alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-273-000]

Take notice that on May 3, 2000, Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company (Eastern Shore) tendered for filing its Interruptible Revenue Sharing Report pursuant to Section 37 of the General Terms and Conditions of its FERC Tariff.

Eastern Shore states that it intends to credit a total of $312,784, including interest of $13,248, to its firm transportation customers on July 1, 2000. Eastern Shore states that the credit amount represents 90 percent of the net revenues received by Eastern Shore under Rate Schedule IT (in excess of the cost of service allocated to such rate schedule), for the period April 1999 through March 2000.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before May 18, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-12266  Filed 5-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 2200.72 Objections. ( a ) *Statement of objection.* Any objection with respect to the conduct of the hearing, including any objection to the introduction of evidence or a ruling by the Judge, may be stated orally or in writing, accompanied by a short statement of the grounds for the objection, and shall be included in the record. No such objection shall be deemed waived by further participation in the hearing.
( b ) *Offer of proof.* Whenever evidence is excluded from the record, the party offering such evidence may make an offer of proof, which shall be included in the record of the proceeding.
( c ) Once the Judge rules definitively on the record—either before or at the hearing—a party need not renew an objection or offer of proof to preserve a claim of error for appeal.
§ 27.683 Operation tests. It must be shown by operation tests that, when the controls are operated from the pilot compartment with the control system loaded to correspond with loads specified for the system, the system is free from— ( a ) Jamming;
( b ) Excessive friction; and
( c ) Excessive deflection.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-11066

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARQUIST THEOBLES WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:15-CR-250-1

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and OWEN and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Marquist Theobles Williams appeals the district court’s decision to 

revoke his term of supervised release. He argues that the district court erred 

by failing to consider substance abuse treatment, in lieu of incarceration, 

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d) and U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4, p.s., comment. (n.6). He 

also argues that his 24-month term of imprisonment, which was above the 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 25, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-11066 Document: 00515049990 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/25/2019
No. 18-11066

2

guidelines range of 6 to 12 months of imprisonment, was substantively 

unreasonable.

As Williams did not raise his argument under § 3583(d) and § 7B1.4, p.s., 

comment. (n.6) in the district court, our review is for plain error. See Puckett 

v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). In addition to failing drug testing, 

which would implicate the § 3583(d) exception, Williams violated the 

conditions of his supervised release by using and possessing cocaine, 

marijuana, synthetic marijuana, phencyclidine (PCP), and alcohol, failing to 

appear for drug testing, and failing to attend counseling services. Williams

has failed to show any plain error. See, e.g., United States v. Smith, 672 F. 

App’x 461, 462 (5th Cir. 2017) (affirming revocation on similar grounds);

United States v. Harper, No. 01-10623, 2002 WL 494731, at *1-2 (5th Cir. Mar.

15, 2002) (unpublished) (same); see also United States v. Guerrero-Robledo, 565 

F.3d 940, 946 (5th Cir. 2009) (“It certainly is not plain error for the district 

court to rely on an unpublished opinion that is squarely on point.”).

We review the substantive reasonableness of a challenged sentence for 

abuse of discretion. United States v. Miller, 634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir. 2011). 

A revocation sentence is substantively unreasonable if the district court did 

not account for a factor that should have received significant weight, gave 

significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor, or made a clear error of 

judgment in balancing the sentencing factors. United States v. Warren, 720 

F.3d 321, 332 (5th Cir. 2013). Williams’s argument that his sentence is 

substantively unreasonable for the sole reason that the district court failed to 

take into account § 3583(d) fails to demonstrate an abuse of the district court’s 

wide sentencing discretion. See Miller, 634 F.3d at 843.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 18-11066 Document: 00515049990 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/25/2019
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4960 

To extend of period for adjustment of status for certain Liberian nationals. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 3, 2020 

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To extend of period for adjustment of status for certain 

Liberian nationals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PERIOD FOR ADJUSTMENT OF 

4 STATUS FOR CERTAIN LIBERIAN NATIONALS. 

5 Section 7611(b)(1)(A) of the National Defense Au6 thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116– 

7 92; 133 Stat. 2309; 8 U.S.C. 1255 note) is amended by 

8 striking ‘‘1 year’’ and inserting ‘‘June 30, 2021’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in (a) the Registration  Statement
(Form S-8 No.  333-3212)  pertaining to the Columbus  McKinnon  Corporation 1995
Incentive  Stock Option Plan, the Columbus  McKinnon  Corporation  Non-Qualified
Stock Option Plan, the Columbus McKinnon  Corporation  Restricted Stock Plan and
the Columbus  McKinnon  Corporation  Employee Stock  Ownership Plan  Restatement
Effective  April  1,  1989  of  Columbus   McKinnon   Corporation  and  (b)  the
Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8 No.  333-81719)  pertaining  to the  Options
assumed by  Columbus  McKinnon  Corporation  originally  granted  under the G.L.
International Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan and the Larco Industrial Services Ltd.
1997 Stock  Option Plan of our report  dated May 17,  1999,  with respect to the
consolidated  financial  statements and financial statement schedule of Columbus
McKinnon  Corporation  included in this Annual  Report  (Form 10-K) for the year
ended March 31, 1999.


                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Buffalo, New York
June 29, 1999
AFS-14-284-E 

January 5, 2015 

 Exemption No. 11139 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0310 

Mr. Thomas J. Quehl 

Vice President, Operations 

Western Global Airlines, Inc. 

5566 Broadcast Court 

Sarasota, FL 34620 

Dear Mr. Quehl: 

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our 

decision and explains its basis. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letters dated May 8, August 5, and August 19, 2014, you petitioned the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) on behalf of Western Global Airlines, LLC (Western Global) for an 

exemption from § 121.434(c)(1)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the 

extent necessary to allow Western Global to substitute a qualified and authorized check 

airman or aircrew program designee (APD) for an FAA inspector to observe a qualifying pilot 

in command (PIC) who is completing initial or upgrade training specified in § 121.424 during 

at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a landing. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because this is not a precedent-setting petition, and any delay in acting 

on this petition would be detrimental to Western Global. 

The FAA issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 10430 (copy enclosed), the 

FAA found that a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest and would not 

provide a level of safety equivalent to the rule because of the petitioner’s limited experience 

as a part 121 carrier and because of the agency’s need to monitor and validate the training 

program. Further, the petitioner had not received final approval for its training program. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed Denial 

of Exemption No. 10430; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed Denial of Exemption No. 10430 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§106(f), 40113, and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, the petition of Western Global Airlines, Inc. is denied an 

exemption from 14 CFR 121.434(c)(1)(ii). 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John S. Duncan 

Director, Flight Standards Service 

Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          15,120
<SECURITIES>                                    24,387
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,048
<ALLOWANCES>                                       593
<INVENTORY>                                        104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,842
<PP&E>                                           8,993
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,714
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,065
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           207
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,870
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,142
<SALES>                                         75,050
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,050
<CGS>                                           61,012
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,012
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,177
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   662
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,653)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (27,653)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,653)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.36)


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 1904
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 20548, May 3, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-21, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration removed all amendments to part 1904 published at 81 FR 91792, Dec. 19, 2016.

§ 1904.42 Requests from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for data. ( a ) *Basic requirement.* If you receive a Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses Form from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), or a BLS designee, you must promptly complete the form and return it following the instructions contained on the survey form.
( b ) *Implementation* — ( 1 ) *Does every employer have to send data to the BLS?* No, each year, the BLS sends injury and illness survey forms to randomly selected employers and uses the information to create the Nation's occupational injury and illness statistics. In any year, some employers will receive a BLS survey form and others will not. You do not have to send injury and illness data to the BLS unless you receive a survey form.
( 2 ) *If I get a survey form from the BLS, what do I have to do?* If you receive a Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses Form from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), or a BLS designee, you must promptly complete the form and return it, following the instructions contained on the survey form.
( 3 ) *Do I have to respond to a BLS survey form if I am normally exempt from keeping OSHA injury and illness records?* Yes, even if you are exempt from keeping injury and illness records under § 1904.1 to § 1904.3, the BLS may inform you in writing that it will be collecting injury and illness information from you in the coming year. If you receive such a letter, you must keep the injury and illness records required by § 1904.5 to § 1904.15 and make a survey report for the year covered by the survey.
( 4 ) *Do I have to answer the BLS survey form if I am located in a State-Plan State?* Yes, all employers who receive a survey form must respond to the survey, even those in State-Plan States.
From:•King.Melanie@epamail.epa.gov

Sent:•Monday, August 09, 2010 9:50 PM

To:•Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

Cc:•Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov; Talcott.Fred@epamail.epa.gov;

horowitz.michael@epamail.epa.gov

Subject:•engine cost info

Attachments:•EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0059-0195.pdf; EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0059-0668 - 

National

Impacts.pdf

Cortney, one of the items requested on the call today was information on

engine costs. See the far right column in Table 5 of the attached national

impacts memo. The information is a little old but gives you a ballpark idea.

Also attached is another reference we have.

(See attached file: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0059-0195.pdf)(See attached file:

EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0059-0668 - National Impacts.pdf)

Melanie King

Energy Strategies Group

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency

Mail Code D243-01

RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-2469

Fax: (919) 541-5450

king.melanie@epa.gov
§ 1910.421 Pre-dive procedures. ( a ) *General.* The employer shall comply with the following requirements prior to each diving operation, unless otherwise specified.
( b ) *Emergency aid.* A list shall be kept at the dive location of the telephone or call numbers of the following: ( 1 ) An operational decompression chamber (if not at the dive location);
( 2 ) Accessible hospitals;
( 3 ) Available physicians;
( 4 ) Available means of transportation; and
( 5 ) The nearest U.S. Coast Guard Rescue Coordination Center.
( c ) *First aid supplies.* ( 1 ) A first aid kit appropriate for the diving operation and approved by a physician shall be available at the dive location.
( 2 ) When used in a decompression chamber or bell, the first aid kit shall be suitable for use under hyperbaric conditions.
( 3 ) In addition to any other first aid supplies, an American Red Cross standard first aid handbook or equivalent, and a bag-type manual resuscitator with transparent mask and tubing shall be available at the dive location.
( d ) *Planning and assessment.* Planning of a diving operation shall include an assessment of the safety and health aspects of the following: ( 1 ) Diving mode;
( 2 ) Surface and underwater conditions and hazards;
( 3 ) Breathing gas supply (including reserves);
( 4 ) Thermal protection;
( 5 ) Diving equipment and systems;
( 6 ) Dive team assignments and physical fitness of dive team members (including any impairment known to the employer);
( 7 ) Repetitive dive designation or residual inert gas status of dive team members;
( 8 ) Decompression and treatment procedures (including altitude corrections); and
( 9 ) Emergency procedures.
( e ) *Hazardous activities.* To minimize hazards to the dive team, diving operations shall be coordinated with other activities in the vicinity which are likely to interfere with the diving operation.
( f ) *Employee briefing.* ( 1 ) Dive team members shall be briefed on: ( i ) The tasks to be undertaken;
( ii ) Safety procedures for the diving mode;
( iii ) Any unusual hazards or environmental conditions likely to affect the safety of the diving operation; and
( iv ) Any modifications to operating procedures necessitated by the specific diving operation.
( 2 ) Prior to making individual dive team member assignments, the employer shall inquire into the dive team member's current state of physical fitness, and indicate to the dive team member the procedure for reporting physical problems or adverse physiological effects during and after the dive.
( g ) *Equipment inspection.* The breathing gas supply system including reserve breathing gas supplies, masks, helmets, thermal protection, and bell handling mechanism (when appropriate) shall be inspected prior to each dive.
( h ) *Warning signal.* When diving from surfaces other than vessels in areas capable of supporting marine traffic, a rigid replica of the international code flag “A” at least one meter in height shall be displayed at the dive location in a manner which allows all-round visibility, and shall be illuminated during night diving operations.
[42 FR 37668, July 22, 1977, as amended at 47 FR 14706, Apr. 6, 1982; 54 FR 24334, June 7, 1989]
Exhibit 12.2



CERTIFICATIONS

I, Bruno Mouclier, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Rhodia S.A.;

2.

based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

the Companys other Certifying Officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared,

(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation, and

(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

the Companys other Certifying Officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information, and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.







|Date: May 5, 2005 | /s/ Bruno Mouclier                               
|----------------- | -------------------------------------------------
|                  | Bruno Mouclier                                   
|                  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer