alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00097-CR

WILLIAM DALE CULPEPPER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 76th District Court

Camp County, Texas

Trial Court No. 05-086

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

William Dale Culpepper attempts to appeal an order denying his motion for forensic 

DNA testing. Culpepper’s motion for forensic DNA testing was filed June 25, 2012, and the 

order denying that motion was signed July 9, 2012. Culpepper’s notice of appeal was filed 

May 22, 2013, and the clerk’s record was filed with this Court on May 31, 2013. The issue 

before us is whether Culpepper perfected his appeal. We conclude that he did not and dismiss 

the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 

918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Pursuant to Rule 26 of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure, Culpepper had thirty days after the date the order denying his motion for 

forensic DNA testing was signed in which to timely file a notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

26.

The order from which Culpepper appeals was signed July 9, 2012, and Culpepper’s 

notice of appeal was filed May 22, 2013, over ten months after the order was signed. 

Consequently, Culpepper has failed to perfect his appeal. See id. Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: June 18, 2013

Date Decided: June 19, 2013.

Do Not Publish
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 917 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 917

 To clarify the authority of the Secretary of the Interior with regard 
         to management of elk in Rocky Mountain National Park.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 19, 2007

  Mr. Allard introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the authority of the Secretary of the Interior with regard 
         to management of elk in Rocky Mountain National Park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MANAGEMENT OF ELK IN ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Management plan.--The term ``management plan'' means 
        the elk and vegetation management plan for the Park described 
        in the draft environmental impact statement dated April 2006.
            (2) Park.--The term ``Park'' means Rocky Mountain National 
        Park.
            (3) Qualified individual.--The term ``qualified 
        individual'' means any individual who possesses--
                    (A) a valid resident big-game hunting license 
                issued by the State of Colorado; and
                    (B) such other qualifications as the Secretary, in 
                consultation with the Colorado Division of Wildlife, 
                may establish.
            (4) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.
    (b) Use of Services.--Nothing in section 4 of the Act of March 2, 
1929 (16 U.S.C. 198c), or any other applicable law, prohibits the 
Secretary from using the services of qualified individuals, as 
volunteers or pursuant to a contract with the Secretary, to assist in 
carrying out the management plan by using lethal means to reduce the 
population of elk within the Park.
    (c) Consultation.--The Secretary shall consult with the Colorado 
Division of Wildlife regarding potential participation by the Division 
of Wildlife in carrying out the management plan.
    (d) Limitation.--Nothing in this section applies to a taking of 
wildlife (within the meaning of section 3 of the Endangered Species Act 
of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1532)) within the Park for any purpose other than 
the implementation of the management plan.
                                 <all>
```
#### Brooklyn and Queens Transit Corporation, Respondent, *v.*City of New York, Appellant.

Argued June 10, 1937;

decided July 13, 1937.

*455
      *Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel (Paxton Blair, Oscar S. Cox, Sol Charles Levine*and *Meyer Bernstein*of counsel), for appellant.

*Harold L. Warner, Henry Root Stern, Paul D. Miller*and *George D. Yeomans*for respondent.

Orders reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts. Question certified answered in the negative on the authority of *New York Rapid Transit Corp.*v. *City of New York*(275 N. Y. 258). No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: O’Brien, J.
EXHIBIT 21

                     KEYSTONE CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES, INC.
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                    Jurisdiction of               Percent of
                                    Incorporation             Voting Securities
      Name of corporation           or organization                 held (1)

Sherman Wire of Caldwell, Inc.         Nevada                       100.0%

Fox Valley Steel and Wire Company      Wisconsin                    100.0%

Sherman Wire Company (2)               Delaware                     100.0%
  J.L. Prescott Company                New Jersey                   100.0%
  DeSoto Environmental
   Management, Inc.                    Delaware                     100.0%

Engineered Wire Products, Inc.         Ohio                         100.0%

Garden Zone LLC                        Delaware                     51.0%

(1) Held by the Registrant or the indicated subsidiary of the Registrant.

(2) Formerly DeSoto, Inc.
# Condensing Heating and Water Heating Equipment Workshop

Location: Washington Gas Light Appliance Training Facility

6801 Industrial Road

Springfield, VA

Date: October 9, 2014

Time: 10:00 am

– 12:30 pm EDT

Purpose: To convene representatives from stakeholder organizations in order to enhance their

understanding of the characteristics of condensing natural gas heating and water heating equipment

that contr ibute to the unique installation requirements and challenges of this equipment compared to

non

- condensing equipment. To enable group discussion on potential reactions from consumers and

contractors on new furnace standards and explore technology and other options for addressing

identified challenges and achieving energy efficiency objectives. A common foundational knowledge

should enhance the dialogue for all parties in DOE rulemaking proceedings relative to this type of

equipment.

AGENDA

I. Welcome, Intro ductions and Opening Comments from American Gas Association and Washington

Gas Light Representatives including:

 Industry and Washington Gas Company’s Commitment to Energy Efficiency

 High Level Overview on Results from Contractor/Builder Survey

 Review and D iscussion on Available Heating and Water Heating Equipment Options

 Review of EIA Date on Equipment Trends and Energy Prices

II. Technical Review and Discussion on Condensing and Non

- Condensing Furnaces

 Review of Key Components of Condensing and Non

- Condensing Furnaces

 Review Venting Requirements of Condensing and Non

- Condensing Furnaces

 Installation Challenges with Various Building Types

 Impact on Water Heating Equipment

III. Market Impacts and Technology Solutions Discussion

 Discussion on Potential Reactions from Consumers and Contractors from New Efficiency

Standards for Natural Gas Furnaces

 Discussion on Potential Impact of Consumer/Contractor Reactions on Energy Cost,

Consumption and Emissions

 Discussion on Technology Solutions to Address Potential Issues of a N ew Furnace Standard

 Discussion on Other Options to Achieve Energy and Emissions Reduction Objective from

Heating Systems

IV. Next Steps and Closing Comments

 Opportunities for Working Together to Understand Data and Market Intelligence and

address any potenti al Gaps

 Opportunities for Working Together to Advance Technology Solutions

 Opportunities for Working Together on Efficiency Solutions Beyond Equipment Standards
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**EXPRESS
      SYSTEMS CORPORATION**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**









In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Express Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard
      Brown, Principal Accounting Officer, Principal Financial Officer,
      and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
      my
      knowledge:







1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.










/s/
      Richard Brown


Richard
      Brown


Principal
      Accounting Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Director




November
      2, 2005
#### § 4000.41 What are these computation-of-time rules about?

The rules in this subpart D of part 4000 tell you how to compute time periods under our regulations (e.g., for filings with us and issuances to third parties) where the particular regulation calls for their application. (There are specific exceptions or modifications to these rules in § 4007.6 of this chapter (premium payments), and § 4062.10 of this chapter (employer liability payments). In some cases, the PBGC regulations tell you to comply with requirements that are found somewhere other than in the PBGC's own regulations (e.g., requirements under the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26, USC)). In meeting those requirements, you should follow any applicable computation-of-time rules under those other requirements. (Subpart A tells you what filing methods you may use for filings with us. Subpart B tells you what methods you may use to issue a notice or otherwise provide information to any person other than us. Subpart C tells you how we determine your filing or issuance date. Subpart E tells you how to maintain required records in electronic form.)

[68 FR 61347, Oct. 28, 2003, as amended at 82 FR 60817, Dec. 22, 2017]
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Mark E. Woodward, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SERENA Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SERENA Software, Inc. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to SERENA Software, Inc. and will be retained by SERENA Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



By:

/s/    Mark E. WoodwardMark E. Woodward President and Chief
Executive Officer And Director




Date: December 8, 2003



I, Robert I. Pender, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SERENA Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SERENA Software, Inc. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to SERENA Software, Inc. and will be retained by SERENA Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



By:

/s/    Robert I. Pender, Jr.Robert I. Pender, Jr. Vice President,
Finance And Administration, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial And Accounting Officer) And Director




Date: December 8, 2003
#### CITY OF TUSCALOOSA v. HARRIS.

(Decided November 23, 1915.)

Appeal from Tuscaloosa County Court.

Heard before Hon. H. B. FOSTER.

Brown & Ward, for appellant. Clarkson & Morisette, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 15

- 00108

- CV

J. R. and L. R., Appellant s

v.
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. C2013

- 1122B, HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant s J.R. and L.R. filed their notice s of appeal on February 12, 2015 and

February 26, 2015, respectively

. The appellate record was complete February 26, 2015 , making

appellant s ’ brief

s due March 18, 2015

. To date, appellant s ’ brief s have not been filed.

Amendments to the rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition

of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a)

(providing 180 days f

or court’s f

inal disposition). The accelerated schedule requires greater

compliance with br iefing deadlines. Therefore we order Paul A. Finley and Manuel C.
Rodriguez to file appellant s ’ brief s no later than April 14, 2015 . If the brief s are not filed by that

date, counsel may be required to show cause why they should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on March 25, 2015

.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton
, and Bourland
```

[115th Congress Public Law 227]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 1626]]

Public Law 115-227
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act 
      of 2010 to clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement 
               Fund. <<NOTE: Aug. 1, 2018 -  [S. 2850]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. USE OF FUNDS IN WMAT SETTLEMENT FUND FOR WMAT RURAL 
                              WATER SYSTEM.

    (a) Authorization of WMAT Rural Water System.--Section 307(a) of the 
White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2010 
(Public Law 111-291; 124 Stat. 3080) is amended in the matter preceding 
paragraph (1) by inserting ``, (b)(2),'' after ``subsections (a)''.
    (b) Funding.--Section 312(b)(2)(C)(i)(III) of the White Mountain 
Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-
291; 124 Stat. 3093) is amended by striking the period at the end and 
inserting the following: ``, including the planning, design, and 
construction of the WMAT rural water system, in accordance with section 
307(a).''.
SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF PUEBLO OF SANTA CLARA LAND ELIGIBLE FOR 99-
                    YEAR LEASE.

    Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of August 9, 1955 
(commonly known as the ``Long-Term Leasing Act'') (25 U.S.C. 415(a)), is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``Indians,,'' and inserting ``Indians,'';
            (2) by inserting ``Ohkay Owingeh pueblo,'' after 
        ``Cochiti,'';
            (3) by inserting ``the pueblo of Santa Clara,'' after 
        ``Pojoaque,'';
            (4) by striking ``the the lands'' and inserting ``the 
        land'';
            (5) by striking ``lands held in trust for the Pueblo of 
        Santa Clara,''; and

[[Page 132 STAT. 1627]]

            (6) by striking ``lands held in trust for Ohkay Owingeh 
        Pueblo''.

    Approved August 1, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2850:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            July 18, considered and passed Senate.
            July 23, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
§ 35.26 Recipient assessment of age distinctions. ( a ) In order to assess a recipient's compliance with the Act and this part, as part of a compliance or monitoring review, or a complaint investigation, CRC may require a recipient employing the equivalent of 15 or more full-time employees to complete a written self-evaluation, in a manner specified by CRC, of any age distinction imposed in its program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance from DOL.
( b ) Whenever such an assessment indicates a violation of the Act or this part, the recipient shall take prompt and appropriate corrective action.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Cooper, Appellant.

[697 NYS2d 523]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Katz, J.), rendered March 31, 1998, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), and reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was denied a fair trial due to comments made by the prosecutor during summation is without merit. Krausman, J. P., McGinity, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.
WANT & ENDER, C.P.A., P.C.,
                          Certified Public Accountants

Martin Ender, C.P.A.
Stanley Z. Want, C.P.A., C.F.P.

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Dear Sirs:

    We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
Form S-8 of our report dated September 3, 1999 with respect to the  consolidated
financial  statements of eNote.com,  Inc.  included in eNote.com,  Inc.'s Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999.

                                               /s/
                                               -----------------------------
                                               Martin Ender, C.P.A.

Want & Ender, C.P.A., P.C.,
September 9, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                        (30,854)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  936,138
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     83,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,377,257
<PP&E>                                         301,440
<DEPRECIATION>                                (47,277)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,556,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          960,725
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,789,622
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,556,225
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,512
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  416,815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,117
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                427,420
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (427,420)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.005)


</TABLE>
10.1 JS Agmt








FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


WHEREAS, Amtech Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) and Jong S. Whang (the “Executive”) entered into a Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated February 9, 2012 (with all subsequent amendments thereto, the “Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to further modify the Agreement and to enter in this Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Fourth Amendment”) in order to (i) clarify certain language in Section 4 of the Agreement, (ii) extend the Executive’s Initial Term for an additional three years, and (iii) increase the amount of D&O liability insurance maintained by the Company for the benefit of the Executive to $10,000,000.
 
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following Fourth Amendment, to be effective as of the date set forth below, with all unmodified portions of the Agreement to remain in full force and effect:


1.    Section 4(b) is hereby amended to delete the following language from the second sentence:  “..., but shall be no less favorable to the Executive than the amounts and terms of the grant approved by the Compensation Committee on November 20, 2009.”  


2.    The first sentence of Section 7 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: “The “Employment Period” shall commence on the date of this Agreement (the “Effective Date”) and shall continue for an initial term of six (6) years (the “Initial Term”).”


3.    In the first sentence of Section 14, the reference to “$5,000,000” shall be replaced with “$10,000,000”.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Fourth Amendment as of April 9, 2015.




AMTECH SYSTEMS, INC.


By: /s/ Bradley C. Anderson
Name: Bradley C. Anderson
Title:     Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer






By: /s/ Jong S. Whang
Name: Jong S. Whang
Title:   Executive
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2014-0921

Directorate Identifier: 2014NM073AD

747-53A2860 --- 12/4/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008