alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

No. 116,943

In the Matter of HARRY LOUIS NAJIM,

Respondent.

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

On December 1, 2017, this court indefinitely suspended the respondent Harry 

Louis Najim's license to practice law in Kansas retroactive to the May 15, 2015, order of 

temporary suspension. The court further ordered that the respondent undergo a 

reinstatement hearing under Supreme Court Rule 219(d) (2017 Kan. S. Ct. R. 263) prior 

to its consideration of any petition for reinstatement filed under Supreme Court Rule 

219(b). In re Najim, 307 Kan. 76, 405 P.3d 1223 (2017). 

On November 19, 2018, the respondent filed a petition for reinstatement. The 

Disciplinary Administrator agreed that sufficient time had passed for the court to

reconsider the suspension order. The court then ordered the Disciplinary Administrator to 

conduct an investigation of the facts alleged in the petition for reinstatement and the 

respondent's conduct since the court suspended the respondent's license. See Rule 

219(d)(2) (2019 Kan. S. Ct. R. 270). The court further ordered that upon completion of 

the Disciplinary Administrator's investigation, the respondent appear for a reinstatement 

hearing before a hearing panel appointed by the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys 

and that the reinstatement matter proceed pursuant to Rule 219. The court has since 

received the final hearing report detailing the panel's findings in support of its 

recommendation for reinstatement. 

After careful consideration and a thorough review of the final hearing report, the 

court finds the respondent's license to practice law in Kansas courts should be reinstated. 
2

The court further finds such reinstatement should be conditioned upon the respondent's 

compliance with the annual continuing legal education requirements and upon his 

payment of all fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas 

Continuing Legal Education Commission. See Supreme Court Rule 208 (adopted April 

25, 2019) (attorney registration); Supreme Court Rule 811(b) (2019 Kan. S. Ct. R. 553) 

(continuing legal education).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the respondent's license to practice law in Kansas 

is reinstated, conditioned upon the respondent's compliance with the annual continuing 

legal education requirements and upon his payment of all fees required by the Clerk of 

the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission. Upon 

receipt of proof of the completion of these conditions, the Clerk is directed to enter the 

respondent's name on the roster of attorneys actively engaged in the practice of law in 

Kansas.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order be published in the official Kansas Reports 

and that the costs herein be assessed to the respondent. 

Dated this 11th day of September, 2019.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Gregory T. Lucier, Chief Executive Officer of Invitrogen Corporation (the
Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 1, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Gregory T. Lucier  
|                        |  |  |  | Gregory T. Lucier      
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Invitrogen and will be retained by Invitrogen and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 26, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-1282 Lower Tribunal No. 22-11560

________________ 

### City of Miami , Appellant,

vs. 

### Mia Casa, LLC , Appellee.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lourdes Simon, Judge. Victoria Méndez, City Attorney, and Eric J. Eves, Assistant City Attorney, for appellant. Gunster Yoakley & Stewart, P.A., and Amy Brigham Boulris and Michael B. Green, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See City of Miami Beach v. Clevelander Ocean, L.P., 338 So. 3d 16, 23 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (concluding that “competent, substantial evidence support[ed] the decision by the trial court to preserve the status quo pending the final resolution of the issues presented”); see also TJ Mgmt. Grp., L.L.C v. Zidon, 990 So. 2d 623, 625 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (“In considering a request for an injunction, the trial court has wide discretion to grant, deny, modify or dissolve a temporary injunction, and an appellate court will not intercede unless an abuse of discretion has been shown.”); Sun Cruz Casinos, L.L.C v. City of Hollywood, 844 So. 2d 681, 684–85 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (“Although the party raising estoppel must prove the required elements by clear and convincing evidence, the trial court’s findings should not be overturned on appeal unless the findings are clearly erroneous or lacking in evidentiary support.”) (citation omitted); Bruce v. City of Deerfield Beach, 423 So. 2d 404, 406 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (explaining that the concept of administrative exhaustion “is not a strict jurisdictional matter but a flexible concept tailored to the administrative statutes and circumstances”) (quotation omitted).
From: O’Hare, Andrew <AOhare@cement.org>

To: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 10/15/2010 09:37 AM Subject: Another Compliance Deadline Issue

Keith, Another issues has been brought to my attention regarding the effective date/compliance date matter. This involves the requirements for clinker production monitoring requirements, specifically the provisions in Section 63.1350(d)(2). The language in (d)(2), appears to require that these clinker monitoring systems need to be in place within 30 days of the effective date. In PCA’s comments on the proposal, we requested that the Agency clarify this matter and explain that it was 30 days after the COMPLIANCE date, not the effective date. In the EPA response to comments document, excerpt below (page 215), the agency explains that the compliance date is 3 years from the date of promulgation in responding to the comment suggesting that the clinker monitoring requirement be implements 30 days after the COMPLIANCE date. Please let me know if you have any questions. This matter also needs to be addressed in the clarification that you are presently preparing to address the compliance/effective date matter. Regards, And y

Page 215, Comment Response Document
# EUR-Lex - 31996L0042 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996L0042

**Council Directive 96/42/EC of 25 June 1996 amending Directive 77/388/EEC on the common system of value added tax **

*
Official Journal L 170 , 09/07/1996 P. 0034 - 0034 *

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 96/42/EC of 25 June 1996 amending Directive 77/388/EEC on the common system of value added tax

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (2),

Whereas Article 12 (3) (d) of Directive 77/388/EEC (3) lays down that the rules concerning the taxation of agricultural outputs other than those falling within category 1 of Annex H are to be decided unanimously by the Council before 31 December 1994 on a proposal from the Commission; whereas, until that date, those Member States which had already been applying a reduced rate might continue to do so while those applying a standard rate could not apply a reduced rate; whereas that allowed a two-year postponement in the application of the standard rate;

Whereas experience has shown that the structural imbalance in the VAT rates applicable by Member States to agricultural outputs of the floricultural and horticultural sectors has led to reported cases of fraudulent activities; whereas that structural imbalance is a direct result of the application of Article 12 (3) (d) and should be redressed accordingly;

Whereas the most appropriate solution would be to extend to all Member States, on a transitional basis, the option of applying a reduced rate to supplies of agricultural outputs of the floricultural and horticultural sectors and of wood used as firewood,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

Directive 77/388/EEC is hereby amended as follows:

1. Article 12 (3) (d) shall be deleted;

2. the following shall be inserted in Article 28 (2):

'(i) Member States may apply a reduced rate to supplies of live plants (including bulbs, roots and the like, cut flowers and ornamental foliage) and wood for use as firewood.`

Article 2

Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the provisions of domestic law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.

Article 3

This Directive shall apply from 1 January 1995.

Article 4

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 25 June 1996.

For the Council

The President

M. PINTO

(1) OJ No C 17, 22. 1. 1996, p. 26.

(2) OJ No C 236, 11. 9. 1995, p. 10.

(3) OJ No L 145, 13. 6. 1977, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 95/7/EC (OJ No L 102, 5. 5. 1995, p. 18)
§ 1604.3 Separate lines of progression and seniority systems. ( a ) It is an unlawful employment practice to classify a job as “male” or “female” or to maintain separate lines of progression or separate seniority lists based on sex where this would adversely affect any employee unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for that job. Accordingly, employment practices are unlawful which arbitrarily classify jobs so that: ( 1 ) A female is prohibited from applying for a job labeled “male,” or for a job in a “male” line of progression; and vice versa.
( 2 ) A male scheduled for layoff is prohibited from displacing a less senior female on a “female” seniority list; and vice versa.
( b ) A Seniority system or line of progression which distinguishes between “light” and “heavy” jobs constitutes an unlawful employment practice if it operates as a disguised form of classification by sex, or creates unreasonable obstacles to the advancement by members of either sex into jobs which members of that sex would reasonably be expected to perform.
§ 1601.17 Witnesses for public hearings. ( a ) To effectuate the purposes of title VII, the ADA, GINA, and the PWFA, any Commissioner, upon approval of the Commission, may demand in writing that a person appear at a stated time and place within the State in which such person resides, transacts business, or is served with the demand, for the purpose of testifying under oath before the Commission or its representative. If there be noncompliance with any such demand, the Commission may utilize the procedures of section 710 of title VII, the ADA, GINA, and the PWFA to compel such person to testify. A transcript of testimony may be made a part of the record of each investigation.
( b ) Witnesses who testify as provided in paragraph (a) of this section shall be entitled to the same fees and mileage that are paid witnesses in the courts of the United States.
[42 FR 55388, Oct. 14, 1977, as amended at 56 FR 9624, Mar. 7, 1991; 74 FR 63983, Dec. 7, 2009; 89 FR 11169, Feb. 14, 2024; 89 FR 13618, Feb. 23, 2024]
# EUR-Lex - 31998D0012 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998D0012

**98/12/EC: Commission Decision of 15 December 1997 amending for the fourth time Council Directive 82/894/EEC on the notification of animal diseases within the Community and temporarily amending the frequency of notification for bovine spongiform encephalopathy (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 004 , 08/01/1998 P. 0063 - 0063 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 15 December 1997 amending for the fourth time Council Directive 82/894/EEC on the notification of animal diseases within the Community and temporarily amending the frequency of notification for bovine spongiform encephalopathy (Text with EEA relevance) (98/12/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 82/894/EEC of 21 December 1982 on the notification of animal diseases within the Community (1), as last amended by Commission Decision 92/450/EEC (2), and in particular Article 5 (2) thereof,

Whereas outbreaks of bovine spongiform encephalopathy continue within Community territory; whereas that disease should accordingly be kept on the list of diseases notifiable under Directive 82/894/EEC;

Whereas, in the light of experience gained, the requirement to notify outbreaks of that disease should be extended; whereas, as a derogation until 31 December 2002, weekly reporting of outbreaks containing the information normally required for secondary outbreaks appears sufficient;

Whereas provisions adopted previously concerning notification of the disease should be repealed;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

'Bovine spongiform encephalopathy` is hereby added to Annex I to Directive 82/894/EEC.

Article 2

By way of a derogation from Article 3 (1) of Directive 82/894/EEC, all outbreaks of bovine spongiform encephalopathy shall be notified until 31 December 2002 in accordance with Article 4 of that Directive.

Article 3

Decision 92/450/EEC is hereby repealed.

Article 4

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 December 1997.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 378, 31. 12. 1982, p. 58.

(2) OJ L 248, 28. 8. 1992, p. 77.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12292]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 050500C]


Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Council) Groundfish 
Stock Assessment Review (STAR) Panel will hold a work session which is 
open to the public.

DATES: The STAR Panel for lingcod and widow rockfish will meet 
beginning at 8 a.m., June 5, 2000 and continue through June 9, 2000. 
The STAR Panel will meet each day from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The STAR Panel for lingcod and widow rockfish will be held 
in the GSA Conference Room, Federal Building, 777 Sonoma Avenue, Room 
215, Santa Rosa, CA.
    Council address: Pacific Fishery Management Council, 2130 SW Fifth 
Avenue, Suite 224, Portland, OR 97201.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Waldeck, Fishery Management 
Analyst; telephone: (503) 326-6352.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is to review 
draft stock assessment documents for lingcod and widow rockfish and any 
other pertinent information, work with stock assessment teams to make 
necessary revisions, and produce STAR Panel reports for use by the 
Council family and other interested persons.
    Although nonemergency issues not contained in the STAR Panel agenda 
may come before the STAR Panel for discussion, those issues may not be 
the subject of formal panel action during this meeting. STAR Panel 
action will be restricted to those issues specifically listed in this 
notice, and any issues arising after publication of this notice that 
require emergency action under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens 
Fishery Conservation and Management Act, provided the public has been 
notified of the panel's intent to take final action to address the 
emergency.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Mr. John Rhoton at (503) 326-6352 at least 5 days 
prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: May 8, 2000.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 00-12292 Filed 5-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
#### § 1912.31 Experts and consultants.

At the request of an advisory committee or the person calling a meeting of an advisory committee, the Assistant Secretary may make available to the committee any experts or consultants in the field involved. Any expert or consultant so made available may participate in the deliberations of the committee with the consent of the committee.
#### § 1602.52 Commission's remedy for failure to file.

Any institution of higher education failing or refusing to keep records, in accordance with § 1602.48 or § 1602.49 of subpart O of this part, or failing or refusing to file Report EEO-6 when required to do so, in accordance with § 1602.50 of this part, may be compelled to keep records or to file by order of a United States District Court upon application of the Commission, or the Attorney General in a case involving a public institution.
§ 1919.20 Damaged components. ( a ) Pursuant to § 1918.51(b) of this chapter, any derrick or associated permanent fitting which is deformed in service between surveys shall be subjected to proof test to determine its suitability for continued service. If a proof test indicates that the derrick or associated permanent fitting may be continued in service without repair, a note of the existing deformity shall be made on the test certificate. When, in the opinion of the accredited person, it is unsafe to conduct a proof test with an existing deformity, the derrick or associated permanent fitting shall be replaced or repaired and then subjected to proof test in accordance with subpart E of this part.
( b ) Any loose gear components which are injured or deformed by a proof load shall be replaced before a certificate is issued.
( c ) Any derrick, other fixed installation, or associated permanent fitting which is injured or deformed by a proof load shall be replaced or repaired and another proof load test shall be conducted without damage before a certificate is issued.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS - Chief Executive Officer

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of CHINA XINNETWORK MEDIA CORPORATION (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Tremis, President, ChiefExecutive Officer and interim CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

|   | 1. | The      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date:  May 18, 2004

 

|                                                                         |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                         |
| //s  MICHAEL      TREMIS                                           |
|                                                                         |
| Michael Tremis

President and Chief Executive Officer & interim CFO |

 

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the smallbusiness issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.