alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Amtsblatt C 205A/13.

| | ISSN 1725-2407 |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 205A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 47. Jahrgang13. August 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2407

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 205A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

47. Jahrgang13. August 2004

---

| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Bekanntmachungen |
| | Exekutivagentur für intelligente Energie |
| 2004/C 205A/1 | Aufruf zur Einreichung von Bewerbungen | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

III   Bekanntmachungen

Exekutivagentur für intelligente Energie

2004/C 205A/1

Aufruf zur Einreichung von Bewerbungen

1

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

III Bekanntmachungen

Exekutivagentur für intelligente Energie

| 13.8.2004 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 205/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2004

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 205/1

---

AUFRUF ZUR EINREICHUNG VON BEWERBUNGEN

(2004/C 205 A/01)

Die Exekutivagentur für intelligente Energie sucht Kandidaten/Kandidatinnen zur Besetzung einer Anzahl von freien Stellen. Detaillierte Informationen zu den betreffenden Stellen, den Aufgaben der Agentur und den Bewerbungsverfahren sind auf der Internetseite der Agentur unter der folgenden Adresse veröffentlicht: http://europa.eu.int/comm/energy/intelligent/index_en.html.

---
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 I, Thomas
Flottmann, Chief Executive Officer of Manas Petroleum Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 (1)           the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30,
2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:  November
14, 2008
 
 
 /s/ Thomas
Flottmann_
 Thomas
Flottmann
 Chief
Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-KSB/A, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about
May 14, 1998, of our report, dated March 11, 1998, on our audits of the 
consolidated financial statements of United Leisure Corporation and 
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996.


                              /s/ Hollander, Lumer & Co. LLP
                                  (a successor to the firm of
                                  Hollander, Gilbert & Co.)

Los Angeles, California
May 14, 1998
#### § 2580.412-25 Exemption.

An exemption from the bonding requirements of subsection 13(a) of the Welfare and Pension Plans Disclosure Act is granted by this section whereby arrangements (which otherwise comply with the requirements of section 13 of the Act and the regulations issued thereunder), with the Underwriters at Lloyds, London will satisfy the bonding requirements of the Act.
Exhibit
      32.1




Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer of




HORIZON
      BANCORPORATION, INC.




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(Adopted
      by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




The
      undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc., hereby
      certifies that:




|1. | Horizon
              Bancorporation, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
              ended September 30, 2007, to which this certification is attached as
              an
              exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section
              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
              and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Horizon
              Bancorporation, Inc.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









/s/
      Charles S. Conoley


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


November
      14, 2007
AVS

Quality Management

System

Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with 58

QPM#

AIR-ANM-030-F7

Date: December 17, 2008

Revision

1

Record of Contacts

FDMS Docket No. FAA-~261o-0 lf30

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Person Contacted Date

ATA Joe White 4/13/2010

Boeing Fritz Socdcl 4/12/2010

Boeing Todll Esselst)'" 4/1112010

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check the Master List to Verify That This is the Correct Revision Before Use
§ 36.505 Employment criteria. A recipient shall not administer or operate any test or other criterion for any employment opportunity that has a disproportionately adverse effect on persons on the basis of sex unless: ( a ) Use of such test or other criterion is shown to predict validly successful performance in the position in question; and
( b ) Alternative tests or criteria for such purpose, which do not have such disproportionately adverse effect, are shown to be unavailable.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6416

LARRY WILLIAMS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN KELLY; JAMES SAVGE; DOC DEEZIEN; PAM C. KELLY; SUSAN THOMAS JAMES; AL GREEN; S. QUE; PAT BARFIELD; JOE HARRIS , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Orangeburg

. Mary G. Lewis , District Judge. ( 5:22

- cv - 00004

- MGL )

Submitted : June 22, 2023 Decided: June 27, 2023

Before HARRIS and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Larry Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6416 Doc: 17 Filed: 06/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Larry Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Williams’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court ’s order

. Williams v. Kelly , No. 5:22

- cv - 00004

- MGL (D.S.C. Apr. 12, 2023) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid th e decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6416 Doc: 17 Filed: 06/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
(79 South. 878)

#### FUQUA v. SOUTHERN RY. CO.

(6 Div. 436.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 7, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; John H. Miller, Judge. Action by R. L. Fuqua against the Southern Railway Company. From judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

Allen, Bell & Sadler, of Birmingham, for appellant. Stokely, Serivner & Dominick, of Birmingham, for appellee.

BRIOKENj_ J.

Reversed and remanded, on authority of Fuqua v. Southern Railway Co., 201 Ala. 164, 77 South. 690. Reversed and remanded.
# EUR-Lex - 31998R1058 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998R1058

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/98 of 20 May 1998 determining to what extent applications for import rights lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 546/98 can be met as regards the tariff quota for certain beef and veal sector products originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia **

*
Official Journal L 151 , 21/05/1998 P. 0027 - 0027 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1058/98 of 20 May 1998 determining to what extent applications for import rights lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 546/98 can be met as regards the tariff quota for certain beef and veal sector products originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 546/98 of 10 March 1998 laying down detailed rules for the application in 1998 of the arrangements applicable to imports laid down in Council Decision 97/831/EC as regards certain beef and veal products (1), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 853/98 (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 546/98 fixes the quantity of certain beef and veal products originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia that can be imported under special terms in 1998;

Whereas Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 546/98 stipulates that the quantities applied for may be reduced; whereas the quantities applied for exceed the quantities available; whereas, under the circumstances and with a view to ensuring an equitable shareout of the available quantities, the quantities applied for should be reduced on a proportional basis,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

All applications for import rights lodged pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 546/98 shall be met to the extent of 0,4056 % of the quantity applied for.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 May 1998.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 May 1998.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 72, 11. 3. 1998, p. 8.

(2) OJ L 122, 24. 4. 1998, p. 6.
EXHIBIT 10.3


 


AMENDMENT
TO employment agreement


 


THIS AMENDMENT TO
THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT DATED APRIL 1, 2014 is made and entered into as of January 1, 2015, by and between MassRoots, Inc. (the
“Company”), and Tyler Knight (the “Employee”).


 


R E C I T A L S


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and Employee entered into an Amended Employment Agreement on April 1, 2014.


 


WHEREAS, the Company
has determined the Employee has routinely exceeded key performance metrics in his area of operations.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
be it resolved that Section 5 (a) of the Employment Agreement dated April 1, 2014 to be amended to state:


 


(a) Employee shall receive an annual salary of sixty
thousand dollars ($60,000) (“Base Salary”) paid in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices.
The Company may make such deductions, withholdings or payments from sums payable to Employee hereunder which are required by
law for taxes and similar charges. The Company will review Employee’s base salary in accordance with the
Company’s normal payroll procedures.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Employee and the Company have executed this Employment Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


 


	 	
        By:/s/ Isaac Dietrich

        

        Name: Isaac Dietrich

Title: Chairman and CEO

	 	 
	 	 
	 	By:/s/ Tyler Knight
	 	Employee Signature
#### S. S. Prentiss *vs.*W. P. Mellen, Administrator.

It is error to take judgment against a party to a suit, who has not been served ’ with process, and for whom no special appearance has been entered.

This case is brought by writ of error, from the Madison circuit court.

The abstract of Mr. Smedes sufficiently states the case.

*W. C.*Smedes, for plaintiff in error.

The declaration in assumpsit, is filed under the law of 1837, authorizing joint suits.

The writ, directed to the sheriff of Madison, is returned, “ not found.”

The writ to Hinds, is executed upon the defendant, A. G. McNutt.

The writ to Warren, is not returned at all.

A. G. McNutt plead non assumpsit.

The plaintiff entered a discontinuance as to the defendants, Dawson and McNutt, and took judgment by default, against Prentiss.

Mr. Prentiss had not been served with process, and had entered no special appearance: he was not before the court below when the judgment was rendered, and, therefore, no party to the suit. With what propriety judgment was rendered against him we cannot perceive, and we presume this court will not hesitate to set it aside.

Mr. Justice Thacher

delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit was instituted in the circuit court of Madison county, at its April term, A. D. 1838, by William P. Mellen, administrator, &c., of James Patterson, deceased, against Joseph Dawson, Seargent S. Prentiss, and Alexander G. McNutt. A *capias ad respondendum*was issued against all the defendants, directed *522to the sheriff of Madison county, and returnable at the term aforesaid, with orders not to be executed upon the defendants, Prentiss and McNutt, which was returned by the sheriff, *non est inventus,*&c. A duplicate *capias ad respondendum*was issued against all the defendants, directed to the sheriff of Hinds county, and returnable at the term aforesaid, with orders not to be executed upon the defendants, Prentiss and Dawson, which was returned by the said sheriff, “ executed,” &.c.

The defendant, McNutt, by attorney, plead non assumpsit to the action.

The cause being called, the plaintiff discontinued his action as to the defendant, McNutt, and' the court below gave judgment by default, against the plaintiff in error, Prentiss.

It is assigned for error, that the defendant be'low, Prentiss, was not served with process, and that no special appearance was entered by or for him. The record nowhere shows him to have been before the court at the time judgment by default was taken against him. This is manifestly error.

*Judgment below must be reversed and the cause remanded.*
March 23, 2011

Attachment to Form “ Documentat ion of OMB Review Under Executive Order 12886 ” Note to the File FROM: Kathleen Franklin, USEPA/OSWER/OEM

Regarding Proposed Rule for EHS TPQ Solids in Solution

- Changes from OMB Review [ E mergency Planning and Community Right - to - Know Act; Amendments to Emergency Planning and Notification; Emergency Planning and List of Extremely Hazardous Substances and Threshold Planning Quantities. PA - HQ - SFUND - 2010 - 0586 ; FRL_XXXX - X ] RIN 2050 - AF08 Docket Number EPA

- HQ

- SFUND

- 2010

- 0586 All changes in the redline/strikeout version of the rule that was reviewed by ORIA/OMB are due to suggestions or recommendations of ORIA, except as noted below: 1. Last paragraph on bottom of page 10 and continuing on one line on page 11

- This was added by EPA when errors in EHS list in CFR was discovered. 2. EPA did not delete the third and fourth sentences under paragraph A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review on page 43 as ORIA suggeste d because EPA ’ s requirements for the template language in this section allows some explanation for the impact of the regulation.
§ 2203.7 Transcripts, recordings and minutes of closed meetings. ( a ) *Record of meeting.* The Commission will make a complete transcript or electronic recording adequate to record fully the proceedings of each meeting, or portion of a meeting, closed to the public. However, if all or part of a meeting is closed under paragraph (b)(8), (9)(i) or (10) of § 2203.3, the Commission shall maintain either such a transcript or recording, or a set of minutes. Such minutes will fully and clearly describe all matters discussed and will provide a full and accurate summary of any actions taken, and the reasons for the actions. The minutes will also include a description of each of the views expressed on any item and a record of any roll call vote (reflecting the vote of each Commissioner on the question). In addition, the minutes will identify all documents considered in connection with any action.
( b ) *Public access to records.* The Commission will make promptly available to the public, at its national office, the transcript, electronic recording, or minutes of the discussion of any item on the agenda, or of any testimony of any witness received at the meeting, except for such item or items of such discussion or testimony as the Commission determines to contain information which may be withheld under § 2203.3(b). Copies of the transcript, the minutes, or a transcription of the recording disclosing the identity of each speaker, with the deletions noted in the preceding sentence, will be furnished to any person at the actual cost of duplication or transcription. Requests to inspect or to have copies made of any transcript, electronic recording or set of minutes of any meeting, or any item(s) on the agenda of any meeting, should be made in writing to the General Counsel at the Office of the General Counsel, Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, Room 941, One Lafayette Centre, 1120-20th Street NW., Washington, DC 20036-3457. The request should identify the time, date, and place of the meeting and briefly describe the items sought. The Commission will maintain a complete verbatim copy of the transcript, a complete copy of the minutes, or a complete electronic recording of each closed meeting, or closed portion of a meeting, for a period of at least two years after the meeting, or until one year after the conclusion of any Commission proceeding with respect to which all or part of the meeting was held, whichever occurs later.
[50 FR 51679, Dec. 19, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 26066, Apr. 30, 1993; 73 FR 56492, Sept. 29, 2008]
#### Zapf *v.*The State.

[No. 17,772.

Filed June 19, 1896.]

From the Marion Criminal Court.

*Affirmed.*

*Baker & Daniels, Elliott & Elliott, Stuart Bros. & Hammond, Zollars & Worden, Lamb & Beasley,*and *S. R. Hamill,*for appellant.

*W. A. Ketcham,*Attorney-General, *C. S. Wiltsie, F. E. Matson, E. F. Ritter,*and *Duncan, Smith*& *Hornbrook,*for State.

Jordan, J.

— The appellant was convicted upon an indictment which charged that on the 4th day of July, 1895, he being duly licensed under the laws of this State to sell intoxicating liquors, did then and there unlawfully suffer and permit in his saloon certain persons named, who were not members of his family. This prosecution was based upon section 3 of an Act approved March 11, 1895, (Acts of 1895, p. 248).

The questions herein presented were considered and decided adversely to appellant in the case of *The State*v. *Gerhardt, ante,*439, and upon the authority of that decision the judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.
#### § 4000.4 Where do I file my submission?

To find out where to send your submission, visit our Web site at *http://www.pbgc.gov,* see the instructions to our forms, or call our Customer Service Center (1-800-400-7242 for participants, or 1-800-736-2444 for practitioners; If you are deaf or hard of hearing or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.) Because we have different addresses for different types of filings, you should make sure to use the appropriate address for your type of filing. For example, some filings (such as premium payments) must be sent to a specified bank, while other filings (such as the Standard Termination Notice (Form 500)) must be sent to the appropriate department at our offices in Washington, DC. You do not have to address electronic submissions made through our Web site. We are responsible for ensuring that such submissions go to the proper place.

[68 FR 61347, Oct. 28, 2003, as amended at 70 FR 11543, Mar. 9, 2005; 88 FR 76664, Nov. 7, 2023]
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                           PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      I,  Albert H.  Pleus,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2003,  that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of a21,  Inc.  for the quarter  ended March 31, 2004 fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition
and results of operations of a21, Inc.


      I, Haim Ariav, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of a21, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that  information  contained in such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of a21, Inc.


By: /s/ Albert H. Pleus
   --------------------
   Albert H. Pleus
   Chairman and Principal Financial Officer


By: /s/ Haim Ariav
   ---------------
   Haim Ariav
   President and Principal Executive Officer


Date: May 24, 2004
(75 South. 1005)

#### BYARS v. STATE.

(8 Div. 469.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 8, 1917.)

Appeal from Law and Equity Court, Morgan County; Thomas W. Wert, Judge. James Byars was convicted of crime, and appeals.

Affirmed.

C. L. Price, of Albany, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and P. W. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

BROWN, P. J.

The questions presented on this appeal were all considered in the following cases and determined against the appellant’s contention: White v. State, 15 Ala. App. 197, 72 South. 771; Ex parte Brown, 15 Ala. App. 210, 72 South. 772; Ogles v. State, 15 Ala. App. 111, 72 South. 598. Affirmed.
Key Dates for the Health 

Insurance Marketplace

Get ready for Open Enrollment – mark key dates on your calendar and 

follow the tips below.

4 Key Dates

n November 1, 2018: Open Enrollment 

starts for 2019.

n December 15, 2018: Open 

Enrollment ends. 

n December 31, 2018: Coverage 

ends for 2018 Marketplace plans.

n January 1, 2019: Coverage can 

begin for 2019 Marketplace plans.

Visit HealthCare.gov

n Sign up to get emails or texts with 

the latest news and reminders of 

important dates.

n If you have Marketplace coverage 

now, review your application at 

HealthCare.gov to make sure it’s 

up-to-date and report any life 

changes.

n If you don’t have Marketplace 

coverage now, create an account 

and see what coverage or help with 

costs you may qualify for.

n Apply and enroll in health coverage.

Paid for by the Department of Health & Human Services.

CMS Product No.11660

Revised June 2018