Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules 55673 

(d) Change regarding specific 

limitations to providing pro bono legal 

services under § 1003.63; 

(e) Receipt of an order of disbarment 

under § 1003.101(a)(1) or suspension 

under § 1003.101(a)(2) by the provider 

(if an attorney), or by an attorney or 

representative providing pro bono 

services before EOIR on behalf of the 

provider; or 

(f) Change in professional status, 

including bar membership or any order 

suspending, enjoining, restraining, 

disbarring, or otherwise restricting the 

provider (if an attorney), or an attorney 

or representative providing pro bono 

services before EOIR on behalf of the 

provider, in the practice of law. 

PART 1240—PROCEEDINGS TO 

DETERMINE REMOVABILITY OF 

ALIENS IN THE UNITED STATES 

■ 10. The authority citation for part 

1240 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1103, 1182, 1186a, 

1224, 1225, 1226, 1227, 1251, 1252 note, 

1252a, 1252b, 1362; secs. 202 and 203, Pub. 

L. 105–100 (111 Stat. 2160, 2193); sec. 902, 

Pub. L. 105–277, (112 Stat. 2681). 

■ 11. In § 1240.10, revise paragraphs 

(a)(2) and (a)(3), to read as follows: 

§ 1240.10 Hearing. 

(a) * * * 

(2) Advise the respondent of the 

availability of pro bono legal services for 

the immigration court location at which 

the hearing will take place, and 

ascertain that the respondent has 

received a list of such pro bono legal 

service providers. 

(3) Ascertain that the respondent has 

received a copy of appeal rights. 

* * * * * 

§ 1240.32 [Amended] 

■ 12. Amend § 1240.32 in paragraph (a) 

by removing the words ‘‘Government, 

and of the availability of free legal 

services programs qualified under 8 CFR 

part 1003 and organizations recognized 

pursuant to § 1292.2 of this chapter 

located in the district where his or her 

exclusion hearing is to be held; and 

shall ascertain that the applicant has 

received a list of such programs’’ and 

adding, in their place, the words 

‘‘Government; advise him or her of the 

availability of pro bono legal services for 

the immigration court location at which 

the hearing will take place, and 

ascertain that he or she has received a 

list of such pro bono legal service 

providers’’. 

§ 1240.48 [Amended] 

■ 13. Amend § 1240.48 in paragraph (a) 

by removing the words ‘‘free legal 

services programs qualified under 8 CFR 

part 1003 and organizations recognized 

pursuant to § 1292.2 of this chapter, 

located in the district where the 

deportation hearing is being held; 

ascertain that the respondent has 

received a list of such programs’’ and 

adding, in their place, the words ‘‘pro 

bono legal services for the immigration 

court location at which the hearing will 

take place; ascertain that the respondent 

has received a list of such pro bono legal 

service providers’’. 

PART 1241—APPREHENSION AND 

DETENTION OF ALIENS ORDERED 

REMOVED 

■ 14. The authority citation for part 

1241 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a; 8 U.S.C. 

1103, 1182, 1223, 1224, 1225, 1226, 1227, 

1231, 1251, 1253, 1255, 1330, 1362; 18 U.S.C. 

4002, 4013(c)(4). 

§ 1241.14 [Amended] 

■ 15. Amend § 1241.14 in paragraph 

(g)(3)(i) by removing the words ‘‘a list of 

free legal service providers,’’ and 

adding, in their place, the words ‘‘the 

List of Pro Bono Legal Service Providers 

for the immigration court at which the 

hearing is being held’’. 

Dated: August 4, 2014. 

Eric H. Holder, Jr., 

Attorney General. 

[FR Doc. 2014–21686 Filed 9–16–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–30–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0625; Directorate 

Identifier 2014–NM–044–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, 

Inc. Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2A12 

(CL–601), and CL–600–2B16 (CL–601– 

3A, CL–601–3R, and CL–604 Variants) 

airplanes. This proposed AD was 

prompted by a report of an aft 

equipment bay fire due to chafing and 

subsequent arcing of the integrated 

drive generator (IDG) power cables. 

Additionally, we have received several 

reports of broken support brackets of the 

hydraulic lines. This proposed AD 

would require a one-time inspection of 

the IDG power cables for chafing, and 

for any cracked or broken support 

bracket of the hydraulic line; and 

corrective actions if necessary. We are 

proposing this AD to detect and correct 

broken support brackets of the hydraulic 

lines, which could result in inadequate 

clearance between the IDG power cables 

and hydraulic lines and chafing of the 

IDG power cables, and consequent high 

energy arcing and an uncontrolled fire 

in the aft equipment bay. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by November 3, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Bombardier, 

Inc., 400 Coˆte Vertu Road West, Dorval, 

Que ́bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 

514–855–5000; fax 514 855–7401; email 

thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet 

http://www.bombardier.com. You may 

view this referenced service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, WA. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, 

call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0625; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Operations 

office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in 

the ADDRESSES section. Comments will 

be available in the AD docket shortly 

after receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Assata Dessaline, Aerospace Engineer, 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
55674 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

Avionics and Service Branch, ANE–172, 

FAA, New York Aircraft Certification 

Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, 

Westbury, New York 11590; telephone 

(516) 228–7301; fax (516) 794–5531. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0625; Directorate Identifier 

2014–NM–044–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD based on those comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

Transport Canada Civil Aviation 

(TCCA), which is the aviation authority 

for Canada, has issued Canadian 

Airworthiness Directive CF–2014–05, 

dated January 20, 2014 (referred to after 

this as the Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the 

MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition 

for the specified products. The MCAI 

states: 

There has been one reported case on the 

CL–600–2B19 aeroplane of an aft equipment 

bay fire occurring due to arcing of chafed 

integrated drive generator (IDG) power 

cables. Additionally, the hydraulic line 

support brackets located at the fuselage 

station (FS) 672 and FS 682 on a CL–600– 

2B19 aeroplane could result in inadequate 

clearance between the IDG power cables and 

hydraulic lines, potentially resulting in 

chafing of the IDG power cables. Chafed IDG 

power cables can generate high energy 

arcing, which can result in an uncontrolled 

fire in the aft equipment bay. 

It was found that a similar configuration 

exists on models CL–600–2A12 and CL–600– 

2B16 aeroplanes. Therefore, a similar unsafe 

condition exists. 

This [Canadian] AD mandates the detailed 

visual inspection and, if required, 

rectification of the IDG power cables and 

hydraulic line support bracket. 

Required corrective actions include 

repair or replacement of the IDG power 

cable if any chafing is found, and 

replacement of any cracked or broken 

support bracket. You may examine the 

MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet 

at http://www.regulations.gov by 

searching for and locating it in Docket 

No. FAA–2014–0625. 

Relevant Service Information 

Bombardier has issued the following 

service information: 

(1) Bombardier Service Bulletin 605– 

24–007, Revision 01, dated January 13, 

2014 (for Model CL–600–2B16 

airplanes); 

(2) Bombardier Service Bulletin 604– 

24–026, Revision 01, dated January 13, 

2014 (for Model CL–600–2B16 

airplanes); and 

(3) Bombardier Service Bulletin 604– 

0625, Revision 01, dated January 13, 

2014 (for Model Cl-600–2A12 and CL– 

600–2B16 airplanes). 

The actions described in this service 

information are intended to correct the 

unsafe condition identified in the 

MCAI. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of This Proposed AD 

This product has been approved by 

the aviation authority of another 

country, and is approved for operation 

in the United States. Pursuant to our 

bilateral agreement with the State of 

Design Authority, we have been notified 

of the unsafe condition described in the 

MCAI and service information 

referenced above. We are proposing this 

AD because we evaluated all pertinent 

information and determined an unsafe 

condition exists and is likely to exist or 

develop on other products of the same 

type design. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

affects 95 airplanes of U.S. registry. 

We also estimate that it would take 

about 1 work-hour per product to 

comply with the basic requirements of 

this proposed AD. The average labor 

rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on 

these figures, we estimate the cost of 

this proposed AD on U.S. operators to 

be $8,075, or $85 per product. 

We have received no definitive data 

that would enable us to provide cost 

estimates for the on-condition repair of 

chafed power cables or cracked or 

broken support brackets, as specified in 

this AD. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 

3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in 

Alaska; and 

4. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. Amend § 39.13 by adding the 

following new airworthiness directive 

(AD): 

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0625; Directorate Identifier 2014–NM– 

044–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by November 

3, 2014. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules 55675 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. 

airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1), 

(c)(2), and (c)(3) of this AD, certificated in 

any category. 

(1) Model CL–600–2A12 (CL–601) 

airplanes, serial numbers 3001 through 3066 

inclusive. 

(2) Model CL–600–2B16 (CL–601–3A, CL– 

601–3R Variants) airplanes, serial numbers 

5001 through 5194 inclusive. 

(3) Model CL–600–2B16 (CL–604 Variant) 

airplanes, serial numbers 5301 through 5665 

inclusive, and 5701 through 5934 inclusive. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 24, Electrical Power. 

(e) Reason 

This AD was prompted by a report of an 

aft equipment bay fire due to chafing and 

subsequent arcing of the integrated drive 

generator (IDG) power cables. Additionally, 

we have received several reports of broken 

support brackets of the hydraulic lines. We 

are issuing this AD to detect and correct 

broken support brackets of the hydraulic 

lines, which could result in inadequate 

clearance between the IDG power cables and 

hydraulic lines and chafing of the IDG power 

cables, and consequent high energy arcing 

and an uncontrolled fire in the aft equipment 

bay. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) One-Time Inspection and Corrective 

Actions 

Within 400 flight hours or 18 months after 

the effective date of this AD, whichever 

occurs first: Perform a one-time detailed 

inspection of the IDG power cables for 

chafing between the cables and the adjacent 

hydraulic and pneumatic lines, and for any 

cracked or broken support bracket of the 

hydraulic lines, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of the 

applicable service information identified in 

paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD. 

If any chafing of the power cables or any 

cracked or broken support bracket is found, 

before further flight, repair or replace, as 

applicable, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of the 

applicable service information identified in 

paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD. 

(1) Bombardier Service Bulletin 605–24– 

007, Revision 01, dated January 13, 2014 (for 

Model CL–600–2B16 airplanes). 

(2) Bombardier Service Bulletin 604–24– 

026, Revision 01, dated January 13, 2014 (for 

Model CL–600–2B16 airplanes). 

(3) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601–0625, 

Revision 01, dated January 13, 2014 (for 

Model Cl-600–2A12 and CL–600–2B16 

airplanes). 

(h) Credit for Previous Actions 

This paragraph provides credit for action 

required by paragraph (g) of this AD, if the 

action was performed before the effective 

date of this AD using Bombardier Service 

Bulletin 605–24–007, 604–24–026, or 601– 

0625, all dated September 18, 2012, provided 

that the action specified in Service Request 

for Product Support Action (SRPSA) 27512, 

SRPSA 30806, SRPSA 32727, SRPSA 32864, 

or SRPSA 33161 has not been done. 

Bombardier Service Bulletins 605–24–007, 

604–24–026, and 601–0625, all dated 

September 18, 2012, are not incorporated by 

reference in this AD. 

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA, 

has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 

AD, if requested using the procedures found 

in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 

39.19, send your request to your principal 

inspector or local Flight Standards District 

Office, as appropriate. If sending information 

directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: 

Program Manager, Continuing Operational 

Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart 

Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; 

telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–794–5531. 

Before using any approved AMOC, notify 

your appropriate principal inspector, or 

lacking a principal inspector, the manager of 

the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. The AMOC 

approval letter must specifically reference 

this AD. 

(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any 

requirement in this AD to obtain corrective 

actions from a manufacturer, the action must 

be accomplished using a method approved 

by the Manager, International Branch, ANM– 

116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or 

Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), or 

Bombardier, Inc.’s TCCA Design Approval 

Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, 

the approval must include the DAOauthorized signature. 

(j) Related Information 

(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian 

Airworthiness Directive CF–2014–05, dated 

January 20, 2014, for related information. 

This MCAI may be found in the AD docket 

on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov 

by searching for and locating it in Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0625. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 Coˆte 

Vertu Road West, Dorval, Que ́bec H4S 1Y9, 

Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514– 

855–7401; email thd.crj@

aero.bombardier.com; Internet http://

www.bombardier.com. You may view this 

service information at the FAA, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, WA. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, call 

425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

September 9, 2014. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–22151 Filed 9–16–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0627; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NM–217–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed 

Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin 

Aeronautics Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede 

Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2011–09– 

03, which applies to all Lockheed 

Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin 

Aeronautics Company Model 382, 382B, 

382E, 382F, and 382G airplanes. AD 

2011–09–03 currently requires 

repetitive eddy current inspections to 

detect cracks in the center wing upper 

and lower rainbow fittings, and 

corrective actions if necessary; and 

repetitive replacement of rainbow 

fittings, which would extend the 

repetitive interval for the next 

inspection. Since we issued AD 2011– 

09–03, analysis of in-service cracking 

has shown that a reduction in the 

inspection intervals is necessary for the 

upper rainbow fittings. This proposed 

AD is intended to complete certain 

mandated programs intended to support 

the airplane reaching its limit of validity 

(LOV) of the engineering data that 

support the established structural 

maintenance program. This proposed 

AD would require reduced intervals for 

inspections of the upper rainbow 

fittings. We are proposing this AD to 

detect and correct fatigue cracking of the 

upper and lower rainbow fittings on the 

center wings, which could grow large 

and lead to the failure of the fitting and 

a catastrophic failure of the center wing. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by November 3, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS