CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

*** TO BE COMPLETED BY DISTRICT AND RETURNED TO ARB ***

All rules submitted to the EPA as State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions must be supported by certain

information and documentation for the rule packages to be deemed complete for review by the EPA. Rules will not be evaluated for Approvability by the EPA unless the submittal packages are complete. To assist you in
determining that all necessary materials are included in rules packages s ent the ARB for submittal to the EPA, please fill out the following form and include it with the rule package you send ARB. See the ARB's Guidelines on the Implementation of the EPA’s Draft SIP Completeness Policy , October 1989, for a more detailed explan ation than
is provided here.

Agency: California Air Resources Board

Rule No: Title 17, California Code of Regulations, Subchapter 8.5, sections 9450 8

- 9451 7 (Article 2. Co n sumer Products, (the “Consumer Products Regulation”)

.

Rule Title: Article 2 “Con sumer Products”

Date Adopted or Amended:

Hearing Date Adopted Amended OAL Approval Implementation

September 24, 2009 N.A. 08

- 06

- 10 09

- 20

- 1 0 12

- 31

- 10 and 12

- 31

- 1 2*

* Materials for tier two implementation are not included in this submittal. Tier two implementation will be preceded

by a technical assessment in 2012. The p roposed tier two implementation date is 12

- 31

- 2013.

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS

Not

Attached Attached N/A
( x ) ( ) ( ) COMPLETE COPY OF THE RULE : Provide an unmarked copy of the
entire rule as adopted or amended by your District Board.

( x ) ( ) ( ) UNDERLINE AND STRIKEOUT COPY OF THE RULE : If an amended

rule, provide a complete copy of the rule indicating in underline and

strikeout format all language which has been added, deleted, or changed

since the rule was last adopted or amended.

() ( x ) () COMPLETE COPY OF THE REFERENCED RULE(S): For any rule which includes language specifically referencing another rule, a copy of that

other rule must also be submitted, unless it has already been submitted to EPA as part of a previous SIP submittal.

( x ) ( ) ( ) PUBLIC NOTICE EVIDENCE: Include a copy of the local newspaper clipping certification(s), stating the date of publication, which must be at least 30 days before the hearing. As an alternative, include a copy of the actual published notice of the public hearing as it appeared in the local newspaper(s). In this case, however, enough of the newspaper page
must be included to show the date of pub lication. the notice must specifically identify by title and number each rule adopted or amended.

( x ) ( ) ( ) RESOLUTION/MINUTE ORDER: Provide the Board Clerk certified

resolution or minute order. This document must include certification that

the hea ring was held in accordance with the information in the public

notice. It must also list the rules that were adopted or amended, the date of the public hearing, and a statement of compliance with California Health and Safety Code Sections 40725

- 40728 (Adm inistrative Procedures Act).

( x ) ( ) () PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES: Submit copies of written public
comments made during the notice period and at the public hearing. Also submit any written responses prepared by the District staff or presentedCALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

to the District Board at the public hearing. A summary of the public
comments and responses is adequate. If there were no comments made during the notice period or at the hearing, please indicate N/A to the left.

TECHNICAL MATERIALS

Not

Attach ed Attached N/A
( x ) ( ) ( ) RULE EVALUATION FORM: See instructions for completing the Rule Evaluation Form and the accompanying sample form.

( ) ( ) ( x ) NON

- EPA TEST METHOD: Include all test methods that are referenced

in the rule, but not previousl y submitted to EPA. Provide an explanat i on of the purpose and principle for the test method and include the following supporting technical data: describe the test details (number of tests to be carried out, their precision accuracy, and repeatability); on a technical basis, compare the method with the appropriate EPA/ASTM method;
explain the technical differences of the two methods and how they affect monitoring of the parameters of interest; explain how the test method
affects the implementation and enfor cement of the applicable rule; explain the advantages and any potential shortcomings of the test

method.

( ) ( ) ( x ) MODELING SUPPORT: Provide if appropriate; in general modeling support is not required for VOC and NOx rules to determine their impacts
on ozone levels. Modeling is required where a rule is a relaxation that affects large sources ( > 100 TPY) in an attainment area for SO2, directly emitted PM10, CO, or NOx (for NO2 purposes). In cases where EPA is

concerned with the impact on air quality of rule revisions which relax
limits or cause a shift in emission patterns in a nonattainment area, a reference back to the approved SIP will be sufficient provided the approved SIP used the current EPA modeling guidelines. If current EPA
modeling guideli nes were not used, then new modeling may be required.

() ( ) ( x ) ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS

FROM EPA POLICIES : As appropriate, describe special circumstances, i.e., where alternative RACT is used, extended compliance data are

i ncluded, etc. A completed SIP Approvability Checklist

- Enforceability will fulfill this requirement.

( x ) ( ) ( ) ADDITIONAL MATERIALS : Provide any other supporting information concerning development of the rule or rule changes, such as staff

reports.

(ARBFORM

- 6/93)