alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Morgan Jones *et al.,*App’lts, *v.*Joseph M. Hawes *et al.*and Adelaide Jones, Resp’ts.

*(New York Superior Court,*

*General Term,*

*Filed March, 1889.)*

Pleading—Motion to strike matter *out of*answer *for*irrelevancy —When not granted—Ejectment.

In an action of ejectment, by heirs of a grantor, for the benefit of his grantee, against persons holding adversely to the grantor, one of the heirs, being a minor over fourteen years of age, was made defendant. Her answer, by guardian *ad litem,,*admitted that the defendants, other than herself, were holding adversely to plaintiffs and herself, but alleged that the alleged deed to the grantor had been obtained by fraud, and was void, and in her prayer for relief asked that the deed might be cancelled and that she and plaintiffs might recover the lands as tenants in common. *Held,*that the new matter in the answer being relevant to the position taken by defendant, though that position may not have been correct, could not be stricken out as irrelevant.

*821Appeal from an order of special term denying plaintiffs’ motion to strike out portions of the answer as irrelevant.

Action of ejectment brought by Morgan Jones and others, as heirs of John Jones, deceased, against Joseph H. Hawes and others, and Adelaide Jones, to recover land held by the defendants, except Adelaide Jones, adversely to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs sued as the heirs of John Jones, deceased, for the benefit of Morgan Jones, to whom the deceased had conveyed the land. Adelaide Jones was also an heir of John Jones, deceased, but, being a minor over fourteen years of age, and refusing to have a guardian appointed, she was made a defendant. Her guardian *ad litem*filed an answer alleging her infancy, and admitting the possession of the defendants adversely to herself and the plaintiffs; and alleged that at the time of the so called conveyance to Morgan Jones, the deceased was of unsound' mind, and that if he executed said conveyance, it was obtained by fraud, and void, and in her prayer she asked that the deed be cancelled, and that plaintiffs and this defendant recover the land for their own benefit from the defendants.

*T. B.*Clarkson, for app’lts; *D. B. Ogden,*for resp’ts.

Sedgwick, Ch. J.

I am of opinion that the learned judge below did not err in refusing to strike out the allegations of the answer as irrelevant. They were not irrelevant to the position taken by the defendant, either as a defense or by way of counter-claim. Her position may not have been correct. That could not be determined against her, on the motion to strike out matter as irrelevant.

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

Truax, J., concurs.
Statement Pursuant to
Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The
undersigned, Sherry L. Couturier, CFO of American International Industries Inc.,
a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required by
Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the following
of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934: Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30,
2006.






The
undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
information contained in the above report fairly presents, in all respects, the
financial condition of American International Industries Inc. and results of its
operations.






Date:
March 18, 2008


Sherry L.
Couturier


CFO


/s/ Sherry L.
Couturier
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-28-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-30-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-28-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,031
<ALLOWANCES>                                       353
<INVENTORY>                                     12,119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,094
<PP&E>                                           7,996
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,008
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,957
<BONDS>                                         18,133
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,754
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,084)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,602
<SALES>                                         79,920
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,920
<CGS>                                           76,048
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,128
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,903
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   675
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,786
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,620)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,620)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     290
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (30,802)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.83)
        

</TABLE>
### Snoden, Barbara (OST} From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject:
Hi Susan, Snoden, Barbara (OST) Tuesday, June 11, 2013 2:30 PM sjollie@verizon.net Ultimate Jetcharters Request . . " . -_:·

## -- ,- ---- -'::::,,,-- n::: '·':!: j. i \ ,,



## - i /\
.

I am the analyst working on the UltimateJetcharters application for commuter authority. Below is a list ofthings I need to continue my review. I have tried to be as specific as possible but ifyou need clarification please give me a call. 1. Information on Mr. Maguires (Director ofSafety) Date of his employment with Ultimate and specifically date in DoS position His approximate total time (flight) 2. Information on Mr. Eby (Chief Pilot) Date in position as Chief Pilot Month in 2001 as employment as Pilot with Ultimate 3. In forecast documents (Exhibit Ultimate -704): Missing
...Page 2 of2nd Quarter ofOperations Missing
...Page 1 of4th Quarter 4. UltimateJetcharter December 31, 2011 Balance Sheet and 20111ncome Statement (have 2009, 2010, and 2012) Ifound one for Ultimate Jet, LLC but need one for Ultimate Jetcharters 5. Balance Sheet for 1st Quarter of2012 (March 31st) and income statement
Ithink that should do itfor now. Thanks! Barbara Barbara A. Snoden Transportation Industry Analyst US Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4834

1
---

EXHIBIT 99.6

CERTIFICATIONREQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE
15d-14(b) ANDSECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18OF THE
UNITED STATES CODE

Gildan Activewear Inc. (the Corporation) is filing its annual
report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2011 (the Report)
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

I, Glenn J. Chamandy, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

1.                The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.

Dated: December 9, 2011

| | /s/ Glenn J.
      Chamandy
| | ---------------------------
| | Name:                      
| | Title:                     

---

CERTIFICATIONREQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE
15d-14(b) ANDSECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18OF THE
UNITED STATES CODE

Gildan Activewear Inc. (the Corporation) is filing its annual
report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2011 (the Report)
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

I, Laurence G. Sellyn, Executive Vice-President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.                The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.

Dated: December 9, 2011

| | /s/ Laurence G.
      Sellyn
| | ----------------------------
| | Name:                       
| | Title:                      

---
§ 61.25 Change of name. ( a ) An application to change the name on a certificate issued under this part must be accompanied by the applicant's: ( 1 ) Airman certificate; and
( 2 ) A copy of the marriage license, court order, or other document verifying the name change.
( b ) The documents in paragraph (a) of this section will be returned to the applicant after inspection.
[Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16298, Apr. 4, 1997, as amended by Amdt. 61-124, 74 FR 42548, Aug. 21, 2009]
PUBLIC LAW 113–141—JULY 25, 2014 128 STAT. 1747 

Public Law 113–141 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To provide for the conveyance of the Forest Service Lake Hill Administrative Site 

in Summit County, Colorado. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lake Hill Administrative Site 

Affordable Housing Act’’. 

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

In this Act: 

(1) COUNTY.—The term ‘‘County’’ means Summit County, 

Colorado. 

(2) LAKE HILL ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.—The term ‘‘Lake Hill 

Administrative Site’’ means the parcel of approximately 40 

acres of National Forest System land in the County, as depicted 

on the map entitled ‘‘Lake Hill Administrative Site’’ and dated 

June 2012. 

(3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary 

of Agriculture. 

SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF FOREST SERVICE LAKE HILL ADMINISTRATIVE SITE, SUMMIT COUNTY, COLORADO. 

(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORITY.—Upon receipt of an offer from 

the County in which the County agrees to the condition imposed 

by subsection (c), the Secretary shall use the authority provided 

by the Forest Service Facility Realignment and Enhancement Act 

of 2005 (Public Law 109–54; 16 U.S.C. 580d note) to convey to 

the County all right, title, and interest of the United States in 

and to the Forest Service Lake Hill Administrative Site. 

(b) APPLICATION OF LAW.— 

(1) TREATMENT AS ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.—The Lake Hill 

Administrative Site is considered to be an administrative site 

under section 502(1)(A) of the Forest Service Facility Realignment and Enhancement Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–54; 16 

U.S.C. 580d note). 

(2) EXCEPTION.—Section 502(1)(C) of that Act does not 

apply to the conveyance of the Lake Hill Administrative Site. 

(c) COSTS.—The County shall be responsible for processing and 

transaction costs related to the direct sale under subsection (a). 

(d) PROCEEDS.—Proceeds received from the conveyance pursuant to subsection (a) shall be available, without further appropriation and until expended, for capital improvement and maintenance 

Lake Hill 

Administrative 

Site Affordable 

Housing Act. 

July 25, 2014 

[H.R. 2337] 


srobinson on DSKB307YQ1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
128 STAT. 1748 PUBLIC LAW 113–141—JULY 25, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2337: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113–196 (Comm. on Natural Resources). 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 113–173 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 159 (2013): Oct. 29, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 160 (2014): July 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

of Forest Service facilities in Region 2 of the United States Forest 

Service. 

Approved July 25, 2014. 


srobinson on DSKB307YQ1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
### FOR PUBLICATION 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  L UIS M ARIANO M ARTINEZ , No. 09-15170

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:08-cv-00785-JAT



#  C HARLES L. R YAN , Director of the District of Arizona, Arizona Department of Phoenix Corrections, ORDER

Respondent-Appellee. 

# 

On Remand From The United States Supreme Court

Filed May 29, 2012

Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Procter Hug, Jr., and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Opinion of the Supreme Court in Martinez v. Ryan , ___ U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct. 1309 (2012), inadequateassistance of counsel during initial review collateral proceedings may now establish cause for a prisoner’s default of aclaim of ineffective assistance at trial. The district court properly applied the law as it stood at the time of Martinez’s petition. However, by qualifying Coleman v. Thompson , 501 U.S. 722 (1991), the Supreme Court changed the law. Therefore, the district court’s denial of Martinez’s petition for habeas corpus on the basis that his claim was procedurally defaultedis REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

5871
#### § 1912a.3 Terms of membership.

Commencing on July 1, 1973, the terms of membership shall be divided into two classes, each consisting of six members. Members of the first class shall be appointed for a term of one year. Members of the second class shall be appointed for a term of two years. Thereafter, members shall be appointed for regular terms of two years. At all times the Committee shall be composed of representatives of management, labor, and occupational safety and health professions, and of the public. Appointment of a member to the Committee for a fixed time period shall not affect the authority of the Secretary to remove, in his or her discretion, any member at any time. If a member resigns or is removed before his or her term expires, the Secretary of Labor may appoint for the remainder of the unexpired term a new member who shall represent the same interest as his or her predecessor.

[67 FR 660, Jan. 7, 2002]
# EUR-Lex - 31997D0397 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31997D0397

**97/397/EC: Commission Decision of 12 June 1997 amending Decision 86/414/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Argentina approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 165 , 24/06/1997 P. 0013 - 0014 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 12 June 1997 amending Decision 86/414/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Argentina approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community (Text with EEA relevance) (97/397/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine animals and swine and fresh meat or meat products from third countries (1), as last amended by Directive 96/91/EC (2), and in particular Articles 4 (1) and 18 (1) thereof,

Whereas a list of establishments in Argentina, approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community, was drawn up initially by Commission Decision 86/414/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 94/463/EC (4);

Whereas a further Community on-the-spot visit to meat product establishments in Argentina has revealed that the level of hygiene in one establishment is satisfactory; whereas the list of establishments should be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 86/414/EEC is hereby replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 June 1997.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28.

(2) OJ No L 13, 16. 1. 1997, p. 26.

(3) OJ No L 237, 23. 8. 1986, p. 36.

(4) OJ No L 190, 26. 7. 1994, p. 21.

ANNEX

LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS APPROVED FOR THE IMPORTING OF MEAT PRODUCTS

>TABLE>
**Exhibit10.3**

***OWENS BROKERAGE, LTD.***

Commercial &Investment Properties

PropertyManagement

**LEASEEXTENSION - ANNEX SPACE**

This Rider Amends thatoriginal Lease dated June 1, 2003 between Kenilworth Systems Inc. [Tenant]and Nassau County P.B.A. [Landlord] for tenancy at 185 Willis Avenue — Mineola,N.Y...[second floor].

This Rider is effective **August 1**, 2003 until May 31, 2006and applies directly to the annexed space adjacent to the original Leasepremises.

All terms andrequirements of the aforementioned Lease prevail throughout this additionalperiod.  Consolidated rental for both suites will be $2,500.00 permonth.  This **includes four percentannual rental increase** as well as proportionate taxes over thebase year.

*Securitywill increase to a total of $4,255.00.  Two months for the original spaceand one month for the additional space.*
| ACCEPTED: |   | /s/ Herbert Lindo, President             |   | DATED: |   | August 12, 2003 |
|-----------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------|
|      |   | KENILWORTH SYSTEMS INC {TENANT}          |   |   |   |                 |
|      |   |                                     |   |   |   |                 |
| ACCEPTED: |   | /s/ Pete Owens, Agent for Landlord       |   | DATED: |   | August 12, 2003 |
|      |   | NASSAU COUNTY P>B>A> {LANDLORD} |   |   |   |                 |

 

499 Jericho Tpke. *Mineola, New York 11501

Tel: 516-294-0010 *1-888-303-3847 * Fax: 516-294-1278

www.owensbrokerage.com

 

----
#### § 102.179 Motions for default judgment, summary judgment, or dismissal referred to Chief Administrative Law Judge.

During any period when the Board lacks a quorum, all motions for default judgment, summary judgment, or dismissal filed or pending pursuant to § 102.50 will be referred to the Chief Administrative Law Judge in Washington, DC, for ruling. Such rulings by the Chief Administrative Law Judge, and orders in connection therewith, may not be appealed directly to the Board, but will be considered by the Board in reviewing the record if exception to the ruling or order is included in the statement of exceptions filed with the Board pursuant to § 102.46.

[82 FR 11786, Feb. 24, 2017]
exv10w20w2







Exhibit 10.20.2




Addendum to

Relocation Agreement




     This Addendum to the Relocation Proposal dated August 23, 2006 (the “Relocation Agreement”)
between Insteel Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) and James F. Petelle (“Petelle”) updates and
amends the Relocation Agreement as set forth below.



     The Company and Petelle agree that the incidental relocation costs referred to in paragraph 2
of the Relocation Agreement have substantially been incurred by Petelle and will be paid on or
before September 30, 2009 at the rate of 4% of an assumed sale price of Petelle’s home in
Northbrook, Illinois, of $640,000. This amount will be grossed up for tax purposes, and will
eventually be adjusted up or down based on the ultimate actual sale price of the Northbrook home.



     Insteel and Petelle further agree that the only amounts that remain payable hereafter under
the Relocation Agreement shall be (i) the actual costs of a broker’s commission, not to exceed 6%
(to be grossed up) and (ii) reasonable costs incurred in moving household goods from Northbrook to
Mount Airy. These amounts shall be paid after such costs are actually incurred.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Insteel Industries, Inc.	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	By:
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	James F. Petelle	 	 
	Date:

	 	 	 	 	 	Date:
§ 1919.6 Criteria governing accreditation to certificate vessels' cargo gear. ( a ) ( 1 ) A person applying for accreditation to issue registers and pertinent certificates, to maintain registers and appropriate records, and to conduct initial, annual and quinquennial surveys, shall not be accredited unless that person is engaged in one or more of the following activities: ( i ) Classification of vessels;
( ii ) Certification of vessels' cargo gear;
( iii ) Shipbuilding or ship repairing, or both insofar as related to work on vessels' cargo handling gear;
( iv ) Unit and loose gear testing of vessels' cargo handling gear.
( 2 ) Applicants for accreditation under paragraph (a)(1) of this section for operations in coastal or Great Lakes ports who come within paragraph (a)(1) (ii) or (iv) shall not be accredited unless they conduct at least 1,500 hours of cargo gear certification work per year.
( b ) A person applying for accreditation to carry out tests of loose gear or wire rope, or both, or to carry out heat treatments, and to issue the related certificates, shall be engaged in one or both of the following activities: ( 1 ) Testing of loose gear or wire rope, or both;
( 2 ) Heat treatment of chains and loose cargo gear.
( c ) ( 1 ) A person applying for accreditation shall be staffed by individuals technically qualified to conduct the inspections and examinations and to conduct or supervise tests and heat treatments prescribed in this part. Any representatives, agents or surveyors acting on behalf of a person applying for accreditation in ports in which such operations are conducted shall be similarly qualified.
( 2 ) Accreditation to conduct such nondestructive examination as may be a part of any certification activity may be granted to applicants found competent and equipped to carry out this activity.
( d ) Except as noted in § 1919.1(c), and unless exemptions are granted under § 1919.10(h), a person applying for accreditation as specified in paragraph (a) of this section shall be prepared to carry out all of the requirements of subparts C, D, and E, of this part except that loose gear and wire rope tests and heat treatments may be carried out by the manufacturer of the gear concerned or by another person accredited specifically for this purpose.
( e ) A person applying for accreditation shall have a satisfactory record of performance, and shall be in sound financial condition.
[39 FR 22096, June 19, 1974, as amended at 76 FR 33610, June 8, 2011]
#### § 18.24 Briefs from amicus curiae.

The United States or an officer or agency thereof, or a State, Territory, Commonwealth, or the District of Columbia may file an amicus brief without the consent of the parties or leave of the judge. Any other amicus curiae may file a brief only by leave of the judge, upon the judge's request, or if the brief states that all parties have consented to its filing. A request for leave to file an amicus brief must be made by written motion that states the interest of the movant in the proceeding. The deadline for submission of an amicus brief will be set by the presiding judge.
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.759 Falling object protection. ( a ) *Securing loose items aloft.* All materials, equipment, and tools, which are not in use while aloft, shall be secured against accidental displacement.
( b ) *Protection from falling objects other than materials being hoisted.* The controlling contractor shall bar other construction processes below steel erection unless overhead protection for the employees below is provided.