alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                     Exhibit 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-18417) of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation of our
report dated June 3, 2002 relating to the financial statements, which appear in
the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report
dated June 3, 2002 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears
in this Form 10-K.


/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina
July 17, 2002
The U.S. Small Business Administration National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board will hold a public meeting on Sunday, February 6, 2000, from 9 am to 4 pm at the Le Richelieu Hotel, New Orleans, Louisiana to discuss such matters as may be presented by members, staff of the U.S. Small Business Administration, or others present. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Please write or call Ellen Thrasher, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW, Fourth Floor, Washington, DC 20416, telephone number (202) 205-6817. 

Kris Swedin, 

Chief of Staff. 

[FR Doc. 00-1231 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Crdentia Corp. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James J. TerBeest, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for thepurposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, thatto my knowledge:

1.                                       the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.                                       theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the datesand for the periods indicated.

ThisCertification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with theSecurities and Exchange Commission.
| Date: August 14, 2007 | By:    | /s/ James J. TerBeest   |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                  |   | James J. TerBeest       |
|                  |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
§ 2400.7 Procedures for appealing. ( a ) *Submission of appeal.* ( 1 ) If a request to provide notification of a personal record, or to access or amend a personal record, is denied either in whole or in part, or if no determination is made within the period prescribed by this part, then the requester may appeal in writing to the Chairman by mailing an appeal letter to the following address: Privacy Appeal, OSHRC, One Lafayette Centre, 1120 20th Street NW, Ninth Floor, Washington, DC 20036-3457.
( 2 ) To be considered timely, the requester must submit the appeal letter within 30 calendar days of the date of denial, or within 90 calendar days of his or her request if the appeal is from a failure of the Privacy Officer to make a determination. The appeal letter should include, as applicable: ( i ) Reasonable identification of the system to which notification was sought, the personal record to which access was sought, or the amendment that was requested.
( ii ) A statement of the OSHRC action or failure to act being appealed and the relief sought.
( iii ) A copy of the request, the notification of denial, and any other related correspondence.
( b ) *Final decisions.* The Chairman must make a final decision no later than 30 working days from the date of the request, but the Chairman may extend this time period for good cause. The requester, however, must be notified of the extension within the initial 30 working-day period, and the extension may not exceed 90 calendar days from the date of the request. Any personal record found on appeal to be incomplete, inaccurate, irrelevant, or untimely, shall within 30 working days of the date of such findings be appropriately amended.
( c ) *Decision requirements.* The decision of the Chairman constitutes the final decision of OSHRC on the right of the requester to be notified of, or to access or amend, a personal record. The decision on the appeal shall be in writing and, in the event of a denial, shall set forth the reasons for such denial and state the individual's right to obtain judicial review in a district court of the United States. An indexed file of the agency's decisions on appeal shall be maintained by the Privacy Officer.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

August 8, 2019.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 19 -00593- CV

IN RE ELIZON MASTER PARTICIPATE TRUST I, U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS OWNER TRUSTEE SUCCESSOR- IN

INTEREST TO NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC D/B/A MR. COOPER , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 165th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018-44204



### MEMORANDUM OPINION On July 30, 2019, relator Elizon Master Participate Trust I, U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Owner Trustee Successor- In -Interest to Nationstar2

Mortgage LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 ( Supp. ); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this c ourt to compel the Honorable Ursula Hall, presiding judge of the 165th District Court of Harris County , to rule on r elator’s motion for substituted service

. On July 30, 2019, Judge Hall signed an order granting the motion for substituted service. On August 2, 2019, relator filed a motion to dismiss its petition for writ of mandamus.

We GRANT relator’s motion and DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot

.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       9
<CIK>                           1073475
<NAME>                          CITIZENS FIRST CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                          335,338
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>          394,514
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                5,900,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>     1,781,186
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>          0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>            0
<LOANS>                         2,518,649
<ALLOWANCE>                     25,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  12,813,423
<DEPOSITS>                      4,221,427
<SHORT-TERM>                    0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>             654,222
<LONG-TERM>                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        7,357,477
<OTHER-SE>                      580,297
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>  12,813,423
<INTEREST-LOAN>                 11,485
<INTEREST-INVEST>               6,166
<INTEREST-OTHER>                36,925
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                54,576
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>              8,028
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              19,920
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>           34,656
<LOAN-LOSSES>                   25,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>              743,706
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                 459,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 295,464
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    295,464
<EPS-BASIC>                   0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.83
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                  2.720
<LOANS-NON>                     0
<LOANS-PAST>                    0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                 0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                   0
<RECOVERIES>                    0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>               25,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>            25,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>             0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>         0



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 93 (Friday, May 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12036]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree, Under the Comprehensive, 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (``CERCLA'')

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that on April 28, 2000 a proposed Amendment Consent Decree 
in Civil Action No. 99-2673-Civ-T-24B was lodged with the United States 
District Court for the Middle District of Florida.
    In this action the United States sought injunctive relief and 
recovery of response costs under Sections 106(a) and 107 of CERCLA, 42 
U.S.C. 9606(a) and 9607, with respect to the Stauffer Chemical 
Superfund Site in Tarpon Springs, Florida (``the Site'').
    Under the proposed Amended Consent Decree, Atkemix Thirty-Seven, 
Inc., the present owner and operator of the Site, and Aventis 
CropScience USA, Inc., formerly Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company, Inc., the 
former owner and operator of the Site, have agreed to perform the 
remedy chosen by EPA to clean up the Site, pay the government's 
remaining past response costs, and pay future response costs, in 
settlement of the government's claims under Sections 106 and 107 of 
CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 9607.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20044-7611, and should refer to 
Untied States v. Atkemix Thirty-Seven, Inc., and Rhone-Poulenc Ag. 
Company, Inc., (M.D. FI.) DOJ# 90-11-2-1227/1.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, 400 North Tampa Street, Suite 3200, Tampa, 
Florida 33602, the Region 4 Office of the Environmental Protection 
Agency, 61 Forsythe Street, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, and at the Consent 
Decree Libra, Post Office Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. A copy 
of the proposed consent decree may be obtained by mail from the Consent 
Decree Library, Post Office Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. In 
requesting a copy please refer to the referenced case and enclose a 
check and enclose a check in the amount of 25 cents per page for 
reproduction costs, payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 00-12036 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 1926

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.98 [Reserved]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                      Washington, D.C. 20549
                            FORM 10-K/A

(Mark One)
[X]  Annual report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
     Act of 1934 [Fee Required] for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996 or
[ ] Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities 
    Exchange Act of 1934 [No Fee Required] for the transition period from 
    _______ to ________

Commission file number 2-18868

                KNAPE & VOGT MANUFACTURING COMPANY
      (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

               Michigan                             38-0722920
(State or other jurisdiction of        (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 incorporation or organization)

      2700 Oak Industrial Drive, N.E., Grand Rapids, MI     49505
       (Address of principal executive offices)          (Zip Code)

                          (616) 459-3311
       (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


        Securities registered pursuant to 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class              Name of each exchange on which registered
      None                                            None


       Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

             Common Stock, par value $2.00 per share
                         (Title of class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes __X__    No ____

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this Form 10-K. [X]

<PAGE>

ITEM 14--EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

Item 14 is hereby amended by adding the following exhibit to the Exhibit Index:

27   Financial Data Schedule

<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly cause this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                         KNAPE & VOGT MANUFACTURING COMPANY


                        By    /s/Allan E. Perry
                              Allan E. Perry, President and Chief 
                              Executive Officer


                         By   /s/Richard C. Simkins
                              Richard C. Simkins, Principal Financial and
                              Accounting Officer and Director
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as added by

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Pulaski Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:  December | 29, 2003
|--------------- | --------



/s/ Ramsey K. HamadiName:

Ramsey K. HamadiTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
#### SAYERS v STAHL

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist, Williams Co

No 184.

Decided April 21, 1930

Weaver & Weaver and C. L. Newcomer, Bryan, for Sayers.

Charles T. Stahl, Bryan, and E. C. Peck, Bryan, for Stahl.

BY THE COURT

There are in general only two grounds for the dissolution of an attachment: first, that the affidavit is insufficient, and, second, that the grounds stated in the affidavit are untrue. Swan’s Treatise, 20th Ed., page 480. The dissolution of the attachment was not made on either of these grounds. Under the circumstances the plaintiff had a right to have his attachment remain in force and his lien preserved until his claim was satisfied or the proceeds of the sale of the attached property, in so far as they were applicable] to his claim, were applied thereon. Upon sale of the property under the agreement, the lien would attach to the fund derived therefrom.

For the reasons given the judgment will be reversed and] the cause remanded with directions to overrule the motion “to dismiss” the attachment, and for further proceedings according to law not inconsistent with this opinion.

Williams, Lloyd and Richards, JJ., concur.
TS-CKHI01

Attachment #2

Summary of Information on the New Chemical Substance
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IGNACIO E. MONTANES,

 Appellant,

v.

CACH, LLC,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-14-00021-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law Number Three

of Dallas County, Texas 

(TC# CC-12-06973-C) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal and 

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. We therefore 

dismiss the appeal. We further order Appellant pay all costs of this appeal, and this decision be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 25TH DAY OF JULY, 2014.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
#### JAMES A. HEARN & SON v. UNITED STATES

[80 C. Cls. 260; 294 U. S. 722]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court March 18, 1935.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Population and Prevelance /
              - 1.10 Civilians Ages 18-64 Years Living in the Community for the U.S.-Cognitive Disability

## Table 1.10: Civilians Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for the United States and States—Cognitive Disability: 2012

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
#### Beatrice Friedman et al., Appellants, *v.*L. M. Beck et al., Respondents.

Submitted May 17, 1937;

decided May 25, 1937.

*Bert Hamburger*for motion.

*Joseph L. Forscher*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion, unless appellants perfect appeal within ten days, in which event the motion is denied.
§ 24.105 Issuance of findings and orders. ( a ) After considering all the relevant information collected during the investigation, the Assistant Secretary will issue, within 30 days of filing of the complaint, written findings as to whether or not there is reasonable cause to believe that the respondent has retaliated against the complainant in violation of any of the statutes listed in § 24.100(a). ( 1 ) If the Assistant Secretary concludes that there is reasonable cause to believe that a violation has occurred, he or she shall accompany the findings with an order providing relief to the complainant. The order shall include, where appropriate, a requirement that the respondent abate the violation; reinstate the complainant to his or her former position, together with the compensation (including back pay), terms, conditions and privileges of the complainant's employment; pay compensatory damages; and, under the Toxic Substances Control Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act, pay exemplary damages, where appropriate. At the complainant's request the order shall also assess against the respondent the complainant's costs and expenses (including attorney's fees) reasonably incurred in connection with the filing of the complaint.
( 2 ) If the Assistant Secretary concludes that a violation has not occurred, the Assistant Secretary will notify the parties of that finding.
( b ) The findings and order will be sent by means that allow OSHA to confirm delivery to all parties of record (and each party's legal counsel if the party is represented by counsel). The findings and order will inform the parties of their right to file objections and to request a hearing and provide the address of the Chief Administrative Law Judge. The Assistant Secretary will file a copy of the original complaint and a copy of the findings and order with the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Department of Labor.
( c ) The findings and order will be effective 30 days after receipt by the respondent (or the respondent's legal counsel if the respondent is represented by counsel) or on the compliance date set forth in the order, whichever is later, unless an objection and/or a request for a hearing has been filed as provided at § 24.106.
[76 FR 2820, Jan. 18, 2011, as amended at 86 FR 1782, Jan. 11, 2021]