alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-10095

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Ponciano Delrio Rivera, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:20-CR-492-2

______________________________

Before Haynes, Graves, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Ponciano Delrio Rivera has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Delrio Rivera has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 17, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-10095 Document: 00516823398 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/17/2023
No. 23-10095

2

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-10095 Document: 00516823398 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/17/2023
Unassociated Document


    
      
        

        

      

      EXHIBIT
10.2

      


      


      


      


      


      


      


       

      FLORIDA
CERTIFICATE

      OF
GOOD STANDING OF

      PHYSICIANS
HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.

       

       

       

       

       

      
 

      
        
           


        

        
          1

          
            

          

        

        
           


        

      


      State of
Florida

      Department
of State

      


      


      I certify
from the records of this office that PHYSICIANS HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT GROUP,
INC. is a corporation organized under the laws of Nevada, authorized to transact
business in the State of Florida, qualified on December 8, 2006.

      


      The
document number of this corporation is F06000007576.

      


      I further
certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December
31, 2009, that its most recent annual report was filed on March 30, 2009, and
its status is active.

      


      I further
certify that said corporation has not filed a Certificate of
Withdrawal.

      


      


       

      [State
Seal]


      
        
           


        

        
          2
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 457 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 457

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To require that $1 coins issued during 2019 honor President George H.W. 
Bush and to direct the Secretary of the Treasury to issue bullion coins 
                 during 2019 in honor of Barbara Bush.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``President George H.W. Bush and First 
Spouse Barbara Bush Coin Act''.

SEC. 2. COINS HONORING PRESIDENT GEORGE H.W. BUSH AND FIRST SPOUSE 
              BARBARA BUSH.

    (a) Circulating $1 Coins Honoring President George H.W. Bush.--
Notwithstanding subsections (d), (n)(2)(E), (n)(3), (n)(4), and (n)(8) 
of section 5112 of title 31, United States Code, in addition to the 
coins to be issued under subsections (r) and (w) of such section 5112, 
and in accordance with the other provisions of subsection (n) of such 
section 5112, the Secretary of the Treasury, beginning on January 1, 
2020, shall mint and issue $1 coins that bear--
            (1) the image of President George H.W. Bush; and
            (2) an inscription of the year ``2020''.
    (b) Bullion Coins Honoring First Spouse Barbara Bush.--
Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (5)(C) of section 5112(o) of title 
31, United States Code, and in accordance with the other provisions of 
such section 5112(o), the Secretary of the Treasury, beginning on 
January 1, 2020, shall mint and issue bullion coins that bear--
            (1) the image of First Spouse Barbara Bush; and
            (2) an inscription of the year ``2020''.

SEC. 3. FINANCIAL ASSURANCES.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to ensure that the minting and issuing of coins under this 
Act will not result in any net cost to the United States Government.

            Passed the Senate December 16, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 457

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To require that $1 coins issued during 2019 honor President George H.W. 
Bush and to direct the Secretary of the Treasury to issue bullion coins 
                 during 2019 in honor of Barbara Bush.
```
#### EAGLE DAIRY CO v DYLAG et

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 10160.

Decided May 20, 1929

Sidney N. Weitz and Peter E. Klein, both of Cleveland, for Dairy Co.

Boer, Arnold & Tobias, Cleveland, for Dylag et.

*359VICKERY, PJ.

It is not necessary for us to go into the question at length as to' the legality or validity of contracts of this kind, for it is admitted in this lawsuit that the defendant Mike Dylag was, and is, and at all times lias been, a minor; that is, that he was a minor when this contract with The Eagle Dairy Company was made and is still a minor, and the question is whether such a contract as the one at bar can be rescinded by a minor at any time he sees fit before majority. We think the law of the rights and obligations and duties of a minor are set forth, so far as Ohio is concerned, in the case of Lemon vs. Beeman, 45 O. S. 50 (1888), which has gone as far as any case in the United States and marks out the rights and liabilities of a minor. That a minor’s contract is a voidable contract gpes without saying, and in the case of Lemon vs. Beeman, supra, the Supreme Court of Ohio held that a minor can withdraw from a contract without placing the other party in statu quo, unless he has the article that he purchased or can put the other party in statu quo, but that is not a condition precedent. If he cannot put the other person in statu quo, he can still withdraw from his contract. Now that is the law of Ohio to-day.

Applying that doctrine to the instant case, what do we find? In what way could Mike Dylag put the other person in statu quo. It must be remembered that he did not sell the business that the plaintiff acquired, nor had he any interest in it. It must be admitted likewise that he is not disposing of any of the secrets or business that he had got from the plaintiff, for if we understand this record right, the business that he is now taking to his new employer was business that he took as an employee to the plaintiff company and it was not the business of the plaintiff company that he is taking away from them.

We think on the whole record, aside from' the difficulty of enforcing an injunction, that the plaintiff is not entitled to an injunction against either defendant for the reason that it made a contract with an infant and the infant can rescind that contract at any time before he becomes of age, and when he retired from the employment of the plaintiff he rescinded the contract and he was clearly within his rights for there was nothing that he got from the plaintiff that he was not called upon to put the other party in statu quo, even if it was the law that he must put the other party in statu quo, which is not true, according to the rule laid down in the case of Lemon vs. Bee-man, supra.

We, therefore, can come to no other conclusion than that there must be a decree entered for the defendants.

Decree for defendants.

Sullivan and Levine, JJ, concur.
#### § 417.217 Overflight gate analysis.

For a launch that involves flight over a populated or other protected area, the flight safety analysis must include an overflight gate analysis. The analysis must establish the portion of a flight safety limit, a gate, through which a normally performing launch vehicle's tracking icon will be allowed to proceed. A tracking icon must enable the flight safety crew to determine whether the launch vehicle's flight is in compliance with the flight safety rules established under § 417.113. When establishing that portion of a flight safety limit, the analysis must demonstrate that the launch vehicle flight satisfies the flight safety requirements of § 417.107.
§ 382.81 For which passengers must carriers make seating accommodations? As a carrier, you must provide the following seating accommodations to the following passengers on request, if the passenger self-identifies to you as having a disability specified in this section and the type of seating accommodation in question exists on the particular aircraft. Once the passenger self-identifies to you, you must ensure that the information is recorded and properly transmitted to personnel responsible for providing the accommodation. ( a ) For a passenger who uses an aisle chair to access the aircraft and who cannot readily transfer over a fixed aisle armrest, you must provide a seat in a row with a movable aisle armrest. You must ensure that your personnel are trained in the location and proper use of movable aisle armrests, including appropriate transfer techniques. You must ensure that aisle seats with movable armrests are clearly identifiable.
( b ) You must provide an adjoining seat for a person assisting a passenger with a disability in the following circumstances: ( 1 ) When a passenger with a disability is traveling with a personal care attendant who will be performing a function for the individual during the flight that airline personnel are not required to perform (*e.g.,* assistance with eating);
( 2 ) When a passenger with a vision impairment is traveling with a reader/assistant who will be performing functions for the individual during the flight;
( 3 ) When a passenger with a hearing impairment is traveling with an interpreter who will be performing functions for the individual during the flight; or
( 4 ) When you require a passenger to travel with a safety assistant (see § 382.29).
( c ) For a passenger with a disability traveling with a service animal, you must provide, as the passenger requests, either a bulkhead seat or a seat other than a bulkhead seat.
( d ) For a passenger with a fused or immobilized leg, you must provide a bulkhead seat or other seat that provides greater legroom than other seats, on the side of an aisle that better accommodates the individual's disability.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1878 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 145) ll-B-47 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 11/28/20081:21:27

PM Sheet 145of 145P. 2 

# A-90-1 9 ll-B-4 7 

# PENDINGCONFIDENTL Y

Th e following informatio n i s locate d i n th e confiden t file s o f th e Director , Emissio n Standard s Division , Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlanning an d Standards , U . S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolina 27711 . Thi s informatio n i s confidentia l pending fina l determinatio n b yth e Administrato r an

d i s no t availabl e fo r publi c inspection . W . Floyd , Radia n Corporation , t o Proces s Vent s Docke t A-90-19 , Decembe r 1990 , HO NNESHAP : Industry Characteristics/Diketene . 2 1 pages . CB I Documen t Contro l No . 86/23 , PPS-47 .
§ 65.17 Tests: General procedure. ( a ) Tests prescribed by or under this part are given at times and places, and by persons, designated by the Administrator.
( b ) The minimum passing grade for each test is 70 percent.
§ 60.1 Applicability. ( a ) This part prescribes the rules governing the initial and continuing qualification and use of all aircraft flight simulation training devices (FSTD) used for meeting training, evaluation, or flight experience requirements of this chapter for flight crewmember certification or qualification.
( b ) The rules of this part apply to each person using or applying to use an FSTD to meet any requirement of this chapter.
( c ) The requirements of § 60.33 regarding falsification of applications, records, or reports also apply to each person who uses an FSTD for training, evaluation, or obtaining flight experience required for flight crewmember certification or qualification under this chapter.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-3773MN

_____________ Katheryn Lynn Critzer, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * v. * * Blue Earth County Housing and * Appeal from the United States Redevelopment; HRA; Public Housing; * District Court for the District City of Mankato; Mary Barrett; * of Minnesota. Roxanne Johnson; Elmo Dodd, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendants-Appellees, * * United States Department of Housing * and Urban Development, * * Defendant. *

_____________ Submitted: May 11, 1998

Filed: May 21, 1998

_____________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, JOHN R. GIBSON, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Katheryn Lynn Critzer appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to a public h ousing authority and others in her lawsuit for discrimination based o n disability. Having considered the record and the parties' submissions, we conclude the-2-

district court correctly granted summary judgment for the reasons given in it s memora ndum opinion and order. We thus affirm without further discussion. See8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The Cockscomb quadrangle, Oregon:7.5-minute series**
 
2012 | 2014 | 2015
 
SuDoc NumberA13.28/6:44118-H 7/:
Item Number:0080-G-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000931998
 
January 24, 2018
EXHIBIT 10.04


 


FIRST AMENDMENT


 


This
First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 31
day of August, 2009 (the “First Amendment Effective Date”) and amends the
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of September 29, 2008
(the “Employment Agreement”), by and between NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC. (“NFM”)
and KEN BOENISH (“Executive”).  Unless
otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used shall have the meaning
ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement.


 


In
consideration of the foregoing, and other good and valuable consideration,
including Executive’s continued employment with NFM, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Executive and NFM hereby agree as
follows:


 


I.              AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENT


 


Section 1
“Term” is hereby amended by deleting such section in its entirety and
replacing the same with the following:


 


“The
Term of this Agreement shall begin as of the First Amendment Effective Date and
shall continue until midnight on August 31, 2013, or such other date as
the Agreement is terminated by either party as hereinafter provided (the “Term”).


 


II.            GENERAL PROVISIONS


 


All
other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement that have not been
specifically amended herein shall remain in full force and effect.  This First Amendment, together with the
Employment Agreement, contains all of the terms and conditions agreed upon by
the parties hereto regarding the subject matter hereof.  All prior agreements, promises, negotiations
and representations, either oral or written, relating to the subject matter of
this First Amendment or the Employment Agreement not expressly set forth in
this First Amendment or the Employment Agreement are of no force or
effect.  Any waiver, alteration or
modification of any of the terms of this First Amendment shall be valid only if
made in writing and signed by both parties hereto. This First Amendment may be
executed in up to two counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original
but together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first
set forth above.


 


 


	
  NEW
  FRONTIER MEDIA, INC.

  	
   

  	
  EXECUTIVE

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:
  

  	
  /s/
  Michael Weiner

  	
   

  	
  By:
  

  	
  /s/
  Ken Boenish

  
	
  Name:
  Michael Weiner

  	
   

  	
  Name:
  Ken Boenish

  
	
  Title:
  Chief Executive Officer
§ 437.23 Program description. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76727 , Sept. 19, 2024.
( a ) An applicant must provide— ( 1 ) Dimensioned three-view drawings or photographs of the reusable suborbital rocket; and
( 2 ) Gross liftoff weight and thrust profile of the reusable suborbital rocket.
( b ) An applicant must describe— ( 1 ) All reusable suborbital rocket systems, including any structural, flight control, thermal, pneumatic, hydraulic, propulsion, electrical, environmental control, software and computing systems, avionics, and guidance systems used in the reusable suborbital rocket;
( 2 ) The types and quantities of all propellants used in the reusable suborbital rocket;
( 3 ) The types and quantities of any hazardous materials used in the reusable suborbital rocket;
( 4 ) The purpose for which a reusable suborbital rocket is to be flown; and
( 5 ) Each payload or payload class planned to be flown.
( c ) An applicant must identify any foreign ownership of the applicant as follows: ( 1 ) For a sole proprietorship or partnership, identify all foreign ownership,
( 2 ) For a corporation, identify any foreign ownership interests of 10% or more, and
( 3 ) For a joint venture, association, or other entity, identify any participating foreign entities.
1. The plat of the survey of an island in Seretha Lake, Township 152 North, Range 27 West, Fifth Principal Meridian, Minnesota, accepted on January 6, 2000, will be officially filed in Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia at 7:30 a.m., on February 22, 2000. The tract shown below describe the island omitted from the original survey.

## Fifth Principal Meridian, Minnesota 

T. 152 N. R. 27 W. 

Tract No. 37.

2. Tract No. 37 is firm land rising 15 ft. above the ordinary high water mark. The soil has evolved from glacial till parent material and is similar to the soil found on the adjacent uplands. Tree species consist of birch, cedar, fir and spruce, ranging in size from 3 to 20 inches in diameter. A White Birch, 20 inches in diameter, located near the center of the island was approximately 90+ years of age. The ground cover consists of alder, hazel, willow and native grasses on the southerly and easterly shore line. 

3. The present water level of the lake compares favorably with that of the original meander line; therefore, the elevation and upland character of the island along with the depth and width of the lake between the adjacent upland and the island are considered evidence that the island did exist in 1858, the year Minnesota was admitted to the Union. The original survey in 1896 did not note the presence of this island. 

4. Tract No. 37 is more than 50 percent upland in character within the interpretation of the Swamp and Overflow Act of September 28, 1850 (9 Stat. 519) as extended to the State of Minnesota under the Act of March 12, 1860 (12 Stat. 3). Therefore, the island is held to be public land. 

5. The survey was requested by the Assistant Field Manager, Division of Natural Resource Management, under the authority of Section 211 of FLPMA (43 U.S.C. 1721) and the Minnesota Public Lands Improvement Act of 1990, P.L. 101-442 (104 Stat. 1020). 

6. Except for valid existing rights, this island will not be subject to application, petition, location or selection under any public law until February 22, 2000. 

7. Interested parties protesting the determination that these islands are public land of the United States, must present valid proof showing that the island in question did not exist at the time of statehood or that it was attached to the mainland at the time of the original survey. Such protests must be submitted in writing to the Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Eastern States, Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153, prior to 7:30 a.m., February 22, 2000. 

Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and prepayment of the appropriate fee. 

Dated: January 6, 2000. 

Stephen G. Kopach, 

Chief Cadastral Surveyor.

[FR Doc. 00-113 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: 1. For miscellaneous amendments to cross references in this 21 see Amdt. 21-10, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear at 74 FR 53384, Oct. 16, 2009.

§ 21.618 Approval for deviation. ( a ) Each manufacturer who requests approval to deviate from any performance standard of a TSO must show that factors or design features providing an equivalent level of safety compensate for the standards from which a deviation is requested.
( b ) The manufacturer must send requests for approval to deviate, together with all pertinent data, to the FAA. If the article is manufactured under the authority of a foreign country or jurisdiction, the manufacturer must send requests for approval to deviate, together with all pertinent data, through the civil aviation authority of that country or jurisdiction to the FAA.
[Docket No. FAA-2006-25877, Amdt. 21-92, 74 FR 53392, Oct. 16, 2009, as amended by Doc. No. FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 21-101, 83 FR 9169, Mar. 5, 2018]