alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Application to Amend 

Section 333 Exemption No. 11306 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-1023 

June 15, 2015 

Petitioner: 

Hawk Aerial, LLC 

Kevin J. Gould, CEO 

114 Homesteads Rd. 

Placitas, NM 87043 

Cell: 425-218-3723 

Email: kevin.gould@hawkaerial.com 

Website: www.hawkaerial.com 

Greetings, 

By letter from the FAA dated AprilS, 2015, an exemption was granted to Hawk Aerial for relief under 

Section 333. That letter was marked Section 333 Exemption No. 11306 Regulatory Docket No. FAA2014-1023. 

By letter from the FAA dated June 3, 2015, the above exemption was amended to include the DJI 

Phantom 3 models. 

Hawk Aerial hereby requests that the exemption so granted and amended, be now further amended to 

include the PreNav 1.0 aircraft. 

• Attached is the Aircraft Flight Manual for the PreNav 1.0 aircraft. It contains the following: 

o General Information 

o Operating Limitations 

o Normal Procedures 

o Emergency Procedures 

o Aircraft and Systems Description 

o Handling, Service and Maintenance Procedures 

• The findings, rationale, conclusions and conditions contained in the FAA's Exemption No. 11306, 

as amended, apply to this application to include the PreNav 1.0 model in Exemption No. 11306. 

Thank you for your consideration of this important request. Please advise us of any additional 

information that is required. 

Kevin J. Gaul 

~~d Airman Certificate #2830326 

CEO, Hawk Aerial LLC
§ 1982.100 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part implements procedures of the National Transit Systems Security Act (NTSSA), 6 U.S.C. 1142, and the Federal Railroad Safety Act (FRSA), 49 U.S.C. 20109, as amended. NTSSA provides for employee protection from retaliation because the employee has engaged in protected activity pertaining to public transportation safety or security (or, in circumstances covered by the statute, the employee is perceived to have engaged or to be about to engage in protected activity). FRSA provides for employee protection from retaliation because the employee has engaged in protected activity pertaining to railroad safety or security (or, in circumstances covered by the statute, the employee is perceived to have engaged or to be about to engage in protected activity), has requested medical or first aid treatment, or has followed orders or a treatment plan of a treating physician. It also protects an employee against delay, denial or interference with first aid or medical treatment for a workplace injury.
( b ) This part establishes procedures under NTSSA and FRSA for the expeditious handling of retaliation complaints filed by employees, or by persons acting on their behalf, and sets forth the Secretary's interpretations of NTSSA and FRSA on certain statutory issues. These rules, together with those codified at 29 CFR part 18, set forth the procedures under NTSSA or FRSA for submission of complaints, investigations, issuance of findings and preliminary orders, objections to findings and orders, litigation before administrative law judges, post-hearing administrative review, and withdrawals and settlements.
```

[House Document 113-145]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

113th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 113-145

 
 CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO EXPORT CONTROL 
                              REGULATIONS

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

   A CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY REGARDING EXPORT CONTROL 
               REGULATIONS, PURSUANT TO 50 U.S.C. 1622(d)

 September 8, 2014.--Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 
                         ordered to be printed
                                           The White House,
                                        Washington, August 7, 2014.
Hon. John Boehner,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: Section 202(d) of the National 
Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)) provides for the automatic 
termination of a national emergency unless, within the 90-day 
period prior to the anniversary date of its declaration, the 
President publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to 
the Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue 
in effect beyond the anniversary date. In accordance with this 
provision, I have sent to the Federal Register for publication 
the enclosed notice, stating that the national emergency in 
light of the expiration of the Export Administration Act of 
1979, is to continue in effect for 1 year beyond August 17, 
2014.
            Sincerely,
                                                      Barack Obama.
                                 Notice

                              ----------                              

 Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Export Control 
                              Regulations

    On August 17, 2001, consistent with the authority provided 
to the President under the International Emergency Economic 
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the President issued 
Executive Order 13222. In that order, he declared a national 
emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat 
to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the 
United States in light of the expiration of the Export 
Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2401 et seq.). 
Because the Export Administration Act has not been renewed by 
the Congress, the national emergency declared on August 17, 
2001, must continue in effect beyond August 17, 2014. 
Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National 
Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year 
the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13222.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and 
transmitted to the Congress.

                                                      Barack Obama.
    The White House, August 7, 2014.

                                  

```
#### § 2.25 Subpoenas served upon employees of the Office of the Inspector General.

Notwithstanding the requirements set forth in §§ 2.20 through 2.24, this subpart is applicable to demands served on employees or former employees of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG), except that wherever in §§ 2.21 through 2.24 there appear the phrases *appropriate Office of the Solicitor, Associate Solicitor, Regional Solicitor, or Associate Regional Solicitor,* and *appropriate Deputy Solicitor of Labor,* there shall be substituted in lieu thereof *the Inspector General or Deputy Inspector General.* In addition, the first sentence of § 2.22 shall not be applicable to subpoenas served upon employees or former employees of the Office of the Inspector General.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly of American Sports Development Group Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Matt Horn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Matt Horn
-------------
Matt Horn
Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  May 20, 2003
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ABRAHAM PORTNOV, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) Civil Action No. 20-1611 (UNA)

 ) 

) 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al., ) 

 ) 

Defendants. ) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff’s pro se complaint and 

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application and 

dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) 

(requiring the court to dismiss an action “at any time” it determines that subject matter 

jurisdiction is wanting). 

“Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. They possess only that power 

authorized by Constitution and statute,” and it is “presumed that a cause lies outside this limited 

jurisdiction.” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994) (citations 

omitted). A party seeking relief in the district court must at least plead facts that bring the suit 

within the court’s jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to plead such facts warrants 

dismissal of the action. 

The complaint is unclear, but it seems to seek review of decisions rendered by the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States Court of Federal Claims, or 

6/29/2020 
2

some sort of intervention in proceedings that are or were before those courts. See Compl. at 3 (“I 

am asking the Court to finish my six years fighting for truth by scheduling the trial with jury.”)

This federal district court lacks jurisdiction to review another court’s decisions and order 

it to take any action. See United States v. Choi, 818 F. Supp. 2d 79, 85 (D.D.C. 2011) (district 

courts “generally lack[] appellate jurisdiction over other judicial bodies, and cannot exercise 

appellate mandamus over other courts.”) (citing Lewis v. Green, 629 F. Supp. 546, 553 (D.D.C. 

1986)); accord Atchison v. U.S. Dist. Courts, 240 F. Supp. 3d 121, 126, n.6 (D.D.C. 2017) (“It is 

a well-established principle that a district court can neither review the decisions of its sister court 

nor compel it to act.”). Moreover, it is axiomatic that a lower federal court has no authority over 

an appellate court. In re Marin, 956 F.2d 339, 340 (D.C. Cir. 1992 ) (per curiam) (internal 

quotation marks and citation omitted)). Therefore, this case will be dismissed. A separate order

accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. 

SIGNED: EMMET G. SULLIVAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DATE: June 29, 2020
# Publicatieblad C 198/5 au

| | ISSN 1725-2474 |
| --- | --- |
| Publicatieblad
  van de Europese Unie | C 198 |
| | |
| Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal | Mededelingen en bekendmakingen | 47e jaargang5 augustus 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2474

Publicatieblad

van de Europese Unie

C 198

Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal

Mededelingen en bekendmakingen

47e jaargang5 augustus 2004

---

| Nummer | Inhoud | Bladzijde |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Mededelingen |
| | Commissie |
| 2004/C 198/1 | Wisselkoersen van de euro | 1 |

Nummer

Inhoud

Bladzijde

I   Mededelingen

Commissie

2004/C 198/1

Wisselkoersen van de euro

1

| NL | |
| --- | --- |

NL

---

I Mededelingen

Commissie

| 5.8.2004 | NL | Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie | C 198/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2004

NL

Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie

C 198/1

---

Wisselkoersen van de euro (1)

4 augustus 2004

(2004/C 198/01)

1 euro=

| | Munteenheid | Koers |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US-dollar | 1,1983 |
| JPY | Japanse yen | 133,72 |
| DKK | Deense kroon | 7,4352 |
| GBP | Pond sterling | 0,65960 |
| SEK | Zweedse kroon | 9,1938 |
| CHF | Zwitserse frank | 1,5394 |
| ISK | IJslandse kroon | 86,33 |
| NOK | Noorse kroon | 8,4145 |
| BGN | Bulgaarse lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cypriotische pond | 0,57940 |
| CZK | Tsjechische koruna | 31,769 |
| EEK | Estlandse kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hongaarse forint | 250,14 |
| LTL | Litouwse litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Letlandse lat | 0,6527 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4245 |
| PLN | Poolse zloty | 4,4350 |
| ROL | Roemeense leu | 40 954 |
| SIT | Sloveense tolar | 240,0100 |
| SKK | Slovaakse koruna | 40,120 |
| TRL | Turkse lira | 1 782 400 |
| AUD | Australische dollar | 1,7079 |
| CAD | Canadese dollar | 1,5844 |
| HKD | Hongkongse dollar | 9,3465 |
| NZD | Nieuw-Zeelandse dollar | 1,8624 |
| SGD | Singaporese dollar | 2,0667 |
| KRW | Zuid-Koreaanse won | 1 399,08 |
| ZAR | Zuid-Afrikaanse rand | 7,5483 |

Munteenheid

Koers

USD

US-dollar

1,1983

JPY

Japanse yen

133,72

DKK

Deense kroon

7,4352

GBP

Pond sterling

0,65960

SEK

Zweedse kroon

9,1938

CHF

Zwitserse frank

1,5394

ISK

IJslandse kroon

86,33

NOK

Noorse kroon

8,4145

BGN

Bulgaarse lev

1,9558

CYP

Cypriotische pond

0,57940

CZK

Tsjechische koruna

31,769

EEK

Estlandse kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hongaarse forint

250,14

LTL

Litouwse litas

3,4528

LVL

Letlandse lat

0,6527

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4245

PLN

Poolse zloty

4,4350

ROL

Roemeense leu

40 954

SIT

Sloveense tolar

240,0100

SKK

Slovaakse koruna

40,120

TRL

Turkse lira

1 782 400

AUD

Australische dollar

1,7079

CAD

Canadese dollar

1,5844

HKD

Hongkongse dollar

9,3465

NZD

Nieuw-Zeelandse dollar

1,8624

SGD

Singaporese dollar

2,0667

KRW

Zuid-Koreaanse won

1 399,08

ZAR

Zuid-Afrikaanse rand

7,5483

---

(1)

Bron: door de Europese Centrale Bank gepubliceerde referentiekoers.

---
-78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0 -75.5

38.5 39.0 39.5 

### ★
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 09/05 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 05 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.03 N 77.49 WMeters AGL
No. 76-6478.

#### Hines *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
§ 37.104 What information must a Notification of Breach of Conciliation Agreement contain? A Notification of Breach of Conciliation Agreement must: ( a ) Specify any efforts made to achieve voluntary compliance, and indicate that those efforts have been unsuccessful;
( b ) Identify the specific provisions of the Conciliation Agreement violated;
( c ) Determine liability for the violation and the extent of the liability;
( d ) Indicate that failure of the violating party to come into compliance within 10 days of the receipt of the Notification of Breach of Conciliation Agreement may result, after opportunity for a hearing, in the termination or denial of the grant, or discontinuation of assistance, as appropriate, or in referral to the Department of Justice with a request from the Department to file suit;
( e ) Advise the violating party of the right to request a hearing, and reference the applicable procedures in § 37.111; and
( f ) Include a determination as to the Governor's liability, if any, in accordance with the provisions of § 37.52.
----

----

I Communications

Commission

----

Taux de change de l'euro (1)

20 juillet 2004

(2004/C 186/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: taux de change de référence publié par la Banque centrale européenne.

----

----

Communication concernant l'adjudication de la subvention à l'expédition de riz décortiqué à grains longs B vers l'île de la Réunion

(2004/C 186/02)

Le règlement (CE) no 1275/2004 de la Commission (JO L 241 du 13.7.2004, p. 8) a prolongé l'adjudication de la subvention à l'expédition de riz décortiqué à grains longs B vers l'île de la Réunion ouverte par le règlement (CE) no 1878/2003 de la Commission (JO L 275 du 25.10.2003, p. 23).

Toutefois, pour des raisons techniques, la modification de l'avis d'adjudication (JO C 257 du 25.10.2003, p. 8) prévoyant les dates de dépôt des offres ne peut être publié dans les délais. Dans ces conditions, la prolongation de l'adjudication ne peut s'appliquer.

----

Rectificatifs

----

Rectificatif à la non-opposition à une concentration notifiée (Affaire no COMP/M.3392 — WESTLB/KLÖCKNER)

(«Journal officiel de l'Union européenne» C 170 du 30 juin 2004)

(2004/C 186/03)

Page 2, premier alinéa, troisième phrase:

au lieu de:

«Le texte intégral de la décision est disponible seulement en anglais et sera rendu public après suppression des secrets d'affaires qu'il puisse contenir.»

lire:

«Le texte intégral de la décision est disponible seulement en allemand et sera rendu public après suppression des secrets d'affaires qu'il puisse contenir.»

----

----

Rectificatif à l'avis de la Banque centrale européenne du 16 avril 2004 sollicité par le Conseil de l'Union européenne sur une proposition de règlement du Conseil concernant les médailles et les jetons similaires aux pièces en euros (COM(2004) 39 final)

(CON/2004/13)

(2004/C 186/04)

(«Journal officiel de l'Union européenne» C 134 du 12 mai 2004)

Page 11, point 3, à la troisième ligne:

au lieu de:

«[...] du symbole de l'euro (IJ) sur les objets métalliques [...]»

lire:

«[...] du symbole de l'euro (€) sur les objets métalliques [...]».

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 57 FR 31451, July 16, 1992.

#### § 20.6 Opportunity for repayment.

The Department of Labor agency responsible for collecting the claim shall afford the debtor the opportunity to repay the debt or enter into a repayment plan which is agreeable to the head of the agency and is in a written form signed by such debtor. The head of the agency (or designee) may deem a repayment plan to be abrogated if the debtor should, after the repayment plan is signed, fail to comply with the terms of the plan.
# Az Európai Unió C 194A/2004

| | ISSN 1725-518X |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 194A |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 47. évfolyam2004. július 30. |

ISSN 1725-518X

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 194A

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

47. évfolyam2004. július 30.

---

| Közleményszám | Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Közlemények |
| | Tanács |
| 2004/C 194A/1 | Állásajánlat — Európai Védelmi Ügynökség — Igazgató | 1 |
| | A Rasszizmus és Idegengyűlölet Európai Megfigyelőközpontja |
| 2004/C 194A/2 | Pályázati felhívás HOUA-A-2004 | 2 |

Közleményszám

Tartalom

Oldal

III   Közlemények

Tanács

2004/C 194A/1

Állásajánlat — Európai Védelmi Ügynökség — Igazgató

1

A Rasszizmus és Idegengyűlölet Európai Megfigyelőközpontja

2004/C 194A/2

Pályázati felhívás HOUA-A-2004

2

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

III Közlemények

Tanács

| 30.7.2004 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CA 194/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2004

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CA 194/1

---

ÁLLÁSAJÁNLAT

Európai védelmi ügynökség

Igazgató

(2004/C 194 A/01)

Az Európai Védelmi Ügynökség négy igazgatói állást hirdet meg a következő négy igazgatóságán:

| — | Katonai képességfejlesztés (Hiv.: EDA/A/2004/012), |
| --- | --- |

—

Katonai képességfejlesztés (Hiv.: EDA/A/2004/012),

| — | Kutatás és technológia (Hiv.: EDA/A/2004/0029), |
| --- | --- |

—

Kutatás és technológia (Hiv.: EDA/A/2004/0029),

| — | Fegyverkezés (Hiv.: EDA/A/2004/042), |
| --- | --- |

—

Fegyverkezés (Hiv.: EDA/A/2004/042),

| — | Hadiipar és -piac (Hiv.: EDA/A/2004/051). |
| --- | --- |

—

Hadiipar és -piac (Hiv.: EDA/A/2004/051).

Részletes információ (angol nyelven), valamint a pályázati formanyomtatvány a Tanácsnak az alábbi honlapján érhető el: http://ue.eu.int (kapcsolatok/állásajánlatok).

Határidő: 2004. szeptember 3., amelyet a postai bélyegző hitelesít.

---

A Rasszizmus és Idegengyűlölet Európai Megfigyelőközpontja

| 30.7.2004 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CA 194/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2004

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CA 194/2

---

PÁLYÁZATI FELHÍVÁS HOUA-A-2004

(2004/C 194 A/02)

A Rasszizmus és Idegengyűlölet Európai Megfigyelőközpontja (EUMC) pályázókat keres bizonyos munkakörök betöltésére. Az állásajánlatokról, a Központ tevékenységéről és a pályázati anyag összeállításához szükséges teendőkről szóló részletes tájékoztatás az EUMC honlapján található a következő címen: http://eumc.eu.int.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of WT Holdings Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Albert Wong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Albert Wong        
|                      |  |  |  | Albert Wong            
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Williams, Appellant.

[697 NYS2d 531]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Ort, J.), rendered March 18, 1997, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The showup identification procedure was not unduly suggestive (see, *People v Duuvon,*77 NY2d 541).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the evidence was legally sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim suffered a physical injury. As such, the defendant was properly convicted of robbery in the second degree, and it is not necessary to reduce the conviction to robbery in the third degree *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620; *People v Henderson,*92 NY2d 677).

The defendant was properly sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender *(see, People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662), and his sentence was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.