alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4888 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4888

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs from transmitting certain information to the 
    Department of Justice for use by the national instant criminal 
                        background check system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 10, 2020

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs from transmitting certain information to the 
    Department of Justice for use by the national instant criminal 
                        background check system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TRANSMITTAL OF 
              CERTAIN INFORMATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR USE 
              BY THE NATIONAL INSTANT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 55 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 5501A the following new section:
``Sec. 5501B. Prohibition on transmittal of certain information to the 
              Department of Justice for use by the national instant 
              criminal background check system
    ``The Secretary may not transmit to any entity in the Department of 
Justice, for use by the national instant criminal background check 
system established under section 103 of the Brady Handgun Violence 
Prevention Act (34 U.S.C. 40901), personally identifiable information 
of a beneficiary, solely on the basis of a determination by the 
Secretary to pay benefits to a fiduciary for the use and benefit of the 
beneficiary under section 5502 of this title, without the order or 
finding of a judge, magistrate, or other judicial authority of 
competent jurisdiction that such beneficiary is a danger to themselves 
or others.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 55 of such title is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to section 5501A the following new item:

``5501B. Prohibition on transmittal of certain information to the 
                            Department of Justice for use by the 
                            national instant criminal background check 
                            system.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1614.701 Purpose and scope.

This subpart implements Title III of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (No FEAR Act), Pub. L. 107-174. It sets forth the basic responsibilities of Federal agencies and the Commission to post certain information on their public Web sites.
Order entered October 19, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00852-CR

HECTOR MANUEL CARREON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17-11409-Q

ORDER

On October 15, 2020, the clerk’s office filed a supplemental clerk’s record, 

followed within twenty-eight minutes, by a corrected supplemental clerk’s record. 

We STRIKE the supplemental clerk’s record filed at 2:47 p.m. on October 15, 

2020.

Before the Court is appellant’s pro se request for an extension of time to file 

his pro se response. We GRANT the request and ORDER appellant’s pro se 

response filed by January 12, 2021.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMRY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ISSUER'S
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND ITS CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, SET FORTH IN THE
ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             253
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,546
<ALLOWANCES>                                       317
<INVENTORY>                                      4,799
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,603
<PP&E>                                          37,670
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,510
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,403
<BONDS>                                         10,753
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           819
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,553
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,709
<SALES>                                         45,058
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,058
<CGS>                                           33,185
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 729
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,432
<INCOME-TAX>                                       635
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                797
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       797
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12


</TABLE>
EX-10.7






Exhibit 10.7




Summary of the Oral Agreements between

China Medstar Pte. Ltd. and Dr. Zheng Cheng



From December 31, 2004 to December 31, 2007, Dr. Zheng Cheng agreed to provide to China Medstar
Limited, the predecessor entity of China Medstar Pte. Ltd., loans in the aggregate amount of
264,094.6 Singapore Dollars. The loans were agreed to be used for the payment of certain fees
incurred in relation to the initial public offering of China Medstar Limited on the Alternative
Investment Market of the London Stock Exchange. The loans were unsecured, interest free and
repayable on demand.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Export Trading Company Act of 1982

              														Export Trading Company Act of 1982, October 8, 1982.						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1023,			accessed on September 5, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
EXHIBIT 21


                KERR-McGEE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES


                                  SUBSIDIARIES



                                       State or Country  Percent
        Name of Subsidiary             of Incorporation   Owned

Kerr-McGee Canada Ltd.                     Canada         100%
Kerr-McGee Chemical Corporation            Delaware       100%
Kerr-McGee China Petroleum Ltd.            Bahamas        100%
Kerr-McGee Coal Corporation                Delaware       100%
Kerr-McGee Credit Corporation              Delaware       100%
Kerr-McGee Oil (U.K.) PLC                  England        100%


    A number of additional subsidiaries are omitted since,
considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, they would not
constitute a significant subsidiary as of December 31, 1995.

<PAGE>
#### § 1918.68 Grounding.

The frames of portable electrical equipment and tools, other than double insulated tools and battery operated tools, shall be grounded through a separate equipment conductor run with or enclosing the circuit conductors.
# AGENCY:

 Merit Systems Protection Board. 

# ACTION:

 Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                         In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501*et. seq.*), this notice announces that the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) request for a three year reinstatement of its expired Generic Clearance Request for Voluntary Customer Surveys Under Executive Order 12862 “Setting Customer Service Standards” has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment.                     

In this regard, we are soliciting comments on the public reporting burden. The reporting burden for the collection of information on this form is estimated to vary from 10 minutes to 30 minutes per response, with an average of 15 minutes, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. 

Send comments regarding the burden estimate, or any other aspect of the information collection, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the address shown below. Please refer to OMB Control No. 3124-0012 in any correspondence. 

# DATES:

 Comments must be received on or before February 22, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

 Comments concerning the paperwork burden should also be addressed to Mr. Bruce Mayor, Merit Systems Protection Board, 1120 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20419 or by calling (202) 653-8900 and to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for MSPB, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503. 

Dated: January 13, 2000. 

Robert E. Taylor, 

Clerk of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-1256 Filed 1-19-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLIING CODE 7400-01-U
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 17, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31283-31288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12425]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Parts 600 and 660

[Docket No. 991223347-9347; I.D. 042600B]


Fisheries off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific; 
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Trip Limit Adjustments

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Fishing restrictions; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document clarifies tables 2,3,4, and 5 for Pacific Coast 
groundfish species and trip limits that were published in the Federal 
Register on May 4, 2000.

DATES: Effective 0001 hours local time May 1, 2000 (May 16, 2000 for 
the ``B'' platoon), unless modified, superseded or rescinded, until the 
effective date of the 2001 annual specifications and management 
measures for the Pacific Coast groundfish fishery, which will be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine King or Yvonne deReynier, 
Northwest Region, NMFS, 206-526-6140.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 4, 2000, at 65 FR 25881, NMFS 
announced changes to trip limits in the Pacific Coast groundfish 
fishery. Tables 2, 3, 4, and 5 are being republished in a logical and 
readable format.
    In Section IV, tables 2, 3, 4, and 5 are republished as follows:

BILLING CODE 3510-22-F

[[Page 31284]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR17MY00.015


[[Page 31285]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR17MY00.016


[[Page 31286]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR17MY00.017


[[Page 31287]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR17MY00.018



[[Page 31288]]


    Dated: May 11, 2000.
Bruce C. Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 00-12425 Filed 5-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-C
#### Ernest J. Pirman et al., Appellants and Respondents, *v.*Harold T. Confer et al., Respondents and Appellants.

Submitted May 17, 1937;

decided May 25, 1937.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 273 N. Y. 357.)
[No. 20324-7-III.

Division Three.

December 5, 2002.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Cheryl A. Strang-Phillips, *Respondent,*and Larry L. Phillips, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 99-3-00238-3, Linda G. Tompkins, J., entered July 3, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kato, J., concurred in by Brown, C.J.; Kurtz, J., dissenting.
#### POWELL et v JAFFE et

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9583.

Decided March 11, 1929

M S Farmer, Cleveland, for Powell.

Robert L Clark, for Jaffe, et.

Judges RICHARDS and WILLIAMS of the 6th Dist sitting in place of Judges LEVINE and SULLIVAN of the 8th Dist.

WILLIAMS, J.

This section was enacted for the public safety and a violation of it would be negligence per se. Schell vs. DuBois, 94 Ohio St., 93. If the dumb waiter had been fully fireproof at the bottom and the walls of the shaft made of plaster and metal laths, the fire starting in the basement would not have been communicated to the shaft and a fire originating in the shaft would have expended itself by consuming the paper therein.

We think there is also evidence tending to show negligence of the owners in permitting the accumulation of waste paper in the shaft and that such negligence was a proximate cause of plaintiffs’ damage. The accumulation of large quantities of inflammable waste material in the basement of a building is not necessarily actionable negligence, but if such accumulation constitutes a fire hazard and the surrounding circumstances are such that it may reasonably be anticipated that the inflammable material will catch fire, the owners of the building, by permitting inflammable waste materials to so accumulate would be guilty of negligence and liable for damage directly caused to the property of tenants in the building by such negligence.

For the reasons given the court erred in directing *a*verdict in favor of the defendants, to the prejudice of plaintiffs in error.

For the reasons given the .judgment of the court below is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial.

Vickery and Richards, JJ, concur.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 29, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-30274

Summary Calendar

 

In The Matter Of: CHARLES DUPRE,

Debtor.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

CHARLES DUPRE,

Appellant,

versus

MARTIN A. SCHOTT,

Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Middle District of Louisiana

(USDC No. 3:03-CV-68)

_________________________________________________________

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
2

Reviewing under the same standard as the district court, we affirm the Bankruptcy

Court’s denial of debtor’s discharge under 11 U.S.C. §§ 727(a)(2) and (4) for the

following reasons:

1. Because there is significant record evidence that Dupre knowingly failed to

make a full and complete disclosure of his assets, we find no clear error in

the Bankruptcy Court’s findings of fact supporting denial of discharge

under both subsections. 

2. Specifically, we find the cumulation of Dupre’s repeated schedule

omissions and inconsistent testimony regarding the ownership and

possession of certain assets to evidence a pattern of disregard for the truth

that supports fraudulent intent. See In re Sholdra, 249 F.3d 380, 382-83

(5th Cir. 2001) (finding that the cumulative effect of a series of falsehoods

in a bankruptcy proceeding indicates a pattern of “reckless and cavalier

disregard for the truth” supporting fraudulent intent). 

3. We find no clear error in the Bankruptcy Court’s rejection of Dupre’s

reliance on counsel as a valid defense to his omission of assets from the

schedules. 

4. Specifically, there is record evidence that Dupre did not make a full

disclosure of all pertinent facts about his assets to his attorney. See

Dillworth v. Boothe, 69 F.2d 621, 623 (5th Cir. 1934) (stating that a

reliance-on-counsel defense to asset omission requires full disclosure to the
3

attorney). Further, Dupre’s statements during the trustee’s inventory and

his trial testimony belie his claim of ignorance as to the ownership of

marital assets. Finally, even after learning of his obligation to report certain

property, Dupre failed to include property in his amended schedules. 

Because of Dupre’s failure to fully inform his attorney, his inconsistent

statements regarding asset ownership, his persistent omissions, and his

previous experience with bankruptcy proceedings, Dupre’s claim of

reliance on counsel is neither reasonable nor credible. 

Affirmed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 57 FR 31451, July 16, 1992.

#### § 20.90 Responsibilities of the Chief Financial Officer.

The Chief Financial Officer, or his or her designee, shall provide appropriate and binding written or other guidance to Department of Labor agencies and officials in carrying out this subpart, including the issuance of guidelines and instructions, which he or she may deem appropriate. The Chief Financial Officer shall also take such administrative steps as may be appropriate to carry out the purposes and ensure the effective implementation of this subpart.
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of North American Galvanizing & Coatings,
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the
undersigned hereby certifies in his or her capacity as an officer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his or her knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material
      respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
      Company.












NORTH AMERICAN GALVANIZING
& COATINGS, INC. (Registrant)











/s/ Ronald J.
Evans


Ronald J.
Evans


President
and Chief Executive Officer








/s/ Beth B.
Hood


Beth B.
Hood


Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer





February
20, 2009
#### In the Matter of Mary A. Santamour-Tartaglia, Respondent, v Anthony J. Venettozzi, Appellant.

(Appeal No. *8341.)

[701 NYS2d 765]

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Oneida County Family Court, Flemma, J.H.O. (Appeal from Order of Oneida County Family Court, Flemma, J.H.O. — Custody.) Present — Denman, P. J., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Balio, JJ.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  Exhibit 10.13A

                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
           REESTABLISHED RETIREMENT PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF 
                        KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

     WHEREAS, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (the "Company") maintains the
Reestablished Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees of Kewaunee Scientific
Corporation (the "Plan");

     WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated in its entirety effective May 1,
1989; and

     WHEREAS, the Company now wishes to amend the Plan;

     NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority reserved to the Company under
Section 12.2, the Plan be and hereby is amended, effective May 1, 1989, in the
following particulars:

     1.   Section 6.2(a) is amended by adding the following as new paragraphs at
the end:

     "Participants on April 30, 1985 will receive the larger of the benefit
described above or one percent of Final Average Compensation times Years of
Credited Service.

     Notwithstanding the foregoing, a participant's or prior plan participant's
benefit amount as determined above shall be offset by the value of the benefit
distributed to or on behalf of the participant from the prior plan, if any."

     2.   The first paragraph of Section 6.2(b) is amended to read as follows:

     "The Accrued Benefit of a Participant who either was a Participant and had
an Accrued Benefit on the Effective Date, or whose Final Average Compensation
includes years prior to May 1, 1994 in which his compensation exceeded $200,000
(as adjusted) for plan years prior to January 1, 1994 or $150,000 for plan years
beginning on or after January 1, 1994, or both, shall be determined as follows:"
EXHIBIT 32.2
   (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is
attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
  /s/ David F. HoffmeisterDavid F. HoffmeisterChief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Life Technologies and will be retained by Life Technologies and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Kyocera Corporation
(the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 4, 2007



/s/ Masahiro UmemuraName:

Masahiro UmemuraTitle:

Vice Chairman and Representative
Director(Principal Financial Officer)