alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. MT00-6-000]

Take notice that on May 4, 2000, Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC (KMIGT) tendered for filing revisions to its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No 1-B, First Revised Sheet Nos 3, 55 and 56 and Second Revised Volume No. 1-D, First Revised Sheet Nos. 3, 48 and 49.

KMIGT states that on April 5, 2000, Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) closed on a transaction with ONEOK, Inc. (ONEOK) whereby various assets and entities were transferred to ONEOK, including all entities that were then marketing affiliates of KMIGT. As a result of the transaction, KMI states that it no longer has a marketing affiliate and is revising the tariff accordingly.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance                           ( print page 31156)                        with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-12219 Filed 5-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. S. B. Aultman, *Defendant in Error.*

A single motion to vacate a judgment by default and to allow tbe filing of pleas tendered with the motion, is properly denied when no showing is made for vacating the default judgment, especially where the pleas that are tendered are defective.

This case was decided by Division A.

*J. J. Lunsford*and *H. P.*Baya, for petition.

*199On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

Tlie court did not overlook any oí the contentions of the plaintiff in error. A single motion to vacate a judgment by default and to allow the filing of pleas tendered with the motion was denied by the trial court; and as no showing was made for vacating the default judgment the denial of the motion was proper, especially where the pleas are defective. See Garlington v. Priest, 13 Fla., 559; Benedict v. W. T. Hadlow, 52 Fla., 188, 42 South. Rep., 239, Hocker v. Forrester, 53 Fla. 392, 43 South. Rep., 241.

A rehearing is denied.

Whitfield, C. J., and Shackleford and Cockrell, J. J. concur;

Taylor, Hocker and Parkhill, J. J., concur in the opinion. .
Exhibit 32.1

INVERTED PARADIGMS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

The undersigned, Steven Weldon, in his capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of Inverted Paradigms Corporation do each
hereby certify that the Form 10-KSB of Inverted Paradigms Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
that the information contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inverted Paradigms Corporation.

This certification is given by the undersigned solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is subject to the knowledge standard contained therein.

Executed this 30th day of August, 2007.



/s/ Steven WeldonSteven WeldonChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
§ 18.62 Physical and mental examinations. ( a ) *Examination by notice* — ( 1 ) *In general.* A party may serve upon another party whose mental or physical condition is in controversy a notice to attend and submit to an examination by a suitably licensed or certified examiner.
( 2 ) *Contents of the notice.* The notice must specify: ( i ) The legal basis for the examination;
( ii ) The time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the examination, as well as the person or persons who will perform it; and
( iii ) How the reasonable transportation expenses were calculated.
( 3 ) *Service of notice.* Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the notice must be served no fewer than 30 days before the examination date.
( 4 ) *Objection.* The person to be examined must serve any objection to the notice no later than 14 days after the notice is served. The objection must be stated with particularity.
( b ) *Examination by motion.* Upon objection by the person to be examined the requesting party may file a motion to compel a physical or mental examination. The motion must include the elements required by paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( c ) *Examiner's report* — ( 1 ) *Delivery of the report.* The party who initiated the examination must deliver a complete copy of the examination report to the party examined no later than seven days after it receives the report, together with like reports of all earlier examinations of the same condition.
( 2 ) *Contents.* The examiner's report must be in writing and must set out in detail the examiner's findings, including diagnoses, conclusions, and the results of any tests.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Ron Moskovitz, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Amdocs Limited;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) [Not applicable]

     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: December 30, 2004

/s/  RON MOSKOVITZ
---------------------------------------------------------
Ron Moskovitz,
Chief Financial Officer,
Amdocs Management Limited
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4885 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4885

  To amend the CARES Act to provide that EIDL emergency grant advance 
          payments shall not be subject to certain reductions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 10, 2020

Mrs. Blackburn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the CARES Act to provide that EIDL emergency grant advance 
          payments shall not be subject to certain reductions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``EIDL Advance Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. EMERGENCY EIDL GRANT ADVANCE PAYMENTS.

    Section 1110(e)(6) of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9009(e)(6)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``If an applicant'' and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) In general.--Except as provided in 
                subparagraph (B), if an applicant''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Exception for paycheck protection program 
                loan forgiveness.--If an applicant that receives an 
                advance under this subsection transfers into, or is 
                approved for, the loan program under paragraph (36) of 
                section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
                636(a)), as added by section 1102(a) of this Act, the 
                advance amount may not be reduced from the loan 
                forgiveness amount for a loan for payroll costs made 
                under such paragraph (36), as determined under section 
                1106.''.
                                 <all>
```
Table 2 

SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS TEST DATA

Table : 2

Plant : Hanson Brick, Mineral Wells, TX

Location : Kiln #2 Exhaust

Operator : T. Armstrong, L. Whicher

Test Date : 17-Aug-10

Repetition : 4 5 6

STACK GAS

Temperature, F 242.4 245.5 245.5

Velocity, fps 42.55 42.79 42.11

Volume Flow, acfm 17059.3 17154.4 16880.5

 scfm 11729.7 11824.6 11573.5

 scfh 703780 709479 694411

Moisture, % 6.20% 5.55% 6.05%

CO2, % 2.50 2.50 2.50

O2, % 17.87 18.06 17.75

SAMPLE

Start Time, hrs:min 12:44 PM 2:33 PM 4:20 PM

Finish Time, hrs:min 1:47 PM 3:37 PM 5:23 PM

Sample Volume, scf 36.136 36.035 35.358

Isokinetic Ratio, % 98.32414 97.26243 97.50754

PARTICULATE

Front Half

Sample Weight, mg 73.22 47.18 69.90

Concentration, grains/scf 0.031265 0.020202 0.030504

Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 328.2262 226.2757 308.0315

Emissions, lbs/hr 3.144417 2.048249 3.026979

Emissions, gr/hr 1426.04 928.9112 1372.78

Beryllium

Sample Weight, ug (<0.012) (<0.012) (<0.012)

Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 (<0.00006) (<0.00006) (<0.00006)

Emissions, gr/hr (<0.00023) (<0.00024) (<0.00024)

Antimony

Sample Weight, ug (<0.005) (<0.005) (<0.005)

Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 (<0.000022) (<0.000024) (<0.000022)

Emissions, gr/hr (<0.000097) (<0.000098) (<0.000098)

Arsenic

Sample Weight, ug (<0.005) (<0.005) (<0.005)

Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 (<0.000022) (<0.000024) (<0.000022)

Emissions, gr/hr (<0.000097) (<0.000098) (<0.000098)

Cadmium

Sample Weight, ug (<0.005) (<0.005) (<0.005)

Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 (<0.000022) (<0.000024) (<0.000022)

Emissions, gr/hr (<0.000097) (<0.000098) (<0.000098)

Chromium

Sample Weight, ug 0.008 0.011 0.008

Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 3.59E-05 5.28E-05 3.53E-05

Emissions, gr/hr 0.000156 0.000217 0.000157

1
Table 2 

Cobalt

Sample Weight, ug (<0.005) (<0.005) (<0.005)

Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 (<0.000022) (<0.000024) (<0.000022)

Emissions, gr/hr (<0.000097) (<0.000098) (<0.000098)

Lead

Sample Weight, ug (<0.005) (<0.005) (<0.005)

Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 (<0.000022) (<0.000024) (<0.000022)

Emissions, gr/hr (<0.000097) (<0.000098) (<0.000098)

Manganese

Sample Weight, ug 0.024 0.092 0.036

Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 0.000108 0.000441 0.000159

Emissions, gr/hr 0.000467 0.001811 0.000707

Mercury

Sample Weight, ug 0.00423 0.00505 0.00517

Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 1.9E-05 2.42E-05 2.28E-05

Emissions, gr/hr 8.24E-05 9.94E-05 0.000102

Selenium

Sample Weight, ug 0.018 0.007 0.015

Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 8.07E-05 3.36E-05 6.61E-05

Emissions, gr/hr 0.000351 0.000138 0.000295

Nickel

Sample Weight, ug 0.005 0.013 0.009

Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 2.24E-05 6.23E-05 3.97E-05

Emissions, gr/hr 9.74E-05 0.000256 0.000177

2
§ 1903.9 Trade secrets. ( a ) Section 15 of the Act provides: “All information reported to or otherwise obtained by the Secretary or his representative in connection with any inspection or proceeding under this Act which contains or which might reveal a trade secret referred to in section 1905 of title 18 of the United States Code shall be considered confidential for the purpose of that section, except that such information may be disclosed to other officers or employees concerned with carrying out this Act or when relevant in any proceeding under this Act. In any such proceeding the Secretary, the Commission, or the court shall issue such orders as may be appropriate to protect the confidentiality of trade secrets.” Section 15 of the Act is considered a statute within the meaning of section 552(b)(3) of title 5 of the United States Code, which exempts from the disclosure requirements matters that are “specifically exempted from disclosure by statute.”
( b ) Section 1905 of title 18 of the United States Code provides: “Whoever, being an officer or employee of the United States or of any department or agency thereof, publishes, divulges, discloses, or makes known in any manner or to any extent not authorized by law any information coming to him in the course of his employment or official duties or by reason of any examination or investigation made by, or return, report or record made to or filed with, such department or agency or officer or employee thereof, which information concerns or relates to the trade secrets, processes, operations, style of work, or apparatus, or to the identity, confidential statistical data, amount or source of any income, profits, losses, or expenditures of any person, firm, partnership, corporation, or association; or permits any income return or copy thereof or any book containing any abstract or particulars thereof to be seen or examined by any person except as provided by law; shall be fined not more than $1,000, or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both; and shall be removed from office or employment.”
( c ) At the commencement of an inspection, the employer may identify areas in the establishment which contain or which might reveal a trade secret. If the Compliance Safety and Health Officer has no clear reason to question such identification, information obtained in such areas, including all negatives and prints of photographs, and environmental samples, shall be labeled “confidential—trade secret” and shall not be disclosed except in accordance with the provisions of section 15 of the Act.
( d ) Upon the request of an employer, any authorized representative of employees under § 1903.8 in an area containing trade secrets shall be an employee in that area or an employee authorized by the employer to enter that area. Where there is no such representative or employee, the Compliance Safety and Health Officer shall consult with a reasonable number of employees who work in that area concerning matters of safety and health.
#### § 1650.401 Purpose and regulatory procedures for the collection of debts by administrative wage garnishment.

The Commission hereby adopts by cross-reference the administrative wage garnishment regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury at 31 CFR 285.11. The general standards and procedures governing the collection, compromise, termination, and referral to the Department of Justice of claims for money and property that are prescribed in the regulations issued jointly by the Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney General of the United States, the Federal Claims Collection Standards (31 CFR Parts 900-904), apply to the administrative collection activities of the EEOC. The authority to collect debts by administrative wage garnishment is delegated to the CFO.
#### McTIGUE et v McTIGUE et

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9972.

Decided Mar 11, 1929

Dunlap, Stephens & Stephens and John J Moore, all of Cleveland, for Plaintiffs in error.

Vickery and Vickery, Cleveland, for defendants in error.

Judges WILLIAMS & RICHARDS of the Sixth Dist sitting.

BY THE COURT.

We think, construing the terms of the certificate fairly, that these provisions became binding upon the parties and rendered effective and applicable to the beneficiary certificate the amendment which was made to the by-laws. John J. McTigue, after the amendment was adopted, not having made any further disposition of the proceeds of the certificate or designation of beneficiary, the amendment became operative and by its terms the amount is made payable to the children.

For this reason the judgment should be affirmed.

Williams and Richards, JJ, concur. Lloyd, J, not participating.
#### FRANKS v. BLAIR REALTY CO.

Ohio Supreme Court.

No. 21088.

Decided Dec. 12, 1928.

JONES, J.

REAL ESTATE.

(510 B 2e) On February 18, 1926, the owner of real estate listed his property with a broker and agreed in writing to pay the broker for finding a purchaser a certain commission if the property were sold within the period of five days. At the expiration period owner orally promised to extend indefinitely the time of performance. In reliance upon *13such, oral promise the broker continued its efforts to find a purchaser. Meanwhile, the owner, in disregard of his oral promise, proceeded on his own behalf and, by employing another broker at a reduced commission, consummated a sale by exchange of properties with a purchaser with whom the first broker was also negotiating: Held:

The time for performance was of the essence of the written contract. The subsequent oral agreement was a new contract and, by substituting a new time for performance, varied an essential term of the written contract and was invalid and unenforceable by reason of the provisions of the Statute of Frauds relating to the payment of real estate commissions. (Section 8621, General Code).

During the existence of the extended time for performance and while the transaction remained unexecuted, such oral promise being invalid, either party could decline to carry out its terms either in the finding of a purchaser or for the payment of a commission.

Since the owner did not complete his contract with the broker and accept the latter’s services in negotiating a sale, but secured another broker who consummated it, the owner is not estopped from asserting the invalidity of his oral promise.

Marshall, C. J., Day, Allen, Kinkade, Robinson and Matthias, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Kellwood
Company and Subsidiaries Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at January 31,
2000, and from the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings and Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended January 31, 2000,
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>         1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                          54,501
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  339,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,142
<INVENTORY>                                    394,988
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               824,278
<PP&E>                                         253,524
<DEPRECIATION>                                 149,850
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,097,853
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          248,158
<BONDS>                                        346,479
<COMMON>                                       166,312
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     279,558
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,097,853
<SALES>                                      1,565,261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,565,261
<CGS>                                        1,237,683
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,237,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               236,324
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,119
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,654
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 68,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             41,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.48


</TABLE>
§ 1912a.4 Meetings. ( a ) The Committee shall hold no fewer than two meetings during each calendar year and, it is contemplated that no more than six meetings a year will be held. No meeting shall be held except at the call of or with the advance approval of: ( 1 ) The Secretary of Labor, or his duly authorized representative; or
( 2 ) The Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, or his duly authorized representative.
( b ) An agenda shall be approved in advance by the person calling or approving the meeting, in consultation with the Chairman or his delegate. No particular form for the agenda is prescribed. Members of the Committee may propose items for the agenda to the Chairman.