```

[Senate Report 115-444]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

 						   Calendar No. 735

115th Congress}                                            { Report
                                 SENATE
  2d Session  }                                            { 115-444

======================================================================
 
                     SUPPORT FOR RAPID INNOVATION 
                              ACT OF 2017

                               __________

                              R E P O R T

                                 OF THE

                   COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND

                          GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS

                          UNITED STATES SENATE

                              TO ACCOMPANY

                                 S. 278

         TO AMEND THE HOMELAND SECURITY ACT OF 2002 TO PROVIDE
    FOR INNOVATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES

[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

               December 19, 2018.--Ordered to be printed
       
       
                               __________
                                      
       
                    U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE                    
                            WASHINGTON : 2018  
       
       
       
    
       
       
       COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS

                    RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin, Chairman
ROB PORTMAN, Ohio                    CLAIRE McCASKILL, Missouri
RAND PAUL, Kentucky                  THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware
JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma             HEIDI HEITKAMP, North Dakota
MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming             GARY C. PETERS, Michigan
JOHN HOEVEN, North Dakota            MAGGIE HASSAN, New Hampshire
STEVE DAINES, Montana                KAMALA D. HARRIS, California
JON KYL, Arizona                     DOUG JONES, Alabama

                  Christopher R. Hixon, Staff Director
                Gabrielle D'Adamo Singer, Chief Counsel
          Michelle D. Woods, Senior Professional Staff Member
               Margaret E. Daum, Minority Staff Director
       Charles A. Moskowitz, Minority Senior Legislative Counsel
                 Subhasri Ramanathan, Minority Counsel
                     Laura W. Kilbride, Chief Clerk

    
 						   Calendar No. 735

115th Congress}                                            { Report
                                 SENATE
  2d Session  }                                            { 115-444

======================================================================     
                
                SUPPORT FOR RAPID INNOVATION ACT OF 2017

                                _______
                                

               December 19, 2018.--Ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

 Mr. Johnson, from the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
                    Affairs, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                         [To accompany S. 278]

      [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office]

    The Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
Affairs, to which was referred the bill (S. 278) to amend the 
Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide for innovative 
research and development, and for other purposes, having 
considered the same, reports favorably thereon with an 
amendment in the nature of a substitute and recommends that the 
bill, as amended, do pass.

                                CONTENTS

                                                                   Page
  I. Purpose and Summary..............................................1
 II. Background and the Need for Legislation..........................2
III. Legislative History..............................................4
 IV. Section-by-Section Analysis......................................4
  V. Evaluation of Regulatory Impact..................................5
 VI. Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate........................5
VII. Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported............5

                         I. Purpose and Summary

    The purpose of S. 278, the Support for Rapid Innovation Act 
of 2018, is to direct the Under Secretary of Science and 
Technology (S&T) to support the research, development, testing, 
and evaluation of cybersecurity technologies. It specifies the 
improvements, creations, and deployments that the research and 
development activities should produce for the components of the 
Department of Homeland Security (DHS or the Department). It 
requires coordination with non-Federal entities, the National 
Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD), the heads of other 
relevant Federal departments and agencies, and industry and 
academia.

              II. Background and the Need for Legislation

    S. 278 extends the authority of the DHS Under Secretary for 
S&T to support the research and development of innovative 
cybersecurity solutions. The Federal Government spends about 
$80 billion annually on information technology, including 
activities related to the operation and maintenance of outdated 
legacy information systems.\1\ Less than a quarter of this 
spending is related to efforts to modernize and develop new 
information systems.\2\ For instance, in May 2016, the 
Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported that Federal 
agencies are operating and maintaining information systems that 
``. . . are inefficient, ineffective, and increasingly 
obsolete, but federal spending on them has increased over the 
past 7 fiscal years from about $55 billion to about $63 
billion.''\3\ The Committee is concerned that the Federal 
Government's efforts to address security vulnerabilities by 
patching legacy information systems, rather than leveraging 
available technologies in the private sector, exposes Federal 
information systems and networks to increased cybersecurity 
risks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\Gov't Accountability Office, IT Acquisitions and Operations--
High Risk Issue https://www.gao.gov/key_issues/
it_acquisitions_operations/issue_summary#t=0 (last visited Nov. 9, 
2018).
    \2\Id.
    \3\Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    The effectiveness of the capabilities available to Federal 
agencies to detect, deter, and remediate malicious cyber 
intrusions on their information systems has been a longstanding 
concern of the Committee and oversight entities.\4\ In June 
2015, the Committee held a hearing entitled, Under Attack: 
Federal Cybersecurity and the Office of Personnel Management 
Data Breach, which examined cyber threats and vulnerabilities 
across Federal information systems and networks.\5\ 
Specifically, the hearing examined the Office of Personnel 
Management's plans to address security vulnerabilities in its 
systems that resulted in the theft of 4.1 million Federal 
employee's personnel records, including sensitive background 
data.\6\ During this hearing, Chairman Ron Johnson stated:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \4\Under Attack: Federal Cybersecurity and the OPM Data Breach: 
Hearing Before the S. Comm. On Homeland Sec. and Gov't Affairs, 114th 
Cong. (March 16, 2016), https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/hearings/under-
attack-federal-cybersecurity-and-the-opm-data-breach; Mitigating 
America's Cybersecurity Risk: Hearing Before the S. Comm. On Homeland 
Sec. and Gov't Affairs, 115th Cong. (Apr. 24, 2018), https://
www.hsgac.senate.gov/hearings/mitigating-americas-cybersecurity-risk.
    \5\Under Attack: Federal Cybersecurity and the OPM Data Breach: 
Hearing Before the S. Comm. On Homeland Sec. and Gov't Affairs, 114th 
Cong.
    \6\Id.

          Cybersecurity on federal agency networks has proved 
        to be grossly inadequate. Foreign actors, cyber 
        criminals and hacktivists are accessing our networks 
        with ease and impunity. While our defenses are 
        antiquated, our adversaries are by comparison proving 
        to be highly sophisticated. Meanwhile, agencies are 
        concentrating their resources trying to dictate 
        cybersecurity requirements for private companies, which 
        in many cases are implementing cybersecurity better and 
        more cheaply.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \7\Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    In February 2017 testimony before the Subcommittee on 
Research and Technology, Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology of the House of Representatives, Gregory Wilshusen 
of GAO stated that ``(c)yber-based intrusions and attacks on 
federal systems and systems supporting our nation's critical 
infrastructure, such as communications and financial services, 
are evolving and becoming more sophisticated.''\8\ However, in 
April 2018, the Committee held a hearing entitled, ``Mitigating 
America's Cybersecurity Risk'', Mr. Wilshusen stated that DHS 
has ``provided limited intrusion detection and prevention 
capabilities to entities across the federal government.''\9\ 
This statement was based on the findings of a January 2016 GAO 
report, which found that the DHS's National Cybersecurity 
Protection System (NCPS), operationally known as EINSTEIN, had 
limited capabilities for detections and preventing intrusions, 
conducting analytics, and sharing information.\10\ The GAO 
report further concluded that DHS had not taken actions 
necessary to ensure the successful mitigation of cybersecurity 
risks on Federal and private-sector computer systems and 
networks.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \8\Strengthening U.S. Cybersecurity Capabilities: Hearing Before H. 
Comm. on Science, Space, & Tech. Subcomm. On Research and Tech., 115th 
Cong. (Feb. 14, 2017) (testimony of Gregory C. Wilshusen, Dir., Info. 
Sec. Issues, Gov't Accountability Office), https://www.gao.gov/assets/
690/682756.pdf.
    \9\Mitigating America's Cybersecurity Risk: Hearing Before the S. 
Comm. On Homeland Sec. and Gov't Affairs, 115th Cong. (Apr. 24, 2018).
    \10\Gov't Accountability Office, GAO-16-294, Information Security: 
DHS Needs to Enhance Capabilities, Improve Planning, and Support 
Greater Adoption of Its National Cybersecurity Protection System (Jan. 
28, 2016).
    \11\Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Moreover, the Office of Management and Budget reported in 
its Annual Federal Information System Modernization Act Report 
to Congress for Fiscal Year 2017, that from January 2016 
through April 2017, DHS's NCPS detected about three percent of 
cyber incidents across Federal civilian networks via its 
EINSTEIN sensors.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \12\Letter from Suzette Kent, Fed. Chief Info. Officer, Office of 
e-Government and Info. Tech., Office of Mgmt. & Budget to The Honorable 
Johnson, Chairman, S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. & Governmental Affairs 
(Sept. 14, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    S. 278 supports DHS's role in improving the security of 
Federal information systems and networks and addressing 
cybersecurity gaps in public or private information systems and 
networks by authorizing the Department to leverage existing 
cybersecurity technologies in the private sector. Specifically, 
this bill aims to advance research and development projects 
that accelerate the deployment of more secure information 
systems, improves and creates technologies for detecting and 
preventing attacks or intrusions, and assist the development 
and support of cyber forensics and attack attribution 
capabilities.
    The bill also extends the Department's authority to conduct 
a research and development pilot program through September 30, 
2022, and includes a provision requiring an annual report to 
Congress on the projects developed and utilized under this 
section. Finally, the bill requires the Under Secretary for S&T 
to develop a training program for acquisitions staff that aims 
to prevent improper information access by authorized users. No 
additional funds are authorized to carry out the requirements 
of this bill.

                        III. Legislative History

    Senators Steve Daines (R-MT) and Mark R. Warner (D-VA) 
introduced S. 278 on February 2, 2017. The bill was referred to 
the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
    The Committee considered S. 278 at a business meeting on 
September 26, 2018. Senator Daines offered an amendment in the 
nature of a substitute that removed the requirement that the 
DHS Under Secretary for S&T support the review of source code 
that underpins critical information systems in coordination 
with non-Federal entities. The Committee adopted the amendment 
and ordered the bill, as amended, reported favorably, both by 
voice vote. Senators present for both the vote on the amendment 
and the vote on the underlying bill were: Johnson, Portman, 
Lankford, Enzi, Hoeven, McCaskill, Carper, Heitkamp, Peters, 
Hassan, Harris, and Jones.

        IV. Section-by-Section Analysis of the Bill, as Reported

Section 1. Short title

    This section provides the bill's short title, the ``Support 
for Rapid Innovation Act of 2018''.

Section 2. Cybersecurity research and development projects

    Subsection (a) amends Title III of the Homeland Security 
Act of 2002 by adding a new section entitled ``Cybersecurity 
Research and Development''.
    The new section requires the DHS Under Secretary for S&T to 
support the research, development, testing, evaluation, and 
transition of cybersecurity technologies. The supported 
research should use analytics and methodologies related to 
cybersecurity risks and incidents to improve the sharing of 
information and information security.
    The section also requires the Department's research and 
development activities to serve the components of DHS to 
advance the development and accelerate the deployment of more 
secure information systems and to assist in identifying and 
addressing unidentified or future cybersecurity threats. DHS's 
activities should serve to improve and create technologies for 
detecting and preventing attacks or intrusions, and create 
mitigation and recovery methodologies. The Department's 
research and development is required to assist the development 
and support of infrastructure and tools to support 
cybersecurity research and development efforts, technologies to 
reduce vulnerabilities in industrial control systems, and cyber 
forensics and attack attribution capabilities. DHS's activities 
are required to assist the development and accelerate the 
deployment of full information life cycle security 
technologies, information security measures, technologies to 
detect improper information access by authorized users, 
cryptographic technologies to protect information, methods to 
promote greater software assurance, and tools to securely and 
automatically update software and firmware in use.
    The new section requires the Under Secretary for S&T to 
coordinate research and development activities with the Under 
Secretary for NPPD, the heads of other revenant Federal 
departments and agencies, and industry and academia.
    The section also requires the Under Secretary for S&T to 
support projects through their full life cycle, identify mature 
technologies that address existing or imminent cybersecurity 
gaps in public or private information systems and networks, 
introduce new cybersecurity technologies, and target Federally-
funded cybersecurity research that demonstrates a high 
probability of successful transition to the commercial market 
within two years.
    The section defines ``cybersecurity risk,'' ``homeland 
security enterprise,'' ``incident,'' ``information system,'' 
and ``software assurance.''
    Subsection (b) amends Section 831 of the Homeland Security 
Act of 2002 to extend the Secretary of DHS's authority to 
conduct research and development programs until September 30, 
2022. It also amends Section 831(a)(2) of the Homeland Security 
Act of 2002, clarifying that the Secretary of DHS may carryout 
prototype projects in accordance with the requirements Congress 
established for the Secretary of Defense under section 2371b of 
title 10, United States Code. The subsection also updated the 
report language by removing and adding certain congressional 
committees and requiring that the report include the extent of 
cost-sharing for projects among Federal and non-Federal 
sources, the extent to which utilization of the authority has 
addressed a homeland security capability gap or threat, the 
amount of payments that were received by the Federal Government 
as a result of the utilization of the authority, and the 
outcome of each project. It also requires the Secretary to 
develop a training program for acquisitions staff on the proper 
use of the research and development authorities to ensure 
accountability and effective management of the projects.
    Section (c) provides that no additional funds are 
authorized. If additional funds are required to carry out the 
requirements, the funds must be used from other funding 
authorizations.

                   V. Evaluation of Regulatory Impact

    Pursuant to the requirements of paragraph 11(b) of rule 
XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, the Committee has 
considered the regulatory impact of this bill and determined 
that the bill will have no regulatory impact within the meaning 
of the rules. The Committee agrees with the Congressional 
Budget Office's statement that the bill contains no 
intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the 
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) and would impose no costs 
on state, local, or tribal governments.

             VI. Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate

    CBO failed to provide the Committee with a cost estimate in 
time for the final reporting deadline of the 115th Congress.

       VII. Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported

    In compliance with paragraph 12 of rule XXVI of the 
Standing Rules of the Senate, changes in existing law made by 
the bill, as reported, are shown as follows: (existing law 
proposed to be omitted is enclosed in brackets, new matter is 
printed in italic, and existing law in which no change is 
proposed is shown in roman):

HOMELAND SECURITY ACT OF 2002

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

SEC. 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Homeland 
Security Act of 2002.''
    (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act 
is as follows:

Sec. 1. * * *
     * * * * * * *
TITLE III--SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
     * * * * * * *
Sec. 321. Cybersecurity research and development.
     * * * * * * *

TITLE III--SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

SEC. 321. CYBERSECURITY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Under Secretary for Science and 
Technology shall support the research, development, testing, 
evaluation, and transition of cybersecurity technologies, 
including fundamental research to improve the sharing of 
information, information security, analytics, and methodologies 
related to cybersecurity risks and incidents, consistent with 
current law.
    (b) Activities.--The research and development supported 
under subsection (a) shall serve the components of the 
Department and shall--
          (1) advance the development and accelerate the 
        deployment of more secure information systems;
          (2) improve and create technologies for detecting and 
        preventing attacks or intrusions, including real-time 
        continuous diagnostics, real-time analytic 
        technologies, and full life cycle information 
        protection;
          (3) improve and create mitigation and recovery 
        methodologies, including techniques and policies for 
        real-time containment of attacks, and development of 
        resilient networks and information systems;
          (4) assist the development and support infrastructure 
        and tools to support cybersecurity research and 
        development efforts, including modeling, testbeds, and 
        data sets for assessment of new cybersecurity 
        technologies;
          (5) assist the development and support of 
        technologies to reduce vulnerabilities in industrial 
        control systems;
          (6) assist the development and support cyber 
        forensics and attack attribution capabilities;
          (7) assist the development and accelerate the 
        deployment of full information life cycle security 
        technologies to enhance protection, control, and 
        privacy of information to detect and prevent 
        cybersecurity risks and incidents;
          (8) assist the development and accelerate the 
        deployment of information security measures, in 
        addition to perimeter-based protections;
          (9) assist the development and accelerate the 
        deployment of technologies to detect improper 
        information access by authorized users;
          (10) assist the development and accelerate the 
        deployment of cryptographic technologies to protect 
        information at rest, in transit, and in use;
          (11) assist the development and accelerate the 
        deployment of methods to promote greater software 
        assurance;
          (12) assist the development and accelerate the 
        deployment of tools to securely and automatically 
        update software and firmware in use, with limited or no 
        necessary intervention by users and limited impact on 
        concurrently operating systems and processes; and
          (13) assist in identifying and addressing 
        unidentified or future cybersecurity threats.
    (c) Coordination.--In carrying out this section, the Under 
Secretary for Science and Technology shall coordinate 
activities with--
          (1) the Under Secretary appointed pursuant to section 
        103(a)(1)(H);
          (2) the heads of other relevant Federal departments 
        and agencies, as appropriate; and
          (3) industry and academia.
    (d) Transition to Practice.--The Under Secretary for 
Science and Technology shall--
          (1) support projects carried out under this title 
        through the full life cycle of such projects, including 
        research, development, testing, evaluation, pilots, and 
        transitions;
          (2) identify mature technologies that address 
        existing or imminent cybersecurity gaps in public or 
        private information systems and networks of information 
        systems, protect sensitive information within and 
        outside networks of information systems, identify and 
        support necessary improvements identified during pilot 
        programs and testing and evaluation activities, and 
        introduce new cybersecurity technologies throughout the 
        homeland security enterprise through partnerships and 
        commercialization; and
          (3) target federally funded cybersecurity research 
        that demonstrates a high probability of successful 
        transition to the commercial market within 2 years and 
        that is expected to have a notable impact on the public 
        or private information systems and networks of 
        information systems.
    (e) Definitions.--In this section:
          (1) Cybersecurity risk.--The term ``cybersecurity 
        risk'' has the meaning given the term in section 227.
          (2) Homeland security enterprise.--The term `homeland 
        security enterprise' means relevant governmental and 
        nongovernmental entities involved in homeland security, 
        including Federal, State, local, and tribal government 
        officials, private sector representatives, academics, 
        and other policy experts.
          (3) Incident.--The term `incident' has the meaning 
        given the term in section 227.
          (4) Information system.--The term `information 
        system' has the meaning given the term in section 3502 
        of title 44, United States Code.
          (5) Software Assurance.--The term `software 
        assurance' means confidence that software--
                  (A) is free from vulnerabilities, either 
                intentionally designed into the software or 
                accidentally inserted at any time during the 
                life cycle of the software; and
                  (B) functioning in the intended manner.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

TITLE VIII--COORDINATION WITH NON-FEDERAL ENTITIES; INSPECTOR GENERAL; 
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE; COAST GUARD; GENERAL PROVISIONS

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

Subtitle D--Acquisitions

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

SEC. 831. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.

    (a) Authority.--Until September 30, [2017] 2022, and 
subject to subsection (d), the Secretary may carry out a pilot 
program under which the Secretary may exercise the following 
authorities:
          (1) * * *
          (2) Prototype projects.--The Secretary may, under the 
        authority of paragraph (1), carry out prototype 
        projects in accordance with the requirements and 
        conditions provided for carrying out prototype projects 
        [under section 845 of the National Defense 
        Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103-
        160). In applying the authorities of that section 845, 
        subsection (c) of that section shall apply with respect 
        to prototype projects under this paragraph, and the 
        Secretary shall perform the functions of the Secretary 
        of Defense under subsection (d) thereof] under section 
        2371b of title 10, United States Code, and the 
        Secretary shall perform the functions of the Secretary 
        of Defense as prescribed.
    (b) * * *
    (c) Additional Requirements.--
          (1) In general.--The authority of the Secretary under 
        this section shall terminate September 30, [2017] 2022, 
        unless before that date the Secretary--
                  (A) * * *
                  (B) * * *
          [(2) Report.--The Secretary shall provide an annual 
        report to the Committees on Appropriations of the 
        Senate and the House of Representatives, the Committee 
        on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the 
        Senate, and the Committee on Homeland Security of the 
        House of Representatives detailing the projects for 
        which the authority granted by subsection (a) was used, 
        the rationale for its use, the funds spent using that 
        authority, the outcome of each project for which that 
        authority was used, and the results of any audits of 
        such projects.]
          (2) Report.--The Secretary shall annually submit to 
        the Committee on Homeland Security and the Committee on 
        Science, Space, and Technology of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security 
        and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report 
        detailing--
                  (A) the projects for which the authority 
                granted by subsection (a) was utilized;
                  (B) the rationale for those utilizations;
                  (C) the funds spent utilizing that authority;
                  (D) the extent of cost-sharing for those 
                projects among Federal and non-Federal sources;
                  (E) the extent to which utilization of that 
                authority has addressed a homeland security 
                capability gap or threat to the homeland 
                identified by the Department;
                  (F) the total amount of payments, if any, 
                that were received by the Federal Government as 
                a result of the utilization of that authority 
                during the period covered by each such report;
                  (G) the outcome of each project for which 
                that authority was utilized; and
                  (H) the results of any audits of those 
                projects.
    (d) Definition of Nontraditional Government Contractor.--In 
this section, the term ``nontraditional Government contractor'' 
has the same meaning as the term ``nontraditional defense 
contractor'' [as defined in section 845(e) of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103 
160; 10 U.S.C. 2371 note)] as defined in section 2302 of title 
10, United States Code.
    (e) Training.--The Secretary shall develop a training 
program for acquisitions staff on the utilization of the 
authority provided under subsection (a) to ensure 
accountability and effective management of projects consistent 
with the Program Management Improvement Accountability Act 
(Public Law 114 264) and the amendments made by such Act.

                                  [all]
```