alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit10.3**

***OWENS BROKERAGE, LTD.***

Commercial &Investment Properties

PropertyManagement

**LEASEEXTENSION - ANNEX SPACE**

This Rider Amendsthat original Lease dated June 1, 2003 between Kenilworth Systems Inc.[Tenant] and Nassau County P.B.A. [Landlord] for tenancy at 185 Willis Avenue —Mineola, N.Y...[second floor].

This Rider iseffective **August 1**, 2003until May 31, 2006 and applies directly to the annexed space adjacent tothe original Lease premises.

All terms andrequirements of the aforementioned Lease prevail throughout this additionalperiod.  Consolidated rental for both suites will be $2,500.00 permonth.  This **includes four percentannual rental increase** as well as proportionate taxes over thebase year.

*Securitywill increase to a total of $4,255.00.  Two months for the original spaceand one month for the additional space.*
| ACCEPTED: |   | /s/ Herbert Lindo, President             |   | DATED: |   | August 12, 2003 |
|-----------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------|
|      |   | KENILWORTH SYSTEMS INC {TENANT}          |   |   |   |                 |
|      |   |                                     |   |   |   |                 |
| ACCEPTED: |   | /s/ Pete Owens, Agent for Landlord       |   | DATED: |   | August 12, 2003 |
|      |   | NASSAU COUNTY P>B>A> {LANDLORD} |   |   |   |                 |

 

499 Jericho Tpke. *Mineola, New York 11501

Tel: 516-294-0010 *1-888-303-3847 * Fax: 516-294-1278

www.owensbrokerage.com

***OWENS BROKERAGE, LTD.***

Commercial &Investment Properties

PropertyManagement

***LEASE EXTENSION***

THIS RIDER AMENDS THATORIGINAL LEASE DATED 6/1/03 AND SUBSEQUENT EXTENSIONS/AMENDMENTS *[IF ANY]* BETWEEN KENILWORTH SYSTEMS INC. — *[TENANT]* and

THE NASSAU COUNTY P. B.A.— MINEOLA, N.Y. *{LANDLORD}* AS FOLLOWS;

LEASE TERM EXTENDED FORTHE PRESENT LOCATION OCCUPIED BY TENANT AT — 185 Willis Avenue — Mineola, NY.
| FROM | JUNE 1, 2006 | TO: | *MAY 31,  2009 — [three year term]* |
|------|--------------|-----|------------------------------------------|

 

TENANT WILL PROVIDEUPDATED CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE.

ALL OTHER TERMSAND CONDITIONS INCLUDING INCREASES, TAX ADJUSTMENTS AND UTILITY CHARGES PREVAILAS HERETOFORE OR/UNLESS AMENDED.
| AGREED       | Herbert Lindo      | CHAIRMAN AND CEO |
|--------------|--------------------|------------------|
| *[Tenant]*   |               |             |
|         |               |             |
| AGREED       |               |             |
| *[Landlord]* |               |             |
|         |               |             |
| Dated.       | September 7,  2006 |             |
|              |                    |                  |  |  |  |

 

499 Jericho Tpke. * Mineola,New York 11501

Tel: 516-294-0010 *1-888-303-3847 * 516-294-1278

www.owensbrokerage.com

----
Editorial Note on Part 1904
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 20548, May 3, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-21, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration removed all amendments to part 1904 published at 81 FR 91792, Dec. 19, 2016.

§ 1904.31 Covered employees. ( a ) *Basic requirement.* You must record on the OSHA 300 Log the recordable injuries and illnesses of all employees on your payroll, whether they are labor, executive, hourly, salary, part-time, seasonal, or migrant workers. You also must record the recordable injuries and illnesses that occur to employees who are not on your payroll if you supervise these employees on a day-to-day basis. If your business is organized as a sole proprietorship or partnership, the owner or partners are not considered employees for recordkeeping purposes.
( b ) *Implementation* — ( 1 ) *If a self-employed person is injured or becomes ill while doing work at my business, do I need to record the injury or illness?* No, self-employed individuals are not covered by the OSH Act or this regulation.
( 2 ) *If I obtain employees from a temporary help service, employee leasing service, or personnel supply service, do I have to record an injury or illness occurring to one of those employees?* You must record these injuries and illnesses if you supervise these employees on a day-to-day basis.
( 3 ) *If an employee in my establishment is a contractor's employee, must I record an injury or illness occurring to that employee?* If the contractor's employee is under the day-to-day supervision of the contractor, the contractor is responsible for recording the injury or illness. If you supervise the contractor employee's work on a day-to-day basis, you must record the injury or illness.
( 4 ) *Must the personnel supply service, temporary help service, employee leasing service, or contractor also record the injuries or illnesses occurring to temporary, leased or contract employees that I supervise on a day-to-day basis?* No, you and the temporary help service, employee leasing service, personnel supply service, or contractor should coordinate your efforts to make sure that each injury and illness is recorded only once: either on your OSHA 300 Log (if you provide day-to-day supervision) or on the other employer's OSHA 300 Log (if that company provides day-to-day supervision).
```

[Federal Register: January 6, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 3)]
[Notices]               
[Page 856]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr06ja10-30]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Time and Date:  Wednesday, January 6, 2010, 9:30 a.m.-11:30 a.m.

Place:  Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

Status:  Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered

    Compliance Weekly Report--Commission Briefing.
    The staff will brief the Commission on various compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

Contact Person for More Information:  Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: December 28, 2009.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-31294 Filed 1-5-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
```
§ 1690.304 Coordination of proposed issuance. ( a ) *Procedure for publication of proposed issuance.* ( 1 ) If the initiating agency, after consultation with EEOC, proposes to publish the issuance for purposes of receiving comments from the public, it shall confer with EEOC and agree on a mutually agreeable length of time, no less than 15 working days, during which the proposal shall be submitted to all affected Federal agencies pursuant to section 1-304 of the Order. The period of review shall be sufficient to allow all affected agencies reasonable time in which to properly review the proposal.
( 2 ) When an affected agency wishes an extension of the review period, it shall make such request of the initiating agency. If the initiating agency does not grant the request, the affected agency may then make that request of EEOC. EEOC may, at its discretion, grant the additional time requested, whereupon EEOC will inform the initiating agency which shall extend the review period. EEOC shall also inform the initiating agency of the reasons for the extension.
( 3 ) After 15 working days, if the EEOC has not requested an extension of time or otherwise communicated the need for more time to review the proposal, the initiating agency may proceed to publication of the proposed significant issuance for public comment for at least 60 days.
( 4 ) During this public comment period, certain issues may be submitted to employer and employee representatives for comment pursuant to section 2(c) of Executive Order 12044 (Improving Government Regulations) which requires that agencies give the public an early and meaningful opportunity to participate in the development of significant regulations.
( b ) *Procedure for publication of final issuance.* After the period for public comment has closed, the initiating agency shall then incorporate the changes it deems appropriate and forward to EEOC for review, a copy of the document as published, a copy of the document as amended, with changes highlighted, any staff analysis, and a list of commentors. EEOC or affected agencies may review and copy the comments received. The time needed to review these materials shall be agreed on by the EEOC and the initiating agency. After completion of this review, the initiating agency shall formally submit the proposed final issuance to all affected agencies for at least 15 working days prior to publication.
# EUR-Lex - 31998R1298 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998R1298

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1298/98 of 23 June 1998 amending Regulation (EC) No 577/97 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2991/94 laying down standards for spreadable fats and of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1898/87 on the protection of designations used in the marketing of milk and milk products (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 180 , 24/06/1998 P. 0005 - 0005 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1298/98 of 23 June 1998 amending Regulation (EC) No 577/97 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2991/94 laying down standards for spreadable fats and of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1898/87 on the protection of designations used in the marketing of milk and milk products (Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2991/94 of 5 December 1994 laying down standards for spreadable fats (1), and in particular Article 8 thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1898/87 of 2 July 1987 on the protection of designations used in the marketing of milk and milk products (2), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 4(2) thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EC) No 577/97 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 623/98 (4), provides for a period allowing experience to be had of the method for verifying the fat content declaration as described in Annex II, before its application;

Whereas, to allow for a more detailed examination of the viability of the method in the light of the difficulties notified by the economic operators in implementing it, the date from which the method is to apply must be postponed;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committees concerned,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 577/97 is amended as follows:

In Article 2(3) the date '1 July 1998` is replaced by '1 January 1999`.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 June 1998.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 316, 9. 12. 1994, p. 2.

(2) OJ L 182, 3. 7. 1987, p. 36.

(3) OJ L 87, 2. 4. 1997, p. 3.

(4) OJ L 85, 20. 3. 1998, p. 3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000             JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000             APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,442                   4,442
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,013,832               1,013,832
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (651,887)               (651,887)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               513,070                 513,070
<PP&E>                                          85,312                  85,312
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,087                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,202,938                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          473,107                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     4,667,275               2,296,150
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,210,443)             (1,956,325)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,203,139               1,054,376
<SALES>                                      1,217,717                 419,378
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,217,717                 419,378
<CGS>                                         (45,908)                (13,916)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,421,407               1,041,655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,520                   1,811
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,254,118)               (638,004)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,254,118)               (638,004)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)                  (0.04)


</TABLE>
#### EAST CLEVELAND (city) v MONSCHEIN

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9126.

Decided Feb 25, 1929

E A Binyon, Cleveland, for City.

Payer, Minshall, Karch & Kerr, Cleveland, for Monschein.

LEVINE, J.

The claim of plaintiff in error that there was contributory negligence on the part of defendant in error and that the same was shown by her own testimony, is not sustained by the record. The mere fact that she had walked over the manhole a number of times is not conclusive upon that question for the reason that she explained in her testamony that she considered it safe. In other words, she knew of no defect.

There is direct evidence in the record on the part of one witness that she lived nearby, saw the accident, and had noticed the defect in the cover of the catchbasin for one year prior to the plaintiff’s injuries. That she did not permit her son to play around the catch-basin during that time and that there was a space of about an inch between the catch-basin and the edge of the cover over it.

The claim of plaintiff in error that the municipality is not liable because there was neither actual nor constructive notice of a defect is not well taken. It is well settled that when there is a defect in the construction of the cover of the manhole that no notice to the municipality is necessary in order to charge the municipality with negligence.

In the case of City of Cincinnati vs Rossiter, 18 O. Ap. Rep. 1, it was held that:

> “In an action against a municipality to recover for personal injuries received by falling into a manhole in the sidewalk alleged to be defectively constructed, evidence that the cover to the manhole was too small, was warped and when stepped upon in a certain nlace would tilt and jump from its seat, and that the accident happened in such manner, is sufficient to charge the city with notice of such unsafe condition.”

In the opinion on page three, the court said:

> “The charge that the lid was negligently secured, improperly fastened and improperly maintained by the defendant, under this state of the record, would raise the question of defective construction, and the proof sustains that charge.

> The evidence was, that the cover was too small and warped, and when stepped upon in ,a certain place would tilt and jump from its seat, and that the accident happened in this manner. Under these circumstances the city would be charged with. notice and no error intervened on the question of notice.”

The language of that opinion states the law and we are content to follow it. It is not, however, necessary to put our holding upon that basis only, for even assuming that either actual or constructive notice is necessary in a case like the one at bar, the record discloses sufficient evidence to show that the defect existed for a period of over one year, a sufficient length of time to charge constructive notice to the municipality of the existence of the defect.

For the reasons above stated the judgment of the Common Pleas Court is hereby affirmed.

Vickery, PJ, and Sullivan, J, concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 94 (Monday, May 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30979-30980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12081]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP00-226-000]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Request 
Under Blanket Authorization

May 9, 2000.
    Take notice that on April 27, 2000, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), 1250 West Century Avenue, Bismarck, 
North Dakota 58501, filed in Docket No. CP00-226-000 a request pursuant 
to sections 157.205 and 157.211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 
157.205 and 157.211) under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization 
to construct and operate delivery point facilities for service to MI 
Drilling Fluids, LLC (MI Drilling) an industrial end-user in Big Horn 
County, Wyoming under blanket certificate issued in Docket Nos. CP82-
487-000, et al pursuant to section 7 of the NGA, all as more fully set 
forth in the application which is on file with the Commission

[[Page 30980]]

and open to public inspection. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).
    Williston Basin requests authorization to construct and operate 
delivery point facilities to serve MI Drilling Fluids. LLC (MI 
Drilling). It is stated that Williston Basin will use the facilities to 
transport gas daily on a firm basis pursuant to the terms of Williston 
Basin's FTS rate schedule for delivery to MI Drilling. Williston Basin 
estimates the cost of the facilities at $32,100. Williston Basin states 
that the proposed facility will have no significant effect on peak day 
and there is sufficient capacity to render the proposed service without 
disadvantage to its other existing customers.
    Any questions regarding the application may be directed to Keith A. 
Tiggelaar, Manager of Regulatory Affairs, at Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company, P.O. Box 5601, Bismarck, North Dakota 58506-5601.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the 
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, the 
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day 
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and 
not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to section 7 of the NGA.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-12081 Filed 5-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 10.2


                 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

            The following Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Section 906 Certification
is furnished (not filed) to the Securities and Exchange Commission:

            In connection with this annual report on Form 20-F of CNOOC
Limited, we, Liucheng Wei, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Mark Z.L.
Qiu, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, of CNOOC Limited
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       This annual report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in this annual report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
         results of operations of CNOOC Limited.



Date: May 13, 2003



                                    By:  /s/ Liucheng Wei
                                         ------------------------------------
                                    Name:   Liucheng Wei
                                    Title:  Chairman & Chief Executive Officer






                                    By:  /s/ Mark Z.L. Qiu
                                        --------------------------------------
                                    Name:   Mark Z.L. Qiu
                                    Title:  Chief Financial Officer
                                            and Senior Vice President









Note:    A signed original of this written statement required by Section
         906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to CNOOC
         Limited and will be retained by CNOOC Limited and furnished to the
         Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




                                    Ex-62