United States 

Department of 

Agriculture 

Forest Service 

Tongass 

National Forest 

R10-MB-742b 

February 2013 

Dargon Point 

Commercial Thinning 

Decision Notice and Finding of 

No Significant Impact 

Thorne Bay Ranger District 

Thorne Bay, Alaska 

 comments-alaska-tongass-ketchikan-mistyfiord@fs.fed.us
Dargon Point EA Acronyms 

ANHP – Alaska Natural Heritage Program 

ANILCA – Alaska National Interest Lands 

Conservation Act 

ATM – Access and Travel Management 

BA – Biological assessment 

BE – Biological evaluation 

BMPs – Best Management Practices 

CFR – Code of Federal Regulations 

CMAI - Culmination of mean annual 

increment 

EA – Environmental Assessment 

EFH – Essential Fish Habitat 

EIS – Environmental Impact Statement 

FASTR – Financial Analysis Spreadsheet 

Tool-Residual 

FSH – Forest Service Handbook 

FSM – Forest Service Manual 

FONSI – Finding of No Significant Impact 

HUC – Hydrologic unit code 

IDT – Interdisciplinary team 

ITS - Individual-tree selection 

LUD – Land Use Designation 

MAF – Marine Access Facility 

MBF – Thousand Board Feet 

MMBF – Million Board Feet 

NEPA – National Environmental Policy Act 

NFMA – National Forest Management Act 

NFS – National Forest Service 

NHPA – National Historic Preservation Act 

NRIS – Natural Resource Information 

System 

OHV – Off Highway Vehicle 

POG – Productive old-growth 

POW – Prince of Wales Island 

RAW – Reasonable assurance of 

windfirmness 

RMA – Riparian Management Area 

S&G – Standards and Guidelines 

SOPA - Schedule of Proposed Actions 

TES – Threatened, endangered and sensitive 

species 

TM – Timber production 

TTRA – Tongass Timber Reform Act 

VDT – Variable density thinning 

WAA – Wildlife analysis area 

YG – Young-growth 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on 

the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, 

or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who 

require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) 

should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). 

To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, 

Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 

(voice and TTY). 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 

Page intentionally left blank. 
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning 

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service 

 Tongass National Forest 

 Thorne Bay Ranger District 

Responsible Official: Perry Edwards 

 Thorne Bay District Ranger 

 PO Box 19001 

 Thorne Bay, Alaska 

For More Information Contact: Ben Case 

 Tongass National Forest 

 PO Box 309 

 Petersburg, Alaska 99833 

Abstract 

Alternative 3 of the Dargon Point Commercial Thinning Environmental Assessment was 

selected for implementation. The Selected Alternative consists of harvest of around 2.5 

million board feet (MMBF) of mature (60-70 years old) young-growth timber from a stand 

approximately 70 acres in size. Approximately 1 mile of road construction requires further 

development of roughly 1 acre of an existing rock pit. No road would be constructed 

within the 1,000-foot beach fringe. The project area is located in the Naukati area on 

Prince of Wales Island, Alaska. 
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

Figure 1. Dargon Point vicinity map
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

1 

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

for 

Dargon Point Commercial Thinning Environmental Assessment 

USDA Forest Service 

Tongass National Forest 

Thorne Bay Ranger District 

Introduction 

This Decision Notice (DN) contains a brief summary of the environmental analysis 

completed for the Dargon Point Commercial Thinning Project, my decision regarding 

which alternative to implement and the rationale for my decision. It also contains certain 

findings required by various laws and information concerning the right to Administrative 

Review of this decision. The Environmental Assessment (EA) completed for this project is 

incorporated by reference in this decision document. 

Project Area Location 

The 2,276-acre Dargon Point project area is located along the western shore of Prince of 

Wales Island, approximately 3 miles north of the community of Naukati, within the 

Thorne Bay Ranger District, Tongass National Forest (see Vicinity Map, Figure 1, and 

Project Map, Figure 2). 

The project area includes a portion of wildlife analysis area (WAA) 1422 and a portion of 

the Sarkar Creek and Jinhi Bay-Frontal El Capitan Passage (6th level HUC) watersheds. 

This project occurs outside of an inventoried roadless area, and entirely within the TM 

LUD. Overall, the terrain is relatively gentle, comprised of glacial till over limestone 

bedrock. 

This area has one of the higher concentrations of young-growth on the Tongass, with a 

small portion of these stands dating back to the early 1900s. The area also has a significant 

amount of young-growth from more recent harvest (1960s through the 1990s). Older 

harvest in the area originally accessed stands of timber from the beach; however, harvest 

since 1960 has developed a network of roads throughout most of the project area. 

Decision 

After consideration of the public and agency input, the recommendations of resource 

specialists, and the applicable laws and regulations, it is my decision to select Alternative 

3 (hereafter called the Selected Alternative) for implementation including all project 

design elements, mitigation, and monitoring described in the EA. 
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

2 

Figure 2. Project area, harvest unit and Land Use Designations
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

3 

The Selected Alternative includes harvest of around 2.5 million board feet (MMBF) of 

mature (60-70 years old) young-growth timber from a stand approximately 70 acres in 

size. Harvest consists of clearcutting on approximately 54 acres and thinning through 

variable-density thinning within the 16 acres of 1,000-foot Beach and Estuary Fringe 

Buffer. Approximately 1 mile of road construction requires further development of 

roughly 1 acre of an existing rock pit. No road would be constructed within the 1,000-foot 

beach and estuary buffer.

Decision Rationale 

In making this decision, I considered applicable laws, regulations, policy, and the 2008 

Forest Plan in relation to information disclosed in the EA and project record. I believe the 

best available science and information was used in the analysis. I considered how the 

alternatives met the purpose and need for action and addressed the issues. I also 

considered the effects of the project on the human and natural environment and weighed 

the potential resource effects, as well as the public benefit. 

While the public comments generally supported this project, some commenters expressed 

concern over timber harvest economics, while others conveyed concerns over potential 

adverse effects to wildlife and soil resources. 

I believe that these concerns are addressed in the EA and through Forest Plan Standards 

and Guidelines, best management practices (BMPs), and mitigation and monitoring which 

will minimize the potential for adverse environmental effects. I believe the Selected 

Alternative best meets the desires expressed by the public and the project’s purpose and 

need. I also believe this decision is in line with the intent of the Transition Framework, 

which outlines a commitment to improving ecological functions while providing goods 

and services and supporting economic growth through young-growth management. 

I recognize that the size of this project presents challenges for potential purchasers. 

Potential purchasers commented that the amount of volume is important in order to cover 

mobilization and operating costs. Another comment indicated that this project, if offered 

as one sale, would exceed the capacity of smaller operators who may be interested in 

processing young-growth. I believe the Selected Alternative provides the greatest 

flexibility in providing one or more economical offerings for potential purchasers. 

Currently, tree diameters at breast height for the co-dominant and dominant trees range 

from 18-26 inches. Trees of this size are conducive for mechanized equipment. If the 

stand was thinned, there is a risk the remaining trees would be too large for a future entry 

using more modern mechanized equipment. 

The Selected Alternative also addresses, to the extent reasonable, the risk of windthrow. 

There is a greater risk of windthrow when thinning a stand of this age that has not had 

previous silvicultural treatment, such as pre-commercial thinning. To address this, the 

treatment within the beach fringe has been designed to mitigate the risk of windthrow by 

leaving an untreated windfirm buffer along the shoreline; however, further away from this 

buffer and outside of the 1,000-foot beach fringe, the risk of windthrow is greater. 

Where even-aged management will occur with the Selected Alternative, I am confident 

effects from clearcutting relative to stand development, including regeneration, will be 
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

4 

consistent with past harvest of young growth on other similar karst sites and soils. Forest 

soil scientists have conducted monitoring on many recently harvested young growth sites 

(Winter Harbor, Staney, Soda Nick, and the PCTs) with similar soils. All of these projects 

are within R10 Soil Quality Standards and are productive for regeneration. 

Considering the concerns to wildlife habitat, the Selected Alternative is designed to 

increase forage production, improve stand structural diversity and accelerate stand 

succession toward old-growth conditions within the beach buffer. Outside of the beach 

buffer, harvest will delay the progression toward old-growth conditions and reduce forage 

access during periods of deep snow on approximately 54 acres of the stand. Harvest will 

benefit, however, some species during the summer and winters during periods of little 

snow by improving shrub and forb production until the clearcut portion re-enters the stem 

exclusion stage. 

Purpose and Need 

In an effort to implement Forest Plan Goals and Objectives, as well as respond to an 

increasing interest and effort in producing commercial wood products through 

management of young-growth on the Tongass National Forest, there is a need in the 

Dargon Point project area for vegetation treatments that: 

 Improve forest vegetation conditions for timber production and wildlife habitat, 

 Promote forest health, 

 Respond to the goals and objectives in the Forest Plan for the management of 

young-growth stands. 

Issues 

I chose the Selected Alternative because it best addresses the relevant issues and concerns. 

The key issue developed from scoping comments concerned the timber economics and 

that even-aged harvest would have a positive impact on the production of young-growth 

timber for the stand. The Selected Alernative best meets this issue by providing the 

greatest potential to make available wood products in an economically efficient manner 

while improving wildlife habitat in the 1,000 foot beach fringe. 

Alternatives Considered 

Three alternatives are presented in the EA, a No Action Alternative, the Proposed Action 

and the Selected Alternative, which was developed to respond to the scoping comment 

received. A comparison of alternatives is presented in the EA, pages 4-10. 

Public and Agency Involvement 

The project was introduced to the collaborative Staney Community Forest Working Group 

in a June 15, 2011 progress report and reported on again September 23, 2011 by the 

Thorne Bay District Ranger. 
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

5 

The project has been listed on the Thorne Bay Ranger District Schedule of Proposed 

Actions (SOPA) since April 1, 2012. A scoping letter1

 was sent on April 23, 2012 to 

approximately 140 individuals, organizations, and federal and state agencies that had 

previously shown interest in USDA Forest Service projects within the vicinity of Prince of 

Wales Island, Alaska. The scoping letter solicited comments, and summarized the purpose 

and need and actions proposed. One response to scoping was received. To address the 

comments, the IDT developed an alternative to the proposed action (Alternative 3). 

An EA was sent to approximately 189 interested parties in December 2012. In addition, 

two news releases were sent to Alaska media outlets on December 3 and 10, 2012. The 

30-day comment period on the EA was initiated on December 10, 2012 with the 

publication of the Notice of Availability in the Ketchikan Daily News, the newspaper of 

record. The comment period ended on January 9, 2013. 

The Thorne Bay Ranger District (TBRD) received 10 letters/emails from respondents 

during the 30-day comment period. Excerpts from these communications, followed by 

responses from TBRD were filed in the project record and are available on the project 

website2. 

Changes and Clarifications to the EA 

After public and agency review of the EA, the following changes and clarifications have 

been made. 

Page 1, “What is Being Proposed With This Project?” The following is an addition to the 

proposed action. The approximate 1 acre expansion of the existing rock pit located at 

milepost 0.65 on NFS road 2060130 was analyzed for in the project’s resource-specific 

analyses and will be carried out in compliance with Forest Plan Standards and Guidelines 

as well as project specific BMPs (EA, pages 16-17, 60 and 62). The expansion of this rock 

pit involves approximately 1 acre for the production of roughly 6,500 cubic yards of rock 

for road construction. 

Page 17. A hyphen was missing in item two under “Mitigation.” It should read, “High 

vulnerability karst features would receive no-harvest buffers.” Without the hyphen in “noharvest,” the reader may infer that karst features would not receive harvest buffers. 

Page 34, last sentence, should read, “Alternative 2 will have negligible effects to wolves 

since it will not result in a change to the deer density and road density in WAA 1422 will 

only increase by <0.2 percent.” 

Page 38, Table 5, Archipelago Wolf, Level of Influence Determination should be 

“negligible” rather than “no effect.” The determination of “no effects” is only for 

Threatened and Endangered species. 

Appendix A. Additional language added to the unit and road cards within this document. 

Mitigation measures for reducing the risk of introducing or spreading invasive plant 

 

1

 A copy of this letter is on the project webpage: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/fs-usda-pop.php/?project=38409 2

 Project website: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/fs-usda-pop.php/?project=38409
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

6 

species were added to the unit and road cards. These measures require that ground-based 

equipment (road building equipment, yarders, shovels, skidders, forwarders, harvesters, 

processors or feller bunchers, etc.) will be cleaned prior to implementation and 

mobilization, if the equipment is imported to Prince of Wales Island from another 

location. Only Forest Service approved rock sources will be used. Any new introductions 

of high-priority invasive plants found in the project area will be treated according to 

Forest Service Manual supplement (TNF 2000-2007-1), and the Region 10 and Tongass 

Invasive Plant Management Plan as part of the District’s program of work for invasive 

species management. 

Finding of No Significant Impact 

After considering the environmental effects described in the EA, I have determined that 

these actions will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment 

considering the context and intensity of impacts (40 CFR 1508.27). Thus, an 

environmental impact statement will not be prepared. I base my finding on the following: 

1. Impacts that may be both beneficial and adverse. A significant effect may exist 

even if the federal agency believes that on balance the effect will be beneficial.

Neither adverse nor beneficial effects are significant in context or intensity to 

warrant an EIS for this project. My finding of no significant environmental effects 

is not biased by the beneficial effects of the action. 

2. The degree to which the Selected Alternative affects public health or safety. Based 

on the conclusions in the EA, I have determined that no significant impact would 

occur to the public health and safety. The project area is located away from 

populated areas. While project operations could cause temporary traffic delays or 

congestion to recreation users of the road system, the Forest Service would 

communicate with the public regarding when and where potential delays could 

take place. 

3. Unique characteristics of the geographic areas such as proximity to historic or 

cultural resources, park lands, prime farmlands, wetlands, wild and scenic rivers, 

or ecologically critical areas. The project does not enter into any inventoried 

roadless areas. No historic properties, park lands or farmlands are located within 

the area of potential effects for the project. No wild and scenic rivers occur in the 

project area or are affected by the project. High-value wetlands and highvulnerability karst will not be affected by the project. Therefore, I have determined 

there will be no significant effects on any unique characteristics of the area. 

4. The degree to which the effects on the quality of the human environment are likely 

to be highly controversial. The effects on the quality of the human environment are 

not likely to be highly controversial. This project was proposed in response to 

increasing interest in producing commercial wood products through management 

of young-growth on the Tongass National Forest. While there is general 

controversy over old-growth timber harvest in Southeast Alaska, this project 

proposes only the harvest of young-growth timber. This project responds to the 

goals and objectives of the Forest Plan (pages 2-7 through 2-9) and helps move the 

project area towards conditions described therein. Therefore, I have determined 
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

7 

there will be no significant impacts based on the evidence found in the EA that 

would be highly controversial. 

5. The degree to which the possible effects on the human environment are highly 

uncertain or involve unique or unknown risks. The Forest Service has extensive 

experience with the types of activities to be implemented. The effects analysis 

shows the effects are not uncertain, and do not involve unique or unknown risk. 

Similar type of harvest and road construction, like what is proposed and analyzed 

in the EA, has been successfully implemented on the Thorne Bay Ranger District 

and elsewhere on the Tongass National Forest. Based on this analysis, I have 

determined there are no unique or unknown risks involved with this project, 

therefore there is no significant impact due to uncertainty or a possible unique or 

unknown risk. 

6. The degree to which the action may establish a precedent for future actions with 

significant effects or represents a decision in principle about a future 

consideration. This action is not likely to establish a precedent for future actions 

with significant effects since the proposed activities are small in scale and are 

expected to have overall beneficial effects to wildlife and timber resources. I have 

therefore determined the Selected Alternative would not set precedent for future 

actions with significant impacts, nor would it represent a decision in principle 

about a future consideration. 

7. Whether the action is related to other actions with individually insignificant but 

cumulatively significant impacts. I have determined the Selected Alternative will 

have individually insignificant impacts and cumulatively insignificant impacts as 

they relate to past, present, and reasonably foreseeable actions. All previously 

harvested stands on the District have regenerated and many have received previous 

treatments such as thinning, pruning, or planting. No significant cumulative effects 

were identified for any resource in the EA. The proposed vegetation treatments 

should have long-term beneficial effects to beach buffer wildlife habitat and future 

timber production outside of the beach fringe. Road construction will also have 

beneficial effects to future timber management. 

8. The degree to which the action may adversely affect districts, sites, highways, 

structures, or objects listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of 

Historic Places or may cause loss or destruction of significant scientific, cultural, 

or historical resources. The Forest Service has determined that a finding of No 

Historic Properties Affected is appropriate for this project. This project meets the 

provisions stipulated in the Programmatic Agreement between the Forest Service, 

Alaska Region, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and the State 

Historic Preservation Officer. Therefore, I have determined no significant impacts 

would occur that adversely affect districts, sites, highways, structures, or objects 

listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places or cause 

loss or destruction of significant scientific, cultural, or historical resources. 

9. The degree to which the action may adversely affect an endangered or threatened 

species or its habitat that has been determined to be critical under the Endangered 

Species Act of 1973. The action will not adversely affect any endangered or 
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

8 

threatened species or its habitat that has been determined to be critical under the 

Endangered Species Act of 1973, because there are no listed species or critical 

habitat in the project area and no marine environment is included in the project 

area. Effects to the marine environment are anticipated to be negligible and would 

consist of small pulses of sedimentation that will likely settle out in the estuary 

before reaching marine waters where marine mammals occur. Therefore, I have 

determined no significant impacts would occur that adversely affect an endangered 

or threatened species or its habitat. The Biological Assessment concluded there 

was “No Effect” for any threatened or endangered species or their critical habitats. 

10. Whether the action threatens a violation of federal, state, or local law or 

requirements imposed for the protection of the environment. The following 

findings show that the action does not violate federal, state, or local law 

requirements imposed for the protection of the environment and has been reviewed 

by federal and state agencies. The action is consistent with the Forest Plan. 

Findings Required by Other Laws and Regulations 

Many federal laws and executive orders pertain to project-specific planning and 

environmental analysis on federal lands. While most of the laws and executive orders 

listed below pertain to all federal lands, some of the laws are specific to Alaska. 

Several of the laws and executive orders listed below require project-specific findings or 

other disclosures. These apply to federal land management projects and activities and are 

included here and in any future Decision Notice. They apply to all alternatives considered 

in this EA. 

National Forest Management Act 

The National Forest Management Act (NFMA) requires specific determinations to be 

made for this project: consistency with the Forest Plan and FSM 2410.3, R10 Supp. 2400-

2002-1 (5/7/2002); a determination of clearcutting as the optimal method of harvesting, if 

used; and specific authorizations to create openings over 100 acres in size. Specific 

information and rationale used to develop the unit prescription is located in the project 

record. 

2008 Tongass Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan): 

This project is consistent with the Forest Plan and all project alternatives comply with the 

2008 Tongass Land and Resource Management Plan. This project incorporates all 

applicable Forest Plan Standards and Guidelines and management prescriptions, and 

complies with Forest Plan goals and objectives. The Forest Plan complies with all 

resource integration and management requirements of 36 CFR 219 (219.14 through 

219.27). Application of Forest Plan direction for the Dargon Point Commercial Thinning 

project ensures compliance at the project level. Therefore, the Dargon Point Commercial 

Thinning Selected Alternative is consistent with the Forest Plan. 

 
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

9 

Even-aged Management as the Optimal Method of Harvesting: 

The Forest Plan (USDA FS 2008a, pp. 4-71 to 4-72) gives guidance on when to use evenaged management. Even-aged management will be used in this project to: 

 achieve timber production objectives; 

 preclude and minimize the occurrence of, and the potential adverse impacts from 

windthrow; and 

 to provide for the establishment and growth of desired trees. 

Harvest Openings over 100 Acres in Size: 

There are no harvest openings over 100 acres proposed for this project. Therefore, the 

Dargon Point Commercial Thinning project is consistent with the Forest Plan and FSM 

2410.3, R10 Supp. 2400-2002-1 and consequently complies with the National Forest 

Management Act. 

Endangered Species Act 

The project alternatives are not anticipated to have a direct, indirect, or cumulative effect 

on any threatened and endangered species in or outside the project area. A biological 

evaluation has been completed for this action which indicates that no federally listed 

threatened or endangered species will be affected by this activity. Consultation with the 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is not required because no threatened and endangered 

terrestrial species occur in the project area. ESA does not require consultation for "no 

effect" determinations. 

Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act 

Management activities within bald eagle habitat will be in accordance to a Memorandum 

of Understanding between the Forest Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 

Tongass Timber Reform Act 

The Tongass Timber Reform Act (TTRA) prohibits commercial timber harvest within 100 

feet on either side of Class I streams and Class II streams that flow directly into Class I 

streams. TTRA also requires the use of BMPs. The Forest-wide Riparian Standards and 

Guidelines in the Forest Plan incorporate the requirements of TTRA. 

National Historic Preservation Act 

Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires federal agencies to take into 

account the effects of their undertakings on significant historic properties. The Forest 

Service program for compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) 

includes locating, inventorying and evaluating the National Register of Historic Places 

eligibility of historic and archeological sites that may be directly or indirectly affected by 

scheduled activities. Regulations (36 CFR 800) implementing Section 106 of the NHPA 

require federal agencies to consider the effects of their actions on sites that are determined 

eligible for inclusion in or are listed in the National Register of Historic Places (“historic 

properties”). 
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

10 

A Forest Service archaeologist has reviewed this project. The final determination by 

Forest Service Heritage Resources is that the project will have no effect on historic 

properties eligible to the National Register of Historic Places. 

Federal Cave Resource Protection Act 

No known significant caves in the project area will be directly or indirectly affected by 

project activities. Forest Plan Karst and Caves Standards and Guidelines will be applied to 

areas known or suspected to contain karst resources. One significant insurgence feature 

was found along the southern portion of the unit and will be protected by a 100-foot noharvest buffer. 

ANILCA Sections 810 & 811, Subsistence Evaluation and Finding 

Consistent with section 810 of ANILCA, potential effects of this project on subsistence 

opportunities and resources were evaluated. Because there will be no reduction in 

abundance and distribution of, access to and competition for subsistence resources, the 

proposed project will not result in a restriction of subsistence uses of wildlife, fish, or 

other foods. Addition of about 1 mile of road may add to access for some subsistence 

users. Therefore, the Dargon Point Commercial Thinning project is consistent with 

ANILCA. 

Clean Water Act 

Congress intended the Clean Water Act of 1972 as amended in 1977 and 1987 to protect 

and improve the quality of water resources and maintain their beneficial uses. Section 313 

and Executive Order 12088 of January 23, 1987 address federal agency compliance and 

consistency with water pollution control mandates. Sections 208 and 319 address nonpoint 

source pollution caused by activities such as timber harvest. The site-specific application 

of best management practices (BMPs), with a monitoring and feedback mechanism, is the 

approved strategy for controlling nonpoint source pollution as defined by Alaska’s 

Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Strategy (ADEC 2007). Annual Tongass National 

Forest BMP monitoring results consistently report a high success rate at applying BMPs 

(USFS 2005-2012). In 1997, the State approved the BMPs as described in the Forest 

Service’s Soil and Water Conservation Handbook (USDA FS 2006) as consistent with the 

Alaska Forest Resources and Practices Regulations. The BMPs are incorporated into the 

Tongass Land Management Plan. 

The Forest Service recently issued National Core BMPs (USDA FS 2012). Directives for 

using these BMPs are currently in development. The Dargon Point project will implement 

the most up-to-date BMP guidance. A list of key BMPs that would be implemented as part 

of the Dargon Point project is included in the watershed resource report. 

A discharge of dredge or fill material from normal silvicultural activities such as 

harvesting for the production of forest products is exempt from Section 404 permitting 

requirements in waters of the United States, including wetlands (404(f)(1)(A). Forest 

roads qualify for this exemption only if they are constructed and maintained in accordance 

with BMPs to assure that flow and circulation patterns and chemical and biological 

characteristics of the waters are not impaired (404)(f)(1)(E). The BMPs are specified in 33 

CFR 323.4(a). These specific BMPs have been incorporated into the Forest Service’s 

BMP 12.5 (USDA FS 2006). 
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

11 

Currently, there is uncertainty as to whether a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination 

System (NPDES) permit will be required for stormwater discharges from logging roads 

associated with this project. Should it be determined that a NPDES permit is required for 

this project, the Forest Service will comply with any applicable NPDES permitting 

requirements. 

Clean Air Act 

Emissions anticipated from the implementation of any project alternative will be minor 

and of short duration and are not expected to exceed State of Alaska ambient air quality 

standards (18 AAC 50). Therefore, no significant impact to air quality is expected to occur 

from this project. 

Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 

Section 305(b)(2) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 

states that all federal agencies must consult with the National Marine Fisheries Service 

(NMFS) for actions and proposed actions that may adversely affect essential fish habitat 

(EFH). Following our 2007 agreement with the NMFS, the EFH Assessment was included 

in the EA. The Forest Service determined that the Dargon Point Commercial Thinning 

project may adversely affect EFH, but would be minor and localized and would not 

degrade fish habitat. The NMFS did not submit comments on the EA. This satisfies the 

EFH consultation requirement based on the 2007 Agreement with NMFS. 

Executive Order 11988 (Floodplains) 

Executive Order 11988 directs agencies to avoid construction in and modification of 

floodplains. Although this act deals largely with avoiding flood damage and hazards, it 

also directs agencies to restore and preserve the natural and beneficial values of 

floodplains while planning for land use. There are no floodplains affected by the Dargon 

Point project. 

Executive Order 11990 (Wetlands) 

Executive Order 11990 directs agencies to avoid to the extent feasible the destruction or 

modification of wetlands where there is a practicable alternative. It also directs agencies to 

preserve and enhance natural and beneficial values of wetlands in conducting land use 

planning. There are no wetlands affected by the Dargon Point project (Saari 2012). 

Executive Order 12898 (Environmental Justice)

Executive Order 12898 directs federal agencies to identify and address the issue of 

environmental justice, i.e., adverse human health and environmental effects of agency 

programs that disproportionately impact minority and low-income populations. 

Implementation of any of the project alternatives is not anticipated to cause any adverse 

human health or environmental effects; therefore, implementation of any of the project 

alternatives is not anticipated to cause disproportionate adverse human health or 

environmental effects to minority or low-income populations. Expected effects are similar 

for all populations, regardless of nationality, gender, race, or income. 

 
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

12 

Executive Order 12962 (Aquatic Systems and Recreational Fisheries) 

Executive Order 12962 directs federal agencies to conserve, restore, and enhance aquatic 

systems to provide for increased recreational fishing opportunities nationwide. 

With the application of Forest Plan Standards and Guidelines, including those for riparian 

areas, no significant adverse effects to freshwater or marine resources will occur. Best 

management practices will be implemented to provide assurance of water quality and 

aquatic habitat protection for all freshwater streams affected by the project. There will be 

no effects to recreational fishing opportunities. 

Executive Order 13007 (Indian Sacred Sites) 

Executive Order 13007 directs federal agencies to (1) accommodate access to and 

ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites by Indian religious practitioners and (2) avoid 

adversely affecting the physical integrity of such sacred sites. Where appropriate, agencies 

shall maintain the confidentiality of sacred sites. Based on consultations with the 

appropriate Indian tribes (EA, pp. 10-11), this project will not affect the integrity of any 

sacred sites or limit access to any sacred sites. 

Executive Order 13112 (Invasive Species) 

This order addresses a broader group of not only plants, but other taxa as well. An 

invasive species is one whose introduction does or is likely to cause economic or 

environmental harm or harm to human health. Specifically, EO 13112 directs all federal 

agencies to address the impacts their actions may have on invasive species. This project 

may have a moderate risk of introducing and spreading invasive plant species in the 

harvest unit or road corridor; however, with mitigation measures such as equipment 

cleaning, increased risk would be reduced to low, or minor. 

Required Permits 

Permits will be obtained from federal and state agencies as needed. No permits have been 

identified, as required, for project activities at this time. 

Distribution 

The Dargon Point Commercial Thinning Decision Notice, FONSI, and EA are available 

on the internet at http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/fs-usda-pop.php/?project=38409. Notification 

of the availability of this Decision Notice was sent to those on the project mailing list 

including state and federal agencies, anyone commenting on the project, and anyone 

requesting a copy of this decision. In addition, a legal notice of the availability of this 

decision was published in the Ketchikan Daily News. 

The project mailing list is available in the project record. The Decision Notice is also 

available in hard copy or on CD, upon request. 

Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

14 

Literature Cited 

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). 2007. Alaska’s Nonpoint 

Source Pollution Control Strategy. 110 p. 

http://dec.alaska.gov/water/wnpspc/pdfs/2007_NPSStrategy.pdf (accessed 

10/15/2012). 

USDA Forest Service. 2012. National Best Management Practices for Water Quality 

Management on National Forest System Lands. Volume 1: National Core BMP 

Technical Guide. FS-990. 177 p. 

USDA Forest Service. 2008a. Tongass Land and Resource Management Plan. 

Management Bulletin. R10-MB-603b. Juneau, AK: USDA Forest Service, Alaska 

Region, Tongass National Forest.

USDA Forest Service. 2008b. Tongass Land and Resource Management Plan, Final 

Environmental Impact Statement, Plan Amendment, Volumes I and II. 

Management Bulletin. R10-MB-603c and R10-MB-603d. Juneau, AK: USDA 

Forest Service, Alaska Region, Tongass National Forest.

USDA Forest Service. 2006. Soil and Water Conservation Handbook. R10-2509.22-2006-

2. Chapter 10, Section 14.26. Juneau, AK: USDA Forest Service, Alaska Region. 

117 p. 
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

15 

Appendix A - Unit and Road Cards 
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

16 
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

17 

Unit Data Card 

LUD: TM Logging Systems: Shovel Total Unit Acres: 70 Net Harvest 

Volume MMBF:

2.5 

SILVICULTURE: 

Existing Stand Condition/Vegetation: The unit is a70 year old even-aged young-growth stand of spruce and hemlock. 

Western redcedar does occur within the unit but to a minor extent. Species composition is estimated to be 86% Sitka 

spruce, 14% western hemlock and <1% redcedar. Currently, a majority of the stand is in the stem exclusion stage. 

Average stem height-to-diameter ratios over most of the stand are within the range suitable for intermediate treatment; 

however, portions of the stand consists of taller, more spindly trees making these areas unstable if predisposed through 

thinning to wind, snow and ice damage. Pockets of windthrow are present in the southern portion of the stand. Minor 

tree species, if present, consist of the occasional western redcedar. Snags and downed trees are comprised of mostly 

intermediate and smaller sized material from trees that have succumbed to suppression mortality; however small 

groups of larger trees of the dominant and codominant crown have blown over within the stand. Windthrow risk high. 

Mistletoe occurance is low, but is present in old growth trees outside of the unit where old growth exists. 

The understory condition relative to deer browse was noted by the IDT as higher than expected for a stand in stem 

exclusion stage. Understory plants include mostly ferns, however vaccinium, fernleaf goldthread, and threeleaf 

foamflower are common and vary significantly throughout. Bunchberry dogwood is lacking overall. 

Silvicultural Prescription: Even-aged management - clearcut with natural regeneration for the 54 acres in the TM LUD. 

[Clearcutting is prescribed to preclude or minimize the occurrence of mistletoe, windthrow, or logging system damage, 

increase the regeneration of desirable species and remove decayed trees.] The remaining 16 acres in the beach fringe 

would be variable-density thinning by individual tree selection, retaining 50% of the stand’s basal area, with a 4-acre 

skip and 1⁄4-acre gaps. Thinning intensity should be lighter along the skipped corridor than within that portion of the 

beach fringe adjacent to the clearcut The resulting stand within the beach fringe would be two-aged tending to unevenaged. 

TIMBER/LOGGING: Shovel yarding to proposed road. This unit is designed for partial suspension using a shovel in 

conjunction with a feller-buncher where possible, and conventional felling where the feller-buncher cannot be used. 

ENGINEERING/ROADS: Refer to road cards for Routes 2060132, 2060133, 2060134, in this section.

GEOLOGY/KARST: A 100-foot buffer is required around a high-vulnerability karst feature that is located along the 

southern boundary of the unit. Karst features within the proposed unit would be protected by designating them with 

stream protection flagging to minimize adjacent ground disturbance, control equipment crossings, and require logging 

debris removal. 

Fisheries: One Class I stream is located along the north western boundary of the unit. Required no-harvest buffer is 

130 ft. or to the extent of floodplain and riparian vegetation or soils; whichever is greater. One Class II stream located 

along the south western boundary of the unit. Required no-harvest buffer is 100 ft. or to the top of the side-slope break; 

whichever is greater. There is blowdown present along the streams and an IDT review for RAW zone will be required. 

Soils: Avoid the limestone rock outcrop and cliff on the southern boundary of the unit. The trees on the toeslope may be 

directionally felled to the shovel. Use care when operating on slopes greater than 25%. Generally avoid shovel use on 

slopes over 35% gradient. Use slash to support equipment, especially on multi-pass skid trails. If mineral soils are 

exposed on skid trails, slash and if necessary use waterbars to prevent erosion (R10 BMP 12.17 and National BMPs 

Veg-2 and Veg-4). The puncheon trails should be scattered upon completion of yarding activities. If necessary, a soil 

scientist will visit pre, during, and post harvest. 

 
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

18 

Wildlife: Windfirmness in the beach buffer is emphasized, as well as promotion of old growth structure including 

accelerating growth of large, windfirm trees. Gaps in the beach fringe should be situated where the best understory 

recruitment of forage species is likely and avoid the largest young-growth or residual trees.

Heritage: Full avoidance of known cultural resources is required. All known cultural resources will be flagged and 

removed from the harvest unit and approved by a heritage specialist prior to implementation.

Invasive Plant Species: In the event that sediment control is necessary, use of silt fence or coconut fiber matting is 

recommended instead of straw bales (since straw bales have been known to introduce invasive species). If reseeding is 

required, utilized contract specifications that specify weed free material, and that the seed contain no more than 0.01% 

other seed, whether identified or not. Native seed may or may not be available, check with the POW Ecologist 

otherwise, typical weed-free mixes tend to include: 40% Annual ryegrass, 40% boreal red fescue, 20% Arctared fescue.

Ground-based equipment (road building equipment, yarders, shovels, skidders, forwarders, harvesters, processors or 

feller bunchers, etc.) will be cleaned prior to implementation and mobilization, if the equipment is imported to Prince 

of Wales Island from another location. 

 

 Any new introductions of high-priority invasive plants found in the project area will be treated according to Forest 

 Service Manual supplement (TNF 2000-2007-1), and the Region 10 and Tongass Invasive Plant Management Plan as 

 part of the District’s program of work for invasive species management. 

No resource concerns were identified for Recreation and Scenery. 

Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

20 

Road Management Objectives 

Site Specific Design Criteria 

Road 2060132 

ROAD LOCATION: Route utilizes decommissioned road bed. Gentle grades with adverse to 8%. No 

streams along road. 

WETLANDS: Road avoids wetlands (R10 BMP 12.5). 

EROSION CONTROL: An erosion control plan will be developed by the contractor and subject to approval 

by the Contracting Officer (R10 BMP 14.5 and National BMPs Road-3 and Veg-2). All areas of organic or 

mineral soil exposed during construction shall be grass seeded and fertilized (R10 BMPs 12.17, 14.8, 

14.11, 14.12 and National BMP Road-3). After timber harvest, road storage will implement measures to 

intercept, collect, and remove water from the road surface and surrounding slopes in a manner that 

reduces concentrated flow in ditches, culverts, and over fill slopes and road surfaces without frequent 

maintenance (R10 BMP 14.20). 

ROCK PITS: During periods of high rainfall (as defined by regional specifications), blasting operations will 

be suspended at quarries near potentially unstable sites where ground vibrations may induce mass 

movement (R10 BMP 14.6). Also during these periods, road construction that requires rock supplied from 

quarries shall be suspended in high risk areas on roads where rock hauling would increase the risk of 

mass failure (R10 BMP 14.7 and National BMP Min-5). Potential rock source located at milepost 0.65 on 

road 2060130. 

OTHER RESOURCE INFORMATION (if applicable) 

TIMBER/LOGGING SYSTEMS: no concern 

WILDLIFE: no concern 

BOTANY: no concern 

INVASIVE SPECIES: In the event that sediment control is necessary, use of silt fence or coconut fiber 

matting is recommended instead of straw bales (since straw bales have been known to introduce invasive 

species). If reseeding is required, utilized contract specifications that specify weed free material, and that 

the seed contain no more than 0.01% other seed, whether identified or not. Native seed may or may not 

be available, check with the POW Ecologist otherwise, typical weed-free mixes tend to include: 40% 

Annual ryegrass, 40% boreal red fescue, 20% Arctared fescue 

Ground-based equipment (road building equipment, yarders, shovels, skidders, forwarders, harvesters, 

processors or feller bunchers, etc.) must be cleaned prior to implementation and mobilization, if the 

equipment is imported to Prince of Wales Island from another location. Only Forest Service approved rock 

sources will be used. Any new introductions of high-priority invasive plants found in the project area will be 

treated according to Forest Service Manual supplement (TNF 2000-2007-1), and the Region 10 and 

Tongass Invasive Plant Management Plan as part of the District’s program of work for invasive species 

management. 

VISUAL/RECREATION: no concern 

CULTURAL: no concern 

LANDS/MINERALS/GEOLOGY/KARST: Road avoids high vulnerability karst features (R10 BMP 14.2). 

Road sidecast, construction slash and excess excavation will not be placed near karst features (R10 BMPs 

14.10, 14.12 and 14.19), 
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

21 

SOILS/WATER: The proposed route traverses gentle slopes. Apply R10 BMPs 14.2 and 14.7 and National 

BMPs Min-5 and Road-2). All exposed areas of mineral soil exposed during construction shall be grass 

seeded and fertilized (R10 BMPs 12.17 and 14.8 and National BMPs Road-3, Road-6, and Veg-2). 

Storage activities would involve culvert removal, water bar placement, and revegetating road bed and 

potential erosion sources (R10 BMPs 14.8 and 14.22 and National BMPs Road-1 and Road-3). 

FISHERIES: no concern 

Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

23 

Road Management Objectives 

Site Specific Design Criteria 

Road 2060133 

ROAD LOCATION: Road traverses gentle terrain with no streams crossed. Route runs slightly adverse, 

maximum adverse to 12%. Several hundred feet of side slopes to 45% are traversed prior to entering unit. 

On the remainder of the route side slopes are less than 25%. Road located to provide access for ground 

based logging system and maximize efficient yarding distance. During construction follow R10 BMPs 14.6, 

14.7, 14.12, 14.19 and National BMPs Road-2, Road-3, Road-7 and Min-5. 

WETLANDS: Road avoids wetlands (R10 BMP 12.5). 

EROSION CONTROL: An erosion control plan will be developed by the contractor and subject to approval 

by the Contracting Officer (R10 BMP 14.5 and National BMPs Road-3 and Veg-2). All areas of organic or 

mineral soil exposed during construction shall be grass seeded and fertilized (R10 BMPs 12.17, 14.8, 

14.11, 14.12 and National BMP Road-3). After timber harvest, road storage will implement measures to 

intercept, collect, and remove water from the road surface and surrounding slopes in a manner that 

reduces concentrated flow in ditches, culverts, and over fill slopes and road surfaces without frequent 

maintenance (R10 BMP 14.20). 

ROCK PITS: During periods of high rainfall (as defined by regional specifications), blasting operations will 

be suspended at quarries near potentially unstable sites where ground vibrations may induce mass 

movement (R10 BMP 14.6). Also during these periods, road construction that requires rock supplied from 

quarries shall be suspended in high risk areas on roads where rock hauling would increase the risk of 

mass failure (R10 BMP 14.7 and National BMP Min-5). Potential rock source located at milepost 0.65 on 

road 2060130. 

OTHER RESOURCE INFORMATION (if applicable) 

TIMBER/LOGGING SYSTEMS: no concern 

WILDLIFE: no concern 

BOTANY: no concern 

INVASIVE SPECIES: In the event that sediment control is necessary, use of silt fence or coconut fiber 

matting is recommended instead of straw bales (since straw bales have been known to introduce invasive 

species). If reseeding is required, utilized contract specifications that specify weed free material, and that 

the seed contain no more than 0.01% other seed, whether identified or not. Native seed may or may not 

be available, check with the POW Ecologist otherwise, typical weed-free mixes tend to include: 40% 

Annual ryegrass, 40% boreal red fescue, 20% Arctared fescue. 

Ground-based equipment (road building equipment, yarders, shovels, skidders, forwarders, harvesters, 

processors or feller bunchers, etc.) must be cleaned prior to implementation and mobilization, if the 

equipment is imported to Prince of Wales Island from another location. Only Forest Service approved rock 

sources will be used. Any new introductions of high-priority invasive plants found in the project area will be 

treated according to Forest Service Manual supplement (TNF 2000-2007-1), and the Region 10 and 

Tongass Invasive Plant Management Plan as part of the District’s program of work for invasive species 

management. 

VISUAL/RECREATION: no concern 

CULTURAL: no concern 
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

24 

LANDS/MINERALS/GEOLOGY/KARST: Road avoids high vulnerability karst features (R10 BMP 14.2). 

Road sidecast, construction slash and excess excavation will not be placed near karst features (R10 BMPs 

14.10, 14.12 and 14.19). 

SOILS/WATER: The proposed route traverses gentle slopes. Apply R10 BMPs 14.2 and 14.7 and National 

BMPs Min-5 and Road-2). All exposed areas of mineral soil exposed during construction shall be grass 

seeded and fertilized (R10 BMPs 12.17 and 14.8 and National BMPs Road-3, Road-6, and Veg-2). 

Storage activities would involve culvert removal, water bar placement, and revegetating road bed and 

potential erosion sources (R10 BMPs 14.8 and 14.22 and National BMPs Road-1 and Road-3).

FISHERIES: no concern

Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

26 

Road Management Objectives 

Site Specific Design Criteria 

Road 2060134 

ROAD LOCATION: Road traverses gentle terrain with no streams crossed. Route runs slightly adverse to 

8% along gently rolling ground. Sideslopes are less than 20%. Road located to provide access for ground 

based logging system and maximize efficient yarding distance. Road entirely within harvest unit. During 

construction follow R10 BMPs 14.6, 14.7, 14.12, 14.19 and National BMPs Road-2, Road-3, Road-7 and 

Min-5. 

WETLANDS: Road avoids wetlands (R10 BMP 12.5). 

EROSION CONTROL: An erosion control plan will be developed by the contractor and subject to approval 

by the Contracting Officer (R10 BMP 14.5 and National BMPs Road 3 and Veg-2). All areas of organic or 

mineral soil exposed during construction shall be grass seeded and fertilized (R10 BMPs 12.17, 14.8, 

14.11, 14.12 and National BMP Road-3). After timber harvest, road storage will implement measures to 

intercept, collect, and remove water from the road surface and surrounding slopes in a manner that 

reduces concentrated flow in ditches, culverts, and over fill slopes and road surfaces without frequent 

maintenance (R10 BMP 14.20). 

ROCK PITS: During periods of high rainfall (as defined by regional specifications), blasting operations will 

be suspended at quarries near potentially unstable sites where ground vibrations may induce mass 

movement (R10 BMP 14.6). Also during these periods, road construction that requires rock supplied from 

quarries shall be suspended in high risk areas on roads where rock hauling would increase the risk of 

mass failure (R10 BMP 14.7 and National BMP Min-5). Potential rock source located at milepost 0.65 on 

road 2060130. 

OTHER RESOURCE INFORMATION (if applicable) 

TIMBER/LOGGING SYSTEMS: no concern 

WILDLIFE: no concern 

BOTANY: no concern 

INVASIVE SPECIES: 

In the event that sediment control is necessary, use of silt fence or coconut fiber matting is recommended 

instead of straw bales (since straw bales have been known to introduce invasive species). If reseeding is 

required, utilized contract specifications that specify weed free material, and that the seed contain no more 

than 0.01% other seed, whether identified or not. Native seed may or may not be available, check with the 

POW Ecologist otherwise, typical weed-free mixes tend to include: 40% Annual ryegrass, 40% boreal red 

fescue, 20% Arctared fescue 

Ground-based equipment (road building equipment, yarders, shovels, skidders, forwarders, harvesters, 

processors or feller bunchers, etc.) must be cleaned prior to implementation and mobilization, if the 

equipment is imported to Prince of Wales Island from another location. Only Forest Service approved rock 

sources will be used. Any new introductions of high-priority invasive plants found in the project area will be 

treated according to Forest Service Manual supplement (TNF 2000-2007-1), and the Region 10 and 

Tongass Invasive Plant Management Plan as part of the District’s program of work for invasive species 

management. 

VISUAL/RECREATION: no concern 

CULTURAL: no concern 
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

27

LANDS/MINERALS/GEOLOGY/KARST: Road avoids high vulnerability karst features (R10 BMP 14.2). 

Road sidecast, construction slash and excess excavation will not be placed near karst features (R10 BMPs 

14.10, 14.12 and 14.19). 

SOILS/WATER: The proposed route traverses gentle slopes. Apply R10 BMPs 14.2 and 14.7 and National 

BMPs Min-5 and Road-2). All exposed areas of mineral soil exposed during construction shall be grass 

seeded and fertilized (R10 BMPs 12.17 and 14.8 and National BMPs Road-3, Road-6, and Veg-2). 

Storage activities would involve culvert removal, water bar placement, and revegetating road bed and 

potential erosion sources (R10 BMPs 14.8 and 14.22 and National BMPs Road-1 and Road-3). 

FISHERIES: no concern 
Dargon Point Commercial Thinning - Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact 

28 

Page intentionally left blank.
Federal Recycling Program 

Printed on Recycled Paper
USDA Forest Service 

Thorne Bay Ranger District, Tongass National Forest PO Box 19001 Thorne Bay, AK 99919