alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Vocational Rehabilitation /
              - 12.4 Vocational Rehabilitation—Rehabilitation Rate

## Table 12.4: Vocational Rehabilitation—Rehabilitation Rate: Federal Fiscal Year 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
# EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURUANT TO

# SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer and Vice President of Finance and Treasurer of Knape &
Vogt Manufacturing Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge:

| | (1) | The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 2, 2005 which this
          statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
          ended July 2, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
          condition and results of operations of Knape & Vogt Manufacturing Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 31, 2005

| |  | /s/ William R. Dutmers

William R. Dutmers Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
/s/ Leslie J. Cummings

Leslie J. CummingsVice President of Finance and Treasurer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Knape & Vogt
Manufacturing Company, and will be retained by Knape & Vogt Manufacturing Company, and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of BRENDAN REILLY ASSOCIATES, INC., Bankrupt. Quintino TESCIURA, d/b/a Mutual Trade Enterprises Company, Creditor-Appellant, Bernard WEINSTEIN, Trustee, Appellee, Cambridge Factors, Creditor-Appellee.

No. 413, Docket 30976.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued April 14, 1967.

Decided May 1, 1967.

*31Anthony B. Cataldo, New York City, for appellant Quintino Tesciuba.

Martin J. Caine, New York City, for trustee-appellee Bernard Weinstein.

Howard C. Amron, New York City (Bendes, Stark & Amron, New York City), for appellee Cambridge Factors.

Before MOORE, SMITH and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Brendan Reilly Associates, bankrupt, filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy on March 6, 1964, and was appointed debtor in possession on March 10, 1964.

Quintino Tesciuba, appellant and a creditor of the bankrupt, instituted a proceeding on April 2, 1964, to reclaim certain property in the possession of the bankrupt, allegedly belonging to appellant. Appellant’s petition was granted on April 29, 1964, and subsequently appellant recovered the property.

The bankrupt was adjudicated on October 13th, and the Trustee qualified on October 19, 1964. On May 11, 1965, the Trustee filed an application for a declaration of his rights, seeking vacation of the order of April 29, 1964, and permission to file an answer to the appellant’s reclamation petition of April 2, 1964.

Appellant moved for summary judgment against the Trustee on August 27, 1965. The motion was denied by the Referee and the denial confirmed by the District Court on June 28, 1966. Re-argument was denied on August 2, 1966.

Appellant appeals from the orders of the District Court dated June 28th and August 2nd, 1966.

The August 2, 1966, order denying reargument, is not appealable. In the Matter of Brendan Reilly Associates, Inc., 372 F.2d 235 (2d Cir. 1967).

The denial of a motion for summary judgment is an interlocutory order and normally not appealable. Chappell & Co. v. Frankel, 367 F.2d 197 (2d Cir. 1966); 6 Moore, Federal Practice ft 56.21 [2]. Interlocutory orders in proceedings in bankruptcy are appeal-able, 11 U.S.C.A. § 47, whereas such orders in controversies arising in proceedings in bankruptcy and in plenary actions brought by the Trustee are not. 6 Moore, Federal Practice ft 56.21 [2] pp. 2793-4.

The Trustee’s application in the present case asserted the invalidity of appellant’s title as against both the debtor in possession and the Trustee. As noted above, the prayer for relief *32sought vacation of the Court’s order establishing appellant’s right to the property and asked permission to file an answer to appellant’s reclamation claim.

It is apparent that the proceedings below involved a dispute between the Trustee and an adverse claimant over the right to possession of property. Such a dispute is clearly not a proceeding in bankruptcy, 2 Collier on Bankruptcy (14th Ed.) 24.29-24.32, and the denial of summary judgment is not appealable.

Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
# Diario Oficial C 171/1 de

| | ISSN 1725-244X |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 171 |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 47o año1 de julio de 2004 |

ISSN 1725-244X

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 171

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

47o año1 de julio de 2004

---

| Número de información | Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Comunicaciones |
| | Comisión |
| 2004/C 171/1 | Tipo de cambio del euro | 1 |

Número de información

Sumario

Página

I   Comunicaciones

Comisión

2004/C 171/1

Tipo de cambio del euro

1

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

I Comunicaciones

Comisión

| 1.7.2004 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | C 171/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2004

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

C 171/1

---

Tipo de cambio del euro (1)

30 de junio de 2004

(2004/C 171/01)

1 euro=

| | Moneda | Tipo de cambio |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | dólar estadounidense | 1,2155 |
| JPY | yen japonés | 132,40 |
| DKK | corona danesa | 7,4326 |
| GBP | libra esterlina | 0,67075 |
| SEK | corona sueca | 9,1451 |
| CHF | franco suizo | 1,5242 |
| ISK | corona islandesa | 88,33 |
| NOK | corona noruega | 8,4365 |
| BGN | lev búlgaro | 1,9559 |
| CYP | libra chipriota | 0,58150 |
| CZK | corona checa | 31,755 |
| EEK | corona estonia | 15,6466 |
| HUF | forint húngaro | 251,60 |
| LTL | litas lituana | 3,4529 |
| LVL | lats letón | 0,6570 |
| MTL | lira maltesa | 0,4263 |
| PLN | zloty polaco | 4,5236 |
| ROL | leu rumano | 40 626 |
| SIT | tólar esloveno | 239,9900 |
| SKK | corona eslovaca | 39,875 |
| TRL | lira turca | 1 805 300 |
| AUD | dólar autraliano | 1,7554 |
| CAD | dólar canadiense | 1,6343 |
| HKD | dólar de Hong Kong | 9,4803 |
| NZD | dólar neozelandés | 1,9210 |
| SGD | dólar de Singapur | 2,0901 |
| KRW | won de Corea del Sur | 1 404,45 |
| ZAR | rand sudafricano | 7,6177 |

Moneda

Tipo de cambio

USD

dólar estadounidense

1,2155

JPY

yen japonés

132,40

DKK

corona danesa

7,4326

GBP

libra esterlina

0,67075

SEK

corona sueca

9,1451

CHF

franco suizo

1,5242

ISK

corona islandesa

88,33

NOK

corona noruega

8,4365

BGN

lev búlgaro

1,9559

CYP

libra chipriota

0,58150

CZK

corona checa

31,755

EEK

corona estonia

15,6466

HUF

forint húngaro

251,60

LTL

litas lituana

3,4529

LVL

lats letón

0,6570

MTL

lira maltesa

0,4263

PLN

zloty polaco

4,5236

ROL

leu rumano

40 626

SIT

tólar esloveno

239,9900

SKK

corona eslovaca

39,875

TRL

lira turca

1 805 300

AUD

dólar autraliano

1,7554

CAD

dólar canadiense

1,6343

HKD

dólar de Hong Kong

9,4803

NZD

dólar neozelandés

1,9210

SGD

dólar de Singapur

2,0901

KRW

won de Corea del Sur

1 404,45

ZAR

rand sudafricano

7,6177

---

(1)

Fuente: tipo de cambio de referencia publicado por el Banco Central Europeo.

---
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Hayne Hipp, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Liberty Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. [Reserved];  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: October 25, 2005     /s/ Hayne Hipp     Hayne Hipp  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
42
§ 2530.200b-8 Determination of days of service to be credited to maritime employees. ( a ) *General rule.* For the purpose of determining the days of service which must be credited to an employee for a computation period, a plan shall determine days of service from records of days worked and days for which payment is made or due. Any records may be used to determine days of service to be credited to employees under a plan, even though such records are maintained for other purposes, provided that they accurately reflect the actual number of days of service with which an employee is required to be credited under § 2530.200b-7(a). Payroll records, for example, may provide sufficiently accurate data to serve as a basis for determining days of service. If, however, existing records do not accurately reflect the actual number of days of service with which an employee is entitled to be credited, a plan must develop and maintain adequate records. A plan may in any case credit days of service under any method which results in the crediting of no less than the actual number of days of service required to be credited under § 2530.200b-7(a) to each employee in a computation period, even though such method may result in the crediting of days of service in excess of the number of days required to be credited under § 2530.200b-7(a). A plan is not required to prescribe in its documents which records are to be used to determine days of service.
( b ) *Determination of pre-effective date days of service.* To the extent that a plan is required to determine days of service completed before the effective date of part 2 of title I of the Act (*see* section 211 of the Act), the plan may use whatever records may be reasonably accessible to it and may make whatever calculations are necessary to determine the approximate number of hours of service completed before such effective date. For example, if a plan or an employer maintaining the plan has, or has access to, only the records of compensation of employees for the period before the effective date, it may derive the pre-effective date days of service by using the daily rate for the period or the days customarily worked. If accessible records are insufficient to make an approximation of the number of pre-effective date days of service for a particular employee or group of employees, the plan may make a reasonable estimate of the days of service completed by such employee or employees during the particular period. For example, if records are available with respect to some employees, the plan may estimate the days of service of other employees in the same job classification based on these records. A plan may use the elapsed time method prescribed under § 2530.200b-9 to determine days of service completed before the effective date of part 2 of title I of the Act.
----

Action brought on 7 May 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-204/04)

(2004/C 201/14)

An action against the Federal Republic of Germany was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 7 May 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Nicola Yarrell, of the Commission's Legal Service, and Horstpeter Kreppel, a labour court judge appointed to the Commission's Legal Service under the exchange programme for national public servants, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The exclusion from eligibility for election to staff committees, for public sector workers employed by the Federal Republic and almost all Länder, of part-time employees who normally work less than 18 hours a week (the number of hours is somewhat less in certain Länder) constitutes indirect discrimination against women, as they form the great majority of part-time workers. This is accordingly in breach of Directive 76/207/EEC. The rules are also incompatible with Directive 97/81/EC, which provides that part-time workers may not be treated in a less favourable manner than full-time workers unless such different treatment is justified on objective grounds.

However, there are no objective grounds for the exclusion from eligibility for election. The restricted presence of the relevant employees in the workplace could be compensated for by the creation of flexible working time arrangements and modern means of communication. The Betriebsverfassungsgesetz (Law on labour relations at the workplace), which governs elections to works councils in the private sector, does not restrict eligibility for election in the same way. Such works councils perform the same functions as staff committees in the public sector. Representation of the excluded groups is necessary because they have separate interests, which otherwise would not be taken into account.

----

(1)  OJ 1976 L 39, p. 40.

(2)  OJ 1998 L 14, p. 9.

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 99 (Monday, May 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 32121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12700]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Reinstatement, Record of Decision on the Final General Management 
Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Missouri National 
Recreational River (59-Mile District), Nebraska and South Dakota

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, and the regulations promulgated 
by the Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR 1505.2), the National 
Park Service (NPS) is announcing the Record of Decision on the Final 
General Management Plan (GMP) and Final Environmental Impact Statement 
(FEIS) for the Missouri National Recreational River (MNRR), 59-Mile 
District. The MNRR is located in portions of Clay, Union, and Yankton 
counties, South Dakota and Cedar, Dixon, and Knox counties, Nebraska.
    More specifically, the NPS is reinstating a Record of Decision 
previously suspended by the bureau. After the Record of Decision was 
originally signed, it was discovered that the FEIS was inadvertently 
not filed with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as required by 
40 CFR 1506.9. Accordingly, the NPS suspended the Record of Decision 
(see 65 FR 10542), suspended implementation of the GMP, filed the FEIS 
with EPA, and reopened the required 30-day period of no-action.

DATES: The Regional Director, National Park Service, Midwest Region, 
and the District Engineer, Omaha District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 
approved the Record of Decision on December 17, 1999. That Record of 
Decision was reinstated effective April 10, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Hedren, Superintendent, Missouri 
National Recreational River, P.O. Box 591, O'Neill, Nebraska 68763, or 
by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6b2625393934381e1b0e1902051f0e050f0e051f2b051b18450c041d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="024f4c50505d51777267706b6c76676c66676c76426c72712c656d74">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 402-336-3970.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EPA published its notice of availability 
for the FEIS in the Federal Register on March 10, 2000 (65 FR 12992). 
The 30-day no-action period ended on April 10, 2000. No public comments 
were received during this period. Accordingly, the NPS has determined 
that no changes to the FEIS or the original Record of Decision are 
necessary. The Record of Decision as printed in the Federal Register on 
December 17, 1999 (64 FR 72359) is reinstated.

    Dated: May 8, 2000.
David N. Given,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 00-12700 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

----

I Informacja

Komisja

----

Kursy walutowe euro (1)

29 lipca 2004

(2004/C 194/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Źródło: referencyjny kurs wymiany walut opublikowany przez ECB.

----

----

Podsumowanie decyzji Wspólnoty w sprawie pozwoleń na dopuszczenie do obrotu produktów leczniczych w okresie od 15 czerwca 2004 r. do 15 lipca 2004 r.

(opublikowane na mocy art. 12 lub art. 34 rozporządzenia Rady (EWG) nr 2309/93 (1))

(2004/C 194/02)

–   Wydawanie pozwolenia na dopuszczenie do obrotu (art. 12 rozporządzenia Rady (EWG) nr 2309/93 (1)): Przyjęte

–   Zmiana pozwolenia na dopuszczenie do obrotu (art. 12 rozporządzenia Rady (EWG) nr 2309/93): Przyjęte

–   Wycofanie pozwolenia na dopuszczenie do obrotu (art. 12 rozporządzenia Rady (EWG) nr 2309/93)

----

(1)Dz.U. L 214 z 24.8.1993, str. 1

----

----

Podsumowanie decyzji Wspólnoty w sprawie pozwoleń na dopuszczenie do obrotu produktów leczniczych w okresie od 15 maja 2004 r. do 15 czerwca 2004 r.

(opublikowane na mocy art. 12 lub art. 34 rozporządzenia Rady (EWG) nr 2309/93 (1))

(2004/C 194/03)

—   Wydawanie pozwolenia na dopuszczenie do obrotu (art. 12 rozporządzenia Rady (EWG) nr 2309/93): Przyjęte

----

(1)Dz.U. L 214 z 24.8.1993, str. 1.

----

----

OGŁOSZENIE EX-POST SUBWENCJI EUROSTAT W 2003 R.

Informacja publiczna

(2004/C 194/04)

Zgodnie z art. 110 ust. 2 rozporządzenia finansowego i art. 169 przepisów wykonawczych, niniejszym informuje się opinię publiczną o działaniach subwencjonowanych podjętych przez Eurostat w roku 2003.

Plik elektroniczny opisujący te działania ma formę listy i znajduje się na serwerze EUROPA (http://europa.eu.int). Dostęp do tej listy jest możliwy przez kolejne zakładki: „Instytucje”, „Komisja”, „Statystyka”, „Działalność Eurostatu”, „Przetarg na subwencje” i dalej w pliku „Eurostat - Lista subwencji przyznanych w roku 2003”.

Lista określa numer dokumentacji, nazwę jednostki, nazwę i kraj korzystający z subwencji, rodzaj działania, kwotę wnioskowaną i wysokość współfinansowania danego działania.

Uprzednio miało miejsce ogłoszenie ex-ante dla wszystkich tych działań.

----

----

Uprzednie zgłoszenie koncentracji

(Sprawa nr COMP/M.M.3513 – Caterpillar/Xpart)

Sprawa kwalifikująca się do rozpatrzenia w ramach uproszczonej procedury

(2004/C 194/05)

(Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG)

----

(1)Dz.U. L 24 z 29.1.2004, str. 1.

(2)Dz.U. C 217 z 29.7.2000, str. 32. Rozporządzenie Rady (EWG) nr 4064/89 zostało zastąpione rozporządzeniem Rady (WE) nr 139/2004.

----