alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 18.63 Requests for admission. ( a ) *Scope and procedure* — ( 1 ) *Scope.* A party may serve on any other party a written request to admit, for purposes of the pending action only, the truth of any matters within the scope of § 18.51 relating to: ( i ) Facts, the application of law to fact, or opinions about either; and
( ii ) The genuineness of any described documents.
( 2 ) *Form; copy of a document.* Each matter must be separately stated. A request to admit the genuineness of a document must be accompanied by a copy of the document unless it is, or has been, otherwise furnished or made available for inspection and copying.
( 3 ) *Time to respond; effect of not responding.* A matter is admitted unless, within 30 days after being served, the party to whom the request is directed serves on the requesting party a written answer or objection addressed to the matter and signed by the party or its attorney. A shorter or longer time for responding may be stipulated to under § 18.54 or be ordered by the judge.
( 4 ) *Answer.* If a matter is not admitted, the answer must specifically deny it or state in detail why the answering party cannot truthfully admit or deny it. A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the matter; and when good faith requires that a party qualify an answer or deny only a part of a matter, the answer must specify the part admitted and qualify or deny the rest. The answering party may assert lack of knowledge or information as a reason for failing to admit or deny only if the party states that it has made reasonable inquiry and that the information it knows or can readily obtain is insufficient to enable it to admit or deny.
( 5 ) *Objections.* The grounds for objecting to a request must be stated. A party must not object solely on the ground that the request presents a genuine issue for hearing.
( 6 ) *Motion regarding the sufficiency of an answer or objection.* The requesting party may move to determine the sufficiency of an answer or objection. Unless the judge finds an objection justified, the judge must order that an answer be served. On finding that an answer does not comply with this section, the judge may order either that the matter is admitted or that an amended answer be served. The judge may defer final decision until a prehearing conference or a specified time before the hearing.
( b ) *Effect of an admission; withdrawing or amending it.* A matter admitted under this section is conclusively established unless the judge, on motion, permits the admission to be withdrawn or amended. The judge may permit withdrawal or amendment if it would promote the presentation of the merits of the action and if the judge is not persuaded that it would prejudice the requesting party in maintaining or defending the action on the merits. An admission under this section is not an admission for any other purpose and cannot be used against the party in any other proceeding.
§ 22.35 The record. ( a ) The hearing will be recorded and transcribed. Transcripts may be obtained following the hearing from the ALJ at a cost not to exceed the actual cost of duplication.
( b ) The transcript of testimony, exhibits, and other evidence admitted at the hearing, and all papers and requests filed in the proceeding constitute the record for the decision by the ALJ, the ARB, and the authority head.
( c ) The record may be inspected and copied (upon payment of a reasonable fee) by anyone, unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ pursuant to § 22.24.
[52 FR 48492, Dec. 22, 1987, as amended at 86 FR 1781, Jan. 11, 2021]
# **Exhibit 31.1**

# ** **

# **CERTIFICATIONS**

 

## Louisville Gas andElectric Company

 

I,Victor A. Staffieri, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Louisville Gas andElectric Company;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

# ** **

Date:  March 29, 2006

 
| /s/ Victor A. Staffieri |   |
|-------------------------|--------|

VictorA. Staffieri

Chairmanof the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

154

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Silver Butte quadrangle, Oregon: 7.5-minute series (topographic)**
 
2012 | 2014 | 2015 | 2017
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28/6:44118-H 5/
Item Number:0080-G-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000932003
 
January 24, 2018
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 814 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the deduction of 

attorney-advanced expenses and court costs in contingency fee cases. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 8, 2007 

Mr. SPECTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

deduction of attorney-advanced expenses and court costs 

in contingency fee cases. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEDUCTION OF ATTORNEY-ADVANCED EX4 PENSES AND COURT COSTS IN CONTINGENCY 

5 FEE CASES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 162 of the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 (relating to trade or business expenses) 

8 is amended by redesignating subsection (q) as subsection 

9 (r) and by inserting after subsection (p) the following new 

10 subsection: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 814 IS

1 ‘‘(q) ATTORNEY-ADVANCED EXPENSES AND COURT

2 COSTS IN CONTINGENCY FEE CASES.—There shall be al3 lowed as a deduction under this section any expenses and 

4 court costs paid or incurred by an attorney the repayment 

5 of which is contingent on a recovery by judgment or settle6 ment in the action to which such expenses and costs relate. 

7 Such deduction shall be allowed in the taxable year in 

8 which such expenses and costs are paid or incurred by the 

9 taxpayer.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to expenses and costs paid or in12 curred after the date of the enactment of this Act, in tax13 able years beginning after such date. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### § 1691.11 EEOC negotiated settlements and conciliation agreements.

If the parties enter into a negotiated settlement (as described in 29 CFR 1601.20) prior to a determination or a conciliation agreement (as described in 29 CFR 1601.24) after a determination, EEOC shall notify the referring agency that the complaint has been settled. The agency shall take no further action on the complaint of employment discrimination thereafter except that the agency may take the existence of the complaint into account in scheduling the recipient for a review under the agency's regulations.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 97 (Thursday, May 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12446]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Research, Evaluation and Communication; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Research, Evaluation and Communication (1210).
    Date/Time: June 26, 2000--Rooms 380 & 390 (8am-6pm)
    June 27, 2000--Rooms 380 & 390 (8am-6pm)
    July 13, 2000--Rooms 380 & 390 (8am-6pm)
    July 14, 2000--Rooms 380 & 390 (8am-6pm)
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Elizabeth VanderPutten, Program Director, 
Research Evaluation and Communications Division National Science 
Foundation, Room 855, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. 
(703) 306-1650.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate ROLE Proposals as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) 
and(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 12, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-12446 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 93 (Friday, May 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30579-30580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11925]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. Nos. ER00-1782-000 and ER00-1782-001]


Duke Energy Trenton, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 8, 2000.
    Duke Energy Trenton, LLC (Duke Trenton) submitted for filing a rate

[[Page 30580]]

schedule under which Duke Trenton will engage in wholesale electric 
power and energy transactions as a marketer. Duke Trenton also 
requested waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular Duke 
Trenton requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 
CFR part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability by Duke Trenton.
    On May 5, 2000, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division Of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of order, any person desiring to be 
heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability by Duke Trenton should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Duke Trenton is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Duke Trenton's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby give that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests as set forth above, is June 5, 2000.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11925 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[No. 28780-3-II.

Division Two.

January 3, 2003.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jesse A. Frost, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Mason County, No. 01-8-00290-8, Toni A. Sheldon, J., entered May 7, 2002. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, C.J., concurred in by Morgan and Armstrong, JJ.
#### § 1960.54 Training of top management officials.

Each agency shall provide top management officials with orientation and other learning experiences which will enable them to manage the occupational safety and health programs of their agencies. Such orientation should include coverage of section 19 of the Act, Executive Order 12196, the requirements of this part, and the agency safety and health program.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 99 (Monday, May 22, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 32040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12417]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Part 235

[DFARS Case 200-D401]


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Research, 
Development, Test, and Evaluation Budget Category Definitions

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Acting Director of Defense Procurement has issued a final 
rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement 
(DFARS) to remove obsolete definitions pertaining to research and 
development efforts. The rule replaces the obsolete definitions with a 
reference to the current definitions pertaining to research and 
development found in the DoD Financial Management Regulation.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 22, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Susan Schneider, Defense 
Acquisition Regulations Council, PDUSD(AT&L)DP(DAR), IMD 3D139, 3062 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062. Telephone (703) 602-0326; 
telefax (703) 602-0350. Please cite DFARS Case 2000-D401.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  

A. Background

    This final rule revises DFARS 235.001 to remove obsolete 
definitions pertaining to research and development and to replace the 
definitions with a reference to those in the DoD Financial Management 
Regulation (DoD 7000.14-R).
    This rule was not subject to Office of Management and Budget review 
under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    This final rule does not constitute a significant revision within 
the meaning of FAR 1.501 and Public Law 98-577 and publication for 
public comment is not required. However, DoD will consider comments 
from small entities concerning the affected DFARS subpart in accordance 
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Such comments should cite DFARS Case 2000-D401.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the rule does 
not impose any information collection requirements that require the 
approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, 
et seq.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 235

    Government procurement.

Michele P. Peterson,
Executive Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council.


    Therefore, 48 CFR Part 235 is amended as follows:
    1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Part 235 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Chapter 1.

PART 235--RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING

    2. Section 235.001 is revised to read as follows:


235.001  Definitions.

    ``Research and development'' means those efforts described by the 
Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E) budget activity 
definitions found in the DoD Financial Management Regulation (DoD 
7000.14-R), Volume 2B, Chapter 5.

[FR Doc. 00-12417 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
§ 2205.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the individual with a disability.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, TDD's or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with this section would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the Chairman or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity, and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
§ 1982.114 District court jurisdiction of retaliation complaints. ( a ) If there is no final order of the Secretary, 210 days have passed since the filing of the complaint, and there is no showing that there has been delay due to the bad faith of the complainant, the complainant may bring an action at law or equity for de novo review in the appropriate district court of the United States, which will have jurisdiction over such an action without regard to the amount in controversy. At the request of either party, the action shall be tried by the court with a jury.
( b ) A proceeding under paragraph (a) of this section shall be governed by the same legal burdens of proof specified in § 1982.109. An employee prevailing in a proceeding under paragraph (a) shall be entitled to all relief necessary to make the employee whole, including, where appropriate: Reinstatement with the same seniority status that the employee would have had, but for the retaliation; any back pay with interest; and payment of compensatory damages, including compensation for any special damages sustained as a result of the retaliation, including litigation costs, expert witness fees, and reasonable attorney fees. The court may also order punitive damages in an amount not to exceed $250,000.
( c ) Within 7 days after filing a complaint in federal court, a complainant must file with the Assistant Secretary, the ALJ, or the ARB, depending upon where the proceeding is pending, a copy of the file-stamped complaint. In all cases, a copy of the complaint must also be served on the OSHA official who issued the findings and/or preliminary order, the Assistant Secretary, and the Associate Solicitor, Division of Fair Labor Standards, U.S. Department of Labor.