# V1 Furnace NAIMA / U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report

Prepared for: 

# Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC

Waxahachie, Texas

Waxahachie Plant 3700 North Interstate 35 E Waxahachie, Texas 75165

BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 December 27, 2010

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 2615 Wolcott Street Ferndale, Michigan 48220 (248) 548-8070

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 27, 2010 

## i Executive Summary

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) and its members to a voluntary co llection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 1 

## as well as for the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 2 

## . To assist in collected the agreed upon data, BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was re tained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates of the following pollutants from the V-1 Oxy-Fuel Glass Melter Furnace process exhaust stack located at the Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC (Owens Corning) site in Waxahachie, Texas:

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate ma tter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM 2.5 

## )

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromi um, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium

• Mercury

• Hexavalent chromium

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and NAIMA prior to initiating test pr ogram fieldwork. Table I on the following page summarizes the overall results of the emissions test program.

1 

## Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD)
2 

## Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 27, 2010 

## ii Table I Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Test Date(s) Pollutant MDL used Emission Rate (lbs/hour) Emission Rate (lbs/ton) Emission Rate (mg/dscm)

Filterable PM 2.5 

## 1.3E-01 2.8E-02 3.3E+00 Organic Condensible PM 2.5 

## < 2.1E-02 4.5E-03 5.3E-01

Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 

## 1.8E+00 3.8E-01 4.5E+01 August 17 & 18, 2010

Total PM 2.5 

## 1.9E+00 4.1E-01 4.9E+01
Filterable Particulate 6.0E-02 1.2E-02 1.7E+00
Antimony < 1.9E-05 3.9E-06 5.5E-04 Arsenic 2.7E-05 6.0E-06 8.5E-04 Beryllium < 4.8E-06 9.7E-07 1.4E-04 Cadmium 1.1E-05 3.9E-06 5.5E-04 Chromium 2.7E-04 5.3E-05 7.6E-03 Cobalt < 4.8E-06 9.7E-07 1.4E-04 Lead 3.7E-05 7.4E-06 1.0E-03 Manganese 3.8E-05 7.5E-06 1.1E-03 Nickel < 2.8E-05 5.7E-06 8.1E-04 August 18 & 19, 2010

Selenium 3.0E-03 6.1E-04 8.7E-02
October 21 & 22, 2010 Mercury 2.3E-05 4.6E-06 6.9E-04

August 18 & 19, 2010 Hexavalent Chromium 1.5E-04 2.9E-05 4.0E-03
Hydrogen Chloride < 8.7E-03 1.8E-03 2.5E-01 August 18, 2010 Hydrogen Fluoride 6.2E-02 1.3E-02 1.8E+00

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

## because exhaust from the process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

## ). (2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the an alytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the sample fractions.

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 27, 2010 

## iii TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 2

2.1 P ROCESS 

## M ONITORING 

## ....................................................................................................... 2

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............................................. 2

3.1 E XHAUST 

## G AS 

## V ELOCITY 

## , M OLECULAR 

## W EIGHT 

## , AND 

## M OISTURE 

## C ONTENT 

## .................... 2 3.2 PM AND 

## PM 2.5 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................................... 3 3.3 T OTAL 

## S ELECTED 

## M ETALS 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................ 3 3.4 H G 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ..................................................................... 4 3.5 H EXAVALENT 

## C HROMIUM 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................. 4 3.6 HF AND 

## HC L 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ..................................................... 4

4.0 TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 5

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel Table 2 – Emissions Test Program Summary

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram Figure 2 – Method 3 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing Figure 3 – OTM 27/OTM 28 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing Figure 4 – Method 29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing Figure 5 – Method 30B Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing Figure 6 – Method 0061 Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing Figure 7 – Method 26A Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Detailed Test Run Results Appendix B – Production Data Appendix C – Field and Computer-G enerated Data Sheets and Notes Appendix D – Equipment Calibration Documents Appendix E – Laboratory Analytical Reports Appendix F – Initial Test Program Hg Test Results and Documentation

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 27, 2010 1 

## 1.0 Introduction

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) and its members to a voluntary co llection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 3 

## as well as for the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 4 

## . To assist in collected the agreed upon data, BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was re tained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates of the following pollutants from the V-1 Oxy-Fuel Glass Melter Furnace process exhaust stack located at the Owens Corning Insulating Systems, Inc. (Owens Corning) site in Waxahachie, Texas:

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate ma tter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM 2.5 

## )

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromi um, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium

• Mercury

• Hexavalent chromium

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. The emissions test program was conducted on August 17, 18, and 19, 2010 with re-testing for me rcury emissions on October 21 and 22, 2010. Mercury testing was conducted a second time becau se of unacceptable quality assurance results for the initial mercury testing conducted on August 17 and 18, 2010. Results reported in this test report reflect the mercury test ing conducted on October 21 and 22, 2010. All documents relevant to the mercury testing conducted on August 17 and 18, 2010 are included in Appendix F.

All testing was conducted by METCO Environmenta l of Carrollton, Texas. The test program consisted of triplicate emission tests at each location for each pa rameter. The field sampling portion of the emissions test program in cluded the personnel su mmarized by Table 1.

Table 1 Emissions Test Program Personnel Personnel Affiliation Shane Lee METCO Troy Gayer METCO John Cutaia METCO Matt Gillen METCO Michael Meadows METCO Rick Cooper Owens Corning Dave Jacobs Owens Corning

3 

## Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD)
4 

## Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 27, 2010 2 

## 2.0 Process Description

The V-1 Furnace is a gas-fired, oxy-fuel furnace wh ich supplies energy to the mixed glass batch via a combination of radiant, conductive and conv ective heating from a set of side wall burners fired with natural gas and oxygen whose hot combus tion products flow over the top of the batch. The furnace is equipped with a dry electrosta tic precipitator (DEP) to control particulate emissions that are created from batch charging an d glass volatiles that “boi l” from the surface of the molten glass condensing in the exhaust stream forming small diameter particulate matter.

The V-1 Furnace exhausts to a single, ground-mount ed exhaust stack. The stack is round and 36 inches in diameter. The two stack test ports ar e 4 inches in diameter located approximately 40 feet above ground level. The Owens Corning f acility in Waxahachie is located 3700 North Interstate 35 E in Waxahachie, Texas.

2.1 Process Monitoring

During the emissions test program, V-1 Melter Furnace was operated under normal conditions. In addition to total production (g lass pull rate) for each test run, process operating data recorded (every quarter hour) during the emissions test pr ogram included (1) inlet temperature, (2) oxygen purity, and (3) voltage readings for systems moni toring equipment. Process production data is available in Appendix B. Additional process monitoring and control equipment data will be available to U.S. EPA on request.

3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emi ssions test program can be separated into six categories as follows:

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, mo lecular weight, and moisture content; (2) Measurement of exhaust gas PM and PM 2.5 

## concentrations and emission rates; (3) Measurement of exhaust gas total selected metals concentrations and emission rates; (4) Measurement of exhaust gas Hg concentrations and emission rates; (5) Measurement of exhaust gas hexavalent chro mium concentrations and emission rates; and, (6) Measurement of exhaust gas HF and HCl concentrations and emission rates.

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologies by cate gory are summarized by Sections 3.1 through 3.6, respectively.

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moisture Content

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecula r weight, and moisture content was conducted using the following reference test methods codifi ed at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A):

• Method 1 - “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points”

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 27, 2010 3 

## • Method 2 - “Determination of Stack Gas Velo city and Volumetric Flowrate” • Method 3 - “Gas Analysis for the Determination of Dry Molecular Weight” • Method 4 - “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

These test methods were used to evaluate exha ust gas flowrates either in conjunction with the isokinetic sampling methodologies used to evaluate some pollutant emission rates or as separate, discrete measurements conducted in support of the non-isokinetic sa mpling methodologies.

Stack gas velocity traverses we re conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figure 1 for a traverse location drawing). An S-type pitot tube with a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accordance with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used to measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each location during testing. The S-type pitot tube was calibrated to a dimensionless value.

Exhaust gas O 2 

## and CO 2 

## content of the exhaust gas was de termined using the Orsat analysis procedures of Method 3 (see figure 2). Exhaus t gas moisture content was evaluated using Method 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was de termined volumetrically (liquid impingers) and gravimetrically (silica gel impinger).

3.2 PM and PM 2.5 

## Concentrations and Emission Rates

PM/PM 2.5 

## concentrations and emission rates were measured using U.S. EPA Other Test Methods (OTM) 27 and OTM 28. PM, PM 2.5 

## , and CPM concentrations and emission rates were measured using a Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stac k sampling system. This system will consisted of (1) a tapered nozzle, (2) a PM 10 

## particle sizer cyclone followed by a PM 2.5 

## particle sizer cyclone, (3) a glass or quartz fi ber filter assembly and h eated probe, (4) a glass recirculating ice water condenser system, (5) a set of four GS impingers, (6 ) a length of sample line, and (7) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pum p, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the second and th ird impingers were filled with 100 ml of HPLC water, the first and fourth impingers we re empty, and the fifth impinger contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccan t. A schematic drawing of the PM 2.5 

## /CPM sample train is provided as Figure 3. The total filterable PM faction was collected on the front half of the M29 Metals sampling train as per the QAPP.

3.3 

## Total Selected Metals Concentr ations and Emission Rates

Total selected metals concentrations and emissi on rates were measured us ing the procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 29. Selected meta ls concentrations and emission rates were measured using a Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stac k sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a borosilicate glas s or quartz nozzle, (2) a steel pr obe w/glass liner, (3) a heated quartz fiber filter assembly, (4) a set of six GS im pingers, (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a
Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calib rated orifice. Prior to each test, the first two impingers were fill ed with 100 ml of a 5% nitric acid (HNO 3 

## )/10% hydrogen peroxide solution, th e third impinger was empty, and the fourth contained

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 27, 2010 4 

## approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A sc hematic drawing of the metals sampling train is provided as Figure 4.

3.4 Hg Concentrations and Emission Rates

Hg concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 30B and using a Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a sorben t trap, (2) a steel probe , (3) Teflon tubing, (4) three GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. The first impinger was left empty as a water knockout, and the remaining two impingers co ntained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Hg sampling train is provided as Figure 5.

3.5 Hexavalent Chromium Concentr ations and Emission Rates

Hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of Method 0061 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM-98.01. Hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates were measured using Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isoki netic stack sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a glass noz zle, (2) a heated steel probe with a glass probe liner, (4) a Teflon tee with a recirculating pump, (5 ) five GS impingers, (6) a length of sample line, and (7) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and a calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first impinger wa s filled with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the next two were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N KOH, the fourth was empty, and the last impinger contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Method 0061 sampling train is provided as Figure 6.

3.6 HF and HCl Concentratio ns and Emission Rates

Measurement of hydrogen halide co ncentrations and emission rates were conducted using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appe ndix A, Method 26A. The Method 26A sampling train consisted of: (1) a heated borosilicate or qu artz probe liner; (2) a heated bor osilicate or quartz glass filter holder containing a pre-weighed 110-mm diameter washed quartz filter with Teflon filter support; (3) a set of three Gr eensburg-Smith (GS) impingers each containing 100 ml of 0.1 Normal Sulfuric Acid (0.1 N H 2 

## SO 4 

## ), (4) a modified GS impinger containing a known weight of silica gel desiccant; (5) a length of sample line, and (7) a Nutech control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Fi gure 7 provides an illustration of the Method 26A sample train.

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 27, 2010 5 

## 4.0 Test Results

The overall results of the emissions te st program are summarized by Table 2.

Table 2 Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Test Date(s) Pollutant MDL used Emission Rate (lbs/hour) Emission Rate (lbs/ton) Emission Rate (mg/dscm)

Filterable PM 2.5 

## 1.3E-01 2.8E-02 3.3E+00 Organic Condensible PM 2.5 

## < 2.1E-02 4.5E-03 5.3E-01

Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 

## 1.8E+00 3.8E-01 4.5E+01 August 17 & 18, 2010

Total PM 2.5 

## 1.9E+00 4.1E-01 4.9E+01
Filterable Particulate 6.0E-02 1.2E-02 1.7E+00
Antimony < 1.9E-05 3.9E-06 5.5E-04 Arsenic 2.7E-05 6.0E-06 8.5E-04 Beryllium < 4.8E-06 9.7E-07 1.4E-04 Cadmium 1.1E-05 3.9E-06 5.5E-04 Chromium 2.7E-04 5.3E-05 7.6E-03 Cobalt < 4.8E-06 9.7E-07 1.4E-04 Lead 3.7E-05 7.4E-06 1.0E-03 Manganese 3.8E-05 7.5E-06 1.1E-03 Nickel < 2.8E-05 5.7E-06 8.1E-04 August 18 & 19, 2010

Selenium 3.0E-03 6.1E-04 8.7E-02
October 21 & 22, 2010 Mercury 2.3E-05 4.6E-06 6.9E-04

August 18 & 19, 2010 Hexavalent Chromium 1.5E-04 2.9E-05 4.0E-03
Hydrogen Chloride < 8.7E-03 1.8E-03 2.5E-01 August 18, 2010 Hydrogen Fluoride 6.2E-02 1.3E-02 1.8E+00

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

## because exhaust from the process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

## ). (2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the an alytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the sample fractions.

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03 NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 27, 2010 6 

## Detailed results for individual emission test run are summarized in Appendix A. Process production data is included in Appendix B. Fi eld and computer-generated data sheets are included in Appendix C. Appendix D includes calibration documents and Appendix E includes laboratory analytical reports. Appendix F includes documents re levant to the initial mercury testing conducted on August 17 and 18, 2010.

Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this report are exclusively for use by NAIMA and/or Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC. BTEC will not distribute or publish this report without NAIMA’s consent except as required by la w or court order. BTEC accepts responsibility for the competent performance of its duties in executing the assignment and preparing reports in accordance with the normal standards of the pr ofession, but disclaims any responsibility for consequential damages.

This report was prepared by: David Center Staff Environmental Engineer

This report was reviewed by: Randal J. Tysar Senior Environmental Engineer

# FIGURES

### diameter = 36"

Points Distance "
12 0.8
11 2.4 10 4.2 9 6.4 8 9.0 7 12.8 6 23.2 5 27.0 4 29.6 3 31.8 2 33.6 1 35.2



## Figure 1
Site: Owens Corning Waxahachie, Texas V-1 Glass Melter Furnace BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 2615 Wolcott Street Ferndale, Michigan Not to Scale <0.5 diameters

<2 diameters

### Bags Samples
to ORSAT



## Figure 2
Site: USEPA Method 3; ORSAT Owens Corning Waxahachie, Texas V-1 Glass Melter Furnace BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 2615 Wolcott Street Ferndale, Michigan ORSAT pump tedlar bag

### Figure 3

Site: USEPA OTM27/28 Owens Corning Waxahachie, Texas V-1 Glass Melter Furnace BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 2615 Wolcott Ferndale, Michigan Pump Silica gel Heated Filter Box

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

Probe

Filter

On Off

- + 00:00

1 2 3 4 5 45mm Filter Housing Filter Holder W/ Teflon Filter Verticle Condenser

Pot Belly Impinger 100 mL DI H 2 OFigure 4Site:USEPA Method 29Owens CorningWaxahachie, TexasV-1 Glass Melter FurnaceBT Environmental Consulting Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale Michigan 48220PumpSilica gel100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solutionHeated Filter BoxS-Type Pitot w/ ThermocoupleHeated Probe w/ Glass Liner & NozzleMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Figure 5Site:USEPA Method 30B Sampling TrainOwens CorningWaxahachie, TexasV-1 Glass Melter FurnaceBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, Michigan 48220Knock outPumpTemperature sensorMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Sample LineDessicantMercuryTrapProbeFigure 6Site:USEPA Method 0061Owens CorningWaxahachie, TexasV-1 Glass Melter FurnaceBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, MichiganPumpMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5150 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptySilica GelPeristaltic pumpTeflon tee75 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptyFigure 7Site:USEPA Method 26A Sampling TrainOwens CorningWaxahachie, TexasV-1 Glass Melter FurnaceBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, MichiganPumpHeated Filter BoxS-type pitot w/ thermocoupleHeated probe with glass linerMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Empty15 mL 0.1N H2SO4Silica Gel

# Appendix A :

Detailed Test Run Results

### Plant Job # Location OTM27/OTM 28 Testing

Copyright by Walter Smith Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 8/17/2010 8/17/2010 8/18/2010 Start Run Start Time 8:20:00 13:15:00 7:31:00 Run Finish Time 12:28:00 17:39:00 12:12:30 Net Traversing Points 12 12 12 

### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 277.25 238.71 240.05 252 

### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.223 0.211 0.211 0.215 

### C p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.804 0.804 0.804 0.80 

### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.012 1.012 1.012 1.012 

### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.31 29.25 29.30 29.29 

### Δ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 0.40 0.38 0.38 0.39 

### V m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 101.123 101.114 98.665 100.301


### t m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 75.75 82.79 72.88 77.14 

### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 98.899 97.403 96.978 97.760 

### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 213.6 203.7 204.2 207.2 

### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 10.05 9.59 9.61 9.75 

### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 9.2 9.0 9.0 9.1 

### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.908 0.910 0.910 0.909 

### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 1 1 0.9 1.0 

### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.3 18.8 19.4 19.5 

### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 78.7 80.2 79.7 79.5 

### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.97 28.91 28.92 28.93 

### M s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 27.96 27.93 27.94 27.94 

### P g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.3 -0.30 -0.30 -0.30 

### P s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.29 29.23 29.28 29.26


### t s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 372 378 371 374 

### Δ P avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.417 0.412 0.412 0.413



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 44.6 44.6 44.4 44.5 

### A s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 

### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 10,677 10,604 10,640 10,640 

### Q aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 18,923 18,922 18,818 18,888 

### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 87.1 112.5 110.9 103.5



### W p Production, tons glass per hour 

### W Filterable PM 2.5 Catch Weight, mg 8.90 10.30 8.40 9.35 

### C mg/dscm Filterable PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 3.2E+00 3.7E+00 3.1E+00 3.3E+00 

### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Filterable PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A


### E lb/hr Filterable PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.3E-01 1.5E-01 1.2E-01 1.3E-01 

### E lb/ton product Filterable PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product


### W Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Catch Weight, mg 2.10 1.20 1.10 1.5 

### C mg/dscm Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 7.5E-01 4.4E-01 4.0E-01 5.3E-01 

### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A


### E lb/hr Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.0E-02 1.7E-02 1.6E-02 2.1E-02 

### E lb/ton product Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product


### W Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Catch Weight, mg 138 118 118 124.7 

### C mg/dscm Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 4.9E+01 4.3E+01 4.3E+01 4.5E+01 

### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A


### E lb/hr Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.0E+00 1.7E+00 1.7E+00 1.8E+00 

### E lb/ton product Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product


### W Total PM 2.5 Catch Weight, mg 149.0 129.5 127.5 135.3 

### C mg/dscm Total PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 5.3E+01 4.7E+01 4.6E+01 4.9E+01 

### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Total PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A


### E lb/hr Total PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.1E+00 1.9E+00 1.9E+00 1.9E+00 

### E lb/ton product Total PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

### 10-3990.03 Owens Corning Waxahachie TX Address

- PersonnelPlant Job # Location Method 29 Metals

Copyright by Walter Smith Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 8/18/2010 8/19/2010 8/19/2010 Start Run Start Time 16:02:00 7:00:00 10:53:00 Run Finish Time 19:14:00 10:08:00 15:00:00 Net Traversing Points 12 12 12 Θ Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 180 D N Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.316 0.316 0.316 0.316 C p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.812 0.812 0.812 0.81 Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.982 0.982 0.982 0.982 P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.24 29.27 29.27 29.26 Δ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.63 1.66 1.86 1.72 V m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 132.073 132.498 137.832 134.134
t m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 76.44 70.11 77.17 74.57 V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 125.263 127.307 130.760 127.777 V l c Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 270.7 288 291.1 283.3 V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 12.74 13.56 13.70 13.33 % H 2 O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 9.2 9.6 9.5 9.4 M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.908 0.904 0.905 0.906 %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.0 19.3 19.3 19.5 % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.2 79.8 79.8 79.6 M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.93 28.92 28.92 28.92 M s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 27.92 27.87 27.88 27.89 P g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.35 -0.30 -0.30 -0.32 P s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.21 29.25 29.25 29.24
t s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 383 379 382 381 Δ P av g Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.302 0.306 0.346 0.318

v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 38.7 38.9 41.5 39.7 A s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 9,102 9,182 9,753 9,345 Q aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 16,417 16,499 17,585 16,834 %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.5 100.1 96.7 98.8

W p Production, tons glass per hour W Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 7.8 1.4 9.2 6.1 C m g /dscm Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm 2.2 0.4 2.5 1.7E+00 C m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/h r Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 0.07 0.01 0.09 6.0E-02 E lb/ton product Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Antimony Catch Weight, μg 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 C m g /dscm Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm 5.6E-04 5.5E-04 5.4E-04 5.5E-04 C m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/h r Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.9E-05 1.9E-05 2.0E-05 1.9E-05 E lb/ton product Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Arsenic Catch Weight, μg 2.8 2.6 3.8 3.1 C m g /dscm Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm 7.9E-04 7.2E-04 1.0E-03 8.5E-04 C m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/h r Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.7E-05 2.5E-05 3.7E-05 3.0E-05 E lb/ton product Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Beryllium Catch Weight, μg 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 C m g /dscm Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 C m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/h r Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.8E-06 4.8E-06 4.9E-06 4.8E-06 E lb/ton product Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Cadmium Catch Weight, μg 1.19 2.06 2.72 1.99 C m g /dscm Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm 3.4E-04 5.7E-04 7.3E-04 5.5E-04 C m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/h r Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.1E-05 2.0E-05 2.7E-05 1.9E-05 E lb/ton product Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Chromium Catch Weight, μg 28.81 24.41 29.31 27.51 C m g /dscm Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 8.1E-03 6.8E-03 7.9E-03 7.6E-03 C m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/h r Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.8E-04 2.3E-04 2.9E-04 2.7E-04 E lb/ton product Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Cobalt Catch Weight, μg 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 C m g /dscm Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 C m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/h r Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.8E-06 4.8E-06 4.9E-06 4.8E-06 E lb/ton product Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Lead Catch Weight, μg 2.67 2.87 5.87 3.80 C m g /dscm Lead Concentration, mg/dscm 7.5E-04 8.0E-04 1.6E-03 1.0E-03 C m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Lead Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/h r Lead Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.6E-05 2.7E-05 5.8E-05 3.7E-05 E lb/ton product Lead Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Manganese Catch Weight, μg 3.72 4.12 3.82 3.89 C m g /dscm Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm 1.0E-03 1.1E-03 1.0E-03 1.1E-03 C m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/h r Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.6E-05 3.9E-05 3.8E-05 3.8E-05 E lb/ton product Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Nickel Catch Weight, μg 3.80 2.50 2.50 2.93 C m g /dscm Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm 1.1E-03 6.9E-04 6.8E-04 8.1E-04 C m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/h r Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.7E-05 2.4E-05 2.5E-05 2.8E-05 E lb/ton product Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Selenium Catch Weight, μg 394.0 288.0 256.0 312.7 C m g /dscm Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.1E-01 8.0E-02 6.9E-02 8.7E-02 C m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/h r Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.8E-03 2.7E-03 2.5E-03 3.0E-03 E lb/ton product Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 10-286A OWENS WAXAHACHIE, TX Address GILLEN PersonnelCompany NamePlant Location CityPlant Location StateSource NameSource ID**OWENS WAXHACHIE, TX TEXAS V-1 DEP STACK EPN-3 Please note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"** Measured Value(mg/dscm)CorrectedConcentration(mg/dscm at 7% O2)Basis (Wet or Dry)Test Method Used(EPA Method 30B)Data Flag (ADL,BDL, DDL)Test MethodCommentsCalculatedEmission Rate(lb/hr)ProcessProduction Rate(tons glass/hr)CalculatedEmission Rate(lb/ton)**1 8/17/2010 8:20 8/17/2010 10:20 1.32E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 5.29E-06** **3 8/17/2010 14:10 8/17/2010 16:25 2.05E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 8.18E-06** **5 8/18/2010 7:05 8/18/2010 9:05 4.40E-05 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 1.76E-06** Test End TimeRun Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateTotal Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results**M30B - Owens.xls Hg Emission Data-30B** **1/24/2011**QA/QC DocumentationTrap IDSection 1Mass (ng)Section 2Mass (ng)TotalMass (ng)InitialSpike(ng)Total Non-Spike (ng)SampleVolume(dscm)VolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough(%)BreaktroughLimitConcentration(μg/dscm)**9.25 1.0 20.3 18,904 10,697 380.46 R1, B 5.77 9.44 15.21 15.21 0.12 0% 164** **0.13 8.99 1.0 20.3 18,913 10,633 383.83** **R3, B 1.49 21.8 23.29 23.29 0.11 1% 1463 0.21** **9.64 1.0 18.8 18,789 10,667 382.04 R5, B 4.85 0.25 5.1 5.1 0.12 1% 5** **0.04**Flue GasTemperature (F)Other Supporting InformationFlue GasMoisture(%)Flue GasO2(%)Flue GasCO2(%)Flue Gas FlowRate (dscfm)Flue GasFlow Rate(acfm)Trap #1≤**20% of field recovery test** ≤**10% of Section 1 Hg mass for** **Hg conc. >1**μ**g/dscm: or**≤**20% of Section 1 for Hg conc.≤1** **μg/dscm M30B - Owens.xls** **Hg Emission Data-30B 1/24/2011** Trap IDSection 1MassSection 2MassTotalMassInitialSpikeTotal Non-SpikeSampleVolumeVolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough (%)BreaktroughLimitConcentration(μg/dscm)Abs. diff. RD (%) LimitCrecR (%) by RunRavg(%)Limit**R1, A 7.67 67.00 74.67 10 64.67 0.11 0% 874 0.6** **0.4 62 0.5175 595** **R3, A 3.37 21.80 25.17 10 15.17 0.11 1% 647 0.1** **0.1 21 0.0184 21** **R5, A 164.00 0.25 164.25 10 154.25 0.12 1% 0 1.3** **1.3 94 1.3840 1592** **736 Average** **Recovery, between 85 and** **115%**Trap #2Paired Trap Agreement (RD) Measured Spike Recovery ( R )≤**20% of field recovery test** ≤**10% of Section 1 Hg mass for Hg** **conc. >1**μ**g/dscm: or**≤**20% of Section 1 for Hg conc.≤1** **μg/dscm**≥**10 % RD mass for Hg conc. >1** **μg/dscm: or**≤**20% RD or** ≤**0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff.** **for Hg conc.**≤1**μg/dscm M30B - Owens.xls** **Hg Emission Data-30B 1/24/2011** 

## Plant Job # Location Hex Chrome Testing

Copyright by Walter Smith Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 8/18/2010 8/19/2010 8/19/2010 Start Run Start Time 16:02:00 7:00:00 10:53:00 Run Finish Time 19:14:00 10:08:00 14:00:00 Net Traversing Points 12 12 12 

### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 180 

### D N Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.304 0.304 0.304 0.304 

### C p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.833 0.833 0.833 0.83 

### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.012 1.012 1.012 1.012 

### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.24 29.27 29.27 29.26 

### Δ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.37 1.29 1.31 1.32 

### V m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 123.329 123.783 124.068 123.727


### t m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 77.39 70.28 76.76 74.81 

### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 120.255 122.415 121.221 121.297 

### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 248.6 290.6 255.8 265.0 

### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 11.70 13.68 12.04 12.47 

### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 8.9 10.1 9.0 9.3 

### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.911 0.899 0.910 0.907 

### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 

### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.0 19.3 19.3 19.5 

### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.2 79.8 79.8 79.6 

### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.93 28.92 28.92 28.92 

### M s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 27.96 27.82 27.93 27.90 

### P g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.35 -0.30 -0.30 -0.32 

### P s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.21 29.25 29.25 29.24


### t s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 382 345 330 353 

### Δ P avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.283 0.322 0.328 0.311



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 38.2 40.2 40.0 39.5 

### A s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 

### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 9,046 9,818 10,104 9,656 

### Q a w Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 16,222 17,040 16,981 16,747 

### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 103.8 97.3 93.7 98.2



### W p Production, tons glass per hour 

### W Hexavalent Chromium Catch Weight, μg 12.4 15.4 16.4 14.7 

### C mg/dscm Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 3.6E-03 4.4E-03 4.8E-03 4.3E-03 

### C mg/dscm@7%O 2 Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A 

### E lb/h r Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.2E-04 1.6E-04 1.8E-04 1.6E-04 

### E lb/ton product Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-286A OWENS WAXAHACHIE, TX Address LEE Personnel

## Plant Job # Location HCl and HF Testing

Copyright by Walter Smith Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 8/18/2010 8/18/2010 8/18/2010 Start Run Start Time 9:37:00 11:40:00 13:35:00 Run Finish Time 10:42:00 13:05:00 14:45:00 Net Traversing Points 12 12 12 

### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 60 

### D N Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.304 0.304 0.304 0.304 

### C p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.812 0.812 0.812 0.81 

### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.982 0.982 0.982 0.982 

### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.30 29.32 29.32 29.31 

### Δ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.41 1.40 1.42 1.41 

### V m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 41.643 41.878 41.889 41.803


### t m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 70.83 75.08 75.04 73.65 

### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 39.973 39.906 39.921 39.933 

### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 86.9 82.7 90.7 86.8 

### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 4.09 3.89 4.27 4.08 

### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 9.3 8.9 9.7 9.3 

### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.907 0.911 0.903 0.907 

### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.9 0.9 1 0.9 

### %O 2 Oxygen, % 19.4 19.4 19.5 19.4 

### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.7 79.7 79.5 79.6 

### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.92 28.92 28.94 28.93 

### M s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 27.91 27.95 27.88 27.91 

### P g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.3 -0.30 -0.30 -0.30 

### P s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.28 29.30 29.30 29.29


### t s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 380 385 383 382


### Δ P avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.323 0.323 0.324 0.323



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 39.8 39.8 39.9 39.8 

### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 

### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 9,429 9,410 9,373 9,404 

### Q aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 16,881 16,886 16,915 16,894 

### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.6 99.3 100.1 99.7



### W p Production, tons glass per hour 

### W HCl Catch Weight, μg 200 200 440 280.0 

### C mg/dscm HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 1.8E-01 1.8E-01 3.9E-01 2.5E-01 

### C mg/dscm@7%O2 HCl Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A


### E lb/hr HCl Emission Rate, pounds/hr 6.2E-03 6.2E-03 1.4E-02 8.7E-03 

### E lb/ton product HCl Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

### W HF Catch Weight, μg 1900 2100 2000 2000.0 

### C mg/dscm HF Concentration, mg/dscm 1.7E+00 1.9E+00 1.8E+00 1.8E+00 

### C mg/dscm@7%O2 HF Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A


### E lb/hr HF Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.9E-02 6.6E-02 6.2E-02 6.2E-02 

### E lb/ton product HF Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-286A BTEC WAXAHACHIE, TX Address GILLEN Personnel

# Appendix B :

Production Data

# Appendix C :

Field and Computer Generated Data Sheets and Notes

### Spreadsheet for U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 040 - Determina **tion of PM10 and PM2.5 Emissions** 

## TEST DATA SHEET

Location: Start Time: RUN No.
Date: End Time: JOB No.

% Moisture: 9.25 **% est.** METER BOX: Ts (°F): 

### 792 Tm (°F): 

### 75 Ts-50° 742 Ts+50° 842
Barometric: 29.31 **in Hg** Y: 1.012 Est. Qs: 1.023 **cfm** Est. Qs: 1.024 Est. Qs: 

### 1.048 Static Press: -0.30 **in H 2**  

### O ∆ H@: 0.4 **in H 2**  

### O Est. μ s 

### : 322.29 **mpoise** 

### Est. μ s 

### : 312.72 Est. μ s 

### : 331.7 Stack Press: 29.29 **in Hg** Cp': 0.804 S/N T3-8-1 Est. ∆ H: 0.108 **("H 2**  

### O) Est. ∆ H: 0.117 Est. ∆ H: 

### 0.100 %CO 2 

### : 1.00 **%** Cp: 0.804 S/N T3-8-1 %O 2 

### : 20.30 **%** Nozzle Dia: 0.223 **inches** DGM initial **cf**
%N 2 

### /CO: 78.70 **%** Stack Area: 7.069 **ft 2**  

### DGM final **cf**
M d 

### : 28.97 **lb/lb-mole** 

### # of Points: 12 **points** Time **min.** Est. M w 

### : 27.96 **lb/lb-mole** 

### 240.25 **min** Leak Rate **cfm** T std 

### : 528 **°R** P std 

### : 29.92 **in Hg** Vacuum **in. Hg**

Pitot Pump

∆ P Vac. Imp. ("H 2 

### O) Inlet Outlet Stack Ideal Actual (in Hg) Probe Filter Exit
**1 24.06 0.450 71.0 72.0 374 0.242 0.400 5 249 249 65 0.610 10.75 2.65** 
**2 24.59 0.470 72.0 72.0 374 0.242 0.400 5 250 249 50 0.607 10.78 2.67** 
**3 24.33 0.460 75.0 72.0 375 0.242 0.400 5 250 250 53 0.608 10.78 2.67** 
**4 23.24 0.420 77.0 75.0 375 0.241 0.400 5 249 249 58 0.692 9.83 2 .27** 
**5 22.40 0.390 78.0 77.0 374 0.243 0.400 5 249 250 51 0.652 10.24 2.44** 
**6 19.65 0.300 77.0 77.0 357 0.244 0.400 5 249 249 55 0.615 10.52 2.54** 
**7 23.24 0.420 76.0 77.0 371 0.254 0.400 5 251 251 70 0.639 10.37 2.49** 
**8 24.59 0.470 76.0 76.0 377 0.246 0.400 5 250 249 56 0.660 10.19 2.42** 
**9 24.85 0.480 77.0 76.0 377 0.242 0.400 5 251 247 55 0.631 10.52 2.56** 
**10 23.52 0.430 77.0 76.0 376 0.242 0.400 5 249 249 56 0.665 10.1 2 2.39** 
**11 21.52 0.360 78.0 77.0 371 0.243 0.400 5 250 249 51 0.725 9.48** 2.13
**12 21.22 0.350 80.0 77.0 357 0.246 0.400 5 249 249 55 0.487** 12.40 3.38
**13 - 0.254** 

**-** - **#VALUE!** 

### Final DGM:

Max

535.4 °R 831.2 °R Vac.

277.21 min 101.12 cf 0.417 75.8 °F 371.5 °F 5 0.400 in H 2 

### O fps



### Test Personnel (signature/date) Project Leader (sign ature/date) ∆ H (in H 2 

### 0) +/- 50°F ∆ H 

## EQUIPMENT

49-5 ESTIMATES

Orifice Press. 7 0.004 0.017

D 50

[10 μ m]



### 694.430 **685.970** Run Time:

DGM Gas Temperatures (°F) 

### 15 0
0.004

Gas Temps

1 1

**746.080**
**755.070**
**764.100**
**770.203** 17-Aug-2010SamplePoint Dwell Time (min)



### 669.080 

## STACK DATA

Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft 3 

### ) OWENS

Qs (acfm) (°F)

**677.450**

**737.090**

T s (avg) 

### 703.670
**712.100**
**719.207**
**727.790**

**770.203**

Actual Run Time 

## V m 

### ∆Η (avg)

44.602



## V s (avg) 

### T m (avg) 

### D 50 [2.5

μ m]



### in H 2 

### O 

## ∆ P (avg) 1
10-286A



## LEAK CHECKS
0 8:20 AM
12:28 PM

0.017

**Copyright 2006 by Environmental Supply Company, Inc.**

### Spreadsheet for U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 040 - Determina **tion of PM10 and PM2.5 Emissions** 

## TEST DATA SHEET

Location: Start Time: RUN No.
Date: End Time: JOB No.

% Moisture: 9.25 **% est.** METER BOX: Ts (°F): 

### 371.5 Tm (°F): 

### 76 Ts-50° 321.5 Ts+50° 421.5
Barometric: 29.25 **in Hg** Y: 1.012 Est. Qs: 0.638 **cfm** Est. Qs: 0.661 Est. Qs: 

### 0.685 Static Press: -0.30 **in H 2**  

### O ∆ H@: 0.38 **in H 2**  

### O Est. μ s 

### : 236.03 **mpoise** 

### Est. μ s 

### : 224.8 Est. μ s 

### : 247.03 Stack Press: 29.23 **in Hg** Cp': 0.804 S/N T3-8-1 Est. ∆ H: 0.090 **("H 2**  

### O) Est. ∆ H: 0.102 Est. ∆ H: 

### 0.080 %CO 2 

### : 1.00 **%** Cp: 0.804 S/N T3-8-1 %O 2 

### : 18.80 **%** Nozzle Dia: 0.211 **inches** DGM initial **cf**
%N 2 

### /CO: 80.20 **%** Stack Area: 7.069 **ft 2**  

### DGM final **cf**
M d 

### : 28.91 **lb/lb-mole** 

### # of Points: 12 **points** Time **min.** Est. M w 

### : 27.90 **lb/lb-mole** 

### 240.00 **min** Leak Rate **cfm** T std 

### : 528 **°R** P std 

### : 29.92 **in Hg** Vacuum **in. Hg**

Pitot Pump

∆ P Vac. Imp. ("H 2 

### O) Inlet Outlet Stack Ideal Actual (in Hg) Probe Filter Exit
**1** 21.29 0.470 78.0 79.0 374 0.090 0.380 5 251 228 84 0.645 10.34 2 .48
2 20.83 0.450 78.0 79.0 378 0.090 0.380 5 249 249 56 0.587 11.09 2.81
3 20.36 0.430 82.0 80.0 378 0.089 0.380 5 251 249 61 0.762 9.21 2.03
4 19.64 0.400 83.0 81.0 379 0.090 0.380 5 250 249 53 0.786 9.02 1.96
5 19.14 0.380 84.0 82.0 377 0.090 0.380 5 250 250 58 0.807 8.84 1.89
6 17.01 0.300 86.0 83.0 353 0.090 0.380 5 250 250 54 0.830 8.48 1.74
7 20.36 0.430 83.0 83.0 379 0.096 0.380 5 251 250 71 0.774 9.12 2.00
8 20.83 0.450 86.0 84.0 381 0.090 0.380 5 250 249 53 0.724 9.58 2.18
9 20.83 0.450 85.0 84.0 383 0.090 0.380 5 249 249 55 0.739 9.46 2.13
10 19.64 0.400 85.0 84.0 385 0.089 0.380 5 249 249 58 0.815 8.85 1.90
11 19.64 0.400 85.0 84.0 385 0.089 0.380 5 250 250 59 0.618 10.7 6 2.67
12 19.14 0.380 85.0 84.0 383 0.089 0.380 5 250 250 58 0.705 9.78 2.26
13 - 0.089

- - #VALUE! 

### Final DGM:

Max

542.8 °R 837.9 °R Vac.

238.71 min 101.11 cf 0.412 82.8 °F 377.9 °F 5 0.380 in H 2 

### O fps



### Test Personnel (signature/date) Project Leader (sign ature/date) ∆ H (in H 2 

### 0) +/- 50°F ∆ H 

## EQUIPMENT

49-5 ESTIMATES

Orifice Press. 12 0.003 0.013

D 50

[10 μ m]



### 795.000 786.030 Run Time:

DGM Gas Temperatures (°F) 

### 15 0
0.003

Gas Temps

1 1

848.149
857.379
864.379
872.179 17-Aug-2010SamplePoint Dwell Time (min)



### 771.065 

## STACK DATA

Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft 3 

### ) OWENS

Qs (acfm) (°F)

779.000

839.249

T s (avg) 

### 803.930
812.900
821.364
830.499

872.179

Actual Run Time 

## V m 

### ∆Η (avg)

44.632



## V s (avg) 

### T m (avg) 

### D 50 [2.5

μ m]



### in H 2 

### O 

## ∆ P (avg) 2
10-286A



## LEAK CHECKS
0 8:20 AM
12:28 PM

0.013

Copyright 2006 by Environmental Supply Company, Inc.

### Spreadsheet for U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 040 - Determination of PM10 and PM2.5 Emissions 

## TEST DATA SHEET

Location: Start Time: RUN No.
Date: End Time: JOB No.

% Moisture: 9 **% est.** METER BOX: Ts (°F): 

### 377.9 Tm (°F): 

### 75 Ts-50° 327.92 Ts+50° 427.92
Barometric: 29.30 **in Hg** Y: 1.012 Est. Qs: 0.644 **cfm** Est. Qs: 0.667 Est. Qs: 

### 0.691 Static Press: -0.30 **in H 2**  

### O ∆ H@: 0.38 **in H 2**  

### O Est. μ s 

### : 237.66 **mpoise** 

### Est. μ s 

### : 226.46 Est. μ s 

### : 248.63 Stack Press: 29.28 **in Hg** Cp': 0.804 S/N T3-8-1 Est. ∆ H: 0.091 **("H 2**  

### O) Est. ∆ H: 0.103 Est. ∆ H: 

### 0.081 %CO 2 

### : 0.90 **%** Cp: 0.804 S/N T3-8-1 %O 2 

### : 19.40 **%** Nozzle Dia: 0.211 **inches** DGM initial **cf**
%N 2 

### /CO: 79.70 **%** Stack Area: 7.069 **ft 2**  

### DGM final **cf**
M d 

### : 28.92 **lb/lb-mole** 

### # of Points: 12 **points** Time **min.** Est. M w 

### : 27.94 **lb/lb-mole** 

### 240.25 **min** Leak Rate **cfm** T std 

### : 528 **°R** P std 

### : 29.92 **in Hg** Vacuum **in. Hg**

Pitot Pump

∆ P Vac. Imp. ("H 2 

### O) Inlet Outlet Stack Ideal Actual (in Hg) Probe Filter Exit
**1 20.73 0.440 69.0 68.0 376 0.090 0.380 5 250 251 73 0.686 9.91 2.31** 
**2 21.20 0.460 71.0 69.0 378 0.090 0.380 5 250 250 52 0.642 10.40 2.51**
**3 21.20 0.460 73.0 71.0 379 0.090 0.380 6 250 251 350 0.681 9.99 2.34**
**4 20.25 0.420 73.0 72.0 379 0.090 0.380 6 250 250 50 0.751 9.32** 2.07
**5 19.01 0.370 74.0 73.0 352 0.090 0.380 6 250 251 55 0.776** 8.88 1.89
**6 18.49 0.350 74.0 74.0 351 0.097 0.380 6 250 250 57 0.775** 8.88 1.89
**7 17.40 0.310 72.0 73.0 364 0.097 0.380 5 250 251 76 0.696 9.70** 2.21
**8 17.68 0.320 73.0 73.0 365 0.094 0.380 5 250 251 53 0.753 9.18** 2.01
**9 20.73 0.440 73.0 73.0 371 0.094 0.380 5 250 250 55 0.627 10.52 2.55**
**10 21.20 0.460 75.0 74.0 378 0.092 0.380 5 251 251 56 0.691 9.88 2.29**
**11 20.96 0.450 76.0 74.0 382 0.091 0.380 6 250 249 56 0.810** 8.86 1.90
**12 21.20 0.460 77.0 75.0 382 0.090 0.380 6 250 249 55 0.702 9.80 2.27**
**13 - 0.090** 

**-** - **#VALUE!** 

### Final DGM:

Max

532.5 °R 831.1 °R Vac.

240.05 min 98.67 cf 0.412 72.9 °F 371.4 °F 6 0.380 in H 2 

### O fps



### Test Personnel (signature/date) Project Leader (signature/date) ∆ H (in H 2 

### 0) +/- 50°F ∆ H 

## EQUIPMENT

49-5 ESTIMATES

Orifice Press. 9 0.001 0.004

D 50

[10 μ m]



### 901.280 **893.060** Run Time:

DGM Gas Temperatures (°F) 

### 15 0
0.001

Gas Temps

1 1

**949.340**
**957.730**
**967.410**
**975.920** 18-Aug-2010SamplePoint Dwell Time (min)



### 877.255 

## STACK DATA

Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft 3 

### ) OWENS

Qs (acfm) (°F)

**885.330**

**941.860**

T s (avg) 

### 909.940
**918.640**
**927.113**
**934.140**

**975.920**

Actual Run Time 

## V m 

### ∆Η (avg)

44.346



## V s (avg) 

### T m (avg) 

### D 50 [2.5

μ m]



### in H 2 

### O 

## ∆ P (avg) 3
10-286A



## LEAK CHECKS
0 7:31 AM
12:12 PM

0.004

**Copyright 2006 by Environmental Supply Company, Inc.**BT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-286AProbe #T4-E-7PollutantPM/METALSPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyOWENSDGM #T4-2Method29Total Points1216:02 19:1415/0.000 8.5/0.000LocationWAXAHACHIE, TXRate (cfm)0.734Run #1Time/pt (min)15.0SourceV-1 DEP STACKDelta ∆H@1.625Date8/18/10Time/reading5.0OperatorGILLENBws (%)9.33# of Ports2Total Run180.0Filter Number Condensate Volume244.5Cp0.812Ps (in Hg)29.21Barometric29.24Silica Gel Weight Gain26.2DGM Y0.982Pm (in Hg)29.33Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.35Actual Dn (in)0.316O2 (%)20Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.00An (ft^2)0.00054CO2 (%)0.8Md28.93Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O)1.25Ms27.91Act. Flow (cfm)16,417Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 124.64Preliminary dP (in H20)0.32Total Vol.(cf)132.1Wet Ref Flow (cfm)10,038Moisture % 9.27Preliminary Ts (oF)385Est. Us (ft/s)40.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)9,102Preliminary Tm (oF)75Theor Dn (in)0.3160Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 16:02650.76 0.24 380 72 711.171.3 247 71 2.515.0 10.0 16:07654.23 0.25 382 72 721.221.35 246 51 2.5110.0 15.0 16:12657.59 0.24 382 74 721.171.3 245 49 2.5215.0 20.0 16:17660.92 0.28 385 74 721.371.5 245 49 2.5220.0 25.0 16:22664.41 0.31 385 76 721.511.7 245 52 2.5225.0 30.0 16:27668.22 0.30 385 76 721.461.6 245 51 2.5330.0 35.0 16:32671.98 0.29 385 77 731.421.6 245 52 2.5335.0 40.0 16:37675.64 0.30 385 78 731.461.6 245 55 2.5340.0 45.0 16:42679.52 0.30 385 78 731.461.6 246 54 2.5445.0 50.0 16:47683.14 0.32 385 78 741.561.7 245 55 3450.0 55.0 16:52686.12 0.32 385 79 741.561.7 245 56 3455.0 60.0 16:57691.01 0.31 386 79 741.511.7 245 59 3560.0 65.0 17:02695.31 0.33 385 79 741.611.8 245 59 3565.0 70.0 17:07698.61 0.33 385 79 741.611.8 245 56 3570.0 75.0 17:12702.38 0.33 385 79 741.611.8 245 57 3675.0 80.0 17:17706.18 0.33 385 79 741.611.8 246 56 3680.0 85.0 17:22710.18 0.26 382 80 751.271.4 246 57 3685.0 90.0 17:27714.11 0.26 382 80 751.271.4 245 57 3190.0 95.0 17:44717.34 0.34 384 77 751.661.8 242 68 3195.0 100.0 17:49721.32 0.34 384 78 751.661.8 245 55 31100.0 105.0 17:54725.26 0.34 384 79 751.661.8 245 55 32105.0 110.0 17:59728.92 0.34 384 80 751.661.8 246 54 32110.0 115.0 18:04732.78 0.35 384 80 761.711.9 246 55 32115.0 120.0 18:09736.92 0.35 383 80 761.711.9 245 56 33120.0 125.0 18:14740.22 0.35 383 80 761.711.9 246 56 33125.0 130.0 18:19744.30 0.34 383 80 761.661.8 245 56 33130.0 135.0 18:24748.63 0.34 383 80 761.661.8 244 57 34135.0 140.0 18:29752.38 0.34 383 80 761.661.8 245 58 34140.0 145.0 18:34755.82 0.30 382 80 761.461.6 245 61 34145.0 150.0 18:39758.92 0.31 382 79 761.511.7 244 62 35150.0 155.0 18:44761.49 0.31 381 79 761.511.7 244 64 35155.0 160.0 18:49765.42 0.26 381 80 761.271.4 245 65 35160.0 165.0 18:54768.64 0.27 381 80 761.321.4 243 62 36165.0 170.0 18:59772.01 0.23 381 81 761.121.25 243 61 36170.0 175.0 19:04775.12 0.23 378 80 761.121.25 244 55 36175.0 180.0 19:09778.56 0.23 378 80 761.121.25 243 56 3180.0 19:14782.836Average:132.070.30 383.1 78.4 74.51.471.63 245 #DIV/0! 57 3Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-286AProbe #T4-E-7PollutantPM/METALSPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyOWENSDGM #T4-2Method29Total Points127:00 10:0815.0/0.000 8.5/0.002LocationWAXAHACHIE, TXRate (cfm)0.736Run #2Time/pt (min)15.0SourceV-1 DEP STACKDelta ∆H@1.657Date8/19/10Time/reading5.0OperatorGILLENBws (%)9.54# of Ports2Total Run180.0Filter Number Condensate Volume257.4Cp0.812Ps (in Hg)29.25Barometric29.27Silica Gel Weight Gain30.6DGM Y0.982Pm (in Hg)29.36Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.3Actual Dn (in)0.316O2 (%)19.3Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.00An (ft^2)0.00054CO2 (%)0.9Md28.92Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O)1.25Ms27.87Act. Flow (cfm)16,499Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 126.68Preliminary dP (in H20)0.32Total Vol.(cf)132.5Wet Ref Flow (cfm)10,150Moisture % 9.67Preliminary Ts (oF)385Est. Us (ft/s)40.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)9,182Preliminary Tm (oF)75Theor Dn (in)0.3164Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 7:00785.08 0.27 378 65 651.331.45 246 61 2.515.0 10.0 7:05788.72 0.26 378 66 651.281.4 247 53 2.5110.0 15.0 7:10792.01 0.26 378 67 651.281.4 245 53 2.5215.0 20.0 7:15795.62 0.28 379 68 661.381.5 245 62 2.5220.0 25.0 7:20799.41 0.29 379 69 661.431.6 245 61 2.5225.0 30.0 7:25802.63 0.29 379 69 661.431.6 245 60 2.5330.0 35.0 7:30806.24 0.31 379 69 661.531.7 245 60 2.5335.0 40.0 7:35809.99 0.31 380 70 671.531.7 246 60 2.5340.0 45.0 7:40813.69 0.31 380 70 671.531.7 245 60 2.5445.0 50.0 7:45817.49 0.33 380 71 671.621.8 245 61 3450.0 55.0 7:50821.24 0.34 381 72 681.671.85 244 62 3455.0 60.0 7:55825.04 0.34 381 72 681.671.85 244 63 3560.0 65.0 8:00829.26 0.36 380 72 681.771.95 243 61 3565.0 70.0 8:05833.09 0.36 380 73 691.771.95 243 62 3570.0 75.0 8:10836.83 0.36 381 73 691.771.95 243 64 3675.0 80.0 8:15841.12 0.33 380 73 691.621.8 246 62 3680.0 85.0 8:20845.14 0.34 379 73 691.671.85 246 62 3685.0 90.0 8:25848.51 0.34 379 73 691.671.85 245 62 3190.0 95.0 8:38852.578 0.27 377 71 691.331.45 244 63 2.5195.0 100.0 8:43855.92 0.27 378 71 691.331.45 245 64 31100.0 105.0 8:48859.12 0.27 378 71 691.331.45 244 62 32105.0 110.0 8:53863.02 0.28 377 71 691.381.5 245 62 32110.0 115.0 8:58866.68 0.29 378 72 691.431.6 246 61 32115.0 120.0 9:03869.82 0.29 379 72 691.431.6 247 63 33120.0 125.0 9:08873.49 0.28 378 73 691.381.5 246 61 33125.0 130.0 9:13877.09 0.28 379 73 701.381.5 246 62 33130.0 135.0 9:18880.59 0.28 379 74 701.381.5 245 61 34135.0 140.0 9:23884.12 0.31 379 74 701.531.7 246 63 34140.0 145.0 9:28887.72 0.31 379 74 701.531.7 247 63 34145.0 150.0 9:33891.42 0.31 379 74 701.531.7 245 63 35150.0 155.0 9:38895.23 0.30 379 74 701.481.6 244 62 35155.0 160.0 9:43899.28 0.32 379 74 711.581.7 245 61 35160.0 165.0 9:48902.74 0.32 379 74 711.581.7 244 60 36165.0 170.0 9:53906.72 0.32 379 74 711.581.7 245 63 36170.0 175.0 9:58910.38 0.31 379 75 711.531.7 246 62 36175.0 180.0 10:03913.81 0.32 378 75 711.581.7 245 63 3180.0 10:08917.576Average:132.500.31 379.0 71.7 68.51.511.66 245.1 #DIV/0! 61.3 3Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-286AProbe #T4-E-7PollutantPM/METALSPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyOWENSDGM #T4-2Method29Total Points1210:53 15:0015.0/0.000 7.5/0.000LocationWAXAHACHIE, TXRate (cfm)0.766Run #3Time/pt (min)15.0SourceV-1 DEP STACKDelta ∆H@1.86Date19-Aug-10Time/reading5.0OperatorGILLENBws (%)9.55# of Ports2Total Run180.0Filter Number Condensate Volume261.9Cp0.812Ps (in Hg)29.25Barometric29.27Silica Gel Weight Gain29.2DGM Y0.982Pm (in Hg)29.36Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.3Actual Dn (in)0.316O2 (%)19.3Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.00An (ft^2)0.00054CO2 (%)0.9Md28.92Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O)1.25Ms27.87Act. Flow (cfm)17,585Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 130.05Preliminary dP (in H20)0.32Total Vol.(cf)137.9Wet Ref Flow (cfm)10,782Moisture % 9.53Preliminary Ts (oF)385Est. Us (ft/s)40.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)9,753Preliminary Tm (oF)75Theor Dn (in)0.3164Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 10:53918.88 0.33 382 70 701.841.7 238 67 2.515.0 10.0 10:58921.62 0.33 382 71 701.841.7 231 65 2.5110.0 15.0 11:03925.42 0.33 382 72 701.841.7 245 63 2.5215.0 20.0 11:08929.03 0.35 381 73 701.951.9 244 63 3220.0 25.0 11:13932.92 0.35 382 74 701.951.9 242 63 3225.0 30.0 11:18937.21 0.35 382 75 711.951.9 244 62 3330.0 35.0 11:23940.51 0.35 382 76 711.951.9 245 65 3335.0 40.0 11:28944.73 0.35 382 77 721.951.9 245 65 3340.0 45.0 11:33948.63 0.35 382 77 721.951.9 245 65 3445.0 50.0 11:38951.38 0.35 382 77 721.951.9 245 65 3450.0 55.0 11:43956.63 0.35 381 77 721.951.9 246 64 3455.0 60.0 11:48961.14 0.33 381 78 731.841.75 245 66 3560.0 65.0 11:53963.56 0.35 382 78 731.951.9 246 66 3565.0 70.0 11:58967.62 0.38 382 79 732.122.05 245 64 3570.0 75.0 12:03971.43 0.37 382 80 742.062 245 65 3675.0 80.0 12:08975.72 0.37 381 81 752.062 245 63 3680.0 85.0 12:13980.42 0.36 381 81 752.011.95 244 64 3685.0 90.0 12:18984.85 0.37 381 81 752.062 242 62 3190.0 95.0 12:30988.462 0.28 381 79 761.561.5 245 61 2.5195.0 100.0 12:35992.02 0.28 381 79 761.561.5 242 60 2.51100.0 105.0 12:40995.92 0.28 381 80 761.561.5 245 62 2.52105.0 110.0 12:45998.61 0.33 381 80 761.841.8 246 61 32110.0 115.0 12:501002.98 0.33 382 81 761.841.8 247 62 32115.0 120.0 12:551006.62 0.33 382 82 771.841.8 246 61 33120.0 125.0 13:001010.21 0.32 382 82 771.781.7 245 60 33125.0 130.0 13:051014.12 0.33 382 82 771.841.8 244 61 33130.0 135.0 13:101017.72 0.33 382 83 771.841.8 244 60 34135.0 140.0 13:151022.61 0.32 382 83 781.781.7 244 61 34140.0 145.0 13:201025.62 0.35 383 83 781.951.9 245 63 34145.0 150.0 13:251029.68 0.36 382 83 782.011.95 245 64 35150.0 155.0 14:301034.12 0.38 382 84 792.122.05 246 65 35155.0 160.0 14:351037.55 0.38 383 84 792.122.05 245 64 35160.0 165.0 14:401041.45 0.38 382 84 792.122.05 245 63 36165.0 170.0 14:451045.63 0.39 383 85 792.182.1 245 64 36170.0 175.0 14:501049.87 0.38 381 84 802.122.05 245 64 36175.0 180.0 14:551053.48 0.39 382 85 802.182.1 246 63 3180.0 185.0 15:001056.714Average:137.830.35 381.8 79.4 74.91.931.86 244.2 #DIV/0! 63.2222222 2.9Leak CheckBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-286A-OH Probe # HG PROBE Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1CompanyOWENS CORNINGDGM # 15 AND 18 Method 30B Total Points0LocationWAXAHACHIE, TXRate (L/m)1 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) N/ASource V-1 Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 21-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator PILGRIMBws (%)8.96 # of Ports Total Run120.0Filter Number Condensate Volume N/ACpN/APs (in Hg)29.39Barometric29.39 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y1.000/1.002Pm (in Hg)29.39Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2)7.06858CO2 (%) Md28.00Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O) Ms27.10Act. Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)120.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempA B A B A B A B A B A B A B2:45:00 PM 0.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 0.00 0 90 962:50:00 PM 5.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 5.01 5.02 90 962:55:00 PM 10.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 10.11 10 90 963:00:00 PM 15.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 15.01 15.15 90 963:05:00 PM 20.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 19.53 19.89 90 963:10:00 PM 25.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 25.51 24.91 90 963:15:00 PM 30.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 31.22 29.99 90 963:20:00 PM 35.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 35.61 34.89 91 963:25:00 PM 40.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 40.62 40.11 92 973:30:00 PM 45.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 44.72 45.22 94 983:35:00 PM 50.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 49.41 51.33 93 993:40:00 PM 55.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 55.09 55.42 93 1003:45:00 PM 60.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 60.23 59.52 91 993:50:00 PM 65.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 65.41 64.48 91 1003:55:00 PM 70.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 70.26 70.51 92 1004:00:00 PM 75.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 75.71 74.48 91 1004:05:00 PM 80.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 81.44 79.94 91 1004:10:00 PM 85.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 86.21 85.1 90 1014:15:00 PM 90.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 91.05 90.51 90 1014:20:00 PM 95.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 95.45 95.28 90 1024:25:00 PM 100.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 100.14 100.11 90 1014:30:00 PM 105.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 105.04 105.18 89 1014:35:00 PM 110.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 109.78 110 89 1014:40:00 PM 115.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 114.89 115.05 90 1024:45:00 PM 120.0120.094 120.018Average 120.0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!90.70833333 98.75Volume120.094 120.0180 0dscm0.11 0.110.00 0.00Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post Test Pre Test Post Test22.0"@0.000 6.0"@0.000 20.0"@0.000 7.0"@0.000Condenser Filter Temp(*F)Trap/ Probe TempBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-286A-OH Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1CompanyOWENS CORNINGDGM # 15 AND 18 Method 30B Total Points0LocationWAXAHACHIE, TXRate (L/m)1 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) N/ASource V-1 Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 22-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator PILGRIMBws (%)9.67 # of Ports Total Run120.0Filter Number Condensate Volume N/ACpN/APs (in Hg)29.33Barometric29.33 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y1.000/1.002Pm (in Hg)29.33Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2)7.06858CO2 (%) Md28.00Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O) Ms27.03Act. Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)120.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempA B A B A B A B A B A B A B8:20:00 AM 0.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 124.907 124.218 72 738:25:00 AM 5.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 130.27 130.5 72 738:30:00 AM 10.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 135.01 133.82 72 738:35:00 AM 15.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 139.36 138.75 72 738:40:00 AM 20.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 144.21 143.99 72 748:45:00 AM 25.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 150.12 149.21 72 748:50:00 AM 30.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 154.72 155.92 73 748:55:00 AM 35.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 158.31 158.16 72 759:00:00 AM 40.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 164.32 163.99 73 759:05:00 AM 45.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 168.65 168.43 73 759:10:00 AM 50.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 173.63 173.58 73 759:15:00 AM 55.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 179.98 178.69 73 759:20:00 AM 60.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 184.02 184.52 73 769:25:00 AM 65.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 188.48 189.24 73 759:30:00 AM 70.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 194.31 194.82 73 769:35:00 AM 75.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 198.23 199.28 73 769:40:00 AM 80.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 203.18 205.14 73 769:45:00 AM 85.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 208.52 210.19 74 769:50:00 AM 90.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 213.26 214.9 74 779:55:00 AM 95.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 218.68 220.31 74 7710:00:00 AM 100.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 224.40 225.52 75 7710:05:00 AM 105.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 229.81 230.81 75 7810:10:00 AM 110.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 235.57 235.22 76 7810:15:00 AM 115.00.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 240.62 240.32 77 7910:20:00 AM 120.0245.102 245.104Average 120.0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!73.29166667 75.42Volume120.195 120.8860 0dscm0.12 0.120.00 0.00Trap/ Probe Temp23.0"@0.000Pre Test Post Test22.0"@0.000 6.0"@0.0006.0"@0.000Condenser Filter Temp(*F)Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post TestBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-286A-OH Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1CompanyOWENS CORNINGDGM # 15 AND 18 Method 30B Total Points0LocationWAXAHACHIE, TXRate (L/m)1 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) N/ASource V-1 Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 22-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator PILGRIMBws (%)9.58 # of Ports Total Run120.0Filter Number Condensate Volume N/ACpN/APs (in Hg)29.35Barometric29.35 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y1.000/1.002Pm (in Hg)29.35Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2)7.06858CO2 (%) Md28.00Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O) Ms27.04Act. Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)120.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#REF!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempA B A B A B A B A B A B A B10:35:00 AM 0.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 247.471 247.143 77 7910:10:00 AM 5.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 252.29 252.26 77 7910:45:00 AM 10.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 256.84 257.21 77 7911:45:00 AM 15.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 262.09 262.059 80 8111:50:00 AM 20.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 267.57 268.00 80 8111:55:00 AM 25.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 272.45 273.14 80 8212:00:00 PM 30.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 277.82 278.22 80 8212:05:00 PM 35.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 283.08 283.38 80 8212:10:00 PM 40.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 287.68 287.41 81 8312:15:00 PM 45.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 293.35 293.09 81 8412:20:00 PM 50.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 299.15 298.99 81 8412:25:00 PM 55.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 303.33 303.23 81 8412:30:00 PM 60.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 308.08 308.14 81 8412:35:00 PM 65.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 313.03 313.23 80 8412:40:00 PM 70.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 318.16 318.63 80 8312:45:00 PM 75.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 323.23 323.95 81 8312:50:00 PM 80.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 327.82 328.76 82 8412:55:00 PM 85.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 332.92 333.74 82 841:00:00 PM 90.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 338.76 339.13 81 841:05:00 PM 95.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 344.06 343.92 83 851:10:00 PM 100.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 348.89 348.92 84 851:15:00 PM 105.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 353.98 353.87 85 861:20:00 PM 110.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 357.82 357.61 84 861:25:00 PM 115.00.8 1.1 2.0 4.0 362.29 362.58 84 871:30:00 PM 120.0367.947 367.883Average 120.0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!80.91666667 83.13Volume120.476 120.7400 0dscm0.12 0.120.00 0.00Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post Test Pre Test Post Test22.0"@0.000 6.5"@0.000 24.0"@0.000 8.0"@0.000Condenser Filter Temp(*F)Trap/ Probe TempBT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A Probe # ACP-8 Pollutant CR+6 Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post Company OWENS DGM # 49-5 Method 61 Total Points 12 16:02 19:14 15.0/0.000 9.5/0.004 Location WAXAHACHIE, TX Rate (cfm) 0.669 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 15.0 Source V-1 DEP STACK Delta ∆H@ 1.373 Date 18-Aug-10 Time/reading 5.0 Operator LEE Bws (%) 8.90 # of Ports 2 Total Run 180.0 Filter Number Condensate Volume 213.4 Cp 0.833 Ps (in Hg) 29.21 Barometric 29.24 Silica Gel Weight Gain 35.2 DGM Y 1.012 Pm (in Hg) 29.33 Ref Temp 68 Static (in H2O) -0.35 Actual Dn (in) 0.304 O2 (%) 20 Ref Press 29.92 Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00050 CO2 (%) 0.8 Md 28.93 Stack Area (sf) 7.07 Est.DH(in H2O) 1.25 Ms 27.96 Act. Flow (cfm) 16,222 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column Vmnstd 119.74 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.32 Total Vol.(cf) 120.4 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 9,929 Moisture % 8.90 Preliminary Ts (oF) 385 Est. Us (ft/s) 41.2 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 9,046 Preliminary Tm (oF) 75 Theor Dn (in) 0.3107 Comments: " Data Entry Cells "
"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch "

PT # Start Time End Time Clock Time (24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out Desired Delta H Actual

Delta H Probe Temp.

(*F) Filter Temp

(*F) Imp temp.

(*F) Pump Vac.
1 0.0 5.0 16:02 976.57 0.35 384 72 72 1.32 1.75 251 78 5 1 5.0 10.0 16:07 980.32 0.33 385 73 73 1.24 1.65 204 68 5 1 10.0 15.0 16:12 983.97 0.33 385 76 73 1.24 1.65 166 66 5 2 15.0 20.0 16:17 987.58 0.36 385 77 73 1.35 1.75 146 66 5 2 20.0 25.0 16:22 991.36 0.37 384 77 73 1.39 1.8 138 65 5 2 25.0 30.0 16:27 995.18 0.37 384 78 74 1.39 1.8 134 65 5 3 30.0 35.0 16:32 999.01 0.31 384 78 74 1.17 1.5 138 59 5 3 35.0 40.0 16:37 1002.52 0.31 384 78 74 1.17 1.5 136 59 5 3 40.0 45.0 16:42 1006.02 0.30 384 78 74 1.13 1.45 135 59 4.5 4 45.0 50.0 16:47 1009.47 0.30 384 79 75 1.13 1.45 135 60 4.5 4 50.0 55.0 16:52 1012.93 0.30 384 79 75 1.13 1.45 128 60 4.5 4 55.0 60.0 16:57 1016.38 0.30 384 79 75 1.13 1.45 121 61 4.5 5 60.0 65.0 17:02 1019.84 0.24 384 79 76 0.90 1.15 109 61 4.5 5 65.0 70.0 17:07 1022.94 0.24 384 79 76 0.90 1.15 106 61 4 5 70.0 75.0 17:12 1026.03 0.24 384 79 76 0.90 1.15 106 61 4 6 75.0 80.0 17:17 1029.13 0.22 385 79 76 0.83 1.05 107 61 4 6 80.0 85.0 17:22 1032.10 0.22 387 79 76 0.83 1.05 109 60 4 6 85.0 90.0 17:27 1035.06 0.22 387 79 76 0.83 1.05 110 80 4 1 90.0 95.0 17:44 1038.096 0.25 380 77 76 0.94 1.2 99 62 4 1 95.0 100.0 17:49 1041.26 0.25 381 78 76 0.94 1.2 96 62 6 1 100.0 105.0 17:54 1044.42 0.25 381 80 77 0.94 1.2 95 62 6 2 105.0 110.0 17:59 1050.43 0.20 381 80 77 0.75 0.98 95 61 6 2 110.0 115.0 18:04 1053.26 0.20 380 81 77 0.75 0.98 94 60 6 2 115.0 120.0 18:09 1056.1 0.20 380 80 77 0.75 0.98 93 60 5 3 120.0 125.0 18:14 1058.93 0.20 378 80 77 0.75 0.98 93 60 5 3 125.0 130.0 18:19 1061.77 0.20 378 80 77 0.75 0.98 97 61 5 3 130.0 135.0 18:24 1064.60 0.20 376 79 78 0.75 0.98 99 61 5 4 135.0 140.0 18:29 1067.44 0.26 380 79 78 0.98 1.25 100 62 5 4 140.0 145.0 18:34 1070.67 0.28 380 80 78 1.05 1.35 100 63 5 4 145.0 150.0 18:39 1074.03 0.28 380 80 78 1.05 1.35 100 64 6 5 150.0 155.0 18:44 1077.38 0.34 381 80 78 1.28 1.65 101 64 6 5 155.0 160.0 18:49 1081.08 0.34 381 81 78 1.28 1.65 102 65 6 5 160.0 165.0 18:54 1084.77 0.34 381 81 78 1.28 1.65 103 64 6 6 165.0 170.0 18:59 1088.47 0.36 381 81 78 1.35 1.75 104 64 6 6 170.0 175.0 19:04 1092.28 0.36 380 81 78 1.35 1.75 104 64 6 6 175.0 180.0 19:09 1096.09 0.36 380 81 78 1.35 1.75 103 64 6

180.0 19:14 1099.903

Average: 123.33 0.28 382.3 78.8 76.0 1.06 1.37 118 #DIV/0! 63.1388889 5 Leak CheckBT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A Probe # ACP-8 Pollutant CR+6 Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post Company OWENS DGM # 49-5 Method 61 Total Points 12 7:00 10:08 15.0/0.007 8.08/0.000 Location WAXAHACHIE, TX Rate (cfm) 0.681 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 15.0 Source V-1 DEP STACK Delta ∆H@ 1.286 Date 19-Aug-10 Time/reading 5.0 Operator LEE Bws (%) 10.09 # of Ports 2 Total Run 180.0 Filter Number Condensate Volume 260 Cp 0.833 Ps (in Hg) 29.25 Barometric 29.27 Silica Gel Weight Gain 30.6 DGM Y 1.012 Pm (in Hg) 29.36 Ref Temp 68 Static (in H2O) -0.3 Actual Dn (in) 0.304 O2 (%) 19.3 Ref Press 29.92 Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00050 CO2 (%) 0.9 Md 28.92 Stack Area (sf) 7.07 Est.DH(in H2O) 1.25 Ms 27.81 Act. Flow (cfm) 17,040 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column Vmnstd 121.93 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.32 Total Vol.(cf) 122.6 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 10,920 Moisture % 10.09 Preliminary Ts (oF) 385 Est. Us (ft/s) 41.2 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 9,818 Preliminary Tm (oF) 75 Theor Dn (in) 0.3124 Comments: " Data Entry Cells "
"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch "

PT # Start Time End Time Clock Time (24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out Desired Delta H Actual

Delta H Probe Temp.

(*F) Filter Temp

(*F) Imp temp.

(*F) Pump Vac.
1 0.0 5.0 7:00 100.63 0.35 378 66 66 1.24 1.35 80 67 5 1 5.0 10.0 7:05 104.4 0.35 378 66 66 1.24 1.35 94 53 5 1 10.0 15.0 7:10 107.65 0.34 379 67 66 1.21 1.3 98 49 5 2 15.0 20.0 7:15 111.15 0.36 379 68 66 1.28 1.4 101 48 5 2 20.0 25.0 7:20 114.73 0.37 379 68 67 1.32 1.45 102 49 5 2 25.0 30.0 7:25 118.35 0.36 379 69 67 1.28 1.4 105 49 5 3 30.0 35.0 7:30 121.96 0.35 379 70 67 1.24 1.35 109 49 5 3 35.0 40.0 7:35 125.48 0.33 379 70 67 1.17 1.25 110 49 5 3 40.0 45.0 7:40 128.86 0.34 379 70 68 1.21 1.3 111 49 5 4 45.0 50.0 7:45 132.39 0.33 379 71 68 1.17 1.25 110 50 5 4 50.0 55.0 7:50 135.72 0.33 378 71 68 1.17 1.25 110 51 5 4 55.0 60.0 7:55 139.1 0.33 379 71 68 1.17 1.25 112 51 5 5 60.0 65.0 8:00 142.5 0.30 379 72 69 1.07 1.15 111 52 4.5 5 65.0 70.0 8:05 145.72 0.30 304 72 69 1.07 1.15 110 53 4.5 5 70.0 75.0 8:10 148.91 0.30 294 72 69 1.07 1.15 109 54 4.5 6 75.0 80.0 8:15 152.08 0.25 147 72 69 0.89 0.97 108 53 4 6 80.0 85.0 8:20 154.85 0.25 122 72 70 0.89 0.97 104 55 4 6 85.0 90.0 8:25 157.86 0.25 114 72 70 0.89 0.97 102 55 4 1 90.0 95.0 8:38 160.981 0.36 369 71 70 1.28 1.5 88 62 5.5 1 95.0 100.0 8:43 164.71 0.35 378 71 70 1.24 1.45 95 51 5.5 1 100.0 105.0 8:48 168.36 0.35 378 71 70 1.24 1.45 101 52 5.5 2 105.0 110.0 8:53 172.02 0.37 378 71 70 1.32 1.55 103 54 6 2 110.0 115.0 8:58 175.7 0.38 378 72 70 1.35 1.55 105 55 6 2 115.0 120.0 9:03 179.42 0.38 378 72 70 1.35 1.55 107 57 6 3 120.0 125.0 9:08 183.11 0.36 378 73 70 1.28 1.5 110 58 6 3 125.0 130.0 9:13 186.85 0.36 377 73 71 1.28 1.5 111 60 6 3 130.0 135.0 9:18 190.59 0.36 377 73 71 1.28 1.5 112 61 6 4 135.0 140.0 9:23 194.28 0.32 377 73 71 1.14 1.3 115 62 5.5 4 140.0 145.0 9:28 197.83 0.32 376 73 71 1.14 1.3 114 63 5.5 4 145.0 150.0 9:33 201.42 0.32 375 74 71 1.14 1.3 109 63 5.5 5 150.0 155.0 9:38 204.95 0.27 344 74 71 0.96 1.1 109 62 5 5 155.0 160.0 9:43 208.2 0.26 332 73 71 0.92 1.1 108 62 5 5 160.0 165.0 9:48 211.45 0.26 334 73 71 0.92 1.1 107 56 5 6 165.0 170.0 9:53 214.72 0.26 340 74 71 0.92 1.1 101 56 5 6 170.0 175.0 9:58 218.02 0.26 329 74 71 0.92 1.1 100 56 5 6 175.0 180.0 10:03 221.23 0.27 332 74 72 0.96 1.1 100 57 5

180.0 10:08 224.414

Average: 123.78 0.32 345.4 71.3 69.2 1.15 1.29 105.0 #DIV/0! 55.1 5 Leak CheckBT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A Probe # ACP-8 Pollutant CR+6 Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post Company OWENS DGM # 49-5 Method 61 Total Points 12 10:53 14:00 15.0/0.008 8.0/0.003 Location WAXAHACHIE, TX Rate (cfm) 0.669 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 15.0 Source V-1 DEP STACK Delta ∆H@ 1.373 Date 19-Aug-10 Time/reading 5.0 Operator LEE Bws (%) 8.90 # of Ports 2 Total Run 180.0 Filter Number Condensate Volume 240.5 Cp 0.833 Ps (in Hg) 29.25 Barometric 29.27 Silica Gel Weight Gain 15.3 DGM Y 1.012 Pm (in Hg) 29.36 Ref Temp 68 Static (in H2O) -0.3 Actual Dn (in) 0.304 O2 (%) 19.3 Ref Press 29.92 Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00050 CO2 (%) 0.9 Md 28.92 Stack Area (sf) 7.07 Est.DH(in H2O) 1.29 Ms 27.94 Act. Flow (cfm) 16,981 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column Vmnstd 120.73 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.32 Total Vol.(cf) 120.4 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 11,091 Moisture % 9.07 Preliminary Ts (oF) 345 Est. Us (ft/s) 40.1 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 10,104 Preliminary Tm (oF) 70 Theor Dn (in) 0.3087 Comments: " Data Entry Cells "
"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch "

PT # Start Time End Time Clock Time (24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out Desired Delta H Actual

Delta H Probe Temp.

(*F) Filter Temp

(*F) Imp temp.

(*F) Pump Vac.
1 0.0 5.0 10:53 234.72 0.34 381 71 71 1.36 1.35 93 81 4 1 5.0 10.0 10:58 238.21 0.33 381 72 71 1.32 1.3 92 63 4 1 10.0 15.0 11:03 241.7 0.37 381 72 71 1.48 1.5 93 57 4 2 15.0 20.0 11:08 245.25 0.38 381 74 71 1.52 1.5 101 52 4 2 20.0 25.0 11:13 248.59 0.39 381 75 72 1.56 1.55 104 56 4.5 2 25.0 30.0 11:18 252.19 0.40 381 75 72 1.60 1.6 104 58 4.5 3 30.0 35.0 11:23 255.79 0.38 381 75 72 1.52 1.5 104 58 4.5 3 35.0 40.0 11:28 259.47 0.38 381 76 72 1.52 1.5 103 60 4.5 3 40.0 45.0 11:33 263.18 0.38 381 76 72 1.52 1.5 105 60 4.5 4 45.0 50.0 11:38 266.87 0.34 380 76 73 1.36 1.35 104 61 4 4 50.0 55.0 11:43 270.32 0.34 379 76 73 1.36 1.35 105 61 4 4 55.0 60.0 11:48 273.8 0.34 379 77 73 1.36 1.35 105 61 4 5 60.0 65.0 11:53 277.25 0.27 347 77 73 1.08 1.1 105 62 3.5 5 65.0 70.0 11:58 280.5 0.27 332 78 74 1.08 1.1 104 63 3.5 5 70.0 75.0 12:03 283.75 0.27 327 78 74 1.08 1.1 104 65 3.5 6 75.0 80.0 12:08 287.15 0.22 164 79 74 0.88 0.88 105 66 3 6 80.0 85.0 12:13 289.92 0.25 175 79 75 1.00 1 104 63 3.5 6 85.0 90.0 12:18 293.02 0.25 183 79 75 1.00 1 106 61 3.5 1 90.0 95.0 12:30 296.208 0.33 376 77 75 1.32 1.3 102 72 5 1 95.0 100.0 12:35 299.77 0.33 381 78 76 1.32 1.3 103 61 5 1 100.0 105.0 12:40 303.04 0.32 381 78 76 1.28 1.3 104 62 5 2 105.0 110.0 12:45 306.56 0.36 381 79 76 1.44 1.45 107 62 6 2 110.0 115.0 12:50 310.2 0.37 381 80 76 1.48 1.5 107 66 6 2 115.0 120.0 12:55 313.86 0.37 381 80 77 1.48 1.5 107 65 6 3 120.0 125.0 13:00 317.45 0.37 381 81 77 1.48 1.5 107 63 6 3 125.0 130.0 13:05 321.17 0.37 381 81 77 1.48 1.5 108 65 6 3 130.0 135.0 13:10 324.83 0.36 380 81 77 1.44 1.45 108 63 6 4 135.0 140.0 13:15 328.47 0.36 380 82 78 1.44 1.45 108 66 6 4 140.0 145.0 13:20 332.13 0.35 380 82 78 1.40 1.4 108 68 6 4 145.0 150.0 13:25 335.77 0.34 381 82 78 1.36 1.35 109 67 6 5 150.0 155.0 13:30 339.3 0.34 335 83 78 1.36 1.35 107 62 6 5 155.0 160.0 13:35 342.8 0.29 231 83 79 1.16 1.15 107 63 5.5 5 160.0 165.0 13:40 346.11 0.29 230 83 79 1.16 1.15 107 63 5.5 6 165.0 170.0 13:45 349.44 0.25 175 83 79 1.00 1 107 64 5 6 170.0 175.0 13:50 352.54 0.24 120 83 79 0.96 0.96 105 66 5 6 175.0 180.0 13:55 355.36 0.25 138 83 80 1.00 1 106 67 5

180.0 14:00 358.79

Average: 124.07 0.33 330.2 78.4 75.1 1.31 1.31 104.4 #DIV/0! 63.1388889 4.8 Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-286AProbe #T4-E-7PollutantHCLPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyBTECDGM #52-3Method26ATotal Points129:37 10:4215.0/0.004 15.0/0.004LocationWAXAHACHIE, TXRate (cfm)0.665Run #1Time/pt (min)5.0SourceV-1 DEP STACKDelta ∆H@1.41Date8/18/10Time/reading5.0OperatorGILLENBws (%)9.21# of Ports2Total Run60.0Filter Number Condensate Volume72.7Cp0.812Ps (in Hg)29.28Barometric29.30Silica Gel Weight Gain14.2DGM Y0.982Pm (in Hg)29.43Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.3Actual Dn (in)0.304O2 (%)19.4Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.00An (ft^2)0.00050CO2 (%)0.9Md28.92Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O)1.80Ms27.91Act. Flow (cfm)16,881Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 39.80Preliminary dP (in H20)0.41Total Vol.(cf)39.9Wet Ref Flow (cfm)10,385Moisture % 9.32Preliminary Ts (oF)382Est. Us (ft/s)45.1Dry Ref Flow (cfm)9,429Preliminary Tm (oF)0Theor Dn (in)0.3200Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 9:37522.84 0.38 378 68 681.371.65 231 248 71 625.0 10.0 9:42526.62 0.37 379 69 691.341.6 243 244 66 6310.0 15.0 9:47530.52 0.37 380 70 691.341.6 245 247 65 6415.0 20.0 9:52533.71 0.31 380 71 691.121.35 245 246 64 6520.0 25.0 9:57537.41 0.25 379 72 690.901.1 244 245 65 5625.0 30.0 10:02540.54 0.19 379 73 700.690.83 245 246 63 4130.0 35.0 10:12543.19 0.37 380 72 701.341.6 247 247 64 5.5235.0 40.0 10:17547.31 0.38 380 73 701.371.65 247 247 63 5.5340.0 45.0 10:22550.39 0.38 381 73 701.371.65 246 246 64 5.5445.0 50.0 10:27554.31 0.34 381 74 711.231.5 248 247 65 5.5550.0 55.0 10:32557.96 0.30 381 74 711.081.3 248 247 65 5.5655.0 60.0 10:37560.42 0.24 380 74 710.871.05 243 244 63 560.0 10:42564.48Average:41.640.323 379.8 71.9 69.81.171.41 244 246 64.8333333 5Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-286AProbe #T4-E-7PollutantHCLPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyBTECDGM #52-3Method26ATotal Points1211:40 13:0515.0/0.000 8.0/0.000LocationWAXAHACHIE, TXRate (cfm)0.665Run #2Time/pt (min)5.0SourceV-1 DEP STACKDelta ∆H@1.4Date8/18/10Time/reading5.0OperatorGILLENBws (%)8.92# of Ports2Total Run60.0Filter Number Condensate Volume74.5Cp0.812Ps (in Hg)29.30Barometric29.32Silica Gel Weight Gain8.2DGM Y0.982Pm (in Hg)29.45Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.3Actual Dn (in)0.304O2 (%)19.4Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.00An (ft^2)0.00050CO2 (%)0.9Md28.92Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O)1.80Ms27.95Act. Flow (cfm)16,886Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 39.74Preliminary dP (in H20)0.41Total Vol.(cf)39.9Wet Ref Flow (cfm)10,332Moisture % 8.92Preliminary Ts (oF)382Est. Us (ft/s)45.2Dry Ref Flow (cfm)9,410Preliminary Tm (oF)0Theor Dn (in)0.3193Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 11:40564.67 0.35 381 73 721.261.50 248 247 68 325.0 10.0 11:45568.39 0.38 385 74 721.371.65 245 247 66 3310.0 15.0 11:50572.44 0.35 385 76 731.261.50 246 245 59 3415.0 20.0 11:55575.82 0.35 385 77 731.261.50 248 246 59 3520.0 25.0 12:00579.19 0.34 385 78 741.231.50 248 243 59 3625.0 30.0 12:05583.42 0.23 384 78 740.831.00 242 246 58 2.5130.0 35.0 12:10586.20 0.38 384 75 741.371.65 240 239 69 2.5235.0 40.0 12:40589.62 0.38 386 75 741.371.65 241 241 60 2.5340.0 45.0 12:45593.47 0.36 387 76 741.301.60 249 250 56 2445.0 50.0 12:50597.06 0.32 387 78 751.161.40 245 247 57 2550.0 55.0 12:55600.53 0.26 387 78 750.941.10 246 245 58 2655.0 60.0 13:00603.91 0.17 384 79 750.610.74 243 246 59 260.0 13:05606.55Average:41.880.32 385.0 76.4 73.81.171.40 245.1 245.2 60.7 3Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.:10-286AProbe #T4-E-7PollutantHCLPoints/Port6Start Finish Pre PostCompanyBTECDGM #52-3Method26ATotal Points1213:35 14:4515.0/0.000 7.5/0.000LocationWAXAHACHIE, TXRate (cfm)0.665Run #3Time/pt (min)5.0SourceV-1 DEP STACKDelta ∆H@1.42Date8/18/10Time/reading5.0OperatorGILLENBws (%)9.70# of Ports2Total Run60.0Filter Number Condensate Volume81.4Cp0.812Ps (in Hg)29.30Barometric29.32Silica Gel Weight Gain9.3DGM Y0.982Pm (in Hg)29.45Ref Temp68Static (in H2O)-0.3Actual Dn (in)0.304O2 (%)19.5Ref Press29.92Stack Dia (ft)3.00An (ft^2)0.00050CO2 (%)1.0Md28.94Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O)1.80Ms27.88Act. Flow (cfm)16,915Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 39.75Preliminary dP (in H20)0.41Total Vol.(cf)39.9Wet Ref Flow (cfm)10,379Moisture % 9.70Preliminary Ts (oF)382Est. Us (ft/s)45.2Dry Ref Flow (cfm)9,373Preliminary Tm (oF)0Theor Dn (in)0.3204Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.10.0 5.0 13:35608.35 0.39 386 76 751.411.7 241 242 64 5.525.0 10.0 13:40612.19 0.39 386 76 751.411.7 242 242 52 5.5310.0 15.0 13:45615.74 0.38 385 76 751.381.65 239 246 51 5.5415.0 20.0 13:50619.58 0.35 385 76 751.271.5 246 243 53 5520.0 25.0 13:55623.10 0.27 383 77 750.981.2 245 245 56 4.5625.0 30.0 14:00626.51 0.20 382 76 750.720.88 244 245 54 4130.0 35.0 14:15629.29 0.36 382 74 741.301.6 246 247 68 5.5235.0 40.0 14:20632.45 0.36 381 75 741.301.6 246 247 55 5.5340.0 45.0 14:25636.52 0.37 382 75 741.341.6 247 247 50 5.5445.0 50.0 14:30640.07 0.34 382 75 741.231.5 246 246 52 5.5550.0 55.0 14:35643.64 0.30 382 76 741.091.3 245 246 52 5.5655.0 60.0 14:40647.27 0.18 375 76 730.650.79 245 245 54 3.560.014:45650.24Average:41.890.32 382.6 75.7 74.41.171.42 244.3 245.1 55.0833333 5.1Leak CheckBT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A-OH Probe # 54-5-1 Pollutant FLOWS Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post Company OWENS CORNING DGM # T4-3 Method 4 Total Points 12 14:45 16:45 18.0/0.000 12.0/0.000 Location WAXAHACHIE, TX Rate (cfm) 0.418 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 5.0 Source V-1 Delta ∆H@ Date 21-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0 Operator LEE/PILGRIM Bws (%) 8.96 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0 Filter Number Condensate Volume 88.9 Cp 0.798 Ps (in Hg) 29.38 Barometric 29.39 Silica Gel Weight Gain 15.6 DGM Y 1.007 Pm (in Hg) 29.39 Ref Temp 68 Static (in H2O) -0.2 Actual Dn (in) O2 (%) 20.2 Ref Press 29.92 Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00000 CO2 (%) 0.9 Md 28.95 Stack Area (sf) 7.07 Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 27.97 Act. Flow (cfm) 16,218 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column Vmnstd 49.97 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 25.1 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 10,263 Moisture % 8.96 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 9,344 Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: " Data Entry Cells "
"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch "

PT # Start Time End Time Clock Time (24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out Desired Delta H Actual

Delta H Probe Temp.

(*F) Filter Temp

(*F) Imp temp.

(*F) Pump Vac.
1 0.0 5.0 14:45 822.750 0.32 355 73 74 0.00 0.60 252 249 82 2 2 5.0 10.0 14:50 825.04 0.35 360 73 74 0.00 0.60 251 250 67 2 3 10.0 15.0 14:55 828.01 0.36 363 76 74 0.00 0.60 250 250 65 2 4 15.0 20.0 15:00 830.16 0.35 363 76 74 0.00 0.60 250 249 64 2 5 20.0 25.0 15:05 831.92 0.31 359 76 74 0.00 0.60 251 250 64 2 6 25.0 30.0 15:10 833.84 0.24 350 76 74 0.00 0.60 249 250 63 2 1 30.0 35.0 15:15 835.580 0.30 356 76 75 0.00 0.60 251 250 63 2 2 35.0 40.0 15:20 838.26 0.34 360 76 75 0.00 0.60 249 250 63 2 3 40.0 45.0 15:25 839.83 0.35 362 77 75 0.00 0.60 249 249 64 2 4 45.0 50.0 15:30 842.28 0.35 364 78 75 0.00 0.60 251 249 64 2 5 50.0 55.0 15:35 843.88 0.31 366 78 75 0.00 0.60 250 250 62 2 6 55.0 60.0 15:40 846.13 0.22 352 79 76 0.00 0.60 249 250 61 2

60.0 65.0 15:45 848.40 0.31 78 76 0.60 250 251 61 2 65.0 70.0 15:50 856.61 0.35 78 76 0.60 251 250 61 2 70.0 75.0 15:55 853.01 0.35 78 75 0.60 251 250 60 2 75.0 80.0 16:00 854.92 0.35 78 75 0.60 250 251 60 2 80.0 85.0 16:05 856.91 0.32 78 75 0.60 250 250 61 2 85.0 90.0 16:10 858.94 0.22 78 75 0.60 249 251 61 2 90.0 95.0 16:15 862.97 0.31 77 74 0.60 249 248 62 2 95.0 100.0 16:20 863.82 0.34 77 74 0.60 249 247 62 2 100.0 105.0 16:25 865.47 0.36 76 73 0.60 250 250 62 2 105.0 110.0 16:30 867.87 0.35 76 73 0.60 250 252 63 2 110.0 115.0 16:35 869.76 0.30 75 72 0.60 251 250 64 2 115.0 120.0 16:40 872.13 0.23 75 71 0.60 250 251 64 2 END 120.0 120.0 16:45 874.011 Average: 51.261 0.32 359.2 76.6 74.3 0.00 0.60 250 250 63.4583333 2 Leak CheckBT Environmental Consulting Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A-OH Probe # 54-5-1 Pollutant FLOWS Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post Company OWENS CORNING DGM # T4-3 Method 4 Total Points 12 8:20 10:20 14.0/0.000 12.0/0.000 Location WAXAHACHIE, TX Rate (cfm) 0.417 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 5.0 Source V-1 Delta ∆H@ Date 22-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0 Operator LEE/PILGRIM Bws (%) 9.67 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0 Filter Number Condensate Volume 101.6 Cp 0.798 Ps (in Hg) 29.31 Barometric 29.33 Silica Gel Weight Gain 11.9 DGM Y 1.007 Pm (in Hg) 29.33 Ref Temp 68 Static (in H2O) -0.3 Actual Dn (in) O2 (%) 20.3 Ref Press 29.92 Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00000 CO2 (%) 1.1 Md 28.99 Stack Area (sf) 7.07 Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 27.93 Act. Flow (cfm) 15,839 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column Vmnstd 49.92 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 25.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 9,770 Moisture % 9.67 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 8,825 Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: " Data Entry Cells "
"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch "

PT # Start Time End Time Clock Time (24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out Desired Delta H Actual

Delta H Probe Temp.

(*F) Filter Temp

(*F) Imp temp.

(*F) Pump Vac.
1 0.0 5.0 8:20 874.750 0.31 364 64 64 0.00 0.60 250 253 64 2 2 5.0 10.0 8:25 877.04 0.35 371 64 65 0.00 0.60 250 251 63 2 3 10.0 15.0 8:30 879.50 0.34 379 65 65 0.00 0.60 249 250 62 2 4 15.0 20.0 8:35 881.12 0.32 382 66 65 0.00 0.60 250 252 61 2 5 20.0 25.0 8:40 883.04 0.28 380 66 65 0.00 0.60 250 251 61 2 6 25.0 30.0 8:45 885.13 0.22 377 67 65 0.00 0.60 250 249 60 2 1 30.0 35.0 8:50 887.320 0.28 380 67 65 0.00 0.60 250 249 60 2 2 35.0 40.0 8:55 889.25 0.33 382 68 65 0.00 0.60 250 250 59 2 3 40.0 45.0 9:00 891.29 0.33 384 68 65 0.00 0.60 250 249 59 2 4 45.0 50.0 9:05 893.56 0.30 383 69 66 0.00 0.60 250 249 59 2 5 50.0 55.0 9:10 895.76 0.25 382 69 66 0.00 0.60 250 249 59 2 6 55.0 60.0 9:15 897.79 0.22 378 70 66 0.00 0.60 250 250 59 2

60.0 65.0 9:20 899.94 0.32 70 66 0.60 250 249 59 2 65.0 70.0 9:25 902.28 0.35 71 67 0.60 250 249 60 2 70.0 75.0 9:30 904.11 0.35 72 67 0.60 250 252 60 2 75.0 80.0 9:35 906.39 0.33 72 67 0.60 250 249 61 2 80.0 85.0 9:40 908.76 0.30 72 68 0.60 251 251 61 2 85.0 90.0 9:45 911.02 0.20 72 68 0.60 250 250 62 2 90.0 95.0 9:50 913.49 0.30 72 68 0.60 250 251 62 2 95.0 100.0 9:55 915.12 0.33 72 68 0.60 249 250 63 2 100.0 105.0 10:00 916.87 0.34 73 68 0.60 249 250 63 2 105.0 110.0 10:05 918.92 0.35 73 68 0.60 251 250 63 2 110.0 115.0 10:10 921.33 0.30 73 68 0.60 250 251 64 2 115.0 120.0 10:15 923.02 0.19 73 68 0.60 249 251 64 2 END 120.0 120.0 10:20 925.355 Average: 50.605 0.30 378.5 69.5 66.4 0.00 0.60 250 250 61.1666667 2 Leak CheckBT Environmental Consulting Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-286A-OH Probe # 54-5-1 Pollutant FLOWS Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre Post Company OWENS CORNING DGM # T4-3 Method 4 Total Points 12 10:35 13:30 15.0/0.000 12.0/0.000 Location WAXAHACHIE, TX Rate (cfm) 0.419 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 5.0 Source V-1 Delta ∆H@ Date 22-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0 Operator LEE/PILGRIM Bws (%) 9.58 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0 Filter Number Condensate Volume 97.9 Cp 0.798 Ps (in Hg) 29.33 Barometric 29.35 Silica Gel Weight Gain 15 DGM Y 1.007 Pm (in Hg) 29.35 Ref Temp 68 Static (in H2O) -0.3 Actual Dn (in) O2 (%) 20.3 Ref Press 29.92 Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00000 CO2 (%) 1.0 Md 28.97 Stack Area (sf) 7.07 Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 27.92 Act. Flow (cfm) 15,505 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column Vmnstd 50.14 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 25.1 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 9,649 Moisture % 9.58 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 8,725 Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: " Data Entry Cells "
"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch "

PT # Start Time End Time Clock Time (24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out Desired Delta H Actual

Delta H Probe Temp.

(*F) Filter Temp

(*F) Imp temp.

(*F) Pump Vac.
1 0.0 5.0 10:35 925.870 0.27 365 72 71 0.00 0.60 251 250 72 2 2 5.0 10.0 10:40 928.04 0.33 371 73 71 0.00 0.60 251 248 67 2 3 10.0 15.0 10:45 930.22 0.34 373 73 72 0.00 0.60 250 252 66 2 4 15.0 20.0 11:45 932.39 0.32 372 69 70 0.00 0.60 251 250 70 2 5 20.0 25.0 11:50 934.66 0.26 373 69 69 0.00 0.60 251 249 65 2 6 25.0 30.0 11:55 936.84 0.19 369 70 69 0.00 0.60 250 249 64 2 1 30.0 35.0 12:00 938.960 0.28 369 70 69 0.00 0.60 249 245 64 2 2 35.0 40.0 12:05 941.22 0.32 373 71 69 0.00 0.60 251 249 63 2 3 40.0 45.0 12:10 943.35 0.34 375 72 69 0.00 0.60 249 249 63 2 4 45.0 50.0 12:15 945.11 0.31 375 73 70 0.00 0.60 251 250 61 2 5 50.0 55.0 12:20 947.47 0.26 375 74 70 0.00 0.60 250 253 60 2 6 55.0 60.0 12:25 949.62 0.20 370 74 70 0.00 0.60 251 249 60 2

60.0 65.0 12:30 951.55 0.30 74 70 0.60 250 250 60 2 65.0 70.0 12:35 954.01 0.33 74 70 0.60 250 251 61 2 70.0 75.0 12:40 956.37 0.35 74 70 0.60 250 249 61 2 75.0 80.0 12:45 958.50 0.34 74 70 0.60 250 250 61 2 80.0 85.0 12:50 960.71 0.32 74 71 0.60 249 249 62 2 85.0 90.0 12:55 962.40 0.26 74 71 0.60 250 247 62 2 90.0 95.0 13:00 964.44 0.31 74 71 0.60 249 249 62 2 95.0 100.0 13:05 966.84 0.35 75 71 0.60 250 250 63 2 100.0 105.0 13:10 968.75 0.34 75 71 0.60 251 251 63 2 105.0 110.0 13:15 970.73 0.31 75 71 0.60 249 249 63 2 110.0 115.0 13:20 972.61 0.28 75 71 0.60 249 249 63 2 115.0 120.0 13:25 974.70 0.24 75 71 0.60 249 249 63 2 END 120.0 120.0 13:30 977.020 Average: 51.150 0.30 371.7 73.0 70.3 0.00 0.60 250 249 63.2916667 2 Leak Check

# Appendix D : Equipment Calibration Documents

# Appendix E :

Laboratory Analytical ReportsAcetoneRinseVolume(mL)ParticulateWeight inAcetone(mg)Filter(mg)Organic(mg)Inorganic(mg)Acetone(mg)Filter(mg)FilterablePM2.5 CatchWeight (mg)OrganicPM2.5 CatchWeight (mg)InorganicPM2.5 CatchWeight (mg)V1 Furnace Run 1100.001.707.202.10140.001.707.208.902.10138.00V1 Furnace Run 268.001.009.301.20120.001.009.3010.301.20118.00V1 Furnace Run 389.000.807.601.10120.000.807.608.401.10118.00Blank:150.000.000.400.004.30Blank results were non-detect for acetone and organicCorrectedOTM 27/28 PM2.5Lab Results Blank CorrectionOwens CorningWaxahachie, TexasBTEC Project No. 10-3990.03Sampling Date: August 17 & 18, 2010RinseVolume(mL)AcetoneCatch(mg)Weighton Filter(mg)Acetone(mg)Filter(mg)Ace +Filter(mg)V1 Furnace Run 187.0 4.2 3.6 4.2 3.67.8V1 Furnace Run 269.0 1.4 0.0 1.4 0.01.4V1 Furnace Run 395.02.07.22.07.29.2Blank97.00 0.00 0.50 0.50Acetone blank result was non-detectCorrectedMethod 5 PM Lab ResultsOwens CorningWaxahachie, TexasBTEC Project No. 10-3990.03Sampling Date: August 18 & 19, 2010Compound/FractionBlankFilterResult(μg)BlankFilterDetectionLimit(μg)Run 1Result(μg)Run 2Result(μg)Run 3Result(μg)Test RunDetectionLimit(μg)Run 1(μg)Run 2(μg)Run 3(μg)Antimony ND 0.40 ND ND ND 2.02.00 2.00 2.00Arsenic ND 0.40 2.8 2.6 3.8 2.02.80 2.60 3.80Berylium ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.500.50 0.50 0.50Cadmium ND 0.10 1.19 2.06 2.72 0.501.19 2.06 2.72Chromium 1.69 0.30 30.5 26.1 31.0 1.528.81 24.41 29.31Cobalt ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.500.50 0.50 0.50Lead 1.23 0.20 3.9 4.1 7.1 1.02.67 2.87 5.87Manganese 0.98 0.75 4.7 5.1 4.8 3.83.72 4.12 3.82Nickel ND 0.50 3.8 ND ND 2.53.80 2.50 2.50Selenium ND 1.0 394 288 256 5.0394.00 288.00 256.00Owens CorningMethod 29 Lab ResultsCorrectedSampling Date: August 18 & 19, 2010BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03Waxahachie, TexasCorrectedTotal Volume(ml)ImpingerKOH (ml)HexavalentChromium,Cr6+ [μg]HexavalentChromium,Cr6+ [μg]V1 Furnace Run 1780 300 1311.54V1 Furnace Run 2840 300 1614.43V1 Furnace Run 38103001715.48Blank H2O430 NDBlank KOH480 0.90Method 0061 Lab ResultsSampling Date: August 18 & 19, 2010BTEC Project No. 10-3990.03Waxahachie, TexasOwens Corning

### Your Project #: 10-286A Site: OWENS

CORNING Your C.O.C. #: 0698

Attention: Barry

Boulianne BT Environmental Consulting 2615 Wolcott St. Ferndale, MI USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/09/10



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0B6106 Received: 2010/08/24, 11:00

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train # Samples Received: 9

Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) ( 1 ) 5 2010/09/02 2010/09/07 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28 Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) ( 1 ) 5 2010/09/02 2010/09/09 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28 2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) ( 2 ) 4 N/A 2010/09/02 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM - 027 <2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) ( 2 ) 3 2010/08/27 2010/09/07 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM - 027 Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) ( 2 ) 1 2010/08/27 2010/09/07 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315 Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/09/01 Weight of DCM Received 5 N/A 2010/09/10 Weight of Water from Impingers 5 N/A 2010/09/10

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This is a non-accredited test. (2) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager Email: Lina.Barreto@maxxamanalytics.com Phone# (905) 817-5700

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0B6106 Client Project #: 10-286A Report Date: 2010/09/10 Project name: OWENS CORNING



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID G Y 0 1 3 2 G

Y 0 1 3 3 G

Y 0 1 3 4 Sampling Date 2010/08/17 2010/08/17 2010/08/17 11:55 11:15 14:30 COC Number 0698 0698 0698 U n i t s TB-OWENS RB-OWENS R1-OWENS RDL QC Batch CORNING-OTM28 CORNING-OTM28 CORNING-OTM28

Weight g 170 150 360 0.1 2253700

DCM Weight g 150 180 220 0.1 2253686 Inorganic Condensible PM mg 4.3 2.2 140 0.50 2253698 Organic Condensible PM mg ND ND 2.1 1.0 2253682

ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID G Y 0 1 3 5 G

Y 0 1 6 2 G

Y 0 1 6 6 Sampling Date 2010/08/17 2010/08/18 2010/08/17 19:40 13:50 11:15 COC Number 0698 0698 U n i t s R2-OWENS R3-OWENS RB-OWENS RDL QC Batch CORNING-OTM28 CORNING-OTM28 CORNING-OTM27

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 0.5 2248845

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.40 0.30 2248843

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 150 1 2248855 Weight g 330 290 0.1 2253700

DCM Weight g 220 93 0.1 2253686 Inorganic Condensible PM mg 120 120 0.50 2253698 Organic Condensible PM mg 1.2 1.1 1.0 2253682

ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0B6106 Client Project #: 10-286A Report Date: 2010/09/10 Project name: OWENS CORNING



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID G Y 0 1 9 9 G

Y 0 2 0 0 G

Y 0 2 0 1 Sampling Date 2010/08/17 2010/08/17 2010/08/18 14:30 19:40 13:50 COC Number U n i t s R1-OWENS R2-OWENS R3-OWENS RDL QC Batch CORNING-OTM27 CORNING-OTM27 CORNING-OTM27

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 1.7 1.0 0.8 0.5 2248849

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg 7.20 9.30 7.60 0.30 2248843

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5 - 10) ml 90 58 58 1 2248855

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 100 68 89 1 2248855

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0B6106 Client Project #: 10-286A Report Date: 2010/09/10 Project name: OWENS CORNING



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID GY0132 Collected 2010/08/17 Sample ID TB-OWENS CORNING-OTM28 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253682 2010/09/02 2010/09/07 FF Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253698 2010/09/02 2010/09/09 FF Weight of DCM Received 2253686 N/A 2010/09/10 Weight of Water from Impingers 2253700 N/A 2010/09/10

Maxxam ID GY0133 Collected 2010/08/17 Sample ID RB-OWENS CORNING-OTM28 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253682 2010/09/02 2010/09/07 FF Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253698 2010/09/02 2010/09/09 FF Weight of DCM Received 2253686 N/A 2010/09/10 Weight of Water from Impingers 2253700 N/A 2010/09/10

Maxxam ID GY0134 Collected 2010/08/17 Sample ID R1-OWENS CORNING-OTM28 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253682 2010/09/02 2010/09/07 FF Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253698 2010/09/02 2010/09/09 FF Weight of DCM Received 2253686 N/A 2010/09/10 Weight of Water from Impingers 2253700 N/A 2010/09/10

Maxxam ID GY0135 Collected 2010/08/17 Sample ID R2-OWENS CORNING-OTM28 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253682 2010/09/02 2010/09/07 FF Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253698 2010/09/02 2010/09/09 FF Weight of DCM Received 2253686 N/A 2010/09/10 Weight of Water from Impingers 2253700 N/A 2010/09/10

Maxxam ID GY0162 Collected 2010/08/18 Sample ID R3-OWENS CORNING-OTM28 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253682 2010/09/02 2010/09/07 FF Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2253698 2010/09/02 2010/09/09 FF Weight of DCM Received 2253686 N/A 2010/09/10 Weight of Water from Impingers 2253700 N/A 2010/09/10

Page 4 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0B6106 Client Project #: 10-286A Report Date: 2010/09/10 Project name: OWENS CORNING



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID GY0166 Collected 2010/08/17 Sample ID RB-OWENS CORNING-OTM27 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst 2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2248843 N/A 2010/09/02 BLM Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2248845 2010/08/27 2010/09/07 BLM Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2248855 N/A 2010/09/01 BLM

Maxxam ID GY0199 Collected 2010/08/17 Sample ID R1-OWENS CORNING-OTM27 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst 2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2248843 N/A 2010/09/02 BLM <2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2248849 2010/08/27 2010/09/07 BLM Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2248855 N/A 2010/09/01 BLM

Maxxam ID GY0200 Collected 2010/08/17 Sample ID R2-OWENS CORNING-OTM27 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst 2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2248843 N/A 2010/09/02 BLM <2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2248849 2010/08/27 2010/09/07 BLM Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2248855 N/A 2010/09/01 BLM

Maxxam ID GY0201 Collected 2010/08/18 Sample ID R3-OWENS CORNING-OTM27 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst 2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2248843 N/A 2010/09/02 BLM <2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2248849 2010/08/27 2010/09/07 BLM Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2248855 N/A 2010/09/01 BLM

Page 5 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0B6106 Client Project #: 10-286A Report Date: 2010/09/10 Project name: OWENS CORNING

GENERAL COMMENTS

Sample GY0132-01: Organic Extraction: Very little residue noted in Vial Inorganic Extraction: Whitish residue found in metal dish

Sample GY0133-01: Organic Extraction: Very little residue noted in Vial Inorganic Extraction: Whitish residue found in metal dish

Sample GY0134-01: Organic Extraction: Brownish residue found in Vial Inorganic Extraction: Much of yellowish oily material found in the metal dish

Sample GY0135-01: Organic Extraction: Whitish residue found in Vial Inorganic Extraction: Brownish oily material found in metal dish

Sample GY0162-01: Organic Extraction: Light yellowish residue found in Vial Inorganic Extraction: Yellowish oily material found in metal dish

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027): Maxxam # Filter Condition

GY0166-01R normal GY0199-01R DE/LFT GY0200-01R normal GY0201-01R FT

Normal Filters received in normal condition LFT Loose filter material in the petri dish DE Edges of the filter are frayed

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 6 of 7

### BT Environmental Consulting Attention: Barry Boulianne Client Project #: 10-286A P.O. #: Project name: OWENS CORNING



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0B6106

QA/QC Date Batch Analyzed Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits 2248845 BLM Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2010/09/07 ND, RDL=0.5 mg 2248849 BLM Method Blank < 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse 2010/09/07 ND, RDL=0.5 mg 2253682 FF Spiked Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/09/07 93 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank DUP Organic Condensible PM 2010/09/07 94 % 70 - 130 RPD Organic Condensible PM 2010/09/07 1.1 % 20 Method Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/09/07 ND, RDL=1.0 mg 2253698 FF Method Blank Inorganic Condensible PM 2010/09/09 ND, RDL=0.50 mg

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 7 of 7

### Your Project #: 10-286A Site: OWENS

CORNING Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry

Boulianne BT Environmental Consulting 2615 Wolcott St. Ferndale, MI USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/09/08



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0B6161 Received: 2010/08/24, 11:00

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train # Samples Received: 5

Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. ( 1 ) 5 2010/09/03 2010/09/03 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 5 N/A 2010/09/03

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager Email: Lina.Barreto@maxxamanalytics.com Phone# (905) 817-5700

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0B6161 Client Project #: 10-286A Report Date: 2010/09/08 Project name: OWENS CORNING



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID G Y 0 3 4 8 G

Y 0 3 4 9 G

Y 0 3 5 0 G

Y 0 3 5 0 G

Y 0 3 5 1 Sampling Date 2010/08/18 2010/08/18 2010/08/18 2010/08/18 2010/08/18 13:35 13:35 10:55 10:55 13:30 COC Number N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M26A BLANK-H2SO4-M26A RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch 1-H2SO4-M26A 1-H2SO4-M26A 2-H2SO4-M26A Lab-Dup

Volume ml 280 180 370 320 1 2256091 Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND ND ND ND 200 2257351 Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND 1900 1900 2100 200 2257351

ND = Not detected N/A = Not Applicable RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID G Y 0 3 5 2 Sampling Date 2010/08/18 15:30 COC Number N/A

U n i t s RUN RDL QC Batch 3-H2SO4-M26A

Volume ml 390 1 2256091 Hydrochloric Acid ug 440 200 2257351 Hydrofluoric Acid ug 2000 200 2257351

N/A = Not Applicable RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0B6161 Client Project #: 10-286A Report Date: 2010/09/08 Project name: OWENS CORNING



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID GY0348 Collected 2010/08/18 Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M26A Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2257351 2010/09/03 2010/09/03 A_S Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2256091 N/A 2010/09/03 A_S

Maxxam ID GY0349 Collected 2010/08/18 Sample ID BLANK-H2SO4-M26A Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2257351 2010/09/03 2010/09/03 A_S Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2256091 N/A 2010/09/03 A_S

Maxxam ID GY0350 Collected 2010/08/18 Sample ID RUN 1-H2SO4-M26A Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2257351 2010/09/03 2010/09/03 A_S Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2256091 N/A 2010/09/03 A_S

Maxxam ID GY0350 D u p Collected 2010/08/18 Sample ID RUN 1-H2SO4-M26A Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2257351 2010/09/07 2010/09/03 A_S

Maxxam ID GY0351 Collected 2010/08/18 Sample ID RUN 2-H2SO4-M26A Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2257351 2010/09/03 2010/09/03 A_S Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2256091 N/A 2010/09/03 A_S

Maxxam ID GY0352 Collected 2010/08/18 Sample ID RUN 3-H2SO4-M26A Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/24

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2257351 2010/09/03 2010/09/03 A_S Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2256091 N/A 2010/09/03 A_S

Page 3 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0B6161 Client Project #: 10-286A Report Date: 2010/09/08 Project name: OWENS CORNING

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 4 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting Attention: Barry Boulianne Client Project #: 10-286A P.O. #: Project name: OWENS CORNING



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0B6161

QA/QC Date Batch Analyzed Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits 2257351 A_S Matrix Spike

(GY0350) Hydrochloric Acid 2010/09/03 100 % 80 - 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/09/03 102 % 80 - 120 Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/09/03 102 % 90 - 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/09/03 102 % 90 - 110 Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/09/03 ND, RDL=200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/09/03 ND, RDL=200 ug RPD - Sample/Sample Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2010/09/03 NC % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/09/03 3.0 % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination. NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable calculation.

Page 5 of 5

### Your Project #: 10-286A Site: OWENS CORNING-FIBER GLASS ICR

Attention: Barry

Boulianne BT Environmental Consulting 2615 Wolcott St. Ferndale, MI USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/09/07



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0B6250 Received: 2010/08/25, 11:30

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train # Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference Metals in Combined Train (6020) ( 1 ) 4 2010/09/02 2010/09/02 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29 SOP-00102 Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) ( 1 ) 4 2010/08/26 2010/09/01 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315 Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) ( 1 ) 4 N/A 2010/09/01 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1 Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/08/30

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager Email: Lina.Barreto@maxxamanalytics.com Phone# (905) 817-5700

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169
Page 1 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0B6250 Client Project #: 10-286A Report Date: 2010/09/07 Project name: OWENS CORNING-FIBER GLASS ICR



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID G Y 0 7 9 4 G

Y 0 7 9 6 G

Y 0 7 9 7 G

Y 0 7 9 8 Sampling Date 2010/08/19 2010/08/18 2010/08/19 2010/08/19 07:45 20:00 11:30 14:50 U n i t s RB-M5/29-FILT RUN 1-M5/29 RUN 2-M5/29 RUN 3-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 4.2 1.4 2.0 0.5 2247344

Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.50 3.60 ND 7.20 0.30 2247341

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 97 87 69 95 1 2247346

ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0B6250 Client Project #: 10-286A Report Date: 2010/09/07 Project name: OWENS CORNING-FIBER GLASS ICR



### ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID G Y 0 7 9 4 G

Y 0 7 9 6 G

Y 0 7 9 6 G

Y 0 7 9 7 Sampling Date 2010/08/19 2010/08/18 2010/08/18 2010/08/19 07:45 20:00 20:00 11:30 U n i t s RB-M5/29-FILT RDL RUN 1-M5/29 RUN RUN 2-M5/29 RDL QC Batch 1-M5/29 Lab-Dup

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.40 ND ND ND 2.0 2254565

Total Arsenic (As) ug ND 0.40 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.0 2254565

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.50 2254565

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug ND 0.10 1.19 1.14 2.06 0.50 2254565

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 1.69 0.30 30.5 31.4 26.1 1.5 2254565

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.50 2254565

Total Lead (Pb) ug 1.23 0.20 3.9 4.0 4.1 1.0 2254565

Total Manganese (Mn) ug 0.98 0.75 4.7 4.8 5.1 3.8 2254565

Total Nickel (Ni) ug ND 0.50 3.8 3.9 ND 2.5 2254565

Total Selenium (Se) ug ND 1.0 394 406 288 5.0 2254565

ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID G Y 0 7 9 8 Sampling Date 2010/08/19 14:50 U n i t s RUN 3-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 2.0 2254565

Total Arsenic (As) ug 3.8 2.0 2254565

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.50 2254565

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug 2.72 0.50 2254565

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 31.0 1.5 2254565

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.50 2254565

Total Lead (Pb) ug 7.1 1.0 2254565

Total Manganese (Mn) ug 4.8 3.8 2254565

Total Nickel (Ni) ug ND 2.5 2254565

Total Selenium (Se) ug 256 5.0 2254565

ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0B6250 Client Project #: 10-286A Report Date: 2010/09/07 Project name: OWENS CORNING-FIBER GLASS ICR



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID GY0794 Collected 2010/08/19 Sample ID RB-M5/29-FILT Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2254565 2010/09/02 2010/09/02 N_R Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2247344 2010/08/26 2010/09/01 BLM Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2247341 N/A 2010/09/01 BLM Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2247346 N/A 2010/08/30 BLM

Maxxam ID GY0796 Collected 2010/08/18 Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2254565 2010/09/02 2010/09/02 N_R Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2247344 2010/08/26 2010/09/01 BLM Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2247341 N/A 2010/09/01 BLM Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2247346 N/A 2010/08/30 BLM

Maxxam ID GY0796 D u p Collected 2010/08/18 Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2254565 2010/09/02 2010/09/02 N_R

Maxxam ID GY0797 Collected 2010/08/19 Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2254565 2010/09/02 2010/09/02 N_R Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2247344 2010/08/26 2010/09/01 BLM Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2247341 N/A 2010/09/01 BLM Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2247346 N/A 2010/08/30 BLM

Maxxam ID GY0798 Collected 2010/08/19 Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2254565 2010/09/02 2010/09/02 N_R Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2247344 2010/08/26 2010/09/01 BLM Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2247341 N/A 2010/09/01 BLM Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2247346 N/A 2010/08/30 BLM

Page 4 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0B6250 Client Project #: 10-286A Report Date: 2010/09/07 Project name: OWENS CORNING-FIBER GLASS ICR

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201): Negative weights observed, see filter comments below

Maxxam # Filter Condition

GY0794-01R normal GY0796-01R DE/LFT GY0797-01R DE/LFT GY0798-01R normal

Normal Filters received in normal condition LFT Loose filter material in the petri dish DE Edges of the filter are frayed

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals in Combined Train (6020): Extra 5x dilution was required for all samples except GY0794, due to the matrix. Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample GY0796.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting Attention: Barry Boulianne Client Project #: 10-286A P.O. #: Project name: OWENS CORNING-FIBER GLASS ICR



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0B6250

QA/QC Date Batch Analyzed Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits 2247344 BLM Method Blank Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse 2010/09/01 ND, RDL=0.5 mg 2254565 N_R Matrix Spike

(GY0796) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 102 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (GY0796) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 100 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 2.0 % 20 Matrix Spike (GY0796) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 95 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (GY0796) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 97 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 2.1 % 20 Matrix Spike (GY0796) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 117 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (GY0796) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 113 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 3.5 % 20 Matrix Spike (GY0796) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 101 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (GY0796) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 100 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 1 % 20 Matrix Spike (GY0796) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 103 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (GY0796) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 103 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 0 % 20 Matrix Spike (GY0796) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 102 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (GY0796) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 103 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 1 % 20 Matrix Spike (GY0796) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 104 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (GY0796) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 106 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 1.9 % 20 Matrix Spike (GY0796) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 105 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (GY0796) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 105 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 0 % 20 Matrix Spike (GY0796) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 99 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (GY0796) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 99 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 0 % 20 Matrix Spike (GY0796) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 96 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (GY0796) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 96 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 0 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 99 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 98 % 85 - 115 RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 1.2 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 94 % 85 - 115

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 6 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting Attention: Barry Boulianne Client Project #: 10-286A P.O. #: Project name: OWENS CORNING-FIBER GLASS ICR



### Quality Assurance Report

(Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0B6250

QA/QC Date Batch Analyzed Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits 2254565 N_R Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 96 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 2.5 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 108 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 110 % 85 - 115 RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 2.6 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 97 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 97 % 85 - 115 RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 0.2 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 99 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 100 % 85 - 115 RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 0.6 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 100 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 102 % 85 - 115 RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 1.9 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 101 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 101 % 85 - 115 RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 0.1 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 101 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 102 % 85 - 115 RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 0.3 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 96 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 98 % 85 - 115 RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 2.4 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 94 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 95 % 85 - 115 RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 1.8 % 20 Method Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.40 ug Method Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.40 ug RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 NC % 20 Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.40 ug Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.40 ug RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 NC % 20 Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.10 ug Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.10 ug RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 NC % 20 Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.10 ug Method Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.10 ug RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 NC % 20 Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.30 ug Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.30 ug RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 NC % 20 Method Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.10 ug Method Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.10 ug RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 NC % 20 Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.20 ug Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.20 ug RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 NC % 20 Method Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.75 ug Method Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.75 ug RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 NC % 20 Method Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.50 ug Method Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=0.50 ug RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 NC % 20 Method Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=1.0 ug Method Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 7 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting Attention: Barry Boulianne Client Project #: 10-286A P.O. #: Project name: OWENS CORNING-FIBER GLASS ICR



### Quality Assurance Report

(Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0B6250

QA/QC Date Batch Analyzed Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits 2254565 N_R RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

RPD - Sample/Sample Dup Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/09/02 NC % 20

Total Arsenic (As) 2010/09/02 NC % 20 Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/09/02 NC % 20 Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/09/02 NC % 20 Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/09/02 2.9 % 20 Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/09/02 NC % 20 Total Lead (Pb) 2010/09/02 NC % 20 Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/09/02 NC % 20 Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/09/02 NC % 20 Total Selenium (Se) 2010/09/02 3.1 % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement. Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination. NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable calculation.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 8 of 8

### Ohio Lumex Co., Inc. 9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3 Twinsburg, OH 44087 Phone: (330) 405-0837 Fax: (330) 405-0847 www.ohiolumex.com Other



## Client Name 

# BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Report Number BTEnvironmental110210 Report 2



## Date

Contact Name Phone

**Trap I.D. Test Location**  **Date Analyzed Scientist**  **Mass ng Sect.1**  **Mass ng Sect.2**  **Spike Level**  **% Spike Recovery**  **Date(s) in Stack**  **Comments**
80304 Waxahachie, TX 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 77 0 10/21/2010 Run 1, Trap B 80320 Waxahachie, TX 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 27 0 20 10/21/2010 Run 1, Trap A 80329 Waxahachie, TX 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 77 0 10/22/2010 Run 2, Trap B 80254 Waxahachie, TX 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 27 0.1 20 10/22/2010 Run 2, Trap A 80313 Waxahachie, TX 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 83 0.1 10/22/2010 Run 3, Trap B 80323 Waxahachie, TX 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 29 0.3 20 10/22/2010 Run 3, Trap A 80296 Waxahachie, TX 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 0.1 0.4 10/22/2010 Blank, Trap B 80319 Waxahachie, TX 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 19 0.1 20 10/22/2010 Blank, Trap A

Variability +- 10% 

## Plant/Source 

# Owens Corning V-1 DEP Stack 

# Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

11/2/2010 Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Matthew Smith msmith@btecinc.com Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush

Less than .52 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less than the lowest detection limit.

Calibration Report Available 

## (248)-548-8072

### Your Project #: 10-286A Site: OWENS

CORNING

Attention: Barry

Boulianne BT Environmental Consulting 2615 Wolcott St. Ferndale, MI USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/08/31



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0B6347 Received: 2010/08/25, 11:30

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train # Samples Received: 5

Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 5 2010/08/25 2010/08/25 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061) Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2010/08/25

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager Email: Lina.Barreto@maxxamanalytics.com Phone# (905) 817-5700

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0B6347 Client Project #: 10-286A Report Date: 2010/08/31 Project name: OWENS CORNING



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID G Y 1 1 6 5 G

Y 1 1 6 6 G

Y 1 1 6 7 G

Y 1 1 6 7 Sampling Date 2010/08/19 2010/08/19 2010/08/18 2010/08/18 07:15 07:15 20:40 20:40 U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M0061 BLANK-KOH-M0061 RDL RUN RUN RDL QC Batch 1-KOH-M0061 1-KOH-M0061 Lab-Dup

Volume ml 430 480 1 780 1 2245483

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.9 0.2 13 13 0.8 2246541

ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID G Y 1 1 6 8 G

Y 1 1 6 9 Sampling Date 2010/08/19 2010/08/19 11:25 15:15 U n i t s RUN RUN RDL QC Batch 2-KOH-M0061 3-KOH-M0061

Volume ml 840 810 1 2245483

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 16 17 0.4 2246541

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0B6347 Client Project #: 10-286A Report Date: 2010/08/31 Project name: OWENS CORNING



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID GY1165 Collected 2010/08/19 Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M0061 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2246541 2010/08/25 2010/08/25 LLE Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2245483 N/A 2010/08/25 FMO

Maxxam ID GY1166 Collected 2010/08/19 Sample ID BLANK-KOH-M0061 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2246541 2010/08/25 2010/08/25 LLE Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2245483 N/A 2010/08/25 FMO

Maxxam ID GY1167 Collected 2010/08/18 Sample ID RUN 1-KOH-M0061 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2246541 2010/08/25 2010/08/25 LLE Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2245483 N/A 2010/08/25 FMO

Maxxam ID GY1167 D u p Collected 2010/08/18 Sample ID RUN 1-KOH-M0061 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2246541 2010/08/25 2010/08/25 LLE

Maxxam ID GY1168 Collected 2010/08/19 Sample ID RUN 2-KOH-M0061 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2246541 2010/08/25 2010/08/25 LLE Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2245483 N/A 2010/08/25 FMO

Maxxam ID GY1169 Collected 2010/08/19 Sample ID RUN 3-KOH-M0061 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/08/25

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2246541 2010/08/25 2010/08/25 LLE Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2245483 N/A 2010/08/25 FMO

Page 3 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0B6347 Client Project #: 10-286A Report Date: 2010/08/31 Project name: OWENS CORNING

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061): Reagent Blank Sample noticed to contain trace of Chromium.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 4 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting Attention: Barry Boulianne Client Project #: 10-286A P.O. #: Project name: OWENS CORNING



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0B6347

QA/QC Date Batch Analyzed Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits 2246541 LLE Matrix Spike

(GY1167) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/08/25 92 % 80 - 120 Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/08/25 96 % 90 - 110 Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/08/25 ND, RDL=0.1 ug RPD - Sample/Sample Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/08/25 0.2 % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 5 of 5

# APPENDIX F Initial Test Program Hg Test Results and DocumentationM30B Mercury TestingCompany NamePlant Location CityPlant Location StateSource NameSource IDOwens Corning Waxahachie Texas V-1 DEP Stack EPN-3Please note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"Measured Value(mg/dscm)CorrectedConcentration(mg/dscm at 7% O2)Basis (Wet or Dry)Test Method Used(EPA Method 30B)Data Flag (ADL,BDL, DDL)Test MethodCommentsCalculatedEmission Rate(lb/hr)ProcessProduction Rate(tons glass/hr)1 10/21/2010 14:45 10/21/2010 16:45 6.91E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B2.42E-052 10/22/2010 8:20 10/22/2010 10:20 6.59E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B2.18E-053 10/22/2010 10:30 10/22/2010 13:30 7.22E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B2.36E-05Test End TimeRun Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateTotal Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsPage 1 of 31/24/2011M30B Mercury TestingQA/QC DocumentationCalculatedEmission Rate(lb/ton)Trap IDSection 1Mass (ng)Section 2Mass (ng)TotalMass (ng)InitialSpike(ng)Total Non-Spike (ng)SampleVolume(dscm)VolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough(%)BreaktroughLimitConcentration(μg/dscm)Trap ID8.94 0.9 20.2 16,218.11 9,343.61 359R1, B 77 0 77 0 77 0.11 2% 00.69R1, A9.65 1.1 20.3 15,838.93 8,824.95 379R2, B 77 0 77 0 77 0.12 0% 00.66R2, A9.56 1.0 20.3 15,505.00 8,724.51 372R3, B 83 0.1 83.1 0 83.1 0.12 0% 00.72R3, AFlue GasTemperature (F)Other Supporting InformationFlue GasMoisture(%)Flue GasO2(%)Flue GasCO2(%)Flue GasFlow Rate(dscfm)Flue Gas FlowRate (acfm)Trap #1≤20% of fieldrecovery test≤ 10% ofSection 1 Hgmass for Hgconc. >1μg/dscm: or≤20% of Section1 for Hg conc.≤1Page 2 of 31/24/2011M30B Mercury TestingSection 1MassSection 2MassTotalMassInitialSpikeTotal NonSpikeSampleVolumeVolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough (%)BreaktroughLimitConcentration(μg/dscm)Abs. diff. RD (%) LimitCrecR (%) by RunRavg(%)Limit27.0 0.00 27.00 20 7 0.11 2% 00.10.6 84 -0.4525 -25627.0 0.10 27.10 20 7.1 0.12 0% 00.10.6 83 -0.4266 -24929.0 0.30 29.30 20 9.3 0.12 0% 10.10.6 80 -0.4677 -270-258AverageRecovery,between 85 and115%Trap #2Paired Trap Agreement (RD) Measured Spike Recovery ( R )≤20% of fieldrecovery test≤10% of Section1 Hg mass forHg conc. >1μg/dscm: or≤20% of Section 1for Hg conc.≤1μg/dscm≥10 % RD massfor Hg conc. >1μg/dscm: or≤20% RD or≤0.2μg/dscm abs.diff.for Hg conc.≤1μg/dscmPage 3 of 31/24/2011BT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-286A Probe # Pollutant Hg Points/Port 6Company OWENS DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points12Location WAXHACHIE, TX Rate (L/m) 1 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 5.0Source V-1 DEP STACK Delta ∆H@ Date 17-Aug-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator GILLEN Bws (%) # of Ports 2 Total Run120.0Filter Number Condensate VolumeCp Ps (in Hg)29.30Barometric29.32 Silica Gel Weight GainDGM Y Pm (in Hg)29.32Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.3Actual Dn (in) O2 (%)20.3Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2)7.06900CO2 (%) 1.0 Md28.97Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.97Act. Flow (cfm)0.00Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)120.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)0.00Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)0.00Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Clock Time Sample TimeStack Temp (oF)Heated LineTemp (*F)A B A B A B A B A B A B8:20:00 AM 5.0 378.0 271 271 1 1 8.5 8.5 0.00 0 74 73 0.00 0.00 2705.0 378.0 274 274 1 1 8.5 8.5 5.52 5.54 74 74 5.52 5.54 2725.0 377.0 273 273 1 1 8.5 8.5 11.05 11.1 74 74 11.05 11.10 2725.0 378.0 275 275 1 1 8.5 8.5 15.88 15.62 75 77 15.88 15.62 2745.0 378.0 276 276 1 1 8.5 8.5 20.02 20.26 77 78 20.02 20.26 2735.0 378.0 281 281 1 1 8.5 8.5 24.94 24.92 78 80 24.94 24.92 2755.0 378.0 280 280 1 1 8.5 8.5 30.04 30.1 77 81 30.04 30.10 2745.0 379.0 277 277 1 1 9 9.5 35.42 35.31 78 82 35.42 35.31 2775.0 379.0 279 279 1 1 8 8.5 40.21 40.36 79 83 40.21 40.36 2795.0 379.0 277 277 1 1 9 8.5 45.02 45.17 80 84 45.02 45.17 2775.0 379.0 274 274 1 1 9.5 9 50.25 50.19 80 84 50.25 50.19 2795.0 380.0 276 276 1 1 9 8.5 55.05 55.15 81 84 55.05 55.15 2745.0 381.0 275 275 1 1 9.5 9 60.13 60.05 81 85 60.13 60.05 2775.0 381.0 274 274 1 1 10 10 65.13 65.13 81 86 65.13 65.13 2775.0 382.0 275 275 1 1 10 10 70.08 70.19 82 86 70.08 70.19 2765.0 382.0 274 274 1 1 9.5 10 75.21 75.18 82 87 75.21 75.18 2755.0 383.0 274 274 1 1 11 10.5 79.97 80.02 82 87 79.97 80.02 2755.0 383.0 274 274 1 1 12 11 85.19 85.07 82 86 85.19 85.07 2765.0 383.0 274 274 1 1 11 11 90.09 90.05 82 87 90.09 90.05 2765.0 383.0 274 274 1 1 11 11 94.97 95.03 82 87 94.97 95.03 2765.0 383.0 274 274 1 1 12 11.5 100.11 100.09 82 86 100.11 100.09 2775.0 383.0 274 274 1 1 12 11.5 105.06 105.09 82 86 105.06 105.09 2765.0 383.0 274 274 1 1 12 10 110.09 110.12 82 86 110.09 110.12 2765.0 383.0 275 275 1 1 12 11 115.12 115.08 81 86 115.12 115.08 27510:20:00 AM 5.0120.078 120.61120.08 120.61Average 5.0 380.5 275.2 275.279.5 82.875Volume120.078 120.610120.0780 120.61dscm0.12 0.110.12 0.11Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading (liters)Pre Test Post Test Pre Test Post Test0.000 @ 20.0 in Hg 0.000 @ 21.0 in Hg0.000 @ 21.0 in Hg0.000 @ 21.0 in Hg0.000 @ 21.0 in Hg0.000 @ 21.0 in HgDGM Y = 1.024Trap/ Probe TempDGM Y = 1.028BT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-286A Probe # Pollutant Hg Points/Port 6Company OWENS DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points12LocationWAXAHACHIE, TXRate (L/m) 1 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) N/ASource V-1 DEP STACK Delta ∆H@ Date 17-Aug-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator GILLEN Bws (%) # of Ports 2 Total Run120.0Filter Number Condensate VolumeCp Ps (in Hg)29.33Barometric29.35 Silica Gel Weight GainDGM Y Pm (in Hg)29.35Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.3Actual Dn (in) O2 (%)20.3Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2)7.06900CO2 (%) 1.0 Md28.97Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.97Act. Flow (cfm)0.00Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)120.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)0.00Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)0.00Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempHeated LineTemp (*F)A B A B A B A B A B A B2:10:00 PM 5.0 369.0 235 235 1 1 7 7 0.00 0 86 88 0.00 0.00 2745.0 378.0 235 235 1 1 6.5 6.5 5.02 5.1 86 90 5.02 5.10 2755.0 379.0 234 234 1 1 7 7 10.01 9.98 86 90 10.01 9.98 2755.0 381.0 234 234 1 1 10 10 15.12 15.08 87 91 15.12 15.08 2755.0 383.0 235 235 1 1 9.5 9 20.08 20.11 87 91 20.08 20.11 2755.0 384.0 235 235 1 1 12 12 26.05 25.11 88 93 26.05 25.11 2745.0 385.0 235 235 1 1 10 11.5 30.08 30.14 89 93 30.08 30.14 2755.0 384.0 235 235 1 1 12 12 35.12 35 89 93 35.12 35.00 2745.0 385.0 235 235 1 1 11.5 12.5 40.07 40.01 89 94 40.07 40.01 2745.0 385.0 235 235 1 1 12 11.5 44.98 44.97 89 94 44.98 44.97 2755.0 385.0 236 236 1 1 10.5 13 50.07 50.1 89 94 50.07 50.10 2755.0 385.0 235 235 1 1 12 11 54.95 54.98 89 94 54.95 54.98 2765.0 384.0 235 235 1 1 12 11 60.13 60.067 89 94 60.13 60.07 2755.0 385.0 235 235 1 1 11.5 12 65.08 65.08 89 94 65.08 65.08 2745.0 384.0 235 235 1 1 9 10 70.12 70.09 88 91 70.12 70.09 2755.0 385.0 235 235 1 1 12.5 12.5 75.10 75.07 88 92 75.10 75.07 2745.0 385.0 227 227 1 1 9 10 80.08 81.16 89 92 80.08 81.16 2745.0 386.0 235 235 1 1 11 12.5 85.01 85.12 89 94 85.01 85.12 2755.0 386.0 234 234 1 1 11 14 90.14 90.04 90 94 90.14 90.04 2765.0 386.0 235 235 1 1 11.5 13 95.02 95.18 90 94 95.02 95.18 2755.0 386.0 235 235 1 1 11 12 100.00 100.16 90 94 100.00 100.16 2765.0 387.0 235 235 1 1 11 12.5 105.13 105.2 90 95 105.13 105.20 2755.0 387.0 234 234 1 1 11 11 110.02 110.08 90 95 110.02 110.08 2755.0 388.0 234 234 1 1 10.5 11 115.06 115.02 90 95 115.06 115.02 2754:25:00 PM120.121 120.078120.12 120.08Average 0.0 383.8 234.5 234.588.58333333 92.88Volume120.121 120.078120.121 120.078dscm0.11 0.110.11 0.11Trap/ Probe TempDGM Y = 1.028DGM Y = 1.024Post Test0.000 @ 15.0 in Hg 0.000 @ 22.0 in Hg 0.000 @ 15.0 in Hg 0.000 @ 22.0 in HgLeak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post Test Pre TestBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-286A Probe # Pollutant Hg Points/Port 6Company OWENS DGM # Method 30B Total Points12LocationWAXAHACHIE, TXRate (L/m) 1 Run # 5 Time/pt (min) N/ASource V-1 DEP STACK Delta ∆H@ Date 18-Aug-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator GILLEN Bws (%) # of Ports 2 Total Run120.0Filter Number Condensate VolumeCp Ps (in Hg)29.28Barometric29.30 Silica Gel Weight GainDGM Y Pm (in Hg)29.30Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.3Actual Dn (in) O2 (%)18.8Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2)7.06900CO2 (%) 1.0 Md28.91Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.91Act. Flow (cfm)0.00Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)120.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)0.00Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)0.00Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempCondenser FilterTemp (*F)A B A B A B A B A B A B7:05:00 AM 381.0 277 277 1 1 9 7.5 0.00 0 69 70 0.00 0.00 275381.0 278 278 1 1 9 7.35 5.12 5.07 69 70 5.12 5.07 274381.0 277 277 1 1 7 6.5 10.05 10 69 70 10.05 10.00 274381.0 276 276 1 1 7 6 15.14 15.06 70 72 15.14 15.06 274381.0 276 276 1 1 5 5 20.11 20.05 72 74 20.11 20.05 275382.0 274 274 1 1 7 6 25.02 25.1 74 77 25.02 25.10 277382.0 270 270 1 1 7 6 30.06 30.12 75 78 30.06 30.12 277382.0 272 272 1 1 7 5.5 35.11 35.01 75 78 35.11 35.01 276382.0 273 273 1 1 7.5 5.5 40.26 40.23 76 79 40.26 40.23 276383.0 275 275 1 1 6.5 5.5 45.11 45.09 77 81 45.11 45.09 275383.0 275 275 1 1 5 5 50.38 50.03 77 81 50.38 50.03 275383.0 275 275 1 1 6 6 55.10 55.09 77 82 55.10 55.09 277383.0 273 273 1 1 6 6 60.24 60.14 77 82 60.24 60.14 276383.0 274 274 1 1 6 5.5 65.09 65.13 78 83 65.09 65.13 276383.0 273 273 1 1 6 5 70.12 70.09 78 83 70.12 70.09 275383.0 273 273 1 1 5.5 5 75.02 75.16 78 83 75.02 75.16 275383.0 274 274 1 1 7.5 6.5 80.11 80.23 79 84 80.11 80.23 274382.0 275 275 1 1 7.5 6.5 85.01 85.13 79 84 85.01 85.13 273382.0 275 275 1 1 7 6 90.31 90.22 79 84 90.31 90.22 275382.0 274 274 1 1 6.5 6 95.11 95.21 79 84 95.11 95.21 275382.0 275 275 1 1 6 6 100.14 100.01 80 85 100.14 100.01 275382.0 276 276 1 1 6.5 6 105.04 105.17 80 85 105.04 105.17 275381.0 276 276 1 1 7 5.5 110.07 110.11 80 85 110.07 110.11 275381.0 276 276 1 1 5 5 115.01 115.22 80 85 115.01 115.22 2749:05:00 AM120.056 120.11120.06 120.11Average 0.0 382.0 274.7 274.776.125 79.96Volume120.056 120.110120.056 120.11dscm0.12 0.120.12 0.12Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post Test Pre Test Post Test0.000 @ 20.0 in Hg 0.000 @ 20 in Hg 0.000 @21.5 in Hg 0.000 @ 20 in HgTrap/ Probe Temp

### Ohio Lumex Co., Inc. 9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3 Twinsburg, OH 44087 Phone: (330) 405-0837 Fax: (330) 405-0847 www.ohiolumex.com Other 

# Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

Report Number BTEnvironmental083110 Report



## Client Name 

# BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Date

Contact Name Phone (248)-548-8072 (972)-931-7127

**Trap I.D. Date Analyzed**  **Scientist Mass ng**  **Sect.1 Mass ng** 

**Sect.2 Mass ng** 

**Sect.3 Spike** 

**Level % Spike** 

**Recovery Date(s) in** 

**Stack Comments** 
70609 8/30/2010 Andrew Mertz 164 0.25 10 8/18/2010 Run 5, Trap A 70660 8/30/2010 Andrew Mertz 152 0.11 8/18/2010 Run 5, Trap B *70621 8/30/2010 Andrew Mertz 3.37 21.8 10 8/17/2010 Run 3, Trap A *67502 8/30/2010 Andrew Mertz 1.49 4.85 8/17/2010 Run 3, Trap B 70608 8/31/2010 Andrew Mertz 295 ** 10 8/17/2010 Run 4, Trap A 67483 8/31/2010 Andrew Mertz 279 ** 8/17/2010 Run 4, Trap B *70604 8/31/2010 Andrew Mertz 7.67 67.0 10 8/17/2010 Run 1, Trap A *70626 8/31/2010 Andrew Mertz 5.77 9.44 8/17/2010 Run 1, Trap B 70576 8/31/2010 Andrew Mertz 9.62 0.18 10 8/19/2010 RB, Trap A 70648 8/31/2010 Andrew Mertz 0.12 0.10 8/19/2010 RB, Trap B 70613 8/31/2010 Andrew Mertz 9.68 0.12 10 8/19/2010 TB, Trap A 70647 8/31/2010 Andrew Mertz 0.13 0.19 8/19/2010 TB, Trap B

* Traps contained very loose plugs and displayed channeling.

** Section 2 carbon bed was missing from trap.

Variability +- 10% Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Mike

Hutcherson mhutcherson@metcoenv.com

Calibration Report Available Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush



# 8/31/2010

Less than .031 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less than

the lowest detection limit.