alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4825 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4825

To provide clarification with respect to the effective date of Medicare 
        coverage of COVID-19 vaccines without any cost-sharing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 21 (legislative day, October 19), 2020

 Mr. Reed (for himself and Mrs. Capito) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide clarification with respect to the effective date of Medicare 
        coverage of COVID-19 vaccines without any cost-sharing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Access to COVID-19 Vaccines 
for Seniors Act''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE OF MEDICARE COVERAGE OF COVID-19 VACCINES 
              WITHOUT ANY COST-SHARING.

    Effective as if included in the enactment of the CARES Act (Public 
Law 116-136; 42 U.S.C. 13951 note), section 3713(d) of such Act is 
amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: ``or 
authorized for emergency use under section 564 of the Federal Food, 
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3)''.
                                 <all>
```
Bd pe

—S 9 Noo3Y

064
oO

wr

ENINSULA AREA, ALASKA

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Released to open file

2

jee ee ew ee ee RO 4

100 ie} 100 200 300 miles

Scale

INDEX MAP OF ALASKA SHOWING LOCATION OF SEWARD PENINSULA AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL
SURVEYS, 1968. SEE DETAILED INDEX FOR ACTUAL COVERAGE.

64°45'
165°00
Flown and compiled by Lockwood , Kessler, — :
and Bartlett, Inc., 1968. s en

AEROMAGNETIC MAP AND PROFILES OF PART OF THE
SEWARD PENINSULA ALASKA

N SHEET NUMBER 3 0F //
\ ) LKB 1968
y j 3e0
ay i:
This map is preliminary \ fi,
and has not been edited &
or reviewed for conformity ee ny

to Geological Survey standards
#### § 404.1 Scope.

This part establishes procedures for issuing regulations and for filing a petition for waiver or petition for rulemaking to the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation.

[Doc. No. FAA-2016-6761, Amdt. No. 404-6, 83 FR 28534, June 20, 2018]
#### § 61.417 Will my flight instructor certificate with a sport pilot rating list aircraft category and class ratings?

Your flight instructor certificate does not list aircraft category and class ratings. When you successfully pass the practical test for a flight instructor certificate with a sport pilot rating, regardless of the light-sport aircraft privileges you seek, the FAA will issue you a flight instructor certificate with a sport pilot rating without any category and class ratings. The FAA will provide you with a logbook endorsement for the category and class of light-sport aircraft you are authorized to provide training in.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael D. Cahill, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Michael D. Cahill
-----------------------------------------
Michael D. Cahill
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
November 12, 2004

                                       26
# EUR-Lex - 31997D0795 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31997D0795

**97/795/EC: Commission Decision of 12 November 1997 accepting the application by the Italian Republic on the time limit for paying the advance aid to industrial tomato processors (Only the Italian text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 323 , 26/11/1997 P. 0037 - 0037 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 12 November 1997 accepting the application by the Italian Republic on the time limit for paying the advance aid to industrial tomato processors (Only the Italian text is authentic) (97/795/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 504/97 of 19 March 1997 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 as regards the system of production aid for products processed from fruit and vegetables (1), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1491/97 (2), and in particular Article 13 (2) thereof,

Whereas Article 13 (2) of Regulation (EC) No 504/97 lays down that, at the request of a Member State, the time limit by which the competent body must pay the advance aid may be extended, with the agreement of the Commission, from 30 to 45 days where, for duly justified reasons of verification, the shorter time limit cannot be met;

Whereas Italy, on the basis of various information notified to the Commission regarding the need for controls on its territory has asked to benefit from this provision for the 1997/98, 1998/99 and 1999/2000 marketing years; whereas, having studied the said information, it would appear necessary to accept the application made by Italy;

Whereas this authorization is valid for the 1997/98, 1998/99 and 1999/2000 marketing years, provided that the conditions relating to controls in Italy remain unchanged,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1. The Italian Republic is hereby allowed to apply the provision in the fourth subparagraph of Article 13 (2) of Regulation (EC) No 504/97.

2. This authorization is valid for the 1997/98, 1998/99 and 1999/2000 marketing years as long as the relevant conditions relating to controls remain unchanged.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Italian Republic.

Done at Brussels, 12 November 1997.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 78, 20. 3. 1997, p. 14.

(2) OJ L 202, 30. 7. 1997, p. 27.
# EUR-Lex - 31995F1127(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995F1127(01)

**Council Act of 26 July 1995 drawing up the Convention based on Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention) **

*
Official Journal C 316 , 27/11/1995 P. 0001 - 0001 *

COUNCIL ACT of 26 July 1995 drawing up the Convention based on Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention) (95/C 316/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article K.3 (2) (c) and Article K.1 (9) therof,

Whereas for the purposes of achieving the objectives of the Union the Member States regard the establishment of a European Police Office as a matter of common interest;

Has decided on the drawing up of the Convention, the text of which is annexed, which has been signed today by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the Union;

RECOMMENDS that it be adopted by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

Done at Brussels, 26 July 1995.

For the Council

The President

J. A. BELLOCH JULBE
#### § 49.61 Applicability.

The FAA Civil Aviation Registry is designated under Section 3 of the Cape Town Treaty Implementation Act of 2004, as the entry point for authorizing the transmission of information to the International Registry affecting United States civil aircraft, aircraft assigned a U.S. registration number and engines with a rated shaft horsepower of 550 or the equivalent thereof. This subpart applies to the transmission of information to the International Registry; the filing of the Entry Point filing form, AC Form 8050-135; and the filing of documents eligible for recording under subparts C and D of part 49.
Seatac Digital Resources, Inc



 Exhibit 10.6 
 Seatac Digital Resources, Inc. 
 November 1, 2009 
 Sky Kelley, President 
 America’s
Minority Health Network, Inc. 
 345 North Maple Drive, Suite 208 
 Beverly Hills, California 90210 
 Re: Short term funding assurance

 Dear Sky: 
 SEATAC,
as a principal shareholder in AMHN, Inc. and a primary vendor of America’s Minority Health Network, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of AMHN, Inc., acknowledges that AMHN, Inc. is in the process of raising investment capital for the expansion of
America’s Minority Health Network, Inc. Although expanding rapidly as it executes on its business plan, America’s Minority Health Network, Inc. has no material cash resources as of this date. 
 To assure that America’s Minority Health Network, Inc. has adequate day to day operating capital over the next six months, we at SEATAC are
committed to loan America’s Minority Health Network, Inc. up to an additional five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) on an “as needed basis” in the form of a second bridge loan. 
 Sincerely, 
 SEATAC DIGITAL RESOURCES,
INC. 
  

	
	 /s/    Robin Tjon

	Robin Tjon
	President

 555 H St., Suite H, Eureka, CA 95501 —
 707-444-6619 — FAX 707-444-6619
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: Robin Dunkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, James Hirtz/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Bill Schrock/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, John Bradfield/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Kelley Spence/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/03/2012 12:02 PM

Subject: RE: Pulp and Paper RTR draft final rule

________________________________________

Hi Robin,

Can we also get the revised risk assessment and any supporting documents/memos/TSDs, 

including the response to comments document?

Thanks,

Cortney
#### § 1201.1 Carrier.

The term *carrier* includes any express company, sleeping car company, carrier by railroad, subject to the Interstate Commerce Act (24 Stat. 379, as amended; 49 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.*), and any company which is directly or indirectly owned or controlled by or under common control with any carrier by railroad and which operates any equipment or facilities or performs any service (other than trucking service) in connection with the transportation, receipt, delivery, elevation, transfer in transit, refrigeration or icing, storage, and handling of property transported by railroad, and any receiver, trustee, or other individual or body, judicial or otherwise, when in the possession of the business of any such “carrier.”
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1031 

CAF 10-00645 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF KIMBERLY MARVIN, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JEFFREY L. KILMER, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

---------------------------------------- 

IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY L. KILMER, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V

 

KIMBERLY MARVIN, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

 

ROSEMARIE RICHARDS, GILBERTSVILLE, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT AND

PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Steuben County

(Marianne Furfure, A.J.), entered March 16, 2010. The order, among

other things, held Jeffery L. Kilmer in contempt of court. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs. 

Memorandum: Family Court properly found respondent-petitioner

(father) in contempt of court based upon his willful violation of a

prior order directing the return of the parties’ son to the custody of

petitioner-respondent (mother). “A careful review of the evidence,

both direct and circumstantial, fully supports [the court’s finding

that the father willfully] violated a clear and unequivocal mandate of

the court” (Labanowski v Labanowski, 4 AD3d 690, 694). The evidence

establishes that the father was aware of the terms of the prior order

and, in the court’s words, “he put in motion the events which resulted

in the child being removed from [the mother’s] home and placed in [the

father’s] home” (see Matter of Daniels v Guntert, 256 AD2d 940, 942). 

We reject the father’s further contention that the court erred in

conducting a confidential interview with the parties’ daughter (see

generally Matter of Lincoln v Lincoln, 24 NY2d 270, 272) and, in any

event, there is no indication that the court relied on that interview

in rendering its decision herein (see Matter of Bernelle P., 45 NY2d

937, 938). 

Entered: October 5, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
§ 33.8 Selection of engine power and thrust ratings. ( a ) Requested engine power and thrust ratings must be selected by the applicant.
( b ) Each selected rating must be for the lowest power or thrust that all engines of the same type may be expected to produce under the conditions used to determine that rating.
[Amdt. 33-3, 32 FR 3736, Mar. 4, 1967]
#### SOCKEL v BROWN

Ohio Appeals, 4th Dist, Lawrence Co

Decided Dec 20, 1928

A J Layne, Ironton, for Sockel.

Irish & Riley, Ironton, for Brown.

THOMAS, PJ

. The word, from the Latin pre and scriptio, means a former writing. At the time of the adoption of this fiction by the English courts the facilities for recording instruments of writing were not afforded as they are today and no doubt many deeds of conveyance were lost, as they are today.

At one time the land in controversy was furnace property. It was crossed by roads in almost every direction. The evidence as to the road in controversy is conflicting. One strong and almost controlling fact is that no public officer has ever exercised any authority over the road. For many years fences have been maintained across the road, which is inconsistent with the theory of its being public. No objection has ever been made by anyone to these fences.

Our conclusion is that altho the defendant at one time made some repairs on the road for his own convenience yet the use of the road was more by sufferance and permission of the owner than from any right in the defendant, who has other ways to travel to and from his land.

The injunction is therefore allowed as prayed for.

Middleton and Mauck, JJ, concur.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 30623 Summary Calendar

JERRY PAUL FRANCIS , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
JAMES M. LEBLANC, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS; SHERYL RANATZA, The Committee on Parole and Pardon Board, Chairperson , Defendant s
- Appellee s

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:15

- CV

- 411

Before SMITH, WIENER, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jerry Paul Francis , Louisiana prisoner # 86386, appeals from the district
court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as legally frivolous and for
failure to state a claim

. The district court dismissed without prejudice to Francis’s right to reassert his claims in a federal habeas corpus proceeding after exhausting available state court remedies. On appeal, Francis argues

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set f orth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 24, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-30623 Document: 00514928623 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/24/2019No. 18

- 30623

2 that (1) the Louisiana Parole and P ardon Board’s denial of parole contravened Graham v. Florida , 560 U.S. 48 (2010), and Miller v. Alabama , 567 U.S. 460 (2012), and (2) his challenge is cognizable under § 1983. We review the dismissal de novo. See Geiger v. Jowers , 404 F.3d 371, 373 (5th Cir. 2005). Because the Louisiana Parole and Pardon Board determined that Francis was eligible for parole and provided him with some meaningful opportunity to obtain release, he has not shown a violation under Graham and Miller

. See Graham , 560 U.S. at 7 5. As his complaint was frivolous on this ground, it was properly subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and 1915A(b)(1). See Morris v. McAllester , 702 F.3d 187, 189 (5th Cir. 2012). We therefore do not need to consider the district co urt’s alternative basis for dismissal. See Sojourner T. v. Edwards , 974 F.2d 27, 30 (5th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. Case: 18-30623 Document: 00514928623 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/24/2019
Searched for **http://www.ihs.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.ihs.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Order filed March 21, 2013

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ____________

No. 11-12-00326-CR

__________

AMMIE LUCILLE SMITH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR137834

O R D E R

Ammie Lucille Smith, through her court-appointed trial counsel, filed a timely notice of 

appeal. Smith’s trial counsel was thereafter permitted by the trial court to withdraw as counsel 

for Smith. The trial court has not appointed counsel for appeal. When this court notified Smith 

that her brief was due, we received a pro se response indicating that Smith had contacted the trial 

court regarding the appointment of an attorney and that she needed time to find an attorney. We 

abate this appeal.
2

We abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court so that it may determine the 

following:

1. Whether Smith desires to prosecute her appeal;

2. Whether Smith is indigent;

3. If not indigent, whether Smith has retained counsel for her appeal; and

4. If indigent, whether Smith desires to have counsel appointed to represent her in 

this appeal or whether, after being warned of the dangers and disadvantages of 

self-representation, Smith competently and intelligently chooses to exercise the 

right to represent herself. 

The trial court is directed to make appropriate findings and recommendations and to appoint 

counsel if appropriate. The trial court clerk is directed to prepare and forward to this court a 

clerk’s record containing the findings, recommendations, and any orders of the trial court. If a 

hearing is held, the court reporter is directed to prepare and forward to this court the reporter’s 

record from the hearing. These records are due to be filed in this court on or before April 22, 

2013. Smith’s brief will be due to be filed in this court within thirty days after the date this 

appeal is reinstated.

The appeal is abated.

PER CURIAM

March 21, 2013

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.
* * We grant the request of The Yello w stone Mountain Club, LLC (YMC) for amendment of the exemption granted by Order 20 12

- 2

- 1

, to the extent necessary to permit YMC to make use of more than one aircraft as needs may dictate

. Except to the extent authorized here, the authority granted remains subject to the conditions of Order 20 12

- 2

- 1

. Approved under assigned authority on

June 1 3 , 201 4 **

Director, Office of International Aviation
#### DeMARIA v NETH

Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Summit Co

No. 1634.

Decided May 31, 1929

Gurney, Gurney & Gurney, Cleveland and Wm. A. Slater, Akron, for DeMaria.

Dustin, McKeehan, Merrick, Arter & Stewart, Cleveland, for Neth.

PER CURIAM

As has been said, there is not a syllable of testimony in the record in reference to said objectionable lines, and there is nothing in the record, except the lines themselves, to suggest any meaning or opinion of the witness or that the jurors probably understood that they were intended to express such opinion of-the witness as is claimed for them; but in any event, from a reading and consideration of the whole record, we are satisfied that if it was error to admit the sketch with the objectionable lines thereon, it was not prejudicial error in this case; and there being no other claim of error, the judgment is affirmed.

Funk, PJ, and Washburn, J, concur. Pardee, J, not participating.
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Financial Corporation (the
        "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Richard
        R. Sawyer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
        18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
                  Richard R. SawyerRichard
                  R. SawyerChief
                  Financial OfficerMay
                  10, 2007
§ 450.35 Means of compliance. ( a ) Prior to application acceptance, a means of compliance must be accepted by the Administrator for the following: ( 1 ) Section 450.115(b)(1) regarding flight safety analyses;
( 2 ) Section 450.139(e)(1) regarding toxic hazards for flight;
( 3 ) Section 450.145(b) regarding highly-reliable flight safety system;
( 4 ) Section 450.163(a)(1) regarding lightning hazard mitigation; and
( 5 ) Section 450.187(e)(1) regarding toxic hazards mitigation for ground operations.
( b ) A person requesting acceptance of a proposed means of compliance outside a license application must submit the proposed means of compliance to the FAA in a form and manner acceptable to the Administrator.