alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4492 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4492

   To provide the Food and Drug Administration with mandatory recall 
                    authority for all drug products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 6, 2020

  Mr. Peters introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide the Food and Drug Administration with mandatory recall 
                    authority for all drug products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Drugs Act''.

SEC. 2. PROVIDING FDA WITH MANDATORY RECALL AUTHORITY.

    Section 569D of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
360bbb-8d) is amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``controlled substances'' 
        and inserting ``drugs'';
            (2) by striking ``controlled substance'' each place such 
        term appears and inserting ``drug''; and
            (3) in subsection (b), by striking ``controlled 
        substances'' and inserting ``drugs''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Gloria Sanchez, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Defendants, and Mystic Transportation, Inc., Respondent.

[698 NYS2d 670]

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered July 21, 1998, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted the motion of defendant Mystic Transportation, Inc. (Mystic) to preclude plaintiff, pursuant to CPLR 3126 (2), from offering or relying on photographs at trial to prove negligence on the part of Mystic or from introducing evidence as to any claim for special damages against Mystic, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff’s numerous and unexplained failures to comply with longstanding and still outstanding discovery obligations justify the inference that her noncompliance with discovery has been willful and contumacious (see, *Cano v BLF Realty Holding Corp.,*243 AD2d 390; *Glasburgh v Port Auth.,*193 AD2d 441). Accordingly, the IAS Court properly precluded plaintiff, pursuant to CPLR 3126 (2), from introducing or from relying upon the aforementioned evidence in her case against Mystic. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4549 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4549

   To give Federal courts additional discretion to determine whether 
     pretrial detention is appropriate for defendants charged with 
          nonviolent drug offenses in Federal criminal cases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 9, 2020

    Mr. Durbin (for himself, Mr. Lee, and Mr. Coons) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To give Federal courts additional discretion to determine whether 
     pretrial detention is appropriate for defendants charged with 
          nonviolent drug offenses in Federal criminal cases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Smarter Pretrial Detention for Drug 
Charges Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. RELEASE CONDITIONS AND DETENTION IN FEDERAL CRIMINAL CASES.

    Section 3142 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(42 U.S.C. 14135a)'' each place it 
        appears and inserting ``(34 U.S.C. 40702)''; and
            (2) in subsection (e)(3)--
                    (A) by striking subparagraph (A); and
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (B), (C), (D), 
                and (E) as subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D), 
                respectively.
                                 <all>
```
§ 65.15 Duration of certificates. ( a ) Except for repairman certificates, a certificate or rating issued under this part is effective until it is surrendered, suspended, or revoked.
( b ) Unless it is sooner surrendered, suspended, or revoked, a repairman certificate is effective until the holder is relieved from the duties for which the holder was employed and certificated.
( c ) The holder of a certificate issued under this part that is suspended, revoked, or no longer effective shall return it to the Administrator.
( d ) Except for temporary certificates issued under § 65.13, the holder of a paper certificate issued under this part may not exercise the privileges of that certificate after March 31, 2013.
[Doc. No. 22052, 47 FR 35693, Aug. 16, 1982, as amended by Amdt. 65-51, 73 FR 10668, Feb. 28, 2008]
§ 25.772 Pilot compartment doors. For an airplane that has a lockable door installed between the pilot compartment and the passenger compartment: ( a ) For airplanes with a maximum passenger seating configuration of more than 20 seats, the emergency exit configuration must be designed so that neither crewmembers nor passengers require use of the flightdeck door in order to reach the emergency exits provided for them; and
( b ) Means must be provided to enable flight crewmembers to directly enter the passenger compartment from the pilot compartment if the cockpit door becomes jammed.
( c ) There must be an emergency means to enable a flight attendant to enter the pilot compartment in the event that the flightcrew becomes incapacitated.
[Doc. No. 24344, 55 FR 29777, July 20, 1990, as amended by Amdt. 25-106, 67 FR 2127, Jan. 15, 2002]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Glendale quadrangle, Oregon :7.5-minute series (topographic)**
 
2012 | 2014 | 2015 | 2017
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28/6:42123-F 4/
Item Number:0080-G-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000932193
 
January 26, 2018
Order entered July 25, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00059
- CR WILLIE DESHUN WADE, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Ju dicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F17
- 75793
- R



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s July 23, 2018 second motion to extend the time to file appellant’s brief. We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or before August 13, 2018 . If appellant’s brief is not filed by August 13, 2018, this appeal may be abated for the trial court to make findings in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 38.8.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
###### Editorial Note on Part 221

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 221.111 Notification of rejection.

When a tariff is rejected, the issuing carrier or agent thereof will be notified electronically or in writing that the tariff is rejected and of the reason for such rejection.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SunCoast Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, John T. Stafford, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                                                        
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ John T. Stafford                                   
|                   |  |     |  | John T. Stafford, President and Chief Executive
Officer
#### Irving U. Scott, Appellant, *v.*Henry A. Palmer, Respondent.

Argued November 30, 1936;

decided December 31, 1936.

*472
      *H. C. Stratton*and *Ralph W. France*for appellant.

*Willard R. Pratt*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
exv10w32






Exhibit 10.32




2009 Director Fees




     Independent director Board fees for 2009 are as follows:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Retainer
	 	$	150,000	 
	Committee Chair Annual Retainer:  
	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee
	 	$	25,000	 
	Compensation Committee
	 	$	15,000	 
	Fee for serving on Audit Committee (other than the Committee Chair)
	 	$	10,000	 






     Beginning in May 2009, the annual Board fees are payable quarterly in advance.



     In addition to the Board fees described above, in July 2009, the Governance and Compliance
Committee of the Board of Directors approved 2009 compensation for Lynn Krominga serving as lead
director commencing in May 2009 of $50,000. The lead director fee was ratified by the Board of
Directors in August 2009. Ms. Krominga had previously received an additional fee of $100,000 for
serving as non-executive chair of the Board from March 2008 to November 2008, which was recommended
by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board in May 2008. Ms. Krominga abstained from
voting on these additional fee arrangements.
#### § 91.1411 Continuous airworthiness maintenance program use by fractional ownership program manager.

Fractional ownership program aircraft may be maintained under a continuous airworthiness maintenance program (CAMP) under §§ 91.1413 through 91.1443. Any program manager who elects to maintain the program aircraft using a continuous airworthiness maintenance program must comply with §§ 91.1413 through 91.1443.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D22-1950

LT Case No. 2020-CF-1001

_____________________________

GERALD W. MILLS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County.

David B. Eddy, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Ryan M. Belanger, 

Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. 

Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee.

November 7, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EISNAUGLE, BOATWRIGHT, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 93 (Friday, May 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11946]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Newspapers Used for Publication of Legal Notice of Appealable 
Decisions for the Northern Region; Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, and 
Portions of South Dakota and Eastern Washington.

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists the newspapers that will be used by all 
Ranger Districts, Forests, and the Regional Office of the Northern 
Region to publish legal notice of all decisions subject to appeal under 
36 CFR 215 and 217 and to publish notices for public comment and notice 
of decision subject to the provisions of 36 CFR 215 and 217 and to 
publish notices for public comment and notice of decision subject to 
the provisions of 36 CFR 215. The intended effect of this action is to 
inform interested members of the public which newspapers will be used 
to publish legal notices for public comment or decisions; thereby 
allowing them to receive constructive notice of a decision, to provide 
clear evidence of timely notice, and to achieve consistency in 
administering the appeals process.

DATES: Publication of legal notices in the listed newspapers will begin 
with decisions subject to appeal that are made on or after May 15, 
2000. The list of newspapers will remain in effect until another notice 
is published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Interregional NEPA, Appeals and 
Litigation Leader; Northern Region; P.O. Box 7669; Missoula, Montana 
59807. Phone: (406) 329-3647.
    The newspapers to be used are as follows:

Northern Regional Office

    Regional Forester decisions in Montana: The Missoulian, Great Falls 
Tribune, and The Billings Gazette.
    Regional Forester decisions in Northern Idaho and Eastern 
Washington: The Spokesman Review.
    Regional Forester decisions in North Dakota: Bismarck Tribune.
    Regional Forester decisions in South Dakota: Rapid City Journal.
    Beaverhead/Deerlodge--Montana Standard.
    Bitterroot--Ravalli Republic.
    Clearwater--Lewiston Morning Tribune.
    Custer--Billings Gazette (Montana) Rapid City Journal (South 
Dakota).
    Dakota Prairie National Grasslands--Bismarck Tribune (North Dakota) 
Rapid City Journal (South Dakota).
    Flathead--Daily Interlake.
    Gallatin--Bozeman Chronicle.
    Helena--Independent Record.
    Idaho Panhandle--Spokesman Review.
    Kootenai--Daily Interlake.
    Lewis & Clark--Great Falls Tribune.
    Lolo--Missoulian.
    Nez Perce--Lewiston Morning Tribune.
    Supplemental notices may be placed in any newspaper, but time 
frames/deadlines will be calculated based upon notices in newspapers of 
record listed above.

    Dated: May 7, 2000.
Kathleen A. McAllister,
Deputy Regional Forester.
[FR Doc. 00-11946 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
RIA Executive Summary
12/15/2011 01:47 PM

From: Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>, Margo_Schwab@omb.eop.gov

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim DeMocker/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Bcc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US

Cortney and Margo,

Attached is the revised Executive Summary, as requested.

Thank you!

Amy Lamson Risk and Benefits Group Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards US Environmental Protection Agency 109 TW Alexander Dr. (C439-02) Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: (919) 541-4383 Fax: (919) 541-0839

Executive Summary_Interagencyco mmentsunderEO13563 12.15.11.docx
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 93 (Friday, May 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11982]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 00-048]


Notice of Prospective Patent License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of prospective patent license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that East3.com, LLC, of Richmond, VA, 
has applied for an exclusive license to practice the inventions 
described and claimed in U.S. Patent Number 5,377,100, entitled ``A 
METHOD OF ENCOURAGING ATTENTION BY CORRELATING VIDEO GAME DIFFICULTY 
WITH ATTENTION LEVEL,'' and NASA Case No. LAR 15817-1, entitled ``A 
METHOD OF ENCOURAGING PHYSIOLOGICAL SELF-REGULATION THROUGH MODULATION 
OF AN OPERATOR'S CONTROL INPUT TO A VIDEO GAME OR TRAINING SIMULATOR,'' 
both of which are assigned to the United States of America as 
represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration. Written objections to the prospective grant of a 
license should be sent to Langley Research Center.

DATES: Responses to this notice must be received by July 11, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen M. Galus, Patent Attorney, 
Langley Research Center, Mail Code 212, Hampton, VA 23681-2199; 
telephone 757-864-3227; facsimile 757-864-9190.

    Dated: May 1, 2000.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 00-11982 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
Order entered October 30, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-14-01347-CV

IN RE KEVIN MENNIEFEE, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 86th District Court Kaufman County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 28736A-86



### ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD
JUSTICE
Summary of Analytical Results

(662 - March 2011)

 Sample ID 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB Date 3/7/11 3/14/11 3/21/11 3/28/11 Top (ft) 0000 Total (T)/ Bottom (ft) 0000

Analyte units Diss. (D) Duplicate # 1111

PFOA ug/L T 4.92 7.01 17.5 8.17

Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services. Reported results  collected on 3/7/11 represents the average of duplicate results.

PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acidug/L = micrograms per Liter

 represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 3/7/11. Aceptable precision was obtained and the reported result for the sample

< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1

cwk
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-11119 Summary Calendar

AHMAD CARDELL HOUSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MOLLEE WESTFALL, Prosecutor; SCOTT WISCH, Judge, Defendant’s-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CV-466-A

-------------------- December 12, 2001 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ahmad Cardell Houston appeals the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, which the district court construed as an application for habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Houston filed his complaint against a state prosecutor and judge, alleging that they violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial. Although at the time he filed his complaint Houston was a pretrial detainee in the Tarrant County Jail, the recordNo. 01-11119 -2- indicates that he was released from custody at the time he filed his notice of appeal. Accordingly, Houston is not entitled to habeas relief. See Dickerson v. Louisiana , 816 F.2d 220, 224 (5th Cir. 1987)("to be eligible for habeas relief, a petitioner must be ‘in custody’”). Because the state record has not been included in the record on appeal, this court cannot evaluate the current status of Houston’s case or determine whether a speedy trial violation has occurred. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal on the alternate ground that Houston has failed to establish a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Sojourner T v. Edwards , 974 F.2d 27, 30 (5th Cir. 1992).
AFFIRMED.
# EUR-Lex - 31996R2304 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996R2304

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2304/96 of 29 November 1996 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2273/93 determining the intervention centres for cereals **

*
Official Journal L 311 , 30/11/1996 P. 0047 - 0047 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2304/96 of 29 November 1996 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2273/93 determining the intervention centres for cereals

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organization of the market in cereals (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 923/96 (2), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas the intervention centres are listed in the Annex to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2273/93 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2627/95 (4); whereas Finland has requested the amendment of that Annex; whereas that request should be granted;

Whereas the date for the opening of intervention in Finland is 1 November;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex, under 'SUOMI`, to Regulation (EEC) No 2273/93 is hereby amended as follows:

- 'Naantali` is replaced by 'Turku`,

- 'Koria` becomes 'Koria-Kouvola`.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 1 November 1996.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 November 1996.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 181, 1. 7. 1992, p. 21.

(2) OJ No L 126, 24. 5. 1996, p. 37.

(3) OJ No L 207, 18. 8. 1993, p. 1.

(4) OJ No L 269, 11. 11. 1995, p. 7.