alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 2.6


                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

       CANADA BUSINESS                                    LOI SUR LES SOCIETES
       CORPORATIONS ACT                                 COMMERCIALES CANADIENNES
           FORM 4                                              FORMULE 4
     ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT                                CLAUSES MODIFICATRICES
     (SECTION 27 OR 171)                                  (ARTICLES 27 OU 171)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 - Name of Corporation -                      2 - Corporation No. -
    Denomination de la societe                     N(Degree) de la societe

iQ Power Technology Inc.                           309945-8



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 - The articles of the above-named        Les statuts de la societe ci-haut
 corporation are amended as follows:       mentionee sont modifies de la facon
                                           suivante:


A.   Pursuant to s.173(1)(h) of the Canada Business  Corporations Act, Article 3
     is amended to change the issued and  outstanding  common shares without par
     value of the Corporation through the consolidation of every 2.5 such shares
     into 1 share.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date               Signature                     Description of Office -
March 30, 2000     Signed "Gregory A. Sasges"    Description du poste
                                                 Secretary
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY                      A L'USAGE DU MINISTERE SEULEMENT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               Filed - Deposee

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





In
      connection with the periodic report of Asiamart, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kwan Pui Wong, Chief Financial Officer
      (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, hereby certify
      as
      of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350
      of
      the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.





Date:  November
                19, 2007
            /s/
                Kwan Pui WongKwan
                Pui WongChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### § 13.7 Waiver of rights.

Employees cannot waive, nor may contractors induce employees to waive, their rights under Executive Order 13706 or this part.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

# AGENCY:

International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Commerce invites U.S. companies to participate in the following overseas trade missions that they also explain at the following website:                         *http://www.its.doc.gov/​doctm.*                         For a comprehensive description of the trade mission, obtain a copy of the mission statement from the project officer listed below. The recruitment and selection of private sector participants will be conducted according to the Statement of Policy Governing Department of Commerce Overseas Trade Missions announced by Secretary Daley on March 3, 1997.                     

## The Aerospace Executive Service at the Farnborough International Air Show 2000 

United Kingdom 

July 24-30, 2000 

*For Further Information Contact:*                         Roderick A. Hirsch at the Department of Commerce in Long Beach, CA; Telephone number: (562) 980-4566 or Fax: (562) 980-4561.                     

## Housing Business Development Mission to China 

Hong Kong, Shanghai, Chendu & Beijing 

June 5-14, 2000 

*For Further Information Contact:*                        Chris Twarok at the Department of Commerce in Washington, DC; Telephone number: (202) 482-0377 or Fax: (202) 482-0382.                     

Anita Blackman, 

Director of Operations, Office of Domestic Operations. 

[FR Doc. 00-12077 Filed 5-12-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-FP-P
§ 67.303 Eye. Eye standards for a third-class airman medical certificate are: ( a ) Distant visual acuity of 20/40 or better in each eye separately, with or without corrective lenses. If corrective lenses (spectacles or contact lenses) are necessary for 20/40 vision, the person may be eligible only on the condition that corrective lenses are worn while exercising the privileges of an airman certificate.
( b ) Near vision of 20/40 or better, Snellen equivalent, at 16 inches in each eye separately, with or without corrective lenses.
( c ) Ability to perceive those colors necessary for the safe performance of airman duties.
( d ) No acute or chronic pathological condition of either eye or adnexa that interferes with the proper function of an eye, that may reasonably be expected to progress to that degree, or that may reasonably be expected to be aggravated by flying.
§ 91.144 Temporary restriction on flight operations during abnormally high barometric pressure conditions. ( a ) *Special flight restrictions.* When any information indicates that barometric pressure on the route of flight currently exceeds or will exceed 31 inches of mercury, no person may operate an aircraft or initiate a flight contrary to the requirements established by the Administrator and published in a Notice to Airmen issued under this section.
( b ) *Waivers.* The Administrator is authorized to waive any restriction issued under paragraph (a) of this section to permit emergency supply, transport, or medical services to be delivered to isolated communities, where the operation can be conducted with an acceptable level of safety.
[Amdt. 91-240, 59 FR 17452, Apr. 12, 1994; 59 FR 37669, July 25, 1994]
#### § 91.901 [Reserved]
# EUR-Lex - 31997R2199 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31997R2199

**Council Regulation (EC) No 2199/97 of 30 October 1997 amending Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 on the common organization of the markets in processed fruit and vegetable products **

*
Official Journal L 303 , 06/11/1997 P. 0001 - 0002 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 2199/97 of 30 October 1997 amending Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 on the common organization of the markets in processed fruit and vegetable products

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 43 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (3),

Whereas Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 (4) allocates fresh tomatoes by Member State and product group for the 1997/98 and 1998/99 marketing years; whereas, in the case of France, to adjust its quota of tinned whole peeled tomatoes and its quota of other products to the needs of its processing industry, the quota for tinned whole peeled tomatoes should be reduced by 15 000 tonnes and the quota for other products should be increased by the same amount; whereas the total quantities for these two product groups as set out in Article 6 (2) of the Regulation should also be adjusted as a result,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 is hereby amended as follows:

1. The second and third indents of the second subparagraph of Article 6 (2) shall be replaced by:

'- tinned whole peeled tomatoes:

1 321 119 tonnes

- other products:

929 890 tonnes.`

2. Annex III shall be replaced by the following:

'ANNEX III

Allocation of fresh tomatoes by Member State and by product group for the 1997/1998 and 1998/1999 marketing years

>TABLE>

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 15 June 1997.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 30 October 1997.

For the Council

The President

F. BODEN

(1) OJ C 266, 3. 9. 1997, p. 17.

(2) Opinion delivered on 22 October 1997 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(3) Opinion delivered on 29 October 1997 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(4) OJ L 297, 21. 11. 1996, p. 29.
§ 91.1715 Currency requirements and flight review. ( a ) The takeoff and landing currency requirements of § 61.57 of this chapter must be maintained in the Mitsubishi MU-2B series airplane. Takeoff and landings in other multiengine airplanes do not meet the takeoff and landing currency requirements for the Mitsubishi MU-2B series plane. Takeoff and landings in either the short-body or long-body Mitsubishi MU-2B model airplane may be credited toward takeoff and landing currency for both Mitsubishi MU-2B model groups.
( b ) Instrument experience obtained in other category and class of aircraft may be used to satisfy the instrument currency requirements of § 61.57 of this chapter for the Mitsubishi MU-2B series airplane.
( c ) Satisfactory completion of a flight review to satisfy the requirements of § 61.56 of this chapter is valid for operation of a Mitsubishi MU-2B series airplane only if that flight review is conducted in a Mitsubishi MU-2B series airplane or an MU-2B Simulator approved for landings with an approved course conducted under part 142 of this chapter. The flight review for Mitsubishi MU-2B series airplanes must include the *Special Emphasis Items,* and all items listed in the *Training Course Final Phase Check* in accordance with an approved MU-2B Training Program.
( d ) A person who successfully completes the Initial/transition, Requalification, or Recurrent training requirements under § 91.1705 of this chapter also meet the requirements of § 61.56 of this chapter and need not accomplish a separate flight review provided that at least 1 hour of the flight training was conducted in the Mitsubishi MU-2B series airplane or an MU-2B Simulator approved for landings with an approved course conducted under part 142 of this chapter.
[Docket FAA-2006-24981, Amdt. 91-344, 81 FR 61591, Sept. 7, 2016; Amdt. 91-344A, 82 FR 21472, May 9, 2017]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amalgamated Technologies,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Robert Ellin,  Chief  Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Robert Ellin
-----------------------
Name:  Robert Ellin
Title: President and Chief Financial Officer
       (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

Date:  August 22, 2005

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### MAXWELL v. MAXWELL.

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist., Cuyahoga Co.

Nos. 9386 and 9316

Decided Oct. 8, 1928.

David B.JLove, Fremont, and Smith, Olds, Smith & Shepherd, Cleveland, for plaintiff in error.

John A. Elden, Cleveland, for defendant in error.

LEVINE, J.

There is creditable evidence in the record tending to show the plaintiff'in error earned on an average of $600.00 per month. Upon a full hearing of all the evidence, pro and con, the court allowed the application of defendant in error for temporary alimony and granted her $100.00 per month during the pendency of the suit. Later plaintiff in error was cited to answer to a charge of contempt of court for non-compliance with the court’s order. Again evidence was heard' on both sides and at the conclusion of the evidence, the court committed plaintiff in error to the county jail for contempt of court.

Considerable discussion is devoted in brief of counsel on the right of plaintiff in error to have these eases reviewed and it is contended by defendant in error’s counsel that the Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction to consider on review an allowance for alimony pendente lite made by the court of Common Pleas. Plantiff in error’s counsel cites the court to the case of Weeden vs Weeden, 116 O. S. 524.

An examination of that case however, discloses that in that action there was a final divorce decree by the Common Pleas Court and not an application for alimony pendente lite.

The matter was fully gone into by the trial court and apparently the judge who had all the witnesses before him, saw fit to believe the version of Mrs. Maxwell in preference to the version of Mr. Maxwell, and made his ruling accordingly. We would not be justified upon the state of the record, in disturbing the judgment of the common pleas court and the same is therefore affirmed in both cases.

Sullivan, P. J. and Vickery, J. concur.
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 217 SSM 19 The People &c., Respondent, v. James M. Roshia, Jr. Appellant.

Submitted by Albert F. Lawrence, for appellant. Submitted by Alexander Lesyk, Esq., for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant was indicted by a grand jury, a sexual assault evidence kit was taken from the victim, and County Court's order directing defendant to provide a DNA sample was authorized by statute (CPL 240.40[2][b][v]). Accordingly, County Court did not err in

- 1 -- 2 - SSM 19

granting the People's application directing defendant to provide a buccal swab for testing. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur. Decided October 20, 2016

- 2 -
#### STATE ex SHELTON v INDUST COMM

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21484.

Decided May 29, 1929

Syllabus by

ROBINSON, J.

EMPLOYER & EMPLOYE

(250 Ic2) At a rehearing under 1465-90, GC, evidence taken upon oath, in the form of depositions before the Industrial Commission of Ohio or one of its referees, and filed in the case with the Commission, may be offered in evidence, by letter, by either the claimant or the state, and it thereupon becomes the mandatory duty of the Commission to pass upon its admissibility.

Marshall, CJ, Kinkade, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ, concur.
Customer Service Hotline: 1

- 800

- 438

- 2474 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

- 2029

January 13, 2015

The Honorable Dana Aunkst

Acting Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Pro tection

Rachel Carson State Office Building

P.O. Box 2063

Harrisburg, PA 17105

- 2063

Dear Acting Secretary Aunkst :

On December 4 , 2014

, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a

revision to the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Pennsylvania Department

of Environmental Protection. Th e SIP revision request s redesignation from nonattainment to

a ttainment, and approval of the maintenance plan of the Johnsto wn 1997 annual and the 2006 24

-

hour PM 2.5 area . EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technical ly

complete, and is reviewing it to prepare Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Rose Quinto

, Office

of Air Program Planning

, at (215) 81 4

- 2 182 . She is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

Sincerely,

/s/

David L. Arnold

, Acting Director

Air Protection Division

cc: Joyce E. Epps, Director, PADEP Bureau of Air Qual ity
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Alton L. Boynton, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 6, 2011





/s/ Alton L. BoyntonAlton L. BoyntonPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Principal Executive OfficerPrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer
#### Catharine Victory, Resp’t, *v.*Bridget Foran, App’lt.

*(New York Superior Court,*

*General Term,*

*Filed February, 1889.)*

1. Negligence—Landlord and tenant—Dangerous premises.

Where in an action by a tenant against a landlord to recover for injuries received from falling down a stairway on the leased premises, it is shown by plaintiff that the fall was occasioned by her dress catching on a nail in one of the steps, while she was descending the stairway, and that the agent of the defendant had notice of the condition of the stairway, *Held,*not error to refuse to dismiss the complaint.

3. Appeal—When order denying new trial not reviewed.

The court will not review on appeal an order denying a motion for a new trial, unless it has been formally entered, and appears in the printed case.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $1,500, rendered at trial term.

Action by plaintiff to recover for injuries received by falling down a stairway in defendant’s house. Plaintiff was a tenant of defendant, and, while descending the stairway, her dress caught on a nail protruding from one of the steps, and she was thrown to the bottom. The defendant’s agent had notice of the condition of the stairway.

*C. H. and F. L. Crawford,*for app’lt; *James A.*O’ *Gorman and Chrisfophei Fine,*for resp’t.

Truax, J.

Although the notice of appeal states that the defendant appeals from the judgment, and from the order refusing to grant a new trial, made after the verdict was rendered, yet the case does not contain any such order. We have frequently held that we will not review, on appeal; an order denying a motion for a new trial, unless that order shall have been formally entered, and appears in the printed case. There was no error in the way the case was presented to the jury. In fact, there are but two exceptions in the *28case; one on the admission of testimony, the other on the refusal to dismiss the complaint. The first exception was not referred to by the appellant on the argument. It was not well taken, because the testimony that the question brought forth tended to show, in a proper way, the defendant’s negligence. *Nor*was it error *to*refuse to dismiss the complaint. There was evidence that would warrant the jury in finding that the plaintiff was injured, without negligence. on her part, through the negligence of the defendant. While the damages seem to be quite large, we cannot gay that they are so large that the jury must have been influenced by prejudice or passion in awarding them.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to, the respondent.

All concur.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Eight Dollar Mountainquadrangle, Oregon : 7.5-minute series (topographic)**
 
2012 | 2014 | 2015 | 2017
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28/6:42123-C 6/
Item Number:0080-G-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000932635
 
January 31, 2018