alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 93.303 Definitions. For the purposes of this subpart: *Allocation* means authorization to conduct a commercial air tour in the Grand Canyon National Park (GCNP) Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA).
*Commercial air tour* means any flight conducted for compensation or hire in a powered aircraft where a purpose of the flight is sightseeing. If the operator of a flight asserts that the flight is not a commercial air tour, factors that can be considered by the Administrator in making a determination of whether the flight is a commercial air tour include, but are not limited to— ( 1 ) Whether there was a holding out to the public of willingness to conduct a sightseeing flight for compensation or hire;
( 2 ) Whether a narrative was provided that referred to areas or points of interest on the surface;
( 3 ) The area of operation;
( 4 ) The frequency of flights;
( 5 ) The route of flight;
( 6 ) The inclusion of sightseeing flights as part of any travel arrangement package; or
( 7 ) Whether the flight in question would or would not have been canceled based on poor visibility of the surface.
*Commercial Special Flight Rules Area Operation* means any portion of any flight within the Grand Canyon National Park Special Flight Rules Area that is conducted by a certificate holder that has operations specifications authorizing flights within the Grand Canyon National Park Special Flight Rules Area. This term does not include operations conducted under an FAA Form 7711-1, Certificate of Waiver or Authorization. For more information on commercial special flight rules area operations, *see* “Grand Canyon National Park Special Flight Rules Area (GCNP SFRA) Procedures Manual,” which is available online or from the responsible Flight Standards Office.
*GCNP quiet aircraft technology designation* means an aircraft that is subject to § 93.301 and has been shown to comply with the noise limit specified in appendix A of this part.
*Number of passenger seats* means the number of passenger seats for which an individual aircraft is configured.
*Park* means Grand Canyon National Park.
*Special Flight Rules Area* means the Grand Canyon National Park Special Flight Rules Area.
[65 FR 17732, Apr. 4, 2000, as amended at 70 FR 16092, Mar. 29, 2005; Amdt. 93-102, 83 FR 48212, Sept. 24, 2018]
#### § 1471.720 How may I contest a suspension?

If you as a respondent wish to contest a suspension, you or your representative must provide the suspending official with information in opposition to the suspension. You may do this orally or in writing, but any information provided orally that you consider important must also be submitted in writing for the official record.
§ 1612.2 Definitions. The following definitions apply for purposes of this part: ( a ) The term *agency* means the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and any subdivision thereof authorized to act on its behalf.
( b ) The term *meeting* means the deliberations of at least three of the members of the agency, which is a quorum of Commissioners, where such deliberations determine or result in the joint conduct or disposition of official agency business (including conference calls), but does not include: ( 1 ) Individual members' consideration of official agency business circulated to the members in writing for disposition by notation or other separate, sequential consideration of Commission business by Commissioners,
( 2 ) Deliberations to decide whether a meeting or portion(s) of a meeting or series of meetings should be open or closed.
( 3 ) Deliberations to decide whether to withhold from disclosure information pertaining to a meeting or portions of a meeting or a series of meetings, or
( 4 ) Deliberations pertaining to any change in any meeting or to changes in the public announcement of such meeting.
( c ) The term *member* means each Commissioner of the agency.
( d ) The term *entire membership* means the number of members holding office at the time of the meeting in question.
( e ) The term *person* means any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or public or private organization.
( f ) The term *public observation* means attendance at any meeting open to the public but does not include participation, or attempted participation, in such meeting in any manner.
#### § 1471.360 What happens if I fail to disclose the information required under § 1471.355?

If we later determine that you failed to tell the person at the higher tier that you were excluded or disqualified at the time you entered into the covered transaction with that person, we may pursue any available remedies, including suspension and debarment.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-6606-1]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is issuing a request for proposals that will assist the Chesapeake Bay Program in meeting its goals and commitments. Approximately $2 million is available through the RFP. Subjects addressed in the RFP include air quality, nutrients, sediments, best management practices, chemical contaminants, communication, exotic species, fish, habitat restoration, oysters, student engagement, submerged aquatic vegetation, water quality, local government and community engagement, and sound land use. Functional categories that proposals should fall under include implementation and technical assistance; workshops, seminars, and training; monitoring and assessment; research and analysis; and education and outreach. Applicants must be a non-profit organization, local government, state agency, interstate agency, college, or university institution. Funding will be provided to an organization under the authority of the Clean Water Act, section 117. 

                        The RFP is available starting May 5, 2000 at the following web-site:                         *http://www.epa.edu/​r3chespk/​*                         You may request a paper copy by calling Carol Cochran at 215-815-2986 or by e-mail                         *cochran.carol@epa.gov*                         or by calling Lori Mackey at 410-267-5715 or e-mail at                         *mackey.lori@epa.gov.*                         All proposals must be received by the Chesapeake Bay Program Office by close of business June 9, 2000. Any late, incomplete, or faxed proposals will not be considered.                     

Peter J. Marx, 

Acting Director, Chesapeake Bay Program. 

[FR Doc. 00-12000  Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

FVP OPPORTUNITY FUND III, LP, FVP INVESTMENTS LLC, and

FVP SERVICING, LLC,

Appellants,

v.

KENNETH J. GOODMAN, as trustee of the DCG 2008 IRREVOCABLE

WEALTH TRUST, and INTERFACE PROPERTIES, LLC,

Appellees.

No. 4D2023-3057

[May 23, 2024]

Appeal of nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jack B. Tuter, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 

CACE22-005125.

Jerrell A. Breslin and Jonathan Noah Schwartz of Schwartz | Breslin, 

PLLC, Miami, and Bradford Cohen and Michael James McMullen of Cohen 

& McMullen, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Ivan Jac Reich and Terry Resk of Nason, Yeager, Gerson, Harris & 

Fumero, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, LEVINE and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TEIAS PEATENLANE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-682

[July 28, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael Usan, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 12-10182CF10A.

Robert David Malove of The Law Office of Robert David Malove, P.A., 

Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 
 RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arcadia Resources, Inc. (the registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [omitted in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Dated: August 15, 2005
    
    /s/ Rebecca R. IrishRebecca R. IrishChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial andAccounting Officer) and Secretary
 27
COMPANY SANITIZED PUBLIC COPY OCTOBER 30, 2009 

# Appendix F Company Annual Report – Summary of Reductions in Emissions and Product Content

Company Sanitized Public CopyCOMPANY SANITIZED PUBLIC COPY OCTOBER 30, 2009

SECTION 1: REPORT DATE October 30 , 20 09 SECTION 2: COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Company Name E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company 2a Street Address 1007 Market Street, Wilmington DE USA 19808 SECTION 3 : SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS Company Sanitized Public Copy Reporting Period (use calendar year - e.g. Jan 1, 2005 to Dec 31, 2005) January 1, 2008

– December 31, 200 8 Releases to all environmental media from fluoropolymer and telomer manufacture Operations Chemical category kgs 1 mers fluoropoly of kgs category of kgs telomers

of kgs category of kgs % Reduction of

total kgs released from baseline year PFOA and PFOA salt s 686 9 9 % Higher homologues 3 a U . S . facilities Precursors [ CBI ] [ CBI ] PFOA and PFOA salts 779 96% Higher homologues 3b Non-U . S . facilities Precursors Please provide information on the methods, assumptions, uncertainties and detecti on limits for the data provided above. 3c Methods, assumptions, etc. provided in business/site specific formsCOMPANY SANITIZED PUBLIC COPY OCTOBER 30, 2009

Product Content information is not summarized – see the individual Appendix D reports SECTION 4 : SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CONTENT Reporting Period (use calendar year - e.g. Jan 1, 2005 to Dec 31, 2005) January 1, 2008

– December 31, 2008 Product type Fluoropolymer dispersions Other fluoropolymers 1 Telomer based products 4a Production volume (kgs/year) 2 Concentration 3 % Reduction from baseline year Operations Chemical category Fluoropolymer dispersions 4 (ppm wetweight) Other

fluoropolymers 1, 5 (ppb dry weight) Telomer based

products6 (ppb dry weight ) Fluoropolymer

dispersions Other

fluoropolymers 1 Telomer

based products PFOA, PFOA salts and higher homologues 4b U.S. facilities Precursors

PFOA, PFOA salts and higher homologues 4c Non -U.S. facilities Precursors Please provide information on the methods, assumptions, uncertainties and detection li mits for the data provided above. 4d

1 Fluoropolymers manufactured with PFOA. 2 Use the following ranges: (1) Zero (2) > 0

– 10 kgs; (3) > 10 kgs

– 100 kgs ; ( 4 ) > 10 0 kgs

– 1,000 kgs; (5) > 1,000 kgs

– 10,000 kgs; (6) > 10,000 kgs

– 100,000 kgs ; (7) > 100,000 kgs

– 1,000,000 kgs; (8) Over 1,000,000 kgs. 3 Concentration should reflect the concentration of chemical in the product as sold by the reporting company. If the reporting company has information concerning the concentration of chemical in the product as used by others

– for example, as incorporated by dilution into a formulation

– that additional information would also be helpful. 4 This value should be expressed as a weighted average concentration and range. 5 This value should be expresse d as a maximum concentration. 6 This value should be expressed as a simple (not weighted) average and range.
Exhibit 32



FORM OF SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greens Worldwide Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Connie S. Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









/s/Connie S. Ross



Connie S. Ross

Chief Executive Officer

August 8, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.









---

Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greens Worldwide Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Margaret M. Eardley, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









/s/ Margaret M. Eardley

Margaret M. Eardley

Acting Chief Financial Officer

August 8, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SCWC-14-0001298 

________________________________________________________________ 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-14-0001298 

02-DEC-2016 

12:37 PM 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII 

PATRICIA E. BREAULT OLIVEIRA, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
 

 

vs.
 

DARRYL J. OLIVEIRA, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS 

(CAAP-14-0001298; FC-D NO. 09-1-000044) 

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Darryl J. Oliveira’s 

application for writ of certiorari filed on October 19, 2016, is 

hereby rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 2, 2016. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
[No. 20237-2-III.

Division Three.

December 26, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jose Manual Acevedo, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Walla Walla County, No. 01-1-00078-8, Robert L. Zagelow, J., entered May 29, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, J., concurred in by Schultheis and Kurtz, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart Z of Part 1910

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1910 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

#### § 1910.1009 beta-Naphthylamine.

See § 1910.1003, *13 carcinogens.*

[61 FR 9245, Mar. 7, 1996]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50347 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. NABOR RODRIGUEZ-DE LEON Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court For The Western District of Texas, El Paso USDC No. 3:06-CR-2234-ALL

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLE MENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * This is an appeal raisi ng the sole question whether appellant’s illegal reentry sentence was improperly enhanced by the court’s deeming his prior Colorado drug possession conviction “a crime of violence”. According to the Bureau of Prisons website, appellant is scheduled to complete his term of imprisonment on January 21, 2008. Because his release is imminent or has United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D January 30, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-50347

2 occurred, this court cannot usefully grant the only relief to which appellant would have been entitled: re-sentencing. Because noeffectivejudicial remedy exists, we must DISMISS this appeal as MOOT. DISMISSED.
§ 1614.602 Reports to the Commission. ( a ) Each agency shall report to the Commission information concerning pre-complaint counseling and the status, processing and disposition of complaints under this part at such times and in such manner as the Commission prescribes.
( b ) Each agency shall advise the Commission whenever it is served with a Federal court complaint based upon a complaint that is pending on appeal at the Commission.
( c ) Each agency shall submit annually for the review and approval of the Commission written national and regional equal employment opportunity plans of action. Plans shall be submitted in a format prescribed by the Commission and shall include, but not be limited to: ( 1 ) Provision for the establishment of training and education programs designed to provide maximum opportunity for employees to advance so as to perform at their highest potential;
( 2 ) Description of the qualifications, in terms of training and experience relating to equal employment opportunity, of the principal and operating officials concerned with administration of the agency's equal employment opportunity program; and
( 3 ) Description of the allocation of personnel and resources proposed by the agency to carry out its equal employment opportunity program.
§ 1603.203 Unavailability or withdrawal of administrative law judges. ( a ) In the event the administrative law judge designated to conduct the hearing becomes unavailable or withdraws from the adjudication, another administrative law judge may be designated for the purpose of further hearing or issuing a decision on the record as made, or both. At any time administrative law judges deem themselves disqualified, they may withdraw from an adjudication.
( b ) Prior to issuance of a decision on the complaint, any party may move that the administrative law judge withdraw on the grounds of personal bias or other disqualification by filing with the administrative law judge an affidavit setting forth in detail the matters alleged to constitute grounds for withdrawal promptly upon discovery of the alleged facts. The administrative law judge shall rule upon the motion for withdrawal. If the administrative law judge concludes that the motion was filed promptly and has merit, the administrative law judge shall immediately withdraw from the adjudication. If the administrative law judge does not withdraw, the adjudication shall proceed.
[89 FR 47852, June 4, 2024]
[No. 27357-8-II.

Division Two.

October 25, 2002.]

#### Jo Anne Bock, et al., *Appellants,*v. William D. Watson, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 00-2-06230-9, Kitty-Ann van Doorninck, J., entered May 4, 2001. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Hunt, C.J., and Bridgewater, J.