alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1





Exhibit 10.1




Rochester Medical Corporation

Fiscal 2010 Management Incentive Plan




(adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors on November 17, 2009)




EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN (BONUS)




Eligibility





	•	 	All Executive Officers will be eligible to participate.
	 
	•	 	Recommended participation rates have been set by the President, and are based upon the
respective position level and function of each executive.
	 
	•	 	Participation rates for incentive bonuses are expressed as a percentage of base salary.





Fiscal 2010




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Bonus Participation	 	Weighted Performance
	 	 	(% of Base Salary)	 	Criteria
	 	 	Minimum	 	Target	 	Maximum	 	 	 	Gross
	Participant	 	Payout	 	Payout	 	Payout	 	Sales	 	Margin
	Anthony Conway
	 	0%	 	60%	 	90%	 	50%	 	50%
	David Jonas
	 	0%	 	50%	 	75%	 	50%	 	50%
	Martyn Sholtis
	 	0%	 	50%	 	75%	 	75%	 	25%
	Philip Conway
	 	0%	 	50%	 	75%	 	50%	 	50%
	James Carper
	 	0%	 	40%	 	60%	 	75%	 	25%
	Robert Anglin
	 	0%	 	40%	 	60%	 	50%	 	50%







	•	 	Both weighted performance criteria (sales and gross margin) have minimum requirements and
maximum levels of payout. The range of accomplishment for each performance criteria is
0%-150%, with 100% being at target. The sales and gross margin performance targets are
approved by the Compensation Committee. The performance target for sales for 100% achievement
is based on the approved fiscal 2010 sales budget, with the minimum requirement set at sales
equivalent to fiscal 2009 results, and the maximum payout earned at two times the fiscal 2010
sales budget. The performance target for gross margin for 100% achievement is based on
budgeted fiscal 2010 gross margin percentage, with the minimum requirement set at 4% below the
budgeted fiscal 2010 gross margin percentage, and the maximum payout earned at 4% above the
budgeted fiscal 2010 gross margin percentage.





Bonus Calculation and Payout




The CFO will calculate actual results from the respective areas of responsibility for each
executive against financial targets for review by the CEO. All targets will be calculated
exclusive of exchange rate gains or losses. This calculation will result in a payout level as a
percentage of the annual incentive target. Performance levels will be reviewed, and any deviations
from the approved plan must be approved, by the Compensation Committee prior to disbursement.
#### Augusta C. Ottmann, as Administratrix of the Estate of Milford H. Ottmann, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Village of Rockville Centre et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Another.

Submitted April 19, 1937;

decided May 18, 1937.

Motion for reargument and to amend the remittitur granted to the extent of permitting reargument as to the liability of the individual defendant Otto Stoye. Case set down for argument during the fourth week of the present session. (See 273 N. Y. 205.)
#### § 1650.102 Delegation of authority.

The Chair delegated to the Chief Human Capital Officer the authority to collect debts owed by current EEOC employees, and to the Chief Financial Officer the authority to collect debts owed by former EEOC employees and non-EEOC employees.
#### § 262.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to ensure that carriers provide travel credits or vouchers, upon request, to consumers who are restricted or prohibited from traveling by a governmental entity due to a serious communicable disease (*e.g.,* as a result of a stay at home order, entry restriction, or border closure) or are advised by a licensed treating medical professional consistent with public health guidance issued by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) or the World Health Organization (WHO) not to travel to protect themselves or others from a serious communicable disease.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CURTIS PALMORE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 294 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of June, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
§ 1627.6 Availability of records for inspection. ( a ) *Place records are to be kept.* The records required to be kept by this part shall be kept safe and accessible at the place of employment or business at which the individual to whom they relate is employed or has applied for employment or membership, or at one or more established central recordkeeping offices.
( b ) *Inspection of records.* All records required by this part to be kept shall be made available for inspection and transcription by authorized representatives of the Commission during business hours generally observed by the office at which they are kept or in the community generally. Where records are maintained at a central recordkeeping office pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, such records shall be made available at the office at which they would otherwise be required to be kept within 72 hours following request from the Commission or its authorized representative.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3046-0018) (Pub. L. 96-511, 94 Stat. 2812 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*))
[44 FR 38459, July 2, 1979, as amended at 46 FR 63268, Dec. 31, 1981]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                         62,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,496
<CGS>                                           32,944
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,314
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (7)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,341
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,221
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,448
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,773
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,773
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARVIN PRICE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 289 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of December, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### STATE ex LAUBSCHER v INDUST COMM

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21581.

Decided May 8, 1929

Syllabus by

ROBINSON, J.

EMPLOYER & EMPLOYE

(250 W3) Paragraph four of Section 1465-82, General Code, does not operate either to antedate the payment of compensation to a dependent of a deceased workman, who has died as a result of an injury more than two years after the date of receiving such injury, to a period prior to such death, nor to extend the eight-year period provided in paragraph two of that Section.

Marshall, CJ, Kinkade, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ, concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting.

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Physics (1208).                    

*Date and Time:*                         June 9, 2000 from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Department of Physics, Princeton University.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Bradley D. Keister, Program Director for Nuclear Physics, Room 1015N, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 306-1891.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning the activities of the Princeton group in the development and Construction of the Borexino Solar neutrino detector.                    

*Agenda:*                         To hear presentations and write recommendations concerning the activities of the Princeton group development and Construction of the Borexino Solar neutrino detector.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or Confidential nature, including technical information; information on personnel and proprietary data for Present and future subcontracts. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: May 12, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-12460  Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
# C_2021116EN.01000101.xml

| 31.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2019-2020 SESSION

Sittings of 3 and 4 April 2019

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 51, 12.2.2021.

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4971 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4971

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 229 Minnetonka Avenue South in Wayzata, Minnesota, as the ``Jim 
                         Ramstad Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JIM RAMSTAD POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 229 Minnetonka Avenue South in Wayzata, Minnesota, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Jim Ramstad Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jim 
Ramstad Post Office''.

            Passed the Senate December 17, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4971

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 229 Minnetonka Avenue South in Wayzata, Minnesota, as the ``Jim 
                         Ramstad Post Office''.
```
[No. 27246-6-II.

Division Two.

November 8, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Glenn Livermore, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grays Harbor County, No. 00-8-00444-1, David S. Hatch, J. Pro Tern., entered March 15, 2001. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Hunt, C.J., and Quinn-Brintnall, J.
#### § 91.1437 CAMP: Authority to perform and approve maintenance.

A program manager who maintains program aircraft under a CAMP may employ maintenance personnel, or make arrangements with other persons to perform maintenance and preventive maintenance as provided in its maintenance manual. Unless properly certificated, the program manager may not perform or approve maintenance for return to service.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Elliott, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 494]

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 14, 1998 *(People v Elliott,*256 AD2d 418), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 8, 1997.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Mangano, P. J., S. Miller, Thompson and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
23







CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
Nos. 333-155714 and 333-155799 of The Laclede Group, Inc., on Form S-3 and
in Registration Statement Nos. 333-157367, 333-90248, 333-90252, 333-90254,
333-102836, and 333-131830 of The Laclede Group, Inc. on Form S-8 of our reports
dated November 20, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements
and financial statement schedule of The Laclede Group, Inc. (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding
the Company’s adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109(ASC 740, Income Taxes),effective October 1,
2007, and the effectiveness of The Laclede Group, Inc.’s internal control over
financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The
Laclede Group, Inc. and Laclede Gas Company for the year ended
September 30, 2009.




We
also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-141439 of  Laclede Gas Company on Form S-3 of our reports
dated November 20, 2009,  relating to the financial statements
and financial statement schedule of Laclede Gas Company (which report expresses
an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the
Company’s adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109(ASC 740, Income Taxes),effective October 1,
2007, and the effectiveness of Laclede Gas Company’s internal control over
financial reporting appearing in Exhibit 99.1 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of The Laclede Group, Inc. and Laclede Gas Company for the year
ended September 30, 2009.







/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


St.
Louis, Missouri


November 20,
2009
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-20175 Summary Calendar

WENDY MEIGS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

NMC HOMECARE INCORPORATED, formerly known as National Medical Care Home Care Division, Incorporated; NATIONAL MEDICAL CARE INCORPORATED, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas

(H-95-CV-4320) September 5, 1997
Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Meigs sued her employers, NMC Homecare Inc. And National
Medical Care Inc., alleging wrongful discharge under Texas law.
The employers removed this action to the federal district court on2

the grounds of diversity. The federal district judge entered summary judgment in favor of the employers and Meigs appealed.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts and
relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated by
the district judge in her thorough and comprehensive order filed
under date of January 26, 1997, we are satisfied that the grant of summary judgment in favor of the employers was correct.

AFFIRMED
.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1249]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (00-005)]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Space Science Advisory Committee 
(SScAC); Meeting.

AGENCY:  National Aeronautics and Space Administration

ACTION:  Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. 
L. 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory 
Council, Space Science Advisory Committee.

DATES:  Tuesday, February 29, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 5:45 p.m.; Wednesday, 
March 1, 2000, 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m; Thursday, March 2, 2000, 8:15 
a.m. to 12:15 p.m.

ADDRESSES:  NASA Headquarters, Conference Room 7H46, 300 E Street, SW, 
Washington, DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Dr. Jeffrey Rosendhal, Code S, 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 
202/358-2470.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  The meeting will be open to the public up 
to the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as follows:

--OSS Program Status/FY2001 Budget Proposal
--OSS Strategic Plan
--Report from Planetary Protection Task Force
--Report from Technology Readiness Task Force
--Astrobiology Program
--Theme Status Reports
--Technology Program Report
--Reports from Subcommittees
--Research Program Report

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: January 12, 2000.
Matthew M. Crouch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-1249 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23

           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-98395, 033-64847, 333-98393, 333-128119,
333-128115, 333-124076) of Kellwood Company of our report dated March 21, 2007
relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules,
management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
March 22, 2007
§ 1910.98 Effective dates. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart G shall become effective on August 27, 1971, except as provided in the remaining paragraphs of this section.
( b ) The following provisions shall become effective on February 15, 1972: § 1910.94 (a)(2)(iii), (a)(3), (a)(4), (b), (c)(2), (c)(3), (c)(4), (c)(5), (c)(6)(i), (c)(6)(ii), (d)(1)(ii), (d)(3), (d)(4), (d)(5), and (d)(7).
( c ) Notwithstanding anything in paragraph (a), (b), or (d) of this section, any provision in any other section of this subpart which contains in itself a specific effective date or time limitation shall become effective on such date or shall apply in accordance with such limitation.
( d ) Notwithstanding anything in paragraph (a) of this section, if any standard in 41 CFR part 50-204, other than a national consensus standard incorporated by reference in § 50-204.2(a)(1), is or becomes applicable at any time to any employment and place of employment, by virtue of the Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act, or the Service Contract Act of 1965, or the National Foundation on Arts and Humanities Act of 1965, any corresponding established Federal standard in this subpart G which is derived from 41 CFR part 50-204 shall also become effective, and shall be applicable to such employment and place of employment, on the same date.
CHRISTOPHER TERRY

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 5696

______ _______________________/

Opinion filed October 4, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Levy County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender,

Tallahassee , for Appellant; Christopher Ter ry, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 32.2 IDEAEDGE, INC. CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350
(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) In connection with the Annual Report of IdeaEdge, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jonathan Shultz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that : (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  December 29, 2010/s/ Jonathan ShultzJonathan ShultzChief Financial Officer