alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31998R2258 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998R2258

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2258/98 of 20 October 1998 laying down special measures derogating from Regulation (EEC) No 3719/88 as regards products processed from fruit and vegetables **

*
Official Journal L 283 , 21/10/1998 P. 0010 - 0010 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2258/98 of 20 October 1998 laying down special measures derogating from Regulation (EEC) No 3719/88 as regards products processed from fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the markets in processed fruit and vegetable products (1), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2199/97 (2), and in particular Articles 16(8) and 29 thereof,

Whereas the problems on the Russian market since September have seriously damaged exporters' economic interests and the resulting situation has seriously affected the opportunities for exports;

Whereas, under the circumstances and notwithstanding Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3719/88 of 16 November 1988 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences and advance fixing certificates for agricultural products (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1044/98 (4), holders of export licences with advance fixing of the refund valid on 1 September 1998 should be allowed, until the end of January 1999 and provided that Russia is one of the destinations mentioned on the licence, to return them to the issuing body with a view to recovering the corresponding security in full;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Processed Fruit and Vegetables,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Notwithstanding Article 33 of Regulation (EEC) No 3719/88, the securities relating to export licences for products processed from fruit and vegetables with advance fixing of the refund on which Russia is one of the stipulated destinations, which were valid on 1 September 1998 and which were or are returned to the issuing body no later than 31 January 1999, shall be released in full for the quantities not exported.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 October 1998.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 297, 21. 11. 1996, p. 29.

(2) OJ L 303, 6. 11. 1997, p. 1.

(3) OJ L 331, 2. 12. 1988, p. 1.

(4) OJ L 149, 20. 5. 1998, p. 11.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice 00-052] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Life and Microgravity Sciences and Applications Advisory Committee, NASA-NIH Advisory Subcommittee on Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 

# DATES:

Thursday, June 8, 2000, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Headquarters, 300 E Street, SW, MIC-3, Room 3H46, Washington, DC 20546. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Joan Vernikos, Code UL, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-0220. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as follows: 

—Action Status 

—NASA Update 

—NASA Life Sciences Division Update 

—LSAS and LMSAAC Reports 

—NIH/NASA Program Announcement 

—Joint Workshops Update 

—NASA/NIH Three-Dimensional Tissue Culture Center 

—Discussions and Review of Findings and Recommendations 

It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. 

Visitors will be requested to sign a visitor's register. 

Dated: May 9, 2000.

Matthew M. Crouch, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

[FR Doc. 00-12051 Filed 5-12-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 1:52 PM

To: 'djaques@mekennalong.com'; 'mmckinnon@mckennalong.com'; 'mclark@mckennalong.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Petition for Exemption: Pacific Gas and Election Company (FAA-2015-0708)



### May 18, 2015

Dear Mr. Jaques.:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0708). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make, mode l, and type (i.e. - fixed-wing, ro torcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description shoul d include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by June 1, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
#### § 1471.985 Person.

*Person* means any individual, corporation, partnership, association, unit of government, or legal entity, however organized.
#### § 65.41 Skill requirements: Facility ratings.

Each applicant for a facility rating at an air traffic control tower must have passed a practical test on each item listed in § 65.37 of this part that is applicable to each operating position at the control tower at which the rating is sought.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30228

ROYAL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v. DREDGING SUPPLY COMPANY,

Defendant - Third Party Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,

Third Party Defendant - Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans 01-CV-1224-M

-------------------- January 3, 2003 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appellant appeals from the summary judgment decision of the district court dismissing its claims against appellee. Specifically, appellant contends that the district court erred by using the complaint-allegation rule. See, e.g., Selective Ins.2

Co. of Southeast v. J.B. Mouton & Sons, Inc. , 954 F.2d 1075, 1078 (5th Cir. 1992) (applying Louisiana law and employing its complaint-allegation rule). Appellant also complains that the district court erred in finding that the complaint was limited in a manner that did not impose liability on appellee. We have considered the briefs and the arguments advanced by the parties at oral argument and we find no error in the district court’s determination as reflected in its order dismissing claims against appellee. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
**Exhibit 15.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-84904, 33-98132, 33-99134, 33-99140, 33-99150, 33-99154, 333-109200, 333-118678, 333-127976 and 333-138316) of our report dated June 28, 2007 relating to the financial statements, financial statementschedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting which appear in Kyocera’s Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the yearended March 31, 2007. 

/s/ Kyoto Audit Corporation 

KyotoAudit Corporation 

Kyoto, Japan 

October 5, 2007
**Exhibit
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Financial Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
      D. Cahill, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
                Richard R. SawyerRichard
                R. SawyerChief
                Financial Officer and SecretaryAugust
                8, 2007
**Exhibit 23.1**

** **

July 12, 2005

 

 

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

450 5th Street N.W

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Ladies/Gentlemen,

 
| Re. Kenilworth Systems Corporation                    |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Form 10-K/A, Amendment No.1, y/e* *12/31/04 |

 

We concur with the restated financial statements contained therein and,audited by us. The original Form 10-K contained unaudited financialstatements. Our audit for the period ended December 31, 2004 of therestated financial statements was not completed until June 17, 2005.

 

 
| /s/ Demetrius & Company, L.L.C. |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                     |
| JAD:jad                                  |

 

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 1926

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.1422 Signals—hand signal chart.

Hand signal charts must be either posted on the equipment or conspicuously posted in the vicinity of the hoisting operations.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dov Baharav, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Amdocs Limited;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

          (b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions
     contained in SEC Release 34-47986]

          (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls
     and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
     the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting;
     and

     5. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
     or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal
     control over financial reporting.

Date: December 24, 2003

/s/  DOV BAHARAV
---------------------------------------------------------
Dov Baharav,
Chief Executive Officer,
Amdocs Management Limited
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Kyocera Corporation
(the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2007 as amended by this Form 20F/A (Amendment No. 1) (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 5, 2007



/s/ Makoto KawamuraName:

Makoto KawamuraTitle:

President and Representative Director(Principal Executive Officer)
filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The district court stayed the action, finding

that the 11 U.S.C. § 362 automatic bankruptcy stay applied and that the amount of the underlying obligation was uncertain because of the bankruptcy litigation.

As to the automatic bankruptcy stay, the stay is generally applicable to the debtor only, not a guarantor. See In re PTI Holding Corp., 346 B.R. 820, 833-34 (Bankr. 

### D. Nev. 2006); Edwards v. Ghandour, 123 Nev. 105, 113-14 & n.10, 159 P.3d 1086, 1091-92 & n.10 (2007)(explaining that the automatic bankruptcy stay does not apply to codebtors and guarantors), abrogated on other grounds by Five Star Capital Corp. v. Ruby, 124 Nev. 1048, 1053-54, 194 P.3d 709, 712-13 (2008); Mfrs. & Traders Trust Co. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 94 Nev. 551, 556, 583 P.2d 444, 447 (1978) (holding that a guaranty is a contract separate from the underlying debt obligation), overruled on unrelated grounds by First Interstate Bank of Nev. v. Shields, 102 Nev. 616, 730 P.2d 429 (1986). As to the uncertainty of the underlying obligation in the bankruptcy case, the discharge or partial payment of the debt in bankruptcy by itself will not diminish the amounts owed by the guarantor, the district court has not made any findings or conclusions of law that the terms of the guaranty contract will be satisfied by payment or discharge through bankruptcy, and should the guarantor be required to satisfy the debtor's debt under the guaranty contract, the guarantor will be subrogated to the petitioner's rights in the bankruptcy. See In re Harvey Cole Co., 2 B.R. 517, 520 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 1980) (noting that "the creditor thus has a right, unaffected by bankruptcy, to turn to the guarantor for satisfaction of a debt," and the guarantor then becomes subrogated to the rights of the creditor against the debtor).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2

### Accordingly, having considered the parties arguments and the

appendices, we conclude that the district court improperly granted the stay, and we

ORDER the petition GRANTED AND DIRECT THE CLERK OF THIS COURT TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS instructing the district court to vacate its order staying the litigation.

r4v-S" Dougla

(1.444• ■■ ••• ■■ •• ■ *41.. 

### Saitta

cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge Dubowsky Law Office, Chtd. Gunderson Law Firm Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 

### 3
#### § 1626.5 Where to submit complaints and charges.

Complaints and charges may be made through the EEOC's designated digital systems, in person, by telephone, by facsimile, or by mail to any EEOC office or any designated representative of the Commission. The current addresses of the EEOC's offices appear at *www.eeoc.gov.*

[85 FR 65219, Oct. 15, 2020]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration

Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, the 110th open meeting of the full Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans will be held Friday, June 2, 2000 in Room N-5437 A-D, U.S. Department of Labor Building, Third and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210.

The purpose of the meeting, which will begin at 1:30 p.m. and end at approximately 3 p.m., is for the three working groups to provide progress reports on their topics of study and for the Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration to update members on current employee benefit activities.

Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement pertaining to any topics the Council elected to study for the year by submitting 20 copies on or before May 26, 2000 to Sharon Morrissey, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, U.S. Department of Labor, Suite N-5677, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210.

Individuals or representatives of organizations wishing to address the Advisory Council should forward their requests to the Executive Secretary or telephone (202) 219-8753. Oral presentations will be limited to ten minutes, time permitting, but an extended statement may be submitted for the record. Individuals with disabilities, who need special accommodations, should contact Sharon Morrissey by May 26 at the address indicated.

Organizations or individuals may also submit statements for the record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statements should be sent to the Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at the above address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record of the meeting if received on or before May 26, 2000.

Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of May 2000.

Leslie Kramerich,

Acting Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-12404  Filed 5-16-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Abraham Gatner, Appellant.

Argued April 29, 1937;

decided May 25, 1937.

*558
      *William Copeland Dodge, District Attorney (Philip*A. *Donahue*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.