Mr.JoelCordesUNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCYREGIONIX75HawthorneStreetSan!&1!4105·3901AirMonitoringSupervisorSantaBarbaraCountyAirPollutionControlDistrict260NorthSanAntonioRoad,SuiteASantaBarbara,California93110-1315DearMr.Cordes:ThankyouforyoursubmissionofSantaBarbaraCountyAirPollutionControlDistrict's(APCD's)2013AnnualAirMonitoringNetworkPlaninJuly2013.Wehavereviewedthesubmitteddocumentbasedontherequirementssetforthunder40CFR58.Basedontheinformationprovidedintheplan,EPAapprovesallportionsofthenetworkplanexceptthosespecificallyidentifiedbelow.Pleasenotethatwecannotapproveportionsoftheannualnetworkplanforwhichtheinformationintheplanisinsufficienttojudgewhethertherequirementhasbeenmet,orforwhichtheinformation,asdescribed,doesnotmeettherequirementsasspecifiedin40CFR58.10andtheassociatedappendices.EPARegion9alsocannotapproveportionsoftheplanforwhichtheEPAAdministratorhasnotdelegatedapprovalauthoritytotheregionaloffices.Accordingly,thefirstenclosure(A.AnnualMonitoringNetworkPlanItemswhereEPAisNotTakingAction)providesalistingofspecificitemsofyouragency'sannualmonitoringnetworkplanwhereEPAisnottakingaction.Thesecondenclosure(B.AdditionalItemsRequiringAttention)isalistingofadditionalitemsintheplanthatEPAwishestobringtoyouragency'sattention.Thethirdenclosure(C.AnnualMonitoringNetworkPlanChecklist)isthechecklistEPAusedtoreviewyourplanforoverallitemsthatarerequiredtobeincludedintheannualnetwork planalongwithourassessmentofwhethertheplansubmittedbyyouragencyaddressesthoserequirements.Thefirsttwoenclosureshighlightasubsetofthemoreextensivelistofitemsreviewedinthethirdenclosure.Allcommentsconveyedviathisletter(andenclosures)shouldbeaddressed(throughcorrectionswithintheplan,additionalinformationbeingincluded,ordiscussion)innextyear'sannualmonitoringnetworkplan.onPapuIfyouhaveanyquestionsregardingthisletterortheenclosedcomments,pleasefeelfreetocontactmeat(415)947-4534orDenaat(415)972-3134.Sincerely,MeredithKurpius,ManagerAirQualityAnalysisOfficeEnclosures:A.AnnualMonitoringNetworkPlanItemswhereEPAisNotTakingActionB.AdditionalItemsRequiringAttentionC.AnnualMonitoringNetworkPlanChecklistcc:TerryDressler,Director,SantaBarbaraCountyAirPollutionControlDistrictGayleSweigert,CaliforniaAirResourcesBoardA. Annual Monitoring Network
Plan Items where EPA

is Not Taking Action We are not acting

on the portions

of annual network plans where either EPA Region

9 lacks the authority

to approve specific items

of the plan,

or EPA has determined

that

a requirement

is either
not met
or information

in the plan

is insufficient

to judge whether

the requirement

has been met. • System modifications

(e.g., site closures

or moves)

are subject

to approval

per 40 CFR 58.14(

c). Information provided

in the plan was insufficient

for EPA

to approve

the following system modification

listed

in the plan per the applicable requirement: relocation

of the Santa Ynez monitoring station. Therefore,

we are not acting

ori this item as part
of this year's annual network plan. • EPA identified
items

in your agency's annual monitoring network
plan where

a requirement

was not being met
or iirl'ormation

in the plan was insufficient

to judge whether

the requirement

was being met based

on 40 CFR 58.10 and the associated appendices. Therefore,

we are not acting

. on the following items: Item

Checklist
Row

Issue (Attachment

A) Distance
from trees

80

Not meeting requirement

in one instance Scale

of representativeness

17 Insufficient information

to judge Designation

of

a primary

38 Insufficient information

to judge

in some monitor

instances Distance

of site from nearest

73 Insufficient information

to judge

in some road

instances PM2.s collocation

37 Insufficient information

to judge Additional information

for each
of these items may
be found

for the row listed

il;l column

2, in the third enclosure

(C. Annual Monitoring Network Plan Checklist).B.AdditionalItemsRequiringAttention•[Item30]VAFBSTSPMtositetablerecordsthefrequencyofflowrateverificationisforautomatedPMsamplersinsteadofmanualsamplers.Assumingthisisatypo,pleasecorrectinnextyear'splan.•[Item43]:oTheN02,1monitoratLompocHStreetislistedasTAPI200ewithmethodcode74insteadof099.Assumingthisisatypo,pleasecorrectinnextyear'splan.oTheS02,1monitoratLompocHStreetislistedasTEl431withmethodcode100insteadof060.Assumingthisisatypo,pleasecorrectinnextyear'splan.oTheCO,3monitoratSantaBarbaraislistedasmethodcode593insteadof093.Assumingthisisatypo,pleasecorrectinnextyear'splan.oTheCO,1monitoratSantaMarialistedasTAPIT300uwithmethodcode067insteadof093.Assumingthisisatypo,pleasecorrectinnextyear'splan.•[Item44]Per40CFR58AppendixD,section(2)(e),theEPARegionalAdministratorandstateorlocalagencies"maydividetheoverallMSA/CSAmonitoringresponsibilitiesandrequirementsamongthevariousagenciestoachieveaneffectivenetworkdesign.FullmonitoringrequirementsapplyseparatelytoeachaffectedStateorlocalagencyintheabsenceofanagreementbetweentheaffectedagenciesandtheEPARegionalAdministrator."ThePlanstatesthat"SantaBarbaraCountywillschedulediscussionswithCARBtoformalizeanagreementtoshareresponsibilityforairmonitoringnetworkdesignwithinSantaBarbaraCounty."Forfutureplans,pleaseconfirmwhenanagreementhasbeenmadetosharenetWorkdesignresponsibilitiesforanyMSAsinyourjurisdictionandattachdocumentation.•[Item46]Pleaseidentifyeachmonitortypewithinthesitetablesfornextyear'splan.•[Items65&66]WereconuilendconsideringthePM2.snetworkrequirementforsitesthatrepresentarea-wideairquality,andtherequirementforasiteatmaximumconcentrationatneighborhoodorlargerscaleduringyournextnetworkassessment.

### C. ANNUAL MONITORING NETWORK PLAN CHECKLIST (Updated 11/26/20 13)

Year: 2013 Agency: Santa Barbara County APCD

40 CFR 58.1 O(a){l) requires that each Annual Network Plan (ANP) include information regarding the following types of monitors: SLAMS monitoring stations including FRM, FEM, and 

### ARM monitors that are part of SLAMS, NCore stations, STN stations, State speciation stations, SPM stations, and/or, in serious, severe and extreme ozone nonattainment areas, P AMS stations, and SPM monitoring stations.

40 CFR 58.10(a)(l) further directs that, ''The plan shall include a statement of purposes for each monitor and evidence that siting and operation of each monitor meets the requirements of appendices 

### A, C, D, and E of this part, where applicable." On this basis, review of the ANPs is based on the requirements listed in 58.10 along with those in Appendices A, C, D, and E.

EPA Region 

### 9 will not take action to approve or disapprove any item for which Part 58 grants approval authority to the Administrator rather than the Regional Administrators, but we will do a check to see 

## if the required information is included and correct. The items requiring approval by the Administrator are: P AMS, NCore, and Speciation (STN/CSN).

Please note that this checklist summarizes many of the requirements of 

### 40 CFR Part 58, but does not substitute for those requirements, nor do its contents provide a binding determination of compliance with those requirements. The checklist is subject to revision in the future and we welcome comments on its contents and structure.

Key: White = meets the requirement. Yellow = requirement is not met, or information is insufficient to make a determination. Action requested in next year's plan or outside tlie ANP process. (items listed in Enclosure A)

· ----- , =item requires attention in order to improve next year's plan (items listed in Enclosure B)

1

### ANP requirement Citation Was the info Does the Notes within 40 submitted? 1 

## If information CFR58 yes, page #s. provided 3 

### meet Flag if 

### the req? 4


### incorrecf?

1. Submit plan by July 1 51 58.10 (a)(l) Yes Yes
2. Statement of purpose for each monitor 58.10 (a)(1) Yes, Table 1.3 Yes

3. 30-day public comment 

### I inspection period' 58.10 (a)(l), Yes Yes 58.10 (a)(2)
4

. Modifications to SLAMS network- case when we are 58.10 (a)(2) Yes, pl5, 39 Yes

not approving actual system modifications (i.e

. , we 58.10(e) will do it outside the ANP process 6 ) 5. Modifications to SLAMS network- case when we are 58.10 (a)(2) Yes Insufficient to SBAPCD plans to move the Santa Ynez SLAMS site approving actual system modifications per 58.14(c) 58.10 (b)(5) judge to a new location to meet siting requirements within 58.10(e) the next 18 months and installation of equipment 

### has
58.14 (c) begun at the new site. Please submit details of proposed move/modifications to EPA Region IX for approval showing that conditions of 40 CFR58.14( c)

are met for the new site, and coordinate with EPA to discuss data collected at the site to date.

Note that proposed modifications listed in ANP (other 

### than as described above) do not require approval (i.e., modifications were made to replace
FEMIFRM PMIO monitors to other FEMIFRM monitors which do not require approval).


### 6. Does plan include documentation (e.g

. , attached NA NA No system modifications requiring approval were approval l etter) for system modifications that have reported for the period since last ANP.
been approved since last ANP approval? 

### 7. NCore site operational (by 1/1/2011) 58.10 (a)(3) NA NA No requirement

8. Pb site fo r 0.5-1.0 tpy sources operational (by 58.10 (a)(4) NA NA

-- No requirement

1 Response

**op~ons:** NA (Not Applicable), Yes, No, Incomplete, Incorrect. The responses "Incomplete" and "Incorrect" assume that some information has been provided.

2 To the best of our knowledge.
3 Assuming the information is correct
4 Response options: NA (Not Applicable)- [reason], Yes, No, Insufficient to Judge.

5 The affected state or local agency must document the process for obtaining public comment and include any comments received through the public notification process within
their submitted plan.
6 See 58.14(c) 

## 2 I
I

## ANP requirement Citation Was the info Does the Notes within 40 submitted? 1 

### If 

## information CFR58 

## yes, page #s. provided 3 

## meet Flag if 

## the req? 4 

## incorrecf? 12/27/2011)_ 9. N0 

## 2 plan for area-wide and RA40 sites submitted by 58.10 (a)(5) NA NA No requirement 711/2012 10.

**N~** area-wide and RA40 sites operational by 58.10 (a)(5) NA NA 1/1/2013 11.

**N~** plan for near-road sites submitted b_y 7/1/2013 58.10 00(5)_ NA NA No requirement 12. 

## so2 sites operational (by 111/2013) 58.10 (a)(6)

. Yes, p12-13 Yes and 58.13(d) 13. AQS site identification number for each site 58.10 (b)(1) Yes Yes Pages: 

### in detailed site information 14. Location of each site: street address and geographic 58.10 (b)(2) Yes Yes coordinates Pages: 

### in detailed site information 15. Sampling and analysis method(s) for each measured 58.10 (b)(3) Yes Yes paramete r Pages: 

### in detailed site information 16. Any proposals to remove or move a monitoring 58.10 (b)(5) Yes, p15, 39 Yes See 

### #5 above. SBAPCD plans to move the Santa station within a period of 18 months following plan Ynez SLAMS site to a new location to meet siting submittal requirements within the next 18 months. 17. Scale of representativeness for each monitor as 58.10(b)(6); Yes in most cases; Yes 

### in most cases; Santa Barbara SLAMS site N02 monitor is listed as defmed 

### in Appendix D AppD potentially insufficient to judge urban scale/ highest concentration. This combination incorrect for cases listed in is not typically suitable according to 40 CRF Part 58 information 

### in notes due to cases Appendix D, Table D-1.

cases listed in notes that are potentially p9 incorrect or require Lompoc H St PM monitors are listed as justification as an Neighborhood Scale/Population Oriented sites. The exception nearest road has I OK daily traffic and the monitors

·are 13m from road, and probe is 7m height. According to 40 CFR Part 58 Figure E-1, this distance should listed as micro or middle scale for certain pollutants.

El Capitan PM-I 0 monitor is listed as a Regional Scale/Background Level site. The nearest road has 50K daily traffic and the monitor is I OOm from road. According to 40 CFR Part 58 Figure E-1, this site

·- - ---- --- - - · --- L_

___ -- - - L_

_ sbould be categorized as Neighborhood scale for 

## 3

## ANP requirement Citation Was the info Does the Notes within 40 submitted? 1 

### H 

## information CFR58 yes, page #s. provided 3 

## meet Flag if 

## the req? 4 

## incorrecf?
certain pollutants.

18. Identification of sites suitable and sites not suitable 58.10 (bX7) Yes,p 13,17 Yes Santa Barbara and Santa Maria have FEM samplers ! for comparison to the annual PM 2 

### .s NAAQS as for regulatory monitoring. Lompoc H Street and '

described 

### in Part 58.30 Goleta do not meet FEM

**requiremen~.** so are nonregulatory monitors.

19. MSA, CBSA, CSA or other area represented by the 58.10 (b)(8) Yes,plO Yes Representative area for all sites 

### is Santa Barbaramonitor Pages: 

### in detailed Santa Maria MSA.
site information
20. Designation of any Pb monitors as either source- 58.10 (b)(9) N/A N/A No requirement
oriented or non-source-oriented
21. Any source-oriented Pb site for which a waiver 

## hal! 58.10 (bX10) N/A N/A No requirement

been granted by EPA RA
22. Any Pb monitor for which a waiver has been 58.10 (b){ll) N/A N/A No requirement requested or granted by EPA RA for use ofPb-PM 10 

### in lieu ofPb- TSP 23. Identification of required N0 2 monitors as either near- 58.10 (b)(12) N/A N/A
road or area-wide 24. Identification of any 

### PM2.s FEMs and/or ARMs not 58.10 (b)(13) N/A



## . N/A eligible to be compared to the NAAQS (Note 1: must 58.11 (e)
include required data assessment) (Note 2: Required SLAMS must monitor PM 2 • 5 with NAAOScomparable monitor at the required sample frequency.) 25. For SPMs listed as non-regulatory, note the start Date 58.20(c) N/A N/A
ofFRMIFEM/ARM at SPM. If> 24 months, and monitor is eligible for comparison to the NAAQS per 58.11 (e) and 58.30, the agency must supply information that App A, C orE requirements were not

met 26. Document how states and local agencies provide for 58.10 (c) Yes, pl7 Yes
the review of changes to a PM 2 

### .s monitoring network that impact the location of a violating PM 2 

### .s monitor.
27. Does the plan include a request for approval for and 58.11 (a) (2) N/A N/A
alternative to appendix A requirements for SPMs opemting_ a FRMIFEM/ ARM which also meets



### 4

## ANP requirement Citation Was the info Does the Notes · within 40 submitted? 1 

## If information CFR58 yes, page #s. provided 3 

## meet Flag if 

## the req? 4 

## incorrecf? appendixE? 28. Precision/ Accuracy reports submitted to AQS 58.16(a); Yes, p18 Yes AppA,l.3 and 5.1.1 29. Annual data certification submitted 58.15 Yes,p18 Yes '

i App.A 1.3 30. Frequency of flow rate verification for manual PM AppA3.3.2 Yes Yes VAFB STS PMlO site table records the frequency of samplers audit Pages: in detailed flow rate verification is for 

### automated PM samplers site information instead of 

### manual samplers. Assuming this is a typo, please correct in next _year's plan. 31. Frequency of flow rate verification for automated PM AppA3.2.3 Yes Yes analyzers audit Pages: in detailed site information 32. Frequency of

**on~-point** flow rate verification for Pb App A 3.3.4.1 N/A N/A samplers audit 33. Frequency of one-point QC check (gaseous) App.A3.2.1 Yes Yes Pages: in detailed site information 34. Date of last Annual Performance Evaluation App.A3.2.2 Yes Yes (gaseous) Pages : in detailed site information 35. Dates of last two semi-annual flow rate audits for PM AppA, 3.2.4 Yes Yes monitors and3.3.3 Pages: in detailed site information 36. Dates oflast two semi-annual flow rate audits for Pb App A 3.3.4.1 N/A N/A monitors 

### 37. PM2

. s collocation AppA3.2.5 No N/A-PQAO SBAPCD is part of the ARB PQAO, and relies on requirement the entire PQAO network to satisfy collocation requirements. It is ARB's responsibility to show that this requirement is met. ARB is currently working

on a network document that should address this. 

### 38. Designation of a primary monitor if there is more than Need to No Insufficient to Please specify which PM 10 monitor is the primary

one monitor for a pollutant at a site. determine judge monitor at El Capitan 

### in next year's plan. collocation 39. Distance between collocated monitors (Note: waiver App.A N/A N/A request or the date of previous waiver approval must 3.2.5.6 and be included 

### if the distance deviates from 3.2.6.3

--- --

-- ---- 

## 5

## ANP requirement Citation Was t he in f o D oes t h e Notes wit h in40 submitted? 1 

### If 

## information

I 

## CFR58 yes, page #s. provided 3 

## meet Flag if 

## the req? 4


## incorrecf? requirement.) 40. Manual PM 10 

### method collocation met? (note: AppA3.3.1 Yes,p20 Yes continuous PM 10 

### does not have this 

### requirement) 41. Pb collocation App A 3.3.4.3 N/A N/A 42. PM 1 a- 2 

### .s 

### collocation (note: only applies to Fresno and App A3.3

. 6 N/A N/A Phoenix NCore s i tes) 43. Instrument/monitoring method code for each monitor: App C 2.4.1.2 Yes Yes for most cases; The N0 2 , 

### I monitor at Lompoc H Street is listed as is it reported properly? Is it reported correctly (i.e., Pages: in detailed Insufficient to TAPI 200e with method code 74 instead of099. appropriate method code for regulatory monitors)? site information judge or incorrect Assuming this is a typo, 

### please correct in next year's in certain cases

- plan.

see Notes The S02, I monitor at Lompoc H Street is listed as TEl 431 with method code I 00 instead of 060. Assuming this is a typo, 

### please correct in next year's plan.

The CO, 3 monitor at Santa Barbara is listed as method code 593 instead of093.Assuming this is a typo, 

### please correct in next year's plan.

The CO, I monitor at Santa Maria listed as T API T300u with method code 067 instead of 093. Assuming this is a typo, 

### please correct in next year's plan. 44. 

### For agencies that share monitoring responsibilities in AppD2(e) Yes, p4 

### Yes

an MSA/CSA: does each affected State or local agency meet full monitoring requirements or is

an agreement between the affected agencies and the EPA Regional Administrator in place? 45. Start date for each monitor Required to Yes Yes determine i f Pages: in detailed otherreq. site information (e.g., min#

· and colloc)

are met 46. Instrument monitor type for each monitor Required to Yes, p7 Yes It 

### would be 

### helpful to identify each monitor type detennine if within the site tables for next year's plan. otherreq.

- - - 

### 6

### ANP requirement Citation Was t h e info · n oes the Notes within 40 s u bmitted? 1 

### H information

· CFR58 

## yes, page 

## #s. provided 3 

### meet F l ag if 

### the req? 4


### in correcf? (e.g., min# and colloc)

are met 47. Monitoring objective for each instrument AppD 1.1 

### Yes Yes 58

. 10 (bX6) Pages: in detailed site information 48. Site type for each instrument AppD 1.1.1 

### Yes, p9 Yes 49

. Instrument parameter code for each instrument Required to Yes Yes determine if 

### Pages: in detailed

I 

### otherreq. site information (e

. g., min# and colloc)

are met 50. Instrument parameter occurrence code for each Required to Yes Yes instrument determine if 

### Pages: in detailed otherreq

. site information (e.g., min# and colloc)

are met 51. Sampling season for ozone (note: date of waiver 58.10 (b)(4) Yes Yes All Year approval must be included if 

### the sampling season App D, 4

. l(i) Pages: in detailed deviates from requirement) site information 52. Sampling schedule for PM 2 .s

- 

### applies to year-round 58.10 (b)(4) Yes Yes and seasonal sampling schedules (note : date of waiver 58

. 12(d) Pages: in detailed approval must be inc l uded if 

### the sampling season

. AppD4.7 s i te information deviates from requirement) EPA flowchart 53

. Sampling schedule for PM 10 

### 58.10 (b)(4) Yes Yes 1 :6 day r equired

. I 

### 58.12(e) AppD4.6 54

. Sampling schedule for Pb 58

. 10 (b)(4) N/A N/A 58 .1 2(b) AppD4.5 55. 

### Sampling schedule for PM1a-2

. s 58.10 (b)(4) N/A N/A 58.12(f) AppD4.8 56

. Minimum# of monitors for 0 3 

### [Note : should be 

### App D, 4.1(a) Yes

, p10- 1 1 Yes Two sites required



## 7

## ANP requirement Citation Was the info Does the Notes within 40 submitted? 1 

### H 

## information CFR58 yes, page #s. provided 3 

## meet Flag if 

## the req? 4


## incorrect 2 

## ? supported by MSA ID, MSA population, DV, 

### # and monitors, and 

### # required monitors] 

### (see footnote) 7 

### TableD-2
57. Identification of max. cone. 0 3 

### monitor(s) App D 4.1_@ Yes,p25 Yes
58. Minimum monitoring requirements met for near-road AppD4.3.2 Yes,p12 Yes No sites are required per regulation.
N0 2 (2014 start date) 59. Minimum monitoring requirements met for area-wide AppD4.3.3 Yes,p12 Yes No sites are required per regulation.
N02 60. Minimum monitoring requirements met for RA-40 AppD4.3.4 Yes,.p12 Yes No sites are required per regulation.
N02 61. Minimum monitoring requirements met for so2 AppD4.4 Yes,p13 Yes [Note: Only monitors considered to be required SLAMs are eligible to be counted towards meeting minimum monitoring requirements.] 62. Minimum monitoring requirements met for Pb [Note: AppD4.5 Yes,p14 Yes No sites are required per regulation. Only monitors considered to 

### be required SLAMs are 58.13(a) eligible to be counted towards meeting minimum monitoring requirements.] 63. Minimum # of moriitors for PM 2 

### .s [Note 1: should be AppD, Yes, p13-14 Yes No sites are required, but have 2 sites in operation supported by MSA ID, MSA population, DV, 

### # 4.7.1(a) and (Santa Barbara and Santa Maria). monitors, and# required monitors] [Note 2: Only TableD-5 monitors considered to be required SLAMs are eligible to be counted towards meeting minimum monitoring requirements.] 

### 64. Optional PM 2

. 5 

### Network Clarifications: Provide a list Need to N/A N/A of required sites 

### if it does not include 

### all SLAMS. assess several [Note: default will assume 

### all SLAMS are considered requirements required sites.] 65. Required PM 2

. 5 

### sites represent 

### area-wide air 

### quality AppD N / A N / A There are no required PM 2 

### .s sites per minimum 4.7.l(b) monitoring requirements. Recommend considering 

### this

. requirement with the next network assessment.
66. For PM 2 .s, is 

### at least one site at neighborhood or AppD N/A N / A No sites are required; therefore this requirement is larger scale in an area of expected maximum 4.7.1(b)(l) not applicable. Recommend considering this concentration requirement with the next network assessment.
67. 

### If additioJ!al SLAMS PM 2 

### .s required,

**~-~re** 

### a site in AppD N/A N/A There are no required PM 2 

### .s sites per minimum

7 

### Only monitors considered to 

### be required SLAMs are eligible to be counted towards meeting minimum monitoring requirements. 

### In addition, ozone monitors that do not meet traffic count/distance requirements to be neighborhood scale ( 40 CFR 58 Appendix E, Table E-1) cannot be counted towards minimum monitoring requirements. 

## 8 **~**

## ANP requirement Citation Was the info Does the Notes within 40 submitted? 1 

## H information CFR58

**y~s,** 

## page #s. provided 3 

## meet Flag if 

## the req? 4 

## incorrecf?

an area of poor air quality 4.7.l(b)(2) monitoring

**r~uirements.** 68. Minimum monitoring requirements for continuous AppD4.7.2 N/A N/A There are no required PM 2 

### .s sites per minimum PM2.s monitoring requirements. 69. Requirements for PM 2

. s background and transport AppD4.7.3 N/A N/A- State level sites 70. Are PM 

### 2 .s Chemical Speciation requirements met for AppD4.7

. 4 N/A N/A

· There are no official CSN sites 

### in Santa Barbara official STN sites? County. 71. Minimum # of monitors for PM 10 AppD,4.6 Yes,pl3 Yes Required sites = 0-1. (a) and Table 

### D-4


# . . 72. Minimum monitoring requirements met for PM 

### 11 ,.2.s AppD4.8 N/A N/A This requirement applies to NCore only and there are mass no NCore sites 

### in Santa Barbara County. 73. Distance of site from nearest road AppE6 Yes Yes in most cases

- UCSB West Campus does not include nearest road Pages: in detailed insufficient to information. Please clarify in next year's plan. site information judge; see scale issues in 17 74. Traffic count of nearest road AppE Yes Yes Pages: 

### in detailed site information 75

. Groundcover AppE 3(a) Yes Yes

I Pages: 

### in detailed site information 76. Probe height AppE2 Yes Yes Pages: 

### in detailed site information 

### 77. Distance from supporting structure AppE2 Yes Yes Pages: 

### in detailed site information 78. Distance from obstructions on roof AppE4(b) Yes Yes Pages: 

### in detailed site information 79. Distance from obstructions not on roof AppE4(a) · Yes Yes Pages: 

### in detailed site information 80

. Distance from trees AppES Yes No Santa Ynez site is currently Sm from trees. SBAPCD Pages: in detailed is looking into relocating the site in next 18 months site information (see

_

#4).

--- - --- - ---- · -- 

### 9

## ANP requirement Citation Was the info within 40 

## submitted? 1 

### If 

## CFR58 yes, page #s. Flag if 

## incorrecf?

81. Distance to furnace or incinerator flue App E 3'(b) Yes Pages: in detailed site information
82. Unrestricted airflow AppE,4(a) Yes and4(b) Pages: in detailed site information
83. Probe material (if applicable) AppE9 Yes Pages: in detailed site information
84. Residence time (if applicable) AppE9 Yes Pages: in detailed site information



## Public Comments on Annual Network Plan
Were comments submitted to the S/Lff agency during the public comment period? 

## No.
If no, skip the remaining questions. If yes:

• Were any of the comments substantive?

o If yes, which ones? 

## Does the information provided 3 

## meet the req? 4



### Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

----



### o Explain basis for determination if any comments were considered not substantive:

• Did the agency respond to the substantive comments?

o If yes, was the response adequate? 

## Notes

360 degrees at 

### all sites for all monitors



### • Do the substantive comments require separate EPA response (i.e., agency response wasn't adequate)?

• Are the sections of the annual network plan that received substantive comments approvable after consideration of comments?

o If yes, provide rationale: I



### 10