alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
71°22'30"

71°22'30"

71°30'

71°30'

42°7'30" 42°7'30"

42°0' 42°0'

SCALE 1:24,000

FRANKLIN QUADRANGLE

1 0.5 0 1 MILES

1 0.5 0 1 KILOMETERS

Stone, B.D., Stone, J.R., and DiGiacomo-Cohen, M.L., 2008, Surficial

geologic map of the Worcester North-Oxford-Wrentham-Attleboro

nine-quadrangle area in south-central Massachusetts: U.S. Geological

Survey Open-File Report 2006-1260-D.

Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1260/D.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

OFFICE OF THE STATE GEOLOGIST

AND EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS

Prepared in cooperation with the OPEN-FILE REPORT 2006-1260-D

Explanatory pamphlet accompanies map

Surficial Geologic Map of the Franklin Quadrangle, Massachusetts

Compiled by

Byron D. Stone, Janet R. Stone, and Mary L. DiGiacomo-Cohen

2008

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, 1964.

Map was scanned, processed, georeferenced,

rectified, and cropped by the Office of the

Massachusetts State Geologist. Image available online at:

http://www.geo.umass.edu/stategeologist/frame_maps.htm

Geology mapped by B.D. Stone in 1982. Bedrock

outcrops mapped by Lyons, P.C. (1977). Additional

outcrops from Richard Goldsmith. Some postglacial

units mapped using 2005 orthophoto images. CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

(SHEET 6 of 8)

(HOLLISTON)

(PAWTUCKET)

(BLA

C

KS

T

O

NE)

(WR

EN

THA

M)
# EUR-Lex - 32000D0406 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000D0406

**2000/406/EC: Commission Decision of 9 June 2000 approving the programme of new olive tree planting in Portugal (notified under document number C(2000) 1576) (Only the Portuguese text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 154 , 27/06/2000 P. 0033 - 0033 *

Commission Decision

of 9 June 2000

approving the programme of new olive tree planting in Portugal

(notified under document number C(2000) 1576)

(Only the Portuguese text is authentic)

(2000/406/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1638/98 of 20 July 1998 amending Regulation No 136/66/EEC on the establishment of a common organisation of the market in oils and fats(1), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2366/98 of 30 October 1998 laying down detailed rules for the appliction of the system of production aid for olive oil for the 1998/99, 1999/2000 and 2000/01 marketing years(2), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1273/1999(3), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1638/98 provides that no aid under the common organisation of the market in oils and fats in force from 1 November 2001 may be paid to olive growers in respect of additional olive trees and the relevant areas planted after 1 May 1998 and those not covered by a cultivation declaration at a date to be determined. However, pursuant to the same Article, additional olive trees planted in connection with the conversion of old olive plantations and new plantings on areas covered by programmes approved by the Commission may be taken into account within certain limits to be determined.

(2) Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1638/98 provides for a programme to be approved by the Commission covering 30000 hectares in Portugal.

(3) The Portuguese national programme of new plantings forwarded on 13 April 2000 by the Portuguese authorities to the Commission for approval contains the information specified in Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2366/98. The programme covers the whole area provided for in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1638/98.

(4) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Oils and Fats,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Portuguese national programme for new planting of 30000 hectares of olive groves provided for in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1638/98 is hereby approved.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Portuguese Republic.

Done at Brussels, 9 June 2000.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 210, 28.7.1998, p. 32.

(2) OJ L 293, 31.10.1998, p. 50.

(3) OJ L 151, 18.6.1999, p. 12.
| /s/  David L.      Cheek                                                                                               David      L. CheekPresident      and Chief Executive OfficerMarch      12, 2009 | /s/  Bert E. Downing,      Jr.                                                                                        Bert      E. Downing, Jr.Vice      President, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate      Controller and TreasurerMarch      12, 2009 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.1060 Training requirements. The following training provisions clarify the requirements of § 1926.21(b)(2), regarding the hazards addressed in subpart X. ( a ) The employer shall provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary. The program shall enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways, and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. ( 1 ) The employer shall ensure that each employee has been trained by a competent person in the following areas, as applicable: ( i ) The nature of fall hazards in the work area;
( ii ) The correct procedures for erecting, maintaining, and disassembling the fall protection systems to be used;
( iii ) The proper construction, use, placement, and care in handling of all stairways and ladders;
( iv ) The maximum intended load-carrying capacities of ladders used; and
( v ) The standards contained in this subpart.
( b ) Retraining shall be provided for each employee as necessary so that the employee maintains the understanding and knowledge acquired through compliance with this section.
# EUR-Lex - 32000D0754 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000D0754

**2000/754/EC: Commission Decision of 24 November 2000 amending Decision 93/195/EEC on animal health conditions and veterinary certification for the re-entry of registered horses for racing, competition and cultural events after temporary export (notified under document number C(2000) 3552) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 303 , 02/12/2000 P. 0034 - 0035 *

Commission Decision

of 24 November 2000

amending Decision 93/195/EEC on animal health conditions and veterinary certification for the re-entry of registered horses for racing, competition and cultural events after temporary export

(notified under document number C(2000) 3552)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2000/754/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/426/EEC of 26 June 1990 on animal health conditions governing the movement and import from third countries of equidae(1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 19(ii) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) In accordance with Commission Decision 93/195/EEC(2), as last amended by Decision 2000/209/EC(3), the re-entry of registered horses for racing, competition and cultural events after temporary export is restricted to horses kept for less than 30 days in a third country.

(2) In order to make it easier for horses originating in the Community to take part in the Japan Cup and the Hong Kong International Races, that period should be extended to less than 90 days.

(3) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 93/195/EEC is amended as follows:

1. A sixth indent is added to Article 1 as follows:

"- have taken part in the Japan Cup and the Hong Kong International Races and meet the requirements laid down in a health certificate in accordance with the model set out in Annex VI to this Decision."

2. The Annex to this Decision is added as Annex VI.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 November 2000.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 42.

(2) OJ L 86, 6.4.1993, p. 1.

(3) OJ L 64, 11.3.2000, p. 22.

ANNEX

"ANNEX VI

>PIC FILE= "L_2000303EN.003503.EPS">"
Exhibit-23


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
One City Centre
St. Louis, MO 63101

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-40362 and 33-52357 of Laclede Gas Company on Form S-3 and in
Registration Statement Nos. 33-38413, 33-57573 and 33-64933 of Laclede Gas
Company on Form S-8 of our report dated November 16, 2000, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Laclede Gas Company for the year ended
September 30, 2000.


Deloitte & Touche LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
December 13, 2000









































                                106
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 821 

To amend section 402 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity 

Reconciliation Act of 1996 to provide for an extension of eligibility 

for supplemental security income through fiscal year 2010 for refugees, 

asylees, and certain other humanitarian immigrants. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 8, 2007 

Mr. SMITH (for himself, Mr. KOHL, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. CARDIN, and Mrs. 

CLINTON) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend section 402 of the Personal Responsibility and 

Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 to provide 

for an extension of eligibility for supplemental security 

income through fiscal year 2010 for refugees, asylees, 

and certain other humanitarian immigrants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SSI Extension for El5 derly and Disabled Refugees Act’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 821 IS

1 SEC. 2. SSI EXTENSION FOR HUMANITARIAN IMMIGRANTS. 

2 Section 402(a)(2) of the Personal Responsibility and 

3 Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 

4 1612(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(M) SSI EXTENSION THROUGH FISCAL

7 YEAR 2010.— 

8 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—With respect to 

9 eligibility for benefits for the specified Fed10 eral program described in paragraph 

11 (3)(A), the 7-year period described in sub12 paragraph (A) shall be deemed to be a 9- 

13 year period during the period that begins 

14 on the date of enactment of the SSI Ex15 tension for Elderly and Disabled Refugees 

16 Act and ends on September 30, 2010. 

17 ‘‘(ii) ALIENS WHOSE BENEFITS

18 CEASED IN PRIOR FISCAL YEARS.— 

19 ‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—Beginning on 

20 the date of the enactment of the SSI 

21 Extension for Elderly and Disabled 

22 Refugees Act, any qualified alien ren23 dered ineligible for the specified Fed24 eral program described in paragraph 

25 (3)(A) during fiscal years prior to the 

26 fiscal year in which such Act is enVerDate Aug 31 2005 21:38 Mar 10, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S821.IS S821

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•S 821 IS

1 acted solely by reason of the termi2 nation of the 7-year period described 

3 in subparagraph (A) shall be eligible 

4 for such program for an additional 2- 

5 year period in accordance with this 

6 subparagraph, if such alien meets all 

7 other eligibility factors under title 

8 XVI of the Social Security Act. 

9 ‘‘(II) PAYMENT OF BENEFITS.— 

10 Benefits paid under subparagraph (I) 

11 shall be paid prospectively over the 

12 duration of the qualified alien’s re13 newed eligibility.’’. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
§ 91.17 Alcohol or drugs. ( a ) No person may act or attempt to act as a crewmember of a civil aircraft— ( 1 ) Within 8 hours after the consumption of any alcoholic beverage;
( 2 ) While under the influence of alcohol;
( 3 ) While using any drug that affects the person's faculties in any way contrary to safety; or
( 4 ) While having an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater in a blood or breath specimen. Alcohol concentration means grams of alcohol per deciliter of blood or grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath.
( b ) Except in an emergency, no pilot of a civil aircraft may allow a person who appears to be intoxicated or who demonstrates by manner or physical indications that the individual is under the influence of drugs (except a medical patient under proper care) to be carried in that aircraft.
( c ) A crewmember shall do the following: ( 1 ) On request of a law enforcement officer, submit to a test to indicate the alcohol concentration in the blood or breath, when— ( i ) The law enforcement officer is authorized under State or local law to conduct the test or to have the test conducted; and
( ii ) The law enforcement officer is requesting submission to the test to investigate a suspected violation of State or local law governing the same or substantially similar conduct prohibited by paragraph (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(4) of this section.
( 2 ) Whenever the FAA has a reasonable basis to believe that a person may have violated paragraph (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(4) of this section, on request of the FAA, that person must furnish to the FAA the results, or authorize any clinic, hospital, or doctor, or other person to release to the FAA, the results of each test taken within 4 hours after acting or attempting to act as a crewmember that indicates an alcohol concentration in the blood or breath specimen.
( d ) Whenever the Administrator has a reasonable basis to believe that a person may have violated paragraph (a)(3) of this section, that person shall, upon request by the Administrator, furnish the Administrator, or authorize any clinic, hospital, doctor, or other person to release to the Administrator, the results of each test taken within 4 hours after acting or attempting to act as a crewmember that indicates the presence of any drugs in the body.
( e ) Any test information obtained by the Administrator under paragraph (c) or (d) of this section may be evaluated in determining a person's qualifications for any airman certificate or possible violations of this chapter and may be used as evidence in any legal proceeding under section 602, 609, or 901 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958.
[Doc. No. 18334, 54 FR 34292, Aug. 18, 1989, as amended by Amdt. 91-291, June 21, 2006]
#### § 1955.46 Finality for purposes of judicial review.

Only a final decision by the Secretary under § 1955.44 shall be deemed final agency action for purposes of judicial review. A decision of an administrative law judge which becomes final for lack of appeal is not deemed final agency action for purposes of 5 U.S.C. 704.
#### STATE OF FLORIDA v NEFF

Case No. 84-320 AC

Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Appellate Division, Dade County

October 14, 1986

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Jim Smith, Attorney General, and G. Bart Bilibrough, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Gary S. Milner for appellee.

Before SALMON, KAYE, GREENBAUM, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MICHAEL H. SALMON, Judge.

After the speedy trial period to bring the defendant to trial had been *148extended several times because of exceptional circumstances (the absence of the technician), the State announced, even though the witness was still unavailable, that it was ready to proceed to trial without the witness. The announcement was made within the speedy trial period pursuant to the previous orders. Nonetheless, the trial judge granted a motion for discharge in violation of Rule 3.191, Fla. R. Crim. P. The motion was untimely because the speedy trial period had not expired, see *State v. Sagre,*435 So.2d 977 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), and, in any event, the State was privileged to proceed without the witness.

Reversed and remanded, with directions to proceed to trial.

KAYE and GREENBAUM, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE 12/31/99 FORM
10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001062663
<NAME>                        FULL TILT SPORTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              5,687
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      82,449
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                       161,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  448,424
<PP&E>                                             32,542
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (8,405)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    475,678
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             139,001
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                        50,000
<COMMON>                                            3,940
<OTHER-SE>                                        278,979
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      475,678
<SALES>                                           289,180
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  289,180
<CGS>                                              89,905
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      89,905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,712,516
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  4,763
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,511,586)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,511,586)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                          (5,000)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,516,586)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.41)



</TABLE>
§ 1960.18 Supplementary standards. ( a ) In addition to complying with emergency temporary standards issued under section 6 of the Act, an agency head shall adopt such emergency temporary and permanent supplementary standards as necessary and appropriate for application to working conditions of agency employees for which there exists no appropriate OSHA standards. In order to avoid any possible duplication of effort, the agency head should notify the Secretary of the subject matter of such standard when the development of the standard begins.
( b ) The agency head shall send a copy of the final draft of the permanent supplementary standard to the Secretary prior to official adoption by the agency, along with any written comments on the standard from interested employees, employee representatives, and occupational safety and health committees. If the Secretary finds the permanent supplementary standard to be adopted inconsistent with OSHA standards, or inconsistent with OSHA enforcement practices under section 5(a)(1) of the Act, the Secretary shall have 15 working days in which to notify the head of the agency of this finding. In such a case, the supplementary standard shall not be adopted, but the agency will be afforded an opportunity to resubmit a revised standard that is designed to provide adequate protection and is consistent with OSHA standards. Upon request of the agency head, the Secretary shall offer to the agency technical assistance in the development of the supplemental standard.
#### LESLIE v STATE

Ohio Appeals, 3rd Dist, Hancock Co

No 243.

Decided April 8, 1929

John W Hackett and W H Kinder, Find-lay, for Leslie.

John E Priddy and A G Fuller, both of Findlay, for State.

*300HUGHES, J.

There is nothing disclosed showing that any officer or agent of the State of Ohio did anything unreasonable or unlawful in obtaining possession of this property, and we find no error in the refusal of the court to grant this motion.

This also disposes of the alleged error in permitting the state to use in evidence, the shoes that were taken from the trunk, using, the same for the purpose of fitting on a pair of overshoes that were discarded by the fleeing murderer or murderers.

The weight of the evidence is presented-to us for consideration, and we have read the record carefully.

Even in the face of all the circumstances, one might be persuaded to entertain a doubt of the guilt of the defendant, were there not added to this chain of circumstances the fact that he did not testify in his own behalf. When one is being tried for a crime which may mean even his life, and in any event his liberty, it seems almost unbelievable that if innocent he could be persuaded to refrain from raising his own voice in'a protest of innocence. It is such a fact as warrants a~ jury and also a reviewing court, in giving much thought and consideration thereto.

We cannot come to the conclusion that the verdict is not sustained by the required degree of proof.

There was some evidence permitted to go to the jury regarding the flight of one Willis and a woman, and other testimony regarding conversations held with, and declarations made by, this Willis to the witness. But during the course of the trial, this was taken from the jury’s consideration, with appropriate instructions and comment by the trial judge, and we find no prejudicial error in this respect.

The other errors complained of are such that we are satisfied to say, without an elaborate discussion of the questions raised, that there is found in none meriting, the finding of prejudice.

For the reasons given, the judgment must be affirmed.

Before Judges Hughes, Justice & Crow.