alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appendix D 

Miscellaneous Performance Specifications and Quality 

Assurance Procedures Supporting Documents 

 Version 1.0 

 November, 2005
Table of Contents 

1. Performance Specification 2- Specifications and Test Procedures for SO2 and NOx 

Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources, 40 CFR 60 

Appendix B, February 2000. 

2. Performance Specification 4A - Specifications and Test Procedures for Carbon 

Monoxide Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources, 40 CFR 

60 Appendix B, February 2000. 

3. Performance Specification 4B - Specifications and Test Procedures for Carbon 

Monoxide and Oxygen Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary 

Sources, 40 CFR 60 Appendix B, September 30, 1999. 

4. Appendix to Subpart EEE of Part 63 – Quality Assurance Procedures for Continuous 

Emissions Monitors Used for Hazardous Waste Combustors, 40 CFR 63 Subpart 

EEE, September 30, 1999
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of NEON Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark Cresswell, principalexecutive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/                                                                  | Mark Cresswell |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--------|
| Mark Cresswell                                                       |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) |
| August 15, 2005                                                      |

 

----
§ 61.217 Recent experience requirements. The holder of a ground instructor certificate may not perform the duties of a ground instructor unless the person can show that one of the following occurred during the preceding 12 calendar months: ( a ) Employment or activity as a ground instructor giving pilot, flight instructor, or ground instructor training;
( b ) Employment or activity as a flight instructor giving pilot, flight instructor, or ground instructor ground or flight training;
( c ) Completion of an approved flight instructor refresher course and receipt of a graduation certificate for that course; or
( d ) An endorsement from an authorized instructor certifying that the person has demonstrated knowledge in the subject areas prescribed under § 61.213(a)(3) and (a)(4), as appropriate.
[Doc. No. FAA-2006-26661, 74 FR 42562, Aug. 21, 2009]
#### § 61.8 Inapplicability of unmanned aircraft operations.

Any action conducted pursuant to part 107 of this chapter cannot be used to meet the requirements of this part.

[FAA-2020-1067, Amdt. Nos. 61-148, 85 FR 79825, Dec. 11, 2020]
§ 1614.401 Appeals to the Commission. ( a ) A complainant may appeal an agency's final action or dismissal of a complaint.
( b ) An agency may appeal as provided in § 1614.110(a).
( c ) A class agent or an agency may appeal an administrative judge's decision accepting or dismissing all or part of a class complaint; a class agent may appeal an agency's final action or an agency may appeal an administrative judge's decision on a class complaint; a class member may appeal a final decision on a claim for individual relief under a class complaint; and a class member, a class agent or an agency may appeal a final decision on a petition pursuant to § 1614.204(g)(4).
( d ) A grievant may appeal the final decision of the agency, the arbitrator or the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) on the grievance when an issue of employment discrimination was raised in a negotiated grievance procedure that permits such issues to be raised. A grievant may not appeal under this part, however, when the matter initially raised in the negotiated grievance procedure is still ongoing in that process, is in arbitration, is before the FLRA, is appealable to the MSPB or if 5 U.S.C. 7121(d) is inapplicable to the involved agency.
( e ) A complainant, agent or individual class claimant may appeal to the Commission an agency's alleged noncompliance with a settlement agreement or final decision in accordance with § 1614.504.
[57 FR 12646, Apr. 10, 1992, as amended at 64 FR 37659, July 12, 1999; 77 FR 43505, July 25, 2012]
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4597 

To require U.S. Customs and Border Protection to permit the entry into 

the United States of pets accompanying United States nationals repatriating during public health emergencies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2020 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself and Mr. BOOKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require U.S. Customs and Border Protection to permit 

the entry into the United States of pets accompanying 

United States nationals repatriating during public health 

emergencies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 The Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanently Uniting 

5 Pets Stateside Act’’ or the ‘‘PUPS Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4597 IS

1 SEC. 2. ENTRY OF PETS OF UNITED STATES NATIONALS RE2 PATRIATING DURING PUBLIC HEALTH EMER3 GENCIES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Commissioner of U.S. Cus5 toms and Border Protection shall permit the entry into 

6 the United States of a pet accompanying a covered indi7 vidual entering the United States without regard to the 

8 requirements of the Centers for Disease Control and Pre9 vention or the Department of Agriculture with respect to 

10 the entry of pets into the United States if the individual 

11 agrees to comply with those requirements as soon as prac12 ticable after entering the United States. 

13 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

14 (1) COVERED INDIVIDUAL.—The term ‘‘covered 

15 individual’’ means an individual who— 

16 (A) is a citizen of the United States or an 

17 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 

18 to the United States; 

19 (B) has been living or traveling outside the 

20 United States; and 

21 (C) is returning to the United States dur22 ing a public health emergency declared under 

23 section 319 of the Public Health Service Act 

24 (42 U.S.C. 247d). 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4597 IS

1 (2) PET.—The term ‘‘pet’’ means a domestic 

2 dog, cat, or bird. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
exv10w1wa






Exhibit 10.1(a)




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE CUSTOMER AGREEMENT

DATED MAY 30, 1997 (the “Agreement”) BY AND BETWEEN

SMITH BARNEY WESTPORT FUTURES FUND L.P. and

SALOMON SMITH BARNEY INC. (“SSB”)




          Paragraph 3 of the Agreement, effective as of March 1, 2000, is hereby amended to read as
follows:





3. Brokerage and Other Fees. The Partnership shall pay to SSB a
monthly brokerage fee equal to 11/24 of 1% of month-end Net Assets of the
Partnership (5.5% per year) in lieu of brokerage commissions on a per trade
basis. The Partnership shall also pay all National Futures Association,
exchange, clearing, user, give-up and floor brokerage fees, or shall
reimburse SSB for all such fees previously paid by SSB on behalf of the
Partnership. This fee may be increased or decreased at any time at SSB’s
discretion upon notice to the Partnership.



          Except as specifically provided in this Amendment No. 1, all terms of the Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect after the adoption hereof.




          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed for and on behalf of the undersigned as
of March 1, 2000.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	SMITH BARNEY WESTPORT FUTURES FUND L.P.	 	SALOMON SMITH BARNEY INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By: Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	        (General Partner)

	 	By:
	 	/s/ David J. Vogel
 

Name: David J. Vogel
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Title: Executive Vice President	 	 






	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ David J. Vogel
 

David J. Vogel 

President and Director
THOMAS A. FORTESCUE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-5114

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 1, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Hamilton County.

Andrew J. Decker, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                          5

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                                          2,664
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  40,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               43,601
<PP&E>                                                      1,893,782
<DEPRECIATION>                                                500,304
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              1,437,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         603,453
<BONDS>                                                     2,796,931
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                       16,800
<OTHER-SE>                                                 (1,980,105)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                1,437,079
<SALES>                                                       406,792
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              406,792
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            1,888,794
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             86,268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (1,568,270)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (1,568,270)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (1,568,270)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                     (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (0.10)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Alton L. Boynton,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
November 23, 2009





/s/
      Alton L. BoyntonAlton
      L. BoyntonPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive, Financial and Accounting
Officer)
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3343

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the highest rate 

of income tax for corporations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 20, 2003

Mr. COLLINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce 

the highest rate of income tax for corporations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN HIGHEST RATE OF INCOME TAX 

4 FOR CORPORATIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 11(b) of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

7 subparagraphs (C) and (D), by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end 

8 of subparagraph (B), and by inserting after subpargraph 

9 (B) the following new subparagraph: 
2

•HR 3343 IH 

1 ‘‘(C) 30 percent (32 percent in the case of 

2 taxable years beginning in 2004, 2005, or 

3 2006) of so much of the taxable income as ex4 ceeds $75,000.’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

7 December 31, 2003.

Æ
§ 15.208 What are the restrictions on otherwise allowable claims? ( a ) *Money or currency.* Claims may be allowed for loss of money or currency (which includes coin collections) only when lost incident to fire, flood, hurricane, other natural disaster, or by theft from residence (as limited by § 15.206). In incidents of theft from a residence, it must be conclusively shown that the residence was locked at the time of the theft. Reimbursement for loss of money or currency is limited to an amount, which is determined to have been reasonable for the claimant to have had in his or her possession at the time of the loss.
( b ) *Government property.* Claims may only be allowed for property owned by the United States for which the claimant is financially responsible to an agency of the Government other than the Department.
( c ) *Estimate fees.* Claims may include fees paid to obtain estimates of repairs only when it is clear that an estimate could not have been obtained without paying a fee. In that case, the fee may be allowed only in an amount determined to be reasonable in relation to the value of the property or the cost of the repairs.
( d ) *Automobiles and motor vehicles.* Claims may only be allowed for damage to, or loss of automobiles and other motor vehicles if: ( 1 ) Such motor vehicles were required to be used for official Government business (official Government business, as used here, does not include travel, or parking incident thereto, between residence and office, or use of vehicles for the convenience of the owner. However, it does include travel, and parking incident thereto, between a residence and an assigned place of duty specifically authorized or otherwise shown to be permitted by the employee's supervisor as being more advantageous to the Government); or
( 2 ) Shipment of such motor vehicles was being furnished or provided by the Government, subject to the provisions of § 15.210.
#### § 102.10 Where to file.

Except as provided in § 102.33, a charge must be filed with the Regional Director for the Region in which the alleged unfair labor practice has occurred or is occurring. A charge alleging that an unfair labor practice has occurred or is occurring in two or more Regions may be filed with the Regional Director for any of those Regions.
#### § 16.306 Review by the Secretary.

The Secretary, for purposes of this subsection, means the Secretary of Labor or a person, board or other organizational unit authorized to perform the review function. Either the applicant or agency counsel may seek review of the recommended decision on the fee application, or the Secretary may decide to review the decision on his or her own initiative, in accordance with the Department of Labor's regular review procedures. If neither the applicant nor agency counsel seeks review and the Secretary does not take review on his or her own initiative, the adjudicative officer's decision on the application shall become a final decision of the Department 45 days after it is issued. If review is taken, the Secretary will issue a final decision on the application or remand the application to the adjudicative officer for further proceedings.
#### § 16.305 Decision.

The adjudicative officer shall issue a recommended decision on the application which shall include written findings and conclusions on the applicant's eligibility and status as a prevailing party, and an explanation of the reasons for any difference between the amount requested and the amount awarded. The decisions shall also include, if at issue, findings on whether the agency's position was substantially justified, whether the applicant unduly protracted the proceedings, or whether special circumstances make an award unjust. If the applicant has sought an award against more than one agency, the decision shall allocate responsibility for payment of any award made among the agencies, and shall explain the reasons for the allocation made.
§ 1404.19 Arbitration process. ( a ) Once notified of the expedited case appointment by OA, the arbitrator must contact the parties within seven (7) calendar days.
( b ) The parties and the arbitrator must attempt to schedule a hearing within 30 days of the appointment date.
( c ) Absent mutual agreement, all hearings will be concluded within one day. No transcripts of the proceedings will be made and the filing of post-hearing briefs will not be allowed.
( d ) All awards must be completed within seven (7) working days from the hearing. These awards are expected to be brief and concise, and to not require extensive written opinion or research time.
#### K-Mart Corporation, Respondent, v Caruthersville Corp., Appellant.

[701 NYS2d 764]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), entered August 20, 1998.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Alpert, J., at the Supreme Court. Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Thompson and Joy, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of NEON Systems, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian D. Helman, the principalfinancial and accounting officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.(S)1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| February 14,  2005                                                    |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                  |
| /s/ Brian D.  Helman                                                  |   |
|                                                                  |
| Brian D. Helman                                                       |
|                                                                  |
| Chief Financial  Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) |

 

1

----
#### § 1450.18 Purpose.

This subpart provides the standards to be followed by FMCS in implementing 5 U.S.C. 5514 to recover a debt from the pay account of an FMCS employee, and establishes procedural guidelines to recover debts when the employee's creditor and paying agencies are not the same.
§ 65.70 Aircraft dispatcher certification courses: Records. ( a ) The operator of an aircraft dispatcher course must maintain a record for each student, including a chronological log of all instructors, subjects covered, and course examinations and results. The record must be retained for at least 3 years after graduation. The course operator also must prepare, for its records, and transmit to the Administrator not later than January 31 of each year, a report containing the following information for the previous year: ( 1 ) The names of all students who graduated, together with the results of their aircraft dispatcher certification courses.
( 2 ) The names of all the students who failed or withdrew, together with the results of their aircraft dispatcher certification courses or the reasons for their withdrawal.
( b ) Each student who successfully completes the approved aircraft dispatcher certification course must be given a written statement of graduation, which is valid for 90 days. After 90 days, the course operator may revalidate the graduation certificate for an additional 90 days if the course operator determines that the student remains proficient in the subject areas listed in appendix A of this part.