alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 417.224 Probability of failure analysis. ( a ) *General.* All flight safety analyses for a launch, regardless of hazard or phase of flight, must account for launch vehicle failure probability in a consistent manner. A launch vehicle failure probability estimate must use accurate data, scientific principles, and a method that is statistically or probabilistically valid. For a launch vehicle with fewer than two flights, the failure probability estimate must account for the outcome of all previous launches of vehicles developed and launched in similar circumstances. For a launch vehicle with two or more flights, launch vehicle failure probability estimates must account for the outcomes of all previous flights of the vehicle in a statistically valid manner.
( b ) *Failure.* For flight safety analysis purposes, a failure occurs when a launch vehicle does not complete any phase of normal flight or when any anomalous condition exhibits the potential for a stage or its debris to impact the Earth or reenter the atmosphere during the mission or any future mission of similar launch vehicle capability. Also, either a launch incident or launch accident constitutes a failure.
( c ) *Previous flight.* For flight analysis purposes, flight begins at a time in which a launch vehicle normally or inadvertently lifts off from a launch platform. Lift-off occurs with any motion of the launch vehicle with respect to the launch platform.
```

[Federal Register: December 22, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 246)]
[Notices]
[Page 78419]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22de08-147]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6436]


Advisory Committee International Postal and Delivery Services

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice; FACA Committee meeting announcement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law
92-463, the Department of State gives notice of the fourth meeting of
the Advisory Committee on International Postal and Delivery Services.
This Committee has been formed in fulfillment of the provisions of the
2006 Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (Pub. L. 109-435) and in
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
    Public input: Any member of the public interested in providing
public input to the meeting should contact Mr. Chris Wood, whose
contact information is listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this notice. Each individual providing oral input is
requested to limit his or her comments to five minutes. Requests to be
added to the speaker list must be received in writing (letter, e-mail
or fax) prior to the close of business on February 6, 2009; written
comments from members of the public for distribution at this meeting
must reach Mr. Wood by letter, e-mail or fax by this same date.
    Meeting agenda: The agenda of the meeting will include a review of
the results of the October-November 2008 sessions of the UPU Postal
Operations Council and Council of Administration as well as other
subjects related to international postal and delivery services of
interest to Advisory Committee members and the public.

DATES: February 12, 2009 from 2 p.m. to about 5 p.m. (open to the
public).
    Location: The American Institute of Architects (Boardroom), 1735
New York Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20006.
    For further information, please contact Christopher Wood, Office of
Technical Specialized Agencies (IO/T), Bureau of International
Organization Affairs, U.S. Department of State, at (202) 647-1044,
woodcs@state.gov.
    Designated Federal Officer, Advisory Committee on International
Postal and Delivery Services: Dennis M. Delehanty.

    Dated: December 5, 2008.
Dennis M. Delehanty,
Foreign Affairs Officer, Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E8-30375 Filed 12-19-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-19-P
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Mark J. Cresswell, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of NEON Systems, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

(a)          designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and

 

(b)         evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)          disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

 

(a)          all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

(b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| February 17, 2004            |
|------------------------------|
|                         |
| /s/                          | Mark J. Cresswell |   |
|                         |
| Mark J.Cresswell             |
| principal  executive officer |

 

1

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archivedcopies of publications are retrieved in the event that publications are nolonger available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Rockaway Delivery LateralProject, Northeast Connector Project, final environmental impact statement.**
 
SuDoc Number:E 2.11:0246 F
Item Number:0429-V-17 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000927083
 
 
Cover  Letter
Table  of Contents
Executive  Summary
Section  1
Section  2a
Section  2b
Section  3
Section  4a
Section  4b
Section  5
Appendix  A
Appendix  B
Appendix  C
Appendix  D
Appendix  E
Appendix  F
Appendix  G
Appendix  H
Appendix  I
Appendix  J
Appendix  K
Appendix  L
Appendix  M
Appendix  N
Appendix  O
Appendix  P
Appendix  Q
Appendix  R
Appendix  S
 
 
 
January 17, 2018
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4544 

To specify the Federal share of the costs of certain duty of the National 

Guard in connection with the Coronavirus Disease 2019. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2020 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. DURBIN, and Ms. DUCKWORTH) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To specify the Federal share of the costs of certain duty 

of the National Guard in connection with the 

Coronavirus Disease 2019. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FEDERAL SHARE OF COSTS OF CERTAIN DUTY 

4 OF MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL GUARD IN 

5 CONNECTION WITH THE CORONAVIRUS DIS6 EASE 2019. 

7 (a) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the 

8 costs of duty performed by members of the National 

9 Guard under section 502(f) of title 32, United States 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4544 IS

1 Code, for a mission assignment validated by the Federal 

2 Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) pursuant to a 

3 declaration specified in subsection (b) shall be 100 per4 cent. 

5 (b) DECLARATIONS.—A declaration specified in this 

6 subsection is any declaration as follows: 

7 (1) A major disaster declared by the President 

8 under section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 

9 Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

10 5170) with respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 

11 (COVID–19). 

12 (2) An emergency declared by the President 

13 under section 501 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 

14 Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

15 5191) with respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2019. 

16 (3) A national emergency declared by the Presi17 dent under the National Emergencies Act (50 

18 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) with respect to the Coronavirus 

19 Disease 2019. 

20 (4) A public health emergency declared under 

21 section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

22 U.S.C. 247d) with respect to the Coronavirus Dis23 ease 2019. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1120

DAVID LOUIS WHITEHEAD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION;

TYNDALE HOUSE PUBLISHER, INCORPORATED; NEW

MARKET FILMS, INCORPORATED; FOX 43,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:06-cv-01349-CMH)

Submitted: May 11, 2007 Decided: August 17, 2007

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Louis Whitehead, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

David Louis Whitehead appeals the district court’s order

transferring his complaint, alleging copyright infringement, to the

District Court for the District of Columbia pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§§ 1404(a)(2000) and 1406(a)(2000). This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292(2000); Fed.

R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Cor., 337 U.S.

541 (1949). The order Whitehead seeks to appeal is neither a final

order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See In

re Carefirst of Md., Inc., 305 F.3d 253, 257 (4th Cir. 2002).

Accordingly, we deny Whitehead’s motion for sanctions against

opposing counsel; we deny as moot his motion to stay his case

pending submission of the DVD, THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST (Twentieth

Century Home Entertainment, Inc. 2004); we deny as moot his motions

for injunctive relief, and we dismiss his appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in (a) the Registration  Statement
(Form S-8 No.  333-3212)  pertaining to the Columbus  McKinnon  Corporation 1995
Incentive  Stock Option Plan, the Columbus  McKinnon  Corporation  Non-Qualified
Stock Option Plan, the Columbus McKinnon  Corporation  Restricted Stock Plan and
the Columbus  McKinnon  Corporation  Employee Stock  Ownership Plan  Restatement
Effective  April  1,  1989  of  Columbus   McKinnon   Corporation  and  (b)  the
Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8 No.  333-81719)  pertaining  to the  Options
assumed  by  Columbus  McKinnon  Corporation  originally  granted  under  the GL
International,  Inc.  1997 Stock Option Plan and the Larco  Industrial  Services
Ltd.  1997 Stock Option Plan of our report  dated May 12, 2000,  with respect to
the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  financial  statement  schedule of
Columbus McKinnon Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended March 31, 2000.

                                                     /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Buffalo, New York
June 29, 2000
#### J. Numa Jordy, *Plaintiff in Error, v.*E. C. Maxwell, *Defendant in Error.*

*1.*Acceptanceof a lesser sum from a solvent debtor than the sum admittedly due is not a satisfaction of the balance due.

*2372. Payment in the form of a Cashier’s check upon which is written “Pull and complete settlement” is but payment *pro tanto of*a larger debt admittedly due.

This case was decided by Division A.

Writ of error to the Court of Record for Escambia County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*J. Numa Jordy, in pro per.;*

*E. G. Maxwell, in pro per.*

Cockrell, J.

— Maxwell recovered judgment against Jordy for the balance due upon an agreed attorney’s fee. The defense sought to be interposed was in the nature of an accord and satisfaction by the acceptance of a lesser amount in full settlement of the claim.

It appears that the fee agreed upon was a percentage of the amount to be recovered by Jordy in an action in the Federal Court against the J. J. McCaskill Company. Judge Maxwell succeeded in securing a verdict for the full amount claimed, but pending the consideration by the court a compromise was in negotiation between the parties and Jordy asked his attorney if he would reduce the fee, which suggestion was promptly refused. Thereafter the case having been compromised, Maxwell demanded payment of his fee, being the agreed percentage of the compromise settlement. Jordy then wrote Maxwell, enclosing check for a lesser amount, upon which was written “Full and complete settlement of fee in Jordy v. McCaskill.” The check was cashed by Maxwell, who *238promptly demanded the balance due and upon this not being done brought this action.

Whatever the holding of other courts, whether influenced by statutes or not, this court is committed to the doctrine that the accex>tance of a lesser sum from a solvent debtor than that admittedly then and there due, is not an accord and satisfaction of the entire indebtedness. There must be some fact or circumstance, some gain to the creditor or inconvenience to the debtor, to create a consideration for the release. See Spann v. Baltzell, 1 Fla. 301, text 315; Sanford v. Abrams, 24 Fla. 181, 2 South. Rep. 373; Dickerson v. Campbell, 47 Fla. 147, 35 South. Rep. 986.

There is nothing in the fact that the partial payment was made through the form of a cashier’s check. This is but one of the numerous agencies through which most of our payments between persons living in different localities are made, and is in a sense but a medium of exchange, and when accepted of no higher dignity than a payment in specie.

■The judgment is affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Shackleford, J., concur

Taylor, Hocker and Parki-iill, J. J., concur in the opinion.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1203]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Proposed Data Collection Available for Public Comment and 
Recommendations.

SUMMARY:  In accordance with the requirement of Section 3506 (c)(2)(A) 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 which provides opportunity for 
public comment on new or revised data collections, the Railroad 
Retirement Board will publish periodic summaries of proposed data 
collections.

Comments Are Invited On

    (a) Whether the proposed information collection is necessary for 
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including 
whether the information has practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 
RRB's estimate of the burden of the collection of the information; (c) 
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to 
be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden related to the 
collection of information on respondents, including the use of 
automated collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.

Title and Purpose of Information Collection

Employer's Deemed Service Month Questionnaire; OMB 3220-0156
    Section 3(i) of the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA), as amended by 
Pub. L. 98-76, provides that the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB), under 
certain circumstances, may deem additional months of service in cases 
where an employee does not actually work in every month of the year, 
provided the employee satisfies certain eligibility requirements, 
including the existence of an employment relation between the employee 
and his or her employer. The procedures pertaining to the deeming of 
additional months of service are found in the RRB's regulations at 20 
CFR part 210, Creditable Railroad Service.
    The RRB utilizes Form GL-99, Employers Deemed Service Month 
Questionnaire, to obtain service and compensation information from 
railroad employers needed to determine if an employee can be credited 
with additional deemed months of railroad service. Completion is 
mandatory. One response is required for each RRB inquiry.
    No changes are proposed to Form GL-99. The completion time for Form 
GL-99 is estimated at 2 minutes per response. The RRB estimates that 
approximately 4,000 response are received annually.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  To request more information or to 
obtain a copy of the information collection justification, forms, and/
or supporting material, please call the RRB Clearance Officer at (312) 
751-3363. Comments regarding the information collection should be 
addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 N. Rush 
Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092. Written comments should be 
received within 60 days of this notice.

Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer,
[FR Doc. 00-1203 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
Exhibit 32.2
                                 INTERDENT, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350):

I, Robert W. Hill Vice  President,  Finance &  Accounting  of  InterDent,  Inc.,
certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief,  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that:

3)   The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
     2003, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

4)   The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
     quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of InterDent,
     Inc.

Date: August 20, 2003

                                     /s/ ROBERT HILL
                                  ------------------------------------
                                     Robert W. Hill
                                     Vice President, Finance & Accounting
EXHIBIT 32.0



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Woronoco Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Cornelius D. Mahoney, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Cornelius D. MahoneyCornelius D. MahoneyChief Executive OfficerNovember 14, 2003




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Woronoco Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Woronoco Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Woronoco Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Debra L. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Debra L. MurphyDebra L. MurphyChief Financial OfficerNovember 14, 2003




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Woronoco Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Woronoco Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.