alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1640.11 EEOC review of deferred charges. ( a ) *Deferral by the EEOC.* When it is determined that a section 504 agency is the agency that shall process a dual-filed complaint or charge under § 1640.8(a)(2) or § 1640.8(e), the EEOC shall defer further action until the section 504 agency takes one of the following actions: ( 1 ) Makes a finding that a violation has not occurred;
( 2 ) Enters into a voluntary compliance agreement;
( 3 ) Following a finding that a violation has occurred, refers the complaint to the Civil Rights Division for judicial enforcement and the Civil Rights Division resolves the complaint;
( 4 ) Following a finding that a violation has occurred, resolves the complaint through final administrative enforcement action; or
( 5 ) Otherwise resolves the charge.
( b ) *Notification of the EEOC.* The section 504 agency shall notify the EEOC upon resolution of any dual-filed complaint or charge.
( c ) *Agency review.* After receipt of notification that the section 504 agency has resolved the complaint, the EEOC shall promptly determine what further action by the EEOC is warranted. In reaching that determination, the EEOC shall give due weight to the section 504 agency's findings and conclusions. If the EEOC proposes to take an action inconsistent with the section 504 agency's findings and conclusions as to whether a violation has occurred, the EEOC shall notify in writing the Assistant Attorney General, the Chairman of the EEOC, and the head of the section 504 agency that processed the complaint. In the written notification, the EEOC shall state the action that it proposes to take and the basis of its decision to take such action.
( d ) *Provision of information.* Upon written request, the section 504 agency shall provide the EEOC with any materials relating to its resolution of the complaint, including its conclusions, investigative reports and files, and any voluntary compliance agreement.
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.554 Overhead hoists. ( a ) *General requirements.* ( 1 ) The safe working load of the overhead hoist, as determined by the manufacturer, shall be indicated on the hoist, and this safe working load shall not be exceeded.
( 2 ) The supporting structure to which the hoist is attached shall have a safe working load equal to that of the hoist.
( 3 ) The support shall be arranged so as to provide for free movement of the hoist and shall not restrict the hoist from lining itself up with the load.
( 4 ) The hoist shall be installed only in locations that will permit the operator to stand clear of the load at all times.
( 5 ) Air hoists shall be connected to an air supply of sufficient capacity and pressure to safely operate the hoist. All air hoses supplying air shall be positively connected to prevent their becoming disconnected during use.
( 6 ) All overhead hoists in use shall meet the applicable requirements for construction, design, installation, testing, inspection, maintenance, and operation, as prescribed by the manufacturer.
( b ) *Specific requirements.* [Reserved]
§ 1471.435 What must I require of a primary tier participant? You as an agency official must require each participant in a primary tier covered transaction to— ( a ) Comply with subpart C of this part as a condition of participation in the transaction; and
( b ) Communicate the requirement to comply with subpart C of this part to persons at the next lower tier with whom the primary tier participant enters into covered transactions.
Scaled RRF - SJV 4k DomainBakersfield - California StreetNH4 NO3 SO4 OC EC OTRQ1 0.78 0.74 0.97 0.74 0.89 0.98Q2 0.71 0.62 0.98 0.81 0.89 0.99Q3 0.68 0.61 0.98 0.83 0.89 0.99Q4 0.79 0.77 0.96 0.73 0.88 0.99Annual2011-2013 STN with SandwichNH4 NO3 SO4 OCMmb EC Crustal Water BlankFilter Mass 2011 2012 2013 2011-13Q1 1.97 5.49 1.14 6.06 0.94 1.53 1.08 0.50 18.71 16.5 19.1 22.1 19.23Q2 0.24 0.00 1.38 3.84 0.43 1.68 0.49 0.50 8.57 9.4 8.3 10.5 9.40Q3 0.30 0.00 1.58 3.41 0.57 3.33 0.57 0.50 10.26 10.8 8.1 14.5 11.13Q4 1.52 4.54 1.20 6.41 1.21 2.12 0.91 0.50 18.42 28.1 16.6 32.8 25.83Annual 1.01 2.51 1.33 4.93 0.79 2.16 0.76 0.50 13.99 16.20 13.03 19.98 16.402018-2020 Controlled PM2.5NH4 NO3 SO4 OCMmb EC Crustal Water BlankFilter Mass 2018 2019 2020 2018-20Q1 1.53 4.07 1.11 4.49 0.83 1.50 0.82 0.50 14.86 13.12 15.17 17.53 15.27Q2 0.17 0.00 1.36 3.10 0.39 1.66 0.49 0.50 7.66 8.39 7.41 9.37 8.39Q3 0.20 0.00 1.55 2.83 0.51 3.29 0.56 0.50 9.44 9.93 7.46 13.32 10.24Q4 1.20 3.48 1.15 4.68 1.07 2.09 0.72 0.50 14.89 22.65 13.42 26.43 20.84Annual 0.78 1.89 1.29 3.77 0.70 2.13 0.65 0.50 11.71 13.52 10.87 16.66 13.68Design ValueFuture Design Value
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Ralph Lisa, Appellant.

Argued March 23, 1937;

decided April 27, 1937.

*Joseph Lonardo, Alfred C. Scuderi, Michael F. Ruggiero*and *Viola lorio*for appellant.

*Charles P. Sullivan, District Attorney {John II. W. Krogmann*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
# EUR-Lex - 31999D0697 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999D0697

**1999/697/EC: Commission Decision of 13 October 1999 amending Commission Decision 97/467/EC drawing up provisional lists of third country establishments from which the Member States authorise imports of rabbit meat and farmed game meat (notified under document number C(1999) 3276) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 275 , 26/10/1999 P. 0033 - 0033 *

COMMISSION DECISION

of 13 October 1999

amending Commission Decison 97/467/EC drawing up provisional lists of third country establishments from which the Member States authorise imports of rabbit meat and farmed game meat

(notified under document number C(1999) 3276)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(1999/697/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decison 95/408/EC of 22 June 1995 on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States are authorised to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products and live bivalve molluscs(1), as last amended by Council Decision 98/603/EC(2) and in particular Article 2(1) and Article 7 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Decision 97/467/EC(3), as last amended by Decision 98/556/EC(4), drew up provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States authorise imports of rabbit meat and farmed game meat; whereas the list of establishments drawn up by the aforementioned Decision does not include establishments producing ratite meat;

(2) the list of third countries from which Member States are authorised to import ratite meat, the animal health conditions and the veterinary certification required for import of this meat in the Community are not established yet;

(3) Member States in accordance with the provisions of Decison 97/467/EC may until 1 October 1999 authorise establishments for import of ratite meat;

(4) the date of 1 October 1999 shall be replaced by 1 October 2000 to allow for further consideration of the arrangements to be applied subsequently, notably in the light of comments made by third countries in accordance with the provisions of Annex B to the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary measures, and with a view to maintaining existing trade;

(5) the measures provided for by this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 1(2a) of Decision 97/467/EC the words "1 October 1999" are replaced by "1 October 2000".

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 October 1999.

For the Commission

David BYRNE

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 243, 11.10.1995, p. 17.

(2) OJ L 289, 28.10.1998, p. 36.

(3) OJ L 199, 26.7.1997, p. 57.

(4) OJ L 266, 1.10.1998, p. 86.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00595-CV

Timothy L. BEATTY,

Appellant

v.

THE PALMS APARTMENTS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CV04587

Honorable Tommy Stolhandske, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 2, 2019

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION 

On December 7, 2018, we issued an order stating the appellant’s brief was overdue and 

that no motion for an extension of time to file the brief had been filed. We ordered appellant to file 

the brief and a written response reasonably explaining appellant’s failure to timely file the brief, 

and stated that if appellant did not comply with our order by December 17, 2018, the appeal may 

be dismissed. See TEX.R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c). Appellant has not filed the brief, a motion 

for an extension of time to file the brief, or any other written response to this court’s order. We 

therefore dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See id.

PER CURIAM
# ADEQ

A R K A N S A S Department of Environmental Quality March 20, 2013 Mr. Ron Curry Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 Dear Mr. Curry: 

## RECEIVED- 6PDL -'IR PLAtniiNG SEC.



## 13**H~R** 

## 28 

## PH 5: 0·1

On September 16,2009, the State ofArkansas submitted a letter certifying that the State Implementation Plan (SIP) fully complies with the requirements ofClean Air Act (CAA) sections IIO(a)(l) and (2) for the 2006 24-hour fine particulate (PM2 5) national ambient air quality standards. This certification includes Arkansas's analysis for the interstate transport requirements ofCAA section IIO(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) requiring that sources within a state do not significantly contribute to the interstate transport ofpollutants that impact nonattainment in, or interfere with maintenance by, any other state with respect to the 2006 PM2.5National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Because the more recent and improved airquality modeling data evaluating interstate transport for the 2006 PM2 5NAAQS conducted by EPA for the Cross State Air Pollution Rule is now available and supports the conclusion that emissions in Arkansas do not significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance ofthe 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS in any other state, we submit it as the basis for ourconclusions in lieu ofthe previous technical information provided. We understand that the Cross State Air Pollution Rule has been vacated by the court butthe technical analysis regarding transport from Arkansas is still relevant and valid. Ifyou have any questions concerning this technical supplement to the September 16,2009, certification, please contact me or Air Division ChiefMike Bates at (50!) 682-0750 or bates@adeg.state.ar.us. Thank you for your consideration ofthis supplemental information. Sincerely,

Teresa Marks, Director ADEQ

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 5301 NORTHSHORE DRIVE I NORTH UTILE ROCK I ARKANSAS 72118-5317 /TELEPHONE 501-682-0744 I FAX 501-682-0880 www.adeq.state.ar.us
The State of New Hampshire 

Department of Environmental Services 

Thomas S. Burack, Commissioner 

Mr. Curt Spaulding 

Regional Administrator 

US EPA 

5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 

Boston, MA 02109-3912 

December 16, 20 13 

Re: Cancellation ofNOx RACT Order ARD-95-002 

Plymouth State University 

1 Fieldhouse Road, Holderness, New Hampshire 

Facility Identification #3300900033 

Dear Mr. Spaulding: 

The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, Air Resources Division ("DES"), has 

completed its review of the request to rescind NOx RACT Order ARD-95-002, submitted on September 17, 2013 

for the Plymouth State University ("PSU") facility located at I Fieldhouse Road, Holderness, NH. As part of the 

application, PSU submitted an application to amend its State Permit to Operate SP-0238 to incorporate the 

modification of the diesel engines from prime power to emergency use only. 

ln 2013, PSU made the decision to purchase all of its electricity for the campus from the grid instead of 

generating a portion of its own electricity. Therefore, the two generators will no longer be used for generating 

electricity on a daily basis, but will be maintained as emergency generators. As emergency generators, they are 

subject to Env-A 1311, Emergency Generators, and these requirements will be specified in the facility's State 

Permit to Operate SP-0238. The requirements in the Order do not apply to emergency generators and, therefore, 

are no longer applicable to the two generators in question. 

Based on the information provided by PSU, DES has made a fmal determination of sufficiency and is 

rescinding the NOx RACT Order issued to PSU. Please contact Patricia North at patricia.north@des.nh.gov or by 

calling (603) 271-0901 if you have any questions regarding the rescission ofthe NOx RACT Order. 

CAW/prn 

By certified mail# 7011 1570 0003 6777 9041 

cc: D. Dahl, US EPA Region I (via email) 

E. Shippee, Plymouth State University 

D. Perrin, Plymouth State University 

T. Donnelly, POWER Engineers, Inc. 

Town of Holderness 

Sincerely, 

Director 

Air Resources Division 

www.des.nh.gov 

29 Hazen Drive • PO Box 95 • Concord, NH 03302-0095 

(603) 271-3503 • TDD Access: Relay NH 1-800-735-2964
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended April 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, D. Michael Parker, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | such Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended April 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended April 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: July 12, 2006



/S/    D. MICHAEL PARKERD. Michael Parker Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          64,941
<SECURITIES>                                 1,431,262
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,111,791
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,241,645
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,691,929
<PP&E>                                       4,995,310
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,473,279
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,693,348
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       124,926
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,424,445
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,473,279
<SALES>                                      9,913,885
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,913,885
<CGS>                                        8,006,668
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,006,668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,876,136
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             204,322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (164,646)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (164,646)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (164,646)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
# L_2004270EN.01001801.xml

| 18.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 270/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 270/18

---

Corrigendum to Council Directive 98/20/EC of 30 March 1998 amending Directive 92/14/EEC on the limitation of the operation of aeroplanes covered by Part II, Chapter 2, Volume 1 of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, second edition (1988)

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities L 107 of 7 April 1998
  )

On page 6, in the first sentence of Article 2:

for:

for:

‘Member States shall lay down the system of penalties for breaching the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive and shall take all the measures necessary to ensure that those penalties are applied.’,

read:

read:

‘Member States shall lay down the system of penalties for breaching the national provisions adopted in order to comply with Directive 92/14/EEC and shall take all the measures necessary to ensure that those penalties are applied.’.

---
#### TAITE v. THE STATE.

(Decided November 21, 1916.)

Appeal from Monroe Law and Equity Court.

Heard before Hon. W. G. McCorvey.

No counsel marked for appellant.

W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed on motion of Attorney General.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 10.36

                       [Kewaunee Scientific Letterhead]

September 17, 1996


Mr. D. Michael Parker
140 Colony Drive
Mooresville, NC  28115

     Re:  Employment Security Agreement

Dear Mike:

Recently, you had expressed concern about your job security, in the event of
Kewaunee being acquired by another company.  You have asked for special
consideration because when companies are acquired, the acquired company
frequently does not need "duplicate" positions such as yours.

Further, we recognize that Kewaunee's continued success depends, to a
significant degree, on the skill and competence of key managers such as
yourself.

Therefore, in consideration of your request for job security and your continued
employment, the Board of Directors has approved this employment agreement as
follows:

If the Company is acquired, and you are terminated without cause within two
years after the acquisition, the Company will pay you separation pay equal to
your then current base salary, for six months.  If you should obtain income from
another employer while receiving separation payments, any such payments from
Kewaunee will be reduced in like amount.

After any termination of employment, the separation payments will not continue
the employment relationship.  However, as long as you are receiving separation
payments, your health care coverage will continue per the plan document.

If you agree with the above employment security agreement, please sign below.

Sincerely,

/s/ Eli Manchester, Jr.

Eli Manchester, Jr.
President, Chief Executive Officer


Accepted:   /s/ D. Michael Parker
            ---------------------
                D. Michael Parker

Date:  9-17-96
     ---------------
Cite as 2021 Ark. 237



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

IN RE SUPREME COURT

COMMI TTEE ON AUTOMATION Opinion Delivered: December 16, 2021

PER CURIAM

Grace Gault, District Court Clerk

, of Mena ; Representative Robin Lundstr u m , of

Springdale ; Honorable Sarah Capp, District Judge , of Ozark ; Rashauna Norment

, attorney,

of Little Rock ; and Honorable Rob Wyatt, Circuit Judge, of Pine Bluff are appointed to the

Arkansas Supreme Court Commi ttee on Automation for a three

- year term to expire on

Decemb er 31, 2024. We reappoint Ca ndace Edwards , Craighead County Circuit Clerk, of

Jonesboro for a three

-

year term to expire on December 31, 2024.

The court express es its gratitude to the following outgoing members for their years of

valuable service to this commission : Dena Ross, District Court Clerk, of Mena ; Scott Braden,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, of Little Rock ; James Kingsbury, Arkansas State Police ;

and Honorable Alex Guynn, Circuit Judge , of Pine Blu ff

.