alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31998R0395 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998R0395

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 395/98 of 19 February 1998 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2807/83 laying down detailed rules for recording information on Member States' catches of fish **

*
Official Journal L 050 , 20/02/1998 P. 0017 - 0017 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 395/98 of 19 February 1998 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2807/83 laying down detailed rules for recording information on Member States' catches of fish

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2635/97 (2), and in particular Article 19e(5) thereof,

Whereas Council Regulation (EC) No 779/97 (3) introduces arrangements for the management of fishing effort in the Baltic Sea with effect from 1 January 1998;

Whereas Regulation (EC) No 2635/97 amended Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 to ensure compliance with the arrangements for the management of fishing effort in the Baltic Sea;

Whereas the amendments relate to, inter alia, the provisions for recording data on fishing effort in the logbook;

Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2807/83 (4), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2945/95 (5), lays down rules for recording information on Member States' catches of fish;

Whereas pursuant to Article 19e(5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 detailed rules for recording information on fishing effort in the logbook should be laid down in order to implement the arrangements for the management of fishing effort referred to in Regulation (EC) No 779/97;

Whereas Regulation (EEC) No 2807/83 should be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Fisheries and Aquaculture,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EEC) No 2807/83 is hereby amended as follows:

1. in Article 1a(1) the following is added after 'Council Regulation (EC) No 685/95`: 'and in Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 779/97 (*),

(*) OJ L 113, 30.4.1997, p. 1.`;

2. in Annex VIa:

- in the column 'Group of target species`, the following is added:

>TABLE>

- in the column 'Effort zones`, the following is added:

'T: IBSFC areas (subdivisions 22 to 32)

U: Management Unit 3 (*)

(*) Comprising subdivisions 29, 30 and 31 north of latitude 59°30' N.`

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 1 July 1998.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 February 1998.

For the Commission

Emma BONINO

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 261, 20. 10. 1993, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 356, 31. 12. 1997, p. 14.

(3) OJ L 113, 30. 4. 1997, p. 1.

(4) OJ L 276, 10. 10. 1983, p. 1.

(5) OJ L 308, 21. 12. 1995, p. 18.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SunCoast Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, John T. Stafford, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ John T. Stafford                 
|                     |  |     |  | John T. Stafford, President and Chief
|                     |  |     |  | Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 23537]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10196]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

[Document Number AMS-NOP-11-0014; NOP-11-05]

Notice of Meeting of the National Organic Standards Board

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) announced on March 4, 
2011 a forthcoming meeting of the National Organic Standards Board 
(NOSB) (76 FR 12013). The March 4, 2011 notice provided for five-minute 
public comment slots. Due to the overwhelming number of people who have 
signed up to present comments, AMS is informing the public that each 
public comment slot will be three minutes.

DATES: The NOSB meeting dates are Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 8 a.m. to 
5:30 p.m.; Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.; Thursday, April 
28, 2011, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.; and Friday, April 29, 2011, 8 a.m. to 4:45 
p.m.

    Dated: April 22, 2011.
David R. Shipman,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-10196 Filed 4-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
```
#### STALLEY v STATE

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

*No*9254.

Decided June 17, 1929

John F. Wilson, Hillsboro, and Harold F. Gorman, Cleveland, for Stalley.

Ray T. Miller and E. J. Hopple, both of Cleveland, for State,

*489SULLIVAN, J.

From an examination of the language used over the telephone it is our unanimous conclusion, forced by the record, the inferences therefrom, as well as the circumstances, that there is no other motive apparent from the language excepting to create a favorable impression upon the juror of the testimony given by, plaintiff in error, or, to create an inducement in the way of possible business favor upon which the juror might act in his deliberations. In other words, searching in vain for a legitimate motive, if there could have been one, the conclusion is irresistible from the language employed, that the purpose of the telephone call and convesation was to influence the juror with respect to the testimony given by the plaintiff in error in the appropriation case.

Under 12136 GC. a court or a judge at chambers may summarily punish a person guilty of misbehavior in the presence of the court or judge, if its tendency is to obstruct the administration of justice, and under 12138 GC. if written charges are made and a hearing had, the court has power to sentence as in the case at bar, ,and from a reading of Corpus Juris Vol. 13 p. 22, Sec. 67, we read what is undoubtedly the law of the land that all wilful attempts improperly to influence jurors in the impartial discharge of their duties is contempt, whether it be by conversation, over the phone or in the presence of each other or by attempts to bribe, and in Goldner et al vs State of Ohio, 19 O. C. C. (NS) 317, we quote from the syllabus as follows:

(Here follows quotation)

Holding these views the judgment of the lower court is hereby affirmed.

Vickery, PJ, and Levine, J, concur.
EQUITABLE ACTIONS.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

1898.]

Cox, Smith and Swing, JJ.

#### Ireland v. Loomis, Admr.

Equitable Action Does not Lie to Recover Personalty.

*An*equitable action will not lie in Ohio for the recovery of personal property.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.

*Hagans & Hagans,*for the plaintiff in error.

*Cleveland & Bowler,*for the administrator.

Swing, J.

We think the judgment of the court of common should be reversed, for the reason that the petition of the plaintiff in that court does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and plaintiff’s petition should have been dismissed. The action of the plaintiff was a suit in equity, to recover the possession of certain personal property other than heirlooms or written evidences, upon which a suit at law might have been brought. We have no such actions in Ohio, although it is alleged that the defendant conceals the property and is insolvent. The authority cited from Massachusetts is not in point, as in that case the court holds in favor of the action by reason oi the terms of their statute. We have no such statute in Ohio.

Plaintiff’s action should have been under sec. 6053 *et seq,*Rev. Stat. and under the provisions of the statute in aid of execution. There is no statute in our state which authorizes an equitable action for the recovery of personal property, and without which there is no such right ex-' cept as above referred to.

The judgment should be reversed and the cause remanded to the court of common pleas with instructions to dismiss plaintiff’s petition.
# EUR-Lex - 31996R2333 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996R2333

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2333/96 of 5 December 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 2051/96 laying down certain detailed rules for granting of assistance for the export of beef and veal which may benefit from a special import treatment in Canada and amending Regulation (EC) No 1445/95 **

*
Official Journal L 317 , 06/12/1996 P. 0013 - 0013 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2333/96 of 5 December 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 2051/96 laying down certain detailed rules for granting of assistance for the export of beef and veal which may benefit from a special import treatment in Canada and amending Regulation (EC) No 1445/95

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common organization of the market in beef and veal (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2222/96 (2), and in particular Articles 9 and 13 thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EC) No 2051/96 (3) lays down certain detailed rules for export of beef to Canada in particular by providing for a quarterly management of certificates; whereas in the light of the Canadian rules of implementation of the WTO tariff quota for beef certain provisions of Commission Regulations (EC) No 2051/96 and (EC) No 1445/95 (4), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2051/96, should be amended;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Beef and Veal,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 1 (1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2051/96 is replaced by the following:

'1. This Regulation establishes certain detailed rules of application in respect of exports to Canada of 5 000 tonnes per calendar year of beef and veal of Community origin, fresh, chilled or frozen, qualifying for special treatment.`

Article 2

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1445/95 is hereby amended as follows:

1. Article 12 a (6) is replaced by the following:

'6. Licence applications may be lodged only in the first five days of each month.`;

2. in the last sentence of Article 12 a (8) the word 'quarter` shall be replaced by the word 'month.`;

3. Article 12 a (9) is replaced by the following:

'9. Licences shall be issued on the 21 st day of each month at the latest.`

Article 3

This Regulation enters into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 1 January 1997.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 December 1996.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 148, 28. 6. 1968, p. 24.

(2) OJ No L 296, 21. 11. 1996, p. 50.

(3) OJ No L 274, 26. 10. 1996, p. 18.

(4) OJ No L 143, 27. 6. 1995, p. 35.
#### WOLF et v MARSHALL et

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21321.

Decided Mar 27, 1929

Sllyabus by

KINKADE, J.

PLEADINGS

(440 A4) Section 1687, General Code, does not require the filing of an affidavit of prejudice at least three days before the time of trial in cases where it is impossible to identify, the judge before whom the case is to be tried at least three days before the trial.

In such cases, if the affidavit be fiied at the earliest moment when counsel can know who the trial judge is to be, and before- the beginning of the trial, it is the duty of the trial judge to be governed by the affidavit of prejudice so filed in all respects the same as if it had been filed at least three days prior to the day of trial, and to disregard such affidavit of prejudice and proceed with the trial constitutes prejudicial error.

Marshall, CJ, Robinson and Jones, JJ, concur. Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ, dissent.
#### § 101.25 Appeal from the dismissal of a petition, or from the refusal to process it under the expedited procedure.

If it is determined after investigation of the representation petition that further proceedings based thereon are not warranted, the regional director, absent withdrawal of the petition, dismisses it, stating the grounds therefor. If it is determined that the petition does not meet the requirements for processing under the expedited procedure, the regional director advises the petitioner of the determination to process the petition under the procedures described in subpart C of 29 CFR part 102 and the statement of the general course. In either event, the regional director informs all the parties of such action, and such action is final, although the Board may grant an aggrieved party permission to appeal from the regional director's action. Such party must request such review promptly, in writing, and state briefly the grounds relied on. Such party must also immediately serve a copy on the other parties, including the regional director. Neither the request for review by the Board, nor the Board's grant of such review, operates as a stay of the action taken by the regional director, unless specifically so ordered by the Board.

[79 FR 74476, Dec. 15, 2014]
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY QUICKLOOK CRITERIA PARAMETERS Mar. 19, 2012 Report Request ID: 969913 Report Code: AMP450

Selection Criteria Page1 User ID:FMC

State County City

Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date 04 04 003

003 0011

1005 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS Parameter Classification Parameter Method Duration 81102 SELECTED OPTIONS

EVENTS PROCESSING MERGE PDF FILES WORKFILE DELIMITER Option Type Option Value EXCLUDE REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENTS

YES

, SORT ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Order Column

PARAMETER_CODE STATE_CODE COUNTY_CODE SITE_ID POC DATES EDT_ID GLOBAL DATES

2009 Start Date End Date 2011 Tribal Code

APPLICABLE STANDARDS Standard Description PM10 24-hour 2006Mar. 19, 2012

Note: The * indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 1of 4 EXCEPTIONAL DATA TYPES EDT DESCRIPTION 0 1 2 5 NO EVENTS EVENTS EXCLUDED EVENTS INCLUDED EVENTS WITH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDEDMar. 19, 2012

Note: The * indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page2of 4 PM10 Total 0-10um STP (81102) Arizona Micrograms/cubic meter (25 C) (001)

SITE ID P

O C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH MAX CERTEDT 04-003-0011 04-003-0011 04-003-0011 04-003-0011 04-003-0011 04-003-0011 04-003-1005 04-003-1005 04-003-1005 1

1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 0053 0053 0053 0053 0053 0053 0053 0053 0053 Paul Spur Paul Spur Paul Spur Paul Spur Paul Spur Paul Spur Douglas Douglas Douglas Cochise

Cochise Cochise Cochise Cochise Cochise Cochise Cochise Cochise HOUSING AREA, PAUL SPUR HOUSING AREA, PAUL SPUR HOUSING AREA, PAUL SPUR HOUSING AREA, PAUL SPUR HOUSING AREA, PAUL SPUR HOUSING AREA, PAUL SPUR 1445-1449 15TH STREET 1445-1449 15TH STREET 1445-1449 15TH STREET 2009

2010 2011 2009 2010 2011 2009 2010 2011 126

126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 49 46 85 52 49 108 97 83 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24-HOUR VALID DAYS 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 DAY MAX >STD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 59 53 61 57 56 60 49 55 %OBS 98 97 87 100 92 92 98 80 90 1ST MAX 2ND MAX 3RD MAX 46 37 69 48 38 98 83 83 88 44 37 47 44 36 60 81 80 83 39 32 46 43 35 47 72 75 64 EST

DAYS >STD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.2 17.6 23.2 22.9 17.3 23.9 37.3 35.3* 34.5* WTD ARITH MEAN 60 59 53 61 56 56 60 49 55 NUM REQMar. 19, 2012

Note: The * indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page3of 4 81102 126 R - P Co Partisol Model 2000 Gravimetric PARAMETER METHOD

CODE COLLECTION METHOD ANALYSIS METHOD METHODS USED IN THIS REPORTMar. 19, 2012

Note: The * indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 4of 4 PQAOS USED IN THIS REPORT

PQAO AGENCY DESCRIPTION 0053 Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality
# EUR-Lex - 31996D0288 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996D0288

**96/288/EC: Commission Decision of 15 April 1996 relating to aids in Finland in the live plant and floriculture products sector **

*
Official Journal L 109 , 03/05/1996 P. 0022 - 0022 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 15 April 1996 relating to aids in Finland in the live plant and floriculture products sector (96/288/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 138 (5) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 234/68 of 27 February 1968 on the establishment of a common organization of the market in live trees and other plants, bulbs, roots and live cut flowers and ornamental foliage (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and Council Regulation (EC) No 3290/94 (2),

Whereas by Decision 95/33/EC (3), the Commission authorized Finland to grant certain aids, including aids of live plants and floriculture products within the limit of a national total of 155 hectares per annum;

Whereas the Act of Accession provides in Annex XIII for individual limits to be determined; whereas in the event of the demand for aid exceeding the limits of 155 hectares per annum it is appropriate to fix the individual limits by the application of a reduction coefficient;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Live Plants and Floriculture Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1. Aid granted by Finland for live plants and floriculture products pursuant to Decision 95/33/EC shall be subject to the individual limits laid down in paragraph 2.

2. If, for the year concerned, the total area for which demands for the aid are made exceeds 155 hectares, the aid shall be paid for the individual areas demanded reduced in proportion to the amount of the overall excessive area demanded.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Finland.

Done at Brussels, 15 April 1996.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 55, 2. 3. 1968, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 349, 31. 12. 1994, p. 105.

(3) OJ No L 43, 25. 2. 1995, p. 56.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,457,166
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,669,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          311,838
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,357,241
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,669,079
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,615
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,615)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,615)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,615)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,615)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# • FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION COMPLIANCE WITH E.O. 12866 Section 6(a)(3)(E) ofE.O. 12866 require s agencies to identi fy for the public, in a complete, c lear, and s imp le manner, those changes in a regulatory action made at the suggestion or recommendation of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), Office of Management a nd Budget. 

### Tit le of Rulemaking: Regulatory Identification Number: OIRA did not review the rul emakin g document.

OIRA reviewed the rulemaking document , but did not s uggest or recommend any changes . OIRA reviewed the rulemaking do cument, and we have documented the changes we made at OIRA ' s s uggestion or recommendation in an attachment to thi s sheet.
#### CRAWFORD CO. FARMERS MUT. FIRE INS. CO v GREEN et

Ohio Appeals, 3rd Dist, Crawford Co

Decided July 23, 1929

Messrs. R. V. Sears and Chas. Gallinger, Bucyrus, for Insurance Co.

Dean C. Talbott, Galion, for Green et.

*601HUGHES, J.

The bill of exceptions contains ample evidence to support the claim of waiver and estoppel against the three defenses made by the insurance company, if a mutual comnany is to be controlled and governed by the same rules of law and equity as would apply to old line insurance companies. And it is conceded, in oral argument, that such is the record.

It is true the provisions of the constitution and by laws of this company prohibit the waiving of the things claimed to have been waived in this case, but we are unable to formulate any reasonable rule that would distinguish a mutual company from any other company or individual. When a mutual company by its acts and conduct does things to cause another to forego certain things which otherwise result in injury and loss were not the doctrine of estoppel applied, there can be no good reason for excepting such company from the doctrine.

The doctrine was invoked against such a company by our Supreme Court, speaking through' Judge Davis, in the case of Richards vs. Louis Lipp Company, 69 OS. 359 at 364.

Entertaining this view, the judgment is affirmed.

Before Judges Hughes, Justice and Crow.