31426 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 106 / Thursday, June 3, 2010 / Notices 

Dated: May 24, 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–13373 Filed 6–2–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–560–802) 

Certain Preserved Mushrooms from 

Indonesia: Notice of Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Goldberger or Kate Johnson, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, N.W., 

Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4136 or (202) 482–4929, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 1, 2010, the Department 

of Commerce (the Department) 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of ‘‘Opportunity to Request 

Administrative Review’’ of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

preserved mushrooms from Indonesia 

for the period of review (POR), February 

1, 2009, through January 31, 2010. See 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity to Request 

Administrative Review, 75 FR 5037 

(February 1, 2010). 

On March 1, 2010, in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.213(b), the Department 

received a timely request from Monterey 

Mushrooms, Inc., a petitioner and a 

domestic interested party in the above– 

referenced proceeding, to conduct an 

administrative review of the sales of PT 

Eka Timur Raya (ETIRA), PT Indo 

Evergreen Agro Business Corp., PT 

Karya Kompos Bagas, and Tuwuh 

Agung PT. Monterey Mushrooms, Inc. 

was the only party to request this 

administrative review. 

On March 30, 2010, the Department 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of initiation of an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain preserved mushrooms from 

Indonesia with respect to these 

companies. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Request for 

Revocation in Part, 75 FR 15679 (March 

30, 2010). 

On May 14, 2010, Monterey 

Mushrooms, Inc. timely withdrew its 

request for review. 

Rescission of Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Department will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the parties that requested a 

review withdraw the request within 90 

days of the date of publication of notice 

of initiation of the requested review. 

Monterey Mushrooms, Inc. withdrew its 

request for review before the 90-day 

deadline, and no other party requested 

an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

preserved mushrooms from Indonesia. 

Therefore, in response to Monterey 

Mushrooms, Inc.’s withdrawal of its 

request for review, and pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department is 

rescinding the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

preserved mushrooms from Indonesia 

for the period February 1, 2009, through 

January 31, 2010. 

Assessment 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. Antidumping duties 

shall be assessed at rates equal to the 

cash deposit of estimated antidumping 

duties required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions directly to CBP 15 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility, 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2), to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: May 27, 2010. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–13436 Filed 6–2–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS 

Notice of Meeting 

Established By Congress May 17, 1910. 

The next meeting of the U.S. 

Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 

for 17 June 2010, at 10 a.m. in the 

Commission offices at the National 

Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary 

Square, 401 F Street, NW., Washington 

DC, 20001–2728. Items of discussion 

may include buildings, parks and 

memorials. 

Draft agendas and additional 

information regarding the Commission 

are available on our Web site: http:// 

www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the 

agenda and requests to submit written 

or oral statements should be addressed 

to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. 

Commission of Fine Arts, at the above 

address; by e-mailing staff@cfa.gov; or 

by calling 202–504–2200. Individuals 

requiring sign language interpretation 

for the hearing impaired should contact 

the Secretary at least 10 days before the 

meeting date. 

Dated: May 26, 2010 in Washington DC. 

Thomas Luebke, 

AIA Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–13176 Filed 6–2–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6330–01–M 

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Meeting of Chronic Hazard 

Advisory Panel on Phthalates and 

Phthalate Substitutes and Opportunity 

for Public Comment 

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of meeting. 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 106 / Thursday, June 3, 2010 / Notices 31427 

SUMMARY: The Consumer Product Safety 

Commission (‘‘CPSC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) 

announces the second meeting of the 

Chronic Hazard Advisory Panel (CHAP) 

on phthalates and phthalate substitutes. 

The Commission appointed this CHAP 

to study the effects on children’s health 

of all phthalates and phthalate 

alternatives as used in children’s toys 

and child care articles, pursuant to 

section 108 of the Consumer Product 

Safety Improvement Act of 2008 

(CPSIA) (Pub. L. 110–314). The public 

may submit written or oral comments 

on the issues to be considered by the 

CHAP. 

DATES: The opportunity to present oral 

comments will be on July 26, 2010, from 

10 a.m. to 5 p.m. The remainder of the 

meeting will be from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

on July 27 and from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. 

on July 28, 2010. Requests to present 

oral comments must be filed with the 

Office of the Secretary no later than July 

1, 2010. Written comments, and a 

written copy of the text of the oral 

comments, must be received no later 

than July 12, 2010. Commenters should 

limit their presentations to 

approximately 15 minutes, exclusive of 

any periods of questioning by the 

members of the CHAP or the Consumer 

Product Safety Commission (CPSC) 

staff. The CHAP may further limit the 

time for any presentation and to impose 

restrictions to avoid excessive 

duplication of presentations. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be in the 

fourth floor hearing room on July 26 and 

27 and in room 410 on July 28, 2010, in 

the Commission’s offices at 4330 East 

West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland. 

Written comments, or requests to 

present oral comments and the written 

text of such comments, should be 

captioned ‘‘CHAP on Phthalates’’ and 

sent by electronic mail (e-mail) to cpscos@cpsc.gov, or mailed or delivered to 

the Office of the Secretary, Consumer 

Product Safety Commission, 4330 EastWest Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 

20814. 

Online Registration and Webcast: 

Members of the public who wish to 

attend the meeting are requested to 

preregister online at http:// 

www.cpsc.gov/cgibin/chap.aspx. This 

meeting will also be available live via 

webcast on July 26 and July 27, and by 

prerecorded webcast on July 28, 2010, at 

http://www.cpsc.gov/webcast. 

Registration is not necessary to view the 

webcast. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Concerning requests and procedures for 

oral presentations of comments: 

Rockelle Hammond, Consumer Product 

Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD 

20814; telephone: (301) 504–6833; email cpscos@cpsc.gov. For all other 

matters: Michael Babich, Directorate for 

Health Sciences, Consumer Product 

Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD 

20814; telephone (301) 504–07253; email mbabich@cpsc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission has previously investigated 

potential risks posed to children from 

phthalate plasticizers, especially di (2- 

ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and 

diisononyl phthalate (DINP), which 

were used to soften some children’s 

teethers, rattles, and toys made from 

polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Phthalates 

can leach from such products when they 

are mouthed by children, causing some 

phthalates to be ingested. In addition, 

children and adults can be exposed to 

phthalates from many sources, 

including consumer products, food, 

cosmetics, medical devices, and the 

environment. Certain phthalates have 

been shown to cause adverse health 

effects, including birth defects, in 

laboratory animals. Section 108 of the 

CPSIA permanently prohibits the sale of 

any ‘‘children’s toy or child care article’’ 

containing more than 0.1 percent of 

each of three specified phthalates—di- 

(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), dibutyl 

phthalate (DBP), and benzyl butyl 

phthalate (BBP). Section 108 of the 

CPSIA also prohibits on an interim basis 

the sale of any ‘‘children’s toy that can 

be placed in a child’s mouth’’ or ‘‘child 

care articles’’ containing more than 0.1 

percent of each of three additional 

phthalates—diisononyl phthalate 

(DINP), diisodecyl phthalate (DIDP), and 

di-n-octyl phthalate (DnOP). 

Section 108 of the CPSIA requires the 

Commission to convene a CHAP ‘‘to 

study the effects on children’s health of 

all phthalates and phthalate alternatives 

as used in children’s toys and child care 

articles.’’ The CPSIA requires the CHAP 

to complete an examination of the full 

range of phthalates that are used in 

products for children and to: (i) 

Examine all of the potential health 

effects (including endocrine disrupting 

effects) of the full range of phthalates; 

(ii) consider the potential health effects 

of each of these phthalates both in 

isolation and in combination with other 

phthalates; (iii) examine the likely 

levels of children’s, pregnant women’s, 

and others’ exposure to phthalates, 

based on a reasonable estimation of 

normal and foreseeable use and abuse of 

such products; (iv) consider the 

cumulative effect of total exposure to 

phthalates, both from children’s 

products and from other sources, such 

as personal care products; (v) review all 

relevant data, including the most recent, 

best-available, peer-reviewed, scientific 

studies of these phthalates and 

phthalate alternatives that employ 

objective data collection practices or 

employ other objective methods; (vi) 

consider the health effects of phthalates 

not only from ingestion but also as a 

result of dermal, hand-to-mouth, or 

other exposure; (vii) consider the level 

at which there is a reasonable certainty 

of no harm to children, pregnant 

women, or other susceptible individuals 

and their offspring, considering the best 

available science, and using sufficient 

safety factors to account for 

uncertainties regarding exposure and 

susceptibility of children, pregnant 

women, and other potentially 

susceptible individuals; and (viii) 

consider possible similar health effects 

of phthalate alternatives used in 

children’s toys and child care articles. 

The CHAP’s examination must be 

conducted de novo, and the statute 

specifies completion of its examination 

within 18 months of appointment of the 

CHAP. The CHAP must review prior 

work on phthalates by the Commission, 

but the Commission’s prior work is not 

to be considered determinative. Within 

180 days after completing its 

examination, the CHAP shall report to 

the Commission the results of the 

examination and shall make 

recommendations to the Commission 

regarding any phthalates (or 

combinations of phthalates or 

alternatives to phthalates) in addition to 

those permanently banned by the CPSIA 

that the CHAP determines should be 

declared hazardous substances. 

The first meeting of the CHAP was on 

April 14–15, 2010. The second meeting 

of the CHAP will be on July 26–28, 

2010, in the fourth floor hearing room 

at the Commission’s offices in Bethesda, 

MD (see address above). The CHAP is 

seeking public comment on issues 

relating to the hazard, exposure, and 

risk posed by phthalates and phthalate 

substitutes from all sources of exposure, 

and especially in children’s products. 

The CHAP is especially interested in 

comments and data pertaining to: 

1. Information on current and 

anticipated future uses of phthalates 

and phthalate substitutes in products, 

including market data, production 

levels, and the range of uses of specific 

phthalates and phthalate substitutes in 

different product types. 

2. Data on the types and levels of 

phthalates and phthalate substitutes 

found in consumer products, cosmetics, 

pharmaceutical drugs, medical devices, 

food, food supplements, food packaging, 

and pesticides. 

3. Information on the relative 

importance of different sources, routes, 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
31428 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 106 / Thursday, June 3, 2010 / Notices 

and pathways of exposure to phthalates 

in the general population, expectant 

mothers, and children. For example, 

what are the relative contributions of 

exposure from diet, consumer products, 

ambient air, and other sources, which 

may differ depending on the particular 

phthalate and the exposed population? 

4. Data on consumer use patterns 

including the use of cosmetics and 

consumer products that may contain 

phthalates. 

5. Data on children’s activity patterns, 

including mouthing activity, exposure 

to household dust, dermal exposure to 

toys, and other potential child-specific 

exposure pathways. 

6. Information relating to human 

exposure to phthalates and phthalate 

substitutes, including migration data, 

levels in environmental media (ambient 

and indoor air, water, soil, household 

dust), dermal exposure, oral exposure, 

and bioavailability. 

7. New, unpublished, or soon-to-be 

published data on the types and levels 

of phthalates, phthalate substitutes, or 

their metabolites in human urine, blood, 

milk, or other biological media. 

8. Information relating to metabolism 

or pharmacokinetic modeling that could 

be used to estimate human exposure 

from biomonitoring studies. 

9. Toxicity data on the full range of 

phthalates and phthalate substitutes in 

commercial use, especially unpublished 

or soon-to-be-published studies. 

10. Human data on the toxicity of 

phthalates, including epidemiological 

and clinical studies, especially 

unpublished or soon-to-be published 

studies. 

11. Information on the relative 

sensitivity of potentially vulnerable 

populations, including the fetus, young 

children, and expectant mothers, and 

whether there are any other vulnerable 

populations that should be considered. 

12. Information relating to assessing 

the cumulative (combined) risk from 

multiple phthalates, including dose 

response data, methodology, which 

health endpoint (or endpoints) is the 

most relevant to human risk assessment, 

and which phthalate substitutes or other 

compounds may contribute to the 

combined risk. 

Any information submitted to CPSC 

in response to this request will become 

part of the public record. The CHAP is 

especially interested in unpublished 

studies relating to toxicity or exposure. 

However, the CHAP will not consider 

summaries of toxicological studies 

prepared by chemical manufacturers as 

substitutes for the complete studies. 

There will be an opportunity for oral 

comments on July 26, 2010, from 10 

a.m. to 5 p.m. Persons wishing to 

present oral comments should file a 

request with the Commission’s Office of 

the Secretary no later than July 1, 2010, 

and submit the text of their comments 

not later than July 12, 2010. 

Commenters should limit their 

presentations to approximately 15 

minutes, exclusive of any periods of 

questioning by the members of the 

CHAP or the CPSC staff. The CHAP may 

further limit the time for any 

presentation and to impose restrictions 

to avoid excessive duplication of 

presentations. Interested persons may 

also file written comments with the 

CHAP. Written comments must be filed 

with the Office of the Secretary no later 

than July 12, 2010. The remainder of the 

CHAP meeting will be from 8:30 a.m. to 

5 p.m. on July 27 and from 8:30 a.m. to 

4 p.m. on July 28, 2010. During this part 

of the meeting, the CHAP will discuss 

issues and the report it will write. 

Dated: May 28, 2010 

Alberta E. Mills, 

Acting Secretary, Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–13389 Filed 6–2–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Notice of Proposed Information 

Collection Requests 

AGENCY: Department of Education. 

SUMMARY: The Acting Director, 

Information Collection Clearance 

Division, Regulatory Information 

Management Services, Office of 

Management, invites comments on the 

proposed information collection 

requests as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Interested persons are invited to 

submit comments on or before August 2, 

2010. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires 

that the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) provide interested 

Federal agencies and the public an early 

opportunity to comment on information 

collection requests. OMB may amend or 

waive the requirement for public 

consultation to the extent that public 

participation in the approval process 

would defeat the purpose of the 

information collection, violate State or 

Federal law, or substantially interfere 

with any agency’s ability to perform its 

statutory obligations. The Acting 

Director, Information Collection 

Clearance Division, Regulatory 

Information Management Services, 

Office of Management, publishes that 

notice containing proposed information 

collection requests prior to submission 

of these requests to OMB. Each 

proposed information collection, 

grouped by office, contains the 

following: (1) Type of review requested, 

e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or 

reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of 

the collection; (4) Description of the 

need for, and proposed use of, the 

information; (5) Respondents and 

frequency of collection; and (6) 

Reporting and/or Recordkeeping 

burden. OMB invites public comment. 

The Department of Education is 

especially interested in public comment 

addressing the following issues: (1) Is 

this collection necessary to the proper 

functions of the Department; (2) will 

this information be processed and used 

in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate 

of burden accurate; (4) how might the 

Department enhance the quality, utility, 

and clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (5) how might the 

Department minimize the burden of this 

collection on the respondents, including 

through the use of information 

technology. 

Dated: May 28, 2010. 

Sheila Carey, 

Acting Director, Information Collection 

Clearance Division, Regulatory Information 

Management Services, Office of Management. 

Office of Postsecondary Education 

Type of Review: Revision. 

Title: FIPSE Performance Reports. 

Frequency: Annually. 

Affected Public: Not-for-profit 

institutions. 

Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour 

Burden: 

Responses: 901. 

Burden Hours: 10,426. 

Abstract: This collection includes an 

annual and a final performance report 

for use with all of the following FIPSE 

programs: Comprehensive (84.116B), 

EU–U.S. (84.116J), U.S.-Brazil 

(84.116M), North America (84.116N), 

and U.S.-Russia (84.116S) Programs. 

Also included is an annual and a final 

performance report for CongressionallyDirected grants (earmarks) (84.116Z). A 

total of five (5) forms comprise this 

collection. We need to collect this data 

in order to evaluate and assess each 

grantee for continued funding and 

assessment of their project. 

Requests for copies of the proposed 

information collection request may be 

accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov, 

by selecting the ‘‘Browse Pending 

Collections’’ link and by clicking on link 

number 4304. When you access the 

information collection, click on 

‘‘Download Attachments’’ to view. 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES