alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2 **CERTIFICATIONS   
I, Raymond L. Carr, certify that:  
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Kentucky Investors, Inc.;  
2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;  
4.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and we have:   
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared,   
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation, and   
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  
5.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:   
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and   
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  
Date: March 24, 2006
By: /s/ Raymond L. Carr 
Raymond L. Carr 
Chief Financial Officer -- Vice President

 ****
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.851 Stairs, passageways, and ladders. ( a ) Only those stairways, passageways, and ladders, designated as means of access to the structure of a building, shall be used. Other access ways shall be entirely closed at all times.
( b ) All stairs, passageways, ladders and incidental equipment thereto, which are covered by this section, shall be periodically inspected and maintained in a clean safe condition.
( c ) In a multistory building, when a stairwell is being used, it shall be properly illuminated by either natural or artificial means, and completely and substantially covered over at a point not less than two floors below the floor on which work is being performed, and access to the floor where the work is in progress shall be through a properly lighted, protected, and separate passageway.
#### Bertha E. Martin, as Administratrix, etc., App’lt, *v.*Spencer C. Platt and ano., Resp’ts.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,*

*Filed May 24, 1889.)*

Practice—Case—Extension of time to make case—How granted.

When the time within which to make and serve a case has expired, leave extending the time can only he granted upon motion, and as a matter of favor and not as matter of right.

Appeal from order denying motion to vacate an order . granted *ex parte,*extending time to serve a case.

*Edward S. Clinch,*for app’lt; *William G. Wilson,*for resp’ts. j

Van Brunt, P. J.

That a motion may be made for a new trial, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of evidence,¡ after the hearing of the exceptions at the general term, seems to be expressly sanctioned by section 1006 of the Code.

Section 997, prescribes the practice in the making and settling a case preparatory to a motion for a new trial. It provides that the njoving party must make a case, and procure the same to be settled, as prescribed by the general rules of practice.

*663Buie 32, of the general rules of practice provides that whenever it shall be necessary to make a case, it shall be made and served if the trial, has been before a jury within ten days after the trial or within ten days after notice of the decision of a motion for a new trial, if such motion be made and be not ¡decided at the time of trial or within ten days after notice of judgment under section 1185 of the Code.

Section 1185 refers only to cases where a verdict is taken, subject to the opinion of the court, and has no bearing upon the question now before the court.

It would appear, therefore, that a case must be made, if the trial is by a jury within ten days after the trial, and that the extension until ten days notice of the decision of a motion for new trial, refers only to motions made at the trial, because it speaks of the contingency of such motions being not decided at the time of trial, which could not refer to motions for new trial, which were not made after the trial.

We think, therefore, that the time to make a case had. expired, and that leave to make a case could only be granted upon motion as a matter of favor, and not as matter of right.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Daniels, and Brady, JJ„ concur.
§ 61.407 What aeronautical knowledge must I have to apply for a flight instructor certificate with a sport pilot rating? ( a ) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section you must receive and log ground training from an authorized instructor on the fundamentals of instruction that includes: ( 1 ) The learning process.
( 2 ) Elements of effective teaching.
( 3 ) Student evaluation and testing.
( 4 ) Course development.
( 5 ) Lesson planning.
( 6 ) Classroom training techniques.
( b ) You must receive and log ground training from an authorized instructor on the aeronautical knowledge areas applicable to a sport pilot certificate for the aircraft category and class in which you seek flight instructor privileges.
( c ) You do not have to meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section if you— ( 1 ) Hold a flight instructor certificate or ground instructor certificate issued under this part;
( 2 ) Hold a teacher's certificate issued by a State, county, city, or municipality; or
( 3 ) Are employed as a teacher at an accredited college or university.
[Doc. No. FAA-2001-11133, 69 FR 44875, July 27, 2004, as amended by Amdt. 61-124, 74 FR 42562, Aug. 21, 2009]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 861 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 861

  To designate the Federal building located at 131 East 4th Street in 
      Davenport, Iowa, as the ``James A. Leach Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 13, 2007

  Mr. Grassley (for himself and Mr. Harkin) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the Federal building located at 131 East 4th Street in 
      Davenport, Iowa, as the ``James A. Leach Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 131 East 4th Street in Davenport, 
Iowa, shall be known and designated as the ``James A. Leach Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James A. Leach 
Federal Building''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1915.157 Hand and body protection. ( a ) *Use.* The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate hand protection and other protective clothing where there is exposure to hazards such as skin absorption of harmful substances, severe cuts or lacerations, severe abrasions, punctures, chemical burns, thermal burns, harmful temperature extremes, and sharp objects.
( b ) *Hot work operations.* The employer shall ensure that no employee wears clothing impregnated or covered in full or in part with flammable or combustible materials (such as grease or oil) while engaged in hot work operations or working near an ignition source.
( c ) *Electrical protective devices.* The employer shall ensure that each affected employee wears protective electrical insulating gloves and sleeves or other electrical protective equipment, if that employee is exposed to electrical shock hazards while working on electrical equipment.
#### In the Matter of Sportsmen’s Association for Firearms Education, Inc., Appellant, v Donald F. Kane, as Commissioner of the Police Department of the County of Nassau, et al., Respondents.

[698 NYS2d 170]

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondents to disclose certain documents pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law art 6), the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Feuerstein, J.), dated September 8, 1998, which, *inter alia,*dismissed the proceeding.

*397Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the Supreme Court properly refused to compel the disclosure of information protected by Penal Law § 400.00 (5) *(see,*Public Officers Law § 87 [2] [a]; *Matter of Tartan Oil Corp. v State of N. Y. Dept. of Taxation & Fin.,*239 AD2d 36).

The petitioner’s remaining contention is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.
LAINE

S a s k a t c h e w a n S a s k a t c h e w a n

Glasgo

§ ̈¦15 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

HiLine District Office
 

Fluid Mineral Leasing Potential 

Map shows

Leases for Oil

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data

for individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by the BLM.

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed

through digital means and information may be updated without notification. 

the Development Potential and Existing

and Gas on BLM administered subsurface. 

AAll t bbeerrt aa

Nat

Glaci

i

er 

onal Park 

Blackfeet Indian

Reservation

GLACIER 

£¤89

S Sa as sk ka attc ch he ew wa an n

Browning 

Cut Bank 

LIBERTY HILL

TOOLE

by	 Shel £¤2

Chester 

CHOUTEAU
 

232 

66
 £¤191

VALLEY Fort Benton 

PHILLIPS 

CCMMRRNNaattiioonnaall

WWiillddlliiffeeRReeffuuggee 

")

")

£¤87

BLAINE
 

Havre 

Chinook 

Rocky Boy's Ft. Belknap Malta Indian Reservation Indian Reservation

Glasgow 

Development Potential 

High

Moderate 

Low 

Very Low

Authorized Leases 

® 

0	 12.5 25 50

Miles

1:1,500,000 

High Interest Areas 

RMP boundary

County Line 

Interstate 

Highway or State Route 

Towns 

B 

Chinook 

Bears Paw South North Blaine

Albers Equal Area, NAD83, Meters

Created by the Malta Field Office in December 2012 

Bowdoin 

Map E.1 

! H i L i n e R M P

Kalispell 

Great

Falls ! 

!Lewistown ^Helena

	 M

C

iles ! ! ity

Butte !Billings Malta
#### Joe Caldwell, Eugene Faircloth and Harvey Hattaway, *Plaintiffs in Error, v.*The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

An appellate court should not grand a new trial in a criminal case upon the ground that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict affirmed by the trial court, if there is some evidence of all the facts legally essential to sustain the verdict as found, and the whole evidence is such that the.verdict may have fairly been found on it. In the appellate court the presumption is that the jury and the trial court did their duty in the case.

This case was decided by Division A.

Writ of error to the Criminal Conrt of Record for Walton County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*D. Stuart*Gillis, for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Park Trammell,*Attorney General, for the State.

Per Curiam-

— The plaintiffs in error were convicted and sentenced to the Reform School for aiding, encouraging, counseling and abetting one Ted McDaniel in unlawfully entering without breaking a storehouse building of B. H. Jackson, with intent to commit a misdemeanor; to-wit: to steal property less than twenty dollars in value belonging to said Jackson.

The only contention here is that the evidence does not warrant the verdict. Ted McDaniel pleaded guilty and does not join in this writ of error.

*19An appellate court should not grant a new trial in a criminal case upon the ground that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict affirmed by the trial court, if there is some evidence of all the facts legally essential to sustain the verdict as found, and the whole evidence L such that the verdict may have fairly been found on it. In the appellate court the presumption is that the jury and the trial court did their duty in the case. McDonald v. State, 56 Fla. 74, 47 South. Rep. 485; Logan v. State, 58 Fla. 72, 50 South. Rep. 536.

Notwithstanding the testimony of the defendant McDaniel, who pleaded guilty, that as far as he knew the other defendants did not know anything about his getting the money from the house, he testified that they were at the place, and there are circumstances and fair inferences that may have been drawn from all the testimony, to show the guilt of all the defendants as found by the verdict under the information charging the offense.

Under these circumstances the appellate court will not disturb the verdict that has been approved by the trial court.

The judgments are affirmed.

, Whitfield, C. J., and Shackleford, and Cockrell, J. J., concur;

Taylor, Hocker and Parki-iill, J. J., concur in the opinion.
Exhibit
23
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-87216 of Kentucky Power Company on Form S-3 of our reports dated February
28, 2005 (which reports express unqualified opinions and include an explanatory
paragraph concerning the adoption of new accounting pronouncements in 2003 and
2004) relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules of
Kentucky Power Company appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Kentucky Power Company for the year ended December 31,
2004.
  
 /s/
Deloitte & Touche, LLP
 
 Columbus,
Ohio
 March 1,
2005
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2005326EN.01004001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 13.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 326/40 |

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1952/97 of 7 October 1997 amending Regulation (EC) No 1015/94 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of television camera systems originating in Japan

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 276 of 9 October 1997](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_1997_276_R_TOC)
)

On page 24, in recital (39):

for:

| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘(b) | JVC | | | | --- | --- | | — | (...) | | | | | --- | --- | | — | viewfinder VF-P116’, | |

read:

| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘(b) | JVC | | | | --- | --- | | — | (...) | | | | | --- | --- | | — | viewfinder VF-P116E’, | |

On page 28 in the Annex, opposite the company name ‘JVC’, in the column ‘Viewfinder’:

for:

‘VF-P116’,

read:

‘VF-P116E’.

---
# C_2004180EN.01000801.xml

| 13.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.1859 — ENI / GALP)

(2004/C 180/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 29 June 2000, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 300M1859. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 300M1859. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136596 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136596 

 COA: 283126 

Jackson CC: 05-001139-FC 

BRIAN KEITH COURTNEY SR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 9, 2008 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 4, 2012

t0827

Order 

September 4, 2012

145312

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145312

COA: 302856

Muskegon CC: 10-059344-FC

JUAN LUIS REYNA,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 24, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Theresa Sgarlata, Respondent, *v.*City of Schenectady, Appellant. (Actions Nos. 1 and 2.)

Argued May 28, 1937;

decided June 11, 1937.

*Thomas W. Wallace, Corporation Counsel (Arlen T. St Louis*of counsel), for appellant.

*John R. Parker*for respondent.

In each action, judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbe, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12558]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting of the Board of Directors,

TIME AND DATE: The Board of Directors of the Legal Services Corporation 
will meet on May 25, 2000, via conference call. The meeting will begin 
at 4:00 p.m. and continue until conclusion of the Board's agenda.

LOCATION: 750 First Street, NE, 11th Floor, Washington, DC 20002, in 
Room 11026.

STATUS OF MEETING: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. Approval of the agenda.
    2. Consider and act on the Board of Director's comments on the 
Inspector General's Semiannual Report to Congress for the Period 
October 1, 1999 to March 31, 2000.
    3. Consider and act on other business.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Victor M. Fortuno, Vice President for 
Legal Affairs, (202) 336-8800.

SPECIAL NEEDS: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in 
alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments, 
Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend 
the meeting may notify Shannon Nicko Adaway, at (202) 336-8800.

    Dated: May 12, 2000
Victor M. Fortuno,
Vice President for Legal Affairs.
[FR Doc. 00-12558 Filed 5-15-00; 3:11 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
<PAGE>


                                                                 EXHIBIT 23

          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-98395, 033-64847 and 333-98393), Form S-4
(Nos. 333-100297 and 333-88962), and Form S-3 (No. 333-117833) of Kellwood
Company of our report dated March 10, 2005, except for Note 16 which is as
of March 15, 2005, and except for the restatement described in Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements and the matter discussed in the
penultimate paragraph of Management's Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting, as to which the date is January 11, 2006, relating to
the financial statements, management's assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to
Shareowners, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 2).


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
January 13, 2006