alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 62 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 62

                 To correct the enrollment of H.R. 660.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 19 (legislative day, December 18), 2007

    Mr. Leahy (for himself, Mr. Specter, and Mr. Kyl) submitted the 
  following concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
                 To correct the enrollment of H.R. 660.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in the enrollment of H.R. 660, an Act to amend title 18, United 
States Code, to protect judges, prosecutors, witnesses, victims, and 
their family members, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall strike section 502 of the Act and insert the 
following:

``SEC. 502. MAGISTRATE JUDGES LIFE INSURANCE.

    ``(a) In General.--Section 604(a)(5) of title 28, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting after `hold office during good behavior', 
the following: `magistrate judges appointed under section 631 of this 
title,'.
    ``(b) Construction.--For purposes of construing and applying 
chapter 87 of title 5, United States Code, including any adjustment of 
insurance rates by regulation or otherwise, the following categories of 
judicial officers shall be deemed to be judges of the United States as 
described under section 8701 of title 5, United States Code:
            ``(1) Magistrate judges appointed under section 631 of 
        title 28, United States Code.
            ``(2) Magistrate judges retired under section 377 of title 
        28, United States Code.
    ``(c) Effective Date.--Subsection (b) and the amendment made by 
subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any payment made on or after 
the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after 
the date of enactment of this Act.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### §§ 2205.131-2205.134 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 99 (Monday, May 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 32150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12705]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Former Prisoners of War, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 that a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Former Prisoners 
of War will be held on June 5 through June 7, 2000, at the Department 
of Veterans Affairs, Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Room 230, 
Washington, DC 20420. Each day the meeting will convene at 9 a.m. and 
end at 4:30 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs on the administration of benefits under Title 38, United States 
Code, for veterans who are former prisoners of war, and to make 
recommendations on the needs of such veterans for compensation, health 
care and rehabilitation.
    On June 5, the meeting will begin with an introduction of committee 
members and dignitaries, a review of Committee reports, an update of 
activities since the last meeting, and a period for POW veterans and/or 
the public to address the committee. The Committee will also review the 
Secretary's response to the April 1999 report of meeting, and receive 
presentations on the Veterans Benefits Administration and Veterans 
Health Administration activities. On June 6, the meeting will include 
an update on the Center for POW Studies, a report from the National 
Institute of Health on its Mortality/Morbidity Study and a briefing 
from the Special Panel on Stroke. On June 7, the Committee's Medical 
and Administrative subcommittees will break out to discuss their 
activities and report back to the Committee.
    Additionally, the Committee will review and analyze the comments 
discussed throughout the meeting for the purpose of assisting and 
compiling a final report to be sent to the Secretary.
    Members of the public may direct questions or submit prepared 
statements for review by the Committee in advance of the meeting, in 
writing only, to Mr. Robert J. Epley, Director, Compensation and 
Pension Service (21), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420. Submitted materials must be received 
by May 31, 2000. A report of the meeting and roster of Committee 
members may be obtained from Mr. Epley.

    Dated: May 11, 2000.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Marvin R. Eason,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-12705 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of The Boyds Collection, Ltd. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Jan L. Murley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)     The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

2)     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The BoydsCollection, Ltd. and will be retained by The Boyds Collection, Ltd. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
| /s/ Jan L. Murley       |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| Jan L. Murley           |   |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
| June 8, 2006       |   |   |

 

----
#### In the Matter of the Will of Myron H. Bennett, Deceased. Charles C. Congdon, as Executor of Mary A. Ward, Deceased, Appellant; Jennie B. Brasser, as Administratrix with the Will Annexed of Myron H. Bennett, Deceased, Respondent.

Argued September 30, 1937;

decided October 19, 1937.

*594
      *Charles C. Congdon,*in person, for appellant.

*Charles T. Ennis*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs to parties appearing by separate attorneys and filing briefs payable out of the estate. No opinion.

■ Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
#### § 1915.1020 Access to employee exposure and medical records.

Note:

The requirements applicable to shipyard employment under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1020 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-1910.1020).

[[61 FR 31431](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31431), June 20, 1996]
#### Carino Italian Style, S.R.L., et al., Appellants, v Steven Shammah et al., Respondents.

[697 NYS2d 609]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered October 2, 1998, denying the motion to vacate the court’s memorandum decision/order dated April 15, 1998, which had dismissed the complaint for neglect to prosecute, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, with costs against each defendant, the motion granted, and the complaint reinstated.

There is no allegation by defendants-respondents, nor any finding by the trial court, that a written ninety day demand to file and serve a note of issue was served on plaintiffs-appellants as required by CPLR 3216 (b). In *Baczkowski v Collins Constr.*
      *2
      *Co.*(89 NY2d 499, 502-503), the Court of Appeals underscored the limits upon a court’s ability to dismiss an action for failure to prosecute: “CPLR 3216 is the general statutory authority for neglect-to-prosecute dismissals. The provision has a checkered history, which this Court has recounted on prior occasions *(see, e.g., Chase v Scavuzzo,*87 NY2d 228, 231-233; *Cohn v Borchard Affiliations,*25 NY2d 237, 244-246; *see also,*Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3216:l-C3216:4, at 628-635). As a result of a 1967 amendment to CPLR 3216, courts are prohibited from dismissing an action for neglect to prosecute unless the statutory preconditions to dismissal are met *(see,*CPLR 3216 [b]; *Cohn v Borchard Affiliations, supra, 25*NY2d, at 246).” *(See also, Matter of Holtzman v Goldman,*71 NY2d 564, 573; *Wisniewski v Wisniewski,*149 AD2d 965; *Banca Di Roma v Tripodi Eyewear Intl.,*219 AD2d 536; *Ameropan Realty Corp. v Rangeley Lakes Corp., 222*AD2d 631.)

This Court substitutes its own discretion in place of the Supreme Court’s to reinstate the complaint of the plaintiffs-appellants. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Wallach, Lerner, Rubin and Buckley, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheets for Elgrande.Com, Inc. (unaudited) at November 30,
2000 and the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(unaudited) for the period ended November 30, 2000, and is qualified in its
entirety by  reference to such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-2000
<CASH>                                         13,240
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                         195,522
<DEPRECIATION>                                (255,676)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 637,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         729,892
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       14,427
<OTHER-SE>                                   (914,724)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  637,581
<SALES>                                        78,751
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                         142,147
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (63,376)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            1,361,104
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (1,426,298)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (1,426,298)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                              (1,426,298)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)








</TABLE>
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 58 

Welcoming First Minister Dr. Ian Paisley and Deputy First Minister Martin 

McGuinness of Northern Ireland to the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 4, 2007 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. DODD, Mr. REED, Mr. KERRY, 

Mr. BIDEN, Mr. SCHUMER, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. DURBIN, 

Mr. OBAMA, Mr. SMITH, Mr. MCCAIN, and Mr. LEAHY) submitted the 

following concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Welcoming First Minister Dr. Ian Paisley and Deputy First 

Minister Martin McGuinness of Northern Ireland to the 

United States. 

Whereas, on May 8, 2007, power was restored to the Assembly of Northern Ireland, opening a new chapter in the 

history of Northern Ireland; 

Whereas Dr. Ian Paisley became First Minister and Martin 

McGuinness became Deputy First Minister of Northern 

Ireland; 

Whereas Dr. Paisley and Mr. McGuinness have been working 

to solidify the peace agreement and to govern Northern 

Ireland effectively; and 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•SCON 58 ATS 

Whereas Dr. Paisley and Mr. McGuinness are making their 

first trip together to the United States: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) welcomes First Minister Dr. Ian Paisley 

4 and Deputy First Minister Martin McGuinness of 

5 Northern Ireland to the United States; 

6 (2) commends Dr. Paisley and Mr. McGuinness 

7 for showing the world that it is possible to rise above 

8 decades of bitter sectarian violence to achieve peace; 

9 and 

10 (3) expresses hope that Northern Ireland will 

11 continue to be peaceful and stable in the future. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 14-829.1

________________________________________________________________________

TAXATION

Information Exchange

Agreement Between

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

and MAURITIUS

Signed at Port Louis December 27, 2013
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent

evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof

or authentication thereof.”
 MAURITIUS

 Taxation: Information Exchange

 Agreement signed at Port Louis December 27, 2013;

 Entered into force August 29, 2014.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Vocational Rehabilitation /
              - 12.9 Vocational Rehabilitation—Change in the Rehabilitation Rate

## Table 12.9: Vocational Rehabilitation—Change in the Rehabilitation Rate: 2010 to 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gilbert Smalls, Appellant.

[699 NYS2d 114]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Fisher, J.), rendered July 30, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly admitted limited expert testimony concerning the general practices of drug dealers. The testimony was admitted to explain to the jury why the defendant, who was observed to have been working with another individual who was not apprehended, did not have the “buy money” or controlled substance on his person when he was arrested shortly after he sold crack cocaine to an undercover police officer *(see, People v Graves,*85 NY2d 1024; *People v Lacey,*245 AD2d 145; *People v Santiago,*222 AD2d 461; *People v Brown,*218 AD2d 813; *People v Garcia,*196 AD2d 433, *affd*83 NY2d 817; *People v Tucker,*102 AD2d 535, 537; *cf., People v Bethea,*261 AD2d 629).

The defendant’s sentence is not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or do not require reversal. Thompson, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
#### MARTIEN ELEC CO v HARRIMAN NAT BK

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No. 9991.

Decided December 23, 1929

Messrs. Turney & SJpe, Cleveland, for Elec Co.

Messrs. Ulmer & Berne, Cleveland, for Nat Bk.

LEMERT, P. J. & SHERICK, J. (5th Dist) sitting.

LEMERT, PJ.

We find from an examination of the record in this case, which is extremely lengthy and voluminous, that the plaintiff herein has failed to, have attached to the bill of exceptions some fifteen exhibits that were introduced as evidence in the. various courts wherein some angle of this case was presented.. An examination of the character of- these exhibits reveals the fact that they consisted of pleadings, journal entries, appearance dockets and opinions, which were parts of the record in other cases in the Common Pleas, Court of Appeals and Supreme .Court. The plaintiff herein had the right to substitute copies *47for the original exhibits, but it has failed to do so.

We note that when the trial court in the instant case signed the bill of exceptions herein that he inserted the following language, as appears from page 76; “quite a number of exhibits are not attached and this bill is signed with the understanding that they are all to be attached before filing.'in Court of Appeals. Otherwise the court does not certify that this is a complete bill.”

The exhibits that seem to be missing from the record are defendant’s exhibits A, E, F, I, K, L, M, O, P, Q, W, V, W-l and Z, some of which especially bear upon the question of res adjudicata.

Keeping in mind that some of these exhibits show the nature and character of the pleadings in the courts below, and journal entries which might or might not be binding upon. this, a reviewing court, and having this incomplete record before us, this court cannot and will not hear and determine this case with the record in that condition. It is quite evident that the trial court when it made the entry as hereinbefore stated, had in mind that if error was prosecuted in this case that there should be a full and complete record, and the court below signed the bill of exceptions with the understanding that all these exhibits be attached before filing in the Court of Appeal's, and if that was not done, the court below desired it to -be fully understood that the record that he was signing, was not a complete bill, so that y/e find that the record before us, is not complete as required by statute and we, -therefore,. find and hold that the petition in error herein should be and the same is hereby dismissed. Exceptions may be noted.

Sherick, J., concurs. Houck, J., not participating.
Served: March 21, 2013 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Issued by the Department of Transportation 

on the 21st day of March, 2013 

Essential Air Service at 

DIOMEDE, ALASKA DOCKET DOT -OST -2009-0260 

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq. 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION FOR PROPOSALS AT DIOMEDE, ALASKA 

By Order 2013-3-20, February 21, 2013, the Department requested proposals for air service at 

Diomede, Alaska, under§ 41736, Air Transportation to Non-eligible Places (ATNEP), with proposals 

due March 21, 2013. On March 20, Pathfinder Aviation, Inc., requested a two-week extension to that 

deadline. 

We will grant the extension request. Proposals at Diomede are now due on April4, 2013. 

Dennis DeVany, Chief, 

EAS and Domestic Analysis 

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web 

http://www .regulations. gov
§ 4007.2 Definitions. ( a ) The following terms are defined in § 4001.2 of this chapter: Code, contributing sponsor, ERISA, IRS, notice of intent to terminate, PBGC, plan, plan administrator, plan year, single-employer plan, and termination date.
( b ) For purposes of this part, the following terms are defined in § 4006.2 of this chapter: continuation plan, new plan, newly covered plan, participant, participant count, premium funding target, premium payment year short plan year, small plan, and UVB valuation date.
[61 FR 34020, July 1, 1996, as amended at 73 FR 15076, Mar. 21, 2008; 79 FR 13561, Mar. 11, 2014]