alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SALEM (city) v HARDING

Ohio Supreme Court

No. 21359.

Decided Oct. 23, 1929

Syllabus by

MARSHALL, CJ.

MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS

(360 P4g) Where water mains which supply domestic water to a city are laid in the same street in which a sewer is constructed and parallel thereto, the officers and agents of the city in making changes in the sewer must exercise ordinary care to prevent contamination of the water supply.

(360 G) The construction of sewers by a city is the exercise of a governmental function, and a board of health in the discharge of its duties acts in the exercise of the police power of the state, but in the maintenance or destruction of a sewer or any part thereof the city is nevertheless liable for the negligence of its board of health whereby a nuisance is created.

(360 P4k) A munieipalitv which supplies water to its citizens for domestic use is not a guarantor that the water is fit for such use but is only held to the exercise of ordinary care.

Kinkade, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Richard Wayne, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Crossing PreferredCorporation (the “registrant”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) [Not applicable]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       Date: May 10, 2006 By:      /s/ Richard Wayne           Richard Wayne    *President (Principal Executive Officer)*  
24
# EUR-Lex - 31998D0481 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31998D0481

**98/481/EC: Council Decision of 20 July 1998 approving the external auditors of the European Central Bank **

*
Official Journal L 216 , 04/08/1998 P. 0007 - 0007 *

COUNCIL DECISION of 20 July 1998 approving the external auditors of the European Central Bank (98/481/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank and in particular to Article 27.1 thereof,

Having regard to the Recommendation of the Governing Council of the European Central Bank (hereinafter referred to as the 'ECB`) of 19 June 1998,

Whereas the accounts of the ECB and national central banks are to be audited by independent external auditors recommended by the Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union;

Whereas the Governing Council of the ECB has recommended Coopers and Lybrand as the external auditors of the ECB,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Coopers and Lybrand are hereby approved as the external auditors of the ECB.

Article 2

This Decision shall be notified to the ECB.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Done at Brussels, 20 July 1998.

For the Council

The President

W. MOLTERER
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4556 

To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through 

the Director of the Indian Health Service, to acquire private land to 

facilitate access to the Desert Sage Youth Wellness Center in Hemet, 

California, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2020 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services, 

acting through the Director of the Indian Health Service, 

to acquire private land to facilitate access to the Desert 

Sage Youth Wellness Center in Hemet, California, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACCESS ROAD FOR DESERT SAGE YOUTH 

4 WELLNESS CENTER. 

5 (a) ACQUISITION OF LAND.— 

6 (1) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of Health 

7 and Human Services, acting through the Director of 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4556 IS

1 the Indian Health Service, is authorized to acquire, 

2 from willing sellers, the land in Hemet, California, 

3 upon which is located a dirt road known as ‘‘Best 

4 Road’’, beginning at the driveway of the Desert Sage 

5 Youth Wellness Center at Faure Road and extending 

6 to the junction of Best Road and Sage Road. 

7 (2) COMPENSATION.—The Secretary shall pay 

8 fair market value for the land authorized to be ac9 quired under paragraph (1). Fair market value shall 

10 be determined— 

11 (A) using Uniform Appraisal Standards 

12 for Federal Land Acquisitions; and 

13 (B) by an appraiser acceptable to the Sec14 retary and the owners of the land to be ac15 quired. 

16 (3) ADDITIONAL RIGHTS.—In addition to the 

17 land referred to in paragraph (1), the Secretary is 

18 authorized to acquire, from willing sellers, land or 

19 interests in land as reasonably necessary to con20 struct and maintain the road as required by sub21 section (b). 

22 (b) CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ROAD.— 

23 (1) CONSTRUCTION.—After the Secretary ac24 quires the land pursuant to subsection (a), the Sec25 retary shall construct on that land a paved road that 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4556 IS

1 is generally located over Best Road to facilitate ac2 cess to the Desert Sage Youth Wellness Center in 

3 Hemet, California. 

4 (2) MAINTENANCE.—The Secretary— 

5 (A) shall maintain and manage the road 

6 constructed pursuant to paragraph (1); or 

7 (B) enter into an agreement with Riverside 

8 County, California, to own, maintain and man9 age the road constructed pursuant to paragraph 

10 (1). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection with the Annual Report of FTS Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief
Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company, certifies,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 3(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



                       /s/  Scott  Gallagher
                       -----------------------------
                       By:  Scott  Gallagher
                       Chief  Executive  Officer
                       July  18,  2005


                       /s/  Linda  Ehlen
                       -----------------------------
                       By:  Linda  Ehlen
                       Chief  Financial  Officer
                       July  18,  2005
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 27, 2023

NO. 03

- 23

- 00243

- CV

S. S. F. , Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY

BEFO RE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the order terminating parental rights signed by the tr i a l court on April 4,

2023

. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was

no reversible error in the order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms t he trial court’s terminati o n order

.

Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
#### § 1202.4 Secret ballot.

In conducting such investigation, the Board is authorized to take a secret ballot of the employees involved, or to utilize any other appropriate method of ascertaining the names of their duly designated and authorized representatives in such manner as shall insure the choice of representatives by the employees without interference, influence, or coercion exercised by the carrier. Except in unusual or extraordinary circumstances, in a secret ballot the Board shall determine the choice of representative based on the majority of valid ballots cast.

[75 FR 26088, June 10, 2010]
Exhibit 21.1




           SUBSIDIARIES OF GRAHAM PACKAGING HOLDINGS COMPANY

Name:                                   Jurisdiction and Type of Formation:
_____                                   ___________________________________

Graham Packaging Company, L.P.          Delaware limited partnership

GPC Capital Corp. I                     Delaware corporation

GPC Capital Corp. II                    Delaware corporation

GPC OPCO GP LLC                         Delaware limited liability company

GPC Sub GP LLC                          Delaware limited liability company

Graham Packaging Canada Limited         Ontario corporation

Graham Packaging France Partners        Pennsylvania general partnership

Graham Packaging France, S.A.S.         French corporation

Graham Packaging Italy, S.r.L.          Italian limited liability company

LIDO Plast-Graham SRL                   Argentine limited liability company

Societa Imballagi Plastici, S.r.L.      Italian limited liability company

Graham Packaging Poland, L.P.           Pennsylvania limited partnership

Masko Graham Spolka Z.O.O.              Polish limited liability company

Graham Recycling Company, L.P.          Pennsylvania limited partnership

Graham Packaging Latin America, LLC     Delaware limited liability company

Graham Brasil Participacoes Ltda.       Brazilian limited liability company

Graham Packaging do Brasil              Brazilian corporation
Industria e Comercio S.A.

Graham Packaging U.K. Ltd.              England & Wales corporation

Graham Packaging Deutschland GmbH       German limited liability company

Graham Plastpak Plastik Ambalaj A.S.    Turkish corporation

Graham Packaging Europe S.A.S.          French corporation

Graham Emballages Plastiques S.A.       French corporation

Resin Rio Comercio Ltda.                Brazilian limited liability company

Graham Packaging Argentina S.A.         Argentine corporation

Graham Packaging Company de             Venezuelan corporation
Venezuela, C.A.

Amerpack, S.A.                          Argentine corporation

Dodisa, S.A.                            Argentine corporation

Lido Plast S.A.                         Argentine corporation

Lido Plast San Luis S.A.                Argentine corporation

PlasPET Florida, Ltd.                   Florida limited partnership
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Actuate Corporation (the registrant);
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
  /s/    Peter I. CittadiniPeter I. CittadiniPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### § 100.621 When collection action may be terminated or suspended.

The NLRB may suspend or terminate collection action on a claim not in excess of the monetary limitation of $100,000 or such other amount as the Attorney General may direct, exclusive of interest, penalties, and administrative costs, after deducting the amount of partial payments or collections, if any, in accordance with the standards and reasons set forth in 31 CFR part 903.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that closed meetings of the Department of Defense Wage Committee will be held on June 6, 2000, June 13, 2000, June 20, 2000, and June 27, 2000, 2000, at 10 a.m. in Room A105, the Nash Building, 1400 Key Boulevard, Rosslyn, Virginia.

Under the provisions of section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, the Department of Defense has determined that the meetings meet the criteria to close meetings to the public because the matters to be considered are related to internal rules and practices of the Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered were obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee that the data will be held in confidence.

However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to submit material in writing to the chairman concerning matters believed to be deserving of the Committee's attention.

Additional information concerning the meetings maybe obtained by writing to the Chairman, Department of Defense Wage Committee, 4000 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000.

Dated: May 8, 2000.

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-12067  Filed 5-12-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Capital Crossing
Preferred Corporation (the Company) for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned,
Richard Wayne, President of the Company and Edward F. Mehm, Treasurer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of his knowledge, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. Certification Each undersigned officer of Capital Crossing Preferred Corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies that the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is
provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation
S-K (Item 601(b)(32)) promulgated under the Exchange Act. In accordance with
clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification shall not be deemed (i)
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to
the liability of that section or (ii) to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except
to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. Date: May 13, 2005
    
    
    By:
    /s/ Richard WayneRichard WaynePresident (Principal Executive Officer)Date: May 13, 2005
    
    
    By:
    /s/ Edward F. MehmEdward F. MehmTreasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of NEON Systems, Inc, (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian D. Helman, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as
adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Brian D. Helman
-------------------

Brian D. Helman

Chief Financial Officer

February 12, 2003

                                       32
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Centracan Incorporated, a Florida
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Ken Roberts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the
best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company, and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 /s/ Ken RobertsKen
      RobertsChief
      Financial OfficerDecember
      18, 2009
§ 135.143 General requirements. ( a ) No person may operate an aircraft under this part unless that aircraft and its equipment meet the applicable regulations of this chapter.
( b ) Except as provided in § 135.179, no person may operate an aircraft under this part unless the required instruments and equipment in it have been approved and are in an operable condition.
( c ) ATC transponder equipment installed within the time periods indicated below must meet the performance and environmental requirements of the following TSO's: ( 1 ) *Through January 1, 1992:* ( i ) Any class of TSO-C74b or any class of TSO-C74c as appropriate, provided that the equipment was manufactured before January 1, 1990; or
( ii ) The appropriate class of TSO-C112 (Mode S).
( 2 ) *After January 1, 1992:* The appropriate class of TSO-C112 (Mode S). For purposes of paragraph (c)(2) of this section, “installation” does not include— ( i ) Temporary installation of TSO-C74b or TSO-C74c substitute equipment, as appropriate, during maintenance of the permanent equipment;
( ii ) Reinstallation of equipment after temporary removal for maintenance; or
( iii ) For fleet operations, installation of equipment in a fleet aircraft after removal of the equipment for maintenance from another aircraft in the same operator's fleet.
[Doc. No. 16097, 43 FR 46783, Oct. 10, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 135-22, 52 FR 3392, Feb. 3, 1987]
#### AMCHANITZKY v. UNITED STATES

[81 C. Cls. 409; 296 U. S. 598]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court October 14, 1935.
#### §§ 91.148-91.149 [Reserved]
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-104155, 333-87462, 333-75459, 333-87460,
333-75403, 333-85977, 333-91147) and Form S-3 (No. 333-86174) of Penton Media,
Inc of our report dated March 21, 2006 relating to the financial statements,
which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
March 21, 2006