alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Bank Merger Act (Federal Deposit Insurance Act, Amendment)

              														Bank Merger Act (Federal Deposit Insurance Act, Amendment), May 13, 1960.						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1024,			accessed on August 27, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-0474

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM213AD

A330-92-3077 --- 6/17/08

A340-92-4078 --- 6/17/08

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

 

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of NEON Systems, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian D. Helman, the principalfinancial and accounting officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.(S)1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                 The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                 The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| November 15, 2004                           |
|---------------------------------------------|
|                                        |
| /s/ Brian D. Helman                         |   |
| Brian D. Helman                             |
| principal financial and  accounting officer |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2


                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION


I, Michael D. Cahill, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tower Financial
Corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


     Date: August 13, 2004


                                     /s/ Michael D. Cahill
                                     ---------------------------
                                     Michael D. Cahill
                                     Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
# EUR-Lex - 32000R0115 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R0115

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 115/2000 of 19 January 2000 on the issue of import licences for certain products falling within CN codes 1701, 1702, 1703 and 1704 and qualifying as ACP/OCT originating products **

*
Official Journal L 014 , 20/01/2000 P. 0014 - 0014 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 115/2000

of 19 January 2000

on the issue of import licences for certain products falling within CN codes 1701, 1702, 1703 and 1704 and qualifying as ACP/OCT originating products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 91/482/EEC of 25 July 1991 on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Community(1), (hereinafter referred to as "OCT Decision"), as last amended by Decision 97/803/EC(2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2553/97 of 17 December on rules for issuing import licences for certain products covered by CN-Codes 1701, 1702, 1703 and 1704 and qualifying as ACP/OCT(3), originating products, and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 108b(1) of the OCT Decision allows ACP/OCT cumulation of origin in the case of products falling within CN codes 1701, 1702, 1703 and 1704 up to an annual quantity of 3000 tonnes of sugar;

(2) two applications have been submitted to the national authorities in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 2553/97 for the issue of import licences covering a total quantity exceeding the 3000 tonnes allowed under the OCT Decision;

(3) Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2553/97 provides that, where licence applications cover annual quantities in excess of 3000 tonnes of sugar, the Commission is to adopt a regulation fixing a single reducing coefficient to be applied to each application submitted and suspend the submission of further applications during the year in progress;

(4) the Commission must therefore fix the reducing coefficient for the issue of import licences and suspend submission of further licence applications for 2000,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Import licences covered by applications submitted under Artile 108b of the OCT Decision on 3 January 2000 for a quantity of 732,300 tonnes of sugar falling within CN code 1701 11 90 and on 6 January for a quantity of 3000 tonnes of sugar falling within CN code 1701 99 10 shall be issued for 80,37939 % of the quantity applied for.

Article 2

The submission of further applications for 2000 is suspended.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 January 2000.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 263, 19.9.1991, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 329, 29.11.1997, p. 50.

(3) OJ L 349, 19.12.1997, p. 26.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Crdentia Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, James J. TerBeest, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to myknowledge:

 

1.                                       the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates andfor the periods indicated.

 

This Certification has not been, and shallnot be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 
| Date: November 14, 2005 | By:                      | /S/ James J. TerBeest |   |
|------------------------------|--------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|                         | James J.  TerBeest       |
|                         | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

1

----
```

[115th Congress Public Law 222]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 1560]]

Public Law 115-222
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to delay the reduction in 
    Federal medical assistance percentage for Medicaid personal care 
services furnished without an electronic visit verification system, and 
       for other purposes. <<NOTE: July 30, 2018 -  [H.R. 6042]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DELAY IN REDUCTION OF FMAP FOR MEDICAID PERSONAL CARE 
                              SERVICES FURNISHED WITHOUT AN 
                              ELECTRONIC VISIT VERIFICATION 
                              SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1903(l) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1396b(l)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking ``January 1, 2019'' and inserting 
                ``January 1, 2020''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ``2019 
                and''; and
            (2) in paragraph (4)(A)(i), by striking ``calendar quarters 
        in 2019'' and inserting ``calendar quarters in 2020''.

    (b) Sense of Congress on Stakeholder Input Regarding Electronic 
Visit Verification Systems.--It is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services should--
                    (A) convene at least one public meeting in 2018 for 
                the purpose of soliciting ongoing feedback from Medicaid 
                stakeholders on guidance issued by the Centers for 
                Medicare & Medicaid Services on May 16, 2018, regarding 
                electronic visit verification; and
                    (B) communicate with such stakeholders regularly and 
                throughout the implementation process in a clear and 
                transparent manner to monitor beneficiary protections;
            (2) such stakeholders should include State Medicaid 
        directors, beneficiaries, family caregivers, individuals and 
        entities who provide personal care services or home health care 
        services, Medicaid managed care organizations, electronic visit 
        verification vendors, and other stakeholders, as determined by 
        the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; and

[[Page 132 STAT. 1561]]

            (3) taking into account stakeholder input on the 
        implementation of the electronic visit verification requirement 
        under the Medicaid program is vital in order to ensure that the 
        Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is aware and able to 
        mitigate any adverse outcomes with the implementation of this 
        policy.

    Approved July 30, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6042:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            June 19, considered and passed House.
            July 17, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
f8k111609ex10i_celsius.htm


     

    Exhibit
10.1

    


    SECURITIES
OFFERED AND PURCHASED HEREBY HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT
OF 1933 (THE “1933 ACT”), OR ANY STATE OR PROVINCIAL SECURITIES ACTS AND ARE
BEING OFFERED AND SOLD IN RELIANCE UPON EXEMPTIONS FROM THE REGISTRATION
REQUIREMENTS OF THESE ACTS.  SUCH SECURITIES MAY NOT BE REOFFERED FOR
SALE OR RESOLD OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED UNLESS THEY ARE REGISTERED UNDER THE
APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE 1933 ACT, STATE OR PROVINCIAL SECURITIES ACT OR ARE
EXEMPT FROM SUCH REGISTRATION.  THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN
APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (“SEC”) OR BY
ANY STATE OR PROVINCIAL SECURITIES ADMINISTRATION OR REGULATORY AUTHORITY NOR
HAS THE SEC OR ANY STATE OR PROVINCIAL SECURITIES ADMINISTRATION PASSED UPON THE
ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS AGREEMENT. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A
CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

    


    CELSIUS
HOLDINGS, INC.

    NOTICE
OF EXERCISING PURCHASE RIGHTS FOR SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK

    AND
SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT

     

    
      	TO: 	
              CELSIUS
      HOLDINGS, INC. (the "Corporation")

              140
      NE 4th
      Avenue, Suite C, Delray Beach, Florida
  33483

            


    

     

    CDS
Ventures of South Florida, LLC (hereinafter referred to as the “Purchaser”) hereby gives
notice of the exercise of its right to purchase shares of the Corporation’s
Series A Preferred Stock pursuant to Section 2.1 of the Securities Purchase
Agreement between the Purchaser and the Corporation dated December 12,
2008.

    


    In
connection with the forgoing notice, the Purchaser hereby irrevocably subscribes
for and agrees to purchase from the Corporation, 2,000 shares of the
Corporation’s Series A  Preferred Stock for the total consideration
$2,000,000 (Two Million Dollars) representing a subscription price of US $
1,000.00 per share.

    


    EXECUTED
by the Purchaser this 31st day of March, 2009

     

         /s/
William H.
Milmoe                                 


    William
H. Milmoe, President

    CDS
Ventures of South Florida, LLC

    


    REPRESENTATION
OF PURCHASER:

    
      	
              1.  

            	
              The
      Purchaser represents that the Purchaser is an Affiliate of the
      Corporation.

            


    

    
      	
              2.  

            	
              The
      Purchaser represents that payment will be made as follows: $1 million
      within 5 business days and $1 million on or before May 1st,
      2009.

            


    

    


        s/
William H.
Milmoe                         


    William
H. Milmoe, President

    CDS
Ventures of South Florida, LLC

    


    ACCEPTANCE:  The
Corporation hereby accepts the above notice of exercise and
subscription.

    


     

    CELSIUS HOLDINGS,
INC.                                                                           Dated:   March
31, 2009

     
 

    


    Per:    /s/ Jan
Norelid                                   


             
Jan Norelid, CFO
#### In the Matter of James F. Laverty, Appellant, against James E. Finegan et al., Constituting the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, Respondents.

Argued September 27, 1937;

decided October 12, 1937.

*556
      *Robert L. Callahan*and *Joseph J. Reiher*for appellant.

*Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel (William S.*Gaud, *Jr., Paxton Blair*and *Robert H. Schaffer of*counsel), for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
**Exhibit 23**

 

**[ PwC Letterhead ]**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-18417 and No. 333-98963) of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation of our report dated June 15, 2005 relating to theconsolidated financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated June 15, 2005 relating to thefinancial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Charlotte, North Carolina 

July 8, 2005
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 16, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 16, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19A2274. ORLANDO INGRAM et al. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
#### § 18.301 Presumptions in general.

Except as otherwise provided by Act of Congress, or by rules or regulations prescribed by the administrative agency pursuant to statutory authority, or pursuant to executive order, a presumption imposes on the party against whom it is directed the burden of going forward with evidence to rebut or meet the presumption, but does not shift to such party the burden of proof in the sense of the risk of nonpersuasion, which remains throughout the trial upon the party on whom it was originally cast.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 944 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 944

      To require that an independent review of the efficiency and 
effectiveness of all headquarters offices of the Farm Service Agency of 
 the Department of Agriculture be carried out prior to the closure of 
                          any county offices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 20, 2007

   Mr. Thune introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To require that an independent review of the efficiency and 
effectiveness of all headquarters offices of the Farm Service Agency of 
 the Department of Agriculture be carried out prior to the closure of 
                          any county offices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INDEPENDENT REVIEW.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Agriculture (referred to in this 
Act as the ``Secretary'') shall enter into a contract with an 
independent reviewing authority selected by the Secretary to carry out 
an independent review of the efficiency and effectiveness of operations 
at all headquarters offices of the Farm Service Agency, including--
            (1) all State offices;
            (2) the National Headquarters office in Washington, D.C.;
            (3) the Kansas City office; and
            (4) the Salt Lake City office.
    (b) Requirements.--The review described in subsection (a) shall 
include a review for each office of--
            (1) management practices;
            (2) information technology purchases and deliverables;
            (3) software development;
            (4) contractor hiring practices and related cost-savings; 
        and
            (5) such other factors as the independent reviewing 
        authority considers to be relevant to the efficiency and 
        effectiveness of operations at each office.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 30 days after the date of completion of 
the independent review, the independent reviewing authority shall 
submit to the Secretary, the Committee on Agriculture of the House of 
Representatives, and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and 
Forestry of the Senate a report that contains--
            (1) a description of the results of the study; and
            (2) recommendations for improving the efficiency and 
        effectiveness of operations at each office.
    (d) Prohibition.--The Secretary may not close or consolidate any 
county office of the Farm Service Agency before the date on which the 
Secretary determines that each headquarters office has implemented the 
recommendations for that office described in subsection (c)(2).
                                 <all>
```