alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to Section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on March 29, 2000, Dupont Pharmaceuticals, 1000 Stewart Avenue, Garden City, New York 11530, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed below: Drug
ScheduleOxycodone (9143)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIOxymorphone (9652)
II
 The firm plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances to make finished products. Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registered. Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control. Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than July 11, 2000. Dated: May 1, 2000. John H. King, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug, Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 00-11891  Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
Exhibit 23.1

                  ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE

The Board of Directors
24/7 Media, Inc.:


      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement (No. 333-66995) on Form S-8 of our report dated March 2, 1999 relating
to the consolidated balance sheet of 24/7 Media, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statement of
operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the three-year period ended
December 31, 1998 and related schedule, which report appears in the annual
report on Form 10-K of 24/7 Media, Inc.


                                              KPMG LLP
                                              /s/ KPMG LLP
New York, New York
March 29, 1999

<PAGE>

                                    SCHEDULE
                                24/7 MEDIA, INC.
                      VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS--
                        ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                        BALANCE AT          ADDITIONS                     BALANCE AT
                                        BEGINNING           CHARGED                       END
                                        OF PERIOD           TO EXPENSE     DEDUCTIONS     OF PERIOD
                                        ---------           ----------     ----------     ---------

<S>                                     <C>                 <C>            <C>            <C>
Year ended December 31, 1996            $10,000              $66,000         $10,000        $66,000
Year ended December 31, 1997            $66,000                 $---          $2,000        $64,000
Year ended December 31, 1998            $64,000             $347,000        $143,000       $268,000
</TABLE>


                                      S-1
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly report of UC Hub, Inc. on Form 10-QSB, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry Wilcox, Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Larry Wilcox

Larry Wilcox

Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)

June 14, 2008
Yo lo- Sol ano AQ MD

Adopted January

13, 2010 (F inal Dra ft Dec ember

29, 2009) Reg . I I , Rule 2.11, Pag e 1 RU LE 2 .1 1 P AR TIC UL AT E M AT TER CO NC EN TR

AT ION Ado pt e d J une 19, 1974 Revised J anuar

y 13, 2010 IN DE X 100 GENERAL 10 1 PURPOS E 102 APPL I CABI L I TY 200 DEF INITIONS 201 PARTI CUL ATE MATTER 300 STANDARDS 301 REQUI REMENT 400 MONITORING 401 TEST METHODSYo lo- Sol ano AQ MD

Adopted January

13, 2010 (F inal Dra ft Dec ember

29, 2009) Reg . I I , Rule 2.11, Pag e 2 100 GENERAL 101 P URP OSE: The purpose of this rule is to protect the am b i en t air qua lity by establishing a

particulate matter e mission s tandar d. 102 AP P LICABILIT Y: This rule applies to any source operation which emits, or may emit dust, fumes, or total suspended pa rticulate matter 200 DEF INITIONS 201 P ARTICULATE MATTER: Any mate ri a l w hi ch is e mitte d a s li qu id o r s oli d particle s, or g aseous material which become s liquid or sol id particles whe n collecte d at st and ard

c on dit ion s. 300 STANDARD 301 RE QU IREM EN T: A person shall not relea se or discha rg e into the atmosphere from any single source operation, dust, fum es , or total suspended pa rticulate matter e mis sio ns in e xce ss o f 0 .1 g ra in p e r c ub ic fo ot o f g a s at dr y sta nd ard c on dit ion s. 400 MONITORING 401 TEST M ETHO DS: 40 1. 1 Th e e xha

us t sta c k g a s ve loc ity sh a ll b e de te rm ine d in a c c or da nc e wi th E PA or CARB Te st Method 2. 401.2 The e x haust stack g as moist ure c ontent shall be dete rmined in ac corda nce with EPA or CARB Test Method 4. 40 1. 3 De te rm inatio n o f p articul ate matte r e mis sio ns sh a ll b e c on du c te d in acc ordanc e with EPA or CARB Te st Method 5. RUL E 2.11. Particulate Matter. Ex cept as otherwise permitted by law, no person shall rele ase or

discharg e into the atmos phere , from any source , particulate matter in e x cess of 0.3 g ra ins pe r c ub ic fo ot o f e xha us t vo lum e a s c a lc ulate d s tand ard c on dit ion s.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-4496

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

QUINTON RASHARD STEVENSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. J. Michelle Childs, District 

Judge. (7:15-cr-00846-JMC-1)

Submitted: February 23, 2017 Decided: February 27, 2017

Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James B. Loggins, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenville, 

South Carolina, for Appellant. Alan Lance Crick, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Quinton Rashard Stevenson appeals his within-Guidelines 40-

month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being a 

felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 

18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2012). On appeal, Stevenson’s counsel 

filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), 

asserting that he found no meritorious issues for appeal but 

questioning the length of Stevenson’s sentence. Stevenson filed

a supplemental pro se brief claiming that his plea counsel 

provided ineffective assistance of counsel. The Government has 

not responded to the Anders brief or the supplemental pro se 

brief.

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire 

record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for 

appeal. Because the record does not conclusively establish 

ineffective assistance of counsel, we conclude that those claims 

should be raised, if at all, in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. See United States v. Benton, 523 F.3d 424, 435 (4th 

Cir. 2008). We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. 

This court requires that counsel inform Stevenson, in writing, 

of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States 

for further review. If Stevenson requests that a petition be 

filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be 

frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to 
3

withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that 

a copy thereof was served on Stevenson.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 2.**

 

**Written Statement of the Controller**

 

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, the undersigned Controller of AmericasPower Partners, Inc.  (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/    Jerome P.Frett

Jerome P. Frett 

February 13, 2003 

 

22
S. 4684 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 440 Arapahoe 

Street in Thermopolis, Wyoming, as the ‘‘Robert L. Brown Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ROBERT L. BROWN POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 440 Arapahoe Street in Thermopolis, Wyoming, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Robert L. Brown Post 

Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Robert L. Brown Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

MEEKS, CLC Administrator; CITY OF 

STOCKTON; CITY OF MANTECA; SAN 

JOAQUIN COUNTY COURTS; 

PLUMMER, Stockton Police Officer; SARA 

LIZERO, SJC Probation Control Unit; SAN 

JOAQUIN COUNTY PROBATION 

DEPARTMENT; CHRISTIAN LIFE 

CHURCH; KINNEY, Security for CLC; 

NATHANIEL HANEY, Pastor CLC; 

CHRISTIAN LIFE COLLEGE; LONG, SJC 

Sheriff Deputy, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 21-16636 

D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00016-TLN-CKD 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 16, 2024**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-16636 

Before: SCHROEDER, VANDYKE, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

The motion to recall the mandate (Docket Entry No. 21) is granted. The 

February 2, 2023 order of dismissal for failure to prosecute is vacated and the 

appeal is reinstated. 

William J. Whitsitt appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing his action alleging various federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 

28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for failure to 

state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 

1112 (9th Cir. 2012). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Whitsitt’s action because Whitsitt

failed to allege facts sufficient to state any plausible claim. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 

556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (to avoid dismissal, “a complaint must contain sufficient 

factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its 

face” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

We do not consider matters raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett 

v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

The motion for judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 18) is treated as a motion 

to file a supplemental opening brief and is granted. The Clerk will file Docket 

Entry No. 19 as a supplemental opening brief.

AFFIRMED.
# FILED AUG 25 2009 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts 

### Douglas McLaren, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 

### Plaintiff, 

### v. Civil Action No. 

# 09 1611 Colin Powell, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before this court onthe plaintiffs application to proceed informapauperis, pro se complaint, motion to seal, and motion for appointed legal counsel. The court will grant the application, dismiss the complaint because it fails to state a claim upon which reliefmay be granted against this defendant, and deny the remaining motions as moot. The complaint seeks "immediate reliefofphys[ic]al, civil momentary harm," Complaint at 2, and damages of4.7 trillion dollars, 

### id at 4. The remainder ofthe four pages ofthe complaint consists ofincoherent phrases and terms, such as the following:



### Id at 2.Religious persecution, political persecution, difirmation [sic], slander, criminal slander, discrim[in]ation, racism, reverse racism discrim[in]ation. Sexual harassment harassment, invasion ofprivacy invasion criminal invasion ofprivacy violation ofdomain, to violations ofsovereign domain. Invasion ofdomain of legal filings, retal[ia]tory acts. Interference with legal filings ....
This court is obligated by federal lawto dismiss a complaint that is filed without prepayment offiling fees whenever 

### itdetermines that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which reliefmay be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Here, the complaint does notcontain any factual allegations to establish that the plaintiffhas suffered an injury attributable to the defendant. In fact, the defendant is not mentioned by name or reference outside the caption ofthe complaint. Accordingly, the complaint does not state a claim uponwhich reliefmay be granted against the defendant, and the court will dismiss the complaint. An appropriate order accompanies this memorandum 0 . .on.

Unit

- 2 -
§ 65.39 Practical experience requirements: Facility rating. Each applicant for a facility rating at any air traffic control tower must have satisfactorily served— ( a ) As an air traffic control tower operator at that control tower without a facility rating for at least 6 months; or
( b ) As an air traffic control tower operator with a facility rating at a different control tower for at least 6 months before the date he applies for the rating.
However, an applicant who is a member of an Armed Force of the United States meets the requirements of this section if he has satisfactorily served as an air traffic control tower operator for at least 6 months. [Doc. No. 1179, 27 FR 7973, Aug. 10, 1962, as amended by Amdt. 65-19, 36 FR 21280, Nov. 5, 1971]
#### § 433.1 General.

The FAA evaluates on an individual basis an applicant's proposal to operate a reentry site.
PUBLIC LAW 113–142—JULY 25, 2014 128 STAT. 1749 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3110 (S. 156): 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113–393 (Comm. on Natural Resources). 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 113–51 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources) accompanying S. 156. 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Apr. 28, considered and passed House. 

July 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–142 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To allow for the harvest of gull eggs by the Huna Tlingit people within Glacier 

Bay National Park in the State of Alaska. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Huna Tlingit Traditional Gull 

Egg Use Act’’. 

SEC. 2. LIMITED AUTHORIZATION FOR COLLECTION OF GULL EGGS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior (referred to 

in this Act as the ‘‘Secretary’’) may allow the collection by members 

of the Hoonah Indian Association of the eggs of glaucous-winged 

gulls (Laurus glaucescens) within Glacier Bay National Park 

(referred to in this Act as the ‘‘Park’’) not more frequently than 

twice each calendar year at up to 5 locations within the Park, 

subject to any terms and conditions that the Secretary determines 

to be necessary. 

(b) APPLICABLE LAW.—For the purposes of sections 203 and 

816 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (16 

U.S.C. 410hh–2, 3126), the collection of eggs of glaucous-winged 

gulls within the Park in accordance with subsection (a) shall be 

considered to be a use specifically permitted by that Act. 

(c) HARVEST PLAN.—The Secretary shall establish schedules, 

locations, and any additional terms and conditions that the Secretary determines to be necessary for the harvesting of eggs of 

glaucous-winged gulls in the Park, based on an annual harvest 

plan to be prepared by the Secretary and the Hoonah Indian 

Association. 

Approved July 25, 2014. 

Huna Tlingit 

Traditional Gull 

Egg Use Act. 

July 25, 2014 

[H.R. 3110] 


srobinson on DSKB307YQ1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-6756

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

DARNELL FREEMAN, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:02-cr-00427-LMB-1) 

Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 17, 2008 

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Darnell Freeman, Appellant Pro Se. LeDora Knight, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Darnell Freeman appeals the district court’s order 

granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for a 

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Freeman, No. 

1:02-cr-00427-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 11, 2008 & entered 

Apr. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 93 (Friday, May 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30599-30600]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11989]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1324-DR]


Maryland; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for the State of Maryland (FEMA-1324-DR), dated April 10, 
2000, and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 3, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Maryland is hereby amended to include the following area among those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe 
declared a

[[Page 30600]]

major disaster by the President in his declaration of April 10, 2000:

Caroline County for emergency protective measures (Category B) under 
Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 00-11989 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
§ 1472.650 Grant. *Grant* means an award of financial assistance that, consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6304, is used to enter into a relationship— ( a ) The principal purpose of which is to transfer a thing of value to the recipient to carry out a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by a law of the United States, rather than to acquire property or services for the Federal Government's direct benefit or use; and
( b ) In which substantial involvement is not expected between the Federal agency and the recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated by the award.
U. S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

06/08/2015 

Re: Amendment to Exemption 11240 issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform 

Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket No. FAA2014-0894

Re: Replacement of FAA-2014-0894-0007 and FAA-2014-0894-0008 dated 04/22/2015 

and 05/19/2015 respectively to reflect the correct docket number FAA-2014-0894

Dear Sir or Madam; Aerius Flight LLC, was issued an Exemption numbered 11240

(hereinafter the Exemption) for the purpose of commercial aerial survey and photography 

operations. Aerius Flight LLC, herby requests an amendment to the Exemption to allow 

an additional type of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that fully complies with the

conditions of the Exemption. 

Aerius Flight LLC, wishes to operate a DYS D800-X8 and Phantom 3 Aircraft under the 

same terms and conditions contained in the Exemption. Attached hereto, and submitted as 

a confidential document, is the Flight Operations Manual (FOM) for the additional UASs. 

All operations of the additional UASs will be in full compliance with the terms of the 

Exemption. 

As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking for only the addition of another 

type of unmanned aerial vehicle, Aerius Flight LLC respectfully submits that good cause 

exists so that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the 

requested amendment. Please contact the undersigned should you have any question 

concerning this request for an amendment to the Exemption. 

Regards,

Kenneth Beason, CEO

Aerius Flight LLC 

kbeason@aeriusflight.com

(248) 767-9092