alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BISHOP v JONES et

Ohio Appeals, 5th Dist, Licking Co

LEMERT, J.

It will be noted from a careful examination of Item 3, hereinbefore quoted, that there are no words of survivorship, and no residuarv clause in said Item 3, or any other part of the will, which would include any interest of Samantha Bishop, and the devise was not to a class, but of separate shares to individuals.

It must be remembered that a will should be construed with reference to the words of the whole will, taken in connection with the circumstances at the time of the making of the will, and not with conditions at the time of the testator’s death.

Therefore, notwithstanding a testator, if his will had been made subsequent to the death of his brothers, would probably have given the property to his sisters, rather than his heirs at law, the fact that he gave the property to his brothers, who were then living, and his sister, without any other disposition of it, shows that to have been his intention, clearly and unmistakably expressed; and it can make no difference with the construction of the will that the heirs at lav? obtained a share thereunder.

We find that none of the conditions mentioned in 10581 GC necessary to prevent the lapse of this devise, were fulfilled, and, therefore, said devise to Sa*485mantha Bishop fails, and Lucretia Bragg Smith is intestate as to the one-fourth undivided part of lot 115 in the Village of Granville, Ohio.

As this property came to the testatrix by devise from her husband, George Bragg, said intestate portion would be governed by 8577 GC and there being no issue of the parties, said property would pass one-half to the brothers and sisters of the intestate, and one-half to the brothers and sisters of such deceased husband from whom said real estate came, or their personal representatives.

The same judgment will be entered in this Court as was entered in the Court below.

Exceptions may be noted.

Houck, J, and Sherick, J, concur.
**Exhibit 32**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company (the “Companies”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge,

 

1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

 

 
| March 30, 2005                      |
|-------------------------------------|
|                                |
|                                |
|                                |  /s/ Victor A. Staffieri |   |
| Chairman of the Board, President    |
| and Chief Executive Officer         |
| Louisville Gas and Electric Company |
| Kentucky Utilities Company          |
|                                |
|                                |
|                                |  /s/ S. Bradford Rives |   |
| Chief Financial Officer             |
| Louisville Gas and Electric Company |
| Kentucky Utilities Company          |
|                                     |  |  |  |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



I, Mark F. Travis, the Chief Executive Officer of Intrepid Capital Corporation
(the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

         1.       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A Amendment No. 1 of the
                  Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the
                  "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 27, 2003

                                 By:          /s/ Mark F. Travis
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Mark F. Travis, Chief Executive Officer



                                       24
§ 1471.995 Principal. *Principal* means— ( a ) An officer, director, owner, partner, principal investigator, or other person within a participant with management or supervisory responsibilities related to a covered transaction; or
( b ) A consultant or other person, whether or not employed by the participant or paid with Federal funds, who— ( 1 ) Is in a position to handle Federal funds;
( 2 ) Is in a position to influence or control the use of those funds; or,
( 3 ) Occupies a technical or professional position capable of substantially influencing the development or outcome of an activity required to perform the covered transaction.
#### § 1405.7 Goals and timetables.

On an annual basis, as part of the manpower and budget process, management will set goals for establishing part-time positions to part-time along with a timetable setting forth interim and final deadlines for achieving the goals. Decisions on part-time employment will be based on such factors as agency mission, occupational mix, workload fluctuations, affirmative actions, geographic dispersion, effect on providing services to the public, and employee interest in part-time employment.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Joel A. Ronning, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of DigitalRiver, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)  designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

 

(b)  evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)  disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)  all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)  any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:   March  12, 2004 |   | /s/ Joel A. Ronning      |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|                                        |   | Joel A. Ronning          |
|                                        |   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
#### CITY OF COLUMBIA, Respondent, v. JOHN SAMUELS, Appellant.

Kansas City Court of Appeals,

May 27, 1912.

CRIMINAL LAW: City Prosecution: Arraignment: Civil Action. In a prosecution for violating a city ordinance, in tbe sale of liquor, a conviction will not be invalidated because tbe defendant was not arraigned and a plea of not guilty entered. In that respect tbe prosecution bears resemblance to a civil action.

Appeal from Boone Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *D. H. Harris,*Judge.

Affirmed.

*W. H. Rothwell*and *J. L. Stephens*for appellant.

*W. M. Dinwiddie*for respondent.

ELLISON, J.

Defendant was convicted in the police court of Columbia for the violation of a city ordinance, in the sale of intoxicating liquor. He appealed to the circuit court and was again convicted.

It is objected that the record fails to show an arraignment of defendant and his plea to the charge. In this respect, cases "of this nature are likened to procedure in civil cases and an arraignment is not necessary. [St. Louis v. Knox, 74 Mo. 79.]

Defendant likewise insists that his motion in arrest of judgment should have been sustained on ac*93count of insufficiency of the information filed in the police court. In our opinion it is sufficient to sustain the finding and judgment.

It is next insisted that if the trial court had given defendant the benefit of the reasonable doubt which it is claimed the evidence shows, it would have resulted in his acquittal. But after consideration of the arguments made by counsel, and the record in the cause, we are satisfied we have no right to interfere on the score of insufficiency of evidence.

An examination of the record leads to an affirmance of the judgment.

All concur.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

Molter Corporation 

Under Contract No. N40083-09-D-0032 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60442 

Steven J. Koprince, Esq. 

Matthew P. Moriarty, Esq. 

Matthew T. Schoonover, Esq. 

Koprince Law LLC 

Lawrence, KS 

Ronald J. Borro, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

Nicole R. Best, Esq. 

D'Ontae D. Sylvertooth, Esq. 

Trial Attorneys 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 8 February 2018 

KEifrH D. WOODROW 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60442, Appeal of Molter 

Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
#### § 1201.4 Employee.

The term *employee* as used in this part includes every person in the service of a carrier (subject to its continuing authority to supervise and direct the manner of rendition of his service) who performs any work defined as that of an employee or subordinate official in the orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission now in effect, and as the same may be amended or interpreted by orders hereafter entered by the Commission pursuant to the authority which is hereby conferred upon it to enter orders amending or interpreting such existing orders: *Provided, however,* That no occupational classification made by order of the Interstate Commerce Commission shall be construed to define the crafts according to which railway employees may be organized by their voluntary action, nor shall the jurisdiction or powers of such employee organizations be regarded as in any way limited or defined by the provisions of this Act or by the orders of the Commission.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED**

**PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the use in this Annual Report [Form 40-F] of **CGI Group Inc.** [the “Company”] of our report datedNovember 10, 2015 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 included herein and our report dated November 10, 2015 with respect to the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2015. 

We also consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statements [Form S-8 Nos. 333-197742, 333-112021, 333-13350, 333-66044, 333-74932, 333-146175 and 333-177013] pertaining to the Company’s stock option plans of our reports dated November 10, 2015 with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 included herein and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2015. 

/s/ Ernst & Young1

Ernst & Young 

Montréal,Canada 

December 21, 2015 

 

 

1 CPA auditor, CA, public accountancy permit No. A122227
Exhibit 32.1 IDEAEDGE, INC. CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350
(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) In connection with the Annual Report of IdeaEdge, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James Collas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  December 23, 2009/s/ James CollasJames CollasChief Executive Officer
Money4Gold Holdings, Inc


EXHIBIT 10.3

Money4Gold Holdings, Inc.

595 S. Federal Highway, Suite 600

Boca Raton, Florida 33432




September 30, 2009

Mr. Umut Vardar

Leadcreations.com, LLC

201 Alhambra Circle

Suite 501

Coral Gables, FL 33134




Re:

Accounts Payable Credit




Dear Umut:




This letter evidences our recent agreement through which Leadcreations.com, LLC (“Leadcreations”) has agreed to reduce the accounts payable from Money4Gold Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) by $50,000 in exchange for the Company issuing to Leadcreations 333,334 shares of common stock and 333,334 warrants exercisable at $0.30 per share as provided in the confidential private placement memorandum dated August 20, 2009.




Please complete the subscription agreement and submit it to me at your earliest convenience.  Please also execute a copy of this letter agreement evidencing your agreement to its terms.




		
	 
	Sincerely yours,


	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	/s/ Daniel Brauser


	 
	Daniel Brauser


	 
	Chief Financial Officer







We hereby agree to the following:




LEADCREATIONS.COM, LLC










		
	By:

	/s/ Umut Vardar                     


	 
	Umut Vardar, Manager
§ 1601.3 Other definitions. ( a ) For the purposes of this part, the term *title VII* shall mean title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; the term *ADA* shall mean the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; the term *GINA* shall mean the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008; the term *PWFA* shall mean the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act; the terms *EEOC* or *Commission* shall mean the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or any of its designated representatives; the term *Washington Field Office* shall mean the Commission's primary non-Headquarters office serving the District of Columbia and Virginia suburban counties and jurisdictions; the term *FEP agency* shall mean a State or local agency which the Commission has determined satisfies the criteria stated in section 706(c) of title VII; and the term *verified* shall mean sworn to or affirmed before a notary public, designated representative of the Commission, or other person duly authorized by law to administer oaths and take acknowledgements, or supported by an unsworn declaration in writing under penalty of perjury.
( b ) For the purposes of this part, the terms *file, serve, submit, receive, transmit, present, send, issue,* and *notify* shall include all forms of digital transmission.
( c ) The delegations of authority in subpart B of this part are applicable to charges filed pursuant to either section 706 or section 707 of title VII.
[42 FR 55388, Oct. 14, 1977, as amended at 56 FR 9624, Mar. 7, 1991; 71 FR 26827, May 9, 2006; 74 FR 63982, Dec. 7, 2009; 85 FR 65217, Oct. 15, 2020; 89 FR 11169, Feb. 14, 2024]
# EUR-Lex - 31997D0419(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31997D0419(01)

**Decision of the Court of Justice amending Annex II to the Rules of Procedure (extensions of time limits on account of distance) **

*
Official Journal L 103 , 19/04/1997 P. 0003 - 0003 *

DECISION OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE amending Annex II to the Rules of Procedure (extensions of time limits on account of distance)

THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES.

Having regard to Article 81 (2) of the Rules of Procedure,

Whereas, by reason of the accession to the European Communities of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden, it is necessary to provide for the extension of time limits on account of distance as regards parties habitually resident in the new Member States;

Whereas Annex II to the Rules of Procedure, as adopted on 19 June 1991, must therefore be amended,

DECIDES:

Article 1

The third indent of Article 1 of Annex II to the Rules of Procedure shall be replaced by the following:

'- for the European territory of the Kingdom of Denmark, for the Kingdom of Spain, for Ireland, for the Hellenic Republic, for the Italian Republic, for the Republic of Austria, for the Portuguese Republic (with the exception of the Azores and Madeira), for the Republic of Finland, for the Kingdom of Sweden and for the United Kingdom: 10 days.`

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Done at Luxembourg on 11 March 1997.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23 - 0291

_________________ WILFRED L. DOLL and CHERI L. DOLL,

Plaintiffs, Counter Defendants, Appellees and Cross Appellants, v. LITTLE BIG WARM RANCH, LLC, LARRY H. SM ITH and MARK FRENCH,

Defendants, Counter Plaintiffs and Appellants.

________________________________________ LEVI DOLL and SHEILA DOLL,

Intervenors. O R D E R

_________________ The record was filed for purposes of this appeal on July 3 , 2023 . T he opening brief is now overdue. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Appellant s shall prepare, file , and serve the opening brief on appeal no later than September 29 , 2023 . Failure to file the brief within that time will result in dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 31 2023

08/31/2023
Case Number: DA 23-0291
#### §§ 325.7-325.9 [Reserved]
§ 1450.12 Collection in installments. ( a ) Whenever feasible, and except as otherwise provided by law, debts owed to the United States, together with interest, penalties, and administrative costs as required by this regulation should be collected in full in one lump sum. This is true whether the debt is being collected by administrative offset or by another method, including voluntary payment. However, if the debtor is financially unable to pay the indebtedness in one lump sum, payment may be accepted in regular installments. FMCS will obtain financial statements from debtors who represent that they are unable to pay the debt in one lump sum. If FMCS agrees to accept payment in regular installments it will obtain a legally enforceable written agreement from the debtor which specifies all of the terms of the arrangement and which contains a provision accelerating the debt in the event the debtor defaults. The size and frequency of installment payments should bear a reasonable relation to the size of the debt and the debtor's ability to pay. If possible, the installment payments should be sufficient in size and frequency to liquidate the Government's claim in not more than 3 years. Installment payments of less than $50 per month will be accepted only if justifiable on the grounds of financial hardship or some other reasonable cause.
( b ) If the debtor owes more than one debt and designates how a voluntary installment payment is to be applied as among those debts, that designation must be followed. If the debtor does not designate the application of the payment, FMCS will apply payments to various debts in accordance with the best interests of the United States, as determined by the facts and circumstances of the particular case, paying special attention to applicable statutes of limitations.
#### § 102.92 Review of determination.

The record of the proceeding under Section 10(k) and the determination of the Board will become a part of the record in such unfair labor practice proceeding and may be subject to judicial review in proceedings to enforce or review the final order of the Board under Section 10(e) and (f) of the Act.