alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Frank Walton, Pl’ff, *v.*Julian D. Fairchild, Def't.

*(City Court of New York,*

*Special Term,*

*Filed March 25, 1889.)*

Attorney and client—Disclosing client’s- addi ss.

An "attorney cannot be compelled to disclose his client’s address after the litigation has finally terminated; for the only penalty for refusing the information is to stay the client’s proceeding, or strike out his plea.

Motion to compel plaintiff’s attorney to disclose the address of his client.

*E. B. Merrill,*for motion; *W. W. Badger,*opposed.

McAdam, Ch. J.

There is no doubt as to the authority of the court to direct a plaintiff’s attorney to disclose his client’s address, but the power should be exercised during the pend-ency of the action, and while the relation of attorney and client actually exists. The penalty for refusing the information is visited on the client by staying his action, or if a defendant, by striking out his plea. Tidd’s Pr. Am. Notes, 533, 534, and see *Ninety-nine Plaintiffs*v. *Vanderbilt*(1 Abb. Pr., 193).

But no punishment is inflicted on the attorney, who is the mere confidential agent of the client supposed to be acting by his command. The court will not permit the client to use the machinery of the law for his benefit with*315out disclosing his identity and address, if such disclosure is nec issary for the due and orderly administration of justice. The present application is to discover the plaintiff’s address. The objection urged is that the action has terminated in a judgment for the defendant, which was affirmed on appeal, with which affirmance the litigation finally closed. . The relation of attorney and client has ceased, so far as this action is concerned, but the seal of confidence imposed by the cri final relation continues, and the attorney cannot now be compelled to disclose his late client’s address for the mere purpose of enabling the defendant to pursue him aggressively by new proceedings founded on the judgment. The same question arose in *Hooper*v. *Harcourt*(1 H. Black., 534), and the court was of opinion that the application ought to have been made in a more early stage of the cause, and came too late after verdict, an attorney not being obliged to expose his client to be taken in execution. The plaintiff has no proceeding to stay, the application comes too late, and the motion to compel the attorney to disclose his client’s address must be denied. No costs.
----- Forwarded by Nicole Law/R9/USEPA/US on 11/25/2009 02:27 PM -----

From: "Joven Nazareno" <joven.nazareno@valleyair.org>

To: Nicole Law/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "George Heinen" <george.heinen@valleyair.org>, "Errol Villegas" <errol.villegas@valleyair.org>

Date: 07/23/2009 02:35 PM

Subject: RE: Rule 4603 AND 4612

Hi Nicole,

Based on our permit database there are about 300 permitted sources subject to R 4603. I reviewed the 

latest annual inspection reports and found that only one facility out of 300 is using extreme performance 

coating. The facility ( Guntert & Zimmerman: Permit No. N-380) uses 884.76 gallons per year of Sherwin 

Williams topcoat which is an extreme performance coating and the facility is Air-dried operation. Its 

VOC limit is 3.38 lb/gal which is below the 3.5 lb/gal limit for air-dried extreme performance coating. 

Please note that the 2008 CTG for miscellaneous metal and plastic parts and products recommended 

limit for air-dried is also 3.5 lb/gal. We do not have any baked extreme performance coating operation 

that would be subject to the CTG limit of 3.0 lb/gal limit. Nonetheless, our current rulemaking to 

incorporate the 2008 CTG will lower the existing baked extreme performance coating limit from 3.5 to 3.0 

lb/gal. In addition, we are also proposing to remove the existing exemption for touch and repair coating 

and set the same limit as the CTG at 3.0 for baked and 3.5 for air dried. Hope this helps in answering the 

comments submitted to EPA by EarthJustice. 

Regards

Joe

Joven R. Nazareno

Senior Air Quality Engineer

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

1990 E. Gettysburg Ave., Fresno, CA 93726

Phone: (559) 230-6100

From: Law.Nicole@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Law.Nicole@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 1:29 PM

To: Joven Nazareno

Subject: Rule 4603 AND 4612

Hello Joe,

As you know, I am responding to comments from EarthJustice regarding my recent proposed approval on 

rules 4603, 4604, and 4612. I wanted to see if you could provide me with a little bit more information on 

the category of extreme performance coatings. I know you told me that inspection reports indicated only 

one facility uses these coatings. Do those reports also give you an idea of how much of this coating is 

used? I know you said you'd check this, and can recall doing actual emission calculations. Those would 

be great as well. 

Moving onto rule 4612, I would like to get some information regarding the usage of precoat category and 

the topcoat-metallic/iridescent category. I am not sure if you are the contact person for this rule, but if 

you are, I would be interested in getting an idea of how large these categories are compared to the other 
categories in the rule. Thank you very much Joe!

-Nicole

Nicole Law

Rulemaking Office, Air Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, 94105

Office: (415) 947-4126

Fax: (415) 947-3579
§ 1919.9 Reconsideration and review. ( a ) Any person aggrieved by the action of the Assistant Secretary or his authorized representative in denying, granting, suspending or revoking an accreditation under this part may within 15 days after such action, ( 1 ) file a written request for reconsideration thereof by the Assistant Secretary or the authorized representative of the Assistant Secretary who made the decision in the first instance, or
( 2 ) file a written request for review of the decision by the Assistant Secretary or an authorized representative of the Assistant Secretary, who has taken no part in the action which is the subject for review.
( b ) A request for reconsideration shall be granted where the applicant shows that there is additional evidence which may materially affect the decision and that there were reasonable grounds for failure to adduce such evidence in the original proceedings.
( c ) Any person aggrieved by the action of the Assistant Secretary or authorized representative of the Assistant Secretary in denying a request for reconsideration may, within 15 days after the denial of such request, file with the Assistant Secretary or his authorized representative a written request for review.
( d ) Any person aggrieved by the reconsidered determination of the Assistant Secretary or authorized representative of the Assistant Secretary, may within 15 days after such determination, file with the Assistant Secretary a written request for review.
( e ) A request for review shall be granted where reasonable grounds for the review are set forth in the request.
( f ) If a request for reconsideration or review is granted, all interested persons shall be afforded an opportunity to present their views.
( g ) No cargo gear certification function shall be performed by any person seeking reconsideration or review under this section pending the final decision with respect to such reconsideration or review.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
REGISTRANT'S  SECOND  QUARTER 2000 BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          20,624
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    141,139
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               208,241
<PP&E>                                         326,064
<DEPRECIATION>                                 301,074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 233,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,673
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,009,783
<OTHER-SE>                                   (802,225)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   233,231
<SALES>                                        204,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               204,259
<CGS>                                          101,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  130,462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,646)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (27,646)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,646)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23

CONSENTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-86722 and 33-52357-99 of The Laclede Group, Inc., and 333-86722-01 of
Laclede Capital Trust I on Form S-3, and in Registration Statement Nos.
333-90248, 333-90252, 333-90254, 333-91432, 333-102835, and 333-102836 of
The Laclede Group, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated November 18, 2005,
relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of The
Laclede Group, Inc., and management's report on the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of The Laclede Group, Inc. and Laclede Gas Company for the year
ended September 30, 2005.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-40362 of Laclede Gas Company on Form S-3 of our report dated
November 18, 2005, relating to the financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Laclede Gas Company and management's report on the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in
Exhibit 99.1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Laclede Group, Inc.
and Laclede Gas Company for the year ended September 30, 2005.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
November 18, 2005
§ 1952.27 Illinois. ( a ) The Illinois State plan for state and local government employees received initial approval from the Assistant Secretary on September 1, 2009.
( b ) The Plan further provides assurances of a fully trained, adequate staff within three years of plan approval, including 11 safety and 3 health compliance officers for enforcement inspections, and 3 safety and 2 health consultants to perform consultation services in the public sector. The state has assured that it will continue to provide a sufficient number of adequately trained and qualified personnel necessary for the enforcement of standards as required by 29 CFR 1956.10. The state has also given satisfactory assurance of adequate funding to support the Plan.
( c ) The plan only covers State and local government employers and employees within the state. For additional details about the plan, please visit *http://www.osha.gov/dcsp/osp/stateprogs/illinois.html .*
§ 1921.3 Complaints. ( a ) *Issuance.* The Deputy Solicitor of Labor shall institute enforcement proceedings by issuing a complaint and causing the complaint to be served upon the respondent.
( b ) *Contents.* The complaint shall contain a clear and concise factual statement sufficient to inform the respondent with reasonable definiteness of the types of acts or practices alleged to have occurred and to violate section 41 of the Act or the provisions of parts 1915 and 1918 of this subtitle.
( c ) *Amendments.* At any time prior to the close of the hearing, the complaint may be amended in the discretion of the hearing examiner and on such terms as he may approve.
( d ) *Notice of hearing.* The hearing examiner shall notify the parties of the time and place for a hearing within 10 days after the service of the complaint.
#### §§ 91.615-91.699 [Reserved]
PMN Sanitized file of Daphnia magna 48-hour acute toxicity study
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 877 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 877

 To amend the Controlled Substances Act to add human growth hormone to 
  schedule III, to prohibit the sale of prescriptions for controlled 
     substances for illegitimate purposes, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2007

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Controlled Substances Act to add human growth hormone to 
  schedule III, to prohibit the sale of prescriptions for controlled 
     substances for illegitimate purposes, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Controlling the Abuse of 
Prescriptions Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. HUMAN GROWTH HORMONE.

    (a) In General.--Schedule III of section 202(c) of the Controlled 
Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812(c)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(f) Growth hormone, recombinant human growth hormone, or human 
growth hormone.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 3. BAD FAITH SALE OF PRESCRIPTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Part D of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 
841 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 424. BAD FAITH SALE OF PRESCRIPTIONS.

    ``(a) Offense.--It shall be unlawful for any practitioner to 
knowingly sell, or otherwise transfer or deliver in exchange for 
anything of pecuniary value, a prescription for a controlled substance, 
other than in good faith in the course of the professional practice of 
that practitioner.
    ``(b) Penalty.--Any practitioner that violates subsection (a) shall 
be fined under title 18, United States Code, imprisoned not more than 5 
years, or both.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of contents for 
the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) is amended by 
inserting after the item relating to section 423 the following:

``Sec. 424. Bad faith sale of prescriptions.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1472.230 How and when must I identify workplaces? ( a ) You must identify all known workplaces under each FMCS award. A failure to do so is a violation of your drug-free workplace requirements. You may identify the workplaces_ ( 1 ) To the FMCS official that is making the award, either at the time of application or upon award; or
( 2 ) In documents that you keep on file in your offices during the performance of the award, in which case you must make the information available for inspection upon request by FMCS officials or their designated representatives.
( b ) Your workplace identification for an award must include the actual address of buildings (or parts of buildings) or other sites where work under the award takes place. Categorical descriptions may be used (*e.g.,* all vehicles of a mass transit authority or State highway department while in operation, State employees in each local unemployment office, performers in concert halls or radio studios).
( c ) If you identified workplaces to the FMCS awarding official at the time of application or award, as described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and any workplace that you identified changes during the performance of the award, you must inform the FMCS awarding official.
# EUR-Lex - 31997F0625(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31997F0625(01)

**Council Act of 26 May 1997 drawing up, on the basis of Article K.3 (2) (c) of the Treaty on European Union, the Convention on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union **

*
Official Journal C 195 , 25/06/1997 P. 0001 - 0001 *

COUNCIL ACT of 26 May 1997 drawing up, on the basis of Article K.3 (2) (c) of the Treaty on European Union, the Convention on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union (97/C 195/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article K.3 (2) (c) thereof,

Whereas the Member States regard the improvement of judicial cooperation as a matter of common interest coming under the cooperation provided for in Title VI of the Treaty;

Whereas, to that end, it is necessary to draw up a Convention on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union in the light of the provisions of the Protocol to the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities' Financial Interests (1);

HAVING DECIDED that the Convention, the text of which is attached and which is signed this day by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union, is hereby drawn up;

RECOMMENDS that it be adopted by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

Done at Brussels, 26 May 1997.

For the Council

The President

W. SORGDRAGER

(1) OJ No C 313, 23. 10. 1996, p. 2.
§ 1902.21 Tentative decision following formal proceeding. ( a ) On the basis of the whole record of any hearing held under § 1902.14 or § 1902.19, the Assistant Secretary shall issue a tentative decision either approving or disapproving the plan. The tentative decision shall include a statement of the findings and conclusions and reasons or bases therefor on all material issues of fact, law, or discretion which have been presented. The tentative decision shall be published in the Federal Register.
( b ) The State agency and other interested persons participating in the hearing may waive the tentative decision. In such event the Assistant Secretary shall issue a final decision under § 1902.22.
Fourth Amendment to the Hub and Line-Haul Services Agreement



 Exhibit 10.11 
 November 11, 2009 
 VIA FACSIMILE TO (954) 888-7310

 & DHL EXPRESS 
 DHL
Express (USA), Inc. 
 1200 South Pine Island Road 
 Plantation, Florida 33324 
 Attention: Jon E. Olin – EVP, General Counsel & Secretary

  

	Re:	Fourth Amendment to the Hub and Line-Haul Services Agreement, by and between DHL Express (USA), Inc., as successor in interest to Airborne, Inc.
(“Groundco”) and ABX Air, Inc. (“Airco”), dated August 15, 2003, as previously amended on April 27, 2004, August 8, 2005 and November 9, 2008 (the “Hub Services Agreement”).


 Dear Jon: 
 This letter is intended to confirm the agreement between Groundco and Airco to amend the Hub Services Agreement in order to accommodate the requirements of each other. 
 Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Hub Services Agreement.

 The Hub Services Agreement is hereby amended, modified and/or confirmed as follows: 
 (a) Airco and Groundco agree that, notwithstanding the expiration of the Hub Services Agreement on August 15, 2009,
Airco shall, in accordance with Section 5.12(a) of the Hub Services Agreement, submit to Groundco a statement of costs incurred through the fourth quarter of 2009, solely with respect to workers’ compensation reserves. Thereupon, any
Reconciliation Payment owing to either party for the fourth quarter with respect to workers’ compensation reserves, shall be determined in accordance with Section 5.12(a) of the Hub Services Agreement. 
 Nothing in this letter shall be deemed an agreement by DHL to any workers compensation reserve amount or the amount of any workers
compensation expense of Airco for any period. 
 Except to the extent specifically provided herein, nothing in this letter of
amendment shall be deemed to renew, novate, amend, extend the term of, or provide any rights or impose any obligations on any party hereto or any of their respective affiliates pursuant to, the Hub Services Agreement, which expired by its own terms
on August 15, 2009. 
  







 Jon E. Olin 
 November 11, 2009 
 2 of 2 
 Please acknowledge Groundco’s acceptance of the foregoing by having an authorized representative of DHL Express (USA), Inc. sign and
date this letter of amendment in the space provided below and returning one counterpart to me for my records. 
  

	
	 Sincerely,
  
 ABX Air, Inc.

	
	/s/ W. Joseph Payne
	 W. Joseph Payne
 Vice
President
 General Counsel & Secretary



  
  

			
	 ACCEPTED AND AGREED: (as amended)
  
 DHL Express (USA), Inc.

	
	/s/ Jon E. Olin
		
	By:	 	Jon E. Olin
		
	Its:	 	SVP
		
	Date:	 	November 12, 2009
#### § 1915.120 Powered industrial truck operator training.

Note:

The requirements applicable to shipyard employment under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.178(l) of this chapter](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-1910.178#p-1910.178(l)).

[[63 FR 66274](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/63-FR-66274), Dec. 1, 1998]
§ 1986.107 Hearings. ( a ) Except as provided in this part, proceedings will be conducted in accordance with the rules of practice and procedure for administrative hearings before the Office of Administrative Law Judges, codified at subpart A of part 18 of this title.
( b ) Upon receipt of an objection and request for hearing, the Chief Administrative Law Judge will promptly assign the case to an ALJ who will notify the parties of the day, time, and place of hearing. The hearing is to commence expeditiously, except upon a showing of good cause or unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. Hearings will be conducted de novo on the record. ALJs have broad discretion to limit discovery in order to expedite the hearing.
( c ) If both the complainant and the respondent object to the findings and/or order, the objections will be consolidated, and a single hearing will be conducted.
( d ) Formal rules of evidence will not apply, but rules or principles designed to assure production of the most probative evidence will be applied. The ALJ may exclude evidence that is immaterial, irrelevant, or unduly repetitious.
[81 FR 63409, Sept. 15, 2016, as amended at 86 FR 1793, Jan. 11, 2021]
#### George M. Clarke, Appellant, *v.*Stephen H. Gordon et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.

Argued January 11, 1937;

decided January 26, 1937.

*519
      *Ransom H. Gillett*for appellant.

*John Bright*and Abram *F. Servin*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: Finch, J.