alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31999D0643 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999D0643

**99/643/EC: Commission Decision of 15 September 1999 amending Decision 1999/507/EC on certain protection measures with regard to certain fruit bats, dogs and cats coming from Malaysia (Peninsula) and Australia (notified under document number C(1999) 2975) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 255 , 30/09/1999 P. 0038 - 0038 *

COMMISSION DECISION

of 15 September 1999

amending Decision 1999/507/EC on certain protection measures with regard to certain fruit bats, dogs and cats coming from Malaysia (Peninsula) and Australia

(notified under document number C(1999) 2975)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(1999/643/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC(1), as last amended by Directive 96/43/EC(2), and in particular Article 18(7) thereof,

(1) Whereas by Decision 1999/507/EC(3) the Commission has adopted protection measures with regard to certain fruit bats, dogs and cats coming from Malaysia (Peninsula) and Australia with regard to Nipah respective Hendra disease; whereas the test requirements for cats imported from Australia must be modified so as to allow the use of a validated diagnostic test for the detection of antibody against the Hendra disease virus;

(2) Whereas this Decision is in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The second indent of paragraph 2 of Article 3 of Decision 1999/507/EC is amended as follows:

1. The words "IgM and IgG capture ELISA test" are replaced by the words "serum neutralisation test".

2. The words "10 days" are replaced by the words "14 days".

Article 2

Member States shall amend the measures they apply with regard to Australia to bring them into line with this Decision.

They shall inform the Commission thereof.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 September 1999.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 56.

(2) OJ L 162, 1.7.1996, p. 1.

(3) OJ L 194, 27.7.1999, p. 66.
**EXHIBIT 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements onForm S-8 (Nos.333-67085,333-79269,333-36680,333-47026,333-53332,333-69036,333-101759,333-105864 and333-130626), theRegistration Statements onForm S-3 (Nos.333-81626,333-85996,333-118519,333-120602,333-122068 and333-131433) and theRegistration Statement onForm S-4(No. 333-122069 ofDigital River, Inc. and in the related Prospectus’) of ourreports dated March 14, 2006, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of Digital River, Inc.,Digital River, Inc. management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, andthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingof Digital River, Inc. included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) forthe year ended December 31, 2005.     Our audits also included the financial statement schedule ofDigital River, Inc. listed in Item 15 (a)(2). This scheduleis the responsibility of the Company’s management. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. Inour opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,when considered in relation to the basic financial statementstaken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, theinformation set forth therein.    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Minneapolis, MinnesotaMarch 14, 2006
§ 1980.108 Role of Federal agencies. ( a ) ( 1 ) The complainant and the respondent will be parties in every proceeding and must be served with copies of all documents in the case. At the Assistant Secretary's discretion, the Assistant Secretary may participate as a party or as amicus curiae at any time at any stage of the proceeding. This right to participate includes, but is not limited to, the right to petition for review of a decision of an ALJ, including a decision approving or rejecting a settlement agreement between the complainant and the respondent.
( 2 ) Parties must send copies of documents to OSHA and to the Associate Solicitor, Division of Fair Labor Standards, U.S. Department of Labor, only upon request of OSHA, or when OSHA is participating in the proceeding, or when service on OSHA and the Associate Solicitor is otherwise required by these rules.
( b ) The Securities and Exchange Commission, if interested in a proceeding, may participate as amicus curiae at any time in the proceeding, at the Commission's discretion. At the request of the Securities and Exchange Commission, copies of all documents in a case must be sent to the Commission, whether or not the Commission is participating in the proceeding.
Editorial Note on Part 1904
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 20548, May 3, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-21, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration removed all amendments to part 1904 published at 81 FR 91792, Dec. 19, 2016.

§ 1904.9 Recording criteria for cases involving medical removal under OSHA standards. ( a ) *Basic requirement.* If an employee is medically removed under the medical surveillance requirements of an OSHA standard, you must record the case on the OSHA 300 Log.
( b ) *Implementation* — ( 1 ) *How do I classify medical removal cases on the OSHA 300 Log?* You must enter each medical removal case on the OSHA 300 Log as either a case involving days away from work or a case involving restricted work activity, depending on how you decide to comply with the medical removal requirement. If the medical removal is the result of a chemical exposure, you must enter the case on the OSHA 300 Log by checking the “poisoning” column.
( 2 ) *Do all of OSHA's standards have medical removal provisions?* No, some OSHA standards, such as the standards covering bloodborne pathogens and noise, do not have medical removal provisions. Many OSHA standards that cover specific chemical substances have medical removal provisions. These standards include, but are not limited to, lead, cadmium, methylene chloride, formaldehyde, and benzene.
( 3 ) *Do I have to record a case where I voluntarily removed the employee from exposure before the medical removal criteria in an OSHA standard are met?* No, if the case involves voluntary medical removal before the medical removal levels required by an OSHA standard, you do not need to record the case on the OSHA 300 Log.
Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Units


 Exhibit 10.2 
 JAMBA, INC. 
 NOTICE OF GRANT OF RESTRICTED STOCK
UNITS 
 The Participant has been granted an award of Restricted Stock Units (the “Award”) pursuant to
the Jamba, Inc. 2006 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan (the “Plan”), each of which represents the right to receive on the applicable Settlement Date one (1) share of Common Stock of Jamba, Inc.
(the “Company”), as follows: 
  

									
	Participant:	  	                    	  	Employee ID:	  	                    
				
	Grant Date:	  	                    	  		  	
		
	Number of Restricted Stock Units:	  	                    , subject to adjustment as provided by
the Restricted Stock Units Agreement.
		
	Settlement Date:	  	For each Restricted Stock Unit, except as otherwise provided by the Restricted Stock Units Agreement, the date on which such unit becomes a Vested Unit in accordance
with the vesting schedule set forth below.
		
	Vested Units:	  	Except as provided by the Restricted Stock Units Agreement and provided that the Participant’s Service has not terminated prior to the relevant date, the number
of Vested Units shall cumulatively increase on each respective date set forth below by the number of units set forth opposite such date, as follows:
			
	  	  	 Vesting Date
	    	 Number of Units Vesting


 By their signatures below or by electronic acceptance or authentication in a form authorized by the
Company, the Company and the Participant agree that the Award is governed by this Notice and by the provisions of the Plan and the Restricted Stock Units Agreement, both of which are made a part of this document. The Participant acknowledges that
copies of the Plan, Restricted Stock Units Agreement and the prospectus for the Plan are available on the Company’s internal web site and may be viewed and printed by the Participant for attachment to the Participant’s copy of this Grant
Notice. The Participant represents that the Participant has read and is familiar with the provisions of the Plan and Restricted Stock Units Agreement, and hereby accepts the Award subject to all of their terms and conditions. 
  

							
	JAMBA, INC.	  		 	PARTICIPANT
				
	By:	  	  
	  		 	  

		  		  		 	Signature
	Its:	  	  
	  		 	  

		  		  		 	Date
	Address:	  	6475 Christie Avenue, Suite 150	  		 	  

		  	Emeryville, California 94608	  		 	Address
		  		  		 	  


  

			
	ATTACHMENTS:	  	2006 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan, as amended to the Grant Date; Restricted Stock Units Agreement and Plan Prospectus
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.606 Definitions applicable to this subpart. ( a ) *Apron* —The area along the waterfront edge of the pier or wharf.
( b ) *Bulwark* —The side of a ship above the upper deck.
( c ) *Coaming* —The raised frame, as around a hatchway in the deck, to keep out water.
( d ) *Jacob's ladder* —A marine ladder of rope or chain with wooden or metal rungs.
( e ) *Rail,* for the purpose of § 1926.605, means a light structure serving as a guard at the outer edge of a ship's deck.
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Kyocera
Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: June 29, 2006



/s/ Makoto Kawamura


Name:

Makoto KawamuraTitle:

President and Representative Director (Principal
Executive Officer)




- 1 -
#### § 1912.27 Notice of meetings.

Public notice of any meeting of an advisory committee shall be given by the officer or employee calling the meeting at least fifteen (15) days in advance of the meeting; except when it is impractical to do so, or in an emergency situation, in which event shorter advance notice may be given to the extent that any advance notice is practical. It shall, however, be a general policy to publish notices as far in advance of the meeting as circumstances will permit. Such notice shall be given by publication in the Federal Register. In addition, notice may be given by such other means as press releases.

[48 FR 23185, May 24, 1983]
RODRIZGUS RICHARDSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-2073

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 11, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Frank Sheffield, Judge.

Martin L. Black, Hunter & Associates, P.A., Tallahassee, and Jeffrey E. Lewis, 

General Counsel and Melissa J. Ford, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Office of 

Criminal Conflict, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Justin D. Chapman, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > International Banking Facility Deposit Insurance Act

              														International Banking Facility Deposit Insurance Act, December 26, 1981.						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1043,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of Maurice National Scenic and Recreational River Draft Comprehensive Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement. 

# SUMMARY:

The National Park Service, in cooperation with its partners, has prepared and released a draft Comprehensive Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement for the management, protection, and use of the Maurice National Scenic and Recreational River in New Jersey. The public is invited to review and comment on the draft plan. Comments will be accepted for 45 days from the date of this notice. Please be advised that, if requested, the National Park Service is required to supply the names and addresses of individuals providing comments. For more information about this document: contact Mary Vavra, National Park Service Program Manager by letter or telephone.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Vavra, Program Manager, National Park Service, Philadelphia Support Office, 200 Chestnut Street, 3rd Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19106, (215) 597-9175.

Dated: May 1, 2000.

Len Emerson,

Assistant Regional Director, Human Resources, Acting Regional Director; Northeast Region, National Park Service.

[FR Doc. 00-12315  Filed 3-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
#### § 1919.19 Gear requiring welding.

Chains or other gear which have been lengthened, altered or repaired by welding shall be properly heat treated where necessary, and, before again being put into use, shall be tested and reexamined in the manner set forth in subpart E of this part.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Jean F. Matthews, Deceased. Bank of New York et al., Respondents; G.F. Robert Hanke, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 509]

—In an action to settle an interim trust accounting, G.F. Robert Hanke appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County (Emanuelli, S.), dated September 1, 1998, as granted the motion of the respondents G.F. Robert Hanke, Jr., and John V. Hanke, to compel the production of documents and denied his cross motion for a protective order.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs payable to the appellant by the respondents-respondents, the motion is denied, and the cross motion is granted.

It is well settled that there shall be full disclosure of all evidence, or information leading to evidence, that is material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of an action regardless of the burden of proof *(see,*CPLR 3101 [a]; *Northway Eng’g v Felix Indus.,*77 NY2d 332). Here, however, the banking information concerning the appellant’s accounts at the petitioner trustee Bank of New York is neither material nor relevant to the determination of whether the trustees behaved improperly in distributing the trust funds. Joy, J. P., Goldstein, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Filed 12/19/03 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2003 ND 192

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Steve Parizek, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20030125

Appeal from the District Court of McKenzie County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable David W. Nelson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Ross L. Sundeen, Assistant State’s Attorney, 109 Fifth Street SW, P.O. Box 1260, Watford City, N.D. 58854-1260, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Steve Parizek, pro se, 2521 Circle Drive, Jamestown, N.D. 58401, defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

State v. Parizek

No. 20030125

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Steve Parizek appeals from a Northwest Judicial District Court judgment convicting him of possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of N.D.C.C. §§ 19- 03.4-03 and 19.1-03.1-07(5).  Parizek argues the district court failed to give him a complete transcript to prepare his appeal.  He also argues that the district court did not properly question him to determine whether his guilty plea was voluntary and that he had ineffective assistance of counsel.  The judgment of conviction is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).  We summarily affirm without prejudice to Parizek’s right to raise the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel in post-conviction proceedings.  See State v. Palmer, 2002 ND 5, ¶ 13, 638 N.W.2d 18.

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

William A. Neumann
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Gertrude L. Bacon Respondent, against Hudson Valley Fuel Corporation et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

Submitted March 4, 1937;

decided April 20, 1937.

*676
      *W. D. Coleman*for appellants.

*Thomas P. McLaughlin*for claimant, respondent.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Leon Freedman*of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hubbs, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Loughran, J., concurs on the ground that the carrier did not contest that the accident “ arose out of the employment.” Dissenting: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman and O’Brien, JJ.
<PAGE>1
Exhibit 32 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Citizens First
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report") I, Mary D. Cohron, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:  /s/Mary D. Cohron
        Mary D. Cohron
        Chief Executive Officer



Date:  November 14, 2005

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Citizens First
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report") I, Steve Marcum, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:  /s/ Steve Marcum
         Steve Marcum
        Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 14, 2005
                                        1