alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX4(b)(1) Amendment to Rights Plan


Exhibit 4(b)(1)




AMENDMENT NO. 1 to Stockholder Rights Agreement
between
CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
and
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as Rights Agent
This Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”), dated as of April 1, 2015, to the Stockholder Rights Agreement (the “Rights Agreement”), dated as of July 18, 2007, between Core Molding Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, a New York limited liability trust company, as rights agent (the “Rights Agent”), is being executed at the direction of the Company. Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Rights Agreement.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 27 of the Rights Agreement, the Company may, and the Rights Agent shall if the Company so directs, supplement or amend the Rights Agreement prior to the Distribution Date.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual agreements set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
		
	1. 
	Amendments 


a. Section 1(u) of the Rights Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
 “Final Expiration Date” shall mean 5:00 P.M., Columbus, Ohio time on April 1, 2015, unless the Rights are previously redeemed, exchanged or terminated.”


		
	b. 
	All references to the date of “July 18, 2017” in Exhibit B (the Form of Right Certificate) and Exhibit C (the Form of Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Stock) to the Rights Agreement shall hereby be changed to “April 1, 2015”.


2. Remaining Terms. Those portions of the Rights Agreement that are not expressly amended hereby shall continue in full force and effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Rights Agent and the Company acknowledge and agree that upon the Expiration Date the Rights Agreement shall terminate and be of no further force and effect.


 3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one agreement. A signature to this Amendment transmitted electronically shall have the same authority, effect and enforceability as an original signature.


 [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]









The parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed and delivered as of the date first written above.
 
    	
		
	 
	 

	CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

	 

	By:_/s/ John P. Zimmer______________

	Name: John P. Zimmer

	Title: Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer




 
    	
		
	 
	 

	AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC

	 

	By:_/s/ Michael A. Nespoli______________

	Name: Michael A. Nespoli
	 

	Title: Executive Director
	 








































[Signature Page to Amendment to Rights Agreement]
#### The State *against*the Judges of the Orphans’ Court of the county of *Burlington.*

ON CERTIORARI.

Division of mifsioners court set lands noTof6’ the estate set tiuMieirs3 (a)

AT the term of *November*1818, *Wall,*presented two affidavits whereby it appeared, that an application had been to the Orphans’ Court of *Burlington,*for the appointment of commissioners to divide the real estate of *Isaac*dec. That they made a division and report on the 11th of *February*1818 ; that this report was confirmed m the same month; that the whole of the land set off and divided to *Jemima South,*one of the heirs, (who was at the time of the division, and still continued an inhabitant of the state of Ohio) and part set off to *Rachel Ro*berts*and *Jane Rossell,*was contained in a deed given by said *Quigley,*on the 21st of *November*1780, to *Ebenezer Cowell,*and that *Cowell*went into possession of it at the date of the deed, and he and his heirs had continued in possession ever since.

• Upon these affidavits a certiorari was issued, directing the court to send up the report and order. Upon the return of the writ other affidavits were taken, which proved the facts before stated, and it was moved to set aside the report of the commissioners, upon the ground that they had divided lands not belonging to the estate of *Isaac Quigley,*and had not given any of his lands, to one of his heirs, and less than their proportion, to two others.

*Kinsey*objected.

That the certiorari ought to have been brought within three months; that the objection to the report ought to have been made within three months ; that the adverse claim of *Cowell*could not be tried here, and must be tried before a decision can be made in favour of Mrs. *South;*and that chancery had the jurisdiction over this matter.

*639
      *Wall*replied;

that Mrs. *South,*lived out of the state; that the writ was applied for as soon as could be done, from her situation ; that the division was made in *February,*the affidavit in *August,*and the motion in *November;*that the certiorari must necessarily be issued in three months, only in adversary suits, not in *ex parte*hearings ; that this was the only mode of reaching the evil; the application here was to the general superintending power of the court, which was sufficient for the purpose.

*See Bellerjeau vs. Real Estate of George Ely, 3 Hal. 273. Stokes vs. Middleton, 4 Dutch. 32. Young vs. Rathbone, 1 C. E. Gr. 225. Den. Richman vs. Baldwin, 1 Zab. 395. S. C. 1 Stock. 394. Van Riper vs. Berdan, 2 Gr. 133. N. J. R. R. Co. vs. Suydam, 2 Har. 62.*

The court

ordered that the division and report of the commissioners, and the order of the Orphans’ Court, be reversed and made void.
# C_2004227DE.01001501.xml

| 11.9.2004 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 227/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 227/15

---

Berichtigung der Bekanntmachung über die erneute Öffnung der Aufforderung zur Einreichung von Vorschlägen ohne festen Eingangstermin für indirekte Aktionen im Rahmen des mehrjährigen Aktionsplans der Gemeinschaft zur Förderung einer sichereren Nutzung des Internet und neuer Online-Technologien (2003/2004) (Internet-Aktionsplan)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 219 vom 1. September 2004
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 219 vom 1. September 2004

(2004/C 227/12)

Seite 8, zweiter Absatz:

anstatt:

„30. September 2004“

muss es heißen:

„29. Oktober 2004“.

---
POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned Director and/or
officer of Kinark Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby
constitutes and appoints Paul R. Chastain the true and lawful agent and
attorney-in-fact of the undersigned with full power of substitution and
authority to sign for the undersigned, as Director or an officer of the
Company, or as both, the Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for the period
ended December 31, 1999, and any and all exhibits and amendments thereto to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C. pursuant
to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; hereby
ratifying and confirming all acts taken by such agent and attorney-in-fact as
herein authorized.

Dated: March 29, 2000                   /s/ Joseph J. Morrow
                                        Joseph J. Morrow
§ 1975.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) Among other things, the Williams-Steiger Act poses certain duties on employers. This part has the limited purpose and scope of clarifying which persons are considered to be employers either as a matter of interpretation of the intent and terms of the Act or as a matter of policy appropriate to administering and enforcing the Act. In short, the purpose and scope of this part is to indicate which persons are covered by the Act as employers and, as such, subject to the requirements of the Act.
( b ) It is not the purpose of this part to indicate the legal effect of the Act, once coverage is determined. Section 4(b)(1) of the Act provides that the statute shall be inapplicable to working conditions to the extent they are subject to another Federal agency's exercise of different statutory authority affecting the occupational safety and health aspects of those conditions. Therefore, a person may be considered an employer covered by the Act, and yet standards issued under the Act respecting certain working conditions would not be applicable to the extent those conditions were subject to another agency's authority.
§ 37.84 What happens if CRC does not have jurisdiction over a complaint? If CRC does not have jurisdiction over a complaint, the Director must: ( a ) Notify the complainant and explain why the complaint falls outside the coverage of the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIA or this part; and
( b ) Where possible, transfer the complaint to an appropriate Federal, State or local authority.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

January 19, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00858

- CV

IN THE ESTATE OF RAYMOND OATMAN WHIPPLE, JR., DECEASED

,

From the County Court, Guadalupe County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006

- PC

- 0273 Honorable Robin V. Dwy er, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record and reporter’s record were due to be filed in this appeal on January 15, 2018. Both the trial court clerk and the court reporter have filed notifications of late record stating that the records have not been filed because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee s for preparing the record s and that appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee s . It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this

co urt within ten (10) days of the date of this order that either (1) the fees have been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the fees for preparing the clerk’s record and reporter’s record; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the fees . If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my ha nd and affixed the seal of the said court on this 19th day of January, 20 18

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### § 2702.12 Preservation of records.

Pursuant to title 44 of the United States Code or the General Records Schedule 4.2 of the National Archives and Records Administration, the Commission preserves all correspondence pertaining to requests received under this part, as well as copies of all requested records for 6 years following final agency action or 3 years after final adjudication by the courts, whichever is later. The Commission will not dispose of or destroy records while they are the subject of a pending request, appeal, or lawsuit under the FOIA.
§ 2520.104a-2 Electronic filing of annual reports. ( a ) Any annual report (including any accompanying statements or schedules) filed with the Secretary under part 1 of title I of the Act for any plan year (reporting year, in the case of common or collective trusts, pooled separate accounts, and similar non-plan entities) beginning on or after January 1, 2009, shall be filed electronically in accordance with the instructions applicable to such report, and such other guidance as the Secretary may provide.
( b ) Nothing in paragraph (a) of this section is intended to alter or affect the duties of any person to retain records or to disclose information to participants, beneficiaries, or the Secretary.
[71 FR 41368, July 21, 2006, as amended at 72 FR 64729, Nov. 16, 2007]
[No. 49715-4-I.

Division One.

November 12, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Terry Lee Callendret, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 01-1-06868-3, Michael S. Spearman and Charles W. Mertel, JJ., entered November 19, 2001. *Dismissed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001074404
<NAME>                        Xoma Limited
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          16,315
<SECURITIES>                                    11,952
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,906
<PP&E>                                          31,336
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,532
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,914
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                      (5,167)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,283
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    20
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,653
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 404
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (13,658)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13,658)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,658)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.28)
        


</TABLE>
§ 1917.30 Emergency action plans. ( a ) *Emergency action plans* — ( 1 ) *Scope and application.* This paragraph (a) requires all employers to develop and implement an emergency action plan.[3a] The emergency action plan shall be in writing (except as provided in paragraph (a)(5)(iv) of this section) and shall cover those designated actions employers and employees must take to ensure employee safety from fire and other emergencies.
( 2 ) *Elements.* The following elements, at a minimum, shall be included in the plan: ( i ) Emergency escape procedures and emergency escape route assignments;
( ii ) Procedures to be followed by employees who remain to operate critical plant operations before they evacuate;
( iii ) Procedures to account for all employees after emergency evacuation has been completed;
( iv ) Rescue and medical duties for those employees who are to perform them;
( v ) The preferred means of reporting fires and other emergencies; and
( vi ) Names or regular job titles of persons or departments that can be contacted for further information or explanation of duties under the plan.
( 3 ) *Alarm system.* The employer shall establish an employee alarm system that provides warning for necessary emergency action and for reaction time for safe escape of employees from the workplace or the immediate work area.
( 4 ) *Evacuation.* The employer shall establish the types of evacuation to be used in emergency circumstances.
( 5 ) *Training.* ( i ) Before implementing the emergency action plan, the employer shall designate and train a sufficient number of persons to assist in the safe and orderly emergency evacuation of employees.
( ii ) The employer shall review the plan with each employee covered by the plan at the following times: ( A ) Initially when the plan is developed;
( B ) Whenever the employee's responsibilities or designated actions under the plan change; and
( C ) Whenever the plan is changed.
( iii ) The employer shall review with each employee upon initial assignment those parts of the plan that the employee must know to protect the employee in the event of an emergency. The written plan shall be kept at the workplace and be made available for employee review.
( iv ) Employers with 10 or fewer employees may communicate the plan orally to employees and need not maintain a written plan
( b ) [Reserved]
[62 FR 40198, July 25, 1997, as amended at 65 FR 40938, June 30, 2000] Footnotes -
1917.30
[3a] When an employer directs his employees to respond to an emergency that is beyond the scope of the Emergency Action Plan developed in accordance with this section, then § 1910.120(q) of this chapter shall apply.
EXHIBIT 99.4

                     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with this annual report of Ultrapetrol (Bahamas) Limited
(the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:

     (3)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

      This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, and not for any other purpose.


Date: March 31, 2003

/s/ Alberto G. Deyros
--------------------------------
Alberto G. Deyros


Chief Financial Officer




02351.0001 #401975
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         218,483
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  228,150
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    113,533
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               567,187
<PP&E>                                         141,186
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (34,961)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 727,578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,510
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,026
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,885,101
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   655,068
<SALES>                                      1,030,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,030,535
<CGS>                                         (214,295)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               (1,585,610)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,939
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (543,136)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (543,136)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (543,136)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.45)



</TABLE>
§ 1984.106 Objections to the findings and the preliminary order and requests for a hearing. ( a ) Any party who desires review, including judicial review, of the findings and/or preliminary order, or a respondent alleging that the complaint was frivolous or brought in bad faith who seeks an award of attorney fees under section 18C of the FLSA, must file any objections and/or a request for a hearing on the record within 30 days of receipt of the findings and preliminary order pursuant to § 1984.105(b). The objections, request for a hearing, and/or request for attorney fees must be in writing and state whether the objections are to the findings and/or the preliminary order, and/or whether there should be an award of attorney fees. The date of the postmark, facsimile transmittal, or electronic transmittal is considered the date of filing; if the objection is filed in person, by hand-delivery or other means, the objection is filed upon receipt. Objections must be filed with the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Department of Labor, in accordance with 29 CFR part 18, and copies of the objections must be served at the same time on the other parties of record, the OSHA official who issued the findings and order, the Assistant Secretary, and the Associate Solicitor, Division of Fair Labor Standards, U.S. Department of Labor.
( b ) If a timely objection is filed, all provisions of the preliminary order will be stayed, except for the portion requiring preliminary reinstatement, which will not be automatically stayed. The portion of the preliminary order requiring reinstatement will be effective immediately upon the respondent's receipt of the findings and preliminary order, regardless of any objections to the order. The respondent may file a motion with the Office of Administrative Law Judges for a stay of the Assistant Secretary's preliminary order of reinstatement, which shall be granted only based on exceptional circumstances. If no timely objection is filed with respect to either the findings or the preliminary order, the findings and/or the preliminary order will become the final decision of the Secretary, not subject to judicial review.
[81 FR 70620, Oct. 13, 2016, as amended at 86 FR 1792, Jan. 11, 2021]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50219 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. JOSE DE JESUS QUIROZ-VILLADO Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1025-1 Before KING, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose De Jesus Quiroz-Villado (Quiroz) was convicted by a jury of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and was sentenced to 60 months of imprisonment and four years of supervised release. Quiroz argues on appeal that therewas insufficient evidence toshowthat he knew that the tractor-trailer that he was driving contained marijuana. However, when viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, a reasonable trier of fact could have found that the evidence established that United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November 13, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-50219

2 Quiroz’s suspicious actions, inconsistent statements, and implausible explanation indicated that he knewthat the tractor-trailer contained marijuana. See United States v. Resio-Trejo, 45 F.3d 907, 910 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Casilla, 20 F.3d 600, 606-07 (5th Cir. 1994); United States v. Martinez, 975 F.2d 159, 160-61 (5th Cir. 1992). AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements 
No. 33-67880, No. 33-87196, and No. 33-94888 of The First Years Inc. (formerly
Kiddie Products, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form S-8 of our report dated March 7,
1996, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The First Years Inc. for 
the year ended December 31, 1995.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 29, 1996


                                    IV-19