alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 OF GROVE INVESTORS
LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          17,933
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  143,263
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,057
<INVENTORY>                                    175,181
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               346,432
<PP&E>                                         208,128
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 731,757
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          218,324
<BONDS>                                        356,217
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (138,748)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   731,757
<SALES>                                        850,562
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               850,562
<CGS>                                          725,680
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  170,681
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   996
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              59,911
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (113,026)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,255
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (119,281)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          302
<NET-INCOME>                                 (118,979)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 1471.520 Who places the information into the EPLS? Federal officials who take actions to exclude persons under this part or officials who are responsible for identifying disqualified persons must enter the following information about those persons into the *EPLS*: ( a ) Information required by § 1471.515(a);
( b ) The Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) of the excluded or disqualified person, including the social security number (SSN) for an individual, if the number is available and may be disclosed under law;
( c ) Information about an excluded or disqualified person, generally within five working days, after— ( 1 ) Taking an exclusion action;
( 2 ) Modifying or rescinding an exclusion action;
( 3 ) Finding that a person is disqualified; or
( 4 ) Finding that there has been a change in the status of a person who is listed as disqualified.
#### FLEURON v. CITY OF MOBILE. (Two Cases)

(Decided April 6, 1916.)

Appeal from Mobile City Court.

Heard before Hon. O. J. Semmes.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per Curiam.

Appeals dismissed for want of prosecution.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of WesternSierra Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Anthony J. Gould, Executive Vice President,Chief Financial and Chief Accounting Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | May 5, 2006                             |   | /s/ Anthony J.  Gould |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------|--------|
|   | Anthony J. Gould,                            |
|   | Chief Financial and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
#### RUSSELL v. STATE

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist., Cuyahoga Co.

Nos. 8699 to 8701 inc.

Decided Oct. 8, 1928.

Walter I. Krewson, Cleveland, for Russell.

Edward C. Stanton, Cleveland, for State.

*6WILLIAMS, J.

The principal contention of counsel for plaintiff in error is that the sentences were erroneous in that the plaintiff in error was only twenty years of age at the time and could only be sentenced to the Ohio State Reformatory and not to the penitentiary, tinder General Code, Section 2131.

There is no question that the Ohio State Reformatory at Mansfield is a state prison. Under Section 2131 General Code the superintendent is required to receive all male 'criminals between sixteen and thirty years, lawfully sentenced to the reformatory, providing they have not been “previously sentenced' to a state prison,” and the court pronouncing sentence has no power to impose a sentence to the Ohio State Reformatory. where the convicted person has been previously sentenced to the Ohio State Reformatory. If a convicted person between sixteen and twenty-one has not been previously. sentenced to a state prison, the court shall sentence him to the Ohio State Reformatory, but if he is between twenty-one and thirty years and has not previously been sentenced to a state prison, the court may sentence him to the reformatory if amenable to reformatory methods, otherwise to the penitentiary.

The trial judg.e was acting wholly within his power and judgement will be affirmed.

Sullivan, P. J. and Levine, J. concur.
#### § 13.42 Wage and Hour Division conciliation.

After receipt of a complaint, the Administrator may seek to resolve the matter through conciliation.
#### EFCO-FA Development Corp., Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 93054.)

[698 NYS2d 53]

—In an eminent domain proceeding, the claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Silverman, J.), dated January 6, 1999, which denied its motion for a trial preference pursuant to CPLR 3403 (a) (3) or (4).

*339Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The claimant sought a trial preference on the ground that its President, who was also a 35% stockholder, was 74 years of age at the time of the application, and in poor health (see, CPLR 3403 [a] [3], [4]). Contrary to the claimant’s contention, its President, as a corporate officer and partial stockholder, does not possess a cognizable cause of action (see, *Cooney Bros. v State of New York,*24 NY2d 387, 392; *cf., Borenstein v City of New York,*248 AD2d 425; *Milton Point Realty Co. v Haas,*91 AD2d 678; *Bobowski v Toomey,*108 Misc 2d 1061) and is not the real party in interest (see, *Chalmers v Eaton Corp.,*71 AD2d 721; *cf., Campbell v Kelly,*42 AD2d 601). Therefore, the claimant’s application for a trial preference due to the age and health of its officer was properly denied.

Furthermore, the claimant’s request for a trial preference on the ground of financial hardship was also properly denied since there was no proof submitted as to the actual fiscal condition of the corporation *(see,*CPLR 3403 [a] [3]; *La Porta v Fretto Enters.,*100 AD2d 713). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Actuate Corporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge on the date hereof, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated March 16, 2005



|                                                                                                                |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/    PETER I. CITTADINIPeter I. Cittadini President and Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



|                                                                                                                                                                       |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/    DANIEL A. GAUDREAUDaniel A. Gaudreau Senior Vice
President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo,*                     or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                 

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​. 

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 22, 2000. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (JoAnne F. Lewellen, Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291: 

1. Ellingson Corporation, Kenyon, Minnesota; has applied to engage in selling general insurance, in a town of less than 5,000, pursuant to § 225.28(b)(11) of Regulation Y. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 2, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-11290 Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Final environmental impactstatement for the Gateway West Transmission Line Project, Wyoming and Idaho**
 
Final
 
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Appendix F
Appendix G
Appendix H
Appendix I
Appendix J
Appendix K
Appendix L
Appendix M
Appendix N
Appendix O
 
 
SuDoc Number:I 53.59:G 22
Item Number:0629-E-09 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000930401
 
February 7, 2018
**s&ohooln** am tbs lmttitutians of the #t&e es**tabllshad in**  the ctnmticls, sad, AS 

### a &w-t of the stats’s go%tmm6n

+utlpolicy 

### leaiatained lil part frm t-8 and other fund dkmtl.y **ftarnlshed** by the state and in part from intereat on the funds reell.%ed kmt the lsnds 5tttmstet¶ by the 8tate to 

### the famageamttt



### of the capafss16nast eourb of ihe tounties a.?ethus trnstees f’or af the state sahools,

. ~. . 4 such trustmm their pwerr mustbe 

### Serlet4 eonsitru8d. Thay mayneither divest 

### thdYar of the pcwsra eaaie~~08 nor aaanm powers not ooaferre&. Cc+ 

### rdsslamms' 

### courte&all. 'astaiae such powsrr aad $twbdieticm ever all cmmty budao8s 

### as is cenfwred by this Constitution ttntl the Iws of the state or as mayba herkftar presoribsdo *

. . .* xxtvhv of th6 fotxtgtahg it 3,s8w CplttbJl 

### th%tthe 

### counties are tnwtous for the baafit of the stati 

### @dls rrm mWols urd the fW ltuWpt&mt %8uaty of E2l.l Teams8 !Frmatse

$or th9 Pstmaeta

t-Pmdundu,Az'ti~.282+, 

### Vmmzm*s Annotated

T- StatutM' mqnirad to k pkpercr ~a UttAtd 

### &ate8 Uar~.l5amb msr&wml hymawy art 8U the aeh4&llllt the 

### pTop6rpadlega iawrtptlonto 

### be

' **Tntatlag** 

### that **the forego~**  **hrlly anmfa41**  **your In**  **quti-y, ve**  **am**

**‘ Paprr**  **very truly**  **ATTm?cI fa!lrim**  **OF Tas**  **By I%/**  **A&ll Mlll%MR**
#### Wilma Rosenberg et al., Respondents, *v.*Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Association of America, Appellant.

Argued January 25, 1937;

decided March 9, 1937.

*Henry C. Moses*and *Charles J. Nehrbas*for appellant.

*Joseph C. Salzman*and *David S. Romanov*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Loughran, Einch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: Hupps, J.
## 2006
HF PM Production lbs/dayMethodlbs/dayMethod ST Normal Operation January 172 CEM 1707 EPA M5 298 Yes February 150 CEM 1204EPA M5 300 Yes March 187 CEM 1336EPA M5 297 Yes April 132 CEM 1285 EPA M5 300 Yes May 138 CEM 1316EPA M5 299 Yes June 154 CEM 1965 EPA M5 299 Yes July 150 CEM 1254EPA M5 296 Yes August 150 CEM 1428EPA M5 299 Yes September 165 CEM 1553 EPA M5 303 Yes October 172 CEM 1863 EPA M5 298 Yes November 184 CEM 1997 EPA M5 299 Yes December 188 CEM 1929 EPA M5 303 Yes



## 2007
HF PM Production

lbs/dayMethodlbs/dayMethod ST Normal Operation January 168 CEM 1555 EPA M5 301 Yes February 134 CEM 1466EPA M5 299 Yes March 147 CEM 2030EPA M5 303 Yes April 129 CEM 1487 EPA M5 301 Yes May 116 CEM 1667 EPA M5 300 Yes June 120 CEM 1166EPA M5 302 Yes July 173 CEM 1368EPA M5 303 Yes August 148 CEM 1258EPA M5 305 Yes September 156 CEM 1149 EPA M5 302 Yes October 143 CEM 1005 EPA M5 304 Yes November 147 CEM 1351 EPA M5 305 Yes December 157 CEM 1082 EPA M5 306 Yes



## 2008
HF PM Production

lbs/dayMethodlbs/dayMethod ST Normal Operation January 172 CEM 1041 EPA M5 303 Yes February 159 CEM 1260EPA M5 301 Yes March 159 CEM 1478EPA M5 302 Yes April 152 CEM 1096EPA M5 303 Yes May 152 CEM 1153 EPA M5 302 Yes June 177 CEM 1277 EPA M5 301 Yes July 149 CEM 1262 EPA M5 303 Yes August 149 CEM 1415 EPA M5 304 Yes September 148 CEM 1395 EPA M5 305 Yes October 151 CEM 1536EPA M5 304 Yes November 141 CEM 1425 EPA M5 307 Yes December 135 CEM 1584EPA M5 304 Yes

## 2009
HF PM Production lbs/dayMethodlbs/dayMethod ST Normal Operation January 148 CEM 1680EPA M5 302 Yes February 148 CEM 1625 EPA M5 297 Yes March 125 CEM 1830EPA M5 298 Yes April 123 CEM 1833 EPA M5 290 Yes May 121 CEM 1736EPA M5 289 Yes June 149 CEM 1951 EPA M5 288 Yes July 162 CEM 1662 EPA M5 287 Yes August 159 CEM 2114EPA M5 287 Yes September 143 CEM 1899 EPA M5 291 Yes October 149 CEM 1822 EPA M5 288 Yes November 153 CEM 1913 EPA M5 291 Yes December 193 CEM 2000EPA M5 288 Yes



## 2010
HF PM Production

lbs/dayMethodlbs/dayMethod ST Normal Operation January 186 CEM 2362 EPA M5 290 Yes February 168 CEM 2324EPA M5 292 Yes March 141 CEM 2085 EPA M5 292 Yes April 136 CEM 1869 EPA M5 299 Yes May 157 CEM 1798EPA M5 298 Yes June 160 CEM 1798EPA M5 295 Yes July 185 CEM 1805 EPA M5 291 Yes August 207 CEM 1706EPA M5 290 Yes September 237 CEM 1531 EPA M5 291 Yes October 293 CEM 1885 EPA M5 294 Yes November 271 CEM 2080EPA M5 299 Yes December 225 CEM 2186EPA M5 296 Yes



## 2011
HF PM Production

lbs/dayMethodlbs/dayMethod ST Normal Operation January 206 CEM 1822 EPA M5 298 Yes February 201 CEM 2119 EPA M5 297 Yes March 332 CEM 2321 EPA M5 370 Line 2 Restart April 316 CEM 2545 EPA M5 389 Line 2 Restart May 378 CEM 2292 EPA M5 397 Line 2 Restart
#### § 61.158 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999             JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999             JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                          34,220                   7,447
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,659                  21,901
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,780                     575
<INVENTORY>                                    726,172                 280,267
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               862,668                 312,676
<PP&E>                                         377,761                 134,896
<DEPRECIATION>                                  98,349                  77,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,261,516                 449,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          551,835                 199,540
<BONDS>                                        435,526                 106,542
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            54                      27 
<OTHER-SE>                                     220,957                 129,142
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,261,516                 449,626
<SALES>                                      1,220,759                 848,108
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,220,759                 848,108
<CGS>                                          763,353                 524,586
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  763,353                 524,586
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               424,996                 279,924
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,193                   1,040
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,517                   7,732
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,499                  35,042
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,887                  14,670
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,612                  20,372
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,612                  20,372
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
#### Blair S. Williams et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Rhoades, Williams & Company, Appellants, *v.*The State *of*New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 23664.)

Submitted November 20, 1936;

decided December 31, 1936.

*Francis N. Bangs*for appellants.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Leon M. Layden*and *Caleb Candee Brown, Jr.,*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of *Vaughan*v. *State of New York (212*N. Y. 102).

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
§ 13.58 Administrator ruling. ( a ) Questions regarding the application and interpretation of the rules contained in this part may be referred to the Administrator, who shall issue an appropriate ruling. Requests for such rulings should be addressed to the Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210.
( b ) Any interested party may appeal to the Administrative Review Board for review of a final ruling of the Administrator issued under paragraph (a) of this section. The petition for review shall be filed with the Administrative Review Board within 30 calendar days of the date of the ruling.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4851 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4851

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 315 Addicks Howell Road in Houston, Texas, as the ``Deputy Sandeep 
                 Singh Dhaliwal Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 23 (legislative day, October 19), 2020

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself and Mr. Cruz) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 315 Addicks Howell Road in Houston, Texas, as the ``Deputy Sandeep 
                 Singh Dhaliwal Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEPUTY SANDEEP SINGH DHALIWAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 315 Addicks Howell Road in Houston, Texas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Deputy Sandeep Singh Dhaliwal Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Deputy 
Sandeep Singh Dhaliwal Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```