alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1910.301 Introduction. This subpart addresses electrical safety requirements that are necessary for the practical safeguarding of employees in their workplaces and is divided into four major divisions as follows: ( a ) *Design safety standards for electrical systems.* These regulations are contained in §§ 1910.302 through 1910.330. Sections 1910.302 through 1910.308 contain design safety standards for electric utilization systems. Included in this category are all electric equipment and installations used to provide electric power and light for employee workplaces. Sections 1910.309 through 1910.330 are reserved for possible future design safety standards for other electrical systems.
( b ) *Safety-related work practices.* These regulations will be contained in §§ 1910.331 through 1910.360.
( c ) *Safety-related maintenance requirements.* These regulations will be contained in §§ 1910.361 through 1910.380.
( d ) *Safety requirements for special equipment.* These regulations will be contained in §§ 1910.381 through 1910.398.
( e ) *Definitions.* Definitions applicable to each division are contained in § 1910.399.
[46 FR 4056, Jan. 16, 1981; 46 FR 40185, Aug. 7, 1981]
#### WYMER-HARRIS CONSTRUCTION CO v GLASS, Admr, etc.

Ohio Supreme Court

No 22056.

Decided May 21, 1930

Marshall, CJ., Kinkade, Jones, Matthias, Da^ and Allen,, JJ., concur.
#### MAHOOD v CALDWELL et

Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Summit Co

No. 1677.

Decided November 18, 1929

Messrs. Meade & Weygandt, Akron, for Mahood.

Messrs. Roetzel. Hunsicker & Olds and Berk, Berk, & Harvey, Akron, for Caldwell et.

Syllabus by

FUNK. P. J.

1. Where two or more persons, by the illegal sales of intoxicating liquor, contribute to the intoxication of another person, which results in an injury to such person and requires another to take care of and provide for him, they may be jointly and severally liable, under 6202 GC, although the sale bv each may have been without the knowledge and preconcert of the others.

2. A petition alleged that joint defendants sold denatured. alcohol with the knowledge that it was to be drunk for the purpose of causing intoxication, and that the buyer drank it and thereby became Jntoxieated and unconscious, and that plaintiff took charge of and provided for such intoxicated person:

Held, that defendants will not be heard to deny that such liquid is a compound fit for use for beverage purposes, within the meaning of 6212-14 GC, and that such allegations state a cause of action under 6202 GC.

Full opinion will be published later.
§ 1986.103 Filing of retaliation complaints. ( a ) *Who may file.* A seaman who believes that he or she has been retaliated against by a person in violation of SPA may file, or have filed by any person on the seaman's behalf, a complaint alleging such retaliation.
( b ) *Nature of filing.* No particular form of complaint is required. A complaint may be filed orally or in writing. Oral complaints will be reduced to writing by OSHA. If a seaman is unable to file a complaint in English, OSHA will accept the complaint in any other language.
( c ) *Place of filing.* The complaint should be filed with the OSHA office responsible for enforcement activities in the geographical area where the seaman resides or was employed, but may be filed with any OSHA officer or employee. Addresses and telephone numbers for these officials are set forth in local directories and at the following Internet address: *http://www.osha.gov*
( d ) *Time for filing.* Not later than 180 days after an alleged violation occurs, a seaman who believes that he or she has been retaliated against in violation of SPA may file, or have filed by any person on his or her behalf, a complaint alleging such retaliation. The date of the postmark, facsimile transmittal, electronic communication transmittal, telephone call, hand-delivery, delivery to a third-party commercial carrier, or in-person filing at an OSHA office will be considered the date of filing. The time for filing a complaint may be tolled for reasons warranted by applicable case law.
( e ) *Relationship to section 11(c) complaints.* A complaint filed under SPA alleging facts that would also constitute a violation of section 11(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.S.C. 660(c), will be deemed to be a complaint under both SPA and section 11(c). Similarly, a complaint filed under section 11(c) that alleges facts that would also constitute a violation of SPA will be deemed to be a complaint filed under both SPA and section 11(c). Normal procedures and timeliness requirements under the respective statutes and regulations will be followed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens First Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) I, M. Todd Kanipe, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| By:    | /s/M.   Todd Kanipe                     |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | M.   Todd Kanipe                        |   |
|   | President   and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |                                    |   |
|   |                                    |   |
| Date:  | May   6, 2011                           |   |

 

This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed ‘filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.

 

----
ROLANDO BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1259

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 19, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

Rolando Brown, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Giselle D. Lylen, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, B.L. THOMAS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
# EUR-Lex - 32000R1534 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R1534

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1534/2000 of 13 July 2000 determining the sensitive production areas and/or the groups of high-quality varieties exempt from application of the quota buyback programme in raw tobacco **

*
Official Journal L 175 , 14/07/2000 P. 0078 - 0078 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1534/2000

of 13 July 2000

determining the sensitive production areas and/or the groups of high-quality varieties exempt from application of the quota buyback programme in raw tobacco

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1336/2000(2), and in particular Article 14a thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Under Article 34(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 of 22 December 1998 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 as regards the premium scheme, production quotas and the specific aid to be granted to producer groups in the raw tobacco sector(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1249/2000(4), the Commission must determine, on the basis of proposals from the Member States, which sensitive production areas and/or groups of high-quality varieties, up to a maximum of 25 % of each Member State's guarantee threshold, are to be exempt from application of the quota buyback programme.

(2) At the request of certain Member States, these groups of high-quality varieties should be determined.

(3) Article 35(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 stipulates that the Member State must make public its intention to sell from 1 September so that other producers may buy the quota before it is actually bought back. Therefore this Regulation must apply from 31 August 2000.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Tobacco,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities of groups of high-quality varieties exempt from quota buyback for the 2000 harvest are as follows:

in Portugal:

>TABLE>

in France:

>TABLE>

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 31 August 2000.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 July 2000.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 215, 30.7.1992, p. 70.

(2) OJ L 154, 27.6.2000, p. 2.

(3) OJ L 358, 31.12.1998, p. 17.

(4) OJ L 142, 16.6.2000, p. 3.
#### United Community Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v Greater New York Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, et al., Defendants, and Harran Transportation Company, Inc., et al., Appellants. (And Other Actions.)

[698 NYS2d 864]

—In related actions, *inter alia,*for judgments declaring the respective rights of the parties under certain insurance policies, the defendants Harran Transportation Company, Inc., and Harran Transportation School Bus Company appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), dated April 27, 1998, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Greater New York Mutual Insurance Company which was for summary judgment declaring that it was not obligated to defend or indemnify them in certain underlying actions.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in considering the respondent’s motion for summary judgment *(see, Liss v Trans Auto Sys.,*68 NY2d 15, 20; *Forte v Weiner,*214 AD2d 397, 398; *McIvor v Di Benedetto,*121 AD2d 519, 522; *see also, Aridas v Caserta,*41 NY2d 1059, 1061).

The Supreme Court properly determined that the acts alleged in the underlying actions seeking to recover damages for negligent hiring and supervision were intentional criminal acts which did not constitute an “occurrence” within the meaning of the subject general liability policies *(Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co. v Creative Hous.,*88 NY2d 347, 352-353; *see, Sweet Home Cent. School Dist. v Aetna Commercial Ins. Co.,*263 AD2d 949; *Matter of Sormani v Orange County Community Coll.,*263 AD2d 511; *Green Chimneys School for Little Folk v National Union Fire Ins. Co.,*244 AD2d 387). Thus, because there is no legal basis upon which the respondent can be held liable for coverage, the Supreme Court properly declared that the respondent has no duty to provide a defense or to indemnify the appellants in the underlying actions *(see, Sweet Home Cent. School Dist. v Aetna Commercial Ins. Co.,*supra; *Sormani v Orange County Community Coll.,*supra;*Green Chimneys School for Little Folk v National Union Fire Ins. Co., supra).*

*454The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, S. Miller and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
§ 38.18 Employment practices covered. ( a ) *Employment practices covered.* It is an unlawful employment practice to discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions, transgender status, and gender identity), national origin, age, disability, or political affiliation or belief in the administration of, or in connection with: ( 1 ) Any WIOA Title I-financially assisted program or activity; and
( 2 ) Any program or activity that is part of the one-stop delivery system and is operated by a one-stop partner listed in Section 121(b) of WIOA, to the extent that the program or activity is being conducted as part of the one-stop delivery system.
( b ) *Employee selection procedures.* In implementing this section, a recipient must comply with the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, 41 CFR part 60-3, where applicable.
( c ) *Standards for employment-related investigations and reviews.* In any investigation or compliance review, the Director must consider Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) regulations, guidance and appropriate case law in determining whether a recipient has engaged in an unlawful employment practice.
( d ) *Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.* As provided in § 38.3(b), 29 CFR part 32, subparts B and C and appendix A, which implement the requirements of Section 504 pertaining to employment practices and employment-related training, program accessibility, and reasonable accommodation, have been adopted by this part. Therefore, recipients must comply with the requirements set forth in those regulatory sections as well as the requirements listed in this part.
( e ) *Employers, employment agencies, or other entities.* ( 1 ) Recipients that are also employers, employment agencies, or other entities subject to or covered by Titles I and II of the ADA should be aware of obligations imposed by those titles. *See* 29 CFR part 1630 and 28 CFR part 35.
( 2 ) Recipients that are also employers, employment agencies, or other entities subject to or covered by Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 793) must meet their obligations imposed by that provision.
( f ) *Immigration and Nationality Act.* Similarly, recipients that are also employers covered by the anti-discrimination provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act should be aware of the obligations imposed by that provision. *See* 8 U.S.C. 1324b, as amended.
( g ) *State and local requirements.* This section does not preempt consistent State and local requirements.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 39 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 39

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas 40,000 people in the United States, and 1,200,000 people globally, die 
        in road crashes each year;
Whereas another 20,000,000 to 50,000,000 people globally are injured each year 
        as a result of speeding motor vehicles, the increasing use of motor 
        vehicles, and rapid urbanization;
Whereas the World Health Organization has predicted that by the year 2020 the 
        annual number of deaths from motor vehicle crashes is likely to surpass 
        the annual number of deaths from AIDS;
Whereas the current estimated cost of motor vehicle crashes worldwide is 
        $518,000,000,000 annually, representing between 3 and 5 percent of the 
        gross domestic product of each nation;
Whereas over 90 percent of motor vehicle-related deaths occur in low- and 
        middle-income countries;
Whereas according to the World Health Organization, motor vehicle-related deaths 
        and costs continue to rise in these countries due to a lack of 
        appropriate road engineering and injury prevention programs in public 
        health sectors; and
Whereas the United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution designating the 
        third Sunday of November as a day of remembrance for road crash victims 
        and their families, and called on nations globally to improve road 
        safety: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of a world day of 
        remembrance for road crash victims; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to 
        commemorate a world day of remembrance for road crash victims 
        with appropriate ceremonies, programs, and other activities.

            Passed the Senate October 4, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 39

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Supporting the goals and ideals of a world day of remembrance for road 
                             crash victims.
```
# Diario Oficial C 194A/30 d

| | ISSN 1725-244X |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 194A |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 47o año30 de julio de 2004 |

ISSN 1725-244X

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 194A

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

47o año30 de julio de 2004

---

| Número de información | Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Informaciones |
| | Consejo |
| 2004/C 194A/1 | Anuncio de plaza vacante — Agencia Europea de Defensa — Directores | 1 |
| | Observatorio Europeo del Racismo y la Xenofobia |
| 2004/C 194A/2 | Convocatoria de candidaturas HOUA-A-2004 | 2 |

Número de información

Sumario

Página

III   Informaciones

Consejo

2004/C 194A/1

Anuncio de plaza vacante — Agencia Europea de Defensa — Directores

1

Observatorio Europeo del Racismo y la Xenofobia

2004/C 194A/2

Convocatoria de candidaturas HOUA-A-2004

2

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

III Informaciones

Consejo

| 30.7.2004 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | CA 194/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2004

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

CA 194/1

---

ANUNCIO DE PLAZA VACANTE

Agencia europea de defensa

Directores

(2004/C 194 A/01)

La Agencia Europea de Defensa desea cubrir cuatro puestos de Director para sus cuatro Direcciones:

| — | Desarrollo de las capacidades militares (Ref. EDA/A/2004/012), |
| --- | --- |

—

Desarrollo de las capacidades militares (Ref. EDA/A/2004/012),

| — | Investigación y tecnología (Ref. EDA/A/2004/029), |
| --- | --- |

—

Investigación y tecnología (Ref. EDA/A/2004/029),

| — | Armamento (Ref. EDA/A/2004/042), |
| --- | --- |

—

Armamento (Ref. EDA/A/2004/042),

| — | Industria y mercado de la defensa (Ref. EDA/A/2004/051). |
| --- | --- |

—

Industria y mercado de la defensa (Ref. EDA/A/2004/051).

Para obtener más información (disponible en inglés), así como los formularios de presentación de candidaturas, deberá consultar el sitio web: http://ue.eu.int (contactos/ofertas de empleo).

Finalización del plazo de presentación: 3 de septiembre de 2004. Dará fe el matasellos de correos.

---

Observatorio Europeo del Racismo y la Xenofobia

| 30.7.2004 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | CA 194/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2004

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

CA 194/2

---

CONVOCATORIA DE CANDIDATURAS HOUA-A-2004

(2004/C 194 A/02)

El Observatorio Europeo del Racismo y la Xenofobia (EUMC) busca candidatos con el fin de cubrir algunos puestos. Se publica información detallada sobre estos puestos, las misiones del Observatorio y el procedimiento que debe seguirse para preparar una solicitud en el sitio Internet del Observatorio en la siguiente dirección: http://eumc.eu.int

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in
connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SERENA Software, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2005 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



I, Robert I. Pender, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of SERENA Software, Inc. certify that:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of SERENA Software, Inc.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    ROBERT I. PENDER,
JR.Robert I. Pender, Jr. Senior Vice President, Finance And Administration, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial And Accounting Officer) And Director




Date: September 9, 2005
JEROME SCOTT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5146

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 24, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Jefferson County.

Karen A. Gievers, Judge.

Jerome Scott, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MARSTILLER, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
§ 2570.42 Notice of proposed exemption. If the Department tentatively decides that an administrative exemption is warranted, it will publish a notice of a proposed exemption in the Federal Register. In addition to providing notice of the pendency of the exemption before the Department, the notice will: ( a ) Explain the exemption transaction and summarize the information and reasons in support of proposing the exemption;
( b ) Describe the scope of relief and any conditions of the proposed exemption;
( c ) Inform interested persons of their right to submit comments to the Department (either electronically or in writing) relating to the proposed exemption and establish a deadline for receipt of such comments; and
( d ) If the proposed exemption includes relief from the prohibitions of ERISA section 406(b), Code section 4975(c)(1)(E) or (F), or FERSA section 8477(c)(2), inform interested persons who are materially affected by the grant of the exemption of their right to request a hearing under § 2570.46 and establish a deadline for hearing requests to be submitted.