alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$30,000.00                                                      January 17, 2002

For value received, the undersigned, Coinless Systems, Inc. ("the Promisor"),
promises to pay upon demand to the order of Dennis W. and/or Janice Sorenson
("the Payee") located at 1124 Sable Mist Court, Las Vegas, NV 89144 (or at such
other place as the Payee may designate in writing) the sum of $30,000.00 with
interest from January 17, 2002 on the unpaid principal at a rate of 8.5%
interest per annum.

All payments on this Note shall be applied first in payment of accrued interest
and any remainder in payment of principal.

The Promisor reserves the right to prepay this Note (in whole or in part) prior
to the due date with no prepayment penalty.

If any payment obligation under this Note is not paid when demanded, the
Promisor promises to pay all costs of collection, including reasonable attorney
fees, whether or not a lawsuit is commenced as part of the collection process.

If any of the following events of default occur, this Note shall become due
immediately, without demand or notice:

1)     the failure of the Promisor to pay the principal and any accrued interest
       in full upon demand;

2)     the filing of bankruptcy proceedings involving the Promisor as a Debtor;

3)     the application for appointment of a receiver for the Promisor;

4)     the making of a general assignment for the benefit of the Promisor's
       creditors;

5)     the insolvency of the Promisor; or

6)     the misrepresentation by the Promisor to the Payee for the purpose of
       obtaining or extending credit; or

7)     the sale or merger of Corporation.

                                       34





<PAGE>

If any or more of the provisions of this Note are determined to be
unenforceable, in whole or in part, for any reason, the remaining provisions
shall remain fully operative.

All payments of principal and interest on this Note shall be paid in the legal
currency of the United States. Promisor waives presentment of payment, protest,
and notice of protest and nonpayment on this Note.

No renewal or extension of this Note, delay in enforcing any right of the Payee
under this Note, or assignment by Payee of this Note shall affect the liability
of the Promisor. All rights of the Payee under this Note are cumulative and may
be exercised concurrently or consecutively at the Payee's option.

Payee may, at their option, convert this note into Common Stock of CSI, as per
Resolution of the Board of Directors, dated February 4, 2000.

This Note shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Nevada.

Signed this 17th day of January 2002 in Las Vegas, Nevada.

PROMISOR
Coinless Systems, Inc.

By:   /S/  DARRYL D. DORSETT
    -------------------------
       Darryl D. Dorsett
       Chief Financial Officer

                                       35
[No. 20330-1-III.

Division Three.

November 19, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. William Winks Winnier, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 01-1-00515-0, James P. Hutton, J., entered June 6, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, C.J., concurred in by Schultheis and Kurtz, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.23

LEISURE CONCEPTS INCORPORATED

January 22, 1999

Mr. Michael Balber
Littlefield, Adams & Company
6262 Executive Blvd.
Huber Heights, OH 45424

Dear Mr. Balber:

         This has reference to the World Championship Wrestling agreement
between World Championship Wrestling, Inc. ("Licensor") and Littlefield, Adams &
Company ("Licensee") dated February 27, 1998, covering the WCW/NWO Property
(hereinafter the "License Agreement"). The License Agreement is amended as
follows.

1. It is understood and agreed that Paragraph 2: Authorized Articles is hereby
revised in its entirety to read as follows:

         "Authorized Articles:      Knit shirts, tank tops, muscle shirts, 
                                    henley shirts, sweatshirts, long-sleeve 
                                    shirts, t-shirts, denim long and short
                                    sleeve shirts, chambray long and short 
                                    sleeve shirts."

2. It is understood and agreed that Paragraph 6: Royalty Rate is hereby revised
in its entirety to read as follows:

         "Royalty Rate:             10% Net Sales    (knit shirts; tank tops; 
                                                     muscle shirts; henley 
                                                     shirts; sweatshirts; 
                                                     long-sleeve shirts; and 
                                                     t-shirts)

                                    12% Net Sales    (denim long and short 
                                                     sleeve shirts; and chambray
                                                     long and short sleeve
                                                     shirts)"

         Except as herein provided all terms and conditions of the License
Agreement remain in full force and effect. Please indicate your agreement with
the foregoing by signing where specified below and by returning all four copies
of this amendment to Stella Guzman at the address below. A fully executed copy
will be returned to you in due course.

Accepted and Agreed to:                             Very truly yours,
Littlefield, Adams and Company                      World Championship
("Licensee")                                        Wrestling, Inc.  
                                                    ("Licensor")
                                                    By: /s/ Casey T. Collins
By: /s/ Michael Balber                              
    Michael Balber
    President: and
       Chief Executive Officer


    LEISURE CONCEPTS INC.(R) 1414 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS NEW YORK, NY 10019
                       (212) 758-7666 - FAX (212) 980-0933

NEW YORK                         LONDON                              LOS ANGELES
Exhibit 32.2
                                  ------------

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001.

                        --------------------------------


In connection with the Quarterly Report of NORD OIL INTERNATIONAL, INC.(the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jean-Francois Amyot, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 28, 2005


        /s/ Jean-Francois Amyot
        ---------------------------------
        Jean-Francois Amyot
        Chief Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32   Section 1350
Certifications.

---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of First Capital Bank Holding Corporation (the
Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ending June 30, 2004 as
          filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | By:    /s/ Michael G. Sanchez    
         Michael G. Sanchez         Chief
Executive Officer         August 14, 2004
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | By:    /s/ Timothy S. Ayers    
          Timothy S. Ayers          Chief Financial Officer
          August 14, 2004
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-4019 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ZACHARY JEREMIAH HOOVER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,

District Judge. (CR-05-75)

Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 3, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M.

Hayes, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys,

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Zachary J. Hoover appeals the 18-month sentence imposed

after he pled guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to a criminal

information charging him with sexual abuse of a minor, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 2243(a) (2000). We affirm.

Hoover’s sole argument on appeal is that the Government

breached the plea agreement by stating to the court at sentencing

that the court did not need to decide whether Hoover should

register as a sex offender. Hoover did not object below, and he

must therefore demonstrate plain error before he can obtain any

relief. See United States v. Fant, 974 F.2d 559, 562 (4th Cir.

1992) (applying plain error analysis in context of breach of plea

agreement). In order to do so, Hoover must establish the breach

was “‘so obvious and substantial that failure to notice and correct

it affect[ed] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of the

judicial proceedings.’” United States v. McQueen, 108 F.3d 64, 66

(4th Cir. 1997) (quoting Fant, 974 F.2d at 565). Our review of the

record convinces us that the Government did not breach the plea

agreement in responding to the district court’s questions at

sentencing.

Accordingly, we affirm Hoover’s sentence. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
- 3 -

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7578** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. MICHAEL DAVID TURNER, a/k/a Michael David Bunch , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Arenda L. Wright Allen , District Judge. ( 2:07

- cr - 00040

- AWA

- TEM

- 1; 2:12

- cv - 00468

- AWA )

Submitted : March 25, 2014 Decided: March 27, 2014

Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Michael David Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin L. Hatch, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
M i chael David Turner seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion because Turner failed to obtain prefiling authorization from this c ourt . The order is not appe alable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2 ) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDani el , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Turner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
(77 South. 967)

#### THOMPSON v. STATE.

(3 Div. 311.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Feb. 5, 1918.)

Criminal Law <&wkey;120S(3) — Sentence — Imprisonment por Default in Payment of Pine and Costs.

"Under Code 1907, § 7634, prescribing the term of punishment on default in payment of fine and costs in misdemeanor cases, and providing that if the fine does not exceed $20. the term of imprisonment or hard labor shall be for 10 days, where the jury found defendant guilty of vagrancy as charged, and assessed a fine of $15, tlie court improperly imposed sentence, for default in payment of fine, of 30 days.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; Leon McCord, Judge.

O. J. Thompson was convicted of vagrancy, and he appeals.

Affirmed, and cause remanded for proper sentence.

W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the offense of being a vagrant, and from the judgment of conviction appeals to this court. This appeal is on the record; no bill of exceptions having been presented or filed. The verdict of the jury, as disclosed by tbe record, is:

> “We, the jury, find the defendant guilty as charged and assess a fine of $15.”

Section 7634 of the Code of 1907 prescribes the term of punishment on default in payment of fine and costs in misdemeanor cases. Under this section of the Code, the court imposed an improper sentence, the. statute expressly providing that, if the fine does not exceed $20, the term of imprisonment or hard labor shall he for 10 days. The sentence imposed in this case as shown by the record was 30 days, which necessitates that the case be remanded for proper sentence as provided by law. No error of a reversible nature appears in tbe record, and tbe judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Judgment of conviction affirmed. Remanded for proper sentence.
#### Elizabeth F. Vilkomerson, Appellant, *v.*Tri-State Investors Corporation et al., Respondents.

Submitted September 27, 1937;

decided October 5, 1937.

*Samuel Meyers*for motion.

*Robert H. Elder*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion, unless undertaking is filed and served before November 15, 1937, in which event the motion is denied.
§ 2570.12 Procedures for review by the Secretary. ( a ) Upon receipt of a notice of appeal, the Secretary shall establish a briefing schedule which shall be served on all parties of record. Upon motion of one or more of the parties, the Secretary may, in his discretion, permit the submission of reply briefs.
( b ) The Secretary shall issue a decision as promptly as possible after receipt of the briefs of the parties. The Secretary may affirm, modify, or set aside, in whole or in part, the decision on appeal and shall issue a statement of reasons and bases for the action(s) taken. Such decision by the Secretary shall be final agency action within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 704.
(75 South. 1007)

#### WILLINGHAM v. STATE.

(7 Div. 466.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 8, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Randolph County; Thomas W. Wert, Judge. Tom Willingham was convicted of violation of the prohibition law, and appeals.

Affirmed.

W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMEORD, J.

The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted for a violation of the prohibition law, and from the judgment of conviction he appeals. We find no error in the rulings of the court on the evidence, and there is no error in the record. Oldacre v. State, ante, p. 151, 75 South. 827. The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
[No. 20218-6-III.

Division Three.

October 29, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Kara Dawn Spies, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 01-1-00329-2, Tari S. Eitzen, J., entered May 23, 2001. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, J., concurred in by Brown, C.J., and Schultheis, J.
#### § 406.6 Relation of section 8(c) of the National Labor Relations Act to this part.

While nothing contained in section 203 of the Act shall be construed as an amendment to, or modification of the rights protected by, section 8(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended (61 Stat. 142; 29 U.S.C. 158 (c)), activities protected by such section of the said Act are not for that reason exempted from the reporting requirements of this part and, if otherwise subject to such reporting requirements, are required to be reported. Consequently, information required to be included in Forms LM-20 and 21 must be reported regardless of whether that information relates to activities which are protected by section 8(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended.
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

#### § 4.103 The Act.

The McNamara-O'Hara Service Contract Act of 1965 (Pub. L. 89-286, 79 Stat. 1034, 41 U.S.C. 351 *et seq.*), hereinafter referred to as the Act, was approved by the President on October 22, 1965 (1 Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents 428). It establishes standards for minimum compensation and safety and health protection of employees performing work for contractors and subcontractors on service contracts entered into with the Federal Government and the District of Columbia. It applies to contracts entered into pursuant to negotiations concluded or invitations for bids issued on or after January 20, 1966. It has been amended by Public Law 92-473, 86 Stat. 798; by Public Law 93-57, 87 Stat. 140; and by Public Law 94-489, 90 Stat. 2358.
# EUR-Lex - 32000R1436 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R1436

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1436/2000 of 30 June 2000 fixing the final amount of aid for dried fodder for the 1999/2000 marketing year **

*
Official Journal L 161 , 01/07/2000 P. 0061 - 0061 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1436/2000

of 30 June 2000

fixing the final amount of aid for dried fodder for the 1999/2000 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 603/95 of 21 February 1995 on the common organisation of the market in dried fodder(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1347/95(2), and in particular Article 18 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 3(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 603/95 fix the amounts of aid to be paid to processors for dehydrated fodder and sun-dried fodder produced during the 1999/2000 marketing year up to the maximum guaranteed quantities laid down in Article 4(1) and (3) of that Regulation.

(2) The information forwarded to the Commission by the Member States under the second indent of Article 15(a) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 785/95 of 6 April 1995 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 603/95 on the common organisation of the market in dried fodder(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 676/1999(4), indicates that the maximum guaranteed quantity for dehydrated fodder has been exceeded, and that the maximum guaranteed quantity for sun-dried fodder has not been exceeded.

(3) It should therefore be laid down that the aid provided for in Regulation (EC) No 603/95 for dehydrated fodder should be reduced in accordance with Article 5 of that Regulation. The aid for sun-dried fodder should be paid to recipients in full.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Dried Fodder,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The aid for dehydrated fodder and sun-dried fodder provided for in Article 3(2) and (3) respectively of Regulation (EC) No 603/95 shall be paid as follows for the 1999/2000 marketing year:

(a) the aid for dehydrated fodder shall be reduced to EUR 66,03 per tonne in all Member States;

(b) the aid for sun-dried fodder shall be paid in full.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 2000.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 63, 21.3.1995, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 131, 15.6.1995, p. 1.

(3) OJ L 79, 7.4.1995, p. 5.

(4) OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 40.
§ 4022.11 Guarantee of benefits relating to uniformed service. This section applies to a benefit of a participant who becomes reemployed after service in the uniformed services that is covered by the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA). ( a ) A benefit described in paragraph (b) of this section that would satisfy the requirements of § 4022.3(a) and (c) (together with any benefit earned for the period preceding military service) except for the fact that the participant was not reemployed on or before the termination date will be deemed to satisfy those requirements if PBGC determines, based upon a demonstration by the participant or otherwise, that he or she became reemployed after the termination date and entitled to the benefit under USERRA.
( b ) A benefit described in this paragraph (b) is a benefit attributable to a period of service commencing before the termination date and ending on the termination date during which the participant was serving in the uniformed services as defined in 38 U.S.C. 4303(13) (or was in a subsequent reemployment eligibility period) and to which the participant is entitled under USERRA.
( c ) Example: A plan's vesting requirement is 5 years of service with the employer. A participant has completed 4 years of service when he leaves employment for uniformed service. The plan terminates while the participant is in military service. As of the termination date, the participant would have had 5 years of service and 5 years of benefit accruals if he had remained continuously employed. Upon reemployment after the termination date but within the time limits set by USERRA, the participant would have had 6 years of service under the plan for vesting and benefit accrual purposes, if the plan had not terminated. PBGC would treat the participant as having a vested, nonforfeitable plan benefit with 5 years of vesting service and benefit accruals as of the termination date.
( d ) In the case of a PPA 2006 bankruptcy termination, “bankruptcy filing date” is substituted for “termination date” each place that “termination date” appears in this section.
[74 FR 59096, Nov. 17, 2009]