alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  I, Michael F. Holloran, certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Elgrande International, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to  the period covered by this quarterly report; and  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.  4.  The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting;  /s/ Michael F. Holloran --------------------------------------- Michael F. Holloran, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Date: April 11, 2007
Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Gary D. Woerz, CFO of American
International Industries Inc., a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following
certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with
respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007.

The undersigned certifies that the above
quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above report fairly presents, in
all respects, the financial condition of American International Industries Inc. and
results of its operations.

Date: May 14, 2007
Gary D. Woerz
CFO/s/ Gary D. Woerz
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: 

Dl ~ -- Cf- 01"2'11-0 .. -ft9. 

((nm make J.!!.<'~ tn lhe wlues in the whle he/ou . you IIIII\( ensure tht! totals upda1e accordingly. (f 

th~y do not. dick tor TuhJ imo awl !hen ou1 of llze dwnged cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) 

Do (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet nut include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Inspection (A 1) 0.1 9,000 

Inspection (A2) 0.5 9,000 

' 

' 

' 

The known number o f products in compliance : 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $459.000 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) s 

On-Condition Costs: ~ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection. (include access. (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

Replacement 0.5 SI,S IO 

I 

Special considc1·ations for Economic Analysis (Use rhisjield 10 e:-.:plain any thiiiJ{ in the Es1ima1ed Costs ruble 

rhar was c1sswm:d or might nor be obvious This jield can alsu be used to explain warrallfy cosrs): 

7 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? ~ 

YES* 0 NO IZI 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? G 

YES* 0 NO!ZI 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answe ~ 

YES 0 NO IZI 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Avia tion in Alasl<a: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. ls it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the on ly mode of transportation? e 

YES* 0 N0(8] 

*Explanation: 

8
#### STATE OF FLORIDA v PAZ

Case No. 90-085 AC

Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Dade County

May 17, 1991

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Angelica D. Zayas, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Kent Wheeler, Esquire, for appellee.

Before NADLER, FERRO, CAPUA, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

FERRO, J.

The State appeals from an order discharging the Defendant on his *Motion for Discharge*on the 30th day of October, 1989. We reverse.

*5The record below indicates that a bench warrant was issued as a result of the Defendant’s failure to appear for his arraignment on the 28th day of August, 1989. There is a second bench warrant issued on the 6th day of November, 1989, by the trial court below. Appellee’s counsel filed a *Motion to Set aside Bench Warrant*on the 13th day of November, 1989 (notwithstanding counsel’s certificate of service which indicates that counsel mailed the motion on the 8th of November, 1989).

Appellee counsel’s failure to immediately file the motion to set aside the bench warrant was the direct cause of the state’s inability to bring Mr. Paz to trial. The trial judge abused his discretion in failing to inquire as to the counsel’s failure to immediately take action to set aside the bench warrant.

The “gotcha” method of advocacy cannot be tolerated at any level in the judicial system. *State v Belien,*379 So.2d 446, 447 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

The failure of the appellant to twice appear in court (two bench warrants) together with the actions of defense counsel lead to the inescapable conclusion that the order of discharge should be reversed and the cause remanded for trial on the merits.

NADLER and CAPUA, JJ., Concur.

REVERSED.
#### § 1602.17 Commission's remedy for failure to file report.

Any person failing or refusing to file Report EEO-2 when required to do so may be compelled to file by order of a U.S. District Court, upon application of the Commission, under authority of section 709(c) of title VII.

[37 FR 9220, May 6, 1972]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Statement Nos. 33-54879, 33-48490,
33-48673, 33-52797, 33-52799, 33-61351, 33-28621, and 33-93023) and the
Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3
(Registration Statement No. 33-74665) of Kmart Corporation of our report dated
March 6, 2000 relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual
Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Detroit, Michigan
April 19, 2000
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.333-114650), Form S-8 (No. 333-110769), Form S-8 (No. 333-105524), Form S-8 (No. 333-101130), FormS-8 (No. 333-102650), Form S-8 (No. 333-80443), Form S-8 (No. 333-47392), Form S-8 (No. 333-72894),Form S-8 (333-75872), Form S-8 (No. 333-82006), and Form S-8 (No. 333-69123) of Torvec, Inc. of ourreport dated April 13, 2006 (with respect to Note H[11](c), April19, 2006) on our audit of the consolidated financial statements of Torvec, Inc.which is included in the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005./S/ EISNER LLPNew York, New York
# EUR-Lex - 31998R0539 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998R0539

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 539/98 of 9 March 1998 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3077/78 on the equivalence with Community certificates of attestations accompanying hops imported from non-member countries **

*
Official Journal L 070 , 10/03/1998 P. 0003 - 0005 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 539/98 of 9 March 1998 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3077/78 on the equivalence with Community certificates of attestations accompanying hops imported from non-member countries

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1696/71 of 26 July 1971 on the common organisation of the market in hops (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1554/97 (2), and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3077/78 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2132/95 (4), recognises the equivalence with Community certificates of attestations accompanying hops imported from certain non-member countries and adopts the list of agencies in those countries authorized to issue attestations of equivalence and of products covered; whereas, as a result of the information supplied by Poland, the Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 3077/78 should therefore be amended;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Hops,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 3077/78 is hereby replaced by the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 March 1998.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 175, 4. 8. 1971, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 208, 2. 8. 1997, p. 1.

(3) OJ L 367, 28. 12. 1978, p. 28.

(4) OJ L 214, 8. 9. 1995, p. 7.

ANNEX

ORGANIZATIONS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE ATTESTATIONS IN RESPECT OF >TABLE>

>

TABLE POSITION>
1

Jordan, Ronald

From: Jordan, Ronald

Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 3:56 PM

To: Jacklin, Mark J

Subject: Filter at Keystone

Hi Mark,

It was good talking with you earlier this afternoon.  I miss the good old days of site visits and sampling.  You folks at

Keystone were a pleasure to work with.

Thanks for checking on the polishing filters (sock filter) and confirming they’re rated for removing particulates 10 micron

and larger.

Regards,

Ron

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  

Ron Jordan

USEPA Office of Water

Engineering & Analysis Division  

Washington, DC

(202) 566‐1003
Exhibit 32.2

Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Gary D. Woerz, CFO and President
of American International Industries, Inc, a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the
following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
with respect to the following quarterly report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2005.

The undersigned certifies that the above
quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above quarterly report fairly
presents, in all respects, the financial condition of American International Industries,
Inc. and results of its operations.

Date: November 9, 2005
Gary D. Woerz
Chief Financial Officer and President/s/ Gary D. Woerz
#### Waits *v.*The State.

Crime.

(Decided January 9, 1917.

73 South. 765.)

Appeal and Error; Review; New Trial; Criminal Case. — Under Acts 1915, p. 722, the motion for a new trial in a criminal case should be shown by bill of exceptions, and cannot be intelligently considered in the absence of a bill of exceptions showing the evidence adduced upon the trial of the case in the court below.

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. Wm. E. Fort.

Walter Waits was convicted of a crime and he appeals.

Affirmed.

John P. Abbott, for appellant.

W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

PELHAM, P. J.

This appeal is on the record proper without a bill of exceptions. Under the act approved September 22, 1915 (Acts 1915, p. 722), the motion for a new trial which is set out in the transcript, and the decision of the court on the motion, should be shown by a bill of exceptions. No ruling of the trial court appears to have been made on this motion, so far as anything appears in the record before us, and the grounds of the motion could not be intelligently considered in the entire absence of the evidence adduced upon the trial of the case in the court below.

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-60126

Summary Calendar

BASILIO JIMENEZ-FURCAL, also known as Basilio Evaristo Jimenez Furcal,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A029 855 740

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Basilio Jimenez-Furcal, a native and citizen of the Dominican Republic,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), 

which dismissed his pro se appeal from the final order of removal issued by an

immigration judge. In dismissing the appeal, the BIA found that JimenezFurcal, through counsel, had waived his right to appeal; he had raised no 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 6, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-60126 Document: 00512994186 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/06/2015
No. 14-60126

specific argument challenging the validity of the waiver; and his appeal was 

thus not proper.

In this court, Jimenez-Furcal argues in a conclusory fashion (1) that the 

immigration judge and the BIA erred in failing to grant his motion to terminate 

his removal proceedings, which would have permitted him to resolve his 

citizenship claim in a federal district court, and (2) that his counsel rendered 

ineffective assistance by failing to pursue the motion to terminate as 

instructed. In support of these claims, Jimenez-Furcal has submitted two 

affidavits, which were not first presented to the BIA and thus may not be 

considered by this court. See Hernandez-Ortez v. Holder, 741 F.3d 644, 647 

(5th Cir. 2014).

Jimenez-Furcal has not addressed the BIA’s reasons for dismissing his 

appeal. He has thus abandoned any challenge to that decision. See Soadjede 

v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, his petition for 

review is DENIED.

2

 Case: 14-60126 Document: 00512994186 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/06/2015
§ 91.405 Maintenance required. Each owner or operator of an aircraft— ( a ) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter;
( b ) Shall ensure that maintenance personnel make appropriate entries in the aircraft maintenance records indicating the aircraft has been approved for return to service;
( c ) Shall have any inoperative instrument or item of equipment, permitted to be inoperative by § 91.213(d)(2) of this part, repaired, replaced, removed, or inspected at the next required inspection; and
( d ) When listed discrepancies include inoperative instruments or equipment, shall ensure that a placard has been installed as required by § 43.11 of this chapter.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Gregory T. Lucier, Chief Executive Officer of Invitrogen Corporation (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



(2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  |                                          
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Dated: July 29, 2005 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Gregory T. Lucier
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  | Gregory T. Lucier Chief Executive Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

March 23, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133413 & (15)(16) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

SHERMAN TOWNSHIP,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133413 

 COA: 276585 

St. Joseph CC: 03-001068-CZ

JOSEPH A. LEEMREIS AND 

LORI M. LEEMREIS,

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay of proceedings is DENIED. 

p0320 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 23, 2007 

Clerk
#### BROWN et v STATE ex MERLAND

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21539.

Decided April 17, 1929

Syllabus by

MARSHALL, CJ.

COUNTIES

(170 L) A county library established and maintained by levies of taxes upon all the property of a county is an institution of an educational character the benefits of which would be as applicable in any one county as in any other county.

A law authorizing the establishment, and maintenance of a county library is a‘ law of a general nature and should have uniform operation throughout the state.

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

(140 S) Sections 14993 to 15005 inclusive, Section 15060 and Sections 2434-1 to 2434-4 inclusive, General Code, are laws of a general nature but have local application only in the county of Hamilton in the State of Ohio. They are therefore violative of Section 26, Article II of the constitution, and void.

Kinkade, Robinson, Jones, Matthias, and Day, JJ, concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1
  Consent
    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
    (Form S-3 No. 333-81626, 333-85996, 333-118519, 333-120602, 333-122068, 333-131433)
  (Form S-4 No. 333-122069)
  (Form S-8 No. 333-67085, 333-79269, 333-36680, 333-47026, 333-53332, 333-69036, 333-101759, 333-105864, 333-130626)
 
  Form 10-K/A
 
  
   
  
 35
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 92 (Thursday, May 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11767]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: June 29, 2000.
    Time: 11:30 am to 1:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Executive Plaza South, Room 400C, 6120 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call.
    Contact Person: Melissa Stick, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, NIDCD/
NIH, 6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-8683.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 4, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-11767 Filed 5-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M