alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 97 (Thursday, May 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31593-31594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12527]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Letters of Authorization To Take Marine Mammals

AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of issuance of Letters of Authorization to take marine 
mammals incidental to oil and gas industry activities.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 101(a)(5)(A) of the Marine Mammal 
Protection Act of 1972, as amended, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service implementing regulations [50 CFR 18.27(f)(3)], notice is hereby 
given that Letters of Authorization to take polar bears and Pacific 
walrus incidental to oil and gas industry exploration, development, and 
production activities have been issued to the following companies:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Company                   Activity           Date issued
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BP Exploration (Prudhoe Bay       Production........  April 21, 2000.
 Unit).
BP Exploration (Kuparuk Unit)...  Production........  April 21, 2000.
Western Geophysical (Anadarko)..  Exploration.......  April 21, 2000.

[[Page 31594]]

 
BP Exploration (Northstar)......  Development.......  May 3, 2000.
ARCO Alaska, Inc. (Meltwater      Exploration.......  May 3, 2000.
 North).
ARCO Alaska, Inc. (Spark # 1)...  Exploration.......  May 3, 2000.
ARCO Alaska, Inc. (Rendezvous     Exploration.......  May 3, 2000.
 A&B).
ARCO Alaska, Inc. (Lookout A)...  Exploration.......  May 3, 2000.
ARCO Alaska, Inc. (Moose's Tooth  Exploration.......  May 3, 2000.
 A&C).
ARCO Alaska, Inc. (Clover A&B)..  Exploration.......  May 3, 2000.
ARCO Alaska, Inc. (Cairn).......  Exploration.......  May 3, 2000.
Western Geophysical (ARCO)......  Exploration.......  May 3, 2000.
Western Geophysical (BP           Exploration.......  May 3, 2000.
 Exploration).
Kuukpik/Fairweather Geophysical.  Exploration.......  May 3, 2000.
BP Exploration (Point Thomson)..  Exploration.......  May 3, 2000.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John W. Bridges at the U.S. Fish 
and Wildlife Service, Marine Mammals Management Office, 1011 East Tudor 
Road, Anchorage, Alaska 99503, (300) 362-5148 or (907) 786-3810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  
    Letters of Authorization were issued in accordance with U.S. Fish 
and Wildlife Service Federal Rules and Regulations ``Marine Mammals; 
Incidental Take During Specified Activities (65 FR 16828; March 30, 
2000).''

    Dated: May 8, 2000.
Mike Boylan,
Acting Deputy Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 00-12527 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
#### HANK v. ADAMS CO. COMMRS.

Ohio Appeals, 4th Dist., Adams Co.

Decided Nov. 14, 1928.

Lovett, Young & Bush, West Union, for Hank.

W. P. Tucker, Pro's. Atty., West Union, for Co. Commrs.

It is admitted that the defective bridge where the injury occurred is on a‘state highway The Court of Appeals sitting in Allen County has recently held that bridges along and over state highways are a part of such highways, so that our inquiry is limited to the question of liability of the co.unty commissioners for damages growng out' of defects on such highways. THOMAS, J.

Since the enactment of the State Code with reference to highways the courts of th state have held almost uniformly that boards of county commissioners are not liable for defects in highways taken over and maintained by the state. The case of Weiher v. Phillips, 103 O. S. 249, settles the question. In that case the court say:

> “It is universally conceded that the county commissioners can not be held liable in their official capacity for negligent performance of a duty unless such liability is created by statute. The law on the this subject has been repeatedly under discussion in this court and is well settled.”

Construing Section 4208 of the General Code which provides that the “board shall be liable in its official capacity for damages received by reason of its negligence or carelessness in not keeping such road or bridge in proper repair” the court say:

> “Since the enactment of that section a great deal of litigation throughout the different counties of the state has been predicated upon its provisions, and the courts have uniformly recognized the doctrine that those provisions are in derogation of the common law, and that therefore the provisions of the section must be strictly construed and the county commissioners can not be held liable beyond the plain import of its terms.”

Construing Sections 1224, 1230-1, 1230, 7464, 7467, 7209, 7210, 7202, 7204 of the General Code the court say:

> “These sections very clearly place all the control, supervision, maintenance and repair of inter-county and main market roads, otherwise known as state roads, under the exclusive authority and jurisdiction of the state highway commissioners.”

On page 256‘of the opinion the court say:

> “If the board of county commissioners has no duty to perform then there could be no negligence or carelessness charged to the board arising out of the failure of others to perform some duty.

> If there is no duty there can be no negligence. It is not necessary to resort to a definition of the word ‘negligence’ because the word is defined in Section 2408 as the failure to keep any such road in proper repair.

> In this view of the matter there can be only one conclusion and that is that thefe was no duty and therefore no negligence; and therefore no liability *23on the part of the county commissioners.”

It has been said that “For every wrong there is a remedy”, but the .remedy in such cases ,as this one, if there is a wrong, must come from the legislature.

The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas is therefore affirmed.

Middleton, P. J., and Mauck, J., concur.
June 19, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MICHAEL LEE THOM, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00973-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# AGENCY:

 Minerals Management Service (MMS), Interior. 

# ACTION:

 Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

 On December 30, 1999, MMS published a ``Further supplementary proposed rule'' (64 FR 73820) concerning the valuation for royalty purposes of crude oil produced from Federal leases. This notice corrects the email address for submitting comments electronically. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 David S. Guzy, Chief, Rules and Publications Staff; telephone, (303) 2313432; FAX, (303) 2313385; email, David.Guzy@mms.gov; mailing address, Minerals Management Service, Royalty Management Program, Rules and Publications Staff, P.O. Box 25165, MS 3021, Denver, Colorado 802250165. 

## Correction 

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of December 30, 1999, in FR Doc. 9933613, page 73838, column 2, the first sentence is revised to read:                     

You may also comment via the Internet to RMP.comments@mms.gov. 

Dated: January 13, 2000. 

R. Dale Fazio, 

Acting Associate Director for Royalty Management. 

[FR Doc. 00-1257 Filed 1-19-00- 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
§ 1915.502 Fire safety plan. ( a ) *Employer responsibilities.* The employer must develop and implement a written fire safety plan that covers all the actions that employers and employees must take to ensure employee safety in the event of a fire. (See Appendix A to this subpart for a Model Fire Safety Plan.)
( b ) *Plan elements.* The employer must include the following information in the fire safety plan: ( 1 ) Identification of the significant fire hazards;
( 2 ) Procedures for recognizing and reporting unsafe conditions;
( 3 ) Alarm procedures;
( 4 ) Procedures for notifying employees of a fire emergency;
( 5 ) Procedures for notifying fire response organizations of a fire emergency;
( 6 ) Procedures for evacuation;
( 7 ) Procedures to account for all employees after an evacuation; and
( 8 ) Names, job titles, or departments for individuals who can be contacted for further information about the plan.
( c ) *Reviewing the plan with employees.* The employer must review the plan with each employee at the following times: ( 1 ) Within 90 days of December 14, 2004, for employees who are currently working;
( 2 ) Upon initial assignment for new employees; and
( 3 ) When the actions the employee must take under the plan change because of a change in duties or a change in the plan.
( d ) *Additional employer requirements.* The employer also must: ( 1 ) Keep the plan accessible to employees, employee representatives, and OSHA;
( 2 ) Review and update the plan whenever necessary, but at least annually;
( 3 ) Document that affected employees have been informed about the plan as required by paragraph (c) of this section; and
( 4 ) Ensure any outside fire response organization that the employer expects to respond to fires at the employer's worksite has been given a copy of the current plan.
( e ) *Contract employers.* Contract employers in shipyard employment must have a fire safety plan for their employees, and this plan must comply with the host employer's fire safety plan.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1615

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1615 appear at 73 FR 39866, July 11, 2008.

#### §§ 1615.161-1615.169 [Reserved]
§ 1952.12 Alaska. ( a ) The Alaska State plan received initial approval on August 10, 1973.
( b ) The Alaska State plan received final approval on September 28, 1984.
( c ) Under the terms of the 1978 Court Order in *AFL-CIO* v. *Marshall,* compliance staffing levels (benchmarks) necessary for a “fully effective” enforcement program were required to be established for each State operating an approved State plan. Alaska's compliance staffing benchmarks are 4 safety and 5 health compliance officers.
( d ) The plan covers all private-sector employers and employees, with several notable exceptions, as well as State and local government employers and employees, within the State. For current information on these exceptions and for additional details about the plan, please visit *http://www.osha.gov/dcsp/osp/stateprogs/alaska.html .*
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11622]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-265-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

May 4, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 1, 2000, Northern Gas Company (Northern), 
tendered for filing in its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, 
the following tariff sheets proposed to be effective June 1, 2000.

Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 54
Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 61
Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 62
Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 63
Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 64

    Northern states that the revised tariff sheets are being filed in 
accordance with Section 53 of Northern's General Terms and Conditions, 
which requires Northern to adjust its fuel Unaccounted for (UAF) gas 
percentages each June 1.
    Northern further states that copies of the filing have been mailed 
to each of its customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11622 Filed 5-09-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                       4,613,209
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,981,727
<ALLOWANCES>                                   873,240
<INVENTORY>                                  4,997,296
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,777,744
<PP&E>                                         487,223
<DEPRECIATION>                                 176,693
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,663,946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,494,470
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,342,163
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,827,313
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,663,946
<SALES>                                      39,309062
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            39,309,062
<CGS>                                       32,042,499
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,331,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,525,088
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             321,426
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,452,522
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,108,765
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,343,757
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,343,757
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
           pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Citizens First
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report") I, Mary D. Cohron, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:  /s/Mary D. Cohron
        Mary D. Cohron
        Chief Executive Officer


Date:  August  15, 2005

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Citizens First
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report") I, Bill D. Wright, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By:  /s/ Bill D. Wright
         Bill D. Wright
         Chief Financial Officer


Date: August 15, 2005
                                        27
Exhibit 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

              Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended
                                December 31, 2003


The  undersigned  directors of the following  companies (each  respectively  the
"Company")

         Company                                      State of Incorporation

  AEP Generating Company                                     Ohio
  Appalachian Power Company                                Virginia
  AEP Texas Central Company                                 Texas
  AEP Texas North Company                                   Texas
  Columbus Southern Power Company                            Ohio
  Kentucky Power Company                                   Kentucky
  Ohio Power Company                                         Ohio
  Public Service Company of Oklahoma                       Oklahoma
  Southwestern Electric Power Company                      Delaware

do hereby constitute and appoint MICHAEL G. MORRIS, STEPHEN P. SMITH and SUSAN
TOMASKY, and each of them, their attorneys-in-fact and agents, to execute for
them, and in their names, and in any and all of their capacities, the Annual
Report of the Company on Form 10-K, pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, and any and
all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and
other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them,
full power and authority to do and perform every act and thing required or
necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have signed these presents this
28th day of January, 2004.


   /s/ Jeffrey D. Cross                       /s/ Armando A. Pena
-----------------------------              ----------------------
Jeffrey D. Cross                           Armando A. Pena


   /s/ Henry W. Fayne                         /s/ Robert P. Powers
-----------------------------              -----------------------
Henry W. Fayne                             Robert P. Powers


   /s/ Thomas M. Hagan                        /s/ Thomas V. Shockley, III
-----------------------------              ------------------------------
Thomas M. Hagan                            Thomas V. Shockley, III


   /s/ Michael G. Morris                      /s/ Susan Tomasky
-----------------------------              --------------------
Michael G. Morris                          Susan Tomasky
ex10_1.htm


    
      Exhibit
10.1



      WAIVER

       

      November
19, 2009

       

      Reference
is hereby made to that certain Omnibus Agreement, dated as of August 10, 2007
(the “Omnibus
Agreement”), by and among Quicksilver Resources Inc., a Delaware
corporation (“Quicksilver”), Quicksilver
Gas Services LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “MLP”), and Quicksilver Gas
Services GP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and the general partner of
the MLP (the “General
Partner”).  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise
defined shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Omnibus
Agreement.

       

      The
General Partner, intending to be legally bound hereby, waives the obligation of
Quicksilver set forth in Section 2.3(a)(i) of the Omnibus Agreement to provide a
Commencement Notice with respect to, or otherwise offer to sell to a Partnership
Group Member, the Hill County Dry System (one of the “Retained Assets” listed on
Schedule A to the Omnibus Agreement).

       

      
         

         

        
          	 	
                  QUICKSILVER
      GAS SERVICES GP LLC

                
	 	 	 
	 	
                  
                     By:

                  

                	
                  /s/
      Philip Cook

                
	 	 Name:	
                  Philip
      Cook

                
	 	 Title:	
                  Senior Vice
      President – Chief Financial Officer
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4927 

To exclude EIDL advance amounts from the calculation of loan forgiveness 

under the paycheck protection program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2020 

Mr. KING (for himself, Mr. DAINES, and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small 

Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To exclude EIDL advance amounts from the calculation of 

loan forgiveness under the paycheck protection program, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘EIDL Forgiveness 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4927 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF EIDL ADVANCE AMOUNTS FROM 

2 CALCULATION OF LOAN FORGIVENESS 

3 UNDER THE PAYCHECK PROTECTION PRO4 GRAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1106 of the CARES Act 

6 (15 U.S.C. 9005) is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following: 

8 ‘‘(m) EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS.—The 

9 amount of loan forgiveness an eligible recipient may re10 ceive under this section shall be determined without regard 

11 to the amount of any advance the eligible recipient re12 ceived under section 1110(e) of this Act.’’. 

13 (b) PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM.—Section 

14 7(a)(36)(G) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

15 636(a)(36)(G)) is amended— 

16 (1) by striking ‘‘BORROWER REQUIREMENTS’’ 

17 and all that follows through ‘‘eligible recipient apply18 ing’’ and inserting ‘‘BORROWER CERTIFICATION RE19 QUIREMENTS.—An eligible recipient applying’’; 

20 (2) by redesignating subclauses (I) through 

21 (IV) as clauses (i) through (iv), respectively, and ad22 justing the margin accordingly; and 

23 (3) in clause (iv) (as so redesignated), by in24 serting before the period at the end the following: ‘‘, 

25 except for the amount of any advance the eligible reVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:26 Dec 03, 2020 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4927.IS S4927

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4927 IS

1 cipient received under section 1110(e) of the 

2 CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9009(e))’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS