alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INTREPID CAPITAL CORPORATION FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         510,680
<SECURITIES>                                 2,121,561
<RECEIVABLES>                                  298,118
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    103,122
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,083,594
<PP&E>                                         146,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                (111,012)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,277,725
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,280,991
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,155
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,413,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,277,725
<SALES>                                        732,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,488,522
<CGS>                                          299,871
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,363,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                92,630
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,739
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                125,311
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   125,311
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05


</TABLE>
§ 2570.155 Service. For section 3(40) proceedings, this section shall apply instead of 29 CFR 18.3. ( a ) *In general.* Copies of all documents shall be served on all parties of record. All documents should clearly designate the docket number, if any, and short title of all matters. All documents to be filed shall be delivered or mailed to the Chief Docket Clerk, Office of Administrative Law Judges (OALJ), 800 K Street, NW., Suite 400, Washington, DC 20001-8002, or to the OALJ Regional Office to which the proceeding may have been transferred for hearing. Each document filed shall be clear and legible.
( b ) *By parties.* All motions, petitions, pleadings, briefs, or other documents shall be filed with the Office of Administrative Law Judges with a copy, including any attachments, to all other parties of record. When a party is represented by an attorney, service shall be made upon the attorney. Service of any document upon any party may be made by personal delivery or by mailing by first class, prepaid U.S. mail, a copy to the last known address. The Secretary shall be served by delivery to the Associate Solicitor, Plan Benefits Security Division, ERISA Section 3(40) Proceeding, PO Box 1914, Washington, DC 20013. The person serving the document shall certify to the manner and date of service.
( c ) *By the Office of Administrative Law Judges.* Service of orders, decisions and all other documents shall be made to all parties of record by regular mail to their last known address.
( d ) *Form of pleadings* ( 1 ) Every pleading shall contain information indicating the name of the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) as the agency under which the proceeding is instituted, the title of the proceeding, the docket number (if any) assigned by the OALJ and a designation of the type of pleading or paper (e.g., notice, motion to dismiss, etc.). The pleading or paper shall be signed and shall contain the address and telephone number of the party or person representing the party. Although there are no formal specifications for documents, they should be typewritten when possible on standard size 81 ⁄ 2 × 11 inch paper.
( 2 ) Illegible documents, whether handwritten, typewritten, photocopies, or otherwise, will not be accepted. Papers may be reproduced by any duplicating process provided all copies are clear and legible.
#### § 2520.101-4 [Reserved]
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT In re : PAM ELA R

AE B ENNETT, De btor.

______________________________ PAM ELA R

AE B ENNETT, Appe lla nt, v. LESLIE T. GLADSTONE, Truste e ; e t a l.,

Appe lle e s. No. 14-60018 B AP No. 13-1383 M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Ninth C irc uit B ankruptc y

Appe lla te Pane l Pa ppa s, Kurtz , a

nd Dunn, B ankruptc y

Judge s, Pre siding Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 18, 2017 ** B e fore : TR OTT, TASHIM A, a nd C ALLAHAN, C irc uit Judge s. 

# FIL ED JAN 31 2017 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Pam e la R a e B e nne tt a

p pe a ls pro se from

the B ankruptc y

Appe lla t e Pane l’ s (“ B AP” ) orde rs dismissing he r a ppe a l from

a ba nkruptc y c ourt’ s orde r and de ny ing B e nne tt’ s subse que nt m otion to re c onside r its dismissa l orde r. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 158(d). W e re vie w for an a buse of disc re tion the de nia l of a

m otion for re c onside ration. Arrow Ele c t ronic s, Inc . v . J

ustus (In re K ay pro) , 218 F.3d 1070, 1073 (9th C i r. 2000). W e a ffirm . The B AP did not a

buse its disc re tion in deny ing B e nne tt’ s m otion for re c o nside ration be c a

use B e nne tt fa ile d to show a ny ba sis for re lie f. Se e Fe d. R . C iv. P. 60(b) (e num e rat ing grounds for re lie f); N at’l Bank of Long Be ac h v . Donov an (In re D o nov a n) , 871 F.2d 807, 808 (9th C ir. 1989) (a B AP orde r de ny ing a m otion to re c onside r a

dism issa l for la c k of prose c ution “ is a ppropria t e ly ana logiz e d to a

R ule 60(b) de t e rm ination” ). W e la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r B e nne tt’ s c ha lle n ge s to the B AP’ s orde r dism issing he r a

p p e a l be c a

use B e nne tt fa ile d

to file a tim e ly notic e of a

ppe a l from that orde r. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 6(b)(2) (only tim e ly m o tions for re h e aring toll the tim e to a ppe a l the unde rly ing orde r or judgm e nt); Flore s v . Arizona , 516 F.3d 1140, 1163 (9th C ir. 2008) (a notic e of a

p p e a l tha t is tim e ly a s to a m otion for re he aring but untime ly

a s to theunde rly ing judgm e nt c onfe rs a ppe lla t e jurisdic tion

1 4 - 6 0 0 1 8 2only

a s to theorde r disposing of the m otion for re he aring). AFFIRM E D.

1 4 - 6 0 0 1 8 3
----

----

III Notices

Council

----

NOTICE OF VACANCY

(Ref. A/014)

DIRECTOR-GENERAL

(2004/C 184 A/01)

The General Secretariat of the Council intends to recruit a Director-General for Directorate-General H — Justice and Home Affairs.

More information (available in English and French) and application forms may be obtained by contacting the Selection and Recruitment Department, by e-mail to: service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int, or on its website at the following address: http://ue.eu.int/concours.

Deadline: 3 September 2004, the postmark serving as proof.

----
# Europos Sąjungos C 198/2004

| | ISSN 1725-521X |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 198 |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir prane_imai | 47 tomas2004m. rugpjūčio 5d. |

ISSN 1725-521X

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 198

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir prane_imai

47 tomas2004m. rugpjūčio 5d.

---

| Prane_imo Nr. | Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Informacija |
| | Komisija |
| 2004/C 198/1 | Euro kursas | 1 |

Prane_imo Nr.

Turinys

Puslapis

I   Informacija

Komisija

2004/C 198/1

Euro kursas

1

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

I Informacija

Komisija

| 5.8.2004 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | C 198/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2004

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

C 198/1

---

Euro kursas (1)

2004 m. rugpjūčio 4 d.

(2004/C 198/01)

1 euras=

| | Valiuta | Valiutos kursas |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | JAV doleris | 1,1983 |
| JPY | Japonijos jena | 133,72 |
| DKK | Danijos krona | 7,4352 |
| GBP | Svaras šterlingas | 0,65960 |
| SEK | Švedijos krona | 9,1938 |
| CHF | Šveicarijos frankas | 1,5394 |
| ISK | Islandijos krona | 86,33 |
| NOK | Norvegijos krona | 8,4145 |
| BGN | Bulgarijos levas | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Kipro svaras | 0,57940 |
| CZK | Čekijos krona | 31,769 |
| EEK | Estijos kronos | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Vengrijos forintas | 250,14 |
| LTL | Lietuvos litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvijos latas | 0,6527 |
| MTL | Maltos lira | 0,4245 |
| PLN | Lenkijos zlotas | 4,4350 |
| ROL | Rumunijos lėja | 40 954 |
| SIT | Slovėnijos tolaras | 240,0100 |
| SKK | Slovakijos krona | 40,120 |
| TRL | Turkijos lira | 1 782 400 |
| AUD | Australijos doleris | 1,7079 |
| CAD | Kanados doleris | 1,5844 |
| HKD | Honkongo doleris | 9,3465 |
| NZD | Naujosios Zelandijos doleris | 1,8624 |
| SGD | Singapūro doleris | 2,0667 |
| KRW | Pietų Korėjos vonas | 1 399,08 |
| ZAR | Pietų Afrikos randas | 7,5483 |

Valiuta

Valiutos kursas

USD

JAV doleris

1,1983

JPY

Japonijos jena

133,72

DKK

Danijos krona

7,4352

GBP

Svaras šterlingas

0,65960

SEK

Švedijos krona

9,1938

CHF

Šveicarijos frankas

1,5394

ISK

Islandijos krona

86,33

NOK

Norvegijos krona

8,4145

BGN

Bulgarijos levas

1,9558

CYP

Kipro svaras

0,57940

CZK

Čekijos krona

31,769

EEK

Estijos kronos

15,6466

HUF

Vengrijos forintas

250,14

LTL

Lietuvos litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvijos latas

0,6527

MTL

Maltos lira

0,4245

PLN

Lenkijos zlotas

4,4350

ROL

Rumunijos lėja

40 954

SIT

Slovėnijos tolaras

240,0100

SKK

Slovakijos krona

40,120

TRL

Turkijos lira

1 782 400

AUD

Australijos doleris

1,7079

CAD

Kanados doleris

1,5844

HKD

Honkongo doleris

9,3465

NZD

Naujosios Zelandijos doleris

1,8624

SGD

Singapūro doleris

2,0667

KRW

Pietų Korėjos vonas

1 399,08

ZAR

Pietų Afrikos randas

7,5483

---

(1)

Šaltinis: valiutų perskaičiavimo kursai paskelbti ECB.

---
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Serena Software, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2008 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, Robert I. Pender, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Serena Software, Inc. certify that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Serena Software, Inc. at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    ROBERT I. PENDER,
JR.Robert I. Pender, Jr. Senior Vice President,
Finance And Administration, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial And Accounting Officer)


Date: December 12, 2008

This Certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
§ 2570.7 Scope of discovery. For prohibited transaction penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.14 of this title. ( a ) A party may file a motion to conduct discovery with the administrative law judge. The motion for discovery shall be granted by the administrative law judge only upon a showing of good cause. In order to establish “good cause” for the purposes of this section, a party must show that the discovery requested relates to a genuine issue as to a material fact that is relevant to the proceeding. The order of the administrative law judge shall expressly limit the scope and terms of discovery to that for which “good cause” has been shown, as provided in this paragraph.
( b ) A party may obtain discovery of documents and tangible things otherwise discoverable under paragraph (a) of this section and prepared in anticipation of or for the hearing by or for another party's representative (including his or her attorney, consultant, surety, indemnitor, insurer, or agent) only upon a showing that the party seeking discovery has substantial need of the materials or information in the preparation of his or her case and that he or she is unable without undue hardship to obtain the substantial equivalent of the materials or information by other means. In ordering discovery of such materials when the required showing has been made, the administrative law judge shall protect against disclosure of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of an attorney or other representative of a party concerning the proceeding.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 9, 2015

a1202 

# Order

Clerk December 9, 2015

151959

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 151959

COA: 320032

Huron CC: 13

- 305667

- FH

RONALD MATTHEW HARTMAN, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellee.

________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 19, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant t o MCR 7.305(H)(1), in

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that part of the Court of Appeals

judgment that found the evidence insufficient to convict the defendant of possession of

methamphetamine, MCL 333.7403(2)(b)(i), and we REINSTATE that conv iction, for the

reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas R. Comstock, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 812]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20). Upon arriving at the scene of the burglary, an investigating police officer discovered a traffic ticket that he had issued the day before. After questioning by the police, the person to whom the ticket had been issued gave a confession implicating defendant. Contrary to defendant’s contention, the testimony of the accomplice was sufficiently corroborated *(see, People v Moses,*63 NY2d 299, 306; *People v Daniels,*37 NY2d 624, 629-630). The statement of defendant to the police that he was with the accomplice all night was confirmed by defendant’s wife; the testimony of the accomplice’s mother placed defendant and the accomplice near the scene of the crime around 3:00 a.m.; and other details described by the accomplice were corroborated by defendant’s wife or the accomplice’s mother.

*857We also reject the contentions that the conviction is against the weight of the evidence or based on legally insufficient evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). County Court’s *Sandoval*ruling did not constitute an abuse of discretion *(see, People v Walker,*83 NY2d 455, 458-459; *People v Laraby,*219 AD2d 817, *lv denied*88 NY2d 849, 937).

We agree with defendant, however, that the court erred in allowing the People to present evidence that defendant admitted that he committed prior larcenies of car stereos from the same business. Such evidence is admissible “in limited circumstances, when the defendant employs some unique, unusual, or distinctive modus operandi in an uncharged crime that is relevant to proving his identity as the perpetrator of the crime charged” *(People v Mateo,*93 NY2d 327, 332; *see, People v Condon,*26 NY2d 139, 143-144). Here, the prior larcenies lacked sufficient similarity to the instant crime to have a “significant bearing upon the identity issue” *(People v Johnson,*114 AD2d 210, 212; *cf., People v Beam,*57 NY2d 241, 251-252). We conclude, however, that the error is harmless *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 242).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Allegany County Court, Noonan, J. — Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.1209 Duties of attendants. The entry employer must ensure that each attendant: ( a ) Is familiar with and understands the hazards that may be faced during entry, including information on the mode, signs or symptoms, and consequences of the exposure;
( b ) Is aware of possible behavioral effects of hazard exposure in authorized entrants;
( c ) Continuously maintains an accurate count of authorized entrants in the permit space and ensures that the means used to identify authorized entrants under § 1926.1206(d) accurately identifies who is in the permit space;
( d ) Remains outside the permit space during entry operations until relieved by another attendant; Note to paragraph ( d
).
Once an attendant has been relieved by another attendant, the relieved attendant may enter a permit space to attempt a rescue when the employer's permit space program allows attendant entry for rescue and the attendant has been trained and equipped for rescue operations as required by § 1926.1211(a).
( e ) Communicates with authorized entrants as necessary to assess entrant status and to alert entrants of the need to evacuate the space under § 1926.1208(e);
( f ) Assesses activities and conditions inside and outside the space to determine if it is safe for entrants to remain in the space and orders the authorized entrants to evacuate the permit space immediately under any of the following conditions: ( 1 ) If there is a prohibited condition;
( 2 ) If the behavioral effects of hazard exposure are apparent in an authorized entrant;
( 3 ) If there is a situation outside the space that could endanger the authorized entrants; or
( 4 ) If the attendant cannot effectively and safely perform all the duties required under this section;
( g ) Summons rescue and other emergency services as soon as the attendant determines that authorized entrants may need assistance to escape from permit space hazards;
( h ) Takes the following actions when unauthorized persons approach or enter a permit space while entry is underway: ( 1 ) Warns the unauthorized persons that they must stay away from the permit space;
( 2 ) Advises the unauthorized persons that they must exit immediately if they have entered the permit space; and
( 3 ) Informs the authorized entrants and the entry supervisor if unauthorized persons have entered the permit space;
( i ) Performs non-entry rescues as specified by the employer's rescue procedure; and
( j ) Performs no duties that might interfere with the attendant's primary duty to assess and protect the authorized entrants.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-18417 and No. 333-98963) of Kewaunee Scientific
Corporation of our report dated June 4, 2003 relating to the financial
statements, which appear in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated June 4, 2003 relating to the
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina

July 22, 2003
#### Michelina Massaro, Respondent, *v.*National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut, Appellant.

Argued May 21, 1937;

decided June 8, 1937.

*605
      *Charles E. Spencer*for appellant.

*Don Carlos Buell*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O'Brien, Htjbbs, Lotjghran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted), I, Dianne
Hatton-Ward, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifiy that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

         1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
March 31, 2007, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
"PERIODIC REPORT") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company
for the period covered by the Periodic Report.

Dated: May 9, 2007


/s/ Dianne Hatton-Ward
---------------------------------
Dianne Hatton-Ward
CEO & CFO

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Yummies, Inc. and will be retained by Yummies, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request


THIS CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SS. 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED "FILED" BY THE COMPANY FOR
PURPOSES OF SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------