alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin
J. Himmelhaver, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Kevin J. Himmelhaver
----------------------------

Kevin J. Himmelhaver
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
  and Secretary
May 12, 2004
Exhibit 31



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Michael F. Holloran, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Elgrande.com, Inc.;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report  does not  contain any  untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to  the period covered by this quarterly report; and



3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present, in  all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows  of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.



4.  The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.  The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting;



/s/ Michael F. Holloran

---------------------------------------

Michael F. Holloran

Chief Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer



Date: October 20, 2004
#### WILLIAMS v. THE STATE.

(Decided December 19, 1916.)

Appeal from Tuscaloosa County Court.

Heard before Hon. H. B. Foster.

No counsel marked for appellant.

W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Dismissed for failure to file transcript in time.
§ 450.155 Readiness. ( a ) *General.* An operator must document and implement procedures to assess readiness to proceed with the flight of a launch or reentry vehicle. These procedures must address, at a minimum, the following: ( 1 ) Readiness of vehicle and launch, reentry, or landing site, including any contingency abort location;
( 2 ) Readiness of safety-critical personnel, systems, software, procedures, equipment, property, and services; and
( 3 ) Readiness to implement the mishap plan required by § 450.173.
( b ) *Application requirements.* An applicant must— ( 1 ) Demonstrate compliance with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section through procedures that may include a readiness meeting close in time to flight; and
( 2 ) Describe the criteria for establishing readiness to proceed with the flight of a launch or reentry vehicle so that public safety is maintained.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Daniel Dror,
CEO, President and Chairman of American International Industries, Inc., pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

I, Daniel Dror, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form
10-QSB of American International Industries, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, 
I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the undersigned by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as
of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report management's conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors:

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.  I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 9, 2005, 
Daniel Dror, CEO, 
President and Chairman/s/ Daniel Dror
#### § 1630.8 Relationship or association with an individual with a disability.

It is unlawful for a covered entity to exclude or deny equal jobs or benefits to, or otherwise discriminate against, a qualified individual because of the known disability of an individual with whom the qualified individual is known to have a family, business, social or other relationship or association.
**Exhibit 4.29**

 

# **PROMISSORY NOTE**

# ** **

| U.S. $75,000,000 |   | Louisville, Kentucky, December 19,  2005 |
|------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|

 

Kentucky Utilities Company (“KU”), for value received,hereby promises to pay to the order of FIDELIA Corporation (“FIDELIA”), inlawful money of the United States of America (in freely transferable U.S.dollars and in same day funds), in accordance with the method of paymentspecified in that certain KU Loan Agreement dated as of December 19, 2005,between FIDELIA and KU (“the Agreement”), the principal sum of $75,000,000,which amount shall be payable at such times as provided in the Agreement.

 

KUpromises also to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount hereof in likemoney and in like manner at the rates which shall be determined in accordancewith the provisions of the Agreement, said interest to be payable at the timeprovided for in the Agreement. This Note is referred to in the Agreement and isentitled to the benefits thereof and the security contemplated thereby. ThisNote evidences a loan made by FIDELIA, during such time as such loan is beingmaintained. This Note is subject to prepayment as specified in the Agreement. Incase KU defaults on the loan, the principal and accrued interest on this Note may bedeclared to be due and payable in the manner and with the effect provided inthe Agreement.

 

 KU hereby waives presentment, demand, protestor notice of any kind in connection with this Note.

 

ThisNote shall be governed and construed and interpreted in accordance with thelaws of the State of Delaware.

 
|   | Kentucky  Utilities Company |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   |                        |
|   |                        |
|   | By:                         | /s/ Daniel K.  Arbough |   |
|   |                        | Daniel K.  Arbough |
|   |                        | Director of  Corporate Finance & Treasurer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Greens Worldwide Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the six months ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I (We), Connie S. Ross, Former Chief Executive Officer, and Margaret M. Eardley, Former Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company./s/ Connie S. Ross______________ 
Connie S. Ross
Former Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2005



/s/ Margaret M. Eardley_________Margaret M. Eardley
Former Acting Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2005
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices 

# Order

February 3, 2015

147924

- 9(99)

CITY OF RIVERVIEW and ALL OTHERS

SIMILARLY SITUATED,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

and

CITY OF RIVER ROUGE,

Intervening Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 147924; 147927

COA: 301549; 302903

Ingham CC: 09

- 000712

- CZ

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY,

Defendant

- Appellee.

____________________________________/

CITY OF NOVI, VILLAGE OF BEVERLY

HILLS, CITY OF FARMINGTON HILL S,

CITY OF AUBURN HILLS, VILLAGE OF

BINGHAM FARMS, CITY OF ORCHARD

LAKE VILLAGE, and CITY OF WALLED

LAKE,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v SC: 147925; 147928

COA: 301551; 302904

Ingham CC: 09

- 001569

- CZ

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY,

Defendant

- Appellee.

____________________________________/

DAVID ANGILERI, BUTLER BENTON,

KENNETH BUTLER II, TOWNSHIP OF

BROWNSTOWN, CITY OF DEARBORN,

CITY OF DEARBORN HEIGHTS, CITY

OF GIBRALTAR, TOWNSHIP OF HURON,I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 3, 2015

p0126 2

Cler k TOWNSHIP OF SUMPTER, CITY OF

TAYLOR, CITY OF TRENTON, TOWNSHIP

OF VAN BUREN, ROBERT CANNON,

ROBERT CHIRKUN, CHARTER

TOWNSHIP OF CLINTON, LOUIS KISIC,

ALAN LAMBERT, CITY OF LINCOLN

PARK, CITY OF MADISON HEIGHTS,

CITY OF NEW BALTIMORE, CITY OF

NORTHVILLE, OAKLAND COUNTY,

CITY OF PLYMOUTH, CHARTER

TOWNSHIP OF REDFORD, CITY OF

ROCHESTER, CITY OF ROMULUS, CITY

OF ROSEVILLE, LISA SANTO, PHILIP

SANZICA, PAUL SINCOCK, CITY OF

SOUTHGATE, PATRICK SULLIVAN and

WAYNE COUNTY,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v SC: 147926; 147929

COA: 301552; 302905

Ingham CC: 10

- 000039

- CZ

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY,

Defendant

- Appellee.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September

17, 2014 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order

was entered erroneously.
#### MASEMANN v ATLANTIC COAST LINE RD CO

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9143.

Decided Mar 11, 1929

Payer, Minshall, Karch & Kerr, Cleveland, and Johnson, Johnson and Farber, Toledo, for Masemann.

Frank J Gentsch, Cleveland, for Rd Co.

Judges RICHARDS and WILLIAMS of the Sixth Dist sitting.

*246RICHARDS, J.

The Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company is a foreign corporation, organized under the laws of Virginia and operating a railroad -in Virginia, Florida and other states, but not in the state of Ohio. It had a representative in the State of Ohio located in the city of Cleveland named John J. Crescio, and the question involved in the motion to quash service of summons is whether he was a managing agent within the meaning of the Ohio statute on whom service could be made. The determination of that question depends upon the duties which he was to perform and the power which was vested in him as a representative of the company, and these were questions of fact to be determined by evidence. The motion to quash indicates that the facts will appear in certain affidavits, and the transcript of the docket entries shows that affidavits were filed by both parties. The Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company filed the affidavits of its' vice-president in charge of freight and passenger traffic, the affidavit of its general passenger agent and the affidavit of John J. Crescio. The plaintiff filed an affidavit and took a deposition. The only journal entry disposing of the motion to quash service of summons is the following:

> “The motion by defendant to quash service of summons is granted, to which plaintiff excepts.’.’

No motion for new trial was filed and no bill of exceptions taken. It is manifest from the record that the trial court heard and disposed of the motion to quash the service of summons on the evidence, and indeed it could only appear by evidence whether the person upon whom service was attempted to be made was or was not a managing agent within the. meaning, of the statute. This court is without power to review the decision of the court of common pleas in the absence of a bill of exceptions. The court, in the absence of a bill of exceptions, will presume that evidence was submitted to the trial court justifying the decision which it rendered granting the motion to quash the service of summons.

The fact that some or all of the affidavits are attached to the transcript of the journal entries is immaterial. None of the errors which are assigned or relied on could appear except by bill of exceptions.

For the reasons given the judgment will be affirmed.

Williams, J, concurs. Lloyd, J, not participating.
#### § 1400.735-61 Notice to and appeal of employee.

The Director of Administrative Management will prepare charges and institute proceedings, which in all cases will be in accordance with Civil Service procedures for disciplinary actions against status employees. Such proceedings will include notification to the employee of his appeal rights.
#### § 1903.21 State administration.

Nothing in this part 1903 shall preempt the authority of any State to conduct inspections, to initiate enforcement proceedings or otherwise to implement the applicable provisions of State law with respect to State occupational safety and health standards in accordance with agreements and plans under section 18 of the Act and parts 1901 and 1902 of this chapter.

[36 FR 17850, Sept. 4, 1971. Redesignated at 62 FR 15337, Mar. 31, 1997]
05/25/2011 15:11 FAX 2024935142 FAA + DMS 001/002 

U.S. DHPARTMFNT OF TRANS PORT ATION :J ^ j ^ 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION '^ ^* ^ K^ IL 

In the Matter of": 

CISCO AVIATION, LLC 

^ \ \ 

HEARING COCK^ 

FAA Case No. 2009SWI70I29 

FAA Docket CP No. CPl ISWOOOl 

Judge Richard C. Goodwin 

•-." 1 

RESPONDENT CISCO AVIATION, LLC*S 

WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL 

RESPONDENT Cisco Aviation, LLC pursuant to a settlement agreement with The 

Administrator made around May C, 2011 hereby withdraws its Appeal. 

Respectfully submitted, 

George E. Crow 

Texas State Bar No. 05151900 

Post Office Box 30 

Kaiy, Texas 77492-0030 

281-391-9275 

tJeortJeLrowC5).earthlink.net 

For Overnight Delivery u.se 

Physical Addres.s: 

1519 Miller Avenue 

Katy, TX 77493 

ATTORNEY IN CHARGE FOR 

RESPONDENlCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

1 ccrtily that a Lme copy of Respondent Cisco Aviation, LLC's Withdrawal of Appeal 

was served/filed on May 11, 2011 as follows: 

Cisco Aviaikm, LLC'^ Withdrawal of Ajjpca! 

Page 1 of 2 
05/25/201 1 15:1 1 FAX 2024935142 FAA ^ QMS @1002/002 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Pedcral Aviation Administration 

Wilbur Wright Buildmg, Suite 2W1 000 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

(1) Original (1) Copy 

Via CM/RRR 7102 3823 0521 5192 9266 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings. M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington. DC 20590 

(l)Copy 

Via Fax 202-366-7536 

Volanda Ayala Bemal 

Attorney, Safety Enforcement Branch 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E3 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Mcacham Blvd., Room 663 

I'Ort Worth, TX 76137 

(l)Copy 

Via I-ax: 817-222-5945 

Via E-Mail Yolanda.A.Bemalfg.faa.gov 

GEoTge E. Crow 

(ML^ 

Cisco Aviation, LLC's Wilhdrawal of Appeal 

Page 2 of 2
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S

N O

. P D

- 3 7 0

- 1 3

M I C H A E L J O S E P H S N O W D E N , A p p e l l a n t

v .

T H E S T A T E O F T E X A S

O N S T A T E ’ S P E T I T I O N F O R D I S C R E T I O N A R Y R E V I E W F R O M T H E F O U R T E E N T H C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

H A R R I S C O U N T Y

P e r c u r i a m .

O P I N I O N

A p p e l l a n t w a s c o n v i c t e d o f a g g r a v a t e d s e x u a l a s s a u l t o f a c h i l d a n d s e n t e n c e d t o l i f e

i n p r i s o n

. O n a p p e a l , h e a r g u e d t h a t t h e e v i d e n c e w a s i n s u f f i c i e n t t o s u p p o r t t h e $ 6 3 9 i n

c o u r t c o s t s a s s e s s e d a g a i n s t h i m i n t h e j u d g m e n t

. T h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s a g r e e d , r e l y i n g o n

i t s o w n o p i n i o n i n J

o h n s o n v

. S t a t e , 3 8 9 S

. W

. 3 d 5 1 3 ( T e x

. A p p

. – H o u s t o n [ 1 4 D i s t

. ] 2 0 1 2 )

. t hS N O W D E N

- 2

S n o w d e n v

. S t a t e , N o

. 1 4

- 1 2

- 0 0 5 8 6

- C R , 2 0 1 3 T e x

. A p p

. L E X I S 2 7 9 5 ( T e x

. A p p

. – H o u s t o n
[ 1 4 D i s t

. ] M a r c h 1 9 , 2 0 1 3 ) ( n o t d e s i g n a t e d f o r p u b l i c a t i o n )

. t h

T h e S t a t e h a s f

i l e d a p e t i t i o n f

o r d i s c r e t i o n a r y r e v i e w o f t h i s d e c i s i o n

. W e r e c e n t l y

h a n d e d d o w n o u r o p i n i o n i n J o h n s o n v

. S t a t e , N o

. P D

- 0 1 9 3

- 1 3 , 2 0 1 4 T e x

. C r i m

. A p p

.

L E X I S 2 4 0 ( T e x

. C r i m

. A p p

. F e b r u a r y 2 6 , 2 0 1 4 ) , i n w h i c h w e s e t f o r t h a r o a d m a p f

o r

r e s o l v i n g q u e s t i o n s r e g a r d i n g c o u r t c o s t s

. S e e a l s o C a r d e n a s v

. S t a t e , N o

. P D

- 0 7 3 3

- 1 3 , 2 0 1 4

T e x

. C r i m

. A p p

. L E X I S 2 3 6 ( T e x

. C r i m

. A p p

. F e b r u a r y 2 6 , 2 0 1 4 )

.

T h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s i n t h e i n s t a n t c a s e d i d n o t h a v e t h e b e n e f i t o f o u r o p i n i o n i n

J o h n s o n

. A c c o r d i n g l y , w e g r a n t t h e S t a t e ’ s p e t i t i o n f o r d i s c r e t i o n a r y r e v i e w , v a c a t e t h e
j u d g m e n t o f t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s , a n d r e m a n d t h i s c a s e t o t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s i n l i g h t o f

o u r o p i n i o n i n J

o h n s o n

. N o m o t i o n f

o r r e h e a r i n g w i l l b e e n t e r t a i n e d

.

D A T E D E L I V E R E D : A p r i l 1 6 , 2 0 1 4

D O N O T P U B L I S H
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 08-1203

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

JONATHAN POLAND,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA

The opinion of this Court, issued on April 2, 2009, should be

amended as follows:

On page 7, line 1 of footnote 2, replace "a number changes" with

"a number of changes".

On page 7, line 2 of footnote 2, replace "fo" with "of".
# EUR-Lex - 31998F0710(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998F0710(01)

**Council Act of 17 June 1998 drawing up the Convention on Driving Disqualifications **

*
Official Journal C 216 , 10/07/1998 P. 0001 - 0001 *

COUNCIL ACT of 17 June 1998 drawing up the Convention on Driving Disqualifications (98/C 216/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article K.3(2)(c) thereof,

Whereas, for the purposes of achieving the objectives of the Union, the Member States regard the giving of effect to driving disqualifications as a matter of common interest coming under the cooperation provided for in Title VI of the Treaty;

HAS DECIDED

that the Convention, the text of which is set out in the Annex and which is signed today by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the Union, is hereby drawn up;

RECOMMENDS that it be adopted by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional rules.

Done at Luxembourg, 17 June 1998.

For the Council

The President

M. MEACHER