alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1602.11 Additional reporting requirements.

The Commission reserves the right to require reports, other than that designated as the Employer Information Report EEO-1, about the employment practices of individual employers or groups of employers whenever, in its judgment, special or supplemental reports are necessary to accomplish the purposes of title VII, the ADA, GINA, or the PWFA. Any system for the requirement of such reports will be established in accordance with the procedures referred to in section 709(c) of title VII, section 107 of the ADA, section 207(a) of GINA, or section 104 of the PWFA and as otherwise prescribed by law.

[31 FR 2833, Feb. 17, 1966, as amended at 56 FR 35755, July 26, 1991; 74 FR 63983, Dec. 7, 2009; 89 FR 11170, Feb. 14, 2024]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [ES-960-9820-BJ-ES03] ES-50670, Group 199, Florida 

The plat of the dependent resurvey of a portion of the south boundary of the Moses E. Levy Grant, a portion of the south and north boundaries, the east boundary, a portion of the subdivisional lines and the corrective dependent resurvey of a portion of the subdivisional lines, Township 17 South, Range 27 East, Tallahassee Meridian, Florida, will be officially filed in Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia at 7:30 a.m., on June 12, 2000. 

The survey was requested by the U.S. Forest Service. 

All inquiries or protests concerning the technical aspects of the survey must be sent to the Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Eastern States, Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153, prior to 7:30 a.m., June 12, 2000. 

Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and prepayment of the appropriate fee.

Dated: April 27, 2000.

Stephen G. Kopach, 

Chief Cadastral Surveyor.

[FR Doc. 00-11965 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
#### § 1405.10 Effect on employment ceilings.

Effective October 1, 1980, part-time employees will be counted on the basis of the fractional part of the 40-hour week actually worked. For example two employees each working twenty hours a week will count as one employee.
Exhibit 32.2

HORIZON HOLDING CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

The undersigned, Steven Weldon, in his capacities as Chief Financial Officer, of Inverted Paradigms Corporation do each hereby certify that the Form
10-KSB of Inverted Paradigms Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information
contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inverted Paradigms Corporation

This certification is given by the undersigned solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is subject to the knowledge standard contained therein.



/s/ Steven WeldonSteven WeldonChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF GEO SPECIALTY CHEMICALS, INC. AS OF JUNE 30, 2000
AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHs ENDED JUNE 30,
2000. EXCEPT FOR THE DATES AND EPS NUMBERS, ALL OTHER AMOUNTS ARE IN THOUSANDS
OF DOLLARS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,821
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,358
<ALLOWANCES>                                       273
<INVENTORY>                                     19,820
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,211
<PP&E>                                         118,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,014
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 195,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,718
<BONDS>                                        120,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   195,861
<SALES>                                         46,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,578
<CGS>                                           34,951
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,863
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   167
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,813
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,735
<INCOME-TAX>                                       547
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,188
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,188
<EPS-BASIC>                                   8,735.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 8,735.29


</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4661 

To authorize the President to posthumously award the Medal of Honor 

to Alwyn C. Cashe for acts of valor during Operation Iraqi Freedom. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2020 

Mr. COTTON (for himself, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. KAINE, Mr. 

MANCHIN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Mr. CRUZ) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the President to posthumously award the Medal 

of Honor to Alwyn C. Cashe for acts of valor during 

Operation Iraqi Freedom. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD MEDAL OF HONOR 

4 TO SERGEANT FIRST CLASS ALWYN C. CASHE 

5 FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING OPERATION 

6 IRAQI FREEDOM. 

7 (a) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwith8 standing the time limitations specified in section 7274 of 

9 title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4661 IS

1 with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons 

2 who served in the Armed Forces, the President may award 

3 the Medal of Honor under section 7271 of such title to 

4 Sergeant First Class Alwyn C. Cashe for the acts of valor 

5 described in subsection (b). 

6 (b) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor 

7 referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of Sergeant 

8 First Class Alwyn C. Cashe on October 17, 2005, as a 

9 member of the Army serving in Iraq in support of Oper10 ation Iraqi Freedom, for which he was posthumously 

11 awarded the Silver Star. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4684 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

440 Arapahoe Street in Thermopolis, Wyoming, as the ‘‘Robert L. Brown 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2020 

Mr. ENZI (for himself and Mr. BARRASSO) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 440 Arapahoe Street in Thermopolis, Wyoming, as the ‘‘Robert L. Brown Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ROBERT L. BROWN POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 440 Arapahoe Street in 

6 Thermopolis, Wyoming, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Robert L. Brown Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4684 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert L. Brown Post 

3 Office’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of Gateway Distributors, Ltd., a
Nevada  corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB/A No. 2 for the period ended
December  31,  2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Bailey, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 1, 2006.
                                      /s/ Richard A. Bailey
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Richard A. Bailey, Chief Financial Officer
#### Robert Payne *et al.,*Resp’ts, *v.*The City of Brooklyn, App’lt.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,*

*Filed May 13, 1889.)*

1. Municipal corporations—City op Brooklyn—Public improvements —How paid for.

By the charter of the city of Brooklyn, the fees of the commissioners of estimates and assessments, in the matter of improving a street, are made part of the expense, and, as such, are chargeable upon the lands benefitted. The city has the sole power to collect the money, and this is sufficient to support a promise to pay, even if the money had not been actually collected when the promise was made. It is a city assent which can be unanticipated by the city, if an affirmative agreement for that purpose is made.

2. Action—When common action maintained.

As the plaintiffs have a common interest in the money, they can unite in a common action to recover it.

Appeal from a judgment of the special term.

*John A. Taylor,*for app’lt; *William E. 3. Eales,*for resp’ts.

Barnard, P. J.

The complaint states that at the instance and upon the application of the defendant, the plaintiffs were appointed by the supreme court as commissioners of estimate and assessment in the matter of improving Fourth avenue, one of the streets of the city. It is further stated therein that they accepted the office and performed the duties and made a report therein, which the defendant received from the commissioners upon the express promise that the city would pay the commissioners’ fees, when the report was confirmed ; that the city procured such confirmation and refused to pay the fees. To this pleading there is a general demur. The improvement of Fourth avenue under the defendant’s charter was required to be made in this way:

The commissioner’s fees are made a part of the expense and, as such, chargeable upon the lands benefitted by the improvement. The usual method is to pay out of the moneys collected as the result of the assessment, on the basis of the report. When the report was confirmed, the city had the power to raise the fund, and promised to pay the commissioners from this source. We think the city could legally do this. The service had been rendered substantially at the request, and certainly for the benefit of the defendant.

The sole power to collect the money was given to it, and this is sufficient to support the promise to pay, even if the money had not been actually collected when promise was made.

It was a city assent which could be anticipated by the *428city, if an affirmative agreement was made for that purpose. The plaintiffs have a joint right of action. When parties have a common interest in the money, they can unite in a common action to recover it. *Marshall*v. *Moseley,*21 N. Y., 280.

The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Dykman, J., concurs; Pratt, J., not sitting.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary license has been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984, as amended by OSRA 1998 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR 515. License No.
Name/address
Date reissued3706
Chesapeake Bay Shipping and Warehousing, Inc., 3431 Benson Avenue, Suite E, Baltimore, MD 21227
May 1, 1999.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Consumer Complaints and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 00-11715 Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### § 102.90 Notice of hearing; hearing; proceedings before the Board; briefs; determination of dispute.

If it appears to the Regional Director that the charge has merit and the parties to the dispute have not submitted satisfactory evidence to the Regional Director that they have adjusted, or have agreed-upon methods for the voluntary adjustment of, the dispute out of which such unfair labor practice has arisen, the Regional Director will serve on all parties to such dispute a Notice of Hearing under Section 10(k) of the Act before a Hearing Officer at a time and place stated in the Notice. The hearing date will not be less than 10 days after service of the notice of the filing of the charge. The Notice of Hearing must contain a simple statement of the issues involved in such dispute. Such Notice will be issued promptly, and, in cases in which it is deemed appropriate to seek injunctive relief pursuant to Section 10(l) of the Act, will normally be issued within 5 days of the date upon which injunctive relief is first sought. Hearings will be conducted by a Hearing Officer, and the procedure will conform, insofar as applicable, to the procedure set forth in §§ 102.64 through 102.68. Upon the close of the hearing, the proceeding will be transferred to the Board, and the Board will proceed either promptly upon the record, or after oral argument, or the submission of briefs, or further hearing, to determine the dispute or otherwise dispose of the matter. Parties who desire to file a brief with the Board must do so within 7 days after the close of the hearing. However, no briefs will be filed in cases designated in the Notice of Hearing as involving the national defense, and the parties, after the close of the evidence, may argue orally upon the record their respective contentions and positions; except that, upon application for leave to file briefs expeditiously made to the Board in Washington, DC, after the close of the hearing, the Board may for good cause shown, grant leave to file briefs and set a time for filing. Simultaneously upon such filing, a copy must be served on the other parties. No reply brief may be filed except upon special leave of the Board.
Kyle	Johnson	

Johnson	Aerial	Photography

497	S	Lawson	Dr,	Green	Lake,	WI	54941

Dear Madam or Sir, I am sending you this letter in pursuit to Section 333 of the FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the “Reform Act”) and 14 C.F.R. Part 11. 

Specifically exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 

61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) 

and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b). 

I am seeking to do aerial photography and videography to enhance the property

interest to valuable homes in central Wisconsin. As well as work with conservancies to 

keep watch of algae growth rate and weed formation in Wisconsin’s Lakes. I need relief 

from this to be able to run my business of aerial photography for real estate agents. The 

restrictions are hindering my ability to service this industry safely and through the right 

path of legality I hope to do so. Granting me exemption like you have done for exemption 

No. 11153, and No. 11218 will allow for safe and regulated flight of my phantom 2 

vision +. This device, like you know, does not require airworthiness certification as you 

described in docket No. 11218.

Safety is the biggest fear that you may have and I plan to implement a pre-flight 

list as well as inflight safety concerns and the quick ability to end operation if a hazard 

arises or weather becomes an issue to the safety of the flight. Like in exemption No. 

11153, the ability to use an UA, replacing manned aircraft, the safety of the public and all 

those considered. UAS also provides an additional tool to the aerial photography industry

which supplement the current capabilities offered by manned aircraft. 

This may be a short exemption but I believe the ability that I would be granted 

does not only effect me in money, but the ability to work with conservancies to monitor 

algae growth, track deer population and be aware of any fire hazards that may be 

troublesome to our land. In coordination with University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, I have 

been chosen for a select group of people to help build the entrepreneurs of tomorrow. In 

this program I am given guidance, opportunity and funding to grow my business the best 

I can. Accepting me for this exemption will give the chance for a younger, smaller 

company to get a foothold, instead of a very large company taking over and 

monopolizing this industry as well. 

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Kyle Johnson

Johnson Aerial Photography
§ 1620.3 General coverage of employees “engaged in * * * the production of goods for commerce.” ( a ) Like the FLSA, the EPA applies to employees “engaged in * * * the production of goods for commerce.” The broad meaning of “commerce” as defined in section 3(b) of the FLSA has been outlind in § 1620.2. “Goods” is also comprehensively defined in section 3(i) of the FLSA and includes “articles or subjects of commerce of any character, or any part or ingredient thereof” not expressly excepted by the statute. The activities constituting “production” of the goods for commerce are defined in section 3(j) of the FLSA. These are not limited to such work as manufacturing but include handling or otherwise working on goods intended for shipment out of the State either directly or indirectly or for use within the State to serve the needs of the instrumentalities or facilities by which interstate or foreign commerce is carried on. Employees engaged in any closely related process or occupation directly essential to such production of any goods, whether employed by the producer or by an independent employer, are also engaged, by definition, in “production.” Thus, employees engaged in the administration, planning, management, and control of the various physical processes together with the accompanying clerical and accounting activities are, from a productive standpoint and for purposes of the FLSA, “engaged in the production of goods for commerce.”
( b ) Employees engaged in the production of goods for interstate or foreign commerce include those who work in manufacturing, processing, and distributing establishments, including wholesale and retail establishments that “produce” (including handling or working on) goods for such commerce. This includes everyone employed in such establishments, or elsewhere in the enterprises by which they are operated, whose activities constitute “production” of such goods under the principles outlined in paragraph (a) of this section. Thus, employees who sell, process, load, pack, or otherwise handle or work on goods which are to be shipped or delivered outside the State either by their employer or by another firm, and either in the same form or as a part or ingredient of other goods, are engaged in the production of goods for commerce within the coverage of the FLSA. So also are the office, management, sales, and shipping personnel, and maintenance, custodial, and protective employees who perform as a part of the integrated effort for the production of the goods for commerce, services related to such production or to such goods or to the plant, equipment, or personnel by which the production is accomplished.
§ 102.144 Standards for awards. ( a ) An eligible applicant may receive an award for fees and expenses incurred in connection with an adversary adjudication or in connection with a significant and discrete substantive portion of that proceeding, unless the position of the General Counsel over which the applicant has prevailed was substantially justified. The burden of proof that an award should not be made to an eligible applicant is on the General Counsel, who may avoid an award by showing that the General Counsel's position in the proceeding was substantially justified.
( b ) An award will be reduced or denied if the applicant has unduly or unreasonably protracted the adversary adjudication or if special circumstances make the award sought unjust.
[46 FR 48087, Sept. 30, 1981, as amended at 51 FR 17733, May 15, 1986]