alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 97 (Thursday, May 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12452]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Panel for Genetics; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science announces the following meeting.

    Name: Advisory Panel for Genetics (1149) (Panel C).
    Date and Time: Monday & Tuesday, June 5-6, 2000, 9 A.M.--5 P.M.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Room 320, 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Philip Harriman, Program Director, (703) 
306-1439, Program Director for Microbial Observatories, Room 655, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 
22230.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate research proposals submitted to 
the Microbial Observatories Program as part of the selection process 
for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 12, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-12452 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
§ 18.41 Continuances and changes in place of hearing. ( a ) *By the judge.* Upon reasonable notice to the parties, the judge may change the time, date, and place of the hearing.
( b ) *By a party's motion.* A request by a party to continue a hearing or to change the place of the hearing must be made by motion. ( 1 ) *Continuances.* A motion for continuance must be filed promptly after the party becomes aware of the circumstances supporting the continuance. In exceptional circumstances, a party may orally request a continuance and must immediately notify the other parties of the continuance request.
( 2 ) *Change in place of hearing.* A motion to change the place of a hearing must be filed promptly.
#### § 1471.510 Who maintains the EPLS?

In accordance with the OMB guidelines, the General Services Administration (GSA) maintains the *EPLS.* When a Federal agency takes an action to exclude a person under the nonprocurement or procurement debarment and suspension system, the agency enters the information about the excluded person into the *EPLS.*
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12229]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-270-000]


Nautilus Pipeline Company, L.L.C.; Notice of proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

May 10, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 5, 2000, Nautilus Pipeline Company, L.L.C. 
(Nautilus) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, revised tariff sheets listed in Appendix A to the filing, 
to be effective June 1, 2000.
    Nautilus states that the purpose of this filing is to update 
Nautilus' Original Volume No.1 FERC Gas Tariff to reflect references of 
Interactive Internet Website.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with section 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-12229 Filed 5-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 1921.17 Service; copies of documents and pleadings. ( a ) *Manner of service.* Service upon any party shall be made by the party filing the pleading or document by delivering a copy or mailing a copy to the last known address. If the person upon whom service is made by mail resides 500 miles or more from the party effecting service, such mailing must be by airmail. When a party is represented by an attorney the service may be upon the attorney.
( b ) *Proof of service.* A certificate of the person serving the pleading or other document by personal delivery or by mailing, setting forth the manner of said service shall be proof of the service of the pleading or other document.
( c ) *Service upon Department, number of copies of pleading or other documents.* An original and three copies of all pleadings and other documents shall be filed with the Department of Labor, whether to the Assistant Solicitor in charge of trial litigation, the hearing examiner, or the Assistant Secretary, as the case may be.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-4952

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT WILLIAM COIT, III,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Thomas E. Johnston,

District Judge. (5:04-cr-00129)

Submitted: March 26, 2008 Decided: July 21, 2008

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Troy N. Giatras, THE GIATRAS LAW FIRM, PLLC, Charleston, West

Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. Miller, United States

Attorney, John L. File, Assistant United States Attorney,

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Robert William Coit, III, appeals the district court’s

judgment revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to

fourteen months of imprisonment to be followed by twenty-two months

of supervised release. Coit argues that the district court erred

in revoking his supervised release because it did not give

sufficient weight to family and employment considerations pursuant

to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553 (West 2000 & Supp. 2007). Finding no error,

we affirm.

We review a district court’s order imposing a sentence

after revocation of supervised release for abuse of discretion.

United States v. Davis, 53 F.3d 638, 642-43 (4th Cir. 1995). The

district court abuses its discretion when it fails or refuses to

exercise its discretion or when its exercise of discretion is

flawed by an erroneous legal or factual premise. See James v.

Jacobson, 6 F.3d 233, 239 (4th Cir. 1993). The district court need

only find a violation of a condition of supervised release by a

preponderance of the evidence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (2000).

Other than statements about his family and his employment

potential, none of Coit’s arguments was presented to the district

court during the revocation hearing. We therefore review Coit’s

assertions of error for plain error. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b);

United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 731-32 (1993); United

States v. Carr, 303 F.3d 539, 543 (4th Cir. 2002). Our review of
- 3 -

the record leads us to conclude that the district court did not err

or otherwise abuse its discretion in revoking Coit’s supervised

release.

We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 1915.1030 Bloodborne pathogens.

Note:

The requirements applicable to shipyard employment under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1030 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-1910.1030).

[[61 FR 31431](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31431), June 20, 1996]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Research, Evaluation and  Communication (1210).                    

*Date/Time:*                         June  26, 2000—Rooms 380 & 390 (8am-6pm)                    

June 27, 2000—Rooms 380 & 390 (8am-6pm)

July 13, 2000—Rooms 380 & 390 (8am-6pm)

July 14, 2000—Rooms 380  & 390 (8am-6pm)

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Elizabeth VanderPutten, Program Director, Research Evaluation and Communications Division National Science Foundation, Room 855, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. (703) 306-1650.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate ROLE Proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: May 12, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-12446 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant toSection 906 of the**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I,Gino Scotto, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report ofKenilworth Systems Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such AnnualReport on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of Kenilworth Systems Corporation.

 
| By:    | /s/  Gino Scotto         |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Gino  Scotto             |
| Title: | Chief  Executive Officer |
| Date:  | May  10, 2004            |

 

----
#### § 1650.111 Recovery from other payments due a separated employee.

When a debt owed to EEOC has not been completely liquidated through salary offset and the employee has separated from EEOC, the Commission shall, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3716 and the Federal Claims Collection Standards, 31 CFR parts 900-904, seek to offset the balance of the debt against any financial payment due the employee from the U.S. Government.
## NOT RECOMMENDED F OR F ULL-TEXT PUBLICATION F ile Nam e: 11a0361n.06

Case No. 00- 3409

UNITED STAT ES COURT OF AP P EALS F OR THE S IXTH CIRCUIT

OUR G ARAG E AND WRECK ER SERVICE ; TOWING & RECOVERY

1 

## ASSOCIATI ON OF OHIO,

P laintif fs-App ellees,

v.

CITY OF COLUMBUS; DAVID WILSON; BOBB IE BE AVERS,

Defendan ts-Appellants.

_______________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON AP P EAL FR OM THE UNITED STAT ES DIS TRICT COURT F OR THE S OUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

BEFORE: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; KEITH and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

ALICE M. BATCHEL DER, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellee s Ours Gar ag e and Wrecke r

Service , I nc., and the Towing and Recove ry Association of Ohio broug ht suit ag ainst the City of

Columbus and cer

tain city officia ls to enjoin enfor ceme nt of Chapter 549 of the Columbus City Code
(the “towing ordinanc e”) , which reg ulates consensua l towing opera tions. The district court held that

the I ntere state Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 14501(c) (1), pree mpts the towing ordinanc e, and this

court a ffirme d. Our Garage & W reck er Serv . v. City of Columbus , 257 F.3d 506 (6th Cir. 2001).

The Supreme Court subsequently revers ed t h e decision of this court and rema nded the case for

consideration of whether the towing ordinanc e qualifies as an exercise of “‘sa fety reg ulatory

I n b o t h t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t a n d i n t h i s c o u r t , t h e c a p t i o n o f t h e c a s e h a s i d e n t i f i e d t h e p l a i n t i f

f a s “ O u r 1
G a r a g e ” t h r o u g h o u t t h e c o u r s e o f t h i s l i t i g a t i o n

. T h e c o m p a n y ’ s n a m e i n f a c t i s “ O u r s G a r a g e , ” b u t w e c o n t i n u e t o

u s e “ O u r G a r a g e ” i n t h e c a p t i o n t o a v o i d c o n f u s i o n

.Ca se No. 0 0-3 40 9, Ou r Garage v. Ci ty of Columb us



## authority ’ or otherwise fall[s] within § 14501(c) (2)( A)’s compass.” City of Co l u mb us v. Ours
Garage & W

reck er Serv., Inc. , 536 U.S. 424, 442 (2002). We now rema nd to the District Court for

proce eding s consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

2
# EUR-Lex - 31996R1287 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996R1287

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1287/96 of 3 July 1996 derogating, as regards implementation of the 1996 plan, from the timetable laid down in Article 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 laying down detailed rules for the supply of food from intervention stocks for the benefit of the most deprived persons in the Community **

*
Official Journal L 165 , 04/07/1996 P. 0025 - 0025 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1287/96 of 3 July 1996 derogating, as regards implementation of the 1996 plan, from the timetable laid down in Article 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 laying down detailed rules for the supply of food from intervention stocks for the benefit of the most deprived persons in the Community

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3730/87 of 10 December 1987 laying down the general rules for the supply of food from intervention stocks to designated organizations for distribution to the most deprived persons in the Community (1), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2535/92 (2), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas Article 3 (1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 267/96 (4), provides that implementation of the plan is to run from 1 October to 30 September of the following year and that withdrawal of the products from the intervention stocks is to take place up to 31 August following the commencement of implementation of the plan;

Whereas the plan allocating to the Member States resources to be charged to the 1996 budget for implementation of the supply of food to the most deprived persons in the Community was amended, in the course of its implementation, in April 1996 (5); whereas, as a result, the timetable provided for in Article 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 should be derogated from to enable the Member States to adjust their programme for distribution to the beneficiaries;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of all the relevant Management Committees,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the implementation of the 1996 plan, notwithstanding Article 3 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92:

- withdrawal of the products from the intervention stocks may take place up to 30 November 1996, and

- the products may be distributed up to 31 January 1997.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 July 1996.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 352, 15. 12. 1987, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 260, 31. 10. 1995, p. 3.

(3) OJ No L 313, 30. 10. 1992, p. 50.

(4) OJ No L 36, 14. 2. 1996, p. 2.

(5) OJ No L 89, 10. 4. 1996, p. 42.
## Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Royce William Tawater

No. 06

- 15

- 00142

- CR Original Mandamus Proceeding

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss,

Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the

relief sought. Therefore, we deny the petition

.

RENDERED AUGUST 25, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
§ 1695.6 Notice and public comment. ( a ) Each proposed significant guidance document shall have a period of notice and public comment of at least 30 days, unless the Commission, in consultation with OIRA, finds good cause that such notice and public comment are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, and incorporates such finding and a brief statement of reasons therefor into the guidance document.
( b ) Notice shall be published in the Federal Register announcing that a draft of the proposed guidance document is publicly available on the Federal e-regulation website, and the proposed significant guidance document also shall be posted on the Commission website.
( c ) The Commission shall prepare and post a public response to major concerns raised in the comments, as appropriate, either before or when the significant guidance document is finalized and issued.
( d ) When appropriate, the Chair may determine that a guidance document that is not otherwise required to go through notice and public comment shall also be subject to a period of public comment following the document's approval by the Commission before the document becomes effective.
( e ) Unless otherwise determined in writing by the Chair, upon issuing a significant guidance document, a report shall be submitted to Congress and GAO in accordance with the procedures described in 5 U.S.C. 801 (the “Congressional Review Act”).
§ 25.1201 Fire extinguishing system materials. ( a ) No material in any fire extinguishing system may react chemically with any extinguishing agent so as to create a hazard.
( b ) Each system component in an engine compartment must be fireproof.
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.105 Safety nets. ( a ) Safety nets shall be provided when workplaces are more than 25 feet above the ground or water surface, or other surfaces where the use of ladders, scaffolds, catch platforms, temporary floors, safety lines, or safety belts is impractical.
( b ) Where safety net protection is required by this part, operations shall not be undertaken until the net is in place and has been tested.
( c ) ( 1 ) Nets shall extend 8 feet beyond the edge of the work surface where employees are exposed and shall be installed as close under the work surface as practical but in no case more than 25 feet below such work surface. Nets shall be hung with sufficient clearance to prevent user's contact with the surfaces or structures below. Such clearances shall be determined by impact load testing.
( 2 ) It is intended that only one level of nets be required for bridge construction.
( d ) The mesh size of nets shall not exceed 6 inches by 6 inches. All new nets shall meet accepted performance standards of 17,500 foot-pounds minimum impact resistance as determined and certified by the manufacturers, and shall bear a label of proof test. Edge ropes shall provide a minimum breaking strength of 5,000 pounds.
( e ) Forged steel safety hooks or shackles shall be used to fasten the net to its supports.
( f ) Connections between net panels shall develop the full strength of the net.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 87 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 87

    To permit the cancellation of certain loans under the Robert T. 
         Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To permit the cancellation of certain loans under the Robert T. 
         Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CANCELLATION OF LOANS.

    Section 2(a) of the Community Disaster Loan Act of 2005 (Public Law 
109-88) is amended by striking ``Provided further, That notwithstanding 
section 417(c)(1) of the Stafford Act, such loans may not be 
canceled:''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by this Act shall take effect as though enacted 
as part of the Community Disaster Loan Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-88).
                                 <all>
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Annualreport of the Office of Economic Research.
 
2011 | 2012| 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018
 
SuDoc Number:SBA 1.1/9:
Item Number:0901-A-11 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000932200
 
March 13, 2018**