alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1919.18 Grace periods. Grace periods allowed in connection with the requirements of this subpart are as follows: ( a ) Annual or six-month requirements—by the end of the voyage during which they become due;
( b ) Quinquennial requirements—within six months after the date when due;
( c ) Grace periods shall not be deemed to extend subsequent due dates.
[39 FR 22096, June 19, 1974, as amended at 76 FR 33610, June 8, 2011]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1: Certification of Chief Executive Officer regarding Form 10-K for
year 2004 pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Specialty Trust, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Nello Gonfiantini III, Chairman of the Board and President of the Company
certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This Certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the
knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose. /s/ Nello Gonfiantini III
    
    Dated this 29th day of March 2005Name:
    
    Nello Gonfiantini IIITitle:
    
    Chairman of the Board and President
 100
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       4,164,587
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,114,465
<ALLOWANCES>                                   185,000
<INVENTORY>                                 18,588,044
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,003,813
<PP&E>                                      14,605,267
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,559,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,049,537
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,411,097
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       494,898
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,371,542
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,049,537
<SALES>                                     93,110,361
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            93,137,710
<CGS>                                       55,463,255
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               84,043,294
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             358,637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,735,779
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,494,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,241,479
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,241,479
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06


</TABLE>
§ 1912a.8 Contents of notice. ( a ) Notices of meetings shall describe fully or summarize adequately the agenda.
( b ) The notice shall announce that the meeting is open to the public.
( c ) The notice shall indicate that interested persons have an opportunity to file statements in written form with the Committee. The notice shall specify when the statements are to be filed with the Committee.
( d ) In the discretion of the Chairman of the meeting, oral statements may be made before the Committee by interested persons after taking into consideration the number of persons in attendance, the nature and extent of their proposed individual participation, and the time, resources, and facilities available to the Committee. As a general policy, time for such presentations will be made available only at subcommittee meetings. The time for a meeting of the full committee does not normally permit the reception of such presentations without substantially intruding upon the frequently limited time that the members may be able to devote to the meeting. The person calling the meeting may provide in the notice of the meeting that summaries of any proposed oral presentations be filed in advance of the meeting.
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 57 FR 31451, July 16, 1992.

§ 20.27 Cooperation with other DOL agencies and Federal agencies. ( a ) Appropriate use should be made of the cooperative efforts of other DOL agencies and Federal agencies in effecting collection by administrative offset. Generally, agencies should comply with requests from other agencies to initiate administrative offset to collect debts owed to the United States, unless the requesting agency has not complied with the applicable regulations or the request would otherwise be contrary to law or the best interests of the United States.
( b ) Unless otherwise prohibited by law, a DOL agency may request that monies due and payable to a debtor by another DOL agency or a Federal agency outside the Department be administratively offset in order to collect debts owed the creditor DOL agency by the debtor. In requesting an administrative offset, the creditor DOL agency must provide the DOL agency or other Federal agency holding funds of the debtor with written certification stating ( 1 ) That the debtor owes the creditor agency a debt (including the amount of debt); and
( 2 ) That the creditor agency has complied with the applicable Federal Claims Collection Standards, including any hearing or review.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Amos Wagoner, Respondent, against Brown Manufacturing Company et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

Argued May 20,1937;

decided June 8, 1937.

*594
      *Raymond F. Nichols*and *Warren C. Tucker*for appellants.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Roy Wiedersum*of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### General Accounting Office

# AGENCY:

General Accounting Office.

# ACTION:

 Notice of meeting on June 8 and 9, 2000.

*Board Action:*                     Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules of Procedure, as amended in October 1999, notice is hereby given that the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) will meet on Thursday, June 8 from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., and Friday, June 9, 2000 from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. in room 7C13, the Elmer Staats Briefing Room, 441 G St. NW, Washington, DC.                

The purpose of the meeting is to:

Review a draft exposure draft on Stewardship Responsibilities,

Discuss Stewardship PP&E and review a draft exposure draft,

Discuss National Defense PP&E, and

Discuss other topics as necessary.

A Steering Committee meeting of the Board's Principal Board members will be held immediately after the Board meeting on Friday. Topics to be discussed include:

Action Plan for Transition Effort (Status report and review) and

Auditing and Accounting Policy Committee (AAPC) Charter and Operating Procedures (review and approval).

Any interested person may attend the meeting as an observer. Board discussion and reviews are open to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Wendy Comes, Executive Director, 441 G St. NW, Room 6814, Washington, DC 20548, or call (202) 512-7350.

Authority:Federal Advisory Committee Act. Pub. L. 92-463.

Dated: May 12, 2000.

Wendy M. Comes,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 00-12433 Filed 5-16-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-01-M
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4911 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the exclusion for 

compensation for injuries or sickness to encompass posttraumatic stress 

disorder, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2020 

Mr. MERKLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the exclusion for compensation for injuries or sickness 

to encompass posttraumatic stress disorder, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FOR COMPENSATION FOR 

4 POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 104(a) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik7 ing ‘‘sickness’’ and inserting ‘‘sickness or posttraumatic 

8 stress disorder’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4911 IS

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The last sentence 

2 of section 104(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

3 is amended by striking ‘‘shall not apply’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘shall not apply to posttraumatic stress disorder or’’. 

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this section shall apply to compensation received after the 

7 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00058-CR

DAVEY LYNN CROCKETT APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 235TH DISTRICT COURT OF COOKE COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 90-052

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Davey Lynn Crockett attempts to appeal from an order denying 

his “Motion To Withdraw the Plea” agreement that he entered into with the State 

back in 1990. On March 20, 2017, we notified Crockett that, generally, an 

appellate court may consider appeals by criminal defendants only after a final 

judgment of conviction, see McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Fort Worth 1996, no pet.), and we informed him that this appeal may be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless he or any party desiring to continue the 

appeal filed with the court a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f), 44.3. Crockett filed two responses, but they do not 

show grounds for continuing the appeal.2 We therefore dismiss this appeal for 

want of jurisdiction. See Dainwood v. State, No. 09-07-00424-CR, 2007 WL 

2962772, at *1 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Oct. 10, 2007, no pet.) (mem. op., not 

designated for publication) (holding similarly).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: April 27, 2017

 

2Crockett provides no authority to support his contention that “when the 

trial court denied his motion, and entered a finding that the trial court did not have 

the actual ‘authority’ to grant the relief requested, an ‘appealable order’ resulted.” 

Perhaps this is because relevant authority holds just the opposite. See Arms v. 

State, No. 14-16-00077-CR, 2016 WL 1357166, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th

Dist.] Apr. 5, 2016, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (“An 

order denying a motion to withdraw a guilty plea is not a separately appealable 

order.”).
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

Actuate Corporation: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-113545, 333-104101, 333-84582, 333-62600, 333-56906, 333-33720,333-73015, and 333-59959) and in Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-67220 and 333-34410) of Actuate Corporation of our report dated March 13, 2006, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Actuate Corporation andsubsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related financial statementschedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which report appears in this December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Actuate Corporation.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Mountain View, California 

March 13, 2006 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos.333-124546, 333-113545, 333-104101, 333-84582, 333-62600, 333-56906, 333-59959, 333-73015, and 333-33720) pertaining to the Actuate Corporation 1998 Equity Incentive Plan, Actuate Corporation 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Actuate Corporation1998 Non-Employee Directors Option Plan, Actuate Corporation 2001 Supplemental Stock Option Plan, First Amended and Restated Tidestone Technologies, Inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan of 1999 and Tidestone Technologies, Inc. 1998 Incentive StockOption Plan and in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-67220 and 333-34410) of Actuate Corporation and in the related prospectuses of our report dated January 26, 2004, with respect to the December 31, 2003 consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of Actuate Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

 

San Francisco, California 

March 9, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             205
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,805
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,849
<INVENTORY>                                     57,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,891
<PP&E>                                         218,327
<DEPRECIATION>                                 134,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 190,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,415
<BONDS>                                         87,867
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         83
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                     (86,110)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   190,071
<SALES>                                        241,582
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               241,582
<CGS>                                          224,953
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  244,433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,482
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,910
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (21,243)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       110
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (21,353)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (21,353)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (5.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (5.28)


</TABLE>
#### John Haywood Petitioner, &c. *versus*John Main *et al.*

Under *St.*1833, *c.*60, § 2, a petition for a new trial presented by a citizen of an other State, after that statute went into operation, must be indorsed by some responsible citizen of this Commonwealth, although the action was tried before the passage of that statute, and the 6th section thereof provides, that it “ shall not affect any rights and liabilities ” exist» 05 under the provisions of law ; and this Court is not authorized to grant the petitioner leave to furnish an indorser after such petition shall have been entered, for the statute being peremptory that it shall be indorsed, the provision in Revised Stat. *c.*90, § 10, that this Court may in all cases require an indorser, does not apply.

At the October term of the Court of Common Pleas in 1832,'this action was tried, and a verdict was rendered against the petitioner. At the May term of this Court in 1833, he presented a petition for a new trial. Notice of the petition was not served until 1835, and at May term 1836, the respondent moved, that the petition be dismissed, because the peti*227doner resided in the State of New York, and the petition was not indorsed, in conformity with *St.*1833, c. 50, § *2,*(which statute went into operation before the May term 1833,) by some responsible person who was an inhabitant of this Commonwealth, This motion was sustained by *Wilde*J. The petitioner thereupon excepted ; and also moved for leave to furnish an indorser, which motion was overruled.

*Sept. 20th.*

*Sept.*23d.

*Bishop*and *Whiting,*for the petitioner.

*Hall*and *Sumner,*for the respondent.

Shaw C. J.

delivered the opinion of the Court. The statute of 1833 is peremptory, requiring an indorser when the petitioner is not an inhabitant of this Commonwealth. The proviso in the 6th section, saving cases where rights and liabilities were established, applies not to cases where a right to file a petition existed, but rights and liabilities arising under writs and petitions pending when the act went into operation in May, 1833. This petition being filed after that time, it fell within the rule and was not saved by the proviso, and therefore the petition cannot be sustained.

The provision, Revised Stat. c. 90, § 10, authorizing the Court in all cases to require an indorser does not apply, because, in the case of a petitioner from out of the State, the statute is imperative.

The Court are all of opinion, that the order to dismiss the petition for want of an indorsement, was right and must be affirmed.
#### § 2204.408 Judicial review.

Judicial review of final decisions on awards may be sought as provided in 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(2).
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 98 (Friday, May 19, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 31798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12561]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 91

[Docket No. FAA-2000-7110; Amendment No. 91-262]
RIN 2120-AG94


Special Visual Flight Rules

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends the language regarding aircraft operating 
in accordance with Special Visual Flight Rules (SVFR). Specially, this 
action will permit a general aviation pilot at a satellite airport 
where weather reporting is not available, to depart in meteorological 
conditions less than basic Visual Flight Rules (VFR) weather minimums 
provided that the pilot determines that he has the requisite flight 
visibility. The FAA is taking this action to reduce the number of 
unnecessary flight delays being faced by general aviation aircraft 
while providing an equivalent level of safety.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The rule is effective on May 23, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Avis P. Person, Airspace and Rules 
Division (ATA-400), Air Traffic Airspace Management Program, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 
20591; telephone number (202) 267-8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on March 24, 2000 
(65 FR 16114). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on May 23, 2000. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this notice confirms that this final rule will become 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 12, 2000.
Donald P. Byrne,
Assistant Chief Counsel, Regulations Division.
[FR Doc. 00-12561 Filed 5-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M