alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 102.74 Complaint and formal proceedings.

If it appears to the Regional Director that the charge has merit, formal proceedings will be instituted in accordance with the procedures described in §§ 102.15 through 102.51, insofar as they are applicable, and insofar as they are not inconsistent with the provisions of this subpart. If it appears to the Regional Director that issuance of a complaint is not warranted, the Director will decline to issue a complaint, and the provisions of § 102.19, including the provisions for appeal to the General Counsel, are applicable unless an election has been directed under §§ 102.77 and 102.78, in which event the provisions of § 102.81 are applicable.

[82 FR 11764, Feb. 24, 2017]
# EUR-Lex - 31995F1127(02) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995F1127(02)

**Council Act of 26 July 1995 drawing up the Convention on the use of information technology for customs purposes **

*
Official Journal C 316 , 27/11/1995 P. 0033 - 0033 *

COUNCIL ACT of 26 July 1995 drawing up the Convention on the use of information technology for customs purposes (95/C 316/02)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article K.3 (2) (c) thereof,

Whereas for the purposes of achieving the objectives of the Union the Member States regard customs cooperation as a matter of common interest, coming under the cooperation provided for in Title VI of the Treaty;

HAVING DECIDED that the Convention, the text of which is given in the Annex and which has been signed today by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the Union, is hereby drawn up;

RECOMMENDS that it be adopted by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

Done at Brussels, 26 July 1995.

For the Council

The President

J. A. BELLOCH JULBE
#### § 2200.60 Notice of hearing; location.

Except by agreement of the parties, or in an expedited proceeding under § 2200.103, when a hearing is first set, the Judge shall give the parties and intervenors notice of the time, place, and nature of the hearing at least 30 days in advance of the hearing. If a hearing is being rescheduled, or if exigent circumstances are present, at least 10 days' notice shall be given. The Judge will designate a place and time of hearing that involves as little inconvenience and expense to the parties as is practicable.
#### THOMAS v. THE STATE.

(Decided January 30, 1917.)

Appeal from Bullock Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. J. S. Williams.

No counsel marked for appellant.

W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed on motion of Attorney General.
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Actuate Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter I. Cittadini, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 28, 2003



/s/    PETER I.
CITTADINI

---

Peter I. Cittadini

President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 1630.4 Discrimination prohibited. ( a ) *In general* — ( 1 ) It is unlawful for a covered entity to discriminate on the basis of disability against a qualified individual in regard to: ( i ) Recruitment, advertising, and job application procedures;
( ii ) Hiring, upgrading, promotion, award of tenure, demotion, transfer, layoff, termination, right of return from layoff, and rehiring;
( iii ) Rates of pay or any other form of compensation and changes in compensation;
( iv ) Job assignments, job classifications, organizational structures, position descriptions, lines of progression, and seniority lists;
( v ) Leaves of absence, sick leave, or any other leave;
( vi ) Fringe benefits available by virtue of employment, whether or not administered by the covered entity;
( vii ) Selection and financial support for training, including: apprenticeships, professional meetings, conferences and other related activities, and selection for leaves of absence to pursue training;
( viii ) Activities sponsored by a covered entity, including social and recreational programs; and
( ix ) Any other term, condition, or privilege of employment.
( 2 ) The term discrimination includes, but is not limited to, the acts described in §§ 1630.4 through 1630.13 of this part.
( b ) *Claims of no disability.* Nothing in this part shall provide the basis for a claim that an individual without a disability was subject to discrimination because of his lack of disability, including a claim that an individual with a disability was granted an accommodation that was denied to an individual without a disability.
[76 FR 17002, Mar. 25, 2011]
AALE6A

L 817963495 9 03/1 7 '1 0 08:1 0 NO.81 2 02/0 3

UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO

N FEDERA L AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
FEDERA L AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ,

Complainan

t V
. AMERICA

N EAGL E AIRLINES , INC. , Responden

t §

§ § § § § § § § FA A Civ U Penalt y 2007SW21037 7 and 2007SW21039 3 FA A Docke t No.CP09SW000 7 Administrativ e La

w Judg e Hon
. Richar dC
. Goodwi n e ; '~d > C D March 17,201 0 "^ ^ REQUES T T O WITHDRA W TH E REQUES T FO RA HEARIN G

AN D TH E ANSWE RT O TH E COMPLAIIVT : g PiiTsuan t to §13.215 , th e Respondent , b y counsel
. Request s t o Withdra w th e Reques t

fo r a Hearin g an

dth e Answe

r t o th e Complain

t cancelin g an

y hearin g se t

fo r thi s matter . The basi s o f thi s motio n i s tha

t th e Administrator

an dRespondent , throug h counsel , hav e reache d a settlement
. Respectfull

y submitte dth e 17t

h da y o f Marc h 2010
. America

n Eagl e Airlines , Inc
.

Franci s C
. Hei l Senio r Attorney fo

r America n Eagl e Airlines , Inc
. P.O
. Bo x 61961 6 Mai l Dro p 567 5 DF W Airport , T

X 75261-961 6 Telephone : 202-496-564 2 Facsimile : 202-496-566 0AALEGA

L 817963495 9 03/1 7 '1 0 08:1 0 NO.81 2 03/0 3
CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t today , March 17 , 2010, 1 hav e sen t by Facsimil e an

dU.S
. Mail th e foregoing Motio n t o Withdra w the Reques t

fo r aHearin g an dth e Answe

r t o th e Complain

t in th e matte r o f FA A v . America

n Eagl e Airlines , Inc. , to th e following :

ONE COP Y The Honorabl e Richar

dC
. Goodwin Administrativ e La

w Judg e Departmen

t o f Transportation , Rm
. £12-32 0 Office of Hearings , M-20 120 0 Ne w Jersey Avenue , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Telephone : 202-366-213 9 Facsimile : 202-366-753 6 Ren aPrice , Attorney Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Office o f th e Regiona

l Counsel (ASW-7 ) Southwes t Regio n Headquarter s 260 1 Meacha

mBlvd. , Rm
. 66 3 For t Worth , Texa s 7613 7 Telephone : 817-222-506 8 Facsimile : 817-222-594 5

ORIGINA L & ON

E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , SW Washington , D C 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke

t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building , Suit

e 2W1000 Facsimile : 202-493-514 2

Madeleine Hunte r fo r America n Eagl e Airlines , Inc
. Telephone : 817-967-123 7 Facsimile : 817-967-293 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheets for Elgrande.Com, Inc. (unaudited) at August 31,
2000 and the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(unaudited) for the period ended August 31, 2000, and is qualified in its
entirety by  reference to such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                         30,073
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              115,234
<PP&E>                                        706,284
<DEPRECIATION>                                231,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                679,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         878,840
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       13,099
<OTHER-SE>                                   (249,685)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  679,868
<SALES>                                        62,863
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               62,863
<CGS>                                         119,173
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 119,173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              491,097
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (548,553)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (548,553)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (548,553)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)








</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 31999D0439 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999D0439

**1999/439/EC: Council Decision of 17 May 1999 on the conclusion of the Agreement with the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters' association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis **

*
Official Journal L 176 , 10/07/1999 P. 0035 - 0035 *

COUNCIL DECISION

of 17 May 1999

on the conclusion of the Agreement with the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters' association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis

(1999/439/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Article 6(1) of the Protocol, annexed by the Treaty of Amsterdam to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community integrating the Schengen acquis into the framework of the European Union;

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Agreement with the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters' association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, including the Annexes, its Final Act, Declarations and the Exchanges of Letters annexed thereto are hereby approved.

The text of the acts referred to in the first subparagraph is attached to this Decision.

Done at Brussels, 17 May 1999.

For the Council

The President

J. FISCHER
§ 15.302 What procedures apply to these claims? ( a ) Claims involving the negligent acts or omissions of Job Corps students or Federal employees are claims under the FTCA and are determined under the procedures in subpart B of this part. FTCA claims must be forwarded to and decided by the responsible Solicitor's Office.
( b ) Claims involving loss or damage to persons or the personal property of Job Corps students are covered by the WIA, 29 U.S.C. 2897(b), which provides that the Secretary of Labor may adjust or settle claims for damages to a person or property of up to $1,500 if those claims are found to be a proper charge against the United States and are not cognizable under the FTCA.
#### § 0.737-5 Appointment of Examiner.

Whenever a notice of alleged violation has been issued and a hearing requested, the Under Secretary shall provide for the selection of a Department of Labor Administrative Law Judge, appointed in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 3105, to act as the Examiner with respect to the matter.
### Supporting Materials 

## #5 Technical Support Documents See Attachment: 

# + GRIC Air Quality TSDs
#### GROSS v STARK

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist, Lucas Co

No 2085.

Decided Jan. 14, 1929

F J McManus, Toledo, for Gross.

D L Beall, Toledo, for Stark.

RICHARDS, J

This instrument was signed bv both parties. and in view of the obligation imposed on the agent to list the property and to make efforts to find a purchaser, it was not a unilateral contract and was binding on both parties. Stark advertised the property for sale and took prospective purchasers to look at the property, but no sale was effected by him.

In October, 1926, the property was sold for Gross by an other agent. In February, 1927, Gross notified Stark of the cancellation of the sales agreement.

The contract contains a provision requiring, payment of the commission in the event of sale by the owner or any other person during the period of the agency.

In view of the terms of the contract and the unlimited and exclusive agency given to Stark, the owner was liable for the commission, and the verdict and judgment in favor of the real estate agent was justified.

Finding no prejudicial error, the judgment is affirmed.

Williams and Lloyd, JJ, concur.
#### § 2.7 Rulemaking.

It is the policy of the Secretary of Labor, that in applying the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553), the exemption therein for matters relating to public property, loans, grants, benefits or contracts shall not be relied upon as a reason for not complying with the notice and public participation requirements thereof except for all information-gathering procedures adopted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

[46 FR 35, Jan. 2, 1981]
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 
 Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Columbus McKinnon Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material  respects,  the  financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 Dated:  June 5, 2009
  
 /s/ Timothy T. TevensTimothy T. TevensChief Executive Officer/s/ Karen L. HowardKaren L. HowardChief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.1108 bis-Chloromethyl ether.

Note:

The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1003 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-1910.1003).

[[61 FR 31433](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31433), June 20, 1996]
§ 1625.23 Waivers of rights and claims: Tender back of consideration. ( a ) An individual alleging that a waiver agreement, covenant not to sue, or other equivalent arrangement was not knowing and voluntary under the ADEA is not required to tender back the consideration given for that agreement before filing either a lawsuit or a charge of discrimination with EEOC or any state or local fair employment practices agency acting as an EEOC referral agency for purposes of filing the charge with EEOC. Retention of consideration does not foreclose a challenge to any waiver agreement, covenant not to sue, or other equivalent arrangement; nor does the retention constitute the ratification of any waiver agreement, covenant not to sue, or other equivalent arrangement.
( b ) No ADEA waiver agreement, covenant not to sue, or other equivalent arrangement may impose any condition precedent, any penalty, or any other limitation adversely affecting any individual's right to challenge the agreement. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, provisions requiring employees to tender back consideration received, and provisions allowing employers to recover attorneys' fees and/or damages because of the filing of an ADEA suit. This rule is not intended to preclude employers from recovering attorneys' fees or costs specifically authorized under federal law.
( c ) *Restitution, recoupment, or setoff.* ( 1 ) Where an employee successfully challenges a waiver agreement, covenant not to sue, or other equivalent arrangement, and prevails on the merits of an ADEA claim, courts have the discretion to determine whether an employer is entitled to restitution, recoupment or setoff (hereinafter, “reduction”) against the employee's monetary award. A reduction never can exceed the amount recovered by the employee, or the consideration the employee received for signing the waiver agreement, covenant not to sue, or other equivalent arrangement, whichever is less.
( 2 ) In a case involving more than one plaintiff, any reduction must be applied on a plaintiff-by-plaintiff basis. No individual's award can be reduced based on the consideration received by any other person.
( d ) No employer may abrogate its duties to any signatory under a waiver agreement, covenant not to sue, or other equivalent arrangement, even if one or more of the signatories or the EEOC successfully challenges the validity of that agreement under the ADEA.
[65 FR 77446, Dec. 11, 2000]
§ 2200.55 Interrogatories. ( a ) *General.* At any time after the filing of the first responsive pleading or motion that delays the filing of an answer, such as a motion to dismiss, any party may serve interrogatories upon any other party. The number of interrogatories shall not exceed 25 questions, including subparts, except upon the agreement of the parties or by order of the Commission or the Judge. The party seeking to serve more than 25 questions, including subparts, shall have the burden of persuasion to establish that the complexity of the case or the number of citation items necessitates a greater number of interrogatories.
( b ) *Answers.* All answers shall be made in good faith and as completely as the answering party's information will permit. The answering party is required to make reasonable inquiry and ascertain readily obtainable information. An answering party may not give lack of information or knowledge as an answer or as a reason for failure to answer, unless the answering party states that it has made reasonable inquiry and that information known or readily obtainable by it is insufficient to enable it to answer the substance of the interrogatory.
( c ) *Procedure.* Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully under oath or affirmation. If the interrogatory is objected to, the objection shall be stated in lieu of the answer. The answers are to be signed by the person making them and the objections shall be signed by the party or its counsel. The party on whom the interrogatories have been served shall serve a copy of its answers or objections upon the propounding party within 30 days after the service of the interrogatories. The Judge may allow a shorter or longer time. The burden shall be on the party submitting the interrogatories to file a motion conforming to § 2200.40 for an order with respect to any objection or other failure to answer an interrogatory.
§ 1630.3 Exceptions to the definitions of “Disability” and “Qualified Individual with a Disability.” ( a ) The terms *disability* and *qualified individual with a disability* do not include individuals currently engaging in the illegal use of drugs, when the covered entity acts on the basis of such use. ( 1 ) *Drug* means a controlled substance, as defined in schedules I through V of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C 812)
( 2 ) *Illegal use of drugs* means the use of drugs the possession or distribution of which is unlawful under the Controlled Substances Act, as periodically updated by the Food and Drug Administration. This term does not include the use of a drug taken under the supervision of a licensed health care professional, or other uses authorized by the Controlled Substances Act or other provisions of Federal law.
( b ) However, the terms *disability* and *qualified* individual with a disability may not exclude an individual who: ( 1 ) Has successfully completed a supervised drug rehabilitation program and is no longer engaging in the illegal use of drugs, or has otherwise been rehabilitated successfully and is no longer engaging in the illegal use of drugs; or
( 2 ) Is participating in a supervised rehabilitation program and is no longer engaging in such use; or
( 3 ) Is erroneously regarded as engaging in such use, but is not engaging in such use.
( c ) It shall not be a violation of this part for a covered entity to adopt or administer reasonable policies or procedures, including but not limited to drug testing, designed to ensure that an individual described in paragraph (b) (1) or (2) of this section is no longer engaging in the illegal use of drugs. (See § 1630.16(c) Drug testing).
( d ) *Disability* does not include: ( 1 ) Transvestism, transsexualism, pedophilia, exhibitionism, voyeurism, gender identity disorders not resulting from physical impairments, or other sexual behavior disorders;
( 2 ) Compulsive gambling, kleptomania, or pyromania; or
( 3 ) Psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from current illegal use of drugs.
( e ) *Homosexuality and bisexuality* are not impairments and so are not disabilities as defined in this part.