alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1918.101 Eye and face protection. ( a ) The employer shall ensure that: ( 1 ) ( i ) Employers must ensure that each employee uses appropriate eye and/or face protection when the employee is exposed to an eye or face hazards, and that protective eye and face devices comply with any of the following consensus standards: ( A ) ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2010, Occupational and Educational Personal Eye and Face Protection Devices, incorporated by reference in § 1918.3;
( B ) ANSI Z87.1-2003, Occupational and Educational Personal Eye and Face Protection Devices, incorporated by reference in § 1918.3; or
( C ) ANSI Z87.1-1989 (R-1998), Practice for Occupational and Educational Eye and Face Protection, incorporated by reference in § 1918.3
( ii ) Protective eye and face protection devices that the employer demonstrates are at least as effective as protective eye and face protection devices that are constructed in accordance with one of the above consensus standards will be deemed to be in compliance with the requirements of this section.
( 2 ) For an employee wearing corrective glasses, eye protection equipment required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be of the type that can be worn over glasses. Prescription-ground safety lenses may be substituted if they provide equivalent protection.
( b ) Eye protection shall be maintained in good condition.
( c ) Used eye protection shall be cleaned and disinfected before issuance to another employee.
[62 FR 40202, July 25, 1997, as amended at 74 FR 46361, Sept. 9, 2009; 81 FR 16092, Mar. 25, 2016]
§ 1922.4 Responsibilities of the Board; voting. ( a ) *Determinations and recommendations.* To the extent possible, the Board shall determine the facts, conditions, and circumstances relating to any injury or condition which is the subject of investigation, the probable cause thereof, and shall recommend measures which will provide the best means of preventing future injuries or conditions of similar character. The determinations and recommendations shall be made after hearing such witnesses and receiving such documents and other data relating to the subject or subjects of investigation as may be found available as a result of preliminary investigation.
( b ) *Report.* Upon completion of the investigational hearing, the Board shall file a report of its investigation with the Assistant Secretary. The report shall contain the determinations and recommendations required under paragraph (a) of this section. Any member may file a separate report in order to express determinations, recommendations, or reasons for determinations or recommendations which differ from those of a majority of the Board.
( c ) *Voting.* Actions of the Board, including the determinations and recommendations required under paragraph (a) of this section, shall require a vote of a majority of its members.
#### Maribel Carrasco, Respondent, v Frank Monteforte, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 326]

—In an action to recover damages for *331personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated December 15, 1998, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

On July 8, 1997, in the middle of the afternoon, the injured plaintiff was attempting to cross Mill Road, in Freeport, Nassau County. The eastbound right lane of the road was crowded with traffic waiting at a red traffic light. The left lane was less crowded, and, the defendant, who was in that lane, driving no more than 20 miles per hour, was moving forward toward the red light. The plaintiff crossed in front of a van which was stopped in the right lane and stepped into the left lane coming into contact with the front portion of the passenger side of the defendant’s car. The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for her injuries, claiming that the defendant’s negligence caused the accident.

In support of his motion for summary judgment the defendant submitted his deposition testimony and that of the plaintiff and the driver of the van in front of which the plaintiff walked immediately before the accident. The plaintiff could not recall the part of the defendant’s car with which she came into contact. However, the van driver and the defendant agreed that the front of the defendant’s car had already passed the plaintiff when she walked into the passenger side of the car somewhere between the wheel and the sideview mirror. It was undisputed that the accident occurred suddenly and without warning. In presenting this evidence, the defendant sustained his burden of proving his entitlement to summary judgment as a matter of law (CPLR 3212 [b]; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562; *Brown v City of New York,*237 AD2d 398). The plaintiffs submissions failed to raise any issue of fact which precluded the court from granting summary judgment to the defendant. Bracken, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.
§ 1410.11 Standards of review. Upon a request for inspection of records or a determination on a request for amendment, the Director of Administration, his designated representative, or the Deputy National Director will review the pertinent records and discard any material in them that is not: ( a ) Relevant and necessary to accomplish a statutory purpose or a purpose not authorized by executive order.
( b ) Accurate, relevant, timely, and complete, to assure fairness to the individual.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marvin Walls, Appellant.

[696 NYS2d 820]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki Scherer, J.), rendered November 19, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur— Ellerin, P. J., Williams, Wallach, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1198]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

[Document Identifier: HCFA-R-296]


Agency Information Collection Activities

ACTION:  Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  In the Federal Register issue of Monday, January 3, 2000, 
make the following correction:
    Correction: In the Federal Register issue of Monday, January 3, 
2000, Volume 65, Number 1; DOCID:fr03ja00-47, on page 136, the last 
sentence of the first paragraph under ``Use'', the phrase in 
parenthesis ``(they are attached as Exhibits 1-3 hereto)'' needs to be 
deleted. Also on page 136, in the second sentence of the second 
paragraph under ``Use'', the word ``attached'' needs to be deleted, and 
in the first sentence of the paragraph under ``Home Health Advance 
Beneficiary Notices'', the words ``Exhibits 1-3'' need to be deleted. 
The HHABNs are not attached to the Federal Register notice but can be 
obtained by accessing HCFA's web site address at (note correction to 
address) http://www.hcfa.gov/regs/prdact95.htm, or E-mail your request, 
including your address, phone number, OMB number, and HCFA document 
identifier, to Paperwork @hcfa.gov, or call the Reports Clearance 
Office on (410) 786-1326.

    Dated: January 7, 2000.
John Parmigiani,
Manager, HCFA Office of Information Services, Security and Standards 
Group, Division of HCFA Enterprise Standards.
[FR Doc. 00-1198 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-03-P
# Federal Aviation

Administration



# Memorandum

Date: January 19, 2017

To: Docket FAA

- 2014

- 0504

From: Sheri Pippin, Air Transportation Division

Subject: Pilot Professional Development Notice of Proposed Rulemaking : FAA

Attendance at Pilot Professional Development Conference

On January 11, 2017, the FAA attended the Pilot Professional Development Conference in Indianapolis, IN. The FAA presented an overview of the Pilot Professional Development Notice of Proposed Rule making and associated draft Advisory Circulars. The air carrier, union, and university representatives present at the meeting had an open discussion about various methods and programs currently being used to mentor pilots and to provide leadership training

.
#### Armin H. Mittlemann et al., as Trustees, Appellants, *v.*President and Directors of the Manhattan Company, Respondent.

(Argued October 21, 1936;

decided November 24, 1936.)

*633
      *John Holley Clark, Jr., Thomas Keogh, E. Crosby Kindleberger*and *Herbert Stern*for appellants.

*Simon H. Rifkind*and *Sidney R. Nussenfeld*for trustees of Series F-l, *amici curix.*

*634
      *Olin Potter Geer*for Cornelius J. Smyth, as trustee of Series A-2, *amicus curiæ.*

*Abraham J. Halprin*for trustees of Series C-2, B-K, B-l and C-3, *amici curiæ.*

*Elihu Root, Jr., Wilkie Bushby*and *Leo Gottlieb*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.; Crane, Ch. J., taking no part.
#### §§ 1918.70-1918.80 [Reserved]
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Kyocera Corporation
(the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 30, 2009



/S/    TETSUO
KUBAName:

Tetsuo KubaTitle:

President and Representative Director(Principal Executive Officer)
§ 1611.3 Procedures for requests pertaining to individual records in a record system. ( a ) Any person who wishes to be notified if a system of records maintained by the Commission contains any record pertaining to him or her, or to request access to such record or to request an accounting of disclosures made of such record, shall submit a written request, either in person or by mail, in accordance with the instructions set forth in the system notice published in the Federal Register. The request shall include: ( 1 ) The name of the individual making the request;
( 2 ) The name of the system of records (as set forth in the system notice to which the request relates);
( 3 ) Any other information specified in the system notice; and
( 4 ) When the request is for access to records, a statement indicating whether the requester desires to make a personal inspection of the records or be supplied with copies by mail.
( b ) Requests pertaining to records contained in a system of records established by the Commission and for which the Commission has published a system notice should be submitted to the person or office indicated in the system notice. Requests pertaining to Commission records contained in the government-wide systems of records listed below should be submitted as follows: ( 1 ) For systems OPM/GOVT-1 (General Personnel Records), OPM/GOVT-2 (Employee Performance File System Records), OPM/GOVT-3 (Records of Adverse Actions and Actions Based on Unacceptable Performance), OPM/GOVT-5 (Recruiting, Examining and Placement Records), OPM/GOVT-6 (Personnel Research and Test Validation Records), OPM/GOVT-9 (Files on Position Classification Appeals, Job Grading Appeals and Retained Grade or Pay Appeals), OPM/GOVT-10 (Employee Medical File System Records) and DOL/ESA-13 (Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Federal Employees' Compensation File), to the Director of Personnel Management Services, EEOC, 131 M Street, NE., Washington, DC 20507;
( 2 ) For systems OGE/GOVT-1 (Executive Branch Public Financial Disclosure Reports and Other Ethics Program Records), OGE/GOVT-2 (Confidential Statements of Employment and Financial Interests) and MSPB/GOVT-1 (Appeal and Case Records), to the Legal Counsel, EEOC, 131 M Street, NE., Washington, DC 20507;
( 3 ) For system OPM/GOVT-7 (Applicant Race, Sex, National Origin, and Disability Status Records), to the Director of the Office of Equal Employment Opportunity, EEOC, 131 M Street NE., Washington, DC 20507;
( 4 ) For systems GSA/GOVT-3 (Travel Charge Card Program) and GSA/GOVT-4 (Contracted Travel Services Program) to the Director of Financial and Resource Management Services, EEOC, 131 M Street, NE., Washington, DC 20507.
( c ) Any person whose request for access under paragraph (a) of this section is denied, may appeal that denial in accordance with § 1611.5(c).
[42 FR 7949, Feb. 8, 1977, as amended at 56 FR 29581, June 28, 1991; 74 FR 3430, Jan. 21, 2009]
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-4350

___________ Joseph L. Stephens, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States State of Arkansas; John Doe, * District Court for the Cummins Food Service Supervisor; * Eastern District of Arkansas. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * Department of Correction; Reed, * [UNPUBLISHED] Warden, Arkansas Department of * Correction; J. Gunnell, Officer, * Arkansas Department of Correction, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: June 5, 1998 Filed: June 25, 1998

___________ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.The Honorable John F. Forster, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern 1 District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to § 636(c). -2- Jo sephL. Stephens, an Arkansas prisoner, appeals from the district court & s 1 advers e judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed th e record and the parties & submissions on appeal, we conclude that judgment fo r defendants was a

ppropriate. Accordingly, we affirm. See8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Stephens & s pending motion. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D2 3

- 1738 Lower Tribunal No. 20 19

- CA

- 005037

- 0001

- XX

_____________________________ T HE L YKOS G ROUP , I NC

. , Appellant ,

v. J ONATHAN F EINS and A MY F EINS , Appellee s
.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County

. Joseph G. Foster , Judge. March 26, 2024
PER CURIAM

. AFFIRMED

. TRAVER , C

. J. , and WHITE and SMITH , JJ., c oncur.

Allison M. Perry, of Florida Appeal s , P.A. , Tampa , for Appellant. W. Ryan Murphy, of Law Office of Jursinski & Murphy, PLLC, Fort Myers , for Appellee s.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
## **Exhibit31.4**

##  

## Kentucky UtilitiesCompany

 

I, S. Bradford Rives, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of KentuckyUtilities Company;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 
| Date: March 30, 2005    |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
| /s/ S. Bradford Rives   |   |
| S. Bradford Rives       |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### § 1949.5 Refunds.

An applicant may withdraw an application and receive full reimbursement of the fee provided that written notification to the Institute Registrar is mailed no later than 14 days before the commencement of the course for which registration has been submitted.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.1091 Recordkeeping requirements.

Note:

The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.440 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-1910.440).

[[61 FR 31432](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31432), June 20, 1996]
# EUR-Lex - 32000R2451 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R2451

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2451/2000 of 7 November 2000 amending Regulation (EC) No 1622/2000 laying down certain detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine and establishing a Community code of oenological practices and processes, as regards Annex XIV **

*
Official Journal L 282 , 08/11/2000 P. 0007 - 0008 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 2451/2000

of 7 November 2000

amending Regulation (EC) No 1622/2000 laying down certain detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine and establishing a Community code of oenological practices and processes, as regards Annex XIV

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine(1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1622/2000(2), and in particular Articles 43 and 46 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Annex V(C)(4) to Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 provides that the limits on increases in the alcoholic strength of wine by volume may be raised by up to 1 % in years when weather conditions have been exceptionally unfavourable.

(2) Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1622/2000 specifies that these unfavourable years and the wine-growing zones, geographical regions and varieties concerned are to be as set out in Annex XIV to that Regulation.

(3) Because of the exceptionally adverse weather during 2000, the limits on increases in natural alcoholic strength laid down in Annex V(E) do not permit the production of wine in the wine-growing regions of the United Kingdom for which there would normally be market demand. The United Kingdom should therefore be authorised to augment natural alcoholic strength by up to 4,5 % vol and the year to which this derogation relates, together with the other relevant information, should be included in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1622/2000.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Wine,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1622/2000 is hereby supplemented as follows:

">TABLE>"

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 November 2000.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 179, 14.7.1999, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 194, 31.7.2000, p. 1.