alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Liberty Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Hayne Hipp          |  | /s/ Howard L. Schrott  
|                        |  |                        
|Hayne Hipp              |  | Howard L. Schrott      
|Chief Executive Officer |  | Chief Financial Officer
|March 4, 2004           |  | March 4, 2004          

43
# EUR-Lex - 32000R0923 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R0923

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 923/2000 of 3 May 2000 fixing the storage aid for unprocessed dried grapes and unprocessed dried figs from the 1999/2000 marketing year **

*
Official Journal L 107 , 04/05/2000 P. 0010 - 0010 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 923/2000

of 3 May 2000

fixing the storage aid for unprocessed dried grapes and unprocessed dried figs from the 1999/2000 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in processed fruit and vegetable products(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2701/1999(2), and in particular Article 9(8) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 9(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 provides for aid to be granted to storage agencies for the quantities of sultanas, currants and dried figs that they buy in and for the actual duration of storage.

(2) Article 2 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 504/97 of 19 March 1997 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 as regards the system of production aid for products processed from fruit and vegetables(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1607/1999(4), lays down the dates of the marketing years.

(3) The storage aid for unprocessed dried grapes and unprocessed dried figs from the 1999/2000 marketing year should be fixed and, to that end, account should be taken of Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1622/1999 of 23 July 1999 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 as regards the scheme for the storage of unprocessed dried grapes and unprocessed dried figs(5) and of the fact that the storage aid is to be calculated on the basis of the technical cost of storage and of financing the buying-in price paid for the products.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Processed Fruit and Vegetables,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For products from the 1999/2000 marketing year, the storage aid provided for in Article 9(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 shall be:

(a) EUR 0,1767 per day and per tonne net weight until 28 February 2001 and EUR 0,1507 per day and per tonne net weight from 1 March 2001 for dried grapes;

(b) EUR 0,1728 per day and per tonne net weight for dried figs.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 May 2000.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 29.

(2) OJ L 327, 21.12.1999, p. 5.

(3) OJ L 78, 20.3.1997, p. 14.

(4) OJ L 190, 23.7.1999, p. 11.

(5) OJ L 192, 24.7.1999, p. 33.
Submitted on petition for rehearing July 17,

rehearing denied September 25, 1928.

#### L. D. GORDON et al. *v.*F. L. ADAMS et al.

(270 Pac. 474.)

Rehearing denied September 25, 1928.

For appellants, *Mr. T. T. Bennett*and *Mr. B. Swant on.*

For respondents, *Mr. A. K. Pech*and *Mr. J ames T. Brand.*

On Petition eor Rehearing.

(270 Pac. 474.)

BEAN, J.

A petition for rehearing directs attention to a misdescription of the real property of defendant Clara A. Busse.

*587The first sentence of the second paragraph of the memorandum of the opinion will be changed so as to read as follows:

Defendant Clara A. Busse pleaded, in effect, as an equitable defense to the complaint of plaintiffs, that Clara A. Busse and Henry Busse are the owners of an undivided one-half interest each in fee simple of the property described in the complaint and that she and Henry Busse have been such owners since April, 1916.

The last part of the opinion will be changed so as to read as follows: The interest of Henry Busse in the property is not involved herein. The decree of the Circuit Court is reversed and the deed from Coos County to L. D. Cordon and W. S. Wills of October 27, 1923, should be canceled and set aside as to the one-half interest of Clara A. Busse in said real estate, and decree to be void as to said one-half interest.

Defendant Clara A. Busse’s title to an undivided one-half interest in and to the east twenty-five feet of lot 5, block 17 of the Town of Marshfield, Coos County, Oregon, according to the Hall plat, on file in the office of the county clerk of said county, should be quieted upon payment of all taxes, interest, penalties, cost and charges, on account of taxes on said one-half interest due to Coos County and R. H. Coshun from defendant Clara A. Busse, within sixty days after the entry of the mandate herein in the Circuit Court, as prayed for in defendant’s answer. In the event that defendant fails to make such payment her answer should be dismissed. In other respects we adhere to the former opinion.

Rehearing Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 13 (Thursday, January 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1270]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to The Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 
Secs. 9601 to 9675

    Under 42 U.S.C. 9622, notice is hereby given that on December 22, 
1999, a proposed consent decree in United States v. Robert W. Meyer, 
Jr., Civil Action No. 1:97-CV-526, was lodged with the United States 
District Court for the Western District of Michigan.
    In this action the United States sought to recover past costs 
incurred in connection with the clean-up of the contiguous Northernaire 
Plating Company and Kysor Industrial Corporation Superfund Sites 
located in Cadillac, Wexford County, Michigan. The proposed consent 
decree resolves the United States' claims against defendant Robert W. 
Meyer, Jr., as the operator of a facility that contributed to the harm 
associated with the Northernaire Site, in return for a total payment of 
$625,000.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Robert W. Meyer, Jr., D.J. Ref. #90-11-2-837B.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney, 330 Ionia NW, Room 501, Grand Rapids, Michigan 
49503, and at U.S. EPA Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604. A copy of the proposed consent decree may also be 
obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, 
Washington, D.C. 20044-7611. In requesting a copy, please refer to the 
referenced case and enclose a check in the amount of $5.50 (25 cents 
per page reproduction costs), payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Bruce Gelber,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 00-1270 Filed 1-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4580 

To reauthorize the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to authorize funding to conduct 

a national training program for State and local prosecutors’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2020 

Mrs. LOEFFLER (for herself and Mr. COTTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to authorize funding 

to conduct a national training program for State and 

local prosecutors’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Training our Prosecu5 tors Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NATIONAL TRAINING PROGRAM FOR STATE AND 

7 LOCAL PROSECUTORS. 

8 The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to authorize funding to con9 duct a national training program for State and local prosVerDate Sep 11 2014 19:31 Sep 22, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4580.IS S4580

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4580 IS

1 ecutors’’, approved October 15, 2008 (34 U.S.C. 10121 

2 note), is amended— 

3 (1) in section 1, by inserting ‘‘that regularly 

4 provides training and technical assistance to State 

5 and local prosecutors nationwide’’ after ‘‘national 

6 nonprofit’’; 

7 (2) in section 2, by inserting ‘‘preventing and 

8 prosecuting violent crimes and crimes involving 

9 property destruction,’’ after ‘‘staff training,’’; and 

10 (3) in section 3— 

11 (A) by striking ‘‘$4,750,000’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘$5,000,000’’; and 

13 (B) by striking ‘‘2009 through 2012’’ and 

14 inserting ‘‘2021 through 2024’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6494

GEORGE HAIGLER, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES M. CONDON,

Attorney General,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-97-3070-0-17BD)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 29, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Haigler, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

George Haigler, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Haigler v. South Carolina, No. CA-97-

3070-0-17BD (D.S.C. Feb. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Motor vehicle use map. BoiseNational Forest. Cascade Ranger District, Idaho**
 
2013
East | West
2014
East | West
2017
East | West
2018
East | West
 
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28:B 63/16/
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber:000934062
 
February 28, 2018
Exhibit 10.21.2 01.31.2015 10K




Exhibit 10.21.2


AMENDMENT TO 
MACY’S, INC. 401(k) RETIREMENT INVESTMENT PLAN
The Macy’s, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Investment Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended, both effective as of January 1, 2014 for the Plan as restated effective as of such date and effective as of June 26, 2013 for the version of the Plan in effect between June 26, 2013 and December 31, 2013 and in order to reflect new federal rules as to the recognition of same-sex spouses under the Plan, by amending Section 11.12  of the Plan in its entirety to read as follows.
11.12    Marriage Status.  For all purposes of the Plan, a person shall be deemed to be a Participant’s spouse at any time only if he or she is at such time the legally recognized spouse of the Participant under the laws of the state in which the Participant then resides and if he or she is not barred from being considered the Participant’s spouse for purposes of the Federal tax laws by any Federal law.  Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of the Plan, effective as of June 26, 2013 and for all purposes of the Plan, if a Participant and another person of the same sex as that of the Participant validly enter into a marriage in any state whose laws authorize the marriage of two individuals of the same sex, such other person shall be deemed to be the Participant’s spouse, even if the Participant and such other person are domiciled in a state that does not recognize the validity of same-sex marriages.  In accordance with the foregoing, a Participant shall for all purposes of the Plan be deemed to be married at any time if a person is then considered his or her spouse under the preceding two sentences of this Section 11.12.    
IN ORDER TO EFFECT THE FOREGOING PLAN REVISIONS, the sponsor of the Plan hereby signs this Plan amendment, effective for all purposes as of June 26, 2013.
MACY’S, INC.


By: William Tompkins
Title: SVP, HR and Total Rewards 
Date: July 8, 2014
EXHIBIT 12

<TABLE>

                 KERR-McGEE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
              COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES(1)

<CAPTION>


(Millions of dollars)                                     1999         1998         1997         1996          1995
                                                          ----         ----         ----         ----          ----
<S>                                                       <C>         <C>           <C>          <C>
Income (loss) from
     continuing operations                                $146        $(345)        $351         $358          $110

Add -
     Provision (benefit) for
         income taxes                                      111         (175)         184          225           (42)
     Interest expense                                      190          157          141          145           193
     Rental expense representative of interest factor       14           12           13           10            18
                                                          ----        -----         ----         ----          ----
              Earnings                                    $461        $(351)        $689         $738          $279
                                                          ====        =====         ====         ====          ====

Fixed Charges -
     Interest expense                                     $190         $157         $141         $145          $193
     Rental expense representative of interest factor       14           12           13           10            18
     Interest capitalized                                    9           28           24           25            21
                                                          ----        -----         ----         ----          ----
              Total fixed charges                         $213        $ 197         $178         $180          $232
                                                          ====        =====         ====         ====          ====

Ratio of earnings to fixed
         charges                                           2.2            - (1)      3.9          4.1           1.2
                                                          ====        =====         ====         ====          ====

</TABLE>

(1)Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $548 million in 1998.
EXHIBIT 23**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-22591)pertaining to The Liberty Corporation Retirement and Savings Plan, in the Registration Statement(Form S-8 No. 333-30151) pertaining to The Performance Incentive Compensation Program, and in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-84938) pertaining to The Liberty Corporation Retirementand Savings Plan, as Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2002 of our report dated February 3,2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of the Liberty Corporationincluded in the annual report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003./s/ Ernst & Young LLPGreenville, South Carolina
#### THE MASSMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. 45765]

[102 C. Cls. 699; 325 U. S. 866]

Government contract; error ip. preparation of bid discovered and disclosed before signing of contract; neither -unilateral nor mutual mistake to justify reformation of •.contract.

Plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the .'Supreme Court May 28, 1945.
§ 36.425 Counseling and use of appraisal and counseling materials. ( a ) *Counseling.* A recipient shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of sex in the counseling or guidance of students or applicants for admission.
( b ) *Use of appraisal and counseling materials.* A recipient that uses testing or other materials for appraising or counseling students shall not use different materials for students on the basis of their sex or use materials that permit or require different treatment of students on such basis unless such different materials cover the same occupations and interest areas and the use of such different materials is shown to be essential to eliminate sex bias. Recipients shall develop and use internal procedures for ensuring that such materials do not discriminate on the basis of sex. Where the use of a counseling test or other instrument results in a substantially disproportionate number of members of one sex in any particular course of study or classification, the recipient shall take such action as is necessary to assure itself that such disproportion is not the result of discrimination in the instrument or its application.
( c ) *Disproportion in classes.* Where a recipient finds that a particular class contains a substantially disproportionate number of individuals of one sex, the recipient shall take such action as is necessary to assure itself that such disproportion is not the result of discrimination on the basis of sex in counseling or appraisal materials or by counselors.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT (23)

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Lindal Cedar Homes, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 
33-64186 and 333-28509) on Form S-8 of Lindal Cedar Homes, Inc. of our report 
dated February 23, 1999 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Lindal 
Cedar Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the 
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash 
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998 
and related schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 1998, annual 
report on Form 10-K of Lindal Cedar Homes, Inc.



Seattle, Washington
March 29, 1999
§ 35.2 To what programs or activities do these regulations apply? ( a ) *Application.* This part applies to any program or activity that receives Federal financial assistance, directly or indirectly, from DOL.
( b ) *Limitation of application.* This part does not apply to: ( 1 ) An age distinction contained in that part of a Federal, State, or local statute or ordinance adopted by an elected, general purpose legislative body that: ( i ) Provides persons with any benefits or assistance based on age; or
( ii ) Establishes criteria for participation in age-related terms; or
( iii ) Describes intended beneficiaries or target groups in age-related terms.
( 2 ) Any employment practice of any employer, employment agency, labor organization, or any labor-management joint apprentice training program.
#### § 37.69 What happens if a recipient fails to show cause?

If the recipient fails to show cause why enforcement proceedings should not be initiated, the Director must follow the enforcement procedures outlined in §§ 37.99 and 37.100.

Complaint Processing Procedures
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

36) ll-K- (B) -24 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:49 AM Sheet 36 of 325 
P.2 

ft=8 

II-K-(B)-24 

REGULATORY SCENARIOS FOR THE FOURTH ROUND OF IFCAM 

RUNS. 

Letter from E. Medine, EEA to A. Wehe, EPArSASD. 

January 30, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-24
#### Lemuel Adams *versus*Sarah Adams.

Where a libel for a divorce charged, generally, that the respondent had committed various acts of adultery, at divers times, with persons unknown, during a period of eight years, the Court ordered the libeliant to hie a bill of particulars.

*Per Curiam.*

The libel for a divorce in this case, charged various acts of adultery, committed at divers times with persons unknown, for a period of eight years. The respondent moved, that the libel be quashed for uncertainty, or that the libellant be required to file a bill of particulars, at a reasonable time before trial, and be confined, on the hearing, to the cases thus specified. Whereupon the Court ordered, that a bill of particulars should be so filed.

Cushing, for the libellant.

*J.*Holmes, of Maine, and Clark, for the respondent
Record of Di s cussion Docket No. FAA- Directorat e Identifier: -AD With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i . e., Desi gn Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPI CS DISC USSED 

### Boeing Respo nse to Jun e 29 , 2012 Co ncur. 

### compliance recommendation A4A Robert Ireland J anuary 4, 2014 No response.

Other/ Additional Inf ormation: