alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ESTERLY etc v GOODMAN

Ohio Appeals, 7th Dist, Mahoning Co

Decided October 12, 1928

W. H. Woolf & George Edwards, both of Youngstown, for Esterly.

Ewing & Ewing, Youngstown, for Goodman.

*421POLLOCK, J.

The facts, in substance, alleged that plaintiff had been trespassing before this time upon the defendant’s premises and committing vandalism' and destruction of his property; that he had been warned to leave and desist and in place of doing so plaintiff threatened further vandalism and destruction of the property.

A person has a right to protect his property from a trespasser and to use such force as is reasonably necessary to do so, after first having warned or notified the trespasser to desist.

2 R. C. L., 555, Sec. -35.

The same principle is announced in 5 C. J., 631, Sec. 25. Under the principle above referred to the defendant had a right to protect his property from the plaintiff if he was committing the acts alleged in the answer, and could not be held to respond in damages unless in protecting his property he used excessive force or more force than is reasonably necessary for the protection of his property and to cause the trespasser to desist and cease trespassing.

So that under the allegations of the answer it was necessary in order that the plaintiff might recover, not only to prove the assault and injury,, but it was necessary for him to prove that in preventing him from committing vandalism and destruction of defendant’s property, that defendant used more force than was reasonably necessary for that purpose.

5 C. J., 663, Sec. 101.

And further, .this question is a question to be determined by the jury.

2 R. C. L. 556, Sec. 35.

We think it is clear that under the pleadings the court could not as a matter of law enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and the judgment of the court below is .affirmed.

Farr and Roberts, JJ., concur.
PUBLIC LAW 113–139—JULY 25, 2014 128 STAT. 1745 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1376: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Mar. 24, considered and passed House. 

July 10, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–139 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 369 Martin 

Luther King Jr. Drive in Jersey City, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Judge Shirley A. 

Tolentino Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JUDGE SHIRLEY A. TOLENTINO POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 369 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Jersey 

City, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Judge 

Shirley A. Tolentino Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Judge Shirley A. Tolentino Post Office Building’’. 

Approved July 25, 2014. 

July 25, 2014 

[H.R. 1376] 


srobinson on DSKB307YQ1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6716
GEORGE L. REID, Plaintiff - Appellant, and
JERRY HARRIS; LUIS LUGO; STEVEN J. RICHMOND; JOHN FARMER; ROBERT HUDSON; TYRONE WILKINS; DOUGLAS S. PEARSON; MAURICE JETT; WILLIAM KEITH SMITH; KENYATTA WILLIAMS; FLOYD D. ASHWOOD; T. KENDRICK; J. POWELL; K. KENNEY, Plaintiffs, versus STAN BARRY, Sheriff; JANE CORCORAN, Supervisor, Lt. Classification Unit; FAIRFAX COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-02-59-2) Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: August 2, 2002 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.2 Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George L. Reid, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: George L. Reid seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Reid’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrs. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on Feb. 6, 2002. Reid’s notice of appeal was filed on May 7, 2002. Because Reid failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### BENNETT v. THE STATE.

(Decided June 30, 1916.)

Appeal from Houston Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State. .

Pelham, P. J.

Appeal dismissed.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994

              														Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994, September 23, 1994.						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1047,			accessed on September 16, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### § 1471.455 What may I do if a lower tier participant fails to disclose the information required under § 1471.355 to the next higher tier?

If you as an agency official determine that a lower tier participant failed to disclose information, as required by § 1471.355, at the time it entered into a covered transaction with a participant at the next higher tier, you may pursue any remedies available to you, including the initiation of a suspension or debarment action.
#### McCoun & Sherman *vs.*Rowley & Bulkley.

ALBANY,

Dec. 1837.

An order of reference cannot regularly be made by a circuit judge at a circuit court holden by him, unless both parties be present, or on reasonable notice to the absent party.

Motion to set aside an order of reference made at the circuit. The cause was noticed for trial and was on the circuit calendar; before it was reached in the regular order of calling the calendar, on the *ex parte*application of the plaintiffs and without notice to the defendants, the circuit *86judge made an order for its reference. The defendants now moved to set aside the order of reference.

*I. W. Bishop,*for the defendants.

*D. Gardiner, jun.,*for the plaintiffs.

*By the Court,*

Nelson, Ch. J.

The practice at the circuit formerly was, when a cause was reached on the calendar and it was conceded by both parties that the trial would require the examination of a long account, to- make an order of reference; but not otherwise. The circuit judge no doubt has the right to make such order, if it be made to appear to him that the trial of the cause will require the examination of a long account; but both parties should be heard, or it should be shown that reasonable notice had been given to the party who does not appear, or to his counsel.

Motion granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      14,035,525
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     200,407,409
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            18,150,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 47,280,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      49,280,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        47,280,000
<LOANS>                                    208,647,453
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,761,809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             307,909,916
<DEPOSITS>                                 273,978,395
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,718,764
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    14,175,131
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,726,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             307,909,916
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             12,657,786
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,017,439
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            15,675,225
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,558,590
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,619,464
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       10,055,761
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  430,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              8,974,621
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,011,960
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,011,960
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,002,568
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.11
<LOANS-NON>                                    955,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   312,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,761,809
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  196,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    97,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,761,809
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,761,809
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
§ ̈¦15 

Created by the Malta Field Office in December 2012
 Albers Equal Area, NAD83, Meters
 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

HiLine District Office
 

Solid Minerals

Locatable Hardrock & Bentonite

Mineral Potentials
 

Map shows the Federal Mineral Estate for Locatable Minerals

(Hardrock & Bentonite) The mining potential for those minerals
 

varies even though they are both a locatable mineral, therefore

the potential is shown for each type of mining.
 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data

for individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by the BLM.

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed

through digital means and information may be updated without notification. 

A Allb be er rtta a Glacier

National Park 

Blackfeet Indian

Reservation 

S Sa as sk ka attc ch he ew wa an n

Browning 

GLACIER 

£¤89

Cut Bank LIBERTY HILL 

Shelby TOOLE £¤2 
 

Chester 

CHOUTEAU
 

232 

66
 £¤191

Fort Benton 

CCMMRRNNaattiioonnaall

WWiil

l

ddlliiffeeRReeffuuggee 

")

")

£¤87

BLAINE
 

Havre 

Chinook VALLEY
 

Malta

Rocky Boy's Ft. Belknap Indian Reservation Indian Reservation Glasgow

PHILLIPS 

High - Hardrock High - Bentonite Locatable Minerals Interstate 

Moderate - Hardrock Moderate - Bentonite Not Analyzed Highway or State Route 

Low - Hardrock Low - Bentonite ® RMP boundary Towns 

County 

0 25 50 100

Miles 

1:1,500,000 

Sweet Grass Hills 

Little Rocky Mountains 

Brazil Creek 

Map P.1 

! H i L i n e R M P

Kalispell 

Great

Falls 

!Lewistown

^Helena M

C

iles ! ! ity

Butte !Billings
#### FRANKEL CHEVROLET CO v H T LATHY MOTOR CO

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9966.

Decided May 13, 1929

E H Meisel and Henry Galen, Cleveland, for Frankel Co.

John A Lombard, Cleveland for Lathy Co.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court in deciding as it did, held that the absence of the bill of sale to plaintiff in error, in view of the requirements of the statute, rendered its claim to the possession of the' automobile invalid despite the fact that the automobile was physically delivered to it. The case of Ohio Farmers Ins. Co. v. Todino, 111 O. S. 274, syllabus, reads as follows:

(Here follows quotation)

In the opinion the court cites the case of Building Assoc, v Clark, 43 O. S. 427.

Further quoting from the opinion in the case of Bellidy v. Franklin Bank of Columbus, 16 O. 533, it was held:

(Here follows quotation)

In explicit terms the supreme court laid down the rule that no title to an automobile is conveyed in the absence of a bill of sale, and of course we feel bound by that decision. One is inclined to doubt the soundness of the reasoning in the case of Insurance Co. v. Todino, because at first blush it seems to unduly interfere with the right of individuals to freely contract with each other but regardless of our own inclination the decision of Insurance Co. v. Todino supra, sustains the judgment of the Municipal Court arid it is therefore affirmed.

Vickery, PJ, Levine and Sullivan, JJ, concur.
#### § 1472.635 Drug-free workplace.

*Drug-free workplace* means a site for the performance of work done in connection with a specific award at which employees of the recipient are prohibited from engaging in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance.
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.73 Eligibility. ( a ) Any manufacturer of aircraft manufactured within the United States who is a United States citizen may apply for Class I or Class II provisional type certificates, for amendments to provisional type certificates held by him, and for provisional amendments to type certificates held by him.
( b ) Any manufacturer of aircraft in a State of Manufacture subject to the provisions of an agreement with the United States for the acceptance of those aircraft for export and import may apply for a Class II provisional type certificate, for amendments to provisional type certificates held by him, and for provisional amendments to type certificates held by him.
( c ) An aircraft engine manufacturer who is a United States citizen and who has altered a type certificated aircraft by installing different type certificated aircraft engines manufactured by him within the United States may apply for a Class I provisional type certificate for the aircraft, and for amendments to Class I provisional type certificates held by him, if the basic aircraft, before alteration, was type certificated in the normal, utility, acrobatic, commuter, or transport category.
[Doc. No. 5085, 29 FR 14566, Oct. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 21-12, 31 FR 13380, Oct. 15, 1966; Amdt. 21-59, 52 FR 1836, Jan. 15, 1987; Amdt. 21-92, 74 FR 53387, Oct. 16, 2009]
Filed by sedaredgar.com - Clenergen Corporation - Exhibit 10.11










October 28, 2009 

Mr. Mark LM Quinn 
Chief Executive Officer 
Clenergen
Corporation 
Bath House 8 Chapel Place 
London ECZA. 3DO, UK 

 

Dear Mr. Quinn, 

Following our Manila meeting September 29, 2009, we would like
to request Clenergen Corporation to submit an unsolicited proposal for biomass
based power plants ranging from 1 – 2 – 4 – 8 MWs to meet our on-stream small
island power development program. 

These power plants are initially targeted for the islands of
Marinduque, Romblon and Palawan whose requirements range from 2 to four MWs
based on current studies.

We will also be requiring, under our Small Power Utility
Program, 1 MW power systems to support what we described as ‘missionary’ islands
currently deprived of electric power. 

It is our goal to have at least one pilot project with
Clenergen, assuming all specifications and terms of payments are met and other
related conditions to start of this project. . In this context, we are prepared,
subject to terms; provide sovereign risks to facilitate payments for this
purpose. 

To move forward, may we invite Clenergen and its technical team
to visit the Philippines second week of November to discuss and submit firm
supply proposals under this program.

In preparation, we expect your side’s submission of letter of
intent the soonest time possible. 

With our best wishes,

 

Froilan Tampinco 
President 

NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION 
BIR Road corner Quezon Avenue,
Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines 
Telephone: (+632) 921-3541 * Fax: (+632)
921-2468
# EUR-Lex - 31997R1256 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31997R1256

**Council Regulation (EC) No 1256/97 of 25 June 1997 amending Regulation No 79/65/EEC setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operations of agricultural holdings in the European Economic Community **

*
Official Journal L 174 , 02/07/1997 P. 0007 - 0007 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1256/97 of 25 June 1997 amending Regulation No 79/65/EEC setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operations of agricultural holdings in the European Economic Community

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 43 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Whereas Regulation No 79/65/EEC of the Council of 15 June 1965 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operations of agricultural holdings in the European Economic Community (3), lays down certain restrictions on the use of accountancy data from agricultural holdings and other individual details obtained in implementation of that Regulation; whereas, given the risk that information supplied by a farmer could be used for purposes other than those provided for in the above Regulation, the prohibition on any unauthorized use of such information should be reinforced; whereas, therefore, the Regulation in question should be amended,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 15 (1) of Regulation No 79/65/EEC is hereby replaced by the following:

'1. It shall be prohibited to use for taxation purposes any individual accountancy data or other individual details obtained in implementation of this Regulation, or to divulge or use such data for purposes other than those specified in Article 1.`

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 25 June 1997.

For the Council

The President

J. VAN AARTSEN

(1) OJ No C 127, 24. 4. 1997, p. 15.

(2) OJ No C 167, 2. 6. 1997.

(3) OJ No 109, 23. 6. 1965, p. 1859/65. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2801/95 (OJ No L 291, 6. 12. 1995, p. 3).
#### BRECKEL, a minor, v MORTON, et

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co.

No. 9519.

Decided Dec. 17, 1928.

A. W. Bell, Cleveland, for Breckel.

Wilber R. Klein,' Cleveland, for Morton, et.

VICKERY J

Now it must be remembered that this was not put upon the ground that the defendant did not cause the damage, nor has it been argued to us that the defendant was not responsible for the accident, for it seems to have been assumed all through that defendant’s negligence caused the injury to the car driven by the plaintiff and which necessitated the hiring of the taxi*58cab. Now it is not true that a bailee in rightful possession of the car which is damaged by the wrongful act of another cannot maintain a suit, especially where he pays for the repairs that were caused by the defendant’s negligence, and we think in that respect the court was wrong and committed reversible error.

Now as to the six dollars paid for taxi hire, the court held that inasmuch as this young man was not of age, his father would be responsible for the taxicab hire and not he and, therefore, he could ¡not recover. That is a rather novel proposition of law. Under and by virtue of what theory is the father responsible? The young man hired a taxicab ;and paid for it and if this taxicab hire was made necessary by the negligent act of the defendant below, we know of no reason why the person who paid the taxicab bill could not recover it. We know of no law which would make the father liable or which would enable the father to recover, he not having paid the bill, and the court was wrong in thus deciding the proposition of law upon this question, and for both these reasons the cause will be reversed and remanded to the trial court for a new trial.

Sullivan, P J and Levin, J, concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Centracan  Incorporated,  a Florida
corporation  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the year ended June 30, 2008, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), Jerome Goubeaux, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his  knowledge,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section  13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all
              material   respects,   the   financial   condition   and result of
              operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906  has   been
provided to the Company,  and will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/Jerome Goubeaux
-----------------------
Jerome Goubeaux
Chief Executive Officer
August 19, 2008