alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Europos Sąjungos C 184A/2004

| | ISSN 1725-521X |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 184A |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir prane_imai | 47 tomas2004m. liepos 17d. |

ISSN 1725-521X

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 184A

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir prane_imai

47 tomas2004m. liepos 17d.

---

| Prane_imo Nr. | Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Pranešimai |
| | Taryba |
| 2004/C 184A/1 | | 1 |

Prane_imo Nr.

Turinys

Puslapis

III   Pranešimai

Taryba

2004/C 184A/1

1

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

III Pranešimai

Taryba

| 17.7.2004 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CA 184/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2004

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CA 184/1

---

PRANEŠIMAS DĖL LAISVOS VIETOS

(Ref. A/014)

GENERALINIS DIREKTORIUS

(2004/C 184 A/01)

Tarybos generalinis sekretoriatas skelbia konkursą generalinio direktoriaus postui užimti Generaliniame direktorate H – Teisingumas ir vidaus reikalai.

Daugiau informacijos (anglų ir prancūzų kalbomis) ir paraiškos formas galima gauti Atrankos ir įdarbinimo departamente el. paštu: service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int arba jo interneto puslapyje: http://ue.eu.int/concours.

Paraiškos pateikimo terminas: 2004 m. rugsėjo 3 d., paliudytas pašto antspaudu.

---
From: Robert Hurt [mailto:Bob.Hurt@Daltile.com]

Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 8:22 PM

To: Nizich, Sharon

Cc: gilberg@guidaslavichflores.com

Subject: Waiver of CBI Claim

Ms. Nizich,

As an authorized representative of Dal-Tile Corporation and Dal Italia LLC, I hereby waive the previous 

claims of Confidential Business Information for production related data listed in the files on the 2 CDs 

received today in correspondence from Mr. Keith Barnett dated 04/16/13 (see attached file).

This waiver is also intended to cover any/all previous CBI claims associated with stack testing reports 

submitted for the Dal-Tile facility located in El Paso, Texas and the Dal Italia facility in Muskogee, OK.

(See attached file: CBI Dal-Tile and Dal Italia_Barnett 04-16-2013.pdf)

Regards,

Robert (Bob) Hurt

Director - Environmental, Health & Safety

Dal-Tile Corporation

7834 CF Hawn Freeway

Dallas, TX 75217

office 214.309.4891

mobile 972.921.6062

e.mail bob.hurt@daltile.com

www.daltile.com/leed
§ 2570.166 Scope of discovery. For 502(c)(8) civil penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.14 of this title. ( a ) A party may file a motion to conduct discovery with the administrative law judge. The motion for discovery shall be granted by the administrative law judge only upon a showing of good cause. In order to establish “good cause” for the purposes of this section, a party must show that the discovery requested relates to a genuine issue as to a material fact that is relevant to the proceeding. The order of the administrative law judge shall expressly limit the scope and terms of discovery to that for which “good cause” has been shown, as provided in this paragraph.
( b ) A party may obtain discovery of documents and tangible things otherwise discoverable under paragraph (a) of this section and prepared in anticipation of or for the hearing by or for another party's representative (including his or her attorney, consultant, surety, indemnitor, insurer, or agent) only upon showing that the party seeking discovery has substantial need of the materials or information in the preparation of his or her case and that he or she is unable without undue hardship to obtain the substantial equivalent of the materials or information by other means. In ordering discovery of such materials when the required showing has been made, the administrative law judge shall protect against disclosure of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of an attorney or other representatives of a party concerning the proceeding.
# EUR-Lex - 32000R0635 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R0635

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 635/2000 of 24 March 2000 amending Regulation (EC) No 2571/97 on the sale of butter at reduced prices and the granting of aid for cream, butter and concentrated butter for use in the manufacture of pastry products, ice cream and other foodstuffs **

*
Official Journal L 076 , 25/03/2000 P. 0009 - 0009 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 635/2000

of 24 March 2000

amending Regulation (EC) No 2571/97 on the sale of butter at reduced prices and the granting of aid for cream, butter and concentrated butter for use in the manufacture of pastry products, ice cream and other foodstuffs

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products(1), and in particular Articles 10 and 15 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 3(a) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2571/97(2), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 494/1999(3), provides for the possibility of using the tracers referred to in Annex II to the Regulation in the products in question to permit checks on the final use to which they are put. In view of the fact that certain tracers have not been used under these arrangements for quite some time and that Annex II to the Regulation provides for alternative tracers, the tracers concerned should be deleted, thus permitting simplification of checks. Furthermore, the tracers in question are undergoing evaluation in the light of new scientific knowledge.

(2) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Point V of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 2571/97 is deleted.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 March 2000.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48.

(2) OJ L 350, 20.12.1997, p. 3.

(3) OJ L 59, 6.3.1999, p. 17.
§ 1603.207 Intervention. ( a ) Any person or entity that wishes to intervene in any proceeding under this subpart shall file a motion to intervene in accordance with § 1603.208.
( b ) A motion to intervene shall indicate the question of law or fact common to the movant's claim or defense and the complaint at issue and state all other relevant facts or reasons the movant should be permitted to intervene.
( c ) Any party may file a response to a motion to intervene within 10 business days after service of the motion to intervene.
[62 FR 17543, Apr. 10, 1997, as amended at 89 FR 47853, June 4, 2024]
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
  





 
 April 1, 2015 

The Coca-Cola Company, through its 

       Coca-Cola North America Division 

PO Box 1734 
 Atlanta, GA 30301 

Attn: Mr. Louis Martin, Senior Vice President System Evolution 

Dear Louis: 
 We refer you to the Agreement entered
into on December 17, 2014 (the “Agreement”) between Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated (“Bottler”) and The Coca-Cola Company through its Coca-Cola North America Division (“TCCC”) regarding certain payments to be
made by Bottler to TCCC for consent to Bottler’s distribution of Products of Monster Energy Corporation (“MEC”). Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the definitions ascribed in the Agreement. Notwithstanding any term in
the Agreement to the contrary, TCCC and Bottler agree that Bottler shall not be obligated to make the upfront payment described in paragraph A. of the section of the Agreement titled “Bottler Payment to Company for Distribution Rights”
until the later of (i) the Commencement Date or (ii) June 30, 2015 to allow for reconciliation of the number of SPCs sold in the Additional Territory for the twelve (12) months preceding the Commencement Date to enable
determination of the upfront payment. 
 Except as modified by the terms of this letter, all terms and conditions in the Agreement remain in full
force and effect. Please acknowledge TCCC’s agreement with the terms of this letter by signing below in the space provided. 
 Sincerely, 

 

	
	 /s/ Umesh Kasbekar

	 Umesh Kasbekar, SVP, Planning & Administration

	 Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated

	
	 Agreed and Acknowledged:

	
	 /s/ Louis Martin

	 Louis Martin, Senior Vice President System Evolution

	 The Coca-Cola Company, by and through

	 Its Coca-Cola North America Division


 4100 Coca-Cola Plaza, Charlotte, North Carolina 28211-3481         
(704) 557-4400          P.O. Box 31487, Charlotte, North Carolina 28231-1487 

www.cokeconsolidated.com
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-271-000]

Take notice that on May 5, 2000, Mississippi Canyon Gas Pipeline, LLC (MCGP) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, revised tariff sheets listed in Appendix A to the filing, to be effective June 1, 2000.

MCGP states that the purpose of this filing is to update MCGP's Original Volume No. 1 FERC Gas Tariff to reflect references of Interactive Internet Website.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​      ( print page 31157)    online.rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-12230  Filed 5-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Motion of the Consolidated Carriers to Exclude Data of Peninsula Airways
#### § 2700.2 Definitions.

For purposes of this part, the definitions contained in section 3 of the Act, 30 U.S.C. 802, apply.
```

[Federal Register: June 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 104)]
[Notices]               
[Page 30385-30386]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01jn10-53]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DOD-2010-OS-0034]

 
Defense Transportation Regulation, Part IV

AGENCY: United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM), DoD.

ACTION: Notice; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD extends the public comment period of a notice concerning 
the Defense Personal Property Program (DP3) Phase III Final-Draft 
Business Rules. DoD has received a request to extend the comment period 
beyond its current 60-day comment period. Upon considering this 
request, DoD extends the comment deadline for an additional 30 days: 
From June 1, 2010, to July 1, 2010. No further extensions will be 
considered due to the timelines associated with funding and programming 
future Phase III capabilities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 1, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Do not submit comments directly to the point of contact 
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or mail your comments to any 
address other than what is shown below. Doing so will delay the posting 
of the submission. Request comments be submitted in the identified 
matrix-format posted with the business rules. You may submit comments, 
identified by docket number and title, by any of the following methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160 Defense 
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jim Teague, United States 
Transportation Command, TCJ5/4-PI, 508 Scott Drive, Scott Air Force 
Base, IL 62225-5357; (618) 229-1985.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice concerning the Defense Personal 
Property Program (DP3) Phase III Final-

[[Page 30386]]

Draft Business Rules was published on April 1, 2010 (75 FR 16445), with 
a comment period ending date of June 1, 2010. After receiving a request 
to extend the comment period, DoD has decided to extend it for an 
additional 30 days through July 1, 2010. No further extensions will be 
considered due to the timelines associated with funding and programming 
future Phase III capabilities.

    Dated: May 26, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-12999 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
RE: Requested Materials - Capacity Factor Information 

 Higgins, Cortney 

 to: RobertJ Wayland 

 11/22/2011 03:43 PM 

 Cc: Bill Maxwell 

Hi Bob, 

Thanks. I've looked through my files and can't find the area source 

list/sheet -- can you resend? 

Thanks, 

Cortney 

-----Original Message----- 

From: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov 

[mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 3:48 PM 

To: Higgins, Cortney 

Cc: Maxwell.Bill@epamail.epa.gov 

Subject: Requested Materials - Capacity Factor Information 

Cortney - 

This is the first of five emails providing some of the information you 

requested last week. To try and reduce confusion, I am not resubmitting 

the area source information because nothing has changed on this issue 

since the two files we provided at proposal. If you can't find that 

information, just let me know and I'll resubmit that information to you 

as well. Call either Bill or me if you have any questions. 

thanx! 

bob 

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. 

Leader, Energy Strategies Group 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs 

Division Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-1045 

Cell: (919) 306-2290 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov 

********************************************************* 

DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

********************************************************* 

(See attached file: Oil Boilers_cap factor_102811.xlsx) 

(See attached file: Coal_Boilers_cap factor_111711.xlsx)
[Nos. 26517-6-II; 26523-1-II.

Division Two.

December 31, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Rodney D. Clark, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court for Jefferson County, No. 00-1-00041-9, William E. Howard, J. Pro Tern., entered October 5, 2000. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, A.C.J., concurred in by Seinfeld and Bridgewater, JJ.
#### KENTON SAVINGS BK & TRUST CO v SMICK etc

Ohio Appeals, 3rd Dist, Hardin Co

No. 216.

Decided January 6, 1930

Mr. C. W. Faulkner, Kenton, for Savings Bk & Trust Co.

Messrs. John H. Smick and Price & Price, Kenton for Smick etc .

HUGHES, J.

The position taken by defendant is that it had no knowledge of the insolvency of the bankrupt at the time judgment was entered on its note. And that if this be true, the advantage procured by the levy and sale of the property thereafter, would not avoid the preference procured thereby.

It is .conceded in argument that if the defendant had knowledge of the insolvency of the bankrupt at the time this judgment was procured, and knew that by the steps contemplated thereunder it would receive ,a preference over other creditors, then under such circumstances the trustee would be entitled to recover.

The problems suggested: i. e., “that if the defendant had no knowledge of the insolvency of the bankrupt at the time its judgment was taken, then the after-procedings resulting in the sale and procurement of the proceeds of sale on its claim, cannot be avoided”, is not necessary or important to discuss because there was evidence submitted to the court upon the issue of fact as to whether or not the defendant had knowledge of the insolvency of the bankrupt before taking judgment, and was found in favor of the plaintiff.

The case of Dean v. King, 22 OS. 118, 134, applies clearly to this case because there is a square conflict touching this *157issue of fact, and a reviewing court is not at liberty to disturb a finding under such circumstances.

The witness for the plaintiff testifies positively that about two months before the sale of the property, he informed the defendant through its president, of the insolvent condition of the bankrupt and his effort to induce a creditor to put him into involuntary bankruptcy. The witness for the defendant admits having such a conversation, but says that it was about the time the property was being sold on execution. At page 26 of the record, a question was asked this witness, whether any knowledge came to him which would lead him to believe that the bankrupt was insolvent, to which objection was made and sustained and exceptions saved. But the record does not contain any offered proof, and hence we are not informed what the testimony would have been had it been received, and no error can be founded upon this exception. Motor Corporation v. Winter, 118 OS. 622.

Under these circumstances, it is clear that the judgment must be affirmed.

Before Judges Hughes, Justice and Crow.
#### KIRBY v HASER, et

Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist., Summit Co.

No. 1737.

Decided May 21, 1930

Commins, Brouse, Englebeck & McDowell, Akron, and Robert S. Dechant, Lebanon, for Kirby.

McCuskey, Cotton & Short, Cuyahoga Falls, for Haser, et.

*448PER CURIAM

We think that by the aforementioned writing there was granted to the owner of the premises now owned by the plaintiff, and his heirs, a perpetual right to conduct the water from said spring to the premises now owned by the plaintiff; that said right is not a personal right but is appurtenant to and passes with said premises, and that said right has been continuously exercised by the owners of said premises since that time, and that said grant being in the chain of title of the defendants and being especially excepted from the grant of defendants’ premises in the conveyance made of the same by the grantor who granted said rights in said spring, constituted notice t'o the defendants and that they are charged with knowledge of the rights of plaintiff in said spring and that the defendants have no right to interfere with the plaintiff in the exercise of said rights.

We are not impressed with the claim that the parties did not intend by said writing to grant the right to take said water by the method and means employed for the last forty years and use the same as it has been used during said time. We think the method of conveyance and the use made of said water is not substantially different than that intended by the parties, and it is apparent to iis that the plaintiff does not have an adequate remedy at law.

A decree may be entered for the plaintiff, enjoining the defendants from interfering with said spring and with plaintiff’s right to conduct water from said spring to plaintiff’s property by the method and means in use at the time defendants took possession of their premises, and from interfering with the plaintiff going upon the property of the defendants ;at all reasonable times to repair and maintain said spring and said pipes in a proper condition to enjoy the grant to' use said spring water as it has been used during the last forty years.

FUNK, P.J., PARDEE, . J., and WASH-BURN, J., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    
    /s/ John B. Gerlach, Jr.John B. Gerlach, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerSeptember 7, 2006By:
    
    /s/ John L. BoylanJohn L. BoylanChief Financial OfficerSeptember 7, 2006
#### § 2580.412-28 Conditions of exemption.

This exemption applies only to those banking institutions and trust companies subject to regulation and examination by the Comptroller of the Currency or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.