alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         June 6, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         7 am to 8 am.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Marriott Hotel, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 20914.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ronald Suddendorf, Phd, Scientific Review Administrator, Extramural Project Review Branch, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Suite 409, 6000 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-7003, 301-443-2926.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 10, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-12533 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
      333-87216 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 27, 2006, relating to
      the financial statements (and with respect to the report on those financial
      statements, expressed an unqualified opinion and included an explanatory
      paragraph concerning the adoption of new accounting pronouncements in 2003
      and
      2004) and financial statement schedule of Kentucky Power Company appearing
      in
      and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kentucky
      Power Company for the year ended December 31, 2005.













/s/
      Deloitte & Touche




Columbus,
      Ohio


February
      28, 2006
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40626 Conference Calendar

JOHNNY OTIS DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus G. PETERSON; GERY GOMEZ; T. THALER; RICHARD LAPOINTE; R. COVARRUBIAS; CAROLYN D. SMITH, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-95-CV-775

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1998 Before DAVIS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Johnny Otis Davis, Texas prisoner No. 236506, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Davis argues that the failure to transcribe prison disciplinary proceedings deprived him of a meaningful administrative appeal and that the defendants have failed to comply with Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ)No. 97-40626 -2- regulations which require the transcription of disciplinary proceedings. The Constitution does not require that a prisoner be provided with a transcript of his disciplinary hearing. Wolff v. McDonnell , 418 U.S. 539, 563-67 (1974). Because Davis does not allege that the disciplinary proceedings violated the procedural requirements set forth in Wolff , his allegation of a violation of TDCJ regulations does not implicate a constitutional violation. See Murphy v. Collins , 26 F.3d 541, 543 (5th Cir. 1994).
AFFIRMED.
#### Cohoes Realty Associates et al., Respondents, v Lexington Insurance Company, Appellant, and Marshall & Sterling Upstate, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff Appellant. New England Risk Specialists, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[698 NYS2d 217]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered February 8, 1999, which granted the motion of plaintiff Lana Realty Co. for renewal of its motion for summary judgment, and, upon renewal, granted plaintiff partial summary judgment against defendant Lexington Insurance Company on its third cause of action, and which granted the cross motion of third-party defendant New England Risk Specialists, Inc. (NERS) to dismiss the third-party complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion and cross motion both denied and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

It was an improvident exercise of Trial Term’s discretion to grant renewal where this Court had affirmed its previous denial of summary judgment to plaintiffs and, upon a search of the record, granted summary judgment in favor of Lexington (250 AD2d 420, *lv dismissed*92 NY2d 1001), particularly where plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a justifiable excuse for not pursuing discovery against NERS more expeditiously *(see, Matter of Beiny,*132 AD2d 190, 209-210, *lv dismissed*71 NY2d 994). Since the grant of summary judgment to plaintiff was the sole basis for dismissing the third-party action, such dismissal is vacated and the third-party action reinstated.

Reargument granted and upon reargument, the unpublished decision and order of this Court entered on July 15, 1999 (Appeal No. 1568) is recalled and vacated and a new decision and order substituted therefor, and motion otherwise denied. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Wallach and Andrias, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1926

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.58 COVID-19.

The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at 29 CFR 1910.501 subpart U.

[86 FR 61555, Nov. 5, 2021]
§ 1978.100 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part sets forth, the procedures for, and interpretations of, the employee protection (whistleblower) provision of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (STAA), 49 U.S.C. 31105, as amended, which protects employees from retaliation because the employee has engaged in, or is perceived to have engaged in, protected activity pertaining to commercial motor vehicle safety, health, or security matters.
( b ) This part establishes procedures under STAA for the expeditious handling of retaliation complaints filed by employees, or by persons acting on their behalf. These rules, together with those rules codified at 29 CFR part 18, set forth the procedures for submission of complaints, investigations, issuance of findings and preliminary orders, objections to findings and orders, litigation before administrative law judges (ALJs), post-hearing administrative review, and withdrawals and settlements. This part also sets forth interpretations of STAA.
§ 1620.33 Recovery of wages due; injunctions; penalties for willful violations. ( a ) Wages withheld in violation of the Act have the status of unpaid minimum wages or unpaid overtime compensation under the FLSA. This is true both of the additional wages required by the Act to be paid to an employee to meet the equal pay standard, and of any wages that the employer should have paid an employee whose wages he reduced in violation of the Act in an attempt to equalize his or her pay with that of an employee of the opposite sex performing equal work, on jobs subject to the Act.
( b ) The following methods are provided under sections 16 and 17 of the FLSA for recovery of unpaid wages: The Commission may supervise payment of the back wages and may bring suit for back pay and an equal amount as liquidated damages. The employee may sue for back pay and an additional sum, up to the amount of back pay, as liquidated damages, plus attorney's fees and court costs. The employee may not bring suit if he or she has been paid back wages in full under supervision of the Commission, or if the Commission has filed suit under the Act to collect the wages due the employee. The Commission may also obtain a court injunction to restrain any person from violating the law, including the unlawful withholding by an employer of proper compensation. A 2-year statute of limitations applies to the recovery of unpaid wages, except that an action on a cause of action arising out of a willful violation may be commenced within 3 years after the cause of action accrued.
( c ) Willful violations of the Act may be prosecuted criminally and the violator fined up to $10,000. A second conviction for such a violation may result in imprisonment.
( d ) Violation of any provision of the Act by any person, including any labor organization or agent thereof, is unlawful, as provided in section 15(a) of the FLSA. Accordingly, any labor organization, or agent thereof, who violates any provision of the Act is subject to injunction proceedings in accordance with the applicable provisions of section 17 of the FLSA. Any such labor organization, or agent thereof, who willfully violates the provisions of section 15 is liable to the penalties set forth in section 16(a) of the FLSA.
[46 FR 4888, Jan. 19, 1981. Redesignated at 51 FR 29819, Aug. 20, 1986]
§ 1912a.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) Section 7(a) of the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 establishes a National Advisory Committee on Occupational Safety and Health (hereinafter referred to as the Committee), to advise, consult with, and make recommendations to the Secretary of Labor and the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, on matters relating to the administration of the Act.
( b ) This part 1912a sets forth the procedures used by the Committee in fulfilling its responsibilities. They are intended to comply with the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), which obligates advisory committees used by federal agencies to adhere to certain basic methods of operation and administration.
----

Action brought on 12 May 2004 by the Italian Republic against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-211/04)

(2004/C 179/16)

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 12 May 2004 by the Italian Republic, represented by Ivo Maria Braguglia, acting as Agent, assisted by Maurizio Fiorelli, Avvocato dello Stato.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant claims that the regulation amending Regulation No 753/2002 is vitiated by reason of:

----

(1)OJ L 55 of 24.02.2004, p. 16.

(2)OJ L 118 of 04.05.2004, p. 1.

(3)OJ L 179 of 14.07.1999, p. 1.

----
#### § 18.1103 Title.

These rules may be known as the United States Department of Labor Rules of Evidence and cited as 29 CFR 18.__ (1989).
### Recent Similar Granted 333 Exemptions

 **Exemption No. 15151** Aerial photography and videography for crop surveying, inspections and other flight operations.  **Exemption No. 15140** DJI Inspire 1, Phantom 3  **Exemption No. 14901** Aerial surveying, imaging, and inspections  **Exemption No. 14301** Precision agriculture, aerial mapping and imaging, utility pipeline and powerline inspection.  **Exemption No. 13926** Aerial photography and videography for real estate , Blade Chroma
<PAGE>6
Exhibit 32 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Citizens First


Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004,

as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report") I, Mary D. Cohron, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company


By:  /s/Mary D. Cohron
        Mary D. Cohron
     Chief Executive Officer



Date:  August 13, 2004

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Citizens First

Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, as

filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report") I, Bill Wright, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company





By:  /s/ Bill D. Wright
         Bill D. Wright
     Chief Financial Officer


Date: August 13, 2004

                                                6
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25528]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10852]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Executive Committee of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory 
Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of the Executive Committee of the Federal Aviation 
Administration Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held May 10, 2000 at 11 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Ave., SW., Room 1014, Washington, DC. 
20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regina Jones, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, 
telephone (202) 267-9822; fax (202) 267-5075; e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#51033436383f307f1b3e3f3422113730307f363e27"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f7a592909e9996d9bd98999284b7919696d9909881">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. II), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the Executive Committee to be held on May 
10, 2000, at the Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence 
Ave., SW., Room 1014, Washington, DC 20590. The agenda will include:
    <bullet> Use of proxy votes
    <bullet> ARAC Chair and Vice Chair
    <bullet> New ARAC members
    Attendance is open to the interested public but will be limited to 
the space available. The public must make arrangements by May 3, to 
present oral statements at the meeting. The public may present written 
statements to the executive committee at any time by providing 25 
copies to the Executive Director, or by bringing the copies to the 
meeting.
    If you are in need of assistance or require a reasonable 
accommodation for this meeting, please contact the person listed under 
the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 21, 2000.
Anthony F. Fazo,
Executive Director, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 00-10852 Filed 4-27-00; 11:10 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Amendment to Employee Agreement








Exhibit 10.1
[FIRST/SECOND] AMENDMENT
TO THE 
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
APRIL 5, 2015


WHEREAS, TESCO CORPORATION, a corporation organized under the laws of the province of Alberta, Canada (the “Company”) and [NAME] (“Executive”) entered into the Employment Agreement effective on [EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT] (the “Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Agreement sets forth that Executive’s Base Annual Salary in effect at this time is [CURRENT BASE SALARY]; and
WHEREAS, Executive and the Company (the “Parties”) have now agreed that, as a result of certain changes in market conditions, effective April 5, 2015 Executive’s Base Annual Salary shall be [CURRENT BASE SALARY REDUCED BY 5%], reflecting a 5% reduction from Executive’s Base Annual Salary as set forth by the Agreement (the “Reduction”); and
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive agree that this Reduction is immaterial under Section 5(a) of the Agreement, and that this Reduction shall not constitute a Good Reason under the Agreement; 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, which the Parties acknowledge is good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree to the amendment of the Agreement as follows (this “Amendment”): 
The first sentence of Section 5(a) shall be replaced with the following:
“Executive shall receive a Base Annual Salary annually of [CURRENT BASE SALARY REDUCED BY 5%] payable in bi-weekly pay periods, subject to deduction of statutorily required amounts, including but not limited to, withholding for federal, state and local income taxes, and amounts payable by employees of Employer for employee benefits.” 
Executive, by executing this Amendment, agrees that the Reduction and amendment of Section 5(a) of the Agreement as provided in this Amendment are immaterial under Section 5(a) of the Agreement and shall not constitute Good Reason under the Agreement, and Executive waives any claims or rights he may have as a result of the Reduction and the amendment of Section 5(a); provided, however,  that Employee reserves the right to consider whether further diminution to the Base Annual Salary during the calendar year 2015 along with  this Reduction may constitute Good Reason under the Agreement without limiting the other requirements in the Agreement for Executive to terminate his employment for Good Reason, including the notice provisions in Section 6(e).











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment to the Agreement effective as of April 5, 2015.
                    


EXECUTIVE
                        
Signature:  ________________________
    


Date:  ____________________________




EMPLOYER:




Tesco Corporation






By:    ____________________________
        


Date:  ____________________________
§ 22.4 Investigation. ( a ) If an investigating official concludes that a subpoena pursuant to the authority conferred by 31 U.S.C. 3804(a) is warranted— ( 1 ) The subpoena so issued shall notify the person to whom it is addressed of the authority under which the subpoena is issued and shall identify the records or documents sought;
( 2 ) The investigating official may designate a person to act on his or her behalf to receive the documents sought; and
( 3 ) The person receiving such subpoena shall be required to tender to the investigating official or the person designated to receive the documents a certification that the documents sought have been produced, or that such documents are not available and the reasons therefor, or that such documents, suitably identified, have been withheld based upon the assertion of an identified privilege.
( b ) If the investigating official concludes that an action under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act may be warranted, the investigating official shall submit a report containing the findings and conclusions of such investigation to the reviewing official.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall preclude or limit an investigating official's discretion to refer allegations directly to the Department of Justice for suit under the False Claims Act or other civil relief, or to defer or postpone a report or referral to the reviewing official to avoid interference with a criminal investigation or prosecution.
( d ) Nothing in this section modifies any responsibility of an investigating official to report violations of criminal law to the Attorney General.