alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 102.50 Hearings before the Board or a Board Member.

Whenever the Board deems it necessary to effectuate the purposes of the Act or to avoid unnecessary costs or delay, it may, at any time, after a complaint has issued pursuant to § 102.15 or § 102.33, order that such complaint and any proceeding which may have been instituted with respect thereto be transferred to and continued before it or any Board Member. The provisions of this subpart, insofar as applicable, govern proceedings before the Board or any Board Member pursuant to this section, and the powers granted to Administrative Law Judges in such provisions will, for the purpose of this section, be reserved to and exercised by the Board or the Board Member who will preside.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,389,014
<SECURITIES>                                 2,054,707
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,298,449
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,089,133
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,321,083
<PP&E>                                       5,015,297
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,737,161
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,863,845
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,177,807
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,737,161
<SALES>                                      4,214,020
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,214,020
<CGS>                                        2,934,465
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,191,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (46,775)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,275
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             41,275
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,275
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intelligent Living Corp. (formerly Elgrande.com, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael F. Holloran, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



DATED:

October 20, 2009

/s/ Michael F. Holloran

-----------------------------

Michael F. Holloran;

Chief Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer
#### MUTUAL LOAN SOCIETY, INC. v. MONTGOMERY.

(Decided November 28, 1916.)

Appeal from Birmingham City Court.

Heard before Hon. H. A. Sharpe.

G. W. Yancey, for appellant.

David S. Anderson, for appellee.

Pelham, P. J.

Affirmed on authority of *Mut. Loan Soc., Inc., v. C. T. Stowe, infra,*73 South. 202.
#### BERMAN v MacGREGOR, Admr. etc

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co.

No. 9792.

Decided June 3, 1929

E. A. Binyon, Esq., Cleveland, for Berman.

Garfield, Cross, MacGregor, Daoust & Baldwin, Cleveland, for MacGregor.

*406VICKERY, PJ.

In the case of Towne vs. The National Machinery Company, 10 Ohio App. Rep. page 265, Judge Richards writing the opinion of the Court in the Sixth District, in which motion to certify the case was overruled February 5th, 1928, held that an order granting a motion to quash service of summons was not a final order from which error could be taken; that it was necessary to have the case disposed of and and a final entry in the case before an error of that kind could be prosecuted, and we are inclined to follow that authority.

We do not think that at the present time there is anything before this court in which we can adjudicate the rights of the parties, and we think that a motion to quash the service of summons being granted in the original case, the original defendant MacGregor being, still in the Court of Common Pleas, the order granting that motion to quash was not such a final order to which error can be prosecuted. The motion, therefore, to dismiss the petition in error is well taken and will be granted and, of course, that will dispose of the entire case so far as it now stands in this court.

The entry will be: Motion granted, petition in error dismissed.

Sullivan and Levine, JJ, concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 21

#### Editorial Notes:

1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

#### § 21.16 Special conditions.

If the FAA finds that the airworthiness regulations of this subchapter do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller because of a novel or unusual design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller, he prescribes special conditions and amendments thereto for the product. The special conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 of this chapter and contain such safety standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the FAA finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established in the regulations.

[Amdt. 21-19, 32 FR 17851, Dec. 13, 1967, as amended by Amdt. 21-51, 45 FR 60170, Sept. 11, 1980]
#### DARDONE v. THE STATE.

(Decided April 20, 1916.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. Wm. E. Fort.

Prosch & Prosch, and M. H. Murphy, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed by appellant.
# EUR-Lex - 31998D0498 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998D0498

**98/498/CFSP: Council Decision of 10 August 1998 amending Common Position 96/184/CFSP defined by the Council on the basis of Article J.2 of the Treaty on European Union concerning arms exports to the former Yugoslavia **

*
Official Journal L 225 , 12/08/1998 P. 0001 - 0001 *

COUNCIL DECISION of 10 August 1998 amending Common Position 96/184/CFSP defined by the Council on the basis of Article J.2 of the Treaty on European Union concerning arms exports to the former Yugoslavia (98/498/CFSP)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article J.2 thereof,

Having regard to Common Position 96/184/CFSP of 26 February 1996 defined by the Council on the basis of Article J.2 of the Treaty on European Union concerning arms exports to the former Yougoslavia (1),

Whereas the Council has come to the conclusion that developments in Slovenia, in particular its policy with regard to arms exports, justifies a lifting of the restrictive measures of Common Position 96/184/CFSP in respect of that State,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

References to Slovenia in point 2(ii) of Common Position 96/184/CFSP are hereby deleted.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal.

Done at Brussels, 10 August 1998.

For the Council

The President

W. SCHÜSSEL

(1) OJ L 58, 7. 3. 1996, p. 1.
Phantom-Maintenance

From DJI Wiki

Remove the Housing

◾ 1. Remove all the nuts and propellers by using the assistant wrench. 

◾ 2. Remove the screws marked in the figure below using a Phillips Screwdriver and a Hexagon 

Screwdriver, and then remove the housing. 

Note:

◾ Please take good care of the removed parts, for example, screws. Make sure to keep them safe and away 

from children. 

◾ DO NOT use any thread locker, since the thread locker may corrode the shell of Phantom, may cause 

fractures. 

Phantom-Maintenance - DJI Wiki Page 1 of 2

http://wiki.dji.com/en/index.php/Phantom-Maintenance 4/19/2015
Extension Power

There is an extension power cable in the Phantom for DIY use. The voltage from the Extension Power Cable is 

the same voltage as the power battery. The red cable is for positive and the grey cable is for negative. Make sure 

to keep the red cable and the grey cable separated, to avoid short circuit. 

Retrieved from "http://wiki.dji.com/en/index.php?title=Phantom-Maintenance&oldid=19862" 

◾ This page was last modified on 22 March 2013, at 03:49.

◾ This page has been accessed 12,951 times.

Phantom-Maintenance - DJI Wiki Page 2 of 2

http://wiki.dji.com/en/index.php/Phantom-Maintenance 4/19/2015
EXHIBIT 32.0



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Woronoco Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Cornelius D. Mahoney, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Cornelius D. MahoneyCornelius D. MahoneyChief Executive OfficerAugust 16, 2004




---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Woronoco Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Debra L. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Debra L. MurphyDebra L. MurphyChief Financial OfficerAugust 16, 2004
dwstex3202.htm


    
       

      
         


      

    


    EXHIBIT
32.02

    


    


    CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

    18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

    AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

    SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    


    


    


    


    In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Spectrum
Technical L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter
Management LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     

    
      	
              (1)  

            	
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

            


    

     

    
      	
              (2)  

            	
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.

            


    

     

    


     

    


     

    


     

    


    


    


    
      	 
      	
              By:

            	
              /s/
      Christian Angstadt

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Name:

            	
              Christian
      Angstadt

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Title:

            	
              Chief
      Financial Officer of

            	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
              Demeter
      Management LLC,

            	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
              general
      partner of the registrant

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Date:

            	
              November
      13, 2009
#### DAVIS et v JONES et

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist, Williams Co

No. 175.

Decided October 21, 1929

Messrs. Rheinfrank, Simmons, Lindecker & Lamb, Toledo, and H. H. DeMuth, Bryan, for Davis et.

Messrs. Chas. E. Scott, Bryan, and Geo. C. Rings, West Unity, for Jones et.

*662WILLIAMS, J.

We are of the opinion that the court erred in overruling the motion. It appears from the record that the decree of March 1, 1929, was entered without notice to the defendants Angeline May Davis and Fred E. Davis, and was made without a revivor of the action in the name of the executrix of the last will and testament of the decedent. As her legatee and devisee under the last will and testament of decedent, Angeline May Davis was entitled to her day in court and no valid decree binding upon the estate of the decedent could be entered without a revivor.

For the reasons given the judgment of the court &glow will be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings according to law.

Lloyd and Richards, JJ., concur.
[No. 27241-5-II.

Division Two.

November 26, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jerome Clarence Ellis, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 99-1-03828-4, Stephanie A. Arend, J., entered April 13, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Morgan and Houghton, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4540 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4540

To provide that individuals may serve as poll workers for the November 
   3, 2020, general election if registered to vote in the State in a 
    location other than the location at which the individual serves.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 8, 2020

 Mr. Merkley (for himself, Mr. Wyden, Ms. Hirono, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. 
 Kaine, Mr. Warner, and Ms. Klobuchar) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that individuals may serve as poll workers for the November 
   3, 2020, general election if registered to vote in the State in a 
    location other than the location at which the individual serves.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Poll Worker Recruitment Act of 
2020''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL RULES FOR POLL WORKER REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE 
              2020 GENERAL ELECTION.

    A State or local jurisdiction may not prohibit an individual from 
serving as a poll worker in the general election for Federal office 
occurring on November 3, 2020, solely because such individual is 
registered to vote in the State in a county or jurisdiction other than 
the county or jurisdiction in which such individual serves as a poll 
worker in such election.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1902.33 Developmental period.

Upon the commencement of plan operations after the initial approval of a State's plan by the Assistant Secretary, a State has three years in which to complete all of the developmental steps specified in the plan as approved. Section 1953.4 of this chapter sets forth the procedures for the submission and consideration of developmental changes by OSHA. Generally, whenever a State completes a developmental step, it must submit the resulting plan change as a supplement to its plan to OSHA for approval. OSHA's approval of such changes is then published in the Federal Register.

[80 FR 49904, Aug. 18, 2015]
# EUR-Lex - 31999D0085 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999D0085

**1999/85/EC: Commission Decision of 1 February 1999 amending Decision 87/257/EEC on the list of establishments in the United States of America approved for the purpose of importing fresh meat into the Community (notified under document number C(1999) 233) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 027 , 02/02/1999 P. 0032 - 0036 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 1 February 1999 amending Decision 87/257/EEC on the list of establishments in the United States of America approved for the purpose of importing fresh meat into the Community (notified under document number C(1999) 233) (Text with EEA relevance) (1999/85/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems on importation of bovine, ovine and caprine animals and swine, fresh meat or meat products from third countries (1), as last amended by Directive 97/79/EC (2), and in particular Articles 4(1) and 18(1) thereof,

Whereas a list of establishments in the United States of America, approved for the purpose of importing fresh meat into the Community, was drawn up initially by Commission Decision 87/257/EEC (3) as last amended by Decision 98/473/EC (4); whereas that list may be amended at any time in the light of the results of Community inspections carried out in the United States of America;

Whereas negotiations are under way to conclude an agreement with the United States on health measures to protect public health and animal health in the context of trade in livestock and products of animal origin;

Whereas this situation, progress already achieved, and the need to avoid distortion of trade justify the postponement of the deadline established for the landing of certain fresh meat, from 31 January 1999 to 30 April 1999; whereas the fixing of this date is without prejudice either to the date of conclusion or to the content of the abovementioned agreement;

Whereas the list of establishments must be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 87/257/EEC is hereby replaced by the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 February 1999.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28.

(2) OJ L 24, 30. 1. 1998, p. 31.

(3) OJ L 121, 9. 5. 1987, p. 46.

(4) OJ L 209, 25. 7. 1998, p. 54.

ANNEX

>TABLE>
#### § 25.1733 Fire detector systems, general: EWIS.

EWIS associated with any installed fire protection system, including those required by §§ 25.854 and 25.858, must be considered an integral part of the system in showing compliance with the applicable requirements for that system.
# EUR-Lex - 31999D0476 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31999D0476

**Decision No 476/1999/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 February 1999 amending Decision No 2085/97/EC establishing a programme of support, including translation, in the field of books and reading (Ariane) **

*
Official Journal L 057 , 05/03/1999 P. 0001 - 0001 *

DECISION No 476/1999/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 22 February 1999 amending Decision No 2085/97/EC establishing a programme of support, including translation, in the field of books and reading (Ariane)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 128 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions (2),

Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189b of the Treaty (3),

Whereas Decision No 2085/97/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (4) establishes a programme of support, including translation, in the field of books and reading (the 'Ariane programme`) for the period 1 January 1997 to 31 December 1998;

Whereas the third paragraph of Article 8 of that Decision provides for any suitable measure to be taken to avoid interruption of the programme;

Whereas the Commission presented a proposal to the European Parliament and the Council on 28 May 1998 for a Decision establishing a single financing and programming instrument for cultural cooperation for the period 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2004;

Whereas, pending adoption of that proposal, there is a need to ensure the continuity of cultural action by the European Community in the areas covered by the Ariane programme,

HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Decision No 2085/97/EC is hereby amended as follows:

1. in Article 1, '31 December 1998` shall be replaced by '31 December 1999`.

2. in Article 6, 'ECU 7 million` shall be replaced by 'EUR 11,1 million`.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 January 1999.

Done at Brussels, 22 February 1999.

For the European Parliament

The President

J. M. GIL-ROBLES

For the Council

The President

K.-H. FUNKE

(1) OJ C 319, 16. 10. 1998, p. 13, and OJ C 372, 2. 12. 1998, p. 28.

(2) OJ C 51, 22. 2. 1999, p. 92.

(3) Opinion of the European Parliament of 9 October 1998 (OJ C 328, 26. 10. 1998, p. 237), Council Common Position of 20 November 1998 (OJ C 404, 23. 12. 1998, p. 17) and Decision of the European Parliament of 17 December 1998 (not yet published in the Official Journal). Council Decision of 8 February 1999.

(4) OJ L 291, 24. 10. 1997, p. 26.
#### § 100.501 Purpose.

The purpose of this regulation is to effectuate section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to prohibit discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the United States Postal Service.