Comment#­

Porter., Stacy 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

S ubject: 

l?/l 

Mike Brady [mikee.bunch@sbcglobal.net] 

Thursday. January 25. 2007 7:57 PM 

soliver@mp.usbr.gov 

cschmidt@folsom .ca.us 

Folsom Dam Safety Project- Folsom Point Closing 

-::.:.>.:·Jr= :f ;:>.:J:': �:3.n.j ::-:�..;,:; · :):: ::.::�· �..,�="'"ll·: -c�:= ':l-'·-·"' :, ::m1 ir rt·.·:::-e ::: e:':·::r " -:·: "1 

r::=:=""narl.: 1� -:.r:-�a,. ·f-. �:':11 � :i"� :. �. P�::---:3.- i .. n -.: ��,.:; :;: "'= i�T-" r' :;n- , e'·S:;l i 1: '=tL·-=1·' r: "".i .. . lJ· 

�:: =t�i-41 ?' . . !'i":"ii. � .. ;r_- t-J.�-- �a ii1�h =�;les. hiqd"t;.::; : :. '::..:!:.i 3.�� csseL' � .· -·r �-r :.ii-tt.:.j f·-.

--;� 

J.<Llg f 1� _.:.- l � -�:.::3:' ::m tl �:::: ·t, ur.ls-.33 :: ·: -=�· .:>:.::_:·. J:-:�t prc.:·23.S .._[ : - '-:.:.:,? .:L "'J �-:jJ:":dti·. -=2 

::tf'::l mi-:.i.la::..:.n,J ::E:nn.i.:-:.:..nJ O>tf�cr:.:; L; Eol __ \· �·.:

 • .:0:.011i'"l :t":s. se:::1e . 

j �. � -: ·-. ,? 1 •.-1, .:. � s, f j .. id � n 3. .J. - c L. n 5- _ �-� � _ "= .-: :.i. _ r. f _ .; - � .: i �. � -:

 - ,. -:..:., a!·. J I � _ !': i. :r ? -'= . r -� 1 i. � :. � ;! r ·::

 

:.:_k-: ::lr::..ij· 

:=:;o.; :i;:lrtl�-; 

r:>.:.:�am, ...

··. 
Comment #• t l-·"Z:, 

Porter, Stacy 

F rom: Kathy Boyd [kabin ternet@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 6:23 PM 

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov 

Subject: Folsom Point Closure 

Page I of I 

First the government closed the dam bridge. bringing huge traffic problems and a wallop financially to 

our Old Town. Now the government wants to close Folsom Point for 6-7 yrs! For heaven's sake, I don't 

believe there are absolutely no sites that will work besides closing our recreation accesses; in fact, 

according to Sreve Miklos. you won't even consider other sites that don't involve closing Folsom Point. 

Perhaps you didn't realize how heavily used these l ake accesses are. While I understand the need to 

upgrade the dam. and appreciate the -.vork you do for all of us. pl ease tind a way to do so without closing 

Folsom Point. 

Thank you. 

Kathy Boyd 

Folsom. CA 95630 

Don't get soaked. Take a qt•id� p�ak al the lor�.:casl 

with the\' :�IH1�'! Senn.:h \\ eul her s�1ortcut. 

I :26 :2lJII"' 
Comment I#W J 'Z '{ 

Porter, Stacy 

From: colldeweih [colldeweih@comcast.net] 

Sent: Thursday. January 2 5. 2007 10:09 PM 

To: usbr; usbr; us army corp 

Subject: folsom point closure 

Page I of I 

I am writing to you in regards to the proposed closure of Folsom point boat l aunch/picnic area .We are avid 

boaters and users of Folsom point 

boat l aunch/picnic area and would prefer other alternatives be explored. 

We as a citizens of Folsom understand the importance of fiood protection and support the retrofit project. 

I am deeply concerned that the proposed closure would negatively impact the City of Folsom .both financially and 

in added traffic congestion 

that this cities infrastructure can not handle. People who would normally use Folsom point would have to find 

alternative facilities around the l ake thereby stressing already overwhelmed l aunch/picnic areas. Closing this area 

would cost this area hundreds if not thousands of tourist dollars. This city can not afford to take another financial 

hit such as the one d ealt by the post 9/1 1 closure of the d am road. 

6-7 years is way to long a time to keep this area closed. I urge you to consider the other possible alternatives that 

have been placed on the table . 

· 

Thank you for your consideration in this matter. 

The Col ldeweihs 

Folsom residents and users of Folsom point for 20+ years 

I �h �007 
Comment #01' lt-5' 

Porter, Stacy 

From: n d [ndwork2@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Thursday. J anuary 2 5, 2007 9:30 PM 

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov 

S ubject: Folsom Dam Construction Project 

Dear: Mr. Oliver 

Page I of I 

I am writing to express my strong opposition to any plan to use the area known as MIAD (N. of 

Green Valley Rd, E. of Natoma) for any staging, construction, rock crushing and any like 

activity regarding the Folsom Lake Dam construction project. 

I am a resident of Folsom CA and live in the foothills community of Empire Ranch which is 

across from Green Valley Rd. and Mormon Island. The noise levels are already extremely 

high from normal road activity 24 hours a day. As noted in the current Executive Summary, 

noise levels will increase to unacceptable levels. This valley is shaped like a bowl, so noise 

would travel without being muted. 

Also, the prevailing wind comes out of the north blowing across the current structure. In 

addition to ·carrying' the noise further distances. A potentially greater issue or threat to this 

family community is the exposure to asbestos and other construction dust and debris and the 

health problems these will create now and in the future. 

In closing, the option would be unacceptable and would likely lead to considerable resident 

disruption and legal activity. 

Please feel free to call me. 

Thank you. 

Mr. Neely Downing 

1522 Freswick Drive 

Folsom Ca 95630 

916-739-7525 

1 �s 21Hl7 
Comment #l&'l

 j?, (J 

Porter, Stacy 

From: ROCKYSFANS@aol.com 

Sent: Thursday, J anuary 2 5. 2007 9:12 PM 

To: soliver@mp usbr.gov 

Subject: Do NOT close Folsom Point 

Dear Mr. O liver. 

Page I of I 

Please do NOT close Folsom Point. I'm sure you could find another alternative for your construction staging 

area. The merchants of Folsom have already been hurt by the closure of the Dam Road. Now, more 

merchants near Folsom Point will also be hurt. 

Folsom Point is also used by a lot of families who enjoy spending the day swimming and picnicking at the lake. 

It is very convenient. If you close it, then we would have to go to Beals' Point and boaters would have to go 

either to the Marina in El Dorado Hills or Granite Bay. This is a big inconvenience especially during the warm 

months as you would be closing a boat launch which would cause more traffic on the boat ramps at Granite 

Bay and the Marian. 

So not only merchants will be hurt, but the boaters and families who enjoy going to this side of Folsom Lake will 

also be effected. 

Thank you. 

David and Patty Soulsby 

121 Timson Dr 

Folsom. 95630 

916-852-4651 

1 26 2007 
Comment IH� 111' 

Porter, Stacy 

From: Mike the Poolman [water@mikethepoolman.com] 

Sent: Thursday. January 25. 2007 8:32 PM 

To: soliver@mp.usbr. gov; Rebecca .A. Victorine@usace. army. mil 

Subject: Folsom Point 

Folsom has suffered enough due to lhe Dam Road dosufe. 

Page I of I 

Please don't make It worse for our economy, 11ome values and clllldren's trafl1c safety by closing Folsom Point. 

Sinoerely, 

Mike Sllnson 

Mike lhe Paolman 

bttp;//www.MlkeThePoolmartcom 

CS3·731809 
Comment #ltl

 /l f 

Porter, Stacy 

F rom: MaaBiake@aol.com 

Sent: Friday. J anuary 26. 2007 1:14 AM 

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov 

Subject: DO NOT CLOSE FOLSOM POINT 

Dear Mr. Oliver: 

Page I of I 

Have you ever been to Folsom Lake on a hot summer weekend--and I 'm not talking holidays. The picnic tables 

are full; the lines at the boat ramps are long. It doesn't make any difference which part of the lake you go to or 

what time, it's busy. 

Close Folsom Point and the State is going to be losing money. It's just going to be too difficult to get to the 

Lake. Folsom Point is used by numerous families who enjoy spending the day swimming and picnicking at the 

lake. It is very convenient for us who live on this side of the lake. If you close it, then we have to drive through 

town to use Beals' Point. Boaters would have to go either to the M arina in El Dorado Hills or once again, 

through town to Granite Bay. This is a big i nconvenience especially during the warm months as you would be 

closing a boat lau nch which would cause more traffic on the boat ramps at Granite Bay and the M arina. 

Please do NOT close Folsom Point. An alternati ve for your construction s taging area could be the area on the 

Dam Road which the government h as already closed and m ade traffi c in Folsom a nightmare. The merchants 

of Folsom have already been hurt by this closure. 

Marianne P. Blake 

130 Price Way 

Folsom 

I 26 2007 
Comment #lit ( '! "\ 

Chan, Allison 

From: Stephen_Paladino@KeyBank.com 

Sent Thursday. January 18, 20 07 1 :50 PM 

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov: m finnegan@mp.usbr.gov 

Cc: malaea99@comcast. net 

Subject: Folsom Point Closure - Folsom, CA 

Page I of l 

I'm very disappointed that there has been any serious consideration given to the closure ofthe subject 

recreational area for dam and/or dike repair. This would have a devastating impact on recreation 

throughout northern CA, and Folsom commerce and home values. Furthennore. this would be adding 

insult to injury after Fol s om residents and businesses have had to endure the highly detrimental 

consequences of the Dam Road closure following 91l. There simply has to be a better alterative because 

the c Iasure of Folsom Point for any extended period of time (beyond 30 days) is completely 

unacceptable for any reason whatsoever. 

Steve Paladino 

Commercial Relationship Manager and Folsom Resident 

Key AutoFinance 

Oftice: 916-351-9467 

Cellular: 916-747-2913 

Fax: 216-357-6114 

: r ..:. : = m.• .; . J i r; J : j � r m ::1 � • ·• , r: - -, • n r -J - I .,. : � :-n· 

•. ::r --" r.o:r .. io: .I � l..,J. 

.

' ;· :� .-= :":; ::· ·.i'<-:

 -; ..iJL-" � ,-- . � · 'i 

!'.:!·--f _ , .f -:f.� ..

 ;,L:Cl �J,._j' t.J: -1t1 ...

. 

- { � If. � :=: 

_:: ' •. .=_rq ;;:.1· f ! .. � . .c �>1· i · .. _

.- ;o;u �..:. · · .-=-·! 

I � , I .l.

 t [ �.. . 

� l12::1a_ ,:;..:n:::o;t :.he se;Ll6r .:.:nmdJl- e�� ::!n I J-3t:'_1 •.b- 'il"'·-�:.-:;1 L, �:."! e::� !.:�1 :·, 

··:he.:r.e: ele L!':O!'!.i.C :: l.:tJ.i 1-:!· .:.�J .- rrr . :.I:-.;.iO;. ;rt::: :.):H:c;.ln �.cm:!t!.:

:.:..: ;')·�'::-

.:.nr:-::-:nat:ca �rr.n.�· ..:�r...: l!f,., .. , 3'1l l-j�r. - ' ol-:. :·-e�·r· . !1.:; ::r tr·.: 

.=::3:J :.e:i.; -�li.i�/ A,;-:. y�·• rn�:· n)�. i ··�-- 'J - .- i�--i'··->-.;-t·; t""'u--=- -!' :.;

·,:,.,-· -3'"-

::';.;c.- .r:-r:-,tj -h-:.n _ -- th.., _,.::"ll'�G.s : £ ·,.·� ·'-, 

:\. 

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . ...

. ..

 ,. . .

. . ... .. ... . .. ..... . . - .... .

. ... .... .. ... . . . . . ..

... . .

.. . 

-- �:- --.:·r--- .: •• -·;: _j 

- . J . !:.--.:

- ;;: I l.l'-

I ) 2 2\.!l)l 
Comment��- I �0 

Chan, Allison 

From: odell5@comcast.net 

Sent: Thursday. January 18. 2007 1 :02 PM 

To: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov: soliver@mp.usbr.gov 

Cc: rebecca.a. victorine@usace.army.mil 

Subject: Folsom Point Closure- URGENT 

To Whom It May Concern: 

We strongly object to the proposed closure of folsom Point State Recreation Area! 

Page I of I 

This proposition is unacceptable to the citizens of Folsom and su rrounding comm unities. Folsom Point 

is used by thousands of comm unity mem bers throughout the year for walking, biking. running, 

boatingand picnicing. its closure \-VOuld be an outrage. Folsom Point is the 

only a ccess to Folsom Lake in the City of Folsom . 

Please consider alternative solutions, as closing Folsom Point is absolutely 

unacceptable. 

On a a more personal note, we, like many families chose to relocate to Folsom primarily because of the 

proximimity and accesability to Folsom Lake. 8 years ago when my husband was transfered to the bay 

area. we knew we didn't want to raise our family there. We had the choice to live anywhere within 2 

hours of the Oakland a irport, and we CHOSE FOLSOM BECAUSE OF THE LAKE! Only after that 

did we realize that Folsom had other great a spects such as our schools, etc. However, had it not been for 

the lake there are other great comm unities with these other factors. Also. our home is located in the 

development directly a cross the street, once considered one of the most desireable in Folsom. The 

closure and activity planned for this a rea is going to effect our property values tremendously. 

We haven't even brought up the impact will it will have on the next closest a ccess to the lake at Browns 

Ravine .... you'll be hearing from El Dorado Hills next. 

This decision will affect the lives of many families like mine. who not only enjoy this lake throughout 

the yea r. but \vant to continue u sing summers on the lake to strengthen our families and creating 

m emories for our children. 

PLEASE CONSIDER ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS! 

Thank you. 

Gary & Lia Odell 

176 Singer Lane 

Folsom. CA 95630 
Comment #. I :; l 

Chan, Allison 

From: ninapucci@comcast.net 

Sent: Thursday. J anuary 18. 2007 11:33 AM 

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov 

Subject: Folsom Point closer 

To Whom it may concern, 

Page 1 ot· I 

I deeply oppose the Folsom Point Boat Launch being closed to build the bridge. I live right across 

from Folsom Point a nd the workers will basically be in my backyard. I do nor want to hear the noisy 

trucks and have people looking into my backyard. Why can't you use the Folsom Dam Road exit where 

there are no residents besides the prisoners. I think the prisoners deserve to listen to the noise instead of 

me. 

Thank you. 

Nina Pucci 

') 12 21!117 
Comment�- !.32.-

Chan. Allison 

From: Reinard, Kevin (Kevin_Reinard@intuit.com] 

Sent: Thursday, January 18. 2007 1 0:41 AM 

To: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov: soliver@mp.usbr.gov: rebecca.a.victorine@usace.army.mil 

S ub ject: Folsom Point closure 

Page I ol-' I 

We want to register our serious opposition to the proposed closure of Folsom Point. As residents of Folsom. we 

use Folsom Point for boating, biking, and picnicing, so closing this lake a ccess point will have a negative effect on 

our and every other Folsom resident's quality of life. One of the main reasons we moved to Folsom (in particular 

the Briggs Ranch neighborhood) was for access to this excellent resource, one that we use quite often. 

C losing Folsom Point would also have a negative effect on our housing values, as the area would loose much of 

it's appeal to people looking to relocate to Folsom based on the access to the state park thourgh Folsom Point. 

Thank you, 

Kevin, Suzanne, Katie, and Amanda Reinard 

105 Burrill Dr. 

Folsom, CA 

, I 2 2llO 
Possible closure of Folsom Point 

Comment#$ {)) 

Chan, Allison 

From: julie carlson Oulie.carlson@comcast.net] 

Sent: Thursday, January 18.2007 9:47AM 

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov: mfinnegan@mp. usbr. gov; rebecca.a. victorine@usace .army .mil 

Subject: Possible closure of Folsom Point 

Page I of I 

It has been brought to our atlention that Folsom Point State Recreation Area may be closed for seven years during the dam 

repairs. There are many reasons we are concerned about losing this ac<.:ess to the lake. 

We moved to Briggs Ranch because it was a quiet and safe neighborhood, and because we wanted robe near "The Lake". 

East Natoma Street used to be a fairly quiet street. Ever since the dam closed, the noise level has increased immensely 

because traffic has increased. not to mention pollution. The noise and traffic will be even worse with all of the construction 

trucks coming and going from the site. 

The businesses on the corner of East Natoma and Blue Ravine rely heavily on the boaters and lake visitors to purchase gas 

and food for their dnys on the lake. Some of these businesses are already hurting because of the vacancy left with the 

departure of Ralph's. Closing this entrance will definitely have a negative impact on these businesses. 

Folsom Point is used by thousands of Folsom residents throughout the year for picnics. walking, biking. running and boating. 

The entrance on East Natoma Street is the only access to Folsom Lake in the city of Folsom. 

In addition to local and out of town boaters. Granite Bay and Roseville residents use the Beale's Point emrance which is 

already busy and fills up on regular basis. Brown's Ravine is also busy and used regularly by local and out of town boaters. 

as well as El Dorado Hills residents. If access to the lake is difficult. people will just choose to go elsewhere ... Lake Tahoe, 

Lake Berryessa. Don Pedro. Lake Camanche. The Delta. etc. 

We understand that there are other alternatives for equipment storage. so we are asking that you seriously consider the other 

options or come up with an altemative solution. Closing Folsom Point will seriously hurt our city. 

Allen and Julie Carlson 

Folsom Residents (Briggs Ranch} 

.., I 2 20D7 
Comment ,.- /,; 'f 

Chan, Allison 

From: Julie C alderwood Upedcal@comcast.net) 

Sent: Thursday, January 18. 2007 9:24 AM 

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov 

Cc: TheMayor@folsom.ca.us: admindept@folsom.ca.gov 

S ubject: Folsom Point Closure 

Dear Army Corp. Engineers. 

Page I o�· I 

I was stunned to read that the Army Corp. of Engineers is considering closing Folsom Point for up to 7 years. 

Surely the Army Corp. can come up with an alternative that does not have such a devastating impact on the 

surrounding community. As you know. Folsom Point is the only access to Folsom Lake in the City of Folsom and 

is used extensively by community m embers as well as tens of thousands of people who come from outside our 

community and benefit area businesses. 

The closure would be very upsetting to my family. We purchased a home a year and a half ago, which is 4 blocks 

from the entrance to Folsom Point, in order to take advantage of the recreational opportunities there. My children 

are in 3rd and 511 grade. The extended closure would mean that we would not have this very important part of our 

local experience until they were nearly out of high school. I walk at Folsom Point almost daily, and enjoy boating. 

swimming and picnicking there in the summer. It is an area of great beauty , fun and joy. After 7 years as a 

construction site. surely much of this would be lost. Certainly all of it would be lost to us for the duration of the 

project. This is an unacceptable loss to us as a family, and to our community. 

I have not studied the proposals being considered by the Corp. yet, but certainly there must be a better 

alternative, in terms of the fiscal and quality of life i mpact on the City of Folsom, for the staging area for the Dam 

project. Substantial areas of undeveloped land lies near the dam. Surely the Army Corp. can utilize land that will 

not impact the entire community so dreadfully. 

I want the Corp of Engineers to util ize an alternative to closing Folsom Point that meets the needs of your project 

while retaining this most important asset for the citizens of Folsom and the many thousands who come here to 

enjoy it. 

Sincerely, 

Julie Calderwood 

1 00 Denure Ct. 

Folsom. CA 

') 12 2007 
Comment#� (35' 

Chan, Allison 

From: bobolover@comcast. net 

Sent: Thursday, January 1 8. 2007 9:05AM 

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov 

Subject: Folsom Point Closure 

Page I o�· I 

The closing of Folsom Point is completely unacceptable. No. No. and No. There is no reason to close 

this recreation area to to accommodate the dam retrofit project. This would ruin property values and 

devastate people's lives. 

People move here specifically For the value of having access to Folsom Lake recreation. 

Hiding this information within a 500 page document is reprehensible. This was handled in an extremely 

sleezy manner with regards to letting the citizens of Folsom know exactly vvhat was being planned. 

A gain, NO. NO and NO to closing Folsom Point. 

It is imperative that you to come up with other options that do not make such a negative impact on the 

citizens of this area . 

Kenneth Doher1y 
Comment�- /Jf/1 

Chan, Allison 

From: Jeff & Maria S ickenger Omsickenger@comcast.net) 

Sent: Thursday. January 18, 2007 8:38 AM 

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; mfinnegan@mp. usbr.gov 

Subject: Folsom Poi nt Closure 

To whom it may concern: 

Page I of I 

I strenuously object to the proposed closure of Folsom Point State Recreation Area. This proposition is 

unacceptable to me and 

to the citizens of Folsom and our surrounding communities. Folsom Point is used by many thousands of 

community members throughout the year for outdoor recreation such as walking, biking, running, boating 

and picnicking. The closure would be an outrage and detrimentally impact the quality of life for those in 

Folsom. Since the Dam Road closed, it has been the only access to Folsom Lake within the City of Folsom 

and has been a serious draw for visitors as well. 

Please choose an alternative solution, as closing Folsom Point is absolutely unacceptable. Thank you for your 

consideration. 

Maria & Jeff Sickenger 

744 Sturbridge Dr 

Folsom, CA 95630 

..

 12 2!H(' 
Comment tt. f ;)"'f 

Chan, Allison 

From: Frances Leon [frances_leon@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Thursday. January 18, 2007 8 :16AM 

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov 

Subject: Folsom Point 

Hello, 

Page I ot' I 

I live in the Briggs Ranch area and I strongly object to the proposed closure of Folsom Point State Recreation 

Area! This proposition is unacceptable 

to the citizens of Folsom and surrounding communities. Folsom Point is used by 

thousands of community members throughout the year for walking, biking, running, 

boatingand picnicing, its closure would be an outrage. Folsom Point is the only access to Folsom Lake in the City 

of Folsom. 

Please consider alternative solutions, as closing Folsom Point is absolutely unacceptable. 

Frances Leon 

No need to miss a message. ,0l:t cmuil on-the-gn 

with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. (}eL starkd. 

1 12 2007 
Comment #Jflj j J � 

Chan, Allison 

From: Sobotta, Cindy [cindy.sobotta@intel.com] 

Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 8:05 AM 

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov; mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov 

Subject: Please do not close Folsom Point 

To whom it may concern; 

Page I of I 

I strenuously object to the proposed closure of Folsom Point State Recreatla,., Area. This 

proposition is unacceptable to me and 

to the cltlzens oF Folsom and our surroundlng communities. Folsom Point .is used by many 

thousands of com munity members throughout the year for outdoor recreation (walking, 

biking, running, boating and picnicking) and sometimes just contemplation. The 

closure would be an outrage ar�d detrimentally impact the quality of life for those in 

Folsom. Since the Dam Road closed, It has been the only access to Folsom Lake within the 

City of Folsom and has been a serious draw for visitors as well. 

Please choose an alternative solution , as closing Folsom Point is absolutely unacceptable. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Cindy Sobotta 

Strategic r ams & Planning 

CSE ness Operations 

Core Services Engineering (CSE) 

email: clndy.sgbotta@lnteJ.coro 

Phone (916) 356-9642 

; I 2 2fH)7 
Comment 111lfl f J'f 

Chan, Allison 

From: Tracy Nordheim [tracyinfolsom@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Thursday, January 1 8. 2007 5:13 AM 

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov: mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov 

Subject: RE: Proposed Closure of Folsom Point 

To whom it may concern; 

I strenuously object to the proposed closure of Folsom Point State Recreation 

Area. This proposition is unacceptable to me and 

Page I of I 

to the citizens of Folsom and our surrounding communities. Folsom Point is used by many 

thousands of community members throughout the year for outdoor recreation (walking, 

biking, running, boating and picnicking) and sometimes just contemplation. The 

closure would be an outrage and detrimentally impact the quality of life for those in 

Folsom. Since the Dam Road closed, it has been the only access to Folsom Lake within the 

City of Folsom and has been a serious draw for visitors as well. 

Please choose an alternative solution, as closing Folsom Point is absolutely unacceptable. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Tracy Nordheim 

103 Brum Court 

Folsom, CA 95630 

--- tracyinfolsom@eart hllnk.ne 1

· 

2 12 2007 
Comment fi* / 'fO 

Porter, Stacy 

From: ltomiak@comcast.net 

Sent: Friday. January 19. 2007 6:41 PM 

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov 

Subject: Closure of Folsom Point Dam Retrofit EISR 

Mr Oliver, 

Page I of 2 

I writing you to voice my opposition to planned closure of Folsom Point. This proposal will impact this 

community in such a severe way that it may never recover. destroying the lives and financial stability of 

residents still struggling to recover tt·om the closure of the dam road. Your planned proposal will not 

only effect the quality of life but the health and safety of residents and wildlife. 

According to the Bureau's Findings: 

Destruction of wetlands or possible permanent loss of wetlands 

The loss of wetlands will effect many species of birds, mammals, protected amphibians, fish, and 

endangered insects. Our need for more water is going to impact the wildlife of the lake possibly forever. 

Damage to Water Quality: 

Folsom lake is known for its beautiful clear water. Families flock to enjoy it. The increased turbidity 

and siltation will make this impossible. 

Air Quality 

This is my greatest concern. I live in Brigg's Ranch. the neighborhood directly across the street from 

Folsom Point. I have two daughters that have asthma. Your own study says that NOx and Particulate 

PMlO emissions will exceed deminiis thresholds. How is this going to effect their already challenged 

lungs? How are they going to hang out in their own backyard when you poison the air? What are the 

long term effects of breathing these chemicals. Another issue to air quality is the naturally occurring 

asbestos in the soil, it is not an issue until you statt moving it around. The soil relocation and blasting 

will put these carcinogenic chemical into the air to poison Folsom Families. 

Significant Impact to Roadways: 

Getting around Folsom has been challenging to say the least since the Dam Road closure. Natoma 

Street is already severely overcrowded, the addition of construction traffic will make it impossible to 

navigate the city and dangerous for residents. Emergency vehicles may have difficulty responding to 

emergencies due to traftic congestion. The increase of traffic will also damage our road>vays. 

Permanent Loss Of Lake Views: 

Many of us in Folsom bought our homes because of Folsom Lake and the beautiful view·s. This 

proposed closure is g oing to adversely effect the propeny values of our homes. This >viii have a huge 

impact on the financial stability ole this community. The loss of lake vie,vs is going to eliminate the very 

reason \ve moved to this community. 

Increased Noise Levels: 

According to .YOUr study Noise levels'" ill surpass levels at the three recepror sights. D:.1y and nighttime 

noise \viii be an issue. Daytime blasting ''ill cause loss ofqualir; ot'lite and possible damage to our 

l1l)111c'5. The solution of scheduling truck trafl"ic during daytime hours'' ill on I; further impact our 

1 22 ;no 
Comment #11

 /lj Q 

roads. How are residents supposed to deal \Vith the increase noise levels. You are destroying our 

quality of life. 

Change in Folsom Point State Park: 

What will be left of Folsom Point after your proposed project? With increased water levels how much 

of our park will remain? 

Loss Of Recreation: 

I personally use Folsom Point on an almost daily basis. I enjoy morning walks around the lake for 

exercise. my dog enjoys walking and s>vimming in the lake. my family picnics and celebrates special 

events in the picnic area, boating and fishing are also family favorites. The lake and easy access is why 

we bought our home where we did. If you close Folsom Point the other local boat launches will be 

overwhelmed and unable to handle the added traffic. 

Public Works: 

Folsom recently went through the headache of purring in the Natoma pipeline. This was a necessary 

inconvience for residents. Your proposal includes the possible damaging or relocation of this pipeline. 

What impact will this lead to on our community. It also mentions the creation of solid waste. This is a 

beautiful state park you are callously using as cement factory and staging area. This delicate 

environment and the many animals that call it home could be permanently destroyed and that is just too 

high a price for more water. 

One issue you did not address was our resident Eagle (aka lovingly k.now·n as Folsom) Although the 

Bald Eagle may no longer be on the endangered species list, it is still protected by the "Bald and Golden 

Eagle Protection Act" It is my understanding one of the afforded protections is not to disturb the nesting 

area or flight partern. Is your proposal in violation of this Act? 

Folsom is a wonderful famlly oriented community. the proposed closure of Folsom Point will destroy 

our quality of I ife. Please develop an alternative plan that wi II not create such adversity. 

Sincerely, 

Lisa Tomiak 

144 Singer Lane 

Folsom. CA 95630 

(9 16) 67 1-9808 
Conce rned Residents 

Comment#. l'f/ 

Chan, Allison 

From: Van Saun (mkvansaun@comcast.net] 

S ent: Wednesday, January 17. 2007 1 0:32 PM 

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov 

S ubject: Concerned Residents 

To: Shawn Oliver 

F rom: Mark and Kathy Van Saun 

PHge I of I 

We are contacting you in regards to the proposed closing of the Folsom Point Recreation Area or Dike 8. We are 

very concerned a bout this matter and ask that you would not only reconsider this proposal but give us more 

information. We have been Folsom residents and Briggs Ranch homeowners for over 11 years and we can not 

imagine what such a closure would do to our community and our neighborhood. 

Like many of our n ei ghbors, we moved here primarily because of the lake access. Our family loves to take walks. 

run and mountain bike at the lake. We are extremely concerned about the devastating effect such a closure 

woul d have on the near by businesses as well as our home values. We personally know of a family that was 

considering several homes in the area to purchase and said yesterday that they will not buy here due to this 

issue. 

Why haven't other access points been chosen to help with this matter without closing down an entire recreational 

area? Folsom Point is Fol som's only access where as Granite Bay has two access areas. 

We have dealt with the burden of the Dam Road closure and saw the e ffects of that decision on businesses, 

commutes and community access. We cannot stomach another blow to our community. 

We ask you to please reconsider this decision and find an acceptable solution. 

Sincerely, 

Mark and Kathy Van Saun 

Briggs Ranch Residents. Folsom 

� I� 2007 
Commenl #fil

 { 'f Z. 

Chan, Allison 

From: Jennifer Thompson (thompson.morley@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Thursday. January 18. 2007 11:01 AM 

To: soliver@mp.usbr.gov 

Subject: Fw: Folsom Point Closure 

Page I of I 

It has come ro my attention that the Army Corp of Engineers is considering closure of Folsom Point. It 

is my hope that this will not come to fruitition as the closure of Folsom Point will negatively impact the 

Ciry of Folsom by significantly decreasing the resources the community has to offer its residents and 

tourists. 

As you are aware. the result of the closure of the Folsom Dam and resulting redirection of traffic has 

been significant to the community in the loss of revenue and closure for businesses; and the traffic 

congestion on streets not designed for the volume of vehicles currently utilizing them on a daily basis . 

In the event of the closure of Folsom Point, the lake visitors will be diverted to lake access elsewhere, 

directing the potential revenue away from Folsom to El Dorado Hills and Granite Bay. Neighborhoods 

close to Folsom Point will no longer have quick access to Folsom Lake tor the many recreational 

purposes aside from boating and this certainly may decrease the associated property values. 

Folsom residents are proud of Folsom Lake and it would be te1Tibly ironic if the only community near 

Folsom Lake without access would be Folsom itself. Please consider options that would allow Folsom 

Point to remain available to our residents and tourists so that we may enjoy it and continue to benefit 

from the revenue it brings to our community. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Jennifer Thompson 

I 37 Bittercreek Drive 

Folsom. C A 95630 
Comment #fjJI / 'f J 

Porter, Stacy 

From: Sue Seivert (sulu21@yahoo.com) 

Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:56 PM 

To: sofiver@mp.usbr.gov; mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov 

Subject: Folsom Point 

2. 1 3 2uu7 

Page I of3 
Page 2 of 3 

Comment#. /lf} 

It is unthinkable that closing Folsom Point is to accommodate the Army Corps of Engineers' storag 

needs. Residents of Folsom have been using Folsom Point and its trai Is for years and provides the 

community a place to share in nature's beauty. This is an established area for the people. Please ll! 

alternative places that are available but not Folsom Point. Thank you. 

Assunta L. Seivert. 170 I Creekside Dr., Folsom. CA 95630 SuluJ l_ru;yahno.com 
Page 3 of 3 

Comment#41 

Check out lht: aH-11�\\ )n . �lnill�ctu- Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster . 

.., 13 2007 
Comment �- /'f i 

Porter, Stacy 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Importa nce: 

John and Cheryl Mandsager Oohnman dsager@comcast.net] 

Thursday, January 18, 2007 8:12 PM 

mfinnegan@mp. usbr.gov: soliver@mp. usbr.gov: rebecca. a. victorine@usace. army. mil 

Don't Close Folsom Pointl 

High 

�-;e '.l! . ..e � r:c t . . "' '-1 .. .. .f .;. .!1 __ .:; p:· ;_;.,..:; _ .. ,.; t- · • .:! :=-o_.; i<. _ :. : . ;; . _ J .-:2 � 1;. a! _ 

·n s ; t : � s f J c �, :J �.: l _. -: i _ ; . _ .. ,. · .. _ - y ' : 3 � " : � : -:

 _ ;a F .Jl ! 

... ') - •,.Jt�i _e t.11-e E'-.!..:om r:Jarr .:.s :::::n:.:. :.'='J :·rn: 1:: ·A-= .= - -:· :�·:::: : .·= _ :.:;.:: r :-;;:1 = - -, ·.·:-= lr. ::-=o :: .::. ;;: r.�J 

:1 ::e :ru: i ": cr.� L 

r.·. � .-.:�;n F-:J1:� :: t 

!::_ -_�

�::_:-r: �·� i. · . .-�5 h :t.� 'ta ·_;=: y::

: t 

��F��� � r� �h� pUO � : : . 

.::: ce- ··�·e �rtj �' ·.-i :: .:_ ·- � :1 : ?_: .:>o:c. :.r:� :n , J -: �:ne� � )=5. :, ·- '

·

-� - :� s· . :. o: .,,._ .. · J '1a\·= 3 

r. .:.

··e .:mpa :t r:tn -;!.� !" fa::J.

l ·; . ,'J2! i::�a :;r :.:le ..

 :J s: :.mp�J -:-:- :i:-'. mo.5 � , i � � .. c - c. _ _ , --: -- :-:� : ::�ni L .:. :.:::: 

:.;i ·.:t.:. �.J ,,.,· .. ·-- --' t -= ·:r:::: ::.3�: . :·,1� !.�= !:..:,= 3 !:'= :::. _: R-= -

- :: =-� �-'"=E'-

� ::-= 

a� p :.��.J � :.: _ :-: .a. roa: : . .a:- ·.: ..� - :i l l�-.. , 3 .. jf. :. :.2 �a 1 �pc:. ·_c ;_�E !=u::_ .:.: . 

n a r. ,: �r• 1. � . .:L3�"lo:r 

l: C �'l'ccd ar j :: 
Comment M'M �� 5 

Porter, Stacy 

From: maria [malaea99@comcast.net] 

Sent: Thursday. January 18. 2007 4:51 PM 

Page I of I 

To: themayor@folsom.ca.us; ericking@folsom.ca.us; corrprincess@ardennet.com; 

smiklos@folsom.ca.us; jstarsky@folsom.ca.us; soliver@mp.usbr.gov; mfinnegan@mp.usbr.gov 

Subject: Folsom Point Closure 

To Whom It May Concern: 

I am very frustrated and disappointed to hear about the closure of Folsom Point and strongly object to it. I am 

shocked that this has even been considered. As a Folsom resident and h omeowner in the immediately affected 

area, I am outraged that I am to be put through yet another devastating inconvenience. After the damn road 

closure and the detrimental affects on not only Folsom, but to my particular neighborhood (Briggs Ranch), this 

closure is absolutely unacceptable. 

The entire Folsom community will be losing out on our use of this beautiful facility for boating and picnicing 

(among other things). Our access to the l ake via Folsom Point/Dyke 8 is a vital part of living in this area. As a 

resident of the immedi ate area, we will h ave to endure more traffic congestion, as well as this detrimentally 

affecting our local environment and our property values. 

There has to be a better/alternate solution to this extremely long closure. 

Thank you for your consideration I 

Maria Paladino 

No virus found in this outgoing message. 

Checked by A VG Free Edition. 

Version: 7. I A I 0 I Virus Database: 268. 16.14/63 7 - Release Date: 1/1 8/2007 

') I _: �007 
Comment tJfl

 J'f(/ 

Porter, Stacy 

From: Phi lip Lee [pel9 1 1 @sbcglobal.net) 

Sent: Thursday. January 1 8, 2007 1 0:40 PM 

To: Shawn O liver 

Subject: Folsom Dam Raise 

Hi Shawn, 

I was given your name as a contact for the raising of Folsom Dam. A re you the program manager for 

this project? If not, please direct me to the lead person on this project. 

I 'vvish to comment on the p otential 7 yr. closure ol� Folsom Point SP. 

thanks. 

Phil 

, I 3 2007 
Comment iJA'I / Y 1 

Porter, Stacy 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Mike Finnegan [MFINNEGAN@mp.usbr.gov] 

Thursday. January 18. 2007 4:29 PM 

Shawn Oliver 

Fwd: Folsom Point Closure 

· , > ··�:.

�-= � J=:-ti.J.: -n:=>.. - ""!�!" .. .3::-:

'/S j - m.:�� - . �e- · 1 l : : : j' ?�··i 

j:Ji. -.ill - r: :+:-:/ · ·_,;) ·.: .. ,�, 

_ ;:;·_ ::_,:1 ::; :. :! :: � - :.;,e .:2..:>;:; :..:'1..! of !: :. .;

._.:;\ . t-1�· :oam.: / -,:-: -! r 1;.3c- t l'. ' ·" '!r-=:a �r. :: 

''l.:e:w:J�· t-.:;is • 00 1r: .:.::g , p .:.cr. i :L::� , ·.-;.:;� i:i :-. :_; �:: ;: • .:ln•j i·:oul ·' t.e de,·aE t a.t.ed b·; w'l:. .:

: r::.:s·::--s . 

'PL�r2 3�� � fl? �e;n 1 �es � n my .'h:: �h.� ... h"' -ha- a�s' use ::1_=: area .:ri � rt:qL .. o!' ba3.:.� ::tt. j 

: ���� =��: _ Js:ng =�-s �p t �:: t �xpo � i -!. �� � -m� ?s3-� 5�d c�3::�uili��- t l �n= .:. :: ��= JW� 

.:c-:am��.:.tJ· \·:�:.J:J �� a g r-:, � los.; t .. :t�:<: .�· . 

T.:;nr."'.t -:;:: H 'lm! .1 t:m 

11 �;;:t .:,_: :- ? I:H•/ 

1'" - tsr.r:. 
Comment #flf

 

Porter, Stacy 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Mike Finnegan (MFINNEGAN@mp.usbr.gov] 

Thursday, January 1 8. 2007 4:31 PM 

Shawn Oliver 

Fwd: Folsom Point State Rec 

to i 

·

;:. -; :-. e __ .: T .1 :: mj:' .= :m to ' : : :nm · :-: -:� r'3 :n •" 3 t> _; J l ; b::

 . . n ".; -: > 

'.·.·!. "'.m .L - • '.: 1

' : 1 r:

 -:..:-r,; 

' I •i : 21 '":· . . . 

I ;:; "' re: .. c...,t.:..:l �· :_��:· t ": _. t:· .. �· �.!.-.:[_:)::::?:: :1:;3·-�e of ?.;!.sarn ?oin: S:a;.:.2 :.:'t:-· : �-=> '- -� - H -�;_-� :: . 

-:1-.:. .: 1= ::cp::E i':i"' n � .: •.:r:..:::;�r·.::�" .� · m2 �n 1 

:.::;. : . .,� ::i::l=.:r.:= ::r f::.!.::�m 3:-YJ �J.: ::- s·J r r�•m :l.:.:-:q .: rr.mllr-i ·. i - :: . -· . ;;om �, . n. - -'- ·" u:c -:::l r·; �.:.:-: y 

� � -ll!:Ot:d� L r· n:mur,::!_·-f !th:::t!J-.!."-3 t-.. ;t:-.JJl :-. · J-:. ':.;1� ·.:--:,r f 1 .._ \!' r .t-.. .. - -: · i� ,,·h:. l •. i r · g , 

b!�: . .• c:;, l".lr.n_ .. :J , tr::r. i:·.g :;r:::l 

!- .:_ �n.:. -:k.:.: . .. : i j s ,.,!':.�t: :r.-:s j :�": =on:£!:0;: 13: i. �:-1 . rr:� : _05l��-= ':.ou:. . =-= �:: .l.·- .:� jc :ir:d 

-:'= - =�ler: t a .!.

'- i ::r.f.:i.:+- +- :�� �'.l . .. � - ��- .., t' ' � �.!) f - t-n s.; - - fO _""'� .. m. �1 :1--� :.z1·7! [a.," f..:ad --_ � 3;.; a , 

i":" r.a=: .L i=·�:J t.� J-.: __ "1 -:; -�=�.a: ·:.2' r_. t .=. :r. -.c::� H . nl:. t..,- � i · y . !. �- _ t s _ r- � :�.--! La� tee!'"'J a 

s�r .. cu3 �t.a·..., r .r .. :�.3i-�r3 55 ·.·li:_. 

2 :.e::5C: :!1.;) 

L:.n:�:::-ept <l.C _ 

Sr ::� --: 1 - �..:1=-]f..: "'·.:5- � 

:·�. 3.: < y- . • r. �-.. ·: --:-

i'L ::he_!.e �·m�= :"c. 

El Gc �a.d� fi __ .s, :::� 

':'J J - - ':l :F 

! - i- n , � =.:>:! i�. -:; 

':> ' !'1 r : � ' ')n . 

is