alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                    Ending
Class            Interest             Principal    Losses           Balance
<S>               <C>                  <C>            <C>           <C>
A1               1384283.76       9706416.64                0        37293583.36
A2               1138954.98                0                0           36100000
A3                547399.98                0                0           17000000
A4                484219.98                0                0           14200000
A5                407035.02                0                0           12700000
A6               2144049.73       5839022.51                0        67160977.49
OC                        0                0                0         3614868.88
R                      0.02                0                0                  0


</TABLE>
#### § 102.120 Post-employment restrictions on activities by former officers and employees.

Former officers and employees of the Agency who were attached to any of its Regional Offices or the Washington staff are subject to the applicable post-employment restrictions imposed by 18 U.S.C. 207. Guidance concerning those restrictions may be obtained from the Designated Agency Ethics Officer and any applicable regulations issued by the Office of Government Ethics.

[82 FR 11768, Feb. 24, 2017]
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-1800

___________ Dexter Lee Nash, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. - Cobbs, Mrs., Parole Officer, East * Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Greg * [UNPUBLISHED] Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas * Regional Unit, ADC; Wheatly, Mrs., * Assistant Warden, East Arkansas * Regional Unit, ADC; Outlaw, * Assistant Warden, East Arkansas * Regional Unit, ADC; Winfrey, Mr., * Parole Officer, East Arkansas Regional * Unit, ADC, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: October 12, 2009 Filed: November 4, 2009

___________ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable Brian S. M iller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- Dexter Lee Nash appeal s the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Cooper v. Schriro , 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that dismissal was proper because Nash failed to state a sec tion 1983 claim. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-0934

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM260AD

ALS PART 1, R5 --- 7/29/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
# EUR-Lex - 31998R0845 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998R0845

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 845/98 of 22 April 1998 fixing, for the purposes of Regulation (EC) No 411/97, the ceiling for Community financial assistance granted to producer organisations setting up operational funds for 1997 **

*
Official Journal L 120 , 23/04/1998 P. 0012 - 0012 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 845/98 of 22 April 1998 fixing, for the purposes of Regulation (EC) No 411/97, the ceiling for Community financial assistance granted to producer organisations setting up operational funds for 1997

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 411/97 of 3 March 1997 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 as regards operational programmes, operational funds and Community financial assistance (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 214/98 (2), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas Article 15(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 (3), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2520/97 (4), provides for the granting of Community financial assistance to producer organisations setting up operational funds; whereas paragraph 5 of that Article provides that up to 1999, that financial assistance is to be capped at 4 % of the value of the marketed production of each producer organisation, provided that the total financial assistance represents less than 2 % of the total turnover of all producer organisations; whereas, as from 1999, that 4 % will be increased to 4,5 % and the percentage of the total turnover will rise from 2 % to 2,5 %;

Whereas, according to information forwarded to the Commission by the Member States pursuant to Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 411/97, the financial assistance applied for in respect of 1997 by producer organisations amounts to ECU 199,20 million against a total turnover of all producer organisations of ECU 10 921 million; whereas the ceiling for the abovementioned Community financial assistance should therefore be set at 4 % of the value of marketed production of each producer organisation,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Community financial assistance provided for in Article 15(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 shall be capped at 4 % of the value of marketed production of each producer organisation for aid applications in respect of 1997.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 April 1998.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 62, 4. 3. 1997, p. 9.

(2) OJ L 214, 29. 1. 1998, p. 10.

(3) OJ L 297, 21. 11. 1996, p. 1.

(4) OJ L 346, 17. 12. 1997, p. 41.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Today�s FBI : facts &figures.**
 
2008-09 | 2010-11| 2013-14
 
SuDoc Number:J 1.14/36:
Item Number:0721-A-19 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000887842
 
January 26, 2018
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- {)_b}~ ~J; ~ ~ Directorate Identifier: 

Estimated Costs: 

Costs per Product (e.g. , aircraft, engine, 

Action propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost (e.g., Inspection, (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet replacement) access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Replacement 2.0 $25,000 300 

The known number of products in campi iance: 300 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $7,551 ,000 

Costs covered under warranty $0 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a " significant regulatory action" ? ~ 

YES* D NO [g) 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? 

YES* D NO [g) 

*Explanation: 
.. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. ~ 

YESO NO~ 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

' 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftranspmtation? ~ 

YES* 0 NO~ 

*Explanation:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4921 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4921

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 
 traveling expenses for Federal disaster relief workers away from home 
                         for more than 1 year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 18, 2020

Ms. Hassan (for herself and Mr. Hawley) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 
 traveling expenses for Federal disaster relief workers away from home 
                         for more than 1 year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TO ALLOW A DEDUCTION FOR TRAVELING EXPENSES FOR FEDERAL 
              DISASTER RELIEF WORKERS AWAY FROM HOME FOR MORE THAN 1 
              YEAR.

    (a) In General.--Section 162(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by inserting ``or is certified by the Administrator of 
the Federal Emergency Management Agency as traveling on behalf of the 
United States in temporary duty status to respond to a federally 
declared disaster (as defined in section 165(i)(5)(A))'' after ``a 
Federal crime''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1612.8 Public announcement of changes in meetings. ( a ) The agency is required to make a public announcement of any changes in its meeting or portion(s) thereof. If, after the announcement provided for in § 1612.7, the time or place of a meeting is changed or the meeting is cancelled, the agency will announce the change at the earliest practicable time. The subject matter or the determination to open or close the meeting may be changed only if ( 1 ) a majority of the entire membership of the agency determines by recorded vote that agency business so requires and that no earlier announcement of the change was possible and
( 2 ) the agency publicly announces the change and the vote of each member upon such change at the earliest practicable time.
( b ) Immediately following any public announcement of any change accomplished under the provisions of this section, the agency shall submit a notice for publication in the Federal Register disclosing: ( 1 ) The time of the meeting.
( 2 ) The place of the meeting.
( 3 ) The subject matter of each portion of each meeting or series of meetings.
( 4 ) Whether any portion(s) of a meeting is open or closed to public observation.
( 5 ) Any change in paragraphs (b) (1), (2), (3), or (4) of this section.
( 6 ) The name and telephone number of the official designated to respond to requests for information about any meeting.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1615

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1615 appear at 73 FR 39866, July 11, 2008.

#### §§ 1615.131-1615.134 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission of Fine Arts

The next meeting of the Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for May 18, 2000, at 10 am in the Commission's offices at the National Building Museum (Pension Building), Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 441 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion will include designs for projects affecting the appearance of Washington, DC,  including buildings and parks. 

Inquires regarding the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be addressed to Charles H. Atherton, Secretary, Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address or call 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date. 

Dated in Washington, DC, April 30, 2000.

Charles H. Atherton, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-12194  Filed 5-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
§ 1206.2 Percentage of valid authorizations required to determine existence of a representation dispute. ( a ) Upon receipt of an application requesting that an organization or individual be certified as the representative of any craft or class of employees, or to decertify the current representative and have no representative, a showing of proved authorizations (checked and verified as to date, signature, and employment status) from at least fifty (50) percent of the craft or class must be made before the National Mediation Board will authorize an election or otherwise determine the representation desires of the employees under the provisions of section 2, Ninth, of the Railway Labor Act.
( b ) Any intervening individual or organization must also produce proved authorizations (checked and verified as to date, signature, and employment status) from at least fifty (50) percent of the craft or class of employees involved to warrant placing the name of the intervenor on the ballot.
[77 FR 75549, Dec. 21, 2012, as amended at 84 FR 35989, July 26, 2019]
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-1167 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-058-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Exhibit 32

  Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer (CEO) and the Principal
Financial Officer (Chief Operating Officer) of Millenia Hope Inc. (the
"Company"), each hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

        (a)     The Annual Report on Form 10-K SB of the Company for the year
                ended November 30, 2006, filed on the date hereof with the
                Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies
                with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (b)     Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


Date: April 12, 2007



                                                /s/ Leonard Stella
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Leonard Stella
                                                Chief Executive Officer


Date: April 12, 2007



                                                /s/ Hugo Valente
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Hugo Valente
                                                Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certificationof Principal Executive OfficerRequired by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)of the Exchange Act**

        Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Advanstar Communications Inc.(the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JosephLoggia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of my knowledge:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| By:         |   | /s/ Joseph  Loggia      |   |
|-------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|        |   | Joseph Loggia           |
|        |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|        |   |                    |
|  Date: |   | April 2, 2007           |

 

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 18




May 15, 2002

Board of Directors
Kmart Corporation
3100 W. Big Beaver Road
Troy, Michigan  48084

Dear Directors:

We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form
10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have audited the consolidated financial statements included in Kmart's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 30, 2002 and issued our report
thereon dated May 15, 2002. Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements
describes a change in accounting principle from Kmart's interim financial
reporting policy reflecting use of an annualized gross margin through estimating
vendor allowances and rebates to be received during the fiscal year and
recording those amounts ratably throughout the year, to a method requiring that
cost recoveries from vendor allowances and rebates be recognized only when a
formal agreement has been obtained and the underlying activity for which the
amount was provided has been performed. It should be understood that the
preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another for interim
recognition of vendor allowances and rebates has not been addressed in any
authoritative accounting literature, and in expressing our concurrence below we
have relied on management's determination that this change in accounting
principle is preferable. Based on our reading of management's stated reasons and
justification for this change in accounting principle in the Form 10-K, and our
discussions with management as to their judgment about the relevant business
planning factors relating to the change, we concur with management that such
change represents, in Kmart's circumstances, the adoption of a preferable
accounting principle in conformity with Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 20.


Very truly yours,



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Detroit, Michigan
#### § 1641.7 Review of this part.

This part shall be reviewed by the Chairman of the EEOC and the Director of OFCCP periodically, and as appropriate, to determine whether changes to the part are necessary or desirable, and whether the part should remain in effect.