alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1915.172 Portable air receivers and other unfired pressure vessels. ( a ) Portable, unfired pressure vessels, built after the effective date of this regulation, shall be marked and reported indicating that they have been designed and constructed to meet the standards of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Rules for Construction of Unfired Pressure Vessels, 1963. They shall be subjected to a hydrostatic pressure test of one and one-half times the working pressure of the vessels.
( b ) Portable, unfired pressure vessels, not built to the code requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, and built prior to the effective date of this regulation, shall be examined quarterly by a competent person. They shall be subjected yearly to a hydrostatic pressure test of one and one-half times the working pressure of the vessels.
( c ) The relief valves on the portable, unfired pressure vessels in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section shall be set to the safe working pressure of the vessels, or set to the lowest safe working pressure of the systems, whichever is lower.
( d ) A certification record of such examinations and tests made in compliance with the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section shall be maintained. The certification record shall include the date of examinations and tests, the signature of the person who performed the examinations or tests and the serial number, or other identifier, of the equipment examined and tested.
[47 FR 16986, Apr. 20, 1982, as amended at 51 FR 34562, Sept. 29, 1986; 67 FR 44545, July 3, 2002]
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4971 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 229 Minnetonka Avenue South in Wayzata, 

Minnesota, as the ‘‘Jim Ramstad Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 4971 ES

1 SECTION 1. JIM RAMSTAD POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 229 Minnetonka Avenue South 

4 in Wayzata, Minnesota, shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘Jim Ramstad Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jim Ramstad Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the Senate December 17, 2020. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4971 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostRamstad Post Office’’. South in Wayzata, Minnesota, as the ‘‘Jim al Service located at 229 Minnetonka Avenue
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 21, 1999, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Exxon Research & Engineering Company (“ER&E”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are Exxon Research and Engineering Company, Florham Park, NJ; Phillips Petroleum Company, Bartlesville, OK; Sunoco, Inc., Philadelphia, PA; Mobil Technology Company, Paulsboro, NJ; Conoco, Inc., Ponca City, OK; CITGO, Corpus Christi, TX; and BP-Amoco Oil International, Ltd., Middlesex, United Kingdom. The nature an objectives of the venture are the development of guidelines for carbon steel metallurgy and welding procedures for HF alkylations plants. Participation in this project will remain open until issuance of the final project report. The participants intend to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-12043  Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### § 1470.2 Scope of subpart.

This subpart contains general rules pertaining to this part and procedures for control of exceptions from this part.
#### § 1908.4 Offsite consultation.

The State may provide consultative services to employers on occupational safety and health issues by telephone and correspondence, and at locations other than the employer's worksite, such as the consultation project offices. It may, under limited conditions specified by the Assistant Secretary, include training and education.
#### § 1650.113 Non-waiver of rights by payments.

An employee's payment of all or any portion of a debt collected by salary offset will not be construed as a waiver of any right the employee may have under 5 U.S.C. 5514 or any other provision of contract or law, unless there are statutory or contractual provisions to the contrary.
# EUR-Lex - 31998D0591 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998D0591

**98/591/EC: Council Decision of 13 October 1998 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America **

*
Official Journal L 284 , 22/10/1998 P. 0035 - 0036 *

COUNCIL DECISION of 13 October 1998 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America (98/591/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 130m, in conjunction with the first sentence of Article 228(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 228(3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Whereas the European Community and the United States of America are pursuing specific RTD programmes in areas of common interest;

Whereas, on the basis of past experience, both sides have expressed a desire to establish a deeper and broader framework for the conduct of collaboration in science and technology;

Whereas the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation forms part of the global cooperation between the European Community and the United States of America as reflected, in particular, in the New Transatlantic Agenda, adopted by both sides in December 1995;

Whereas, by its Decision of 25 June 1996, the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate an agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America;

Whereas, by its Decision of 1 December 1997, the Council decided that the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation be signed on behalf of the European Community;

Whereas the said Agreement was signed on 5 December 1997;

Whereas the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

Pursuant to Article 12 of the Agreement, the President of the Council shall give notification that the procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Agreement have been completed on the part of the Community.

Done at Luxembourg, 13 October 1998.

For the Council

The President

C. EINEM

(1) OJ C 162, 28. 5. 1998, p. 10.

(2) Opinion delivered on 7 October 1998 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A,
Amendment No. 3 of Gateway Distributors, Ltd. for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2004, I, Richard A. Bailey, Chief Financial Officer of Gateway
Distributors, Ltd., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.     Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A, Amendment No. 3 for the fiscal
year ending December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.     The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A,
Amendment No. 3 for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004, fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Gateway Distributors, Ltd.

     Dated: November 8, 2006.

                                        /s/  Richard A. Bailey
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Richard A. Bailey, Chief Financial
                                        Officer of Gateway Distributors, Ltd.
#### The Seitz Estates, Inc., Respondent, *v.*Medico Brothers, Inc., Appellant.

(Submitted June 5, 1936;

decided July 8, 1936.)

*494
      *Oscar L. Spears*for appellant.

*Robert L. Redfield, Jr.,*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
#### GIBSON v. THE STATE.

(Decided December 19, 1916.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. A. H. Alston.

No counsel marked for appellant.

W. L. Martin, Attorney General, and Harwell G. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Evans, J.

No bill of exceptions and no error of record. Affirmed.
#### § 27.961 Fuel system hot weather operation.

Each suction lift fuel system and other fuel systems with features conducive to vapor formation must be shown by test to operate satisfactorily (within certification limits) when using fuel at a temperature of 110 °F under critical operating conditions including, if applicable, the engine operating conditions defined by § 27.927 (b)(1) and (b)(2).

[Amdt. 27-23, 53 FR 34212, Sept. 2, 1988]
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES--OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Baron Capital Properties, L.P.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert L. Astorino, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes--Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      May 29, 2003

                                       BARON CAPITAL PROPERTIES, L.P.


                                       By:  /s/ Robert L. Astorino
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Robert L. Astorino
                                          Chief Executive Officer


                                       54
#### § 18.411 Liability insurance.

Evidence that a person was or was not insured against liability is not admissible upon the issue whether the person acted negligently or otherwise wrongfully. This rule does not require the exclusion of evidence of insurance against liability when offered for another purpose, such as proof of agency, ownership, or control, or bias or prejudice of a witness.
AFS-15-962-E April 5, 2016

Exemption No. 16065 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0780

Mr. Chris Webb National Chief Flight Instructor American Flyers 4659 Airport Parkway Addison, TX 75001

Dear Mr. Webb:

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our decision and explains its basis.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated March 26, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of American Flyers for an exemption from § 61.65(i) and (i)(4) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow American Flyers to use the American Flyers Precision Flight Contro ls (PFC) Model CR-12 and CR-12 ProPanel Advanced Aviation Training Devices (AATD) for a maximum credit of 20 hours for the instrument rating without a view-limiting device worn by an applicant when logging

instrument time in an AATD.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because this is not a precedent-setting petition, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to American Flyer.

The FAA issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 12096 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that the petitioner was not substantially different from other similar regulated entities that use AATDs for pilot training and experience requirements.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—2

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed Denial of Exemption No. 12096;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed Denial of Exemption No. 12096 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest.

The FAA is cognizant of the recent increased capabilities of AATDs and is working to develop new rulemaking that would increase the regulatory allowances for AATD credit. This proposal was published in the Federal Register for public review and comment on June 16, 2015 (Docket No.: FAA–2015–1846; Notice No.15–03, Aviation Training Device Credit for Pilot Certification ).

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby deny the petition of American Flyers for an exemption from 14 CFR § 61.65(i) and (i)(4).

Sincerely,

//s//

John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosure Exemption No. 12096
Editorial Note on Subpart Z of Part 1910
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1910 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1910.1201 Retention of DOT markings, placards and labels. ( a ) Any employer who receives a package of hazardous material which is required to be marked, labeled or placarded in accordance with the U. S. Department of Transportation's Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR Parts 171 through 180) shall retain those markings, labels and placards on the package until the packaging is sufficiently cleaned of residue and purged of vapors to remove any potential hazards.
( b ) Any employer who receives a freight container, rail freight car, motor vehicle, or transport vehicle that is required to be marked or placarded in accordance with the Hazardous Materials Regulations shall retain those markings and placards on the freight container, rail freight car, motor vehicle or transport vehicle until the hazardous materials which require the marking or placarding are sufficiently removed to prevent any potential hazards.
( c ) Markings, placards and labels shall be maintained in a manner that ensures that they are readily visible.
( d ) For non-bulk packages which will not be reshipped, the provisions of this section are met if a label or other acceptable marking is affixed in accordance with the Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200).
( e ) For the purposes of this section, the term “hazardous material” and any other terms not defined in this section have the same definition as in the Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR Parts 171 through 180).
[59 FR 36700, July 19, 1994]
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  23 LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended
September  30,  2006, as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the  undersigned,
Robert  P.  Johnson, President of AEI Fund Management XXI,  Inc.,
the  Managing Member of the Company, and Patrick W. Keene,  Chief
Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc., each certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              November 6, 2006



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              November 6, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1231]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board; Public 
Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration National Small Business 
Development Center Advisory Board will hold a public meeting on Sunday, 
February 6, 2000, from 9 am to 4 pm at the Le Richelieu Hotel, New 
Orleans, Louisiana to discuss such matters as may be presented by 
members, staff of the U.S. Small Business Administration, or others 
present.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Please write or call Ellen Thrasher, 
U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW, Fourth Floor, 
Washington, DC 20416, telephone number (202) 205-6817.

Kris Swedin,
Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 00-1231 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### § 252.9 Ventilation systems.

Air carriers shall prohibit smoking whenever the ventilation system is not fully functioning. Fully functioning for this purpose means operating so as to provide the level and quality of ventilation specified and designed by the manufacturer for the number of persons currently in the passenger compartment.
§ 1471.735 Under what conditions do I get an additional opportunity to challenge the facts on which the suspension is based? ( a ) You as a respondent will not have an additional opportunity to challenge the facts if the suspending official determines that— ( 1 ) Your suspension is based upon an indictment, conviction, civil judgment, or other finding by a Federal, State, or local body for which an opportunity to contest the facts was provided;
( 2 ) Your presentation in opposition contains only general denials to information contained in the Notice of Suspension;
( 3 ) The issues raised in your presentation in opposition to the suspension are not factual in nature, or are not material to the suspending official's initial decision to suspend, or the official's decision whether to continue the suspension; or
( 4 ) On the basis of advice from the Department of Justice, an office of the United States Attorney, a State attorney general's office, or a State or local prosecutor's office, that substantial interests of the government in pending or contemplated legal proceedings based on the same facts as the suspension would be prejudiced by conducting fact-finding.
( b ) You will have an opportunity to challenge the facts if the suspending official determines that— ( 1 ) The conditions in paragraph (a) of this section do not exist; and
( 2 ) Your presentation in opposition raises a genuine dispute over facts material to the suspension.
( c ) If you have an opportunity to challenge disputed material facts under this section, the suspending official or designee must conduct additional proceedings to resolve those facts.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Jupiter Marine International
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Lawrence Tierney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: October 26, 2004

/s/ Lawrence Tierney
--------------------
Lawrence Tierney
Chief Financial Officer