alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Paul L. D’Agostino, Appellant.

[696 NYS2d 898]

—Appeal by the *228defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), rendered March 13, 1998, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of attempted robbery in the first degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that the People did not adduce legally sufficient evidence to establish the crime of attempted robbery in the first degree. Therefore, that conviction is reversed, the sentence imposed thereon is vacated, and that count of the indictment is dismissed.

The remainder of the defendant’s claims regarding the alleged insufficiency of the evidence are unpreserved for appellate review *(see, e.g., People v Johnson,*185 AD2d 247; *see also, People v Bynum,*70 NY2d 858; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245, 250). In any event, they are meritless. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt as to the other crimes was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

Viewing the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of the case, we conclude that the defendant was afforded meaningful representation of counsel *(see, People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.
# EUR-Lex - 31998F0123(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998F0123(01)

**Council Act of 18 December 1997 drawing up, on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, the Convention on mutual assistance and cooperation between customs administrations - Declarations **

*
Official Journal C 024 , 23/01/1998 P. 0001 - 0001 *

COUNCIL ACT of 18 December 1997 drawing up, on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, the Convention on mutual assistance and cooperation between customs administrations (98/C 24/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular point c of Article K.3(2) thereof,

Whereas for the purposes of achieving the objectives of the Union, Member States regard customs cooperation as a matter of common interest, coming under the cooperation provided for in Title VI of the Treaty;

HAVING DECIDED that the Convention, the text of which is given in the Annex and which has been signed today by the representatives of the Governments of the Member States, is hereby drawn up,

RECOMMENDS that it be adopted by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

Done at Brussels, 18 December 1997.

For the Council

The President

F. BODEN
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT



### WILLIAM KREEGAR and JANICE ) KREEGAR, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-3520 ) NAPLES ESTATES LIMITED ) PARTNERSHIP, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 23, 2020. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Joseph G. Foster, Judge. Donald E. Christopher of Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, Orlando, for Appellants. J. Allen Bobo and Jody B. Gabel of Lutz, Bobo & Telfair, P.A., Sarasota, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT
32.1






Statement Pursuant to
Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The
undersigned, Daniel Dror, CEO and Chairman of American International Industries,
Inc., a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required
by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the
following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2008.






The
undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all
respects, the financial condition of American International Industries, Inc. and
results of its operations.






Date:  November
14, 2008


Daniel
Dror


Chairman


/s/ Daniel
Dror
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-266-000]

Take notice that on May 1, 2000, TransColorado Gas Transmission Company (TransColorado) tenders for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, Fourth Revised Sheet No. 247 and First Revised Sheet No. 247A, to be effective June 1, 2000.

TransColorado states that the tariff sheets sets forth TransColorado's Fuel Gas Reimbursement Percentage (FGRP) calculation. The proposed tariff sheets revise the monthly variance calculations to state that the variance-adjustment component of the FGRP will be calculated on an annual basis instead of monthly.

TransColorado stated that a copy of this filing has been served upon its customers, the New Mexico Public Utilities Commission and the Colorado Public Utilities Commission.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www. ferc.fed.us/online/ rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-11623  Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Alton L. Boynton, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

Date: May 13, 2005


/s/ Alton L. Boynton
----------------------------------
Alton L. Boynton
President
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4713 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt a portion of 

unemployment compensation received during 2020 from income taxes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2020 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Ms. BALDWIN, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. REED, and Ms. 

HIRONO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

a portion of unemployment compensation received during 

2020 from income taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coronavirus Unem5 ployment Benefits Tax Relief Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4713 IS

1 SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF TAX ON PORTION OF UNEMPLOY2 MENT COMPENSATION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 85 of the Internal Rev4 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(c) SPECIAL RULE FOR 2020.—In the case of any 

7 taxable year beginning in 2020, gross income shall not in8 clude so much of the unemployment compensation received 

9 by an individual as does not exceed $10,200.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

12 December 31, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### KEELING v. THE STATE.

(Decided January 30, 1917.)

Appeal from Gadsden City Court.

Heard before Hon. James A. Bilbro.

No counsel marked for appellant.

W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
§ ̈¦15 

§ ̈¦15 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

HiLine District 

Off-Highway Vehicle

(OHV) Designations

Alternatives A & E 

Maps depict the existing OHV

designations for Alternatives A and

the proposed OHV designations for

Alternative E. 

Proposed designations apply only

to BLM-administered lands. 

Created by the Malta Field Office in December 2012 ¬ Albers Equal Area, NAD83, Meters 

Open

Limited, Designated 

Limited, Existing

Closed 

RMP Boundary

County

Interstate 

Highway or State Route 

Towns 

A All b be er rt ta a Glacier

National Park SSaass kka att cchheewwaann

Blackfeet Indian

Reservation
 

232 

89 2

")

£¤ £¤

GLACIER
 HILL
 

Browning Cut Bank TOOLE 

BLAINE
 

LIBERTY
 VALLEY
 

Shelby Chester 

Chinook Havre 

CHOUTEAU
 66 

191 

Fort Benton 

£¤

CMR National

Wildlife Refuge 

")

£¤87

Malta

Ft. Belknap Rocky Boy's Indian Reservation Indian Reservation Glasgow

PHILLIPS
 

Alternative A 

Map 2.6 

Fresno OHV area - 84 acres 

A All b be er rt ta a Glacier

National Park SSaass kka att cchheewwaann

Blackfeet Indian

Reservation
 

")232

Northwest

Glasgow

OHV area

40 acres 

£¤2

GLACIER 

£¤89

1:1,750,000 

0 25 

Miles 

Alternative E

(Preferred) 

Browning Cut Bank HILL TOOLE 

LIBERTY
 BLAINE
 

Shelby Chester Chinook 

£¤2 

Malta

Rocky Boy's

Indian Reservation Ft. Belknap

Indian Reservation 

Havre PHILLIPS
 

Fresno OHV area - 125 acres CHOUTEAU
 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is 

made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the 

accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for 

purposes not intended by the BLM. This map may not 

meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product 

was developed through digital means and information 

may be updated without notification. 

") £¤

£¤87 

66 

191 

Fort Benton 

CMR National

Wildlife Refuge 

See WSA maps for

Designated Roads 

Glasgow

VALLEY 

50
§ 1603.215 Record of hearings. ( a ) All hearings shall be audio or video recorded, stenographically reported, or both. All evidence relied upon by the administrative law judge for decision shall be contained in the transcript of testimony, either directly or by appropriate reference. All exhibits introduced as evidence shall be marked for identification, with a copy provided for all parties, if not previously provided, and incorporated into the record. Transcripts may be obtained by the parties from the official reporter at rates fixed by the contract with the reporter.
( b ) Corrections to the official transcript will be permitted upon motion only when errors of substance are involved and upon approval of the administrative law judge. Motions for correction must be submitted within 10 days of the receipt of the transcript unless additional time is permitted by the administrative law judge.
[62 FR 17543, Apr. 10, 1997, as amended at 89 FR 47853, June 4, 2024]
#### In re MICHAEL M. MADIGAN.1

July 21, 1896.

Nos. 10,130 — (321).

Accusation by Minnesota State Bar Association against Michael M. Madigan, an attorney at law of the state of Minnesota, in that he had been convicted of the crime of perjury.

Judgment of disbarment.

*E. H.*Osmwn, for Minnesota State Bar Association.

*A. O. Eolliff,*for Michael M. Madigan.

1

 Reported in 68 N. W. 1102.

PER CURIAM.

This matter having been submitted to this court upon the evidence, and the same having been carefully examined, from which it appears that the charge against him of having been convicted of felony has been conclusively proven by the record of such conviction, and all questions of law applicable thereto having been duly considered: Now, therefore, it is ordered and adjudged that said Michael M. Madigan be, and he is hereby, removed from his office as an attorney and counselor at law in the courts of this state, and that judgment be entered accordingly.
#### Pate *v.*Baker.

Assumpsit.

(Decided November 28, 1916.

73 South. 125.)

1. Bill of Exceptions; Presentation; Time. — A bill of exceptions not presented to the trial judge within 90 days from the date of the judgment cannot be looked to as a part of the record for the purpose of review.

2. Appeal and Error; Review; Bill of Exceptions. — Where the affirmative charge is given or refused, the action of the trial court cannot be reviewed in the absence of a bill of exceptions.

Appeal from Coosa Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. S. L. Brewer.

Assumpsit by D. W. Baker against J. C. Pate. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

John A. Darden, for appellant.

Riddle, Burt & Riddle, for appellee.

BROWN, J.

(1) The judgment in this case was rendered on the 6th day of December, 1915, and the indorsement of the *235trial judge on the bill of exceptions shows that it was not presented until the 7th day of March, 1916, more than 90 days from the day on which the judgment was rendered, and cannot be looked to as a part of the record for the purpose of reviewing the trial *court.*— Box, *et al. v. Southern Ry. Co.,*184 Ala. 598, 64 South. 69; *Harper v. State,*13 Ala. App. 47, 69 South. 302.

(2) The only matter assigned as error is the giving of the affirmative charge for appellee and the refusal of a like charge to appellant; and, as those are matters that cannot be reviewed in the absence of a bill of exceptions, the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Donald L. Paliwoda, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004 of Davel Communications, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: May 14, 2004

                                                 /s/ DONALD L. PALIWODA
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Donald L. Paliwoda
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
#### INDUST COMM v POLCEN

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21680.

Decided Dec. 4, 1929

Syllabus by

ALLEN. J.

EMPLOYER & EMPLOYE

(250 W3) Where the record shows that a claimant for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, working in the sulphuric department of a chemical company, was caused by the emission of sulphuric fumes into the plant of such chemical company to have a coughing spell, which resulted in a hernia, such hernia constitutes an injury compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

Marshall, C. J., Kinkade, Robinson, and Day, JJ., concur.
# EUR-Lex - 31999D0547 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999D0547

**1999/547/EC: Commission Decision of 14 July 1999 amending Decisions 94/432/EC and 94/433/EC laying down detailed for the application of Council Directives 93/23/EEC and 93/24/EEC on the statistical surveys to be carried out on pig and bovine animal livestock and production (notified under document number C(1999) 2080) **

*
Official Journal L 209 , 07/08/1999 P. 0033 - 0033 *

COMMISSION DECISION

of 14 July 1999

amending Decisions 94/432/EC and 94/433/EC laying down detailed for the application of Council Directives 93/23/EEC and 93/24/EEC on the statistical surveys to be carried out on pig and bovine animal livestock and production

(notified under document number C(1999) 2080)

(1999/547/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 93/23/EEC of 1 June 1993 on the statistical surveys to be carried out on pig production(1), as last amended by Directive 97/77/EC(2), and in particular Article 6(2) and (3),

Having regard to Council Directive 93/24/EEC of 1 June 1993, on the statistical survey to be carried out on bovine animal production(3), as last amended by Directive 97/77/EC, and in particular Article 1(2) and (3),

(1) Whereas, Commission Decisions 94/432/EC(4) and 94/433/EC(5), as modified by Decision 95/380/EC(6) and by Decision 99/47/EC(7) lay down detailed rules for the application of Council Directives 93/23/EEC and 93/24/EEC;

(2) Whereas the Member States may, at their request, be authorised to provide the breakdown at regional level for the final results of the April or May/June or August pig survey;

(3) Whereas, Member States whose bovine animal population is less than 1,5 million head may, at their request, be authorised to dispense altogether with one of the two surveys in May/June or November/December;

(4) Whereas Belgium and Greece have made applications for the type of authorisation mentioned above;

(5) Whereas the envisaged measures of this Decision are in line with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Agricultural Statistics set up by the Council Decision 72/279/EEC(8).

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 94/432/EC shall be amended as follows:

In Annex IV point (d) under the heading "May/June", the text "Belgium" shall be inserted.

Article 2

Decision 94/433/EC shall be amended as follows:

In Annex V point (b) under the heading "November/December", the text "Greece" shall be deleted, under the heading "May/June", the text "Greece" shall be inserted.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 July 1999.

For the Commission

Yves-Thibault DE SILGUY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 149, 21.6.1993, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 10, 16.1.1998, p. 28.

(3) OJ L 149, 21.6.1993, p. 5.

(4) OJ L 179, 13.7.1994, p. 22.

(5) OJ L 179, 13.7.1994, p. 27.

(6) OJ L 228, 23.9.1995, p. 25.

(7) OJ L 15, 20.1.1999, p. 10.

(8) OJ L 179, 7.8.1972, p. 1.