alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Economic Injury Disaster #9H25] 

New London County and the contiguous counties of Hartford, Middlesex, Tolland, and Windham in Connecticut, and Kent and Washington Counties in Rhode Island constitute an economic injury disaster loan area as a result of a fire that occurred on March 6, 2000 in the Village of Mystic, in the Town of Groton. Eligible small businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere may file applications for economic injury assistance as a result of this disaster until the close of business on February 2, 2001 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 1 Office, 360 Rainbow Blvd, South, 3rd Floor, Niagara Falls, NY 14303. 

The interest rate for eligible small businesses and small agricultural cooperatives is 4 percent. 

The economic injury number for the State of Rhode Island is 9H2600. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59002) 

Dated: May 8, 2000. 

Kris Swedin, 

Acting Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 00-12693 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Elizabeth Tucker as Administratrix of the Estate of J. W. Tucker, Sr., deceased, and Albert Tucker, Administrator of the Estate of J. W. Tucker, Jr., Deceased, Appellants, v. Ernest Yager, Lizzie E. Lewis, and R. B. Sturkie, as Special Master, Appellees.

Pasco County, Florida.

Dayton & Dayton, Attorneys for Appellants.

Appeal dismissed November 13th, 1911, on praecipe'of counsel for Appellants.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of 24/7 RealMedia, Inc. (the “**Company**”)on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I, Jonathan K. Hsu, ExecutiveVice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

April 9,2007

|   | /s/ Jonathan K. Hsu                                                            |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer  and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)                                   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM KELLWOOD
COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCED SHEET AT APRIL 30,
1999, AND FROM THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 1999,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                          25,482
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  403,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,281
<INVENTORY>                                    340,778
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               797,280
<PP&E>                                         252,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                 149,988
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,054,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          331,745
<BONDS>                                        227,659
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       163,097
<OTHER-SE>                                     283,091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,054,212
<SALES>                                      2,151,147
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,151,147
<CGS>                                        1,685,281
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,685,281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               392,830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,868
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,883
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,153
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,953
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,953
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-104101, 333-84582, 333-62600,333-56906, 333-59959, 333-73015, and 333-33720) pertaining to the Actuate Corporation 1998 Equity Incentive Plan, Actuate Corporation 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Actuate Corporation 1998 Non-Employee Directors Option Plan, Actuate Corporation2001 Supplemental Stock Option Plan, First Amended and Restated Tidestone Technologies, Inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan of 1999 and Tidestone Technologies, Inc. 1998 Incentive Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos.333-67220 and 333-34410) of Actuate Corporation and in the related prospectuses of our report dated January 26, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Actuate Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

San Francisco, California 

March 9, 2004
#### Robert L. KRUSE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert E. HAMPTON et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 74-2769.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 30, 1975.

William H. McDermott, Mobile, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Charles S. White-Spunner, U. S. Atty., Irwin W. Coleman, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., *1232Mobile, Ala., Morton Hollander, Eloise E. Davies, Stephen F. Eilperin, Washington, D. C., Dept, of Justice, for defendants-appellees.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and GEWIN and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the briefs and the record, and the contentions of the parties at oral argument, we have determined that appellants have failed to demonstrate error. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of the district court opinion. 394 F.Supp. 764 (S.D.Ala. 1975).

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted), I, Susan Santage, Chief Executive Officer and  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:
 
 1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "PERIODIC REPORT") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
 
 Dated: February 9, 2010
 
 
 / S/Susan Santage
 Susan Santage
 CEO & CFO
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Yummies, Inc. and will be retained by Yummies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
 
 THIS CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SS. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED "FILED" BY THE COMPANY FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.
#### FLETCHER v STATE

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9743.

Decided Mar 18, 1929

H T Gassaway, Cleveland, for Fletcher.

Alfred DeLorenzo, Cleveland, for State.

VICKERY, PJ.

An examination of the record in this case shows that Lillian Fletcher was living upstairs in a double house with an upstairs and a downstairs suite; that her father occupied the downstairs suite and the officers, having investigated the complaints about the conduct of the upper tenant of this house occupied by Mrs. Fletcher, went to the place with a John Doe search warrant, and inasmuch as the father of. the plaintiff sat in the doorway which was the common entrance to both suites, they procured ,a ladder and put it up against the side of .the house and entered through a window and there found Mrs. Fletcher with several guests. They discovered a gallon jug of two quarts of what is called “White Mule”, which was a liquid containing .more than the percentage of alcohol, allowed by law, and was fit for beverage purposes. There were four men in the suite and three men were on the way towards the suite which indicated very clearly under the circumstances of this case that the plaintiff in error was trafficking in intoxicating liquor. The court so found and we think rightfully.

The question of a John Doe warrant becomes unimportant in view of the circumstances found after they got into this apartment occupied by the plaintiff in error and what they found .there. That brings it clearly within the Miller law, and while one might doubt the wisdom or propriety of issuing a John Doe search warrant where the name of the occupant of the building to be searched is known, or could with reasonable diligence be ascertained, yet as the circumstances developed in this case, that became a matter of minor importance.

We find no error in this record and the judgment will, therefore, be affirmed.

Sullivan and Levine, JJ, concur.
#### Nathaniel Fowle *versus*Samuel W. Kirkland

In this case it was resolved, that before the action of account was abolished by the Revised Stat. c. 118, § 43, such an action was maintainable by a goldsmith and retailer of wares appertaining to that trade, against his former partner in the same business, who, after the dissolution of the partnership, became the receiver of moneys coming to their common profit, to render an account when requested.

*Huntington,*for the defendant.

*Strong*and *Forbes,*for the plaintiff.

It was also *resolved,*that where an action of account was commenced before that form of action was abolished by the Revised Statutes, it might be prosecuted to final judgment after they had gone into operation, the rights which the plaintiff acquired upon the commencement of the action being saved by the Revised Stat. c. 146, § 5.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a Special Committee 193/EUROCAE Working Group 44 meeting to be held June 5-9, 2000, starting at 9 a.m. The meeting will be held at The Sweetbrier Inn, 7125 SW Nyberg Road, Tualatin, Oregon 97062 (South of Portland).

The agenda will be as follows: 

### June 5 Opening Plenary Session

(1) Welcome and Introductions

(2) Review/Approval of Meeting Agenda 

(3) Review Summary of the Previous Meeting

(4) Discussion of Interface Issues between Subgroups 2 and 3; 

1 p.m. (5) Subgroup 2—Terrain and Obstacle Databases;

(a) Review of Summary of the Previous Meeting

(b) Review of Actions Items

(c) Review of the Draft Document 

(d) Other Subgroup 2 Activities 

(6) Subgroup 3—Airport Databases:

(a) Review of Previous Meeting Minutes

(b) Review of Actions Items

(c) Presentations

(d) Review of the Draft Document

### June 6-8

(7) Subgroup 2—Continuation of Discussions

(8) Subgroup 3—Continuation of Discussions.

### June 9 Closing Plenary Session

(9) Summary of Subgroups 2 and 3 Meetings 

(10) Assign Tasks

(11) Other business

(12) Dates and Locations of Next Meeting

(13) Closing.

Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone), (202) 833-9434 (fax), or http://www.rtca.org (web site) or the on-site contact, Mr. Walter Johnson, at (503) 443-3321 or email walt_johnson@fltdyn.com. Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

Issued in Washington, DC, on May 5, 2000.

Janice L. Peters,

Designated Official.

[FR Doc. 00-12168  Filed 5-12-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### Mills *vs.*Young and Halstead.

An action will not lie in favor of a *sheriff*on a promissory note obtained by Mm under the threat of selling the property of a defendant in an execution, where at the time of such threat the sheriff was the owner of the judgment on which the execution issued, but keeps the fact concealed from the defendant.

A sheriff cannot execut *e final process*in Ms own favor; and whether since the revised statutes he can serve a *capias ad respondendum*in his own favor, although no bail be required, *quere.*

This was an action of *assumpsit,*tried at the Washington circuit in November, 1838, before the Hon. John Willard, one of the circuit judges.

The plaintiff claimed to recover on a promissory note, dated February 1, 1837, for $306,71, made by the defendant *Young,*and endorsed by the defendant *Halstead,*payable at the Whitehall Bank ninety days after date. The plaintiff was a deputy of the sheriff of Essex, and had in his hands, an execution in favor of one *Moore,*against the defendant Young, which he had neo-lected to levy, whereby Moore insisted he had made himself liable for the debt. The plaintiff *on the 30th January, 1837, [ *315 ] gave his own note to Moore for the amount, and took an assignment of the judgment. On the first of February following he called on Young, and without telling him of the assignment, or that he had any inter? *315est in the judgment, threatened to levy the execution and sell his property if it was not settled; whereupon the note in question was made and endorsed fór the amount of the debt, Young paid the sheriff’s fees on the Execution, and the plaintiff made an endorsement that payment had been received in full, which he signed as deputy sheriff. The defendants moved for a nonsuit. The judge decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover. A verdict was found for the plaintiff, which the defendants now move to set aside.

*A. C.*Sand, for defendants.

*O.*Allen, for plaintiff.

Bronson, J.

*By the Court,*Although it was formerly held that a deputy sheriff might serve a *capias ad respondendum*in his own favor where no bail was required, *Bennett*v. *Fuller,*4 *Johns. R.*486, it is questionable whether he can do so now. 2 *R. S.*441, § 84. But whatever may be the rule in relation to *mesne*process, it is clear that the sheriff cannot execute *final*process in his own favor. I find no authority for such a practice, and to allow it would be opening a wide door to abuse and oppression.

The note was'obtained by fraud and unauthorized coercion. The plaintiff concealed the fact that he came as the party in interest, and asserted the right, which he did not possess, of acting as a public officer. He threatened to levy the execution and sell property if the debt was not settled, and took his fees on the execution. The payment of a note obtained by such means ought not to be enforced. The plaintiff must resort to such remedy as he may have on the judgment which has been assigned to him.

New trial granted;
Date: June 24, 2011

Subject: Telephone Call with Bath Iron Works Shipyard on the Potential Impact of 

Adopting Coating Limits based on California Air Resources Board Regulations 

Shipbuilding and Ship Repair (Surface Coating) RTR

RTI Project No. 0212783.013

From: Dave Reeves, RTI International

To: Tina Ndoh

OAQPS/SPPD/NRG (D243-02)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

I. Contact

Ms. Stephanie Carver

Environmental Engineer – Bath Iron Works Shipyard

Bath, ME (207) 442 – 1274

II. Summary of Information

I called Bath Iron Works (BIW) to get input on the possibility of using the California Air 

Resources Board (CARB) coating limits for ship coatings across the country. Ms. Carver 

provided the following comments. She stated that BIW would have significant problems meeting 

some of the coating limits due to the winter weather conditions in Maine compared to California. 

Cold-climate painting requires more thinning and sometimes special equipment to keep the paint 

from freezing in the pots and transfer lines. 

BIW does outside ship painting year round and they typically experience cold weather 

conditions (below 40° F) 4 or 5 months a year (November through March or April). Ms Carver 

also commented that they use a lot of preconstruction primers and general use paints. They also 

work with coating suppliers to evaluate new products that would dry quicker and have also looked 

at higher solids and ultra-high solid formulations.
Exhibit 99.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of  AEI  Income  &
Growth  Fund 23 LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB  for  the
period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Robert  P.  Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management  XXI,
Inc.,  the Managing Member of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906  of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
          Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained in the  Report  fairly
          presents,  in all material respects, the financial
          condition  and  results  of  operations   of   the
          Company.


                              /s/ Robert P Johnson
                                  Robert P. Johnson
                                  President of
                                  AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.,
                                  the Managing Member
                                  August 6, 2002