alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1410.12 Specific exemptions.

With regard to Agency Internal Personnel Records and Arbitrator Personal Data Files, separately described in the system notices, such records will be exempted from section (d) of the Act as follows:

Investigatory material maintained solely for the purposes of determining an individual's qualification, eligibility, or suitability for employment in the Federal civilian service, Federal contracts, or access to classified information, but only to the extent that disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of the source who furnished information to the Government under an express promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence, or prior to September 27, 1975, under an implied promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence.

In order to obtain accurate information pertaining to employee or arbitrator eligibility, the nondisclosure of the identity of such a confidential source is essential.
Order entered July 25, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00059-CR

WILLIE DESHUN WADE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17-75793-R

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s July 23, 2018 second motion to extend the time to file 

appellant’s brief. We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or 

before August 13, 2018. If appellant’s brief is not filed by August 13, 2018, this appeal may be 

abated for the trial court to make findings in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 38.8.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
§ 1918.23 Jacob's ladders. ( a ) Jacob's ladders shall be of the double rung or flat tread type. They shall be well maintained and properly secured.
( b ) A Jacob's ladder shall either hang without slack from its lashings or be pulled up entirely.
( c ) When a Jacob's ladder is used as the means of access to a barge being worked, spacers (bumpers) shall be hung between the vessel, barge, or other structure to which the barge is tied alongside, or other equally effective means shall be provided to prevent damage to the bottom rungs of the ladder.
( d ) When a Jacob's ladder is being used so that there is a danger of an employee falling or being crushed between the vessel, barge, or other structure (pier), suitable protection shall be provided.
§ 1952.17 Indiana. ( a ) The Indiana State plan received initial approval on March 6, 1974.
( b ) The Indiana State plan received final approval on September 26, 1986.
( c ) Under the terms of the 1978 Court Order in *AFL-CIO* v. *Marshall,* compliance staffing levels (benchmarks) necessary for a “fully effective” enforcement program were required to be established for each State operating an approved State plan. In September 1984 Indiana, in conjunction with OSHA, completed a reassessment of the levels initially established in 1980 and proposed revised compliance staffing benchmarks of 47 safety and 23 health compliance officers. After opportunity for public comment and service on the AFL-CIO, the Assistant Secretary approved these revised staffing requirements on January 17, 1986.
( d ) The plan covers all private-sector employers and employees, with several notable exceptions, as well as State and local government employers and employees, within the State. For current information on these exceptions and for additional details about the plan, please visit *http://www.osha.gov/dcsp/osp/stateprogs/indiana.html .*
§ 1910.138 Hand protection. ( a ) *General requirements.* Employers shall select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands are exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasions; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes.
( b ) *Selection.* Employers shall base the selection of the appropriate hand protection on an evaluation of the performance characteristics of the hand protection relative to the task(s) to be performed, conditions present, duration of use, and the hazards and potential hazards identified.
[59 FR 16362, Apr. 6, 1994; 59 FR 33911, July 1, 1994]
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Link Plus Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Jones, Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


  /s/ ROBERT L. JONES, JR.
----------------------------------------------
Robert L. Jones, Jr., Chief Executive Officer
§ 1627.11 Petitions for recordkeeping exceptions. ( a ) *Submission of petitions for relief.* Each employer, employment agency, or labor organization who for good cause wishes to maintain records in a manner other than required in this part, or to be relieved of preserving certain records for the period or periods prescribed in this part, may submit in writing a petition to the Commission requesting such relief setting forth the reasons therefor and proposing alternative recordkeeping or record-retention procedures.
( b ) *Action on petitions.* If, no review of the petition and after completion of any necessary or appropriate investigation supplementary thereto, the Commission shall find that the alternative procedure proposed, if granted, will not hamper or interfere with the enforcement of the Act, and will be of equivalent usefulness in its enforcement, the Commission may grant the petition subject to such conditions as it may determine appropriate and subject to revocation. Whenever any relief granted to any person is sought to be revoked for failure to comply with the conditions of the Commission, that person shall be notified in writing of the facts constituting such failure and afforded an opportunity to achieve or demonstrate compliance.
( c ) *Compliance after submission of petitions.* The submission of a petition or any delay of the Commission in acting upon such petition shall not relieve any employer, employment agency, or labor organization from any obligations to comply with this part. However, the Commission shall give notice of the denial of any petition with due promptness.
§ 15.111 If the administrative claim is approved, how is the award paid? ( a ) Any award, compromise, or settlement in the amount of $2,500 or less made pursuant to this section shall be paid by the Secretary of Labor out of appropriations available to the Department.
( b ) Payment of an award, compromise, or settlement in an amount in excess of $2,500 made pursuant to this subpart shall be made in accordance with 28 CFR 14.10.
( c ) An award, compromise or settlement of a claim under 28 U.S.C. 2672 and this subpart in excess of $25,000 may be effected only with the prior written approval of the Attorney General or his designee. For the purpose of this subpart, a principal claim and any derivative or subrogated claim shall be treated as a single claim.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 0912 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM035AD

SB - 328 - 76 -486, R2 --- 3/11/10 SB - 328 - 76 -486, R1 --- 3/2/10 SB - 328 - 76 -486 --- 7/15/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK>0000060549
<NAME>LOUISVILLE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,752,016
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      1,154
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         285,027
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        66,440
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,104,637
<COMMON>                                       424,334<F1>
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                           50<F2>
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            247,462
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 671,846
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     95,328
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           626,800
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 710,663
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,104,637
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      850,056
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            56,307
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     658,226
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     714,533
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        135,523
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                            (21,081)<F3>
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 114,442
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        36,322
<NET-INCOME>                                    78,120
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      4,568
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   73,552
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        85,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       34,267
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         225,711
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes common stock expense of $836.
<F2>Represents unrealized gain/loss on marketable securities, net of taxes.
<F3>Includes $32,072 Merger costs to achieve.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Gregory T. Lucier, Chief Executive Officer of Invitrogen Corporation (the
Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 28, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Gregory T. Lucier  
|                      |  |  |  | Gregory T. Lucier      
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Invitrogen and will be retained by Invitrogen and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant application, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Research Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         June 15-16, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 am to 5 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         The Governor's House Hotel, Cabinet Room, 1615 Rhode Island Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Paula S. Strickland, Phd, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID, NIH, Room 2156, 6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7610, Bethesda, MD 20892-7610, 301-496-2550.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 10, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-12534 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 1902.17 The proceeding.

Whenever as a result of (a) an initial examination of a plan, or (b) written or oral comments concerning a plan submitted in an informal rulemaking proceeding concerning a proposed approval of a plan or any subject or issue concerning the plan, the Assistant Secretary proposes to reject a plan or rejection remains in issue for any reason, he shall follow the procedures prescribed in the remaining sections of this subpart.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 6, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50517 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROLANDO CASTILLO-CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:05-CR-881-ALL

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Rolando CastilloCastillo raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
§ 1917.13 Slinging. ( a ) Drafts shall be safely slung before being hoisted. Loose dunnage or debris hanging or protruding from loads shall be removed.
( b ) Bales of cotton, wool, cork, wood pulp, gunny bags or similar articles shall be hoisted only by straps strong enough to support the weight of the bale. At least two hooks, each in a separate strap, shall be used.
( c ) Unitized loads bound by bands or straps may be hoisted by the banding or strapping only if the banding or strapping is suitable for hoisting and is strong enough to support the weight of the load.
( d ) Additional means of hoisting shall be employed to ensure safe lifting of unitized loads having damaged banding or strapping.
( e ) Case hooks shall be used only with cases designed to be hoisted by these hooks.
( f ) Loads requiring continuous manual guidance during handling shall be guided by guide ropes (tag lines) that are long enough to control the load.
( g ) Intermodal containers shall be handled in accordance with § 1917.71(f).
( h ) The employer shall require employees to stay clear of the area beneath overhead drafts or descending lifting gear.
( i ) Employees shall not be permitted to ride the hook or the load.
[48 FR 30909, July 5, 1983, as amended at 62 FR 40197, July 25, 1997]
#### AUSTIN CO v BROWN

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21370.

Decided June 5, 1929

Syllabus by

MARSHALL, CJ

EMPLOYER & EMPLOYE

(250 W3) The widow of a workman, injured in the course of the employment and dying, as a result of such injuries, is not excluded from the presumption of being wholly dependent under Section 1465-82 GC, by the fact that the marriage was contracted after the date of the injury.

Paragraph (a) of sub-section 5 of Section 1465-82 is not limited by the later provisions of that section.

To entitle a widow to death benefits it is only necessary to prove that she was lawfully married to the deceased employee and was living with him at the time of his death, that he was injured in the course of his employment, that his compensation or disability was continuous to the time of his death, and that the death w,as the result of the original injury.

Kinkade, Day and Allen, JJ, concur. Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ, concur in propositions one and two of the syllabus and in the judgment.
§ 91.1031 Pilot in command or second in command: Designation required. ( a ) Each program manager must designate a— ( 1 ) Pilot in command for each program flight; and
( 2 ) Second in command for each program flight requiring two pilots.
( b ) The pilot in command, as designated by the program manager, must remain the pilot in command at all times during that flight.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, John P. Crowley,certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of FairPoint Communications, Inc.(the “Company”);

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,the periods presented in this annual report;

4.                 The Company’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) rule 13a 3⁄415(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have:

(i)            designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this annual report was being prepared;

(ii)        evaluated theeffectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annualreport; and

(iii)    disclosed in this report anychange in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.                 The Company’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’sauditors and the audit committee of Company’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent function):

(i)            all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adverselyaffect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(ii)        any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 13,2006

| /s/ John P. Crowley        |     |
|----------------------------|----------|
| John P. Crowley            | * * |
| *Chief  Financial Officer* | * * |

 

----
§ 1917.126 River banks. ( a ) This section applies to temporary installations or temporary operations near a river bank.
( b ) Where working surfaces at river banks slope so steeply that an employee could slip or fall into the water, the outer perimeter of the working surface shall be protected by posting or other portable protection such as roping off. In these situations, employees must wear a personal flotation device meeting the requirements of § 1917.95(b).
[48 FR 30909, July 5, 1983, as amended at 62 FR 40201, July 25, 1997]