# EMISSIONS TEST REPORT

BIG BEND STATION FACILITY ID NUMBER: 0570039 EMISSION UNIT ID NO: -001 BOILER NO. 1

PARTICULATE MATTER, SULFUR DIOXIDE, AND, VISIBLE EMISSIONS EVALUATION

March 12, 2008

Prepared For: Tampa Electric Company

Big Bend Power Station P.O. Box 111 Tampa, Florida 33601-0111

Prepared By: Tampa Electric Company Environmental, Health, & Safety Air Services Group

Environmental, Health, & Safety Air Services Group 5010 Causeway Boulevard Tampa, Florida 33619- 6130

## REPORT CERTIFICATION

The sampling and subseque nt data entry/reduction detailed in this report was conducted at my direction, and I here by certify that this test report is authentic and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

Signature:__________________________ Jorge A. Varino Environmental Technician Test Team Lead Air Services Group Environmental Health & Safety Tampa Electric Company

I have reviewed the test performa nce, associated quality assurance activities, the resultant calculations, and the contents of this report, and certify that all project quality obj ectives have been met. Th is report is approved for submittal.

Signature:__________________________ Raymond A. McDarby, Jr. Senior Environmental Technician Quality Assurance/Quality Control Specialist Air Services Group Environmental Health & Safety Tampa Electric Company

I have reviewed the testing details and results submitted in this report, and hereby certify that this test report is authenti c and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

Signature:__________________________ David A. Smith Coordinator – Air Services Group

Environmental Health & Safety Tampa Electric Company

## TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE NO.
1.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 1
2.0 SOURCE DESCRIPTION/TEST PROCEDURES 3
3.0 TEST RESULTS
SOOT BLOWING PARTICULATE TEST SUMMARY 6
NON SOOT BLOWING PARTICULATE TEST SUMMARY 7
SULFUR DIOXIDE INFORMATION SUMMARY 8
OPACITY DATA SUMMARY 9
HEAT INPUT CALCULATIONS 11
4.0 FIGURES
FIGURE 1 SAMPLING LOCATION DIAGRAM 13
APPENDICES
A. PARTICULATE MATTER CALCULATIONS
B. PARTICULATE MATTER LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA
C. BOILER/PRECIPITATOR OPERATIONAL DATA
D. PLANT CEMS DAHS PRINTOUTS
E. FUEL ANALYSIS
F. FIELD DATA SHEETS
G. SAMPLING EQUIPMENT CALIBRATIONS
H. CHAIN OF CUSTODY
I. TEST PARTICIPANTS

## 1.0 INTRODUCTION
On March 12, 2008, Tampa Electric Company’s Envi ronmental Services, Air Services Group, performed source emission tests at the Big B end Station, Boiler No. 1, emissions unit I.D.# 0570039-001. Testing was conducted according to procedures stipulated by t he Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for fossil fuel steam generators, and requirements in Title V Permit #
0570039-021-AV.

1

## 2.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

The particulate matter emission rate under soot blowing conditions was derived by performing three United States En vironmental Protec tion Agency (USEPA)
Reference Method 5-B test runs. The av erage of the three test runs was 0.03 lb/mmBtu. The FDEP permitted emission ra te under soot blowing conditions is
0.03 lb/mmBtu.

The particulate matter emission rate under non-soot blowing conditions was derived by performing three USEPA Refe rence Method 5-B test runs. The average of the three test runs wa s 0.03 lb/mmBtu. The FDEP permitted
emission rate under non-soot blowi ng conditions is 0.03 lb/mmBtu.

The Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 

### ) emission rate was determined using data provided by the Continuous Emissions Monitoring Syst em’s (CEMS), Data Acquisition and Handing System (DAHS). The average emission rate for the test period was determined to be 0.1 lb/mmBtu, and 311 lb s/hr. The FDEP a llowable emission
rate is 6.5 lbs/mmBtu based on a two hour average, and 3310 lbs/hr based on scenario 3 as listed in condition A.9 of the permit.

Visible emissions were evaluated using a United Sciences, Incorporated, Model 500C transmissometer (S/N 5001688), duri ng both soot blowing and non-soot blowing testing. The 1-hour average opac ity under soot blowing conditions was 15.4%. The 1-hour average opacity under non-soot blowing conditions was
16.0%. The FDEP allowable emissi on rate is 20 percent opacity.

During the test performed on March 12, 2008, Boiler No. 1 was operated at an average heat input rate of 3976 mmBtu/hr and an average load of 381 megawatts. The average quantity of fuel burned was 153.9 tons per hour.

2

## 3.0 SOURCE DESCRIPTION/TEST PROCEDURES

Big Bend Station is located on Big Bend Road, Ruskin, Florida at UTM
coordinates East 361.9 North 3075.0. The Boiler No. 1 particulate matter sampling location consists of a shared circ ular stack 29.83 feet in diameter with four sample ports located 90 degrees apart on the stack circumference. These ports are located downstr eam of the electrostatic precipitator and the FGD scrubber. The sampling ports were determined to be 8.77 diameters
downstream of the transition ductwork and 2.43 diameters upstream of the stack exit. Using these criteria, a total of 12 sampling points were chosen for particulate sampling as stipulated in t he USEPA Method 1 test procedure. During this test, Boiler No. 2 was not operating, and was isolated from the FGD module. A diagram of the stack sampling location is included in Figure 1 along with other pertinent information on the test site.

Boiler No. 1 is serviced by an electrostati c precipitator for the control of flyash emissions, and a flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system for control of sulfur
dioxide emissions.

During the test the boiler wa s fired with a solid fuel matrix comprised of 86.4% coal, 9.9% petroleum coke, and 3.8% residual.

Particulate sampling was perform ed according to USEPA Method 5B
"Determination of Nonsulfuric Acid Part iculate Matter from Stationary Sources"

Diluent gas sampling and analysis was performed according to USEPA Method 3 "Gas Analysis for Determination of Emissi on Rate Correction Factor, or Excess Air”. Gas analysis was performed on-site using an Orsat analyzer.

Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 

### ) and Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 

### ) data were provided by the Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS) , Data Acquisition and

3

### Handling System (DAHS). Averages were derived from the time frame of 7:28 through 16:49 on March 12, 2008. This data is included as Appendix B of this report.

Visible emissions were a ssessed using the installed Continuous Opacity Monitor (COM), and the CEMS DAHS.

4

## 4.0 TABULATED RESULTS

5

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

Customer: T ampa Electric Company Facility: Big Bend Station Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet Unit Under Test: Boiler #1 T est Date: March 12, 2008 Operating Conditions: Soot Blowing

Run 1s Run 2s Run 3s T est Average

V m(std) 

### , scf 35.5941 34.8993 34.0170 34.83680

B ws 

### , ratio 0.1347 0.1363 0.1377 0.13622

M

d 

### , lb/lb - mole 30.34 30.34 30.34 30.340

M

s 

### , lb/lb - mole 28.68 28.66 28.64 28.659

Q s 

### , acf/min 865541.86 849130.66 825702.59 846791.7

Q s(std) 

### , dscf/min 666779.02 653696.81 636612.44 652362.76

I, % 101.2 101.3 101.3 101.27

C, lbs/dscf 3.075E-06 2.145E-06 2.025E-06 2.415E-06

E M 

### , lbs/hr 123.0265 84.1153 77.3578 94.83323

E R 

### , lbs/MMBtu 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03



### 6

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

Customer: T ampa Electric Company Facility: Big Bend Station Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet Unit Under Test: Boiler #1 T est Date: March 12, 2008 Operating Conditions: Non-Soot Blowing

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 T est Average

V m(std) 

### , scf 35.0903 35.0194 34.3917 34.83382

B ws 

### , ratio 0.1339 0.1393 0.1386 0.13729

M

d 

### , lb/lb - mole 30.34 30.34 30.34 30.340

M

s 

### , lb/lb - mole 28.69 28.62 28.63 28.646

Q s 

### , acf/min 851013.36 855803.08 838132.86 848316.43

Q s(std) 

### , dscf/min 656554.49 657202.44 645976.39 653244.44

I, % 101.4 101.1 101 101.17

C, lbs/dscf 2.761E-06 2.351E-06 1.683E-06 2.265E-06

E M 

### , lbs/hr 108.7721 92.7164 65.2180 88.90216

E R 

### , lbs/MMBtu 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.03



### 7

## BIG BEND STATION SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA FROM CEMs

T est Period Information Start Time 7:28:00 Eastern Standard Time (EST) Stop Time 16:49:00 Eastern Standard Time (EST) T otal Time 9:21:00 Correspondin g to the time frame for the PM test.

Sulfur Dioxide Data: RM - 19 SO 2 

### CO 2 

### SO 2 

### SO 2 

### ppmvw %, wet lb/mmBtu lbs/hr 25.241495 9.814393 0.1 311

Calculation Details SO 2 

### , lb/mmBtu = SO 2 

### , ppmvw x C f 

### x F c 

### x (100 / CO2 %, wet)
where: C f



### = 1.6635E-07 (lb/scf)/ppm SO 2 

### F c



### = 1800 scf/mmBtu SO 2 

### , lbs/hr = SO 2 

### , lb/mmBtu x Heat Input, mmBtu/hr
where: Heat Input = 4032 mmBtu/hr, from Heat Input Calculation 

### Unit #1 WET-BOTTOM UTILITY BOILER March 12, 2008

CEM DATA

8

## BIG BEND STATION VISIBLE EMISSIONS DATA FROM OPACITY MONITO R

Record# DATE TIME OPACITY1 Record# DATE TIME OPACITY1 1 3/12/08 9:11 14.200 31 3/12/08 9:41 13.400 2 3/12/08 9:12 14.500 32 3/12/08 9:42 11.900 3 3/12/08 9:13 13.500 33 3/12/08 9:43 12.300 4 3/12/08 9:14 12.400 34 3/12/08 9:44 14.200 5 3/12/08 9:15 12.800 35 3/12/08 9:45 15.200 6 3/12/08 9:16 13.100 36 3/12/08 9:46 15.300 7 3/12/08 9:17 13.000 37 3/12/08 9:47 14.800 8 3/12/08 9:18 13.700 38 3/12/08 9:48 14.300 9 3/12/08 9:19 12.600 39 3/12/08 9:49 13.500 10 3/12/08 9:20 13.500 40 3/12/08 9:50 13.800 11 3/12/08 9:21 13.000 41 3/12/08 9:51 14.600 12 3/12/08 9:22 12.700 42 3/12/08 9:52 14.400 13 3/12/08 9:23 13.100 43 3/12/08 9:53 15.400 14 3/12/08 9:24 14.200 44 3/12/08 9:54 14.900 15 3/12/08 9:25 15.000 45 3/12/08 9:55 15.100 16 3/12/08 9:26 15.200 46 3/12/08 9:56 15.200 17 3/12/08 9:27 15.100 47 3/12/08 9:57 14.400 18 3/12/08 9:28 15.000 48 3/12/08 9:58 14.700 19 3/12/08 9:29 15.800 49 3/12/08 9:59 14.500 20 3/12/08 9:30 15.700 50 3/12/08 10:00 14.500 21 3/12/08 9:31 15.700 51 3/12/08 10:01 15.100 22 3/12/08 9:32 14.800 52 3/12/08 10:02 15.100 23 3/12/08 9:33 13.600 53 3/12/08 10:03 14.700 24 3/12/08 9:34 13.100 54 3/12/08 10:04 14.600 25 3/12/08 9:35 14.000 55 3/12/08 10:05 14.700 26 3/12/08 9:36 13.600 56 3/12/08 10:06 14.500 27 3/12/08 9:37 13.400 57 3/12/08 10:07 14.100 28 3/12/08 9:38 14.300 58 3/12/08 10:08 13.100 29 3/12/08 9:39 13.900 59 3/12/08 10:09 12.500 30 3/12/08 9:40 13.600 60 3/12/08 10:10 13.500

Test Average: 14.107 % Minimum One Minute Average: 11.900 % Maximum One Minute Average: 15.800 % Maximum Six Minute Average: 15.417 % 

### Unit #1 WET BOTTOM UTILITY BOILER

SOOTBLOWING CONDITIONS



### 9

## BIG BEND STATION VISIBLE EMISSIONS DATA FROM OPACITY MONITO R

Record# DATE TIME OPACITY1 Record# DATE TIME OPACITY1 1 3/12/08 11:15 12.100 31 3/12/08 11:45 15.100 2 3/12/08 11:16 12.800 32 3/12/08 11:46 14.100 3 3/12/08 11:17 12.900 33 3/12/08 11:47 13.300 4 3/12/08 11:18 13.700 34 3/12/08 11:48 13.400 5 3/12/08 11:19 14.100 35 3/12/08 11:49 13.400 6 3/12/08 11:20 15.500 36 3/12/08 11:50 13.500 7 3/12/08 11:21 15.300 37 3/12/08 11:51 13.300 8 3/12/08 11:22 15.500 38 3/12/08 11:52 13.600 9 3/12/08 11:23 15.100 39 3/12/08 11:53 14.900 10 3/12/08 11:24 16.500 40 3/12/08 11:54 16.900 11 3/12/08 11:25 17.000 41 3/12/08 11:55 15.900 12 3/12/08 11:26 15.800 42 3/12/08 11:56 16.700 13 3/12/08 11:27 15.700 43 3/12/08 11:57 17.000 14 3/12/08 11:28 13.800 44 3/12/08 11:58 14.600 15 3/12/08 11:29 14.600 45 3/12/08 11:59 14.200 16 3/12/08 11:30 15.200 46 3/12/08 12:00 14.700 17 3/12/08 11:31 13.800 47 3/12/08 12:01 14.900 18 3/12/08 11:32 14.400 48 3/12/08 12:02 14.900 19 3/12/08 11:33 13.700 49 3/12/08 12:03 14.500 20 3/12/08 11:34 12.800 50 3/12/08 12:04 14.200 21 3/12/08 11:35 13.500 51 3/12/08 12:05 14.600 22 3/12/08 11:36 14.100 52 3/12/08 12:06 15.000 23 3/12/08 11:37 14.100 53 3/12/08 12:07 14.100 24 3/12/08 11:38 13.900 54 3/12/08 12:08 14.700 25 3/12/08 11:39 15.000 55 3/12/08 12:09 15.300 26 3/12/08 11:40 15.300 56 3/12/08 12:10 14.700 27 3/12/08 11:41 14.600 57 3/12/08 12:11 15.300 28 3/12/08 11:42 15.300 58 3/12/08 12:12 14.700 29 3/12/08 11:43 15.700 59 3/12/08 12:13 15.100 30 3/12/08 11:44 15.200 60 3/12/08 12:14 16.700

Test Average: 14.672 % Minimum One Minute Average: 12.100 % Maximum One Minute Average: 17.000 % Maximum Six Minute Average: 16.000 % 

### Unit #1 WET BOTTOM UTILITY BOILER NON-SOOTBLOWING CONDITIONS



### 10

## BIG BEND GENERATING STATION HEAT INPUT CALCULATIONS

Gross Heat Rate, Previous Month (February): 10445 KMBtu/MWh 1.0445E+07 MMBtu/MWh

Me g aWatt Hour Inte g rator Information Initial Inte g rator Readin g : 177480 MWh

Final Inte g rator Readin g : 181089 MWh T otal: 3609 MWh

T est Time Information T estin g Start Time: 7:25

T estin g End Time: 16:54

T otal Test Time: 9.48 hours

Calculated Heat Input Avera g e Unit Load, MW = MWh / hours: 380.7 MW Heat Input, MMBtu/h = MMBtu/MWh x MW: 3976.4 mmBtu/hr

Fuel Consumption Calculation

Laboratory Sample ID: AA93556 Btu as received: 12923 Btu/lb T ons of Fuel Consumed, Tons/hr = (mmBtu/h / Btu/lb) x 500: 153.9 T ons/hour Unit #1

March 12, 2008 WET-BOTTOM UTILTIY BOILE R



### 11

## 5.0 FIGURES

12FIGURE 1 EXHAUST STACK 426.5 ’ EL. BIG BEND GENERATING STATION

BOILERS 1 and 2 PARTICULATE TRAVERSE POINTS

OUTLET 

# N

PORT LOCATION PLAN

REVISED 1-18-00 COMMON STACK1 - WET TEST LOCATION

STACK DIAMETERS DOWNSTREAM FROM DISTURBANCE = 8.77

STACK DIAMETERS UPSTREAM FROM DISTURBANCE = 2.43

STACK DIAMETER = 29.8333 FT. ID. STACK AREA = 699.0246 SQ. FT.

PORT LENGTH’S = 62 IN. TRAVERSE POINT

1

2

3 % OF STACK DIAMETER IN. FROM STACK WALL

4.4%

14.6%

29.6% 15.75 IN.

52.26 IN.

105.96 IN. 499 ’ EL.

165 ’ EL. 261.5 ’

FGD

PRESSURIZED ANNULUS 72.5 ’



### A

B C D

9 ’ EL.



### 13

## APPENDIX A

PARTICULATE MATTER CALCULATIONS

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods Reference Method 5/17 Particulate Test Calculations

Customer: Tampa Electric Company Facility: Big Bend Station Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet Unit Under Test: Boiler #1 Operating Conditions: Soot Blowing Run Number: 1s Date: 03/12/08

Sample Time, θ : 60 minutes Nozzle Diameter, D n : 0.270 inches Barometric Pressure, P b : 29.65 "Hg Nozzle Area, A n : 0.000398 ft 2 Stack Pressure, P s : 29.63 "Hg Average Orifice Meter, Δ H: 1.132 "H 2 O Effective Stack Area, A s : 452.389 ft 2 Sample Volume, V m : 36.337 ft 3 Pitot Coefficient, Cp: 0.84 dimensionless Average Meter Temp., T m : 70.8 o F Gas Analysis: 13.0 % CO 2 Average Stack Temp., T s : 127.3 o F 6.5 % O 2 Average √ Δ p: 0.534 "H 2 O 0.0 % CO Condensate Volume, V lc : 117.7 ml 80.5 % N 2 Meter Box Y: 0.991 dimensionless F-factor, F d , for fuel: 9780 dscf/MMBtu

Data Calculated from Source Measurements: V w ( std ) = 4.707E-02 x V lc 5.540 scf V m ( std ) = 17.647 x V m x Y x (P b + ( Δ H / 13.6)) / (T m +460) 35.594 dscf B w s = V w ( std ) / (V m ( std ) + V w ( std ) ) 0.135 % FDA = 1.0 - B w s 0.865 % M d = (0.44 x %CO 2 ) + (0.32 x %O 2 ) + (0.28 x (%N 2 + % CO)) 30.34 lb./lb. mole M s = (M d x FDA) + (18.0 x B w s ) 28.68 lb./lb. mole

v s = 85.49 x C p x ( √Δ p) x ( √ (T s + 460) / (M s x P s )) 31.89 ft/second Q s = v s x A s x 60 865541.9 acf/minute Q s ( std ) = Q s x FDA x (528 / (T s + 460)) x (P s / 29.92)) 666779.0 dscf/minute I = (T s + 460) x ((2.67E-03 x V lc ) + (V m(std) / 17.647)) x 100 / ( θ x P s x A n x v s x 60) 101.2 %

Data from Laboratory Analysis: Total Particulate Weight From Laboratory Analysis: 0.049650 grams

Calculated Concentration and Emission Rate Data:

c s = (15.432 x grams) / V m(std) 0.022 grains/dscf grains/acf = c s x 17.647 x P s x (FDA / (T s + 460) 0.017 grains/acf C = c s / 7000 3.075E-06 lbs/dscf E M = C x Q s(std) x 60 123.0 lbs/hr E R = C x F d x (20.9 /(20.9 - %O 2 ) 0.044 lbs/MMBtu

### Environmental, Health, & Safety Notes of Findings

Topic: Big Bend Unit # 1 Compliance Test Run Number 1s (chronological run #2) Apparent Failed Post-Test Leak Check
Test Data: 12-Mar-2008 (run time 9:11 – 10:20 EST)

Incident NotesDuring the post-test leak ch eck, the console operator wa s not able to establish a vacuum consistent with the vacuum read ings observed duri ng the test. The sampling system (Dry Gas Meter, nozzle, probe, filter assembly, and impingers) responded as though the system was open. It was believed at the time that the nozzle was bumped loose during the setup for the post-test le ak check. A leak rate for this test was unobtainable due to the severity of the leak itself. The nozzle was removed from the probe, and a second leak test was performed from the union of the nozzl e/probe through the remainde r of the system. This leak test rate was 0 cfm. The nozzle was reattached, and yet another leak check was performed. This third le ak check returned a leak rate of 0 cfm. Initial consultation with the ag ency observer indicated that the run would be acceptable, based on observations and explanation of the problem.
Data Objectives/Quality Assurance ReviewThe samples collected for this run (filter and nozzl e/probe wash) were retained and analyzed with the rest of the samples for this test. The field data sheet was reviewed for completeness, legibility, a ccuracy, project scope data criteria, and reasonableness. It was noted that during the test there was no indication of any breach in the sampling system as evid enced by the vacuum readings recorded during the run. The laboratory analysis was reviewed for appropriateness. The nozzle and probe wash weight for this pa rticular sample was approximately twice the mean of all the samples for this run, but fell with in two standard deviations of the mean. The filter weight was within 20 percent of the mean of all the filter weights in this test and well within two standard deviations of the mean. This sample also produced the heaviest tota l capture weight of this test cycle.
FindingsBased on the incident notes and subseq uent data objectives/quality assurance review, we recommend that this samp le be included in the compliance determination.
R.A.McDarby

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods Reference Method 5/17 Particulate Test Calculations

Customer: Tampa Electric Company Facility: Big Bend Station Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet Unit Under Test: Boiler #1 Operating Conditions: Soot Blowing Run Number: 2s Date: 03/12/08

Sample Time, θ : 60 minutes Nozzle Diameter, D n : 0.270 inches Barometric Pressure, P b : 29.65 "Hg Nozzle Area, A n : 0.000398 ft 2 Stack Pressure, P s : 29.63 "Hg Average Orifice Meter, Δ H: 1.103 "H 2 O Effective Stack Area, A s : 452.389 ft 2 Sample Volume, V m : 36.033 ft 3 Pitot Coefficient, Cp: 0.84 dimensionless Average Meter Temp., T m : 76.8 o F Gas Analysis: 13.0 % CO 2 Average Stack Temp., T s : 126.7 o F 6.5 % O 2 Average √ Δ p: 0.524 "H 2 O 0.0 % CO Condensate Volume, V lc : 117.0 ml 80.5 % N 2 Meter Box Y: 0.991 dimensionless F-factor, F d , for fuel: 9780 dscf/MMBtu

Data Calculated from Source Measurements: V w ( std ) = 4.707E-02 x V lc 5.507 scf V m ( std ) = 17.647 x V m x Y x (P b + ( Δ H / 13.6)) / (T m +460) 34.899 dscf B w s = V w ( std ) / (V m ( std ) + V w ( std ) ) 0.136 % FDA = 1.0 - B w s 0.864 % M d = (0.44 x %CO 2 ) + (0.32 x %O 2 ) + (0.28 x (%N 2 + % CO)) 30.34 lb./lb. mole M s = (M d x FDA) + (18.0 x B w s ) 28.66 lb./lb. mole

v s = 85.49 x C p x ( √Δ p) x ( √ (T s + 460) / (M s x P s )) 31.28 ft/second Q s = v s x A s x 60 849130.7 acf/minute Q s ( std ) = Q s x FDA x (528 / (T s + 460)) x (P s / 29.92)) 653696.8 dscf/minute I = (T s + 460) x ((2.67E-03 x V lc ) + (V m(std) / 17.647)) x 100 / ( θ x P s x A n x v s x 60) 101.3 %

Data from Laboratory Analysis: Total Particulate Weight From Laboratory Analysis: 0.033950 grams

Calculated Concentration and Emission Rate Data:

c s = (15.432 x grams) / V m(std) 0.015 grains/dscf grains/acf = c s x 17.647 x P s x (FDA / (T s + 460) 0.012 grains/acf C = c s / 7000 2.145E-06 lbs/dscf E M = C x Q s(std) x 60 84.1 lbs/hr E R = C x F d x (20.9 /(20.9 - %O 2 ) 0.030 lbs/MMBtu

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods Reference Method 5/17 Particulate Test Calculations

Customer: Tampa Electric Company Facility: Big Bend Station Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet Unit Under Test: Boiler #1 Operating Conditions: Soot Blowing Run Number: 3s Date: 03/12/08

Sample Time, θ : 60 minutes Nozzle Diameter, D n : 0.270 inches Barometric Pressure, P b : 29.67 "Hg Nozzle Area, A n : 0.000398 ft 2 Stack Pressure, P s : 29.65 "Hg Average Orifice Meter, Δ H: 1.043 "H 2 O Effective Stack Area, A s : 452.389 ft 2 Sample Volume, V m : 34.950 ft 3 Pitot Coefficient, Cp: 0.84 dimensionless Average Meter Temp., T m : 74.2 o F Gas Analysis: 13.0 % CO 2 Average Stack Temp., T s : 125.3 o F 6.5 % O 2 Average √ Δ p: 0.510 "H 2 O 0.0 % CO Condensate Volume, V l c : 115.4 ml 80.5 % N 2 Meter Box Y: 0.991 dimensionless F-factor, F d , for fuel: 9780 dscf/MMBtu

Data Calculated from Source Measurements: V w ( std ) = 4.707E-02 x V l c 5.432 scf V m ( std ) = 17.647 x V m x Y x (P b + ( Δ H / 13.6)) / (T m +460) 34.017 dscf B ws = V w ( std ) / (V m ( std ) + V w ( std ) ) 0.138 % FDA = 1.0 - B ws 0.862 % M d = (0.44 x %CO 2 ) + (0.32 x %O 2 ) + (0.28 x (%N 2 + % CO)) 30.34 lb./lb. mole M s = (M d x FDA) + (18.0 x B ws ) 28.64 lb./lb. mole

v s = 85.49 x C p x ( √Δ p) x ( √ (T s + 460) / (M s x P s )) 30.42 ft/second Q s = v s x A s x 60 825702.6 acf/minute Q s ( std ) = Q s x FDA x (528 / (T s + 460)) x (P s / 29.92)) 636612.4 dscf/minute I = (T s + 460) x ((2.67E-03 x V lc ) + (V m(std) / 17.647)) x 100 / ( θ x P s x A n x v s x 60) 101.3 %

Data from Laboratory Analysis: Total Particulate Weight From Laboratory Analysis: 0.031250 grams

Calculated Concentration and Emission Rate Data:

c s = (15.432 x grams) / V m(std) 0.014 grains/dscf grains/acf = c s x 17.647 x P s x (FDA / (T s + 460) 0.011 grains/acf C = c s / 7000 2.025E-06 lbs/dscf E M = C x Q s(std) x 60 77.4 lbs/hr E R = C x F d x (20.9 /(20.9 - %O 2 ) 0.029 lbs/MMBtu

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods Reference Method 5/17 Particulate Test Calculations

Customer: Tampa Electric Company Facility: Big Bend Station Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet Unit Under Test: Boiler #1 Operating Conditions: Non-Soot Blowing Run Number: 1 Date: 03/12/08

Sample Time, θ : 60 minutes Nozzle Diameter, D n : 0.270 inches Barometric Pressure, P b : 29.65 "Hg Nozzle Area, A n : 0.000398 ft 2 Stack Pressure, P s : 29.63 "Hg Average Orifice Meter, Δ H: 1.098 "H 2 O Effective Stack Area, A s : 452.389 ft 2 Sample Volume, V m : 35.882 ft 3 Pitot Coefficient, Cp: 0.84 dimensionless Average Meter Temp., T m : 71.7 o F Gas Analysis: 13.0 % CO 2 Average Stack Temp., T s : 127.0 o F 6.5 % O 2 Average √ Δ p: 0.525 "H 2 O 0.0 % CO Condensate Volume, V l c : 115.3 ml 80.5 % N 2 Meter Box Y: 0.991 dimensionless F-factor, F d , for fuel: 9780 dscf/MMBtu

Data Calculated from Source Measurements: V w ( std ) = 4.707E-02 x V l c 5.427 scf V m ( std ) = 17.647 x V m x Y x (P b + ( Δ H / 13.6)) / (T m +460) 35.090 dscf B ws = V w ( std ) / (V m ( std ) + V w ( std ) ) 0.134 % FDA = 1.0 - B ws 0.866 % M d = (0.44 x %CO 2 ) + (0.32 x %O 2 ) + (0.28 x (%N 2 + % CO)) 30.34 lb./lb. mole M s = (M d x FDA) + (18.0 x B ws ) 28.69 lb./lb. mole

v s = 85.49 x C p x ( √Δ p) x ( √ (T s + 460) / (M s x P s )) 31.35 ft/second Q s = v s x A s x 60 851013.4 acf/minute Q s ( std ) = Q s x FDA x (528 / (T s + 460)) x (P s / 29.92)) 656554.5 dscf/minute I = (T s + 460) x ((2.67E-03 x V lc ) + (V m(std) / 17.647)) x 100 / ( θ x P s x A n x v s x 60) 101.4 %

Data from Laboratory Analysis: Total Particulate Weight From Laboratory Analysis: 0.043950 grams

Calculated Concentration and Emission Rate Data:

c s = (15.432 x grams) / V m(std) 0.019 grains/dscf grains/acf = c s x 17.647 x P s x (FDA / (T s + 460) 0.015 grains/acf C = c s / 7000 2.761E-06 lbs/dscf E M = C x Q s(std) x 60 108.8 lbs/hr E R = C x F d x (20.9 /(20.9 - %O 2 ) 0.039 lbs/MMBtu

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods Reference Method 5/17 Particulate Test Calculations

Customer: Tampa Electric Company Facility: Big Bend Station Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet Unit Under Test: Boiler #1 Operating Conditions: Non-Soot Blowing Run Number: 2 Date: 03/12/08

Sample Time, θ : 60 minutes Nozzle Diameter, D n : 0.270 inches Barometric Pressure, P b : 29.65 "Hg Nozzle Area, A n : 0.000398 ft 2 Stack Pressure, P s : 29.63 "Hg Average Orifice Meter, Δ H: 1.123 "H 2 O Effective Stack Area, A s : 452.389 ft 2 Sample Volume, V m : 36.217 ft 3 Pitot Coefficient, Cp: 0.84 dimensionless Average Meter Temp., T m : 77.8 o F Gas Analysis: 13.0 % CO 2 Average Stack Temp., T s : 126.1 o F 6.5 % O 2 Average √ Δ p: 0.528 "H 2 O 0.0 % CO Condensate Volume, V l c : 120.4 ml 80.5 % N 2 Meter Box Y: 0.991 dimensionless F-factor, F d , for fuel: 9780 dscf/MMBtu

Data Calculated from Source Measurements: V w ( std ) = 4.707E-02 x V l c 5.667 scf V m ( std ) = 17.647 x V m x Y x (P b + ( Δ H / 13.6)) / (T m +460) 35.019 dscf B ws = V w ( std ) / (V m ( std ) + V w ( std ) ) 0.139 % FDA = 1.0 - B ws 0.861 % M d = (0.44 x %CO 2 ) + (0.32 x %O 2 ) + (0.28 x (%N 2 + % CO)) 30.34 lb./lb. mole M s = (M d x FDA) + (18.0 x B ws ) 28.62 lb./lb. mole

v s = 85.49 x C p x ( √Δ p) x ( √ (T s + 460) / (M s x P s )) 31.53 ft/second Q s = v s x A s x 60 855803.1 acf/minute Q s ( std ) = Q s x FDA x (528 / (T s + 460)) x (P s / 29.92)) 657202.4 dscf/minute I = (T s + 460) x ((2.67E-03 x V lc ) + (V m(std) / 17.647)) x 100 / ( θ x P s x A n x v s x 60) 101.1 %

Data from Laboratory Analysis: Total Particulate Weight From Laboratory Analysis: 0.037350 grams

Calculated Concentration and Emission Rate Data:

c s = (15.432 x grams) / V m(std) 0.016 grains/dscf grains/acf = c s x 17.647 x P s x (FDA / (T s + 460) 0.013 grains/acf C = c s / 7000 2.351E-06 lbs/dscf E M = C x Q s(std) x 60 92.7 lbs/hr E R = C x F d x (20.9 /(20.9 - %O 2 ) 0.033 lbs/MMBtu

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods Reference Method 5/17 Particulate Test Calculations

Customer: Tampa Electric Company Facility: Big Bend Station Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet Unit Under Test: Boiler #1 Operating Conditions: Non-Soot Blowing Run Number: 3 Date: 03/12/08

Sample Time, θ : 60 minutes Nozzle Diameter, D n : 0.270 inches Barometric Pressure, P b : 29.67 "Hg Nozzle Area, A n : 0.000398 ft 2 Stack Pressure, P s : 29.65 "Hg Average Orifice Meter, Δ H: 1.079 "H 2 O Effective Stack Area, A s : 452.389 ft 2 Sample Volume, V m : 35.355 ft 3 Pitot Coefficient, Cp: 0.84 dimensionless Average Meter Temp., T m : 74.8 o F Gas Analysis: 13.0 % CO 2 Average Stack Temp., T s : 124.8 o F 6.5 % O 2 Average √ Δ p: 0.518 "H 2 O 0.0 % CO Condensate Volume, V l c : 117.6 ml 80.5 % N 2 Meter Box Y: 0.991 dimensionless F-factor, F d , for fuel: 9780 dscf/MMBtu

Data Calculated from Source Measurements: V w ( std ) = 4.707E-02 x V l c 5.535 scf V m ( std ) = 17.647 x V m x Y x (P b + ( Δ H / 13.6)) / (T m +460) 34.392 dscf B ws = V w ( std ) / (V m ( std ) + V w ( std ) ) 0.139 % FDA = 1.0 - B ws 0.861 % M d = (0.44 x %CO 2 ) + (0.32 x %O 2 ) + (0.28 x (%N 2 + % CO)) 30.34 lb./lb. mole M s = (M d x FDA) + (18.0 x B ws ) 28.63 lb./lb. mole

v s = 85.49 x C p x ( √Δ p) x ( √ (T s + 460) / (M s x P s )) 30.88 ft/second Q s = v s x A s x 60 838132.9 acf/minute Q s ( std ) = Q s x FDA x (528 / (T s + 460)) x (P s / 29.92)) 645976.4 dscf/minute I = (T s + 460) x ((2.67E-03 x V lc ) + (V m(std) / 17.647)) x 100 / ( θ x P s x A n x v s x 60) 101.0 %

Data from Laboratory Analysis: Total Particulate Weight From Laboratory Analysis: 0.026250 grams

Calculated Concentration and Emission Rate Data:

c s = (15.432 x grams) / V m(std) 0.0118 grains/dscf grains/acf = c s x 17.647 x P s x (FDA / (T s + 460) 0.0091 grains/acf C = c s / 7000 1.683E-06 lbs/dscf E M = C x Q s(std) x 60 65.2 lbs/hr E R = C x F d x (20.9 /(20.9 - %O 2 ) 0.024 lbs/MMBtu

## APPENDIX B

PARTICULATE MATTER LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATACustomer Karen Zwolak Plant Big Bend Unit1Method RM 5-B Stack Test Completion DateAnalyst Sam SothSample NumberAA93556ACETONE BEAKER1st weighing Date 03/20/2008 Time 8:45 % RH 55.0%2nd weighing Date 03/20/2008 Time 14:50 % RH 55.0%3rd weighing Date Time % RH4th weighing Date Time % RH***Blank***Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 1S Run 2S Run 3SAcetone Container IDAIR AJ AIR AK AIR AI AIR AL AIR AH AIR AG AIR AAAcetone Rinse Vol.(Va), mls 200.0000 200 200 200 200 200 2001st Gross Wt., grams 102.3341 100.5185 99.5939 102.0838 103.0883 101.9416 104.55122nd Gross Wt., grams 102.3339 100.5183 99.5940 102.0835 103.0880 101.9417 104.55163rd Gross Wt., grams4th Gross Wt., gramsAvg. Gross Wt., grams 102.33400 100.51840 99.59395 102.08365 103.08815 101.94165 104.55140Tare Wt., grams 102.33325 100.50725 99.58885 102.07985 103.07260 101.93485 104.54410Acetone Blank Wt.,mg0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75Acetone Particulate Wt.,mg10.40 4.35 3.05 14.80 6.05 6.55Acetone Residue, mg/g0.0047Acetone Blank CriteriaFILTER1st weighingDate 03/18/2008 Time 16:25 % RH 52.0%Date 03/19/2008 Time 9:40 % RH 55.0%3rd weighing Date 03/19/2008 Time 15:50 % RH 53.0%4th weighing Date 03/20/2008 Time 8:40 % RH 55.0%Filter/Thimble ID 203071 203064 203067 203065 203063 203069 2030661st Gross Wt., grams 0.2510 0.2861 0.2828 0.2724 0.2862 0.2776 0.27532nd Gross Wt., grams 0.2512 0.2879 0.2850 0.2745 0.2880 0.2783 0.27673rd Gross Wt., grams 0.2511 0.2865 0.2846 0.2745 0.2871 0.2780 0.27664th Gross Wt., grams 0.2512 0.2865 0.2848 0.2747 0.2874 0.2781 0.2767Avg. Gross Wt., grams 0.25110 0.28650 0.28480 0.27450 0.28725 0.27815 0.27665Tare Wt., grams 0.25110 0.25295 0.25180 0.25130 0.25240 0.25025 0.25195Filter Particulate Wt.,mg33.55 33.00 23.20 34.85 27.90 24.70Difference, milligrams0Total Sample Particulate Wt.,mg43.95 37.35 26.25 49.65 33.95 31.25OK to subtract acetone blankStart Here

## APPENDIX C

BOILER/PRECIPITATOR OPERATIONAL DATA

## APPENDIX D

PLANT CEMS DAHS PRINTOUTS

### CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21

03/12/2008 7:28 23.3 10.2 03/12/2008 7:29 23.4 10.1 03/12/2008 7:30 22.3 10 03/12/2008 7:31 21.1 9.8 03/12/2008 7:32 20.3 9.7 03/12/2008 7:33 20.2 9.7 03/12/2008 7:34 21.7 9.9 03/12/2008 7:35 21.5 10 03/12/2008 7:36 21.6 10.1 03/12/2008 7:37 22.8 10.2 03/12/2008 7:38 22.6 10.3 03/12/2008 7:39 22.2 10.2 03/12/2008 7:40 22.7 10.1 03/12/2008 7:41 23.1 10.1 03/12/2008 7:42 21.6 9.9 03/12/2008 7:43 21.6 9.7 03/12/2008 7:44 21.4 9.9 03/12/2008 7:45 22 9.9 03/12/2008 7:46 22.4 10 03/12/2008 7:47 21.6 10.1 03/12/2008 7:48 23.1 10.3 03/12/2008 7:49 25.1 10.4 03/12/2008 7:50 24.2 10.4 03/12/2008 7:51 23.3 10.4 03/12/2008 7:52 23.2 10.4 03/12/2008 7:53 22 10.2 03/12/2008 7:54 21.9 10.1 03/12/2008 7:55 21.8 10 03/12/2008 7:56 20.9 9.8 03/12/2008 7:57 20.4 9.7 03/12/2008 7:58 20.6 9.7 03/12/2008 7:59 20.8 9.8 03/12/2008 8:00 21.2 9.9 03/12/2008 8:01 22.1 10 03/12/2008 8:02 23.1 10.3 03/12/2008 8:03 23.3 10.4 03/12/2008 8:04 23.1 10.3 03/12/2008 8:05 22.7 10.2 03/12/2008 8:06 24 10.3 03/12/2008 8:07 23.3 10.2

Page 1 of 13

### CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21

03/12/2008 8:08 22.6 10.1 03/12/2008 8:09 22.9 10 03/12/2008 8:10 23.4 10 03/12/2008 8:11 22.9 10 03/12/2008 8:12 23.4 9.9 03/12/2008 8:13 22.7 9.9 03/12/2008 8:14 22.5 9.8 03/12/2008 8:15 22.8 10 03/12/2008 8:16 23 10 03/12/2008 8:17 22.1 10.1 03/12/2008 8:18 21.7 10.1 03/12/2008 8:19 21.9 10.1 03/12/2008 8:20 22.3 10.2 03/12/2008 8:21 22.7 10.2 03/12/2008 8:22 19.5 9.7 03/12/2008 8:23 69.7 7.1 03/12/2008 8:24 108.3 10.6 03/12/2008 8:25 110.1 11 03/12/2008 8:26 109.9 11 03/12/2008 8:27 110.3 11 03/12/2008 8:28 110.4 11 03/12/2008 8:29 109.9 11.1 03/12/2008 8:30 101.2 10.8 03/12/2008 8:31 16.6 3.6 03/12/2008 8:32 1.4 0.3 03/12/2008 8:33 0.6 0.1 03/12/2008 8:34 0.4 0.1 03/12/2008 8:35 0 0.1 03/12/2008 8:36 -0.3 0 03/12/2008 8:37 -0.4 0 03/12/2008 8:38 164.3 3.2 03/12/2008 8:39 200.6 10.2 03/12/2008 8:40 200.6 11 03/12/2008 8:41 200.6 11 03/12/2008 8:42 200.5 11 03/12/2008 8:43 200.6 11 03/12/2008 8:44 200.7 11 03/12/2008 8:45 200.6 10.7 03/12/2008 8:46 146.8 3.6 03/12/2008 8:47 25 0.2

Page 2 of 13

### CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21

03/12/2008 8:48 23.6 1.2 03/12/2008 8:49 39.2 7.8 03/12/2008 8:50 34.8 9.6 03/12/2008 8:51 33 9.8 03/12/2008 8:52 31.4 9.8 03/12/2008 8:53 30 9.9 03/12/2008 8:54 29.3 9.9 03/12/2008 8:55 29.2 9.9 03/12/2008 8:56 29 9.8 03/12/2008 8:57 28.8 9.9 03/12/2008 8:58 27.9 9.9 03/12/2008 8:59 27 9.9 03/12/2008 9:00 27.2 9.9 03/12/2008 9:01 26.9 9.9 03/12/2008 9:02 27.2 9.9 03/12/2008 9:03 27.1 10 03/12/2008 9:04 26.6 9.9 03/12/2008 9:05 24.9 9.8 03/12/2008 9:06 24.8 9.8 03/12/2008 9:07 24.7 9.8 03/12/2008 9:08 24.2 9.8 03/12/2008 9:09 24.9 9.8 03/12/2008 9:10 24.7 9.8 03/12/2008 9:11 24 9.7 03/12/2008 9:12 25.2 9.9 03/12/2008 9:13 24.6 9.8 03/12/2008 9:14 23.7 9.7 03/12/2008 9:15 24.4 9.8 03/12/2008 9:16 25.9 9.9 03/12/2008 9:17 26.7 10 03/12/2008 9:18 25.8 10 03/12/2008 9:19 25.4 10 03/12/2008 9:20 26.4 10 03/12/2008 9:21 26.8 10.1 03/12/2008 9:22 26.6 10.1 03/12/2008 9:23 26.3 10 03/12/2008 9:24 26.4 10 03/12/2008 9:25 25.9 10 03/12/2008 9:26 24.8 9.9 03/12/2008 9:27 24.5 9.9

Page 3 of 13

### CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21

03/12/2008 9:28 25.1 10 03/12/2008 9:29 24 10 03/12/2008 9:30 23.9 9.9 03/12/2008 9:31 23.6 9.9 03/12/2008 9:32 22.6 9.8 03/12/2008 9:33 22.6 9.7 03/12/2008 9:34 22.6 9.7 03/12/2008 9:35 22.2 9.6 03/12/2008 9:36 23.4 9.8 03/12/2008 9:37 23.2 9.7 03/12/2008 9:38 23.7 9.8 03/12/2008 9:39 24.1 9.9 03/12/2008 9:40 24.3 9.9 03/12/2008 9:41 23.7 9.9 03/12/2008 9:42 23.8 9.9 03/12/2008 9:43 24.8 10 03/12/2008 9:44 24.2 9.8 03/12/2008 9:45 24.6 9.9 03/12/2008 9:46 25.1 9.9 03/12/2008 9:47 24.5 9.9 03/12/2008 9:48 25.2 9.9 03/12/2008 9:49 26.7 10.1 03/12/2008 9:50 24.7 10 03/12/2008 9:51 24.5 9.9 03/12/2008 9:52 24.7 10 03/12/2008 9:53 23.6 10 03/12/2008 9:54 24 10 03/12/2008 9:55 24 9.9 03/12/2008 9:56 24 9.9 03/12/2008 9:57 24.3 10.1 03/12/2008 9:58 23.7 10 03/12/2008 9:59 24.1 9.9 03/12/2008 10:00 23.9 10 03/12/2008 10:01 24.5 10 03/12/2008 10:02 24.2 9.9 03/12/2008 10:03 24.1 9.9 03/12/2008 10:04 24.2 9.9 03/12/2008 10:05 24.7 9.9 03/12/2008 10:06 25.1 10 03/12/2008 10:07 25.3 10

Page 4 of 13

### CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21 03/12/2008 10:56 24.5 9.9 03/12/2008 10:57 25.3 9.9 03/12/2008 10:58 26.3 9.8 03/12/2008 10:59 24.8 9.7 03/12/2008 11:00 24.6 9.6 03/12/2008 11:01 24.7 9.6 03/12/2008 11:02 24.8 9.6 03/12/2008 11:03 24.8 9.6 03/12/2008 11:04 25.2 9.6 03/12/2008 11:05 23.7 9.6 03/12/2008 11:06 22.6 9.6 03/12/2008 11:07 23.2 9.7 03/12/2008 11:08 23.2 9.7 03/12/2008 11:09 23.2 9.7 03/12/2008 11:10 23.6 9.8 03/12/2008 11:11 23.9 9.9 03/12/2008 11:12 24 9.9 03/12/2008 11:13 25.2 9.9 03/12/2008 11:14 24.7 10 03/12/2008 11:15 25.3 10.1 03/12/2008 11:16 26.2 10.1 03/12/2008 11:17 26.8 10.1 03/12/2008 11:18 26.6 10.1 03/12/2008 11:19 26.9 10.1 03/12/2008 11:20 27.1 10.1 03/12/2008 11:21 26.7 10.1 03/12/2008 11:22 27.3 10.1 03/12/2008 11:23 27.2 10 03/12/2008 11:24 27.1 9.9 03/12/2008 11:25 26.1 9.9 03/12/2008 11:26 25.5 9.7 03/12/2008 11:27 25.2 9.6 03/12/2008 11:28 25.6 9.6 03/12/2008 11:29 24.8 9.5 03/12/2008 11:30 24.8 9.5 03/12/2008 11:31 24.9 9.6 03/12/2008 11:32 23.9 9.6 03/12/2008 11:33 24.3 9.7 03/12/2008 11:34 24.8 9.8 03/12/2008 11:35 24.4 9.8

Page 5 of 13

### CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21 03/12/2008 11:36 24.6 9.8 03/12/2008 11:37 25.1 10 03/12/2008 11:38 24.9 9.9 03/12/2008 11:39 25.7 9.9 03/12/2008 11:40 26.1 10 03/12/2008 11:41 25 9.9 03/12/2008 11:42 24.4 9.9 03/12/2008 11:43 25.2 9.9 03/12/2008 11:44 24.7 9.9 03/12/2008 11:45 24.6 9.8 03/12/2008 11:46 24.4 9.7 03/12/2008 11:47 24.4 9.8 03/12/2008 11:48 23.9 9.8 03/12/2008 11:49 24.5 9.7 03/12/2008 11:50 25.5 9.9 03/12/2008 11:51 26.9 9.9 03/12/2008 11:52 27.4 10 03/12/2008 11:53 27.7 10.2 03/12/2008 11:54 26.5 10.1 03/12/2008 11:55 26.7 10.2 03/12/2008 11:56 26.4 10.2 03/12/2008 11:57 25.1 10.1 03/12/2008 11:58 25.3 10 03/12/2008 11:59 24.2 9.9 03/12/2008 12:00 24.1 9.8 03/12/2008 12:01 25 9.8 03/12/2008 12:02 24.9 9.8 03/12/2008 12:03 24.7 9.8 03/12/2008 12:04 25.6 9.8 03/12/2008 12:05 25.3 9.9 03/12/2008 12:06 26 9.9 03/12/2008 12:07 27 10.1 03/12/2008 12:08 26.4 10 03/12/2008 12:09 26.9 10 03/12/2008 12:10 27.5 10.1 03/12/2008 12:11 27.5 10.1 03/12/2008 12:12 26.4 10 03/12/2008 12:13 27 9.9 03/12/2008 12:14 26.9 10 03/12/2008 12:15 26.5 9.9

Page 6 of 13

### CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21 03/12/2008 12:16 26.6 9.9 03/12/2008 12:17 26.2 9.8 03/12/2008 12:18 26.6 9.9 03/12/2008 12:19 26 9.9 03/12/2008 12:20 25.4 9.9 03/12/2008 12:21 25.1 9.9 03/12/2008 12:22 25.3 9.9 03/12/2008 12:23 24.9 10 03/12/2008 12:24 24.8 10 03/12/2008 12:25 25.7 10.2 03/12/2008 12:26 26 10.2 03/12/2008 12:27 27.3 10.3 03/12/2008 12:28 26.1 10.2 03/12/2008 12:29 26.4 10.2 03/12/2008 12:30 26.8 10.2 03/12/2008 12:31 26.7 10.1 03/12/2008 12:32 28 10.1 03/12/2008 12:33 27.1 10 03/12/2008 12:34 27.2 9.8 03/12/2008 12:35 26.6 9.8 03/12/2008 12:36 26.8 9.8 03/12/2008 12:37 28.4 10 03/12/2008 12:38 27.3 9.9 03/12/2008 12:39 28.5 9.9 03/12/2008 12:40 28.4 9.9 03/12/2008 12:41 30 10.1 03/12/2008 12:42 30.2 10.2 03/12/2008 12:43 30 10.1 03/12/2008 12:44 29.7 10.2 03/12/2008 12:45 28.6 10.2 03/12/2008 12:46 29 10.1 03/12/2008 12:47 28.1 10.1 03/12/2008 12:48 27.4 10.1 03/12/2008 12:49 27.7 10.2 03/12/2008 12:50 26.5 10.1 03/12/2008 12:51 25.6 10.2 03/12/2008 12:52 27.4 10.2 03/12/2008 12:53 28.9 10.2 03/12/2008 12:54 28.2 10.2 03/12/2008 12:55 28.8 10.1

Page 7 of 13

### CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21 03/12/2008 12:56 28.7 10.1 03/12/2008 12:57 27.6 9.9 03/12/2008 12:58 28 9.9 03/12/2008 12:59 27.3 10 03/12/2008 13:00 26.6 9.8 03/12/2008 13:01 26.2 9.8 03/12/2008 13:02 26.7 9.8 03/12/2008 13:03 26.5 9.7 03/12/2008 13:04 26.5 9.8 03/12/2008 13:05 27.6 9.8 03/12/2008 13:06 28.1 9.8 03/12/2008 13:07 28.6 9.9 03/12/2008 13:08 29.4 10 03/12/2008 13:09 28 10 03/12/2008 13:10 28.5 10.1 03/12/2008 13:11 28.4 10.1 03/12/2008 13:12 27 10.2 03/12/2008 13:13 26.4 10.1 03/12/2008 13:14 26.3 10.1 03/12/2008 13:15 26 10 03/12/2008 13:16 26.7 10 03/12/2008 13:17 26.6 10 03/12/2008 13:18 26.6 9.9 03/12/2008 13:19 26.8 9.9 03/12/2008 13:20 26.7 9.9 03/12/2008 13:21 26.2 9.8 03/12/2008 13:22 27.3 9.9 03/12/2008 13:23 26.5 9.7 03/12/2008 13:24 26.3 9.7 03/12/2008 13:25 26.5 9.7 03/12/2008 13:26 26.5 9.7 03/12/2008 13:27 26.9 9.7 03/12/2008 13:28 27.5 9.8 03/12/2008 13:29 28 9.9 03/12/2008 13:30 27.9 9.9 03/12/2008 13:31 28.4 9.9 03/12/2008 13:32 27.8 10 03/12/2008 13:33 27.3 9.9 03/12/2008 13:34 26.9 9.9 03/12/2008 13:35 26 9.9

Page 8 of 13

### CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21 03/12/2008 13:36 25.4 9.9 03/12/2008 13:37 25.9 9.8 03/12/2008 13:38 26.9 9.9 03/12/2008 13:39 26 9.8 03/12/2008 13:40 26.1 9.8 03/12/2008 13:41 26.6 9.8 03/12/2008 13:42 26.8 9.8 03/12/2008 13:43 26.2 9.8 03/12/2008 13:44 25.1 9.6 03/12/2008 13:45 26 9.7 03/12/2008 13:46 25.8 9.6 03/12/2008 13:47 25.7 9.7 03/12/2008 13:48 26 9.7 03/12/2008 13:49 26.2 9.7 03/12/2008 13:50 26.8 9.7 03/12/2008 13:51 26.5 9.7 03/12/2008 13:52 27.4 9.7 03/12/2008 13:53 26 9.8 03/12/2008 13:54 25.8 9.7 03/12/2008 13:55 26.4 9.7 03/12/2008 13:56 27.2 9.7 03/12/2008 13:57 26.6 9.7 03/12/2008 13:58 26.1 9.7 03/12/2008 13:59 25.6 9.7 03/12/2008 14:00 25.7 9.7 03/12/2008 14:01 26 9.8 03/12/2008 14:02 24.8 9.7 03/12/2008 14:03 25.2 9.7 03/12/2008 14:04 25.7 9.8 03/12/2008 14:05 24.9 9.7 03/12/2008 14:06 24.9 9.7 03/12/2008 14:07 25.2 9.7 03/12/2008 14:08 24.9 9.7 03/12/2008 14:09 25.7 9.8 03/12/2008 14:10 25.6 9.6 03/12/2008 14:11 24.7 9.6 03/12/2008 14:12 24.1 9.6 03/12/2008 14:13 23.8 9.4 03/12/2008 14:14 24.2 9.4 03/12/2008 14:15 24.3 9.4

Page 9 of 13

### CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21 03/12/2008 14:16 23.9 9.5 03/12/2008 14:17 24.5 9.5 03/12/2008 14:18 25.6 9.6 03/12/2008 14:19 26.5 9.9 03/12/2008 14:20 27.2 9.9 03/12/2008 14:21 29.2 10.1 03/12/2008 14:22 29.3 10.2 03/12/2008 14:23 29.6 10.2 03/12/2008 14:24 28.6 10.2 03/12/2008 14:25 26.4 9.9 03/12/2008 14:26 25.9 9.9 03/12/2008 14:27 26.6 9.8 03/12/2008 14:28 25.5 9.8 03/12/2008 14:29 25 9.7 03/12/2008 14:30 25.1 9.6 03/12/2008 14:31 24.9 9.5 03/12/2008 14:32 25 9.5 03/12/2008 14:33 24.9 9.6 03/12/2008 14:34 24 9.4 03/12/2008 14:35 23.4 9.4 03/12/2008 14:36 24 9.4 03/12/2008 14:37 25.2 9.5 03/12/2008 14:38 25.6 9.7 03/12/2008 14:39 25 9.6 03/12/2008 14:40 26 9.7 03/12/2008 14:41 27 9.9 03/12/2008 14:42 27.9 10 03/12/2008 14:43 27.3 10 03/12/2008 14:44 27 10 03/12/2008 14:45 27.5 9.9 03/12/2008 14:46 27.7 9.8 03/12/2008 14:47 27 9.7 03/12/2008 14:48 25.5 9.7 03/12/2008 14:49 25 9.7 03/12/2008 14:50 24.4 9.6 03/12/2008 14:51 23.6 9.5 03/12/2008 14:52 23.4 9.4 03/12/2008 14:53 23.5 9.5 03/12/2008 14:54 23.7 9.5 03/12/2008 14:55 24.5 9.6

Page 10 of 13

### CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21 03/12/2008 14:56 23.8 9.6 03/12/2008 14:57 23 9.6 03/12/2008 14:58 24.4 9.6 03/12/2008 14:59 24.1 9.7 03/12/2008 15:00 24.4 9.7 03/12/2008 15:01 25.2 9.7 03/12/2008 15:02 25.4 9.7 03/12/2008 15:03 25 9.7 03/12/2008 15:04 25.2 9.7 03/12/2008 15:05 24.5 9.6 03/12/2008 15:06 24.5 9.6 03/12/2008 15:07 25.4 9.6 03/12/2008 15:08 24.1 9.5 03/12/2008 15:09 24.4 9.6 03/12/2008 15:10 25.1 9.6 03/12/2008 15:11 25.1 9.7 03/12/2008 15:12 25.3 9.7 03/12/2008 15:13 24.7 9.6 03/12/2008 15:14 24 9.6 03/12/2008 15:15 24.3 9.6 03/12/2008 15:16 24.1 9.8 03/12/2008 15:17 24.1 9.7 03/12/2008 15:18 24 9.7 03/12/2008 15:19 24.6 9.7 03/12/2008 15:20 24.8 9.7 03/12/2008 15:21 25.1 9.7 03/12/2008 15:22 25.7 9.8 03/12/2008 15:23 25.3 9.8 03/12/2008 15:24 25.3 9.7 03/12/2008 15:25 24.5 9.7 03/12/2008 15:26 23.9 9.6 03/12/2008 15:27 25.7 9.8 03/12/2008 15:28 26 9.7 03/12/2008 15:29 24.9 9.6 03/12/2008 15:30 24.5 9.5 03/12/2008 15:31 25.1 9.6 03/12/2008 15:32 25.2 9.7 03/12/2008 15:33 25.5 9.7 03/12/2008 15:34 25.1 9.7 03/12/2008 15:35 25.4 9.7

Page 11 of 13

### CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21 03/12/2008 15:36 25.3 9.8 03/12/2008 15:37 24.7 9.8 03/12/2008 15:38 24.8 9.8 03/12/2008 15:39 25.1 9.9 03/12/2008 15:40 24.6 9.9 03/12/2008 15:41 24.2 9.8 03/12/2008 15:42 24.5 9.9 03/12/2008 15:43 25 9.9 03/12/2008 15:44 24.6 9.8 03/12/2008 15:45 24.3 9.7 03/12/2008 15:46 24.1 9.6 03/12/2008 15:47 24.5 9.7 03/12/2008 15:48 24.8 9.7 03/12/2008 15:49 24.9 9.7 03/12/2008 15:50 24 9.6 03/12/2008 15:51 24.7 9.7 03/12/2008 15:52 25.4 9.8 03/12/2008 15:53 25.4 9.8 03/12/2008 15:54 25 9.7 03/12/2008 15:55 26.4 9.7 03/12/2008 15:56 26.6 9.8 03/12/2008 15:57 26.1 9.8 03/12/2008 15:58 26.7 9.8 03/12/2008 15:59 25.5 9.9 03/12/2008 16:00 25.4 9.9 03/12/2008 16:01 25.3 9.8 03/12/2008 16:02 23.7 9.7 03/12/2008 16:03 23.4 9.5 03/12/2008 16:04 23.5 9.6 03/12/2008 16:05 23.7 9.6 03/12/2008 16:06 23.8 9.5 03/12/2008 16:07 23.4 9.5 03/12/2008 16:08 22.8 9.5 03/12/2008 16:09 22.9 9.4 03/12/2008 16:10 23.8 9.4 03/12/2008 16:11 24 9.6 03/12/2008 16:12 25.1 9.8 03/12/2008 16:13 26.5 10 03/12/2008 16:14 26.5 10 03/12/2008 16:15 26.6 9.9

Page 12 of 13

### CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21 03/12/2008 16:16 27.4 10 03/12/2008 16:17 27.8 10.1 03/12/2008 16:18 28.9 10.2 03/12/2008 16:19 29 10.2 03/12/2008 16:20 29.4 10.3 03/12/2008 16:21 29.9 10.3 03/12/2008 16:22 29.3 10.3 03/12/2008 16:23 28.2 10.1 03/12/2008 16:24 26.7 9.9 03/12/2008 16:25 24.5 9.6 03/12/2008 16:26 23.7 9.5 03/12/2008 16:27 23.1 9.4 03/12/2008 16:28 23.1 9.4 03/12/2008 16:29 23.2 9.4 03/12/2008 16:30 22.5 9.4 03/12/2008 16:31 22.1 9.3 03/12/2008 16:32 23 9.5 03/12/2008 16:33 23.3 9.6 03/12/2008 16:34 22.2 9.4 03/12/2008 16:35 22.5 9.5 03/12/2008 16:36 22.7 9.6 03/12/2008 16:37 23.6 9.6 03/12/2008 16:38 24.1 9.7 03/12/2008 16:39 24.1 9.6 03/12/2008 16:40 23.8 9.5 03/12/2008 16:41 24 9.5 03/12/2008 16:42 24.7 9.6 03/12/2008 16:43 24.3 9.5 03/12/2008 16:44 24.2 9.5 03/12/2008 16:45 23.8 9.5 03/12/2008 16:46 24.6 9.2 03/12/2008 16:47 15 2.9 03/12/2008 16:48 0.1 0.2 03/12/2008 16:49 -0.4 0 A verages: 25.2415 9.814393

Page 13 of 13

## APPENDIX E

FUEL ANALYSIS

## Laboratory Services
5012 Causeway Blvd * Tampa Fl. 33619 Ph (813) 630-7378 * Fax (813) 630-7360 * DOH #E54272

04/22/2008 Report For:

TE_BB_1_COMP_CO Location Code: Location Description: Sample Collector: Sample Collection Date: Lab Submittal Date: 

### Sample Information

Big Bend 1 Compliance 03/12/2008 03/18/2008

JOHN GORHAM Report Date: 

## Laboratory ID: AA93556

Laboratory Results

Coal Analysis - As Received Result Units Lower Limit Upper Limit Violation

% Ash, as Received 8.49
BTU/Lb BTU, as Received 11932
% Carbon, as Received 65.83
% Hydrogen, as Received 4.20
% Nitrogen, as Received 1.38
% Oxygen, as Received 5.64
% Sulfur, as Received 2.89


### Coal Analysis - Dry Basis Result Units Lower Limit Upper Limit Violation

% Ash, Dry Basis 9.58
BTU/Lb. BTU, Dry Basis 13470
% Carbon, Dry Basis 74.32
% Hydrogen, Dry Basis 4.74
% Nitrogen, Dry Basis 1.56
% Oxygen, Dry Basis 6.37
% Sulfur, Dry Basis 3.26


### Coal Analysis - Mi scellaneous Result Units Lower Limit Upper Limit Violation

BTU/Lb. BTU, Moisture-Ash Free 14897
Lbs. SO2/MMBTU Pounds SO2 / Million BTU 4.60
% Total Moisture 11.42

Report Number: -042208- 12 AA93556 Page 1 of 2 "Coal Report"

## Laboratory Services
5012 Causeway Blvd * Tampa Fl. 33619 Ph (813) 630-7378 * Fax (813) 630-7360 * DOH #E54272



### Trace Anions in Coal Result Units Lower Limit Upper Limit Violation

% Chlorine as Cl, as Received 0.15
% Chlorine as Cl, Dry Basis 0.17

Unit #1 

### Comments

Ray McDarby,

Manager, Laboratory Services For Peggy Penner,

Report Number: -042208- 12 AA93556 Page 2 of 2 "Coal Report"

## APPENDIX F

FIELD DATA SHEETS

## APPENDIX G

SAMPLING EQUIPMENT CALIBRATIONS

## SUMMARY OF E Q UIPMENT CALIBRATION S

EQUIPMENT CAL DATE METHOD RESULTS
CONSOLE (MB 07) INITIA L 02/01/2008 USEPA RM 5 0.991 POST TEST 03/14/2008 (ORIFICE) 0.989
NOZZLE (SN09) INITIA L 02/01/2008 CALIPER 0.270 POST TEST 03/14/2008 MEASUREMENTS 0.270

PYROMETER (PY 09) 02/01/2008 ASTM THERMOMETER + 2 o 

### F
PITOT TUBE (PT 09) 02/01/2008 USEPA RM 2 C p 

### = 0.84

BAROMETER (BR 06) 02/01/2008 NWS COMPARISON + 0.01" Hg

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

Blue Team Manufacturer: Thermo Anderson Calibration Date: Model Number:MST-C1 Barometric Pressure: 30.14 "Hg Instrument Code Number: ^MB07 Theoretical Critical Vacuum: 14.22 "Hg LabWorks Sample Number: Calibrated By:

Initial Final Total Δ H Time Volume Volume Volume Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet "H 2 

### O Minutes ft 3 

### ft 3 

### ft 3 

### oF oF oF oF 0.60 15 226.200 233.121 6.921 81 79 80 80 1.10 15 200.900 210.118 9.218 84 80 83 80 1.90 15 165.200 176.965 11.765 83 75 84 77 3.60 15 184.100 200.186 16.086 90 78 83 80

Orifice K' A ctual Serial Orifice Vacuum Initial Final Average Number Coefficient "Hg oF oF oF 48 0.3455 22.0 72 72 72.0 55 0.4592 20.5 72 72 72.0 63 0.5877 18.5 72 72 72.0 73 0.8022 15.5 72 72 72.0

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Calibration Volume Volume Volume Y Δ H α Corrected Corrected Nominal Value QA/QC Value QA/QC Vm (std) , ft 3 Vcr (std) , ft 3 Vcr (std) , ft 3 

### (ratio) + 0.02 "H 2 

### O + 0.2

6.824 6.772 6.776 0.992 0.002 1.631 -0.097 9.071 9.001 9.006 0.992 0.001 1.687 -0.040 11.643 11.520 11.527 0.989 -0.001 1.786 0.058 15.896 15.724 15.734 0.989 -0.002 1.806 0.079 Averages: 0.991 1.727

Review/Approval: 

### USEPA Reference Method 5 Dry Gas Meter Calibration

Critical Orifice Method Quarterly Calibration

02/01/2008

GDB

IMPORTANT For valid test results, the Actual Vacuum should be 1 to 2 "Hg greater than the Theoretical Critical Vacuum Shown above. The Critical Orifice Coefficient, K', should be in English units. 

### IMPORTANT Dry Gas Meter Readings Initial Temperatures Final Tempertures

For Calibration Y, the ratio of the reading of the calibration orifice to the dry gas meter, acceptable tolerance from average is + 0.02. For Calibration Δ H α , the acceptable tolerance of individual values from the average is + 0.2.



### 4-Feb-08 Critical Orifice Readings Ambient Temperatures

CALCULATED DATA Critical Orifice

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

Manufacturer: THERMO Calibration Date: Model Number:MST Barometric Pressure: 29.96 "Hg Instrument Code Number: MB07 Theoretical Critical Vacuum: 14.13 "Hg LabWorks Sample Number: Calibrated By: A ssociated Test: Team: BLUE

Initial Final Total Δ H Time Volume Volume Volume Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet "H 2 

### O Minutes ft 3 

### ft 3 

### ft 3 

### oF oF oF oF

1.1 10 757.800 763.890 6.090 75 72 77 73 1.1 10 763.890 769.970 6.080 77 73 77 74 1.1 10 769.970 776.070 6.100 77 74 77 74

Orifice K' A ctual Serial Orifice Vacuum Initial Final Average Number Coefficient "Hg oF oF oF 55 0.4593 21.0 72 72 72.0 55 0.4593 21.0 72 72 72.0 55 0.4593 21.0 72 72 72.0

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Calibration Volume Volume Volume Y Δ H α Corrected Corrected Nominal Value QA/QC Value QA/QC Vm (std) , ft 3 Vcr (std) , ft 3 Vcr (std) , ft 3 

### (ratio) + 0.02 "H 2 

### O + 0.2

6.041 5.966 6.006 0.988 -0.001 1.720 0.002 6.019 5.966 6.006 0.991 0.002 1.717 -0.001 6.036 5.966 6.006 0.988 -0.001 1.716 -0.002 Averages: 0.989 1.718 Prior Y: 0.991 % Difference: 0.20% + 5%

Review/Approval: Date: BIG BEND UNIT 1 IMPORTANT

IMPORTANT For valid test results, the Actual Vacuum should be 1 to 2 "Hg greater than the Theoretical Critical Vacuum Shown above. The Critical Orifice Coefficient, K', should be in English units.



### Ambient Temperatures Dry Gas Meter Readings Final Tempertures Initial Temperatures

Critical Orifice Readings 

### USEPA Reference Method 5

Dry Gas Meter Calibration

Critical Orifice Method

RJN 03/14/2008 

### POST - TEST CALIBRATION CHECK

18-Mar-08 CALCULATED DATA

For Calibration Y, the ratio of the reading of the calibration orifice to the dry gas meter, acceptable tolerance from average is + 0.02. For Calibration Δ H α , the acceptable tolerance of individual values from the average is + 0.2. 

### Critical Orifice

### Environmental Service s A ir Services Grou p

QUARTERLY NOZZLE CALIBRATIONS Shared Resource STEEL NOZZLE SET Calibration Date: 02/01/2008 Responsible Party: RJN

Nozzle Nozzle Diameter, D n Maximum 

### (cm) Average
I.D. D 1 

### D 2 

### D 3 Difference, " 

### D n 

### , inches
^SN01 0.292 0.286 0.293 0.003 0.114 ^SN04 0.322 0.323 0.323 0.000 0.127 ^SN05 0.379 0.380 0.378 0.001 0.149 ^SN06 0.494 0.496 0.499 0.002 0.195 ^SN09 0.686 0.689 0.686 0.001 0.270 ^SN10 0.754 0.750 0.750 0.002 0.296 ^SN12 0.985 0.979 0.982 0.002 0.387 ^SN15 0.419 0.416 0.414 0.002 0.164 ^SN16 0.501 0.501 0.499 0.001 0.197 ^SN19 0.711 0.706 0.712 0.002 0.279 ^SN22 0.934 0.935 0.932 0.001 0.368 ^SN30 0.792 0.792 0.794 0.001 0.312 ^SN36 0.467 0.474 0.473 0.003 0.186 ^SN37 0.527 0.530 0.533 0.002 0.209 ^SN38 0.628 0.632 0.633 0.002 0.248 ^SN46 0.479 0.479 0.478 0.000 0.188 ^SN47 0.514 0.511 0.508 0.002 0.201 ^SN48 0.636 0.638 0.634 0.002 0.250 ^SN50 0.788 0.784 0.784 0.002 0.309 ^SN58 0.610 0.616 0.618 0.003 0.242 ^SN68 0.622 0.625 0.625 0.001 0.246 ^SN69 0.950 0.950 0.951 0.000 0.374 ^SN70 1.561 1.558 1.553 0.003 0.613 ^SN71 1.554 1.557 1.555 0.001 0.612 ^SN72 0.953 0.954 0.950 0.002 0.375 ^SN73 1.280 1.280 1.280 0.000 0.504 ^SN74 1.230 1.231 1.230 0.000 0.484 Data Notations: All micometer readings are converted from cm to inches by multiplying by 0.393700787. Maximum Difference must be < 0.004".



### QA/QC Review by:

### Environmental Service s A ir Services Grou p

POST TEST NOZZLE CALIBRATION Shared Resource Calibration Date: 03/14/2008 

### Calibration Personnel: SEG 

### Test Designation: BIG BEND UNIT 1



### Nozzle Nozzle Diameter, D n Maximum 

### (in) Average Identifier D 1 

### D 2 

### D 3 Difference, " 

### D n 

### , inches

SN09 0.684 0.686 0.684 0.002 0.270

Quarterly (pre-test) value for nozzle ID SN09 was 0.270

Difference (Pre-test/Post-test) is: 0.000

QA/QC Review by: Date: 18-Mar-08

### Environmental Services A ir Services Group Pyrometer Calibration Blue Team Pyrometer Under Tes t Pyrometer Number: ^PY09 Labworks Sample # 0 Calibration Date: 02/01/2008

Calibrator Information Calibrator Type/Manufacturer: Hart Scientific Calibrator Serial Number: A OA024 Date of Last Calibration: 04/17/2008 Calibration Personnel (Typed and Signature): SEG - RJN

Calibration Data

Calibration Reference Pyrometer Point Temperature Indication Difference

1 

### 400 400 2 

### 212 212 3 

### 32 32

Reference temperatures must encompass the expected range of measurement. These three points should be ~ 32 degrees, ~212 degrees, and ~ 400 degrees Farenheit. Difference is calculated as follows:

(reference temperature ) – (pyrometer indication )

Qaulity Control Data

Calibration Point Difference

1 

### Fail 2 

### Fail 3 

### Fail

Reviewer: 

### 4-Feb-08Environmental Services Air Services Group

_ _

s PITOT TUBE CALIBRATION DATA SHEET

Pitot Tube ID # PT09 Calibration Date 02/01/2008 Operating Quarter/Year: 1/08 Shared Resource Openings Damaged?

___ Y

__ N Repaired?

___ Y ___ N ___ N/A

Labworks #: 0

Alpha and Beta Angle Determinations Acceptable Limits:

α 1 1.9 degrees Pass Dt 0.48 < Dt > 0.95 cm

α 2 1.1 degrees Pass α < 10 degrees β 1 1.6 degrees Pass ( α 1 measured across top impact openings) β 2 1.8 degrees Pass ( α 2 measured across bottom impact openings) β 1 < 5 degrees (alongside top impact openings) Gamma, Theta, Α
, Ζ
, and W Determination β 2 < 5 degrees (alongside bottom impact openings)

ψ 0.1 degrees Ζ < 0.32 cm ( Α sin ψ )
Α 2.28 cm W < 0.08 cm (Asin ο )
Ζ 0.004 cm Pass Α distance between tips

ο angle of plane on side of pitots

ο 0.3 degrees ψ angle between tips W 0.012 cm Pass

NOTES

All measurements are taken in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods, Method 2, "Determination of stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate (Type S pitot tube)". Measurement details are found in EPA/600/4-77/027b, "Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Stationary Source Specific Methods", sub-section 3.1.1, Procuement of Apparatus and Supplies.

Comments: REMOVABLE

Calibrated by: RJN - SEG

Q uality Assurance Review / Approval:

### Environmental Services Air Services Group

BAROMETER CALIBRATION Blue Team Instrument Number: ^BR06 Calibration Date: 02/01/2008 Calibration Personnel: SEG Labworks #: Barometer Readin g Reference Readin g Difference T ime Inches Mercury Inches Mercury "H g 9:00 30.18 30.14 0.04 10:00 30.19 30.16 0.03 11:00 30.2 30.16 0.04

Avera g e Difference: 0.036667

Note: Barometric readin g s must a g ree within ± 0.1 "H g

. Current Reference is National Weather Service, TIA. Current Conditions at Tampa International Airport Comments (Note any ad j ustments):

QA/QC Review by: Date: 4-Feb-08

## APPENDIX H

CHAIN OF CUSTODY

## APPENDIX I

TEST PARTICIPANTS

## TEST PARTICIPANTS

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AIR SERVICES GROUP Test Team Jorge Varino Environmental Technician, Test Team Lead
Scott Given Associate Technician Gary Barber Associate Technician Ryan Newell Associate Technician
Process Data
Karen Zwolak Senior Environmental Consultant – Big Bend Station Sample Analysis Samraing Soth Environmental Technician
Patrece Jackson Environmental Technician
Ellen Demers Environmental Technician Project Quality Objectives & Reporting Ray McDarby Senior Environmental Technician
BIG BEND STATION Test Coordination Karen Zwolak Senior Environmental Consultant – Big Bend Station David A. Smith Coordinator – Air Services Group Byron Burrows Manager – Air Programs