alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Purchasing Contract








Purchasing Contract

Party A: (Supplier) Heilongjiang Jianye New Energy Clean Fuel Marketing Co., Ltd

Party B: (Receiver) Maoming Gangan Petrochemical Co., Ltd




 With the principle of equity and honesy, the two parties entered into the contract according to the contract law of People’s Republic of China and ralevant terms.

	I.


Name of the product and plant, quantity, amount, delivery time (Note: Payment will be settled by the actual delivery amount):


							
	Name of the product

	Specification

	Quantity

	Price

(RMB)

	Delivery Add

	Total amount

	Delivery time


	Vehicle Ethanol Fuel

	93#

	2800

	6400

	Receiver’s Shuidong Oil Depot

	17920000

	Before Oct 30, 2009


	Total amount in writing

	Seventeen Million Nine Hundred and Twenty Thousand (The price are all before the tax)

	17920000




	II.


Delivery time and address: Receiver’s Shuidong Oil Depot.

	III.


Means of Transportation: Receiver’s duty

	IV.


Quality of the goods: According to the national standards

	V.


Receipt: Supplier will issue the receipt to the receiver within a month after supplier got the payment.

	VI.


Package: In bulk

	VII.


Inspection standard and inspection method: Inspect based on the national standards.

	VIII.


Payment: Within 3 days after receive the goods

	IX.


term of validity: From Oct 5 2009 to Oct 30

	X.


Breach and dispute settlement: after the contract entered into effect, any party should not cancel or change the contract on the own will. If any dispute exists, should be negociated first, and then be suited to court according to the contract law. 

	XI.


Others: Two copies of the contract, either party holds one. The contract will come into effect after sealed. The copy version will have the same legal effect.




Supplier: Heilongjiang Jianye New Energy Clean Fuel Marketing Co., Ltd

Seal:

Representative:

Address: No. 68, Hegu Sreet, Daoli District, Harbin

Tel: 0451-82658227

Bank:

Account No.:

Postal Code:




Receiver: Maoming Gangan Petrochemical Co., Ltd

Seal:

Representative:

Address: Fl 7, No. 8, Wenguanger Street, Guanghua South Road, Maoming

Tel: 0668-2830858




















Bank: Guangdong Development Bank Maoming Branch Zhaoyang subbranch

Account No.:124202518010000793

Postal Code:525000




It was signed on Oct 5, 2009 in Maoming
Exhibit 10.1


 


David Wimberly


2910 Kerry Forest
Parkway

Tallahasse, FL 32309


 


 April 1, 2015


 


Western Graphite Inc.


1045 East Washington
Street Monticello,

FL 32344


 


To the Board of Directors of Western Graphite
Inc.:


 


On this
date, I, David
Wimberly, hereby tender
my resignation from
my duties and
positions as an officer and director of Western Graphite Inc.
(the "Company"), including, but not limited to, as Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company. My resignation is effective
immediately.


 


Upon your delivery of this signed resignation
to the Company or its representatives, the Company  will


 


(i)Issue you a payment of three thousand
dollars ($3,000)


 


(ii)Instruct the transfer agent to transfer
to you six million (6,000,000) of the Company's common stock held
by Guelph Partners
(with the balance
of the shares
being cancelled and
for which you may
have to sign certain documents required by the transfer agent)


 


(iii)Issue to you a note for services rendered
for sixteen thousand dollars ($16,000) that is due six months from the date it is
issued.


 


	Sincerely,	 
	 	 
	/s/ David Wimberly	 
	David Wimberly
EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Public Accountant

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports dated February 26, 1999, included in the company's 1998 Annual Report to
Stockholders  and  incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K and on page 27 of
this Form 10-K, into the company's  previously filed Registration  Statements on
Form  S-8  File  Nos.  33-24274,  33-50949  and  333-28235,  and  the  company's
previously  filed  Registration  Statements  on Form S-3 File Nos.  33-5473  and
33-66112.



                                                     (ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP)
                                                      ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Oklahoma City, Oklahoma,
    March 30, 1999
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16I0152. AMERICAN SAFETY INDEMNITY COMPANY v. STO CORP.

Sto Corp. filed an action against American Safety Indemnity Company,

alleging, inter alia, breach of contract and bad faith, and seeking a declaratory

judgmentregarding insurance coverage. The partiesfiled cross motionsfor summary

judgment. On February 11, 2016, the trial court entered an order granting Sto Corp.’s

motions and denying American Safety’s motion. American Safety filed a notice of

appeal on February 19, 2016, and this application for interlocutory review on

February 29, 2016. 

As recognized by American Safety, the grant of partial summary judgment as

to one or more but fewer than all the claims or parties may be directly appealed. See

OCGA § 9-11-56 (h); Olympic Dev. Group, Inc. v. American Druggists’ Ins. Co., 175

Ga. App. 425 (1) (333 SE2d 622) (1985). Accordingly, the order in this case is

subject to direct appeal. Moreover, all rulings within that order and any other nonfinal rulings entered in the case may also be raised as part of such a direct appeal. See

OCGA § 5-6-34 (d); Southeast Ceramics v. Klem, 246 Ga. 294, 295 (1) (271 SE2d

199) (1980). “ThisCourt will grant a timely application for interlocutory review if the

order complained of is subject to direct appeal and the applicants have not otherwise

filed a notice of appeal.” Spivey v. Hembree, 268 Ga. App. 485, 486, n. 1 (602 SE2d

246) (2004). Here, however, American Safety asserts in its application that it filed

such notice of appeal. This application is thus superfluous and is DISMISSED.

March 28, 2016
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/28/2016
[No. 28227-5-II.

Division Two.

December 20, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Eric Raster, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clallam County, No. 00-1-00073-1, Kenneth D. Williams, J., entered December 20, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Quinn-Brintnall, A.C. J., and Seinfeld, J.
# EUR-Lex - 31997R1024 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31997R1024

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1024/97 of 6 June 1997 fixing the storage aid for unprocessed dried grapes and dried figs from the 1996/97 marketing year **

*
Official Journal L 150 , 07/06/1997 P. 0018 - 0019 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1024/97 of 6 June 1997 fixing the storage aid for unprocessed dried grapes and dried figs from the 1996/97 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 426/86 of 24 February 1986 on the common organization of the market in products processed from fruit and vegetables (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 (2), and in particular Article 8 (8) thereof,

Whereas Article 1 (1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 627/85 of 12 March 1985 on storage aid and financial compensation for unprocessed dried grapes and figs (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1922/95 (4), provides that storage aid shall be fixed per day and per 100 kilograms net of sultanas of category 4 and figs of category C; whereas paragraph 2 of the same Article provides that one rate of storage aid for dried grapes shall apply until the end of February of the year following that in which the products were bought and another rate shall apply to storage beyond that period;

Whereas the storage aid shall be calculated taking into consideration the technical cost of storage and the financing of the purchase price paid for the products;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Products Processed from Fruit and Vegetables,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The storage aid referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EEC) No 627/85 shall, for products from the 1996/97 marketing year, be as set out in the Annex.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 June 1997.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 49, 27. 2. 1986, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 297, 21. 11. 1996, p. 29.

(3) OJ No L 72, 13. 3. 1985, p. 17.

(4) OJ No L 185, 4. 8. 1995, p. 19.

ANNEX

STORAGE AID FOR UNPROCESSED DRIED GRAPES AND DRIED FIGS FROM THE 1996/97 MARKETING YEAR

A. DRIED GRAPES

>TABLE>

B. DRIED FIGS

>TABLE>
# Uradni list C 171/1. j

| | ISSN 1725-5244 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 171 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Zvezek 471. julij 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5244

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 171

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Zvezek 471. julij 2004

---

| Obvestilo št. | Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Informacija |
| | Komisija |
| 2004/C 171/1 | Menjalni tečaji evra | 1 |

Obvestilo št.

Vsebina

Stran

I   Informacija

Komisija

2004/C 171/1

Menjalni tečaji evra

1

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

I Informacija

Komisija

| 1.7.2004 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | C 171/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2004

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

C 171/1

---

Menjalni tečaji evra (1)

30. junija 2004

(2004/C 171/01)

1 euro=

| | Valuta | Menjalni tečaj |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | ameriški dolar | 1,2155 |
| JPY | japonski jen | 132,40 |
| DKK | danska krona | 7,4326 |
| GBP | funt šterling | 0,67075 |
| SEK | švedska krona | 9,1451 |
| CHF | švicarski frank | 1,5242 |
| ISK | islandska krona | 88,33 |
| NOK | norveška krona | 8,4365 |
| BGN | lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | ciprski funt | 0,58150 |
| CZK | češka krona | 31,755 |
| EEK | estonska krona | 15,6466 |
| HUF | madžarski forint | 251,60 |
| LTL | litovski litas | 3,4529 |
| LVL | latvijski lats | 0,6570 |
| MTL | malteška lira | 0,4263 |
| PLN | poljski zlot | 4,5236 |
| ROL | romunski leu | 40 626 |
| SIT | slovenski tolar | 239,9900 |
| SKK | slovaška krona | 39,875 |
| TRL | turška lira | 1 805 300 |
| AUD | avstralski dolar | 1,7554 |
| CAD | kanadski dolar | 1,6343 |
| HKD | hongkonški dolar | 9,4803 |
| NZD | novozelandski dolar | 1,9210 |
| SGD | singapurski dolar | 2,0901 |
| KRW | junokorejski won | 1 404,45 |
| ZAR | junoafriški rand | 7,6177 |

Valuta

Menjalni tečaj

USD

ameriški dolar

1,2155

JPY

japonski jen

132,40

DKK

danska krona

7,4326

GBP

funt šterling

0,67075

SEK

švedska krona

9,1451

CHF

švicarski frank

1,5242

ISK

islandska krona

88,33

NOK

norveška krona

8,4365

BGN

lev

1,9559

CYP

ciprski funt

0,58150

CZK

češka krona

31,755

EEK

estonska krona

15,6466

HUF

madžarski forint

251,60

LTL

litovski litas

3,4529

LVL

latvijski lats

0,6570

MTL

malteška lira

0,4263

PLN

poljski zlot

4,5236

ROL

romunski leu

40 626

SIT

slovenski tolar

239,9900

SKK

slovaška krona

39,875

TRL

turška lira

1 805 300

AUD

avstralski dolar

1,7554

CAD

kanadski dolar

1,6343

HKD

hongkonški dolar

9,4803

NZD

novozelandski dolar

1,9210

SGD

singapurski dolar

2,0901

KRW

junokorejski won

1 404,45

ZAR

junoafriški rand

7,6177

---

(1)

Vir: referenčni menjalni tečaj, ki ga objavlja ECB.

---
PUBLIC LAW 110–70—AUG. 9, 2007 121 STAT. 719 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2309: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

July 30, considered and passed House. 

Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–70 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3916 Milgen 

Road in Columbus, Georgia, as the ‘‘Frank G. Lumpkin, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. FRANK G. LUMPKIN, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 3916 Milgen Road in Columbus, Georgia, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Frank G. Lumpkin, Jr. Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Frank G. Lumpkin, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Approved August 9, 2007. 

Aug. 9, 2007 

[H.R. 2309]
p. 1



# OAR Box 

# 1787 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 66 ) ll-C-2 4 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/200810:22:19 AM

Sheet 66 of 147P. 2

* • i UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y WASHINGTON . D.C . 2046 0



## NO V1 8 

## 199 3 OFFIC E O F AI R AN O RAOIATIO N 

# *.H< & 7 1 Rober t E . Gilber t Jame s Rive r Corporatio n Corporat e Environmenta l Services-Wes t 90 4 N.W . Drak e Stree t Camas , W

A98607-199 9 Dariu s S . Roger s Jame s Rive r Corporatio n Communicatio n Papers/Wauna Mil l Rt . 2 Bo x 218 5 Clatskanie , O R 9701 6 Dea r Msrs . Gilber t an d Rogers , On behal f o f th e Environmenta l Protectio n Agency' s NewSourc e Review Workgrou

p members , I a

mwriting t o than

k yo u fo r meeting wit hu s on Septembe r 29 , 1993 . W e greatl yappreciat e th e time yo u took t o answe r our question s and t o assis t u s i n understanding some o f th e aspect s o f you r ai r permi t an

d facilityoperations . A s w e explaine d t o you , our effort s ar e du e t o Ne wSourc e ReviewRefor m effort s o f th e Agency . An.NS R Refor mmeetin g wit hindustr yrepresentatives , States , environmenta l representatives , an d othe r federa l agencie s wa s schedule d fo r Novembe r 8 an d 9 . Th e meetin g wa s hel d an d th e material s hande d ou t fo r discussio n ar e availabl e i n th e publi c docke t a s wil l b e document s prepare d coming ou t o f th e meeting . W e will , however , b e sendin g yo u th e material s fo r thi s meeting a s a courtes yi n appreciatio n fo r the courtes yyo u extende d t o us . Th e nex t meeting o f thi s grou p ma yb e schedule d fo r two day s in th e wee k o f Januar

y17 , 1994 . Material s fo r tha t meeting wil l als o b e availabl e i n th e publi c docke t an d o n th e Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlanning an d Standards ' Technolog yTransfe r Networ k (OAQPS ' TTN) . I f yo u have an

yquestion s regarding thes e meetings , the materials , o r th e NS R Refor

m effort s yo u ma

ycal l m e a t (703 ) 308-870 9 o r Larr yElmor e at (919 ) 541-5433 . Larr ywil l b e sendin

g yo u th e copie s o f the material s fro m th e Novembe r 8 an

d 9 meeting . Sincerely , rJxt-tlj

Clar a Poffenberger , Stationar

ySourc e Complianc e Divisio n Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlanning an d Standard s

cc : Larr

yElmore , OAQP S Bil l Lamason , OAQP S Bil l Tyndall , OPA

R Mar k Kataoka , OGC (J_y Recycled/Recyclabl e f\ 7\ Pt1nt»« J wtt h Soy/Canol a In k

o n pape rtha t \r—i^-* '- ' •'—-••t- —"•• —
§ 1690.306 Formal submission in absence of consultation. If an initiating agency has an issuance which was already under development on or before July 1, 1978, when Executive Order 12067 became effective, and on which there has been no consultation, the agency shall immediately notify the EEOC of the existence of such proposals and the following procedure shall apply: ( a ) EEOC shall confer with the initiating agency and shall determine whether the proposal should be the subject of informal consultation and/or formal submission to other affected Federal agencies pursuant to section 1-304 of the Order. This does not preclude the right of the agency to consult with any other agency it wishes.
( b ) If the EEOC decides that informal consultation and/or formal submission is necessary, it shall confer with the proposing agency and agree on a mutually acceptable length of time for one or both (the informal consultation and/or formal submission).
( c ) The period of formal submission shall be sufficient to allow all affected agencies time in which to properly review the proposal. While such period may be longer, in no instance may it be shorter than 15 working days.
[No. 49188-1-I.

Division One.

November 25, 2002.]

#### John Citoli, *Appellant,*v. The City of Seattle, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 00-2-07339-9, Richard D. Eadie, J., entered August 15, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kennedy, J., concurred in by Agid and Schindler, JJ. Now published at 115 Wn. App. 459.
#### HESS v AVON CONSTRUCTION CO

Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist, Hamilton Co

No 3500.

Decided Nov. 4, 1929

Harry Hess, Cincinnati, for Hess.

Bolsinger & Black, Cincinnati, for Construction Co.

ROSS, J.

The plaintiff in error complains that the court in its charge to the jury misstated the issues, first, in that the court stated: ‘As the case is shaped up, it is immaterial whether Mr. Hess was acting as broker or attorney.” In view of the fact that no defense was made on the ground that the plaintiff in error, as a broker, had not complied with the license laws applicable to brokers, we are unable to see where such statement constituted prejudicial error. If the statement is subject to criticism at all, it could only be criticized on the basis that it might be considered a comment on the evidence.

The second error in the charge complained of was a misstatement of claim, in that the court stated that the compensation claimed by the defendant in error to have been included in the contract was *134one-fourth of one per cent. In view of the fact that the court elsewhere properly stated the contract, we do not think this of such a character as to constitute prejudicial error.

A third criticism is directed to the language of the charge, where the court states that: “The defense is what we call a confession and avoidance, because the defendant says, in substance, that they had an agreement which was conditional and not absolute and unequivocal with Mr. Hess. They say, we did agree that he could endeavor to get us a loan for a specified amount, $185,000.00 dollars, and if he did that he was to be paid one-fourth of one per cent for his services in so doing.”

It is the contention of the plaintiff in error that this misstates the issue, in that the real issue presented was, whether or not the contract alleged by the plaintiff in error had been entered into and performed by the plaintiff in error, and breached by the defendant in error? The defense was a denial of these issues, and an allegation of surplus matter,, to-wit; the execution of an entirely separate and distinct contract. As we view this matter, we consider that if any prejudice intervened by reason of the statement complained of, it would be prejudicial to the defendant in error rather than to the plaintiff in error, in that the defense was a denial of the contract which tne plaintiff in error alleged, and, under the language of the .charge, the court, in stating the defense was a confession and avoidance, implied an admission on the part of the defendant in error of the contract alleged by the plaintiff in error, and an avoidance thereof by affirmative matter extrinsic thereto.

In addition, the court, we think, taking the charge as a whole, fairly presented the issues to the jury, and a reading of the record convinces us that substantial justice was administered by the verdict and judgment.

Finding no error in the record, prejudicial to the plaintiff in error, the judgment of the court of common pleas is affirmed.

Cushing, PJ., and Hamilton, J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 98 (Friday, May 19, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31823-31827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12340]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

41 CFR Chapter 301

[FTR Amendment 87]
RIN 3090-AH18


Federal Travel Regulation; Maximum Per Diem Rates and Other 
Travel Allowances; Correction

AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide Policy, GSA.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects entries listed in the prescribed 
maximum per diem rates for locations within the continental United 
States

[[Page 31824]]

(CONUS) contained in a final rule appearing in Part III of the Federal 
Register of Thursday, December 2, 1999 (64 FR 67670). The rule, among 
other things, increased/decreased the maximum lodging amounts in 
certain existing per diem localities, added new per diem localities, 
and removed a number of previously designated per diem localities.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joddy P. Garner, Office of 
Governmentwide Policy (MTT), Washington, DC 20405, telephone 202-501-
4857.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In rule document 99-31215 beginning on page 
67670 in the issue of Thursday, December 2, 1999, make the following 
corrections:

Appendix A to Chapter 301 [Corrected]

    1. On page 67674, under the State of Colorado, city of Aspen, the 
seasonal dates, column one and lodging rates, column three are revised 
to read as follows: ``January 1-March 31 $163, April 1-May 31 $68, June 
1-December 31 $140''.
    2. On page 67678, under the State of Louisiana, the names of cities 
of New Orleans/Plaquemine/St. Bernard, column two is revised to read as 
follows: ``Orleans, Iberville, Jefferson Parish and St. Bernard''.

    Pages 67674 and 67678, as corrected, read as follows:

Appendix A to Chapter 301--Prescribed Maximum Per Diem Rates for 
CONUS

* * * * *
BILLING CODE 6820-34-P

[[Page 31825]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR19MY00.000


[[Page 31826]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR19MY00.001



[[Page 31827]]


    Dated: May 11, 2000.
Peggy G. DeProspero,
Acting Director, Travel Management Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 00-12340 Filed 5-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-C