alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1952.8 Minnesota. ( a ) The Minnesota State plan received initial approval on June 8, 1973.
( b ) The Minnesota State plan received final approval on July 30, 1985.
( c ) Under the terms of the 1978 Court Order in *AFL-CIO* v. *Marshall,* compliance staffing levels (benchmarks) necessary for a “fully effective” enforcement program were required to be established for each State operating an approved State plan. In September 1984 Minnesota, in conjunction with OSHA, completed a reassessment of the levels initially established in 1980 and proposed revised compliance staffing benchmarks of 31 safety and 12 health compliance officers. After opportunity for public comment and service on the AFL-CIO, the Assistant Secretary approved these revised staffing requirements on July 30, 1985.
( d ) The plan covers all private-sector employers and employees, with several notable exceptions, as well as State and local government employers and employees, within the State. For current information on these exceptions and for additional details about the plan, please visit *http://www.osha.gov/dcsp/osp/stateprogs/minnesota.html .*
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-10442

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

David Aguilar Reyes, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:18-CR-260-1

Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent David Aguilar 

Reyes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Reyes has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 7, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10442 Document: 00516570608 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/07/2022
No. 22-10442

2

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 22-10442 Document: 00516570608 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/07/2022
#### In the Matter of Harriet Jacobs, Appellant, v Wappingers Central School District, Respondent.

[697 NYS2d 350]

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, Wappingers Central School District, to file an affidavit stating that the petitioner is eligible for retroactive membership in the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System, the petitioner ap*216peals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bellantoni, J.), dated August 18, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is granted, the determination is annulled, and the matter is remitted to the respondent to file an affidavit pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law § 803 (b) (3) stating that the petitioner is eligible for retroactive membership in the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System.

Initially, we determine that the verification of the petition in this case was proper. Further, contrary to the Supreme Court’s conclusion, the petitioner satisfied her initial burden of demonstrating that she met the requirements of Retirement and Social Security Law § 803 (b) (3) *(see, Matter of Scanlan v Buffalo Pub. School Sys.,*90 NY2d 662; *Matter of Spector v Board of Educ.,*251 AD2d 588). The respondent’s vague and conclusory assertion that it was not the petitioner’s first public employer was insufficient to demonstrate a rational basis for its failure to process the petitioner’s application for retroactive membership in the retirement system. Since the dates of the petitioner’s employment' with the respondent are not disputed, the determination of her date of membership will be made by the public retirement system *(see,*Retirement and Social Security Law § 803 [b], [c]). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
#### § 2200.36 [Reserved]
# EUR-Lex - 32000R1622R(02) - DE

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R1622R(02)

**Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1622/2000 der Kommission vom 24. Juli 2000 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1493/1999 über die gemeinsame Marktorganisation für Wein und zur Einführung eines Gemeinschaftskodex der önologischen Verfahren und Behandlungen (ABl. L 194 vom 31.7.2000) **

*
Amtsblatt Nr. L 100 vom 06/04/2004 S. 0048 - 0048 *

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1622/2000 der Kommission vom 24. Juli 2000 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1493/1999 über die gemeinsame Marktorganisation für Wein und zur Einführung eines Gemeinschaftskodex der önologischen Verfahren und Behandlungen

(Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 194 vom 31. Juli 2000)

Seite 12, Artikel 41 Absatz 1 zweiter Gedankenstrich:

anstatt:

- diese Verfahren oder Behandlungen nicht ein Volumen von mehr als 500000 hl je Jahr oder Versuch betreffen;

muss es heißen:

- diese Verfahren oder Behandlungen nicht ein Volumen von mehr als 50000 hl je Jahr oder Versuch betreffen;.
#### § 2700.62 Name of miner witness.

A Judge shall not, until 2 days before a hearing, disclose or order a person to disclose to an operator or his agent the name of a miner who is expected by the Judge to testify or whom a party expects to summon or call as a witness.
Compensatory Arrangements with Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.12 
 Compensatory Arrangements with Executive Officers 
 Base salary
information for our executive officers for 2010 is set forth in the table below. 
  

						
	 Name
	  	 Title
	  	Base Salary
	 C. Richard Harrison
	  	Chief Executive Officer	  	$	600,000
	 James E. Heppelmann
	  	President and Chief Operating Officer	  	$	550,000
	 Barry F. Cohen
	  	Executive Vice President, Strategic Services and Partners	  	$	415,000
	 Paul J. Cunningham
	  	Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales	  	$	415,000
	 Anthony DiBona
	  	Executive Vice President, Global Maintenance Support	  	$	363,000
	 Robert C. Gremley
	  	Executive Vice President, Corporate Marketing	  	$	275,000
	 Cornelius F. Moses
	  	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	  	$	415,000
	 Brian A. Shepherd
	  	Executive Vice President, Product Development	  	$	275,000
	 Aaron C. von Staats
	  	Corporate Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary	  	$	350,000

 Compensatory arrangements relating to other aspects of our executive compensation program are
included as exhibits to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. In addition, further information about compensation of our executive officers is found in our proxy statements on file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, as well as in our periodic Current Report on Form 8-K filings.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 99 (Monday, May 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 32086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12725]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-284-000]


Southern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes to FERC 
Gas Tariff

May 16, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 12, 2000, Southern Natural Gas Company 
(Southern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Seventh 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to become effective 
July 1, 2000:

Third Revised Sheet No. 114
Third Revised Sheet No. 115

    Southern states that the purpose of this filing is to revise 
Section 6.2 of the General Terms and Conditions to its tariff by 
expanding the rights of delivery point operators to consolidate 
multiple measurement stations into one delivery point.
    Southern states that copies of the filing will be served upon its 
shippers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-12725 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2193

JESSIE ROYSTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NHP MANAGEMENT COMPANY; APARTMENT INVESTMENT &

MANAGEMENT COMPANY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00-

290-L)

Submitted: April 30, 2002 Decided: May 16, 2002

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edith A. Lawson-Jackson, E. A. LAWSON-JACKSON & ASSOCIATES, Bowie,

Maryland, for Appellant. Jonathan W. Greenbaum, Adrian V. Nelson,

II, Gina Janeiro Lisher, MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY &

POPEO, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jessie Royster appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to Defendants in this action brought pursuant to

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and 42

U.S.C.A. § 1981 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Royster v. NHP Management Co., No. CA-00-290-L (D. Md. Sept.

13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.5.1

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

AMENDMENT NO. 1

THIS AMENDMENT NO.1 (this "Amendment") dated February 13, 2002 is made to the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") dated as of August 14, 2000 by and
between
Advanstar, Inc. (the "Company") and James M. Alic ("Executive").

WHEREAS, the parties to the Agreement seek to modify certain terms of the Agreement to the extent described in this Amendment;

THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, intending to be legally bound, the
Company and Executive hereby agree as follows:









1

---

This
Amendment is effective, on a prospective basis only, as of March 1, 2002.

Except
to the extent amended by this Amendment, the Agreement is affirmed and remains in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly signed this Amendment as of the day and year first written above.

| |  | ADVANSTAR, INC.
| |  | ---------------
| |  | By:            
| |  |                
| |  |                
| |  |                

2

---

QuickLinks
§ 2584.8477(e)-5 Effect of allocation. Where fiduciary responsibility has been allocated to another person or persons pursuant to the procedures contained in this part, the allocating fiduciary shall not be liable for any act or omission of such person or persons unless: ( a ) The allocating fiduciary has violated 5 U.S.C. 8477(b) with respect to— ( 1 ) The allocation or the continuation of the allocation,
( 2 ) The implementation of these procedures, or
( 3 ) The duty to monitor the performance of such person or persons in a reasonable manner during the life of the allocation, or
( b ) The allocating fiduciary would otherwise be liable in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 8477(e)(1)(D).
# Europeiska unionens C 194A/30 j

| | ISSN 1725-2504 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 194A |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 47 årgången30 juli 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2504

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 194A

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

47 årgången30 juli 2004

---

| Informationsnummer | Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Upplysningar |
| | Rådet |
| 2004/C 194A/1 | Utlysning av lediga tjänster — Europeiska försvarsbyrån — Direktörer | 1 |
| | Europeiskt centrum för övervakning av rasism och främlingsfientlighet |
| 2004/C 194A/2 | Ansökningsinfordran HOUA-A-2004 | 2 |

Informationsnummer

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

III   Upplysningar

Rådet

2004/C 194A/1

Utlysning av lediga tjänster — Europeiska försvarsbyrån — Direktörer

1

Europeiskt centrum för övervakning av rasism och främlingsfientlighet

2004/C 194A/2

Ansökningsinfordran HOUA-A-2004

2

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

III Upplysningar

Rådet

| 30.7.2004 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | CA 194/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2004

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

CA 194/1

---

UTLYSNING AV LEDIGA TJÄNSTER

Europeiska försvarsbyrån

Direktörer

(2004/C 194 A/01)

Europeiska försvarsbyrån har för avsikt att rekrytera fyra direktörer tillsina fyra avdelningar:

| — | Utveckling av försvarskapacitet (se EDA/A/2004/012), |
| --- | --- |

—

Utveckling av försvarskapacitet (se EDA/A/2004/012),

| — | Forskning och teknisk utveckling (se EDA/A/2004/0029), |
| --- | --- |

—

Forskning och teknisk utveckling (se EDA/A/2004/0029),

| — | Försvarsmateriel (se EDA/A/2004/042), |
| --- | --- |

—

Försvarsmateriel (se EDA/A/2004/042),

| — | Försvarsindustri och marknad (se EDA/A/2004/051). |
| --- | --- |

—

Försvarsindustri och marknad (se EDA/A/2004/051).

Närmare upplysningar (finns tillgängliga på engelska) samt ansökningshandlingar kan erhållas på rådets webbplats http://ue.eu.int (kontakter/lediga platser).

Sista ansökningsdag är den 3 september 2004, poststämpelns datum gäller.

---

Europeiskt centrum för övervakning av rasism och främlingsfientlighet

| 30.7.2004 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | CA 194/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2004

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

CA 194/2

---

ANSÖKNINGSINFORDRAN HOUA-A-2004

(2004/C 194 A/02)

Europeiskt centrum för övervakning av rasism och främlingsfientlighet (EUMC) önskar sökande till vissa tjänster. Utförliga uppgifter om de lediga tjänsterna, centrumets uppdrag och om hur ansökningshandlingarna skall ställas samman finns på EUMC:s webbplats http://eumc.eu.int.

---
#### WILLIAMS v JOHNS et

Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist Summit Co

No 1683.

Decided Feb. 18, 1930

Commins, Brouse, Englebeck & McDowell, Akron, R. S. Dechant, Lebanon, for defendants Keifer and Haynes.

Grover C. Walker, Akron, for defendant Keller.
#### § 1917.28 Hazard communication (See also § 1917.1(a)(2)(vi)).
#### § 2200.32 Signing of pleadings and motions.

Pleadings and motions shall be signed by the filing party or by the party's representative. The signature of a representative constitutes a representation by the representative that the representative is authorized to represent the party or parties on whose behalf the pleading is filed. The signature of a representative or party also constitutes a certificate by the representative or party that the representative or party has read the pleading, motion, or other document, that to the best of the representative's or party's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after reasonable inquiry, it is well grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, and that it is not included for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation. If a pleading, motion, or other document is signed in violation of this rule, such signing party or its representative shall be subject to the sanctions set forth in § 2200.101 or § 2200.104. A signature by a party representative constitutes a representation by the representative that the representative understands that the rules and orders of the Commission and its Judges apply equally to attorney and non-attorney representatives.

[84 FR 14558, Apr. 10, 2019, as amended at 87 FR 8949, Feb. 17, 2022]
Exhibit 10.3

December 29, 2000


TravelNow.com Inc.
318 Park Central East, Suite 306
Springfield, Missouri 65806.
Attn.:   Jeffrey Wasson
         Chief Executive Officer

                  Re:  Exclusivity Agreement

Dear Jeff:

     Over the last few weeks we have discussed the possibility of Hotel
Reservations Network, Inc. ("HRN") acquiring TravelNow.com, Inc. ("TravelNow").
I think it is clear that the discussions have reached the point that we should
now devote ourselves to working on a definitive agreement to find out whether or
not a transaction can be structured on price and terms that are acceptable to
both parties. To that end, we are prepared to pursue that determination on an
expedited schedule, provided that TravelNow is of a like mind. Before committing
the substantial resources necessary to pursue this transaction on the schedule
proposed, HRN would like to be sure that your interest in a transaction with HRN
is at a serious and high level and that TravelNow is willing, for a very brief
period of time, to devote itself exclusively to attempting to reach an agreement
with HRN. Accordingly, we ask that TravelNow covenant and agree that during the
period extending from 8:15 p.m. Central Standard Time on December 29, 2000 (the
"Commencement Time") through 11:59 p.m. Central Standard Time on January 2, 2001
(the "Termination Time"), TravelNow will not, either directly or indirectly,
through any of its employees, officers, directors, investment bankers or other
agents, solicit, encourage, negotiate, discuss or enter into, any discussions,
negotiations, agreements or understandings with any party other than HRN to sell
all or any substantial portion of TravelNow's assets or stock (by merger or
otherwise) to any person or entity or provide any party with information about
TravelNow for the purpose of considering any such transaction. TravelNow further
agrees that if, during the period extending from the Commencement Time to the
Termination Time, it receives any unsolicited proposals or indications of
interest from any other party, it will promptly so advise HRN of such proposal;
provided, however, that if TravelNow is prohibited pursuant to the terms of any
pre-existing agreement to which it is a party from disclosing such information,
then TravelNow shall only be required to disclose to HRN that an offer has been
received and whether such offer is superior to the existing offer of HRN.

     Assuming that this is agreeable to TravelNow, please so indicate by signing
below and returning this letter to me.

                                             Very truly yours,

                                             HOTEL RESERVATIONS NETWORK, INC.



                                             By:


ACCEPTED and AGREED to by Travel Now, Inc.
this 29th day of December, 2000

TRAVELNOW.COM INC.


By: /s/ Jeff Wasson
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [Report No. 2409]

Petition for Clarification has been filed in the Commission's rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of this document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to this petition must be filed by June 1, 2000. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired.

*Subject:*                     Service Rules for the 746-764 and 776-794 MHz Bands, and Revisions to Part 27 of the Commission's Rules (WT Docket No. 99-168)                

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     1.                

Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-12363  Filed 5-16-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
Fw: CO NAAQS briefing for our 1 PM meeting

Deirdre Murphy to: Sherry Russell 08/12/2011 03:31 PM

This is email to OMB w. briefing slides.

----- Forwarded by Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/12/2011 03:31 PM -----

From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Christine J. Kymn" <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: "Deirdre Murphy" <murphy.deirdre@epa.gov>, "Karen Martin" <martin.karen@epa.gov>, "Nealson 

Watkins" <Watkins.Nealson@epamail.epa.gov>, king.jan@epa.gov

Date: 07/28/2011 10:02 AM

Subject: CO NAAQS briefing for our 1 PM meeting

Christine, 

Attached are the slides for our 1 PM meeting today on the CO NAAQS. Thanks.

Lydia

Deirdre Murphy

 ----- Original Message -----

 From: Deirdre Murphy

 Sent: 07/28/2011 09:56 AM EDT

 To: Lydia Wegman

 Subject: CO - slides for omb