alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

	I, Neil F. M. McKay, certify that:

	1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Capitol Federal Financial;

	2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

	3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

	4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

		a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

		b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

		c)	disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and	

5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial report, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

		a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

		b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Date: February 4, 2004

By: /s/ Neil F. M. McKay                           
Neil F. M. McKay

						Chief Financial Officer
#### Margaret W. Donald, Appellant, *v.*City of New York et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.

Submitted September 28, 1937;

decided October 12, 1937.

*562
      *John J. O’Connell*for appellant.

*Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel (William S.*Gaud, *Jr.,*and *Paxton Blair*of counsel), for city of New York, respondent.

*Copal Mintz*and *Hyman Korn*for Charles A. Buckley, respondent.

*Murray D. Welch*for Ætna Casualty and Surety Company et al., impleaded defendants.

Order affirmed, with costs. First question certified answered in the affirmative. Second question certified answered in the negative. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  23 LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended
March  31,  2007,  as  filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the  undersigned,
Robert  P.  Johnson, President of AEI Fund Management XXI,  Inc.,
the  Managing Member of the Company, and Patrick W. Keene,  Chief
Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc., each certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              January 7, 2008



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              January 7, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,279
<PP&E>                                       9,536,147
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,938,222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,984,148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,439,234
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,505,065
<OTHER-SE>                                (10,025,151)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,984,148
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,294
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               684,449
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             591,961
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,268,116)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,268,116)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,268,116)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)
        


</TABLE>
§ 2530.204-3 Alternative computation methods for benefit accrual. ( a ) *General.* Under section 204(b)(3)(A) of the Act and section 411(b)(3)(A) of the Code, a defined benefit pension plan may determine an employee's service for purposes of benefit accrual on the basis of accrual computation periods, as specified in § 2530.204-2, or on any other basis which is reasonable and consistent and which takes into account all covered service during the employee's participation in the plan which is included in a period of service required to be taken into account under section 202(b) of the Act and section 410(a)(5) of the Code. If, however, a plan determines an employee's service for purposes of benefit accrual on a basis other than computation periods, it must be possible to prove that, despite the fact that benefit accrual under the plan is not based on computation periods, the plan's provisions meet at least one of the three benefit accrual rules of section 204(b)(1) of the Act and section 411(b)(1) of the Code under all circumstances. Further, a plan which does not provide for benefit accrual on the basis of computation periods may not disregard service under section 204(b)(3)(C) of the Act and section 411(b)(3)(C) of the Code.
( b ) *Examples.* The following are examples of methods of determining an employee's period of service for purposes of benefit accrual under which an employee's period of service is not determined on the basis of computation periods but which may be used by a plan provided that the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section are met: ( 1 ) *Career compensation.* A defined benefit formula based on a percentage of compensation earned in a participant's career or during participation, with no variance depending on hours completed in given periods.
( 2 ) *Credited hours.* A defined benefit formula pursuant to which an employee is credited with a specified amount of accrual for each hour of service (or hour worked or regular time hour) completed by the employee during his or her career.
( 3 ) *Elapsed time.* See § 2530.200b-9(e).
§ 2570.93 Parties, how designated. For 502(c)(5) civil penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of 29 CFR 18.10. ( a ) The term *party* wherever used in this subpart shall include any natural person, corporation, employee benefit plan, association, firm, partnership, trustee, receiver, agency, public or private organization, or government agency. A party against whom a civil penalty is sought shall be designated as “respondent.” The Department shall be designated as the “complainant.”
( b ) Other persons or organizations shall be permitted to participate as parties only if the administrative law judge finds that the final decision could directly and adversely affect them or the class they represent, that they may contribute materially to the disposition of the proceedings and their interest is not adequately represented by existing parties, and that in the discretion of the administrative law judge the participation of such persons or organizations would be appropriate.
( c ) A person or organization not named as a respondent wishing to participate as a party under this section shall submit a petition to the administrative law judge within fifteen (15) days after the person or organization has knowledge of or should have known about the proceeding. The petition shall be filed with the administrative law judge and served on each person or organization who has been made a party at the time of filing. Such petition shall concisely state: ( 1 ) Petitioner's interest in the proceeding;
( 2 ) How his or her participation as a party will contribute materially to the disposition of the proceeding;
( 3 ) Who will appear for petitioner;
( 4 ) The issues on which petitioner wishes to participate; and
( 5 ) Whether petitioner intends to present witnesses.
( d ) Objections to the petition may be filed by a party within fifteen (15) days of the filing of the petition. If objections to the petition are filed, the administrative law judge shall then determine whether petitioners have the requisite interest to be a party in the proceedings, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section, and shall permit or deny participation accordingly. Where petitions to participate as parties are made by individuals or groups with common interests, the administrative law judge may request all such petitioners to designate a single representative, or he or she may recognize one or more of such petitioners. The administrative law judge shall give each such petitioner as well as the parties, written notice of the decision on his or her petition. For each petition granted, the administrative law judge shall provide a brief statement of the basis of the decision. If the petition is denied, he or she shall briefly state the grounds for denial and shall then treat the petition as a request for participation as amicus curiae.
#### § 1917.19 Movement of barges and railcars.

Barges and railcars shall not be moved by cargo runners (running rigging) from vessel cargo booms, cranes or other equipment not suitable for the purpose.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO                                                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection  with the Quarterly
 Report on Form 10-Q of Capital Bank  Corporation  (the  Company) for the period ended
September 30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date
hereof (the  Report),  I, Richard W.  Edwards,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
 certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that: (1)
The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Richard W. Edwards

Richard W. Edwards
Chief Financial Officer
October 28, 2004 This Certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  § 1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed
 filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended,  and shall not be  incorporated  by reference  into any filing of the
Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities  Exchange Act of
1934, as amended,  whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of
any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed  original of this written
 statement  required by Section 906 has been  provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request -37-
#### PIERCE OIL CORPORATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. 45442]

[102 C. Cls. 360 ; 325 U. S. 865]

Income tax; finality of compromise settlement;, excess interest under section 821 of Revenue Act of 1938; legislative '¡history of section 821; intent of Congress.

Plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari was *denied*by the Supreme Court May 28, 1945.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.61 Retention of DOT markings, placards and labels.

Note:

The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1201 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-1910.1201).

[[61 FR 31432](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31432), June 20, 1996]
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Student Advantage,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Raymond V. Sozzi, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 14, 2002            /s/ Raymond V. Sozzi, Jr.
                                   -------------------------------------
                                   Raymond V. Sozzi, Jr.
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer




               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Student Advantage,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Sevim Perry, Vice President Finance and Assistant Treasurer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 14, 2002           /s/ Sevim M. Perry
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Sevim M. Perry
                                  Vice President Finance and Assistant Treasurer



                                       31
§ 1952.22 Puerto Rico. ( a ) The Puerto Rico State plan received initial approval on August 30, 1977.
( b ) OSHA entered into an operational status agreement with Puerto Rico.
( c ) The plan covers all private-sector employers and employees, with several notable exceptions, as well as State and local government employers and employees, within the State. For current information on these exceptions and for additional details about the plan, please visit *http://www.osha.gov/dcsp/osp/stateprogs/puerto_rico.html .*
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of

HORIZON BANCORPORATION, INC.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc., hereby certifies that:

1. Horizon Bancorporation, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc.

/S/ Charles S. Conoley
Charles S. Conoley
President and Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         152,770
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               234,192
<PP&E>                                       2,172,569
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,277,339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,388,175
<BONDS>                                        842,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       126,188
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,920,976
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,277,339
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,889,141
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,971,056
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,969,840
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             308,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,313,545)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,313,545)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,313,545)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
(76 South. 999)

#### BARNES v. STATE.

(2 Div. 160.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 26, 1917.)

Appeal from Law and Equity Court, Marengo County; E. J. Gilder, Judge.

W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.