alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Financial Statements contained in Item 1 of Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
Figures are rounded to the nearest 100,000 (except EPS).
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         19,200
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 201,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                   128,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              376,800
<PP&E>                                        863,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                542,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                777,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         202,100
<BONDS>                                        81,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       23,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    423,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  777,700
<SALES>                                       694,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              694,800
<CGS>                                         499,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 499,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              137,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              4,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                58,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                   19,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            38,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   38,500
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.67




</TABLE>
#### HAUSE, Admr v THOMPSON

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist, Fulton Co

No 104.

Decided Oct 28, 1929

Paxson & Canfield, Wauseon, for Hause.

Ward & Johnson, Wauseon, for Thompson.

WILLIAMS, J.

The first ^claim made is that the plaintiff was permitted to testify to facts prior to the death of the decedent. An examination of the record shows that the contention of plaintiff in error is well founded. Upon direct examination, in reply to *272counsel, plaintiff testified to facts or transactions prior to the death of the decedent, over the obection of the. defendant below. This constituted error.

It is also claimed that the court erred in its charge to the jury and the part of the charge claimed to be erroneous is that which relates to the measure of damages. We are also satisfied that this contention is well founded.

The testimony utterly • fails to bring out the .amount of the estate decedent left after the deduction of debts, and also fails to disclose the health or age or expectancy of life of the sister, who is still living.’ We also call, attention to the fact that under this contract the plaintiff obligated herself to “satisfactorily care for the said employer and his sister for the remainder of their lifetimes”. If the persons to be cared'for were in good faith dissatisfied with the services rendered, and the services of plaintiff were discontinued for that reason, there could be no recovery.

As to the question whether the verdict was excessive, it is utterly impossible to determine from the evidence adduced as to damage, what plaintiff ought or ought not to recover.

As such error of the court below was prejudicial to the plaintiff in error, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded for new trial.

Lloyd and Richards, JJ., concur.
#### Leon D. PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. A. L. DUTTON, Warden, Georgia State Prison, Reidsville, Georgia, Appellee.

No. 24208.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 15, 1967.

Thomas F. Walsh, Savannah, Ga., for appellant.

Mathew Robins, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., G. Ernest Tidwell, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before COLEMAN and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges, and CARS-WELL, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted in the Fulton County, Georgia, Superior Court of larceny from the house and sentenced on March 8, 1960 to a term of eight years. On August 4, 1960, he left the penitentiary and was not returned until December 2, 1965. Prior to filing the present petition, a similar petition for habeas corpus was filed in the Reidsville, Georgia, City Court and denied. He testified that on August 4, 1960, while then serving his sentence, he was sent to the Battey State Hospital, Prison Branch, in Rome, Georgia, and was told by the Warden that he was released. The official records of the Georgia State Prison, testified to by Charles R. Balkeom, show that he escaped from incarceration on that date and was not returned until December 2, 1965 when custody was secured from the Florida State Prison where he had most recently been serving a five-year sentence. The Georgia prison records disclose no evidence of a release such as appellant asserts.

Appellant contends that having been sentenced on March 8, 1960 to eight years’ imprisonment, his normal release date would be March 1968 and under allowances for statutory good time he is now eligible for release. However, he has not carried the burdei^of proving his allegations by a preponderance of the evidence (see Williams v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1965, 354 F.2d 698), nor are we convinced that the findings of the district court on conflicting evidence should be disturbed since they are not clearly erroneous. In fact, we agree with them. See Post v. Boles, 4 Cir., 1964, 332 F.2d 738, cert. den. 380 U.S. 981, 85 S.Ct. 1346, 14 L.Ed.2d 274 (1965).

We hold, therefore, that the writ was properly denied because appellant’s Georgia state sentence was tolled by his escape and the time of his imprisonment did not again begin to run until his return to the Georgia State Prison on December 2, 1965. Obviously, he has not yet served his eight-year sentence.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     The undersigned  executive  officers of the Registrant  hereby certify that
this Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  and the  information  contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.


                                    By: /s/  James C. McGill
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Name:  James C. McGill
                                        Title: President and Chief
                                                  Executive Officer



                                    By: /s/  A. Christine Baker
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Name:   A. Christine Baker
                                        Title:  Secretary, Treasurer and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

Date: February 14, 2003
# Europeiska unionens C 171/1 ju

| | ISSN 1725-2504 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 171 |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 47 årgången1 juli 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2504

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 171

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

47 årgången1 juli 2004

---

| Informationsnummer | Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Meddelanden |
| | Kommissionen |
| 2004/C 171/1 | Eurons växelkurs | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

I   Meddelanden

Kommissionen

2004/C 171/1

Eurons växelkurs

1

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

I Meddelanden

Kommissionen

| 1.7.2004 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | C 171/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2004

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

C 171/1

---

Eurons växelkurs (1)

30 juni 2004

(2004/C 171/01)

1 Euro=

| | Valuta | Kurs |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US-dollar | 1,2155 |
| JPY | japansk yen | 132,40 |
| DKK | dansk krona | 7,4326 |
| GBP | pund sterling | 0,67075 |
| SEK | svensk krona | 9,1451 |
| CHF | schweizisk franc | 1,5242 |
| ISK | isländsk krona | 88,33 |
| NOK | norsk krona | 8,4365 |
| BGN | bulgarisk lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | cypriotiskt pund | 0,58150 |
| CZK | tjeckisk koruna | 31,755 |
| EEK | estnisk krona | 15,6466 |
| HUF | ungersk forint | 251,60 |
| LTL | litauisk litas | 3,4529 |
| LVL | lettisk lats | 0,6570 |
| MTL | maltesisk lira | 0,4263 |
| PLN | polsk zloty | 4,5236 |
| ROL | rumänsk leu | 40 626 |
| SIT | slovensk tolar | 239,9900 |
| SKK | slovakisk koruna | 39,875 |
| TRL | turkisk lira | 1 805 300 |
| AUD | australisk dollar | 1,7554 |
| CAD | kanadensisk dollar | 1,6343 |
| HKD | Hongkongdollar | 9,4803 |
| NZD | nyzeeländsk dollar | 1,9210 |
| SGD | singaporiansk dollar | 2,0901 |
| KRW | sydkoreansk won | 1 404,45 |
| ZAR | sydafrikansk rand | 7,6177 |

Valuta

Kurs

USD

US-dollar

1,2155

JPY

japansk yen

132,40

DKK

dansk krona

7,4326

GBP

pund sterling

0,67075

SEK

svensk krona

9,1451

CHF

schweizisk franc

1,5242

ISK

isländsk krona

88,33

NOK

norsk krona

8,4365

BGN

bulgarisk lev

1,9559

CYP

cypriotiskt pund

0,58150

CZK

tjeckisk koruna

31,755

EEK

estnisk krona

15,6466

HUF

ungersk forint

251,60

LTL

litauisk litas

3,4529

LVL

lettisk lats

0,6570

MTL

maltesisk lira

0,4263

PLN

polsk zloty

4,5236

ROL

rumänsk leu

40 626

SIT

slovensk tolar

239,9900

SKK

slovakisk koruna

39,875

TRL

turkisk lira

1 805 300

AUD

australisk dollar

1,7554

CAD

kanadensisk dollar

1,6343

HKD

Hongkongdollar

9,4803

NZD

nyzeeländsk dollar

1,9210

SGD

singaporiansk dollar

2,0901

KRW

sydkoreansk won

1 404,45

ZAR

sydafrikansk rand

7,6177

---

(1)

Källa: Referensväxelkurs offentliggjord av Europeiska centralbanken.

---
#### MARYLAND CASUALTY CO v ST CLAIR

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 10879.

Decided Oct. 27, 1930

Mooney, Hahn, Loeser, Keough & Beam, Cleveland, for Casualty Co.

Walter L. Krewson, Cleveland, for St. Clair.

Judges WILLIAMS and RICHARDS (6th Dist) and JUSTICE (3rd Dist) sitting.

*742RICHARDS, J.

We think the great weight of the evidence shows that the contract amounted to an agreement to compound a felony. Under such circumtsances the court will not give relief to a plaintiff but will leave the parties where it finds them. We find no other error in the record, but for the reason that the judgment is manifestly against the weight of the evidence, it will be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Williams and Justice, JJ, concur.
#### § 21.119 Research undertaken without the intention of involving human subjects.

Except for research waived under § 21.101(i) or exempted under § 21.104, in the event research is undertaken without the intention of involving human subjects, but it is later proposed to involve human subjects in the research, the research shall first be reviewed and approved by an IRB, as provided in this policy, a certification submitted by the institution to the Federal department or agency component supporting the research, and final approval given to the proposed change by the Federal department or agency component.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Charles H. Stoll et al., as Executors and Trustees under the Will of Antonin Chapal, Deceased. Charles H. Stoll, as Successor Trustee, etc., Appellant; Claudia Chapal et al., Respondents.

Submitted April 26, 1937;

decided April 30, 1937.

*Edward B. SchulJdnd*for motion.

*Charles H. Stoll*opposed.

Motion denied, with leave to renew on argument of appeal.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 AND 15d-14
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

I, Lawrence M. Davis, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Registrant, Crdentia Corp., certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Crdentia Corp.;



2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and we have:



(a) 	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



(b) 	evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and



(c) 	disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) 	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) 	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: August 8, 2003
§ 1472.510 What actions will the Federal Government take against a recipient determined to have violated this part? If a recipient is determined to have violated this part, as described in § 1472.500 or § 1472.505, the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service may take one or more of the following actions— ( a ) Suspension of payments under the award;
( b ) Suspension or termination of the award; and
( c ) Suspension or debarment of the recipient under 29 CFR part 1471, for a period not to exceed five years.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 3, 2018

s1218 

# Order

Clerk January 3, 2018

156176

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156176

COA: 338059

Oakland CC: 2016

- 259000

- FH

HASSAN ABDULNABI BAZZI,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 1, 2017 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# EUR-Lex - 32000R2363 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R2363

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2363/2000 of 25 October 2000 establishing the forecast supply balances for cereal products and dried fodder for the smaller Aegean islands for 2000 and amending Regulation (EC) No 3175/94 laying down detailed rules of application for the specific supply arrangements **

*
Official Journal L 273 , 26/10/2000 P. 0003 - 0004 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 2363/2000

of 25 October 2000

establishing the forecast supply balances for cereal products and dried fodder for the smaller Aegean islands for 2000 and amending Regulation (EC) No 3175/94 laying down detailed rules of application for the specific supply arrangements

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2019/93 of 19 July 1993 introducing specific measures for the smaller Aegean islands concerning certain agricultural products(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999(2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2958/93(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1802/95(4), lays down the common detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 2019/93 as regards the specific arrangements for the supply of certain agricultural products to smaller Aegean islands, and pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 2019/93, the amount of aid for this supply.

(2) For the purposes of applying Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 2019/93, Commission Regulation (EC) No 3175/94(5), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2682/1999(6), establishes for 2000 the forecast supply balances for cereals and dried fodder. To meet the needs of this region, amendments must be made to this forecast supply balance. Regulation (EC) No 3175/94 should therefore be amended.

(3) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Joint Committee of the relevant management committees,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex to Regulation (EC) No 3175/94 is hereby replaced by the Annex to the present Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 1 January 2000.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 October 2000.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 184, 27.7.1993, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 80.

(3) OJ L 267, 28.10.1993, p. 4.

(4) OJ L 174, 26.7.1995, p. 27.

(5) OJ L 335, 23.12.1994, p. 54.

(6) OJ L 326, 18.12.1999, p. 20.

ANNEX

"ANNEX

Forecast supply balance for cereal products and dried fodder for the smaller Aegean islands for 2000

>TABLE>

Groups A and B are defined in Annexes I and II to Regulation (EEC) No 2958/93."
# EUR-Lex - 32000F0712(02) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000F0712(02)

**Council Act of 29 May 2000 establishing in accordance with Article 34 of the Treaty on European Union the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union **

*
Official Journal 197 , 12/07/2000 P. 0001 - 0002 *

Council Act

of 29 May 2000

establishing in accordance with Article 34 of the Treaty on European Union the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union

(2000/C 197/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 31(a) and 34(2)(d) thereof,

Having regard to the initiative of the Member States,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(1),

Whereas:

(1) For the purposes of achieving the objectives of the Union the rules on mutual assitance in criminal matters between the Member States of the European Union should be improved and a Convention, as set out in the Annex hereto, should be established to that end.

(2) Some of the provisions of the Convention fall within the scope of Article 1 of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the association of those two States with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis(2).

(3) This is the case with Articles 3, 5, 6, 7, 12 and 23, and, to the extent relevant to Article 12, with Articles 15 and 16, and, to the extent relevant to the Articles referred to, with Article 1.

(4) The procedures set out in the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union with the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters' association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis(3) have been observed in respect of these provisions.

(5) When the adoption of this Act is notified to the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway in accordance with Article 8(2)(a) of the aforementioned Agreement, those two States will be informed in particular of the contents of Article 29 on entry into force for Iceland and Norway and will be invited to submit, at the time they inform the Council and the Commission of the fulfilment of their constitutional requirements, the relevant statements under Article 24 of the Convention,

HAS DECIDED that the Convention, the text of which is given in the Annex and which has been signed today by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the Union, is hereby established,

RECOMMENDS that it be adopted by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements,

INVITES the Member States to begin the procedures applicable for that purpose before 1 January 2001.

Done at Brussels, 29 May 2000.

For the Council

The President

A. Costa

(1) Opinion delivered on 17 February 2000 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(2) OJ L 176, 10.7.1999, p. 31.

(3) OJ L 176, 10.7.1999, p. 36.