LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

1 Docket Index Table of Contents A. U.S. EPA Guidance Documents, Policies, and Rulemaki ngs ............................................... .......... 1 B. State Plans, Rules, Support Documents, Reports, and Correspondence ................................... ...... 7 C. Additional Documents for Proposed Rulemaking ......

................................................... ............... 12 D. Notices of Proposed Rulemaking and Technical Suppor t Documents ....................................... .. 22 E. Public Comments and Related Documents .............

................................................... ................... 23 F. Additional Documents Considered for Final Rulemakin g.................................................. .......... 23 G. Notice of Final Rulemaking and Technical Support Do cument ............................................ ....... 23

A. U.S. EPA Guidance Documents, Policies, and Rulemaki ngs

A-1 State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for th e Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990; General preamble for fu ture proposed rulemakings. 57 Fed. Reg. 13498 (April 16, 1992). A-2 State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for th e Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990; Supplemental; General p reamble for future proposed rulemakings; Appendices. 57 Fed. Reg. 18070 (April 28, 1992). A-3 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California State Implementation Plan Revision; San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Final rule. 59 Fed. Reg. 2535 (January 18, 1994). A-4 State Implementation Plans for Serious PM-10 Nonatt ainment Areas, and Attainment Date Waivers for PM-10 Nonattainment Areas Generally; Ad dendum to the General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990; Addendum to the General Preamble for future proposed rulemakings. 5 9 Fed. Reg. 41998 (August 16, 1994). A-5 Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation P lan; Indiana; Direct final rule. 62 Fed. Reg. 15844 (April 3, 1997). A-6 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particul ate Matter; Final rule. 62 Fed. Reg. 38652 (July 18, 1997). A-7 Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation P lan; Illinois; Final rule. 62 Fed. Reg. 66279 (December 18, 1997). A-8 “Residential Wood Combustion Technology Review, Vol ume 1. Technical Report,” December 1998. A-9 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California State Implementation Plan Revision, Six California Air Pollution Control Dist ricts; Direct finale rule. 64 Fed. Reg. 26876 (May 18, 1999). A-10 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Arizona – Maricopa County PM–10 Nonattainment Area; Serious Area Plan for Attainmen t of the Annual PM–10 Standard; Proposed rule. 65 Fed. Reg. 19964 (April 13, 2000).LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

2 A-11 “Improving Air Quality with Economic Incentive Prog rams,” January 2001. Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; C onnecticut; One-Hour Ozone Attainment Demonstration and Attainment Date Extens ion for the Greater Connecticut Ozone Nonattainment Area; Final rule. 66 Fed. Reg. 634 (January 3, 2001). A-12 Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementa tion Plans; District of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia; Post 1996 Rate-of-Progress Plan s, One- Hour Ozone Attainment Demonstrations and Attainment Date Extension for th e Metropolitan Washington D.C. Ozone Nonattainment Area; Final rule. 66 Fed Reg. 5 86 (January 3, 2001). A-13 Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementa tion Plans; Rhode Island; Post-1996 Rate of Progress Plan; Direct final rule. 66 Fed. R eg. 30811 (June 8, 2001). A-14 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Arizona – Maricopa County PM–10 Nonattainment Area; Serious Area Plan for Attainmen t of the 24-Hour PM–10 Standard and Contingency Measures; Proposed rule. 66 Fed. Reg. 5 0252 (October 2, 2001). A-15 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Arizona – Maricopa Nonattainment Area; PM–10; Final rule. 66 Fed. Reg. 51869 (Octobe r 11, 2001). A-16 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Arizona – Maricopa County PM–10 Nonattainment Area; Serious Area Plan for Attainmen t of the PM–10 Standards; Final rule. 67 Fed. Reg. 48718 (July 25, 2002). A-17 Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in Progress, Attain ment, and Maintenance State Implementation Plans for Ozone, Carbon Monoxide, an d Nitrogen Dioxide; California; Final rule. 67 Fed. Reg. 69141 (November 15, 2002). A-18 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, Imperial County Air Pollution Control District; Direct final rule. 68 Fed. Reg. 8839 (Feb ruary 26, 2003). A-19 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans f or California – San Joaquin Valley PM–10 Nonattainment Area; Serious Area Plan for Att ainment of the 24-Hour and Annual PM–10 Standards; Proposed rule. 69 Fed. Reg. 5412 ( February 4, 2004). A-20 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans f or California – San Joaquin Valley PM–10 Nonattainment Area; Serious Area Plan for Att ainment of the 24-Hour and Annual PM–10 Standards; Final rule. 69 Fed. Reg. 30006 (Ma y 26, 2004). A-21 “Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter (Volum e I of II),” October 2004. A-22 “Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter (Volum e II of II),” October 2004. A-23 Air Quality Designations and Classifications for th e Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) National Ambient Air Quality Standards; Final rule. 70 Fed. Reg. 944 (January 5, 2005). A-24 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District and Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District; 70 Fed. Reg. 46770 (August 11, 2005). A-25 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Proposed rule. 70 Fed. Reg. 51303 (August 30, 2005).LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

3 A-26 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an; San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Final rule. 71 Fed. Reg . 7683 (February 14, 2006). A-27 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Final rule. 71 Fed. Reg . 8461 (February 17, 2006). A-28 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particul ate Matter; Final rule. 71 Fed. Reg. 61144 (October 17, 2006). A-29 “Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses f or Demonstrating Attainment of Air Quality Goals for Ozone, PM 2.5 , and Regional Haze,” April 2007. A-30 Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule; Final rule. 72 Fed. Reg. 20586 (April 25, 2007). A-31 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Direct final rule. 72 F ed. Reg. 29886 (May 30, 2007). A-32 Memorandum, dated July 23, 2007, from Tyler J. Fox, Air Quality Modeling Group, to EPA docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0062, Subject: Details on Technical Assessment to Develop Interpollutant Trading Ratios for PM 2.5 Offsets. A-33 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District and Sacramento Metropolitan Air Qu ality Management District; Direct final rule. 73 Fed. Reg. 1819 (January 10, 2008). A-34 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; State of California; PM–10; Revi sion of Designation; Redesignation of the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin PM–10 Nonattainmen t Area to Attainment; Approval of PM–10 Maintenance Plan for the San Joaquin Valley A ir Basin; Approval of Commitments for the East Kern PM–10 Nonattainment Area; Final r ule. 73 Fed. Reg. 66759 (November 12, 2008). A-35 California State Motor Vehicle Pollution Control St andards; Notice of Decision Granting a Waiver of Clean Air Act Preemption for California’s 2009 and Subsequent Model Year Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards for New Motor Veh icles; Notice. 74 Fed. Reg. 32744 (July 8, 2009). A-36 Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementa tion Plans; California; Proposed rule. 74 Fed. Reg. 33196 (July 8, 2009). A-37 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Final rule. 74 Fed. Reg . 53888 (October 21, 2009). A-38 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District and South Coast Air Qual ity Management District; Final rule. 74 Fed. Reg. 57907 (November 10, 2009). A-39 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Final rule. 75 Fed. Reg . 1715 (January 13, 2010). A-40 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District; Final rule. 75 Fed. Reg. 10690 (M arch 9, 2010).LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

4 A-41 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an; Proposed rule. 75 Fed. Reg. 68294 (November 5, 2010). A-42 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of California; 2008 San Joaquin Valley State Implementation Plan for Fine Particula te Matter; 2007 State Strategy; PM 2.5 ; Proposed rule. 75 Fed. Reg. 74518 (November 30, 201 0). A-43 Official Release of the January 2011 AP-42 Method f or Estimating Re-Entrained Road Dust from Paved Roads; Announcement of Availability. 76 Fed. Reg. 6328 (February 4, 2011). A-44 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Final rule. 76 Fed. Reg . 16696 (March 25, 2011). A-45 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Final rule. 76 Fed. Reg . 26609 (May 9, 2011). A-46 Memorandum from Tyler Fox, Leader, Air Quality Mode ling Group, C439-01, EPA to Regional Air Program Managers, EPA, “Update to the 24 Hour PM 2.5 NAAQS Modeled Attainment Test,” June 28, 2011. A-47 EPA Region 9 Technical Support Document for the Rev ised Proposed Rulemaking Action on the San Joaquin Valley 2008 PM 2.5 Plan and the San Joaquin Valley Portions of the Re vised 2007 State Strategy, June 29, 2011. A-48 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California; 2008 San Joaquin Valley PM 2.5 Plan and 2007 State Strategy; Proposed rule. 76 F ed. Reg. 41338 (July 13, 2011). A-49 Memorandum from Gina McCarthy, Assistant Administra tor, EPA to Regional Air Division Directors, Regions 1-10, EPA, “Revised Policy to Ad dress Reconsideration of Interpollutant Trading Provisions for Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ),” July 21, 2011. A-50 EPA Region 9 Technical Support Document and Respons es to Comments: Final Rule on the San Joaquin Valley 2008 PM 2.5 State Implementation Plan, September 30, 2011. A-51 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Final rule. 76 Fed. Reg . 68106 (November 3, 2011). A-52 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Final rule. 76 Fed. Reg . 68103 (November 3, 2011). A-53 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California; 2008 San Joaquin Valley PM 2.5 Plan and 2007 State Strategy; Final rule. 76 Fed. Reg. 69896 (November 9, 2011). A-54 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD); Final rule. 77 Fed. Reg. 214 (January 4, 2012). A-55 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Final rule. 77 Fed. Reg . 2228 (January 17, 2012). A-56 Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Calif ornia; San Joaquin Valley; Attainment Plan for 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standards; Final rule. 7 7 Fed. Reg. 12652 (March 1, 2012). A-57 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California Air Resources Board—InUse Heavy-Duty Diesel-Fueled Truck and Bus Regulati on, and Drayage Truck Regulation; Final rule. 77 Fed. Reg. 20308 (April 4, 2012).LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

5 A-58 Memorandum from Tim Hanley, Office of Air Quality P lanning and Standards, EPA to Met One BAM Users, “RE: Zero Tests on the Met One BAM 1 020,” October 5, 2012. A-59 Revisions to the California State Implementation P lan, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Final rule. 77 Fed. Reg . 66548 (November 6, 2012). A-60 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, San Joaquin Valley United Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) and South Coa st Air Quality Management District (AQMD); Final rule. 77 Fed. Reg. 71129 (November 29 , 2012). A-61 EPA Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Revisi ons to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter, EPA-452/R -12-005 (December 2012). A-62 California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control S tandards; In-Use Portable Diesel Engines 50 Horsepower and Greater; Notice of Decisi on. 77 Fed. Reg. 72846 (December 6, 2012). A-63 California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control S tandards; Portable Equipment Registration Program; Notice of Decision. 77 Fed. R eg. 72851 (December 6, 2012). A-64 California State Motor Vehicle Pollution Control St andards; Notice of Decision Granting a Waiver of Clean Air Act Preemption for California’s Advanced Clean Car Program and a Within the Scope Confirmation for California’s Zero Emission Vehicle Amendments for 2017 and Earlier Model Years. 78 Fed. Reg. 2112 (Ja nuary 9, 2013). A-65 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particul ate Matter; Final rule. 78 Fed. Reg. 3086 (January 15, 2013). A-66 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, San Joaquin Valley United Air Pollution Control District; Final rule. 78 Fed. Re g. 6740 (January 31, 2013). A-67 EPA Strategies for Reducing Residential Wood Smoke, EPA-456/B-13-001, March 2013. A-68 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, Imperial County Air Pollution Control District; Final rule. 78 Fed. Reg. 23677 (April 22, 2013). A-69 Memorandum from Stephen D. Page, Director, Office o f Air Quality Planning and Standards, EPA, to Regional Air Directors, Regions I-X, “Inter im Guidance to Implement Requirements for the Treatment of Air Quality Monitoring Data In fluenced by Exceptional Events,” May 10, 2013. A-70 EPA Draft Emissions Inventory Guidance for Implemen tation of Ozone [and Particulate Matter] National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAA QS) and Regional Haze Regulations, April 11, 2014. A-71 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California; San Joaquin Valley; Contingency Measures for the 1997 PM 2.5 Standards; Final rule. 79 Fed. Reg. 29327 (May 22, 2014). A-72 Identification of Nonattainment Classification and Deadlines for Submission of State Implementation Plan (SIP) Provisions for the 1997 F ine Particle (PM 2.5 ) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) and 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS; Final rule. 79 Fed. Reg. 31566 (June 2, 2014).LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

6 A-73 Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing S tationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units; Proposed rule. 79 Fed. Reg. 3483 0 (June 18, 2014). A-74 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans, State of California, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, New Source Review; Final rule. 79 Fed. Reg. 55637 (September 17, 2014). A-75 EPA Region 9 Technical Support Document: Proposed A ction on the San Joaquin Valley 2012 PM 2.5 State Implementation Plan and 2014 Supplemental Do cument and Proposed Reclassification of the San Joaquin Valley as Serio us Nonattainment for the 2006 PM 2.5 Standard, December 2014. A-76 Memorandum from Richard Wayland, Division Director, Air Quality Assessment Division to Regional Air Division Directors, Regions 1-10, “Dra ft Modeling Guidance for Demonstrating Attainment of Air Quality Goals for O zone, PM 2.5 , and Regional Haze,” December 3, 2014. A-77 Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purpo ses; California; San Joaquin Valley; Reclassification as Serious Nonattainment for the 1 997 PM 2.5 Standards; Proposed rule. 80 Fed. Reg. 1482 (January 12, 2015). A-78 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Direct final rule. 80 F ed. Reg. 7803 (February 12, 2015). A-79 Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Qualit y Standards: State Implementation Plan Requirements; Proposed rule. 80 Fed. Reg. 15340 (Ma rch 23, 2015). A-80 Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purpo ses; California; San Joaquin Valley; Reclassification as Serious Nonattainment for the 1 997 PM 2.5 Standards; Final rule. 80 Fed. Reg. 18528 (April 7, 2015). A-81 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an; San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Quantification of Emiss ion Reductions From Incentive Programs; Final rule. 80 Fed. Reg. 19020 (April 9, 2015). A-82 EPA Region 9 Technical Support Document for EPA’s P roposed Rulemaking for the California State Implementation Plan (SIP): San Joa quin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District Rule 4901: Wood Burning Fireplaces and Wood Burning Heaters, August 2015, with enclosure:

a. Attachment 1: Major Components of Various Residenti al Wood Burning Rules. A-83 Withdrawal of Approval and Disapproval of Air Quali ty Implementation Plans; California; San Joaquin Valley; Contingency Measures for the 19 97 PM 2.5 Standards; Proposed rule. 80 Fed. Reg. 49190 (August 17, 2015). A-84 Revision to the California State Implementation Pla n; San Joaquin Valley; Demonstration of Creditable Emission Reductions from Economic Incent ive Programs; Proposed rule. 80 Fed. Reg. 51147 (August 24, 2015). A-85 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California; San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Employer Based Trip Reduction Programs; Proposed rule. 80 Fed. Reg. 51153 (August 24, 2015).LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

7 A-86 SIP Submissions Currently under EPA Adequacy Review : San Joaquin Valley, CA, PM 2.5 attainment plan for the 1997 standard (PM 2.5 and NO x budgets 2014, 2017, 2018, and 2020), September 18, 2015. A-87 Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, San Joaq uin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Proposed rule. 80 Fed. Reg. 58637 (Septem ber 30, 2015). A-88 Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, San Joaq uin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District and South Coast Air Quality Management Dis trict; Proposed rule. 80 Fed. Reg. 68484 (November 5, 2015). A-89 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California; California Mobile Source Regulations; Proposed rule. 80 Fed. Reg. 69915 (Nov ember 12, 2015). A-90 Revisions to the California State Implementation Pl an, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Proposed rule. 80 Fed. Reg. 75442 (December 2, 2015). A-91 Official Release of EMFAC2014 Motor Vehicle Emissio n Factor Model for Use in the State of California; Notice of availability. 80 Fed. Reg. 77337 (December 14, 2015). A-92 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California; San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Employer Based Trip Reduction Programs; Final rule. 81 Fed. Reg. 6761 (February 9, 2016).

a. Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California; San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Employer Ba sed Trip Reduction Programs; Final rule. Pre-publication version (December 11, 2015).

B. State Plans, Rules, Support Documents, Reports, and Correspondence

B-1. CARB, “The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, Approved Revision 2005,” Release date January 6, 2006, with Appendices B and C. B-2. Tulare County Association of Governments, Resolutio n No. 1705, “In the Matter of Amending Policy for Programming Congestion, Mitigat ion and Air Quality (CMAQ) Funds,” April 16, 2007, with Exhibit A (Local Cost- Effectiveness CMAQ Policy). B-3. Kings County Association of Governments, “CMAQ Cost -Effectiveness Threshold Documentation for the Kings County Association of G overnments 2011 FTIP,” with Resolution 07-03, May 23, 2007, and Exhibit A (Loca l Cost-Effectiveness CMAQ Policy). B-4. Merced County Association of Governments, Resolutio n No. 2007/05-17-05, “Resolution Adopting the Local Cost-Effectiveness Congestion Mi tigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Policy,” May 17, 2007, with Exhibit A (Local Cost-E ffectiveness CMAQ Policy). B-5. Madera County Transportation Commission, Resolution 07-09, “Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Program,” May 23, 2007, with Exhibit A (Loc al Cost-Effectiveness CMAQ Policy). B-6. Council of Fresno County Governments, Resolution No . 2007-17, “Resolution Adopting the Local Cost-Effectiveness Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Policy,” May 31, 2007, with Exhibit A (Local Cost-Effectiveness CMAQ Policy).LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

8 B-7. Stanislaus Council of Governments, “CMAQ Cost-Effec tiveness Threshold Documentation for the Stanislaus Council of Governments 2011 FTIP ,” with Resolution 06-54, June 13, 2007, and Exhibit A (Local Cost-Effectiveness CMAQ Policy). B-8. San Joaquin Council of Governments, Resolution R-08 -03, “Resolution to Adopt the Local Cost-Effectiveness Congestion Mitigation and Air Qu ality (CMAQ) Program Policy,” July 26, 2007, with Exhibit A (Local Cost-Effectiveness CMAQ Policy). B-9. Kern Council of Governments, “CMAQ Policy, Local Co st-Effectiveness,” Adopted September 2007, with Resolution No. 07-28, Septembe r 20, 2007, and Exhibit A (Local Cost-Effectiveness CMAQ Policy). B-10. CARB, “Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Redu ction Program, Final Guidelines for Implementation,” Adopted February 28, 2008. B-11. CARB, “The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, Approved Revision 2008,” Release date April 22, 2008, with Appendices B and C. B-12. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, “Final Staff Repor t, Amendments to Rule 4692 (Commercial Charbroiling),” October 8, 2009, with e nclosure:

a. “Appendix C, Compliance Costs and Cost Effectivenes s Analysis for Revised Proposed Amendments to Rule 4692,” October 8, 2009. B-13. CARB, “Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Redu ction Program, Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation,” March 2010. B-14. Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District, “2010 PM 10 Maintenance Plan and Redesignation Request for the Coso Junction Plannin g Area,” May 17, 2010. B-15. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management Dist rict, “PM 10 Implementation Plan and Redesignation Request for Sacramento County,” Octob er 28, 2010. B-16. CARB, “Progress Report on Implementation of PM 2.5 State Implementation Plans (SIP) for the South Coast and San Joaquin Valley Air Basins a nd Proposed SIP Revisions,” Submitted May 18, 2011 (Release date March 29, 2011 and adopt ed April 28, 2011), with enclosures:

a. Letter, James N. Goldstene, Executive Officer, CARB , to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region 9, U.S. EPA, May 18, 2011. b. “Precursor Effectiveness, Draft” May 13, 2011. B-17. CARB, “The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, Approved Revisions 2011,” Release date June 6, 2011 (Approved by the Board, April 28, 2011), wi th Appendices C and D. B-18. California Air Resources Board (CARB), “Final regul ation order to reduce emissions of diesel particulate matter, oxides of nitrogen, and other pollutants from in-use heavy-duty diesel-fueled vehicles,” Effective December 14, 201 1; California Code of Regulations, title 13, article 4.5, chapter 1, section 2025. B-19. CARB, “Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Redu ction Program, Final Guidelines for Implementation,” January 2013. B-20. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, “2012 PM 2.5 Plan,” Submitted March 4, 2013 (Adopted December 20, 2012), with enclosures:LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

9 a. Letter, James N. Goldstene, Executive Officer, CARB , to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region 9, U.S. EPA, March 4, 2013. b. CARB, “Staff Report, Proposed Revision to the PM 2.5 State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the San Joaquin Valley,” Release date January 1 1, 2013 (adopted January 24, 2013).

c. Note: Chapter 5 (Control Strategy), Appendix D (Sta tionary and Area Source Control Strategy Evaluation), and Appendix G (PM 2.5 Weight of Evidence) of the 2012 PM 2.5 Plan are posted as separate files for ease of downl oad. B-21. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, “Annual Air Monito ring Network Plan,” June 25, 2013, with Appendices A thru H and transmittal letter:

a. Letter, Samir Sheikh, Director of Strategies and In centives, San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, to Matt Lakin, Manager, Manager, Air Quality Analysis Office, U.S. EPA, June 25, 2013. B-22. Letter, Meredith Kurpius, Manager, Air Quality Anal ysis Office, U.S. EPA, to Samir Sheikh, Director of Strategies and Incentives, San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, re: San Joaquin Valley APCD 2013 Annual Air Monitoring Network Plan , May 8, 2014. B-23. Fresno Council of Governments (COG), “Conformity An alysis for the 2015 Federal Transportation Improvement Program and 2014 Regiona l Transportation Plan,” June 26, 2014. B-24. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, “Final Staff Repor t for Amendments to the District’s Residential Wood Burning Program,” September 18, 20 14, with U.S. EPA completeness letter:

a. Letter, Deborah Jordan, Director, Air Division, Reg ion 9, U.S. EPA, to Richard W. Corey, Executive Officer, CARB, re: completeness re view of CARB’s November 6, 2014 submittal of several local air district rules, incl uding San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Rule 4901, December 18, 2014. B-25. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District ( APCD), “Burn Cleaner, Voucher Application – Phase 1,” December 2014. B-26. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, “Burn Cleaner, Vou cher Guidelines,” December 2014. B-27. Fresno COG, “2015 Federal Transportation Improvemen t Program,” 2015. B-28. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, “Final Staff Repor t, Amendments to Rule 4905 (Natural Gas-fired, Fan-type Central Furnaces),” January 22, 2015, with CARB transmittal letter:

a. Letter, Richard W. Corey, Executive Officer, CARB, to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region 9, U.S. EPA, re: SIP rule rev isions for four local air districts, including San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Rule 4905 , April 7, 2015. B-29. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, “2014 Annual Air M onitoring Network Plan,” January 28, 2015, with enclosures. B-30. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, “Notice of Public Workshop, Draft 2015 Plan for the 1997 PM 2.5 Standard,” March 2, 2015.LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

10 B-31. Email, Stephen Zelinka, Manager, Emissions Inventor y Development Section, CARB, to Rory Mays, Air Planning Office, Region 9, U.S. EPA, re: San Joaquin Valley PM 2.5 emissions inventory, June 8, 2015, with enclosures:

a. CARB, “Appendix A – Burn Events for San Joaquin Val ley, 2012.” b. CARB, “Appendix B – List of Emission Factors by Cro p Type.”

c. CARB, “2012 PM 2.5 Emission Estimates from Managed Burning and Dispos al for the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin,” June 8, 2015. B-32. Letter, Meredith Kurpius, Manager, Air Quality Anal ysis Office, U.S. EPA, to Sheraz Gill, Director of Strategies and Incentives, San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, re: San Joaquin Valley APCD 2014 Annual Air Monitoring Network Plan , June 16, 2015. B-33. Governing Board, San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, “ Action Summary Minutes,” June 18, 2015. B-34. Email, Sheraz Gill, Director of Strategies and Ince ntives, San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, to Andrew Steckel, Manager, Air Rules Office, Regio n 9, U.S. EPA, re: Requested information, June 25, 2015, with enclosures:

a. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, “Feasibility Consi derations: AO Spark-Ignited Engines.” b. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, “Evaluation of Pot ential Ammonia Reductions from Covering Manure Storage Ponds & Manure Storage Pile s in the San Joaquin Valley.”

c. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, “Registration of C ertified Wood Burning Devices.” B-35. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, “2015 Plan for the 1997 PM 2.5 Standard,” submitted June 25, 2015, with enclosures:

a. Letter, Richard W. Corey, Executive Officer, CARB, to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region 9, U.S. EPA, June 25, 2015. b. CARB, “Staff Report, ARB Review of San Joaquin Vall ey PM 2.5 State Implementation Plan,” Release date April 20, 2015 (adopted May 21, 2015).

c. CARB, “Technical Clarifications to the 2015 San Joa quin Valley PM 2.5 State Implementation Plan.” d. CARB, Resolution 15-9, “San Joaquin Valley PM 2.5 State Implementation Plan,” May 21, 2015.

e. CARB, Hearing transcript, Board Meeting, May 21, 20 15. f. CARB, “Notice of Public Meeting to Consider Approva l of the San Joaquin Valley PM 2.5 State Implementation Plan,” April 20, 2015. g. Letter, Sheraz Gill, Director of Strategies and Inc entives, San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, to Richard Corey, Executive Officer, CARB, Ma y 12, 2015, transmitting the 2015 Plan for the 1997 PM 2.5 Standard. h. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, “California Air Re sources Board, SIP Completeness Checklist.”LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

11 i. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Resolution 15-4-7A , “In the Matter of: Adopting the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control Di strict 2015 Plan for the 1997 PM 2.5 Standard,” April 16, 2015. j. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Resolution 15-4-7B , “In the Matter of: Use of AB 2522 DMV Fees to Meet Federal Clean Air Act Mandate s,” April 16, 2015. k. Memo, Seyed Sadredin, Executive Director/APCD, San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, to San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Governing Board, “Re: Item Number 7: Adopt 2015 Plan for the 1997 PM 2.5 Standard, Including request to extend attainment d eadline; Approve associated commitments to continue to leave no stone unturned in assessing future amendments to the district rules that may pr ovide additional feasible reductions; Approve commitments to achieve further reductions i n particulate emissions and its precursors through incentive-based strategies to re place heavy duty trucks and residential wood burning devices; Approve Resolution 15-4-7B to amend resolution 10-10-14 to continue necessary AB 2522 DMV funding for incentiv e-based commitments in the plan to reduce mobile source emissions,” April 16, 2015. l. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Evidence of public notice of April 16, 2015 Governing Board hearing through various San Joaquin Valley newspapers, March 6, 2015. B-36. Letter, Karen Magliano, Chief, Air Quality Planning and Science Division, to Kerry Drake, Associate Director, Region 9, U.S. EPA, re: Technic al error with PM 2.5 design value calculations, August 12, 2015, with enclosures:

a. CARB, “Attachment A – Revised San Joaquin Valley PM 2.5 Design Values.” b. CARB, “Attachment B – Attainment of Annual PM 2.5 Standard by 2020 at Madera City Monitoring Site.” B-37. CARB, “Transportation Conformity Budgets for the Sa n Joaquin Valley PM 2.5 SIP Plan Supplement,” Submitted August 13, 2015 (Release dat e June 19, 2015), with enclosures:

a. Letter, Richard W. Corey, Executive Officer, CARB, to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region 9, U.S. EPA, August 13, 2015. b. CARB, Resolution 15-39, “Transportation Conformity Budgets for the San Joaquin Valley PM 2.5 State Implementation Plan,” July 23, 2015.

c. CARB, “Board Meeting Comments Log.” d. CARB, “Notice of Public Meeting to Consider Approva l of Transportation Conformity Budgets for the San Joaquin Valley PM 2.5 State Implementation Plan,” June 19, 2015.

e. CARB, “Completeness Checklist for Submission of Tra nsportation Conformity Budgets for the San Joaquin Valley PM 2.5 SIP Plan Supplement.” B-38. Letter, Richard W. Corey, Executive Office, CARB, t o Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region 9, U.S. Environmental Protect ion Agency (EPA), re: Regulations covered by Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 209 waivers and authorizations, August 14, 2015.LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

12 B-39. Memo to file, Scott Bohning, Air Quality Analysis O ffice, Region 9, U.S. EPA, “RE: Call with California Air Resources Board regarding lette r about reversal of elemental and organic carbon,” September 18, 2015. B-40. Memo to file, Rory Mays, Air Planning Office, Regio n 9, U.S. EPA, “Re: Call with California Air Resources Board regarding VOC and am monia emissions inventory,” September 30, 2015. B-41. U.S. EPA, “List of ARB Supplemental Modeling-relate d files for 2015 SJV PM2.5 Plan,” October 2, 2015, for the following documents:

a. CARB, Bakersfield-California Detailed Future Design Value Estimation, April 20, 2015. b. CARB, Python script to scaled RRFs, February 13, 20 15.

c. CARB, Bakersfield - California Street 24-Hour Futur e Design Value Estimation, April 20, 2015. d. CARB, Bakersfield - Planz 24-Hour Future Design Val ue Estimation, April 20, 2015.

e. CARB, Bakersfield - Planz 24-Hour Annual Design Val ue Estimation, April 20, 2015. f. CARB, Madera 24-Hour Future Design Value Estimation , April 20, 2015. g. CARB, Madera Annual DV Future Design Value Estimati on, April 20, 2015 B-42. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, “Draft Further Stu dy, Warm Mix Asphalt,” December 1, 2015. B-43. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, “Draft Further Stu dy, Rule 4311 Flare Minimization Plans 2015,” December 3, 2015. B-44. Letter, Richard W. Corey, Executive Office, CARB, t o Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region 9, U.S. EPA, re: Quantitative milestone element of the San Joaquin Valley 2015 Plan for the 1997 PM 2.5 Standard, December 15, 2015.

C. Additional Documents for Proposed Rulemaking

C-1. Asphalt/Concrete Operations.

a. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Rule 4301, Fuel Bur ning Equipment, amended December 17, 1992. b. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Rule 4631, Cutback, Slow Cure and Emulsified Asphalt, Paving and Maintenance Operations, amended December 17, 1992.

c. Texas Transportation Institute, “A Synthesis of War m-Mix Asphalt,” October 2007. d. Modified Asphalt Research Center, University of Wis consin - Madison, “Sustainable Asphalt Pavements: Technologies, Knowledge Gaps, an d Opportunities,” February 20, 2009.

e. Adam J.T. Hand, PhD, PE, Nevada T 2 Center, “Green Pavement Construction,” April 23, 2009.LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

13 f. Bob Frank, Compliance Monitoring Service, and Brian D. Prowell, Ph.D., P.E., Advanced Materials Services, LLC, “WMA Energy Savin gs and Emission Reductions Preliminary Report,” (PowerPoint presentation) Sept ember 6, 2011. g. Bob Frank, Compliance Monitoring Service, Brian D. Prowell, Ph.D., P.E., Graham C. Hurley, P.E. Advanced Materials Services, LLC, Rand y C. West, Ph.D., P.E., Director National Center for Asphalt Technology, “Warm Mix A sphalt (WMA) Emission Reductions and Energy Savings,” September 6, 2011. h. Memorandum, State of California, Department of Tran sportation, “Contractor Option for Use of Warm Mix Asphalt Technologies in Hot Mix Asp halt,” June 7, 2012. i. Katy Wolf, Institute for Research and Technical Ass istance, “Alternative Low-VOC Release Agents and Mold Cleaners for Industrial Mol ding, Concrete Stamping and Asphalt Applications,” October 2013. j. www.forconstructionpros.com , “Vulcan Builds Green Friendly Plant in Fresno,” J uly 9, 2015. k. South Coast AQMD Rule 1155, “Particulate Matter (PM ) Control Devices,” amended May 2, 2014. l. National Asphalt Pavement Association, Information Series 138, “Annual Asphalt Pavement Industry Survey on Recycled Materials and Warm-Mix Asphalt Usage: 2009– 2013,” October 2014. i. Appendix B: State-by-State Use of Recycled Material s and Warm-Mix Asphalt in Asphalt Pavement Mixtures

m. Email, Robert Lee, Texas Department of Transportati on, to Stanley Tong, Air Rules Office, Region 9, U.S. EPA, “Draft WMA Document,” F ebruary 18, 2015, with enclosure: i. Attachment: “ Guidance & Background on the Use of Warm Mix Asphal t (WMA).”

n. Stanley Tong, Air Rules Office, Region 9, U.S. EPA, notes from telephone conversation with Mathew Corrigan, Federal Highway Administratio n, dated February 19, 2015.

o. South Coast AQMD Governing Board meeting, “Rule and Control Measure Forecast,” June 5, 2015 p. Email, Morris, Michael, South Coast AQMD, to Stanle y Tong, Air Rules Office, Region 9, U.S. EPA, “RE: Asphalt release agent?,” June 23, 2015. q. www.graniteconstruction.com , “Locations,” accessed October 8, 2015 7:45 AM.

r. Matthew Corrigan, P.E., U.S. Department of Transpor tation, “Warm Mix Asphalt in the United States: From Evolution to Revolution,” (Powe rPoint presentation), November 19, 2014.

s. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration “WMA Technologies Warm Mix Asphalt Technologies,” undate d brochure.LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

14 C-2. Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters Grea ter than 5.0 MMBtu/hr.

a. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Rule 4306, Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters – Phase 3, amended October 16, 2008. b. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Rule 4320, Advanced Emission Reduction Options for Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters Greater than 5.0 MMBtu/hr, adopted October 16, 2008.

c. Email from Kevin Orellana, South Coast AQMD, to Ida lia Perez, Air Rules Office, Region 9, U.S. EPA, “RE: question about boilers in SC,” July 21, 2015. d. South Coast AQMD, “NO x RECLAIM Working Group Meeting,” (PowerPoint presentation), April 29, 2015.

e. South Coast AQMD, Rule 1146, Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Industrial, Institutional, and Commercial Boilers, Steam Genera tors, and Process Heaters, amended November 1, 2013. f. South Coast AQMD, Rule 2000, General [provisions fo r RECLAIM], amended May 6, 2005. C-3. Commercial Charbroiling.

a. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Charbroiler Incent ive Program (CHIP) Retrofit Eligibility Criteria and Application Guidelines, Au gust 2010. b. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, News Release: Air District offers charbroiler retrofits incentives, August 25, 2010.

c. Bay Area AQMD, Compliance Advisory: “Under-fired Ch arbroilers: Upcoming Requirements,” January 18, 2013. d. City of Manteca, Community Development Department, “Conditions of Approval, Taco Bell Site Plan Review and Minor Use Permit, Project File,” May 5, 2015.

e. University of California – Riverside, College of En gineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology, “Commercial Cooking Emissi ons Control South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2016 AQMP Control Stra tegy Symposium,” (PowerPoint presentation), June 11, 2015. f. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Governing Board, Mi nutes, June 18, 2015. g. Memorandum, Seyed Sadredin, Executive Director/APCO , San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, to San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Governing Board, RE: Item Number 7: Approve Next Steps for Addressing Emissions from Un der-Fired Commercial Charbroilers at Valley Restaurants, June 18, 2015. C-4. Compost Operations.

a. Arizona Agricultural Best Management Practices (BMP ) Committee, Draft Conference Call Minutes, Friday, November 21, 2014. b. California Public Resources Code, Section 41780-417 86, retrieved from http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.html/prc_table_of_conten ts.html on October 13, 2015

.LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

15 c. Composting and Anaerobic Digestion, draft June 18, 2013. d. “Composting At Home,” retrieved from http://www2.ep a.gov/recycle/composting-home on October 16, 2015.

e. San Joaquin Valley Technology Advancement Program, “Greenwaste Compost Site Emissions Reductions from Solar

‐ powered Aeration and Biofilter Layer,” May 14, 2013

. f. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Final Staff Report , Revised Proposed New Rule 4565, Biosolids, Animal Manure, and Poultry Litter Operations, March 30, 2007. i. Appendix C - Costs and Cost Effectiveness Analysis for Revised Proposed New Rule 4565, Biosolids, Animal Manure, and Poultry Li tter Operations. g. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Rule 4565, Biosolid s, Animal Manure, And Poultry Litter Operations, adopted March 15, 2007. h. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Final Staff Report , Revised Proposed New Rule 4566 – Organic Material Composting Operations, August 18 , 2011 i. Appendix C: Cost Effectiveness Analysis ii. Appendix D: Socioeconomic Analysis i. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Rule 4566, Organic Material Composting Operations, adopted August 18, 2011. C-5. Confined Animal Facilities.

a. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Rule 4570, Confined Animal Facilities, amended October 21, 2010. b. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, “Scienti fic Basis for the Control of Ammonia from Dairy Farms - Best Management Practice s,” July 18, 2006.

c. Email from Gabe Ruiz, CARB, to Nancy Levin, Air Rul es Office, Region 9, U.S. EP, “FW: SJV xLivestock Ammonia Emissions with and with out Rule 4570”, September 3, 2015. d. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, 58.01.01 - Rules for the Control of Air Pollution in Idaho (various dates).

e. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Final Staff Report , Rule 4570 - Confined Animal Facilities, Appendix C, June 18, 2009. C-6. Conservation Management Practices.

a. Arizona Revised Statures, 49-457, Agricultural best management practices committee; members; powers; permits; enforcement; preemption; definitions; accessed from http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/ 49/00457.htm&Title=49&DocT , October 15, 2015. b. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultur al Statistics Service, 2012 Census of Agriculture - County Data.LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

16 c. Arizona Agricultural Best Management Practices (BMP ) Committee, Meeting Minutes, April 25, 2014. d. Agricultural Best Management Practices (BMP) Commit tee, Draft Conference Call Minutes, Friday, November 21, 2014.

e. Arizona Administrative Register, Notice of Final Ex empt Rulemaking, Title 18. Environmental Quality, Chapter 2. Department of Env ironmental Quality, Air Pollution Control, changes to rules R18-2-210, R18-2-611, R18 -2-612, R18-2-613, Appendix 2 (Agricultural Best Management Practices), July 24, 2015. f. Arizona Senate Bill 1552, Conference Engrossed vers ion, Forty-eighth Legislature, First Regular Session, 2007. g. U.S. EPA, Atmospheric LiDar Coupled with Point Meas urement Air Quality Samplers to Measure Fine Particle Matter (PM) Emissions from Ag ricultural Operations. Part 2 of the California 2007 – 2008 Tillage Campaigns: Spring 20 08 Data Analysis, EPA/600/R14/19, August 2014 (accessible at www.epa.gov/resea rch). h. Imperial County APCD Rule 806, Conservation Managem ent Practices, revised October 16, 2012. i. Imperial County APCD Rule 420 Beef Feedlots, former ly Livestock Feed Yards, revised October 10, 2006. j. U.S. EPA, Air Quality System (AQS), Raw Data Qualif ier Report, Bakersfield – Planz, September 4, 2015. k. U.S. EPA, AQS, Raw Data Qualifier Report, Fresno, S eptember 4, 2015.

l. South Coast AQMD, Final Rule 403 Coachella Valley A gricultural Handbook: Measures to Reduce Dust from Agricultural Operations in the Coachella Valley, April 2004.

m. South Coast AQMD, Rule 403 Agricultural Handbook Me asures to Reduce Dust from Agricultural Operations in the South Coast Air Basi n, December 1998.

n. South Coast AQMD Rule 403, Fugitive Dust, amended J une 3, 2005.

o. South Coast AQMD Rule 403.1, Supplemental Fugitive Dust Control Requirements for Coachella Valley Sources, amended April 2, 2004. p. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Revised Final Staf f Report, Proposed Rule 4550 (Conservation Management Practices) and Proposed Ru le 3190 (Conservation Management Practices Plan Fee), August 19, 2004. q. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, List of Conservati on Management Practices, May 20, 2004, and August 19, 2004.

r. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Rule 4550, Conserv ation Management Practices, adopted August 19, 2004.

s. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Conservation Manag ement Practices Program Report for 2005, January 19, 2006.LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

17 t. University of California Cooperative Extension, Veg etable Research and Information Center, “San Joaquin Valley Agriculture,” http://vric.ucdavis.edu/virtual_tour/sanjoq.htm, ac cessed October 16, 2015. C-7. Dryers.

a. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Rule 4309, Dryers, Dehydrators, and Ovens, adopted December 15, 2015. C-8. Flares.

a. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Final Draft Staff Report - Revised Proposed Amendments to Rule 4311 – Flares, June 18, 2009. b. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Rule 4311 – Flares , Further Study, 2014.

c. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Rule 4311, Flares, amended June 18, 2009. C-9. Glass Melting Furnaces.

a. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Rule 4354, Glass M elting Furnaces, amended May 19, 2011. b. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Authority to Const ruct, Application Review, Rebuild and Expansion of Glass Furnace #2, Facility Name: G allo Glass Company, October 20, 2014.

c. South Coast AQMD, NO x RECLAIM Working Group Meeting (PowerPoint), April 29, 2015. C-10. Internal Combustion Engines.

a. Antelope Valley APCD, Rule 1110.2 , Emissions from Stationary, Non-road & Portable Internal Combustion Engines, Amended: January 21, 2 003. b. Bay Area AQMD, Regulation 9, Inorganic Gaseous Poll utants and Rule 8, Nitrogen Oxides and Carbon Monoxide from Stationary Internal Combustion Engines, July 25, 2007.

c. El Dorado County AQMD, Rule 233, Stationary Interna l Combustion Engines, amended June 6, 2006. d. U.S. EPA, Alternative Control Techniques Document – NO x Emissions from Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines, EPA/453R -93-032, July 1993.

e. Feather River AQMD, Rule 3.22, Stationary Internal Combustion Engines, amended October 6, 2014. f. Mojave Desert AQMD, Rule 1160, Internal Combustion Engines, amended: October 26, 1994. g. Mojave Desert AQMD 1160.1, Internal Combustion Engi nes in Agricultural Operations, adopted: January 23, 2012. h. Memorandum to Docket File EPA–R09–OAR–2015-0432, by Nicole Law, Air Rules Office, Region 9, U.S. EPA, RE: Call with San Joaqu in Valley Unified Air PollutionLIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

18 Control Districts on July 29, 2015 regarding facili ties using compliance fee option in SJVAPCD Rule 4702 between Nicole Law (EPA Region 9) and Errol Villegas (SJVAPCD), August 6, 2015. i. Placer County APCD, Rule 242, Stationary Internal C ombustion Engines, adopted April 10, 2003. j. Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD, Rule 412, Stationary Internal Combustion Engines Located at Major Stationary Sources of NO x , adopted June 1, 1995. k. San Diego APCD, Rule 69.4.1, Stationary Reciprocati ng Internal Combustion Engines – Best Available Retrofit Control Technology, adopted & effective November 15, 2000. l. South Coast AQMD, Rule 1110.2, Emissions From Gaseo us- and Liquid-Fueled Engines, amended February 1, 2008.

m. South Coast AQMD, Rule 1110.2, Emissions From Gaseo us- and Liquid-Fueled Engines, amended September 7, 2012.

n. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Rule 4702, Interna l Combustion Engines, amended January 18, 2007.

o. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Rule 4702, Interna l Combustion Engines, amended August 18, 2011. i. Appendix C: Cost Effectiveness Analysis p. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Rule 4702, Interna l Combustion Engines, amended November 14, 2013. q. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Rule 9510, Indirec t Source Review (ISR), adopted December 15, 2005.

r. South Coast AQMD, Final Staff Report for Proposed A mended Rule 1110.2 -- Emissions from Gaseous- and Liquid-Fueled Internal Combustion Engines and Rescission of Rule 1110.1 – Emissions from Stationary Internal Combust ion Engines, May 2005.

s. Ventura County APCD, Rule 74.9, Stationary Internal Combustion Engines, Revised, November 8, 2005. C-11. Open Burning.

a. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Rule 4103, Open Bu rning, amended April 15, 2010. b. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Table 9-1 – Crop C ategories and Revised Proposed Recommendations, from Revised Proposed Staff Report and Recommendations on Agricultural Burning, May 20, 2010.

c. Bay Area AQMD, Regulation 5, Open Burning, June 19, 2013. d. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, 2015 Agricultural Burn Report, Final 2015 Agricultural Burning Review, December 2015.

e. Letter from Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrato r, Region 9, U.S. EPA, to Seyed Sadredin, Air Pollution Control Officer, San Joaqui n Valley Unified APCD, dated March 23, 2012.LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

19 f. Letter from Kurt Karperos, Deputy Executive Officer , CARB, to Samir Sheik, Deputy APCO, San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, dated Decemb er 23, 2015. g. South Coast AQMD Rule 444, Open Burning, amended Ju ly 12, 2013. h. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, 2012 Update: Recom mendations on Agricultural Burning, May 2012. i. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Final Staff Report and Recommendations on Agricultural Burning, Amended Rule 4103, Appendices , April 2010. j. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Final Staff Report and Recommendations on Agricultural Burning, July 21, 2010. i. Chapters 1-2. ii. Chapters 3-6. iii. Chapters 7-10. k. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, “Proposed Smoke Ma nagement Program, Rules, Policies, and Procedures to Comply with the Califor nia Code of Regulations Title 17 Smoke Management Guidelines for Agricultural and Pr escribed Burning,” June 20, 2002. l. Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD, Rule 407, Open Burnin g, June 4, 1998.

m. Ventura County APCD, Rule 56, Open Burning, adopted November 11, 2003. C-12. Paved and Unpaved Roads.

a. Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee, Maricopa Association of Governments, “2013 Unpaved Roads Inventory for the Maricopa Coun ty PM-10 Nonattainment Area,” December 4, 2014. b. California Air Pollution Control Officers Associati on, “Unpaved Roads,” http://www.capcoa.org/ag-clearinghouse/beef/unpaved -roads/ , accessed October 8, 2015.

c. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Controlling Fugiti ve Dust Emissions, from https://www.valleyair.org/busind/comply/PM10/compli ance_PM10.htm , accessed October 8, 2015. d. U.S. EPA, Fugitive Dust Background Document and Tec hnical information Document for Best Available Control Measures, EPA-450/2-92-0 04, September 1992.

e. South Coast AQMD, Rule 1186, PM 10 Emissions from Paved and Unpaved Roads, and Livestock Operations, amended July 11, 2008. f. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Draft Amendments t o Regulation VIII, Responses to Comments on the Proposed Amendments to Regulation V III, August 19, 2004. g. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Rule 8061, Paved a nd Unpaved Roads, amended August 19, 2004. h. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Rule 8081, Agricul tural Sources, amended September 16, 2004.LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

20 i. Air Division, Region 9, U.S. EPA, “Technical Suppor t Document for EPA's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the California State Implem entation Plan San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District Regulation V III Fugitive Dust Rule,” May 20, 2005. j. South Coast AQMD, Rule 1157, PM 10 Emission Reductions from Aggregate and Related Operations, amended September 8, 2006. C-13. Wood Burning Fireplaces and Wood Burning Heaters.

a. CARB, Miscellaneous Processes Methodologies – Resid ential Fuel Combustion, Section 7.1, Residential Wood Combustion, February 2013 Met hodology and Appendices, available at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/ei/areasrc/arbmiscprocresfuel com.htm b. CARB, Staff Report, “ARB Review of San Joaquin Vall ey PM 2.5 State Implementation Plan,” release date April 20, 2015.

c. John S. Kinsey, Peter H. Kariher, Yuanji Dong, Eval uation of methods for the physical characterization of the fine particle emissions fro m two residential wood combustion appliances, Atmospheric Environment 43, (2009) 4959 –4967. d. Letter from Sheraz Gill, San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, to Andrew Steckel, Manager, Air Rules Office, Region 9, U.S. EPA, date d July 20, 2015.

e. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Rule 4101, Visible Emissions, adopted February 17, 2005. f. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Rule 4901, Wood Bu rning Fireplaces and Wood Burning Heaters, adopted September 18, 2014. g. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Final Staff Report for Amendments to the District’s Residential Wood Burning Program, September 18, 201 4. C-14. Solid Fuel Fired Boilers.

a. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Rule 4352, Solid F uel Fired Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters, amended December 1 5, 2011. b. Memorandum, Andrew Steckel, Manager, Air Rules Offi ce, Region 9, U.S. EPA, to Jessi Fierro, San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD and Mike Gu zzetta, CARB, Transmittal of EPA Rule Review Comments, Proposed Rule 4352, Solid Fuel Fired Boilers, November 30, 2011.

c. Memorandum, Michael H. Shapiro, Acting Assistant Ad ministrator for Air and Radiation, U.S. EPA to Air Division Directors, EPA Regions I-X, “Fuel Switching to Meet the Reasonably Available Control Technology (R ACT) Requirements for Nitrogen Oxides (NO x ),” July 30, 1993. d. Letter, David Warner, San Joaquin Valley Unified AP CD, Director of Permit Services, to Gerardo C. Rios, Manager, Air Permits Office, Regio n 9, U.S. EPA, Re: Proposed ATC I Certificate of Conformity (Significant Mod) Distric t Facility # N-645, April 29, 2011.LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

21 C-15. Stationary Gas Turbines.

a. San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD, Rule 4703, Station ary Gas Turbines, amended September 20, 2007. b. South Coast AQMD, NO x RECLAIM Working Group Meeting (PowerPoint), April 29, 2015. C-16. Non-California PM 10 Plans reviewed by San Joaquin Valley Metropolitan Planning Organizations in preparation of their 2014 Regional Transportation Plans:

a. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Office of the Governor , Environmental Quality Board, “Limited Maintenance Plan, 24 Hour Particulate Matt er (PM 10 ) National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Redesignation Request for the Municipality of Guaynabo Moderate Nonattainment Area, State Implementation P lan Revision,” December 2008. b. Washoe County Health District, “Redesignation Reque st and Maintenance Plan for the Truckee Meadows 24-Hour PM 10 Non-attainment Area,” Adopted May 28, 2009.

c. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, “A mendments to State Air Quality Control Plan, Vol. II: Analysis of Problems, Contro l Actions, Section III.D.2 Eagle River PM-10 Limited Maintenance Plan,” Adopted Augu st 20, 2010. d. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, “Final 2012 State Implementation Plan, Nogales PM 10 Nonattainment Area,” July 23, 2012. C-17. David D. Parrish, Tropospheric Chemistry Group, Che mical Sciences Division, Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL), National Oceanic and At mospheric Administration, “Synthesis of CalNex Policy Relevant Findings from the CalNex 2010 Field Study (California Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change),” M arch 27, 2014.

C-18. Copyrighted research papers, available only in hard copy at U.S. EPA, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, California:

a. Chen, J., Lu, J., Avise, J.C., DaMassa, J.A., Kleem an, M.J., Kaduwela, A.P., 2014, Seasonal Modeling of PM 2.5 in California’s San Joaquin Valley, Atmospheric Environment, 92, 182-190, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.20 14.04.030. b. Kleeman, M.J., Ying, Q., and Kaduwela, A., Control strategies for the reduction of airborne particulate nitrate in California's San Jo aquin Valley, Atmospheric Environment, 2005, 39, 5325-5341.

c. Liang, J., Gürer, K., Allen, P.D., Zhang, K.M., Yin g, Q., Kleeman, M., Wexler, A., and Kaduwela, A., 2006, A photochemical model investiga tion of an extended winter PM episode observed in Central California: Model Perfo rmance Evaluation, Proceedings of the 5th Annual CMAQ Models-3 User’s Conference, Cha pel Hill, NC. d. Lurmann, F.W., Brown, S.G., McCarthy, M.C., and Rob erts, P.T., December 2006, Processes Influencing Secondary Aerosol Formation i n the San Joaquin Valley during Winter, Journal of Air and Waste Management Associa tion, 56, 1679-1693.

e. Sulfate, Adjusted Nitrate, Derived Water, Inferred Carbonaceous mass material balance approach: Modeling Guidance, p. 47; Frank, N., 2006 : “Retained Nitrate, Hydrated Sulfates, and Carbonaceous Mass in Federal Referenc e Method Fine Particulate Matter for Six Eastern U.S. Cities,” J. Air Waste Manageme nt Assoc., 56, 500-511.LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

22 f. Qi Ying, Jin Lu, Michael Kleeman, Modeling air qual ity during the California Regional PM 10 /PM 2.5 Air Quality Study (CPRAQS) using the UCD/CIT sourc e-oriented air quality model - Part III. Regional source apportionment of secondary and total airborne particulate matter, Atmospheric Environment, Volume 43, Issue 2, January 2009, Pages 419-430, ISSN 1352-2310, DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.20 08.08.033. g. Livingstone, P.L. et. al., 2009, “Simulating PM Con centrations during a Winter Episode in a Subtropical Valley and Sensitivity Simulations and Evaluation methods”, Atmospheric Environment, 43: 5971-5977. doi:10.1016 /j.atmosenv.2009.07.033. h. Pun, B.K., Balmori R.T.F, and Seigneur, C., 2009, M odeling wintertime particulate matter formation in Central California, Atmospheric Environment, 43, 402-409. Different models and emission inventories in these studies co nducted over the years also contribute to the variation in results. i. Chen, J., Ying, Q., and Kleeman, M.J., 2010, Source apportionment of wintertime secondary organic aerosol during the California reg ional PM 10 /PM 2.5 air quality study, Atmospheric Environment, 44(10), 1331-1340. j. Z. Meng, D. Dabdub, and J. H. Seinfeld, "Chemical C oupling Between Atmospheric Ozone and Particulate Matter", Science 277, 116 (19 97); DOI: 10.1126/science.277.5322.116.

D. Notices of Proposed Rulemaking and Technical Suppor t Documents

D-1. Approval and Disapproval of California Air Plan; Sa n Joaquin Valley Serious Area Plan and Attainment Date Extension for the 1997 PM 2.5 NAAQS; Proposed rule. 81 FR 6936 (February 9, 2016).

a. Approval and Disapproval of California Air Plan; Sa n Joaquin Valley Serious Area Plan and Attainment Date Extension for the 1997 PM 2.5 NAAQS; Proposed rule. Prepublication version (January 28, 2016). D-2. U.S. EPA, Region 9 Air Division, “General Technical Support Document for EPA’s Proposed Rule on the 2015 PM 2.5 Plan for the San Joaquin Valley for the 1997 PM 2.5 NAAQS,” January 2016, with enclosures:

a. U.S. EPA AQS, Quick Look Report AMP450, performed A ugust 8, 2014. b. U.S. EPA, 2013 Design Value Reports, PM 2.5 Detailed Information, updated August 28, 2014.

c. U.S. EPA, AQS, Combined Site Values Report AMP355, performed June 30, 2015. d. U.S. EPA, AQS, Design Value Report AMP480, performe d June 30, 2015.

e. U.S. EPA, AQS, Quick Look Report AMP450, performed August 15, 2015. f. U.S. EPA, AQS, Combined Site Values Report AMP355, performed January 20, 2016. g. U.S. EPA, AQS, Design Value Report AMP480, performe d January 20, 2016. h. U.S. EPA, Region 9, “San Joaquin Valley and Practic ability of Attaining the 1997 PM 2.5 NAAQS by December 31, 2015,” dated October 13, 2015

.LIST OF DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET FOR

THE U.S. EPA’S PROPOSED ACTION AT 81 FED. REG. 6936 (February 9, 2016)

[Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0432]

23 i. U.S. EPA, Region 9, “San Joaquin Valley and Practic ability of Attaining the 1997 PM 2.5 NAAQS by December 31, 2015,” dated January 21, 2016

. j. U.S. EPA, Region 9, “Status of San Joaquin Valley A ir Pollution Control District Rules,” updated January 22, 2016. D-3. Region 9 Air Division Rules Office, U.S. EPA, “Tech nical Support Document for EPA’s Evaluation of Best Available Control Measures and M ost Stringent Measures for Fine Particulate Matter Emissions from Stationary and Ar ea Sources in the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District,” January 2016. D-4. Scott Bohning, Region 9 Air Division, U.S. EPA, “Te chnical Support Document for EPA Evaluation of Interpollutant Trading Ratios in the 2015 San Joaquin PM 2.5 Plan,” January 2016, with enclosures

a. Memo to file, Scott Bohning, Air Quality Analysis O ffice, Region 9, U.S. EPA, “Subject: Contingency precursor effectiveness ratio using add itional information,” August 12, 2013, with attachments

E. Public Comments and Related Documents <RESERVED>

F. Additional Documents Considered for Final Rulemakin g <RESERVED>

G. Notice of Final Rulemaking and Technical Support Do cument <RESERVED>