alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                 ---------------------------------------------

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crdentia Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, James D. Durham, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code
that to the best of my knowledge:

        1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.


Date: November 14, 2003          By:  /s/ James D. Durham
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                          James D. Durham
                                          Chief Executive Officer
§ 2700.58 Interrogatories, requests for admissions and requests for production of documents. ( a ) *Interrogatories.* Any party, without leave of the Judge, may serve written interrogatories upon another party. A party served with interrogatories shall answer each interrogatory separately and fully in writing under oath within 25 days of service unless the proponent of the interrogatories agrees to a longer time. The Judge may order a shorter or longer time period for responding. A party objecting to an interrogatory shall state the basis for the objection in its answer.
( b ) *Requests for admissions.* Any party, without leave of the Judge, may serve on another party a written request for admissions. A party served with a request for admissions shall respond to each request separately and fully in writing within 25 days of service, unless the party making the request agrees to a longer time. The Judge may order a shorter or longer time period for responding. A party objecting to a request for admissions shall state the basis for the objection in its response. Any matter admitted under this rule is conclusively established for the purpose of the pending proceeding unless the Judge, on motion, permits withdrawal or amendment of the admission.
( c ) *Request for production, entry or inspection.* Any party, without leave of the Judge, may serve on another party a written request to produce and permit inspection, copying or photocopying of designated documents or objects, or to permit a party or his agent to enter upon designated property to inspect and gather information. A party served with such a request shall respond in writing within 25 days of service unless the party making the request agrees to a longer time. The Judge may order a shorter or longer period for responding. A party objecting to a request for production, entry or inspection shall state the basis for the objection in its response.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### General Services Administration

###### Technical Support Division

Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, as implemented by the Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), the General Services Administration (GSA) has filed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and made available to other government and interested private parties, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the construction of a U.S. Courthouse in the City of Springfield, Hampden County, Massachusetts.

The DEIS is on file at the Springfield City Hall, Clerk's Office, 36 Court Street; Springfield Public Library, Reference Desk, 220 State Street; and General Services Administration, 10 Causeway Street, Ninth Floor, Boston, Massachusetts.

Additional information may be obtained from the General Services Administration, Region 1, Attention: Frank Saviano, Project Manager, 10 Causeway Street, Room 975, Boston, MA 02222. Telephone 617-565-5494; FAX 617-565-5967.

Written comments regarding the DEIS may be submitted until July 6, 2000 and should be addressed to the General Services Administration in care of the above noted individual.

A public hearing is scheduled for June 13, 2000 in the Second Floor Meeting Room, Springfield City Hall, 36 Court Street, Springfield, Massachusetts. The hearing will begin at 4 p.m. and remain open until 7 p.m. or until all comments have been received.

Issued in Boston, Massachusetts on May 15, 2000.

George Klueber,

Portfolio Manager.

[FR Doc. 00-12924 Filed 5-22-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-23-M
#### O’NEILL v THOMAS

Ohio Supreme Court

No 22378,

Decided Nov 19, 1930

Marshall, CJ, Kinkade, Matthias and Allen, JJ, concur.
§ 2570.101 Procedures for review by the Secretary. ( a ) Upon receipt of the notice of appeal, the Secretary shall establish a briefing schedule which shall be served on all parties of record. Upon motion of one or more of the parties, the Secretary may, in his or her discretion, permit the submission of reply briefs.
( b ) The Secretary shall issue a decision as promptly as possible after receipt of the briefs of the parties. The Secretary may affirm, modify, or set aside, in whole or in part, the decision on appeal and shall issue a statement of reasons and bases for the action(s) taken. Such decision by the Secretary shall be final agency action within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 704.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                       1,628
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  722
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                  9,645
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            14,995
<PP&E>                                                       4,024
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 344
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             268,675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      282,897
<BONDS>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                     1,734
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 (15,956)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               268,675
<SALES>                                                      3,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             3,498
<CGS>                                                        1,355
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              217,853
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (210,006)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (210,006)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (210,006)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (.01)



</TABLE>
#### § 2571.1 Scope of rules.

The rules of practice set forth in this part apply to ex parte cease and desist order proceedings under section 521 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). The rules of procedure for administrative hearings published by the Department's Office of Administrative Law Judges at part 18 of this title will apply to matters arising under ERISA section 521 except as modified by this section. These proceedings shall be conducted as expeditiously as possible, and the parties and the Office of the Administrative Law Judges shall make every effort to avoid delay at each stage of the proceedings.
[No. 27738-7-II.

Division Two.

January 3, 2003.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Brian David Wiley, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kitsap County, No. 00-1-00576-6, Terry K. McCluskey, J., entered August 20, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, C.J., concurred in by Armstrong and QuinnBrintnall, JJ.
§ 2571.12 Procedures for review by the Secretary. ( a ) Upon receipt of a notice of appeal, the Secretary shall establish a briefing schedule which shall be served on all parties of record. Upon motion of one or more of the parties, the Secretary may, in her discretion, permit the submission of reply briefs.
( b ) The Secretary shall issue a decision as promptly as possible after receipt of the briefs of the parties. The Secretary may affirm, modify, or set aside, in whole or in part, the decision on appeal and shall issue a statement of reasons and bases for the action(s) taken. Such decision by the Secretary shall be the final agency action with the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 704.
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.951 Medical services and first aid. ( a ) *General.* The employer shall provide medical services and first aid as required in § 1926.50.
( b ) *First-aid training.* In addition to the requirements of § 1926.50, when employees are performing work on, or associated with, exposed lines or equipment energized at 50 volts or more, persons with first-aid training shall be available as follows: ( 1 ) *Field work.* For field work involving two or more employees at a work location, at least two trained persons shall be available.
( 2 ) *Fixed work locations.* For fixed work locations such as substations, the number of trained persons available shall be sufficient to ensure that each employee exposed to electric shock can be reached within 4 minutes by a trained person. However, where the existing number of employees is insufficient to meet this requirement (at a remote substation, for example), each employee at the work location shall be a trained employee.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

DATE: November 19, 2010

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Hino Representatives 

FROM: Houshun Zhang, Mechanical Engineer

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on Friday, November 19, 2010 between 

Seiichi Yamaguchi, Yoshihide Takenaka, Akira Harada, Chikako Sato, Richard Gezelle of 

HinoMotors, Ltd and Byron Bunker, Cleophas Jackson, Chien Sze, Soduk Lee, and Houshun 

Zhang of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The meeting mainly discussed HEV 

related certification on greenhouse gas regulation. Hino provided a detailed overview on 

hardware in the loop simulation (HILS) certification that could be potentially used in Japan. The 

meeting also discussed the possibility of evaluation of HILS at EPA if Hino would like to 

provide the procedure and guideline including a copy of software to EPA.
#### §§ 2205.171-2205.999 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                               9
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                       490
<INVENTORY>                                      3,499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,032
<PP&E>                                          33,242
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,736
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,560
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,550
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,316
<SALES>                                         74,798
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,798
<CGS>                                           57,715
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,429
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 169
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,811
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,561
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,561
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.44


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-14-00880-CV

Style: Theaola Robinson

v. KTRK Television, Inc.

Date motion filed*: August 25, 2015

Type of motion: Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellee’s Brief, or in the Alternative, 

Motion to Suspend Briefing Deadlines

Party filing motion: Appellee KTRK Television, Inc.

Document to be filed: Appellee’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: July 27, 2015

Number of previous extensions granted: 1 Current Due date: August 25, 2015

Date Requested: September 25, 2015

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted—Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellee’s Brief

If document is to be filed, document due: September 25, 2015

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances.

 Denied

 Dismissed—Motion to Suspend Briefing Deadlines

Appellee’s motion for an extension of time to file appellee’s brief is granted. Appellee’s brief is due to be filed no

later than September 25, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b), (c). Appellee’s motion to suspend briefing deadlines 

is dismissed as moot.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 

Date: September 3, 2015
#### Etta M. Gardner, Respondent, *v.*Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

(Argued October 8, 1936;

decided October 23, 1936.)

*Hamilton J. Hewitt*for appellant.

*Arthur F. Curtis*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
#### § 30.16 Reinstatement of program registration.

An apprenticeship program that has been deregistered pursuant to this part may be reinstated by the Registration Agency upon presentation of adequate evidence that the apprenticeship program is operating in accordance with this part.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 99 (Monday, May 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 32131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12828]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Experimental & Integrative Activities; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Experimental & Integrative 
Activities (1193).
    Date/Time: June 29, 2000, 8 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Place: Room 120, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Anthony Maddox, CISE Educational Innovation, 
Experimental and Integrative Activities, Room 1160, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, VA 22230, Telephone: (703) 306-
1981.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the National Science Foundation 
for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate CISE Educational Innovation 
proposals submitted in response to the program announcement (NSF 00-
33).
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 17, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-12828 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### § 1986.113 Judicial enforcement.

Whenever any person has failed to comply with a preliminary order of reinstatement or a final order, including one approving a settlement agreement issued under SPA, the Secretary may file a civil action seeking enforcement of the order in the United States district court for the district in which the violation was found to have occurred.
----

Information procedure — Technical rules

(2004/C 203/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services (OJ L 204, 21.7.1998, p. 37; OJ L 217, 5.8.1998, p. 18).

Notifications of draft national technical rules received by the Commission

The Commission draws attention to the judgment delivered on 30 April 1996 in the 'CIA Security' case (C-194/94, ECR I-2201), in which the Court of Justice ruled that Articles 8 and 9 of Directive 98/34/EC (formerly 83/189/EEC) are to be interpreted as meaning that individuals may rely on them before national courts which must decline to apply a national technical regulation which has not been notified in accordance with the Directive.

This judgment confirms the Commission's communication of 1 October 1986 (OJ C 245, 1.10.1986, p. 4).

Accordingly, breach of the obligation to notify renders the technical regulations concerned inapplicable, and consequently unenforceable against individuals.

For more information on the notification procedure, please write to:

Also consult the website: http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/tris/

If you require any further information on these notifications, please contact the national departments listed below:

List of national departments responsible for the management of Directive 98/34/EC

BELGIUM

CZECH REPUBLIC

DENMARK

GERMANY

ESTONIA

GREECE

SPAIN

FRANCE

IRELAND

ITALY

CYPRUS

LATVIA

LITHUANIA

LUXEMBOURG

HUNGARY

MALTA

NETHERLANDS

AUSTRIA

POLAND

PORTUGAL

SLOVENIA

SLOVAKIA

FINLAND

SWEDEN

UNITED KINGDOM

EFTA - ESA

TURKEY

----

(1)  Year — registration number — Member State of origin.

(2)  Period during which the draft may not be adopted.

(3)  No standstill period since the Commission accepts the grounds of urgent adoption invoked by the notifying Member State.

(4)  No standstill period since the measure concerns technical specifications or other requirements or rules on services linked to fiscal or financial measures, pursuant to the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 1(11) of Directive 98/34/EC.

(5)  Information procedure closed.

----
§ 1917.41 House falls. ( a ) Span beams shall be secured to prevent accidental dislodgement.
( b ) A safe means of access shall be provided for employees working with house fall blocks.
( c ) Designated employees shall inspect chains, links, shackles, swivels, blocks and other loose gear used in house fall operations before each day's use. Defective gear shall not be used.
Dear Mr

. Emerich

- Honauer :

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing fro m your petition (Docket No. FAA−2015

− 3849 )

. This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make (s) , model (s) , and type(s)(i.e. , fixed

- wing, rotorcraft, lighter

- than

- air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description (s) should include the maximum weight ( including payload)

. This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).
Please submit the additional information (non

- proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov

. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information ), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e

- mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 12/2/15 . I f we do not receive the information , we will close the dock et without notifying you further. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

- 4549

. Sincerely, /S/ Michael J. Cameron Program Analyst