alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 458 

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 

revise certain ethylene oxide emissions standards under the Clean Air 

Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2019 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Ms. DUCKWORTH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to revise certain ethylene oxide emissions 

standards under the Clean Air Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ETHYLENE OXIDE EMISSIONS STANDARDS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

5 date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the 

6 Environmental Protection Agency (referred to in this sec7 tion as the ‘‘Administrator’’) shall amend— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 458 IS

1 (1) subparts O and FFFF of part 63 of title 

2 40, Code of Federal Regulations, to revise the stand3 ards for the emission of ethylene oxide under those 

4 subparts based on the results described in the report 

5 of the National Center for Environmental Assess6 ment of the Environmental Protection Agency enti7 tled ‘‘Evaluation of the Inhalation Carcinogenicity of 

8 Ethylene Oxide’’ and dated December 2016; and 

9 (2) subpart O of part 63 of title 40, Code of 

10 Federal Regulations, to apply maximum achievable 

11 control technology (within the meaning of the Clean 

12 Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.)) requirements to 

13 chamber exhaust vents. 

14 (b) NOTIFICATION.— 

15 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after 

16 the Administrator learns of a violation of the stand17 ards revised under subsection (a), the Administrator 

18 shall notify the public of the violation in a manner 

19 determined to be appropriate by the Administrator. 

20 (2) FAILURE TO NOTIFY.—If the Administrator 

21 fails to notify the public under paragraph (1) by the 

22 end of the period described in that paragraph, the 

23 Inspector General of the Environmental Protection 

24 Agency shall carry out an investigation to deter25 mine— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 458 IS

1 (A) the reason or reasons for which the 

2 Administrator failed to notify the public; 

3 (B) the public health risks associated with 

4 the failure of the Administrator to notify the 

5 public; and 

6 (C) any steps the Administrator should 

7 take to ensure the Administrator meets the re8 quirements described in paragraph (1) in the 

9 future. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
§ 18.801 Definitions. ( a ) *Statement.* A *statement* is ( 1 ) an oral or written assertion, or
( 2 ) nonverbal conduct of a person, if it is intended by the person as an assertion.
( b ) *Declarant.* A *declarant* is a person who makes a statement.
( c ) *Hearsay. Hearsay* is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.
( d ) *Statements which are not hearsay.* A statement is not hearsay if: ( 1 ) *Prior statement by witness.* The declarant testifies at the hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is— ( i ) Inconsistent with the declarant's testimony, or
( ii ) Consistent with the declarant's testimony and is offered to rebut an express or implied charge against the declarant of recent fabrication or improper influence or motive, or
( iii ) One of identification of a person made after perceiving the person; or
( 2 ) *Admission by party-opponent.* The statement is offered against a party and is— ( i ) The party's own statement in either an individual or a representative capacity, or
( ii ) A statement of which the party has manifested an adoption or belief in its truth, or
( iii ) A statement by a person authorized by the party to make a statement concerning the subject, or
( iv ) A statement by the party's agent or servant concerning a matter within the scope of the agency or employment, made during the existence of the relationship, or
( v ) A statement by a co-conspirator of a party during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-93,354-02

IN RE STATE OF TEXAS E X REL. BRENT S MITH, Relator

ON AP P LICATION FOR WR IT OF P ROHIBIT ION IN THE 345 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF TRAV IS COUNTY

T H Per curiam . O R D E R R el at o r filed a motion for leave to file and a petition for writ of prohibition invoking our constitutional a

uthority to issue writs of prohibition in criminal law matters. T E X . C O N S T . art. V, § 5. The petition reque sts that this Court prohibit the Respondent from issuing and ruling on pre- trial habea s applications filed by defe n d an t s co n fi ned in Kinney County pursuant to Kinney County misdemeanor c harg es. We order that this petition be filed and set for submissi on to deter mine: (1) whether , under Ex parte Valdez , or other authority , the district court has a minist eria l duty to abstain from issuing 1 writ s that arise from actions occur ring in a distant county ; (2) whether , under Ex parte Valdez, or

489 S.W .3d 462 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016). 12

other authority , the di strict court has a mi nisterial dut y to abstain from de ciding the m erits of writ applications that arise from actions occur ring in a distant county ; and (3) whether it would be a clea r abuse of discretion to hold that Tex as Code of Criminal Procedur e article 11.06 applies to misdemeanor case s, g iven that indictments are not require d in misdemeanor case s. The Relator and the Real Parties in I ntere st shall brief these issues. We also invit e t h e T ra v i s County District Attorney ’s Office, the Offic e of the S tate P rosec uting Attorney , and the Responde nt to brief these issues. All briefs shall be f iled with this C ourt within thirty day s from the da te of this order

.
Filed: May

4, 2022 Do not publish
Exhibit 13.2





PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Annual Report of Ultrapetrol (Bahamas) Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard J. Hoskinson, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: March 14, 2013





/s/ Leonard J. Hoskinson


Leonard J. Hoskinson


Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 2 

FILED UNDER SEAL 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3497-2 Filed:07/12/18 Entered:07/12/18 19:58:03 Desc:

Exhibit 2 - Filed Under Seal Page 1 of 1
Unassociated Document


    
      

      

    

    
      

      

    

    EXHIBIT
10.7

    


    


    


     

    


    


    FORM
OF SERIES B PREFERRED STOCK

    CERTIFICATE
OF

    PHYSICIANS
HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    
 

    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    [Corporate
Logo]

    


     

    
      	 	 	 	 
	Certificate
      Number  	 	 	Shares
	 	 	 	 
	 PAR VALUE
      $0.001	 	 	
              PREFERRED
      STOCK

              SERIES
      B

            


    

     

     

    THIS
CERTIFIES
THAT                                                                SPECIMEN

    


    FULLY PAID AND NON-ACCESSIBLE SHARES OF
THE PREFERRED STOCK PAR VALUE OF $0.001 EACH OF PHYSICIANS HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT
GROUP, INC. TRANSFERABLE ON THE BOOK OF COPRORATION IN PERSON OR BY DULY
AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY UPON SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE PROPERLY
ENDORSED.  THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT VALID UNTIL COUNTERSIGNED BY THE
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTERED BY THE REGISTRAR.

    


    WITNESS
THE FACSIMILE SEAL OF THE CORPORATION AND THE FACSIMILE SIGNATURES OF ITS DULY
AUTHORIZED OFFICERS.

    


     

    
      	 	 	DATED:
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
              RICHARD
      E. GOULDING, MD

                  Secretary   

            	 	
              COUNTERSIGNED AND
      REGISTERED:

              ISLAND STOCK
      TRANSFER

              Transfer
      Agent        

            
	 	 	 


    

     

     

    
      	ROBERT L.
    TRINKA   	Authorized
      Signature       
	    President	100 Second Avenue
      South, Suite 300N, St. Petersburg, FL 33701
	 	727.289.0010


    

     

     

    [CORPORATE
SEAL]
§ 18.31 Privacy protection for filings and exhibits. ( a ) *Redacted filings and exhibits.* Unless the judge orders otherwise, in an electronic or paper filing or exhibit that contains an individual's social-security number, taxpayer-identification number, or birth date, the name of an individual known to be a minor, or a financial-account number, the party or nonparty making the filing must redact all such information, except: ( 1 ) The last four digits of the social-security number and taxpayer-identification number;
( 2 ) The year of the individual's birth;
( 3 ) The minor's initials; and
( 4 ) The last four digits of the financial-account number.
( b ) *Exemptions from the redaction requirement.* The redaction requirement does not apply to the following: ( 1 ) The record of an administrative or agency proceeding;
( 2 ) The official record of a state-court proceeding;
( 3 ) The record of a court or tribunal, if that record was not subject to the redaction requirement when originally filed; and
( 4 ) A filing or exhibit covered by paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Option for filing a reference list.* A filing that contains redacted information may be filed together with a reference list that identifies each item of redacted information and specifies an appropriate identifier that uniquely corresponds to each item listed. The reference list must be filed under seal and may be amended as of right. Any reference in the case to a listed identifier will be construed to refer to the corresponding item of information.
( d ) *Waiver of protection of identifiers.* A person waives the protection of paragraph (a) of this section as to the person's own information by filing or offering it without redaction and not under seal.
( e ) *Protection of material.* For good cause, the judge may order protection of material pursuant to §§ 18.85 and 18.52.
#### SOROCHAK v REED (2 Cases)

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9205.

Decided November 26, 1928

A. W. Bell, Esq., Cleveland, for Sorochak.

Anthony F. Gaughan, Esq., Cleveland, for Reed.

VICKERY, J.

The trouble of it is this is upon an immaterial matter. The question was not whether an electric light pole was there, .but whether this man saw this accident, and bringing out where this electric light pole was located was simply dragged out by the cross-examination. Apparently the witness thought he had to account for the fact that he was looking that way, so the contradiction was upon an immaterial point, for it did not matter whether the electric light pole was there or not; the question was whether this man saw the accident, ,and there is testimony that the accident did occur at this place.. The boys, on cross-examination, admitted that the accident did not happen on Starkweather Avenue but some distance up the street, so examining this whole record, we do not see that the court did anything wrong in refusing to grant a new trial on this petition after term; at least we cannot say that the court violated his oath of office and was guilty of an abuse of discretion.

If we understand the rule, either on motion during term or on petition after term where a verdict can be set aside and a new trial ordered on the ground of newly discovered evidence, the new evidence must be of such character that had it been before the jury, the jury must • almost of necessity have found the other way. Taking *424all the newly discovered evidence in this case, even if the record had shown that due diligence had been observed, we do not think it amounts to anything, more than adding more evidence upon the same issue that was presented by both sides of the case as it was originally tried. In other words, it was merely cumulative and so far as rebuttal was concerned, it was upon a question which was not material.

Having gone over the whole record, we cannot see our way clear to disturb this verdict. There is no substantial error in the charge of the court nor is the verdict so manifestly against the weight of the evidence that wé would be warranted in reversing the case.

The judgments in both cases are, therefore, affirmed.

Sullivan, PJ, and Levine, J, concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sorell, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Bon Kwan Koo,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1. the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:     May 20, 2006                  /s/Bon Kwan Koo
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Bon Kwan Koo, President and
                                         Chief Executive Officer
633 A.2d 855

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION of MARYLAND, v. Bernard P. KOLE.

Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 50,

Sept. Term, 1993.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Dec. 6, 1993.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Consent to Disbarment from the practice of law filed by Bernard P. Kole, in accordance with Maryland Rule BV 12d2, and the written recommendation of Bar Counsel, it is this 6th day of December, 1993

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Bernard P. Kole be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Bernard P. Kole from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule BV13, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.
#### HARPER v. WRIGHT BROTHERS.

(Decided December 1, 1916.)

Appeal from Tuscaloosa County Court.

Heard before Hon. A. B. Foster.

No counsel marked for appellant.

Verner & Rice and J. H. Beal, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
#### Smith *v.*The State.

Crime.

(Decided May 18, 1916.

71 South. 979.)

Criminal Law; Sentence; Cost. — Under §§ 7620, 7635, it was proper to sentence to hard labor for the county where the punishment imposed did not exceed two years, notwithstanding an additional sentence to hard labor was imposed for the payment of costs.

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. Wm. E. Fort.

Ramsey Smith was convicted of crime, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, and H. G. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, for the .State. ■

BROWN, J.

The term of imprisonment imposed as a punishment for the offense not exceeding two years, the sentence to hard labor for the county was proper (Code 1907, § 7620) ; and this is true, notwithstanding an additional sentence to hard labor was imposed for the payment of the costs.—Code 1907, § 7635; *Evans v. State,*109 Ala. 12, 19 South. 535.

The record and proceedings of the trial court appearing in all things regular and free from error, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
§ 1404.3 Administrative responsibilities. ( a ) *Director.* The Director of FMCS has responsibility for all aspects of FMCS arbitration activities and is the final agency authority on all questions concerning the Roster and FMCS arbitration procedures.
( b ) *Office of Arbitration.* The Office of Arbitration (OA) maintains the Roster; administers subpart C of this part (Procedures for Arbitration Services); assists, promotes, and cooperates in the establishment of programs for training and developing new arbitrators; and provides names or panels of names of listed arbitrators to parties requesting them.
( c ) *Arbitrator Review Board.* The Arbitrator Review Board (Board) shall consist of a chair and members appointed by the Director who shall serve at the Director's pleasure. The Board shall be composed entirely of full-time officers or employees of the Federal Government and shall establish procedures for carrying out its duties. ( 1 ) *Duties of the Board.* The Board shall: ( i ) Review the qualifications of all applicants for listing on the Roster, interpreting and applying the criteria set forth in § 1404.5;
( ii ) Review the status of all persons whose continued eligibility for listing on the Roster has been questioned under § 1404.5;
( iii ) Recommend to the Director the acceptance or rejection of applicants for listing on the Roster, or the withdrawal of listing on the Roster for any of the reasons set forth in this part;
( iv ) At the request of the Director, or upon its own volition, review arbitration policies and procedures, including all regulations and written guidance regarding the use of Roster arbitrators, and make recommendations regarding such policies and procedures to the Director.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  23 LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended
June  30,  2004,  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the  undersigned,
Robert  P.  Johnson, President of AEI Fund Management XXI,  Inc.,
the  Managing Member of the Company, and Patrick W. Keene,  Chief
Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc., each certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              August 10, 2004



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              August 10, 2004
EXHIBIT
      32.1


CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of FTS Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief
      Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 3(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
            Scott
                GallagherBy:
            Scott GallagherChief
                Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer
              December
                8, 2006
----

| 1) | Profits Dreams Development      Limited, a company set up and validly constituted under the laws of      British Virgin Islands, with registered office Room 1508-1509 Peninsula      Square, 18 Sung On Street, HungHom, Kowloon (hereinafter referred      to as “Company A”); and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) | Best Paramount Industrial      Limited, a company set up and validly constituted under the laws of      Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, with registered office 2/F, Emax, Hong Kong      International Trade and Exhibition Centre, No. 1 Trademart Drive, Kowloon      Bay, Kowloon (hereinafter referred to as “Company    B”). |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

| SIGNED      by                                               | )                         |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|
| for      and on behalf of Profits Dreams Development Limited | )                         |
|                                                         | in      the presence of:- | ) |
|                                                         |                      |   |
|                                                         |                      |   |
|                                                         |                      |   |
|                                                         |                      |   |
| SIGNED      by                                               | )                         |
| for      and on behalf of Best Paramount Industrial Limited  | )                         |
|                                                         | in      the presence of:- | ) |

----
#### § 91.108 xxx

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 67849, Aug. 22, 2024.