alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in
connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Serena Software, Inc. (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code.



I, Robert I. Pender, Jr., Chief Financial
Officer of Serena Software, Inc. certify that:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Serena Software, Inc.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    ROBERT I. PENDER,
JR.Robert I. Pender, Jr. Senior Vice President, Finance And Administration, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial And Accounting Officer) And Director




Date: September 9, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL00-76-000]

Take notice that on May 12, 2000, French Broad Electric Membership Corporation (FBEMC) filed a complaint against Carolina Power & Light Company (CP&L) alleging that CP&L's rate for capacity charged to FBEMC for requirements service under a bundled Power Supply Agreement is unjust and unreasonable. FBEMC requests that the Commission establish hearing procedures to determine the just and reasonable rate to be effective 60 days after the filing of the complaint, direct CP&L to refund excessive amounts previously collected from FBEMC, and establish a refund effective date of 60 days after the filing of the complaint.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or protests must be filed on or before June 1, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222) for assistance. Answers                           ( print page 32084)                        to the complaint shall also be due on or before June 1, 2000.                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-12726  Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 10(a) 



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 


We consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to Registration          Statement No.
333-142592 on Form N-1A of our report dated September 24, 2009, relating to the financial
         statements and financials highlights of BlackRock Funds II, including BlackRock
Income Portfolio and          BlackRock Income Builder Portfolio appearing in the Annual
Report on Form N-CSR of BlackRock Funds II          for the year ended July 31, 2009, and
to the references to us under the headings “Financial Highlights”         in the
Prospectus and “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and “Financial Statements” in
the          Statement of Additional Information, which are part of such Registration
Statement. 


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

  

  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
        

   November 23, 2009
EXHIBIT 23 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-18417 and No. 333-98963) of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation of ourreport dated June 4, 2004 relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated June4, 2004 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Charlotte, North Carolina 

 

July 15, 2004
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                          IASIS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

                   SENIOR EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION PLAN

         Each individual designated as a senior executive officer (the "Senior
Executive") of IASIS Healthcare Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), by the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board") or the
Compensation Committee of the Board (the "Committee"), shall be entitled to
receive the following compensation:

SALARY:           Each Senior Executive shall receive an annual salary in an
                  amount determined by the Board and, if applicable, as set
                  forth in the Senior Executive's Employment Agreement.

BONUS:            Each Senior Executive shall be eligible to receive an annual
                  bonus upon the achievement of certain quantitative and
                  qualitative goals as determined by the Board and, if
                  applicable, as set forth in the Senior Executive's Employment
                  Agreement.

STOCK
OPTIONS:          Each Senior Executive shall be eligible to receive incentive
                  or non-qualified stock options (the "Options") under the
                  Company's 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and such other plans as
                  may be adopted by the Company from time to time, as approved
                  by the Board and, if applicable, as set forth in the Senior
                  Executive's Employment Agreement.

PURCHASE OF
STOCK:            Each Senior Executive shall be eligible to purchase the number
                  of shares of common stock or other capital stock of the
                  Company, separate and apart from the exercise of the Options,
                  as determined by the Board from time to time and, if
                  applicable, as set forth in the Senior Executive's Employment
                  Agreement, at a fair market value per share price as
                  determined by the Board and, if applicable, as set forth in
                  the Senior Executive's Employment Agreement.

PAID TIME
OFF:              Each Senior Executive shall be entitled to vacation, sick
                  leave and other paid time off in accordance with the Company's
                  normal personnel policies as amended from time to time, or as
                  approved by the Board or the Committee and, if applicable, as
                  set forth in the Senior Executive's Employment Agreement.

PARTICIPATION
IN EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT
PLANS:            Each Senior Executive shall be entitled to participate in such
                  health, life, disability and other insurance plans, retirement
                  plans and other employee benefit plans of the Company as in
                  effect from time to time, in accordance with the Company's
                  normal personnel policies, as amended from time to time, or as
                  approved by the Board or the Committee and, if applicable, as
                  set forth in the Senior Executive's Employment Agreement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       UT
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      467,573
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     29,724
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         139,307
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        84,106
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 720,710
<COMMON>                                        19,423
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       37,188
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            193,776
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 250,387
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,960
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           154,413
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  74,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   25,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 214,950
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  720,710
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      602,832
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            17,962
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     535,145
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     553,107
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         49,725
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,829
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  51,554
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        19,088
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,466
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         97
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   32,369
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        22,825
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       14,169
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          54,130
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.84

<FN>
Capital surplus, paid in includes $(24,017) treasury stock.


  
                          
                                    84
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY
-----------------

The undersigned, directors of Kellwood Company (the Company), do hereby
constitute and appoint Hal J. Upbin or W. Lee Capps, III as his or her true
and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, to
sign the Company's Form 10-K Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as Amended for the fiscal year ended January
29, 2005, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto the attorney-in-fact full power and authority to
sign such document on behalf of the undersigned and to make such filing, as
fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that the attorney-in-fact, or
his substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Dated: March 10, 2005



/s/ Robert J. Baer                          /s/ Janice E. Page
---------------------------------           -----------------------------------
Robert J. Baer                              Janice E. Page


/s/ Martin Bloom                            /s/ Robert C. Skinner, Jr.
---------------------------------           -----------------------------------
Martin Bloom                                Robert C. Skinner, Jr.


/s/ Kitty G. Dickerson                      /s/ Hal J. Upbin
---------------------------------           -----------------------------------
Kitty G. Dickerson, Ph.D.                   Hal J. Upbin


/s/ Jerry M. Hunter                         /s/ Harvey A. Weinberg
---------------------------------           -----------------------------------
Jerry M. Hunter                             Harvey A. Weinberg


/s/ Larry R. Katzen
---------------------------------
Larry R. Katzen
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCPR-12-0000585 

NO. SCPR-12-0000585 
 10-JUL-2012

02:58 PM 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I 

IN RE LLOYD I. MASHITA, Petitioner.
 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
 

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN AND SURRENDER LICENSE
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and McKenna, JJ.,


and Intermediate Court of Appeals Associate Judge Ginoza,


assigned by reason of vacancy)
 

Upon consideration of Petitioner Lloyd I. Mashita’s 

petition to resign and surrender his license to practice law in 

the State of Hawai'i, filed pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules of 

the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i (RSCH), and of the 

affidavits and exhibits in support thereof, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted. 


IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g), 


that Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and
 

record requirements of RSCH Rule 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g).
 

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the 

name of Petitioner Lloyd I. Mashita, attorney number 1622, from 

the roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai'i, effective with the 

filing of this order. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, July 10, 2012. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice 00-047] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of prospective patent license. 

# SUMMARY:

NASA hereby gives notice that Meridian Holdings, Inc., of Los Angeles, CA, has applied for a partially exclusive license to practice the inventions described and claimed in U.S. Patent Number 5,377,100, entitled “A METHOD OF ENCOURAGING ATTENTION BY CORRELATING VIDEO GAME DIFFICULTY WITH ATTENTION LEVEL,” and NASA Case No. LAR 15817-1, entitled “A METHOD OF ENCOURAGING PHYSIOLOGICAL SELF-REGULATION THROUGH MODULATION OF AN OPERATOR'S CONTROL INPUT TO A VIDEO GAME OR TRAINING SIMULATOR,” both of which are assigned to the United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Written objections to the prospective grant of a license should be sent to Langley Research Center. 

# DATES:

Responses to this notice must be received by July 11, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Helen M. Galus, Patent Attorney, Langley Research Center, Mail Code 212, Hampton, VA 23681-2199; telephone 757-864-3227; facsimile 757-864-9190. 

Dated: May 1, 2000. 

Edward A. Frankle, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 00-11981 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
#### ERNEST NOSKER et v ROBERT S. NOSKER et

Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Wayne Co

No 865.

Decided April 23, 1930

Hiram B. Swartz, Wooster, for plaintiffs.

Weiser & Weimer, Wooster, for Defendant Robert S. Nosker.

Critchfield, McSweeney & Critchfield, Wooster, for Defendant Carolyn Nosker.

*352PER CURIAM

From the evidence introduced in the trial of this action in this court and the admissions of counsel, we find that said allegations of the .answer are true and that this action, so far as the parties to it are concerned, is a collusive one.

A suit is collusive when brought by seemingly adverse parties under secret agreement and co-operation, with a view to having some legal question decided which is not involved in a real controversy between them.

In this case, the evidence conclusively shows that the suit was brought in the Court of Common Pleas for the sole purpose of affecting the rights of Carolyn Nosker, with the implied, if not express, understanding between plaintiffs and Robert S. Nosker that he would not contest the same and that it should affect only the rights of Carolyn Nosker.

But it is claimed that in this court the suit has ceased to be collusive and has become adversary, for the reason that plaintiffs are now prosecuting the same for the purpose of obtaining relief against their father, Robert S. Nosker.

With this contention we cannot agree. When brought the suit was clearly collusive and the sole purpose in bringing it was to affect the rights of Carolyn Nosker. It was such collusive action that w,as tried in the Court of Common Pleas, and it was such collusive action that was appealed to this court, and the element of affecting the rights of Carolyn Nosker and the alimony settlement made between her and Robert S. Nosker is still present in the case; and the fact that Robert S. Nosker does not desire to carry out the dishonest arrangement made by him in fraud of the rights of his wife, does not work a change in the character of the action.

Where there is secret or dishonest arrangement in fraud of the rights of another, there is collusion, and a suit brought in pursuance of and in carrying out such collusive arrangement, should not be entertained either by the trial or appellate courts.

The petition -of the plaintiffs will therefore be dismissed, at their costs.

Funk, PJ., Pardee, J., and Washburn, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 21
                                                                      ----------


SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT.


North American Galvanizing Company*
2250 East 73rd Street - Suite 300
Tulsa, OK 74136-6832

Reinforcing Services, Inc. **
2250 East 73rd Street - Suite 300
Tulsa, OK 74136-6832

Premier Coatings, Inc. **
2250 East 73rd Street - Suite 300
Tulsa, OK 74136-6832

NAGaIv-Ohio, Inc. **
1723 Cleveland Avenue, SW
Canton, OH 44707

Rogers Galvanizing Company - Kansas City **
2250 East 73rd Street - Suite 300
Tulsa, OK 74136-6832

   * Wholly owned direct subsidiary
  ** Wholly owned indirect subsidiary
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****List of lights, radio aids, andfog signals. British Isles, English Channel, and North Sea**
 
2013 | 2014 | 2017
 
SuDoc Number:D 5.317/2:114/ | D 5.317:114/
Item Number:0378-D (online)
CGP systemNumber:000936722
 
April 3, 2018
#### SAYRE & CO., Ltd., Appellant, v. A. G. MADDOX, Commissioner of Revenue and Taxation, Appellee.

No. 20771.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

May 5, 1967.

Barrett, Ferenz & Trapp, W. Scott Barrett, David S. Madis, Oakland, Cal., *&*Agana, Guam, for appellant.

Harold W. Burnett, Atty. Gen., C. E. Morrison, Asst. Atty. Gen., Olen Burnett, Atty., Agana, Guam, for appellee.

Before BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and TAVARES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is reversed on the authority of Atkins-Kroll (Guam) Ltd. v. Government of Guam, 367 F.2d 127 (9th Cir. 1966)- certiorari denied 386 U.S. 993, 87 S.Ct. 1309,18 L.Ed.2d 339 (1967).
No. 17,829.

#### James *v.*Lake Erie and Western Railway Co.

*Appeal.—When*Premature.—An appeal from the ruling of the trial court sustaining a demurrer, taken before entry of final judgment thereon, is premature.

From the Madison Circuit Court.

*Wood & Ellis,*for appellant.

*A. E. Hackedorn, J. B. Cockrum*and *Chipman, Keltner & Hendee,*for appellee.

Monks, J.

This is the second appeal of this cause. The first appeal was to the Appellate Court, where the judgment was reversed and the court below directed to sustain the demurrer to the complaint. *Lake Erie, etc., R. R., Co.*v. *James,*10 Ind. App. 550. On the return of the cause to the court below, the demurrer was sustained and appellant filed an amended complaint. Appellee demurred to the amended complaint for want of facts, which was sustained, to which ruling of the court appellant excepted. The only error assigned in this court calls in question the action of the court in sustaining appellee’s demurrer to the amended complaint.

Counsel for appellee insist that no question is presented by the record for the reason that it does not appear from the record that final judgment has been rendered in the cause.

An appeal only lies from judgments that make a disposition of a cause except as provided by statute. *Thomas, Admr.,*v. *Chicago, etc., R. W. Co.,*139 Ind. *631462; *Champ*v. Kendrick, 130 Ind. 545; *Northcutt*v. *Buckles,*60 Ind. 577.

Filed April 23, 1896.

The final entry *of*the proceedings of the court below is as follows: *“Comes*now the parties by counsel and the demurrer to the complaint is sustained by the court, to which ruling of the court the plaintiff (appellant) excepts and refuses to plead further, and prays an appeal to the Supreme Court, which prayer the court grants.”

As no final judgment was rendered, the appeal was prematurely taken. The appeal is therefore dismissed.