alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### TOLEDO FACTORIES CO v STAPLETON

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist, Lucas Co

No. 2234.

Decided January 13, 1930

Mr. J. M. Diven, Toledo, for Factories Co.

Messrs. Mulholiand & Hartman, Toledo, for Stapleton.

RICHARDS, J.

It is contended that there is no testimony that the defendant company had knowledge of this defective step, but the stairway had just been rebuilt and was accepted by the company in that condition, the injury occurring only six days after the completion of the stairway. Under these circumstances the company is responsible for the defective condition. While permitting a projection of one-sixteerith of an inch on a sidewalk might not create a dangerous situation nor be negligence, yet to maintain a perpendicular projection of that much on the outer edge of a step of a stairway could be found by a jury to be negligence and to create a dangerous-situation. The matter of contributory negligence was left to the jury and the judgment can not be disturbed on the claim that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence.

This court is of opinion, however, that the verdict and judgment are excessive in amount. It is a significant fact that the amount of the verdict is precisely the same as the amount claimed in the petition. Mrs. Stapleton’s injuries consisted of bruises, strains and abrasions. She suffered no broken bones and no internal injuries and the testimony does not show that her injuries are permanent, although she has some nervousness.

We think the verdict is entirely out of proportion to the injuries sustained. If the defendant in error will remit $2,000.00 from the judgment as of its date, the judgment will be modified accordingly and affirmed as modified. Otherwise it will be reversed on the ground that it is manifestly against the weight of the evidence, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Williams and Lloyd, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 21

                           Subsidiaries of Registrant

NAME                                               JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
----                                               -----------------------------

First Medical Corporation                          Delaware

Midwest Managed Care Inc.                          Illinois

FMC Healthcare Services, Inc.                      Delaware

First Medical Corporation - Texas Division         Texas

SPI Managed Care of Hillsborough, Inc.             Florida

SPI Managed Care of Broward, Inc.                  Florida

SPI Managed Care, Inc.                             Florida

Broward Managed Care, Inc.                         Florida

HOC of Miami, Inc.                                 Florida

Dominion Healthnet, Inc.                           Florida

NICO Inc.                                          Delaware

HallMark Electrical Supplies Corp.                 New York

Universal Export Supply Corp.                      New York

American Medical Centers Managed Co., Ltd.         British Virgin Island
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FORM 10K.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      19,653,000
<SECURITIES>                                11,605,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               55,741,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,513,000
<INVENTORY>                                 28,406,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           115,593,000
<PP&E>                                      69,749,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              29,257,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             171,040,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       37,238,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    14,042,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 107,890,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               171,040,000
<SALES>                                    241,697,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           244,908,000
<CGS>                                      167,904,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              212,302,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,901,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             601,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             30,104,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 9,084,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         21,020,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                21,020,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.61
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30,
2000
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-03-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           2,854
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,035
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 352,435
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          619,265
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (266,830)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   352,435
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,271
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,649
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (53,920)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
13223

#### SPIVEY *ET AL.*v. BLACKWOOD, GOVERNOR, *ET AL.*

(159 S. E., 927)

*Messrs. Charles B. Perry, Jr.,*and *George W-arren,*for appellants.

*Messrs. John M. Daniel, Attorney General, Cordie Page*and /. *Ivey Humphrey, Assistants Attorney General,*and *Randolph Murdaugh, Solicitor,*for respondent.

August 6, 1931.

*Per curiam.*

*522This matter came before this Court on a motion for an order of supersedeas to restrain any further proceedings which might be taken under the order of Mr. Justice Carter, dated August 4, 1931, dismissing the motion for a writ of *certiorari*until the appeal from that order could be heard on its merits.

Upon the suggestion of the Court, counsel agreed that the appeal from the order of Mr. Justice Carter should now be heard on its merits and the motion for supersedeas be abandoned. Accordingly the case was heard on its merits.

The Court is of the opinion that the order of Mr. Justice Carter, holding the action of the Governor in declaring the office of sheriff of Jasper County vacant was executive in its nature, and is not subject to review at this time in this proceeding, was correct, and for that reason the appeal is dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 89 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 89

 To prohibit authorized committees and leadership PACs from employing 
  the spouse or immediate family members of any candidate or Federal 
               office holder connected to the committee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit authorized committees and leadership PACs from employing 
  the spouse or immediate family members of any candidate or Federal 
               office holder connected to the committee.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON EMPLOYMENT OF FAMILY MEMBERS OF A CANDIDATE 
              OR FEDERAL OFFICE HOLDER BY CERTAIN POLITICAL COMMITTEES.

    (a) In General.--Title III of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 
1971 (2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 324 
the following new section:

``SEC. 325. PROHIBITION ON EMPLOYMENT OF FAMILY MEMBERS OF A CANDIDATE 
              OR FEDERAL OFFICE HOLDER BY CERTAIN POLITICAL COMMITTEES.

    ``(a) In General.--It shall be unlawful for any authorized 
committee of a candidate or any other political committee established, 
maintained, or controlled by a candidate or a person who holds a 
Federal office to employ--
            ``(1) the spouse of such candidate or Federal office 
        holder; or
            ``(2) any immediate family member of such candidate or 
        Federal office holder.
    ``(b) Immediate Family Member.--For purposes of subsection (a), the 
term `immediate family member' means a son, daughter, stepson, 
stepdaughter, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, mother, father, stepmother, 
stepfather, mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother, sister, stepbrother, 
or stepsister of the Member.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### 124 In-To-Go Corp., Appellant, v Roundabout Theatre Company, Inc., Defendant, and 1133 Building Corp. et al., Respondents.

[698 NYS2d 31]

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered July 12, 1999, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendants-respondents’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s first and sixth causes of action, granted defendants-respondents’ holdover petition, declared the subject lease terminated, awarded defendants-respondents immediate *167possession of the premises and ordered that a warrant of eviction issue for the removal of plaintiff and all other parties named as respondents in the holdover petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The lease provision limiting plaintiffs remedy to a plenary action for consequential damages is enforceable *(see, Daily News v Rockwell Intl. Corp.,*256 AD2d 13, *lv denied*93 NY2d 803), and the disposition on appeal allows plaintiff the unfettered option to proceed on its claim for damages. In any event, plaintiff had no enforceable expectation that defendant landlord would act in good faith in exercising its absolute right of termination *(see, e.g., Chrysler Credit Corp. v Dioguardi Jeep Eagle,*192 AD2d 1066). Because plaintiff must be given 90 days’ notice of termination, the agreement is not void for lack of mutuality *(cf., Dorman v Cohen,*66 AD2d 411, 419), and, in any event, plaintiff performed pursuant to the agreement for years, remedying the purported lack of mutuality by its conduct *(see, e.g., Ferguson v Ferguson,*97 AD2d 891). We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Tom, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 490 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.490

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                                 An Act

 
To designate a mountain ridge in the State of Montana as ``B-47 Ridge''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``B-47 Ridge Designation Act''.
SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF B-47 RIDGE, MONTANA.
    (a) Designation.--
        (1) In general.--The unnamed mountain ridge located at 
    4514'40.89" N., 11043'38.75" W. that runs south and west of 
    Emigrant Peak in the Absaroka Range in the State of Montana, which 
    is the approximate site of a crash of a B-47, shall be known and 
    designated as ``B-47 Ridge''.
        (2) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 
    document, paper, or other record of the United States to the ridge 
    described in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a reference to 
    ``B-47 Ridge''.
    (b) Authorization for Plaque.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary of Agriculture may authorize the 
    installation and maintenance of a plaque on B-47 Ridge that--
            (A) memorializes the 1962 crash of the B-47 aircraft at the 
        site; and
            (B) may include the names of the victims of the crash.
        (2) Authorized terms and conditions.--The Secretary of 
    Agriculture may include any terms and conditions in the 
    authorization for a plaque under paragraph (1) that the Secretary 
    of Agriculture determines to be necessary.
        (3) Funding.--No Federal funds may be used to design, procure, 
    install, or maintain the plaque authorized under paragraph (1).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
|                                    |   |   |   |   | 10/1/05- |   |   | 2/17/06- |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|----------|--------|--------|----------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                    |   | 2005   |   |   | 2/16/06  |   |   | 09/30/06 |   |   | 2007   |   |   | 2008   |   |
| Earnings:                               |   |   |   |   |     |   |   |     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Income      (loss) before taxes         |   |   | 47.8   |   |     |   | 19.3   |     |   |   | -51.1  |   |   |   | -207.5 |   |   |   | -150.3 |   |
| Interest                                |   |   | 16.7   |   |     |   | 7.6    |     |   |   | 46.5   |   |   |   | 237.6  |   |   |   | 261.7 |   |
| Interest      portion of rental expense |   |   | 3.4    |   |     |   | 0.9    |     |   |   | 2.2    |   |   |   | 14.7   |   |   |   | 19.4 |   |
|                                    |   |   | 67.9   |   |     |   | 27.8   |     |   |   | -2.4   |   |   |   | 44.8   |   |   |   | 130.8 |   |
|                                    |   |   |   |   |     |   |   |     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed      Charges:                     |   |   |   |   |     |   |   |     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest                                |   |   | 16.7   |   |     |   | 7.6    |     |   |   | 46.5   |   |   |   | 237.6  |   |   |   | 261.7 |   |
| Interest      capitalized               |   |   | 0.0    |   |     |   | 0.0    |     |   |   | -0.6   |   |   |   | -1.5   |   |   |   | -2.3 |   |
| Interest      portion of rental expense |   |   | 3.4    |   |     |   | 0.9    |     |   |   | 2.2    |   |   |   | 14.7   |   |   |   | 19.4 |   |
|                                    |   |   | 20.1   |   |     |   | 8.5    |     |   |   | 48.1   |   |   |   | 250.8  |   |   |   | 278.8 |   |
|                                    |   |   |   |   |     |   |   |     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio                                   |   |   | 3.4    |   |     |   | 3.3    |     |   |   | 0.0    |   |   |   | 0.2    |   |   |   | 0.5 |   |
|                                    |   |   |   |   |     |   |   |     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Shortfall      (overage)                |   |   | -47.8  |   |     |   | -19.3  |     |   |   | 50.5   |   |   |   | 206.0  |   |   |   | 148.0 |   |
\RTMEWT OF 

^SPORWION 

: i OPERATiONS 

J U L 

SERVED JUNE 30, 2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2011-0296 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

This matter will not be heard prior to September 1, 2011. 

WHEREFORE, Paragraphs #2 and #3 of the Procedural Order are amended as 

follows': 

... On or before September 1, 2011, the parties shall conclude all discovery 

including, but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to 

production requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a 

discovery dispute they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution 

in a timely manner... 

1 M h 2C 

' The Administrator's civil penalty decisions, along with indexes of the decisions, the Rules of Practice, as 

well as other materials relating to civil penalty cases, are available on the internet at: 

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquartersj3ffices/agc/pol_adjudication/agc400/civil_penalty/; see 

also: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gOv/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrhrowse/Titlel4/]4tab_02.tpl. In 

addition, Thomson Reuters/West Publishmg publishes Federal Aviation Decisions. Finally, the decisions 

are available through LEXIS (TRANS library) and WestLaw 9FTRAN-FAA database). For additional 

information, see the Web site. 

1 
... NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the parties shall be prepared to present this case 

at a hearing on or after September 1, 2011^, subject to the availability of 

courtroom facilities... 

Attachment - Service List 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

^ 14 C.F.R. § 13.221 states: "The administrative law jud^^udU give each party at least 60 days notice of 

the date, time and location of the hearing." 
FDMS No. FAA-2011-0296 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Francis C. Heil, Respondent's Counsel 

Legal Department 

P.O. Box 619616 

Mail Drop 5675 

DFW Airport, TX 75261-9616 

TEL: 202-496-5642 

FAX; 202-496-5660 

Rena M. Price, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Safety Enforcement Branch 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E1, RMP 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 

Fort Worth, TX 76137-0007 

TEL: 817-222-5068 

FAX: 817-222-5945/5092 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S. E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 2 -
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

KALVIN BISHOP,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 

PHILADELPHIA,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Nos. 3 and 4 EM 2024

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of May, 2024, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the “Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary 

Relief” is DENIED.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 3.3


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       TO

                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                          LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION




          The undersigned President and Secretary of Lancaster Colony
Corporation, an Ohio corporation, hereby certify that the shareholders of the
corporation, by majority affirmative vote at a meeting of shareholders duly
called for such purpose on November 17, 1997, have duly adopted the following
resolution to amend the corporation's articles of incorporation:

          RESOLVED that the first paragraph of Article FOURTH of the
          corporation's articles of incorporation be, and hereby is, amended to
          read as follows:

          "FOURTH: The amount of the total authorized capital stock which the
          Corporation shall have the authority to issue is Seventy-Eight
          Million Fifty Thousand (78,050,000) shares, consisting of Seventy Five
          Million (75,000,000) shares of Common Stock (the "Common Stock") which
          are common shares without par value, Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand
          (750,000) shares of Class A Participating Preferred Stock ("Class A
          Preferred Stock") which are preferred shares with $1.00 par value, One
          Million One Hundred Fifty Thousand (1,150,000) shares of Class B
          Voting Preferred Stock ("Class B Preferred Stock") which are preferred
          shares without par value, and One Million One Hundred Fifty Thousand
          (1,150,000) shares of Class C Nonvoting Preferred Stock ("Class C
          Preferred Stock") which are preferred shares without par value."

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the President and Secretary, acting for and on
behalf of said corporation, have signed their names to this certificate on
November 24, 1997.



                                                /s/ John B. Gerlach, Jr.
                                                -------------------------------
                                                John B. Gerlach, Jr., President



                                                /s/ David M. Segal
                                                -------------------------------
                                                David M. Segal, Secretary
###### Editorial Note on Subpart Z of Part 1910

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1910 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

#### § 1910.1010 Benzidine.

See § 1910.1003, *13 carcinogens.*

[61 FR 9245, Mar. 7, 1996]