alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1620.10 Meaning of “wages.”

Under the EPA, the term “wages” generally includes all payments made to [or on behalf of] an employee as remuneration for employment. The term includes all forms of compensation irrespective of the time of payment, whether paid periodically or deferred until a later date, and whether called wages, salary, profit sharing, expense account, monthly minimum, bonus, uniform cleaning allowance, hotel accommodations, use of company car, gasoline allowance, or some other name. Fringe benefits are deemed to be remuneration for employment. “Wages” as used in the EPA (the purpose of which is to assure men and women equal remuneration for equal work) will therefore include payments which may not be counted under section 3(m) of the FLSA toward the minimum wage (the purpose of which is to assure employees a minimum amount of remuneration unconditionally available in cash or in board, lodging or other facilities). Similarly, the provisions of section 7(e) of the FLSA under which some payments may be excluded in computing an employee's “regular rate” of pay for purposes of section 7 do not authorize the exclusion of any such remuneration from the “wages” of an employee in applying the EPA. Thus, vacation and holiday pay, and premium payments for work on Saturdays, Sundays, holidays, regular days of rest or other days or hours in excess or outside of the employee's regular days or hours of work are deemed remuneration for employment and therefore wage payments that must be considered in applying the EPA, even though not a part of the employee's “regular rate.”
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 856 

To terminate authorization for the project for navigation, Rockport Harbor, 

Maine. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 13, 2007 

Ms. SNOWE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To terminate authorization for the project for navigation, 

Rockport Harbor, Maine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF AUTHORIZATION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The portion of the project for 

5 navigation, Rockport Harbor, Maine, authorized by the 

6 first section of the Act of August 11, 1888 (25 Stat. 400), 

7 located within the 12-foot anchorage described in sub8 section (b) is not authorized. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 856 IS

1 (b) DESCRIPTION OF ANCHORAGE.—The anchorage 

2 referred to in subsection (a) is more particularly described 

3 as— 

4 (1) beginning at the westernmost point of the 

5 anchorage at N128800.00, E349311.00; 

6 (2) thence running north 12 degrees, 52 min7 utes, 37.2 seconds, east 127.08 feet to a point at 

8 N128923.88, E349339.32; 

9 (3) thence running north 17 degrees, 40 min10 utes, 13.0 seconds, east 338.61 feet to a point at 

11 N129246.51, E349442.10; 

12 (4) thence running south 89 degrees, 21 min13 utes, 21.0 seconds, east 45.36 feet to a point at 

14 N129246.00, E349487.46; 

15 (5) thence running south 44 degrees, 13 min16 utes, 32.6 seconds, east 18.85 feet to a point at 

17 N129232.49, E349500.61; 

18 (6) thence running south 17 degrees, 40 min19 utes 13.0 seconds, west 340.50 feet to a point at 

20 N128908.06, E349397.25; 

21 (7) thence running south 12 degrees, 52 min22 utes, 37.2 seconds, west 235.41 feet to a point at 

23 N128678.57, E349344.79; and 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•S 856 IS

1 (8) thence running north 15 degrees, 32 min2 utes, 59.3 seconds, west 126.04 feet to the point of 

3 origin. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### James S. Graham et al., Respondents, v. James B. Fisher et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another.

Argued March 17, 1937;

decided April 20, 1937.

*653
      *Joseph Diehl Fackenthal*and *Bruce E. Grunden*for appellants.

*Samuel Okin*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed,«with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification ofPrincipal Executive Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

I, Joseph Loggia, certifythat:

(1)   Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Advanstar CommunicationsInc. (the “registrant”);

(2)   Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)   Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

(4)   Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  [Reserved]

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(d) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

(5) The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: April 2, 2007 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Joseph  Loggia      |   |
|---------------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                |   |   |   | Joseph Loggia           |
|                |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|                |   |   |   |                    |

 

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.354 Welding, cutting, and heating in way of preservative coatings. ( a ) Before welding, cutting, or heating is commenced on any surface covered by a preservative coating whose flammability is not known, a test shall be made by a competent person to determine its flammability. Preservative coatings shall be considered to be highly flammable when scrapings burn with extreme rapidity.
( b ) Precautions shall be taken to prevent ignition of highly flammable hardened preservative coatings. When coatings are determined to be highly flammable, they shall be stripped from the area to be heated to prevent ignition.
( c ) Protection against toxic preservative coatings: ( 1 ) In enclosed spaces, all surfaces covered with toxic preservatives shall be stripped of all toxic coatings for a distance of at least 4 inches from the area of heat application, or the employees shall be protected by air line respirators, meeting the requirements of subpart E of this part.
( 2 ) In the open air, employees shall be protected by a respirator, in accordance with requirements of subpart E of this part.
( d ) The preservative coatings shall be removed a sufficient distance from the area to be heated to ensure that the temperature of the unstripped metal will not be appreciably raised. Artificial cooling of the metal surrounding the heating area may be used to limit the size of the area required to be cleaned.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                          59,351
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,736
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    421,191
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               494,027
<PP&E>                                       1,043,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                 272,821
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,288,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          611,422
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              533
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,034
<OTHER-SE>                                     383,807
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,288,256
<SALES>                                      1,201,375
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,201,375
<CGS>                                          850,494
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  850,494
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               992,077
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             128,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (755,617)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.25)


</TABLE>
#### § 1690.101 Subject.

Procedures on Interagency Coordination of Equal Employment Opportunity Issuances.
#### § 1912.42 Reservation.

The policies and procedures set forth in this part are intended for general application. In specific situations where the Assistant Secretary determines that different policies or procedures would better serve the objectives of the Act, such policies or procedures may be modified upon appropriate notice to any persons affected by the modification to the extent that such policies or procedures are consistent with the Federal Advisory Committee Act and OMB Circular A-63, and are approved by the Solicitor under part 15 of this title.
§ 102.153 Administrative Law Judge's decision; contents; service; transfer of case to the Board; contents of record in case. ( a ) Upon conclusion of proceedings under §§ 102.147 through 102.152, the Administrative Law Judge will prepare a decision, which will include written findings and conclusions as necessary to dispose of the application. The Administrative Law Judge will transmit the decision to the Board. Upon receipt of the decision, the Board will enter an order transferring the case to the Board and will serve copies on all the parties of the Judge's decision and the Board's order, setting forth the date of the transfer.
( b ) The record in a proceeding on an application for an award of fees and expenses includes the application and any amendments or attachments, the net worth exhibit, the answer and any amendments or attachments, any reply to the answer, any comments by other parties, motions, rulings, orders, stipulations, written submissions, the transcript of any oral argument, the transcript of any hearing, exhibits, and depositions, together with the Administrative Law Judge's decision and exceptions, any cross-exceptions or answering briefs as provided in § 102.46, and the record of the adversary adjudication upon which the application is based.
[82 FR 11783, Feb. 24, 2017]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         390,524
<SECURITIES>                                 1,539,936
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,523,227
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (138,236)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,136,326
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,472,199
<PP&E>                                       2,018,209
<DEPRECIATION>                               (476,585)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,645,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,391,738
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       162,256
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,300,023
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,645,413
<SALES>                                      7,063,115
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,063,115
<CGS>                                        5,975,133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,975,133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,487,863
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              86,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (542,830)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (542,830)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (542,830)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
#### GLOBE INDEM CO v WASSMAN SAME v FINNELL SAME v BROWN-GRAVES CO

Ohio Supreme Court

Nos. 21215, 21216 & 21217.

Decided Mar. 6, 1929

Syllabus by

JONES, J.

ESTOPPEL

(265) In order to avail himself of proof of a waiver or estoppel a party, having opportunity therefor, must allege in his pleading facts invoking that equitable relief.

PLEADINGS

(440 S2) Claimants for labor and material who plead performance by complying with Section 2365-3, General Code, and Who allege also that such compliance was waived by the conduct and representations of the surety, do not plead inconsistent causes of action but plead rather two distinct grounds, either one of which if proven, would sustain a recovery.

ACTIONS

(10 Cd) Where a plaintiff is uncertain as to which of the two grounds stated in his petition he may be able to prove in order to recover against, a defendant and it is uncertain as to which of the two he can safely plead, he cannot be required to elect .upon which of the two grounds he will stand.

REAL ESTATE

(510 Md) Section 2365-3, General Code, in effect May 8, 1925, provided that a person performing labor or furnishing, material in the construction of a building shall, within ninety days after the acceptance of the building, furnish the surety with a statement of the amount due. Where the building is a school building erected by a board of education, the forwarding of a statement by a claimant to the clerk of the board is not a compliance with that section, even though the surety has knowledge of its contents. Such statement should be furnished to the surety by the claimant or by his attorney or agent duly authorized to present it to the surety after acceptance of the building.

GUARANTY

(280 Sa) Where the authorized agent of a surety company represents to claimants, who are required to furnish the surety with a statement under Section 2365-8, General Code, that their claims are correct and will be paid and that the claimants need do nothing further in respect to their claims, and, relying upon such representations, the claimants fail to comply with such statutory requirement and by reason of such assurance are induced to inaction thereby altering their position to their prejudice, the surety is estopped from thereafter asserting its right to a compliance with the statute on the part of the claimants.

TRIAL

(590. V2) Where a jury returns a general verdict for plaintiff in a case where the issues of performance and estoppel are both pleaded as grounds for recovery and there is failure of proof as to performance, a defendant, under Section 11463, General Code, has a right to request the court to submit to the jury special findings which may elicit the fact that its verdict was based solely on the issue of performance; but a special finding that its verdict was based on that issue is not inconsistent with the general verdict, as it evidences the fact that the verdict was also based on the other issue. In order to control the general verdict the findings should have been so framed as to elicit the fact that the verdict was based on performance alone.

Marshall, CJ, Kinkade, Robinson, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ, concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of UC HUB
GROUP,  INC.  for  the  quarter  ending October 31, 2005, I, Larry Wilcox, Chief
Executive  Officer  of  UC HUB GROUP, INC., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge  and  belief,  that:

     1.     Such  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending October
31,  2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.     The  information  contained  in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for  the  quarter  ending  October  31,  2005,  fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of UC HUB GROUP,
INC.

     Dated:  January 20, 2006.

                                     /s/  Larry Wilcox
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                     Larry Wilcox, Chief Executive Officer
                                     of UC HUB GROUP, INC.


<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

National Defense University, National Security Education Program, Department of the Army.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of a forthcoming meeting of the National Security Education Board. The purpose of the meeting is to review and make recommendations to the Secretary of Defense concerning requirements established by the David L. Boren National Security Education Act, Title VII of Public Law 102-183, as amended.

# DATES:

June 13, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

The Crystal City Marriott Hotel, 1999 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22202.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Edmond J. Collier, Deputy Director for Programs, National Security Education Program, 1101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1210, Rosslyn, Virginia 22209-2248; (703) 696-1991. Electronic mail address: colliere@ndu.edu.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Board meeting is open to the public.

Dated: May 12, 2000.

L. M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-12464  Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 97 (Thursday, May 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31580-31581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12536]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections

[[Page 31581]]

552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant 
applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Initial Review Group, Biomedical Research and Research 
Training Review Subcommittee A.
    Date: June 13, 2000.
    Time: 8 am to 6 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Carole H. Latker, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher 
Building, Room 1AS-13, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-3663.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: May 10, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-12536 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M