alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 88 (Friday, May 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 26215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11257]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Office of Family Assistance; Statement of Organization, Functions 
and Delegation of Authority; Correction

AGENCY: Office of Family Assistance (OFA)/ACF/DHHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends Part K of the Statement of Organization, 
Functions, and Delegations of Authority of the Department of Health and 
Human Services (DHHS), Administration of Children and Families (ACF) as 
follows: Chapter KH, The Office of Family Assistance (OFA) (65 FR 
8980), as last amended in the Federal Register on February 23, 2000. 
This notice reflects the correction of an administrative code given in 
OFA's new structure for the Division of TANF Information Network listed 
on page 8981, the first column, in the notice issued February 23, 2000.
    Delete KH.10 Organization in its entirety and replace with the 
following:
    KH.10 Organization. The Office of Family Assistance is headed by a 
Director, who reports to the Assistant Secretary for Children and 
Families. The office is organized as follows:

Office of the Director (KHA)
Division of Policy and Program Development (KHB)
Division of Technical Assistance and Training (KHC)
Division of TANF Information Network (KHG)

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Glenda D. Harden at 202-401-
5623.

    Dated: May 1, 2000.
Alvin C. Collins,
Director, Office of Family Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-11257 Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
§ 13.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* This part contains the Department of Labor's rules relating to the administration and enforcement of Executive Order 13706 (Executive Order or the Order), “Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors.” The Order states that providing paid sick leave to employees will improve the health and performance of employees of Federal contractors and will bring benefits packages offered by Federal contractors in line with model employers, ensuring they remain competitive in the search for dedicated and talented employees. The Executive Order concludes that providing paid sick leave will result in savings and quality improvements in the work performed by parties who contract with the Federal Government that will in turn lead to improved economy and efficiency in Government procurement.
( b ) *Policy.* Executive Order 13706 sets forth the general position of the Federal Government that providing access to paid sick leave on Federal contracts will increase efficiency and cost savings for the Federal Government. The Order therefore provides that executive departments and agencies shall, to the extent permitted by law, ensure that new covered contracts, contract-like instruments, and solicitations (collectively referred to as “contracts”) include a clause, which the contractor and any subcontractors shall incorporate into lower-tier subcontracts, specifying, as a condition of payment, that employees will earn not less than 1 hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked on or in connection with covered contracts.
( c ) *Scope.* Neither Executive Order 13706 nor this part creates or changes any rights under the Contract Disputes Act or creates any private right of action. The Executive Order provides that disputes regarding whether a contractor has provided paid sick leave as prescribed by the Order, to the extent permitted by law, shall be disposed of only as provided in this part. However, nothing in the Order or this part is intended to limit or preclude a civil action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3730, or criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. 1001. The Order and this part similarly do not preclude judicial review of final decisions by the Secretary of Labor in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 701 *et seq.*
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Rhodia S.A. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:

1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:
        March 30, 2007 | /S/
        JEAN-PIERRE CLAMADIEU                                  
|---------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                             | Jean-Pierre
        Clamadieu
      Chief
        Executive Officer



|Date:
        March 30, 2007 | /S/
        PASCAL BOUCHIAT                                                                                   
|---------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                             | Pascal
        Bouchiat
      Group
        Executive Vice President and
      Chief
        Financial Officer
ATTACHMENT B

EMAIL NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING ON

THE STATE IMPEMENTATION PLAN REVISION FOR

FEDERAL NITROGEN DIOXIDE STANDARD INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS

What's New List Serve Post Display

BELOW IS THE LIST SERVE POST YOU SELECTED TO DISPLAY.

ARBCOMBO -- NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING FOR NOVEMBER 15, 2012

Posted: 15 Oct 2012 14:31:36

The Air Resources Board will conduct a public meeting to consider approval of the 

Proposed State Implementation Plan Revision for Federal Nitrogen Dioxide Standard 

Infrastructure Requirements. 

Interested members of the public may present comments orally or in writing at the 

meeting and comments may be submitted by postal mail or by electronic submittal 

before the meeting. To be considered by the Board, written comments not physically 

submitted at the meeting must be received no later than 12:00 noon, November 14, 

2012, and addressed to the following:

Postal mail: Clerk of the Board, Air Resources Board

1001 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814

Electronic submittal: 

http://www.arb.ca.gov/lispub/comm/bclist.php 

Copies of the proposed NO2 Infrastructure SIP will be available at ARB’s Public 

Information Office,1001 I Street, First Floor, Environmental Services Center, 

Sacramento, California, 95814, (916) 322 2990 beginning October 15, 2012. The 

document may also be accessed on ARB’s website at:

http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/sip.htm.

Further inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to Ms. Gayle Sweigert, 

Manager, Air Quality Analysis Section, at (916) 322-6923 or Ms. Marcella Nystrom, Staff 

Air Pollution Specialist, at (916) 323-8543.

Thank you

You are receiving this single arbcombo email because you are a subscriber to or have 

made a public comment to one or more of the following lists: board, desig, sip.
§ 91.191 Category II and Category III manual. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, after August 4, 1997, no person may operate a U.S.-registered civil aircraft in a Category II or a Category III operation unless— ( 1 ) There is available in the aircraft a current and approved Category II or Category III manual, as appropriate, for that aircraft;
( 2 ) The operation is conducted in accordance with the procedures, instructions, and limitations in the appropriate manual; and
( 3 ) The instruments and equipment listed in the manual that are required for a particular Category II or Category III operation have been inspected and maintained in accordance with the maintenance program contained in the manual.
( b ) Each operator must keep a current copy of each approved manual at its principal base of operations and must make each manual available for inspection upon request by the Administrator.
( c ) This section does not apply to operations conducted by a certificate holder operating under part 121 or part 135 of this chapter or a holder of management specifications issued in accordance with subpart K of this part.
[Doc. No. 26933, 61 FR 34560, July 2, 1996, as amended by Amdt. 91-280, 68 FR 54560, Sept. 17, 2003]
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of M Line Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Colin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May 16, 2011
/s/ George ColinBy:  George ColinIts:  Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to M Line Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by M Line Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
=e

et rg) : a
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

wth

v 164°30°

APPROXIMATE SURVEY

4
oD Anch
< ne
SO y rey,
J , a
aS a yo
» 5S oC
yd ~
z |
'
100 ie) 100 200 300 miles
a
Scale v
INDEX MAP OF ALASKA SHOWING LOCATION OF SEWARD PENINSULA AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL
SURVEYS, 1968. SEE DETAILED INDEX FOR ACTUAL COVERAGE.
“- [ a = -
: wo — ap rein pe erence " pie
>
‘ 2
165°30' 164°30°
66° 45° .
%
+ a:
HORIZONTAL SCALE_-__________ 1:63,360 66°15"
sayz our INTERVAL 2 ags——-- ~e5-+- 20 GAMMA ;
20 GAMMA conTouR-_---------- —~__ ~ (ga HL {SERPENTINE HOT SPRINGS
od " eseas' to Zi -——— 65°45" AREA » . rm
j “190. ghiaa, TO! --2-e-- - i anea “
; ry aes sonenna--------- Ga aes : " > » 4
ETIC MAXIMUM / MINIMUM... — —— aw a had |_f sree ’ i .
3 ' ? : ¥ os INDEX MAP SHOWING DETAILED LOCATION OF
SURVEY ALTITUDE -----=-_ -----+-2,500' ASL ° ._ 4 { T
Maud Conte : I - AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS IN- SEWARD
4 Besa > dhe. y PENINSULA, 1968, COVERAGE CONFINED TO ;
a, eS NED ) thes PLUS
G, WUffy LETTERED 3
Y tj ‘
3
fe i.” Y0.J“Zz . a <a, \
er Fs fear 9 10,11 ig a teem A)

isis Bb. ee oe he.

rs

EF GEOPHYSICA

Hn:

Rie:

‘les ail

ag
=
il
‘ 7
Th
7
#.
YY
my

ee
#### Edwin V. Hellawell, as Receiver of the First National Bank of Hempstead, Respondent, *v.*Charles Baer et al., Defendants, and Carrie E. Pray, as Administratrix of the Estate of Elias J. Pray, Deceased, et al., Appellants.

Submitted January 4, 1937;

decided January 12, 1937.

*Perlie P. Fallon*for motion.

*Ferdinand I. Haber*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements, this not being a final order in a special proceeding.
#### HEADLEY v. THE STATE.

(Decided April 6, 1916.)

Appeal from Chilton Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General
Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ LEO F. WELLS, III  
| |  | Leo F. Wells, III      
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | May 13, 2010           



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
| |  | Douglas P. Williams    
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | May 13, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandra M. Peay or Parcellena P. Fielding, Contact Representatives, Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room 303, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3100.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-12127 Filed 5-12-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

38 39 40



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 07/19 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
500 New Jersey Avenue, NW

7 th Floor

Washington, D.C. 20001 December 17, 2010

Mr. Keith Barnett

Metals and Minerals Group (D243

- 02)

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Re: NESHAP Issues/Meeting Request to Discuss

Dear Keith

,

Att ached please find an Excel spreadsheet which identifies a number of issues

addressed in the NESHAP

, published on September 9, 2010, which PCA believes need

clarification and/or revision. This is the list that we have spoken about previously and is in

addi tion to those issues addressed by the petition for reconsideration PCA sent to EPA on

November 5, 2010.

PCA would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you to discuss these issues at

your earliest convenience in January 2011. I may be reached at (202 ) 408

- 9494 or

aohare@cement.org to make arrangements for such a meeting.

Sincerely,

Andrew T. O’Hare

Vice President , Regulatory Affairs

Cc: Peter Tsirigotis, EPA

- OAQPS
Searched for **http://www.fmshrc.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.fmshrc.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
c59401_ex10-2.htm -- Converted by SEC Publisher, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing








Exhibit 10.2


Document Issued by Yunnan Provincial



Department of Commerce 




August 21, 2009

 

Written Reply to the Pledge of Stock Rights by

  

  Kunming Shenghuo Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. 


To Kunming Shenghuo Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 


         Upon the application and relevant materials you have submitted to our Department with respect to the pledge of stock rights held by your company, we hereby approve your application in accordance with provisions of current laws
and regulations stipulated by Chinese government and that pledge 94.95% of stock rights held by your shareholder of China Shenghuo Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc. to Kunming Shuanglong Branch of Agricultural Bank of China. You are required to bring
with this Written Reply and relevant documents to register in industry and commerce administration authorities and other relative authorities within 30 days since the date after you have received this Written Reply. And then you can submit an
application to our Department on the change of pledge after the registration of change in stock rights has been done.  
















Notice on Establishment Registration of



Pledge of Stock Rights 


August 21, 2009


To China Shenghuo Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc. and Kunming


Shuanglong Branch of Agricultural Bank of China, 


     Upon your application, we, Kunming Municipal Administration of for Industry and Commerce of Yunnan Province hereby keep a record for your pledge of stock rights, and the pledge right shall become
effective as of the date of registration. Details of the registration are as follow: 






Registration No.: 53010000006 



Stock Rights Pledged Company: Kunming
Shenghuo Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. 



The Amount of Pledged Stock Rights: 7525.74 



The Pledger: China Shenghuo Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc. 



The Pledgee: Kunming Shuanglong
Branch of Agricultural Bank of China  



 

Note: Copies of this Notice are delivered as per the numbers of applicants
#### SPUSTA v BERNOW et

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9103.

Decided Jan 14, 1929

*91F. J. Kmiecik, Cleveland, for Spusta.

McConnell, Blackmore & Cory, Cleveland, for Bernow.

Middleton, PJ and Mauck, J of the 4th Dist and Farr, J of the 7th Dist sitting.

MIDDLETON, PJ

It is clear from the plaintiff’s own evidence, that he did not see the taxicab at all and knew nothing of its approach until he was struck. The only remaining eye witness to the accident was one Peter Golab. This witness was called by the plaintiff and testified that he was coming up Auburn Street and noticed a man standing on the corner. This man proved to be the plaintiff. The witness said that a taxicab went past him travelling at about thirty miles per hour or more. He heard the brakes squeak and turned around, and saw the man going through the air.

This witness further testified that he saw the taxicab in question, some two or three blocks distant. His testimony in that particular is as follows:

> Q. “You first noticed this cab ■ two or three blocks?”

> A. “I was watching it because I was going to cross the street myself.”

> Q. “You were going to cross the street yourself, so you watched this particular cab?”

There is nothing in the evidence to show that the crossing, taken by the plaintiff was controlled by any signals of any kind and it follows that he had no right of way across the street, but that it was necessary for him to observe what was approaching, in the way of traffic from both sides of the crossing. He testified he could not see the taxicab. He does not explain in any way or manner why he could not see that machine as it approached. He calls another witness who, testified that he was in the immediate vicinity of where the plaintiff was when he started across the street and he, the witness, saw the taxicab coming some two or three blocks away and that he was watching it because he intended to cross the street himself.

In the absence of any further explanation by plaintiff, in respect to his failure to see the taxicab, and in view of the positive evidence of ljis own witness, that the taxicab could be seen and seen for some distance away, it seems to us that the failure of the plaintiff to know of the approach of this taxicab under all these facts, raises a presumption of contributory negligence on his part.

The testimony of Golab, we- think furnishes a concrete example of the case of a reasonably prudent person under the conditions surrounding the plaintiff at the time he was injured. It is clear from Golab’s testimony that he saw the approach of the taxicab and was fully advised of his surroundings.

Mauck and Farr, JJ, concur.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)**

**OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Brian P. McAndrews, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of aQuantive, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 11, 2004