alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA No. 00-921; MM Docket No. 99-338; RM-9746] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule making; withdrawal. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document dismisses a petition for rule making filed by Elgin FM Limited Partnership requesting the allotment of Channel 232C3 at Shiner, Texas.                         *See*64 FR 68662, December 8, 1999. Elgin FM Limited Partnership withdrew its interest in the allotment of Channel 232C3 at Shiner, Texas. With this action, this proceeding is terminated.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This is a summary of the Commission's Report and Order, MM Docket No. 99-338, adopted April 19, 2000, and released April 25, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the Commission's Reference Center, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805. 

Federal Communications Commission.

John A. Karousos, 

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 00-12257 Filed 5-15-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Kuhlman 1997 consolidated balance sheet and statement of income (loss) and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         6,529
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,916
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,726
<INVENTORY>                                    71,282
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               200,267
<PP&E>                                         230,894
<DEPRECIATION>                                 105,368
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 461,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          140,202
<BONDS>                                        116,257
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       16,601
<OTHER-SE>                                     157,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   461,318
<SALES>                                        643,440
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               643,440
<CGS>                                          495,220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  495,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               472
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             9,256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                46,502
<INCOME-TAX>                                   18,573
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            27,929
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   27,929
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.75


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32
 
  Date: May 6, 2011
    /s/ TERRY G. ROUSSELTerry G. RousselChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of
Cornerstone Ventures, Inc., Managing Member of
Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC, the Managing Member of
Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLCDate: May 6, 2011
    /s/ SHARON C. KAISERSharon C. KaiserChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of
Cornerstone Ventures, Inc., Managing Member of
Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC, the Managing Member of
Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC 19
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Semi-annual report**
 
SuDoc:PREX 29.1:
Item Number:0857-U-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000933836
 
September 2012� March 2013 | March� September 2013
September 2013� March 2014 | April �September 2014
October 2014� March 2015 | April �September 2015
October2015 � March 2016 | April� September 2016
 
December 5, 2017
§ 1471.935 Debarring official. ( a ) *Debarring official* means an agency official who is authorized to impose debarment. A debarring official is either— ( 1 ) The agency head; or
( 2 ) An official designated by the agency head.
( b ) [Reserved]
PMN Sanitized file of Daphnia magna 48-hour acute t oxicity study
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 6075

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TROY RAYNARD ALEXANDER , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Catherine C. Eagles , District Judge. ( 1:15

- cr - 00103

- CCE; 1:20

- cv - 00567

- CCE

- LPA )

Submitted : January 31, 2023 Decided: June 1, 2023

Before DIAZ, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Troy Raynard Alexander, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6075 Doc: 13 Filed: 06/01/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Troy Raynard Alexander seeks to appeal the district court’s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion and his subsequent motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by dem onstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner mus t demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Alexander has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6075 Doc: 13 Filed: 06/01/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
[No. 20623-8-III.

Division Three.

December 26, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Ronald Lee Eldredge, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 01-1-00129-2, Carolyn A. Brown, J., entered October 24, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, J., concurred in by Schultheis and Kurtz, JJ.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO JAVIER LUNA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-72002

Agency No. A030-458-275

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 14, 2010** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 

Francisco Javier Luna, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

FILED

JAN 12 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-72002

§ 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Mielewczyk v. Holder, 575 F.3d 992,

994 (9th Cir. 2009), and we grant the petition for review. 

The statute of conviction, proscribes, among other offenses, an “offer to . . .

transfer marijuana.” See Ariz. Rev. Stats. § 13-3405(A)(4). It therefore includes a

solicitation offense, see Mielewczyk, 575 F.3d at 998 n.4, and is not categorically a

drug trafficking offense, see United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 247 F.3d 905, 909

(9th Cir. 2001) (en banc), superseded on other grounds by U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 cmt.

n.4 (2002), as recognized in Guerrero-Silva v. Holder, 599 F.3d 1090, 1092-93

(9th Cir. 2010). The agency therefore erred insofar as it concluded that a

conviction under Ariz. Rev. Stats. § 13-3405 is categorically an aggravated felony

drug trafficking crime under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B).

 Luna adequately exhausted this issue before the BIA and presented it on

appeal, see Vizcarra-Ayala v. Mukasey, 514 F.3d 870, 873-74 (9th Cir. 2008);

Abassi v. INS, 305 F.3d 1028, 1032 (9th Cir. 2002); see also Huerta-Guevara v.

Ashcroft, 321 F.3d 883, 886 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Because it is unclear whether the agency applied the modified categorical

approach, we remand for further proceedings. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16

(2002). In light of our disposition, we do not reach Luna’s remaining contentions. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:


(1)      Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-41532) pertaining to the Equity Incentive Plan and to the Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,


(2)      Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-66380) pertaining to the Coelacanth Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,


(3)  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-168678) pertaining to the Equity Incentive Plan and to the Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,


(4)  Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-67294) of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,


(5)  Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-108855) of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,


(6)  Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-111821) of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,


(7)  Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-144933) of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and


(8)  Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-171953) of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


of our reports dated March 15, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., included in this annual report (Form 10-K) of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Houston, Texas


March 15, 2011
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00085-CV

Eric Ross, Appellant

v.

Conn’s Appliances, Inc. d/b/a Conn’s Homeplus, Appellee

FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-GN-20-007614, THE HONORABLE DANIELLA DESETA LYTTLE, JUDGE

PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellee Conn’s Appliances, Inc. d/b/a Conn’s Homeplus has filed an agreed

motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the agreed motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Justices Baker, Triana, and Kelly

Dismissed on Agreed Motion

Filed: February 28, 2024
SERVED: JUNE 10, 2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / RTjvlb !T OF^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS ;:;::;:iv9ii[?J.lQ?;-

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

COLGAN AIR, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09EA0018 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS NO. FAA-2009-0582 

fii : 

NOTICE OF PREHEARING CONFERENCE 

A Prehearing Telephone Conference is scheduled on July 13, 2011, at 3:00 p.m., Eastern 

Time. 

All parties should be prepared to discuss all issues and facts at issue. Each party shall 

ensure that the Judge receives, no later than June 28, 2011, a copy of each document that party 

has provided to the other party but not the Judge. 

Pursuant to Section 556 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 556(c)(8), each 

party shall be represented by someone who has authority to negotiate concerning resolution of all 

issues in controversy. 

SO ORDERED. 

Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP09EA0018 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICiELlST 

ORIGINAL &|»|lifJE|iCOPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 ;. 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 ;:,., , 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite mWoQ^ 

ONECOiPV 

Mark A. Dombroff & Charles W. Ryan, III, 

Respondent's Counsel 

Dombroff Gilmore Jaques & French, P.C. 

1676 International Drive - Penthouse 

McLean, VA 22102 

TEL: 703-336-8700 

FAX: 703-336-8750 

Christian L. Lewerenz, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, AEA-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3273 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room El 2-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or byn 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., \V| 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

. . 1 courier, use the following address: Federal 

»|lM|htBdilding - Suite'ZWIOOO, Washington, 

- 2 -
#### McCormack v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Co.

(No. 1)

*484*Richter, Lord & Levy,*for plaintiff.

*Barnes, Dechert, Price, Myers & Rhoads,*for defendant.

April 7, 1958.

Alessandroni, P. J.,

This is an action in trespass. The case was duly placed on the consolidated trial list and subsequently ordered for pretrial conference. After the conference, defendant filed interrogatories upon plaintiff. Plaintiff has objected on two grounds, that leave of court is required for further discovery after pretrial conference and that the interrogatories violate the provisions of Pa. R. C. P. 4011(a)(6).

The ordering of a case for pretrial requires a certificate from the party filing the order that all further discovery is waived, except by leave of court: Pretrial Rule, Pll. Defendant’s contention is that its right of discovery cannot be cut off by plaintiff’s action.

Defendant’s contention would nullify the purpose of pretrial rules. If defendant has not concluded the discovery phase of the controversy, he may not stand mute in the face of the pretrial certificate, a copy of which must be served on him. Defendant’s appearance at the pretrial conference can only be considered as a joinder by defendant to plaintiff’s certificate.

Why defendant has delayed discovery for such a long period does not appear. If defendant’s' purpose is delay, then the pretrial rules assume greater significance in preventing the delay.

We therefore hold that no discovery proceedings may be instituted after a case has been ordered for pretrial, unless a party presents good and sufficient reasons for delaying the pretrial conference itself, or obtains leave of court to proceed.

*Order*

And now, to wit, April 7, 1958, plaintiff’s objections to defendant’s interrogatories are sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4804 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4804

 To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 
to add Rhode Island to the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 19, 2020

  Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Whitehouse) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 
to add Rhode Island to the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rhode Island Fishermen's Fairness 
Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. ADDITION OF RHODE ISLAND TO THE MID-ATLANTIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT 
              COUNCIL.

    Section 302(a)(1)(B) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation 
and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1852(a)(1)(B)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``Rhode Island,'' after ``States of'';
            (2) by inserting ``Rhode Island,'' after ``except North 
        Carolina,'';
            (3) by striking ``21'' and inserting ``23''; and
            (4) by striking ``13'' and inserting ``14''.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 48098-7-I.

Division One.

December 23, 2002.]

#### The City of Everett, *Respondent,*v. Manuel Rhodes, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 00-1-00987-3, Kenneth L. Cowsert, J., entered January 3, 2001. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Grosse, J., concurred in by Ellington and Appelwick, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Larry Wilcox, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of UC Hub, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in exchange act rules 13a-15(e) and 15d- 15(f)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;



c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: June 14, 2008



/s/ Larry Wilcox

Larry Wilcox,

Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. JORDAN MICHAEL WALLICK, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 575 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 30th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
§ 1472.505 How are violations of this part determined for recipients who are individuals? An individual recipient is in violation of the requirements of this part if the Agency Director determines, in writing, that— ( a ) The recipient has violated the requirements of subpart C of this part; or
( b ) The recipient is convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any award activity.
§ 102.158 Agency requests for administrative offsets and cooperation with other Federal agencies. Unless otherwise prohibited by law, the Agency may request that monies due and payable to a debtor by another Federal agency be administratively offset in order to collect debts owed the Agency by the debtor. In requesting an administrative offset, the Agency will provide the other Federal agency holding funds of the debtor with written certification stating: ( a ) That the debtor owes the Board a debt (including the amount of debt); and
( b ) That the Agency has complied with the applicable Federal Claims Collection Standards, including any hearing or review.