alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 22.26 Form, filing and service of papers. ( a ) *Form.* ( 1 ) Documents filed with the ALJ shall include an original and two copies.
( 2 ) Every pleading and paper filed in the proceeding shall contain a caption setting forth the title of the action, the case number assigned by the ALJ, and a designation of the paper (e.g., motion to quash subpoena).
( 3 ) Every pleading and paper shall be signed by, and shall contain the address and telephone number of the party or the person on whose behalf the paper was filed, or his or her representative.
( 4 ) Papers are considered filed when they are mailed. Date of mailing may be established by a certificate from the party or its representative or by proof that the document was sent by certified or registered mail.
( b ) *Service.* A party filing a document with the ALJ shall, at the time of filing, serve a copy of such document on every other party. Service upon any party of any document other than those required to be served as prescribed in § 22.8 shall be made in accordance with 29 CFR part 18. When a party is represented by a representative, service shall be made upon such representative in lieu of the actual party.
( c ) *Proof of service.* A certificate of the individual serving the document, setting forth the manner of service, shall be proof of service.
[52 FR 48492, Dec. 22, 1987, as amended at 86 FR 1781, Jan. 11, 2021]
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Serena Software, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended
October 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert I. Pender, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods presented.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    ROBERT I. PENDER, JR.Robert I. Pender, Jr. Senior Vice President, Finance And Administration, Chief Financial Officer


Date: December 11, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Serena Software, Inc. and will be retained by
Serena Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification
is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Alfred Volckmann, Appellant.

Argued November 24, 1936;

decided December 31, 1936.

*Clermonte G. Tennant*for appellant.

*John C. Welsh, District Attorney,*for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
# EUR-Lex - 31997R1291 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31997R1291

**Council Regulation (EC) No 1291/97 of 27 June 1997 amending Regulation (EC) No 2505/96 opening and providing for the administration of autonomous Community tariff quotas for certain agricultural and industrial products and amending Regulation (EC) No 3059/95 opening and providing for the administration of Community tariff quotas for certain agricultural and industrial products (first series 1996) **

*
Official Journal L 176 , 04/07/1997 P. 0017 - 0020 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1291/97 of 27 June 1997 amending Regulation (EC) No 2505/96 opening and providing for the administration of autonomous Community tariff quotas for certain agricultural and industrial products and amending Regulation (EC) No 3059/95 opening and providing for the administration of Community tariff quotas for certain agricultural and industrial products (first series 1996)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 28 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas, by virtue of Regulation (EC) No 2505/96 (1), the Council opened Community tariff quotas for certain agricultural and industrial products; whereas Community demand for the products in question should be met under the most favourable conditions; whereas Community tariff quotas should therefore be opened at reduced or zero rates of duty for appropriate volumes, and increased or extended in the case of certain existing tariff quotas, avoiding any disturbance to the markets for these products;

Whereas the amendments made to Regulation (EC) No 3059/95 (2) by virtue of Regulation (EC) No 2505/96 are no longer valid; whereas the reference to Regulation (EC) No 3059/95 in the title of Regulation (EC) No 2505/96 should be deleted;

Whereas Regulation (EC) No 2505/96 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The title of Regulation (EC) No 2505/96 shall be replaced by the following:

'Council Regulation (EC) No 2505/96 of 20 December 1996 opening and providing for the administration of autonomous Community tariff quotas for certain agricultural and industrial products`.

Article 2

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2505/96 is hereby amended as follows:

- the table lines shown in Annex I shall be replaced, for order Nos 09.2711, 09.2837, 09.2935, 09.2939 and 09.2945, by those shown in Annex I to this Regulation;

- the tariff quotas shown in Annex II of this Regulation shall be added.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 1 January 1997.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 27 June 1997.

For the Council

The President

A. JORRITSMA-LEBBINK

(1) OJ No L 345, 31. 12. 1996, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 326, 30. 12. 1995, p. 19. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2505/96 (OJ No L 345, 31. 12. 1996, p. 1).

ANNEX I

>TABLE>

ANNEX II

>TABLE>
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 Certification
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001.
 
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of BIO-TRACKING SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
        (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I,
        Jean-Francois Amyot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act
        of 2001, that:
 
 The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: October
                  6, 2005
                By:
                /s/ Jean-Francois
                  AmyotJean-Francois
                    Amyot,Chief
                    Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 57 FR 31451, July 16, 1992.

§ 20.31 Administrative offset against amounts payable from Civil Service Retirement and Disability fund. ( a ) Unless otherwise prohibited by law, agencies may request that moneys which are due and payable to a debtor from the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund be administratively offset in reasonable amounts in order to collect debts owed to the United States by the debtor. Such requests shall be made to the appropriate officials of the Office of Personnel Management in accordance with such regulations as may be prescribed by the Director of that Office.
( b ) When making a request for administrative offset under paragraph (a) of this section, an agency shall include a written certification that: ( 1 ) The debtor owes the United States a debt, including the amount of the debt;
( 2 ) The requesting agency has complied with all applicable statutes, regulations, and procedures of the Office of Personnel Management; and
( 3 ) The requesting agency has complied with the requirements of the applicable provisions of the Federal Claims Collection Standards, including any required hearing or review.
( c ) Once an agency decides to request administrative offset under paragraph (a) of this section, it should make the request as soon as practical after completion of the applicable due process procedures in order that the Office of Personnel Management may identify and “flag” the debtor's account in anticipation of the time when the debtor becomes eligible and requests to receive payments from the Fund. This will satisfy any requirement that offset be initiated prior to expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. At such time as the debtor makes a claim for payments from the Fund, if at least a year has elapsed since the offset request was originally made, the debtor should be permitted to offer a satisfactory repayment plan in lieu of offset upon establishing that changed financial circumstances would render the offset unjust.
( d ) In accordance with procedures established by the Office of Personnel Management, agencies may request an offset from the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund prior to completion of due process procedures.
( e ) If the requesting agency collects part or all of the debt by other means before deductions are made or completed pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, the agency shall act promptly to modify or terminate its request for offset under paragraph (a).
YEAR AREA EIC EICSOU ROG

2008 PLACER COUNTY APCD 230-218-9000-0000 218-AUTO REFINISHING 0.18

estimated reduction (%)1 24.5%

emisison estimation after reduction (tpd) 0.14

Control Efficiency, CE 0.76

Rule Efficiency, RE2 1

Rule Penetration, RP3 0.8

Control Profile, CL, CL= (1-(1-CE)*RE*RP) 0.80

1

Reference: Sacramento Regional 8-hr Ozone Attainment Plan, Appendix C pp. C-98

2

default setting

3

default setting
§ 1990.112 Classification of potential carcinogens. The following criteria for identification, classification and regulation of potential occupational carcinogens will be applied, unless the Secretary considers evidence under the provisions of §§ 1990.143, 1990.144 and 1990.145 and determines that such evidence warrants an exception to these criteria. ( a ) *Category I Potential Carcinogens.* A substance shall be identified, classified, and regulated as a Category I Potential Carcinogen if, upon scientific evaluation, the Secretary determines that the substance meets the definition of a potential occupational carcinogen in ( 1 ) humans, or
( 2 ) in a single mammalian species in a long-term bioassay where the results are in concordance with some other scientifically evaluated evidence of a potential carcinogenic hazard, or
( 3 ) in a single mammalian species in an adequately conducted long-term bioassay, in appropriate circumstances where the Secretary determines the requirement for concordance is not necessary. Evidence of concordance is any of the following: positive results from independent testing in the same or other species, positive results in short-term tests, or induction of tumors at injection or implantation sites.
( b ) *Category II Potential Carcinogens.* A substance shall be identified, classified, and regulated as a Category II Potential Carcinogen if, upon scientific evaluation, the Secretary determines that: ( 1 ) The substance meets the criteria set forth in § 1990.112(a), but the evidence is found by the Secretary to be only “suggestive”; or
( 2 ) The substance meets the criteria set forth in § 1990.112(a) in a single mammalian species without evidence of concordance.
#### TRIESTE & EARLE, INC. v. UNITED STATES

[84 C. Cls. 84; 302 U. S. 696]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by Supreme Court October 11, 1937.
#### In the Matter of Robert Church, Appellant, v Carmen Cohen, Respondent.

[698 NYS2d 524]

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Warren, J.), dated August 24, 1998, which denied his petition to relocate with the' parties’ child to an area outside the geographical limitation established by the parties’ stipulation of settlement, which was incorporated but not merged into a judgment of divorce dated September 13, 1995.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In *Matter of Tropea v Tropea*(87 NY2d 727), the Court of Appeals held that “each relocation request must be considered on its own merits with due consideration of all the relevant facts and circumstances and with predominant emphasis being placed on what outcome is most likely to serve the best interests of the child” *(Matter of Tropea v Tropea, supra,*at 739). The Court of Appeals set forth a list of nonexclusive factors which it considered relevant to the ultimate determination *286
      *(Matter of Tropea v Tropea, supra,*at 740-741): “each parent’s reasons for seeking or opposing the move, the quality of the relationships between the child and the custodial and noncustodial parents, the impact of the move on the quantity and quality of the child’s future contact with the noncustodial parent, the degree to which the custodial parent’s and child’s life may be enhanced economically, emotionally and educationally by the move, and the feasibility of preserving the relationship between the noncustodial parent and child through suitable visitation arrangements”.

After weighing the appropriate factors as set forth in *Matter of Tropea v Tropea (supra),*the Family Court properly found that it was in the child’s best interests to deny the father’s request to relocate to Yardley, Pennsylvania with the child.

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Krausman, J. P., McGinity, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ David V. Singer

David V. Singer
    
    
    
    /s/ Rick D. Puckett

Rick D. PuckettPresident and Chief Executive Officer 
February 23, 2009
    
    
    
    Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer,
   Treasurer and Secretary
February 23, 2009
#### § 93.51 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes special air traffic rules for aircraft operating in the Anchorage, Alaska, Terminal Area.

[Doc. No. FAA-2002-13235, 68 FR 9795, Feb. 28, 2003]
Money4Gold Holdings, Inc


EXHIBIT 10.1

Money4Gold Holdings, Inc.

595 S. Federal Highway, Suite 600

Boca Raton, Florida 33432







September 30, 2009










Re:

Money4Gold / Settlement of Outstanding Debt







Dear Barry and Mike:




This letter agreement (the “Agreement”) documents our agreement with respect to the: (i) $500,000 loan from Barry Honig and GRQ Consultants, Inc. 401K (collectively, “GRQ”) to Money4Gold Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) to finance media purchases (the “Media Loan”), (ii) a $250,000 Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated as of March 4, 2009, as amended (the “Note”), and the Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated March 4, 2009 (the “Warrant”) held by GRQ, and (iii) Series B Preferred Stock held by Michael Brauser (the “Holder”). 

GRQ agrees to convert the principal balance of $500,000 plus any accrued interest owed as of September 30, 2009 under the Media Loan into shares of the Company’s common stock at an effective price per share of $0.0857.  As partial consideration for the conversion of the Media Loan, the Company agrees to permit the Holder to convert the Series B Preferred Stock as provided below. Additionally, GRQ cancels the Warrant. 

The Company agrees to pay the Note on or before 15 days from the date of this Agreement.  Doug Feirstein and Todd Oretsky agree to provide a loan to the Company on reasonable terms to be negotiated, if necessary, to pay the principal and any accrued interest owed under the Note in the event the Company does not pay the Note by October 15, 2009. 

The Holder acknowledges that he purchased 25,000 shares of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock from Leon Brauser.  The Holder agrees to convert all of the Series B Preferred Stock at an effective price per share of $0.15. Any unpaid dividends owed to the Holder for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 shall be payable in shares of the Company’s common stock at an effective price per share of $0.15.  

Please sign below evidencing your agreement to be bound by this Agreement.




		
	 
	Very truly yours,


	 
	 

	 
	/s/ Doug Feirstein


	 
	Doug Feirstein


	 
	Chief Executive Officer

















			
	AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

	 

	 
	                                                                          


	DOUG FEIRSTEIN

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ Doug Feirstein

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	TODD ORETSKY

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ Todd Oretsky

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	GRQ CONSULTANTS, INC. 401K

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	By:

	/s/ Barry Honig

	 

	 
	Barry Honig, Trustee

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	BARRY HONIG

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ Barry Honig

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	MICHAEL BRAUSER

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ Michael Brauser
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Vermont�s forest resources.**
 
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.163/45:
Item Number:0084-N-45 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000965572
 
March 29, 2018
Mark W. Roberts Senior Counsel UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGEN CY WASHI NGTON , D
.C
. 20460 

## OCT 2 6 2015

The Environmental Investigation Agency P.O. Box 53343 Washington, D .C. 20009 Dear Mr. Roberts: OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION

This letter is to acknowledge receipt ofthe petition submitted by the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) on October 6, 2015. The petition requests that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) list additional high-global warming potential hydrofluorocarbons as unacceptable or acceptable, subject to use restrictions, in various end-uses in the refrigeration and air conditioning, and fire suppression and explosion protection sectors under the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program where more benign alternatives are available. The petition specifically requests a three-tiered approach for changing the status ofthe substances. The petition was filed pursuant to section 612(d) ofthe Clean Air Act and 40 CFR 82.184(b)(3 ). EPA will review this petition. Ifyou have any additional questions , please call me at 202-343- 9729 or send an email to newberg.cindy@epa.gov.

Cindy Newberg, Branch Chief Alternatives and Emissions Reduction Branch Stratospheric Protection Division

Internet Address (URL) • http //www epa gov Recycled/Recyclable· Pnnted w1th Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer Process Chlonne Free Recycled Paper
#### § 2204.401 Filing and service of documents.

Any application for an award, or any accompanying documentation related to an application shall be filed and served on all parties to the proceeding in accordance with §§ 2200.7 and 2200.8 of this chapter, except as provided in § 2204.302(b) for confidential financial information.
#### NORTH ELEC MFG CO v SHELLEY

Ohio Appeals, 3rd Dist, Crawford Co

No 1185.

Decided July 10, 1929

Charles Gallinger, Bucyrus, for Mfg Co.

B. J. Cattey, Crestline, for Shelley.

HUGHES,-J.

The petition does not allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in that it contains no averment that the garnishee actually owed money to the judgment debtor. But, no objection was made to the introduction of evidence upon this ground at the trial, which was before the court, a jury having been waived.

The bill of exceptions shows that plaintiff had recovered a judgment of seventy-five dollars ,and costs against McBerty; that the defendant here had been duly served as garnishee. ,p-d as a matter of fact was indebted at that time to McBerty in the sum of four hundred dollars.

While the order to pay in, made by the justice, is in...... dollars, as above indicated, it was in fact an order to pay dollars and cents sufficient to discharge plaintiff’s judgment, provided, of course, the garnishee was indebted in that amount to the judgment debtor. The order made by the justice of the peace is not an adjudication between the plaintiff and the garnishee. It is but an assignment of the claim from the debtor to the creditor in attachment, to the amount of his judgment, and is notice to the garnishee that the claim that he owes. to the judgment debtor, has been assigned to the judgment creditor in an amount equal to his judgment. If he fails to pay into court or to the attaching creditor, the amount of his claim, he is liable to him in a civil action.

The proceedings had before the justice of the peace simply authorizes the plaintiff in attachment, to take the place of the defendant and sue in his own name if the order is not complied with.

Our interpretation of this order in this case is that it was a notice to the defendant here of plaintiff’s claim to the amount of the judgment and that McBerty’s credit had been assigned to the plaintiff. Ignoring the order, he was liable in this action.

The failure to object to *the introduction*of evidence, made it proper for the trial court to adjudicate the issues supported by evidence, regardless of the pleadings, and it is too late now for the defendant to object to the insufficiency of the petition.

Bacon v. Daniels, 37 OS. 279 at 281.

Before Judges Hughes, Justice & Crow.
§ 1984.108 Role of Federal agencies. ( a ) ( 1 ) The complainant and the respondent will be parties in every proceeding and must be served with copies of all documents in the case. At the Assistant Secretary's discretion, the Assistant Secretary may participate as a party or as amicus curiae at any time at any stage of the proceeding. This right to participate includes, but is not limited to, the right to petition for review of a decision of an ALJ, including a decision approving or rejecting a settlement agreement between the complainant and the respondent.
( 2 ) Parties must send copies of documents to OSHA and to the Associate Solicitor, Division of Fair Labor Standards, U.S. Department of Labor, only upon request of OSHA, or when OSHA is participating in the proceeding, or when service on OSHA and the Associate Solicitor is otherwise required by these rules.
( b ) The IRS, HHS, and EBSA, if interested in a proceeding, may participate as amicus curiae at any time in the proceeding, at those agencies' discretion. At the request of the interested federal agency, copies of all documents in a case must be sent to the federal agency, whether or not the agency is participating in the proceeding.