alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2010-0040 Directorate Identifier: 2008-NM-203-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 0.3 $ 25.50 $0 $ 25.50 611 $15,580.50

Replacement 0.7 $ 59.50 $0 $ 59.50 611 $36,354.50

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $51,935

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
§ 31.47 Burners. ( a ) If a burner is used to provide the lifting means, the system must be designed and installed so as not to create a fire hazard.
( b ) There must be shielding to protect parts adjacent to the burner flame, and the occupants, from heat effects.
( c ) There must be controls, instruments, or other equipment essential to the safe control and operation of the heater. They must be shown to be able to perform their intended functions during normal and emergency operation.
( d ) The burner system (including the burner unit, controls, fuel lines, fuel cells, regulators, control valves, and other related elements) must be substantiated by an endurance test of at least 40 hours. Each element of the system must be installed and tested to simulate actual balloon installation and use. ( 1 ) The test program for the main blast valve operation of the burner must include: ( i ) Five hours at the maximum fuel pressure for which approval is sought, with a burn time for each one minute cycle of three to ten seconds. The burn time must be established so that each burner is subjected to the maximum thermal shock for temperature affected elements;
( ii ) Seven and one-half hours at an intermediate fuel pressure, with a burn time for each one minute cycle of three to ten seconds. An intermediate fuel pressure is 40 to 60 percent of the range between the maximum fuel pressure referenced in paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section and minimum fuel pressure referenced in paragraph (d)(1)(iii);
( iii ) Six hours and fifteen minutes at the minimum fuel pressure for which approval is sought, with a burn time for each one minute cycle of three to ten seconds;
( iv ) Fifteen minutes of operation on vapor, with a burn time for each one minute cycle of at least 30 seconds; and
( v ) Fifteen hours of normal flight operation.
( 2 ) The test program for the secondary or backup operation of the burner must include six hours of operation with a burn time for each five minute cycle of one minute at an intermediate fuel pressure.
( e ) The test must also include at least three flameouts and restarts.
( f ) Each element of the system must be serviceable at the end of the test.
[Doc. No. 1437, 29 FR 8258, July 1, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 31-2, 30 FR 3377, Mar. 13, 1965; Amdt. 31-7, 61 FR 18223, Apr. 24, 1996; 61 FR 20877, May 8, 1996]
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

I, Mark F. Travis, the principal accounting officer of Intrepid Capital
Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A Amendment No. 1 of the
Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the Periodic Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: October 10, 2003

By:
    /s/ Mark F. TravisMark F. Travis, principal accounting officer


23
§ 102.60 Petitions. ( a ) *Petition for certification or decertification.* A petition for investigation of a question concerning representation of employees under paragraphs (1)(A)(i) and (1)(B) of Section 9(c) of the Act (hereinafter called a petition for certification) may be filed by an employee or group of employees or any individual or labor organization acting in their behalf or by an employer. A petition under paragraph (1)(A)(ii) of Section 9(c) of the Act, alleging that the individual or labor organization which has been certified or is being currently recognized as the bargaining representative is no longer such representative (hereinafter called a petition for decertification), may be filed by any employee or group of employees or any individual or labor organization acting in their behalf. Petitions under this section shall be in writing and signed, and either shall be sworn to before a notary public, Board agent, or other person duly authorized by law to administer oaths and take acknowledgments or shall contain a declaration by the person signing it, under the penalty of perjury, that its contents are true and correct (see 28 U.S.C. 1746). One original of the petition shall be filed, and a copy served on all parties named in the petition. A person filing a petition by facsimile pursuant to § 102.5(e) shall also file an original for the Agency's records, but failure to do so shall not affect the validity of the filing by facsimile, if otherwise proper. A person filing a petition electronically pursuant to § 102.5(c) need not file an original. Except as provided in § 102.72, such petitions shall be filed with the Regional Director for the Region wherein the bargaining unit exists, or, if the bargaining unit exists in two or more Regions, with the Regional Director for any of such Regions. A certificate of service on all parties named in the petition shall also be filed with the Regional Director when the petition is filed. Along with the petition, the petitioner shall serve the Agency's description of the procedures in representation cases and the Agency's Statement of Position form on all parties named in the petition. Prior to the transfer of the record to the Board, the petition may be withdrawn only with the consent of the Regional Director with whom such petition was filed. After the transfer of the record to the Board, the petition may be withdrawn only with the consent of the Board. Whenever the Regional Director or the Board, as the case may be, approves the withdrawal of any petition, the case shall be closed.
( b ) *Petition for clarification of bargaining unit or petition for amendment of certification.* A petition for clarification of an existing bargaining unit or a petition for amendment of certification, in the absence of a question of representation, may be filed by a labor organization or by an employer. Where applicable the same procedures set forth in paragraph (a) of this section shall be followed.
[84 FR 69588, Dec. 18, 2019]
#### § 91.193 Certificate of authorization for certain Category II operations.

The Administrator may issue a certificate of authorization authorizing deviations from the requirements of §§ 91.189, 91.191, and 91.205(f) for the operation of small aircraft identified as Category A aircraft in § 97.3 of this chapter in Category II operations if the Administrator finds that the proposed operation can be safely conducted under the terms of the certificate. Such authorization does not permit operation of the aircraft carrying persons or property for compensation or hire.
# EUR-Lex - 31996R1159 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996R1159

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1159/96 of 26 June 1996 establishing the forecast supply balance for 1996/97 for the Azores, Madeira and the Canary Islands with regard to sugar, provided by Council Regulations (EEC) No 1600/92 and (EEC) No 1601/92 **

*
Official Journal L 153 , 27/06/1996 P. 0031 - 0032 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1159/96 of 26 June 1996 establishing the forecast supply balance for 1996/97 for the Azores, Madeira and the Canary Islands with regard to sugar, provided by Council Regulations (EEC) No 1600/92 and (EEC) No 1601/92

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1600/92 of 15 June 1992 concerning specific measures for the Azores and Madeira relating to certain agricultural products (1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2537/95 (2), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1601/92 of 15 June 1992 concerning specific measures for the Canary Islands with regard to certain agricultural products (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2537/95, and in particular Articles 3 (4) and 7 (2) thereof,

Whereas pursuant to Article 2 of Regulations (EEC) No 1600/92 and (EEC) No 1601/92, Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2177/92 (4), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 439/96 (5), sets the forecast supply balance with sugar to the Azores, Madeira and the Canary Islands for the 1995/96 marketing year; whereas pursuant to the said Article 2 and on the basis of the forecasts the supply balance for the 1996/97 marketing year under the arrangements should now be set;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 2177/92 is hereby replaced for the 1996/97 marketing year by the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 1996.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 June 1996.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 173, 27. 6. 1992, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 260, 31. 10. 1995, p. 10.

(3) OJ No L 173, 27. 6. 1992, p. 13.

(4) OJ No L 217, 31. 7. 1992, p. 71.

(5) OJ No L 61, 12. 7. 1996, p. 1.

ANNEX

Quantities of sugar expressed in terms of tonnes of white sugar, referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EEC) No 2177/92 for the 1996/97 marketing year

>TABLE>
#### METROPOLITAN SAV & LN CO v GLOVER et

Ohio Appeals, 7th Dist, Mahoning Co

Decided March 22, 1929

A M Henderson and W P Heasley, both of Youngstown, for Sav & Ln Co.

Barnum, Hammond, Stevens, Patchin & Hoyt, Youngstown, for Glover.

FARR, J.

Upon an examination of the record it is disclosed that no motion for a new trial was filed before the Referee. It becomes important, therefore, to determine the effect of the failure to file such motion. The section of the General Code of importance here is 11478.

Further assistance would not be needed other than the statute in question. However a case of interest in this connection is that of Hanner v. Brewing Company, et al., 8 O. D., 399, in which the statute just read was construed, and it is a case worthy of notice here. The second proposition of the syllabus reads as follows:

> “When exceptions to a Referee’s report will be overruled. Exceptions to a Referee’s report will be overruled when no motion for a new trial was made before the Referee and no bill of exceptions taken.”

So that it becomes readily apparent that if the parties excepting in the instant case desired to have these findings reviewed, it was necessary to make a motion for a new trial before the referee and to have his finding upon the same.

No motion or motions were filed in the instant case. For the reasons given it follows that the exceptions must be overruled, the report of the Referee approved and a judgment entered thereon.

Pollock and Roberts, JJ, concur.
§ 61.185 Aeronautical knowledge. ( a ) A person who is applying for a flight instructor certificate must receive and log ground training from an authorized instructor on: ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the fundamentals of instructing, including: ( i ) The learning process;
( ii ) Elements of effective teaching;
( iii ) Student evaluation and testing;
( iv ) Course development;
( v ) Lesson planning; and
( vi ) Classroom training techniques.
( 2 ) The aeronautical knowledge areas for a recreational, private, and commercial pilot certificate applicable to the aircraft category for which flight instructor privileges are sought; and
( 3 ) The aeronautical knowledge areas for the instrument rating applicable to the category for which instrument flight instructor privileges are sought.
( b ) The following applicants do not need to comply with paragraph (a)(1) of this section: ( 1 ) The holder of a flight instructor certificate or ground instructor certificate issued under this part;
( 2 ) The holder of a current teacher's certificate issued by a State, county, city, or municipality that authorizes the person to teach at an educational level of the 7th grade or higher; or
( 3 ) A person employed as a teacher at an accredited college or university.
[Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16298, Apr. 4, 1997; Amdt. 61-103, 62 FR 40907, July 30, 1997]
#### § 29.1142 Auxiliary power unit controls.

Means must be provided on the flight deck for starting, stopping, and emergency shutdown of each installed auxiliary power unit.

(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424), sec. 6(c), Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))

[Amdt. 29-17, 43 FR 50602, Oct. 30, 1978]
```

[113th Congress Public Law 123]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 1377]]

Public Law 113-123
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to install in the area of the 
 World War II Memorial in the District of Columbia a suitable plaque or 
   an inscription with the words that President Franklin D. Roosevelt 
 prayed with the United States on D-Day, June 6, 1944. <<NOTE: June 30, 
                          2014 -  [S. 1044]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: World War II 
Memorial Prayer Act of 2013. 40 USC 8903 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``World War II Memorial Prayer Act of 
2013''.
SEC. 2. PLACEMENT OF PLAQUE OR INSCRIPTION AT WORLD WAR II 
                    MEMORIAL.

    The Secretary of the Interior--
            (1) shall install in the area of the World War II Memorial 
        in the District of Columbia a suitable plaque or an inscription 
        with the words that President Franklin D. Roosevelt prayed with 
        the United States on June 6, 1944, the morning of D-Day;
            (2) shall design, procure, prepare, and install the plaque 
        or inscription referred to in paragraph (1); and
            (3) may not use Federal funds to prepare or install the 
        plaque or inscription referred to in paragraph (1), but may 
        accept and expend private contributions for this purpose.
SEC. 3. <<NOTE: Applicability.>> COMMEMORATIVE WORKS ACT.

    Chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code (commonly known as the 
``Commemorative Works Act''), shall apply to the design

[[Page 128 STAT. 1378]]

and placement of the plaque within the area of the World War II 
Memorial.

    Approved June 30, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1044 (H.R. 2175):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113-500 (Comm. on Natural Resources) accompanying 
H.R. 2175.
SENATE REPORTS: No. 113-141 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            June 5, considered and passed Senate.
            June 23, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 375.19 Nature of privilege conferred.

The provisions of this part, and of any permit issued hereunder, together with 49 U.S.C. 41703, are designed, among other purposes, to carry out the international undertakings of the United States in the Chicago Convention, in particular Article 5. That article gives foreign aircraft the privilege of “taking on or discharging passengers, cargo or mail” subject to the right of the State where such embarkation or discharge takes place to impose such regulations, conditions or limitations as it may consider desirable. The U.S. Congress by the 1953 amendment to section 6 of the Air Commerce Act of 1926, now designated as 49 U.S.C. 41703, authorizes the Department to permit such operations only where conditions of reciprocity and the interest of the public in the United States are met. Thus, the operator of any foreign registered aircraft is not entitled as a matter of right to the issuance, renewal or freedom from modification or change in a permit issuable pursuant to this authority. Accordingly, any authority conferred by this part may be withheld, revoked, amended, modified, restricted, suspended, withdrawn, or canceled by the Department in the interest of the public of the United States, without notice or hearing.

[OST Doc. No. 42547, 51 FR 7254, Mar. 3, 1986, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15940, Apr. 16, 2019]
#### §§ 100.512-100.529 [Reserved]
§ 102.72 Filing petition with general counsel: investigation upon motion of general counsel; transfer of petition and proceeding from region to general counsel or to another region; consolidation of proceedings in same region; severance; procedure before general counsel in cases over which the general counsel has assumed jurisdiction. ( a ) Whenever it appears necessary in order to effectuate the purposes of the Act, or to avoid unnecessary costs or delay, the General Counsel may permit a petition to be filed with him/her in Washington, DC, or may, at any time after a petition has been filed with a Regional Director pursuant to § 102.60, order that such petition and any proceeding that may have been instituted with respect thereto: ( 1 ) Be transferred to and continued before him/her, for the purpose of investigation or consolidation with any other proceeding which may have been instituted in a Regional Office or with him/her; or
( 2 ) Be consolidated with any other proceeding which may have been instituted in the same region; or
( 3 ) Be transferred to and continued in any other region, for the purpose of investigation or consolidation with any proceeding which may have been instituted in or transferred to such region; or
( 4 ) Be severed from any other proceeding with which it may have been consolidated pursuant to this section.
( b ) The provisions of §§ 102.60 to 102.71, inclusive, shall, insofar as applicable, apply to proceedings before the general counsel pursuant to this section, and the powers granted to regional directors in such provisions shall, for the purpose of this section, be reserved to and exercised by the general counsel. After the transfer of any petition and any proceeding which may have been instituted in respect thereto from one region to another pursuant to this section, the provisions of this subpart shall, insofar as applicable, govern such petition and such proceedings as if the petition has originally been filed in the region to which the transfer was made.
( c ) The Regional Director may exercise the powers in paragraphs (a)(2) and (4) of this section with respect to proceedings pending in his/her Region.
[32 FR 9550, July 1, 1967, as amended at 82 FR 43698, Sept. 19, 2017]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-02-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-29-2000
<CASH>                                          66,754
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  111,566
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,231
<INVENTORY>                                      4,103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               183,687
<PP&E>                                          43,903
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,790
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 281,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          125,052
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           182
<OTHER-SE>                                     146,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   281,756
<SALES>                                        275,677
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               275,677
<CGS>                                          260,778
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  272,908
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 627
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,396
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,483
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,913
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,913
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11


</TABLE>
#### Gertrude Beider, an Infant, by Sophie Beider, Her Guardian ad Litem, et al., Respondents, *v.*Union of American Hebrew Congregations, Appellant.

(Argued May 27, 1936;

decided July 8, 1936.)

*426
      *William E. Lyons*and *Barnett Cohen*for appellant.

*Cecil B. Ruskay, Harry B. Epstein, Stephen A. Yeghiaian*and *Joseph A. Ruskay*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Lqughran and Finch, JJ.; Lehman, J., taking no part.