alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31997R2301 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31997R2301

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2301/97 of 20 November 1997 on the entry of certain names in the 'Register of certificates of specific character' provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92 on certificates of specific character for agricultural products and foodstuffs (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 319 , 21/11/1997 P. 0008 - 0009 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2301/97 of 20 November 1997 on the entry of certain names in the 'Register of certificates of specific character` provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92 on certificates of specific character for agricultural products and foodstuffs (Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92 of 14 July 1992 on certificates of specific character for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 9 (1) thereof,

Whereas, in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92, the Member States have forwarded to the Commission applications for the registration of certain names as certificates of special character;

Whereas the names so registered are entitled to use the endorsement 'traditional speciality guaranteed` which is reserved for them;

Whereas no declaration of objection within the meaning of Article 9 of the Regulation has been sent to the Commission as a result of the publication of the names in question in the Official Journal of the European Communities (2);

Whereas, as a result, those names may be entered in the 'Register of certificates of specific character` and therefore be protected throughout the Community as guaranteed traditional specialities,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The names in the Annex hereto are hereby entered in the 'Register of certificates of specific character`, as provided for in Article 9 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 November 1997.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 208, 24. 7. 1992, p. 9.

(2) OJ C 21, 21. 1. 1997, p. 5.

ANNEX

- Vieille Kriek, Vieille Kriek-Lambic, Vieille Framboise-Lambic, Vieux fruit-Lambic/Oude Kriek, Oude Kriekenlambiek, Oude Frambozenlambiek, Oude Fruit-lambiek (Article 13 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92),

- Vieille Gueuze, Vieille Gueuze-Lambic, Vieux Lambic/Oude Geuze, Oude Geuze-Lambiek, Oude Lambiek (Article 13 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92),

- Faro (Article 13 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety to such financial statements (in thousands, except per
share data)
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          15,427
<SECURITIES>                                     8,813
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (648)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,236
<PP&E>                                           8,467
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,856)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,337
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,178
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,515
<SALES>                                         11,563
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,563
<CGS>                                            4,886
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,518
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 396
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,559)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,559)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,559)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Section 302 Certifications for the Signatures**

 

I,Anthony J. Gould Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Chief AccountingOfficer, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Western Sierra Bancorp(the “Registrant”);

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors:

 

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  May 10, 2004                     |
|-----------------------------------------|
|                                    |
|                                    | /s/ Anthony J. Gould |   |
| Chief Financial and  Accounting Officer |

 

----
§ 1915.117 Qualifications of operators. Paragraphs (a) and (d) of this section shall apply to ship repairing and shipbuilding only. Paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section shall apply to ship repairing, shipbuilding and shipbreaking. ( a ) When ship's gear is used to hoist materials aboard, a competent person shall determine that the gear is properly rigged, that it is in safe condition, and that it will not be overloaded by the size and weight of the lift.
( b ) Only those employees who understand the signs, notices, and operating instructions, and are familiar with the signal code in use, shall be permitted to operate a crane, winch, or other power operated hoisting apparatus.
( c ) No employee known to have defective uncorrected eyesight or hearing, or to be suffering from heart disease, epilepsy, or similar ailments which may suddenly incapacitate him, shall be permitted to operate a crane, winch or other power operated hoisting apparatus.
( d ) No minor under eighteen (18) years of age shall be employed in occupations involving the operation of any power-driven hoisting apparatus or assisting in such operations by work such as hooking on, loading slings, rigging gear, etc.
# EUR-Lex - 32000D0272 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000D0272

**2000/272/EC: Commission Decision of 24 March 2000 approving the programme of new olive-tree planting in France (notified under document number C(2000) 807) (Only the French text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 085 , 06/04/2000 P. 0035 - 0035 *

Commission Decision

of 24 March 2000

approving the programme of new olive-tree planting in France

(notified under document number C(2000) 807)

(Only the French text is authentic)

(2000/272/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1638/98 of 20 July 1998 amending Regulation No 136/66/EEC on the establishment of a common organisation of the market in oils and fats(1), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2366/98 of 30 October 1998 laying down detailed rules for the application of the system of production aid for olive oil for the 1998/1999, 1999/2000 and 2000/2001 marketing years(2), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1273/1999(3), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1638/98 provides that no aid under the common organisation of the market in oils and fats in force from 1 November 2001 may be paid to live growers in respect of additional olive trees and the relevant areas planted after 1 May 1998 and those not covered by a cultivation declaration at a date to be determined. However, pursuant to the same Article, additional olive trees planted in connection with the conversion of old olive plantations and new plantings on areas covered by programmes approved by the Commission may be taken into account within certain limits to be determined.

(2) Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1638/98 provides for a programme to be approved by the Commission covering 3500 ha in France.

(3) The French national programme of new plantings forwarded on 29 June 1999 by the French authorities to the Commission for approval contains the information specified in Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2366/98. The programme covers the whole area provided for in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1638/98.

(4) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Oils and Fats,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The French national programme for new planting of 3500 hectares of olive groves provided for in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1638/98 is hereby approved.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the French Republic.

Done at Brussels, 24 March 2000.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 210, 28.7.1998, p. 32.

(2) OJ L 293, 31.10.1998, p. 50.

(3) OJ L 151, 18.6.1999, p. 12.
# EUR-Lex - 31999R1823 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999R1823

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1823/1999 of 20 August 1999 determining the sensitive production areas and/or the groups of high-quality varieties exempt from application of the quota buyback programme in raw tobacco **

*
Official Journal L 221 , 21/08/1999 P. 0005 - 0005 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1823/1999

of 20 August 1999

determining the sensitive production areas and/or the groups of high-quality varieties exempt from application of the quota buyback programme in raw tobacco

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 660/1999(2), and in particular Article 14a thereof,

(1) Whereas, pursuant to Article 34(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 of 22 December 1998 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 as regards the premium scheme, production quotas and the specific aid to be granted to producer groups in the raw tobacco sector(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1373/1999(4), the Commission must determine, on the basis of proposals from the Member States, which sensitive production areas and/or groups of high-quality varieties, up to a maximum of 25 % of each Member State's guarantee threshold, are to be exempt from application of the quota buyback programme;

(2) Whereas, at the request of certain Member States, these groups of high-quality varieties should be determined;

(3) Whereas, because Article 35(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 stipulates that the Member State must make publics its intention to sell from 1 September so that other producers may buy the quota before it is actually bought back, this Regulation must apply from 31 August 1999,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities of groups of high-quality varieties exempt from quota buyback for the 1999 harvest are as follows:

>TABLE>

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 31 August 1999.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 August 1999.

For the Commission

Karel VAN MIERT

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 215, 30.7.1992, p. 70.

(2) OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 10.

(3) OJ L 358, 31.12.1998, p. 17.

(4) OJ L 162, 26.6.1999, p. 47.
#### DET. CINCI. COACH LINE v. P. U. C.

Ohio Supreme Court.

No. 21067.

Decided Dec. 12, 1928.

MARSHALL, J.

AUTOMOBILES.

,(50P2b). Where a common carrier by motor vehicle operating over state highways in interstate commerce habitually violates reasonable and lawful rules and regulations of the public utilities commission of the state, carries passengers in intrastate service without a certificate authorizing the same and violates the laws of the state regulating the speed of motor vehicles on the state highways, all such violations being committed in such manner and to such extent as would justify a revocation of the certificate of an operator, the certificate theretofore’ granted to such operator by the public utilities commission to operate as a common carrier in interstate commerce may be revoked.

Day; Allen, Kinkade, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.
EPA ICR No.: 1669.06; OMB Control No.: 2070-0158

Attachment 1

Section 406 of the Toxic Substances Control Act

15 U.S.C. 2686
Sec. 2686 Lead hazard information pamphlet

(a) Lead hazard information pamphlet 

Not later than 2 years after October 28, 1992, after notice and opportunity for comment, the Administrator of the 

Environmental Protection Agency, in consultation with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and with 

the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall publish, and from time to time revise, a lead hazard information 

pamphlet to be used in connection with this subchapter and section 4852d of Title 42. The pamphlet shall –

(1) contain information regarding the health risks associated with exposure to lead; 

(2) provide information on the presence of lead-based paint hazards in federally assisted, federally owned, 

and target housing; 

(3) describe the risks of lead exposure for children under 6 years of age, pregnant women, women of 

childbearing age, persons involved in home renovation, and others residing in a dwelling with lead-based 

paint hazards; 

(4) describe the risks of renovation in a dwelling with lead-based paint hazards; 

(5) provide information on approved methods for evaluating and reducing lead-based paint hazards and 

their effectiveness in identifying, reducing, eliminating, or preventing exposure to lead-based paint hazards; 

(6) advise persons how to obtain a list of contractors certified pursuant to this subchapter in lead-based 

paint hazard evaluation and reduction in the area in which the pamphlet is to be used; 

(7) state that a risk assessment or inspection for lead-based paint is recommended prior to the purchase, 

lease, or renovation of target housing; 

(8) state that certain State and local laws impose additional requirements related to lead-based paint in 

housing and provide a listing of Federal, State, and local agencies in each State, including address and 

telephone number, that can provide information about applicable laws and available governmental and 

private assistance and financing; and

(9) provide such other information about environmental hazards associated with residential real property as 

the Administrator deems appropriate. 

(b) Renovation of target housing 

Within 2 years after October 28, 1992, the Administrator shall promulgate regulations under this subsection to 

require each person who performs for compensation a renovation of target housing to provide a lead hazard 

information pamphlet to the owner and occupant of such housing prior to commencing the renovation.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1926

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.56 Illumination.

(a) *General.* Construction areas, ramps, runways, corridors, offices, shops, and storage areas shall be lighted to not less than the minimum illumination intensities listed in Table D-3 while any work is in progress:

| Foot-candles | Area or operation |
| --- | --- |
| 5 | General construction area lighting. |
| 3 | General construction areas, concrete placement, excavation and waste areas, accessways, active storage areas, loading platforms, refueling, and field maintenance areas. |
| 5 | Indoors: warehouses, corridors, hallways, and exitways. |
| 5 | Tunnels, shafts, and general underground work areas: (Exception: minimum of 10 foot-candles is required at tunnel and shaft heading during drilling, mucking, and scaling. Bureau of Mines approved cap lights shall be acceptable for use in the tunnel heading.) |
| 10 | General construction plant and shops (e.g., batch plants, screening plants, mechanical and electrical equipment rooms, carpenter shops, rigging lofts and active storerooms, barracks or living quarters, locker or dressing rooms, mess halls, and indoor toilets and workrooms). |
| 30 | First aid stations, infirmaries, and offices. |

Table D-3—Minimum Illumination Intensities in Foot-Candles

(b) *Other areas.* For areas or operations not covered above, refer to the American National Standard A11.1-1965, R1970, Practice for Industrial Lighting, for recommended values of illumination.
#### § 262.7 Processing fee.

A carrier may retain a processing fee for issuing the travel voucher or credit, as long as the fee is on a per-passenger basis and the existence and amount of the fee is clearly and prominently disclosed to consumers at the time they purchased the airfare.
#### THURMAN v DAYTON (city)

Ohio Appeals, 2nd Dist, Montgomery Co.

No 815.

Decided Nov. 28, 1928

Egan & Delscamp, Dayton, for Thurman.

Lon Volz, Dayton, for City.

BY THE COURT

We are of the opinion that this would correct the search warrant and that as issued by the Judge, it would not be invalid.

The officers in making the search, according to their testamony, found quite a party of men and women in the home of Thurman, ,and they were drinking. They found a number of bottles in the basement which had previously contained liquor, and in some of the bottles there was liquor still remaining. The officers thereupon went to the first floor and found a trap under the window and after prying upon the trap with screw drivers, they found one bottle of corn whiskey, which was appropriated by the officers.

Immediately upon finding this liquor, the daughter of plaintiff in error, a girl of 19 years of age, sat with her knees on a chair looking toward where the officers *405were at work and she exclaimed that the officers were planting liquor. Plaintiff in error, Thurman, thereupon saw the officer, as he claims, in the act of planting liquor. There was a row in which the Thurmans, father and son, participated. Plaintiffs were thereupon arrested upon the charge of possession of intoxicating liquors ,and also upon the charge of resisting an officer. They were fined $350 and costs upon the first charge, and $20 and costs upon the second.

It is urged by the plaintiff in error that there is no evidence to prove trafficking of intoxicating liquors, but only its possession, and it is claimed that this is not an offense in a private residence.

We are of the opinion, however, that as the officers testified there must have been liquor consumed by the party as they noticed on all their breaths, the presence of liquor. We think, therefore, the house was not one which would protect plaintiff in error in the use thereof for the purpose of entertaining the various people who were there.

We are therefore of opinion that there was evidence sufficient to justify the magistrate in convicting the defendants, and sufficient to justify the Court of Common Pleas in affirming that judgment.

Ferneding, Kunkle and Allread, JJ, concur.