alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J. A27013/14

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

STATE FARM LIFE INSURANCE CO. :

: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

v. :
: LISA JEAN NELSON SHAWARBY AND RASHA KHEDR SHAWARBY :
:
: APPEAL OF: RASHA KHEDR SHAWARBY, :
: No. 1973 WDA 2013

: Appellant :

Appeal from the Order November 20, 2013, in the Court of Common Pleas of Cambria County

Civil Division at No. 2013-2999

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., SHOGAN AND MUSMANNO, JJ.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.: FILED FEBRUARY 25, 2015

This case is related to another case docketed at N o. 1972 WDA 2013,

captioned “Rasha Khedr Shawarby v. Amr Omar Shawarb y and the Estate of

Amr Omar Shawarby, a/k/a AO Shawarby, deceased.” O ur review reveals

appellant, Rasha Khedr Shawarby, filed a motion for consolidation of the two

cases at docket Nos. 1972 and 1973 WDA 2013. Appel lant’s motion was

denied on March 26, 2014 by per curiam order.

Instantly, we have received duplicate copies of th e briefs and

reproduced record filed at Docket No. 1972 WDA 2013 from appellant and

appellee, Amr Omar Shawarby and the Estate of Amr O mar Shawarby, a/k/a

AO Shawarby, deceased. State Farm Life Insurance C ompany has not filed aJ. A27013/14

- 2 -

brief. However, our review of a hearing transcript dated September 27,

2013, indicates State Farm Insurance Company was di smissed from the

case.
[Judge Fleming]: I’ll note for the record that

Jennifer Miller was present for State Farm Insuranc e Company in chambers, and she was basically dismissed upon agreement that State Farm has two life insurance policies on behalf of Dr. Shawarby, that all of the parties agree will be paid into the court with interest from the date of demise, and then the Prothonotary is going to be directed to hold those monies in an interest bearing account because of th e amount of the funds. So because Attorney Miller was then not involved in subsequent discussions, we agreed that she didn’t need to be here for the remaining proceedings and we assured her that we would not obligate State Farm any further than that

. Notes of testimony, 9/27/13 at 3-4.

Because the issues raised in this appeal are the e xact issues addressed

in the companion case and have been decided by our Memorandum decision

in that matter, we dismiss this duplicative appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 2/25/2015
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 21

<TABLE>
                                     PARENTS AND SUBSIDIARIES

The Company and its subsidiaries* as of March 4, 2006 are as follows:

<CAPTION>
                                              State (Country) of            Percentage of Voting
Name of Company                                  Incorporation                Securities Owned
---------------                             ----------------------         ----------------------
<S>                                             <C>                                <C>
Kellwood Company                                   Delaware                        Parent
American Recreation Products, Inc.                 Delaware                         100%
Kellwood Asia Limited                              Hong Kong                        100%
Smart Shirts Limited                               Hong Kong                        100%
South Asia Garment Limited                         Hong Kong                        100%
Kellwood Trading, Ltd.                             Hong Kong                        100%
KWD Holdings, Inc.                                 Delaware                         100%
Tri-W Corporation                               North Carolina                      100%
Halmode Apparel, Inc.                              Delaware                         100%
Kellwood Retail Group, Inc.                        Delaware                         100%
Koret of California, Inc.                         California                        100%
Kellwood Financial Resources, Inc.                 Tennessee                        100%
Kellwood Financial Services, Inc.                  Delaware                         100%
Gerber Childrenswear, Inc.                         Delaware                         100%
Briggs New York, Inc.                              Delaware                         100%
Phat Fashions, LLC                                 New York                         100%


<FN>
* Some of the above subsidiaries also have subsidiaries, which are not
listed because, in the aggregate, they are not considered to be significant.
</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Keystone
Consolidated Industries, Inc.'s consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
consoidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MUTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,701
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,915
<INVENTORY>                                     52,239
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,926
<PP&E>                                         354,682
<DEPRECIATION>                                 198,582
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 405,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          111,371
<BONDS>                                        101,852
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,569
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   405,857
<SALES>                                        370,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               370,828
<CGS>                                          339,625
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  339,625
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,718
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,019
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,006
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,095
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,911
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,911
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
        

</TABLE>
#### SHIELDS, et v SUPREME COUNCIL, RAYAL ARCANUM

Ohio Supreme Court

No 22283.

Decided Nov 19, 1930.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****AQI toolkit for teachers.**
 
2008 | 2013
 
SuDoc Number:EP 4.52:T 22/
Item Number:0483-E-22 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000907230
 
April 2, 2018
§ 1915.113 Shackles and hooks. The provisions of this section shall apply to ship repairing, shipbuilding and shipbreaking. ( a ) *Shackles.* Employers must ensure that shackles: ( 1 ) Have permanently affixed and legible identification markings as prescribed by the manufacturer that indicate the recommended safe working load;
( 2 ) Not be loaded in excess of its recommended safe working load as prescribed on the identification markings by the manufacturer; and
( 3 ) Not be used without affixed and legible identification markings as required by paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section.
( b ) *Hooks.* ( 1 ) The manufacturer's recommendations shall be followed in determining the safe working loads of the various sizes and types of specific and identifiable hooks. All hooks for which no applicable manufacturer's recommendations are available shall be tested to twice the intended safe working load before they are initially put into use. The employer shall maintain and keep readily available a certification record which includes the date of such tests, the signature of the person who performed the test and an identifier for the hook which was tested.
( 2 ) Loads shall be applied to the throat of the hook since loading the point overstresses and bends or springs the hook.
( 3 ) Hooks shall be inspected periodically to see that they have not been bent by overloading. Bent or sprung hooks shall not be used.
[47 FR 16986, Apr. 20, 1982, as amended at 51 FR 34562, Sept. 29, 1986; 76 FR 33609, June 8, 2011]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration

Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, the Working Group assigned by the Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans to study the issue of phased retirement will hold an open public meeting on Thursday, June 1, 2000 in Room N-5437 A-D, U.S. Department of Labor Building, Second and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210.

The purpose of the open meeting, which will run from 9:30 a.m. to approximately noon, is for Working Group members to hear testimony concerning workforce demographic trends and current practices in phased retirement plans.

Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement pertaining to the topic by submitting 20 copies on or before May 26, 200 to Sharon Morrissey, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-5677, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210.  Individuals or representatives of organizations wishing to address the Working Group should forward their request to the Executive Secretary or telephone (202) 219-8753.  Oral presentations will be limited to 10 minutes, but an extended statement may be submitted for the record.  Individuals with disabilities who need special accommodations should contact Sharon Morrissey by May 26 at the address indicated in this notice. 

Organizations or individuals may also submit statements for the record without testifying.  Twenty (20) copies of such statements should be sent to the Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at the above address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record of the meeting if received on or before May 26.

Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of May 2000.

Leslie Kramerich,

Acting Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-12402  Filed 5-16-00; 8:45 am]

                BILLING CODE 4510-29-M                      ( print page 31351)
#### BIDDLE v STATE

Ohio Appeals, 8th Disk, Cuyahoga Co.

No. 9173.

Decided Dec. 3, 1928.

Jack Canfield, Cleveland, for Biddle.

Carl Shuler, Cleveland, for State.

VICKERY J

Now there is no evidence of a sale or attempted sale, nor is there any evidence of any circumstances that would lead one to believe that there w,as a trafficking in liquor in this house other than the mere presence of three and a half gallons of alcohol. Of course if the analysis had shown that these two hundred bottles of near-beer or home-brew, whatever it might be, contained a percentage of alcohol in violation of law, the quantity might be such that an inference might be drawm that so much material W'ould not be there unless it was for the purpose of trafficking in liquor.

It is argued that the case comes squarely within the case of Bender vs. Addams et al, 26 O L R, 128, decided March 5th, 1928, by this court and a motion in that case to certify was refused by the Supreme Court. This court laid down the proposition in that case that the mere presence of liquor in a private house, unattached to any business place, vras not necessarily a violation of law; that there must be a trafficking, not necessarily evidence or proof of a sale of liquor, but such activity from which a court might infer that there had been a trafficking or that the liquor was there for the purpose of being trafficked in. As the evidence now stands in thjs case, — for we must say that the record is very, very meager, — it does not show that there has been a trafficking in liquor in these premises.

*37The judgment of the court is, therefore, contrary to the weight of the evidence and is pot supported by sufficient evidence. The judgment of the court will, therefore, be reversed and the cause remanded to the Municipal Court for a new trial'.

Sullivan, P J and Levine J, concur.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Cave Junction quadrangle,Oregon : 7.5-minute series (topographic)**
 
2012 | 2014 | 2015
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28/6:42123-B 6/
Item Number:0080-G-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000933100
 
February 7, 2018
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elgrande.com, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael F.
Holloran, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.

                                                 /s/ Michael F. Holloran
                                                 ----------------------------
                                                         Michael F. Holloran
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Principal Financial Officer

January 14, 2003
§ 18.85 Privileged, sensitive, or classified material. ( a ) *Exclusion.* On motion of any interested person or the judge's own, the judge may limit the introduction of material into the record or issue orders to protect against undue disclosure of privileged communications, or sensitive or classified matters. The judge may admit into the record a summary or extract that omits the privileged, sensitive or classified material.
( b ) *Sealing the record.* ( 1 ) On motion of any interested person or the judge's own, the judge may order any material that is in the record to be sealed from public access. The motion must propose the fewest redactions possible that will protect the interest offered as the basis for the motion. A redacted copy or summary of any material sealed must be made part of the public record unless the necessary redactions would be so extensive that the public version would be meaningless, or making even a redacted version or summary available would defeat the reason the original is sealed.
( 2 ) An order that seals material must state findings and explain why the reasons to seal adjudicatory records outweigh the presumption of public access. Sealed materials must be placed in a clearly marked, separate part of the record. Notwithstanding the judge's order, all parts of the record remain subject to statutes and regulations pertaining to public access to agency records.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science announces the following meeting.

*Name:*                         Advisory Panel for Genetics (1149) (Panel C).                    

*Date and Time:*                         Monday & Tuesday, June 5-6, 2000, 9 A.M.—5 P.M.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Room 320, Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Philip Harriman, Program Director, (703) 306-1439, Program Director for Microbial Observatories, Room 655, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate research proposals submitted to the Microbial Observatories Program as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information, financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: May 12, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-12452 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
EXHIBIT 7

                          ULTRAPETROL (BAHAMAS) LIMITED

<TABLE>
                 STATEMENT OF RATIO OF EARNING TO FIXED CHARGES
<CAPTION>
                                                            Year Ended December 31,
                                                            -----------------------
                                                            (Dollars in thousands)

                                       2002           2003           2004         2005         2006
                                       ----           ----           ----         ----         ----
<S>                                 <C>            <C>            <C>          <C>         <C>
Consolidated income (loss) before
income tax and minority interest    $  (13,571)    $  (10,000)        $6,921      $25,151     $14,646

Investment in affiliates                    45         (3,140)          (406)         497        (588)

Interest expense                        16,178(1)      15,622(1)      15,566       18,104      18,275(1)

Amortization of debt issue costs           585            585            568        1,037         750
                                    ----------     ----------     ----------   ----------  ----------

Earnings                                 3,237          3,067         22,649       44,789      33,083
                                    ==========     ==========     ==========   ==========  ==========


Interest expenses (1)                   16,178         15,622         15,566       18,104      18,275

Amortization of debt issue costs           585            585            568        1,037         750
                                    ----------     ----------     ----------   ----------  ----------

Fixed charges                           16,763         16,207         16,134       19,141      19,025
                                    ==========     ==========     ==========   ==========  ==========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges         -  (2)         -  (2)         1.4          2.3         1.7
                                                                         ---          ---         ---
</TABLE>

(1)  The interest expense amounts presented in this exhibit do not include the
     results on extinguishment of debt amounting $ 1,782, $ (5,078) and $(1,411)
     for the year ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2006, respectively.

(2)  In these fiscal years the earnings are inadequate to cover fixed charges.