alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Elgrande International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael F. Holloran, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Michael F. Holloran Michael F. Holloran Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer  April 11, 2007
Exhibit 10.13

                                   [FORM OF]

            TECHNICAL AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT

        THIS TECHNICAL AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT between
Kuhlman Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and ____________
(the "Employee"), is dated as of January 1, 1998.

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

        WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee, having entered into a Change of
Control Agreement dated as of February 20, 1996 (the "Agreement"), now desire to
amend the Agreement in accordance with the terms hereof;

        NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

        1. Section 4(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended as follows: Clause
(C) is deleted in its entirety. Clause (D) is renamed clause "(C)" and the
reference therein to "clauses (A), (B), (C) and (D) hereof" becomes a reference
to "clauses (A), (B) and (C) hereof".

        2. Except as amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect. This Amendment No. 1 shall be governed by, and construed in
accordance with, the laws of the State of Georgia. This Amendment No. 1 may be
executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of
which together will constitute the same instrument.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Employee have executed this
Amendment No. 1 as of the date first mentioned above.

KUHLMAN CORPORATION                       Approved:

By: _________________________             By: ___________________________
                                              George J. Michel, Jr.
                                              Chairman, Compensation Committee
                                              of the Board of Directors

THE EMPLOYEE:

_____________________________ (L.S.)
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 834 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 834

   To require annual testimony before Congress by the Securities and 
Exchange Commission, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, and the 
   Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, relating to efforts to 
              promote transparency in financial reporting.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 2007

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require annual testimony before Congress by the Securities and 
Exchange Commission, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, and the 
   Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, relating to efforts to 
              promote transparency in financial reporting.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Promoting Transparency in Financial 
Reporting Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) Transparent and clear financial reporting is integral 
        to the continued growth and strength of our capital markets and 
        the confidence of investors.
            (2) The increasing detail and volume of accounting, 
        auditing, and reporting guidance pose a major challenge.
            (3) The complexity of accounting and auditing standards in 
        the United States has added to the costs and effort involved in 
        financial reporting.

SEC. 3. ANNUAL TESTIMONY ON REDUCING COMPLEXITY IN FINANCIAL REPORTING.

    The Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Accounting 
Standards Board, and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 
shall annually provide oral testimony by their respective chairpersons, 
or a designee thereof, beginning in 2007, and for 5 years thereafter, 
to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate 
and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives 
on their efforts to reduce the complexity in financial reporting, so 
that investors are provided with more accurate and clear financial 
information. That testimony shall address--
            (1) complex and outdated accounting standards;
            (2) improving the understandability, consistency, and 
        overall usability of the existing accounting and auditing 
        literature;
            (3) developing principles-based accounting standards;
            (4) encouraging the use and acceptance of interactive data; 
        and
            (5) promoting disclosures in ``plain English''.
                                 <all>
```
#### ATLANTIC COAST LINE RY. CO. v. BENYACKER.

(Decided December 19, 1916.)

Appeal from Montgomery City Court.

Heard before Hon. Gaston Gunter.

John R. Tyson, for appellant.

Weil, Stakely & Vardaman, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed by appellant.
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/multilanguage/Vietname/vietnamese.htm**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/multilanguage/Vietname/vietnamese.htm**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### § 1650.201 Purpose.

This subpart establishes procedures for EEOC to refer past-due legally enforceable debts to the Department of the Treasury (Treasury) for offset against the income tax refunds of persons owing debts to EEOC pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3720A and 31 CFR 285.2. The general standards and procedures governing the collection, compromise, termination, and referral to the Department of Justice of claims for money and property that are prescribed in the regulations issued jointly by the Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney General of the United States, the Federal Claims Collection Standards (31 CFR parts 900-904), apply to the administrative collection activities of the EEOC.
§ 1986.114 District court jurisdiction of retaliation complaints under SPA. ( a ) If there is no final order of the Secretary, 210 days have passed since the filing of the complaint, and there is no showing that there has been delay due to the bad faith of the complainant, the complainant may bring an action at law or equity for *de novo* review in the appropriate district court of the United States, which will have jurisdiction over such an action without regard to the amount in controversy. The action shall, at the request of either party to such action, be tried by the court with a jury.
( b ) Within seven days after filing a complaint in federal court, a complainant must file with the Assistant Secretary, the ALJ, or the ARB, depending on where the proceeding is pending, a copy of the file-stamped complaint. A copy of the complaint also must be served on the OSHA official who issued the findings and/or preliminary order, the Assistant Secretary, and the Associate Solicitor, Division of Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Labor.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                       EXHIBIT 8

                   SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF AMDOCS LIMITED

<Table>
<Caption>
                                        JURISDICTION OF
                                       INCORPORATION OR
LIST OF THE SUBSIDIARIES                 ORGANIZATION                     BUSINESS NAME
------------------------               ----------------                   -------------
<S>                             <C>                              <C>
Amdocs Astrum Limited           Ireland                          Amdocs Astrum Limited
Amdocs BCS, Inc.                State of California              Amdocs BCS, Inc.
Amdocs BCS Vision, Inc.         State of North Carolina          Amdocs BCS Vision, Inc.
Amdocs Canadian Managed         Canada                           Amdocs Canadian Managed
  Services, Inc.                                                 Services Inc.
Amdocs Champaign, Inc.          State of Delaware                Amdocs Champaign, Inc.
Amdocs (Denmark) ApS            Denmark                          Amdocs (Denmark) ApS
Amdocs Development Centre       India                            Amdocs Development Centre
  India Private Limited                                          India Private Limited
Amdocs Development Limited      Republic of Cyprus               Amdocs Development Limited
Amdocs Holdings ULC             Canada                           Amdocs Holdings ULC
Amdocs, Inc.                    State of Delaware                Amdocs, Inc.
Amdocs International GmbH       Switzerland                      Amdocs International GmbH
Amdocs (Israel) Limited         Israel                           Amdocs (Israel) Limited
Amdocs Management Limited       United Kingdom                   Amdocs Management Limited
Amdocs Software Solutions Kft   Hungary                          Amdocs Software Solutions
                                                                 Limited Liability Company
Amdocs Software Systems Ltd.    Ireland                          Amdocs Software Systems Ltd.
Amdocs Stamford, Inc.           State of Delaware                Amdocs Stamford, Inc.
Amdocs (UK) Limited             United Kingdom                   Amdocs (UK) Limited
Cramer Systems Group Limited    United Kingdom                   Cramer Systems Group Limited
European Software Marketing     Island of Guernsey, Channel      European Software Marketing
  Ltd.                          Islands                          Ltd.
Longshine Information           British Virgin Islands           Longshine Information
  Technology Co. Ltd.                                            Technology Co. Ltd.
Sypress, Inc.                   State of Delaware                Sypress, Inc.
Qpass, Inc.                     State of Washington              Amdocs Qpass Inc.
</Table>
§ 1915.33 Chemical paint and preservative removers. ( a ) Employees shall be protected against skin contact during the handling and application of chemical paint and preservative removers and shall be protected against eye injury by goggles or face shields in accordance with the requirements of subpart I of this part.
( b ) When using flammable paint and preservative removers, precautions shall be taken in accordance with the requirements of § 1915.36.
( c ) When using chemical paint and preservative removers which contain volatile and toxic solvents, such as benzol, acetone and amyl acetate, the provisions of § 1915.32 shall be applicable.
( d ) When using paint and rust removers containing strong acids or alkalies, employees shall be protected by suitable face shields to prevent chemical burns on the face and neck.
( e ) When steam guns are used, all employees working within range of the blast shall be protected by suitable face shields. Metal parts of the steam gun itself shall be insulated to protect the operator against heat burns.
[47 FR 16986, Apr. 20, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 26351, May 24, 1996]
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted), I, Susan Santage, Chief Executive
Officer and  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
that, to the best of his or her knowledge:





1.
The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,
2009, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "PERIODIC
REPORT") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company
for the period covered by the Periodic Report.





Dated:
February 12, 2010








S/ Susan
Santage


Susan
Santage


CEO &
CFO





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Yummies, Inc. and will be retained by Yummies, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request





THIS
CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SS. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED "FILED" BY THE COMPANY FOR PURPOSES OF
SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6837
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARY EDITH SAUNDERS MUSE, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, District Judge. (CR-89-21-5-1) Submitted: February 11, 1997 Decided: March 5, 1997 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary Edith Saunders Muse, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Michelle Lecocq, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying her Motion to Rescind Order Amending Sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Muse , No. CR-89-21-5-1 (S.D.W. Va. May 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### PRUDENTIAL SAVINGS BANK v. LOONEY.

(Decided June 1, 1916.)

Appeal from Calhoun Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Hugh D. Merrill.

C. B. Powell, for appellant. Perdue & Cox, and Willard Drake, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed for want of assignment of error.
No. 17,619.

#### Myers *v.*City of Jeffersonville et al.

Appellate *Procedure.—Dismissal.—Failure to File*Brief.—An appeal will be dismissed by the Supreme Court, where the appellant has expressly declined to file a brief, in the absence of a request by the appellee that the cause be passed upon by the court, under rule 20, of the court.

From the Clark Circuit Court.

*J. E. Taggart,*for appellant.

*L. A. Douglass,*for appellees.

McCabe, J.

This was a suit brought by the appellant against the appellees, mayor and common council of said city, to enjoin the issuing and selling certain bonds of said city. The circuit court overruled a demurrer to an affirmative answer by the appellees, and the plaintiff, appellant, refusing to plead further, and standing by his demurrer, the defeixdants, appellees, had judgment that appellant take nothing by his suit.

The appellant has assigned that ruling as error. He has filed no brief, and has expressly declined to do *568so by filing a paper in which he says, *‘ ‘*The appellant hereby waives the filing of a brief in the above case, and requests that the case may be decided upon the appellees’ brief.” The appellees alone have filed a brief, but they have filed no written request that the cause be passed upon by this court. Rule 20 of this court requires the appellant to file a brief within a certain specified time after the cause is submitted, in default of which the clerk is required to enter an order dismissing the appeal, unless the appellees shall have filed with the clerk a written request that the cause be passed upon by the court. As before observed, this has not been done.

Filed May 28, 1895;

petition for rehearing overruled April 16, 1896.

It has often been decided by this court that the failure by the appellant to brief an error assigned is a waiver of such error.

The express declination of the appellant to file a brief is a waiver of the error he has assigned. The appellees have no legal right in the absence of the rule mentioned to require this court to decide the error assigned by the appellant, because the appellees have got all they asked for in the trial court. But they could have procured the decision of the question presented by the assignment of error by complying with the rule.

The error assigned having been waived, the appeal is dismissed.
#### § 101.7 Settlements.

Before any complaint is issued or other formal action taken, the Regional Director affords an opportunity to all parties for the submission and consideration of facts, argument, offers of settlement, or proposals of adjustment, except where time, the nature of the proceeding, and the public interest do not permit. Normally prehearing conferences are held, the principal purpose of which is to discuss and explore such submissions and proposals of adjustment. The Regional Office provides Board-prepared forms for such settlment agreements, as well as printed notices for posting by the respondent. These agreements, which are subject to the approval of the Regional Director, provide for an appeal to the General Counsel, as described in § 101.6, by a complainant who will not join in a settlement or adjustment deemed adequate by the Regional Director. Proof of compliance is obtained by the Regional Director before the case is closed. If the respondent fails to perform the obligations under the informal agreement, the Regional Director may determine to institute formal proceedings.
§ 1917.25 Fumigants, pesticides, insecticides and hazardous preservatives (see also § 1917.2 Hazardous cargo, material, substance or atmosphere). ( a ) At any time that the concentration in any space reaches the level specified as hazardous by the fumigant manufacturer or by Table Z-1 of 29 CFR 1910.1000, whichever is lower, all employees shall be removed from the space and shall not be permitted to re-enter until such time as tests demonstrate that the atmosphere is safe.
( b ) Tests to determine the atmospheric concentration of chemicals used to treat cargo shall be: ( 1 ) Appropriate for the hazard involved;
( 2 ) Conducted by designated persons; and
( 3 ) Performed at the intervals necessary to ensure that employee exposure does not exceed the permissible exposure limit for the chemical involved.
( c ) Results of any tests shall be available for at least 30 days. Such records may be entered on any retrievable medium, and shall be available for inspection.
( d ) Chemicals shall only be applied to cargoes by designated persons.
( e ) Only designated persons shall enter hazardous atmospheres, in which case the following provisions apply. ( 1 ) Persons entering a space containing a hazardous atmosphere shall be protected by respiratory and emergency protective equipment meeting the requirements of subpart E of this part; and
( 2 ) Persons entering a space containing a hazardous atmosphere shall be instructed in the nature of the hazard, precautions to be taken, and the use of protective and emergency equipment. Standby observers, similarly equipped and instructed, shall continuously monitor the activity of employees within such a space.
( f ) Signs shall be clearly posted where fumigants, pesticides or hazardous preservatives have created a hazardous atmosphere. These signs shall note the danger, identify specific chemical hazards, and give appropriate information and precautions, including instructions for the emergency treatment of employees affected by any chemical in use.
( g ) In the case of containerized shipments of fumigated tobacco, the contents of the container shall be aerated by opening the container doors for a period of 48 hours after the completion of fumigation and prior to loading. When tobacco is within shipping cases having polyethylene or similar bag liners, the aeration period shall be 72 hours. The employer shall obtain a written warranty from the fumigation facility stating that the appropriate aeration period has been met.
[48 FR 30909, July 5, 1983, as amended at 49 FR 28551, July 13, 1984; 61 FR 5509, Feb. 13, 1996; 62 FR 40197, July 25, 1997]
#### James Counias, as Administrator of the Estate of Michael Counias, Appellant, *v.*Sara C. Thomas Respondent, Impleaded with Others.

(Submitted October 19, 1936;

decided October 23, 1936.)

*598
      *Herman I. Lurie*for motion.

No one opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, without costs.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Public  Company  Accounting  Reform  and
Investor  Protection  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.  1350,  as adopted),  I, Dianne
Hatton-Ward, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

     1. The Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31,  2004,  and to which this  Certification  is attached  as Exhibit  99.1 (the
"PERIODIC  REPORT")  fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  of the Company at the end of the
period  covered by the Periodic  Report and results of operations of the Company
for the period covered by the Periodic Report.

Dated: May 3, 2004


S/ Dianne Hatton-Ward
---------------------
Dianne Hatton-Ward
CEO & CFO

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Yummies, Inc. and will be retained by Yummies, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request

THIS  CERTIFICATION   ACCOMPANIES  THIS  REPORT  PURSUANT  TO  SS.  906  OF  THE
SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED  "FILED" BY THE  COMPANY FOR
PURPOSES OF SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 17, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 17, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15A1294. CHRISTOPHER MCKINNEY v. BEST BUY CO., INC.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.