alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         This Second  Amendment To Employment  Agreement  (this  "Agreement") is
made and  entered  into on this the ___ day of August,  1999 by and  between ISG
Resources,  Inc.  ("Employer"),  a Utah  corporation with its principal place of
business  located at 136 East South  Temple,  Suite 1300,  Salt Lake City,  Utah
84111 and Clinton W. Pike, Sr. ("Employee"),  an individual who resides at 10777
Richmond Avenue, Apartment 708, Houston, Texas 77042.

         WHEREAS,  Employer and Employee entered into an Employment Agreement in
October,  1997 (the  "Employment  Agreement")  and an  Amendment  To  Employment
Agreement on October 14, 1998 (the "First Amendment");

         WHEREAS Employer and Employee desire to amend the Employment  Agreement
again as set forth herein.

         NOW,  THEREFORE,  in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants
contained  herein and other good and  valuable  consideration,  the  receipt and
sufficiency  of which are hereby  acknowledged,  the parties  agree as set forth
herein.

1. The parties agree that the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

         a.  Section 7 of the  Employment  Agreement  is  amended  by adding the
following section:

                  "g. If the Employee  dies,  his phantom  stock  right,  to the
         extent  vested and subject to the other  provisions  of the  Employment
         Agreement (as amended by the First  Amendment) and any other applicable
         laws, shall pass to his wife, Sandi S. Pike.

2. The remaining provisions of the Employment Agreement, as amended by the First
Amendment,  shall  remain in full force and effect.  Reference  is craved to the
Employment  Agreement and the First  Amendment for specific terms and conditions
thereof which are  incorporated  herein by reference,  except as amended by this
Agreement.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  intending to be legally  bound hereby the parties
hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of the day and year above written.

ISG RESOURCES, INC.                                  CLINTON W. PIKE, SR.



___________________                                 _____________________
By:________________
Its________________
§ 91.325 Primary category aircraft: Operating limitations. ( a ) No person may operate a primary category aircraft carrying persons or property for compensation or hire.
( b ) No person may operate a primary category aircraft that is maintained by the pilot-owner under an approved special inspection and maintenance program except— ( 1 ) The pilot-owner; or
( 2 ) A designee of the pilot-owner, provided that the pilot-owner does not receive compensation for the use of the aircraft.
[Doc. No. 23345, 57 FR 41370, Sept. 9, 1992]
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF PENTON MEDIA INC.

1.   Internet World Media, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

2.   Penton Media Australia Pty. Limited, an Australian corporation.

3.   Penton Media (Holdings) Limited, a United Kingdom corporation.

4.   Duke  Investments,  Inc,  a  Colorado  corporation,  and  its  wholly-owned
     subsidiary:

     A.    Duke Communications International, Inc., a Colorado corporation, and
           its wholly owned subsidiary:

           a.    Penton Communications Europe Limited a United Kingdom
                 corporation.

5.   Penton Media, S. de R.L. de C.V. (99% Penton Media, Inc. and 1% Internet
     World Media, Inc.), a Mexico corporation.

6.   Penton Media Asia Limited (65% Penton Media, Inc. and 35% Internet World
     Media, Inc.), a Hong Kong corporation.

7.   Penton Media France (SAS), a France corporation (50% Penton Media, Inc.).

8.   DVGM & Associates, a California corporation
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual report of theCommissioner of Internal Revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30...**
 
1953 | 1954
 
SuDoc Number:T 22.1:
Item Number:0955 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000934127
 
January 31, 2018
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****OSS training in the nationalparks and service abroad in World War II**
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.2:OS 7
Item Number:0648 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000931218
 
 
Contents:
 
Cover (PDF format)
 
Table of Contents (PDF format)
 
Author's Preface (PDF format)
 
Acknowledgments (PDFformat)
 
Abbreviations (PDF format)
 
Introduction (PDF format)
 
Chapter 1 "Wild Bill"Donovan and the Origins of the OSS (PDF format)
 
Chapter 2 A Wartime Organization forUnconventional Warfare (PDF format)
 
Chapter 3 Catoctin and PrinceWilliam Parks Join the War Effort (PDF format)
 
Chapter 4 Converting CatoctinMountain Park into Military Camps (PDF format)
 
Chapter 5 Transforming PrinceWilliam Forest Park into Military Camps (PDF format)
 
Chapter 6 Instructing for DangerousMissions (PDF format)
 
Chapter 7 Daily Life in Camp, Parkand Town (PDF format)
 
Chapter 8 OSS in Action:Mediterranean and European Theaters (PDF format)
 
Chapter 9 OSS in Action: The Pacificand the Far East (PDF format)
 
Chapter 10 Postwar Period: End ofthe OSS and Return to the Park Service (PDF format)
 
Chapter 11 Summary and Conclusion(PDF format)
 
References Cited (PDF format)
 
Illustrations (PDF format)
 
The Author (PDF format)
 
 
January 17, 2018
Order entered December 13 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00506
- CV FITNESS EVOLUTION, L P, ET AL . , Appellant s V. HEADHUNTER FITNESS, LLC, ET AL . , Appellee s On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

C ollin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429
- 00529
- 2010



### O RDER
We GRANT appellees James Duggan and Duggan Realty Advisors, LLC ’s , unopposed third motion for an ext ension of time to file their brief. We ORDER the brief tendered to this Court by appellees on December 3, 2013 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of we.
 By:
    
    /s/ Lawrence D. BainLawrence D. BainChief Executive OfficerBy:
    
    /s/ Michael S. BrowneMichael S. BrowneChief Financial Officer
  23
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 14.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of Amdocs Limited of our report dated March 19, 2003 (except for Note
17, which is as of July 2, 2003), related to the consolidated financial
statements of Certen Inc., as of and for the years ended December 31, 2001 and
2002, appearing in this Annual Report of Amdocs Limited on Form 20-F/A
(Amendment No. 1), for the year ended September 21, 2003:

<Table>
<Caption>
COMMISSION FILE NO.           DESCRIPTION OF FILING
<C>                     <S>
     333-91847          Form S-8
     333-92705          Form S-8
     333-31506          Form S-8
     333-34104          Form S-8
     333-58454          Form S-8
     333-39278          Form F-3 (and related Prospectus)
     333-44994          Form F-3 (and related Prospectus)
     333-57036          Form F-3 (and related Prospectus)
     333-67572          Form F-3 (and related Prospectus)
</Table>

/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP

Montreal, Quebec
September 17, 2004
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6386

ROBIN M. YOUNG, Petitioner - Appellant, versus W. F. DALIUS, Warden; BUREAU OF PRISONS; KATHLEEN HAWKS, Director, Bureau of Prisons; LSCI-BUTNER, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-235-5-BO) Submitted: September 9, 2003 Decided: October 6, 2003 Before LUTTIG, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robin M. Young, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robin M. Young seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Young has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 29.935 Shafting joints.

Each universal joint, slip joint, and other shafting joints whose lubrication is necessary for operation must have provision for lubrication.
#### § 1472.105 Does this part apply to me?

(a) Portions of this part apply to you if you are either—

(1) A recipient of an assistance award from the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service; or

(2) A(n) FMCS awarding official. (See definitions of award and recipient in §§ 1472.605 and 1472.660, respectively.)

(b) The following table shows the subparts that apply to you:

| If you are . . . | see subparts . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) A recipient who is not an individual | A, B and E. |
| (2) A recipient who is an individual | A, C and E. |
| (3) A(n) FMCS awarding official | A, D and E. |
IN THE SUPREME COURT O F THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 2 - 0 107 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. SHANE THOMPSON FREIBURG ,

Defendant and Appellant,

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 28 , 202 3 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 28 2023

08/28/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0107
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 50335 Summary Calendar

**____________ Trevor Aaron Baugh,** 

Petitioner

— Appellant **,**

versus
**Bobby Lumpkin,** Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division **,** Respondent

— Appellee

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:21

- CV

- 121

**______________________________** Before **Higginbotham, Graves,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Trevor Aaron Baugh, Texas prisoner # 02134262, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application challenging his jury

- trial conviction and sentence for robbery. He contends that the district court erred by denying

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 28, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-50335 Document: 00516731214 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/28/2023No. 22

- 50335

2 on the merits his claim that his attorney rendered ineffective assistance during h is plea hearing. As this court did not grant a certificate of appealability on Baugh’s claim that his due process rights were violated by Texas habeas laws and procedures, we lack jurisdiction to consider it. See United States v. Alaniz , 5 F.4th 632, 63 5 (5th Cir. 2021). We need not decide whether the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals denied Baugh’s state habeas claim on the merits such that 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) applies because Baugh’s claim fails even under de novo review. See Ward v. Stephens , 777 F.3d 250, 256 (5th Cir. 2015). Contrary to Baugh’s contention, he is required to show both that counsel performed deficiently and that Baugh was prejudiced by that deficient performance. See Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 6 89

- 94 (1984) ; Beets v . Scott , 65 F.3d 1258, 1265

- 72 & n.8 (5th Cir. 1995) (en banc) (holding that presumption of prejudice under Cuyler v. Sullivan , 446 U.S.
335 , 348 (1980) , applies only to cases involving counsel’s representation of multiple clients with adverse interests)

. Since the plea

- hearing transcript reasonably may be understood to indicate that Baugh maintained that he was innocent of committing robbery, his attorney did not perform deficiently by failing to advocate more forcefully for the acceptance of the plea off er at issue. See Lafler v. Cooper , 566 U.S. 156, 162

- 63 (2012). Nor does Baugh’s trial testimony establish prejudice by showing that he w ould have been willing to plead guilty to robbery under the plea offer ; at trial, he admitted only to having committed acts sufficient to support a conviction for theft, not robbery. See id. at 163; Howard v. State , 333 S.W. 3d 137, 138 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (holding that, to commit robbery, defendant must be “aware that h is conduct is reasonably certain to place someone in fear” of imminent bodily harm )

. **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 22-50335 Document: 00516731214 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/28/2023
#### § 93.53 Description of area.

The Anchorage, Alaska, Terminal Area is designated as that airspace extending upward from the surface to the upper limit of each of the segments described in § 93.55. It is bounded by a line beginning at Point MacKenzie, extending westerly along the bank of Knik Arm to a point intersecting the 350° bearing from the Anchorage International ATCT; thence north to intercept the 5.2-mile arc centered on the geographical center of Anchorage, Alaska, ATCT; thence counterclockwise along that arc to its intersection with a line bearing 180° from the intersection of the new Seward Highway and International Airport Road; thence due north to O'Malley Road; thence east along O'Malley Road to its intersection with Lake Otis Parkway; thence northerly along Lake Otis Parkway to its intersection with Abbott Road; thence east along Abbott Road to its intersection with Abbott Loop Road; thence north to its intersection with Tudor Road; thence easterly along Tudor Road to its intersection with Muldoon Road; thence northerly along Muldoon Road to the intersection of the Glenn Highway; thence north and east along the Glenn Highway to Ski Bowl Road; thence southeast along the Ski Bowl Road to a point one-half mile south of the Glenn Highway; thence north and east one-half mile south of and parallel to the Glenn Highway to its intersection with a line one-half mile east of and parallel to the Bryant Airport Runway 16/34 extended centerline; thence northeast along a line one-half mile east of and parallel to Bryant Airport Runway 16/34 extended centerline to lat. 61°17′13′′ N., long. 149°37′35′′ W.; thence west along lat. 61°17′13′′ N., to long. 149°43′08′′ W.; thence north along long. 149°43′08′′ W., to lat. 61°17′30′′ N.; thence to lat. 61°17′58′′ N., long 149°44′08′′ W.; thence to lat. 61°19′10′′ N., long. 149°46′44′′ W.; thence north along long. 149°46′44′′ W., to intercept the 4.7-mile radius arc centered on Elmendorf Air Force Base (AFB), Alaska; thence counterclockwise along the 4.7-mile radius arc to its intersection with the west bank of Knik Arm; thence southerly along the west bank of Knik Arm to the point of beginning.

[Doc. No. 29029, 64 FR 14976, Mar. 29, 1999; Amdt. 93-77, 64 FR 17439, Apr. 9, 1999]
#### SCHOOLEY v WILKER

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No. 9969.

Decided October 14, 1929

Messrs. Milton C. Moore, Alliance, and Hyre & Hyre, Cleveland, for Schooley.

Mr. Sydney A. Davies, Esq., Cleveland, for Wilker.

*670VICKERY, PJ.

We think the matter can be disposed of very quickly and very easily and that is that such a claim is not tenable. The court in finding for the defendant in the sum of $423.04 only, allowing a credit for the difference in the rental of $25.00 a month for the time that the new tenant took possession up until the end of the original lease, comitted error.

Judgment reversed and final judgment for $963.50 and interest from the time of the commencement of the suit in favor of the plaintiff in error.

Sullivan and Levine, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of aQuantive, Inc. (the “***Company***”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “***Form 10-Q***”), I, Michael Vernon, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) TheForm 10-QQ fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

 

Dated: November 13, 2003
exv10w2





Exhibit
10.2


First Amendment To

Purchase and Sale Agreement

And Joint Escrow Instructions

(TSG — LITTLE VALLEY)




     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS (this
“Agreement”), dated as of September 3, 2009, is by and between TSG LITTLE VALLEY, LP, a California
limited partnership (“Seller”), and SPT LAKE ELSINORE HOLDING CO., LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (“Buyer”), and amends that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow
Instructions dated as of September 30, 2008 as previously amended by those certain
Amended/Supplemental Escrow Instructions dated October 16, 2008 and October 27, 2008, October 27,
2008, November 11, 2008, November 25, 2008, December 30, 2008, January 13, 2009, January 27, 2009,
February 24, 2009 and that certain undated Corrective Amendment (as amended, the “Agreement”).
Capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings given them in the Agreement unless otherwise
defined herein. To the extent of any inconsistency between the terms set forth in the Agreement and
this Amendment, the terms set forth in this Amendment shall control.



     Seller and Buyer hereby reinstate the Agreement and further agree to amend the Agreement as
follows:


1. The defined term “Land” is revised to mean all the properties described on Exhibit “A”
attached hereto.



2. The defined term “Purchase Price” is revised to be Nine Million Six Hundred Thousand Dollars
($9,600,000.00).



3. The defined term “Deposit” is revised to mean Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00). The Deposit
shall be immediately released to Seller, and shall not be refundable to Buyer except upon a
termination of this Agreement as a result of Seller’s default of a material obligation under this
Agreement occurring prior to the Close of Escrow or a failure of an express condition precedent
under this Agreement to Buyer’s obligation to purchase the Property.



4. The Close of Escrow shall occur on or before November 30, 2009.




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint
Escrow Instructions as of the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	TSG LITTLE VALLEY, L.P., a California limited

partnership
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	 	Portfolio Partners, Inc., a California
 Corporation
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/ Stevan J. Gromet 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Stevan J. Gromet, President






[signatures continued on next page]




Page 1 of 2









 








[signatures
continued from prior  page]




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	SPT LAKE ELSINORE HOLDING CO., LLC, a
Delaware
limited liability company
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	By:	 	The Shopoff Corporation, a Delaware

corporation, its General Partner
	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/ William A. Shopoff 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	William A. Shopoff, President







Page 2 of 2
# EUR-Lex - 31995D0080 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995D0080

**95/80/EC: Commission Decision of 15 March 1995 granting the Portuguese Republic the derogation provided for in Article 3 (2) of Council Directive 92/102/EEC on the identification and registration of animals (Only the Portuguese text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 065 , 23/03/1995 P. 0032 - 0032 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 15 March 1995 granting the Portuguese Republic the derogation provided for in Article 3 (2) of Council Directive 92/102/EEC on the identification and registration of animals (Only the Portuguese text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (95/80/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 92/102/EEC of 27 November 1992 on the identification and registration of animals (1), as amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 3 (2) thereof,

Whereas the abovementioned Article provides for the possibility of authorizing Member States to exclude from the list of holdings required by Article 3 (1) (a) of Directive 92/102/EEC those holdings with fewer than three sheep or goats, for which they may not claim premium payments, or one pig, provided that the animals are intended for use or consumption by the owner and that they are subject to the controls required by the Directive before any movement;

Whereas the Portuguese authorities have requested this authorization and have given the appropriate assurances in respect of veterinary controls;

Whereas, therefore, the Portuguese Republic should be authorized to apply this derogation;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Portuguese Republic is hereby authorized to apply the derogation provided for in Article 3 (2) of Directive 92/102/EEC.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Portuguese Republic.

Done at Brussels, 15 March 1995.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 355, 5. 12. 1992, p. 32.