alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
( .9 ~~'-\.: ~ S'V'~f~--" f' if'o...- )c.l{.:: '-' --v.q__.{;u ~ 5e v-v\-CC. 

April3, 2013 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

ChieL Essential Air Service Division 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Docket OST -2008-0299 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

Mayor ami 

Councill'vlembers 

Sedalia Sanders 

Benjamin James Solomon III 

Cheryl Viegas-Walker 

Efrain Silva 

.Jason .Jackson 

This letter is to confirm support the request of SeaPort Airlines to operate an 

altemative service pattern at Imperial County Airport. Specifically. we support 

changing from the 29 weekly roundtrips to San Diego as awarded by the Department 

ofTransportation in Order 2013-1-2to a service pattern that includes 12 weekly 

roundtrips to Burbank and 12 weekly roundtrips to San Diego. 

We believe the alternative service pattern outlined about better meets the needs of our 

community, ofiering connectivity via San Diego. access to the Los Angeles area via 

Burbank, and convenient connections to/fron1 Sacramento via Burbank. 

For the stated reasons, we would greatly appreciate your office expediting the 

approval of SeaPo11 Airlines' request so that it may implement the alternative service 

pattern effective May 1, 2013. 

Sincerely, 

~~ B~inJ. Mayor 

El Centro City Hall 

1275 Main Street, El Centro, CA 92243 (760) 337-4540 Fax (760) 352-6177
§ 1471.450 What action may I take if a primary tier participant fails to disclose the information required under § 1471.335? If you as an agency official determine that a participant failed to disclose information, as required by § 1471.335, at the time it entered into a covered transaction with you, you may— ( a ) Terminate the transaction for material failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the transaction; or
( b ) Pursue any other available remedies, including suspension and debarment.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 93 (Friday, May 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11927]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-1831-000, et al.]


CinCap VII, LLC and CinCap VIII, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 8, 2000.
    CinCap VII, LLC (CinCap VII) and CinCap VIII, LLC (CinCap VIII) 
submitted for filing rate schedules under which CinCap VII and CinCap 
VIII will engage in wholesale electric power and energy transactions as 
a marketer. CinCap VII and CinCap VIII also requested waiver of various 
Commission regulations. In particular, CinCap VII and CinCap VIII 
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 
34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability 
by CinCap VII and CinCap VIII.
    On May 4, 2000, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by CinCap VII or Cincap VIII should file a 
motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, CinCap VII and 
CinCap VIII are authorized to issue securities and assume obligations 
or liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in 
respect of any security of another person; provided that such issuance 
or assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes 
of the applicants, and compatible with the public interest, and is 
reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of CinCap VII's or CinCap VIII's issuances of 
securities or assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is June 5, 2000.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11927 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4729 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4729

    To extend the Generalized System of Preferences, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2020

 Mr. Grassley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the Generalized System of Preferences, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF PREFERENCES.

    Section 505 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2465) is amended by 
striking ``December 31, 2020'' and inserting ``April 30, 2022''.

SEC. 2. CUSTOMS USER FEES.

    (a) In General.--Section 13031(j)(3) of the Consolidated Omnibus 
Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(j)(3)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``September 30, 2029'' 
        and inserting ``November 18, 2029''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking ``September 30, 
        2029'' and inserting ``November 18, 2029''.
    (b) Rate for Merchandise Processing Fees.--Section 503 of the 
United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (Public Law 
112-41; 19 U.S.C. 3805 note) is amended by striking ``September 30, 
2029'' and inserting ``November 18, 2029''.
                                 <all>
```
exv10w1w8







Exhibit 10.1.8




October 30, 2009




Ronald R. Dilling

Vice President, Manufacturing Operations

SeraCare Life Sciences, Inc.

37 Birch Street

Milford, MA 01757




          Re: Modification of Award




Dear Mr. Dilling:



This letter will confirm your agreement with and acknowledgment of the following:



You hereby consent to the modification of the Award Opportunity provided to you under the SeraCare
Life Sciences, Inc. Management Incentive Plan effective as of October 1, 2007 (the “Plan”)
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009 such that the Award Payment shall be payable one-half
in cash and one-half in shares of common stock of SeraCare Life Sciences, Inc. (the
“Company”) on the criteria previously set by the Board of Directors of the Company. The
number of shares of the Company’s common stock that will be granted to you will equal one-half of
the Award Payment divided by the closing price per share of the Company’s common stock on the date
of grant of such shares (the “Share Grant Date”). The resulting share total shall be
rounded down to the nearest whole share and any fractional amount shall be payable in cash. These
shares shall be granted pursuant to the Company’s 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. Notwithstanding any
of the foregoing, the Company may in its discretion pay cash (in lieu of shares) equal to the
actual fair market value of any portion or all of such shares on the Share Grant Date.



For the avoidance of doubt, the Company may withhold from cash amounts otherwise payable to you,
including up to the entire amount of the cash portion of the Award Payment, such amounts as the
Company determines in its discretion may be required to be withheld for tax purposes with respect
to the Award Payment (including both the cash and the stock portions thereof). All capitalized
terms above which are not defined herein are as defined in the Plan.



 









 





Please indicate your agreement to the terms of this letter by countersigning this letter in the
space provided below and returning your original signed letter to the Company.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Very truly yours,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	SeraCare Life Sciences, Inc.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:

Name:
	 	/s/ Susan L.N. Vogt
 

Susan L.N. Vogt
	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	President and Chief Executive Officer	 	 






Accepted and agreed to under seal this 30th day of October, 2009




	 	 	 
	/s/ Ronald R. Dilling
 

Ronald R. Dilling
§ 1601.18 Dismissal: Procedure and authority. ( a ) Where a charge on its face, or as amplified by the statements of the person claiming to be aggrieved discloses, or where after investigation the Commission determines, that the charge and every portion thereof is not timely filed, or otherwise fails to state a claim under title VII, the ADA, GINA, or the PWFA, the Commission shall dismiss the charge. A charge which raises a claim exclusively under section 717 of title VII or the Rehabilitation Act shall not be taken and persons seeking to raise such claims shall be referred to the appropriate Federal agency.
( b ) Written notice of disposition, pursuant to this section, shall be issued to the person claiming to be aggrieved and to the person making the charge on behalf of such person, where applicable; in the case of a Commissioner charge, to all persons specified in § 1601.28(b)(3)(ii); and to the respondent. The dismissal shall include a notice of rights informing the person claiming to be aggrieved or the person on whose behalf a charge was filed of the right to sue in Federal district court within 90 days of receipt of the determination. Appropriate notices of right to sue shall be issued pursuant to § 1601.28.
( c ) The Commission hereby delegates authority to District Directors; the Director of the Office of Field Programs, or upon delegation, the Director of Field Management Programs, as appropriate, to dismiss charges, as limited by § 1601.21(d). The Commission hereby delegates authority to Field Directors, Area Directors and Local Directors, or their designees, to dismiss charges pursuant to paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of this section, as limited by § 1601.21(d). The authority of the Commission to reconsider decisions and determinations as set forth in § 1601.21 (b) and (d) shall be applicable to this section.
[42 FR 55388, Oct. 14, 1977, as amended at 48 FR 19165, Apr. 28, 1983; 49 FR 13024, Apr. 2, 1984. Redesignated and amended at 52 FR 26957, July 17, 1987; 54 FR 32061, Aug. 4, 1989; 55 FR 26684, June 29, 1990; 56 FR 9624, 9625, Mar. 7, 1991; 71 FR 26828, May 9, 2006; 73 FR 3388, Jan. 18, 2008; 74 FR 63982, Dec. 7, 2009; 85 FR 65218, Oct. 15, 2020; 89 FR 11169, Feb. 14, 2024]
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Heartland Bancshares, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, James C. Clinard, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Martha J. Kelley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|By: |  |                                      
|    |  | /s/ James C. Clinard                 
|    |  | James C. Clinard                     
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | November 12, 2004                    
|    | 
|    |  | /s/ Martha J. Kelley                 
|    |  | Martha J. Kelley                     
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|    |  | November 12, 2004
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Centracan Incorporated, a Florida
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Jerome Goubeaux, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company, and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/ Jerome GoubeauxJerome
      GoubeauxChief
      Executive OfficerAugust
      13, 2009
8

15

24
24
24
24
ADEQ 

A R K A N S A S 

Department of Environmental Quality 

March 20, 2013 

Mr. Ron Curry 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA Region 6 

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 

Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 

Dear Mr. Curry: 

RECEIVED- 6PDL 

-'IR PLAtniiNG SEC. 

13 H~R 28 PH 5: 0·1 

On September 16,2009, the State of Arkansas submitted a letter certifying that the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) fully complies with the requirements of Clean Air Act (CAA) 

sections II O(a)(l) and (2) for the 2006 24-hour fine particulate (PM2 5) national ambient air 

quality standards. This certification includes Arkansas's analysis for the interstate transport 

requirements of CAA section II O(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) requiring that sources within a state do not 

significantly contribute to the interstate transport of pollutants that impact nonattainment in, or 

interfere with maintenance by, any other state with respect to the 2006 PM2.5 National Ambient 

Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). 

Because the more recent and improved air quality modeling data evaluating interstate transport 

for the 2006 PM2 5 NAAQS conducted by EPA for the Cross State Air Pollution Rule is now 

available and supports the conclusion that emissions in Arkansas do not significantly contribute 

to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS in any other state, we 

submit it as the basis for our conclusions in lieu of the previous technical information provided. 

We understand that the Cross State Air Pollution Rule has been vacated by the court but the 

technical analysis regarding transport from Arkansas is still relevant and valid. 

If you have any questions concerning this technical supplement to the September 16,2009, 

certification, please contact me or Air Division Chief Mike Bates at (50!) 682-0750 or 

bates@adeg.state.ar.us. Thank you for your consideration of this supplemental information. 

Sincerely, 

Teresa Marks, Director 

ADEQ 

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

5301 NORTHSHORE DRIVE I NORTH UTILE ROCK I ARKANSAS 72118-5317 /TELEPHONE 501-682-0744 I FAX 501-682-0880 

www.adeq .state.ar.us
(Logo)

                               AMERIQEST MORTGAGE


March 12, 1999

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1998,  Ameriquest Mortgage Company has
complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of America's  Uniform  Single  Attestation
Program for Mortgage  Bankers.  From January 1, 1998 through  December 31, 1998,
Ameriquest  Mortgage  Company  had in effect a  fidelity  bond in the  amount of
$10,000,000 and for the same period, an errors and omissions policy in an amount
between $6,200,000 and $6,425,000.

James R. Brazil
President

Elaine Stangl
Executive Vice President, Loan Servicing

John P. Grazer
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer

1100  Town & Country Road. Suite 1100. Orange. CA,  92868-4642o  (714) 564-0600
§ 1614.104 Agency processing. ( a ) Each agency subject to this part shall adopt procedures for processing individual and class complaints of discrimination that include the provisions contained in §§ 1614.105 through 1614.110 and in § 1614.204, and that are consistent with all other applicable provisions of this part and the instructions for complaint processing contained in the Commission's Management Directives.
( b ) The Commission shall periodically review agency resources and procedures to ensure that an agency makes reasonable efforts to resolve complaints informally, to process complaints in a timely manner, to develop adequate factual records, to issue decisions that are consistent with acceptable legal standards, to explain the reasons for its decisions, and to give complainants adequate and timely notice of their rights.
#### ERNEST v WEIGANDT

Ohio Appeals, 3rd Dist, Hancock Co

No 256.

Decided Feb 20, 1929

W. S. Snook, Findlay, for Ernest.

*197HUGHES, J.

It is clear from a reading of the granting clause, together with the habendum clause, that the interest conveyed was a fee simple, subject to be defeated upon the happening of a certain event, that is, that the grantee should die without .issue surviving her. The limiting clause that it should be for her lifetime only should she die without issue, does not create a life estate only, but, as said before, creates a base fee subject to be defeated upon the happening of this event, and hence the rule in Shelley’s case as claimed by plaintiff cannot be applied.

The defendant is in this case not representing any other person or class of persons than himself. He has no interest in the property. He is simply one of the heirs of the grantor; and, from other evidence in the case, would be also an heir of the grantee, being her brother. There is no present interest conveyed to him either directly or indirectly. If the grantee have issue surviving her, of course the estate would ripen into a perfect fee simple. If she should die without issue "surviving her, then those who are nearest of kin would take the fee.

It must follow, from all that appears in the case, that defendant could have no present interest adverse to the plaintiff and her title should be quieted as to him, as 'prayed for in the petition. This was the only purpose of this law suit and this is all that our decree can cover. Therefore the judgment is for the plaintiff, quieting her title as against the defendant.

Before Judges Hughes, Justice and Crow.
#### CHURCH, SALE OF in re

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21246.

Decided April 10, 1929

Syllabus by

ALLEN, J

CORPORATIONS — Real Estate (510 Dk)

(160 C2) Where a quit-claim deed, for valuable consideration, conveys to trustees of an unincorporated church association certain real property, “To have and to hold * * * unto the said grantees and their successors * * * so long as said lot is held and used for church purposes,” without any provision for forfeiture or reversion, such statement is not a condition or limitation of the grant. Since the deed contains no provision for reversion or forfeiture, .all of the estate of the grantor was conveyed to the grantees. Hence, a church building affixed to the realty does not pass to the heirs of the grantors when such lot and building cease to be used for church purposes.

Kinkade, Robinson and Matthias, JJ, concur. Marshall, CJ, dissents.
#### § 1620.29 Relationship to other labor laws.

If a higher minimum wage than that required under the FLSA is applicable to a particular sex pursuant to State law, and the employer pays the higher State minimum wage to male or female employees, it must also pay the higher rate to employees of the opposite sex for equal work in order to comply with the EPA. Similarly, if overtime premiums are paid to members of one sex because of a legal requirement, such premiums must also be paid to employees of the other sex.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of S.H., A.H., and * From the 326th District Court

C.K., children, of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 9937-CX.

No. 11-21-00235-CV * April 7, 2022

* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
§ 1430.1 Scope and purpose. ( a ) This part contains the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service's regulations implementing section 8(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770, (5 U.S.C. App.)), which requires each agency head to establish uniform guidelines and management controls for the advisory committees. These regulations supplement the Government-wide guidelines issued jointly by the Office of Management and Budget and the Department of Justice, and should be read in conjunction with them.
( b ) The regulations provided under this part do not apply to statutorily created or established advisory committees of the Service, to the extent that such statutes have specific provisions different from those promulgated herein.
<PAGE>


                                                              EXHIBIT 99.3

                     CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with this annual report of Ultrapetrol (Bahamas) Limited
(the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

      This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, and not for any other purpose.


/s/ Felipe Menendez Ross
--------------------------------
Felipe Menendez Ross

Director, Chief Executive
Officer, and President

d401975_ex99-3.txt


<PAGE>