alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 490 

AN ACT 

To designate a mountain ridge in the State of Montana 

as ‘‘B–47 Ridge’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 490 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘B–47 Ridge Designa3 tion Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF B–47 RIDGE, MONTANA. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—The unnamed mountain 

7 ridge located at 45°14′40.89′′ N., 110°43′38.75′′ W. 

8 that runs south and west of Emigrant Peak in the 

9 Absaroka Range in the State of Montana, which is 

10 the approximate site of a crash of a B–47, shall be 

11 known and designated as ‘‘B–47 Ridge’’. 

12 (2) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, 

13 map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of 

14 the United States to the ridge described in para15 graph (1) shall be deemed to be a reference to ‘‘B– 

16 47 Ridge’’. 

17 (b) AUTHORIZATION FOR PLAQUE.— 

18 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Agriculture 

19 may authorize the installation and maintenance of a 

20 plaque on B–47 Ridge that— 

21 (A) memorializes the 1962 crash of the B– 

22 47 aircraft at the site; and 

23 (B) may include the names of the victims 

24 of the crash. 

25 (2) AUTHORIZED TERMS AND CONDITIONS.— 

26 The Secretary of Agriculture may include any terms 
3 

†S 490 ES

1 and conditions in the authorization for a plaque 

2 under paragraph (1) that the Secretary of Agri3 culture determines to be necessary. 

4 (3) FUNDING.—No Federal funds may be used 

5 to design, procure, install, or maintain the plaque 

6 authorized under paragraph (1). 

Passed the Senate February 12, 2020. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 490 

AN ACT 

To designate a mountain ridge in the State of 

Montana as ‘‘B–47 Ridge’’.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1382
In Re: REGINALD L. FRAZIER, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-02-29) Submitted: April 7, 2003 Decided: April 28, 2003 Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald L. Frazier, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Reginald Frazier, disbarred as an attorney in 1989, has recently been convicted in North Carolina state court of several counts stemming from his unauthorized practice of law. He petitions this court for a writ of mandamus staying his sentence or ordering the state court to set a reasonable bond pending appeal. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). This court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials, seeGurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg County , 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969), and does not have jurisdiction to review state court orders, see District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman , 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983). Thus, the relief sought by Frazier is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny Frazier’s motion for stay or injunction of his sentence and deny his petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments3 are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
§ 18.54 Stipulations about discovery procedure. Unless the judge orders otherwise, the parties may stipulate that: ( a ) A deposition may be taken before any person, at any time or place, on any notice, and in the manner specified—in which event it may be used in the same way as any other deposition; and
( b ) Other procedures governing or limiting discovery be modified— but a stipulation extending the time for any form of discovery must have the judge's approval if it would interfere with the time set for completing discovery, for hearing a motion, or for hearing.
#### STATE OF FLORIDA v BLANCO

Case No. 85-224 AC

Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Appellate Division, Dade County

January 26, 1987

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Jim Smith, Attorney General, and Julie Thornton, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Bonnie Rippingille for appellee.

Before KAYE, MASTOS, ROBINSON, JJ.

*118OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The traffic stop in this case, as testified to by the defendant, was no more coercive than the stop described in *Berkemer v. McCarty,*468 U.S. 420, 104 S. Ct. 3138, 82 L. Ed. 2d 314 (1984). As such the defendant was not in custody during the initial questioning.

Roadside test are non-testimonial and not subject to *Miranda*requirements. *State v. Villanueva,*7 Fla. Supp. 2d 101 (Cir. Ct. Dade 1984); *State v. Arsenault,*336 A. 2d 244, 115 N.H. 109 (1975).

The County Court’s suppression of the pre-arrest statements and roadside tests were an error. The Order Granting Motion to Suppress and Exclude is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
**EXHIBIT 10.38**

Gary Burnison 

2731 Appalachian Court 

WestlakeVillage, CA 91362 

**RE: Notice of Renewal of Employment Agreement**

Dear Gary, 

It is my pleasure to notify you that the Korn/FerryInternational (the “Company”) has elected to renew the Employment Agreement between you and the Company dated October 1, 2003 (the “Agreement”) for an additional one year term as permitted by Section 2 of the Agreement,such additional year to commence on May 1, 2007 and conclude on April 30, 2008. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ Kenneth Whipple 

Kenneth Whipple 

Chair, Compensation Committee 

 

1
exv10w1w12







Exhibit 10.1.12




October 30, 2009




William J. Smutny

Vice President, Sales and Marketing

SeraCare Life Sciences, Inc.

37 Birch Street

Milford, MA 01757




          Re: Modification of Award




Dear Mr. Smutny:



This letter will confirm your agreement with and acknowledgment of the following:



You hereby consent to the modification of the Award Opportunity provided to you under the SeraCare
Life Sciences, Inc. Management Incentive Plan effective as of October 1, 2007 (the “Plan”)
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009 such that the Award Payment shall be payable one-half
in cash and one-half in shares of common stock of SeraCare Life Sciences, Inc. (the
“Company”) on the criteria previously set by the Board of Directors of the Company. The
number of shares of the Company’s common stock that will be granted to you will equal one-half of
the Award Payment divided by the closing price per share of the Company’s common stock on the date
of grant of such shares (the “Share Grant Date”). The resulting share total shall be
rounded down to the nearest whole share and any fractional amount shall be payable in cash. These
shares shall be granted pursuant to the Company’s 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. Notwithstanding any
of the foregoing, the Company may in its discretion pay cash (in lieu of shares) equal to the
actual fair market value of any portion or all of such shares on the Share Grant Date.



For the avoidance of doubt, the Company may withhold from cash amounts otherwise payable to you,
including up to the entire amount of the cash portion of the Award Payment, such amounts as the
Company determines in its discretion may be required to be withheld for tax purposes with respect
to the Award Payment (including both the cash and the stock portions thereof). All capitalized
terms above which are not defined herein are as defined in the Plan.



 









 





Please indicate your agreement to the terms of this letter by countersigning this letter in the
space provided below and returning your original signed letter to the Company.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Very truly yours,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	SeraCare Life Sciences, Inc.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:

Name:
	 	/s/ Susan L.N. Vogt
 

Susan L.N. Vogt
	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	President and Chief Executive Officer	 	 






Accepted and agreed to under seal this 30th day of October, 2009




	 	 	 
	/s/ William J. Smutny
 

William J. Smutny
VI 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 841 

For the relief of Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and Maria Del Refugio Plascencia. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2007 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and Maria Del 

Refugio Plascencia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ALFREDO 

4 PLASCENCIA LOPEZ AND MARIA DEL 

5 REFUGIO PLASCENCIA. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

7 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act, Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and Maria Del Refugio 

9 Plascencia shall each be eligible for the issuance of an im10 migrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien 

11 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•S 841 IS

1 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec2 tion 204 of that Act or for adjustment of status to lawful 

3 permanent resident. 

4 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Alfredo Plascencia 

5 Lopez and Maria Del Refugio Plascencia enter the United 

6 States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 

7 Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and Maria Del Refugio 

8 Plascencia shall be considered to have entered and re9 mained lawfully and shall be eligible for adjustment of sta10 tus under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality 

11 Act as of the date of enactment of this Act. 

12 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

13 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap14 plication for issuance of immigrant visas or the application 

15 for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate fees 

16 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

17 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

18 Upon the granting of immigrant visas or permanent resi19 dence to Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and Maria Del Refugio 

20 Plascencia, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 

21 officer to reduce by 2, during the current or next following 

22 fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that are 

23 made available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth 

24 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

25 Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•S 841 IS

1 that are made available to natives of the country of the 

2 aliens’ birth under section 202(e) of that Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.1104 alpha-Naphthylamine.

Note:

The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1003 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-1910.1003).

[[61 FR 31433](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31433), June 20, 1996]
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.34 Means of egress. ( a ) *General.* In every building or structure exits shall be so arranged and maintained as to provide free and unobstructed egress from all parts of the building or structure at all times when it is occupied. No lock or fastening to prevent free escape from the inside of any building shall be installed except in mental, penal, or corrective institutions where supervisory personnel is continually on duty and effective provisions are made to remove occupants in case of fire or other emergency.
( b ) *Exit marking.* Exits shall be marked by a readily visible sign. Access to exits shall be marked by readily visible signs in all cases where the exit or way to reach it is not immediately visible to the occupants.
( c ) *Maintenance and workmanship.* Means of egress shall be continually maintained free of all obstructions or impediments to full instant use in the case of fire or other emergency.
[58 FR 35083, June 30, 1993]
§ 1919.72 Annual examination of cranes. ( a ) In any year in which no quadrennial unit proof test is required, an examination shall be carried out by an accredited person or his authorized representative. Such examination shall be made not later than the anniversary date of the quadrennial certification and shall conform with the requirements of § 1919.71(d).
1984-stds-specs-geodetic-control-networks.htm

    - Button1:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
financial statements for the six months ended May 31, 2000, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                       	     0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              650
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,300
<OTHER-SE>                                    (10,950)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,207
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,207)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,207)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,207)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### ROGER H. GREENE v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. 43280.

Decided June 7, 1937]

*Mr. George A. King*for the plaintiff. *King & King*were on the brief.

*Mr. Louis R. Mehlinger,*with whom was *Mr. Assistant Attorney General Sam E. Whitaher,*for the defendant.

*551Green, *Judge,*

delivered the opinion of the court:

On June 25, 1932, the plaintiff was appointed secretary and law clerk to the Judge of the District Court of the United States for the Canal Zone and served until February 28, 1934, when his resignation was requested by the newly appointed Judge of this court. When he resigned he requested commutation of such leave as was then due him. *552I-Iis request was. denied by the United States Marshal. He then filed a claim for the commuted value of such leave with the General Accounting Office which was also disallowed. He now brings suit to recover the cash value of the leave which he had accumulated but not used at the time of his resignation.

By section 4 of the Panama Canal Act of August 24, 1912 (37 Stat. 561), the President was authorized to complete, govern, and operate the Panama Canal and govern the Canal Zone, or cause this to be done through other persons. The statute further provided that “the compensation of such persons shall be fixed by the President, or by his authority”, within a limitation not material here. An Executive Order of the President provided for twenty-four days of annual leave for employees, which could be taken annually or left to accumulate to the credit of the employee. The order also provided that when an employee’s service was terminated a cash payment in commutation of leave would be made to him for the number of days of cumulative leave due plus the annual leave due. Regulations carrying into effect this order were in force at the time of plaintiff’s resignation.

As above stated, the claim was denied by the Comptroller General who held that the provision in the Act of August 24, 1912, concerning the fixing of compensation by the President “does not include the authority to grant cash gratuities to former employees”, but we think the provision with reference to accumulated leave is not a gratuity but a part of the employee’s compensation. If any further reasons are needed to sustain plaintiff’s claim they will be found in an exhaustive opinion by the Attorney General dated October 7, 1935, upon the validity of the provision in the Executive Order regarding leave in the Canal Zone, which overrules the decision of the Comptroller General and sustains plaintiff’s right to recover the amount of his accumulated leave at the time he left the Court service.

Judgment will be rendered in favor of plaintiff for the commuted value of his unused leave, which is $619.46.

Whaley, Judge; Williams, *Judge-,*Littleton, *Judge',*and Booth, *Chief Justice,*concur.
#### E. E. Woodson, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. The State of Flor*ida, Defendant in Error.*

Where there was no evidence of a living in an open state of adultery within the limited period charged, the single act of intercourse between the parties anterior to such time is not admissible to convict of a substantive offense committed between such periods.

This case was decided by Division B.

Writ of error to the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*Price*& *Bailey,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Pcvrlc Trammell,*Attorney General, and *Chas. 0. Andrews,*for the State.

Parkhill, J.

— The plaintiff in error was convicted, in the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, upon an information charging that he “on the 10th day of May, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and eleven, in the county and State aforesaid. Being then and there a widower, and one Alich English, being then *107and there a married woman, having a husband living, to-wit: one B. T. English, late of the county of Dade aforesaid, on the 10th day of May, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and eleven, and thence until the 20th day of May, A. D. 1911, with force and arms at and in the county of Dade aforesaid, did live together in an open state of adultery, contrary, etc.”

From the sentence and judgment in said case he sues out writ of error.

The defendant entered a plea of not guilty. Although no attack is made on the information, we deem it well to say, in order that it may not serve as a precedent or form to be followed, while it sufficiently appears from the alie gations that the defendant was á widower and Alice English was a married woman on the *10th day of May,*1911, the information does not allege they continued so to be until the 20th day of May, 1911, which time they are charged as having lived in an open state of adultery. Brevaldo v. State, 21 Fla. 789. We see no reason for placing a period after the word “aforesaid” and then making a new sentence and commencing the same with a capital “B” where the information alleges, “Being then and there a widow,” etc. Passing these matters by, however, we think the evidence insufficient to support the verdict.

The information charges that, between the 10th, and 20th, days of May, 1911, the defendant and Alice English did live together in an open state of adultery. There was no evidence of a living in an open state of adultery within the limited period charged, and the single act of intercourse between the defendant and Mrs. English, testified to by one witness, anterior to such time, is not admissible to convict of a substantive offense committed between such periods.

*108The judgment is reversed.

Taylor and Hocker, J. J., concur;

Whitfield, C. J., and Shackleford and Cockrell, J. J., concur in the opinion.