alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET OF LILLY INDUSTRIES, INC. AS
AT November 30, 1995 AND THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF
INCOME OF LILLY INDUSTRIES, INC. FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             NOV-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                                  NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                                          20,260
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   42,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   ( 2,051)
<INVENTORY>                                                     15,411
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                76,931
<PP&E>                                                          86,273
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 (40,804)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 183,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           41,426
<BONDS>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                        88,697
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      20,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   183,582
<SALES>                                                        328,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               328,345
<CGS>                                                          219,899
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  292,957
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              (    544)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               2,158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 33,774
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    13,510
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    20,264
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      .88
##### 



Exhibit 3.4
 REGULATIONS
OF
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION
(the Corporation)
 ARTICLE I
MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS
 SECTION 1.01. ANNUAL MEETING .
 SECTION 1.02. SPECIAL MEETING .
 SECTION 1.03. NOTICE OF MEETINGS .
 SECTION 1.04. PERSONS BECOMING ENTITLED TO SHARES BY OPERATION OF LAW OR TRANSFER .
 SECTION 1.05. QUORUM AND ADJOURNMENTS .




---



##### 



SECTION 1.06. ORGANIZATION OF MEETINGS .
  SECTION 1.07. CONDUCT OF BUSINESS .
 SECTION 1.08. PROXIES AND VOTING AT MEETINGS .
    SECTION 1.09. SHAREHOLDERS LIST .
   SECTION 1.10. WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS .
 ARTICLE II  DIRECTORS
 SECTION 2.01. POWERS .




---



##### 



SECTION 2.02. NUMBER .
 SECTION 2.03. NOMINATION .
 SECTION 2.04. CLASSIFICATION, TERM OF OFFICE AND ELECTION OF DIRECTORS .
 SECTION 2.05. INCREASE OR DECREASE IN THE NUMBER OF DIRECTORS.




---



##### 



SECTION 2.06. VACANCY .
  SECTION 2.07. REMOVAL OF A DIRECTOR .
  SECTION 2.08. QUORUM AND ADJUSTMENTS .
 SECTION 2.09. ORGANIZATION MEETING .
 SECTION 2.10. REGULAR MEETINGS .
 SECTION 2.11. SPECIAL MEETINGS .




---



##### 



SECTION 2.12. PARTICIPATION IN MEETINGS BY TELEPHONE .
 SECTION 2.13. COMPENSATION .
 ARTICLE III
COMMITTEES
 SECTION 3.01. COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS .
  SECTION 3.02. CONDUCT OF BUSINESS .
 ARTICLE IV
OFFICERS
 SECTION 4.01. ELECTION .
 SECTION 4.02. TERM .




---



##### 



SECTION 4.03. PRESIDENT .
 SECTION 4.04. CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD .
 SECTION 4.05. VICE PRESIDENT .
 SECTION 4.06. SECRETARY .
 SECTION 4.07. TREASURER .
 SECTION 4.08. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY .
 SECTION 4.09. ACTION WITH RESPECT TO SECURITIES OF OTHER CORPORATIONS .
 ARTICLE V
INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
 SECTION 5.01. INDEMNIFICATION .




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
CAPITAL STOCK
 SECTION 6.01. STOCK CERTIFICATES .
 SECTION 6.02. TRANSFERS .
 SECTION 6.03. REGISTERED HOLDERS .
 SECTION 6.04. NEW CERTIFICATES .
 ARTICLE VII
MISCELLANEOUS
 SECTION 7.01. PROVISION ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION .
 SECTION 7.02. RECORD DATES .
 SECTION 7.03. AMENDMENTS .
 SECTION 7.04. FISCAL YEAR .
#### OLE T. RAMSLAND v. OLE G. ROSTE.1

October 29, 1896.

Nos. 10,150 — (108).

Authority of Attorney — Frivolous Appeal.

*Held,*that the appeal in this case is without merit.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Eenville county, in favor of plaintiff for $28.20.

Affirmed.

*B. T. Bah/*and *O. A, Bbsness,*for appellant.

*McClelland &*Tifft, for respondent.

1

 Reported in 68 N. W. 847.

COLLINS, J.

This is an appeal in an action originally brought in justice’s court to recover upon defendant’s written acceptance of an *130order, also in writing, for $20. On the return day mentioned in the summons — July 8,1805 — the parties appeared by their attorneys; and defendant, by his attorney, filed an answer in which the making and acceptance of the order were admitted, but it was alleged that such acceptance was procured by plaintiff by means of false and fraudulent representations. It was admitted, however, that there was due thereon to plaintiff the sum of $7, and that plaintiff was entitled to judgment for that sum, with interest and costs. On the filing of a reply the cause was continued until July 20 by consent of parties. July 18 there was filed with the justice a written stipulation, signed by the attorneys for the respective parties, which in terms waived all irregularities, and authorized the justice to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff for $7.85 damages, and the costs of the action, fixed at $7.10.

On July 20 plaintiff made no appearance, but, from certain unauthorized entries found in the justice’s docket, it appears that defendant appeared in person and by another attorney, and, under oath, alleged that neither of the attorneys who answered for him was “engaged to defend him in this action,” that they were never authorized “to make any stipulation” in his behalf, and further that he was not indebted to plaintiff in any sum. So far as appears from the record, the defendant made no further effort to avoid the effect of the answer or the stipulation. He did not ask permission to file any other or different answer, nor did he do anything more than orally assert that all steps previously taken were unauthorized, except to demand that the case be dismissed because of plaintiff’s failure to be present on the day to which the cause had been continued. And these facts only appear from the recitals in the docket. The justice denied the motion to dismiss, and on the same day entered judgment against defendant in accordance with the terms of the stipulation. Defendant appealed on questions of law, and this judgment was affirmed in district court.

We have stated the facts with more particularity than the case deserves, for the purpose of emphasizing the statement that, putting aside all consideration of the insignificant amount involved, the appeal is frivolous and without merit. This is so plain that we do not propose to dignify the case, or waste any time in discussing the points made by defendant’s counsel in his behalf.

Judgment affirmed.
§ 2704.104 Eligibility of applicants. ( a ) To be eligible for an award of attorney fees and other expenses under the Act, the applicant must be a party to the adversary adjudication for which it seeks an award. The term “party” is defined in 5 U.S.C. 551(3). The applicant must show that it satisfies the conditions of eligibility set out in this subpart and in subpart B.
( b ) For purposes of awards under § 2704.105(a) for prevailing parties: ( 1 ) The employees of an applicant include all persons who regularly perform services for remuneration for the applicant, under the applicant's direction and control. Part-time employees shall be included on a proportional basis.
( 2 ) An applicant who owns an unincorporated business will be considered as an “individual” rather than a “sole owner of an unincorporated business” if the issues on which the applicant prevails are related primarily to personal interests rather than to business interests.
( 3 ) The types of eligible applicants are as follows: ( i ) An individual with a net worth of not more than $2 million;
( ii ) The sole owner of an unincorporated business who has a net worth of not more than $7 million, including both personal and business interests, and employs not more than 500 employees;
( iii ) Any other partnership, corporation, association, unit of local government, or public or private organization with a net worth of not more than $7 million and not more than 500 employees.
( c ) For the purposes of awards for non-prevailing parties under § 2704.105(b), eligible applicants are small entities as defined in 5 U.S.C. 601, subject to the annual-receipts and number-of-employees standards as set forth by the Small Business Administration at 13 CFR part 121.
( d ) For the purpose of eligibility, the net worth, number of employees, or annual receipts of an applicant, as applicable, shall be determined as of the date the underlying proceeding was initiated under the Mine Act.
( e ) An applicant that participates in a proceeding primarily on behalf of one or more other persons or entities that would be ineligible is not itself eligible for an award.
[47 FR 10001, Mar. 9, 1982, as amended at 54 FR 6285, Feb. 9, 1989, 63 FR 63175, Nov. 12, 1998; 71 FR 44210; Aug. 4, 2006; 71 FR 54905, Sept. 20, 2006]
dianol 

May 7, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

2 l,! '· (1 I ' -' 

STEVE ROSENTHAL, MAYOR 

101 Front Street • P.O. Box 269 

Indianola, Mississippi 38751 

Office: 662.887.1825 

Fax: 662.887.6009 

Cell: 662.207.0684 

coimayor@bellsouth.net 

The City of Indianola, Mississippi wishes to lend its support to the proposal of Silver Airways to provide 

essential air service at Greenville, Ms as replacement for current Delta Air lines service. 

Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air 

transportation system is critical to the economic well being of the entire Mississippi Delta. 

The Silver Airways proposals offers the best proposal for air service out of Greenville, Ms. The size and 

type airplane as well as servjce to Atlanta makes this the most logical choice for service. 

I believe the Silver air service proposal is our best option to have consistent, dependable and convenient 

service for the Delta. 

1/we urge the Department of Transportation to award Silver Airways the designation to provide 

Greenville, MS and the Mississippi Delta essential air service. 

Best regards, 

Steve 

~((~ Rosenthal
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31316-31317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12431]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties can 
review or obtain copies of agreements at the Washington, DC offices of 
the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, N.W., Room 962. Interested 
parties may submit comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal 
Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within 10 days of the date 
this notice appears in the Federal Register.

Agreement No.: 011299-003.
Title: A.P. Moller-Maersk Sealand/P&O.
    Nedlloyd Agreement.
Parties:
    A.P. Moller-Maersk Sealand.
    P&O Nedlloyd Limited.

[[Page 31317]]

Synopsis: The proposed modification restates the agreement to reflect 
the current understanding of the parties.

    Dated: May 12, 2000.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-12431 Filed 5-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### Cathy Shrenkel, Respondent, v New York State Dormitory Authority, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 299]

— In an ac*370tion to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.), entered December 18, 1997, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

On March 5, 1993, the plaintiff allegedly was injured when she slipped and fell on snow and ice on a stairway in front of a dormitory at the State University of New York at Stony Brook (hereinafter SUNY). She subsequently commenced this action against the defendant, which financed construction of the dormitory and then leased it to SUNY when the construction was completed in 1969. She alleges that the accident was caused by improper snow and ice removal and the absence of a handrail on the stairs.

The Supreme Court erred in denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The rights reserved to the defendant, an out-of-possession owner/lessor, in its lease with SUNY do not constitute sufficient retention of control over the premises to subject the defendant to liability *(see, Garcia v Dormitory Auth.,*195 AD2d 288; *see also, Miele v UDC-Ten Eyck Dev. Corp.,*235 AD2d 774; *Green v Dormitory Auth.,*173 AD2d 1). The provisions of the lease placed full responsibility on SUNY to operate, maintain, and repair the dormitory and related facilities. The plaintiff’s contention that the defendant improperly designed or constructed the stairway in 1969 is purely speculative. Altman, J. P., Florio, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
#### § 1919.8 Suspension or revocation of accreditation.

The Assistant Secretary may suspend or revoke the accreditation of any person for cause. Except in cases of willfulness or cases in which the public interest requires otherwise, before any accreditation is suspended or revoked, facts or conduct which may warrant such action shall be called to the attention of the person involved in writing and that person shall be afforded an opportunity to achieve or demonstrate appropriate compliance.
Editorial Note on Part 294
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 294 appear at 84 FR 15934, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 294.10 Exemption authority. Canadian charter air taxi operators registered under this part are exempt from the following provisions of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII to the extent necessary to perform charter air service between the United States and Canada, and as long as they comply with the terms, conditions, and limitations of this part: ( a ) Section 41302 (permits).
( b ) Section 41501 (carrier's duty to observe reasonable rates).
( c ) Section 41310 (discrimination).
( d ) Section 41313 (aviation disaster family assistance plans for foreign air carriers).
[ER-1257, 46 FR 52591, Oct. 27, 1981, as amended at 60 FR 43526, Aug. 22, 1995; 71 FR 49347, Aug. 23, 2006; DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15934, Apr. 16, 2019]
**EXHIBIT 21** **SUBSIDIARIES    OF THE COMPANY**     The following is a list of our active subsidiaries as of    December 31, 2007, including the jurisdiction of    incorporation of each and the names under which such    subsidiaries conduct business. In the case of each subsidiary    which is indented, its immediate parent owns beneficially all of    the voting securities.        VGR Holding LLC     Delaware    Liggett Group LLC     Delaware    Vector Tobacco Inc.      Virginia    Liggett Vector Brands Inc.      Delaware    New Valley LLC     Delaware     Not included above are other subsidiaries which, if considered    in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a    significant subsidiary, as such term is defined by    Rule 1-02(w)    of    Regulation S-X.
110TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 49

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns

3 on Thursday, October 4, 2007, or Friday, October 5,

4 2007, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent res5 olution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand

6 recessed or adjourned until 12 noon on Monday, October

7 15, 2007, or such other time on that day as may be speci8 fied by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion

9 to recess or adjourn, or until the time of any reassembly

10 pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, which11 ever occurs first.

12 SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate, after con13 sultation with the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall no14 tify the Members of the Senate to reassemble at such place
 †

2

SCON 49 ES

1 and time as he may designate if, in his opinion, the public

2 interest shall warrant it.

Passed the Senate October 4, 2007.

Attest:

Secretary.
110TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 49

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess

of the Senate.
EXHIBIT
  32





CERTIFICATION  OF  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  AND  PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
  Albert H. Pleus, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that the Quarterly Report on
  Form 10-QSB of a21, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies
  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
  of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
  of operations of a21, Inc.





I,
  Jose Perez, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
  of a21, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
  contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of a21, Inc.





By: /s/ Albert H. Pleus


Albert
  H. Pleus  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)





By: /s/ Jose Perez


Jose
  Perez  Vice President of Finance  (Principal Financial Officer)





Date:
  September 15, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kellwood Company (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ended February 3, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
hereby individually certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

     and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company as of and for the period covered in the Report.

  /s/ Robert C. Skinner, Jr.
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Robert C. Skinner, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

  March 22, 2007

  /s/ W. Lee Capps III
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  W. Lee Capps III, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
  Treasurer

  March 22, 2007
§ 32.49 Recordkeeping. ( a ) Each recipient shall maintain for a period of not less than three years records regarding complaints and actions taken thereunder, and such employment or other records as required by the Assistant Secretary or by this part and shall furnish such information in the form required by the Assistant Secretary or as the Assistant Secretary deems necessary for the administration of the Act and regulations in this part.
( b ) Failure to maintain and furnish complete and accurate records as required under this section is a ground for the imposition of appropriate sanctions.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted), I, Dianne
Hatton-Ward, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

     1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2003, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1
(the "PERIODIC REPORT") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company
for the period covered by the Periodic Report.

Dated: February 13, 2004


/s/ Dianne Hatton-Ward
-------------------------------
Dianne Hatton-Ward
CEO & CFO

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Yummies, Inc. and will be retained by Yummies, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request

THIS CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SS. 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED "FILED" BY THE COMPANY FOR
PURPOSES OF SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.