alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



In connection with the Quarterly Report of NetMeasure Technology Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Laipnieks, President and acting CFO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Date: September 24, 2003 | By:/s/ Peter LaipnieksName:  Peter LaipnieksTitle: President and Acting CFO
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act (Humphrey-Hawkins Act)

              														Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act (Humphrey-Hawkins Act), October 27, 1978.						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1034,			accessed on August 23, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Editorial Note on Part 47
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 47 appear at 75 FR 41979, July 20, 2010.

§ 47.14 Serial numbers for unmanned aircraft. ( a ) The unmanned aircraft serial number provided as part of any application for aircraft registration of any standard remote identification unmanned aircraft must be the serial number issued by the manufacturer of the unmanned aircraft in accordance with the design and production requirements of part 89 of this chapter. The serial number provided in this application must not be listed on more than one Certificate of Aircraft Registration at the same time.
( b ) The unmanned aircraft serial number provided as part of any application for registration of any unmanned aircraft with a remote identification broadcast module must be the serial number issued by the manufacturer of the remote identification broadcast module in accordance with the design and production requirements of part 89 of this chapter. The serial number provided in this application must not be listed on more than one Certificate of Aircraft Registration at the same time.
[Docket No. FAA-2019-1100, Amdt. 47-31, 86 FR 4503, Jan. 15, 2021]
(LOGO) Firstar

March 26, 1999

Arthur Andersen LLP
425 Walnut Street
Cincinnati, Ohio  45202

Dear Sirs:

As of  and  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  1998,  Firstar  Home  Mortgage
Corporation  has complied in all material  respects with the minimum  servicing
standards as set forth in the Mortgage Bankers  Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. For the periods January 1, 1998
to November 19, 1998 and  November  20, 1998 to December 31, 1998,  Firstar Home
Mortgage  Corporation  had in effect a fidelity  bond and  errors and  omissions
policy in the  amounts  of  $80,000,000  and  $10,000,000  and  $50,000,000  and
$25,000,000, respectively.


Dan Arrigoni, President

Rick Aneshansel, Executive Vice President

Mike Norris, Senior Vice President


809 South 60th Street, Suite 210
West Alla, Wisconsin 53214
# Sheet1

# Sheet2

# Sheet3

# image1.jpeg
§ 93.317 Commercial Special Flight Rules Area operation curfew. Unless otherwise authorized by the responsible Flight Standards Office, no person may conduct a commercial Special Flight Rules Area operation in the Dragon and Zuni Point corridors during the following flight-free periods: ( a ) Summer season (May 1-September 30)-6 p.m. to 8 a.m. daily; and
( b ) Winter season (October 1-April 30)-5 p.m. to 9 a.m. daily.
[65 FR 17732, Apr. 4, 2000, as amended by Amdt. 93-102, 83 FR 48213, Sept. 24, 2018]
Exhibit 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  following  Registration
Statements:

(1)  Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-3212)  pertaining to the Columbus
     McKinnon  Corporation  1995  Incentive  Stock  Option  Plan,  the  Columbus
     McKinnon Corporation Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, the Columbus McKinnon
     Corporation  Restricted  Stock Plan and the Columbus  McKinnon  Corporation
     Employee  Stock  Ownership  Plan  Restatement  Effective  April 1,  1989 of
     Columbus McKinnon Corporation,

(2)  Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-81719)  pertaining to the Options
     assumed by Columbus McKinnon  Corporation  originally  granted under the GL
     International,  Inc.  1997  Stock  Option  Plan  and the  Larco  Industrial
     Services Ltd. 1997 Stock Option Plan, and

(3)  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-137212) pertaining to the Columbus
     McKinnon Corporation 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan

of our reports dated May 25, 2007,  with respect to the  consolidated  financial
statements  and schedule of Columbus  McKinnon  Corporation,  Columbus  McKinnon
Corporation  management's  assessment of the  effectiveness  of internal control
over  financial  reporting,  and the  effectiveness  of  internal  control  over
financial  reporting of Columbus  McKinnon  Corporation,  included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2007.


May 29, 2007
Buffalo, New York


                                       42
#### § 1202.12 National Air Transport Adjustment Board.

Under section 205, title II, of the Railway Labor Act, when in the judgment of the National Mediation Board it becomes necessary to establish a permanent national board of adjustment for the air carriers subject to the act to provide for the prompt and orderly settlement of disputes between the employees and the carriers growing out of grievances, or out of the application or interpretation of working agreements, the Board is empowered by its order made, published, and served, to direct the air carriers and labor organizations, national in scope, to select and designate four representatives to constitute a Board known as the National Air Transport Adjustment Board. Two members each shall be selected by the air carriers and the labor organizations of their employees. Up to the present time, it has not been considered necessary to establish the National Air Transport Adjustment Board.
# EUR-Lex - 31998R2387 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998R2387

**Commission Regulation (Euratom) No 2387/98 of 3 November 1998 concerning the accession by the European Atomic Energy Community, and the European Community, acting as one party, to an Agreement having established in 1993 a Science and Technology Centre in Ukraine between Canada, Sweden, Ukraine and the United States of America **

*
Official Journal L 297 , 06/11/1998 P. 0004 - 0004 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EURATOM) No 2387/98 of 3 November 1998 concerning the accession by the European Atomic Energy Community, and the European Community, acting as one party, to an Agreement having established in 1993 a Science and Technology Centre in Ukraine between Canada, Sweden, Ukraine and the United States of America

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community and in particular the second paragraph of Article 101 thereof,

Having regard to the Council's approval,

Whereas the accession by the European Atomic Energy Community and the European Community, acting as one Party, to the Agreement having established in 1993 a Science and Technology Centre in Ukraine between Canada, Sweden, Ukraine and the United States of America, should be approved on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The accession by the European Atomic Energy Community and the European Community, acting as one Party, to the Agreement having established in 1993 a Science and Technology Centre in Ukraine between Canada, Sweden, Ukraine and the United States of America, as modified by the Protocol of 7 July 1997 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Agreement`), and the Declaration of the European Communities relating to Article 1 are hereby approved on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community.

The texts of the Agreement, the Instrument of Accession, and the Declaration are annexed to this Regulation (1).

Article 2

One Representative of the Community on the Governing Board shall be appointed by each of the Council and the Commission pursuant to Article IV(C) of the Agreement.

Article 3

The Science and Technology Centre in Ukraine has legal personality and will enjoy the most extensive legal capacity accorded to legal persons under laws applicable in the Community and, in particular, may contract, acquire or dispose of movable and immovable property and be a party to legal proceedings.

Article 4

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 November 1998.

For the Commission

The President

Jacques SANTER

(1) OJ L 225, 12. 8. 1998, p. 4.
#### § 1610.32 Production prohibited unless approved by the Legal Counsel.

No employee or former employee of the Commission shall, in response to a demand of a court or other authority, produce any material contained in the files of the Commission or disclose any information or produce any material acquired as part of the performance of his official duties or because of his official status without the prior approval of the Legal Counsel.

[32 FR 16261, Nov. 29, 1967, as amended at 47 FR 46275, Oct. 18, 1982]
§ 1601.26 Confidentiality of endeavors. ( a ) Nothing that is said or done during and as part of the informal endeavors of the Commission to eliminate unlawful employment practices by informal methods of conference, conciliation, and persuasion may be made a matter of public information by the Commission, its officers or employees, or used as evidence in a subsequent proceeding without the written consent of the persons concerned. This provision does not apply to such disclosures to the representatives of Federal, State or local agencies as may be appropriate or necessary to the carrying out of the Commission's functions under title VII, the ADA, GINA, or the PWFA: *Provided, however,* That the Commission may refuse to make disclosures to any such agency which does not maintain the confidentiality of such endeavors in accord with this section or in any circumstances where the disclosures will not serve the purposes of the effective enforcement of title VII, the ADA, GINA, or the PWFA.
( b ) Factual information obtained by the Commission during such informal endeavors, if such information is otherwise obtainable by the Commission under section 709 of title VII, for disclosure purposes will be considered by the Commission as obtained during the investigatory process.
[42 FR 55388, Oct. 14, 1977, as amended at 56 FR 9625, Mar. 7, 1991; 74 FR 63982, Dec. 7, 2009; 89 FR 11169, Feb. 14, 2024]
# EUR-Lex - 31998D0296 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998D0296

**98/296/EC: Commission Decision of 23 April 1998 amending Decision 83/471/EEC relating to the Community Inspection Committee on the application of the classification scale for carcases of adult bovine animals **

*
Official Journal L 132 , 06/05/1998 P. 0015 - 0015 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 23 April 1998 amending Decision 83/471/EEC relating to the Community Inspection Committee on the application of the classification scale for carcases of adult bovine animals (98/296/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1208/81 of 28 April 1981 determining the Community scale for the classification of carcases of adult bovine animals (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1026/91 (2), and in particular the fourth paragraph of Article 5 thereof,

Whereas, in the light of experience gained, the detailed rules covering the membership of the inspection committee provided for in Article 5 of the abovementioned Regulation, the intervals at which on-the-spot inspections are to be carried out and the deadline for the forwarding of inspection reports should be adapted; whereas Commission Decision 83/471/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 95/201/EC (4), should be adapted accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Beef and Veal,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 83/471/EEC is hereby amended as follows:

1. Article 2(2) is replaced by the following:

'2. On-the-spot inspections shall be carried out in a given Member State by a delegation of the committee comprising at most:

- three Commission experts, one of whom shall act as chairman of the Committee,

- one expert from the Member State concerned,

- eight experts from other Member States.`;

2. the first subparagraph of Article 3(2) is replaced by the following:

'2. On-the-spot inspections shall be carried out at regular intervals in each Member State and may, where necessary, be followed by additional visits.

In such cases, the membership of the Committee may be reduced.`;

3. Article 4(2) is replaced by the following:

'2. The Committee chairman shall draw up a report on the inspections conducted and containing the conclusions referred to in paragraph 1. The report shall be sent at the earliest possibility to the Member State inspected and to the other Member States subsequently.`

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 April 1998.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 123, 7. 5. 1981, p. 3.

(2) OJ L 106, 26. 4. 1991, p. 2.

(3) OJ L 259, 20. 9. 1983, p. 30.

(4) OJ L 128, 13. 6. 1995, p. 18.
#### Suzett *v.*Buckels.

In an action on the case for enticing away and harboring a slave, when one witness described the slave, the court held, that it was competent to ask another witness if he had seen a slave on the defendant’s plantation answering to the description. Identity may be proved either by positive or circumstantial testimony.

IN ERROR from the circuit court of the county of Franklin.

Yannerson for plaintiff in error.

Montgomery & Boyd, contra.

Opinion by

Clayton, J.

This was an action on the case, in the circuit court of Franklin county, for unlawfully enticing away and harboring a negro slave, belonging to Suzett, the plaintiff. Several errors are assigned in the proceedings of the court below; one only need be noticed by us. The plaintiff introduced a witness by whom he proved that he was the owner of a slave named Edmund, who had absconded from him in January, 1838, and was recovered by him in August of the same year, in Franklin county. He described the negro to be about five feet ten inches in height, and of black complexion. Another witness was then introduced, who was asked if he had seen a negro on the defendant’s plantation during the period mentioned by the former witness; to which he answered affirmatively. He was then asked if the negro he had seen was like the one described by the former witness. The counsel for the defendant objected to the answering of this question by the witness, and insisted that the plaintiff must first prove the identity of the slave, and his ownership. The court sustained the objection, and *664directed the witness not to answer. An exception was taken to this opinion.

It is certainly true, that to enable the plaintiff to recover he must have identified the slave in question as his property. That was a fact which he was bound to make out to the satisfaction of the jury. He might do this, either by positive or circumstantial testimony. The inquiry then arises, whether the question asked of the witness, and rejected by the court, tended to prove the matter in issue. We think that it did: and if the plaintiff did not have it in his power to produce direct testimony, that he ought not to have been precluded from proof of circumstances from which the jury might have formed a proper and satisfactory conclusion.

The judgment will be reversed, and a new trial awarded.

Judgment reversed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 380

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 380 appear at 84 FR 15940, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 380.14 Unused space.

Nothing contained in this part shall preclude a charter operator from utilizing any unused space on an aircraft by it for a Public Charter for the transportation, on a free or reduced basis, of such charter operator's employees, directors, and officers, and parents and immediate families of such persons.

[Docket No. OST-97-2356, 63 FR 28241, May 22, 1998, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15940, Apr. 16, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF THE
COMPANY AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      47,038,633
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,249,837
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            53,664,920
<PP&E>                                       1,025,776
<DEPRECIATION>                                 537,149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,199,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,183,501
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        88,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,927,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,199,248
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,085,662
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  366,595
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,501,716
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 572
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,708,298
<INCOME-TAX>                                   649,153
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,059,145
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,059,145
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10


</TABLE>
#### MINDERMAN v LOY.

Ohio Appeals, 2nd Dist., Montgomery Co.

No. 848.

Decided Aug. 3, 1928.

Otterbein Creager, Dayton, for Minder-man.

Estabrook, Finn & McKee, Dayton, for Loy.

*46FERNEDING, P J.

It is true, there is a stipulation at the end of the note and above the signature to the effect that the note will be due on March 1, 1925, when the first payment on the farm was to be made.

This does not, in our judgment, affect the validity of the cognovit or the validity of the note. We think counsel for the plaintiff in error improperly assumes that a conditional note cannot be made a promissory note so as to make available a cognovit attached thereto. The provision that a note must be for the unconditional payment of money to be a negotiable note, is not applied here, as the plaintiff below does not claim that his note is a negotiable note.

We are therefore of opinion that in the absense of some showing in- the court below of prejudice to the defendant, the motion to vacate the judgment is properly overruled.

Kunkle and Allread, JJ concur.
#### FAULK & CO. v. WILLIAMS.

(Decided June 8, 1916.)

Appeal from Geneva Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per Curiam.

Settled, and appeal dismissed.
#### Palmer Advertising Service, Inc., Respondent, *v.*Grinnell Company, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Village of Tarrytown, Appellant.

(Argued June 5, 1936;

decided July 8, 1936.)

*488
      *John J. Dillon*and *Herbert V. A. Hall*for appellant.

*Manfred W. Ehrich*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

...Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien,. Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.