alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 18.32 Computing and extending time. ( a ) *Computing time.* The following rules apply in computing any time period specified in these rules, a judge's order, or in any statute, regulation, or executive order that does not specify a method of computing time. ( 1 ) When the period is stated in days or a longer unit of time: ( i ) Exclude the day of the event that triggers the period;
( ii ) Count every day, including intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays; and
( iii ) Include the last day of the period, but if the last day is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.
( 2 ) *“Last day” defined.* Unless a different time is set by a statute, regulation, executive order, or judge's order, the “last day” ends at 4:30 p.m. local time where the event is to occur.
( 3 ) *“Next day” defined.* The “next day” is determined by continuing to count forward when the period is measured after an event and backward when measured before an event.
( 4 ) *“Legal holiday” defined.* “Legal holiday” means the day set aside by statute for observing New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday, Washington's Birthday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans' Day, Thanksgiving Day, or Christmas Day; and any day on which the district office in which the document is to be filed is closed or otherwise inaccessible.
( b ) *Extending time.* When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the judge may, for good cause, extend the time: ( 1 ) With or without motion or notice if the judge acts, or if a request is made, before the original time or its extension expires; or
( 2 ) On motion made after the time has expired if the party failed to act because of excusable neglect.
( c ) *Additional time after certain kinds of service.* When a party may or must act within a specified time after service and service is made under § 18.30(a)(2)(ii)(C) or (D), 3 days are added after the period would otherwise expire under paragraph (a) of this section.
[80 FR 28785, May 19, 2015, as amended at 80 FR 37539, July 1, 2015]
# EUR-Lex - 32000R2114 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R2114

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2114/2000 of 5 October 2000 amending Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 laying down special detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 as regards export licences and export refunds in the case of milk and milk products **

*
Official Journal L 252 , 06/10/2000 P. 0006 - 0006 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 2114/2000

of 5 October 2000

amending Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 laying down special detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 as regards export licences and export refunds in the case of milk and milk products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1670/2000(2), and in particular Article 26(3) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 174/1999(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1961/2000(4), lays down special detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68(5), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1587/96(6), as regards export licences and export refunds in the case of milk and milk products. In order to ensure the smooth operation of the export refund arrangements and reduce the risk of speculative applications and disturbances of the arrangements for certain milk products, given the market situation, the period of validity of export licences should be reduced and the security laid down in that Regulation should be increased.

(2) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 is amended as follows:

1. Article 6(a) is replaced by the following:

"(a) the end of the fourth month following issue in the case of products falling within CN code 0402 10;"

2. Article 9(b) is replaced by the following:

"(b) 30 % for products covered by CN code 0402 10;"

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 October 2000.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48.

(2) OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 10.

(3) OJ L 20, 27.1.1999, p. 8.

(4) OJ L 234, 16.9.2000, p. 10.

(5) OJ L 148, 28.6.1968, p. 13.

(6) OJ L 206, 16.8.1996, p. 21.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

           Harry Lee Waterfield II and Raymond L. Carr, being the President and ChiefFinancial Officer and Vice President, respectively, of Investors HeritageCapital Corporation,hereby certify as of this ____ day of December, 2009, that the Form 10-K/A for theyear ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Investors Heritage CapitalCorporation.

 

 

|  
 
 
**INVESTORS HERITAGE CAPITAL CORPORATION**
 
 
 
/s/ Harry Lee Waterfield II
 
BY: Harry Lee Waterfield II
DATE:			December ___, 2009
       President
 
 
 
/s/ Raymond L. Carr
 
BY: Raymond L. Carr
DATE:			December ___, 2009
       Chief Financial Officer--Vice President
  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 21

                       KEYSTONE CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES, INC.
                                  AND SUBSIDIARIES


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT




                                Jurisdiction of          Percent of
                                Incorporation         Voting Securities
      Name of Corporation       or Organization            Held (1)   


Sherman Wire of Caldwell, Inc.      Nevada                  100.0%

Fox Valley Steel and Wire Company   Wisconsin               100.0%


DeSoto, Inc.                        Delaware                100.0%
  J.L. Prescott Company             New Jersey              100.0%
  DeSoto Environmental 
   Management, Inc.                 Delaware                100.0%

Engineered Wire Products, Inc.      Ohio                    100.0%

(1)  Held by the Registrant or the indicated subsidiary of the Registrant.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  Exhibit 10.14B

                            SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
             RE-ESTABLISHED RETIREMENT PLAN FOR HOURLY EMPLOYEES OF
                        KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

     WHEREAS, Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (the "Company") maintains the Re-
Established Retirement Plan for Hourly Employees of Kewaunee Scientific
Corporation (the "Plan");

     WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated in its entirety, effective May
1, 1989, and subsequently amended effective May 1, 1989; and

     WHEREAS, the Company now wishes to amend the Plan;

     NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority reserved to the Company under
Section 12.2, the Plan be and hereby is amended, effective January 1, 1997, in
the following particulars:

     1.   Section 7.5 is amended by adding the following as a new subsection
7.5(b) and redesignating the remaining subsections as required:

          "(b)  If the present value of a Pension payable under the Plan, as
determined under paragraph (a), is more than Three Thousand Five Hundred Dollars
($3,500) but not more than Six Thousand Dollars ($6,000), the Participant or
Beneficiary may elect to receive payment of such Pension in a lump sum.  In the
case of a Pension payable to a Participant, such election shall be considered a
selection of an optional form of benefit, and the notice, election and spousal
consent provisions of Section 7.4 shall apply."

     2.   The lump sum equivalency factors of Appendix A are replaced with the
following:

          "For single (lump sum) distributions paid on or after January 1, 1997,
the present value of a Pension shall be determined using the 1983 Group Annuity
Mortality Table (Unisex) or such other mortality table as may be specified under
Section 417(e)(3)(A) of the Code and an interest rate equal to the annual
interest rate on 30-year Treasury securities as announced by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the second month prior to the first
day of the Plan Year in which the distribution occurs."
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4902 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 351 South West Temple 

in Salt Lake City, Utah, as the ‘‘Orrin G. Hatch United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2020 

Mr. LEE (for himself, Mr. ROMNEY, and Mr. MCCONNELL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and 

passed 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 351 

South West Temple in Salt Lake City, Utah, as the 

‘‘Orrin G. Hatch United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ORRIN G. HATCH UNITED STATES COURT4 HOUSE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The United States courthouse 

6 located at 351 South West Temple in Salt Lake City, 

7 Utah, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Orrin G. 

8 Hatch United States Courthouse’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4902 CPS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the United States courthouse referred to in sub4 section (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Orrin 

5 G. Hatch United States Courthouse’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE>
                                                     Exhibit 12


                    LACLEDE GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

           SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
           -------------------------------------------------------------

<CAPTION>
                                        Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
                                  ----------------------------------------
                                  1996     1995     1994     1993     1992
                                  ----     ----     ----     ----     ----
                                            (Thousands of Dollars)
<S>                            <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Income before interest
 charges and the cumulative
 effect of change in
 accounting                    $50,771  $39,428  $38,611  $41,380  $33,888
 
Add: Taxes based on
       utility income           18,603    9,878   12,517   14,997    8,272   

     Taxes based on
       miscellaneous income       (205)     252      121    1,068      172   
  
     One third of applicable
       rentals charged to
       operating expense
      (which approximates the
      interest factor)             291      288      287      284      279   
                               -------------------------------------------
        Total Earnings         $69,460  $49,846  $51,536  $57,729  $42,611   
                               ===========================================
 
Interest on long-term debt     $13,939  $12,544  $12,626  $14,415  $13,803
Other interest                   4,008    5,983    3,768    1,798    1,811   
  
One-third of applicable rentals
  charged to operating expense
  (which approximates the
  interest factor)                 291      288      287      284      279
                               -------------------------------------------
   Total Fixed Charges         $18,238  $18,815  $16,681  $16,497  $15,893   
                               ===========================================

Ratio of Earnings to 
  Fixed Charges                   3.81     2.65     3.09     3.50     2.68


</TABLE>
                                   74
§ 33.94 Blade containment and rotor unbalance tests. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, it must be demonstrated by engine tests that the engine is capable of containing damage without catching fire and without failure of its mounting attachments when operated for at least 15 seconds, unless the resulting engine damage induces a self shutdown, after each of the following events: ( 1 ) Failure of the most critical compressor or fan blade while operating at maximum permissible r.p.m. The blade failure must occur at the outermost retention groove or, for integrally-bladed rotor discs, at least 80 percent of the blade must fail.
( 2 ) Failure of the most critical turbine blade while operating at maximum permissible r.p.m. The blade failure must occur at the outermost retention groove or, for integrally-bladed rotor discs, at least 80 percent of the blade must fail. The most critical turbine blade must be determined by considering turbine blade weight and the strength of the adjacent turbine case at case temperatures and pressures associated with operation at maximum permissible r.p.m.
( b ) Analysis based on rig testing, component testing, or service experience may be substitute for one of the engine tests prescribed in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section if— ( 1 ) That test, of the two prescribed, produces the least rotor unbalance; and
( 2 ) The analysis is shown to be equivalent to the test.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, and 603, Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, and 1423); and 49 U.S.C. 106(g) Revised, Pub. L. 97-449, Jan. 12, 1983)
[Amdt. 33-10, 49 FR 6854, Feb. 23, 1984]
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

HUMBERTO CEBALLOS, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00059-CR

Appeal from the

34th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20170D00479)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Appellant’s motion to withdraw appeal, and 

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed, in accordance with 

the opinion of this Court. We therefore dismiss the appeal. This decision shall be certified below 

for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Rodriguez, J., Palafox, J., and Barajas, Senior Judge

Barajas, Senior Judge (Sitting by Assignment)
OFFlCE OF THE AITORNEY GENERAL OF **TEXAS AUSTIN** 



### Hon.J.a.ccwdy **Counts Auditor**  Wlohlta **Caunty** Wlahlta **Falls,** Texam

le 2688 Yernon*s Annohat the Supeslnten&ent the C&ssioners' Court e Court House, and with neoure andfixtures. Wewould ng advised by yaur department an adUfn(3machine oould be olasss provision andwhether or not the

ktiole 2688, Vernon's Aunotated Civil Statutes, after nakm provision r0r theeleotion of a County Super-

### 872

Hon. J. C. Gaudy, Page 2

lntendent provides a8 follovtsr

(Fie)n8hall be provided by the Commiasion- .ers* Courtwith an office in tho omrthouse, andwith neoeesary offloe furniture and fixturea.” Addltloual statutqry proviso8 pertinent to our question r0imt

Article 3S99b (21, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statuten, provides thatr

“Suitable offiges and stationery and blanks neoeesary in fha performmoe of their duttes mayin the disoretion of the %mmissioners* Court also be furnished to...... County Superlntendenta........and mppbe paid for on order of the Cosmissioneis’ Court out of the County Treasury.” Arttole 2700; Revfsed Civil Statutes, 1925, after fixing the salaries ot.County Superintendents once population baels provides:

*In making the annual par oapfta app&- tionment to the sohools, the oounty aohool @ustees shall also makean annual allowanoe **dut** of the State and county available funds for salary and expenses of the arfioe of the oounty superintendent..... The oounty board **of truetees**  **may nalce**  suoh rurther provlsibnsae 

### itdeems neoeesary for orfloe andtraveling expenses for the oounty euper$ntendent....v Artiole 2700 

### d-l,provides! So. 1. “That

..... the salary and OrrIce expenses of the oounty superintendent of pub110 instruatlon,,...shall be paid out, of the eohool funds ,of thsoorsvon end Independent sohool dietriots of the oounty.” Seo. 

### 2. *That the County Eoard of Trustees shall annually

....ordcr a aoholastio per oapita

### t3Y4

mm; J. C. Oondy, Page 4
mperlntendent

. Further, we have been unable to rind any other statutory or aoans%ltutional p~ovlslon whiah might oonferthat necessary authority. Suohwas the oonstntatiion &Den these statutory prwlslons in departmental option 210.-7, Dook 56, page 127 date4 Septeabar 2& Z921, by 1:. C. Sutton, Assistant Attorney General, toHan. 0. L. Orouoh andwhiohthia opinion substantlatea.

Therefore, it la our opinion and you ara respedtttally edvlaed that the.Ca&asloners* Court my uat ttaemoney dbxfved frcm the generaliunds & the oounty to Lisa an adding mohine for the oounty qwrintendent's

. l'rustm that the above t3at+l'aatoriiy answers you2 Inquiry, we remain Very truly your0 AT'kORl?ST

CEEtlERAL

OFTEXAS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1460
RHONDA R. LILLIE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LIFETOUCH NATIONAL SCHOOL STUDIOS, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at N orfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-245-2) Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: February 24, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rhonda R. Lillie, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Edwin Miller, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Rhonda R. Lillie appeals the district court's order granting the Defendant summary judgment on her employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinionand find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lillie v. Lifetouch National School Studios , No. CA-96-245-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 5, 1997). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ ̈¦15 

§ ̈¦15 

GLACIER 

£¤89

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
 

HiLine District 

Rights-ofWay (ROW)

Comparison of Alternatives
 

Maps show the

Transportation/Utility Corridors 

and Rights-of-Way

Avoidance/Exclusion areas for

Alternatives C & D. Alternative

C has a one mile wide corridor 

along the Northern Border

Pipeline and remaining corridors

follow roadways and extend one 

mile on either side of the center

line. Alternative D has no

designated Corridors. 

Towns 

# Communication Sites 

ROW Avoidance area 

ROW Exclusion area 

RMP boundary

County Line 

Canada 

Interstate ¬ 

Highway or State Route 

Albers Equal Area, NAD83, Meters Created by the Malta Field Office in December 2012 

GLACIER 

£¤89

A Allb be er rt ta a

SSaass kka attcchheewwaan n

#
 #
 ")232

Browning Cut Bank TOOLE 

LIBERTY 

Shelby 

HILL 

£¤2

Chester Havre Chinook #

#
 

CHOUTEAU 

# Fort Benton 

£¤87

BLAINE # 

66 191

PH

") £¤

VALLEY 

# # Malta #

Glasgow 

ILLIPS 

Map W.2 

Alternative C 

0 25 50 

Miles 

1:2,300,000 

Alternative D 

A Allb be er rt ta a

SSaass kka att cchheewwaan n

#
 #
 ")232

Browning Cut Bank TOOLE HILL 

£¤2

LIBERTY BLAINE 

# VALLEY 

Shelby 

Chester Havre Chinook #
 

Malta #

# # 

#
 Gl

This map is intended for display purposes.

No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy,

reliability, or completeness of these data for

individual or aggregate use with other data,

or for purposes not intended by the BLM.

This map may not meet National Map

Accuracy Standards. This product was

developed through digital means and

information may be updated without 

notification. 

CHOUTEAU

") £¤

£¤87 

66 191 

# PHILLIPS

Fort Benton 

asgow
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 99 (Monday, May 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 32086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12721]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-280-000]

U-T Offshore System, L.L.C.; Notice of Tariff Filing

May 16, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 10, 2000, U-T Offshore System, L.L.C. 
(UTOS), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the revised tariff sheets listed in Appendix A to 
the filing. UTOS proposes that the foregoing tariff sheets be made 
effective on June 1, 2000.
    UTOS states this filing is made to reflect ministerial tariff 
changes resulting from the assumption of operating duties by the El 
Paso Energy Partners Operating Company (EPNOC). UTOS further states 
that the instant filing specifically modifies the company's address, 
telephone numbers and personnel titles and designations from its 
currently effective tariff to conform with the changes due to the 
assumption of operating duties by EPNOC. UTOS further states that the 
changes effected by this filing are purely ministerial.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-12721 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ELGRANDE INTERNATIONAL, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael F. Holloran, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael F. Holloran

Michael F. Holloran

Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer



October 17, 2005