alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MÁS 2005

2007

Cómo comprar lentes de 

contacto en Internet, por 

teléfono o por correo 

Comprar lentes de contacto por 

Internet, por teléfono, o por correo 

puede ser práctico. Sin embargo, 

quienes opten por realizar su 

compra a través de estos medios 

deben tomar algunas precauciones. 

Usted necesitará una receta 

correcta y actualizada. Las leyes de 

cada estado establecen la fecha de 

vencimiento de las recetas. Algunos 

estados dejan la decisión a criterio 

de cada médico.

La receta debe incluir:

• Su nombre 

• Mediciones de las lentes 

• La marca y el material de la lente 

de contacto 

• El nombre de su médico 

Algunas recetas también indican: 

• Si las lentes son de uso diario o 

uso prolongado 

• Si puede utilizarse un tipo de 

material diferente para la lente 

• La fecha de vencimiento de la 

receta 

• El número de renovaciones 

Los sitios de Internet y empresas 

de venta por correo deben obtener 

la aprobación de la receta por 

parte de su médico. Si no lo hacen, 

infringen la ley federal. Es por eso 

que muchos solicitan el nombre 

y número de teléfono del médico. 

Algunos estados exigen recetas por 

escrito. 

Compre las lentes a una empresa 

conocida que sea confiable. 

Pida información por escrito 

acerca de las lentes de contacto al 

vendedor. Debe explicarle cómo 

usar las lentes y mencionar los 

riesgos y beneficios. 

No se arriesgue con una receta 

vieja

Su oftalmólogo le indicará con 

qué frecuencia debe realizarse 

controles. Concurra a las citas 

médicas en forma habitual. Los 

controles le brindan a su médico 

la posibilidad de revisar el ajuste 

de sus lentes y cambiar la receta 

a medida que sus ojos presentan 

modificaciones. Si las lentes no 

están bien ajustadas, podrían dañar 

sus ojos. 

Buying Contacts Online
FDA Office of Women’s Health http://www.fda.gov/womens

TAKE TIME TO CARE... For yourself, for those who need you.

Consulte siempre a su médico. El 

médico puede observar signos 

tempranos de lesiones que pueden 

causar problemas graves, e incluso 

la ceguera. Tal vez usted no advierta 

estos signos en sus etapas iniciales. 

Verifique que le enviaron el 

producto correcto 

¡Atención! Es posible que algunas 

empresas de ventas en línea o por 

correo le envíen un artículo de 

otra marca. Las lentes de contacto 

tal vez sean parecidas, pero los 

materiales y las formas cambian 

de una marca a otra. Controle que 

haya recibido lo que solicitó. La 

empresa debe brindar la siguiente 

información:

• Marca

• Nombre de la lente

• Potencia

o Esfera

o Cilindro, si lo tuviera

o Eje, si lo tuviera

• Diámetro

• Curva base

• Curvas periféricas, si las tuviera

Para obtener más información:

Centro sobre Dispositivos Médicos y Salud Radiológica (CDRH)

de la Administración de Alimentos y Medicamentos (FDA)

Teléfono: 1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332)

http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/contactlenses/buying.html

Consulte siempre a su médico.

Cómo comprar lentes de 

contacto en Internet, por 

teléfono o por correo
EXHIBIT 32.2
   (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is
attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
  /s/ David F. HoffmeisterDavid F. HoffmeisterChief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Life Technologies and will be retained by Life Technologies and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1915.164 Ship's propulsion machinery. ( a ) Before work is performed on the main engine, reduction gear, or connecting accessories, the employer shall ensure that the following steps are taken: ( 1 ) The jacking gear shall be engaged to prevent the main engine from turning over. A sign shall be posted at the throttle indicating that the jacking gear is engaged. This sign shall not be removed until the jacking gear can be safely disengaged.
( 2 ) If the jacking gear is steam driven, the employer shall ensure that the stop valves to the jacking gear are secured, and then locked or tagged, in accordance with § 1915.89.
( 3 ) If the jacking gear is electrically driven, the circuit controlling the jacking gear shall be de-energized by tripping the circuit breaker, opening the switch, or removing the fuse, whichever is appropriate, and then locked or tagged in accordance with § 1915.89.
( b ) Before the jacking engine is operated, the following precautions shall be taken: ( 1 ) A check shall be made to ensure that all employees, equipment, and tools are clear of the engine, reduction gear, and its connecting accessories.
( 2 ) A check shall be made to ensure that all employees, equipment and tools are free of the propeller.
( c ) Before work is started on or in the immediate vicinity of the propeller, a warning sign calling attention to the fact that employees are working in that area shall be hung in a conspicuous location in the engine room. This sign shall not be removed until it is determined that the work is completed and all employees are free of the propeller.
( d ) Before the main engine is turned over (e.g., when warming up before departure or testing after an overhaul) a check shall be made to ensure that all employees, equipment, and tools are free of the propeller.
[47 FR 16986, Apr. 20, 1982, as amended at 76 FR 24711, May 2, 2011]
# EUR-Lex - 31999R2646 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999R2646

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2646/1999 of 15 December 1999 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1059/83 on storage contracts for table wine, grape must, concentrated grape must and rectified concentrated grape must **

*
Official Journal L 324 , 16/12/1999 P. 0010 - 0010 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2646/1999

of 15 December 1999

amending Regulation (EEC) No 1059/83 on storage contracts for table wine, grape must, concentrated grape must and rectified concentrated grape must

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 of 16 March 1987 on the common organisation of the market in wine(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1677/1999(2), and in particular Article 32(5) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1059/83 of 29 April 1983 on storage contracts for table wine, grape must, concentrated grape must and rectified concentrated grape must(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1262/96(4), fixes the aid levels. The aid levels are intended to compensate for the financial and technical costs involved in the storage of wine and for the cost of the requisite certificates of analysis. The downward movement in interest rates in the most recent period justifies a revision of the elements used to calculate the levels of storage aid. On the other hand, the abolition of distillation under the price support guarantee measures has raised the technical storage costs, given that the wines are now placed on the market after storage and must therefore be of good quality and have been carefully looked after during storage. The aid levels must accordingly be adjusted, taking account of the changes in these calculation elements;

(2) the management Committee for Wine has not delivered an opinion within the time limt set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EEC) No 1059/83 is hereby amended as follows:

1. in Article 12(a):

- ECU 0,01715 is replaced by EUR 0,01544,

- ECU 0,02524 is replaced by EUR 0,02272;

2. in Article 12(c):

- ECU 0,02041 is replaced by EUR 0,01837,

- ECU 0,03019 is replaced by EUR 0,02717;

3. in Article 12(d):

- ECU 0,06835 is replaced by EUR 0,06152,

- ECU 0,07547 is replaced by EUR 0,06792;

4. in Article 12(e), ECU 0,06738 is replaced by EUR 0,06152.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 December 1999.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 84, 27.3.1987, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 199, 30.7.1999, p. 8.

(3) OJ L 116, 30.4.1983, p. 77.

(4) OJ L 163, 2.7.1996, p. 18.
S. 4902 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 351 South West Temple 

in Salt Lake City, Utah, as the ‘‘Orrin G. Hatch United States Courthouse’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ORRIN G. HATCH UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The United States courthouse located at 

351 South West Temple in Salt Lake City, Utah, shall be known 

and designated as the ‘‘Orrin G. Hatch United States Courthouse’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 

to be a reference to the ‘‘Orrin G. Hatch United States Courthouse’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### § 18.409 Payment of medical and similar expenses.

Evidence of furnishing or offering or promising to pay medical, hospital, or similar expenses occasioned by an injury is not admissible to prove liability for the injury.
# L_2015015EN.01010601.xml

| 22.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 15/106 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 15/106

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1263/96 of 1 July 1996 supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 on the registration of geographical indications and designations of origin under the procedure laid down in Article 17 of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities L 163 of 2 July 1996
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities L 163 of 2 July 1996

On page 21, Annex, point A ‘Products intended for human consumption listed in Annex II to the Treaty’, Oils and fats, AUSTRIA:

for:

‘Steierisches Kürbiskernöl (PGI)’,

read:

‘Steirisches Kürbiskernöl (PGI)’.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

I, Mark F. Travis, the Chief Executive Officer of Intrepid Capital Corporation
(the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

         1.       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
                  quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 12, 2003

                                     By: /s/ Mark F. Travis
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Mark F. Travis, Chief Executive Officer
§ 1902.36 General provisions. ( a ) In making his evaluation of the actual operations of a State's plan for the purposes of an 18(e) determination, the Assistant Secretary shall consider all relevant data which will aid him in making an effective determination. In his evaluation he shall consider whether the requirements of section 18(c) of the Act and the criteria for State plans outlined in subpart B of this part as well as those in § 1902.37 are being applied in actual operations for a reasonable period of time in a manner which warrants the termination of concurrent Federal enforcement authority and standards in issues covered under the plan.
( b ) The Assistant Secretary's evaluation for an 18(e) determination will be addressed to consideration of whether the criteria and indices in § 1902.37(a) are being applied by the State in such a manner as to render its program in operation at least as effective as operations under the Federal program. In considering the question of such application, the Assistant Secretary shall also consider the factors provided under § 1902.37(b). The Assistant Secretary's evaluation may include such other information on the application of the criteria and indices in § 1902.37 such as information developed from comments received from the public and the results of any hearings which may have been held under § 1902.40 concerning the proposed 18(e) determination.
Swanson, Brian (OST) ^£-o9r'Zooo-o-^^3f 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Thursday, December 29, 2011 1:06 PM 

Swanson, Brian (OST) 

FW: 

-

' •' ? • ' r 30 

From: Cheyne Naeole(a)nps.aov [mailto:Clieyne Naeole(g)nps.aov1 

Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 1:05 PM 

To: Devany, Dennis (OST) . , 

Subject: 

I am in support of makani kai because pacific wings are too expensive $500 for a 

round trip for a 5 minute plane ride is too expensive i can't afford that kine of 

purchase they are to ridiculous.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LI ZHU,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-72289

Agency No. A095-450-164

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 17, 2012** 

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Li Zhu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration

judge’s (“IJ”) order denying her motion to reopen proceedings conducted in

absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

FILED

JUL 24 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-72289

discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894

(9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Zhu’s motion to reopen as

untimely because the motion was filed more than five years after the final order of

removal, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(i) (an alien seeking to reopen and rescind

an in absentia removal order based on exceptional circumstances must file the

motion within 180 days), and Zhu failed to establish the due diligence required for

equitable tolling of the filing deadline, see Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at 897.

Zhu failed to raise, and therefore waived, any challenge to the BIA’s denial

of her motion to remand her case to the IJ for consideration of new evidence. See

Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011) (a petitioner waives an

issue by failing to raise it in the opening brief).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### Allyn *vs.*The Commissioners of Highways of the town of Schodack.

NEW-YORK,

May, 1838.

On a common law certiorari, the court will not review the facts upon which is founded the decision of the judges of the common pleas, upon an appeal to them from an order of commissioners of highways in the laying out of a road.

Whether upon such a writ, this court have power to inquire beyond the question of jurisdiction, *quere.*

This was a *certiorari*directed to three judges of the court of common pleas of the county of Rensselaer, to bring up proceedings had before them *on an appeal*from an order of the commissioners of highways of the town of Schodack declaring a certain road to have become a *public highway*by *use,*laying out the same accordingly, and directing it to be recorded ; which order’ was affirmed by the judges.

*J. Kaon,*for the plaintiff in error.

*G. Palmer*<J- *D. Buel, jun.*for the defendants in error.

*By the Court,*

Bronson, 3.

If we can upon this common law writ of certiorari go beyond the question *oí jurisdiction*in the judges and commissioners, and review questions of *law,*it is certain that we cannot review questions of *fact.*

*343Whether this highway had been used for more than 20 years-whether as a public or a private road-and whether the road was required for the accommodation of the public, are all mere questions of fact, which have been passed upon by the judges and commissioners; and if they have erred~ the

We must be governed by the return as amended, and not by the other papers which have been submitted : and looking at the case on the facts stated by the judges, there is no ground upon which we can interfere. error cannot be reached by this proceeding. - - -

Proceedings affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, David F. Hoffmeister, Chief Financial Officer of Invitrogen Corporation (the
Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                      |  |  |  |                         
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: August 8, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ David F. Hoffmeister
|                      |  |  |  | David F. Hoffmeister    
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Invitrogen and will be retained by Invitrogen and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  23 LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended
June  30,  2007,  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the  undersigned,
Robert  P.  Johnson, President of AEI Fund Management XXI,  Inc.,
the  Managing Member of the Company, and Patrick W. Keene,  Chief
Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc., each certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              August 6, 2007



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              August 6, 2007
# EUR-Lex - 31995Y0622(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995Y0622(01)

**Commission communication to the Member States **

*
Official Journal C 156 , 22/06/1995 P. 0005 - 0005 *

Commission communication to the Member States (95/C 156/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Supplementing the Commission's letter No SG(91) D/4577 of 4 March 1991 concerning the procedures for the notification of aid plans and procedures applicable when aid is provided in breach of the rules of Article 93 (3) of the EC Treaty.

'In 1991 the Commission sent the Member States the letter referred to above, in which it reiterated its concern at the number of cases in which aid was being granted in breach of Article 93, that is to say without the Commission's prior authorization.

Citing the findings in recent decisions of the Court of Justice (1), the Commission said then that where aid had been granted unlawfully it would if necessary adopt a provisional decision requiring the Member State to suspend the aid forthwith.

In the judgments cited, the Court did not accept that the Commission had power to find an aid measure incompatible with the common market on the sole ground that it had been granted unlawfully; but it did hold that the Commission could take "measures . . . to counteract any infringement of Article 93 (3) of the Treaty".

The Commission considers that in some cases an order requiring the suspension of aid which has been unlawfully granted will not go far enough: such an order will not always counteract the infringements of the procedural rules which may have been committed, particularly where all or part of the aid has already been paid out.

On the basis of the same judgments, therefore, the Commission would now inform you that in appropriate cases it may - after giving the Member State concerned the opportunity to comment and to consider alternatively the granting of rescue aid, as defined by the Community guidelines - adopt a provisional decision ordering the Member State to recover any moneys which have been disbursed in infringement of the procedural requirements. The aid would then have to be recovered in accordance with the requirements of domestic law; the sum repayable would carry interest running from the time the aid was paid out. The rate of interest to be applied would be the commercial rate referred to in the Commission's letter of 22 February 1995, i.e. the same as that applied in the recovery of aid granted unlawfully and found to be incompatible with the common market.

As was the case with the provisional decisions contemplated in the Commission's letter of 1991, if the Member State fails to comply with an order of this kind the Commission may refer the matter to the Court of Justice direct, by way of an application for interim measures analogous to the applications provided for in the second subparagraph of Article 93 (2).

Here too it is the Commission's intention to make use of its powers whenever required to safeguard the effectiveness of Article 93 of the EC Treaty`.

(1) Case C-301/87 Boussac [1990] ECR I, p. 307 and Case C-142/87 Tubemeuse [1990] ECR I, p. 959.