alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
INTERDENT, INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999 AND 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,790                   8,244
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,934                  16,309
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,969                   2,887
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,206                  30,604
<PP&E>                                          22,700                  21,379
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 177,824                 165,134
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,664                  23,895
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,106                   2,102
<PREFERRED>                                     12,090                  12,091
<COMMON>                                        32,740                  32,551
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,591                  24,348
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   177,824                 165,134
<SALES>                                         51,378                  23,276
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,378                  23,276
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,557                  22,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (22)                      18
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,351                     195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (508)                     848
<INCOME-TAX>                                       191                     322
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (699)                     526
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)                     .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)                     .03
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit  99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Starberrys Corporation on Form 10-QSB
for  the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ralph Brier, Chief Executive
Officer,  President  and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge  and  belief:

     (1)  the  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.




                                       /s/ "Ralph Brier"
                                       -----------------
                                          Ralph Brier
                    Chief  Executive  Officer,  President  and  Director

Date:
----

----

III Oplysninger

Det Europæiske Forsvarsagentur

----

STILLINGSOPSLAG

(2004/C 220 A/01)

Det Europæiske Forsvarsagentur ønsker at besætte følgende stillinger:

Yderligere oplysninger (på engelsk) samt ansøgningsskema kan fås via Rådets websted http://ue.eu.int (kontakt/ledige stillinger).

Ansøgningsfrist: den 1. oktober 2004, idet poststemplet er afgørende.

----
#### WINTERS v INDEMNITY INSURANCE CO OF N AMERICA

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist, Lucas Co

No 2281.

Decided Feb. 3, 1930

S. N. Young, Toledo, for Winters.

Tracy, Chapman & Welles, Toledo for Ins Co.

RICHARDS, J;

The fact that the entire poicy is attached to the petition and marked as an exhibit, does not permit the court to examine or construe it in passing upon a demurrer to the petition.

Sobocinski vs. Beczkowski, 18 Court of Appeals Opinion, 6th District, unreported n. 181.

As we read the provisions of clause 9, set forth in the petition, the obligation of the defendant under that clause in the event of total and permanent loss of vision was to pay a sum equal to the weekly indemnity for 150 weeks. The petition avers that the defendant did pay to the plaintiff the weekly benefits provided by that clause for the period of one year, which would be 52 weeks, and that the company thereafter paid to the plaintiff in a lump sum the stipulated sum provided in the policy for a period of 98 weeks, thus making it apparent that the company has already paid to the plaintiff the payments provided for by clause 9.

If the defendant paid the stipulated amounts for 52 weeks before they were really due and payable, that certainly would not be to the disadvantage of the plaintiff, and the plaintiff having accepted the same and subsequently accepted the payment covering the remaining 98 weeks —the balance of the 150 — which the company by the provisions of clause 9 was bound to pay, the court is unable to see that he has any further claim so far as is shown by the averments of the petition.

For this reason the judgment is affirmed.

Williams and Lloyd, JJ., concur.
§ 2200.61 Submission without hearing. ( a ) A case may be fully stipulated by the parties and submitted to the Commission or the Judge for a decision at any time. The stipulation of facts shall be in writing and signed by the parties or their representatives. The submission of a case under this rule does not alter the burden of proof, the requirements otherwise applicable with respect to adducing proof, or the effect of failure of proof.
( b ) Motions for summary judgment are governed by § 2200.40(j).
[Cite as State ex rel. Berlingeri, 2014-Ohio-406.]

Court of Appeals of Ohio

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION 

No. 100671

STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. 

DOMINIC BERLINGERI

RELATOR 

vs. 

JUDGE BRIAN J. CORRIGAN

RESPONDENT 

JUDGMENT: 

WRIT DENIED

Writ of Procedendo 

Motion No. 470804 

Order No. 471571 

RELEASE DATE: February 4, 2014 
FOR RELATOR

Dominic Berlingeri, Jr. 

Inmate No. A 583-358 

Allen Correctional Institution 

Attn: Unit C 

2338 North West Street 

Lima, OH 45801 

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT

Timothy J. McGinty 

Cuyahoga County Prosecutor 

BY: James E. Moss 

Assistant Prosecuting Attorney 

The Justice Center 

1200 Ontario Street 

Cleveland, OH 44113
SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J.: 

{¶1} On November 26, 2013, relator Dominic Berlingeri commenced this 

procedendo action against Judge Brian Corrigan to compel him to rule on his petition to 

vacate allied offenses of similar import in State v. Berlingeri, Cuyahoga C.P. No. 

CR-527719-G, which was filed on March 29, 2013. On December 18, 2013, respondent 

judge filed a motion for summary judgment, which Berlingeri has not opposed. The 

motion for summary judgment is granted, and the petition is denied for the reasons that 

follow. 

{¶2} Attached to the motion for summary judgment is a copy of a journal entry that 

indicates that on December 17, 2013, Judge Corrigan denied Berlingeri’s petition to 

vacate allied offenses of similar import, rendering the petition for a writ of procedendo 

moot. State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman, 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163 (1983); State ex 

rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 658 

N.E.2d 723 (1996). Additionally, the petition does not comply with Loc.App.R. 

45(B)(1)(a), which is a separate ground that warrants dismissal. State ex rel. Fuller v. 

Friedland, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 76750, 1999 Ohio App. LEXIS 4856 (Oct. 14, 1999), 

citing State ex rel. Sherrills v. Court of Common Pleas, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 69707 

(Dec. 1, 1995) (“failure to provide this court with a supporting affidavit warrants 

dismissal”). 
{¶3} Accordingly, we grant the respondent’s unopposed motion for summary 

judgment. Respondent to bear costs, but costs are waived. It is further ordered that the 

clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and date of entry pursuant to 

Civ.R. 58(B). 

{¶4} Writ denied. 

SEAN C. GALLAGHER, JUDGE 

MARY J. BOYLE, A.J., and 

KENNETH A. ROCCO, J., CONCUR
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-11-0000748 28-JUN-2013 08:43 AM
#### § 2584.8477(e)-7 Effective date.

This section is effective December 29, 1988, and liability for any transaction which occurs on or after this date will be governed by this section only. In accordance with section 114(a) of Pub. L. 99-556, the interim regulations promulgated by the Board appearing at title 5, CFR, chapter VI, §§ 1660.1 through 1660.5 will no longer be effective as of December 29, 1988. Liability for transactions which occur before the effective date of this regulation, however, will continue to be governed by allocations made both during the statutorily defined effective period of the previously cited interim regulations and pursuant to the requirements of those regulations.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, David F. Hoffmeister, Chief Financial Officer of Invitrogen Corporation (the
Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                          |  |                                             
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|Dated: November 9, 2006 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ David F. Hoffmeister
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                          |  | David F. Hoffmeister Chief Financial
Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Invitrogen and will be retained by Invitrogen and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 1989.113 Judicial enforcement.

Whenever any person has failed to comply with a preliminary order of reinstatement or a final order issued under TFA, including one approving a settlement agreement, the Secretary may file a civil action seeking enforcement of the order in the United States district court for the district in which the violation was found to have occurred. Whenever any person has failed to comply with a preliminary order of reinstatement or a final order issued under TFA, including one approving a settlement agreement, a person on whose behalf the order was issued may file a civil action seeking enforcement of the order in the appropriate United States district court.
#### § 31.11 Judicial review.

Action taken pursuant to section 602 of the Act is subject to judicial review as provided in section 603 of the Act.

[29 FR 16284, Dec. 4, 1964. Redesignated at 38 FR 17958, July 5, 1973]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                          9,636
<SECURITIES>                                   26,215
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               36,818
<PP&E>                                         30,283
<DEPRECIATION>                                 25,370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 46,306
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           9,360
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           20
<OTHER-SE>                                     22,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   46,306
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  125
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                8,478
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,141)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,141)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,141)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                    Ending
Class            Interest             Principal    Losses           Balance
<S>               <C>                  <C>            <C>           <C>
A1                    2794373.88         25477065                0       526952697.59
A2                       1007500                0                0          200000000
A3                       1716000                0                0          330000000
A4                       1437750                0                0          270000000
A5                     1097416.2                0                0          192670000
A6                        967500                0                0          180000000
A7                    2457083.71      15161625.34                0       515427695.02
A8                       1000000                0                0          200000000
MBIA                      306960                0                0                  0
R1                             0                0                0                  0
R2                             0                0                0                  0
XIO                   1377854.75                0                0                  0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33531-33532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13012]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-285-000]


Northwest Alaskan Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

May 18, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 15, 2000 Northwest Alaskan Pipeline Company 
(Northwest Alaskan) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Original Volume No. 2, Forty-Eighth Revised Sheet No. 5, 
proposed to be effective July 1, 2000.
    Northwest Alaskan states that the instant filing is submitted 
pursuant to Section 4 of the Natural Gas Act, Section 9 of the Alaskan 
Natural Gas Transportation Act of 1976 and Part 154 of the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission's Regulations. Northwest Alaskan is 
submitting this filing pursuant to the provisions of the amended 
purchase agreements between Northwest Alaskan and Pan-Alberta Gas 
(U.S.), Inc. (PAG-US), and pursuant to Rate Schedules X-1, X-2, and X-
3, which provide for Northwest Alaskan to file 45 days prior to the 
commencement of the next demand charge period (July 1, 2000 through 
December 31, 2000) the demand charges and demand charge adjustments 
which Northwest Alaskan will charge during the period.
    Northwest Alaskan states that included in Appendix B attached to 
the filing are the workpapers supporting the derivation of the revised 
demand charge adjustment reflected on the tariff sheet included 
therein.
    Northwest Alaskan states that it is serving copies of the instant 
filing to its affected customers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the

[[Page 33532]]

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of 
the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests 
must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-13012 Filed 5-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 966 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 966

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To enable the Department of State to respond to a critical shortage of 
         passport processing personnel, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Passport Backlog Reduction Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. REEMPLOYMENT OF FOREIGN SERVICE ANNUITANTS.

    Section 824(g) of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 (22 U.S.C. 
4064(g)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``; or'' and 
                inserting a semicolon;
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting ``; or''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new 
                subparagraph--
            ``(C)(i) to provide assistance to consular posts with a 
        substantial backlog of visa applications; or
            ``(ii) to provide assistance to meet the demand resulting 
        from the passport and travel document requirements set forth in 
        section 7209(b) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism 
        Prevention Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-458; 8 U.S.C. 1185 
        note).'';
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new 
        paragraph:
    ``(3) The authority of the Secretary to waive the application of 
subsections (a) through (d) for an annuitant pursuant to paragraph 
(1)(C) shall terminate on September 30, 2010.''.

            Passed the Senate June 29, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 966

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To enable the Department of State to respond to a critical shortage of 
         passport processing personnel, and for other purposes.
```
eaui_ex1030.htm


Exhibit 10.30


 



SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED


$358,527 LOAN AGREEMENT







This Second Amended and Restated $358,527 Loan Agreement (“Second Amendment”) is made and entered into this _27_ day of March, 2015 by EAU Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Peter Ullrich, a resident of Florida (“Holder”).







BACKGROUND







WHEREAS, Company and Holder executed and delivered that certain Amended and Restated $358,527 Loan Agreement, dated April 4, 2014, in the original principal amount of $358,527 (the “Original Note”);







WHEREAS, Company and Holder executed and delivered that certain $358,527 Loan Agreement, dated December 31, 2011, in the original principal amount of $358,527;







WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder desire to execute and deliver this Second Amendment to the Original Note.







NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Holder do hereby agree as follows:







1.           Section 4(a) of the Original Note is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following is hereby inserted in its place:







Maturity Date.  The Company shall pay the principal amount outstanding hereunder together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon and any other amounts payable to Holder in respect of this Note on the earlier of (i) November 30, 2015, or (ii) the acceleration of the maturity of this Note by Holder pursuant to Section (6)(b)(i), (the earlier of such dates, the “Maturity Date”), unless otherwise converted into Common Stock in accordance with Section 5.







2.           Except as expressly set forth herein, the Original Note shall remain unchanged and unmodified and in full force and effect.







3.           All capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Original Note.


 


4.           This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto were in the same instrument.


 


[Remainder of page intentionally left blank.  Signatures on following page.]


 




  





1











  






 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment under seal on the date first above written.


 





	 	Company:	 
	 	 	 
	 	EAU TECHNOLOGIES, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
  

	
By: 

	/s/ Douglas W. Kindred	 
	 	 	Douglas W. Kindred	 
	 	 	Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	Holder:	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	Peter F. Ullrich	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	

By: 

	/s/ Peter F. Ullrich	 
	 	 	Peter F. Ullrich	 
	 	 	 	 














2