alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GARCHEV v LOOMIS COAL & SUPPLY CO

Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Summit Co

No 1675.

Decided June 19, 1930

Benner, Hanter & Watters, Akron, for Garchev.

N. O. Mather, Akron, for Coal Co.

PER CURIAM

A motion has been filed to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the action is not • appealable, but said motion is overruled, for the reason that we find that the primary relief sought is equitable and that the damages sought are incidental thereto.

Plaintiff was the owner of said premises before said tipple was constructed, and the business of the defendant is useful and necessary, and considering the neighborhood and surroundings ,the location of the tipple is not inappropriate, and if operated in the most approved and orderly manner and so as to subject plaintiff to no more than the ordinary annoyances, discomforts and injuries which are fairly incidental to the reasonable and proper conduct of such business, is not a nuisance.

*473But we find that it is not being so operated; that by the expendiutre of a reasonable sum it may be so equipped and operated as to greatly lessen, if not entirely eliminate, damages to plaintiff.

Finding that the operation of said tipple as it is now being operated violates the property rights of the plaintiff and constitutes a nuisance, and. that the plaintiff’s right of action for damages is not an adequate remedy, the defendant will be enjoined from operating said tipple for the handling of coal in the manner in which it is now being done.

The court will not attempt to specify what changes should be made and equipment installed in order to be able to operate said tipple so as not to subject plaintiff to more than the ordinary annoyances, discomforts and injuries which are fairly incidental to the reasonable and proper conduct of s,aid business in that locality, but if the parties will agree in reference to such improvements and changes in operation, the same may be included in the decree of the court, with appropriate provisions safeguarding the rights of both parties.

The evidence as to damage is meager and unsatisfactory, ,and such as to render it difficult for us to justly and fairly determine the same; hence the cause as to that issue is remanded to the Common Pleas Court for further hearing and determination, in accordance with the rights of the parties as herein fixed and determined.

Funk, PJ, Pardee, J, ,and Washburn, J, concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 537]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-127]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Mathematical Sciences; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name and Committee Code: Special Emphasis in Mathematical 
Sciences (1204).
    Date and Time: February 14-16, 2000; 8:30 a.m. until 5 p.m.
    Place: Room 360, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Dimitry Khavinson, Program Director, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 
22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1994.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposal submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals concerning the 
Dynamical Systems/ET Panel Meeting, as part of the selection process 
for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: December 27, 1999.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-127 Filed 1-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33379-33380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12866]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

Actuarial Advisory Committee With Respect to the Railroad 
Retirement Account; Notice of Public Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with Public Law 92-463 that 
the Actuarial Advisory Committee will hold

[[Page 33380]]

a meeting on May 25, 2000, at 10:30 a.m. at the office of the Chief 
Actuary of the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North Rush Street, 
Chicago, Illinois, on the conduct of the 21st Actuarial Valuation of 
the Railroad Retirement System. The agenda for this meeting will 
include a discussion of the results and presentation of the 21st 
Actuarial Valuation. The text and tables which constitute the Valuation 
will have been prepared in draft form for review by the Committee. It 
is expected that this will be the last meeting of the Committee before 
publication of the Valuation.
    The meeting will be open to the public. Persons wishing to submit 
written statements or make oral presentations should address their 
communications or notices to the RRB Actuarial Advisory Committee, c/o 
Chief Actuary, U.S. Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North Rush Street, 
Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092.

    Dated: May 11, 2000.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-12866 Filed 5-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
```
§ 382.73 How do carriers determine if an animal is a service animal that must be accepted for transport? May a carrier require that a service animal be under the control of the service animal user or handler? ( a ) You may rely on one or more of the factors set forth in paragraphs (a)(1) through)(3) of this section to determine if an animal is a service animal that must be accepted for transport. ( 1 ) You may make two inquiries to determine whether an animal qualifies as a service animal. You may ask if the animal is required to accompany the passenger because of a disability and what work or task the animal has been trained to perform. You must not ask about the nature or extent of a person's disability or ask that the service animal demonstrate its work or task.
( 2 ) You may observe the behavior of an animal. A trained service animal will remain under the control of its handler. It does not run freely around an aircraft or an airport gate area, bark or growl repeatedly at other persons or other animals on the aircraft or in the airport gate area, bite, jump on, or cause injury to people, or urinate or defecate in the cabin or gate area. An animal that engages in such disruptive behavior demonstrates that it has not been successfully trained to behave properly in a public setting and carriers are not required to treat it as a service animal without a carrier in the cabin, even if the animal performs an assistive function for a passenger with a disability.
( 3 ) You may look for physical indicators, such as a harness or vest on the animal, to determine if the animal is a service animal.
( b ) You may require that a service animal be harnessed, leashed, or otherwise tethered at all times by the service animal user or service animal handler while in areas of the airport that you own, lease or control, or on an aircraft.
[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2018-0068, 85 FR 79774, Dec. 10, 2020]
#### § 35.20 General responsibilities.

Each DOL recipient has primary responsibility for ensuring that its programs or activities are in compliance with the Act and this part and for taking appropriate steps to correct any violations of the Act or this part.
December 22, 2015 

United States Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Amendment to Exemption No. 11367, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0106 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

We are writing pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and the procedures 

contained in 14 C.F.R. 11, to request that ADM Crop Risk Services, Inc. ("ADMCRS"), an already FAA 

approved owner and operator of small unmanned aircraft to add another aircraft to its crop scouting 

operations. We appreciate the FAA for approving our petition to operate the DJI Phantom 2 and now 

we ask to operate the DJI Phantom 3 to enhance and grow our offerings to our customers. We 

respectfully write that the FAA approve our request. 

Name and Address of Applicant is: 

ADM Crop Risk Services 

Attn: John Fahl, Vice President Claims Department 

350 North Water Street 

Decatur IL 62523 

Main Office 1-888-523-6277 

Fax 1-217-451-7829 

Email: jfahl@admcrs.com 

Our request is similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of 

Exemption No. 11367. The Phantom 2 and 3 are built on the same frame and are almost identical in 

every way. Weight is only increased by 38 grams, but the total is still only weighing in at 1280 grams. 

The Phantom 3 has built in rotor enhancements for greater control of the aircraft and thereby offering 

greater safety. The Phantom 3 has an increased payload due to advanced camera function, but also the 

1 
addition of auto-sensing technology which will make the aircraft even safer. ADMCRS will continue to 

operate Phantom 3 aircraft according to their 333 exemption which include, but are not limited to: 

DJI Phantom 3 weighs less than 55 pounds 

UAS operation not exceeded 87 knots {100 miles per hour) 

UAS operation at altitude under 400 feet above ground level 

UAS operated within visual line of sight {VLOS) 

Operations always utilizing a visual observer {VO) 

Pre-flight and post-flight inspections performed on UAS 

No operation within 5 nautical miles of an airport 

UAS operations will remain clear and give way to all manned aviation activities 

ADMCRS respectfully requests that the FAA grant its request to operate the DJI Phantom 3. 

Thank you for your timely consideration. 

(Attached are technical specifications and user manual) 

Sincerely, 

John Fahl, Vice President of Claims 

ADM Crop Risk Services 

2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12841]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By notice dated February 10, 2000, and published in the Federal 
Register on February 17, 2000, (65 FR 33), Novartis Pharmaceutical 
Corporation, 59 Route 10, East Hanover, New Jersey 07926, made 
application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as a bulk manufacturer of methylphenidate (1724), a basic 
class of controlled substance listed in Schedule II.
    The firm plans to manufacture finished product for distribution to 
its customers.
    DEA has considered the factors in title 21, United States Code, 
section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Novartis 
Pharmaceutical Corporation to manufacture methylphenidate is consistent 
with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Novartis 
Pharmaceutical Corporation on a regular basis to ensure that the 
company's continued registration is consistent with the public 
interest. These investigations have included inspection and testing of 
the company's physical security systems, audits of the company's 
records, verification of the company's compliance with state and local 
laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, 
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy 
Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby orders 
that the application submitted by the above firm for registration as a 
bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed 
above is granted.

    Dated: May 12, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-12841 Filed 5-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
#### INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION v ROGERS

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21965.

Decided March 26, 1930

Kinkade, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ.,. concur. Marshall, CJ., concurs in propositions one and two of the syllabus.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.20

  SECOND AMENDMENT TO NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. LOAN AGREEMENT, SECURITY
             AGREEMENT AND 10% CONVERTIBLE, SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

      THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. LOAN AGREEMENT,
SECURITY AGREEMENT AND 10% CONVERTIBLE, SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE (the "SECOND
AMENDMENT") is made and entered into as of November 14, 2005, by and among
NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "MAKER") and Toucan
Capital Fund II, L.P. (the "HOLDER"). This Second Amendment amends the Note (as
defined below).

                                    RECITALS

A. Section 17.6 of that certain Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. Loan Agreement,
Security Agreement and 10% Convertible, Secured Promissory Note, in the
principal amount of $500,000.00 amended and restated as of July 30, 2004 and
originally issued on June 11, 2004, by and between the Maker and the Holder in
the form attached to this Second Amendment as Exhibit A and as amended by that
First Amendment to Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. Loan Agreement, Security
Agreement and 10% Convertible, Secured Promissory Note in the form attached to
this Second Amendment as Exhibit B (as so amended, the "NOTE"), states that any
provision of such note may be amended or waived in writing by the Holder and the
Maker; and

B. The Maker and the Holder wish to amend the Note as provided below.

                                    AGREEMENT

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Section 1 of the Note is hereby amended to provide that the Maturity Date is
January 17, 2006.

2. All other terms and conditions of the Note shall be unaffected hereby and
remain in full force and effect.

3. This Second Amendment shall be governed by and construed under the laws of
the state of Delaware without giving effect to principles of conflicts of laws
of the State of Delaware or any other state.

                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

                                        1
<PAGE>

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this SECOND AMENDMENT
TO NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. LOAN AGREEMENT, SECURITY AGREEMENT AND 10%
CONVERTIBLE, SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE as of the date first above written.

MAKER:

NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.,
a Delaware corporation

By: /s/ Alton L. Boynton
    --------------------
Name: Alton L. Boynton
Title: President

HOLDER:

Toucan Capital Fund II, L.P.

By: /s/ Linda Powers
    ---------------------------------
      Linda Powers, Managing Director


259031 v2/RE

                                        2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 97 (Thursday, May 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12528]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AZA 18465]


Notice of Proposed Withdrawal Extension and Opportunity for 
Public Meeting; Arizona

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice, has filed an 
application to extend Public Land Order No. 6493 for a 20-year period. 
This order withdrew public land from surface entry and mining for 
sewage treatment, a water well, and a buffer zone for a Federal 
Correctional Institution located on adjacent land.

DATES: Comments and requests for a public meeting must be received by 
August 16, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Comments and meeting requests should be sent to the 
Facilities Manager, Federal Correctional Institution, 37900 North 45th 
Avenue, Phoenix, Az 85027-7003.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D.C. Henderson, Federal Correctional 
Institution, Phoenix, Arizona; 623-465-9757.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 2, 2000, the Bureau of Prisons filed 
an application to extend Public Land Order No. 6493 for a 20-year 
period. Public Land Order No. 6493 withdrew the following described 
land from settlement, sale, location, or entry under the general land 
laws, including the mining laws, subject to valid existing rights:

Gila and Salt River Meridian

T. 6 N., R. 2 E.,
    Sec. 28, N\1/2\SW\1/4\SW\1/4\;
    Sec. 29, E\1/2\SE\1/4\NE\1/4\, E\1/2\NE\1/4\SE\1/4\, and NE\1/
4\SE\1/4\SE\1/4\.

    The area described contains 70 acres in Maricopa County.

    All persons who wish to submit comments, suggestions, or objections 
in connection with the proposed withdrawal extension may present their 
views in writing, by the date specified above, to the Facilities 
Manager, Federal Correctional Institution, Phoenix, Arizona.
    Notice is hereby given that an opportunity for a public meeting is 
afforded in connection with the proposed withdrawal extension. All 
interested persons who desire a public meeting for the purpose of being 
heard on the proposed withdrawal extension must submit a written 
request, by the date specified above, to the Facilities Manager, 
Federal Correctional Institution, Phoenix, Arizona. Upon determination 
by the authorized officer that a public meeting will be held, a notice 
of the time and place will be published in the Federal Register at 
least 30 days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The application will be processed in accordance with the 
regulations set forth in 43 CFR 2300.

    Dated: May 9, 2000.
Kelly Grissom,
Acting Deputy State Director, Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 00-12528 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-05-P
#### EDWARDS v WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Ohio Appeals, 4th Dist, Washington Co

Decided March 12, 1930

Strecker and Williamson, Marietta, for Edwards.

Frederick C. Myers, Prosecuting Attorney, Marietta, for Commissioners.

*416The judgment is affirmed.

Mauck and Blosser, JJ. concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

KALVIN BISHOP,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF

PHILADELPHIA,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No s . 3 and 4 EM 2024

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14 th day of May , 2024, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED, and the “Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary

Relief” is DENIED.
#### WEAVER et v DUNKEL

Ohio Appeals, 2nd Dist, Montgomery Co

No. 903.

Decided July 8, 1929

Mr. L. E. Speer, Dayton, for Weaver et.

Messrs. Kreitzer & Ratchford, Dayton, for Dunkel.

BY THE COURT

Among other things, counsel for plaintiffs in error claim that the Court was without jurisdiction to render judgment against Goldie Weaver. We think it sufficient to state that no judgment was rendered against Goldie Weaver.

There is also a suggestion that this bill should have been presented to or worked out in the Probate Court through the guardian of Eliza House. Upon the death of Eliza House, the duties of the guardian ceased. The guardian properly paid the expenses at the hospital incurred in caring for Eliza House, but as above stated, his duties terminated the moment Eliza House died.

We have read the record in this case and considered the briefs of counsel and upon such consideration, are of opinion that the lower court was justified in rendering the judgment which it did.

Finding no error in the record which we consider prejudicial to plaintiffs in error, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed.

Kunkle, Allread and Hornbeck, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the date and for
the periods expressed in the Report.
 By:
    /s/ John B. Gerlach, Jr.John B. Gerlach, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerAugust 31, 2007By:
    /s/ John L. BoylanJohn L. BoylanChief Financial OfficerAugust 31, 2007  36
### Geology and ground-water resources of the Big Sandy Creek Valley, Lincoln, Cheyenne, and Kiowa Counties, Colorado

By: Donald L. CoffinClarence Albert Horr

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1843

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.