alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 65.113 Eligibility requirements: General. ( a ) To be eligible for a parachute rigger certificate, a person must— ( 1 ) Be at least 18 years of age;
( 2 ) Be able to read, write, speak, and understand the English language, or, in the case of a citizen of Puerto Rico, or a person who is employed outside of the United States by a U.S. air carrier, and who does not meet this requirement, be issued a certificate that is valid only in Puerto Rico or while he is employed outside of the United States by that air carrier, as the case may be; and
( 3 ) Comply with the sections of this subpart that apply to the certificate and type rating he seeks.
( b ) Except for a master parachute rigger certificate, a parachute rigger certificate that was issued before, and was valid on, October 31, 1962, is equal to a senior parachute rigger certificate, and may be exchanged for such a corresponding certificate.
# EUR-Lex - 31996D0386 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996D0386

**96/386/EC: Council Decision of 26 February 1996 concerning the conclusion of Memoranda of Understanding between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and between the European Community and the Republic of India on arrangements in the area of market access for textile products **

*
Official Journal L 153 , 27/06/1996 P. 0047 - 0047 *

COUNCIL DECISION of 26 February 1996 concerning the conclusion of Memoranda of Understanding between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and between the European Community and the Republic of India on arrangements in the area of market access for textile products (96/386/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community and in particular Article 113 in conjunction with the first sentence of Article 228 (2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas, in the framework of the GATT market access negotiations, the Commission conducted negotiations with the Republic of India and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan in the area of market access for textile products;

Whereas Memoranda of Understanding between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and between the European Community and the Republic of India on arrangements in the said area were initialled on 15 October and 31 December 1994 respectively;

Whereas these Memoranda should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Memoranda of Understanding between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and between the European Community and the Republic of India on arrangements in the area of market access for textile products are hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The texts of the Memoranda are attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorized to designate the person empowered to sign the Memoranda referred to in Article 1 in order to bind the Community.

Done at Brussels, 26 February 1996.

For the Council

The President

S. AGNELLI
§ 29.321 General. ( a ) The flight load factor must be assumed to act normal to the longitudinal axis of the rotorcraft, and to be equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the rotorcraft inertia load factor at the center of gravity.
( b ) Compliance with the flight load requirements of this subpart must be shown— ( 1 ) At each weight from the design minimum weight to the design maximum weight; and
( 2 ) With any practical distribution of disposable load within the operating limitations in the Rotorcraft Flight Manual.
#### § 35.42 Components of the propeller control system.

The applicant must demonstrate by tests, analysis based on tests, or service experience on similar components, that each propeller blade pitch control system component, including governors, pitch change assemblies, pitch locks, mechanical stops, and feathering system components, can withstand cyclic operation that simulates the normal load and pitch change travel to which the component would be subjected during the initially declared overhaul period or during a minimum of 1,000 hours of typical operation in service.

[Amdt. 35-8, 73 FR 63349, Oct. 24, 2008]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)

**Title:**  Coalbednatural gas exploration, drilling, activities, and test results 2007-2010,Wainwright, Alaska /

 
**SuDoc****Number  
[if !vml]>[endif]>I 19.76:2014-1004
**Item Number  
[if !vml]>[endif]>0624-H (online)
**CGPSystem****Number  
000927049
 
Plate 1

Plate 2

�******
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11747]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Maritime Administration


Marine Transportation System National Advisory Council

ACTION: National Advisory Council Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Maritime Administration announces that the Marine 
Transportation System National Advisory Council (MTSNAC) will hold its 
first meeting to discuss the Council's role in attaining the desired 
MTS and formulate an initial Council Action Plan. A public comment 
period is scheduled for 2:45 to 3:15. To provide time for as many 
people to speak as possible, speaking time for each individual will be 
limited to three minutes. Members of the public who would like to speak 
are asked to contact Kathleen Dunn by May 22, 2000. Commenters will be 
placed on the agenda in the order in which notifications are received. 
If time allows, additional comments will be permitted. Oral comments 
must be submitted in writing at the meeting. Additional written 
comments are welcome and must be filed by June 8, 2000.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Wednesday May 24, 2000, from 8:30 AM 
to 5 PM.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in Ballrooms A and B of the 
Commonwealth Ballroom of the Holiday Inn and Suites, Historic District 
Alexandria, 625 First Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen R. Dunn, (202) 366-2307; 
Maritime Administration, MAR 810, Room 7209, Washington, DC 20590; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#337852475b5f56565d1d77465d5d735e524152571d575c471d545c45"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="753e14011d1910101b5b31001b1b3518140714115b111a015b121a03">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. App 2, Sec.9(a)(2); 41 CFR 101-6.1005; DOT 
Order 1120.3B.

    Dated: May 5, 2000.
Joel C. Richard,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-11747 Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IC 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 439 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 23, 2019 

Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

AN ACT 

To allow Members of Congress to opt out of the Federal 

Employees Retirement System, and allow Members who 

opt out of the Federal Employees Retirement System 

to continue to participate in the Thrift Savings Plan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

S 439 RFH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Members of Congress 

3 Pension Opt Out Clarification Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MAKING FERS OPTIONAL FOR MEMBERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.— 

6 (1) AMENDMENT.—Section 8401(20) of title 5, 

7 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘, and 

8 who (in the case’’ and all that follows through 

9 ‘‘2004’’. 

10 (2) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by 

11 paragraph (1) shall apply with respect to an indi12 vidual who first serves as a Member of the House 

13 of Representatives, including a Delegate or Resident 

14 Commissioner to the Congress, on or after the date 

15 of enactment of this Act. 

16 (b) CONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN TSP.— 

17 (1) AMENDMENT.—Section 8401(20) of title 5, 

18 United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), 

19 is further amended— 

20 (A) by striking ‘‘term ‘Member’ has’’ and 

21 inserting the following: ‘‘term ‘Member’— 

22 ‘‘(A) has’’; 

23 (B) by inserting ‘‘, subject to subpara24 graph (B),’’ after ‘‘except that’’; 

25 (C) by adding ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon at 

26 the end; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

S 439 RFH

1 (D) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(B) for purposes of subchapter III, has the 

3 same meaning as provided in section 2106, without 

4 regard to whether the individual elects not to partici5 pate in the Federal Employees’ Retirement Sys6 tem;’’. 

7 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT TO TSP.—Sec8 tion 8431(a) of title 5, United States Code, is 

9 amended by inserting ‘‘except as provided in section 

10 8401(20)(B),’’ after ‘‘subchapter,’’. 

11 (3) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made 

12 by this subsection shall apply with respect to an in13 dividual who makes an election described in section 

14 8401(20) of title 5, United States Code, not to par15 ticipate in the Federal Employees’ Retirement Sys16 tem before, on, or after the date of enactment of this 

17 Act. 

Passed the Senate December 19, 2019. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001062506
<NAME>                        ATLANTICA, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           4,743
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        2,458
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    (1,256,700)
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                14,756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 1,392,900
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    1,348,144
<EPS-BASIC>                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.05)



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 24, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40862 

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAUL CARBAJAL-ADAME; VICTOR

ARCOS-BENITEZ

Defendants-Appellants.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:05-CR-701-2

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

A jury convicted Raul Carbajal-Adame (Carbajal) and Victor

Arcos-Benitez (Arcos) of conspiracy to possess with intent to

distribute cocaine and the district court sentenced each

defendant to a 121-month term of imprisonment. Carbajal argues

on appeal that the evidence is insufficient to support his

conviction, while Arcos argues that the district court erred by

refusing to accept Arcos’s guilty plea.

Although Carbajal moved for a judgment of acquittal at the

close of the Government’s case-in-chief and again at the close of
No. 06-40862

-2-

the defense evidence, he did not renew the motion at the close of

the Government’s rebuttal evidence. Accordingly, we review the

evidence only to determine whether there has been a manifest

miscarriage of justice. United States v. Green, 293 F.3d 886,

895 (5th Cir. 2002). Because the trial evidence supports the

jury’s determination that Carbajal conspired to possess cocaine

with the intent to distribute it, we affirm his conviction.

Because Arcos denied any involvement with illegal drugs at

his rearraignment hearing, the district court did not err by

refusing to accept his guilty plea. United States v. Cano-Guel,

167 F.3d 900, 906 (5th Cir. 1999); FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(b)(3). 

U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a)(1). Furthermore, Arcos has failed to show

that acceptance of his guilty plea after trial commenced would

have made him eligible for a reduction in offense level under the

advisory Sentencing Guidelines. See U.S.S.G. §§ 3E1.1(a)(1),

5C1.2(a); United States v. Sanchez-Ruedas, 452 F.3d 409, 414 (5th

Cir. 2006). Thus, any error resulting from the court’s refusal

to allow Arcos to enter a guilty plea after the jury was

empaneled was harmless. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 52(a). 

AFFIRMED.
Editorial Note on Part 399
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 399 appear at 84 FR 15947, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 399.81 Unrealistic or deceptive scheduling. ( a ) The unrealistic scheduling of flights by any air carrier providing scheduled passenger air transportation is an unfair or deceptive practice and an unfair method of competition within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. 41712.
( b ) With respect to the advertising of schedule performance, it is an unfair or deceptive practice and an unfair method of competition to use any figures purporting to reflect schedule or on-time performance without indicating the basis of the calculation, the time period involved, and the pairs of points or the percentage of system-wide operations thereby represented and whether the figures include all scheduled flights or only scheduled flights actually performed.
( c ) *Chronically delayed flights.* ( 1 ) This paragraph (c) applies to any air carrier that is a “reporting carrier” as defined in Part 234 of Department regulations (14 CFR Part 234).
( 2 ) For the purposes of this paragraph (c), a chronically delayed flight means any domestic flight that is operated at least 10 times a month, and arrives more than 30 minutes late (including cancelled flights) more than 50 percent of the time during that month.
( 3 ) For purposes of this paragraph (c), the Department considers all of a carrier's flights that are operated in a given city-pair market whose scheduled departure times are within 30 minutes of the most frequently occurring scheduled departure time to be one single flight.
( 4 ) The holding out of a chronically delayed flight for more than four consecutive one-month periods represents one form of unrealistic scheduling and is an unfair or deceptive practice and an unfair method of competition within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. 41712.
[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2007-0022, 74 FR 69003, Dec. 30, 2009; Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15947, Apr. 16, 2019]
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, William P. Eckman, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





|Date: August 14, 2003 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    WILLIAM P.
ECKMAN
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |
#### Bank of Michigan *vs.*Jessup.

ALBANY»

August, 1837.

A *foreign corporation*must give *security for costs*in suits prosecuted here; if they omit to do so and their proceedings are sought to be set aside, they will be relieved on filing security and paying costs of motion.

Motion to set aside the proceedings of the plaintiffs, being a *foreign corporation,*for that the suit was commenced *without giving security for the payment of costs. 2*R. S. 457, § 1, Since notice of this motion security had been filed.

*By the Court,*Nelson, Ch. J.

The plaintiffs were irregular in prosecuting the suit without giving security ; having now complied with the statute, the motion is denied on payment of costs.
§ 29.483 One-wheel landing conditions. For the one-wheel landing condition, the rotorcraft is assumed to be in the level attitude and to contact the ground on one aft wheel. In this attitude— ( a ) The vertical load must be the same as that obtained on that side under § 29.479(b)(1); and
( b ) The unbalanced external loads must be reacted by rotorcraft inertia.
#### In the Matter of Katie Cutrie, Respondent; 664 Bay Ridge Avenue Corporation, Appellant.

Submitted March 3, 1937;

decided March 23, 1937.

*611
      *Michael M. Helfgott, Jacob Schechner*and *Mitchell J. Levin*for appellant.

*Milton Hertz*and *Charles Wilson*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Lottghran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1725

CHALTU ASSEFA WAKENE, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE; JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A77-892-871) Submitted: May 22, 2003 Decided: June 4, 2003 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mikre-Michael Ayele, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wendtland, Assistant Director, Ann Carroll Varnon, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Chaltu Assefa Wakene, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”). The order denied her motion to reopen the Board’s dismissal of her appeal from the immigration judge’s order denying her applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Wakene’s motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2003); INS v. Doherty , 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. SeeIn re: Wakene , No. A77-892-871 (B.I.A. June 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### § 61.211 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes the requirements for the issuance of ground instructor certificates and ratings, the conditions under which those certificates and ratings are necessary, and the limitations upon those certificates and ratings.
Exhibit 10.52
                                  AMENDMENT TO
                       EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN
                   THE NEPTUNE SOCIETY, INC. AND MARCO MARKIN


The parties to the above  referenced  Employment  Agreement  dated as of June 6,
2001 (the "Agreement") hereby agree to the following amendments.

     1.   That Article 2. Term,  of the Agreement be amended to reflect that the
          term of the  agreement  shall be extended by an  additional  two years
          ending  December  31,  2007.  All other items in this  Article 2 shall
          remain the same.

     2.   Article 5.  Compensation  and Related  Matters,  be amended to reflect
          that the Executive at his election,  may receive  common shares of the
          Company's  capital stock in lieu of cash for all Deferred Salary.  The
          rate of conversion will be calculated  using a thirty (30) day average
          trading price for the Company's common shares and applying a ten (10%)
          discount to this price for rate of conversion.

The foregoing is hereby  agreed to and accepted this 10th day of February,  2003
by:

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE NEPTUNE SOCIETY, INC.


     Illegible
-----------------------------


AGREED AND ACCEPTED BY MARCO MARKIN


/s/ Marco Markin
-----------------------------