alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2  IDEAEDGE, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Jonathan Shultz, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of IdeaEdge, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) [Paragraph omitted]; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date: May 8, 2009/s/ Jonathan ShultzJonathan ShultzChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
§ 1903.16 Posting of citations. ( a ) Upon receipt of any citation under the Act, the employer shall immediately post such citation, or a copy thereof, unedited, at or near each place an alleged violation referred to in the citation occurred, except as provided below. Where, because of the nature of the employer's operations, it is not practicable to post the citation at or near each place of alleged violation, such citation shall be posted, unedited, in a prominent place where it will be readily observable by all affected employees. For example, where employers are engaged in activities which are physically dispersed (see § 1903.2(b)), the citation may be posted at the location to which employees report each day. Where employees do not primarily work at or report to a single location (see § 1903.2(b)), the citation may be posted at the location from which the employees operate to carry out their activities. The employer shall take steps to ensure that the citation is not altered, defaced, or covered by other material. Notices of de minimis violations need not be posted.
( b ) Each citation, or a copy thereof, shall remain posted until the violation has been abated, or for 3 working days, whichever is later. The filing by the employer of a notice of intention to contest under § 1903.17 shall not affect his posting responsibility under this section unless and until the Review Commission issues a final order vacating the citation.
( c ) An employer to whom a citation has been issued may post a notice in the same location where such citation is posted indicating that the citation is being contested before the Review Commission, and such notice may explain the reasons for such contest. The employer may also indicate that specified steps have been taken to abate the violation.
( d ) Any employer failing to comply with the provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section shall be subject to citation and penalty in accordance with § 1903.15(d).
[36 FR 17850, Sept. 4, 1971, as amended at 81 FR 43453, July 1, 2016]
EXHIBIT 32. - Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Australian-Canadian Oil
Royalties Ltd. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Andre Sakhai, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mahnaz
Nourmand, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.


Dated: April 14, 2010             /S/ ANDRE SAKHAI
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Andre Sakhai, President &
                                  Chief Executive Officer



Dated: April 14, 2010             /S/ MAHNAZ NOURMAND
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Mahnaz Nourmand, Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-1521MN

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, *

* v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District Jose Isabel Mansanares, also known as * of Minnesota. Jose Isabel Mansanares Maldanado, * also known as Macrino Gutierrez * [UNPUBLISHED] Mansanares, also known as Jose Isabel * Mansares, * * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: June 9, 1998

Filed: June 15, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, BRIGHT, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Jose Isabel Mansanares appeals his conviction and sentence for possession o f coc aine with intent to distribute. Mansanares challenges the seizure of drug-relate d evidence that wa s discovered when his apartment was searched under an anticipatory wa rrant. Mansanares also contends the district court improperly calculated the dru g quantity attributable to Mansanares f or sentencing purposes. After a careful review of the record and the parties' briefs, we reject Mansanares's arguments and conclude that-2-

an opinion by this court will have no precedential value. We thus affirm Mansanares's conviction and sentence without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Eleanor J. Bartlett, Resp’t, *v.*The Village of Tarrytown, App’lt.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,*

*Filed May, 1889.)*

1. Municipal cobpobations—Change in gbade op stbeet—Laws 1883, CHAP. 113.

An owner of land on a street in an incorporated village may have a commission appointed to assess damages to his land from a change in the grade made after an extension of the street, though such extension was-made under a deed from him, which recites that it is for a public road “ and for no other uses or purposes."

3. Same—What no answeb to application.

It is no answer to the application for a commission that the street, before the change, was a public street, and that the village did not fix its grade.

Appeal from an order of the special term, Westchester county, appointing commissioners to assess damages for the change of grade of a street in the village of Tarrytown.

*J. S. Millard,*for app’lt; *L. T. Yale,*for resp’t.

Barrard, P. J.

The village of Tarrytown, an incorporated village of the state, in 1888, opened John street from its northerly end to Main street. The street, before its extension, had been a *cul de sac.*The petitioner conveyed to the village the right to extend John street to Main street. The petitioner owned lands both upon the old and the new parts of John street. After the opening of the new portion as a public highway, the village, by resolution, cut down and changed the surface and level of the street, in both the old and new parts, so as to make the plaintiff’s lands from eighteen inches to seven feet above the grade of *273the changed street. By chapter 113, Laws of 1883, it is provided that when the grade of any street in any incorporated village shall be changed, so as to interfere with the buildings, or the use thereof, or when such change shall injure the real property, the owner may have a commission appointed to appraise the damages sustained. The plaintiff’s case is embraced by the terms of this act. It is no answer to the application for the commission that John street, before the change, was a public street, and that the village did not fix its grade. The village took the street for the purposes of this act, as it was, and a change in grade thereafter made, causing damages to the land owner, was within the act. The fact that the extension of John street was under a deed from the petitioner has no materiality. The deed was for a" public road, “and for no other uses or purposes.” The road once established, the petitioner was to be compensated for a change of grade in the street injurious to her, equally with other owners of land on the street.

The order should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Pratt, J., concurs; Dykman, J., not sitting.
#### Marie Woodward, Respondent, *v.*Oliver Vanier, as Executor of Anna W. Richardson, Deceased, Appellant.

Argued January 18, 1937;

decided March 9, 1937.

*H. C. Stratton*and *Charles D. Clinton*for appellant.

*James B. Gitlitz*and *Peter J. Wacks*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs payable out of the estate; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughban, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Berry Plastics Corporation (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 26, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
James M. Kratochvil, the Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.








/s/ James M.
Kratochvil


James M.
Kratochvil


Executive
Vice-President, Chief Financial


Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary





Date:           November
24, 2009
§ 1919.3 Application for accreditation. ( a ) *Application.* Any person seeking accreditation shall file an original and duplicate copy of an application for accreditation with the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C. 20210, on a form provided by the Administration for this purpose. Each application shall be signed and certified by the applicant and, if the applicant is an agency or organization, by a responsible officer of such agency or organization.
( b ) *Contents of application.* The application form shall include the following information: ( 1 ) A statement detailing the applicable types of work performed by the applicant in the past, noting the amount and extent of such work performed within the previous three years, listing representative vessels involved, and including representative job orders, if available, or equivalent evidence;
( 2 ) Descriptive details concerning any testing instruments and heat treatment furnaces which are to be used in conducting required tests or heat treatments. Test reports indicating that instruments meet the accuracy standards set forth in this part shall be included;
( 3 ) A list setting forth the ports in which applicant currently conducts his business as well as those in which he proposes to conduct gear certification activities;
( 4 ) A list of the applicant's responsible qualified personnel, both supervisory and managerial and including any surveyors, with resumes of their individual experience in the testing, examination, inspection and heat treatment of cargo gear. Such list shall include any branch office personnel or surveyors appointed to act in the applicant's behalf in any of the ports of the United States: *Provided, however,* That where the submission of individual resumes would be unduly burdensome because of the large number of persons engaged in the applicant's behalf, the applicant, after stating this fact, need only submit a list of its personnel together with a detailed statement of the qualifications upon which the appointment of surveyors is based;
( 5 ) A detailed schedule of the fees proposed to be charged for the various gear certification services;
( 6 ) Evidence of financial stability;
( 7 ) Names of at least three business references who will furnish information regarding work performed by applicant;
( 8 ) Any additional information the applicant deems to be pertinent.
(Section 1919.3 contains a collection of information which has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under OMB Control No. 1218-0003) [39 FR 22096, June 19, 1974, as amended at 61 FR 5509, Feb. 13, 1996]
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4784 

To extend the Generalized System of Preferences, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 1, 2020 

Mr. GRASSLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the Generalized System of Preferences, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF 

4 PREFERENCES. 

5 Section 505 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 

6 2465) is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2020’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘April 30, 2022’’. 

8 SEC. 2. CUSTOMS USER FEES. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 13031(j)(3) of the Con10 solidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 

11 U.S.C. 58c(j)(3)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4784 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘October 

2 21, 2029’’ and inserting ‘‘November 25, 2029’’; and 

3 (2) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking ‘‘Octo4 ber 21, 2029’’ and inserting ‘‘November 25, 2029’’. 

5 (b) RATE FOR MERCHANDISE PROCESSING FEES.— 

6 Section 503 of the United States–Korea Free Trade 

7 Agreement Implementation Act (Public Law 112–41; 19 

8 U.S.C. 3805 note) is amended by striking ‘‘October 21, 

9 2029’’ and inserting ‘‘November 25, 2029’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Form of Second Charter Amendment



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
 SECOND CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO THE 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

 OF 
 SPORTS PROPERTIES ACQUISITION CORP. 
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 242 OF THE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW 
 OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 Sports Properties Acquisition Corp. (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the provisions
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “General Corporation Law”), hereby certifies that: 
 1. The Corporation’s original Certificate of Incorporation was filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on July 3, 2007, its Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation was filed in the office of the Secretary of the State of Delaware on January 17, 2008 and its Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation was filed in the office of the Secretary of the
State of Delaware on                     , 20     (the “Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation”). 
 2. The Board of Directors of the Corporation, pursuant to Section 242 of the General
Corporation Law, duly adopted a resolution setting forth proposed amendments to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and declaring such amendments advisable. The stockholders of the Corporation, pursuant to Section 242 of the
General Corporation Law, duly approved and adopted such proposed amendment at a special meeting of stockholders duly called and held upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law. 
 3. The Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended by deleting Article FIFTH thereof in its entirety and inserting
the following in lieu thereof: 
 “Article FIFTH: Reserved.” 
 [The remainder of this page has been left intentionally blank.] 
  

 1 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Sports Properties Acquisition Corp. has caused this Second Certificate
of Amendment to be signed by Tony Tavares, its Chief Executive Officer, on the              day of
                    , 20    . 
  

	
	  

	Tony Tavares, Chief Executive Officer


  

 2
#### JAFFE et v POWELL et

Ohio Supreme Court

No. 21699.

Decided November 27, 1929

Syllabus by

DAY, J.

REAL ESTATE — Negligence (370 N)

(5Í0 Le) In an action for damages against an owner of premises for negli*736gently creating and allowing to exist a fire hazard thereon, as a result of which a fire is claimed to have occurred, causing loss of property by tenants of such owner, proof of the occurence of previous fires-at the same place and under substantially the same conditions as those involved in the action, not too remote in time, which are reported to such owner, is competent, not as showing an independent act of negligence but for the purpose of showing knowledge on the part of such owner of the existence of such fire hazard and tending to show the .common cause of such fires as due to a dangerous condition of such premises.

Marshall, C. J., Kinkade, Jones and Allen, JJ., concur.
DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE

$65,000.00                                                        April 17, 2000


     On demand, the Undersigned, for value received promises to pay to the order
of TravelNow.com Inc., a Florida Corporation, at its office at 318 Park Central
East, Suite 418, Springfield, MO 65806, together with interest thereon from the
date hereof until paid at the rate of 8.0% per annum until demand and at the
rate of 8.0% per annum after demand, all interest being payable annually.



                                               /s/ Jeffrey A. Wasson
                                               ----------------------------
                                               Jeffrey A. Wasson
#### BRUNO v STATE

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9766.

Decided April 22, 1929

Galen & Firestone, Cleveland, for Bruno.

Leo Weil, Cleveland, for State.

VICKERY, PJ.

We have gone over this record, heard the argument of counsel for the plaintiff in error ,and for the City of Cleveland, and have come to the conclusion that the judgment must be reversed, for the reason that there is no evidence in this record which would tend to prove that the plaintiff in error was the keeper of the dwelling described in the affidavit and in the evidence. The evidence at best does not show that she is anything more than an inmate of the house, and there is no evidence that she was the owner or lessee or proprietor or in any way in charge of the place that was claimed *303to have been keptjor the purpose of lewdness.

The judgment of the court below will, therefore, be reversed, and inasmuch as there is no evidence to sustain the conviction on the affidavit upon which she was charged, the plaintiff in error will be discharged.

Sullivan and Levine, JJ. concur in judgment.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ELI STAV,

Appellant,

v.

BROWARD COLLEGE,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3058

[July 16, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; William W. Haury, Judge; L.T. Case No. 19-003789.

Thomas Damian Sclafani, Scalfani & Associates, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, 

for appellant.

Eric K. Gabrielle of Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, 

P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.