alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 22 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 22

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Citizens' Stamp Advisory 
      Committee should recommend to the Postmaster General that a 
 commemorative postage stamp be issued to promote public awareness of 
                             Down syndrome.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 21, 2007

   Mr. Durbin (for himself and Mr. Cochran) submitted the following 
concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Citizens' Stamp Advisory 
      Committee should recommend to the Postmaster General that a 
 commemorative postage stamp be issued to promote public awareness of 
                             Down syndrome.

Whereas Down syndrome affects people of all races and economic levels;
Whereas Down syndrome is the most frequently occurring chromosomal abnormality;
Whereas 1 in every 800 to 1,000 children is born with Down syndrome;
Whereas more than 350,000 people in the United States have Down syndrome;
Whereas 5,000 children with Down syndrome are born each year;
Whereas as the mortality rate associated with Down syndrome in the United States 
        decreases, the prevalence of individuals with Down syndrome in the 
        United States will increase;
Whereas some experts project that the number of people with Down syndrome will 
        double by 2013;
Whereas individuals with Down syndrome are becoming increasingly integrated into 
        society and community organizations, such as schools, health care 
        systems, work forces, and social and recreational activities;
Whereas more and more people in the United States interact with individuals with 
        Down syndrome, increasing the need for widespread public acceptance and 
        education; and
Whereas a greater understanding of Down syndrome and advancements in treatment 
        of Down syndrome-related health problems have allowed people with Down 
        syndrome to enjoy fuller and more active lives: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) the United States Postal Service should issue a 
        commemorative postage stamp to promote public awareness of Down 
        syndrome; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                 CERTIFICATION
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
       (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                              UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of The First Years Inc., (the "Company"), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 28, 2003

                                       By: /s/ RONALD J. SIDMAN
                                           -------------------------------------
                                             RONALD J. SIDMAN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE
                                             OFFICER, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF
                                                  DIRECTORS, AND PRESIDENT


Date: March 28, 2003

                                       By: /s/ JOHN R. BEALS
                                           -------------------------------------
                                            JOHN R. BEALS, TREASURER AND SENIOR
                                              VICE PRESIDENT -- FINANCE (CHIEF
                                                FINANCIAL OFFICER AND CHIEF
                                                    ACCOUNTING OFFICER)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### 21008.

[3128-01] 

### DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
OFFICE OF CONSERVATION AND SOI.AR APPLICATIONS [10 CFR Part 430]
ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOlt .APPLIANCES Proposed Rulemaklng and Public Hearing Regarding Test Procedures for Water Heaters;**Cancella~ion** of Hearing 

### AGENCY: Departmentof Energy. ACTION: Cancellation ofhearing, SUMMARY: On April 3, 1978 (43 

### FR 13888), 

### the Department of Energy published proposed amendments to Test Procedures for Water Heaters. The public hearing on this proposal, as scheduled in the FEDERAL REGISTER, 

### was to be held on May 16, 1978. 

### However, since norequest to speak for this hearing was received, the hearing is 

### herebycanceled. DATE: May 16, 1978. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 

### CONTACT:

JamesA. 

### Smith, 202-566-4635. 

### Issued in

### Washington, D.C., May 12, 1978. WILLIAM P. DAVIS, DeputyDirector of

Administration. CFRDoc.78-13412Filed 5-15-78; 8:45 amJ

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 43, NO. 95-TUESDAY, MAY Hi, 1978
EX-10.7



 Exhibit 10.7 

            , 2014 

Mr. David Gold 
 1216 Sewells Rd. 

Toronto, Ontario 
 M1X 1S1 

Canada 
 Dear David: 

I am pleased that you have accepted the role as President-Canadian Operations, effective upon the closing of the combination agreements among
the founding companies of Fenix Parts, Inc. (“Fenix”) and the Fenix IPO. In this position, you will have an integral role in the success of Fenix. 

As you know, the principal terms of your employment are covered by your employment agreement, which addresses your salary, bonus opportunity
and eligibility for participation in Fenix’s stock option plan after its adoption by our board of directors. In the case of any inconsistency between this side letter and your employment agreement, the provisions of this side letter shall
prevail. 
 In connection with your participation in Fenix’s bonus program, during the initial term of your employment agreement, Fenix
will guarantee payment to you of a cash bonus of 50% of your base salary. Any references to base salary in your employment agreement will be deemed to include this guaranteed bonus, except when the agreement refers to a percentage of base salary, in
which case the base salary to which the percentage is applied will not be deemed to include the guaranteed bonus. 
 You will continue to
have the opportunity to earn a bonus of up to 100% of your base salary depending on Fenix’s attainment of corporate performance goals and your achievement of mutually agreed-on individual performance goals, but any bonus in excess of 50% of
base salary will not be guaranteed. 
 In addition to the compensation that will be provided to you under your employment agreement and in
consideration of your new role in Fenix, we will provide you with an initial grant of stock options for approximately 80,000 shares, at an exercise price equal to the closing price on the date of grant, or an award of restricted shares having the
same value as the option grant (as determined by the board), or a combination of the two. The mix between options and restricted shares will be determined by our board of directors. The option and restricted stock awards will be subject to the terms
of the stock option plan to be adopted by our board. 
 We look forward to a beneficial and productive relationship. 

 

	
	Sincerely,
	
	
	
	 Kent Robertson
 President and Chief Executive
Officer
#### George Holtzer, Appellant, v London Meat Co., Inc., et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[697 NYS2d 275]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered on or about September 16, 1998, which, *inter alia,*granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly awarded since plaintiffs theory that his injury was caused by bald tires on defendants’ van is unsupported by any probative evidence in admissible form and amounts to sheer conjecture and speculation *(see, Burgos v Aqueduct Realty Corp.,*92 NY2d 544, 550; *see also, Lynn v Lynn,*216 AD2d 194). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Tom, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ram LACHMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 85-1113.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 19, 1987.

Martin Healy, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Chris Cannon, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Before DOROTHY W. NELSON, WILLIAM C. CANBY, JR. and JOHN T. NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The petition for rehearing filed December 8, 1986, is granted. No additional briefing or argument is required. The order filed November 4, 1986, is withdrawn. The order to show cause is discharged.

The suggestion of appropriateness of rehearing en banc filed December 8, 1986, is dismissed as moot.
```

[113th Congress Public Law 130]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 1724]]

Public Law 113-130
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of 
Defense joint outpatient clinic to be constructed in Marina, California, 
      as the ``Major General William H. Gourley VA-DOD Outpatient 
            Clinic''. <<NOTE: July 25, 2014 -  [H.R. 272]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. NAME OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AND 
                              DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE JOINT 
                              OUTPATIENT CLINIC, MARINA, 
                              CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Designation.--The Department of Veterans Affairs and Department 
of Defense joint outpatient clinic to be constructed at the intersection 
of the proposed Ninth Street and the proposed First Avenue in Marina, 
California, shall be known and designated as the ``Major General William 
H. Gourley VA-DOD Outpatient Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document, 
record, or other paper of the United States to the Department of 
Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense joint outpatient clinic 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Major General William H. Gourley VA-DOD Outpatient Clinic''.

    Approved July 25, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 272:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 159 (2013):
                                    Nov. 18, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 160 (2014):
                                    July 9, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION


         I, Robert Ellin, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Amalgamated Technologies,
Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: May 21, 2004


/s/ ROBERT ELLIN
----------------
Robert Ellin
President
§ 22.46 Compromise or settlement. ( a ) Parties may make offers of compromise or settlement at any time.
( b ) The reviewing official has the exclusive authority to compromise or settle a case under this part at any time after the date on which the reviewing official is permitted to issue a complaint and before the date on which the ALJ issues an initial decision.
( c ) The authority head has exclusive authority to compromise or settle a case under this part at any time after the date on which the ALJ issues an initial decision, except during the pendency of any review under § 22.42 or during the pendency of any action to collect penalties and assessments under § 22.43.
( d ) The Attorney General has exclusive authority to compromise or settle a case under this part during the pendency of any review under § 22.42 or of any action to recover penalties and assessments under 31 U.S.C. 3806.
( e ) The investigating official may recommend settlement terms to the reviewing official, the authority head, or the Attorney General, as appropriate. The reviewing official may recommend settlement terms to the authority head, or the Attorney General, as appropriate.
( f ) Any compromise or settlement must be in writing.
# EUR-Lex - 31999R0258 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999R0258

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 258/1999 of 3 February 1999 repealing Regulation (EC) No 913/97 adopting exceptional support measures for the market in pigmeat in Spain **

*
Official Journal L 030 , 04/02/1999 P. 0020 - 0020 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 258/1999 of 3 February 1999 repealing Regulation (EC) No 913/97 adopting exceptional support measures for the market in pigmeat in Spain

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in pigmeat (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 3290/94 (2), and in particular Article 20 thereof,

Whereas, because of the outbreak of classical swine fever in certain production regions in Spain, animal health measures were adopted by the Spanish authorities pursuant to Article 9 of Council Directive 80/217/EEC of 22 January 1980 introducing Community measures for the control of classical swine fever (3), as last amended by Decision 93/384/EEC (4); whereas exceptional support measures for the market in pigmeat were adopted for this Member State by Commission Regulation (EC) No 913/97 (5), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2691/98 (6);

Whereas, in view of the progress achieved on the animal health side, the exceptional market support measures can now be closed down; whereas, therefore, Regulation (EC) No 913/97 needs to be repealed;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Pigmeat,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 913/97 is hereby repealed.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 February 1999.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 282, 1. 11. 1975, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 349, 31. 12. 1994, p. 105.

(3) OJ L 47, 21. 2. 1980, p. 11.

(4) OJ L 166, 8. 7. 1993, p. 34.

(5) OJ L 131, 23. 5. 1997, p. 14.

(6) OJ L 338, 15. 12. 1998, p. 3.
#### § 38.5 General prohibitions on discrimination.

No individual in the United States may, on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or political affiliation or belief, or, for beneficiaries, applicants, and participants only, on the basis of citizenship or participation in any WIOA Title I-financially assisted program or activity, be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, subjected to discrimination under, or denied employment in the administration of or in connection with any WIOA Title I-financially assisted program or activity.
#### NELLIE STUART v WILLIAM STUART

■Ohio Appeals, 2nd Dist, Montgomery Co

No 996.

Decided July 2, 1930

R. R. Cross, Dayton, for Nellie Stuart.

J. J. Hoover, Dayton, for William Stuart.

BY THE COURT

Exception was taken to this order of the Court and request was made to the court to fix an appeal bond. This was fixed in the sum of $200.00 and .the case is now in this Court on appeal from such order for alimony pending the suit. We do not think this is a final order from which an appeal may be taken, nor is an awarding of alimony appealable. Error would have to be prosecuted in order to present such question to this Court if the order could be considered as a final order.
§ 38.79 When a complaint contains insufficient information. ( a ) If a complaint does not contain enough information to identify the respondent or the basis of the alleged discrimination, the timeliness of the complaint, or the apparent merit of the complaint, the Director must try to get the needed information from the complainant.
( b ) The Director may close the complainant's file, without prejudice, if: ( 1 ) The Director makes reasonable efforts to try to find the complainant, but is unable to reach him or her; or
( 2 ) The complainant does not provide the needed information to CRC within the time specified in the request for more information.
( c ) If the Director closes the complainant's file, the Director must send written notice to the complainant's last known address, email address (or another known method of contacting the complainant in writing).
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol Federal Financial (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, John B. Dicus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Neil F. M. McKay, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such Report.







Date:   May 5, 2004                                    By:   /s/ John B. Dicus
                                                                                     John B. Dicus, President and 
                                                                                     Chief Executive Officer



Date:   May 5, 2004                                   By:   /s/ Neil F. M. McKay
                                                                                     Neil F.M. McKay, Executive Vice President
                                                                                     and Chief Financial Officer





This certification is not deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.