### Name:

Title: Company: Sign Date: Name: Thomas F. Mattei Title: Quality Assurance Manager / Techni Company: Avogadro Environmental Corporatio Sign Date: 6/29/2010 Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date



## PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2 Final Test Report for

/ / Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in this test report are true, accurate, and complete. I have reviewed all testing details and results in this test report and hereby certify that the test report is authentic and accurate.

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 1 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Facility Information: PPL Brunner Island, LLC Wago Road

York Haven PA 17370 Contact: Deborah Runkle Phone: 717-266-7550 Fax: Email: Testing Company: Avogadro Environmental Corporation 1350 Sullivan Trail, Suite A

Easton PA 18040 Contact: Thomas Mattei Phone: 610-559-8776 x 103 Fax: 610-559-8913 Email: tmattei@avogadro.net

Air Permit Number: 67-05005 Permitted Source ID/Name: Unit 1 / 2 031A/032 Permitted Maximum Process Rate: N/A Max. Normal Operation Process Rate: N/A Target Process Test Rate N/A

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or process flow diagram: The PPL Brunner Island, LLC facility is located in York Haven, York County, Pennsylvania. Units 1 and 2 are Combustion Engineering pulverized coal-fired boilers used to supply steam to a General Electric 350 megawatt (MW) and 400 MW turbine. Exhaust gases from Unit 1 pass through a baghouse and Unit 2 exhaust gases pass through an Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP). Exhaust from the Unit 1 baghouse and Unit 2 ESP flow into the Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) system where they combine and are then discharged through a common fiberglass flue inside a single concrete shell. Industry/SCC/NAIS 221112

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information: AFS #: 4213300024 FRS #: 110000601778

SCC / Description 10100202 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal - Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom (Bituminous Coal)

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location Round

Duct Diam. Distance from upstream dist. Distance from

downstream dist. Number of

Traverse Ports Equiv. Diam Min.Travers Points Rect. Duct Length /Width Stack Exit 368 816 4176 4 0 12 0 0

Target Parameter Test Method Number of

Test Runs Test Run

Duration Sample

Points Comments Location % H2O Method 1 - 4 3 60 0 Runs range from 60 to 240 minutes Stack Exit



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 2 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26A 3 60 0 The samples were collected in a combined train with HCN using NaOH impingers only.

Method 26A & CTM033 The MDLs are determined by the analysis of at least seven replicate standards at a concentration near the expected MDL. To determine the MDL value, the standard deviation of the replicate analyses is calculated and that number is multiplied by the Student t factor that corresponds to the number of replicates analyzed. The MDL value should meet the criteria stated in the CFR Title 40, Part 136 B.

If the MDL determined does not meet these criteria, a default MDL value will be used which is 1/10 of the concentration of the standard used to produce the MDL value. Stack Exit



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 3 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 60 0 The samples were collected in a combined train with HCN using NaOH impingers only. Chlorine data for Method 26A analysis is not available from the laboratory.

Method 26A & CTM033 The MDLs are determined by the analysis of at least seven replicate standards at a concentration near the expected MDL. To determine the MDL value, the standard deviation of the replicate analyses is calculated and that number is multiplied by the Student t factor that corresponds to the number of replicates analyzed. The MDL value should meet the criteria stated in the CFR Title 40, Part 136 B.

If the MDL determined does not meet these criteria, a default MDL value will be used which is 1/10 of the concentration of the standard used to produce the MDL value. Stack Exit



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 4 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Cadmium Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 For Method 29 the analyst takes the statistically determined MDL (Method Detection Limit) value and multiplies it by a “factor” in order to determine the RDL (Reporting Detection Limit). This process is similar to the one employed in Method 23 where the EDL is determined based on a constant factor of 2.5 times the signal to noise ratio.

For the ICP/MS this “factor” can vary. The factor is determined by the analyst at the bench and takes into account all relevant factors such as, final volumes, interferences, matrix issues, etc. The RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) reported is the lowest concentration that the lab feels can be reported within the 99% confidence interval. For values below this RDL the uncertainty increases. Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 bullet H refers to the ICP/MS procedure. Stack Exit



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 5 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Mercury Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 For Method 29 the analyst takes the statistically determined MDL (Method Detection Limit) value and multiplies it by a “factor” in order to determine the RDL (Reporting Detection Limit). This process is similar to the one employed in Method 23 where the EDL is determined based on a constant factor of 2.5 times the signal to noise ratio.

For the ICP/MS this “factor” can vary. The factor is determined by the analyst at the bench and takes into account all relevant factors such as, final volumes, interferences, matrix issues, etc. The RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) reported is the lowest concentration that the lab feels can be reported within the 99% confidence interval. For values below this RDL the uncertainty increases. Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 bullet H refers to the ICP/MS procedure. Stack Exit



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 6 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Nickel Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 For Method 29 the analyst takes the statistically determined MDL (Method Detection Limit) value and multiplies it by a “factor” in order to determine the RDL (Reporting Detection Limit). This process is similar to the one employed in Method 23 where the EDL is determined based on a constant factor of 2.5 times the signal to noise ratio.

For the ICP/MS this “factor” can vary. The factor is determined by the analyst at the bench and takes into account all relevant factors such as, final volumes, interferences, matrix issues, etc. The RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) reported is the lowest concentration that the lab feels can be reported within the 99% confidence interval. For values below this RDL the uncertainty increases. Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 bullet H refers to the ICP/MS procedure. Stack Exit



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 7 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Selenium Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 For Method 29 the analyst takes the statistically determined MDL (Method Detection Limit) value and multiplies it by a “factor” in order to determine the RDL (Reporting Detection Limit). This process is similar to the one employed in Method 23 where the EDL is determined based on a constant factor of 2.5 times the signal to noise ratio.

For the ICP/MS this “factor” can vary. The factor is determined by the analyst at the bench and takes into account all relevant factors such as, final volumes, interferences, matrix issues, etc. The RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) reported is the lowest concentration that the lab feels can be reported within the 99% confidence interval. For values below this RDL the uncertainty increases. Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 bullet H refers to the ICP/MS procedure. Stack Exit



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 8 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Antimony Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 For Method 29 the analyst takes the statistically determined MDL (Method Detection Limit) value and multiplies it by a “factor” in order to determine the RDL (Reporting Detection Limit). This process is similar to the one employed in Method 23 where the EDL is determined based on a constant factor of 2.5 times the signal to noise ratio.

For the ICP/MS this “factor” can vary. The factor is determined by the analyst at the bench and takes into account all relevant factors such as, final volumes, interferences, matrix issues, etc. The RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) reported is the lowest concentration that the lab feels can be reported within the 99% confidence interval. For values below this RDL the uncertainty increases. Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 bullet H refers to the ICP/MS procedure. Stack Exit



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 9 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Lead Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 For Method 29 the analyst takes the statistically determined MDL (Method Detection Limit) value and multiplies it by a “factor” in order to determine the RDL (Reporting Detection Limit). This process is similar to the one employed in Method 23 where the EDL is determined based on a constant factor of 2.5 times the signal to noise ratio.

For the ICP/MS this “factor” can vary. The factor is determined by the analyst at the bench and takes into account all relevant factors such as, final volumes, interferences, matrix issues, etc. The RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) reported is the lowest concentration that the lab feels can be reported within the 99% confidence interval. For values below this RDL the uncertainty increases. Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 bullet H refers to the ICP/MS procedure. Stack Exit



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 10 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Cobalt Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 For Method 29 the analyst takes the statistically determined MDL (Method Detection Limit) value and multiplies it by a “factor” in order to determine the RDL (Reporting Detection Limit). This process is similar to the one employed in Method 23 where the EDL is determined based on a constant factor of 2.5 times the signal to noise ratio.

For the ICP/MS this “factor” can vary. The factor is determined by the analyst at the bench and takes into account all relevant factors such as, final volumes, interferences, matrix issues, etc. The RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) reported is the lowest concentration that the lab feels can be reported within the 99% confidence interval. For values below this RDL the uncertainty increases. Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 bullet H refers to the ICP/MS procedure. Stack Exit



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 11 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Manganese Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 For Method 29 the analyst takes the statistically determined MDL (Method Detection Limit) value and multiplies it by a “factor” in order to determine the RDL (Reporting Detection Limit). This process is similar to the one employed in Method 23 where the EDL is determined based on a constant factor of 2.5 times the signal to noise ratio.

For the ICP/MS this “factor” can vary. The factor is determined by the analyst at the bench and takes into account all relevant factors such as, final volumes, interferences, matrix issues, etc. The RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) reported is the lowest concentration that the lab feels can be reported within the 99% confidence interval. For values below this RDL the uncertainty increases. Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 bullet H refers to the ICP/MS procedure. Stack Exit



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 12 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Chromium Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 For Method 29 the analyst takes the statistically determined MDL (Method Detection Limit) value and multiplies it by a “factor” in order to determine the RDL (Reporting Detection Limit). This process is similar to the one employed in Method 23 where the EDL is determined based on a constant factor of 2.5 times the signal to noise ratio.

For the ICP/MS this “factor” can vary. The factor is determined by the analyst at the bench and takes into account all relevant factors such as, final volumes, interferences, matrix issues, etc. The RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) reported is the lowest concentration that the lab feels can be reported within the 99% confidence interval. For values below this RDL the uncertainty increases. Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 bullet H refers to the ICP/MS procedure. Stack Exit



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 13 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Filterable Particulate Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 For Method 29 the analyst takes the statistically determined MDL (Method Detection Limit) value and multiplies it by a “factor” in order to determine the RDL (Reporting Detection Limit). This process is similar to the one employed in Method 23 where the EDL is determined based on a constant factor of 2.5 times the signal to noise ratio.

For the ICP/MS this “factor” can vary. The factor is determined by the analyst at the bench and takes into account all relevant factors such as, final volumes, interferences, matrix issues, etc. The RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) reported is the lowest concentration that the lab feels can be reported within the 99% confidence interval. For values below this RDL the uncertainty increases. Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 bullet H refers to the ICP/MS procedure. Stack Exit



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 14 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Beryllium Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 For Method 29 the analyst takes the statistically determined MDL (Method Detection Limit) value and multiplies it by a “factor” in order to determine the RDL (Reporting Detection Limit). This process is similar to the one employed in Method 23 where the EDL is determined based on a constant factor of 2.5 times the signal to noise ratio.

For the ICP/MS this “factor” can vary. The factor is determined by the analyst at the bench and takes into account all relevant factors such as, final volumes, interferences, matrix issues, etc. The RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) reported is the lowest concentration that the lab feels can be reported within the 99% confidence interval. For values below this RDL the uncertainty increases. Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 bullet H refers to the ICP/MS procedure. Stack Exit



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 15 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Arsenic Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 For Method 29 the analyst takes the statistically determined MDL (Method Detection Limit) value and multiplies it by a “factor” in order to determine the RDL (Reporting Detection Limit). This process is similar to the one employed in Method 23 where the EDL is determined based on a constant factor of 2.5 times the signal to noise ratio.

For the ICP/MS this “factor” can vary. The factor is determined by the analyst at the bench and takes into account all relevant factors such as, final volumes, interferences, matrix issues, etc. The RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) reported is the lowest concentration that the lab feels can be reported within the 99% confidence interval. For values below this RDL the uncertainty increases. Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 bullet H refers to the ICP/MS procedure. Stack Exit

Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 240 0 Runs range from 62 to 278 minutes Stack Exit

O2 Method 3A O2 3 62 0 Runs range from 62 to 278 minutes Stack Exit



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 16 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Inorganic (Aqueous) Condensible Part. Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Back half particulate matter (OTM-028) mass was calculated using the maximum allowable blank correction value of 0.002 g. A correction value for each fraction was calculated by dividing the fraction blank amount by the total back half blank amount and multiplying that by the allowable blank correction value of 0.002 g.

Method OTM-028 A portion of reagent water that has been spiked with a known amount of material is extracted 3 times with Methylene Chloride. The solvent is evaporated to dryness. Detection Limits are calculated by using the standard deviation from these 10 replicate low level spikes. The standard deviation is multiplied by the appropriate Student T value to determine the statistically derived reporting limit. The non-extractable portion is determined by the weight difference on a series of 10 vials. Detection Limits are calculated by using the standard deviation from these 10 replicates. The standard deviation is multiplied by the appropriate Student T value to determine the statistically derived reporting limit. Stack Exit



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 17 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Organic Condensible Particulate Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Back half particulate matter (OTM-028) mass was calculated using the maximum allowable blank correction value of 0.002 g. A correction value for each fraction was calculated by dividing the fraction blank amount by the total back half blank amount and multiplying that by the allowable blank correction value of 0.002 g.

Method OTM-028 A portion of reagent water that has been spiked with a known amount of material is extracted 3 times with Methylene Chloride. The solvent is evaporated to dryness. Detection Limits are calculated by using the standard deviation from these 10 replicate low level spikes. The standard deviation is multiplied by the appropriate Student T value to determine the statistically derived reporting limit. The non-extractable portion is determined by the weight difference on a series of 10 vials. Detection Limits are calculated by using the standard deviation from these 10 replicates. The standard deviation is multiplied by the appropriate Student T value to determine the statistically derived reporting limit. Stack Exit



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 18 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Total Particulate Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Method OTM-028 A portion of reagent water that has been spiked with a known amount of material is extracted 3 times with Methylene Chloride. The solvent is evaporated to dryness. Detection Limits are calculated by using the standard deviation from these 10 replicate low level spikes. The standard deviation is multiplied by the appropriate Student T value to determine the statistically derived reporting limit. The non-extractable portion is determined by the weight difference on a series of 10 vials. Detection Limits are calculated by using the standard deviation from these 10 replicates. The standard deviation is multiplied by the appropriate Student T value to determine the statistically derived reporting limit. Stack Exit



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 19 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation of request AND approval, including dates.

Filterable Particulate Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Pursuant to Method 5, no blank filter was analyzed or blank filter correction performed.

Method OTM-028 A portion of reagent water that has been spiked with a known amount of material is extracted 3 times with Methylene Chloride. The solvent is evaporated to dryness. Detection Limits are calculated by using the standard deviation from these 10 replicate low level spikes. The standard deviation is multiplied by the appropriate Student T value to determine the statistically derived reporting limit. The non-extractable portion is determined by the weight difference on a series of 10 vials. Detection Limits are calculated by using the standard deviation from these 10 replicates. The standard deviation is multiplied by the appropriate Student T value to determine the statistically derived reporting limit. Stack Exit

Sulfur Dioxide Method 6C 3 62 0 Runs range from 62 to 78 minutes Stack Exit
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) Method 7E 3 62 0 Runs range from 62 to 78 minutes Stack Exit



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 20 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary



### Location Stack Exit - Method 26A Average Run Number M26A-2 M26A-3 M26A-4
Test Date 4/21/2010 4/21/2010 4/21/2010 Run Start Time 3:10:00 PM 5:00:00 PM 6:40:00 PM Run Finish Time 4:32:00 PM 6:20:00 PM 7:58:00 PM Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 33.249 33.485 33.789 33.508 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 21.15 19.32 20.19 20.220 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 14.07 14.13 14.28 14.160 Carbon Dioxide, % 13.34 13.43 12.99 13.253 Oxygen, % 5.73 5.69 5.45 5.623 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 127.15 127.31 127.69 127.383 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,476,789.3 1,505,126.0 1,520,862.6 1,500,925.96 7 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 1,922,044.8 1,961,487.2 1,986,748.1 1,956,760.03 3 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 106.0 104.7 104.6 105.100 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000
Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000
Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 21 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Location Stack Exit - Method 29 Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time
Run Finish Time Net Run Time, minutes Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2
Fw
Fc



### Location Stack Exit - Method 5/OTM-28 Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Net Run Time, minutes Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2
Fw
Fc



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 22 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Location Stack Exit - Method 6C Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time
Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Fuel Type
Fw
Fc



### Location Stack Exit - Method 7E Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time
Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Fuel Type
Fw
Fc



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 23 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Emissions Summary



### Location: Stack Exit - Method 26A Compound: Hydrogen Chloride Average RunNumber M26A-2 M26A-3 M26A-4 Mass_mg 0.459 0.465 0.432 0.452 lb/mmBtuO2 4.10E-04 4.11E-04 3.73E-04 0.000 

### Compound: Hydrogen Fluoride Average RunNumber M26A-2 M26A-3 M26A-4 Mass_mg 0.47 0.476 0.442 0.463 lb/mmBtuO2 4.20E-04 4.21E-04 3.82E-04 0.000



### Location: Stack Exit - Method 29 Compound: Antimony Average RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3 Mass_mg 0.0028 0.0028 0.0028 0.003 lb/mmBtuO2 6.12E-07 6.07E-07 5.92E-07 0.000 

### Compound: Arsenic Average RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3 Mass_mg 0.004 0.00377 0.00381 0.004 lb/mmBtuO2 8.74E-07 8.17E-07 8.06E-07 0.000 

### Compound: Beryllium Average RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3 Mass_mg 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.001 lb/mmBtuO2 1.53E-07 1.52E-07 1.48E-07 0.000 

### Compound: Cadmium Average RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3 Mass_mg 0.00072 0.0007 0.0007 0.001 lb/mmBtuO2 1.57E-07 1.52E-07 1.48E-07 0.000 

### Compound: Chromium Average RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3 Mass_mg 0.00905 0.02234 0.03344 0.022 lb/mmBtuO2 1.98E-06 4.84E-06 7.07E-06 0.000 

### Compound: Cobalt Average RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3 Mass_mg 0.00198 0.00217 0.00154 0.002 lb/mmBtuO2 4.33E-07 4.70E-07 3.26E-07 0.000



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 24 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Compound: Filterable Particulate Average RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3 Mass_mg 122.8 108.6 115.5 115.633 lb/mmBtuO2 2.68E-02 2.35E-02 2.44E-02 0.025 

### Compound: Lead Average RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3 Mass_mg 0.00291 0.00166 0.00319 0.003 lb/mmBtuO2 6.36E-07 3.60E-07 6.75E-07 0.000 

### Compound: Manganese Average RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3 Mass_mg 0.02133 0.01113 0.01443 0.016 lb/mmBtuO2 4.66E-06 2.41E-06 3.05E-06 0.000 

### Compound: Mercury Average RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3 Mass_mg 0.00556 0.00515 0.00567 0.005 lb/mmBtuO2 1.21E-06 1.12E-06 1.20E-06 0.000 

### Compound: Nickel Average RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3 Mass_mg 0.01796 0.07656 0.11136 0.069 lb/mmBtuO2 3.92E-06 1.66E-05 2.36E-05 0.000 

### Compound: Selenium Average RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3 Mass_mg 0.1084 0.1174 0.0977 0.108 lb/mmBtuO2 2.37E-05 2.55E-05 2.07E-05 0.000



### Location: Stack Exit - Method 5/OTM-28 Compound: Filterable Particulate Average RunNumber OTM28-1 OTM28-2 OTM28-3 Mass_mg 107 144.9 111.3 121.067 lb/mmBtuO2 2.33E-02 3.12E-02 2.37E-02 0.026 

### Compound: Inorganic (Aqueous) Condensible Pa Average RunNumber OTM28-1 OTM28-2 OTM28-3 Mass_mg 15.5 19.5 29.5 21.500 lb/mmBtuO2 3.38E-03 4.20E-03 6.29E-03 0.005 

### Compound: Organic Condensible Particulate Average RunNumber OTM28-1 OTM28-2 OTM28-3 Mass_mg 3.4 4.2 5.4 4.333


### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 25 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Process Run Data lb/mmBtuO2 7.42E-04 9.06E-04 1.15E-03 0.001 

### Compound: Total Particulate Average RunNumber OTM28-1 OTM28-2 OTM28-3 Mass_mg 125.9 168.6 146.2 146.900 lb/mmBtuO2 2.75E-02 3.64E-02 3.12E-02 0.032



### Location: Stack Exit - Method 6C Compound: Sulfur Dioxide Average Run 2 3 4 lb/mmBtuO2 4.24E-01 4.14E-01 3.70E-01 0.403 ppm 1.89E+02 1.85E+02 1.68E+02 180.667 ppm@7%O2 1.73E+02 1.69E+02 1.51E+02 164.333



### Location: Stack Exit - Method 7E Compound: Nitrogen oxides (NOx) Average Run 2 3 4 lb/mmBtuO2 3.20E-01 3.22E-01 3.09E-01 0.317 ppm 1.99E+02 2.00E+02 1.96E+02 198.333 ppm@7%O2 1.82E+02 1.83E+02 1.76E+02 180.333



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 26 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Process Run Data



### Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value 1 Coal Burned 0 1000 Tons/hr


### 10 Coal Burned 0 1000 Tons/hr
11 Coal Burned 0 1000 Tons/hr
12 Coal Burned 0 1000 Tons/hr


### 2 Coal Burned 0 1000 Tons/hr
3 Coal Burned 0 1000 Tons/hr
4 Coal Burned 0 1000 Tons/hr


### 5 Coal Burned 0 1000 Tons/hr
6 Coal Burned 0 1000 Tons/hr
7 Coal Burned 0 1000 Tons/hr


### 8 Coal Burned 0 1000 Tons/hr
9 Coal Burned 0 1000 Tons/hr
1 Average Heat Input 6240 MMBtu/hr


### 10 Average Heat Input 6198 MMBtu/hr
11 Average Heat Input 6206 MMBtu/hr
12 Average Heat Input 6191 MMBtu/hr


### 2 Average Heat Input 6251 MMBtu/hr
3 Average Heat Input 6209 MMBtu/hr
4 Average Heat Input 6198 MMBtu/hr


### 5 Average Heat Input 6206 MMBtu/hr
6 Average Heat Input 6191 MMBtu/hr
7 Average Heat Input 6240 MMBtu/hr


### 8 Average Heat Input 6251 MMBtu/hr
9 Average Heat Input 6209 MMBtu/hr


### 1 Steam Output 2166 1000 lb steam/hr
10 Steam Output 2539 1000 lb steam/hr
11 Steam Output 2546 1000 lb steam/hr


### 12 Steam Output 2551 1000 lb steam/hr
2 Steam Output 2162 1000 lb steam/hr
3 Steam Output 2132 1000 lb steam/hr


### 4 Steam Output 2108 1000 lb steam/hr
5 Steam Output 2100 1000 lb steam/hr
6 Steam Output 2094 1000 lb steam/hr



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 27 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

7 Steam Output 2469 1000 lb steam/hr


### 8 Steam Output 2491 1000 lb steam/hr
9 Steam Output 2565 1000 lb steam/hr
1 Fuel Oil Firing Rate 20 gal/hr


### 10 Fuel Oil Firing Rate 10 gal/hr
11 Fuel Oil Firing Rate 31 gal/hr
12 Fuel Oil Firing Rate 46 gal/hr


### 2 Fuel Oil Firing Rate 0 gal/hr
3 Fuel Oil Firing Rate 8 gal/hr
4 Fuel Oil Firing Rate 23 gal/hr


### 5 Fuel Oil Firing Rate 18 gal/hr
6 Fuel Oil Firing Rate 22 gal/hr
7 Fuel Oil Firing Rate 0 gal/hr


### 8 Fuel Oil Firing Rate 0 gal/hr
9 Fuel Oil Firing Rate 0 gal/hr
1 Flue Gas Flow Rate 97407 wKscfh


### 10 Flue Gas Flow Rate 97227 wKscfh
11 Flue Gas Flow Rate 97037 wKscfh
12 Flue Gas Flow Rate 96670 wKscfh


### 4 Flue Gas Flow Rate 97227 wKscfh
5 Flue Gas Flow Rate 97037 wKscfh


### 6 Flue Gas Flow Rate 96670 wKscfh
7 Flue Gas Flow Rate 97407 wKscfh
8 Flue Gas Flow Rate 97245 wKscfh


### 9 Flue Gas Flow Rate 96732 wKscfh
1 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 4.2 in H20
10 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 4.3 in H20


### 11 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 4.3 in H20
12 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 4.2 in H20
4 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 4.3 in H20


### 5 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 4.3 in H20
6 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 4.2 in H20
7 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 4.2 in H20


### 8 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 4.2 in H20
9 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 4.3 in H20
1 FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 5.6 pH



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 28 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

10 FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 5.4 pH


### 11 FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 5.4 pH
12 FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 5.5 pH
4 FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 5.4 pH


### 5 FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 5.4 pH
6 FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 5.5 pH
7 FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 5.6 pH


### 8 FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 5.5 pH
9 FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 5.6 pH
1 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 198 gal/min


### 10 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 217 gal/min
11 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 191 gal/min
12 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 205 gal/min


### 4 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 217 gal/min
5 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 191 gal/min
6 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 205 gal/min


### 7 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 198 gal/min
8 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 197 gal/min
9 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 201 gal/min


### 1 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 3.5 %
10 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 3.7 %


### 11 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 3.7 %
12 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 3.7 %
4 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 3.5 %


### 5 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 3.5 %
6 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 3.5 %
7 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 3.7 %


### 8 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 3.7 %
9 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 3.7 %
1 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 11.5 %


### 10 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 11.5 %
11 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 11.5 %
12 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 11.5 %


### 4 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 11.5 %
5 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 11.5 %
6 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 11.5 %



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 29 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

7 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 11.5 %


### 8 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 11.6 %
9 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 11.5 %
1 Flue Gas Moisture Content 0 %


### 10 Flue Gas Moisture Content 0 %
11 Flue Gas Moisture Content 0 %
12 Flue Gas Moisture Content 0 %


### 4 Flue Gas Moisture Content 0 %
5 Flue Gas Moisture Content 0 %
6 Flue Gas Moisture Content 0 %


### 7 Flue Gas Moisture Content 0 %
8 Flue Gas Moisture Content 0 %
9 Flue Gas Moisture Content 0 %


### 1 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 125 Deg F
10 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 126 Deg F
11 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 126 Deg F


### 12 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 126 Deg F
4 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 126 Deg F
5 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 126 Deg F


### 6 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 126 Deg F
7 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 125 Deg F


### 8 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 125 Deg F
9 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 125 Deg F
1 Flue Gas Pressure 0.97 atm 

### 10 Flue Gas Pressure 0.96 atm
11 Flue Gas Pressure 0.96 atm
12 Flue Gas Pressure 0.96 atm


### 4 Flue Gas Pressure 0.96 atm 5 Flue Gas Pressure 0.96 atm
6 Flue Gas Pressure 0.96 atm


### 7 Flue Gas Pressure 0.97 atm 8 Flue Gas Pressure 0.97 atm
9 Flue Gas Pressure 0.96 atm


### 1 Standard Pressure 1 atm 10 Standard Pressure 1 atm
11 Standard Pressure 1 atm



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 30 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

12 Standard Pressure 1 atm


### 4 Standard Pressure 1 atm 5 Standard Pressure 1 atm
6 Standard Pressure 1 atm


### 7 Standard Pressure 1 atm 8 Standard Pressure 1 atm 9 Standard Pressure 1 atm


### 1 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F
10 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F
11 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F


### 12 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F
4 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F
5 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F


### 6 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F
7 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F
8 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F


### 9 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F
1 Unit Gross Electrical Output 335 Mwe
10 Unit Gross Electrical Output 393 Mwe


### 11 Unit Gross Electrical Output 393 Mwe
12 Unit Gross Electrical Output 393 Mwe


### 4 Unit Gross Electrical Output 330 Mwe
5 Unit Gross Electrical Output 330 Mwe
6 Unit Gross Electrical Output 330 Mwe


### 7 Unit Gross Electrical Output 395 Mwe
8 Unit Gross Electrical Output 394 Mwe
9 Unit Gross Electrical Output 393 Mwe


### 1 Unit Net Electric Generation 309 MWh
10 Unit Net Electric Generation 374 MWh
11 Unit Net Electric Generation 375 MWh


### 12 Unit Net Electric Generation 375 MWh
4 Unit Net Electric Generation 305 MWh
5 Unit Net Electric Generation 306 MWh


### 6 Unit Net Electric Generation 307 MWh
7 Unit Net Electric Generation 377 MWh
8 Unit Net Electric Generation 376 MWh



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 31 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

9 Unit Net Electric Generation 374 MWh


### 1 0
10 0
11 0


### 12 0
4 0
5 0


### 6 0
7 0
8 0


### 9 0
1 0
10 0


### 11 0
12 0
4 0


### 5 0
6 0
7 0


### 8 0
9 0


### 1 ESP Status 0 i/s or o/s
10 ESP Status 0 i/s or o/s
11 ESP Status 0 i/s or o/s


### 12 ESP Status 0 i/s or o/s
4 ESP Status 0 i/s or o/s
5 ESP Status 0 i/s or o/s


### 6 ESP Status 0 i/s or o/s
7 ESP Status 0 i/s or o/s
8 ESP Status 0 i/s or o/s


### 9 ESP Status 0 i/s or o/s
1 Baghouse Status 0 i/s or o/s
10 Baghouse Status 0 i/s or o/s


### 11 Baghouse Status 0 i/s or o/s
12 Baghouse Status 0 i/s or o/s
4 Baghouse Status 0 i/s or o/s



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 32 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data 5 Baghouse Status 0 i/s or o/s


### 6 Baghouse Status 0 i/s or o/s
7 Baghouse Status 0 i/s or o/s
8 Baghouse Status 0 i/s or o/s


### 9 Baghouse Status 0 i/s or o/s
1 0
1 0

Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value 

### 1 BAGHOUSE 0 0
1 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR 0 0


### 1 FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION 0 0

Run Name Value UOM Comments 1 Fuel Higher Heating Value 0 Btu/lb 1 Fuel Moisture 0 % 

### 1 Fuel Mercury Content 0 ppm 1 Fuel Cadmium Content 0 ppm 1 Ultimate/Proximate Analysis 0 1 Fuel Nickel Content 0 ppm 

### 1 Fuel Arsenic Content 0 ppm 1 Fuel Chromium Content 0 ppm 1 Fuel Beryllium Content 0 ppm 

### 1 Fuel Lead Content 0 ppm 1 Fuel Manganese Content 0 ppm 1 Fuel Chlorine Content 0 ppm 1 Fuel Fluorine Content 0 ppm



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 33 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail



### Location Stack Exit - Method 26A Average Run Number M26A-2 M26A-3 M26A-4 Test Date 4/21/2010 4/21/2010 4/21/2010 Run Start Time 3:10:00 PM 5:00:00 PM 6:40:00 PM Run Finish Time 4:32:00 PM 6:20:00 PM 7:58:00 PM Net Traversing Points 12 12 12 Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.219 0.219 0.219 0.219 Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1 1 1 1.000 Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.78 29.77 29.77 29.773 Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.06 1.08 1.11 1.083 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 34.182 34.381 34.745 34.436 Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 81.69 80.85 81.69 81.410 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 33.249 33.485 33.789 33.508 Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 189.6 170.3 181.7 180.533 Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 8.92 8.02 8.55 8.497 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 21.15 19.32 20.19 20.220 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 14.07 14.13 14.28 14.160 Dry Mole Fraction 0.8593 0.8587 0.8572 0.858 Carbon Dioxide, % 13.34 13.43 12.99 13.253 Oxygen, % 5.73 5.69 5.45 5.623 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.93 80.88 81.56 81.123 Fuel Factor 1.14 1.13 1.19 Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.36 30.38 30.30 30.347 Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.90 29.56 29.61 29.690 Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.45 -0.45 -0.45 -0.450 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.75 29.74 29.74 29.743 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 127.15 127.31 127.69 127.383 Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.5524992177 89829 0.568683778

914407 0.583894436

415868 0.568
Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 43.37 44.26 44.83 44.153 Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 738.623 738.623 738.623 738.623 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,476,789.3 1,505,126.0 1,520,862.6 1,500,925.9 67 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 1,922,044.8 1,961,487.2 1,986,748.1 1,956,760.0 33 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 106.0 104.7 104.6 105.100 Percent Excess Air, % 36.6 36.3 33.9 35.600 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000 Round Duct Diameter, inches 368 368 368 Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0 Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0 Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000 Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 34 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Location Stack Exit - Method 29 Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Net Traversing Points Net Run Time, minutes Nozzle Diameter, inches Pitot Tube Coefficient Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf Total Moisture Liquid collected, g Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % Dry Mole Fraction Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % Fuel Factor Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % Percent Excess Air, % F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Round Duct Diameter, inches Rectangular Duct Width, inches Rectangular Duct Length, inches Fw Fc



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 35 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Location Stack Exit - Method 5/OTM-28 Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Net Traversing Points Net Run Time, minutes Nozzle Diameter, inches Pitot Tube Coefficient Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf Total Moisture Liquid collected, g Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % Dry Mole Fraction Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % Fuel Factor Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % Percent Excess Air, % F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Round Duct Diameter, inches Rectangular Duct Width, inches Rectangular Duct Length, inches Fw Fc



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 36 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Location Stack Exit - Method 6C Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type Fw Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 37 of 38

### PPL Generation, LLC - Brunner Island Station Units 1/2

Location Stack Exit - Method 7E Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type Fw Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units



### Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 38 of 38