BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

WASHINGTON, DC 

____________________________________ 

 ) 

In the matter of the application of ) 

 ) 

WINGS AIRWAYS ) DOCKET DOT-OST-2010-0023 

 ) 

For a certificate of public convenience ) 

And necessity under 49 USC 41102 ) 

____________________________________) 

ANSWER IN OPPOSITION OF 

AIR EXCURSIONS, LLC 

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to: 

Mike Loverink 

Air Excursions, LLC 

Suite 115 

1873 Shell Simmons Drive 

Juneau, AK 99801 

(907) 789-5591 

mloverink@yahoo.com

February 16, 2010 
1

BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

WASHINGTON, DC 

____________________________________ 

 ) 

In the matter of the application of ) 

 ) 

WINGS AIRWAYS ) DOCKET DOT-OST-2010-0023 

 ) 

For a certificate of public convenience ) 

And necessity under 49 USC 41102 ) 

____________________________________) 

ANSWER IN OPPOSITION OF 

AIR EXCURSIONS, LLC 

On January 25, 2010, Wings Airways applied for a certificate of public convenience and 

necessity. Throughout the filing, Wings Airways (Airways) stressed that the Application 

was primarily a defensive gesture. The Applicant appears worried that certain 

shareholders of Wings Airways might lose their employment. Two shareholders already 

have, having voluntarily resigned as key managers at Alaska Juneau Aeronautics, Inc. 

d/b/a Wings of Alaska (AJA). AJA had previously been a commonly owned certificated 

air carrier operating wheel plane service Wings Airways operates seasonal tourism 

flights using seaplanes, and the third commonly owned affiliate owns the aircraft. In 

2008 the owners voluntarily sold AJA to a group of Oregon entrepreneurs who desired to 

offer a new scheduled service between Seattle and Portland. This new operation, 

SeaPort, was later expanded to include Essential Air Service in several lower-48 markets. 

In Alaska, AJA increased its service by providing Essential Air Service with subsidy in 
2

two new markets, Kake and Excursion Inlet. According to company statements given to 

the media, AJA is profitable has no intent of changing service in any of its markets. 

Perhaps more to the point for the Wings Airways shareholders who also own Wings 

Airlines Services, the leases of five wheeled aircraft by Wings Airlines Services to 

AJA/Seaport were due to expire on March 31. Not having received assurances of 

continued profitable leases on those aircraft, Wings Airline Services decided on a new 

gambit. Appendix L to the Application shows that Wings Airways founder, director and 

significant shareholder Robert Jacobsen offered two Cessna Caravans and three Cessna 

207’s for lease unless AJA could come to agreeable terms. That letter, dated January 22, 

2010, resulted in the filing of the current Application just three days later. As will be 

shown later, the Application is really nothing more than a negotiating gambit. The 

execution date of the three included affidavits (January 6, 2010) shows that Wings 

Airways and Wings Airline Services had prepared the Application in advance against the 

event of a negotiating impasse with AJA. 

To test the possibility that the Application is a red herring, Air Excursions moved to 

reopen carrier selection in the Kake and Excursion Inlet EAS case. Citing Airways claim 

that it would have possession and control of the five aircraft currently used by AJA, we 

requested the Department consider Air Excursions for operation of the routes with 

appropriate subsidy. It must be noted that Department regulations require a 90-day notice 

before cessation or even substantial reduction of service in any market. AJA has not 

provided the required notice in any Alaskan market, and continued service requires the 
3

exclusive use of the five aircraft proposed for service by Airways. Appendix A is the 

response by AJA. In that response AJA not only reiterates its intent to continue service 

to Kake and Excursion, but to all southeastern Alaska markets. To provide these 

services, AJA asserts that it will have continuing use of the two Caravan and three Cessna 

207 aircraft also claimed by Airways. There are now two filings on the record claiming 

exclusive use of the same five aircraft. 

Airways also claims to lease a 24,000 square foot hangar and cargo facility (cite). Its 

Application states that ownership of the hangar is in dispute and part of a bankruptcy 

filing in Oregon. In fact, none of the Juneau parties (Airways, Wings Airline Services 

and their respective common owners) have any ownership claim or control of the Juneau 

hangar. Mr. Jacobsen, the previous owner of the hangar, has traded his financial interest 

in the Juneau hangar for equity in another building in Portland, OR. Appendix B clearly 

shows that the Juneau hangar at 8421 Livingston Way is solely owned by Fountain 

Village Development. Under bankruptcy law, Airways continuation as a tenant depends 

entirely on the good will of AJA. Fountain Village Development is not affiliated with 

AJA, but is owned by a primary investor in AJA, John Beardsley. 

With regard to the only physical assets proposed for use by Airways we now have three 

certified statements (AJA, Airways and Fountain Village Development) that are in 

conflict. Air Excursions does not claim any complete knowledge of the situation, but 

given the devolving relationships among the parties the Department must determine with 
4

certainty who owns and controls the various assets that are essential to Airways proposed 

operation. 

THE APPLICATION IS DEFICIENT AND INCOMPLETE

The requirements of 14 CFR 204 require certain specific data be provided, and Airways 

missed at least two vital requirements. 14 CFR 204.3(n)(2) requires provision of the 

terms of any leases. Other than stating that it will finance the aircraft and hangar with 

internal funds, Airways provides no details about the disputed assets. In order to show 

that it is capable of providing the service it promises. Airways must be required to 

provide executed leases for all five aircraft and the hangar in its application. 

Given that Airways does not currently operate wheel planes, has no ticket counters, 

airport ramp space or employees at any of the airports it proposes to serve, there should 

be some specification of its pre-operating activities and expenses. Contrary to the 

requirements of 14 CFR 204.3(t)(2), Airways does not provide an itemization of 

anticipated pre-operating expense, nor does it provide a statement of the basis of 

projected costs. As shown below, Airways provides very few assumptions and no 

specific sourcing, and those that are provided are unrealistic. 

The Application is deficient in that it fails to provide basic information on the proposed 

operation which can be used to validate and verify operating assumptions. For example, 

there is no proposed flight schedule in any of the markets. While the total block time 
5

proposed is somewhat less than that of AJA, the yields and total load factors are much 

higher. 

Airways significantly overestimates the revenue to be derived from the traffic it predicts 

it will carry. For example, Airways assumes passenger yields that are higher or just 

lower than the pre-tax full adult non-reservation fares in the markets and much higher 

than the actual yields experienced by Air Excursions in the same markets. 

 Market Airways Fare Pre-Tax Full Fare Air X Net 

 Juneau-Hoonah $ 64.00 $ 69.77 $ 60.00 

 Juneau-Haines $ 101.00 $ 97.67 $ 84.00 

 Juneau-Skagway $ 110.00 $ 111.63 $ 96.00 

Based on the passenger projections, Airways overestimates its passenger revenue in the 

Hoonah market by $41,400 (10,350 passengers @ $4.00), the Haines market by $157,250 

(9,250 passengers @ $17.00) and the Skagway market by $152,6000 (10,900 passengers 

@ $14.00). Even assuming the projected passenger numbers, Airways has overestimated 

its passenger revenue by $ 351,250. 

Airways proposes freight rates that are higher than the existing $0.40/lb. one-pound rate 

in all of the markets. Based on the 671,000 freight pounds projected, Airways 

overestimates its freight revenue by $105,250 (671,000 @ $0.40/lb vs. $373,650 

projected). Even if we assume the volume levels of passenger and freight traffic in these 

competitive markets, Airways has overestimated the revenue that will be earned by 

$456,500. 
6

The traffic levels are equally subject to question. Airways uses AJA historic traffic from 

calendar year 2008, but assumes that it will carry virtually all of the passengers and 

freight in all three markets. Appendix C shows that Airways projects it will carry 

between 97.24% and 100% of total scheduled service market passengers, and between 

97.11% and 99.46% of total scheduled service market passengers. Strangely, Airways 

only assumes between 49.38% and 82.97% of mail traffic. This might indicate that 

Airways assumes competition in the three markets, but in any case if Airways had 

assumed virtually all of the mail traffic in the markets its on-board load factors would 

exceed 100% in the peak season. In 2008 AJA/Wings of Alaska provided the only 

scheduled services in these markets, and transported 100% of the traffic. Today both 

AJA and Air Excursions provide scheduled service and split the traffic. Unless AJA 

discontinues its service, Airways would become the third scheduled carrier in the market. 

Airways further tunes its projections by assuming less capacity than AJA provided in 

2008 and resultingly higher total load factors. Appendix D shows the 2008 experienced 

segment load factors (source: AJA T-100 segment reports) and the projected load factors 

Airways assumes. While the passenger load factors hover near experienced levels, the 

projected total load factors are consistently much higher than experience, and up to 215% 

of the actual loads for AJA (3rd calendar quarter, Juneau-Skagway market). In any case it 

is adsurd to assume that Airways will carry nearly 100% of the passenger and freight 

traffic in the markets as the second carrier if not the third carrier competing. Combining 

the overstated load factors with the overstated passenger and freight yields shows that the 
7

profits projected by Airways are entirely illusory. The Department must require 

clarification and sourcing for all of the projections made by Airways. 

WHO HAS THE AIRCRAFT?

On page 7 of its Application, Airways makes the situation very clear. It says, “In the 

event Wings of Alaska does not have the necessary aircraft to provide the required 

service, or if Wings of Alaska enough qualified employees to perform the required 

operations, Wings Airways would be able to provide the service with sufficient aircraft 

and employees. Obviously the converse is true. If AJA/Wings of Alaska has use of the 

five aircraft proposed for service by Airways, Airways will not have the necessary 

aircraft and employees to perform the service if proposes. All of the spreadsheet magic 

of its financial forecasts will be for naught if it does not have the necessary aircraft. 

Without the five aircraft, Airways cannot be found able to perform the service. The 

singular question on which certification of Airways hinges is who has the aircraft? 

SUMMARY 

Weeks before Wings Airline Services reached an apparent impasse with AJA on the 

continued lease of two Caravans and three C-207’s, Airways was persuaded to develop 

an alternative use for the aircraft. Within days of offering the aircraft to Airways the 

Application was filed. Within short order an extended lease for the aircraft with AJA was 

executed as evidenced by Appendix A. The Department’s certification process was used 
8

as a negotiating ploy by Wings Airline Services and its common owners of Wings 

Airways. While Airways admitted that the service was subject to the availability of 

aircraft, the application was really a ruse. Airways also overlooks entirely the fact that 

Air Excursions is now providing scheduled service and has as many aircraft available to 

service on these routes as does AJA today. Even if AJA ceases to operate, Air 

Excursions have sufficient capacity. There is no service emergency or need for prompt 

action. The Airways application should be based on its merits, or which there are not 

enough for the necessary finding. 

WHEREFORE, Air Excursions, LLC asks that the Application of Wings Airways be 

dismissed for lack of foundation and fitness. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Air Excursions, LLC 

_________________________ 

By Mike Loverink, owner 

February 16, 2010 
9

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this day caused a copy of the Answer in Opposition of Air 

Excursions, LLC to be mailed to all persons listed on the certificate of service appended 

to the Application of Wings Airways filed January 25, 2010. 

____________________ 

Mike Loverink 

February 16, 2010 
10

Appendix A 

Page 1 of 2 

ALASKA JUNEAU AERONAUTICS 

Answer to Motion to reopen Selection of Carriers for Dockets 2002- 

12014 and 2008-0217 

Alaska Juneau Aeronautics, Inc. (“AJA”) objects to Air Excursions, L.L.C.’s (“AE”) 

Motion to Reopen the Selection of Carriers dated February 2, 2010 for the following 

reasons. 

AE’s allegation that AJA does have the necessary Caravan’s to fulfill its contractual 

obligations to the Department to provide air service to Kake and Excursion Inlet AK is false. 

AJA currently leases 2 Caravans and 3 Cessna 207s and will continue to have the needed 

aircraft to meet its contractual obligations to the DOT. 

AE’s allegation that AJA has over-charged the Department by substituting aircraft is false. 

AJA bills the Department $307.54 for departures in a C208 and $170.86 for departures in a 

C207. This represents a 45% savings to the department which is more than the cost 

difference Mr. Myers claims of 40%. The reduction in subsidy is by departure, so it 

automatically accounts for the difference in indirect expense. AJA could have run the more 

expensive aircraft on the route and needlessly billed the department for empty seats. 

However, this seems fiscally irresponsible. 

AE’s allegations that AJA has not flown all required flights to Kake and Excursion Inlet is 

false. AJA has completed every flight to these communities that were safe to do so. AJA has 

done so in the most efficient aircraft possible. In no case did we turn passenger traffic away 

to fly a smaller aircraft. 

Contrary to AE’s allegations, AJA has actually gone beyond its contractual obligations as 

follows: 

1. Even though only contractually obligated to provide two round trips per day, AJA 

provided three round trips last summer at our own risk. Additionally, the statistics 

provided end last November 2009. In December 2009 AJA flew every trip to Kake in a 

C208. 

2. In about two months AJA will have its entire inventory distributed on all on-line travel 

agencies (Expedia, Travelocity, etc.) This level visibility in the global distribution system 

is unprecedented for these rural communities. AJA has taken this step at its own 

expense and outside of the costs contemplated in its original bid. 

8421 Livingston Way • Juneau, AK 99801 • 907-789-0790 
11

Appendix A 

Page 2 of 2

ALASKA JUNEAU AERONAUTICS 

We submit that AJA has faithfully, and diligently upheld its obligations to the 

Department and the communities, that Air Excursion's false accusations should be 

disregarded, and that their Motion should be denied. 

Sincerely, 

Rob McKinney 

President 

Alaska Juneau Aeronautics, Inc. 

8421 Livingston Way • Juneau, AK 99801 • 907-789-0790 
12

Appendix B 

Page 1 of 1 

In re Fountain Village Development, a general partnership 

Attachment to Voluntary Petition 

Location of Principal Assets of Debtor 

Property Address City, State, Zip County 

Fountain Village Block 

2nd and Ankeny 15-27 SW 2nd Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah 

2nd and Burnside 9-13 SW 2nd Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah 

3rd and Ankeny 16 SW 3rd Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah 

New Market Theater Block 

Fountain Village Bldg 75-83 SW 1st Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah 

New Market Theater Bldg 120 SW Ankeny St Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah 

Patrick and Poppleton Buildings 

Patrick and Poppleton 816-818 SW 1st Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah 

Patrick and Poppleton 824-828 SW 1st Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah 

Loyalty and Hamilton Buildings 

Loyalty Building 317 SW Alder St Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah 

Hamilton Building 523-529 SW 3rd Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah 

11 NW 5th 11 NW 5th Ave Portland, OR 97209 Multnomah 

5 NW 5th 5 NW 5th Ave Portland, OR 97209 Multnomah 

522 NW Thompson 522 N Thompson St Portland, OR 97227 Multnomah 

61st Street 13642 SW 61st Ave Portland, OR 97219-8133 Clackamas 

Blagen 30-34 NW 1st Ave Portland, OR 97209 Multnomah 

Gearhart 1768 Ocean Dr Gearhart, OR 97138 Clatsop 

Jazz de Opus 27-33 NW 2nd Ave Portland, OR 97209 Multnomah 

Oregon Pioneer Building 409 SW 3rd Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah 

Postal Building 502-516 SW 3rd Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah 

Yeon Land / Building 520-530 SW 5th Ave Portland, OR 97204 Multnomah 

Juneau, Alaska Hangar 8421 Livingston Way Juneau, AK 99801 Juneau

Source; Bankruptcy filing of Fountain Village Development, Portland, OR 
13
YR MO ORI ORI CITY DEST DEST CITY CARR CLASS PAX FRT 

2008 4 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 380 112008 4 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 359 1732008 5 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 535 192008 5 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 524 1532008 6 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 531 472008 6 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 543 141 APR-JUN TOTALS 2872 545

AIRWAYS PROJECTION 2,850 54,0

AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE 99.23% 98.9

2008 7 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 633 622008 7 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 625 1572008 8 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 719 382008 8 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 705 1692008 9 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 629 292008 9 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 533 152 JUL-SEP TOTALS 3844 609

AIRWAYS PROJECTION 3,800 60,0

AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE 98.86% 98.4

2008 10 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 585 222008 10 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 503 1382008 11 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 357 182008 11 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 322 882008 12 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 291 122008 12 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 278 117 OCT-DEC TOTALS 2336 398

AIRWAYS PROJECTION 2,300 39,0

AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE 98.46% 97.9

2008 1 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 196 92008 1 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 184 962008 2 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 196 192008 2 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 201 882008 3 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 328 132008 3 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 301 81 JAN-MAR TOTALS 1406 308

AIRWAYS PROJECTION 1,400 30,0

AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE 99.57% 97.3
1

YR MO ORI ORI CITY DEST DEST CITY CARR CLASS PAX FRT 2008 4 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 369 272008 4 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 413 1602008 5 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 454 202008 5 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 502 1362008 6 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 506 272008 6 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 611 169 APR-JUN TOTALS 2855 542

AIRWAYS PROJECTION 2,850 54,0

AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE 99.82% 99.4

2008 7 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 584 452008 7 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 756 2182008 8 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 687 552008 8 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 748 1762008 9 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 475 542008 9 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 480 206 JUL-SEP TOTALS 3730 756

AIRWAYS PROJECTION 3,700 75,0

AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE 99.20% 99.1

2008 10 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 487 462008 10 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 476 1872008 11 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 226 232008 11 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 224 1062008 12 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 159 262008 12 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 199 113 OCT-DEC TOTALS 1771 503

AIRWAYS PROJECTION 1,750 50,0

AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE 98.81% 99.3

2008 1 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 109 132008 1 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 150 942008 2 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 112 92008 2 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 148 882008 3 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 211 122008 3 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 247 126 JAN-MAR TOTALS 977 344

AIRWAYS PROJECTION 950 34,0AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE 97.24% 98.6
2

YR MO ORI ORI CITY DEST DEST CITY CARR CLASS PAX FRT 2008 4 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 494 2462008 4 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 323 312008 5 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 738 3462008 5 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 591 342008 6 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 916 3412008 6 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 855 46 APR-JUN TOTALS 3917 1046

AIRWAYS PROJECTION 3,900 104,0

AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE 99.57% 99.3

2008 7 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 991 3542008 7 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 1005 562008 8 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 1068 3172008 8 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 1133 522008 9 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 488 1842008 9 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 582 63 JUL-SEP TOTALS 5267 1029

AIRWAYS PROJECTION 5,250 102,0

AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE 99.68% 99.0

2008 10 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 232 1442008 10 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 237 262008 11 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 155 862008 11 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 144 112008 12 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 111 972008 12 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 121 11

OCT-DEC TOTALS 1000 377AIRWAYS PROJECTION 1,000 37,0

AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE 100.00% 97.9

2008 1 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 80 792008 1 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 58 132008 2 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 99 832008 2 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 116 112008 3 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 241 1292008 3 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 202 12 JAN-MAR TOTALS 796 329

AIRWAYS PROJECTION 750 32,0AIRWAYS MARKET SHARE 94.22% 97.1
Y M ORI ORI CITY DEST

DEST CITY CAR CLS A/C PAYLOAD SEATS PAX FRT MA

2009 4 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 192,340 590 311 1810 272009 4 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 918 4 0 0 2009 4 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 66,000 198 90 348 52009 4 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 185,820 570 267 11197 1022009 4 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 918 4 3 8 2009 4 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 66,000 198 114 1984 342009 5 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 311,330 955 501 3758 532009 5 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 105,000 315 126 1567 212009 5 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 301,550 925 483 12409 1482009 5 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 102,000 306 187 3031 132009 6 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 295,030 905 540 4734 372009 6 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 117,000 351 153 1503 222009 6 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 293,400 900 492 14263 1072009 6 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 111,000 333 172 2985 23 TOTAL 2,148,306 6554 3439 59597 598 AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS 2009 7 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 285,250 875 539 5853 352009 7 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 156,000 468 269 2797 212009 7 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 G 0 35 1,630 5 0 0 2009 7 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 281,990 865 511 14939 1072009 7 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 150,000 450 326 6568 412009 8 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 317,850 975 617 4197 472009 8 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 156,000 468 306 3527 202009 8 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 299,920 920 516 10802 942009 8 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 153,000 459 238 4944 532009 9 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 198,860 610 382 2422 362009 9 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 171,000 513 312 1843 302009 9 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 190,710 585 326 7497 812009 9 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 168,000 504 249 5687 43 TOTAL 2,530,210 7697 4591 71076 614 AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS 
Y M ORI ORI CITY DEST 

DEST CITY CAR CLS A/C PAYLOAD SEATS PAX FRT MAIL 

2009 10 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 161,370 495 290 1625 13682009 10 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 177,000 531 316 1208 20172009 10 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 180,000 540 318 7364 67572009 10 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 163,000 500 273 6956 67682009 11 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 123,880 380 206 1072 14622009 11 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 90,000 270 152 3992 8252009 11 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 90,000 270 139 4043 37312009 11 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 135,290 415 197 7968 86292008 12 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 107,580 330 167 679 19772008 12 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 918 4 0 0 02008 12 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 99,000 297 123 500 31122008 12 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 99,430 305 137 5723 72392008 12 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 99,000 297 139 5998 67922008 12 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 918 4 1 46 633 TOTAL 1,527,386 4638 2458 47174 51310  AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS 2009 1 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 65,200 200 83 809 8942009 1 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 17,442 76 34 138 6102009 1 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 36,000 108 44 172 5742009 1 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 63,570 195 92 4333 29422009 1 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 39,000 117 52 3738 47062009 1 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 20,196 88 34 2408 22372009 2 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 107,580 330 151 782 8782009 2 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 102,000 306 185 739 11722009 2 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 918 4 2 1 02009 2 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 109,210 335 179 4772 41072009 2 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 99,000 297 167 4371 58622009 3 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 123,880 380 193 1609 13322009 3 HNH HOONAH JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 90,000 270 151 416 7112009 3 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 0 35 123,880 380 163 6423 57482009 3 JNU JUNEAU HNH HOONAH K5 F 4 16 87,000 261 101 3841 3967 TOTAL 1,084,876 3347 1631 34552 35740 

AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS 
Y M ORI ORI CITY DEST 

DEST CITY CAR CLS A/C PAYLOAD SEATS PAX FRT MAIL 

2009 4 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 57,050 175 98 794 8562009 4 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 237,000 711 377 3307 46072009 4 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 68,460 210 143 4120 48482009 4 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 225,000 675 442 17921 257332009 5 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 125,510 385 203 1493 10572009 5 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 333,000 999 528 3179 52992009 5 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 125,510 385 220 4979 68892009 5 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 336,000 1008 585 13548 222072009 6 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 156,480 480 254 2720 28062009 6 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 273,000 819 430 2120 49852009 6 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 151,590 465 297 11251 66342009 6 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 261,000 783 427 12233 24439 TOTAL 2,349,600 7095 4004 77665 110360 

AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS 

2009 7 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 166,260 510 279 2739 19912009 7 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 240,000 720 397 3724 42782009 7 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 169,520 520 315 11287 72702009 7 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 306,000 918 583 15217 302742009 8 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 110,840 340 185 2483 27012009 8 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 318,000 954 540 4679 76752009 8 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 104,320 320 143 8655 55642009 8 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 294,000 882 515 15293 239142009 9 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 83,130 255 135 821 27102009 9 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 288,000 864 511 5098 102062009 9 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 86,390 265 128 4928 17542009 9 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 288,000 864 500 13399 33872 TOTAL 2,454,460 7412 4231 88323 132209 

AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS 
Y M ORI ORI CITY DEST 

DEST CITY CAR CLS A/C PAYLOAD SEATS PAX FRT MAIL 

2009 10 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 61,940 190 118 717 9552009 10 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 285,000 855 635 5914 86072009 10 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 48,900 150 88 2353 22272009 10 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 285,000 855 562 21332 346212009 11 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 55,420 170 71 959 7882009 11 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 129,000 387 176 2457 58392009 11 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 57,050 175 108 3993 28732009 11 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 138,000 414 208 18031 249442008 12 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 52,160 160 48 694 29402008 12 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 126,000 378 135 2227 96892008 12 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 22,820 70 20 2400 32072008 12 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 132,000 396 189 11290 24893 TOTAL 1,393,290 4200 2358 72367 121583 

AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS 

2009 1 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 30,970 95 28 259 10502009 1 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 81,000 243 102 1351 48702009 1 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 1,836 8 3 70 1242009 1 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 24,450 75 26 1036 21832009 1 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 1,836 8 4 645 02009 1 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 85,346 252 105 6654 170772009 2 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 47,270 145 57 438 11262009 2 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 132,000 396 203 1995 66422009 2 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 32,600 100 45 2884 49672009 2 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 129,000 387 187 13096 189242009 3 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 48,900 150 62 230 21942009 3 HNS HAINES JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 153,000 459 217 1656 45442009 3 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 0 35 35,860 110 53 2873 32952009 3 JNU JUNEAU HNS HAINES K5 F 4 16 153,000 459 256 11834 18572 TOTAL 957,068 2887 1348 45021 85568 

AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS 
Y M ORI ORI CITY DEST 

DEST CITY CAR CLS A/C PAYLOAD SEATS PAX FRT MAIL 

2009 4 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 52,160 160 101 2901 4422009 4 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 189,000 567 339 11646 29742009 4 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 58,680 180 69 228 992009 4 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 156,000 468 236 1958 3042009 5 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 70,090 215 95 3881 3382009 5 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 393,000 1179 727 30852 41462009 5 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 60,310 185 92 929 342009 5 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 378,000 1134 615 2109 7022009 6 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 88,020 270 156 4983 2412009 6 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 408,000 1224 708 28906 47062009 6 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 83,130 255 117 984 1782009 6 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 369,000 1107 644 4886 1450 TOTAL 2,305,390 6944 3899 94263 15618

AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS 

2009 7 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 128,770 395 234 3792 1912009 7 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 381,000 1143 781 23422 34612009 7 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 128,770 395 221 410 2842009 7 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 414,000 1242 852 4276 14972009 8 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 61,940 190 71 3002 4152009 8 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 423,000 1269 719 23282 37562009 8 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 58,680 180 117 654 1352009 8 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 366,000 1098 753 5116 18382009 9 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 68,460 210 84 5063 3362009 9 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 279,000 837 396 14903 11242009 9 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 70,090 215 103 642 4112009 9 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 249,000 747 464 5104 1470 TOTAL 2,628,710 7921 4795 89666 14923

AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS 
Y M ORI ORI CITY DEST 

DEST CITY CAR CLS A/C PAYLOAD SEATS PAX FRT MAIL 

2009 10 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 47,270 145 64 3223 3000

2009 10 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 102,000 306 144 4503 100622009 10 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 32,600 100 53 328 16862009 10 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 108,000 324 177 890 27512009 11 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 27,710 85 53 2212 4904

2009 11 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 36,000 108 29 3274 7534

2009 11 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 22,820 70 37 356 11772009 11 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 45,000 135 29 791 11692008 12 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 30,970 95 57 3521 2324

2008 12 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 51,000 153 44 3915 9142

2008 12 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 8,150 25 9 41 10892008 12 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 69,000 207 88 891 5821 TOTAL 580,520 1753 784 23945 50659 

AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS 

2009 1 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 17,970 55 26 388 5722009 1 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 27,000 81 12 3095 39252009 1 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 9,780 30 6 72 10452009 1 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 30,000 90 22 293 11972009 2 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 26,080 80 56 597 1362009 2 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 27,000 81 20 1575 66162009 2 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 6,520 20 12 46 3632009 2 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 18,000 54 17 53 2122009 3 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 0 35 27,710 85 47 1985 9352009 3 JNU JUNEAU SGY SKAGWAY K5 F 4 16 57,000 171 99 2889 143142009 3 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 0 35 19,560 60 26 137 9312009 3 SGY SKAGWAY JNU JUNEAU K5 F 4 16 60,000 180 68 847 1772 TOTAL 326,620 987 411 11977 32018 

AIRWAYS PROJECTED LOAD FACTORS