which exemptions or variations have been granted by the Assistant Secretary as provided in §§ 1919.50(d) and 1919.60(a).
( b ) Any replacements or repairs deemed necessary by the accredited person shall be carried out before application of a proof test.
( c ) *Ton* in this subpart means a ton of 2,000 pounds.
( d ) When applied to shore-based material handling devices, ratings may be stated in pounds rather than tons. When stated in tons of 2,000 pounds, this fact shall be indicated.
# Euroopa Liidu C 205A/13.

| | ISSN 1725-5171 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 205A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 47. köide13. august 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5171

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 205A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

47. köide13. august 2004

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Teatised |
| | Intelligentse Energia Täidesaatev Agentuur |
| 2004/C 205A/1 | Kutse taotluste esitamiseks | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

III   Teatised

Intelligentse Energia Täidesaatev Agentuur

2004/C 205A/1

Kutse taotluste esitamiseks

1

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

III Teatised

Intelligentse Energia Täidesaatev Agentuur

| 13.8.2004 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 205/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2004

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 205/1

---

KUTSE TAOTLUSTE ESITAMISEKS

(2004/C 205 A/01)

Intelligentse Energia Täidesaatev Agentuur otsib kandidaate teatud ametikohtade täitmiseks. Detailsem informatsioon agentuuri ülesannete, vabade ametikohtade ja taotluste vormistamise reeglite kohta on esitatud agentuuri internetiaadressil: http://europa.eu.int/comm/energy/intelligent/index_en.html.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6045

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DONTE ROLANDO HARRIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District

Judge. (1:02-cr-00381-WDQ; 1:06-cv-03080-WMN)

Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: March 5, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donte Rolando Harris, Appellant Pro Se. James G. Warwick, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Donte Rolando Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s

order construing his pleading as a successive motion filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Harris has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 2204.402 Answer to application. ( a ) Within 30 days after service of an application, the Secretary shall file an answer to the application. Unless the Secretary requests an extension of time for filing or files a statement of intent to negotiate under paragraph (b) of this section, failure to file an answer within the 30-day period may be treated as a consent to the award requested.
( b ) If the Secretary and the applicant believe that the issues in the fee application can be settled, they may jointly file a statement of their intent to negotiate a settlement. The filing of this statement shall extend the time for filing an answer for an additional 30 days, and further extensions may be granted by the judge upon request.
( c ) The answer shall explain in detail any objections to the award requested and identify the facts relied on in support of the Secretary's position. If the answer is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, the Secretary shall include with the answer either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 2204.405.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 920 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 920

 To provide wage parity for certain prevailing rate employees in Rhode 
                                Island.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 20, 2007

  Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Whitehouse) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide wage parity for certain prevailing rate employees in Rhode 
                                Island.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rhode Island Federal Worker Fairness 
Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. WAGE PARITY FOR CERTAIN PREVAILING RATE EMPLOYEES IN RHODE 
              ISLAND.

    The wage schedules and rates applicable to prevailing rate 
employees (as defined in section 5342 of title 5, United States Code) 
in the Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, wage area shall be the same as 
the wage schedules and rates applicable to prevailing rate employees in 
the Boston, Massachusetts, wage area.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    Section 2 shall take effect beginning with the first pay period 
beginning on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.34B
                         KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

                       AMENDMENTS DATED DECEMBER 17, 2002
                                     TO THE
                           401K INCENTIVE SAVINGS PLAN
                        FOR SALARIED AND HOURLY EMPLOYEES


1.  The Entry Date for employee deferrals is changed from "January 1 and July 1
    of each year, after six months of employment," to "three months of
    employment" and to "the first day of each month."

2.  The maximum deferral is raised from 15% to 60%.

3.  The Contact Name is changed from "James J. Rossi," to "Administrator."

4.  Change to reflect severance pay is excluded from monies to be considered in
    any Company match.

5.  The frequency for changing the percent deferred is changed from once a year
    to monthly, on a prospective basis.

6.  Clarify that "qualified non-elective Employer Contributions shall be
    allocated to participants as a percentage of the lowest paid participants."

7.  Change to allow in-bound rollovers of after-tax money from other qualified
    plans.

8.  For hardship withdrawals, the minimum amount is changed to $500, down from
    $1,000.

9.  The coverage or eligibility requirement is changed from age 21 to 20.

10. Change to allow automated enrollments and educational services at no
    additional charge to the Company.

11. Change participant loans, after-tax withdrawals, and normal distributions
    due to terminations and/or retirements from sponsor (Kewaunee) approved
    transactions to pre-approved transactions.

12. Fidelity will restate the plan Documents and the Adoption Agreement to
    reflect the above changes, as well as certain deminimis administrative
    changes and/or GUST changes previously approved.

All the amendments  would be effective as of January 1, 2003,  except those that
are affected by the elimination of the annuities distribution  amendment,  which
would be effective on February 10, 2003.
#### John Mathews *against*Thomas Ferguson.

ON CERTIORARI.

Justice has action1 licious cution. (a)

L. Q. C. Elmer, attorney.

(a)

*Potts vs. Imlay, 1 South. 330 (a).*

Southard J.

There is no cause of reversal. It is an for *malicious prosecution*commenced by warrant; the state of demand is technically drawn, containjng every thing requisite in such a case; and as there were several witnesses sworn, it is to be presumed that the demand was supported by proof. Of such a cause the justice had jurisdiction, and there seems no error in the proceedings.

Judgment affirmed.