alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1030 CA 11-00662 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, SCONIERS, GREEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

ERICA L. NIEMANN AND DANIEL ELLIS, AS CO-ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF TIMOTHY W. NIEMANN, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

V ORDER

ST. JOSEPH’S HOSPITAL HEALTH CENTER, RONALD CAPUTO, M.D., SJH CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

GROSS, SHUMAN, BRIZDLE & GILFILLAN, P.C., BUFFALO (DAVID H. ELIBOL OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (MAUREEN E. MANEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT ST. JOSEPH’S HOSPITAL HEALTH CENTER.
MARTIN, GANOTIS, BROWN, MOULD & CURRIE, P.C., DEWITT (BRIAN M. GARGANO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS RONALD CAPUTO, M.D. AND SJH CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered January 11, 2011 in a wrongful death action. The order denied the motion of plaintiffs to vacate a stipulation of discontinuance.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: September 30, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
Docket No: FAA-2015-3147 Dir ID: 2014-NM-094-AD
# ACTION:

 Notice; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                         In the                         **Federal Register**                         issue of Monday, January 3, 2000, make the following correction:                     

                        Correction: In the                         **Federal Register**                         issue of Monday, January 3, 2000, Volume 65, Number 1; DOCID:fr03ja00-47, on page 136, the last sentence of the first paragraph under “Use”, the phrase in parenthesis “(they are attached as Exhibits 1-3 hereto)” needs to be deleted. Also on page 136, in the second sentence of the second paragraph under “Use”, the word “attached” needs to be deleted, and in the first sentence of the paragraph under “Home Health Advance Beneficiary Notices”, the words “Exhibits 1-3” need to be deleted. The HHABNs are not attached to the                         **Federal Register**                         notice but can be obtained by accessing HCFA's web site address at (note correction to address) http://www.hcfa.gov/​regs/​prdact95.htm, or E-mail your request, including your address, phone number, OMB number, and HCFA document identifier, to Paperwork @hcfa.gov, or call the Reports Clearance Office on (410) 786-1326.                     

Dated: January 7, 2000.

John Parmigiani,

Manager, HCFA Office of Information Services, Security and Standards Group, Division of HCFA Enterprise Standards.

[FR Doc. 00-1198 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4120-03-P
<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Donald L. Paliwoda, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2004 of Davel Communications, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2004

                                                    /s/  DONALD L. PALIWODA
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                    Donald L. Paliwoda
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

                                       24
**Exhibit 32.1**

**IDEAEDGE, INC.**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of IdeaEdge, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Collas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
#### § 297.2 Applicability.

This part applies to interstate air transportation of property and to foreign air transportation of property outbound from the United States by foreign indirect air carriers. It also applies to applications for registration as a foreign indirect air carrier of property.

[ER-1294, 47 FR 19684, May 7, 1982, as amended at 60 FR 43527, Aug. 22, 1995]
128 STAT. 1170 PUBLIC LAW 113–109—JUNE 9, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 724: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113–320 (Comm. on Energy and Commerce). 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 113–144 (Comm. on Environment and Public Works). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Jan. 8, considered and passed House. 

May 22, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–109 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the Clean Air Act to remove the requirement for dealer certification 

of new light-duty motor vehicles. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR DEALER CERTIFICATION 

OF NEW LIGHT-DUTY MOTOR VEHICLES. 

Section 207(h) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7541(h)) is 

amended— 

(1) by striking paragraph (1); and 

(2) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs 

(1) and (2), respectively. 

Approved June 9, 2014. 

June 9, 2014 

[H.R. 724] 


srobinson on DSKB307YQ1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
#### PARK & ROBINSON HARDWARE CO. v. COPELAND.

(Decided November 28, 1916.)

Appeal from Tuscaloosa Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Bernard Harwood.

No counsel marked for appellant.

Verner & Rice, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Dismissed for want of prosecution.
#### STEWART v STATE

Ohio Appeals, 4th Dist, Ross Co

Decided May 11, 1929

F N R Redfern, Adelphi, for Stewart.

Howard Goldsberry, Pros. Atty., Chillicothe, for State.

Before Judges HOUCK & LEMERT (5th Dist) and MAUCK (4th, Dist)

BY THE COURT

The only question in the case is whether under the law and the facts the state proved that averment of the indictment which charged that the check was issued “with intent to defraud”. The record shows that the check was handed to Weaver in satisfaction of a debt then owing him by Stewart. The courts of different states have taken different positions upon the questions as to whether an intent to defraud could be shown when the party issuing it was acquiring no new right or no new property but was only undertaking to satisfy an old obligation. It is not necessary to discuss the divergent views of different courts upon this question in view of the position taken by our Supreme Court in State v. Lowenstein, 109 OS. 383. In that case our court holds that the mere fact that the check was given for a past consideration does not show that the intent to defraud was absent. The court says:

> “In the issuing of a check for a past as well as a present consideration the question whether or not the intent to defraud exists is a question of fact, and hence for the jury.”

Under the Lowenstein case therefore the accused was not entitled to a discharge as a matter of law. His intentions in the premises had to go to the jury.

This leaves no question of law for determination and the judgment must stand unless this court unanimously find the verdict to be against the weight of the evidence. Two of the judges (Mauck, J. and Lemert, J.) are of the view that the verdict and judgment are contrary to the weight of the evidence. One of the court (Houck, J.) does not concur in this view. It follows that the judgment is affirmed.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Chrome Ridge quadrangle, Oregon:7.5-minute series (topographic)**
 
2012 | 2014 | 2015
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28/6:42123-D 6/
Item Number:0080-G-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000933102
 
February 7, 2018
§ 49.55 Recording of releases, cancellations, discharges, and satisfactions: special requirements. ( a ) A release, cancellation, discharge, or satisfaction of an encumbrance on all of the collateral listed in an instrument recorded under this subpart, or on all of the collateral at a particular location, must be in a form equivalent to AC Form 8050-41, signed by the holder of all of the collateral at the particular location, and contain a description of the encumbrance, the recording information furnished to the holder at the time of recording, and the location of the released collateral.
( b ) If the encumbrance on collateral at all of the locations listed in an instrument recorded under this subpart is released, canceled, discharged, or satisfied, the locations need not be listed. However, the document must state that all of the collateral at all of the locations listed in the encumbrance has been so released, canceled, discharged, or satisfied. The original recorded document must be clearly identified by the names of the parties, the date of recording by the FAA, and the document number.
[Doc. No. 1996, 29 FR 6486, May 19, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 49-1, 31 FR 4499, Mar. 17, 1966; Amdt. 49-7, 37 FR 25487, Dec. 1, 1972]
# EUR-Lex - 31995R2638 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995R2638

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2638/95 of 13 November 1995 derogating from Regulation (EEC) No 3389/73 laying down the procedure and conditions for the sale of tobacco held by intervention agencies **

*
Official Journal L 271 , 14/11/1995 P. 0011 - 0011 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2638/95 of 13 November 1995 derogating from Regulation (EEC) No 3389/73 laying down the procedure and conditions for the sale of tobacco held by intervention agencies

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 727/70 of 21 April 1970 on the common organization of the market in raw tobacco (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 860/92 (2), and in particular Articles 7 (4) and 15 thereof,

Whereas, for administrative reasons, the time limit laid down in Article 6 (1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3389/73 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 3477/93 (4), for fixing the minimum price for each lot or for deciding not to make an award after submission of tenders under the invitation to tender opened by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1618/95 (5) should be extended; whereas tenderers should be permitted to withdraw their tenders;

Whereas, in view of its objective, the provisions of this Regulation should enter into force immediately; whereas they should apply from the end of the period provided for in Article 6 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 3389/73;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Raw Tobacco,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Notwithstanding Article 6 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 3389/73, the time allowed for fixing a minimum price for each lot or for deciding not to make an award under the invitation to tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 1618/95 shall be 60 days.

Article 2

Notwithstanding Article 4 (4) of Regulation (EEC) No 3389/73, tenderers may withdraw their offers within five working days of publication of this Regulation.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 24 October 1995.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 November 1995.

For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission
#### § 303.01 Purpose.

This part sets forth the procedures by which applications may be made to the Department of Transportation under 49 U.S.C. 41308 and 41309 and procedures governing proceedings to enforce these provisions. These procedures supplement the rules described in part 302 of this chapter, which also apply to the review of air carrier agreements.

[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15936, Apr. 16, 2019]
#### § 48.5 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,597
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,683
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,732
<INVENTORY>                                     23,147
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         445,369
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,957
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,075,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        678,035
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           556
<OTHER-SE>                                     281,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,075,812
<SALES>                                         85,730
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               236,398
<CGS>                                           61,455
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  142,002
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,411
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,262
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,608
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,654
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,654
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-62600, 333-56906, 333-59959 and 333-73015) pertaining to the
Actuate Corporation 1998 Equity Incentive Plan, Actuate Corporation 1998
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Actuate Corporation 1998 Non-Employee Directors
Option Plan, Actuate Corporation 2001 Supplemental Stock Option Plan, First
Amended and Restated Tidestone Technologies, Inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option
Plan of 1999 and Tidestone Technologies, Inc. 1998 Incentive Stock Option Plan
and we also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-67220 and 333-34410) of Actuate Corporation and
in the related prospectuses of our report dated January 18, 2002, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Actuate Corporation included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 15, 2002
Exhibit 32.1

Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Daniel Dror, CEO, President and
Chairman of American International Industries, Inc, a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the
following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
with respect to the following annual report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
30, 2006.

The undersigned certifies that the above report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and information contained in the above report fairly presents, in all respects, the
financial condition of American International Industries, Inc. and results of its
operations.

Date: August 8, 2006
Daniel Dror
CEO, President and Chairman/s/ Daniel Dror
<PAGE>

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  L.  Evan  Baergen,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of Green Fusion Corporation for the quarterly period ended
October  31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Green Fusion Corporation


                                        By:     /s/ L. Evan Baergen
                                                --------------------------------

                                        Name:   L. EVAN BAERGEN

                                        Title:  Chief Financial Officer

                                        Date:   December 16, 2002
§ 18.88 Transcript of proceedings. ( a ) *Hearing transcript.* All hearings must be recorded and transcribed. The parties and the public may obtain copies of the transcript from the official reporter at rates not to exceed the applicable rates fixed by the contract with the reporter.
( b ) *Corrections to the transcript.* A party may file a motion to correct the official transcript. Motions for correction must be filed within 14 days of the receipt of the transcript unless the judge permits additional time. The judge may grant the motion in whole or part if the corrections involve substantive errors. At any time before issuing a decision and upon notice to the parties, the judge may correct errors in the transcript.
SERVED MARCH 7, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

JOSEPH D. BARBERA 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

. (Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013-1083 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013NM090056) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List . 

Attachment - Service List 

~ '\ -=-··-·· .. ·. 

.. ·~····--·-·--··· 

Chief 

'--ft6~ Administrative Law Judge/'" ~ 

/ v/ 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Joseph D. Barbera, Respondent 

14706 N.E. Erickson Dr. 

La Center, W A 98629-4405 

TEL:, NOT PROVIDED 

FAX: NOT PROVIDED 

David F. Shayne, Complainant's Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Ave., S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1847 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-1083 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal · 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Airborne geophysical surveys inSeward Peninsula area, Alaska.**
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.76:69-294
Item Number:0624-H (online)
CGP systemNumber:000932512
 
 
 
plate-01.pdf
 
plate-02.pdf
 
plate-03.pdf
 
plate-04.pdf
 
plate-05.pdf
 
plate-06.pdf
 
plate-07.pdf
 
plate-08.pdf
 
plate-09.pdf
 
plate-10.pdf
 
plate-11.pdf
 
plate-12.pdf
 
plate-13.pdf
 
plate-14.pdf
 
plate-15.pdf
 
plate-16.pdf
 
plate-17.pdf
 
plate-18.pdf
 
 
January 26, 2018