alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
181017 SCH ORD RE COFINA DS URG MOT VERSION OCTOBER 17, 2018 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

----------------------------------------------------------x

In re: PROMESA

Title III

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered)

et al.,

Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x

In re: PROMESA

Title III

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of No. 17 BK 3284-LTS

PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING

CORPORATION (COFINA),

Debtor.

----------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING OF URGENT MOTION OF PUERTO RICO SALES 

TAX FINANCING CORPORATION FOR ORDER (I) SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING 

OBJECTIONS TO COFINA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND REPLIES 

THERETO AND (II) SHORTENING NOTICE PERIOD FOR DISCLOSURE STATEMENT HEARING

The Court has received and reviewed the Urgent Motion of Puerto Rico Sales Tax 

Financing Corporation for Order (I) Setting Deadline for Filing Objections to COFINA 

 1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing 

Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority 

(“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of 

Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4056 Filed:10/17/18 Entered:10/17/18 16:16:28 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
181017 SCH ORD RE COFINA DS URG MOT VERSION OCTOBER 17, 2018 2

Disclosure Statement and Replies Thereto and (II) Shortening Notice Period for Disclosure 

Statement Hearing (the “Motion”) filed by the Financial Oversight and Management Board for 

Puerto Rico (the “Movant”). (Docket Entry No. 4054 in Case No. 17-3283.2) Opposition papers 

to the Motion must be filed by October 18, 2018 at 12:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time). 

Movant’s reply papers must be filed by October 18, 2018 at 4:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard 

Time).

SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 17, 2018

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

 2 The Motion was also filed at Docket Entry No. 304 in Case No. 17-3284.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4056 Filed:10/17/18 Entered:10/17/18 16:16:28 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 93.117 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes a special air traffic rule for aircraft operating at the Lorain County Regional Airport, Lorain County, Ohio.

[Doc. No. FAA-2002-13235, 68 FR 9795, Feb. 28, 2003]
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

BOEING VARIOUS 2013 TO PRESENT Other. List below. 

Other/Additional Information: Discussions with Boeing to investigate and to fix the unsafe 

condition.
ex-10_1.htm









Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K

 

Exhibit 10.1




 

 



 



 







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



2







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



3







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



4







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



5







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



6







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



7







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



8







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



9







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



10







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



11







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



12







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



13







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



14







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



15







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



16







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



17







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



18







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



19







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



20







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



21







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



22







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 



 



23







 


Trilliant Exploration Corporation 8-K





 

 

24
EXHIBIT 13.2

                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with this annual report of Ultrapetrol (Bahamas) Limited (the
     "Company") on Form 20-F for the period  ending  December 31, 2005, as filed
     with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
     "Report"),  the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  hereby
     certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:

     (3)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

     This  certification  is made solely for the  purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section
     1350, and not for any other purpose.


Date: April [  ], 2006

/s/ Leonard J. Hoskinson
--------------------------------
Leonard J. Hoskinson


Chief Financial Officer



SK 02351 0009 661379 v3
4/27/06
Kathy Pendleton 

<KPENDLET@tceq.state.tx.u

s>

02/16/2007 09:37 AM

To Snyder@listserv.tceq.state.tx.us, Erik 

Snyder/R6/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

bcc

Subject Important - BART CAMx modeling guidance change

History: This message has been forwarded.

Based upon concerns expressed by EPA Region 6 and several of the FLMs on the lack of 

conservativeness of the CAMx modeling system for estimating visibility impacts at Class I 

areas, the TCEQ has decided to revise the CAMx BART modeling guidance to indicate that the 

High-1st-High and the 0.5 deciview threshold should be used to determine whether or not a 

source has screened out using the CAMx modeling platform.

If you have any questions about this decision, please contact Jocelyn Mellberg at 512-239-0164.

--- 

You are currently subscribed to bart as: snyder.erik@epamail.epa.gov. 

To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-112245-63232K@listserv.tceq.state.tx.us
ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE
PURSUANT TO THE SALE SERVICING AND ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT (S)


In accordance with the  Agreement(s),  I, the undersigned,  hereby certify as to
each Mortgage Loan being serviced by the below named institution that:

1. I am an  "Officer"  as  defined  in the above  referenced  Agreement,  and am
empowered and authorized to issue this Annual Certification.

2. To the best of my knowledge and upon reasonable investigation,  the servicing
of the Mortgage Loans during the year preceding the last Anniversary Date of the
Agreement has been  conducted in compliance  with the Agreement  except for such
exceptions as I am setting forth below.

Exceptions (if any):

3. A review of  activities  with  respect to  performances  under the  Agreement
during the year  preceding the last  Anniversary  Date of the Agreement has been
made under my supervision and to the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
no default  exists as of the above date in the  fulfillment  of any  obligations
under the Agreement other than the events of default, if any, which I am listing
below with the nature and status thereof.

Events of Default (if any):

This certification covers the period of January 1, 1998 through December 31,
1998

AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY
By: Elaine Stangl
Title: Executive Vice President, Loan Servicing


Investor:
#### Weston *vs.*Worden.

ALBANY,

March, 1839.

Where a plaintiff declared in slander for words charging him with malpractice as a physician, he was permitted after the cause was twice noticed for trial, to amend by adding words of the same character, on payment of the costs, of a new plea or notice of justification, should the same become necessary, and also on payment of the costs of the motion ; but he was not allowed to amend by adding words charging him with being a quack or practising without a diploma, as there was a probability that the latter words were barred by the statute of limitations.

Motion by plaintiff for leave to amend declaration after the cause had been twice noticed for trial. The action is *slander*for charging plaintiff with mal-practice as a physician. The defendant pleaded the general issue, and gave notice of special matter in justification. The plaintiff asks leave to insert other words, imputing mal-practice, and also charging the plaintiff with being a quack, or practicing as a physician without a diploma.

*J. Rhoades,*for the motion.

*J. L. Wendell,*contra.

*By the Court,*

Bronson, J.

So far as relates to other words of the same character, or imputing the same offence with those already contained in the declaration, the plaintiff may amend on payment of the costs of opposing this motion. *649and the costs of the plea and notice, if the defendant chooses to answer anew. 12 Wendell, 228. 9 id. 430. The cause of action is the same, and the oniy effect of the amendment may be to relieve the plaintiff against the consequences of a variance.

But wé cannot allow him to amend by inserting a new cause of action, where, as in this case, the statute of limitations has probably run. . The amendment must not, therefore, extend to such words as charge the plaintiff with being a quack, or practising without a diploma.

Ordered accordingly,
§ 417.233 Analysis for an unguided suborbital launch vehicle flown with a wind weighting safety system. For each launch of an unguided suborbital launch vehicle flown with a wind weighting safety system, in addition to the other requirements in this subpart outlined in § 417.201(c), the flight safety analysis must: ( a ) Establish flight commit criteria and other launch safety rules that a launch operator must implement to control the risk to the public from potential adverse effects resulting from normal and malfunctioning flight;
( b ) Establish any wind constraints under which launch may occur; and
( c ) Include a wind weighting analysis that establishes the launcher azimuth and elevation settings that correct for the windcocking and wind-drift effects on the unguided suborbital launch vehicle.
#### § 102.151 Settlement.

The applicant and the General Counsel may agree on a proposed settlement of the award before final action on the application. If a prevailing party and the General Counsel agree on a proposed settlement of an award before an application has been filed, the proposed settlement must be filed with the application. All such settlements are subject to approval by the Board.

[82 FR 11783, Feb. 24, 2017]
#### Antolin Alles, *Appellant,*v. Fernando Diaz, *Appellee.*

Where the testimony is conflicting in an equity cause, but there is ample evidence to sustain the finding of the chancellor on the merits, and no errors of law appear, the decree will be affirmed.

This case was decided by Division A.

Appealed from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*Wall*& *McCay,*for Appellant;

*F. M. Simonton,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

— The appellant filed a bill to dissolve an alleged copartnership with appellee and for a receiver and an accounting. The answer admitted a former partnership, but denied the then existence of a partnership and asserted an exclusive right to the property by virtue of conveyances for value made by the complainant to the defendant more than four years before this suit was brought. Replication was filed and voluminous, testi*422incmy was taken. The chancellor dismissed the bill and denied an application for a rehearing, and the complainant appealed.

Conveyances of property used by the former partnership and the possession of the defendant thereunder were shown in evidence. The complainant undertook to show that the asserted conveyances were not made for the purpose of depriving him of his right therein, but for other purposes personal to the complainant.

The testimony is conflicting, but there is ample evidence to sustain the finding in favor of the defendant. No rights of third parties are involved. The rights of the parties between themselves should be left as they themselves fixed them, no unilateral fraud or over-reaching being made to clearty appear as against the finding of the chancellor. See Baxter v. Liddon, 62 Fla. 428, 56 South. Rep. 410.

The decree is affirmed.

Whitfield, C.. J., and Shackleford and Cocicrelc, J. J., concur;

Taylor, Hocker and Parkhill, J. J., concur in the opinion.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 93 (Friday, May 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12038]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--IAP Research, Inc.: Electromagnetic Dynamic 
Compaction II

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 1, 1999, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), IAP Research, Inc. has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the 
parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 
Act, the identities of the parties are IAP Research, Inc., Dayton, OH; 
General Motors Powertrain, Pontiac, MI; Zenith Sintered Products, 
Germantown, WI; and Delphi, Anderson, IN. The nature and objectives of 
the venture are to conduct research on Electromagnetic Dynamic 
Compaction. The activities of this project will be partially funded by 
an award from the Advanced Technology Program, National Institute of 
Standards and Technology, Department of Commerce.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-12038 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
̈¦§15 

 ̈¦§15 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

HiLine District Office 

Locatable Minerals

Alternatives A & E
 

Maps show the Locatable Mineral

Estate and the areas that are 

withdrawn from mineral entry

under Alternative A and 

recommended for withdrawal 

under Alternative E. 

¬ 

Created by the Malta Field Office in December 2012 

Albers Equal Area, NAD83, Meters 

A All b be er rt ta a Glacier

National Park SSaass kka att cchheewwaann GLACIER 

232 

Browning Cut Bank TOOLE HILL BLAINE

LIBERTY 

2 

")

£¤

£¤89

Blackfeet Indi

Reservati

an 

on 

Shelby 

Chester Havre 

Chinook 

CHOUTEAU
 

PHILLIPS 

Fort Benton 

CMR National

Wildlife Refuge 

£¤87

VALLEY 

Malta

Ft. Belknap Rocky Boy's Indian Reservation Indian Reservation 

Glasgow

66 £¤191 ")

Map 2.13 

Alternative A

(Current Management) 

0 25 50 

Miles 

Restricted 

Withdrawal 

Expiring Withdrawal 

Not Analyzed 

Interstate 

Highway or State Route 

RMP Boundary

County

Towns 

1:1,750,000 

Alternative

(Preferred 

E

) 

A All b be er rt ta a Glacier

National Park SSaass kka att cchheewwaann

GLACIER 

Browning 

Blackfeet Indian

Reservation
 

£¤89

")232

Cut Bank TOOLE BLAINE 

£¤87

HILL 

£¤2 Shelby 

LIBERTY
 Chinook Havre 

Chester 

CHOUTEAU 

Fort Benton 

£¤ ")

VALLEY 

Malta

Ft. Belknap Rocky Boy's 

Indian Reservation Indian Reservation PHILLIPS

Glasgow

66 

191 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is 

made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the 

accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for 

purposes not intended by BLM. This map may not meet

National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was

developed through digital means and information may be 

updated without notification. 

CMR National

Wildlife Refuge
#### § 1650.112 Interest, penalties, and administrative costs.

Unless a debt is paid in full within 30 days of receipt of the Notice of Debt, the Commission will charge interest at the rate established in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3717 effective on the date of delinquency, and a processing charge pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3717. The Commission will charge a penalty, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3717(e)(2) not to exceed 6 percent a year, on the amount due on a debt that is delinquent more than 90 days. This charge shall accrue from the date of delinquency. If an employee files a timely proposal for a repayment agreement, request for waiver, or a request for a hearing, interest, penalties, and administrative costs will be suspended during the time the Commission is considering such request(s).
§ 100.604 Monetary limitations on NLRB's authority. The NLRB's authority to compromise a debt or to suspend or terminate collection action on a debt covered by these procedures is limited by 31 U.S.C. 3711(a) to claims that: ( a ) Have not been referred to another Federal Agency for further collection actions; and
( b ) Do not exceed $100,000 (exclusive of any interest) or such higher amount as the Attorney General shall from time to time prescribe for purposes of compromise or suspension or termination of collection activity.
Redline Word version Bill Maxwell to: Cortney_Higgins 11/15/2012 04:47 PM Cc: RobertJ Wayland

EO12866_MATS_Reconsideration_2060-AR62_Propo sal_redline_20121106 vs 20121115.docx

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430 FAX: 919-541-5450
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1: PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Nello Gonfiantini, III, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Specialty Trust, Inc.2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely 97




---



##### 



affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. /s/ Nello Gonfiantini III
    
    Dated this 29th day of March 2005Name:
    
    Nello Gonfiantini IIITitle:
    
    Chairman of the Board and President
 98
#### § 1614.408 Civil action: Equal Pay Act.

A complainant is authorized under section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 216(b)) to file a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction within two years or, if the violation is willful, three years of the date of the alleged violation of the Equal Pay Act regardless of whether he or she pursued any administrative complaint processing. Recovery of back wages is limited to two years prior to the date of filing suit, or to three years if the violation is deemed willful; liquidated damages in an equal amount may also be awarded. The filing of a complaint or appeal under this part shall not toll the time for filing a civil action.

[57 FR 12646, Apr. 10, 1992. Redesignated at 64 FR 37659, July 12, 1999]
###### Editorial Note on Part 399

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 399 appear at 84 FR 15947, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 399.1 Applicability.

All statements of general policy adopted by the Department for the guidance of the public will be published in this part, except as provided in § 399.2.