alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 97
Editorial Note: The procedures for §§ 97.21 through 97.37, respectively, are not carried in the Code of Federal Regulations. For Federal Register citations affecting these procedures, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 97.20 General. ( a ) This subpart prescribes standard instrument approach procedures and takeoff minimums and obstacle departure procedures (ODPs) based on the criteria contained in FAA Order 8260.3, U.S. Standard for Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPs), and other related Orders in the 8260 series that also address instrument procedure design criteria.
( b ) Standard instrument approach procedures and associated supporting data adopted by the FAA are documented on FAA Forms 8260-3, 8260-4, 8260-5. Takeoff minimums and obstacle departure procedures (ODPs) are documented on FAA Form 8260-15A. These forms are incorporated by reference. The Director of the Federal Register approved this incorporation by reference pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. The standard instrument approach procedures and takeoff minimums and obstacle departure procedures (ODPs) are available for examination at the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590, and at Aeronautical Information Services, 1305 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email: *fedreg.legal@nara.gov*, or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) Standard instrument approach procedures and takeoff minimums and obstacle departure procedures (ODPs) are depicted on aeronautical charts published by the FAA. These charts are available from the FAA at *https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/ .*
[Doc. No. FAA-2002-14002, 72 FR 31680, June 7, 2007, as amended by Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 97-1338, 83 FR 9172, Mar. 5, 2018; Docket No. FAA-2022-1355, Amdt. No. 97-1339, 87 FR 75846, Dec. 9, 2022]
#### § 60.14 Special equipment and personnel requirements for qualification of the FSTD.

When notified by the responsible Flight Standards office, the sponsor must make available all special equipment and qualified personnel needed to accomplish or assist in the accomplishment of tests during initial qualification, continuing qualification, or special evaluations.

[Docket No. FAA-2002-12461, 71 FR 63426, Oct. 30, 2006, as amended by Docket No. FAA-2022-1355, Amdt. No. 60-7, 87 FR 75711, Dec. 9, 2022]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*John H. Foote et al., Appellants, and Town of Hempstead, Respondent.

Argued March 8, 1937;

decided March 23, 1937.

*631
      *Lillian M. Kooperstein, William H. Bisnoff*and *Moses Kooperstein*for Grace M. Alling et al., appellants.

*Milton Pinkus*and *Charles E. Russell*for Evelyn Bird et al., infants, by George A. Littlejohn, as guardian ad litem, appellants.

*Louis W. McKernan*for Willis M. Moore et al., appellants.

*Eugene R. Hurley*and *Benjamin Kaplan*for David Bandler et al., appellants.

*Alfred T. Davison*and *James M. Gray*for town of Hempstead, respondent.

*John J. Bennett, Attorney-General (Henry Epstein, G. Frank Dougherty, Ruth I. Wilson*and *Raymond P. McNulty*of counsel), for the People of the State of New York, respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs, on authority of *People*v. *Foote*(273 N. Y. 629). No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
#### ZINGALE in re

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9500.

Decided Mar 4, 1929

L E Appleton, Cleveland, for Zingale.

Carl F Shuler, Cleveland, for Walsh.

Judges WILLIAMS and RICHARDS of the Sixth Dist sitting

*247WILLIAMS, J.

Under Section 4134, General Code, an officer vested by statute with authority to manage a workhouse, may allow a prisoner to go upon parole outside of the buildings and enclosures, but during such time the prisoner remains in the legal custody and under control of such officer, and subject at any time to be taken back within the enclosure of the institution. While on parole, under this seétion, the prisoner is as much in custody as if he still remained in the workhouse, and .the only power in the municipal court, if any, was to order the part of the sentence that was suspended to be carried into execution. The court, however, had no jurisdiction or power to make an order which would interfere with the parole, and if the municipal court ordered the sentence to be fully executed it would merely increase the length of time which the convicted person was required to serve, but would not revoke the parole. The order of the municipal court, in so far as it required the arrest of "relator,, was wholly beyond the jurisdiction of the municipal court and absolutely void. Whether the prisoner should be in legal custody within the walls of the workhouse or without the wall on parole, was vested wholly in the discretion of the manager of the workhouse. With this discretion the municipal court could not interfere, even though it had power to order the suspended part of the sentence carried into execution.

The court made no order that the relator should stand committed until the fine and costs were paid, secured to be paid, or he was otherwise discharged according to law. The full period of both sentences has now expired and, as the relator has been in custody during the whole period and the sentence is fully executed, to arrest him now would serve no purpose.

The judgment of the court of common pleas is reversed and this court, rendering the judgment which the common pleas court should have rendered, allows the writ of habeas corpus, and the relator is discharged from the custody under the order of arrest issued by the municipal court at the April, 1928, term of said court.

Richards, J, I concur in the judgment discharging the relator from custody.

Lloyd, J, not participating.
#### § 1605.1 “Religious” nature of a practice or belief.

In most cases whether or not a practice or belief is religious is not at issue. However, in those cases in which the issue does exist, the Commission will define religious practices to include moral or ethical beliefs as to what is right and wrong which are sincerely held with the strength of traditional religious views. This standard was developed in *United States* v. *Seeger,* 380 U.S. 163 (1965) and *Welsh* v. *United States,* 398 U.S. 333 (1970). The Commission has consistently applied this standard in its decisions.[1] The fact that no religious group espouses such beliefs or the fact that the religious group to which the individual professes to belong may not accept such belief will not determine whether the belief is a religious belief of the employee or prospective employee. The phrase “religious practice” as used in these Guidelines includes both religious observances and practices, as stated in section 701(j), 42 U.S.C. 2000e(j).

###### Footnotes -
  1605.1

[1] See CD 76-104 (1976), CCH ¶ 6500; CD 71-2620 (1971), CCH ¶ 6283; CD 71-779 (1970), CCH ¶ 6180.
# EUR-Lex - 31998R0203 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998R0203

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 203/98 of 26 January 1998 amending Regulation (EEC) No 4154/87 laying down the methods of analysis and other technical provisions necessary for the application of the import procedure for goods obtained by processing agricultural products **

*
Official Journal L 021 , 28/01/1998 P. 0006 - 0006 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 203/98 of 26 January 1998 amending Regulation (EEC) No 4154/87 laying down the methods of analysis and other technical provisions necessary for the application of the import procedure for goods obtained by processing agricultural products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2509/97 (2), and in particular Article 9 thereof,

Whereas in order to ensure that goods subject to Council Regulation (EC) No 3448/93 (3) receive uniform treatment on import throughout the Community, the provisions of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 4154/87 (4) concerning determination of milk fats should be amended;

Whereas studies and tests carried out by the laboratories responsible for such testing indicate that the most appropriate procedure is the one laid down in Article 1;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Customs Code Committee, Tariff and Statistical Nomenclature Section,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 2(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 4154/87 is hereby replaced by the following text:

'3. Milk fat content

(a) Save as otherwise provided in paragraph (b), the milk fat content by weight shall be determined by extraction with light petroleum after hydrolysis with hydrochloric acid.

(b) Where fats other than milk fats are also declared in the composition of the goods, the following procedure shall be applied:

- the percentage of weight of the total fats in the goods shall be determined as mentioned in paragraph (a),

- for the purposes of determining the milk fat content, a method based on extraction with light petroleum, preceded by hydrolysis with hydrochloric acid and followed by gas chromatography of the methyl esters of the fatty acids, shall be used. If the presence of milk fats is detected, the percentage proportion thereof shall be calculated by multiplying the percentage concentration of methyl butyrate by 25, multiplying the product by the total percentage fat content by weight of the goods and dividing by 100.`

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 21st day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 January 1998.

For the Commission

Mario MONTI

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 256, 7. 9. 1987, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 345, 16. 12. 1997, p. 44.

(3) OJ L 318, 20. 12. 1993, p. 18.

(4) OJ L 392, 31. 12. 1987, p. 19.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

and the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cost
Plus, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 3, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Barry J. Feld, Chief Executive Officer and President of
the Company, and Jane L. Baughman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                   
|/S/ BARRY J. FELD                                                                                                  
|Barry J. Feld Chief Executive Officer, President (Principal Executive Officer)  December 10, 2007                  
|                                                                                                                   
|/S/ JANE L. BAUGHMAN                                                                                               
|Jane L. Baughman Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)  December 10, 2007
#### § 1450.31 Other sanctions.

The sanctions stated in this subpart are not intended to be exclusive. Other sanctions which may be imposed by the Director of FMCS include placement of the debtor's name on a list of debarred, suspended or ineligible contractors or grantees; conversion of method of payment under a grant from an advance payment method to a reimbursement method; or revocation of a letter of credit. Notice will be given by FMCS to the debtor regarding the imposition of such other sanctions.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I,Terry G. Roussel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best ofmy knowledge the Quarterly Report of Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of CornerstoneRealty Fund, LLC.

 
|                               |     /s/ TERRY G. ROUSSEL                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  August 13th, 2003 | Terry  G. Roussel  Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive   Officer) of Cornerstone Ventures, Inc.,   the   Manager of Cornerstone Industrial Properties,   LLC, the Managing Member of Cornerstone   Realty Fund, LLC |

 

----
# EUR-Lex - 31997F0719(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31997F0719(01)

**Council Act of 19 June 1997 drawing up, on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union and Article 41 (3) of the Europol Convention, the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of Europol, the members of its organs, the Deputy Directors and employees of Europol **

*
Official Journal C 221 , 19/07/1997 P. 0001 - 0001 *

COUNCIL ACT of 19 June 1997 drawing up, on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union and Article 41 (3) of the Europol Convention, the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of Europol, the members of its organs, the Deputy Directors and employees of Europol (97/C 221/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article K.3,

Having regard to the Convention based on Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention) (1), and in particular Article 41 (3) thereof,

Considering that Europol, the members of its organs, the Deputy Directors and employees of Europol shall enjoy the privileges and immunities necessary for the performance of their tasks in accordance with a Protocol setting out rules to be applied in all Member States,

HAS DECIDED on the drawing up of the Protocol, the text of which is attached hereto, which has been signed today by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union,

RECOMMENDS that it be adopted by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

Done at Luxembourg, 19 June 1997.

For the Council

The President

M. DE BOER

(1) OJ No C 316, 27. 11. 1995, p. 1.
U.S. Department of Energy

Manufactured Housing Working Group

September 22 -23, 2014

Summary

Day 1: September 22, 2014

 Assembly, Logistics and Introductions of attendees.

 Emanuel Levy, Systems Building Research Alliance presented

cost data

 DOE (Navigant) presented LCC with Updated Cost Data and 

Annual Energy Runs Presentation with consensus being 

reached on a majority of the items reviewed.

 Comments from the Public

 Wrap Up and Next Steps

Day 2: September 23, 2014

 Assembly, Logistics and Introductions of attendees.

 Cont. DOE (Navigant) presented LCC with Updated Cost 

Data and Annual Energy Runs Presentation with consensus 

being reached on a majority of the report.

 Continuation of Subcommittee reports with parties 

cleaning up more of the 2015 IECC mandatory components

 Review Road Map for additional action items and 

adjustments

 Floor was opened for public comment.

 Group discussed next steps, reviewed the schedule and 

concluding comments.

Next Dates:

DATE Location Room Webinar Link

October 1, 2014 DOE Forrestal GH-019 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/585091001

October 2, 2014 DOE Forrestal GH-019 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/726540504
§ 1430.8 Advisory committee meetings. ( a ) *Initiation of meetings.* ( 1 ) Committee meetings may be called by: ( i ) The Director or the head of the office most directly concerned with the committee's activities;
( ii ) The agency officer referred to in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, and the committee chairman, jointly; or
( iii ) The committee chairman, with the advance approval of the officer referred to in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section.
( 2 ) The Service's committee management officer shall be promptly informed that a meeting has been called.
( b ) *Agenda.* Committee meetings shall be based on agenda approved by the officer referred to in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. Such agenda shall note those items which may involve matters which have been determined by the Office of the General Counsel as coming within the exemptions to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b).
( c ) *Notice of meetings.* ( 1 ) Notice of advisory committee meetings shall be published in the Federal Register at least 7 days before the date of the meeting, irrespective of whether a particular meeting will be open to the public. Notice to interested persons shall also be provided in such other reasonable ways as are appropriate under the circumstances, such as press release or letter. Responsibility for preparation of Federal Register and other appropriate notice shall be with the officer referred to in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( 2 ) Notice in the Federal Register shall state all pertinent information related to a meeting and shall be published at least 7 days prior to a meeting.
( d ) *Presence of agency officer or employee at meetings.* No committee shall meet without the presence of the officer referred to in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, or his delegate. At his option the officer or employee may elect to chair the meeting.
( e ) *Minutes.* Detailed minutes shall be kept of all committee meetings and shall be certified by the chairman of the advisory committee as being accurate.
( f ) *Adjournment.* The officer or employee referred to in paragraph (a)(1) of this section may adjourn a meeting at any time he determines it in the public interest to do so.
( g ) *Public access to committee meetings.* All advisory committee meetings shall be open to the public, except when the Office of the General Counsel determines, in writing, and states his reasons therefor prior to Federal Register notice, that a meeting or any part thereof, is concerned with matters related to the exemptions provided in the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In such instances, those portions of a committee meeting which come within the section 552(b) exemptions may be closed to the public.
( h ) *Public participation in committee procedures.* Interested persons shall be permitted to file statements with advisory committees. Subject to reasonable committee procedures, interested persons may also be permitted to make oral statements on matters germane to the subjects under consideration at the committee meeting.
### Author: ICF Consulting, Inc; Abt Associates, Inc.

Source: Integrated Planning Model (IPM) Date Created: 6/18/2008 Date Modified: 3/30/2011 Purpose: Contains NERC region level electricity, coal, and natural gas prices for Option 2: IM Everywhere and EM for Facilities with DIF>125MGD policy IPM run.

File Contents: Worksheet Contents
ToAbt NERC region level electricity, coal, and natural gas prices for Option 2: IM Everywhere and EM for Facilities with DIF>125MGD policy run IPM run.

Input Files: External data used in calculations/analysis: None.

FileInfo 1 of 2NERC Level Prices - EPA302ABT_PC_2b Capacity Price ($/kW-yr) Energy Price (mills/kWh) NERC Region 2015 2020 2025 2028 2015 2020 2025 2028 FRCC 9.85 31.16 38.02 59.18 61.84 57.81 52.28 53.09 MRO 2.52 54.40 65.11 77.64 34.98 39.55 39.06 40.26 NPCC 7.32 43.06 53.69 77.92 61.04 61.69 57.48 60.05 RFC 4.45 64.48 61.56 75.20 36.41 41.86 40.56 41.66 SERC 14.06 42.32 58.96 72.91 41.58 44.55 42.14 43.21 SPP 12.39 24.15 36.86 45.23 42.20 42.51 40.29 41.65 TRE 16.70 33.11 42.20 54.28 53.27 52.31 48.06 50.01 WECC 4.71 23.75 47.17 62.18 48.99 49.09 44.30 45.50

Natural Gas Price ($/MMBtu) Coal Price ($/MMBtu) NERC Region 2015 2020 2025 2028 2015 2020 2025 2028 FRCC 6.33 6.46 6.07 6.35 2.27 2.24 2.03 2.11 MRO 5.88 5.80 5.57 5.88 1.27 1.25 1.25 1.27 NPCC 6.75 6.89 6.52 6.82 2.05 2.03 2.05 2.12 RFC 6.47 6.49 6.13 6.45 1.53 1.53 1.55 1.62 SERC 6.02 6.00 5.82 6.11 1.74 1.72 1.70 1.73 SPP 5.70 5.52 5.38 5.68 1.18 1.15 1.18 1.20 TRE 5.71 5.64 5.47 5.79 1.60 1.53 1.56 1.64 WECC 5.93 6.11 5.70 6.01 1.30 1.30 1.35 1.38

ToAbt 2 of 2
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

December 2, 2003 Session

MYRTLE MARIE STAGNER v. LLOYD OTIS STAGNER

Appeal from the Chancery Court for Jefferson County

No. 02-157 Telford E. Forgety, Chancellor

FILED FEBRUARY 27, 2004

No. E2003-00610-COA-R3-CV

CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., concurring.

I concur in the majority opinion. I write separately to further address the majority’s treatment

of the Illinois farm. I agree with the majority that the use of the parties’ joint accounts – to which

both parties contributed – to pay “real estate taxes, insurance premiums, repairs and maintenance on

the farm” during the parties’ 19-year marriage is clear evidence that “each party substantially

contributed to [the Illinois farm’s] preservation and appreciation.” See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-

121(b)(1)(B). This means that the entire “increase in value [of the Illinois farm] during the

marriage,” see id., is marital property. Obviously this does not end the inquiry, because the trial

court on remand must decide how to make an equitable division of the marital property portion of

the present value of the farm in the context of an overall division of the total marital property estate.

See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-121(c)(1)-(11).

_______________________________

CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., JUDGE