alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol Federal Financial (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), we, John B. Dicus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kent
G. Townsend, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as
  of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements
  included in such Report.







Date:   February 6,
2006                                    By:   /s/
John B.
Dicus                                                                                     John
B. Dicus, President and
                                                                                     Chief
Executive Officer



Date:   February 6,
2006                                   By:   /s/
Kent G.
Townsend                                                                                     Kent
G. Townsend, Executive Vice
President,                                                                                     Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer
§ 3.6 Payroll deductions permissible with the approval of the Secretary of Labor. Any contractor or subcontractor may apply to the Secretary of Labor for permission to make any deduction not permitted under § 3.5. The Secretary may grant permission whenever he finds that: ( a ) The contractor, subcontractor, or any affiliated person does not make a profit or benefit directly or indirectly from the deduction either in the form of a commission, dividend, or otherwise;
( b ) The deduction is not otherwise prohibited by law;
( c ) The deduction is either ( 1 ) voluntarily consented to by the employee in writing and in advance of the period in which the work is to be done and such consent is not a condition either for the obtaining of employment or its continuance, or
( 2 ) provided for in a bona fide collective bargaining agreement between the contractor or subcontractor and representatives of its employees; and
( d ) The deduction serves the convenience and interest of the employee.
§ 1960.30 Abatement of unsafe or unhealthful working conditions. ( a ) The agency shall ensure the prompt abatement of unsafe and unhealthful conditions. Where a Notice of an Unsafe or Unhealthful Working Condition has been issued, abatement shall be within the time set forth in the notice, or in accordance with the established abatement plan.
( b ) The procedures for correcting unsafe or unhealthful working conditions shall include a follow-up, to the extent necessary, to determine whether the correction was made. If, upon the follow-up, it appears that the correction was not made, or was not carried out in accordance with an abatement plan prepared pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section, the official in charge of the establishment and the appropriate safety and health committee shall be notified of the failure to abate.
( c ) The official in charge of the establishment shall promptly prepare an abatement plan with the appropriate participation of the establishment's Safety and Health Official or a designee, if in the judgment of the establishment official the abatement of an unsafe or unhealthful working condition will not be possible within 30 calendar days. Such plan shall contain an explanation of the circumstances of the delay in abatement, a proposed timetable for the abatement, and a summary of steps being taken in the interim to protect employees from being injured as a result of the unsafe or unhealthful working condition. A copy of the plan shall be sent to the safety and health committee, and, if no committee exists, to the representative of the employees. Any changes in an abatement plan will require the preparation of a new plan in accordance with the provisions of this section.
( d ) When a hazard cannot be abated within the authority and resources of the official in charge of the establishment, that official shall request assistance from appropriate higher authority. The local safety and health official, any established committee and/or employee representatives, and all personnel subject to the hazard shall be advised of this action and of interim protective measures in effect, and shall be kept informed of subsequent progress on the abatement plan.
( e ) When a hazard cannot be abated without assistance of the General Services Administration or other Federal lessor agency, the occupant agency shall act with the lessor agency to secure abatement. Procedures for coordination with the General Services Administration are contained in subpart E of this part.
( f ) The procedures OSHA will use to verify Federal agency abatement are included in the private sector guidelines at 29 CFR 1903.19.
[45 FR 69798, Oct. 21, 1980, as amended at 78 FR 47190, Aug. 5, 2013]
§ 38.87 Director's Initial Determination that reasonable cause exists to believe that a violation has taken place. If the Director finds reasonable cause to believe that the respondent has violated the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIOA or this part the Director must issue an Initial Determination. The Initial Determination must include: ( a ) The specific findings of the investigation;
( b ) The corrective or remedial action that the Department proposes to the respondent, under § 38.90;
( c ) The time by which the respondent must complete the corrective or remedial action;
( d ) Whether it will be necessary for the respondent to enter into a written agreement under §§ 38.91 through 38.93; and
( e ) The opportunity to engage in voluntary compliance negotiations.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 107 

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the rights of Members of Congress (or any employee of a Member of Congress authorized by that 

Member) to lead tours of the United States Capitol complex. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 11 (legislative day, DECEMBER 10), 2008 

Mr. BURR (for himself, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. THUNE, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. HATCH, 

Mr. INHOFE, and Mr. ENZI) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the rights of 

Members of Congress (or any employee of a Member 

of Congress authorized by that Member) to lead tours 

of the United States Capitol complex. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that— 

3 (1) Members of Congress (or any employee of 

4 a Member of Congress authorized by that Member) 

5 should not be prohibited, with or without prior no6 tice to the Architect of the Capitol, the Chief Execu7 tive Officer for Visitor Services, or the Capitol Guide 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•SCON 107 ATS 

1 Service, from taking guests or visitors into the pub2 licly accessible areas of the United States Capitol 

3 complex during normal business hours; 

4 (2) nothing in this resolution shall be construed 

5 to affect the authority granted to employees of Mem6 bers of Congress by the respective Members relating 

7 to the movement of such employees through the 

8 United States Capitol complex; 

9 (3) at the direction of the Capitol Police Board 

10 or the fire marshal, the taking of guests or visitors 

11 into the publicly accessible areas of the United 

12 States Capitol complex by a Member of Congress (or 

13 any employee of a Member of Congress authorized 

14 by that Member) should be temporarily suspended or 

15 otherwise subject to restriction for safety or security 

16 reasons to the same extent as guided tours of the 

17 United States Capitol complex which are led by the 

18 Architect of the Capitol or the Capitol Guide Serv19 ice; and 

20 (4) nothing in this resolution shall be inter21 preted to contradict the Congressional staff-led tour 

22 policy that ensures that tours of the Capitol are con23 ducted by staff members who have undergone man24 datory life safety and historical accuracy training. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         897,486
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,304,642
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,836,195
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       7,632,005
<DEPRECIATION>                                 162,863
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,604,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,699,998
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,208,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,604,677
<SALES>                                        606,063
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               650,642
<CGS>                                          305,199
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  305,199
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               691,433
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (357,181)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (23,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (334,181)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (334,181)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 112 

Designating April 6, 2007, as ‘‘National Missing Persons Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 20, 2007 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. CRAPO) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating April 6, 2007, as ‘‘National Missing Persons 

Day’’. 

Whereas each year tens of thousands of people go missing in 

the United States; 

Whereas, on any given day, there are as many as 100,000 

active missing persons cases in the United States; 

Whereas the Missing Persons File of the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) was implemented in 1975; 

Whereas, in 2005, 109,531 persons were reported missing to 

law enforcement agencies nationwide, of whom 11,868 

were between the ages of 18 and 20; 

Whereas section 204 of the PROTECT Act, known as 

Suzanne’s Law and passed by Congress on April 10, 

2003, modifies section 3701(a) of the Crime Control Act 

of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 5779(a)), so that agencies must enter 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 112 IS 

records into the NCIC database for all missing persons 

under the age of 21; 

Whereas Kristen’s Act (42 U.S.C. 14665), passed in 1999, 

has established grants for organizations to, among other 

things, track missing persons and provide informational 

services to families and the public; 

Whereas, according to the NCIC, 48,639 missing persons 

were located in 2005, an improvement of 4.2 percent 

from the previous year; 

Whereas many persons reported missing may be victims of 

Alzheimer’s disease or other health-related issues, or may 

be victims of foul play; 

Whereas, regardless of age or circumstances, all missing persons have families who need support and guidance to endure the days, months, or years they may spend searching for their missing loved ones; and 

Whereas it is important to applaud the committed efforts of 

families, law enforcement agencies, and concerned citizens who work to locate missing persons and to prevent 

all forms of victimization: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates April 6, 2007, as ‘‘National 

3 Missing Persons Day’’; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to— 

6 (A) observe the day with appropriate pro7 grams and activities; and 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 112 IS 

1 (B) support worthy initiatives and in2 creased efforts to locate missing persons. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 31997R2520 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31997R2520

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2520/97 of 15 December 1997 adapting Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 as regards the combined nomenclature codes for tomatoes and table grapes **

*
Official Journal L 346 , 17/12/1997 P. 0041 - 0041 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2520/97 of 15 December 1997 adapting Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 as regards the combined nomenclature codes for tomatoes and table grapes

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 234/79 of 5 February 1979 on the procedure for adjusting the Common Customs Tariff nomenclature used for agricultural products (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 3290/94 (2), and in particular Article 2 (1) thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EC) No 2086/97 of 4 November 1997 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (3) amends the combined nomenclature, in particular as regards tomatoes and table grapes;

Whereas the table in Article 1 (2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 18 October 1996 on the common organization of the market in fruit and vegetables (4) should be adapted;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Fruit and Vegetables,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The table in Article 1 (2) of Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 is hereby amended as follows:

>TABLE>

is replaced by:

>TABLE>

>TABLE>

is replaced by:

>TABLE>

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 1998.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 December 1997.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 34, 9. 2. 1979, p. 2.

(2) OJ L 349, 31. 12. 1994, p. 105.

(3) OJ L 312, 14. 11. 1997, p. 1.

(4) OJ L 297, 21. 11. 1996, p. 1.
(79 South. 878)

#### REPUBLIC IRON & STEEL CO. v. McMILLAN.

(6 Div. 516.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 28, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; John H. Miller, Judge.

Percy, Benners & Burr, of Birmingham, for appellant. Altman & Edmondson, of Birmingham, for appellee.

BROWN, P. J.

Appeal dismissed by agreement.
#### Ann Winkler, an Infant, by Arthur G. Winkler, Her Guardian ad Litem, et al., Respondents, *v.*American Sundries Co., Inc., Appellant.

Submitted June 4, 1937;

decided July 13, 1937.

*491
      *Alfred M. Bailey, William W. Bailey*and *John*J. *Kirwan*for appellant.

*George J. Shimm*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, Htjbbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: O’Brien, J.
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.3 Inspections—right of entry. ( a ) It shall be a condition of each contract which is subject to section 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act that the Secretary of Labor or any authorized representative shall have a right of entry to any site of contract performance for the following purposes: ( 1 ) To inspect or investigate the matter of compliance with the safety and health standards contained in subpart C of this part and following subparts; and
( 2 ) To carry out the duties of the Secretary under section 107(b) of the Act.
( b ) For the purpose of carrying out his investigative duties under the Act, the Secretary of Labor may, by agreement, use with or without reimbursement the services, personnel, and facilities of any State or Federal agency. Any agreements with States under this section shall be similar to those provided for under the Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act under 41 CFR part 50-205.
§ 36.215 Membership practices of certain organizations. ( a ) *Social fraternities and sororities.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to the membership practices of social fraternities and sororities that are exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. 501(a), the active membership of which consists primarily of students in attendance at institutions of higher education.
( b ) *YMCA, YWCA, Girl Scouts, Boy Scouts, and Camp Fire Girls.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to the membership practices of the Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA), the Young Women's Christian Association (YWCA), the Girl Scouts, the Boy Scouts, and Camp Fire Girls.
( c ) *Voluntary youth service organizations.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to the membership practices of a voluntary youth service organization that is exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. 501(a), and the membership of which has been traditionally limited to members of one sex and principally to persons of less than nineteen years of age.
(80 South. 136)

#### CLECKLER v. CHILDRESS et al.

(5 Div. 273.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 12, 1918.)

1. Chattel Mortgages <&wkey;170(l) — Assignment^-Passage oe Title.

An indorsement on a mortgage, “I have this day transferred $13.50 to J. D. C. without recourse,” while it might invest the indorsee with the equitable title, does not invest him with such title as to authorize him to maintain trespass for the wrongful taking of the property, or trover for its conversion.

2. Appeal and Error <&wkey;1008(l) — Review —Findings oe Fact.

The findings of trial court will be accorded the weight of the verdict of a jury.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Chilton County; Leon McCord, Judge.

Trover and conversion by J. D. Cleckler against H. T. Childress and J. J. Stanley. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

The plaintiff claims as a purchaser from S. P. Cleckler by virtue of a mortgage executed by S. P. Cleckler to S. J. Reynolds. The indorsement on the mortgage is as follows:

“I have this day transferred $13.50 to J. D. Cleckler without recourse, this the 11th day of November, 1916. [Signed] S. J. Reynolds.”

It appears that H. T. Childress was a constable, and as such constable he levied an execution in favor of J. J. Stanley, and against S. P. Cleckler upon the mare in question, and sold same under said execution, preferring an indemnifying bond from Stanley. The evidence was conflicting as to the sale of the mare prior to the issuance of the execution.

Middleton & Reynolds, of Clanton, for appellant.

Curry & Walker, of Clanton, for appellees.

BROWN, P. J.

[1, 2] The indorsement on the mortgage offered in evidence by the plaintiff does not purport to transfer the mortgage to the plaintiff, and while it may be sufficient in connection with other evidence to invest the plaintiff with the equitable title, it does not invest the plaintiff with such title as would authorize him to maintain an action of trespass for the wrongful taking, or trover for the wrongful conversion of the property embraced in the mortgage. Sanders v. Rogers, 77 South. 69;1 The evidence as to the sale of the mare by S. P. Cleckler to the plaintiff is not without dispute or room for adverse inference to the plaintiff’s right of recovery. This evidence was given ore tenus and the trial court was in a better position to judge of the credibility of the witnesses than we are, and when the findings of the trial court are accorded the weight of the verdict of a jury, we do not feel warranted in disturbing the judgment based upon such findings. Hackett v. Cash, 196 Ala. 403, 72 South. 52; Finney v. Studebaker, 196 Ala. 422, 72 South. 54.

Affirmed.

1

 Ante, p. 231.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Student
Advantage, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, Sevim M.
Perry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: August 14, 2003                       /s/ Sevim M. Perry
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Sevim M. Perry
                                             Chief Financial Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 20, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 20, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21I0167. HEART OF GEORGIA CARDIOLOGY, LLC v. DONNA SHAHEEN 

KEIFER .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

18C02928
#### Edwin J. O’Rourke, Appellant, *v.*William Hutton, Jr., as Commissioner of Public Safety of the City of Troy, Respondent.

Submitted June 4, 1937;

decided July 13, 1937.

*489
      *James A. McCarthy*for appellant.

*Frank S. Parmenter, Corporation Counsel (John P. Judge*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: O’Brien, J.
(77 South. 1002)

#### COX v. HOLCOMB.

(6 Div. 405.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 29, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County; C. P. Almon, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.