alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Rosa Ottmann, App’lt, *v.*John Griffin and Ano., Resp’ts.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,*

*Filed June 28, 1889.)*

Bill oe particulars—To what limited.

In an action to recover certain chattels, *Held,*that the order requiring the plaintiff to furnish a bill of particulars, should be limited to the number, description and value of the articles sought to be recovered.

Appeal from an order of the city court of Yonkers, directing plaintiff to furnish a bill of particulars.

The complaint demands, judgment for $450, to wit, for the return of six masquerade suits, or their value, $300, and $150 damages. The original complaint, which was read on the motion, alleges that plaintiff sublet to the defendants thirty-six masquerade suits, of which she was the lessee, and which she (not the defendants) agreed to return or forfeit $1,800. She claims that six of the suits were not returned by defendants. The answer is a general denial.

The moving affidavit, verified by both defendants, avers that the chattels were never delivered to them, and that they do not know the quality of the chattels, the stuff of which the same were made, the styles or patterns thereof, the number of pieces of which the same consisted, or the age or condition thereof, or the names of the persons to whom the same were delivered, and that they cannot safely proceed to trial without a bill of particulars specifying those facts, and the value of each article separately.

*699The order of the court is, that the bill be furnished by plaintiff, “ giving the number, description and value of the articles which she sues to recover, and the names of the persons to whom the same were delivered, and as fully as she may be able, the residence of each of such persons, and as to each of such matters as she shall not be able so to state, she must state in writing that she does not know and never did know, and why she has not knowledge.”

*J. C. & W. J. Donohue,*for app’lt; *B. E. & A. J. Prime & Burns,*for resp’ ts.

Dykman, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the city court of Yonkers, requiring the plaintiff to furnish a bill of particulars, and, we think, the order requires too much.

It is the office of a bill of particulars to specify the items of the claim set up in a pleading, and apprise the opposite party of the particulars of the claim. But a party cannot be required to furnish the evidence by which his claim is to be established upon the trial.

The defendant can require no more in this action than the number, description and value of the articles which the plaintiff seeks to recover. All the other requirements of the order should be stricken out, and, as so modified, the order should be affirmed, without costs to either party on this appeal.

All concur.
#### Rogers *vs.*Holley.

ALBANY,

Dec. 1838.

In a suit against an executor, where a report of referees is made in favor of the plaintiff, though the court may not consider it a fit case to award costs in favor of the plaintiff, yet they will allow him to take judgment for the interest of the sum reported due in the same manner as if costs had been awarded, where he has been delayed by the defendant in entering judgment by a motion to set aside the report.

This was an action of *assumpsit,*against the defendant as an *executor.*The cause was referred and a report made in favor of the plaintiff, which the defendant attempted to set aside on the merits. Whilst the application for that purpose was pending, the plaintiff was stayed from entering judgment. After a considerable lapse of time, the motion to set aside the report was heard and denied, and judgment rendered for the sum reported. The plaintiff then made a *special application*for *costs,*which was not granted, the court being of opinion that it was not a case in which costs ought to be awarded. The plaintiff at a subsequent term asked for a rule that he be permitted, besides taking judgment for the *sum reported due*by the referees, to enter upon the roll a judgment for the *amount of interest*accrued upon the sum reported due, *in the same manner as if costs had been awarded*to the plaintiff upon the special application formerly made by him. This, it was insisted, he was entitled to, for the reason that if this was an ordinary case in which costs followed the recovery, it would be *of course*for the taxing officer to add the interest in the taxation of the costs; but here there were no costs to be taxed, and consequently there was no mode in which the interest could be recovered without a special order of the court. The giving of costs in cases *against executors*resting in the discretion of the court, if the court granted the rule, the propriety of granting it could not be questioned in any other court, as the exercise of the discretion of this court could not be reviewed, and therefore the motion ought to prevail.

*625A rule was ORDERED to be entered that the plaintiff have leave in the record of judgment to be made up by him, to take judgment fo~ the interest of the sum reported due by the referees, the same as for costs; but that costs of suit should not be tared against the defendant.*

*

 Decided 7th December, 1837.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-20-00364-CR

EX PARTE Bobby BORDELON

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-2215-CR-C

Honorable William J. Old, III, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE WATKINS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order denying 

appellant’s habeas application seeking to reduce the amount of his bond is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED May 19, 2021.

_____________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
§ 1915.503 Precautions for hot work. ( a ) *General requirements* — ( 1 ) *Designated Areas.* The employer may designate areas for hot work in sites such as vessels, vessel sections, fabricating shops, and subassembly areas that are free of fire hazards.
( 2 ) *Non-designated Areas.* ( i ) Before authorizing hot work in a non-designated area, the employer must visually inspect the area where hot work is to be performed, including adjacent spaces, to ensure the area is free of fire hazards, unless a Marine Chemist's certificate or Shipyard Competent Person's log is used for authorization.
( ii ) The employer shall authorize employees to perform hot work only in areas that are free of fire hazards, or that have been controlled by physical isolation, fire watches, or other positive means. Note to paragraph ( a
)(2):
The requirements of paragraph (a)(2) apply to all hot work operations in shipyard employment except those covered by § 1915.14.
( b ) *Specific requirements* — ( 1 ) *Maintaining fire hazard-free conditions.* The employer must keep all hot work areas free of new hazards that may cause or contribute to the spread of fire. Unexpected energizing and energy release are covered by 29 CFR 1915.181, Subpart L. Exposure to toxic and hazardous substances is covered in 29 CFR 1915.1000 through 1915.1450, subpart Z.
( 2 ) *Fuel gas and oxygen supply lines and torches.* The employer must make sure that: ( i ) No unattended fuel gas and oxygen hose lines or torches are in confined spaces;
( ii ) No unattended charged fuel gas and oxygen hose lines or torches are in enclosed spaces for more than 15 minutes; and
( iii ) All fuel gas and oxygen hose lines are disconnected at the supply manifold at the end of each shift;
( iv ) All disconnected fuel gas and oxygen hose lines are rolled back to the supply manifold or to open air to disconnect the torch; or extended fuel gas and oxygen hose lines are not reconnected at the supply manifold unless the lines are given a positive means of identification when they were first connected and the lines are tested using a drop test or other positive means to ensure the integrity of fuel gas and oxygen burning system.
2 A tt a c h m e n t s

Goo d a f te r n oo n I d a l ia,

H e r e i s t h e in f o r m ati o n r e g a r d i n g t h e e q u i p m e n t at t h e f i v e N J D E P f a c i l it i e s:

C a m de n : F os te r W h e e l e r b o i l e r w i t h a D et r o it S t o k e r h o r i z o n t a l f o r w a r d r e c i p r oc ati n g g r a te

in s t a ll e d b y F o s te r W h e e l e r.

Glo u c e s te r : B & W b o i l e r w i t h a V o n Roll ( S w i ss ) f o r w a r d r e c i p r oc at i n g i n cl ine d g r ate in s ta ll e d b y

W h ee l a b r a t o r.

W a r r e n : Blo u nt b o i l e r w it h a W & E ( S w i ss ) h o r i z o n t a l f o rw a r d r e c i p r oc ati n g g r a te in s ta ll e d b y

Blo u n t.

E ss e x : D e u t sc h e B abcoc k A n l a g e n ( G e r m a n ) r oll e r g r ate w it h a D B A / A m e r i c a n R e f

- fu e l b o i l e r

in s t a ll e d b y Am e r i c an R e f-f u e l.

Un i o n : M a r tin G m b H ( G e r m a n ) b o i l e r an d r e v e r s e

- r e c i p r oc ati n g i n c l i ne d g r ate i n s ta ll e d b y O g de n

M a r t i n S y s te m s

, n o w C o v anta E ne rg y

. T h i s i s t h e f a c i l it y m os t co m pa r ab l e t o t h e C o v an t a

S t ani sl a u s f a c i l it y in t h e SJ V. S J V R u l e 4352 R e spons e s : N J D E P F a c i l it y i n f o r m a ti on

N i c ho l e C o r l e ss

t o :

I d a l i a P e rez

09 / 04 / 2012 02 : 01 P M

C c :

E r r o l V i l l e g a s, J e ss i F i e r r o

H i d e D e t a il s

F r o m: N i c ho l e C o r l e ss < N i c ho l e

. C o r l e ss@v a ll e y a i r .o r g>

To : I d a l i a P e re z /R 9 / U S E P A / U S @E P A

C c : E rr o l V i ll e g a s <e r r o l .v i l l e g a s@v a ll e y a i r .o r g> , J e ss i F i e rr o

< J e ss i c a

. F i er

r o@v a l l e y a i r .o r g>

i ma ge0 0 1

. p ng i ma ge0 0 2

. g ifP

l e a s e co nta c t m e i f y o u h a v e a n y fur t h e r q u e s ti o n s

. I w i ll be i n a t

r ain i n g t h i s a f te r n oo n b u t I w i l l

b e a v a i l ab l e to m o r r o w.

N i c h ole

N i c ho l e C o r l ess

Ai r Qua l i t y S p eci a l ist

S a n J o a q u i n V all e y

A i r P o ll u t i o n C o n tr o l D i s tr i c t

19 9 0 E. G ett y s b u r g

F re s n o, C A 9 3 726

55 9 .23 0 .61 41
# **Exhibit 23.02**

 

 

 

 

## CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

Pursuant to 17 CFR 230.437a, a written consent of Arthur Andersen LLP(Andersen) is omitted relating to a prior period for which Andersen was engagedas independent public accountant. As of the filing date, after reasonableefforts, KU had not already obtained such a written consent nor anticipatesbeing able to obtain such a consent. The lack of written consent may limit thelegal recourse, if any, of investors against Andersen in claims under certainsecurities laws based upon the fact of Andersen’s engagement as independentpublic accountant, including provision of an accountant’s report by Andersenand inclusion of such report in public filings.

 

----

**Exhibit23.02**

 

 

March 25, 2003

 

 

Kentucky Utilities Company and Subsidiary

220 West Main Street

P.O. Box 32010

Louisville, Kentucky 40232

 

Enclosed are our manually signed reports to the use in the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of our reports dated January 21, 2003 relating to theconsolidated financial statement schedules of Kentucky Utilities Company andSubsidiary (the “Company”).

 

Our manually signed reports serve to authorize the use of our name onour reports in the electronic filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K with the SEC.

 

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP     |

 

 

 

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Korn/Ferry International, a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his best knowledge:



(a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2005 (the
Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  July 8, 2005



By:

/s/    PAUL C.
REILLYName:

Paul C. ReillyTitle:

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/    GARY D.
BURNISONName:

Gary D. BurnisonTitle:

Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
# EUR-Lex - 31996D0094 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996D0094

**96/94/EC: Commission Decision of 12 January 1996 authorizing Sweden to maintain its national measures as regards infectious pancreatic necrosis and bacterial kidney disease in application of Article 12 (4) of Council Directive 91/67/EEC (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 021 , 27/01/1996 P. 0073 - 0073 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 12 January 1996 authorizing Sweden to maintain its national measures as regards infectious pancreatic necrosis and bacterial kidney disease in application of Article 12 (4) of Council Directive 91/67/EEC (Text with EEA relevance) (96/94/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/67/EEC of 28 January 1991 concerning the animal health conditions governing the placing on the market of aquaculture animals and products (1), as last amended by Council Directive 95/22/EC (2), and in particular Article 12 (4) thereof,

Whereas Sweden has presented programmes for the control of a number of animal diseases and has submitted an application for additional trade guarantees to the Commission; whereas the applications have been examined by the Commission; whereas a more detailed examination is necessary in the case of the application relating to infectious pancreatic necrosis and bacterial kidney disease;

Whereas it is necessary to extend the special measures which apply to trade in fish to Sweden while this examination is being carried out;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Sweden is authorized to maintain its national measures relating to infectious pancreatic necrosis and bacterial kidney disease until 31 December 1996.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 January 1996.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 46, 19. 2. 1991, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 243, 11. 10. 1995, p. 1.
#### § 1695.9 Rescinded guidance.

The Commission shall not cite, use, or rely on guidance documents that are rescinded, except to establish historical facts.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31304-31305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12397]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge 
Reservation

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 31305]]

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Oak Ridge. The 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires 
that public notice of these meetings be announced in the Federal 
Register.

DATES: Wednesday, June 7, 2000, 6:00-9:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Garden Plaza, 215 S. Illinois Avenue, Oak Ridge, TN.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theresa Perry, Federal Coordinator, 
Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 2001, EM-
90, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, (865) 576-8956.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE and its regulators in the areas of environmental 
restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: Overview of the Oak Ridge Reservation Watersheds, 
presented by DOE/ORO EM.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Committee either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to 
agenda items should contact Carol Davis at the address or telephone 
number listed above. Requests must be received 5 days prior to the 
meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include the 
presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer is 
empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. Each individual wishing to make public 
comment will be provided a maximum of 5 minutes to present their 
comments at the end of the meeting.
    Minutes: Minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying at the Department of Energy's Information Resource 
Center at 105 Broadway, Oak Ridge, TN between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. 
Monday through Friday, or by writing to Teresa Perry, Department of 
Energy, Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 2001, EM-90, Oak Ridge, 
TN 37831 or by calling her at (423) 576-8956.

    Issued at Washington, DC on May 12, 2000.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-12397 Filed 5-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
§ 171.21 Scope. ( a ) This subpart sets forth minimum requirements for the approval and operation of non-Federal, nondirectional radio beacon facilities that are to be involved in the approval of instrument flight rules and air traffic control procedures related to those facilities.
( b ) A nondirectional radio beacon (“H” facilities domestically—NDB facilities internationally) radiates a continuous carrier of approximately equal intensity at all azimuths. The carrier is modulated at 1020 cycles per second for station identification purposes.
[Doc. No. 5034, 29 FR 11337, Aug. 6, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 171-2, 31 FR 5408, Apr. 6, 1966; Amdt. 171-7, 35 FR 12711, Aug. 11, 1970]
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                ------------

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  for the
three-month  period  ended  March 31,  2003 of inCall  Systems,  Inc.,  a Nevada
corporation  (the  "Company"),   as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Quarterly  Report"),  I,  Marc  Crimeni,
Chairman  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information  contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operation of
the Company.


                                 /s/ Marc Crimeni
                                 --------------------------
                                 Marc Crimeni, Chairman and
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 September 29, 2003




<PAGE>


                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  for the
three-month  period  ended  March 31,  2003 of inCall  Systems,  Inc.,  a Nevada
corporation  (the  "Company"),   as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Quarterly  Report"),  I,  Robert  Harris,
Treasurer and a Director of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information  contained in this Quarterly Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.


                                /s/ Robert Harris
                                --------------------------------------
                                    Robert Harris, Treasurer, Director
                                    (Principal Financial Officer)
                                    September 29, 2003


                                       2
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief
Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    LEO F. WELLS, III                                     
|Leo F. Wells, III Chief Executive
Officer November 12, 2004  
|
|
|/s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS                                   
|Douglas P. Williams Chief
Financial Officer November 12, 2004
|
|