alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Matthew Forty, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appellate Advocates (Kathleen Wooley of counsel), for appellant.Kings County District Attorney (Jodi L. Mandel and Leonard Joblove of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County (John T. Hecht, J.), rendered April 7, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of theft of services (Penal Law ยง 165.15). Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.</p><p>We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to <i>Anders v California</i> (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (<i>see id.</i>; <a href="../2011/2011_07846.htm" target="_blank"><i>Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.]</i>, 89 AD3d 252</a> [2011]; <i>People v Paige</i>, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; <i>cf. People v Gonzalez</i>, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: October 26, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Serena Software, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2008 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, Jeremy Burton, Chief Executive Officer of Serena Software, Inc. certify that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Serena Software, Inc. at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    JEREMY BURTONJeremy Burton President and Chief Executive Officer And Director


Date: December 12, 2008

This Certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
§ 1955.14 Ex parte communications. ( a ) Except to the extent required for the disposition of *ex parte* matters, the administrative law judge shall not consult any interested person or party or their representative on any fact in issue or on the merits of any matter before him except upon notice and opportunity for all parties to participate.
( b ) ( 1 ) Written or oral communications from interested persons outside the Department of Labor involving any substantive or procedural issues in a proceeding directed to the administrative law judge, the Secretary of Labor, the Assistant Secretary, the Associate Assistant Secretary for Regional Programs, the Solicitor of Labor, or the Associate Solicitor for Occupational Safety and Health, or their staffs shall be deemed *ex parte* communications and are not to be considered part of any record or the basis for any official decision, unless the communication is made by motion to the administrative law judge and served upon all the parties.
( 2 ) To facilitate implementation of this requirement, the above-mentioned offices shall keep a log of such communications which shall be made available to the public and which may, by motion, be entered into the record.
( c ) No employee or agent of the Department of Labor engaged in the investigation or presentation of the withdrawal proceeding governed by this part shall participate or advise in the initial or final decision, except as a witness or counsel in the proceeding.
Exhibit 23.2

LONQUIST & CO. LLC

November 9, 2010

Contango Oil & Gas Company

3700 Buffalo Speedway, Suite 960

Houston, Texas
77098



| | Re: | Contango Oil & Gas Company, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------

Gentlemen:

The firm of Lonquist & Co. LLC consents to the use of its
name and to the use of its projections for Contango Oil & Gas Companys Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenue in Contangos Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010.

Lonquist & Co. LLC has no interests in Contango Oil & Gas Company or in any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is
not to receive any such interest as payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise connected with Contango Oil & Gas Company. Contango Oil & Gas Company does not employ us on a contingent basis.



|                         
|-------------------------
|Yours very truly,        
|                         
|LONQUIST & CO. LLC       
|                         
|/s/ Richard R. Lonquist  
|RICHARD R. LONQUIST, P.E.
§ 2570.112 Service: Copies of documents and pleadings. For 502(c)(6) penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.3 of this title. ( a ) *General.* Copies of all documents shall be served on all parties of record. All documents should clearly designate the docket number, if any, and short title of all matters. All documents to be filed shall be delivered or mailed to the Chief Docket Clerk, Office of Administrative Law Judges, 800 K Street, NW., Suite 400, Washington, DC 20001-8002, or to the OALJ Regional Office to which the proceeding may have been transferred for hearing. Each document filed shall be clear and legible.
( b ) *By parties.* All motions, petitions, pleadings, briefs, or other documents shall be filed with the Office of Administrative Law Judges with a copy, including any attachments, to all other parties of record. When a party is represented by an attorney, service shall be made upon the attorney. Service of any document upon any party may be made by personal delivery or by mailing a copy to the last known address. The Department shall be served by delivery to the Associate Solicitor, Plan Benefits Security Division, ERISA section 502(c)(6) Proceeding, P.O. Box 1914, Washington, DC 20013. The person serving the document shall certify to the manner and date of service.
( c ) *By the Office of Administrative Law Judges.* Service of orders, decisions and all other documents shall be made by regular mail to the last known address.
( d ) *Form of pleadings.* ( 1 ) Every pleading shall contain information indicating the name of the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) as the agency under which the proceeding is instituted, the title of the proceeding, the docket number (if any) assigned by the Office of Administrative Law Judges and a designation of the type of pleading or paper (e.g., notice, motion to dismiss, etc.). The pleading or paper shall be signed and shall contain the address and telephone number of the party or person representing the party. Although there are no formal specifications for documents, they should be typewritten when possible on standard size 81 ⁄ 2 × 11 inch paper.
( 2 ) Illegible documents, whether handwritten, typewritten, photocopied, or otherwise, will not be accepted. Papers may be reproduced by any duplicating process provided all copies are clear and legible.
#### § 2701.4 Request to open or close meeting.

Any person may request that the Commission open a meeting that it has earlier decided to close. Any person whose interest may be directly affected by the opening of a meeting may request that the meeting be closed. Two copies of a request shall be filed in writing with the Executive Director of the Commission at the earliest practicable time, and no later than one hour before the meeting. A request to close shall state the interest of the person that may be adversely affected. The Commission shall take a recorded vote on the request if one member desires that it do so. The Executive Director shall inform the requesting person of whether a vote was taken, and, if so, its outcome. Requests shall be addressed as follows: Sunshine Act Request, Office of the Executive Director, Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 520N, Washington, DC 20004-1710.

[44 FR 2575, Jan. 12, 1979, as amended at 67 FR 60862, Sept. 27, 2002; 77 FR 48430, Aug. 14, 2012]
# Official Journal C 196/3 Au

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 196 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 473 August 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 196

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 473 August 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 196/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 196/2 | Notice of initiation of a partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of cotton-type bedlinen originating in Pakistan | 2 |
| 2004/C 196/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3540 — CERBERUS/GDX) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 6 |
| 2004/C 196/4 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3467 — DOW CHEMICALS/PIC/WHITE SANDS JV) (1) | 7 |
| 2004/C 196/5 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3469 — PLATINUM/DYSTAR) (1) | 8 |
| 2004/C 196/6 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3373 — ACCOR/COLONY/DESSEIGNE-BARRIERE/JV) (1) | 8 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 196/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 196/2

Notice of initiation of a partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of cotton-type bedlinen originating in Pakistan

2

2004/C 196/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3540 — CERBERUS/GDX) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

6

2004/C 196/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3467 — DOW CHEMICALS/PIC/WHITE SANDS JV) (1)

7

2004/C 196/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3469 — PLATINUM/DYSTAR) (1)

8

2004/C 196/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3373 — ACCOR/COLONY/DESSEIGNE-BARRIERE/JV) (1)

8

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 196/7 | Call for proposals — DG EAC 42/04 — Support for the transnational distribution of European films — Support for international sales agents of European cinema films | 9 |
| 2004/C 196/8 | Call for applications for financial support to European consumer organisations | 10 |

III   Notices

Commission

2004/C 196/7

Call for proposals — DG EAC 42/04 — Support for the transnational distribution of European films — Support for international sales agents of European cinema films

9

2004/C 196/8

Call for applications for financial support to European consumer organisations

10

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2004/C 196/9 | Corrigendum to prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3529) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (OJ C 192, 28.7.2004) | 11 |

Corrigenda

2004/C 196/9

Corrigendum to prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3529) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (OJ C 192, 28.7.2004)

(OJ C 192, 28.7.2004)

11

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Augustus M. Powers, Appellant, *v.*Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Another.

Argued May 21, 1937;

decided June 8, 1937.

*609
      *Henry Kroll*and *Joseph Danziger*for appellant.

*Simon Greenhill, Joseph Greenhill*and *Bernard J. Freedman*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
§ 2570.168 Decision of the administrative law judge. For 502(c)(8) civil penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.57 of this title. ( a ) *Proposed findings of fact, conclusions, and order.* Within twenty (20) days of the filing of the transcript of the testimony, or such additional time as the administrative law judge may allow, each party may file with the administrative law judge, subject to the judge's discretion, proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order together with a supporting brief expressing the reasons for such proposals. Such proposals and briefs shall be served on all parties, and shall refer to all portions of the record and to all authorities relied upon in support of each proposal.
( b ) *Decision of the administrative law judge.* Within a reasonable time after the time allowed for the filing of the proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order, or within thirty (30) days after receipt of an agreement containing consent findings and order disposing of the disputed matter in whole, the administrative law judge shall make his or her decision. The decision of the administrative law judge shall include findings of fact and conclusions of law with reasons therefor upon each material issue of fact or law presented on the record. The decision of the administrative law judge shall be based upon the whole record. In a contested case in which the Department and the Respondent have presented their positions to the administrative law judge pursuant to the procedures for 502(c)(8) civil penalty proceedings as set forth in this subpart, the penalty (if any) which may be included in the decision of the administrative law judge shall be limited to the penalty expressly provided for in section 502(c)(8) of ERISA. It shall be supported by reliable and probative evidence. The decision of the administrative law judge shall become final agency action within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 704 unless an appeal is made pursuant to the procedures set forth in §§ 2570.169 through 2570.171 of this subpart.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET OF LILLY  INDUSTRIES,  INC. AT NOVEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE
CONSOLIDATED  CONDENSED  STATEMENT OF INCOME OF LILLY  INDUSTRIES,  INC. FOR THE
YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1,000
       
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                  NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                                           6,790
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   87,298
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     2,706
<INVENTORY>                                                     47,546
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               158,718
<PP&E>                                                         127,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  46,957
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 521,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          108,139
<BONDS>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                        90,836
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      31,053
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   521,860
<SALES>                                                        508,976
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               508,976
<CGS>                                                          321,748
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  461,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   638
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              14,466
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 34,138
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    15,362
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    18,776
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      .81
        


</TABLE>
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 12 May 2004

in Case T-191/01 André Hecq v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Officials - Social security - Article 72(1) of the Staff Regulations - Reimbursement of medical expenses - Serious illness - Refusal to reimburse certain medical services at 100 %)

(2004/C 190/25)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-191/01 André Hecq, an official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Mondercange (Luxembourg), represented by C. Mourato, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European Communities (Agent: J. Currall) – application for annulment of two decisions adopted by the office responsible for the settlement of claims on 13 October 2000 and 6 November 2000 respectively, refusing to reimburse at 100 % certain medical services provided for the applicant's wife – the Court of First Instance, composed of J. Azizi, President, and M. Jaeger and F. Dehousse, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 12 May 2004 the operative part of which is as follows:

----

(1)OJ C 317 of 10.11.2001.

----
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

	I, John B. Dicus, certify that:

	1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Capitol Federal Financial;

	2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or 			omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances 			under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this 			report; 

	3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this 			report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash 			flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

	4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining 			disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) 			for the registrant and have:

		a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and 				procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information 				relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by 				others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being 				prepared;

		b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and 				presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls 				and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such 					evaluation; and

		c)	disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over financial 				reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has 					materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal 				control over financial reporting; and

	5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation 			of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of 			registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

		a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal 				control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, 				process, summarize and report financial information; and

		b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who 				have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Date: February 4, 2005

By: /s/ John B. Dicus                                    

John B. Dicus, President and 

						Chief Executive Officer