alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Herman Quittner et al. *vs.*William A. Comstock et als.

* First Judicial District, Hartford,

March Term, 1917.

Prentice, C. J., Roraback, Wheeler, Beach and Shumway, Js.

The bona fide owner and assignee of a mortgage who acquired the same for value has a right to rely upon, and to foreclose, the apparent record title of the mortgagor, which cannot be questioned by the latter or one claiming under him, nor by any equitable owners of the land for whom the mortgagor was in fact a trustee.

Submitted on briefs March 7th—

decided June 1st, 1917.

Suit to foreclose a mortgage of several tracts of land and for possession of the premises, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in Fairfield County, *Williams, J.;*facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiffs, and appeal by the defendants Comstock and Roberson.

*No error.*

*George P. Rowell*and *Warren F. Cressy,*for the appellant (defendant Comstock).

*Warren F. Cressy,*for the appellant (defendant Roberson).

*580
      *John Keogh*and *Nehmiah Candee,*with whom was *John T.*Dwyer, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

Transferred from third judicial district.

Shumway, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage. This case was tried with the case of Fosdick *vs.*Roberson *et al.,*and by stipulation of the parties all the facts found in that case, so far as applicable to this, are to be considered as part of the record. The only additional fact found, is that the plaintiffs in this action are the bona fide holders and owners of the mortgage, and they acquired the same for a valuable consideration. The mortgage in question is the one given by Roberson to Fosdick as part of the consideration for the conveyance to Roberson by Fosdick of seven parcels of land, and these parcels are the same described in the deed and referred to in the first case. The plaintiffs hold the same by assignment.

The mortgage was clearly given for the benefit of the purchaser of the land, and the assignee of the mortgage had a right to rely upon Roberson’s apparent title, and that title cannot be questioned by Roberson, Comstock, or any of the equitable owners of the land. The trial court gave judgment for the plaintiffs, foreclosing the defendants unless the mortgage ’ note was paid before February 1st, 1916, and absolute title to the premises will pass to the plaintiffs if the defendants fail to pay the amount due, freed of any trust and foreclosing the equitable interest of the persons for whom Comstock may be regarded as trustee, though they are not made parties to the action.

There is no error.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

Notice is hereby given that the following applicant has filed with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder—Ocean Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 515). 

Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicant should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573. 

## Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder Transportation Intermediary Applicant 

Pactrans Marine, Inc., 12801 S. Fiqueroa Street, Los Angeles, CA 90061. 

Officers: Jesse Domingo, Director (Qualifying Individual), Chee Tao Tsui, President.

Dated: May 9, 2000. 

Bryant L. VanBrakle, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-11991 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### §§ 435.44-435.50 [Reserved]
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4656 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a reduction in certain 

loan fees for certain veterans affected by major disasters. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2020 

Ms. HIRONO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a 

reduction in certain loan fees for certain veterans affected by major disasters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDUCING LOAN FEES FOR CERTAIN VET4 ERANS AFFECTED BY MAJOR DISASTERS. 

5 Section 3729(b)(4) of title 38, United States Code, 

6 is amended— 

7 (1) by striking subparagraph (D), and inserting 

8 the following new subparagraph (D): 

9 ‘‘(D)(i) The term ‘initial loan’ means a loan to 

10 a veteran guaranteed under section 3710 or made 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4656 IS

1 under section 3711 of this title if the veteran has 

2 never obtained a loan guaranteed under section 

3 3710 or made under section 3711 of this title. 

4 ‘‘(ii) If a veteran has obtained a loan guaran5 teed under section 3710 or made under section 3711 

6 of this title and the dwelling securing such loan was 

7 substantially damaged or destroyed by a major dis8 aster declared by the President under section 401 of 

9 the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emer10 gency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170), the Sec11 retary shall treat as an initial loan, as defined in 

12 clause (i), the next loan the Secretary guarantees or 

13 makes to such veteran under section 3710 or 3711, 

14 respectively, if— 

15 ‘‘(I) such loan is guaranteed or made be16 fore the date that is three years after the date 

17 on which the dwelling was substantially dam18 aged or destroyed; and 

19 ‘‘(II) such loan is only for repairs or con20 struction, as determined by the Secretary.’’; 

21 and 

22 (2) in subparagraph (E), by striking ‘‘if the vet23 eran has previously obtained a loan guaranteed 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4656 IS

1 under section 3710 or made under section 3711 of 

2 this title’’ and inserting ‘‘that is not an initial loan’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### § 102.180 Requests for special permission to appeal referred to Chief Administrative Law Judge.

During any period when the Board lacks a quorum, any request for special permission to appeal filed or pending pursuant to § 102.26 will be referred to the Chief Administrative Law Judge in Washington, DC, for ruling. Such rulings by the Chief Administrative Law Judge, and orders in connection therewith, may not be appealed directly to the Board, but will be considered by the Board in reviewing the record if exception to the ruling or order is included in the statement of exceptions filed with the Board pursuant to § 102.46.

[82 FR 11786, Feb. 24, 2017]
§ 61.94 Student pilot seeking a sport pilot certificate or a recreational pilot certificate: Operations at airports within, and in airspace located within, Class B, C, and D airspace, or at airports with an operational control tower in other airspace. ( a ) A student pilot seeking a sport pilot certificate or a recreational pilot certificate who wants to obtain privileges to operate in Class B, C, and D airspace, at an airport located in Class B, C, or D airspace, and to, from, through, or at an airport having an operational control tower, must receive and log ground and flight training from an authorized instructor in the following aeronautical knowledge areas and areas of operation: ( 1 ) The use of radios, communications, navigation systems and facilities, and radar services.
( 2 ) Operations at airports with an operating control tower, to include three takeoffs and landings to a full stop, with each landing involving a flight in the traffic pattern, at an airport with an operating control tower.
( 3 ) Applicable flight rules of part 91 of this chapter for operations in Class B, C, and D airspace and air traffic control clearances.
( 4 ) Ground and flight training for the specific Class B, C, or D airspace for which the solo flight is authorized, if applicable, within the 90-day period preceding the date of the flight in that airspace. The flight training must be received in the specific airspace area for which solo flight is authorized.
( 5 ) Ground and flight training for the specific airport located in Class B, C, or D airspace for which the solo flight is authorized, if applicable, within the 90-day period preceding the date of the flight at that airport. The flight and ground training must be received at the specific airport for which solo flight is authorized.
( b ) The authorized instructor who provides the training specified in paragraph (a) of this section must provide a logbook endorsement that certifies the student has received that training and is proficient to conduct solo flight in that specific airspace or at that specific airport and in those aeronautical knowledge areas and areas of operation specified in this section.
[Doc. No. FAA-2001-11133, 69 FR 44867, July 27, 2004]
#### § 93.97 Operations in the SFRA.

Notwithstanding the provisions of § 91.131(a) of this chapter, an air traffic control authorization is not required in the Los Angeles Special Flight Rules Area for operations in compliance with § 93.95. All other provisions of § 91.131 of this chapter apply to operations in the Los Angeles Special Flight Rules Area.
**Exhibit32**

 

**Certification**

 

Each undersigned officer of Capital CrossingPreferred Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’squarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004(the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.  This certification is providedsolely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Exchange Act.  In accordance with clause (ii) of Item601(b)(32), this certification shall not be deemed (i) “filed” for purposes ofSection 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of thatsection or (ii) to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extentthat the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 
| Date: November 15, 2004 | By:                                        | /s/ Richard Wayne |   |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------|-------------------|--------|
|                    | Richard Wayne                              |
|                    | *President (Principal Executive  Officer)* |

 

 
| Date: November 15, 2004 | By:                                        | /s/ Edward F. Mehm |   |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                    | Edward F. Mehm                             |
|                    | *Treasurer (Principal Financial  Officer)* |

 

----
**Exhibit32**

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Terry G. Roussel andSharon C. Kaiser, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLCon Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations ofCornerstone Realty Fund, LLC.
|                      | /s/ TERRY G. ROUSSEL                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: August 8, 2007 | Terry G. Roussel  Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of  Cornerstone Ventures, Inc., Managing Member of  Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC, the Managing Member of   Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC |
|                 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                 | /s/ SHARON C. KAISER                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| Date: August 8, 2007 | Sharon C. Kaiser  Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of  Cornerstone Ventures, Inc., Managing Member of  Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC, the Managing Member of  Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC  |

 

----
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13
- 13
- 00481
- CV SYLVIA ROGER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

ESTATE OF JEAN LOUIS ROGER, SR., ET AL. v. BENJAMIN KARL MUMME, JR. AND CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION On Appeal from the 319th Distri ct Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2012
- DCV
- 1731
- G

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED and RENDERED IN PART

. Th e Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED and RENDERED IN PART. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against the party incurring same

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.1(d) ; see also id. R

. 43.4

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. May 19 , 2016
#### § 100.602 Definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart, the following definitions will apply:

*Administrative Offset* means withholding money payable by the United States Government (including money payable by the United States Government on behalf of a State Government) to, or held by the Government for, a person to satisfy a debt the person owes the United States Government.

*Centralized offset* means the offset of Federal payments through the Treasury Offset Program to collect debts which creditor agencies have certified pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3716(c), 3720A(a) and applicable regulations. The term “centralized offset” includes the Treasury Offset Program's processing of offsets of Federal payments disbursed by disbursing officials other than the Department of the Treasury.

*Claim or debt* means an amount of money, funds, or property that has been determined by an agency official to be owed to the United States by a person, organization, or entity, except another Federal agency. For the purposes of *administrative offset* under 31 U.S.C. 3716, the terms *claim* and *debt* include an amount of money, funds, or property owed by a person to a State (including past-due support being enforced by a State), the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the United States Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

*Cross-servicing* means that the Department of the Treasury or another debt collection center is taking appropriate debt collection action on behalf of one or more Federal agencies or a unit or sub-agency thereof.

*Debtor* means an individual, organization, group, association, partnership, or corporation indebted to the United States, or the person or entity with legal responsibility for assuming the debtor's obligation.

*Delinquent* refers to the status of a debt and means a debt has not been paid by the date specified in the initial written demand for payment or applicable contractual agreement with the NLRB, unless other satisfactory payment arrangements have been made by that date. If the debtor fails to satisfy obligations under a payment agreement with the NLRB after other payment arrangements have been made, the debt becomes a delinquent debt.

*Payment in full* means payment of the total debt due the United States, including any interest, penalty, and administrative costs of collection assessed against the debtor.

*Recoupment* is a special method for adjusting debts arising under the same transaction or occurrence. For example, obligations arising under the same contract generally are subject to recoupment.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6546

PAULUS IRVIN PERKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BRYAN WATSON, Warden; A. P. HARVEY, Assistant Warden; OFFICER

HENSLEY; A. KILBOURNE, Lieutenant; SERGEANT SCHLUBOOM; OFFICER

COX; MAJOR J. COMBS; DOCTOR JONES; MS. STRAWBERRY; P.

SCARBERRY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District

Judge. (7:07-cv-00526-jct-mfu)

Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 20, 2008

Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paulus Irvin Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Rosalie Fessier, TIMBERLAKE,

SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 2 

PER CURIAM:

Paulus Irvin Perkins appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Perkins

v. Watson, No. 7:07-cv-00526-jct-mfu (W.D. Va. Mar. 26, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of
Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. (the “company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 27, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), I, Mary J. Twinem, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the company.


Date:
      February 26, 2010By:
              /s/ MARYJ.
      TWINEMMary
      J. Twinem
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4790 

To improve the ability of separating or retiring members of the Armed 

Forces to seek services provided by accredited veterans service officers, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 1, 2020 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO (for herself and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To improve the ability of separating or retiring members 

of the Armed Forces to seek services provided by accredited veterans service officers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Know Your Vets Act 

5 of 2020’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4790 IS

1 SEC. 2. TRANSMITTAL TO ACCREDITED VETERANS SERVICE 

2 OFFICERS OF CERTAIN INFORMATION ON 

3 MEMBERS RETIRING OR SEPARATING FROM 

4 THE ARMED FORCES. 

5 (a) TRANSMITTAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

6 ensure that a member of the Armed Forces who is sepa7 rating or retiring from the Armed Forces may elect to 

8 have the Department of Defense transmit the name and 

9 contact information of the member to all appropriate ac10 credited veterans service officers based on the post-separa11 tion mailing address provided to the Department by the 

12 member. 

13 (b) ACCREDITED VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER DE14 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘accredited veterans 

15 service officer’’ means a person who has been recognized 

16 by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under section 5902 

17 of title 38, United States Code, for the purposes of prepa18 ration, presentation, and prosecution of claims under laws 

19 administered by the Secretary. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Commonwealth *versus*Thomas Mahar.

Where a prisoner indicted for a capital offence was arraigned before a full bench, i was *held,*that he might suggest a defect in the indictment, and that the Court might adjudicate thereon, at the time of the arraignment, and before he was put upon his trial.

In a capital case it was *held,*that the indictment could not be amended, even with the consent of the prisoner

An indictment for a capital arson was found against the nefendant, in the Court of Common Pleas, and transmitted to this Court; and now upon his arraignment, before a full bench, his counsel objected that the indictment was defective, because it did not state the name of the owner of the dwellinghouse set on fire.

Austin, Attorney-General,

said that this was not the proper time to make the objection; and he urged that the prisoner should be held in custody to be tried on this indictment, or be held until the next session of the Court of Common Pleas, so that a new indictment might be returned.

But the *Court*being strongly inclined to the opinion that a conviction on such an indictment could not be sustained, thought it was proper to interfere at this time.

The attorney-general then moved to amend the indictment, and the prisoner’s counsel consented that the name of William Hayden, as owner of the house, should be inserted ; not in tending however to admit that Hayden was in fact the owner

But the *Court*were of opinion, that this was a case ii which an amendment could not be allowed, even with the. consent of the prisoner.