alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BioKyowa, Inc. P.O. Box 1550 Cape Girardeau MO 63702-1550 Ph: (573) 335-4849 Fax: (573) 335-1466

The Honorable Ray LaHood United States Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 en 

### en Dear Secretary LaHood: OnbehalfofBioKyowaInc., I am writing to express our strong support for the applicationofDeltaAicLines for**~newnonstop-service** betweenDetroit andHaneda. Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, where· many corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. There are over 500 Japanese companies located in Michigan and hundreds more whose business models rely on access to Japan and it's market. The growth ofourbusiness ties withJapan has created demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Ourbusiness travelers look to the convenience offlying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia, and as an airport that can support trans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to make 

### it the airlines gateway to Asia. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit our business travelers. Thank you for consideration ofthis request.

"'ii-," , '

(, t , , ' I I>
#### STATE OF FLORIDA v GONZALEZ

Case No. 84-317 AC

Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Appellate Division, Dade County

November 25, 1986

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Jim Smith, Attorney General, and G. Bart Billbrought, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

Before SIMONS, BARAD, GOLDMAN, JJ.

*161OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of Section 316.193 F.S.

At the time the case was called for trial, the “speedy trial” period was extended due to illness of a State’s witness. The speedy trial period was once again extended at the second setting when the witness was still ill. On the last day at which the speedy trial period was to expire, the case again came on for trial. At this time, the witness was still unavailable and the State elected to proceed without him. The defense moved to discharge and dismiss the charges. The Court granted the motion.

We reverse the Order of Dismissal and remand for trial. Where the State elected to proceed to trial, it was error to dismiss the case, notwithstanding that a prosecution witness, whose absence had prompted an earlier request by the prosecution for a continuance, was still absent. See *State of Florida v. Carty,*14 Fla. Supp. 2d 143 (Cir. Ct. Dade 1985).

REVERSED AND REMANDED for trial.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Bureau highlights**
 
2013 | 2014 | 2015
 
SuDoc Number:I 27.1/6:
Item Number:0663-A-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000935606
 
April 2, 2018
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Aviation Security Advisory Committee.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held June 1, 2000, from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 10th floor, MacCracken Room, Washington, DC. 20591, telephone 202-267-7622.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. 11), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Aviation Security Advisory Committee to be held June 1, at the Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 10th floor, MacCracken Room, Washington, DC. The agenda for the meeting will include: State Fire Codes and the Impact in the Implementation of 14 CFR 107.14 Nationwide, Airport Construction Guidelines, Expansion of the List of Disqualifying Crimes in 14 CFR 108.33 and 107.31, Current Access Control Practices and Procedures, Screening of Persons with Disabilities, Status of Work Groups, and Security Initiatives. The June 1 meeting is open to the public but attendance is limited to space available. Members of the public may address the committee only with the written permission of the chair, which should be arranged in advance. The chair may entertain public comment if, in its judgment, doing so will not disrupt the orderly progress of the meeting and will not be unfair to any other person. Members of the public are welcome to present written material to the committee at any time. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the Office of the Associate Administrator for Civil Aviation Security, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, telephone 202-267-7622.

Issued in Washington, DC, on May 9, 2000.

William S. Davis,

Deputy Associate Administrator for Civil Aviation Security.

[FR Doc. 00-12173 Filed 5-12-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### American Pen Corp., Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[698 NYS2d 472]

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Esposito, J.), entered January 29, 1998, which dismissed the complaint for failure to file a notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e, unanimously modified, on the law, to sever and permit the first, second and fourth equitable causes of action to stand, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff alleges a continuing trespass by the accumulation of debris on property subject to an easement for the City-owned Melrose Avenue Bridge. The first, second and fourth causes of action in the complaint are equitable in nature (abatement of nuisance and injunctive relief), whereas the third and fifth causes seek $75,000,000 in treble damages and $2 million plus $20,000 per day as compensation for reasonable “use and occupancy” of the property, respectively.

The requirement to file a formal notice of claim with the municipality does not apply to an action in equity to restrain a continuing act, and to demands for money damages which are *88merely incidental to such equitable claims *(Dutcher v Town of Shandaken,*97 AD2d 922, 923; *Fontana v Town of Hempstead,*18 AD2d 1084, *affd*13 NY2d 1134). The multimillion dollar damage claims here are more than simply incidental to the equitable relief sought by plaintiff. The fact that the major portion of the complaint seeks equitable relief does not, in this instance, preserve the damage claims made without formal notice. Accordingly, the motion court was correct insofar as it dismissed the third and fifth causes of action. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Williams, Wallach, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.
#### § 389.12 Payment of fees and charges.

The fees charged for services and resources shall be paid for electronically at *http://www.pay.gov,* a secure government-wide collection portal, except for charges for reporting services that are performed under competitive bid contracts with non-Government firms. Fees for reporting are payable to the firms providing the services. Payments to *pay.gov* can be made directly from a bank account or by credit/debit card.
5 May 13, 2010

Pollutant

NAAQS

Promulgation Date

Designations

Effective

(approximate date)

Transport SIPs 

Due

(3 yrs after NAAQS 

promulgation)

At

Demo

PM2.5 (2006) Sept 2006 Nov 2009 Sept 2009 NCO May 2011 June 2013 May 2014 DPM2.5 (2011) Oct 2011 Dec 2013 Oct 2014 DNO2/SO2Secondary March 2012 April 2014 March 2015 OSO2 (primary) June 2010 July 2012 June 2013 JOzone Aug 2010 Aug 2011 (based on 2008-10 data) Aug 2013 D

(to 

Pb Oct 2008 Nov 2010/2011

(extra time for new monitors)

Oct 2011 

20

NO2 (primary) Jan 2010 Feb 2012 Jan 2013 A

Setting the NAAQS Is Just the Beginning...
March 2010 Response to Johnson M

May 2010 Tailoring Rule May 2010 CAIR Remand Response March 2011 NSPS for EGUs (anticipated

March 2011 Utility Toxic Controls 

Spring 2011 CAIR Remand Response November 2011 NSPS for EGUS (anticipated

November 2011 Utility Toxics Controls 

20112010EPA Air Regulations Affecting the Power 

Coordinating Reductions: Utility 

2011 - 2013 BART Determinations
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WENDY TRAVER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 08-15707

D.C. No. 4:05-CV-00319-CKJ

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2010** 

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. 

Wendy Traver appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in

favor of the Tucson Unified School District in her employment action alleging

FILED

APR 20 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-15707

retaliation in violation of Title VII, the Equal Pay Act (“EPA”), and the First

Amendment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo,

Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, 349 F.3d 634, 639 (9th Cir. 2003), and we

affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on the Title VII and

EPA claims because Traver’s request for additional pay was not a protected

activity under either statute. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2, -3 (prohibiting retaliation

for opposing employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or

national origin); 29 U.S.C. §§ 206(d), 215(a)(3) (prohibiting retaliation for

complaints regarding unlawful pay practices such as paying different wages to

employees on the basis of sex); Lambert v. Ackerley, 180 F.3d 997, 1007 (9th Cir.

1999) (en banc) (“[N]ot all amorphous expressions of discontent related to wages

and hours constitute complaints filed within the meaning of § 215(a)(3).”). 

Similarly, the district court properly granted summary judgment on the First

Amendment claim because Traver’s request for additional pay was not

constitutionally protected as it did not touch on a matter of public concern. See

Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 146 (1983) (“When employee expression cannot

be fairly considered as relating to any matter of political, social, or other concern to

the community, government officials should enjoy wide latitude in managing their
3 08-15707

offices, without intrusive oversight by the judiciary in the name of the First

Amendment.”). 

The district court also properly granted summary judgment on these claims

because Traver failed to raise a triable issue as to whether her termination was

causally connected to filing her prior lawsuit. See Cohen v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 686

F.2d 793, 797 (9th Cir. 1982) (stating that the decision maker’s unawareness of the

protected activity “breaks the requisite causal link”).

Traver’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. 

AFFIRMED.
§ 22.14 Separation of functions. ( a ) The investigating official, the reviewing official, and any employee or agent of the authority who takes part in investigating, preparing, or presenting a particular case may not, in such case or a factually related case— ( 1 ) Participate in the hearing as the ALJ;
( 2 ) Participate or advise in the initial decision or the review of the initial decision by the ARB, except as a witness or a representative in public proceedings; or
( 3 ) Make the collection of penalties and assessments under 31 U.S.C. 3806.
( b ) The ALJ shall not be responsible to, or subject to the supervision or direction of the investigating official or the reviewing official.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, the representative for the Government may be employed anywhere in the authority, including in the offices of either the investigating official or the reviewing official.
[52 FR 48492, Dec. 22, 1987, as amended at 86 FR 1781, Jan. 11, 2021]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [Report No. 2410]

                    Petitions for Reconsideration have been filed in the Commission's rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of these documents are available for viewing and copying in Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to these petitions must be filed by June 2, 2000. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time of filing oppositions has expired.                          ( print page 31553)    

*Subject:*                     Implementation of the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act of 1999 (CS Docket No. 99-363).                

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     2.                

Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-12498 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10Q QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                      65,092,113
<SECURITIES>                                26,741,261
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,747,482
<ALLOWANCES>                                   840,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           107,591,259
<PP&E>                                       2,267,358
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             132,363,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,259,583
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,416
<OTHER-SE>                                 107,669,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               132,363,626
<SALES>                                     26,691,087
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            51,033,027
<CGS>                                        2,071,094
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               38,355,054
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,929,985
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,296,584
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,633,401
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,633,401
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34


</TABLE>
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3465 — Syngenta CP / Advanta)

(2004/C 177/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.1003 Overhead protection for operators of agricultural and industrial tractors used in construction. ( a ) *General.* This section sets forth requirements for overhead protection used to protect operators of wheel-type agricultural and industrial tractors used in construction work that will minimize the possibility of operator injury resulting from overhead objects such as flying or falling objection, and from the cover itself in the event of accidental upset.
( b ) *Equipment manufactured before* July 15, 2019. When overhead protection is provided on wheel-type agricultural and industrial tractors manufactured before July 15, 2019, the overhead protection shall be designed and installed according to the requirements contained in the test and performance requirements of Society of Automotive Engineers Standard J167, Protective Frame with Overhead Protection-Test Procedures and Performance Requirements, which pertains to overhead protection requirements (incorporated by reference, see § 1926.6) or comply with the consensus standard (ISO 27850:2013) listed in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Equipment manufactured on or after* July 15, 2019. When overhead protection is provided on wheel-type agricultural and industrial tractors manufactured on or after July 15, 2019, the overhead protection shall be designed and installed according to the requirements contained in the test and performance requirements of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard ISO 27850:2013, Tractors for agriculture and forestry—Falling object protective structures—Test procedures and performance requirements, which pertains to overhead protection requirements (incorporated by reference, see § 1926.6).
( d ) *Site clearing.* In the case of machines to which § 1926.604 (relating to site clearing) also applies, the overhead protection may be either the type of protection provided in § 1926.604, or the type of protection provided by this section.
[84 FR 21578, May 14, 2019]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-37,553]

                    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on April 10, 2000, in response to a petition filed on the same date on behalf of workers at Swank, Inc., Attleboro, Massachusetts.                          ( print page 31606)    

The petitioning group of workers are covered by an existing certification issued on April 30, 2000 (TA-W-37,531). Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and this investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 5th day of May, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-12509 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M