alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 22


                                RYMER FOODS INC.

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

                                OCTOBER 28, 1995

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                       State of        Percent
     Subsidiary Name                 Incorporation      Owned          Owner
     ---------------                 -------------     -------   ----------------
     <S>                             <C>               <C>       <C>
     Rymer Meat Inc.                    Illinois         100     Rymer Foods Inc.

     Rymer Chicken Inc. (1)             Arkansas         100     Rymer Meat Inc.

     Rymer International
      Seafood Inc. (2)                  Illinois         100     Rymer Meat Inc.

     Rymer Chicken Inc. - Plant City    Florida          100     Rymer Meat Inc.

     Queen City Foods Inc.              Georgia          100     Rymer Meat Inc.
</TABLE>


(1)  Substantially all of the assets of Rymer Chicken Inc. were sold on December
     10, 1993.  See Item 1 and Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)  The Company announced on January 5, 1996 that it had signed an agreement in
     principle to sell the assets of Rymer International Seafood Inc.  See Item
     1 and Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Knickerbocker Village Inc. Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              517,751
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       427,174
<ALLOWANCES>                                        308,000
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2,202,852
<PP&E>                                            7,608,186
<DEPRECIATION>                                      531,340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   11,229,478
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2,783,893
<BONDS>                                           5,969,424
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            317,048
<OTHER-SE>                                        1,489,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     11,229,478
<SALES>                                          10,537,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 10,619,614
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    10,205,718
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  539,711
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     413,896
<INCOME-TAX>                                        203,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 210,896
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        210,896
<EPS-BASIC>                                            1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0



</TABLE>
§ 1988.103 Filing of retaliation complaint. ( a ) *Who may file.* A person who believes that he or she has been discharged or otherwise retaliated against by any person in violation of MAP-21 may file, or have filed by any person on his or her behalf, a complaint alleging such retaliation.
( b ) *Nature of filing.* No particular form of complaint is required. A complaint may be filed orally or in writing. Oral complaints will be reduced to writing by OSHA. If the complainant is unable to file the complaint in English, OSHA will accept the complaint in any language.
( c ) *Place of filing.* The complaint should be filed with the OSHA office responsible for enforcement activities in the geographical area where the complainant resides or was employed, but may be filed with any OSHA officer or employee. Addresses and telephone numbers for these officials are set forth in local directories and at the following Internet address: *http://www.osha.gov .*
( d ) *Time for filing.* Within 180 days after an alleged violation of MAP-21 occurs, any person who believes that he or she has been retaliated against in violation of the MAP-21 may file, or have filed by any person on his or her behalf, a complaint alleging such retaliation. The date of the postmark, facsimile transmittal, electronic communication transmittal, telephone call, hand-delivery, delivery to a third-party commercial carrier, or in-person filing at an OSHA office will be considered the date of filing. The time for filing a complaint may be tolled for reasons warranted by applicable case law. For example, OSHA may consider the time for filing a complaint to be tolled if a complainant mistakenly files a complaint with an agency other than OSHA within 180 days after an alleged adverse action.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000861388
<NAME> LG&E ENERGY CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    3,413,054
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    752,493
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         705,719
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       262,491
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,133,757
<COMMON>                                       775,323<F1>
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        (266)<F2>
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            366,234
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,141,291
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    135,328
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,299,415
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             449,578
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  411,810
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,696,335
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                5,133,757
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    2,707,276
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           133,524
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,224,728<F3>
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,358,252
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        349,024
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                           (154,907)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 194,117
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       125,309
<NET-INCOME>                                    68,808
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      6,757
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   62,051
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       162,096
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       69,011
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         343,328
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48
<FN>
<F1>Includes common stock expense of $1,690.
<F2>Represents unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of taxes.
<F3>Includes equity in earning of affiliates of $49,717.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# Natural Gas Adoption Increases Slowly, ACT Reports
September 17, 2014

A natural gas fueling station getting ready to open. 

### Photo: Evan Lockridge ACT Research published a new report that shows natural gas adoption in the heavy-duty truck market has grown but at a slower rate than predicted. In 2014, natural-gas-powered trucks had continued growth in unit sales, but the rate was about the same as the growth in the truck market as a whole. Sales for 2014 are expected to total 11,000 units, which is up 27% from 2013. "Expectations have fallen from our initial analysis," said Ken Vieth, general manager at ACT. "Factors contributing to the shifting ROI results include the price of diesel and meaningful improvements in overall fuel economy." The report also found that the large price gap between natural gas and diesel vehicles and early stage infrastructure build-out remain barriers for the market.

### "The chicken and egg issue of infrastructure is being solved, albeit slowly, but the price of

natural-gas-powered equipment still needs to be addressed, and this won't be solved overnight," said Vieth. "That's why we call it an evolution and not a revolution." The study also asked trucking industry leaders to look to the longer term future of natural gas and offered insights based on extensive interviews, research and analysis. Participants in the study included manufacturers, suppliers, fleet operators, the fueling industry and other interested parties.
EXHIBIT 32.1






Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The undersigned, Sherry Couturier, CFO of American International Industries, Inc., a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly
Report of Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009.






The undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all respects, the financial condition of American International Industries, Inc. and results of its operations.






Date:  November 13, 2009


Sherry Couturier


CFO


/s/ Sherry Couturier
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1904](/current/title-29/part-1904?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

At [82 FR 20548](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/82-FR-20548), May 3, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and [Public Law 115-21](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/plaw/115/public/21), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration removed all amendments to part 1904 published at [81 FR 91792](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/81-FR-91792), Dec. 19, 2016.

#### § 1904.0 Purpose.

The purpose of this rule (part 1904) is to require employers to record and report work-related fatalities, injuries, and illnesses.

Note to [§ 1904.0](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-1904.0):

Recording or reporting a work-related injury, illness, or fatality does not mean that the employer or employee was at fault, that an OSHA rule has been violated, or that the employee is eligible for workers' compensation or other benefits.

[[82 FR 20548](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/82-FR-20548), May 3, 2017]
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROBERT CROYSDILL, 

 

 Appellant,

v.

OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00191-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 6

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2013-DCV1136)

O R D E R

On the Court’s own motion, and pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 39.1, the Court finds that oral 

argument in the above styled and numbered cause would not materially aid in the disposition of 

this cause, therefore, this case is scheduled to be submitted without oral argument on January 27, 

2023. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 10

th day of January, 2023.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
**EX-99.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Terry G. Roussel, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge the Quarterly Report ofCornerstone Realty Fund, LLC on Form 10-Q for the three month period endedMarch 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchForm 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition andresults of operations of Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC.

 
|                     | /s/ Terry G. Roussel                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  May 15, 2003 | Terry G. Roussel  Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  of Cornerstone Ventures, Inc.,  the  Manager of  Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC, the Managing  Member of Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC |

 

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.106 Working over or near water. ( a ) Employees working over or near water, where the danger of drowning exists, shall be provided with U.S. Coast Guard-approved life jacket or buoyant work vests.
( b ) Prior to and after each use, the buoyant work vests or life preservers shall be inspected for defects which would alter their strength or buoyancy. Defective units shall not be used.
( c ) Ring buoys with at least 90 feet of line shall be provided and readily available for emergency rescue operations. Distance between ring buoys shall not exceed 200 feet.
( d ) At least one lifesaving skiff shall be immediately available at locations where employees are working over or adjacent to water.
§ 49.63 Eligibility for Authorization for Transmission to the International Registry: general requirements. ( a ) To send information to the International Registry with respect to a civil aircraft of the United States, an aircraft for which a U.S. identification number has been assigned, or an aircraft engine, a person requesting a unique authorization code from the FAA Aircraft Registry must comply with the following: ( 1 ) File a completed AC Form 8050-135 with the FAA Aircraft Registry; and
( 2 ) For civil aircraft of the United States, file with the FAA Aircraft Registry any documents representing the transaction that meet the requirements of subpart C of this part; or
( 3 ) For aircraft engines, file with the FAA Aircraft Registry any documents representing the transaction that meet the requirements of subpart D of this part.
( b ) Nothing in this section requires transmittal of information relating to aircraft engines to the International Registry through the FAA Aircraft Registry.
#### Dare v. Henderson

*George KunJcel,*for plaintiffs.

*Bruce E. Cooper,*for defendants.

February 16, 1959.

Kreider, J.,

— We have before us plaintiffs’ motion for approval of arbitrators’ award, which was filed under section 1 of the Act of June 13, 1957, P. L. 302, which amended the old Arbitration Act of June 16, 1836, P. L. 715, by adding *694thereto section 34.1, 5 PS §58.1. The effect of sustaining this motion would be to strike off an appeal filed by C. W. Henderson, one of defendants, from an award made in favor of plaintiffs and against Henderson and Hazel L. Lauver in the amount of $777.96. The latter did not appeal. Plaintiffs contend Henderson’s appeal is fatally defective because his recognizance in support thereof was not filed until one and one-half months after the appeal period of 20 days had expired and therefore plaintiffs say their motion must be sustained. The docket entries in this case show the following :

June 2, 1958 — Award of arbitrators filed.

June 19,1958 — Appeal from the award of the board of arbitrators filed in behalf of C. W. Henderson, defendant no. one, filed with appeal affidavit.

June 19, 1958 — Costs $50.70 paid, plus $100 appeal.

August 5, 1958 — A bond on appeal of arbitration award filed.

September 8, 1958 — Motion for approval of arbitrators’ award filed.

It will be noted that the recognizance was filed August 5, 1958, more than one month *before*plaintiffs’ motion for approval of arbitrators’ award was filed and that by that time appellant Henderson had done everything required by the arbitration act to perfect his appeal. Plaintiffs contend, however, that Henderson was too late in filing his recognizance and that this was a defect which could not be remedied. We cannot agree. The record shows, as above stated, that Henderson filed his appeal and paid $50.70 costs which had accrued and in addition $100 to reimburse the county for the arbitrators’ fees within the appeal period. Furthermore, he filed the recognizance in question one and one-half months thereafter, which in turn was a month and three days before plaintiffs filed the instant motion for approval of the arbitrators’ award. We think *695plaintiffs have not suffered any substantial harm and that under all the circumstances in this case, to deny Henderson the right of appeal and a trial by jury would impose an undue hardship upon him and would not be in accord with the spirit of the decision of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in the Smith Case, 381 Pa. 223, 230, 231 (1955). See also Stanley Distributing Co. v. Fetterhoff, 69 Dauph. 60 (1956), and Latsha v. Lahr, 27 Northumb. 156 (1955).

Consequently, we are constrained to dismiss plaintiffs’ motion and to allow the appeal. It is so ordered.
#### § 215.8 Department of Labor contact.

Questions concerning the subject matter covered by this part should be addressed to Chief, Division of Statutory Programs, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; phone number 202-693-0126 or e-mailed to *OLMS-TransitGrant@dol.gov.*

[64 FR 40995, July 28, 1999, as amended at 73 FR 47057, Aug. 13, 2008]
# EUR-Lex - 31998R0739 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998R0739

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 739/98 of 1 April 1998 amending Regulation (EC) No 2331/97 on special conditions for granting export refunds on certain pigmeat products **

*
Official Journal L 102 , 02/04/1998 P. 0022 - 0022 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 739/98 of 1 April 1998 amending Regulation (EC) No 2331/97 on special conditions for granting export refunds on certain pigmeat products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in pigmeat (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 3290/94 (2), and in particular Articles 13(12) and 22 thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EC) No 2331/97 (3) lays down quality criteria to be met when export refunds are granted on certain processed pigmeat products;

Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 of 17 December 1987 establishing an agricultural product nomenclature for export refunds (4), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 409/98 (5), established a list of products on which export refunds can be granted in the pigmeat sector;

Whereas the product codes in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2331/97 must be brought into line with recent amendments to Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 applicable from 4 March 1998;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Pigmeat,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2331/97, the product codes '1601 00 91 9100` and '1601 00 99 9100` are hereby replaced by '1601 00 91 9000` and '1601 00 99 9190` respectively.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 April 1998.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 282, 1. 11. 1975, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 349, 31. 12. 1994, p. 105.

(3) OJ L 323, 26. 11. 1997, p. 19.

(4) OJ L 366, 24. 12. 1987, p. 1.

(5) OJ L 55, 25. 2. 1998, p. 1.