alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, David M. Gernak, Chief Financial Officer of Patriot
Motorcycle Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Patriot Motorcycle Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness
of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small
business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 26, 2007



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DAVID M. GERNAK    
|David M. Gernak        
|Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                         -------------------------------

July 21, 2006

Board of Directors
Gateway Distributors, Ltd.
Las Vegas, NV

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Form 10-KSB/A filed
on or about July 21, 2006 of the report dated March 28, 2005, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Gateway Distributors, Ltd. for the year
ended December 31, 2004, and to our inclusion as a named expert. Our report
included an explanatory paragraph regarding the substantial doubt about
Gateway's ability to continue as a going concern.


/s/  Madsen & Associates CPA's, Inc.

Madsen & Associates CPA's, Inc.
684 East Vine St #3
Murray, Utah 84107
§ 16.105 Eligibility of applicants. ( a ) To be eligible for an award of attorney fees and other expenses under the Act, the applicant must be a party, as that term is defined in 5 U.S.C. 551(3), to an adversary adjudication for which it seeks an award; the applicant must prevail; and must meet all the conditions of eligibility set out in this subpart and subpart B.
( b ) To be eligible for an award, the applicant must be: ( 1 ) An individual with a net worth of not more than $1 million;
( 2 ) The sole owner of an unincorporated business which has a net worth of not more than $5 million, including both personal and business interests, and not more than 500 employees;
( 3 ) A charitable or other tax exempt organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) with not more than 500 employees;
( 4 ) A cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 1141j(a)) with not more than 500 employees;
( 5 ) Any other partnership, corporation, association or public or private organization with a net worth of not more than $5 million and not more than 500 employees. A unit of state or local government is not a public organization within the meaning of this provision.
( c ) For purposes of eligibility, the net worth and number of employees of an applicant shall be determined as of the date the proceeding was initiated.
( d ) An applicant who owns an unincorporated business will be considered as an *individual* rather than a *sole owner of an unincorporated business* if the issues on which the applicant prevails are related primarily to personal interests rather than to business interests.
( e ) The employees of an applicant include all persons who perform services for remuneration for the applicant, under the applicant's direction and control. Part-time employees shall be included.
( f ) The net worth and number of employees of the applicant and all of its affiliates shall be aggregated to determine eligibility. Any individual, corporation or other entity that directly or indirectly controls or owns a majority of the voting shares of another business, or controls, *in any manner,* the election of a majority of that business' board of directors, trustees or other persons exercising similar functions, shall be considered an affiliate for purposes of this part, unless the adjudicative officer determines that such treatment would be unjust and contrary to the purposes of the Act in light of the actual relationship between the affiliated entities. In addition, the adjudicative officer may determine that financial relationships of the applicant other than those described in this paragraph constitute special circumstances that would make an award unjust.
( g ) An applicant that participates in a proceeding primarily on behalf of one or more other persons or entities that would be ineligible is not itself eligible for an award.
[46 FR 63021, Dec. 29, 1981, as amended at 72 FR 37098, July 9, 2007]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 98 (Friday, May 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12679]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigations Nos. 731-TA-846-850 (Final)]


Certain Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and 
Pressure Pipe From the Czech Republic, Japan, Mexico, Romania, and 
South Africa

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Revised schedule for the subject investigations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 12, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob Carr (202-205-3402), Office of 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information 
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special 
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the 
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning 
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server 
(http://www.usitc.gov).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 3, 2000, the Department of Commerce 
notified the Commission of its final determinations with regard to 
Japan and South Africa. The Commission must make its final 
determinations in antidumping investigations within 45 days after 
notification of Commerce's final determinations, or in this case by 
June 16, 2000. The Commission is revising its schedule to conform with 
this statutory deadline.
    The Commission's new schedule for these investigations is as 
follows: the Commission will make its final release of information on 
May 31, 2000; and final party comments are due on June 5, 2000.
    For further information concerning these investigations see the 
Commission's notice cited above and the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and 
part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207).

    Authority: These investigations are being conducted under 
authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is 
published pursuant to section 207.21 of the Commission's rules.

    Issued: May 16, 2000.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-12679 Filed 5-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### § 22.42 Judicial review.

Section 3805 of title 31 U.S.C., authorizes judicial review by an appropriate United States District Court of a final decision of the authority head imposing penalties or assessments under this part and specifies the procedures for such review.
----

Action brought on 23 June 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-262/04)

(2004/C 201/29)

An action against the Federal Republic of Germany was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 23 June 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Walter Mölls and Karolina Mojzesowicz, of the Commission's Legal Service, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

Under Article 9 of Commission Directive 2002/77/EC, Member States were to supply to the Commission by not later than 24 July 2003 such information as would allow the Commission to confirm that the provisions of that directive have been complied with. That period has expired without the Federal Republic of Germany supplying to the Commission the information required under Article 9.

----

(1)  OJ L 249, p. 21.

----
# EUR-Lex - 32000D0061 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000D0061

**2000/61/EC: Commission Decision of 21 December 1999 amending Decision 93/436/EEC laying down special conditions governing imports of fishery products originating in Chile (notified under document number C(1999) 4749) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 022 , 27/01/2000 P. 0062 - 0064 *

COMMISSION DECISION

of 21 December 1999

amending Decision 93/436/EEC laying down special conditions governing imports of fishery products originating in Chile

(notified under document number C(1999) 4749)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2000/61/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products(1), as last amended by the Directive 97/79/EC(2), and in particular Article 11 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) the health certificate for fishery products originating in Chile and intended for export to the European Community was established by Commission Decision 93/436/EEC of 30 June 1993 laying down special conditions governing imports of fishery products originating in Chile(3), as last amended by Decision 96/674/EC(4);

(2) the conditions for the import of bivalve molluscs, echinoderms tunicates and marine gastropods originating in Chile are laid down by Commission Decision 96/675/EC(5);

(3) the legislative references cited in the model of the health certificate included in Annex A to Decision 93/436/EEC contain certain mistakes, and it is therefore necessary to modify it;

(4) the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex A to Decision 93/436/EEC shall be replaced by the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Decision is addresed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 December 1999.

For the Commission

David BYRNE

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 15.

(2) OJ L 24, 30.1.1998, p. 31.

(3) OJ L 202, 12.8.1993, p. 31.

(4) OJ L 313, 3.12.1996, p. 29.

(5) OJ L 313, 3.12.1996, p. 38.

ANNEX

"ANNEX A

>PIC FILE= "L_2000022EN.006303.EPS">

>PIC FILE= "L_2000022EN.006401.EPS">"
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21

<TABLE>
PARENTS AND SUBSIDIARIES

The Company and its subsidiaries* as of April 2, 2002 are as follows:

<CAPTION>
                                              State (Country) of            Percentage of Voting
Name of Company                                 Incorporation                 Securities Owned
---------------                               ------------------            --------------------
<S>                                         <C>                                        <C>
Kellwood Company                              Delaware                                  Parent
American Recreation Products, Inc.            Delaware                                   100%
Kellwood Asia Limited                         Hong Kong                                  100%
Smart Shirts Limited                          Hong Kong                                  100%
South Asia Garment Limited                    Hong Kong                                  100%
KWD Holdings, Inc.                            Delaware                                   100%
Robert Scott & David Brooks
  Outlet Stores, Inc.                         Delaware                                   100%
Tri-W Corporation                             North Carolina                             100%
Halmode Apparel, Inc.                         Delaware                                   100%
Koret of California, Inc.                     California                                 100%
Koret Outlet Stores, Inc.                     Delaware                                   100%
Biflex International, Inc.                    New York                                   100%
Kellwood Financial Resources, Inc.            Tennessee                                  100%
Kellwood Shared Services, Inc.                Delaware                                   100%
Dorby Frocks, Ltd.                            New York                                   100%
Group B Clothing Co., Inc.                    Delaware                                   100%


<FN>
*        Some of the above subsidiaries also have subsidiaries which are not
         listed because, in the aggregate, they are not considered to be
         significant.

</TABLE>
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Population and Prevelance /
              - 1.14 Change in Civilians with Disabilities Living in the Community for the U.S.-2011-2012

## Table 1.14: Change in Civilians with Disabilities Living in the Community for the United States and States: 2011 to 2012

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 93 

To authorize NTIA to borrow against anticipated receipts of the Digital 

Television Transition and Public Safety Fund to initiate migration to 

a national IP-enabled emergency network capable of receiving and responding to all citizen activated emergency communications. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. STEVENS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To authorize NTIA to borrow against anticipated receipts 

of the Digital Television Transition and Public Safety 

Fund to initiate migration to a national IP-enabled emergency network capable of receiving and responding to 

all citizen activated emergency communications. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘911 Modernization 

5 Act’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 93 IS 

1 SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR PROGRAM. 

2 Section 3011 of Public Law 109–171 (47 U.S.C. 309 

3 note) is amended— 

4 (1) by striking ‘‘The’’ and inserting: 

5 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL—The’’; and 

6 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(b) CREDIT.—The Assistant Secretary may borrow 

8 from the Treasury, upon enactment of this provision, such 

9 sums as necessary, but not to exceed $43,500,000 to im10 plement this section. The Assistant Secretary shall reim11 burse the Treasury, without interest, as funds are depos12 ited into the Digital Television Transition and Public 

13 Safety Fund.’’. 

14 SEC. 3. NTIA COORDINATION OF E–911 IMPLEMENTATION. 

15 Section 158(b)(4) of the National Telecommuni16 cations and Information Administration Organization Act 

17 (47 U.S.C. 942(b)(4)) is amended by adding at the end 

18 thereof the following: ‘‘Within 180 days after the date of 

19 enactment of the 911 Modernization Act, the Assistant 

20 Secretary and the Administrator shall jointly issue regula21 tions updating the criteria to provide priority for public 

22 safety answering points not capable, as of the date of en23 actment of that Act, of receiving 911 calls.’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
§ 2570.99 Review by the Secretary. ( a ) The Secretary may review a decision of an administrative law judge. Such a review may occur only when a party files a notice of appeal from a decision of an administrative law judge within twenty (20) days of the issuance of such decision. In all other cases, the decision of the administrative law judge shall become final agency action within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 704.
( b ) A notice of appeal to the Secretary shall state with specificity the issue(s) in the decision of the administrative law judge on which the party is seeking review. Such notice of appeal must be served on all parties of record.
( c ) Upon receipt of a notice of appeal, the Secretary shall request the Chief Administrative Law Judge to submit to him or her a copy of the entire record before the administrative law judge.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.33 Access to employee exposure and medical records.

Note:

The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1020 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-1910.1020).

[[61 FR 31431](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31431), June 20, 1996]
#### ITT UNITED STATES TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, INC. v CONNELL PUBLICATIONS, INC., etc.

Case No. 85-073 AP

Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Appellate Division, Dade County

October 8, 1986

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Lee B. Gartner for appellant.

Steven Silverman for appellee.

Before BARAD, GOLDMAN, FEDER, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

FREDERICK N. BARAD, Judge.

Appellant belatedly filed an amended complaint which Appellee moved to strike as being untimely filed. Although Appellee’s motion *126was denied and attorney’s fees were not pled, the trial court ordered that attorney’s fees be assessed against the Appellant for “the necessity of [Appellee] filing said Motion.”

It is an elemental principle of law in Florida that attorney’s fees may be awarded (1) where authorized by contract; (2) where authorized by a constitutional legislative enactment; and (3) where awarded for services performed by an attorney in creating or bringing into the court a fund or other property. *Miller v. Colonial Baking Co. of Alabama,*402 So.2d 1365 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). When authorized, attorney’s fees must be specifically claimed in the pleadings. *Johnson v. Johnson,*346 So.2d 591 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

The trial court erred in awarding unauthorized attorney’s fees to the Appellee who had neither pled nor proved its entitlement to such an award. Accordingly, that part of the trial court’s order awarding attorney’s fees is reversed.
Exhibit-23


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
One City Centre
St. Louis, MO 63101

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-52357 of Laclede Gas Company and its subsidiary companies on Form S-3 and
in Registration Statement Nos. 33-38413, 33-57573 and 33-64933 of Laclede
Gas Company and its subsidiary companies on Form S-8 of our report dated
November 18, 1999, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Laclede
Gas Company and its subsidiary companies for the year ended September 30,
1999.


Deloitte & Touche LLP

December 16, 1999

































                                 102
[No. 49808-8-I.

Division One.

December 2, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. A.V., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 01-8-00880-5, Nicole Maclnnes, J., entered December 3, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.