alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 954 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a technical 

correction to the amendments made by section 422 of the Medicare 

Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2007 

Mr. KOHL (for himself and Mr. FEINGOLD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for a technical correction to the amendments made by 

section 422 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Residency 

5 Program Technical Correction Act of 2007’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 954 IS

1 SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT RESI2 DENT SLOTS THAT WERE ERRONEOUSLY 

3 ELIMINATED. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1886(h)(7) of the Social 

5 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(h)(7)) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as sub7 paragraph (E); and 

8 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the fol9 lowing new subparagraph: 

10 ‘‘(D) ADJUSTMENT BASED ON SETTLED

11 COST REPORT.—In the case of a hospital for 

12 which— 

13 ‘‘(i) the otherwise applicable resident 

14 limit was reduced under subparagraph 

15 (A)(i)(I); and 

16 ‘‘(ii) such reduction was based on a 

17 reference resident level that was deter18 mined using a cost report that was subse19 quently settled, whether as a result of an 

20 appeal or otherwise, and the reference resi21 dent level under such settled cost report is 

22 higher than the level used for the reduction 

23 under subparagraph (A)(i)(I), 

24 the Secretary shall apply subparagraph 

25 (A)(i)(I) using the higher resident reference 

26 level and make any necessary adjustments to 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•S 954 IS

1 such reduction. Any such necessary adjustments 

2 shall be effective for portions of cost reporting 

3 periods occurring on or after July 1, 2005.’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall take effect as if included in the enact6 ment of section 422 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, 

7 Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 

8 108–173). 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
§ 22.18 Authority of the ALJ. ( a ) The ALJ shall conduct a fair and impartial hearing, avoid delay, maintain order, and assure that a record of the proceeding is made.
( b ) The ALJ has the authority to— ( 1 ) Set and change the date, time, and place of the hearing upon reasonable notice to the parties;
( 2 ) Continue or recess the hearing in whole or in part for a reasonable period of time;
( 3 ) Hold conferences to identify or simplify the issues, or to consider other matters that may aid in the expeditious disposition of the proceeding;
( 4 ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( 5 ) Issue subpoenas requiring the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents at depositions or at hearings;
( 6 ) Rule on motions and other procedural matters;
( 7 ) Regulate the scope and timing of discovery;
( 8 ) Regulate the course of the hearing and the conduct of representatives and parties;
( 9 ) Examine witnesses;
( 10 ) Receive, rule on, exclude, or limit evidence;
( 11 ) Upon motion of a party, take official notice of facts;
( 12 ) Upon motion of a party, decide cases, in whole or in part, by summary judgment where there is no disputed issue of material fact;
( 13 ) Conduct any conference, argument, or hearing on motions in person or by telephone; and
( 14 ) Exercise such other authority as is necessary to carry out the responsibilities of the ALJ under this part.
( c ) The ALJ does not have the authority to find Federal statutes or regulations invalid.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of The Enstar Group, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,
certifies that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

                  /s/ Nimrod T. Frazer
--------------------------------------------------------
Nimrod T. Frazer
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
September 19, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Enstar Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Enstar Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# Az Európai Unió C 171/2004

| | ISSN 1725-518X |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 171 |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 47. évfolyam2004. július 1. |

ISSN 1725-518X

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 171

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

47. évfolyam2004. július 1.

---

| Közleményszám | Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Információ |
| | Bizottság |
| 2004/C 171/1 | Euro átváltási árfolyamok | 1 |

Közleményszám

Tartalom

Oldal

I   Információ

Bizottság

2004/C 171/1

Euro átváltási árfolyamok

1

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

I Információ

Bizottság

| 1.7.2004 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | C 171/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2004

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

C 171/1

---

Euro átváltási árfolyamok (1)

2004. június 30.

(2004/C 171/01)

1 euro=

| | Pénznem | Átváltási árfolyam |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | USA dollár | 1,2155 |
| JPY | Japán yen | 132,40 |
| DKK | Dán korona | 7,4326 |
| GBP | Angol font | 0,67075 |
| SEK | Svéd korona | 9,1451 |
| CHF | Svájci frank | 1,5242 |
| ISK | Izlandi korona | 88,33 |
| NOK | Norvég korona | 8,4365 |
| BGN | Bulgár leva | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Ciprusi font | 0,58150 |
| CZK | Cseh korona | 31,755 |
| EEK | Észt korona | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Magyar Forint | 251,60 |
| LTL | Litván litász/lita | 3,4529 |
| LVL | Lett lats | 0,6570 |
| MTL | Máltai líra | 0,4263 |
| PLN | Lengyel zloty | 4,5236 |
| ROL | Román lej | 40 626 |
| SIT | Szlovén tolar | 239,9900 |
| SKK | Szlovák korona | 39,875 |
| TRL | Török líra | 1 805 300 |
| AUD | Ausztrál dollár | 1,7554 |
| CAD | Kanadai dollár | 1,6343 |
| HKD | Hong Kong-i dollár | 9,4803 |
| NZD | Új-zélandi dollár | 1,9210 |
| SGD | Szingapúri dollár | 2,0901 |
| KRW | Dél-Koreai won | 1 404,45 |
| ZAR | Dél-Afrikai rand | 7,6177 |

Pénznem

Átváltási árfolyam

USD

USA dollár

1,2155

JPY

Japán yen

132,40

DKK

Dán korona

7,4326

GBP

Angol font

0,67075

SEK

Svéd korona

9,1451

CHF

Svájci frank

1,5242

ISK

Izlandi korona

88,33

NOK

Norvég korona

8,4365

BGN

Bulgár leva

1,9559

CYP

Ciprusi font

0,58150

CZK

Cseh korona

31,755

EEK

Észt korona

15,6466

HUF

Magyar Forint

251,60

LTL

Litván litász/lita

3,4529

LVL

Lett lats

0,6570

MTL

Máltai líra

0,4263

PLN

Lengyel zloty

4,5236

ROL

Román lej

40 626

SIT

Szlovén tolar

239,9900

SKK

Szlovák korona

39,875

TRL

Török líra

1 805 300

AUD

Ausztrál dollár

1,7554

CAD

Kanadai dollár

1,6343

HKD

Hong Kong-i dollár

9,4803

NZD

Új-zélandi dollár

1,9210

SGD

Szingapúri dollár

2,0901

KRW

Dél-Koreai won

1 404,45

ZAR

Dél-Afrikai rand

7,6177

---

(1)

Forrás: Az Európai Központi Bank (ECB) átváltási árfolyama.

---
#### PEREZ v STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 84-203 AC

Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Appellate Division, Dade County

November 3, 1986

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Mark Krasnow for appellant.

Janet Reno, State Attorney, and Elizabeth Masters, Assistant State Attorney, for appellee.

Before TENDRICH, BARAD, GOLDMAN, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Perez, as a result of an undercover police operation, was convicted of unlawfully renting a room for the purpose of prostitution. Upon a review of the record on appeal, it is the opinion of this court that the police activity in the instant case constituted entrapment as a matter of law. The police officers’ involvement in the enterprise out of which the charge against the Appellant arose was so extensive that it may be characterized as outrageous. The “criminal conduct” was the *139product of the creative activity of the law-enforcement officers and, but for the police activity engendering the crime, no crime existed. See *Cruz v. State,*465 So.2d 516 (Fla. 1985); *Brown v. State,*484 So.2d 1324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); *Morris v. State,*487 So.2d 291 (Fla. 1986).

Accordingly, the conviction and sentence entered by the trial court are reversed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-41043 Summary Calendar

VERDELL CLAY, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:97-CV-203

- - - - - - - - - - September 16, 1999 Before POLITZ, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Verdell Clay, Texas prisoner # 527757, appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court granted Clay a COA on the following of Clay’s arguments: 1) the evidence was not sufficient to support the jury’s verdict convicting him of possession of heroin; 2) the trial court erred in allowing the introduction of testimony concerning extraneous offenses; andNo. 98-41043 -2- 3) the prosecutor made improper statements during closing arguments. We have reviewed the record, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, and we find no reversible error. The evidence was sufficient to support Clay’s conviction. See Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979). Clay’s challenge to the trial court’s evidentiary rulings on the admission of testimony of extraneous acts does not present a cognizable habeas claim because, even if erroneous, the court’s rulings did not render Clay’s trial fundamentally unfair. See Pemberton v. Collins , 991 F.2d 1218, 1226 (5th Cir. 1993). Similarly, even if the prosecutor’s statements at closing were improper, Clay fails to demonstrate that the misconduct was “persistent and pronounced or that the evidence of guilt was so insubstantial that the conviction would not have occurred but for the improper remarks." Jones v. Butler , 864 F.2d 348, 356 (5th Cir. 1988). We do not reach the other issues raised by Clay because the only issues properly before this court are those on which the district court granted the COA. See Lackey v. Johnson , 116 F.3d 149, 151-52 (5th Cir. 1997). The district court’s judgment denying Clay’s habeas petition is AFFIRMED. Clay’s motion to file a reply brief out of time is DENIED.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
EXHIBIT 10.1

   

 EXHIBIT 10.1
 

 

 March 26, 2015
  
  
 To the GreenPlex Board of Directors:
  
  
 This letter will inform you of my decision to resign as President, CEO, and Director of GreenPlex Corporation, effective today, March 26, 2015.
  
 It has been an honor to serve GreenPlex for one year in the above-mentioned capacities.
  
 I wish you and all the GreenPlex stock holders success with bringing the company to its fullest potential.
  
 Best regards,
  
 Victor T Foia
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer
of Kyocera Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: June 29, 2011



/S/    TETSUO
KUBAName:

Tetsuo KubaTitle:

President and Representative Director(Principal Executive Officer)
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-907

Lower Tribunal No. CF18-006445-XX

_____________________________

RAMON TURNER,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County.

Wm. Bruce Smith, Judge.

February 6, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TRAVER, C.J., and WOZNIAK and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Ann Fitz, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James A. Hellickson, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               JUN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                         (19,273)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,115
<PP&E>                                         545,645
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,901
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 876,731
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          851,365
<BONDS>                                         78,640
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,119
<OTHER-SE>                                    1,952,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    876,721
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                851,415
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (851,415)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (851,415)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (851,415)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (851,415)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.078)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.078)



</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Foreign Service Institutecourse schedule and tuitions.**
 
2012-2013 | 2013-2014 | 2014-2015 | 2015-2016 | 2018-2019
 
SuDoc Number:S 1.114/3-10:
Item Number:0872-A-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000935531
 
March 29, 2018
#### STATE OF FLORIDA ex rel. FLORIDA PUBLISHING COMPANY v AUSTIN, etc.

Case No. 86-17310-CA

Fourth Judicial Circuit, Duval County

December 19, 1986

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Harold B. Wahl, Wahl & Gabel, for petitioner.

John A. Delaney for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

HENRY F. MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS*

This cause coming on to be heard after due notice on Petition for *136Writ of Mandamus filed by Florida Publishing Company to review and photocopy certain public records including pleadings filed by the Respondent in response to a federal grand jury subpoena requesting transcripts of certain state grand jury testimony, responses to Respondent’s pleadings, Motions by other parties, and Court Orders relating to Respondent’s proceedings, and Order to Show Cause entered by this Court December 17, 1986; and

Harold B. Wahl appearing for the Petitioner and John Delaney appearing for the Respondent; and

Respondent having stipulated to the factual allegations of the Petition, and the Court having heard argument of counsel.

Upon consideration, the Court finds:

1. The records sought by Petitioner are public records within the intent and meaning of F. S. 119.011 of the Florida Public Records Act. See *The Tribune CO. v. Cannella*(1984) 458 So.2d 1075; *Florida ex rel Times Publishing v. Pinellas County*(1981) 7 M.L.R. 1091 (CC Pinellas); *Shevin v. Byron, Harless, Etc.*(Fla. 1980) 389 So.2d 633; and *State of Florida ex rel Florida Publishing Company v. Kinard, et al.*(CC Duval, Dec. 12, 1985) 12 M.L.R. 1460.

2. Respondent concedes that the records here are “public records” to which the Petitioner is entitled and that under normal circumstances Respondent would allow Petitioner to inspect and copy the pleadings involved in the matter. However, Respondent is concerned as to whether he might be in some way in contempt of the Federal Court in complying with this request since grand jury proceedings in the Federal Court are sealed and held *in camera.*

3. There has been no showing that the Federal Court officially objects to the Respondent’s furnishing these documents or has ordered they not be produced.

WHEREFORE, since these are public records under the laws of Florida, Respondent be and he is hereby ordered to make available for inspection and copying by Petitioner such documents on or before 2:00 p.m., on December 23, 1986, at the office of Harold B. Wahl, Esquire, attorney for the Petitioner, 920 Barnett Building, Jacksonville, Florida.

*Provided*that if in the interim Respondent is ordered by the Federal Court to withhold such documents, Respondent may immediately petition this Court for review of the situation in the light of such Order.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Jacksonville, Duval County, Florida, this 19th day of December, 1986.
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 184A/17 l

| | ISSN 1725-5228 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 184A |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Tom 4717 lipca 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5228

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 184A

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Tom 4717 lipca 2004

---

| Powiadomienie nr | Spis treśći | Strona |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Powiadomienia |
| | Rada |
| 2004/C 184A/1 | | 1 |

Powiadomienie nr

Spis treśći

Strona

III   Powiadomienia

Rada

2004/C 184A/1

1

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

III Powiadomienia

Rada

| 17.7.2004 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | CA 184/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2004

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

CA 184/1

---

OGŁOSZENIE O KONKURSIE NA WOLNE STANOWISKO

(nr ref. A/014)

DYREKTOR GENERALNY

(2004/C 184 A/01)

Sekretariat Generalny Rady Unii Europejskiej ogłasza konkurs na stanowisko Dyrektora Generalnego w Dyrekcji Generalnej H - Wymiar Sprawiedliwości i Sprawy Wewnętrzne.

Dodatkowe informacje (w języku angielskim i francuskim) oraz formularze zgłoszeniowe są dostępne na stronie internetowej: http://ue.eu.int/concours oraz w dziale rekrutacji, z którym można nawiązać kontakt drogą elektroniczną: service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int

Termin składania wniosków: 3 września 2004 r. (decyduje data stempla pocztowego).

---
1994 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

5-17-1994

Sinnovich v. Port Authority of Allegheny County

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 92-3135

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1994

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1994 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Sinnovich v. Port Authority of Allegheny County" (1994). 1994 Decisions. Paper 17.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1994/17
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

_______________ 

NO. 92-3135 

_______________ 

JUDITH ROSE SINNOVICH, 

 Appellant

v. 

PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY 

_______________ 

On Appeal from the United States District 

Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania 

(D.C. Civil No. 0315-2 : 89-01524) 

_______________ 

PRESENT: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, 

GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, and 

LEWIS, Circuit Judges. 

O R D E R

 After further consideration, the Court hereby vacates 

the order of January 15, 1993 granting rehearing in banc. 

 By the Court, 

 /s/ Dolores K. Sloviter 

 ________________________________ 

 Chief Judge 

 

Dated: May 17, 1994
TO BE PUBLISHED

Supreme Court of Kentucky

2021-SC-0517-KB

KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION MOVANT

V. IN SUPREME COURT

THOMAS DUANE JUANSO RESPONDENT

ORDER

Following this Court’s issuance of a notice of review pursuant to SCR1

3.370(8), and a review of the parties’ briefs filed in support of their respective 

positions, this Court has elected not to adopt the recommendation of the Board 

of Governors resolving the disciplinary proceeding against Thomas Duane 

Juanso. We have previously addressed the factual basis of this matter in an 

opinion and order. Ky. Bar Ass’n v. Juanso, 626 S.W.3d 540 (Ky. 2021). 

Rather than imposing on Juanso a 90-day suspension from the practice of law, 

as recommended by the Board, we believe under the facts of this case, a 180-

day suspension is more fitting. In addition, Juanso is ordered to return 

Blanchard’s file and retainer; attend and successfully complete the Ethics and 

 

1 Kentucky Rules of the Supreme Court.
Professionalism Enhancement Program; and pay all costs associated with this 

action, in the amount of $464.09, as required by SCR 3.450. 

All sitting. Minton, C.J.; Conley, Hughes, Nickell, and VanMeter, JJ., 

concur. Keller and Lambert, JJ., dissent and would have accepted the 

recommendation of the Board of Governors.

ENTERED: March 24, 2022

_______________________________________

CHIEF JUSTICE