alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Herbert Lindo, certifythat:

1.    Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Kenilworth SystemsCorporation;

2.    Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements are made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.    Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.    Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures orcaused such disclosure controls to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annualreport is being prepared;

b)    Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)    Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)    Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)    Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 
| Date: August 25, 2006 |   | By:    |                                 | /s/ Herbert Lindo |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|-------------------|
|                       |   |   | Chairman and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### In the Matter of The City of New York, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title to Lands in the Borough of the Bronx as a Site for the Triborough Bridge. 122 Cypress Avenue Holding Corporation, Appellant.

Argued May 18, 1937;

decided June 1, 1937.

*582
      *Sidney S. Levine*for appellant.

*Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel (William S. Gaud, Jr., Paxton Blair*and *Alfred D. Jahr*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Lotjghran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1219

JOSEPH V. VEIGA, III; SUSAN M. VEIGA, on their own behalf 

and on behalf of all others similarly situated; MARY 

KENDALL,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v.

SUNTRUST BANK,

Defendant – Appellee,

v.

AARON HOLSEY,

Movant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Paul W. Grimm, Magistrate Judge. 

(1:09-cv-02815-PWG)

Submitted: September 30, 2011 Decided: October 17, 2011

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron Holsey, Appellant Pro Se. Harold G. Belkowitz, OBER, 

KALER, GRIMES & SHRIVER, PC, Washington, D.C.; Diane Festino 

Schmitt, OBER, KALER, GRIMES & SHRIVER, PC, Baltimore, Maryland, 
2

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Holsey appeals the order of the magistrate judge

approving the settlement of this class action lawsuit and 

rejecting Holsey’s objection to the settlement. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. 

Veiga v. Holsey, No. 1:09-cv-02815-PWG (D. Md. filed Feb. 23, 

2011, entered Feb. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 102.136 Establishment and use of advisory committees.

Advisory committees may from time to time be established or used by the Agency in the interest of obtaining advice or recommendations on issues of concern to the Agency. The establishment, use, and functioning of such committees will be in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, applicable Rules and Regulations.

[82 FR 11779, Feb. 24, 2017]
#### § 1905.5 Effect of variances.

All variances granted pursuant to this part shall have only future effect. In his discretion, the Assistant Secretary may decline to entertain an application for a variance on a subject or issue concerning which a citation has been issued to the employer involved and a proceeding on the citation or a related issue concerning a proposed penalty or period of abatement is pending before the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission or appropriate State review authority until the completion of such proceeding.

[36 FR 12290, June 30, 1971, as amended at 40 FR 25449, June 16, 1975]
§ 1612.9 Legal Counsel's certification in closing a meeting. ( a ) Upon any proper request made pursuant to this part, that the agency close a meeting or portion(s) thereof, the Legal Counsel shall certify in writing to the agency, whether in his or her opinion the closing of a meeting or portion(s) thereof is proper under the provisions of this part and the terms of the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b). If, in the opinion of the Legal Counsel, a meeting or portion(s) thereof is proper for closing under this part and the terms of the Government in the Sunshine Act, his or her certification of that opinion shall cite each applicable particular exemption of that Act and provision of this part.
( b ) A copy of the certification of the Legal Counsel as described in paragraph (a) of this section together with a statement of the presiding officer of the meeting setting forth the time and place of the relevant meeting or meetings, and the persons present, shall be maintained by the agency in a public file.
[42 FR 13830, Mar. 14, 1977, as amended at 47 FR 46276, Oct. 18, 1982]
§ 1209.01 Scope and purpose. ( a ) The provisions of this part are intended to implement the requirements of section 3(a) of the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.
( b ) It is the policy of the National Mediation Board that the public is entitled to the fullest practicable information regarding its decisionmaking processes. It is the purpose of this part to provide the public with such information while protecting the rights of individuals and the ability of the agency to carry out its responsibilities.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4896 

To authorize certain Federal departments to enter into contracts to carry 

out existing authorities to protect United States facilities from unmanned 

aircraft. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2020 

Mr. LEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize certain Federal departments to enter into contracts to carry out existing authorities to protect United 

States facilities from unmanned aircraft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enhanced Protection 

5 from Unmanned Aircraft Attacks Act of 2020’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4896 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS TO PRO2 TECT FACILITIES FROM UNMANNED AIR3 CRAFT. 

4 (a) AUTHORITY.—The following Federal departments 

5 are authorized to enter into contracts to carry out the fol6 lowing authorities: 

7 (1) The Department of Defense for the purpose 

8 of carrying out activities under section 130i of title 

9 10, United States Code. 

10 (2) The Department of Homeland Security for 

11 the purpose of carrying out activities under section 

12 210G of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 

13 U.S.C. 124n). 

14 (3) The Department of Justice for the purpose 

15 of carrying out activities under section 210G of the 

16 Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 124n). 

17 (4) The Department of Energy for the purpose 

18 of carrying out activities under section 4510 of the 

19 Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2661). 

20 (b) FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION.—Not later 

21 than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

22 the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council shall amend 

23 the Federal Acquisition Regulation to implement the au24 thority provided under subsection (a). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act Rule 13a-14,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  6.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ProLink Holdings Corp.7.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;8.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;9.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (f)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to we, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(g)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(h)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 10.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on out most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 (i)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of the internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and(j)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or the other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Michael S. BrowneMichael S. BrowneChief Operating Officer and
Chief 
Financial Officer
#### § 1910.35 Compliance with alternate exit-route codes.

OSHA will deem an employer demonstrating compliance with the exit-route provisions of NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 2009 edition, or the exit-route provisions of the International Fire Code, 2009 edition, to be in compliance with the corresponding requirements in §§ 1910.34, 1910.36, and 1910.37 (incorporated by reference, see section § 1910.6).

[76 FR 33606, June 8, 2011]
<PAGE>

                                                             EXHIBIT 13.1


                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with this annual report of Ultrapetrol (Bahamas) Limited (the
     "Company") on Form 20-F for the period  ending  December 31, 2005, as filed
     with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
     "Report"),  the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  hereby
     certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

     This  certification  is made solely for the  purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section
     1350, and not for any other purpose.

Dated:  April [   ], 2006

/s/ Felipe Menendez Ross
--------------------------------
Felipe Menendez Ross

Director, Chief Executive

Officer, and President
# EUR-Lex - 31995R1572 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995R1572

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1572/95 of 30 June 1995 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3537/89 on the marketing stage to which the average price for pig carcases refers **

*
Official Journal L 150 , 01/07/1995 P. 0052 - 0052 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1572/95 of 30 June 1995 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3537/89 on the marketing stage to which the average price for pig carcases refers

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organization of the market in pigmeat (1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 3290/94 (2), and in particular Article 4 (6) thereof,

Whereas Council Regulation (EC) No 1541/95 of 29 June 95 fixing the basic price and the standard quality for slaughtered pigs for the period 1 July 1995 to 30 June 1996 (3), has fixed grade E as the standard quality for carcases weighing 60 to less than 120 kilograms; whereas it is consequently necessary to introduce this modification into Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3537/89 (4), which fixes the standard of pig carcases to be used to determine the Community market price for pig carcases;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Pigmeat,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In the first indent of Article 2 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 3537/89, 'grade U` is replaced by 'grade E`.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 1995.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 1995.

For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission
p. 1


# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 102 ) ll-E-6 2 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:06

AM Sheet 102 of 26403/13/9 7 TH U 16:3 5 FA

X 60 1 24 5 448 9 02/28/9 7 15:5 7 ©1919941023 4 UNITE D TECH
. HUMA N RES
. PE S RT P N C @003/40 3 l_UU 2 P ? - I 

### A-94-52

From : Date : Contact : Company : Contac tRepor t Kennet h R. Meardon

, Pacifi c Environmenta

l Services , Inc . (PES ) Februar y 26,199 7 Mr . D . Pierc e Epe s Unite d Technologie

s Moto r System s Telephon e Number : (601 ) 245-436 7 Fa x Number : (601 ) 245448 9
ContactSummary : I n response t

o m y questio n concernin

g thei r ge l coatin g process , Mr

. Epe s indicated that : (1 ) th e mixtur e o f ge l coat , unsaturate

d polyeste r resin, an d styren e i s pumped/dribble

d ont o th e armatur e i n which the winding

s ar e locate d an d (2 ) th e ge l coat/resi

n mixtur e i s allowe d t o cur

e aroun d th e windings , i n som

e cases a troo m temperatur

e an d i n som e cas e wit h externa l hea t Mr . Epes sai d tha

tthe y hav e switche d som e o f thei r productio

n to vinyl toluene-based ge l coat s an d resins , bu

tar e stil l usin g som e styrene-base

d ge l coat s an d resins . He als o note

d tha tthe y hav e reduce d th e numbe

r o f line s i n whic

h thi s process occur

s t o 2 o r 3 lines . Mr . Epe s als o indicate

d tha tthi s process i s include

d i n their Titl e V permi

ta s a permitte

d sourc e o f VO C an d tha tth e facilit y i s a majo

r source, primaril

y du e to th e facility' s boilers .

INFORMATIO

N I S ACCURAT

E
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04331A021
#### § 1905.4 Amendments to this part.

The Assistant Secretary may at any time revise, amend, or revoke any provisions of this part, on his own motion or upon the written petition of any person.
#### § 93.121 Applicability.

This subpart designates high density traffic airports and prescribes air traffic rules for operating aircraft, other than helicopters, to or from those airports.

[Doc. No. 9974, 35 FR 16592, Oct. 24, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 93-27, 38 FR 29464, Oct. 25, 1973]
§ 91.819 Civil supersonic airplanes that do not comply with part 36. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to civil supersonic airplanes that have not been shown to comply with the Stage 2 noise limits of part 36 in effect on October 13, 1977, using applicable trade-off provisions, and that are operated in the United States, after July 31, 1978.
( b ) *Airport use.* Except in an emergency, the following apply to each person who operates a civil supersonic airplane to or from an airport in the United States: ( 1 ) Regardless of whether a type design change approval is applied for under part 21 of this chapter, no person may land or take off an airplane covered by this section for which the type design is changed, after July 31, 1978, in a manner constituting an “acoustical change” under § 21.93 unless the acoustical change requirements of part 36 are complied with.
( 2 ) No flight may be scheduled, or otherwise planned, for takeoff or landing after 10 p.m. and before 7 a.m. local time.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CURTIS PALMORE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 294 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


         KMART CORPORATION
         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


         In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kmart Corporation
for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2003, I, Julian C. Day, Chief Executive
Officer of Kmart Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

         1. this Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. the information contained in this Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Kmart
Corporation.


         Date: March 24, 2003

    /s/ Julian C. Day
    -------------------------
    Julian C. Day
    Chief Executive Officer
#### § 1610.30 Purpose and scope.

This subpart contains the regulations of the Commission concerning procedures to be followed when a subpena, order, or other demand (hereinafter in this subpart referred to as a “demand”) of a court or other authority is issued for the production or disclosure of (a) any material contained in the files of the Commission; (b) any information relating to material contained in the files of the Commission; or (c) any information or material acquired by any person while such person was an employee of the Commission as a part of the performance of his official duties or because of his official status.

[32 FR 16261, Nov. 29, 1967]
SCOTT'S HELICOPTER SERVICES 

FAA Approved Repair Station 

C.R.S. # CUHR 150S 

780 S. Elmwood Ave. 

P.O. Box 92, LE SUEUR, MN 56058 

507-665-4064 FAX# 507-665-3680 

June 15, 2011 

FAA Drug Abatement Division (AAIVI-800) 

800 Independence Avenue SW, Room 806 

Washington, DC 20591 

DearSirorlVladam, 

.-o 

> 

o 

O : 

O 

:z. 

^ Q . 

We are"reeyoesting^n exemption from needing t& mamtajft-twa Alcnhnl anri nri)g Prpvpntlnn Programs, 

We have a small FAR 135, "On Demand" Charter operation and a FAR 91 "Local Tour^ operation. Both 

operate under Scott's Helicopter Service Inc. We have 2 aircraft in the FAR 135 operation and 6 in the 

FAR 91 operation. Our pilot count carded for both FAR 135 and FAR 91 operations is 4. 

This situation gives these pilots the possibility of being randomly selected for testing for both operations 

at the same time. It as well more than doubles the expense to the company to maintain both programs. 

In that we are a small operation, this amounts to a financial hardship for us. 

I personally have direct oversight of the Alcohol and Drug Prevention Programs and can more than 

adequately manage all personnel under one program. I believe this will still meet the intended goals of 

the Alcohol and Drug prevention and monitoring for the Federal Aviation Administration. 

We are therefore requesting that an exemption be given, allowing us to have all company personnel in 

one Alcohol and Drug Prevention Program. 

If you have any concerns or question, please feel free to contact me at any of the following: 

Office: 507-665-4064 

Email: acctshs@mvclearwave.net 

T^ompanyTSata: ~ ~ ——^ ^— ^ -^---_—-__—- _ _-^.^_^ __ 

Scott's Helicopter Services, Inc., Le Sueur, MN 56058 (FAA Certificate # CUHA150S) 

Thanl< you for your time and consideration of this report. I lool< forward to hearing from you soon. 

Respectfully, 

Ann-Marie Sl<ubitz 

Human Resource Manager 

Scott's Helicopter Services, inc.