alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-26-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-26-2000
<CASH>                                             344
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,101
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,160
<PP&E>                                          11,554
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,144
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,076
<BONDS>                                          1,759
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              986
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           481
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,823
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,104
<SALES>                                         35,925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,925
<CGS>                                           28,102
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,020
<INCOME-TAX>                                       337
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                633
<DISCONTINUED>                                     230
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       403
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .81


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Reclamation 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Reclamation, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) has scheduled the first meeting for long-term water service contracts with the California Department of Fish and Game, Grassland Water District (representing the Grasslands Resources Conservation District), and long-term memoranda of understanding with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This first meeting will include distribution of the draft agreements, establishing each party's negotiation team, and setting the schedule for future negotiation sessions. The public is welcome to observe the meeting process. 

# DATES:

The first meeting will be held on Thursday, May 18, 2000 from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Expo Inn, 1413 Howe Avenue, Sacramento, California. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Stan Yarborough, Reclamation, at (916) 978-5516. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The water service contractual agreements are to provide “firm water supplies of suitable quality to maintain and improve wetland habitat areas on units of the National Wildlife Refuge System in the Central Valley of California; on the Gray Lodge, Los Banos, Volta, North Grasslands, and Mendota state wildlife management areas; and on the Grasslands Resources Conservation District in the Central Valley of California,” in accordance with the requirements of section 3406(d) of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA). Before the enactment of the CVPIA, most of the Federal, State and local refuges identified above did not have firm water supplies to meet optimum refuge water management needs (Level 4 needs). The negotiation process that commences on May 18, 2000, is intended to yield new long-term refuge water service agreements to supply up to Level 4 needs. In some cases, these new agreements may replace existing agreements. 

Dated: May 11, 2000. 

Mary Johannis, 

Acting Regional Resources Manager, Mid-Pacific Region. 

[FR Doc. 00-12349 Filed 5-15-00; 5:09 pm] 

BILLING CODE 4310-94-P
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 4, 2022

NO. 03

- 21

- 00551

- CV

T. S. A. , Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 421ST DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY
BEFO RE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on October 6, 2021

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. Because

appellant is ind igent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 93 (Friday, May 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30608-30609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11953]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Adoption of Proposed Leasing Regulations/Guidelines for the El 
Portal Administrative Site, Yosemite National Park, Mariposa County, 
California; Notice of Extended Public Comment

SUMMARY: The National Park Service is responsible for management and 
administration of the El Portal Administrative Site. To facilitate such 
activities the Superintendent of Yosemite National Park, acting on 
behalf of the Secretary of the Interior, has been authorized to issue 
leases for Administrative Site lands, subject to terms, conditions, and 
guidelines appropriate for proper administration, protection, and 
development of the site. The proposed lease guidelines set forth 
eligibility qualifications for those seeking to acquire a lease, 
process to be

[[Page 30609]]

used to establish lease fees, and circumstances under which the 
Superintendent may acquire unexpired leases.

Reference

    Public Law 85-922 of September 2, 1958, Public Law 90-409 of July 
21, 1968 and Public Law 99-542 of October 27, 1986, as codified in 
Title 16 United States Code Sections 47-1 through 47-6.

Comments

    The original comment period ended April 25, 2000. The extended 
comment period shall end June 30, 2000. Requests for a copy of the 
proposed leasing program, or written comments, should be addressed to: 
Superintendent, Yosemite National Park, c/o Office of Special Park 
Uses, P.O. Box 700, El Portal, California, 95318. If individuals 
submitting comments request that their name or/and address be withheld 
from public disclosure, it will be honored to the extent allowable by 
law. Such requests must be stated prominently at the beginning of the 
comments. There also may be circumstances wherein the NPS will withhold 
a respondent's identity as allowable by law. As always: NPS will make 
available to public inspection all submissions from organizations or 
businesses and from persons identifying themselves as representatives 
or officials of organizations and businesses; and, anonymous comments 
may not be considered.

    Dated: May 3, 2000.
Cynthina Ip,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 00-11953 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Exhibit 32.1



Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer



I, Michel Attias, Chief Executive Officer of Patriot Motorcycle Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 22, 2005



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/    MICHEL ATTIAS   
|Michel Attias          
|Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.2 
   
I, Raymond L. Carr, certify that:
  
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Kentucky Investors, Inc.;
  
2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
  
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and we have:
   
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared,
   
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation, and
   
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
  
5.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:
   
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
   
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  
Date: March 24, 2005
By: /s/ Raymond L. Carr 
Raymond L. Carr 
Chief Financial Officer - Vice President**
§ 1918.87 Ship's cargo elevators. ( a ) *Safe working load.* The safe working loads of ship's cargo elevators shall be determined and followed.
( b ) *Load distribution.* Loads shall be evenly distributed and maintained on the elevator's platform.
( c ) *Elevator personnel restrictions.* Personnel shall not be permitted to ride on the elevator's platform if a fall hazard exists. (See § 1918.2.)
( d ) *Open deck barricades.* During elevator operation, each open deck that presents a fall hazard to employees shall be effectively barricaded.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - 10 CFR Part 50

# AGENCY:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice of workshop. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will host a public workshop to solicit feedback on the implementation of the direct final rule for 10 CFR 50.54(a) and to gather information to determine the need for the development of the voluntary alternative rulemaking based on Nuclear Energy Institute petition PRM-50-62. On February 23, 1999, the NRC published a direct final rule in the                         **Federal Register**                         (64 FR 9029), that amended its regulations to permit power reactor licensees to implement certain quality assurance (QA) program changes without obtaining prior NRC approval of these changes. The direct final rule became effective on April 26, 1999. Based on the workshop outcome, the staff will determine whether additional rulemaking is warranted. The NRC invites comments from interested parties who are unable to attend the workshop.                     

# DATES:

The workshop will be held on Wednesday, June 7, 2000, from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, One White Flint North (Room 14 B6), 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852-2738, (301) 415-7000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Robert Pettis, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, telephone: (301) 415-3214, email                         *rlp4@nrc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The discussion topics are tentative and subject to change. Anyone interested in providing a presentation on these or other related topics, please contact Robert Pettis at (301) 415-3214. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 12th day of May, 2000.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Theodore R. Quay, 

Chief, IQMB, Division of Inspection Program Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 00-12621 Filed 5-18-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### MOORE v. THE STATE.

(Decided December 19, 1916.)

Appeal from Winston Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Bernard Harwood.

R. L. Blanton and Travis Williams, for appellant.

W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed for failure to file transcript.
#### O. K. BOWER *v.*Thelma L. BOWER

5-5813

476 S.W. 2d 8

Opinion delivered February 14, 1972

*954
      *James B. Blair,*for appellant.

*Jones <h Segers,*for appellee.

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This is a divorce case. The parties were married in 1924, were divorced in Illinois in 1959, remarried in 1961, and again separated on October 24, 1962. In 1963 Mrs. Bower obtained a decree of separate maintenance. In 1970 Dr. Bower filed the present suit for divorce, on the ground of three years separation. By counterclaim Mrs. Bower sought a divorce, for general indignities. The chancellor awarded the divorce to Dr. Bower, upon the ground of three years separation. The court found, however, that Dr. Bower was at fault in causing the separation. An award of alimony was accordingly made to Mrs. Bower.

It is established by the weight of the evidence that on more than one occasion Dr. Bower falsely accused his wife of having been intimate with other men. Such conduct is a ground for divorce, *Relaford*v. *Relaford,*235 Ark. 325, 359 S. W. 2d 801 (1962), and, *a fortiori,*for a separation. The appellant is mistaken in arguing that the proof of his accusations was inadmissible, for the asserted reasons that the accusations were made (a) after the separation and (b) more than five years before this suit was filed. We rejected both those contentions in *Alexander*v. *Alexander,*227 Ark. 938, 302 S. W. 2d 781 (1957), holding the evidence to be admissible on the issue of whose fault caused the separation. It follows that the chancellor was not in error in finding that Dr. Bower was the party at fault in this case.

Nor can we sustain the appellant’s argument that the court should not have allowed Mrs. Bower any alimony at all. Not only was it shown that Dr. Bower was at fault; there is no proof at all of any fault on Mrs. Bower’s part. At the time of the trial she was almost sixty-five years old and was not trained to earn a livelihood. Dr. Bower had an income of about $9,000 a year and had recently received an inheritance valued at some $40,000. We find the decision to award alimony to be fully supported by the record. The appellee is allowed *955an additional attorney’s fee of $500 in connection with this appeal.

Affirmed.
#### § 1955.43 Transmission of the record.

If exceptions are filed, the Secretary shall request the administrative law judge to transmit the record of the proceeding to the Secretary for review. The record shall include the State plan; a copy of the Assistant Secretary's notice of proposed withdrawal; the State's statement of items in contention; the notice of the hearing if any; any motions and requests filed in written form and rulings thereon; the transcript of the testimony taken at the hearing, together with any documents or papers filed in connection with the preliminary conference and the hearing itself; such proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, rules or orders, and supporting reasons as may have been filed; the administrative law judge's decision; and such exceptions, responses, and briefs in support thereof as may have been filed in the proceedings.
#### CLEVE. RY. CO. v. HUNTINGTON.

Ohio Supreme Court.

No. 21007.

Decided Dec. 5, 1928.

KINKADE, J.

RAILROADS.

(500 D2b). The fact alone that a motorman of a street car is charged by his employer with the duty of asking for names and addresses of persons on the street and near the car when there is an accident which affects the car or its passengers, and reporting the same to the company, does not impose upon the street car company a liability to respond in damages for a personal assault committed by the motorman on any such person, in connection with the performance of that duty, when the person assaulted has no contractual relation with the street car company.

Marshall, C. J., Day, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. Allen, J., concurs in the judgment.
§ 1960.90 Operating procedures. ( a ) The Executive Committee of each council shall meet at least 45 days before the beginning of each calendar year to approve an annual program for the council designed to accomplish the objectives and functions stated in § 1960.87. In addition, the Executive Committee shall meet periodically to ensure that the meetings and other activities of the council are being conducted as outlined in the council schedule.
( b ) The council program shall include at least four meetings or activities per year dealing with occupational safety and health issues.
( c ) Each field council shall submit to the Secretary or his designee by March 15 of each year a report describing the activities and programs of the previous calendar year and plans for the current year. In addition, the report shall address the participation and attendance of designated representatives of the council. The Office of Federal Agency Safety and Health Programs, OSHA, shall furnish guidelines to field councils concerning the preparation of this report.
( d ) Upon determination that a council is not operating in accordance with its charter and the provisions of this subpart, and after consultation with appropriate OSHA regional officials, the Secretary shall revoke the council's charter. Upon revocation of a charter, the council shall surrender all its government property to the appropriate OSHA regional official. Any continuing or future organization in the same geographical area shall not use the title Field Federal Safety and Health Council, or any derivation thereof, unless formally rechartered by the Secretary. Notification of revocation of a council's charter shall be sent to the chairperson, where identifiable, and to the appropriate OSHA Regional Office.
§ 1917.5 Compliance duties owed to each employee. ( a ) *Personal protective equipment.* Standards in this part requiring the employer to provide personal protective equipment (PPE), including respirators and other types of PPE, because of hazards to employees impose a separate compliance duty with respect to each employee covered by the requirement. The employer must provide PPE to each employee required to use the PPE, and each failure to provide PPE to an employee may be considered a separate violation.
( b ) *Training.* Standards in this part requiring training on hazards and related matters, such as standards requiring that employees receive training or that the employer train employees, provide training to employees, or institute or implement a training program, impose a separate compliance duty with respect to each employee covered by the requirement. The employer must train each affected employee in the manner required by the standard, and each failure to train an employee may be considered a separate violation.
[73 FR 75587, Dec. 12, 2008]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1904

#### Editorial Note:

At 82 FR 20548, May 3, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-21, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration removed all amendments to part 1904 published at 81 FR 91792, Dec. 19, 2016.

#### § 1904.36 Prohibition against discrimination.

In addition to § 1904.35, section 11(c) of the OSH Act also prohibits you from discriminating against an employee for reporting a work-related fatality, injury, or illness. That provision of the Act also protects the employee who files a safety and health complaint, asks for access to the part 1904 records, or otherwise exercises any rights afforded by the OSH Act.

[81 FR 29692, May 12, 2016]