alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1602.47 Definition.

Under subparts O and P of this part, the term *institution of higher education* means an institutional system, college, university, community college, junior college, and any other educational institution which offers an associate degree, baccalaureate degree or higher degree or which offers a two year program of college level studies without degree. The term *college level studies* means a post secondary program which is wholly or principally creditable toward a baccalaureate degree or terminates in an associate degree.

[40 FR 25188, June 12, 1975]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4713 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4713

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt a portion of 
   unemployment compensation received during 2020 from income taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2020

 Mr. Durbin (for himself, Ms. Baldwin, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Reed, and Ms. 
    Hirono) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt a portion of 
   unemployment compensation received during 2020 from income taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Coronavirus Unemployment Benefits 
Tax Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF TAX ON PORTION OF UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 85 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Special Rule for 2020.--In the case of any taxable year 
beginning in 2020, gross income shall not include so much of the 
unemployment compensation received by an individual as does not exceed 
$10,200.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
10.2

    


    Description
of Michael Donahue’s Compensation for Serving as

    Chairman
of the Special Committee and Search Committee of the Board of
Directors

    


    On
September 25, 2009, as a result of the resignation of Greg Scholl, the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer and President, the Board of Directors of the Company
formed a Search Committee to identify qualified candidates to serve as the
Company’s chief executive officer and appointed Michael Donahue, Chairman of the
Board of Directors, to head the Search Committee.  

    


    On
October 15, 2009, the Board received a letter from Dimensional Associates LLC
(“Dimensional”), the Company’s majority stockholder, in which Dimensional
proposed entering into non-binding discussions with the Company regarding a
potential transaction.  As a result of Dimensional’s letter, the Board
formed a Special Committee comprised of independent and disinterested directors
to review and evaluate Dimensional’s proposal.  Mr. Donahue was
appointed chairman of the Special Committee.

    


    The Board
of Directors authorized the Company to compensate Mr. Donahue in the amount of
$50,000 for his services on the Search Committee and the Special Committee
through December 31, 2009.
#### PIVACCO v STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 90-163 AP

Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Dade County

February 25, 1991

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Peter W. Wildman, Esquire, for petitioner.

Avi J. Litwin, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before NADLER, CAPUA, FERRO, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

NADLER, J.

*45The State of Florida obtained an order from the court suspending the driving privileges of LAURA PIVACCO, petitioner herein. The basis for the suspension was her refusal to submit to a breath test pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 322.261, after having been charged with driving under the influence of alcoholic beverages (DUI), Fla. Stat. § 316.193.

Factually, petitioner first refused and later having agreed to the test, was less than cooperative. As such, the examining officer determined that Ms. Pivacco *refused*the chemical analysis test (emphasis added).

The record reveals and we find the petitioner did not act in good faith nor was she fully cooperative in connection with the administration of the test; that agreement to take the test while refusing to conduct oneself in a manner that will permit an objective result is tantamount to a refusal under the statute. One cannot say “yes” and do “no”.

Accordingly the Petition for Writ of Certiorari to quash the order suspending driving privileges is denied.

CAPUA and FERRO, JJ., concur.
[Nos. 19355-1-III; 19528-7-III.

Division Three.

November 7, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Terry A. DeGeus, *Appellant.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Kittitas County, No. 98-1-00075-8, Michael E. Cooper, J., entered June 2, and August 23, 2000. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, C.J., concurred in by Schultheis and Kurtz, JJ.
§ 406.161 Witness fees. ( a ) *General.* Unless otherwise authorized by the administrative law judge, the party who applies for a subpoena to compel the attendance of a witness at a deposition or hearing, or the party at whose request a witness appears at a deposition or hearing, must pay the witness fees described in this section.
( b ) *Amount.* Except for an employee of the agency who appears at the direction of the agency, a witness who appears at a deposition or hearing is entitled to the same fees and mileage expenses as are paid to a witness in a court of the United States in comparable circumstances.
§ 29.1191 Firewalls. ( a ) Each engine, including the combustor, turbine, and tailpipe sections of turbine engine installations, must be isolated by a firewall, shroud, or equivalent means, from personnel compartments, structures, controls, rotor mechanisms, and other parts that are— ( 1 ) Essential to controlled flight and landing; and
( 2 ) Not protected under § 29.861.
( b ) Each auxiliary power unit, combustion heater, and other combustion equipment to be used in flight, must be isolated from the rest of the rotorcraft by firewalls, shrouds, or equivalent means.
( c ) Each firewall or shroud must be constructed so that no hazardous quantity of air, fluid, or flame can pass from any engine compartment to other parts of the rotorcraft.
( d ) Each opening in the firewall or shroud must be sealed with close-fitting fireproof grommets, bushings, or firewall fittings.
( e ) Each firewall and shroud must be fireproof and protected against corrosion.
( f ) In meeting this section, account must be taken of the probable path of a fire as affected by the airflow in normal flight and in autorotation.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 970, Jan. 26, 1968]
#### § 67.201 Eligibility.

To be eligible for a second-class airman medical certificate, and to remain eligible for a second-class airman medical certificate, a person must meet the requirements of this subpart.
#### § 382.93 Must carriers offer preboarding to passengers with a disability?

As a carrier, you must offer preboarding to passengers with a disability who self-identify at the gate as needing additional time or assistance to board, stow accessibility equipment, or be seated.
No. 84982

ELIZABETHA. BROWN CLERK F S PRUE COURT BY 

### JUL 2 1 2022 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

SHANNA MARIE BALTAR, D.O.; AND MIRIAM SITHOLE, APRN, Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE TARA D. CLARK NEWBERRY, DISTRIC'T JUDGE, Respondents, and BARRY HEIFETZ, INDIVIDUALLY; AND SPRING VALLEY HEALTHCARE, LLC, A FOREIGN LIMITED-LIABILITY COMPANY, D/B/A SPANISH HILLS WELLNESS SUITES, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRITOFMANDAMUS Petitioners on July 20, 2022, filed a notice of withdrawal of appeal, which isconstrued asa motionforvoluntary dismissalofthismatter under NRAP 42(b). The motion is granted, and this writ proceeding is dismissed. It is so ORDERED.

cc: Hon. Tara D. Clark Newberry, District Judge John H. Cotton & Associates, Ltd.. Claggett & Sykes Law Firm McBride Hall Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
I( )i I947A
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-30-1999
<CASH>                                          14,164
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,372
<INVENTORY>                                      3,577
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,605
<PP&E>                                          31,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 225,906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,223
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           182
<OTHER-SE>                                     141,418
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   225,906
<SALES>                                        655,714
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               655,714
<CGS>                                          613,541
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  643,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 680
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,784
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,439
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,345
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,345
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50


</TABLE>
#### SHUSTER v DAVIS

Ohio Appeals, 4th Dist, Adams Co

Decided April 29, 1929

Blair & Ball, Portsmouth, for Shuster.

W P Tucker, West Union, for Davis.

MAUCK, *j:*

As above noted, the particular property in dispute is incapable of cultivation and incapabale of enclosure by boundary fences. The defendant claims that her cattle have for years crossed the creek and occupied the strip lying beyond the *343stream and says that she and her predecessors in title have sold gravel off the strip. Plaintiff shows that he has planted willows along the stream and upon the disputed tract and never understood that any claim was asserted thereto by the defendant until within the last two or three years. In order for the defendant to make her case, standing as she does without any color of title, she- must show open, notorious, exclusive, continuous and adverse possession. The showing made by her is not one of exclusive possession nor was it adverse to the plaintiff. The possession by her cattle was by no means continuous nor were all of the acts of occupancy shown by her to have been continuous. The defendant has accordingly not made her case. Where one who has no semblance of title undertakes to possess himself of the property of .another without consideration he must show such possession .as indicates an exclusive ownership of the property which he would thus acquire. His interest must appear to be hostile to the interests of the one whom he thus seeks to divest of owenrship. As an eminent authority has said: he

> “must unfurl his flag on the land, and keep it flying, so that the owner may see, if he will, that an enemy has invaded his domains, and. planted the standard of conquest”.

1 Ruling Case Law, 693.

Plaintiff is .awarded a decree as prayed for.
#### HULING et v NEAL et

Ohio Appeals, 3rd Dist, Logan Co

Decided July 24, 1929

Messrs. W. Clay Huston, Bellefontaine, and Meade C. Robinson, Marysville, for Huling et.

Messrs. John S. Huston, Degraff, and H. H. Newell, Toledo, for Neal et.

HUGHES, J.

Both deeds above referred to, conveying the half acre and the one acre to the school board for school purposes, reserved in the grantors a reversionary interest which at all times was a vested interest, subject to be enjoyed upon the abandonment of the school property for school purposes. When Robert Moore conveyed this entire property to Mary A. Huling, he divested himself of that right and Mary Ann Huling became vested with it. And wh£p. Mary Ann Huling died devising this property, including this interest, to her daughter Etta Electa Worley, she passed that interest on to her daughter, who in turn by deed to William S. Neal and Mary C. Neál, divested herself of that interest and passed it on to the Neals. When the school board abandoned this property, therefore it reverted to William S. Neal and Mary C. Neal, and_the plaintiffs’ petition must therefore be dismissed. The *602reasoning herein adopted is supported, we think by the reasoning in Jeffers v. Lampson, 10 OS. 101, at 106.

Before Judges Hughes, Justice and Crow.
§ 100.510 Self-evaluation. ( a ) The agency shall, by September 6, 1989, evaluate its current policies and practices, and the effects thereof, that do not or may not meet the requirements of this regulation and, to the extent modification of any such policies and practices is required, the agency shall proceed to make the necessary modifications.
( b ) The agency shall provide an opportunity to interested persons, including individuals with handicaps or organizations representing individuals with handicaps, to participate in the self-evaluation process by submitting comments (both oral and written).
( c ) The agency shall, for at least three years following completion of the self-evaluation, maintain on file and make available for public inspection: ( 1 ) A description of areas examined and any problems identified; and
( 2 ) A description of any modifications made.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 93 (Friday, May 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30610-30611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12047]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Management of Accelerated Technology Insertion 
II (MATI II)

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 15, 1999, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Management of Accelerated 
Technology

[[Page 30611]]

Insertion II (MATI II) has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
(1) the identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of 
the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to section 6(b) 
of the Act, the identities of the parties are The Coca-Cola Company, 
Atlanta, GA; Ford Motor Company, Redford, MI; IBD Inc., Winnetka, IL; 
Kellogg Company, Battle Creek, MI; Kraft Foods, Glenview, IL; Lucent 
Technologies, Murray Hill, NJ; McDonald's Corporation, Warrenville, IL; 
Redex Packaging Corporation, Schaumburg, IL; Rohm and Haas Company, 
Spring House, PA; and U.S.G. Corporation, Chicago, IL. Technologies 
Research Corporation of Ann Arbor, MI, has been engaged to administer 
the venture on behalf of the participants. The nature and objectives of 
the venture are to undertake research and development activities 
focusing on managing insertion 1f advanced technology.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-12047 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Editorial Note on Part 47
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 47 appear at 75 FR 41979, July 20, 2010.

§ 47.16 Temporary registration numbers. ( a ) Temporary registration numbers are issued by the FAA to manufacturers, distributors, and dealers who are holders of Dealer's Aircraft Registration Certificates, AC Form 8050-6, for temporary display on aircraft during flight allowed under Subpart C of this part.
( b ) The holder of a Dealer's Aircraft Registration Certificate may apply to the Registry for as many temporary registration numbers as are necessary for his business. The application must be in writing and include— ( 1 ) Sufficient information to justify the need for the temporary registration numbers requested; and
( 2 ) The number of each Dealer's Aircraft Registration Certificate held by the applicant. There is no charge for these numbers.
( c ) The use of temporary registration numbers is subject to the following conditions: ( 1 ) The numbers may be used and reused— ( i ) Only in connection with the holder's Dealer's Aircraft Registration Certificate;
( ii ) Within the limitations of § 47.69 where applicable, including the requirements of § 47.67; and
( iii ) On aircraft not registered under Subpart B of this part or in a foreign country, and not displaying any other identification markings.
( 2 ) A temporary registration number may not be used on more than one aircraft in flight at the same time.
( 3 ) Temporary registration numbers may not be used to fly aircraft into the United States for the purpose of importation.
( d ) The assignment of any temporary registration number to any person lapses upon the expiration of all of his Dealer's Aircraft Registration Certificates. When a temporary registration number is used on a flight outside the United States for delivery purposes, the holder shall record the assignment of that number to the aircraft and shall keep that record for at least 1 year after the removal of the number from that aircraft. Whenever the owner of an aircraft bearing a temporary registration number applies for an airworthiness certificate under Part 21 of this chapter he shall furnish that number in the application. The temporary registration number must be removed from the aircraft not later than the date on which either title or possession passes to another person.
[Amdt. 47-4, 32 FR 12556, Aug. 30, 1967, as amended by Amdt. 47-29, 75 FR 41981, July 20, 2010]
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statement  Nos.
333-82230,  333-60294,  333-53657,  333-43768,  and  333-92003  on Form  S-3 and
Registration Statement Nos. 333-53765,  333-40472,  333-79151 on Form S-8 of our
report dated  February 10, 2003 (February 26, 2003, as to Note 16) (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory  paragraphs related to
the adoption of Statement of Financial  Accounting  Standards No. 142, "Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets" and related revisions made to Note 1G and revisions
made to Note 12, related to subsidiary guarantor information related to the 2001
and 2000 consolidated  financial  statements that were audited by other auditors
who have ceased  operations  and for which we have expressed no opinion or other
form of assurance other than with respect to such disclosures) appearing in this
Annual  Report on Form 10-K/A,  Amendment No. 1 of KeySpan  Corporation  for the
year ended December 31, 2002.


/s/  Deloitte & Touche LLP
     New York, NY
     July 24, 2003
Addendum DD2 -- Proposed ASC Comment Indicators for CY 2012	
CI	Comment  Indicator Meanings
CH	"Active HCPCS code in current year and next calendar year, payment indicator assignment has changed; or active HCPCS code that is newly recognized as payable in ASC; or active HCPCS code that is discontinued at the end of the current calendar year."
NI	"New code for the next calendar year or existing code with substantial revision to its code descriptor in the next calendar year, interim payment indicator assignment; comments will be accepted on the interim payment indicator for the new code."
Exhibit 99.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard P. Begert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of ImageX, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of ImageX, Inc.

Date:  November 14, 2002

                                    By: /s/ Richard P. Begert
                                    -------------------------------
                                    Name:  Richard P. Begert
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
#### §§ 100.504-100.509 [Reserved]