### 31426 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 106 / Thursday, June 3, 2010 / Notices

Dated: May 24, 2010.

Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010–13373 Filed 6–2–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S**

**DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE**

**International Trade Administration**

**(A–560–802)**

**Certain Preserved Mushrooms from**
**Indonesia: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative** 
**Review**

**AGENCY :**  Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  David Goldberger or Kate Johnson, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4136 or (202) 482–4929, respectively.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
Background

On February 1, 2010, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published in the Federal Register a notice of ‘‘ Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review’’ of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from Indonesia for the period of review (POR), February 1, 2009, through January 31, 2010. See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review, 75 FR 5037 (February 1, 2010).

On March 1, 2010, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), the Department received a timely request from Monterey Mushrooms, Inc., a petitioner and a domestic interested party in the above– referenced proceeding, to conduct an
administrative review of the sales of PT Eka Timur Raya (ETIRA), PT Indo Evergreen Agro Business Corp., PT Karya Kompos Bagas, and Tuwuh Agung PT. Monterey Mushrooms, Inc. was the only party to request this
administrative review.

On March 30, 2010, the Department published in the Federal Register a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from Indonesia with respect to these companies. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for

Revocation in Part , 75 FR 15679 (March 30, 2010).

On May 14, 2010, Monterey Mushrooms, Inc. timely withdrew its request for review.

Rescission of Administrative Review

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if the parties that requested a review withdraw the request within 90 days of the date of publication of notice of initiation of the requested review. Monterey Mushrooms, Inc. withdrew its request for review before the 90-day deadline, and no other party requested
an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from Indonesia. Therefore, in response to Monterey Mushrooms, Inc.’s withdrawal of its request for review, and pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department is rescinding the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from Indonesia for the period February 1, 2009, through January 31, 2010.

Assessment

The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register

. Notification to Importers

This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility, under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2), to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping
duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order

This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.

This notice is published in accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).

Dated: May 27, 2010.
John M. Andersen, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.

[FR Doc. 2010–13436 Filed 6–2–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S**

**COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS**

**Notice of Meeting**

Established By Congress May 17, 1910.

The next meeting of the U.S.
Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for 17 June 2010, at 10 a.m. in the
Commission offices at the National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, NW., Washington DC, 20001–2728. Items of discussion may include buildings, parks and
memorials.

Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission
are available on our Web site: http:// www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the agenda and requests to submit written
or oral statements should be addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address; by e-mailing staff@cfa.gov; or by calling 202–504–2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.

Dated: May 26, 2010 in Washington DC.

Thomas Luebke,
AIA Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010–13176 Filed 6–2–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6330–01–M**

**CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY**
**COMMISSION**

**Notice of Meeting of Chronic Hazard Advisory Panel on Phthalates and**  **Phthalate Substitutes and Opportunity**
**for Public Comment**

**AGENCY :**  Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice of meeting.


### 31427 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 106 / Thursday, June 3, 2010 / Notices

**SUMMARY :**  The Consumer Product Safety Commission ( ‘‘ CPSC ’’ or ‘‘ Commission’’ ) announces the second meeting of the Chronic Hazard Advisory Panel (CHAP) on phthalates and phthalate substitutes. The Commission appointed this CHAP to study the effects on children’s health of all phthalates and phthalate alternatives as used in children’s toys and child care articles, pursuant to
section 108 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA) (Pub. L. 110–314). The public may submit written or oral comments on the issues to be considered by the

CHAP.

**DATES :**  The opportunity to present oral comments will be on July 26, 2010, from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. The remainder of the meeting will be from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on July 27 and from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. on July 28, 2010. Requests to present
oral comments must be filed with the Office of the Secretary no later than July 1, 2010. Written comments, and a written copy of the text of the oral comments, must be received no later than July 12, 2010. Commenters should limit their presentations to approximately 15 minutes, exclusive of any periods of questioning by the
members of the CHAP or the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) staff. The CHAP may further limit the time for any presentation and to impose
restrictions to avoid excessive duplication of presentations.

**ADDRESSES :**  The meeting will be in the fourth floor hearing room on July 26 and 27 and in room 410 on July 28, 2010, in
the Commission’s offices at 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland. Written comments, or requests to present oral comments and the written text of such comments, should be captioned ‘‘ CHAP on Phthalates ’’ and sent by electronic mail (e-mail) to cpscos@cpsc.gov, or mailed or delivered to the Office of the Secretary, ConsumerProduct Safety Commission, 4330 EastWest Highway, Bethesda, Maryland

20814.

Online Registration and Webcast: Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting are requested to preregister online at http:// www.cpsc.gov/cgibin/chap.aspx. This meeting will also be available live via webcast on July 26 and July 27, and by prerecorded webcast on July 28, 2010, at http://www.cpsc.gov/webcast

. Registration is not necessary to view the
webcast.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Concerning requests and procedures for oral presentations of comments: Rockelle Hammond, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone: (301) 504–6833; email cpscos@cpsc.gov. For all other

matters: Michael Babich, Directorate for Health Sciences, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD20814; telephone (301) 504–07253; email mbabich@cpsc.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The Commission has previously investigated potential risks posed to children from phthalate plasticizers, especially di (2- ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and diisononyl phthalate (DINP), which
were used to soften some children’s teethers, rattles, and toys made from polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Phthalates can leach from such products when they are mouthed by children, causing some phthalates to be ingested. In addition, children and adults can be exposed to phthalates from many sources, including consumer products, food, cosmetics, medical devices, and the environment. Certain phthalates have
been shown to cause adverse health effects, including birth defects, in laboratory animals. Section 108 of the CPSIA permanently prohibits the sale of

any ‘‘ children’s toy or child care article ’’ containing more than 0.1 percent of each of three specified phthalates—di- (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), and benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP). Section 108 of the CPSIA also prohibits on an interim basis the sale of any ‘‘ children’s toy that can be placed in a child’s mouth’’ or ‘‘ child
care articles ’’ containing more than 0.1 percent of each of three additional phthalates—diisononyl phthalate (DINP), diisodecyl phthalate (DIDP), and di-n-octyl phthalate (DnOP).

Section 108 of the CPSIA requires the

Commission to convene a CHAP ‘‘to study the effects on children’s health of all phthalates and phthalate alternatives as used in children’s toys and child care
articles. ’’ The CPSIA requires the CHAP to complete an examination of the full range of phthalates that are used in products for children and to: (i) Examine all of the potential health effects (including endocrine disrupting effects) of the full range of phthalates; (ii) consider the potential health effects of each of these phthalates both in
isolation and in combination with other phthalates; (iii) examine the likely levels of children’s, pregnant women’s, and others’ exposure to phthalates,
based on a reasonable estimation of
normal and foreseeable use and abuse of such products; (iv) consider the cumulative effect of total exposure to phthalates, both from children’s products and from other sources, such as personal care products; (v) review all relevant data, including the most recent, best-available, peer-reviewed, scientific studies of these phthalates and phthalate alternatives that employ objective data collection practices or employ other objective methods; (vi) consider the health effects of phthalates not only from ingestion but also as a result of dermal, hand-to-mouth, or other exposure; (vii) consider the level at which there is a reasonable certainty of no harm to children, pregnant women, or other susceptible individuals and their offspring, considering the best available science, and using sufficient safety factors to account for uncertainties regarding exposure and susceptibility of children, pregnant women, and other potentially susceptible individuals; and (viii) consider possible similar health effects of phthalate alternatives used in children’s toys and child care articles.

The CHAP’s examination must be conducted de novo, and the statute specifies completion of its examination within 18 months of appointment of the CHAP. The CHAP must review prior work on phthalates by the Commission, but the Commission’s prior work is not
to be considered determinative. Within 180 days after completing its examination, the CHAP shall report to
the Commission the results of the
examination and shall make
recommendations to the Commission regarding any phthalates (or combinations of phthalates or alternatives to phthalates) in addition to those permanently banned by the CPSIA
that the CHAP determines should be
declared hazardous substances.

The first meeting of the CHAP was on April 14–15, 2010. The second meeting of the CHAP will be on July 26–28, 2010, in the fourth floor hearing room at the Commission’s offices in Bethesda, MD ( see address above). The CHAP is seeking public comment on issues relating to the hazard, exposure, and risk posed by phthalates and phthalate substitutes from all sources of exposure, and especially in children’s products. The CHAP is especially interested in comments and data pertaining to:

1. Information on current and anticipated future uses of phthalates and phthalate substitutes in products, including market data, production levels, and the range of uses of specific phthalates and phthalate substitutes in different product types.

2. Data on the types and levels of phthalates and phthalate substitutes found in consumer products, cosmetics, pharmaceutical drugs, medical devices, food, food supplements, food packaging, and pesticides.

3. Information on the relative importance of different sources, routes,


### 31428 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 106 / Thursday, June 3, 2010 / Notices

and pathways of exposure to phthalates in the general population, expectant mothers, and children. For example,
what are the relative contributions of exposure from diet, consumer products, ambient air, and other sources, which may differ depending on the particular phthalate and the exposed population?

4. Data on consumer use patterns including the use of cosmetics and consumer products that may contain phthalates.

5. Data on children’s activity patterns, including mouthing activity, exposure to household dust, dermal exposure to toys, and other potential child-specific exposure pathways.

6. Information relating to human exposure to phthalates and phthalate substitutes, including migration data, levels in environmental media (ambient and indoor air, water, soil, household dust), dermal exposure, oral exposure, and bioavailability.

7. New, unpublished, or soon-to-be published data on the types and levels of phthalates, phthalate substitutes, or their metabolites in human urine, blood, milk, or other biological media.

8. Information relating to metabolism or pharmacokinetic modeling that could be used to estimate human exposure from biomonitoring studies.

9. Toxicity data on the full range of phthalates and phthalate substitutes in commercial use, especially unpublished or soon-to-be-published studies.

10. Human data on the toxicity of phthalates, including epidemiological and clinical studies, especially unpublished or soon-to-be published
studies.

11. Information on the relative sensitivity of potentially vulnerable populations, including the fetus, young children, and expectant mothers, and whether there are any other vulnerable populations that should be considered.

12. Information relating to assessing the cumulative (combined) risk from multiple phthalates, including dose response data, methodology, which health endpoint (or endpoints) is the most relevant to human risk assessment, and which phthalate substitutes or other compounds may contribute to the
combined risk.

Any information submitted to CPSC in response to this request will become part of the public record. The CHAP is especially interested in unpublished studies relating to toxicity or exposure. However, the CHAP will not consider summaries of toxicological studies prepared by chemical manufacturers as substitutes for the complete studies.

There will be an opportunity for oral comments on July 26, 2010, from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Persons wishing to present oral comments should file a request with the Commission’s Office of the Secretary no later than July 1, 2010,
and submit the text of their comments not later than July 12, 2010.
Commenters should limit their presentations to approximately 15 minutes, exclusive of any periods of questioning by the members of the CHAP or the CPSC staff. The CHAP may further limit the time for any presentation and to impose restrictions to avoid excessive duplication of presentations. Interested persons may
also file written comments with the
CHAP. Written comments must be filed with the Office of the Secretary no later than July 12, 2010. The remainder of the CHAP meeting will be from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on July 27 and from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. on July 28, 2010. During this part of the meeting, the CHAP will discuss issues and the report it will write.

Dated: May 28, 2010
Alberta E. Mills, Acting Secretary, Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010–13389 Filed 6–2–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6355–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION**

**Notice of Proposed Information Collection Requests** 

**AGENCY :**  Department of Education.

**SUMMARY :**  The Acting Director,
Information Collection Clearance Division, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, invites comments on the proposed information collection requests as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.

**DATES :**  Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before August 2,

2010.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) provide interested Federal agencies and the public an early opportunity to comment on information collection requests. OMB may amend or waive the requirement for public consultation to the extent that public participation in the approval process would defeat the purpose of the information collection, violate State or Federal law, or substantially interfere with any agency’s ability to perform its statutory obligations. The Acting Director, Information Collection Clearance Division, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, publishes that notice containing proposed information collection requests prior to submission of these requests to OMB. Each proposed information collection, grouped by office, contains the following: (1) Type of review requested,

e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4) Description of the need for, and proposed use of, the information; (5) Respondents and frequency of collection; and (6) Reporting and/or Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites public comment.

The Department of Education is especially interested in public comment addressing the following issues: (1) Is this collection necessary to the proper functions of the Department; (2) will this information be processed and used in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate of burden accurate; (4) how might the Department enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (5) how might the Department minimize the burden of this collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology.

Dated: May 28, 2010. Sheila Carey, Acting Director, Information Collection Clearance Division, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management.

Office of Postsecondary Education

Type of Review: Revision.
Title: FIPSE Performance Reports. Frequency: Annually. Affected Public: Not-for-profit

institutions.

Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
Burden:

Responses: 901. Burden Hours: 10,426. Abstract: This collection includes an annual and a final performance report for use with all of the following FIPSE programs: Comprehensive (84.116B), EU–U.S. (84.116J), U.S.-Brazil (84.116M), North America (84.116N), and U.S.-Russia (84.116S) Programs.
Also included is an annual and a finalperformance report for CongressionallyDirected grants (earmarks) (84.116Z). A total of five (5) forms comprise this
collection. We need to collect this data
in order to evaluate and assess each grantee for continued funding and assessment of their project.

Requests for copies of the proposed information collection request may be
accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the ‘‘ Browse Pending
Collections ’’ link and by clicking on link number 4304. When you access the information collection, click on

‘‘Download Attachments ’’ to view.