alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
March 18, 2010 Me Clint Jones or Mr. Phil Ford Federal Aviation Administration Transport Aircraft Directorate, ANM-100 1601 Lind Avenue, SW Renton, WA 98057-3356 SA392NE Single AC Config PETITION FOR EXEMPTION
The Leading Edge Group, LLC (LEG) as FAA Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) holder of SA392NE requests FAR compliance relief and submits this Petition for Exemption (PIE) to FAA rule making established under 14 CFR Sect. 26.47(c) 

### & (e)(2). LEG petitions the US Govt. for engineering task relief on a Single Configuration of SA392NE for (1) 8727-100 aircraft, SN 20489 with LEG/pats Auxiliary Fuel System (AFS) in derelict operating condition.

1 This SN has been scrapped.

AS> 

## IO"3jf'-I~(fJ. FAA 

## (!j. 51'1J"i U.;r:' 

# '-'tYI

# ® rN~GE GROUP, LLC Sincerely, 

### ~EA Capt '.... evring, Managing Director AirSpeed &---"

MJin

### ofli"ce 3425Can1lon Point Kirkbnd Wqshingfon98053 MJin (425)576-4030

### ASE 100325-12 FRPE PUBUC COMMENT www.airspeed.us.com



### March 25, 2010 

### Federal Register Petition for Exemption submittal for publiccomment: The Leading Edge Group, LLC(LEG), as FAASupplemental Type Certificate (STC) holder of SA392NE requests FARcompliance relief and submits this Petition for Exemption (P/E) to FAArule making established under 14 CFRSect. 26.47(c) & (e)(2). 

### LEGpetitions for US Govt. engineering task relief on a singletank Configuration of SA392NE for B727-100 series aircraft, with LEG/pats Auxiliary Fuei System (AFS) in VIP passenger cabin (LOPA) deck plans. Boeing SNs20489: 

### 1.This SN isthe only aircraft SN listedwith the above STC installed. 2. This SN has been scrapped.

Thank you. KarlSeuring, Managing Director The Leading Edge Group, LLC Kirkland, WA 98033

Corpot:Jfe

### office 3425 Can1lonPoint Kitkhnd W:Jshington98033 MJin (425) 576-4030
12/23/2015

Operator’s Name and Address: Sable Park Photography – 2602 Cochise Trail, Fitchburg Wi, 53711

Petition for Section 333 civil certificate of waiver or Authorization for civil aircraft to perform 

commercial operations in low-risk, controlled environments. 

The UAV will be flown at altitudes less than 400 feet . This exemption will allow Sable Park Photography

to photograph and film from heights below 400 feet without having to erect ladders and other rigging. 

Using a UAV, will be safer for both clients and photographer, as the chance for toppling ladders or other 

rigging will be eliminated.

The UAV will be operated for aerial photography and cinematography and commercial marketing.

The UAV is a DJI Phantom 3 Pro registration number: FA3RY7EEKF
#### NOLAN, Exrx v KROLL

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist, Erie Co

No 339.

Decided Sept. 19, 1930

H. L. Peeke, Sandusky, for Nolan.

King, Ramsey & Flynn, Sandusky, for Kroll.

LLOYD, J.

Funeral expenses are not, strictly speaking, debts of an estate, but the law humanely declares that the administrator or executor shall be obliged to pay them to the extent that the same are reasonable and there are .assets of the estate in his possession for administration. Whatever the law may be in other jurisdictions, in Ohio, real estate of a decedent descends directly to his heirs or devisees and is not assets of the estate to be administered by the executor or administrator except, that when “the personal estate in his hands will not pay all the debts of the deceased, with the allowance to support the widow and children for twelve months, and the charges of administering the-estate”, he is authorized by 10774, et seq., GC., to proceed to sell same and by 10809 GC, is directed as to the manner of the application and distribution of the proceeds of the sale. This section reads:

> “The money arising from the sale of real estate shall be applied as follows:

> 1. To discharge the costs and expenses of the sale, and the percent and charges of the executor or administrator thereon, for his administration.

> 2. To the payment of mortgages and judgments against the deceased, according to their respective priorities of lien, so far as they operated as a lien on the esate at the time of his death; which shall be apportioned and determined by the court, on reference to a master or otherwise.

> 3. To the discharge of claims and debts, in the order mentioned in this title.”

It seems to us that language could not well be more explicit. It is evident that the words “to the discharge of claims and debts in the order mentioned in this title” refers to debts and to the order of payment specified in 10714 GC. These two sections appear in Title III of the code and obviously must be construed together and, so construed, particularly and definitely determine for the administrator or executor how he shall proceed in the payment of debts of an estate in process of administration.

We have examined not all, but many of the authorities cited by plaintiff in error but do not find them applicable to the administration of estates in Ohio. The statutes of this state are in our judgment unequivocal in terms and must govern.

The judgment of the court of common pleas is therefore affirmed.

Williams and Richards, JJ, concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SunCoast Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John T. Stafford, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                                        
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 11, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ John T. Stafford                                   
|                      |  |     |  | John T. Stafford, President and Chief Executive Officer
# EUR-Lex - 32000R2038 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R2038

**Regulation (EC) No 2038/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 September 2000 amending Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 on substances that deplete the ozone layer, as regards metered dose inhalers and medical drug pumps **

*
Official Journal L 244 , 29/09/2000 P. 0025 - 0025 *

Regulation (EC) No 2038/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council

of 28 September 2000

amending Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 on substances that deplete the ozone layer, as regards metered dose inhalers and medical drug pumps

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE SOCIAL COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 175(1) thereof,

Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(1),

After consulting the Committee of the Regions,

Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty(2),

Whereas:

(1) Exports of metered dose inhalers to developing countries and exports of medical drug pumps containing chlorofluorocarbons are not allowed under Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on substances that deplete the ozone layer(3). However, the export of these health products, the use of which is permitted in the Community market, should not be restricted.

(2) Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 should, therefore, be amended accordingly,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The following point shall be added to Article 11(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000:

"(f) metered dose inhalers and delivery mechanisms containing chlorofluorcarbons for hermetically sealed devices for implantation in the human body for delivery of measured doses of medication which, under Article 4(1), may be given a temporary authorisation in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 18(2)."

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 September 2000.

For the European Parliament

The President

N. Fontaine

For the Council

The President

P. Moscovici

(1) Opinion given on 20 September 2000 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(2) Opinion of the European Parliament of 7 September 2000 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and Council of 28 September 2000.

(3) See page 1 of this Official Journal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF IASIS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,345
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  183,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                    37,691
<INVENTORY>                                     19,729
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               198,281
<PP&E>                                         646,295
<DEPRECIATION>                                 216,355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 877,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,121
<BONDS>                                        549,513
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          182,652
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   877,055
<SALES>                                        618,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               618,279
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  517,814
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,730
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                44,378
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,577
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,528
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,853
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,675
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,675
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      13,417,467              10,074,856
<SECURITIES>                               236,014,844             211,980,452
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,000,000              24,543,070
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           330,180,460             289,066,614
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             330,180,460             289,066,614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      225,637,739             197,978,744
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       104,158                 104,158
<OTHER-SE>                                 104,438,563              90,983,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               330,180,460             289,066,614
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,473,849               6,323,328
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,761,652                 617,607
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,920,648               2,972,809
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,142,589             (2,128,192)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,142,589             (2,128,192)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.68                  (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.68                  (0.39)


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Calvin Fonville, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 902]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Demakos, J.), rendered June 29, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. This *562appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and statements allegedly made by him to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and statements made by him to law enforcement officials. The arresting police officer had probable cause to arrest the defendant based upon his observations and subsequent inquiries *(see, People v Hollman,*79 NY2d 181; *Matter of Darnel B.,*248 AD2d 464; *People v Rodriguez,*159 AD2d 201; *see also, People v Bigelow,*66 NY2d 417; *People v Brown,*246 AD2d 603).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.
Muldoon, Albert (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

To whom it may concern: 

Lindsay Givens <lgivens@arkansas.net> 

Tuesday, June 18, 2013 1:24 PM 

EAS (OST) 

Essential Air Service - Arkansas 

·~ ~ ' 

;: ""~ 

I was very pleased with the customer service of Seaport Airlines last summer when I flew with them from El 

Dorado, Arkansas to Dallas. The plane was on time, and the crew was very courteous. I am planning to use 

them again later this summer. I strongly urge you to renew their Essential Air Service Contract. 

Sincerely, 

Lindsay Givens 

MeN eil, Arkansas 

1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 99 (Monday, May 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 32095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12811]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1327-DR]


Kansas; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for the State of Kansas (FEMA-1327-DR), dated May 3, 2000, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 11, 2000

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Kansas is hereby amended to include the Public Assistance program 
for the following areas among those areas determined to have been 
adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the 
President in his declaration of May 3, 2000:
    Labette and Neosho Counties for Public Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, 
Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, 
Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 00-12811 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
§ 22.30 The hearing and burden of proof. ( a ) The ALJ shall conduct a hearing on the record in order to determine whether the defendant is liable for a civil penalty or assessment under § 22.3 and, if so, the appropriate amount of any such civil penalty or assessment considering any aggravating or mitigating factors.
( b ) The authority shall prove defendant's liability and any aggravating factors by a preponderance of the evidence.
( c ) The defendant shall prove any affirmative defenses and any mitigating factors by a preponderance of the evidence.
( d ) The hearing shall be open to the public unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ for good cause shown.
# Uradni list C 184A/17.

| | ISSN 1725-5244 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 184A |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Zvezek 4717. julij 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5244

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 184A

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Zvezek 4717. julij 2004

---

| Obvestilo št. | Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Objave |
| | Svet |
| 2004/C 184A/1 | | 1 |

Obvestilo št.

Vsebina

Stran

III   Objave

Svet

2004/C 184A/1

1

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

III Objave

Svet

| 17.7.2004 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | CA 184/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2004

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

CA 184/1

---

RAZPIS PROSTEGA DELOVNEGA MESTA

(Sklic A/014)

GENERALNI DIREKTOR

(2004/C 184 A/01)

Generalni sekretariat Sveta Evropske unije želi zaposliti generalnega direktorja v Generalnem direktoriatu H - pravosodje in notranje zadeve.

Dodatne informacije (v angleškem in francoskem jeziku) ter obrazci za prijavo so na voljo pri službi za izbor in zaposlovanje osebja na elektronskem naslovu service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int ali na spletni strani na naslovu http://ue.eu.int/concours.

Rok za oddajo vlog: 3. september 2004, pri čemer se upošteva datum poštnega žiga.

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6151

LEONARD CARTER, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. TRACY S. RAY, Warden; A. MACK BAILEY, Assistant Warden; TERESA L. BRICKHEAD, Operation Manager; REBECCA OWENS, Correctional Institutional Recorded Counselor; GEARD PUGH, Unit Manager; W. ROLLINS, Unit Manager; ROBYN P. WALLACE, EBP Manager; J. MILLES, Unit Manager; B. T. PERKINS, Unit Manager; A. JAMES, Institutional Ombudsman/Grievance; MS. MOE WILLIS, Assistant W arden; MS. K. MITCHELL, Operation Manager , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:17

- cv
- 00608

- HEH

- RCY )

Submitted : May 17 , 2018 Decided: May 21, 2018

Before KING and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Leonard Carter, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circu it.2 PER CURIAM: Leonard Carter, Jr., appeals the district court’s order d ismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failure to prosecute . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated b y the district court.
Carter v . Ray , No. 3:17

- cv
- 00608

- HEH

- RCY (E.D. Va., Jan

. 23 & 24, 2018). We deny Carter’s motion for default judgment and to proceed in forma pauperis and his motion for a writ of execution and to proceed in forma pauperis . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### 579 Flatbush Avenue Realty Corporation, Respondent, *v.*Rosruth Realty Corporation, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

Submitted June 7, 1937;

decided June 11, 1937.

*Irwin N. Wilpon*for motion.

*Clarence B. Campbell*and *Robert L. Callahan*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See *Gallagher*v. *Perot,*203 App. Div. 651; 235 N. Y. 561.)
#### MINERVA DAVIS v IRA DAVIS

Ohio Appeals, 4th Dist, Brown Co

Decided December 12, 1929

Mr. O. E. Young, Georgetown, for Minerva Davis.

Mr. H. S. Pulse, Lynchburg, for Ira Davis.

MAUCK, J.

We assume that the conservator has complied with the statutes enabling him to bring an action in the courts of this state, but we are unaware of any authority for us to determine the important question raised by this motion in the summary method proposed. The plaintiff cites in support of our jurisdiction to act upon the motion Section 11705 GC., but a reading of that section develops that neither its letter nor spirit applies to the facts before' us. Something is said in the case of Wilson vs. Stilwell, 14 OS. 464, that indicates that a court has power to protect itself against an unauthorized release of its judgment, but an examination of that case shows that the party making the release was only a nominal party, that the real parties in interest were before the court, and that the court had full knowledge of the rights of all the parties including the lack of power in the plaintiff in that case to. release the judgment. In the case at bar the plaintiff could, if competent, release the decree rendered in her favor. In the case cited there was no legal right .to release the judgment and in the instant case the sole question is whether or not the judgment creditor had the capacity to make such release. If this release is absolutely void the conservator may proceed to realize upon the decree. If it is voidable only he will have to resort to a direct action to set it aside.

The motion of the defendant is sustained.

Middleton, PJ., and Blosser, J., concur.