alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GEORG EDUNBAR , MEMBE R

56T H LEGISLATIV EDISTRIC T Pen nTownshi p Offic e Pin e Center , Suite 4 209 0 Harriso nAvenu e (Rout e 130 ) Jeannette , P

A 1564 4 Phone : (724 ) 744-030 5 NorthHuntingdo nOffic e 1259 1 Rout e 3 0 NorthHuntingdon , P

A 1564 2 Phone:(724)863-158 5 COMMITTEE S Gamin g Oversigh t Financ e Loca l Governmen t State Governmen t
Commonwealt ho f

Pennsylvani a Harrisbur g

e n ] > „ 0 -t-, ; -<^

-

:^—~sCI>'— ^
C D Jul y 18 , 201 1 Aloh a Le y Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Program , X-5 5 US Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAve. , S E Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 Dea rMs
. Ley : I t i s m ypleasur e t o offe rm ysuppor t t o th e Westmorelan d Count yAirpor t Authority' s reques t fo rfinancia l subsid ythroug h th e US Departmen t o fTransportation' s Smal l Communit yAi r Servic e Developmen t Program
. I t i s m yunderstandin g th e fund s wil l b e use d t o expan d th e schedule d ai rservic e tha t has show n exceptiona l potentia l a t Arnol d Palme rRegiona l Airport
. Th e Authorit yhas see n remarkabl e achievemen t wit h th e launc h o fSpiri t Airline s servic e t o Ft
. Lauderdale , F

L an d Myrtl e Beach , SC , attractin g mor e tha n 30,00 0 passengers throug h Arnol d Palme rRegiona l i n les s tha n fiv e months
. Loa d factor s hav e prove n unmatche d a t th e airport , wit h average s bein g i n th e hig h 80 % an d mi d 90 % ranges . Th e airlin e i s no wconsiderin g additiona l destination s t o augmen t thi s thrivin g operation , an d ask s onl yfo rassistanc e i n marketin g th e ne wroutes
. Thes e effort s ar e heavil ydependen t upo n th e trie d an d tru e marketin g effort s tha t th e airlin e has prove n successful
. Gran t fundin g throug h th e SCASD progra m i s critica l t o supportin g thes e effort s t o expan d servic e an d bolste ra priceles s economi casse t t o th e communitie s th e airpor t serves .You rfavorabl e revie wo fth e applicatio n woul d b e greatl yappreciated
. I f yo u hav e furthe r

question s o rconcerns , pleas e d o no t hesitat e t o cal l m yoffice
. Sincerely , ncereiy , ^ ^ Georg e S Dunba r Member , P

AHous e o f Representative s GSD/lr z
#### Kelly Shay, by Her Parent and Natural Guardian, James Shay, et al., Appellants, v John Schultz, Jr., Defendant, and Town of Mt. Hope, Respondent.

[698 NYS2d 901]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated September 10, 1998, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Town of Mt. Hope which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the defendant Town of Mt. Hope. O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group Population Research Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         June 12-13, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         7:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jon M. Ranhand, Health Scientist Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Blvd., rm. 5E01, MSC 7510, Bethesda, MD 20892; (301) 435-6884.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 16, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-12887  Filed 5-22-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Lancer
Orthodontics, Inc. for the annual period ended May 31, 2002
(the Report) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof, I, Zackary Irani, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
    all material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.








/s/ Zackary Irani
    Zackary Irani
    Chief Executive Officer
13184

#### STATE v. WRIGHT

(159 S. E., 492)

*Messrs. J. R. Plynn*and *P. D. Barron,*for appellant,

*Mr. I. C. Blackwood, Solicitor,*and *Mr. S. R. Watt,*for the State.

June 23, 1931.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

The defendant was convicted at the September term, 1929, on the charge of assault and batery with intent to kill, and, from the sentence imposed, has appealed upon various exceptions.

We do not think that it is necessary to consider all of the-exceptions, as it appears that there was reversible error as complained of in the fifth exception, which was as follows r

> “Because his Honor erred in charging the jury as follows, with regard to the defense of self-defense, to wit:

> “ ‘No man can plead self-defense if he does any act, or if he uses towards another such language as is calculated, reasonably calculated, to bring on a difficulty, and does bring *65on or precipitate a difficulty. Of course, the jury is the sole judge whether said language was calculated to bring on a difficulty and did bring it on.’ ”

The evidence tends to show that the prosecuting witness made an insulting reference to the defendant’s daughter, and that the defendant resented such remark by applying an insulting remark to the prosecuting witness, which was calculated to and did bring on an attack by the prosecuting witness upon him. Under the case of *State v. Rowell,*75 S. C., 494, 56 S. E., 23, the rule is declared that one who uses such opprobrious language towards another which was calculated to and did bring on difficulty, in which the prosecuting witness was the immediate aggressor, the defendant would be deprived of the right of self-defense by reason of the use by him of the remarks referred to; we do not understand that this rule applies to the case where the insulting remarks of the defendant' were used in reply to similar remarks by the prosecuting witness; the charge, under the circumstances, applied the rule laid down in the *Rowell case*to the situation developed in the present case; the right of self-defense is not destroyed if the defendant should resent in harsh and indignant terms, even though they be such as are calculated to precipitate a difficulty, insulting remarks by the prosecutor.

The judgment of this Court is that the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed, and that the case be remanded to that Court for a new trial.

Mr. Chief Justice BeEase and Messrs. Justices Stabeer and Carter and Mr. Acting Associate Justice John I. Cosgrove concur.
#### Dairymen’s League Co-operative Association, Inc., Respondent, *v.*Frank Ferguson, Appellant.

Argued May 19, 1937;

decided June 1, 1937.

*587
      *Bartle Gorman*for appellant.

*Bradley Fuller*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughman, Finch and Rippet, JJ.
#### § 2704.309 Judicial review.

Judicial review of final Commission decisions on awards may be sought as provided in 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(2).
#### GERBICH v KINDERMAN

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No. 1818.

Decided November 19, 1928

Paul Howland and Edward Davis, Cleveland, for Gerbich.

Robt. R. Pierce, Cleveland, for Kinder-man.

Opinion by

SULLIVAN, P. J.

VICKERY & LEVINE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (IN THOUSANDS,
EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,884
<SECURITIES>                                    35,340
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,547
<ALLOWANCES>                                       200
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,809
<PP&E>                                           3,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (886)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,706
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,838
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,644
<SALES>                                         18,321
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,321
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,262
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,181)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,181)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,181)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.57)


</TABLE>
#### SWETLAND CO v BARNETT

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No. 10426.

Decided December 23, 1929

Messrs. Thompson, Hiñe & Flory, Cleveland, for Swetland Co.

Messrs. Lanza & Litt, Cleveland, for Barnett.

*75VICKERY, PJ.

We think the court was in error, — not that it deducted the $175-, because it seems to have been a vacation under the circumstances caused by the action on the part of the plaintiff company in turning off the lights and so in a measure amounted to an eviction by the defendant below, and we find no fault with the court in deducting $175 from the plaintiff’s claim,— but there is no evidence in the record to warrant an entering of a judgment on the counterclaim and, therefore, the court was in error with respect to this $220.06, it being within the power of the court to modify this entry and the facts being fully before us, we modify the judgment by adding to the plaintiff’s claim the $220.06 that was wrongfully deducted from it by the judgment on the counterclaim and affirm the judgment as modified so that the plaintiff will recover $311.17.

Sullivan and Levine, JJ., concur.
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   12-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1999
[CASH]                                         429,259
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                               429,259
[PP&E]                                         249,753
[DEPRECIATION]                                  11,048
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                 673,167
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          109,228
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                       614,648
[OTHER-SE]                                     123,530
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                   673,167
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                     0
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                              (606,764)
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                          (606,764)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                 (606,764)
[EPS-BASIC]                                     (0.07)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                   (0.07)
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING    FIRM**     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the    Registration Statements on    Form S-8    (Nos.    333-59210,333-71596,333-118113    and    333-130406)    and on    Form S-3    (Nos.    333-46055,33-38869,333-45377,    333-56873,    333-62156,333-69294,333-82212,333-121502,333-121504,333-125077,333-131393,333-135816,333-135962    and    333-137093)    of Vector Group Ltd. of our report dated February 29, 2008    relating to the financial statements, financial statement    schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of    internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness    of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in    this    Form 10-K. /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers    LLP     Miami, Florida    February 29, 2008
###### Editorial Note on Part 1926

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.1418 Authority to stop operation.

Whenever there is a concern as to safety, the operator must have the authority to stop and refuse to handle loads until a qualified person has determined that safety has been assured.
798 A.2d 725

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Anthony PRINCE, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted March 11, 2002.

Decided June 17, 2002.

Catherine Lynn Marshall, Grady Gervino, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Joseph C. Santaguida, for Anthony Prince.

Before ZAPPALA, C.J., and CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR and EAKIN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of June 2002, we GRANT the Commonwealth’s “Motion for Remand to Superior Court for *546Consideration of Appeal on the Merits, None of Which Implicate the Constitutionality of 18 Pa.C.S. § 6317.”

As we do not possess jurisdiction-pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 722(7), we hereby TRANSFER this case to the Superior Court. *See*Pa.R.A.P. 751(a).
Exhibit 11.
 Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings

 For the periods ended March 31                           1999            1998

 Diluted earnings per common share:

   Average common shares outstanding                    356,831          106,386



 Net income (loss)                                    $ 241,601            7,306
 Diluted earnings per share:                             $ 0.68           $ 0.07



 Basic earnings per common share:

   Average common shares outstanding                    356,831          106,386


 Net income (loss)                                    $ 241,601          $ 7,306

Basic earnings per share:                                 $0.68            $0.07
#### § 2520.104-42 Waiver of certain actuarial information in the annual report.

Under the authority of section 104(a)(2)(A) of ERISA, the requirement of section 103(d)(6) of ERISA that the annual report include as part of the actuarial statement (Schedule B)[1] the present value of all of the plan's liabilities for nonforfeitable pension benefits allocated by termination priority categories, as set forth in section 4044 of title IV of ERISA, and the actuarial assumptions used in these computations, is waived.

[44 FR 5446, Jan. 26, 1979]

###### Footnotes -
  2520.104-42

[1] Schedule B was filed as part of the original document.
§ 1604.10 Employment policies relating to pregnancy and childbirth. ( a ) A written or unwritten employment policy or practice which excludes from employment applicants or employees because of pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions is in prima facie violation of title VII.
( b ) Disabilities caused or contributed to by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, for all job-related purposes, shall be treated the same as disabilities caused or contributed to by other medical conditions, under any health or disability insurance or sick leave plan available in connection with employment. Written or unwritten employment policies and practices involving matters such as the commencement and duration of leave, the availability of extensions, the accrual of seniority and other benefits and privileges, reinstatement, and payment under any health or disability insurance or sick leave plan, formal or informal, shall be applied to disability due to pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions on the same terms and conditions as they are applied to other disabilities. Health insurance benefits for abortion, except where the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term or where medical complications have arisen from an abortion, are not required to be paid by an employer; nothing herein, however, precludes an employer from providing abortion benefits or otherwise affects bargaining agreements in regard to abortion.
( c ) Where the termination of an employee who is temporarily disabled is caused by an employment policy under which insufficient or no leave is available, such a termination violates the Act if it has a disparate impact on employees of one sex and is not justified by business necessity.
( d ) ( 1 ) Any fringe benefit program, or fund, or insurance program which is in effect on October 31, 1978, which does not treat women affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions the same as other persons not so affected but similar in their ability or inability to work, must be in compliance with the provisions of § 1604.10(b) by April 29, 1979. In order to come into compliance with the provisions of 1604.10(b), there can be no reduction of benefits or compensation which were in effect on October 31, 1978, before October 31, 1979 or the expiration of a collective bargaining agreement in effect on October 31, 1978, whichever is later.
( 2 ) Any fringe benefit program implemented after October 31, 1978, must comply with the provisions of § 1604.10(b) upon implementation.
[44 FR 23805, Apr. 20, 1979]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

FELIX CAPONE,

Petitioner

v.

AMERICAN HERITAGE FEDERAL CREDIT

UNION,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 361 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of January, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 10.9

Director Fee Arrangements for Fiscal Year 2006

 

Each non-employee director of Capitol Federal Financial (the "Company") receives an annual retainer, paid monthly, of $20,000 for his or her service on the board of directors of Capitol Federal Savings Bank (the "Bank") and $20,000 for his or her service on the Company's board of directors ($40,000 in total). No additional fees are paid for attending board or board committee meetings of either the Bank or the Company. 

Directors John C. Dicus, Chairman of the Board, and John B. Dicus, President and Chief Executive Officer, are each paid $24,000.