alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 4003.58 Powers of the Appeals Board. ( a ) In addition to the powers specifically described in this part, the Appeals Board may request the submission of any information or the appearance of any person it considers necessary to resolve a matter before it and to enter any order it considers necessary for or appropriate to the disposition of any matter before it.
( b ) The Appeals Board may refer certain appeals to another PBGC department or to Appeals Board staff to provide a response to the appellant. The response from another PBGC department or Board staff will be in writing and address the matters raised in the appeal. The response may be in the form of an explanation or corrected benefit determination. In either case, the appellant will have 45 calendar-days from the date of the response to file a written request for review by the Appeals Board. If a written request for review is not filed with the Appeals Board within the 45-calendar-day period the initial determination will become effective pursuant to § 4003.22(a). ( 1 ) Appeals that may be referred to another PBGC department or to the Board staff include those that— ( i ) Request an explanation of the initial determination being appealed;
( ii ) Dispute specific data used in the initial determination, such as date of hire, date of retirement, date of termination of employment, length of service, compensation, marital status and form of benefit elected; or
( iii ) Request an explanation of the limits on benefits payable by PBGC under part 4022, subpart B, such as the maximum guaranteeable benefit and phase-in of the PBGC guarantee.
( 2 ) An explanation or corrected benefit determination issued under this subsection is not considered a decision of the Appeals Board. If an appellant aggrieved by PBGC's initial determination is issued an explanation or corrected benefit determination under this section, the appellant has not exhausted his or her administrative remedies until the appellant has filed a timely request with the Appeals Board for review and the Appeals Board has issued a decision granting or denying the relief requested. See § 4003.7 of this part.
[61 FR 34012, July 1, 1996, as amended at 73 FR 38120, July 3, 2008; 85 FR 10284, Feb. 24, 2020]
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1332, -1333, -1334

WILLIAM R. KOWALSKI,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MOMMY GINA TUNA RESOURCES,

KING TUNA, INC., JOAQUIN T. LU (also known as Jake Lu),

MOMMY GINA TUNA RESOURCES, INC., INTEGRAL SEAFOOD LLC,

GJ FRESH LLC, RICHARD FRIEND, SEAFRIEND,

and CITRA MINA SEAFOOD CORPORATION

(also known as Citra Mina Seafood Market),

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii in

consolidated case nos. 05-CV-00679, 05-CV-00787, and 06-CV-00182,

Magistrate Judge Barry M. Kurren.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of Mommy Gina Tuna Resources, et al.'s unopposed motion

for an extension of time, until August 17, 2009, to file their brief,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

JUN 24 2009

Date

	

Jan Horbaly

cc:	Carl Crowell, Esq.

Milton M. Yasunaga, Esq.

m2

Clerk nuer•

us. COURT OF ApFEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

JUN 2 4 2009

JAN HORtsiti

CLERK
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13064]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Indiana Michigan Power Company, Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 
1 and 2; Notice of Correction to Biweekly Notice of Issuance of 
Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses


  

    On May 17, 2000 (65 FR 31364), the Federal Register published the 
Biweekly Notice of Applications and Amendments to Operating Licenses 
Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations. On page 31364, under 
Indiana Michigan Power Company, Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316, the 
amendment number was incorrectly noted. It should read, ``Amendment 
Nos.: 244 and 225.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 18th day of May 2000.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
John F. Stang,
Senior Project Manager, Section 1, Project Directorate III, Division of 
Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 00-13064 Filed 5-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
§ 458.88 Submission of the Administrative Law Judge's recommended decision and order to the Administrative Review Board; exceptions. ( a ) After the close of the hearing, and the receipt of briefs, or findings and conclusions, if any, the Administrative Law Judge shall prepare his recommended decision and order expeditiously. The recommended decision and order shall contain findings of fact, conclusions, and the reasons or basis therefor including credibility determinations, and recommendations as to the disposition of the case including the remedial action to be taken.
( b ) The Administrative Law Judge shall cause his recommended decision and order to be served promptly on all parties to the proceeding. Thereafter, the Administrative Law Judge shall transfer the case to the Administrative Review Board including his recommended decision and order and the record. The record shall include the complaint, the notice of hearing, motions, rulings, orders, official transcript of the hearing, stipulations, objections, depositions, exhibits, documentary evidence and any briefs or other documents submitted by the parties.
( c ) Exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge's recommended decision and order may be filed by any party with the Administrative Review Board within fifteen (15) days after service of the recommended decision and order, in accordance with 29 CFR part 26. The Administrative Review Board may for good cause shown extend the time for filing such exceptions. Requests for additional time in which to file exceptions shall be in writing, and copies thereof shall be served on the other parties. Requests for extension of time must be received no later than three (3) days before the date the exceptions are due. Copies of such exceptions and any supporting briefs shall be served on all other parties, and a statement of such service shall be furnished to the Administrative Review Board.
[45 FR 15158, Mar. 7, 1980; 45 FR 28322, Apr. 29, 1980. Redesignated at 50 FR 31311, Aug. 1, 1985, as amended at 78 FR 8027, Feb. 5, 2013; 86 FR 1785, Jan. 11, 2021]
#### § 417.11 Objections to evidence.

Objections to the admission or exclusion of evidence may be made orally or in writing, but shall be in short form, stating the grounds for such objection. The transcript shall not include argument or debate thereon except as required by the Administrative Law Judge. Rulings on such objections shall be a part of the transcript. No such objections shall be deemed waived by further participation in the hearing. Formal exceptions are unnecessary and will not be taken to rulings on objections.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LUIS RIOS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 554

[ June 25, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Caroline Shepherd

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2010CF009222AXXXMB

.

Luis Rios, Carrabelle, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas,

Assistant Attorne y General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., C IKLIN and G ERBER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001074545
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING VI, L.P.


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-29-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         85
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                        (100)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,455
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,029
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          247,562
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,484
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    71
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                98,277
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (98,207)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (98,207)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (98,207)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
§ 1917.127 Sanitation. ( a ) *Washing and toilet facilities.* ( 1 ) The employer shall provide accessible washing and toilet facilities sufficient for the sanitary requirements of employees. The facilities shall have: ( i ) Running water, including hot and cold or tepid water at a minimum of one accessible location (when cargo handling is conducted at locations without permanent facilities, potable water may be provided in lieu of running water);
( ii ) Soap;
( iii ) Individual hand towels, clean individual sections of continuous toweling, or air blowers; and
( iv ) Fixed or portable toilets in separate compartments with latch-equipped doors. Separate toilet facilities shall be provided for male and female employees except when toilet rooms will be occupied by only one person at a time.
( 2 ) Washing and toilet facilities shall be regularly cleaned and maintained in good order.
( b ) *Drinking water.* ( 1 ) Potable drinking water shall be accessible to employees at all times.
( 2 ) Potable drinking water containers shall be clean, containing only water and ice, and shall be fitted with covers.
( 3 ) Common drinking cups are prohibited.
( c ) *Prohibited eating areas.* Consumption of food or beverages in areas where hazardous materials are being stored or handled shall be prohibited.
( d ) *Garbage and overboard discharges.* Work shall not be conducted in the immediate vicinity of uncovered garbage or in the way of overboard discharges from the vessel's sanitary lines unless employees are protected from the garbage or discharge by a baffle or splash boards.
[48 FR 30909, July 5, 1983,, as amended at 76 FR 33610, June 8, 2011]
Argued November 13,

affirmed December 4, 1928.

#### BARBARA HAFNER *v.*JOHN HAFNER.

(272 Pac. 288.)

For appellant there was a brief and oral argument by *Mr. W. C. Winslow.*

For respondent there was a brief over the names of *Mr. G. G. Smith*and *Mr. Hall S. Lush,*with an •oral argument by *Mr. Smith.*

McBRIDE, J.

This was a suit for divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. Defendant denied the allegation of cruel and inhuman treatment and filed a cross-complaint asking for a divorce from his wife on the ground of desertion. It would serve no good purpose to discuss the evidence in this case, but we are satisfied from the testimony that the defendant is a man possessed of a cross and surly disposition, having but slight affection for his children and little regard for his wife, except as a servant and workhand about the place. We think the evidence substantially indicates that from a very short time after the plaintiff and defendant were married up to the time she finally left him and went to Portland to live, his conduct toward her, both in word and deed, had been uniformly harsh and cruel extending, in not infrequent instances, to acts of physical violence, and that his conduct toward his children, of whom ten were born *355during the marriage, was not that of an affectionate father but of such a harsh character that they left the parental roof as soon as they were able to earn a living, and these, with one exception, corroborate their mother’s statement in regard to their father’s treatment of their mother as well as of themselves.

We do not think there is evidence of any con-donation of this continued course of ill treatment of plaintiff by defendant. Condonation, by living and cohabiting together after the offense, is confined to cases where adultery has been committed, and does not appiy strictly to instances of cruel and inhuman treatment. It seems more probable to us that this much abused plaintiff submitted to these indignities while her children were small, because as a good mother she could see no other course; and when the children were older and she saw an opportunity, possibly by their help, to escape the tyranny of her husband she took advantage of it. She is not to be blamed or legally condemned because she thought it better to stay with the family while the children were very young rather than to subject them to hardships, which would necessarily result from leaving her husband earlier. Unless the testimony of the plaintiff and that of all except one of the children is to be considered as absolutely perjured, and this is unthinkable, she has shown herself entitled to a divorce and the decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed. Affirmed.

Band, C. J., and Coshow and Bean, JJ., concur.
#### *E. Sneed and S. W. Stevens, administrators of G. Sneed, deceased, *adsm.*James Wallen.

Bail by ad ministrators on *habeas corpus.*
      *(a)*

THIS cause was removed by *habeas corpus,*from the Common Pleas of Gloucester.

*Woodruff,*for the plaintiff,

moved that the defendant file bail, or that a *procedendo*be awarded. *Pat.*364. *sec.*86.

*Pearson.*

The defendants are administrators, and therefore not bound to give bail, upon this *habeas corpus.*The statute does not apply to them.

*Anonymous, Pen. *641. Craig vs. Berry, post 852.*

Court.

Let common bail be filed.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 48939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20079]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12704 and <greek-i>12705]


Tennessee Disaster Number TN-00058

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION:  Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Tennessee 
(FEMA-4005-DR), dated 07/20/2011.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Straight-line Winds, Tornadoes, and 
Flooding.
    Incident Period: 06/18/2011 through 06/24/2011.
    Effective Date: 08/01/2011.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/19/2011.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/20/2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Tennessee, dated 07/20/2011, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Anderson.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-20079 Filed 8-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### FISHER BODY CO v CHEFLO

Ohio Supreme Court

No 22036.

Decided March 19, 1930

Marshall, CJ., Kinkade, Robinson, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 140 

To authorize legal representation in In the Matter of the Application of 

Committee on Finance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 10, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize legal representation in In the Matter of the 

Application of Committee on Finance. 

Whereas, in a proceeding styled In the Matter of the Application of Committee on Finance for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum, Misc. No. 07–134, in the United 

States District Court for the District of Columbia, the 

Senate Committee on Finance filed an application for a 

writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum; 

Whereas, on April 4, 2007, the Chief Judge of the United 

States District Court for the District of Columbia issued 

the writ sought by the Committee; 

Whereas the United States Department of Justice has raised 

questions about the Committee’s application for the writ 

and the writ that was issued; 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

SRES 140 ATS 

Whereas, pursuant to section 708(c) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. § 288g(c), the Senate may 

direct the Senate Legal Counsel to perform such duties 

consistent with the purposes and limitations of title VII 

of the Ethics in Government Act as the Senate may direct: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is author2 ized to represent the Committee on Finance in the pro3 ceeding styled In the Matter of the Application of Com4 mittee on Finance for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad 

5 Testificandum, Misc. No. 07–134 (D.D.C.). 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 91 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 91

   Honoring Army Specialist Monica L. Brown, of Lake Jackson, Texas, 
  extending gratitude to her and her family, and pledging continuing 
    support for the men and women of the United States Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2008

  Mrs. Hutchison (for herself and Mr. Cornyn) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Honoring Army Specialist Monica L. Brown, of Lake Jackson, Texas, 
  extending gratitude to her and her family, and pledging continuing 
    support for the men and women of the United States Armed Forces.

Whereas Monica Brown, a medic serving in the 782nd Brigade Support Battalion, 
        4th Brigade Combat Team, was deployed to Afghanistan in support of 
        Operation Enduring Freedom;
Whereas members of the United States Armed Forces were attacked by a roadside 
        bomb in the eastern Paktia province in Afghanistan on April 25, 2007;
Whereas Specialist Monica L. Brown, at age 19, ran through insurgent gunfire to 
        save the lives of fellow wounded soldiers injured after the roadside 
        bomb tore through their convoy of humvees;
Whereas Monica Brown is 1 of 25,109 women currently serving in the Armed Forces 
        in Afghanistan and Iraq, and 1 of 350,000 women serving in the United 
        States Army;
Whereas Monica Brown is the first woman in Afghanistan and only the second 
        female member of the Armed Forces since World War II to receive the 
        Silver Star, the Nation's third-highest medal for valor; and
Whereas the thoughts and prayers of Congress and the people of the United States 
        remain with the families of all the members of the Armed Forces who are 
        fighting to ensure the Nation's freedom and safety: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) honors Monica L. Brown, a Specialist in the United 
        States Army, who risked her life to save the lives of her 
        fellow wounded soldiers while serving in the Global War on 
        Terror in Afghanistan, and recognizes her for her bravery and 
        heroism;
            (2) extends its deepest gratitude to Monica L. Brown and 
        her family in Lake Jackson, Texas; and
            (3) pledges its continued support for the men and women of 
        the United States Armed Forces.
                                 <all>
```