alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32000R0549 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R0549

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 549/2000 of 14 March 2000 determining the rice intervention centres **

*
Official Journal L 067 , 15/03/2000 P. 0014 - 0015 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 549/2000

of 14 March 2000

determining the rice intervention centres

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3072/95 of 22 December 1995 on the common organisation of the market in rice(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2072/98(2), and in particular Article 8(a) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2047/84(3) determines the rice intervention centres other than Vercelli. That Regulation has been amended several times, most recently by Regulation (EC) No 695/98(4). For reasons of clarity it should be replaced in its entirety.

(2) Following consultations with the Member States concerned, the list of intervention centres in Spain and Greece should be amended.

(3) Those measures should take effect from the start of the period of application of the intervention arrangements.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The intervention centres mentioned in Article 3(3) of Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 are listed in the Annex.

Article 2

Regulation (EEC) No 2047/84 is hereby repealed.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 1 April 2000.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 March 2000.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 329, 30.12.1995, p. 18.

(2) OJ L 265, 30.9.1998, p. 4.

(3) OJ L 190, 18.7.1984, p. 5.

(4) OJ L 96, 28.3.1998, p. 20.

ANNEX

1. SPAIN

>TABLE>

2. FRANCE

>TABLE>

3. GREECE

>TABLE>

4. ITALY

>TABLE>

5. PORTUGAL

>TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 32000D0787 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000D0787

**2000/787/EC: Council Decision of 23 November 2000 on the signing, on behalf of the European Community, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the People's Republic of China initialled in Beijing on 19 May 2000 amending the Agreement between them on trade in textile products and amending the Agreement between them initialled on 19 January 1995 on trade in textile products not covered by the MFA bilateral Agreement, and authorising its provisional application **

*
Official Journal L 314 , 14/12/2000 P. 0013 - 0013 *

Council Decision

of 23 November 2000

on the signing, on behalf of the European Community, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the People's Republic of China initialled in Beijing on 19 May 2000 amending the Agreement between them on trade in textile products and amending the Agreement between them initialled on 19 January 1995 on trade in textile products not covered by the MFA bilateral Agreement, and authorising its provisional application

(2000/787/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community and in particular Article 133 thereof, in conjunction with Article 300, paragraph 2, first sentence thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

(1) The Commission has negotiated on behalf of the European Community an Agreement on trade in textile products with the People's Republic of China.

(2) The Agreement was initialled on 19 May 2000.

(3) The Agreement should be signed on behalf of the European Community.

(4) It is necessary to apply this Agreement on a provisional basis pending the completion of the relevant procedures for its formal conclusion, subject to reciprocity,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Subject to the conclusion thereof, the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the People's Republic of China initialled in Beijing on 19 May 2000 amending the Agreement between them on trade in textile products and amending the Agreement between them initialled on 19 January 1995 on trade in textile products not covered by the MFA bilateral Agreement, both as last amended by the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters initialled on 6 December 1999, shall be signed on behalf of the European Community.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the persons empowered to sign the Agreement on behalf of the Community.

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

Article 3

The Agreement shall be applied on a provisional basis pending the completion of the procedures for its conclusion, subject to reciprocity(1).

Done at Brussels, 23 November 2000.

For the Council

The President

C. Tasca

(1) The date of commencement of provisional application will be 24 November 2000.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 946 

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to reauthorize the McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2007 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mrs. DOLE, Mrs. CLINTON, and Mr. ROBERTS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act 

of 2002 to reauthorize the McGovern-Dole International 

Food for Education and Child Nutrition Program, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF MCGOVERN–DOLE 

4 INTERNATIONAL FOOD FOR EDUCATION AND 

5 CHILD NUTRITION PROGRAM. 

6 (a) ADMINISTRATION OF PROGRAM.—Section 3107 

7 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 

8 (7 U.S.C. 1736o–1) is amended— 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 946 IS

1 (1) in subsection (d), in the matter preceding 

2 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘The President shall des3 ignate 1 or more Federal agencies to’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘The Secretary shall’’; 

5 (2) in subsection (f)(2), in the matter preceding 

6 subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘implementing agen7 cy’’ and inserting ‘‘Secretary’’; and 

8 (3) in subsections (c)(2)(B), (f)(1), (h)(1) and 

9 (2), and (i), by striking ‘‘President’’ each place it 

10 appears and inserting ‘‘Secretary’’. 

11 (b) FUNDING.—Section 3107(l) of the Farm Security 

12 and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 1736o–1(l)) 

13 is amended— 

14 (1) by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and in15 serting the following: 

16 ‘‘(1) USE OF COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATION

17 FUNDS.—Of the funds of the Commodity Credit 

18 Corporation, the Secretary shall use to carry out this 

19 section— 

20 ‘‘(A) not less than $140,000,000 for fiscal 

21 year 2008; 

22 ‘‘(B) not less than $180,000,000 for fiscal 

23 year 2009; 

24 ‘‘(C) not less than $220,000,000 for fiscal 

25 year 2010; 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•S 946 IS

1 ‘‘(D) not less than $260,000,000 for fiscal 

2 year 2011; and 

3 ‘‘(E) not less than $300,000,000 for fiscal 

4 year 2012.’’; 

5 (2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as para6 graph (2); and 

7 (3) in paragraph (2) (as redesignated by para8 graph (2)), by striking ‘‘any Federal agency imple9 menting or assisting’’ and inserting ‘‘the Depart10 ment of Agriculture or any other Federal agency as11 sisting’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
§ 1641.6 Processing of charges filed with EEOC. ( a ) *ADA cause charges falling within the jurisdiction of section 503 that the Commission has declined to litigate.* ADA cause charges that also fall within the jurisdiction of section 503 and that the Commission has declined to litigate will be referred to OFCCP for review of the file and any administrative action deemed appropriate under section 503. Such charges will be considered to be complaints, simultaneously dual filed under section 503, solely for the purposes of OFCCP review and administrative action described in this paragraph.
( b ) *ADA charges which also include allegations of failure to comply with section 503 affirmative action requirements.* ADA charges filed with EEOC, in which both allegations of discrimination under the ADA and violation of affirmative action requirements under section 503 are made, will be referred in their entirety to OFCCP for processing and resolution under section 503 and the ADA, unless the charges also include allegations of discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or age, or include allegations involving Priority List issues, or the charges are otherwise deemed of particular importance to EEOC's enforcement of the ADA. In such situations, EEOC will bifurcate the charges and retain the ADA component of the charges (and when applicable, the allegations pertaining to discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or age), referring the section 503 affirmative action component of the charges to OFCCP for processing and resolution under section 503. ADA charges which raise both discrimination issues under the ADA and section 503 affirmative action issues will be considered complaints, simultaneously dual filed under section 503, solely for the purposes of referral to OFCCP for processing, as described in this paragraph.
( c ) EEOC shall transfer promptly to OFCCP a charge of disability-related employment discrimination over which it does not have jurisdiction, but over which OFCCP may have jurisdiction. At the same time, EEOC shall notify the charging party and the contractor/respondent of the transfer, the reason for the transfer, the location of the OFCCP office to which the charge was transferred and that the date EEOC received the charge will be deemed the date it was received by OFCCP.
( d ) Except as otherwise stated in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, individuals alleging violations of laws enforced by DOL and over which EEOC has no jurisdiction will be referred to DOL to file a complaint.
( e ) If an individual who has already filed an ADA charge with EEOC subsequently attempts to file or files a section 503 complaint with OFCCP covering the same facts and issues, OFCCP will accept the complaint, but will adopt as a disposition of the complaint EEOC's resolution of the ADA charge (including EEOC's termination of proceedings upon its issuance of a notice of right-to-sue).
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

HiLine District 

Soils

Reclamation Suitability

&

Potential Prime Farmland
 

Maps show the reclamation
 

suitability and potential prime
 

farmland soil mapping units within

the planning area.
 

¬ 

Created by the Malta Field Office in December 2012 Albers Equal Area, NAD83, Meters 

Glacier 

National Park 

Blackfeet Indian 

Reservation 

Ft. Belknap 

Rocky Boys Indian Reservation 

Indian Reservation 

CMR National

Wildlife Refuge 

Soils Reclamation Suitability 

Map W.12 

0 25 50
 

Miles
 

1:2,300,000
 

Glacier 

National Park 

Blackfeet Indian 

Reservation 

Poorly suited 

Non Project Areas 

Soils Potential Prime Farmland 

Rocky Boys Ft. Belknap
 

Indian Reservation Indian Reservation
 

This map is intended for display purposes. 

No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, 

reliability, or completeness of these data

for individual or aggregate use with other 

data, or for purposes not intended by the 

BLM. This map may not meet National

Map Accuracy Standards. This product 

was developed through digital means and 

information may be updated without 

notification. 

Prime farmland 

Non Project Areas 

CMR National

Wildlife Refuge
§ 102.161 Notification. ( a ) The Agency must send a written demand to the debtor in terms which inform the debtor of the consequences of failure to cooperate. In the demand letter, the Agency must provide the name of an Agency employee who can provide a full explanation of the claim. When the Agency deems it appropriate to protect the Government's interests (for example, to prevent the statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. 2415, from expiring), written demand may be preceded by other appropriate actions.
( b ) In accordance with guidelines established by the Agency, the Agency official responsible for collection of the debt must send written notice to the debtor, informing the debtor, as appropriate, of the: ( 1 ) Nature and amount of the Board's claim;
( 2 ) Date by which payment is to be made (which normally may be not more than 30 days from the date that the initial notification was mailed or hand delivered);
( 3 ) Agency's intent to collect by administrative offset and of the debtor's rights in conjunction with such an offset;
( 4 ) Agency's intent to collect, as appropriate, interest, penalties, administrative costs and attorneys fees;
( 5 ) Rights of the debtor to a full explanation of the claim, of the opportunity to inspect and copy Agency records with respect to the claim and to dispute any information in the Agency's records concerning the claim;
( 6 ) Debtor's right to administrative appeal or review within the Agency concerning the Agency's claim and how such review must be obtained;
( 7 ) Debtor's opportunity to enter into a written agreement with the Agency to repay the debt; and
( 8 ) Date on which, or after which, an administrative offset will begin.
[82 FR 11784, Feb. 24, 2017]
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 1, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131406 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131406 

 COA: 266959 

Kalamazoo CC: 04-002204-FH 

CORAL EUGENE WATTS,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 25, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that portion of the Court of Appeals 

judgment that remands the case to the district court with directions to reconsider its 

bindover decision. Here, the Kalamazoo Circuit Court failed in its duty to determine 

whether the 8th District Court abused its discretion in ordering the case to be bound over. 

The circuit court erred in determining that a ground existed to dismiss or remand to the 

district court under MCR 6.110(H). The district court was not prohibited by MCR 

6.110(D) from considering properly admitted other-acts evidence under MRE 404(b). 

Further, MCR 6.110(C) was not violated because the proceedings held in district court 

were conducted in accordance with the rules of evidence. Thus, we REMAND this case 

to the Kalamazoo Circuit Court for further proceedings as otherwise directed by the 

Court of Appeals. 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

s1025 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 1, 2006 

 Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Geosciences (1756).                    

*Date & Time:*                         June 5-6, 2000, 8 A.M.                    

*Place:*                         Room 730, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Michael Mayhew, Program Director, Education and Human Resources Program, Division of Earth Sciences, Room 785, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 306-1557.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate proposals submitted to the Geoscience Education Panel, as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: May 12, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-12449 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Petty, Chaf in and Senior Judge Annunziata

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES/ COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 0377-13-1 PER CURIAM AUGUST 6, 2013 JOHNICAL M. OWENS

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Attorney General; Wesley G. Russell, Jr., Deputy Attorney General; Peter R. Messitt, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Scott John Fitzgerald, Senior Assistant Attorney General, on brief), for appellant. (Joseph A. Miller; Joe Miller La w Ltd., on brief), for appellee.
The Department of Social Services/Commonwealth of Virg inia (“employer”) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Co mmission (“the commission”) denying employer’s request for a termination of the award of bene fits and finding employer had a gross subrogation interest for medical and indemnity expenses of an amount less than the amount claimed by employer. Employer argues the commission erred in: (1) not terminating the benefits award of Johnical M. Owens when Owens settled an under lying tort suit without the consent of the employer; (2) not including temporary total and te mporary partial disability benefits awarded in the October 2005 claim in the amount owed to employer in satisfaction of its workers’ compensation lien and subrogation in terest; and (3) not awarding to employer the full amount of its workers’ compensation lien and subrogation intere st as a credit against future benefits. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.UNPUBLISHED- 2 - merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons st ated by the commission in its final opinion. See Owens v. Department of Soc. Servs./Comm onwealth of Virginia, JCN 228-59-65 (Jan. 29, 2013). We dispense with oral argument and su mmarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma terials before the Cour t and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 57 FR 31451, July 16, 1992.

#### § 20.54 Notification of charges.

The agency head (or designee) responsible for carrying out the provisions of this subpart shall mail or hand-deliver an initial demand for payment to the debtor. In the initial demand, the debtor shall be notified that interest on the debt will start to accrue from the date on which the notice is mailed or hand-delivered, but that payment of interest will be waived if the debt is paid by the due date, or within 30 days of the date of notice, if no due date is specified. The initial demand shall also state that administrative costs of recovering the delinquent debt will be assessed if payment is not received by the due date.
§ 1960.89 Organization. ( a ) Field council officers shall include, as a minimum, a chairperson, vice chairperson, and secretary. Officers shall be elected for a one or two-year term on a calendar year basis by a majority vote of the designated representatives. Election of officers shall be held at least 60 days before the beginning of a calendar year. The election may be conducted at a regularly scheduled meeting or by letter ballot.
( b ) Each council shall notify the appropriate OSHA Regional Office and the Office of Federal Agency Safety and Health Programs of the name, agency address, and telephone number of each newly elected official.
( c ) Each council shall have an Executive Committee consisting of all elected officers, chairpersons of appointed committees and the immediate past chairperson of the field council.
( d ) In addition to the Executive Committee, each council shall have either a membership committee, a program committee and a finance committee, or a council official designated responsibility in these areas. Additional committees may be appointed by the chairperson for specific purposes as warranted.