alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                              Exhibit 23.02

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated January 27, 1999 (except with respect to the
matters discussed in the eighth and ninth paragraphs of Note 3, as to which the
date is February 12, 1999, and Note 16, as to which the date is March 11, 1999)
included in this Form 10-K, into Louisville Gas and Electric Company's
previously filed Registration Statement No.
33-13427.


                                          /S/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                          -----------------------
                                          Arthur Andersen LLP

Louisville, Kentucky
March 26, 1999
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MARKEE DESHAWN FELTON
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 1190

[ April 9, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; Sherwood Bauer , Judge; L.T. Case No.

4320 17000243CFJXMX

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Picard,

Assistant A ttorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER
, D AMOORGIAN and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I,
      Alexander Becker, President and Chief Executive Officer of Manas Petroleum
      Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)           the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September
      30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      November 14, 2007








/s/
      Alexander
      Becker


Alexander
      Becker


Chief
      Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12941]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

ACTION: Notice of information collection to be submitted to OMB for 
review and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., the FDIC hereby gives notice that it 
plans to submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request 
for OMB review and approval of the information collection system 
described below.
    Type of Review: Renewal of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Notification of Changes in Insured Status.
    OMB Number: 3064-0124.
    Annual Burden:

Estimated annual number of respondents: 943.
Estimated time per response; \1/4\ hour.
Average annual burden hours: 236 hours.
    Expiration Date of OMB Clearance: June 30, 2000.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Washington, DC 20503.
    FDIC Contact: Tamara R. Manly, (202) 898-7453, Office of the 
Executive Secretary, Room F-4058, Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation, 550 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20429.
    Comments: Comments on this collection of information are welcome 
and should be submitted on or before June 22, 2000 to both the OMB 
reviewer and the FDIC contact listed above.

ADDRESSES: Information about this submission, including copies of the 
proposed collection of information, may be obtained by calling or 
writing the FDIC contact listed above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 12 U.S.C. 1818(q) requires an insured 
depository institution to provide the FDIC with a certification when it 
partially or completely assumes deposit liabilities from another 
insured depository institution.

    Dated: May 18, 2000.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-12941 Filed 5-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
#### *Samuel Decker, jun., *against*Joshua Hardin.

on certiorari.

Deceit in the transfer of a note (a)

THE case and reasons appear in the opinion of the Court. Wall argued for plaintiff.

(a)

 See *Snyder vs Findley, Coxe 48, 78. Lummis vs. Stratton, Pen. *245. Meeker vs. Potter, post 586. Byard vs. Holmes, 5 Vr. 296.*

Kirkpatrick C. J.

This was an action on the case for a deceit. The deceit complained of, is, that the defendant, Decker, had become possessed of a certain note of hand, given by one *Jacob I. Decker*to *Joseph Sharp,*or order, for 7d dollars, payable in six months, with *interest;*that this note had been assigned by *Sharp*to one *Inglis, to be recovered at hds own risk,*but had not been assigned by *Inglis,*either to the said defendant or to any other person ; that the said defendant, *Decker,*purchased a yoke of oxen of the said plaintiff, *Hardin,*and gave him this note in payment, by merely handing it over to him without endorsement, averring at the same time, that it was a good and valuable note, and that *Sharp*was an endorser thereupon, and was answerable for the payment of the money ; that the plaintiff being altogether unable to read writing, and giving full faith and credit to the averments of the defendant, accepted the said note in payment for the said oxen, as a good and valuable note, *secured by the endorsement of said Sharp,*whereas the same was not good and valuable, *nor secured by such endorsement;*and so, that the said defendant wilfully and designedly deceived him &c. to his damage &c.

*669Upon this state of demand, the jury found a verdict for the plaintiff for 79 dollars, 84 cents, and judgment was entered accordingly.

The reasons assigned for the reversal of this judgment, are, 1. Because there is a variance between the summons and the state of demand filed; and 2. Because the state of demand itself is insufficient to support an action.

The first of these reasons is not true in fact; and the second, I think, is not true in law. One cannot, by falsehood and lies, deceive an illiterate man, impose upon him a writing for one thing, when it really is another, and then come into a court of justice and expect to receive the benefit of his fraud.

Therefore, in my opinion, this judgment must be affirmed.
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ #
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # !
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # "
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # #
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # $
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # %
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # &
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # '
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # (
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # )
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ #
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # !
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # "
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # #
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # $
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # %
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # &
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # '
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # (
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # ! )
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # !
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # ! !
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # ! "
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # ! #
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # ! $
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # ! %
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # ! &
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # ! '
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # ! (
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # " )
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # "
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # " !
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # " "
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # " #
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # " $
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # " %
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # " &
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # " '
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # " (
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # # )
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # #
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # # !
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # # "
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # # #
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # # $
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # # %
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # # &
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # # '
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # # (
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # $ )
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # $

1 ( + )'3( 1 ( 5 0 5 6 5 7 8 ( 3 6
! "# $ & ' ( )* + , - . (/ 0( 1 2 ( 3 4 - $ # $ !

9 ( : ;< =( > ? & @ A > B > ? @ C D E B > A E F B @ G @ B B H E H ? ? > B D

D I J ? H E D E I ? & K L # K H B M . @ A J > ? > ? . ? @ C D E & F

H N F . . D F H M & ? H H O I D . @ D P P > . @ ? G D E > N H
----

ORDER OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 27 May 2004

in Case C-517/03: IAMA Consulting Srl v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Arbitration clause - Action before the Court of First Instance - Counterclaim - Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice)

(2004/C 228/35)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-517/03: IAMA Consulting Srl, established in Milan (Italy) (lawyer: V. Salvatore) v Commission of the European Communities (Agent: E. de March, assisted by A. Dal Ferro) — Counterclaim submitted by the Commission of the European Communities to the Court of First Instance of the European Communities seeking repayment of financial assistance paid in the context of the REGIS 22337 and Refiag 23200 projects, the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, J. N. Cunha Rodrigues, K. Schiemann (Rapporteur), M. Ilešic et E. Levits, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an Order on 27 May 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

----

(1)OJ C 47 of 21.2.2004.

----
S. Con. Res. 71 Agreed to March 14, 2008

One Hundred Tenth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE CAPITOL FOR THE PRESENTATION OF THE CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL. 

The rotunda of the United States Capitol is authorized to 

be used on April 23, 2008, for the presentation of the Congressional 

Gold Medal to Michael Ellis DeBakey, M.D.. Physical preparations 

for the conduct of the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance 

with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of 

the Capitol. 

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
#### Clara R. Brahdy, Appellant, *v.*Board of Education of the City of New York, Respondent.

Submitted October 1, 1937;

decided October 19, 1937.

*609
      *Herman E. Cooper*for appellant.

*Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel (Paxton Blair*and *Arthur Bainbridge Hoff*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
#### § 32.16 Listing of employment openings.

Recipients should request State employment security agencies to refer qualified handicapped individuals for consideration for employment.
§ 36.310 Recruitment. ( a ) *Nondiscriminatory recruitment.* A recipient to which §§ 36.300 through 36.310 apply shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in the recruitment and admission of students. A recipient may be required to undertake additional recruitment efforts for one sex as remedial action pursuant to § 36.110(a), and may choose to undertake such efforts as affirmative action pursuant to § 36.110(b).
( b ) *Recruitment at certain institutions.* A recipient to which §§ 36.300 through 36.310 apply shall not recruit primarily or exclusively at educational institutions, schools, or entities that admit as students only or predominantly members of one sex, if such actions have the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 36.300 through 36.310.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 16-0228

Filed December 21, 2016

IN THE INTEREST OF T.D.,

T.D., Minor child,

Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Benton County, Russell G. Keast 

(adjudicatory hearing), District Associate Judge, and Susan F. Flaherty 

(dispositional hearing), Associate Juvenile Judge.

A child appeals the district court’s adjudication and disposition of 

delinquency. AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED. 

Peter W. Stiefel of Stiefel Law Firm, Victor, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Mary A. Triick, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee State.

Considered by Vogel, P.J., and Vaitheswaran and McDonald, JJ.
2

VOGEL, Presiding Judge.

T.D. appeals following the district court’s dispositional order adjudicating 

him delinquent and imposing formal probation.

1

 The district court determined he 

committed sexual abuse in the third degree, in violation of Iowa Code section 

709.4(1)(a) (2015); assault with the intent to commit sexual abuse, in violation of

section 709.11(3); and simple assault, in violation of sections 708.1 and 708.2(6). 

T.D. challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conclusion he 

committed the crimes in question and the court’s failure to grant him a consent 

decree. We affirm the adjudication and disposition under Iowa Court Rule

21.26(1)(a), (b), and (d) but remand for the entry of a corrected dispositional 

order. 

The district court heard evidence T.D. committed certain acts upon three 

separate victims. It then weighed the evidence and made credibility findings 

before entering its lengthy and detailed ruling. We review delinquency 

proceedings de novo, giving weight to the fact findings of the district court, 

especially as to the credibility of the witnesses, but we are not bound by those 

findings. In re A.K., 825 N.W.2d 46, 49 (Iowa 2013). Upon our de novo review, 

we agree with the district court’s reasoning and conclusions. 

We further find no abuse of the district court’s discretion in its dispositional

decision declining T.D.’s request for a consent decree. See In re J.J.A., 580 

N.W.2d 731, 737 (Iowa 1998) (“Our review of a juvenile court’s decision to enter 

 

1 After the adjudicatory hearing, the district court found the State had proven T.D. had 

committed the above referenced acts but withheld the entry of adjudication “pending 

dispositional hearing.” 
3

a consent decree is de novo, but only to the extent of examining all the evidence 

to determine whether the juvenile court abused its discretion.”).

However, we vacate that portion of the dispositional order that incorrectly 

cited Iowa Code section 708.2(2), assault causing bodily injury, because this

does not comport with the evidentiary findings of the court. The court found T.D. 

had committed simple assault under Iowa Code sections 708.1 and 708.2(6). 

The State concedes this error. We therefore remand this matter for the entry of a 

corrected dispositional order.

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
# Az Európai Unió C 205A/2004

| | ISSN 1725-518X |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 205A |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 47. évfolyam2004. augusztus 13. |

ISSN 1725-518X

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 205A

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

47. évfolyam2004. augusztus 13.

---

| Közleményszám | Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Közlemények |
| | Intelligens Energia Igazgatóság |
| 2004/C 205A/1 | Pályázati felhívás | 1 |

Közleményszám

Tartalom

Oldal

III   Közlemények

Intelligens Energia Igazgatóság

2004/C 205A/1

Pályázati felhívás

1

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

III Közlemények

Intelligens Energia Igazgatóság

| 13.8.2004 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CA 205/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2004

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CA 205/1

---

PÁLYÁZATI FELHÍVÁS

(2004/C 205 A/01)

Az Intelligens Energia Igazgatóság jelentkezőket keres üres pozíciókra. A betöltendő állásokra vonatkozó részletes információkhoz az ügynökség képviseletén lehet hozzájutni. A pályázat kitöltésére vonatkozó feltételeket az ügynökség internetoldalán, a következő cím alatt lehet megtalálni: http://europa.eu.int/comm/energy/intelligent/index_en.html.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CONTINENTAL BEVERAGE AND NUTRITION, INC.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Continental Beverage and Nutrition,
Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB of the period ended May 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David
Sackler, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the
quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the
quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: July 15, 2005

/s/ DAVID SACKLER
---------------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Joseph Crauta, Appellant.

Submitted October 6, 1937;

decided October 19, 1937.

*Marks Wolff*for appellant.

*William Copeland Dodge, District Attorney (LeRoy Mandle*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
§ 4007.12 Liability for single-employer premiums. ( a ) The designation under this part of the plan administrator as the person required to make flat-rate and variable-rate premium filings and payments under this part for a single-employer plan is a procedural requirement only and does not alter the liability for premium payments imposed by section 4007 of ERISA. Pursuant to section 4007(e) of ERISA, both the plan administrator and the contributing sponsor of a single-employer plan are liable for flat-rate and variable-rate premium payments, and, if the contributing sponsor is a member of a controlled group, each member of the controlled group is jointly and severally liable for the required premiums. Any entity that is liable for required premiums is also liable for any interest and penalties assessed with respect to such premiums.
( b ) After a plan administrator issues (pursuant to section 4041(a)(2) of ERISA) the first notice of intent to terminate in a distress termination under section 4041(c) of ERISA or PBGC issues a notice of determination under section 4042(a) of ERISA, the obligation to pay the premiums (and any interest or penalties thereon) imposed by ERISA and this part for a single-employer plan shall be an obligation solely of the contributing sponsor and the members of its controlled group, if any.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1212-0009) [61 FR 34020, July 1, 1996, as amended at 72 FR 71229, Dec. 17, 2007; 79 FR 13562, Mar. 11, 2014]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App. 1, Sec. 10), that the Acadia National Park Advisory Commission will hold a meeting on Monday, June 5, 2000. 

The Commission was established pursuant to Public Law 99-420, Sec. 103. The purpose of the commission is to consult with the Secretary of the Interior, or his designee, on matters relating to the management and development of the park, including but not limited to the acquisition of lands and interests in lands (including conservation easements on islands) and termination of rights of use and occupancy. 

The meeting will convene at park Headquarters, McFarland Hill, Bar Harbor, Maine, at 1 p.m. to consider the following agenda: 

1. Review and approval of minutes from the meeting held February 7, 2000 

2. Committee reports 

Land Conservation—Proposed conservation easements: 

A. Gray property, Fernald Point, Southwest Harbor, ME 

B. Herter property, West Point, Pretty Marsh, Mt. Desert, ME 

Park Use 

Science 

3. Old business 

4. Superintendent's report 

5. Public comments 

6. Proposed agenda for next Commission meeting, September 11, 2000. 

The meeting is open to the public. Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be made to the Superintendent at least seven days prior to the meeting. 

Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from the Superintendent, Acadia National Park, P.O. Box 177, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609; tel: (207) 288-3338. 

Dated: May 12, 2000. 

Len Bobinchock,

Acting Superintendent, Acadia National Park. 

[FR Doc. 00-12997 Filed 5-23-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
#### § 2204.407 Commission review.

Either the applicant or the Secretary may seek review of the judge's decision on the fee application, and the Commission may grant such a petition for review or direct review of the decision on the Commission's own initiative. Review by the Commission shall be in accordance with §§ 2200.91 and 2200.92 of this chapter.