alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE ex BARNER v MARSH et

Ohio Supreme Court

No. 21356.

Decided Oct. 23, 1929

Syllabus by

MARSHALL, CJ.

COURTS

(180 Jm) The Supreme Court of Ohio is without jurisdiction to entertain a suit originally filed therein to determine the validity of a judgment entered in any court of inferior jurisdiction, the validity of which is challenged on the ground of alleged fraud in procuring, the' same.

(180 A) By virtue of section 6, article IV, of the Ohio Constitution, the judges of the Courts of Appeals are elected by districts, and each judge holds office and serves primarily in the district of his residence. That section further provides that each judge shall be competent to exercise judicial powers in any appellate district of the state. Judges properly designated may hold court in any district, and when so holding court are not required to be physically present within such district.

The procedure for assignment of a judge of the Court of Appeals for service in a district other than that of his residence is regulated by statute and any irregularity in following such procedure does not defeat the jurisdiction of such judge or render void a judgment in which he participates.

The chief justice of the Court of Appeals is not required to evidence his assignment or designation by a written order.

(180 Ja) The jurisdiction of a judge of any Court of Appeals while serving in a district other than that of his residence cannot be challenged on the ground of irregularity of the procedure whereby he was designated for such service by collateral attack upon the judgment rendered. (Ex Parte Strang 21 Ohio St., 610; State v. Gardner, 54 Ohio St., 24; Steiss v. State, 103 Ohio St., 33, approved and followed.)

TRIAL

(590 Jo) Where party has received and accepted the fruits and benefits of a judgment in his f,avor, he will not be heard to challenge the validity of such judgment without first restoring or offering to'restore such fruits and benefits to the adverse party.

Kinkade, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.' Robinson, J., concurs in propositions one to five, inclusive, of the syllabus, and in the judgment.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > International Banking Act of 1978

              														International Banking Act of 1978, September 17, 1978.						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1041,			accessed on September 6, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### Estate of Julius Wadsworth.

*(Surrogate’s*Court, *New York County,*

*Filed June 21, 1889.)*

Guardian — Responsibilities of special suabdian—Report oe—What SHOULD CONTAIN—ALLOWANCE TO.

The report to the court of a special guardian should give a full account of the matters in his charge—stating his conclusions ana his reasons therefor, and all must he based upon his own personal investigation. Without such personal investigation he should not accept the most solemn assurance of the executor supplemented by personal statements of his counsel. He is the arm of the court and in his person this beneficent policy of the law is to he executed.

Rahsom, S.

The special guardian has discharged his duty in -this proceeding with great thoroughness, and he is entitled to fair ■compensation for his professional service.

Special guardians are the most important officers of the court Their responsibilities are much graver than those of a referee; they must act independently of all persons interested in the ■estate. Family influence should not deter them from a most searching inquiry into all matters of interest to their ward. The solemn assurances of the most respectable executor, supplemented by personal statements of his counsel, that of his own personal knowledge the details of the account are lawful and mathematically correct, would not justify these officers of the court in passing a single item of the account, nor any question of law involved, without personal examination. They must inquire aud investigate, and then decide as to all matters in which their ward is interested. Their report to the court should give a full account of the matters in their charge, stating their conclusions, and theh reasons therefor, and all must be based upon their indepedent personal investigation. The court is jealous of the rights of infants, and will be watchful over them and their property. The special guardian is the arm of the court, and in his person this beneficent policy of the law is to be executed.

In this proceeding the special guardian has fitly discharged his duty, and he must be paid a proper fee for his labor and the responsibility of his office, which, in this proceeding, was great. I have given due consideration to the affidavits, and briefs submitted. I am not able to agree precisely with either side. The *417¡amount claimed is a little more than I can allow, and the amount suggested by learned counsel for executors is much less than the sum I think was fairly earned. I allow the special guardian $1,000.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1579

ALEMAYEHU WOLDEMARIAM, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A24-601-749) Submitted: March 6, 2006 Decided: March 17, 2006 Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allan Ebert, LAW OFFICES OF ALLAN EBERT, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Eric W. Marsteller, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Alemayehu Woldemariam, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal of an Immigration Judge’s order denying him a waiver of inadmissibility under § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c). On appeal, Woldemariam argues that a July 17, 2001 in absentia order of removal was implicitly rescinded when the Immigration Judge accepted his application for a § 212(c) waiver and thus he is in fact a lawful permanent resident eligible for the waiver. We find no evidence in the record that the July 17, 2001 order of removal was ever rescinded. Thus, Woldemariam was no longer a lawful permanent resident and was not eligible for the § 212(c) waiver. Accordingly, Woldemariam’s contention lacks merit. Woldemariam further asserts that the court violated his due process rights when it determined that he was ineligible for the § 212(c) waiver and § 212(a)(2)(A)(ii) petty offense exception based on the allegation of multiple convictions for which he was never charged in the Notice to Appear. This argument is also without merit. First, the denial of a request for a waiver of inadmissibility pursuant to § 212(c) cannot constitute a due process violation, b ecause an alien has no constitutionallyprotected liberty or property interest in the “right” to- 3 - discretionary relief. SeeSmith v. Ashcroft , 295 F.3d 425, 429 (4th Cir. 2002). Moreover, Woldemariam’s application for a § 212(c) waiver was denied because he was not a lawful permanent resident, not because he allegedly had multiple convictions. Finally, Woldemariam was denied eligibility for the § 212(a)(2)(A)(ii) exception because he faced a maximum of five years in prison for his forgery conviction, not because of multiple convictions. Accordingly the petition for review is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
KENNETH D. BARGAINEER

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 1838

__ ___________________________/

Opinion filed September 3, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Michael C. Overstreet , Judge

.

Kenneth D. Bargaineer, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### § 125.328 Prohibition on crew interference.

No person may assault, threaten, intimidate, or interfere with a crewmember in the performance of the crewmember's duties aboard an aircraft being operated under this part.

[Doc. No. FAA-1998-4954, 64 FR 1080, Jan. 7, 1999]
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 38
/ Amendments to Part B .Information Requirements for Disposal Facilities . 52 FR 23447-23450 . June 22, 1987 as amended on September 9, 1987, 

### at 52 FR 33936 (Non-HSWA Cluster III) FEDERAL REOUIREMENT FEDERAL. RCM CITAnoN ANALOGOUS • STATE CITATION

1 PART 270 • EPA ADMINISTERED PERMIT PROGRAMS: THE HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT PROGRAM SUBPART B - PERMIT APPLICATION CONTENTS OF PART**~:** GENERAL REQUIREMENTS reference to 264.9S(h)(5) ; 

### WAC 173-303-806 written 

### . (4)(a)(xx)(G) X authorization 270.14(c){7) add subparagraph 

### WAC 173-303-806 on schedule of submittal 270.14(cllSllv) 

### . (4)(a)(xx)(H)(iii) X 1 Also see technical correction to the rule at 52 FR 33936 (September 9, 1987).



### June 

### 22. 1987 • Page 

### 1 of 1
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 14, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Lana FranksLana FranksPresident (Principal Executive Officer)Date: August 14, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Thomas OSullivanThomas OSullivanChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) 29
#### § 1918.36 Weather deck rails.

Removable weather deck rails shall be kept in place except when cargo operations require them to be removed, in which case they shall be replaced as soon as such cargo operations are completed.
April 6, 2000

Ms. Brenda Edwards-Jones U. S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts, Docket No. EE-RM-97-500 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 208585-0121,


### Dear Ms. Edwards-Jones: Please find Robertson Worldwide's statement for the April 18, 2000 Department of Energy Public Hearing. I am Robert Pelino, Chief Operating Officer of Robertson Worldwide, and a member of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). I am here representing Robertson Worldwide. Robertson believes that the current Proposed Ballast Rule satisfies all of the legal requirements and adequately addresses all of the Stakeholders concerns. Robertson supports the comments of the Ballast Section of NEMA as presented earlier in the hearing by Norm Grimshaw and also supports the proposed Ballast Rule submitted by the Joint Stakeholders and outlined by the DOE in the March 15,2000 Federal Register Notice. Therefore, Robertson requests the Department of Energy to adopt this Proposed Rule as the Final Rule. Thank you,
Robert D. Pelino Chief Operating Officer

13611 Thornton Road, Blue Island, Illinois 60406

Phones: 708-388-2315 Fax: 708-388-2420 Toll Free: 800-323-5633 www. robertsonww.com WlJRl.DWll1£ '0' 

### INNOVATIVE LIGHTING SOLUTIONS

April 6, 2000 Ms. BrendaEdwards-Jones U.S. Department ofEnergy Office ofEnergy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts, Docket No. EE-RM-97-500 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 208585-0121 j
Dear Ms. Edwards-Jones: Please find Robertson Worldwide's statement for the April 18, 2000 Department ofEnergy Public Hearing.
I am Robert Pelino, ChiefOperating Officer ofRobertson Worldwide, and a member ofthe National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). I am here representing Robertson Worldwide. / Robertson believes that the current Proposed Ballast Rule satisfies all ofthe legal requirements and adequately addresses all ofthe Stakeholders concerns. Robertson supports the comments of the Ballast Section ofNEMA as presented earlier in the hearing by Norm Grimshaw and also supports the proposed Ballast Rule submitted by the Joint Stakeholders and outlined by the DOE in the March 15,2000 Federal RegisterNotice. Therefore, Robertson requests the Department of Energy to adopt this Proposed Rule as the Final Rule.
Thank you,
Robert D. Pelino ChiefOperating Officer

13611 Thornton Road, Blue Island, Illinois 60406 Phones: 708-388-2315 Fax: 708-388-2420 Toll Free: 800-323-5633 www.robertsonww.com
\
105**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, James Y. Gleasman, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of Torvec, Inc.,hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Torvec, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) [Reserved] [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8392 and 34-49313.]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based upon such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date: March 31, 2007 S — James Y. Gleasman James Y. Gleasman ChiefExecutive Officer, Interim Chief FinancialOfficer
# BS , IDAH O rAllSBICIOHA l 41 1 ^OR T

MIK E CRAP O

rr t til- - Et llJ l nc rC<-i.i.u* t 

# HnittdState s ,^iw m VVAEHINGTC'h . D C I-HI O Augus tiy , 201 U =twi?.nij'.iF,>i t iij: j =u3LiL-'.'.o=<.; > F.wnr.F i INhlA N AFFAIR S Th e Hcnorabl e Ra yLaHoo d Secretary ' o fTransportatio n U.S . Deparimen tDlTfansocrtalio n 40 0 f Siree tS.W . Washington , O C 2059 0 Dea rSscretar yLaHood : I a m writin g i n suppor to ftheapplicaiio n fo rgran tfund s unde - th e Smal l Communit y AirSer/ic e Developmen tGran t Progrs m submitte d b yth e Idah o Falis ^ Idah o Regiona l Airport . I hi s month , Idah o Kail s wil l los e it s ser\'io e fro m Horizo n Air , connectin g passenger s t o Boise , Portland . Seattle . Spokan e an d Norther n California . Th e diECon:inuanc e o " servic e wa s 3 facto ro finterna l siriin g reconfiguratio n an d no t a lac k o fdeman d i n th e area . > O-- ) ;C: J

C O

Thi s rtrestbouncservic e i s critica l t o th e Idah o Fall s busines s con-munit yi n tha t nos t loca l companie s d o busines s i n th e Northwes tregion . Idah o Hall s i s hom e t o th e Departmen to fEnerg yIdah o Nationa l Laborator yan d th e managin o oornpanibs . Travele rcensu s estimate s sho wmor e tha n 400,00 0 fo rth e Easter rIdah o Regio n an d th e neares thu b airpor ti s ove ra ttire e hou rdriv e away , I understan d tha tth e Cit yo fIdah o Fall s ha s Identifie d tiv o o rthre e ai rearner s tha t ma yb e abl e t o provid e westboun d servic e fo rth e region . I fsuccessfu l i n obtainin g th e requeste d gran tfunds , th e Crtyvyil l b e abl e t o approac h thos e airline s wit h revenu s guarantees , cos treduclicns , introductor yfares , an d extensiv e advertisin g t o initiat e th e star tu p o fne wser/ic e t o tJi e community . Idah o Fall s i s m yhometo^v n an d I full yunderstan d an d appreciat e th e importanc e of westboun d commercia l serS/ic s t o th e busines s communit yan d citizen s o fth e region . I urg e th e Departmen- . o fTransportatio n t o g v e tii s proposa l al l cu e consideration . Sincerely , P/lichae l L) . Grap o Unite d Stale s Smialu i MDC'rr t

•avi a r.C"--i.C L :4%arf\^«ri.::^«l- : .'.Jll|M - LV^f ^ •;:i;;t-.-ii ; o>rij:i > :t<»- u i •..»r\>r.-ur» r I'jla'JUi ^ tkk^OCC^ U Jl^Jli-V.l'.i.'rt ^ rt^^Zn^xyJZ. : j,K.n i •tii>«icci n fj- l iu: > It " ,il i .i» j : '.Ji.-' 4 rt»r:-.-w..ntJiii i t.-;i»it i lo-j " »:• - ."aVA.(ri'tJl»n- « -..•ijv . lii-iJii:.;^; : V^'^XJMJ'^y. - IlICL-r^r . :./. . U r jivrfs H L'«; i

Idah o Fall s Regiona l Airport- Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen tGran t- Augus t201 0
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Print & digital federalpublications catalog**
 
2013-2014 | 2014-2015| 2015-2016
 
SuDoc Number:GP 3.22/9:
Item Number:0556-C (online) | 0552-A-03(online)
CGP systemNumber:000934117
 
April 14, 2020
# EUR-Lex - 31998R2460 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998R2460

**Council Regulation (EC, ECSC, Euratom) No 2460/98 of 12 November 1998 amending Regulation No 7/66/Euratom, 122/66/EEC laying down the list of places for which a transport allowance may be granted, the maximum amount of that allowance and the rules for granting it **

*
Official Journal L 307 , 17/11/1998 P. 0004 - 0004 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC, ECSC, EURATOM) No 2460/98 of 12 November 1998 amending Regulation No 7/66/Euratom, 122/66/EEC laying down the list of places for which a transport allowance may be granted, the maximum amount of that allowance and the rules for granting it

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing a single Council and a single Commission of the European Communities,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas, having regard to Council Regulation (EC, ECSC, EURATOM) No 2458/98 of 12 November 1998 amending Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 laying down the Staff Regulations of officials and the conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities and the other Regulations applicable to them with regard to the establishment of remuneration, pensions and other financial entitlements in euros (1), Regulation No 7/66/Euratom, 122/66/EEC (2) should be amended,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Regulation No 7/66/Euratom, 122/66/EEC the term 'Belgian francs` is replaced by the term 'euros` and amounts expressed in Belgian francs are replaced by their equivalent in euro units at the conversion rate adopted by the Council.

The rules relating to the rounding of amounts laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1103/97 of 17 June 1997 on certain provisions relating to the introduction of the euro (3) shall apply.

Article 2

On 1 January 1999, pursuant to this Regulation, the Commission shall effect the conversion to the euro of the amounts in Belgian francs in Regulation No 7/66/Euratom, 122/66/EEC; these values shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Community in January 1999.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Community.

It shall apply from 1 January 1999.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 November 1998.

For the Council

The President

E. HOSTASCH

(1) See page 1 of this Official Journal.

(2) OJ 150, 12. 8. 1966, p. 2751/66.

(3) OJ L 162, 19. 6. 1997, p. 1.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code



I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2003 (the 10-Q) of GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc. (GEO) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of GEO as of the dates and for the periods covered by the 10-Q.



|                        |  |  |  | GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc.                         
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2003 |  |  |  | By:                                                   
|                        |  |  |  | George P. Ahearn President and
Chief Executive Officer