alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 93 (Friday, May 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11929]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-1928-000]


Western New York Wind Corp; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 8, 2000.
    Western New York Wind Corp. (WNYWC) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which WNYWC will engage in wholesale electric power and 
energy transactions as a marketer. WNYWC also requested waiver of 
various Commission regulations. In particular, WNYWC requested that the 
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by WNYWC.
    On May 4, 2000, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by WNYWC should file a motion to intervene 
or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 
and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, WNYWC is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purpose of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of WNYWC's issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is June 5, 2000.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11929 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### BURDINE C. ANDERSON ET AL., TRUSTEES v. UNITED STATES

[83 C. Cls. 561; 302 U. S. 695]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by Supreme Court October 11, 1937.
Editorial Note on Part 1615
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1615 appear at 73 FR 39866, July 11, 2008.

§ 1615.160 Communications. ( a ) The Commission shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The Commission shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford an individual with disabilities an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the Commission. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the Commission shall give primary consideration to the requests of the individual with disabilities.
( ii ) The Commission need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the Commission communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf persons (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used.
( b ) The Commission shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The Commission shall provide signs at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the Commission to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where Commission personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the Commission has the burden of proving that compliance with § 1615.160 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the Chair of the Commission after considering all Commission resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity, and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the Commission shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
[54 FR 22749, May 26, 1989, as amended at 73 FR 39866, July 11, 2008]
#### M. P. Moller, Inc., Appellant, *v.*Temple Israel of Washington Heights, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Submitted April 26, 1937;

decided April 30, 1937.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 273 N. Y. 571.)
Indented Bill of Materials

V PCB - Batt Fan

Level Symbol Name Number Qty Material Piece Cost Weight Piece Cost 

(Total)

V PCB - Batt Fan-Functional V PCB - Batt 1 $8.11 0.0250 lb

Test Fan-Functional 

Test

1 V PCB - Batt Fan-Depannel V PCB - Batt 1 $8.11 0.0250 lb

Fan-Depannel

2 V PCB - Batt Fan-Conformal V PCB - Batt 1 $8.11 0.0250 lb

Coat Fan-Conformal 

Coat

3 V PCB - Batt Fan-Thru Hole V PCB - Batt 1 $7.81 0.0250 lb

Fan-Thru Hole

4 V PCB - Batt Fan-SMT - Bare V PCB - Batt 1 $0.34 0.0250 lb

Board Fan-SMT

4 BOTTOM SIDE - SURFACE BOTTOM SIDE - 1 $4.23 0.0000 lb

MOUNT SURFACE 

MOUNT

5 IC - Voltage Regulator UA78L05ACDRE 4-ND 1 Commodity Price $1.17 0.0000 lb

5 IC - Transciever SN65MLVD200D 1 Commodity Price $1.72 0.0000 lb

5 Transistor - Surface Mount Transistor - Surface Mount BC848C-TPMSCT-ND BC848C-TPMSCT-ND 7 Commodity Price Commodity Price $0.07 0.0000 lb 0.0000 lb

5 Zener Diode - Surface Mount DL5244B-TPMSCT-ND 1 Commodity Price $0.07 0.0000 lb

5 IC IC fan control bpard 1 Commodity Price $0.50 0.0000 lb

5 Capacitors Capacitors-1 3 Commodity Price $0.01 0.0000 lb

5 Resistors Resistors-1 27 Commodity Price $0.01 0.0000 lb

4 TOP SIDE - SURFACE MOUNT 1 $3.23 0.0000 lb

5 MOSFETs - Surface Mount SP8M8TBCT-ND 2 Commodity Price $0.32 0.0000 lb

5 IC PIC16F684 1 Commodity Price $0.75 0.0000 lb

5 Fuse - Surface Mount F2933CT-ND 1 Commodity Price $0.86 0.0000 lb

5 Diode - Schottky - Surface Mount B340A-FDITR-ND 3 Commodity Price $0.19 0.0000 lb

5 Transistor - Surface Mount BC848C-TPMSCT-ND 1 Commodity Price $0.07 0.0000 lb

5 Zener Diode - Surface Mount DL5244B-TPMSCT-ND 1 Commodity Price $0.07 0.0000 lb

5 Diode - Schottky - Surface Mount SS3P3-E3/84AGICT-ND 1 Commodity Price $0.14 0.0000 lb

5 Capacitor - Surface Mount P930-ND 1 Commodity Price $0.03 0.0000 lb

5 Capacitors Capacitors-1 5 Commodity Price $0.01 0.0000 lb

5 Resistors Resistors-1 7 Commodity Price $0.01 0.0000 lb

3 4 pin connector 4 pin connector 1 Commodity Price $0.30 0.0000 lb

Assembly Totals Report Totals Preassembled Totals

Analyzed Subs: 6 Piece Cost (Total): Analyzed Subs: 0

Unanalyzed Subs: 0 Unanalyzed Subs: 0

Weight (Total): 0.0250 lb

Parts: 66 Parts: 0
Fasteners: 0 Fasteners: 0

Parts+Unanalyzed: 66 Parts+Unanalyzed: 0

Design Profit ®

Page 2 of 2

Copyright 2005© Munro & Associates, Inc.
Weight 

(Total)

$8.11 0.0250 lb

# 0.0250 lb

$8.11 0.0250 lb

$7.81 0.0250 lb

$0.34 0.0250 lb

$4.23 0.0000 lb

$1.17 0.0000 lb

$1.72 0.0000 lb

$0.48 0.0000 lb

$0.07 0.0000 lb

$0.50 0.0000 lb

$0.03 0.0000 lb

$0.27 0.0000 lb

$3.23 0.0000 lb

$0.63 0.0000 lb

$0.75 0.0000 lb

$0.86 0.0000 lb

$0.57 0.0000 lb

$0.07 0.0000 lb

$0.07 0.0000 lb

$0.14 0.0000 lb

$0.03 0.0000 lb

$0.05 0.0000 lb

$0.07 0.0000 lb

$0.30 0.0000 lb
# EUR-Lex - 32000D0496 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000D0496

**2000/496/EC: Commission Decision of 18 July 2000 amending Decision 97/467/EC on drawing up provisional lists of third country establishments from which the Member States authorise imports of rabbit meat and farmed game meat (notified under document number C(2000) 1997) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 200 , 08/08/2000 P. 0039 - 0040 *

Commission Decision

of 18 July 2000

amending Decision 97/467/EC on drawing up provisional lists of third country establishments from which the Member States authorise imports of rabbit meat and farmed game meat

(notified under document number C(2000) 1997)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2000/496/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 95/408/EC of 22 June 1995 on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States are authorised to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs(1), as last amended by Council Decision 98/603/EC(2), and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Provisional lists of establishments producing rabbit meat and farmed game meat have been drawn up by Commission Decision 97/467/EC(3), as last amended by Decision 2000/329/EC(4).

(2) Slovenia has sent a list of establishments producing rabbit meat and farmed game meat and for which the responsible authorities certify that the establishment is in accordance with Community rules.

(3) A provisional list of establishments producing rabbit meat and farmed game meat can thus be drawn up for Slovenia.

(4) Decision 97/467/EC should be amended accordingly.

(5) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The text of the Annex to this Decision is added to the Annex of Decision 97/467/EC.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 July 2000.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 243, 11.10.1995, p. 17.

(2) OJ L 289, 28.10.1998, p. 36.

(3) OJ L 199, 26.7.1997, p. 57.

(4) OJ L 114, 13.5.2000, p. 35.

ANNEX

"País: ESLOVENIA/Land: SLOVENIEN/Land: SLOWENIEN/Χώρα: ΣΛΟΒΕΝΙΑ/Country: SLOVENIA/Pays: SLOVÉNIE/Paese: SLOVENIA/Land: SLOVENIË/País: ESLOVÉNIA/Maa: SLOVENIA/Land: SLOVENIEN

>TABLE>"
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-4036

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LINDELL ROY HUTCHINSON, a/k/a Star, a/k/a

Starsky,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,

Senior District Judge. (4:03-cr-00015-HCM)

Submitted: September 7, 2007 Decided: September 19, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jennifer T. Stanton, J.T. STANTON, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for

Appellant. Chuck Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Richard Cooke,

Howard J. Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorneys, Newport

News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the

court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Lindell Roy Hutchinson seeks to appeal his 168-month

sentence following his guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute and

to possess cocaine with the intent to distribute. The government

has moved to dismiss the appeal. In criminal cases, the defendant

must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of

judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion,

upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district

court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice

of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759

F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985).

The district court entered judgment on June 21, 2005.

The notice of appeal was filed on December 21, 2005.* Because

Hutchinson failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an

extension of the appeal period, we grant the government’s motion to

dismiss and dismiss the appeal. United States v. Robinson, 361

U.S. 220, 224 (1960) (holding that timely filing of notice of

appeal is “mandatory and jurisdictional”). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
- 3 -

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[No. 44463-8-I.

Division One.

December 23, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Robert Lee Parker, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-1-07511-2, Sharon S. Armstrong and Patricia H. Aitken, JJ., entered March 16, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Schindler, J., concurred in by Becker, C.J., and Ellington, J.
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 171/1 li

| | ISSN 1725-5228 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 171 |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Tom 471 lipca 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5228

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 171

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Tom 471 lipca 2004

---

| Powiadomienie nr | Spis treśći | Strona |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Informacja |
| | Komisja |
| 2004/C 171/1 | Kursy walutowe euro | 1 |

Powiadomienie nr

Spis treśći

Strona

I   Informacja

Komisja

2004/C 171/1

Kursy walutowe euro

1

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

I Informacja

Komisja

| 1.7.2004 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | C 171/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2004

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

C 171/1

---

Kursy walutowe euro (1)

30 czerwca 2004

(2004/C 171/01)

1 euro=

| | Waluta | Kurs wymiany |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | Dolar amerykański | 1,2155 |
| JPY | Jen | 132,40 |
| DKK | Korona duńska | 7,4326 |
| GBP | Funt szterling | 0,67075 |
| SEK | Korona szwedzka | 9,1451 |
| CHF | Frank szwajcarski | 1,5242 |
| ISK | Korona islandzka | 88,33 |
| NOK | Korona norweska | 8,4365 |
| BGN | Lew | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Funt cypryjski | 0,58150 |
| CZK | Korona czeska | 31,755 |
| EEK | Korona estońska | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Forint węgierski | 251,60 |
| LTL | Lit litewski | 3,4529 |
| LVL | Łat łotewski | 0,6570 |
| MTL | Lir maltański | 0,4263 |
| PLN | Złoty polski | 4,5236 |
| ROL | Lej rumuński | 40 626 |
| SIT | Tolar słoweński | 239,9900 |
| SKK | Korona słowacka | 39,875 |
| TRL | Lir turecki | 1 805 300 |
| AUD | Dolar australijski | 1,7554 |
| CAD | Dolar kanadyjski | 1,6343 |
| HKD | Dolar hong kong | 9,4803 |
| NZD | Dolar nowozelandzki | 1,9210 |
| SGD | Dolar singapurski | 2,0901 |
| KRW | Won | 1 404,45 |
| ZAR | Rand | 7,6177 |

Waluta

Kurs wymiany

USD

Dolar amerykański

1,2155

JPY

Jen

132,40

DKK

Korona duńska

7,4326

GBP

Funt szterling

0,67075

SEK

Korona szwedzka

9,1451

CHF

Frank szwajcarski

1,5242

ISK

Korona islandzka

88,33

NOK

Korona norweska

8,4365

BGN

Lew

1,9559

CYP

Funt cypryjski

0,58150

CZK

Korona czeska

31,755

EEK

Korona estońska

15,6466

HUF

Forint węgierski

251,60

LTL

Lit litewski

3,4529

LVL

Łat łotewski

0,6570

MTL

Lir maltański

0,4263

PLN

Złoty polski

4,5236

ROL

Lej rumuński

40 626

SIT

Tolar słoweński

239,9900

SKK

Korona słowacka

39,875

TRL

Lir turecki

1 805 300

AUD

Dolar australijski

1,7554

CAD

Dolar kanadyjski

1,6343

HKD

Dolar hong kong

9,4803

NZD

Dolar nowozelandzki

1,9210

SGD

Dolar singapurski

2,0901

KRW

Won

1 404,45

ZAR

Rand

7,6177

---

(1)

Źródło: referencyjny kurs wymiany walut opublikowany przez ECB.

---
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.52 Occupational noise exposure. ( a ) Protection against the effects of noise exposure shall be provided when the sound levels exceed those shown in Table D-2 of this section when measured on the A-scale of a standard sound level meter at slow response.
( b ) When employees are subjected to sound levels exceeding those listed in Table D-2 of this section, feasible administrative or engineering controls shall be utilized. If such controls fail to reduce sound levels within the levels of the table, personal protective equipment as required in subpart E, shall be provided and used to reduce sound levels within the levels of the table.
( c ) If the variations in noise level involve maxima at intervals of 1 second or less, it is to be considered continuous.
( d ) ( 1 ) In all cases where the sound levels exceed the values shown herein, a continuing, effective hearing conservation program shall be administered. Table D-2—Permissible Noise Exposures
Duration per day, hours
Sound level dBA slow response 8
90 6
92 4
95 3
97 2
100 11/2
102 1
105 1/2
110 1/4 or less
115
( 2 ) ( i ) When the daily noise exposure is composed of two or more periods of noise exposure of different levels, their combined effect should be considered, rather than the individual effect of each. Exposure to different levels for various periods of time shall be computed according to the formula set forth in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this section.
( ii ) F e = (*T* *1*/*L* *1*) + (*T* *2*/*L* *2*) + · · · + (*T* *n*/*L* *n*) Where: *F* e = The equivalent noise exposure factor. *T* = The period of noise exposure at any essentially constant level. *L* = The duration of the permissible noise exposure at the constant level (from Table D-2).
If the value of *F* e exceeds unity (1) the exposure exceeds permissible levels.
( iii ) A sample computation showing an application of the formula in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this section is as follows. An employee is exposed at these levels for these periods: 110 db A
1 ⁄ 4 hour. 100 db A
1 ⁄ 2 hour. 90 db A 11 ⁄ 2 hours. *F* e = (1 ⁄ 4/
1 ⁄ 2) + (1 ⁄ 2/2) + (11 ⁄ 2/8) *F* e = 0.500 + 0.25 + 0.188 *F* e = 0.938
Since the value of *F* e does not exceed unity, the exposure is within permissible limits.
( e ) Exposure to impulsive or impact noise should not exceed 140 dB peak sound pressure level.
§ 1910.135 Head protection. ( a ) *General requirements.* ( 1 ) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee wears a protective helmet when working in areas where there is a potential for injury to the head from falling objects.
( 2 ) The employer shall ensure that a protective helmet designed to reduce electrical shock hazard is worn by each such affected employee when near exposed electrical conductors which could contact the head.
( b ) *Criteria for head protection.* ( 1 ) Head protection must comply with any of the following consensus standards: ( i ) American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Z89.1-2009, “American National Standard for Industrial Head Protection,” incorporated by reference in § 1910.6;
( ii ) American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Z89.1-2003, “American National Standard for Industrial Head Protection,” incorporated by reference in § 1910.6; or
( iii ) American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Z89.1-1997, “American National Standard for Personnel Protection—Protective Headwear for Industrial Workers—Requirements,” incorporated by reference in § 1910.6.
( 2 ) Head protection devices that the employer demonstrates are at least as effective as head protection devices that are constructed in accordance with one of the above consensus standards will be deemed to be in compliance with the requirements of this section.
[59 FR 16362, Apr. 6, 1994, as amended at 61 FR 9238, Mar. 7, 1996; 61 FR 19548, May 2, 1996; 74 FR 46356, Sept. 9, 2009; 77 FR 37598, June 22, 2012]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6062

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHARLES ALGERNON BOOMER, III,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:19-cr-00191-RAJ-RJK-1)

Submitted: March 16, 2021 Decided: March 19, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Algernon Boomer, III, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Algernon Boomer, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion 

for compassionate release, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the 

First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

order. See United States v. Boomer, No. 2:19-cr-00191-RAJ-RJK-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 16, 

2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 21, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1704

Lower Tribunal No. F17-21478B

________________

Richard Perez-Mora,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mark 

Blumstein, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger, 

Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Brian H. Zack, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE, and LINDSEY, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed.