alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 91.873 Waivers from final compliance. ( a ) A U.S. air carrier or a foreign air carrier may apply for a waiver from the prohibition contained in § 91.853 of this part for its remaining Stage 2 airplanes, provided that, by July 1, 1999, at least 85 percent of the airplanes used by the carrier to provide service to or from an airport in the contiguous United States will comply with the Stage 3 noise levels.
( b ) An application for the waiver described in paragraph (a) of this section must be filed with the Secretary of Transportation no later than January 1, 1999, or, in the case of a foreign air carrier, no later than April 20, 2000. Such application must include a plan with firm orders for replacing or modifying all airplanes to comply with Stage 3 noise levels at the earliest practicable time.
( c ) To be eligible to apply for the waiver under this section, a new entrant U.S. air carrier must initiate service no later than January 1, 1999, and must comply fully with all provisions of this section.
( d ) The Secretary may grant a waiver under this section if the Secretary finds that granting such waiver is in the public interest. In making such a finding, the Secretary shall include consideration of the effect of granting such waiver on competition in the air carrier industry and the effect on small community air service, and any other information submitted by the applicant that the Secretary considers relevant.
( e ) The term of any waiver granted under this section shall be determined by the circumstances presented in the application, but in no case will the waiver permit the operation of any Stage 2 airplane covered by this subchapter in the contiguous United States after December 31, 2003.
( f ) A summary of any request for a waiver under this section will be published in the Federal Register, and public comment will be invited. Unless the secretary finds that circumstances require otherwise, the public comment period will be at least 14 days.
[Doc. No. 26433, 56 FR 48660, Sept. 25, 1991; 56 FR 51167 Oct. 10, 1991; Amdt. 91-276, 67 FR 46571, July 15, 2002]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of ETI Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul Lanham, President and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

\s\               Paul LanhamPaul LanhamPresident November 20, 2003

----
#### GRATEHOUSE v. THE STATE.

(Decided January 30, 1917.)

Appeal from Cleburne Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Hugh D. Merrill.

No counsel marked for appellant.

W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 17.9 How does the Secretary receive and respond to comments? ( a ) The Secretary follows the procedures in § 17.10 if: ( 1 ) A state office or official is designated to act as a single point of contact between a state process and all Federal agencies, and
( 2 ) That office or official transmits a state process recommendation for a program selected under § 17.6.
( b ) ( 1 ) The single point of contact is not obligated to transmit comments from state, areawide, regional or local officials and entities where there is no state process recommendation.
( 2 ) If a state process recommendation is transmitted by a single point of contact, all comments from state, areawide, regional, and local officials and entities that differ from it must also be transmitted.
( c ) If a state has not established a process, or is unable to submit a state process recommendation, state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments to the Department.
( d ) If a program or activity is not selected for a state process, state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments to the Department. In addition, if a state process recommendation for a nonselected program or activity is transmitted to the Department by the single point of contact, the Secretary follows the procedures of § 17.10 of this part.
( e ) The Secretary considers comments which do not constitute a state process recommendation submitted under these regulations and for which the Secretary is not required to apply the procedures of § 17.10 of this part, when such comments are provided by a single point of contact, or directly to the Department by a commenting party.
#### ROYAL INDEM CO et v STATE ex STANDARD SANITARY MFG CO

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21578.

Decided Apr 24, 1929

Syllabus by

MARSHALL, CJ.

CONTRACTS

(150 P7) It is within the power of the legislature to enact that at the time of the letting of a contract the state or any political subdivision of the state shall require the contractor to give a bond with sufficient sureties conditioned not .only for the proper performance of the work but also that the contractor will pay all persons such sums as may be due them for labor and materials furnished for or used in the construction for which such contract is made.

Kinkade, Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ, concur.
Exhibit
32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald
F. Schenkel, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Donald F. SchenkelDonald
      F. SchenkelChairman
      of the Board, Presidentand
      Chief Executive OfficerMay
      9, 2008
# EUR-Lex - 31998R1436 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998R1436

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1436/98 of 3 July 1998 authorising certain additives in feedingstuffs (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 191 , 07/07/1998 P. 0015 - 0034 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1436/98 of 3 July 1998 authorising certain additives in feedingstuffs (Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 93/113/EC of 14 December 1993 concerning the use and marketing of enzymes, micro-organisms and their preparations in animal nutrition (1), as last amended by Council Directive 97/40/EC (2), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas Council Directive 70/524/EEC of 23 November 1970 concerning additives in feedingstuffs (3), as last amended by Commission Directive 98/19/EC (4), lays down that new additives or new additive uses may be authorised in line with advances in scientific and technical knowledge;

Whereas Directive 93/113/EC, by derogation from Directive 70/524/EEC, authorises Member States to permit provisionally the use and marketing of enzymes, micro-organisms and their preparations in animal nutrition;

Whereas examination of the dossiers, submitted by the Member States in accordance with Article 3 of Directive 93/113/EC, indicates that a certain number of substances in the groups of enzymes and micro-organisms can be provisionally authorised;

Whereas the Scientific Committee for animal nutrition has delivered a favourable opinion with regard to the harmlessness of these substances;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Feedingstuffs,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The substances belonging to the group 'enzymes` and listed in Annex I to this Regulation may be authorised as additives in animal nutrition under the conditions laid down in that Annex.

Article 2

The substances belonging to the group 'micro-organisms` and listed in Annex II to this Regulation may be authorised as additives in animal nutrition under the conditions laid down in that Annex.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 1999.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 July 1998.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 334, 31. 12. 1993, p. 17.

(2) OJ L 180, 9. 7. 1997, p. 21.

(3) OJ L 270, 14. 12. 1970, p. 1.

(4) OJ L 96, 28. 3. 1998, p. 39.

ANNEX I

>TABLE>

ANNEX II

>TABLE>
#### § 291.30 General.

The following exemptions, except as otherwise specifically noted, apply only to cargo operations in interstate air transportation. They do not relieve a carrier from obligations derived from other transportation.

[ER-1080, 43 FR 53635, Nov. 16, 1978, as amended at 60 FR 43526, Aug. 22, 1995]
#### ZIMMERMAN v COOK et

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist, Erie Co

No. 307.

Decided October 21, 1929

Messrs. J. P. Hertlein and H. L. Peeke, Sandusky, for Zimmerman.

Messrs. Henry Hart and King, Ramsey & Flynn, Sandusky, for Cook et.

*709LLOYD, J.

We have carefully examined the record presented to us and are unable to find therein any evidence tending to show that the decedent was mentally unsound and incapable of making a will at the time of the execution by her of the one here in question, or that she was under any restraint or that undue influence induced its making. Influence to be undue, must be wrongful. To avoid a will, it must be of such nature as to deprive the testator of the exercise of his own judgment and volition. The. conversation above quoted of the decedent with her son shows that, as bad as was her physical condition, she understood what she had done and recognized the validity of the will which she had made, but had changed her mind and desired its revocation. It may be unfortunate and a matter of regret that she was not afforded this opportunity, but as carefully as the members of this court have examined the record of the evidence, we cannot find any warrant or justification in law for disturbing the judgment.

Williams and Richards, JJ, concur.
No. 17,126.

#### Dallin *v.*McIvor.

*Appeal.*— Jurisdiction.—Action *for Belief from Judgment.*— A proceeding to be relieved from a judgment falls within the jurisdiction to which the qriginal action belongs, and the appeal from such proceeding follows the jurisdiction of such original action.

From the St. Joseph Circuit Court.

*W. A. Funic,*for appellant.

*A. Anderson,*for appellee.

Hackney, J.

— This was an action by the appellant against the appellee, under section 399, R. S. 1894, tobe relieved from a judgment for $2,254.25 taken by default. The action, the judgment in which is in question, was by the appellee against the appellant and the Indiana and Lake Michigan Railway Company, to recover for work and labor performed, material furnished and moneys loaned in and about the construction of the railway *387of said company, and for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien upon said railway. In that action there was a dismissal as to the railway company, and a personal judgment for the amount stated as against the appellant.

Filed Jan. 10, 1895.

An appeal from the original judgment would have been within the jurisdiction of the Appellate Court, considering the amount involved, or, since the act of March 4, 1893 (Act 1893, p. 356), if the enforcement of said lien had continued a part of the proceedings.

The proceeding to be relieved from a judgment falls within the jurisdiction to which the original action belonged, and the appeal from such proceeding follows the jurisdiction of such original action. *Parker*v. *Indianapolis Nat’l Bank,*126 Ind. 595; *Ex parte Kiley &*Slatterly, 135 Ind. 225.

The appeal herein is, therefore, ordered to be certified to the Appellate Court.
OMI Corporation 
Exhibit 99.2

Form 10-K

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OMI Corporation
    (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002
    as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
    I, Kathleen C. Haines, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
    Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
    adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
    the best of my knowledge:

3) The Report
    fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and

4) The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and result of operations of the Company.

|Date:March
        28, 2003 | By: | /s/ KATHLEENC.
        HAINES
|--------------------------- | --- | -----------------------------
|                            |     |                              
|                            |     |                              
|                            |     |                              
|                            |     |                              
|                            |     |                              

A signed original of this written statement
      required by Section 906 has been provided to OMI Corporation and will be
      retained by OMI Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its Staff upon request.





---
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer  Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)  of the Exchange Act

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of Advanstar Communications Inc. (the "Company") for the
year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David W. Montgomery, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|By: |  | /s/DAVID W. MONTGOMERYDavid W. Montgomery
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

Date:
June 28, 2005

---



QuickLinks
EX-4.2








Exhibit 4.2








	Incorporated in the Cayman Islands
This is to certify that
is / are ftf. registerafl shareholders nf: No. of Shares
Type of Share
Par Value US$
Date of Record
ertificate Number
% Paid
The above shares are subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company
and transferrable in accordance therewith.
Given under the Common
of the Company
Director
Director / Secretary
§ 382.41 What flight-related information must carriers provide to qualified individuals with a disability? As a carrier, you must provide the following information, on request, to qualified individuals with a disability or persons making inquiries on their behalf concerning the accessibility of the aircraft expected to make a particular flight. The information you provide must be specific to the aircraft you expect to use for the flight unless it is unfeasible for you to do so (*e.g.,* because unpredictable circumstances such as weather or a mechanical problem require substitution of another aircraft that could affect the location or availability of an accommodation). The required information is: ( a ) The specific location of seats, if any, with movable armrests (*i.e.,* by row and seat number);
( b ) The specific location of seats (*i.e.,* by row and seat number) that the carrier, consistent with this part, does not make available to passengers with a disability (*e.g.,* exit row seats);
( c ) Any aircraft-related, service-related or other limitations on the ability to accommodate passengers with a disability, including limitations on the availability of level-entry boarding to the aircraft at any airport involved with the flight. You must provide this information to any passenger who states that he or she uses a wheelchair for boarding, even if the passenger does not explicitly request the information.
( d ) Any limitations on the availability of storage facilities, in the cabin or in the cargo bay, for mobility aids or other assistive devices commonly used by passengers with a disability, including storage in the cabin of a passenger's wheelchair as provided in §§ 382.67 and 382.123 of this part;
( e ) Information regarding accessibility of lavatories (*see* § 382.63(h)); and
( f ) The types of services to passengers with a disability that are or are not available on the flight.
[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2004-19482, 73 FR 27665, May 13, 2008, as amended by Docket No. DOT-OST-2021-0137, 88 FR 50034, Aug. 1, 2023]
**Exhibit 14(a)**

 

**Consentof PricewaterhouseCoopers**

 

Independent Auditors’ Consent

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in Rhodia’s Registration Statement on Form S-8(Registration No. 333-12200) and Rhodia’s Registration Statement on FormF-4 (Registration No. 333-107379) of our report dated February 25, 2004relating to Rhodia’s financial statements that appear in Rhodia’s Annual Reporton Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 23,2004.

 

 
| Paris,  France           |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
| March 23,  2004     |
|                     |
|                     |
| *PricewaterhouseCoopers* |

 

----
#### § 1604.5 Job opportunities advertising.

It is a violation of title VII for a help-wanted advertisement to indicate a preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination based on sex unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for the particular job involved. The placement of an advertisement in columns classified by publishers on the basis of sex, such as columns headed “Male” or “Female,” will be considered an expression of a preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination based on sex.
§ 293.11 Required statement. Each governing rules tariff shall include the following statements: ( a ) “Rules herein containing general conditions of carriage are not part of the official U.S. D.O.T. tariff.”
( b ) “The rules and provisions contained herein apply only to the passenger fares and charges that the U.S. Department of Transportation requires to be filed as tariffs.”
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

165° 30° |
165°00

66° TO

RECON A

66°30"
GAMMAS

|

1670
‘Tioo
1000

— 900

84 K
é
$ |
|
']
p |
|
9 ,
|
% |
£
|
i
| [T | GAMMAS
| 8 g 8 8 T J | TT TS
© 2 § $ § 3 8 ggg,
n> 2 8 © 8 ¢
= 2 sg
84
8
° ° so)
8/8 <
I lL
66°15’ — : . : : \ |
165° 30 08°30 nu 165°00"
66°45" 45! y
t
HORIZONTAL SCALE --_________-~_1:63,360 let
VERTICAL SCALE ON RECONNAISSANCE PROFILES AS SHOWN sorts’ aod O R G - Y ‘ E
RECONNAISSANCE ALTITUDE _______ 500' AMT ine Al N | C A [_ S L V/ E Y | N S = WA R D E N | \
FLIGHT LINE... p-8 2 oo o © (gat t-eserPentine HOT SPRINGS )
° Nees | 4 AREA
MAGNETICS BASED ON ARBITRARY DATUM - \ KOUGAROK; be:
\ AREA | t fe) | 2 3 4 MILES
REGIONAL MAGNETIC GRADIENT NOT REMOVED - = — E J E =i tT =)
ESTIMATED TOTAL INTENSITY OF FIELD : 55,000 Pe dal 163° TM 1969
MEAN INCLINATION! + 75% * INDEX MAP SHOWING DETAILED LOCATION OF
~ 3 AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS IN SEWARD \
a /-- -=- PENINSULA, 1968. COVERAGE CONFINED TO
sway ear as’ AREAS OUTLINED BY DASHED LINES PLUS
\ NOME 2 7 LETTERED PROFILES. pa 4
I) Sas
uo ~ >
940g! NOME Bad AREA Kiba’
igge3o" 910,11 168°00! 163° 30° 7 ee
" 2 ‘i ” @?) < =
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

                  KMART CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
                EXHIBIT 23-CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration Statement Nos. 33-54879, 33-48490,
33-48673, 33-52797, and 33-52799) of Kmart Corporation of our report dated
March 3, 1998 appearing on page 22 of the Annual Report to Shareholders which
is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended January 28, 1998.

/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
Price Waterhouse LLP
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan
April 13, 1998
§ 1614.301 Relationship to negotiated grievance procedure. ( a ) When a person is employed by an agency subject to 5 U.S.C. 7121(d) and is covered by a collective bargaining agreement that permits allegations of discrimination to be raised in a negotiated grievance procedure, a person wishing to file a complaint or a grievance on a matter of alleged employment discrimination must elect to raise the matter under either part 1614 or the negotiated grievance procedure, but not both. An election to proceed under this part is indicated only by the filing of a written complaint; use of the pre-complaint process as described in § 1614.105 does not constitute an election for purposes of this section. An aggrieved employee who files a complaint under this part may not thereafter file a grievance on the same matter. An election to proceed under a negotiated grievance procedure is indicated by the filing of a timely written grievance. An aggrieved employee who files a grievance with an agency whose negotiated agreement permits the acceptance of grievances which allege discrimination may not thereafter file a complaint on the same matter under this part 1614 irrespective of whether the agency has informed the individual of the need to elect or of whether the grievance has raised an issue of discrimination. Any such complaint filed after a grievance has been filed on the same matter shall be dismissed without prejudice to the complainant's right to proceed through the negotiated grievance procedure including the right to appeal to the Commission from a final decision as provided in subpart D of this part. The dismissal of such a complaint shall advise the complainant of the obligation to raise discrimination in the grievance process and of the right to appeal the final grievance decision to the Commission.
( b ) When a person is not covered by a collective bargaining agreement that permits allegations of discrimination to be raised in a negotiated grievance procedure, allegations of discrimination shall be processed as complaints under this part.
( c ) When a person is employed by an agency not subject to 5 U.S.C 7121(d) and is covered by a negotiated grievance procedure, allegations of discrimination shall be processed as complaints under this part, except that the time limits for processing the complaint contained in § 1614.106 and for appeal to the Commission contained in § 1614.402 may be held in abeyance during processing of a grievance covering the same matter as the complaint if the agency notifies the complainant in writing that the complaint will be held in abeyance pursuant to this section.