alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
David M. Kirstein

Direct 202.331.3348 x 224

Fax 202.331.3933

Email dkirstein@yklaw.com

June 10, 2011

By Email Esta Rosenberg, Chief U.S. Carrier Licensing Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Spirit Airlines Application for Re newal/Reinstatement of an Exemption, Detroit, Michigan (DET) – Cancun, Mexico (CUN) (DOT-OST-2004-18692)

Dear Ms. Rosenberg,

Spirit Airlines has completed its poll of the carrier parties served with its application of June 7, 2011 for a renewal/reins tatement of an exemption pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109 for service between Detroi t, Michigan (DET) and Cancun, Mexico (CUN).

Spirit received non-objections from each of the carrier parties served. We request expedited approval of our application.

Respectfully submitted,

David M. Kirstein

cc: Service ListCertificate of Service

I hereby certify that I have this day se rved the foregoing document by email on the following persons:

pmurphy@lopmurphy.com

dan.weiss@coair.com jeff.morgan@delta.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com steve.morrissey@united.com robert.land@jetblue.com

msinick@ssd.com cdonley@ssd.com

anbird@fedex.com kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com efaberman@wileyrein.com howard.kass@usairways.com benjamin.slocum@usairways.com jhill@dlalaw.com mgoldman@sgbdc.com

carl.nelson@aa.com patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com russell.bailey@alpa.org john.allen@faa.gov urskr@state.gov esta.rosenberg@dot.gov brian.hedberg@dot.gov

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com

_______________________ Lyndsey Grunewald
June 10, 2011
NO. 03

- 15

- 00290

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE

THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

RAFAEL HERNANDEZ

- PRADO

, Appellant

vs.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 33rd Judicial District Court

Cause No. 9767A

Burnet County, Texas

The Honorable J. Allan Garrett , Judge Presiding

APPELLANT'S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Gary E. Prust

State Bar No. 24056166

1607 Nueces Street Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 469

- 0092 Fax: (512) 469

- 9102

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ACCEPTED
03-15-00290-CR

6414289
THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS
8/7/2015 6:11:13 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED

APPELLANT’S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE BRIEF

Appellant, Rafael Harnandez

- Prado , file s this, his “ First Motion for

Extension of Time to File Brief,” and in support thereof shows as follows.

I.

1. Appellant's Motion is brought pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P 10.5(b).

2. Appellant has not requested previously an extensi on of time within which to

file his brief.

3. Appel l ant's brief was due on July 30, 2015

.

4. Appellant's attorney had a very busy trial schedule in July and August 2015

.

Counsel has maintained a busy appellate schedule including authoring three

appellate briefs in unrelated appeals during this same time period. Additionally,

Appellant’s attorney had an unexpected death in his immediate fam ily in June

2015 and took time off to manage those affairs.

5. In order to address the issues raised in the present appeal thoroughly,

Appella nt's attorney will require more time to complete his brief

. Appellant’s

attorney will require until September 30, 2015 to complete his brief

.

6. Accordingly, Appellants request that this Court allow him until September

30, 2015 to file his brief.Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Gary Prust

Gary E. Prust

SBN 24056166

1607 Nueces Street Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 469

- 0092 Fax: (512) 469

- 9102 gary@prustlaw.com Attorney for Appellant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE In compliance with Rule 9.5(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the undersigned attorney certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing

Motion was served Mr. Gary Bunyard of the 33 rd and 424 th District Attorney’s

Office via electronic se rvice through efile.txcourts.gov on this 7th day of August

201 5

.

/s/ Gary E Prust Gary E. Prust

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE In compliance with Rule 10.1(a)(5) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the undersigned attorney certifies he conferred with the 33rd and 424th District Attorney’s Office via email communication concerning this motion on the

5 th day of August, 2015.

/s/ Gary Prust Gary E. Prust

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P ROC . 9.4(i )(3), I hereby certify this brief contains 165 words. This is a computer

- generated document created in Microsoft word, using 14

- point typeface. In making this this certificate, I rely on the word county provided by the software use to prepare the document.

/s/ Gary Prust Gary E. Prust
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 57 FR 31451, July 16, 1992.

#### § 20.105 Minimum referral amount.

The IRS annually establishes the minimum amount for debts otherwise eligible for referral. Minimum referral amounts are established separately for individual debts and business debts, as set forth in the memorandum of understanding. The amount referred may include the principal portion of the debt, as well as any accrued interest, penalties and/or administrative cost charges.

[60 FR 41017, Aug. 11, 1995]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR SECOND QUARTER 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH HUADING FINANCIAL NETWORK INC.
</LEGEND>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                    APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                225,515
<SECURITIES>                                       19,212,831
<RECEIVABLES>                                       2,438,347
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    5,587,911
<PP&E>                                                282,995
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     22,671,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 857,336
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                           13,200,000
<OTHER-SE>                                         21,814,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       22,671,625
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         104,660
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (104,660)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (104,660)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.01)



</TABLE>
#### § 102.105 Petitions for declaratory orders; who may file; where to file; withdrawal.

Whenever both an unfair labor practice charge and a representation case relating to the same employer are contemporaneously on file in a Regional Office of the Board, and the General Counsel entertains doubt whether the Board would assert jurisdiction over the employer involved, the General Counsel may file a petition with the Board for a declaratory order disposing of the jurisdictional issue in the case. Such petition may be withdrawn at any time prior to the issuance of the Board's order.

[82 FR 11767, Feb. 24, 2017]
In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting.

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communications Systems (1196).                    

*Date and Time:*                         January 24-25, 2000, 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM.                    

*Place:*                         Room 370, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Rajinder P. Khosla, Program Director, Room 675, Division of Electrical and Communications Systems, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1339.                    

*Minutes:*                         May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate unsolicited proposals submitted in response to the program announcement (NSF 99-2).                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                     

Dated: January 13, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-1236 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### § 1921.11 Postponement or change of place of hearing.

If in the judgment of the hearing examiner convenience or necessity so requires, he may postpone the time or change the place of the hearing.
EX-4.10






Exhibit 4.10




CANCELLATION OF DECLARATION OF TRUST



Reference is made to the declaration of trust (the “Declaration of Trust”) made by                      (“Mr.
X”) and attached hereto as Appendix A.



It is hereby declared and agreed that:





	(1)	 	The Declaration of Trust in relation to the shares of Linkage Technologies International
Holdings Limited (the “Company”) set forth therein and standing in the name of Mr. X in the
books of the Company (“Shares”) shall hereby be cancelled, terminated and revoked with
immediate effect and Mr. X shall hereby be discharged from all duties and obligations under
the Declaration of Trust.






	(2)	 	Mr. X shall transfer the Shares back to the Beneficial Owner (as defined in the Declaration
of Trust) and execute an instrument of transfer in respect of the Shares and deliver all
documents of title in respect of the Shares.






	(3)	 	Each of Mr. X and the Beneficial Owner shall do all such acts, matters and things and execute
all such documents and deeds in order to give effect to the provisions of this Cancellation of
Declaration of Trust, including but not limited to matters relating to the transfer of the
Shares from Mr. X back to the Beneficial Owner.






	(4)	 	This Cancellation of Declaration of Trust shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of
China.






	(5)	 	This Cancellation of Declaration of Trust may be executed in one or more counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the
same instrument.




 









 










IN WITNESS
whereof this Cancellation of Declaration of Trust has been executed this ___ day of
                                        , 2009.




SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED

by




in the presence of:




	 	 	 
	/s/
 

Signature of witness

	 	 






	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

 

Name and address of witness	 	 
	 	/s/   
 

Signature of
	 	 











2









 











SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED BY




	 	 	 
	 

Name of Beneficial Owner

	 	 
	 
	 	 
	/s/
 

Signature of Beneficial Owner
in the presence of:

	 	 
	 
	 	 
	/s/
 

Signature of witness

	 	 
	 
	 	 
	 

Name and address of witness

	 	 











 









 











APPENDIX A




COPY OF DECLARATION OF TRUST
**Exhibit 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of ourreports dated February 23, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and scheduleof The Lamson & Sessions Co., The Lamson & Sessions Co. management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of The Lamson & Sessions Co., included in this Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended December 30, 2006:   Registration  Number Description 033-62443 The Lamson & Sessions Co. Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan333-93251 Form S-8 Registration Statement 333-12585 The Lamson & Sessions Co. Deferred Compensation Plan forNon-Employee Directors Form S-8 Registration Statement 333-46953 The Lamson & Sessions Co. Deferred Savings Plan Form S-8 RegistrationStatement 333-61911 The Lamson & Sessions Co. 1998 Incentive Equity Plan Form S-8333-51330
70

139

64

13

13

Meeker

WHITE RIVER

GLENWOOD SPRINGS

GRAND JUNCTION

White River

National

Forest

White River

National

Forest

Field Office Boundary

Most Geologically Prospective Area

ACEC

Sage-grouse Core or Priority Habitat

Lands With Wilderness Characteristics

Proposed Area Available for Application

for Leasing under 2008 Alternative C

BLM

DOD

USFS

0 5 10

mi

0 10 20

km

OSTS250
EXHIBIT 32.2
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Jupiter Marine International
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Lawrence Tierney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: November 2, 2005

/s/ Lawrence Tierney
--------------------
Lawrence Tierney
Chief Financial Officer
[No. 27119-2-II.

Division Two.

October 18, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Joe Keizer Butler, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 98-1-01681-9, Karen L. Strombom, J., entered March 9, 2001. *Remanded*by unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, A.C.J., concurred in by Houghton and Bridgewater, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 10(ai)
 AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
THE LAMSON & SESSIONS CO.
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
(POST-2004)
        2.21
    
    Trust Agreement shall mean the Trust Agreement or
Agreements between the Company and the Trustee in connection with the
Plan.
   2.22
    
    Trustee shall mean National City Bank, any
corporate successor to a majority of its trust business, or any
successor Trustee hereunder, or any trustee designated by the Company
to hold assets in connection with the Plan.
   4.1
    
    COMPANY MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS. For members of the
Leadership Council who participate in this Plan, the Company will
match 20% of the Annual Incentive Compensation deferred by such
Participant which is hypothetically invested in Common Shares
pursuant to Section 5.4, and use such amount to issue Restricted
Shares (as such term is defined in the 1998 Plan) to the Participant.
Such Restricted Shares will be issued under the 1998
Plan and will be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in
the 1998 Plan.




---



##### 



THE LAMSON & SESSIONS CO.By:
    
    /s/ Eileen E. ClancyEileen E. ClancyIts:
    
    Vice President
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 17

- 00335

- CR

Josiah David LEWIS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR9616

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED April 10, 2019.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
# EUR-Lex - 32000R1194 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R1194

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1194/2000 of 6 June 2000 derogating from Regulation (EC) No 708/98 on the taking over of paddy rice by the intervention agencies and fixing the corrective amounts and the price increases and reductions to be applied, with respect to the period for delivery to the intervention agency in the 1999/2000 marketing year **

*
Official Journal L 134 , 07/06/2000 P. 0029 - 0029 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1194/2000

of 6 June 2000

derogating from Regulation (EC) No 708/98 on the taking over of paddy rice by the intervention agencies and fixing the corrective amounts and the price increases and reductions to be applied, with respect to the period for delivery to the intervention agency in the 1999/2000 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 of 22 December 1995 on the common organisation of the market in rice(1), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2072/98(2), and in particular Article 8(b) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) The conditions for the taking over of paddy rice by the intervention agencies are laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 708/98(3), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 691/1999(4). Article 6(1) of that Regulation provides that delivery must be effected not later than the end of the second month following receipt of the offer and in any case not later than 31 August of the current marketing year.

(2) During the 1999/2000 marketing year the intervention agencies encountered difficulties in setting up a good system for the storage, checking and reception of goods. These difficulties delayed the acceptance of offers made and the taking over of deliveries. For the 1999/2000 marketing year, these difficulties justify a derogation from the time limit set in the abovementioned provisions for delivery to the intervention agency.

(3) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Notwithstanding Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 708/98, delivery of paddy rice for taking over by the intervention agency in respect of the 1999/2000 marketing year must be effected no later than 30 September 2000.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 June 2000.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 329, 30.12.1995, p. 18.

(2) OJ L 265, 30.9.1998, p. 4.

(3) OJ L 98, 31.3.1998, p. 21.

(4) OJ L 87, 31.3.1999, p. 8.
§ 1908.8 Consultant specifications. ( a ) *Number.* ( 1 ) The number of consultant positions which will be funded under a Cooperative Agreement pursuant to this part for the purpose of providing consultation to private sector employers will be determined by the Assistant Secretary on the basis of program performance, demand for services, industrial mix, resources available, and the recommendation of the RA, and may be adjusted periodically.
( 2 ) States shall make efforts to utilize consultants with the safety and health expertise necessary to properly meet the demand for consultation by the various industries within a State. The RA will determine and negotiate a reasonable balance with the State on an annual basis.
( b ) *Qualifications.* ( 1 ) All consultants utilized under Cooperative Agreements pursuant to this part shall be employees of the State, qualified under State requirements for employment in occupational safety and health. They must demonstrate adequate education and experience to satisfy the RA before assignment to work under an Agreement, and annually thereafter, that they meet the requirements set out in § 1908.8(b)(2), and that they have the ability to perform satisfactorily pursuant to the Cooperative Agreement. Persons who have the potential but do not yet demonstrate adequate education and experience to satisfy the RA that they have the ability to perform consultant duties independently may, with RA approval, be trained under a Cooperative Agreement to perform consultant duties. Such persons may not, however, perform consultant duties independently until it has been determined by the RA that they meet the requirements and have the ability indicated. All consultants shall be selected in accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, as amended, entitled “Equal Employment Opportunity.”
( 2 ) Minimum requirements of consultants shall include the following: ( i ) The ability to identify hazards; the ability to assess employee exposure and risk; knowledge of OSHA standards; knowledge of hazard correction techniques and practices; knowledge of workplace safety and health program requirements; and the ability to effectively communicate, both orally and in writing.
( ii ) Consultants shall meet any additional degree and/or experience requirements as may be established by the Assistant Secretary.
( c ) *Training.* As necessary, the Assistant Secretary will specify immediate and continuing training requirements for consultants. Expenses for training which is required by the Assistant Secretary or approved by the RA will be reimbursed in full.
§ 1987.112 Judicial review. ( a ) Within 60 days after the issuance of a final order (including a decision issued by the Secretary upon his or her discretionary review) for which judicial review is available, any person adversely affected or aggrieved by the order may file a petition for review of the order in the United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which the violation allegedly occurred or the circuit in which the complainant resided on the date of the violation.
( b ) A final order is not subject to judicial review in any criminal or other civil proceeding.
( c ) If a timely petition for review is filed, the record of a case, including the record of proceedings before the ALJ, will be transmitted by the ARB or the ALJ, as the case may be, to the appropriate court pursuant to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the local rules of such court.
[81 FR 22539, Apr. 18, 2016, as amended at 85 FR 30626, May 20, 2020]