alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32





**CONTINENTAL
      BEVERAGE AND NUTRITION, INC.**





**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Continental Beverage and Nutrition,
      Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB of the period ended August 31, 2006 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David
      Sackler, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1)
      the
      quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the
      quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:
        November 20, 2006


/s/
                David SacklerChief
                Executive Officer and Financial Officer
#### Alanson Stacey *versus*David Benson.

Oct. *29th*

In this case it was *resolved,*that under *St.*1783, *c.*38, §7, providing, that where any person, by excessive drinking, &,c. shall endanger or expose “ *the town to which he belongs*” to expense for his maintenance, the selectmen thereof shall make complaint to the judge of probate of the county to which the person *belongs,*and authorizing such judge thereupon to appoint a guardian to such spendthrift, the appointment of a guar*497dian upon the complaint of selectmen of the town where the spendthrift was *domiciled,*was valid, although such spendthrift had his *legal settlement*in a town in a different county from that in which such appointment was made.

*Mann*and S. *Williams,*for the plaintiff.

*Warren,*for the defendant.

[In the Revised Statutes, c. 79, § 11, the matter is put beyond doubt, the authority being conferred on the selectmen of the town of which the spendthrift is an inhabitant, or in which he resides.]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****NASA�s first A: aeronauticsfrom 1958 to 2008**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.21:2012-4412
Item Number:0830-I (online)
CGP systemNumber:000929557
 
April 2, 2018
# L_2009176EN.01002701.xml

| 7.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 176/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 176/27

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 3290/94 of 22 December 1994 on the adjustments and transitional arrangements required in the agriculture sector in order to implement the agreements concluded during the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities L 349 of 31 December 1994
  )

On page 171, Annex XII, Part B, point 3, Article 3(1), third line:

for:

‘at the rate of duty laid down in Article 10’,

read:

‘at the rate of duty laid down in the Common Customs Tariff’;

on page 172, Annex XII, Part B, point 4, Article 4(3):

for:

‘3.   Compliance with the limits on volumes arising from agreements concluded in accordance with Article 288 of the Treaty shall be ensured on the basis of the export certificates issued for the reference periods provided for therein and applicable to the products concerned. With regard to compliance with the obligations arising under the Agreement on Agriculture, the ending of a reference period shall not affect the validity of export licences.’,

read:

‘3.   Where necessary, the method of administration shall take account of the supply needs of the Community market and of the need to preserve its equilibrium and may be based on methods used in the past for quotas similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, without prejudice to rights arising under the agreements concluded during the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations.’.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RIVER MASCARI,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00281-CR

Appeal from

210th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 20120D06125)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We 

further order that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2017.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
#### Jaleesa Ballard et al., Respondents, v Daniel Mouzon, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 910]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from so much of *491an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lisa, J.), dated August 12, 1998, as denied, in part, his application for certain discovery, granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ cross motion which was to dismiss the first and fifth affirmative defenses and the counterclaim, and denied his cross motion to amend his counterclaim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The court properly granted that branch of the plaintiffs cross motion which was to dismiss the first and fifth affirmative defenses and the counterclaim because mere negligent supervision of a child is not actionable *(see, Holodook v Spencer,*36 NY2d 35; *Navaro v Ieraci,*214 AD2d 713).

The proposed amended counterclaim, in light of the new allegation therein, was properly considered a cross motion for leave to replead pursuant to CPLR 3211 (e), (a) (6). Because the defendant failed to demonstrate a sufficient ground to support the proposed amended counterclaim, the cross motion to amend the counterclaim was properly denied *(see,*CPLR 3211 [e]; *Grinstein v Official Laura Branigan Fan Club,*174 AD2d 545).

The defendant’s remaining contention is not properly before this Court. Ritter, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 99 (Monday, May 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32084-32085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12719]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-278-00]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Tariff Filing

May 16, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 10, 2000, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of 
America (Natural) tendered for filing to be a part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on 
Appendix A to the filing, to be effective June 1, 2000.
    Natural states that these tariff sheets are being filed in 
compliance with the Commission's Order No. 587-G issued April 16, 1998 
in Docket No. RM96-1-008, which order relates to interstate pipelines' 
business transactions using Internet communication as well as to 
various issue relating to the standardization of these business 
communications using the Internet.
    Natural requested any waivers which may be required for the 
tendered tariff sheets to become effective June 1, 2000, consistent 
with Order Nos. 587-G and 587-I.
    Natural states that copies of the filing have been mailed to its 
customers, interested state commissions and all parties set out on the 
Commission's official service list in Docket No. RM96-1.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm 

[[Page 32085]]

(call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-12719 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 57 FR 31451, July 16, 1992.

§ 20.202 Scope. ( a ) This subpart applies to any non-tax debt owed to the U.S. Department of Labor or in connection with any program administered by the Department and to any entity that pursues recovery of such debt. The Department can enter into arrangements with other federal agencies to carry out its responsibilities under this part.
( b ) This subpart shall apply notwithstanding any provision of State law.
( c ) Nothing in this subpart precludes the compromise of a debt or the suspension or termination of a collection action in accordance with applicable law. See, for example, the Federal Claims Collection Standards (FCCS), 31 CFR parts 900-904.
( d ) The receipt of payments pursuant to this subpart does not preclude the Department from pursuing other debt collection remedies separately or in conjunction with administrative wage garnishment, including the offset of Federal payments, to satisfy delinquent nontax debt owed to the Department.
( e ) This subpart does not apply to the collection of delinquent nontax debt owed to the United States from the wages of Federal employees from their Federal employment. Federal pay is subject to the Federal salary offset procedures set forth in 5 U.S.C. 5514 and other applicable laws.
( f ) Nothing in this subpart requires the Department to duplicate notices or administrative proceedings required by contract, this subpart, or other laws, regulations, or procedures.
§ 2590.725-2 Reporting requirements related to prescription drug and health care spending. ( a ) *General requirement.* A group health plan or a health insurance issuer offering group health insurance coverage must submit an annual report to the Secretary, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, on prescription drug and health care spending, premiums, and enrollment under the plan or coverage.
( b ) *Timing and form of report.* The report for the 2020 reference year must be submitted to the Secretary by December 27, 2021. Beginning with the 2021 reference year, the report for each reference year is due by June 1 of the year following the reference year. The report must be submitted in the form and manner prescribed by the Secretary, jointly with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
( c ) *Transfer of business.* Issuers that acquire a line or block of business from another issuer during a reference year are responsible for submitting the information and report required by this section for the acquired business for that reference year, including for the part of the reference year that was prior to the acquisition.
( d ) *Reporting entities and special rules to prevent unnecessary duplication* — ( 1 ) *Special rule for insured group health plans.* To the extent coverage under a group health plan consists of group health insurance coverage, the plan may satisfy the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section if the plan requires the health insurance issuer offering the coverage to report the information required by this section in compliance with this subpart pursuant to a written agreement. Accordingly, if a health insurance issuer and a group health plan sponsor enter into a written agreement under which the issuer agrees to provide the information required under paragraph (a) of this section in compliance with this section, and the issuer fails to do so, then the issuer, but not the plan, violates the reporting requirements of paragraph (a) of this section with respect to the relevant information.
( 2 ) *Other contractual arrangements.* A group health plan or health insurance issuer offering group health insurance coverage may satisfy the requirements under paragraph (a) of this section by entering into a written agreement under which one or more other parties (such as health insurance issuers, pharmacy benefit managers, third-party administrators, or other third parties) report some or all of the information required under paragraph (a) of this section in compliance with this section. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, if a group health plan or health insurance issuer chooses to enter into such an agreement and the party with which it contracts fails to provide the information in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, the plan or issuer violates the reporting requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.
( e ) *Applicability date.* The provisions of this section are applicable beginning December 27, 2021.
[86 FR 66699, Nov. 23, 2021]
§ 2570.121 Procedures for review by the Secretary. ( a ) Upon receipt of the notice of appeal, the Secretary shall establish a briefing schedule which shall be served on all parties of record. Upon motion of one or more of the parties, the Secretary may, in his or her discretion, permit the submission of reply briefs.
( b ) The Secretary shall issue a decision as promptly as possible after receipt of the briefs of the parties. The Secretary may affirm, modify, or set aside, in whole or in part, the decision on appeal and shall issue a statement of reasons and bases for the action(s) taken. Such decision by the Secretary shall be final agency action within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 704.
<PAGE>


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(Nos. 333-67917 and 333-67909) on Form S-8 pertaining to the UWSI/BCBSUW 401 
(k) Plan and the United Wisconsin Services, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan, 
respectively, of our report dated February 12, 1999 with respect to the 
consolidated financial statements of United Wisconsin Services, Inc. included 
in the Company's Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 
1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Milwaukee, Wisconsin                             ERNST & YOUNG, LLP
March 25, 1999
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of The Liberty Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), we certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Hayne Hipp
    
    /s/ Howard L. SchrottHayne Hipp
    
    Howard L. SchrottChief Executive Officer
    
    Chief Financial OfficerMarch 2, 2005
    
    March 2, 2005
 57
§ 37.34 What type of notice must a recipient include in publications, broadcasts, and other communications? ( a ) Recipients must indicate that the WIA Title I-financially assisted program or activity in question is an “equal opportunity employer/program,” and that “auxiliary aids and services are available upon request to individuals with disabilities,” in recruitment brochures and other materials that are ordinarily distributed or communicated in written and/or oral form, electronically and/or on paper, to staff, clients, or the public at large, to describe programs financially assisted under Title I of WIA or the requirements for participation by recipients and participants. Where such materials indicate that the recipient may be reached by telephone, the materials must state the telephone number of the TDD/TTY or relay service used by the recipient, as required by § 37.9(c).
( b ) Recipients that publish or broadcast program information in the news media must ensure that such publications and broadcasts state that the WIA Title I-financially assisted program or activity in question is an equal opportunity employer/program (or otherwise indicate that discrimination in the WIA Title I-financially assisted program or activity is prohibited by Federal law), and indicate that auxiliary aids and services are available upon request to individuals with disabilities.
( c ) A recipient must not communicate any information that suggests, by text or illustration, that the recipient treats beneficiaries, registrants, applicants, participants, employees or applicants for employment differently on any prohibited ground specified in § 37.5, except as such treatment is otherwise permitted under Federal law or this part.
#### Thomas J. BAYNHAM, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRANIFF AIRWAYS, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 74-3572.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 2, 1975.

Rehearing Denied July 8, 1975.

Stuart R. Wolk, Albert M. Gross, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Wade C. Smith, Jim E. Cowles, Dallas, Tex., for defendants-appellees.

Frank D. McCown, U. S. Atty., Ft. Worth, Tex., amicus curiae.

Before CLARK, Associate Justice,* and GOLDBERG and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.

*

 Of the Supreme Court of the United States, (Retired) sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See United States v. Palaz-zo, 5 Cir. 1974, 488 F.2d 942; United States v. Skipwith, 5 Cir. 1973, 482 F.2d 1272; United States v. Miller, 5 Cir. 1973, 480 F.2d 1008; United States v. Moreno, 5 Cir. 1973, 475 F.2d 44.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 21

Principal Subsidiaries of the Company (Jurisdiction of Incorporation)


  Lawter International FSC, Limited (Jamaica)
    Kingston, Jamaica

  Lawter International (Belgium) N.V. (Belgium)
    Lokeren, Belgium
    Kallo, Belgium

  Lawter International (Canada) Inc. (Canada)
    Rexdale, Ontario, Canada

  Lawter International, Ltd. (Tianjin) P.R.C. (Peoples Republic of China)
    Tanggu, Peoples Republic of China

  Lawter International, A.p.S. (Denmark)
    Koge, Denmark

  Lawter International, Sarl (France)
    Charenton-le-Pont, France

  Lawter International, GmbH (Germany)
    Frechen, Germany

  Lawter International, Limited (Great Britain)
    Bicester, Oxon, England

  Lawter International (Italia), Srl (Italy)
    Cremona, Italy

  Lawter International, B.V. (Netherlands)
    Waterford, Ireland

  Lawter Antilles, N.V. (Netherlands Antilles)
    Curacao, Netherlands Antilles

  Lawter International Products
    Pte. Ltd. (Singapore)
    Jurong Town, Singapore 

  Lawter International (Proprietary) Limited (South Africa)
    Ndabeni, South Africa

  Lawter International, S.A. (Spain)
    Barcelona, Spain
Exhibit 23





                            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Lilly Industries,  Inc. of our report dated January 12, 1996, included in the
1995 Annual Report to Shareholders of Lilly Industries, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial  statement  schedule of Lilly Industries,
Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the  responsibility of the Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,  presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We further consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 2-59159, 2-76317,  33-52959,  33-52956 and 33-52958 pertaining to
the Lilly  Employees'  Stock  Purchase Plan,  the Lilly  Industries,  Inc. Stock
Option Plan,  the Lilly  Industries,  Inc. 1991 Director  Stock Option Plan, the
Lilly  Industries,  Inc.  Employee 401(k) Savings Plan and the Lilly Industries,
Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan, respectively) of our report dated January 12, 1996,
with respect to the consolidated  financial  statements  incorporated  herein by
reference,  and our report  included in the preceding  paragraph with respect to
the financial  statement  schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
Lilly Industries, Inc.


February 23, 1996
                                               /s/  Ernst & Young LLP
§ 38.28 Designation of Equal Opportunity Officers. ( a ) *Governors.* Every Governor must designate an individual as a State-level Equal Opportunity Officer (State-level EO Officer), who reports directly to the Governor and is responsible for State Program-wide coordination of compliance with the equal opportunity and nondiscrimination requirements in WIOA and this part, including but not limited to §§ 38.51, 38.53, 38.54, and 38.55 for State Programs. The State-level EO Officer must have staff and resources sufficient to carry out these requirements.
( b ) *All recipients.* Every recipient except small recipients and service providers, as defined in § 38.4(hhh) and (ggg), must designate a recipient-level Equal Opportunity Officer (recipient-level EO Officer), who reports directly to the individual in the highest-level position of authority for the entity that is the recipient, such as the Governor, the Administrator of the State Department of Employment Services, the Chair of the Local Workforce Development Board, the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, or an equivalent official. The recipient-level EO Officer must have staff and resources sufficient to carry out the requirements of this section and § 38.31. The responsibilities of small recipients and service providers are described in §§ 38.32 and 38.33.