alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31998R0955 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998R0955

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 955/98 of 29 April 1998 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature **

*
Official Journal L 133 , 07/05/1998 P. 0012 - 0013 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 955/98 of 29 April 1998 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1) on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2509/97 (2), and in particular Article 9,

Whereas in order to ensure uniform application of the Combined Nomenclature annexed to the said Regulation, it is necessary to adopt measures concerning the classification of the goods referred to in the Annex to this Regulation;

Whereas Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 has set down the general rules for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature and those rules also apply to any other nomenclature which is wholly or partly based on it or which adds any additional subdivision to it and which is established by specific Community provisions, with a view to the application of tariff and other measures relating to trade in goods;

Whereas, pursuant to the said general rules, the goods described in column 1 of the table annexed to the present Regulation must be classified within the appropriate CN codes indicated in column 2, by virtue of the reasons set out in column 3;

Whereas it is accepted that binding tariff information issued by the customs authorities of Member States in respect of the classification of goods in the Combined Nomenclature and which do not conform to the rights established by this Regulation, can continue to be invoked, under the provisions in Article 12(6) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (3), for a period of three months by the holder;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Tariff and Statistical Nomenclature Section of the Customs Code Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The goods described in column 1 of the annexed table are now classified within the Combined Nomenclature within the appropriate CN codes indicated in column 2 of the said table.

Article 2

Binding tariff information issued by the customs authorities of Member States which do not conform to the rights established by this Regulation can continue to be invoked under the provisions of Article 12(6) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 for a period of three months.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 21st day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 April 1998.

For the Commission

Mario MONTI

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 256, 7. 9. 1987, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 345, 16. 12. 1997, p. 44.

(3) OJ L 302, 19. 10. 1992, p. 1.

ANNEX

>TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, James A. Clark, the chief
financial officer of Critical Path, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 31, 2006



/S/    JAMES A.
CLARKJames A. Clark Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to Critical
Path, Inc. and will be retained by Critical Path, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# EUR-Lex - 31999D0520 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999D0520

**99/520/EC: Commission Decision of 9 July 1999 amending Decision 98/589/EC concerning an extension of the maximum period laid down for the application of eartags to certain bovine animals belonging to the Spanish herd (notified under document number C(1999) 2039) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 199 , 30/07/1999 P. 0072 - 0072 *

COMMISSION DECISION

of 9 July 1999

amending Decision 98/589/EC concerning an extension of the maximum period laid down for the application of eartags to certain bovine animals belonging to the Spanish herd

(notified under document number C(1999) 2039)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(1999/520/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97 of 21 April 1997 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and the labeling of beef and beef products(1), and in particular Article 4(2) thereof,

Having regard to the request submitted by Spain,

(1) whereas by Commission Decision 589/98/EC(2) the Kingdom of Spain has been granted an extension up to six months of the maximum period laid down for the application of the eartags to certain bovine animals due to practical difficulties;

(2) whereas following a request submitted by the Spanish authorities, the Annex to this Decision should be amended as to include the whole of the province of Palencia instead of the three "comarcas" mentioned originally in the Annex to Commission Decision 589/98/EC;

(3) whereas this amendment is justified as animals born in this province fulfill the conditions set by that Decision;

(4) whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In the Annex to the Commission Decision 589/98/EC, at the column "comarca", as regards to the "Provincia Palencia", the references "El Cerrato, Campos and Saldana-Valdavia" shall be replaced by the reference "Toda la Provincia".

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 July 1999.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 117, 7.5.1997, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 283, 21.10.1998, p. 19.
#### Lila Bertles et al., Respondents, v Angelo J. Rubino et al., Defendants, and Sidney D. Harvey, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 546]

—In an action, *inter*alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Sidney D. Harvey appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), entered December 7, 1998, as, upon reargument of his prior cross motion for summary judgment which was granted by an order of the same court, entered July 27, 1998, denied the cross motion.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which, upon reargument, denied the appellant’s cross motion and substituting therefor a provision adhering to so much of the prior order as granted the appellant’s cross motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the appellant, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendant Sidney D. Harvey, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The general allegations of negligence set forth by the plaintiffs’ expert were conclusory and unsupported by evidence, and thus insufficient to defeat the appellant’s cross motion in which he made out a prima facie case for summary judgment *(see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324; *Rosado v Lutheran Med. Ctr.,*202 AD2d 412; *Guida v Hsu,*187 AD2d 485). Further, the plaintiffs failed to establish the existence of a doctor/patient relationship so as to impose liability on the appellant (cf*., Heller v Peekskill Community Hosp.,*198 AD2d 265). Thompson, J. P., Joy, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 17, 2019

No. 04-17-00815-CR

Issac WILLIAMS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR8370B

Honorable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This appeal is set for formal submission and oral argument before this Court on February 

12, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. before a panel consisting of Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice 

Patricia O. Alvarez, and Justice Liza A. Rodriguez. We request that the parties focus their oral 

argument on Issues 9, 13, and 17-23. 

Argument is limited to twenty (20) minutes to each side and ten (10) minutes rebuttal for 

the appellant. If you do not wish to present argument, you must notify this Court in writing 

within seven (7) days of receiving this order.

The Court provides a guest WiFi network for the parties arguing before the Court. The 

password to access the network is available at the Clerk’s Office on the day of argument.

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DOMINIQUE S. ALLEN

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 1653

[ October 14, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County ; Dan L. Vaughn

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312012CF001548A

.

Dominique S. Allen, Daytona Beach, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C ONNER

, C.J., M AY

, and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ. concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1615

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1615 appear at 73 FR 39866, July 11, 2008.

#### § 1615.111 Notice.

The Commission shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the Commission, and make such information available to them in such manner as the Chair of the Commission finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and this regulation.

[54 FR 22749, May 26, 1989, as amended at 73 FR 39866, July 11, 2008]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 97 (Thursday, May 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12448]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Experimental & Integrative Activities; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Experimental & Integrative 
Activities (1193).
    Date and Time: June 29, 2000, 8 a.m.-5:30 p.m.
    Place: Room 1235 and 530, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Anthony Maddox, CISE Educational Innovation, 
Experimental and Integrative Activities, Room 1160, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: 
(703) 306-1981.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the National Science Foundation 
for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate CISE Educational Innovation 
proposals submitted in response to the program announcement (NSF) 
00-33).
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 522b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 12, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-12448 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### Anon.

“Where a sheriff or other officer is in default for not returning an *attachment,*the court in *term, time*will allow an attachment against such officer and appoint an *elizor*to serve the same; and under peculiar circumstances will appoint such elizor residing in a county other than that in which the defendant in the process resides.

Where a new sheriff has come into office, the process will be directed to him, and an elizor will not be appointed.

A motion was made for a non-bailable attachment against a coroner of *102
      *Niagara*county, for not returning an attachment against .the sheriff of that county, and it was also moved that an elizor residing in the county of Albany, be appointed to execute the process, in consequence of the difficulty of having process of this kind served in Niagara,

*By the Court.*

The statute, 2*R. 8.*537, § 17, authorizes the issuing of an attachment against a sheriff or other officer who makes default in returning, by the return day, an attachment delivered to him to be served, “ upon the same being allowed by a judge of the court, or by some officer authorized to perform the duties of a judge, upon proof of such default.” Notwithstanding the terms of the statute, the application maybe made to the court in *term*time, and it is the most convenient course, as an *elizor*can be appointed only by the court.' It is not necessary that the *elizor*should be a resident of the same county with the officer in default; and under the circumstance attending the collection of debts for some time past in the county of *Niagara,*we will appoint an *elizor*residing in the county of *Albany,*to serve this process. Had a new sheriff come into office since the default, we would have ordered the attachment to be directed to him.

Ordered accordingly.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.1



                          IASIS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of IASIS Healthcare
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                         /s/ David R. White
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         David R. White
                                         Chairman of the Board,
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         IASIS Healthcare Corporation
                                         August 29, 2003


                                         /s/ W. Carl Whitmer
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         W. Carl Whitmer
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         IASIS Healthcare Corporation
                                         August 29, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to IASIS Healthcare Corporation and will be retained by IASIS
Healthcare Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Devany, Dennis (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Brian, 

Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Tuesday, October 26, 2010 10:20 AM 

'iwdairplane@flyfromironwood.com'; 'Manistee Airport' 

~t)T" osr - ~'\,,\Ct .. \U1v 

!)c1T""... osr.. I '\1\(' , 11-rf 

Swanson, Brian (OST); 'Rob McKinney'; Shane@multiaero.com; Darnea@multiaero.com; 

'Mickey Bowman'; 'jg727@aol.com'; dlucas@businessaircraftgroup.com; 

'Daniel.Shurz@flyfrontier.com' 

RE: IWD EAS 

I ronwood-Manisteell. pdf; Ironwood & Manistee.docx; Ironwood & Manistee.pdf; IronwoodManistee. pdf; Ironwood & Manistee.docx 

Plz fill in if I forgot any proposals. 

Duane/Barry, 

In the interest of time, let this e-mail serve as DOT's formal request for community comments. Please submit your 

comments by November 18. If you will need more time, please let us know a couple days before the 18th• 

Dennis 

From: iwdairplane@f1yfromironwood.com [mailto: iWdairplane@flyfromironwood.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 10:03 AM 

To: Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Cc: Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Subject: IWD EAS 

Dennis, 

J> 

I was wondering how the bids came in? I know you will be getting them posted later, but I am curious. It is a nice thing to 

see more than one bid coming in these days. 

Thanks, 

Duane DuRay 

Tracking: 

1
§ 17.4 What are the Secretary's general responsibilities under the Order? ( a ) The Secretary provides opportunities for consultation by elected officials of those state and local governments that would provide the non-Federal funds for, or that would be directly affected by, proposed Federal financial assistance from, or direct Federal development by, the Department.
( b ) If a state adopts a process under the Order to review and coordinate proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development, the Secretary, to the extent permitted by law: ( 1 ) Uses the state process to determine official views of state and local elected officials;
( 2 ) Communicates with state and local elected officials as early in a program planning cycle as is reasonably feasible to explain specific plans and actions;
( 3 ) Makes efforts to accommodate state and local elected officials' concerns with proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development that are communicated through the state process;
( 4 ) Allows the states to simplify and consolidate existing federally required state plan submissions;
( 5 ) Where state planning and budgeting systems are sufficient and where permitted by law, encourages the substitution of state plans for federally required state plans;
( 6 ) Seeks the coordination of views of affected state and local elected officials in one state with those of another state when proposed Federal financial assistance or direct Federal development has an impact on interstate metropolitan urban centers or other interstate areas; and
( 7 ) Supports state and local governments by discouraging the reauthorization or creation of any planning organization which is federally-funded, which has a limited purpose, and which is not adequately representative of, or accountable to, state or local elected officials.
#### § 102.41 Objection to conduct of hearing; how made; objections not waived by further participation.

Any objection with respect to the conduct of the hearing, including any objection to the introduction of evidence, may be stated orally or in writing, accompanied by a short statement of the grounds of such objection, and included in the record. No such objection will be deemed waived by further participation in the hearing.
§ 1902.43 Affirmative 18(e) decision. ( a ) In publishing his affirmative 18(e) decision in the Federal Register the Assistant Secretary's notice shall include, but shall not be limited to the following: ( 1 ) Those issues under the plan over which the Assistant Secretary is withdrawing his standards and enforcement authority;
( 2 ) A statement that the Assistant Secretary retains his authority under section 11(c) of the Act with regard to complaints alleging discrimination against employees because of the exercise of any right afforded to the employee by the Act;
( 3 ) An amendment to the appropriate section of part 1952 of this chapter;
( 4 ) A statement that the Assistant Secretary is not precluded from revoking his determination and reinstating his standards and enforcement authority under § 1902.47 *et seq.,* if his continuing evaluations under section 18(f) of the Act show that the State has substantially failed to maintain a program which is at least as effective as operations under the Federal program, or if the State does not submit program change supplements to its plan to the Assistant Secretary as required by 29 CFR part 1953.
[40 FR 54782, Nov. 26, 1975, as amended at 80 FR 49904, Aug. 18, 2015]
#### CRAWFORD v LISTON, et

Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Summit Co

No 1753.

Decided June 2, 1930

Lee J. Myers, Akron, and Harris Anson, for Crawford.

Slabaugh, Seiberling, Huber & Guinther, Akron, for defendant, The Gough Lumber Co.

' Rockwell & Grant, Akron and C. F. Schnee, Akron, Amicus curiae.

Syllabus by PARDEE, J.

Mechanic’s lien claimants upon the same job who perfect their liens upon registered land, do not have priority as among themselves, there being no express provisions in the land registration law different from or in conflict with 8321 GC.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

39–011 2014

113th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 113–147 

NOTIFICATION OF TARGETED AIRSTRIKES IN IRAQ 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

A NOTIFICATION OF AN AUTHORIZATION OF TARGETED 

AIRSTRIKES IN IRAQ 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2014.—Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 

ordered to be printed 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with HDOCE:\Seals\Congress.#13

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with HDOC
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, September 1, 2014. 

Hon. JOHN A. BOEHNER, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: As I reported on August 8 and 17, 2014, U.S. 

Armed Forces have conducted targeted airstrikes in Iraq for the 

limited purposes of stopping the advance on Erbil by the terrorist 

group Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), supporting civilians trapped on Mount Sinjar, and supporting operations by Iraqi 

forces to recapture the Mosul Dam. U.S. Armed Forces have also 

provided humanitarian assistance to the civilians trapped on 

Mount Sinjar. 

On August 28, 2014, I further authorized U.S. Armed Forces to 

conduct targeted airstrikes in support of an operation to deliver humanitarian assistance to civilians in the town of Amirli, Iraq, 

which is surrounded and besieged by ISIL. Pursuant to this authorization, on August 30, 2014, U.S. military forces commenced targeted airstrike operations in the vicinity of Amirli, Iraq. These additional operations will be limited in their scope and duration as 

necessary to address this emerging humanitarian crisis and protect 

the civilians trapped in Amirli. 

I have directed these actions, which are in the national security 

and foreign policy interests of the United States, pursuant to my 

constitutional authority to conduct U.S. foreign relations and as 

Commander in Chief and Chief Executive. These actions are being 

undertaken in coordination with and at the request of the Iraqi 

government. 

I am providing this report as part of my efforts to keep the Congress fully informed, consistent with the War Powers Resolution 

(Public Law 93–148). I appreciate the support of the Congress in 

this action. 

Sincerely, 

BARACK OBAMA. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with HDOC