alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### D. H. Arline and Others, *Appellants,*v. G. W. Judy and A. J. Knight, Copartners, *Appellees.*

This case was decided by Division A.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County.

*M. (J. Gibbons*and *W. F.*Himes, for Plaintiff in Error.

*J. W.*Frasier, for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

Upon a bill without equity, the Circuit Judge, without notice to the defendants, granted an injunction without bond. He subsequently certified his disqualification by relationship to the complainants.

The order is reversed.
Exhibit
32.2   Section 1350 Certification





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens First Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, J.
Steven Marcum, Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
            /s/ J. Steven MarcumJ.
      Steven MarcumExecutive
      Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
            April
      30, 2010








This
certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed ‘filed” for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability
of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act
or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
Exhibit 10.15

       First Amendment to Employment Agreement between Citizens First
         Corporation and Barry D. Bray

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         This AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of
this  10th day of May,  1999,  by and  between  CITIZENS  FIRST  CORPORATION,  a
Kentucky corporation ("Employer"), and Barry Bray, and individual ("Bray").

         Employer and Bray agree to amend  paragraph 5 (five) of the  employment
agreement  entered  into as of the18th day of  December  1998 by and between the
employer  and Bray to adjust  Bray's  annualized  salary  rate from  $63,750  to
$85,000  payable  in  equal  bi-weekly   installments  effective  May  1,  1999.
Additionally,  the Employer's President and Chief Executive Officer shall review
Bray's salary on an annual basis rather than on a quarterly basis. Bray's salary
for any calendar year after 1999 shall be at the annualized rated established by
Employer at the commencement of each such year.


BY:      _________________________
         Mary Cohron, President & CEO


         -------------------------
         Barry Bray
EXHIBIT 32

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Virginia corporation (the Company), for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such
officers knowledge, that:



|1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in the Report.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 2, 2007 |  | /s/ Michael E. Campbell
|                      |  | Michael E. Campbell    
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      | 
|Dated: August 2, 2007 |  | /s/ Steven C. Giuliano 
|                      |  | Steven C. Giuliano     
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Arch Chemicals, Inc.
and will be retained by Arch Chemicals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Daniel Dror,
CEO, President and Chairman of American International Industries, Inc., pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

I, Daniel Dror, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report
on Form 10-QSB of American International Industries, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, 
I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the undersigned by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as
of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report management's conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors:

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.  I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 31, 2006, 
Daniel Dror, CEO, 
CEO, President and Chairman/s/ Daniel Dror
# EUR-Lex - 32000D0371 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000D0371

**2000/371/EC: Commission Decision of 6 June 2000 setting the date on which dispatch of fighting bulls from Portugal to France may commence by virtue of Article 3(7) of Decision 98/653/EC (notified under document number C(2000) 1563) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 134 , 07/06/2000 P. 0034 - 0034 *

Commission Decision

of 6 June 2000

setting the date on which dispatch of fighting bulls from Portugal to France may commence by virtue of Article 3(7) of Decision 98/653/EC

(notified under document number C(2000) 1563)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2000/371/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market(1), as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC(2),

Having regard to Commission Decision 98/653/EC of 18 November 1998 concerning emergency measures made necessary by the occurrence of bovine spongiform encephalopathy in Portugal(3), as last amended by Decision 2000/104/EC(4), and in particular Article 3(7) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 3(7) of Decision 98/653/EC requires the Commission to set the date on which dispatch of fighting bulls may commence, after having assessed the protocols referred to in Annex II point 13 and after having informed the Member States.

(2) The protocols submitted by France have been assessed and found to be satisfactory,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The date referred to in Article 3(7) of Decision 98/653/EC shall be 7 June 2000 for dispatch of fighting bulls to France.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 June 2000.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 29.

(2) OJ L 62, 15.3.1993, p. 49.

(3) OJ L 311, 20.11.1998, p. 23.

(4) OJ L 29, 4.2.2000, p. 36.
§ 1919.81 Examination of bulk cargo loading or discharging spouts or suckers. ( a ) Those portions of bulk cargo loading or discharging spouts or suckers which extend over vessels, together with any portable extensions, rigging components, outriggers, and attachment points supporting them or any of their components vertically, shall be examined annually. The examination shall be carried out with particular attention to the condition of wire rope and accessories. The equipment shall not be considered satisfactory unless, in the opinion of the accredited person or his authorized representative, it is deemed fit to serve its intended function.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00205-CV

Kip Allison

v.

Conglomerate Gas II L.P., Crestview 

Farm 250 L.P., Crestview Farm, 

L.L.C., Crestview Farm, L.L.C. “A 

Montana L.L.C.,” Crestview Farm 

Aiken, L.L.C., The Barnett Shale 

Water Conservation Co., 

Conglomerate Gas, L.L.C., 

Conglomerate Gas I, L.P., 

Conglomerate Holding L.L.C., 

Conglomerate Gas III, L.L.C., Dan 

Meeker Management, Inc., 

Vancouver Sky Management, L.L.C., 

Tracy Bolt as Trustee of the David 

Alan Meeker Family Irrevocable 

Trust, Thomas Ballard as Trustee of 

the Dan H. Meeker Children’s 

Irrevocable Trust, and Clifford Ginn

§

§ 

§ 

§

From the 342nd District Court

of Tarrant County (342-236004-09)

August 31, 2015

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed. 
It is further ordered that appellant Kip Allison shall pay all of the costs of 

this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Terrie Livingston 

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
§ 1917.17 Railroad facilities. ( a ) Work shall be performed in railcars only if floors of the railcars are in visibly safe condition for the work activity being conducted and equipment being used.
( b ) A route shall be established to allow employees to pass to and from places of employment without passing under, over or through railcars, or between cars less than 10 feet (3 m) apart on the same track.
( c ) The employer shall direct that no employees remain in railcars after work is concluded.
( d ) Railcars shall be chocked or otherwise prevented from moving: ( 1 ) While dockboards or carplates are in position; or
( 2 ) While employees are working within, on or under the railcars or near the tracks at the ends of the cars.
( e ) When employees are working in, on, or under a railcar, positive means shall be taken to protect them from exposure to impact from moving railcars.
( f ) Before cars are moved, unsecured and overhanging stakes, wire straps, banding and similar objects shall be removed or placed so as not to create hazards.
( g ) The employer shall institute all necessary controls during railcar movement to safeguard personnel. If winches or capstans are employed for movement, employees shall stand clear of the hauling rope and shall not stand between the rope and the cars.
( h ) Before being opened fully, doors shall be opened slightly to ensure that the load has not shifted during transit. Special precautions shall be taken if the doors being opened are visibly damaged.
( i ) If powered industrial trucks are used to open railcar doors, the trucks or the railcar doors shall be equipped with door opening attachments. Employees shall stand clear of the railcar doors while they are being opened and closed.
( j ) Only railcar door openers or powered industrial trucks equipped with door opening attachments shall be used to open jammed doors.
( k ) Employees shall not remain in or on gondolas or flat cars when drafts that create overhead, caught-in, caught-between or struck-by hazards are being landed in or on the railcar; end gates, if raised, shall be secured.
( l ) Operators of railcar dumps shall have an unrestricted view of dumping operations and shall have emergency means of stopping movement.
( m ) Recessed railroad switches shall be enclosed to provide a level surface.
( n ) Warning signs shall be posted where doorways open onto tracks, at blind corners and at similar places where vision may be restricted.
( o ) Warning signs shall be posted if insufficient clearance for personnel exists between railcars and structures.
[48 FR 30909, July 5, 1983, as amended at 62 FR 40197, July 25, 1997]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

                    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463, as amended), the National                           ( print page 31617)                        Science Foundation announces the following meeting.                

*Name:*                         U.S. National Assessment Synthesis Team (#5219).                    

*Date and Time:*                         May 31, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m., June 1, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Renaissance Hotel, 999 Ninth Street, NW, Washington DC 20001.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Thomas Spence, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Suite 705, Arlington, VA 22230. Tel. 703-306-1502; Fax: 703-306-0372; E-mail: tspence@nsf.gov. Interested persons should contact Ms. Susan Henson at the above number as soon as possible to ensure space provisions are made for all participants and observers.                    

*Minutes:*                         May be obtained subsequent to the meeting from the contact person listed above.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To review preparation of the report the National Assessment Synthesis Team is preparing for the interagency Subcommittee on Global Change Research to report on the findings of the National Assessment of the potential consequences of climate variability and climate change for the United States.                    

*Agenda:*                         Day 1 (May 31): Members will review technical comments received and will discuss revisions to report; and opportunity for public comment will be provided in later afternoon. Day 2 (June 1): Discussion of technical comments and revisions will continue.                    

Dated: May 12, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-12454  Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis

RONNIE HAWKINS

v. Record No. 1918-96-3 MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM HAR LEE COAL COMPANY JANUARY 7, 1997 AND EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Karel Brown Ryan, on briefs), for appellant. (Michael F. Blair; Penn, Stuart & Eskridge, on brief), for appellees.

Ronnie Hawkins contends that the Workers' Compensation Commission erred in finding that he failed to prove that his disability after May 4, 1994 and Dr. Daniel Robertson's treatment beginning July 22, 1994 were causally related to his August 19, 1993 compensable injury by accident. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's

decision. Rule 5A:27. On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party below. R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v.

Mullins , 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990). Unless we can say as a matter of law that Hawkins' evidence sustained his burden of proving causation, the commission's

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.2 findings are binding and conclusive upon us. Tomko v. Michael's Plastering Co. , 210 Va. 697, 699, 173 S.E.2d 833, 835 (1970).

Dr. Kurtz E. Alderman treated Hawkins both before and after the August 19, 1993 work-related accident. Immediately following the August 19, 1993 accident, Dr. Alderman diagnosed Hawkins as suffering from an acute lumbar strain. Dr. Alderman opined that Hawkins could return to work in seven to ten days. Hawkins returned to his pre-injury job on August 23, 1993, and continued to work until May 3, 1994. Dr. Alderman, who was aware of Hawkins' extensive history of back injuries including the August 19, 1993 incident, prepared a May 9, 1994 disability statement. The statement referenced on-going recurrent symptoms of several years' duration and did not mention the August 19, 1993 accident. In its role as fact finder, the commission was entitled to weigh the medical evidence, accept the opinion of Dr. Alderman, and reject the contrary opinion of Dr. Robertson. "Questions of conflicting medical opinions must be decided by the commission."

Penley v. Island Creek Coal Co. , 8 Va. App. 310, 318, 381 S.E.2d 231, 236 (1989). Dr. Robertson based his opinion concerning causation on an inaccurate and incomplete medical history. Where a medical opinion is based upon an incomplete or inaccurate medical history, the commission is entitled to conclude that the opinion is of little probative value. See Clinchfield Coal Co.

v. Bowman , 229 Va. 249, 251-52, 329 S.E.2d 15, 16 (1985). Absent Dr. Robertson's opinion, no medical evidence3 established that Hawkins' post-May 4, 1994 disability and medical treatment were causally related to his compensable August 19, 1993 injury by accident. Accordingly, we cannot find as a matter of law that Hawkins' evidence sustained his burden of proof. For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision.

Affirmed.
# EUR-Lex - 31999Y0728(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999Y0728(01)

**Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Council Directive 88/378/EEC of 3 May 1988 concerning the approximation of the laws of the Member States referring to the safety of toys (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal C 215 , 28/07/1999 P. 0004 - 0004 *

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Council Directive 88/378/EEC of 3 May 1988 concerning the approximation of the laws of the Member States referring to the safety of toys(1)

(1999/C 215/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Publication of titles and references of European harmonized standards under the Directive

>TABLE>

NOTE:

- any information concerning the availability of the standards can be obtained either from the European standardisation organisations or from the national standardisation bodies of which the list is annexed to European Parliament and Council Directive 98/34/EC(2), as amended by Directive 98/48/EC(3);

- publication of the references in the Official Journal of the European Communities does not imply that the standards are available in all the Community languages.

This publication does not concern the C-weighted peak emission sound pressure level produced by a toy using percussion caps, as referred to in Clause 4.20 d) of standard EN 71-1:1998, in respect of which it allows no presumption of conformity to the provisions of Directive 88/378/EEC.

(1) OJ L 187, 16.7.1988.

(2) OJ L 204, 21.7.1998, p. 37.

(3) OJ L 217, 5.8.1998, p. 18.