alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Marshall *v.*Smith *et al*

Where there has been a reference under subd. 3, § 271 of the Code, every question depending not on the facts found, but on error in the proceedings on the trial or in the determination of the facts, must be raised by exception, and there can be no review in this court of the correctness of the determination of the facts.

Appeal from the Supreme Court. In an action for the foreclosure of certain mortgages there was a sale under the judgment, which produced surplus moneys to the amount of $3,800. One Hannah B. Smith claiming the whole surplus, a reference was ordered to ascertain and report the amount due to her or to any other person which was a lien upon such surplus, and to ascertain the priorities pf the several liens. The plaintiff Marshall claimed a part of the surplus, as did also the defendant Thomas Downing. Their claims were litigated before the referee, and he reported that Marshall was entitled to $300 and Hannah B. Smith to all the remainder. An order was made for distribution of the money accordingly. Downing appealed, and the order was affirmed at general term in the second district. Downing then appealed to this court. Ho exceptions were filed to the referee’s report.

*John K. Porter,*for the appellant.

*Mr. Willard,*for the respondent.

*252Johnson, Ch. J,

The reference in this cause has taken place under subdivision 3 of section 271 of the Code, which provides for a reference where a question of fact, other than upon the pleadings, shall arise upon motion or otherwise, in any stage of the action. Where the reference is to report facts, the report has the effect of a special verdict, by the provisions of section 272, and the question arising on the facts thus found, it has been held, may be reviewed on appeal without exceptions. (Ki*rby*v. Fitzpatrick, 18 *N. Y.,*454.) But if in such a case any question be made depending not on the facts found, but on any error in the proceedings on the trial, or in the determination of the facts, the point must be raised by excep tions, and there can be no review of the correctness of the determination of the facts in this court. The general term of the Supreme Court has the final power of determining on the correctness of decisions of fact made by referees or a single judge. In this case there are no exceptions to the decision of the referee; nor upon the facts found by him can there be any question of the correctness of his decision.

This is sufficient to dispose of the case here, and the decision at general term should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.
71°45'

71°45'

71°52'30"

71°52'30"

42°15' 42°15'

42°7'30" 42°7'30"

SCALE 1:24,000

WORCESTER SOUTH QUADRANGLE

1 0.5 0 1 MILES

1 0.5 0 1 KILOMETERS

Stone, B.D., Stone, J.R., and DiGiacomo-Cohen, M.L., 2008, Surficial

geologic map of the Worcester North-Oxford-Wrentham-Attleboro

nine-quadrangle area in south-central Massachusetts: U.S. Geological

Survey Open-File Report 2006-1260-D.

Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1260/D.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

OFFICE OF THE STATE GEOLOGIST

AND EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS

Prepared in cooperation with the OPEN-FILE REPORT 2006-1260-D

Explanatory pamphlet accompanies map

Surficial Geologic Map of the Worcester South Quadrangle, Massachusetts

Compiled by

Byron D. Stone, Janet R. Stone, and Mary L. DiGiacomo-Cohen

2008

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, 1973.

Map was scanned, processed, georeferenced,

rectified, and cropped by the Office of the

Massachusetts State Geologist. Image available online at:

http://www.geo.umass.edu/stategeologist/frame_maps.htm

Geology mapped by G.M. Haselton and B.D. Stone

in 1982. Bedrock outcrops mapped by H.R. Dixon in

1977. Some postglacial units mapped using 2005

orthophoto images. CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

(SHEET 2 of 8)

(WORCESTER NORTH)

(OXFORD)

(LEIC

E

S

TE

R)

(G

RA

F

TO

N)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                       JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                  1,393,547
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                           5,447,076
<ALLOWANCES>                            1,002,336
<INVENTORY>                             7,283,553
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       13,227,924
<PP&E>                                    760,588
<DEPRECIATION>                            331,958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         14,079,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   2,236,981
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                7,342,163
<OTHER-SE>                              4,500,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           14,079,208
<SALES>                                42,612,206
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       42,612,206
<CGS>                                  34,941,613
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          12,549,019
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         2,792,167
<INCOME-TAX>                            1,143,062
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     1,649,105
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                            1,649,105
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.31



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Daniel Dror, CEO and Chairman of
American International Industries, Inc, a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following
certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with
respect to the following annual report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006.

The undersigned certifies that the above report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and information contained in the above report fairly presents, in all respects, the
financial condition of American International Industries, Inc. and results of its
operations.

Date: May 22, 2006
Daniel Dror
CEO and Chairman/s/ Daniel Dror
NO. 07-06-0211-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

DECEMBER 7, 2006

______________________________

ERSKINE L.T. ALLEN, JR., 

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 137TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 22,580; HON. CECIL PURYEAR, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Abatement and Remand

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Erskine L.T. Allen, Jr. (appellant) perfected an appeal from the trial court’s denial

of his motion for DNA testing. Pending before this court is his appointed counsel’s motion

to withdraw. From the contents of the motion, it appears that a conflict of interest exists

between appellant and his appointed counsel. Thus, we grant the motion of counsel to

withdraw. We further abate and remand the case to the 137th Judicial District Court and

order the judge of that court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant in this appeal.
2

The name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of the newly appointed

attorney shall be included in the order of appointment. The trial judge shall also cause the

order appointing new counsel to be filed with this court, on or before January 5, 2007, via

a supplemental clerk’s record. Finally, the appellant’s brief (which may include an Anders

brief if warranted) will be due on or before February 5, 2007. 

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
§ 1410.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to set forth rules to inform the public about information maintained by the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service about individuals, to inform those individuals how they may gain access to and correct or amend information about themselves, and to exempt disclosure of identity of confidential sources of certain records.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### § 1915.1450 Occupational exposure to hazardous chemicals in laboratories.

Note:

The requirements applicable to shipyard employment under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1450 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-1910.1450).

[[61 FR 31431](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31431), June 20, 1996]
[No. 27889-8-II.

Division Two.

December 13, 2002.]

#### Gerald Rhoades, et al., *Appellants,*v. The City of Battle Ground, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 00-2-05067-8, Roger A. Bennett, J., entered September, 27, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J., concurred in by Seinfeld and Armstrong, JJ. Now published at 115 Wn. App. 752.
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0566 Directorate ID : 2011 - SW - 008 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Model EC135 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 226 Helicopters in the US Reg istry . Reason : The actions are intended to detect a crack in the ring frame which could result in loss of the fenestron structure and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 7,425 for the ring replacement $1,320 for the ring frame modification & re identification Labor per Helicopter ( 0.5 x $ 8 5 /work- hour for the inspection) (8 x $85/work- hour for the ring frame replacement) (17 x $85/work - hour for the ring frame modification & re - identification) $ 42.50 per inspection cycle $680 $1,445 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $8,105 for the ring frame replacement $2,765 for the ring frame modification & re identification Total US Fleet Cost $ Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Sharon Miles
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Kelsay Butte quadrangle, Oregon: 7.5-minute series (topographic)**
 
2012 | 2014 | 2015 | 2017
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28/6:44118-H 6/
Item Number:0080-G-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000932100
 
January 24, 2018
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12329]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Intent To File Application for a New License

May 11, 2000.
    Take notice that the following notice of intent has been filed with 
the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of filing: Notice of Intent to File an Application for New 
License.
    b. Project No.: 2174.
    c. Date filed: March 29, 2000.
    d. Submitted By: Southern California Edison Company.
    e. Name of Project: Portal.
    f. Location: Upper San Joaquin River Basin, Rancheria Creek and Big 
Creek in Fresno County, California.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Section 15 of the Federal Power Act, 18 CFR 
16.6.
    h. Pursuant to Section 16.19 of the Commission's regulations, the 
licensee is required to make available the information described in 
Section 16.7 of the regulations. Such information is available from the 
licensee at Southern Edison Company, 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue, 
Rosemead, California 91770. Interested parties can contact Stephen E. 
Pickett (818) 302-1564.
    i. FERC Contact: Patricia W. Gillis, (202) 208-0735, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f2f3e2b2d363c363e7138363333362c1f393a2d3c71393a3b712a2c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="77071603051e141e1659101e1b1b1e04371112051459111213590204">[email protected]</span></a>.
    j. Expiration Date of Current License: March 31, 2005.
    k. The project consists of a dam having a 325 acre-feet storage 
capacity, 6-mile long water conveyance tunnel, steel penstock, 
powerhouse having an installed capacity of 10.8 MW, 33-kV transmission 
line and appurtenant facilities,
    l. The licensee states its unequivocal intent to submit an 
application for a new license for Project No. 2174. Pursuant to 18 CFR 
16.9(b)(1) each application for a new license and any competing license 
applications must be filed with the Commission at least 24 months prior 
to the expiration of the existing license. All applications for license 
for this project must be filed by March 31, 2003.
    m. A copy of the notice of intent is available for inspection and 
reproduction at the Commission's Public Reference Room, located at 888 
First Street, NE, Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426, or by calling (202) 
208-1371. The notice may be viewed on http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call (202) 208-2222 for assistance). A copy is also available 
for inspection and reproduction at the address in item h above.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-12329 Filed 5-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 102.154 Exceptions to Administrative Law Judge's decision; briefs; action of the Board.

Procedures before the Board, including the filing of exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge's decision and briefs, and action by the Board, will be in accordance with §§ 102.46, 102.47, 102.48, and 102.50. The Board will issue a decision on the application or remand the proceeding to the Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings.

[82 FR 11783, Feb. 24, 2017]
#### § 1471.980 Participant.

*Participant* means any person who submits a proposal for or who enters into a covered transaction, including an agent or representative of a participant.
EXHIBIT 32

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Virginia corporation (the Company), for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such
officers knowledge, that:



|1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in the Report.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.



|                         |  |  |  |                           
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------
|Dated: November 10, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    Michael E. Campbell
|                         |  |  |  | Michael E. Campbell       
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer   
|                         |  | 
|Dated: November 10, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    Steven C. Giuliano 
|                         |  |  |  | Steven C. Giuliano        
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Arch Chemicals, Inc.
and will be retained by Arch Chemicals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 1690.309 Interpretation of the Order.

Subject to the dispute resolution procedures set forth above and in accordance with the objectives set forth in 1-201 and the procedures in 1-303 of the Order, the EEOC shall interpret the meaning and intent of the Order. EEOC also will issue procedural changes under the Order, as appropriate, after advice and consultation with affected agencies as provided for in these procedures.
#### § 1903.5 Entry not a waiver.

Any permission to enter, inspect, review records, or question any person, shal not imply or be conditioned upon a waiver of any cause of action, citation, or penalty under the Act. Compliance Safety and Health Officers are not authorized to grant any such waiver.
In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting.

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communications Systems (1196).                     

*Date & Time:*                         February 17, 2000; 8:30 AM-5:00 PM.                    

*Place:*                        Room 730, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.                     

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                     

*Contact Persons:*                         Dr. James W. Mink, Program Director, Electronics, Photonics, and Device Technologies (EPDT), Division of Electrical and Communications Systems, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Room 675, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1339.                     

*Purpose of Meeting:*                        To provide advice and recommendations concerning future directions of the NSF programs in the areas of the Tether-Free World and Wireless Technology. The goal is to stimulate fundamental research that will enable broader application of the emerging tether-free environment.                     

*Agenda:*                        To review the current state of the art to establish base line discussions and to develop fundamental research objectives that will greatly expand wireless technology into a seamless environment for broad based data transmission, sensing and control systems applications.                    

Dated: January 13, 2000. 

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-1239 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7255-01-M
§ 1910.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) Section 6(a) of the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1593) provides that “without regard to chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, or to the other subsections of this section, the Secretary shall, as soon as practicable during the period beginning with the effective date of this Act and ending 2 years after such date, by rule promulgate as an occupational safety or health standard any national concensus standard, and any established Federal standard, unless he determines that the promulgation of such a standard would not result in improved safety or health for specifically designated employees.” The legislative purpose of this provision is to establish, as rapidly as possible and without regard to the rule-making provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, standards with which industries are generally familiar, and on whose adoption interested and affected persons have already had an opportunity to express their views. Such standards are either ( 1 ) national concensus standards on whose adoption affected persons have reached substantial agreement, or
( 2 ) Federal standards already established by Federal statutes or regulations.
( b ) This part carries out the directive to the Secretary of Labor under section 6(a) of the Act. It contains occupational safety and health standards which have been found to be national consensus standards or established Federal standards.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo,*                     or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                 

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​. 

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 31, 2000. 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco**                     (Maria Villanueva, Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:                 

*1. Equitable PCI Bank, Inc.*, Makati City, Philippines; to acquire PCI Express Padala, Inc., Los Angeles, California, and thereby to engage in money remittance activities, previously approved by Board Order in                     *Norwest Corporation*, 81 Federal Reserve Bulletin 1130 (1995).                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 11, 2000. 

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-12410 Filed 5-16-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P