alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### VIRGINIA JOINT STOCK LD BK v CRAWFORD CO FARMERS MUT FIRE INS CO

Ohio Appeals, 3rd Dist, Crawford Co

Decided July 24, 1929

*600Edward J. Myers, Bucyrus, for Land Bank.

Charles Gallinger, Bucyrus, for Insurance Co.

HUGHES, J.

The sole and only question before us, is whether or not this mortgage clause that was attached and made a part of this contract, ,as were the provisions of the constitution and by laws, which are also a part of the contract- and printed thereon, effected a change in favor of the mortgagee whereby it can now make claim for this loss notwithstanding the provisions of the constitution and by laws.

It is shown that the .assessments were paid by the insured and received by the company from the time the policy was issued, until the time of the loss by fire.

We see no difference in principle between this case and the case of Mutual Insurance Company v. Green, .submitted herewith, and the same observation that was made by Judge Davis in the Richards v. Louis Lipp Company case, reported in 69 OS. 359, is quite as appropriate. That is. where the policy has been issued and held in good faith as an indemnity, and where premiums have been paid and received under it, it is not only manifestly unjust, but contrary to settled rules of law to permit the insurance company to set up some clause in the constitution or by-laws of its organization, as a defense to an obligation that it has incurred under this policy with the mortgage clause thereto attached, and the judgment in this case is reversed.

Before Judges Hughes, Justice and Crow.
§ 89.410 Acceptance of a means of compliance. ( a ) A person requesting acceptance of a means of compliance must demonstrate to the Administrator that the means of compliance addresses all of the requirements of subparts D and E of this part, and that any standard remote identification unmanned aircraft or remote identification broadcast module designed and produced in accordance with such means of compliance would meet the performance requirements of subpart D of this part.
( b ) The Administrator will evaluate a means of compliance that is submitted to the FAA and may request additional information or documentation, as needed, to supplement the submission.
( c ) If the Administrator determines the person has demonstrated that the means of compliance meets the requirements of subparts D and E of this part, the FAA will notify the person that the Administrator has accepted the means of compliance.
#### § 49.21 Return of original conveyance.

If a person submitting a conveyance for recording wants the original returned to him, he must submit a true copy with the original. After recording, the copy is kept by the FAA and the original is returned to the applicant stamped with the date and time of recording. The copy must be imprinted on paper permanent in nature, including dates, and signatures, to which is attached a certificate of the person submitting the conveyance stating that the copy has been compared with the original and that it is a true copy.

[Doc. No. 1996, 29 FR 6486, May 19, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 49-1, 31 FR 4499, Mar. 17, 1966]
#### William W. Vaughan et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Vaughan & Company, Appellants, *v.*The State of New York, Respondent.

Decided January 12, 1937.

The remittitur herein is hereby amended by adding thereto the following:

*“*A question under the Federal Constitution was presented and necessarily passed upon by this court. The plaintifis-appellants contended that chapter 643 of the Laws of the State of New York, enacted in 1933, was repugnant to section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. This court held that chapter 643 of the Laws of the State of New York, enacted in 1933, was not repugnant to section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.” (See 272 N. Y. 102.)
TENDER — APPEALS.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

1896.]

Smith, Swing and Cox, JJ.

#### R. S. Storer v. Wm. Bohmann.

Valid Tender in Common Pleas in Case Appealed from Justice Court Where Tender Was made Before Suit but not Made Good Until after Trial.

A valid teuder in the common pleas court, in a case appealed from justice court, where a tender was made before suit was brought before the justice, but not made good previous to the trial, must include not only the interest due on the claim but also the costs before the justice.

*861Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.

Swing, J.

It appears that tender was made before suit was brought before the justice of the peace, but was not made good previous to trial before the justice by bringing the money into court. Swan, at page 820 (10th ed.) says: “The amount of money tendered must be brought into court and deposited with the justice of the peace.” The case went to judgment before the justice and was brought to the common pleas on an appeal, when a tender was again made of the amount of the judgment and was paid into court, but did not include the costs due the plaintiff before the justice. In order to have tendered plaintiff the amount due him it should have included not only the interest due on his claim, but also the •costs due him up to the time of the tender, and this must have included the costs before the justice. This was not done, and therefore the plaintiff was entitled to judgment as to costs.
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Actuate
Corporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge on the date hereof, the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 11, 2011                                        
|                                                             
|/s/    PETER I.
CITTADINI                                    
|Peter I. Cittadini                                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer                        
|(Principal Executive Officer)                                
|                                                             
|/s/    DANIEL A.
GAUDREAU                                    
|Daniel A. Gaudreau                                           
|Senior Vice President, Operations and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Your Medicare benefits.**
 
2012: PDF | Mobi |ePub
 
2013 | 2014: FebAug | 2015 | 2016 | 2018| 2019
2022
 
SuDoc Number:HE 22.52:
Item Number:000932168
CGP systemNumber: 000932168
 
July 26, 2019
§ 5.11 Requirements for production certificate holders that are holders or licensees of a type certificate for the same product. Any person that holds a production certificate issued under part 21 of this chapter for a product for which the person is the holder or licensee of the type certificate for the same product on or before May 28, 2024, must: ( a ) Develop and maintain an organizational system description in accordance with § 5.17 of this subpart.
( b ) Submit an implementation plan in accordance with § 5.19 of this subpart for FAA approval in a form and manner acceptable to the Administrator no later than November 28, 2024.
( c ) Develop an SMS that meets the requirements of this part.
( d ) Implement the SMS in accordance with this part no later than May 28, 2027.
( e ) Make available to the Administrator, upon request, all necessary information and data that demonstrates that the person has an SMS that meets the requirements set forth in this part.
( f ) Maintain the SMS as long as the person is both a holder of a production certificate and a holder or licensee of a type certificate for the same product.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11687]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed During the Week Ending 
April 7, 2000

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. Sections 412 and 414. 
Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the 
application.

    Docket Number: OST-2000-7203.
    Date Filed: April 5, 2000.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

    PTC COMP 0609 dated 31 March 2000
    Mail Vote 074--Resolution 024j
    Special Construction Rules (Amending)
    Intended effective date: 15 April 2000

Andrea M. Jenkins,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 00-11687 Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
Exhibit 10.1



FORM OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT



July 23, 2004



[Executives Name]

[Executives address]



| | Re: | Amendment No. 1 to Executive Agreement dated ,
20
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------



Reference is made to the
Executive Agreement dated , 20 (Agreement), between yourself and Arch
Chemicals, Inc. The reference in Paragraph 3(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended to replace July 30, 2004 everywhere it appears in such paragraph with December 31, 2004 effective immediately. In all other respects, the
Agreement remains in full force and effect without change.



Please indicate in
the space provided below your agreement with this amendment.



Very truly yours,ARCH CHEMICALS, INC.By:Name:Title:




|                          
|--------------------------
|Agreed to and accepted by:
|                          
|
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Medicare basics, a guide forfamilies and friends of people with Medicare.**
 
2007 | 2011: PDFMobiePub
 
SuDoc Number:HE 22.51:
Item Number:0512-A-81 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000932167
 
January 24, 2018
650

700

750

850

650

700

900

900

700

850

800

650

700

800

650

850

650

359

C H O N R A N C H L N

F M 3 0 7 3

S C H R O B L N

Y E A G E R R A N C H R D

M O R R IS L N

A R R O Y O L N

F M 3 0 7 3

359

C H O N R A N C H L N

F M 3 0 7 3

S C H R O B L N

Y E A G E R R A N C H R D

M O R R IS L N

A R R O Y O L N

F M 3 0 7 3

Noriacitas Creek

Noriacitas Creek

Noriacitas Creek

Noriacitas Creek

Yeager

Oil Field

Saint

Joseph Oil

Field

La Fevre

Oil Field

Greenhill

Cemetery

Oilton Bruni

Armstrong

Ranch

Bruni SE

McCampbell

Ranch

Hebbronville Albercas

Ranch

Hebbronville

NW

Thompsonville

FEET

30" 98°45'

27°

30"

22'

27°

98°

15'

22'

30"

15'

45'

50'

50'

98°52'

98°

27°

47'30"

47'

30" 27° 30"

52'

17'

20'

17'30" 30"

20'

17 020 000

E 5 5

30

5

30

5

30

30

000m

30

30

5

30

30

5

30

5

30

5

000m

30

30 30

5

5 5

5

30

30

5

30

5

5

5

30

5

30 30

5

30

5

30

30

000m 5

30

30

30

30

5 5 5

000m

5

27

20

24

20

19

16

22

22

25

15 18

N

19

18

13 17

25

21

24

17

18

N

23

21

14

27

26

23

23

18

24

15

19

24

19

15

26

17

22

E

21

16

17

16

23

13 16

14 20

15 21

20

22

870 FEET

FEET

900

980

000 FEET

000

16 000

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 2798-231

BRUNI SE, TX

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

BRUNI SE QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14R

Imagery......................................................NAIP, April 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2008

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2008

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 5 ́

2 MILS

5° 19 ́

95 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14R

NR

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
§ 61.35 Knowledge test: Prerequisites and passing grades. ( a ) An applicant for a knowledge test must have: ( 1 ) Received an endorsement, if required by this part, from an authorized instructor certifying that the applicant accomplished the appropriate ground-training or a home-study course required by this part for the certificate or rating sought and is prepared for the knowledge test;
( 2 ) For the knowledge test for an airline transport pilot certificate with an airplane category multiengine class rating, a graduation certificate for the airline transport pilot certification training program specified in § 61.156; and
( 3 ) Proper identification at the time of application that contains the applicant's— ( i ) Photograph;
( ii ) Signature;
( iii ) Date of birth, which shows: ( A ) For issuance of certificates other than the ATP certificate with an airplane category multiengine class rating, the applicant meets or will meet the age requirements of this part for the certificate sought before the expiration date of the airman knowledge test report; and
( B ) For issuance of an ATP certificate with an airplane category multiengine class rating obtained under the aeronautical experience requirements of § 61.159 or § 61.160, the applicant is at least 18 years of age at the time of the knowledge test;
( iv ) If the permanent mailing address is a post office box number, then the applicant must provide a current residential address.
( b ) The Administrator shall specify the minimum passing grade for the knowledge test.
[Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16298, Apr. 4, 1997, as amended by Amdt. 61-104, 63 FR 20286, Apr. 23, 1998; Amdt. 61-124, 74 FR 42548, Aug. 21, 2009; Amdt. 61-130, 78 FR 42373, July 15, 2013; Amdt. 61-130B, 78 FR 77573, Dec. 24, 2013; Amdt. 61-149, 86 FR 62087, Nov. 9, 2021]
Exhibit
10.23


 


EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE


BIRDS EYE FOODS MASTER SALARIED
RETIREMENT PLAN


AND


FIFTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE


BIRDS EYE FOODS MASTER HOURLY
PENSION PLAN


 


This Amendment is adopted by
Birds Eye Foods, Inc., a corporation duly formed and existing under and by
virtue of the State of Delaware (referred to herein as the “Employer”).


 


WITNESSETH


 


WHEREAS, the Employer has
adopted the Birds Eye Foods Master Salaried Retirement Plan (the “Retirement
Plan”) which was amended and restated effective January 1, 2001; and


 


WHEREAS, the Employer has
adopted the Birds Eye Foods Master Hourly Plan (the “Pension Plan”) which was
amended and restated effective July 1, 2001; and


 


WHEREAS, the Employer has
taken action to merge the Retirement Plan into the Pension Plan effective April 1,
2007 or as soon thereafter as may be administratively feasible; and


 


WHEREAS, the Employer has
reserved the right to amend the Retirement Plan and the Pension Plan;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the
Retirement Plan and the Pension Plan are hereby amended as follows:


 


1.             The Retirement Plan is merged into the Pension Plan
effective April 1, 2007 or as soon thereafter as is administratively
feasible.


 


2.             Notwithstanding any other provision of the Retirement
Plan or the Pension Plan to the contrary, the accrued benefit of each
participant in the merged plan, determined on a termination basis in accordance
with ERISA section 4044, shall not be less after the merger than immediately
before the merger.


 


3.             Notwithstanding any other provision of the Retirement
Plan or the Pension Plan to the contrary, all optional forms of benefit or
other rights or features available to a participant under the Retirement Plan
or Pension Plan which are protected under the nondiscrimination provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code shall remain available to such participants under the
merged plan.


 


4.             In no event shall the merger of the Retirement Plan
and Pension Plan result in a reduction in the rate of future benefit accrual
under the merged plan.


 

















 


5.             Effective upon the completion of the merger of the
Retirement Plan into the Pension Plan, the name of the merged plan shall be
the:


 


“BIRDS EYE FOODS PENSION PLAN”


 


6.             Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, the
terms and provision of the Retirement Plan and the Pension Plan, as applicable
to the respective participants and beneficiaries of the Retirement Plan and
Pension Plan, shall remain in full force and effect after the effective date of
the completion of the merger.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this
Amendment has been executed this 17th day of April, 2007.


 


	
   

  	
  BIRDS
  EYE FOODS, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/
  Lois Warlick-Jarvie

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:
  Lois Warlick-Jarvie

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title:
  Senior Vice President of Administration

  



 


2
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II

DONALD W. WRIGHT, No. 48829

- 9

- II

Appellant, (consolidated with)

No

. 48882

- 5

- II

v.

WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT

OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Respondent.

W ORSWICK

, P.J.

— Donald Wright appeals the trial court’s February 8, 2016 o rder d enying

n otice of a ppeal, which denied

, as untimely filed

, his notice of appeal from the Department of

Labor and Industries’ November 23, 2015 d ecision and o rder. The Department concedes that there

were significant delays between when the Department issued its dec ision and when Wright

received it

, and between when Wright mailed his notice of appeal and when the trial court received

it, both caused by the prison mail system. It therefore concedes that Wright’s notice of appeal was

timely filed

, and asks that the appeal be remanded to the trial court.

We accept the concession. The trial court’s o rder d enying n otice of a ppeal is reversed and

Wright’s appeal is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Filed

Washington State

Court of Appeals

Division Two

December 20, 2016No. 48829

- 9

- II

Cons. with No. 48882

- 5

- II

2 A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040,

it is so ordered.

Worswick, P.J.

We concur:

Lee, J.

Sutton, J.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________

)

SHIRLEY TABB, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

) Civil Action No. 06-0789 (PLF)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and )

 BRENDA DONALD WALKER, )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

The parties appeared before the Court for a pretrial conference on June 14, 2010. 

For the reasons discussed in open court, the Court has determined that the District of Columbia

must make available to plaintiff information from newly discovered backup tapes of email

correspondence within the Child and Family Services Agency (“CFSA”) for the period February

1, 2005 through December 31, 2005. Plaintiff has made an adequate showing that information

relevant to her claims may exist in the backup tapes for this time period. This decision required

the Court to postpone the trial, which had been scheduled to begin on June 21, 2010 at 9:30 a.m.

The parties are directed to meet and confer, possibly with the assistance of a third

party vendor, to determine the most efficient method of restoring the backup tapes and searching

them — either by using agreed upon search terms or by restricting the search to certain email

custodians — for relevant information. The search shall be consistent with plaintiff’s original

discovery requests. The parties are instructed to design the search and restoration in a manner

that avoids the need to conduct any additional searches of these backup tapes. The District of
Columbia shall bear the cost of this restoration and production because the District is the party

responsible for maintaining this information in an accessible format and because the plaintiff’s

original discovery request was reasonable and timely. 

Upon reaching an agreement as to the method of the restoration and the search,

the District is directed to begin this process as soon as possible, irrespective of the current fiscal

year, in order to avoid further delay of trial. The District may move for a protective order as

needed to protect confidential information contained on the tapes. In addition, it may protect

privileged materials either with a privilege log or by using a clawback procedure. The parties

shall report to the Court with respect to this process at a status conference on June 29, 2010 at

10:30 a.m.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that defendants’ motion for a protective order [56] is DENIED; 

and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to compel [76] is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.

/s/________________________

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

United States District Judge

DATE: June 16, 2010

2