alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THIRD QUARTER 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ALTREX INCORPORATED.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       0
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                7,500
<OTHER-SE>                                             (7,500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                0
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        7,250
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (7,250)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (7,250)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (7,250)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.00




</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12428]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

STATE DEPARTMENT

[Public Notice #3279]


Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC) Meeting Notice; Closed 
Meeting

    The Department of State announces a meeting of the U.S. State 
Department--Overseas Security Advisory Council on June 28 and 29, at 
the Drake Hotel, Chicago, Illinois. Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act and 5 U.S.C. 552b[c] [1] and [4], it has 
been determined the meeting will be closed to the public. Matters 
relative to classified national security information as well as 
privileged commercial information will be discussed. The agenda will 
include updated committee reports, a world threat overview and a round 
table discussion that calls for the discussion of classified and 
corporate proprietary/security information as well as private sector 
physical and procedural security policies and protective programs at 
sensitive U.S. Government and private sector locations overseas.
    For more information contact Marsha Thurman, Overseas Security 
Advisory Council, Department of State, Washington, D.C. 20522-1003, 
phone: 202-663-0533.

    Dated: May 8, 2000.
Peter E. Bergin,
Director of the Diplomatic Security Service, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-12428 Filed 5-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-U
#### § 91.121 Altimeter settings.

(a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level of that aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when operating—

(1) Below 18,000 feet MSL, to—

(i) The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and within 100 nautical miles of the aircraft;

(ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate available station; or

(iii) In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure; or

(2) At or above 18,000 feet MSL, to 29.92′′ Hg.

(b) The lowest usable flight level is determined by the atmospheric pressure in the area of operation as shown in the following table:

| Current altimeter setting | Lowest usable flight level |
| --- | --- |
| 29.92 (or higher) | 180 |
| 29.91 through 29.42 | 185 |
| 29.41 through 28.92 | 190 |
| 28.91 through 28.42 | 195 |
| 28.41 through 27.92 | 200 |
| 27.91 through 27.42 | 205 |
| 27.41 through 26.92 | 210 |

(c) To convert minimum altitude prescribed under §§ 91.119 and 91.177 to the minimum flight level, the pilot shall take the flight level equivalent of the minimum altitude in feet and add the appropriate number of feet specified below, according to the current reported altimeter setting:

| Current altimeter setting | Adjustment factor |
| --- | --- |
| 29.92 (or higher) | None |
| 29.91 through 29.42 | 500 |
| 29.41 through 28.92 | 1,000 |
| 28.91 through 28.42 | 1,500 |
| 28.41 through 27.92 | 2,000 |
| 27.91 through 27.42 | 2,500 |
| 27.41 through 26.92 | 3,000 |
Specimen certificate of Series A Preferred Stock of REG Newco, Inc.



 Exhibit 4.2 
  
 

 
 REG Newco, Inc. 
 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK 
 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 
 THIS
CERTIFIES that 
 is the owner of 
 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.000 I PER SHARE OF 
 REG Newco, Inc. 
 transferable only on the books of
the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by the facsimile signatures of its duly
authorized officers and its Corporate seal to be hereunto affixed. 
 DATED: 
 SECRETARY 
 President 
 COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED 
 REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER COMPANY 
 TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 
 BY 
 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 
 M. BURR KEIM, PHILA. 
 LITHO. NO S.A 







 

 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
 TEN COM - as tenants in common 
 TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties 
 JT TEN - as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common 
 UNIF GIFT MIN ACT- Custodian 
 (Cuts) (Minor) 
 under Uniform Gifts to Minors

 Act 
 (State) 
 Additional abbreviations may also be used
though not in the above list. 
 For Value Received 
 do hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) 
 Shares of the Series A Preferred Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of
substitution in the premises. 
 Dated: 
 X 
 X 
 THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NPAE(S) AS WRITTEN UPON NOTICE:
THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT 
 OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.

 Signature(s) Guaranteed 
 By: 
 THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN
ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, Savings AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP INAN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Report of the Commissioner ofInternal Revenue on the operations of the Internal Revenue system for the yearending June 30**
 
1863 | 1864 | 1865 | 1866 | 1867 | 1868 | 1869
 
SuDoc Number:T 22.1:
Item Number:0955 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000934123
 
January 30, 2018
#### CUNNINGHAM v. THE STATE.

(Decided January 30, 1917.)

Appeal from Gadsden City Court.

Heard before Hon. James A. Bilbro.

No counsel marked for appellant.

W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 99.2



              Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                      of Title 18 of the United States Code


         I, L. Theodore Van Eerden, Chief Financial Officer of InterDent, Inc.,
certify that (i) the Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of InterDent, Inc.




                                  \s\ L. THEODORE VAN EERDEN
                                  L. Theodore Van Eerden
                                  Chief Financial Officer
§ 1910.427 Liveboating. ( a ) *General.* Employers engaged in diving operations involving liveboating shall comply with the following requirements.
( b ) *Limits.* Diving operations involving liveboating shall not be conducted: ( 1 ) With an inwater decompression time of greater than 120 minutes;
( 2 ) Using surface-supplied air at depths deeper than 190 fsw, except that dives with bottom times of 30 minutes or less may be conducted to depths of 220 fsw;
( 3 ) Using mixed gas at depths greater than 220 fsw;
( 4 ) In rough seas which significantly inpede diver mobility or work function; or
( 5 ) In other than daylight hours.
( c ) *Procedures.* ( 1 ) The propeller of the vessel shall be stopped before the diver enters or exits the water.
( 2 ) A device shall be used which minimizes the possibility of entanglement of the diver's hose in the propeller of the vessel.
( 3 ) Two-way voice communication between the designated person-in-charge and the person controlling the vessel shall be available while the diver is in the water.
( 4 ) A standby diver shall be available while a diver is in the water.
( 5 ) A diver-carried reserve breathing gas supply shall be carried by each diver engaged in liveboating operations.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice 00-048] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of prospective patent license. 

# SUMMARY:

NASA hereby gives notice that East3.com, LLC, of Richmond, VA, has applied for an exclusive license to practice the inventions described and claimed in U.S. Patent Number 5,377,100, entitled “A METHOD OF ENCOURAGING ATTENTION BY CORRELATING VIDEO GAME DIFFICULTY WITH ATTENTION LEVEL,” and NASA Case No. LAR 15817-1, entitled “A METHOD OF ENCOURAGING PHYSIOLOGICAL SELF-REGULATION THROUGH MODULATION OF AN OPERATOR'S CONTROL INPUT TO A VIDEO GAME OR TRAINING SIMULATOR,” both of which are assigned to the United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Written objections to the prospective grant of a license should be sent to Langley Research Center. 

# DATES:

Responses to this notice must be received by July 11, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Helen M. Galus, Patent Attorney, Langley Research Center, Mail Code 212, Hampton, VA 23681-2199; telephone 757-864-3227; facsimile 757-864-9190. 

Dated: May 1, 2000. 

Edward A. Frankle, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 00-11982 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00419

- CR

NATHAN ROSS RIEWE

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 2nd 25th District Court of Gonzales County , Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 120

- 20

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by
this Court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 25, 2024
#### Edward J. Lewis *v.*Smith and Gilbert.

(No. 9,945.)

Although a general denial of indebtedness may not be a denial of all the material allegations of a petition yet, it would be going too far to entirely disregard such an answer and require no proof from the plaintiff.

Special Term. — Submitted on petition and answer.

*435The petition sets forth a transaction in which it appears that there was a settlement by which the defendants became possessed of certain drafts for £600, and £355, 11s. and 8d., in which the plaintiff was interested to the extent of $1,170, that in the collection of said drafts, to the extent of plaintiff’s interest, the defendants acted as the agent of the plaintiff, that the first draft was collected by the defendants, in the amount of $2,869 60, and the second remains unpaid; that of the amount so collected the plaintiff is entitled to $613 38, according to a proportion stated in the petition. This amount, it is said, has been demanded and payment refused, and a judgment for the amount, with interest, is asked.

To the petition the defendants put in an answer, and “ deny that they are indebted to said plaintiff' in the, sum of $613 38, as stated in said petition upon the cause of action stated therein, or in any sum whatever.”

The case having been set for trial, was submitted upon the pleadings without evidence.

*Mills & Hoadly,*for plaintiff.

*Flamen*Ball, for defendants.

Gholson, J.

The plaintiff claims that the answer contains no denial of the allegations in the petition; that such allegations not being controverted, are to be regarded as admitted. Code, section 127.

The code requires that the answer shall contain “ a general or specific denial of each material allegation of the petition controverted by the defendant.” Code, sec. 92. Thereis clearly in this case no specific denial, but I am not satisfied that the answer may not be regarded as a general denial of all the material allegations in the petition. If it was the intention of the defendants, in the general form they have adopted, to deny the material allegations of the petition, and such intention may be inferred from any fair, construe*436tion of the pleading, it would not be doing substantial justice, to render a judgment without any evidence. We are required to give pleadings a fair and liberal construction to accomplish the purposes of justice. On the contrary, if the plaintiff feels any doubt as to whether the allegations of his petition, or any of them, are really denied by the answer, he can apply to have the answer made more definite and certain. This has been frequently done as to such an answer as the present. But I think it would be going too far entirely to disregard such an answer and require no proof from the plaintiff'.

The judgment for the plaintiff' will, therefore, be refused, but the case may be withdrawn, either with a view to a motion, or to the production of evidence upon another setting for trial.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and

Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors

so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 15-BG-295

IN RE: RICHARD A. JULIANO,

Petitioner.

Bar Registration No. 465761 BDN: 29-15

BEFORE: Glickman and Thompson, Associate Judges, and Reid, Senior Judge. 

ORDER

(FILED - April 2, 2015)

On consideration of Bar Counsel’s report regarding petitioner’s petition for

reinstatement wherein Bar Counsel informs the court that Mr. Juliano has

demonstrated that he is fit to resume the practice of law, and it appearing that

petitioner is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, see In re Juliano, 912 A.2d

553 (D.C. 2006), and it further appearing that Mr. Juliano has been reinstated by the

state of Illinois, it is

ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for reinstatement is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Richard A. Juliano is hereby reinstated to the Bar

of the District of Columbia. 

PER CURIAM
#### § 1611.15 Exemption—EEOC Personnel Security Files.

EEOC's system of records entitled EEOC Personnel Security Files contains records that document and support decisions regarding suitability, eligibility and fitness for service of applicants for EEOC employment and contract positions. The records include background investigation records. Pursuant to section (k)(5) of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), this system of records is exempt from the provisions of sections (c)(3) and (d)(1) of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and (d)(1), but only to the extent that the accounting of disclosures or the disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of a source who furnished information to the government under an express promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence.

[74 FR 6832, Feb. 11, 2009]
#### § 1902.53 Publication of decisions.

All decisions on the reconsideration of an affirmative 18(e) determination shall be published in the Federal Register.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00646-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.A.V., P.A.V., A.J.V., L.V., and J.G., Children

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-PA-00244

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial 

court is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED March 17, 2020.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland Bancshares, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, James C. Clinard, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Martha J. Kelley, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
our knowledge:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:                        James C. Clinard
                           ----------------
                           James C. Clinard
                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                             August 14, 2003

                           /s/ Martha J. Kelley
                           --------------------
                           Martha J. Kelley
                           Chief Financial Officer
                             August 14, 2003
p.1 

OAR Box 1787 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

66) ll-C-24 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 11/4/200810:22:19 AM Sheet 66 of 147 
P.2 

*• i UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460 

NOV 1 8 1993 

OFFICE OF 

AIR ANO RAOIATION 

*.H<& 

71 

Robert E. Gilbert 

James River Corporation 

Corporate Environmental Services-West 

904 N.W. Drake Street 

Camas, WA 98607-1999 

Darius S. Rogers 

James River Corporation 

Communication Papers/Wauna Mill 

Rt. 2 Box 2185 

Clatskanie, OR 97016 

Dear Msrs. Gilbert and Rogers, 

On behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency's New Source Review 

Workgroup members, I am writing to thank you for meeting with us on 

September 29, 1993. We greatly appreciate the time you took to answer our 

questions and to assist us in understanding some of the aspects of your air 

permit and facility operations. 

As we explained to you, our efforts are due to New Source Review Reform 

efforts of the Agency. An.NSR Reform meeting with industry representatives, 

States, environmental representatives, and other federal agencies was 

scheduled for November 8 and 9. The meeting was held and the materials 

handed out for discussion are available in the public docket as will be 

documents prepared coming out of the meeting. We will, however, be sending 

you the materials for this meeting as a courtesy in appreciation for the 

courtesy you extended to us. 

The next meeting of this group may be scheduled for two days in the 

week of January 17, 1994. Materials for that meeting will also be available 

in the public docket and on the Office of Air Quality Planning and 

Standards' Technology Transfer Network (OAQPS' TTN). 

If you have any questions regarding these meetings, the materials, or 

the NSR Reform efforts you may call me at (703) 308-8709 or Larry Elmore at 

(919) 541-5433. Larry will be sending you the copies of the materials from 

the November 8 and 9 meeting. 

Sincerely, 

rJxt-tlj 

Clara Poffenberger, 

Stationary Source Compliance Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

cc: Larry Elmore, OAQPS 

Bill Lamason, OAQPS 

Bill Tyndall, OPAR 

Mark Kataoka, OGC 

(J_y Recycled/Recyclable 

f\ 7\ Pt1nt»«J wtth Soy/Canola Ink on paper that 

\r—i^-* '- ' •'—-••t- —"•• —