alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lewis Nordlinger, App’lt, *v.*Adolph Anderson *et al.,*Resp’ts.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,*

*Filed, May 24, 1889*)

Evidence—Testimony taken by commission—When suppressed.

Where it appears upon the trial that the testimony of a witness taken by commission was given under written memoranda, or directions sent to him in behalf of a plaintiff before his deposition was taken, the judge lias the power to suppress it.

Appeal from a judgment of the special term dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint upon the merits.

*Frederick W. Hinrichs,*for app’lt; *James M. Hunt,*for resp’t, Charles Huns; *.John H. Corwin,*for resp’t, Harris.

*241Macomber, J.

The only question before us is one of fact. The learned judge at the trial, evidently upon an attentive examination of the evidence, has dismissed the complaint upon the merits.

The ground upon which it was.- sought to set aside the assignment made to the defendant Harris by the defendant Anderson for the benefit of creditors, was that the respond- 0 ent Charles Huns was preferred m the sum of $2,000 more than was the actual indebtedness of the assignor to him; and that there hqd been an unlawful and fraudulent disposition of funds of the assignor, immediately prior to the assignment

The clear weight of the evidence shows that both of these grounds of assault upon the assignment are untenable. It is conclusively established that the indebtedness of the firm to Charles Muns was §9,000, being $2,000 in excess of the sum for which he was preferred in the assignment.

Several unimpeached and apparently just witnesses show that the other claims against the validity of the assignment were untenable, and that there was no unlawful payment of funds of the firm preceding the assignment.

Against the evidence upon, which the learned judge at special term has rested his decision, there is substantially the unsupported testimony of Adolph Anderson alone. His deposition was taken by "commission at Hew Orleans. It appeared upon the trial that such • testimony was given under written memoranda or directions sent to him in behalf of the plaintiff before his deposition was taken. Had this ’ been known before trial, it would have been sufficient to suppress the deposition.

On the whole we are- inclined to think, when such fact was made to appear at the trial, the judge had the power then to suppress it. But this proposition is unimportant now, in view of the final disposition that was made of the case by him. The judgment should be affirmed with costs.

Van Brunt, Ch. J.. and Bartlett, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT  32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

In  connection with the Annual Report of FTS Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief
Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company, certifies,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 3(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Scott  Gallagher
______________________________________
By:  Scott  Gallagher
Chief  Executive  Officer
April  14th,  2004


/s/  Linda  Ehlen
______________________________________
By:  Linda  Ehlen
Chief  Financial  Officer
April  14th,  2004
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 853 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 853

  To deauthorize the project for navigation, Northeast Harbor, Maine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 13, 2007

   Ms. Snowe introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To deauthorize the project for navigation, Northeast Harbor, Maine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NORTHEAST HARBOR, MAINE.

    The project for navigation, Northeast Harbor, Maine, authorized by 
section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 12, chapter 19), is 
deauthorized as of the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1450.5 Other procedures.

Nothing contained in this regulation is intended to require FMCS to duplicate administrative proceedings required by contract or other laws or regulations.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Population Statistics: Disability Type /
              - 15.1 Civilians Living in the Community for the United States and States, by Age, Disability Status, and Severity

## Table 15.1: Civilians Living in the Community for the United States and States, by Age, Disability Status, and Severity:2010

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Special Education /
              - 11.2 Special Education—Children and Students Served under IDEA, Part B, by Age

## Table 11.2: Special Education—Children and Students Served under IDEA, Part B, by Age: Fall 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL FORD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2024-0940

July 3, 2024

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, LaROSE, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
**EXHIBIT10.91**

 

**MODIFICATION OF LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT**

 

 

WHEREAS, this AGREEMENT is in reference to a loan which is evidenced byan instrument entitled LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT (“AGREEMENT”), datedFebruary 20, 2001, executed by and between LEE PHARMACEUTICALS as “BORROWER”AND PREFERRED BUSINESS CREDIT, INC. (“PBC”) as “LENDER.”

 

NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by the undersigned parties that theAGREEMENT shall be amended in the following respect:

 

In Section 2.1(b) of the AGREEMENT, PBC agrees to make revolving advancesto BORROWER in an amount equal to the lesser of (I) seventy percent (70%) ofthe amount of eligible accounts and (II) an amount equal to BORROWER’s cashcollections for the immediately preceding forty-five (45) day period.

 

In Section 2.8 of the AGREEMENT, the term of theAGREEMENT shall be extended to May 20, 2004.

 

Except as noted above, all the terms, conditions and provisions of saidAGREEMENT shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

 
| DATE:  April  23, 2002     |
|---------------------------------|
|                            |
| PREFERRED BUSINESS CREDIT, INC. | AGREED AND ACCEPTED: |
|                            |   |
|                            | LEE PHARMACEUTICALS |
|                            | a California corporation |
|                            |   |
|                            |
| BY:                             | FARHAD MOTIA |   |   |   |
|                            | Farhad Motia, President |   |   |
|                            |   | BY: | RONALD G. LEE |   |
|                            |   |   | Ronald G. Lee, President |   |
|                            |   |   |
|                                 |  |  |  |  |  |  |

 

----
#### COMMERCIAL BANKING & TRUST CO Exr v TENANTS REALTY CO et

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist, Erie Co.

No 317.

Decided May, 1930

King, Ramsey & Flynn, Sandusky, for Commercial Banking & Trust Co.

Young & Young, Norwalk, for Realty Co.

*393WILLIAMS, J.

All the directors at the meeting which passed the resolution authorizing the execution of the leases were interested parties and there were lacking two contracting parties necessary to the execution of a valid contract. In re Liquidation of State Exchange Bank of Stryker, 26 Ohio App., 142. The directors occupied a fiduciary relation toward the stockholders, and when we consider that the leases in question were executed at a time when it was anticipated that the property would be sold for a considerable sum in excess of the amount paid for it, and that the directors caused to be executed to themselves leases which would yield six percent to the tsockholders on the price paid by The Tenants Realty Company when it purchased the building, and that within four months thereafter it was sold for more than twice the amount originally paid for it, and that the obvious purpose in executing the leases was so that large amounts might be obtained as bonuses when leases were surrendered on the sale of the property, we are of the opinion that the leases are invalid and that the plaintiff is entitled to have the full amount of $200,-000.00, received as the purchase price of the building, distributed as assets of the corporation. The directors of a corporation, as trustees of the stockholders, are bound to act in the interest of such stockholders and protect their rights in good faith.

It is claimed, however, by the defendants, that the plaintiff has waived its rights. Under the provisions of 8623-72 GC., dissenting shareholders who shall vote against *a*proposal for the sale of the company’s property, may object thereto within twenty days and demand in writing payment of the fair cash value of his shares and the corporation is required within thirty days after receipt of such demand, unless it is withdrawn with the consent of the corporation, to pay to such shareholder upon surrender of his certificate or shares, the fair cash value thereof as of the date before such vote was taken. In the instant case such demand was made but was withdrawn with the consent of the corporation. In our judgment after such withdrawal, the ,rights of the shareholder are restored and he may enforce such rights by proper action. To hold that plaintiff could not' maintain its action because of the demand made, would be to hold that after withdrawal of the demand, with the consent of the corporation, the owner of the stock did not have the rights of a shareholder. This court is of *394the opinion that such a conclusion is not warranted and that when the corporation consented to the • withdrawal, the rights of the shareholder were fully restored and such shareholder is entitled to have the assets of the corporation distributed according to law and equity.

A decree will therefore be enforced in behalf of the plaintiff, granting it relief as a shareholder as prayed for.

Lloyd and Richards, JJ., concur.
# Uradni list C 205A/13.

| | ISSN 1725-5244 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 205A |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Zvezek 4713. avgust 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5244

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 205A

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Zvezek 4713. avgust 2004

---

| Obvestilo št. | Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Objave |
| | Intelligent Energy Executive Agency |
| 2004/C 205A/1 | Razpis za prijave | 1 |

Obvestilo št.

Vsebina

Stran

III   Objave

Intelligent Energy Executive Agency

2004/C 205A/1

Razpis za prijave

1

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

III Objave

Intelligent Energy Executive Agency

| 13.8.2004 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | CA 205/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2004

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

CA 205/1

---

RAZPIS ZA PRIJAVE

(2004/C 205 A/01)

„Intelligent Energy Executive Agency“ (Izvršna agencija za program Inteligentna energija) išče kandidate za nekatera delovna mesta. Podrobnejše informacije o prostih delovnih mestih, delovanju Agencije in postopkih za prijavo, so objavljene na spletni strani Agencije: http://europa.eu.int/comm/energy/intelligent/index_en.html.

---
#### § 4000.22 What definitions do I need to know for these rules?

You need to know two definitions from § 4001.2 of this chapter: PBGC and person. You also need to know the following definitions:

*Business day* means a day other than a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday. *We* means the PBGC.

*You* means the person filing with us or the person providing the issuance to a third party.
#### § 1604.7 Pre-employment inquiries as to sex.

A pre-employment inquiry may ask “Male........., Female.........”; or “Mr. Mrs. Miss,” provided that the inquiry is made in good faith for a nondiscriminatory purpose. Any pre-employment inquiry in connection with prospective employment which expresses directly or indirectly any limitation, specification, or discrimination as to sex shall be unlawful unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
             PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Lancaster Colony Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John L. Boylan, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

/s/JOHN L. BOYLAN
-----------------
John L. Boylan
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
September 25, 2002


                                       43
VI 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 984 

For the relief of Jiao Ying Li. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 26, 2007 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Jiao Ying Li. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

6 1101 et seq.), Jiao Ying Li shall be considered to have 

7 been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent 

8 residence as of the date of the enactment of this Act upon 

9 payment of the required visa fees. 

10 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS. 

11 Upon the granting of permanent resident status to 

12 Jiao Ying Li, as provided in section 1, the Secretary of 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 984 IS

1 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1 dur2 ing the current or next following fiscal year the total num3 ber of immigrant visas available to natives of the country 

4 of the birth of Jiao Ying Li under section 202(a)(2) of 

5 the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

6 1152(a)(2)). 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

#### § 4.184 Posting of notice.

Posting of the notice provided by the Wage and Hour Division shall be in a prominent and accessible place at the worksite, as required by § 4.6(e). The display of the notice in a place where it may be seen by employees performing on the contract will satisfy the requirement that it be in a “prominent and accessible place”. Should display be necessary at more than one site, in order to assure that it is seen by such employees, additional copies of the poster may be obtained without cost from the Division. The contractor or subcontractor is required to notify each employee of the compensation due or attach to the poster any applicable wage determination specified in the contract listing all minimum monetary wages and fringe benefits to be paid or furnished to the classes of service employees performing on the contract.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                           2,351,622
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,187,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                       556,000
<INVENTORY>                                     15,092,393
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,209,064
<PP&E>                                          73,632,488
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,270,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,287,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,830,671
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         9,231,410
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,475,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,287,652
<SALES>                                        149,836,870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               149,836,870
<CGS>                                          108,875,514
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  108,875,514
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,320,387
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   187,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,407,239
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,046,730
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,623,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,423,730
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,423,730
<EPS-BASIC>                                           1.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.80



</TABLE>