alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 913 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 913

      To clarify that the revocation of an alien's visa or other 
            documentation is not subject to judicial review.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 19, 2007

 Mr. Grassley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To clarify that the revocation of an alien's visa or other 
            documentation is not subject to judicial review.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF VISA REVOCATION.

    Section 221(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1201(i)) is amended by striking ``There shall be no means of judicial 
review'' and all that follows and inserting the following: 
``Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including section 2241 of 
title 28, United States Code, any other habeas corpus provision, and 
sections 1361 and 1651 of such title, a revocation under this 
subsection may not be reviewed by any court, and no court shall have 
jurisdiction to hear any claim arising from, or any challenge to, such 
a revocation.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall--
            (1) take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act; 
        and
            (2) apply to all visas issued before, on, or after such 
        date.
                                 <all>
```
§ 2200.68 Recusal of the Judge. ( a ) *Discretionary recusal.* A Judge may recuse themself from a proceeding whenever the Judge deems it appropriate.
( b ) *Mandatory recusal.* A Judge shall recuse themself under circumstances that would require disqualification of a Federal judge under Canon 3(C) of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, except that the required recusal may be set aside under the conditions specified by Canon 3(D).
( c ) *Request for recusal.* Any party may request that the Judge, at any time following the Judge's designation and before the filing of a decision, be recused under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section or both by filing with the Judge, promptly upon the discovery of the alleged facts, an affidavit setting forth in detail the matters alleged to constitute grounds for recusal.
( d ) *Ruling on request.* If the Judge finds that a request for recusal has been filed with due diligence and that the material filed in support of the request establishes that recusal either is appropriate under paragraph (a) of this section or is required under paragraph (b) of this section, the Judge shall recuse themself from the proceeding. If the Judge denies a request for recusal, the Judge shall issue a ruling on the record, stating the grounds for denying the request, and shall proceed with the hearing, or, if the hearing has closed, proceed with the issuance of a decision under the provisions of § 2200.90.
[84 FR 14558, Apr. 10, 2019, as amended at 87 FR 8949, Feb. 17, 2022]
640 A.2d 1085

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. Leonard Peter BOROTKA.

Misc. Docket (subtitle BV) No. 4,

Sept. Term 1994.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

May 6, 1994.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Placement on Inactive Status submitted to this Court by Petitioner and Respondent, it is this 6th day of May, 1994

ORDERED by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Joint Petition be, and it is hereby, granted and Leonard Peter Borotka is immediately placed on inactive status subject to further order of this Court, and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Leonard Peter Borotka from the register of attorneys in this Court until further order of this Court and shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State in accordance with Rule BV13.
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Serena Software, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2007 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, Robert I. Pender, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Serena Software, Inc. certify that, to my knowledge:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Serena Software, Inc. at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    ROBERT I. PENDER,
JR.Robert I. Pender, Jr. Senior Vice President, Finance And Administration, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial And Accounting Officer)


Date: September 14, 2007

This Certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### LOPA v SMITH

Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Lorain Co

No 520.

Decided April 30, 1930

,Anderson & Lamb, Cleveland, for Lopa.

Robert H. Rice, Elyria, for Smith,

Opinion by

WASHBURN, J.

FUNK and PARDEE, JJ., concur.
PUBLIC LAW 115–226—AUG. 1, 2018 132 STAT. 1625 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2245: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

June 28, considered and passed Senate. 

July 23, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–226 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To include New Zealand in the list of foreign states whose nationals are eligible 

for admission into the United States as E–1 and E–2 nonimmigrants if United 

States nationals are treated similarly by the Government of New Zealand. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Knowledgeable Innovators and 

Worthy Investors Act’’ or the ‘‘KIWI Act’’. 

SEC. 2. NONIMMIGRANT TRADERS AND INVESTORS. 

For purposes of clauses (i) and (ii) of section 101(a)(15)(E) 

of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)), 

New Zealand shall be considered to be a foreign state described 

in such section if the Government of New Zealand provides similar 

nonimmigrant status to nationals of the United States. 

Approved August 1, 2018. 

8 USC 1101 note. 

Knowledgeable 

Innovators and 

Worthy Investors 

Act. 

8 USC 1101 note. 

Aug. 1, 2018 

[S. 2245] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
§ 37.110 What enforcement procedures does the Department follow to effect compliance with the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIA and this part? ( a ) *Sanctions; judicial enforcement.* If compliance has not been achieved after issuance of a Final Determination under §§ 37.99 and 37.100, or a Notification of Breach of Conciliation Agreement under §§ 37.102 through 37.105, the Secretary may: ( 1 ) After opportunity for a hearing, suspend, terminate, deny or discontinue the WIA Title I financial assistance, in whole or in part;
( 2 ) Refer the matter to the Attorney General with a recommendation that an appropriate civil action be instituted; or
( 3 ) Take such action as may be provided by law.
( b ) *Deferral of new grants.* When proceedings under § 37.111 have been initiated against a particular recipient, the Department may defer action on that recipient's applications for new WIA Title I financial assistance until a Final Decision under § 37.112 has been rendered. Deferral is not appropriate when WIA Title I financial assistance is due and payable under a previously approved application. ( 1 ) New WIA Title I financial assistance includes all assistance for which an application or approval, including renewal or continuation of existing activities, or authorization of new activities, is required during the deferral period.
( 2 ) New WIA Title I financial assistance does not include assistance approved before the beginning of proceedings under § 37.111, or increases in funding as a result of changed computations of formula awards.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12409]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than June 9, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Phillip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. The PrivateBancorp, Inc., Chicago, Illinois; to acquire The 
PrivateBank (a federal savings bank in organization), St. Louis, 
Missouri, and thereby operate a nonbank depository institution (a 
federal savings bank) pursuant to Section 4(c)(8) of the BHC Act and 
section 225.28(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 11, 2000.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-12409 Filed 5-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit
32.1


STATEMENT
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Charles S. Conoley, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements
      included in such Report.





/s/Charles
S. Conoley


President
and Chief Executive Officer


August
20, 2010
COYOTE NETWORK SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

     All   significant   subsidiaries   of  the  Registrant  have  been  listed.
Indentations indicate indirectly owned subsidiaries which are owned by the named
subsidiary.

                                                               State of
Subsidiaries of the Registrant                              Incorporation
------------------------------                              -------------
Coyote Communications Services, LLC                           Colorado
Coyote Gateway, LLC                                           Colorado
Coyote Technologies, Inc.                                     Nevada
     Coyote Technologies, LLC                                 California
INET Interactive Network System, Inc.                         California
Entree Corporation                                            Delaware
     Atlanta Provision Company, Inc.                          Georgia
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lite King Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


Date: March 15, 2006                   By:     /s/ David L. Norris
                                               -------------------------------
                                       Name:   David L. Norris
                                       Title:  President and
                                               Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lite King Corporation
and will be retained by Lite King Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                 EXHIBIT 32.1-1
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 872 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the excise tax 

provisions and income tax credit for biodiesel. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2007 

Mrs. LINCOLN (for herself and Mr. COLEMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the excise tax provisions and income tax credit for biodiesel. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXCISE TAX PROVISIONS AND 

4 INCOME TAX CREDIT FOR BIODIESEL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Sections 40A(g), 6426(c)(6), and 

6 6427(e)(5)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 are 

7 each amended by striking ‘‘2008’’ and inserting ‘‘2017’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•S 872 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

3 of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
§ 1918.41 Coaming clearances. ( a ) *Weather decks.* If a deck load (such as lumber or other smooth sided deck cargo) more than five feet (1.52 m) high is stowed within three feet (.91 m) of the hatch coaming and employees handling hatch beams and hatch covers are not protected by a coaming at least 24-inch (.61 m) high, a taut handline shall be provided along the side of the deckload. The requirements of § 1918.35 are not intended to apply in this situation.
( b ) *Intermediate decks.* ( 1 ) There shall be a three-foot (.91 m) working space between the stowed cargo and the coaming at both sides and at one end of the hatches with athwartship hatch beams, and at both ends of those hatches with fore and aft hatch beams, before intermediate deck hatch covers and hatch beams are removed or replaced. Exception: The three-foot (.91 m) clearance is not required on the covered portion of a partially open hatch, nor is it required when lower decks have been filled to hatch beam height with cargo of such a nature as to provide a safe surface upon which employees may work.
( 2 ) For purposes of paragraph (b)(1) of this section, fitted gratings that are in good condition shall be considered a part of the decking when properly placed within the three-foot (.91 m) area.
( c ) Grab rails or taut handlines shall be provided for the protection of employees handling hatch beams and hatch covers, when bulkheads, lockers, reefer compartments or large spare parts are within three feet (.91 m) of the coaming.
( d ) The clearances in this section do not apply to hatches opened or closed solely by hydraulic or other mechanical means; except that, in all cases in which the three-foot (.91 m) clearance does not exist, cargo that is stowed within three feet (.91 m) of the edge of the hatch shall be adequately secured to prevent cargo from falling into the hold.
[62 FR 40202, July 25, 1997, as amended at 65 FR 40944, June 30, 2000]
§ 1620.34 Rules to be liberally construed. ( a ) These rules and regulations shall be liberally construed to effectuate the purpose and provisions of this Act and any other Act administered by the Commission.
( b ) Any person claiming to be aggrieved or the agent for such person may advise the Commission of the statute or statutes under which he or she wishes the Commission to commence its inquiry.
( c ) Whenever the Commission is investigating a charge or allegation relating to a possible violation of one of the statutes which it administers and finds a violation of one or more of the other statutes which it administers, the Commission may seek to remedy such violation in accordance with the procedures of all relevant statutes.
[46 FR 4888, Jan. 19, 1981. Redesignated at 51 FR 29819, Aug. 20, 1986]
Home »

GHG Reporting Instructions » Preparing Your Annual GHG Reporting » Subpart Reporting Instructions » Subpart A - General Provisions »

... » Using e-GGRT to Prepare Your Subpart A Report » Subpart A U.S. Parent Companies » Standardization of Parent Company Names - Style Guide


## Standardization of Parent Company Names - Style Guide

Reporters are required to enter the "Legal Name of Unit ed States Parent Company." EPA has defined U.S. parent company(s) as highest-level U.S. company(s) with an ownership interest in the reporting entity as of December 31 of the year for which data are being reporte d. Please select you facility's parent company from the pick-list provided. A screen snap of the parent company page is shown below: To improve the quality and utility of GHG data EPA has established guidelines for standardizing corporate parent names. As a first step EPA has established a pick list of existing corp orate parents. The following 4 steps were taken standardize the names of on the pick list including: 1) Names were standardized and research was conducted to v erify the name submitted was the highest-level of the company in the U.S. 2) For GHG reporters who also report to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI), standardized names were sourced from the TRI parent company database. 3) For the sectors covered by the GHG reporting program only, parent companies were derived from internet research. 4) The List of Parent Companies with local government agenci es (e.g., city, town, county government) was removed.A list of the parent company names provided on this pick list can also be downloaded using this link

.

If your facility's parent company is not already on the parent company pick-list you will need to ente r the parent company's name in e-GGRT. The following provides a "style guide" for parent company naming:

Remember to:

• Eliminate all periods

• Enter & instead of AND

• Use "North America" instead of NA When reporting the Parent Company, use the terms di splayed in the "Acronym" column of the table below:



### Acronym Definition

CORP CorporationASSOC Association

CO Company

DIV Division

INC Incorp/Incorp./Incorporated

LP Limited Partnership

LTD Limited

LLC Limited Liability Company

PTNR Partnership

USA United States of America

US United States
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.1207 Training. ( a ) The employer must provide training to each employee whose work is regulated by this standard, at no cost to the employee, and ensure that the employee possesses the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under this standard. This training must result in an understanding of the hazards in the permit space and the methods used to isolate, control or in other ways protect employees from these hazards, and for those employees not authorized to perform entry rescues, in the dangers of attempting such rescues.
( b ) Training required by this section must be provided to each affected employee: ( 1 ) In both a language and vocabulary that the employee can understand;
( 2 ) Before the employee is first assigned duties under this standard;
( 3 ) Before there is a change in assigned duties;
( 4 ) Whenever there is a change in permit space entry operations that presents a hazard about which an employee has not previously been trained; and
( 5 ) Whenever there is any evidence of a deviation from the permit space entry procedures required by § 1926.1204(c) or there are inadequacies in the employee's knowledge or use of these procedures.
( c ) The training must establish employee proficiency in the duties required by this standard and must introduce new or revised procedures, as necessary, for compliance with this standard.
( d ) The employer must maintain training records to show that the training required by paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section has been accomplished. The training records must contain each employee's name, the name of the trainers, and the dates of training. The documentation must be available for inspection by employees and their authorized representatives, for the period of time the employee is employed by that employer.