alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officer of ProLink Holdings Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does
      hereby certify to his knowledge, that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Form
      10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information
      contained in the Form 10-Q fairly represents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the company.





Dated:
                August 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Lawrence D. BainLawrence
                D. BainChief
                Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1977.18 Arbitration or other agency proceedings. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) An employee who files a complaint under section 11(c) of the Act may also pursue remedies under grievance arbitration proceedings in collective bargaining agreements. In addition, the complainant may concurrently resort to other agencies for relief, such as the National Labor Relations Board. The Secretary's jurisdiction to entertain section 11(c) complaints, to investigate, and to determine whether discrimination has occurred, is independent of the jurisdiction of other agencies or bodies. The Secretary may file action in U.S. district court regardless of the pendency of other proceedings.
( 2 ) However, the Secretary also recognizes the national policy favoring voluntary resolution of disputes under procedures in collective bargaining agreements. See, e.g., *Boy's Markets, Inc.* v. *Retail Clerks,* 398 U.S. 235 (1970); *Republic Steel Corp.* v. *Maddox,* 379 U.S. 650 (1965); *Carey* v. *Westinghouse Electric Co.,* 375 U.S. 261 (1964); Collier Insulated Wire, 192 NLRB No. 150 (1971). By the same token, due deference should be paid to the jurisdiction of other forums established to resolve disputes which may also be related to section 11(c) complaints.
( 3 ) Where a complainant is in fact pursuing remedies other than those provided by section 11(c), postponement of the Secretary's determination and deferral to the results of such proceedings may be in order. See, *Burlington Truck Lines, Inc.,* v. *U.S.,* 371 U.S. 156 (1962).
( b ) *Postponement of determination.* Postponement of determination would be justified where the rights asserted in other proceedings are substantially the same as rights under section 11(c) and those proceedings are not likely to violate the rights guaranteed by section 11(c). The factual issues in such proceedings must be substantially the same as those raised by section 11(c) complaint, and the forum hearing the matter must have the power to determine the ultimate issue of discrimination. See *Rios* v. *Reynolds Metals Co.,* F.2d (5th Cir., 1972), 41 U.S.L.W. 1049 (Oct. 10, 1972); *Newman* v. *Avco Corp.,* 451 F.2d 743 (6th Cir., 1971).
( c ) *Deferral to outcome of other proceedings.* A determination to defer to the outcome of other proceedings initiated by a complainant must necessarily be made on a case-to-case basis, after careful scrutiny of all available information. Before deferring to the results of other proceedings, it must be clear that those proceedings dealt adequately with all factual issues, that the proceedings were fair, regular, and free of procedural infirmities, and that the outcome of the proceedings was not repugnant to the purpose and policy of the Act. In this regard, if such other actions initiated by a complainant are dismissed without adjudicatory hearing thereof, such dismissal will not ordinarily be regarded as determinative of the section 11(c) complaint.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

VICKIE L. JEANS,

Respondent

v.

B. BRAUN MEDICAL INC., A 

PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, B. 

BRAUN INTERVENTIONAL SYSTEMS 

INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND 

B. BRAUN MEDICAL S.A.S., A FRENCH 

CORPORATION,

Petitioners

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 25 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of May, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### § 102.162 Examination and copying of records related to the claim; opportunity for full explanation of the claim.

Following receipt of the demand letter specified in § 102.161, and in conformity with Agency guidelines governing such requests, the debtor may request to examine and copy publicly available records pertaining to the debt, and may request a full explanation of the Agency's claim.
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.201 Signaling. ( a ) *Flaggers.* Signaling by flaggers and the use of flaggers, including warning garments worn by flaggers, shall conform to Part 6 of the MUTCD (incorporated by reference, see § 1926.6).
( b ) *Crane and hoist signals.* Regulations for crane and hoist signaling will be found in applicable American National Standards Institute standards.
[44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979; 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, as amended at 67 FR 57736, Sept. 12, 2002; 78 FR 35567, June 13, 2013; 84 FR 21577, May 14, 2019]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

11 a.m., Friday, June 16, 2000.

# PLACE:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Surveillance Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb, 

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-12360  Filed 5-12-00; 11:31 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5

<S>                               <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                26,437
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                         37,037
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                          363,354
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     363,354
<PP&E>                               586,967
<DEPRECIATION>                        50,273
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     1,048,681
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                558,560
<BONDS>                              902,324
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                          100,000
<COMMON>                             204,200
<OTHER-SE>                           217,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       1,048,681
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        478,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       4,830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    (478,651)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (473,821)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                        (473,821)
<EPS-BASIC>                            .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .02



</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 25]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33092]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Part 252

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Technical 
Amendments

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is making technical amendments to the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to correct the clause list 
and associated clause dates in the clause ``Contract Terms and 
Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders 
Applicable to Defense Acquisitions of Commercial Items.''

DATES: Effective Date: January 3, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy G. Williams, Defense 
Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP/DARS, Room 3B855, 3060 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Telephone 703-602-0328; 
facsimile 703-602-0350.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DoD is making technical amendments to the 
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to add 
Alternate II in paragraph (b)(11)(iii) and to correct clause dates in 
paragraphs (b)(11) and (b)(14) of the clause at 252.212-7001, Contract 
Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders 
Applicable to Defense Acquisitions of Commercial Items. These errors 
occurred as a result of the final rule DFARS Case 2009-D012, published 
in the Federal Register on December 29, 2010.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 252

    Government procurement.

Clare M. Zebrowski,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
    Therefore, 48 CFR part 252 is amended as follows:

PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 252 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR chapter 1.

PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

0
2. Amend section 252.212-7001 as follows:

252.212-7001  [Amended]

0
a. Revise the clause date in paragraph (b)(11)(i) by removing ``(DEC 
2010)'' and adding in its place ``(NOV 2009)'';
0
b. Revise the clause date in paragraph (b)(11)(ii) by removing ``(DEC 
2010)'' and adding in its place ``(SEP 2008)'';
0
c. Add paragraph (b)(11)(iii);
0
d. Revise the clause date in paragraph (b)(14)(i) by removing ``(JUL 
2009)'' and adding in its place ``(DEC 2010)''; and
0
e. Revise the clause date in paragraph (b)(14)(ii) by removing ``(DEC 
2010)'' and adding in its place ``(JUL 2009)'';
    The revision reads as follows:

252.212-7001  Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement 
Statutes or Executive Orders Applicable to Defense Acquisitions of 
Commercial Items.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (11) * * *
    (iii) ---- Alternate II (DEC 2010) of 252.225-7001.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2010-33092 Filed 12-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Exhibit
13.1










PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with this Annual Report of Ultrapetrol (Bahamas) Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Felipe
Menendez Ross, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)                 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)                 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not
for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date:
March 30, 2010





/s/ Felipe Menendez
Ross


Felipe
Menendez Ross


Principal
Executive Officer
§ 1960.71 Agency annual reports. ( a ) The Act and E.O. 12196 require all Federal agency heads to submit to the Secretary an annual report on their agency's occupational safety and health program, containing such information as the Secretary prescribes. ( 1 ) Each agency must submit to the Secretary by May 1 of each year a report describing the agency's occupational safety and health program of the previous calendar year and objectives for the current fiscal year. The report shall include a summary of the agency's self-evaluation finding as required by § 1960.78(b).
( 2 ) The Secretary must provide the agencies with the guidelines and format for the reports at the time they are requested.
( 3 ) The agency reports will be used in preparing the Secretary's report to the President.
( b ) The Secretary will submit to the President by January 1 of each year a summary report of the status of the occupational safety and health of Federal employees based on agency reports, evaluations of individual agency progress and problems in correcting unsafe or unhealthful working conditions, and recommendations for improving their performance.
[69 FR 68804, Nov. 26, 2004, as amended at 78 FR 47190, Aug. 5, 2013]
#### Frank Thall, an Infant, by John H. Snyder, his Guardian *ad litem,*Resp’t, *v.*John A. Carme, App’lt.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,*

*Filed May 18, 1889.)*

1. Master and servant—Duty to instruct servant.

When a master engages a young and inexperienced servant, and places-him in a place of latent or obscure danger, it is the duty of the master to instruct the servant how to do the work and howto be on his guard against danger, and he is liable for injuries occasioned by failure to give such instructions.

2. Same—Eeizlow servants.

It is no defense to an action for such injuries that plaintiff was acting at the time of the accident under the orders of a fellow servant, for whose negligence the master could not he held responsible, and it is proper to charge in such case that if the instructions required by law from an employee would have sufficed to put the plaintiff on his guard against the negligent orders of the fellow servant, and would have prevented the accident, a recovery might be had for the negligence of the master.

Appeal from a *judgment of the*circuit court of *Kings-*county in favor of the plaintiff.

*Beltz & Large,*for app’lt; *I. S. Catlin,*for resp’t.

Pratt, J.

The circuit judge correctly charged the jury that when a master engages an inexperienced servant, especially if of tender years and presumed ignorance, and places him in a place of latent or obscure danger, it is the duty of the master to instruct the servant how to do the work, and at the same time be on his guard against the danger.

Tested by that rule, the motions for nonsuit and for dismissal of the complaint were properly denied.

The master did not claim that he had personally given the instructions the rule required. And the jury might well find that such instructions as were testified to did not meet the exigencies of the danger.

The jury may well have thought that telling a lad to be careful, was not adequate instruction. Great stress is laid by appellant upon the, fact that the lad was injured while acting under the orders of Ward, a fellow servant, for whose negligence the employee cannot be held responsible. But the recovery did not proceed upon the ground of Ward’s negligence. The jury were carefully instructed that for such negligence no recovery could be had. They were also instructed that if the instructions which the law required from an employer in such circumstances would have sufficed to put the lad on his guard against the negligent orders of Ward, and would have thereby prevented the accident, a recovery might be had for the negligence of the employer. In this there was no error.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

All concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12413]



[[Page 31318]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 12, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Regions Financial Corporation, Birmingham, Alabama; to merge 
with Heritage Bancorp, Inc., Hutto, Texas, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Texas Heritage Bank, Hutto, Texas.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Three Rivers Bankshares, Inc., Fort Gibson, Oklahoma; to become 
a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Fort Gibson Bancshares, Inc., Fort Gibson, Oklahoma, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Fort Gibson State Bank, Fort Gibson, Oklahoma.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 12, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-12413 Filed 5-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<PAGE> 1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 21


PARENTS AND SUBSIDIARIES

     The Company and its subsidiaries<F*> as of June 30, 1997 are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      State (Country) of   Percentage of Voting
Name of Company                         Incorporation        Securities Owned
---------------                       ------------------   --------------------
<S>                                   <C>                          <C>
Kellwood Company                      Delaware                     Parent
American Recreation Products, Inc.    Delaware                      100%
Kellwood Asia Limited                 Hong Kong                     100%
Smart Shirts Limited                  Hong Kong                     100%
Keeta Company Limited                 Hong Kong                     100%
South Asia Garment Limited            Hong Kong                     100%
KWD Holdings, Inc.                    Delaware                      100%
Robert Scott & David Brooks
  Outlet Stores, Inc.                 Delaware                      100%
Tri-W Corporation                     North Carolina                100%
Halmode Apparel, Inc.                 Delaware                      100%
David Dart, Inc.                      California                    100%
Force One, Inc.                       California                    100%


<FN>
<F*> Some of the above subsidiaries also have subsidiaries which are not listed
because, in the aggregate, they are not considered to be significant.
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








In
      connection with the annual report of Berry Plastics Holding Corporation (the
      “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ira
      G. Boots, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.











/s/
      Ira G. Boots


Ira
      G.
      Boots


President
      and Chief Executive Officer





Date:  March
      12,
      2007
[No. 20174-1-III.

Division Three.

December 12, 2002.]

#### James C. Ropp, et al., *Appellants,*v. Spokane County, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 99-2-04810-0, Kathleen M. O’Connor, J., entered April 13, 2001. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, J., concurred in by Sweeney and Schultheis, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

DERRICK ROBINSON, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 637 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.