alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice 00-051] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the Centennial of Flight Commission. 

# DATES:

Monday, June 19, 2000, 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

                        Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum, 7th and Independence Avenue, SW, Director's Conference Room, 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20560. Attendees must                               ( print page 31017)                            check in at the Information Desk to be cleared to the 3rd floor.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Beverly Farmarco, Code ZC, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-1903. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as follows: 

—First Flight Centennial Foundation of North Carolina 

—Inventing Flight of Dayton, Ohio 

—Logo Use Policy 

It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. 

Visitors will be requested to sign a visitor's register. 

Dated: May 9, 2000.

Matthew M. Crouch, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

[FR Doc. 00-12050 Filed 5-12-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
#### § 1202.3 Representation disputes.

If any dispute shall arise among a carrier's employees as to who are the representatives of such employees designated and authorized in accordance with the requirements of the Railway Labor Act, it is the duty of the Board, upon request of either party to the dispute, to investigate such dispute and certify to both parties, in writing, the name or names of individuals or organizations that have been designated and authorized to represent the employees involved in the dispute, and to certify the same to the carrier.
Emailing: 2005.bmp

Ralph DeSiena to: Cleveland Holladay 11/10/2011 04:56 PM

2 attachments

2005.bmp 2005.txt

 2005 met
[Nos. 27571-6-II; 27598-8-II; 27601-1-II; 27608-9-II.

Division Two.

November 1, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Anthony Gene Hand, *Appellant.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Pierce County, Nos. 01-1-01673-5, 01-1-01946-7, 00-1-01381-9, and 01-1-01089-3, Frederick W Fleming, J., entered June 19, 2001. *Remanded*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, C.J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Armstrong, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11691]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed During the Week Ending 
April 28, 2000

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 412 and 414. Answers 
may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application.

    Docket Number: OST-2000-7289.
    Date Filed: April 26, 2000.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: CBPP/5/Reso/003/99 dated September 8, 1999
    Finally Adopted Resos & Recommended Practices r1-3
    Minutes--CBPP/5/Meet r-1-600a r-2-606 r-3-RP1600d
    Intended effective date: November 17, 1999.

    Docket Number: OST-2000-7313.
    Date Filed: April 27, 2000.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Mail Vote 075 Resolution 002
    TC1/TC12 USA/US Territories--Austria, Belgium, Chile, Germany, 
Italy, Netherlands, Scandinavia, Switzerland Standard Revalidating/
Adopting/Amending Resolution
Intended effective date: 1 October 2000.

    Docket Number: OST-2000-7314.
    Date Filed: April 27, 2000.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC2 EUR 0307 dated 18 April 2000 TC2 Within Europe 
Expedited Resolution 002d
Intended effective date: 15 May 2000.

Andrea M. Jenkins,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 00-11691 Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4821 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4821

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to clarify that utility line 
          technicians qualify as emergency response providers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 20 (legislative day, October 19), 2020

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to clarify that utility line 
          technicians qualify as emergency response providers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROVIDERS.

    Section 2(6) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 101(6)) 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``includes Federal'' and inserting 
        ``includes--
                    ``(A) Federal'';
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``; 
        and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) utility line technicians responding to a 
                major disaster or an emergency declared by the 
                President under section 501 of the Robert T. Stafford 
                Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 
                5191).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 91.11 Prohibition on interference with crewmembers.

No person may assault, threaten, intimidate, or interfere with a crewmember in the performance of the crewmember's duties aboard an aircraft being operated.
#### YOUGSTOWN PACKING & PROVISION CO v GALIATO et

Ohio Appeals, 7th Dist, Mahoning Co

Decided April 5, 1929

Ewing & Ewing, Youngstown, for Packing Co.

D W Mumaw, Youngstown, for Galiato et.

*295FARR, J.

After an examination of these sections the court is of the opinion that Section 11105 applies, and this section carries the provision that in order to set aside such conveyance for fraud the grantee in the conveyance must have knowledge of the intended fraud.

There is the further question as to the right of Frank Galiato to be reimbursed for any improvements he may have made upon this property, and, there is testimony going to show that he did make improvements to the amount of about $1,000. In view of the fact that the court reached the conclusion that Section 11105 GC. applies, and that there is not sufficient testimony in this record to bring home to Frank Galiato guilty knowledge as to the purpose of the transfer from his brother Patsy to him, Frank Galiato may be entitled to be reimbursed for the betterments he placed upon the property after he acquired or believed he had acquired title to the same. However, the law relating, to occupying claimants may be applied in that regard and when the cause is certified to the Court of Common Pleas for such proceedings as are authorized by law, whatever rights Frank Galiato may have .as to these betterments upon the property should be worked out and determined according to the provisions of the occupying claimant law in Ohio.

It is also contended that whatever' consideration passed between Frank Galiato and his brother Patsy, had passed at a period previous to the making of the intended deed, and it is claimed that a preexisting debt could not be and was not in the instant case a sufficient considertion. After having examined this question the conclusion is that a pre-existing debt would be a sufficient consideration for this property, and especially is that proposition good in view of the fact that the court reaches the conclusion that whether the deed is good or not that Frank Galiato for want of guilty knowledge may be entitled to have returned to him or secured to him the return of whatever money he invested in this property.

The plaintiff, the Packing & Provision Company, obtained its judgment and it is significant that P,atsy near the time of the securing of this judgment executed the deed to his brother Frank. This perhaps would fasten upon Patsy guilty knowledge or guilty purpose in making the transfer, but would not necessarily bring home to his brother Frank the same knowledge obtaining upon the part of Patsy in transferring his property.

For the reasons given the same judgment will be entered as below and the cause certified back to the court of common pleas for such proceedings as are authorized by law, where the mortgage company holding the mortgage executed by Frank Galiato may have its interests adjudicated. So that the same judgment will be entered here as below and the cause certified back to the court of common pleas for such proceedings as are authorized by law.

Pollock and Roberts, JJ, concur.
§ 16.107 Allowable fees and expenses. ( a ) The following fees and other expenses are allowable under the Act: ( 1 ) Reasonable expenses of expert witnesses;
( 2 ) Reasonable cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, or project necessary for the preparation of the party's case;
( 3 ) Reasonable attorney or agent fees;
( b ) Awards will be based on the prevailing market rates for the kind and quality of services furnished not to exceed the rates set forth in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) No award under these rules for the fee of an attorney or agent may exceed $125.00 per hour. No award to compensate an expert witness may exceed $24.09 per hour.
( d ) In determining the reasonableness of the fee sought, the adjudicative officer shall consider the following: ( 1 ) The prevailing rate for similar services in the community in which the attorney, agent or witness ordinarily performs services;
( 2 ) The time actually spent in the representation of the applicant;
( 3 ) The difficulty or complexity of the issues in the proceeding;
( 4 ) Such other factors as may bear on the value of the services performed.
[46 FR 63021, Dec. 29, 1981, as amended at 72 FR 37098, July 9, 2007]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12



                      BRAND SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                 RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES CALCULATION
                       (In thousands except ratio amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Year Ended         Year Ended     Year Ended
                                                               December 31,       December 31,    December 31,
                                                                   2000               1999           1998
                                                                 --------           --------       --------
<S>                                                             <C>              <C>             <C>
EARNINGS:
   Pretax income (loss)                                          $    816           $ (1,863)      $    584
   Fixed charges                                                   27,607             23,833         23,008
    Accretion of preferred stock dividends                         (6,338)            (5,497)        (4,767)
                                                                 --------           --------       --------
           Earnings                                                22,085             16,473         18,825
                                                                 --------           --------       --------
FIXED CHARGES:
   Interest expense                                                20,414             17,758         17,728
   Interest portion of rental expense                                 855                578            513
   Accretion of preferred stock dividends                           6,338              5,497          4,767
                                                                 --------           --------       --------
           Total fixed charges                                   $ 27,607           $ 23,833       $ 23,008
                                                                 ========           ========       ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock
   dividends (1)                                                     0.8x               0.7x           0.8x
</TABLE>






(1) For the purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges and
preferred stock dividends, earnings represent income (loss) before income taxes
plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense on all
indebtedness plus the interest portion of rental expense on noncancelable
leases, amortization of debt issuance costs and accretion of preferred stock
dividends. The deficiency of earnings to cover fixed charges for the years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 were $5,522, $7,360 and $4,183, respectively.
Exhibit
23.1




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board
of Directors


Pulaski
Financial Corp.:





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-32986, No. 333-84392, No. 333-84515,
No. 333-112962, No. 333-135895, No. 333-157740, and No. 333-161784) on
Form S-8 and in the registration statements (No. 333-128997 and No.
333-161783) on Form S-3 of Pulaski Financial Corp. and subsidiaries (the
Company) of our report dated December 17, 2010, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of September 30, 2010 and
2009, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive
income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended September 30, 2010, and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2010, which
report is incorporated by reference in the September 30, 2010 annual report
on Form 10-K of the Company.




/s/KPMG LLP




St.
Louis, Missouri


December 17,
2010
#### § 1610.6 [Reserved]
[No. 49699-9-I.

Division One.

October 21, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. T.S., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 01-8-04508-5, Dale B. Ramerman, J., entered December 7, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>


                      Exhibit 27.1 Financial Data Schedule

This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from financial
statements  as at  September  30,  1999  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference to such financial statements:
</LEGEND>



<S>                                  <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                      sep-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                           sep-30-1999
<CASH>                                                                 4,474,174
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          1,447,455
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           16,352
<INVENTORY>                                                            53,873
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       6,139,410
<PP&E>                                                                 1,099,606
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         234,745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                         7,239,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                  960,023
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                               6,681,315
<OTHER-SE>                                                             (402,322)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                           7,239,016
<SALES>                                                                6,825,302
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       7,043,353
<CGS>                                                                  2,017,506
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          2,017,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       4,517,616
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        508,231
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           277,751
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           230,480
<EPS-BASIC>                                                            .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          .04



</TABLE>
§ 382.19 May carriers refuse to provide transportation on the basis of disability? ( a ) As a carrier, you must not refuse to provide transportation to a passenger with a disability on the basis of his or her disability, except as specifically permitted by this part.
( b ) You must not refuse to provide transportation to a passenger with a disability because the person's disability results in appearance or involuntary behavior that may offend, annoy, or inconvenience crewmembers or other passengers.
( c ) You may refuse to provide transportation to any passenger on the basis of safety, as provided in 49 U.S.C. 44902 or 14 CFR 121.533, or to any passenger whose carriage would violate FAA or TSA requirements or applicable requirements of a foreign government. ( 1 ) You can determine that there is a disability-related safety basis for refusing to provide transportation to a passenger with a disability if you are able to demonstrate that the passenger poses a direct threat (see definition in § 382.3). In determining whether an individual poses a direct threat, you must make an individualized assessment, based on reasonable judgment that relies on current medical knowledge or on the best available objective evidence, to ascertain: ( i ) The nature, duration, and severity of the risk;
( ii ) The probability that the potential harm to the health and safety of others will actually occur; and
( iii ) Whether reasonable modifications of policies, practices, or procedures will mitigate the risk.
( 2 ) If you determine that the passenger does pose a direct threat, you must select the least restrictive response from the point of view of the passenger, consistent with protecting the health and safety of others. For example, you must not refuse transportation to the passenger if you can protect the health and safety of others by means short of a refusal.
( 3 ) In exercising this authority, you must not act inconsistently with the provisions of this part.
( 4 ) If your actions are inconsistent with any of the provisions of this part, you are subject to enforcement action under Subpart K of this part.
( d ) If you refuse to provide transportation to a passenger on his or her originally-scheduled flight on a basis relating to the individual's disability, you must provide to the person a written statement of the reason for the refusal. This statement must include the specific basis for the carrier's opinion that the refusal meets the standards of paragraph (c) of this section or is otherwise specifically permitted by this part. You must provide this written statement to the person within 10 calendar days of the refusal of transportation.