alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Take notice that, on May 24, 2000, Edward Cazalet, of Automated Power Exchange, Inc., will make a presentation before the Commission, interested members of the staff, and interested members of the public demonstrating the possible use of e-commerce technologies and the Internet to develop markets for various power products, including transmission rights.

The presentation will be held on May 24, 2000, at 10:00 a.m., in the Commission Meeting Room, 2nd Floor, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-12213 Filed 5-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Daniel Dror, CEO, President and
Chairman of American International Industries, Inc, a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the
following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
with respect to the following quarterly report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended March 31, 2006.

The undersigned certifies that the above report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and information contained in the above report fairly presents, in all respects, the
financial condition of American International Industries, Inc. and results of its
operations.

Date: May 31, 2006
Daniel Dror
CEO, President and Chairman/s/ Daniel Dror
**Exhibit23.1**

July 12, 2005

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

450 5th StreetN.W

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies/Gentlemen,

Re. Kenilworth Systems Corporation

               Form 10-K/A,Amendment No.1, y/e* *12/31/04

We concur with therestated financial statements contained therein and, audited by us. Theoriginal Form 10-K contained unaudited financial statements. Our audit forthe period ended December 31, 2004 of the restated financial statementswas not completed until June 17, 2005.
| /s/  Demetrius & Company, |
|------------------------------------|
| L.L.C.                             |
|                               |
| JAD:jad                            |

 

----
# EUR-Lex - 32000D0162 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000D0162

**2000/162/EC: Commission Decision of 14 February 2000 amending Council Decision 79/542/EEC drawing up a list of third countries from which the Member States authorise imports of bovine animals, swine, equidae, sheep and goats, fresh meat and meat products (notified under document number C(2000) 287) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 051 , 24/02/2000 P. 0041 - 0045 *

COMMISSION DECISION

of 14 February 2000

amending Council Decision 79/542/EEC drawing up a list of third countries from which the Member States authorise imports of bovine animals, swine, equidae, sheep and goats, fresh meat and meat products

(notified under document number C(2000) 287)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2000/162/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine ovine and caprine animals and swine, fresh meat or meat products from third countries(1), as last amended by Directive 97/79/EC(2), and in particular Article 3 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Council Decision 79/542/EEC(3), as last amended by Commission Decision 2000/2/EC(4), draws up a list of third countries from which the Member States authorise imports of bovine animals, swine, equidae, sheep and goats, fresh meat and meat products.

(2) Commission Decision 2000/159/EC(5) establishes a provisional approval of residue plans of third countries according to Council Directive 96/23/EC(6).

(3) The Annex to Decision 79/542/EEC must be amended accordingly.

(4) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Part I of the Annex to Decision 79/542/EEC is replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 February 2000.

For the Commission

David BYRNE

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 302, 31.12.1972, p. 28.

(2) OJ L 24, 30.1.1998, p. 31.

(3) OJ L 146, 14.6.1979, p. 15.

(4) OJ L 1, 4.1.2000, p. 17.

(5) See page 30 of this Official Journal.

(6) OJ L 125, 25.5.1996, p. 10.
[No. 20439-1-III.

Division Three.

October 24, 2002.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Chris Cardon, *Respondent,*and Valerie Evans, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Asotin County, No. 99-3-00084-5, William D. Acey, J., entered August 9, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kato, J., concurred in by Brown, C.J., and Schultheis, J.
§ 1956.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part sets forth procedures and requirements for approval, continued evaluation, and operation of State plans submitted under section 18 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 667) (hereinafter called the Act) for the development and enforcement of State standards applicable to State and local government employees in States without approved private employee plans. Although section 2(b) of the Act sets forth the policy of assuring every working man and woman safe and healthful working conditions, State and local government agencies are excluded from the definition of “employer” in section 3(5). Only under section 18 of the Act are such public employees ensured protection under the provisions of an approved State plan. Where no such plan is in effect with regard to private employees, State and local government employees have not heretofore been assured any protections under the Act. Section 18(b), however, permits States to submit plans with respect to any occupational safety and health issue with respect to which a Federal standard has been promulgated under section 6 of the Act. Under § 1902.2(c) of this chapter, an issue is defined as “any * * * industrial, occupational, or hazard grouping that is found to be administratively practicable and * * * not in conflict with the purposes of the Act.” Since Federal standards are in effect with regard to hazards found in public employment, a State plan covering this occupational category meets the definition of section 18 and the regulations. It is the purpose of this part to assure the availability of the protections of the Act to public employees, where no State plan covering private employees is in effect, by adapting the requirements and procedures applicable to State plans covering private employees to the situation where State coverage under section 18(b) is proposed for public employees only.
( b ) In adopting these requirements and procedures, consideration should be given to differences between public and private employment. For instance, a system of monetary penalties applicable to violations of public employers may not in all cases be necessarily the most appropriate method of achieving compliance. Further, the impact of the lack of Federal enforcement authority application to public employers requires certain adjustments of private employer plan procedures in adapting them to plans covering only public employees in a State.
§ 91.701 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart applies to the operations of civil aircraft of U.S. registry outside of the United States and the operations of foreign civil aircraft within the United States.
( b ) Section 91.702 of this subpart also applies to each person on board an aircraft operated as follows: ( 1 ) A U.S. registered civil aircraft operated outside the United States;
( 2 ) Any aircraft operated outside the United States— ( i ) That has its next scheduled destination or last place of departure in the United States if the aircraft next lands in the United States; or
( ii ) If the aircraft lands in the United States with the individual still on the aircraft regardless of whether it was a scheduled or otherwise planned landing site.
[Doc. No. FAA-1998-4954, 64 FR 1079, Jan. 7, 1999]
§ 703.19 Investment pilot program. ( a ) Under the investment pilot program, NCUA will permit a limited number of Federal credit unions to engage in investment activities prohibited by this part but permitted by the Act.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, before a Federal credit union may engage in additional activities it must obtain written approval from NCUA. To obtain approval, a Federal credit union must submit a request to its regional director that addresses the following items: ( 1 ) Certification that the Federal credit union is “well-capitalized” under part 702 of this chapter;
( 2 ) Board policies approving the activities and establishing limits on them;
( 3 ) A complete description of the activities, with specific examples of how they will benefit the Federal credit union and how they will be conducted;
( 4 ) A demonstration of how the activities will affect the Federal credit union's financial performance, risk profile, and asset-liability management strategies;
( 5 ) Examples of reports the Federal credit union will generate to monitor the activities;
( 6 ) Projections of the associated costs of the activities, including personnel, computer, audit, and so forth;
( 7 ) Descriptions of the internal systems that will measure, monitor, and report the activities;
( 8 ) Qualifications of the staff and officials responsible for implementing and overseeing the activities; and
( 9 ) Internal control procedures that will be implemented, including audit requirements.
( c ) A third-party seeking approval of an investment pilot program must submit a request to the Director of the Office of Capital Markets and Planning that addresses the following items: ( 1 ) A complete description of the activities with specific examples of how a credit union will conduct and account for them, and how they will benefit a Federal credit union;
( 2 ) A description of any risks to a Federal credit union from participating in the program; and
( 3 ) Contracts that must be executed by the Federal credit union.
( d ) A Federal credit union need not obtain individual written approval to engage in investment activities prohibited by this part but permitted by statute where the activities are part of a third-party investment program that NCUA has approved under this section.
[68 FR 32960, June 3, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 39832, July 1, 2004; 70 FR 55517, Sept. 22, 2005]
NO. 07-00-0287-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	DECEMBER 5, 2000

	______________________________

	GUILLERMO SALDANA,

			Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

			Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 242ND DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY;

	NO. B12664-9704; HON. EDWARD L. SELF, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

	Guillermo Saldana (appellant) appeals from a judgment revoking his probation for driving while intoxicated and sentencing him to three years imprisonment.  However, his appointed legal counsel filed an Anders brief wherein he represented to this Court that he had diligently reviewed the record and found no reversible error.1  So too did he  serve appellant with a copy of the brief, inform his client of his right to continue pro se, and move to withdraw as counsel.  On October 27, 2000, appellant was advised, via letter from the clerk of this Court, of his right to submit a pro se response by November 27, 2000.  To date, no response has been filed.

	  In his brief, appellate counsel discussed the burden imposed upon the State and the standard of review applicable to the court’s decision.  In addressing both, appellate counsel concluded that there was no arguable ground for appeal.  We have conducted our own independent review of the record to assess the accuracy of counsel’s representation, see Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (requiring same), and agree with his assessment.  No arguable error appears of record.   

	Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw from representing appellant and affirm the judgment of the trial court. 

								Brian Quinn 

                                            				    Justice 

Do not publish.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Joyce Clark, certify that:

 

1.                  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Kenilworth Systems Corporation;

 

2.                  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements are made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)                Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)               Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)                Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)                 All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)                Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: March 30,   2011 | By:    | /s/   Joyce Clark                                 |
|----------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                             |   | Director,   Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.1083 Post-dive procedures.

Note:

The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.423 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-1910.423).

[[61 FR 31432](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31432), June 20, 1996]
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Gino Scotto, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K of Kenilworth Systems Corporation;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements are made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e))  for the registrant and have:

 

a)             Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures or caused such disclosure controls to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)            Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)             Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  May 10, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Gino Scotto         |   |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
§ 61.49 Retesting after failure. ( a ) An applicant for a knowledge or practical test who fails that test may reapply for the test only after the applicant has received: ( 1 ) The necessary training from an authorized instructor who has determined that the applicant is proficient to pass the test; and
( 2 ) An endorsement from an authorized instructor who gave the applicant the additional training.
( b ) An applicant for a flight instructor certificate with an airplane category rating or, for a flight instructor certificate with a glider category rating, who has failed the practical test due to deficiencies in instructional proficiency on stall awareness, spin entry, spins, or spin recovery must: ( 1 ) Comply with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section before being retested;
( 2 ) Bring an aircraft to the retest that is of the appropriate aircraft category for the rating sought and is certificated for spins; and
( 3 ) Demonstrate satisfactory instructional proficiency on stall awareness, spin entry, spins, and spin recovery to an examiner during the retest.
#### AMERICAN HEALTH & ACCIDENT INS. CO. v. McMATTHEWS.

(Decided December 14, 1915.)

Appeal from Birmingham City Court.

Heard before Hon. H. A. Sharpe.

No counsel marked for appellant. Allen, Bell & Sadler, for appellee.

Pelham, P. J.

Affirmed for want of assignment of error.
§ 18.405 Methods of proving character. ( a ) *Reputation of opinion.* In all cases in which evidence of character or a trait of character of a person is admissible, proof may be made by testimony as to reputation or by testimony in the form of an opinion. On cross-examination, inquiry is allowable into relevant specific instances of conduct.
( b ) *Specific instances of conduct.* In cases in which character or a trait of character of a person is an essential element of a claim or defense, proof may also be made of specific instances of that person's conduct.
Exhibit
32.1  Section 1350 Certification





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens First Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, M. Todd
Kanipe, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
            /s/   M. Todd
    KanipeM.
      Todd KanipeInterim
      President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
            May
      14, 2009





This
certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed ‘filed” for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability
of that section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section.