alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1915.162 Ship's boilers. ( a ) Before work is performed in the fire, steam, or water spaces of a boiler where employees may be subject to injury from the direct escape of a high temperature medium such as steam, or water, oil, or other medium at a high temperature entering from an interconnecting system, the employer shall insure that the following steps are taken: ( 1 ) The isolation and shutoff valves connecting the dead boiler with the live system or systems shall be secured, blanked, and then locked or tagged, in accordance with § 1915.89, indicating that employees are working on the boiler. This lock or tag shall not be removed nor the valves unblanked until it is determined that this may be done without creating a hazard to the employees working on the boiler, or until the work on the boiler is completed, in accordance with § 1915.89. When valves are welded instead of bolted, at least two isolation and shutoff valves connecting the dead boiler with the live system or systems shall be secured, and then locked or tagged, in accordance with § 1915.89.
( 2 ) Drain connections to atmosphere on all of the dead interconnecting systems shall be opened for visual observation of drainage.
( 3 ) A warning sign calling attention to the fact that employees are working in the boilers shall be hung in a conspicuous location in the engine room. This sign shall not be removed until it is determined that the work is completed and all employees are out of the boilers.
[47 FR 16986, Apr. 20, 1982, as amended at 76 FR 24711, May 2, 2011]
§ 22.13 Parties to the hearing. ( a ) The parties to the hearing shall be the defendant and the authority.
( b ) Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3730(c)(5), a private plaintiff under the False Claims Act may participate in these proceedings to the extent authorized by the provisions of that Act.
§ 23.210 Contract clause. ( a ) *Contract clause.* The contractor, as a condition of payment, shall abide by the terms of the applicable Executive Order minimum wage contract clause referred to in § 23.110(a).
( b ) *Flow-down requirement.* The contractor and any subcontractors shall include in any covered subcontracts the Executive Order minimum wage contract clause referred to in § 23.110(a) and shall require, as a condition of payment, that the subcontractor include the minimum wage contract clause in any lower-tier subcontracts. The prime contractor and any upper-tier contractor shall be responsible for the compliance by any subcontractor or lower-tier subcontractor with the Executive Order minimum wage requirements, whether or not the contract clause was included in the subcontract.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Banking Act of 1935

              														Banking Act of 1935, August 23, 1935.						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/983,			accessed on August 26, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
§ 1977.15 Filing of complaint for discrimination. ( a ) *Who may file.* A complaint of section 11(c) discrimination may be filed by the employee himself, or by a representative authorized to do so on his behalf.
( b ) *Nature of filing.* No particular form of complaint is required.
( c ) *Place of filing.* Complaint should be filed with the Area Director (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) responsible for enforcement activities in the geographical area where the employee resides or was employed.
( d ) *Time for filing.* ( 1 ) Section 11(c)(2) provides that an employee who believes that he has been discriminated against in violation of section 11(c)(1) “may, within 30 days after such violation occurs,” file a complaint with the Secretary of Labor.
( 2 ) A major purpose of the 30-day period in this provision is to allow the Secretary to decline to entertain complaints which have become stale. Accordingly, complaints not filed within 30 days of an alleged violation will ordinarily be presumed to be untimely.
( 3 ) However, there may be circumstances which would justify tolling of the 30-day period on recognized equitable principles or because of strongly extenuating circumstances, e.g., where the employer has concealed, or misled the employee regarding the grounds for discharge or other adverse action; or where the discrimination is in the nature of a continuing violation. The pendency of grievance-arbitration proceedings or filing with another agency, among others, are circumstances which do not justify tolling the 30-day period. In the absence of circumstances justifying a tolling of the 30-day period, untimely complaints will not be processed.
[38 FR 2681, Jan. 29, 1973, as amended at 50 FR 32846, Aug. 15, 1985]
### Native and contaminated ground waters in the Long Beach-Santa Ana area, California

By: Arthur M. PiperA. A. Garrett

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1136

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 11**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 12**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 13**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 14**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 15**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 16**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 17**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 18**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 19**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0194

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

EVAN DALE TWIFORD,

Defendant and Appellant

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 6, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 27 2024

02/27/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0194
On-Site Safety Checklist

Pre-flight

* Reviewed targeted area through Google Earth for any obstructions

* Reviewed area for any FAA restricted fly zones or other areas of concern

* Walked the hover area or path of flight to check for any areas on concern

Flight Set-up

* Advise anyone within “Launch/Landing” area of safety and 50’ requirement

* Unpack and check DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ for any visible signs of damage

* Turn on Remote Controller and observe that both power and Wi-Fi are green

* Ensure launch zone is clear and turn on DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ battery

* Toggle S1 & S2 switches five times to set GPS recalc & failsafe landing zone

* Wait for solid GPS lights (Solid Green slow flashing)

* Spin DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ 360o both Horizontal and Vertically to ensure lock

* Review Launch Site one last time before lift off

* Engage motors and start straight horizontal lift to desired altitude

In Flight

* Monitor both GPS Lock (# satellites) / Battery Level every minute

* Watch for any changes to the “Launch/Landing” area of safety and advise as necessary

* Watch for any irregular craft behavior and land immediately if necessary

* Return the craft to the landing area within 20% of battery life

* Announce that the craft is returning for landing

* Visual check that the 50’ rule is observed / Otherwise hover until 50’ is observed

* Slowly bring the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ in for a landing
Post-Flight

* Turn off Battery on Craft first, then the Remote Controller

* Store all equipment in their cases before allowing observes to approach

Other Safety Factors

* We will not fly within 1 mile of FAA Restricted Zones

* We will not fly over 400’ of the current launch elevation

* Will not fly past the current line of sight

* We will not fly if a 50” Launch/Landing parameter cannot be established

* We will land the craft immediately of any technical issues occur

* We will land the craft if on-site activity occurs that presents a security concern
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Statement Nos. 33-54879, 33-48490,
33-48673, 33-52797, 33-52799, 333-61351, 333-28621, 333-45212 and 333-56534) and
the Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3
(Registration Statement Nos. 333-93023 and 333-74665) of Kmart Corporation of
our report dated March 24, 2003 relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Detroit, Michigan
March 24, 2003
#### Arlene Cobo, Respondent, v City of New York, Defendant, and Sara Lighting Inc., Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[698 NYS2d 672]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered on or about August 21, 1998, denying the motion of defendant Sara Lighting Inc. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant-appellant dismissing the complaint as against it.

Defendant Sara Lighting is the owner of the premises at 140 Bowery. Defendant leased the premises to its president, Solomon Hartman, who then assigned the lease to third-party defendant, Lite Elite Company, which employed plaintiff. Plaintiff allegedly tripped and fell on the sidewalk in front of the premises as a result of uneven pavement. In plaintiffs action against Sara Lighting as owner, she alleged the owner’s special use of the sidewalk arising from Elite’s placement of a sidewalk awning over the area where she fell, purportedly imposing on the owner responsibilities for maintenance and repair of that sidewalk area. Plaintiff also surmised, on the basis of the absence of records evincing that the City had undertaken the defective repair work in that location, that the repairs must have been done by the owner, a fact it denied.

It is well established that the owner or lessee of premises abutting a public sidewalk owes no duty to the public to keep the sidewalk in a safe condition unless the owner or lessee creates the defective condition or uses the sidewalk where the injury occurred for a special purpose *(Miller v City of New York,*253 AD2d 394). Whether or not Elite, against whom plaintiffs action is barred by virtue of New York’s Workers’ Compensation Law, used the sidewalk for a special use has no bearing on whether the owner used the sidewalk for a special use, for which evidence is entirely lacking in this case. Moreover, upon defendant’s denial that it had undertaken the sidewalk repairs allegedly causing the defective condition, it was plaintiffs burden to proffer proof in admissible form creating a factual issue regarding defendant’s responsibility for causing the defect, a burden not satisfied in this case. The City’s denial, standing alone, does not constitute evidence that defendant had undertaken the repair *(Morrissey v City of New York,*248 AD2d 294). Defendant Sara Lighting is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Concur— Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Buckley, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart Z of Part 1910

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1910 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

#### § 1910.1008 bis-Chloromethyl ether.

See § 1910.1003, *13 carcinogens.*

[61 FR 9245, Mar. 7, 1996]
[No. 27462-1-II.

Division Two.

October 25, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Norman Ralph Ewing, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 00-1-01434-3, Kitty-Ann van Doorninck, J., entered June 5, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J., concurred in by Morgan and Armstrong, JJ.
Exhibit
32.1  Section 1350 Certification





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens First Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, M.
Todd Kanipe, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
            /s/M. Todd KanipeM.
      Todd KanipePresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
            November
      5, 2009





This
certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed ‘filed” for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability
of that section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section.
**EXHIBIT 23**

[KPMG LLP LOGO HERE]

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors

LaBarge, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-53583, 333-108357, 333-124556, 033-62215 and 333-121031) on Form S-8 of LaBarge, Inc. andsubsidiaries (the Company) of our report dated August 28, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of June 29, 2008 and July 1, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each ofthe years in the three-year period ended June 29, 2008, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 29, 2008, which report appears in the June 29, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of the Company.

/s/KPMG LLP

St. Louis, Missouri

August 28, 2008
#### § 1912.26 Approval of agenda.

Each meeting of an advisory committee shall be conducted in accordance with an agenda approved by the Assistant Secretary or his representative designated for this purpose. No particular form for the agency is prescribed.
#### OBERS, et al. v PRINCE

Case No. 86-112 AP (County Court Case No. 85-23340SP05)

Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Appellate Division, Dade County

April 13, 1987

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

John R.' Greenwood for appellants.

No appearance for appellee.

Before RIVKIND, NADLER, FEDER, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Appellant successfully recovered their security deposit from their landlord after a non-jury trial.

The trial judge denied their application for legal fees. Section 83.49(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1985), provides for the prevailing party to recover legal fees in residential tenancy actions concerning the retention of security deposits.

*178An award of attorney’s fees pursuant to this statute is mandatory, not discretionary. See *Durene v. Alcine,*448 So.2d 1208 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

We note that Appellee has not favored this court with a brief. Therefore, on the record presented, we have not been apprised of any legal basis for the trial court’s rejection of the application for legal fees.

We reverse and remand with directions to award appellants reasonable legal fees for services rendered in the trial court to recover the security deposit.

Reversed and remanded with directions.
#### § 23.270 Anti-kickback.

All wages paid to workers performing on or in connection with covered contracts must be paid free and clear and without subsequent deduction (except as set forth in § 23.230), rebate, or kickback on any account. Kickbacks directly or indirectly to the employer or to another person for the employer's benefit for the whole or part of the wage are prohibited.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 944 

To require that an independent review of the efficiency and effectiveness 

of all headquarters offices of the Farm Service Agency of the Department 

of Agriculture be carried out prior to the closure of any county offices. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 20, 2007 

Mr. THUNE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To require that an independent review of the efficiency and 

effectiveness of all headquarters offices of the Farm 

Service Agency of the Department of Agriculture be carried out prior to the closure of any county offices. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INDEPENDENT REVIEW. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Agriculture (re5 ferred to in this Act as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall enter into 

6 a contract with an independent reviewing authority se7 lected by the Secretary to carry out an independent review 

8 of the efficiency and effectiveness of operations at all 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 944 IS

1 headquarters offices of the Farm Service Agency, includ2 ing— 

3 (1) all State offices; 

4 (2) the National Headquarters office in Wash5 ington, D.C.; 

6 (3) the Kansas City office; and 

7 (4) the Salt Lake City office. 

8 (b) REQUIREMENTS.—The review described in sub9 section (a) shall include a review for each office of— 

10 (1) management practices; 

11 (2) information technology purchases and 

12 deliverables; 

13 (3) software development; 

14 (4) contractor hiring practices and related cost15 savings; and 

16 (5) such other factors as the independent re17 viewing authority considers to be relevant to the effi18 ciency and effectiveness of operations at each office. 

19 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 30 days after the date 

20 of completion of the independent review, the independent 

21 reviewing authority shall submit to the Secretary, the 

22 Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representa23 tives, and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and 

24 Forestry of the Senate a report that contains— 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•S 944 IS

1 (1) a description of the results of the study; 

2 and 

3 (2) recommendations for improving the effi4 ciency and effectiveness of operations at each office. 

5 (d) PROHIBITION.—The Secretary may not close or 

6 consolidate any county office of the Farm Service Agency 

7 before the date on which the Secretary determines that 

8 each headquarters office has implemented the rec9 ommendations for that office described in subsection 

10 (c)(2). 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS