alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Evalon S. Moses, Appellant, *vs.*B. F. Irvine *&*Co., Respondents.

APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP RAMSEY COUNTY.

It appears from the order in this cause, that it was originally a Certiorari from a judgment of a Justice of the Peace.

A motion was made in the District Court, to quash the writ ■of Certiorari, which motion was denied

The order denying the motion was reversed in the Supreme Court, but the order of reversal is the only paper which can be found on file.
#### §§ 2205.112-2205.129 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the date and for
the periods expressed in the Report.
 By:
    /s/ John B. Gerlach, Jr.John B. Gerlach, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerAugust 29, 2011 By:
    /s/ John L. BoylanJohn L. BoylanChief Financial OfficerAugust 29, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 61 Engrossed Amendment House (EAH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 19, 2007.

    Resolved, That the resolution from the Senate (S. Con. Res. 61) entitled 
``Concurrent resolution providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the 
Senate, and a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives'', do pass 
with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

(1)Page 1, line 2, of the Senate engrossed amendment, strike ``adjourns'' and 
insert: recesses or adjourns

(2)Page 1, beginning on line 6, of the Senate engrossed amendment, strike ``or 
until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent 
resolution'' and insert: or until such day and time as may be specified in the 
motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to 
section 3 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first''
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. Con. Res. 61

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
# AGENCY:

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

# ACTION:

 Proposed rule: Extension of comment period. 

# SUMMARY:

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a proposed rulemaking on November 3, 1999 (64 FR 59671), that would clarify its regulations to reflect more clearly its limited antitrust review authority. Because there has been significant interest in the issue and because the comment period included the end-of-year holiday period, the NRC is agreeing to a request from the public to extend the comment period. 

# DATES:

 The new comment period will expire on February 15, 2000. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able to assure consideration only for comments received on or before this date. 

# ADDRESSES:

 Written comments should be sent to: Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. 

You may also provide comments via the NRC's interactive rulemaking web site (http://ruleforum.llnl.gov). This site provides the ability to upload comments as files (any format), if your web browser supports that function. For information about the interactive rulemaking web site, contact Ms. Carol Gallagher, 301-415-5905; e-mail CAG@nrc.gov. 

Comments received on this rulemaking may be examined at the NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street NW. (Lower Level), Washington, DC. 

                        Documents created or received at the NRC after November 1, 1999, are also available electronically at the NRC's Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at                         *http://www.nrc.gov/​NRC/​ADAMS/​index.html*. From this site, the public can gain entry into the NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS), which provides text and image files of NRC's public documents. For more information, contact the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 202-634-3273 or toll-free at 1-800-397-4209, or by email at                         *pdr@nrc.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Jack R. Goldberg, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone 301-415-1681; e-mail JRG1@nrc.gov. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day of January, 2000. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Annette L. Vietti-Cook, 

Secretary of the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 00-1300 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
§ 1202.15 Length of briefs in NMB hearing proceedings. ( a ) In the event briefs are authorized by the Board or the assigned Hearing Officer, principal briefs shall not exceed fifty (50) pages in length and reply briefs, if permitted, shall not exceed twenty-five (25) pages in length unless the participant desiring to submit a brief in excess of such limitation requests a waiver of such limitation from the Board which is received within five (5) days of the date on which the briefs were ordered or, in the case of a reply brief, within five (5) days of receipt of the principal brief, and in such cases the Board may require the filing of a summary of argument, suitably paragraphed which shoud be a succinct, but accurate and clear, condensation of the argument actually made in the brief.
( b ) The page limitations provided by this section (§ 1202.15) are exclusive of those pages containing the table of contents, tables of citations and any copies of administrative or court decisions which have been cited in the brief. All briefs shall be submitted on standard 81 ⁄ 2 × 11 inch paper with double spaced type.
( c ) Briefs not complying with this section (§ 1202.15) will be returned promptly to their initiators.
[44 FR 10601, Feb. 22, 1979]
§ 417.123 Computing systems and software. ( a ) A launch operator must document a system safety process that identifies the hazards and assesses the risks to public health and safety and the safety of property related to computing systems and software.
( b ) A launch operator must identify all safety-critical functions associated with its computing systems and software. Safety-critical computing system and software functions must include the following: ( 1 ) Software used to control or monitor safety-critical systems.
( 2 ) Software that transmits safety-critical data, including time-critical data and data about hazardous conditions.
( 3 ) Software used for fault detection in safety-critical computer hardware or software.
( 4 ) Software that responds to the detection of a safety-critical fault.
( 5 ) Software used in a flight safety system.
( 6 ) Processor-interrupt software associated with previously designated safety-critical computer system functions.
( 7 ) Software that computes safety-critical data.
( 8 ) Software that accesses safety-critical data.
( 9 ) Software used for wind weighting.
( c ) A launch operator must conduct computing system and software hazard analyses for the integrated system.
( d ) A launch operator must develop and implement computing system and software validation and verification plans.
( e ) A launch operator must develop and implement software development plans, including descriptions of the following: ( 1 ) Coding standards used;
( 2 ) Configuration control;
( 3 ) Programmable logic controllers;
( 4 ) Policy on use of any commercial-off-the-shelf software; and
( 5 ) Policy on software reuse.
#### INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION v ROYER

Ohio Supreme Court

No 22022.

Decided April 16, 1930

Kinkade, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.
# Euroopa Liidu C 198/5. a

| | ISSN 1725-5171 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 198 |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 47. köide5. august 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5171

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 198

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

47. köide5. august 2004

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Teave |
| | Komisjon |
| 2004/C 198/1 | Euro vahetuskurss | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

I   Teave

Komisjon

2004/C 198/1

Euro vahetuskurss

1

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

I Teave

Komisjon

| 5.8.2004 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | C 198/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2004

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

C 198/1

---

Euro vahetuskurss (1)

4. august 2004

(2004/C 198/01)

1 euro=

| | Valuuta | Kurss |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | USA dollar | 1,1983 |
| JPY | Jaapani jeen | 133,72 |
| DKK | Taani kroon | 7,4352 |
| GBP | Inglise nael | 0,65960 |
| SEK | Rootsi kroon | 9,1938 |
| CHF | Šveitsi frank | 1,5394 |
| ISK | Islandi kroon | 86,33 |
| NOK | Norra kroon | 8,4145 |
| BGN | Bulgaaria lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Küprose nael | 0,57940 |
| CZK | Tšehhi kroon | 31,769 |
| EEK | Eesti kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Ungari forint | 250,14 |
| LTL | Leedu litt | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Läti latt | 0,6527 |
| MTL | Malta liir | 0,4245 |
| PLN | Poola zlott | 4,4350 |
| ROL | Rumeenia leu | 40 954 |
| SIT | Sloveenia talaar | 240,0100 |
| SKK | Slovakkia kroon | 40,120 |
| TRL | Türgi liir | 1 782 400 |
| AUD | Austraalia dollar | 1,7079 |
| CAD | Kanada dollar | 1,5844 |
| HKD | Hong Kongi dollar | 9,3465 |
| NZD | Uus-Meremaa dollar | 1,8624 |
| SGD | Singapuri dollar | 2,0667 |
| KRW | Korea won | 1 399,08 |
| ZAR | Lõuna- Aafrika rand | 7,5483 |

Valuuta

Kurss

USD

USA dollar

1,1983

JPY

Jaapani jeen

133,72

DKK

Taani kroon

7,4352

GBP

Inglise nael

0,65960

SEK

Rootsi kroon

9,1938

CHF

Šveitsi frank

1,5394

ISK

Islandi kroon

86,33

NOK

Norra kroon

8,4145

BGN

Bulgaaria lev

1,9558

CYP

Küprose nael

0,57940

CZK

Tšehhi kroon

31,769

EEK

Eesti kroon

15,6466

HUF

Ungari forint

250,14

LTL

Leedu litt

3,4528

LVL

Läti latt

0,6527

MTL

Malta liir

0,4245

PLN

Poola zlott

4,4350

ROL

Rumeenia leu

40 954

SIT

Sloveenia talaar

240,0100

SKK

Slovakkia kroon

40,120

TRL

Türgi liir

1 782 400

AUD

Austraalia dollar

1,7079

CAD

Kanada dollar

1,5844

HKD

Hong Kongi dollar

9,3465

NZD

Uus-Meremaa dollar

1,8624

SGD

Singapuri dollar

2,0667

KRW

Korea won

1 399,08

ZAR

Lõuna- Aafrika rand

7,5483

---

(1)

Allikas: EKP avaldatud viitekurss.

---
# EUR-Lex - 31999R0039 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999R0039

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/1999 of 8 January 1999 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2131/93 laying down the procedure and conditions for the sale of cereals held by intervention agencies **

*
Official Journal L 005 , 09/01/1999 P. 0064 - 0064 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 39/1999 of 8 January 1999 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2131/93 laying down the procedure and conditions for the sale of cereals held by intervention agencies

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 923/96 (2), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2131/93 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2193/96 (4), lays down the procedure and conditions for the sale of cereals held by intervention agencies;

Whereas transport costs vary considerably with time and some of those costs cannot be predicted, in particular where river transport is concerned; whereas for budget reasons a maximum amount should be set for such costs; whereas that amount must be set by the intervention agencies and quoted in the call for tenders;

Whereas the Slovenian port of Koper was the traditional port of exit for Austria before its accession to the European Union; whereas it is therefore necessary to include Koper as a place of exit for Community cereals so that transport costs can be reimbursed;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2131/93, paragraph 2a is replaced by the following:

'2a. However, where Member States have no sea ports, provision may be made to derogate from the preceding paragraph and to provide, in the case of export from a sea port, for the financing of the lowest transport costs between the place of storage and the actual place of exit, within the maximum amounts indicated in the call for tenders. For the purposes of this paragraph, the Slovenian port of Koper may be regarded as a place of exit.`

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 January 1999.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 181, 1. 7. 1992, p. 21.

(2) OJ L 126, 24. 5. 1996, p. 37.

(3) OJ L 191, 31. 7. 1993, p. 76.

(4) OJ L 293, 16. 11. 1996, p. 1.
#### St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, as Subrogee of New York City School Construction Authority, Appellant, v L.E.S. Subsurface Plumbing Company, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[699 NYS2d 31]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered June 30, 1998, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion for summary judgment denied except to the extent of finding that in the event of any recovery by plaintiff, defendant Par is entitled to a set-off in the amount of $78,009.91, and the complaint reinstated.

The motion court erred in finding that defendant plumbing subcontractors were protected from subrogation in excess of their insured property interest under the builder’s risk policy and that said policy’s subrogation waiver endorsement was a self-executing waiver. This action, brought by the subrogorbuilder’s risk insurer seeking to hold defendants liable for damages of $1,284,902.12, less a $25,000 deductible, alleged to have been negligently caused by a burst water pipe, is not barred by the anti-subrogation rule. Under the circumstances, where the builder’s risk policy does not name defendants as insureds, but its “Additional Property Extension Endorsement” covers the loss of “all materials, supplies, equipment and machinery intended for use in and to become a permanent part *140of construction work”, the anti-subrogation bar operates only to the extent of defendants’ insurable interest (see, *Tishman Co. v Carney & Del Guidice,*36 AD2d 273, 274, *affd*34 NY2d 941; *S.S.D.W. Co. v Brisk Waterproofing Co.,*76 NY2d 228, 233-234; *Matter of Lurgi Metallurgie v Industrial Risk Insurers,*262 AD2d 75, *lv denied*93 NY2d 818; *Commerce & Indus. Ins. Co. v Admon Realty,*168 AD2d 321, 322-323), which is limited in this instance to the repairs, made by defendant Par at a cost of $78,009.91, necessitated by the burst pipe. The plain language of the subrogation waiver endorsement (see, *S.S.D.W. Co. v Brisk Waterproofing Co., supra)*precludes a reading that it is self-executing, since it clearly contemplates that such waiver is executory and may only occur at the instance of the insured. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Tom, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.
#### In the Matter of John Becraft, Appellant, against Daniel F. Strobel, Respondent.

Argued May 18, 1937;

decided June 1, 1937.

*578
      *Nicholas 0. Powers*for appellant.

*Donald L. _Brush*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 20 (Monday, January 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 5330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2001]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Bridger-Teton National Forest Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bridger-Teton Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Kemmerer, Wyoming. The committee is meeting as authorized under the 
Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-
343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The 
purpose is to listen to proposed project presentations.

DATES: The meeting will be held on February 28, 2011, and will begin at 
5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the South Lincoln Training and 
Event Center, 215 Wyoming Highway 233, Kemmerer, WY. Written comments 
should be sent to Tracy Hollingshead, Bridger-Teton National Forest, 
308 Hwy 189 North, Kemmerer, WY 83101. Comments may also be sent via e-
mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bfcbd7d0d3d3d6d1d8ccd7dadedbffd9cc91d9dadb91cacc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="daaeb2b5b6b6b3b4bda9b2bfbbbe9abca9f4bcbfbef4afa9">[email protected]</span></a>, or via facsimile to 307-828-5135.
    All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are 
placed in the record and are available for public inspection and 
copying. The public may inspect comments received at Bridger-Teton 
National Forest, Hwy 189 North, Kemmerer, WY 83101. Visitors are 
encouraged to call ahead to 307-877-4415 to facilitate entry into the 
building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tracy Hollingshead, DFO, USDA, 
Bridger-Teton National Forest, Hwy 189 North, Kemmerer, WY 83101; (307) 
877-4415; E-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e89c8087848481868f9b808d898ca88e9bc68e8d8cc69d9b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cabea2a5a6a6a3a4adb9a2afabae8aacb9e4acafaee4bfb9">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through 
Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. The 
following business will be conducted: (1) Approve minutes from February 
14, 2011 meeting; (2) Listen to proposed project presentations; (3) 
Vote on proposed projects; and (4) Public Comment. Persons who wish to 
bring related matters to the attention of the Committee may file 
written statements with the Committee staff before or after the 
meeting.

    Dated: January 25, 2011.
Tracy Hollingshead,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-2001 Filed 1-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### SEIBERT, Recr v HERRING

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21536.

Decided June 5, 1929

Syllabus by

ALLEN, J

PLEADINGS — Trial (590 E3h)

(440 D) The admission arising from a demurrer is not to be regarded as evidence or considered as equivalent to evidence. It merely denies the legal sufficiency of the facts alleged, and hence such facts áre admitted solely for the purpose of testing their sufficiency in law.

Marshall, CJ, Kinkade, Matthias and, Day, JJ, concur. Robinson and' Jones, JJ, concur in the syllabus, but dissent from the judgment.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, David F. Hoffmeister, Chief Financial Officer of Invitrogen Corporation (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance
with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|                   |  |                         
|------------------ |  | ------------------------
|Dated: May 9, 2005 |  | /s/ David F. Hoffmeister
|                   |  | David F. Hoffmeister    
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer 



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Invitrogen and will be retained by Invitrogen and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION**


**OF**


**PRINCIPAL
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND**


**PRINCIPAL
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C.1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








I,
      Albert
      H. Pleus, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of a21, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31,
      2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of a21, Inc.





I,
      Thomas
      Costanza, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of a21, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31,
      2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of a21, Inc.





Pursuant
      to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
      certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.








By:
      /s/
      ALBERT H. PLEUS





Albert
      H.
      Pleus


Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)








By:
      /s/
      THOMAS COSTANZA


Thomas
      Costanza


Vice
      President and Chief Financial Office r


(Principal
      Financial Officer)








Dated:
      May 15, 2006
EXHIBIT
      32.2





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I,
      Peter-Mark Vogel, Chief Financial Officer of Manas Petroleum Corporation (the
      "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)           the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September
      30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      November 14, 2007








/s/
      Peter-Mark
      Vogel


Peter-Mark
      Vogel


Chief
      Financial Officer