alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lite King Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


Date:    February 23, 2006               By:
                                                  ------------------------------
                                         Name:    David L. Norris
                                         Title:   President and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lite King Corporation
and will be retained by Lite King Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Ford Lumber & Building Supply, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 61619

)

Under Contract No. DACA27-1-96-9 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Dean Ford

 Corporate Officer

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

 Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

R. Lauren Horner, Esq.

 Engineer Trial Attorney

 U.S. Army Engineer District, Louisville 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The appeal has been withdrawn. Accordingly, it is dismissed from the Board’s 

docket with prejudice.

Dated: March 17, 2021

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61619, Appeal of Ford Lumber & 

Building Supply, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: March 17, 2021

DAVID D’ALESSANDRIS

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
§ 2204.302 Net worth exhibit. ( a ) Each applicant except a qualified tax-exempt organization, cooperative association, or, in the case of an application for an award related to an allegedly excessive demand by the Secretary, a small entity as that term is defined by 5 U.S.C. 601(6), shall provide with its application a detailed exhibit showing the net worth of the applicant as required by § 2204.301(c) when the proceeding was initiated. The exhibit may be in any form convenient to the applicant that provides full disclosure of the applicant's assets and liabilities and is sufficient to determine whether the applicant qualifies as a party as defined in § 2204.201. The judge or Commission may require an applicant to file additional information to determine its eligibility for an award.
( b ) Ordinarily, the net worth exhibit will be included in the public record of the proceeding. However, an applicant that objects to public disclosure of information in any portion of the exhibit and believes there are legal grounds for withholding it from disclosure may request that the documents be filed under seal or otherwise be treated as confidential, pursuant to §§ 2200.8 and 2200.52 of this chapter.
[86 FR 26659, May 17, 2021, as amended at 86 FR 31166, June 11, 2021]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Housing Finance Board

## Announcing an Open Meeting of the Board 

# TIME AND DATE: 

10 a.m., Monday, May 22, 2000. 

# PLACE: 

Board Room, Second Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board, 1777 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006. 

# STATUS: 

The entire meeting will be open to the public. 

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED DURING PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC:

      - Proposed Rule: FHLBank Capital Structure.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Elaine L. Baker, Secretary to the Board, (202) 408-2837. 

William W. Ginsberg, 

Managing Director. 

[FR Doc. 00-12631 Filed 5-16-00; 2:22 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
#### § 1977.23 State plans.

A State which is implementing its own occupational safety and health enforcement program pursuant to section 18 of the Act and parts 1902 and 1952 of this chapter must have provisions as effective as those of section 11(c) to protect employees from discharge or discrimination. Such provisions do not divest either the Secretary of Labor or Federal district courts of jurisdiction over employee complaints of discrimination. However, the Secretary of Labor may refer complaints of employees adequately protected by State Plans' provisions to the appropriate state agency. The basic principles outlined in § 1977.18, supra will be observed as to deferrals to findings of state agencies.
§ 2580.412-10 Individual or schedule or blanket form of bonds. Section 13 provides that “any bond shall be in a form or of a type approved by the Secretary, including individual bonds or schedule or blanket forms of bonds which cover a group or class”. Any form of bond which may be described as individual, schedule or blanket in form or any combination of such forms of bonds shall be acceptable to meet the requirements of section 13, provided that in each case, the form of the bond, in its particular clauses and application, is not inconsistent with meeting the substantive requirements of the statute for the persons and plan involved and with meeting the specific requirements of the regulations in this part. Basic types of bonds in general usage are: ( a ) *Individual bond.* Covers a named individual in a stated penalty.
( b ) *Name schedule bond.* Covers a number of named individuals in the respective amounts set opposite their names.
( c ) *Position schedule bond.* Covers each of the occupants of positions listed in the schedule in the respective amounts set opposite such positions.
( d ) *Blanket bonds.* Cover all the insured's officers and employees with no schedule or list of those covered being necessary and with all new officers and employees bonded automatically, in a blanket penalty which takes two forms—an aggregate penalty bond and a multiple penalty bond which are described below: ( 1 ) The aggregate penalty blanket bond such as the Commercial Blanket Bond; the amount of the bond is available for dishonesty losses caused by persons covered thereunder or losses in which such person is concerned or implicated. Payment of loss on account of any such person does not reduce the amount of coverage available for losses other than those caused by such person or in which he was concerned or implicated.
( 2 ) The multiple penalty bond such as the Blanket Position Bond giving separate coverage on each person for a uniform amount—the net effect being the same as though a separate bond were issued on each person covered thereunder and all of such bonds being for a uniform amount. Note:
For the purpose of section 13, blanket bonds which are either aggregate penalty or multiple penalty in form shall be permissible if they otherwise meet the requirements of the Act and the regulations in this part.
Bonding, to the extent required, of persons indirectly employed, or otherwise delegated, to perform functions for the plan which are normally performed by “administrators, officers, or employees” as described in § 2580.412-3(d) may be accomplished either by including them under individual or schedule bonds or other forms of bonds meeting the requirements of the Act, or naming them in what is known under general trade usage as an “Agents Rider” attached to a Blanket Bond.
[No. 49134-2-I.

Division One.

December 23, 2002.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Susan Leslie Leisy, *Respondent,*and Bruce Wayne Miller, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 01-3-02301-6, Gregory P. Canova, J., entered July 25, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Serena Software, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended
July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert I. Pender, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods presented.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    ROBERT I. PENDER, JR.Robert I. Pender, Jr.
Senior Vice President, Finance And
Administration, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial And Accounting
Officer)


Date:
September 14, 2010

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Serena
Software, Inc. and will be retained by Serena Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                  OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         I, David Olson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of iGo Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of iGo Corporation.

                                                  By: /s/ David Olson
                                                      --------------------------
                                                  Name: David Olson
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer

         I, Scott Shackelton, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of iGo Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of iGo Corporation.

                                                  By: /s/ Scott Shackelton
                                                      --------------------------
                                                  Name: Scott Shackelton
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer


         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of such Quarterly Report or
as a separate disclosure document.
#### VAN DEMARK et v TOMPKINS Exr et

Ohio Supreme Court

No. 21542.

Decided June 12, 1929

Syllabus by

DAY, J.

DECEDENTS’ ESTATES

(220 Wb) In an action to contest a will, the jury should be instructed that, before it would be justified in setting aside a will, the evidence tending to invalidate the will must outweigh both the evidence tending to sustain the will and the presumption arising from the order of the probate court admitting the will to probate as the valid last will and testament of the testator. Instructions should not limit the determination of such issue to the evidence introduced by either party exclusively, but the issue should be determined by the preponderance of all the evidence adduced in the case, regardless of which party may have called a witness or adduced the evidence. (Hall v Hall, Exr., 78 Ohio St., 415, explained; Kennedy v Walcutt, 118 Ohio St., 442, approved and followed.)

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, CJ., Kinkade, Robinson, Jones, Matthias and Allen, JJ, concur.
# EUR-Lex - 32000R2882 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R2882

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2882/2000 of 27 December 2000 amending Regulation (EC) No 2331/97 on special conditions for granting export refunds on certain pigmeat products **

*
Official Journal L 333 , 29/12/2000 P. 0072 - 0073 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 2882/2000

of 27 December 2000

amending Regulation (EC) No 2331/97 on special conditions for granting export refunds on certain pigmeat products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in pigmeat(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1365/2000(2), and in particular Article 13(12) and Article 22 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2331/97(3), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 739/98(4), lays down quality criteria to be met for the granting of export refunds on certain pigmeat products.

(2) Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87, of 17 December 1987 establishing an agricultural product nomenclature for export refunds(5), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2425/2000(6), lists the pigmeat products on which export refunds may be granted.

(3) The product codes listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2331/97 must be brought into line with recent amendments to Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 and higher quality criteria must be set for products covered by CN code 1601 00 91 not containing poultrymeat in order to use the available resources more efficiently.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Pigmeat,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The entries relating to CN code 1601 00 91 in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2331/97 are hereby replaced by those set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 1 January 2001.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 December 2000.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 156, 29.6.2000, p. 5.

(3) OJ L 323, 26.11.1997, p. 19.

(4) OJ L 102, 2.4.1998, p. 22.

(5) OJ L 366, 24.12.1987, p. 1.

(6) OJ L 279, 1.11.2000, p. 14.

ANNEX

>TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 32000D0288 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000D0288

**2000/288/EC: Commission Decision of 4 April 2000 amending Decision 92/486/EEC on the form of cooperation between the ANIMO host centre and the Member States (notified under document number C(2000) 922) (Text with EEA relevance.) **

*
Official Journal L 098 , 19/04/2000 P. 0037 - 0037 *

Commission Decision

of 4 April 2000

amending Decision 92/486/EEC on the form of cooperation between the ANIMO host centre and the Member States

(notified under document number C(2000) 922)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2000/288/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning the veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market(1), as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC(2), and in particular Article 20(3) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Various Community studies and seminars indicate that the ANIMO network architecture should be reviewed so that a veterinary system integrating various computerised applications can be implemented.

(2) Decision 92/486/EEC of 25 September 1992 establishing the form of cooperation between the ANIMO host centre and the Member States(3), as last amended by Decision 1999/716/EC(4), should be amended so as to guarantee the continuity of the ANIMO network.

(3) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following paragraph is added to Article 2(a) of Decision 92/486/EEC:

"5. For the period from 1 April 2000 to 31 March 2001 the coordination authorities provided for in Article 1 shall ensure that the contracts referred to in that Article are extended for one year.

The following charge shall apply in respect of this paragraph:

EUR 386 per unit (central unit, local unit, frontier inspection post) for all the ANIMO units listed in Decision 2000/287/EC(5)."

Article 2

This Decision is applicable from 1 April 2000.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 April 2000.

For the Commission

David BYRNE

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 29.

(2) OJ L 62, 15.3.1993, p. 49.

(3) OJ L 291, 7.10.1992, p. 20.

(4) OJ L 289, 11.11.1999, p. 1.

(5) OJ L 98, 19.4.2000, p. 12
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 24

                            THE LAMSON & SESSIONS CO.

                          DIRECTORS' POWER OF ATTORNEY

         Each of the undersigned members of the Board of Directors of The Lamson
& Sessions Co., an Ohio corporation, which anticipates filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D. C., an annual report of the
Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2004 ("2003 Form
10-K") under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, does
hereby constitute and appoint James J. Abel and John B. Schulze, jointly and
severally, with full power and substitution and re-substitution, as attorney(s)
to sign for him and in his name, in the capacities indicated below, the 2003
Form 10-K, including any amendments and exhibits thereto, with full power and
authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever necessary and
required to be done in connection with such signing as fully to all intents and
purposes as he would do if personally present, hereby ratifying and approving
the acts of said attorney(s) and any substitute(s) therefor in connection with
such signing:

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands as of
the 19th day of February 2004.

/s/ James T. Bartlett            /s/ John C. Dannemiller
--------------------------       -------------------------
James T. Bartlett                John C. Dannemiller
Director                         Director

/s/ Francis H. Beam, Jr.         /s/ George R. Hill
--------------------------       -------------------------
Francis H. Beam, Jr.             George R. Hill
Director                         Director

/s/ William H. Coquillette       /s/ A. Malachi Mixon, III
--------------------------       -------------------------
William H. Coquillette           A. Malachi Mixon, III
Director                         Director

/s/ Martin J. Cleary             /s/ D. Van Skilling
--------------------------       -------------------------
Martin J. Cleary                 D. Van Skilling
Director                         Director
#### § 2204.303 Documentation of fees and expenses.

The application shall be accompanied by adequate documentation of the fees and other expenses incurred after the initiation of the adversary adjudication, including, but not limited to, the reasonable cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, or project. An application seeking an increase in fees to account for inflation pursuant to § 2200.406 of this chapter shall also include adequate documentation of the change in the consumer price index for the attorney or agent's locality. With respect to a claim for fees and expenses involving an excessive demand by the Secretary, the application shall be accompanied by adequate documentation of such fees and expenses incurred after initiation of the adversary adjudication for which an award is sought attributable to the portion of the demand alleged to be excessive and unreasonable. A separate itemized statement shall be submitted for each professional firm or individual whose services are covered by the application, showing the hours spent in connection with the proceeding by each individual, a description of the specific services performed, the rate at which each fee has been computed, any expenses for which reimbursement is sought, the total amount claimed, and the total amount paid or payable by the applicant or by any other person or entity for the services provided. The judge or Commission may require the applicant to provide vouchers, receipts, or other substantiation for any fees or expenses claimed.