alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | 1. | Lexicon’s      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and to      which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic      Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Lexicon.                                                                                                                                                  |

| By:    | /s/      Arthur T. Sands                  |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | Arthur      T. Sands, M.D., Ph.D.         |
|   | President      and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |

| By:    | /s/      James F. Tessmer                  |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | James      F. Tessmer                      |
|   | Vice      President, Finance andAccounting |
###### Editorial Note on Part 380

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 380 appear at 84 FR 15940, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 380.1 Applicability.

This part applies to Public Charter air transportation of passengers in interstate or foreign air transportation, whether furnished by direct air carriers or Public Charter operators. This part also relieves such charter operators from various provisions of subtitle VII of Title 49 of the United States Code (statute), for the purpose of enabling them to provide Public Charters utilizing aircraft chartered from such direct air carriers. It also declines jurisdiction over foreign Public Charter operators operating foreign-originating Public Charters.

[Docket No. OST-97-2356, 63 FR 28241, May 22, 1998, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15940, Apr. 16, 2019]
#### Isaac Boasburg *v.*Timothy J. Cronan and ano.

*(Superior Court of Buffalo,*

*Trial Term,*

*Filed June 12, 1889.)*

Benevolent societies—Beneficiary—Rights of creditors as against.

When bv agreement the moneys secured by a beneficiary certificate were made* payable to the beneficiary for the express purpose of paying creditors, the beneficiary is a mere trustee to effectuate that purpose, and has no claim on the fund as against the creditors, for whose benefit the fund was created. - ;

*Ullman & Ullman,*for pl’ff; *Andrus & Joyce,*fordef’ts.

*931Titus, J.

This action, in form, is against Timothy J. Cronan and Neptune Lodge No. 57, Empire Order of Mutual Aid, but is, in fact, against Timothy J. Cronan, the beneficiary named in the certificate. ■ The defendant Empire Order of Mutual ‘ Aid does not defend nor claim exemption from the payment of the money, $1,000, to the person designated in the certificate, but comes into court, and by its treasurer disavows any claim to the fund, and is ready and willing to pay to whomsoever the court determines is entitled to it.

The claim of the plaintiff is that the fund in the hands of the defendant Cronan is impressed with a trust to pay the plaintiff and other creditors of Daniel Cronan; that the money was made payable to Timothy J. Cronan by the deceased, for the express purpose, and with the understanding of the defendant Cronan that it should be applied by him in the payment of his debts and funeral expenses. From the evidence in the case, I am satisfied that such was the agreement and intent with which Timothy J. Cronan was made the payee in the beneficiary certificate. Such being the case equity will enforce the trust, and charge the fund in the hands of the defendant Cronan, with the payment of the debts and funeral expenses of the deceased. The authorities cited by the defendant do not militate against this proposition, as the facts in this case take it out of the rule invoked by the defendant. They in substance lay down the rule that monies received by a beneficiary certificate are not assets of the deceased, and not subject to the payment of his debts as against the beneficiary. In this case, the deceased has by agreement made the fund payable to the defendant Cronan, for the express purpose of paying creditors; the defendant therefore is a mere trustee to effectuate that purpose, and has no claim on the fund as against the plaintiff and those creditors who were mentioned, and for whose benefit the fund was created.

The facts although meagre, are sufficient to establish the plaintiff’s right to recover. Judgment is ordered for the amount claimed by the plaintiff, with interest and costs, and the Empire Order of Mutual Aid is directed to pay the plaintiff that amount, and the balance to the defendant Cronan to pay debts and funeral expenses.
Exhibit 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  23 LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended
June  30,  2002,  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark E.  Larson,
Chief  Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management  XXI,  Inc.,  the
Managing  Member of the Company, certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


                              /s/ Mark E Larson
                                  Mark E. Larson
                                  Chief Financial Officer of
                                  AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.,
                                  the Managing Member
                                  August 6, 2002
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric Hemphill, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 517]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered March 31, 1997, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to *311withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Joy, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Networking and InformationTechnology Research and Development : supplement to the President�s budget forFY**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc Number:PREX 23.14/3-2:
Item Number:0857-P-09 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000930489
 
March 13, 2018
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 198 (Thursday, October 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 63701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26399]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7640]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Anglo-Saxon Hoard: Gold From England's Dark Ages''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Anglo-Saxon Hoard: Gold From England's 
Dark Ages,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, from on or about 
October 29, 2011, until on or about March 4, 2012, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: October 6, 2011.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-26399 Filed 10-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
#### § 437.39 Flight rules.

An applicant must provide flight rules as required by § 437.71.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Royce William Tawater

No. 06-15-00142-CR

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, 

Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the 

relief sought. Therefore, we deny the petition.

RENDERED AUGUST 25, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
# EUR-Lex - 32000D0062 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000D0062

**2000/62/EC: Commission Decision of 21 December 1999 approving the plan presented by Portugal for the surveillance of African swine fever (notified under document number C(1999) 4783) (Text with EEA relevance) (Only the Portuguese text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 022 , 27/01/2000 P. 0065 - 0065 *

COMMISSION DECISION

of 21 December 1999

approving the plan presented by Portugal for the surveillance of African swine fever

(notified under document number C(1999) 4783)

(Only the Portuguese text is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2000/62/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market(1), as last amended by Council Directive 92/118/EEC(2), and, in particular, Article 10(4) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) By Commission Decision 1999/789/EC(3), Portugal was requested to submit the Commission a plan for the surveillance of African swine fever in the regions Alentejo and Algarve.

(2) The plan submitted by Portugal provides for additional suitable measures to prevent the spread of African swine fever.

(3) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The plan submitted by Portugal for the surveillance of African swine fever is hereby approved.

Article 2

Portugal shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions for implementing the plan referred to in Article 1.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Portuguese Republic.

Done at Brussels, 21 December 1999.

For the Commission

David BYRNE

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 29.

(2) OJ L 62, 15.3.1993, p. 49.

(3) OJ L 310, 4.12.1999, p. 71.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          11,578
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,018
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    164,803
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        297,704
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (2,330)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 493,254
<DEPOSITS>                                     271,804
<SHORT-TERM>                                   130,537
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,179
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 493,254
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,293
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,545
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    37
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                22,201
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,988
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,466
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,735
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      180
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,187
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 13,718
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    593
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         593
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       374
<EPS-BASIC>                                        000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      000
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.99
<LOANS-NON>                                        188
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   750
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,500
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,166
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       50
<RECOVERIES>                                        34
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,330
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,330
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
§ 1910.162 Fixed extinguishing systems, gaseous agent. ( a ) *Scope and application* — ( 1 ) *Scope.* This section applies to all fixed extinguishing systems, using a gas as the extinguishing agent, installed to meet a particular OSHA standard. These systems shall also comply with § 1910.160. In some cases, the gas may be in a liquid state during storage.
( 2 ) *Application.* The requirements of paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(4) through (b)(6) shall apply only to total flooding systems.
( b ) *Specific requirements.* ( 1 ) Agents used for initial supply and replenishment shall be of the type approved for the system's application. Carbon dioxide obtained by dry ice conversion to liquid is not acceptable unless it is processed to remove excess water and oil.
( 2 ) Except during overhaul, the employer shall assure that the designed concentration of gaseous agents is maintained until the fire has been extinguished or is under control.
( 3 ) The employer shall assure that employees are not exposed to toxic levels of gaseous agent or its decomposition products.
( 4 ) The employer shall assure that the designed extinguishing concentration is reached within 30 seconds of initial discharge except for Halon systems which must achieve design concentration within 10 seconds.
( 5 ) The employer shall provide a distinctive pre-discharge employee alarm capable of being perceived above ambient light or noise levels when agent design concentrations exceed the maximum safe level for employee exposure. A pre-discharge employee alarm for alerting employees before system discharge shall be provided on Halon 1211 and carbon dioxide systems with a design concentration of 4 percent or greater and for Halon 1301 systems with a design concentration of 10 percent or greater. The pre-discharge employee alarm shall provide employees time to safely exit the discharge area prior to system discharge.
( 6 ) ( i ) Where egress from an area cannot be accomplished within one minute, the employer shall not use Halon 1301 in concentrations greater than 7 percent.
( ii ) Where egress takes greater than 30 seconds but less than one minute, the employer shall not use Halon 1301 in a concentration greater than 10 percent.
( iii ) Halon 1301 concentrations greater than 10 percent are only permitted in areas not normally occupied by employees provided that any employee in the area can escape within 30 seconds. The employer shall assure that no unprotected employees enter the area during agent discharge.
[45 FR 60712, Sept. 12, 1980; 46 FR 24557, May 1, 1981]
ex10-1.htm








Exhibit 10.1

[on Comtex News Network, Inc. letterhead]





















September 16, 2009





Dr. C.W. Gilluly

415 First Street, SE

Washington, DC 20003-1827





Dear C.W.:





I am pleased to inform you the Compensation Committee has decided to renew your agreement through June 30, 2010.  The effective date will be July 1, 2009 and as a condition of this renewal we are increasing your compensation from $3,250 per month to $5,000 per month.  Additionally, you will be eligible to participate in
any employee benefit plans sponsored by the Company for the benefit of its employees upon the same terms and conditions as other employees of the Company.





Thanks for your continued support of the business and I look forward to another productive year working together.





Sincerely,













/s/Chip Brian

CEO and President
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Terry G. Roussel and Gary W. Nielson, do eachhereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of hisknowledge, the Quarterly Report of Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC on Form 10-Qfor the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations ofCornerstone Realty Fund, LLC.

 
|                   |   | /s/ TERRY G. ROUSSEL                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: November 5, 2004 |   | Terry G. Roussel                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|                   |   | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive  Officer) of  Cornerstone Ventures, Inc., Managing Member of  Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC, the Managing Member of  Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC |

 

 
|                   |   | /s/  GARY W. NIELSON                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: November 5, 2004 |   | Gary W. Nielson                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|                   |   | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial  Officer) of  Cornerstone Ventures, Inc., Managing Member of  Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC, the Managing Member of  Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC |

 

----
#### Alfred Roe and Ano., as Executors, etc., App’lts, *v.*Caroline A. Strong *et al.,*Resp’ts.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,*

*Filed June 28, 1889.)*

Judgment—Decision op court op appeals controlling.

Where, as the result of a new trial, the plaintiffs’ complaint is dismissed in obedience to the requirement of a decision of the court of appeals on an appeal from a judgment on the former trial, and the case made by the plaintiff ou appeal from such dismissal is no better than it was when it was in the court of appeals, that decision is controlling until the latter court determines otherwise.

Appeal from a judgment rendered at special term in an action tried without a jury, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint.

*Roe & MacMin,*for app’lts; *Strong & Spear,*for resp’ts.

Dykman, J.

This action was brought to procure the removal of a bridge which the plaintiff claimed was erected upon his property, and it has been twice tried. The first trial resulted in a dismissal of the complaint, and that judgment was reversed by the general term and a new trial was granted.

The second trial was before a judge without a jury, and he rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff, which was affirmed by the general term and reversed by the court of appeals, and another new trial ordered. 12 N. T. State Eep., 56.

Such new trial has now been had, and it resulted in a dismissal of the complaint in obedience to the requirement of the decision of the court of appeals as that decision was understood by the trial judge.

So far as we can see, the case made by the plaintiff is no better than it was when it was in the court of appeals, and, in our view, that decision is yet controlling, and must be so unless the court of appeals shall determine otherwise.

The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

All concur.
#### § 1915.90 Safety color code for marking physical hazards.

The requirements applicable to shipyard employment under this section are identical to the requirements set forth at 29 CFR 1910.144 of this chapter.