alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.1116 N-Nitrosodimethylamine.

Note:

The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.1003 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-1910.1003).

[[61 FR 31433](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31433), June 20, 1996]
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: <jschwendeman@firstenergycorp.com>

Date: 7/7/2010 10:20 AM

Subject: Re: Electronic Copy, FE Ext req

Attachments: pic29250.jpg; FE ExtReq.pdf

Greetings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam

electric effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension

requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that

submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date of

your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and

establishes a new date.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic29250.jpg)

 

 From: jschwendeman@firstenergycorp.com 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Date: 07/07/2010 09:56 AM 

 Subject: Electronic Copy, FE Ext req 

Attached for your electronic files is a pdf copy of the FirstEnergy

Corp.

deadline extension request for the Effluent Guidelines ICR

questionnaire.

A hard copy of this request was submitted last week by courier.

(See attached file: FE ExtReq.pdf)

-----------------------------------------

The information contained in this message is intended only for the

personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If

the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an

agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you

are hereby notified that you have received this document in error

and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of

this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete

the original message.(See attached file: FE ExtReq.pdf)
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Annual  Report  on  Form 10-KSB/A,
Amendment  No.  3  of  Gateway  Distributors,  Ltd.  for  the fiscal year ending
December  31,  2005,  I,  Richard  A. Bailey, Chief Financial Officer of Gateway
Distributors,  Ltd.,  hereby  certify  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of  my  knowledge  and  belief,  that:

     1. Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A, Amendment No. 3 for the fiscal year
ending  December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.  The  information  contained  in  such  Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB/A,
Amendment  No.  3 for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005, fairly presents,
in  all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Gateway  Distributors,  Ltd.

     Dated:  November  8,  2006.

                                     /s/  Richard A. Bailey
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                      Richard A. Bailey, Chief Financial Officer
                                      of Gateway Distributors, Ltd.
#### § 1691.7 EEOC dismissals of complaints.

If EEOC determines that the title VII allegations of a joint complaint should be dismissed, EEOC shall notify the complainant and the recipient of the reason for the dismissal and the effect the dismissal has on the complainant's rights under the relevant civil rights provision(s) of the referring agency, and issue a notice of right to sue under title VII. At the same time, EEOC shall transmit to the referring agency a copy of EEOC's file.
#### § 406.155 Offer of proof.

A party whose evidence has been excluded by a ruling of the administrative law judge may offer the evidence for the record on appeal.
#### CORRIE v CLEIN

Case No. 86-7793 SP 25-A

County Court, Dade County

November 19, 1987

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Sanford Freed for defendant.

David E. Newman for plaintiff.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MARVIN H. GILLMAN, County Judge.

THE ABOVE-STYLED CAUSE came before the Court for trial and the Court after hearing testimony of the Parties, reserved ruling pending presentation of memorandums of law regarding the responsibility of a biological father (Putative Father) for a minor child’s psychological evaluation without prior consent or authorization for same by the father and without a written agreement or Court Order declaring the father’s support obligations. The Court having reviewed the Memorandums submitted, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant herein, Joseph *96Clein being the putative father of a minor child owes the same support rights to said minor child that he would have to a child bom in wedlock. *Rogers v. Runnels,*448 So.2d 530 (5 DCA 1984) review denied 461 So.2d 115 (Fla. Sup. Ct. 1984). The service rendered by Plaintiff Christopher C. Corrie, Ph. D. was as a result of a medical doctor’s referral and comes within the established and accepted obligations of the legal duties of a parent who is able to do so to furnish the necessary medical attention for his minor child. 25 Fla. Jur. 2d Family Law § 102. Plaintiff Christopher C. Corrie, Ph. D. shall have and recover from Defendant Joseph Clein the sum of $600.00 and court cost of $36.00, plus interest of $120.00 for all of which execution shall issue in accordance with the law.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Coral Gables, Dade County, Florida on the 19th day of November, 1987.
firstallongechrismarquez.htm


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    ALLONGE
TO CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE

    DATED
FEBRUARY 28, 2006

    


    This Allonge (the “Allonge”), dated as
of December 1, 2006, attached to and forming a part of a Convertible Promissory
Note,, dated February 28, 2006 (collectively, the “Note”), made by ECOLOGY
COATINGS, INC., a California corporation (the “Company”), payable to the order
of CHRIS L. MARQUEZ (the “Holder”), in the original principal amount of
$300,000.

    


    
      	
              1.  

            	
              The
      first paragraph of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety
      as follows:

            


    

    


    FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, ECOLOGY COATINGS, INC., a California corporation
(“Company”),

    Promises
to pay Chris L. Marquez (“Holder”) or his registered assigns,, in lawful
money

    of
the United States of American the principal sum of THREE HUNDRED
THOUSAND

    Dollars
($300,000), or such lesser amount as shall equal the outstanding principal
amount

    Hereof,
together with interest from the date of this Convertible Promissory Note (the
“Note”)

    on
the unpaid principal balance at a rate equal to fifteen percent (15%) per annum,
computed on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed and a year of 365
days.  All unpaid principal,

    together
with any then unpaid and accrued interest and other amounts payable hereunder,
shall be due and payable on the earlier of (i) December 31, 2007 (the “Maturity
Date”), or (ii) when, upon or after the occurrence of an Event of Default (as
defined below), such amounts are declared due and payable by Holder or made
automatically due and payable in accordance

    with
the terms hereof.  This Note is one of a duly authorized series of
Convertible Promissory

    Notes
of the Company that may be issued by the Company from time to time of like
tenor

    And
effect (except for such variations as may be necessary to express the name of
the payee, the number, the date, and the principal amount of each note) each
dated on or after February 28, 2006 (the “Bridge Notes”).

    


    In all
other respects, the Note is confirmed, ratified and approved and, as amended by
this

    Allonge,
shall continue in full force and effect.

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Holder have caused this Second Allonge to be
executed and delivered as of the date and year first above written.

     

    


     

    ECOLOGY COATINGS, INC.

     

    


     

    


     

    By:  /s/ Adam S.
Tracy

     

    Adam S. Tracy, Esq.

     

    Its:           Vice
President

     

    


     

    


     

    Accepted and agreed to:

     

    


     

    


     

    /s/ Chris L
Marquez

     

    CHRIS L. MARQUEZ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Anthony Parascand, Appellant.

Argued April 28, 1937;

decided May 25, 1937.

*Samuel Rosenzweig*for appellant.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Sol I. Smithline, Joseph A. McLaughlin*and *Patrick J. Hughes*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
#### Billy REEDER *v.*STATE of Arkansas

5636

472 S.W. 2d 721

Opinion delivered November 8, 1971

*Garner, Parker ir Garner,*for appellant.

*Ray Thornton,*Attorney General; for appellee.

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Billy Reeder appeals from the trial court’s action in revoking a suspended sentence. His sole contention is that the trial court had lost jurisdiction at the time it revoked the suspension.

Reeder was found guilty of operating a gambling house. The jury assessed a one year sentence with recommendation that the sentence be suspended. The trial court imposed the one year sentence with the provision that execution thereof be postponed for a period of three years conditioned on good behaviour. Some eighteen months after the imposition of the sentence, the trial court revoked the suspended sentence and ordered that appellant serve one year. It is the contention of appellant that the trial court cannot legally suspend for three years a one year sentence assessed by the jury. Since the revocation occurred more than one year after the fixing of the sentence by the jury, appellant argues that the trial court lost jurisdiction.

The very same contention was the sole issue on appeal from the original conviction. *Reeder*v. *State,*248 Ark. 902, 455 S. W. 2d 92 (1970). We there held that the court could suspend a one year sentence for a period of three years. Appellant asks that we reconsider our deci*361sion in the first appeal and cites some federal decisions, all of which preceded our first opinion. Those decisions are not persuasive because they pertain to interpretations of federal probationary statutes, nothing more.

Affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

May 12, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00181

- CV

Robert CORLEY

, Appellant

v.

Timothy CORLEY

, Jason Corley and Century Oaks Land LLC, Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI02547

Honorable Norma Gonzales , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Petitioner’s unopposed first motion for an extension of time to file a petition for permissive appeal is GRANTED. Petitioner’s petition for permissive appeal filed on May 10, 2021 is deemed timely filed.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of May, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
§ 1604.4 Discrimination against married women. ( a ) The Commission has determined that an employer's rule which forbids or restricts the employment of married women and which is not applicable to married men is a discrimination based on sex prohibited by title VII of the Civil Rights Act. It does not seem to us relevant that the rule is not directed against all females, but only against married females, for so long as sex is a factor in the application of the rule, such application involves a discrimination based on sex.
( b ) It may be that under certain circumstances, such a rule could be justified within the meaning of section 703(e)(1) of title VII. We express no opinion on this question at this time except to point out that sex as a bona fide occupational qualification must be justified in terms of the peculiar requirements of the particular job and not on the basis of a general principle such as the desirability of spreading work.
BioKyowa, Inc. 

P.O. Box 1550 

Cape Girardeau 

MO 63702-1550 

Ph: (573) 335-4849 

Fax: (573) 335-1466 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

United States Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

en 

en 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

On behalf ofBioKyowa Inc., I am writing to express our strong support for the 

applicationof DeltaAicLines for ~newnonstop-service between Detroit and Haneda. 

Approval of Delta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, where· 

many corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. There are over 500 

Japanese companies located in Michigan and hundreds more whose business models rely 

on access to Japan and it's market. The growth of our business ties with Japan has created 

demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Our business travelers look to the convenience 

offlying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. 

Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia, and as an airport that can 

support trans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong 

Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to make it the airlines gateway to 

Asia. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit 

our business travelers. 

Thank you for consideration ofthis request. 

"'ii-," , ' 

(, t 

, , ' I I>
§ 67.113 General medical condition. The general medical standards for a first-class airman medical certificate are: ( a ) No established medical history or clinical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus that requires insulin or any other hypoglycemic drug for control.
( b ) No other organic, functional, or structural disease, defect, or limitation that the Federal Air Surgeon, based on the case history and appropriate, qualified medical judgment relating to the condition involved, finds— ( 1 ) Makes the person unable to safely perform the duties or exercise the privileges of the airman certificate applied for or held; or
( 2 ) May reasonably be expected, for the maximum duration of the airman medical certificate applied for or held, to make the person unable to perform those duties or exercise those privileges.
( c ) No medication or other treatment that the Federal Air Surgeon, based on the case history and appropriate, qualified medical judgment relating to the medication or other treatment involved, finds— ( 1 ) Makes the person unable to safely perform the duties or exercise the privileges of the airman certificate applied for or held; or
( 2 ) May reasonably be expected, for the maximum duration of the airman medical certificate applied for or held, to make the person unable to perform those duties or exercise those privileges.
#### § 1471.910 Agency.

*Agency* means any United States executive department, military department, defense agency, or any other agency of the executive branch. Other agencies of the Federal government are not considered “agencies” for the purposes of this part unless they issue regulations adopting the governmentwide Debarment and Suspension system under Executive orders 12549 and 12689.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 97 (Thursday, May 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12456]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical Systems; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical Systems 
(1205).
    Date and Time: June 14, 2000 and June 15, 2000, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 580, Arlington, Virginia 
22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Joy Paushcke, Program Director, National 
Earthquake Engineering Simulation Program, Room 545, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA (703) 306-1361.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate nominations for the FY'00 
National Earthquake Engineering Simulation Review Panel proposals as 
part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 12, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-12456 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LUCIUS U. AKUCHIE,

Appellant,

v.

HUNTERS GREEN HOMEOWNERS

ASSOCIATION,

Appellee. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 21

- 00073

- CV

Appeal from the

240th Judicial District Court

of Fort Bend County, Texas

(TC#17

- DCV

- 241422)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for want of prosecution. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We

further order Appellant to pay all costs of this appeal and that this decision be certified below for

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 25TH DAY OF JULY, 2023.

L ISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-1171

LT Case No. 2022-CA-000693

_____________________________

DUANE MICHAEL COTTIER,

Appellant,

v.

SUNTAAC AND COMPANY, INC.,

INTERFIVE, INC., DIAMOND 

CONSTRUCTION, SCOTT 

WYCKOFF, AND RONALD 

CHAPMAN,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County. 

Caroline Falvey, Judge. 

Duane Michael Cottier, South Bay, pro se. 

No Appearance for Appellees. 

October 3, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, JAY, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
# EUR-Lex - 32000D0344 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000D0344

**2000/344/EC: Commission Decision of 2 May 2000 amending Decision 92/452/EEC establishing lists of embryo collection teams and embryo production teams approved in third countries for export of bovine embryos to the Community (notified under document number C(2000) 1145) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 119 , 20/05/2000 P. 0038 - 0038 *

Commission Decision

of 2 May 2000

amending Decision 92/452/EEC establishing lists of embryo collection teams and embryo production teams approved in third countries for export of bovine embryos to the Community

(notified under document number C(2000) 1145)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2000/344/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 89/556/EEC of 25 September 1989 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in and imports from third countries of embryos of domestic animals of the bovine species(1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 8 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Decision 92/452/EEC(2), as last amended by Decision 2000/51/EC(3), establishes a list of embryo collection teams and embryo production teams approved in third countries for the export of embryos of domestic animals of the bovine species to the Community.

(2) The competent veterinary services of Canada have forwarded requests for amendments to the lists of teams officially approved in their territories for the export of embryos of domestic animals of the bovine species to the Community; it is therefore necessary to amend the list of approved teams; guarantees regarding compliance with the requirements specified in Article 8 of Directive 89/556/EEC have been received by the Commission.

(3) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In the Annex of Decision 92/452/EEC, in the list concerning Canada:

- the following teams are added:

- Team approval number: E 945

>TABLE>

Team veterinarian: Dr Daniel Gervais

- Team approval number: E 646

>TABLE>

Team veterinarian: Dr Milford Wain

- the two lines concerning team No 933 are replaced by the following:

- Team approval number: E 933

>TABLE>

Team veterinarians: Dr Louis Picard, Dr Marc Dery.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 May 2000.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 302, 19.10.1989, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 250, 29.8.1992, p. 40.

(3) OJ L 19, 25.1.2000, p. 54.
#### In the Matter of Max Kaplan, Doing Business under the Name of Kaplan’s Valet Service, Respondent, against Hermine C. Peyser, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

Submitted May 17, 1937;

decided May 25, 1937.

Motion to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 273 N. Y. 147.)