alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### European American Bank, Respondent-Appellant, v Superior Auto Sales, Inc., Appellant-Respondent.

[698 NYS2d 630]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered February 1, 1999, which, in an action for breach of warranty arising out of defendant importer’s delivery of cars to plaintiffs assignor, a car dealership, that did not meet Federal and State safety requirements, upon the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment, awarded plaintiff judgment on the issue of liability and dismissed plaintiffs claim for punitive damages, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs assignor was a third-party beneficiary of defendant’s contract with the Canadian exporter to deliver cars to plaintiffs assignor, and, accordingly, plaintiff has a cause of action for breach of warranty even though there was no buyer-seller relationship between defendant and plaintiffs assignor *(see, Dormitory Auth. v Baker,*218 AD2d 515). In addition, even assuming that defendant could prove that plaintiffs assignor knew of and consented to the warranty agreement limiting defendant’s liability to repair and replacement, any such agreement cannot be enforced because, as confirmed by regulatory authority, repair and replacement of the noncomplying parts was not a legal option *(see, Consolidated Data Terms, v Applied Digital Data Sys.,*708 F2d 385, 392). However, plaintiff fails to show that defendant’s conduct is actionable as an independent tort, egregious in nature, part of a pattern directed at the public generally, or otherwise warrants an award of punitive damages *(see, New York Univ. v Continental Ins. Co.,*87 NY2d 308, 315-316). We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur— Williams, J. P., Rubin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.
§ 1952.2 Oregon. ( a ) The Oregon State plan received initial approval on December 28, 1972.
( b ) The Oregon State plan received final approval on May 12, 2005.
( c ) Under the terms of the 1978 Court Order in *AFL-CIO* v. *Marshall,* compliance staffing levels (“benchmarks”) necessary for a “fully effective” enforcement program were required for each State operating an approved State plan. In October 1992, Oregon completed, in conjunction with OSHA, a reassessment of the health staffing level initially established in 1980 and proposed a revised health benchmark of 28 health compliance officers. Oregon elected to retain the safety benchmark level established in the 1980 Report to the Court of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in 1980 of 47 safety compliance officers. After opportunity for public comment and service on the AFL-CIO, the Assistant Secretary approved these revised staffing requirements on August 11, 1994.
( d ) The plan covers all private-sector employers and employees, with several notable exceptions, as well as State and local government employers and employees, within the State. For current information on these exceptions and for additional details about the plan, please visit *http://www.osha.gov/dcsp/osp/stateprogs/oregon.html .*
EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-30137, 33-63086
and 2-93666) of our report dated February 16, 1996, except for Note 13 as to
which the date is March 13, 1996, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule of Keystone Consolidated Industries,
Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 and for the years ended
December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993, which report is included in this Annual Report
on form 10-K.





Dallas, Texas
[No. 47832-0-I.

Division One.

October 28, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Tony Douglas Robinson, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Whatcom County, No. 00-1-00718-6, Steven J. Mura, J., entered November 22, 2000. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
§ 1960.31 Inspections by OSHA. ( a ) The Secretary or the Secretary's representatives are authorized to conduct, when the Secretary deems necessary, announced or unannounced inspections in the following situations: ( 1 ) Where an agency has not established occupational safety and health committees or where committees no longer operate in conformance to the requirements of subpart F of this part;
( 2 ) In response to a request from half the membership of record of any certified safety and health committee; and
( 3 ) In response to an employee's report of an imminent danger situation, where there is a certified committee, but where the Secretary determines that neither the agency nor the committee has responded to the employee.
( b ) The Secretary's inspectors or evaluators are authorized: to enter without delay, and at reasonable times, any building, installation, facility, construction site, or other area, workplace, or environment where work is performed by employees of the agency; to inspect and investigate during regular working hours and at other reasonable times, and within reasonable limits and in a reasonable manner, any such place of employment, and all pertinent conditions, structures, machines, apparatus, devices, equipment, and materials therein, and to question privately any employee, any supervisory employee, and/or any official in charge of an establishment.
( c ) The Secretary may also make scheduled inspections as an integral part of OSHA's evaluation of an agency's safety and health program in accordance with subpart J of this part.
( d ) OSHA inspections shall follow the general format set forth for agency inspections in other applicable parts of this subpart.
NUMBER                      TravelNow.com Inc.                       SHARES

              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                       75,000,000 TOTAL AUTHORIZED SHARES
            50,000,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.01 PAR VALUE EACH
           25,000,000 SHARES OF PREFERRED STOCK, $0.01 PAR VALUE EACH

                                                             CUSIP  ___________

            THIS CERTIFICATE IS SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIONS OF TRANSFER.
                      SEE REVERSE FOR RESTRICTIVE LEGEND.

This Certifies that ___________________________________________ is the owner of
______________________ Shares of the Capital Stock of

                               TravelNow.com Inc.

transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

  In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunder
affixed this _____________ day of ________________ A.D.

DATED:

                                     [SEAL]
---------------                      ------              -----------------------
Secretary                                                Chief Executive Officer

Countersigned:
Florida Atlantic Stock Transfer, Inc.
7130 Nob Hill Rd., Tamarac, FL 33321

By:
----------------------------
      Transfer Agent
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 98 (Friday, May 19, 2000)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 31785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12840]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 98 / Friday, May 19, 2000 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 31785]]

                Executive Order 13156 of May 17, 2000

                
Amendment to Executive Order 12871 Regarding the 
                National Partnership Council

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, and in order to provide for a uniform policy 
                for the Federal Government relating to labor-management 
                partnerships, it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 
                12871, as amended by Executive Order 12983, is further 
                amended as follows:

                Section 1. Section 1(a)(10) of the order is amended by 
                striking ``two'' and inserting ``three.''

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    May 17, 2000.

[FR Doc. 00-12840
Filed 5-18-00; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
#### § 2700.83 Authority to sign orders.

The Chairman or other designated Commissioner is authorized to sign on behalf of the Commissioners, orders disposing of the following procedural motions: motions for extensions of time, motions for permission to file briefs in excess of page limits, motions to accept late filed briefs, motions to consolidate, motions to expedite proceedings, motions for oral argument, and similar procedural motions. A person aggrieved by such an order may, within 10 days of the date of the order, file a motion requesting that the order be signed by the participating Commissioners.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
Nos. 2-89135; 33-13618; and 33-28533 of Kinark Corporation on Forms S-8 and
No. 333-61393 on Form S-3 our report dated February 18, 2000 (except as to
Note 12 for which the date is March 14, 2000), appearing in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Kinark Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1999.


/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP
------------------------
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Tulsa, Oklahoma
April 5, 2000
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
   /s/ James J. AbelJames J. AbelExecutive Vice President, Secretary,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland Bancshares, Inc.,
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the
date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, James C. Clinard, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Martha J. Kelley, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|    |  |                                                                    
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ James C. Clinard                                               
|    |  |                                                                    
|    |  | James C. Clinard
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003
|    |  |                                                                    
|    |  |                                                                    
|    |  | /s/ Martha J. Kelley                                               
|    |  |                                                                    
|    |  | Martha J. Kelley
Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003
# j ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 24-0006

IN RE MOTION FOR ADMISSION UPON UNIFORM BAR EXAMINATION SCORE TRANSFER ORDER

Charles J. L. Jaskolski has filed a petition for admission to the State Bar ofMontana pursuant to Rule IV of the Rules for Admission to the Bar of the State of Montana, governing admission upon Uniform Bar Examination score transfer. The Bar Admissions Administrator ofthe State Bar ofMontana has informed the Court that the Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Jaskolski has provided the necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission under Rule IV ofthe Rules for Admission to the State Bar ofMontana. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and competition of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator, Charles J. L. Jaskolski may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State ofMontana. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to the Petitioner and the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this I 3 day ofAugust, 2024.

ChiefJustice 

# FILEO 3 2024 ood n Greer" ' rt Uri tInvve, supreme cletZ tle Of ivInntar

10 08/13/2024

Case Number: PR 24-0006
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 198/5 ag

| | ISSN 1725-2466 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell'Unione europea | C 198 |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 47o anno5 agosto 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2466

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell'Unione europea

C 198

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

47o anno5 agosto 2004

---

| Numero d'informazione | Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Comunicazioni |
| | Commissione |
| 2004/C 198/1 | Tassi di cambio dell'euro | 1 |

Numero d'informazione

Sommario

pagina

I   Comunicazioni

Commissione

2004/C 198/1

Tassi di cambio dell'euro

1

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

I Comunicazioni

Commissione

| 5.8.2004 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea | C 198/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2004

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea

C 198/1

---

Tassi di cambio dell'euro (1)

4 agosto 2004

(2004/C 198/01)

1 euro=

| | Moneta | Tasso di cambio |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | dollari USA | 1,1983 |
| JPY | yen giapponesi | 133,72 |
| DKK | corone danesi | 7,4352 |
| GBP | sterline inglesi | 0,65960 |
| SEK | corone svedesi | 9,1938 |
| CHF | franchi svizzeri | 1,5394 |
| ISK | corone islandesi | 86,33 |
| NOK | corone norvegesi | 8,4145 |
| BGN | lev bulgari | 1,9558 |
| CYP | sterline cipriote | 0,57940 |
| CZK | corone ceche | 31,769 |
| EEK | corone estoni | 15,6466 |
| HUF | fiorini ungheresi | 250,14 |
| LTL | litas lituani | 3,4528 |
| LVL | lats lettoni | 0,6527 |
| MTL | lire maltesi | 0,4245 |
| PLN | zloty polacchi | 4,4350 |
| ROL | leu rumeni | 40 954 |
| SIT | tolar sloveni | 240,0100 |
| SKK | corone slovacche | 40,120 |
| TRL | lire turche | 1 782 400 |
| AUD | dollari australiani | 1,7079 |
| CAD | dollari canadesi | 1,5844 |
| HKD | dollari di Hong Kong | 9,3465 |
| NZD | dollari neozelandesi | 1,8624 |
| SGD | dollari di Singapore | 2,0667 |
| KRW | won sudcoreani | 1 399,08 |
| ZAR | rand sudafricani | 7,5483 |

Moneta

Tasso di cambio

USD

dollari USA

1,1983

JPY

yen giapponesi

133,72

DKK

corone danesi

7,4352

GBP

sterline inglesi

0,65960

SEK

corone svedesi

9,1938

CHF

franchi svizzeri

1,5394

ISK

corone islandesi

86,33

NOK

corone norvegesi

8,4145

BGN

lev bulgari

1,9558

CYP

sterline cipriote

0,57940

CZK

corone ceche

31,769

EEK

corone estoni

15,6466

HUF

fiorini ungheresi

250,14

LTL

litas lituani

3,4528

LVL

lats lettoni

0,6527

MTL

lire maltesi

0,4245

PLN

zloty polacchi

4,4350

ROL

leu rumeni

40 954

SIT

tolar sloveni

240,0100

SKK

corone slovacche

40,120

TRL

lire turche

1 782 400

AUD

dollari australiani

1,7079

CAD

dollari canadesi

1,5844

HKD

dollari di Hong Kong

9,3465

NZD

dollari neozelandesi

1,8624

SGD

dollari di Singapore

2,0667

KRW

won sudcoreani

1 399,08

ZAR

rand sudafricani

7,5483

---

(1)

Fonte: tassi di cambio di riferimento pubblicati dalla Banca centrale europea.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lite King Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


Date:  May 12, 2006                     By:      /s/ David L. Norris
                                                 -------------------
                                        Name:    David L. Norris
                                        Title:   Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lite King Corporation
and will be retained by Lite King Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



The following is a list of the Company's subsidiaries:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    Percentage        Jurisdiction of
Name                                Owned             Incorporation
----                                -----             -------------
<S>                                 <C>               <C>
LeaRonal (UK) plc                   100%              England

LeaRonal AG                          93%              Switzerland

LeaRonal GmbH                       100%              Germany

LeaRonal France                      85%              France

LeaRonal Korea, Inc.                 80%              South Korea

LeaRonal Asia Ltd.                   80%              Hong Kong

LeaRonal Singapore Pte, Ltd.         86%              Singapore

LeaRonal Taiwan Co. Ltd.             80%              Taiwan

LeaRonal Pacific Corp.              100%              New York

Lea-Ronal Export Sales, Inc.        100%              New York

Ronal Foreign Sales Corp.           100%              U.S. Virgin Islands
</TABLE>
§ 2530.203-1 Vesting; general. ( a ) Section 203 of the Act and section 411(a) of the Code contain minimum vesting standards relating to certain employee pension benefit plans. In general, a pension plan subject to section 203 of the Act of section 411(a) of the Code must meet certain requirements relating to an employee's nonforfeitable (“vested”) right to his or her normal retirement benefit. One of these requirements specifies that an employee's accrued benefit derived from employer contributions must be vested in accordance with certain schedules. The schedules (or alternative minimum vesting standards) are generally based on the employee's number of years of service with the employer or employers maintaining the plan. Section 2530.203-2 sets forth rules relating to the computation periods used to determine whether an employee has completed a year of service for vesting purposes (“vesting computation periods”).
( b ) For rules relating to service with the employer or employers maintaining the plan, *see* § 2530.210.
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 012

Attachment Name

Attachment 12 PbNbTiZrO process Fiow

Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.2, SecA, 1d. (#5)

Does not contain CBI

Report Number

CONSi 10317786855351
0 0

00

'-4 0

oo

0 'o

z 0z

I 0

- ccn

to 70 

k C:)

(D 4-4 0 40

0

00

n 644

00 0-

00

N0

k 0 m0~

00 04'~

Et 0-0

0 N A0. S~ 00 

0 cjz
-4~ 0-

0

00 -j c

2 >

Zcoo 0 0

o -

H

0 0 0 @ 0 0 00m

-o ot E 

V :5

0 4--

0 00 0

S 0 "-. 'o 0: 

o 0 -o.

0.,2

.o~ Q 4;4 c(

00 :

L4- CO) 0 0 

.4-4
00

00

0

0

4

-4;-

00

00

4-4

1-4 0 (D-C

0 ~ ~ 4, ~ +MC f 4

U - 1

CL 0 o

C.Ii c 00

-;-
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 4
P090075.eng.sanitized

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 09-0075

Focus Ready Draft 12/11/2008

ENGINEER: Hall \ JAS

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Label: No

CRSS :

Chemical Name: 

S-H20: 0.00129 g/L @

VP: 1.4E-4 torr @

MW: 211.00 %<500 %<1000

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (12/02/2008):

Migration to groundwater: Slow

PBT rating: P2B1T2

Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1 ppb)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

None.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 09-0075

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same

medium.

Page 1

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 4
P090075.eng.sanitized

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis: 

Inhalation:

Dermal:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 09-0075

Number of Sites/ Location: 

unknown site(s)

Days/yr: 

Basis: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same

medium.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 09-0075

Number of Sites/ Location: 

unknown site(s)

Days/yr: 

Basis: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same

medium.

Page 2

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 4
P090075.eng.sanitized

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis: 

Inhalation:

Dermal:

Page 3

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 4
#### ERIE COUNTY FARMERS’ INSURANCE CO v CRECELIUS

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21935.

Decided April 2, 1930

Kinkade, Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.