alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Part 1 
          - [REG-105089-99] 
          - RIN 1545-AX38 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed rulemaking. 

# SUMMARY:

This document provides notice of cancellation of a public hearing on proposed regulations relating to the treatment of nonqualified preferred stock and other preferred stock in certain exchanges and distributions under section 356 of the Internal Revenue Code. 

# DATES:

The public hearing originally scheduled for Wednesday, May 31, 2000, at 10 a.m., is cancelled. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

LaNita Van Dyke of the Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate), at (202) 622-7180 (not a toll-free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 26, 2000, (65 FR 4203), announced that a public hearing was scheduled for May 31, 2000, at 10 a.m., in room 2615, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the public hearing is proposed regulations under section 354, 355, 356, and 1036 of the Internal Revenue Code. The deadline for requests to speak and outlines of oral comments expired on May 10, 2000.                 

The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing, instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit a request to speak and an outline of the topics to be addressed. As of May 15, 2000, no one has requested to speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for May 31, 2000, is cancelled. 

Cynthia E. Grigsby, 

Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate). 

[FR Doc. 00-12682 Filed 5-18-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________________

No. 96-50878

_______________________________

POINETTE GODFREY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(SA-95-CA-0456)

_________________________________________________________________

April 16, 1997 Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM * :

Poinette Godfrey challenges an adverse summary judgment in her

Title VII action, which arises out of discharge from her employment

as a probationary flight attendant after Southwest ha d received

negative reports concerning her “attitude, friendliness, and

passenger contact”.

Godfrey contends that Southwest’s system of confidential

evaluation of probationary flight attendants constitutes disparateimpact discrimination based on race. Godfrey did not raise this

issue in her complaint, however. The first appearance of this

theory was not until after South west’s summary judgment motion.

Furthermore, in her “letter brief” in response to Southwest’s reply

b rief for summary judgment, Godfrey expressly abandoned her

disparate impact claim. Needless to say, this court may decline to

exercise our discretion to consider issues that were not raised in

the district court. See, e.g., Highlands Ins. Co. v. Nat’l Union

Fire Ins. Co.

, 27 F.3d 1027, 1031-32 (5th Cir. 1994) cert. denied,

115 S. Ct. 903 (1995) (applying, in civil case, plain error

analysis of United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725 (1993)).

In any event, concerning this claim, as well as those for

discriminatory treatment and retaliatory discharge claims, and

pursuant to our de novo review, we affirm for essentially the

reasons stated by the district court. G odfrey v. Southwest

Airlines Co.

, Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment (SA-95-CA-0456) (18 October, 1996).

AFFIRMED
# EUR-Lex - 31999Y0923(02) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999Y0923(02)

**Initiative of the Republic of Finland with a view to adopting a Council Decision amending the Council Act of 3 December 1998 laying down the staff regulations applicable to Europol employees, with regard to the establishment of remuneration, pensions and other financial entitlements in euro **

*
Official Journal C 269 , 23/09/1999 P. 0003 - 0003 *

Initiative of the Republic of Finland with a view to adopting a Council Decision amending the Council Act of 3 December 1998 laying down the staff regulations applicable to Europol employees, with regard to the establishment of remuneration, pensions and other financial entitlements in euro

(1999/C 269/02)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Convention on the establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention)(1), and in particular Article 30(3) thereof,

Having regard to the initiative of the Republic of Finland,

Having regard to the opinion of the Management Board of Europol,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(2),

Whereas:

(1) on 31 December 1998 the Council adopted Regulation (EC) no 2866/98 on the convention rates between the euro and the currencies of the Member States adopting the euro(3);

(2) it is desirable that all amounts mentioned in the Council Act of 3 December 1998 laying down the staff regulations applicable to Europol employees(4) be expressed in euro,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

1. In the Council Act of 3 December 1998, the terms "Dutch guilders" and "NLG" shall be replaced by the term "euro" and "EUR" respectively and amounts expressed in Dutch guilders and NLG shall be replaced by their equivalent in euro units at the conversion rate laid down by the Council.

2. Subsequent to Council Decision of ... adjusting the remuneration and allowances applicable to Europol employees(5), the Director of Europol shall effect the conversion into euro of the different financial entitlements referred to in the staff regulations on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 2866/98.

3. The values established in accordance with paragraph 2 shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its adoption by the Council.

Done at Brussels, ...

For the Council

The President

...

(1) OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 2.

(2) Opinion delivered on ... (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(3) OJ L 359, 31.12.1998, p. 1.

(4) OJ C 26, 30.1.1999, p. 23.

(5) See page 1 of this Official Journal.
[No. 20518-5-III.

Division Three.

November 12, 2002.]

#### Charles Lloyd, *Appellant,*v. Spokane Regional Health District, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 00-2-01664-1, Paul A. Bastine, J., entered August 23, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, J., concurred in by Brown, C.J., and Kato, J.
# C_2004190EN.01000301.xml

| 24.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/3

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 10 June 2004

in Case C-333/03: Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Failure to transpose Directive 98/50/EC - Transfer of undertakings - Safeguarding of employees' rights)

(2004/C 190/05)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-333/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: M.-J. Jonczy ) v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Agent: S. Schreiner) - application for a declaration that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 98/50/EC of 29 June 1998 amending Directive 77/187/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of businesses (OJ 1998 L 201, p. 88) or, in any event, by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive - the Court (Third Chamber), composed of: A. Rosas, acting for the President of the Third Chamber, R. Schintgen and N. Colneric (Rapporteur), Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 10 June 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 98/50/EC of 29 June 1998 amending Directive 77/187/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of businesses, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 98/50/EC of 29 June 1998 amending Directive 77/187/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of businesses, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 213 of 6.9.2003.

1

---
| Related Party                                   |   | Nature of Relationship                      |   | Principal Note |      |   | Warrants |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|----------------|-----------|--------|----------|--------|
| Linwood      J. Bundy                           |   | Director                                    |   | $              | 1,000,000 |   |     |   | 150,000 |   |
| C      & M Management & Realty Partners |   | Director      Joseph J. Morrow              |   |           | 200,000   |   |     |   | 30,000 |   |
|                                            |   |   has      a controlling interest |   |           |      |   |     |   |   |   |
| Janice      K Henry and John M Henry            |   | Director      and spouse                    |   |           | 250,000   |   |     |   | 37,500 |   |
| Patrick      J. Lynch                           |   | Director                                    |   |           | 200,000   |   |     |   | 30,000 |   |
| MCO      Limited Partnership                    |   | Director      Joseph J. Morrow has          |   |           | 300,000   |   |     |   | 45,000 |   |
|                                            |   |   has      a controlling interest |   |           |      |   |     |   |   |   |
| Claire      Morrow                              |   | Spouse      of Director                     |   |           | 250,000   |   |     |   | 37,500 |   |
| The      Joseph J. & Claire Morrow          |   | Spouse      of Director is a                |   |           | 1,000,000 |   |     |   | 150,000 |   |
|   Charitable      Foundation          |   |   Trustee                         |   |           |      |   |     |   |   |   |
| Joseph      J. Morrow Revocable Living Trust    |   | Director                                    |   |           | 1,000,000 |   |     |   | 150,000 |   |
| Morrow      & Co.,      LLC                 |   | Director      Joseph J. Morrow              |   |           | 1,000,000 |   |     |   | 150,000 |   |
|                                            |   |   has      a controlling interest |   |           |      |   |     |   |   |   |
| Nancy      Sununu                               |   | Spouse      of Director                     |   |           | 250,000   |   |     |   | 37,500 |   |
|                                            |   |                                        |   |           |      |   |     |   |   |   |
| Total                                           |   |                                        |   | $              | 5,450,000 |   |     |   | 817,500 |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 27 Engrossed Amendment House (EAH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 30, 2007.
      Resolved, That the resolution from the Senate (S. Con. Res. 27) 
entitled ``Concurrent resolution supporting the goals and ideals of 
`National Purple Heart Recognition Day''', do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            Strike the preamble and insert the following new preamble:

    Whereas the Purple Heart is the oldest military decoration in 
            present use;
    Whereas the Purple Heart is awarded in the name of the President of 
            the United States to members of the Armed Forces who are 
            wounded in action against an enemy of the United States or 
            are wounded while held as prisoners of war, and is awarded 
            posthumously to the next of kin of members of the Armed 
            Forces who are killed in action against an enemy of the 
            United States or who die of wounds received in action 
            against an enemy of the United States;
    Whereas the Purple Heart was established on August 7, 1782, during 
            the Revolutionary War, when General George Washington 
            issued an order establishing the Badge of Military Merit;
    Whereas the award of the Purple Heart ceased with the end of the 
            Revolutionary War, but was revived in 1932, the 200th 
            anniversary of George Washington's birth, out of respect 
            for his memory and military achievements; and
    Whereas areas observing National Purple Heart Recognition Day is a 
            fitting tribute to George Washington and to the more than 
            1.5 million recipients of the Purple Heart: Now, therefore, 
            be it

            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 27

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
§ 22.21 Discovery. ( a ) The following types of discovery are authorized: ( 1 ) Requests for production of documents for inspection and copying;
( 2 ) Requests for admissions of the authenticity of any relevant document or of the truth of any relevant fact;
( 3 ) Written interrogatories; and
( 4 ) Depositions.
( b ) For the purpose of this section and §§ 22.22 and 22.23, the term *documents* includes information, documents, reports, answers, records, accounts, papers, and other data and documentary evidence. Nothing contained herein shall be interpreted to require the creation of a document.
( c ) Unless mutually agreed to by the parties, discovery is available only as ordered by the ALJ. The ALJ shall regulate the timing of discovery.
( d ) *Motions for discovery.* ( 1 ) A party seeking discovery may file a motion with the ALJ. Such a motion shall be accompanied by a copy of the requested discovery, or in the case of depositions, a summary of the scope of the proposed deposition.
( 2 ) Within ten days of service, a party may file an opposition to the motion and/or a motion for protective order as provided in § 22.24.
( 3 ) The ALJ may grant a motion for discovery only if he finds that the discovery sought— ( i ) Is necessary for the expeditious, fair, and reasonable consideration of the issues;
( ii ) Is not unduly costly or burdensome;
( iii ) Will not unduly delay the proceeding; and
( iv ) Does not seek privileged information.
( 4 ) The burden of showing that discovery should be allowed is on the party seeking discovery.
( 5 ) The ALJ may grant discovery subject to a protective order under § 22.24.
( e ) *Depositions.* ( 1 ) If a motion for deposition is granted, the ALJ shall issue a subpoena for the deponent, which may require the deponent to produce documents. The subpoena shall specify the time and place at which the deposition will be held.
( 2 ) The party seeking to depose shall serve the subpoena in the manner prescribed in § 22.8.
( 3 ) The deponent may file with the ALJ a motion to quash the subpoena or a motion for a protective order within ten days of service.
( 4 ) The party seeking to depose shall provide for the taking of a verbatim transcript of the deposition, which it shall make available to all other parties for inspection and copying.
( f ) Each party shall bear its own costs of discovery.
§ 1960.68 Prohibition against discrimination. Section 1904.36 of this chapter refers to Section 11(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act. For Federal agencies, the words “Section 11(c)” shall be read as “Executive Order 12196 Section 1-201(f).” Note to § 1960.68 :
Section 11(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act only applies to private sector employers and the U.S. Postal Service. The corresponding prohibitions against discrimination applicable to Federal employers are contained in Section 1-201(f) of Executive Order 12196, 45 FR 12769, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp. p. 145.
Exhibit 32.1

Statement Furnished Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned are the President and Chief Financial Officer of Patriot Motorcycle Corporation (the Company). This Certificate is made pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the three months ended December 31, 2004 (the 10-QSB Report).

The undersigned certifies that the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and that the information contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                       | 
|Date: January 12, 2007 |  | /s/ MICHEL ATTIAS      
|                       |  | Michel Attias          
|                       |  | President              
|                       | 
|Date: January 12, 2007 |  | /s/ DAVID M. GERNAK    
|                       |  | David M. Gernak        
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Patriot Motorcycle
Corporation and will be retained by Patriot Motorcycle Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 5017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01885]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8614]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Magna Carta'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``The Magna Carta,'' imported from abroad 
for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement 
with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Houston Museum of 
Natural Science, Houston, TX, from on or about February 14, 2014, until 
on or about August 17, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 23, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-01885 Filed 1-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
----

----

I Meddelanden

Kommissionen

----

Eurons växelkurs (1)

30 augusti 2004

(2004/C 218/01)

1 Euro= 

----

(1)

Källa: Referensväxelkurs offentliggjord av Europeiska centralbanken.

----

----

Förhandsanmälan av en koncentration

(Ärende COMP/M.3530 – TeliaSonera AB/Orange A/S)

(2004/C 218/02)

(Text av betydelse för EES)

----

(1)EUT L 24, 29.1.2004, s. 1.

----
#### § 2700.35 Time to file.

A complaint for compensation under section 111 of the Act, 30 U.S.C. 821, shall be filed within 90 days after the beginning of the period during which the complainants are idled or would have been idled by the order that gives rise to the claim.
§ 1960.36 General provisions. ( a ) The occupational safety and health committees described in this subpart are organized and maintained basically to monitor and assist an agency's safety and health program. These committees assist agencies to maintain an open channel of communication between employees and management concerning safety and health matters in agency workplaces. The committees provide a method by which employees can utilize their knowledge of workplace operations to assist agency management to improve policies, conditions, and practices.
( b ) Agencies may elect to establish safety and health committees meeting the minimum requirements contained in this subpart. Where such committees are not established or fail to meet the minimum requirements established by the Secretary, the Secretary is authorized by section 1-401(i) of Executive Order 12196 to conduct unannounced inspections of agency workplaces when the Secretary determines them necessary.