alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Special Education /
              - 11.1 Special Education—Students Ages 6-21 Served under IDEA, Part B, as a Percentage of Population

## Table 11.1: Special Education—Students Ages Six to 21 Served under IDEA, Part B, as a Percentage of Population: Fall 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SERENA Software, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2006 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, Robert I. Pender, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of SERENA Software, Inc. certify that, to my knowledge:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of SERENA Software, Inc. at the dates and for the
periods indicated.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/S/    ROBERT I. PENDER,
JR.Robert I. Pender, Jr. Senior Vice President, Finance And Administration, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial And Accounting Officer)


Date: December 15, 2006

This Certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### F. W. WOOLWORTH CO v. WILBOIS

Ohio Appeals, 7th Dist, Mahoning Co

Decided March 29, 1929

Mr. Franklin B. Powers, Youngstown, for Woolworth Co.

Mr. Harry Rapport, Youngstown, for Wilbois.

Opinion by FARR, J.

POLLOCK & ROBERTS, J. J. concur.
**EXHIBIT
      32**


**STATEMENT
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol Federal Financial (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), we, John B. Dicus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kent
      G. Townsend, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company
                as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements
                included in such Report.







Date:   February
      5,
      2007                                      By: /s/
      John B.
      Dicus


John B. Dicus, President and


Chief Executive Officer





Date:   February
      5, 2007   By: /s/
      Kent G.
      Townsend


Kent G. Townsend, Executive Vice President,


Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
[No. 49522-4-I.

Division One.

December 9, 2002.]

#### Snohomish County, *Respondent,*v. Bruce Rugg, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 00-2-03317-4, Joseph A. Thibodeau, J., entered July 5, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kennedy, J., concurred in by Grosse and Baker, JJ. Now published at 115 Wn. App. 218.
#### §§ 2706.141-2706.148 [Reserved]
# Daily precip at ADRS 2006-2011
639 A.2d 1087

#### Keshawn WILLIAMS v. STATE of Maryland.

No. 116,

Sept. Term, 1993.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

April 19, 1994.

John L. Kopolow, Asst. Public Defender (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender, Susan L. Jordan, Asst. Public Defender, all on brief), Baltimore, for petitioner.

Mary Ellen Barbera, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., both on brief), Baltimore, for respondent.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, KARWACKI, BELL and RAKER, JJ., and CHARLES E. ORTH, Jr.,* Judge of the Court of Appeals (retired) and Specially Assigned.

*

 Orth, J., retired, and specially assigned, participated in the hearing and conference of this case but died prior to the adoption and filing of this order.

*536ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari in the above entitled case having been granted and heard, it is this 19th day of April, 1994

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.
- 568 - 

### N ebraska 

### S upreme 

### C ourt 

### A dva nc e 

### S heets 

### 297 N ebraska 

### R eports
COHAN v . MEDICAL IMAGING CONSULTANTS
Cite as 297 Neb. 568



### M ary 

### C oha n a n d 

### T erry 

### C oha n 

### , i n dividually

a n d as wife a n d husba n d 

### , appella n ts a n d

c ross



### - appellees 

### , v



### . M edi c al 

### I magi n g 

### C o n sulta n ts 

### , P .C., et al 

### ., appellees

a n d c ross



### - appella n ts



### . ___ N.W.2d ___

Filed August 25, 2017. No. S-16-145.

suppleme n tal opi n io n 

### Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: J ames 

### T

. G leaso n 

### , Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinion modi

fied. Motions for rehearing overruled.

Richard J. Rensch and Sean P. Rensch, of Rensch & Rensch Law, P.C., L.L.O., for appellants.

David D. Ernst and Kellie Chesire Olson, of Pansing, Hogan, Ernst & Bachman, L.L.P., for appellees Medical Imaging Consultants, P.C., and Robert M. Faulk, M.D.

William R. Settles and Kate Geyer Johnson, of Lamson, Dugan & Murray, L.L.P., for appellees Bellevue Obstetrics and Gynecology Associates, P.C., et al.

H eavi c a n 

### , C.J., W right 

### , M iller



### - L erma n 

### , C assel 

### , S ta c y 

### , and K el c h 

### , JJ. Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 10/13/2017 08:12 AM CDT- 569 - 

### N ebraska 

### S upreme 

### C ourt 

### A dva nc e 

### S heets 

### 297 N ebraska 

### R eports
COHAN v . MEDICAL IMAGING CONSULTANTS
Cite as 297 Neb. 568



### P er 

### C uriam



### . We consider the appellees’ motions for rehearing concern

ing our opinion in Cohan v. Medical Imaging Consultants

. 1 

### We overrule the motions, but we modify the original opinion as follows: In the section of the opinion designated “ 3. C ross



### - A ppeals

by 

### A ppellees 

### ,” we add a sentence at the end of the first paragraph, 2 

### such that the paragraph reads as follows: Appellees’ cross-appeals assign as error the admission of Dr. Naughton’s testimony. Appellees moved to strike Dr. Naughton’s testimony because they claimed that only Mary’s prognosis at the time of trial was relevant and that Nebraska did not recognize a theory of recovery based upon loss of chance. The district court, in overruling the motions to strike, found that Dr. Naughton’s opinion was relevant for the limited purpose of establishing that early discovery of cancer leads to a better prognosis. We understand the district court to have used “prognosis” to refer to the risk of recurrence and the probability of an improved outcome. The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. F ormer opi n io n modified



### . M otio n s for reheari n g overruled



### . F u n ke 

### , J., not participating.

1 Cohan v. Medical Imaging Consultants, ante p. 111, ___ N.W.2d ___

(2017).

2 Id. at 129-130, ___ N.W.2d at ___.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                   SUBSIDIARIES OF UNITED LEISURE CORPORATION

                 Set forth below is a list of all subsidiaries of United
Leisure Corporation, indicating their jurisdictions of incorporation.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                 Name                                       Jurisdiction of Incorporation
                 ----                                       -----------------------------
<S>                                                                 <C>
Lion Country Safari, Inc.-- California                              Florida

Planet Kids, Inc.                                                   California

LCS Tours, Inc.                                                     Delaware

Frasiers Frontier, Inc.                                             California

Camp Frasier, Inc.                                                  California

United Leisure Interactive, Inc.                                    Delaware
</TABLE>
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Special Education /
              - 11.4 Special Education—Educational Environment—Students Ages 6-21 Served under IDEA, Part B that Spent 40 Percent or More Time Inside Regular Class

## Table 11.4: Special Education—Educational Environment: Students Ages Six to 21 Served under IDEA, Part B that Spent 40 Percent or More Time Inside Regular Class: Fall 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Student Advantage,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Raymond V. Sozzi, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 15, 2003              /s/ Raymond V. Sozzi, Jr.
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Raymond V. Sozzi, Jr.
                                 Chairman of the Board of Directors,
                                 President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Student Advantage, Inc. and will be retained by Student Advantage,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Student Advantage,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Sevim Perry, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Treasurer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 15, 2003              /s/ Sevim M. Perry
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Sevim M. Perry
                                 Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Student Advantage, Inc. and will be retained by Student Advantage,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       9
<CIK>                           1073475 
<NAME>                          CITIZENS FIRST CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                          335,338
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>          394,514
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                5,900,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>     1,781,186
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>          0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>            0
<LOANS>                         2,518,649
<ALLOWANCE>                     25,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  12,813,423
<DEPOSITS>                      4,221,427
<SHORT-TERM>                    0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>             654,222
<LONG-TERM>                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        7,357,477
<OTHER-SE>                      580,297
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>  12,813,423
<INTEREST-LOAN>                 11,485
<INTEREST-INVEST>               6,166
<INTEREST-OTHER>                36,925
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                54,576
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>              8,028
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              19,920
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>           34,656
<LOAN-LOSSES>                   25,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>              743,706
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                 459,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 295,464
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    295,464
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.83
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                  2.720
<LOANS-NON>                     0
<LOANS-PAST>                    0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                 0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                   0
<RECOVERIES>                    0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>               25,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>            25,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>             0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>         0
        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF

PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CALVIN HENDERSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 80 WM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29 th day of February , 2024, the Petition for Leave to File Petition

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
§ 2530.200a-1 Relationship of the Act and the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. ( a ) Part 2 of title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) contains minimum standards that a plan which is an employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(2) of the Act and which is covered under part 2 must satisfy. (For a general explanation of the coverage of part 2, see § 2530.201-1.) Substantially identical requirements are imposed by subchapter D of chapter 1 of subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (hereinafter referred to as “the Code”) for plans seeking qualification for certain tax benefits under the Code. In general, the Code provisions apply to “qualified” pension, profit-sharing, and stock bonus plans described in section 401(a) of the Code, annuity plans described in section 403(a) of the Code and bond purchase plans described in section 405(a) of the Code. The standards contained in title I of the Act apply generally to both “nonqualified' and “qualified” employee pension benefit plans. The standards contained in the Act, and the related Code provisions, are “minimum” standards. In general, more liberal plan provisions (in terms of the benefit to be derived by the employee) are not prohibited.
( b ) For a definition of the term “employee pension benefit plan”, see section 3(2) of the Act and § 2510.3-2.
( c ) For a statement of the coverage of part 2 of the Act, see sections 4 and 201 of the Act and §§ 2510.3-2, 2510.3-3, 2530.201-1 and 2530.201-2.
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: <jschwendeman@firstenergycorp.com> Date: 7/7/2010 10:20 AM Subject: Re: Electronic Copy, FE Ext req Attachments: pic29250.jpg; FE ExtReq.pdf

Greetings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnair e unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, (Embedded image moved to file: pic29250.jpg)

From: jschwendeman@firstenergycorp.com

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/07/2010 09:56 AM

Subject: Electronic Copy, FE Ext req

Attached for your electronic files is a pdf copy of the FirstEnergy Corp. deadline extension request for the Effluent Guidelines ICR questionnaire. A hard copy of this request was submitted last week by courier.

(See attached file: FE ExtReq.pdf)

----------------------------------------- The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.(See attached file: FE ExtReq.pdf)