alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 93 (Friday, May 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12043]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Environmental Research Forum 
(``PERF'') Project

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 21, 1999, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Exxon Research & 
Engineering Company (``ER&E'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) the 
nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are 
Exxon Research and Engineering Company, Florham Park, NJ; Phillips 
Petroleum Company, Bartlesville, OK; Sunoco, Inc., Philadelphia, PA; 
Mobil Technology Company, Paulsboro, NJ; Conoco, Inc., Ponca City, OK; 
CITGO, Corpus Christi, TX; and BP-Amoco Oil International, Ltd., 
Middlesex, United Kingdom. The nature an objectives of the venture are 
the development of guidelines for carbon steel metallurgy and welding 
procedures for HF alkylations plants. Participation in this project 
will remain open until issuance of the final project report. The 
participants intend to file additional written notifications disclosing 
all changes in membership.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-12043 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### § 95.19 Hawaii Mountainous Area.

The following islands of the State of Hawaii: Kauai, Oahu, Molokai, Lanai, Kehoolawe, Maui, and Hawaii.

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC26SE91.007/EC26SE91.007_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC26SE91.007/EC26SE91.007_original_size.png)

[Amdt. 88, [27 FR 4536](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/27-FR-4536), May 8, 1962. Redesignated by Amdt. 1-1, [28 FR 6719](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/28-FR-6719), June 29, 1963]
§ 1209.05 Closing of meetings; reasons therefor. ( a ) Except where the Board determines that the public interest requires otherwise, meetings, or portions thereof, shall not be open to public observation where the deliberations concern the issuance of a subponea, the Board's participation in a civil action or proceeding or an arbitration, or the initiation, conduct or disposition by the Board of any matter involving a determination on the record after opportunity for a hearing, or any court proceeding collateral or ancillary thereto.
( b ) Except where the Board determines that the public interest requires otherwise, the Board also may close meetings, or portions thereof, when the deliberations concern matters or information falling within the scope of 5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(1) (secret matters concerning national defense or foreign policy); (c)(2) (internal personnel rules and practices); (c)(3) (matters specifically exempted from disclosure by statute); (c)(4) (trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential); (c)(5) (matters of alleged criminal conduct or formal censure); (c)(6) (personal information where disclosure would cause a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy); (c)(7) (certain materials or information from investigatory files compiled for law enforcement purposes); or (c)(9)(B) (disclosure would significantly frustrate implementation of a proposed agency action).
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5THCIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-41162

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

ADOLFO MORENO-RIOS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(M-96-CR-117-1)

July 28, 1997

Before WISDOM, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Adolfo Moreno-Rios appeals his conviction for conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute more than fifty kilograms of

marijuana. He contends that his arrest, executed without a

warrant, was not supported by probable cause. We conclude, based

upon the testimony presented at the hearing on the motion to
2

suppress, that the arresting officers had probable cause to

arrest the defendant. See United States v. Carrillo-Morales, 27

F.3d 1054 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
§ 91.613 Materials for compartment interiors. ( a ) No person may operate an airplane that conforms to an amended or supplemental type certificate issued in accordance with SFAR No. 41 for a maximum certificated takeoff weight in excess of 12,500 pounds unless within 1 year after issuance of the initial airworthiness certificate under that SFAR the airplane meets the compartment interior requirements set forth in § 25.853 (a), (b), (b-1), (b-2), and (b-3) of this chapter in effect on September 26, 1978.
( b ) Thermal/acoustic insulation materials. For transport category airplanes type certificated after January 1, 1958: ( 1 ) For airplanes manufactured before September 2, 2005, when thermal/acoustic insulation is installed in the fuselage as replacements after September 2, 2005, the insulation must meet the flame propagation requirements of § 25.856 of this chapter, effective September 2, 2003, if it is: ( i ) Of a blanket construction or
( ii ) Installed around air ducting.
( 2 ) For airplanes manufactured after September 2, 2005, thermal/acoustic insulation materials installed in the fuselage must meet the flame propagation requirements of § 25.856 of this chapter, effective September 2, 2003.
[Doc. No. 18334, 54 FR 34318, Aug. 18, 1989, as amended by Amdt. 91-279, 68 FR 45083, July 31, 2003; Amdt. 91-290, 70 FR 77752, Dec. 30, 2005]
§ 61.199 Reinstatement requirements of an expired flight instructor certificate. ( a ) *Flight instructor certificates.* The holder of an expired flight instructor certificate who has not complied with the flight instructor renewal requirements of § 61.197 may reinstate that flight instructor certificate and ratings by filing a completed and signed application with the FAA and satisfactorily completing one of the following reinstatement requirements: ( 1 ) A flight instructor certification practical test, as prescribed by § 61.183(h), for one of the ratings held on the expired flight instructor certificate.
( 2 ) A flight instructor certification practical test for an additional rating.
( 3 ) For military instructor pilots, provide a record showing that, within the preceding 6 calendar months from the date of application for reinstatement, the person— ( i ) Passed a U.S. Armed Forces instructor pilot or pilot examiner proficiency check; or
( ii ) Completed a U.S. Armed Forces' instructor pilot or pilot examiner training course and received an additional aircraft rating qualification as a military instructor pilot or pilot examiner that is appropriate to the flight instructor rating sought.
( b ) *Flight instructor ratings.* ( 1 ) A flight instructor rating or a limited flight instructor rating on a pilot certificate is no longer valid and may not be exchanged for a similar rating or a flight instructor certificate.
( 2 ) The holder of a flight instructor rating or a limited flight instructor rating on a pilot certificate may be issued a flight instructor certificate with the current ratings, but only if the person passes the required knowledge and practical test prescribed in this subpart for the issuance of the current flight instructor certificate and rating.
( c ) *Certain military instructors and examiners.* The holder of an expired flight instructor certificate issued prior to October 20, 2009, may apply for reinstatement of that certificate by presenting the following: ( 1 ) A record showing that, since the date the flight instructor certificate was issued, the person passed a U.S. Armed Forces instructor pilot or pilot examiner proficiency check for an additional military rating; and
( 2 ) A knowledge test report that shows the person passed a knowledge test on the aeronautical knowledge areas listed under § 61.185(a) appropriate to the flight instructor rating sought and the knowledge test was passed within the preceding 24 calendar months prior to the month of application.
( d ) *Expiration date.* The requirements of paragraph (c) of this section will expire on August 26, 2019.
[Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16298, Apr. 4, 1997, as amended by Amdt. 61-104, 63 FR 20289, Apr. 23, 1998; Amdt. 61-124, 74 FR 42562, Aug. 21, 2009; Amdt. 61-142, 83 FR 30279, June 27, 2018]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

VICKIE L. JEANS,

Respondent

v.

B. BRAUN MEDICAL INC., A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, B.

BRAUN INTERVENTIONAL SYSTEMS INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND B. BRAUN MEDICAL S.A.S., A FRENCH CORPORATION,

Petitioners :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 25 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of May, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### § 16.303 Settlement.

The applicant and agency counsel may agree on a proposed settlement of the award before final action on the application, either in connection with a settlement of the underlying proceeding, or after the underlying proceeding has been concluded, in accordance with the agency's standard settlement procedure. If a prevailing party and agency counsel agree on a proposed settlement of an award before an application has been filed, the application shall be filed with the proposed settlement.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  23 LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended
March  31,  2006,  as  filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the  undersigned,
Robert  P.  Johnson, President of AEI Fund Management XXI,  Inc.,
the  Managing Member of the Company, and Patrick W. Keene,  Chief
Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc., each certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              May 5, 2006



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              May 5, 2006
#### § 33.72 Hydraulic actuating systems.

Each hydraulic actuating system must function properly under all conditions in which the engine is expected to operate. Each filter or screen must be accessible for servicing and each tank must meet the design criteria of § 33.71.

[Amdt. 33-6, 39 FR 35467, Oct. 1, 1974]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 16, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 31101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12255]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA No. 00-917; MM Docket No. 99-134; RM-9543 and RM-9572]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Drummond and Victor, MT

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document allots Channel 268C to Drummond, Montana, in 
response to a petition filed by the Battani Corporation and allots 
Channel 250C3 to Victor, Montana, in response to a petition filed by 
Mountain West Broadcasting. See 64 FR 24996, May 10, 1999. The 
coordinates for Channel 268C at Drummond are 46-16-47 and 113-31-05. 
The coordinates for Channel 250C3 at Victor are 46-25-06 and 114-08-54. 
Canadian concurrence has been obtained for Channel 268C at Drummond. 
Allotment of Channel 250C3 at Victor is conditioned on concurrence of 
the Canadian Government in accordance with the 1991 Canada-USA FM 
Broadcast Agreement. With this action, this proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective June 9, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 99-134, adopted April 12, 2000, and released 
April 25, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is available 
for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the 
Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. The 
complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 20036, (202) 857-3800, 
facsimile (202) 857-3805.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Montana, is 
amended by adding Drummund, Channel 268C and Victor, Channel 250C3.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-12255 Filed 5-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```

[113th Congress Public Law 127]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

Public Law 113-127
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To take certain Federal lands located in El Dorado County, California, 
into trust for the benefit of the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians, 
     and for other purposes. <<NOTE: July 16, 2014 -  [H.R. 2388]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LAND INTO TRUST FOR THE SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND OF MIWOK 
                              INDIANS.

    (a) In General.--The land described in subsection (b) is hereby 
taken into trust for the benefit of the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok 
Indians, subject to valid existing rights and management agreements 
related to easements and rights-of-way.
    (b) Land Description.--The land taken into trust pursuant to 
subsection (a) is the approximately 40.852 acres of Federal land under 
the administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management 
identified as ``Conveyance boundary'' on the map titled ``Shingle 
Springs Land Conveyance/Draft'' and dated June 7, 2012, including 
improvements and appurtenances thereto.
    (c) Gaming.--Class II and class III gaming under the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) shall not be permitted at any 
time on the land taken into trust pursuant to subsection (a).

    Approved July 16, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2388:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113-95 (Comm. on Natural Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 113-97 (Comm. on Indian Affairs).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 159 (2013):
                                    Dec. 3, considered and passed House.
                                                        Vol. 160 (2014):
                                    June 26, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
OFFICE OF THE A-ITORNEY GENERAL OF TElU& AUSTIN 

### 3%

Eenombla Goorgr Ii. shrpprrd Qeiaptroller oi Publio MOounts hImtin. Taxelr Rear Sir: Opiaioa 80. 80: should tba iiQh*ay

lett*r et #oToiof thts dopart-

### 383

Honorabla George 8. Sheppard, page 2

In oonatruing th6 ebove 8aetion of SatiateBill Ho. 127, it must be borne in zalndthat tha prias funotfon of this depsrtmant, as ~11 aa t&et or tha court, Is to detamf.ne ths laglsletlre 

## intent, and thut oooatructloa of a atstuta should be adOptadwblah is reasonable andvhioh 211 affeotuata tha purpoea of tlw Leglalaturo ?a adopting S.*w.Imperial Irrigation Co. v. Jayno, 104 Tax. 395, 138 575. Ollrar v. Stata, 1u 8. V. 604. A stat&to 1 shouldnot ba gitan a construotion that will rmndarIt rain and purpoaelsse, If it 06x1 br otbexwlor oonatrurd. 

### Stoltv. Karirn (Clv. App.1, 191 8. 7?. 600.



### Asyoustate 

### Ingaurlatter, there 

### lrnoap*oirla 'approprletlon for portam rtasps made fbr tha dlrl8lon otrlorre(flrld and distrlot otiiorrr.) Part of the ltemizrd funds appropriated for these offices wara vetoed by t& Gora-nor, aul the fund8 nowbeing umd ror the operation 814 raaintrnanoo oi there eald offium are darlvod ma the balanon fund approprlatad by the rldar found at the oanolurlon of tha U3way motion of Senate Bill No. 427. (For further deta118, see oonfarenor oplnlon lo. 3OS0,Attornay Ganaral*s Dopartwmt

.)

*PRa postage ataag alaus in sac&ion 2 or sanatr Bill WO. L27, quota4 in the first part ot this lattw, apfli68 t0 811 pWOh!WW Or pOSt6gO 6t8CQ?8 ~8dO ~~OAQ ftUtd8 appreprlatrd by said bill. 'Phi6 claws olrarl~ lndl~at~8 t&t both in thr ca8a of spaoifie postage applPpr1atlOn andwherr oontlngant funds arC’ used, th6 **rtmpe must**  **be** purohassd by voucharn 

### madapayabla to tha United Sates Voat ottloo, for even in tha lattar 0atmwham oontingrnt funds are uaad wamust hold that suoh PurObaSa*Is OOLLtrmplatod and intsndrdby the Laglrlatura or 

### suohaVPzOVrlatlon could not ba uaadto pprohare lkamva.

‘in 

### ouropinion, tha .&gialatlva intar& was 

### olrarly

to require all postage StMpe $0 be pUNhS*Q by +ouohera madePayable to tha United gtakaa post of$iOa. merafore, pu 

### areadrlmd that you should raqu*a tba swt8 ni&hrrcrf

mpartmue to submit rouchara **rawatlne** the **~SSI~~ROS**

of poatag6 warraat8 In favor Of the Unlt*Q **statsi** Foatnmoter.&norablg George II. Sheppard, 

### pegs 3

T&sforagolng rclprerents the aonalderod opinion of tbls depnrtamnt. Tours vary txulr
ATTORHBT ODYERAL OF SpIFxhS

&;&
Document # 12-084RC

November 6, 2012

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building ground floor,

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Subject: Request for Extension of Exemption No. 10242 from 14 CFR (FAR Section) – Part: 

121.434 (c)(1)(ii) Expiring on 04/30/2013.

Dear Sirs:

Thank you for granting Spirit Airlines Exemption No. 10242 from 14 CFR (FAR Section) – Part: 

121.434 (c)(1)(ii) on 4/12/2011.

Spirit Airlines respectfully requests an extension for exemption No. 10242 (Docket Number 

FAA-2011-0253) which expires on 4/30/2013. Please extend this exemption for the period of 

two years (4/30/2015).

This exemption has allowed our company to focus on the timely and competent completion of 

the observation flight and better utilization of qualifying PICs.

Should you have any questions or if you require additional information about this request,

please do not hesitate to contact me.

Regards,

Joseph T. Houghton

VP Flight Operations

2800 Executive Way

Miramar, FL 33025

954-447-4947

954-447-8081 fax

Spiritair.com
#### § 1608.12 Equal employment opportunity plans adopted pursuant to section 717 of title VII.

If adherence to an Equal Employment Opportunity Plan, adopted pursuant to section 717 of title VII, and approved by an appropriate official of the U.S. Civil Service Commission, is the basis of a complaint filed under title VII, or is alleged to be the justification for an action under title VII, these Guidelines will apply in a manner similar to that set forth in § 1608.5. The Commission will issue regulations setting forth the procedure for processing such complaints.
**MPD** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 1 9 - 0 632 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GREGORY M. SMITH ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 6 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including October 1 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 24 2020

07/24/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0632
#### § 450.39 Use of safety element approval.

If an applicant proposes to use any vehicle, safety system, process, service, or personnel for which the FAA has issued a safety element approval under part 414 of this chapter, the FAA will not reevaluate that safety element during a license application evaluation to the extent its use is within its approved scope.
§ 1471.110 What is the purpose of the nonprocurement debarment and suspension system? ( a ) To protect the public interest, the Federal Government ensures the integrity of Federal programs by conducting business only with responsible persons.
( b ) A Federal agency uses the nonprocurement debarment and suspension system to exclude from Federal programs persons who are not presently responsible.
( c ) An exclusion is a serious action that a Federal agency may take only to protect the public interest. A Federal agency may not exclude a person or commodity for the purposes of punishment.