Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 17, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 31267

1Among other things, the pre-amendment

guidance consists of those portions of the proposed

Post-1987 ozone and carbon monoxide policy that

concern RACT, 52 FR 45044 (November 24, 1987);

‘‘Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints,

Deficiencies, and Deviations, Clarification to

Appendix D of November 24, 1987 Federal Register

document’’ (Blue Book) (notice of availability was

published in the Federal Register on May 25, 1988);

and the existing control technique guidelines

(CTGs).

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 226–0186a; FRL–6606–3]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; California State

Implementation Plan Revision,

Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control

District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final

action on revisions to the California

State Implementation Plan for the

Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control

District (AVAPCD). The six revisions

consist of: three rule recissions with

accompanying negative declarations for

source categories that emit volatile

organic compounds (VOC); two negative

declarations for source categories that

emit oxides of nitrogen (NOX), and one

rule recission for a source category that

emits oxides of sulfur (SOX). The

intended effect of this action is to bring

the AVAPCD SIP up to date in

accordance with the requirements of the

Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990

(CAA or the Act). EPA is finalizing the

approval of recissions from the

California SIP and the approval of these

negative declarations as additional

information to the California SIP under

provisions of the CAA regarding EPA

action on SIP submittals, SIPs for

national primary and secondary ambient

air quality standards and plan

requirements for nonattainment areas.

DATES: This rule is effective on July 17,

2000 without further notice, unless EPA

receives adverse comments by June 16,

2000. If EPA receives such comment, it

will publish a timely withdrawal in the

Federal Register informing the public

that this rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Written comments must be

submitted to Andrew Steckel, Chief,

Rulemaking Office at the Region IX

office listed below. Copies of the rule

revisions and EPA’s technical support

document are available for public

inspection at EPA’s Region IX office

during normal business hours. Copies of

the submitted rule revisions are

available for inspection at the following

locations:

Rulemaking Office (AIR–4), Air

Division, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region IX, 75

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA

94105

Environmental Protection Agency, Air

Docket (6102), 401 ‘‘M’’ Street, SW.,

Washington, DC 20460

California Air Resources Board,

Stationary Source Division, Rule

Evaluation Section, 2020 ‘‘L’’ Street,

Sacramento, CA 95812

Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control

District, 43301 Division Street, Suite

206, Lancaster, CA 93539–4409

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie

A. Rose, Rulemaking Office, AIR–4, Air

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne

Street, San Francisco, CA 94105,

Telephone: (415) 744–1184.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Applicability

The rules being approved for recission

and the negative declarations being

approved for the Antelope Valley Air

Pollution Control District (AVAPCD)

portion of the California SIP are listed

in the following Table:

SUBMITTED RECISSIONS AND NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS

Rule number and title Adoption date Submittal date Type of revision

1105, Fluid Catalytic Cracking Units—Oxides of Sulfur ............................ 04–21–98 05–13–99 Recission.

1109, Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Boilers and Process Heaters in Petroleum Refineries.04–21–98 05–13–99 Negative Declaration.

1112, Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Cement Kilns ...................... 03–16–99 07–23–99 Negative Declaration.

1115, Motor Vehicle Assembly Line Coating Operations ......................... 11–18–97 01–12–99 Recission/Negative Declaration.

1117, Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Glass Melting Furnaces ..... 03–16–99 07–23–99 Recission/Negative Declaration.

1123, Refinery Process Turnarounds ........................................................ 11–08–97 02–16–99 Recission/Negative Declaration.

II. Background

On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated

a list of ozone nonattainment areas

under the provisions of the Clean Air

Act, as amended in l977 (1977 Act or

pre-amended Act), that included the

Southeast Desert Modified Air Quality

Maintenance Area and the Los AngelesSouth Coast Air Basin Area. 43 FR 8964,

40 CFR 81.305. On May 26, 1988, EPA

notified the Governor of California,

pursuant to section 110(a)(2)(H) of the

1977 Act, that the above SCAQMD’s

portion of the California SIP was

inadequate to attain and maintain the

ozone standard and requested that

deficiencies in the existing SIP be

corrected (EPA’s SIP-Call). On

November 15, 1990, the Clean Air Act

Amendments of 1990 were enacted.

Public Law 101–549, 104 Stat. 2399,

codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q. In

amended section 182(a)(2)(A) of the

CAA, Congress statutorily adopted the

requirement that nonattainment areas

fix their deficient reasonably available

control technology (RACT) rules for

ozone and established a deadline of May

15, 1991 for states to submit corrections

of those deficiencies. Amended section

182(f) of the CAA contains the air

quality planning requirements for the

reduction of NOX emissions through

RACT.

Section 182(a)(2)(A) applies to areas

designated as nonattainment prior to

enactment of the amendments and

classified as marginal or above as of the

date of enactment. It requires such areas

to adopt and correct RACT rules

pursuant to pre-amended section 172(b)

as interpreted in pre-amendment

guidance.1 EPA’s SIP-Call used that

guidance to indicate the necessary

corrections for specific nonattainment

areas.

Section 182(f) of the CAA requires

States to apply the same requirements to

major stationary sources of NOx

(‘‘major’’ as defined in section 302 and

section 182(c), (d), and (e)) as are

applied to major stationary sources of

VOCs, in moderate or above ozone

nonattainment areas.

The Southeast Desert Modified Air

Quality Maintenance Area is classified

as Severe–17, therefore, this area was

subject to the RACT fix-up requirement

and the May 15, 1991 deadline. The Los

Angeles-South Coast Air Basin Area is

classified as Extreme and was also

31268 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 17, 2000 / Rules and Regulations

2The Antelope Valley region of Los Angeles

County is contained within the Federal area known

as the Southeast Desert Modified Air Quality

Management Area and the region identified by the

State of California as the Mojave Desert Air Basin.

3EPA adopted the completeness criteria on

February 16, 1990 (55 FR 5830) and, pursuant to

section 110(k)(1)(A) of the CAA, revised the criteria

on August 26, 1991 (56 FR 42216).

subject to the RACT fix-up requirements

and the May 15, 1991 deadline.

The Antelope Valley Air Pollution

Control District (AVAPCD) was created

pursuant to California Health and Safety

Code (CHSC) section 40106 and

assumed all air pollution control

responsibilities of the South Coast Air

Quality Management District

(SCAQMD) in the Antelope Valley

region of Los Angeles County,2 effective

July 1, 1997. AVAPCD is the successor

agency to SCAQMD in the Antelope

Valley portion of the Southeast Desert

Modified Air Quality Maintenance Area.

The AVAPCD remains subject to the

RACT requirements.

The AVAPCD has rescinded Rules

1105, 1115, 1117, and 1123 and has

submitted negative declarations to

certify that there are no sources covered

by these rules within the jurisdiction of

the AVAPCD. One minor source in

AVAPCD, previously regulated by Rule

1115, is now equivalently regulated

under Rule 1151, which was recently

approved by EPA into the SIP.

AVAPCD also submitted negative

declarations for Rules 1109 and 1112 to

certify that there are no sources covered

by these rules within the jurisdiction of

the AVAPCD. There is no action to

rescind Rules 1109 and 1112 since they

are not contained in the federally

enforceable SIP for the SCAQMD.

The State of California submitted

these rule revisions for incorporation

into its SIP on January 12, 1999,

February 16, 1999, May 13, 1999, and

July 23, 1999. The revisions submitted

on these dates were found complete on

March 19, 1999, April 23, 1999, June 10,

1999, and August 24, 1999, respectively.

The rules were reviewed pursuant to

EPA’s completeness criteria that are set

forth in 40 CFR part 51, Appendix V.3

This document addresses EPA’s

direct-final action for the recission of

AVAPCD Rule 1105, Fluid Catalytic

Cracking Units-Oxides of Sulfur, Rule

1115, Motor Vehicle Assembly Line

Coating Operations, Rule 1117,

Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from

Glass Melting Furnaces, and Rule 1123,

Refinery Process Turnarounds.

AVAPCD Rule 1105 limits SOX

emissions produced by Catalytic

Cracking Units. AVAPCD Rule 1115

controls volatile organic compound

(VOC) emissions from automobile

assembly line surface coating

operations. AVAPCD Rule 1117 limits

oxides of nitrogen (NOX) emissions

produced by Glass Melting Furnaces.

AVAPCD Rule 1123 controls VOC

emissions from petroleum refineries.

This document also addresses EPA’s

direct-final action of two negative

declarations for AVAPCD Rule 1109,

Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from

Boilers and Process Heaters in

Petroleum Refineries and Rule 1112,

Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from

Cement Kilns. Rule 1109 controls NOX

emissions from boilers and process

heaters in petroleum refineries and Rule

1112 controls NOX emissions from

cement kiln operations. Rules 1109 and

1112 are currently not part of the

SCAQMD SIP.

The rules were originally adopted as

part of SCAQMD’s effort to achieve the

National Ambient Air Quality Standard

(NAAQS) for ozone and in response to

EPA’s SIP-Call and the section

182(a)(2)(A) CAA requirement. The

following is EPA’s evaluation and final

action for these rule recissions and

negative declarations.

III. EPA Evaluation and Action

EPA evaluated all the appropriate

background and submittal

documentation and has determined that

the recission of AVAPCD Rules 1105,

1115, 1117, and 1123 is approvable.

EPA also evaluated all the appropriate

background and submittal

documentation for the negative

declarations for Rules 1109 and 1112,

1115, 1117, and 1123 and has

determined that they are approvable.

The AVAPCD has certified with

Negative Declarations that the sources

regulated by all of the rules listed in this

action are not present in the AVAPCD.

Further, the AVAPCD also stated that

they do not anticipate these types of

sources in the future.

The rule recissions and the negative

declarations are consistent with the

CAA, EPA regulations, and EPA policy.

Therefore, the recission of AVAPCD

Rules 1105, 1115, 1117, and 1123 is

being approved under section 110(k)(3)

of the CAA as meeting the requirements

of section 110(a) and part D. The

negative declarations for Rules 1109,

1112, 1115, 1117, and 1123 are being

approved under section 110(k)(3) of the

CAA as meeting the requirements of

section 110(a) and part D.

The source categories represented by

AVAPCD Rules 1109, 1112, 1115, 1117,

and 1123 will now be inserted into the

listing of negative declarations in 40

CFR 52.222, Negative Declarations.

Three additional source categories for

AVAPCD are being inserted into 40 CFR

52.222 in this action. The negative

declarations are Marine Vessel Coating

Operations, Marine Tank Vessel

Operations, and Thermally Enhanced

Oil Recovery Wells. These negative

declarations were adopted on January

20, 1998, submitted on June 23, 1998,

and approved in the Federal Register on

January 13, 1999 (64 FR 2141).

EPA is publishing this rule without

prior proposal because the Agency

views this as a noncontroversial

amendment and anticipates no adverse

comments. However, in the proposed

rules section of this Federal Register

publication, EPA is publishing a

separate document that will serve as the

proposal to approve the SIP revision

should adverse comments be filed. This

rule will be effective July 17, 2000

without further notice unless the

Agency receives adverse comments by

June 16, 2000.

If the EPA receives such comments,

then EPA will publish a timely

withdrawal in the Federal Register

informing the public that the rule will

not take effect. All public comments

received will then be addressed in a

subsequent final rule based on the

proposed rule. The EPA will not

institute a second comment period on

this rule. Any parties interested in

commenting on this rule should do so

at this time. If no such comments are

received, the public is advised that this

rule will be effective on July 17, 2000

and no further action will be taken on

the proposed rule.

IV. Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order 12866

The Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) has exempted this regulatory

action from Executive Order 12866,

entitled ‘‘Regulatory Planning and

Review.’’

B. Executive Order 13132

Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,

1999) revokes and replaces Executive

Orders 12612, Federalism and 12875,

Enhancing the Intergovernmental

Partnership. Executive Order 13132

requires EPA to develop an accountable

process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and

timely input by State and local officials

in the development of regulatory

policies that have federalism

implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have

federalism implications’’ is defined in

the Executive Order to include

regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct

effects on the States, on the relationship

between the national government and

the States, or on the distribution of

power and responsibilities among the

various levels of government.’’ Under

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 17, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 31269

Executive Order 13132, EPA may not

issue a regulation that has federalism

implications, that imposes substantial

direct compliance costs, and that is not

required by statute, unless the Federal

government provides the funds

necessary to pay the direct compliance

costs incurred by State and local

governments, or EPA consults with

State and local officials early in the

process of developing the proposed

regulation. EPA also may not issue a

regulation that has federalism

implications and that preempts State

law unless the Agency consults with

State and local officials early in the

process of developing the proposed

regulation.

This rule will not have substantial

direct effects on the States, on the

relationship between the national

government and the States, or on the

distribution of power and

responsibilities among the various

levels of government, as specified in

Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,

August 10, 1999), because it merely

approves a state rule implementing a

federal standard, and does not alter the

relationship or the distribution of power

and responsibilities established in the

Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of

section 6 of the Executive Order do not

apply to this rule.

C. Executive Order 13045

Protection of Children from

Environmental Health Risks and Safety

Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),

applies to any rule that: (1) Is

determined to be ‘‘economically

significant’’ as defined under Executive

Order 12866, and (2) concerns an

environmental health or safety risk that

EPA has reason to believe may have a

disproportionate effect on children. If

the regulatory action meets both criteria,

the Agency must evaluate the

environmental health or safety effects of

the planned rule on children, and

explain why the planned regulation is

preferable to other potentially effective

and reasonably feasible alternatives

considered by the Agency.

This rule is not subject to Executive

Order 13045 because it does not involve

decisions intended to mitigate

environmental health or safety risks.

D. Executive Order 13084

Under Executive Order 13084,

Consultation and Coordination with

Indian Tribal Governments, EPA may

not issue a regulation that is not

required by statute, that significantly

affects or uniquely affects the

communities of Indian tribal

governments, and that imposes

substantial direct compliance costs on

those communities, unless the Federal

government provides the funds

necessary to pay the direct compliance

costs incurred by the tribal

governments. If the mandate is

unfunded, EPA must provide to the

Office of Management and Budget, in a

separately identified section of the

preamble to the rule, a description of

the extent of EPA’s prior consultation

with representatives of affected tribal

governments, a summary of the nature

of their concerns, and a statement

supporting the need to issue the

regulation.

In addition, Executive Order 13084

requires EPA to develop an effective

process permitting elected and other

representatives of Indian tribal

governments ‘‘to provide meaningful

and timely input in the development of

regulatory policies on matters that

significantly or uniquely affect their

communities.’’ Today’s rule does not

significantly or uniquely affect the

communities of Indian tribal

governments. Accordingly, the

requirements of section 3(b) of

Executive Order 13084 do not apply to

this rule.

E. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

generally requires an agency to conduct

a regulatory flexibility analysis of any

rule subject to notice and comment

rulemaking requirements unless the

agency certifies that the rule will not

have a significant economic impact on

a substantial number of small entities.

Small entities include small businesses,

small not-for-profit enterprises, and

small governmental jurisdictions.

This final rule will not have a

significant impact on a substantial

number of small entities because SIP

approvals under section 110 and

subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act

do not create any new requirements but

simply approve requirements that the

State is already imposing. Therefore,

because the Federal SIP approval does

not create any new requirements, I

certify that this action will not have a

significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities.

Moreover, due to the nature of the

Federal-State relationship under the

Clean Air Act, preparation of flexibility

analysis would constitute Federal

inquiry into the economic

reasonableness of state action. The

Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its

actions concerning SIPs on such

grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S.

EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42

U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).

F. Unfunded Mandates

Under section 202 of the Unfunded

Mandates Reform Act of 1995

(‘‘Unfunded Mandates Act’’), signed

into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must

prepare a budgetary impact statement to

accompany any proposed or final rule

that includes a Federal mandate that

may result in estimated annual costs to

State, local, or tribal governments in the

aggregate; or to private sector, of $100

million or more. Under section 205,

EPA must select the most cost-effective

and least burdensome alternative that

achieves the objectives of the rule and

is consistent with statutory

requirements. Section 203 requires EPA

to establish a plan for informing and

advising any small governments that

may be significantly or uniquely

impacted by the rule.

EPA has determined that the approval

action promulgated does not include a

Federal mandate that may result in

estimated annual costs of $100 million

or more to either State, local, or tribal

governments in the aggregate, or to the

private sector. This Federal action

approves pre-existing requirements

under State or local law, and imposes

no new requirements. Accordingly, no

additional costs to State, local, or tribal

governments, or to the private sector,

result from this action.

G. Submission to Congress and the

Comptroller General

The Congressional Review Act, 5

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small

Business Regulatory Enforcement

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides

that before a rule may take effect, the

agency promulgating the rule must

submit a rule report, which includes a

copy of the rule, to each House of the

Congress and to the Comptroller General

of the United States. EPA will submit a

report containing this rule and other

required information to the U.S. Senate,

the U.S. House of Representatives, and

the Comptroller General of the United

States prior to publication of the rule in

the Federal Register. A major rule

cannot take effect until 60 days after it

is published in the Federal Register.

This rule is not a ‘‘major’’ rule as

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

H. National Technology Transfer and

Advancement Act

Section 12 of the National Technology

Transfer and Advancement Act

(NTTAA) of 1995 requires Federal

agencies to evaluate existing technical

standards when developing a new

regulation. To comply with NTTAA,

EPA must consider and use ‘‘voluntary

consensus standards’’ (VCS) if available

31270 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 17, 2000 / Rules and Regulations

and applicable when developing

programs and policies unless doing so

would be inconsistent with applicable

law or otherwise impractical.

The EPA believes that VCS are

inapplicable to this action. Today’s

action does not require the public to

perform activities conducive to the use

of VCS.

I. Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of

this action must be filed in the United

States Court of Appeals for the

appropriate circuit by July 17, 2000.

Filing a petition for reconsideration by

the Administrator of this final rule does

not affect the finality of this rule for the

purposes of judicial review nor does it

extend the time within which a petition

for judicial review may be filed, and

shall not postpone the effectiveness of

such rule or action. This action may not

be challenged later in proceedings to

enforce its requirements. (See section

307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air

pollution control, Hydrocarbons,

Incorporation by reference,

Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen

dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and

recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur

oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

Dated: April 24, 2000.

Felicia Marcus,

Regional Administrator, Region IX.

Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code

of Federal Regulations is amended as

follows:

PART 52—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for Part 52

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F—California

2. Section 52.220 is amended by

adding paragraph (c)(159)(v)(E), revising

paragraph (c)(184) introductory text,

and adding paragraphs (c)(184)(i)(B)(9),

and (c) (222)(i)(A)(2) to read as follows:

§ 52.220 Identification of plan.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(159) * * *

(v) * * *

(E) Previously approved on July 12,

1990 and now deleted without

replacement for implementation in the

Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control

District Rules 1105 and 1117.

* * * * *

(184) New and amended regulations

for the following APCDs were submitted

on May 13, 1991, by the Governor’s

designee.

(i) * * *

(B) * * *

(9) Previously approved on August 11,

1992 and now deleted without

replacement for implementation in the

Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control

District Rule 1123.

* * * * *

(222) * * *

(i) * * *

(A) * * *

(2) Previously approved on July 14,

1995 and now deleted without

replacement for implementation in the

Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control

District Rule 1115.

* * * * *

3. Section 52.222 is being amended by

adding paragraphs (a)(6) and (b)(4) to

read as follows:

§ 52.222 Negative declarations.

(a) * * *

(6) Antelope Valley Air Pollution

Control District.

(i) Motor Vehicle Assembly Line

Coating Operations submitted on

January 12, 1999 and adopted on

November 18, 1997.

(ii) Refinery Process Turnarounds

submitted on February 16, 1999 and

adopted on November 18, 1997.

(iii) Marine Vessel Coating

Operations, Marine Tank Vessel

Operations, and Thermal Enhanced Oil

Recovery Wells submitted on June 23,

1998 and adopted on January 20, 1998.

* * * * *

(4) Antelope Valley Air Pollution

Control District.

(i) Boilers and Process Heaters In

Petroleum Refineries submitted on May

13, 1999 and adopted on April 21, 1998.

(ii) Cement Kilns and Glass Melting

Furnaces submitted on July 23, 1999

and adopted on March 16, 1999.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 00–11996 Filed 5–16–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 1

[CS Docket No. 97–98; FCC 00–116]

Rules and Policies Governing Pole

Attachments

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This document addresses

issues raised in the Notice of Proposed

Rulemaking relating to the formula used

to calculate maximum just and

reasonable rates utilities may charge for

pole attachments made to a pole, duct,

conduit or right-of-way pursuant. This

document amends the formula so that it

reflects the Commission’s current

accounting rules that apply to local

exchange carriers; clarifies the treatment

of accumulated depreciation attributable

to removal costs to eliminate negative

results; and adopts a conduit

methodology for determining the

maximum just and reasonable rates

utilities may charge cable systems and

telecommunications carriers for their

use of conduit systems.

DATES: Effective June 16, 2000, except

for §§ 1.1404 and 1.1409, which contain

information collection requirements that

have not been approved by the Office of

Management and Budget. The

Commission will publish a document in

the Federal Register announcing the

effective date of these sections. Written

comments by the public on any new

and/or modified information collection

requirements should be submitted on or

before July 17, 2000.

ADDRESSES: A copy of any comments on

the information collection requirements

contained herein should be submitted to

Judy Boley, Federal Communications

Commission, Room 1–C804, 445 12th

Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554 or

via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathleen Costello at (202) 418–7200 or

via the Internet at kcostell@fcc.gov, or

Cheryl King at (202) 418–2284 or via the

Internet at cking@fcc.gov. For additional

information concerning the information

collection requirements contained

herein, contact Judy Boley at (202) 418–

0214, or via the Internet at

jboley@fcc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a

summary of the Commission’s Report

and Order, CS Dkt. No. 97–98, FCC 00–

116, adopted March 29, 2000; released

April 3, 2000. The full text of the

Commission’s Report and Order is

available for inspection and copying

during normal business hours in the

FCC Reference Center (Room CY–A257)

at its headquarters, 445 12th Street, SW,

Washington DC 20554, or may be

purchased from the Commission’s copy

contractor, International Transcription

Service, Inc., (202) 857–3800, 1231 20th

Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036, or

may be reviewed via Internet at http://

www.fcc.gov/csb/.