alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### A. L. MATHEANY et al., Respondents, v. HENRY S. REDDEN, Appellant.

Kansas City Court of Appeals,

April 1, 1912.

PRACTICE, APPELLATE: Failure to File Abstract of Record. Where the appellant fails to serve and file an abstract of the record within the time prescribed by the statutes and rules of procedure, his appeal cannot be considered.

Appeal from Macon Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *Nat M. Shelton,*Judge.

Appeal dismissed.

*Thomas F. Gatts*for appellant.

*Nelson & Bigger*for respondents.

*234JOHNSON, J.

The appeal in this case was brought here on a full transcript and the cause was docketed for hearing at the March term, 1912. Within the time prescribed by Rule 15', appellant filed with the clerk five copies of his “Statement, Brief and Argument” — a copy of which he had delivered to respondent more than twenty days before the date of hearing. Appellant has not filed in this court nor served on respondent a printed abstract of the record as required by Rule 15 and by section 2048, Revised Statutes 1909. The filing of a complete transcript does not dispense with the necessity of filing a printed abstract of the record. [Whiting v. Lead Co., 195 Mo. 509, and cases cited.] As is said in that case: “The mere opinion of counsel as to what the record is, expressed in the statement of appellant’s case, cannot be taken for an abstract. Counsel cannot thus evade the duty of making a correct abstract of the transcript to the verity of which their professional honor is pledged, or devolve that duty upon the court.”

Appellant filed a motion before the submission of the cause for leave to amend by striking out the word “Statement” from the title of the documents filed and substituting the word “Abstract” therefor. Such change of name would not make an abstract of what, in fact, as well as in name, is nothing but the attorney’s statement of the facts of the case without any of tbe essentials of an abstract. The plain fact is that appellant has failed to comply with the statutes and rules of procedure in a most vital particular and his appeal cannot be considered. Accordingly it is dismissed.

All concur.
Report to Congress on Wastes from the Combustion of Fossil Fuels

March 1999 3-17 

### sites. Compositing the concentrations of all compounds of interest using their respective 2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalency factors, the samples displayed 2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent concentrations from below detection to 2.1 ng/kg (approximately one order of magnitude above typical detection limits). By comparison, a reference sample of municipal waste incinerator fly ash had a 2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent concentration of 1,460 ng/kg (parts per trillion) (EPRI, 1998b). Coal contains and emits low levels of naturally occurring radiation (Radian, 1988). Concentrations of radionuclides in coal vary with coal rank and origin. For example, uranium and thorium concentrations in U.S. coals range from below 0.01 parts per million (ppm) to roughly 75 ppm, based on analyses of more than 6,000 samples (EPA, 1995c). However, the geometric mean concentrations of uranium and thorium for the same sample population are 1.2 ppm and 2.2 ppm, respectively. These concentrations correspond to activities of roughly 0.41 pCi/g and 0.24 pCi/g, respectively. Because they do not volatilize, these elements generally concentrate in coal ash, such that activity levels in the ash increase relative to the radioactivity in source coal (EPA, 1989a). EPA estimates an average increase of roughly 10×, such that average activity levels for curanium and thorium are 4 pCi/g and 2.4 pCi/g, respectively. **Constituent Managed in Surface Impoundments Managed in Landfills**  **Mean Range Mean Range** Arsenic 40 6.7–150 20 6.2–38 Barium 1,600 150–8,400 2,900 1,800–3,800 Beryllium 8.4 0.88–16 n/a n/a Boron 190 0.03–420 n/a n/a Cadmium 6 0.20–24 n/a n/a Chromium 85 5.7–290 50 35–78 Cobalt 29 4.7–42 n/a n/a Copper 78 2.2–150 105 97–120 Lead 42 5–150 17 6.5–29 Manganese 280 55–660 460 200–820 Nickel 68 1.5–160 51 33–65 Selenium 37 0.025–320 14 0.8–32 Silver 5.2 0.03–14 n/a n/a Thallium 27 10.6–48 n/a n/a Strontium 1,040 1–4,800 2,100 1,100–2,650 Vanadium 120 20–350 86 23–160 Zinc 150 17–860 84 35 *All measurements identified as below detection limit were assigned a value equal to one-half the detection limit for use in th e calculations. All concentrations are facility-averaged; i.e., multiple measurements from a single site are averaged, and the resulting popula tion of facility averages used to generate the statistics in this table. n/a = data not available Sources: EPRI, 1991, 1992, 1994a, 1994b, 1996a, 1996b, 1997c, 1997d, 1997e, 1997f, 1997g, 1997h, 1997i, 1997j, 1997k, and 1997 l 

### Table 3-8. Facility Average Concentrations of Trace Constituents in Comanaged Wastes (parts per million) (whole waste)*
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 57 FR 31451, July 16, 1992.

#### § 20.5 Examination of records relating to the claim; opportunity for full explanation of the claim.

Following receipt of the notice specified in § 20.4, the debtor may request to examine and copy the information to be disclosed to the consumer credit reporting agency, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a.
§ 0.737-3 Initiation of administrative disciplinary hearing. ( a ) Any person may, in writing, report an apparent violation of 18 U.S.C. 207(a), (b) or (c) or the regulations of the Office of Personnel Management at 5 CFR part 737 by a former employee described in § 0.737-1 to the Solicitor of Labor.
( b ) On receipt of information regarding a possible violation of 18 U.S.C. 207, and after determining that such information appears to be substantiated, the Solicitor shall expeditiously provide such information, along with any comments or agency regulations, to the Office of the Inspector General, the Director of the Office of Government Ethics and to the Criminal Division, Department of Justice.
( c ) Whenever the Solicitor has determined after appropriate review that there is reasonable cause to believe that a former employee described in § 0.737-1 has violated 18 U.S.C. 207(a), (b) or (c) or the regulations of the Office of Personnel Management at 5 CFR part 737, the Solicitor may initiate an administrative disciplinary proceeding by providing the former employee with a notice of alleged violation.
( d ) The notice of alleged violation shall include: ( 1 ) A statement of allegations (and the basis thereof) sufficiently detailed to enable the former employee to prepare an adequate defense;
( 2 ) Notification of the right to a hearing; and
( 3 ) An explanation of the method by which a hearing may be requested.
§ 36.225 Educational institutions eligible to submit transition plans. ( a ) *Application.* This section applies to each educational institution to which §§ 36.300 through 36.310 apply that: ( 1 ) Admitted students of only one sex as regular students as of June 23, 1972; or
( 2 ) Admitted students of only one sex as regular students as of June 23, 1965, but thereafter admitted, as regular students, students of the sex not admitted prior to June 23, 1965.
( b ) *Provision for transition plans.* An educational institution to which this section applies shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in admission or recruitment in violation of §§ 36.300 through 36.310.
§ 2570.171 Procedures for review by the Secretary. ( a ) Upon receipt of the notice of appeal, the Secretary shall establish a briefing schedule which shall be served on all parties of record. Upon motion of one or more of the parties, the Secretary may, in his or her discretion, permit the submission of reply briefs.
( b ) The Secretary shall issue a decision as promptly as possible after receipt of the briefs of the parties. The Secretary may affirm, modify, or set aside, in whole or in part, the decision on appeal and shall issue a statement of reasons and bases for the action(s) taken. Such decision by the Secretary shall be final agency action within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 704.
§ 38.52 Governor's liability for actions of recipients the Governor has financially assisted under Title I of WIOA. ( a ) The Governor and the recipient are jointly and severally liable for all violations of the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIOA and this part by the recipient, unless the Governor has: ( 1 ) Established and implemented a Nondiscrimination Plan, under § 38.54, designed to give a reasonable guarantee of the recipient's compliance with such provisions;
( 2 ) Entered into a written contract with the recipient that clearly establishes the recipient's obligations regarding nondiscrimination and equal opportunity;
( 3 ) Acted with due diligence to monitor the recipient's compliance with these provisions; and
( 4 ) Taken prompt and appropriate corrective action to effect compliance.
( b ) If the Director determines that the Governor has demonstrated substantial compliance with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, the Director may recommend to the Secretary that the imposition of sanctions against the Governor be waived and that sanctions be imposed only against the noncomplying recipient.
§ 2520.104a-6 Annual reporting for plans which are part of a group insurance arrangement. ( a ) *General.* A trust or other entity described in § 2520.104-43(b) that files an annual report in accordance with the terms of subsections (b) and (c) shall be deemed to have filed such report in accordance with § 2520.104a-6 for purposes of § 2520.104-43.
( b ) *Date of filing.* The annual report shall be filed within: ( 1 ) Eleven and one-half months after the close of the fiscal year of the trust or other entity described in § 2520.104-43 which begins in 1975 or December 15, 1977, whichever is later; and
( 2 ) Seven months after the close of the fiscal year of the trust or other entity which begins after December 31, 1975, unless extended. See “When to file” instructions of the appropriate Annual Return/Report Form.
( c ) *Where to file.* The annual report prescribed in § 2520.103-2 shall be filed in accordance with and at the address provided in the instructions to the Annual Return/Report Form.
[43 FR 10152, Mar. 10, 1978; 43 FR 14010, Apr. 4, 1978]
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-03-214-CV

STEVEN C. JENKINS	APPELLANT

	V.

RUTH RUSSELL AND	APPELLEES

CONRAD BREDLEAU

	------------

	FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Steven C. Jenkins filed a timely notice of appeal indicating that he wished to appeal from a contempt judgment.  We sent Appellant a letter stating our concern that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because contempt judgments are usually not appealable.2  We requested that Appellant respond to the question of whether an appeal is proper in his case.  He has not done so.  The contempt judgment is not appealable.3  We therefore dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.4

									PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  October 16, 2003
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 21













                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY




     Name of Subsidiary            State of         Percent Owned
                                 Incorporation

LaBarge, Inc.                     Delaware              100%
LaBarge/STC, Inc.                    Texas              100%
LaBarge Properties, Inc.          Missouri              100%
LaBarge-OCS, Inc.                 Delaware              100%
LaBarge Wireless, Inc.            Missouri              100%
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 23(a)















                          Independent Auditors' Consent




  The Board of Directors
  LaBarge, Inc.:


  We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
  No. 33-53583 and No. 33-31330 on Form S-8 of LaBarge, Inc. of our report
  dated August 21, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
  LaBarge, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2002 and July 1, 2001, and
  the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
  and cash flows, and related schedule for each of the years in the three-
  year period ended June 30, 2002, which report appears in the June 30,
  2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K of LaBarge, Inc.

  Our  report  refers  to  a  change in accounting for  goodwill  and  other
  intangible assets.






  /s/KPMG LLP
  St. Louis, Missouri
  September 13, 2002
#### WILLOUGHBY (village) v MALONE

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21977.

Decided April 23, 1930

Kinkade, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. Marshall, CJ., not participating.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4839 

To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide support to university 

law school programs that are designed to provide legal assistance to 

veterans, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 21 (legislative day, OCTOBER 19), 2020 

Mrs. SHAHEEN (for herself, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, and Mr. WARNER) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide 

support to university law school programs that are designed to provide legal assistance to veterans, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Legal Sup5 port Act of 2020’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4839 IS

1 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS SUPPORT 

2 FOR UNIVERSITY LEGAL CLINICS THAT AS3 SIST VETERANS. 

4 (a) SUPPORT AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of Vet5 erans Affairs may provide support to one or more univer6 sity law school programs that are designed to provide legal 

7 assistance to veterans. 

8 (b) ELIGIBLE PROGRAMS.—Programs of university 

9 law schools which may receive support under subsection 

10 (a) may include programs that assist veterans with— 

11 (1) filing and appealing claims for benefits 

12 under laws administered by the Secretary; and 

13 (2) such other civil, criminal, and family legal 

14 matters as the Secretary considers appropriate. 

15 (c) FINANCIAL SUPPORT.— 

16 (1) IN GENERAL.—The support provided a pro17 gram under subsection (a) may include financial 

18 support of the program. 

19 (2) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT.—The total 

20 amount of financial support provided under sub21 section (a) in any fiscal year may not exceed 

22 $2,000,000. 

23 (3) FUNDING.—Amounts for financial support 

24 under subsection (a) shall be derived from amounts 

25 appropriated or otherwise made available to the 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4839 IS

1 General Operating Expenses account of the Veterans 

2 Benefits Administration. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,182
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    317,989
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,271
<PP&E>                                       9,536,147
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,870,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,137,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,527,863
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,202,065
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,682,035)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,137,893
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             440,685
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,106,663)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,106,663)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,106,663)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        




</TABLE>
#### § 2570.100 Scope of review.

The review of the Secretary shall not be a *de novo* proceeding but rather a review of the record established before the administrative law judge. There shall be no opportunity for oral argument.
§ 1919.76 Safe working load reduction. ( a ) If the operation in which equipment is engaged never utilizes more than a fraction of the safe working load rating, the owner of such equipment may, at his option, have the crane or derrick certificated for and operated at a lesser maximum safe working load in keeping with the use and based on radius and other pertinent factors: *Provided, however,* That the equipment concerned is physically capable of operation at the original load rating and the load reduction is not for the purpose of avoiding correction of any deficiency.
EXHIBIT
31.2




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF




THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Beth
B. Hood, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of North American Galvanizing &
Coatings, Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this annual report;




3. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;




(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




/s/ Beth B. Hood


Beth B.
Hood


Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer




April 30,
2009
#### HARTANG v BUCHHOLZ

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist,. Erie Co

No 321.

Decided April 19, 1930

John F. McCrystal, Sandusky, for Hartang.

King Ramsey & Flyn, Sandusky, for Buchholz.

*310RICHARDS, J.

It is urged that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence in turning to the left to cross the Main Market Road as he had seen a car approaching 250 to 300 feet distant and without giving any signal, but according to the evidence oil the plaintiff and his wife, their car had crossed the line of traffic on a main highway in safety and was struck by the defendant’s car *to*the south of said highway and the defendant, in order to strike plaintiff’s car at that point, must have veered to his right, off the main road. Under these circumstances we think there was sufficient evidence to have carried the case to the jury.

The judgment will therefore be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Williams and Lloyd, JJ., concur.