alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.15

    


    First Amendment to
Employment Agreement

    


    This First Amendment (“First
Amendment”), to the Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") dated February 27,
2007 between Payment Data Systems, Inc. ("PDS") and Michael R. Long
(“Executive") is entered into this 12th day of November, 2009 and is
made part of the Agreement
which is hereby amended as follows:

    


    1.           Definitions.  All
capitalized terms used herein and not expressly defined herein shall have the
respective meanings given to such terms in the Agreement.

    


    2.           Entire
Agreement.  Except as expressly modified by this First
Amendment, the Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect in
accordance with its terms and shall constitute the legal, valid, binding and
enforceable obligations of PDS and Executive.

    


    3.           Successors and
Assigns.  This First Amendment shall be binding upon and inure
to the benefit of the successors and permitted assigns of the parties
hereto.

    


    4.           Section
References.  Section titles and references used in this First
Amendment shall be without substantive meaning or content of any kind whatsoever
and are not a part of the agreements among the parties hereto evidenced
hereby.

    


    5.           Now,
therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein and for
other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy, receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged:

    


    a. The Base Salary as set forth in
Schedule 4(a)(i) of Schedule 1 to the Agreement is hereby amended to be $190,000
per annum in year 2009.

    


    This
First Amendment amends the Agreement as set forth herein. All previously
existing obligations under the Agreement are hereby reaffirmed in all
respects.

    


    In
witness thereof, the parties
hereto have caused this First Amendment to the Agreement to be executed on the day and
year first above written.

    


    
      	 
      	
              Payment Data Systems, Inc.

            	
              Executive

            
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
              By:

            	
              /s/ Louis A. Hoch

            	 
      	
              By:

            	
              /s/ Michael R. Long

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Name: Louis A. Hoch

            	
              Name: Michael R. Long

            
	 
      	
              Title: President & COO
§ ̈¦15 

A Allb be er rtta a

Glacier

National Park 

GLACIER 

Blackfeet Indian

Reservation 

S Sa as sk ka attc ch he ew wa an n

Cut Bank Browning 

LIBERTY HILL

TOOLE 

by 2

£¤89

Shel £¤

Chester 

CHOUTEAU 

232 

66
 £¤191

VALLEY Fort Benton 

PHILLIPS 

CMR National

Wildlife Refuge 

")

")

£¤87

BLAINE
 

Havre 

Chinook 

Malta Ft. Belknap Rocky Boy's Indian Reservation Indian Reservation 

Glasgow 

0 25 50 100

Created by the Malta Field Office in December 2012 Miles 1:1,500,000 Albers Equal Area, NAD83, Meters 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

HiLine District 

Fluid Mineral Leasing Stipulations 

Closed To Leasing 

No Surface Occupancy 

Towns 

Interstate

® 

for Future Leasing

Alternative E (Preferred)
 Minor Constraints Highway or State Route 

Map shows the Leasing Stipulations for Oil and Gas for Standard Lease Terms Only RMP Boundary

Alternative E (Preferred). Stipulations apply only to 

minerals managed by the BLM. Not Analyzed County 

Map 2.4 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data

for individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by the BLM.

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed

through digital means and information may be updated without notification. 

! H i L i n e R M P

Kalispell 

!

Great Falls 

!

Lewistown

^Helena 

! ! Miles City

Butte !

Billings
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Steven K. Singh, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 548]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Tisch, J.), rendered November 22, 1994, convicting him of murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

According due deference to the Supreme Court’s findings of fact and credibility *(see, People v Prochilo,*41 NY2d 759), the record supports the determination that the lineup procedures were not suggestive *(see, People v Chipp,*75 NY2d 327).

The defendant was tried with codefendant Tyrone Rudolph *(see, People v Rudolph,*266 AD2d 568 [decided herewith]). However, dual juries were used to avoid any prejudice due to their separate confessions *(see, Bruton v United States,*391 US 123). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, this procedure was appropriate under the circumstances *(see, People v Brockway,*255 AD2d 988). A trial by dual juries is a modified form of severance, and the use of dual juries is to be evaluated under the standards for reviewing severance motions generally *(see, People v Irizarry,*83 NY2d 557; *People v Ricardo B.,*73 NY2d 228). Here, the defendant failed to make the requisite showing of prejudice *(see, People v Brown,*232 AD2d 750).

The sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

*570The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.
#### Mendelson Bros. Factors, Inc., Appellant, *v.*Walter E. Sachs et al., Individually and Composing the Firm of Goldman Sachs and Company, Respondents, Impleaded with Others.

Submitted January 11, 1937;

decided January 12, 1937.

*Walter H. Pollak*for motion.

*Alexander Slater*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs, and ten dollars costs of motion, unless appellant files undertaking on appeal -within ten days and pays ten dollars costs, in which event the motion is denied.
§ 1471.215 Which nonprocurement transactions are not covered transactions? The following types of nonprocurement transactions are not covered transactions: ( a ) A direct award to— ( 1 ) A foreign government or foreign governmental entity;
( 2 ) A public international organization;
( 3 ) An entity owned (in whole or in part) or controlled by a foreign government; or
( 4 ) Any other entity consisting wholly or partially of one or more foreign governments or foreign governmental entities.
( b ) A benefit to an individual as a personal entitlement without regard to the individual's present responsibility (but benefits received in an individual's business capacity are not excepted). For example, if a person receives social security benefits under the Supplemental Security Income provisions of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1301 *et seq.,* those benefits are not covered transactions and, therefore, are not affected if the person is excluded.
( c ) Federal employment.
( d ) A transaction that the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service needs to respond to a national or agency-recognized emergency or disaster.
( e ) A permit, license, certificate, or similar instrument issued as a means to regulate public health, safety, or the environment, unless the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service specifically designates it to be a covered transaction.
( f ) An incidental benefit that results from ordinary governmental operations.
( g ) Any other transaction if the application of an exclusion to the transaction is prohibited by law.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SkyLynx Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), we, Gary L. Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Daniel J. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Gary L. Brown                               Gary L. Brown, President and Chief
Executive Officer
November 16, 2004

/s/ Daniel J. Sullivan                           Daniel J. Sullivan, Chief Financial 
Officer
November 16, 2004
#### MONTGOMERY LIGHT & TRACTION CO. v. DAVIS.

(Decided December 21, 1916.)

Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson.

Rushton, Williams & Crenshaw, for appellant.

W. E. Andrews, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed by appellant.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Selected Financial
Data," to the use of our report dated November 4, 1999 included in the Annual
Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended September 30, 1999, and to the
incorporation by reference in the Amdocs Registration Statement on Form S-8
relating to the ITDS 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999 Stock Incentive Plans (File No.
333-91847) of our report dated November 4, 1999 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Amdocs Limited included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F)
for the year ended September 30, 1999.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
December 6, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,290
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  131,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,605
<INVENTORY>                                     39,556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         716,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                  72,831
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,559,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        989,428
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           568
<OTHER-SE>                                     412,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,559,394
<SALES>                                        142,792
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               558,421
<CGS>                                           94,594
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  309,001
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               127,941
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              69,479
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,571
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,648
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,923
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,923
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Eugene B. Johnson, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of FairPoint Communications, Inc. (the "Company");

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:



5.     The
Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors
and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 5, 2009

/s/ EUGENE B. JOHNSONEugene B. Johnson Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
#### § 1625.5 Employment applications.

A request on the part of an employer for information such as *Date of Birth* or *age* on an employment application form is not, in itself, a violation of the Act. But because the request that an applicant state his age may tend to deter older applicants or otherwise indicate discrimination against older individuals, employment application forms that request such information will be closely scrutinized to assure that the request is for a permissible purpose and not for purposes proscribed by the Act. That the purpose is not one proscribed by the statute should be made known to the applicant by a reference on the application form to the statutory prohibition in language to the following effect:

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 prohibits discrimination on the basis of age with respect to individuals who are at least 40 years of age,” or by other means. The term “employment applications,” refers to all written inquiries about employment or applications for employment or promotion including, but not limited to, résumés or other summaries of the applicant's background. It relates not only to written preemployment inquiries, but to inquiries by employees concerning terms, conditions, or privileges of employment as specified in section 4 of the Act.

[46 FR 47726, Sept. 29, 1981, as amended at 53 FR 5972, Feb. 29, 1988; 72 FR 36875, July 6, 2007]
.P-o-ft&y 1130$ Ci\n you, fiUof-c vp&4c t^ CM ^y op^/ fU*^ U C^)Jfisnc/scle, /4

C^eftUt -Z^f, /£///• /^^ # n?&oy 

### RECEIVED IN COUBTOFCRIMIMAI APPEALS SEP 01 21^
exv10w1w2






Exhibit 10.1.2




October 30, 2009




Susan Vogt

President and Chief Executive Officer

SeraCare Life Sciences, Inc.

37 Birch Street

Milford, MA 01757




          Re: Modification of Award



Dear Ms. Vogt:



This letter will confirm your agreement with and acknowledgment of the following:



You hereby consent to the modification of the Award Opportunity provided to you under the SeraCare
Life Sciences, Inc. Management Incentive Plan effective as of October 1, 2007 (the “Plan”)
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009 and pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Employment
Agreement between you and the Company dated July 14, 2006, as currently amended and in effect (the
“Agreement”) such that 25% of the Award Payment shall be payable in cash and 75% of the
Award Payment shall be payable in shares of common stock of SeraCare Life Sciences, Inc. (the
“Company”) on the criteria previously set by the Board of Directors of the Company. The
number of shares of the Company’s common stock that will be granted to you will equal 75% of the
Award Payment divided by the closing price per share of the Company’s common stock on the date of
grant of such shares (the “Share Grant Date”). The resulting share total shall be rounded
down to the nearest whole share and any fractional amount shall be payable in cash. These shares
shall be granted pursuant to the Company’s 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. Notwithstanding any of the
foregoing, the Company may in its discretion pay cash (in lieu of shares) equal to the actual fair
market value of any portion or all of such shares on the Share Grant Date.



For the avoidance of doubt, the Company may withhold from cash amounts otherwise payable to you,
including up to the entire amount of the cash portion of the Award Payment and including other
amounts payable to you on or prior to the Share Grant Date, such amounts as the Company determines
in its discretion may be required to be withheld for tax purposes with respect to the Award Payment
(including both the cash and the stock portions thereof). All capitalized terms above which are
not defined herein are as defined in the Plan.




 









 







Except as specifically modified and amended herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall
remain unmodified and in full force and effect.



Please indicate your agreement to the terms of this letter by countersigning this letter in the
space provided below and returning your original signed letter to the Company.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Very truly yours,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	SeraCare Life Sciences, Inc.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:

Name:
	 	/s/ Eugene Davis
 

Eugene Davis
	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Chairman of the Board	 	 






Accepted and agreed to under seal this 30th day of October, 2009




	 	 	 
	/s/ Susan Vogt
 

Susan Vogt
#### HOBDY v. THE STATE.

(Decided January 30, 1917.)

Appeal from Pike Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce.

E. R. Brannen, for appellant.

W. L. Martin, Attorney General.

Brown, J.

No bill of exceptions and no error of record. Affirmed.
#### THE STATE v. KUYKENDALL.

(Decided December 19, 1916.)

Appeal from Winston Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. J. J. Curtis.

W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

No counsel marked for appellee.

Brown, J.

The appeal is dismissed on the authority of *State v. Berkstresser,*137 Ala. 109, 34 South. 686, holding that the statute does not authorize an appeal in this case.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24694-24695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9941]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Nevada

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Nevada. The Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that 
public notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, May 16, 2012, 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Atomic Testing Museum, 755 East Flamingo Road, Las Vegas, 
Nevada 89119.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise Rupp, Board Administrator, 232 
Energy Way, M/S 505, North Las Vegas, Nevada 89030. Phone: (702) 630-
0522; Fax (702) 295-5300 or Email: nssab@nv.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the 
Board is to make recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the 
areas of environmental restoration, waste management, and related 
activities.

Tentative Agenda:
    1. Groundwater Update
    2. Student Liaison Project Update
    3. Industrial Sites--Long-term Monitoring at Closed Sites

    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Nevada, welcomes the attendance 
of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will make every 
effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or special 
needs. If you require special accommodations due to a disability, 
please contact Denise Rupp at least seven days in advance of the 
meeting at the phone number listed above. Written statements may be 
filed with the Board either before or after the meeting. Individuals 
who wish to make

[[Page 24695]]

oral presentations pertaining to agenda items should contact Denise 
Rupp at the telephone number listed above. The request must be received 
five days prior to the meeting and reasonable provision will be made to 
include the presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal 
Officer is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Individuals wishing to make 
public comments will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present 
their comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing to Denise Rupp at the 
address listed above or at the following Web site: http://nv.energy.gov/nssab/MeetingMinutes.aspx.

    Issued at Washington, DC on April 18, 2012.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-9941 Filed 4-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
§ 1620.32 Recordkeeping requirements. ( a ) Employers having employees subject to the Act are required to keep records in accordance with U.S. Department of Labor regulations found at 29 CFR part 516 (Records To Be Kept by Employers Under the FLSA). The regulations of that part are adopted herein by reference.
( b ) Every employer subject to the equal pay provisions of the Act shall maintain and preserve all records required by the applicable sections of 29 CFR part 516 and in addition, shall preserve any records which he makes in the regular course of his business operation which relate to the payment of wages, wage rates, job evaluations, job descriptions, merit systems, seniority systems, collective bargaining agreements, description of practices or other matters which describe or explain the basis for payment of any wage differential to employees of the opposite sex in the same establishment, and which may be pertinent to a determination whether such differential is based on a factor other than sex.
( c ) Each employer shall preserve for at least two years the records he makes of the kind described in § 1620.32(b) which explain the basis for payment of any wage differential to employees of the opposite sex in the same establishment.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3046-0019) (Pub. L. 96-511, 94 Stat. 2812 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*))
[46 FR 4888, Jan. 19, 1981, as amended at 46 FR 63268, Dec. 31, 1981. Redesignated at 51 FR 29819, Aug. 20, 1986]