alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       195,009,506
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   2,363,864
<MORTGAGE>                                  17,795,599
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  419,820
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             224,114,249
<CASH>                                       2,428,652
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             324,552
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      23,341,062
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             291,215,210
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            226,449,401
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         24,163,694
<POLICY-OTHER>                               2,012,392
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,830,608
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 70,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,154,880
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,873,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               291,215,210
<PREMIUMS>                                  46,907,642
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         15,211,964
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           (307,275)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 959,332
<BENEFITS>                                  22,845,282
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                (2,072,120)
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        37,146,745
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,851,756
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,631,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,220,756
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (841,500)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,379,256
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 18, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00652

- CV

John HARWOOD

, Ap pellant

v.

Brian GILROY

, Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CI11327

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Th is court issued its opinion on June 28, 2017, and any motion for rehearing was due on July 13, 2017. On July 13, 2017, appellee filed a motion requesting an extension of time until September 1, 2017 in which to file a motion for rehearing.

We grant the motion in part and deny in part. If appellee wishes to file a motion for rehearing and/ or a motion for en banc reconsideration, appellee must file the motion (s) no later than August 14, 2017

. Further requests for extensions of time are disfavored.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of July, 2017

.

___________________________________ Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk
§ 1625.30 Administrative exemptions; procedures. ( a ) Section 9 of the Act provides that, In accordance with the provisions of subchapter II of chapter 5, of title 5, United States Code, the Secretary of Labor * * * may establish such reasonable exemptions to and from any or all provisions of this Act as he may find necessary and proper in the public interest.
( b ) The authority conferred on the Commission by section 9 of the Act to establish reasonable exemptions will be exercised with caution and due regard for the remedial purpose of the statute to promote employment of older persons based on their ability rather than age and to prohibit arbitrary age discrimination in employment. Administrative action consistent with this statutory purpose may be taken under this section, with or without a request therefor, when found necessary and proper in the public interest in accordance with the statutory standards. No formal procedures have been prescribed for requesting such action. However, a reasonable exemption from the Act's provisions will be granted only if it is decided, after notice published in the Federal Register giving all interested persons an opportunity to present data, views, or arguments, that a strong and affirmative showing has been made that such exemption is in fact necessary and proper in the public interest. Request for such exemption shall be submitted in writing to the Commission.
#### BABBITT v SAY Admr

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21426.

Decided Mar 13, 1929

Syllabus by

DAY, J.

NEGLIGENCE-Trial (590 V2c)

(370 C2) In the trial of an action- for damages for death by wrongful act, upon a motion being made by defendant for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s case, upon the ground of the contributory negligence of the decedent, the evidence should be given the most favorable interpretation in behalf of plaintiff, and, if a reasonable inference may be- drawn from such evidence that the decedent was exercising due care, such motion should be overruled and the question of contributory negligence submitted to the jury, under proper instructions.

TRIAL

(590 W3g) A witness may be cross-examined with reference to a written statement previously made and signed by him, concerning the facts under investigation; and where the record discloses the contents of such paper is incorporated piecemeal in questions propounded to the-witness in the presence of the jury, together with his answers thereto, the witness admitting making every statement contained in such writing, it is not prejudicial error to refuse admission of such written^ statement in connection with the cross-examination of such witness, there being no denials that would show contradiction and thus lessen the credit of the witness.

NEGLIGENCE

(370 R2) The rule of respondeat superior rests on the power which the superior has a right to exercise and which, for the protection of third persons, he is bound to exercise over the acts of his subordinates^ It does not apply where the power of control does not' exist and, in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, the power does not ordinarily exist where there is no right of selection or discharge of such subordinate.

AUTOMOBILES

. (50 Na2) Where an owner of an automobile truck hires it out, together with the driver as a unit, at a stipulated price per hour, furnishes gasoline, oil and service to keep such truck in proper mechanical condition, selects and pays the driver and is the only one who can discharge such driver, and while the hirer -may dispense with the services of such truck .and driver as a unit, he has no such exclusive control over the driver that permits him to do more than to designate what work is to be done, under such circumstances the owner is liable in damages to a third person for injuries proximately caused by the driver’s negligent operation of the truck, within the scope of such employment.

Marshall, CJ, Robinson, Jones, Matthias and Allen, JJ, concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           65054
<DEPRECIATION>                                     187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   64867
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            27603
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          9058
<OTHER-SE>                                       28206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     64867
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 18526
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (115)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (18641)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (18641)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (18641)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

###### [Investigations Nos. 731-TA-406 & 408 (Review)] 

## Determinations 

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on electrolytic manganese dioxide from Greece and Japan would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. [2] 

## Background 

                    The Commission instituted these reviews on May 3, 1999 (64 FR 23675) and determined on August 25, 1999 that it would conduct full reviews (64 FR 46407, August 25, 1999). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 6, 1999 (64 FR 54353). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on March 2, 2000, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel.                 

The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to the Secretary of Commerce on May 9, 2000. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3296 (May 2000), entitled Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide from Greece and Japan: Investigations Nos. 731-TA 406 and 408 (Review). 

Issued: May 12, 2000. 

By order of the Commission. 

Donna R. Koehnke, 

Secretary. 

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR § 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             Chairman Lynn M. Bragg dissenting.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-12421 Filed 5-16-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Illinois�s forest resources in...**
 
2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009
2010 | 2011 | 2012
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.163/13:
Item Number:0084-N-13 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000561750
 
March 28, 2018
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 19-12135

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:18-cr-20919-JEM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAMION HAWTHORNE,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(March 13, 2020)

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, GRANT, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 19-12135 Date Filed: 03/13/2020 Page: 1 of 2
2

Bonnie Phillips-Williams, appointed counsel for Damion Hawthorne in this 

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of 

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Hawthorne’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 19-12135 Date Filed: 03/13/2020 Page: 2 of 2
128 STAT. 1838 PUBLIC LAW 113–158—AUG. 8, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4838: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

July 28, considered and passed House. 

July 31, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–158 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To redesignate the railroad station located at 2955 Market Street in Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania, commonly known as ‘‘30th Street Station’’, as the ‘‘William H. 

Gray III 30th Street Station’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

The railroad station located at 2955 Market Street in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, commonly known as ‘‘30th Street Station’’, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘William H. Gray III 30th Street 

Station’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the railroad station referred 

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘William 

H. Gray III 30th Street Station’’. 

Approved August 8, 2014. 

49 USC 24909. 

49 USC 24909 

note. 

Aug. 8, 2014 

[H.R. 4838] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
R18-2-215. Ambient air quality monitoring methods and procedures

A. Only those methods which have been either designated by the Administrator as reference or 

equivalent methods or approved by the Director shall be used to monitor ambient air.

B. Quality assurance, monitor siting, and sample probe installation procedures shall be in 

accordance with procedures described in the Appendices to 40 CFR 58. 

C. The Director may approve other procedures upon a finding that the proposed procedures are 

substantially equivalent or superior to procedures in the Appendices to 40 CFR 58. 

Historical Note

Adopted effective September 22, 1983 (Supp. 83-5). Former Section R9-3-215 renumbered 

without change as Section R18-2-215 (Supp. 87-3). Amended effective September 26, 

1990 (Supp. 90-3).
# EUR-Lex - 32000D0076 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000D0076

**2000/76/EC: Commission Decision of 17 December 1999 amending Decision 97/468/EC on drawing up provisional lists of third country establishments from which the Member States authorise imports of wild game meat (notified under document number C(1999) 4675) (Text with EEA relevance.) **

*
Official Journal L 030 , 04/02/2000 P. 0033 - 0034 *

COMMISSION DECISION

of 17 December 1999

amending Decision 97/468/EC on drawing up provisional lists of third country establishments from which the Member States authorise imports of wild game meat

(notified under document number C(1999) 4675)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2000/76/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 95/408/EC of 22 June 1995 on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States are authorised to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs(1), as last amended by Decision 98/603/EC(2), and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) provisional lists of establishments producing wild game meat have been drawn up by Commission Decision 97/468/EC(3);

(2) Latvia has sent a list of establishments producing wild game meat and for which the responsible authorities certify that the establishment is in accordance with the Community rules;

(3) a provisional list of establishments producing wild game meat can thus be drawn up for Latvia;

(4) the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The text of the Annex to this Decision is added to the Annex to Decision 97/468/EC.

Article 2

This decision shall apply from 15 December 1999.

Article 3

This decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 December 1999.

For the Commission

David BYRNE

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 243, 11.10.1995, p. 17.

(2) OJ L 289, 28.10.1998, p. 36.

(3) OJ L 199, 26.7.1997, p. 62.

ANEXO/BILAG/ANHANG/ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ/ANNEX/ANNEXE/ALLEGATO/BIJLAGE/ANEXO/LIITE/BILAGA

"País: LETONIA/Land: LETLAND/Land: LETTLAND/Χώρα: ΛΕΤΟΝΙΑ/Country: LATVIA/Pays: LETTONIE/Paese: LETTONIA/Land: LETLAND/País: LETÓNIA/Maa: LATVIA/Land: LETTLAND

>TABLE>"
#### Samuel Boyden Junior *versus*Simeon Hastings.

In an action of debt brought by S. B.yumor, on a judgment, the declaration set foitii the record of a judgment in favor of S. B., but the record produced set forth a judgment recovered by S. B. *junio*.*Held, that this was a variance.

Action of debt on a judgment. The declaration set forth the record of a judgment against the defendant in favor of Samuel Boyden. The defendant pleaded *nul tiel record.*And upon oyer, the record produced set forth a judgment recovered by Samuel Boyden junior.

Burnside, for the plaintiff,

cited *Kincaid*v. *Howe,*10 Mass. R. 203 ; *Commonwealth*v. *Perkins,*1 Pick. 388 ; *Amey*v. *Long,*1 Campb. 15.

*Bigelow,*for the defendant,

cited 2 Esp. Dig. 744 ; 5 Dane’s Abr. 438 ; *Wilson*v. *Gilbert,*2 Bos. & Pul. 281.

Putnam J.

afterward drew up the opinion of the Court. It seems to us to be very clear, that there is no such record as the plaintiff hath set forth in his declaration. If we were to say otherwise, it would be determining that Samuel Boyden junior was Samuel Boyden, without any averment of the fact. Thus in 2 Esp. Dig. 744, if a man pleads outlawry of the plaintiff by the name of J. S. *knight,*and the record brought in, be of J. S. *gent.,*this is a failure of record. There is a quaere, in Bro. Abr. *tit. Failer of Record, pl.*11, from which the case is taken, whether it should not have been averred, that he was made knight afterwards. And, no doubt, where the person who sues is the same, he may aver the fact in his declaration. Thus, if the fact would support him, the plaintiff might have alleged that he, by the name of Samuel Boy-den, recovered the judgment, &c. 5 Dane’s Abr. 438. As the pleadings now stand, we cannot presume that Samuel Boy-den junior and Samuel Boyden, are the same person. It is true that *junior*is no part of the name. *Kincaid*v. *Howe,*10 Mass. R. 205. But it is used to distinguish the person ; and it is used where the father and son are of the same name ; and when it is so used, the Court is bound to presume that such is the truth of the case.

Judgment will be entered for the defendant, unless the *201plaintiff shall move to amend. The plaintiff may have leave to amend upon payment of costs from the time of joining the issue to the present time.
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intelligent Living Corp. (formerly Elgrande.com, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael F. Holloran, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



DATED:    April 14, 2009

/s/ Michael F. Holloran

-----------------------------

Michael F. Holloran;

Chief Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer