alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 431.33 Safety organization. ( a ) An applicant shall maintain a safety organization and document it by identifying lines of communication and approval authority for all mission decisions that may affect public safety. Lines of communication within the applicant's organization, between the applicant and the launch site, and between the applicant and the reentry site, shall be employed to ensure that personnel perform RLV mission operations in accordance with plans and procedures required by this subpart. Approval authority shall be employed to ensure compliance with terms and conditions stated in an RLV mission license and with the plans and procedures required by this subpart.
( b ) An applicant must designate a person responsible for the conduct of all licensed RLV mission activities.
( c ) An applicant shall designate by name, title, and qualifications, a qualified safety official authorized by the applicant to examine all aspects of the applicant's operations with respect to safety of RLV mission activities and to monitor independently compliance by vehicle safety operations personnel with the applicant's safety policies and procedures. The safety official shall report directly to the person responsible for an applicant's licensed RLV mission activities, who shall ensure that all of the safety official's concerns are addressed both before a mission is initiated and before reentry or descent flight of an RLV is initiated. The safety official is responsible for— ( 1 ) Monitoring and evaluating operational dress rehearsals to ensure they are conducted in accordance with procedures required by § 431.37(a)(4) and under § 431.37(a)(1)(iv) to ensure the readiness of vehicle safety operations personnel to conduct a safe mission under nominal and non-nominal conditions; and
( 2 ) Completing a mission readiness determination as required by § 431.37 before an RLV mission is initiated. The safety official must monitor and report to the person responsible for the conduct of licensed RLV mission activities any non-compliance with procedures listed in §§ 431.37 and 431.43, or any representation contained in the application, and the readiness of the licensee to conduct mission operations in accordance with the license and this part. The safety official is responsible for compliance with §§ 431.37 and 431.43, and with representations contained in the application.
§ 19.3 Authorization. Departmental units are hereby authorized to request financial records of any customer from a financial institution pursuant to a formal written request under the Act only if: ( a ) No administrative summons or subpoena authority reasonably appears to be available to the Departmental unit to obtain financial records for the purpose for which the records are sought;
( b ) There is reason to believe that the records sought are relevant to a legitimate law enforcement inquiry and will further that inquiry;
( c ) The request is issued by the Assistant Secretary or Deputy Under Secretary heading the Departmental unit requesting the records, or by a senior agency official designated by the head of the Departmental unit. Officials so designated shall not delegate this authority to others;
( d ) The request adheres to the requirements set forth in § 19.4; and
( e ) The notice requirements set forth in section 1108(4) of the Act, or the requirements pertaining to delay of notice in section 1109 of the Act are satisfied, except in situations where no notice is required (e.g., section 1113(g)).
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                              UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of InkSure Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that the
Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Form 10-KSB") of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form
10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

     Dated: March 27, 2007                /s/ Elie Housman
                                          ----------------
                                          Elie Housman, Chief Executive Officer

     Dated: March 27, 2007                /s/ Mickey Brandt
                                          -----------------
                                          Mickey Brandt, Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided by the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### §§ 1601.72-1601.73 [Reserved]
#### § 253.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to set uniform disclosure requirements, which preempt any State requirements on the same subject, for terms incorporated by reference into contracts of carriage for scheduled service in interstate and overseas passenger air transportation.

[ER-1302, 47 FR 52134, Nov. 19, 1982, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15932, Apr. 16, 2019]
§ 27.999 Fuel system drains. ( a ) There must be at least one accessible drain at the lowest point in each fuel system to completely drain the system with the rotorcraft in any ground attitude to be expected in service.
( b ) Each drain required by paragraph (a) of this section must— ( 1 ) Discharge clear of all parts of the rotorcraft;
( 2 ) Have manual or automatic means to assure positive closure in the off position; and
( 3 ) Have a drain valve— ( i ) That is readily accessible and which can be easily opened and closed; and
( ii ) That is either located or protected to prevent fuel spillage in the event of a landing with landing gear retracted.
[Doc. No. 574, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-11, 41 FR 55470, Dec. 20, 1976; Amdt. 27-23, 53 FR 34213, Sept. 2, 1988]
HOMER LEE GREEN

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2493

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed November 3, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Edward P. Nickinson, III , Judge

.

Homer Lee Green, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32.1 – 906 Certification








GENMED HOLDING CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUNT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Genmed Holding Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Erwin R. Bouwens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.








By: /s/ Erwin R. Bouwens


Erwin R. Bouwens


Chief Executive Officer


and Chairman of the Board





April 16, 2013





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Genmed Holding Corp., and will be retained by Genmed Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### ARNOFF v. MARINO

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist-., Cuyahoga Co.

No. 8474.

Decided Oct. 8, 1928.

Niman & Buss, Cleveland, for Arnoff.

Gilbert M. Morgan, Cleveland, for Marino.

*5PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that the contention of plaintiff in error is right, because upon the state of the record, if the judgment obtained by defendant in error individually and in his own favor, were to remain undisturbed, there would be nothing to prevent the partnership which under the evidence was proven to have been the real party in interest and in whose name the the contractual relationship with plaintiff in error was established, to commence suit for the balance due upon such contract.

The judgment of the Common Pleas Court will therefore be reversed and final judgment entered in favor of plaintiff in error.

Sullivan P. J., Vickery and Levine JJ., concur.
#### REYNOLDS v. CAMPBELL.

(Decided November 23, 1916.)

Appeal from Chilton Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per cüriam.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
[No. 20657-2-III.

Division Three.

October 29, 2002.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Rebecca A. Seyler, *Respondent,*and Mickael J. Seyler, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Stevens County, No. 00-3-00007-5, Larry M. Kristianson, J., entered October 26, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, C.J., concurred in by Schultheis and Kato, JJ.
Exhibit 23.2




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


          We  consent to the  incorporation by reference  in the
          registration statement of Rymer  Foods Inc. on Form S-
          8 (File  No. 33-79346) and on  Form S-2 (File  No. 33-
          86062)  of our  report which  includes an  explanatory
          paragraph regarding  the uncertainty of  the Company's
          ability to continue as  a going concern dated December
          16, 1996, on our  audits of the consolidated financial
          statements and  financial statement schedule  of Rymer
          Foods  Inc. and subsidiaries  as of  October 26,  1996
          and October 28, 1995 and for each  of the two years in
          the  period ended October  26, 1996,  which report  is
          included on page 14 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                                                                
                                     /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.  

          Chicago, Illinois              COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
          January 22, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1236]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communications Systems; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communications 
Systems (1196).
    Date and Time: January 24-25, 2000, 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM.
    Place: Room 370, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Rajinder P. Khosla, Program Director, Room 
675, Division of Electrical and Communications Systems, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: (703) 306-1339.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate unsolicited proposals submitted 
in response to the program announcement (NSF 99-2).
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 13, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-1236 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Money4Gold Holdings, Inc


EXHIBIT 10.2




Money4Gold Holdings, Inc.

595 S. Federal Highway, Suite 600

Boca Raton, Florida 33432







October 9, 2009










Re:

Money4Gold / Settlement of Outstanding Debt







Dear Barry and Mike:




This letter agreement amends the letter agreement entered into on September 30, 2009 (the “Agreement”), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A, in order to correct a scriveners error.  The Agreement reflected GRQ Consultants, Inc. 401(K) (“GRQ”) and Barry Honig converting a $500,000 loan with the Company into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price per share of $0.0857.  The Agreement was meant to specify that $300,000 of the $500,000 loan had been made by GRQ and the remaining $200,000 had been loaned by Barry Honig, personally.  Accordingly, 3,500,584 shares shall be issued to GRQ and 2,333,723 to Barry Honig.




Please sign below evidencing your agreement to be bound by this Agreement.




		
	 
	 

	                                                                                        

	Very truly yours,


	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	/s/ Doug Feristein


	 
	Doug Feirstein


	 
	Chief Executive Officer







AGREED AND ACCEPTED:




		
	DOUG FEIRSTEIN

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ Doug Feirstein

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	TODD ORETSKY

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ Todd Oretsky

	 















		





			
	GRQ CONSULTANTS, INC. 401K

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	By:

	/s/ Barry Honig

	 

	Barry Honig, Trustee

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	BARRY HONIG

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ Barry Honig

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	MICHAEL BRAUSER

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ Michael Brauser
§ 91.1 Applicability. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b), (c), (e), and (f) of this section and §§ 91.701 and 91.703, this part prescribes rules governing the operation of aircraft within the United States, including the waters within 3 nautical miles of the U.S. coast.
( b ) Each person operating an aircraft in the airspace overlying the waters between 3 and 12 nautical miles from the coast of the United States must comply with §§ 91.1 through 91.21; §§ 91.101 through 91.143; §§ 91.151 through 91.159; §§ 91.167 through 91.193; § 91.203; § 91.205; §§ 91.209 through 91.217; § 91.221, § 91.225; §§ 91.303 through 91.319; §§ 91.323 through 91.327; § 91.605; § 91.609; §§ 91.703 through 91.715; and § 91.903.
( c ) This part applies to each person on board an aircraft being operated under this part, unless otherwise specified.
( d ) This part also establishes requirements for operators to take actions to support the continued airworthiness of each airplane.
( e ) This part does not apply to any aircraft or vehicle governed by part 103 of this chapter, or subparts B, C, or D of part 101 of this chapter.
( f ) Except as provided in §§ 107.13, 107.27, 107.47, 107.57, and 107.59 of this chapter, this part does not apply to any aircraft governed by part 107 of this chapter.
[Doc. No. 18334, 54 FR 34292, Aug. 18, 1989, as amended by Amdt. 91-257, 64 FR 1079, Jan. 7, 1999; Amdt. 91-282, 69 FR 44880, July 27, 2004; Amdt. 91-297, 72 FR 63410, Nov. 8, 2007; Amdt. 91-314, 75 FR 30193, May 28, 2010; Docket FAA-2015-0150, Amdt. 91-343, 81 FR 42208, June 28, 2016]
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certificationof the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the**

**Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

 

I,Gino Scotto, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the AnnualReport of Kenilworth Systems Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchAnnual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Kenilworth SystemsCorporation.

 
| By:    | /s/  Gino Scotto         |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Gino  Scotto             |
| Title: | Chief  Executive Officer |
| Date:  | July 5,  2005       |

 

1

----
Exhibit
10.1


 


STRAIGHT NOTE


 


$100,000                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    South
El Monte, California                                                                                                   March
13, 2003


 


For value received, Lee Pharmaceuticals promises to
pay Mark DiSalvo or order, at South El Monte, California the sum of ONE HUNDRED
THOUSAND DOLLARS, with interest from March 13, 2003, on unpaid principal at the
rate of twenty (20) per cent per annum; principal is payable monthly,
commencing May 10, 2003, with monthly principal payments of $5,000. Interest
shall be calculated on the basis of the unpaid principal balance daily, based
on a 365-day year, actual day month and payable monthly.  Principal and interest shall be payable in
lawful money of the United States.  If
action were instituted on this note, I promise to pay such sum as the Court may
fix as attorney’s fees.  This note is
secured by the trademark on the product brand Mapo® Bath Oil and Cam® Lotion.


 


 


	
  MARCH 13, 2003

  	
   

  	
  RONALD G. LEE

  	
   

  
	
  Date

  	
   

  	
  Lee Pharmaceuticals - Ronald G. Lee

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  MARCH 13, 2003

  	
   

  	
  MICHAEL L. AGRESTI

  	
   

  
	
  Date

  	
   

  	
  Lee Pharmaceuticals - Michael L. Agresti
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, David F. Hoffmeister, Chief Financial Officer of Invitrogen Corporation (the
Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                         
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------
|Dated: April 28, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ David F. Hoffmeister
|                      |  |  |  | David F. Hoffmeister    
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Invitrogen and will be retained by Invitrogen and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 1903.13 Imminent danger.

Whenever and as soon as a Compliance Safety and Health Officer concludes on the basis of an inspection that conditions or practices exist in any place of employment which could reasonably be expected to cause death or serious physical harm immediately or before the imminence of such danger can be eliminated through the enforcement procedures otherwise provided by the Act, he shall inform the affected employees and employers of the danger and that he is recommending a civil action to restrain such conditions or practices and for other appropriate relief in accordance with the provisions of section 13(a) of the Act. Appropriate citations and notices of proposed penalties may be issued with respect to an imminent danger even though, after being informed of such danger by the Compliance Safety and Health Officer, the employer immediately eliminates the imminence of the danger and initiates steps to abate such danger.
§ 93.224 Return of slots. ( a ) Whenever a slot is required to be returned under this subpart, the holder must notify the office specified in § 93.221(a)(1) in writing of the date after which the slot will not be used.
( b ) Slots may be voluntarily returned for use by other operators by notifying the office specified in § 93.221(a)(1) in writing.
#### § 102.8 [Reserved]
§ 417.221 Time delay analysis. ( a ) *General.* A flight safety analysis must include a time delay analysis that establishes the mean elapsed time between the violation of a flight termination rule and the time when the flight safety system is capable of terminating flight for use in establishing flight safety limits as required by § 417.213.
( b ) *Analysis constraints.* A time delay analyses must determine a time delay distribution that accounts for the following: ( 1 ) The variance of all time delays for each potential failure scenario, including but not limited to, the range of malfunction turn characteristics and the time of flight when the malfunction occurs;
( 2 ) A flight safety official's decision and reaction time, including variation in human response time; and
( 3 ) Flight termination hardware and software delays including all delays inherent in: ( i ) Tracking systems;
( ii ) Data processing systems, including all filter delays;
( iii ) Display systems;
( iv ) Command control systems; and
( v ) Flight termination systems.
Opinion filed July 9, 2009

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals

___________

No. 11-08-00174-CV

__________

 DAN EDSWORTH GREER, Appellant

V.

 DAVID THOMPSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 132nd District Court

 Scurry County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 22912

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties have filed a joint motion asking this court to set aside the trial court’s judgment

without regard to the merits and to remand the cause for further consideration in the trial court

consistent with the parties agreement. The motion is granted. 

Pursuant to the parties agreement, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause

is remanded.

July 9, 2009 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
##### 



Exhibit
10.03
 (COMERICA LOGO)Comerica Bank
    
    Phelps Dodge Tower
1 North Central Ave., Suite 1000
Phoenix, AZ 85004-4469
602 417-1100
Fax: 602 261-7881
  
  Agreement Borrower Lender
  Waived
Covenants




---



##### 



Acknowledgment Copy of Letter
 Covenant Waiver Fee
 Reimbursement of Lenders Costs and Expenses
  
    By:
    
    (Michael S. Browne)Name:
    
    Michael S. BrowneTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
  By:
    
    (Michael S. Browne)Name:
    
    Michael S. BrowneTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer