alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4826 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4826

To waive an advance notice requirement with respect to the Four Forest 
          Restoration Initiative Phase 2 Stewardship contract.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 21 (legislative day, October 19), 2020

  Ms. McSally introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To waive an advance notice requirement with respect to the Four Forest 
          Restoration Initiative Phase 2 Stewardship contract.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CANCELLATION CEILING.

    (a) Waiver of Advance Notice.--The 30-day advance notice 
requirement under paragraph (2) of section 604(h) of the Healthy 
Forests Restoration Act of 2003 (16 U.S.C. 6591c(h)) and the 14-day 
notice requirement under paragraph (3) of that section shall not apply 
to the Four Forest Restoration Initiative (4FRI) Phase 2 Stewardship 
contract (solicitation 12837119R4005).
    (b) Notice.--Not later than 7 days after entering into the Four 
Forest Restoration Initiative (4FRI) Phase 2 Stewardship contract 
(solicitation 12837119R4005), the Chief of the Forest Service shall 
submit the notices otherwise required under paragraphs (2) and (3) of 
section 604(h) of the Healthy Forests Restoration Act of 2003 (16 
U.S.C. 6591c(h)).
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1202.6 Access to carrier records.

Under the Railway Labor Act the Board has access to and has power to make copies of the books and records of the carriers to obtain and utilize such information as may be necessary to fulfill its duties with respect to representatives of carrier employees.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 12 , 2016 

# Order

Clerk August 12 , 2016

15 3 98 9 ( 6 7 )

TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY FIVE WEST

HICKORY GROVE, LLC

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

, SC: 153989

v COA: 32 4300

Oakland CC : 2014

- 138370

- CH

ELBERT L. HATCHETT and LAURESTINE

W. HATCHETT

, Defendants

- Appell ant s

, and

UNTIED STATES OF AMERICA and

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,

Defendants

.

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of defendants

- appellants to exceed the

page limit restriction for its reply is GRANTED. The reply and addendum submitted on

August 8, 2016, and August 9, 2016, respectively, are accepted for filing

.
§ 1919.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The regulations in this Part implement §§ 1915.115, 1917.50 and 1918.11 of this chapter. They provide procedures and standards governing accreditation of persons by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, for the purpose of certificating vessels' cargo gear and shore-based material handling devices, and the manner in which such certification shall be performed.
( b ) Accreditation is not required, and the regulations of this part are not applicable, under the following circumstances: ( 1 ) When cargo gear certification is performed for vessels inspected and certificated under the authority of the U.S. Coast Guard,[1] or for foreign vessels certificated under the requirements of a foreign nation or by persons acceptable for certification purposes by a foreign nation.
( 2 ) When cargo gear certification is performed for shore-based material handling devices under standards established and enforced by the States wherein the devices are located, or by political subdivisions delegated this responsibility by the States, provided such standards meet the requirements of § 1917.50(b)(2) of this chapter.
( c ) Persons not required to be accredited for gear certification purposes, as set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, may, nevertheless, apply for and receive accreditation by the Administration. The appropriate subparts of this part shall apply to persons accredited pursuant to this paragraph except insofar as exemptions may be granted.
[39 FR 22096, June 19, 1974, as amended at 65 FR 40951, June 30, 2000] Footnotes -
1919.1
[1] Jurisdiction of the U.S. Coast Guard extends to matters within the scope of title 52 of the Revised Statutes and Acts supplementary or amendatory thereto (46 U.S.C. 1-1388, passim); to matters within the regulatory authority of the U.S. Coast Guard under the provisions of the Espionage Act of June 15, 1917, as amended (40 Stat. 220; 50 U.S.C. 191 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 401 et seq.) or to matters within the regulatory authority of the U.S. Coast Guard under section 4(e) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act of Aug. 7, 1953 (67 Stat. 462; 43 U.S.C. 1333).
§ 1405.6 Program coordination. The Director of Personnel is designated the FMCS Part-time Employment Coordinator with responsibility for: ( a ) Consulting in the part-time employment program with the Director of Equal Employment Opportunity, Federal Women's Program Coordinator, Handicapped Program Coordinator, representatives of employee unions, and other interested parties;
( b ) Responding to requests for advice and assistance on part-time employment within the agency;
( c ) Maintaining liaison with groups interested in promoting part-time employment opportunities;
( d ) Monitoring the agency's part-time employment efforts; and preparing reports on part-time employment for transmittal to OPM and the Congress.
#### § 1404.13 Conduct of hearings.

All proceedings conducted by the arbitrators shall conform to the contractual obligations of the parties, and to the Code. The arbitrator shall comply with § 1404.4(b). The conduct of the arbitration proceeding is under the arbitrator's jurisdiction and control, and the arbitrator's decision shall be based upon the evidence and testimony presented at the hearing or otherwise incorporated in the record of the proceeding. The arbitrator may, unless prohibited by law, proceed in the absence of any party who, after due notice, fails to be present or to obtain a postponement. An award rendered in an ex parte proceeding of this nature must be based upon evidence presented to the arbitrator.
#### BAYLOR v BUTLER

Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Lorain Co

No 475,

Decided Jan 9, 1929

F M Stevens and Cyril J Maple, both of Elyria, for Baylor.

Geo L Glitsch, Lorain and H W Ingersoll, Elyria, for Butler.

PER CURIAM

We have carefully considered the errors relating to the second cause of action claimed by the plaintiff, and while we find that there were some errors, we do not find that they were prejudicial, so as to prevent the plaintiff from having a fair trial, and we do find that the trial on that cause of action resulted in substantial justice being done, under the facts which the jury were warranted in finding.

As to the first cause of action, we find that the trial court was in error in ruling that there was a substantial variance between the allegations of the petition and the proof, and that therefore there was no evidence tending to prove the allegations of the first-cause of action. The trial judge should have applied to the first cause of action the law that he directed the jury to apply to the second cause of action, when he charged the jury that—

> *“It is*not necessary that the plantiff, in order to recover, should have proven that the exact words set forth in said second cause of action were used, or that all of said words were used, but if you find from the evidence that the defendant used words conveying the same meaning as those set forth in said second cause of action, and that the same charged the plaintiff with trickery, artifice deceit and fraud in the conduct of his business in crying sales as an auctioneer, that would be sufficient, so far as the charge of slander set forth in said second cause of action is concerned.”

The judgment is therefore affirmed as to the second cause of action in plaintiff’s petition, and reversed as to the first cause of action in plaintiff’s petition, and the cause remanded to the Court of Common Pleas for further proceedings according to law; each party to pay one-half of the costs in both the Court of Common Pleas and Court of Appeals.

Washburn, PJ, Funk, J, and Pardee, J, concur.
§ 1209.02 Definitions. For purposes of this part: ( a ) The terms *Board* or *Agency* mean the National Mediation Board, a collegial body composed of three members appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate.
( b ) The term *meeting* means the deliberations of at least two members of the Board where such deliberations determine or result in the joint conduct or disposition of official agency business, but does not include deliberations required or permitted or with respect to any information proposed to be withheld under by 5 U.S.C. 552b(d) or (e)/5 U.S.C. 552b(c).
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Malheur National WildlifeRefuge : comprehensive conservation plan**
 
 
Record of Decision
Vision Statement
Executive Summary
Table of Contents
Introduction and Background
Management Direction
Physical Environment
Biological Environment
Human Environment
Maps
Appendices
 
SuDoc Number:I 49.44/3-2:M 29
Item Number:0612-C-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000929828
 
March 28, 2018
§ 1917.27 Personnel. ( a ) *Qualifications of machinery operators.* ( 1 ) Only those employees determined by the employer to be competent by reason of training or experience, and who understand the signs, notices and operating instructions and are familiar with the signal code in use shall be permitted to operate a crane, winch or other power operated cargo handling apparatus, or any power operated vehicle, or give signals to the operator of any hoisting apparatus. *Exception:* Employees being trained and supervised by a designated person may operate such machinery and give signals to operators during training.
( 2 ) No employee known to have defective uncorrected eyesight or hearing, or to be suffering from heart disease, epilepsy, or similar ailments that may suddenly incapacitate the employee, shall be permitted to operate a crane, winch or other power-operated cargo handling apparatus or a power-operated vehicle. Note to paragraph ( a
)(2):
OSHA is defining suddenly incapacitating medical ailments consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12101 (1990). Therefore, employers who act in accordance with the employment provisions (Title I) of the ADA (42 U.S.C. 12111-12117), the regulations implementing Title I (29 CFR Part 1630), and the Technical Assistance Manual for Title I issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Publication number: EEOC—M1A), will be considered as being in compliance with this paragraph.
( b ) *Supervisory accident prevention proficiency.* ( 1 ) After October 3, 1985 immediate supervisors of cargo-handling operations of more than five (5) persons shall satisfactorily complete a course in accident prevention. Employees newly assigned to supervisory duties after that date shall be required to meet the provisions of this paragraph within ninety (90) days of such assignment.
( 2 ) The course shall consist of instruction suited to the particular operations involved.[3]
[48 FR 30909, July 5, 1983, as amended at 62 FR 40197, July 25, 1997; 65 FR 40938, June 30, 2000] Footnotes -
1917.27
[3] The following are recommended topics: (i) Safety responsibility and authority; (ii) elements of accident prevention; (iii) attitudes, leadership and motivation; (iv) hazards of longshoring, including peculiar local circumstances; (v) hazard identification and elimination; (vi) applicable regulations; and (vii) accident investigations.
AEO2014 Early Release Overview

Release Date: December 16, 2013

Full Report Release Date: Early Spring 2014

Figure 1. U.S. liquid fuels supply by source,1970-2040 (million barrels per day)

Crude oil 

production 

(excluding tight 

oil)

Tight oil 

production

Natural gas 

plant liquids Other

Net petroleum 

and biofuel 

imports

1970 9.64 0.00 1.66 0.36 3.16

9.46 0.00 1.69 0.38 3.70

9.44 0.00 1.74 0.39 4.52

9.21 0.00 1.74 0.45 6.02

8.77 0.00 1.69 0.48 5.89

1975 8.37 0.00 1.63 0.46 5.85

8.13 0.00 1.60 0.48 7.09

8.24 0.00 1.62 0.52 8.56

8.71 0.00 1.57 0.50 8.00

8.55 0.00 1.58 0.53 7.99

1980 8.60 0.00 1.57 0.60 6.36

8.57 0.00 1.61 0.51 5.40

8.65 0.00 1.55 0.55 4.30

8.69 0.00 1.56 0.51 4.31

8.88 0.00 1.63 0.59 4.72

1985 8.97 0.00 1.61 0.60 4.29

8.68 0.00 1.55 0.66 5.44

8.35 0.00 1.60 0.69 5.91

8.14 0.00 1.62 0.71 6.59

7.61 0.00 1.55 0.72 7.20

1990 7.36 0.00 1.56 0.73 7.16

7.42 0.01 1.66 0.77 6.63

7.17 0.01 1.70 0.84 6.94

6.85 0.01 1.74 0.84 7.62

6.66 0.00 1.73 0.85 8.05

1995 6.56 0.00 1.76 0.86 7.88

6.46 0.00 1.83 0.90 8.50

6.45 0.00 1.82 0.93 9.16

6.25 0.00 1.76 0.98 9.76

5.88 0.00 1.85 0.98 9.91

2000 5.57 0.26 1.91 1.06 10.42

5.55 0.25 1.87 1.02 10.90

5.50 0.25 1.88 1.09 10.55

5.43 0.25 1.72 1.16 11.24

5.16 0.26 1.81 1.28 12.09

2005 4.89 0.29 1.72 1.26 12.54

4.79 0.31 1.74 1.37 12.34

4.72 0.34 1.78 1.47 12.02

4.34 0.61 1.78 1.64 11.10

4.67 0.69 1.91 1.72 9.67
2010 4.61 0.87 2.07 1.92 9.47

4.35 1.31 2.18 1.98 8.51

4.24 2.25 2.40 2.17 7.50

4.25 3.48 2.49 2.17 6.37

4.46 4.07 2.51 2.21 5.41

2015 4.54 4.49 2.56 2.31 5.26

4.87 4.67 2.63 2.30 4.88

4.84 4.72 2.66 2.32 4.94

4.82 4.76 2.67 2.32 4.96

4.83 4.78 2.67 2.32 4.94

2020 4.76 4.79 2.65 2.32 5.00

4.62 4.80 2.61 2.32 5.13

4.54 4.74 2.70 2.31 5.13

4.51 4.68 2.79 2.30 5.11

4.46 4.61 2.84 2.28 5.13

2025 4.46 4.54 2.87 2.27 5.12

4.36 4.47 2.90 2.25 5.19

4.25 4.42 2.92 2.24 5.28

4.17 4.34 2.94 2.24 5.37

4.12 4.26 2.95 2.23 5.42

2030 4.14 4.17 2.98 2.23 5.41

4.08 4.08 3.01 2.23 5.48

4.09 3.98 3.03 2.23 5.51

4.16 3.88 3.04 2.23 5.49

4.20 3.79 3.05 2.22 5.51

2035 4.18 3.69 3.05 2.22 5.61

4.17 3.58 3.03 2.22 5.73

4.21 3.49 3.06 2.22 5.77

4.17 3.39 3.04 2.22 5.93

4.24 3.29 3.01 2.24 5.97

2040 4.28 3.20 2.98 2.24 6.02
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Jupiter Marine
International Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ending July 27, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl Herndon, Principal Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/Carl Herndon
    ---------------
    Carl Herndon
    Principal Executive Officer
    June 3, 2003
U S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
 

Bureau of Land Management
 

HiLine District 

Soil

Wind Eros i 

s 

Water Eros

&

i

on Hazard 

on Hazard 

Maps show the Wind Erosion and 

Water Erosion Hazard Classifications 

for the HiLine District RMP 

Soils Wind Erosion Hazard 

Map W.11 

¬
 

Created by the Malta Field Office in December 2012 Albers Equal Area, NAD83, Meters 

0 20 40 

Miles 

1:2,300,000 

Soils Water Erosion Hazard 

This map is intended for display purposes 

No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, 

reliability, or completeness of these data

for individual or aggregate use with other 

data, or for purposes not intended by the 

BLM This map may not meet National

Map Accuracy Standards This product 

was developed through digital means and 

information may be updated without 

notification 

Wind Erosion 

Hazard Classification 

Severe 

Moderate 

Slight 

Not Rated 

Water 

Non Project Areas 

Water Erosion 

Hazard Classification 

Severe 

Moderate 

Slight 

Not Rated 

Water 

Non Project Areas
#### § 2.2 Employees attached to Washington office.

No person who has been an employee of the Department and attached to the Washington office of any bureau, board, division, or other agency thereof, shall be permitted to practice, appear, or act as attorney, agent, or representative before the Department or any branch or agent thereof, in connection with any case or administrative proceeding pending before such bureau, board, division, or other agency during the time of his employment with the Department, unless he shall first obtain the written consent thereto of the Secretary of Labor or his duly authorized representative.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1403

EVERTON ANTHONY SURGEON,
Petitioner - Appellant,

v.
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,
Respondent - Appellee.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: November 12, 2008 Decided: December 22, 2008

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Linda A. Dominguez, L.A. DOMINGUEZ LAW, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, William C. Peachey, Assistant Director, Brianne Whelan Cohen, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Everton Anthony Surgeon, a native and citizen of
Jamaica, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying his motions to reopen and reconsider.
We have reviewed the administrative record and Surgeon’s claims

and find that the claims are without merit. See Afanwi v.
Mukasey , 526 F.3d 788 (4th Cir. 2008) (holding that there is no
constitutional right under the Fifth Amendment to effective
assistance of counsel in removal proceedings). We accordingly
deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the

Board. See In re: Surgeon (B.I.A. Mar. 18, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### GEORGE W. BLANKENSHIP v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BRECKENRIDGE.1

November 20, 1896.

Nos. 10,132 — (73).

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Wilkin county, C. L. Brown, J., overruling a demurrer to the complaint.

Affirmed.

*Ezra O. Valentme*and *Lyman B. Ekerdell,*for appellant.

*H. A. Tripp,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 68 N. W. 1102.

*257PER CURIAM.

This case is governed by the rule laid down in Endres v. First Nat. Bank of Breckenridge, infra, 68 N. W. 1092, as to the jurisdiction of the state courts over the subject-matter involved.

Order affirmed.
§ 1410.6 Requests for correction or amendment of records. ( a ) If the individual disagrees with the information in the record, he may request that the record be amended by addition or deletion. Such a request must be in writing and directed to the Director of Administration, Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, Washington, DC, 20427. The request must also specifically outline the amendment sought. The Director of Administration or his designated representative will acknowledge receipt of the request within 10 working days from the date of receipt of such request. Under normal circumstances, not later than 30 days after receipt of the request for amendments, the Director of Administration will either: ( 1 ) Amend the record and notify the requestor in a written letter of determination to what extent the record is amended; or
( 2 ) If the amendment or correction is denied in whole or in part, notify the requestor in a written letter of determination the reason for denial and the requestor's right to request review by the Deputy National Director.
( b ) Routine requests of arbitrators maintained on the Service's roster of arbitrators to amend records for such matters as address, experience, fees charged, may be made in writing to the Director of Arbitration Services, Washington, DC, 20427. If such routine requests are not granted or involve other types of amendments, then the procedure to be followed is that which includes a request in writing to the Director of Administration.
# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 04, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21A0386. JUSTIN LATTIMORE v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On October 28, 2020, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than November 09, 2020. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a). Because procedural deficiencies have deprived the appellant of the right of appellate review, the appellant is hereby informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995): This Court has dismissed your appeal because an enumeration of errors and a brief have not been filed on your behalf as required. If this failure occurred while you were represented by legal counsel and was due to your appellate counsel's failure to perform the duties of appellate counsel, and if you still wish to appeal, you may file a motion in the trial court for permission to pursue an out-of-time appeal. If the trial court grants your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order granting your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence. If the trial court denies your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order denying your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from that order.Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 04, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant as well as to the appellant's attorney of record, if any. The appellant's attorney is also directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant.