*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 02-20318

_____________________

COLISEUM FORD INC

Plaintiff-Counter Defendant–Appellee,

v.

FORD DEALER COMPUTER SERVICES INC, also known as Dealer Computer

Services Inc

Defendant-Counter Claimant– Appellant

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. H-01-CV-2293

_________________________________________________________________

January 8, 2003

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DEMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ford Dealer Computer Services, Inc. (DCS) seeks to recover

damages from Coliseum Ford Inc. (Coliseum Ford) for breach of a

long-term computer contract (the Agreement). The Agreement

contains an arbitration clause which is set out below. DCS filed

an arbitration demand, following which Coliseum Ford filed an

application to stay arbitration in a Texas state district court. 
2

The suit was removed to federal district court, and DCS then

filed a motion to compel arbitration. The district court agreed

with Coliseum Ford that the dispute was not arbitrable and denied

DCS’s motion to compel arbitration. DCS appeals. We reverse.

Respectfully, we disagree with the district court’s

interpretation of the arbitration clause in the Agreement, which

reads as follows:

Except as provided otherwise in this Agreement, all

disputes, claims, controversies and other matters in

question between the parties to this Agreement, arising

out of, or relating to this Agreement, or to the breach

thereof, including any claim in which either party is

demanding monetary damages of the nature including

negligence, strict liability or intentional acts and

omissions by either party, and which cannot be resolved

by the parties, shall be settled by arbitration in

accordance with the arbitration procedure described

below. Collection of any accrued amounts owed by

Dealer to FDCS (and not disputed in writing with

specificity within a reasonable period from the invoice

date) shall not be subject to this arbitration

procedure. This arbitration procedure shall in no way

limit FDCS’ remedies as provided in Section 12.

As we read the clause, the sentence excepting from arbitration

collection of accrued amounts owed by Coliseum Ford to DCS is

designed to deal with the collection of undisputed amounts

regularly invoiced under the Agreement. The fact that it speaks

in terms of “collection,” “not disputed” and “invoice” supports

that interpretation. The clause is not designed to deal with

what is essentially a breach of contract claim, as to which the

amount of damages owing is disputed and which is not the subject

of an invoice.
3

Accordingly, we reverse the order of the district court

entered February 14, 2002 denying DCS’s motion to compel

arbitration and remand for entry of an order compelling

arbitration. Costs shall be borne by Coliseum Ford.

REVERSED.