alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-09-0074-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	APRIL 15, 2009

	______________________________

	JAMES LYNN CAMPBELL,

									Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS,

									Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 57,233-A; HON. HAL MINER, PRESIDING

			      _______________________________

					     Dismissal

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

	James Lynn Campbell appeals from his conviction of possession of a controlled substance.  By letter dated March 20, 2009, we informed appellant that it appeared his notice of appeal was untimely and he had ten days to provide us with any information that would be necessary to our determination of jurisdiction.  Appellant responded by informing us that the mailbox rule would be sufficient to establish that jurisdiction. 

	Sentence was imposed on November 18, 2008.  Appellant then had thirty days in which to file a motion for new trial.  Tex. R. App. P. 21.4(a).  His pro se motion for new trial  was not filed until December 31, 2008, and his pro se notice of appeal was filed on  March 3, 2009.  If appellant’s motion for new trial was untimely, then so was his notice of appeal. Tex. R. Civ. P. 26.2 (extending the time for filing a notice of appeal if a motion for new trial is filed).1

	The mailbox rule provides that any document sent to the proper clerk by first class postage in an envelope properly addressed and stamped is timely if deposited in the mail on or before the last day for filing and received by the clerk not more than ten days late.  Tex. R.  Civ. P. 5. 2  In civil cases, filing by an indigent inmate is deemed complete when given to prison authorities. Warner v. Glass, 135 S.W.3d 681, 684 (Tex. 2004).  This rule has been extended to indigent criminal defendants who are acting pro se.  See Villarreal v. State, 199 S.W.3d 30, 31 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 2006, no pet.).  Appellant’s certificate of mailing indicates that he gave the motion for new trial to prison authorities on December  18, 2008, thereby meeting the first portion of the mailbox rule.  However, the file-stamp date of the district clerk is December 31, 2008.  Appellant has not provided us with anything nor have we found anything in the record indicating that it was received by the clerk within ten days of December 18 as required by Rule 5.3  That being so, the mailbox rule is unavailing to appellant. 

	Accordingly, because the notice of appeal was untimely filed, we dismiss for want of jurisdiction.4  

							Brian Quinn 

						          Chief Justice

Do not publish.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SHAUN BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-4630 

[April 15, 2015]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara McCarthy, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 99-3203CF10A.

Shaun Brown, Chipley, pro se. 

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Affirmance is without prejudice to appellant filing a motion 

in accordance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) as outlined 

by the Florida Supreme Court, if he can do so in good faith. Williams v. 

State, 957 So. 2d 600, 604 (Fla. 2007); Wilkins v. State, 110 So. 3d 479, 

480 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). 

WARNER, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kevin J. Himmelhaver, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Kevin J. Himmelhaver
-----------------------------------------
Kevin J. Himmelhaver
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
  Officer and Secretary
November 13, 2003
#### § 1450.14 Suspending or termination collection action.

The suspension or termination of collection action shall be made in accordance with the standards set forth in part 104 of the Federal Claims Collection Standards (4 CFR part 104).
§ 48.110 Application. ( a ) *Required information.* Each applicant for a Certificate of Aircraft Registration issued under this part must submit all of the following information to the Registry: ( 1 ) Applicant's name and, for an applicant other than an individual, the name of the authorized representative applying for a Certificate of Aircraft Registration.
( 2 ) Applicant's physical address and, for an applicant other than an individual, the physical address of the authorized representative. If the applicant or authorized representative cannot receive mail at a physical address, then provide a mailing address.
( 3 ) Applicant's email address or, for applicants other than individuals, the email address of the authorized representative.
( 4 ) Applicant's telephone number(s) and, for an applicant other than an individual, the telephone number(s) of the authorized representative.
( 5 ) The aircraft manufacturer and model name.
( 6 ) For any standard remote identification unmanned aircraft, the serial number issued by the manufacturer of the unmanned aircraft in accordance with the design and production requirements of part 89 of this chapter. The serial number provided in this application must not be listed on more than one Certificate of Aircraft Registration at the same time.
( 7 ) For any unmanned aircraft equipped with a remote identification broadcast module, the serial number issued by the manufacturer of the remote identification broadcast module in accordance with the design and production requirements of part 89 of this chapter. An applicant may submit the serial number of more than one remote identification broadcast module as part of the application for aircraft registration under § 48.105. The serial number of a remote identification broadcast module provided in this application must not be listed on more than one Certificate of Aircraft Registration at the same time.
( 8 ) Other information as required by the Administrator.
( b ) *Provision of information.* The information identified in paragraph (a) of this section must be submitted to the Registry through the web-based small unmanned aircraft registration system in a form and manner prescribed by the Administrator.
( c ) *Issuance of Certificate of Aircraft Registration.* The FAA will issue a Certificate of Aircraft Registration upon completion of the application requirements provided in paragraph (a) of this section.
[Doc. No. FAA-2015-7396; Amdt. No. 48-1; 80 FR 78645, Dec. 16, 2015. Redesignated and amended by Doc. No. FAA-2019-1100; Amdt. No. 48-3, 86 FR 4504, Jan. 15, 2021]
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.1087 Liveboating.

Note:

The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.427 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-1910.427).

[[61 FR 31432](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31432), June 20, 1996]
# EUR-Lex - 31997F0827(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31997F0827(01)

**Council Act of 26 May 1997 drawing up a Convention on the service in the Member States of the European Union of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters **

*
Official Journal C 261 , 27/08/1997 P. 0001 - 0001 *

COUNCIL ACT of 26 May 1997 drawing up a Convention on the service in the Member States of the European Union of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (97/C 261/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article K.3 (2) (c) thereof,

Having examined the views of the European Parliament (1) following the consultation conducted by the Presidency in accordance with Article K.6 of the Treaty,

Considering that, for the purposes of achieving the objectives of the European Union, the Member States view the rules on cooperation in the service of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters as a matter of common interest falling within the scope of judicial cooperation in civil matters as laid down in Title VI of the Treaty,

HAVING DECIDED that the Convention, the text of which is attached, which has been signed today by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, is hereby drawn up,

RECOMMENDS that it be adopted by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

Done at Brussels, 26 May 1997.

For the Council

The President

W. SORGDRAGER

(1) Opinion delivered on 11 April 1997 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of UC HUB
GROUP,  INC.  for  the  quarter  ending January 31, 2006, I, Larry Wilcox, Chief
Executive  Officer  of  UC HUB GROUP, INC., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge  and  belief,  that:

     1.     Such  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending January
31,  2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.     The  information  contained  in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for  the  quarter  ending  January  31,  2006,  fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of UC HUB GROUP,
INC.

     Dated:  March 20, 2006.

                                     /s/  Larry Wilcox
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                     Larry Wilcox, Chief Executive Officer
                                     of UC HUB GROUP, INC.


<PAGE>
[Cite as Little Turtle Civic Assn., Inc. v. Columbus , 2021-Ohio-4655.]

{¶1} On November 30, 2021, a Special Master issued a Report and Recommendation in this public-records case. The Special Master recommends (1) denying, as moot, Requester’s claim for production of records, and (2) assessing costs equally between the parties. {¶2} Neither party has timely filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation, as permitted by R.C. 2743.75(F)(2). Pursuant t o R.C. 2743.75(F)(2), if neither party timely objects to a special master’s report an d recommendation, then this Court is required to “promptly issue a final order adopting the report and recommendation, unless it determines that there is an error of law or other defect evident on the face of the report and recommendation.” {¶3} The Court determines that there is no error of law or other def ect evident on the face of the Special Master’s Report and Recommendation of N ovember 30, 2021. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Court costs ar e assessed to Requester LITTLE TURTLE CIVIC ASSOCIATION, INC.

Requester

v.

CITY OF COLUMBUS (CITY COUNCIL, AND DEPT OF PUBLIC SERVICE)

Respondent Case No. 2021-00370PQ

Judge Patrick E. Sheeran

JUDGMENT ENTRYCase No. 2021-00370PQ -2- JUDGMENT ENTRY

and Respondent equally. The Clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

PATRICK E. SHEERAN Jud g e

Filed December 15, 2021 Sent to S.C. Reporter 1/21/22
CONTRACTS.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

October Term, 1898.]

Cox, Smith and Swing, JJ.

#### Augustus H. Moore v. Thos. Cassily, Exr.

Contract Whereby one Public Officer Agrees to Discharge Duties of Another is Void.

A contract by which one public officer agrees to perform the duties of another is against public policy and void.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.

The plaintiff and the testate of the defendant in error were respectively U. S. Inspector of Hulls of steam vessels and U. S., Inspector of Boilers of steam vessels for the district of Cincinnati from January 1880, till May 24, 1894, at the same annual salaries; and defendant being in bad health, requesting plaintiff to assist him, and plaintiff, during the entire period, did perform the greater part of the work connected with plaintiffs office. Suit was brought for this service in the sum of $10,339.30, or at the rate of $60 per month.

,5. *T. Crawford,*for plaintiff in error.

*Charles H. Stephens*and *Frank M. Cofipock,*contra.

Swing, J.

The action in the court of common pleas was to enforce an illegal contract. It was an action on the contract itself, and not an action for an accounting in equity, as was Brooks v. Martin, 2 Wall, 79, cited by plaintiff in error; nor does the case come under the principle decided in Horton v. Blinn, 39 O. S., 145, which was to recover money belonging to one in the hands of another. What right in an action on a *quantum meruit*Moore might have had it is not necessary for us to intimate. It is sufficient to say here that this action is to enforce the contract, which is admitted to be an illegal one, being against public policy.

The judgment below is affirmed.
§ 415.61 Issuance of payload determination. ( a ) The FAA issues a favorable payload determination unless it determines that launch of the proposed payload would jeopardize public health and safety, safety of property, U.S. national security or foreign policy interests, or international obligations of the United States. The FAA advises any person who has requested a payload review of its determination, in writing. The notice states the reasons for the determination in the event of an unfavorable determination.
( b ) Any person issued an unfavorable payload determination may respond to the reasons for the determination and request reconsideration.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act Rule 13a-14,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ProLink Holdings Corp.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to we, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on out most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 (d)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of the internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and
 (e)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or the other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Lawrence D. BainLawrence D. BainChief Executive Officer
§ 63.17 Tests: General procedure. ( a ) Tests prescribed by or under this part are given at times and places, and by persons, designated by the Administrator.
( b ) The minimum passing grade for each test is 70 percent.
# EUR-Lex - 31999D0714 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999D0714

**1999/714/EC: Commission Decision of 19 October 1999 establishing deadlines for the communication of the results of the 1999/2000 basic surveys on the structure of agricultural holdings to the Statistical Office of the European Communities (notified under document number C(1999) 3352) **

*
Official Journal L 282 , 05/11/1999 P. 0014 - 0015 *

COMMISSION DECISION

of 19 October 1999

establishing deadlines for the communication of the results of the 1999/2000 basic surveys on the structure of agricultural holdings to the Statistical Office of the European Communities

(notified under document number C(1999) 3352)

(1999/714/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 571/88 of 29 February 1988 on the organisation of Community surveys on the structure of agricultural holdings(1), as last amended by Commission Decision 98/377/EC(2), and in particular point 5 of Annex II thereto,

Whereas:

(1) Point 5 of Annex II to Regulation (EEC) No 571/88 requires time limits for the communication of individual survey data to the Statistical Office of the European Communities by the Communities by the Member States to be established in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 15 of the said Regulation and whereas the inform code to be used for the data transmission will be specified by the Statistical Office of the European Communities in agreement with the Member States;

(2) The importance of the structure survey results for the common agricultural policy and the growing demand for up-to-date data make it necessary to carry out the computer processing of the survey data and communication thereof to the Statistical Office of the European Communities as quickly as possible;

(3) The deadlines to be fixed for the communication of survey results to the Statistical Office of the European Communities must take into account the fact that the timetable for carrying out the survey work is different between Member States;

(4) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on agricultural statistics,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Member States shall communicate to the Statistical Office of the European Communities the individual data from the surveys on the structure of agricultural holdings carried out pursuant to Article 2(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 571/88, using a uniform code specified by the Statistical Office of the European Communities in agreement with the Member States.

Article 2

Member States shall communicate surveys results of the 1999/2000 structure surveys not later than the following deadlines:

>TABLE>

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 October 1999.

For the Commission

Pedro SOLBES MIRA

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 56, 2.3.1988, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 168, 13.6.1998, p. 29.
#### § 1690.103 Supersession.

None. These regulations are the first in a series of instructions issued by EEOC pursuant to its authority under Executive Order 12067.
§ 1404.15 Fees and charges of arbitrators. ( a ) *Fees to parties.* Prior to appointment, the parties should be aware of all significant aspects of the bases for an arbitrator's fees and expenses. Each arbitrator's biographical sketch shall include a statement of the bases for the arbitrator's fees and expenses, which shall conform to this part and the Code. The parties and the arbitrator shall be bound by the arbitrator's statement of the bases for fees and expenses in the biographical sketch for two years from the date of appointment unless they mutually agree otherwise in writing. Arbitrators listed on the Roster may change the bases for their fees and expenses for future appointments if they provide them in writing to OA at least 30 days in advance.
( b ) *Two or more addresses.* Arbitrators with more than one business address must bill the parties for expenses from the least expensive business address to the hearing site.
( c ) *Additional administrative fee.* In cases involving unusual amounts of time and expense relative to the pre-hearing and post-hearing administration of a particular case, the arbitrator may charge an administrative fee. This fee shall be disclosed to the parties as soon as it is foreseeable by the arbitrator.
( d ) *Fee disputes.* When a party believes the arbitrator has not followed the requirements of this Part, it should promptly notify OA, which may bring any complaint concerning the fees charged by an arbitrator to the attention of the Board for consideration. Complaints by arbitrators concerning non-payment of fees by a party may lead to the denial of services or other actions by OA.
#### BUCHANAN ET AL. v. UNITED STATES

[80 C. Cls. 850; 294 U. S. 723]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court March 18, 1935.