alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4550 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4550

 To amend section 3142 of title 18, United States Code, to establish a 
 rebuttable presumption that a person arrested for rioting or related 
                 offenses should be held pending trial.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 9, 2020

  Mr. Cotton (for himself and Mrs. Loeffler) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 3142 of title 18, United States Code, to establish a 
 rebuttable presumption that a person arrested for rioting or related 
                 offenses should be held pending trial.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Catch-and-Release for Rioters 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION ON HOLDING PERSONS ARRESTED FOR RIOTING 
              PENDING TRIAL.

    Section 3142(e)(3) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(F) an offense under paragraph (1) or (2) of section 
        231(a) or under section 2101.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 155.1 Applicability.

This part applies to releases from terms, conditions, reservations, or restrictions in any deed, surrender of leasehold, or other instrument of transfer or conveyance (in this part called “instrument of disposal”) by which some right, title, or interest of the United States in real or personal property was conveyed to a non-Federal public agency under section 13 of the Surplus Property Act of 1944 (58 Stat. 765; 61 Stat. 678) to be used by that agency in developing, improving, operating, or maintaining a public airport or to provide a source of revenue from non-aviation business at a public airport.
#### § 65.80 Certificated aviation maintenance technician school students.

Whenever an aviation maintenance technician school certificated under part 147 of this chapter shows to the Administrator that any of its students has made satisfactory progress at the school and is prepared to take the oral and practical tests prescribed by § 65.79, that student may take those tests during the final subjects of the student's training in the curriculum required under part 147, before the student meets the applicable experience requirements of § 65.77 and before the student passes each section of the written test prescribed by § 65.75.

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0237; Amdt. No. 65-63, 87 FR 31415, May 24, 2022]
exv10w5





Exhibit
10.5


Restated Second Amendment To

Purchase and Sale Agreement

And Joint Escrow Instructions

(TSG — LITTLE VALLEY)




     THIS RESTATED SECOND AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW
INSTRUCTIONS (this “Restated Amendment”), dated as of October 15, 2009, is by and between TSG
LITTLE VALLEY, LP, a California limited partnership
(“Seller”), and SPT-LAKE ELSINORE HOLDING CO.,
LLC (“Buyer”) (as successor-in-interest by assignment to Shopoff Advisors, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership), and amends that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions
dated as of September 30, 2008, as previously amended (as amended, the “Agreement”). Capitalized
terms used herein shall have the meanings given them in the Agreement. This Restated Amendment
corrects and supersedes that certain Second Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement between Seller
and Buyer of even date herewith.



     Seller and Buyer agree to amend the Agreement as follows:



     Two Million Nine Hundred Thousand Dollars ($2,900,000.00) of the Purchase Price shall be paid
by Buyer’s execution and delivery into Escrow of (i) an All-Inclusive Purchase Money Note Secured
by Deed of Trust in favor of Seller as Payee therein, in the principal amount of Two Million Nine
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($2,900,000.00), and (ii) an All-Inclusive Deed of Trust executed by Buyer
in favor of Seller as Beneficiary therein, securing the foregoing All-Inclusive Purchase Money
Note.



     In all other respects the Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Restated Amendment as of the date first
above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Seller:	 	TSG LITTLE VALLEY, L.P., a California limited partnership
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	 	Portfolio Partners, Inc., a California Corporation
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/ Stevan J. Gromet 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Stevan J. Gromet, President
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Buyer:	 	SPT-LAKE ELSINORE HOLDING CO., LLC, a Delaware

limited liability company
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	 	Shopoff Partners,L.P., a Delaware limited partnership,

sole member
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	By:	 	Shopoff General Partner, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, general partner
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	By:	 	Shopoff Properties Trust, Inc., a

Maryland corporation, manager
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/ William A. Shopoff 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	William A. Shopoff,
 President and CEO
KUPREANOF

DOUGLAS

NAUKATI

HAINES

HOONAH

SITKA

PELICAN

ELFIN COVE

GUSTAVUS

G

U

L

F

O

F

A

LA

S

KA

DIXON ENTRANCE

HOLLIS

HYDABURG

KETCHIKAN

THORNE

BAY

CLARENCE

STRAIT

WRANGELL

PETERSBURG

CRAIG

KLAWOCK

COFFMAN 

COVE

WHALE 

PASS

EDNA

BAY

PT. BAKER 

PORT PROTECTION

SUMNER

STRAIT

PORT

ALEXANDER

KAKE

U

NITE

D

STATE

S

CANADA

FREDERICK

SOUND

TENAKEE 

SPRINGS

CHATHAM

STRAIT

ST

E

P

H

E

N

S

PAS

SAG

E

ANGOON

JUNEAU

LY

N

N

C

A

N

AL

SKAGWAY

UNITED

STATES

CANADA

YAKUTAT

YAKUTAT BAY

Yukon

Bri

Territory

tish Columbia

SAXMAN

MEYERS

CHUCK

METLAKATLA

KASAAN

Tongass National Forest

Land and Resource

Management Plan

Suitable Land

November 2015

A

l a

s

k a

Canada

Tongass

 National

 Forest

Bering Sea

Arctic Ocean

Russia

Alaska

Gulf of

DRAFT EIS

Alternative 2

United States Department of Agriculture

Forest Service

Alaska Region

Tongass National Forest

Ketchikan, Alaska

/

0 5 10 20 30 40

Miles

Document Path: R:\Projects_2014\TNF_FP_Amendment\FPAmendment08\GIS\MapProducts\DEIS\Alt2_SuitableAreas.mxd

Glacier Bay National Park

Suitable Old Growth

Suitable Young Growth

Non-development LUD

Water

Non-Federal Land

BLM-managed Land

Haines State Forest

Klondike Gold Rush National Historic Park

Development LUD
# EUR-Lex - 31994Y0823(03) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31994Y0823(03)

**Council conclusions of 17 June 1994 concerning greater cooperation in the field of archives **

*
Official Journal C 235 , 23/08/1994 P. 0003 - 0003 *

COUNCIL CONCLUSIONS of 17 June 1994 concerning greater cooperation in the field of archives (94/C 235/03)

The Council considers that archives constitute a significant part of the cultural heritage of European significance referred to in Article 128 of the Treaty establishing the European Community. The exploitation of archives can contribute to achieving the aim, also provided for in Article 128, of improvement of the knowledge of the culture and history of the European peoples.

It notes with interest the report on archives forwarded by the Commission and prepared by a group of experts further to its resolution of 14 November 1991 on arrangements concerning archives. Further to that report, it agrees on the importance of greater cooperation between the Member States and at Community level in the field of archives.

The Council calls upon the Commission to include archives in the communication which it has undertaken to make on the Community's cultural heritage and notes with interest among the actions contemplated in the report those relating to the following points:

- organizing a multidisciplinary forum to be held in the framework of the Community on the problems of the management, storage, conservation and retrieval of machine-readable data, inviting public administrations and national archives services, as well as representatives of industry and of research, to take part in the forum,

- stimulating, in conjunction with the Member States, exchanges of students and archivists via Community action programmes in the field of education and vocational training, or by other means,

- preparing and encouraging the publication in all the official languages of the Community of a practical guide to the procedures and other provisions in force in the Member States and in the Institutions for user-access to their archives,

- preparing and encouraging the publication of appropriate technical publications intended to disseminate research carried out and any research findings concerning the preservation and restoration of archives documents and material,

- using different technologies, encourage the publication of information with regard to archives material.

The Commission could obtain the technical assistance of the Member States in examining these points and use the expertise existing in non-governmental organizations such as the International Council on Archives.
§ 91.1023 Program operating manual requirements. ( a ) Each program manager must prepare and keep current a program operating manual setting forth procedures and policies acceptable to the Administrator. The program manager's management, flight, ground, and maintenance personnel must use this manual to conduct operations under this subpart. However, the Administrator may authorize a deviation from this paragraph if the Administrator finds that, because of the limited size of the operation, part of the manual is not necessary for guidance of management, flight, ground, or maintenance personnel.
( b ) Each program manager must maintain at least one copy of the manual at its principal base of operations.
( c ) No manual may be contrary to any applicable U.S. regulations, foreign regulations applicable to the program flights in foreign countries, or the program manager's management specifications.
( d ) The program manager must make a copy of the manual, or appropriate portions of the manual (and changes and additions), available to its maintenance and ground operations personnel and must furnish the manual to— ( 1 ) Its crewmembers; and
( 2 ) Representatives of the Administrator assigned to the program manager.
( e ) Each employee of the program manager to whom a manual or appropriate portions of it are furnished under paragraph (d)(1) of this section must keep it up-to-date with the changes and additions furnished to them.
( f ) The program manager must ensure the appropriate parts of the manual are accessible to flight, ground, and maintenance personnel at all times when such personnel are performing their assigned duties.
( g ) The information and instructions contained in the manual must be displayed clearly and be retrievable in the English language.
( h ) Program managers that are also certificated to operate under part 121 or 135 of this chapter may be authorized to use the operating manual required by those parts to meet the manual requirements of subpart K, provided: ( 1 ) The policies and procedures are consistent for both operations, or
( 2 ) When policies and procedures are different, the applicable policies and procedures are identified and used.
[Docket No. FAA-2001-10047, 68 FR 54561, Sept. 17, 2003, as amended by Docket No. FAA-2022-0912; Amdt. No. 91-368, 88 FR 34443, May 30, 2023]
§ 31.19 Performance: Uncontrolled descent. ( a ) The following must be determined for the most critical uncontrolled descent that can result from any single failure of the heater assembly, fuel cell system, gas value system, or maneuvering vent system, or from any single tear in the balloon envelope between tear stoppers: ( 1 ) The maximum vertical velocity attained.
( 2 ) The altitude loss from the point of failure to the point at which maximum vertical velocity is attained.
( 3 ) The altitude required to achieve level flight after corrective action is inititated, with the balloon descending at the maximum vertical velocity determined in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) Procedures must be established for landing at the maximum vertical velocity determined in paragraph (a)(1) of this section and for arresting that descent rate in accordance with paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
[Amdt. 31-4, 45 FR 60179, Sept. 11, 1980]
§ 417.15 Records. ( a ) A launch operator must maintain all records necessary to verify that it conducts licensed launches according to representations contained in the licensee's application. A launch operator must retain records for three years after completion of all launches conducted under the license.
( b ) If a launch accident or launch incident occurs, as defined by § 401.5 of this chapter, a launch operator must preserve all records related to the event until completion of any Federal investigation and the FAA advises the licensee not to retain the records. The launch operator must make available to Federal officials for inspection and copying all records that these regulations require the launch operator to maintain.
[Docket No. FAA-2000-7953, 71 FR 50537, Aug. 25, 2006, as amended by Amdt. No. 417-5, 81 FR 59439, Aug. 30, 2016]
##### 



Exhibit 10.2*  Form 20F 2004 Las Vegas From Home.com MODIFICATION TO LICENSE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTOF FEBRUARY 17, 2005 This Modification is entered into this 6th day of May, 2005, by and between
1st Technology LLC (hereinafter 1st Technology) and LasVegasFromHome.com Entertainment, Inc.
(hereinafter LVFH.com). WHEREAS, 1st Technology and LVFH.com entered into a License and Settlement Agreement,
incorporated herein by this reference, in settlement of 1st Technology LLC v.
LasVegasFromHome.com Entertainment, Inc., et al., Case No. CV-S-04-1003-RLH-PAL (the Lawsuit),
under which the Lawsuit was dismissed and a license was granted to LVFH.com by 1st Technology in
exchange for license fees paid on an agreed upon payment schedule; WHEREAS, 1st Technology and LVFH.com have agreed to accelerate payments from the agreed upon
payment schedule; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises made herein and for
other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree to modify the License and Settlement
Agreement as follows:  A.
    
    LVFH.com agrees to pay to 1st Technology in a manner stated in Section IV of the License and
Settlement Agreement a sum of ninety thousand dollars ($90,000.00) (Final Payment) by wire
transfer initiated on or before May 10, 2005.  B.
    
    1st Technology agrees to accept the Final Payment made in accordance with the terms of Part A
herein, in exchange for a full and complete release and satisfaction of all remaining royalty
obligations, fixed and contingent, owed under the License and Settlement Agreement, including
all initial royalty obligation, additional royalty obligation, and further additional
royalty obligation as those terms are used in the License and Settlement Agreement, as if
LVFH.com had paid all fixed and potential
    contingent royalty amounts under the original terms of the License and Settlement Agreement.




---



##### 



C.
    
    By this Modification, Section V of the License and Settlement Agreement shall be deleted in
its entirety from the terms of the License and Settlement Agreement and Modification, and
shall have no force or effect after this Modification.D.
    
    To the extent that the language of Parts A, B, or C herein modifies, amends, or contradicts
the License and Settlement Agreement, the language of Parts A, B, and C herein shall supercede
the License and Settlement Agreement.E.
    
    The remaining portions of the License and Settlement Agreement not specifically modified by
Parts A, B, or C herein shall continue in full force and effect. 1ST TECHNOLOGY LLC  Dated: By:   LASVEGASFROMHOME.COM ENTERTAINMENT, INC.  Dated: By:
#### DUWAMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS v. UNITED STATES

[79 C. Cls. 530; 295 U. S. 755]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court May 27, 1935.
§ 437.87 Records. ( a ) Except as required by paragraph (b) of this section, a permittee must maintain for 3 years all records, data, and other material necessary to verify that a permittee conducted its launch or reentry in accordance with its permit.
( b ) For any event that meets any of paragraphs (1) through (3), (5), or (8) of the definition of “mishap” in § 401.7 of this chapter, a permittee must preserve all records related to the event. Records shall be retained until any Federal investigation is complete and the FAA advises the permittee that the records need not be retained.
( c ) A permittee must make all records that it must maintain under this section available to Federal officials for inspection and copying.
[Docket No. FAA-2006-24197, 72 FR 17019, Apr. 6, 2007, as amended by Docket No. FAA-2019-0229, Amdt. 437-3, 85 FR 79718, Dec. 10, 2020]
§ 77.29 Evaluating aeronautical effect. ( a ) The FAA conducts an aeronautical study to determine the impact of a proposed structure, an existing structure that has not yet been studied by the FAA, or an alteration of an existing structure on aeronautical operations, procedures, and the safety of flight. These studies include evaluating: ( 1 ) The impact on arrival, departure, and en route procedures for aircraft operating under visual flight rules;
( 2 ) The impact on arrival, departure, and en route procedures for aircraft operating under instrument flight rules;
( 3 ) The impact on existing and planned public use airports;
( 4 ) Airport traffic capacity of existing public use airports and public use airport development plans received before the issuance of the final determination;
( 5 ) Minimum obstacle clearance altitudes, minimum instrument flight rules altitudes, approved or planned instrument approach procedures, and departure procedures;
( 6 ) The potential effect on ATC radar, direction finders, ATC tower line-of-sight visibility, and physical or electromagnetic effects on air navigation, communication facilities, and other surveillance systems;
( 7 ) The aeronautical effects resulting from the cumulative impact of a proposed construction or alteration of a structure when combined with the effects of other existing or proposed structures.
( b ) If you withdraw the proposed construction or alteration or revise it so that it is no longer identified as an obstruction, or if no further aeronautical study is necessary, the FAA may terminate the study.
#### Annie Rosenthal, as Administratrix of the Estate of Max Rosenthal, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, Appellant.

Argued January 12, 1937;

decided January 26, 1937.

*523
      *James D. Ewing*for appellant.

*David Schneir*and *Leon Wasserman*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Lottghran and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: Finch, J.
§ 91.1041 Aircraft proving and validation tests. ( a ) No program manager may permit the operation of an aircraft, other than a turbojet aircraft, for which two pilots are required by the type certification requirements of this chapter for operations under VFR, if it has not previously proved such an aircraft in operations under this part in at least 25 hours of proving tests acceptable to the Administrator including— ( 1 ) Five hours of night time, if night flights are to be authorized;
( 2 ) Five instrument approach procedures under simulated or actual conditions, if IFR flights are to be authorized; and
( 3 ) Entry into a representative number of en route airports as determined by the Administrator.
( b ) No program manager may permit the operation of a turbojet airplane if it has not previously proved a turbojet airplane in operations under this part in at least 25 hours of proving tests acceptable to the Administrator including— ( 1 ) Five hours of night time, if night flights are to be authorized;
( 2 ) Five instrument approach procedures under simulated or actual conditions, if IFR flights are to be authorized; and
( 3 ) Entry into a representative number of en route airports as determined by the Administrator.
( c ) No program manager may carry passengers in an aircraft during proving tests, except those needed to make the tests and those designated by the Administrator to observe the tests. However, pilot flight training may be conducted during the proving tests.
( d ) Validation testing is required to determine that a program manager is capable of conducting operations safely and in compliance with applicable regulatory standards. Validation tests are required for the following authorizations: ( 1 ) The addition of an aircraft for which two pilots are required for operations under VFR or a turbojet airplane, if that aircraft or an aircraft of the same make or similar design has not been previously proved or validated in operations under this part.
( 2 ) Operations outside U.S. airspace.
( 3 ) Class II navigation authorizations.
( 4 ) Special performance or operational authorizations.
( e ) Validation tests must be accomplished by test methods acceptable to the Administrator. Actual flights may not be required when an applicant can demonstrate competence and compliance with appropriate regulations without conducting a flight.
( f ) Proving tests and validation tests may be conducted simultaneously when appropriate.
( g ) The Administrator may authorize deviations from this section if the Administrator finds that special circumstances make full compliance with this section unnecessary.
FILED

November 19, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

OCTOBER 1998 SESSION

WILLIAM C. HIGHTOWER, )

) NO. 01C01-9802-CC-00081

Appellant, )

) WILLIAMSON COUNTY

VS. )

) HON. DONALD P. HARRIS,

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) JUDGE

)

Appellee. ) (Sentencing)

)

) AFFIRMED - RULE 20

O R D E R

Appellant, William C. Hightower, appeals the trial court's denial of his motion

to correct an illegal sentence. The trial court previously revoked his probation and

ordered an effective eight-year sentence to run consecutively to a fifteen-year

Alabama sentence. 

Appellant previously appealed his probation revocation and unsuccessfully

argued this very issue. The fact that appellant is now attacking his sentence under

the guise of a motion to correct an illegal sentence does not detract from this

Court's previous ruling that consecutive sentencing was proper. Appellant is bound

by that ruling. We reiterate that "Hightower's contention that the trial court erred by

requiring the Tennessee sentences to be served consecutively to the Alabama

sentences is without merit. The trial court is authorized to run such sentences

consecutively pursuant to T.C.A. § 40-35-310. Consecutive sentencing is justified

under the facts." State v. William Hightower, C.C.A. No. 01C01-9507-CC-00234,

Williamson County (Tenn. Crim. App. filed January 16, 1997, at Nashville)(no

permission to appeal sought).

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee
Court of Criminal Appeals. It appearing that the appellant is indigent, costs shall be

taxed to the state. 

So ordered. Enter:

_______________________

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE 

CONCUR:

________________________

PAUL G. SUMMERS, JUDGE

________________________

JOSEPH M. TIPTON, JUDGE