alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SpectraSite, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David
P. Tomick, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and
for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                   |  |                                          
|------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------
|                   |  |                                          
|September 25, 2003 |  | /s/ DAVID P. TOMICK                      
|                   |  |                                          
|                   |  |                                          
|                   |  | David P. Tomick                          
|                   |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
|                   |  | Officer and Assistant Secretary
|   | 1.     | Lexicon’s      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and to      which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic      Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | 2.     | The      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Lexicon.                                                                                                                                                 |

| By:    | /s/      Arthur T. Sands                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | Arthur      T. Sands, M.D., Ph.D.          |
|   | President      and Chief Executive Officer |

| By:    | /s/      Julia P. Gregory       |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | Julia      P. Gregory           |
|   | Executive      Vice President   |
|   | and      Chief FinancialOfficer |
§ 1626.15 Commission enforcement. ( a ) As provided in sections 9, 11, 16 and 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (29 U.S.C. 209, 211, 216 and 217) (FLSA) and sections 6 and 7 of this Act, the Commission and its authorized representatives may ( 1 ) investigate and gather data;
( 2 ) enter and inspect establishments and records and make transcripts thereof;
( 3 ) interview employees;
( 4 ) impose on persons subject to the Act appropriate recordkeeping and reporting requirements;
( 5 ) advise employers, employment agencies and labor organizations with regard to their obligations under the Act and any changes necessary in their policies, practices and procedures to assure compliance with the Act;
( 6 ) subpoena witnesses and require the production of documents and other evidence;
( 7 ) supervise the payment of amounts owing pursuant to section 16(c) of the FLSA, and
( 8 ) institute action under section 16(c) or section 17 of the FLSA or both to obtain appropriate relief.
( b ) Whenever the Commission has a reasonable basis to conclude that a violation of the Act has occurred or will occur, it may commence conciliation under section 7(b) of the Act. Notice of commencement of will ordinarily be issued in the form of a letter of violation; provided, however, that failure to issue a written violation letter shall in no instance be construed as a finding of no violation. The Commission will ordinarily notify the respondent and aggrieved persons of its determination. In the process of conducting any investigation or conciliation under this Act, the identity of persons who have provided information in confidence shall not be disclosed except in accordance with § 1626.4.
( c ) Any agreement reached as a result of efforts undertaken pursuant to this section shall, as far as practicable, require the respondent to eliminate the unlawful practice(s) and provide appropriate affirmative relief. Such agreement shall be reduced to writing and will ordinarily be signed by the Commission's delegated representative, the respondent, and the charging party, if any. The signed agreement shall be sent to all the signatories thereto.
( d ) Upon the failure of informal conciliation, conference and persuasion under section 7(b) of the Act, the Commission may initiate and conduct litigation.
( e ) The District Directors, Field Directors, Area Directors, and Local Directors, the Director of the Office of Field Programs or their designees, are hereby delegated authority to exercise the powers enumerated in § 1626.15(a) (1) through (7) and (b) and (c). The General Counsel or his/her designee is hereby delegated the authority to exercise the powers in paragraph (a) of this section and at the direction of the Commission to initiate and conduct litigation.
[48 FR 140, Jan. 3, 1983, as amended at 54 FR 32063, Aug. 4, 1989; 54 FR 33503, Aug. 15, 1989; 68 FR 70152, Dec. 17, 2003; 71 FR 26831, May 9, 2006; 85 FR 65219, Oct. 15, 2020; 86 FR 2985, Jan. 14, 2021; 89 FR 12233, Feb. 16, 2024]
§ 1650.205 Consideration of evidence submitted as a result of notification of intent. ( a ) *Consideration of evidence.* If, as a result of the notification of intent, EEOC receives notice that the debtor will submit additional evidence or receives additional evidence from the debtor within the prescribed time period, collection will be stayed until EEOC: ( 1 ) Considers the evidence presented by the debtor;
( 2 ) Determines whether all or a portion of the debt is still past-due and legally enforceable; and
( 3 ) Notifies the debtor of its determination. Failure to submit the evidence within 60 days from the date of notification of intent will result in a referral of the debt to Treasury.
( b ) *Notification to the debtor.* Following its review of the evidence, EEOC will issue a written decision notifying the debtor whether EEOC has sustained, amended, or canceled its determination that the debt is past-due and legally enforceable. The notice will advise the debtor of any further action to be taken, such as any modification of the debt amount and/or referral of the debt to Treasury, and explain the supporting rationale for the decision.
Section 302 Certifications                     Exhibit 31 (i)

I, James G. Rakes, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of National Bankshares, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a - 15 (e) and 15d - 15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluations; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: August 9, 2004

/s/ JAMES G. RAKES
-------------------------
James G. Rakes
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
# EUR-Lex - 31999D0343 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999D0343

**1999/343/EC: Commission Decision of 25 May 1999 amending Decision 97/468/EC on drawing up provisional lists of third country establishments from which the Member States authorise imports of wild game meat (notified under document number C(1999) 1373) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 131 , 27/05/1999 P. 0070 - 0071 *

COMMISSION DECISION

of 25 May 1999

amending Decision 97/468/EC on drawing up provisional lists of third country establishments from which the Member States authorise imports of wild game meat

(notified under document number C(1999) 1373)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(1999/343/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 95/408/EC of 22 June 1995 on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States are authorised to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs(1), as last amended by Decision 98/603/EC(2), and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,

(1) Whereas provisional lists of establishments producing wild game meat have been drawn up by Commission Decision 97/468/EC(3);

(2) Whereas Tunisia has sent a list of establishments producing wild game meat and for which the responsible authorities certify that the establishment is in accordance with the Community rules;

(3) Whereas a provisional list of establishments producing wild game meat can thus be drawn up for Tunisia;

(4) Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The text of the Annex to this Decision is added to the Annex of Decision 97/468/EC.

Article 2

This Decision shall apply from 25 May 1999.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 May 1999.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 243, 11.10.1995, p. 17.

(2) OJ L 289, 28.10.1998, p. 36.

(3) OJ L 199, 26.7.1997, p. 30.

ANEXO/BILAG/ANHANG/ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ/ANNEX/ANNEXE/ALLEGATO/BIJLAGE/ANEXO/LIITE/BILAGA

"País: TÚNEZ/Land: TUNESIEN/Land: TUNESIEN/Χώρα: ΤΥΝΗΣΙΑ/Country: TUNISIA/Pays: TUNISIE/Paese: TUNISIA/Land: TUNESIË/País: TUNÍSIA/Maa: TUNISIA/Land: TUNISIEN

>TABLE>"
§ 1910.123 Dipping and coating operations: Coverage and definitions. ( a ) Does this rule apply to me? ( 1 ) This rule (§§ 1910.123 through 1910.126) applies when you use a dip tank containing a liquid other than water. It applies when you use the liquid in the tank or its vapor to: ( i ) Clean an object;
( ii ) Coat an object;
( iii ) Alter the surface of an object; or
( iv ) Change the character of an object.
( 2 ) This rule also applies to the draining or drying of an object you have dipped or coated.
( b ) What operations are covered? Examples of covered operations are paint dipping, electroplating, pickling, quenching, tanning, degreasing, stripping, cleaning, roll coating, flow coating, and curtain coating.
( c ) What operations are not covered? You are not covered by this rule if your dip-tank operation only uses a molten material (a molten metal, alloy, or salt, for example).
( d ) How are terms used in §§ 1910.123 through 1910.126 defined?
*Adjacent area* means any area within 20 feet (6.1 m) of a vapor area that is not separated from the vapor area by tight partitions.
*Approved* means that the equipment so designated is listed or approved by a nationally recognized testing laboratory, as defined by § 1910.7.
*Autoignition temperature* means the minimum temperature required to cause self-sustained combustion, independent of any other source of heat.
*Dip tank* means a container holding a liquid other than water and that is used for dipping or coating. An object may be immersed (or partially immersed) in a dip tank or it may be suspended in a vapor coming from the tank.
*Flammable liquid* means any liquid having a flashpoint at or below 199.4 °F (93 °C).
*Flashpoint* means the minimum temperature at which a liquid gives off a vapor in sufficient concentration to ignite if tested in accordance with the test methods in Appendix B to § 1910.1200—Physical Hazard Criteria.
*Lower flammable limit (LFL)* means the lowest concentration of a material that will propagate a flame. The LFL is usually expressed as a percent by volume of the material in air (or other oxidant).
*Vapor area* means any space containing a dip tank, including its drain boards, associated drying or conveying equipment, and any surrounding area where the vapor concentration exceeds 25% of the LFL of the liquid in the tank.
*You* means the employer, as defined by the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 651 *et seq.*).
[64 FR 13909, Mar. 23, 1999, as amended at 77 FR 17777, Mar. 26, 2012]
§ 91.1505 Repairs assessment for pressurized fuselages. ( a ) No person may operate an Airbus Model A300 (excluding the -600 series), British Aerospace Model BAC 1-11, Boeing Model 707, 720, 727, 737 or 747, McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8, DC-9/MD-80 or DC-10, Fokker Model F28, or Lockheed Model L-1011 airplane beyond applicable flight cycle implementation time specified below, or May 25, 2001, whichever occurs later, unless repair assessment guidelines applicable to the fuselage pressure boundary (fuselage skin, door skin, and bulkhead webs) are incorporated within its inspection program. The repair assessment guidelines must be approved by the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office for the type certificate for the affected airplane. ( 1 ) For the Airbus Model A300 (excluding the -600 series), the flight cycle implementation time is: ( i ) Model B2: 36,000 flights.
( ii ) Model B4-100 (including Model B4-2C): 30,000 flights above the window line, and 36,000 flights below the window line.
( iii ) Model B4-200: 25,500 flights above the window line, and 34,000 flights below the window line.
( 2 ) For all models of the British Aerospace BAC 1-11, the flight cycle implementation time is 60,000 flights.
( 3 ) For all models of the Boeing 707, the flight cycle implementation time is 15,000 flights.
( 4 ) For all models of the Boeing 720, the flight cycle implementation time is 23,000 flights.
( 5 ) For all models of the Boeing 727, the flight cycle implementation time is 45,000 flights.
( 6 ) For all models of the Boeing 737, the flight cycle implementation time is 60,000 flights.
( 7 ) For all models of the Boeing 747, the flight cycle implementation time is 15,000 flights.
( 8 ) For all models of the McDonnell Douglas DC-8, the flight cycle implementation time is 30,000 flights.
( 9 ) For all models of the McDonnell Douglas DC-9/MD-80, the flight cycle implementation time is 60,000 flights.
( 10 ) For all models of the McDonnell Douglas DC-10, the flight cycle implementation time is 30,000 flights.
( 11 ) For all models of the Lockheed L-1011, the flight cycle implementation time is 27,000 flights.
( 12 ) For the Fokker F-28 Mark 1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000, the flight cycle implementation time is 60,000 flights.
( b ) [Reserved]
[Doc. No. 29104, 65 FR 24125, Apr. 25, 2000; 65 FR 35703, June 5, 2000; 65 FR 50744, Aug. 21, 2000, as amended by Amdt. 91-266, 66 FR 23130, May 7, 2001; Amdt. 91-277, 67 FR 72834, Dec. 9, 2002; Amdt. 91-283, 69 FR 45941, July 30, 2004. Redesignated and amended by Amdt. 91-297, 72 FR 63410, Nov. 8, 2007; Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 91-350, 83 FR 9171, Mar. 5, 2018]
§ ̈¦15 

Created by the Malta Field Office in December 2012 Albers Equal Area, NAD83, Meters 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

HiLine District Office
 

Wind Energy

Development Potentials
 

Map shows the Develpment Potential for Wind Energy.

Development Potentials are based on Wind Power

Classifications. 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data

for individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by the BLM.

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed

through digital means and information may be updated without notification. 

A Allb be er rtta a Glacier

National Park 

Blackfeet Indian

Reservation 

S Sa as sk ka attc ch he ew wa an n

Browning 

GLACIER 

£¤89

Cut Bank LIBERTY HILL 

Shelby TOOLE £¤2 
 

Chester 

CHOUTEAU
 

232 

66
 £¤191

Fort Benton 

CCMMRRNNaattiioonnaall

WWiil

l

ddlliiffeeRReeffuuggee 

")

")

£¤87

BLAINE
 

Havre 

Chinook VALLEY
 

Malta

Rocky Boy's Ft. Belknap Indian Reservation Indian Reservation Glasgow

PHILLIPS 

0 25 50 100

Miles

1:1,500,000 

Map O.1 Development Potential RMP Boundary

High County

Moderate Interstate 

Low Highway or State Route 

Not Analyzed Town 

®
 

! H i L i n e R M P

Kalispell 

Great ! Falls 

! Lewistown

^ Helena

M

C

iles ! ! ity

Butte ! Billings
AFS-15-962-E 

April 5, 2016 

 Exemption No. 16065 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0780 

Mr. Chris Webb 

National Chief Flight Instructor 

American Flyers 

4659 Airport Parkway 

Addison, TX 75001 

Dear Mr. Webb: 

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our 

decision and explains its basis. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated March 26, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of American Flyers for an exemption from § 61.65(i) and (i)(4) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow American Flyers to use the 

American Flyers Precision Flight Controls (PFC) Model CR-12 and CR-12 ProPanel 

Advanced Aviation Training Devices (AATD) for a maximum credit of 20 hours for the 

instrument rating without a view-limiting device worn by an applicant when logging 

instrument time in an AATD. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because this is not a precedent-setting petition, and any delay in acting 

on this petition would be detrimental to American Flyer. 

The FAA issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 12096 (copy enclosed), the 

FAA found that the petitioner was not substantially different from other similar regulated 

entities that use AATDs for pilot training and experience requirements. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 
2 

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed Denial 

of Exemption No. 12096; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed Denial of Exemption No. 12096 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest. 

The FAA is cognizant of the recent increased capabilities of AATDs and is working to 

develop new rulemaking that would increase the regulatory allowances for AATD credit. This 

proposal was published in the Federal Register for public review and comment on June 16, 

2015 (Docket No.: FAA–2015–1846; Notice No.15–03, Aviation Training Device Credit for 

Pilot Certification). 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby deny the petition of American Flyers for an 

exemption from 14 CFR § 61.65(i) and (i)(4). 

Sincerely, 

//s// 

John S. Duncan 

Director, Flight Standards Service 

Enclosure 

Exemption No. 12096
#### UNITED STATES v. NORTHERN RAILWAY CO.

[Ante, p. 42;

302 U. S. 750]

Motion to remand and petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by Supreme Court November 22, 1937.
§ 15.214 How may a decision under this subpart be reconsidered? ( a ) While there is no appeal from the decision of the deciding official in regard to claims under the MPCECA, the deciding official may always reconsider his or her determination of a claim.
( b ) A claimant may request reconsideration from the deciding official by directing a written request for reconsideration to the deciding official within 60 days of the date of the original determination. The claimant must clearly state the factual or legal basis upon which he or she rests the request for a more favorable determination.
( c ) The determination upon the reconsideration will be provided to the claimant in writing by the deciding official.