alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6169

CRAIG SANDERS BOONE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FRANKLIN FREEMAN, Secretary DOC; HARRY L.

ALLSBROOK; Q. REHNER; CAPTAIN HARDY; ACREE,

C/O; PATTON, C/O; LIEUTENANT BOBBIT; SERGEANT

GREGORY; K. MOORE, Sergeant; J. PORTER, C/O;

ARRINGTON, C/O; HILL, C/O; JONES, C/O; LPN

SCHULTZ, C/O; LPN LYNCH, C/O; DOCTOR BROWN;

M. ALESHIRE, C/O; COLLIE, C/O; JUSTICE, C/O;

PILGREEN, C/O,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CA-94-840-CRT-BO)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 1, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Craig Sanders Boone, Appellant Pro Se. Mark John Pletzke, NORTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Boone v. Freeman, No. CA-94-840-CRT-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 14,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 483 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 26
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 483

                 To enact into law a bill by reference.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2019

 Mr. Roberts (for himself, Ms. Stabenow, and Mr. Udall) introduced the 
             following bill; which was read the first time

                           February 14, 2019

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 To enact into law a bill by reference.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    Sec. __. (a) H.R. 1029 of the 115th Congress, as passed by the 
Senate on June 28, 2018, is enacted into law.
    (b) In publishing this Act in slip form and in the United States 
Statutes at Large pursuant to section 112 of title 1, United States 
Code, the Archivist of the United States shall include after the date 
of approval at the end an appendix setting forth the text of the bill 
referred to in subsection (a).
                                                        Calendar No. 26

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 483

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

                 To enact into law a bill by reference.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 14, 2019

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 899 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 899

    To amend section 401(b)(2) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
            regarding the Federal Pell Grant maximum amount.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 2007

  Mr. Dodd (for himself, Ms. Mikulski, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Sanders, Mr. 
    Durbin, Mr. Lieberman, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Akaka, and Mr. Levin) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend section 401(b)(2) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
            regarding the Federal Pell Grant maximum amount.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL PELL GRANT MAXIMUM AMOUNT.

    Section 401(b)(2) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1070a(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C);
            (2) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the amount of 
        the Federal Pell Grant for a student eligible under this part 
        shall be--
                    ``(i) $7,600 for academic year 2007-2008;
                    ``(ii) $8,600 for academic year 2008-2009;
                    ``(iii) $9,600 for academic year 2009-2010;
                    ``(iv) $10,600 for academic year 2010-2011; and
                    ``(v) $11,600 for academic year 2011-2012,
                        less an amount equal to the amount determined 
                        to be the expected family contribution with 
                        respect to that student for that year.''; and
            (3) by inserting after subparagraph (A) (as amended by 
        paragraph (2)) the following:
            ``(B) If the Secretary determines that the increase from 
        one academic year to the next in the amount of the maximum 
        Federal Pell Grant authorized under subparagraph (A) does not 
        increase students' purchasing power (relative to the cost of 
        attendance at an institution of higher education) by not less 
        than 5 percentage points, then the amount of the maximum 
        Federal Pell Grant authorized under subparagraph (A) for the 
        academic year for which the determination is made shall be 
        increased by an amount sufficient to achieve such a 5 
        percentage point increase.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of LaBarge, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 27, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald H. Nonnenkamp, Vice President, CFO and Secretary of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. |  | Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |  |                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                          |                         |                                                       
|------------------------- | ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|                          |                         |                                                       
|Dated:  SEPTEMBER 2, 2004 | /S/DONALD H. NONNENKAMP
|                          |                         | Donald H. Nonnenkamp
Vice President, CFO and Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 98 (Friday, May 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31949-31950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12687]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Meetings

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following meetings during the week of 
May 22, 2000.
    An open meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 9:00 a.m. 
in Room 1C30.
    The subject matter of the open meeting scheduled for Tuesday, May 
23, 2000 at 9 a.m. will be:

The Commission's Division of Investment Management will conduct a 
roundtable discussing several issues relating to investment 
advisers. The roundtable will bring together investment advisers, 
legal counsel to advisers, representatives from state regulatory 
bodies, representatives from the NASD, and others to discuss these 
issues and offer their recommendations. For further information, 
please contact Cynthia M. Fornelli at (202) 942-0720, or J. David 
Fielder at (202) 942-0530.

    A closed meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 24, 2000 at 11:00 
a.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (8), (9)(A) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(4), 
(8), (9)(A) and (10), permit consideration for the scheduled matters at 
the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled Wednesday, May 
24, 2000 will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; and Institution 
and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further

[[Page 31950]]

information and to ascertain that, if any, matters have been added, 
deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: May 16, 2000.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-12687 Filed 5-16-00; 4:07 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 1926

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.26 Illumination.

Construction areas, aisles, stairs, ramps, runways, corridors, offices, shops, and storage areas where work is in progress shall be lighted with either natural or artificial illumination. The minimum illumination requirements for work areas are contained in subpart D of this part.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 2(6)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
----------------------------------------------X
In re:
                                                     Chapter 7
KENIL WORTH SYSTEMS CORPORATION,
                                                     Case No.: 882-82273-346
                         Debtor.
----------------------------------------------X      ORDER

            UPON the Notice of Presentment, dated March 19, 1998, by Andrew M.
Thaler, Chapter 7 Trustee of the bankruptcy estate of Kenilworth Systems
Corporation (the "Debtor") in the above-captioned Chapter 7 case, by his
attorneys Pryor & Mandelup, L.L.P., of this Order, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.
ss.554(a) and Rule 6007(a) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,
authorizing the Trustee to abandon the books and records of the Debtor to the
Debtor, by its President, Herbert Lindo, or in the alternative to abandon same
as refuse, on the grounds that the Trustee has no further use of said books and
records in the administration of the Debtor's estate and said books and records
are of inconsequential value to the estate and the further maintenance of said
books and records, including the cost of storage thereof, is burdensome to the
Debtor's estate; and

            UPON the affidavit of service of the Notice of Presentment and Order
on all creditors of the Debtor holding allowed claims and on CashTek
Corporation, and said service being deemed sufficient; and no objections or
request for a hearing on the proposed Order having been timely flied; and for
good cause shown; it is hereby
<PAGE>   2

            ORDERED, that pursuant to 11 U.S.C. ss.554(a), the Trustee hereby is
authorized to abandon to the Debtor, by its President, Herbert Lindo, or in the
alternative, to abandon as refuse, all books and records of the Debtor.

Dated: Westbury, New York
       April 21, 1998


                                          /s/ FRANCIS G. CONRAD
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          HONORABLE FRANCIS G. CONRAD
                                          UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

10 a.m., Monday, May 15, 2000.

# PLACE:

Room 6005, 6th Floor, 1730 K Street NW, Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

Closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552b(c)(10)).

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

It was determined by unanimous vote of a quorum of the Commission that the Commission consider and act upon the following in closed session:

                        1.                         *Eagle Energy, Inc.*                         v.                         *Secretary of Labor (MSHA) and FMSHRC,*                         4th Cir. No. 00-1073, FMSHRC Docket No. WEVA 98-39.                    

No earlier announcement of the meeting was possible.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO:

Jean Ellen: (202) 653-5629, (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay, 1-800-877-8339 for toll-free.

Jean H. Ellen,

Chief Docket Clerk.

[FR Doc. 00-12757 Filed 5-17-00; 1:30 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
# EUR-Lex - 32000D0751 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000D0751

**2000/751/EC: Council Decision of 30 November 2000 on declassifying certain parts of the Common Manual adopted by the Executive Committee established by the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 **

*
Official Journal L 303 , 02/12/2000 P. 0029 - 0029 *

Council Decision

of 30 November 2000

on declassifying certain parts of the Common Manual adopted by the Executive Committee established by the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985

(2000/751/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 207 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) By its Decisions of 14 December 1993 (SCH/Com-ex (93) 22 rev) and 23 June 1998 (SCH/Com-ex (98) 17), the Executive Committee established by the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985, which was replaced by the Council pursuant to Article 2 of the Schengen Protocol, classified as "Confidential" all the provisions of the Common Manual, the last version of which was adopted by the Decision of the said Executive Committee on 28 April 1999 (SCH/Com-ex (99) 13).

(2) The Common Manual and the Decisions of the Executive Committee on its classification form part of the Schengen acquis as defined by the Council in its Decision 1999/435/EC(1).

(3) Certain parts of the Common Manual should be declassified, including the provisions corresponding to the non-classified provisions of the Common Consular Instructions,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Part I and Annexes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5a, 6, 6a, 7, 8, 8a, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 14a of the Common Manual shall be declassified.

Article 2

The declassified parts of the Common Manual shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Article 3

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its publication.

Done at Brussels, 30 November 2000.

For the Council

The President

M. Lebranchu

(1) OJ L 176, 10.7.1999, p. 1.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 57637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23006]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8029]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Place of Provenance--Regional Styles in Tibetan 
Painting''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``The Place of Provenance--Regional Styles 
in Tibetan Painting,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the Rubin Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on 
or about October 12, 2012, until on or about March 25, 2013, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 11, 2012.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-23006 Filed 9-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
#### PIERCE v CLEVELAND (city)

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 10562.

Decided Feb. 3, 1930

G. Stevens, Cleveland, for Pierce.

Ben Levin, Cleveland, for City.

LEVINE, J.

While it is true that the other police officer was interrogated by way of cross-examination concerning the same subject matter, yet in the charge of the court to the jury the court expressly told the jury in substance to disregard any testimony showing that there was a fight and assault. In our opinion this w,as material in view of the denial of the accused that he was intoxicated.

The judgment of the Municipal- Court is ordered reversed and a new trial ordered according to law.

Vickery, PJ., and Sullivan, J., concur.
#### Grant E. NAEGLE and Norma C. Naegle, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

Nos. 20877, 20877A.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

May 16, 1967.

Grant E. Naegle and Norma C. Naegle, in pro. per.

Mitchell Rogovin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Gilbert E. Andrews, Deene R. Goodlaw, Attys., Tax Div., Dept, of Justice, Lester Uretz, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.

*398PER CURIAM.

The petitions for review in this case involve deficiencies in income tax in the total amount of $16,718.57 against Grant E. Naegle for the years 1956 and 1960, and in the total amount of $249.11 against his wife, Norma, for the years 1959 and 1960. Decisions of the Tax Court upholding the deficiencies were entered November 10, 1965. The questions presented for our determination, both factual in nature, are (1) whether the Tax Court correctly held that sums embezzled in 1956 were includible in taxpayer’s income in that year; (2) whether the Tax Court correctly held that taxpayer had failed to prove net operating losses in prior years, deductions for charitable contributions and repayment of embezzled funds, and that Norma Naegle was entitled to claim for herself both deductions for the two minor children of the parties.

For the reasons set forth by the Tax Court in its Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion, filed August 6, 1965, the decisions are affirmed.
[Nos. 20309-3-III; 20310-7-III.

Division Three.

December 5, 2002.]

#### *In the Matter of the Welfare of*E.N., et al. Marcy N., *Appellant,*v. The Department of Social and Health Services, *Respondent.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Benton County, Nos. 00-7-00372-8 and 00-7-00373-6, Craig J. Matheson, J., entered June 1, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, J., concurred in by Brown, C.J., and Schultheis, J.