alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2009067EN.01009501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 12.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 67/95 |

---

Corrigendum to Council Directive 96/96/EC of 20 December 1996 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers

(
[Official Journal of the European Communities L 46 of 17 February 1997](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_1997_046_R_TOC)
)

On page 11, Annex II, Table, point 2

for:

| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | ‘2. | Steering and steering wheel | | | | | | --- | --- | | 2. | Steering | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 2.1. | Mechanical condition | | | | | --- | --- | | 2.2. | Steering wheel | | | | | --- | --- | | 2.3. | Steering play | | | | | --- | --- | | 2.4. | Wheel bearings | | | | | | --- | --- | | 2.1. | Mechanical condition | | | | | --- | --- | | 2.2. | Steering play | | | | | --- | --- | | 2.3. | Steering system attachment’, | |

read:

| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | ‘2. | Steering and steering wheel | | | | | | --- | --- | | 2. | Steering | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 2.1. | Mechanical condition | | | | | --- | --- | | 2.2. | Steering wheel | | | | | --- | --- | | 2.3. | Steering play | | | | | | --- | --- | | 2.1. | Mechanical condition | | | | | --- | --- | | 2.2. | Steering play | | | | | --- | --- | | 2.3. | Steering system attachment | | | | | --- | --- | | 2.4. | Wheel bearings’; | |

on page 13, Annex II, Table, point 7.5

for:

| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | ‘7.5. | First-aid kit | | | | | | --- | --- | | 7.5. | Safety belts | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 7.5.1. | Security of mountings | | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 7.5.3. | Operation | | | | | | --- | --- | | 7.5.2. | Condition of belts’, | |

read:

| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | ‘7.5. | First-aid kit | | | | | | --- | --- | | 7.5. | Safety belts | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 7.5.1. | Security of mountings | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 7.5.2. | Condition of belts | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | 7.5.3. | Operation’. | |

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Soldiers of misfortune?**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:D 101.146:SO 4/2
Item Number:0307-A-31 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000930356
 
January 12, 2018
.•.Mii!»ii:miti'~S'-'''' ' SuperfVin dRecord s Cente r SITE : HOC\X>OO A ^C^ s 

# ^ih t TPdDWF s a mi^mmwmdD Wo^ncK : 4-isg>^ ^

CommonzveaCtf

i o f iMassachusett s
Jul y 22 , 200 9 Mr . Danie l Keef

e USEP A 1 Congres s Stree t Boston , MA 0211 4 Dea r Mr . Keefe : PUBLI C WORK S DEPARTMEN T MAR K P . RYAN , PE , PL S Directo r o f Publi c Work s cf

e Town Enginee r GAR Y RSCHORE R Asst . Supt . o f

Publi c Works

Th e followin g i s asummary o f th e revie w proces s utilize db y th e Tow n o f Norwoo d whe n evaluatin g and/o r

approvin g variou s publi c work s projects . Thi s proces s woul db e followe dfo

r an y work , publi c o r

private , on an y portio n o f th e Norwoo dPCB s Superfun d site , inclusiv e of

th e Town-owne dMeado w Broo k parcel . Whe n publi c o r

privat e project s ar e planned , researc h i s performe da t th e Tow n of Norwoo dEngineerin g Department . I n addition , th e Water , Sewe r an dDrai n Maste r Plan s ar e typicall y viewe dt o determin e wha t utilitie s ar e withi n th e area . Thi s Maste r Plan (Attachmen t

1 ) ha s bee n annotate dt o referenc e aPlan o f Restricte dAre a (Attachmen t

2 ) whic h detail s th e property us e restriction s an dspecia l requirement s pertainin g t o th e Meado w Broo k Parcel . Thes e restriction s ar e further describe di n a Consen t Decre e betwee n U.S . EP A an dth e Tow n o f Norwoo dan dwhic h wa s recorde di n th e Norfolk

County Registry o f

Deed s (Boo k

2640 7 Pag e 129 ) Fo r th e abuttin g street s o f

Kerr y Place , Sixt

h Stree t an dWes t Borde r Road , acop y o f

th e Plan o f Restricte dArea s i s locate di n th e correspondin g car dreferenc e file (for thes e streets , i t i s Fil e C8-3A) . Thi s car dreferenc e fil e i s reviewe dfo r utility an dplan informatio n surroundin g th e Meado w Broo k parcel . If an y question s arise , pleas e d o no t hesitat e t o contac t

m e a t 781-762-124 0 xl61 .
Mar k P . Ryan^FE , FL S Directo r o f PublicQiVork

s / Tow n Enginee r

SDM S DocI D 47582 8
(781)762-141 3 On e Lyma n Plac e Norwood , M A 02062-099 5 Fa x #(781)762-937 8

# I|3 - 

# z 0

< 

# I ( 0 

# "^ni O c4 1 VA ^

. ^ C J . s / /^^W^T "
#### The People of the State of New York, Resp’t, v. John Lewis, App’lt.

*(Court of Appeals,*

*Filed June 28, 1889.)*

Cbiminal law—Homicide—What facts will wabbant conviction.

On the trial of the defendant, for murder, the evidence tended to show *598that defendant had shot and wounded the deceased on a previous occasion; that she had left him; that he sought to regain her society, and that she repulsed him; that he had threatened her, and on the morning of the homicide had armed himself with two pistols and waited for her as she went to the butcher shop, and on her return to the house where she was employed, followed her in, and shot her several times, twice fatally. *Held,*that the facts fully warranted a conviction.

Appeal from a judgment of the court of general sessions, in and for the county of New York, entered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of murder in the first degree.

*Wm. F. Howe,*for app’lt; *John W. Goff,*assistant district attorney, for resp’t.

Per Ctjriam.

We have deemed it our duty to examine the record in this case, notwithstanding the appeal had been substantially abandoned. The evidence justifies the claim of the district attorney that the killing of Alice Jackson was a deliberately planned and premeditated murder. There was motive, preparation, lying in wait for opportunity, and a fatal execution of the murderous purpose, under circumstances of great atrocity. The evidence against the defendant was given by disinterested witnesses. It shows that the relations between the deceased and the defendant had been meretricious; that the defendant had shot and wounded the deceased on a previous occasion; that she had left him; that he sought to regain her society, and that she repulsed him; that he had threatened her, and on the morning of the homicide, had armed himself with two pistols, and waited for her as she went to the butcher shop, and on her return to the house where she was employed, followed her in, and shot her several times, twice fatally. His subsequent conduct and declarations corroborate the evidence of the eye-witnesses of the transaction.

The defendant sought, by his own testimony, to show that the deceased shot herself, but his story is so contradictory and incredible as to render it impossible of belief. The facts of the case fully warranted a conviction, and the jury reached the only reasonable conclusion.

There was but one exception to evidence, and that was on the ground that certain evidence offered was cumulative,. and was clearly frivolous.

There were two exceptions to the charge, and both related to statements of fact. .The judge corrected one, and submitted it to the jury to find as to the other fact referred to. The trial was a fair one, and there is no reason for disturbing the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

All concur, except Finch, J., absent.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ERIC A. WELCH, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3495 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed September 12, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Kimberly K. Fernandez, Judge. Eric A. Welch, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Reeves v. State, 957 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 2007); Pruitt v. State, 801 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

CRENSHAW, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
I--AA- 2009 - 122 Cj

9. Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Transport Canada Richard Topham 5/5/09 No Objections

613-952-4428

Bombardier Chester Liburski 5/5/09 No Objections

Aerospace 5]4-855-5001

ext 89036

Regional Airline Dave Lotterer 5/7/09 Sent Message on 5/7 J09 No response

Association 202-367-1252 Yet.

lotterer@raa.org
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 28, 2015

s0720

Order 

Clerk

July 28, 2015

150402

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150402

COA: 322907

Wayne CC: 10-001478-FC

MICHAEL SHAWN HOLCOMB, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 15, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
#### CITY OF FULTON, Respondent, v. ROBERT CRAIGHEAD, Appellant.

Kansas City Court of Appeals,

May 27, 1912.

1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS: Plumbers: License: Right to Tax: Ordinance. A city charter did not name plumbing as a business or vocation which might be taxed, and it was held that an ordinance requiring plumbers to pay a license of $25 for the revenue fund, was invalid.

2. -: -: -: -:.-: Business: Shop. An ordinance which requires a license tax for plumbers in doing any work connected with sewers and house connections therewith, is essentially a tax on his business if conducted outside of his shop.

Appeal from Callaway Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *D. H. Harris,*Judge.

Reversed.

*E. L. McCall*for appellant.

*N. T. Crane*for respondent.

ELLISON, J.

Defendant was convicted of violating a certain ordinance of the city of Fulton, a city of the third class, in doing certain work without being licensed as a plumber. That ordinance provided that “No person, firm or corporation shall lay, alter or repair any house drain, sewer, or plumbing work, or *91make any connections whatever with any sewer, . . . or do any kind of work connected with laying house drains, or sewers, or plumbing . . . etc., unless regularly licensed by the city council.” Section 4 of the ordinance requires any one “desiring to do business as a plumber, in connection with the sanitary sewer system,” shall file application for license, etc., and that he shall give a certain bond, etc. It then provides for a “license fee of twenty-five dollars to go to the general revenue fund.” Section 5 provides, in addition, for a permit to connect with any sewer; and section 8 provides for a permit fee of two dollars and fifty cents.

The ordinance requires a license of twenty-five dollars, to go into the general revenue fund of the city, for the privilege of carrying on the general business of plumbing. The statute (Sec. 9580, R, S. 1909) provides that no municipal corporation shall have the power to impose a license tax on any business, calling, vocation or pursuit, unless “it is specially named as taxable in the charter,” or unless “such power be conferred by statute.”

The statute (section 9253) enumerating the kinds of business, or the callings, vocations or pursuits, which may be taxed, does not name plumbing as one of them. Nor is there anything in any other statute from which the power is either fairly or . necessarily implied. [City of Independence v. Cleveland, 167 Mo. 384.] Therefore the city of Fulton must look to the Legislature, instead of the courts, for the requisite power.

It is said that this ordinance only contemplates a fee to be paid by a plumber for the privilege of connecting with sewers. It does not read so narrowly as that. It provides for the business of house plumbing and drains. In fact, it embraces about all of a plumber’s business, except that which he might carry on inside his shop as a merchant or manufacturer. Besides, as shown above, a connecting fee of two dol*92lars and fifty cents is provided for iii another part of the ordinance.

As the defendant should not have been convicted, the judgment will be reversed.

All concur.
#### Tedra Taylor, Respondent, v New York City Transit Authority, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 52]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), dated May 1, 1998, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

On March 2, 1994, the plaintiff was injured when she allegedly slipped and fell, on an ice- and snow-covered stairway while descending into the subway station at 75th Street in Jackson Heights, Queens, during a snow and ice storm. The plaintiff claims that she slipped on old ice from a previous snowstorm.

A party in control of real property may be held liable for a hazardous condition created on its premises because of the accumulation of snow or ice only if it had a reasonably sufficient time from the cessation of the precipitation to remedy the condition *(see, Simmons v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.,*84 NY2d 972; *Mangieri v Prime Hospitality Corp.,*251 AD2d 632; *Wall v Village of Mineola,*237 AD2d 511). A defendant cannot be held liable for an injury caused by a storm which was in progress at the time of the injury.

Based upon the record, there is simply no proof that ice from a prior storm remained in the particular area where the plaintiff fell at the time of the accident or that old ice caused her fall *(cf., Granato v Bella Vista Group Assocs.,*239 AD2d 781). As it would be pure speculation that preexisting ice caused the plaintiffs fall, it was error to deny the defendant’s *385motion. Krausman, J. P., McGinity, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.
§ 17.11 What are the Secretary's obligations in interstate situations? ( a ) The Secretary is responsible for: ( 1 ) Identifying proposed Federal financial assistance that have an impact on interstate areas;
( 2 ) Notifying appropriate officials and entities in states which have adopted a process and which select the Department's program or activity.
( 3 ) Making efforts to identify and notify the affected state, areawide, regional, and local officials and entities in those states that have not adopted a process under the Order or do not select the Department's program or activity;
( 4 ) Responding pursuant to § 17.10 of this part if the Secretary receives a recommendation from a designated areawide agency transmitted by a single point of contact, in cases in which the review, coordination, and communication with the Department have been delegated.
( b ) The Secretary uses the procedures in § 17.10 if a state process provides a state process recommendation to the Department through a single point of contact.
#### Ella Barnes, Petitioner, v. W. H. Price as Judge and R. A. Willis, Respondents.—Original Proceedings for Mandamus.

D. L. McKinnon, for Petitioner.

Petition denied November 21st, 1911.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****National Elk Refuge : ....bison hunting information and regulations**
 
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017
 
SuDoc Number:I 49.6:EL 5/2/
Item Number:0612-E-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000934154
 
March 13, 2018
Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Sherry Couturier, CFO of American Internation Industries, Inc., a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following
certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with
respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007.

The undersigned certifies that the above
quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above report fairly presents, in
all respects, the financial condition of American International Industries Inc. and
results of its operations.

Date: August 13, 2007
Sherry Couturier
CFO/s/ Sherry Couturier
FILED 

AUG 25 2009 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District and 

Bankruptcy Courts 

Douglas McLaren, ) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Plaintiff, 

v. Civil Action No. 09 1611 

Colin Powell, 

Defendant. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This matter is before this court on the plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis, 

pro se complaint, motion to seal, and motion for appointed legal counsel. The court will grant 

the application, dismiss the complaint because it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be 

granted against this defendant, and deny the remaining motions as moot. 

The complaint seeks "immediate relief of phys[ic ]al, civil momentary harm," Complaint 

at 2, and damages of 4.7 trillion dollars, id at 4. The remainder of the four pages ofthe 

complaint consists of incoherent phrases and terms, such as the following: 

Id at 2. 

Religious persecution, political persecution, difirmation [sic], slander, criminal 

slander, discrim[in]ation, racism, reverse racism discrim[in]ation. Sexual 

harassment harassment, invasion of privacy invasion criminal invasion of privacy 

violation of domain, to violations of sovereign domain. Invasion of domain of 

legal filings, retal[ia]tory acts. Interference with legal filings .... 

This court is obligated by federal law to dismiss a complaint that is filed without 

prepayment of filing fees whenever it determines that the complaint fails to state a claim upon 

which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Here, the complaint does not 
contain any factual allegations to establish that the plaintiff has suffered an injury attributable to 

the defendant. In fact, the defendant is not mentioned by name or reference outside the caption 

of the complaint. Accordingly, the complaint does not state a claim upon which relief may be 

granted against the defendant, and the court will dismiss the complaint. 

An appropriate order accompanies this memorandum 0 . . on. 

Unit 

- 2 -
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12294]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 050400A]


Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Council) Ad-Hoc 
Marine Committee (MRC) to hold a work session that is open to the 
public.

DATES: The work session will be held Tuesday, May 30, 2000 and 
Wednesday, May 31, 2000. The meeting on Tuesday will start at 1 p.m. 
and end when business for the day has been finished. The Wednesday 
meeting will begin at 8 a.m. and will continue until 3 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The work session will be held at the Pacific Fishery 
Management Council office, 2130 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 224, Portland, 
OR 97201.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Seger, Pacific Fishery Management 
Council, (503) 326-6352.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The primary purpose of this work session is 
to review a draft analysis developed to assist in determining whether 
or not marine reserves should be used by the Council as a management 
tool.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in the Ad-Hoc Marine 
Reserve Committee meeting agenda may come before the Ad-Hoc Marine 
Reserve Committee for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal Ad-Hoc Marine Reserve Committee action during this meetings. 
Ad-Hoc Marine Reserve Committee action will be restricted to those 
issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising after 
publication of this notice that require emergency action under section 
305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 
provided the public has been notified of the CPSMT's intent to take 
final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to Mr. John Rhoton at (503) 326-6352 
at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: May 5, 2000.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 00-12294 Filed 5-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
#### § 398.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to establish general guidelines for the determination of basic essential air service for each eligible place under 49 U.S.C. 41731 and 41732. Procedures for the determination of the essential air service level for a place are contained in part 325 of this chapter.