alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lite King Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31,, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: March 1, 2006                    By:
                                                -----------------------
                                       Name:    David L. Norris
                                       Title:   Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lite King Corporation
and will be retained by Lite King Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.432 Environmental deterioration of equipment. ( a ) *Deteriorating agents.* ( 1 ) Unless identified for use in the operating environment, no conductors or equipment shall be located: ( i ) In damp or wet locations;
( ii ) Where exposed to gases, fumes, vapors, liquids, or other agents having a deteriorating effect on the conductors or equipment; or
( iii ) Where exposed to excessive temperatures.
( 2 ) Control equipment, utilization equipment, and busways approved for use in dry locations only shall be protected against damage from the weather during building construction.
( b ) *Protection against corrosion.* Metal raceways, cable armor, boxes, cable sheathing, cabinets, elbows, couplings, fittings, supports, and support hardware shall be of materials appropriate for the environment in which they are to be installed.
§ 4002.4 Place of meetings; use of conference call communications equipment. ( a ) *Place of meetings.* Meetings of the Board of Directors will be held at the principal office of the Corporation or the Department of Labor unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors or the Chair.
( b ) *Teleconference.* Any Member may participate in a meeting of the Board of Directors through the use of conference call telephone or similar communications equipment, by means of which all persons participating in the meeting can speak to and hear each other. Any Board Member so participating in a meeting will be deemed present for all purposes. Actions taken by the Board of Directors at meetings conducted through the use of such equipment, including the votes of each Member, must be recorded in the minutes of the meetings of the Board of Directors.
EXHIBIT 99.4


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Infowave  Software  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  June 30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I George
Reznik, Chief Financial Officer and member of the Office of the President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The report fully complies with the  requirements  of the Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  represents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




                                        /s/ George Reznik
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        George Reznik
                                        Chief Financial Officer, Office of the
                                        President
                                        August 14, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 100 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 100

Authorizing the last surviving United States veteran of the First World 
   War to lie in honor in the rotunda of the Capitol upon his death.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 22 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

   Mr. Byrd submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the last surviving United States veteran of the First World 
   War to lie in honor in the rotunda of the Capitol upon his death.

Whereas the veterans of the First World War fought bravely and made heroic 
        sacrifices for the Allied forces;
Whereas the veterans of the First World War suffered the terrors of both trench 
        warfare and the chemical battlefield;
Whereas the veterans of the First World War suffered the scourge of the Spanish 
        influenza pandemic;
Whereas past resolutions have sought authorization for veterans, representative 
        of specific wars, to lie in honor in the rotunda of the Capitol;
Whereas it is the desire of all veterans to honor both those who serve and those 
        who have served in time of war and peace;
Whereas it is the Nation's collective desire to express its gratitude for the 
        sacrifice and service of all First World War veterans; and
Whereas Frank Woodruff Buckles, born February 1, 1901, in Bethany, Missouri, and 
        residing in Jefferson County, West Virginia, at age 107, is believed to 
        be the last surviving United States veteran of the First World War: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. HONORING VETERANS OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR.

    (a) In General.--In recognition of the historic contributions of 
United States veterans who served in the First World War, the last 
surviving United States veteran of the First World War shall be 
permitted to lie in honor in the rotunda of the Capitol upon his death, 
so that the citizens of the United States may pay their last respects 
to these great Americans.
    (b) Implementation.--The Architect of the Capitol, under the 
direction and supervision of the President pro tempore of the Senate 
and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, shall take the 
necessary steps to implement subsection (a), including, if necessary, 
scheduling the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the purposes 
described in such subsection at such a time as such use will not 
coincide with the use of the Capitol for an Inauguration or a State of 
the Union address.
                                 <all>
```
# Den Europæiske Unions C 184A/17.

| | ISSN 1725-2393 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 184A |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 47. årgang17. juli 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2393

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 184A

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

47. årgang17. juli 2004

---

| Informationsnummer | Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Oplysninger |
| | Rådet |
| 2004/C 184A/1 | | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Indhold

Side

III   Oplysninger

Rådet

2004/C 184A/1

1

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

III Oplysninger

Rådet

| 17.7.2004 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CA 184/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2004

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CA 184/1

---

STILLINGSOPSLAG

(Ref. A/014)

GENERALDIREKTØR

(2004/C 184 A/01)

Generalsekretariatet for Rådet ønsker at besætte en stilling som generaldirektør for Generaldirektorat H — Retlige og indre anliggender.

Yderligere oplysninger (på engelsk og fransk) samt ansøgningsskema kan fås ved at kontakte Udvælgelses- og Ansættelseskontoret på følgende e-mail–adresse: service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int eller via dets websted: http://ue.eu.int/concours.

Ansøgningsfrist: den 3. september 2004, idet poststemplet er afgørende.

---
§ 10.22 Rate of pay. ( a ) *General.* The contractor must pay each worker performing work on or in connection with a covered contract no less than the applicable Executive Order minimum wage for all hours worked on or in connection with the covered contract, unless such worker is exempt under § 10.4 of this part. In determining whether a worker is performing within the scope of a covered contract, all workers who, on or after the date of award, are engaged in working on or in connection with the contract, either in performing the specific services called for by its terms or in performing other duties necessary to the performance of the contract, are thus subject to the Executive Order and this part unless a specific exemption is applicable. Nothing in the Executive Order or these regulations shall excuse noncompliance with any applicable Federal or State prevailing wage law or any applicable law or municipal ordinance establishing a minimum wage higher than the minimum wage established under Executive Order 13658.
( b ) *Workers who receive fringe benefits.* The contractor may not discharge any part of its minimum wage obligation under the Executive Order by furnishing fringe benefits or, with respect to workers whose wages are governed by the Service Contract Act, the cash equivalent thereof.
( c ) *Tipped employees.* The contractor may satisfy the wage payment obligation to a tipped employee under the Executive Order through a combination of an hourly cash wage and a credit based on tips received by such employee pursuant to the provisions in § 10.28.
#### § 4003.21 Form and contents of initial determinations.

All initial determinations to which this subpart applies will be in writing, will state the reason for the determination, and, except when effective on the date of issuance as provided in § 4003.22(b), will contain notice of the right to request review of the initial determination pursuant to subpart C or D of this part, as applicable, and a brief description of the procedures for requesting review.

[61 FR 34012, July 1, 1996, as amended at 85 FR 10283, 10284, Feb. 24, 2020]
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3472 — RELIANCE/TREVIRA)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2004/C 188/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 217, 29.7.2000, p. 32; Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 has been replaced by Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

----
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women's Work in the War

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Women's Work in the War : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 193*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										July 1942,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5466,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
§ 36.435 Employment assistance to students. ( a ) *Assistance by recipient in making available outside employment.* A recipient that assists any agency, organization, or person in making employment available to any of its students: ( 1 ) Shall assure itself that such employment is made available without discrimination on the basis of sex; and
( 2 ) Shall not render such services to any agency, organization, or person that discriminates on the basis of sex in its employment practices.
( b ) *Employment of students by recipients.* A recipient that employs any of its students shall not do so in a manner that violates §§ 36.500 through 36.550.
§ 2550.407d-5 Definition of the term “qualifying employer security”. ( a ) *In general.* For purposes of this section and section 407(d)(5) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act), the term “qualifying employer security” means an employer security which is: ( 1 ) Stock; or
( 2 ) A marketable obligation, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section and section 407(e) of the Act.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a)(2) of this section and section 407(d)(5) of the Act, the term “marketable obligation” means a bond, debenture, note, or certificate, or other evidence of indebtedness (hereinafter in this paragraph referred to as “obligation”) if: ( 1 ) Such obligation is acquired— ( i ) On the market, either— ( A ) At the price of the obligation prevailing on a national securities exchange which is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or
( B ) If the obligation is not traded on such a national securities exchange, at a price not less favorable to the plan than the offering price for the obligation as established by current bid and asked prices quoted by persons independent of the issuer;
( ii ) From an underwriter, at a price— ( A ) Not in excess of the public offering price for the obligation as set forth in a prospectus or offering circular filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and
( B ) At which a substantial portion of the same issue is acquired by persons independent of the issuer; or
( iii ) Directly from the issuer at a price not less favorable to the plan than the price paid currently for a substantial portion of the same issue by persons independent of the issuer;
( 2 ) Immediately following acquisition of such obligation, ( i ) Not more than 25 percent of the aggregate amount of obligations issued in such issue and outstanding at the time of acquisition is held by the plan, and
( ii ) At least 50 percent of the aggregate amount referred to in paragraph (A) is held by persons independent of the issuer; and
( 3 ) Immediately following acquisition of the obligation, not more than 25 percent of the assets of the plan is invested in obligations of the employer or an affiliate of the employer.
[42 FR 44388, Sept. 2, 1977]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           $ 909
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      524
<ALLOWANCES>                                        54
<INVENTORY>                                        117
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,661
<PP&E>                                           1,416
<DEPRECIATION>                                     813
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,966
<BONDS>                                          1,358
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                          16
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,992
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,947
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (631)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (473)   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (158)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   2,008
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (940)
<NET-INCOME>                                       909
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 SRMOF 2009-1 TRUST,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. 31,786

5 GURUNEIL SINGH KHALSA GOODMAN, 

6 JAGAT KHALSA, OCCUPANTS, WHOSE 

7 TRUE NAMES ARE UNKNOWN, if any, 

8 THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF GURUNEIL 

9 SINGH KHALSA GOODMAN A/K/A 

10 GURUNEIL SINGH KHALSA GOODMAN, 

11 if any, and THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF 

12 JAGAT KHALSA, if any,

13 Defendants-Appellants.

14 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY

15 Sarah M. Singleton, District Judge

16 Castle Stawiarski, LLC

17 Elizabeth Mason

18 Michael Neil

19 Albuquerque, NM

20 for Appellee

21 Guruneil Singh Khalsa Goodman

22 Santa Cruz, NM

23 Jagar Khalsa

24 Espanola, NM
2

1 Mukhtiar S. Khalsa

2 Santa Cruz, NM

3 Pro Se Appellants

4 MEMORANDUM OPINION

5 VIGIL, Judge.

6 Guruneil Singh Khalsa Goodman (Guruneil), Jagat Khalsa (Jagat), and

7 Mukhtiar S. Khalsa (Mukhtiar), have appealed from the denial of their motion to set

8 aside a default judgment in the underlying foreclosure action. We filed a notice of

9 proposed summary disposition on March 29, 2012. As to Jagat, we proposed to affirm

10 the default judgment; as to Guruneil, we proposed to reverse the default judgment; and

11 as to Mukhtiar, we proposed that he was not a proper party to the appeal. On April

12 20, 2012, Guruneil and Mukhtiar filed a memorandum in support of the proposed

13 summary disposition. No memorandum in opposition has been filed, and the time for

14 doing so has long since passed.

15 Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the notice of proposed summary

16 disposition, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

17 IT IS SO ORDERED.

18 _______________________________

19 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
3

1 WE CONCUR:

2 _________________________________

3 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

4 _________________________________

5 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
#### MILES ex parte

Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist, Hamilton Co

No 3639.

Decided Jan 13, 1930

Robert Fosdick, Cincinnati, for Miles.

Nelson Schwab, Prosecuting Attorney and H. L. Britton, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Cincinnati, for State.

CUSHING, PJ.

The sections of the general code involved are 13,710 and 13,711.

Thus it will be seen that the law gives the court the right to fix the time of probation. That was done in this case by the court fixing the time of one year. It further provides that during the probationary period, he may be brought'before the court. That was not done in this case. The record discloses that five days after the termination of the probationary period, as fixed by the court, the court did make a second order of probation of one year.

The law as heretofore quoted provides at the end or termination of the period of probation, the jurisdiction of the court or magistrate to impose sentence shall cease, and the defendant shall thereupon be discharged.

Clearly under the facts here, the jurisdiction of the court to impose sentence ceased at the expiration of the first year’s probation, and the defendant not being brought in during the period of probation, the court lost jurisdiction to impose sentence under the statute.

If anything is claimed for the second probationary period, the situation would be the same, since he was not brought in during the second probationary period, but ten months thereafter.

In the case of In Re Application of Nunley, 102 Ohio St., 332, these sections of the statute were considered by the Supreme Court of Ohio. In the course of the memorandum opinion the court said:

“the jurisdiction of the court, upon suspending the sentence, is continuing during the time limit of the suspension, and not exceeding two years; x x x x and that if he violates his parole, while under suspension, the coprt, by the provisions of this enactment, has ample power to terminate the suspension and impose sentence x x x ”

Quoting further from the opinion

> “A court may pronounce sentence, when? ■At any time during the period of suspeiv sion as previously fixed by the court; but" in no case, of course, exceeding two years.”

Applying the facts of the ease under consideration to the code sections referred to, together with the construction of the Supreme Court of Ohio, the petitioner is clearly entitled to his discharge, as the court was without jurisdiction to impose the sentence that it did.

An entry may be presented discharging the petitioner from custody.

Hamilton, J, and Ross, J, concur.