alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1917.120 Fixed stairways. ( a ) *Definition.* “Fixed stairway” means interior and exterior stairs serving machinery, tanks and equipment, and stairs to or from floors, platforms or pits. The term does not apply to stairs intended only for fire exit purposes, to articulated stairs (the angle of which changes with the rise and fall of the base support) or to stairs forming an intergral part of machinery.
( b ) *New installations.* ( 1 ) Fixed stairs installed after October 3, 1983 shall be positioned within the range of 30 degrees to 50 degrees to the horizontal with uniform riser height and tread width throughout each run and be capable of a minimum loading of 100 pounds per square foot (445 N) and a minimum concentrated load of 300 pounds (1,334 N) at the center of any treadspan. Riser height shall be from 6 to 7.5 inches (15.24 to 19.05 cm), stair width a minimum of 22 inches (55.88 cm) between vertical barriers, tread depth a minimum of 12±2 inches (30.48±5.08 cm), and tread nosing shall be straight leading edges.
( 2 ) Stair landings shall be at least 20 inches (50.8 cm) in depth. Where doors or gates open on a stairway, a landing platform shall be provided. Door swing shall not reduce effective standing area on the landing to less than 18 inches (45.72 cm) in depth.
( 3 ) Fixed stairs having four or more risers shall have stair railings or handrails complying with § 1917.112(c)(1).
( 4 ) Railing height from tread surface at the riser face shall be 33±3 inches (83.82 cm ±7.62 cm).
( 5 ) Restricted areas. When physical features require stairs steeper than those provided for by paragraph (b)(1) of this section, stairs at angles of 50° to 75° from the horizontal may be used if they: ( i ) Are capable of a single concentrated load of 200 pounds (890 N) at the tread centers;
( ii ) Have open treads at least 4 inches (10.16 cm) in depth and 18 inches (45.72 cm) in width with a uniformly spaced vertical rise between treads of 6 to 9.5 inches (15.24 to 24.13 cm); and
( iii ) Have handrails that meet the requirements of § 1917.112(c)(1) on both sides and that are not less than 30 inches (76.2 cm) in height from the tread surface at the riser face.
( 6 ) Maintenance. Fixed stairways shall be maintained in safe condition and shall not be obstructed.
[48 FR 30909, July 5, 1983, as amended at 65 FR 40942, June 30, 2000]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-93251, Form S-8 No. 033-62443, Form S-8 No. 333-12585, Form
S-8 No. 333-32875, Form S-8 No. 333-46953 and Form S-8 No. 333-61911) pertaining
to The Lamson & Sessions Co. Nonemployee Directors Stock Option Plan, the
Deferred Compensation Plan for Nonemployee Directors, the 1988 Incentive Equity
Performance Plan, The Lamson & Sessions Co. Deferred Savings Plan, and the 1998
Incentive Equity Plan, respectively, and the Registration Statement and related
Prospectus (Form S-3 No. 333-65795) of The Lamson & Sessions Co. of our report
dated February 7, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of The Lamson & Sessions Co., included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended January 1, 2000.


                                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 1, 2000
#### § 1977.22 Employee refusal to comply with safety rules.

Employees who refuse to comply with occupational safety and health standards or valid safety rules implemented by the employer in furtherance of the Act are not exercising any rights afforded by the Act. Disciplinary measures taken by employers solely in response to employee refusal to comply with appropriate safety rules and regulations, will not ordinarily be regarded as discriminatory action prohibited by section 11(c). This situation should be distinguished from refusals to work, as discussed in § 1977.12.
#### § 1919.33 Proof tests—wire rope.

Wire rope, except as provided in § 1919.14(b), shall be tested by sample, a piece being tested to destruction, and the safe working load of running ropes, unless otherwise acceptable to the Administration on the basis of design, shall not exceed one-fifth of the breaking load of the sample tested. In the case of running ropes used in gear with a safe working load exceeding 10 tons, the safe working load shall not exceed one-fourth of the breaking load of the sample tested.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 29, 2013

d0422

Order 

April 29, 2013

146329

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146329

COA: 305671

Wayne CC: 10-007585-FH

JERARD DUNN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of People v Earl (Docket No. 145677) is pending on appeal before this Court and 

that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for 

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the 

decision in that case.
§ 1952.29 Massachusetts. ( a ) The Massachusetts State Plan for State and local Government employees received initial approval from the Assistant Secretary on August 18, 2022.
( b ) The Plan further provides assurances of a fully trained, adequate staff within three years of plan approval, including 8 safety and 3 health compliance officers for enforcement inspections, and 2 safety and 1 health consultants to perform consultation services in the public sector. The State has assured that it will continue to provide a sufficient number of adequately trained and qualified personnel necessary for the enforcement of standards as required by 29 CFR 1956.10. The State has also given satisfactory assurance of adequate funding to support the Plan.
( c ) The plan only covers State and local government employers and employees within the State. For additional details about the plan, please visit *https://www.osha.gov/dcsp/osp/stateprogs/massachusetts.html .*
[87 FR 50775, Aug. 18, 2022]
§ 1979.107 Hearings. ( a ) Except as provided in this part, proceedings will be conducted in accordance with the rules of practice and procedure for administrative hearings before the Office of Administrative Law Judges, codified at subpart A, of 29 CFR part 18.
( b ) Upon receipt of an objection and request for hearing, the Chief Administrative Law Judge will promptly assign the case to a judge who will notify the parties of the day, time, and place of hearing. The hearing is to commence expeditiously, except upon a showing of good cause or unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. Hearings will be conducted as hearings de novo, on the record. Administrative law judges shall have broad discretion to limit discovery in order to expedite the hearing.
( c ) If both the complainant and the named person object to the findings and/or order, the objections will be consolidated and a single hearing will be conducted.
( d ) Formal rules of evidence shall not apply, but rules or principles designed to assure production of the most probative evidence shall be applied. The administrative law judge may exclude evidence which is immaterial, irrelevant, or unduly repetitious.
[68 FR 14107, Mar. 21, 2003, as amended at 86 FR 1788, Jan. 11, 2021]
# EUR-Lex - 31998R0282 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998R0282

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 282/98 of 3 February 1998 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2568/91 on the characteristics of olive oil and olive-residue oil and on the relevant methods of analysis **

*
Official Journal L 028 , 04/02/1998 P. 0005 - 0008 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 282/98 of 3 February 1998 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2568/91 on the characteristics of olive oil and olive-residue oil and on the relevant methods of analysis

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation No 136/66/EEC of 22 September 1966 on the establishment of a common organisation of the market in oils and fats (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1581/96 (2), and in particular Article 35a thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2568/91 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2472/97 (4), defines the characteristics of olive oil and olive-residue oil and the relevant methods of analysis;

Whereas subsequent verification has revealed the need to correct the text of Regulation (EC) No 2472/97; whereas, as a result, the text of Regulation (EEC) No 2568/91 should be adapted;

Whereas Regulation (EC) No 2472/97 enters into force on the 60th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities, that is on 10 February 1998; whereas this Regulation should also enter into force on that date;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Oils and Fats,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4 annexed to this Regulation are hereby added to Annex XVIII to Regulation (EEC) No 2568/91.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 February 1998.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 February 1998.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ 172, 30. 9. 1966, p. 3025/66.

(2) OJ L 206, 16. 8. 1996, p. 11.

(3) OJ L 248, 5. 9. 1991, p. 1.

(4) OJ L 341, 12. 12. 1997, p. 25.

ANNEX

Figure 1: Graph of log á against f (number of double bonds)

>REFERENCE TO A FILM>

Note: La = lauric acid; My = myristic acid; P = palmitic acid; St = stearic acid; O = oleic acid; L = linoleic acid; Ln = linolenic acid.

Figure 2: Soyabean oil

>REFERENCE TO A FILM>

Figure 3: Soyabean oil / olive oil 30/70

>REFERENCE TO A FILM>

Figure 4: Olive oil

>REFERENCE TO A FILM>
§ 1987.107 Hearings. ( a ) Except as provided in this part, proceedings will be conducted in accordance with the rules of practice and procedure for administrative hearings before the Office of Administrative Law Judges, codified at subpart A of part 18 of this title.
( b ) Upon receipt of an objection and request for hearing, the Chief Administrative Law Judge will promptly assign the case to an ALJ who will notify the parties of the day, time, and place of hearing. The hearing is to commence expeditiously, except upon a showing of good cause or unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. Hearings will be conducted de novo on the record. ALJs have broad discretion to limit discovery in order to expedite the hearing.
( c ) If both the complainant and the respondent object to the findings and/or order, the objections will be consolidated and a single hearing will be conducted.
( d ) Formal rules of evidence will not apply, but rules or principles designed to assure production of the most probative evidence will be applied. The ALJ may exclude evidence that is immaterial, irrelevant, or unduly repetitious.
[81 FR 22539, Apr. 18, 2016, as amended at 86 FR 1794, Jan. 11, 2021]
TRANSFER
      TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL CORP.




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Annual Report of Transfer Technology International Corp.
      (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), I, Chris Trina, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
      of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)


The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)


The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/  CHRIS
                TRINA
              Chris
                Trina
              Chairman,
                President and Chief Executive Officer
              April
                14, 2008




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 29, 2010

0322 

# Order

March 29, 2010

140184

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140184 COA: 281196 Wayne CC: 07-004196-01 DOMINIQUE SENARIO WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 20, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
§ 2580.412-15 Procedures to be used for estimating the amount of funds to be “handled” during the current reporting year in those cases where there is no preceding reporting year. If for any reason a plan does not have a complete preceding reporting year, the amount “handled” by persons required to be covered by a bond shall be estimated at the beginning of the calendar, policy or other fiscal year, as the case may be, which would constitute either the operating year or the reporting year of the plan, whichever shall occur first, as follows: ( a ) In the case of a plan having a previous experience year, even though it has no preceding reporting year, the estimate of the amount to be “handled” for any person required to be covered shall be based on the experience in the previous year by applying the same standards and criteria as in a plan which has a preceding reporting year. Similarly, where a plan is recently established, but has had, at the time a bond is obtained, sufficient experience to reasonably estimate a complete year's experience for persons required to be bonded, the amount of funds to be “handled” shall be projected to the complete year on the basis of the period in which the plan has had experience, unless, to the knowledge of the plan administrator, the given period of experience is so seasonal or unrepresentative of the complete year's experience as not to provide a reasonable basis for projecting the estimate for the complete year.
( b ) Where a plan does not have any prior experience sufficient to allow it to estimate the amount “handled” in the manner outlined in paragraph (a) of this section, the amount to be “handled” by the administrators, officers and employees of the plan during the current reporting year shall be that amount initially required to fund or set up the plan, plus the amount of contributions required to be made under the plan formula from any source during the current reporting year. In most cases, the amount of contributions will be calculated by multiplying the total yearly contribution per participant (required by the plan formula from either employers, employees, employer organizations or any other source) by the number of participants in the plan at the beginning of such reporting year. In cases where the per capita contribution cannot readily be determined, such as in the case of certain insured plans covered by the Act, the amount of contributions shall be estimated on the amount of insurance premiums which are actuarially estimated as necessary to support the plan, or on such other actuarially estimated basis as may be applicable. In the case of a newly formed profit-sharing plan covered by the Act, if the employer establishing the plan has a previous year of experience, the amount of contributions required by the plan formula shall be estimated on the basis of the profits of the previous year. The amount of the bond shall then be fixed at 10 percent of this calculation, but not more than $500,000. A bond for such amount shall be obtained in any form the plan desires on all persons who are administrators, officers, or employees of the plan and who “handle” funds or other property of the plan.
AAM-12-332-E May 1, 2012

Exemption No. 10528 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0449

Mr. Leland Blatter

North Star Aviation 516 Airport Road Hamilton, MT 59840

Dear Mr. Blatter:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 20, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of North Star Aviation (North Star) fo r an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow North Star to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to North Star.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant North Star Aviation an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow North Star to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of North Star are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of the Prairie Aviation dba North Star part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.19B

            SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
                      1991 KEY EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN


The Kewaunee Scientific Corporation 1991 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (the
"Plan"), as adopted effective May 29, 1991, is hereby amended as follows,
pursuant to the authority retained by the Company pursuant to Article 11
thereof:

     1.   Article 8, Section (b) is amended to read as follows:

          "Notwithstanding the foregoing, an option shall to be
          exercisable after the expiration of its specified term and
          shall be exercisable only to the extent it was exercisable
          at the date of such termination of employment, except that
          if the Optionee's employment is terminated by death, of if
          the option so provides, by retirement (as defined in the
          Company's qualified retirement plan for salaried employees),
          at any time on or after the first anniversary of the option,
          the option may be exercised in full during its specified
          term during the period provided above."

     2.   In all other respects, the plan shall remain in full force
          and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed this
26th day of August, 1998.

                                    KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

                                    By       /s/ D. M. Parker
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       D.M. Parker

                                    Its Secretary
                                        --------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo
F. Wells, III, Principal Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Principal Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the
Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Leo F. Wells, III      
|Leo F. Wells, III          
|Principal Executive Officer
|May 11, 2007               



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Douglas P. Williams    
|Douglas P. Williams        
|Principal Financial Officer
|May 11, 2007