alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Part 1 
          - [REG-100163-00] 
          - RIN 1545-AX73 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed rulemaking. 

# SUMMARY:

This document provides notice of cancellation of a public hearing on proposed regulations relating to the application of section 197 to partnerships. 

# DATES:

The public hearing originally scheduled for Wednesday, May 24, 2000, at 10 a.m., is canceled. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Guy R. Traynor of the Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate), at (202) 622-7180 (not a toll-free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 25, 2000, (65 FR 3903), announced that a public hearing was scheduled for May 24, 2000, at 10 a.m., in room 2615, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the public hearing is proposed regulations under section 197 of the Internal Revenue Code. The deadline for requests to speak and outlines of oral comments expired on May 3, 2000.                 

The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing, instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit a request to speak and an outline of the topics to be addressed. As of May 9, 2000, no one has requested to speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for May 24, 2000, is canceled. 

Cynthia E. Grigsby, 

Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).

[FR Doc. 00-12201 Filed 5-15-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### John Cerasole, Respondent, *v.*Anna Egenberger et al., Defendants, and Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, Appellant.

Submitted April 19, 1937,

decided April 27, 1937.

Motion to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 273 N. Y. 351.)
§ 1991.112 Judicial review. ( a ) Within 60 days after the issuance of a final order for which judicial review is available (including a decision issued by the Secretary upon discretionary review), any person adversely affected or aggrieved by the order may file a petition for review of the order in the United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which the violation allegedly occurred or the circuit in which the complainant resided on the date of the violation.
( b ) A final order is not subject to judicial review in any criminal or other civil proceeding.
( c ) If a timely petition for review is filed, the record of the case, including the record of proceedings before the ALJ, will be transmitted by the ARB or the ALJ, as the case may be, to the appropriate court pursuant to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the local rules of such court.
Exhibit 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We  hereby  consent  to the use in the  Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB of Baron
Capital Properties,  L.P. of our report dated February 25, 2000, except for Note
13, as to which the date is April 7, 2000 (which report  contains an explanatory
paragraph  relating  to  substantial  doubt about the  Partnership's  ability to
continue as a going concern) relating to the consolidated  financial  statements
of Baron  Capital  Properties,  L.P. as of December 31, 1999 and for each of the
two years in the period then ended, appearing in such Annual Report.



                                                 RACHLIN COHEN & HOLTZ LLP


Miami, Florida
April 25, 2000
§ 1917.111 Maintenance and load limits. ( a ) The structural integrity of docks, piers, wharves, terminals and working surfaces shall be maintained.
( b ) Maximum safe load limits, in pounds per square foot (kilograms per square meter), of floors elevated above ground level, and pier structures over the water shall be conspicuously posted in all cargo areas.
( c ) Maximum safe load limits shall not be exceeded.
( d ) All walking and working surfaces in the terminal area shall be maintained in good repair.
s1 

s2 

SAFETY

EFFICIENCY

PERFORMANCE

FOR NEAR EARTH FLIGHT

s1 is a fully-integrated, turnkey survey system that 

produces photorealistic 3D imagery of large regions. 

s1 includes a ground station for specification of flight 

plans. All range data and video imagery are collected 

onboard for post-processing. s1 is designed to be used 

with minimal training and a small flight crew for 

flight beyond line-of-sight.

Features & Benefits

• One hour operation with < 10 minute turnaround between 

mission segments

• Flying speeds up to 30 knots

• High accuracy (cm-level) survey-grade laser ranging with

 1 km range

• Very large scanner field-of-view (330 deg)

• Large suite of post-processing tools enable high-fidelity 

3D maps

• Lower accuracy sensor suites available for lower cost 

mapping options

• Collision avoidance upgrade coming in 2016 for beyond 

line-of-sight operations

s1 turnkey survey system

Media inquiries: media@nearearth.aero

All Rights Reserved © 2015 Near Earth Autonomy, Inc.
www.nearearth.aero

All Rights Reserved © 2015 Near Earth Autonomy, Inc.

How to Purchase

Please contact us for any questions about specifications, cost, and delivery.

email: sales@nearearth.aero or call: (412) 621-4300

s1

turnkey survey system

s1 is a complete turnkey survey system with a high-performance laser scanner, IMU, and color camera. 

Range data and color images are position- and time-stamped enabling point cloud registration and 

photorealistic three-dimensional maps.

Collision avoidance available 2016 * Dependent upon laser pulse repetition rate and target reflectance.

 77.32” 

 Ø16.75” 45.5” 

32.6” 

22.95” 

19.2” 

 Ø13.2” 

Application Survey-grade lidar-based mapping

Max speed 30 knots

Flight duration 1 hour

Sensing package Riegl VUX-1, 5 MP Color Camera

Post-processed position, velocity, 

and altitude

Position: < 0.05 m, velocity: 0.010 m/s, roll & pitch: 0.015 deg, 

heading: 0.035 deg

Laser range measurement rate/

Max range/Accuracy/FOV

500,000 points/s / 170 - 920 m* / 10 mm / 330 deg

Sense & avoid availability 2016

Onboard computing Dual core, i5 processor, 2.5 GHz

Wireless radio link range 5 km

Weight (lb.) 55

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110

80 m

100 m

120 m

150 m

200 m

RANGE TO

TARGET

Point Density (points/m2)

Speed (knots)

330° FIELD 

OF VIEW
July 15, 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington, DC 20590 

li4l:rurc 

POST OFFICE BOX 90808 

LAFAYETTE, LOUISIANA 70509 USA 

TELEPHONE: 337 235 2452 

Subject: Request for Extension to Exemption No. 10377 docket number FAA2011-0892. Exemption from Title 14, CFR part 91.411(b) and 91.413(c). 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

Pursuant to Federal Aviation Regulation ("FAR") §11.25, (14 CFR §11.25), PHI, Inc. 

respectfully requests an extension of Exemption No. 10377 docket number FAA-2011-

0892. 

The requested extension of exemption from Title 14, CFR part 91.411 (b) and 91.413(c) 

would allow PHI, Inc. air carrier trained personnel to continue to perform air traffic control 

(ATC) transponder tests and inspections, and the altimeter systems and altimeter 

reporting equipment test and inspections in accordance with the PHI, Inc. Continuous 

Airworthiness Maintenance Program (CAMP) on all PHI 14 CFR, Part 135 aircraft that 

are maintained under the PHI, Inc. Approved Aircraft Inspection Program (AAIP). This 

exemption expires on October 31, 2015. 

The reasons and conditions presented in the original petition dated June 10, 2011, upon 

which the original issuance of Exemption No. 10377 was granted remain unchanged. 

Pursuant to Federal Aviation Regulation ("FAR") §11.83, (14 CFR §11.83), PHI, Inc. also 

requests that the use of this exemption be allowed outside the United States. The 

reasons and conditions for using the exemption outside the United States are the same 

as those for aircraft operating in the United States. 

Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to answering any questions you might 

have. 

Jeffrey 

~Y'YJ-· J. Jenkins 

Chief Inspector Part 135 

PHI, Inc. 

Ph: 337-272-4331 

email: jjenkins@phihelico.com
Request for Information Manuel Lopez and Nicolas Sora (FAA-2015-3650) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Messers Lopez and Soro: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. 

FAA−2015−3650). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your

petition.

z Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closedset filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date 

listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by December 22, 

2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 9:19 AM 

To: droneoftheday@gmail.com
§ 18.90 Closing the record; subsequent motions. ( a ) *In general.* The record of a hearing closes when the hearing concludes, unless the judge directs otherwise. If any party waives a hearing, the record closes on the date the judge sets for the filing of the parties' submissions.
( b ) *Motion to reopen the record.* ( 1 ) A motion to reopen the record must be made promptly after the additional evidence is discovered. No additional evidence may be admitted unless the offering party shows that new and material evidence has become available that could not have been discovered with reasonable diligence before the record closed. Each new item must be designated as an exhibit under § 18.82(a) and accompanied by proof that copies have been served on all parties.
( 2 ) If the record is reopened, the other parties must have an opportunity to offer responsive evidence, and a new evidentiary hearing may be set.
( c ) *Motions after the decision.* After the decision and order is issued, the judge retains jurisdiction to dispose of appropriate motions, such as a motion to award attorney's fees and expenses, a motion to correct the transcript, or a motion for reconsideration.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Enstar Group, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the year December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



/s/ Cheryl D. Davis
--------------------------------------------
Cheryl D. Davis
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Corporate
Taxes, and Secretary
March 15, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE KUHLMAN
1995 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME (LOSS) AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             581
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,195
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,442
<INVENTORY>                                     41,833
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,603
<PP&E>                                         150,493
<DEPRECIATION>                                  84,244
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 214,902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,421
<BONDS>                                         63,653
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,240
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   214,902
<SALES>                                        425,384
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               425,384
<CGS>                                          341,277
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  341,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,211
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,078
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,034
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,044
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,861
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,183
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62
        

</TABLE>
#### Yarbrough *v.*The State.

Crime.

(Decided January 9, 1917.

73 South. 830.)

1. Appeal and Error; Review; Matters Presented. — In the absence of any ruling of the trial court on demurrers to the indictment, no judgment of the trial court thereon being shown, no question is presented for review.

2. Same; Bill of Exceptions. — In the absence of the bill of exceptions the appellate court cannot review intelligibly charges requested by and refused to defendant.

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. A. H. Alston.

Jim Yarbrough was convicted of crime and he appeals.

Affirmed.

J. W. Davidson, for appellant.

W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

PELHAM, P. J.

(1) The transcript shows certain demurrers that were interposed to the indictment, but if any ruling of the trial court was invoked on these demurrers, it is not shown by the judgment entry or anything appearing in the record. Under these conditions, showing no judgment of the trial court on the demurrers, the record presents no question on the demurrers for review *here.*— Peters *v. State,*100 Ala. 10, 14 South. 896 ; *Broadhead v. State,*145 Ala. 681, 40 South. 216; *Powell v. State,*89 Ala. 172, 8 South. 109.

(2) The charges set out in the transcript cannot be reviewed, in the absence of a bill of exceptions, and the record in this case contains nothing purporting to be a bill of *exceptions.*— Clay *v. State,*14 Ala. App. 664, 71 South. 892; *Mitchell v. State, 14*Ala. App. 104, 71 South. 982.

We have examined the entire record and find no error.

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 213 (Thursday, November 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 68257]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28484]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending September 
10, 2011

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0167.
    Date Filed: September 6, 2011.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC COMP Mail Vote 690 Resolution 024d Currency Names, 
Codes, Rounding Units and Acceptability of Currencies--Kyrgyzstan (Memo 
PTC COMP 1647). Intended Effective Date: 1 November 2011.

 Renee V. Wright,
 Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2011-28484 Filed 11-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ David V. Singer
    
    
    
    /s/ Rick D. PuckettDavid V. Singer
President and Chief Executive Officer
February 21, 2008
    
    
    
    Rick D. Puckett
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
February 21, 2008
§ 63.33 Aircraft ratings. ( a ) The aircraft class ratings to be placed on flight engineer certificates are— ( 1 ) Reciprocating engine powered;
( 2 ) Turbopropeller powered; and
( 3 ) Turbojet powered.
( b ) To be eligible for an additional aircraft class rating after his flight engineer certificate with a class rating is issued to him, an applicant must pass the written test that is appropriate to the class of airplane for which an additional rating is sought, and— ( 1 ) Pass the flight test for that class of aircraft; or
( 2 ) Satisfactorily complete an approved flight engineer training program that is appropriate to the additional class rating sought.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  23 LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended
June  30,  2005,  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the  undersigned,
Robert  P.  Johnson, President of AEI Fund Management XXI,  Inc.,
the  Managing Member of the Company, and Patrick W. Keene,  Chief
Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc., each certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              August 5, 2005



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              August 5, 2005
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.1071 Scope and application.

Note:

The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.401 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-1910.401).

[[61 FR 31432](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31432), June 20, 1996]
# L_2005056DE.01003601.xml

| 2.3.2005 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 56/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2005

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 56/36

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1622/2000 der Kommission vom 24. Juli 2000 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1493/1999 über die gemeinsame Marktorganisation für Wein und zur Einführung eines Gemeinschaftskodex der önologischen Verfahren und Behandlungen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 194 vom 31. Juli 2000
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 194 vom 31. Juli 2000

Seite 9, Artikel 25 Absatz 3 zweiter Satz:

anstatt:

anstatt:

„Eine solche Meldung ist nur zulässig, wenn die die Meldung einreichende Person über die einzelnen Anreicherungsmaßnahmen sowie über die in den Meldungen nach Artikel 2 enthaltenen Angaben gemäß Absatz 6 Buch führt.“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„Eine solche Meldung ist nur zulässig, wenn die die Meldung einreichende Person über die einzelnen Anreicherungsmaßnahmen sowie über die in den Meldungen nach Absatz 2 enthaltenen Angaben gemäß Absatz 6 Buch führt.“

---