### 16400 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 51 / Friday, March 15, 2013 / Rules and Regulations

Paragraph 6005. Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700 feet or more above the surface of the earth.
* * * * *

AAL AK E5 Unalakleet, AK [Modified] Unalakleet Airport, AK

(Lat. 63 ° 53 ′ 19′′ N., long. 160 ° 47 ′ 57 ′′ W.) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius of Unalakleet Airport beginning at the 360 ° bearing of the airport clockwise to the 260 ° bearing of the airport, and within a 13.5-mile radius of Unalakleet Airport beginning at the
260 ° bearing of the airport clockwise to the
360 ° bearing of the airport, and within 6 miles each side of the Unalakleet Airport
185 ° bearing of the airport extending from the 7-mile radius to 10 miles south of the airport; and that airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface within a 74-mile radius of Unalakleet Airport.

Issued in Seattle, Washington, on December 31, 2012. Clark Desing, Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2013–05911 Filed 3–14–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 71**

**[Docket No. FAA–2012–0835; Airspace Docket No. 12–ANE–15]** 

**Amendment of Class E Airspace; Morrisville, VT** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This action amends Class E Airspace at Morrisville, VT, as the Morrisville-Stowe Non-Directional Beacon (NDB) has been decommissioned and new Standard Instrument Approach Procedures have been developed at Morrisville-Stowe State Airport. This action enhances the safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the airport.

**DATES :**  Effective 0901 UTC, May 2, 2013. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  John Fornito, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404)
305–6364.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  History

On December 21, 2012, the FAA published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking to amend Class E airspace at Morrisville, VT (77 FR 75596) Docket No. FAA–2012–0835. Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received. Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9W dated August 8, 2012, and effective September 15, 2012, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 amends the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Morrisville, VT, to accommodate the new Standard Instrument ApproachProcedures developed for MorrisvilleStowe State Airport . The MorrisvilleStowe NDB has been decommissioned, and the NDB approach cancelled. Accordingly, the extension of Class E airspace to the northeast of the airport based on the cancelled NDB is eliminated and the basic radius of controlled airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface is extended from 4 miles to 14.8 miles. This action is necessary due to the elevated terrain surrounding the airport.

The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative comments. It, therefore, (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority as it amends controlled airspace at Morrisville-Stowe State Airport, Morrisville, VT.

Environmental Review

The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’ paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an environmental assessment. Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air). Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

**PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR**  **TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS** 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 1963 Comp., p. 389.

**§ 71.1 [Amended]**

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation Administration Order 7400.9W, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2012, effective September 15, 2012, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700 feet or more above the surface of the earth.
* * * * *

ANE VT E5 Morrisville, VT [Amended] Morrisville-Stowe State Airport

(Lat. 44 ° 32 ′04′′ N., long. 72 ° 36 ′ 50′′ W.)


### 16401 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 51 / Friday, March 15, 2013 / Rules and Regulations

That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 14.8-mile radius of Morrisville-Stowe State Airport.

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on March 5, 2013. Barry A. Knight, Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2013–05910 Filed 3–14–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES** 

**Food and Drug Administration**

**21 CFR Part 56**

**[Docket No. FDA–2013–N–0003]**

**Institutional Review Boards; Correcting Amendments** 

**AGENCY :**  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

**ACTION :**  Final rule; correcting amendments.

**SUMMARY :**  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending its regulations regarding institutional review boards to address a minor correction to the regulatory text and to update contact information. This action is editorial in nature and is intended to provide accuracy and clarity to the Agency’s regulations.

**DATES :**  This final rule is effective March 15, 2013.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Kathleen Pfaender, Office of Special Medical Programs, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, Rm. 5172, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301–796–8346.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  FDA is amending 21 CFR part 56 to correct a minor error in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), and to update obsolete information. A minor spelling error was introduced inadvertently in the CFR when the regulations were first published. Also, contact information in the regulations is obsolete and in need of updating.

Publication of this document constitutes final action under the Administrative Procedures Act (5 U.S.C. 553). FDA has determined that notice and public comment are unnecessary because this amendment to the regulations provides only technical changes to correct minor errors and to update obsolete information, and is nonsubstantive. List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 56

Human research subjects, Reporting and reporting requirements, and Safety. Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 56 is amended as follows:

**PART 56—INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS** 

■ 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 56 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 343, 346, 346a, 348, 350a, 350b, 351, 352, 353, 355, 360, 360c–360f, 360h–360j, 371, 379e, 381; 42 U.S.C. 216, 241, 262, 263b–263n.

■ 2. In § 56.106 revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:

**§ 56.106 Registration.**
* * * * *

(d) Where can an IRB register ? Each IRB may register electronically through http://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/efile. If an IRB lacks the ability to register electronically, it must send its registration information, in writing, to the Office of Good Clinical Practice, Office of Special Medical Programs, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, Rm. 5129, Silver Spring, MD 20993.

* * * * *

■ 3. Section 56.107 is amended in paragraph (a), by revising the 3rd sentence to read as follows:

**§ 56.107 IRB membership.**

(a) * * * In addition to possessing the professional competence necessary to review the specific research activities, the IRB shall be able to ascertain the acceptability of proposed research in terms of institutional commitments and regulations, applicable law, and standards of professional conduct and practice. * * *
* * * * *

Dated: March 12, 2013. Leslie Kux, Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013–06030 Filed 3–14–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4160–01–P**

**PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION** 

**29 CFR Parts 4022 and 4044**

**Allocation of Assets in Single Employer Plans; Benefits Payable in**  **Terminated Single-Employer Plans; Interest Assumptions for Valuing and**  **Paying Benefits**

**AGENCY :**  Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

**ACTION :**  Final rule. **SUMMARY :**  This final rule amends the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s regulations on Benefits Payable in Terminated Single-Employer Plans and Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer Plans to prescribe interest assumptions under the benefit payments regulation for valuation dates in April 2013 and interest assumptions under the asset allocation regulation for valuation dates in the second quarter of 2013. The interest assumptions are used for valuing and paying benefits under terminating single-employer plans covered by the pension insurance system administered by PBGC.

**DATES :**  Effective April 1, 2013.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Catherine B. Klion (Klion.Catherine@PBGC.gov ), Assistant General Counsel for Regulatory Affairs, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20005, 202–326–4024. (TTY/TDD users may call the Federal relay service toll free at 1–800–877–8339 and ask to be connected to 202–326–4024.)

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  PBGC’s regulations on Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer Plans (29 CFR part 4044) and Benefits Payable in Terminated Single-Employer Plans (29 CFR part 4022) prescribe actuarial assumptions—including interest assumptions—for valuing and payingplan benefits under terminating singleemployer plans covered by title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The interest assumptions in the regulations are also published on PBGC’s Web site (http:// www.pbgc.gov ). The interest assumptions in Appendix B to Part 4044 are used to value benefits for allocation purposes under ERISA section 4044. PBGC uses the interest assumptions in Appendix B to Part 4022 to determine whether a benefit is payable as a lump sum and to determine the amount to pay. Appendix C to Part 4022 contains interest assumptions for private-sector pension practitioners to refer to if they wish to use lump-sum interest rates determined using PBGC’s historical methodology. Currently, the rates in Appendices B and C of the benefit payment regulation are the same.

The interest assumptions are intended to reflect current conditions in the financial and annuity markets. Assumptions under the asset allocation regulation are updated quarterly; assumptions under the benefit payments regulation are updated monthly. This final rule updates the benefit payments interest assumptions for April 2013 and updates the asset allocation interest