alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Reporting Requirements Submitted for OMB Review.

# SUMMARY:

                        Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting and recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to publish a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         notifying the public that the agency has made such a submission.                     

# DATES:

Submit comments on or before June 23, 2000. If you intend to comment but cannot prepare comments promptly, please advise the OMB Reviewer and the Agency Clearance Officer before the deadline. 

# COPIES:

Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the Agency Clearance Officer. 

# ADDRESSES:

Address all comments concerning this notice to: Agency Clearance Officer, Jacqueline White, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20416; and OMB Reviewer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20503. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jacqueline White, Agency Clearance Officer, (202) 205-7044. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Title:*                     Request for Information Concerning Portfolio Financing.                

*Form No:*                     SBA Form-857.                

*Frequency:*                     On Occasion.                

*Description of Respondents:*                     SBIC Investment Companies.                

*Annual Responses:*                     2,160.                

*Annual Burden:*                     2,160.                

Jacqueline White,

Chief, Administrative Information Branch.

[FR Doc. 00-12984 Filed 5-23-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 2- 35 78

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
The op hi le J. Tak en Ali ve
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ct of S ou th Dako ta - Sio ux Fal ls

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: May 13, 2 01 3 Fi le d: May 22, 2 01 3 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, MURPHY, an d S MITH, Ci rcu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

The o p h i l e Tak en Ali ve was co nv ic te d of a fed eral se x of fen se in Feb ru ary 20 02

. The n in 20 12 , Tak en Ali ve was ch arg ed wit h fai li ng to up da te hi s reg is tra ti on
as req ui red by t h e Sex Offen de r Reg is tra ti on an d Not ifi cat io n Act (SORNA). 42 U.S.C. § 16 90 1 et se q. He m ov ed to di sm is s th e in di ct m en t on th e ba si s of a cl ai m whi ch we ha ve al read y reject ed

. Tak en Ali ve arg ue s th at th e Att or ne y Gen eral can no tc o n s t i t ut io na ll y be gi ve n au th or it y to de te rm in e SORNA's ap pl ic ab il it y to se x

of fen de rs who were co nv ic te d be fo re th e st at ut e's en act m en t, 42 U.S.C. § 16 91 3( d) , ci ti ng th e no nd el eg at io n do ct rin e of th e Uni te d St at es Co ns ti tu ti on

. See Pan am a Ref. Co

. v

. R ya n, 29 3 U.S. 38 8, 42 1 (1 93 5)

. The di st ric t co ur t up he ld th e 1

co ns ti tu ti on al it y of th e act

. Tak en Ali ve th en co nd it io na ll y pl ead gu il ty, res erv in g th e rig ht to ap pe al th e n on de le ga ti on is su e.

A le gi sl at iv e en act m en t do es no t vi ol at e th e no nd el eg at io n cl au se so lo ng a s th e la w co nt ai ns an "i nt el li gi bl e pr in ci pl e" to gu id e t h e im pl em en ti ng au th or it y

. M i s t r e t t a v. Uni te d St at es , 48 8 U.S. 36 1, 37 2 (1 98 9)

. W e rece nt ly co ns id ered

no nd el eg at io n ch al le ng es to SORNA in Uni te d St at es v. Ku e h l , 7 0 6 F .3d 91 7 (8 th Ci r. 20 13 ), an d Uni te d St at es v. F e r n a n d e z , 71 0 F.3 d 84 7 (8 th Ci r. 20 13 ). W e
conc lud ed the re th at SORNA co nt ai ns an "i nt el li gi bl e pr in ci pl e" gu id in g th e Att or ne y Gen eral ' s e x e r ci se of de le ga te d au th or it y

. Kue hl , 70 6 F.3 d at 92 0; Fern an de z, 71 0 F.3 d at 84 9. As Tak en A l i v e ' s ch al le ng e is id en ti cal to th e qu es ti on rai se d an d de ci de d i n Ku eh l an d F ern an de z, we affi rm th e jud gm en t o f th e d is tri ct co ur t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

Th e H o n o r ab le Lawren ce L. Pi ers ol , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e 1 Dis tri ct of So ut h Dak ot a, ad op ti ng th e rep or t an d reco m m en da ti on of th e Hon or ab le Jo hn E. Sim

ko , Uni te d S ta te s M ag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ct of S ou th Dako ta

. -2

-
Exhibit 10.23
 VECTOR GROUP LTD.
100 S.E. Second Street, 32nd Floor
Miami, Florida 33131




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 



Very truly yours,
VECTOR GROUP LTD.By:
    /s/ Howard M. LorberHoward M. LorberPresident and Chief Executive Officer AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:/s/ J. Bryant Kirkland IIIJ. Bryant Kirkland III




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 
  
 o
    
    my check in the amount of $.
 o
    
    Shares having a total value of $, such value
being based on the closing price(s) of the Shares on the date hereof.
  Number of Certificates
     and DenominationsNameAddressSocial Security No.
  Very truly yours,
J. Bryant Kirkland III
#### JONES v STATE

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 10834.

Decided June 23, 1930

A. G. Levine, Cleveland, for Jones.

Ray T. Miller, Cleveland, for State.

LEVINE, J.

The evidence seems to us conclusive that while it is true that Russell took the automobile without the owner’s consent, he did not intend to appropriate the same to his own use and thus deprive the owner permanently of its use.

Russell Jones is eighteen years of age and the record discloses that this act of his occurred on the occasion of a New Year’s eve celebration at ,a place where he and others were drinking intoxicating liquor; that he wandered off by himself, took this machine which was stationed on the street, and after driving it for some distance returned it to the original place.

The evidence is overwhelming that he did not intend to deprive the owner permanently of his property.

Had the jury returned a verdict under the second count, namely that of driving the .automobile without the owner’s consent, this court could not interfere with such finding. It is clear, however, that the verdict finding him guilty of larceny is manifestly and overwhelmingly against the weight of the evidence.

Holding as we do the judgment of the Common Pleas Court is ordered reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings according to law.

Vickery, PJ, and Sullivan, J, concur.
#### ROUBICHEK v STATE

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No. 10296.

Decided November 11, 1929

Mr.' L. Fernberg, Esq., Cleveland, for Roubichek.

Mr. B. Levine, Esq., Cleveland, for State.

VICKERY, PJ.

We have gone over this record and we think that there is not enough evidence in this record to sustain the conviction. It seems that the plaintiff in error was about to rent a storeroom and for that purpose went to the storeroom to meet the landlord; and shortly after he entered the storeroom, while waiting for the landlord, the officers came in, they having, had considerable trouble with the former tenant of this property; and after they made a thorough search of the premises, in a distant room they found a half pint of liquor and the plaintiff in error was arrested and found guilty as before stated.

Now the evidence shows that he had *20not rented this place and he denied that this -liquor was his or that he had any knowledge of it and there is no evidence in this record to contradict this statement, As a matter of fact he did not rent the premises and did not become a tenant and we do not think there is sufficient evidence in this record to warrant the conviction of this man.

The judgment will, therefore, be reversed and there being no evidence to connect him with the liquor even if there had been a trafficking by a former tenant, there is nothing for the court to do but to order his discharge.

The judgment therefore will be reversed and the defendant discharged.

Sullivan and Levine, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-37,378]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on February 22, 2000, in response to a petition filed on the same date on behalf of workers at Bugbee & Niles Company, Incorporated, Providence, Rhode Island.

The company official submitting the petition has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC this 10th day of May 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-12769 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,529
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,839
<ALLOWANCES>                                       320
<INVENTORY>                                      7,120
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,380
<PP&E>                                          20,171
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,423
<BONDS>                                          4,604
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,749
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,142
<SALES>                                         37,719
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,719
<CGS>                                           30,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,403
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    30
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 337
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,286)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (350)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (936)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (936)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 4003.52 When to file.

Except as provided in §§ 4003.4 and 4003.5, an appeal under this subpart must be filed within 45 days after the date of the initial determination being appealed or, when administrative review includes a procedure in part 4903 of this chapter, by the date that is specified in PBGC's notice of the right to request review.

[61 FR 34012, July 1, 1996, as amended at 75 FR 68205, Nov. 5, 2010; 85 FR 10284, Feb. 24, 2020]
Exhibit 10.27

 

June 26, 2002

 

Alison B. Fleming 

***

 

Dear Alison,

 

Collegium Pharmaceutical is very pleased to present you with the following offer to join the Collegium Team. We hope that you find the terms acceptable and would like to express our desire that you come aboard!

 

Position: Project Manager- Scientist

 

Reports to: Founders (initially)

 

Responsibilies: Responsible for all facets of project management (on an assigned project) required to commercialize Collegium’s intellectual property. This includes, but is not limited to, background research, patent filings, protocol development, project tracking, budgeting, negotiating contracts, working in the lab, customer presentations, etc.

 

Compensation:

 

1)    Salary- $65,000 annually

2)    Cash Bonus- eligible for up to 25% of base salary in annual bonus

 

Stock Options: 25,000 shares at fair market value at the time of hire (initial grant)

 

Benefits: Company will provide or reimburse you for your health benefits (30% employee contribution). The company expects to continue to offer benefits commensurate with companies its size as it grows.

 

Start Date: TBD. Goal: Oct 1, 2002. (as soon as possible)

 

Alison, as you have heard from the founders and Alex Klibanov, we are all very excited about the potential of Collegium. We have built an impressive IP portfolio, in addition to

 











 

assembling a group of “world class” Scientific Partners in a very short period of time. We now need to build the critical infrastructure that will assist us to commercialization of this portfolio. We believe your impressive accomplishments and demonstrated skill set would be a valuable asset to the company. We expect it will be an intellectually challenging environment where we can all learn from each other. We believe that you would be able to jump in immediately and add value to the company.

 

Please let me know if you have any questions, and we will be in touch in the next few days to answer your questions and hopefully plan the next steps.

 

 

	
Best Regards,
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Mike Heffernan
    	
 
    


 

 

CC: Jane Hirsh, Mark Hirsh, Michael Rothman
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Employment /
              - 2.11 Full-Time, Year-Round - Civilians with Disabilities Ages 18-64 Years Living in the Community for the U.S.

## Table 2.11: Employment: Full-Time, Year-Round (FTYR)—Civilians with Disabilities Ages 16 to 64 Years Living in the Community for the United States and States: 2012

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
#### § 33.8 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in §§ 33.9 and 33.10 of this part, no qualified individual with handicaps shall, because the Department's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by individuals with handicaps, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the Department.

[52 FR 11606, Apr. 9, 1987; 52 FR 23967, June 26, 1987]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 925 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 925

 To provide for funding assistance under section 406 of the Robert T. 
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5172) 
to a State or local government for the acquisition of real property for 
 the purpose of the replacement of certain public facilities based on 
reasonable reliance of cost estimates provided by the Federal Emergency 
                           Management Agency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 20, 2007

 Ms. Landrieu introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for funding assistance under section 406 of the Robert T. 
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5172) 
to a State or local government for the acquisition of real property for 
 the purpose of the replacement of certain public facilities based on 
reasonable reliance of cost estimates provided by the Federal Emergency 
                           Management Agency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ASSISTANCE FOR CERTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES DAMAGED AS A RESULT 
              OF HURRICANE KATRINA OR HURRICANE RIT.

    The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall 
make a contribution of funds under section 406 of the Robert T. 
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5172) 
to a State or local government for the replacement of a public 
facility, if--
            (1) that facility was damaged as a result of Hurricane 
        Katrina or Hurricane Rita;
            (2) based on a cost estimate provided by the Federal 
        Emergency Management Agency to that State or local government, 
        the extent of the damage would require the replacement of that 
        facility, instead of the repair, restoration, or reconstruction 
        of that facility;
            (3) that State or local government acquired real property 
        for the purpose of the replacement of that facility based on 
        reasonable reliance on the cost estimate described under 
        paragraph (2); and
            (4) such funds would otherwise be available to that State 
        or local government for that facility in accordance with that 
        Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 2570.157 Allocation of burden of proof.

For purposes of a final decision under § 2570.158 (Decision of the Administrative Law Judge) or § 2570.159 (Review by the Secretary), the petitioner shall have the burden of proof as to whether it meets 29 CFR 2510.3-40.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2426

SUE F. DAVIS, and on behalf on her children,

Katherine D. Davis and Charlise S. Davis, and

in class; DONNA MCCOMAS, individually and in

class,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

RHONE-POULENC, INCORPORATED, d/b/a RhonePoulenc Ag Company, a New York Corporation;

THE INSTITUTE PLANT OF WEST VIRGINIA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CA-96-525-2)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 28, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sue F. Davis, Donna McComas, Appellants Pro Se. Alvin Lee Emch,

Gretchen M. Callas, Mychal Schultz, JACKSON & KELLY, Charleston,

West Virginia, for Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order granting summary

judgment in favor of the Appellees and dismissing this civil

action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Rhone-Poulenc Inc., No.

CA-96-525-2 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 11, 1997). We deny Appellants’ motion

to have deposition transcripts made a part of the record on appeal

and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED