alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Special Education /
              - 11.6 Special Education—Graduation Rate among Students Ages 14-21 Served under IDEA, Part B

## Table 11.6: Special Education—Graduation Rate[1] among Students Ages 14 to 21 Served under IDEA, Part B: 2010-2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
October 1, 2015 

RE: Response to rejection of Section 333 exemption request Docket FAA-2015-2514 

Great Bend Coop in our request for exemptions would like to clarify that it would be of great public 

interest for acceptance of our Section 333 exemption. We feel the eBee is extremely safe, being it is very 

light and efficient and having an electric motor is also very economically safe on the environment. It is 

very efficient allowing us to be more productive in our benefits to growers. Using the eBee we can 

efficiently decide where fertilizer applications should be placed and limit any run-off which in turn helps 

the environment. 

Great Bend Coop could see great growth with the approval of our request. The growth could open more 

jobs in the area and aide in the current unemployment struggle the nation is battling. 

If you have any further questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact 

me. 

Thank you for your consideration of this matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Junior Welsch 

Junior Welsch 

Crop Production Operations Director 

GREAT BEND COOP ASSOCIATION 

323 So 281 Hwy, Great Bend, KS 67530 

Office: 620-793-5031 Toll Free: 888-892-5031 

Fax: 620-792-8003 Cell: 620-282-2640 

Email: jrwelsch@coop.kscoxmail.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
KNICKERBOCKER VILLAGE INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  565,888
<ALLOWANCES>                                   312,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,779,544
<PP&E>                                      17,365,014
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,423,499
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,782,373
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,843,654
<BONDS>                                      6,008,130
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          317,048
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     984,959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,782,373
<SALES>                                      9,307,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,345,599
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,332,546
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                83,298
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             638,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,053
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,702
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,351
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,351
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
E 

### NEY GENERAL OF EXAS

~USTXN. TEXAS 78711 CElAW'PORD C. MARTIN September 1,1970

hon. Enrique Ii.Pena County Attorney Opinion MO. M- 679
Room 201, City-Co;;&Bldg. Re: Whether aJustice of El Paso, Texas the Peace who transfers a criminal case to Attention: Steve W. Simmons another Justice of the

First Assistant Peace in the same county is entitled to a four dollar fee asprovided in Art. 1052, Texas Code Dear Sir: of Criminal Procedure? You have asked an opinion of this office as to whether aJustice of the Peace on a fee basis is entitled to a fee for acriminal case which he has transferred to another court in the same county. Art. 1052, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, provides, inpart, as follows:

"Fourdollars ($4)shall be paid to the Justice of the Peace for each criminal action tried and finally disposed of before him...."
Art. 1052 answers your question fully. Uy the use of the conjunctive word, "and", the Leg~islaturehasmade clear its intent that a criminal action must be first tried, and, in addition, must also be finally disposed of by the Justice of the Peace before he is entitled to collect the four dollar fee due him for theperformance of these two functions. Utilizing the rule of construction thatwords in a statute should be construed with reference to the common and ordinary usage of thewords, we conclude that the definition cf "trial" as found inArticle 1052 iswell defined inDrackenrcdqe v. State, 11S.W. f30 (Tex.Civ.AnP. 1881).nowrit). having before i,t suustantially ‘theSame~StatUtory langUag6 as inArticle 1052, the court held that a county judgewas not entitled to a fee for actions dismissed without trial. -3244-Hon. Enrique II.Pena, paqe 2 (PI- 679)

The Court said:

"Atrial is an examination before a competent tribunal, according to the laws of the land of the facts put into issue for thepurpose of determining such issue." Obviously, therefore, no trial ishad by the justice courtwhere that court transfers the case to another court for trial of the facts nut into issue.

SJI~L'IARY __,- "AJustice of the Peace is npt entitled to dollect a fee for actions transferred or dismissed without trial. 43.-t. 1052, Texas Criminal Procedure." ? Your,5very truly,

I

Prepared by Bennie X. Bock, II Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINIOl?Co:*lE~:ITTEE Kerns Taylor, Cllairman w.c.Allen, Co-Chairman William J. Craiq Scott Garrison Dunk Sullivan Gordon Cass HEADC F. GRIFFI:: Staff Legal Assistant ALFRCD T,?ALE;ER Executive Assistant iJOLA::!IITE First Assistant ;;\ttorney General
-3245-
§ 1980.112 Judicial review. ( a ) Within 60 days after the issuance of a final order (including a decision issued by the Secretary upon his or her discretionary review) for which judicial review is available, any person adversely affected or aggrieved by the order may file a petition for review of the order in the United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which the violation allegedly occurred or the circuit in which the complainant resided on the date of the violation.
( b ) A final order is not subject to judicial review in any criminal or other civil proceeding.
( c ) If a timely petition for review is filed, the record of a case, including the record of proceedings before the ALJ, will be transmitted by the ARB or the ALJ, as the case may be, to the appropriate court pursuant to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the local rules of such court.
[80 FR 11880, Mar. 5, 2015, as amended at 85 FR 30622, May 20, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (IN THOUSANDS,
EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA).
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          19,418
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,571
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (519)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,858
<PP&E>                                           9,672
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,201
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,064
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,201
<SALES>                                         12,643
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,643
<CGS>                                            5,338
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,244
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 374
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,227)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,227)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,227)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)


</TABLE>
§ 37.82 Does the Director accept every complaint for resolution? No. The Director must determine whether CRC will accept a particular complaint for resolution. For example, a complaint need not be accepted if: ( a ) It has not been timely filed;
( b ) CRC has no jurisdiction over the complaint; or
( c ) CRC has previously decided the matter.
#### § 2703.2 Designated agency ethics official and alternate designated agency ethics official.

The Chairman shall appoint an individual to serve as the designated agency ethics official, and an individual to serve in an acting capacity in the absence of the primary designated agency ethics official (alternate designated agency ethics official), to coordinate and manage the Commission's ethics program.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 152 (Monday, August 8, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 48101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19985]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

46 CFR Parts 1, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14

[Docket No. USCG-2004-17914]
 RIN 1625-AA16


Implementation of the Amendments to the International Convention 
on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 
1978, and Changes to Domestic Endorsements

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of public meetings; request for comments; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 2, 2011 (76 FR 46217), the Coast Guard published a 
notice of public meetings and request for comments on a supplemental 
notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) entitled ``Implementation of the 
Amendments to the International Convention on Standards of Training, 
Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978, and Changes to 
Domestic Endorsements.'' The incorrect publication date of the SNPRM 
was cited. This notice corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Rogers Henderson, Maritime 
Personnel Qualification Division, U.S. Coast Guard, telephone 202-372-
1408, e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#beecd1d9dbcccd90e990f6dbd0dadbcccdd1d0fecbcdddd990d3d7d2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a7f5c8c0c2d5d489f089efc2c9c3c2d5d4c8c9e7d2d4c4c089cacecb">[email protected]</span></a>. If you have questions on 
viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Ms. Renee V. Wright, 
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 2, 2011 (76 FR 46217), the Coast 
Guard published a notice of public meetings and request for comments on 
a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) entitled 
``Implementation of the Amendments to the International Convention on 
Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 
1978, and Changes to Domestic Endorsements.'' Subsequent to the 
publication of that notice, the Coast Guard discovered that the 
publication date of the SNPRM on page 46217 was incorrect.

Correction

    In the notice (FR Doc. 2011-19459) published on August 2, 2011 (76 
FR 46217) make the following correction. On page 46217, in the first 
sentence of the second paragraph in the third column, the date should 
read ``August 1, 2011'' instead of ``August 1, 2001.''

    Dated: August 2, 2011.
Erin Ledford,
LCDR, Deputy, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law.
[FR Doc. 2011-19985 Filed 8-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 2580.412-9 Meaning of fraud or dishonesty.

The term “fraud or dishonesty” shall be deemed to encompass all those risks of loss that might arise through dishonest or fraudulent acts in handling of funds as delineated in § 2580.412-6. As such, the bond must provide recovery for loss occasioned by such acts even though no personal gain accrues to the person committing the act and the act is not subject to punishment as a crime or misdemeanor, provided that within the law of the state in which the act is committed, a court would afford recovery under a bond providing protection against fraud or dishonesty. As usually applied under state laws, the term “fraud or dishonesty” encompasses such matters as larceny, theft, embezzlement, forgery, misappropriation, wrongful abstraction, wrongful conversion, willful misapplication or any other fraudulent or dishonest acts. For the purposes of section 13, other fraudulent or dishonest acts shall also be deemed to include acts where losses result through any act or arrangement prohibited by title 18, section 1954 of the U.S. Code.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 13

About Lawter International, Inc.

Our Company

As the world's leading supplier of specialty polymers to the graphic arts
industry, Lawter International defines the standard for innovation, quality and
service. Founded in 1940, Lawter has grown to an international corporation with
more than 600 employees in 10 countries, working as a team to develop,
manufacture and market products that are continually exceeding expectations for
performance.

Our Markets

Lawter produces printing ink vehicles, resins and slip additives, as well as
additives for coatings and adhesives. Printing ink vehicles are fluid and gelled
compositions that allow lithographic and letterpress printing inks to apply
color and coatings to paper, plastic, metal and other surfaces. They influence
critical production issues such as print quality, gloss, drying speed, adhesion,
rub resistance and press speed. Lawter synthetic and hydrocarbon resins are used
in the production of adhesives, liquid printing inks and printing ink vehicles,
rubber compounds and paints and coatings to improve durability, chemical
resistance, appearance, adhesion and drying speed.

Our Products

Lawter products are sold worldwide to ink manufacturers and other customers
involved in developing specialty inks, paints, coatings and adhesives. These are
growth markets, driven by rising demand for everyday products such as newspapers
and printed publications, packaging and wrapping. The market for inks is
expected to grow by more than 20 percent worldwide over the next five years.

Our Strategic Advantage

Traditionally, Lawter has delivered superior products at competitive prices.
Over the past few years, the company has invested more than $100 million in
state-of-the-art research and development and manufacturing facilities in
America, Europe and Asia, supporting a strategic growth plan for the future.
Today, with proprietary technologies, modern facilities, a global presence and a
progressive corporate culture, Lawter is in a unique position to develop
stronger customer relationships and expand into new markets.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 27 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 27

Supporting the goals and ideals of ``National Purple Heart Recognition 
                                 Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 12, 2007

   Mrs. Clinton (for herself and Mr. Hagel) submitted the following 
  concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the goals and ideals of ``National Purple Heart Recognition 
                                 Day''.

Whereas the Purple Heart is the oldest military decoration in the world in 
        present use;
Whereas the Purple Heart is awarded in the name of the President of the United 
        States to members of the Armed Forces who are wounded in a conflict with 
        an enemy force or are wounded while held by an enemy force as prisoners 
        of war, and is awarded posthumously to the next of kin of members of the 
        Armed Forces who are killed in a conflict with an enemy force or who die 
        of wounds received in a conflict with an enemy force;
Whereas the Purple Heart was established on August 7, 1782, during the 
        Revolutionary War, when General George Washington issued an order 
        establishing the Honorary Badge of Distinction, otherwise known as the 
        Badge of Military Merit;
Whereas the award of the Purple Heart ceased with the end of the Revolutionary 
        War, but was revived in 1932, the 200th anniversary of George 
        Washington's birth, out of respect for his memory and military 
        achievements; and
Whereas observing National Purple Heart Recognition Day is a fitting tribute to 
        George Washington and to the more than 1,535,000 recipients of the 
        Purple Heart, approximately 550,000 of whom are still living: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of ``National Purple 
        Heart Recognition Day'';
            (2) encourages all people in the United States to learn 
        about the history of the Purple Heart and to honor its 
        recipients; and
            (3) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling on the people of the United States to conduct 
        appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to demonstrate 
        support for members of the Armed Forces who have been awarded 
        the Purple Heart.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.53


 


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO OPTION AGREEMENT


 


This AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO OPTION AGREEMENT
(the “Second Amendment”), dated February 6, 2015,(the “Second Amendment Effective Date”), amends that certain
Option Agreement dated October 27, 2014 (the “Original Agreement”) as amended by the First Amendment to the Option
Agreement dated January 5, 2015 (the “First Amendment” and together with the Original Agreement, the “Option
Agreement”), between Amarantus Bioscience Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Amarantus”) and Lonza Walkersville,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Lonza”). The parties identified above are sometimes hereinafter individually referred
to as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.” Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the
meanings assigned to them in the Option Agreement.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, upon the terms and subject to the
conditions contain herein, Lonza and Amarantus have agreed to further amend the Option Agreement;


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration for the
mutual covenants, agreements and


representations and warranties contained herein and the Option
Agreement, the Parties, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:


 


ARTICLE I — Amendment


 


		1.	The second to last sentence of Paragraph (c) of the First Amendment shall be amended to read, in its entirety, as follows:



 


“No more than $800,000 is due and payable collectively
under the First Amendment and Second Amendment.”


 


		2.	Paragraph (d) of the First Amendment shall be amended to read, in its entirety, as follows:



 


“(d) Extension of Option
Period.     The Option Period as defined in Section 1.1 of the Option Agreement is extended, upon
payment of $400,000 of the additional consideration set forth in (c) above, through February 28, 2015 and may be further extended,
upon payment of an additional $300,000 of the additional consideration set forth in (c) above, through March 31, 2015; provided,
however, if Lonza and Amarantus do not enter into the Settlement Agreement and Dismissal of Litigation by February 23, 2015, the
Option Period and Option Agreement shall be immediately terminated on February 23, 2015.”


 


		3.	In addition to the consideration already paid under the Original Agreement and First Amendment, Amarantus shall pay Lonza $100,000,
with Amarantus paying the first $50,000 of such amount to Lonza on the Second Amendment Effective Date, with the balance to be
paid by Amarantus to Lonza by February 20, 2015, each by wire transfer of immediately available funds to an account previously
specified in writing by Lonza



 


All other terms not identified herein shall remain unchanged.


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties
hereto has executed this Second Amendment as of the day and year first above written.


 


	 	AMARANTUS BIOSCIENCE HOLDINGS, INC.


 


	 	By: 	 	 
	 	 	Name:
	 	 	Title:


 


	 	LONZA WALKERSVILLE, INC.


 


	 	By:	 	 
	 	 	Name:
	 	 	Title: