alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[113th Congress Public Law 129]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 1723]]

Public Law 113-129
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To amend certain definitions contained in the Provo River Project 
 Transfer Act for purposes of clarifying certain property descriptions, 
     and for other purposes. <<NOTE: July 25, 2014 -  [H.R. 255]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: Utah.>>  CLARIFYING CERTAIN PROPERTY 
                              DESCRIPTIONS IN PROVO RIVER PROJECT 
                              TRANSFER ACT.

    (a) Pleasant Grove Property.--Section 2(4)(A) of the Provo River 
Project Transfer Act (Public Law 108-382; 118 Stat. 2212) is amended by 
striking ``of enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``on which the 
parcel is conveyed under section 3(a)(2)''.
    (b) Provo Reservoir Canal.--Section 2(5) of the Provo River Project 
Transfer Act (Public Law 108-382; 118 Stat. 2212) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``canal, and any associated land, rights-of-
        way, and facilities'' and inserting ``water conveyance facility 
        historically known as the Provo Reservoir Canal and all 
        associated bridges, fixtures, structures, facilities, lands, 
        interests in land, and rights-of-way held,'';
            (2) by inserting ``and forebay'' after ``Diversion Dam'';
            (3) by inserting ``near the Jordan Narrows to the point 
        where water is discharged to the Welby-Jacob Canal and the Utah 
        Lake Distributing Canal'' after ``Penstock''; and
            (4) by striking ``of enactment of this Act'' and inserting 
        ``on which the Provo Reservoir Canal is conveyed under section 
        3(a)(1)''.

    Approved July 25, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 255:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113-200 (Comm. on Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 159 (2013):
                                    Dec. 3, considered and passed House.
                                                        Vol. 160 (2014):
                                    July 9, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 18.105 Limited admissibility.

When evidence which is admissible as to one party or for one purpose but not admissible as to another party or for another purpose is admitted, the judge, upon request, shall restrict the evidence to its proper scope.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act Amendments of 1975

              														Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act Amendments of 1975, January 2, 1976.						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1128,			accessed on September 12, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
**Exhibit 21.1**

 
| Subsidiaries of the  Registrant: |
|----------------------------------|
|                             |   |   |
|                             |   | Video Wagering Systems  Corporation |
|                             |   | RoulabetteTM Nevada  Corporation |
|                             |   | Kenilworth Systems  Nevada Corporation |
|                             |   | Kenilworth U.K. Ltd. |
|                             |   | Kenilworth Satellite  Broadcasting Corporation, a Delaware Corporation |
|                             |   | Satellite Gaming  Consultants, Inc., a Delaware Corporation |

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intelligent Living Corp. (formerly Elgrande.com, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael F. Holloran, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



DATED:

January 20, 2008

/s/ Michael F. Holloran

-----------------------------

Michael F. Holloran;

Chief Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Sorell, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Seung Nam Yang, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:   November 30, 2006        /s/Seung Nam Yang
                                             ---------------------------
                                             Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A,
Amendment No. 3 of Gateway Distributors, Ltd. for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2004, I, Richard A. Bailey, Chief Executive Officer of Gateway
Distributors, Ltd., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.     Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A, Amendment No. 3 for the fiscal
year ending December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.     The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A,
Amendment No. 3 for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004, fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Gateway Distributors, Ltd.

     Dated: November 8, 2006.

                                        /s/ Richard A. Bailey
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                          Richard A. Bailey, Chief Executive
                                          Officer of Gateway Distributors, Ltd.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# DATE AND TIME:

Tuesday, May 16, 2000 at 10:0 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW, Washington, DC

      ( print page 30120)    

# STATUS:

 This meeting will be closed to the Public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. § 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. § 437g, § 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# DATE AND TIME:

Thursday, May 18, 2000 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW, Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# STATUS:

This Meeting will be open to the Public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2000-06—Gerald M. Moan on behalf of the 2000 Convention Committee of the Reform Party U.S.A.

Proposal to initiate a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Political Committee Definition (11 C.F.R. 100.5).

Administrative Matters.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-11881 Filed 5-8-00; 3:11 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
§ 18.410 Inadmissibility of pleas, plea discussion, and related statements. Except as otherwise provided in this rule, evidence of the following is not admissible against the defendant who made the plea or was a participant in the plea discussions: ( a ) A plea of guilty which was later withdrawn;
( b ) A plea of nolo contendere;
( c ) Any statement made in the course of any proceedings under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure or comparable state procedure regarding either of the foregoing pleas; or
( d ) Any statement made in the course of plea discussions with an attorney for the prosecuting authority which do not result in a plea of guilty or which result in a plea of guilty later withdrawn. However, such a statement is admissible in any proceeding wherein another statement made in the course of the same plea discussions has been introduced and the statement ought in fairness be considered contemporaneously with it.
§ 1401.21 Proactive disclosures and other disclosure requirements. ( a ) The FMCS will make available for public inspection in an electronic format on the Agency's website any record that has been requested 3 or more times. The Agency has a FOIA Public Liaison who can assist individuals in locating records particular to an agency. The FMCS FOIA Public Liaison's contact information is available on the FMCS FOIA web page (*www.fmcs.gov/foia*).
( b ) The FMCS will withhold information under FOIA only if the Agency “reasonably foresees” that disclosure would harm an interest protected by an exemption or as otherwise allowed by law.
( c ) Partial disclosures are appropriate for use by the FMCS when full disclosure is inappropriate or impossible. If a record contains both disclosable and exempt information, the exempt information will be redacted and the remaining record will be disclosed unless the two are so inextricably intertwined that it is not possible to separate them. Records disclosed in part shall be marked or annotated to show both the amount and the location of the information redacted and the applicable exemption.
( d ) All existing FMCS records are subject to disposition according to Agency record retention schedules and the General Records Schedules promulgated by the National Archives and Records Administration.
**Exhibit 32**

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Terry G. Roussel andSharon C. Kaiser, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of his or her knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Cornerstone RealtyFund, LLC on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations ofCornerstone Realty Fund, LLC.
|                    | /s/ TERRY G. ROUSSEL                                      |   |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: November 12, 2007 | Terry G. Roussel                                          |   |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive  Officer) of |   |
|                    | Cornerstone Ventures, Inc., Managing Member of            |   |
|                    | Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC, the Managing      |   |
|                    | Member of Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC                    |   |
|                    |                                                      |   |
|                    |                                                      |   |
|                    | /s/ SHARON C. KAISER                                      |   |
| Date: November 12, 2007 | Sharon C. Kaiser                                          |   |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial  Officer) of |   |
|                    | Cornerstone Ventures, Inc., Managing Member of            |   |
|                    | Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC, the Managing      |   |
|                    | Member of Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC                    |   |

 

 

----
#### Isaac Milton and Others, *Appellants,*v. William Milton, *Appellee.*

1. A demurrer should not be stricken because not *signed*by the party, when the defect lies only in the form of the affidavit thereto.

2. A certificate of service by a private party is not due and legal service of a notice.

3. A bill for partition should disclose the respective interests of the parties thereto.

This case was decided by Division A.

Appealed from the Circuit Court for Jackson County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*Paul Carter,*for Appellants;

*Galhoun*& *Campbell,*for Appellee.

Cockrell, J.

— This case presents many complications, due to the failure of the parties to follow the law strictly.

It is a suit for partition filed by William Milton against the other heirs at law of Mary Webster, deceased, four of whom were infants. It is alleged that one of the sons, Isaac Milton, was not entitled to any interest of the intestate ancestor, by reason of an advancement made to him in his life time.

There was a demurrer interposed to the bill of complaint, which was stricken by the court “upon the ground that the paper was not signed by the defendants, or either of them.” The rule does not require a signing of the de*565murrer by the defendants or either of them. There was a technical objection to the affidavit appended to the demurrer, in that it was made by the attorney and there was no statement therein that the defendants were absent from the State. Had the proper and specific objection been made, it might have been promptly met by timely application to supplement, or to file an affidavit *strictissimi juris.*There was also error in holding that “due and legal service” of the motion to strike was had. A certificate of a private party is not due and legal proof of service. .

The bill of complaint should be amended, as it does not disclose with any precision what may be the respective interest of the minor defendants — it appears only that they are grand-children of a former husband of Mary Webster. The bill further discloses that there was another son of Mary Webster who left a widow, but it does not appear except by inference whether he died before his mother, nor whether he left descendants.

The decree is reversed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Shackleford, J., concur;

Taylor, Hocker and Parki-iill, J. J., concur in the opinion.
##### 



Exhibit 32 (a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delphi
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, J. T. Battenberg III, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| |    |                                                                                                                                                             
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|
| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.

|              |  |  |  |                                                                                          
|------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|July 16, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ J. T. BATTENBERG III                                                                 
|              |  |  |  | J. T. Battenberg III
    Chairman of the Board,
    Chief Executive Officer and President
#### Robert Pollard, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Where the offense charged in a criminal prosecution is not in substance proven, the sentence may be reversed on writ of error.

This case was decided by Division A.

Writ of error to the Criminal Court of Record for Escambia County.

*45The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*John P. Stokes,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Park Trammell,*Attorney General, for the State.

Whitfield, C. J.

The information charges that Robert Pollard on July 31, 1910, in Escambia County, Florida, “being the agent and servant of W. S. Garfield & Company, a corporation, did then and there by virtue of his employment as such agent and servant, receive and take into his possession one hundred tons' of ice, of the value of six hundred dollars, of the property of said W. S. Garfield & Company, and did afterwards, to-wit, then and there embezzle and fraudulently convert the same to his own use, without the consent of said W. S. Garfield & Company.” A verdict of guilty as charged was rendered and a judgment entered thereon as for a felony to which a writ of error was taken by Pollard.

It appears that the accused was employed by the company to peddle ice for it; that the ice was gotten from a third party’s factory and a “slip” showing the quantity of ice delivered given each day to the defendant. In the afternoons the defendant would present to the company the “slip” showing the amount of ice received by him that day, and account for it in cash or in ice tickets sold by the company to its customers. It also appears that a large number of “forged” ice tickets were during several weeks paid in by the defendant in accounting for ice sold for the company; and that in accounting for ice sold the defendant turned in about $600 worth of “bad ice tickets.”

The only specific evidence that the accused received or had in his possession ice belonging to the company is that in the afternoon of a certain day “he produced a slip show*46ing how much ice he had received for the account of the company, and turned in his cash and tickets in accordance therewith. I discovered that $7.20 worth of the tickets were forged.” The “slip” is not in evidence and there is nothing to show any quantity of ice delivered to defendant as the agent for the company. Nor does it appear that any particular quantity of ice of the value of $20.00 or more belonging to the company was in the possession of the defendant as its agent and was by him embezzled or fraudently converted to his own use. This being so the charge as made is not proven in substance or in form. Even if there is proof that ice of less value than $20.00 was embezzled, which would be a misdemeanor, the conviction is of a felony.

The judgment is reversed and a new trial awarded.

Shackleford and Cockrell, J. J., concur;

Taylor, Hocker and Parkiiill J. J. concur in the opinion.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alfredo Rodriguez, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 178]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress pretrial statements set forth in the People’s CPL 710.30 notice. The detective who conducted the interrogation testified that he administered *Miranda*warnings before questioning defendant, that defendant waived his right to counsel and agreed to speak with him, and that defendant made statements to police before asking to speak with counsel. Although defendant’s testimony regarding the sequence of those events conflicted with the detective’s testimony, the court’s resolution of that credibility issue is entitled to considerable weight, and we perceive no basis in this record to disturb it *(see, People v Prochilo,*41 NY2d 759, 761; *People v Bullock,*233 AD2d 958, *lv denied*89 NY2d 940). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J.— Robbery, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Scudder, Callahan and Balio, JJ.