alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1988.112 Judicial review. ( a ) Within 60 days after the issuance of a final order (including a decision issued by the Secretary upon his or her discretionary review) for which judicial review is available, any person adversely affected or aggrieved by the order may file a petition for review of the order in the United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which the violation allegedly occurred or the circuit in which the complainant resided on the date of the violation.
( b ) A final order is not subject to judicial review in any criminal or other civil proceeding.
( c ) If a timely petition for review is filed, the record of a case, including the record of proceedings before the ALJ, will be transmitted by the ARB or the ALJ, as the case may be, to the appropriate court pursuant to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the local rules of such court.
[81 FR 13984, Mar. 16, 2016, as amended at 85 FR 30627, May 20, 2020]
## 1999 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

11-26-1999 

# M edic al P r ot ec t i

ve v W a tk ins

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : D ocke t 98-7515

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1999

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1999 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du

. 

## Re c omme nde d C it a t ion

" M e d ical P r ot e ct iv e v W

a tkin s " (1999). 1999 D e cisio n s . P ape r 311. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1999/311

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 98-7515 Medical Protective Co. v. Watkins

The following modifications have been made to t he Court's Opinion issued on 11/26/99, to the above-entitled a ppeal and will appear as part of the final version of the opi nion:

Please notify the publisher of our request to make a correction to the above opinion by replacing the word Walski's wi th the word Walskis' on page seven (7), line 2.

Very truly yours,
/s/ P. Douglas Sisk, Clerk

Dated: November 29, 1999
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ 

From: Kenneth Winder [mailto:kwinder@mleainc.com]  

Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 8:37 PM

To: Richard Parker

Cc: phopkinson@hvolt.com; Aaron.Meyers@cooperindustries.com;

adelaski@standardsasap.org; ahofmann@publicpower.org; Aris Marantan;

artrosenfeld@gmail.com; august.esch@gmail.com; BermanEconomics@gmail.com; Brian

Coffey; bruce.r.hirsch@bge.com; bsmith@federalpacific.com; cabolduc@lbl.gov;

Caitlin Johnson; carlos.gaytan@ge.com; carlosgsiqueiros@eaton.com;

chad.kennedy@us.schneider‐electric.com; charlied@uus.org;

chuck.simmons@pgnmail.com; clark.silcox@nema.org; cstephens@neea.org;

Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov; dave.millure@metglas.com; DYoung@energy‐solution.com;

eduardorobles@eaton.com; Eric.Petersen@aksteel.com; gbf1@pge.com;

gjrosenquist@lbl.gov; greg.coulter405@gmail.com; James.Lass@cleco.com;

Jennifer.Tiedeman@hq.doe.gov; Jeremiah.Freeman@ee.doe.gov;

jerry.corkran@cooperindustries.com; jerry.schoen@aksteel.com; jhodge@howard‐

ind.com; Jim.creevy@nema.org; Jim.Raba@ee.doe.gov; jmauer@standardsasap.org;

john.caskey@nema.org; john.cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov; jrossetti@mlgw.org;

kcoughlin@lbl.gov; maheshsampat@bellsouth.net; mark.stoering@xcelenergy.com;

Matthew Nardotti; maxinesavitz@aol.com; mhyland@appanet.org; Michael Rivest;

mwaltner@nrdc.org; Paul.Ryan@hitmet.com; phil@pjharter.com;

pkumar@publicpower.org; Raymond.Polinski@atimetals.com;

rgreeson@federalpacific.com; richardparkerdc@gmail.com; rick.anderson@faypwc.com;

robert.saint@nreca.coop; robert.vanbuskirk@ee.doe.gov; rroy@nrdc.org;

ScottB@lvmetals.com; snadel@aceee.org; srosenstock@eei.org;

tballo@earthjustice.org; Teckman@nwcouncil.org; thomas.patzner@us.schneider‐

electric.com; vijay.tendulkar@onyxpower.com; Zhimei Luo; Chris Boulduc; Ken

Winder

Subject: Replacement Cost for Transformer Pole

Richard and Committee:

     Attached is a spreadsheet showing the cost to replace an existing pole in a

three‐phase distribution circuit with an existing single‐phase distribution

transformer mounted on it.  This information was developed to estimate the cost

to replace an existing pole with a new, higher strength pole required because of

the increased weight of the distribution transformer.  This estimate represents

the cost to do this for my Cooperative.

     Other Utilities will be furnishing this information for their systems.

Kenneth A. Winder, PE
#### § 1987.113 Judicial enforcement.

Whenever any person has failed to comply with a preliminary order of reinstatement, or a final order, including one approving a settlement agreement, issued under FSMA, the Secretary may file a civil action seeking enforcement of the order in the United States district court for the district in which the violation was found to have occurred or in the United States district court for the District of Columbia. Whenever any person has failed to comply with a preliminary order of reinstatement, or a final order, including one approving a settlement agreement, issued under FSMA, a person on whose behalf the order was issued may file a civil action seeking enforcement of the order in the appropriate United States district court.
§ 91.535 Stowage of food, beverage, and passenger service equipment during aircraft movement on the surface, takeoff, and landing. ( a ) No operator may move an aircraft on the surface, take off, or land when any food, beverage, or tableware furnished by the operator is located at any passenger seat.
( b ) No operator may move an aircraft on the surface, take off, or land unless each food and beverage tray and seat back tray table is secured in its stowed position.
( c ) No operator may permit an aircraft to move on the surface, take off, or land unless each passenger serving cart is secured in its stowed position.
( d ) No operator may permit an aircraft to move on the surface, take off, or land unless each movie screen that extends into the aisle is stowed.
( e ) Each passenger shall comply with instructions given by a crewmember with regard to compliance with this section.
[Doc. No. 26142, 57 FR 42672, Sept. 15, 1992]
§ 22.47 Limitations. ( a ) The notice of hearing (under § 22.12) with respect to a claim or statement must be served in the manner specified in § 22.8 within 6 years after the date on which such claim or statement is made.
( b ) If the defendant fails to file a timely answer, service of a notice under § 22.10(b) shall be deemed a notice of hearing for purposes of this section.
( c ) The statute of limitations may be extended by agreement of the parties.
# A-1 QA WQ

# A-2 QA Algae

# A-3 QA Zoo
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LETICIA RODARTE,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-73650

Agency No. A097-867-602

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Leticia Rodarte, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to

reconsider and reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8

U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen

FILED

OCT 13 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-73650

or reconsider, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we

review de novo claims of constitutional violations in immigration proceedings,

Ram v. INS, 243 F.3d 510, 516 (9th Cir. 2001). We dismiss in part and deny in

part the petition for review.

In her opening brief, Rodarte fails to address, and therefore has waived any

challenge to, the BIA’s determination that her motion to reconsider was untimely.

See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not

specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Rodarte’s motion to reopen,

because the BIA considered the evidence she submitted and acted within its broad

discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening. 

See Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (BIA’s denial of a motion to

reopen shall be reversed if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law”). 

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that

Rodarte failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying

relative. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).

Finally, we are not persuaded that Rodarte’s removal results in the

deprivation of her children’s rights. See Cabrera-Alvarez v. Gonzales, 423 F.3d

1006, 1012-13 (9th Cir. 2005).
3 08-73650

Rodarte’s remaining contentions lack merit.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

I, Donald C. White, the Chief Financial Officer of Intrepid Capital Corporation
(the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

         1.       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
                  quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 12, 2003

                                    By: /s/ Donald C. White
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Donald C. White, Chief Financial Officer
[Crim. No. 723.

First Appellate District.

January 9, 1918.]

#### In the Matter of the Application of ISRAEL WEINBERG for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Criminal Law-—Murder — Admission to Bail.—Application denied and petitioner remanded on authority of *Ex parte Bena Mooney, ante,*p. *797:*

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to obtain admission to bail.

The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in *Ex parte Bena Mooney, ante,*p. 797.

Maxwell McNutt, and Edwin V. McKenzie, for Petitioner.

C.M. Fickert, District Attorney, and Louis Ferrari, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

The defendant is restrained of his liberty under a bench warrant issued out of the superior court of the state of California in and for the city and county of San Francisco, upon eight separate indictments presented by the grand jury in cases entitled' *“The People of the State of California*v. *Israel Weinberg,”*numbered 7530 to 7537, inclusive, wherein the defendant was charged with the murder of eight different persons. Upon one of these indictments only the defendant has.been tried and acquitted by a jury. The record of that case is 'before us, as are also the proceedings before the grand jury in each of these several indictments which have not yet been put to trial.

We are of the opinion that the rule adopted in the'matter of *Ex. parte Rena Mooney,*No. 709, *ante,*p. 797, [171 Pac. 109], as well as the reason for its application, are to be given full application to the instant case. Upon the reasoning and authorities in the ease of *Ex parte Bena Mooney, supra,*the application herein will be denied and the petitioner remanded, and it is so ordered.
# EUR-Lex - 32000D0555 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000D0555

**2000/555/EC: Commission Decision of 6 September 2000 amending Decision 97/569/EC on drawing up provisional lists of third country establishments from which the Member States authorise imports of meat products (notified under document number C(2000) 2480) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 235 , 19/09/2000 P. 0025 - 0026 *

Commission Decision

of 6 September 2000

amending Decision 97/569/EC on drawing up provisional lists of third country establishments from which the Member States authorise imports of meat products

(notified under document number C(2000) 2480)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2000/555/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 95/408/EC of 22 June 1995 on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States are authorised to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs(1), as last amended by Decision 98/603/EC(2), and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Provisional lists of establishments in third countries producing meat products have been drawn up by Commission Decision 97/569/EC(3), as last amended by Commission Decision 2000/253/EC(4).

(2) Australia has sent a list of establishments producing meat products and for which the responsible authorities certify that the establishments are in accordance with the Community rules.

(3) A provisional list of establishments producing meat products can thus be drawn up for Australia. Commission Decision 97/569/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.

(4) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The text of the Annex to this Decision is added to the Annex of Decision 97/569/EC.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 September 2000.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 243, 11.10.1995, p. 17.

(2) OJ L 289, 28.10.1998, p. 36.

(3) OJ L 234, 26.8.1997, p. 16.

(4) OJ L 78, 29.3.2000, p. 32.

ANEXO/BILAG/ANHANG/ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ/ANNEX/ANNEXE/ALLEGATO/BIJLAGE/ANEXO/LIITE/BILAGA

"País: Australia/Land: Australien/Land: Australien/Χώρα: Αυστραλία/Country: Australia/Pays: Australie/Paese: Australia/Land: Australië/País: Austrália/Maa: Australia/Land: Australien

>TABLE>"
# EUR-Lex - 31997R2048 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31997R2048

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2048/97 of 20 October 1997 amending Regulations (EC) No 936/97 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat and (EC) No 996/97 on the opening and administration of an import tariff quota for frozen thin skirt of bovine animals falling within CN code 0206 29 91 **

*
Official Journal L 287 , 21/10/1997 P. 0010 - 0010 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2048/97 of 20 October 1997 amending Regulations (EC) No 936/97 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat and (EC) No 996/97 on the opening and administration of an import tariff quota for frozen thin skirt of bovine animals falling within CN code 0206 29 91

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/97 of 27 May 1997 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat (1), and in particular Article 7 (2) thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 996/97 of 3 June 1997 on the opening and administration of an import tariff quota for frozen thin skirt of bovine animals falling within CN code 0206 29 91 (2), and in particular Article 6 (2) thereof,

Whereas Argentina has renamed the authority empowered to issue certificates of authenticity; whereas Annex II to Regulations (EC) No 936/97 and (EC) No 996/97 should therefore be amended,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Annex II to Regulations (EC) No 936/97 and (EC) No 996/97, 'Secretaría de agricultura, ganadería y pesca` is replaced by 'Secretaría de agricultura, ganadería, pesca y alimentación`.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply with effect from 17 July 1997.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 October 1997.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 137, 28. 5. 1997, p. 10.

(2) OJ L 144, 4. 6. 1997, p. 6.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of approval of amendment to Tribal-State Compact. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish, in the                         **Federal Register**                        , notice of approved Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, has approved an Amendment, executed on May 2, 2000, to the Gaming Compact between the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana and the State of Louisiana.                     

# DATES:

This action is effective May 16, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George T. Skibine, Director, Office of Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066. 

Dated: May 4, 2000.

Levin Gover, 

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 00-12321 Filed 5-15-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
# EUR-Lex - 31999R0866 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999R0866

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 866/1999 of 26 April 1999 concerning the authorisation of new additives and new additive uses in feedingstuffs **

*
Official Journal L 108 , 27/04/1999 P. 0021 - 0027 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 866/1999

of 26 April 1999

concerning the authorisation of new additives and new additive uses in feedingstuffs

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 70/524/EEC of 23 November 1970 concerning additives in feedingstuffs(1), as last amended by Directive 1999/20/EC(2), and in particular Articles 3 and 9j thereof,

(1) Whereas Directive 70/524/EEC provides that new additives or new additive uses may be authorised, taking account of advances in scientific and technical knowledge;

(2) Whereas Council Directive 93/113/EC of 14 December 1993 concerning the use and the marketing of enzymes, micro-organisms and their preparations in animal nutrition(3), as last amended by Directive 97/40/EC(4), by derogation from Directive 70/524/EEC, authorised Member States to permit provisionally the use and marketing of enzymes, micro-organisms and their preparations;

(3) Whereas the examination of the dossiers, submitted by the Member States in accordance with Article 3 of Directive 93/113/EC, indicates that a certain number of preparations belonging to the groups of enzymes and micro-organisms can be provisionally authorised;

(4) Whereas the Scientific Committee for Animal Nutrition has delivered a favourable opinion with regard to the harmlessness of these preparations;

(5) Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Feedingstuffs,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The preparations belonging to the group "enzymes" and listed in Annex I to this Regulation may be authorised according to Directive 70/524/EEC as additives in animal nutrition under the conditions laid down in that Annex.

Article 2

The preparations belonging to the group "micro-organisms" and listed in Annex II to this Regulation may be authorised according to Directive 70/524/EEC as additives in animal nutrition under the conditions laid down in that Annex.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 1 July 1999.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 April 1999.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 270, 14.12.1970, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 80, 25.3.1999, p. 20.

(3) OJ L 334, 31.12.1993, p. 17.

(4) OJ L 180, 9.7.1997, p. 21.

ANNEX I

>TABLE>

ANNEX II

>TABLE>