alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 -rf.·c£. ·· ... : ......**~···*****-5"'** r-7 1 ""·Tr'ZsrJWFF¥·2-.C?*X-+..i.¥2*··¥-+rr¥-X.......z....**x~..,.t,za.** 1 · ·trz¥9wm 1 ..&+¥i&.az..¥¥Pxl+zw$.,--.,.y.,.···· 1 s..t.. H·3

·-

December 22, 2014 Scott Faulk Essential Air Service 308 Grady Montgomery Drive Jackson, TN 38301 Office: 731-423-0995- Fax: 731-423-0997

United States Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

RE: Order 2014-10-21

Dear Mr. Secretary: After careful review of submitted proposalsto provide air seryice to Jackson, Tennessee, the Jackson-Madison County Airport Authority**consid~rs** Air Choice One the best option for Jackson

. ·' ·, ·: . The Authority reached this conclusion after

## ~**perfo~nce** auditofthe current carrier Seaport Airlines. Seaport has failed to meet original

### expe~ta;tions.• Over the last 12 months, Seaport's completion rate has been 78%, Additionally, Seaport has reduced efforts to increase their customer base in Jackson.

### Mainteri~ncehis also been an issue with Seapprt. J>lapes.pulledfor service often were out for weeks. This resulted 

### in cancelled flights to**Jackson~.** On many occasions, passengers have missedurgent connections because ofcancelled fHghts. Poor reliability has resulted in the loss ofpotential customers. TheNashville Airport is an easy 

### 2:5 hour drive from Jackson. The Authority believes a change in the destination city 

## and the air carrier will encourage passengers to use air service from McKellar-Sipes Regional Airport. The St. Louis Airport Authority and Air Choice One are 

### inpartnership promoting air service to the St. Louis Airport. Passengers will go through TSA screening in St. Louis and will have direct access to the terminal rather than being shuttled from an FBO to the terminal. The Jackson-Madison County Airport Authority is convinced that a change is necessary, and the above mentioned partnership is the best option for Jackson. The Authority supports the bid ofAir Choice One.

Tim Wilson, Chairman Jackson-Madison County Airport Authority '!

n·r .. .. $ t .Xl! 5. S.S**~** 2 -· l-+·2.&5 ·z%"?'5"Tf www.mckellarsipes.com
#### § 1691.3 Confidentiality.

When an agency receives information obtained by EEOC, the agency shall observe the confidentiality requirements of sections 706(b) and 709(e) of title VII as would EEOC, except in cases where the agency receives the same information from a source independent of EEOC or has referred a joint complaint to EEOC under this regulation. In such cases, the agency may use independent source information or information obtained by EEOC under the agency's investigative authority in a subsequent title VI, title IX or revenue sharing act enforcement proceeding. Agency questions concerning confidentiality shall be directed to the Deputy Legal Counsel, EEOC.

[48 FR 3574, Jan. 25, 1983, as amended at 52 FR 4902, Feb. 18, 1987]
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION 

 

I, Martha J. Kelley, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Heartland Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2004; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]; 

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 

 

Date: August 12, 2004
#### § 1690.302 Issuances proposed by EEOC.

Whenever the EEOC proposes to develop a significant issuance or any issuance requiring consultation, the procedure outlined in these regulations, shall also apply, as set forth in section 1-303 of the Order. The EEOC shall advise and consult with other affected agencies whenever it develops an issuance, in the same manner and to the same extent as other agencies are required to do in § 1690.301 of this part, and in other sections below.
[No. 20305-1-III.

Division Three.

December 3, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Steven Paul White, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 01-1-00226-1, Paul A. Bastine, J., entered June 22, 2001. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, C.J., concurred in by Schultheis and Kato, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TOWER FINANCIAL CORPORATION FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFRENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         572,158
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      13,215,729
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             6,104,212
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               692,934
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         5,537,023
<LOANS>                                     30,500,873
<ALLOWANCE>                                  (455,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,167,929
<DEPOSITS>                                  34,186,445
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            145,983
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,530,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,305,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              56,167,929
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                387,832
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              102,549
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               409,684
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               900,065
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             252,102
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             252,102
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          647,963
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,443,633
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,160,835)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 (1,160,835)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,160,835)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.54)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             (455,000)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

The Federal Communications Commission will hold an Open Meeting on the subjects listed below on Monday, May 15, 2000, which is scheduled to commence at 9:30 a.m. in Room TW-C305, at 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. 

### Item No., Bureau, and Subject

1—Common Carrier and Office of Engineering and Technology—Title: 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review of Part 68 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations (CC Docket No. 99-216). 

Summary: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to streamline Part 68 technical rules and registration process.

Additional information concerning this meeting may be obtained from Maureen Peratino or David Fiske, Office of Media Relations, telephone number (202) 418-0500; TTY (202) 418-2555.

                    Copies of materials adopted at this meeting can be purchased from the FCC's duplicating contractor, International Transcription Services, Inc. (ITS, Inc.) at (202) 857-3800; fax (202) 857-3805 and 857-3184; or TTY (202) 293-8810. These copies are available in paper format and alternative media, including large print/type; digital disk; and audio tape. ITS may be reached by e-mail: its_inc@ix.netcom.com. Their Internet address is                     *http://www.itsi.com*. This meeting can be viewed over George Mason University's Capitol Connection. The Capitol Connection also will carry the meeting live via the Internet.                

For information on these services call (703) 993-3100. The audio portion of the meeting will be broadcast live on the Internet via the FCC's Internet audio broadcast page at <http://www.fcc.gov/​realaudio/​>. The meeting can also be heard via telephone, for a fee, from National Narrowcast Network, telephone (202) 966-2211 or fax (202) 966-1770. Audio and video tapes of this meeting can be purchased from Infocus, 341 Victory Drive, Herndon, VA 20170, telephone (703) 834-0100; fax number (703) 834-0111.

Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-12002  Filed 5-9-00; 2:18 pm]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
#### § 1472.670 Suspension.

*Suspension* means an action taken by a Federal agency that immediately prohibits a recipient from participating in Federal Government procurement contracts and covered nonprocurement transactions for a temporary period, pending completion of an investigation and any judicial or administrative proceedings that may ensue. A recipient so prohibited is suspended, in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation for procurement contracts (48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4) and the common rule, Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), that implements Executive Order 12549 and Executive Order 12689. Suspension of a recipient is a distinct and separate action from suspension of an award or suspension of payments under an award.
EXHIBIT 32.1 -- CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER OF FIRST CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL, INC., PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SECTION 1350 OF 18 U.S.C. 63.


I, Alex Genin, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of
First  Capital  International,  Inc.  hereby  certify  that  First  Capital
International, Inc.'s periodic report on Form 10QSB and the financial statements
contained therein fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  (15  U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d) and that
information  contained  in  the  periodic report on Form 10QSB and the financial
statements  contained  therein  fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial  condition  and  results  of  the  operations  of  First  Capital
International,  Inc.


Date:  November 13, 2007    /s/ Alex Genin
                            Chief Executive Officer and
                            Acting Chief Financial Officer
§ 89.305 Minimum message elements broadcast by standard remote identification unmanned aircraft. A standard remote identification unmanned aircraft must be capable of broadcasting the following remote identification message elements: ( a ) The identity of the unmanned aircraft, consisting of: ( 1 ) A serial number assigned to the unmanned aircraft by the person responsible for the production of the standard remote identification unmanned aircraft; or
( 2 ) A session ID.
( b ) An indication of the latitude and longitude of the control station.
( c ) An indication of the geometric altitude of the control station.
( d ) An indication of the latitude and longitude of the unmanned aircraft.
( e ) An indication of the geometric altitude of the unmanned aircraft.
( f ) An indication of the velocity of the unmanned aircraft.
( g ) A time mark identifying the Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) time of applicability of a position source output.
( h ) An indication of the emergency status of the unmanned aircraft.
Exhibit 8.1

Significant Subsidiaries

The following table sets forth our significant subsidiaries as of May 29, 2009:



|                                                     |  |                              |  |                
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ---------------
|Name of Company                                      |  | Jurisdiction ofEstablishment |  | PercentageOwned
|CIBSA(1)                                             |  | Mexico                       |  | 100.0%         
|Coca-Cola FEMSA(2)                                   |  | Mexico                       |  | 53.7%          
|Propimex, S.A. de C.V.                               |  | Mexico                       |  | 53.7%          
|Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S.A. de C.V. |  | Mexico                       |  | 53.7%          
|Panamco México, S.A. de C.V.                         |  | Mexico                       |  | 51.9%          
|Refrescos Latinoamericanos, S.A. de C.V. .           |  | Mexico                       |  | 53.7%          
|Spal Industria Brasileira de Bebidas, S.A.           |  | Brazil                       |  | 52.6%          
|Emprex Cerveza                                       |  | Mexico                       |  | 100.0%         
|Desarrollo Comercial FEMSA, S.A. de C.V.             |  | Mexico                       |  | 100.0%         
|FEMSA Cerveza                                        |  | Mexico                       |  | 100.0%         
|Cervecería Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma, S.A. de C.V.        |  | Mexico                       |  | 100.0%         
|FEMSA Comercio                                       |  | Mexico                       |  | 100.0%         



|(1) | Compañía Internacional de Bebidas, S.A. de C.V., which we refer to as CIBSA.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Percentage of capital stock. FEMSA owns 63.0% of the capital stock with full voting rights.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### POST MOTOR SALES CO v LAMSON CO

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist, Sandusky Co

No 214

Harry Garn, Fremont, for Motor Sales Co.

White, Cannon & Spieth, Cleveland, for Lamson Co.

*430LLOYD, J.

The contract was prepared by plaintiff on a printed form and therefore is to be construed most favorably to the defendant. In the blank spaces of the paragraph of the contract last above quoted lines were typed as therein indicated. The entire paragraph could have been thus eliminated from the contract, but it was retained therein by act of the plaintiff. Not being inconsistent with any of the other conditions thereof it must be construed as privileging the defendant to cancel the contract at any time after the installation of the carrier system without paying any sums in addition to the amount of the rentals to be paid as therein provided.

Paragraph 8 of the contract privileges the defendant to purchase the carrier system for the sum of $600.00 at any time within 90 days from date of its installation, if payment has been made of any amounts due in accordance with the terms of the contract. The stipulated sale price of the carrier system when installed, if the option thus given to defendant had been exercised, approximated one half of the aggregate amount 'of- the rentals for the entire ten year term of the contract.

The members of this court are unanimously of the opinion that the finding of the trial court and the judgment rendered thereon are manifestly against the weight of the evidence, but refrain from commenting further upon the evidence because, for the reason given, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the court of common pleas for a new trial.

Williams and Richards, JJ, concur.
#### § 1614.406 Time limits. [Reserved]
#### John S. Taylor, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. The First National Bank, of St. Petersburg, a Corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

This case was decided *by*Division A.

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County.

*McMullen & McMullen,*for Plaintiff in Error.

*E. B. (hi/nby*and *Wm. Hunter,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

In accordance with an agreement filed herein and upon the authority of the decision in the case of Ulmer v. First National. Bank of St. Petersburg this day filed, the judgment herein is reversed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0243 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ZECHARIAH JUSTIN DANIEL SMITH,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 13, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 5 2022

12/05/2022
Case Number: DA 22-0243
#### § 1450.6 Informal action.

Nothing contained in this regulation is intended to preclude utilization of informal administrative actions or remedies which may be available.
# EUR-Lex - 31994R1026 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31994R1026

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1026/94 of 2 May 1994 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1538/91 introducing detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EEC) No 1906/90 on certain marketing standards for poultry **

*
Official Journal L 112 , 03/05/1994 P. 0032 - 0032 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 57 P. 0055 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 57 P. 0055 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1026/94 of 2 May 1994 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1538/91 introducing detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EEC) No 1906/90 on certain marketing standards for poultry

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1906/90 of 26 June on certain marketing standards for poultry (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 3204/93 (2), and in particular Articles 9 thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1538/91 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2891/93 (4), specifies the Community reference laboratory responsible for checking the water content of frozen and quick-frozen chickens and their respective competences and tasks; whereas the level reference laboratory to carry out the tasks laid down;

Whereas Community financial assistance should initially be provided for a period of three years; whereas this will be re-examined with a view to granting an extension prior to expiry of the initial period;

Whereas a contract should be concluded between the European Community and the Community reference laboratory setting out the conditions governing payment of financial assistance;

Whereas the Management Committee for Poultrymeat and Eggs has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by the chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The following paragraph 14 is hereby added to Article 14a of Regulation (EEC) No 1538/91:

'14. The Community shall grant the Community reference laboratory "Het Spelderholt", Centre for Poultry Research and Information Services, Beekbergen, the Netherlands, financial assistance of a maximum of ECU 75 000 for a period of three years for the completion of the tasks referrerd to in Annex IX paragraph 1.

The financial assistance shall be paid to the reference laboratory in accordance with the terms of a contract concluded between the Commission, acting on behalf of the European Community, and the laboratory.

The Director-General of the Directorate-General for Agriculture shall be authorized to sign the contract on behalf of the Commission.`

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 May 1994.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 173, 6. 7. 1990, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 289, 24. 11. 1993, p. 3.

(3) OJ No L 143, 7. 6. 1991, p. 11.

(4) OJ No L 263, 22. 10. 1993, p. 12.