alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31996R0376 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996R0376

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 376/96 of 29 February 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 897/94 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 as regards pilot projects relating to continuous position monitoring of Community fishing vessels **

*
Official Journal L 051 , 01/03/1996 P. 0031 - 0031 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 376/96 of 29 February 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 897/94 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 as regards pilot projects relating to continuous position monitoring of Community fishing vessels

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2870/95 (2), and in particular Article 3 (4) thereof,

Whereas under the terms of Council Decision 95/528/EC of 5 December 1995 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 and Decision 89/631/EEC as regards the time limit for implementing certain pilot projects on continuous position monitoring of Community fishing vessels and the Community contribution to the expenditure incurred in their implementation (3), the date of the completion of the pilot projects undertaken by the Member States, as well as that of the final Council decision concerning the application of the system of continuous location of the Community fishing vessels, set out in Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93, were deferred by six months;

Whereas it is advisable consequently also to extend for a further six months the corresponding dates provided for in Commission Regulation (EC) No 897/94 (4);

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Fisheries and Aquaculture,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 897/94 is amended as follows:

1. in Article 2 (3), '30 June 1995` shall be replaced by '31 December 1995`;

2. in Article 7 (1), '31 December 1995` shall be replaced by '30 June 1996`;

3. in Article 11, '31 August 1995` shall be replaced by '29 February 1996`.

Article 2

This Regulation enters into force the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 February 1996.

For the Commission

Emma BONINO

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 261, 20. 10. 1993, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 301, 14. 12. 1995, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 301, 14. 12. 1995, p. 35.

(4) OJ No L 104, 23. 4. 1994, p. 18.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4701 

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 

with respect to future interstate designations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2020 

Mr. GARDNER (for himself and Mr. CORNYN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency 

Act of 1991 with respect to future interstate designations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ports-to-Plains High5 way Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FUTURE INTERSTATE DESIGNATION AND OPER7 ATION. 

8 (a) INCLUSION OF CERTAIN ROUTE SEGMENTS ON

9 INTERSTATE SYSTEM.—Section 1105(e)(5) of the InterVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:59 Oct 15, 2020 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4701.IS S4701

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4701 IS

1 modal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 

2 (Public Law 102–240; 109 Stat. 597; 118 Stat. 293; 129 

3 Stat. 1422; 133 Stat. 3018) is amended— 

4 (1) in subparagraph (A), in the first sentence— 

5 (A) by inserting ‘‘subsection (c)(14)(A)(ii) 

6 (relating solely to the portion from Limon to I– 

7 76 in the vicinity of Brush),’’ after ‘‘subsection 

8 (c)(13),’’; and 

9 (B) by inserting ‘‘subsection (c)(38),’’ 

10 after ‘‘subsection (c)(37),’’; and 

11 (2) in subparagraph (C)(i), by adding at the 

12 end the following: ‘‘A State having jurisdiction over 

13 any segment of the routes referred to in subsection 

14 (c)(14)(A)(ii) (relating solely to the portion from 

15 Limon to I–76 in the vicinity of Brush) or (c)(38) 

16 shall erect signs, as appropriate and approved by the 

17 Secretary, identifying such segment as a future ad18 dition to the Interstate System.’’. 

19 (b) VEHICLE WEIGHT LIMITATIONS.—Section 127 of 

20 title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

21 end the following: 

22 ‘‘(v) OPERATION OF VEHICLES ON CERTAIN TEXAS, 

23 OKLAHOMA, COLORADO, AND NEW MEXICO HIGHWAYS.— 

24 If any segment of the routes referred to in paragraph 

25 (14)(A)(ii) (relating solely to the portion from Limon to 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4701 IS

1 I–76 in the vicinity of Brush) or paragraph (38) of section 

2 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Effi3 ciency Act of 1991 (Public Law 102–240; 105 Stat. 2032; 

4 114 Stat. 2763A–202; 119 Stat. 1210) is designated as 

5 a route on the Interstate System, a vehicle that could op6 erate legally on that segment before the date of such des7 ignation may continue to operate on that segment, without 

8 regard to any requirement under this section.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual report of Gateway Distributors, Ltd. (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard  A. Bailey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

     1.     The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     6.     The  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                      /s/ Richard A. Bailey
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Richard A. Bailey, Chief Financial Officer
                                      and Chief Executive Officer
                                      Date: July 25, 2005


<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 457 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.457

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                                 An Act

 
To require that $1 coins issued during 2019 honor President George H.W. 
Bush and to direct the Secretary of the Treasury to issue bullion coins 
                  during 2019 in honor of Barbara Bush.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``President George H.W. Bush and First 
Spouse Barbara Bush Coin Act''.
SEC. 2. COINS HONORING PRESIDENT GEORGE H.W. BUSH AND FIRST SPOUSE 
BARBARA BUSH.
    (a) Circulating $1 Coins Honoring President George H.W. Bush.--
Notwithstanding subsections (d), (n)(2)(E), (n)(3), (n)(4), and (n)(8) 
of section 5112 of title 31, United States Code, in addition to the 
coins to be issued under subsections (r) and (w) of such section 5112, 
and in accordance with the other provisions of subsection (n) of such 
section 5112, the Secretary of the Treasury, beginning on January 1, 
2020, shall mint and issue $1 coins that bear--
        (1) the image of President George H.W. Bush; and
        (2) an inscription of the year ``2020''.
    (b) Bullion Coins Honoring First Spouse Barbara Bush.--
Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (5)(C) of section 5112(o) of title 
31, United States Code, and in accordance with the other provisions of 
such section 5112(o), the Secretary of the Treasury, beginning on 
January 1, 2020, shall mint and issue bullion coins that bear--
        (1) the image of First Spouse Barbara Bush; and
        (2) an inscription of the year ``2020''.
SEC. 3. FINANCIAL ASSURANCES.
    The Secretary of the Treasury shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to ensure that the minting and issuing of coins under this 
Act will not result in any net cost to the United States Government.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### § 1602.56 Investigation of reporting or recordkeeping violations.

When it has received an allegation, or has reason to believe, that a person has not complied with the reporting or recordkeeping requirements of this part or of part 1607 of this chapter, the Commission may conduct an investigation of the alleged failure to comply.

[56 FR 35756, July 26, 1991]
Peabody Energy

Request for amendments to FAA 333 UAS exemption

Exemption No. 14013

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–4259

Contact:

Joel Davis

Peabody Energy

5995 North McDonnell Blvd.

St. Louis, MO 63134-2058

314.683.8292
Date: January 22, 2016

Exemption No. 14013

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–4259

To whom it may concern:

Peabody Energy is requesting an amendment to the existing 333 exemption as listed and

described below. The purpose for the amendment is to be able to offer the services as listed in the

existing 333 exemption. The amendment will better serve to increase the functionality and

usefulness of additional UASs and the increased functionality will serve to create safer working

environments in the industries in which they are deployed.

1. Additional Aircraft

Peabody Energy would like to add an additional UAS to the existing exemption No.14013. The new

aircraft is the DJI Inspire 1.

Manufacturer: DJI

The addition of the DJI UAS listed above would not affect the existing 333, where public interest and

safety were the basis for granting the original exemption. The DJI Inspire 1 

meets all the existing requirements noted by the FAA.

The user manual will be emailed directly to 333exemptions@faa.gov.
#### WILLIAMS v STATE.

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co.

No. 9735.

Decided Dec. 17, 1928.

R T Mills, Cleveland, for Williams.

E A Picciano, Cleveland, for State.

VICKERY, J.

The main error urged is that the indictment did not state an offense within the meaning of the statutes of Ohio and that a demurrer to the indictment which was made should have been sustained, but was overruled, to which ruling an exception was taken. Evidence was introduced and plaintiff in error, the defendant below, did not cross examine any of the witnesses, nor did he get on the witness stand himself, nor did he put any witness upon the witness stand, so the record as it stands is unchallenged and it is a record which is amazing, and we do not wonder that the defendant did not get upon the witness stand. Perhaps fifty years ago the purely technical grounds upon which this reversal is urged might have been heeded, but we have gone a long ways 'from that proposition and 'courts are not inclined to re-' verse cases because of mere superficial technicalities when justice has been done in the main by the decision of the courts. In this case no one can come to any conclusion but that the plaintiff in error was guilty of the grossest indecency and then blackmailed his victim to the extent of $2700 or more; and he did it so boldly and so brazenly that it is almost inconceivable that such a thing could happen in a City like Cleveland. There is no doubt from this record that the plaintiff in error got only what was coming to him, and the record shows, without any equivocation, or without any mitigating circumstances that he induced the prosecuting witness to commit the felony with him and on him, and then used this as a basis for exacting-money from his dupe.

We do not see that there is any error in this record that will warrant us in reversing the case. The judgment will, therefore, be affirmed.

Sullivan, P J and Levine, J, concur.-
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4821 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to clarify that utility line 

technicians qualify as emergency response providers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 20 (legislative day, OCTOBER 19), 2020 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to clarify 

that utility line technicians qualify as emergency response providers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROVIDERS. 

4 Section 2(6) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 

5 (6 U.S.C. 101(6)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘includes Federal’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘includes— 

8 ‘‘(A) Federal’’; 

9 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert10 ing ‘‘; and’’; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4821 IS

1 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(B) utility line technicians responding to 

3 a major disaster or an emergency declared by 

4 the President under section 501 of the Robert 

5 T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency As6 sistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5191).’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
**Complete the follow ing tables for each sampling point** 

**Plant Name Sample** 

**Collection Number**  **Date of Sample**

**Collection Sample Collection**  **Time Temperature (°C)**  **pH (S.U.)**  Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4

**Plant Name Sample** 

**Collection Number**  **Influent Samples**

**Collected as Grabs**  **(Yes or No) Mercury and Cyanide** 

**Samples Collected as Grabs**  **(Yes or No) Bioreactor Influent** 

**and Bioreactor Effluent Samples**  **Collected as 24-Hour Composites**  **(Yes or No) Tyvek Suits**  **used (Yes or No)**  **Dust Masks**

**Used for Mercury**  **(Yes or No) Clean Hands/Dirty** 

**Hands Sampling Techniques Used**  **(Yes or No) Description of Sample** 

**Collection Technique (if different than**  **instructions)** Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4**Description of A bnormal** 

**Conditions in FGD System or FGD Wastew** **ater Treatment System that May**  **Impact Concentrations Complete the following tables based on the plant operating characteristics during each set of samples collected** 

**Units Operating During Sampling**  **Day Units Off-line** 

**Entire Sampling Day**  **SCRs/SNCRs**

**Operating on Units**  Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4

**Flow Rate (gpm) Duration**  Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4

**Lime Usage (tons)**  **Ferric Chloride**

**Usage (Liters/day)**  **Organosulfide Usage**

**(Liters/day) Polymer Usage** 

**(Liters/day) Acid Usage** 

**(Liters/day) Chemical** 

**Precipitation System**  **Effluent Flow Rate (gpd)**  **Dilution Water**

**Addition Prior to Biological**  **Treatment System**  **(gpd) Biological** 

**Treatment System**  **Effluent Flow Rate (gpd)**  Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 **FGD Wastewater Treatment Operation During Sample Collection**

**Plant Name Date of Sample**  **Collection Sample**  **Collection Number**  **Scrubber Purge Flow Rate During**  **Influent Sample Collection**  **(gpm) Plant Name**  **Date of Sample Collection**  **Sample Collection**  **Number Plant Operation During Sample Collection** 

**Percent Hydroclone Overflow Recycled**  **Back to Scrubber Plant Name**  **Sample**

**Collection Number**  **Date of Sample**

**Collection Scrubber Slurry Blowdown Flow**  **Rate Scrubber**  **Slurry Percent Solids**  **Plant Operation During Sample Collection**

### Unit 1 **Unit 2 Unit 3**  **Unit 4 Daily Power Generation (MW-hrs)**  **Plant Name Date**  **Provide the daily power generation for each scrubbed unit starting two weeks prior to the first set of samples through the last set of samples**

### Unit 5

## Chemical **Precipitation Effluent**  **Dilution Water**

**Ad dition Prior to**  **Biological Treatment**  **System Biological Treatment** 

**System Effluent Plant Name**  **Date FGD Wastewater Treatment System Flow Rates**  **(gpd) Provide the average flow rate in the FGD wastewater treatment system for each stream included in the**  **table starting two weeks prior to the first set of samples through the last set of samples**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0243

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ZECHARIAH JUSTIN DANIEL SMITH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 13, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 5 2022

12/05/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0243
§ 15.304 Are there limits to claims for loss of or damages to personal property under the WIA? ( a ) Only claims involving damage or loss to personal property that occurred while at the Job Corps Center or while on authorized travel, training or other authorized activities may be considered under the WIA.
( b ) The Job Corps will only reimburse up to $300.00 per item for claims for loss or damage of personal property under the WIA, up to a maximum of $1,500 per occurrence.
( c ) If the property in question is not of a type that the student is authorized to bring to the Job Corps Center, no compensation will be made under this subpart. For example, if the Job Corps Center has explicit written rules imposing limitations on the type of electronic equipment or other personal items such as jewelry that may be brought to the center, no compensation will be awarded for the loss or damage of such property.
#### Mary Hicks, *Plaintiff in*Error, *v.*The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

The evidence amply supports the verdict.

This case was decided by Division A.

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Hernando • County.

*63The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

Cr. *G. Martin,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Park Trammell,*Attorney General, for State.

Cockrell, J.

— For killing Allen Little, Mary Hicks was convicted of murder in the second degree, under an indictment charging murder in the first degree, and upon a writ of error to the life sentence imposed she assigns the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.

She asserts here that the evidence so overwhelmingly supports her claim of self-defense, the jury must have been led by something outside to find such verdict. We fail, however, to so read the evidence; on the contrary, we find ample to sustain the verdict, and follow the trial judge in refusing to interfere with it.

Judgment affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Shackleford, J., concur;

Taylor, Hocker *and*Parki-iill, J. J., concur in the opinion.
EXHIBIT 32

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Virginia corporation (the Company), for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such
officers knowledge, that:



|1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in the Report.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 4, 2008 |  | /s/ Michael E. Campbell
|                      |  | Michael E. Campbell    
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      | 
|Dated: August 4, 2008 |  | /s/ Steven C. Giuliano 
|                      |  | Steven C. Giuliano     
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Arch Chemicals, Inc.
and will be retained by Arch Chemicals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE> 1

                                                                 EXHIBIT 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                               -----------------


      The undersigned, a director of Kellwood Company (the "Company"), does
hereby constitute and appoint Thomas H. Pollihan his/her true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him/her and in his/her name, place and stead, to sign the
Company's Form 10-K Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 as Amended for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1997, and
to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto the
attorney-in-fact full power and authority to sign such document on behalf of
the undersigned and to make such filing, as fully to all intents and purposes
as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that the attorney-in-fact, or his substitutes, may lawfully do
or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Dated:      May 29, 1997


/s/ Raymond F. Bentele             /s/ James C. Jacobsen
-------------------------------    --------------------------------
Raymond F. Bentele                 James C. Jacobsen



/s/ Edward S. Bottum               /s/ James S. Marcus
-------------------------------    --------------------------------
Edward S. Bottum                   James S. Marcus



/s/ Kitty G. Dickerson             /s/ William J. McKenna
-------------------------------    --------------------------------
Kitty G. Dickerson                 William J. McKenna



/s/ Leonard A. Genovese            /s/ Hal J. Upbin
-------------------------------    --------------------------------
Leonard A. Genovese                Hal J. Upbin



/s/ Jerry M. Hunter                /s/ Fred W. Wenzel
-------------------------------    --------------------------------
Jerry M. Hunter                    Fred W. Wenzel