alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Crdentia Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), I, James J. TerBeest, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18,Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to my knowledge:

1.                 theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                 theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the datesand for the periods indicated.

This Certificationhas not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.
| Date: August 14, 2006 | By:    | /s/ James J. TerBeest   |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                  |   | James J. TerBeest       |
|                  |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted), I, Dianne Hatton-Ward, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
that, to the best of his or her knowledge:




1.
The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009,
and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "PERIODIC
REPORT") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company
for the period covered by the Periodic Report.




Dated:
May 7, 2009




S/
Dianne Hatton-Ward


Dianne
Hatton-Ward


CEO &
CFO




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Yummies, Inc. and will be retained by Yummies, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request




THIS
CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SS. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED "FILED" BY THE COMPANY FOR PURPOSES OF
SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.
June 25, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EX PARTE SALVADOR A RAMOS

NO. 14-12-00739-CR 

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
§ 1915.181 Electrical circuits and distribution boards. ( a ) The provisions of this section shall apply to ship repairing and shipbuilding and shall not apply to shipbreaking.
( b ) Before an employee is permitted to work on an electrical circuit, except when the circuit must remain energized for testing and adjusting, the circuit shall be deenergized and checked at the point at which the work is to be done to insure that it is actually deenergized. When testing or adjusting an energized circuit a rubber mat, duck board, or other suitable insulation shall be used underfoot where an insulated deck does not exist.
( c ) De-energizing the circuit shall be accomplished by opening the circuit breaker, opening the switch, or removing the fuse, whichever method is appropriate. The circuit breaker, switch, or fuse location shall then be locked out or tagged in accordance with § 1915.89.
( d ) When work is performed immediately adjacent to an open-front energized board or in back of an energized board, the board shall be covered or some other equally safe means shall be used to prevent contact with any of the energized parts.
[47 FR 16986, Apr. 20, 1982, as amended at 67 FR 44545, July 3, 2002; 76 FR 24711, May 2, 2011]
§ 15.202 How is a claim filed under the MPCECA? ( a ) A claim under this subpart must be presented in writing. A sample claim, located on the Department's Office of the Solicitor, Federal Employees' and Energy Workers' Compensation Division Web site at *www.dol.gov ,* is provided as an example for convenience of filing. The SF-95 for FTCA claims is not an appropriate form for a MPCECA claim.
( b ) The claimant is responsible for substantiating ownership or possession, the facts surrounding the loss or damage, and the value of the property. Any claim filed must be accompanied by the following: ( 1 ) A written statement, signed by the claimant or his or her authorized agent, setting forth the circumstances under which the damage or loss occurred. This statement may also include: ( i ) A description of the type, design, model number or other identification of the property.
( ii ) The date of purchase or acquisition and the original cost of the property.
( iii ) The location of the property when the loss or damage occurred.
( iv ) The value of the property when lost or damaged.
( v ) The actual or estimated cost of the repair of any damaged item.
( vi ) The purpose of and authority for travel, if the loss or damage occurred incident to transportation or to the use of a motor vehicle.
( vii ) Any and all available information as to the party responsible for the loss or damage, if such party is someone other than the claimant, and all information as to insurance contracts, whether held by the claimant or by the party responsible.
( 2 ) Copies of all available and appropriate documents such as bills of sale, estimates of repairs, or travel orders. In the case of an automobile, the claimant must file two estimates of repair or a certified paid bill showing the damage incurred and the cost of all parts, labor and other items necessary to the repair of the vehicle or a statement from an authorized dealer or repair garage showing that the cost of such repairs exceeds the value of the vehicle. The Office of the Solicitor may waive the requirement of two estimates of repair.
( 3 ) A copy of the power of attorney or other authorization if someone other than the employee files the claim.
( 4 ) A statement from the employee's immediate supervisor confirming that possession of the property was reasonable, useful or proper under the circumstances and that the damage or loss was incident to service.
# EUR-Lex - 32000R2881 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R2881

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2881/2000 of 27 December 2000 derogating from Regulation (EEC) No 1859/93 on the application of the system of import licences for garlic imported from third countries **

*
Official Journal L 333 , 29/12/2000 P. 0071 - 0071 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 2881/2000

of 27 December 2000

derogating from Regulation (EEC) No 1859/93 on the application of the system of import licences for garlic imported from third countries

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2699/2000(2), and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) The Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1104/2000(3) lays down periods for the submission of applications for import licences for garlic originating in China.

(2) Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1859/93(4), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1662/94(5), stipulates that import licences are to be valid for 40 days from their date of issue as defined in Article 3(2) of that Regulation. Since the period for submitting import licence applications for garlic originating in China for December 2000 and January 2001 is longer, the term of validity of licences issued for that period should be extended where the applicants so request.

(3) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Fresh Fruit and Vegetables,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Notwithstanding Article 2(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1859/93, the competent national authorities may extend the term of validity of import licences for garlic originating in China issued for the period December 2000 to January 2001 as referred to in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1104/2000 to 80 days from their date of issue where the holder of the licence concerned so requests.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 December 2000.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 311, 12.12.2000, p. 9.

(3) OJ L 125, 26.5.2000, p. 21.

(4) OJ L 170, 13.7.1993, p. 10.

(5) OJ L 176, 9.7.1994, p. 1.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7278

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BRYANT KELLY PRIDE, a/k/a Bryan Kelly Pride,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District 

Judge. (1:07-cr-00020-jpj-mfu-1)

Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 20, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bryant Kelly Pride, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, 

Zachary T. Lee, Assistant United States Attorneys, Abingdon, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bryant Kelly Pride appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his motion for return of property. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Pride, No. 1:07-cr-0020-jpj-mfu-1 (W.D. Va. Aug. 30, 

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
§ 1471.905 Affiliate. Persons are *affiliates* of each other if, directly or indirectly, either one controls or has the power to control the other or a third person controls or has the power to control both. The ways we use to determine control include, but are not limited to— ( a ) Interlocking management or ownership;
( b ) Identity of interests among family members;
( c ) Shared facilities and equipment;
( d ) Common use of employees; or
( e ) A business entity which has been organized following the exclusion of a person which has the same or similar management, ownership, or principal employees as the excluded person.
# EUR-Lex - 32000R1575 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R1575

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1575/2000 of 19 July 2000 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 577/98 on the organisation of a labour force sample survey in the Community concerning the codification to be used for data transmission from 2001 onwards **

*
Official Journal L 181 , 20/07/2000 P. 0016 - 0034 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1575/2000

of 19 July 2000

implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 577/98 on the organisation of a labour force sample survey in the Community concerning the codification to be used for data transmission from 2001 onwards

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 577/98 of 9 March 1998 on the organisation of a labour force sample survey in the Community(1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1571/98(2), and in particular Article 4(3) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) In accordance with Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 577/98 implementing measures are necessary for defining the codification of the variables to be used for the data transmission.

(2) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Statistical Programme Committee established by Council Decision 89/382/EEC, Euratom(3),

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The codification of the variables to be used for the data transmission for the years 2001 and onwards is laid down in the Annex to the present Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 July 2000.

For the Commission

Pedro Solbes Mira

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 77, 14.3.1998, p. 3.

(2) OJ L 205, 22.7.1998, p. 40.

(3) OJ L 181, 28.6.1989, p. 47.

ANNEX

>TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 32000D0481 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000D0481

**2000/481/EC: Commission Decision of 14 July 2000 on the recognition of 'RINAVE - Registro Internacional Naval, SA' in accordance with Council Directive 94/57/EC (notified under document number C(2000) 1876) (Text with EEA relevance) (Only the Portuguese text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 193 , 29/07/2000 P. 0091 - 0091 *

Commission Decision

of 14 July 2000

on the recognition of "RINAVE - Registro Internacional Naval, SA" in accordance with Council Directive 94/57/EC

(notified under document number C(2000) 1876)

(Only the Portuguese text is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2000/481/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 94/57/EC of 22 November 1994 on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administration(1), and in particular Article 4(3) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 4(3) of Council Directive 94/57/EC states that Member States may submit to the Commission a request for a recognition of three years for organisations which meet all the criteria of the Annex other than those set out under paragraph 2 and 3 of the section "General" of the Annex,

(2) Portugal has submitted a request for a recognition of three years for "RINAVE - Registro Internacional Naval, SA" as per Article 4(3) of the abovementioned Directive.

(3) The Commission has verified that "RINAVE - Registro Internacional Naval, SA" meets all the criteria of the Annex to the abovementioned Directive other than those set out under paragraph 2 and 3 of section "General" of the Annex.

(4) The provisions of this Decision are in line with the opinion of the Committee set out in Article 7 of Directive 94/57/EC,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

"RINAVE - Registro Internacional Naval, SA" is recognised pursuant to Article 4(3) of Council Directive 94/57/EC for a period of three years as from the date of adoption of this Decision.

Article 2

The effects of this recognition are limited to Portugal.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Portuguese Republic.

Done at Brussels, 14 July 2000.

For the Commission

Loyola De Palacio

Vice-President

(1) OJ L 319, 12.12.1994, p. 20.
# L_2011283DE.01004601.xml

| 29.10.2011 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 283/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 283/46

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 1999/94/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 13. Dezember 1999 über die Bereitstellung von Verbraucherinformationen über den Kraftstoffverbrauch und CO2-Emissionen beim Marketing für neue Personenkraftwagen

2

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 12 vom 18. Januar 2000
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 12 vom 18. Januar 2000

Seite 21, Anhang II, Einleitungssatz:

anstatt:

„Die Mitgliedstaaten stellen sicher, dass der Leitfaden über den Kraftstoffverbrauch durch die CO2-Emissionen zumindest folgende Angaben enthält:“

muss es heißen:

„Die Mitgliedstaaten stellen sicher, dass der Leitfaden über den Kraftstoffverbrauch und die CO2-Emissionen zumindest folgende Angaben enthält:“.

---
```

[113th Congress Public Law 158]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 1838]]

Public Law 113-158
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To redesignate the railroad station located at 2955 Market Street in 
 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, commonly known as ``30th Street Station'', 
  as the ``William H. Gray III 30th Street Station''. <<NOTE: Aug. 8, 
                         2014 -  [H.R. 4838]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: 49 USC 24909 
note.>> 
SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The railroad station located at 2955 Market Street in Philadelphia, 
Pennsylvania, commonly known as ``30th Street Station'', shall be known 
and designated as the ``William H. Gray III 30th Street Station''.
SEC. 2. <<NOTE: 49 USC 24909.>>  REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the railroad station referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William H. Gray III 
30th Street Station''.

    Approved August 8, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4838:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            July 28, considered and passed House.
            July 31, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 98 (Friday, May 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12595]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the Naval Research Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Naval Research Advisory Committee (NRAC) Panel on Quality 
of Life will meet to examine Quality of Life issues for Sailors and 
Marines in an effort to anticipate what they will be for the new Navy 
of the 21st century and what the Navy's responses to the new challenges 
will have to look like. All sessions of the meeting will be open to the 
public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 31, 2000, 8:30 a.m. 
to 5 p.m.; on Thursday, June 1, 2000, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; and on 
Friday, June 2, 2000, from 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Office of Naval Research, 
800 North Quincy Street, Arlington, Virginia.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Mason-Muir, Program Director, 
Naval Research Advisory Committee, 800 North Quincy Street, Arlington, 
VA 22217-5660, telephone (703) 696-6769.

    Dated: May 11, 2000.
J.L. Roth,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-12595 Filed 5-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6067

WILLIE LEE GARY, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KATE CLIFTON; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CA-95-1017-5-BO)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 3, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Lee Gary, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Gary v. Clifton, No. CA-95-1017-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 5,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# EUR-Lex - 31999R0583 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999R0583

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 583/1999 of 17 March 1999 on the maximum amount of the Community's financial contribution to be paid to the Member States concerned in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 723/97 **

*
Official Journal L 072 , 18/03/1999 P. 0028 - 0029 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 583/1999 of 17 March 1999 on the maximum amount of the Community's financial contribution to be paid to the Member States concerned in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 723/97

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 723/97 of 22 April 1997 on the implementation of Member States' action programmes on control of EAGGF Guarantee Section expenditure (1), and in particular Article 4(2) thereof,

Whereas the Fund Committee has been consulted;

Whereas Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 723/97 provides that the Community shall contribute towards the costs incurred by Member States in implementing new action programmes, arising out of new Community obligations; whereas Article 4(2) of the same Regulation provides that the Commission shall, after consulting the Fund Committee, set the maximum annual amount of the Community's financial contribution having regard to the appropriations and on the basis of the information supplied by the Member States concerned; whereas the amount in question shall be granted in accordance with Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1780/97 (2), laying down the rules of application of Regulation (EC) No 723/97, as last amended by the Regulation (EC) No 1890/98 (3); that the Member States concerned have supplied the relevant information to the Commission for the year 1999,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The maximum amount of the Community's financial contribution towards the costs incurred by the Member States concerned in implementing action programmes on control of EAGGF Guarantee Section expenditure for 1999, provided for by Council Regulation (EC) No 723/97 is set out in the Annex of this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 March 1999.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 108, 25. 4. 1997, p. 6.

(2) OJ L 252, 16. 9. 1997, p. 20.

(3) OJ L 245, 4. 9. 1998, p. 28.

ANNEX

>TABLE>