alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 2.6


<TABLE>
<S>                          <C>                        <C>                            <C>
[LOGO] Industry Canada       Industrie Canada           ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION         RAPPORT DE LA TRANSACTION
                                                               REPORT                         ELECTRONIQUE

       Canada Business       Loi canadienne sur les    ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT            CLAUSES MODIFICATRICES
       Corporations Act      societes par actions      (SECTIONS 27 OR 177)             (SECTIONS 27 OU 177)
</TABLE>


Processing Type - Mode de traitement:       E-Commerce/Commerce-E

1.    Name of Corporation -                   Corporation No. -
      Denomination de la societe              No de la societe

      IQ Power Technology Inc.                    309945-8


3.   The articles of the  above-named  corporation  are amended as follows:
     Les statuts de la societe  mentionnee  ci-dessus  sont modifies de la facon
     suivante:

     Pursuant to s. 173(1)(b) of the Canada Business Corporations Act, Article 2
     is amended to provide that the registered office of the Corporation must be
     in the Province of British Columbia, Canada.

     Pursuant to s. 173(1)(o) of the Canada Business Corporations Act, Article 7
     is amended to provide that a meeting of shareholders of the Corporation may
     be held at a place  outside  of Canada in any of the  following  countries:
     Germany, the United States of America, and Barbados.





================================================================================

Date          Name-Nom             Signature            Capacity of - en qualite

2002-07-22    GREGORY A. SASGES                         AUTHORIZED OFFICER
================================================================================

                                                                     Page 1 of 1


                                                                          CANADA
#### § 39.23 May I fly my aircraft to a repair facility to do the work required by an airworthiness directive?

Yes, the operations specifications giving some operators authority to operate include a provision that allow them to fly their aircraft to a repair facility to do the work required by an airworthiness directive. If you do not have this authority, the local Flight Standards District Office of FAA may issue you a special flight permit unless the airworthiness directive states otherwise. To ensure aviation safety, FAA may add special requirements for operating your aircraft to a place where the repairs or modifications can be accomplished. FAA may also decline to issue a special flight permit in particular cases if we determine you cannot move the aircraft safely.
#### Krewson Estate

*Elmer L. Menges,*for Anna Krewson, executor.

*Conrad G. Moffett,*for J. Carrell Krewson, executor and claimant.

March 10, 1958.

Taxis, P. J.,

The first and final

account of Anna Krewson and J. Carrell Krewson, executors, was examined and audited by the court on January 31, 1958 . . .

One other matter is presented for determination, and that is the question of whether the bill for funeral expenses of decedent in the sum of $577, paid by the *402son, the said J. Carrell Krewson in accordance with the direction of the will, is allowable as a debt and deduction for inheritance tax purposes. Item 5 of the will gives a life estate to the widow in 108 Krewson Terrace, Willow Grove, and then provides: “Upon the death or remarriage of my said wife, I give, devise and bequeath the said premises 108 Krewson Terrace, Willow Grove, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, unto my son, J. Carrell Krewson, his heirs and assigns forever. I direct that my son, J. Carrell Krewson, shall pay all of my funeral expenses, together with all estate, transfer and inheritance taxes both State and Federal upon any and all gifts in this my Last Will and Testament.”

The Transfer Inheritance Tax Act of June 20,1919, P. L. 521, 72 PS §2301, sec. 2, as amended, reads in part as follows:

> “. . . the only deduction to be allowed from the gross values of such estates by the Register of Wills shall be the debts of the decedent, reasonable and customary funeral expenses, [others] . . .”

In Christensen Estate, 11 D. *&*C. 2d 485, Judge Hunter of the Philadelphia Orphans’ Court decided that the fair amount of a reasonable funeral bill is deductible for inheritance tax purposes regardless of partial reimbursement for funeral expenses by the social security death benefit payment. In the course of the opinion, he referred to Mellor’s Estate, 286 Pa. 149, where the Supreme Court allowed a deduction of the funeral expenses of a deceased married woman although decedent’s surviving husband was primarily liable for this obligation. At page 152, the Supreme Court said:

> “. . . the Legislature in determining what deductions it would allow before assessing the tax said in explicit terms that the allowance should be made for *403‘reasonable and customary funeral expenses’ and placed no other limitation thereon.”

Applying the same reasoning to the present case, it follows that a deduction for reasonable and customary funeral expenses should be allowed, regardless of payment of these expenses by decedent’s son pursuant to the condition in the will attached to his devise in remainder. Accordingly a deduction for the full amount of the funeral expenses totaling $577 is hereby allowed....

And now, March 10, 1958, this adjudication is confirmed nisi.
#### § 1602.8 Penalty for making of willfully false statements on report.

The making of willfully false statements on Report EEO-1 is a violation of the United States Code, title 18, section 1001, and is punishable by fine or imprisonment as set forth therein.

[31 FR 2833, Feb. 17, 1966]
§ 1921.10 Appearances. ( a ) *Representation.* The parties may appear in person or by counsel. The term “counsel” means a member in good standing of the bar of a Federal Court or of the highest court of any State or Territory of the United States.
( b ) *Failure to appear.* In the event that a party appears at the hearing and no party appears for the opposing side, the party who is present shall have an election to present his evidence in whole or such portion thereof sufficient to make a prima facie case before the hearing examiner. Failure to appear at a hearing shall not be deemed to be a waiver of the right to be served with a copy of the hearing examiner's decision and to file exceptions thereto.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of approval of amendment to Tribal-State Compact. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. § 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish, in the                         **Federal Register**                        , notice of approved Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, has approved an Amendment, executed on May 2, 2000, to the Gaming Compact between the Tunica-Biloxi Indian Tribe of Louisiana and the State of Louisiana.                     

# DATES:

This action is effective May 12, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George T. Skibine, Director, Office of Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066. 

Dated: May 3, 2000. 

Kevin Gover, 

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 00-11941 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
#### § 18.606 [Reserved]
# EUR-Lex - 31999D0180 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999D0180

**1999/180/EC: Commission Decision of 23 February 1999 recognising that the production of certain quality wines psr in Germany is, by reason of their qualitative characteristics, far from able to satisfy demand (notified under document number C(1999) 391) (Only the German text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 059 , 06/03/1999 P. 0029 - 0031 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 23 February 1999 recognising that the production of certain quality wines psr in Germany is, by reason of their qualitative characteristics, far from able to satisfy demand (notified under document number C(1999) 391) (Only the German text is authentic) (1999/180/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 of 16 March 1987 on the common organisation of the market in wine (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1627/98 (2), and in particular Article 6(1) thereof,

Whereas, in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 6(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 822/87, all new planting of vines is prohibited until 31 August 2000; whereas, however, there is provision for Member States to grant authorisation for new vine plantings for the 1996/97 and/or 1997/98 and/or 1998/1999 wine years for areas intended for the production of:

- quality wines produced in specified regions (quality wines psr), and

- table wines designated as one of the following: 'Landwein`, 'vin de pays`, 'indicazione geografica tipica`, 'vino de la tierra`, 'vinho regional`, 'regional wine`, etc,

for which the Commission has recognised that production by reason of their qualitative characteristics, is far from able to satisfy demand;

Whereas Germany submitted requests to apply that provision to certain regions on 20 November 1998 and 11 January 1999; whereas its requests cover all the new planting authorisations available for the period 1996/97 to 1998/1999;

Whereas examination of the requests has revealed that the quality wines psr in question meet the requisite conditions; whereas the limit of 289 ha laid down by the Regulation for the period 1996/97 to 1998/1999 has not been exceeded;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Wine,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The quality wines psr listed in the Annex meet the requirements of the second subparagraph of Article 6(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 822/87, provided that, for all the quality wines psr of the same region, the increase in surface area given in that Annex is complied with.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.

Done at Brussels, 23 February 1999.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 84, 27. 3. 1987, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 210, 28. 7. 1998, p. 8.

ANNEX

>TABLE>
#### The State *against*James Shinn.

on certiorari.

After insolyent applies for discharge, the law is re-^e^lfter01 wards dis-void, *(a)*

THIS writ was prosecuf ed by *Joshua G. Harkcr,*and was directed to the Common Pleas of *Monmouth,*to remove . . . the judgment, order, petition, and proceedings given and made, upon the-application of the defendant for the benefit of the insolvent laws of the state. By the return, it appears that he presented his petition to the court on the 27th of *January*1818 ; that the proceedings were had in the usual manner, and that the final hearing upon the application took place on the 12th of *March*1818, on which day he was discharged by the court. In the month of *February,*after the application and before the discharge, the legislature passed a law, repealing the one then in force, for the benefit of insolvent debtors, and containing no clause, saving the benefit of such applications as had been previously made.

The reason assigned and relied on, for setting aside the order and discharge, was in the following words. “ Because the acts of the legislature, under which the application of the said *James Shinn,*was made to the said court in the term of *January*1818, were afterwards and before the 12th day of *March*1818, when the said order of discharge was made, repealed and not in force on the day last aforesaid, by reason whereof the said order was and is wholly unauthorised, illegal, and void.”

*Ewing*for the prosecution.

(a)

**See *Den. James vs. Dubois, 1 Har. 286. Hunt vs. Gulick, 4 Hal. 208.*

The court,

after argument, did order and adjudge, that the order of the said Court of Common Pleas of the county of *Monmouth,*for the discharge of said *Shinn*from confinement as an insolvent debtor, and the discharge of said *Shinn,*to be set aside.
§ 1952.15 Nevada. ( a ) The Nevada State plan received initial approval on January 4, 1974.
( b ) The Nevada State plan received final approval on April 18, 2000.
( c ) Under the terms of the 1978 Court Order in *AFL-CIO* v. *Marshall,* compliance staffing levels (benchmarks) necessary for a “fully effective” enforcement program were required to be established for each State operating an approved State plan. In July 1986 Nevada, in conjunction with OSHA, completed a reassessment of the levels initially established in 1980 and proposed revised compliance staffing benchmarks of 11 safety and 5 health compliance officers. After opportunity for public comment and service on the AFL-CIO, the Assistant Secretary approved these revised staffing requirements on September 2, 1987.
( d ) The plan covers all private-sector employers and employees, with several notable exceptions, as well as State and local government employers and employees, within the State. For current information on these exceptions and for additional details about the plan, please visit *http://www.osha.gov/dcsp/osp/stateprogs/nevada.html .*
October 1, 2015 RE: Response to rejection ofSection 333 exemption request Docket FAA-2015-2514

Great Bend Coop in our request for exemptions would like to clarify that itwould be ofgreat public interestfor acceptance ofour Section 333 exemption
.We feel the eBee is extremely safe, being it is very light and efficient and having an electric motor is also very economically safe on the environment. It is very efficient allowing us to be more productive in our benefits to growers. Using the eBee we can efficiently decide where fertilizer applications should be placed and limit any run-offwhich in turn helps the environment. Great Bend Coop could see great growthwith the approval ofour request. The growth could open more jobs in the area and aide in the current unemployment struggle the nation is battling. Ifyou have any further questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you foryour consideration ofthis matter
. Respectfully submitted, JuniorWelsch

JuniorWelsch Crop Production Operations Director

GREAT BEND COOP ASSOCIATION 323 So 281 Hwy, Great Bend, KS 67530 Office: 620-793-5031 Toll Free: 888-892-5031 Fax: 620-792-8003 Cell: 620-282-2640

Email: jrwelsch@coop.kscoxmail.com
Adcote L 76

- 186/CR

- 385 December 2011 Page 2 of 4

Safety, Handling and Storage

 Store in cool, dry, well

- ventilated area away from heat and ignition sources. Keep container tightly

closed.

 Hot organic chemical vapors can suddenly and without warning combust when mi xed with air.

Ignition can occur at typical elevated temperature process conditions. Please evaluate such

processes to assure safe handling conditions.

 Support and ground containers before opening, dispensing, mixing, pouring, or emptying. Open with

non

- sparking tools. If container is warm, open bung slowly to release the internal pressure.

 Wash thoroughly after handling. Wash contaminated goggles, face shield, and gloves.

Professionally launder contaminated clothing before re

- use.

 ATTENTION! Contain er can be hazardous when empty. Follow label warnings even after container

is empty. Do not use heat, sparks, open flames, torches, or cigarettes on or near empty containers.

Do not reuse empty container without professional cleaning.

 Refer to Material Safety Data Sheet for more information.

Alcohol and similar materials containing active hydrogen can react with Adcote L 76

- 186 adhesive causing

inadequate cure.

Adcote L 76

- 186 can react or interact with other components of laminations. Retained solvents, slip

additives, antiblock agents, and contaminated solvents are some of the components that may cause

property changes of the film and/or adhesive.

Recommended Application Conditions

Application Method Direct gravure

Application Cylinder 110

- 150 line

Ap plication Solids 35

- 40 %

Dry Adhesive Weight 1.25

- 3.5 lb /ream

Drying Web Temperature 150

- 180  F

Laminating Temperature 150

- 220  F

Cure Time 3

- 5 days at 70  F

Slitting/Rewinding Time 4

- 8 hours at 70  F

Cleaning Solvent Methyl Ethyl Ketone or Ethyl AcetateAdcote L 76

- 186/CR

- 385 December 2011 Page 3 of 4



### 12 13 

### 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Seconds, Zahn # 2



## Per Cent Solids



# Adcote L 76

- 186/CR

- 385, Zahn # 2

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Viscosity (cPs)



## Per Cent Solids



# Adcote L 76

- 186/CR

- 385 Brookfield

Brookfield, #2/100 rpm, 25 ° CAdcote L 76

- 186/CR

- 385 December 2011 Page 4 of 4

Adcote is a registered trademark of Rohm and Haas Company.

These suggestions and data are based on information we believe to be reliable. They are offered in good faith, but without g uarantee, as

conditions and method of use of our products are beyond our control. We recommend that the prospective user determine the suitability o f

our materials and suggestions before adopting them on a commercial scale.

Suggestions for uses of our products or the inclusion of descriptive material from patents and the citation of specific patents in this

publication should not be understood as recommending the use of our products in violation of any patent or as permission or l icense to use

any patents of the Rohm and Haas Co mpany.
#### § 1915.1010 Benzidine.

Note:

The requirements applicable to shipyard employment under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1003 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-1910.1003).

[[61 FR 31430](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31430), June 20, 1996]
#### § 102.137 Public observation of Board meetings.

Every portion of every meeting of the Board will be open to public observation, except as provided in § 102.139, and Board Members will not jointly conduct or dispose of Agency business other than in accordance with the provisions of this subpart.
o ~ Q~ c ~

~ 

## cn ~

~ ~ C)
~ 

# 0 W ~ :3 (Q

~

~ a3 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~

M:

C~ D (
~ D ~ 

### 3 `G O — X CD ~G 3 ~ CD CD 1
~ _ m W `V

~ (D 

### N cc

~ 

### O - 

# 63 - ~ 

# g = D Nc '

~ 

# D 00 _W (D W~ 

# = Oo c N X 0 0 CD

~ * CD i N 0° ~ n CO `G ~ ~ 

## W 

# 2 O

~ 

## . ~c~n`~~ ~ 

### U? O ~ 

### ~ 0 

### ~ ~ O ~ ,m
~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ c U~ 

### _ O' 2 cD CD (D —
~ cn cD 

## " o O X + ~ 

### O l< m 

### N (p O (p N ~ 

### CJl 77 -` cQ ~W 

### C51 ~ 

### O 77 (Q



### CD

~ 0 ~ 

### O ~ 

# O O O 0 0
~ ~ N ~ W O 

### C b O- ~ i C3i ~ ~ - ~ ' ` O ~. ~ 

### ~ O C 

### ~ .CD

. - 

### U?—O ,

~ 

## CD 

# O O O O O O ~ ~ ~ W 

### J C3l 

## N ~ ~ J
~ 

# \~ )

O

~ (D 

### CD ~ CY) 00 4
~ 1 v W 

## CD N 

## N ~

~ n ~ ~ ~

~ 

### G ~ r-r
§ 1960.56 Training of safety and health specialists. ( a ) Each agency shall provide occupational safety and health training for safety and health specialists through courses, laboratory experiences, field study, and other formal learning experiences to prepare them to perform the necessary technical monitoring, consulting, testing, inspecting, designing, and other tasks related to program development and implementation, as well as hazard recognition, evaluation and control, equipment and facility design, standards, analysis of accident, injury, and illness data, and other related tasks.
( b ) Each agency shall implement career development programs for their occupational safety and health specialists to enable the staff to meet present and future program needs of the agency.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1235]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Bioengineering and Environmental 
Systems; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Bioengineering and Environmental 
Systems (1189).
    Date/Time: March 1-2, 2000; 8 am-5 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Rooms 360 
and 380, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Janice M. Jenkins, Program Director, Biomedical 
Engineering and Research to Aid Persons with Disabilities, Division 
of Bioengineering and Environmental Systems, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: 
(703) 306-1318.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Biomedical Engineering proposals 
as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and person 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 13, 2000.
Karen York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-1235 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M