- About NRC           - The Commission
      - Statutory Authority
      - Strategic Plan
      - Budget &  Performance
      - Organization & Functions
      - Locations
      - History
      - Values
      - Policymaking
      - Radiation Protection
      - Fire Protection
      - How We Regulate
      - Grants
      - Civil Rights
      -     
    - NuclearReactors           - Operating Reactor Locations
      - Reactor Quick Links
      - Power Reactors
      - Research and Test Reactors
      - Operating Reactors
      - Operator Licensing
      - New Reactors
      - Operator Licensing for New Reactors
      - Reactor Safety Research
      - Advisory Comm (ACRS)
      - Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities
      -     
    - NuclearMaterials           - Fuel Cycle Facility Locations
      - Uranium Recovery Locations
      - Materials Quick Links
      - Special Nuclear Material
      - Source Material
      - Byproduct Material
      - Med, Academic & Ind Uses
      - Source Materials Facilities
      - Uranium Recovery
      - Fuel Cycle Facilities
      - Materials Transportation
      - Materials Research
      - Advisory Comm (ACMUI)
      - Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities
      - Materials Environmental Reviews
      -     
    - RadioactiveWaste           - Waste Quick Links
      - Low-Level Waste
      - Waste Incidental to Reprocessing
      - Incidental Waste Criteria
      - High-Level Waste
      - Uranium Mill Tailings
      - LLW Disposal
      - HLW Disposal
      - Spent Fuel Storage
      - Spent Fuel Transport
      - Waste Research
      -     
    - NuclearSecurity           - Security Spotlight
      - NRC Responsibilities
      - Domestic Safeguards
      - Radioactive Material Security
      - Facility Protection
      - Nuclear Material Control
      - International Safeguards
      - Information Security
      - Emergency Preparedness
      - &;   
    - Public Meetings& Involvement           - Public Meeting Schedule
      - Commission	    Schedule
      - Conferences & Symposia
      - Documents for Comment
      - Brochures & Fact Sheets
      - Involving Stakeholders
      - Info Quality Guidelines
      - Rulemaking Process
      - Licensing
      - Enforcement
      - Hearing Process
      - Hearing Applications
      -     

**UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001**

February 27, 1998

**Addressees**

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors except those who have ceased operations and have certifiedthat fuel has been permanently removed from the vessel.

**Purpose**

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert addressees to a potentialconcern relating to electric power industry deregulation that could adversely affect the reliability of offsite power sources,i.e., power from the transmission system grid to nuclear power plants. It is expected that recipients will review theinformation for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate. However, suggestions contained inthis information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response to this notice isrequired.

**Description of Circumstances**

On July 11, 1989, safety systems at Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station experienced a sustained degraded voltagecondition and as a result the safety buses were automatically transferred from the offsite power system to onsite standbydiesel generators. The degraded condition was caused by a turbine trip and deficiencies in the offsite power system'stransmission network equipment. The transfer of power supplies was initiated by operation of degraded voltage protectiverelays, as designed. Non-safety system loads remained operable while being powered for approximately 1 hour from thedegraded offsite power source. (LER 50-395/89-012)

On November 5, 1991, the licensee for Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2 reported that, had its 500kV auto-transformer been lost during summer peak conditions, the 161kV system might not have been able to maintain adequatevoltages to support the operation of the safety system loads of both units. (LER 50-313/91-010)

On April 15, 1992, Northeast Nuclear Energy Company reported that under certain operating conditions of thetransmission network (i.e., during heavy load conditions), a failure of transmission system equipment may cause a trip ofall three Millstone units and a loss of offsite power to the station. This operating condition was precipitated by theeconomic displacement of oil-fired generating units by non-utility generators and by the addition of other generatingcapacity (Seabrook and Hydro-Quebec) to the transmission network. (LER 50-245/92-020)

On April 14, 1993, Wisconsin Public Service Corporation reported that under certain transmission line contingencies, apotential existed for the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant grid to become unstable and cause all offsite power sources intothe plant to trip. (Ref: LER 50-305/93-010)

On December 30, 1993, Northeast Nuclear Energy Company reported that under certain operating conditions of thetransmission network (i.e., Millstone Units 2 and 3 off line), the transmission network may not have sufficient capacity topermit the continued operation of safety system loads from offsite sources following a trip of Millstone Unit 1. (LER 50-245/94-001)

On August 8, 1995, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) reported that under certain operating conditions (i.e., ahigh system load with a specific 230kV transmission line out of service), the transmission network may not havesufficient capacity to permit the continued operation of the safety system loads from offsite sources following a trip ofone of the two Diablo Canyon units. (Ref: LER 50-275/95-007)

On August 10, 1996, a transmission line sagged into a tree in Oregon creating a ground fault that progressed into a majorfault on the western interconnection. The subsequent transient resulted in the tripping of both Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and2 (LER 50-275/96-012) and Palo Verde, Units 1 and 3 (LER 50-528/004).

During the summer of 1997, concerns were expressed about the impact of electric peak conditions on the offsite powersources for nuclear power plants located in the Midwest and New England. In addition, the licensee for Clinton nuclearstation sought an exemption from offsite power regulatory requirements because of its analysis that offsite power wouldbecome inadequate under certain summer peak conditions following the loss of the nuclear unit.

Recent NRC inspection findings and Licensee Event Reports have indicated instances when grid stability analyses hadnot been updated by the licensees to reflect changes in the grid power system. Office for Analysis and Evaluation ofOperational Data study C97-01, "Grid Performance Factors" dated March 20, 1997, identified a "need to monitor gridconditions on a regular basis."

**Discussion**

In 1988, NRC issued the station blackout (SBO) rule. The requirements of 10 CFR 50.63, "Loss of All AlternatingCurrent Power," specify that each light-water-cooled nuclear power plant be able to withstand and recover from an SBO(i.e., a loss of offsite and onsite emergency ac power sources) for a specified period. The NRC review of licensees'analyses to assess the vulnerability of offsite power and the time required for recovery indicated that for most nuclearpower plant sites the grid was stable and reliable.

Historically, grid control is decentralized and each utility or a small group of utilities forms a control area containingcustomers for which it is jurisdictionally responsible. The control areas form reliability councils that establish operatingstandards by consensus. These agreements, in turn, became the factors that determine the reliability of the grid and thebases for the availability of the offsite power system. Although the grid operating standards that evolved in the pastprovided reasonable grid reliability, events like those discussed herein reveal vulnerabilities of the electrical grid eitherthrough actual challenges or through licensee's analyses to assess the adequacy of the offsite power system.

The present grid management may be dismantled or restructured by two factors that are emerging: non-utility generationand deregulation. It is anticipated that in the future, power suppliers, whether utilities or independent power producers,will actively compete for sales to customers who may be located anywhere on the power grid. This option createsmultiple combinations of generating units going on and off the grid based on economic and performance relatedconsequences. Regional grid control could be the responsibility of centralized independent system operators (ISOs). Theresponsibilities and authority of an ISO are yet to be defined, but it is expected that the ISO, or a similar entity, will becharged with maintaining grid reliability to facilitate the marketing of power. It is uncertain how the historic mechanismsfor reliable operation will change under the new grid operational structure. The Department of Energy has sponsored aTask Force on Electric System Reliability to examine the implications of industry deregulation on the Nation's electricpower supply.

The capacity and capability of the offsite power system for each nuclear power plant could be significantly influenced bythe decisions emerging from these forthcoming changes. Since the capability of the offsite power cannot be tested exceptwhen challenged in an actual event, the design bases of the offsite power can only be assured through an envelopinganalysis that accounts for the full spectrum of grid loading and transient conditions that support the operability of safetysystems. The NRC Standard Review Plan Section 8.2 provides current guidance for assessing the adequacy of the offsitepower system. It addresses grid analyses that demonstrate acceptable voltage and frequency when subjected to scenariosinvolving loss of nuclear unit generation, loss of the largest other unit, or loss of the most critical transmission line.

Although the above events discussed may not demonstrate present generic weaknesses in licensees' processes, it is vitalthat licensees continue to ensure that the design bases with respect to the reliability and stability of the offsite powersources do not degrade during the life of the nuclear facility. The capacity and capability of the offsite power system fornuclear power plants are important elements to be factored into the management of the changes resulting from industryderegulation.

This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any questions about the information inthis notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear ReactorRegulation (NRR) project manager.

----