alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
January 4, 2016

VIA EMAIL AND FEDEX

Rhea Jones 

Geographic Strategies Group Leader

Air Quality Policy Division 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Scott Mathias

Associate Director

Air Quality Policy Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

RE: Air Dispersion Modeling of Sulfur Dioxide Pollution from Maryland’s 

H.A. Wagner, C.P. Crane and Brandon Shores Coal Plants

Dear Ms. Jones and Mr. Mathias:

I write to provide you with a copy of air dispersion modeling conducted by 

Wingra Engineering, S.C. on behalf of the Sierra Club demonstrating that sulfur dioxide 

(“SO2”) emissions from the H.A. Wagner, C.P. Crane, and Brandon Shores facilities in 

Maryland have caused downwind SO2 ambient air concentrations to exceed the 75 parts 

per billion (or 196.2 micrograms per cubic meter) National Ambient Air Quality Standard

(“NAAQS”). The modeling shows 99th percentile concentrations to be as high as 267.7 

micrograms per cubic meter in the areas impacted by these plants based on actual, 

historical emissions of sulfur dioxide. The Sierra Club therefore urges EPA to 

recommend a designation of nonattainment for the area surrounding these facilities this 

month and, should the Maryland Department of the Environment fail to finalize unitspecific emission limits sufficient to ensure attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS 

in the Baltimore area prior to the deadline for EPA’s final designations in July, the Sierra 

Club urges EPA to promulgate a final nonattainment designation. 

Enclosed, please find the results of the modeling analysis, along with two copies 

of the corresponding modeling input and output files on CD. The modeling analysis was 

provided to the Maryland Department of the Environment via letter dated June 18, 2015, 

a copy of which is also included. We urge EPA to consider this information as it 

undertakes area designations in Maryland for the 2010 revised primary SO2 NAAQS. 

This letter and enclosures are being copied to both EPA Region 3 and the Maryland 
Ms. Rhea Jones & Mr. Scott Mathias

January 4, 2016

Page 2

Department of the Environment. In the meantime, please let me know if I can provide 

any additional information.

Thank you for your attention to and consideration of this matter, and please do not 

hesitate to contact me if you would like to discuss further.

Sincerely,

Josh Berman

Staff Attorney

Sierra Club Env. Law Program

50 F St. NW, 8th Floor

Washington, DC 20001

Tel: (202) 650-6062

Email: Josh.Berman@sierraclub.org

cc (via U.S. mail with enclosures): 

Cristina Fernandez, EPA R3

Diana Esher, EPA R3

Tad Aburn, MDE
Exhibit 99

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jean-Pierre Tirouflet, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Rhodia, asociété
anonymeorganized under French law, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Rhodia on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, to my knowledge:



| |  | By: | /s/JEAN-PIERRE TIROUFLETName: Jean-Pierre Tirouflet
Title:Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
July 25, 2003

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Rhodia and will be retained by Rhodia and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

In
accordance with the interim guidance for Section 906 certification issued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2003 in Release
No. 33-8212, this certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that Rhodia
specifically incorporates it by reference.

---

Exhibit 99

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Pierre Prot, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Rhodia, asociété
anonymeorganized under French law, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Rhodia on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, to my knowledge:



| |  | By: | /s/PIERRE PROTName: Pierre Prot
Title:Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
| |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
July 25, 2003

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Rhodia and will be retained by Rhodia and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

In
accordance with the interim guidance for Section 906 certification issued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2003 in Release
No. 33-8212, this certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that Rhodia
specifically incorporates it by reference.

---

QuickLinks
§ 1450.1 Definitions. ( a ) The term *agency* means the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) or any other agency of the U.S. Government as stated at § 1450.20.
( b ) The term *agency head* means the Director of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.
( c ) The terms *appropriate agency official* or *designee* mean the Director of the Financial Management Staff of FMCS, or such other official as may be named in the future by the Director of FMCS.
( d ) The terms *claim* and *debt* are deemed synonymous and interchangeable. They refer to an amount of money or property which has been determined by an appropriate agency official to be owed to the United States from any person, organization or entity, except another Federal agency.
( e ) A debt is considered *delinquent* if it has not been paid by the date specified in the agency's written notification or applicable contractual agreement, unless other satisfactory payment arrangements have been made by that date, or if at any time thereafter the debtor fails to satisfy obligations under a payment agreement with the agency.
( f ) The term *referral for litigation* means referral to the Department of justice for appropriate legal proceedings.
#### § 1602.46 Applicability of State or local law.

The requirements imposed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in these regulations, subparts L and M of this part, supersede any provisions of State or local law which may conflict with them.

[38 FR 26720, Sept. 25, 1973]
#### § 415.39 Safety at end of launch.

To obtain safety approval, an applicant must demonstrate compliance with § 417.129 of this chapter, for any proposed launch of a launch vehicle with a stage or component that will reach Earth orbit.

[Doc. No. FAA-2000-7953, 71 FR 50531, Aug. 25, 2006]
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Angelina Gailey Individually and as Executrix of Estate of Patrick L. Gailey, Dan Patrick Gailey, and Patrick L. Gailey v. Pasqual Gutierrez

Appellate case number: 01

- 12

- 00490

- CV

Trial court case number: 0904324

Trial court: 61st District Court of Harris County

The appellate record was due in the above

- referenced appeal on January 17, 2013. The

clerk’s record was filed on January 25, 2013. On February 6, 2013, t he Clerk of the Court notified appellant s that the court reporter had informed the Court that appellants had not paid, or made arrangements to pay, the reporter’s fee for preparing the record

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(b). The Clerk further notifi ed appellants that unless, on or before March 8, 2013, they filed proof that they had paid

, or had made arrangements to pay

, the reporter ’s fee for preparing the
record, the Court may consider and decide those issues or points that do not require a reporte r’s

record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c) (stating that, if clerk’s record has been filed, appellate court may consider and decide those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record)

. Appellants did not respond. Accordingly, the Court will consi der and decide those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See id

.

Appellants’ brief must be filed no later than 30 days after the date of this order

.

Appellee’s brief will be due within 30 days after appellants ’ brief has been filed

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/

Jane Bland

X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 15, 2013
# EUR-Lex - 31998D0009 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998D0009

**98/9/EC: Commission Decision of 16 December 1997 amending Decision 97/569/EC on drawing up provisional lists of third country establishments from which the Member States authorise imports of meat products (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 003 , 07/01/1998 P. 0012 - 0013 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 16 December 1997 amending Decision 97/569/EC on drawing up provisional lists of third country establishments from which the Member States authorise imports of meat products (Text with EEA relevance) (98/9/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 95/408/EC of 22 June 1995 on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States are authorised to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs (1), as amended by Decision 97/34/EC (2), and in particular Article 2 (4) thereof,

Whereas provisional lists of establishments in third countries producing meat products have been drawn up by Commission Decision 97/569/EC (3);

Whereas South Africa has sent a list of establishments producing poultry meat products and for which the responsible authorities certify that the establishment is in accordance with the Community rules;

Whereas a provisional list of establishments producing poultry meat products can thus be drawn up for South Africa; whereas Decision 97/569/EC should therefore be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to this Decision is added to the Annex to Decision 97/569/EC.

Article 2

This Decision shall apply from 15 December 1997.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 December 1997.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 243, 11. 10. 1995, p. 17.

(2) OJ L 13, 16. 1. 1997, p. 33.

(3) OJ L 234, 26. 8. 1997, p. 16.

ANNEX

País: SUDÁFRICA / Land: SYDAFRIKA / Land: SÜDAFRIKA / ×þñá: ÍÏÔÉÁ ÁÖÑÉÊÇ / Country: SOUTH AFRICA / Pays: AFRIQUE DU SUD / Paese: SUDAFRICA / Land: ZUID-AFRIKA / País: ÁFRICA DO SUL / Maa: ETELÄ-AFRIKKA / Land: SYDAFRIKA

>TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1714

In re: WELLESLEY K. CLAYTON,

------------------------------

WELLESLEY K. CLAYTON,

Debtor - Appellant,

v.

M&T BANK,

Creditor – Appellee,

and

A. BURTON SHUFORD,

Trustee – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, 

Jr., District Judge. (3:16-cv-00018-RJC; 15-30573)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Wellesley K. Clayton, Appellant Pro Se. Lacey Meredith Moore, 

HUTCHENS LAW FIRM, Charlotte, North Carolina; Allen Burton 

Shuford, Mint Hill, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Wellesley K. Clayton appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for reconsideration of a prior order

dismissing as untimely his appeal from the bankruptcy court. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Clayton v. M&T Bank, Nos. 3:16-cv-00018-RJC; 15-30573

(W.D.N.C. May 24, 2016). We deny Clayton’s motion for 

appointment of counsel and we dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### BARSTON etc v CRAIG etc

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21748.

Decided Dec. 4, 1929

Syllabus by

MATTHIAS, J.

TRIAL

(590 Cg) Section 11447, GC, confers upon parties in civil actions the right to have instructions presented in writing, given to the jury before argument, upon request, if same be a correct statement of the law and pertinent to one or more issues in the case. A genial of such right constitutes prejudicial, error.

NEGLIGENCE

(370 C) The doctrine of comparative negligence has application in this state only in actions by an employe ag.ainst his employer.

AUTOMOBILES

(50 Nc) In the trial of an action to recover .damages for negligence in the operation of a motor vehicle, evidence of negligence on the part of plaintiff having been adduced, it was not error to give to the jury the following requested instruction before argument: “if you find from the evidence th"t the plaintiff’s own negligence directly paused or contributed in the' slightest degree to cause the injuries complained of, then your verdict must be for the defendant.”.

Kinkade, Robinson, Jones, and Day, JJ., concur.
§ 95.15 Western United States Mountainous Area. All of the following area excluding that portion specified in the exceptions: ( a ) *Area.* From the Pacific coastline of the United States, eastward along the Canadian and Mexican borders, to the following coordinates: Beginning at latitude 49°00′ N., longitude 108°00′ W.; thence to latitude 46°45′ N., longitude 104°00′ W.; thence to latitude 44°06′ N., longitude 103°15′ W.; thence to latitude 43°00′ N., longitude 103°15′ W.; thence to latitude 41°52′ N., longitude 103°39′ W.; thence to latitude 35°11′ N., longitude 103°39′ W.; thence to latitude 33°17′ N., longitude 104°27′ W.; thence to latitude 32°17′ N., longitude 104°14′ W.; thence to latitude 29°48′ N., longitude 102°00′ W.
( b ) *Exceptions.*
(1) Beginning at latitude 35°25′ N., longitude 119°09′ W.; thence to latitude 35°29′ N., longitude 118°58′ W.; thence to latitude 36°49′ N., longitude 119°37′ W.; thence to latitude 38°30′ N., longitude 121°24′ W.; thence to latitude 39°30′ N., longitude 121°32′ W.; thence to latitude 40°08′ N., longitude 122°08′ W.; thence to latitude 40°06′ N., longitude 122°20′ W.; thence to latitude 39°05′ N., longitude 122°12′ W.; thence to latitude 38°01′ N., longitude 121°51′ W.; thence to latitude 37°37′ N., longitude 121°12′ W.; thence to latitude 37°00′ N., longitude 120°58′ W.; thence to latitude 36°14′ N., longitude 120°11′ W., point of beginning. (2) Beginning at latitude 49°00′ N., longitude 122°21′ W.; thence to latitude 48°34′ N., longitude 122°21′ W.; thence to latitude 48°08′ N., longitude 122°00′ W.; thence to latitude 47°12′ N., longitude 122°00′ W.; thence to latitude 46°59′ N., longitude 122°13′ W.; thence to latitude 46°52′ N., longitude 122°16′ W.; thence to latitude 46°50′ N., longitude 122°40′ W.; thence to latitude 46°35′ N., longitude 122°48′ W.; thence to latitude 46°35′ N., longitude 123°17′ W.; thence to latitude 47°15′ N., longitude 123°17′ W.; thence to latitude 47°41′ N., longitude 122°54′ W.; thence to latitude 48°03′ N., longitude 122°48′ W.; thence to latitude 48°17′ N., longitude 123°15′ W.; thence North and East along the United States and Canada Boundary to latitude 49°00′ N., longitude 122°21′ W., point of beginning.
[21 FR 2750, Apr. 28, 1956. Redesignated by Amdt. 1-1, 28 FR 6718, June 29, 1963, and amended by Amdt. 95-255, 40 FR 2579, Jan. 14, 1975]
#### § 1202.13 Air carriers.

By the terms of title II of the Railway Labor Act, which was approved April 10, 1936, all of title I, except section 3, which relates to the National Railroad Adjustment Board, was extended to cover every common carrier by air engaged in interstate or foreign commerce, and every carrier by air transporting mail for or under contract with the United States Government, and to all employees or subordinate officials of such air carriers.
#### § 1602.34 Commission's remedy for political jurisdiction's failure to file report.

Any political jurisdiction failing or refusing to file report EEO-4 when required to do so may be compelled to file by order of a U.S. district court, upon application of the Attorney General.
Exhibit 10.12

February 7,
1994

Mr. David
Montgomery
 Cleveland

Dear
David:

It
is with pleasure that I confirm your appointment as our new Vice PresidentFinance and Chief Financial Officer for all financial affairs for Advanstar.

As
discussed, your new salary will be $120,000 per year and your bonus incentive is $45,000. You will receive an additional week of vacation which will total 4 weeks per annum. Your
salary will be retroactive to February 1, 1994.

If
at any time in the future you are involuntarily separated from the Company for reasons other than cause, you will be entitled to a termination payment equal to six month's salary.

David,
I look forward to working with you and developing a strong duo to go forward in making Advanstar Financial Services a more positive and proactive part of our Company. I have a
great amount of confidence in your abilities and look forward to your expanding capabilities at our Company.

Sincerely,

/s/EDWARD D. ASTER

Edward
D. Aster

---
À“×Ã¤‹ ÕÃflÃ¤Õ ›—ÀŒÃ —⁄ fl––¤fl‘Õ

⁄—Œ Ãÿ¤ “×“Ãÿ ›×Œ›À×Ã

À“×Ã¤‹ ÕÃflÃ¤Õ —⁄ fl”¤Œ×›flÙ

 –¥ø·2 ̈·ooÛfl°°a¥¥ø2 ̈Ù

TMÚ

...×‘‘×fl” fl“›¤ ÃÀŒ“¤ŒÙ

 ‹aoa2oø2 ̈Ûfl°°a¥¥aaÚ

“±Ú ðÁÛÎðÎËÏ

‹Ú›Ú “±Ú ÓÊðÈÛ1⁄2ÆÛððÍðÏÛ”””

›a2 ̈Æø¥ ‹·­ ̈Æ·1⁄2 ̈ ±o ›ø¥·o±Æ2·øÙ

‘±­ fl21a¥a­

—Œ‹¤Œ

fiao±ÆaÊ ‘¤fl «Ù ÿfl...’×“ÕÙ ø2o Ãÿ—”flÕÙ ›·Æ1⁄2 ́· ̈ ÷ ́o1a­Ú

Ã ̧a 3a3±Æø2o ́3 o·­°±­· ̈·±2 o·¥ao Õa° ̈a3æaÆ ÈÙ ÓðÔð ·­ ©· ̈ ̧oÆø©2Ú fl 2a©

3a3±Æø2o ́3 o·­°±­· ̈·±2 ©·¥¥ æa o·¥ao 1⁄2±21⁄2 ́ÆÆa2 ̈¥ß ©· ̈ ̧  ̈ ̧·­ ±ÆoaÆÚ 

Ã ̧a °ø2a¥  ̧ø­ TM± ̈ao  ̈± oa2ß  ̈ ̧a °a ̈· ̈·±2 o±Æ °ø2a¥ Æa ̧aøÆ·21Ú

Ã ̧a o ́¥¥ 1⁄2± ́Æ ̈  ̧ø­ æaa2 øoTM·­ao ±o  ̈ ̧a °a ̈· ̈·±2 o±Æ Æa ̧aøÆ·21 a2 æø21⁄2 ø2o 2±

¶ ́o1a  ̧ø­ ÆaØ ́a­ ̈ao ø TM± ̈a ±2 © ̧a ̈ ̧aÆ  ̈± Æa ̧aøÆ  ̈ ̧a 3ø ̈ ̈aÆ a2 æø21⁄2Ú Õaa ⁄aoÚ ŒÚ

fl°°Ú –Ú ÌÎÚ

Ã ́Æ2aÆé­ °a ̈· ̈·±2 o±Æ °ø2a¥ Æa ̧aøÆ·21 ø2o °a ̈· ̈·±2 o±Æ Æa ̧aøÆ·21 a2 æø21⁄2 øÆa

oa2·aoÚ 

“± o ́Æ ̈ ̧aÆ o·¥·21­ ©·¥¥ æa ø1⁄21⁄2a° ̈ao ·2  ̈ ̧·­ 1⁄2¥±­ao 1⁄2ø­aÚ

⁄×‘¤‹

fl–Œ ÔÁ ÓðÔÔ

”—‘‘« ›Ú ‹...«¤ŒÙ ›‘¤Œ’

ÀÚÕÚ ›—ÀŒÃ —⁄ fl––¤fl‘Õ
Ã ̧·­ o·­°±­· ̈·±2 ·­ 2± ̈ ø°°Æ±°Æ·ø ̈a o±Æ ° ́æ¥·1⁄2ø ̈·±2 ø2o ·­ 2± ̈ °Æa1⁄2aoa2 ̈ ˆ

a®1⁄2a° ̈ ø­ °Æ±TM·oao æß Á ̈ ̧ ›·ÆÚ ŒÚ ÌÍÛÌÚ

Ã ̧a °ø2a¥  ́2ø2·3± ́­¥ß 1⁄2±21⁄2¥ ́oa­  ̈ ̧·­ 1⁄2ø­a ·­ ­ ́· ̈øæ¥a o±Æ oa1⁄2·­·±2 ˆˆ

©· ̈ ̧± ́ ̈ ±Æø¥ øÆ1 ́3a2 ̈Ú Õaa ⁄aoÚ ŒÚ fl°°Ú –Ú ÌÏ ̄ø ̃ ̄Ó ̃Ú

“—Ã ⁄—Œ –Àfi‘×›flÃ×—“

À“×Ã¤‹ ÕÃflÃ¤Õ ›—ÀŒÃ —⁄ fl––¤fl‘Õ

⁄—Œ Ãÿ¤ “×“Ãÿ ›×Œ›À×Ã

À“×Ã¤‹ ÕÃflÃ¤Õ —⁄ fl”¤Œ×›flÙ

 –¥ø·2 ̈·oo Û fl°°a¥¥aaÙ

TMÚ

...×‘‘×fl” fl“›¤ ÃÀŒ“¤ŒÙ

 ‹aoa2oø2 ̈ Û fl°°a¥¥ø2 ̈Ú

“±Ú ðÁÛÎðÎËÏ

‹Ú›Ú “±Ú ÓÊðÈÛ1⁄2ÆÛððÍðÏÛ”””

”¤”—Œfl“‹À”ˆ

fl°°aø¥ oÆ±3  ̈ ̧a À2· ̈ao Õ ̈ø ̈a­ ‹·­ ̈Æ·1⁄2 ̈ ›± ́Æ ̈

o±Æ  ̈ ̧a ›a2 ̈Æø¥ ‹·­ ̈Æ·1⁄2 ̈ ±o ›ø¥·o±Æ2·ø

”øÆ1øÆa ̈ ”Ú ”±ÆÆ±©Ù ‹·­ ̈Æ·1⁄2 ̈ ÷ ́o1aÙ –Æa­·o·21

Õ ́æ3· ̈ ̈ao fl ́1 ́­ ̈ ÓÌÙ ÓðÔðˆˆ 

fiao±ÆaÊ ‘¤fl «Ù ÿfl...’×“ÕÙ ø2o Ãÿ—”flÕÙ ›·Æ1⁄2 ́· ̈ ÷ ́o1a­Ú

...·¥¥·ø3 ø21⁄2a Ã ́Æ2aÆ ø°°aø¥­ oÆ±3  ̧·­ 1 ́·¥ ̈ßÛ°¥aø 1⁄2±2TM·1⁄2 ̈·±2 ø2o ÔÁÓÛ

3±2 ̈ ̧ ­a2 ̈a21⁄2a o±Æ æø2μ Æ±ææaÆßÙ ·2 TM·±¥ø ̈·±2 ±o ÔË ÀÚÕÚ›Ú y ÓÔÔÌ ̄ø ̃Ú ...a  ̧øTMa

¶ ́Æ·­o·1⁄2 ̈·±2  ́2oaÆ ÓË ÀÚÕÚ›Ú y ÔÓÁÔÙ ø2o ©a øoo·Æ3Ú 

⁄×‘¤‹

fl–Œ ÔÁ ÓðÔÔ

”—‘‘« ›Ú ‹...«¤ŒÙ ›‘¤Œ’

ÀÚÕÚ ›—ÀŒÃ —⁄ fl––¤fl‘Õ
Ó ðÁÛÎðÎËÏ

Ã ́Æ2aÆ 1⁄2±2 ̈a2o­  ̈ ̧ø ̈  ̧·­ 1 ́·¥ ̈ß °¥aø ©ø­ 2± ̈ μ2±©·21 ø2o TM±¥ ́2 ̈øÆß æa1⁄2ø ́­a

 ̈ ̧a o·­ ̈Æ·1⁄2 ̈ 1⁄2± ́Æ ̈ ¥ao  ̧·3  ̈± æa¥·aTMa aÆÆ±2a± ́­¥ß  ̈ ̧ø ̈  ̧a 1⁄2± ́¥o ø°°aø¥  ̈ ̧a 1⁄2± ́Æ ̈éÆ ́¥·21­ ±2 °ÆaÛ°¥aø 3± ̈·±2­Ú Ã ̧·­ 1⁄2±2 ̈a2 ̈·±2 ·­ 2± ̈ ­ ́°°±Æ ̈ao æß  ̈ ̧a Æa1⁄2±ÆoÚ

Ã ́Æ2aÆ o ́Æ ̈ ̧aÆ 1⁄2±2 ̈a2o­  ̈ ̧ø ̈  ̈ ̧a o·­ ̈Æ·1⁄2 ̈ 1⁄2± ́Æ ̈ °Æ±1⁄2ao ́Æø¥¥ß aÆÆao ø ̈

­a2 ̈a21⁄2·21 æß oø·¥·21  ̈± ø°°Æa1⁄2·ø ̈a  ̈ ̧a ­·12·o·1⁄2ø21⁄2a ±o øæ ́­a  ̧a ­ ́ooaÆao © ̧·¥a ·2

°Æ·­±2 ø2o æß oø·¥·21  ̈± øooÆa­­  ̧·­ ­ ́­1⁄2a° ̈·æ·¥· ̈ß  ̈± o ́ ̈ ́Æa øæ ́­aÚ Ã ̧a Æa1⁄2±Æo

Æao¥a1⁄2 ̈­  ̈ ̧ø ̈  ̈ ̧a o·­ ̈Æ·1⁄2 ̈ 1⁄2± ́Æ ̈ o·o 2± ̈ °Æ±1⁄2ao ́Æø¥¥ß aÆÆÚ Õaa À2· ̈ao Õ ̈ø ̈a­ TMÚ ›øÆ ̈ßÙ

ÎÓð ⁄ÚÌo ÁËÏÙ ÁÁÔÛÁÌ  ̄Á ̈ ̧ ›·ÆÚ ÓððË ̃  ̄a2 æø21⁄2 ̃Ú 

⁄·2ø¥¥ßÙ 1⁄2±2 ̈ÆøÆß  ̈± Ã ́Æ2aÆé­ 1⁄2±2 ̈a2 ̈·±2Ù  ̈ ̧a ­a2 ̈a21⁄2a ·3°±­ao ·­

­ ́æ­ ̈ø2 ̈·TMa¥ß Æaø­±2øæ¥a  ́2oaÆ  ̈ ̧a  ̈± ̈ø¥· ̈ß ±o  ̈ ̧a 1⁄2·Æ1⁄2 ́3­ ̈ø21⁄2a­Ú Õaa ·oÚ ø ̈ ÁÁÌÚ 

fl⁄⁄×Œ”¤‹Ú
Appendix H 

M&NE Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines 


































































































APPENDIX A to

Maritimes and Northeast Pipeline 

Phase IV Maine Facilities 

Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines 

FERC Wetland and Waterbody Construction and 

Mitigation Procedures 

1/17/2003 Version

 May be found at http://www.ferc.gov/industries/gas/enviro/wetland.pdf
Appendix B 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Upland Erosion 

Control, Revegetation, and Maintenance Plan 

(1/17/2003 Version) 
APPENDIX B to

Maritimes and Northeast Pipeline 

Phase IV Maine Facilities 

Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines 

FERC Upland Erosion Control, Revegetation, and 

 Maintenance Plan 

1/17/2003 Version

 May be found at http://www.ferc.gov/industries/gas/enviro/uplndctl.pdf
#### DAYTON (city) v JACOBS

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21261.

Decided Feb 6, 1929

Syllabus by

ROBINSON, J.

MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS

(360 P5) It is within the police power of a municipality, under Section 3 of Article XVIII of the Constitution of Ohio, for the preservation of the public health, to prohibit the sale or exposure for sale -of diseased and unwholesome meat within its territory, and, for the accomplishment of such purpose, to provide that, before any meat be sold or offered for sale, it be first inspected and approved by a duly constituted officer of the municipality, according to a standard established by such municipality, or by some other constituted authority having as high a standard of inspection and approval.

A municipality has the power to charge and collect a fee for such inspection service, commensurate with the cost of such service, from the person so selling or offering for sale meat intended for human consumption.

STATUTES

(550 F) The fact that certain slaughtering establishments in a municipality, by reason of the scope of their business, are entitled to receive and do receive a free inspection service and an approval or disapproval from the federal government and therefore do not require nor receive such service from the municipality, and are not charged any inspection fee by the municipality, does not make the exaction by the municipality of a fee for inspection service from establishments which are not entitled to and do not receive inspection service from the federal government and do require and • receive inspection service from the municipality, invalid because of discrimination.

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

(140 O) Sections 735 and 737 of the meat inspection ordinance of the city of Dayton, as amended December 28, 1927, are valid and enforceable provisions.

Marshall, CJ, Kinkade, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ, concur.