alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.0





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Woronoco Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Cornelius D. Mahoney, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.





By:

/s/    CORNELIUS D.
MAHONEYCornelius D. Mahoney Chief
Executive Officer  August 14, 2002







---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Woronoco Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Debra L. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.





By:

/s/    DEBRA L. MURPHYDebra L. Murphy Chief
Financial Officer  August 14, 2002
----

----

I Teave

Komisjon

----

Euro vahetuskurss (1)

30. juuni 2004

(2004/C 171/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Allikas: EKP avaldatud viitekurss.

----
#### § 1917.21 Open fires.

Open fires and fires in drums or similar containers are prohibited.
Exhibit 31.2

                        CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302

I, John R. Beals, certify that:

    1. I have reviewed this annual report of The First Years;

    2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

    3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

    4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

    5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: March 15, 2004


/s/ JOHN R. BEALS
-----------------
John R. Beals
Senior Vice President - Finance and Treasurer,
(Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.1

                       CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                       OF
                                IRT PARTNERS L.P.


         The general partners of IRT Partners L.P., desiring to form a limited
partnership pursuant to the Georgia Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act,
O.C.G.A. Title 14, Chapter 9, hereby certify as follows:

         1.       The name of the limited partnership is IRT Partners L.P.

         2.       The address of the registered office of the limited
partnership is 200 Galleria Parkway, Suite 1400, Atlanta, Georgia 30339 and the
name and address of the initial agent for service of process is CT Corporation
System at 1201 Peachtree Street, NE, Atlanta, Georgia 3036.

         3.       The name and business address of the general partner of the
limited partnership is as follows:

                IRT Property Company
                200 Galleria Parkway
                Suite 1400
                Atlanta, Georgia 30339

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the general partner has executed and sealed this
certificate this 14th day of July, 1998.



                                       By: /s/ James G. Levy
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          James G. Levy
                                          Vice President and Treasurer


                                       11
<PAGE>   2

                                    SCHEDULE
                                   ATTACHED TO
                       CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                          TRANSMITTAL INFORMATION FORM
                                       FOR
                                IRT PARTNERS L.P.

5.       Names and Business Addresses of each General Partner:

                                    IRT Property Company
                                    200 Galleria Parkway
                                    Suite 1400
                                    Atlanta, Georgia 30339


                                       12
1 

### AMS - Beefcarcassrevisions

From: McEvers, Trenton J. <tmcevers@mail.wtamu.edu> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 4:59 PM To: AMS - Beefcarcassrevisions Subject: Beef Grading Revisions Attachments: Commentary Regarding the Revision of Beef Grading Standards.docx

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

To whom it may concern,

Please find the attached document containing comments related to the current beef carcass grading system.

Thank you,



### Trent McEvers, Ph.D.
WTAMU Box 60998 Canyon, TX 79016

‐ 0001 Email: tmcevers@wtamu.edu Cell: 806

‐ 676

‐ 9943Commentary Regarding the Revision of Beef Grading Standards:

1.) Estimation of beef carcass m aturity and quality grade

.
The current system utilized to determine beef carcass maturity is flawed due to the physiology of cartilage ossification. Moreover, the subjective determination of skeletal and lean maturity has been widely debated in the industry setting. The key compo nent regarding ossification is e str ogen and estrogen ligands which have a pronounced effect on ossification of the cartila ginous tips of the lumbar, thoracic, and sac ral vertebrae. This becomes problematic especially in cycling heifers and those exposed to a bull that may experience increased estrogen spiking ante mortem. Ultimately,
the free market has accepted the utiliza tion of dentition to estimate age and BSE risk rather than
skeletal and lean maturity . Due to the current marketing atmosphere, I believe removal of the
skeletal lean a nd bone maturity system for determination of quality grade is warra nted.

2.) Estimation of beef carcass yield grade and saleable meat yield.

Under the current system, beef carcasses must achieve specific ribeye

- area measurements at carcass weights to achieve a desirable yield grade. These calculated yield grades may result in a premium on many value

- based formulas. One prominent fact of the b eef industry is that cattle frame score and overall weights have steadily increased since the development of the current yield grading system. In addition, with ever

- changing cattle populations such as da iry bred steers and heifers being utilized, a new equation that effectively accounts for variation in the current population and t he foreseeable future is need ed. If a new system is developed to classify carcasses, it may be advantageous to develop equat ions that estimate saleable meat yield percentage rather than the current ordinal value ranges. The free market could then actively develop ranges of red meat yield percentage that could receive discounts and premiums and ultimately reflect shifts in box beef yield.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPR-12-0000585 10-JUL-2012 NO. SCPR-12-0000585 02:58 PM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I

IN RE LLOYD I. MASHITA, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN AND SURRENDER LICENSE (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and McKenna, JJ.,

and Intermediate Court of Appeals Associate Judge Ginoza, assigned by reason of vacancy) Upon consideration of Petitioner Lloyd I. Mashita’s petition to resign and surrender his license to practice law in the State of Hawai' i, filed pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai' i (RSCH), and of the affidavits and exhibits in support thereof, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g), that Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and record requirements of RSCH Rule 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g). IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the name of Petitioner Lloyd I. Mashita, attorney number 1622, from the roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai ' i, effective with the filing of this order.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, July 10, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 14-0534

Filed August 19, 2015

STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

ALLEN MICHAEL VERBEEK,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Tama County, Marsha M. 

Beckelman, Judge. 

A defendant appeals his sentence following his Alford plea to domestic 

abuse assault. AFFIRMED.

Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Vidhya K. Reddy, Assistant 

Appellate Defender, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin Cmelik and Sheryl A. Soich, 

Assistant Attorneys General, and Brent D. Heeren, County Attorney, for appellee.

Considered by Doyle, P.J., and Mullins and Bower, JJ.
2

MULLINS, J.

Allen Verbeek entered a written Alford1guilty plea to domestic abuse 

assault, an aggravated misdemeanor, in violation of Iowa Code section 

708.2A(1) and (3)(b) (2013). In exchange, the State dismissed multiple counts 

and separate pending cases. The written plea provided the court could rely on 

the minutes of evidence attached to the trial information to establish a factual 

basis for the plea. The plea expressly admitted his prior conviction of domestic 

abuse on July 9, 2009, which the trial information stated was a third-offense 

domestic abuse assault. His written guilty plea requested immediate sentencing, 

waived personal presence, waived filing a motion in arrest of judgment, and 

acknowledged and waived his right of allocution. The court accepted the written 

plea and waiver of rights, and sentenced Verbeek consistent with the plea 

agreement, reciting that the reasons for the sentence were “the Defendant’s prior 

record, the plea agreement, and the nature of the offense.” Verbeek has 

appealed the sentence, claiming the court did not articulate enough factors to 

demonstrate that exercised its sentencing discretion.

Verbeek waived any delay in sentencing, requested immediate 

sentencing, and specifically waived his right to address the court before 

sentencing or to argue in mitigation of the sentence. The written plea accurately 

recited the plea agreement he made with the State, offered no objection to the 

State’s recommendation, and made no independent recommendation or request 

 

1 An Alford plea allows a defendant to consent to the imposition of a prison sentence 

without admitting participation in the acts constituting the crime. See North Carolina v. 

Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37 (1970).
3

of his own. The court granted his request for immediate sentencing without his 

presence. On this record, the court exercised its discretion based on the 

information it had before it.

AFFIRMED.
Summary of the Terms of the 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.32 
 Summary of 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan 
 Annual bonuses in 2009
shall be paid pursuant to this 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan, subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee to make such adjustments as it deems appropriate, including in certain instances, its discretion to exceed the maximum amount
otherwise payable under the plan. The common bonus pool amount shall be $15 million. Those eligible for payout from the common bonus pool include all employees, with the exception of the non-exempt hourly plant workers at the Belpre Plant, on the
payroll as of December 31, 2007. The Incentive Compensation Plan is intended to encourage strong performance on factors that are key to Kraton’s growth and success. 
 A participant’s initial bonus amount is determined as follows: 
  

																	
	Participant’s	  		  	Target	  		  	Kraton	  		  	Individual	  		  	Amount allocated from
	Base Salary	  	X	  	 Bonus
 Factor
 (%)
	  	X	  	 Performance
 Factor
	  	X	  	 Performance
 Factor
	  	+	  	 the additional
 $1,000,000 pool, if any


 Target Bonus Factor is a percentage of base salary and shall be established by the
Compensation Committee for each participant, unless specifically provided in such participant’s employment agreement. 
 Kraton’s
Performance Factor shall be determined through use of a sliding scale based on EBITDA generated by Kraton. For example, if Kraton successfully achieves EBITDA that is exactly equal to the EBITDA target as set in the annual business plan of
Kraton, then the Kraton performance factor would be 1. The annual business plan also establishes a stretch EBITDA target, which if achieved or exceeded, would result in a Kraton performance factor of 2. The Kraton performance factor can never exceed
2. Sixty-five percent of the EBITDA target is a minimum threshold below which the Kraton performance factor, and thus the common bonus pool, would be zero. If actual EBITDA falls between 65% of EBITDA and the stretch EBITDA target, the Kraton
performance factor is adjusted based on a sliding scale. 
 The Individual Performance Factor shall be determined after review by the
Compensation Committee of that executive’s key contributions and key weaknesses for the year on an aggregate basis and is not based on a mathematical or formulaic method and no objectively determinable weighting is applied. Each
participant’s individual performance factor shall range from 0 to 2.0. 
 An Additional Bonus Pool of up to $1 million may be added
or subtracted from the common bonus pool amount based on additional performance criteria. 
 Adjustments Initial bonus amounts are
adjusted downwards as necessary so as not to exceed the common bonus pool amount or maximum payouts as established by employment contracts. 
 Targets The Compensation Committee determined the performance targets for the 2009 Incentive Plan in first quarter 2009.
# Den Europæiske Unions C 171/1. j

| | ISSN 1725-2393 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 171 |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 47. årgang1. juli 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2393

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 171

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

47. årgang1. juli 2004

---

| Informationsnummer | Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Meddelelser |
| | Kommissionen |
| 2004/C 171/1 | Euroens vekselkurs | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Indhold

Side

I   Meddelelser

Kommissionen

2004/C 171/1

Euroens vekselkurs

1

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

I Meddelelser

Kommissionen

| 1.7.2004 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | C 171/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2004

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

C 171/1

---

Euroens vekselkurs (1)

30. juni 2004

(2004/C 171/01)

1 Euro=

| | Valuta | Kurs |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | amerikanske dollar | 1,2155 |
| JPY | japanske yen | 132,40 |
| DKK | danske kroner | 7,4326 |
| GBP | pund sterling | 0,67075 |
| SEK | svenske kroner | 9,1451 |
| CHF | schweiziske franc | 1,5242 |
| ISK | islandske kroner | 88,33 |
| NOK | norske kroner | 8,4365 |
| BGN | bulgarske lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | cypriotiske pund | 0,58150 |
| CZK | tjekkiske koruna | 31,755 |
| EEK | estiske kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | ungarske forint | 251,60 |
| LTL | litauiske litas | 3,4529 |
| LVL | lettiske lats | 0,6570 |
| MTL | maltesiske lira | 0,4263 |
| PLN | polske zloty | 4,5236 |
| ROL | rumænske leu | 40 626 |
| SIT | slovenske tolar | 239,9900 |
| SKK | slovakiske koruna | 39,875 |
| TRL | tyrkiske lira | 1 805 300 |
| AUD | australske dollar | 1,7554 |
| CAD | canadiske dollar | 1,6343 |
| HKD | hongkongske dollar | 9,4803 |
| NZD | newzealandske dollar | 1,9210 |
| SGD | singaporeanske dollar | 2,0901 |
| KRW | sydkoreanske won | 1 404,45 |
| ZAR | sydafrikanske rand | 7,6177 |

Valuta

Kurs

USD

amerikanske dollar

1,2155

JPY

japanske yen

132,40

DKK

danske kroner

7,4326

GBP

pund sterling

0,67075

SEK

svenske kroner

9,1451

CHF

schweiziske franc

1,5242

ISK

islandske kroner

88,33

NOK

norske kroner

8,4365

BGN

bulgarske lev

1,9559

CYP

cypriotiske pund

0,58150

CZK

tjekkiske koruna

31,755

EEK

estiske kroon

15,6466

HUF

ungarske forint

251,60

LTL

litauiske litas

3,4529

LVL

lettiske lats

0,6570

MTL

maltesiske lira

0,4263

PLN

polske zloty

4,5236

ROL

rumænske leu

40 626

SIT

slovenske tolar

239,9900

SKK

slovakiske koruna

39,875

TRL

tyrkiske lira

1 805 300

AUD

australske dollar

1,7554

CAD

canadiske dollar

1,6343

HKD

hongkongske dollar

9,4803

NZD

newzealandske dollar

1,9210

SGD

singaporeanske dollar

2,0901

KRW

sydkoreanske won

1 404,45

ZAR

sydafrikanske rand

7,6177

---

(1)

Kilde: Referencekurs offentliggjort af Den Europæiske Centralbank.

---
§ 1987.101 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Assistant Secretary* means the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health or the person or persons to whom he or she delegates authority under FSMA.
( b ) *Business days* means days other than Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays.
( c ) *Complainant* means the employee who filed a complaint under FSMA or on whose behalf a complaint was filed.
( d ) *Covered entity* means an entity engaged in the manufacture, processing, packing, transporting, distribution, reception, holding, or importation of food.
( e ) *Employee* means an individual presently or formerly working for a covered entity, an individual applying to work for a covered entity, or an individual whose employment could be affected by a covered entity.
( f ) *FD&C* means the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. 301 *et seq.,* which is chapter 9 of title 21.
( g ) *FDA* means the Food and Drug Administration of the United States Department of Health and Human Services.
( h ) *Food* means articles used for food or drink for man or other animals, chewing gum, and articles used for components of any such article.
( i ) *FSMA* means section 402 of the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act, Public Law 111-353, 124 Stat. 3885 (Jan. 4, 2011) (codified at 21 U.S.C. 399d).
( j ) *OSHA* means the Occupational Safety and Health Administration of the United States Department of Labor.
( k ) *Person* includes an individual, partnership, corporation, and association.
( l ) *Respondent* means the employer named in the complaint who is alleged to have violated the FSMA.
( m ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of Labor or person to whom authority under the FSMA has been delegated.
( n ) Any future statutory amendments that affect the definition of a term or terms listed in this section will apply in lieu of the definition stated herein.
[entire page is

confidential]
§ 2400.6 Procedures for amending personal records. ( a ) *Submission of requests for amendment.* Upon review of an individual's personal record, that individual may submit a request to amend such record. This request shall be submitted in writing to the Privacy Officer, in accordance with § 2400.4(a)(1)'s procedures, and shall include a statement of the amendment requested and the reasons for such amendment, e.g., relevance, accuracy, timeliness or completeness of the record.
( b ) *Action to be taken by the Privacy Officer.* Upon receiving an amendment request, the Privacy Officer shall promptly: ( 1 ) Acknowledge in writing within 10 working days the receipt of the request;
( 2 ) Make such inquiry as is necessary to determine whether the amendment is appropriate; and
( 3 ) Resolve the request by either: ( i ) Correcting or eliminating any information that is found to be incomplete, inaccurate, irrelevant to a statutory purpose of OSHRC, or untimely and notifying the requester in writing when this action is complete; or
( ii ) Notifying the requester in writing of a determination not to amend the personal record, including the reasons for the denial, and advising the requester of his or her right to appeal in accordance with § 2400.7.