alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.0



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Woronoco Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Cornelius D. Mahoney, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Cornelius D. MahoneyCornelius D. MahoneyChief Executive OfficerAugust 9, 2004




---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Woronoco Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Debra L. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Debra L. MurphyDebra L. MurphyChief Financial OfficerAugust 9, 2004




2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      13,417,467               4,864,317
<SECURITIES>                               236,014,844             200,817,593
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,000,000              25,788,876
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           330,180,460             231,651,346
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             330,180,460             231,651,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      225,637,739             144,295,131
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       104,158                 104,158
<OTHER-SE>                                 104,438,563              87,252,057
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               330,180,460             231,651,346
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,473,849              17,831,183
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,761,652               1,281,502
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,920,648               8,628,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,142,589               2,999,131
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,142,589               2,999,131
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.68                    0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.68                    0.63



</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 31998R1308 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998R1308

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1308/98 of 24 June 1998 fixing the final amount of aid for dried fodder for the 1997/98 marketing year **

*
Official Journal L 182 , 25/06/1998 P. 0009 - 0009 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1308/98 of 24 June 1998 fixing the final amount of aid for dried fodder for the 1997/98 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 603/95 of 21 February 1995 on the common organisation of the market in dried fodder (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1347/95 (2), and in particular Article 18 thereof,

Whereas Article 3(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 603/95 fix the amounts of aid to be paid to processors for dehydrated fodder and sun-dried fodder produced during the 1997/98 marketing year up to the maximum guaranteed quantities laid down in Article 4(1) and (3) of that Regulation;

Whereas the information forwarded to the Commission by the Member States under the second indent of Article 15(a) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 785/95 of 6 April 1995 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 603/95 on the common organisation of the market in dried fodder (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1794/97 (4), indicates that the abovementioned maximum guaranteed quantities have not been exceeded;

Whereas it should therefore be laid down that the aid provided for in Regulation (EC) No 603/95 for dehydrated fodder and sun-dried fodder should be paid in full;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Dried Fodder,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The aid for dehydrated fodder and sun-dried fodder provided for in Article 3(2) and (3) respectively of Regulation (EC) No 603/95 shall be paid in full for the 1997/98 marketing year.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 June 1998.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 63, 21. 3. 1995, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 131, 15. 6. 1995, p. 1.

(3) OJ L 79, 7. 4. 1995, p. 5.

(4) OJ L 255, 18. 9. 1997, p. 12.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 492 

To amend the FAST Act to improve contracting opportunities for serviceconnected disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Mr. CORNYN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the FAST Act to improve contracting opportunities for service-connected disabled veteran-owned small 

business concerns, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disabled Veterans Re5 building Infrastructure to Vitalize our Economy Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES. 

7 Section 1101(b) of the FAST Act (23 U.S.C. 101 

8 note; Public Law 114–94) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (2)— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 492 IS

1 (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) 

2 and (B) as subparagraphs (B) and (C), respec3 tively; and 

4 (B) by inserting before subparagraph (B) 

5 (as so redesignated) the following: 

6 ‘‘(A) SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABLED VET7 ERAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN.— 

8 The term ‘service-connected disabled veteran9 owned small business concern’ has the meaning 

10 given the term ‘small business concern owned 

11 and controlled by service-disabled veterans’ in 

12 section 3(q) of the Small Business Act (15 

13 U.S.C. 632(q)).’’; 

14 (2) in paragraph (3)— 

15 (A) by striking ‘‘not less than 10 percent’’; 

16 (B) by striking ‘‘Code, shall be’’ and in17 serting the following: ‘‘Code— 

18 ‘‘(A) not less than 10 percent shall be’’; 

19 (C) in subparagraph (A) (as so des20 ignated), by striking the period at the end and 

21 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

22 (D) by adding at the end the following: 

23 ‘‘(B) to the maximum extent practicable, 

24 not less than 5 percent shall be expended 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 492 IS

1 through service-connected disabled veteran2 owned small business concerns.’’; and 

3 (3) in paragraph (4)(B)— 

4 (A) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

5 end; 

6 (B) in clause (iii), by striking the period at 

7 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

8 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(iv) service-disabled veterans (as de10 fined in section 3(q) of the Small Business 

11 Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q))).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 31995R0306 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995R0306

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 306/95 of 15 February 1995 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3515/92 laying down common detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1055/77 on the storage and movement of products bought in by an intervention agency **

*
Official Journal L 036 , 16/02/1995 P. 0001 - 0001 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 306/95 of 15 February 1995 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3515/92 laying down common detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1055/77 on the storage and movement of products bought in by an intervention agency

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1055/77 of 17 May 1977 on the storage and movement of products bought in by an intervention agency (1), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas due to the accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden to the European Union, it is necessary to introduce linguistic adjustments in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3515/92 (2);

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of all Management Committees concerned,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EEC) No 3515/92 is hereby amended as follows:

1. the following entries are added to Article 2, second subparagraph:

'- Interventionsprodukter som innehas av . . . . . . (interventionsorganets namn och adress) foer lagring i . . . . . . (beroert land och adress till det tilltaenkta lagringsstaellet). Tillaempning av artikel 2 foersta strecksatsen i foerordning (EEG) nr 1055/77

- Interventiotuotteita, jotka ovat . . . . . . (interventioelimen nimi ja osoite) hallussa ja jotka on tarkoitus varastoida . . . . . . (kyseessae olevan maan ja ehdotetun varastointipaikan osoite). Asetuksen (ETY) N :o 1055/77 2 artiklan ensimmaeisen luetelmakohdan mukainen soveltaminen.';

2. the following entries are added in Article 5, first subparagraph:

'- Interventionsprodukter - oeverfoeringsfoerfarande,

- Interventiotuotteita - siirtotoimi'.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply with effect from 1 January 1995.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 February 1995.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 128, 24. 5. 1977, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 355, 5. 12. 1992, p. 15.
§ 1635.10 Enforcement and remedies. ( a ) *Powers and procedures:* The following powers and procedures shall apply to allegations that Title II of GINA has been violated: ( 1 ) The powers and procedures provided to the Commission, the Attorney General, or any person by sections 705 through 707 and 709 through 711 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-4 through 2000e-6 and 2000e-8 through 2000e-10, where the alleged discrimination is against an employee defined in 1635.2(c)(1) of this part or against a member of a labor organization;
( 2 ) The powers and procedures provided to the Commission and any person by sections 302 and 304 of the Government Employees Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16b and 2000e-16c, and in regulations at 29 CFR part 1603, where the alleged discrimination is against an employee as defined in § 1635.2(c)(2) of this part;
( 3 ) The powers and procedures provided to the Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance and to any person under the Congressional Accountability Act, 2 U.S.C. 1301 *et seq.* (including the provisions of Title 3 of that act, 2 U.S.C. 1381 *et seq.*), where the alleged discrimination is against an employee defined in § 1635.2(c)(3) of this part;
( 4 ) The powers and procedures provided in 3 U.S.C. 451 *et seq.,* to the President, the Commission, or any person in connection with an alleged violation of section 3 U.S.C. 411(a)(1), where the alleged discrimination is against an employee defined in § 1635.2(c)(4) of this part;
( 5 ) The powers and procedures provided to the Commission, the Librarian of Congress, and any person by section 717 of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16, where the alleged discrimination is against an employee defined in § 1635.2(c)(5) of this part.
( b ) *Remedies.* The following remedies are available for violations of GINA sections 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, and 207(f): ( 1 ) Compensatory and punitive damages as provided for, and limited by, 42 U.S.C. 1981a(a)(1) and (b);
( 2 ) Reasonable attorney's fees, including expert fees, as provided for, and limited by, 42 U.S.C. 1988(b) and (c); and
( 3 ) Injunctive relief, including reinstatement and hiring, back pay, and other equitable remedies as provided for, and limited by, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(g).
( c ) *Posting of Notices.* ( 1 ) Every covered entity shall post and keep posted in conspicuous places upon its premises where notices to employees, applicants for employment, and members are customarily posted a notice to be prepared or approved by the Commission setting forth excerpts from or, summaries of, the pertinent provisions of this regulation and information pertinent to the filing of a complaint.
( 2 ) A willful violation of this requirement shall be punishable by a fine of not more than $100 for each separate offense.
#### Paul Williams, App’lt., *v.*William Hays, Resp’t.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,*

*Filed May*24, *1889.)*

Practice—Stay of proceedings—When order not disturbed.

Where the discretion of the court denying a stay until the hearing upon, appeal of a case pending in another court, has been fairly and properly exercised, it will not be disturbed by the appellate court.

Appeal from so much of an order as denies the plaintiff’s motion for a stay of this action, pending an appeal to the general term of the superior court, in the action of *Hays*v. *The Phoenix Insurance Company.*

*George A. Black,*for app’lt; *Goodrich, Beady & Goodrich,*for resp’t.

Macomber, J.

The decision upon the appeal by the plaintiff from an order permitting the appellant to file a supplemental answer, (23 N. Y. State Rep., 489,) alleging the result of the trial in the superior court of the city of New York, in the case of *Hays v. The Phœnix Insurance Company,*practically decides this motion also. That portion of the order, not appealed from, granted a stay pending this *684appea., and propbrly denied a stay until the hearing upon appeal of the casé pending in the superior court of the city of néw York in the action brought by this defendant against the insurance company. Such stay was obviously all the court should have granted, and the discretion of the court seems to have been fairly exercised, and should not be disturbed.

Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Van Brunt, Oh. J., and Bartlett, J., concur.
#### § 1988.113 Judicial enforcement.

Whenever any person has failed to comply with a preliminary order of reinstatement, or a final order, including one approving a settlement agreement, issued under MAP-21, the Secretary may file a civil action seeking enforcement of the order in the United States district court for the district in which the violation was found to have occurred. Whenever any person has failed to comply with a preliminary order of reinstatement, or a final order, including one approving a settlement agreement, issued under MAP-21, a person on whose behalf the order was issued may file a civil action seeking enforcement of the order in the appropriate United States district court.
Phone conversation record

Date: February 8, 2011

Subject: Status of International Paper Company Springfield Mill Title V Permit

Contact: Max Hueftle, permit writer, LRAPA 

I discussed the status of the International Paper Company Title V permit (# 208850) with permit 

writer Max Heuftie today. The copy of the permit we received from ODEQ shows an expiration 

date of June 30, 2010. Mr. Hueftle confirmed that a request to renew this permit from 

International Paper Company was received by LRAPA 12 months in advance of this expiration 

date, and therefore will be renewed by LRAPA once addition requirements, identified in recent

and upcoming federal regulations, have been incorporated into this permit. The current permit is 

valid until the new permit is issued by LRAPA.
# EUR-Lex - 31999D0220 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999D0220

**1999/220/EC: Commission Decision of 23 March 1999 amending Decision 87/257/EEC on the list of establishments in the United States of America approved for the purpose of importing fresh meat into the Community (notified under document number C(1999) 711) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 080 , 25/03/1999 P. 0029 - 0033 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 23 March 1999 amending Decision 87/257/EEC on the list of establishments in the United States of America approved for the purpose of importing fresh meat into the Community (notified under document number C(1999) 711) (Text with EEA relevance) (1999/220/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine, ovine and caprine animals and swine, fresh meat or meat products from third countries (1), as last amended by Directive 97/79/EC (2), and in particular Articles 4(1) and 18(1) thereof,

(1) Whereas a list of establishments in the United States of America, approved for the purpose of importing fresh meat into the Community, was drawn up initially by Commission Decision 87/257/EEC of 28 April 1987 (3), as last amended by the Decision 1999/85/EC of 1 February 1999 (4); whereas that list may be amended at any time in the light of the results of Community inspections carried out in the United States of America;

(2) Whereas routine inspections made in application of Article 5 of Directive 72/462/EEC have revealed that the level of hygiene of certain establishments may be considered to be satisfactory; whereas these establishments may therefore be maintained or entered on the said list;

(3) Whereas the list of establishments must be amended accordingly;

(4) Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 87/257/EEC is hereby replaced by the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 March 1999.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28.

(2) OJ L 24, 30. 1. 1998, p. 31.

(3) OJ L 121, 9. 5. 1987, p. 55.

(4) OJ L 27, 2. 2. 1999, p. 32.

ANNEX

>TABLE>
§ 1980.103 Filing of retaliation complaints. ( a ) *Who may file.* An employee who believes that he or she has been retaliated against by a covered person in violation of the Act may file, or have filed on the employee's behalf, a complaint alleging such retaliation.
( b ) *Nature of filing.* No particular form of complaint is required. A complaint may be filed orally or in writing. Oral complaints will be reduced to writing by OSHA. If the complainant is unable to file the complaint in English, OSHA will accept the complaint in any language.
( c ) *Place of filing.* The complaint should be filed with the OSHA office responsible for enforcement activities in the geographical area where the employee resides or was employed, but may be filed with any OSHA officer or employee. Addresses and telephone numbers for these officials are set forth in local directories and at the following Internet address: *http://www.osha.gov .*
( d ) *Time for filing.* Within 180 days after an alleged violation of the Act occurs or after the date on which the employee became aware of the alleged violation of the Act, any employee who believes that he or she has been retaliated against in violation of the Act may file, or have filed on the employee's behalf, a complaint alleging such retaliation. The date of the postmark, facsimile transmittal, electronic communication transmittal, telephone call, hand-delivery, delivery to a third-party commercial carrier, or in-person filing at an OSHA office will be considered the date of filing. The time for filing a complaint may be tolled for reasons warranted by applicable case law. For example, OSHA may consider the time for filing a complaint equitably tolled if a complainant mistakenly files a complaint with the another agency instead of OSHA within 180 days after becoming aware of the alleged violation.