alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4636 

To revise the treatment of urbanized areas experiencing population changes 

following a major disaster. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2020 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Mr. WARNER, and Mr. KAINE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To revise the treatment of urbanized areas experiencing 

population changes following a major disaster. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Giving Relief to Amer5 ican Communities in Emergencies Act’’ or the ‘‘GRACE 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. URBANIZED AREAS. 

8 (a) EXTENSION OF TREATMENT OF URBANIZED

9 AREAS.—Section 21101 of division B of the Bipartisan 

10 Budget Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–123; 132 Stat. 103) 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4636 IS

1 is amended by striking ‘‘and 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘2020, 

2 2021, and 2022’’. 

3 (b) CENSUS DISCRETION.—Section 5324 of title 49, 

4 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(f) CENSUS DISCRETION.— 

7 ‘‘(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection— 

8 ‘‘(A) the term ‘disaster-related population 

9 decrease’, with respect to an urbanized area, 

10 means that— 

11 ‘‘(i) the population of the urbanized 

12 area decreases to be less than 50,000 indi13 viduals, as determined in a decennial cen14 sus after the decennial census in which the 

15 area was designated as an urbanized area; 

16 and 

17 ‘‘(ii) the decrease described in clause 

18 (i) is a result of a major disaster declared 

19 by the President under section 401 of the 

20 Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 

21 Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

22 5170); and 

23 ‘‘(B) the term ‘urbanized area’ means an 

24 area designated in a decennial census as an ur25 banized area by the Secretary of Commerce. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4636 IS

1 ‘‘(2) ELECTION.—Upon request by the Gov2 ernor of a State in which an urbanized area that ex3 periences a disaster-related population decrease is lo4 cated, the Secretary of Transportation may elect for 

5 the purposes of this chapter, including for purposes 

6 of making apportionments under this chapter, to— 

7 ‘‘(A) use the population of the urbanized 

8 area, as determined in the decennial census be9 fore the most recent decennial census; and 

10 ‘‘(B) continue to treat the area as an ur11 banized area.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### WILL-O-WAY DEVELOPMENT CO v MILLS

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9933.

Decided May 6, 1929

Thorman & Goldman, Cleveland, for Development Co.

F Morton, Cleveland, for Mills.

SULLIVAN, J.

It is contended by able counsel for the plaintiff in error that, under the case of Woloveck et al vs. Schueler, 19 Ohio App. Rep. 210, the Company has a cause of action in the form of the statement of claim. It seems, however, that a demurrer was filed on the ground that the allegations were not sufficient to constitute a cause of action and the demurrer was sustained and this ruling of the lower court is here to be adjudged as a question of error.

It is conceded that there has been no tender of a deed conveying, the title to the purchaser. We think this settles the vital question in the case and is deter*329minative of all others because one of the fundamental propositions of the law is that in case of contracts, no matter what form the procedure takes, full performance must be alleged and proven. That is axiomatic. It is an Anomaly in the law to insist upon full performance, even in the form of the present case, of the terms of the contract on the part of the vendee and not on the part of the vendor. The suit was for the balance due upon the contract. It may or may not be collectible. If it is collectible and the money is recovered, of course, there should be a conveyance by deed and a delivery thereof in order to insure title. The present status of the case leaves that question in the air and undisposed of, and thus no real security to the purchaser of the property against whom the judgment has been entered. The eventuality might be, under such circumstances, the retention of the ownership of the land by the vendor and the purchase price thereof, and a thing which would be highly inequitable and legally impossible.

Hence, it is our judgment that the court below was correct in its ruling in sustaining the demurrer, and it is for the reason herein noted that we affirm the judgment of the court below.

Vickery, PJ, and Levine, J, concur.
§ 1905.25 Discovery. ( a ) *Depositions.* ( 1 ) For reasons of unavailability or for other good cause shown, the testimony of any witness may be taken by deposition. Depositions may be taken orally or upon written interrogatories before any person designated by the presiding hearing examiner and having power to administer oaths.
( 2 ) *Application.* Any party desiring to take the deposition of a witness may make application in writing to the presiding hearing examiner, setting forth: ( i ) The reasons why such deposition should be taken;
( ii ) The time when, the place where, and the name and post office address of the person before whom the deposition is to be taken;
( iii ) The name and address of each witness; and
( iv ) The subject matter concerning which each witness is expected to testify.
( 3 ) *Notice.* Such notice as the presiding hearings examiner may order shall be given by the party taking the deposition to every other party.
( 4 ) *Taking and receiving in evidence.* Each witness testifying upon deposition shall be sworn, and the parties not calling him shall have the right to cross-examine him. The questions propounded and the answers thereto, together with all objections made, shall be reduced to writing, read to the witness, subscribed by him, and certified by the officer before whom the deposition is taken. Thereafter, the officer shall seal the deposition, with two copies thereof, in an envelope and mail the same by registered mail to the presiding hearing examiner. Subject to such objections to the questions and answers as were noted at the time of taking the deposition and would be valid were the witness personally present and testifying, such deposition may be read and offered in evidence by the party taking it as against any party who was present, represented at the taking of the deposition, or who had due notice thereof. No part of a deposition shall be admitted in evidence unless there is a showing that the reasons for the taking of the deposition in the first instance exist at the time of hearing.
( b ) *Other discovery.* Whenever appropriate to a just disposition of any issue in a hearing, the presiding hearing examiner may allow discovery by any other appropriate procedure, such as by written interrogatories upon a party, production of documents by a party, or by entry for inspection of the employment or place of employment involved.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4648 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to list isotonitazene as a schedule 

I controlled substance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2020 

Mr. COTTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to list isotonitazene 

as a schedule I controlled substance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SCHEDULING OF ISOTONITAZENE. 

4 Schedule I of section 202(c) of the Controlled Sub5 stances Act (21 U.S.C. 812(c)) is amended by adding at 

6 the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(e) Unless specifically exempted or unless listed in 

8 another schedule, any material, compound, mixture, or 

9 preparation which contains any quantity of N,N-diethyl10 2-(2-(4 isopropoxybenzyl)-5-nitro-1H-benzimidazol-1- 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4648 IS

1 yl)ethan-1-amine, or which contains its isomers, esters, 

2 ethers, salts, and salts of isomers, esters, and ethers, 

3 whenever the existence of such isomers, esters, ethers, and 

4 salts is possible within that specific chemical designa5 tion.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
§ 1910.424 SCUBA diving. ( a ) *General.* Employers engaged in SCUBA diving shall comply with the following requirements, unless otherwise specified.
( b ) *Limits.* SCUBA diving shall not be conducted: ( 1 ) At depths deeper than 130 fsw;
( 2 ) At depths deeper than 100 fsw or outside the no-decompression limits unless a decompression chamber is ready for use;
( 3 ) Against currents exceeding one (1) knot unless line-tended; or
( 4 ) In enclosed or physically confining spaces unless line-tended.
( c ) *Procedures.* ( 1 ) A standby diver shall be available while a diver is in the water.
( 2 ) A diver shall be line-tended from the surface, or accompanied by another diver in the water in continuous visual contact during the diving operations.
( 3 ) A diver shall be stationed at the underwater point of entry when diving is conducted in enclosed or physically confining spaces.
( 4 ) A diver-carried reserve breathing gas supply shall be provided for each diver consisting of: ( i ) A manual reserve (J valve); or
( ii ) An independent reserve cylinder with a separate regulator or connected to the underwater breathing apparatus.
( 5 ) The valve of the reserve breathing gas supply shall be in the closed position prior to the dive.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 31, 2018

No. 04-16-00406-CR

Carl Wade BAILES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR0076

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

The panel has considered the appellant’s motion for rehearing, and the motion is 

DENIED.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 31st day of January, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court
#### § 101.31 Initiation of proceedings to hear and determine jurisdictional disputes under section 10(k).

The investigation of a jurisdictional dispute under section 10(k) is initiated by the filing of a charge, as described in § 101.2, by any person alleging a violation of paragraph (4)(D) of section 8(b). As soon as possible after a charge has been filed, the Regional Director serves on the parties a copy of the charge together with a notice of the filing of such charge.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 30, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 30, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A25D0029. QUINTERRIOUS TURNER v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 19SC173776
#### UNITED STATES v. CLIFTON MANUFACTURING CO.

[Ante, p. 525;

302 U. S. 720]

Petition, for writ of certiorari *denied*by Supreme Court October 11, 1937.
§ 1915.57 Uses of fissionable material in ship repairing and shipbuilding. The provisions of this section apply to ship repairing and shipbuilding only. ( a ) In activities involving the use of and exposure to sources of ionizing radiation not only on conventionally powered but also on nuclear powered vessels, the applicable provisions of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Standards for Protection Against Radiation (10 CFR part 20), relating to protection against occupational radiation exposure, shall apply.
( b ) Any activity which involves the use of radiocative material, whether or not under license from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, shall be performed by competent persons specially trained in the proper and safe operation of such equipment. In the case of materials used under Commission license, only persons actually licensed, or competent persons under direction and supervision of the licensee, shall perform such work.
SERVED: FEBRUARY 18, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

INTHEMATTEROF 

SCHUMAN AVIATION COMPANY, LTD. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013-1080 

RECEIVED 

F::3 2 0 2014 

HEARiNG DOCKET 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012WPI30065) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. ' ',,1 / .... -•"''" ----., 

/ / ........ j/~) 

/k,___~'y(s;:: -:p~ 

Ronnie A. Yoder .. )' 

Chief Administrative LawJudge . 

/ 

Attachment - Service List ~-~-e'""'·"___./" 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Gustav Richard Schuman, President 

Schuman Aviation Company, Ltd., Respondent 

130 Iolana Place 

Ho!lolulu, HI 96819 

TEL: NOT PROVIDED 

FAX: NOT PROVIDED 

Christopher D. Ferrara, Respondent's Counsel 

3555 Harding Avenue, Suite 2F 

Honolulu, HI 96816 

TEL: NOT PROVIDED 

FAX: 808-522-1661 

Don Bobertz, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, Western Pacific Region, A WP-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-3454 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-1080 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building--Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
§ 91.861 Base level. ( a ) *U.S. Operators.* The base level of a U.S. operator is equal to the number of owned or leased Stage 2 airplanes subject to § 91.801(c) of this subpart that were listed on that operator's operations specifications for operations to or from airports in the contiguous United States on any one day selected by the operator during the period January 1, 1990, through July 1, 1991, plus or minus adjustments made pursuant to paragraphs (a) (1) and (2). ( 1 ) The base level of a U.S. operator shall be increased by a number equal to the total of the following— ( i ) The number of Stage 2 airplanes returned to service in the United States pursuant to § 91.855(f);
( ii ) The number of Stage 2 airplanes purchased pursuant to § 91.855(g); and
( iii ) Any U.S. operator base level acquired with a Stage 2 airplane transferred from another person under § 91.863.
( 2 ) The base level of a U.S. operator shall be decreased by the amount of U.S. operator base level transferred with the corresponding number of Stage 2 airplanes to another person under § 91.863.
( b ) Foreign air carriers. The base level of a foreign air carrier is equal to the number of owned or leased Stage 2 airplanes that were listed on that carrier's U.S. operations specifications on any one day during the period January 1, 1990, through July 1, 1991, plus or minus any adjustments to the base levels made pursuant to paragraphs (b) (1) and (2). ( 1 ) The base level of a foreign air carrier shall be increased by the amount of foreign air carrier base level acquired with a Stage 2 airplane from another person under § 91.863.
( 2 ) The base level of a foreign air carrier shall be decreased by the amount of foreign air carrier base level transferred with a Stage 2 airplane to another person under § 91.863.
( c ) New entrants do not have a base level.
[Doc. No. 26433, 56 FR 48659, Sept. 25, 1991; 56 FR 51167, Oct. 10, 1991]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Larry Underwood, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 496]

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 9, 1998 *(People v Underwood,*255 AD2d 405), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered June 8, 1995.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Thompson and Joy, *JJ.,*concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 16, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 31079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12160]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms

27 CFR Part 275

[T.D. ATF-424a]
RIN 1512-AB92

Implementation of Public Law 105-33, Section 9302, Relating to 
the Imposition of Permit Requirements on the Manufacturer of Roll-Your-
Own Tobacco (98R-370P)

ACTION: Temporary rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a section of regulations that was 
erroneously revised in a temporary rule (T.D. ATF-424) published in the 
Federal Register of December 22, 1999, regarding the imposition of 
permit requirements on manufacturers of roll-your-own tobacco.

DATES: This rule is effective May 16, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Ruhf, Regulations Division, 
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, 650 Massachusetts Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20226 (202-927-8210).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms 
(ATF) published a document in the Federal Register of December 22, 1999 
(64 FR 71929). We erroneously revised Sec. 275.117(e). This document 
corrects that error.
    In rule FR Doc. 99-32602 published on December 22, 1999, on page 
71932, in the third column, remove the instruction and amendatory text 
in paragraph 25.

    Signed: May 9, 2000.
Bradley A. Buckles,
Director.
[FR Doc. 00-12160 Filed 5-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
```
#### § 18.501 General rule.

Except as otherwise required by the Constitution of the United States, or provided by Act of Congress, or by rules or regulations prescribed by the administrative agency pursuant to statutory authority, or pursuant to executive order, the privilege of a witness, person, government, State, or political subdivision thereof shall be governed by the principles of the common law as they may be interpreted by the courts of the United States in the light of reason and experience. However with respect to an element of a claim or defense as to which State law supplies the rule of decision, the privilege of a witness, person, government, State, or political subdivision thereof shall be determined in accordance with State law.
#### § 101.1 General statement.

The following statements of the general course and method by which the Board's functions are channeled and determined are issued and published pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(1)(B).
secondallongechrismarquez.htm


    SECOND ALLONGE TO
CONVERTIBLE
PROMISSORY NOTE
DATED FEBRUARY 28, 2006

This Second Allonge (the Second Allonge) dated as of July 26, 2007, attached to and forming a part of the Convertible Promissory Note, dated 

    February 28, 2006 (collectively, the Note), made by ECOLOGY COATINGS, INC., a California corporation (the Company), payable to the order of 

    CHRIS L. MARQUEZ (the Holder), in the original principal amount of $300,000.

1.           The first paragraph of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ECOLOGY COATINGS, INC., a California corporation (Company), promises to pay to Chris L. Marquez (Holder) or his registered 

    assigns, in lawful money of the United States of America the principal sum of ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND Dollars ($150,000), or such lesser amount 

    as shall be equal to the outstanding principal amount hereof, together with interest from the date of this Convertible Promissory Note (the Note) 

    on the unpaid principal balance at a rate equal to fifteen percent (15%) per annum, computed on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed and 

    a year of 365 days. All unpaid principal, together with any then unpaid and accrued interest and other amounts payable hereunder, shall be due and 

    payable on the earlier of (i) December 31, 2007 (the Maturity Date), or (ii) when, upon or after the occurrence of an Event of Default (as defined 

    below), such amounts are declared due and payable by Holder or made automatically due and payable in accordance with the terms hereof. This Note is 

    one of a duly authorized series of Convertible Promissory Notes of the Company that may be issued by the Company from time to time of like tenor and 

    effect (except for such variation as may be necessary to express the name of the payee, the number, the date, and the principal amount of each note) 

    each dated on or after February 28, 2006 (the Bridge Notes).

2.           In all other respects, the Note is confirmed, ratified, and approved and, as amended by this Second Allonge, shall continue in full force 

    and effect.


[This space intentionally left blank]






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Holder have caused this Second Allonge to be executed and delivered as of the date and year first above written.

ECOLOGY COATINGS, INC.



By:  /s/ Adam S. Tracy
Adam S. Tracy, Esq.
Its:           Vice President


Accepted and agreed to:


/s/ Chris L Marquez
CHRIS L. MARQUEZ
#### § 1208.5 Material relating to mediation function.

All files, reports, letters, memoranda, and documents relating to the mediation function of the NMB, with the exception of procedural or administrative materials, such as applications, docket letters, or public meeting notices, in the custody of the NMB or its employees relating to or acquired in their mediatory capacity under the Railway Labor Act are hereby declared to be confidential. No such confidential documents or the material contained therein shall be disclosed to any unauthorized person, or be taken or withdrawn, copied or removed from the custody of the NMB or its employees by any person or by any agent of such person or their representative without the explicit consent of the NMB.