alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1SECTION 302 CEO CERTIFICATIONRULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS     I, John E. Elliott, II, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Arcadia Resources, Inc.,certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arcadia Resources,Inc. (the “registrant”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) [omitted in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the
 

 
   registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Dated: February 14, 2007 /s/ John E. Elliott, II     John E. Elliott, II    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                 ---------------------------------------------

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lifen, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended November 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

        1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


Date: January 14, 2003           By:  /s/ James D. Durham
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                          James D. Durham
                                          Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7381

JAMES LEONARD ASH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LIEUTENANT OVERBY; W. J. TOWNLEY, Superintendent; W. P. ROGERS, Regional Director,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-97-747-2)

Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 31, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

District Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Leonard Ash, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under

28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. Ash v. Overby, No. CA-97-747-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 18,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT23





Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm









The Board
of Directors




Lance,
Inc.:




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Lance, Inc., No. 333-157482 on Form S-3 and No. 333-150931, No. 33-58839, No.
333-25539, No. 333-35646, No. 333-104960, No. 333-104961, No. 333-124472, and
No. 333-146336 of Lance, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated February 22, 2010,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Lance, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 26, 2009 and December 27, 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash
flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 26,
2009, and the related financial statement schedule “Valuation and Qualifying
Accounts,” and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of December 26, 2009, which report appears in the December 26, 2009 annual
report on Form 10-K of Lance, Inc.





As
discussed in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, the Company has
changed its method of accounting for business combinations effective December
28, 2008, due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Codification Subtopics 805
and 810-10.









/s/ KPMG
LLP





Charlotte,
North Carolina


February
22, 2010
entest_ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1

 





 

Agreement by and between David R. Koos and Entest BioMedical Inc. (“Agreement”)

 

WHEREAS, Entest BioMedical, Inc. (“ENTB”), a Nevada Corporation, wishes to  secure the services of David R. Koos (“Koos”) as  ENTB’s  President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)  

 

THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:

 

As consideration for entering into this Agreement, Koos shall be issued 2,000,000 of ENTB’s Common Stock (“Stock”) under the following terms and conditions:

 


	
  
	
A)
	
In the event that Koos voluntarily resigns as either President or CEO of ENTB prior to a date that is six months from issuance (“Vesting Date”) the Stock shall be returned to the Corporation.




 


	
  
	
B)
	
Koos will not offer to sell, sell, transfer, pledge or otherwise dispose of the Bonus Shares prior to the Vesting Date 




 

The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action to enforce this Agreement shall be brought in the state courts located in San Diego County, State of California.

 

AGREED TO BY:

 


	
ENTB
	
KOOS

	  	  
	
By: /s/David R. Koos
	
 /s/David R. Koos

	  	  
	
Name: David R. Koos
	  
	
Its: Chairman & CEO
	  
	  	  
	  	  
	
Date: August 8, 2009
	
Date: August 8, 2009
§ 1917.94 Foot protection. ( a ) The employer shall ensure that each affected employee wears protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects or objects piercing the sole.
( b ) ( 1 ) The employer must ensure that protective footwear complies with any of the following consensus standards: ( i ) ASTM F-2412-2005, “Standard Test Methods for Foot Protection,” and ASTM F-2413-2005, “Standard Specification for Performance Requirements for Protective Footwear,” which are incorporated by reference in § 1917.3;
( ii ) ANSI Z41-1999, “American National Standard for Personal Protection—Protective Footwear,” which is incorporated by reference in § 1917.3; or
( iii ) ANSI Z41-1991, “American National Standard for Personal Protection—Protective Footwear,” which is incorporated by reference in § 1917.3.
( 2 ) Protective footwear that the employer demonstrates is at least as effective as protective footwear that is constructed in accordance with one of the above consensus standards will be deemed to be in compliance with the requirements of this section.
[62 FR 40201, July 25, 1997, as amended at 74 FR 46359, Sept. 9, 2009]
#### BARNEY, BERKBIEGLER, Respondent, v. CAPE GIRARDEAU AND CHESTER RAILWAY CO., Appellant.

St. Louis Court of Appeals,

March 5, 1912.

1. SPRINGFIELD COURT OF APPEALS OPINION ADOPTED. The opinion of the Springfield Court of Appeals in this case (152 Mo. App. 543) is adopted as the opinion of the court.

2. APPELLATE PRACTICE: Reviewing Instructions: Necessity of Exception. An instruction will not be reviewed on appeal, where'no exception to the giving of the same was saved.

Appeal from Perry Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *Charles A. Killian,*Judge.

Affirmed.

*Qiboney Houck*and *Davis &. Hardesty*for appellant.

*Edward Robb*for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this case was prosecuted to this court, hut. was thereafter transferred by it to the Springfield Court of Appeals under the provisions of the act of the Legislature, approved June 12, 1909. [See Laws of Missouri 1909, p. 396; see also, Sec. 3939, R. S. 1909.] In due time the cause was disposed of by the Springfield Court of Appeals through an opinion prepared by Judge Cox of that court, as will appéar by reference to Berkbiegler v. Railroad, 152 Mo. App. 543, 133 S. W. 1170. Subsequently, the Supreme Court declared the said legislative act, which purported to authorize the transfer of cases from this court to the Springfield Court, to be unconstitutional. The cause was thereafter transferred by the Springfield Court of Appeals to this *442court on the theory that the jurisdiction of the appeal continued to reside here and the proceedings had in the Springfield Court with reference thereto were *coram non judice.*

The case has been argued and submitted here and duly considered. Upon reading the record and considering the arguments, we are persuaded that the opinion of the Springfield Court, above referred to, properly disposes of the controversy, and it is adopted as the opinion of this court. We do not, however, adopt and accept the reason given in that opinion for not reviewing the court’s action in giving instructions, that “the record does not show that any *objection*was made” to such giving of instructions. Our reasons for not reviewing the court’s action in that regard are that no *exception*was saved to the action of the court in giving instructions and that the defendant has in this court expressly waived the assignment of error based upon such action. For the reasons given in that opinion as modified by this one the judgment should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

All concur.
Promissory Note



 Exhibit 10.7 
 Promissory Note 
 On this date of October 7, 2009, in return for
valuable consideration received, the undersigned borrower promises to pay to Seatac Digital Resources, Inc., the “Lender”, the sum of One-Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of five percent
(5%) percent per annum. 
 Payable On Demand: The entire unpaid principal and accrued interest thereon, if any, shall become
immediately due and payable on demand by the holder of this Note. 
 Default - In the event of default, the borrower agrees to pay all
costs and expenses incurred by the Lender, including all reasonable attorney fees (including both hourly and contingent attorney fees as permitted by law) for the collection of this Note upon default, and including reasonable collection charges
(including, where consistent with industry practices, a collection charge set as a percentage of the outstanding balance of this Note) should collection be referred to a collection agency. 
 Acceleration of Debt - In the event that the borrower fails to make any payment due under the terms of this Note, or breach any condition relating to
any security, security agreement, note, mortgage or lien granted as collateral security for this Note, seeks relief under the Bankruptcy Code, or suffers an involuntary petition in bankruptcy or receivership not vacated within thirty (30) days,
the entire balance of this Note and any interest accrued thereon shall be immediately due and payable to the holder of this Note. 
 Modification - No modification or waiver of any of the terms of this Agreement shall be allowed unless by written agreement signed by both parties. No waiver of any breach or default hereunder shall be deemed a waiver of any
subsequent breach or default of the same or similar nature. 
 Transfer of the Note - The borrowers hereby waive any notice of the
transfer of this Note by the Lender or by any subsequent holder of this Note, agree to remain bound by the terms of this Note subsequent to any transfer, and agree that the terms of this Note may be fully enforced by any subsequent holder of this
Note. 
 Severability of Provisions - In the event that any portion of this Note is deemed unenforceable, all other provisions of this
Note shall remain in full force and effect. 
 Choice of Law - All terms and conditions of this Note shall be interpreted under the laws
of The State of California. 
 Dated: October 7, 2009 
  

	
	 /s/    Robert Cambridge

	America’s Minority Health Network, Inc.
	Borrower
###### Editorial Note on Part 1926

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

#### §§ 1926.433-1926.440 [Reserved]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Iowa�s forest resources in...**
 
1999
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009
2010 | 2011 | 2012
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.163/15:
Item Number:0084-N-15 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000589159
 
March 29, 2018
§ 29.813 Emergency exit access. ( a ) Each passageway between passenger compartments, and each passageway leading to Type I and Type II emergency exits, must be— ( 1 ) Unobstructed; and
( 2 ) At least 20 inches wide.
( b ) For each emergency exit covered by § 29.809(f), there must be enough space adjacent to that exit to allow a crewmember to assist in the evacuation of passengers without reducing the unobstructed width of the passageway below that required for that exit.
( c ) There must be access from each aisle to each Type III and Type IV exit, and ( 1 ) For rotorcraft that have a passenger seating configuration, excluding pilot seats, of 20 or more, the projected opening of the exit provided must not be obstructed by seats, berths, or other protrusions (including seatbacks in any position) for a distance from that exit of not less than the width of the narrowest passenger seat installed on the rotorcraft;
( 2 ) For rotorcraft that have a passenger seating configuration, excluding pilot seats, of 19 or less, there may be minor obstructions in the region described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, if there are compensating factors to maintain the effectiveness of the exit.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-12, 41 FR 55472, Dec. 20, 1976]
Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Torvec, Inc.
 March 29, 2011
    /s/ Richard A. KaplanRichard A. KaplanChief Executive Officer March 29, 2011
    /s/ Robert W. FishbackRobert W. FishbackChief Financial Officer Issuer Statement
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Crdentia Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, James D. Durham, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to myknowledge:

 

1.                                       the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the datesand for the periods indicated.

 

This Certification has not been, and shallnot be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 
| Date:  August 15, 2005 |   | By:                                   |   /S/  James  D. Durham |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        |   | James D.  Durham                      |
|                        |   | Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Cycle 0(CY1991) NLS tradestudies and analyses report.**
 
Books: One | Two
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.26:184471 | NAS 1.26:184472
Item Number:0830-H-14 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000946800
 
March 28, 2018
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-40362 of The Laclede Group, Inc. and Laclede Gas Company and
Registration Statement Nos. 333-86722 and 33-52357 of The Laclede Group,
Inc. and 333-86722-01 of Laclede Capital Trust I on Form S-3 and in
Registration Statement Nos. 333-90248, 333-90252, 333-90254, 333-91432,
333-102835 and 333-102836 of The Laclede Group, Inc. on Form S-8 of our
report dated November 18, 2003 (relating to the financial statements of The
Laclede Group, Inc.) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The
Laclede Group, Inc. and Laclede Gas Company for the year ended September 30,
2003.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-40362 of The Laclede Group, Inc. and Laclede Gas Company on Form S-3
of our report dated November 18, 2003 (relating to the financial statements
of Laclede Gas Company) appearing in Exhibit 99.1 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of The Laclede Group, Inc. and Laclede Gas Company for the year
ended September 30, 2003.

Deloitte & Touche
St. Louis, MO
November 21, 2003
NO. 07-12-00250-CV 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AT AMARILLO 

PANEL B 

JULY 5, 2012 

IN RE R. WAYNE JOHNSON, RELATOR 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 Relator R. Wayne Johnson, proceeding pro se, has filed a petition seeking a writ 

of mandamus compelling the respondent, the Honorable Edward L. Self, Judge of the 

242nd District Court of Castro County, to rescind an order dismissing a lawsuit Johnson 

filed in Castro County.1 According to Johnson, Judge Self abused his discretion by 

dismissing the suit because mandatory venue lay in another county. We previously 

denied Johnson’s mandamus relief for this same dismissal. In re Johnson, No. 07-11-

0433-CV, 2011 Tex. App. Lexis 8662 (Tex.App.--Amarillo Oct. 31, 2011, orig. 

proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.). We also affirmed the dismissal on Johnson’s 

appeal. Johnson v. Cornelius, No. 07-11-0091-CV, 2011 Tex. App. Lexis 7762 

(Tex.App.--Amarillo Sept. 28, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.). The contentions in his present 

 1 Johnson v. Cornelius, No. B9231-1011 (242nd Dist. Ct. Castro County, Tex. 

Jan. 13, 2011). 
2 

petition are variations on the same arguments he made in those proceedings. 

Johnson’s petition is denied. 

Per Curiam
#### § 1903.10 Consultation with employees.

Compliance Safety and Health Officers may consult with employees concerning matters of occupational safety and health to the extent they deem necessary for the conduct of an effective and thorough inspection. During the course of an inspection, any employee shall be afforded an opportunity to bring any violation of the Act which he has reason to believe exists in the workplace to the attention of the Compliance Safety and Health Officer.