Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 3, 2010 / Proposed Rules 67637 

Protection of Shipments of Irradiated 

Reactor Fuel.’’ The document provides 

guidance on implementing the 

provisions of proposed 10 CFR 73.37, 

‘‘Requirements for Physical Protection of 

Byproduct Material’’ and proposed 10 

CFR 73.38, ‘‘Personnel Access 

Authorization Requirements for 

Irradiated Reactor Fuel in Transit.’’ 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day 

of October 2010. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Robert K. Caldwell, 

Chief, Fuel Cycle and Transportation Security 

Branch, Division of Security Policy, Office 

of Nuclear Security and Incident Response. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27825 Filed 11–2–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

10 CFR Part 431 

[Docket No. EERE–2010–BT–STD–0027] 

RIN 1904–AC28 

Energy Conservation Program for 

Certain Commercial and Industrial 

Equipment: Framework Document for 

Commercial and Industrial Electric 

Motors 

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and 

Renewable Energy, Department of 

Energy. 

ACTION: Notice of extension of comment 

period. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces an 

extension of the time period for 

submitting written comments on the 

framework document for certain 

commercial and industrial electric 

motors. The comment period is 

extended to November 24, 2010. 

DATES: The comment period for the 

framework document for certain 

commercial and industrial electric 

motors, referenced in the notice of 

public meeting and availability 

published on September 28, 2010 (75 FR 

59657), is extended to November 24, 

2010. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

encouraged to submit comments using 

the Federal eRulemaking Portal at 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Alternatively, interested persons may 

submit comments, identified by docket 

number EERE–2010–BT–STD–0027, by 

any of the following methods: 

• E-mail: ElecMotors-2010-STD0027@ee.doe.gov. Include docket 

number EERE–2010–BT–STD–0027 in 

the subject line of the message. 

• Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. 

Department of Energy, Building 

Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J, 

Framework Document for Electric 

Motors, EERE–2010–STD–0027, 1000 

Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20585–0121. Phone: 

(202) 586–2945. Please submit one 

signed paper original. 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda 

Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, 

Building Technologies Program, 6th 

Floor, 950 L’Enfant Plaza, SW., 

Washington, DC 20024. Phone: (202) 

586–2945. Please submit one signed 

paper original. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name and 

docket number or RIN for this 

rulemaking. Note that all comments 

received will be posted without change, 

including any personal information 

provided. 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

read background documents, or 

comments received, go to the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

James Raba, 202–586–8654, e-mail: 

Jim.Raba@ee.doe.gov, Ms. Ami GraceTardy, 202–586–5709, e-mail: 

Ami.Grace-Tardy@hq.doe.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 

published a document in the Federal 

Register on September 28, 2010, 

concerning a public meeting and 

availability of a framework document 

initiating the rulemaking process to 

amend the energy conservation 

standards for certain commercial and 

industrial electric motors. DOE seeks 

comment from interested parties on the 

procedural and analytical approaches it 

anticipates using to evaluate energy 

conservation standards for commercial 

and industrial electric motors, which 

are addressed in the framework 

document, available at http:// 

www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ 

appliance_standards/commercial/ 

electric_motors.html. The framework 

document is the starting point for 

potentially amending the energy 

conservation standards for electric 

motors prescribed in the Energy Policy 

and Conservation Act of 1975, as 

amended, (EPCA) and codified in Title 

10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 

Part 431. The notice of public meeting 

and availability of the framework 

document published on September 28, 

2010 (75 FR 59657) informed interested 

parties that DOE would accept written 

comments on the framework document 

no later than October 28, 2010. 

The National Electrical Manufacturers 

Association (NEMA), American Council 

for an Energy-Efficient Economy 

(ACEEE), and the Appliance Standards 

Awareness Project (ASAP) requested a 

comment deadline extension of two 

weeks after the transcript of the October 

18, 2010, framework document public 

meeting is posted on-line and available 

for public review. 

Based on the joint request from 

NEMA, ACEEE, and ASAP, DOE 

believes that extending the comment 

period to allow additional time for 

interested parties to submit comments is 

appropriate. Therefore, DOE is 

extending the comment period until 

November 24, 2010, to provide 

interested parties additional time to 

prepare and submit comments. DOE 

will accept comments received no later 

than November 24, 2010 and will not 

consider any further extensions to the 

comment period. If DOE receives any 

comments after October 28, 2010, but 

before the date of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register, DOE will 

consider those comments to be timely 

filed. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on October 28, 

2010. 

Cathy Zoi, 

Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and 

Renewable Energy. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27741 Filed 11–2–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2010–1042; Directorate 

Identifier 2010–NM–094–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Model 737–700, –700C, –800, 

and –900ER Series Airplanes, Model 

747–400F Series Airplanes, and Model 

767–200 and –300 Series Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

Model 737–700, –700C, –800, and 

–900ER series airplanes, Model 747– 

400F series airplanes, and Model 767– 

200 and –300 series airplanes. This 

proposed AD would require an 

inspection for affected serial numbers of 

the crew oxygen mask stowage box 

units; and replacement of the crew 

oxygen mask stowage box unit with a 

new crew oxygen mask stowage unit, if 

necessary. This proposed AD results 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
67638 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 3, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

from reports indicating that certain crew 

oxygen mask stowage box units were 

possibly delivered with a burr in the 

inlet fitting. The burr may break loose 

during test or operation and may pose 

an ignition source or cause an inlet 

valve to jam. We are proposing this AD 

to prevent an ignition source, which 

could result in an oxygen-fed fire; or 

could cause an inlet valve to jam in a 

crew oxygen mask stowage box unit, 

which could result in restricted flow of 

oxygen. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by December 20, 

2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, 

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data 

& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, 

MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124– 

2207; telephone 206–544–5000, 

extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; e-mail 

me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet 

https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You 

may review copies of the referenced 

service information at the FAA, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 

Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. 

For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 425–227– 

1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility between 

9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 

docket contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Office 

(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the 

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan L. Monroe, Aerospace Engineer, 

Cabin Safety and Environmental 

Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, 

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office 

(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone 

(425) 917–6457; fax (425) 917–6590. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2010–1042; Directorate Identifier 

2010–NM–094–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD because of those 

comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

We received reports indicating that 

crew oxygen mask stowage box units 

having part number (P/N) MXP147, 

MXP147–2, MXP147–3, MXP147–5, 

MXP402, and MXP410–1, that were 

manufactured between July 12, 2007, 

and November 20, 2007, were possibly 

delivered with a burr in the inlet fitting. 

If not corrected, the burr may break 

loose during test or operation and may 

pose an ignition source, which could 

result in an oxygen-fed fire; or could 

cause an inlet valve to jam in an oxygen 

mask stowage box unit, which could 

result in restricted flow of oxygen. 

Relevant Service Information 

We have reviewed Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletins 737–35A1121, dated 

December 14, 2009; 747–35A2126, 

dated October 8, 2009; and 767– 

35A0057, dated October 8, 2009. The 

service bulletins describe procedures for 

a general visual inspection for affected 

serial numbers of the crew oxygen mask 

stowage box units, and replacement of 

the affected crew oxygen mask stowage 

box unit with a new crew oxygen mask 

stowage box unit. 

The service information refers to 

Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXP1/ 

4–35–175, dated September 11, 2009, 

for inspecting the serial numbers of the 

crew oxygen mask stowage box units. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of This Proposed AD 

We are proposing this AD because we 

evaluated all relevant information and 

determined the unsafe condition 

described previously is likely to exist or 

develop in other products of these same 

type designs. This proposed AD would 

require accomplishing the actions 

specified in the service information 

described previously. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

would affect 40 airplanes of U.S. 

registry. We also estimate that it would 

take about 1 work-hour per product to 

comply with this proposed AD. The 

average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. 

Based on these figures, we estimate the 

cost of this proposed AD to the U.S. 

operators to be $3,400, or $85 per 

product. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and 

3. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 3, 2010 / Proposed Rules 67639 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

You can find our regulatory 

evaluation and the estimated costs of 

compliance in the AD Docket. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new AD: 

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA– 

2010–1042; Directorate Identifier 2010– 

NM–094–AD. 

Comments Due Date 

(a) We must receive comments by 

December 20, 2010. 

Affected ADs 

(b) None. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to The Boeing 

Company airplanes, certificated in any 

category, as identified in paragraphs (c)(1), 

(c)(2), and (c)(3) of this AD. 

(1) Model 737–700, –700C, –800, –900ER 

series airplanes, as identified in Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin 737–35A1121, dated 

December 14, 2009. 

(2) Model 747–400F series airplanes, as 

identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

747–35A2126, dated October 8, 2009. 

(3) Model 767–200 and –300 series 

airplanes, as identified in Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin 767–35A0057, dated October 

8, 2009. 

Subject 

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 35: Oxygen. 

Unsafe Condition 

(e) This AD results from reports indicating 

that certain crew oxygen mask stowage box 

units were possibly delivered with a burr in 

the inlet fitting. The Federal Aviation 

Administration is issuing this AD to prevent 

an ignition source, which could result in an 

oxygen-fed fire; or could cause an inlet valve 

to jam in an oxygen mask stowage box unit, 

which could result in restricted flow of 

oxygen. 

Compliance 

(f) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Inspection and Corrective Action 

(g) Within 24 months after the effective 

date of this AD: Do a general visual 

inspection to determine if the serial number 

of the crew oxygen mask stowage box units 

is identified in the Appendix of 

Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXP1/4–35– 

175, dated September 11, 2009, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of the applicable Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin listed in Table 1 of this AD. 

A review of airplane maintenance records is 

acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the 

serial number of the crew oxygen mask 

stowage box units can be conclusively 

determined from that review. If any crew 

oxygen mask stowage box unit has a serial 

number identified in the Appendix of 

Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXP1/4–35– 

175, dated September 11, 2009: Before 

further flight, replace the crew oxygen mask 

stowage box unit with a new unit, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of the applicable Boeing alert 

service bulletin listed in Table 1 of this AD. 

TABLE 1—SERVICE INFORMATION

Boeing airplane model Document Date 

737–700, –700C, –800, –900ER series airplanes ................. Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–35A1121 ........................ December 14, 2009. 

747–400F series airplanes ..................................................... Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–35A2126 ........................ October 8, 2009. 

767–200 and –300 series airplanes ...................................... Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–35A0057 ........................ October 8, 2009. 

Parts Installation 

(h) As of the effective date of this AD, no 

person may install a crew oxygen mask 

stowage box unit identified in the Appendix 

of Intertechnique Service Bulletin MXP1/4– 

35–175, dated September 11, 2009, on any 

airplane. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Susan 

L. Monroe, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety 

and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM– 

150S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue, 

SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356; 

telephone (425) 917–6457; fax (425) 917– 

6590. Information may be e-mailed to: 

9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov. 

(2) To request a different method of 

compliance or a different compliance time 

for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 

39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on 

any airplane to which the AMOC applies, 

notify your principal maintenance inspector 

(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), 

as appropriate, or lacking a principal 

inspector, your local Flight Standards District 

Office. The AMOC approval letter must 

specifically reference this AD. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 

26, 2010. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27745 Filed 11–2–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2010–1099; Directorate 

Identifier 2010–CE–054–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Piaggio Aero 

Industries S.p.A Model PIAGGIO P–180 

Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for the 

products listed above. This proposed 

AD results from mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) 

originated by an aviation authority of 

another country to identify and correct 

an unsafe condition on an aviation 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS