alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 102.157 Definitions. ( a ) The term *administrative offset* means the withholding of money payable by the United States to, or held by the United States on behalf of, a person to satisfy a debt owed the United States by that person.
( b ) The term *debtor* is any person against whom the Board has a claim.
( c ) The term *person* does not include any agency of the United States, or any state or local government.
( d ) The terms *claim* and *debt* are synonymous and interchangeable. They refer to an amount of money or property which has been determined by an appropriate Agency official to be owed to the United States from any person, organization, or entity, except another Federal agency.
( e ) A debt is considered *delinquent* if it has not been paid by the date specified in the Agency's initial demand letter (§ 102.161), unless satisfactory payment arrangements have been made by that date, or if, at any time thereafter, the debtor fails to satisfy the debtor's obligations under a payment agreement with the Agency.
[62 FR 55164, Oct. 23, 1997, as amended at 82 FR 11784, Feb. 24, 2017]
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Americas Power Partners, Inc. (the
Company) hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    
|--------------------
|/s/ Mark A. Margason
|Mark A. Margason    
|October 29, 2004    



19
§ 1215.105 Delivery of user data. ( a ) As a standard service, NASA will provide to the user its data from TDRSS in the form of one or more digital or analog bit streams synchronized to associated clock streams at WSC or GRGT.
( b ) User data-handling requirements beyond WSC or GRGT interface will be provided as a standard service to the user, to the extent that the requirements do not exceed NASA's planned standard communications system. Any additional data transport or handling requirements exceeding NASA's capability will be dealt with as a mission-unique service.
( c ) No storage of the user data is provided in the standard service. NASA will provide short-term temporary recording of data at WSC in the event of a NASA Integrated Services Network (NISN) link outage.
( d ) NASA will provide TDRSS services on a “reasonable efforts” basis, and, accordingly, will not be liable for damages of any kind to the user or third parties for any reason, including, but not limited to, failure to provide agreed-to services. The price for TDRSS services does not include a contingency or premium for any potential damages. The user will assume any risk of damages or obtain insurance to protect against any risk.
[77 FR 6952, Feb. 10, 2012]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4661 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4661

To authorize the President to posthumously award the Medal of Honor to 
    Alwyn C. Cashe for acts of valor during Operation Iraqi Freedom.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 23, 2020

 Mr. Cotton (for himself, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Kaine, 
  Mr. Manchin, Mr. Blumenthal, and Mr. Cruz) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the President to posthumously award the Medal of Honor to 
    Alwyn C. Cashe for acts of valor during Operation Iraqi Freedom.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD MEDAL OF HONOR TO SERGEANT FIRST 
              CLASS ALWYN C. CASHE FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING OPERATION 
              IRAQI FREEDOM.

    (a) Waiver of Time Limitations.--Notwithstanding the time 
limitations specified in section 7274 of title 10, United States Code, 
or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain 
medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President may 
award the Medal of Honor under section 7271 of such title to Sergeant 
First Class Alwyn C. Cashe for the acts of valor described in 
subsection (b).
    (b) Acts of Valor Described.--The acts of valor referred to in 
subsection (a) are the actions of Sergeant First Class Alwyn C. Cashe 
on October 17, 2005, as a member of the Army serving in Iraq in support 
of Operation Iraqi Freedom, for which he was posthumously awarded the 
Silver Star.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 94 (Monday, May 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30975-30976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12105]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Logistics Agency


Membership of the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Senior Executive 
Service (SES) Performance Review Board (PRB)

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of membership--2000 DLA PRB.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of members to the 
Defense Logistics Agency Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance 
Review Board (PRB). The publication of PRB composition is required by 5 
U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB provides fair and impartial review of Senior 
Executive Service performance appraisals and makes recommendations to 
the Director, Defense Logistics Agency, with respect to pay level 
adjustments and performance awards, and other actions related to 
management of the SES cadre.

EFFECTIVE DATES: July 1, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Defense Logistics Agency, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, STE 
2533, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 22060-6221.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Donna Coward, Workforce 
Effectiveness and Development Group, Human Resources, Defense Logistics 
Agency, Department of Defense, (703) 767-6427.

[[Page 30976]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the 
following are the names and titles of DLA career executives appointed 
to serve as members of the SES PRB. Members will serve a 2-year term, 
effective July 1, 2000.
    PRB Chair: Mr. Frank Lotts, Deputy Director, Logistics Operations.
    Members: Ms. Phyllis Campbell, Deputy Commander, Defense 
Distribution Center, Mr. Michael Miller, Executive Director, Program/
Budget Office, Ms. Claudia S. Knott, Executive Director, Electronic 
Business Office.

Gary S. Thurber,
Executive Director, Defense Logistics Agency.
[FR Doc. 00-12105 Filed 5-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3620-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 92 (Thursday, May 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30451-30452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11856]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 which provides opportunity for 
public comment on new or revised data collections, the Railroad 
Retirement Board (RRB) will publish periodic summaries of proposed data 
collections.
    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed information 
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the agency, including whether the information has practical utility; 
(b) the accuracy of the RRB's estimate of the burden of the collection 
of the information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize 
the burden related to

[[Page 30452]]

the collection of information on respondents, including the use of 
automated collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.
    Title and purpose of information collection: Vocational Report; OMB 
3220-0141.
    Section 2 of the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) provides for payment 
of disability annuities to qualified employees and widow(ers). The 
establishment of permanent disability for work in the applicants 
``regular occupation'' or for work in any regular employment is 
prescribed in 20 CFR 220.12 and 220.13 respectively.
    The RRB utilizes Form G-251, Vocational Report, to obtain an 
applicant's work history. This information is used by the RRB to 
determine the effect of a disability on an applicant's ability to work. 
Form G-251 is designed for use with the RRB's disability benefit 
application forms and is provided to all applicants for employee 
disability annuities and to those applicants for a widow(er)'s 
disability annuity who indicate that they have been employed at some 
time. Completion is required to obtain or retain a benefit. One 
response is requested of each respondent.
    The RRB proposed non-burden impacting formatting and editorial 
changes to Form G-251. The completion time for Form G-251 is estimated 
at between thirty and 40 minutes per response. The RRB estimates that 
approximately 6,000 Form G-251's are completed annually.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information or to 
obtain a copy of the information collection justification, forms, and/
or supporting material, please call the RRB Clearance Officer at (312) 
751-3363. Comments regarding the information collection should be 
addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North 
Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092. Written comments should be 
received within 60 days of this notice.

Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-11856 Filed 5-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
#### § 25.117 Climb: general.

Compliance with the requirements of §§ 25.119 and 25.121 must be shown at each weight, altitude, and ambient temperature within the operational limits established for the airplane and with the most unfavorable center of gravity for each configuration.
#### DETTELBACH v WALDORF LAND CO et

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9488.

Decided Feb 11, 1929

Klein & Zaller, Cleveland, for Dettelbach.

Louis H. Wolfe, Cleveland, for Land Co.

PER CURIAM

Our first thought is to express grave doubt whether appeal lies from a ruling, upon such motion; that this motion so ruled on by the Common Pleas court was merely a step in a case but not a chancery case, but waiving it aside since both parties seemingly treat it as an appeal, we can see no .error in the court’s action permitting the amendment of the order of distribution so as to show that the sheriff paid the' taxes. Surely the sheriff was under a duty to pay the same. Equity treats that as done which ought to be done, and the court in the exercise of sound 'discretion was in good conscience bound to permit an omission of an official duty which occurred by an oversight to he corrected in some way. We are of the opinion that our judgment cannot vary from that of the Common Pleas.

A decree will therefore be drawn in the same terms as are contained in the common pleas decree permitting the amendment of the order of distribution.

. Vickery, PJ, Sullivan and Levine, JJ. concur.
#### HESTER v. THE STATE.

(Decided December 16, 1915.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. Wm. E. Fort.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney-General, for the State.

Pelham, P. J.

No transcript having been filed in this court, the cause is affirmed on motion of the Attorney General on certificate.

Thomas, J., not sitting.
CL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0096

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

HARLAN G. VASKA,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to

and including June 18, 2024, within which to prepare, serve, and file the State’s

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

May 14 2024

05/14/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0096
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7725

ERICKY ARNEZZ BOGUES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE 

OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. 

(1:11-cv-02724-CCB)

Submitted: December 13, 2012 Decided: December 19, 2012

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ericky Arnezz Bogues, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Ericky Arnezz Bogues seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Bogues has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
§ 33.1 Applicability. ( a ) This part prescribes airworthiness standards for the issue of type certificates and changes to those certificates, for aircraft engines.
( b ) Each person who applies under part 21 for such a certificate or change must show compliance with the applicable requirements of this part and the applicable requirements of part 34 of this chapter.
[Amdt. 33-7, 41 FR 55474, Dec. 20, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 33-14, 55 FR 32861, Aug. 10, 1990]
EXHIBIT 32.0



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Woronoco Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Cornelius D. Mahoney, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Cornelius D. MahoneyCornelius D. MahoneyChief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2005






34



---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Woronoco Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Debra L. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Debra L. MurphyDebra L. MurphyChief Financial OfficerMay 10, 2005




35
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





In
      connection with the periodic report of Asiamart, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kwan Pui Wong, Chief Financial Officer
      (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, hereby certify
      as
      of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350
      of
      the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.




Date:
                May 20, 2008
            
            /s/
                Kwan Pui WongKwan
                Pui WongChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of Fortune
Entertainment Corporation, that, to his knowledge, the quarterly report of the
company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the company's financial condition and results of operations.


November 21, 2005

/s/ Douglas R. Sanderson
Douglas R. Sanderson, Chief Executive Officer
#### § 91.1503 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of SunCoast Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John S. Wilks, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the report.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                 |  | 
|----- |  | --------------- |  | 
|Date: |  | August 12, 2003 |  | 
|      |  |                 |  |
#### § 1206.3 Age of authorization cards.

Authorizations must be signed and dated in the employee's own handwriting or witnessed mark. No authorizations will be accepted by the National Mediation Board in any employee representation dispute which bear a date prior to one year before the date of the application for the investigation of such dispute.
§ 91.1115 Inoperable instruments and equipment. ( a ) No person may take off an aircraft with inoperable instruments or equipment installed unless the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) An approved Minimum Equipment List exists for that aircraft.
( 2 ) The program manager has been issued management specifications authorizing operations in accordance with an approved Minimum Equipment List. The flight crew must have direct access at all times prior to flight to all of the information contained in the approved Minimum Equipment List through printed or other means approved by the Administrator in the program manager's management specifications. An approved Minimum Equipment List, as authorized by the management specifications, constitutes an approved change to the type design without requiring recertification.
( 3 ) The approved Minimum Equipment List must: ( i ) Be prepared in accordance with the limitations specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
( ii ) Provide for the operation of the aircraft with certain instruments and equipment in an inoperable condition.
( 4 ) Records identifying the inoperable instruments and equipment and the information required by (a)(3)(ii) of this section must be available to the pilot.
( 5 ) The aircraft is operated under all applicable conditions and limitations contained in the Minimum Equipment List and the management specifications authorizing use of the Minimum Equipment List.
( b ) The following instruments and equipment may not be included in the Minimum Equipment List: ( 1 ) Instruments and equipment that are either specifically or otherwise required by the airworthiness requirements under which the airplane is type certificated and that are essential for safe operations under all operating conditions.
( 2 ) Instruments and equipment required by an airworthiness directive to be in operable condition unless the airworthiness directive provides otherwise.
( 3 ) Instruments and equipment required for specific operations by this part.
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(3) of this section, an aircraft with inoperable instruments or equipment may be operated under a special flight permit under §§ 21.197 and 21.199 of this chapter.
( d ) A person authorized to use an approved Minimum Equipment List issued for a specific aircraft under part 121, 125, or 135 of this chapter must use that Minimum Equipment List to comply with this section.