alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 24 - 00035 - CV LAURIE PERRY AKA LAURIE BLACK , A PPELLANT V. BILLD EXCHANGE, LLC , APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court at Law No . 2

Denton County, Texas Trial Court No . CV

- 2022 - 02690 , Honorable Robert C. Ramirez , Presiding 

### May 29 , 2024 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. Appellant, Laurie Perry aka Laurie Black, proceeding pro se, appeals from the trial court’s Summary Judgment. 1 Perry’s brief was originally due April 1 5 , 2024, but was not filed. By letter of April 22, 20 2 4, we notified Perry that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution, without further notice, if a brief was not received by May 2. On May 7 , 2024, Perry attempted to file a document via eFile requesting a ninety - day

1 Originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 73.001.2

extension to file a brief. This document was rejected by the Clerk of the Court, however, because it was not served on the parties , did not include a certificate of conference , and was not accompanied by a filing fee as required by the appellate rules. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5, 9.5, 10.1(a)(5). Pe rry was instructed to file a corrected motion for extension in compliance with the appellate rules by May 9 , 2024. She has not file d a corrected motion or had any further communication with this Court to date. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for wan t of prosecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Per Curiam
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                 EMERGING GAMMA CORPORATION
                                                 --------------------------

                                                 STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                                 ------------------------

                                         FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002 AND 2001
                                        --------------------------------------------


                                                                                    2002           2001
                                                                                   -------        -------
<S>                                                                                <C>            <C>

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
   Net loss                                                                        $ (6,617)      $   (352)
     Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
       operating activities-
         Increase (decrease) in accounts payable                                       ---          (1,200)

           Net cash used in operating activities                                     (6,617)        (1,552)
                                                                                   --------       --------

DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS                                                (6,617)        (1,552)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - beginning of year                                       300,260        301,812
                                                                                   --------       --------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - end of year                                            $293,643       $300,260
                                                                                   ========       ========


                      The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
</TABLE>

                                                    F-6
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****National assessment of oil andgas project: geologic assessment of undiscovered gas hydrate resources of theNorth Slope, Alaska**
 
Read Me | ExecutiveSummary | Assessment
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.121:69-CC
Item Number:0621-K (online)
CGP systemNumber:000931630
 
January 23, 2018
§ 417.129 Safety at end of launch. A launch operator must ensure for any proposed launch that for all launch vehicle stages or components that reach Earth orbit— ( a ) There is no unplanned physical contact between the vehicle or any of its components and the payload after payload separation;
( b ) Debris generation does not result from the conversion of energy sources into energy that fragments the vehicle or its components. Energy sources include chemical, pressure, and kinetic energy; and
( c ) Stored energy is removed by depleting residual fuel and leaving all fuel line valves open, venting any pressurized system, leaving all batteries in a permanent discharge state, and removing any remaining source of stored energy.
EXHIBIT 12.1


                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Felipe Menendez Ross, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Ultrapetrol (Bahamas)
     Limited;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)): for the registrant and
     have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
          covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: May 1, 2006

/s/ Felipe Menendez Ross
--------------------------------
Felipe Menendez Ross

Director, Chief Executive
Officer, and President
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Irwin Gross, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Amalgamated
Technologies, Inc.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made know to me by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
         quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     (c) Presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         controls; and

     6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August 20, 2004

/s/ Irwin Gross
-------------------
Irwin Gross
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
#### § 389.10 Applicability of subpart.

This subpart describes certain services and resources made available by the Department and prescribes the fees and charges for those services and resources.
#### SIMAITIS et v KISS et

Ohio Appeals; 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

*No*9514.

Decided Nov. 26, 1928

John L. Mihelich, Esq., Cleveland, for Simaitis.

Messers. Neiger & Greenwald, Cleveland, for Kiss.

VICKERY, J.

Now it is argued that Greenfield is an innocent party. One cannot read this record and come to that conclusion. He did not know of any agreement. He did not know who owned the property. He was introduced to Kiss and yet upon that alone he loaned $4700 and he says he paid it all out, but as already stated it does not appear where the rest of the money went to; at least the plaintiff did not get it.

It is argued that between two innocent people who must suffer, the one who made it possible for the wrong to be committed must be held. That is a very equitable doctrine. Now applying that doctrine to this case, it is manifest in this case that the plaintiff knew nothing of what he was doing, was not capable of understanding the nature of it and he was in the hands of a party of people who seemed to be working together, including the man who held the $4700 mortgage and the result was as stated. Plaintiff lost that much money. Now so far as he was concerned, he supposed that he was taking, his $2000 mortgage subject to a $1500 mortgage, nor did he know that the $2000 payment had come from this $4700 fund. Now under those circumstances can it be conceivable that the owner of the land loses his right to a vendor’s lien? We do not think that he waived his lien as against this mortgage by taking the mortgage for $2000 upon this property. The whole matter seems to have been maneuvered in the office of Munson and we think under the circumstances in this case the plaintiff is entitled to have a decree in his favor for a vendor’s lien. That vendor’s lien is ahead *425of everything except the $1500 mortgage on this property. I think this would be an equitable adjustment of this matter and that it would be in accordance with the understanding and agreement, and we think there should be a decree entered in favor of the plaintiff, order see journal.

Sullivan, PJ, and Levine, J, concur.'
#### Pell *vs.*Lovett.

utica,

July, 1838.

Counts in covenant and assumpsit cannot be joined in the same action.

A misjoinder of counts is fatal on a writ of error, as well as on demurrer.

Error from the New-York C. P. Lovett sued Pell in the court below- The first count of the declaration was in *covenant,*to yvhich were added several counts in *assumpsit.*Plea to the first count, *non est factum,*and to the subsequent counts, *non assumpsit.*There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff on both issues, and Pell now brings error.

*J. Law,*for plaintiff in error-

*P.jA. Cowdrey,*for defendant in error.

*547
      *By the Court,*

Bronson, J.

It has been often said that . . .. counts in *covenant*cannot be joined with counts in *assumpsit;*1 Chit. Pl. 199; Tidd Pr. 10, 11; and if there be no adjudged case upon the precise point, it is because no one has ever before ventured on the experiment of declaring in this manner. That a misjoinder of counts is fatal on a writ of error as well as on demurrer, has often been decided in England, and was adjudged by this court in *Cooper*v. *Bissell,*16 Johns. R. 146. Although the present statute of amendments, 2 R. S. 424, is in some respects broader than the former one, it has not cured this objection,

Judgment reversed.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 472 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 472

    To amend title 49, United States Code, to ensure that revenues 
 collected from passengers as aviation security fees are used to help 
    finance the costs of aviation security screening by repealing a 
   requirement that a portion of such fees be credited as offsetting 
      receipts and deposited in the general fund of the Treasury.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2019

 Mr. Markey (for himself and Mr. Blumenthal) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 49, United States Code, to ensure that revenues 
 collected from passengers as aviation security fees are used to help 
    finance the costs of aviation security screening by repealing a 
   requirement that a portion of such fees be credited as offsetting 
      receipts and deposited in the general fund of the Treasury.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Funding for Aviation Screeners and 
Threat Elimination Restoration Act'' or the ``FASTER Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT REGARDING CREDITING AND DEPOSIT OF A 
              PORTION OF AVIATION SECURITY FEES.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 44940 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (c), by striking paragraph (3);
            (2) in subsection (f)--
                    (A) by striking the heading and inserting ``Deposit 
                and Availability of Fee.--'';
                    (B) by striking paragraph (1);
                    (C) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as 
                paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively; and
                    (D) by amending paragraph (1), as so redesignated, 
                to read as follows:
            ``(1) shall be deposited into a separate account in the 
        Treasury, which shall be available to the Administrator for 
        expenditure only to pay the costs of activities and services 
        for which the fee is imposed; and''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (i).
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (d)(4) of such section is 
amended by striking ``, other than subsection (i),''.
                                 <all>
```
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2014-0578 Directorate ID: 2013-SW-048-AD

Helicopter Model: Airbus Deutschland Helicopters Model MBB-BK 117C-2 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): Airbus Deutschland Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The proposed actions are intended to prevent the loss of an attachment screw, which 

could result in movement of the output lever in an axial direction, contact of a bolt connecting 

the control rod to an output lever with the actuator housing, and subsequent loss of helicopter 

control. 

Costs: Applying torque and torque marking to the lateral and longitudinal trim actuator output 

levers requires 1 work-hour for a labor cost of $85. No parts are needed, so the cost for the U.S. 

fleet totals $8,500. Visually inspecting for correct torque requires 0.5 work-hour for a labor cost 

of about $43. No parts are needed, so the total cost for the U.S. fleet is $4,300 per inspection 

cycle. 

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Matt Wilbanks
§ 1601.6 Submission of information. ( a ) The Commission shall receive information concerning alleged violations of title VII, the ADA, GINA, or the PWFA from any person. Where the information discloses that a person is entitled to file a charge with the Commission, the appropriate office shall render assistance in the filing of a charge. Any person or organization may request the issuance of a Commissioner charge for an inquiry into individual or systematic discrimination. Such request, with any pertinent information, should be submitted to the nearest District, Field, Area, or Local office.
( b ) A person who submits data or evidence to the Commission may retain or, on payment of lawfully prescribed costs, procure a copy of transcript thereof, except that a witness may for good cause be limited to inspection of the official transcript of his or her testimony.
[42 FR 55388, Oct. 14, 1977, as amended at 52 FR 26957, July 17, 1987; 54 FR 32061, Aug. 4, 1989; 56 FR 9624, Mar. 7, 1991; 71 FR 26828, May 9, 2006; 74 FR 63982, Dec. 7, 2009; 89 FR 11169, Feb. 14, 2024]
§ 91.1081 Crewmember training requirements. ( a ) Each program manager must include in its training program the following initial and transition ground training as appropriate to the particular assignment of the crewmember: ( 1 ) Basic indoctrination ground training for newly hired crewmembers including instruction in at least the— ( i ) Duties and responsibilities of crewmembers as applicable;
( ii ) Appropriate provisions of this chapter;
( iii ) Contents of the program manager's management specifications (not required for flight attendants); and
( iv ) Appropriate portions of the program manager's operating manual.
( 2 ) The initial and transition ground training in §§ 91.1101 and 91.1105, as applicable.
( 3 ) Emergency training in § 91.1083.
( b ) Each training program must provide the initial and transition flight training in § 91.1103, as applicable.
( c ) Each training program must provide recurrent ground and flight training as provided in § 91.1107.
( d ) Upgrade training in §§ 91.1101 and 91.1103 for a particular type aircraft may be included in the training program for crewmembers who have qualified and served as second in command on that aircraft.
( e ) In addition to initial, transition, upgrade and recurrent training, each training program must provide ground and flight training, instruction, and practice necessary to ensure that each crewmember— ( 1 ) Remains adequately trained and currently proficient for each aircraft, crewmember position, and type of operation in which the crewmember serves; and
( 2 ) Qualifies in new equipment, facilities, procedures, and techniques, including modifications to aircraft.
#### § 91.1059 Flight time limitations and rest requirements: One or two pilot crews.

(a) No program manager may assign any flight crewmember, and no flight crewmember may accept an assignment, for flight time as a member of a one- or two-pilot crew if that crewmember's total flight time in all commercial flying will exceed—

(1) 500 hours in any calendar quarter;

(2) 800 hours in any two consecutive calendar quarters;

(3) 1,400 hours in any calendar year.

(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, during any 24 consecutive hours the total flight time of the assigned flight, when added to any commercial flying by that flight crewmember, may not exceed—

(1) 8 hours for a flight crew consisting of one pilot; or

(2) 10 hours for a flight crew consisting of two pilots qualified under this subpart for the operation being conducted.

(c) No program manager may assign any flight crewmember, and no flight crewmember may accept an assignment, if that crewmember's flight time or duty period will exceed, or rest time will be less than—

| | Normal duty | Extension of flight time |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) Minimum Rest Immediately Before Duty | 10 Hours | 10 Hours. |
| (2) Duty Period | Up to 14 Hours | Up to 14 Hours. |
| (3) Flight Time For 1 Pilot | Up to 8 Hours | Exceeding 8 Hours up to 9 Hours. |
| (4) Flight Time For 2 Pilots | Up to 10 Hours | Exceeding 10 Hours up to 12 Hours. |
| (5) Minimum After Duty Rest | 10 Hours | 12 Hours. |
| (6) Minimum After Duty Rest Period for Multi-Time Zone Flights | 14 Hours | 18 Hours. |