alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In accordance with Department of Justice policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in the action entitled                     *United State of America*                     v.                     *Sapo Corporation, et. al.*, Civil Action No. 99-2366 (D.P.R.), was lodged on December 15, 1999 with the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. The proposed consent decree resolves claims of the United States, on behalf of the Secretary of the Army, under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (“Clean Water Act”), 33 U.S.C. 1251-1387, against defendants Sapo Corporation, Concho Corporation, and Arnold Benus. These claims are for injunctive relief and civil penalties arising from defendants' alleged discharge of fill material into wetlands at the Copamarina Beach Resort in Cana Gorda Ward, Guanica, Puerto Rico, without a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in violation of Section 301(a) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311(a).                

Under the terms of the proposed consent decree, the defendants will (1) Pay a civil penalty of $15,000 to the United States, (2) complete a mitigation project to enhance protection of existing wetlands on their property by constructing barriers to intrusion by motor vehicles, and (3) complete a preservation project by transferring title to 30.59 acres of wetlands valued at $98,126, including the protective barriers, under a perpetual conservation easement, to the Puerto Rico Department of Natural and Environmental Resources.

                    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to                     *United States*                     v.                     *Sapo Corporation, et al.*, Civil Action No. 99-2366 (D.P.R.), DOJ Ref. No. 90-5-1-1-4471/1.                

                    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office of the United States Attorney, Federal Building, Chardon Avenue, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico 00918. A copy may be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, U.S. Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044-7611. In requesting a copy by mail, please refer to the referenced case                     Start Printed Page 3249                    and enclose a check in the amount of $5.75 (25 cents per page reproduction costs for the Decree and appendix) made payable to Consent Decree Library.                

Bruce Gelber,

Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 00-1271 Filed 1-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
[No. 28145-7-II.

Division Two.

December 6, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Lee Richard McClure, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 93-1-00235-3, Frederick W. Fleming, J., entered November 30, 2001. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Seinfeld and Houghton, JJ.
### 170270 PMNX110224312385144 10DT2T

X

X Page 1 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### X

Page 2 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONDiane Thackston Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Associate Goulston Technologies, Inc. 700 N. Johnson Street Monroe NC 28110 dthackston@goulston.com

Diane Thackston Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Associate Goulston Technologies 700 N. Johnson Street Monroe NC 28110 dthackston@goulston.com 704-289-6464 

## X X

X X Page 3 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X

XXX 

## X XXX 

## X 161323 Sanitized IES Attachment.pdf 

### XXX 

## X See Attachment 002 (Sanitized PMN Structure.pdf)

Sanitized PMN Structure.pdf Page 4 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 5 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 6 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 7 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX

XXX alkyl amine salt 

## X X XXX XXX XXX 

### X XXX XXX XXX 

### X XXX XXX XXX 

### X

Page 8 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### XXX XXX 

## X

X Antistatic agent for acrylic yarn XXX 

### X XXX 

### X XXX 

### X 0 0 100 0

Page 9 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 10 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 11 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 12 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 13 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### 1

See Attachment 003 (Customer Carbonization Process.pdf)

Customer Carbonization Process.pdf Customer process for carbon fiber
Page 14 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONP10SB1(a)(4)1 Part II, Section B, 1(a)(4). Operation Site Locations

California

Page 15 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 16 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 17 SANITIZED SUBMISSION001 Sanitized IES Attachment.pdf Sanitized IES Attachment.pdf Pt.I, Sec.B, 1c. 1 002 Sanitized PMN Structure.pdf Sanitized PMN Structure.pdf Pt.I, Sec.B, 1e. 1 003 Customer Carbonization Process.pdf Customer Carbonization Process.pdf Pt.2, Sec.B, 1a. 1 004 PMN MSDS.pdf PMN MSDS.pdf 4

Page 18 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X

XXX 

## X 0.05 Measured XXX 

## X XXX
Page 19 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 001 Attachment Name Sanitized IES Attachment.pdf 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 1c. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number PMNX110224312385144

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 002 Attachment Name Sanitized PMN Structure.pdf 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 1e. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number PMNX110224312385144

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 003 Attachment Name Customer Carbonization Process.pdf 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.2, Sec.B, 1a. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number PMNX110224312385144

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 004 Attachment Name PMN MSDS.pdf 

## Associated PMN Section Number

N/A Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number PMNX110224312385144
#### INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION v WALTON

Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Wayne Co

No 869.

Decided April 29, 1930

Hon. Gilbert Bettman, Attorney General and R. R. Zurmehly, Special Counsel, Co*414lumbus, and Marion F. Graven, Prosecuting Attorney, Wooster, for Commission.

H. R. Smith, Wooster, and Daniel C. Funk, Wooster, for Walton.

WASHBURN, J.

In this case all of such claimed errors depend upon a consideration of the evidence upon which the trial court based its decision, and the bill of exceptions fails to show what evidence was the basis of such decision.

The “evidence” consisted of the transcript showing a record of the evidence taken and proceedings had in the hearing of the application before the commission.

- Said record shows that objections were made by the parties and rulings made by the commission on the admission and rejection of testimony, and it is shown by the bill of exceptions that the parties submitted the case upon such record, and agreed that the trial court “shall discard and not consider such parts as it may deem improper, incompetent or inadmissible where objections have, been interposed, and to make its findings from that part of the evidence which it considers to have been properly admitted in evidence.”

The bill of exceptions further shows that the trial court found the rulings of the commission “in many instances” to be “improperly made” and that the trial court considered evidence that was ruled out by the commission; but the bill of exceptions does not show in what instances the trial court did not follow the rulings of the commission, nor what part of the evidence the trial court considered and based its decision upon.

We do not see how we can determine that the finding of the trial court is manifestly against the weight of “that part of the evidence which it considers to have been properly admitted” without knowing what part the trial court considered properly admitted, and this difficulty applies to all of the claimed errors.

But if we disregard all technical rules and consider the cause upon the evidence we regard as competent, we reach the same conclusion as was reached by the trial court.

Funk, PJ., and Pardee, J., concur.
§ 450.167 Tracking. ( a ) *General.* During the flight of a launch or reentry vehicle, an operator must measure and record in real time the position and velocity of the vehicle. The system used to track the vehicle must provide data to predict the expected impact locations of all stages and components, and to obtain vehicle performance data for comparison with the pre-flight performance predictions.
( b ) *Application requirements.* An applicant must identify and describe each method or system used to meet the tracking requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.
**Overview Briefing for OMB/Interagency Review** EO 12866_111(b) New-Mods 2060-AQ91 Final_20150507

CAA Section 111(b) DRAFT Final Rule Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissio ns from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units

May 14, 2015 3:00 – 4:00 PM

A. Summary Overview 1. Background 2. Proposal 3. Comments

B. Standards for New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stea m Generating Units 1. Applicability 2. Final Standards – New Sources 3. Final Standards – Modified Sources 4. Final Standards – Reconstructed Sources

C. Standards for New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stat ionary Combustion Turbines 1. Applicability 2. Final Standards – New, Modified, and Reconstructed Sources

D. Interactions with Other EPA Programs and Rules 1. PSD Program 2. Title V Program

E. Impacts of the Final Standards of Performance

Attendees: EPA/OAR: N. Hutson, C. Fellner, M. Johnson, L. Chap pell, D. Weatherhead, J. Herring, D. Svendsgaard, K

. Culligan, A. Karimjee, M. DeFigueiredo EPA/OP: B. Elman, M. Roberts EPA/OGC: M. Marks, S. Silverman

Interagency: N. Frey, OMB/OIRA (lead) OMB/OIRA, CEQ, OSTP, SBA, USDA, DOE, Treasury, DOJ, FERC, Interior, HHS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 98 (Friday, May 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12656]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 98 / Friday, May 19, 2000 / Notices

[[Page 31874]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Office of the Secretary


Commission on 21st Century Production Agriculture

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Agriculture.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has established the 
Commission on 21st Century Production Agriculture. In accordance with 
Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), notice 
is hereby given of a meeting in June of the Commission on 21st Century 
Production Agriculture. The purpose of the meeting on June 14-16, 2000 
is a working session, which will be to address issues regarding 
agricultural policy initiatives to be included in the Commission 
report. The meeting is open to the public.

PLACE, DATE, AND TIME OF MEETING: This meeting will be held June 14, 
2000 from 12-5 p.m. EST in Room 108-A, Whitten Building; June 15, 2000 
from 9 a.m.-5 p.m. EST in Room 108-A, Whitten Building; June 16, 2000 
from 9 a.m.-12 EST in Room 221-A, Whitten Building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mickey Paggi on (202-720-3139), 
Director, Commission on 21st Century Production Agriculture, Room 3702 
South Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-
0524.

    Dated: May 15, 2000.
Keith J. Collins,
Chief Economist.
[FR Doc. 00-12656 Filed 5-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM
CONSOLIDATED  CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET OF LILLY INDUSTRIES,  INC. AT NOVEMBER 30,
1998 AND THE  CONSOLIDATED  CONDENSED  STATEMENT OF INCOME OF LILLY  INDUSTRIES,
INC.  FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<CAPTION>
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                     NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                              13,326
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       84,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,981
<INVENTORY>                                         50,796
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   152,032
<PP&E>                                             162,357
<DEPRECIATION>                                      60,189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     516,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              101,961
<BONDS>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                            97,649
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                          67,926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       516,485
<SALES>                                            619,002
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   619,002
<CGS>                                              379,641
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      546,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  16,919
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     54,446
<INCOME-TAX>                                        22,867
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        31,579
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.35
        


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.909 Firing the blast. ( a ) A code of blasting signals equivalent to Table U-1, shall be posted on one or more conspicuous places at the operation, and all employees shall be required to familiarize themselves with the code and conform to it. Danger signs shall be placed at suitable locations.
( b ) Before a blast is fired, a loud warning signal shall be given by the blaster in charge, who has made certain that all surplus explosives are in a safe place and all employees, vehicles, and equipment are at a safe distance, or under sufficient cover.
( c ) Flagmen shall be safely stationed on highways which pass through the danger zone so as to stop traffic during blasting operations.
( d ) It shall be the duty of the blaster to fix the time of blasting.
( e ) Before firing an underground blast, warning shall be given, and all possible entries into the blasting area, and any entrances to any working place where a drift, raise, or other opening is about to hole through, shall be carefully guarded. The blaster shall make sure that all employees are out of the blast area before firing a blast.
Table U-1 Warning Signal—A 1-minute series of long blasts 5 minutes prior to blast signal. Blast Signal—A series of short blasts 1 minute prior to the shot. All Clear Signal—A prolonged blast following the inspection of blast area.
[No. 28014-1-II.

Division Two.

November 14, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. C.D., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 01-8-00866-5, Stephanie A. Arend, J., entered October 4, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, A.C.J., concurred in by Houghton and Bridgewater, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 57 FR 31451, July 16, 1992.

#### § 20.102 Redelegation of authority.

Authority delegated by statute or IRS regulation to the Secretary or Department is redelegated to the heads of the Department's constituent agencies. This authority may be further redelegated as necessary to ensure the efficient implementation of these regulations.
#### § 2560.521-4 Cross-reference.

See 29 CFR 2571.1 through 2571.13 for procedural rules relating to administrative hearings under section 521 of ERISA.

[78 FR 13805, Mar. 1, 2013]
§ 1905.23 Prehearing conferences. ( a ) *Convening a conference.* Upon his own motion or the motion of a party, the hearing examiner may direct the parties or their counsel to meet with him for a conference to consider: ( 1 ) Simplification of the issues;
( 2 ) Necessity or desirability of amendments to documents for purposes of clarification, simplification, or limitation;
( 3 ) Stipulations, admissions of fact, and of contents and authenticity of documents;
( 4 ) Limitation of the number of parties and of expert witnesses; and
( 5 ) Such other matters as may tend to expedite the disposition of the proceeding, and to assure a just conclusion thereof.
( b ) *Record of conference.* The hearing examiner shall make an order which recites the action taken at the conference, the amendments allowed to any documents which have been filed, and the agreements made between the parties as to any of the matters considered, and which limits the issues for hearing to those not disposed of by admissions or agreements; and such order when entered controls the subsequent course of the hearing, unless modified at the hearing, to prevent manifest injustice.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4628 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4628

  To provide for a 1-year extension of the Public-Private Partnership 
               Advisory Council to End Human Trafficking.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 2020

 Mr. Grassley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for a 1-year extension of the Public-Private Partnership 
               Advisory Council to End Human Trafficking.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Human Trafficking Council Extension 
Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP ADVISORY COUNCIL TO END 
              HUMAN TRAFFICKING.

    Section 705 of the Public-Private Partnership Advisory Council to 
End Human Trafficking Act (title VII of Public Law 115-393) is amended 
by striking ``September 30, 2020'' and inserting ``September 30, 
2021''.
                                 <all>
```
#### PEOPLE *v.*DILLON.

Criminal Law — Possession of Narcotics — Lawfulness of Arrest —Searches and Seizures — Reasonableness—Evidence—Constitutional Law.

Defendant’s conviction of the illegal possession of nareoties *held,*proper, regardless of the validity of defendant’s arrest and the reasonableness of the officer’s search which resulted in the seizure of narcotics from defendant, where such search and seizure took place outside the curtilage of a dwelling house, since under the provisions of the State Constitution, the evidence so seized was admissible in evidence against defendant even if the search and seizure were unreasonable (Const 1963, art 1, § 11; CLS 1961, § 335.153).

References for Points in Headnote

29 Am Jur 2d, Evidence § 411 *et seq.*

Modern status of rule governing admissibility of evidence obtained by unlawful search and seizure. 50 ALR2d 531.

Appeal from Oakland; Beer (William John), J.

Submitted Division 2 April 4, 1967, at Lansing.

(Docket No. 784.)

Decided June 27, 1967.

*257Hugh R. Dillon was convicted of the illegal possession of narcotics. Defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

*Frank J. Kelley,*Attorney General, *Robert A. Perengoski,*Solicitor General, *8. Jerome Bronson,*Prosecuting Attorney and *Patrick H. Oliver,*for the people.

*Barry K. Branch,*for defendant.

Quinn, P. J.

July 21,1964, defendant was convicted by jury of possession of narcotics contrary to CLS 1961, § 335.153 (Stat Ann 1957 Rev § 18.1123). and he was sentenced to prison July 31, 1964, for a term of 1 to 10 years. His appeal contests the propriety of the denial of his motion to suppress evidence of narcotics taken from his person at the time of his arrest without a warrant therefor and without a search warrant, and the admission of such evidence at trial.

*People*v. *Monroe*(1966), 3 Mich App 165, requires affirmance and obviates discussion of the lawfulness of defendant’s arrest.

Affirmed.

McGregor and A. C. Miller, JJ., concurred.
# Úradný vestník C 205A/13.

| | ISSN 1725-5236 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 205A |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Zväzok 4713. augusta 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5236

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 205A

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Zväzok 4713. augusta 2004

---

| Číslo oznamu | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Oznámenia |
| | Riadiaca agentúra pre komunitárny program Inteligentná Energia pre Európu |
| 2004/C 205A/1 | Výzva na podávanie žiadostí | 1 |

Číslo oznamu

Obsah

Strana

III   Oznámenia

Riadiaca agentúra pre komunitárny program Inteligentná Energia pre Európu

2004/C 205A/1

Výzva na podávanie žiadostí

1

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

III Oznámenia

Riadiaca agentúra pre komunitárny program Inteligentná Energia pre Európu

| 13.8.2004 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | CA 205/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2004

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

CA 205/1

---

VÝZVA NA PODÁVANIE ŽIADOSTÍ

(2004/C 205 A/01)

Riadiaca agentúra pre komunitárny program Inteligentná Energia pre Európu hľadá kandidátov na obsadenie konkrétnych pozícií. Bližšie informácie o voľných miestach, o poslaní riadiacej agentúry, ako aj o postupe pri podávaní žiadostí nájdete zverejnené na internetovej stránke agentúry: http://europa.eu.int/comm/energy/intelligent/index_en.html.

---