alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

IN THE MATTER OF THE RESIGNATION OF ELIZABETH C. BONN, BAR NO. 7998. No. 84047 

# FllLED

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR RESIGNATION This is a joint petition by the State Bar of Nevada and attorney Elizabeth C. Bonn for her resignation from the Nevada bar.

SCR 98(5) provides that Nevada attorneys who are not actively practicing law in this state may resign from the state bar if certain conditions are met. The petition includes statements from state bar staff confirming that no disciplinary, fee dispute arbitration, or client security fund matters are pending against Bonn; and that she is current on all membership fee payments and other financial commitments relating to her practice of law in this state. See SCR 98(5)(a)(1)-(2).

Bar counsel has recommended that the resignation be approved, and the Board of Governors has approved the application for resignation. See SCR 98(5)(a)(2). Bonn acknowledges that her resignation is irrevocable and that the state bar retains continuing jurisdiction with respect to matters involving a past member's conduct prior to resignation. See SCR 98(5)(c)-(d). Finally, Bonn has submitted an affidavit of compliance with SCR 115. See SCR 98(5)(e).



# It- V 13 SISUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A
• rThe petition satisfies the requirements of SCR 98(5).

Accordingly, we approve attorney Elizabeth C. Bonn's resignation. SCR 98(5)(a)(2). The petition is hereby granted.

It is so ORDERED.

cc: Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada Elizabeth C. Bonn Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court

SLJPRFME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(01 1947A AD7

. . , .A131
|   | 1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company      as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements      included in such Report. |
|--------|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/Kathleen      M. Jepson                             |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Senior      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| May      12, 2009                                      |

----
§ 4003.35 Decision on request for reconsideration. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2), decisions on requests for reconsideration will be issued by the same department of PBGC that issued the initial determination, by an official whose level of authority in that department is higher than that of the person who issued the initial determination. ( 1 ) When an initial determination is issued by a Director of a department, the Director of a department (or an official designated by the Director of a department) will issue the decision on a request for reconsideration of an initial determination other than one described in § 4003.1(d)(2)(ii).
( 2 ) The Director (or an official designated by the Director) will issue the decision on a request for reconsideration of an initial determination described in § 4003.1(d)(2)(ii).
( b ) The decision on a request for reconsideration shall be in writing, specify the relief granted, if any, state the reason(s) for the decision, and state that the person has exhausted his or her administrative remedies.
( c ) The decision on a request for reconsideration constitutes the final agency action by PBGC with respect to the initial determination that was the subject of the request for reconsideration and is binding on all persons who participated in the request for reconsideration.
[61 FR 34012, July 1, 1996, as amended at 73 FR 38120, July 3, 2008; 85 FR 10284, Feb. 24, 2020; 88 FR 76664, Nov. 7, 2023]
#### § 2580.412-12 Relationship of determining the amount of the bond to “handling”.

A determination of whether persons falling within the definition of administrator, officer or employee are required to be bonded depends on whether they “handle” funds or other property. Determining the amount of the bond is an aspect of the same process in that it requires a determination of what funds or other property are being handled or what amounts of funds or other property are subject to risk of loss with respect to the duties or powers of an administrator, officer or employee of a covered plan. Once this calculation is made, the required amount for which that person must be covered by a bond, either by himself or as a part of a group or class being bonded under a blanket or schedule bond, is not less than 10 percent of the amount “handled” or $1,000, whichever is the greater amount, except that no such bond shall be required in an amount greater than $500,000 by virtue of these regulations. (See § 2580.412-17.)
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


AMENDMENT
NO. 2


TO


LIVEWIRE
ERGOGENICS, INC.


2013
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 


 


WHEREAS , in May of 2013 the Company adopted its 2013 Stock
Incentive Plan, filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission on May 3, 2013 (the “Plan”), covering 5,000,000
shares of Common Stock;


 


WHEREAS , on April 22, 2014, the Board of Directors of the
Company pursuant to Section 9 of the Plan determined to amend the Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance
under the Plan to 15,000,000 shares (the “Amendment”);


 


WHEREAS , on April 22, 2014, by requisite vote of the stockholders
of the Company, the Amendment was approved;


 


WHEREAS , on April 7, 2015, the Board of Directors of the
Company pursuant to Section 9 of the Plan determined to amend the Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance
under the Plan to 150,000,000 shares (the “Amendment”);


 


WHEREAS , on April 7, 2015, by requisite vote of the stockholders
of the Company, the Amendment was approved; and


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


 


1.                  
The first sentence of Section 4(b) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded and replaced as follows:


 


“(b) Number of Shares. Subject
to adjustment as provided in Section 5(i) of the Plan, the total number of shares of Stock which may be purchased or granted directly
by Options, Stock Awards or Restricted Stock Purchase Offers, or purchased indirectly through exercise of Options granted under
the Plan shall not exceed one hundred fifty million (150,000,000).”
Scoring of OPTIMAL 

The Outpatient Physical Therapy Improvement in Movement Assessment Log 

(OPTIMAL) is an instrument that measures difficulty and self-confidence in performing 

21 movements that a patient/client needs to accomplish in order to do various functional 

activities. 

Scoring is relatively simple, and it can be done in three different ways. The most 

expedient way to calculate a total score is to sum the responses (marked on a 1 to 5 

scale) across all 21 items on difficulty and on self-confidence upon both the 

patient’s/client’s admission (baseline) and discharge from physical therapy (final). Then 

subtract the final sum from the baseline sum. The higher the change score, the more the 

patient has improved. If a particular item on the OPTIMAL is marked as "Not 

Applicable," then this item should be dropped completely from the overall scoring. For 

example, suppose that one item is marked "Not Applicable." The best possible score on 

"Difficulty" or "Self-confidence" for this patient would be "20" (1 x 20 items) and the 

worst possible score would be "100" (5 x 20 items). Do not add "9" to the score ("9" is an 

arbitrary coding convention to distinguish the item from missing data if you are entering 

information into a database.) 

Psychometric testing of the instrument also determined that the 21 items form three 

subscales: upper extremity, lower extremity; and trunk mobility. For some patients, it 

may be helpful to analyze changes in difficulty or self-confidence in performing specific 

movements by calculating a subscale score as well as a total score. 

Finally, the instrument includes a question that asks the patient/client, “From the above 

list [referring to the 21 items], choose the 3 activities you would most like to be able to 

do without any difficulty,” which may also provide clinically meaningful information. 

The therapist can calculate a specific item score to appraise the changes between 

admission and discharge scores on these three items. This scoring method allows the 

therapist to determine the outcome of treatment on the ability to perform the movements 

that were most important to the patient/client. This method particularly aids in the clinical 

decision-making process. 

For more information about the psychometric properties of OPTIMAL, as well as 

discussing its scoring, please contact the Division of Practice and Research at the 

American Physical Therapy Association (APTA). 

[updated 02/23/07]
----

----

I Comunicações

Conselho

----

Comunicação relativa à abertura dos contingentes estabelecidos pela Decisão do Conselho de 21 de Junho de 2004, que altera a Decisão do Conselho de 15 de Dezembro de 2003, relativa ao comércio de determinados produtos siderúrgicos entre a Comunidade Europeia e a Ucrânia

(2004/C 167/01)

----

(1)JO L 227 de 26.6.2004.

(2) JO C 150 de 5.6.2004, p. 1.

----

Comissão

----

Taxas de câmbio do euro (1)

25 de Junho de 2004

(2004/C 167/02)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Fonte: Taxas de câmbio de referência publicadas pelo Banco Central Europeu.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                       1,879
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                1,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                  8,637
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            15,270
<PP&E>                                                       4,905
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 344
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             269,831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      372,663
<BONDS>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                     1,734
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                (104,566)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               269,831
<SALES>                                                      4,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             4,987
<CGS>                                                        2,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              295,811
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             7,792
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (298,616)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (298,616)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (298,616)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (.02)



</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

#### §§ 4.157-4.158 [Reserved]
Order entered February 26, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01228

- CV

CLEAN ENERGY , ET AL. , Appellant s

V.

TRILLIUM TRANSPORTAT ION FUELS, LLC , ET AL. , Appell ee s

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 18

- 10489



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellants’ February 22, 2019 unopposed motion for an extension of

time to file their reply brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to April 4, 2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
#### § 35.16 Special benefits for children and the elderly.

If a recipient is operating a program or activity that provides special benefits to the elderly or to children, the use of such age distinctions is presumed to be necessary to the normal operation of the program or activity, notwithstanding the provisions of § 35.12.
# EUR-Lex - 32000R0822 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R0822

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 822/2000 of 19 April 2000 applying a reduction coefficient to refund certificates for goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, as provided for by Article 6b of Regulation (EC) No 1222/94 **

*
Official Journal L 100 , 20/04/2000 P. 0023 - 0023 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 822/2000

of 19 April 2000

applying a reduction coefficient to refund certificates for goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, as provided for by Article 6b of Regulation (EC) No 1222/94

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3448/93 of 6 December 1993 laying down the trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products(1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2491/98(2), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 8(3) thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1222/94 of 30 May 1994 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of granting export refunds on certain agricultural products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, and the criteria for fixing the amount of such refunds(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 701/2000(4), and in particular Article 6b(6) and (8) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) The cumulated amounts of the refunds requested for the certificates already issued come to EUR 305159263. This sum, when added to the amounts for applications made from 10 to 14 April 2000 and taken on an annual basis, might prevent the Commission from meeting its commitments under Article 6b(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1222/94.

(2) A reduction coefficient calculated on the basis of Article 6b(3) and (4) should therefore be applied to amounts requested in the form of certificates during the abovementioned week,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The amounts of certificates for applications lodged for the period from 10 to 14 April 2000 are subject to a reduction coefficient of 0,68.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 April 2000.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 April 2000.

For the Commission

Erkki Liikanen

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 318, 20.12.1993, p. 18.

(2) OJ L 309, 19.11.1998, p. 28.

(3) OJ L 136, 31.5.1994, p. 5.

(4) OJ L 83, 4.4.2000, p. 6.
§ 2570.83 Assessment of civil penalty. ( a ) Except as described in §§ 2570.85 and 2570.86 of this part, subsequent to the payment of the applicable recovery amount pursuant to either a settlement agreement or a court order, the Secretary shall serve on the person liable for making such payment a notice of assessment of civil penalty equal to 20 percent of the applicable recovery amount.
( b ) Service of such notice shall be made either: ( 1 ) By delivering a copy to the person being assessed; if the person is an individual, to the individual; if the person is a partnership, to any partner; if the person is a corporation, association, exchange, or other entity or organization, to any officer of such entity; if the person is an employee benefit plan, to a trustee of such plan; or to any attorney representing any such person;
( 2 ) By leaving a copy at the principal office, place of business, or residence of such individual, partner, officer, trustee, or attorney; or
( 3 ) By mailing a copy to the last known address of such individual, partner, officer, trustee, or attorney.
If service is accomplished by certified mail, service is complete upon mailing. If done by regular mail, service is complete upon receipt by the addressee.
§ 2204.201 Definitions. For the purposes of this part: *Adversary adjudication* means an adjudication under 5 U.S.C. 554 and 29 U.S.C. 659(c) in which the position of the Secretary is represented by counsel or otherwise, subject to certain exclusions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 504(b)(1)(C).
*Agent* means any person other than an attorney who represents a party in a proceeding before the Commission pursuant to § 2200.22 of this chapter.
*Commission* means the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.
*Demand* means the express demand of the Secretary which led to the adversary adjudication, but does not include a recitation by the Secretary of the maximum statutory penalty: ( 1 ) In the administrative complaint; or
( 2 ) Elsewhere when accompanied by an express demand for a lesser amount.
*Excessive demand* means a demand by the Secretary, in an adversary adjudication arising from the Secretary's action to enforce a party's compliance with a statutory requirement that is substantially in excess of the decision of the judge or Commission and is unreasonable when compared with such decision, under the facts and circumstances of the case.
*Final disposition* means the date on which a decision or order disposing of the merits of the adversary adjudication or any other complete resolution of the adversary adjudication, such as a settlement or voluntary dismissal, become final and unappealable, both within the agency and to the courts.
*Judge* means the Administrative Law Judge appointed under 29 U.S.C. 661(j) who presided over the adversary adjudication or presides over an EAJA proceeding.
*Party* means a party, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 551(3), who is: ( 1 ) An individual whose net worth did not exceed $2,000,000 at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated; or
( 2 ) Any owner of an unincorporated business, or any partnership, corporation, association, unit of local government, or organization, the net worth of which did not exceed $7,000,000 at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated, and which had not more than 500 employees at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated; except that an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of such Code, or a cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act, may be a party regardless of the net worth of such organization or cooperative association. For purposes of 5 U.S.C. 504(a)(4), “party” also includes a small entity as defined in 5 U.S.C. 601.
*Position of the Secretary* means, in addition to the position taken by the Secretary in the adversary adjudication, the action or failure to act by the Secretary upon which the adversary adjudication is based, except that fees and other expenses may not be awarded to a party for any portion of the adversary adjudication in which the party has unreasonably protracted the proceedings.
*Secretary* means the Secretary of Labor.
----

----

I Informácie

Komisia

----

Výmenný kurz eura (1)

23. septembra 2004

(2004/C 237/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Zdroj: referenčný výmenný kurz publikovaný ECB.

----

----

Predbežné oznámenie o koncentrácii

(Prípad COMP/M.3502 – ACCOR/CLUB MEDITERRANEE)

Prípad vhodný na zjednodušený postup

(2004/C 237/02)

(Text s významom pre EHP)

----

(1)Ú. v. EÚ L 24, 29.1.2004, s. 1.

(2)  Prístupné na webovej stránke DG COMP:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

----

----

Predbežné oznámenie o koncentrácii

(Prípad COMP/M.3550 – Midewa/Stadtwerke Halle/Fernwasser Sachsen-Anhalt)

(2004/C 237/03)

(Text s významom pre EHP)

----

(1)Ú. v. EÚ L 24, 29.1.2004, s. 1.

----

----

Súhrn rozhodnutí Spoločenstva týkajúcich sa povolení na uvedenie na trh liekov od 15.8.2004 do 15.9.2004

(Uverejnený na základe článku 12 alebo 34 nariadenia Rady (EHS) č. 2309/93 (1))

(2004/C 237/04)

—   Vydanie povolenia na uvedenie na trh (článok 12 nariadenia Rady (EHS) č. 2309/93): Zamietnuté

—   Úprava povolenia na uvedenie na trh (článok 12 nariadenia Rady (EHS) č. 2309/93): Povolená

—   Vydanie povolenia na uvedenie na trh (článok 34 nariadenia Rady (EHS) č. 2309/93): Povolené

—   Úprava povolenia na uvedenie na trh (článok 34 nariadenia Rady (EHS) č. 2309/93): Povolená

----

(1)Ú. v. ES L 214, 24.8.1993, s. 1.

----
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                  ------------



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Marc S. Hermelin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Date: June 27, 2008
      --------------------                     /s/  Marc S. Hermelin
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                                    Marc S. Hermelin
                                          Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                             (Principal Executive Officer)