alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 93 (Friday, May 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11966]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CA-160-1220-00]


Extension of Nomination Period for Central California Resource 
Advisory Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Resource Advisory Council Call for Nominations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is to extend the deadline for 
receiving nominations for membership on the Bureau of Land Management 
(BLM) Central California Resource Advisory Councils (RAC). The RAC 
provides advice and recommendations to BLM on land use planning and 
management of the public lands. Public nominations will be considered 
until May 21, 2000. The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) 
directs the Secretary of the Interior to involve the public in planning 
and issues related to management of lands administered by BLM. Section 
309 of FLPMA directs the Secretary to select citizen-based advisory 
councils that are established and authorized consistent with the 
requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). As required 
by the FACA, members appointed to the RAC must be balanced and 
representative of the various interests concerned with the management 
of the public lands. These include three categories:
    Category One--Holders of federal grazing permits and 
representatives of energy and mineral development, timber industry, 
transportation or rights-of-way, off-highway vehicle use, and 
commercial recreation;
    Category Two--Representatives of nationally or regionally 
recognized environmental organizations, archaeological and historic 
interests, dispersed recreation, and wild horse and burro groups;
    Category Three--Holders of State, county or local elected office, 
employees of a State agency responsible for management of natural 
resources, academicians involved in natural sciences, representatives 
of Indian tribes, and the public-at-large.
    Individuals may nominate themselves or others. Nominees must be 
residents of the State of California. Nominees will be evaluated based 
on their education, training, and experience and their knowledge of the 
geographical area of the RAC. Nominees should have demonstrated a 
commitment to collaborative resource decision making. All nominations 
must be accompanied by letters of reference from represented interests 
or organizations, a completed background information nomination form, 
as well as any other information that speaks to the nominee's 
qualifications.
    There are four vacancies on the Central California RAC; one in 
Category One, one in Category Two, and two in Category Three. 
Nominations should be sent to: Larry Mercer, Bakersfield Field Office, 
BLM, 3801 Pegasus Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93308, telephone: 661-391-
6000.

    Dated: May 2, 2000.
Ron Fellows,
Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-11966 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-M
§ 25.1103 Induction system ducts and air duct systems. ( a ) Each induction system duct upstream of the first stage of the engine supercharger and of the auxiliary power unit compressor must have a drain to prevent the hazardous accumulation of fuel and moisture in the ground attitude. No drain may discharge where it might cause a fire hazard.
( b ) Each induction system duct must be— ( 1 ) Strong enough to prevent induction system failures resulting from normal backfire conditions; and
( 2 ) Fire-resistant if it is in any fire zone for which a fire-extinguishing system is required, except that ducts for auxiliary power units must be fireproof within the auxiliary power unit fire zone.
( c ) Each duct connected to components between which relative motion could exist must have means for flexibility.
( d ) For turbine engine and auxiliary power unit bleed air duct systems, no hazard may result if a duct failure occurs at any point between the air duct source and the airplane unit served by the air.
( e ) Each auxiliary power unit induction system duct must be fireproof for a sufficient distance upstream of the auxiliary power unit compartment to prevent hot gas reverse flow from burning through auxiliary power unit ducts and entering any other compartment or area of the airplane in which a hazard would be created resulting from the entry of hot gases. The materials used to form the remainder of the induction system duct and plenum chamber of the auxiliary power unit must be capable of resisting the maximum heat conditions likely to occur.
( f ) Each auxiliary power unit induction system duct must be constructed of materials that will not absorb or trap hazardous quantities of flammable fluids that could be ignited in the event of a surge or reverse flow condition.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-46, 43 FR 50597, Oct. 30, 1978]
#### § 1205.1 Handling of disputes.

Section 2, Eighth, of the Railway Labor Act provides that every carrier shall notify its employees by printed notices in such form and posted at such times and places as shall be specified by order of the Mediation Board and requires that all disputes between a carrier and its employees will be handled in accordance with the requirements of the act. In such notices there must be printed verbatim, in large type, the third, fourth, and fifth paragraphs of said section 2, Eighth, of the Railway Labor Act.
§ 1471.800 What are the causes for debarment? We may debar a person for— ( a ) Conviction of or civil judgment for— ( 1 ) Commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public or private agreement or transaction;
( 2 ) Violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes, including those proscribing price fixing between competitors, allocation of customers between competitors, and bid rigging;
( 3 ) Commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, receiving stolen property, making false claims, or obstruction of justice; or
( 4 ) Commission of any other offense indicating a lack of business integrity or business honesty that seriously and directly affects your present responsibility;
( b ) Violation of the terms of a public agreement or transaction so serious as to affect the integrity of an agency program, such as— ( 1 ) A willful failure to perform in accordance with the terms of one or more public agreements or transactions;
( 2 ) A history of failure to perform or of unsatisfactory performance of one or more public agreements or transactions; or
( 3 ) A willful violation of a statutory or regulatory provision or requirement applicable to a public agreement or transaction;
( c ) Any of the following causes: ( 1 ) A nonprocurement debarment by any Federal agency taken before October 1, 1988, or a procurement debarment by any Federal agency taken pursuant to 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, before August 25, 1995;
( 2 ) Knowingly doing business with an ineligible person, except as permitted under § 1471.120;
( 3 ) Failure to pay a single substantial debt, or a number of outstanding debts (including disallowed costs and overpayments, but not including sums owed the Federal Government under the Internal Revenue Code) owed to any Federal agency or instrumentality, provided the debt is uncontested by the debtor or, if contested, provided that the debtor's legal and administrative remedies have been exhausted;
( 4 ) Violation of a material provision of a voluntary exclusion agreement entered into under § 1471.640 or of any settlement of a debarment or suspension action; or
( 5 ) Violation of the provisions of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. 701); or
( d ) Any other cause of so serious or compelling a nature that it affects your present responsibility.
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2012 (the “Report”), I, Gary Pokrassa, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:



(1)      The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)      The information contained
in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|September 13, 2012 | /s/Gary Pokrassa       
|------------------ | -----------------------
|                   | Gary Pokrassa,         
|                   | Chief Financial Officer
Author: ICF Consulting, Inc; Abt Associates, Inc.

Source: Integrated Planning Model (IPM)

Date Created: 6/18/2008

Date Modified: 3/30/2011

Purpose: Contains NERC region level electricity, coal, and natural gas prices for Option 2: IM Everywhere and EM

for Facilities with DIF>125MGD policy IPM run.

File Contents:

Worksheet Contents

ToAbt NERC region level electricity, coal, and natural gas prices for Option 2: IM Everywhere and EM for

Facilities with DIF>125MGD policy run IPM run.

Input Files:

External data used in calculations/analysis:

None.

FileInfo 1 of 2
NERC Level Prices - EPA302ABT_PC_2b

Capacity Price ($/kW-yr) Energy Price (mills/kWh)

NERC Region 2015 2020 2025 2028 2015 2020 2025 2028

FRCC 9.85 31.16 38.02 59.18 61.84 57.81 52.28 53.09

MRO 2.52 54.40 65.11 77.64 34.98 39.55 39.06 40.26

NPCC 7.32 43.06 53.69 77.92 61.04 61.69 57.48 60.05

RFC 4.45 64.48 61.56 75.20 36.41 41.86 40.56 41.66

SERC 14.06 42.32 58.96 72.91 41.58 44.55 42.14 43.21

SPP 12.39 24.15 36.86 45.23 42.20 42.51 40.29 41.65

TRE 16.70 33.11 42.20 54.28 53.27 52.31 48.06 50.01

WECC 4.71 23.75 47.17 62.18 48.99 49.09 44.30 45.50

Natural Gas Price ($/MMBtu) Coal Price ($/MMBtu)

NERC Region 2015 2020 2025 2028 2015 2020 2025 2028

FRCC 6.33 6.46 6.07 6.35 2.27 2.24 2.03 2.11

MRO 5.88 5.80 5.57 5.88 1.27 1.25 1.25 1.27

NPCC 6.75 6.89 6.52 6.82 2.05 2.03 2.05 2.12

RFC 6.47 6.49 6.13 6.45 1.53 1.53 1.55 1.62

SERC 6.02 6.00 5.82 6.11 1.74 1.72 1.70 1.73

SPP 5.70 5.52 5.38 5.68 1.18 1.15 1.18 1.20

TRE 5.71 5.64 5.47 5.79 1.60 1.53 1.56 1.64

WECC 5.93 6.11 5.70 6.01 1.30 1.30 1.35 1.38

ToAbt 2 of 2
§ 5.71 Safety performance monitoring and measurement. ( a ) Any person required to have an SMS under this part must develop and maintain processes and systems to acquire data with respect to its operations, products, and services to monitor the safety performance of the organization. These processes and systems must include, at a minimum, the following: ( 1 ) Monitoring of operational processes.
( 2 ) Monitoring of the operational environment to detect changes.
( 3 ) Auditing of operational processes and systems.
( 4 ) Evaluations of the SMS and operational processes and systems.
( 5 ) Investigations of incidents and accidents.
( 6 ) Investigations of reports regarding potential non-compliance with regulatory standards or other safety risk controls established by the person through the safety risk management process established in subpart C of this part.
( 7 ) A confidential employee reporting system in which employees can report hazards, issues, concerns, occurrences, incidents, as well as propose solutions and safety improvements, without concern of reprisal for reporting.
( 8 ) Investigations of hazard notifications that have been received from external sources.
( b ) Any person required to have an SMS under this part must develop and maintain processes that analyze the data acquired through the processes and systems identified under paragraph (a) of this section and any other relevant data with respect to its operations, products, and services.
( c ) Any person that holds both a type certificate and a production certificate issued under part 21 of this chapter for the same product must submit a summary of the confidential employee reports received under paragraph (a)(7) of this section to the Administrator once every 6 months.
[Doc. No. FAA-2021-0419, Amdt. 5-2, 89 FR 33107, Apr. 26, 2024]
#### J. C. Hogans, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. E. A. Demps, *Defendant in Error.*

1. Where testimony is rejected that seeks to establish a fact that is afterwards found to be a truly existent fact by the referee the error in such rejection if any, is harmless.

*2.*Where asserted error in rejecting - testimony is not clearly made to appear the presumption that the court ruled correctly must prevail.

*1783. It is not error to reject testimony as to the breach of an agreement when there is no evidence of the existence of such agreement.

Writ of error to the Circuit' Court for Suwannee County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*L. E.*Roberson, for Plaintiff in Error;

*McGollum &*Harrell, for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

— Hogans brought ejectment against Demps. A former judgment for the plaintiff was reversed because a present right of possession in the plaintiff was not shown. Demps v. Hogan, 57 Fla. 60, 48 South. Rep. 998. A second trial was before a referee and resulted in a judgment for defendant, to which plaintiff took writ of error. The transcript does not purport to contain all the evidence adduced at the trial, therefore the grounds of the motion for new trial’ that the finding is contrary to the evidence cannot be considered here. There is nothing to indicate that the finding and judgment are contrary to law.

At the trial the plaintiff offered1 testimony that he authorized his agent to put the defendant in possession of the land. The questions asked are not in the transcript. If the questions asked are not objectionable in form, the error if any in excluding-the testimony sought to be adduced, is rendered immaterial in view of the finding of the referee that the defendant is in possession of the lands by authority of the plaintiff.

*179An offer of testimony that plaintiff was in possession of the lands claiming them as his own before the deefndant went into possession, was objected to on the grounds that it called for an opinion of the witness and that facts Avere not asked for. The objection Avas sustained. As the particular questions asked are not before us, it must be assumed that the referee excluded them because they were subject to the specific objection made to them that they called for opinion and not facts.

Testimony offered to prove that the defendant had not paid or offered to pay the plaintiff the purchase price of the land, does not appear to have been improperly excluded since no contract or promise to pay appears. All the evidence not being in the transcript to sIioav reversible errors if any, the rulings complained of are not shown to be erroneous.. See Falk v. Kimmerle, 57 Fla. 70, 49 South. Rep. 504. In the case of Goodwin v. Markwell, 37 Fla. 464, 19 South. Rep. 885, the offer was to prove the existence of a contract and a compliance with it.

No reversible error being made to appear the judgment is affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Taylor, Shackleford, Cockrell and Hocker, J. J., concur.
#### STATE ex RAMEY et v DAVIS et

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21405.

Decided Feb 6, 1929

Syllabus by

ROBINSON, J.

MUNICIPALITIES

(360 C2) The sovereignty of the state in respect to its courts extends over all the state, including municipalities, whether gpverned by charter or general laws.

STATE

(540 P2) None of the various provisions of Article XVIII of the Constitution of Ohio are effective to abridge the sovereignity of the state over municipalities in respect to its courts.

COURTS

(180 C3) The legislature has the exclusive power to create courts inferior to the Courts of Appeals.

The power to create a court carries with it the power to define its jurisdiction and to provide for its maintenance.

*110(180 M5) The imposing of the burden of housing the courts created for the jurisdiction of a designated political subdivision upon such subdivision, is in accordance with the practice of the state from its inception, is an equitable distribution of the burdens of state government among the political subdivisions of the state and violates no provision of the Constitution of the state.

Where the legislature confers upon a court certain minor extraterritorial jurisdiction and the state contributes substantially toward the maintenance of such court, the requirement that the political subdivisions, of the jurisdiction of the court, house such court does not amount to an imposition upon such political subdivision of a burden that ought to be, borne by the state at large, where the expense of such extraterritorial jurisdiction is not out of proportion to such contribution.

Marshall, C J, Kinkade, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ, concur.
# EUR-Lex - 31995R2627 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995R2627

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2627/95 of 10 November 1995 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2273/93 determining the intervention centres for cereals **

*
Official Journal L 269 , 11/11/1995 P. 0007 - 0007 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2627/95 of 10 November 1995 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2273/93 determining the intervention centres for cereals

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organization of the market in cereals (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1863/95 (2), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas the intervention centres are listed in the Annex to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2273/93 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1307/95 (4); whereas certain Member States have requested the amendment of that Annex; whereas those requests should be granted;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 2273/93 is hereby amended as follows:

1. Under 'BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND`:

- under 'Land Baden-Wuerttemberg`, Ilshofen is deleted for common wheat, barley and rye;

- under 'Land Sachsen-Anhalt`, Coswig is deleted for rye, Rosslau is added as an intervention centre for common wheat and rye and Vahldorf is added as an intervention centre for common wheat, barley and rye;

- under 'Land Nordrhein-Westfalen`, Siegen is deleted for common wheat;

- under 'Land Bayern`, Straubing is deleted for rye and Neustadt/Saale is added as an intervention centre for rye.

2. Under 'OESTERREICH`:

- 'Absdorf` becomes 'Absdorf-Hippersdorf`;

- Geinberg is deleted for barley but becomes an intervention centre for common wheat;

- 'Wien-Albern` becomes 'Wien`;

- 'Dobermannsdorf` becomes 'Palterndorf-Dobermannsdorf`;

- 'Untersiebenbrunn` becomes 'Siebenbrunn-Leopoldsdorf`.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 November 1995.

For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission
#### § 39.21 Where can I get information about FAA-approved alternative methods of compliance?

Each airworthiness directive identifies the office responsible for approving alternative methods of compliance. That office can provide information about alternatives it has already approved.
HART SALES Corp 

Mr. Dennis DeVeany 

Chief EAS & Domestic Analysis 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington DC 20590 

. :; 

! i Monday, May 20, 2013 / 

Subject: Proposal to provide ESA air service to Adak, AK Docket DOT-OST-2000-8556 

Mr. DeVany, 

I am writing you to outline our position with regards to Alaska Airlines and the essential services 

agreement for Adak, Alaska. 

Our company operates a division within the city of Adak called Adak-Fresh. We are a purchaser 

and primary processor of Alaskan ground fish. Over the past six weeks we have shipped 

approximately 40,000 lbs of freight into Adak and just over 35,000 lbs of fresh fish out of Adak. 

Moving forward we estimate shipping in excess of 300,000 lbs of fresh fish prior to November 

2013. 

Alaska Airlines is essential to the success of Adak-Fresh. Jet service twice weekly allows us to 

move our perishable product to the market in a timely fashion. The Alaska Airlines staff have 

accommodated our needs for this season by confirming a 737 Combi service starting next month. 

Respectfully I urge The Department of Transport to support Alaska Airlines with the Essential Air 

Services to Adak island. Simply put, without the Jet services of Alaska Airlines to the lower 48 

markets I will have to cease our operation on Adak island. 

Should you have any questions or concerns I would be pleased to address them promptly. 

President 

HART SALES Corp. 

HART SALES Corp. Victoria British Columbia 

tel250-388-7639 fx 250-388-7649 

vv'WW .hartsc. com
#### § 460.49 Space flight participant waiver of claims against U.S. Government.

Each space flight participant must execute a reciprocal waiver of claims with the Federal Aviation Administration of the Department of Transportation in accordance with the requirements of part 440 of this chapter.
§ 93.307 Minimum flight altitudes. Except in an emergency, or if otherwise necessary for safety of flight, or unless otherwise authorized by the responsible Flight Standards Office for a purpose listed in § 93.309, no person may operate an aircraft in the Special Flight Rules Area at an altitude lower than the following: ( a ) *Minimum sector altitudes* — ( 1 ) *Commercial air tours* — ( i ) *Marble Canyon Sector.* Lees Ferry to Boundary Ridge: 6,000 feet MSL.
( ii ) *Supai Sector.* Boundary Ridge to Supai Point: 7,500 feet MSL.
( iii ) *Diamond Creek Sector.* Supai Point to Diamond Creek: 6,500 feet MSL.
( iv ) *Pearce Ferry Sector.* Diamond Creek to the Grand Wash Cliffs: 5,000 feet MSL.
( 2 ) *Transient and general aviation operations* — ( i ) *Marble Canyon Sector.* Lees Ferry to Boundary Ridge: 8,000 feet MSL.
( ii ) *Supai Sector.* Boundary Ridge to Supai Point: 10,000 feet MSL.
( iii ) *Diamond Creek Sector.* Supai Point to Diamond Creek: 9,000 feet MSL.
( iv ) *Pearce Ferry Sector.* Diamond Creek to the Grand Wash Cliffs: 8,000 feet MSL.
( b ) *Minimum corridor altitudes* — ( 1 ) *Commercial air tours* — ( i ) *Zuni Point Corridors.* 7,500 feet MSL.
( ii ) *Dragon Corridor.* 7,500 feet MSL.
( 2 ) *Transient and general aviation operations* — ( i ) *Zuni Point Corridor.* 10,500 feet MSL.
( ii ) *Dragon Corridor.* 10,500 feet MSL.
( iii ) *Tuckup Corridor.* 10,500 feet MSL.
( iv ) Fossil Canyon Corridor. 10,500 feet
[Doc. No. 28537, 61 FR 69330, Dec. 31, 1996, as amended by Amdt. 93-80, 65 FR 17742, 17743, Apr. 4, 2000; Amdt. 93-102, 83 FR 48212, Sept. 24, 2018]