alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1471.330 What requirements must I pass down to persons at lower tiers with whom I intend to do business? Before entering into a covered transaction with a participant at the next lower tier, you must require that participant to— ( a ) Comply with this subpart as a condition of participation in the transaction. You may do so using any method(s), unless § 1471.440 requires you to use specific methods.
( b ) Pass the requirement to comply with this subpart to each person with whom the participant enters into a covered transaction at the next lower tier.
JAMES WILLIAM FOWLER

, Appellant,

v.

KRISTY L. FOWLER

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 0843

___ __________________________/

Opinion filed May 15, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. James P. Nilon , Judge

. James William Fowler, pro se

, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration o f the appellant's response to the Court's order of April

14, 2015, the Court has determined that the Partial Final Judgment of Dissolution

of Marriage is not a final order as it reserves jurisdiction to expend additional

judicial labor over the non

- collate ral issues of child support and parental2 responsibility. See Hoffman v. O’Connor , 802 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002);

Klein v. Klein , 551 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Accordingly, the appeal is

hereby dismissed as premature.

WOLF, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999             JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000             JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                             483                     483
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  742,263                 742,263
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (36,038)                (36,038)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               706,708                 706,708
<PP&E>                                          70,576                  70,576
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,320                  12,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,218,786               1,218,786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          294,551                 294,551
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     3,250,650               3,250,650
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,599,413)             (2,599,413)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,218,786               1,218,786
<SALES>                                        798,340                 306,316
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               798,340                 306,316
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,441,428                 685,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,709                   1,538
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (643,088)               (378,928)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (643,088)               (378,928)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)                   (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)                   (.02)


</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4610 

To require face masks in Federal facilities to prevent the transmission of 

SARS–CoV–2, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2020 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself, Mr. CARPER, Mr. BROWN, and Ms. HIRONO) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require face masks in Federal facilities to prevent the 

transmission of SARS–CoV–2, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wear Your Mask Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. MASKS REQUIRED IN FEDERAL FACILITIES. 

6 (a) MASKS REQUIRED.—Each Federal agency shall 

7 take action to ensure that an individual is required to wear 

8 a face mask if such individual is— 

9 (1) inside a Federal facility under the jurisdic10 tion of such agency; and 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4610 IS

1 (2) within 6 feet of another individual. 

2 (b) ENFORCEMENT.—A Federal agency may remove 

3 or deny service to an individual who fails to wear a mask 

4 in accordance with subsection (a). 

5 (c) PROVISION OF MASKS.—Each Federal agency 

6 shall make face masks available at each entrance to a Fed7 eral facility at which such agency maintains a presence. 

8 (d) FUNDING.—A Federal agency shall use funds 

9 otherwise appropriated to such agency to carry out this 

10 section. 

11 (e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi12 nitions apply: 

13 (1) CAPITOL BUILDINGS.—The term ‘‘Capitol 

14 Buildings’’ has the meaning given such term in sec15 tion 5101 of title 40, United States Code. 

16 (2) FACE MASK.—The term ‘‘face mask’’ means 

17 a mask covering both the nose and mouth, or other 

18 protective face covering, that reasonably can be ex19 pected to minimize the transmission of SARS–CoV– 

20 2. 

21 (3) FEDERAL AGENCY.—The term ‘‘Federal 

22 agency’’ has the meaning given such term in section 

23 102 of title 40, United States Code, except that with 

24 respect to Capitol Buildings the Office of the ArchiVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:10 Sep 25, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4610.IS S4610

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4610 IS

1 tect of the Capitol shall be treated as the relevant 

2 Federal agency. 

3 (4) FEDERAL FACILITY.—The term ‘‘Federal 

4 facility’’ means— 

5 (A) a building or any part thereof owned 

6 or leased by the Federal Government for use by 

7 a Federal agency; and 

8 (B) the Capitol Buildings or any part 

9 thereof. 

10 (f) TERMINATION.—The requirements of this section 

11 shall cease to have effect on the date on which the Director 

12 of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Dis13 eases determines, and publishes in the Federal Register 

14 a notification of such determination, that the requirement 

15 to wear a mask is no longer necessary to prevent trans16 mission of SARS–CoV–2. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Gary D. Woerz,
CFO of American International Industries, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

I, Gary D. Woerz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form
10-QSB of American International Industries, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, 
I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the undersigned by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as
of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report management's conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors:

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.  I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 22, 2006, 
Gary D. Woerz
Chief Financial Officer/s/ Gary D. Woerz
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

FVP OPPORTUNITY FUND III, LP , FVP INVESTMENTS LLC , and
FVP SERVICING, LLC, Appellant s ,

v.

KENNETH J. GOODMAN, as trustee of the DCG 2008 IRREVOCABLE WEALTH TRUST , and INTERFACE PROPERTIES, LLC , Appellee s

.

No. 4D2023

- 3057

[ May 23, 2024 ]

Appeal of nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Jack B

. Tuter, Jr. , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE22

- 005125

.

Jerrell A. Breslin and Jonathan Noah Schwartz of Schwartz | Breslin,
PLLC , Miami, and Bradford Cohen and Michael James McMullen of Cohen & McMullen, P.A

. , Fort Lauderdale

, for appellant s

.

Ivan Jac Reich and Terry Resk of Nason, Yeager, Gerson, Harris & Fumero, P.A. , Palm Beach Gardens

, for appellee s

.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

M AY , L EVINE and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 60.4 Qualification Performance Standards. The Qualification Performance Standards (QPS) are published in appendices to this part as follows: ( a ) Appendix A contains the QPS for Airplane Flight Simulators.
( b ) Appendix B contains the QPS for Airplane Flight Training Devices.
( c ) Appendix C contains the QPS for Helicopter Flight Simulators.
( d ) Appendix D contains the QPS for Helicopter Flight Training Devices.
( e ) Appendix E contains the QPS for Quality Management Systems for FSTDs.
( f ) Appendix F contains the QPS for Definitions and Abbreviations for FSTDs.
§ 1471.415 What must I do if a Federal agency excludes the participant or a principal after I enter into a covered transaction? ( a ) You as an agency official may continue covered transactions with an excluded person, or under which an excluded person is a principal, if the transactions were in existence when the person was excluded. You are not required to continue the transactions, however, and you may consider termination. You should make a decision about whether to terminate and the type of termination action, if any, only after a thorough review to ensure that the action is proper.
( b ) You may not renew or extend covered transactions (other than no-cost time extensions) with any excluded person, or under which an excluded person is a principal, unless you obtain an exception under § 1471.120.
§ 1603.204 Ex parte communications. ( a ) Oral or written communications concerning the merits of an adjudication between the administrative law judge or decision-making personnel of the Commission and an interested party to the adjudication without providing the other party a chance to participate are prohibited from the time the matter is assigned to an administrative law judge until the Commission has rendered a final decision. Communications between the administrative law judge or Commission personnel and one party concerning the status of the case, the date of a hearing, the method of transmitting evidence to the Commission, and other purely procedural questions are permitted.
( b ) “Decision-making personnel of the Commission” includes members of the Commission and their staffs as well as personnel in the Office of Federal Operations but does not include investigators and intake staff.
( c ) Any communication made in violation of this section shall be made part of the record and an opportunity for rebuttal by the other party allowed. If the communication was oral, a memorandum stating the substance of the discussion shall be placed in the record.
( d ) Where it appears that a party has engaged in prohibited ex parte communications, that party may be required to show cause why, in the interest of justice, the party's claim or defense should not be dismissed, denied, or otherwise adversely affected.
[62 FR 17543, Apr. 10, 1997, as amended at 89 FR 47852, June 4, 2024]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      15,073,624
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,073,624
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,073,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,690,803
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,073,624
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:**N**ationalElk Refuge: .... elk hunting information and regulations
 
2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015| 2016 | 2017| 2018
2020
 
SuDoc Number:I 49.6: EL 5/
Item Number:0612-E-01 (online)
CGP System Number:000929841
 
October 3, 2017
 
 **
§ 1608.11 Limitations on the application of these guidelines. ( a ) *No determination of adequacy of plan or program.* These Guidelines are applicable only with respect to the circumstances described in § 1608.1(d), of this part. They do not apply to, and the section 713(b)(1) defense is not available for the purpose of, determining the adequacy of an affirmative action plan or program to eliminate discrimination. Whether an employer who takes such affirmative action has done enough to remedy such discrimination will remain a question of fact in each case.
( b ) *Guidelines inapplicable in absence of affirmative action.* Where an affirmative action plan or program does not exist, or where the plan or program is not the basis of the action complained of, these Guidelines are inapplicable.
( c ) *Currency of plan or program.* Under section 713(b)(1), persons may rely on the plan or program only during the time when it is current. Currency is related to such factors as progress in correcting the conditions disclosed by the self analysis. The currency of the plan or program is a question of fact to be determined on a case by case basis. Programs developed under Executive Order 11246, as amended, will be deemed current in accordance with Department of Labor regulations at 41 CFR chapter 60, or successor orders or regulations.
#### § 102.83 Petition for referendum under Section 9(e)(1) of the Act; who may file; where to file; withdrawal.

A petition to rescind the authority of a labor organization to make an agreement requiring as a condition of employment membership in such labor organization may be filed by an employee or group of employees on behalf of 30 percent or more of the employees in a bargaining unit covered by such an agreement. The petition shall be in writing and signed, and either must be sworn to before a notary public, Board agent, or other person duly authorized by law to administer oaths and take acknowledgments or must contain a declaration by the person signing it, under the penalties of the Criminal Code, that its contents are true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief. One original of the petition must be filed with the Regional Director wherein the bargaining unit exists or, if the unit exists in two or more Regions, with the Regional Director for any of such Regions. A person filing a petition by facsimile must also file an original for the Agency's records, but failure to do so must not affect the validity of the filing by facsimile, if otherwise proper. A person filing a petition electronically need not file an original. The petition may be withdrawn only with the approval of the Regional Director with whom such petition was filed. Upon approval of the withdrawal of any petition the case will be closed.

[82 FR 11765, Feb. 24, 2017, as amended at 82 FR 43699, Sept. 19, 2017]
###### Editorial Note on Part 302

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 302.2 Definitions.

*Administrative law judge* as used in this part means an administrative law judge appointed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 3105.

*DOT Decisionmaker* as used in this part is the official authorized to issue final decisions of the Department as set forth in § 302.18. This includes the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs, the senior career official in the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs, the Deputy Secretary, and the Secretary.

*Hearing case* or *oral hearing case* means any proceeding that the Department has determined will be conducted on the record using oral evidentiary procedures subject to 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557.

*Non-hearing case* means any proceeding not involving oral evidentiary procedures.

*Party* as used in this part includes the person initiating a proceeding, such as an applicant, complainant, or petitioner; any person filing an answer to such filing; and any other persons as set forth in § 302.10.

[Docket No. OST-97-2090, 65 FR 6457, Feb. 9, 2000, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15936, Apr. 16, 2019]
#### In the Matter of Elizabeth A. Eastman, Appellant, v Department of Citywide Administrative Services et al., Respondents.

[698 NYS2d 456]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered March 31, 1999, which denied petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondents’ determination denying her retirement credit in the New York City Employees’ Retirement System for time worked by her prior to her appointment to a Civil Service title, and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Supreme Court properly found respondents’ determination, that petitioner was not entitled to retirement credit for time worked for a private employer, neither arbitrary and capricious nor irrational. Administrative Code of the City of New York § 13-101 (3) (a) defines “city-service” as “service, whether appointive or elective, as an officer or employee of the city or state of New York * * * so far as such service is paid for by *54the city”. Since petitioner was not an employee of the City prior to her appointment from the open competitive list on February 2, 1998, she is not entitled to retirement system credit for time prior to that date.

The record does not support petitioner’s claim that Supreme Court converted respondents’ CPLR 3211 (a) (7) motion to a motion for summary judgment. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.
§ 1471.885 May the debarring official extend a debarment? ( a ) Yes, the debarring official may extend a debarment for an additional period, if that official determines that an extension is necessary to protect the public interest.
( b ) However, the debarring official may not extend a debarment solely on the basis of the facts and circumstances upon which the initial debarment action was based.
( c ) If the debarring official decides that a debarment for an additional period is necessary, the debarring official must follow the applicable procedures in this subpart, and subpart F of this part, to extend the debarment.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105

- 2498

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

May 7, 2012

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Volvo M eeting with EPA R e garding Proposal for 2017

- 2025 Light

- Duty (LD)

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Standards

FROM: Robin Moran, Senior Policy Advisor

TO: EPA Docket # EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2010

- 0799

This memo documents a meeting held on February 8 , 2012 between representatives of Volvo and

E PA. The meeting attendees included the following:

Volvo : Stefan Jacoby, Anders Karrberg, Katherine Yehl

EPA : Margo Oge, Chet France, Ed Nam , Robin Moran,

Volvo discussed their overall support for the national program and a midterm evaluation, and

th eir views on various flexibilities in the program, including electrification incentives, off

- cycle

credits, and air conditioning credits.