alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001. 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bio Tracking Security Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jean-Francois Amyot, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that: 

 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: November 22, 2004
#### § 1606.3 The national security exception.

It is not an unlawful employment practice to deny employment opportunities to any individual who does not fulfill the national security requirements stated in section 703(g) of title VII.[1]

###### Footnotes -
  1606.3

[1] See also, 5 U.S.C. 7532, for the authority of the head of a Federal agency or department to suspend or remove an employee on grounds of national security.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# TIME AND DATE: 

11 a.m., Friday, June 33, 2000.

# PLACE: 

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Surveillance Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-12361  Filed 5-12-00; 11:31 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joshua Torres, Appellant.

[697 NYS2d 528]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Demakos, J.), rendered December 10, 1996, convicting him of murder in the second degree (three counts), kidnapping in the first degree (two counts), and arson in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to indeterminate terms of 25 years to life imprisonment for each of his convictions for murder in the second degree to run concurrently with each other, an indeterminate term of 25 years to life imprisonment on his conviction for kidnapping in the first degree under count six of the indictment to run consecutively to his sentence for *410murder in the second degree under count two of the indictment and concurrently to his other sentences for murder in the second degree, an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 25 years to life for his conviction of kidnapping in the first degree under count seven of the indictment to run concurrently to his sentence for kidnapping in the first degree under count six of the indictment and to his sentences for murder in the second degree, and an indeterminate term of imprisonment of SVs to 25 years to life for his conviction for arson in the second degree to run consecutively to his other sentences.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by providing that the defendant’s term of imprisonment for his conviction of arson in the second degree shall run concurrently to the sentences imposed for the defendant’s convictions of three counts of murder in the second degree and kidnapping in the first degree under count seven of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he received ineffective assistance of counsel is without merit. Notwithstanding any purported deficiency in counsel’s performance, the defendant received meaningful representation under the totality of the circumstances *(see, People v Flores,*84 NY2d 184, 187; *People v Ellis,*81 NY2d 854, 856; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137).

The People correctly concede that the defendant’s convictions for arson in the second degree, three counts of murder in the second degree, and kidnapping in the first degree under count seven of the indictment were based on the same act. Thus, the Supreme Court erred in making the defendant’s sentence for his conviction of arson in the second degree run consecutively to his convictions for murder in the second degree and kidnapping in the first degree under count seven of the indictment. Accordingly, we modify that sentence to run concurrently *(see, People v Ramirez,*89 NY2d 444; *People v Laureano,*87 NY2d 640).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Jupiter Marine International
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Carl Herndon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: November 2, 2005


/s/ Carl Herndon
----------------
Carl Herndon
Chief Executive Officer
#### YOUNG v. YOUNG.

(Decided January 18, 1917.)

Appeal from Barbour Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. J. S. Williams.

No counsel marked for appellant.

Geo. W. Peach, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
# EUR-Lex - 32000D0649 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000D0649

**2000/649/EC: Commission Decision of 12 October 2000 amending Decision 94/442/EC setting up a conciliation procedure in the context of the clearance of the accounts of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) Guarantee Section (notified under document number C(2000) 2988) **

*
Official Journal L 272 , 25/10/2000 P. 0041 - 0041 *

Commission Decision

of 12 October 2000

amending Decision 94/442/EC setting up a conciliation procedure in the context of the clearance of the accounts of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) Guarantee Section

(notified under document number C(2000) 2988)

(2000/649/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the financing of the common agricultural policy(1), and in particular Article 7(5) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Since modern financial audit methods are becoming increasingly important in the EAGGF Guarantee Section accounts clearance procedure, the conciliation body should be composed not only of members who are highly qualified in EAGGF Guarantee Section matters, but also of members with a high level of practical financial audit experience. Commission Decision 94/442/EC setting up a conciliation procedure in the context of the clearance of the accounts of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) Guarantee Section(2) should be adapted accordingly.

(2) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 94/442/EC is hereby amended as follows:

The first subparagraph of Article 3(1) is replaced by the following:"The Body shall be composed of five members selected from among eminent persons offering every guarantee of independence and highly qualified in EAGGF Guarantee Section matters or in the practice of financial audit. They must be nationals of different Member States."

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 October 2000.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 103.

(2) OJ L 182, 16.7.1994, p. 45.
§ 10.29 Notice. ( a ) The contractor must notify all workers performing work on or in connection with a covered contract of the applicable minimum wage rate under the Executive Order. With respect to service employees on contracts covered by the Service Contract Act and laborers and mechanics on contracts covered by the Davis-Bacon Act, the contractor may meet this requirement by posting, in a prominent and accessible place at the worksite, the applicable wage determination under those statutes.
( b ) With respect to workers performing work on or in connection with a covered contract whose wages are governed by the FLSA, the contractor must post a notice provided by the Department of Labor in a prominent and accessible place at the worksite so it may be readily seen by workers.
( c ) Contractors that customarily post notices to workers electronically may post the notice electronically, provided such electronic posting is displayed prominently on any Web site that is maintained by the contractor, whether external or internal, and customarily used for notices to workers about terms and conditions of employment.
§ 18.12 Proceedings before administrative law judge. ( a ) *Designation.* The Chief Judge designates the presiding judge for all proceedings.
( b ) *Authority.* In all proceedings under this part, the judge has all powers necessary to conduct fair and impartial proceedings, including those described in the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 556. Among them is the power to: ( 1 ) Regulate the course of proceedings in accordance with applicable statute, regulation or executive order;
( 2 ) Administer oaths and affirmations and examine witnesses;
( 3 ) Compel the production of documents and appearance of witnesses within a party's control;
( 4 ) Issue subpoenas authorized by law;
( 5 ) Rule on offers of proof and receive relevant evidence;
( 6 ) Dispose of procedural requests and similar matters;
( 7 ) Terminate proceedings through dismissal or remand when not inconsistent with statute, regulation, or executive order;
( 8 ) Issue decisions and orders;
( 9 ) Exercise powers vested in the Secretary of Labor that relate to proceedings before the Office of Administrative Law Judges; and
( 10 ) Where applicable take any appropriate action authorized by the FRCP.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 3, 1999, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), the Water Heater Industry Joint Research and Development Consortium (“the Consortium”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, A. O. Smith Water Products Company, a division of A.O. Smith Corporation, Irving, TX has been added as a party to this venture.                 

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and the Consortium intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On February 28, 1995, the Consortium filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 27, 1995 (60 FR 15789).                 

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 17, 1999. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 1, 1999 (64 FR 53416).                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-12039  Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4706 

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 

with respect to the Louie B. Nunn (Cumberland) Parkway, to amend 

title 23, United States Code, to modify a provision relating to the 

operation of vehicles on that highway, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2020 

Mr. MCCONNELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency 

Act of 1991 with respect to the Louie B. Nunn (Cumberland) Parkway, to amend title 23, United States 

Code, to modify a provision relating to the operation 

of vehicles on that highway, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LOUIE B. NUNN (CUMBERLAND) PARKWAY. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION AS HIGH PRIORITY CORRIDOR.— 

5 Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation 

6 Efficiency Act of 1991 (Public Law 102–240; 105 Stat. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4706 IS

1 2032; 133 Stat. 3018) is amended by adding at the end 

2 the following: 

3 ‘‘(92) The Louie B. Nunn (Cumberland) Park4 way from the interchange with Interstate 65 in Bar5 ren County, Kentucky, east to the interchange with 

6 U.S. Highway 27 in Somerset, Kentucky.’’. 

7 (b) DESIGNATION AS FUTURE INTERSTATE.—Sec8 tion 1105(e)(5)(A) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor9 tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (Public Law 102–240; 109 

10 Stat. 597; 133 Stat. 3018) is amended in the first sen11 tence by striking ‘‘and subsection (c)(91)’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘subsection (c)(91), and subsection (c)(92)’’. 

13 (c) NUMBERING OF PARKWAY.—Section 

14 1105(e)(5)(C)(i) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor15 tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (Public Law 102–240; 109 

16 Stat. 598; 133 Stat. 3018) is amended by adding at the 

17 end the following: ‘‘The route referred to in subsection 

18 (c)(92) is designated as Interstate Route I–365.’’. 

19 (d) OPERATION OF VEHICLES.—Section 127(l)(3)(A) 

20 of title 23, United States Code, is amended— 

21 (1) in the matter preceding clause (i), in the 

22 first sentence, by striking ‘‘clauses (i) through (iv) 

23 of this subparagraph’’ and inserting ‘‘clauses (i) 

24 through (v)’’; and 

25 (2) by adding at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4706 IS

1 ‘‘(v) The Louie B. Nunn (Cum2 berland) Parkway (to be designated as a 

3 spur of Interstate Route 65) from the 

4 interchange with Interstate 65 in Barren 

5 County, Kentucky, east to the interchange 

6 with U.S. Highway 27 in Somerset, Ken7 tucky.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Filed 5/1/07 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2007 ND 57

Diana Hieb, Plaintiff, Appellee and Cross-Appellant

v.

Kim Hieb, Defendant, Appellant and Cross-Appellee

No. 20060240

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Karen L. McBride (argued) and David D. Schweigert (on brief), Bucklin, Klemin & McBride, P.O. Box 955, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-0955, for plaintiff, appellee and cross-appellant.

Irvin B. Nodland, Irvin B. Nodland, PC, P.O. Box 640, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-0640, for defendant, appellant, and cross-appellee.

Hieb v. Hieb

No. 20060240

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Kim Hieb appealed and Diana Hieb cross-appealed from a divorce judgment dividing the parties’ marital property, awarding Diana Hieb spousal support, and awarding Diana Hieb attorney fees and costs incurred for taking depositions.  Kim Hieb argues the district court erred in including certain property as part of the marital estate, awarding certain property to Diana Hieb, and failing to give him credit for some marital debts.  He also argues the court erred in computing his annual income and in awarding Diana Hieb attorney fees and costs for taking depositions.  Diana Hieb argues the court erred in excluding certain property from the marital estate and that the award of spousal support is inadequate in amount and duration.  We conclude the court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and the court did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorney fees and costs.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP91-229-029]

Take notice that on May 4, 2000, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company (Panhandle) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet to be effective June 1, 2000:

1st Rev Twenty-Third Rev Sheet No. 19

Panhandle states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the Commission's Letter received onMay 3, 2000 in Docket No. RP91-229-028 to correct the pagination. 

Panhandle states that copies of this filing are  being servd on all affected customers, applicable state regulatory agencies and parties to this proceeding.

Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission  in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to  the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-12264 Filed 5-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT
32.1






Statement Pursuant to
Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The
undersigned, Daniel Dror, CEO and Chairman of American International Industries,
Inc., a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required
by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the
following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2009.






The
undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all
respects, the financial condition of American International Industries, Inc. and
results of its operations.






Date:  May 11,
2009


Daniel
Dror


Chairman


/s/ Daniel
Dror
#### In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Michael Howard Berns, admitted on March 15, 1976, at a Term of the Appellate Division, First Department.

[708 NYS2d 278]

—Order of this Court entered on April 24, 1997 (see, 230 AD2d 366) recalled and vacated and Opinion Per Curiam filed therewith amended to vacate so much thereof as pertains to petitioner *nunc pro tunc;*and order of this Court entered on April 2, 1998 (see, 249 AD2d 21) recalled and vacated. No opinion. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.1072 Definitions.

Note:

The provisions applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.402 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-1910.402).

[[61 FR 31432](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31432), June 20, 1996]