alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CLEVELAND SOUTHWESTERN RY & LT CO v BRIGGS

Ohio Appeals, 3rd Dist, Crawford Co

No 1234.

Decided March 19, 1930

J. W. McCarron, Cleveland, and Clarence V. Ahl, Bucyrus, for Ry Co.

Edward J. Myers, Bucyrus, and Meek & Meek, Toledo, for Briggs.

*303HUGHES, J.

The first assignment of error is that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence.

We are not able to say that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence regarding the negligence of the defendant, but regarding the negligence of the plaintiff, we conclude that it is against the weight of the evidence.

The fourth special request to charge the jury before argument, was refused, and, in our judgment, correctly so because it stated to the jury that the plaintiff was required to operate his automobile equipped with lights so as to be able to see the condition of the highway ahead of him. There is no limitation as to the distance ahead of him that he should have been able to see,, and it was therefore too broad a statement.

At page 95, the court charged the jury . that it was the duty of the defendant to operate its car in such a way that persons in the exercise of reasonable care approaching this point would be warned of the approach of the car by the ringing of the bell, sounding of the whistle or other necessary signals, without qaulifying this statement by saying that if in the exercise of ordinary care a- ringing of a bell or a sounding of a whistle or some other signal would have been necessary. This omission made this portion of the charge erroneous.

At page 96, the court charged the jury that they might consider and allow the plaintiff, if they found in his favor, not only for the pain and suffering, but for the amount that he has paid or contracted to pay for medical services by reason of the injuries. There, is no-evidence in the record tending to prove that the plaintiff had paid or contracted to pay for medical services. It is true that he testifies that upon being injured, he was taken to á doctor’s office, and it is also true that the doctor testified that he was brought to his officé and that he took care of his injuries, . but there is nothing in the record that shows that these services of the doctor were performed for and charged to the plaintiff. For all that the record discloses these services may have been contracted for by the defendant company and paid by it. Therefore, the case does not fall within the principles of law laid down in the 62 OS. 139, as-though the doctor had been suing for his compensation.

Under such circumstances, there was error in giving this instruction.

For the reasons above given, the judgment is reversed.

Before Judges Hughes, Justice & Crow.
# Europos Sąjungos C 171/2004

| | ISSN 1725-521X |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 171 |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir prane_imai | 47 tomas2004m. liepos 1d. |

ISSN 1725-521X

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 171

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir prane_imai

47 tomas2004m. liepos 1d.

---

| Prane_imo Nr. | Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Informacija |
| | Komisija |
| 2004/C 171/1 | Euro kursas | 1 |

Prane_imo Nr.

Turinys

Puslapis

I   Informacija

Komisija

2004/C 171/1

Euro kursas

1

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

I Informacija

Komisija

| 1.7.2004 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | C 171/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2004

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

C 171/1

---

Euro kursas (1)

2004 m. birželio 30 d.

(2004/C 171/01)

1 euras=

| | Valiuta | Valiutos kursas |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | JAV doleris | 1,2155 |
| JPY | Japonijos jena | 132,40 |
| DKK | Danijos krona | 7,4326 |
| GBP | Svaras šterlingas | 0,67075 |
| SEK | Švedijos krona | 9,1451 |
| CHF | Šveicarijos frankas | 1,5242 |
| ISK | Islandijos krona | 88,33 |
| NOK | Norvegijos krona | 8,4365 |
| BGN | Bulgarijos levas | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Kipro svaras | 0,58150 |
| CZK | Čekijos krona | 31,755 |
| EEK | Estijos kronos | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Vengrijos forintas | 251,60 |
| LTL | Lietuvos litas | 3,4529 |
| LVL | Latvijos latas | 0,6570 |
| MTL | Maltos lira | 0,4263 |
| PLN | Lenkijos zlotas | 4,5236 |
| ROL | Rumunijos lėja | 40 626 |
| SIT | Slovėnijos tolaras | 239,9900 |
| SKK | Slovakijos krona | 39,875 |
| TRL | Turkijos lira | 1 805 300 |
| AUD | Australijos doleris | 1,7554 |
| CAD | Kanados doleris | 1,6343 |
| HKD | Honkongo doleris | 9,4803 |
| NZD | Naujosios Zelandijos doleris | 1,9210 |
| SGD | Singapūro doleris | 2,0901 |
| KRW | Pietų Korėjos vonas | 1 404,45 |
| ZAR | Pietų Afrikos randas | 7,6177 |

Valiuta

Valiutos kursas

USD

JAV doleris

1,2155

JPY

Japonijos jena

132,40

DKK

Danijos krona

7,4326

GBP

Svaras šterlingas

0,67075

SEK

Švedijos krona

9,1451

CHF

Šveicarijos frankas

1,5242

ISK

Islandijos krona

88,33

NOK

Norvegijos krona

8,4365

BGN

Bulgarijos levas

1,9559

CYP

Kipro svaras

0,58150

CZK

Čekijos krona

31,755

EEK

Estijos kronos

15,6466

HUF

Vengrijos forintas

251,60

LTL

Lietuvos litas

3,4529

LVL

Latvijos latas

0,6570

MTL

Maltos lira

0,4263

PLN

Lenkijos zlotas

4,5236

ROL

Rumunijos lėja

40 626

SIT

Slovėnijos tolaras

239,9900

SKK

Slovakijos krona

39,875

TRL

Turkijos lira

1 805 300

AUD

Australijos doleris

1,7554

CAD

Kanados doleris

1,6343

HKD

Honkongo doleris

9,4803

NZD

Naujosios Zelandijos doleris

1,9210

SGD

Singapūro doleris

2,0901

KRW

Pietų Korėjos vonas

1 404,45

ZAR

Pietų Afrikos randas

7,6177

---

(1)

Šaltinis: valiutų perskaičiavimo kursai paskelbti ECB.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                            366,054
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   6,901,961
<ALLOWANCES>                                      200,000
<INVENTORY>                                    21,783,066
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               28,864,463
<PP&E>                                          1,039,934
<DEPRECIATION>                                    581,504
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 29,322,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           5,169,210
<BONDS>                                        20,725,565
<COMMON>                                           88,741
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      3,339,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   29,332,894
<SALES>                                        13,851,673
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               14,667,652
<CGS>                                          11,732,090
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  13,746,546
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                547,896
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   921,106
<INCOME-TAX>                                      620,050
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               301,056
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      301,056
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .34
        




</TABLE>
3850 Three Mile Lane • McMinnville, Oregon 97128 • USA

Phone (503) 472‐0011 • Fax (503) 434‐5913 • SITA: HDQMCEZ

U.S. Department of Transportation  

Docket Management System  

Docket No. FAA-2012-1240 

November 14, 2012  

Attachment  

SUMMARY OF ATA PETITION

Evergreen International Airlines, as a prior Airlines for America member and similarly situated Part

121 operator, petitions for an Exemption from 14 CFR 121.652(a) and (c). This exemption permits a

pilot in command under Part 121 to conduct an instrument approach procedure to the weather

minima prescribed by this exemption during the first 100 hours of service as a pilot in command, in

the type of airplane he or she is operating, using an alternative means approved by the

Administrator of satisfying 14 CFR §121.652(a) and (c), subject to certain conditions and limitations.
§ 22.41 Stay pending appeal. ( a ) An initial decision is stayed automatically pending disposition of a motion for reconsideration or of an appeal to the ARB.
( b ) No administrative stay is available following a final decision of the authority head.
[52 FR 48492, Dec. 22, 1987, as amended at 86 FR 1782, Jan. 11, 2021]
§ 2580.412-2 Plans exempt from the coverage of section 13. Only completely unfunded plans in which the plan benefits derive solely from the general assets of a union[1] or employer, and in which plan assets are not segregated in any way from the general assets of a union or employer and remain solely within the general assets until the time of distribution of benefits, shall be exempt from the bonding provisions. As such, the language “where such plan is one under which the only assets from which benefits are paid are the general assets of a union or of an employer” shall not be deemed to exempt a plan from the coverage of section 13 if the plan is one in which: ( a ) Any benefits thereunder are provided or underwritten by an insurance carrier or service or other organization, or
( b ) There is a trust or other separate entity to which contributions are made or out of which benefits are paid, or
( c ) Contributions to the plan are made by the employees, either through withholding or otherwise, or from any source other than the employer or union involved, or
( d ) There is a separately maintained bank account or separately maintained books and records for the plan or other evidence of the existence of a segregrated or separately maintained or administered fund out of which plan benefits are to be provided.
As a general rule, the presence of special ledger accounts or accounting entries for plan funds as an integral part of the general books and records of an employer or union shall not, in and of itself, be deemed sufficient evidence of segregation of plan funds to take a plan out of the exempt category, but shall be considered along with the other factors and criteria discussed above in determining whether the exemption applies. Again, it should be noted, however, that the fact that a plan is not exempt from the coverage of section 13 does not necessarily mean that its administrators, officers or employees are required to be bonded. As stated previously, this will depend in each case on whether or not they “handle” funds or other property of the plan within the meaning of section 13 and under the standards set forth in § 2580.412-6. Footnotes -
2580.412-2
[1] For purposes of the exemption discussed in § 2580.412-2, the term “union” shall include “* * * any organization of any kind or any agency or employee representation committee, association, group, or plan, in which employees participate and which exists for the purpose in whole or in part, of dealing with employers concerning an employee welfare or pension benefit plan, or other matters incidental to employment relationships * * *” (29 U.S.C. 302(a)(3)).
#### HENRY STEIN v. MICHAEL ROELLER and Others.1

November 20, 1896.

Nos. 10,241 — (192).

Trial — Submission of Case — Reopening—Notice.

After a canse has been tried, argued, and submitted to the court for determination, it has no power upon its own motion, and without a hearing, to open the same, and, by mere verbal notice to the attorney of the party whose interests are to be affected, proceed to take further testimony on the issues involved.

Action in the district court for Hennepin county on a promissory note. Matthew Walsh, assignee, intervened as claimant of the note. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendants Roeller and another for $2,044.34, and against the intervenor for $18.03, entered in pursuance of the findings and order of Jamison, J., the intervenor appealed.

Reversed.

*G. G. Joslyn*and *Henry J. Gjertsen,*for appellant.

*George JD.*Emery, for respondent.

1

 Reported in 68 N. W. 1087.

COLLINS, J.

The principal question in this case was whether plaintiff was a bona fide purchaser for value, and before maturity,-of the note on which the action was brought, the trial being had before the court without a jury. The settled case shows that “testimony closed, whereupon the case was argued and submitted to the court, who took the same under advisement,” May 13, 1896. It further appears from the case as settled that, on May 21, the plaintiff and his attorney appeared before the court, no one appearing upon the other side, when the trial judge, after stating that he had told one of defendant’s attorneys, the day before, that on his own motion he would take plaintiff’s testimony that morning, proceeded to hear such testimony, all of which had a bearing upon the vital issue before mentioned. That the findings of fact in plaintiff’s favor upon this issue were influenced by the evidence taken is obvious.

The proceeding was exceedingly irregular. On its own motion, and *284without a bearing, tbe case was opened by. the court, verbal notice given that testimony would be taken, and evidence was received, ex parte, after there had been a submission of the cause to the court for decision. After such a submission, the case could not be opened for further proceedings except for good cause and upon formal notice to the party whose interests were being affected. Notices in civil proceedings are required to be in writing (G-. S. 1894, § 5213), and the method of service is prescribed in the sections following. The fact of notice in proceedings had in the courts cannot be allowed to rest in the uncertainty which would prevail if the practice here relied on were tolerated. Of course, a different case would be before us if the intervenor or defendant or the attorney of either had appeared in response to the verbal notice, and without objection had taken part in the examination of the plaintiff witness.

Findings and judgment set aside, and a new trial granted.
Searched for **http://www.peacecorps.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.peacecorps.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### EYLER v ANDERSON, etc

Ohio Supreme Court

No 22140.

Decided April 2, 1930
#### § 1472.645 Federal agency or agency.

*Federal agency or agency* means any United States executive department, military department, government corporation, government controlled corporation, any other establishment in the executive branch (including the Executive Office of the President), or any independent regulatory agency.
#### ZIMANSKI v CURRO & WHITTAKER CO

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No. 9833.

Decided November 11, 1929

Messrs. Anderson & Lamb, Cleveland, for Zimanski.

Mr. John H. McNeal, Esq., Cleveland, for Curro & Whittaker Co.

MIDDLETON, P. J. & MAUCK, J. (4th Dist) ,and HOUCK, J. (5th Dist) sitting

(See also Zimanski v Curro & Whittaker Co., 6 Abs. 117.)

MAUCK, J.

We now hold that the law of this case was determined by the Court of Appeals in the former hearing in this court and that following the rule in such cases we are bound to reverse the judgment complained of in this proceeding. Cohman vs. City of St. Bernard, 111 OS. 726. We may add that while this judgment is entered pursuant to the rule imposed upon us by the Cohman case, we are none the less of the independent opinion that such a case of negligence had been shown that its submission to the jury was required.

Middleton, P. J. and Houck, J., concur.
#### § 1990.105 Advisory committees.

The Secretary may appoint an Advisory Committee, pursuant to sections 6(b) and 7 of the Act, and 29 CFR part 1912, concerning any potential occupational carcinogen. The Secretary shall require the Advisory Committee to submit its recommendations to assist the Secretary in standard setting no later than ninety (90) days from the date of the Advisory Committee's appointment, unless extended by the Secretary for exceptional circumstances. If an Advisory Committee fails to file a timely report, the Secretary may proceed in standard setting activities without such a report.
§ 2400.9 Schedule of fees. ( a ) *Policy.* The purpose of this section is to establish fair and equitable fees to permit reproduction of personal records for concerned individuals.
( b ) *Reproduction.* ( 1 ) For the fees associated with reproduction of personal records, refer to appendix A to part 2201, Schedule of Fees.
( 2 ) OSHRC shall not normally furnish more than one copy of any record.
( c ) *Limitations.* No fee shall be charged to any individual for the process of retrieving, reviewing, or amending personal records.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than June 5, 2000. 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis**                     (Randall C. Sumner, Vice President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:                 

*1. Ann Doolin Adcock,*                     Dumas, Arkansas; to acquire additional voting shares of M & F Financial Corporation, Dumas, Arkansas, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of Merchants and Farmers Bank, Dumas, Arkansas.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 16, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 00-12707 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
### U n i te d S t a te s En v i r o n me n t a l P r o t ect i o n A g e n c y

El ectr o n i c D o c k e t I nd e x f o r

[ E P A -R 09

- O A R

- 2013

- 0 094 ]

Re v i s i o n o f A i r Q u a l i t y I m p l e me n t a t i o n P l a n ; C a li f o r n i a ;

P l a c er C o un t y A i r P o l l u t i o n C o n tr o l D i s tr i ct a nd

F e a t h er R i v er A i r Q u a l i t y M a n ag e m e n t D i s t r i c t;

S t a t i o n a r y S o u rce P e r m i t s

D o c k et I nd ex

C a te go r y /

I te m N u m b er

I. S I P Su b m i t t a l D o cu m en ts

ß S I P s ub m itt a l l e t t e r fr o m CARB , da t ed N o v e m be r 18, 2011 ( P l a c e r) I- A

ß S I P s ub m itt a l l e t t e r fr o m CARB , da t ed S ep t e m be r 21, 2012 ( F ea t

he r R i v e r ) I- B

ß R u l e 50 2 a m ended on O c t o be r 13

, 201 1 I- C

ß R u l e 10

. 1 a m ended on F eb r ua r y 6, 2012 I- D

ß P CA P CD , S t a ff R epo r t f o r P r opo s ed A m end m en t o f R u l e 50 2

, N

e w So u r ce R ev i ew ;

unda t e d I- E

ß F RAQ M D , S t a f

f R ep o rt f o r P r opo s ed A m end m en t s : R e g u l a t i on X R u l e 10.1, N

e w

Sou r c e R e v i ew ; und a t e d I- F

II

. F e d er a l R e g i s t er N o t i c e s

ß 57 F R

13498 ( A p r il 1 6, 1 9 92 ) G en e r a l P r ea m b l e f o r T i t l e I – 1990 A m en d m en t s I I

- A

ß 70 F R

39413 ( J u l y

8, 2005 ) I I

- B

ß 73 F R

2832 1 (M a y

16, 2 00 8 ) I m

p l e m en t a t i on o f N S R f

o r P M 2 .5 I I

- C

ß 76 F R

28944 ( M a y

19, 20 1 1 ) N P R M R

u l e s 5 02 an d

1 0 .1 I I

- D

ß 76 F R

44809 ( J u l y

27, 20 1 1 ) N F R M R

u l e s 5 02 an d

1 0 .1 I I

- E

III

. Ot h e r R e l eva n t D oc u m e n ts

ß T e chn i c a l Supp o rt D o cu m en t f o r P CA P CD R

u l e 5 02, da t e d

Fe b r ua r y 8, 2 0 1 3 I I I- A

ß T e chn i c a l Supp o rt D o cu m en t f o r P CA P CD R

u l e s 214 & 217, da t ed M a y 6, 201 1 I I I- B

ß T e chn i c a l Supp o rt D o cu m en t f o r F RAQ M D R

u l e 10.1

, da t e d Fe b r

u a r y 8, 201 3 I I I- C

ß T e chn i c a l Supp o rt D o cu m en t f o r F RAQ M D R

u l e 10.1

, da t e d M a y

9, 20 11 I I I- D

I V

. E P A R u l e m a k

i ng D oc u m en ts

ß Fede r a l R e g i s t e r N o t i ce o f P r opo s ed R u l e m a k i n g da t ed Feb r

u a r y 22, 20 1 3

ß R e s e r v ed F R N F R M

N o t e s:
**Exhibit 21****LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES****SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**         **State of****                            Name** **Segment** **Incorporation**Dee Zee, Inc. Automotive OhioE. O. Brody Company Glassware & Candles OhioIndiana Glass Company Glassware & Candles IndianaJackson Plastics Operations, Inc.* Glassware & Candles OhioLancaster Colony Commercial Products, Inc. Glassware & Candles OhioT. Marzetti Company Specialty Foods OhioMarzetti Frozen Pasta, Inc. (FKA Reames Foods, Inc.)* Specialty Foods IowaNew York Frozen Foods, Inc.* Specialty Foods OhioSister Schubert’s Homemade Rolls, Inc.* Specialty Foods AlabamaThe Quality Bakery Company, Inc.* Specialty Foods Ohio All subsidiaries conduct their business under the names shown. * Indicates indirect subsidiary
68