alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32001D0150 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001D0150

**2001/150/EC: Decision of the European Central Bank of 10 November 2000 on the publication of certain legal acts and instruments of the European Central Bank (ECB/2000/12) **

*
Official Journal L 055 , 24/02/2001 P. 0068 - 0068 *

Decision of the European Central Bank

of 10 November 2000

on the publication of certain legal acts and instruments of the European Central Bank

(ECB/2000/12)

(2001/150/EC)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank (hereinafter referred to as the "Statute") and in particular to Articles 10.4, 34.1 and 34.2 thereof,

After consulting the General Council of the European Central Bank (ECB),

Whereas:

(1) The ECB attaches great importance to enhancing the transparency of the regulatory framework of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB). In line with this approach, legal acts and instruments adopted by the ECB should be made available to the gernal public for public awareness even in the absence of an obligation to do so pursuant to the Treaty establishing the European Community or the Statute.

(2) Transparency can best be served through the publication of ECB acts and instruments in all official Community languages in the Official Journal of the European Communities,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Guideline ECB/1998/NP10 of 3 November 1998 on the implementation of Article 52 of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank (Annex I to this Decision), Guideline ECB/1999/NP11 of 22 April 1999 on the authorisation to issue national banknotes during the transitional period (Annex II to this Decision) and Guideline ECB/1998/NP28 of 22 December 1998 concerning the common rules and minimum standards to protect the confidentiality of the individual statistical information collected by the European Central Bank with the assistance of the national central banks (Annex III to this Decision); Decision ECB/1998/NP1 of 19 June 1998 on the appointment and on the duration of the mandate of the external auditor of the European Central Bank (Annex IV to this Decision); Decision ECB/1998/NP15 of 1 December 1998 concerning the performance by the European Central Bank of certain functions relating to medium-term financial assistance for Member States' balance of payments (Annex V to this Decision) and Recommendation ECB/1999/NP7 of 8 April 1999 on the accounting treatment of costs incurred in connection with the issue of banknotes (Annex VI to this Decision) are hereby published.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 10 November 2000.

The President of the ECB

Willem F. Duisenberg
§ 1984.102 Obligations and prohibited acts. ( a ) No employer may discharge or otherwise retaliate against, including, but not limited to, intimidating, threatening, restraining, coercing, blacklisting or disciplining, any employee with respect to the employee's compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because the employee (or an individual acting at the request of the employee), has engaged in any of the activities specified in paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of this section.
( b ) An employee is protected against retaliation because the employee (or an individual acting at the request of the employee) has: ( 1 ) Received a credit under section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, 26 U.S.C. 36B, or a cost-sharing reduction under the Affordable Care Act, or been determined by an Exchange to be eligible for advance payments of the premium tax credit (APTC) or for a cost-sharing reduction;
( 2 ) Provided, caused to be provided, or is about to provide or cause to be provided to the employer, the Federal Government, or the attorney general of a State information relating to any violation of, or any act or omission the employee reasonably believes to be a violation of, any provision of title I of the Affordable Care Act (or an amendment made by title I of the Affordable Care Act);
( 3 ) Testified or is about to testify in a proceeding concerning such violation;
( 4 ) Assisted or participated, or is about to assist or participate, in such a proceeding; or
( 5 ) Objected to, or refused to participate in, any activity, policy, practice, or assigned task that the employee (or other such person) reasonably believed to be in violation of any provision of title I of the Affordable Care Act (or amendment), or any order, rule, regulation, standard, or ban under title I of the Affordable Care Act (or amendment).
SERVED APRIL 7, 2010 'pRiAllON 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

THRESHOLD AIR CHARTER, INC. 

For fees and expenses under the 

Equal Access to Justice Act 

2010-EAJA-Ol 

FAA DOCKET No. CP10WP0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0195 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On February 27, 2010, counsel for Threshold Air Charter, Inc. ("Applicant") 

submitted an Application for Attorney's Fees and Costs ("Applicaton") under the Equal 

Access to Justice Act, 5 USC §504 ("EAJA"), and 14 C.F.R. §14.01 of the FAA's Rules 

implementing EAJA. By Order served March 29, 2010, the matter was assigned to the 

imdersigned. By letter dated March 31, 2010, the Applicant withdrew its Application, 

citing settlement. 

14 C.F.R. § 14.25 states: "The applicant and agency counsel may agree on a 

proposed settlement of the award before final action on the application,..." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal of Application having been read and 

considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Applicant's Withdrawal of Application be and is hereby granted; and 
2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED. 

Richard C. Goodwin ^ 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10WP0004 

(Equal Access to Justice Act) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Steven L. Graff, Applicant's Counsel 

Steven L. Graff, Inc. 

P.O. Box 892409 

Temecula, CA 92589-2409 

TEL: 951-303-6400 

FAX: 951-303-0723 

Lisa J. Toscano, Agency Counsel 

Office of the Regional Coimsel 

Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7100 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodvdn, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Room 2014, Washington, DC 

20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS LEGEND  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COYOTE NETWORK SYSTEMS, INC. AS OF AND FOR
THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                 1225
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          2688
<ALLOWANCES>                                           (186)
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      10129
<PP&E>                                                 5030
<DEPRECIATION>                                         (223)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        28807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 10788
<BONDS>                                                1534
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                            7395
<COMMON>                                              11167
<OTHER-SE>                                           (12505)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          28807
<SALES>                                                6756
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       6756
<CGS>                                                  5878
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          5878
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       9590
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     1885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (9590)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (9590)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        (5153)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (14743)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (1.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (1.63)



</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Subpart Z of Part 1910

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1910 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

#### § 1910.1013 beta-Propiolactone.

See § 1910.1003, *13 carcinogens.*

[61 FR 9245, Mar. 7, 1996]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Special Oversight Board for Department of Defense Investigations of Gulf War Chemical and Biological Incidents, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Board will conduct a two-day closed meeting to review the Mitre Report, a classified report dealing with how and when the intelligence community determined the type, number and location of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction during operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm. OSAGWI will also present a short classified briefing on the revised Khamisiyah plume.

# DATES:

May 22-23, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

1401 Wilson Boulevard, suite 401, Arlington, VA 22209 (Day 1); Old Executive Office Building, 17th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20504 (Day 2).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Contact Mr. David Edman, Special Oversight Board, 1401 Wilson Blvd, Suite 401, Arlington, VA 22209, phone (703) 696-9468, fax (703) 696-4062, or via Email at                         *Gulfsyn@osd.pentagon.mil.*                         Copies of the draft meeting agenda can be obtained by contacting Ms. Sandra Simpson at (703) 696-9464 or at the above fax number of above email.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Classified information will be discussed and reviewed throughout the two-day meeting. Therefore, the meeting is not open to the public. No government personnel other than the two briefing teams will be permitted to attend the meeting.

Dated: May 1, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.

[FR Doc. 00-12065 Filed 5-12-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
§ 1918.83 Stowed cargo; tiering and breaking down. ( a ) When necessary to protect personnel working in a hold, the employer shall secure or block stowed cargo that is likely to shift or roll.
( b ) In breaking down stowed cargo, precautions shall be taken to prevent remaining cargo from falling.
( c ) Employees trimming bulk cargo shall be checked in and out by the job boss. Before securing any reefer compartment, a check shall be made to ensure that no employee remains inside. Frequent checks shall be made to ensure the safety of any employee working alone in a tank or cargo compartment.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23

- 0194 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. EVAN DALE TWIFORD, Defendant and Appellant

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 6 , 2024 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 27 2024

02/27/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0194
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 98 (Friday, May 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31926-31927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12611]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AK-962-1410-HY]


Notice for Publication; F-19155-4 Alaska Native Claims Selection

    In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice 
is hereby given that a decision to issue conveyance under the 
provisions of Sec. 14(e) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 
December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1613(e), will be issued to Doyon, Limited. 
The lands involved are in the vicinity of Fort Yukon, Alaska.

Fairbanks Meridian, Alaska

T. 18 N., R. 14 E.,
    Secs. 29 and 32, those lands formerly within Native allotment F-
14713 Parcel B.

Containing approximately 40 acres.
    A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four 
(4) consecutive weeks, in the Fairbanks Daily News Miner. Copies of the 
decision may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the 
Bureau of Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99513-7599, (907) 271-5960.
    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected 
by the decision, an agency of the Federal government, or regional 
corporation, shall have until June 19, 2000 to file an appeal. However, 
parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days from the 
date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in the Bureau 
of Land Management at the address identified above, where the 
requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do not 
file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR Part 4, 
Subpart

[[Page 31927]]

E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.

Stephanie Clusiau,
Land Law Examiner, Branch of ANCSA Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 00-12611 Filed 5-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-U
March 24, 2015

Docket FAA-2001-8762

Docket Management Facility

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Exemption No. 10248: Request for Extension of Exemption

Dear Sir or Madam:

The Regional Airline Association (“RAA”), on behalf of its member airlines, petitions pursuant to 

Sections 11.61 and 11.63 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) for an extension of Exemption No. 10248 

at Docket No. FAA-2001-8762. This exemption is scheduled to expire on April 30, 2015.

Subject to certain conditions and limitations, Exemption No. 10248 provides relief from § 91.203 

of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) by permitting RAA member airlines to temporarily 

operate certain U.S.-registered aircraft in domestic airline operations without the airworthiness certificate or 

certificate of aircraft registration, or both, onboard the aircraft. 

The conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that formed the basis for 

granting the original exemption have not changed and granting the requested relief will not set 

precedent. For these reasons, RAA submits that a finding of good cause exists for waiving publication 

in the Federal Register. 

 

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. 

Respectfully submitted,

Stacey Bechdolt

Vice President, Safety & Operations

Regulatory Counsel

Regional Airline Association
2025 M Street, NW, Suite 800

Washington, DC 20036

202-367-1252

Bechdolt@raa.org
#### § 1949.2 Definitions.

Any term not defined herein shall have the same meaning as given it in the Act. As used in this subpart:

*Private sector students* means those students attending the Institute who are not employees of Federal, State, or local governments.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Jose Perez, Respondent.

[697 NYS2d 672]

—Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Demakos, J.) dated December 10, 1998, which granted those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress certain *243physical evidence and his statements to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the defendant had standing to challenge a search which was conducted pursuant to a warrant which designated “150-17 Liberty Avenue, Jamaica, New York, more specifically, a commercial premises with a sign in front reading, ‘Jamaica Auto Glass’ which has a fenced-in yard directly behind it where vehicle parts are stored” as the premises to be searched. The record shows that the defendant was the manager of “Jamaica Auto Glass,” and that he had access to the yard together with the agents of a second business entity located at an adjoining premises known as “Jamaica Auto Salvage”. Under these and other circumstances in the record, the defendant, as the manager of a commercial premises, had a reasonable expectation of privacy in those premises, and hence had standing to object to the search *(see generally, Mancusi v DeForte,*392 US 364; *see also, New York v Burger,*482 US 691; *cf., People v Norberg,*136 Misc 2d 550).

We also agree that the instant search was illegal, in that the decision to apply for the warrant which authorized this search had been prompted by information obtained during a prior search which, we find, was illegal. The prior search (a search for fireworks) was conducted in a two-story building, notwithstanding that the warrant authorizing the earlier search specified a one-story warehouse which the police officers knew or should have known was different from the building they actually searched. The cases relied upon by the People to justify this prior search *(see, e.g., People v Wallace,*238 AD2d 807) are clearly inapposite. Here, the police simply searched a building which they knew was not the one targeted in the warrant, and it was during this illegal search that a detective made an alleged plain-view observation which prompted the application for the second warrant *(see, People v DelRio,*220 AD2d 122, 131). For these reasons, the evidence seized during the course of the second search was properly suppressed.

Similarly, it is clear from the record that the statements made by the defendant were in response to police questioning prompted by the observations made during the initial illegal search. Since this evidence was derived from the illegal search, it was properly suppressed *(see, People v DelRio, supra; see also, Murray v United States,*487 US 533). Bracken, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.
§ 382.143 When must carriers complete training for their personnel? ( a ) As a U.S. carrier, you must meet the training requirements of § 382.141 by the following times. ( 1 ) Employees designated as CROs shall receive training concerning the requirements of this part and the duties of a CRO before assuming their duties under § 382.151 (see § 382.141(a)(7)). You must ensure that all employees performing the CRO function receive annual refresher training concerning their duties and the provisions of this regulation. The one-time training for CROs about the changes to Part 382 must take place by May 13, 2009. For employees who have already received CRO training, this training may be limited to changes from the previous version of Part 382.
( 2 ) The one-time training for existing employees about changes to Part 382 (see § 382.141(a)(8)) must take place for each such employee no later than the next scheduled recurrent training taking place after May 13, 2009 or within one year after May 13, 2009, whichever comes first.
( 3 ) For crewmembers subject to training requirements under 14 CFR Part 121 or 135 whose employment in any given position commences after May 13, 2009, before they assume their duties; and
( 4 ) For other personnel whose employment in any given position commences after May 13, 2009, within 60 days after the date on which they assume their duties.
( b ) As a foreign carrier that operates aircraft with 19 or more passenger seats, you must provide training meeting the requirements of § 382.141(a) for all personnel who deal with the traveling public in connection with flights that begin or end at a U.S. airport, as appropriate to the duties of each employee. You must ensure that personnel required to receive training complete the training by the following times: ( 1 ) Employees designated as CROs shall receive training in accordance with paragraph (a)(1) of this section, by May 13, 2009.
( 2 ) For crewmembers and other personnel who are employed on May 13, 2009, within one year after that date;
( 3 ) For crewmembers whose employment commences after May 13, 2010, before they assume their duties;
( 4 ) For other personnel whose employment in any given position commences after May 13, 2010, or within 60 days after the date on which they assume their duties; and
( 5 ) For crewmembers and other personnel whose employment in any given position commences after May 13, 2009, but before May 13, 2010, by May 13, 2010 or a date 60 days after the date of their employment, whichever is later.
[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2004-19482, 73 FR 27665, May 13, 2008, as amended at 74 FR 11472, Mar. 18, 2009]