alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31998D0494 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998D0494

**98/494/EC: Commission Decision of 22 July 1998 approving the monitoring plan for the detection of residues or substances in live animals and animal products presented by Denmark (notified under document number C(1998) 2166/3) (Only the Danish text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 223 , 11/08/1998 P. 0009 - 0009 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 22 July 1998 approving the monitoring plan for the detection of residues or substances in live animals and animal products presented by Denmark (notified under document number C(1998) 2166/3) (Only the Danish text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (98/494/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and repealing Directives 85/358/EEC and 86/469/EEC and Decisions 89/187/EEC and 91/664/EEC (1), and in particular the first and second subparagraphs of Article 8(1) thereof,

Whereas Denmark forwarded to the Commission, in a document dated 30 June 1997, a plan specifying the national measures to be implemented during 1998 for the detection of certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products; whereas that plan was amended by a document dated 2 March and 4 June 1998, in accordance with the Commission's request, bringing it into line with the requirements of Directive 96/23/EC;

Whereas examination of this plan has shown that it complies with Directive 96/23/EC, and in particular Articles 5 and 7 thereof;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The monitoring plan for the detection of the residues and substances referred to in Annex I to Directive 96/23/EC in live animals and animal products presented by Denmark is hereby approved.

Article 2

Denmark shall adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement the plan referred to in Article 1.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Denmark.

Done at Brussels, 22 July 1998.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 125, 23. 5. 1996, p. 10.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 1 0 56 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 - CE - 0 46 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II

DONALD W. WRIGHT, No. 48829-9-II

Appellant, (consolidated with)

No. 48882-5-II

v.

WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT

OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Respondent.

WORSWICK, P.J. — Donald Wright appeals the trial court’s February 8, 2016 order denying 

notice of appeal, which denied, as untimely filed, his notice of appeal from the Department of 

Labor and Industries’ November 23, 2015 decision and order. The Department concedes that there 

were significant delays between when the Department issued its decision and when Wright 

received it, and between when Wright mailed his notice of appeal and when the trial court received 

it, both caused by the prison mail system. It therefore concedes that Wright’s notice of appeal was 

timely filed, and asks that the appeal be remanded to the trial court.

We accept the concession. The trial court’s order denying notice of appeal is reversed and 

Wright’s appeal is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

Filed

Washington State

Court of Appeals

Division Two

December 20, 2016
No. 48829-9-II

Cons. with No. 48882-5-II

2

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the 

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040, 

it is so ordered.

Worswick, P.J.

We concur:

Lee, J.

Sutton, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001063018
<NAME>                        ISG Resources, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1.000
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,496,616
<ALLOWANCES>                                       329,000
<INVENTORY>                                      4,055,425
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,046,921
<PP&E>                                          41,477,562
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,893,374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 220,462,511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,075,120
<BONDS>                                        133,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,161,804
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   220,462,511
<SALES>                                        120,319,575
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               156,205,272
<CGS>                                           83,442,725
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  142,883,926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,391,944
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    285,177
<INCOME-TAX>                                       647,589
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (362,412)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (362,412)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
#### § 1471.525 Whom do I ask if I have questions about a person in the EPLS?

If you have questions about a person in the *EPLS,* ask the point of contact for the Federal agency that placed the person's name into the *EPLS.* You may find the agency point of contact from the *EPLS.*
[No. 25898-6-II.

Division Two.

December 13, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. David Dean Lowery, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Lewis County, No. 99-1-00783-7, H. John Hall, J., entered May 5, 2000. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J., concurred in by Quinn-Brintnall, A.C.J., and Morgan, J.
§ 68.5 Comprehensive medical examination. ( a ) Prior to the medical examination required by § 61.23(c)(3) of this chapter, an individual must— ( 1 ) Complete the individual's section of the checklist described in § 68.7; and
( 2 ) Provide the completed checklist to the State-licensed physician performing the medical examination.
( b ) The physician must— ( 1 ) Conduct the medical examination in accordance with the checklist set forth in § 68.7,
( 2 ) Check each item specified during the examination; and
( 3 ) Address, as medically appropriate, every medical condition listed and any medications the individual is taking.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 92 (Thursday, May 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11844]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Proposed Information Collection; Commander, Navy 
Recruiting Command

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Navy Recruiting Command announces a proposed 
extension of an approved public information collection and seeks public 
comment on the provisions thereof. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 
the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper 
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the 
information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; 
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the 
information collection on respondents, including through the use of 
automated collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by July 10, 
2000.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments and recommendations on the proposed 
information collection to Navy Recruiting Command (Code 80), 5722 
Integrity Drive, Millington, TN 38054-5057,

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request additional information or 
to obtain a copy of the proposal and associated collection instruments, 
contact Commander Howington at 901-874-9388.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Form Title and OMB Number: Navy Advertising Effectiveness Study; 
OMB Control Number 0703-0032.
    Needs and Uses: The Navy Advertising Effectiveness Study measures 
advertising effectiveness and provides data for strategies to be used 
in advertising. This information is used to determine management 
decisions on objectives and strategies of advertising, media selection, 
and the evaluation of the advertising and recruiting process.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Annual Burden Hours: 500.
    Number of Respondents: 1,000.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Average Burden per Response: 30 minutes.
    Frequency: Semi-annually.

    Authority:  44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)

    Dated: May 2, 2000.
J. L. Roth,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-11844 Filed 5-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 1615

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1615 appear at 73 FR 39866, July 11, 2008.

#### § 1615.149 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 1615.150, no qualified individual with disabilities shall, because the Commission's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by individuals with disabilities, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the Commission.
§ 1470.10 Forms for applying for grants. ( a ) *Scope.* ( 1 ) This section prescribes forms and instructions to be used by governmental organizations (except hospitals and institutions of higher education operated by a government) in applying for grants. This section is not applicable, however, to formula grant programs which do not require applicants to apply for funds on a project basis.
( 2 ) This section applies only to applications to Federal agencies for grants, and is not required to be applied by grantees in dealing with applicants for subgrants. However, grantees are encouraged to avoid more detailed or burdensome application requirements for subgrants.
( b ) *Authorized forms and instructions for governmental organizations.* ( 1 ) In applying for grants, applicants shall only use standard application forms or those prescribed by the granting agency with the approval of OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980.
( 2 ) Applicants are not required to submit more than the original and two copies of preapplications or applications.
( 3 ) Applicants must follow all applicable instructions that bear OMB clearance numbers. Federal agencies may specify and describe the programs, functions, or activities that will be used to plan, budget, and evaluate the work under a grant. Other supplementary instructions may be issued only with the approval of OMB to the extent required under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980. For any standard form, except the SF-424 facesheet, Federal agencies may shade out or instruct the applicant to disregard any line item that is not needed.
( 4 ) When a grantee applies for additional funding (such as a continuation or supplemental award) or amends a previously submitted application, only the affected pages need be submitted. Previously submitted pages with information that is still current need not be resubmitted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      28,440,625
<SECURITIES>                                11,359,993
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,243,795
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,176,422
<PP&E>                                       3,464,952
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,223,945
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,077,670
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,343,731
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        94,539
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,639,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,077,670
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,303,554
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,395,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,778,971
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,269
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,542,501)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (428,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,114,501)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,114,501)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,883
<SECURITIES>                                 8,303
<RECEIVABLES>                                  742
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (22)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,605
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,766
<PP&E>                                       8,263
<DEPRECIATION>                              (4,495)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,157
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                  8,201
<COMMON>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,290
<SALES>                                      3,609
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,585
<CGS>                                       (2,670)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               (2,670)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            (5,804)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (161)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,050)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,050)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                   (1,393)
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,443)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.72)


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

December 7, 2010

Before

DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

   

No. 07‐3806

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff‐Appellee,

v.

L.C. BELL,

Defendant‐Appellant.                 

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Central District of Illinois.

No. 07 CR 20027

Michael P. McCuskey,

Chief Judge.

O R D E R

L.C. Bell pled guilty to possession of more than five grams of cocaine base with

intent to distribute and possession of a firearm by a felon.  The district court sentenced Bell

to 150 months’ imprisonment and eight years of supervised release on the drug count, and

120 months’ imprisonment and three years of supervised release on the firearm count, to

run concurrently.  In United States v. Bell, 585 F.3d 1045 (7th Cir. 2009), we affirmed Bell’s

convictions but issued a limited remand to allow the district court to determine whether it

would have imposed a different sentence in light of Kimbrough v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 558

(2007).  On September 27, 2010, the district court advised us that it would have imposed the

same sentence even if it had known that it could take the crack/cocaine powder disparity

into account.  Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
### Regulatory Evaluation
Docket No. F AA- Directorate Identifier: 

# Dl **~** 

# -- Cf
- 01" 2'11- 0

. . -ft9. ( (n m 

### make

**J. !!.<'~**  

### tn lh e wlu es in th e whl e h e/o u . you IIIII\( 

### e ns ure th t! t o tal s upda 1e 

### acco rdin g l y. 

### ( f

**th~y** 

### do n o t. 

### di ck tor Tu hJ imo a wl !h en ou 1 

### of llze dwn ge d cell
. Estimated Costs: Action Cos ts per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, (e.g. , In spect ion , prope ller, appl i ance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Tot al Costs Number o f T otal Cost replacement) (i nclu d e cost ( l abor+ 

## u.s. f o r U . S. Fleet Do nut in clud e on c onditi o n c osts he re a cc e ss , t e s tin g, (@ $85/h parts ) Registe r ed a n

d close-up) our) Products Inspection 

### ( A 1) 0 . 1 9 , 000 Inspectio n 

### ( A2) 0.5 9 , 000 

# '

'

' Th e kn o wn number o f p r oducts i n compl i a n ce : Total Costs of c o mp l iance for U .S. fleet: $4 59. 0 0 0 Co s t s covered u n der warranty 

### ( if known ) 

## s On-Condition Costs:



## ~ A

c tion Wo r k

- h ours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product ( e. g . , In spection. ( include acce s s. (@ $85 /h our)

repl acem e nt) t es tin g, and cl oseup) 

### Rep lacement 0 .5 S I ,S I O 

### I Special considc1·ations for Econ o mi c Analysis (U s e 

### r h is jiel d 1 0 e : -.:pl a in an y thiii J{ 

### in th e E s 1

ima 1 ed Costs 

### r ub le rhar was 

### c 1 sswm : d or 

### m ight n or 

### be obvi o us Th i s jield can 

### a l su be us e d to 

### exp lai n war r a llf y cosrs): 

### 7

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD 

### be consi d ered a "si gnificant regu la tory action"?



# ~ YES* 

# 0 NO 

# IZI *Explanation: 

### DOT 

### Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? 

# G YES* 

# 0 NO!ZI *Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant ec onomic impact on a substantial number of s mall entities? Exp lain for either a Y es or No



# answe **~** YES 

# 0 NO 

# IZI Explanation : 

### Intrastate Av ia tion in Ala sl<a: This AD could affect intrastate aviat ion in Alaska. ls it app rop riate to include spe cific requi remen t s for a i rcraft operated in Alaska where a viation might be the on l y mode of transportation? 

# e YES * 

# 0 N0(8] *Explanation:



### 8