alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 23.260 Records to be kept by contractors. ( a ) *Records.* The contractor and each subcontractor performing work subject to Executive Order 14026 shall make and maintain, for three years, records containing the information specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (6) of this section for each worker and shall make them available for inspection and transcription by authorized representatives of the Wage and Hour Division of the U.S. Department of Labor: ( 1 ) Name, address, and social security number of each worker;
( 2 ) The worker's occupation(s) or classification(s);
( 3 ) The rate or rates of wages paid;
( 4 ) The number of daily and weekly hours worked by each worker;
( 5 ) Any deductions made; and
( 6 ) The total wages paid.
( b ) *Interviews.* The contractor shall permit authorized representatives of the Wage and Hour Division to conduct interviews with workers at the worksite during normal working hours.
( c ) *Other recordkeeping obligations.* Nothing in this part limits or otherwise modifies the contractor's recordkeeping obligations, if any, under the Davis-Bacon Act, the Service Contract Act, or the Fair Labor Standards Act, or their implementing regulations in this title.
§ 2520.104a-9 Annual reporting for defined contribution group (DCG) reporting arrangements. ( a ) *General.* A defined contribution group (DCG) reporting arrangement described in § 2520.104-51(c) that files a consolidated annual report for all the plans participating in the DCG reporting arrangement in accordance with the terms of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section shall be deemed to have filed such a report in accordance with § 2520.104a-9 for purposes of § 2520.104-51.
( b ) *Date of filing.* The consolidated annual report shall be filed within seven months after the close of the common plan year of all the plans participating in the DCG reporting arrangement, unless extended. See “When to file” instructions of the Form 5500 Annual Return/Report.
( c ) *Where to file.* The consolidated annual report prescribed in § 2520.103-14 shall be filed electronically in accordance with the instructions to the Annual Return/Report Form.
[88 FR 11812, Feb. 24, 2023]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas S. McHugh, Interim Chief
Financial Officer, Interim Treasurer, Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President of Finance and Corporate Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 25, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas S. McHugh                                                                                                                             
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Thomas S. McHugh Interim Chief Financial Officer, Interim Treasurer, Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President of Finance and Corporate Controller

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as our exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be deemed to be considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 99 (Monday, May 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 32123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12702]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Boston Harbor Islands Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (PL 92-463) that the Boston Harbor Islands Advisory 
Council will meet on Wednesday, June 7, 2000. The meeting will convene 
at 4 p.m. at the United States Courthouse, 1 Courthouse Way, Jury Room 
II, Boston, Massachusetts.
    The Advisory Council was appointed by the Director of National Park 
Service pursuant to Public Law 104-333. The 28 members represent 
business, educational, cultural, and environmental entities; 
municipalities surrounding Boston Harbor; Boston Harbor advocates; and 
Native American interests. The purpose of the Council is to advise and 
make recommendations to the Boston Harbor Islands Partnership with 
respect to the development and implementation of a management plan and 
the operation of the Boston Harbor Islands National Recreation Area.
    The Agenda for this meeting is as follows:
    1. Approval of minutes from March 2, 2000.
    2. Discuss and plan reportcard.
    3. Discussion on the draft General Management Plan.
    The meeting is open to the public. Further information concerning 
Council meetings may be obtained from the Superintendent, Boston Harbor 
Islands. Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the 
Council or file written statements. Such requests should be made at 
least seven days prior to the meeting to: Superintendent, Boston Harbor 
Islands NRA, 408 Atlantic Ave., Boston, MA, 02110, telephone (617) 223-
8667.

    Dated: May 8, 2000.
George E. Price, Jr.,
Superintendent, Boston Harbor Islands NRA.
[FR Doc. 00-12702 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 104 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 104

Supporting ``Lights On Afterschool!'', a national celebration of after 
                            school programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 26 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

 Mr. Dodd (for himself, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Kohl, Mr. Burr, Mrs. Lincoln, 
 Mr. Stevens, Mr. Casey, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Feingold, Ms. Stabenow, Mrs. 
   Murray, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Lieberman, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Biden, Mr. 
    Barrasso, Ms. Collins, and Mr. Specter) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Supporting ``Lights On Afterschool!'', a national celebration of after 
                            school programs.

Whereas high quality after school programs provide safe, challenging, engaging, 
        and fun learning experiences to help children and youth develop their 
        social, emotional, physical, cultural, and academic skills;
Whereas high quality after school programs support working families by ensuring 
        that the children in such families are safe and productive after the 
        regular school day ends;
Whereas high quality after school programs build stronger communities by 
        involving the Nation's students, parents, business leaders, and adult 
        volunteers in the lives of the Nation's youth, thereby promoting 
        positive relationships among children, youth, families, and adults;
Whereas high quality after school programs engage families, schools, and diverse 
        community partners in advancing the well-being of the Nation's children;
Whereas ``Lights On Afterschool!'', a national celebration of after school 
        programs held on October 16, 2008, promotes the critical importance of 
        high quality after school programs in the lives of children, their 
        families, and their communities;
Whereas more than 28,000,000 children in the United States have parents who work 
        outside the home and 14,300,000 children in the United States have no 
        place to go after school; and
Whereas many after school programs across the United States are struggling to 
        keep their doors open and their lights on: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress supports the goals and ideals of ``Lights On 
Afterschool!'' a national celebration of after school programs.
                                 <all>
```
firstamendsallyramsey.htm


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    FIRST
AMENDEMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     

    This First Amendment to Employment
Agreement is made as December 15, 2008 (“Amendment”), by and between Ecology Coatings, Inc., a
Nevada corporation (“Company”) and Sally J.W. Ramsey (“Executive”) and amends
the Employment Agreement between Company and Executive dated January 1, 2007
(“Agreement”).

     

    1. The
parties agree to amend Section 4.1 of the Agreement to add the following
language at the end of Section 4.1:

     

    


     

    Notwithstanding
the foregoing, Executive agrees to an annual salary of $60,000 until the Company
obtains/closes on additional equity financing that supports a sustainable
Company.

     

    
      	
              2.  

            	
              In
      all other respects, the terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force
      and effect.

            


    

     

    


     

    ECOLOGY
COATINGS, INC.

     

    


     

    By:  /s/ Robert G.
Crockett                                                                                                                     By:  /s/ Sally J.W.
Ramsey

     

             Robert
G.
Crockett                                                                                                                         
Sally J.W. Ramsey

     

    


     

    Its:  CEO
#### § 2570.120 Scope of review.

The review of the Secretary shall not be a *de novo* proceeding but rather a review of the record established before the administrative law judge. There shall be no opportunity for oral argument.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-20175

Summary Calendar

WENDY MEIGS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

NMC HOMECARE INCORPORATED, formerly known as National

Medical Care Home Care Division, Incorporated;

NATIONAL MEDICAL CARE INCORPORATED,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(H-95-CV-4320)

September 5, 1997

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Meigs sued her employers, NMC Homecare Inc. And National

Medical Care Inc., alleging wrongful discharge under Texas law.

The employers removed this action to the federal district court on
2

the grounds of diversity. The federal district judge entered

summary judgment in favor of the employers and Meigs appealed. 

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts and

relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated by

the district judge in her thorough and comprehensive order filed

under date of January 26, 1997, we are satisfied that the grant of

summary judgment in favor of the employers was correct.

AFFIRMED.
# EUR-Lex - 31997E0288 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31997E0288

**97/288/CFSP: Joint Action of 29 April 1997 adopted by the Council on the basis of Article J.3 of the Treaty on European Union on the European Union's contribution to the promotion of transparency in nuclear-related export controls **

*
Official Journal L 120 , 12/05/1997 P. 0001 - 0001 *

JOINT ACTION of 29 April 1997 adopted by the Council on the basis of Article J.3 of the Treaty on European Union on the European Union's contribution to the promotion of transparency in nuclear-related export controls (97/288/CFSP)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles J.3 and J.11 thereof,

Having regard to the general guidelines laid down by the European Council in Corfu on 24 and 25 June 1994,

Having regard to the decisions of the Conference of the States party to the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) held from 17 April to 12 May 1995,

Having regard to the preparations under way for the 2000 NPT Review Conference,

HAS ADOPTED THIS JOINT ACTION:

Article 1

The objective of this Joint Action shall be to contribute to the strengthening of the international nuclear non-proliferation system, including the promotion of transparency in nuclear-related export controls within the framework of dialogue and cooperation among all interested States party to the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).

Article 2

1. For the purposes of the objective set out in Article 1, the European Union shall, among other activities, support the efforts of the Nuclear Suppliers' Group (NSG) to promote transparency. This support will include:

- an active European Union contribution to progress in the work of the NSG Working Group on Transparency which was established by the NSG Buenos Aires plenary from 25 to 26 April 1996,

- a contribution of up to ECU 75 000, to be charged to the general budget of the European Communities for 1997, to the financing of the first NSG seminar on nuclear-related export controls, which is scheduled to take place in October 1997.

2. The expenditure financed by the amount stipulated in paragraph 1 shall be managed in accordance with the European Community procedures and rules applicable to the said budget.

Article 3

The Council will review the implementation of this Joint Action, and the possibility of further measures to be undertaken by the European Union, notably in the context of preparation for the 2000 NPT Review Conference.

Article 4

This Joint Action shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Article 5

This Joint Action shall be published in the Official Journal.

Done at Luxembourg, 29 April 1997.

For the Council

The President

H. VAN MIERLO
#### UNITED STATES v. FORD MOTOR CO.

[81 C. Cls. 30; 296 U. S. 636]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court November 11, 1935.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Robert Foran v. Cameron Roesle and Robert W. Berleth

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00556

- CV

Trial court case number: 19

- DCV

- 267154

Trial court: 400th District Cou rt of Fort Bend County

On January 27, 202 2 , this Court a dvised the parties that it could not determine whether an automatic stay as to the instant appeal was in effect in light of the bankruptcy of Preferred Ready

- Mix LLC , which filed a chapter 11 bankru p tcy petition, Cause No. 21

- 33369 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. T he Co urt asked the partie s to respond within ten days, explaining whether this appeal should be stayed in light of the bankruptcy.

On Ja n uary 31, 2022, appellee Cameron Roesle filed an “ Em ergency Motion to Extend Time, ” requesting an extension of time in which to respond to the Cour t ’ s January 27, 20 2 2

notice . Appelle e advised in the motion that a February 23, 2022 hearing in bankruptcy c o urt may affect this appeal . Appellee ’ s motion is granted. The deadline for the parties to respond to

this Court ’ s notice is February 2 8, 2022.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___________ /s/ Julie Countiss

__________ Acting indivi dually

Date: February 3, 2022
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elgrande International, Inc.(the "Company") On Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael F. Holloran, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Michael F. Holloran Michael F. Holloran Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer  January 16, 2006
[No. 28400-6-II.

Division Two.

November 1, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Adam George Thorp, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 01-8-01310-1, Robert L. Harris, J., entered January 31, 2002. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Houghton and Armstrong, JJ.
[No. 20867-2-III.

Division Three.

November 12, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Daryl William Campbell, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Stevens County, No. 01-1-00057-2, Rebecca M. Baker, J., entered January 25, 2002. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, J., concurred in by Brown, C.J., and Kurtz, J.
§ 2200.40 Motions and requests. ( a ) *How to make.* An application or request for an order must be made by written motion. A motion shall not be included in another pleading or document, such as a brief or petition for discretionary review, but shall be made in a separate document. In exigent circumstances in cases pending before a Judge, an oral motion may be made during an off-the-record telephone conference if the motion is subsequently reduced to writing and filed within such time as the judge prescribes.
( b ) *Form of motions.* All motions shall contain a caption complying with § 2200.31 and a signature complying with § 2200.32. Requests for orders that are presented in any other form, such as by a business letter or by an email, shall not be considered or granted.
( c ) *Content of motions.* A motion shall contain a clear and plain statement of the relief sought and state with particularity the grounds for seeking the order. Written memoranda, briefs, affidavits, or other relevant material or documents may be filed in support of the motion or a response.
( d ) *Duty to confer.* Prior to filing a motion, the moving party shall confer or make reasonable efforts to confer with all other parties and shall state in the motion the efforts undertaken to confer. The motion shall also state if any other party opposes or does not oppose the motion.
( e ) *Proposed order for procedural motions.* All procedural motions shall be accompanied by a proposed order that would grant the relief requested in the motion. A procedural motion may be ruled upon prior to the expiration of the time for response.
( f ) *Oral motions.* Oral motions may be made during a hearing and shall be included in the transcript, if a transcript is being made.
( g ) *When to make.* ( 1 ) A motion filed in lieu of an answer pursuant to § 2200.34(c) shall be filed no later than 21 days after service of the complaint.
( 2 ) Motions shall be made as soon as the grounds for the motion are known. A party is not required to raise by motion any matter that the party has previously included in any pleading as defined in § 2200.1(n), unless the party seeks a ruling on the previously pleaded matter prior to the hearing on the merits.
( 3 ) A motion to postpone a hearing shall comply with § 2200.62.
( h ) *Responses.* Any party or intervenor upon whom a motion has been served shall file a response within 14 days from service of the motion.
( i ) *Reconsideration.* A party adversely affected by a ruling on any motion may file a motion for reconsideration within 7 days of service of the ruling.
( j ) *Summary judgment motions.* The provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 apply to motions for summary judgment.