alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31999R0087 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999R0087

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 87/1999 of 14 January 1999 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1722/93 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulations (EEC) No 1766/92 and (EEC) No 1418/76 concerning production refunds in the cereals and rice sectors respectively **

*
Official Journal L 009 , 15/01/1999 P. 0008 - 0013 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 87/1999 of 14 January 1999 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1722/93 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulations (EEC) No 1766/92 and (EEC) No 1418/76 concerning production refunds in the cereals and rice sectors respectively

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 923/96 (2), and in particular Article 7(3) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 of 22 December 1995 on the common organisation of the market in rice (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2072/98 (4), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas Annexes I and II to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1722/93 (5), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1011/98 (6), list the products for which starch attracting production refunds is used and the basic starches and/or their derivatives which can be used; whereas certain CN codes and the relevant descriptions in those Annexes no longer correspond to Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (7), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2261/98 (8);

Whereas the Annexes to Regulation (EEC) No 1722/93 should be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annexes I and II to Regulation (EEC) No 1722/93 are hereby replaced by the text in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 January 1999.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 181, 1. 7. 1992, p. 21.

(2) OJ L 126, 24. 5. 1996, p. 37.

(3) OJ L 329, 30. 12. 1995, p. 18.

(4) OJ L 265, 30. 9. 1998, p. 4.

(5) OJ L 159, 1. 7. 1993, p. 112.

(6) OJ L 145, 15. 5. 1998, p. 11.

(7) OJ L 256, 7. 9. 1987, p. 1.

(8) OJ L 292, 30. 10. 1998, p. 1.

ANNEX

'ANNEX I

>TABLE>

ANNEX II

>TABLE>

`
SUBSIDIARIES OF LCS INDUSTRIES, INC.


         Set forth below are the names of all subsidiaries of LCS as of December
1, 1998  required to be listed on Exhibit 22 to LCS's 1998 Annual Report on Form
10-K. Indented companies are direct subsidiaries of the company under which they
are indented.


                                    Percentage Owned by              State of
                                     Immediate Parent              Incorporation
                                     ----------------              -------------

LCS INDUSTRIES, INC.
    (Parent)                             N/A                          Delaware

    LCS Canada, Inc.                     100%                         Delaware

    LCS Industries, Ltd.                 100%                         Delaware

    Spec Holdings, Inc.                  100%                         New York

          The SpeciaLISTS Ltd.           100% - Class A               New York
                                          80% - Class B

          Computer Marketing
                 Systems, Inc.            51%                         New York

    Catalog Resources, Inc.              100%                         Delaware

    Catalog Liquidators, Inc.            100%                         Delaware
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS - Chief Financial Officer (interim)

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of China XinNetwork Media Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Tremis, interim- Chief FinancialOfficer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

|   | 1. | The      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: May 18, 2004

 

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| //s MICHAEL TREMIS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| MICHAEL TREMIS

Chairman,      President, CEO & interim CFO
 

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the smallbusiness issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request. |
#### LOGAN GAS CO v GLASGO

Ohio Supreme Court

No 22072.

Decided March 19, 1930

Marshall, CJ., Kinkade, Robinson, Jones and Allen, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                   ----------


           CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     Pursuant  to  18   U.S.C.ss.1350,   as  created  by  Sectionss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the  undersigned  officers of Equity One, Inc. (the
"Company"),  in its  capacity as general  partner of IRT Partners  L.P.,  hereby
certify, to such officers' knowledge, that:

          (i)  The  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the  period
               ended  September 30, 2003 (the "Report")  fully complies with the
               requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d),  as  applicable,  of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (ii) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of IRT Partners L.P.


          November 14, 2003             /s/  CHAIM KATZMAN
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Chaim Katzman
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        Equity One, Inc., general partner






          November 14, 2003             /s/  HOWARD M. SIPZNER
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Howard Sipzner
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        Equity One, Inc., general partner





A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to LP and will be retained by LP and  furnished to the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The  foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  as an  exhibit to the Report
pursuant  to  Item   601(b)(32)  of  Regulation  S-K  and  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  and,  accordingly,  is not  being  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  as  part of the  Report  and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of LP under the Securities Act of 1933
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of
the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing).
#### Brooms *v.*The State.

Violating Prohibition Law.

(Decided August 1, 1916.

Rehearing denied September 7, 1916.

72 South. 691.)

Criminal Law,‘ Election. — While under § 7151, Code 1907, different modes of violating the prohibition law may be charged in a single count of an indictment in the alterantive, yet where a single count of the indictment charged various violations of the prohibition laws in the alternative, a defendant may require an election upon the conclusion of the state’s evidence.

Appeal from Coffee Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. J. S. Williams.

(On application of the state this cause was reviewed by the Supreme Court, and was affirmed. See *Ex parte State in re. Brooms,*197 Ala. 419, 73 South. 35.)

Hugh Brooms was convicted of violating the prohibition law and he appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

*119Baldwin & Murphree, for appellant.

W. L. Martin, Attorney General, and Harwell G. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

PELHAM, P. J. —

The defendant was tried under an indictment containing but a single count, charging in the usual form that the defendant was guilty of a violation of the prohibition laws in having “sold, offered for sale, kept-for sale, or otherwise disposed of spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors.” But one conviction could have been had under the single count in the indictment charging different violations of prohibition laws in the alternative *(Moss v. State,*3 Ala. App. 189, 58 South. 62), and the trial court was in error in refusing and overruling the defendant’s motion, made at the conclusion of the introduction of the evidence, to require the state to elect under which alternative charge in the indictment it would proceed and ask for a conviction. If the indictment had charged the several offenses in separate counts, there would be no room for the contention that the state should be required to elect; and while the different offenses of this kindred nature may properly be joined, charging offenses of the same character in the alternative in-a single count (Code 1907, § 7151), the doctrine of election may nevertheless be invoked in behalf of the defendant by timely motion to require the state to put the defendant on notice as to which one of the several alternative charges it seeks a conviction under. The indictment covers any manner of disposition by which prohibited liquors may pass from one person to another unlawfully *(Arrington v. State,*13 Ala. App. 359, 69 South. 385, *Ex parte Arrington,*195 Ala. 694, 70 South. 1012) ; and the defendant had the right, upon motion duly made after the introduction of the state’s evidence, to be apprised with certainty of the particular crime he was called upon to meet and defend. The same question was 'gone into and fully discussed in the majority opinion of this court in the recent case of *Barefield.—See*Ba*refield v. State,*14 Ala. App. 638, 72 South. 293, and authorities there cited.

Other rulings of the court seem to be free from error. For the error in refusing the defendant’s motion to require the State to elect for which offense it would prosecute, the case must be reversed.

Reversed and remanded.
#### § 2200.3 Use of number.

Words importing the singular number may extend and be applied to the plural and vice versa.

[87 FR 8948, Feb. 17, 2022]
## **Exhibit 31.4**

##  

## Kentucky UtilitiesCompany

##  

I, S. Bradford Rives, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of KentuckyUtilities Company;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.

 

Date:  March 29, 2004

 
| /s/  S. Bradford Rives |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| S. Bradford Rives           |
| Chief Financial Officer     |

 

1

----
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jarrod Michael Taylor, Appellant

No. 06-17-00218-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 5th District Court of Cass 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2017F00162). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Jarrod Michael Taylor, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 31, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below. 

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 11, 2000. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Paul Kaboth, Banking Supervision), 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566: 

1. Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc., Monroeville, Pennsylvania; to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Three Rivers Bank and Trust Company, Monroeville, Pennsylvania. 

B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice President), 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034: 

                    1. Commonwealth Bancshares, Inc., Shelbyville, Kentucky; to merge with                     Start Printed Page 3240                    Commonwealth Financial Corporation, Louisville, Kentucky, and thereby indirectly acquire Commonwealth Bank & Trust Company, Middletown, Kentucky.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 13, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson,

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-1272 Filed 1-19-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CertificationPursuant to**

**18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**as AdoptedPursuant to**

**Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Lannett Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theyear ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Arthur P. Bedrosian, theChief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Keith R. Ruck, the VicePresident of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1.     |   | The  Report complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                             |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     |   | The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company. |

 

 
| Dated:  September 23, 2010 | /s/Arthur  P. Bedrosian                |
|---------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                            |                                   |
|                            | Arthur  P. Bedrosian,                  |
|                            | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|                            |                                   |
|                            |                                   |
| Dated:  September 23, 2010 | /s/Keith  R. Ruck                      |
|                            |                                   |
|                            | Keith  R. Ruck,                        |
|                            | Vice  President of Finance and         |
|                            | Chief  Financial Officer               |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Crdentia Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, James J. TerBeest, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to myknowledge:

 

1.                                       the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the datesand for the periods indicated.

 

This Certification has not been, and shallnot be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 
| Date: May 15, 2006 | By:                     | /s/ James J. TerBeest |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|                    | James J. TerBeest       |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----