alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1917.157 Battery charging and changing. ( a ) Only designated persons shall change or charge batteries.
( b ) Battery charging and changing shall be performed only in areas designated by the employer.
( c ) Smoking and other ignition sources are prohibited in charging areas.
( d ) Filler caps shall be in place when batteries are being moved.
( e ) Parking brakes shall be applied before batteries are charged or changed.
( f ) When a jumper battery is connected to a battery in a vehicle, the ground lead shall connect to ground away from the vehicle's battery. Ignition, lights and accessories on the vehicle shall be turned off before connections are made.
( g ) Batteries shall be free of corrosion buildup and cap vent holes shall be open.
( h ) Adequate ventilation shall be provided during charging.
( i ) Facilities for flushing the eyes, body and work area with water shall be provided wherever electrolyte is handled, except that this requirement does not apply when employees are only checking battery electrolyte levels or adding water.
( j ) Carboy tilters or siphons shall be used to handle electrolyte in large containers.
( k ) Battery handling equipment which could contact battery terminals or cell connectors shall be insulated or otherwise protected.
( l ) Metallic objects shall not be placed on uncovered batteries.
( m ) When batteries are being charged, the vent caps shall be in place.
( n ) Chargers shall be turned off when leads are being connected or disconnected.
( o ) Installed batteries shall be secured to avoid physical or electrical contact with compartment walls or components.
[48 FR 30909, July 5, 1983, as amended at 62 FR 40202, July 25, 1997]
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3411 — UGC / NOOS)

(2004/C 177/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 May 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

----
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

39–011 2014

113th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 113–149 

NOTIFICATION OF FURTHER TARGETED AIRSTRIKES 

IN IRAQ 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

A NOTIFICATION OF FURTHER TARGETED AIRSTRIKES TO 

RECAPTURE THE MOSUL DAM 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2014.—Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 

ordered to be printed 


SSpencer on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with HEARINGE:\Seals\Congress.#13

SSpencer on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with HEARING
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, August 17, 2014. 

Hon. JOHN A. BOEHNER, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: On August 14, 2014, I authorized the U.S. 

Armed Forces to conduct targeted airstrikes to support operations 

by Iraqi forces to recapture the Mosul Dam. These military operations will be limited in their scope and duration as necessary to 

support the Iraqi forces in their efforts to retake and establish control of this critical infrastructure site, as part of their ongoing campaign against the terrorist group the Islamic State of Iraq and the 

Levant (ISIL). The failure of the Mosul Dam could threaten the 

lives of large numbers of civilians, endanger U.S. personnel and facilities, including the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, and prevent the 

Iraqi government from providing critical services to the Iraqi populace. Pursuant to this authorization, on the evening of August 15, 

2014, U.S. military forces commenced targeted airstrike operations 

in Iraq. 

I have directed these actions, which are in the national security 

and foreign policy interests of the United States, pursuant to my 

constitutional authority to conduct U.S. foreign relations and as 

Commander in Chief and Chief Executive. These actions are being 

undertaken in coordination with the Iraqi government. 

I am providing this report as part of my efforts to keep the Congress fully informed, consistent with the War Powers Resolution 

(Public Law 93–148). I appreciate the support of the Congress in 

this action. 

Sincerely, 

BARACK OBAMA. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with HEARING
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                                                                 EXHIBIT 12

                                      KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY
                         Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                 (in thousands except ratio data)
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Year Ended December 31,             
                                                          1992       1993      1994      1995      1996  
<S>                                                     <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>     
Fixed Charges:                                                                                           
  Interest on First Mortgage Bonds . . . . . . . . .    $13,275    $17,472   $19,090   $19,090   $14,914 
  Interest on Other Long-term Debt . . . . . . . . .      7,668      2,033      -        2,422     6,446   
  Interest on Short-term Debt. . . . . . . . . . . .        413      1,001     1,621     2,242     2,849 
  Miscellaneous Interest Charges . . . . . . . . . .        861        523       485       510       555 
  Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals. . . .        800        800       700       700       800 
       Total Fixed Charges . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $23,017    $21,829   $21,896   $24,964   $25,564 
                                                                                                         
Earnings:                                                                                                
  Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $26,537    $18,031   $25,273   $25,128   $16,973 
  Plus Federal Income Taxes. . . . . . . . . . . . .      1,465      1,620     2,178     3,914     5,119 
  Plus State Income Taxes. . . . . . . . . . . . . .      1,891      1,116     1,154     1,420       598 
  Plus Fixed Charges (as above). . . . . . . . . . .     23,017     21,829    21,896    24,964    25,564 
       Total Earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $52,910    $42,596   $50,501   $55,426   $48,254 
                                                                                                         
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges . . . . . . . . .       2.29       1.95      2.30      2.22      1.88 
</TABLE>
#### HUTCHISON, In Re Estate of

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21438.

Decided May 22, 1929

Syllabus by

MARSHALL, CJ.

PERSONAL PROPERTY

(420 J) Where a certificate of stock in a corporation is issued in the joint names of two persons by their agreement and consent the delivery of the certificate to one is a delivery to both and the possession of one is the posession of both.

While joint tenancy with the incidental right of survivorship does not exist in Ohio parties may nevertheless contract for a joint ownership with the right of survivor-ship and at the death of one of the joint owners the survivor succeeds to the title to the entire interest, not upon the principle of survivorship as„an incident to the joint tenancy but by the operative provisions of the contract.

DECEDENTS’ ESTATES

(220 Wg) Where two persons purchase property to be owned by them in common during teir joint lives and at the death of either to become the property of the other each party has. .an undivided one-half interest during their joint lives and each has a vested estate in remainder in the one-half interest of the other.

Kinkade, Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ, concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [AK-962-1410-HY] 

In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that a decision to issue conveyance under the provisions of Sec. 14(e) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1613(e), will be issued to Doyon, Limited. The lands involved are in the vicinity of Fort Yukon, Alaska.

## Fairbanks Meridian, Alaska

T. 18 N., R. 14 E.,

Secs. 29 and 32, those lands formerly within Native allotment F-14713 Parcel B.

Containing approximately 40 acres.

                    A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four (4) consecutive weeks, in the                     *Fairbanks Daily News Miner.*                     Copies of the decision may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the Bureau of Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7599, (907) 271-5960.                 

                    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected by the decision, an agency of the Federal government, or regional corporation, shall have until June 19, 2000 to file an appeal. However, parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in the Bureau of Land Management at the address identified above, where the requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR Part 4, Subpart                           ( print page 31927)                        E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.                 

Stephanie Clusiau,

Land Law Examiner, Branch of ANCSA Adjudication.

[FR Doc. 00-12611 Filed 5-18-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-$$-U
[No. 27279-2-II.

Division Two.

December 13, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Dennis Keith Smith, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 96-1-00957-1, Barbara D. Johnson, J., entered April 25, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Houghton and Bridgewater, JJ.
#### § 1612.1 Purpose and scope.

This part contains the regulations of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (hereinafter, the Commission) implementing the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976, 5 U.S.C. 552b, which entitles the public to the fullest practicable information regarding the decision-making processes of the Commission. The provisions of this part set forth the basic responsibilities of the Commission with regard to the Commission's compliance with the requirements of the Sunshine Act and offers guidance to members of the public who wish to exercise any of the rights established by the Act.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                                                                 EXHIBIT 12

                             KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY
                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                        (in thousands except ratio data)
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Year Ended December 31,
                                                          1994       1995      1996      1997      1998
<S>                                                     <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Fixed Charges:
  Interest on First Mortgage Bonds . . . . . . . . .    $19,090    $19,090   $14,914   $14,867   $13,936
  Interest on Other Long-term Debt . . . . . . . . .       -         2,422     6,446     8,597    12,188
  Interest on Short-term Debt. . . . . . . . . . . .      1,621      2,242     2,849     3,034     2,455
  Miscellaneous Interest Charges . . . . . . . . . .        485        510       555       559       634
  Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals. . . .        700        700       800     1,700     1,500
       Total Fixed Charges . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $21,896    $24,964   $25,564   $28,757   $30,713

Earnings:
  Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $25,273    $25,128   $16,973   $20,746   $21,676
  Plus Federal Income Taxes. . . . . . . . . . . . .      2,178      3,914     5,119     9,415     9,785
  Plus State Income Taxes. . . . . . . . . . . . . .      1,154      1,420       598     2,190     2,096
  Plus Fixed Charges (as above). . . . . . . . . . .     21,896     24,964    25,564    28,757    30,713
       Total Earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $50,501    $55,426   $48,254   $61,108   $64,270

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges . . . . . . . . .       2.30       2.22      1.88      2.12      2.09
</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4909 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the collection of a health 

care copayment by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from a veteran 

who is a member of an Indian Tribe. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2020 

Mr. TESTER (for himself and Mr. MORAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the collection of a health care copayment by the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs from a veteran who is a member of 

an Indian Tribe. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Native American Vet5 eran Parity in Access to Care Today Act’’ or the ‘‘Native 

6 American Veteran PACT Act’’. 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4909 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON COLLECTION OF A HEALTH CARE 

2 COPAYMENT BY THE SECRETARY OF VET3 ERANS AFFAIRS FROM A VETERAN WHO IS A 

4 MEMBER OF AN INDIAN TRIBE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1730A of title 38, United 

6 States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘catastroph8 ically disabled’’ and inserting ‘‘certain’’; 

9 (2) by inserting ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—’’ before 

10 ‘‘Notwithstanding’’; 

11 (3) by striking ‘‘a veteran who is catastroph12 ically disabled, as defined by the Secretary,’’ and in13 serting ‘‘a covered veteran’’; and 

14 (4) by adding at the end the following new sub15 section: 

16 ‘‘(b) COVERED VETERAN DEFINED.—In this section, 

17 the term ‘covered veteran’ means a veteran who— 

18 ‘‘(1) is catastrophically disabled, as defined by 

19 the Secretary; or 

20 ‘‘(2) is an Indian or urban Indian (as those 

21 terms are defined in section 4 of the Indian Health 

22 Care Improvement Act (25 U.S.C. 1603)).’’. 

23 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

24 at the beginning of chapter 17 of such title is amended 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4909 IS

1 by striking the item relating to section 1730A and insert2 ing the following new item: 

‘‘1730A. Prohibition on collection of copayments from certain veterans.’’. 

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall take effect on the date that is one year 

5 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
#### CHARLES A. GRAHAM v. WILLIAM S. CONRAD.1

December 17, 1896.

Nos. 10,326 — (178).

Appeal from Justice — Dismissal—Judgment—Laws 1895, e. 24.

Since the enactment of Laws 1895, c. 24, which provides that where an appeal from a justice’s court shall for any cause be dismissed in district court, such court shall enter judgment in the action affirming the judgment of the* justice, with all costs, no appeal will lie from the order of dismissal, but must be taken, if at all, from the judgment entered in district court.

*471Appeal by defendant from an order of tbe district court for Bamsey county, Willis, J.

Dismissed.

*JE. Benton*OVmsted, for appellant.

*J. M.*Hawthorne, for respondent.

1

 Reported in 69 N. W. 215.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appealed from an order of the district court directing the dismissal of an appeal from a justice’s court and affirming a judgment rendered therein. It was held in Ross v. Evans, 30 Minn. 206, 14 N. W. 897, that an order dismissing an appeal from a justice’s court for want of jurisdiction apparent on the face of the return was within the terms of G. S. 1894, § 6140, subd. 5, and appealable. But by Laws 1895, c. 24, it was enacted that in all cases where an appeal from a justice’s court shall for any cause be dismissed in district court, such court shall enter judgment in the action, affirming the judgment of the justice, with all costs. The passage of this act changed the rule in reference to an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing an appeal from a justice’s court, because the reason for the rule as stated in the Boss Case no longer exists. Such appeal must now be taken, if at all, from the judgment entered in district court. Appeal dismissed.
# EUR-Lex - 32000R1357 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R1357

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1357/2000 of 27 June 2000 amending Regulation (EC) No 1251/96 opening and providing for the administration of the tariff quotas in the poultrymeat sector **

*
Official Journal L 155 , 28/06/2000 P. 0038 - 0039 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1357/2000

of 27 June 2000

amending Regulation (EC) No 1251/96 opening and providing for the administration of the tariff quotas in the poultrymeat sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1095/96 of 18 June 1996 on the implementation of the concessions set out in Schedule CXL drawn up in the wake of the conclusion of the GATT XXIV.6 negotiations(1), and in particular Article 1 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) In the framework of the World Trade Organisation, the Community has undertaken to open tariff quotas for certain products in the poultrymeat sector; whereas as a result, detailed rules for the application of those quotas from 1 July 2000 should be laid down;

(2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1251/96(2), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1327/1999(3), provides for the administration of those quotas for the period 1 July 1999 to 30 June 2000; whereas provision should be made for their administration from 1 July 2000;

(3) Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Poultrymeat and Eggs,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 1251/96 is hereby amended as follows:

1. Article 1 is replaced by the following:

"Article 1

The import tariff quotas listed in Annex I are opened annually for the product groups and under the conditions indicated therein."

2. Annex I is replaced by the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 1 July 2000.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 June 2000.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 146, 20.6.1996, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 161, 29.6.1996, p. 136.

(3) OJ L 157, 24.6.1999, p. 37.

ANNEX

"ANNEX I

>TABLE>"
#### William F. Bowen, as Administrator of the Estate of Leonard I. Long, Deceased, Appellant, v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Respondent.

Argued January 22, 1937;

decided March 9, 1937.

*558
      *J. Irwin Shapiro*and *Murray Rubien*for appellant.

*H. S. Ogden*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: Hubbs, J.
# EUR-Lex - 32000R0546 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R0546

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 546/2000 of 14 March 2000 amending Regulation (EC) No 2367/1999 introducing preventive distillation as provided for in Article 38 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 for the 1999/2000 wine year **

*
Official Journal L 067 , 15/03/2000 P. 0007 - 0007 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 546/2000

of 14 March 2000

amending Regulation (EC) No 2367/1999 introducing preventive distillation as provided for in Article 38 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 for the 1999/2000 wine year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 of 16 March 1987 on the common organisation of the market in wine(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1677/1999(2), and in particular Article 38(5) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2367/1999(3), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 286/2000(4), introduces the preventive distillation provided for in Article 38 of Regulation (EEC) No 822/87.

(2) The final data on supplies for the current wine year are now available. The provisional total Community volume should be adjusted on the basis of those data from 10000000 hl to 12000000 hl of table wine. The breakdown of that volume by production region must accordingly be revised.

(3) For the purpose of properly administering the measure this Regulation should be made to apply with effect from the date of the communication referred to in Article 1(5) of Regulation (EC) No 2367/1999.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Wine,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 2367/1999 is amended as follows:

1. In Article 1(1) and (5) the volume of 10000000 hl is replaced by 12000000 hl.

2. The table in the second subparagraph of Article 1(1) is replaced by the following:

">TABLE>"

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 24 February 2000.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 March 2000.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 84, 27.3.1987, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 199, 30.7.1999, p. 8.

(3) OJ L 283, 6.11.1999, p. 10.

(4) OJ L 31, 5.2.2000, p. 81.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certificationof the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Herbert Lindo,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Kenilworth SystemsCorporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such AnnualReport on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of Kenilworth Systems Corporation.

 
| By:    | /s/ Herbert Lindo       |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Herbert Lindo           |   |
| Title: | Chief Executive Officer |   |
| Date:  | March 12, 2010     |   |

 

***Remainder of page intentionally left blank***

 

1

----