alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21

                           PARENTS AND SUBSIDIARIES

The Company and its subsidiaries* as of March 10, 2007 are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              State (Country) of            Percentage of Voting
Name of Company                                  Incorporation                Securities Owned
---------------                             ----------------------         ----------------------
<C>                                                <C>                             <C>
Kellwood Company                                   Delaware                        Parent
American Recreation Products, Inc.                 Delaware                         100%
Kellwood Asia Limited                              Hong Kong                        100%
Smart Shirts Limited                               Hong Kong                        100%
Smart Shirts Manufacturers, Limited                Hong Kong                        100%
Smart Shirts (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.                    China                          100%
Kellwood Global Limited                            Hong Kong                        100%
KWD Holdings, Inc.                                 Delaware                         100%
Halmode Apparel, Inc.                              Delaware                         100%
Kellwood Retail Group, Inc.                        Delaware                         100%
Koret of California, Inc.                          California                       100%
Kellwood Financial Resources, Inc.                 Delaware                         100%
Kellwood Financial Services, Inc.                  Delaware                         100%
Gerber Childrenswear, Inc.                         Delaware                         100%
Briggs New York, Inc.                              Delaware                         100%
Phat Fashions LLC                                  New York                         100%
Vince, Inc.                                        Delaware                         100%

<FN>
* Some of the above subsidiaries also have subsidiaries, which are not listed
because, in the aggregate, they are not considered to be significant.
</TABLE>
§ 1471.970 Nonprocurement transaction. ( a ) *Nonprocurement transaction* means any transaction, regardless of type (except procurement contracts), including, but not limited to the following: ( 1 ) Grants.
( 2 ) Cooperative agreements.
( 3 ) Scholarships.
( 4 ) Fellowships.
( 5 ) Contracts of assistance.
( 6 ) Loans.
( 7 ) Loan guarantees.
( 8 ) Subsidies.
( 9 ) Insurances.
( 10 ) Payments for specified uses.
( 11 ) Donation agreements.
( b ) A nonprocurement transaction at any tier does not require the transfer of Federal funds.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of UC Hub Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry D. Wilcox,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                /s/ Larry D. Wilcox
                                Larry D. Wilcox
                                Principal Executive Officer & Principal
                                Financial Officer
                                June 13, 2007
#### § 102.100 Notice of petition; service of petition.

Upon the filing of a petition, the petitioner must simultaneously serve, in the manner provided by § 102.5(g), a copy of the petition on all parties to the proceeding and on the Director of the Board's Regional Office having jurisdiction over the territorial area in which such agency or court is located. A statement of service must be filed with the petition as provided by § 102.5(h).

[82 FR 11767, Feb. 24, 2017]
#### Yesenia Padilla, Appellant, v White Plains City School District, Respondent.

[698 NYS2d 529]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), entered October 9, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff allegedly sustained injuries when she slipped and fell on water and food while descending a staircase at White Plains High School. The defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it had neither actual nor constructive notice of the condition that caused the plaintiff to fall. In response, the plaintiff conceded that the defendant had no actual notice, but maintained that a triable' issue of fact existed as to whether the defendant had constructive notice, contending that the “dirty” condition of the water led to the inference that it had been present for a sufficient length of time to establish notice.

In order for a plaintiff to establish a prima facie case of negligence in a slip and fall case, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant created the condition that caused the accident, or that the defendant had actual or constructive notice of the condition *(see, Cellini v Waldbaum, Inc.,*262 AD2d 345; *Bykofsky v Waldbaum’s Supermarkets,*210 AD2d 280). To constitute constructive notice, a defect must be visible and apparent and it must exist for a sufficient amount of time prior to the accident to permit the defendant’s employees to discover and remedy it *(see, Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,*67 NY2d 836).

In this case, the defendant established, prima facie, the absence of notice as a matter of law *(see, Bachrach v Waldbaum, Inc.,*261 AD2d 426). The burden then shifted to the plaintiff to come forward with evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see, Cellini v Waldbaum, Inc., supra).*The plaintiff, in opposition, merely speculated and submitted no proof that the substances upon which she allegedly slipped and *443fell were present on the step for a sufficient length of time prior to the accident to permit the defendant’s employees to discover and remedy the hazardous condition *(see, Cuddy v Waldbaum, Inc.,*230 AD2d 703). Bracken, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.
§ 1910.26 Dockboards. The employer must ensure that each dockboard used meets the requirements of this section. The employer must ensure: ( a ) Dockboards are capable of supporting the maximum intended load in accordance with § 1910.22(b);
( b ) ( 1 ) Dockboards put into initial service on or after January 17, 2017 are designed, constructed, and maintained to prevent transfer vehicles from running off the dockboard edge;
( 2 ) *Exception to paragraph (b)(1) of this section.* When the employer demonstrates there is no hazard of transfer vehicles running off the dockboard edge, the employer may use dockboards that do not have run-off protection.
( c ) Portable dockboards are secured by anchoring them in place or using equipment or devices that prevent the dockboard from moving out of a safe position. When the employer demonstrates that securing the dockboard is not feasible, the employer must ensure there is sufficient contact between the dockboard and the surface to prevent the dockboard from moving out of a safe position;
( d ) Measures, such as wheel chocks or sand shoes, are used to prevent the transport vehicle (*e.g.* a truck, semi-trailer, trailer, or rail car) on which a dockboard is placed, from moving while employees are on the dockboard; and
( e ) Portable dockboards are equipped with handholds or other means to permit safe handling of dockboards.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4860 

To exempt payments made from the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Account from sequestration under the Balanced Budget and Emergency 

Deficit Control Act of 1985. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26 (legislative day, OCTOBER 19), 2020 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To exempt payments made from the Railroad Unemployment 

Insurance Account from sequestration under the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 

1985. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Railroad Employee Eq5 uity and Fairness Act’’ or the ‘‘REEF Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4860 IS

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF PAYMENTS FROM THE RAILROAD 

2 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACCOUNT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 256(i)(1) of the Balanced 

4 Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 

5 U.S.C. 906(i)(1)) is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

7 the end; 

8 (2) in subparagraph (C), by inserting ‘‘and’’ at 

9 the end; and 

10 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the fol11 lowing new subparagraph: 

12 ‘‘(D) any payment made from the Railroad Un13 employment Insurance Account (established by sec14 tion 10 of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance 

15 Act) for the purpose of carrying out the Railroad 

16 Unemployment Insurance Act, and funds appro17 priated or transferred to or otherwise deposited in 

18 such Account,’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The treatment of payments 

20 made from the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Ac21 count pursuant to the amendment made by subsection (a) 

22 shall take effect 7 days after the date of enactment of this 

23 Act and shall apply only to obligations incurred on or after 

24 such effective date for such payments. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Buckling testing and analysisof honeycomb sandwich panel arc segments of a full-scale fairing barrel**
 
Parts: One | Two | Three
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.15:2013-217822/PT.1-2
Item Number:0830-D (online)
CGP systemNumber:000923545
 
February 21, 2018
#### § 382.17 May carriers limit the number of passengers with a disability on a flight?

As a carrier, you must not limit the number of passengers with a disability who travel on a flight. (See also § 382.27(c)(6) of this part.)

[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2004-19482, 73 FR 27665, May 13, 2008, as amended at 74 FR 11471, Mar. 18, 2009]
#### § 1625.21 Apprenticeship programs.

All apprenticeship programs, including those apprenticeship programs created or maintained by joint labor-management organizations, are subject to the prohibitions of sec. 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 623. Age limitations in apprenticeship programs are valid only if excepted under sec. 4(f)(1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 623(f)(1), or exempted by the Commission under sec. 9 of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 628, in accordance with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR 1625.30.

[80 FR 60540, Oct. 7, 2015]
§ 1650.107 Voluntary repayment agreements. ( a ) In response to a Notice of Debt, an employee may propose a written repayment schedule in lieu of the proposed salary offset. Any proposal under this subsection must be received by the office of the official designated in the notice within 15 calendar days after receipt of the Notice of Debt.
( b ) It is within the Commission's discretion to accept or reject a voluntary repayment proposal. The Commission shall send the employee a written decision.
( c ) If the Commission decides that the proposed repayment schedule is unacceptable, and that the written proposed repayment schedule was timely received, the employee shall have a further 15 days from the date he or she received the decision on the proposed repayment schedule in which to file a request for a hearing.
( d ) If the Commission decides that the proposed repayment schedule is acceptable, the agreement shall be put in writing and signed by both the employee and the Commission.
§ 1695.8 Public access to current guidance documents. ( a ) All current guidance documents shall be published with a unique identifier including, at a minimum, the document's title, date of issuance or revision, and its Z-RIN (if applicable).
( b ) All current guidance documents shall made available through a single “guidance portal” on the Commission website, together with a single, searchable, indexed database available to the public;
( c ) The guidance portal shall include a statement that guidance documents lack the force and effect of law, except as authorized by law or as incorporated into a contract;
( d ) The Commission shall maintain and advertise on its website a means for the public to comment electronically on any guidance documents that are subject to the notice and comment procedures described in § 1695.6 and to submit requests electronically for issuance, reconsideration, modification, or rescission of guidance documents in accordance with § 1695.7; and
( e ) Designate an office to receive and address complaints from the public that the Commission is not following the relevant requirements for issuing guidance or is improperly treating a guidance document as a binding requirement.
# EUR-Lex - 31999R0684 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999R0684

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 684/1999 of 29 March 1999 amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 laying down detailed rules for implementing the system of additional import duties and fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin, and repealing Regulation No 163/67/EEC **

*
Official Journal L 086 , 30/03/1999 P. 0006 - 0006 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 684/1999 of 29 March 1999 amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 laying down detailed rules for implementing the system of additional import duties and fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin, and repealing Regulation No 163/67/EEC

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in eggs (1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1516/96 (2), and in particular Articles 5(4) and 15 thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in poultrymeat (3), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2916/95 (4), and in particular Articles 5(4) and 15 thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2783/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common system of trade for ovalbumin and lactalbumin (5), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2916/95, and in particular Articles 3(4) and 10 thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 (6) was recently amended by Regulation (EC) No 493/1999 (7) in accordance with the decision taken in the framework of the World Trade Organisation to make it compulsory for the additional duty to be established on the basis of the cif import price; whereas Articles 4(2) and 6 of that Regulation must also be amended in accordance with that decision;

Whereas it is necessary to apply this amendment as soon as possible;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Eggs and Poultrymeat,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 is hereby amended as follows:

1. Article 4(2) is deleted;

2. in Article 6, 'laid down in Annex I` is replaced by 'referred to in Article 1`.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply with effect from 25 March 1999.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 March 1999.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 282, 1. 11. 1975, p. 49.

(2) OJ L 189, 30. 7. 1996, p. 99.

(3) OJ L 282, 1. 11. 1975, p. 77.

(4) OJ L 305, 19. 12. 1995, p. 49.

(5) OJ L 282, 1. 11. 1975, p. 104.

(6) OJ L 145, 29. 6. 1995, p. 47.

(7) OJ L 59, 6. 3. 1999, p. 15.
1 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov The Parker Ranch installation in Hawaii 

# BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM

Distribution Transformers

Energy Conservation Program LBNL Staff on behalf of

U.S. Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy



## November 21, 20112 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov 

# Contents

**Draft National Impacts Analysis Results, ZDMH/SA1**  **(Wound Core)**

**Exclusion Scenario for Low** 

**- Voltage Dry** 

**- Type Transformers** 

Prepared for the Low

- Voltage Distribution

Transformers Negotiated Rulemaking Working Group

November 21, 20113 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov 

## National Impacts Summary Results for LVDT ZDMH/SA1

(Wound Core) Exclusion Scenario, by Efficiency Level

Summary Results by Efficiency Level for Low

- Voltage Dry

- Type Transformers

Efficiency Level

Base 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Transformer Shipments 2015

- 2044 (Billion KVA) 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.61 0.61 NA

Equipment Cost Savings ($Billions) 19.72

- 2.30

- 2.67

- 3.24

- 3.90

- 6.40

- 15.01 NA

Operating Cost Savings ($ Billions) 26.53 9.40 10.30 10.79 11.89 13.42 15.71 NA

Cumulative Source Savings 2044 (Quads) 1.01 1.11 1.16 1.28 1.44 1.68 NA

Net Present Value at 3% Discount Rate ($Billions) 7.10 7.63 7.55 7.99 7.02 0.70 NA

Net Present Value at 7% Discount Rate ($Billions) 1.81 1.91 1.77 1.78 0.98

- 2.71 NA4 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov 

# Summary Results by EL for Equipment Class 3 National Impacts Summary Results for LVDT ZDMH/SA1

(Wound Core) Exclusion Scenario, by Efficiency Level



# Summary Results by EL for Equipment Class 4 Efficiency Level

Base 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Transformer Shipments 2015

- 2044 (Billion KVA) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 NA NA

Equipment Cost Savings ($Billions) 0.92

- 0.02

- 0.09

- 0.19

- 0.37

- 0.79 NA NA

Operating Cost Savings ($ Billions) 0.84 0.12 0.21 0.27 0.36 0.42 NA NA

Cumulative Source Savings 2044 (Quads) 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.04 NA NA

Net Present Value at 3% Discount Rate ($Billions) 0.10 0.12 0.08

- 0.01

- 0.37 NA NA

Net Present Value at 7% Discount Rate ($Billions) 0.03 0.02

- 0.01

- 0.08

- 0.27 NA NA

Efficiency Level

Base 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Transformer Shipments 2015

- 2044 (Billion KVA) 0.60 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 NA

Equipment Cost Savings ($Billions) 18.81

- 2.28

- 2.59

- 3.05

- 3.53

- 5.62

- 14.22 NA

Operating Cost Savings ($ Billions) 25.69 9.28 10.09 10.52 11.53 13.01 15.29 NA

Cumulative Source Savings 2044 (Quads) 1.00 1.09 1.13 1.24 1.40 1.64 NA

Net Present Value at 3% Discount Rate ($Billions) 7.00 7.51 7.47 8.00 7.39 1.07 NA

Net Present Value at 7% Discount Rate ($Billions) 1.78 1.88 1.78 1.85 1.25

- 2.44 NA
1 

BEFORE 

THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 

WASHINGTON, D.C 

------------------------------------ 

Motion of: )

 ) 

Serge Barder, (on behalf and for ) 

The interest of the American Public ) 

At large. ) DOT-OST-2013-0200-0001

 ) 

To deny an application for foreign ) 

Air carrier, under 49 USC 41301 ) 

and/or 40109. ) 

------------------------------------ 

Motion to deny an application for foreign air carrier, under 49 USC 

41301 and/or 40109 filed by Compagnie Aerienne Interregionale Express 

(CAIRE)dba Air Guyane / Air Antilles Express. 

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: 

Serge Barder 

211 cape Florida Drive 

Key Biscayne, FL, 33149 

P : (305) 361 7357 

F : (305) 361 7358 

Serge.barder@gmail.com

Submitted on this 3rd day of February 2014. 
2 

BEFORE 

THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 

WASHINGTON, D.C 

------------------------------------ 

Motion of: )

 ) 

Serge Barder, (on behalf and for ) 

the interest of the American Public ) 

At large. (The Petitioner) ) DOT-OST-2013-0200-0001

 ) 

To deny an application for foreign ) 

Air carrier, under 49 USC 41301 ) 

and/or 40109. ) 

--------------------------------------- 

I, Serge Barder hereby confirm that a new brief concerning my request 

to deny an application for foreign AIR CARRIER has been filed today 

February 3, 2014, replacing the brief filed on January 31, 2014. 

I am requesting that the initial brief filed on 01/31/2014 be removed 

from the docket, and replaced by the brief filed on this day. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. 
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Luis Salva 

atc@prw.net 

Brett Kruger 

Brett.Kruger@dot.gov 

Robert Finamore 

Robert.Finamore@dot.gov 

Ismael Bonilla 

aerostarairport.com 

urskr@state.gov 

Howard Kass 

howard_kass@uswairways.com 

Dan Weiss 

dan.weiss@united.com 

Sascha Vanderbellen 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

Francis Heil@aa.com 

Gary Foss 

gfoss@seaborneairlines.com
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as added by

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pulaski Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pulaski Financial as of and for the period
covered by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                       |  |                                     
|----------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: December 12, 2007 |  | /s/ William A. Donius
|                        |  | Name:                 |  | William A. Donius                   
|                        |  | Title:                |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer