alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 29.427 Unsymmetrical loads. ( a ) Horizontal tail surfaces and their supporting structure must be designed for unsymmetrical loads arising from yawing and rotor wake effects in combination with the prescribed flight conditions.
( b ) To meet the design criteria of paragraph (a) of this section, in the absence of more rational data, both of the following must be met: ( 1 ) One hundred percent of the maximum loading from the symmetrical flight conditions acts on the surface on one side of the plane of symmetry, and no loading acts on the other side.
( 2 ) Fifty percent of the maximum loading from the symmetrical flight conditions acts on the surface on each side of the plane of symmetry, in opposite directions.
( c ) For empennage arrangements where the horizontal tail surfaces are supported by the vertical tail surfaces, the vertical tail surfaces and supporting structure must be designed for the combined vertical and horizontal surface loads resulting from each prescribed flight condition, considered separately. The flight conditions must be selected so that the maximum design loads are obtained on each surface. In the absence of more rational data, the unsymmetrical horizontal tail surface loading distributions described in this section must be assumed.
[Amdt. 27-26, 55 FR 8002, Mar. 6, 1990, as amended by Amdt. 29-31, 55 FR 38966, Sept. 21, 1990]
Exhibit 10.2


AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT


          This
Amendment dated as of the 25th day of November, 2009 (the “Amendment”) to the Option Agreement by and
between Somerset Hills Bancorp (the “Company”)
and Stewart E. McClure, Jr. (the “Optionee”)
dated as of March 19, 2001 (the “Agreement”).



WITNESSETH:


          WHEREAS, the Optionee has the right to
purchase up to 93,494 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the
non-qualified options (the “NQOs”) granted to the Optionee pursuant to the
Agreement, as adjusted for subsequent stock dividends; 


          WHEREAS, the NQOs are set to expire on
March 19, 2011; and 


          WHEREAS, the Company and Optionee believe
it is in the best interest of each party to extend the expiration date of the
NQO’s until March 19, 2014; 


          NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and
intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows: 


          1. Section
4(b) of the Agreement shall be amended to provide for an extension to the
expiration date for the NQOs until March 19, 2014. 


          2. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary, there shall be no amendment of, including, but not
limited to, any extension of the expiration date of, those options granted in
the Agreement to the Optionee which qualify as incentive stock options pursuant
to section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. 


          3. The
Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, is in all respects ratified and shall
remain in full force and effect. The Agreement and this Amendment shall be
read, taken and construed as one and the same instrument. 


          4. This
Amendment may be executed in two counterparts, each of which shall be an
original, but both of which together shall constitute but one and the same
instrument.





          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have
caused this Amendment to be duly executed by persons thereunto duly authorized
as of the date and year first written above. 


	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 SOMERSET HILLS
 BANCORP

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 By: 

 	
 /s/

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
 

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
 Name: William S.
 Burns

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
 Title: Chief
 Financial Officer

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 OPTIONEE

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 /s/

 
	
  

 	
 

 
	
  

 	
 Stewart E.
 McClure, Jr.

 President and CEO

 



2
<PAGE>





                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Enstar Group, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,
certifies that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

         /s/Nimrod T. Frazer
--------------------------------------------------------------
Nimrod T. Frazer
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
March 30, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Enstar Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Enstar Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 30, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 30, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A25D0029. QUINTERRIOUS TURNER v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

19SC173776
Exhibit 23
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
One City Centre
St. Louis, MO 63101

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-60996 and 33-52357 of Laclede Gas Company and its subsidiary companies on
Form S-3 and in Registration Statement Nos. 33-38413, 33-57573 and 33-64933
of Laclede Gas Company and its subsidiary companies on Form S-8 of our
report dated November 20, 1997 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Laclede Gas Company and its subsidiary companies for the year ended
September 30, 1997.


Deloitte & Touche LLP

December 19, 1997 


  
































                                    83
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
KNICKERBOCKER VILLAGE INC. FORM 10KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          92,956
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  443,485
<ALLOWANCES>                                   301,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,147,282
<PP&E>                                       7,598,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                 532,932
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,937,668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,428,982
<BONDS>                                      6,066,258
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       317,048
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,278,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,937,668
<SALES>                                     10,157,928
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,169,134
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,859,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             544,394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                309,944
<INCOME-TAX>                                   166,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            143,944
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   143,944
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2008080EN.01000701.xml

| 1.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.1471 — Statoil/ICA/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 80/03)

On 14 July 1999, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 31999M1471. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 31999M1471. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF C. A. S., JR AND 

S. E. R. S., CHILDREN,

 

 Appellant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00027-CV

Appeal from the

109th District Court

of Andrews County, Texas 

(TC# 21,851)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the District Clerk’s request for an extension of time within 

which to file the Clerk’s Record until February 21, 2022. NO FURTHER REQUESTS 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE CLERK’S RECORD WILL BE CONSIDERED 

BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Sherry Dushane, District Clerk for the 109th District Court 

for Andrews County, Texas, prepare the Clerk’s Record and forward the same to this Court on or 

before February 21, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 3

rd day of February, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
Supporting Materials #5 

Technical Support Documents 

See Attachment: 

+ GRIC Air Quality TSDs
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.29 Acceptable certifications. ( a ) *Pressure vessels.* Current and valid certification by an insurance company or regulatory authority shall be deemed as acceptable evidence of safe installation, inspection, and testing of pressure vessels provided by the employer.
( b ) *Boilers.* Boilers provided by the employer shall be deemed to be in compliance with the requirements of this part when evidence of current and valid certification by an insurance company or regulatory authority attesting to the safe installation, inspection, and testing is presented.
( c ) *Other requirements.* Regulations prescribing specific requirements for other types of pressure vessels and similar equipment are contained in subparts F and O of this part.
[No. 48593-8-I.

Division One.

October 21, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jon Lane, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 00-1-08315-3, Douglas D. McBroom, J., entered May 16, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit 10.18






Exhibit 10.18





	 	 	 
	

	 	ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION

DIVISION OF BUSINESS AND FINANCE

SECTION A: CONTRACT






	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	1. AMENDMENT

	 	2. CONTRACT
	 	3. EFFECTIVE DATE OF
	 	4. PROGRAM
	NUMBER: 
	 	NO.:

	 	CONTRACT:
	 	 
	               9

	 	YH09-0001-04
	 	    October 1, 2009
	 	DHCM — ACUTE






5. CONTRACTOR’S
NAME AND ADDRESS:


 Health Choice Arizona

410 N.
44th
Street, Suite 900
 Phoenix,
AZ 85008



6. PURPOSE
OF AMENDMENT: To amend Section D.



7. THE CONTRACT REFERENCED ABOVE FOLLOWS




	 	A.	 	Section D, Paragraph 53, Compensation, Subparagraph 11 revised to the following language:






Reconciliation
of Prospective non-MED Costs to Reimbursement: For CYE 09, AHCCCS will reconcile the Contractor’s prospective non-MED
medical cost expenses to prospective non-MED net capitation paid to the Contractor for dates of service July 1, 2009 through September 30, 2009.
This reconciliation will limit the Contractor’s profits and losses to 3%. Any losses in excess of 3% will be reimbursed to the
Contractor, and likewise, profits in excess of 3% will be recouped. Adjudicated encounter data will be used to determine medical expenses.
Refer to the Prospective non-MED Reconciliation Policy included in the ACOM for further details.



For CYE 10, AHCCCS will reconcile the Contractor’s prospective non-MED medical cost
expenses to prospective non-MED net capitation paid to the Contractor for dates of service during the contract year being reconciled.
This reconciliation will limit the Contractor’s profits and losses to 2%. Any losses in excess of 2% will be reimbursed to the Contractor, and likewise,
profits in excess of 2% will be recouped. Adjudicated encounter data will be used to determine medical expenses. Refer to the Prospective non-MED Reconciliation Policy included
in the ACOM for further details.





	 	 	 
	NOTE: Please sign, date, and return executed file by E-Mail to:

	 	Mark Held at Mark.Held@azahcccs.gov
	 

	 	Sr. Procurement Specialist
	 

	 	AHCCCS Contracts and
	 

	 	Purchasing and Georgina Maya at
	 

	 	Georgina.Maya@azahcccs.gov






8.
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED FOR HEREIN, ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE ORIGINAL

CONTRACT NOT HERETOFORE CHANGED AND/OR AMENDED REMAIN UNCHANGED AND

IN FULL EFFECT.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE PARTIES HERETO SIGN THEIR NAMES IN AGREEMENT



	 	 	 
	9. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE:

	 	10. SIGNATURE OF AHCCCSA
CONTRACTING
 OFFICER:
	 
	/s/
Carolyn
Rose

	 	/s/ Michael Veit
	 

	 	 
	TYPED
NAME: Carolyn Rose

	 	TYPED NAME: MICHAEL VEIT
	TITLE:
Chief Executive Officer

	 	TITLE: CONTRACTS &
PURCHASING  ADMINISTRATOR
	DATE: Oct 07 2009

	 	DATE: Oct 02 2009
GARY M. RIDLEY

Secretary ofTrunsportation

STATE OF OKLAHOMA

MARY FALLIN

Governor

'..',:~4'~I~},:~i\!, r.

lJ, ;_/L'"\, 1....-1;\:,.,;

July 22, 2013

Brooke chapman, Associate Director

Small Community Air Service Development Program

U. S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE W86-310

Washington, DC 20590

Dear Ms. Chapman.

'r'j

•• 1 i:.... ?c: 0 r,. "'"l' '.'~' i I... :)0

The Air Travelers form the greater Stillwater area and Oklahoma State University have to drive

up to 90 miles to getlo Oklahoma City or Tulsa iIi order to access the National Transportation

System via an air carrier. This places significant time and cost on the members of the

community who wish to travel. This added cost can impede potential businesses who want to

relocate or expand to the community of Stillwater. As we all know, air service is vitally

important to the economic wellbeing of businesses in the local community and as well as

throughout the state of Oklahoma. Regional business growth and sustainment depends, in part,

on the ability to meet the air travel needs of existing local businesses and institutions as well as

companies considering Stillwater as a location for their operations.

There are inherent financial risks and significant costs associated with starting schedule airline

service at a community that does not currently have service, and that airlines are looking for

financial support to help reduce that risk. The funds requested will be matched with significant

local dollars, including funds at the stale level that will be used for airline incentives to attract

new service at Stillwater Regional Airport. The large amount OffWlds already dedicated to this

project, over $3.5 million, shows the level of support within the community from both public and

private entities.

Again, it is my hope that you will give the Stillwater Regional Airport proposal full

consideration and award the funds requested to help Stillwater re-establish access to the National

Transportation System by attracting new service to Dallas/Ft Worth with American Airlines.

Sincerely,

a:;:4A' '

~~e~:~f Transportatio

3500 MARTIN LUTHER KING AVENUE. P.O. BOX 11357. OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73136.0357.405-425.3601
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                         Subsidiaries of Amdocs Limited

 List of the Subsidiaries       Jurisdiction of            Business Name
                               Incorporation or
                                 Organization

Amdocs (Cyprus) Ltd.       Republic of Cyprus        Amdocs (Cyprus) Ltd.
Amdocs (Israel) Limited    Israel                    Amdocs (Israel) Limited
                                                     (formerly P.S.
                                                     Publishing Systems Ltd.)
Amdocs (USA), Inc.         State of Delaware         Amdocs (USA), Inc.
European Software          Island of Guernsey,       European Software
Marketing Ltd.             Channel Islands           Marketing Ltd.
Amdocs (UK) Limited        United Kingdom            Amdocs (UK) Limited
Amdocs (Brazil) Limitada   Brazil                    Amdocs (Brazil) Limitada
Amdocs (Japan) Limited     Japan                     Amdocs (Japan) Limited.
Amdocs (ITALY) SRL         Torino, Italy             Amdocs (ITALY) SRL
Amdocs Software GmbH       Germany                   Amdocs Software GmbH
Amdocs, Inc.               State of Delaware         Amdocs, Inc.
Amdocs Services, Inc.      State of Delaware         Amdocs Services, Inc.
Amdocs Software            State of Delaware         Amdocs Software
Technologies, Inc.                                   Technologies, Inc.
Sypress, Inc.              State of Delaware         Sypress, Inc.
Canadian Directory         State of Delaware         Canadian Directory
Technology Ltd.                                      Technology Ltd.
Directory Technology Pty,  Victoria, Australia       Directory Technology
Ltd.                                                 Pty, Ltd.
Amdocs Management Limited  United Kingdom            Amdocs Management Limited
European Support Limited   United Kingdom            European Support Limited
Amdocs Hungary Kft.        Hungary                   Amdocs Hungary Kft.
Amdocs Development Limited Island of Cyprus          Amdocs Development
                                                     Limited
Amend to Compromise, Settlement & Mutual Release Agreement



 
 Exhibit 10.61

  
AMENDMENT TO COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND
MUTUAL RELEASE AGREEMENT 
 
This Amendment to the Compromise,
Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement (“Settlement Agreement”) dated as of September 1, 2002 between Buckeye Retirement Co., L.L.C., Ltd. (“Buckeye”) of Newton Falls, Ohio, and Murdock Communications Corporation
(“MCC”) of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and Guy O. Murdock, an individual residing in Cedar Rapids, Iowa (“Murdock”) is for the purpose of changing the date of the closing as defined in Section 7.1 of the Settlement Agreement.

 
That MCC entered into a Definitive Merger Agreement (the
“Merger” or “Merger Agreement”) with Polar Molecular Corporation (“Polar”) on December 19, 2001 and that the Merger is still in the process of being consummated. 
 
That the original date as stipulated for closing under 7.1 has passed and
therefore an amendment is needed to change the date to be that of the “Closing of the Merger”. For purposes of this amendment “Closing of the Merger” or “Effective Time” shall refer to the date and time of effectiveness
of the Merger in the State of Delaware. At such time as the Closing of the Merger the Settlement Agreement will be effective and if the Merger Agreement in not consummated then the Settlement Agreement will be null and void. 
 
That all other terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement remain the
same. 
 
In Witness Whereof, the Parties have executed this
Amendment. 
 

	 BUCKEYE RETIREMENT CO.,
L.L.C., LTD
	 	 	 	 
	
	 By:
	 	 /s/     WILLIAM E. SHAULIS

	 	 	 	 Title:
	 	  Manager


	 Date:
	 	  05/07/03

	 	 	 	 	 	 

 

	 MURDOCK COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION
	 	 	 	 
	
	 By:
	 	 /S/    WAYNE
WRIGHT  

	 	 	 	 Title:
	 	  Principal Acctg Officer


	 Date:
	 	  5/7/03

	 	 	 	 	 	 

 

	 GUY O. MURDOCK,
INDIVIDUALLY
	 	 	 	 
	
	 By:
	 	  

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 Date: