alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 99.41 General.

The airspace above the areas described in this subpart is established as an ADIZ. The lines between points described in this subpart are great circles except that the lines joining adjacent points on the same parallel of latitude are rhumb lines.

[69 FR 16756, Mar. 30, 2004]
Promissory Note

$45,000.00			May 31, 2002
				Jersey City, New Jersey

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Robert J. Warshaw, hereby
unconditionally promises to pay to the order of OptiMark Inc.
(the "Payee") at the Payee's office at 10 Exchange Place, Jersey
City, New Jersey, on May 31, 2003, the principal amount of forty
five thousand dollars ($45,000.00), together with interest on
the unpaid principal amount hereof, at a rate per annum equal to
six percent (6%).  This Note may be prepaid in whole or in part,
without premium or penalty, at any time and from time to time
upon one business day's irrevocable written notice to Payee,
provided that the accrued and unpaid interest on the principal
amount prepaid must be paid with any such prepayment.

The undersigned represents and warrants that this Note has been
executed and delivered by, and constitutes and will continue to
constitute the legal, valid, binding and enforceable obligation
of, the undersigned.

Unless the holder hereof shall notify the undersigned to the
contrary, the unpaid principal amount hereof, all accrued
interest hereon, and all other amounts payable hereunder shall
become immediately due and payable without further notice,
protest, presentment, demand or other formalities of any kind,
all of which are hereby expressly waived by the undersigned, if
ay of the following events shall occur and be continuing: (a)
the undersigned shall be unable or admit in writing his
inability to pay his debts as they mature, or shall make a
general assignment for the benefit of his creditors; or (b) a
custodian, trustee, receiver, agent or similar officer shall be
appointed for the undersigned or any substantial part of his
property; or (c) the undersigned shall be adjudicated a bankrupt
or insolvent; or (d) a petition in bankruptcy or a petition
seeking reorganization or an arrangement with creditors, or to
take advantage of any bankruptcy, insolvency or similar law,
shall be filed by or against the undersigned, and if filed
without the undersigned's consent or acquiescence, is not
dismissed within 60 days; or (e) any representation or warranty
made by the undersigned in or in connection with this Note shall
be or become untrue; or (f) the undersigned shall cease to be an
employee of Payee due to a termination of employment  by Payee
as a result of (i) the conviction of the undersigned of a
felony, (ii) engaging in conduct by the undersigned which
constitutes willful gross neglect or willful gross misconduct in
carrying out his duties resulting, in either case, in material
economic harm to Payee or its affiliates; or (g) the
undersigned's voluntary termination of employment by Payee.

All payments under this Note shall be made in lawful money of
the United States of America, and in immediately available
funds, free and clear of and without any set-off, counterclaim,
deduction or withholding.  The undersigned promises to pay costs
of collection and reasonable attorneys' fees in case default is
made in payment of this Note.

This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the laws of the State of New York.

Robert J. Warshaw


/s/ Robert J. Warshaw
______________________
#### In the Matter of the Application of The People of the State of New York, by George S. Van Schaick, as Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, for an Order to Take Possession of the Property and Liquidate the Business of the Lexington Surety and Indemnity Company. The People of the State of New York, Appellant; George S. Van Schaick, as Superintendent of Insurance, Respondent.

Submitted March 15, 1937;

decided March 23, 1937.

Motion for reargument or to amend the remittitur denied, without costs. The question of preference was not before the court for decision. (See 272 N, Y. 210.)
#### § 1650.114 Refunds.

Amounts paid, or deducted by salary offset, by an employee for a debt that is waived or otherwise not found owing to the United States will be refunded promptly to the employee. Refunds do not bear interest unless required by law or contract.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 19

- 12135 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:18

- cr
- 20919

- JEM

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus

DAMION HAWTHORNE , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

________________________ (March 1 3 , 2020)
Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge , GRANT, and LUCK , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 19-12135 Date Filed: 03/13/2020 Page: 1 of 22 Bonnie Phillips

- Williams , appointed counsel for Damion Hawthorne in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

t he relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED , and Hawthorne’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 19-12135 Date Filed: 03/13/2020 Page: 2 of 2
§ 1471.350 What must I do if I learn of information required under § 1471.335 after entering into a covered transaction with the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service? At any time after you enter into a covered transaction, you must give immediate written notice to the FMCS office with which you entered into the transaction if you learn either that— ( a ) You failed to disclose information earlier, as required by § 1471.335; or
( b ) Due to changed circumstances, you or any of the principals for the transaction now meet any of the criteria in § 1471.335.
#### § 1472.115 Does this part affect the Federal contracts that I receive?

It will affect future contract awards indirectly if you are debarred or suspended for a violation of the requirements of this part, as described in § 1472.510(c). However, this part does not apply directly to procurement contracts. The portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 that applies to Federal procurement contracts is carried out through the Federal Acquisition Regulation in chapter 1 of Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations (the drug-free workplace coverage currently is in 48 CFR part 23, subpart 23.5).
#### § 1400.735-19 Influencing Members of Congress.

No money appropriated to the Service shall be used by any employee of the Service to pay for any personal service, printed or written matter, or other devices intended to influence any Member of Congress regarding any legislation or appropriation before the Congress.
#### § 27.673 Primary flight control.

Primary flight controls are those used by the pilot for immediate control of pitch, roll, yaw, and vertical motion of the rotorcraft.

[Amdt. 27-21, 49 FR 44434, Nov. 6, 1984]
§ 1912.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part prescribes the policies and procedures governing the composition and functions of advisory committees which have been, or may be, appointed under section 7(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (the Act) to assist the Assistant Secretary in carrying out the standards-setting duties of the Secretary of Labor under section 6 of the Act. Such committees are specifically authorized by section 7(b). This part also prescribes the policies and procedures governing the composition and functions of the: ( 1 ) Advisory Committee on Construction Safety and Health; and
( 2 ) Maritime Advisory Committee on Occupational Safety and Health.
( b ) The policies and practices herein are intended to reflect those expressed in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) and will be applied in a manner consistent with the Act, Office of Management and Budget Circular A-63, “Committee Management”, and the Department of Labor's general rules under that Act which are published in part 15 of this title.
[38 FR 28035, Oct. 11, 1973, as amended at 85 FR 73423, Nov. 18, 2020]
§ 1470.31 Real property. ( a ) *Title.* Subject to the obligations and conditions set forth in this section, title to real property acquired under a grant or subgrant will vest upon acquisition in the grantee or subgrantee respectively.
( b ) *Use.* Except as otherwise provided by Federal statutes, real property will be used for the originally authorized purposes as long as needed for that purposes, and the grantee or subgrantee shall not dispose of or encumber its title or other interests.
( c ) *Disposition.* When real property is no longer needed for the originally authorized purpose, the grantee or subgrantee will request disposition instructions from the awarding agency. The instructions will provide for one of the following alternatives: ( 1 ) *Retention of title.* Retain title after compensating the awarding agency. The amount paid to the awarding agency will be computed by applying the awarding agency's percentage of participation in the cost of the original purchase to the fair market value of the property. However, in those situations where a grantee or subgrantee is disposing of real property acquired with grant funds and acquiring replacement real property under the same program, the net proceeds from the disposition may be used as an offset to the cost of the replacement property.
( 2 ) *Sale of property.* Sell the property and compensate the awarding agency. The amount due to the awarding agency will be calculated by applying the awarding agency's percentage of participation in the cost of the original purchase to the proceeds of the sale after deduction of any actual and reasonable selling and fixing-up expenses. If the grant is still active, the net proceeds from sale may be offset against the original cost of the property. When a grantee or subgrantee is directed to sell property, sales procedures shall be followed that provide for competition to the extent practicable and result in the highest possible return.
( 3 ) *Transfer of title.* Transfer title to the awarding agency or to a third-party designated/approved by the awarding agency. The grantee or subgrantee shall be paid an amount calculated by applying the grantee or subgrantee's percentage of participation in the purchase of the real property to the current fair market value of the property.
#### [638] The Supervisors of Sullivan County *and*Alpheus Dimmick, district attorney.

A *district attorney*is not entitled to charge, in his hill of services rendered, a *subpoena ticket*besides a *subpanu*for each witness.

Nor is he entitled to a fee on the usual motion for judgment after a verdict of guilty, or for arguing in relation to the sentence where the court has a discretion as to the extent of the punishment.

Questions submitted by consent, as on appeal from the taxation of the district attorney’s bill of costs.

*By the Court,*

Bronson, J.

The taxed bill, in addition to a subpoena, contains a charge of twenty-five cents for a subpoena ticket for each witness. It is convenient for the witness in criminal as well as in civil cases to have a ticket or brief note, stating the time and place when and where he is required to appear, and the indictment or complaint upon which he is required to give his testimony: but the practice of delivering a ticket in criminal cases has not been uniformly followed in this state, nor is it necessary for the purpose of compelling the attendance of the witness. The district attorney may issue a subpoena, without the seal of the court, (2 *R. S.*729, § 63;) and by the fee bill, *(p.*751,) he is allowed one subpoena for each witness; but no allowance is made for a ticket. The district attorney refers to 2 *R. S.*400, § 42, to prove that a ticket must be delivered to the witness: but by referring to the title of chapter 7, in which the section is contained, (p. 386,) it will be seen that this provision relates to proceedings in *civil*cases. The mode of compelling the attendance of witnesses in *284
      *criminal*cases is prescribed at page 729, already referred to. Although the tickets were issued they were not “ necessarily prepared,” and should have been disallowed by the taxing officer.

[539] The bill also contains charges for motion fees for sentences against criminals Where the defendant *pleads*guilty, the district attorney is entitled to a fee of $1.25 for calling and examining witnesses, and arguing as to the sentence; and he is entitled to a like fee for arguing every special motion actually made after notice actually given. But after a *verdict*of guilty, the district attorney is not entitled to a fee on the usual motion for judgment, or for arguing in relation to the sentence where the court has a discretion about the extent of the punishment. These are not special motions after notice within the meaning of the fee bill.

Both of these questions have been before the court, and been decided in relation to the bills of other district attorneys.
#### § 36.105 Flight Manual Statement of Chapter 4 equivalency.

For each airplane that meets the requirements for Stage 4 certification, the Airplane Flight Manual or operations manual must include the following statement: “The following noise levels comply with part 36, Appendix B, Stage 4 maximum noise level requirements and were obtained by analysis of approved data from noise tests conducted under the provisions of part 36, Amendment 36 (insert part 36 amendment to which the airplane was certificated). The noise measurement and evaluation procedures used to obtain these noise levels are considered by the FAA to be equivalent to the Chapter 4 noise level required by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) in Annex 16, Volume I, Appendix 2, Amendment 7, effective March 21, 2002.”.

[Amdt. 36-26, 70 FR 38749, July 5, 2005; 70 FR 41610, July 20, 2005; FAA Doc. No. FAA-2015-3782, Amdt. No. 36-31, 82 FR 46129, Oct. 4, 2017]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROBERT ALLEN EVANS,

Appellant,

v.

COLETTE EVANS,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-2053

[July 6, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County; Dale C. Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE 10-007036.

David M. Scott of Law Office of David Scott, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellant.

Nancy W. Gregoire Stamper of Birnbaum, Lippman & Gregoire, PLLC, 

Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### MARINO v YOUNGSTOWN (City)

Ohio Appeals, 7th Dist, Mahoning Co

Decided March 8, 1929

Nathan Kaufman, Youngstown, for Marino.

W. B. Spagnola, Youngstown, for city.

*457PARR, J.

The record does not disclose that any person other than Marino had access to the barn, nor was it rented to any one else. Valley, was the owner of the property, and it is not disputed in the testimony, had rented the building or garage to Marino. He says that Marino put a lock on the basement door and there were larger sliding doors to the garage also locked, and by which it was entered. Marino does not deny that he rented the garage or that h» put a lock upon the door. He does deny, however, that he owned the liauor. He admits that the Nash coupe belongs to him but denies all knowledge of the liquor save and except that he admits that there were two one-gallon empty containers upon the seat of his automobile. He indicates, however, that some one had broken into the garage. It will be noted that the building, was locked by Marino, who must have had the key, and it is hardly probable that any one else put the liquor in the garage.

The testimony of Callan, the prohibition inspector, is corroborated by Carney, a policeman, and O’Hara, a detective of the City of Youngstown, and also by Metcalfe chief of the vice squad. The testimony of Marino is not corroborated by anyone save and except one witness by the name of Prank, who says that Marino is a man of good character, a fruit dealer.

It was upon this testimony that the Municipal Court found the accused guilty, and certainly upon a review of the same, this court could not well say that it is so clearly and manifestly against the weight of the evidence that the judgment should be reversed. Therefore, the Municipal Court was warranted u- finding the accused guilty. He had rented a garage some two or three days before, he was paying, the rent, he was the owner of the Nash coupe where the liquor was found, he admitted that two empty containers were on the seat of is automobile. He was in full possession of the garage, he no doubt had the key, he no doubt had been using his car. He does not attempt to sav that anyone else had placed these containers in the automobile, and therefore, the trial court was warranted in finding. the accused guilty.

The judgments of the Municipal Court and the Court of Common Pleas are affirmed and the cause remanded to the Municipal Court of the City of Youngstown for execution of sentence.

Pollock and Roberts*. JJ, concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated financial statements of Tower Financial Corporation for
the nine months ended September 30, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       4,601,734
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       3,287,547
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            24,580,229
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 15,625,800
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    135,037,528
<ALLOWANCE>                                (2,024,509)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             183,105,303
<DEPOSITS>                                 160,232,403
<SHORT-TERM>                                   530,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            941,623
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,530,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,871,277
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             183,105,303
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,904,843
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              595,564
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             1,179,659
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             8,680,066
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,591,293
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,601,763
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,078,303
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                1,015,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,696,742
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 86,319
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      86,319
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    86,319
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.86
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              3,397,848
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,009,509
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,024,509
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,024,509
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
# Sincerely CBIC Control Number 

# p. 1



# 363102

RECEIVED

OPPT CEIC

2014 DEC 23 Ail II: 

# 16

DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts

Chambers Works

Deepwater, NJ 08023



# December 17, 2014

Director, Chemical Control Division

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

EPA East

Room 4146

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20004

Re: EPA — HQ — OPPT — 2003 - 0012

DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100

PFOA Data Submittal — Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples



# November 2014 Sample Data

Dear Chemical Control Division:

Attached please find summaries of PFOA analytical results for the DuPont Chambers Works

weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A in November 2014. In accordance with

the current site NJPDES permit (NJ0005100, effective September 2011), these results are

provided to NJDEP on a monthly basis via electronic discharge monitoring reports. The

enclosures include two paper and two electronic copies of the analytical results from this

monitoring period.

Am ha Jeyarajasingam

Area Manager-Secure Environmental Treatment

DuPont Chambers Works

AJ/cic

Enclosures 

# iaii9114

# Copy to:

Document Control Office

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

EPA East

Room 6428

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20460

Ms. Susan Rosenwinkel (cover letter only)

Principal Environmental Engineer

NJDEP Division of Water Quality

Bureau of Water Surfacing

Mail Code 401-02B

401 E. State Street

P.O. Box 420

Trenton, NJ 08625-0420 p. 2

# P. 3Ploy01ug/L =microgramsperLiterIrepresentasingleanalysis,exceptforthesamplecollectedon11/2/14 

# ci

: I

F

_I11/24/14 

# 0036-Z



# r 0(idd)LumpJedspedJoJamJedsweJ6oJo!Lu=1/6h1Era-G—w3-fruz.I.m.I 

# 0039.ILOQ=limitof quantification=0.100ug/L)I662-GRABI11/10/14 

# 0LTOIPFOA=Perfluorooctanol1662-GRABIt4/em.SampleID-GM(u) doi(ll)wouog



# (1)suun



# i

J



# cVOAdIaucipliw<and ND =Nondetectatstated reportinglimit
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration
[HCFA-3029-WN]


Medicare Program; Cancellation of the Meeting of the Medical and 
Surgical Procedures Panel of the Medicare Coverage Advisory Committee--
January 19 and 20, 2000

AGENCY: Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS.

ACTION: Notice of meeting cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the cancellation of the January 19 and 
20, 2000 meeting of the Medical and Surgical Procedures Panel of the 
Medicare Coverage Advisory Committee (MCAC).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Constance A. Conrad, Executive 
Secretary, 410-786-4631.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces the cancellation of 
the January 19 and 20, 2000 meeting of the Medical and Surgical 
Procedures Panel of the MCAC. Notice of the meeting was given on 
December 13, 1999 (64 FR 69538). The meeting will be rescheduled and 
announced in a subsequent Federal Register notice.

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. App. 2, section 10(a)(1) and (a)(2).

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.774, 
Medicare--Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)

    Dated: December 14, 1999.
Jeffrey L. Kang,
Director, Office of Clinical Standards and Quality, Health Care 
Financing Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-123 Filed 1-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P