alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4597 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4597

To require U.S. Customs and Border Protection to permit the entry into 
    the United States of pets accompanying United States nationals 
             repatriating during public health emergencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 16, 2020

Mr. Kennedy (for himself and Mr. Booker) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require U.S. Customs and Border Protection to permit the entry into 
    the United States of pets accompanying United States nationals 
             repatriating during public health emergencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    The Act may be cited as the ``Permanently Uniting Pets Stateside 
Act'' or the ``PUPS Act''.

SEC. 2. ENTRY OF PETS OF UNITED STATES NATIONALS REPATRIATING DURING 
              PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCIES.

    (a) In General.--The Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection shall permit the entry into the United States of a pet 
accompanying a covered individual entering the United States without 
regard to the requirements of the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention or the Department of Agriculture with respect to the entry 
of pets into the United States if the individual agrees to comply with 
those requirements as soon as practicable after entering the United 
States.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Covered individual.--The term ``covered individual'' 
        means an individual who--
                    (A) is a citizen of the United States or an alien 
                lawfully admitted for permanent residence to the United 
                States;
                    (B) has been living or traveling outside the United 
                States; and
                    (C) is returning to the United States during a 
                public health emergency declared under section 319 of 
                the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d).
            (2) Pet.--The term ``pet'' means a domestic dog, cat, or 
        bird.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 27197-4-II.

Division Two.

December 6, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Steven Ralph Johnston, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 00-1-04816-7, Frederick W. Fleming, J., entered April 6, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Hunt, C.J., and Bridgewater, J.
[No. 19961-4-III.

Division Three.

October 31, 2002.]

#### Frank Hernandez, *as Yakima County Tax Assessor,*et al., *Appellants,*v. Ray Hall, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 97-2-03016-1, C. James Lust, J., entered January 17, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, C.J., concurred in by Kurtz and Kato, JJ.
#### THATCHER v P O & D R R CO

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21595.

Decided June 12, 1929

Syllabus by

MARSHALL, CJ.

ERROR PROCEEDINGS

(260 S) Where an error proceeding is filed in this court as of right, under a claim that it involves questions arising under the Constitution of the State of Ohio or the Constitution of the United States, and no motion is filed to certify the record, the court will not hear and determine the same, unless it is shown that the constitutional questions were presented to and determined by the court of first instance.

REAL ESTATE

(510 C) The provisions of Section 5 of Article 13 of the Constitution, requiring the compensation in appropriation proceedings for a right of way for a corporation to be “ascertained by a jury of twelve men,” relates to the mode of trial and not to the qualifications of jurors.

The word “men” is used in a generic sense of persons, rather than in a limited sense of males.

Kinkade, Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ, concur.
---

Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Financial Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard R. Sawyer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Richard R. SawyerRichard R. SawyerChief Financial OfficerMay 14, 2010
United States Securities & Exchange Commission EDGAR Filing


Exhibit 10.6

Options Media Group Holdings, Inc.

123 NW 13th Street, Suite 300

Boca Raton, Florida 33432




October 23, 2009







GFT Holdings, Inc.

5014 Sanctuary Lane

Boca Raton, FL 33431

Attention: Nelson Gerard, President




Re:

Secured Loan Agreement 




Dear Mr. Gerard:




This letter agreement (the “Agreement”) sets forth the terms and conditions for the amendment of that certain Secured Promissory Note dated March 13, 2009 in the original principal amount of $300,000 made by Options Media Group Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Company”) in favor of GFT Holdings, Inc. (“Holder”), as amended by that certain letter agreement dated August 13, 2009 (the “Note”) and that certain Secured Loan Agreement dated March 13, 2009 between the Company and the Holder, as amended by that certain letter agreement dated August 13, 2009 (the “Loan Agreement”). 




In consideration for the Holder extending the due date of the Note from September 30, 2009 to December 31, 2009 at which time the entire principal balance and all accrued interest shall be due and payable, waiving interest which has accrued under the Note through September 30, 2009, and not exercising the right to charge default interest under the Note, the Company shall, upon receipt of the Holder’s executed Agreement, the original Note, and an investment representation letter in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, issue the Holder an amended and restated note in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B and 500,000 shares of common stock of the Company.  




All other terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement and of any guaranty or indemnity agreement executed and delivered by anyone in connection herewith or therewith shall remain in full force and effect.




If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please sign in the place indicated below and return an executed copy to us.




			
	 
	 
	Very truly yours,


	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Scott Frohman


	 
	 
	Chief Executive Officer











GFT Holdings, Inc.

October 23, 2009

Page 2















			








AGREED AND ACCEPTED:







GFT Holdings, Inc.




By: __________________________

        Nelson Gerard, President
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Pl’ff, v. THOMAS SHEPHERD and MATTHEW GIBB, Def’ts.

*W. A. Boyd,*for pl’S; *H. 0. Be Witt,*for def’ts.

Motion to vacate.

Judgment entered on forfeited recognizance.

Application granted.
**Exhibit 10.3**

 

***OWENS BROKERAGE, LTD.***

Commercial & Investment Properties

Property Management

 

**LEASE EXTENSION - ANNEX SPACE**

 

This Rider Amends that original Lease dated June 1, 2003 betweenKenilworth Systems Inc. [Tenant] and Nassau County P.B.A. [Landlord] fortenancy at 185 Willis Avenue – Mineola, N.Y...[second floor].

 

This Rider is effective **August 1**,2003 until May 31, 2006 and applies directly to the annexed space adjacentto the original Lease premises.

 

All terms and requirements of the aforementioned Lease prevailthroughout this additional period. Consolidated rental for both suites will be $2,500.00 per month.  This **includes four percentannual rental increase** as well as proportionate taxes over thebase year.

 

*Security will increase to a total of $4,255.00.  Two months for the original space and onemonth for the additional space.*

 

 
| ACCEPTED: | /s/ Herbert Lindo, President             |   | DATED: | August 12, 2003 |   |
|-----------|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------|--------|
|      | KENILWORTH SYSTEMS INC {TENANT}          |
|      |                                     |
|      |                                     |
| ACCEPTED: | /s/ Pete Owens, Agent for Landlord       |   | DATED: | August 12, 2003 |   |
|      | NASSAU COUNTY P>B>A> {LANDLORD} |

 

 

499 Jericho Tpke. * Mineola, New York 11501

Tel: 516-294-0010 * 1-888-303-3847 * Fax: 516-294-1278

www.owensbrokerage.com

 

----
§ 1952.11 Kentucky. ( a ) The Kentucky State plan received initial approval on July 31, 1973.
( b ) The Kentucky State plan received final approval on June 13, 1985.
( c ) Under the terms of the 1978 Court Order in *AFL-CIO* v. *Marshall,* compliance staffing levels (benchmarks) necessary for a “fully effective” enforcement program were required to be established for each State operating an approved State plan. In September 1984 Kentucky, in conjunction with OSHA, completed a reassessment of the levels initially established in 1980 and proposed revised compliance staffing benchmarks of 23 safety and 14 health compliance officers. After opportunity for public comment and service on the AFL-CIO, the Assistant Secretary approved these revised staffing requirements on June 13, 1985.
( d ) The plan covers all private-sector employers and employees, with several notable exceptions, as well as State and local government employers and employees, within the State. For current information on these exceptions and for additional details about the plan, please visit *http://www.osha.gov/dcsp/osp/stateprogs/kentucky.html .*
§ 19.4 Contents of request. The formal written request shall be in the form of a letter or memorandum to an appropriate official of the financial institution from which financial records are requested. The request shall be signed by an issuing official of the requesting Departmental unit, as specified in § 19.3(c). It shall set forth that official's name, title, business address and business phone number. The request shall also contain the following: ( a ) The identity of the customer or customers to whom the records pertain;
( b ) A reasonable description of the records sought;
( c ) Any other information that the issuing official deems appropriate, e.g., the date on which the requesting Departmental unit expects to present a certificate of compliance with the applicable provisions of the Act, the name and title of the individual to whom disclosure is to be made, etc.
( d ) In cases where customer notice is delayed by a court order, a copy of the court order shall be attached to the formal written request.
§ 1981.103 Filing of discrimination complaint. ( a ) Who may file. An employee who believes that he or she has been discriminated against by an employer in violation of the Act may file, or have filed by any person on the employee's behalf, a complaint alleging such discrimination.
( b ) Nature of filing. No particular form of complaint is required, except that a complaint must be in writing and should include a full statement of the acts and omissions, with pertinent dates, which are believed to constitute the violations.
( c ) Place of filing. The complaint should be filed with the OSHA Area Director responsible for enforcement activities in the geographical area where the employee resides or was employed, but may be filed with any OSHA officer or employee. Addresses and telephone numbers for these officials are set forth in local directories and at the following Internet address: *http://www.osha.gov .*
( d ) Time for filing. Within 180 days after an alleged violation of the Act occurs (*i.e.,* when the discriminatory decision has been both made and communicated to the complainant), an employee who believes that he or she has been discriminated against in violation of the Act may file, or have filed by any person on the employee's behalf, a complaint alleging such discrimination. The date of the postmark, facsimile transmittal, or e-mail communication will be considered to be the date of filing; if the complaint is filed in person, by hand-delivery or other means, the complaint is filed upon receipt.
( e ) Relationship to section 11(c) complaints. A complaint filed under the Pipeline Safety Act that alleges facts which would constitute a violation of section 11(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.S.C. 660(c), will be deemed to be a complaint filed under both the Pipeline Safety Act and section 11(c). Similarly, a complaint filed under section 11(c) that alleges facts that would constitute a violation of the Pipeline Safety Act will be deemed to be a complaint filed under both the Pipeline Safety Act and section 11(c). Normal procedures and timeliness requirements for investigations under the respective laws and regulations will be followed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Solely for the purposes of complying  with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of Fortune
Entertainment  Corporation,  that, to his knowledge, the quarterly report of the
company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005,  fully  complies with
the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the company's financial condition and results of operations.


August 18, 2005


/s/ Phillip Verrill
Phillip Verrill, Chief Financial Officer
#### HILL, ET AL. v. HARVARD CO.

(Decided November 16, 1916.)

Appeal from Washington Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Ben D. Turner.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on certificate.
[No. 48776-1-I.

Division One.

December 9, 2002.]

#### Greg Stonack, *Appellant,*v. Dean-Deily Company, L.L.C., *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 00-2-08323-8, Laura Gene Middaugh, J., entered June 8, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
§ 437.25 Flight test plan. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76727 , Sept. 19, 2024.
An applicant must— ( a ) Describe any flight test program, including estimated number of flights and key flight-safety events.
( b ) Identify and describe the geographic coordinates of the boundaries of one or more proposed operating areas where it plans to perform its flights and that satisfy § 437.57(b) of subpart C. The FAA may designate one or more exclusion areas in accordance with § 437.57(c) of subpart C.
( c ) For each operating area, provide the planned maximum altitude of the reusable suborbital rocket.
# Mark Shelton

October 5, 2015 ,, Department ofTransportation Federal Aviation Administration 

## BOO Independence Ave, SVV Washington, DC 20591
Gentlemen: .i ,,j

I, Mark 

### E. Shelton, am writing pursuanttothe 

### FAA Modernization andReformActof2012, Public Law 112-95 FEB.14, 2012, Section 

### 333 and the procedures contained within14C.F.R. 

### 11, request exemption from the Federal Aviation Regulations as specified, and furthermore seek exemption from the requirements of 14C.F.R. 

### §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) 

### & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) 

### & (b), to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System pursuant to Section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 (FMRA). This exemption request will permit Mark E.Shelton, as the owner and operatorof Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) forthe commercial purpose ofconducting aerial video and photography ofreal estate, to perform home and/or business exterior inspections, agricultural inspections, and general photography. I, asthe sole operators ofthe named UAS vehicles, consisting ofa DJJ Inspire PRO UAS and a DJJ Phantom 3 Pro UAS, maintain their uses will be forcommercial photographyand videofor hire ofreal estate photography, home and/or business exterior inspections, we.ddings..and**events~land** arutsurveyappraisals, and agricultural assessments on local farms. In addition to the many commercial uses, it is important to promote safe UAS operations and increase public knowledge of UAS's. The afore-mentioned aircraft are GPS assisted for location-based information, and include a "Return To Home" safetyfeature in the event ofsignal loss. I will personally perform all pre-flight and post-flight checks and system/vehicle maintenance. Flight logs will also be maintained and kept current. Allflights will be L.O.S., and Iwill utilize a spotter, and will maintain less than 400' A.G.L. The Inspire Pro 1 aircraft weighs 6.5 lbs; the Phantom Pro 3 weighs 3 lbs. Both are batteryoperated, which are quieterso as notto disrupt the public's right of "quiet enjoyment" in neighborhoods and near businesses. Additionally, both aircraft have a safetyfeature integrated in the software which prohibits itfrom starting up the motors within a certain distance ofClass A/B/C airspace. I am an experienced pilotwith morethan 25 years experience with radio controlled helicopters, and 3 years experience with multirotors. I am also a private pilot knowledgeable ofsafetyand current F.A.R.'s. Additionally, I built and certified an experimental helicopter (EAB), Rotorway 162F. The use ofthese aircraft is financiallyviable, as the costto the consumer is much Jess than hiring a full size aircraft and pilot. The UAS's are safer in that theycan traverse areas a full size aircraft cannot. For home inspections, the UAS also allows for a total roof

.inspection without**the-need~**to physicallyclimb structures,-creatlnga saferarrd less costly opti!Yn to 

### the·client Thank you in advance for your consideration as I look forward to your response. Verytruly yours,



# Mark E. 

# if
( 

# Shelton
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
 AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
 ACTION: Notice of issuance of Letters of Authorization to take marine mammals incidental to oil and gas industry activities.
 SUMMARY: In accordance with section 101(a)(5)(A) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service implementing regulations [50 CFR 18.27(f)(3)], notice is hereby given that Letters of Authorization to take polar bears and Pacific walrus incidental to oil and gas industry exploration, development, and production activities have been issued to the following companies: Company
Activity
Date issuedBP Exploration (Prudhoe Bay Unit)
Production
April 21, 2000.BP Exploration (Kuparuk Unit)
Production
April 21, 2000.Western Geophysical (Anadarko)
Exploration
April 21, 2000.( print page 31594)BP Exploration (Northstar)
Development
May 3, 2000.ARCO Alaska, Inc. (Meltwater North)
Exploration
May 3, 2000.ARCO Alaska, Inc. (Spark # 1)
Exploration
May 3, 2000.ARCO Alaska, Inc. (Rendezvous A&B)
Exploration
May 3, 2000.ARCO Alaska, Inc. (Lookout A)
Exploration
May 3, 2000.ARCO Alaska, Inc. (Moose's Tooth A&C)
Exploration
May 3, 2000.ARCO Alaska, Inc. (Clover A&B)
Exploration
May 3, 2000.ARCO Alaska, Inc. (Cairn)
Exploration
May 3, 2000.Western Geophysical (ARCO)
Exploration
May 3, 2000.Western Geophysical (BP Exploration)
Exploration
May 3, 2000.Kuukpik/Fairweather Geophysical
Exploration
May 3, 2000.BP Exploration (Point Thomson)
Exploration
May 3, 2000.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John W. Bridges at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Marine Mammals Management Office, 1011 East Tudor Road, Anchorage, Alaska 99503, (300) 362-5148 or (907) 786-3810.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Letters of Authorization were issued in accordance with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Federal Rules and Regulations “Marine Mammals; Incidental Take During Specified Activities (65 FR 16828; March 30, 2000).” Dated: May 8, 2000. Mike Boylan, Acting Deputy Regional Director.


[FR Doc. 00-12527  Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
§ 1989.100 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part sets forth procedures for, and interpretations of, section 1405(b) of the Taxpayer First Act (TFA), Public Law 116-25, 133 Stat. 981 (July 1, 2019) (codified at 26 U.S.C. 7623(d)). TFA provides for employee protection from retaliation because the employee has engaged in protected activity pertaining to underpayment of tax or any conduct which the employee reasonably believes constitutes a violation of the internal revenue laws or any provision of Federal law relating to tax fraud.
( b ) This part establishes procedures under TFA for the expeditious handling of retaliation complaints filed by employees, or by persons acting on their behalf. These rules, together with those codified at 29 CFR part 18, set forth the procedures under TFA for submission of complaints, investigations, issuance of findings and preliminary orders, objections to findings and orders, litigation before administrative law judges (ALJs), post-hearing administrative review, and withdrawals and settlements. In addition, these rules provide the Secretary's interpretations on certain statutory issues.