alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2008067DE.01002202.xml

| 11.3.2008 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 67/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2008

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 67/22

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 97/24/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 17. Juni 1997 über bestimmte Bauteile und Merkmale von zweirädrigen oder dreirädrigen Kraftfahrzeugen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 226 vom 18. August 1997
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 226 vom 18. August 1997

Seite 34, Kapitel 1, Anhang III Nummer 1.2.3, Satz 2:

anstatt:

„Dieser (Diese) Reifen, der (die) vom Reifenhersteller gemäß den Vorschriften des Anhangs III Abschnitte 3.1.4, 3.1.5 und 3.3 gefertigt wurde(n), muss (müssen) sich an der vorgesehenen Stelle frei bewegen können.“

muss es heißen:

„Dieser (Diese) Reifen, der (die) vom Reifenhersteller gemäß den Vorschriften des Anhangs II Abschnitte 3.1.4, 3.1.5 und 3.3 gefertigt wurde(n), muss (müssen) sich an der vorgesehenen Stelle frei bewegen können.“

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7278** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. BRYANT KELLY PRIDE, a/k/a Bryan Kelly Pride , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States Distri ct Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Abingdon
. James P. Jones , District Judge. ( 1:07

- cr - 00020

- jpj

- mfu

- 1 )

Submitted : January 13, 2011 Decided: January 20, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published pe r curiam opinion
. Bryant Kelly Pride, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Zach a ry T. Lee, Assistant United States Attorneys, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Bryant K elly Pride appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his motion for return of property . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pride , No. 1:07

- cr - 0020

- jpj

- mfu

- 1 (W.D. Va. Aug. 30, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
§ 1601.23 Preliminary or temporary relief. ( a ) In the interest of the expeditious procedure required by section 706(f)(2) of title VII, the Commission hereby delegates to the Director of the Office of Field Programs or upon delegation, the Director of Field Management Programs and each District Director the authority, upon the basis of a preliminary investigation, to make the initial determination on its behalf that prompt judicial action is necessary to carry out the purposes of the Act and recommend such action to the General Counsel. The Commission authorizes the General Counsel to institute an appropriate action on behalf of the Commission in such a case not involving a government, governmental agency, or political subdivision.
( b ) In a case involving a government, governmental agency, or political subdivision, any recommendation for preliminary or temporary relief shall be transmitted directly to the Attorney General by the Director of the Office of Field Programs or upon delegation, the Director of Field Management Programs or the District Director.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit private individuals from exercising their rights to seek temporary or preliminary relief on their own motion.
[42 FR 55388, Oct. 14, 1977, as amended at 47 FR 46275, Oct. 18, 1982; 54 FR 32061, Aug. 4, 1989; 71 FR 26828, May 9, 2006]
§ 102.149 Filing of documents; service of documents; motions for extension of time. ( a ) All motions and pleadings after the time the case is referred by the Board to the Administrative Law Judge until the issuance of the Administrative Law Judge's decision must be filed with the Administrative Law Judge together with proof of service. Copies of all documents filed must be served on all parties to the adversary adjudication.
( b ) Motions for extensions of time to file motions, documents, or pleadings permitted by § 102.150 or by § 102.152 must be filed with the Chief Administrative Law Judge, the Deputy Chief Administrative Law Judge, or an Associate Chief Administrative Law Judge, as the case may be, no later than 3 days before the due date of the document. Notice of the request must be immediately served on all other parties and proof of service furnished.
[82 FR 11783, Feb. 24, 2017]
#### LAMBIE et v CREDIT ALLIANCE CORP

Ohio Appeals, 8th, Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9137.

Decided Mar 11, 1929

Joy Seth Hurd, Cleveland, for Lambie.

Hally & Miller, Cleveland, for Corp.

Judgés WILLIAMS and RICHARDS of the Sixth Dist sitting.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

BY THE COURT

This proceeding ,in error is brought to reverse a judgment of the court of common pleas by which judgment the court below *248refused the petition of the defendant to vacate judgment, which petition was filed under Section 11631 GC.

All the evidence in the record tends to show and does show that the plaintiff took judgment upon a warrant of attorney for .more than was due the plaintiff and that the defendant was not summoned or otherwise legally notified of the time and place of taking such judgment. We also find that the court erred in excluding evidence offered by the defendant below. The action of the court in each of these respects constituted reversible error. The judgment will therefore be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Williams ;and Richards, JJ, concur. Lloyd, J, not participating.
#### § 27.871 Leveling marks.

There must be reference marks for leveling the rotorcraft on the ground.
#### BROWNING v STATE

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21082.

Decided Feb 20, 1929

Syllabus by

ROBINSON, J.

TRIAL

(590 J3f) The word “men”, used in Section 13568, General Code, was there used in a generic sense rather than a specific sense, and not to distinguish between men and women.

Women may be summoned as grand jurors under that section.

(590 J3c) A person who has been convicted of an offense in another state of the United States, the penalty for which offense is imprisonment in a penitentiary of such state, and who has served his sentence and has not received a general pardon fi’om the Governor of such state, is not thereby disqualified as a juror in this state, where the crime of which he was charged and convicted in such other state would not, if it had been committed in this state, have required an imposition of a sentence to one of the penitentiaries of this state.

CRIMINAL LAW

(190 I) The several counts of an indictment containing, more than one count are not interdependent. A verdict respond*142ing to a designated count will be construed in the light of the count designated, and no other. An inconsistency in a verdict does not arise out of inconsistent responses to different counts, but only arises out of inconsistent responses to the same count. (Griffin v State, 18 Ohio St, 438 approved and followed.)

Kinkade, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ, concur. Marshall, CJ, not participating.
#### TYLER v VISTULA REALTY CO

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist, Lucas Co

No. 2110,

Decided Jan 14, 1929

Sol D Tucker, Toledo, for Tyler.

Marshall, Melhorn, Marlar & Martin, Toledo, for Realty Co.

RICHARDS, J

It is contended that the ordinance does not apply to the situation pleaded and disclosed in the opening statement, because the public porch, passageway or corridor was not in the building. We cannot find *107that such contention is justified. The ordinance was enacted for the safety of the general public and of tenants occupying the building, and must be construed to include such a public passageway and porch or corridor in a hotel or apartment house, as is described. So far, therefore, as the negligence of the defendant is concerned, the direction of the verdict was unwarranted.

It is contended, however, that the petition and the opening statement of counsel raise a presumption of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff directly resulting in her own injury. On a motion for a directed verdict, on the opening, statement of counsel for plaintiff, the statement must be construed most favorably to the plaintiff. The petition charges that without her fault she “stepped upon some article” which caused her to be thrown, while the opening statement of counsel is to the effect that she was unable to determine whether it was a raise in the floor or what it was. This would justify the introduction of evidence to show that she stepped on some substance that had been dropped on the floor by some other tenant or person, shortly before her injury, and that she had no knowledge of it. The statement, in the opinion of this court, does not show facts which raise a presumption of her negligence and bar her recovery. In this respect the case .differs from McKinley vs. Niederst, decided by the Supreme Court March 21, 1928, 118 Ohio St.,...., for, in ■that case, the plaintiff fell down a stairway of the existence of which she had full knowledge, and there was no ordinance requiring the same to be lighted. If the stairway in that case had been constructed during the day while she was absent and on her return after dark, without knowledge of its existence and while it was unlighted, she had fallen down it, the lighting thereof being required by ordinance there would be some similarity in the cases.

It is well known that the right to direct a verdict on the opening statement of counsel should be exercised with great caution and only when it clearly appears therefrom that the plaintiff iS not entitled to recover. Cornell vs. Morrison, 87 Ohio St., 215.

For the reasons given the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded for new trial.

Williams and Lloyd, JJ, concur.
#### § 1202.10 Appointment of referees.

Section 3, Third, (e) title I of the act makes it the duty of the National Mediation Board to appoint and fix the compensation for service a neutral person known as a “referee” in any case where a division of the National Railroad Adjustment Board becomes deadlocked on an award, such referee to sit with the division and make an award. The National Mediation Board in appointing referees is bound by the same requirements that apply in the appointment of neutral arbitrators as outlined in § 1202.9
# AGENCY:

 Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department of Agriculture. 

# ACTION:

 Notice of availability of proposed changes in the Iowa NRCS State Technical Guide for review and comment

# SUMMARY:

                         It has been determined by the NRCS State Conservationist for Iowa that changes must be made in the NRCS State Technical Guide specifically in Section 4, Practice Standards and Specifications                         #                        327, Conservation Cover;                         #                        329a, No Till;                         #                        329b, Mulch Till;                         #                        329c, Ridge Till; and                         #                        386, Field Border, to account for improved technology. These practices can be used in systems that treat highly erodible land.                     

# DATE:

 Comments will be received for a 30-day period on January 19, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Leroy Brown, State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Federal Building, 210 Walnut Street, Suite 693, Des Moines, Iowa 50309; at 515/284-4260; fax 515/284-4394. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after enactment of the law of NRCS State technical guides used to carry out highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days the NRCS will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. Following that period a determination will be made by the NRCS regarding disposition of those comments and a final determination of change will be made. 

 January 4, 2000. 

Leroy Brown, 

State Conservationist. 

[FR Doc. 00-1196 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-16-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           775,314
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           891,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                       0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           211,827
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             211,827
<LOANS>                                        5,422,973
<ALLOWANCE>                                       32,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,382,732
<DEPOSITS>                                     4,995,294
<SHORT-TERM>                                           0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              111,485
<LONG-TERM>                                      600,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             911
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,666,667
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 7,382,732
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  507,134
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  5,386
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  61,410
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 573,930
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               276,434
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               315,214
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            258,806
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                     0
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                          0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  218,003
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   47,996
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        47,996
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      37,371
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      7.99
<LOANS-NON>                                            0
<LOANS-PAST>                                      57,415
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                       0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  32,700
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                          0
<RECOVERIES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 32,700
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              32,700
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                0



</TABLE>
# L_2017040DE.01007801.xml

| 17.2.2017 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 40/78 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2017

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 40/78

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 95/46/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 24. Oktober 1995 zum Schutz natürlicher Personen bei der Verarbeitung personenbezogener Daten und zum freien Datenverkehr

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 281 vom 23. November 1995
  )

Seite 40 Artikel 7 Buchstabe f

Anstatt:

„... die gemäß Artikel 1 Absatz 1 geschützt sind, überwiesen.“

muss es heißen:

„... die gemäß Artikel 1 Absatz 1 geschützt sind, überwiegen.“.

---
Marias River 

Marias River 

Glacier A Allb be errttaa National Park SSaassk ka attc chheewwa an n Grassland Bird/Greater Sage-Grouse

Priority Areas ACEC & Frenchman Blackfeet Indian

Reservati

232 

89 

")

£¤

on 

Browning Cut Bank 15 

Shelby 

§ ̈¦Remaining Lands Remaining Lands 

Chester 

Alternative B 

2 

87 

North Missouri Breaks 

Little South Phillips Rockies 

Fort Benton 

CMR National

Wildlife Refuge 

£¤

£¤ Havre 

191 

Chinook Western Intact Remaini

Prai Grasslands Lands 

£¤

rie ng

Ind

Ft. Belknap 

Rocky Boys Indian Reservation Malta

ian Reservati ")66 on 

Glasgow 

0 50 100

Miles

Created by the Malta Field Office in December 2012 Albers Equal Area, NAD83, Meters

1:2,500,000 

Glacier A Allb be errtta a National Park SSaassk ka attc chheewwa an n

Blackfeet Indian

Reservati

232 

89 2 

")

£¤ £¤

on 

Browning Cut Bank 15 

Shelby 

§ ̈¦

Remaining Lands Remaining Lands 

Frenchman/

Rock Creek

Chester 

87 

nd

£¤

I

£¤191
 

Ft. Belknap 

Rocky Boys Indian Reservation Malta

ian Reservati ")66

Remaining Lands 

Havre Chinook 

on 

Glasgow 

Alternatives C & D 

Little South Phillips

Rockies 

Fort Benton 

CMR National

Wildlife Refuge 

North Missouri Breaks 

South Valley 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
 

HiLine District

Map W.4 

Travel Management Areas

Alternatives B-D
 

¬
 Mapa depict the Travel Management boundaries for

Alternatives B, C, and D. The boundaries are not

intended to confer authority, responsibility, or

jurisdiction over lands and waters that are not 

administered by the BLM. Proposed boundaries and 

regulations apply only to BLM-administered lands 

within those boundaries. 

Travel Planning Priority

High

Moderate 

Low 

TMA Boundary

RMP Boundary 

State of Montana 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by

the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or 

completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use with other

data, or for purposes not intended by the BLM. This map may not 

meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed

through digital means and information may be updated without 

notification. 

! H i L i n e R M P Kalispell 

!Great Falls 

Lew

!

istown ^ Helena

! ! Miles City

Butte !

Billings
#### § 1620.19 Equality of wages—application of the principle.

Equal wages must be paid in the same medium of exchange. In addition, an employer would be prohibited from paying higher hourly rates to all employees of one sex and then attempting to equalize the differential by periodically paying employees of the opposite sex a bonus. Comparison can be made for equal pay purposes between employees employed in equal jobs in the same establishment although they work in different departments.
# AGENCY:

 Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

 Final rule; correction of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

                         This document corrects the effective date of the correction published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on January 3, 2000. The effective date is being changed from January 3, 2000, to December 30, 1999, to permit the corrected subpart F, Procedures to Request a Referendum, to be published in the 2000 issue of the Code of Federal Regulations.                    

# DATES:

 The effective date of the January 3, 2000 rule is corrected to December 30, 1999.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Ralph L. Tapp, Chief, Marketing Programs Branch, Livestock and Seed program, (202) 720-1115.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                     The Department of Agriculture (Department) published a correction in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 3, 2000 (65 FR 1), redesignating section numbers to a final rule published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 20, 1999 (64 FR 45413), which established the procedures for a Request for Referendum pursuant to the Soybean Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Act (7 U.S.C. 6301-6311) and the Soybean Promotion and Research Order (7 CFR part 1220).                

The substance of the January 3, 2000, correction requires no change. However, the effective date of the correction is being changed to December 30, 1999, to enable those changes to appear in the 2000 issue of the Code of Federal Regulations.

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         issue of January 3, 2000 (65 FR 1), make the following correction. On page 1, in the first column, under the caption                         **EFFECTIVE DATE**                         correct the date to read: “December 30, 1999.”                    

January 12, 2000

Barry L. Carpenter,

Deputy Administrator, Livestock and Seed Program.

[FR Doc. 00-1224 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-02-M
§ 102.159 Exclusions. ( a ) ( 1 ) The Agency is not authorized by the Debt Collection Act of 1982 (31 U.S.C. 3716) to use administrative offset with respect to: ( i ) Debts owed by any State or local government;
( ii ) Debts arising under or payments made under the Social Security Act, the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, or the tariff laws of the United States; or
( iii ) When a statute explicitly provides for or prohibits using administrative offset to collect the claim or type of claim involved.
( 2 ) No claim that has been outstanding for more than 10 years after the Board's right to collect the debt first accrued may be collected by means of administrative offset, unless facts material to the right to collect the debt were not known, and could not reasonably have been known, by the official of the Agency who was charged with the responsibility to discover and collect such debts until within 10 years of the initiation of the collection action. A determination of when the debt first accrued may be made according to existing laws regarding the accrual of debts, such as under 28 U.S.C. 2415. Unless otherwise provided by contract or law, debts or payments owed the Board which are not subject to administrative offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716 may be collected by administrative offset under the common law or other applicable statutory authority, pursuant to this paragraph (a) or Board regulations established pursuant to such other statutory authority.
( b ) Collection by offset against a judgment obtained by a debtor against the United State will be accomplished in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3728.
[82 FR 11784, Feb. 24, 2017]
§ 437.53 Pre-flight and post-flight operations. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76727 , Sept. 19, 2024.
A permittee must protect the public from adverse effects of hazardous operations and systems in preparing a reusable suborbital rocket for flight at a launch site in the United States and returning the reusable suborbital rocket and any support equipment to a safe condition after flight. At a minimum, a permittee must— ( a ) Establish a safety clear zone that will contain the adverse effects of each operation involving a hazard; and
( b ) Verify that the public is outside of the safety clear zone before and during any hazardous operation.