alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|                      | /s/ TERRY G. ROUSSEL                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |   |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      August 7, 2008 | Terry      G. RousselChief      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) ofCornerstone      Ventures, Inc., Managing Member ofCornerstone      Industrial Properties, LLC, the Managing Member ofCornerstone      Realty Fund, LLC |   |
|                      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |   |
|                      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |   |
|                      | /s/ SHARON C. KAISER                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |   |
| Date:      August 7, 2008 | Sharon      C. KaiserChief      Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) ofCornerstone      Ventures, Inc., Managing Member ofCornerstone      Industrial Properties, LLC, the Managing Member ofCornerstone      Realty Fund, LLC |   |

----
#### § 1912.25 Call of meetings.

No advisory committee shall hold any meeting except at the call of, or with the advance approval, of the Assistant Secretary or his representative designated for this purpose. The Department of Labor's Committee Management Officer shall be promptly informed of any meeting that is called.
INDEMNITY AGAINST UNCOLLECTIBJLE DEBTS.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

July 1899.]

Smith, Swing and Giffin, JJ.

#### Mercantile Credit & Guaranty Co. v. Littleford Bros.

A Contract of Indemnity for Uncollectible Debts a Contract of Insurance.

A contract of indemnity against losses arising from uncontrollable debts is a contract of insurance, and ambiguities will be construed in favor of the insured.

*Follett &*Kelley, for plaintiff in error.

*Littleford, Morris, Ballard & Sawyer,*contra.

Smith, J.

One of the principal questions arising in this case is as to the construction to be placed on a contract made by the plaintiff in error to indemnify the defendants in error against losses arising from uncollectible debts. This is to be held as a contract of insurance, and the rule applies to it which does to other policies of insurance, viz., that all ambiguities in such policy are to be given that construction which is most favorable to the assured. There certainly can be no question but the policy in this case is on the point at issue between these parties most ambiguous, so much so as to induce one to believe that it was designed.

In view of the rule we have stated, we are of the opinion that the construction placed on this contract by Judge Wright when ruling on a demurrer to a part of the answer of the defendant company, which is before us, was correct, ánd therefore that his rulings as to the demurrer, evidence, etc., were in accordance with that view and were not erroneous. Nor do we see error in other rulings in the case prejudicial to the plaintiff in error, and the judgment will therefore be affirmed with costs, but without penalty.'
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 8463 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2014

- NM

- 226

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$8 5 / h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Modification 2.0 $ 170.00 $0 $ 170.00 

### 4 $ 680.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance : 

### 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 680



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### 0

On

- Condition Costs:

Actio n

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product



### 0

. 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 

### 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant eco nomic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft o perated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
§ 1915.2 Scope and application. ( a ) Except where otherwise provided, the provisions of this part shall apply to all ship repairing, shipbuilding and shipbreaking employments and related employments.
( b ) This part does not apply to matters under the control of the United States Coast Guard within the scope of Title 52 of the Revised Statutes and acts supplementary or amendatory thereto (46 U.S.C. secs. 1-1388 passim) including, but not restricted to, the master, ship's officer, crew members, design, construction and maintenance of the vessel, its gear and equipment; to matters within the regulatory authority of the United States Coast Guard to safeguard vessels, harbors, ports and waterfront facilities under the provisions of the Espionage Act of June 17, 1917, as amended (50 U.S.C. 191 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 401 et seq.); including the provisions of Executive Order 10173, as amended by Executive Orders 10277 and 10352 (3 CFR, 1949-1953 Comp., pp. 356, 778 and 873); or to matters within the regulatory authority of the United States Coast Guard with respect to lights, warning devices, safety equipment and other matters relating to the promotion of safety of lives and property under section 4(e) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1333).
§ 10.23 Deductions. The contractor may make deductions that reduce a worker's wages below the Executive Order minimum wage rate only if such deduction qualifies as a: ( a ) Deduction required by Federal, State, or local law, such as Federal or State withholding of income taxes;
( b ) Deduction for payments made to third parties pursuant to court order;
( c ) Deduction directed by a voluntary assignment of the worker or his or her authorized representative; or
( d ) Deduction for the reasonable cost or fair value, as determined by the Administrator, of furnishing such worker with “board, lodging, or other facilities,” as defined in 29 U.S.C. 203(m) and part 531 of this title.
#### § 61.60 Change of address.

The holder of a pilot, flight instructor, or ground instructor certificate who has made a change in permanent mailing address may not, after 30 days from that date, exercise the privileges of the certificate unless the holder has notified in writing the FAA, Airman Certification Branch, P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125, of the new permanent mailing address, or if the permanent mailing address includes a post office box number, then the holder's current residential address.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D21-3160

_____________________________

NSPR CARE CENTERS, LLC,

d/b/a NSPIRE HEALTHCARE 

TAMARAC/XL SPECIALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY, and

ALTERNATIVE SERVICE 

CONCEPTS, LLC,

Appellants/Cross-Appellees,

v.

NATHANIEL HOUSTON,

Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Office of the Judges of 

Compensation Claims.

Iliana Forte, Judge.

Date of Accident: June 24, 2019.

September 16, 2022

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, C.J., and RAY and MAKAR, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Paul T. Terlizzese of Hurley, Rogner, Miller, Cox & Waranch, P.A., 

Fort Pierce, and William H. Rogner of HR Law, P.A., Winter Park,

for Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

Kenneth B. Schwartz of Winer Law Group, Fort Lauderdale, and 

Adam G. Werner of Gordon & Partners, P.A., Palm Beach 

Gardens, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
# EUR-Lex - 31999Y0826(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999Y0826(01)

**Commission notice on technical adaptations to the method for setting the reference and discount rates (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal C 241 , 26/08/1999 P. 0009 - 0009 *

Commission notice on technical adaptations to the method for setting the reference and discount rates

(1999/C 241/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 2 July 1997 the Commission decided to adopt, with effect from 1 August 1997, a new method for setting and updating the reference and discount rates. Member States were informed by letter (dated 18 August 1997) and a notice was published in the Official Journal of the European Communities (C 273 of 9 September 1997).

This method sets the reference rate for each Member State on the basis of indicative rates defined as the monthly average of the five-year interbank swap rates, plus an adjustment premium.

Following entry into the third stage of economic and monetary union on 1 January 1999 and in view of the use of the euro by the financial markets, the Commission has decided to make the following technical adaptations:

1. From 1 August 1999 the reference rate will be identical for the eleven Member States which have adopted the euro;

2. For those countries, the indicative rate will be defined as the average of the five-year interbank swap rates, plus a premium of 75 basis points.

All the other aspects of the method outlined in the Commission notice of 9 September 1997 continue to apply.

For Member States which have not adopted the euro, the method for setting the reference rates is unchanged.
#### § 1205.4 Substantive rules.

The only substantive rules issued by the National Mediation Board are those authorized under section 2, Ninth, of the Railway Labor Act to implement the procedure of determining employee representation.

[12 FR 2451, Apr. 16, 1947. Redesignated at 13 FR 8740, Dec. 30, 1948, as amended at 64 FR 40287, July 26, 1999]
§ 91.1441 CAMP: Transfer of maintenance records. When a U.S.-registered fractional ownership program aircraft maintained under a CAMP is removed from the list of program aircraft in the management specifications, the program manager must transfer to the purchaser, at the time of the sale, the following records of that aircraft, in plain language form or in coded form that provides for the preservation and retrieval of information in a manner acceptable to the Administrator: ( a ) The records specified in § 91.1439(a)(2).
( b ) The records specified in § 91.1439(a)(1) that are not included in the records covered by paragraph (a) of this section, except that the purchaser may allow the program manager to keep physical custody of such records. However, custody of records by the program manager does not relieve the purchaser of its responsibility under § 91.1439(c) to make the records available for inspection by the Administrator or any representative of the National Transportation Safety Board.
#### CUNNINGHAM v. THE STATE.

(Decided November 21, 1916.)

Appeal from Monroe Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Ben D. Turner.

No counsel marked for appellant.

W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed on motion of Attorney General.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12412]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 9, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Phillip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Bankoelwein, Inc., Oelwein, Iowa; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Community Bank 
of Oelwein, Oelwein, Iowa.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Franklin Bancorp, Inc., Washington, Missouri; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Bank 
of Franklin County, Washington, Missouri.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Maria Villanueva, 
Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 
94105-1579:
    1. Greater Bay Bancorp, Palo Alto, California; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Bank of Santa Clara, Santa Clara, 
California.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 11, 2000.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-12412 Filed 5-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
§ 16.304 Further proceedings. ( a ) Ordinarily, the determination of an award will be made on the basis of the written record. However, on request of either the applicant or agency counsel, or on his or her own initiative, the adjudicative officer may order further proceedings, such as an informal conference, oral argument, additional written submissions or an evidentiary hearing. Such further proceedings shall be held only when necessary for full and fair resolution of the issues arising from the application, and shall be conducted as promptly as possible.
( b ) A request that the adjudicative officer order further proceedings under this section shall specifically identify the information sought or the disputed issues and shall explain why the additional proceedings are necessary to resolve the issues.
----

|                         | /s/      TERRY G. ROUSSEL                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:      November 13, 2009 | Terry      G. RousselChief      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) ofCornerstone      Ventures, Inc., Managing Member ofCornerstone      Industrial Properties, LLC, the Managing Member ofCornerstone      Realty Fund, LLC |
|                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                         | /s/      SHARON C. KAISER                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| Date:      November 13, 2009 | Sharon      C. KaiserChief      Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) ofCornerstone      Ventures, Inc., Managing Member ofCornerstone      Industrial Properties, LLC, the Managing Member ofCornerstone      Realty Fund, LLC |

----
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 23.01

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated January 27, 1999 (except with respect to the
matters discussed in the eighth and ninth paragraphs of Note 5, as to which
the date is February 12, 1999, and Note 22, as to which the date is March 15,
1999) included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statement No. 333-43985 relating to the Company's Savings Plan
and the 401(K) Savings Plan for Employees of the Louisville Gas and Electric
Company who are represented by Local 2100 of IBEW, Post-Effective Amendment
No. One to Registration Statement No. 33-56942 and Post-Effective Amendment
No.1-C to Registration Statement No. 33-33687 relating to the Automatic
Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan of the Company, Registration
Statement No. 333-05457 and Post-Effective Amendment No. 2-C to Registration
Statement No. 33-33687 relating to the Employee Common Stock Purchase Plan of
the Company, Registration No. 333-05459 and Post-Effective Amendment No. Two
to Registration Statement No. 33-38557 relating to the Omnibus Long-Term
Incentive Plan of the Company, Post-Effective Amendment No. One to
Registration Statement No. 33-56525 relating to the Stock Option Plan for
Non-Employee Directors of the Company, and Post-Effective Amendment No. One
to Registration Statement No. 33-60765 relating to the Deferred Stock
Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors of the Company.


                                          /S/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                          -----------------------
                                          Arthur Andersen LLP

Louisville, Kentucky
March 26, 1999
# EUR-Lex - 31995R0693 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995R0693

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 693/95 of 30 March 1995 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1756/93 fixing the operative events for the agricultural conversion rate applicable to milk and milk products **

*
Official Journal L 071 , 31/03/1995 P. 0052 - 0053 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 693/95 of 30 March 1995 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1756/93 fixing the operative events for the agricultural conversion rate applicable to milk and milk products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3813/92 of 28 December 1992 on the unit of account and the conversion rates to be applied for the purposes of the common agricultural policy (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 150/95 (2), and in particular Article 6 (2) thereof,

Whereas the purpose of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1756/93 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 267/95 (4), is precisely to fix the agricultural conversion rate to be applied to all amounts fixed in ecus in the milk and milk products sector; whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 685/69 of 14 April 1969 on detailed rules of application for intervention on the market in butter and cream (5), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 393/94 (6), is repealed and replaced by Commission Regulation (EC) No 454/95 (7); whereas, therefore, the references in the Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 1756/93 should be amended;

Whereas the provisions on the validity of the aid voucher laid down in Article 2 (1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2191/81 of 31 July 1981 on the granting of aid for the purchase of butter by non-profit-making institutions and organizations (8), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 455/95 (9); whereas the operative event relating thereto should therefore be adjusted;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 1756/93 is hereby amended as follows:

1. Point 1 of Part B.I is replaced by the following:

>TABLE>

2. Point 1 of Part B.III is replaced by the following:

>TABLE>

3. Point 2 of Part D is replaced by the following:

>TABLE>

Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 March 1995.

For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission