alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Kellwood
Company and Subsidiaries Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at April 30,
1998, and from the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings and Condensed
Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended April 30, 1998, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                          31,752
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  331,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,033
<INVENTORY>                                    374,472
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               758,983
<PP&E>                                         190,425
<DEPRECIATION>                                 124,479
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,015,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          342,505
<BONDS>                                        242,720
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       109,657
<OTHER-SE>                                     274,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,015,513
<SALES>                                      1,781,582
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,781,582
<CGS>                                        1,428,812
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,428,812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               249,949
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,524
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 73,947
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             42,747
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    42,747
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.95
        

</TABLE>
§ 1984.107 Hearings. ( a ) Except as provided in this part, proceedings will be conducted in accordance with the rules of practice and procedure for administrative hearings before the Office of Administrative Law Judges, codified at subpart A of part 18 of this title.
( b ) Upon receipt of an objection and request for hearing, the Chief Administrative Law Judge will promptly assign the case to an ALJ who will notify the parties of the day, time, and place of hearing. The hearing is to commence expeditiously, except upon a showing of good cause or unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. Hearings will be conducted de novo on the record. ALJs have broad discretion to limit discovery in order to expedite the hearing.
( c ) If both the complainant and the respondent object to the findings and/or order, the objections will be consolidated and a single hearing will be conducted.
( d ) Formal rules of evidence will not apply, but rules or principles designed to assure production of the most probative evidence will be applied. The ALJ may exclude evidence that is immaterial, irrelevant, or unduly repetitious.
[81 FR 70620, Oct. 13, 2016, as amended at 86 FR 1792, Jan. 11, 2021]
§ 1905.40 Motion for summary decision. ( a ) Any party may, at least 20 days before the date fixed for any hearing under subpart C of this part, move with or without supporting affidavits for a summary decision in his favor on all or any part of the proceeding. Any other party may, within 10 days after service of the motion, serve opposing affidavits or countermove for summary decision. The presiding hearing examiner may, in his discretion, set the matter for argument and call for the submission of briefs.
( b ) The filing of any documents under paragraph (a) of this section shall be with the hearing examiner, and copies of any such documents shall be served in accordance with § 1905.21.
( c ) The hearing examiner may grant such motion if the pleadings, affidavits, material obtained by discovery or otherwise obtained, or matters officially noticed show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that a party is entitled to summary decision. The hearing examiner may deny such motion whenever the moving party denies access to information by means of discovery to a party opposing the motion.
( d ) Affidavits shall set forth such facts as would be admissible in evidence in a proceeding subject to 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557 and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein. When a motion for summary decision is made and supported as provided in this section, a party opposing the motion may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of his pleading; his response must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue of fact for the hearing.
( e ) Should it appear from the affidavits of a party opposing the motion that he cannot for reasons stated present by affidavit facts essential to justify his opposition, the hearing examiner may deny the motion for summary decision or may order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or discovery to be had or may make such other order as is just.
( f ) The denial of all or any part of a motion for summary decision by the hearing examiner shall not be subject to interlocutory appeal to the Assistant Secretary unless the hearing examiner certifies in writing ( 1 ) that the ruling involves an important question of law or policy as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion, and
( 2 ) that an immediate appeal from the ruling may materially advance the ultimate termination of the proceeding. The allowance of such an interlocutory appeal shall not stay the proceeding before the hearing examiner unless the Assistant Secretary shall so order.
# EUR-Lex - 31996R0465 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996R0465

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 465/96 of 14 March 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 2898/95 concerning verification of compliance with quality standards for bananas **

*
Official Journal L 065 , 15/03/1996 P. 0005 - 0005 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 465/96 of 14 March 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 2898/95 concerning verification of compliance with quality standards for bananas

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 of 13 February 1993 on the common organization of the market in bananas (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 3290/94 (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EC) No 2898/95 (3) provides that the rules relating to verification of compliance with quality standards for bananas established by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2257/94 (4) are to enter into force on 1 April 1996; whereas that date of entry into force should be postponed so as to facilitate the implementation of the verification procedures and to complete the dissemination of information to traders;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Bananas,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 2898/95, '1 April 1996` is hereby replaced by '1 July 1996`.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 March 1996.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 47, 25. 2. 1993, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 349, 31. 12. 1994, p. 105.

(3) OJ No L 304, 16. 12. 1995, p. 17.

(4) OJ No L 245, 20. 9. 1994, p. 6.
EXHIBIT 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

 I, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect the period covered by this quarterly
report;

 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 4. The registrant's other certifying officers, if any, and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I(we) have:
         (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report ("Evaluation Date"); and
         (c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

 5. The registrant's other certifying officers, if any, and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):
         (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

 6. The registrant's other certifying officers, if any, and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were any significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: February 13, 2004              S/ Dianne Hatton-Ward
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Dianne Hatton-Ward, CEO & CFO
#### § 460.1 Scope.

This subpart establishes requirements for crew of a vehicle whose operator is licensed or permitted under this chapter.
#### § 1691.4 Standards for investigation, reviews and hearings.

In any investigation, compliance review, hearing or other proceeding, agencies shall consider title VII case law and EEOC Guidelines, 29 CFR parts 1604-1607, unless inapplicable, in determining whether a recipient of Federal financial assistance has engaged in an unlawful employment practice.
[Civ. No. 2468.

Second Appellate District.

December 10, 1917.]

#### THE RINDGE COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent, v. THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Municipal Corporation), et al., Appellants.

Street Assessment—Opening op Street Under Act op 1903—Pro-ceedings op City Council — When Conclusive. — Judgment reversed on authority of *Nutting*v. *City of Los Angeles et al., ante,*p. 519.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Lewis R. Works, Judge.

The facts are the same as those stated in the opinion in *Nutting*v. *City of Los Angeles et al., ante,*p. 519.

Albert Lee Stephens, City Attorney, Charles S. Burnell, Assistant City Attorney, and Arthur M. Ellis, for Appellants.

Edw. F. Wehrle, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

This action was tried together with No. 2391, *Nutting*v. *City of Los Angeles et al., ante,*p. 519, [170 Pac. 680], in which the decision of this court was filed to-day; the two eases being tried upon the same evidence. The opinion written in the Nutting case covers all of the questions which we find it necessary to determine in this case. Upon the authority of that decision, the judgment appealed from herein is reversed.

*810A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on February 7, 1918.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Keystone Consolidated  Industries,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  we,
David L. Cheek,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  and Bert
E. Downing, Jr., Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer,  Corporate Controller
and Treasurer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.




/s/  David L. Cheek                    /s/  Bert E. Downing, Jr.
-------------------------------------  -------------------------
David L. Cheek                         Bert E. Downing, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
March 31,2006                          Corporate Controller and Treasurer
                                       March 31, 2006



Note: The certification  the registrant  furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as
amended,  or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration
Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference,  except as otherwise  expressly
stated in such filing.
#### In the Matter of Altagracia L., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 457]

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), *52entered on or about December 15, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted assault in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and unlawful possession of a weapon by a person under 16, and placed her on probation for a period of 1 year, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility. There was ample evidence to disprove appellant’s defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt, including evidence that appellant sought out the complainant, initiated an altercation with her, struck her, and stabbed her several times with scissors. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.
§ 2200.23 Appearances and withdrawals. ( a ) *Entry of appearance* — ( 1 ) *General.* A representative of a party or intervenor shall enter an appearance by signing the first document filed on behalf of the party or intervenor in accordance with paragraph (a)(2) of this section or subsequently by filing an entry of appearance in accordance with paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
( 2 ) *Appearance in first document or pleading.* If the first document filed on behalf of a party or intervenor is signed by a representative, the representative shall be recognized as representing that party. No separate entry of appearance by the representative is necessary, provided the document contains the information required by § 2200.6.
( 3 ) *Subsequent appearance.* Where a representative has not previously appeared on behalf of a party or intervenor, the representative shall file an entry of appearance with the Executive Secretary, or Judge if the case has been assigned. The entry of appearance shall be signed by the representative and contain the information required by § 2200.6.
( b ) *Withdrawal of counsel.* Any counsel or representatives of record desiring to withdraw their appearance, or any parties desiring to withdraw the appearance of their counsel or representatives of record, must file a motion conforming with § 2200.40 with the Commission or the Judge requesting leave to withdraw, showing that prior notice of the motion has been given by the counsel or representative or party to the client or counsel or representative, as the case may be, and providing current contact information for the client, including street address, email address, and phone number. The motion of counsel to withdraw may, in the discretion of the Commission or the Judge, be denied where it is necessary to avoid undue delay or prejudice to the rights of a party or intervenor.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

VIA EMAIL 

Bruce A. Grahame 

Product Safety and NPS Director 

Next Generation 

230 Industrial Drive 

Lexington, OH 44904 

Dear Mr. Grahame: 

OCT 2 8 2014 

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY 

AND POLLUTION. PREVENTION 

This letter serves as a response to your request (June 2014) to add the Next Generation TIF film 

(DNMULCH), 1.25 mil thickness, to the EPA soil fumigant tarp credit website. 

The EPA has reviewed the laboratory tarp testing data for the Next Generation film (MRID 

49409001) submitted by Pacific Ag Group on behalf ofNext Generation. Based on the 

calculated mass transfer coefficients (MTCs) and the corresponding cut points determined by 

EPA as a basis for assigning buffer zone credits (DP Barcode 385314. Dawson, Smith and 

She lat. "Second Update to Health Effects Division Recommendations for Good Agricultural 

Practices and Associated Buffer Credits. " January 11, 2011), the tarp qualifies for the following 

buffer zone reduction credits: 60% for methyl bromide, 40% for chloropicrin, and 40% for 

chloropicrin and I ,3 -dichloropropene. This tarp is also approved with use of dimethyl disulfide. 

The tarp will be listed on the following EPA websites, http://www2.epa.gov/soil-fumigants/tarps 

and http://www2 .epa .gov /soil-fum iga nts/ta rps-a pproved-use-d imethyl-d isu lfide-d mds-prod ucts, as 

"Next Generation DNMULCH film, 2: 1.25 mil". 

Please contact me at (703) 308-2961 or at schroeder.carolynfa{epa.gov if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

Chemicai 

c~~~J- Review Manager 

Risk Management & Implementation Branch IV 

Pesticide Re-evaluation Division 
Enclosures: DP Barcodes 420912. Biological and Economic Analysis Division. "Tarp Credit 

Request for Soil Fumigants, MRID 49409000, 49409001. ACB Project #B I 4-

43." September 11 , 2014. 

DP Barcode 422866. Health Effects Division. "Concurrence on BEAD Analytical 

Chemistry Branch Review of Permeability Data for 1.25mil DN Mulch by 

Next Generation Films and Classification of Results for Tarp Credit 

Purposes." October 28, 2014.
#### William H. McCabe, Appellant, *v.*Louis H. Gross et al., Constituting the Board of Education of the City of Troy et al., Respondents.

Submitted June 1, 1937;

decided June 8, 1937.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 274 N. Y. 39.)
EXHIBIT 23


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS






          As  independent   public  accountants,  we  hereby   consent  to  the
     incorporation by  reference in the previously  filed Form S-8 Registration
     Statements of KU Energy  Corporation and Kentucky Utilities  Company (File
     Nos. 33-44234 and 33-57087) of our report dated January 29, 1996, included
     in  Kentucky Utilities Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
     1995.




                              /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                              Arthur Andersen LLP

     Chicago, Illinois
     March 8, 1996









                                         -93-
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 38

/

Amendments to Part B.Information Requirements for Disposal Facilities

. 52 FR 23447-23450 .

June 22, 1987

as amended on September 9, 1987, at 52 FR 33936

(Non-HSWA Cluster III)

FEDERAL REOUIREMENT FEDERAL. RCM CITAnoN

ANALOGOUS

• STATE CITATION

1

PART 270 • EPA ADMINISTERED PERMIT PROGRAMS: THE HAZARDOUS

WASTE PERMIT PROGRAM

SUBPART B - PERMIT APPLICATION

CONTENTS OF PART ~: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

reference to

264.9S(h)(5); WAC 173-303-806

written .(4)(a)(xx)(G) X

authorization 270.14(c){7)

add subparagraph

on schedule of WAC 173-303-806

submittal 270.14(cllSllv) . (4)(a)(xx)(H)(iii) X

1Also see technical correction to the rule at 52 FR 33936 (September 9, 1987).

June 22. 1987 • Page 1 of 1
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

              														Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, September 20, 1977.						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1131,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER