alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARTICLES OF MERGER
                                       FOR
                           POZZOLANIC RESOURCES, INC.,
                           (a Washington corporation)

                                       AND

                              ISG RESOURCES, INC.,
                              (a Utah corporation)

         Pursuant to the provisions of sections 23B.11.070 and 23B.11.050 of the
Washington  Business  Corporation Act (the "Act"),  ISG Resources,  Inc., a Utah
corporation (the "Corporation"),  hereby adopts and files the following Articles
of Merger as the surviving  corporation  to the merger of Pozzolanic  Resources,
Inc., a Washington corporation, with and into the Corporation:

          FIRST: The Plan of Merger (the "Plan") is attached  hereto and is made
               a part hereof.

          SECOND: The Plan was duly approved by the shareholders of each foreign
               constituent  corporation  in the merger  pursuant  to the laws of
               each such corporation's  state of incorporation and each domestic
               constituent  corporation  has complied with  sections  23B.11.010
               through 23B.11.040 of the Act.

          THIRD: The  shareholders  of  each  domestic  constituent  corporation
               approved  the  Plan  by  their   unanimous   written  consent  in
               accordance with section 23B.07.040(1)(a)(i) of the Act.

         DATED as of November _____, 1998.
                                                 ISG RESOURCES, INC.,
                                                 a Utah corporation

                                                 By:
                                                    --------------------------
                                                       R Steve Creamer
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                                       (An officer's title)
#### STATE OF FLORIDA v CALL

Case No. 85-036-562-MV-3-4

County Court, Sarasota County

October 3, 1985

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Bruce Neumann, Assistant State Attorney, for plaintiff.

Regina W. Cosper, Assistant Public Defender, for defendant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

BECKY A. TITUS, County Judge.

THIS CAUSE was heard before the Court on oral motion in limine *22to exclude the results of the breath test taken in connection with Defendant’s arrest for DUI. Upon the testimony presented, the Court finds the facts to be as follows:

1. Defendant was not observed for 20 continuous minutes prior to the taking of his breath sample as required under HRS Rule 10D-42.24(l)(f). The Court declines to include in the 20 minute period the time during which Defendant was being transferred in the patrol car, as urged by the State. The circumstances surrounding the transportation of the Defendant, who was seated alone in the back seat of a dark patrol car, separated from the arresting officer by a Plexiglas window, cannot reasonably be construed to permit observation.

*CONCLUSION*

The foregoing noncompliance was substantial. The visual observation period is required in order to detect the ingestion of any material by mouth or regurgitation of any material into the mouth, thus causing a contamination of the sample. Rule 10D-42.24(l)(f) specifically requires the officer to *“make certain*the subject has not taken anything by mouth or has not regurgitated for *at least*twenty minutes before administering the test” [emphasis added]. Rule 10D-42.24 sets forth the minimum preliminary procedures to be followed for all approved chemical breath tests. Indeed, the failure to comply with the 20 minute observation requirement is one of the omissions considered serious enough that it could lead to loss of the permit of the technician or loss of registration of the instrument or both. HRS Rule 10D-42.24(l)(g).

Blood alcohol test results in DUI cases, as in the instant case, can give rise to a presumption of guilt under F. S. 316.1934. No other evidence introduced in any criminal case carries with it a jury instruction which simultaneously destroys the presumption of innocence as to the entire crime charged and substitutes a presumption of guilt. It is vitally important, therefore, that the test be taken “substantially in accordance with rules and regulations” of the Department of HRS, which rules “shall specify precisely” the approved tests and “shall provide an approved method of administration which shall be followed in all tests given. . .” F. S. 316.1932(f)(1).

The failure to observe the Defendant for 20 minutes pursuant to HRS Rule 10D-42.24(l)(f) is a substantial noncompliance under F. S. 316.1932(f)(1). The risk of contamination of the sample, considering the serious consequences at stake, require exclusion of the evidence in this case.

Upon the foregoing, it is hereby

*23ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion in limine is granted.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of October, 1985.
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001.

                           ---------------------------


In connection with the Quarterly Report of NORD OIL INTERNATIONAL, INC.(the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jean-Francois Amyot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  November 28, 2005


        /s/ Jean-Francois Amyot
        ---------------------------------
        Jean-Francois Amyot,
        Chief Executive Officer
1

Sutton, Lisa

From: Conroy, David

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 12:11 PM

To: Doug McVay; barbara.morin@dem.ri.gov

Cc: Arnold, Anne; Moraff, Kenneth; Hamjian, Lynne; Simcox, Alison

Subject: SSM SIP Call Final Rule 

Doug:

This message is a follow‐up to my voice message earlier today notifying you about the final action the EPA

Administrator signed today to ensure states have in place air pollution rules that apply to sources at all times,

including when the source is operating during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction (SSM).  

This action responds to a Petition for Rulemaking filed by the Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians concerning

the treatment of excess emissions at industrial facilities during SSM operations, specifically how those

emissions are treated in state implementation plan (SIP) provisions that the EPA previously approved. Also, as

part of this action, EPA has revised and clarified its policy concerning SSM provisions consistent with the Clean

Air Act.

The EPA is calling for 36 states, including your state, to make changes to their SIPs, to protect public health

and ensure consistency with the Clean Air Act and the EPA’s current SSM Policy.  Your state will have 18

months to submit revisions of your state plan to EPA. Your state’s revised SIP is due to EPA by November 22,

2016.  

As part of our notification to your state about this final SIP call, I have attached to this email a letter from the

EPA’s Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, Janet McCabe.  

To inform you of the details on the final action, including the specific SIP provisions your state needs to

address, I have attached a pre‐publication version of the action and final fact sheet.   These will be posted on

our website at:  http://www.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/emissions.html.

The EPA will continue to work closely with you to ensure the SIP revision process is as efficient as possible.  If

you or your staff have questions, please contact Anne Arnold, 617‐918‐1047.

David Conroy

Air Programs Branch

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1
2

Office: 617‐918‐1661

iPhone: 857‐829‐8239

Fax: 617‐918‐0661
# The Attorney General ofTexas
FM 23, 1978 JOHN L.HILL Attorney General
Honorable Chet Brooks, Chairman Committee onHuman Resources Senate Chamber Austin, Texas Opinion No.I-I-12.X Re: Authority of members of Board of Texas Department of Health to enter and inspect nursing homes. Dear Senator Brooks: You have requested our opinion regarding the authority of individual members ofthe State Board of Health to enter andinspect nursing homes. The State Board ofHealth iscomposed of 18members appointed by the Governor. V.T.C.S. art. 4415a. The Board isempowered to employ a Director of the State Department of Public Health, and to investigate the conduct of the work of the Department. V.T.C.S. art. 4418a. The Department, as the licensing agency charged with the duty ofregulating nursing andconvalescent homes, isauthorized to “make such inspections and investigations” of those facilities “asit deems necessary.” V.T.C.S. art. 4442~. Weneed not reach the issue of whether article 4442~ would permit an individual Board member to make inspections of nursing and convalescent homes in the absence of authorization by a majority of the Board, since article 4420, V.T.C.S., enacted in1909,empowers

members of the State Board of Health or any person authorized by them, upon presentation of proper authority in writing

. . . whenever they may deem it necessary in pursuance of their duties, to enter into, examine, investigate, inspect and view any ground, public building, factory, slaughter house, packing house, abattoir, dairy, bakery, manufactory, hotel, restaurant and m other public place and building where they deem it proper to enter for the discovery and suppression of disease and for the enforcement of the rules of the sanitary code for Texas and of any health law, sanitary law or quarantine regulation of this State.

p. 4598Honorable Chet Brooks - Page 2 (B-~26)

(Emphasis added). It is apparent that article 4420 uses the term “public place” to refer to any location which is affected with 8 public interest. In our cpinion, therefore, amember ofthe State Board ofHealth isauthorized to make inspections and investigations ofnursing and convalescent homes pursuant to article 4420. See Attorney General Opinion O-9919(1945)(authority under article 4420 to inspz convalescent homes). SUMMARY

A member of the State Board of Health is authorized to make inspections and investigations ofnursing and convalescent homes pursuant toarticle 4420, V.T.C.S. Verytruly yours,

APPROVED: ‘9

DAVIDM.KENDALL, First Assistant

C.ROBERT HEATH, Chairman Opinion Committee jst

p. 4599
§ 1918.64 Powered conveyors. ( a ) *Emergency stop.* Readily accessible stop controls shall be provided for use in an emergency. Whenever the operation of any power conveyor requires personnel to work close to the conveyor, the conveyor controls shall not be left unattended while the conveyor is in operation.
( b ) *Guarding.* All conveyor and trimmer drives that create a hazard shall be adequately guarded.
( c ) *Approved for location.* Electric motors and controls on conveyors and trimmers used to handle grain and exposed to grain dust shall be of a type approved by a nationally recognized testing laboratory for use in Class II, Division I locations. (See § 1910.7 of this chapter.)
( d ) *Grain trimmer control box.* Each grain trimmer shall have a control box on the weather deck close to the spout feeding the trimmer.
( e ) *Grain trimmer power cable.* Power cables between the deck control box and the grain trimmer shall be used only in continuous lengths without splice or tap between connections.
( f ) *Portable conveyors.* Portable conveyors shall be stable within their operating ranges. When used at variable fixed levels, the unit shall be secured at the operating level.
( g ) *Delivery and braking.* When necessary for the safety of employees, provisions shall be made for braking objects at the delivery end of the conveyor.
( h ) *Electric brakes.* Conveyors using electrically released brakes shall be constructed so that the brakes cannot be released until power is applied and the brakes are automatically engaged if the power fails or the operating control is returned to the “stop” position.
( i ) *Starting powered conveyors.* Powered conveyors shall not be started until all employees are clear of the conveyor or have been warned that the conveyor is about to start up.
( j ) *Loading and unloading.* The area around conveyor loading and unloading points shall be kept clear of obstructions during conveyor operations.
( k ) *Lockout/tagout.* ( 1 ) Conveyors shall be stopped and their power sources locked out and tagged out during maintenance, repair, and servicing. If power is necessary for testing or for making minor adjustments, power shall only be supplied to the servicing operation.
( 2 ) The starting device shall be locked out and tagged out in the stop position before an attempt is made to remove the cause of a jam or overload of the conveying medium.
( l ) *Safe practices.* ( 1 ) Only designated persons shall operate, repair or service powered conveyors.
( 2 ) The employer shall ensure that each employee stays off operating conveyors.
( 3 ) Conveyors shall be operated only with all overload devices, guards and safety devices in place and operable.
Base Salary and 2009 Annual Cash Bonus Opportunity Percentage for Mr. Saltiel.


 Exhibit 10.1 
  

							
	 Executive Officer
	  	New Base
Salary	  	2009 Annual Cash
Bonus Opportunity
Percentage	 
			
	 Robert J. Saltiel
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
	  	$	475,000	  	80	%
§ 61.17 Temporary certificate. ( a ) A temporary pilot, flight instructor, or ground instructor certificate or rating is issued for up to 120 days, at which time a permanent certificate will be issued to a person whom the Administrator finds qualified under this part.
( b ) A temporary pilot, flight instructor, or ground instructor certificate or rating expires: ( 1 ) On the expiration date shown on the certificate;
( 2 ) Upon receipt of the permanent certificate; or
( 3 ) Upon receipt of a notice that the certificate or rating sought is denied or revoked.
§ 1919.60 General duties, exemptions. ( a ) The requirements of subpart H of this part shall be strictly observed: *Provided, however,* That in cases of practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship, the Assistant Secretary in his discretion may grant exemptions or variations from any provision in that subpart.
( b ) Except as otherwise noted in this part, all functions required by subpart H of this part shall be carried out by or under the supervision of a person accredited for the purpose or by his authorized representative.
( c ) All required unit proof load tests shall be carried out by the use of weights as a dead load. Only where this is not possible may dynamometers or other recording test equipment be used. Any such recording test equipment owned by an accredited person shall have been tested for accuracy within the 6 months next preceding application for accreditation or renewal thereof. Such test shall be performed with calibrating equipment which has been checked in turn so that indications are traceable to the National Bureau of Standards. A copy of test reports shall accompany the accreditation application. Where test equipment is not the property of the accredited person, that person shall not issue any certificate based upon the use of such equipment unless its owner has made available a certificate of accuracy based on the requirements of this paragraph obtained within the year prior to such use, and stating the errors of the equipment. In any event, reasonable standards of accuracy shall be met and proof loads adjusted as necessary.
( d ) The qualifications of any person appointed or recognized by any accredited person for the purpose of carrying out certification functions shall meet with the approval of the Assistant Secretary.
( e ) Sections 1919.10(e) and (g) and 1919.11 shall govern, to the extent applicable, persons accredited under subpart F of this part.
#### § 1915.1002 Coal tar pitch volatiles; interpretation of term.

Note:

The requirements applicable to shipyard employment under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1002 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-1910.1002).

[[61 FR 31430](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31430), June 20, 1996]
?

?

?

?

?

?

?
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer
of Kyocera Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: June 29, 2011



/S/    SHOICHI
AOKIName:

Shoichi AokiTitle:

Director, Managing Executive Officerand General Manager ofCorporate Financial & Business Administration Group(Principal Financial Officer)
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

April 13, 2017

Before

DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

No. 16

‐ 1693

SHERRY ANICICH,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellant

,

v.

HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., et al.,

Defendants

‐ Appellees

. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of

Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 14 C 7125

Jorge L. Alonso

, J udge

.

O R D E R

The court hereby AMENDS footnote 4 on page 9 of the slip opinion issued on

March 24, 2017, to read as follows:

4 Home Depot asserts in its brief that Illinois businesses employ “thousands” of

such people. We hope this insult to the character of Illinois workers and to the judgment

of their managers was just an ill

‐ advised exaggeration. For its part, Grand frames the case

in terms of whether it had an obligation to control Alisha’s behavior. This offensive

assumption that the victim’s behavior was the problem is at best flatly contrary to the

Rule 12(b)(6) standard.
# EUR-Lex - 31997R2092 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31997R2092

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2092/97 of 24 October 1997 amending Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 on rules of application (cereals sector import duties) for Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 **

*
Official Journal L 292 , 25/10/1997 P. 0010 - 0010 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2092/97 of 24 October 1997 amending Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 on rules of application (cereals sector import duties) for Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organization of the market in cereals (1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 923/96 (2), and in particular Article 10 (4) thereof,

Whereas, in the light of the exceptional situation on the durum wheat market forecast for the 1997/98 wheat marketing year, adjustments should be made to the import arrangements for this product until the end of the 1997/98 marketing year in order to alleviate the current difficult situation on the market;

Whereas these adjustments concern the minimum vitreous grain content of durum wheat which is one of the quality standards to be met on importation referred to in Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 (3), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 641/97 (4); whereas, therefore, Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 should be amended;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1249/96, '75,0` specified for durum wheat falling within CN code 1001 10 for classification standard No 4 (minimum vitreous grain percentage) is replaced by '62,0` until 30 June 1998 inclusive.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 1997.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 181, 1. 7. 1992, p. 21.

(2) OJ L 126, 24. 5. 1996, p. 37.

(3) OJ L 161, 29. 6. 1996, p. 125.

(4) OJ L 98, 15. 4. 1997, p. 2.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4898 

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend the period during 

which States, Indian Tribes, and local governments may use Coronavirus 

Relief Fund payments. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2020 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself and Ms. HASSAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend 

the period during which States, Indian Tribes, and local 

governments may use Coronavirus Relief Fund payments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PERIOD TO USE CORONAVIRUS 

4 RELIEF FUND PAYMENTS. 

5 Section 601(d)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 801(d)(3)) is amended by striking ‘‘December 30, 

7 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2021’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 31997D0126 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31997D0126

**97/126/EC: Council Decision of 6 December 1996 concerning the conclusion of an agreement between the European Community, of the one part, and the Government of Denmark and the Home Government of the Faroe Islands, of the other part **

*
Official Journal L 053 , 22/02/1997 P. 0001 - 0001 *

COUNCIL DECISION of 6 December 1996 concerning the conclusion of an agreement between the European Community, of the one part, and the Government of Denmark and the Home Government of the Faroe Islands, of the other part (97/126/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community and in particular Article 113 in conjunction with the first sentence of Article 228 (2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas the Commission has negotiated on behalf of the Community a new agreement, replacing the Agreement between the European Economic Community of the one part and the Government of Denmark and the Home Government of the Faroe Islands of the other part (1), signed on 2 December 1991, as amended by the Agreement (2) in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community of the one part and the Government of Denmark and the Home Government of the Faroe Islands of the other part, signed on 8 March 1995,

Whereas this new Agreement should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement between the European Community, of the one part, and the Government of Denmark and the Home Government of the Faroe Islands, of the other part, is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorized to designate the persons empowered to sign the Agreement in order to bind the Community and to give the notification provided for in Article 40 of the Agreement.

Done at Brussels, 6 December 1996.

For the Council

The President

D. SPRING

(1) OJ No L 371, 31. 12. 1991, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 54, 10. 3. 1995, p. 25.