alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1



                       CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

William R. Fairbanks, the chief executive officer of American Sports Development
Group, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:

     1.   The  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB,  as  amended,  for the  fiscal
          quarter  ended  June 30,  2002 of the  Company  (the  "Report")  fully
          complies  with  the   requirements  of  section  13(a)  or  15(d),  as
          applicable,  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

The foregoing certification is made solely for the purpose of complying with the
requirements  of Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.
1350)  and  may not be  relied  upon  by  anyone  for  any  other  purpose.  The
undersigned  expressly  disclaims any undertaking to update such  certifications
except as required by law.


Date:  August 20, 2002.

                                    /s/ William R. Fairbanks
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    William R. Fairbanks,
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of the Application of The Board of Estimate and Apportionment of the City of New York Relative to Carrying Eliot Avenue Across the Right of Way of the New York Connecting Railroad Company. The City of New York, Appellant; Transit Commission of the State of New York et al., Respondents.

Argued May 26, 1937;

decided June 11, 1937.

*619
      *Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel (Paxton Blair, Joseph L. Weiner*and *Arthur A. Segall*of counsel), for appellant.

*Madison G. Gonterman*and *Gilbert N. Peed*for New York Connecting Railroad Company, respondent.

*Frank C. Bowers, Wallace A. Kroger*and *George H. Stover*for Transit Commission, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
#### HEFFNER v CUYAHOGA EQUIPMENT CO.

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co.

No. 10622.

Decided. June 16, 1930

Allison M. Gibbons, Cleveland, for Heffner.

Eugene A. McCabe, Cleveland, for Company.

SHERICK, J. (5th Dist) and MIDDLETON and MAUCK, JJ (4th Dist) sitting.

*478lilAUCK, J.

The case is before us upon a very meagre bill of exceptions that in the most general w,ay recites only the tendency of a part of the testimony. It is wholly impossible for us to say, in view of this very abbreviated record, that the trial court with all the tesimony before it abused its discretion in refusing the defendant’s request to amend. Necessarily the right to amend is one resting within the sound discretion of the trial court. It is only under the most unusual circumstances that a reviewing court can hold that the trial court has erred in its exercise of that discretion. Manifestly where so short a record is presented to the reviewing court as we have in this case it is out of the question for us to give serious consideration to such a claim.

Taking the answer of the defendant as it is, it will be observed that from the language above quoted the defendant pleaded a tender by him of the trucks sold to him and the plaintiff’s acceptance of that tender, thereby setting up an independent contract that would wholly have defeated the plaintiff’s action upon the notes if sustained by the evidence. The record in this case does not show that that averment was true, nor does it even show that there was any evidence at all tending to sustain the same. The trial court was consequently right in limiting the defendant to such credits as he could show by way of damages within the limits which he had set up as the measure of those damages in his answer, to-wit, the sum of eight hundred dollars. The jury allowed him all he claimed in that respect and he received the utmost relief to which he was entitled under the pleadings so far as this short bill of exceptions discloses.

■The judgment is consequently .affirmed.

Sherick and Middleton, JJ, concur.
#### FOURTH & CENTRAL TRUST CO v ROWE, Admr Etc.

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21789.

Decided Feb. 19, 1930

Marshall, CJ., Kinkade, Robinson, Jones, Matthias and Allen, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Michael F. Holloran, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Elgrande.com, Inc.;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report  does not  contain any  untrue

statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make

the statements made, in light of the  circumstances under which such statements

were made, not misleading with respect to  the period covered by this quarterly

report; and



3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial

information included in this quarterly report, fairly present, in  all material

respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows  of the

registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.



4.  The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.  The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting;



/s/ Michael F. Holloran

---------------------------------------

Michael F. Holloran,

Chief Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer



Date: January 14, 2005
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Don Edwards San Francisco BayNational Wildlife Refuge : final comprehensive conservation plan**
 
Report
Appendices:One | Two
 
SuDoc Number:I 49.44/3-2:D 71
Item Number:0612-C-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000930335
 
March 27, 2018
EXHIBIT
12
 
 
 **KENTUCKY
POWER COMPANY**
 **Computation
of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges**
 **(in
thousands except ratio data)**
 
 **Year
      Ended December 31,****2000**
    
    **2001**
    
    **2002**
    
    **2003**
    
    **2004****FIXED
      CHARGES**Interest
      on First Mortgage Bonds
    
    $
    9,503
    
    $
    6,178
    
    $
    2,206
    
    $
    -
    
    $
    -Interest
      on Other Long-term Debt
    
    
    16,367
    
    
    18,300
    
    
    23,429
    
    
    26,467
    
    
    27,051Interest
      on Short-term Debt
    
    
    3,295
    
    
    2,329
    
    
    1,751
    
    
    1,104
    
    
    697Miscellaneous
      Interest Charges
    
    
    2,523
    
    
    1,059
    
    
    1,084
    
    
    1,772
    
    
    1,956Estimated
      Interest Element in Lease Rentals
    
    
    1,700
    
    
    1,200
    
    
    1,000
    
    
    600
    
    
    700**Total
      Fixed Charges**
    
    $
    33,388
    
    $
    29,066
    
    $
    29,470
    
    $
    29,943
    
    $
    30,404**EARNINGS**Income
      Before Cumulative Effect
      ofAccounting
      Change
    
    $
    20,763
    
    $
    21,565
    
    $
    20,567
    
    $
    33,464
    
    $
    25,905Plus
      Federal Income Taxes
    
    
    17,884
    
    
    9,553
    
    
    9,235
    
    
    9,764
    
    
    8,974Plus
      State Income Taxes (Credits)
    
    
    2,457
    
    
    489
    
    
    1,627
    
    
    (89
    )
    
    (303
    )Plus
      Fixed Charges (as above)
    
    
    33,388
    
    
    29,066
    
    
    29,470
    
    
    29,943
    
    
    30,404**Total
      Earnings**
    
    $
    74,492
    
    $
    60,673
    
    $
    60,899
    
    $
    73,082
    
    $
    64,980**Ratio
      of Earnings to Fixed Charges**
    
    
    2.23
    
    
    2.08
    
    
    2.06
    
    
    2.44
    
    
    2.13
| Name of Corporation                        | Jurisdiction ofIncorporationor Organization | Percent ofVoting Securities Held (1) |
|--------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                       |                                        |                                      |
|   FV Steel and Wire Company(2)   | Wisconsin                                   | 100.0%                                    |
|                                       |                                        |                                      |
|   Engineered Wire Products, Inc. | Ohio                                        | 100.0%                                    |
|                                       |                                        |                                      |
|   Keystone Energy Resources, LLC | Delaware                                    | 100.0%                                    |
|                                       |                                        |                                      |
|   Keystone-Calumet, Inc.         | Delaware                                    | 100.0%                                    |
|                                       |                                        |                                      |
|   Sherman Wire Company           | Delaware                                    | 100.0%                                    |
#### § 23.250 Frequency of pay.

Wage payments to workers shall be made no later than one pay period following the end of the regular pay period in which such wages were earned or accrued. A pay period under Executive Order 14026 may not be of any duration longer than semi-monthly.
§ 93.325 Quarterly reporting. ( a ) Each certificate holder must submit in writing, within 30 days of the end of each calendar quarter, the total number of commercial SFRA operations conducted for that quarter. Quarterly reports must be filed with the responsible Flight Standards Office.
( b ) Each quarterly report must contain the following information. ( 1 ) Make and model of aircraft;
( 2 ) Identification number (registration number) for each aircraft;
( 3 ) Departure airport for each segment flown;
( 4 ) Departure date and actual Universal Coordinated Time, as applicable for each segment flown;
( 5 ) Type of operation; and
( 6 ) Route(s) flown.
[65 FR 17733, Apr. 4, 2000 as amended by Amdt. 93-102, 83 FR 48213, Sept. 24, 2018]
<PAGE>


                                                                Exhibit 23



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-40362 of The Laclede Group, Inc. and Laclede Gas Company and
Registration Statement Nos. 333-86722 and 33-52357 of The Laclede Group,
Inc. and 333-86722-01 of Laclede Capital Trust I on Form S-3 and in
Registration Statement Nos. 333-90248, 333-90252, 333-90254 and 333-91432 of
The Laclede Group, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated November 19, 2002
(December 2, 2002 as to the last paragraph of Note 13) (relating to the
financial statements of The Laclede Group, Inc.) appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of The Laclede Group, Inc. and Laclede Gas Company for
the year ended September 30, 2002.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-40362 of The Laclede Group, Inc. and Laclede Gas Company on Form S-3
of our report dated November 19, 2002 (relating to the financial statements
of Laclede Gas Company) appearing in Exhibit 99.1 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of The Laclede Group, Inc. and Laclede Gas Company for the year
ended September 30, 2002.




Deloitte & Touche
St. Louis, MO
December 5, 2002
Exhibit 23

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Independent Auditors' Consent

 

 

The Board of Directors

LaBarge, Inc.:

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements No. 33-53583 and No. 33-31330 on Form S-8 of LaBarge, Inc. of our report dated August 15, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of LaBarge, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows, and related schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 29, 2003, which report appears in the June 29, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K/A of LaBarge, Inc.

Our report refers to a change in accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets.

 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

St. Louis, Missouri

September 11, 2003
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Christian Faith Missionary Baptist Church

Appellate case number: 01-14-00057-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-73452

Trial court: 127th District Court of Harris County

On February 5, 2014, counsel for Real Parties in Interest filed a Motion of Extension of 

Time to File Response. The motion is GRANTED. The response of Real Parties in Interest to 

the Petition for Writ of Mandamus, if any, is due March 3, 2014. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 20, 2014
§ 1960.40 Establishment committee duties. ( a ) The safety and health committee is an integral part of the safety and health program, and helps ensure effective implementation of the program at the establishment level.
( b ) An establishment committee formed under this subpart shall, except where prohibited by law: ( 1 ) Monitor and assist the safety and health program at establishments under its jurisdiction and make recommendations to the official in charge on the operation of the program;
( 2 ) Monitor findings and reports of workplace inspections to confirm that appropriate corrective measures are implemented;
( 3 ) When requested by the agency Safety and Health Official, or when the committee deems it necessary for effective monitoring of agency establishment inspection procedures, participate in inspections of the establishment;
( 4 ) Review internal and external evaluation reports and make recommendations concerning the establishment safety and health program;
( 5 ) Review, and recommend changes, as appropriate, to procedures for handling safety and health suggestions and recommendations from employees;
( 6 ) When requested by the Designated Agency Safety and Health Official, or when the committee deems it necessary, comment on standards proposed pursuant to the provisions of subpart C of this part;
( 7 ) Monitor and recommend changes, as required, in the level of resources allocated and spent on the establishment safety and health program;
( 8 ) Review agency responses to reports of hazardous conditions, safety and health program deficiencies, and allegations of reprisal;
( 9 ) Report their dissatisfaction to the Secretary if half a committee determines there are deficiencies in the establishment's safety and health program or is not satisfied with the agency's reports of reprisal investigations; and
( 10 ) Request the Secretary to conduct an evaluation or inspection if half the members of record are not satisfied with an agency's response to a report of hazardous working conditions.
#### § 1601.34 Rules to be liberally construed.

These rules and regulations shall be liberally construed to effectuate the purpose and provisions of title VII, the ADA, GINA, and the PWFA.

[44 FR 4670, Jan. 23, 1979. Redesignated and amended at 56 FR 9624, 9625, Mar. 7, 1991; 74 FR 63983, Dec. 7, 2009; 89 FR 11169, Feb. 14, 2024]
#### CLEVELAND. ASHTABULA. CONNEAUT BUS CO v RALPH

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9229.

Decided Jan 21, 1929

McConnell, Blackmore & Cory, Cleveland, for Bus Co.

J P Corrigan, Cleveland, for Ralph.

MIDDLETON, PJ and MAUCK, J of the Fourth Dist and FARR, J of the Seventh Dist sitting

MAUCK, J.

The plaintiff’s claim was that she- was travelling south on Wymore Aye. in the city of East Cleveland and was passing out of that avenue on Euclid Avenue with the purpose of making a left hand turn in order to proceed east on Euclid. Euclid Avenue is the main thoroughfare' and the plaintiff w,as required to stop before entering thereon. She .claimed to have done so and to have proceeded slowly across the street and in front of the oncoming bus which struck her. The contention that the plaintiff testified herself out of court is based upon what the record shows her to have said on page ten. She there says that “I was crossing over to the western car track when I observed this bus which until now I had not noticed was coming rapidly.” Plaintiff in *216error says that the plaintiff has thus testified that she never noticed the bus until she, was on the street car track and that as she could have seen it, if she had looked, she manifestly did not look and was, therefore, guilty of contributory negligence. The plaintiff had, however, elsewhere testified that she had stopped her car before passing into Euclid Avenue and had seen the bus.

William Sylls, also testifying on plaintiff’s behalf, indicates that plaintiff made a stop at the required point, and a reading of the" plaintiff’s testimony as a whole, together with that of Mr. Sylls, clearly makes a case to go to the jury, unless the foregoing quotation unqualifiedly establishes the contributory negligence of Mrs. Ralph. We think that it does not do so. The jury may well have understood that what the plaintiff was trying to say was that until she was on the car track she had not noticed the rapidity with the bus was moving. If the jury so understood her, manifestly there was a, case to go to the jury.

Whether the judgment is supported by sufficient testimony is a more doubtful proposition. It is difficult for one to get an idea of what actually occurred at the time of this collision from a reading of the testimony. Almost every witness contradicted some feature of the testimony of every other witness and a considerable number of the witnesses, not satisfied with this, contradict themselves. The plaintiff in error particularly urged upon us the strength of the testimony of Mr. Kapitzky. That witness undoubtedly makes a strong case for the defendant. Unfortunately, however, for the defendant, Mr. Kapitzky is in sharp contradiction to the testimony of the bus driver himself. Likewise is the testimony of Miss Iddings., She makes a strong, showing against the plaintiff, but her testimony not only contradicts all of the testimony adduced in behalf of the plaintiff, but much of that offered by the defendant, and she further contradicts herself.

In view of the labyrinth of contradictions in the testimony, we conclude that the finding of the jury cannot be disturbed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certificationof the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the**

**Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

 

I,Herbert Lindo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the AnnualReport of Kenilworth Systems Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchAnnual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Kenilworth SystemsCorporation.

 
| By:    | /s/  Herbert Lindo       |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Herbert  Lindo           |
| Title: | Chief  Financial Officer |
| Date:  | July 5,  2005       |

 

1

----
# L_2005326EN.01004002.xml

| 13.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 326/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 326/40

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 of 26 September 2000 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of television camera systems originating in Japan

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities L 244 of 29 September 2000
  )

In the Annex on page 50, under the company name ‘Hitachi’, in the column ‘Viewfinder’, the entries ‘GM-9 (1)’ and ‘GM-51 (1)’ shall be added.

1

1

On page 52, under the company name ‘JVC’, in the column ‘Viewfinder’:

for:

‘VF-P116’,

read:

‘VF-P116E’.

---