alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4684 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4684

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 440 Arapahoe Street in Thermopolis, Wyoming, as the ``Robert L. 
                          Brown Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2020

Mr. Enzi (for himself and Mr. Barrasso) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 440 Arapahoe Street in Thermopolis, Wyoming, as the ``Robert L. 
                          Brown Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROBERT L. BROWN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 440 Arapahoe Street in Thermopolis, Wyoming, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Robert L. Brown Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert L. 
Brown Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 65.129 Performance standards. No certificated parachute rigger may— ( a ) Pack, maintain, or alter any parachute unless he is rated for that type;
( b ) Pack a parachute that is not safe for emergency use;
( c ) Pack a parachute that has not been thoroughly dried and aired;
( d ) Alter a parachute in a manner that is not specifically authorized by the Administrator or the manufacturer;
( e ) Pack, maintain, or alter a parachute in any manner that deviates from procedures approved by the Administrator or the manufacturer of the parachute; or
( f ) Exercise the privileges of his certificate and type rating unless he understands the current manufacturer's instructions for the operation involved and has— ( 1 ) Performed duties under his certificate for at least 90 days within the preceding 12 months; or
( 2 ) Shown the Administrator that he is able to perform those duties.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 94 (Monday, May 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12075]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive Patent License; Richard 
Scheps

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of a 
prospective license to Richard Scheps to the Government-owned invention 
described as ``INTERNALLY FOLDED SCALABLE LASER''.

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file 
written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later 
than July 14, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with the Office of Patent 
Counsel, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, D0012, 53510 
Silvergate Ave., Rm 103, San Diego, CA 92152-5765. Kindly reference 
N.C. 73421 in all correspondence directed to this matter.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Harvey Fendelman, Patent Counsel, 
Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, Code D0012, 53510 Silvergate 
Ave., Rm 103, San Diego, CA 92152-5765, telephone (619) 553-3001.

    Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

    Dated: April 26, 2000.
J.L. Roth,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-12075 Filed 5-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
ex104.htm


    Exhibit
10.4

     

    AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

    


    This
amendment to Executive Employment Agreement is executed this date November 10,
2009 by and between Gen2Media Corporation (“Company”) and Ian McDaniel
(“Employee”).

    


     

    
      	
              1.  

            	
              This
      agreement amends the Executive Employment Agreement between the parties
      dated May 1, 2008 as amended November 2, 2008
    (“Agreement”).

            


    

     

    


     

    
      	
              2.  

            	
              The
      Agreement is hereby amended to provide for a reduced base salary and the
      provision of restricted stock for that reduction.  This
      Amendment shall also settle all outstanding obligations to the Employee
      for shortfalls in contracted compensation during the year ended June 30,
      2009.

            


    

     

    


     

    
      	
              3.  

            	
              The
      base salary shall be $65,000 through April 30, 2010, $75,000 from May1,
      2010 through April 30, 2011 and $85,000 from May 1, 2011 through April 30,
      2012.

            


    

     

    


     

    
      	
              4.  

            	
              The
      number of restricted shares awarded shall vest under the following
      schedule and remain restricted for a two year period following the vesting
      schedule as follows:  200,000 vest immediately; 29,636 per
      quarter over the remaining life of the
contract.

            


    

     

    


     

    
      	
              5.  

            	
              Other
      than specifically amended hereby, all other terms and provisions of the
      Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.

            


    

     

    


     

    Gen2Media
Corporation:                                                                           Employee:

     

    


     

    


     

    _________________________                                                             __________________________

     

    Mark
Argenti, Chairman and
CEO                                                            Ian
McDaniel, Chief Information Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1197]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

AGENCY:  Office of Admissions, HQ USAF Academy, Department of the Air 
Force, DoD.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995, the Office of Admissions announces a proposed public 
information collection and seeks public comment on the provisions 
thereof. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection 
of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions 
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; (b) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed information collection; (c) Ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) Ways 
to minimize the burden of the information collection on respondents, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology.

DATES:  Consideration will be given to all comments received by March 
20, 2000.

ADDRESSES:  Written comments and recommendations on the proposed 
information collection should be sent to Office of Admissions, 2304 
Cadet Drive, Suite 236, USAF Academy, CO 80840. Point of contact is Ms. 
Patricia Marinski, 719-333-3226.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on this 
proposed information collection or to obtain a copy of the proposed and 
associated collection instruments, please write to the above address.
    Title and Associated Form: USAF Academy Writing Sample, USAFA Form 
0-878.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
to obtain data on candidate's background and aptitude in determining 
eligibility and selection to the Air Force Academy.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Annual Burden Hours: 4,100.
    Number of Respondents: 4,100.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Average Burden Per Response: 60 minutes.
    Frequency: 1.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Summary of Information Collection

    The information collected on this form is required by 10 U.S.C. 
9346. The respondents are students who are applying for admission to 
the United States Air Force Academy. Each student's background and 
aptitude is reviewed to determine eligibility.
    If the information on this form is not collected, the individual 
cannot be considered for admittance to the Air Force Academy.

Janet A. Long,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-1197 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-U
Exhibit
13.2





PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Annual Report of Ultrapetrol (Bahamas) Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Leonard J. Hoskinson, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




This
certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not
for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.




Date:
November 25, 2009





/s/ Leonard J.
Hoskinson


Leonard
J. Hoskinson


Principal
Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12185]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Notice Seeking Exemption Under Section 312 of the Small Business 
Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that TD Origen Fund, L.P. (``TD Origen''), 
150 Washington Avenue, Suite 201, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501, a Federal 
Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended 
(``the Act''), TD Javelin Capital Fund, LP (``TD Javelin''), 2850 
Cahaba Road, Suite 240, Birmingham, Alabama 35223, a Federal Licensee 
under the Act, TD Javelin Capital Fund II, LP (``TD Javelin II''), 2850 
Cahaba Road, Suite 240, Birmingham, Alabama 35223, a Federal Licensee 
under the Act, and TD Lighthouse Capital Fund, LP (``TD Lighthouse'', 
and together with TD Javelin, TD Javelin II, and TD Origen, the 
``Funds''), 303 Detroit Street, Suite 301, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, 
an applicant for a Federal license under the Act, in connection with 
the financing of a small concern, are seeking an exemption under 
section 312 of the Act and section 107.730, Financings which Constitute 
Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (``SBA'') 
rules and regulations (13 CFR 107.730 (2000)). The Funds propose to 
provide equity financing to TransMolecular, Inc. (``TMI''), 2850 Cahaba 
Road, Suite 240, Birmingham, Alabama 35223. The financing is 
contemplated for product development and working capital.
    The financing is brought within the purview of Sec. 107.730(a)(1) 
of the Regulations because TD Javelin, an Associate of the Funds, 
currently owns greater than 10 percent of TMI and therefore TMI is 
considered an Associate of each of the Funds as defined in Sec. 107.50 
of the regulations.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator for 
Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW; 
Washington, DC 20416.

    Dated: April 26, 2000.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 00-12185 Filed 5-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

MARLAND MOORE, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 401 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 2nd day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Centracan  Incorporated,  a   Florida
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the year ended March 31, 2008,   as
filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  Ken Roberts,  Chief  Financial Officer of the Company,  certifies to
the  best  of  his   knowledge,  pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section  13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all
              material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and   result   of
              operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement  required by Section  906  has  been
provided to the Company,  and will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/Ken Roberts
-----------------------
Ken Roberts
Chief Financial Officer
May 29, 2008
# EUR-Lex - 31995D0062 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995D0062

**95/62/EC: Commission Decision of 6 March 1995 approving the programme for the eradication of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis in Austria (¹) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 055 , 11/03/1995 P. 0045 - 0045 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 6 March 1995 approving the programme for the eradication of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis in Austria (Only the German text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (95/62/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 64/432/EEC of 26 June 1964 on animal health problems affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 9 thereof,

Whereas an eradication programme was commenced in Austria for infectious bovine rhinotracheitis in 1990;

Whereas in accordance with Article 9 (2) of Directive 64/432/EEC the Commission has examined the programme; whereas it meets the criteria laid down in Article 9 (1) of the said Directive and can therefore be approved;

Whereas by letter dated 5 December 1994, Austria has submitted information on its eradication programme for infectious bovine rhinotracheitis;

Whereas the programme should allow infectious bovine rhinotracheitis to be eradicated from Austria in the future; whereas the situation concerning this disease in Austria shall be reviewed within two years;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The programme for the eradication of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis from Austria is hereby approved for a period of two years.

Article 2

Austria shall bring into force by 1 March 1995 the laws, regulations and administrative provisions for implementing the programme referred to in Article 1.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 March 1995.

Article 4

This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Austria.

Done at Brussels, 6 March 1995.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No 121, 29. 7. 1964, p. 1977/64.
§ 89.525 Labeling. ( a ) No person may produce a standard remote identification unmanned aircraft under § 89.515 unless it displays a label indicating that the unmanned aircraft meets the requirements of this part. The label must be in English and be legible, prominent, and permanently affixed to the unmanned aircraft.
( b ) No person may produce a remote identification broadcast module under § 89.520 unless it displays a label indicating that the equipment meets the requirements of this part. The label must be in English and be legible, prominent, and permanently affixed to the broadcast module.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,330
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      170
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,585
<PP&E>                                          70,105
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,489
<BONDS>                                         45,539
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,889
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,052
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,284
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,715
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,459
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 962
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,020
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,820
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,820
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42


</TABLE>
#### MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. *v.*E. V. NEISSL

5-5958

483 S.W. 2d 188

Opinion delivered July 17, 1972

[Rehearing denied August 28, 1972]

*Smith, Williams, Friday, Eldridge ir Clark,*for appellant.

*Bill Walters,*for appellee.

Lyle Brown, Justice.

A steer owned by appellee was struck and killed by a train operated by appellant’s employees. The jury returned a verdict for actual and double damages and the court fixed an attorney’s fee for appellee. On appeal it is contended that appellant should have been given an instructed verdict. We agree.

The case was submitted to the jury on the sole question of lookout. The only witness testifying regarding lookout was the engineer. That testimony may be briefly and sufficiently abstracted as follows:

> *1091At the time of the accident we were going east from Van Burén and had crossed over Bates Mill Crossing and over the hill. I was traveling thirty miles per hour. The headlight was shining straight ahead and I was watching down the track. I noticed a cow in the edge of the bushes about four car lengths ahead of the train. Four cars are approximately 200 feet. The cow was moving along parallel with the train. Then a car length before I got to it the animal turned angling across the track. When I first saw the cow I gave my whistle several short blasts. With the cow 200 feet down the track when I first saw it, considering the train which I was operating, considering the number of cars which I had on the train, if I had applied the emergency brake as well as the service brake it would have taken 1000 or 1200 feet to have stopped the train safely. If I had hit the brakes the moment I saw the cow I would have still gone eight hundred feet past it.

Where an injury is caused by the operation of a railroad train a prima facie case of negligence is made against the railroad. Of that well known principle we had this to say in *St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.*v. *Cole,*181 Ark. 780, 27 S.W. 2d 992 (1930) where we quoted from the Supreme Court of the United States as set out in *Western & A.R.R. Co.*v. *Henderson,*279 U.S. 639 (1929): “The only legal effect of this inference is to cast upon the railway company the duty of producing some evidence to the contrary. When this is done, the inference is at an end, and the question of negligence is one for the jury upon all the evidence.”

The testimony that the engineer was keeping a lookout, that he was driving at a reasonable rate of speed, and that he could not stop the train in order to avoid killing the animal was not disputed, even by circumstantial evidence.

Reversed and dismissed.