alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John Petrillo *vs.*The Connecticut Company.

Third Judicial District, Bridgeport,

October Term, 1917.

Prentice, C. J., Roraback, Wheeler, Beach and Shumway, Js.

A judgment of nonsuit is properly rendered if the evidence — as in the present case — unmistakably shows that the plaintiff’s negligence was the proximate cause of the collision between his automobile and the defendant’s trolley-car, and does not disclose a situation in which the plaintiff can successfully appeal to the doctrine of supervening negligence.

Argued October 24th —

decided December 15th, 1917.

Action to recover damages for injuries to the plaintiff’s automobile through a collision with a trolley-car alleged to have been caused by negligence of the defendant’s motorman, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County where the plaintiff was nonsuited in a trial to the jury before *Simpson, J.,*and from the refusal to set aside this judgment the plaintiff appealed.

*No error.*

*Joseph Koletshy,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Seth W. Baldwin,*for the appellee (defendant).

Per Curiam.

Upon the evidence presented by the plaintiff, assumed to be true, it would have been impossible for a trier reasonably to find that he was free from contributory negligence. There was no substantial evidence to that effect worthy of being weighed and considered by the jury. On the contrary, the evidence unmistakably shows that the plaintiff’s negligence was a proximate cause of the head-on collision between his car and the defendant’s, in that he failed to discover, as in the exercise of ordinary prudence he should have *236done, the presence of the defendant’s trolley-car approaching him from the front when it was some distance away and plainly visible, or omitted to take with reasonable promptness the simple precaution for his safety of turning his machine off from the defendant’s tracks, over one rail of which his right-hand wheels at the time extended.

Nor does the evidence disclose a situation in which the plaintiff might successfully appeal to the doctrine of supervening negligence. It nowhere appears that the defendant’s motorman, after he became aware, or in the exercise of due care should have become aware, of the plaintiff’s peril and that he reasonably could not or would not save himself from harm, could by means reasonably within his power have prevented the collision which followed. *Nehring*v. *Connecticut Co.,*86 Conn. 109, 120, 121, 84 Atl. 301, 524.

There is no error.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elgrande International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael F. Holloran, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael F. Holloran

Michael F. Holloran

Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer



April 26, 2006
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 26, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-1282

Lower Tribunal No. 22-11560

________________

City of Miami,

Appellant,

vs.

Mia Casa, LLC,

Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade 

County, Lourdes Simon, Judge.

Victoria Méndez, City Attorney, and Eric J. Eves, Assistant City 

Attorney, for appellant.

Gunster Yoakley & Stewart, P.A., and Amy Brigham Boulris and 

Michael B. Green, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See City of Miami Beach v. Clevelander Ocean, L.P., 338 

So. 3d 16, 23 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (concluding that “competent, substantial 

evidence support[ed] the decision by the trial court to preserve the status 

quo pending the final resolution of the issues presented”); see also TJ Mgmt. 

Grp., L.L.C v. Zidon, 990 So. 2d 623, 625 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (“In considering 

a request for an injunction, the trial court has wide discretion to grant, deny, 

modify or dissolve a temporary injunction, and an appellate court will not 

intercede unless an abuse of discretion has been shown.”); Sun Cruz 

Casinos, L.L.C v. City of Hollywood, 844 So. 2d 681, 684–85 (Fla. 4th DCA 

2003) (“Although the party raising estoppel must prove the required elements 

by clear and convincing evidence, the trial court’s findings should not be 

overturned on appeal unless the findings are clearly erroneous or lacking in 

evidentiary support.”) (citation omitted); Bruce v. City of Deerfield Beach, 423 

So. 2d 404, 406 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (explaining that the concept of 

administrative exhaustion “is not a strict jurisdictional matter but a flexible 

concept tailored to the administrative statutes and circumstances”) 

(quotation omitted).
Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No.
333-71441, 333-55891, 333-55865, 333-55867, 33-30137, 33-63086 and 2-93666) of
our report dated March 5, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statement and financial statement schedule of Keystone Consolidated Industries,
Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years ended
December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, which report is included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.




Dallas, Texas
March 26, 1999
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 87 

To permit the cancellation of certain loans under the Robert T. Stafford 

Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To permit the cancellation of certain loans under the Robert 

T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CANCELLATION OF LOANS. 

4 Section 2(a) of the Community Disaster Loan Act of 

5 2005 (Public Law 109–88) is amended by striking ‘‘Pro6 vided further, That notwithstanding section 417(c)(1) of 

7 the Stafford Act, such loans may not be canceled:’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 87 IS

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 The amendment made by this Act shall take effect 

3 as though enacted as part of the Community Disaster 

4 Loan Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–88). 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
|                         | /s/ TERRY G. ROUSSEL                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:      November 12, 2010 | Terry      G. RousselChief      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) ofCornerstone      Ventures, Inc., Managing Member ofCornerstone      Industrial Properties, LLC, the Managing Member ofCornerstone      Realty Fund, LLC |
|                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                         | /s/ SHARON C. KAISER                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| Date:      November 12, 2010 | Sharon      C. KaiserChief      Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) ofCornerstone      Ventures, Inc., Managing Member ofCornerstone      Industrial Properties, LLC, the Managing Member ofCornerstone      Realty Fund, LLC |

----
##### 



Exhibit 99(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delphi
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, J. T. Battenberg III, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|   |                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|  
|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.

|                 |  |                                                                                                                                                                                 
|---------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|October 16, 2002 |  | /s/ J. T. BATTENBERG III
    -----------------------------------------------------
    J. T. Battenberg III
    Chairman of the Board,
    Chief Executive Officer and President
<PAGE>47


Exhibit 32 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
           pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Citizens First
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report") I, Mary D. Cohron, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company


By:  /s/Mary D. Cohron
            Mary D. Cohron
            Chief Executive Officer



Date:  August 13, 2004

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Citizens First
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report") I, Bill Wright, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company


By:  /s/ Bill D. Wright
             Bill D. Wright
             Chief Financial Officer


Date: August 13, 2004
                                                47
# EUR-Lex - 32000E0346 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000E0346

**Council Common Position of 26 April 2000 extending and amending Common Position 96/635/CFSP on Burma/Myanmar **

*
Official Journal L 122 , 24/05/2000 P. 0001 - 0005 *

Council Common Position

of 26 April 2000

extending and amending Common Position 96/635/CFSP on Burma/Myanmar

(2000/346/CFSP)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 15 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Common Position 96/635/CFSP of 28 October 1996 on Burma/Myanmar(1) expires on 29 April 2000.

(2) There are severe and systematic violations of human rights in Burma, with continuing and intensified repression of civil and political rights, and the Burmese authorities have taken no steps towards democracy and national reconciliation.

(3) In this connection, the restrictive measures taken under Common Position 96/635/CFSP should be extended and strengthened.

(4) Action by the Community is needed in order to implement some of the measures cited below,

HAS ADOPTED THIS COMMON POSITION:

Article 1

Point 5(b) of Common Position 96/635/CFSP shall be replaced by the following:

"(b) introduces the following additional measures:

(i) in order to prevent the entry into, and transit through, the territory of the Member States by senior members of the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC), Burmese authorities in the tourism sector, senior members of the military, the Government or the security forces who formulate, implement or benefit from policies that impede Burma/Myanmar's transition to democracy, no visas for entry or transit shall be issued to any persons, whose names are listed in the Annex and their families.

By agreement of all Member States, the ban on the issue of an entry visa for the Foreign Minister may be waived where it is in the interests of the European Union;

(ii) high-level bilateral government (Ministers and officials of political director level and above) visits to Burma/Myanmar will be suspended;

(iii) funds held abroad by persons referred to in (i) will be frozen;

(iv) no equipment which might be used for internal repression or terrorism will be supplied to Burma/Myanmar."

Article 2

Common Position 96/635/CFSP is hereby extended until 29 October 2000.

Article 3

This Common Position shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Article 4

This Common Position shall be published in the Official Journal.

Done at Brussels, 26 April 2000.

For the Council

The President

J. Gama

(1) OJ L 287, 8.11.1996, p. 1. Common Position as last extended by Common Position 1999/670/CFSP (OJ L 267, 15.10.1999, p. 1).

ANNEX

Persons to whom points 5(b)(i) and (iii) apply

>TABLE>
§ 1918.42 Hatch beam and pontoon bridles. ( a ) Hatch beam and pontoon bridles shall be: ( 1 ) Long enough to reach the holes, rings, or other lifting attachments on the hatch beams and pontoons easily;
( 2 ) Of adequate strength to lift the load safely; and
( 3 ) Properly maintained, including covering or blunting of protruding ends in wire rope splices.
( b ) Bridles for lifting hatch beams shall be equipped with toggles, shackles, or hooks, or other devices of such design that they cannot become accidentally dislodged from the hatch beams with which they are used. Hooks other than those described in this section may be used only when they are hooked into the standing part of the bridle. Toggles, when used, shall be at least one inch (2.54 cm) longer than twice the largest diameter of the holes into which they are placed.
( c ) Bridles used for lifting pontoons and plugs shall have the number of legs required by the design of the pontoon or plug, and all of which shall be used. Where any use of a bridle requires fewer than the number of legs provided, idle legs shall be hung on the hook or ring, or otherwise prevented from swinging free.
( d ) At least two legs of all strongback and pontoon bridles shall be equipped with a lanyard at least eight feet (2.44 m) long and in good condition. The bridle end of the lanyard shall be of chain or wire.
[62 FR 40202, July 25, 1997, as amended at 65 FR 40944, June 30, 2000]
**EXHIBIT 21**SUBSIDIARIES OF LANCE, INC.   Name of Subsidiary State/Province of Incorporation   Lance Mfg. LLC (1) North Carolina   Caronuts, Inc. (1) North Carolina   Vista Bakery, Inc. (1) North Carolina   Cape Cod Potato Chip Company LLC (1) Massachusetts   Lanhold Investments, Inc. (1) Delaware   Tamming Foods Ltd. (2) Ontario   Fresno Ventures, Inc. (1) North Carolina (1) Lance, Inc. owns 100% of the outstanding voting equity securities. (2) Subsidiary of Lanhold Investments, Inc., which owns 100% of the outstanding voting equitysecurities.
SERVED NOVEMBER 7, 2011 

OEPARTMENTOF^ 

•JOCKET OPERATIONS 

70!1 ^^0V - 8 P y- 32 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC 

FAA DOCKET No. CP |TO BE ASSIGNED! 

(Civil Penalty Aclioii) 

DMSNo. FAA-20I1-0774 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. CP (TO BE ASSIGNEDl 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNo. FAA-2011-0776 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. CP |TO BE ASSIGNED! 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNo. FAA-2011-0777 
IN THE MATTER OF 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. CP |T0 BE ASSIGNEDl 

(Civil Penalty Aclion) 

DMSNo. FAA-20II-0778 

ORDERS OF DISMISSAL 

On July 22, 2011, the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter referred to as 

"Complainant") filed Complaints in these matters. On July 18, 2011, Respondent 

Continental Airlines, Inc. (hereinafter "Respondent") had requested a hearing in each 

matter. On November 7, 2011, Complainant collectively withdrew its Complaints in 

these cases, civing the cases' sclllcment. 

14 C.F.R. if 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

atlorncy may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint ov a party withdraws vlie request for a lieariiig and the 

an.swer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal of Complaints having been read and 

considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Complainant's Withdrawal of Complaints be and is hereby granted; and 

2. These proceedings be and are hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

• ^ 

Attachment ~ Service List 
FDMS NOS. FAA-201J-0774, 

0776, 077 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC.20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WIOOO' 

ONE COPY 

Thomas Newton Boiling, Respondent's Counsel 

Vice President and Associate General Counsel 

United Airlines and Continental Airlines, Inc., Respondent 

77 W. Wacker Drive-16'^ Floor 

Chicago, IL 60601 

TEL 312-997-8068 

FAX: 312-997-8068 

Tim Duff, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel, ASW-7 

Southwest Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd. 

Ft. Worth, TX 76193-0007 

TEL 817-222-5099 

FAX 817-222-5945/5092 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

OfTice of Hearings, M-20, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202- 366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WI000, Washington, 

DC 20591; AltcnUon: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
O rder filed March 21 , 2013



## In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

____________



### No. 11

- 1 2

- 00 326

- CR

__________

AMMIE LUCILLE SMITH , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR137834

O R D E R

Ammie Lucille Smith, through her court

- appointed trial counsel, filed a timely notice of

appeal. Smith’s trial counsel was thereafter permitted by the trial court to withdraw as counsel

for Smith

. The trial court has not appointed counsel for appeal

. When this court notified Smith

that her brief was due, we recei ved a pro se response indicating that Smith had contacted the trial

court regarding the appointment of an attorney and that she needed time to find an attorney. We

abate this appeal.2 W e abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court so that it may determine the

following:

1. Whether Smith desires to prosecute h er appeal ;

2. W hether Smith is indigent ;

3. If not indigent, whether Smith has retained counsel for h er appeal ; and

4. If indigent, whether Smith desires to have counsel appoint ed to represent h er i n this appeal or whether, after being warned of the dangers and disadvantages of

self

- representation, Smith competently and intelligently chooses to exercise the
right to represent her self

. The trial court is directed to make appropriate findings and reco mmendations and to appoint

counsel if appropriate

. The trial court clerk is directed to prepare and forward to this court a

clerk’s record containing the findings, recommendations, and any orders of the trial court. If a

hearing is held, t he court report er is directed to prepare and forward to this court the reporter’s

record from the hearing. The se records are due to be filed in this court on or before April 22

,

2013

. Smith’s brief will be due to be filed in this court within thirty days after the d ate this

appeal is reinstated.

The appeal is abated.

PER CURIAM

March 21 , 2013

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J.
[Cite as Little Turtle Civic Assn., Inc. v. Columbus, 2021-Ohio-4655.]

 

{¶1} On November 30, 2021, a Special Master issued a Report and 

Recommendation in this public-records case. The Special Master recommends (1) 

denying, as moot, Requester’s claim for production of records, and (2) assessing costs 

equally between the parties. 

{¶2} Neither party has timely filed written objections to the Report and 

Recommendation, as permitted by R.C. 2743.75(F)(2). Pursuant to R.C. 2743.75(F)(2), 

if neither party timely objects to a special master’s report and recommendation, then this 

Court is required to “promptly issue a final order adopting the report and 

recommendation, unless it determines that there is an error of law or other defect 

evident on the face of the report and recommendation.” 

{¶3} The Court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on 

the face of the Special Master’s Report and Recommendation of November 30, 2021. 

The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Court costs are assessed to 

Requester 

LITTLE TURTLE CIVIC ASSOCIATION, 

INC. 

 Requester 

 v. 

CITY OF COLUMBUS (CITY COUNCIL, 

AND DEPT OF PUBLIC SERVICE) 

 Respondent 

Case No. 2021-00370PQ 

Judge Patrick E. Sheeran 

JUDGMENT ENTRY 
Case No. 2021-00370PQ -2- JUDGMENT ENTRY 

and Respondent equally. The Clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment 

and its date of entry upon the journal. 

 

 PATRICK E. SHEERAN 

 Judge 

Filed December 15, 2021 

Sent to S.C. Reporter 1/21/22