alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[113th Congress Public Law 140]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 1746]]

Public Law 113-140
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 162 Northeast Avenue in Tallmadge, Ohio, as the ``Lance Corporal 
 Daniel Nathan Deyarmin, Jr., Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: July 25, 
                         2014 -  [H.R. 1813]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL DANIEL NATHAN DEYARMIN, JR., POST OFFICE 
                              BUILDING.

    (a) Redesignation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 162 Northeast Avenue in Tallmadge, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Lance Corporal Daniel Nathan Deyarmin, Jr., Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Daniel Nathan Deyarmin, Jr., Post Office Building''.

    Approved July 25, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1813:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            Mar. 24, considered and passed House.
            July 10, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### *Lewis S. Coryell *against*Thomas Croxall.

IN CASE.

Suit on note, *f^l^Jakation,*(a)

"'as duefan^ 0ff,

Plea and notice struck off. (b)

THE declaration, was upon a promissory note, for $250, drawn by defendant, in favour of *Claudius F. Le Grand,*or order; and by him endorsed to *Daniel Croxall;*by him, endorsed to the plaintiff; payable *without cation or discount.*

The defendant pleaded payment, by him, to *Le Grand;**880after the note became due; and before the assignment to plaintiff; and before any notice of the assignment; and before the commencement of this suit.

To this plea, is subjoined, a notice, that the said *Le Grand,*after the making of the note, and before the assignment to the plaintiff, and before the commencement of the suit, was indebted to the defendant, in $500, for goods, wares and merchandises, sold and delivered ; and for money lent and advanced to, and paid, laid out and expended, for the said *Le Grand;*and for money had and received by *Le Grand,*to and for the use of the defendant ; and for money due, from *Le Grand,*to defendant, for interest; and upon an account stated ; and that the said sum will be *set off,*against the sum mentioned in the said promissory note.,

*Ewing,*

moved to strike off the plea and notice, subjoined thereto; and read *Pat.*342.

*Wall*answered,

and referred to *Chit.*144.

(a)

**See *Tillou vs. Britton, 4 Hal. 120. Sanderson vs. Crane, 2 Gr. 506. Cumberland .Bank vs. Hann, 3 Har. 222. Laubach vs. Pursell, 6 Vr. 434. Little vs. Cooper, 3 Stock. 224. Duncan, Sherman & Co. vs. Gilbeni,, 5 Dutch. 521. Hamilton vs. Vought, 5 Vr. 187. Holcomb vs. Wyckoff, 6 Vr. 35.*Acts of 1871—13, and *Armour vs. McMichael, 7 Vr. 92. Youngs vs. Little, 3 Gr. 1.*

(b)

*Anonymous, 2 Hal. 160. Inhabitants, &c. vs. Booraem, 5 Hal. 257. Coxe vs. Higbee, 6 Hal, 395. Little vs. Bolles, 7 Hal. 171. Shotwell vs. Dennis, 2 Gr. 501. Allen vs. Wheeler, 1 Zab. 94. Hogencamp vs. Ackerman, 4 Zab. 133.*See *Stevenson vs. Schenck, Pen. *434.*

Court.

Let the plea and notice be struck off the files, and defendant plead in twenty days, or judgment by default.
1 

### Palma, Elizabeth

From: Palma, Elizabeth

Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 12:36 PM

To: Palma, Elizabeth

Subject: Public Exceptional Events Listening Session in Advance of Anticipated Rule Revisions -

Monday, August 26

Attachments: Listening Session Questions for Consideration_082013.docx

Thank you for registering for EPA's Exceptional Events Listening Session in Advance of Anticipated Rule Revisions

scheduled for Monday, August 26, 2013, from 2:00

‐ 4:00 PM eastern time on Conference line 866

‐ 299

‐ 3188 and

Conference Code 919

‐ 541

‐ 5265

. Because we have a limited number of phone lines available for our discussion, we ask

that participants in the same office share a phone line.

During the call, EPA will provide a brief overview of our anticipated schedule for Exceptional Events Rule revisions and

the development of guidance for wildfire

‐ related events that can affect ozone concentrations, but our primary objective

in hosting this discussion is for interested parties to provide feedback related to the attached questions and for the EPA

to consider your perspectives as we undertake revisions to the 2007 Exceptional Events Rule. We intend to present each

question and then call first upon those who have indicated their desire to provide feedback. We plan to follow this

process for each question.

The EPA does not plan to formally respond to comments received during this process. We are not seeking consensus nor

are we committing to include proposed rule elements based on the input we receive. We are hosting this listening

session by conference call to ensure we capture and understand any comments or concerns and make sure we do not

overlook key elements for rule revision.

As we move forward with a notice and comment rulemaking process, there will be an opportunity for all interested

parties, including those that commented during the 2012 public comment period, to raise any issues or concerns. EPA,

air agencies, and interested parties should use EPA’s Interim Exceptional Events Implementation Guidance, signed May

10, 2013, as we undertake rule revisions because it is consistent with the EER and the guidance already provided in the

preamble to the rule. This guidance is currently available on EPA's Exceptional Events website at

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/a nalysis/exevents.htm

.

We look forward to your participation during Monday’s discussion.

Beth W. Palma

USEPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

109 TW Alexander Drive (C539

‐ 04)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

palma.elizabeth@epa.gov

919.541.5432
#### § 1206.7 Construction of this part.

The rules and regulations in this part shall be liberally construed to effectuate the purposes and provisions of the act.

[12 FR 3083, May 10, 1947. Redesignated at 13 FR 8740, Dec. 30, 1948, and further redesignated at 77 FR 75549, Dec. 21, 2012. And further redesignated at 84 FR 35989, July 26, 2019]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4902 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.4902

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the United States courthouse located at 351 South West 
 Temple in Salt Lake City, Utah, as the ``Orrin G. Hatch United States 
                              Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ORRIN G. HATCH UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.
    (a) Designation.--The United States courthouse located at 351 South 
West Temple in Salt Lake City, Utah, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Orrin G. Hatch United States Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the United States 
courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``Orrin G. Hatch United States Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### NATIONAL BENEFIT LIFE INS CO v DAVIS, Admr.

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9999.

Decided May 13, 1929

John E. Roundtree, Esq., Cleveland, for Insurance Co.

Harry E. Davis, Esq., Cleveland, for Davis.

VICKERY, PJ.

Now the right of the plaintiff to maintain this action is based first upon the decision of our Supreme Court in the case of Filmore vs. The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 82 O. S. 208.

The question then arises whether this policy becomes uncollectible because the sole beneficiary being in a position where she cannot collect, is to indirectly have the benefit of any part- of this policy and the insurance. It might be that the policy had been carried for a great many years, and there have been a large amount of premiums paid on the policy and manifestly it would be wrong to permit the insurance company to avoid payment and keep the premiums as they had been paid, for we assume that there was no provision in this policy which makes it void upon the felonious killing by the beneficiary of the insured. It then must be a contract in force and it must be for the benefit of somebody. Manifestly it cannot be for the benefit of the insurance company. Its benefits came from its premiums and its liability to pay accrued upon the death of the insured, unless there be some reason why the policy became void.

Fortunately we are not left to conjecture unon this subject for' the question has been decided many times.

We quote the following from 25 Cyclopedia of Law and Procedure, P. 295.

(Here follows quotation)

*478This seems to be an authority exactly in point with the facts in the instant case, and in 37 Corpus Juris, P. 576, we find this.

(Here follows quotation)

In Cooley on “Insurance”, 2nd Edition, Volume 6, page 5229, the author says.

(Here follows quotation)

In Joyce on “Insurance”, Volume 2, page 1827, the author states.

(Here follows quotation)

From these authorities ,and probably many more are to be found, we must come to the conclusion that, although the named ben'eficiary cannot recover because of the felonious and wilful killing of the insured, yet the insurance is still recoverable, and it is then for the benefit of the estate, and in this case H. E. Davis was appointed administrator, and as such administrator brings this suit.

It is not right that the insurance company after receiving the premiums should be able to avoid responsibility upon the policy. It has got what it contracted for and it is only fair and right that the estate should get the results of the insurance policy; and that the person who caused the death of the husband incidentally gets something is no legal reason why the estate should not recover.

We have gone over this whole record and heard the arguments of counsel and satisfied ourselves that there is no error in this record that would warrant us in disturbing the finding of the court.

The judgment of the court will, therefore, be affirmed.

Sullivan and Levine, JJ, concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Lawrence  A.  Consalvi,  Chief  Executive  Officer of Gateway  International
Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C.  78m or 78o(d))  and that  information  contained  in this  Quarterly
Report on Form  10-QSB for the  fiscal  quarter  ended  March 31,  2005,  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of Gateway International Holdings, Inc.


By:    /s/ Lawrence A. Consalvi
       ------------------------
Name:  Lawrence A. Consalvi
Title: President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Date:  August 2, 2005
§ 5.51 Applicability. Any person required to have an SMS under this part must apply safety risk management to the following: ( a ) Implementation of new systems.
( b ) Revision of existing systems.
( c ) Development of operational procedures.
( d ) Identification of hazards or ineffective risk controls through the safety assurance processes in subpart D of this part.
[Doc. No. FAA-2009-0671, Amdt. 5-1, 80 FR 1326, Jan. 8, 2015, as amended by Amdt. 5-2, 89 FR 33107, Apr. 26, 2024]
#### § 93.311 Minimum terrain clearance.

Except in an emergency, when necessary for takeoff or landing, or unless otherwise authorized by the responsible Flight Standards Office for a purpose listed in § 93.309(c), no person may operate an aircraft within 500 feet of any terrain or structure located between the north and south rims of the Grand Canyon.

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0851, Amdt. 93-102, 83 FR 48212, Sept. 24, 2018]
#### § 1471.600 How do suspension and debarment actions start?

When we receive information from any source concerning a cause for suspension or debarment, we will promptly report and investigate it. We refer the question of whether to suspend or debar you to our suspending or debarring official for consideration, if appropriate.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 26833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11669]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 8:30 a.m. on 
Wednesday, May 10, 2000, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's 
Board of Directors will meet in closed session, pursuant to sections 
552b(c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10) of 
title 5, United States Code, to consider matters relating to the 
Corporation's corporate, resolution, and supervisory activities.
    The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of 
the FDIC Building located at 550--17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.
    Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be 
directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the 
Corporation, at (202) 898-6757.

    Dated: May 5, 2000.
    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11669 Filed 5-5-00; 1:20 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 20 10

- NM

- 251

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
U.S. Department of Energy

Manufactured Housing Working Group

September 22

- 23 , 2014

Summary

**Day 1: September 22 , 2014** 

 Assembly, Logistics and Introductions of attendees.

 Emanuel Levy, Systems Building Research Alliance presented

cost data

 DOE (Navigant) presented LCC with Updated Cost Data and

Annual Energy Runs Presentation with consensus being

reached on a majority of the items reviewed

.

 Comments from the Public

 Wrap Up and Next Steps

**Day 2: September 23 , 2014** 

 Assembly, Logistics and Introductions of attendees.

 Cont. DOE (Navigant) presented LCC with Updated Cost

Data and Annual Energy Runs Presentation with consensus

being reached on a majority of the report.

 Continuation of Subcommittee reports with parties

clea ning up more of th e 2015 IECC mandatory components

 Review Road Map for additional action items and

adjustments

 Floor was opened for public c omment

.

 Group discussed next steps, r eview ed the schedule and

concluding c omments

.

Next Dates:

**DATE Location**  **Room Webinar Link** 

October 1, 2014 DOE Forrestal GH

- 019 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/585091001

October 2, 2014 DOE Forrestal GH

- 019 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/726540504
§ 15.107 What must be provided in the administrative report? ( a ) The administrative report shall be in the form of a single memorandum in narrative form with attachments. It should contain all of the following elements, unless permission is obtained from the Office of the Solicitor to dispense with a particular element: ( 1 ) A brief explanation of the organization and operation of the program involved including statutory authority and applicable regulations;
( 2 ) A complete description of the events that gave rise to the claim or litigation, including a specific response to every allegation in the claim or litigation;
( 3 ) Any information available regarding the questions of whether the claimant or plaintiff actually suffered the harm alleged in the claim or litigation and what individual or organization caused any harm which appears to have occurred;
( 4 ) Any information available regarding the damages claimed;
( 5 ) Any policy reasons which the organizational unit wishes to advance for or against settlement of the claim or litigation; and
( 6 ) Details of any claims the Department may have against the claimant or plaintiff, whether or not they appear to be related to the subject matter of the claim or litigation.
( b ) A copy of all documents relevant to the issues involved in the claim or litigation should be attached to each copy of the Administrative Report. Original records should not be forwarded to the Office of the Solicitor unless specifically requested. They should be preserved, however, and remain available for litigation if necessary.
( c ) Organizational units should ensure that all Administrative Reports are either prepared or reviewed by an official of the organizational unit who was not personally involved in the incident in question prior to filing of the claim or suit.
( d ) The Office of the Solicitor may waive the requirement of an Administrative Report. If the Administrative Report is waived, the organizational unit or units involved in the circumstances of the claim or litigation shall provide certification from the supervisor of the employee whose alleged negligent act or omission gave rise to the claim, certifying that the employee was acting within the scope of his or her employment at the time of the alleged negligent act or omission.
§ 389.11 Available services and resources. Upon request and payment of fees as provided in this part, there are available, with respect to documents subject to inspection, services as follows: ( a ) Locating and copying records and documents;
( b ) Certification of copies of documents under seal of the Department; and
( c ) Transcripts of hearings and proceedings.
#### § 1471.130 Does exclusion under the Federal procurement system affect a person's eligibility to participate in nonprocurement transactions?

If any Federal agency excludes a person under the FAR on or after August 25, 1995, the excluded person is also ineligible to participate in nonprocurement covered transactions under this part. Therefore, an exclusion under the FAR has reciprocal effect in Federal nonprocurement transactions.
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

180) ll-E-140 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:09 AM Sheet 180 of 264 
04/03/98 

03/30/98 

15:05 

17:08 

©2283745278 

©19199410234 

ERSHIGS-BILOXI A <w C? 

P.2 

©001 

@002/002 

From: 

Contact Report 

Robert Jemison, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

Date: 

Contact: 

Company: 

March 30,1998 

Mr. Paul C.Brown 

Ershigs, Inc. 

Telephone Number (228)374-1774 

Fax Number: (228) 374-5278 

Contact Summary: 

Mr. Paul C. Brown was contacted on behalf of the U.S. EPA to update information provided 

in the 1993 EPA Reinforced Plastic Composites Screening Survey submitted by Ershigs, Inc. for 

their facility located in Biloxi, Mississippi. In response to my questions Mr. Brown indicated the 

following: 

The faciliry was purchased by Ershigs, Inc. from GL&V LaValley Industries, Inc. 

The facility produces fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) products for various corrosion 

resistant applications. These products include tower & vat linings, tanks, pipes, and fittings. The 

facility's products are primarily used by the pulp & paper, chemical processing, petrochemical, and 

utility industries. 

The facility uses hand lay-up (bucket & bnisb/hon-pressure-fed roller) to apply vinyl ester 

resins in the fabrication of certain corrosion resistant products. The vinyl ester resins applied by 

hand lay-up contain approximately 42% HAP by weight (on average). 

The facility uses spray lay-up to apply vinyl ester resins in the fabrication of certain corrosion 

resistant products. The vinyl ester resins applied by spray lay-up contain approximately 42% HAP 

by weight (on average). 

The facility uses the filament winding process to apply vinyl ester resins in the fabrication 

of certain corrosion resistant products. The vinyl ester resins applied using the filament winding 

process contain approximately 42% HAP by weight (on average). 

The facility uses spray lay-up to apply pigmented polyester gel coats. The polyester gel coats 

applied by spray lay-up contain approximaiely 35% HAP (on average). The only HAP present in 

the gel coats is styrene (none of the gel coats contain methyl methacrylate). 

The only HAP initially present in any of the vinyl ester resins used by the facility is styrene. 

In certain instances, small amounts of HAP (styrene) may be added to the resins. These small 

amounts are reflected in the HAP content values given above. None of the vinyl ester resins used 

by the faciliry contain vapor suppressants. The information pertaining to the HAP content of the 

resins applied using each fabrication process is based on 1997 production data. 

All of the resin mixing conducted at this facility is done inside 55 gallon drums. The facility 

does not use active (forced) ventilatioixduring any of its mixing operations. 

INFORMATION IS ACCURAl NC^-t*
EXHIBIT
15.1








Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-163385) of Ultrapetrol (Bahamas) Limited and in the
related Prospectus of our reports dated March 30, 2010, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Ultrapetrol (Bahamas) Limited, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Ultrapetrol
(Bahamas) Limited, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended
December 31, 2009.








Buenos
Aires, Argentina


March 30,
2010











PISTRELLI,
HENRY MARTIN Y ASOCIADOS S.R.L.


Member of
Ernst & Young Global





/s/ Ezequiel A.
Calciati


EZEQUIEL
A. CALCIATI


Partner