alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31999R0480 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999R0480

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 480/1999 of 4 March 1999 derogating temporarily from Regulation (EC) No 1445/95 on rules of application for import and export licences in the beef and veal sector **

*
Official Journal L 057 , 05/03/1999 P. 0007 - 0007 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 480/1999 of 4 March 1999 derogating temporarily from Regulation (EC) No 1445/95 on rules of application for import and export licences in the beef and veal sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1633/98 (2), and in particular Articles 9 and 13 thereof,

Whereas Article 10(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1445/95 of 26 June 1995 on rules of application for import and export licences in the beef and veal sector and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2377/80 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2648/98 (4), provides that export licences are to be issued on the fifth working day following that on which the application is lodged, provided that no specific action has been taken by the Commission in the meantime;

Whereas, in view of the public holidays in 1999 and the fact that the Official Journal is not published regularly on those days, the period for reflection of five days is too short to ensure sound management of the market and it should be extended temporarily to seven days;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Beef and Veal,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Notwithstanding Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1445/95, licences for applications lodged from:

- 29 to 31 March 1999,

- 10 to 12 May 1999,

- 28 to 29 October 1999,

- 20 to 29 December 1999,

shall be issued on the seventh working day following that on which the application is lodged, provided no specific action as indicated in Article 10(2) of that Regulation is taken by the Commission in the meantime.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 March 1999.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 148, 28. 6. 1968, p. 24.

(2) OJ L 210, 28. 7. 1998, p. 17.

(3) OJ L 143, 27. 6. 1995, p. 35.

(4) OJ L 335, 10. 12. 1998, p. 39.
#### § 1410.4 Requirements for identification of individuals making requests.

Satisfactory identification (i.e., employ identification number, current address, and verification of signature) must be provided to FMCS prior to review of the record. The requestor will be provided the opportunity to review the records during normal business hours.
#### § 102.109 Intervention.

Any person desiring to intervene must file a motion for intervention, stating the grounds upon which such person claims to have an interest in the petition. The motion must be filed with the Board in Washington, DC.

[82 FR 11767, Feb. 24, 2017]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Institute of Standards and Technology

# AGENCY:

National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 2, notice is hereby given that there will be a meeting of the Board of Overseers of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award on Thursday, June 8, 2000. The Board of Overseers is composed of eleven members prominent in the field of quality management and appointed by the Secretary of Commerce, assembled to advise the Secretary of Commerce on the conduct of the Baldrige Award. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss and review information received from the National Institute of Standards and Technology with the members of the Judges Panel of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. The agenda will include: Review Roles/Responsibilities of Judges and Overseers; Health Care and Education Update; 2000 Baldrige Criteria Changes and Future Criteria Evolution; New Marketing Documents; Discussion of Program Issues, and Key Issues from the June 7 Judges' Meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will convene June 8, 2000, at 8:30 a.m. and adjourn at 3:00 p.m. on June 8, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Administration Building Tenth Floor Conference Room, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Harry Hertz, Director, National Quality Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, telephone number (301) 975-2361.

Dated: May 10, 2000.

Raymond G. Kammer,

Director.

[FR Doc. 00-12441  Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-13-M
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Kyocera Corporation on Form S-8 (File Nos.33-84904, 33-98132and 33-99140) of our report dated June 6, 2003, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Kyocera Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2002 and 2003, and for each of the three years in the periodended March 31, 2003, which report appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers 

Osaka, Japan 

 

September 11, 2003
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4882 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to limit the authority to reserve 

water rights in designating a national monument. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 10, 2020 

Mr. LEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to limit the authority 

to reserve water rights in designating a national monument. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESERVATION OF WATER RIGHTS AT NA4 TIONAL MONUMENTS. 

5 Section 320301 of title 54, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(e) WATER RIGHTS.— 

8 ‘‘(1) NO RESERVATION OF WATER RIGHTS.—In 

9 designating a national monument under subsection 

10 (a), the President may not reserve any implied or 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4882 IS

1 expressed water rights associated with the national 

2 monument. 

3 ‘‘(2) APPLICABLE LAW.—Water rights associ4 ated with a national monument designated under 

5 subsection (a) may be acquired for the national 

6 monument only in accordance with the laws of the 

7 State in which the water rights are located.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
§ 1902.11 General notice. ( a ) Upon receipt of a State plan submitted by an Assistant Regional Director under § 1902.10 whenever the Assistant Secretary proposes to approve the plan, or to give notice that such approval is an issue before him, he shall publish in the Federal Register a notice meeting the requirements of the remaining paragraphs of this section. No later than 5 days following the publication of the notice in the Federal Register, the applying State agency shall publish, or cause to be published, within the State reasonable notice containing the same information.
( b ) The notice shall indicate the submission of the plan and its contents, and any proposals, subjects, or issues involved.
( c ) The notice shall provide that the plan, or copies thereof, shall be available for inspection and copying at the office of the Director, Office of State Programs, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, office of the Assistant Regional Director in whose region the State is located, and an office of the State which shall be designated by the State for this purpose.
( d ) The notice shall afford interested persons an opportunity to submit in writing, data, views, and arguments on the proposal, subjects, or issues involved within 30 days after publication of the notice in the Federal Register. Thereafter the written comments received or copies thereof shall be available for public inspection and copying at the office of the Director, Office of State Programs, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, office of the Assistant Regional Director in whose region the State is located, and an office of the State which shall be designated by the State for this purpose.
( e ) Upon his own initiative, the Assistant Secretary may give notice of an informal or formal hearing affording an opportunity for oral comments concerning the plan.
( f ) In the event no notice of hearing is provided under paragraph (e) of this section it shall be provided that any interested person may request an informal hearing concerning the proposed plan, or any part thereof, whenever particularized written objections thereto are filed within 30 days following publication of the notice in the Federal Register. If the Assistant Secretary finds that substantial objections have been filed, he shall afford a formal or informal hearing on the subjects and issues involved under § 1902.13 or § 1902.14, or shall commence a proceeding under § 1902.17.
[36 FR 20751, Oct. 29, 1971, as amended at 80 FR 49903, Aug. 18, 2015]
§ 100.612 Disputed claims or debts. ( a ) A debtor who disputes a debt should provide the NLRB with an explanation as to why the debt is incorrect within 60 days from the date the initial demand letter was mailed or hand-delivered. The debtor may support the explanation by affidavits, cancelled checks, or other relevant evidence.
( b ) If the debtor's arguments appear to have merit, the NLRB may waive the interest period pursuant to 29 CFR 100.617(c) pending a final determination of the existence or the amount of the debt.
( c ) The NLRB may investigate the facts concerning the dispute and, if it considers it necessary, arrange for a conference at which the debtor may present evidence and any arguments in support of the debtor's position.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 175 (Thursday, September 10, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 54417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-22828]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0602; Amendment No. 71-35]
RIN 2120-AA66

Advisory Circular 91-57 Model Aircraft Operating Standards (June 
9, 1981)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Revision of Advisory Circular 91-57.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 14, 2012, the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 
2012 (Pub. L. 112-95), was issued which contains provisions in section 
336 related to model aircraft operations. AC 91-57 contains provisions 
that are inconsistent with section 336 and therefore the Advisory 
Circular is being revised. The FAA refers model aircraft users to 
section 336 of Public Law 112-95 for information regarding model 
aircraft operations.

DATES: Effective date: September 10, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Willis, Manager, Emerging 
Technologies Team, 493 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Suite 3200, Washington, DC 
20051; telephone (202) 267-8152; email: Randy.Willis@faa.gov or Dean E. 
Griffith, Attorney, International Law, Legislation and Regulations 
Division, Office of the Chief Counsel, Federal Aviation Administration, 
800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 
267-8018; email: dean.griffith@faa.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 1, 2015.
Gary A. Norek,
Manager, Airspace Policy and Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2015-22828 Filed 9-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 37 95

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
Is ai as Pere z
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lDefe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Nor th ern Dis tri ctof I owa - Sio ux Cit y

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Ju ly 2, 20 18 Fi le d: Ju ly 9, 20 18 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re SHEPHERD, ERICKS ON, and STRAS, Ci rcu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

The di st ric t co ur t im

po s ed an ab ov e-Gu id el in es -ran ge se nt en ce up on Is ai as 1 Pere z, who vi ol at ed th e co nd it io ns of h i s s u pe rv is ed rel eas e. Co un se l se ek s

The Hon or ab le Mar k W

. Ben ne tt , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e 1 Nor th ern Dis tri ct of I owa

.p erm is si on to wit hd raw, an d ha s fil ed a br ie f un de r And ers v. Cal ifo rn ia , 38 6 U.S

.

73 8 (1 96 7) , cha ll en gi ng th e rea so na bl en es s o f Pere z’s se nt en ce. We affirm

.

Afte r care fu l rev ie w, w e c o nc lu de th at th e di st ric t co ur t di d no t ab us e it s di sc ret io n in im

po si ng a se nt en ce abo ve th e Gui de li ne s rang e. See Uni te d Stat es v. Mi ll er, 55 7 F.3 d 91 0, 91 5- 18 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ) (ap pl y in g a d e f e r e n t ia l ab us e-o f-d is cret io n st an da rd to th e ev al ua ti on of a rev oc at io n se nt en ce). The reco rd refl ect s th at th e 36 -m on th pr is on se nt en ce an d 8- y ear te rm of su pe rv is ed rel eas e were wit hi n th e rel ev an t st at ut or y m ax im um s, se e 18 U.S.C. § 35 83 (e)( 3) (p ro vi di ng fo r
a m ax im um pr is on te rm of 5 y ears if th e un de rlyin g of fen se is a Cl as s A fel on y ); cf. Uni te d St at es v. Agu ay o- Delg ad o, 22 0 F.3 d 92 6, 93 3 (8 th Ci r. 20 00 ) (ex pl ai ni ng th at th e m ax im

um pe rio d of su pe rv is ed rel eas e fo r a vi ol at io n of 21 U.S.C. § 84 1( b) (1 )(C) is li fe), an d th e co ur t care fu ll y co ns id ered an d di sc us se d th e rel ev an t se ct io n 35 53 (a) fact or s, s ee Un it edSta te s v . Whi te Face , 38 3 F .3d 73 3, 7 40 (8t h C ir. 2 00 4)

.

Acco rd in gl y , we gr an t co un se l le av e to w ith dr aw , an d affi rm th e di st ric t co ur t’s jud gm en t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

JAMES MICHAEL DELAPLANE, JR. 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT 

FROM INACTIVE STATUS 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 157 DB 2014 (No. 1 RST 2015) 

Attorney Registration No. 76170 

(Philadelphia) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 15th day of January, 2015, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated January 6, 2015, is approved and it is ORDERED that 

James Michael Delaplane, Jr., who has been on Inactive Status, has never been 

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, 

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the 

Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the 

Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation 

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
Editorial Note on Part 1615
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1615 appear at 73 FR 39866, July 11, 2008.

§ 1615.101 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to effectuate section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the United States Postal Service.
( b ) The purpose of this part is also to effectuate section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, which requires that when Federal departments and agencies develop, procure, maintain, or use electronic and information technology, they shall ensure accessibility by individuals with disabilities who are Federal employees or applicants, or members of the public.
[54 FR 22749, May 26, 1989, as amended at 73 FR 39866, July 11, 2008]
#### SHOELIN v STATE.

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co.

No. 9556.

Decided Dec. 17, 1928.

Bartholomew, Leeper and -McGill,- Cleveland, for Shoelin.

Carl Shuler, Cleveland; for State.

VICKERY, J.

As to the first claim, which probably ought to have been taken up last, we do not thnk that this record shows a case which comes within the rule laid down in the Bender case. We think there was ample evidence in this case to show that this woman was trifftcking in intoxicating liquors. The utensils on the sink, the dumped liquor, the barrel or crock pf mash, the attempting to get away with a brown jug and the fact that two men were there that got away, together with the fact that she had before been convicted for violating the liquor law, all go to, prove that there was a trafficking in liquor in this place, and this fact, even though a sale could not be proved, took it out of -the rule laid down in the Bender case, or rather put it within the rule laid down in the *52Bender case So on the first ground, as we have taken them up, there is no reason why the court should reverse this judgment.

As to the second ground, an examination of the record will show that the motion was not before the court at the time that this hearing was had. If it was filed, it did not appear to get to the court until after the court had heard the case, and, therefore, we cannot say that any error was committed in that respect.

There being no error in this record for which the judgment should be reversed, it will be affirmed.

Sullivan, P J and Levine. J, concur.
§ 1471.865 How long may my debarment last? ( a ) If the debarring official decides to debar you, your period of debarment will be based on the seriousness of the cause(s) upon which your debarment is based. Generally, debarment should not exceed three years. However, if circumstances warrant, the debarring official may impose a longer period of debarment.
( b ) In determining the period of debarment, the debarring official may consider the factors in § 1471.860. If a suspension has preceded your debarment, the debarring official must consider the time you were suspended.
( c ) If the debarment is for a violation of the provisions of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, your period of debarment may not exceed five years.
# EUR-Lex - 31998D0113 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998D0113

**98/113/EC: Commission Decision of 28 January 1998 amending Decision 87/257/EEC on the list of establishments in the United States of America approved for the purpose of importing fresh meat into the Community (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 031 , 06/02/1998 P. 0018 - 0022 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 28 January 1998 amending Decision 87/257/EEC on the list of establishments in the United States of America approved for the purpose of importing fresh meat into the Community (Text with EEA relevance) (98/113/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems on importation of bovine, ovine and caprine animals and swine, fresh meat or meat products from third countries (1), as last amended by Directive 96/91/EC (2), and in particular Articles 4(1) and 18(1) thereof,

Whereas a list of establishments in the United States of America, approved for the purpose of importing fresh meat into the Community, was drawn up initially by Commission Decision 87/257/EEC (3) as last amended by Decision 97/572/EC (4); whereas that list may be amended at any time in the light of the results of Community inspections carried out in the United States of America;

Whereas negotiations are under way to conclude an agreement with the United States on health measures to protect public health and animal health in the context of trade in livestock and products of animal origin;

Whereas this situation, progress already achieved, and the need to avoid distortion of trade justify the postponement of the deadline established for the landing of certain fresh meat, from 31 January to 31 July 1998; whereas the fixing of this date is without prejudice either to the date of conclusion or to the content of the abovementioned agreement;

Whereas the list of establishments must be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 87/257/EEC is hereby replaced by the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 January 1998.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28.

(2) OJ L 13, 16. 1. 1997, p. 26.

(3) OJ L 121, 9. 5. 1987, p. 46.

(4) OJ L 236, 27. 8. 1997, p. 14.

ANNEX

>TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit (99)

Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC

Asahi & Co. has represented to Komatsu Ltd. that its audit was subject to the
firm's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to
provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance
with professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity of Asahi &
Co. personnel working on the audit, availability of U.S. national office
consultation and availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Asahi & Co.
to conduct the relevant portions of the audit. Asahi & Co. is a member firm of
Andersen Worldwide S.C. and uses the trade name " Arthur Andersen".

Very truly yours,

                                                        KOMATSU LTD.
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                         (Registrant)

                                                         /s/ Kenji Kinoshita
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                         (Signature)

                                                 Kenji Kinoshita
                                                 Executive Officer

Date: July 23, 2002