alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 888 Referred in House (RFH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 888

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2007

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend section 1091 of title 18, United States Code, to allow the 
         prosecution of genocide in appropriate circumstances.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Genocide Accountability Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. GENOCIDE.

    Section 1091 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking subsection (d) and inserting the following:
    ``(d) Required Circumstance for Offenses.--The circumstance 
referred to in subsections (a) and (c) is that--
            ``(1) the offense is committed in whole or in part within 
        the United States;
            ``(2) the alleged offender is a national of the United 
        States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the 
        Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101));
            ``(3) the alleged offender is an alien lawfully admitted 
        for permanent residence in the United States (as that term is 
        defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
        (8 U.S.C. 1101));
            ``(4) the alleged offender is a stateless person whose 
        habitual residence is in the United States; or
            ``(5) after the conduct required for the offense occurs, 
        the alleged offender is brought into, or found

              

 in, the United States, even if that conduct occurred outside the 
United States.''.

            Passed the Senate March 29, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of North American Galvanizing & Coatings,
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the
undersigned hereby certifies in his or her capacity as an officer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his or her knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material
      respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
      Company.












NORTH AMERICAN GALVANIZING
& COATINGS, INC. (Registrant)













/s/ Ronald J. Evans
              Ronald
      J. Evans
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer
              
              
              /s/ Beth B. Pulley
              Beth
      B. Pulley
              Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer







February
24, 2010
#### § 2205.111 Notice.

The agency shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the agency, and make such information available to them in such manner as the Chairman finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 or the access to technology provided under section 508 and this regulation.
§ 1960.72 Reporting Federal Agency Injury and Illness Information. ( a ) Each agency must submit to the Secretary by May 1 of each year all information included on the agency's previous calendar year's occupational injury and illness recordkeeping forms. The information submitted must include all data entered on the OSHA Form 300, Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses (or equivalent); OSHA Form 301, Injury and Illness Incident Report (or equivalent); and OSHA Form 300A, Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses (or equivalent).
( b ) The Secretary must provide each agency by January 15 of each year with the format and guidelines for electronically submitting the agency's occupational injury and illness recordkeeping information.
( c ) Each agency must submit to the Secretary by May 1, 2014, a list of all establishments. The list must include information about the department/agency affiliation, NAICS code, a street address, city, state and zip code. Federal agencies are also responsible for updating their list of establishments by May 1 of each year when they submit the annual report to the Secretary required by § 1960.71(a)(1).
[78 FR 47190, Aug. 5, 2013]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of UC
Hub Group, Inc. for the quarter ending October 31, 2006, I, Larry Wilcox, Chief
Executive Officer of UC Hub Group, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.     Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending October
31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.     The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ending October 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of UC Hub Group,
Inc.

     Dated: January 12, 2007

                                   /s/  Larry Wilcox
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Larry Wilcox, Chief Executive Officer of
                                   UC Hub Group, Inc.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-277-000]

Take notice that on May 10, 2000, Canyon Creek Compression Company (Canyon) tendered for filing to be a part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No.1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to the filing, to be effective June 1, 2000.

Canyon states that these tariff sheets are being filed in compliance with the Commission's Order No. 587-G issued April 16, 1998 in Docket No. RM96-1-008, which order relates to interstate pipelines' business transactions using Internet communication as well as to various issues relating to the standardization of these business communications using the Internet.

Canyon requested any waivers which may be required for the tendered tariff sheets to become effective June 1, 2000, consistent with Order Nos. 587-G and 587-I.

Canyon states that copies of the filing have been mailed to its customers, interested state commissions and all parties set out the Commission's official service list in Docket No. RM96-1.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for pubic inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-12718 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 8 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                  S. 8

To restore and enhance the capabilities of the Armed Forces, to enhance 
the readiness of the Armed Forces, to support the men and women of the 
                 Armed Forces, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

  Mr. Reid (for himself, Mr. Levin, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Lautenberg, Ms. 
    Cantwell, Mr. Leahy, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Webb, Mr. Menendez, Ms. 
Landrieu, and Mrs. Boxer) introduced the following bill; which was read 
         twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To restore and enhance the capabilities of the Armed Forces, to enhance 
the readiness of the Armed Forces, to support the men and women of the 
                 Armed Forces, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rebuilding America's Military Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF THE ARMED 
              FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES.

    It is the sense of Congress that Congress should enact 
legislation--
            (1) to restore and enhance the capabilities of the Armed 
        Forces for deterrence, combat, and post-conflict operations;
            (2) to enhance the readiness of the Armed Forces, including 
        by the reset of military equipment; and
            (3) to support the men and women of the Armed Forces, 
        including the members of the National Guard and Reserves, 
        through the provision of quality health care and enhanced 
        educational assistance.
                                 <all>
```
USA Warehouse: iUASinc.com
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 97 (Thursday, May 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12473]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-233-001]


Midwestern Gas Pipeline Transmission; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 12, 2000.
    Take notice on May 9, 2000, Midwestern Gas Transmission Company 
(Midwestern), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 1, the revised tariff sheets identified 
below, with an effective date of May 1, 2000:

Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet No. 90
Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 98
Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 99
Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 100
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 101
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 110A

    Midwestern states that this filing is in compliance with the 
Commission's April 26, 2000 Order Accepting Tariff Sheets Subject to 
Conditions in the above-referenced docket (April 26 Order). Midwestern 
Gas Transmission Company, 91 FERC para. 61,099 (2000).
    Midwestern further states that the April 26 Order required 
Midwestern to file revised tariff language that would (1) Correct the 
Gas Industry Standards Board version reference in its tariff; and (2) 
specify the requirements of the waiver set forth in 18 CFR 284.8(i) of 
the Commission's regulations. Midwestern requests an effective date of 
May 1, 2000.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. 
This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-12473 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6823

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL COWEN, a/k/a Mr. Ross,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District 

Judge. (6:07-cr-00034-NKM-2; 6:10-cv-80282-NKM-mfu)

Submitted: October 13, 2011 Decided: October 18, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Cowen, Appellant Pro Se. Charlene Day, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, C. Patrick Hogeboom, III, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Cowen seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Cowen has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny his motions for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas S. McHugh, Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                                         
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: June 10, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas S. McHugh                    
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Thomas S. McHugh Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as our exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be deemed to be considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 97 (Thursday, May 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12630]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


National Nuclear Security Administration; Postponement of Scoping 
Meeting for the Proposed Relocation of the Los Alamos National 
Laboratory Technical Area 18 Missions

AGENCY: Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration.

ACTION: Postponement of scoping meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On May 2, 2000, the Department of Energy (DOE) announced in 
the Federal Register, (65 FR 25472), that it would hold scoping 
meetings for the proposal to relocate missions at Technical Area 18 
(TA-18). Due to the recent fire at the Los Alamos National Laboratory 
(LANL), the scoping meeting scheduled for May 17, 2000 at the Betty 
Ehart Senior Center, 2132 Central Avenue, Los Alamos, NM, has been 
postponed. DOE will provide notice of the new date, time, and location 
for this meeting when it becomes available. DOE regrets any 
inconvenience for this postponement. Any questions associated with the 
TA-18 Project can be asked by calling Mr. Jay Rose at 1-800-832-0885, 
ext. 65484.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., this 15th day of May 2000.
Henry Garson,
NEPA Compliance Officer, Office of Defense Programs, Department of 
Energy.
[FR Doc. 00-12630 Filed 5-16-00; 1:33 pm]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7630

In Re: ROY HORTON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-93-40)

Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 30, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy Horton, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Roy Horton has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking

an order directing the district court to provide him with a copy of

a detention order. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in

extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,

426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when

there are no other means by which the relief sought could be

granted, In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may

not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers,

595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). The party seeking mandamus

relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has “no other

adequate means to attain the relief he desires” and that his right

to such relief is “clear and indisputable.” Allied Chem. Corp. v.

Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Horton has not made such a

showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion to proceed in forma pauperis and deny mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
* Pursuant to 5TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41847 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus IGNACIO HERNANDEZ-BELTRAN, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:05-CR-577

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ignacio Hernandez-Beltran appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for being unlawfully present in the United States after deportation following an aggravated felony conviction. He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and contends that his challenge is not barred by the appeal-waiver provision in hisNo. 05-41847 -2- plea agreement. The Government seeks enforcement of the waiver provision. We assume, arguendo only, that the waiver does not bar the instant appeal. Although Hernandez-Beltran contends that Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi , we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Hernandez-Beltran properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez- Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.
AFFIRMED.