alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               7
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   632
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              300
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        85,500
<OTHER-SE>                                    (82,460)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,340
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,194)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,214)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,980)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.001)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23

                         Consent of Independent Accountants

          We consent to the incorporation by reference in the  registration
          statements of Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. on Form  S-8
          (File Nos. 33-30137,  33-63086 and 2-93666)  of our report  dated
          February 28, 1997  on our  audits of  the consolidated  financial
          statements  and   financial   statement  schedule   of   Keystone
          Consolidated Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31,
          1996 and 1995 and for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and
          1994, which report is included in this Annual Report on form 10-K

          Dallas, Texas
          April 14, 1997
§ 1983.106 Objections to the findings and the preliminary order and requests for a hearing. ( a ) Any party who desires review, including judicial review, of the findings and/or preliminary order, or a respondent alleging that the complaint was frivolous or brought in bad faith who seeks an award of attorney's fees under CPSIA, must file any objections and/or a request for a hearing on the record within 30 days of receipt of the findings and preliminary order pursuant to § 1983.105. The objections, request for a hearing, and/or request for attorney's fees must be in writing and state whether the objections are to the findings, the preliminary order, and/or whether there should be an award of attorney's fees. The date of the postmark, facsimile transmittal, or electronic transmittal is considered the date of filing; if the objection is filed in person, by hand-delivery or other means, the objection is filed upon receipt. Objections must be filed with the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Department of Labor, in accordance with 29 CFR part 18, and copies of the objections must be served at the same time on the other parties of record, the OSHA official who issued the findings and order, the Assistant Secretary, and the Associate Solicitor, Division of Fair Labor Standards, U.S. Department of Labor.
( b ) If a timely objection is filed, all provisions of the preliminary order will be stayed, except for the portion requiring preliminary reinstatement, which will not be automatically stayed. The portion of the preliminary order requiring reinstatement will be effective immediately upon the respondent's receipt of the findings and preliminary order, regardless of any objections to the order. The respondent may file a motion with the Office of Administrative Law Judges for a stay of the Assistant Secretary's preliminary order of reinstatement, which shall be granted only based on exceptional circumstances. If no timely objection is filed with respect to either the findings or the preliminary order, the findings and/or the preliminary order will become the final decision of the Secretary, not subject to judicial review.
[77 FR 40503, July 10, 2012, as amended at 86 FR 1791, Jan. 11, 2021]
#### KEMPER v HELM et

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9045.

Decided March 18, 1929

Boer, Arnold & Tobias, Cleveland, for Kemper.

Bernon, Mulligan, Keeley & LeFever, Cleveland, for Helm et.

*266VICKERY, J.

Without going into the question as to whether the whole law is constitutional or not, for one might well say that the power to limit the right of persons to contract might well be questioned, if the legislature in its hurry or otherwise in passing a law which required the real estate dealers to have a license before they could operate and then failed to provide the machinery whereby they could get a license, and no licénse of any kind could be obtained, so that no person could recover compensation for selling real estate notwithstanding his contract, because he did not have a license when none was procurable, nor was a commission appointed which was the sole source of issuing licenses, I say, it would put our law in a strange situation indeed.

The legislature makes a condition which prevents a 'man from carrying on his trade without complying with that condition, and then does not provide the means, or neglects to provide the means whereby he can comply with the condition. The legislature by its own act made it impossible for the plaintiff or any other real estate man to comply with the conditions of the law. Therefore, the law was ineffectual and without force at the time when this act was performed and the commission earned.

We think the court erred in sustaining this demurrer, and the case will be reversed for the reason that the court sustained this demurrer when it should have been overruled; and be remanded to the, Common Pleas Court with directions to overrule the demurrer.

Sullivan and Levine, JJ, concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEPTEMBER
30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>



<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         705,755
<SECURITIES>                                 1,160,828
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,196,296
<ALLOWANCES>                                   128,357
<INVENTORY>                                  1,272,973
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,594,142
<PP&E>                                       4,912,234
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,499,025
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,612,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,170,807
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       124,971
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,612,130
<SALES>                                     10,913,870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,913,870
<CGS>                                        8,647,569
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,647,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,012,502
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             140,249
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (570,891)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (570,891)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (1,331,554)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,839,445)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)






</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 21


PARENTS AND SUBSIDIARIES

The Company and its subsidiaries* as of April 2, 2001 are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        State (Country) of                 Percentage of Voting
Name of Company                                           Incorporation                      Securities Owned
---------------                                         ------------------                 --------------------

<S>                                                     <C>                                      <C>
Kellwood Company                                        Delaware                                 Parent
American Recreation Products, Inc.                      Delaware                                   100%
Kellwood Asia Limited                                   Hong Kong                                  100%
Smart Shirts Limited                                    Hong Kong                                  100%
South Asia Garment Limited                              Hong Kong                                  100%
KWD Holdings, Inc.                                      Delaware                                   100%
Robert Scott & David Brooks
  Outlet Stores, Inc.                                   Delaware                                   100%
Tri-W Corporation                                       North Carolina                             100%
Halmode Apparel, Inc.                                   Delaware                                   100%
Koret of California, Inc.                               California                                 100%
Biflex International, Inc.                              New York                                   100%
Kellwood Financial Resources, Inc.                      Tennessee                                  100%
Kellwood Shared Services, Inc.                          Delaware                                   100%
Dorby Frocks, Ltd.                                      New York                                   100%
Group B Clothing Co., Inc.                              Delaware                                   100%

<FN>
*    Some of the above subsidiaries also have subsidiaries which are not
     listed because, in the aggregate, they are not considered to be
     significant.
</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.2 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Citizens First
      Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report") I, Steve Marcum, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











By:
            /s/
                Steve MarcumSteve
                MarcumChief
                Financial OfficerDate:
            August
                14, 2007
fs1nov09ex10xxviii_celsius.htm


    Exhibit
10.28

     

    


    ADDENDUM
TO REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENTS

     

    THIS
ADDENDUM dated as of November 16, 2009 shall modify those certain registration
rights agreements referenced herein by and between CELSIUS HOLDINGS, INC., a
Nevada corporation (the “Company”)
and CDS VENTURES OF SOUTH FLORIDA, LLC,  a Florida limited liability
company (the “Investor”).

     

    WHEREAS,
the Company and Investor entered into certain registration rights agreements as
more fully described herein, and

     

     WHEREAS,
the Company and Investor wish to amend the said registration rights agreements
pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Addendum.

     

    NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained
herein, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as
follows:

     

    1.           The
Company and Investor hereby agree to modify each of the following
agreements:

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              a.

            	
              Registration
      Rights Agreement dated August 8,
2008;

            


    

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              b.

            	
              Registration
      Rights Agreement dated December 12, 2008;
and

            


    

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              c.

            	
              Registration
      Rights Agreement dated September 8,
2009

            


    

    


    (collectively,
the “Registration Rights Agreements”) as follows:

    


    The term
“Filing
Deadline” shall mean thirty (30) days from written request from the
Investor to file a Registration Statement.

    


    The term
“Registration
Deadline” means one hundred eighty (180) days after the Filing Deadline
date.

    2.           Notwithstanding
any contrary term in any of the Registration Rights Agreements, Investor may
make multiple requests to the Company to file Registration Statements each of
which may contain any number of shares determined by the Investor in its sole
discretion.

    


    3.           All
other terms and conditions remain the same.

    


    [signature
page follows]

     

     

    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

    
 

    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly caused this Addendum to be
executed and delivered on the date first above written.

    


    


    CELSIUS
HOLDINGS, INC.

    


    


    By:           /s/ Jan
Norelid            

    Name: Jan Norelid

    Title: Chief Financial
Officer

    


    


    CDS
VENTURES OF SOUTH FLORIDA, LLC

    


    


    


    By:           /s/ William H. Milmoe         

                   
Name:  William H. Milmoe

                   
Title:  Manager
EXHIBIT 31.4



MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION



I, Alexander W. Pease, certify that:



| | 1. | I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Snyder’s-Lance, Inc.; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 19, 2018



|/s/ Alexander W. Pease                            | 
|------------------------------------------------- | 
|Alexander W. Pease                                | 
|Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
# EUR-Lex - 31997D0734 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31997D0734

**97/734/EC: Commission Decision of 15 October 1997 amending Decision 97/107/EC authorizing methods for grading pig carcases in Belgium (Only the French and Dutch texts are authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 294 , 28/10/1997 P. 0006 - 0006 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 15 October 1997 amending Decision 97/107/EC authorizing methods for grading pig carcases in Belgium (Only the French and Dutch texts are authentic) (97/734/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 of 13 November 1984 determining the Community scale for grading pig carcases (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 3513/93 (2), and in particular Article 5 (2) thereof,

Whereas, by Decision 97/107/EEC of 16 January 1997 (3), the Commission authorized two methods for grading pig carcases in Belgium; whereas, however, Belgium was authorized to apply the method for grading pig carcases provided for by Decision 88/184/EEC (4) until 31 October 1997 in order to permit a smooth transition between the old and the new methods;

Whereas the Belgian authorities have asked the Commission to extend that period by one year in order to permit the development and use of additional assessment criteria, relating, in particular, to the conformity of carcases;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Pigmeat,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 4 of Decision 97/107/EC, the date '31 October 1997` is hereby replaced by '31 October 1998`.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium.

Done at Brussels, 15 October 1997.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 301, 20. 11. 1984, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 320, 22. 12. 1993, p. 5.

(3) OJ L 39, 8. 2. 1997, p. 17.

(4) OJ L 83, 29. 3. 1988, p. 40.
#### § 1981.113 Judicial enforcement.

Whenever any person has failed to comply with a preliminary order of reinstatement or a final order or the terms of a settlement agreement, the Secretary or a person on whose behalf the order was issued may file a civil action seeking enforcement of the order in the United States district court for the district in which the violation was found to have occurred.
§ 18.15 Substitution of administrative law judge. ( a ) *Substitution during hearing.* If the judge is unable to complete a hearing, a successor judge designated pursuant to § 18.12 may proceed upon certifying familiarity with the record and determining that the case may be completed without prejudice to the parties. The successor judge must, at a party's request, recall any witness whose testimony is material and disputed and who is available to testify again without undue burden. The successor judge may also recall any other witness.
( b ) *Substitution following hearing.* If the judge is unable to proceed after the hearing is concluded, the successor judge appointed pursuant to § 18.12 may issue a decision and order based upon the existing record after notifying the parties and giving them an opportunity to respond. Within 14 days of receipt of the judge's notice, a party may file an objection to the judge issuing a decision based on the existing record. If no objection is filed, the objection is considered waived. Upon good cause shown, the judge may order supplemental proceedings.
§ 63.35 Knowledge requirements. ( a ) An applicant for a flight engineer certificate must pass a written test on the following: ( 1 ) The regulations of this chapter that apply to the duties of a flight engineer.
( 2 ) The theory of flight and aerodynamics.
( 3 ) Basic meteorology with respect to engine operations.
( 4 ) Center of gravity computations.
( b ) An applicant for the original or additional issue of a flight engineer class rating must pass a written test for that airplane class on the following: ( 1 ) Preflight.
( 2 ) Airplane equipment.
( 3 ) Airplane systems.
( 4 ) Airplane loading.
( 5 ) Airplane procedures and engine operations with respect to limitations.
( 6 ) Normal operating procedures.
( 7 ) Emergency procedures.
( 8 ) Mathematical computation of engine operations and fuel consumption.
( c ) Before taking the written tests prescribed in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, an applicant for a flight engineer certificate must present satisfactory evidence of having completed one of the experience requirements of § 63.37. However, he may take the written tests before acquiring the flight training required by § 63.37.
( d ) An applicant for a flight engineer certificate or rating must have passed the written tests required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section since the beginning of the 24th calendar month before the month in which the flight is taken. However, this limitation does not apply to an applicant for a flight engineer certificate or rating if— ( 1 ) The applicant— ( i ) Within the period ending 24 calendar months after the month in which the applicant passed the written test, is employed as a flight crewmember or mechanic by a U.S. air carrier or commercial operator operating either under part 121 or as a commuter air carrier under part 135 (as defined in part 298 of this title) and is employed by such a certificate holder at the time of the flight test;
( ii ) If employed as a flight crewmember, has completed initial training, and, if appropriate, transition or upgrade training; and
( iii ) Meets the recurrent training requirements of the applicable part or, for mechanics, meets the recency of experience requirements of part 65; or
( 2 ) Within the period ending 24 calendar months after the month in which the applicant passed the written test, the applicant participated in a flight engineer or maintenance training program of a U.S. scheduled military air transportation service and is currently participating in that program.
( e ) An air carrier or commercial operator with an approved training program under part 121 of this chapter may, when authorized by the Administrator, provide as part of that program a written test that it may administer to satisfy the test required for an additional rating under paragraph (b) of this section.
(Sec. 6, 80 Stat. 937, 49 U.S.C. 1655; secs. 313(a), 601 through 605 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421 through 1425); sec. 6(c), Department of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)); and 14 CFR 11.49)
[Doc. No. 1179, 27 FR 7969, Aug. 10, 1962, as amended by Amdt. 63-17, 40 FR 32830, Aug. 5, 1975; Doc. No. 63-21, 47 FR 13316, Mar. 29, 1982]
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES

 

 
| **NAME OF CORPORATION**                |   | **STATE OF  INCORPORATION** |
|----------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                                   |   |                        |
| Kenilworth  Systems Nevada Corporation |   | Nevada                      |
|                                   |   |                        |
| RoulabetteÔ  Corporation          |   | Nevada                      |
|                                   |   |                        |
| Video Wagering Corporation             |   | New York                    |

 

1

----

 
| **NAME OF CORPORATION**          |   | **COUNTRY OF  INCORPORATION** |
|----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                             |   |                          |
| Kenilworth  Systems (UK) Limited |   | United  Kingdom               |

 

2

----