alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4161 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4161

      To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for 
inadmissibility for certain aliens seeking citizenship for children by 
       giving birth in the United States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 2, 2020

Mrs. Blackburn (for herself and Mrs. Loeffler) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for 
inadmissibility for certain aliens seeking citizenship for children by 
       giving birth in the United States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ban Birth Tourism Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. INADMISSIBILITY FOR ALIENS SEEKING CITIZENSHIP FOR CHILDREN BY 
              GIVING BIRTH IN THE UNITED STATES.

    Section 212(a)(10) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1182(a)(10)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(F) Aliens seeking citizenship for children by 
                giving birth in the united states.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Any alien seeking 
                        admission as a nonimmigrant under section 
                        101(a)(15)(B) for the primary purpose of 
                        obtaining United States citizenship for a child 
                        by giving birth to the child in the United 
                        States is inadmissible.
                            ``(ii) Rule of construction.--Nothing in 
                        this subparagraph may be construed to render 
                        inadmissible an alien seeking legitimate 
                        medical treatment relating to childbirth if 
                        obtaining citizenship for the child is not the 
                        primary purpose for seeking admission.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 61.97 Aeronautical knowledge. ( a ) *General.* A person who applies for a recreational pilot certificate must receive and log ground training from an authorized instructor or complete a home-study course on the aeronautical knowledge areas of paragraph (b) of this section that apply to the aircraft category and class rating sought.
( b ) *Aeronautical knowledge areas.* ( 1 ) Applicable Federal Aviation Regulations of this chapter that relate to recreational pilot privileges, limitations, and flight operations;
( 2 ) Accident reporting requirements of the National Transportation Safety Board;
( 3 ) Use of the applicable portions of the “Aeronautical Information Manual” and FAA advisory circulars;
( 4 ) Use of aeronautical charts for VFR navigation using pilotage with the aid of a magnetic compass;
( 5 ) Recognition of critical weather situations from the ground and in flight, windshear avoidance, and the procurement and use of aeronautical weather reports and forecasts;
( 6 ) Safe and efficient operation of aircraft, including collision avoidance, and recognition and avoidance of wake turbulence;
( 7 ) Effects of density altitude on takeoff and climb performance;
( 8 ) Weight and balance computations;
( 9 ) Principles of aerodynamics, powerplants, and aircraft systems;
( 10 ) Stall awareness, spin entry, spins, and spin recovery techniques, if applying for an airplane single-engine rating;
( 11 ) Aeronautical decision making and judgment; and
( 12 ) Preflight action that includes— ( i ) How to obtain information on runway lengths at airports of intended use, data on takeoff and landing distances, weather reports and forecasts, and fuel requirements; and
( ii ) How to plan for alternatives if the planned flight cannot be completed or delays are encountered.
[Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16298, Apr. 4, 1997; Amdt. 61-103, 62 FR 40902, July 30, 1997]
[No. 47192-9-I.

Division One.

December 9, 2002.]

#### Delta Development and Investment Company, *Respondent,*v. Bob Hsiyuan Yeh, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-2-18193-1, Michael J. Fox, J., entered July 11 and August 23, 2000. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Becker, C.J., concurred in by Grosse and Schindler, JJ.
Exhibit 23.2

LONQUIST & CO. LLC

May 7, 2010

Contango Oil & Gas
Company

3700 Buffalo Speedway, Suite 960

Houston, Texas 77098

Re:    Contango Oil & Gas Company, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

Gentlemen:

The firm of
Lonquist & Co. LLC consents to the use of its name and to the use of its projections for Contango Oil & Gas Companys Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenue in Contangos Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2010.

Lonquist & Co. LLC has no interests in Contango Oil & Gas Company or in any affiliated companies
or subsidiaries and is not to receive any such interest as payment for such reports and has no director, officer, or employee otherwise connected with Contango Oil & Gas Company. Contango Oil & Gas Company does not employ us on a
contingent basis.

Yours very truly,



|                         
|-------------------------
|LONQUIST & CO. LLC       
|                         
|/s/ Richard R. Lonquist  
|RICHARD R. LONQUIST, P.E.
#### BROSIOUS v STATE

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9797.

Decided March 25, 1929

W A Moran, Cleveland, for Brosious.

S O Hirstius, Cleveland, for State.

VICKERY, PJ.

Upon what basis the judgment of conviction could be maintained in this case is rather difficult to understand. The statute under which this affidavit and complaint was framed relates to the sale of merchandise, securities or service, and if there is any false statement contained in any such .advertisement the party is violating. the statute, but an examination of the advertisement in this case in which it is claimed a false statement was contained, shows that the party advertising did not want to sell anything but he wanted to buy the services of an agent and he entered into a contract with the agent to pay him a certain amount of money, which he failed to pay.

When this case came before the Municipal Court a demurrer was filed to this affidavit, for the reason that it did not state an offense. That demurrer was overruled and the state proceeded to put on its evidence which showed the state of facts which I have outlined, and after the evidence was all in, proper proceedings were taken to protect the right of the defendant below and exceptions were taken to the ruling of the court. A motion was made to discharge the defendant for lack of evidence, which motion was overruled and an exception taken, and error is prosecuted to this court on the ground that the affidavit did not state a crime or misdemeanor or an offense within thé meaning of the statute, and that the evidence fell short of showing, any violation of the law.

We are constrained to come to the conclusion that the court should have sustained this demurrer.

The judgment of conviction was, therefore, clearly wrong, and the judgment will be reversed and the plaintiff in error discharged.

Sullivan and Levine, JJ, concur.
§ 406.177 Petition to reconsider or modify a final decision and order of the FAA decisionmaker on appeal. ( a ) *General.* Any party may petition the FAA decisionmaker to reconsider or modify a final decision and order issued by the FAA decisionmaker on appeal from an initial decision. A party must file a petition to reconsider or modify with the Federal Docket Management System not later than 30 days after service of the FAA decisionmaker's final decision and order on appeal and must serve a copy of the petition on each party. The FAA decisionmaker will not reconsider or modify an initial decision and order issued by an administrative law judge that has not been appealed by any party to the FAA decisionmaker.
( b ) *Contents.* A party must state briefly and specifically the alleged errors in the final decision and order on appeal, the relief sought by the party, and the grounds that support, the petition to reconsider or modify. ( 1 ) If the petition is based, in whole or in part, on allegations regarding the consequences of the FAA decisionmaker's decision, the party must describe these allegations and must describe, and support, the basis for the allegations.
( 2 ) If the petition is based, in whole or in part, on new material not previously raised in the proceedings, the party must set forth the new material and include affidavits of prospective witnesses and authenticated documents that would be introduced in support of the new material. The party must explain, in detail, why the new material was not discovered through due diligence prior to the hearing.
( c ) *Repetitious and frivolous petition.* The FAA decisionmaker will not consider a repetitious or frivolous petition. The FAA decisionmaker may summarily dismiss any repetitious or frivolous petition to reconsider or modify.
( d ) *Reply to petition.* Any other party may reply to a petition to reconsider or modify, not later than 10 days after service of the petition on that party, by filing a reply. A party must serve a copy of the reply on each party.
( e ) *Effect of filing petition.* Unless otherwise ordered by the FAA decisionmaker, filing a petition under this section stays the effective date of the FAA decisionmaker's final decision and order on appeal, and tolls the time allowed for judicial review.
( f ) *FAA decisionmaker's decision on petition.* The FAA decisionmaker may affirm, modify, or reverse the final decision and order on appeal, or may remand the case for any proceedings that the FAA decisionmaker determines may be necessary.
[Doc. No. FAA-2001-8607, 66 FR 2180, Jan. 10, 2001, as amended at 72 FR 68477, Dec. 5, 2007]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1033
AMINATA BUBU KAMARA, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A70-679-571) Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 25, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Lindsay L. Chichester, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Aminata Bubu Kamara, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying as untimely and numerically barred her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. SeeIn re: Kamara , No. A70-679-571 (B.I.A. Dec. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
§ 102.173 Relation to other collection efforts. ( a ) Tax refund offset is intended to be an administrative collection remedy to be used consistent with IRS requirements for participation in the program, and the costs and benefits of pursuing alternative remedies when the tax refund offset program is readily available. To the extent practical, the requirements of the program will be met by merging IRS requirements into the Agency's overall requirements for delinquent debt collection.
( b ) As appropriate, debts of an individual debtor of $100 or more will be reported to a consumer or commercial credit reporting agency before referral for tax refund offset.
( c ) Debts owed by individuals will be screened for administrative offset potential using the most current information reasonably available to the Agency, and will not be referred for tax refund offset where administrative offset potential is found to exist.
[62 FR 55166, Oct. 23, 1997, as amended at 82 FR 11785, Feb. 24, 2017]
§ 91.211 Supplemental oxygen. ( a ) *General.* No person may operate a civil aircraft of U.S. registry— ( 1 ) At cabin pressure altitudes above 12,500 feet (MSL) up to and including 14,000 feet (MSL) unless the required minimum flight crew is provided with and uses supplemental oxygen for that part of the flight at those altitudes that is of more than 30 minutes duration;
( 2 ) At cabin pressure altitudes above 14,000 feet (MSL) unless the required minimum flight crew is provided with and uses supplemental oxygen during the entire flight time at those altitudes; and
( 3 ) At cabin pressure altitudes above 15,000 feet (MSL) unless each occupant of the aircraft is provided with supplemental oxygen.
( b ) *Pressurized cabin aircraft.* ( 1 ) No person may operate a civil aircraft of U.S. registry with a pressurized cabin— ( i ) At flight altitudes above flight level 250 unless at least a 10-minute supply of supplemental oxygen, in addition to any oxygen required to satisfy paragraph (a) of this section, is available for each occupant of the aircraft for use in the event that a descent is necessitated by loss of cabin pressurization; and
( ii ) At flight altitudes above flight level 350 unless one pilot at the controls of the airplane is wearing and using an oxygen mask that is secured and sealed and that either supplies oxygen at all times or automatically supplies oxygen whenever the cabin pressure altitude of the airplane exceeds 14,000 feet (MSL), except that the one pilot need not wear and use an oxygen mask while at or below flight level 410 if there are two pilots at the controls and each pilot has a quick-donning type of oxygen mask that can be placed on the face with one hand from the ready position within 5 seconds, supplying oxygen and properly secured and sealed.
( 2 ) Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, if for any reason at any time it is necessary for one pilot to leave the controls of the aircraft when operating at flight altitudes above flight level 350, the remaining pilot at the controls shall put on and use an oxygen mask until the other pilot has returned to that crewmember's station.
No Surface Occupancy,

Controlled Surface Use,

Timing Limits and 

No Lease Discretionary / 

No Lease Non-discretionary

Alternative A

0 2 4 8 12 16 20

Miles

Map 54

Harlowton Roundup

T7NT5N

Pompeys

 Pillar

Big Timber

Billings

T2 Columbus S

Bridger

T8S

R18E R29E Montana

R103W R93W Wyoming

T

57N

Billings

Field 

Office

Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings

Field 

Office

Ü

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

94

90

90

Map scale 1:900,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in May 2015

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Legend

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

Interstate

Public Lands 

 Survey System

Highway

^ Towns

No Surface Occupancy

Controlled Surface Use

Time Limits

No Lease Discretionary

No Lease 

 Non-discretionary
**Exhibit 10.5**

 

**AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SUNCOAST BANCORP, INC.**

**OFFICERS’ AND EMPLOYEES’ STOCK OPTION PLAN**

 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE SUNCOAST BANCORP, INC. OFFICERS’ AND EMPLOYEES’ STOCK OPTION PLAN (the “Amendment”) is made effective as of the 11th day of May, 2004. 

 

W I T N E S S E T H   T H A T: 

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and the shareholders of SunCoast Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) have authorized, adopted and approved aOfficers’ and Employees’ Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”); and 

 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects; and 

 

WHEREAS, the board of directors and the shareholders of the Company have approved the Amendment. 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

 

1. Defined Terms. All terms used in this Amendment which are definedin the Plan shall have the meanings specified in the Plan, unless specifically defined herein. 

 

2. Amendment of Section 4.1. Section 4.1 of the Plan shall be amended to provide that, subject to adjustment pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.3 of the Plan, the number of shares of Stock which may beissued and sold under the Plan pursuant to Stock Option Agreements shall not exceed Fifty Six Thousand (56,000) shares. 

 

3. Effect of Amendment. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the terms, covenants, and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full forceand effect. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused thisAmendment to be duly executed by its officer thereunto duly authorized, effective as of the date first above written.
#### ROBERT M. HENDRICKS v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. 41984.

Decided June 3, 1935]

*Miss Stella*Akin, with whom was *Mr. Assistant Attorney General George G. Sweeney,*for the plea.

*Mr. Robert M. Hendricks, pro se,*opposed.

Pee Ctjbiam :

The plaintiff in this case misapprehends the jurisdiction of this court with respect to the claim prosecuted by him. Matters of the sort involved in this suit are not turned over to the Court of Claims. Plaintiffs are entitled under section 145 of the Judicial Code to file and prosecute such claims within six years from the date such right of action accrued. (See *Section 156 of the Judicial Code.)*The statute of limitations applicable to this court is jurisdictional. *United States*v. *Wardwell,*112 U. S. 48, and the statute begins to run from the date when suit may first be brought upon the claim. *Rice*v. *United States,*122 U. S. 611. The fact that the claim was held in the office of the Commandant of the Marine Corps, Washington, D. C., if such is the fact, does not toll the statute of limitations during such time. Plaintiff was honorably discharged from the *610Marine Corps on March 10, 1928, and this suit was not filed until June 3, 1932, more than nine years thereafter.

Defendant’s plea to the jurisdiction of the court is sustained and the petition is dismissed. It is so ordered.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1 – CEO Certification**








**SATELLITE
      NEWSPAPERS CORP.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUNT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the amended Annual Report of Satellite Newspapers Corp. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy
      Piceni, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as
      added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
      for
      the period covered by the Report.








By:
      /s/ Roy Piceni


Roy
      Piceni, President





April
      17,
      2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
      or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to Satellite Newspapers Corp., and will be retained by Satellite
      Newspapers Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3296] 

# DEPARTMENT:

United States Department of State. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 [79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459], the Foreign Affairs Reform and                               ( print page 26870)                            Restructuring Act of 1998 [112 Stat. 2681                         *et seq.*], Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999 [64 FR 56014], and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended by Delegation of Authority No. 236-1 of November 9, 1999, I hereby determine that an additional object to be included in the exhibit, “1900: Art at the Crossroads,” imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, is of cultural significance. The object will be imported pursuant to a loan agreement with a foreign lender. I also determine that the temporary exhibition or display of the additional object at the Guggenheim Museum, New York, NY, from on or about May 18, 2000, to on or about September 10, 2000, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of all exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, 202/619-5997, and the address is Room 700, United States Department of State, 301 4th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: May 2, 2000. 

William B. Bader, 

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affair, United States Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 00-11557 Filed 5-8-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P