alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 11 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 11

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
 clarify that the Constitution neither prohibits voluntary prayer nor 
                      requires prayer in schools.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2007

  Mr. Byrd (for himself, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Cochran, 
   Mrs. Dole, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Lott, and Mr. Isakson) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
 clarify that the Constitution neither prohibits voluntary prayer nor 
                      requires prayer in schools.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Nothing in this Constitution, including any amendment to this 
Constitution, shall be construed to prohibit voluntary prayer or 
require prayer in a public school, or to prohibit voluntary prayer or 
require prayer at a public school extracurricular activity.''.
                                 <all>
```
**SECTION      32.0**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period covered by the                Report. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Michael H. Head                   |
|------------------------------------------------------|
| Michael                H. Head                       |
| President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                                 |
| /s/                George J. Smith                   |
| George                J. Smith                       |
| Treasurer                and Chief Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit 4.6


 


	1	INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE	100


 


MACQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION


 


See Reverse for


Transfer Instructions


 


Total Authorized Issue


100 Shares of Special Stock


$0.001 Par Value


 


This
is to Certify that _________________is the owner of


_______________________fully
paid and non-assessable shares of the above Corporation transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof
in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.


 


Witness,
the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized
officers.


 


Dated 


  


	 	 	 
	James Hooke, Chief Executive Officer	 	Michael Kernan, Secretary
§ 1960.80 Secretary's evaluations of agency occupational safety and health programs. ( a ) In accordance with section 1-401(h), the Secretary shall develop a comprehensive program for evaluating an agency's occupational safety and health program. To accomplish this, the Secretary shall conduct: ( 1 ) A complete and extensive evaluation of all elements of an agency's occupational safety and health program on a regular basis;
( 2 ) Special studies of limited areas of an agency's occupational safety and health program as deemed necessary by the Secretary; and
( 3 ) Field reviews and scheduled inspections of agency workplaces as deemed necessary by the Secretary.
( b ) The Secretary shall develop and distribute to Federal agencies detailed information on the Department of Labor's evaluation program. The information shall include, but is not limited to: ( 1 ) The major program elements included in a complete and extensive evaluation of an agency's occupational safety and health program;
( 2 ) The methods and factors used to determine the effectiveness of each element of an agency's program;
( 3 ) The factors used to define “large” or “more hazardous” Federal agencies, establishments, or operations;
( 4 ) The procedures for conducting evaluations including field visits and scheduled inspections; and
( 5 ) The reporting format for agency heads in submitting annual summaries of their self-evaluation programs.
( c ) Prior to the initiation of an agency evaluation, the Department of Labor will review the annual agency self-evaluation summary report. The Secretary will then develop a program evaluation plan before the initiation of an agency evaluation. A copy of the plan shall be furnished to the agency to be evaluated at the time of the notification of the evaluation.
( d ) To facilitate the evaluation process and to insure full understanding of the procedures to be followed and the support required from the agency, the Secretary, or the Secretary's representative, shall conduct an opening conference with the agency head or designee. At the opening conference, the Secretary's authority and evaluation plan will be explained.
( e ) The agency evaluation should be completed within 90 calendar days of the date of the opening conference.
( f ) A report of the evaluation shall be submitted to the agency head by the Secretary within 90 calendar days from the date of the closing conference.
( g ) Agency heads shall respond to the evaluation report within 60 calendar days of receipt of the report.
[45 FR 69798, Oct. 21, 1980; 45 FR 77003, Nov. 21, 1980]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12863]



[[Page 33314]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-222-001]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 17, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 11, 2000, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing in its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets proposed to be effective 
Marcy 27, 2000:

Substitute Fifth Revised Sheet No. 286
Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet No. 288

    Northern states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's Order of April 26, 2000 in Docket No. RP00-222-000. 
Northern is filing revised tariff sheets to clarify that there are no 
maximum rates for short-term capacity releases, that all releases for 
more than one month must be posted, and to include the sunset date of 
September 30, 2002, for the price cap waiver.
    Northern further states that copies of the filing have been mailed 
to each of its customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. 
This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-12863 Filed 5-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### § 2200.108 Official Seal of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

The seal of the Commission shall consist of: A gold eagle outspread, head facing dexter, a shield with 13 vertical stripes superimposed on its breast, holding an olive branch in its claws, the whole superimposed over a plain solid white Greek cross with a green background, encircled by a white band edged in black and inscribed “Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission” in black letters.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00008-CV

RALPH ADAMS AND ALL OTHER 

OCCUPANTS OF 2557 MARINA 

DRIVE, GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS 

75054

APPELLANT

V.

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE 

ASSOCIATION AKA FANNIE MAE

APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On June 20, 2012, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as 

required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 

38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless 

appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J., and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: July 19, 2012
# Official Journal C 169A/29 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 169A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4729 June 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 169A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4729 June 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 169A/1 | DG Health and Consumer Protection — Publication of a vacancy for Principal Advisor (Article 29(1a) and 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/100/04 | 1 |
| 2004/C 169A/2 | DG Taxation and Customs Union — Publication of a vacancy for Principal Advisor (Article 29(1a) and29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/101/04 | 4 |
| 2004/C 169A/3 | DG External Relations — Publication of a vacancy for Principal Advisor (Article 29(1a) and 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/102/04 | 7 |
| 2004/C 169A/4 | Publication of a vacancy for Director (Article 29(1a) and 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/157/04 | 10 |
| 2004/C 169A/5 | Cancellation COM/097/04 | 12 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Commission

2004/C 169A/1

DG Health and Consumer Protection — Publication of a vacancy for Principal Advisor (Article 29(1a) and 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/100/04

1

2004/C 169A/2

DG Taxation and Customs Union — Publication of a vacancy for Principal Advisor (Article 29(1a) and29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/101/04

4

2004/C 169A/3

DG External Relations — Publication of a vacancy for Principal Advisor (Article 29(1a) and 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/102/04

7

2004/C 169A/4

Publication of a vacancy for Director (Article 29(1a) and 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/157/04

10

2004/C 169A/5

Cancellation COM/097/04

12

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 20 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 20

To disapprove a final rule of the Secretary of Agriculture relating to 
                  the importation of cattle and beef.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 3, 2007

Mr. Dorgan (for himself, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Thune, 
Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Brown, and Mr. Tester) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
To disapprove a final rule of the Secretary of Agriculture relating to 
                  the importation of cattle and beef.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Secretary of Agriculture relating to bovine 
spongiform encephalopathy, minimal-risk regions, and importation of 
live bovines and products derived from bovines (72 Fed. Reg. 53314 
(2007)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
#### Laurence H. Rutland, Respondent, *v.*Henry F. Thurston, Appellant.

Submitted March 24, 1937;

decided April 27, 1937.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 273 N. Y. 543.)
#### SKYLINE SASH, INC., a Corporation of Pennsylvania, and a Citizen of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, a Citizen of the State of New York, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. T. K. JACOB, Third-Party Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, Appellant, v. GROOMES CORPORATION, Third-Party Defendant.

No. 16252.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued April 17, 1967.

Decided April 24, 1967.

Rehearing Denied May 17, 1967.

T. K. Jacob, pro se (Robert E. Fulton, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

George F. Taylor, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee Skyline Sash, Inc.

Robert F. McCabe, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee Fidelity and Casualty Co.

John G. Kish, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee, Groomers Corp.

Before SMITH and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges, and WORTENDYKE, District Judge.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The district court dismissed with prejudice the plaintiff’s action against the defendant in accordance with the settlement agreement of the parties. It dismissed without prejudice the third party actions as a result of which any claims which the third parties have inter sese may still be submitted for judicial determination. Indeed we were informed at bar that new actions were thereafter instituted to maintain these claims and are now pending.

Our review of the record leaves no doubt that appellant agreed to the settlement of the plaintiff’s claims. It is equally clear that whatever claim he may have as between himself and the other parties to the third party action were reserved to him by the dismissal of the third party actions without prejudice.

In these circumstances, therefore, the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.
#### John Snow and Alden Bryant, Plaintiffs in Error, *vs.*Roswell B. Johnson, Defendant in Error.

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY.

The facts in controversy, and the point ruled in this case, appears sufficiently from the opinion of the Court.

Bice, Hollinsiiead & Becker, for Plaintiffs in Error.

M. S. "Wilkinson and Nelson, for Defendants in Error.

*By the Court.*

Goodrich, Chief Justice.

This is an action of assumpsit, brought in the Court below by the Defendant in Error, against the Plaintiffs in Error, upon a verbal contract, in and by which it is alleged that the plaintiffs in Error agreed to pay one half of the expense of constructing a certain wharf in the town of Stillwater. To which the defendants below pleaded *non assumpsit.*

The cause was submitted to a Jury under the charge of the Court, who, on the 12th day of February, 1850, found for the plaintiff a verdict for $32,50 and costs; for the reversal of which this Writ of Error is brought. It appears from the evidence, that about the 1st of August, 1848, Johnson contracted with one Perry Edwards for the construction of a wharf, at and for the sum of $200. That Edwards was prosecuting the work which he afterwards abandoned at Johnson’s request. It further appears, that while the work was in progress, Snow and Bryant agreed to pay one half of the expense of its construction. That afterwards, and during the month of August, Johnson paid Edwards $65, to recover one half of which this suit was brought. On the trial in tlio Court below, defendants offered to prove by Socrates Nelson, that the work was *40not worth the amount paid Edwards by Johnson. The Court overruled this offer, and rejected the evidence of Nelson; to which ruling of the Court defendants excepted. We think, that in this the Court erred, and that this exception was well taken.

If defendants are to be compelled to bear a paid of Johnson’s debt to Edwards, it would be oppressive not to permit them to show what amount was justly due, or paid to Edwards. When the contract was abandoned, the *amowrvt*of work done by Edwards, and its value, was clearly the subject of proof, and had Johnson refused to pay Edwards, he would have resorted to the law, and recovered upon his proof. Johnson would have had an undoubted right to adduce evidence tending to reduce the amount of Edwards’ claim; and if Snow *&*Bryant are to be brought into contribution, they must be permitted to protect themselves against collusion between Johnson and Edwards.

Give them the control of this matter; close the door against Snow *&*Bryant, and they are at the mercy of Johnson and Edwards, who may mulct them in any amount they choose. Such a proceeding cannot be sanctioned by this Court. It matters not what amount Johnson paid to Edwards.

The legitimate inquiry is, what amount did Johnson *rightfully*pay Edwards ?

This Court will not lay down the rule, that when a party is sued for money, he shall not be allowed, by way of defence, to prove that the amount demanded is unjust and extortionate.

The judgment of the Court below is reversed with costs ; and this cause remanded where a new trial may be had.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

11 a.m., Friday, June 2, 2000.

# PLACE:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Surveillance Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-12358  Filed 5-12-00; 11:31 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Visualant, Incorporated on Form 10-Q for
the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald P. Erickson, Chief
Executive Officer, President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge  and  belief:





(1)  the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and





(2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.











/s/
Ronald P. Erickson


Ronald P.
Erickson


Chief
Executive Officer, President and Director








Date:  February
11, 2010
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Gary D. Woerz,
CFO of American International Industries, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

I, Gary D. Woerz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form
10-QSB of American International Industries, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, 
I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the undersigned by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as
of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report management's conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors:

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.  I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 15, 2005, 
Gary D. Woerz
Chief Financial Officer/s/ Gary D. Woerz