alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.18 to 2008 10-K**

**AMENDMENT TO**

**CONVERGYS CORPORATION RETIREMENT AND SAVINGS PLAN**

**(EGTRRA RESTATEMENT)**

The ConvergysCorporation Retirement and Savings Plan is hereby amended effective as provided below in the following respects: 

1. Effective as ofApril 1, 2008, the first sentence of Section 5.2 of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 

For each payroll period beginning onor after April 1, 2008, the Participating Companies shall contribute to the Plan for each eligible Participant who (a) has satisfied the eligibility requirements for Employer Contributions under Sections 4.1 and 4.2, and (b) whoauthorized salary deferral contributions under Section 5.1 for a pay period, an amount equal to 100% of the first five percent of Covered Compensation with respect to which salary deferral contributions were authorized for the pay period.

2. Effective as of April 1, 2008, a new paragraph is added to the end of Section 6.9 to read as follows: 

Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 6.9, the Plan shall not satisfy the “safe harbor” requirements described inSection 401(k)(12) of the Code and this Section 6.9 for the 2008 Plan Year. The limitations on salary deferral contributions of Highly Compensated Employees described in Section 6.2 and the limitations on employer contributions ofHighly Compensated Employees described in Section 6.3 shall apply for the 2008 Plan Year. The Employer shall provide each eligible employee with a notice describing (i) the consequences of the change in the matching contribution formulafor the 2008 Plan Year, including that the change discontinues the “safe harbor” for the 2008 Plan Year, (ii) procedures for changing salary deferral contributions under the Plan, and (iii) the effective date of the change. Suchnotice shall be provided (and, for purposes of documentation, has been provided) prior to March 1, 2008. 

3. Effective as ofMarch 1, 2008, the first sentence of Section 7.5 is amended to read as follows: 

Before each annual or special meeting of theshareholders of Convergys, the Trustee shall provide or cause to be provided to each Participant, in the manner used to provide information to other shareholders of Convergys, proxy solicitation materials provided to shareholders of Convergys,together with a form requesting confidential instructions to the Trustee on how to vote the number of Convergys Shares credited to the Participant’s Plan Accounts. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Convergys Corporation has hereunto caused its name to be subscribed this 31st day ofMarch, 2008. 

 
CONVERGYS CORPORATIONBy: /s/ David F. DoughertyTitle: Chief Executive Officer
No. 84982 

ELIZABETH A. BROWN 

CLERK F S PRUE COURT 

BY 

JUL 2 1 2022 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

SHANNA MARIE BALTAR, D.O.; AND 

MIRIAM SITHOLE, APRN, 

Petitioners, 

vs. 

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF 

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE TARA 

D. CLARK NEWBERRY, DISTRIC'T 

JUDGE, 

Respondents, 

and 

BARRY HEIFETZ, INDIVIDUALLY; 

AND SPRING VALLEY HEALTHCARE, 

LLC, A FOREIGN LIMITED-LIABILITY 

COMPANY, D/B/A SPANISH HILLS 

WELLNESS SUITES, 

Real Parties in Interest. 

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

Petitioners on July 20, 2022, filed a notice of withdrawal of 

appeal, which is construed as a motion for voluntary dismissal of this matter 

under NRAP 42(b). The motion is granted, and this writ proceeding is 

dismissed. 

It is so ORDERED. 

cc: Hon. Tara D. Clark Newberry, District Judge 

John H. Cotton & Associates, Ltd.. 

Claggett & Sykes Law Firm 

McBride Hall 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPR EME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

I( )i I 947A
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Chew Wing, Appellant.

Argued March 23, 1937;

decided April 27, 1937.

*Jacob Shientag, Alvin I. Perlmutter, Maxwell Shapiro*and *Cornelius F. Collins, Jr.,*for appellant.

*William Copeland Dodge, District Attorney {Felix C. Benvenga*and *Philip A. Donahue*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
#### § 2570.60 Scope of rules.

The rules of practice set forth in this subpart are applicable to “502(c)(2) civil penalty proceedings” (as defined in § 2570.61(n) of this subpart) under section 502(c)(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The rules of procedure for administrative hearings published by the Department's Office of Law Judges at part 18 of this title will apply to matters arising under ERISA section 502(c)(2) except as modified by this section. These proceedings shall be conducted as expeditiously as possible, and the parties shall make every effort to avoid delay at each stage of the proceedings.
§ 2700.20 Notice of contest of a citation or order issued under section 104 of the Act. ( a ) *Who may contest.* ( 1 ) An operator may contest: ( i ) A citation or an order issued under section 104 of the Act, 30 U.S.C. 814;
( ii ) A modification of a citation or an order issued under section 104 of the Act; and
( iii ) The reasonableness of the length of time fixed for abatement in a citation or modification thereof issued under section 104 of the Act.
( 2 ) A miner or representative of miners may contest: ( i ) The issuance, modification or termination of any order issued under section 104 of the Act; and
( ii ) The reasonableness of the length of time fixed for abatement in a citation or modification thereof issued under section 104 of the Act.
( b ) *Time to contest.* Contests filed by an operator pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be filed with the Secretary at the appropriate Regional Solicitor's Office or at the Solicitor's Office, Mine Safety and Health Division, Arlington, Virginia, within 30 days of receipt by the operator of the contested citation, order, or modification. Contests filed by a miner or representative of miners pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be filed in the same manner within 30 days of receipt by the miner or representative of miners of the contested order, modification, or termination.
( c ) *Notification by the Secretary.* The Secretary, in accordance with section 105(d) of the Act, 30 U.S.C. 815(d), shall immediately advise the Commission of such notice of contest upon its receipt.
( d ) *Copy to Commission.* The contesting party shall also file a copy of his notice of contest with the Commission at the time he files with the Secretary.
( e ) *Contents of notice of contest.* ( 1 ) A notice of contest shall contain a short and plain statement of: ( i ) The party's position with respect to each issue of law and fact that the party contends is pertinent; and
( ii ) The relief requested by the party.
( 2 ) A legible copy of the contested citation or order shall be attached to the notice of contest. If a legible copy is not available, the notice of contest shall set forth the text of the contested citation or order.
( f ) *Answer.* Within 20 days after service of a notice of contest, the Secretary shall file an answer responding to each allegation of the notice of contest.
#### WILLIAMS v STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 86-013 AC

Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Appellate Division, Dade County

January 28, 1987

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Howard Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Mark J. Berkowitz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SIMONS, KAYE, DONNER, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the denial of the Defendant’s Motion to Suppress. We reverse based upon the authority of *State v. Jones,*483 So.2d 433 (Fla. 1986).

*164The State failed to meet its burden under the *Jones*case and presented no evidence for the court to consider in determining the constitutionality of the roadblock.

Reversed and remanded.
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Grand Chamber)

of 29 June 2004

in Case C-486/01 P: Front National v European Parliament (1)

(Appeal - Statement of formation of a group within the meaning of Rule 29(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament - Lack of political affinities - Retroactive dissolution of the TDI Group - Cross-appeal - Interpretation of the fourth paragraph of Article 230 EC - Meaning of decision of ‘direct and individual’ concern to a natural or legal person - Inadmissibility of action brought by a national political party)

(2004/C 217/01)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-486/01 P: Front National, established at Saint-Cloud (France) (avocats: F. Wagner and V. de Poulpiquet de Brescanvel) — appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2001 in Joined Cases T-222/99, T-327/99 and T-329/99 Martinez and Others v Parliament [2001] ECR II-2823, seeking to have that judgment set aside, the other party to the proceedings being: European Parliament (Agents: G. Garzón Clariana, J. Schoo and H. Krück) — the Court (Grand Chamber), composed of: V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans (Rapporteur), A. Rosas, J.-P. Puissochet and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Presidents of Chambers), R. Schintgen, F. Macken, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr and R. Silva de Lapuerta, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; M. Múgica Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 29 June 2004, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 84 of 6.4.2002.

----
EXHIBIT 23
                                                                      ----------


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
2-89135, 33-28533 and 333-15377 of North American Galvanizing & Coatings, Inc.
(formerly Kinark Corporation) on Forms S-8 and No. 333-61393 on Form S-3 of our
report dated February 10, 2006 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
North American Galvanizing & Coatings, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2005.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma
February 10, 2006
Argued March 18;

affirmed April 21, 1931

#### HEINRICH *v.*SPENCE

(297 P. 1118)

*B. A. Kliks,*of McMinnville (N. Gr. Anderson, of Portland, on the brief), for appellant.

*Walter L. Toose, Jr.,*of Portland, and *B. L. Conner,*of McMinnville (Vinton & Tooze, of Portland, and R. L. Conner, of McMinnville, on the brief), for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Irene Heinrich, nine years of age, was struck and severely injured by an automobile owned and operated by defendant. The record discloses a case of flagrant negligence on the part of the driver whose car skidded about sixty feet on dry concrete. pavement before it hit the little girl. She was crossing the pavement during the noon hour to go to school. Apparently no attention was. paid to school caution signs. The verdict of the jury in favor of plaintiff, for $2,113.50 was, indeed, very reasonable. Defendant had a fair trial and should have been satisfied.

Finding no errors which would warrant a reversal, it -follows that the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS LEGEND  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COYOTE NETWORK SYSTEMS, INC. AS OF AND FOR
THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                 1225
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         12292
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                            2130
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      22337
<PP&E>                                                10072
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (1880)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        41028
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 22996
<BONDS>                                                1534
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                            7255
<COMMON>                                              11167
<OTHER-SE>                                           (12365)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          41028
<SALES>                                               43318
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      43318
<CGS>                                                 28748
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         28748
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      26950
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     1893
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (13843)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (13843)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         (900)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (14743)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (1.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (1.50)


</TABLE>
[No. 20688-2-III.

Division Three.

October 22, 2002.]

#### Hackney, March & Carroll, *Plaintiff,*v. Peter Smilde, *Defendant.*Russell Jones, *Appellant,*v. Seattle First National Bank, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 97-2-06956-9, Salvatore F. Cozza, J., entered November 2, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, J., concurred in by Kato, A.C.J., and Sweeney, J.
Exhibit
32.1  Section 1350 Certification





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens First Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Mary D.
Cohron, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
            /s/Mary D. CohronMary
      D. CohronChief
      Executive OfficerDate:
            August
      14, 2008





This
certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed ‘filed” for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability
of that section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section.
Forwarded by Bob Boethling/DC/USEPA/US on 08/23/2012 04:15 PM

-----

From: Bob Boethling/DC/USEPA/US

To: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Chuantung Lin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Kathryn Schechter/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/27/2012 10:55 PM Subject: Re: HPV 2 P/C Data received from Vertellus to satisfy req of test rule for CASRN 68187

- 84

- 8.

I reviewed the biodegradation study (OECD 301D method) submitted for this substance. The test was correctly run and the results ar e deemed reliable. The substance was partially degraded and did not meet the ready biodegradability pass criterion. Given the substance, this surprises me, but there's nothing more I can say to refute the data. Perhaps the oxidation (it's "castor oil, o xidized ") oxidizes the double bonds to epoxides and this would, if anything, be expected to impart some resistance to biodegradation.

Robert Boethling, PhD
Exposure Assessment Branch

US EPA, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW (7406M)
Washington, DC 20460

202

- 564

- 8533 (P)

202

- 564

- 8892 (F)
#### § 2704.305 Settlement.

In the event that counsel for the Secretary and an applicant agree to settle an EAJA claim after an application has been filed with the Commission, the applicant shall timely notify the Commission of the settlement and request dismissal of the application.

[63 FR 63177, Nov. 12, 1998]
#### §§ 2706.152-2706.159 [Reserved]
SERVED : DECEMBE R15 , 201 0 U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C
INTH EMATTE RO F MAR Y WOOTE N FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP09EA001 0 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) FDM S NO
. FAA-2009-007 7 

### APARTMEN TO F •Ai^SPORWIO N .A^c TOPERAriO^{ S m 'i Tl b AS:3 5

ORDE RO FCHIE FADMINISTRATIV ELA WJUDG E

CORRECTIN GTRANSCRIP T Th e followin g correction s ar e hereb y mad e i nth e transcrip t o f th e Prehearin g Telephon e Conferenc e hel dNovembe r 19 , 2010 : PAG ELIN EREAD S SHOUL D REA D 3 1 5 2 2 2 5 2 8 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 6 3 7 3 8 5

2 3 5 7 4 8 2 2 1 4 6 10,1 8 3 matte r

lef t i t can I f you'r e tryin g t o convinc e me . there' s alway s Liability matte r interfer e matte r . . . matte r Judg e Bankhea d Pardo nme , Matte r righ t inten t It strike s me . that' s goin g t o rais e Leve l of penalt y Matte r interfere d Matte r . . . Matte r Judg e Benki n I' mtalkin g t o-mmmmmmi m 

## 1 4 0 1 6 4 1 8 4 2 1 1
S O ORDERED
. tha

t in amoun t solving penalt

y 

# '^ISO y ^7"—-<.\v_yL' ' 

### "Rl^mi e A
. Yode r y ^ Chief Administrativ e La>/Ju^g e at
amoun t o f penalt y settlin g

Attachment-Servic e Lis t



# yFAA Docke t No
. CP09EA00I 0 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA LAN D ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Robert H
. Waldman , Respondent' s Counse l 11 3 Ridgle y Ave
. Annapolis , M D 2140 1 TEL : 410-268-505 0 FAX : 410-269-154 4 Mary Wooten , Responden t 385 1 Ol dSolomon s Islan dRoa d Harwood , M D 2077 6 Christia nL
. Lewerenz , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , EAL- 7 EasternRegio n Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 1 Aviatio n Plaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-327 3 FAX : 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e Roimi e A
. Yoder , Chie f Administrativ e La w Judg e U.S
. Departmen t

of Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mE12-32 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-214 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo r servic e inperso no r

b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa l Aviatio n Administration , 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 , Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
. -3 -
EXHIBIT 32.2
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Jupiter Marine International
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 28, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Lawrence Tierney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date:  November 8, 2007

/s/ Lawrence Tierney
--------------------
Lawrence Tierney
Chief Financial Officer
§ 2590.716-2 Applicability. ( a ) *In general.* ( 1 ) The requirements in §§ 2590.716-4 through 2590.716-7, 2590.717-1, 2590.722, and 2590.725-1 through 2590.725-4 apply to group health plans and health insurance issuers offering group health insurance coverage (including grandfathered health plans as defined in § 2590.715-1251), except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
( 2 ) The requirements in §§ 2590.716-8 and 2590.717-2 apply to certified IDR entities and group health plans and health insurance issuers offering group health insurance coverage (including grandfathered health plans as defined in § 2590.715-1251) except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Exceptions.* The requirements in §§ 2590.716-4 through 2590.716-8, 2590.717-1, 2590.717-2, 2590.722, and 2590.725-1 through 2590.725-4 do not apply to the following: ( 1 ) Excepted benefits as described in § 2590.732.
( 2 ) Short-term, limited-duration insurance as defined in § 2590.701-2.
( 3 ) Health reimbursement arrangements or other account-based group health plans as described in § 2590.715-2711(d).
[86 FR 36959, July 13, 2021, as amended at 86 FR 66699, Nov. 23, 2021]
792 A.2d 590

#### In the Matter of Michael L. BRINT. Petition for reinstatement.

Nos. 346 Disciplinary Docket No. 1, 55 DB 1982.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Feb. 14, 2002.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2002, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 19, 2001, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.