alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Mark Escobar

19500 Turtle Ridge Ln

Porter Ranch, CA 91326

I Mark Escobar seek this exemption under the guidelines of Section333 specifically as it 

relates to the Real Estate Industry and aerial video-photography in Los Angeles area 

under the small UAS rule. I believe that I have put together a program that will stand as 

an exemplary model on whom many others entering the market will emulate.

Under the terms of this exemption, it is my intention to safely fly an UAS, specifically a 

DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus Version 2 and a DJI Phantom 3.

I am a military Veteran that had an Aviation job as a Helicopter Mechanic and also flew 

as crew chief during war. I also held as late as 2006 Secret clearance and as late as 

2013 a NACI clearance working as a contractor in Afghanistan

I also hold a FAA mechanic license and work at this time on helicopters at the Van 

Nuys Airport.

I’m also member of the AMA with an umbrella insurance of $1000000, in case of 

accident.

As the new proposed FAA regulation released as of February of 2015,I intend to operate 

well within the most stringent proposal required to operate an unmanned aircraft in the 

National Airspace System (NAS).

Additionally my UAV's will provide for property inspections including roof and chimney 

that can assist in identifying hard to observe defects in manufacturing and installation. 

Camera mounted drones help mitigate accidents and death occurring from slips and 

falls which often result in liability claims and damages to all participants. Invariably, a 

reduction in risk to life and limb is a general benefit to the public interest. Lastly, aerial 

video-photography provides the viewer with safe access to the property vicinity, 

eliminating needless driving to determine how close a property is to a freeway, school, 

beach or nearby unsightly development. This in turn reduces exhaust emissions and air 

pollution. Our UAV's utilize battery power and have no negative impact on the 

environment. When fully rolled out, these emission reductions will be measurable and 

significant.

I firmly believe that granting this exemption will allow for expanded access to the global 

real estate and aerial video-photography market. In many cases, homes/properties may 

have restricted or limited access due to numerous factors. Providing this relief would 

eliminate these problems and lead to increased commerce for both buyers, sellers, 

government taxation agencies, real estate affiliated companies, (title, escrow, notary), 

construction industry and home improvement businesses who rely on a thriving real 

estate market. 

Conclusion:

I would like to add that I am committed to promoting the safe use of UAV's in general 

and specifically in regard to real estate and aerial video-photography related services. 

I believe that by allowing “roll models”, the FAA can begin to establish responsible 

examples for the numerous flying devotees to come.

Note: In accordance with § 11.63 (d), we respectfully propose an effective date of July 

4th, 2015.

Sincerely,

Mark Escobar

19500 Turtle Ridge Ln

Porter Ranch CA 91326
exv10w22







Exhibit 10.22




Employment Outline

For

Tim O’Sullivan

Senior FX Dealer




	 	 	 	 	 
	1.

	 	Salary
	 	$130,000 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	2.

	 	Bonus
	 	Part of the trading bonus pool, if company generates sufficient profit. Amount
available for year 2000 is 10% of all trading revenues less all expenses except
advertising. Actual dollar amount given to an individual trader will be at management’s
discretion. Factors in determining specific trader’s amount will be: trader’s P&L, amount
of risk taken, teamwork and other value added given to the firm.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	3.

	 	Options
	 	80,000 out of a current 10,000,000 shares outstanding following GAIN’s first
completed venture round. Strike price to be set between $.80 - $1.10 per share. Three year
vest — straight line (ie. You get 1/3 of your options on your first anniversary date).
After closing, you will receive a detailed option agreement. Your options are part of an
employee options pool that covers yourself and all other GAIN employees. The grant of
options will be subject to approval by the Company’s Board of Directors. On top of the 15%
employee pool dilution, GAIN will actively be looking for a strategic partner(s) to invest
in GAIN and give us additional credibility. This amount is likely to be at least 10% of
existing shares.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	4.

	 	Right to
Purchase
Preferred
Stock
	 	Before the second closing of GAIN’s first venture round, you also have the ability to
purchase 40,000 shares of participating preferred stock at a price of $1.10 each. In
connection with the purchase of preferred stock, you will be required to execute documents
customary for transactions of this nature, together with a voting agreement.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	5.

	 	Benefits
	 	At this time we are anticipating health insurance 75% funded by GAIN, long-
term disability insurance (60% of salary after 180 days), short-term disability insurance,
life insurance (equal to salary), workman’s compensation, and a 401k package.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	6.

	 	Legal
	 	All GAIN employees must sign a confidentiality, non-compete and non-hire
agreement. All GAIN employees are employees at will.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	7.

	 	Vacation
	 	Three weeks per year. All vacations during the first 6 months of the year 2000
must be approved in advance by the CEO.






     This offer shall terminate if not signed by both parties.





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Mark E. Galant	 	 
	 	/s/ Tim O’Sullivan
	 	 
	 

Mark E. Galant

	 	 
	 	 

Tim O’Sullivan
	 	 
	CEO
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	March 8, 2000	 	 
	 	March 8, 2000	 	 
	Date	 	 
	 	Date
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

207) IV-C-174 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:21:02 AM Sheet 207 of 232 
*«° sr"v 

'o 

z 

P.2 

r\-Qn~i\ 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY "T_ V ~C — J H/ V 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 " ^ / ' jf 

JUL - 5 IpOl 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

R. E. Braun 

1460 Forest Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

Dear Mr. Braun: 

7) ii g n mj;[jj) 

AUG- I 1991 Vx 

EPA AIR DC^ S -

,W*-<><\tThank you for your letter of May 10, 1991 to the 

Environmental Protection Agency concerning onboard refueling 

vapor.recovery systems. It will be submitted to the public 

docket for the onboard rulemaking as you requested. 

You raised some interesting 

Stage II systems instead of onbo 

refueling emissions. We will ta 

consideration in our present rul 

resolved the Stage II vs. onboar 

integrated Stage II/onboard cont 

Amendments to the Clean Air Act. 

onboard controls, after consults 

Transportation regarding safety, 

points concerning the use of 

ard systems for the control of 

ke your comments into 

emaking. As you know, Congress 

d debate by mandating an 

rol approach in the 1990 

A final rule requiring 

tion with the Department of 

is required by November, 1991. 

Please feel free to contact Don Kopinski of my staff at 

(313) 668-4229 if you have any questions or additional comments 

related to this rulemaking. 

Sincerely yours, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY 

RICHARD D.W1LS0'' 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

SDSB:Passavant:cc:2565 Plymouth Rd:X408:7/2/91:ID # 4728W 

Reviewed by DZINGER: If :X27'647:AR-455: 7/3/91: Wang No. 2287T 

Control No. OMS-91-0065 

Primed on Recycled Pv?,-
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION RECEIVED 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS DEC 2 3 2013 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

------------~~--~~~~~ ____ H_E_A_R_INGDOCKET 

In the Matter of Endless Mountains Air 

2012EA050008 F"DrY!S No. 

Judge Not Assigned FAA- 2ol3- o'iit./9-

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration, hereby notifies the United States 

Department of Transportation, Office of Hearings, and the Respondent, pursuant to 14 

C.F.R. §13.204(b), that it shall be represented in the above-stated action by the attorney 

listed below. All communications, notices, pleadings, or documents are respectfully 

requested to be forwarded as follows:: 

Zachary M. Berman 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Telephone: 718 553-3258 

Facsimile: 718 995-5699 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

Hy Zacha~ ~~ rman 

Attorney 

Dated: December 17, 2013 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certifY that on this day copies of the foregoing Notice of Appearance were placed 

in the United States mail, postage prepaid, Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested 

addressed as follows: 

William J. Dobitsch, Jr. 

Endless Mountains Air 

Seamans Airport 

727 Windsock Lane 

Factoryville, PA 18419 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 

~IF FILING BY FEDERAL EXPRESS 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Date: ______ _ 

~~ Paralegal Specialist 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

2
#### In the Matter of Acquiring Title to Public Park, and Opening and Extending Kissena Boulevard, etc., in the Borough of Queens. Flushing National Bank in New York, Appellant; City of New York et al., Respondents.

Argued March 2, 1937;

decided March 23, 1937.

*602
      *Harold R. Zeamans, Benjamin Miller*and *Milton Haas*for appellant.

*Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel (Lewis Orgel, Paxton Blair*and *Daniel M. Cohen*of counsel) for the City of New York, respondent.

*Franklin M. Tomlin*for Rocklyn Realty Corporation, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hhbbs, Loughran, Einch and Rippet, JJ.
EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTCERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
               --------------------------------------------------


October 31, 2006

Board of Directors
Gateway Distributors, Ltd.
North Las Vegas, Nevada

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Form 10-KSB/A filed
on or about November 1, 2006 of the report dated October 26, 2006, relating to
the consolidated financial statements of Gateway Distributors, Ltd. for the year
ended December 31, 2005, and to our inclusion as a named expert.  Our report
included an explanatory paragraph regarding Gateway's ability to continue as a
going concern.


/s/ Lawrence Scharfman
Lawrence Scharfman, CPA PC
9608 Honey Bell Circle
Boynton Beach, Florida 33437
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 24

                              POWER OF ATTORNEY
                              -----------------


         The undersigned, directors of Kellwood Company (the "Company"), do
hereby constitute and appoint Hal J. Upbin or W. Lee Capps, III as his or
her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name,
place and stead, to sign the Company's Form 10-K Annual Report pursuant to
Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as Amended for the fiscal
year ended February 1, 2003, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, granting unto the attorney-in-fact full power and
authority to sign such document on behalf of the undersigned and to make
such filing, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that the
attorney-in-fact, or his substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

Dated:   March 6, 2003


/s/ Raymond F. Bentele                          /s/ Jerry M. Hunter
----------------------------                    ----------------------------
    Raymond F. Bentele                              Jerry M. Hunter


/s/ Martin Bloom                               /s/ Larry R. Katzen
----------------------------                   -----------------------------
    Martin Bloom                                   Larry R. Katzen


/s/ Kitty G. Dickerson                         /s/ Janice E. Page
----------------------------                   -----------------------------
    Kitty G. Dickerson                             Janice E. Page


/s/ Leonard A. Genovese                        /s/ Hal J. Upbin
----------------------------                   -----------------------------
    Leonard A. Genovese                            Hal J. Upbin


/s/ Martin J. Granoff
----------------------------
    Martin J. Granoff
§ 61.96 Applicability and eligibility requirements: General. ( a ) This subpart prescribes the requirement for the issuance of recreational pilot certificates and ratings, the conditions under which those certificates and ratings are necessary, and the general operating rules for persons who hold those certificates and ratings.
( b ) To be eligible for a recreational pilot certificate, a person who applies for that certificate must: ( 1 ) Be at least 17 years of age;
( 2 ) Be able to read, speak, write, and understand the English language. If the applicant is unable to meet one of these requirements due to medical reasons, then the Administrator may place such operating limitations on that applicant's pilot certificate as are necessary for the safe operation of the aircraft;
( 3 ) Receive a logbook endorsement from an authorized instructor who— ( i ) Conducted the training or reviewed the applicant's home study on the aeronautical knowledge areas listed in § 61.97(b) of this part that apply to the aircraft category and class rating sought; and
( ii ) Certified that the applicant is prepared for the required knowledge test.
( 4 ) Pass the required knowledge test on the aeronautical knowledge areas listed in § 61.97(b) of this part;
( 5 ) Receive flight training and a logbook endorsement from an authorized instructor who— ( i ) Conducted the training on the areas of operation listed in § 61.98(b) of this part that apply to the aircraft category and class rating sought; and
( ii ) Certified that the applicant is prepared for the required practical test.
( 6 ) Meet the aeronautical experience requirements of § 61.99 of this part that apply to the aircraft category and class rating sought before applying for the practical test;
( 7 ) Pass the practical test on the areas of operation listed in § 61.98(b) that apply to the aircraft category and class rating;
( 8 ) Comply with the sections of this part that apply to the aircraft category and class rating; and
( 9 ) Hold either a student pilot certificate or sport pilot certificate.
[Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16298, Apr. 4, 1997; Amdt. 61-103, 62 FR 40902, July 30, 1997; Amdt. 61-124, 74 FR 42558, Aug. 21, 2009]
#### § 101.3 [Reserved]
| (1)   | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of EcoReady Corporation. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 23, 2010 |   | /s/ Boris Rubizhevsky        |   |
|-------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Boris Rubizhevsky            |   |
|                    |   | Principal Accounting Officer |   |
§ 1911.2 Definitions. As used in this part, unless the context clearly requires otherwise— ( a ) *Assistant Secretary* means the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
( b ) *Act* means the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1590; 29 U.S.C. 650).
( c ) *Standard* means an occupational safety and health standard which requires conditions, or the adoption or use of one or more practices, means, methods, operations, or processes, reasonably necessary or appropriate to provide safe or healthful employment and places of employment, and which is to be promulgated, modified, or revoked in accordance with section 6(b) (1), (2), (3), and (4) of the Act.
( d ) *Particular statute* means any of the following statutes of particular application: The Act of June 30, 1936, commonly known as the Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act (41 U.S.C. 35 et seq.), the Service Contract Act of 1965 (41 U.S.C. 351 et seq.), the Construction Safety Act (40 U.S.C. 333), the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. 941), or the National Foundation on Arts and Humanities Act (20 U.S.C. 951 et seq.).
#### STATE OF FLORIDA v GONZALEZ

Case No. 84-314 AC

Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Appellate Division, Dade County

October 8, 1986

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Jim Smith, Attorney General, and G. Bart Billbrough, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Ileana Rodreguez for appellee.

Before TENDRICH, HENDERSON, SHAPIRO, JJ.

*116OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Appellant, STATE OF FLORIDA, seeks review of an Order of the County Court granting Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss on speedy trial grounds. For the reasons set forth herein, we reverse the trial Court’s Order.

Appellee was charged with the offenses of speeding and driving under the influence of alcohol on August 3, 1984. He was arraigned on August 27 and entered a plea of not guilty. Trial was set for October 17, 1984. On that date, trial was postponed and the speedy trial period extended to November 14, 1984. On that date, the State indicated it was willing to proceed even though the D. O. Technician was unavailable for trial. The trial Court disregarded the State’s announcement and dismissed the charge of driving under the influence on speedy trial grounds.

While we recognize the frustrations of the trial Court in proceeding in an orderly manner on cases brought to trial, the Court must nevertheless afford the State an opportunity to present its case as it sought to do herein. Had the State been unable to carry its burden, which was a distinct possibility without the D. O. Technician, the Court would have been well justified in finding for the Defendant. However, the Court should not have precluded the State from attempting to proceed. The speedy trial time had not run. The State was within its bounds in requesting to proceed to trial.

Based on the foregoing, the Order of Dismissal entered by the trial Court is reversed and the matter remanded for trial.
#### COREY HIGHLAND LAND CO. v. BIRMINGHAM RAILWAY LIGHT & POWER CO.

(Decided December 1, 1916.)

Appeal from Birmingham City Court.

Heard before Hon. John C. Pugh.

No counsel marked for appellant.

Tillman, Bradley &. Morrow, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
Second Amendment to Amended Agreement of Limited Partnership



 Exhibit 4.1 
 DIVALL INSURED INCOME PROPERTIES 2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO 
 AMENDED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 
 This Second Amendment to Amended Agreement of Limited Partnership (the this “Amendment”) of Divall Insured Income Properties 2 Limited
Partnership, a Wisconsin limited partnership, is made and effective as of November 9, 2009 (the “Effective Date”), by and among the Provo Group, Inc., an Illinois corporation, as General Partner, and the Limited Partners of the
Partnership (the “Limited Partners”). 
 WHEREAS, as of October 31, 2009, the holders of a majority of the
outstanding limited partner units in Divall Insured Income Properties 2 Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) consented to amend the Amended Agreement of Limited Partnership (the “Partnership Agreement”), dated May 26,
1993, as specifically set forth below; and 
 WHEREAS, Article IX of the Partnership Agreement grants the General Partner an
irrevocable power of attorney to act on behalf of each Limited Partner to execute all amendments to the Partnership Agreement. 
 NOW THEREFORE, the Partnership Agreement shall be amended effective as of the Effective Date, as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 2.2 of the Partnership Agreement is deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof: 

 “The term of the Partnership shall continue in full force and effect until November 30, 2020 or until dissolution prior thereto
pursuant to the provisions of Article VIII.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date first
written above. 
  

					
	GENERAL PARTNER:
	
	The Provo Group, Inc.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Bruce A. Provo
		 	Bruce A. Provo, President
	
	LIMITED PARTNERS:
		
	By:	 	The Provo Group, Inc., pursuant to Article IX power of attorney
			
		 	By:	 	/s/ Bruce A. Provo
		 		 	Bruce Provo, President