alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  U.S. Board on Geographic Names 

#           Antarctic Names      

      By U.S. Board on Geographic Names

-  Home 
-  Membership 
-  Resources 
-  Domestic Names 
-  Foreign Names 
-  Antarctic Names 
-  Undersea Features 
-  Names Organizations 
-  Geographic Names FAQs 
-  Web Tools 

The Advisory Committee on Antarctic Names (ACAN) is charged with selecting commemorative names for recommendation to the U.S. Board on Geographic Names (BGN) for formal recognition by the United States.

### Quick Links

                        - Download Antarctic Names (*NEW*)
                        - BGN Antarctic Naming Policy
                        - Propose or Change an Antarctic Name
                        - U.S. Antarctica Naming Context and History
                        - GNIS Metadata
                        - Antarctica Text File Format (archived)

### Geographic Names Information System

Search Antarctica Names

The problem of geographic nomenclature in Antarctica differs from that of any land area of comparable size and is unique in the world. Antarctica has no indigenous population so there is no history of cultural ties to geography. Human presence has a relatively short history and is often temporary. The continent has been visited and explored by the representatives of many nations, who, by their heroic efforts to broaden man's knowledge of this land of ice and snow, have fully demonstrated the international nature of the world of science. Most major features of Antarctica have been discovered and mapped but a vast number of secondary features continue to be only partially delineated and remain unnamed. There is no sovereign territory and instead the region is managed under an international agreement, the Antarctic Treaty. The Advisory Committee on Antarctic names (ACAN) follows the Antarctica policy which guides ACAN in recommending names to the BGN for formal recognition by the United States. 

To propose a name in Antarctica, please read the Antarctica policy and submit information to BGNEXEC@usgs.gov.
#### KUHN v JACKMAN

Ohio Appeals, 3rd Dist, Allen Co

No 506.

Decided Feb. 19, 1929

Blank & Blank, Lima, for Kuhn.

Mackenzie & Weadock, Lima, for Jack-man.

*187HUGHES, J.

We entertain no doubt but that the trust deed is void and of no effect for two reasons, first because the use of the word heirs of the grantor to designate the parties as grantees of the remainder is ineffectual, See, 18 Corpus Juris, 159, and second, because of Section 8617 of the General Code of Ohio, hence we are back to the consideration of this case on the question of the performance under the deed given to the plaintiff.

The evidence makes it clear that while this deed to plaintiff was recorded, there was never any dominion exercised by her over the property; she did not collect nor demand rent from any one therefor; she did not make or pay for any repairs thereon; she did not pay the taxes charged against the property save and except on one occasion which was near the date of her father’s death.

It is true that her father made his home with her and ate at her table, but she accepted a regular and full compensation for his board, in money; his laundry was sent to the laundry; bills made out in his name and paid by him; his clothes were purchased and charged to him and paid by him. In short, the evidence makes it quite certain that there was no effort upon her part to perform the conditions imposed upon her by this deed. And therefore, unless it is made to appear that the performance of the conditions were waived by the grantor, a decree of cancellation should be decreed. See section 2108, Pomeroy’s Equity Jurisprudence, Second Edition.

The evidence shows that this grantor was practically blind and almost continually bed-ridden by physical infirmaties for the last four years of his life, and in view of his physical disabilities, which made it almost impossible for him to protest, it cannot be said that the evidence in this case would warrant a finding of waiver upon his part.

Judgment will be for the defendant. Each party to pay his own costs.

Before Judges Hughes, Justice- and Crow.
#### In the Matter of Village of Oriskany Falls et al., Respondents, v County of Oneida et al., Appellants.

[698 NYS2d 209]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Murad, J. (Appeal *862from Judgment of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Murad, J.— CPLR art 78.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Hurl-butt and Scudder, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(a)












                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
LaBarge, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
33-53583 and No. 33-31330 on Form S-8 of LaBarge, Inc. of our report dated
August 9, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of LaBarge, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of June 27, 1999 and June 28, 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows, and related
schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 27, 1999,
which report appears in the June 27, 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of
LaBarge, Inc.








KPMG LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
October 4, 1999


<PAGE>   2
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(a)













                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Managers
NotiCom L.L.C.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-53583 and 33-31330) on Form S-8 of LaBarge, Inc. of our report dated July 23,
1999 relating to the balance sheet of NotiCom L.L.C. as of June 27, 1999, and
the related statements of operations, members' equity, and cash flows for the
period from July 22, 1998 (inception) through June 27, 1999, which report
appears in the June 27, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K/A of LaBarge, Inc.



/s/ KPMG LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
October 4, 1999
Report to Congress on Wastes from the Combustion of Fossil Fuels

March 1999 3-17

sites. Compositing the concentrations of all compounds of interest using their respective 2,3,7,8-TCDD 

equivalency factors, the samples displayed 2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent concentrations from below

detection to 2.1 ng/kg (approximately one order of magnitude above typical detection limits). By

comparison, a reference sample of municipal waste incinerator fly ash had a 2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent

concentration of 1,460 ng/kg (parts per trillion) (EPRI, 1998b).

Coal contains and emits low levels of naturally occurring radiation (Radian, 1988). 

Concentrations of radionuclides in coal vary with coal rank and origin. For example, uranium and

thorium concentrations in U.S. coals range from below 0.01 parts per million (ppm) to roughly 75 ppm,

based on analyses of more than 6,000 samples (EPA, 1995c). However, the geometric mean

concentrations of uranium and thorium for the same sample population are 1.2 ppm and 2.2 ppm,

respectively. These concentrations correspond to activities of roughly 0.41 pCi/g and 0.24 pCi/g,

respectively. Because they do not volatilize, these elements generally concentrate in coal ash, such that

activity levels in the ash increase relative to the radioactivity in source coal (EPA, 1989a). EPA

estimates an average increase of roughly 10×, such that average activity levels for curanium and thorium

are 4 pCi/g and 2.4 pCi/g, respectively.

Constituent

Managed in Surface Impoundments Managed in Landfills

Mean Range Mean Range

Arsenic 40 6.7–150 20 6.2–38

Barium 1,600 150–8,400 2,900 1,800–3,800

Beryllium 8.4 0.88–16 n/a n/a

Boron 190 0.03–420 n/a n/a

Cadmium 6 0.20–24 n/a n/a

Chromium 85 5.7–290 50 35–78

Cobalt 29 4.7–42 n/a n/a

Copper 78 2.2–150 105 97–120

Lead 42 5–150 17 6.5–29

Manganese 280 55–660 460 200–820

Nickel 68 1.5–160 51 33–65

Selenium 37 0.025–320 14 0.8–32

Silver 5.2 0.03–14 n/a n/a

Thallium 27 10.6–48 n/a n/a

Strontium 1,040 1–4,800 2,100 1,100–2,650

Vanadium 120 20–350 86 23–160

Zinc 150 17–860 84 35

*All measurements identified as below detection limit were assigned a value equal to one-half the detection limit for use in the calculations. 

All concentrations are facility-averaged; i.e., multiple measurements from a single site are averaged, and the resulting population of facility

averages used to generate the statistics in this table.

n/a = data not available

Sources: EPRI, 1991, 1992, 1994a, 1994b, 1996a, 1996b, 1997c, 1997d, 1997e, 1997f, 1997g, 1997h, 1997i, 1997j, 1997k, and 1997l

Table 3-8. Facility Average Concentrations of Trace Constituents in Comanaged Wastes

(parts per million) (whole waste)*
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4685 

To prohibit assistance to foreign governments that violate human rights 

with respect to religious freedom. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2020 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To prohibit assistance to foreign governments that violate 

human rights with respect to religious freedom. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IDENTIFICATION OF COUNTRIES WITH LAWS 

4 IMPOSING SEVERE CRIMINAL PENALTIES 

5 FOR APOSTASY, BLASPHEMY, OR INTER6 FAITH. 

7 Not later than 120 days after the date of the enact8 ment of this Act, the President shall submit a report to 

9 the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 

10 the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of RepVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:18 Oct 10, 2020 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4685.IS S4685

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4685 IS

1 resentatives that lists each foreign government that the 

2 President determines, based on credible information, im3 poses a death sentence or life imprisonment on the basis 

4 of— 

5 (1) anti-apostasy laws that explicitly prohibit 

6 disaffiliation from a particular religion; 

7 (2) anti-blasphemy laws; or 

8 (3) laws prohibiting marriage between individ9 uals of different religious faiths. 

10 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ASSISTANCE TO FOREIGN GOV11 ERNMENTS THAT VIOLATE HUMAN RIGHTS 

12 WITH RESPECT TO RELIGION. 

13 The United States Government is prohibited from ob14 ligating or expending any Federal funds to provide assist15 ance to the government of any country identified in the 

16 report submitted by the President pursuant to section 1. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
§ 1471.335 What information must I provide before entering into a covered transaction with the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service? Before you enter into a covered transaction at the primary tier, you as the participant must notify the FMCS office that is entering into the transaction with you, if you know that you or any of the principals for that covered transaction: ( a ) Are presently excluded or disqualified;
( b ) Have been convicted within the preceding three years of any of the offenses listed in § 1471.800(a) or had a civil judgment rendered against you for one of those offenses within that time period;
( c ) Are presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses listed in § 1471.800(a); or
( d ) Have had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated within the preceding three years for cause or default.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 853 

To deauthorize the project for navigation, Northeast Harbor, Maine. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 13, 2007 

Ms. SNOWE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To deauthorize the project for navigation, Northeast Harbor, 

Maine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NORTHEAST HARBOR, MAINE. 

4 The project for navigation, Northeast Harbor, Maine, 

5 authorized by section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (59 

6 Stat. 12, chapter 19), is deauthorized as of the date of 

7 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Exhibit 10.19
 VECTOR GROUP LTD.
100 S.E. Second Street, 32nd Floor
Miami, Florida 33131




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 



Very truly yours,
VECTOR GROUP LTD.By:
    /s/ Howard M. LorberHoward M. LorberPresident and Chief Executive Officer AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:/s/ Richard J. LampenRichard J. Lampen




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 
  
 o
    
    my check in the amount of $ .
 o
    
    Shares having a total value of $ , such value
being based on the closing price(s) of the Shares on the date hereof.
  Number of Certificates
     and DenominationsNameAddressSocial Security No.
  Very truly yours,
Richard J. Lampen
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DEBRA K. ASHER

, Appellant,

v.

McCORMICK 105, LLC

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 2237

[ March 5, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Barry Stone

, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE

18002083

.

Debra K. Asher, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.

Evan R. Raymond of Howard Law Group, Boca Raton, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, C IKLIN and G ERBER

, JJ., concur

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 31.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to effectuate the provisions of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to the end that no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department of Labor.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1926

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.64 Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals.

For requirements regarding the process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals as it pertains to construction work, follow the requirements in 29 CFR 1910.119.

[84 FR 21576, May 14, 2019]
§ 2200.209 Hearing. ( a ) *Procedures.* As soon as practicable after the conclusion of the pre-hearing conference, the Judge will hold a hearing on any issue that remains in dispute. The hearing will be in accordance with subpart E of these rules, except for § 2200.73 which will not apply.
( b ) *Agreements.* At the beginning of the hearing, the Judge will enter into the record all agreements reached by the parties as well as defenses raised during the pre-hearing conference. The parties and the Judge then will attempt to resolve or narrow the remaining issues. The Judge will enter into the record any further agreements reached by the parties.
( c ) *Evidence.* Except as to matters that are protected by evidentiary privilege, the admission of evidence is not controlled by the Federal Rules of Evidence, but the Judge may accept a written stipulation of the parties that the Federal Rules of Evidence shall apply in whole or, as specified, in part. The Judge will receive oral, physical, or documentary evidence that is not irrelevant, unduly repetitious, or unreliable. Testimony will be given under oath or affirmation.
( d ) *Reporter.* A reporter will be present at the hearing. An official verbatim transcript of the hearing will be prepared and filed with the Judge. Parties may purchase copies of the transcript from the reporter.
( e ) *Oral and written argument.* Each party may present an oral argument at the close of the hearing. The Judge may allow or require post-hearing briefs or statements of position upon the request of either party or on the Judge's own motion. The form of any post-hearing briefs shall conform to § 2200.74 unless the Judge specifies otherwise.
( f ) *Judge's decision* — ( 1 ) *Bench decision.* The Judge may render a decision from the bench. In rendering a decision from the bench, the Judge shall state the issues in the case and make clear both the Judge's findings of fact and conclusions of law on the record. The Judge shall reduce the bench decision in the matter to writing and serve it on the parties as soon as practicable, but no later than 45 days after the hearing. If additional time is needed, approval of the Chief Administrative Law Judge is required. The decision shall be prepared in accordance with § 2200.90(a). The written decision shall include, as an appendix, the bench decision as set forth in the transcript.
( 2 ) *Written decision.* If the Judge does not render a decision from the bench, the Judge will issue a written decision within 60 days of the close of the record. The record will ordinarily be deemed closed upon the latter of the filing of the hearing transcript, or the completion of any permitted post-hearing briefing. The decision will be in accordance with § 2200.90(a). If additional time is needed, approval of the Chief Administrative Law Judge is required.
( g ) *Filing of Judge's decision with the Executive Secretary.* When the Judge issues a written decision, service, filing, and docketing of the Judge's written decision shall be in accordance with § 2200.90.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------

     We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Prospectuses
constituting  part  of  the  Registration  Statements  on  Form  S-3  and in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 listed below of Coyote Network Systems, Inc.,
formerly The Diana  Corporation,  of our report dated September 22, 1997, on the
financial  statements of The Diana Corporation included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.

1.   Registration Statement on Form S-3 
     (Registration No. 33-88392)

2.   Registration Statement on Form S-8
     (Registration No. 33-67188)

3.   Registration Statement on Form S-3
     (Registration No. 333-1055)

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California 
July 13, 1998
§ 1207.2 Requests for Mediation Board action. ( a ) Requests for the National Mediation Board to appoint neutrals or party representatives should be made on NMB Form 5.
( b ) Those authorized to sign request on behalf on parties: ( 1 ) The “representative of any craft or class of employees of a carrier,” as referred to in Public Law 89-456, making request for Mediation Board action, shall be either the General Chairman, Grand Lodge Officer (or corresponding officer of equivalent rank), or the Chief Executive of the representative involved. A request signed by a General Chairman or Grand Lodge Officer (or corresponding officer of equivalent rank) shall bear the approval of the Chief Executive of the employee representative.
( 2 ) The “carrier representative” making such a request for the Mediation Board's action shall be the highest carrier officer designated to handle matters arising under the Railway Labor Act.
( c ) Docketing of PL Board agreements: The National Mediation Board will docket agreements establishing PL Board, which agreements meet the requirements of coverage as specified in Public Law 89-456. No neutral will be appointed under § 1207.1(c) until the agreement establishing the PL Board has been docketed by the Mediation Board.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                       APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                 1,372,297
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                          1,415,356
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       2,950,092
<PP&E>                                 1,771,591
<DEPRECIATION>                          (301,276)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         4,420,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  1,842,849
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                 108,729
<OTHER-SE>                             2,468,829
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           4,420,407
<SALES>                                5,219,228
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       5,219,228
<CGS>                                  3,442,141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          3,442,141
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       3,796,006
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (2,018,919)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (2,018,919)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                          (2,018,919)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (0.20)



</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Military health system review.**
 
Review | Appendices
 
SuDoc Number:D 1.2:H 34/6
Item Number:0306 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000936061
 
April 2, 2018
----

----

I Comunicações

Comissão

----

Taxas de câmbio do euro (1)

7 de Julho de 2004

(2004/C 176/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Fonte: Taxas de câmbio de referência publicadas pelo Banco Central Europeu.

----

----

Notificação prévia de uma operação de concentração

(Processo n.o COMP/M.3402 — Siemens / 3i / AGUTH / XtraMind)

Processo susceptível de beneficiar do procedimento simplificado

(2004/C 176/02)

(Texto relevante para efeitos do EEE)

----

(1)JO L 395 de 30.12.1989, p. 1; versão rectificada: JO L 257 de 21.9.1990, p. 13.

(2)JO L 180 de 9.7.1997, p. 1; versão rectificada: JO L 40 de 13.2.1998, p. 17.

(3)JO C 217 de 29.7.2000, p. 32.

----

----

Comunicação da Comissão no âmbito da execução da Directiva 90/385/EEC do Conselho

(Texto relevante para efeitos do EEE)

Publicação dos títulos e referências das normas harmonizadas ao abrigo da directiva

Exemplo: Para a EN 60601-1:1990, aplica-se o seguinte:

----

(1)  CEN: rue de Stassart/De Stassartstraat 36, B - 1050 Brussels, tel: (32-2) 550 08 11, fax: (32-2) 550 08 19

CENELEC: rue de Stassart/De Stassartstraat 35, B - 1050 Brussels, tel: (32-2) 519 68 71, fax: (32-2) 519 69 19

ETSI: BP 152, F - 06561 Valbonne Cedex, tel: (33) 492 94 42 12, fax: (33) 493 65 47 16

----

----

Notificação prévia de uma concentração

(Processo n.o COMP/M.3508 — Doughty Hanson/Balta)

Processo susceptível de beneficiar do procedimento simplificado

(2004/C 176/04)

(Texto relevante para efeitos do EEE)

----

(1)JO L 24 de 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)JO C 217 de 29.7.2000, p. 32; o Regulamento (CEE) n.o 4064/89 do Conselho foi substituído pelo Regulamento (CE) n.o 139/2004 do Conselho.

----