alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### AMERICAN HARDWOOD LUMBER CO., Appellant, v. R. K. DENT, Respondent.

St. Louis Court of Appeals,

March 5, 1912.

The opinion of the Springfield Court of Appeals in this ease (151 Mo. App. 614) is adopted as the opinion of the court.

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit *Court.*— Son. *Robert M. Foster,*Judge.

Reversed and remanded.

*Julius T. Muench*for appellant.

*Pearce, Davis <$> Gurlee*for respondent.

*443PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this case was prosecuted to this court, bnt was thereafter transferred hy it to the Springfield Court of Appeals under the provisions of the act of the Legislature, approved June 12, 1909. [See Laws of Missouri 1909, p. 396; see, also, Sec. 3939, R. S. 1909.] In due time the cause was disposed of by the Springfield Court of Appeals through an opinion prepared hy Judge Cox of that court, as will appear hy reference to American Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Dent, 151 Mo. App. 614, 132 S. W. 320. Subsequently, the Supreme Court declared the said legislative act, whioh purported to authorize the transfer of cases from this court to the Springfield Court, to he unconstitutional. The cause was thereafter transferred hy the Springfield Court of Appeals to this court on the theory that the jurisdiction of the appeal continued to reside here and the proceedings had in the Springfield Court with reference thereto were *coram non judice.*

The case has been argued and submitted here and duly considered. Hpon reading the record and considering the arguments, we are persuaded that the opinion of the Springfield Court, above referred to, properly disposes of the controversy, and it is adopted as the opinion of this court. For the reasons given in that opinion the judgment should he reversed and the canse remanded. It is so ordered.

All concur.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Herbert Lindo, certifythat:

 

1.                  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Kof Kenilworth Systems Corporation;

 

2.                  Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements are made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.                  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report;

 

4.                  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)                Designed such disclosure controls and procedures orcaused such disclosure controls to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

 

b)               Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)                Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.                  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)                All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)               Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: March 12,2010 | By:    | /s/ Herbert Lindo                     |
|-------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                          |   | Chairman and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

***Remainder of page intentionally left blank***

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4892 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4892

To amend title 54, United States Code, to provide that State law shall 
   apply to the use of motor vehicles on roads within a System unit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 10, 2020

    Mr. Lee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 54, United States Code, to provide that State law shall 
   apply to the use of motor vehicles on roads within a System unit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF STATE LAW APPLICABLE TO THE USE OF MOTOR 
              VEHICLES ON ROADS WITHIN A SYSTEM UNIT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 1015 of title 54, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 101513. State law
    ``(a) Definitions.--In this section:
            ``(1) Off-highway vehicle.--The term `off-highway vehicle' 
        shall be defined by the State in which the applicable System 
        unit is located, in accordance with the law of the State.
            ``(2) Road.--The term `road' means the main-traveled 
        surface of a roadway open to motor vehicles that is owned, 
        controlled, or otherwise administered by the Service.
    ``(b) Applicable Law.--The law of the State in which a System unit 
is located shall apply to the use of motor vehicles (including off-
highway vehicles) on roads within a System unit.
    ``(c) Violations.--Violating a provision of State law applicable to 
a System unit under subsection (b) shall be prohibited in the 
applicable System unit.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The analysis for subchapter II of chapter 
1015 of title 54, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 
the following:

``101513. State law.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
23.1





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
The Knot, Inc. of our report dated March 12, 2009, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of The Knot, Inc., included in the 2008 Annual
Report to Shareholders of The Knot, Inc.





Our
audits also included the financial statement schedule of The Knot, Inc. listed
in the Index at Item 15. This schedule is the responsibility of The Knot, Inc.’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, as to which the date is March 12, 2009, the financial statement
schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements:





(1)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-74398) of The Knot, Inc.,


(2)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-96179) of The Knot, Inc.,


(3)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-41960) of The Knot, Inc.,


(4)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-113824) of The Knot, Inc.,


(5)
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-111060) of The Knot, Inc.,


(6)
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-124177) of The Knot, Inc.,


(7)
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-135877) of The Knot, Inc.,
and


(8)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-141275) of The Knot, Inc.





of our
report dated March 12, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of The Knot, Inc. incorporated herein by reference, our report dated
March 12, 2009, with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of The Knot, Inc., included herein, and our report included
in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule of
The Knot, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of The Knot, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2008.









New York,
New York


March 12,
2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<NAME>                        Lexon, Inc.
<CIK>                         0001062679
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         10,041
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,703
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               23,806
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 248,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          347,849
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6,810
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   248,413
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,394,320
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,318
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,355,804)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,355,804)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.36)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dov Baharav, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Amdocs Limited;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) [Not applicable]

     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: December 28, 2005

/s/ Dov Baharav
---------------------------------------------------------
Dov Baharav
Chief Executive Officer
Amdocs Management Limited
#### THOMPSON Exr. v. GUSLER et

Ohio Appeals, 3rd Dist, Paulding Co

No 53.

Decided July 9, 1929

Walters & Hanlin, Van Wert, for Thompson.

F. P. Spriggs, Paulding, for Gusler.

HUGHES, J.

Under and by virtue of Article 4, Section 7 of the Constitution, when a majority vote of the people has been taken, these t"*o courts, to wit,' the probate court and the court of common pleas, shall be combined and shall be known as the court of common pleas. After this vote has been taken, there is but one court, the court of common pleas, and there can be no "’^h thing as an appeal taken from a judgment entered in one division of that court, to the court itself. There is no longer a probate court in Paulding county. It is a court of common pleas, with the same jurisdiction that the probate court of that countv formerly had.

For these reasons, the judgment is affirmed.

Before Judges Hughes, Justice & Crow.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4494 

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend the period with 

respect to which amounts under the Coronavirus Relief Fund may be 

expended. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 6, 2020 

Ms. HASSAN (for herself and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend 

the period with respect to which amounts under the 

Coronavirus Relief Fund may be expended. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State and Local 

5 Coronavirus Relief Fund Extension Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4494 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION. 

2 Section 601(d)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 

3 U.S.C. 801(d)(3)) is amended by striking ‘‘December 30, 

4 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2021’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
§ 63.53 Knowledge requirements. ( a ) An applicant for a flight navigator certificate must pass a written test on— ( 1 ) The regulations of this chapter that apply to the duties of a flight navigator;
( 2 ) The fundamentals of flight navigation, including flight planning and cruise control;
( 3 ) Practical meteorology, including analysis of weather maps, weather reports, and weather forecasts; and weather sequence abbreviations, symbols, and nomenclature;
( 4 ) The types of air navigation facilities and procedures in general use;
( 5 ) Calibrating and using air navigation instruments;
( 6 ) Navigation by dead reckoning;
( 7 ) Navigation by celestial means;
( 8 ) Navigation by radio aids;
( 9 ) Pilotage and map reading; and
( 10 ) Interpretation of navigation aid identification signals.
( b ) A report of the test is mailed to the applicant. A passing grade is evidence, for a period of 24 months after the test, that the applicant has complied with this section.
[Doc. No. 1179, 27 FR 7970, Aug. 10, 1962, as amended by Amdt. 63-19, 43 FR 22639, May 25, 1978]
#### TAX COMMISSION v HIRSCH

Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist, Hamilton Co

No. 3220.

Decided February 4, 1929

Messrs. Edward C. Turner, Columbus, Clarence A. Dorger, and Wm. H. Middleton, Jr., Waverly. for Tax Commission.

*735Messrs. Moulinier, Bettman & Hunt, Cincinnati, for Hirsch.

EPITOMIZED OPINION

Bequest to trustees for daughter, with provision that her share shall vest in her husband if he survives her, son-in-law takes only a contingent remainder, subject to being defeated by his death prior to that of his wife. Hence, such bequest must be taxed in accordance with 5343 GC. Therefore, the rate by which such bequest must be taxed is not that fixed by 5334 GC., par. 3, nor 5335 GC., par. 3, as the “son of a daughter,” but by 5335 GC., par. 3, without exemptions.

Opinion by

ROSS, J.

HAMILTON, P. J., and CUSHING, J., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.30

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                       EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:

         The undersigned Delaware corporation, for the purpose of amending its
Restated Certificate of Incorporation as filed on April 29, 1968, and lastly
amended on March 25, 1996, as provided by Section 242 of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware, hereby certifies:

         1.       That the name of the Corporation is:

                       EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

         2.       The date of filing of its original Certificate of
                  Incorporation with the Secretary of State was August 23, 1965,
                  which was restated and amended on April 29, 1968, and
                  subsequently amended June 24, 1968, August 29, 1977, December
                  8, 1986, and March 25, 1996.

         3.       That Article Fourth is hereby amended to read in its entirety
                  as follows:

                           "FOURTH: The aggregate number of shares of all
                           classes of stock which the corporation shall have
                           authority to issue is 8,000,000 shares, each of the
                           shares having a par value of $0.20, all of which
                           shares shall be Common Stock."

         4.       All other provisions of the Restated Certificate of
                  Incorporation not amended hereby shall remain unchanged and in
                  full force and effect.

         This Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation was set
forth in a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors which declares the
adoption of the Amendment to be advisable and which ordered that the Amendment
be considered by the stockholders of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon at
the annual meeting held on July 2, 2002.

         Such Amendment was duly adopted in accordance with Section 242 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware by approval of the holders of a
majority of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of the
Corporation.

<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION has caused
its corporate seal to be affixed hereto and the Amendment to be signed by its
President and Secretary this 15th day of July, 2002.

                                             EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

ATTEST:

By /s/ W. Curtis Fossett                    By /s/ Randall W. White
   -----------------------------                ------------------------------
   W. Curtis Fossett, Secretary                 Randall W. White, President
§ 15.201 Where should the MPCECA claim be filed? ( a ) If the claimant's official duty station is at the Department's national office in Washington, DC, or if the claim is for an amount in excess of $25,000, the claim should be filed with the Counsel for Claims and Compensation, Office of the Solicitor of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor, Suite S4325, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC, 20210.
( b ) In all other cases, the claimant shall address the claim to the regional or branch office of the Office of the Solicitor servicing the claimant's official duty station.
§ 1603.209 Filing and service. ( a ) Unless otherwise ordered by the administrative law judge, a signed original of each motion, brief, or other document shall be filed with the administrative law judge, with a certificate of service indicating that a copy has been sent to all other parties and stating the date and manner of service. Digitally submitted documents may be electronically signed. All documents presented in hard copy shall be on standard size (81 ⁄ 2 x 11) paper. Each document filed shall be clear and legible.
( b ) Filing and service shall be made by first class mail or other more expeditious means of delivery, including, at the discretion of the administrative law judge, by facsimile, digital transmission, or other means. The administrative law judge may exercise discretion to limit the number of pages that may be filed or served by facsimile. Service shall be made on a party's representative or, if not represented, on the party.
( c ) Every document shall contain a caption including the parties' names, the complaint number or docket number assigned to the matter, a designation of the type of filing (*e.g.,* motion, brief, etc.), and the filing person's signature and contact information.
[89 FR 47853, June 4, 2024]