alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BANK of CLEVELAND v RICH

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9581.

Decided January 21, 1929

Dunlap, Stephens & Stephens, Cleveland, for Bank. •

Lawrence M. Rich, Esq., Cleveland, for Rich.

VICKERY, J.

That the Municipal Court is not a general court of equity, we must concede, but is the question that is involved in this case, one in equity? The Cleveland Liberty Bank was going into liquidation. It had funds sufficient to pay forty percent upon the common stock of this corporation. Certain of the stock was owned by Rich which had been transferred to him by assignment, but had not been transferred to Rich upon the books of the Bank, but there is no question in this lawsuit but what Rich owned the certificates of stock, and he was asking, upon these certificates of stock, to have his proportion of the money that had been collected for disbursement among, holders of certificates of stock of the Cleveland Liberty Bank, paid to him.. That was refused. Then it simply became an action for money only, and even though his name did not stand upon the books of the Cleveland Liberty Bank as a stockholder, it became a question of proof - on the trial, and if he was the owner of these shares of stock and they had not been put up. as collateral security, and the proof shows that they had not, *452for they were in his possession, he was entitled to recover upon them.

If the Cleveland Liberty Bank was a going concern and Rich wanted to have the stock transferred so as to be in his name in order to draw dividends, he might have been compelled to go into a court of equity in order to have his name entered upon the books, but that is not the situation here..

Not seeing any error in this record that would warrant a disturbance of the judgment, it will be affirmed.

Sullivan, PJ and Levine, J, concur.
EXHIBIT 23.2

ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-100583, 333-89985, 333-47074, and
333-34020) on Form S-3 and (333-87714, 333-83287, 333-66995, 333-56308, 333-35306, and
333-100582) on Form S-8 of 24/7 Real Media, Inc. of our report dated March 29, 2002, except for footnotes 3 and 4(b), which are as of October 15,
2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of 24/7 Real Media, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows, for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2001, which report appears in the December 31, 2002
Annual Report on Form 10-K of 24/7 Real Media, Inc. dated March 31, 2003.

Our
report dated March 29, 2002, except for footnotes 3 and 4(b), which are as of October 15, 2002, in the Current Report on Form 8-K/A of 24/7 Real Media, Inc.
dated December 19, 2002, contains two explanatory paragraphs. The first explanatory paragraph states that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations since inception and has a
working capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from
the outcome of that uncertainty. The second explanatory paragraph states that the Company revised the consolidated financial statements and footnotes to reflect the sale of its IMAKE subsidiary as a
discontinued operation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.

| |  | /s/ KPMG LLP
| |  | ------------

New
York, New York
March 31, 2003

---

QuickLinks
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00355-CV

In the ESTATE OF MARY JANE HARGROVE, Deceased

From the County Court at Law, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6430

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s “Order Probating Will 

And Authorizing Letters Testamentary” and “Order On Jim Bob Hargrove’s Counter-Application 

For Probate Of Codicil” are AFFIRMED. All costs of appeal are assessed against appellant Jim 

Bob Hargrove.

SIGNED March 6, 2019.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
# EUR-Lex - 31998R2797 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998R2797

**Council Regulation (EC) No 2797/98 of 17 December 1998 replacing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1255/96 temporarily suspending the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on certain industrial and agricultural products **

*
Official Journal L 352 , 29/12/1998 P. 0001 - 0058 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 2797/98 of 17 December 1998 replacing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1255/96 temporarily suspending the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on certain industrial and agricultural products

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 28 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas it is in the Community's interest to suspend partially or totally the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties for a number of new products not listed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1255/96 (1);

Whereas a number of products which are referred to in the said Regulation should be withdrawn from the list in the Annex because it is no longer in the Community's interest to maintain suspension of autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties, or because they are exempt from duty under GATT or because the description needs to be altered in the light of technical developments;

Whereas, for the sake of clarity, products whose description needs to be altered should be regarded as new products;

Whereas for ease of comprehension, in view of the large number of amendments coming into force on 1 January 1999, the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1255/96 should be replaced by a completely new version,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1255/96 shall be replaced by the Annex to this Regulation. The autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on these products shall be suspended at the rate indicated for each product.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be applicable from 1 January 1999.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 December 1998.

For the Council

The President

W. MOLTERER

(1) OJ L 158, 29.6.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1359/98 (OJ L 186, 30.6.1998, p. 1).

ANNEX

>TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 70539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28534]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, December 6, 2013.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance, Enforcement Matters, and 
Examinations. In the event that the times, dates or locations of this 
or any future meetings change, an announcement of the change, along 
with the new time, date and location of the meeting will be posted on 
the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melissa D. Jurgens, 202-418-5516.

Natise Stowe,
 Executive Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2013-28534 Filed 11-22-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of IQ POWER TECHNOLOGY INC.  Corporation
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date here of (the  "Report"),  I,
Peter E. Braun, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exhange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in this Report fairly presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.




                                            /s/ Peter E. Braun
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Peter E. Braun
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            August 14, 2002
Front Range Executive Flight Training

37451 Beechcraft Way, #2

Watkins, CO 80237

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Ave, SW

Washington, DC 20591

August 21, 2013

ATTENTION: Document Management System

SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR RENEWAL OF FAA EXEMPTION 10004, 

REGULATORY DOCUMENT NO. FAA-2009-0945, ALLOWING SINGLE PILOT 

OPERATION OF CESSNA CITATION AIRCRAFT.

To Whom It May Concern:

We currently hold an FAA approved exemption, number 10004, Regulatory Document number 

FAA-2009-0945, allowing Single Pilot Operation of certain Cessna Citation Aircraft models. 

We are submitting this letter as written request to renew our exemption for another two years. 

"The terms and conditions of the original petition remain the same." 

The previous address on file is:

Front Range Executive Flight Training

37451 Beechcraft Way, #2

Watkins, CO 80137

Please feel free to contact me at the address described above or by:

Phone: 303-520-6988

Email: wheiss@msn.com

Respectfully,

William Heiss

Administrator – Front Range Executive Flight Training
###### Editorial Note on Subpart Z of Part 1910

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1910 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

#### § 1910.1007 3,′-Dichlorobenzidine (and its salts).

See § 1910.1003, *13 carcinogens.*

[61 FR 9245, Mar. 7, 1996]
§ 1915.92 Retention of DOT markings, placards, and labels. ( a ) Any employer who receives a package of hazardous material that is required to be marked, labeled, or placarded in accordance with the U.S. Department of Transportation Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR parts 171 through 180) shall retain those markings, labels, and placards on the package until the packaging is sufficiently cleaned of residue and purged of vapors to remove any potential hazards.
( b ) Any employer who receives a freight container, rail freight car, motor vehicle, or transport vehicle that is required to be marked or placarded in accordance with the U.S. Department of Transportation Hazardous Materials Regulations shall retain those markings and placards on the freight container, rail freight car, motor vehicle, or transport vehicle until the hazardous materials are sufficiently removed to prevent any potential hazards.
( c ) The employer shall maintain markings, placards, and labels in a manner that ensures that they are readily visible.
( d ) For non-bulk packages that will not be reshipped, the requirements of this section are met if a label or other acceptable marking is affixed in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1200, Hazard Communication.
( e ) For the purposes of this section, the term “hazardous material” and any other terms not defined in this section have the same definition as specified in the U.S. Department of Transportation Hazardous Materials Regulations.
#### § 1902.30 Purpose and scope.

This subpart contains procedures and criteria under which the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health (hereinafter referred to as the Assistant Secretary) under a delegation of authority from the Secretary of Labor (Secretary's Order 12-71, 36 FR 8754) will make his determination on whether to grant final approval to State plans in accordance with the provisions of section 18(e) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 667) (hereinafter referred to as the Act).
Exhibit
31.2
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection
with the Quarterly Report of UC HUB Group, Inc., Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry D. Wilcox,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.
  /s/ Larry D.
      Wilcox
              
              Larry
      D. Wilcox
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer & Principal Financial Officer)
              March
      21, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           8,560
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,999
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (10,389)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,931
<PP&E>                                         112,170
<DEPRECIATION>                                (137,370)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,278
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           111
<OTHER-SE>                                     (84,361)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   175,652
<SALES>                                         36,401
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,401
<CGS>                                           39,142
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (99)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,702
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,344)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9,344)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9,344)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.84)


</TABLE>
#### § 1910.105 Nitrous oxide.

The piped systems for the in-plant transfer and distribution of nitrous oxide shall be designed, installed, maintained, and operated in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet G-8.1-1964, which is incorporated by reference as specified in § 1910.6.

[39 FR 23502, June 27, 1974, as amended at 61 FR 9237, Mar. 7, 1996]
§ 1910.244 Other portable tools and equipment. ( a ) *Jacks* — ( 1 ) *Loading and marking.* ( i ) The operator shall make sure that the jack used has a rating sufficient to lift and sustain the load.
( ii ) The rated load shall be legibly and permanently marked in a prominent location on the jack by casting, stamping, or other suitable means.
( 2 ) *Operation and maintenance.* ( i ) In the absence of a firm foundation, the base of the jack shall be blocked. If there is a possibility of slippage of the cap, a block shall be placed in between the cap and the load.
( ii ) The operator shall watch the stop indicator, which shall be kept clean, in order to determine the limit of travel. The indicated limit shall not be overrun.
( iii ) After the load has been raised, it shall be cribbed, blocked, or otherwise secured at once.
( iv ) Hydraulic jacks exposed to freezing temperatures shall be supplied with an adequate antifreeze liquid.
( v ) All jacks shall be properly lubricated at regular intervals.
( vi ) Each jack shall be thoroughly inspected at times which depend upon the service conditions. Inspections shall be not less frequent than the following: ( a ) For constant or intermittent use at one locality, once every 6 months,
( b ) For jacks sent out of shop for special work, when sent out and when returned,
( c ) For a jack subjected to abnormal load or shock, immediately before and immediately thereafter.
( vii ) Repair or replacement parts shall be examined for possible defects.
( viii ) Jacks which are out of order shall be tagged accordingly, and shall not be used until repairs are made.
( b ) *Abrasive blast cleaning nozzles.* The blast cleaning nozzles shall be equipped with an operating valve which must be held open manually. A support shall be provided on which the nozzle may be mounted when it is not in use.
[39 FR 23502, June 27, 1974, as amended at 49 FR 5323, Feb. 10, 1984]
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Centracan Incorporated, a Florida corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Jerome Goubeaux, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/ Jerome GoubeauxJerome GoubeauxChief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2010
#### § 101.26 Initiation of rescission of authority cases.

The investigation of the question as to whether the authority of a labor organization to make an agreement requiring membership in a labor organization as a condition of employment is to be rescinded is initiated by the filing of a petition by an employee or group of employees on behalf of 30 percent or more of the employees in a bargaining unit covered by an agreement between their employer and a labor organization requiring membership in such labor organization. The petition must be in writing and signed, and either must be notarized or must contain a declaration by the person signing it, under the penalties of the Criminal Code, that its contents are true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief. It is filed with the regional director for the Region in which the alleged appropriate bargaining unit exists or, if the bargaining unit exists in two or more Regions, with the regional director for any of such Regions. The blank form, which is supplied by the Regional Office upon request or is available online, provides, among other things, for a description of the bargaining unit covered by the agreement, the approximate number of employees involved, the names of any other labor organizations which claim to represent the employees, the petitioner's position on the type, date(s), time(s), and location(s) of the election sought, and the name of, and contact information for, the individual who will serve as the petitioner's representative. The petition may be filed by facsimile or electronically. The petitioner must supply with the petition evidence of authorization from the employees.

[79 FR 74476, Dec. 15, 2014]
From: "Higgins, Cortney " <Cortney _Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: Robin Dunkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, James Hirtz/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Bill Schrock/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, John Bradfield/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA,

Kelley Spence/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 07/03/2012 12:02 PM Subject: RE: Pulp and Paper RTR draft final rule

________________________________________ Hi Robin, Can we also get the revised risk assessment and any supporting documents/memos/TSDs, including the response to comments document? Thanks, Cortney
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

181) IV-C-148 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:21:01 AM Sheet 181 of 232 
P.2 

\XJAN 9 '^od 

Robert C. Steiapel, President v^°

 ,v

 y% ^ 

General Motors Corporation ^ ^$* (^ 

14-135 GM Building ^ . :>^A 

3044 West Grand Boulevard .^'r^' 

Detroit, MI 48202 C^' *'•' 

Dear Bob* 

I appreciated your letter of December 13, 1938 concerning 

our recent meeting to discuss the potential control of gasoline 

volatility and vehicle refueling vapors. I believe the meeting 

was productive in identifying our respective points of view. 

My staff looks forward to being provided with GM*s complete 

technical information regarding GM's evaluation of onboard 

vehicle control system designs. I agree that a mutual exchange 

of such information and data between our engineers is ^n 

essential part of the rulemaking process. 

I acknowledge that GM and EPA do not at this point agree on 

the relative cost effectiveness of Stage II controls versus 

onboard controls. As you know, our estimates of cost 

effectiveness have changed substantially in the past year based 

on new information on vehicle running losses and other 

evaporative emissions. Although most of these new data have 

already been shared with the auto companies and others, it will 

be fully presented as part of our upcosaing supplemental notice 

of proposed rulemaking. This will allow a comprehensive review 

and comment on all aspects of our analysis by the interested 

parties. 

Thank you again for taking the time to arrange for our 

meeting. As always, ay staff is available at any time to meet 

with GM staff on these or other Issues. 

Sincerely, 

tea" ;' 

Leo M. Thomas