### 22746 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 83 / Friday, April 30, 2010 / Notices

MO Contracting Activity: GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, PUBLIC BUILDINGS SERVICE, ST. LOUIS, MO Service Type/Location: Mail Services, DFAS Retirement & Annuity Section (Cleveland, OH), AWRC, 2762 Rand Road, Indianapolis, IN

NPA: Anthony Wayne Rehabilitation Ctr for Handicapped and Blind, Inc., Fort Wayne, IN Contracting Activity: DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE (DFAS), CONTRACT SERVICES DIRECTORATE, COLUMBUS, OH

Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.

[FR Doc. 2010–10120 Filed 4–29–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6353–01–P**

**CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY**
**COMMISSION**

**[CPSC Docket No. CPSC–2010–0035]**

**Third Party Testing for Certain Children’s Products; Notice of**  **Requirements for Accreditation of Third Party Conformity Assessment**  **Bodies To Assess Conformity With Part 1505 and/or § 1500.86(a)(5) of Title**  **16, Code of Federal Regulations**

**AGENCY :**  Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice of requirements.

**SUMMARY :**  The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC or Commission) is issuing a notice of requirements that provides the criteria and process for Commission acceptance of accreditation of third party conformity assessment bodies for testing pursuant to specific CPSC regulations relating to electrically operated toys or other electrically operated articles intended for use by children, and/or clacker balls. The Commission is issuing this notice of requirements pursuant to section 14(a)(3)(B)(vi) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA) (15 U.S.C. 2063(a)(3)(B)(vi)).

**DATES :**  Effective Date: The requirements for accreditation of third party conformity assessment bodies to assess conformity with 16 CFR part 1505 and/ or 16 CFR 1500.86(a)(5) are effective upon publication of this notice in the Federal Register.

Comments in response to this notice of requirements should be submitted by June 1, 2010. Comments on this notice should be captioned ‘‘Notice of Requirements for Accreditation of Third Party Conformity Assessment Bodies to Assess Conformity With Part 1505 and/ or § 1500.86(a)(5) of Title 16, Code of Federal Regulations. ’’ **ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CPSC–2010– 0035 by any of the following methods:

Electronic Submissions: Submit electronic comments in the following way: Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. To ensure timely processing of comments, the Commission is no longer accepting comments submitted by electronic mail (e-mail) except through http://www.regulations.gov.

Written Submissions: Submit written submissions in the following ways: Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions) preferably in five copies, to: Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301) 504–7923.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. All comments received may be posted without change to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. Do not
submit confidential business information, trade secret information, or other sensitive or protected information (such as a social security number) electronically; if furnished at all, such
information should be submitted in writing.

Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to http:// www.regulations.gov.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Robert ‘‘Jay’’ Howell, Assistant Executive
Director for Hazard Identification and Reduction, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East WestHighway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814; email rhowell@cpsc.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

I. Introduction

Section 14(a)(3)(B)(vi) of the CPSA, as added by section 102(a)(2) of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA), Public Law 110– 314, directs the CPSC to publish a notice of requirements for accreditation of third party conformity assessment bodies to assess children’s products for conformity with ‘‘ other children’s product safety rules. ’’ Section 14(f)(1) of
the CPSA defines ‘‘ children’s product safety rule’’ as ‘‘ a consumer product safety rule under [the CPSA] or similar rule, regulation, standard, or ban under any other Act enforced by the Commission, including a rule declaring a consumer product to be a banned hazardous product or substance. ’’ Under section 14(a)(3)(A) of the CPSA, each manufacturer (including the importer) or private labeler of products subject to those regulations must have products
that are manufactured more than 90 days after the Federal Register publication date of a notice of the requirements for accreditation, tested by a third party conformity assessment body accredited to do so, and must issue a certificate of compliance with the applicable regulations based on that testing. Section 14(a)(2) of the CPSA, as added by section 102(a)(2) of the CPSIA, requires that certification be based on testing of sufficient samples of the product, or samples that are identical in all material respects to the product. The Commission also emphasizes that, irrespective of certification, the product in question must comply with applicable CPSC requirements (see, e.g., section 14(h) of the CPSA, as added by section 102(b) of the CPSIA).

The Commission also is recognizing
limited circumstances in which it will accept certifications based on product testing conducted before the third party conformity assessment body is accepted as accredited by the CPSC. The details regarding those limited circumstances can be found in part IV of this document
below.

This notice provides the criteria and process for Commission acceptance of accreditation of third party conformity assessment bodies for testing pursuant to the following test methods:

• The test methods for electrically operated toys or other electrically operated articles intended for use by children at 16 CFR Part 1505, Requirements for Electrically Operated Toys or Other Electrically Operated Articles Intended for Use By Children.

• The test method for clacker balls at 16 CFR 1500.86(a)(5), Exemptions From Classification as a Banned Toy or Other Banned Article for use by Children.

Although section 14(a)(3)(B)(vi) of the CPSA directs the CPSC to publish a notice of requirements for accreditation of third party conformity assessment bodies to assess conformity with ‘‘ all other children’s product safety rules, ’’ this notice of requirements is limited to the test methods identified immediately
above.

The CPSC also recognizes that section 14(a)(3)(B)(vi) of the CPSA is captioned

as ‘‘All Other Children’s Product Safety Rules, ’’ but the body of the statutory requirement refers only to ‘‘ other children’s product safety rules. ’’ Nevertheless, section 14(a)(3)(B)(vi) of
the CPSA could be construed as requiring a notice of requirements for

‘‘ all ’’ other children’s product safety rules, rather than a notice of


### 22747 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 83 / Friday, April 30, 2010 / Notices

requirements for ‘‘ some ’’ or ‘‘ certain’’ children’s product safety rules. However, whether a particular rule represents a ‘‘ children’s product safety
rule ’’ may be subject to interpretation, and the Commission staff is continuing to evaluate which rules, regulations, standards, or bans are ‘‘ children’s product safety rules. ’’ The CPSC intends
to issue additional notices of requirements for other rules which the
Commission determines to be

‘‘ children’s product safety rules. ’’

This notice of requirements applies to all third party conformity assessment bodies as described in section 14(f)(2) of the CPSA. Generally speaking, such third party conformity assessment bodies are: (1) Third party conformity assessment bodies that are not owned, managed, or controlled by a manufacturer or private labeler of a children’s product to be tested by the third party conformity assessment body for certification purposes; (2)

‘‘ firewalled’’ conformity assessment bodies (those that are owned, managed, or controlled by a manufacturer or private labeler of a children’s product to be tested by the third party conformity assessment body for certification purposes and that seek accreditation under the additional statutory criteria
for ‘‘ firewalled’’ conformity assessment bodies); and (3) third party conformity assessment bodies owned or controlled, in whole or in part, by a government.

The Commission requires baseline accreditation of each category of third party conformity assessment body to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Standard 17025:2005, ‘‘ General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. ’’ The accreditation must be by an accreditation body that is a signatory to the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation-Mutual Recognition Arrangement (ILAC–MRA), and the scope of the accreditation must include testing for any of the test methods identified earlier in part I of this document for which the third party conformity assessment body seeks to be
accredited.

(A description of the history and content of the ILAC–MRA approach and of the requirements of the ISO/IEC 17025:2005 laboratory accreditation standard is provided in the CPSC staff briefing memorandum ‘‘Third Party Conformity Assessment Body Accreditation Requirements for Testing Compliance with 16 CFR Part 1501 (Small Parts Regulations), ’’ dated
November 2008 and available on the CPSC’s Web site at http://www.cpsc.gov/ library/foia/foia09/brief/smallparts.pdf. )

The Commission has established an electronic accreditation registration and listing system that can be accessed via

its Web site at http://www.cpsc.gov/ ABOUT/Cpsia/labaccred.html

.

The Commission notes that in the Federal Register of February 9, 2009 (74 FR 6396), the Commission announced a stay of enforcement of certain provisions of section 14(a) of the CPSA; the stay applied to the testing that

would result from this notice of requirements. On December 28, 2009, the Commission published a notice in

the Federal Register (74 FR 68588) revising the terms of the stay. One section of the December 28, 2009 notice

addressed ‘‘Consumer Products or

Children’s Products Where the Commission Is Continuing the Stay of Enforcement Until Further Notice, ’’ due to factors such as pending rulemaking proceedings affecting the product or the absence of a notice of requirements. The testing requirements contained in the regulations at 16 CFR Part 1505 and 16 CFR 1500.86(a)(5) were included in that section of the December 28, 2009 notice. As the factor preventing the stay from being lifted in the December 28, 2009 notice with regard to testing and certifications related to 16 CFR part 1505 and/or 16 CFR 1500.86(a)(5) was the absence of a notice of requirements, publication of this notice has the effect of lifting the stay with regard to these CPSC regulations.

This notice of requirements is effective on April 30, 2010. Further, as the publication of this notice of requirements effectively lifts the stay of enforcement with regard to testing and certifications related to 16 CFR part 1505 and/or 16 CFR 1500.86(a)(5), each manufacturer (including the importer) or private labeler of a product subject to 16 CFR part 1505 and/or 16 CFR 1500.86(a)(5), must have any such product manufactured after July 29, 2010 tested by a third party conformity assessment body accredited to do so and must issue a certificate of compliance with 16 CFR part 1505 and/or 16 CFR 1500.86(a)(5) based on that testing.

This notice of requirements is exempt

from the notice and comment rulemaking requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553 (see section 14(a)(3)(G) of the CPSA, as added by section 102(a)(2) of the CPSIA (15 U.S.C. 2063(a)(3)(G))). II. Accreditation Requirements

A. Baseline Third Party Conformity Assessment Body Accreditation Requirements

For a third party conformity assessment body to be accredited to test children’s products for conformity with
the test methods identified earlier in part I of this document, it must be accredited by an ILAC–MRA signatory accrediting body, and the accreditation must be registered with, and accepted by, the Commission. A listing of ILAC– MRA signatory accrediting bodies is
available on the Internet at http:// ilac.org/membersbycategory.html. The
accreditation must be to ISO Standard ISO/IEC 17025:2005, ‘‘ General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories, ’’ and the scope of the accreditation must expressly include testing to the test
method for clacker balls included in 16 CFR 1500.86(a)(5), Exemptions from classification as a banned toy or other banned article for use by children, and/ or the test methods for electrically operated toys or other electrically operated articles intended for use by children described in 16 CFR part 1505, Requirements for Electrically Operated Toys or Other Electrically Operated Articles Intended for Use By Children. A true copy, in English, of the accreditation and scope documents demonstrating compliance with these requirements must be registered with the Commission electronically. The additional requirements for
accreditation of firewalled and governmental conformity assessment bodies are described in parts II.B and
II.C of this document below.

The Commission will maintain on its web site an up-to-date listing of third party conformity assessment bodies whose accreditations it has accepted and the scope of each accreditation. Subject to the limited provisions for acceptance of ‘‘retrospective’’ testing noted in part IV below, once the Commission adds a third party conformity assessment body to that list, the third party conformity assessment body may commence testing of children’s products to support certification by the manufacturer or private labeler of compliance with the test methods identified earlier in part I
of this document.

B. Additional Accreditation Requirements for Firewalled Conformity
Assessment Bodies

In addition to the baseline accreditation requirements in part II.A of this document above, firewalled conformity assessment bodies seeking


### 22748 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 83 / Friday, April 30, 2010 / Notices

accredited status must submit to the Commission copies, in English, of their training documents showing how employees are trained to notify the Commission immediately and confidentially of any attempt by the manufacturer, private labeler, or other interested party to hide or exert undue influence over the third party conformity assessment body’s test results. This additional requirement applies to any third party conformity assessment body in which a manufacturer or private labeler of a children’s product to be tested by the third party conformity assessment body owns an interest of ten percent or more. While the Commission is not addressing common parentage of a third party conformity assessment body and a children’s product manufacturer at this time, it will be vigilant to see if this
issue needs to be addressed in the
future.

As required by section 14(f)(2)(D) of the CPSA, the Commission must formally accept, by order, the accreditation application of a third party conformity assessment body before the third party conformity assessment body
can become an accredited firewalled conformity assessment body.

C. Additional Accreditation Requirements for Governmental Conformity Assessment Bodies

In addition to the baseline accreditation requirements of part II.A of this document above, the CPSIA permits accreditation of a third party conformity assessment body owned or controlled, in whole or in part, by a government if:

• To the extent practicable, manufacturers or private labelers located in any nation are permitted to choose conformity assessment bodies that are not owned or controlled by the government of that nation;

• The third party conformity assessment body’s testing results are not subject to undue influence by any other person, including another governmental entity;

• The third party conformity assessment body is not accorded more
favorable treatment than other third party conformity assessment bodies in
the same nation who have been accredited;

• The third party conformity assessment body’s testing results are accorded no greater weight by other governmental authorities than those of other accredited third party conformity assessment bodies; and

• The third party conformity assessment body does not exercise
undue influence over other governmental authorities on matters affecting its operations or on decisions by other governmental authorities controlling distribution of products based on outcomes of the third party conformity assessment body’s conformity assessments.

The Commission will accept the accreditation of a governmental third party conformity assessment body if it
meets the baseline accreditation requirements of part II.A of this
document above and meets the
additional conditions stated here. To obtain this assurance, CPSC staff will engage the governmental entities relevant to the accreditation request.

III. How Does a Third Party Conformity Assessment Body Apply for Acceptance
of Its Accreditation?

The Commission has established an electronic accreditation acceptance and registration system accessed via the

Commission’s Internet site at http:// www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/
labaccred.html. The applicant provides, in English, basic identifying information concerning its location, the type of accreditation it is seeking, and electronic copies of its ILAC–MRA accreditation certificate and scope statement, and firewalled third party conformity assessment body training document(s), if relevant.

Commission staff will review the submission for accuracy and completeness. In the case of baseline third party conformity assessment bodies and government-owned or government-operated conformity assessment bodies, when that review and any necessary discussions with the applicant are satisfactorily completed, the third party conformity assessment body in question is added to the CPSC’s list of accredited third party conformity
assessment bodies at http:// www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/
labaccred.html. In the case of a firewalled conformity assessment body seeking accredited status, when the staff’s review is complete, the staff
transmits its recommendation on
accreditation to the Commission for consideration. (A third party conformity assessment body that may ultimately seek acceptance as a firewalled third party conformity assessment body also can initially request acceptance as a third party conformity assessment body accredited for testing of children’s products other than those of its owners.) If the Commission accepts a staff
recommendation to accredit a firewalled conformity assessment body, the firewalled conformity assessment body
will then be added to the CPSC’s list of accredited third party conformity assessment bodies. In each case, the Commission will notify the third party conformity assessment body electronically of acceptance of its
accreditation. All information to support an accreditation acceptance request must be provided in the English language.

Subject to the limited provisions for acceptance of ‘‘retrospective’’ testing noted in part IV of this document below, once the Commission adds a third party conformity assessment body to the list, the third party conformity assessment body may then begin testing of children’s products to support certification of compliance with the regulations identified earlier in part I of
this document for which it has been
accredited.

IV. Limited Acceptance of Children’s
Product Certifications Based on Third Party Conformity Assessment Body Testing Prior to the Commission’s Acceptance of Accreditation

The Commission will accept a certificate of compliance with the
standards for clacker balls included in 16 CFR 1500.86(a)(5), Exemptions from classification as a banned toy or other banned article for use by children, and/ or the standards for electrically operated toys or other electrically operated articles intended for use by children described in 16 CFR part 1505, Requirements for Electrically Operated Toys or Other Electrically Operated Articles Intended for Use By Children, based on testing performed by an accredited third party conformity assessment body (including a government-owned or -controlled conformity assessment body, and a firewalled conformity assessment body) prior to the Commission’s acceptance of
its accreditation if:

• At the time of product testing, the product was tested by a third party conformity assessment body that was ISO/IEC 17025 accredited by an ILAC–
MRA member at the time of the test. For firewalled conformity assessment bodies, the firewalled conformity assessment body must be one that the Commission accredited by order at or before the time the product was tested, even though the order will not have included the test methods specified in this notice. If the third party conformity assessment body has not been accredited by a Commission order as a firewalled conformity assessment body, the Commission will not accept a certificate of compliance based on testing performed by the third party conformity assessment body before it is accredited, by Commission order, as a firewalled conformity assessment body.


### 22749 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 83 / Friday, April 30, 2010 / Notices

• The third party conformity assessment body’s application for testing using the test methods identified in this notice is accepted by the CPSC on or before June 29, 2010;

• The product was tested on or after April 30, 2010 with respect to the regulations identified in this notice.

• The accreditation scope in effect for the third party conformity assessment body at the time of testing expressly included testing to the regulations identified earlier in part I of this document;

• The test results show compliance with the applicable current standards and regulations; and

• The third party conformity assessment body’s accreditation, including inclusion in its scope the standards described in part I of this notice, remains in effect through the effective date for mandatory third party testing and manufacturer/private labeler certification for conformity with 16 CFR part 1505 and/or 16 CFR 1500.86(a)(5).

Dated: April 21, 2010.

Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary, Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010–9842 Filed 4–29–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6355–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**

**Office of the Secretary**

**[Docket No. DOD–2009–OS–0165]**

**Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request** 

**ACTION :**  Notice.

The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

**DATES :**  Consideration will be given to all comments received by June 1, 2010.

Title and OMB Number: Police Record Check; DD Form 369, OMB Number

0704–0007.

Type of Request: Extension. Number of Respondents: 175,000. Responses per Respondent: 1. Annual Responses: 175,000. Average Burden per Response: 27
minutes.

Annual Burden Hours: 78,750 hours.
Needs and Uses: This information collection requirement is necessary to
obtain information about arrests and criminal records on applicants to the
Armed Forces of the United States. The DD Form 369, Police Records Check, is used to identify any disqualifying history regarding arrests or convictions.

Affected Public: State, local, or tribal government.

Frequency: On occasion. Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.

OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet
Seehra.

Written comments and recommendations on the proposed
information collection should be sent to Ms. Seehra at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and title, by the following method:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket
number and title for this Federal Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact
information.

DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.

Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/ Information Management Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 22209–2133.

Dated: April 27, 2010. Mitchell S. Bryman, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010–10133 Filed 4–29–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 5001–06–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**

**Office of the Secretary**

**[Docket No. DoD–2009–OS–0190]**

**Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request** 

**ACTION :**  Notice.

The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

**DATES :**  Consideration will be given to all comments received by June 1, 2010. Title and OMB Number: Application for a Review by the Physical Disability Board of Review of the Rating for a Medical Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States; DD Form 294; OMB Number 0704–0453.

Type of Request: Extension. Number of Respondents: 1,800. Responses per Respondent: 1. Annual Responses: 1,800. Average Burden per Response: 45
minutes.

Annual Burden Hours: 1,350 hours.

Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary to
have former members who were separated from the armed forces from between September 11, 2001 and December 31, 2009 due to unfitness for duty due to a medical condition with a disability rating of 20 percent disabled or less; and were found to be not eligible for retirement request a review of that
determinations in accordance with the provisions of 10 United States Code

Section 1554a.

Affected Public: Individuals or
households.

Frequency: On occasion. Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.

OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet
Seehra.

Written comments and recommendations on the proposed
information collection should be sent to Ms. Seehra at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and title, by the following method:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket
number and title for this Federal Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact
information.

DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.

Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/ Information Management Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 22209–2133.