alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 27.613 Material strength properties and design values. ( a ) Material strength properties must be based on enough tests of material meeting specifications to establish design values on a statistical basis.
( b ) Design values must be chosen to minimize the probability of structural failure due to material variability. Except as provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, compliance with this paragraph must be shown by selecting design values that assure material strength with the following probability— ( 1 ) Where applied loads are eventually distributed through a single member within an assembly, the failure of which would result in loss of structural integrity of the component, 99 percent probability with 95 percent confidence; and
( 2 ) For redundant structure, those in which the failure of individual elements would result in applied loads being safely distributed to other load-carrying members, 90 percent probability with 95 percent confidence.
( c ) The strength, detail design, and fabrication of the structure must minimize the probability of disastrous fatigue failure, particularly at points of stress concentration.
( d ) Design values may be those contained in the following publications (available from the Naval Publications and Forms Center, 5801 Tabor Avenue, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19120) or other values approved by the Administrator: ( 1 ) MIL-HDBK-5, “Metallic Materials and Elements for Flight Vehicle Structure”.
( 2 ) MIL-HDBK-17, “Plastics for Flight Vehicles”.
( 3 ) ANC-18, “Design of Wood Aircraft Structures”.
( 4 ) MIL-HDBK-23, “Composite Construction for Flight Vehicles”.
( e ) Other design values may be used if a selection of the material is made in which a specimen of each individual item is tested before use and it is determined that the actual strength properties of that particular item will equal or exceed those used in design.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424), sec. 6(c), Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-16, 43 FR 50599, Oct. 30, 1978; Amdt. 27-26, 55 FR 8000, Mar. 6, 1990]
#### Edward Winchester *et al. versus*Samuel Titcomb Junior, and Trustees.

Where it appears by die answer of a party summoned on a trustee process, that he is chargeable to some amount, at all events, he is to be adjudged trustee; the question to what amount he is chargeable, is not open in this stage of the cause, but is to be determined on *scire*facias, in case he shall not pay over on the execution against the effects in his hands, so much as the plaintiff shall consider him liable to pay.

In this case, after the arguments commenced before the full Court, it appeared, that at all events the trustees were chargeable, on their answer, to some amount, and that the only question to be considered was, to what amount. But the Court considered, that that question was not open, in this stage of the cause ; that the only judgment affecting the trustee would be, that he was chargeable on his answer ; that thereupon execution would be awarded against the effects of the principal in the hands of the trustee, and if the execution should not be otherwise satisfied, and the trustee should not *436pay over as much as the plaintiff considered him liable for, his remedy would be by *scire facias*against the trustee.

Marston, for the plaintiff.

Cushing, for the trustee.
exhibit103.htm


     

    Exhibit
10.3

    


    Summary
of Compensation Arrangement with George R. Cattermole

    


    For
serving as Interim Chief Executive Officer of Charles & Colvard, Ltd. (the
“Company”), George C. Cattermole will be compensated as an independent
contractor, at a value of $6,000 per week with 70% of such sum paid in cash on a
biweekly basis and 30% in restricted stock. The amount payable in restricted
stock will accrue and be payable in stock, vesting immediately, and valued as of
the close of the business day immediately prior to the appointment of a
permanent Chief Executive Officer for the Company.
[No. 46869-3-I.

Division One.

October 21, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Wayne V. Gillmere, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Whatcom County, No. 99-1-00344-9, Michael F. Moynihan, J., entered June 8, 2002. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
# Phantom-Maintenance

From DJI Wiki 

## Remove the Housing
◾ 1. Remove all the nuts and propellers by using the assistant wrench. ◾ 2. Remove the screws marked in the figure below using a Phillips Screwdriver and a Hexagon Screwdriver, and then remove the housing. Note:
◾ Please take good care of the removed parts, for example, screws. Make sure to keep them safe and away from children. ◾ DO NOT use any thread locker, since the thread locker may corrode the shell of Phantom, ma y cause fractures. Page 1 of 2 Phantom - Maintenance - DJI Wiki

4/ 19/2015 http://wiki.dji.com/en/index.php/Phantom - Maintenance

## Extension Power

There is an extension power cable in the Phantom for DIY use. The voltage from the Extens ion Power Cable is the same voltage as the power battery. The red cable is for positive and the grey c able is for negative. Make sure to keep the red cable and the grey cable separated, to avoid short circuit.

Retrieved from "http://wiki.dji.com/en/index.php?title=Phantom-Maintenance&oldi d=19862"

◾ This page was last modified on 22 March 2013, at 03:49. ◾ This page has been accessed 12,951 times. Page 2 of 2 Phantom - Maintenance - DJI Wiki

4/ 19/2015 http://wiki.dji.com/en/index.php/Phantom - Maintenance
§ 93.68 General rules: Seward Highway segment. ( a ) Each person operating an airplane in the Seward Highway segment shall operate that airplane at an altitude of at least 1,000 feet MSL unless maneuvering for a safe landing requires further descent.
( b ) Each person operating an aircraft at or below 1,200 feet MSL that will transition to or from the Lake Hood or Merrill segment shall contact the appropriate ATCT prior to entering the Seward Highway segment. All other persons operating an airplane at or below 1,200 feet MSL in this segment shall contact Anchorage Approach Control.
( c ) At all times, each person operating an aircraft above 1,200 MSL shall contact Anchorage Approach Control prior to entering the Seward Highway segment.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2016-044]

By letter dated May 8, 2000, Martha Bean, mediator working with the City of Tacoma and other parties on the relicensing of the Cowlitz River Project, filed on behalf of eight federal, state, and local agencies and the City of Tacoma, a request for an extension of time until July 15, 2000, to file protests and motions to intervene, and comments, recommendations, terms and conditions, and prescriptions,  as directed by the Commission's notice issued March 15, 2000, in the above-docketed project. The request for an extension of time included an Agreement in Principal (AIP) Regarding Passage, Production, Hatchery and Habitat, and Recreation for the Cowlitz Project that was supported by a majority of the agency participants in the relicensing process. In the motion, the parties request additional time for legal counsel to craft a final settlement document, based on the filed AIP.

Upon consideration, notice is hereby given that an extension of time for the filing of protests and motions to intervene, and final comments, recommendations, terms and conditions, and prescriptions is granted to and including July 15, 2000.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-12221  Filed 5-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4311 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4311

 To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to eliminate an administrative fee, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2020

 Mr. Daines (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, and Mr. Cramer) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to eliminate an administrative fee, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restoring State Mineral Revenues 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE FEE UNDER THE MINERAL LEASING 
              ACT.

    (a) In General.--Section 35 of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 
191) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), in the first sentence, by striking 
        ``, subject to the provisions of subsection (b),'';
            (2) by striking subsection (b);
            (3) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections 
        (b) and (c), respectively;
            (4) in subsection (b)(3)(B)(ii) (as so redesignated), by 
        striking ``subsection (d)'' and inserting ``subsection (c)''; 
        and
            (5) in subsection (c)(3)(A)(ii) (as so redesignated), by 
        striking ``subsection (c)(2)(B)'' and inserting ``subsection 
        (b)(2)(B)''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 6(a) of the Mineral Leasing Act for Acquired 
        Lands (30 U.S.C. 355(a)) is amended--
                    (A) in the first sentence, by striking ``Subject to 
                the provisions of section 35(b) of the Mineral Leasing 
                Act (30 U.S.C. 191(b)), all'' and inserting ``All''; 
                and
                    (B) in the second sentence, by striking ``of the 
                Act of February 25, 1920 (41 Stat. 450; 30 U.S.C. 
                191)'' and inserting ``of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 
                U.S.C. 191)''.
            (2) Section 20(a) of the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 (30 
        U.S.C. 1019(a)) is amended in the matter preceding paragraph 
        (1), in the second sentence, by striking ``the provisions of 
        subsection (b) of section 35 of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 
        U.S.C. 191(b)) and''.
            (3) Section 205(f) of the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty 
        Management Act of 1982 (30 U.S.C. 1735(f)) is amended by 
        striking the fourth, fifth, and sixth sentences.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**Certification**

 

The undersigned officer ofCapital Crossing Preferred Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies thatthe Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June30, 2002 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.  This certification is provided solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 
| Date: August 14, 2002 | By: /s/ RICHARD WAYNE                    |   |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  | Richard  Wayne                           |
|                  | President  (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 183

#### Editorial Note:

For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this part 183, see Amdt. 183-1, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

#### § 183.27 Designated aircraft maintenance inspectors.

A designated aircraft maintenance inspector (DAMI) may approve maintenance on civil aircraft used by United States military flying clubs in foreign countries.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Competitive Equality Banking Act of 1987

              														Competitive Equality Banking Act of 1987, August 10, 1987.						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1028,			accessed on August 23, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
§ 91.858 Special flight authorizations for non-revenue Stage 2 operations. ( a ) After December 31, 1999, any operator of a Stage 2 airplane over 75,000 pounds may operate that airplane in nonrevenue service in the contiguous United States only for the following purposes: ( 1 ) Sell, lease, or scrap the airplane;
( 2 ) Obtain modifications to meet Stage 3, Stage 4, or Stage 5 noise levels.
( 3 ) Obtain scheduled heavy maintenance or significant modifications;
( 4 ) Deliver the airplane to a lessee or return it to a lessor;
( 5 ) Park or store the airplane; and
( 6 ) Prepare the airplane for any of the purposes listed in paragraph (a)(1) thru (a)(5) of this section.
( b ) An operator of a Stage 2 airplane that needs to operate in the contiguous United States for any of the purposes listed above may apply to FAA's Office of Environment and Energy for a special flight authorization. The applicant must file in advance. Applications are due 30 days in advance of the planned flight and must provide the information necessary for the FAA to determine that the planned flight is within the limits prescribed in the law.
[Doc. No. FAA-2002-12771, 67 FR 46571, July 15, 2002, as amended by Docket FAA-2015-3782, Amdt. 91-349, 82 FR 46132, Oct. 4, 2017]
# EUR-Lex - 31996R0078 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996R0078

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 78/96 of 19 January 1996 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2742/90 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2204/90 **

*
Official Journal L 015 , 20/01/1996 P. 0015 - 0015 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 78/96 of 19 January 1996 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2742/90 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2204/90

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2204/90 of 24 July 1990 laying down additional general rules on the common organization of the market in milk and milk products as regards cheese (1), and in particular the second paragraph of Article 1 and the second subparagraph of Article 3 (3) thereof,

Whereas Article 4 (1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2742/90 (2), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1802/95 (3), fixes the sum due for the quantities of casein and/or caseinates used without authorization having regard to the prices for casein and caseinates recorded on the markets in the first half of 1992; whereas the upward trend in those prices during the year 1995 requires that sum to be reduced;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 4 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2742/90 is hereby replaced by the following:

'1. The sum due in accordance with Article 3 (3) of Regulation (EEC) No 2204/90 shall be ECU 183 per 100 kilograms of casein and/or caseinates, having regard to the price for casein and caseinates recorded on the markets in the second half of 1995.`

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 January 1996.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 201, 31. 7. 1990, p. 7.

(2) OJ No L 264, 27. 9. 1990, p. 20.

(3) OJ No L 174, 26. 7. 1995, p. 27.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1695

RICHARD W. DAVIS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EXXON COMPANY, USA; RICHARD HARVIN; JOHN BIAVASCHI, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-1471-A) Submitted: December 22, 1999 Decided: January 12, 2000 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kimberly L. Bradley, ABATO, RUBENSTEIN & ABATO, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Richard J. Hafets, PIPER & MARBURY L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland; Charles B. Wayne, PIPER & MARBURY L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court's order is marked as "filed" on April 16, 1999, the district court's records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on April 20, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the judgment or order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court's decision. See Wilson v. Murray , 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Richard W. Davis, Jr., appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in his former employer's favor in thisaction alleging age discrimination, retaliation, breach of contract, and defamation. We have reviewed the parties' briefs, the joint appendices, the supplemental appendix, and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Davis v. Exxon Company, USA, No. CA-98-1471-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 20, 1999.) * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 46 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 37
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 46

                           [Report No. 116-6]

             To repeal the Klamath Tribe Judgment Fund Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 8, 2019

Mr. Merkley (for himself and Mr. Wyden) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

                             March 13, 2019

               Reported by Mr. Hoeven, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To repeal the Klamath Tribe Judgment Fund Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Klamath Tribe Judgment Fund Repeal 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL.

    Public Law 89-224 (commonly known as the ``Klamath Tribe Judgment 
Fund Act'') (79 Stat. 897) is repealed.

SEC. 3. DISBURSEMENT OF REMAINING FUNDS.

    Notwithstanding any provision of Public Law 89-224 (79 Stat. 897) 
(as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act) 
relating to the distribution or use of funds, as soon as practicable 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 
shall disburse to the Klamath Tribe the balance of any funds that, on 
or before the date of enactment of this Act, were appropriated or 
deposited into the trust accounts for remaining legal fees and 
administration and per capita trust accounts, as identified by the 
Secretary of the Interior, under that Act (as in effect on the day 
before the date of enactment of this Act).
                                                        Calendar No. 37

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 46

                           [Report No. 116-6]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

             To repeal the Klamath Tribe Judgment Fund Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 13, 2019

                       Reported without amendment
```