alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 102.4 Methods of service of process and papers by the Agency; proof of service. ( a ) *Method of service for certain Agency-issued documents.* Complaints and compliance specifications (including accompanying notices of hearing, and amendments to either complaints or to compliance specifications), final orders of the Board in unfair labor practice cases and Administrative Law Judges' decisions must be served upon all parties personally, by registered or certified mail, by leaving a copy at the principal office or place of business of the person required to be served, by email as appropriate, or by any other method of service authorized by law.
( b ) *Service of subpoenas.* Subpoenas must be served upon the recipient personally, by registered or certified mail, by leaving a copy at the principal office or place of business of the person required to be served, by private delivery service, or by any other method of service authorized by law.
( c ) *Service of other Agency-issued documents.* Other documents may be served by the Agency by any of the foregoing methods as well as by regular mail, private delivery service, facsimile, or email.
( d ) *Proof of service.* In the case of personal service, or delivery to a principal office or place of business, the verified return by the serving individual, setting forth the manner of such service, is proof of service. In the case of service by registered or certified mail, the return post office receipt is proof of service. However, these methods of proof of service are not exclusive; any sufficient proof may be relied upon to establish service.
( e ) *Service upon representatives of parties.* Whenever these Rules require or permit the service of pleadings or other papers upon a party, a copy must be served on any attorney or other representative of the party who has entered a written appearance in the proceeding on behalf of the party. If a party is represented by more than one attorney or representative, service upon any one of such persons in addition to the party satisfies this requirement. Service by the Board or its agents of any documents upon any such attorney or other representative may be accomplished by any means of service permitted by these Rules, including regular mail.
§ 61.163 Aeronautical experience: Powered-lift category rating. ( a ) A person who is applying for an airline transport pilot certificate with a powered-lift category rating must have at least 1,500 hours of total time as a pilot that includes at least: ( 1 ) 500 hours of cross-country flight time;
( 2 ) 100 hours of night flight time;
( 3 ) 250 hours in a powered-lift as a pilot in command, or as a second in command performing the duties of a pilot in command under the supervision of a pilot in command, or any combination thereof, which includes at least— ( i ) 100 hours of cross-country flight time; and
( ii ) 25 hours of night flight time.
( 4 ) 75 hours of instrument flight time in actual or simulated instrument conditions, subject to the following: ( i ) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(4)(ii) of this section, an applicant may not receive credit for more than a total of 25 hours of simulated instrument time in a flight simulator or flight training device.
( ii ) A maximum of 50 hours of training in a flight simulator or flight training device may be credited toward the instrument flight time requirements of paragraph (a)(4) of this section if the training was accomplished in a course conducted by a training center certificated under part 142 of this chapter.
( iii ) Training in a flight simulator or flight training device must be accomplished in a flight simulator or flight training device that represents a powered-lift.
( b ) Not more than 100 hours of the total aeronautical experience requirements of paragraph (a) of this section may be obtained in a flight simulator or flight training device that represents a powered-lift, provided the aeronautical experience was obtained in an approved course conducted by a training center certificated under part 142 of this chapter.
[Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16298, Apr. 4, 1997; Amdt. 61-103, 62 FR 40906, July 30, 1997; Amdt. 61-104, 63 FR 20289, Apr. 23, 1998]
#### Lucius H. Beers et al., Appellants, *v.*Abby S. Marshall et al., Respondents, and United States Trust Company of New York, Appellant.

Argued January 14, 1937;

decided March 9, 1937.

*534
      *Lucius H. Beers, Sherman Baldwin*and *Kenneth E. Ryan*for plaintiffs, appellants, and for United States Trust Company of New York, defendant, appellant.

*L. S. Breckinridge, W. H. L. Edwards*and *J. W. Edwards*for Abby S. Marshall, respondent.

*Charles L. Griffin, H. G. E. Borchert*and *Frederick L. Allen*for Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: Finch, J.
CONSULTING AGREEMENT

This agreement is between MARSHAL HOLDINGS INTERNATIONAL, Inc, (the "Company") a
Nevada corporation with headquarters in Las Vegas, Nevada and Kathy Janssen (the
"Consultant"), at 2771 East French Camp Road, Manteca, CA 95336.

     WHEREAS, The Company is a distribution center and seller of nutritional
     products based upon proprietary formulations; and

     WHEREAS, Consultant is an expert in the field of finance and business
     strategies; and

     WHEREAS, The Company has used the Consultant's services to advise the
     Company regarding business strategies and financial planning. Now
     therefore, the parties hereto agree to the following:

1.   COMPENSATION: Both parties agree that past services performed on behalf of
     -------------
     the Company will be compensated in the amount of $50,000 and payment will
     be for services rendered to date. Payment will be in the form of S8 stock
     and it will be issued and delivered to the Consultant within two business
     days of the signing of this agreement.

2.   CONFIDENTIALITY: The Consultant covenants that all information concerning
     ----------------
     the Company, including proprietary information, which it obtains as a
     result of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be kept
     confidential and shall not be used by the Consultant except for the direct
     benefit of the Company nor shall the confidential information be disclosed
     by the Consultant to any third party without the prior written approval of
     the Company.

3.   INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: The Consultant and the Company hereby acknowledge
     -----------------------
     that the Consultant is an independent contractor.

4.   MISCELLANEOUS:
     -------------

     GOVERNING LAW: This Agreement shall be construed under the internal laws of
     --------------
     the State of Nevada, and the Parties agree that the exclusive jurisdiction
     for any litigation or arbitration arising from this Agreement shall be in
     Las Vegas, Nevada.

IN WITNES WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed or caused this Agreement to
be executed as of February 8, 2007.


------------------------------------
Consultant
By:  Kathy Jannsen


------------------------------------
By:  Rick Bailey
Its: President/CEO
#### § 1203.1 Mediation services.

Applications for the mediation services of the National Mediation Board under section 5, First, of the Railway Labor Act, may be made on printed forms N.M.B. 2, copies of which may be secured from the Board's Chief of Staff's Office or on the Internet at *www.nmb.gov.* Such applications and all correspondence connected therewith should be submitted in duplicate. The application should show the exact nature of the dispute, the number of employees involved, name of the carrier and name of the labor organization, date of agreement between the parties, if any, date and copy of notice served by the invoking party to the other and date of final conference between the parties. Application should be signed by the highest officer of the carrier who has been designated to handle disputes under the Railway Labor Act, or by the chief executive of the labor organization, whichever party files the application. These applications, after preliminary investigation in the Board's offices, are given docket number in series “A” and the cases are assigned for mediation to Board members or to mediators on the Board's staff.

[11 FR 177A-923, Sept. 11, 1946. Redesignated at 13 FR 8740, Dec. 30, 1948, as amended at 64 FR 40287, July 26, 1999]
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin
J. Himmelhaver, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Kevin J. Himmelhaver
--------------------------------

Kevin J. Himmelhaver
Executive Vice President,
  Chief Financial Officer
  and Secretary
August 12, 2002


                                       22
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4553 

To hold individuals convicted of Federal offenses during public gatherings 

resulting in riots financially liable for the cost of Federal policing, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2020 

Mr. COTTON (for himself and Mrs. LOEFFLER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To hold individuals convicted of Federal offenses during public gatherings resulting in riots financially liable for the 

cost of Federal policing, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Support Peaceful Pro5 test Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION. 

7 In this Act, the term ‘‘covered Federal offense’’, with 

8 respect to an individual, means a Federal offense related 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4553 IS

1 to the conduct of the individual at and during the course 

2 of a public gathering— 

3 (1) in connection with which a riot (as defined 

4 in section 2102 of title 18, United States Code) oc5 curs; and 

6 (2) with respect to which a Federal law enforce7 ment officer was engaged in policing activity. 

8 SEC. 3. ORDER OF RESTITUTION. 

9 In the case of an individual convicted of a covered 

10 Federal offense, the court shall, in addition to the penalty 

11 for such conviction, order the individual to pay an order 

12 of restitution to the appropriate Federal law enforcement 

13 agency in an amount that is equal to the cost of the polic14 ing activity engaged in by the Federal law enforcement 

15 agency, as determined by the court. 

16 SEC. 4. INELIGIBILITY FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED UNEM17 PLOYMENT BENEFITS. 

18 In the case of an individual convicted of a covered 

19 Federal offense, following the date of such conviction, such 

20 individual shall not be eligible for any unemployment bene21 fits which are financed in whole or in part with Federal 

22 funds during the COVID–19 public health emergency (as 

23 such term is defined in section 2102 of the CARES Act 

24 (15 U.S.C. 9021)), including any Federal Pandemic UnVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:52 Sep 10, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4553.IS S4553

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4553 IS

1 employment Compensation under section 2104 of the 

2 CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9023). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### SCHWING v McCLURE et Tees.

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21493.

Decided April 10, 1929

Syllabus by

ALLEN, J

SCHOOLS & SCHOOL DISTRICTS

(530 B) Members of a board of education of a school district are public officers, whose duties are prescribed by law. Their contractional powers are defined by the statutory limitations existing thereon, and they have no power except such as is expressly given, or such as is necessarily implied from the powers that are expressly given.

(530 B3) The members of the board of education of a school district are not authorized to convey or transfer to private parties, without consideration, any of the property of the school district, real or personal. Hence, the acceptance by such members of the board of education of a school district of a deed providing that if at any time the premises in question shall cease to be used for school purposes, the same shall at once vest in the said grantors, their heirs and assigns forever, is not effectual to constitute a public, school building erected upon such premises with public funds a part of the realty, so that such building passes with the realty upon reversion to the heirs of the grantor.

Judgment affirmed.

Kinkade, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ, concur. Marshall, CJ, dissents.
EXHIBIT 32.1






Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The undersigned, Daniel Dror, CEO and Chairman of American International Industries, Inc., a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010.






The undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all respects, the financial condition of American International Industries, Inc. and results of its operations.






Date:  November 15, 2010


Daniel Dror


Chairman


/s/ Daniel Dror
#### § 1603.305 Modification or withdrawal of Commission decision.

At any time, the Commission may modify or withdraw a decision for any reason provided that no petition for review in a United States Court of Appeals has been filed.
§ 15.100 What claims against the Department are covered by the FTCA? ( a ) The FTCA is a limited waiver of sovereign immunity that allows claims for money damages against the Department for negligent acts or omissions of its employees acting within the course and scope of their employment. Subject to the exception set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, all such claims against the Department should be handled under the procedures in this subpart.
( b ) In instances where a third party has agreed to insure the Federal government, such as under a U.S. Government Car Rental Agreement, claimants are required to pursue those claims in accordance with such agreements.
§ 460.11 Environmental control and life support systems. ( a ) An operator must provide atmospheric conditions adequate to sustain life and consciousness for all inhabited areas within a vehicle. The operator or flight crew must monitor and control the following atmospheric conditions in the inhabited areas or demonstrate through the license or permit process that an alternate means provides an equivalent level of safety— ( 1 ) Composition of the atmosphere, which includes oxygen and carbon dioxide, and any revitalization;
( 2 ) Pressure, temperature and humidity;
( 3 ) Contaminants that include particulates and any harmful or hazardous concentrations of gases, or vapors; and
( 4 ) Ventilation and circulation.
( b ) An operator must provide an adequate redundant or secondary oxygen supply for the flight crew.
( c ) An operator must ( 1 ) Provide a redundant means of preventing cabin depressurization; or
( 2 ) Prevent incapacitation of any of the flight crew in the event of loss of cabin pressure.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATE
      OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Solely
      for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Principal
      Executive Officer of Auriga Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify
      that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
      Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/ Philip
              S.
              PesinPhilip
                S. PesinChief
                Executive Officer


November
        9, 2007







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Auriga Laboratories, Inc. and will be retained by Auriga Laboratories, Inc.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT 

OF 

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

Janice K. Brewer 

Governor 

1110 West Washington Street • Phoenix, Arizona 85007 

(602) 771-2300 • www.azdeq.gov Benjamin H. Grumbles 

Director 

December 28, 2009 

Ms. Laura Yoshii 

Acting Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

Mail Code ORA-l 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

RE: Pintl ;~~~y,,~reaBoundary Recommendations-Request for Additional Time 

Dear~
 

Arizona requests a 30-day extension of time to submit its initial round of designation 

recommendations, pursuant to Section 107(d) of the Clean Air Act, for the National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards for 24-hour PMIO and annual PM2.5 Nonattainment Areas in Pinal County. 

If you have questions or need more information, please contact me at (602) 771-2203 or Nancy 

Wrona, Air Quality Division Director, at 771-2308. 

Sincerely, 

Benjamin H. Grumbles 

Director 

Northern Regional Office Southern Regional Office 

1801 W. Route 66 • Suite 117· Flagstaff, AZ. 86001 400 West Congress Street· Suite 433 • Tucson, AZ 85701 

(928) 779-0313 (520) 628-6733 

Printed on recycled paper
#### KANTON v. MITCHELL

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist., Cuyahoga Co.

No. 8795.

Decided Oct. 8, 1928.

■ Wm. J. McDermott, Cleveland, for Kan-ion.

C. A. Tsangadas, Cleveland, for Mitchell.

VICKERY, J.

It is clear that the judgment is erroneous and must be reversed even though under the record in this case the corporation had assumed all the liabilities and indebtedness of Mitchell. This did not exempt Mtchell from his obligation unless plaintiff ‘had entered into a contract of novation, and there is nothing in the record to show that, and the mere fact that plaintiff had a claim against the corporation by reason of its assumption of this obligation, even though she brought suit and procured a judgment, if that judgment was not paid, would not bar her right to recover against Mitchell, and it could not in any case be res adjudicata, but it is simply a case where two parties are liable for the same obligation and she could bring as many suits as there were parties liable, and until she collected from one of them, she could maintain a suit against the other. The record shows that she did not collect for the goods lost and there is no reason in the world why she should not have a judgment against Mitchell.

Sullivan, P. J. and Levine, J., concur.
EXHIBIT
      32.1






Statement
      Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The
      undersigned, Daniel Dror, CEO and Chairman of American International Industries,
      Inc., a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required
      by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the
      following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ended
      September 30, 2007.






The
      undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
      information contained in the above quarterly report fairly presents, in all
      respects, the financial condition of American International Industries, Inc.
      and
      results of its operations.






Date:  November
      19, 2007


Daniel
      Dror


Chairman/s/
      Daniel Dror
§ 1614.503 Enforcement of final Commission decisions. ( a ) *Petition for enforcement.* A complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of a decision issued under the Commission's appellate jurisdiction. The petition shall be submitted to the Office of Federal Operations. The petition shall specifically set forth the reasons that lead the complainant to believe that the agency is not complying with the decision.
( b ) *Compliance.* On behalf of the Commission, the Office of Federal Operations shall take all necessary action to ascertain whether the agency is implementing the decision of the Commission. If the agency is found not to be in compliance with the decision, efforts shall be undertaken to obtain compliance.
( c ) *Clarification.* On behalf of the Commission, the Office of Federal Operations may, on its own motion or in response to a petition for enforcement or in connection with a timely request for reconsideration, issue a clarification of a prior decision. A clarification cannot change the result of a prior decision or enlarge or diminish the relief ordered but may further explain the meaning or intent of the prior decision.
( d ) *Referral to the Commission.* Where the Director, Office of Federal Operations, is unable to obtain satisfactory compliance with the final decision, the Director shall submit appropriate findings and recommendations for enforcement to the Commission, or, as directed by the Commission, refer the matter to another appropriate agency.
( e ) *Commission notice to show cause.* The Commission may issue a notice to the head of any Federal agency that has failed to comply with a decision to show cause why there is noncompliance. Such notice may request the head of the agency or a representative to appear before the Commission or to respond to the notice in writing with adequate evidence of compliance or with compelling reasons for non-compliance.
( f ) *Certification to the Office of Special Counsel.* Where appropriate and pursuant to the terms of a memorandum of understanding, the Commission may refer the matter to the Office of Special Counsel for enforcement action.
( g ) *Notification to complainant of completion of administrative efforts.* Where the Commission has determined that an agency is not complying with a prior decision, or where an agency has failed or refused to submit any required report of compliance, the Commission shall notify the complainant of the right to file a civil action for enforcement of the decision pursuant to Title VII, the ADEA, the Equal Pay Act, the Rehabilitation Act, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, or the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act and to seek judicial review of the agency's refusal to implement the ordered relief pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 701 *et seq.,* and the mandamus statute, 28 U.S.C. 1361, or to commence de novo proceedings pursuant to the appropriate statutes.
[57 FR 12646, Apr. 10, 1992, as amended at 89 FR 11172, Feb. 14, 2024]