alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

### Graham, Vanessa

From: Tracy Walters <twalters@mdaqmd.ca.gov>

Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 4:25 PM

To: Graham, Vanessa; Tong, Stanley

Cc: Alan De Salvio; Bret Banks

Subject: AVAQMD Rule 1130 - Graphic Arts

Good Afternoon,

The Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District would like to provide the following information in response to the

question regarding section (G)

– Emission Reduction Credits.

This section was reworded in response to a comment from EPA which inadvertently increased the ERC calculation limit

from 300 g/l to the limits in section (C)(2)(a) Table 3. This section will be amended the next time the rule is opened to

correct the wording, but at this time, there is no reason that this provision will cause the release of additional air

contaminants or create any adverse environmental impacts.

 The AVAQMD has no flexographic printing operations in the District. The District had one permit for a

flexographic printing press that became inactive in 1998.

 No facility has ever used this ERC provision, and the AVAQMD cannot foresee any opportunity for a facility to

use this provision in the future.

The total TOG & VOC emissions from printing sources in the AVAQMD from 2013 totaled 3.7 tons. These sources were

Deluxe Manufacturing and Antelope Valley Press, a check printing operation and newspaper printer, respectively.

Please feel free to contact me with any further questions.

Thank you,

Tracy Walters, R.E.H.S.

Lead Air Quality Planner

(760) 245

‐ 1661 x6122

www.mdaqmd.ca.gov
#### § 1919.7 Voluntary amendment or termination of accreditation.

The accreditation of any person may be voluntarily amended or terminated upon written request filed with the Assistant Secretary.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21

                          PARENTS AND SUBSIDIARIES

The Company and its subsidiaries* as of March 6, 2004 are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             State (Country) of        Percentage of Voting
Name of Company                              Incorporation             Securities Owned
---------------                              ------------------        --------------------
<S>                                          <C>                       <C>
Kellwood Company                             Delaware                  Parent
American Recreation Products, Inc.           Delaware                  100%
Kellwood Asia Limited                        Hong Kong                 100%
Smart Shirts Limited                         Hong Kong                 100%
South Asia Garment Limited                   Hong Kong                 100%
Kellwood Trading, Ltd.                       Hong Kong                 100%
KWD Holdings, Inc.                           Delaware                  100%
Robert Scott & David Brooks
   Outlet Stores, Inc.                       Delaware                  100%
Tri-W Corporation                            North Carolina            100%
Halmode Apparel, Inc.                        Delaware                  100%
Koret of California, Inc.                    California                100%
Koret Outlet Stores, Inc.                    Delaware                  100%
Biflex International, Inc.                   New York                  100%
Kellwood Financial Resources, Inc.           Tennessee                 100%
Kellwood Shared Services, Inc.               Delaware                  100%
Dorby Frocks, Ltd.                           New York                  100%
Gerber Childrenswear, Inc.                   Delaware                  100%
Briggs New York, Inc.                        Delaware                  100%
Phat Fashions, LLC                           New York                  100%

<FN>
* Some of the above subsidiaries also have subsidiaries which are not listed
because, in the aggregate, they are not considered to be significant.
</TABLE>

                                     59
[No. 20345-0-III.

Division Three.

November 5, 2002.]

#### Robert Critchlow, *Appellant,*v. Jamie Winterroth, et al., *Defendants,*Pamela Bean, et al., *Respondents.*Robert W. Critchlow, *Appellant,*v. Sylvia Abbott, et al., *Defendants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, Nos. 99-2-03277-7 and 00-2-01417-6, James M. Murphy and Salvatore F. Cozza, JJ., entered April 12, 2000 and June 15, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, C.J., concurred in by Sweeney and Kurtz, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               6,941
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       21,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (11,114)
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    29,741
<PP&E>                                             108,720
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (142,032)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     166,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              261,351
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               111
<OTHER-SE>                                         (95,863)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       166,861
<SALES>                                             71,853
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    71,853
<CGS>                                               79,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       79,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (123)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  13,031
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (21,015)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            49
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (21,064)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (21,064)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (1.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.90)


</TABLE>
§ 1910.5 Applicability of standards. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the standards contained in this Part shall apply with respect to employments performed in a workplace in a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Wake Island, Outer Continental Shelf lands defined in the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, and Johnston Island.
( b ) None of the standards in this part shall apply to working conditions of employees with respect to which Federal agencies other than the Department of Labor, or State agencies acting under section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2021), exercise statutory authority to prescribe or enforce standards or regulations affecting occupational safety or health.
( c ) ( 1 ) If a particular standard is specifically applicable to a condition, practice, means, method, operation, or process, it shall prevail over any different general standard which might otherwise be applicable to the same condition, practice, means, method, operation, or process. For example, § 1915.23(c)(3) of this title prescribes personal protective equipment for certain ship repairmen working in specified areas. Such a standard shall apply, and shall not be deemed modified nor superseded by any different general standard whose provisions might otherwise be applicable, to the ship repairmen working in the areas specified in § 1915.23(c)(3).
( 2 ) On the other hand, any standard shall apply according to its terms to any employment and place of employment in any industry, even though particular standards are also prescribed for the industry, as in subpart B or subpart R of this part, to the extent that none of such particular standards applies. To illustrate, the general standard regarding noise exposure in § 1910.95 applies to employments and places of employment in pulp, paper, and paperboard mills covered by § 1910.261.
( d ) In the event a standard protects on its face a class of persons larger than employees, the standard shall be applicable under this part only to employees and their employment and places of employment.
( e ) [Reserved]
( f ) An employer who is in compliance with any standard in this part shall be deemed to be in compliance with the requirement of section 5(a)(1) of the Act, but only to the extent of the condition, practice, means, method, operation, or process covered by the standard.
[39 FR 23502, June 27, 1974, as amended at 58 FR 35308, June 30, 1993; 85 FR 8732, Feb. 18, 2020]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1904

#### Editorial Note:

At 82 FR 20548, May 3, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-21, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration removed all amendments to part 1904 published at 81 FR 91792, Dec. 19, 2016.

#### § 1904.44 Retention and updating of old forms.

You must save your copies of the OSHA 200 and 101 forms for five years following the year to which they relate and continue to provide access to the data as though these forms were the OSHA 300 and 301 forms. You are not required to update your old 200 and 101 forms.
# EUR-Lex - 32000D0051 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000D0051

**2000/51/EC: Commission Decision of 17 December 1999 amending Decision 92/452/EEC establishing lists of embryo collection teams and embryo production teams approved in third countries for export of bovine embryos to the Community (notified under document number C(1999) 4535) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 019 , 25/01/2000 P. 0054 - 0061 *

COMMISSION DECISION

of 17 December 1999

amending Decision 92/452/EEC establishing lists of embryo collection teams and embryo production teams approved in third countries for export of bovine embryos to the Community

(notified under document number C(1999) 4535)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2000/51/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 89/556/EEC of 25 September 1989 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in and imports from third countries of embryos of domestic animals of the bovine species(1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 8 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Decision 92/452/EEC(2), as last amended by Decision 1999/685/EC(3), establishes a list of embryo collection teams and embryo production teams approved in third countries for the export of embryos of domestic animals of the bovine species to the Community;

(2) the competent veterinary services of Canada, Switzerland and the United States of America have forwarded requests for amendments to the lists of teams officially approved in their territories for the export of embryos of domestic animals of the bovine species to the Community; it is therefore necessary to amend the list of approved teams; guarantees regarding compliance with the requirements specified in Article 8 of Directive 89/556/EEC have been received by the Commission;

(3) the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The list concerning the United States of America in the Annex to Commission Decision 92/452/EEC is replaced by the list of the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

In the Annex to Decision 92/452/EEC:

- in the list concerning Canada, the following team is added:

- Team approval number: E 1479

Address: Embrun Veterinary Clinic , PO box 960 Embrun , Ontario

Team veterinarian: Dr Luc Besner

- in the list concerning Switzerland, the following team is added:

- Team approval number: CH-ET-1132

Address: Cabathuler Markus Tierarztpraxis, Embryotransfer Plattastutzweg 14 CH - 9476 Fontnas

Team veterinarians: Dr Fritz Reich, Dr Andreas Flükiger.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 December 1999.

For the Commission

David BYRNE

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 302, 19.10.1989, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 250, 29.8.1992, p. 40.

(3) OJ L 270, 20.10.1999, p. 33.

ANEXO/BILAG/ANHANG/[Pi ]ΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ/ANNEX/ANNEXE/ALLEGATO/BIJLAGE/ANEXO/LIITE/BILAGA

>TABLE>
§ 1917.114 Cargo doors. ( a ) *Mechanically operated.* ( 1 ) Cargo door counterweights shall be guarded.
( 2 ) Lift trucks and cranes shall not be used to move mechanically operated doors except when necessary during repair on the doors, in which case ropes or other guarding shall be provided to prevent entry into the area where the door may fall or slide.
( 3 ) Vertically operated doors partially opened for work or ventilation shall be secured to prevent accidental closing.
( b ) *Tackle operated.* ( 1 ) The door shall be connected to its lifting tackle with shackles or equally secure means.
( 2 ) Lifting bridles and tackles shall have a safety factor of five, based upon maximum anticipated static loading conditions.
( 3 ) Devices shall be provided to hold overhead doors in the open position and to secure them when closed.
( 4 ) Lifting gear and hardware shall be maintained in safe condition.
( 5 ) Lifting ropes, when used, shall be placed out of the work area and off the floor.
( c ) *Horizontal sliding.* ( 1 ) Horizontal sliding door rollers shall be constructed to prevent the door from jumping from overhead tracks.
( 2 ) Sliding doors shall be secured to prevent them from swinging.
09/09/201 1 14:50 FAX 2024935142 FAA ^ DMS @001/00 2 

* -

• - ^ - y .-- ;: • , . 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,.. _ 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ^ ^ " -^ 1 

WASHINGTON,D.c. r ^ ^'"^'-^^^^G CQCKE T 

In the matter ol' ) / r-i~3 ^ 

) FAA Docket No. CP10CE0003 -^ SS ^ 

GOJET AIRLINES, LLC ') T) 5^g § 

(VD GEAR PINS) ) DMS No. FAA-20I0-OO25 , ^^ ^.^c: ^ 

•) " ::^^^~ ^ 

COMPLAlNANT^S UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME 

DY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES TO FILE A RJEPLY BRIEF 

Complainant, the Federal Aviation Administration, files this Unopposed Request 

for an Extension of Time by Agreement of the Parties to File a Reply Brief in accordance 

with 14. C.F.R. § 13.233(c)(1). Complainant's Reply Brief is currently due on September 

9. 2011. Complainant requests an additional 28 days such that the Reply Brief would be 

due October 7, 2011. Prior to filing this request. Complainant contacted Mr. David 

Hayes, IIL Esq., cotinsel Lo Appellant who stated that he does not oppose this motion. 

Respeciliilly submitted, 

Peter Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

for Enforcement 

Charles RaJey, Atiorncy 

Enlbrcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Phone: (202) 267-3357 

Facsimile; (202)267-5106 

Dated; September 6, 2011 
09/09/201 1 14-50 FAX 2024935142 FAA - DMS 21002/002 

Certificate of Service 

I hereby cenify that on this date 1 have delivered by personal delivery, the original 

and a copy of Complainant's Unopposed Request for an Extension of Time by 

Agreement of the Parties to File a Replv BncfJn the Mailer o/GoJel Airlines, LLC, 

Docket No. CP10CE0003, addressed to: 

Federal Aviarion Administration 

riOO Independence Avenue. S.W, 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Atm: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

In addition. I hereby certify that on this date 1 have sent by the U.S. mail one copy 

of ihe foregoing document to; 

David J. A. Hayes, II, K'sq. 

Vice President & General Counsel 

Trans State Airlines Inc. 

11495 Natural Bridge Rd., Suite 303 

Bridgeton, MO 63044 

Dated: September 6, 2011
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greens Worldwide Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Thomas Kidd, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ R. Thomas Kidd

______________________________________

R Thomas Kidd

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

May 18, 2006
= 4

¥ ?
» <es i
Bx p os
USDA o * —
—— ey
United States United States United States a

Department of Department of Department of .
Agriculture Hometand Security the Interior
x

% \ = .

~ N,

OF THE UNITED § STATES”

4 ‘s

It’s illegal to smuggle birds — wild and domestic —
and their products into the United States.

If you do, it will cost yous,

BH Upto $250,000 fine and 5 years injprison
for any. individual

Up to $500,000 fine and 5 years in prison
for any business or organization

-800-BE ALERT to report

undeclared bird products

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and-employer. © May 2007
#### § 1902.15 Certification of the record of a hearing.

Upon completion of any formal or informal hearing, the transcript thereof, together with written submissions, exhibits filed during the hearing, and any post-hearing presentations shall be certified by the officer presiding at the hearing to the Assistant Secretary.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harold Shell, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 214]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Juanita Bing Newton, J.), entered on or about June 15, 1998, which denied defendant’s motion for remission of forfeited bail, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record demonstrates that, contrary to defendant’s contention, his bail was reinstated, not exonerated, on February 22, 1990. Accordingly, a new forfeiture order was properly entered on June 19, 1990 when defendant failed to appear in court due to his incarceration. Thus, it was a proper exercise of discretion to deny the motion for remission since defendant’s incarceration after committing a crime while out on bail “did not constitute an exceptional circumstance, and was the result of his willful conduct” *(People v Cotto,*262 AD2d 138). Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Tom, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.
#### § 1910.8 OMB control numbers under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

The following sections or paragraphs each contain a collection of information requirement which has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under the control number listed.

| 29 CFR citation | OMB control No. |
| --- | --- |
| 1910.7 | 1218-0147 |
| 1910.23 | 1218-0199 |
| 1910.27 | 1218-0199 |
| 1910.28 | 1218-0199 |
| 1910.66 | 1218-0121 |
| 1910.67(b) | 1218-0230 |
| 1910.68 | 1218-0226 |
| 1910.95 | 1218-0048 |
| 1910.111 | 1218-0208 |
| 1910.119 | 1218-0200 |
| 1910.120 | 1218-0202 |
| 1910.132 | 1218-0205 |
| 1910.134 | 1218-0099 |
| 1910.137 | 1218-0190 |
| 1910.142 | 1218-0096 |
| 1910.145 | 1218-0132 |
| 1910.146 | 1218-0203 |
| 1910.147 | 1218-0150 |
| 1910.156 | 1218-0075 |
| 1910.157(e)(3) | 1218-0210 |
| 1910.157(f)(16) | 1218-0218 |
| 1910.177(d)(3)(iv) | 1218-0219 |
| 1910.179(j)(2)(iii) and (iv) | 1218-0224 |
| 1910.179(m)(1) and (m)(2) | 1218-0224 |
| 1910.180(d)(6) | 1218-0221 |
| 1910.180(g)(1) and (g)(2)(ii) | 1218-0221 |
| 1910.181(g)(1) and (g)(3) | 1218-0222 |
| 1910.184(e)(4), (f)(4) and (i)(8)(ii) | 1218-0223 |
| 1910.217(e)(1)(i) and (ii) | 1218-0229 |
| 1910.217(g) | 1218-0070 |
| 1910.217(h) | 1218-0143 |
| 1910.218(a)(2)(i) and (ii) | 1218-0228 |
| 1910.252(a)(2)(xiii)(*c*) | 1218-0207 |
| 1910.255(e) | 1218-0207 |
| 1910.266 | 1218-0198 |
| 1910.268 | 1218-0225 |
| 1910.269 | 1218-0190 |
| 1910.272 | 1218-0206 |
| 1910.302 | 1218-0256 |
| 1910.303 | 1218-0256 |
| 1910.304 | 1218-0256 |
| 1910.305 | 1218-0256 |
| 1910.306 | 1218-0256 |
| 1910.307 | 1218-0256 |
| 1910.308 | 1218-0256 |
| 1910.420 | 1218-0069 |
| 1910.421 | 1218-0069 |
| 1910.423 | 1218-0069 |
| 1910.430 | 1218-0069 |
| 1910.440 | 1218-0069 |
| 1910.1001 | 1218-0133 |
| 1910.1003 | 1218-0085 |
| 1910.1004 | 1218-0084 |
| 1910.1006 | 1218-0086 |
| 1910.1007 | 1218-0083 |
| 1910.1008 | 1218-0087 |
| 1910.1009 | 1218-0089 |
| 1910.1010 | 1218-0082 |
| 1910.1011 | 1218-0090 |
| 1910.1012 | 1218-0080 |
| 1910.1013 | 1218-0079 |
| 1910.1014 | 1218-0088 |
| 1910.1015 | 1218-0044 |
| 1910.1016 | 1218-0081 |
| 1910.1017 | 1218-0010 |
| 1910.1018 | 1218-0104 |
| 1910.1020 | 1218-0065 |
| 1910.1024 | 1218-0267 |
| 1910.1025 | 1218-0092 |
| 1910.1026 | 1218-0252 |
| 1910.1027 | 1218-0185 |
| 1910.1028 | 1218-0129 |
| 1910.1029 | 1218-0128 |
| 1910.1030 | 1218-0180 |
| 1910.1043 | 1218-0061 |
| 1910.1044 | 1218-0101 |
| 1910.1045 | 1218-0126 |
| 1910.1047 | 1218-0108 |
| 1910.1048 | 1218-0145 |
| 1910.1050 | 1218-0184 |
| 1910.1051 | 1218-0170 |
| 1910.1052 | 1218-0179 |
| 1910.1053 | 1218-0266 |
| 1910.1096 | 1218-0103 |
| 1910.1200 | 1218-0072 |
| 1910.1450 | 1218-0131 |

[61 FR 5508, Feb. 13, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 29668, June 2, 1997; 62 FR 42666, Aug. 8, 1997; 62 FR 43581, Aug. 14, 1997; 62 FR 65203, Dec. 11, 1997; 63 FR 13340, Mar. 19, 1998; 63 FR 17093, Apr. 8, 1998; 71 FR 38086, July 5, 2006; 72 FR 40075, July 23, 2007; 81 FR 48710, July 26, 2016; 82 FR 31253, July 6, 2017; 83 FR 9702, Mar. 7, 2018]
ROLANDO BROWN

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 1259

__________ ___________________/

Opinion filed July 19, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Angela C. Dempsey , Judge

.

Rolando Brown, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Giselle D. Lylen, Assistant Attorney

Gene ral, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, B.L. THOMAS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### § 95.11 General.

The areas described in this subpart are designated mountainous areas.

[Doc. No. 1580, 28 FR 6718, June 29, 1963]