alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         70,128
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22,423
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,293
<PP&E>                                         113,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                 22,141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,308,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,444,048
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    52
<COMMON>                                      1,504
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,631,872
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,308,726
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  540,385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (540,385)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (540,385)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (540,385)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.04)
        




</TABLE>
[No. 49586-1-I.

Division One.

December 23, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Darius Paige, et al., *Defendants,*Allen Sinclair, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 01-1-00957-1, Jeffrey M. Ramsdell, J., entered October 28, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
#### § 714.9 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of SunCoast Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John T. Stafford, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                 |  | 
|----- |  | --------------- |  | 
|Date: |  | August 12, 2003 |  | 
|      |  |                 |  |
#### § 103.1 Colleges and universities.

The Board will assert its jurisdiction in any proceeding arising under sections 8, 9, and 10 of the Act involving any private nonprofit college or university which has a gross annual revenue from all sources (excluding only contributions which, because of limitation by the grantor, are not available for use for operating expenses) of not less than $1 million.

[35 FR 18370, Dec. 3, 1970]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 94 (Monday, May 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12051]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 00-052]


NASA Advisory Council, Life and Microgravity Sciences and 
Applications Advisory Committee, NASA-NIH Advisory Subcommittee on 
Biomedical and Behavioral Research Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Life and Microgravity 
Sciences and Applications Advisory Committee, NASA-NIH Advisory 
Subcommittee on Biomedical and Behavioral Research.

DATES: Thursday, June 8, 2000, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Headquarters, 
300 E Street, SW, MIC-3, Room 3H46, Washington, DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Joan Vernikos, Code UL, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-
0220.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--Action Status
--NASA Update
--NASA Life Sciences Division Update
--LSAS and LMSAAC Reports
--NIH/NASA Program Announcement
--Joint Workshops Update
--NASA/NIH Three-Dimensional Tissue Culture Center
--Discussions and Review of Findings and Recommendations

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.
    Visitors will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: May 9, 2000.
Matthew M. Crouch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-12051 Filed 5-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.2

                           SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



I Michael J. Wallace, the Chief Financial Officer of Intrepid Capital
Corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

         1.       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
                  period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Periodic Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 14, 2002

                                     /s/ Michael J. Wallace
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Michael J. Wallace, Chief Financial Officer

                                      20
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 1, 2017

No. 04-17-00039-CR

Michael RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR2993

Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s attorney has filed a motion seeking access to a portion of the record that is 

sealed. The motion is GRANTED, and appellant’s attorney is directed to contact the Clerk of this 

court to make arrangements to review the sealed record. If appellee desires access to the sealed 

record at a later date, appellee must contact the Clerk of this court to make the necessary 

arrangements. All parties and their attorneys are ORDERED: (1) to fully comply with the 

instructions provided by the Clerk of this court regarding their access to the sealed record; and 

(2) not to share the contents of the sealed record with any person.

Additionally, we previously issued an order stating that this appeal would be dismissed 

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification 

showing appellant has the right to appeal was made part of the appellate record by April 10, 

2017. We subsequently granted appellant’s motion for filing of the reporter’s record. The 

reporter’s record has now been filed. We, therefore, extend the deadline for filing any amended 

trial court certification. It is ORDERED that this appeal will be dismissed under Rule 25.2(d)

unless an amended trial court certification showing appellant has the right to appeal is made part 

of the appellate record on or before June 2, 2017. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of May, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
180907 ORD GRANTING WIDERANGE EXT.DOCX VERSION SEPTEMBER 7, 2018 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

 as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et 

al., 

Debtors.1

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered) 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

 as representative of 

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER 

AUTHORITY (PREPA), 

 Debtor. 

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17 BK 4780-LTS 

This Order shall be filed in both the 

lead Case No. 17-BK-3283-LTS 

and Case No. 17-BK-4780-LTS. 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION IN COMPLIANCE WITH ORDER 

RELATED TO WIDERANGE CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR RELIEF OF STAY

 The Court has received and reviewed the Joint Motion in Compliance with Order 

Related to Widerange Corporation’s Motion for Relief of Stay (Docket Entry No. 3896 in Case 

No. 17-3283 and Docket Entry No. 952 in Case No. 17-4780, the “Motion”) filed by counsel to 

 

1

 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing 

Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) 

Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 

BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747) (Title III case numbers are listed 

as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3902 Filed:09/07/18 Entered:09/07/18 16:52:50 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
180907 ORD GRANTING WIDERANGE EXT.DOCX VERSION SEPTEMBER 7, 2018 2 

Widerange Corporation. The Motion is hereby granted. The parties shall file the joint status 

report no later than October 7, 2018 at 4:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time). 

 This Order resolves Docket Entry No. 3896 in Case No. 17-3283 and Docket 

Entry No. 952 in Case No. 17-4780. 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 7, 2018 

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

 LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

 United States District Judge 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3902 Filed:09/07/18 Entered:09/07/18 16:52:50 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
From: Jordan, Deborah

Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 4:42 PM

To: Wehling, Jefferson; Ungvarsky, John

Subject: December 3, 2014, conversation with Larry Greene

On December 3, 2014, Larry Greene confirmed during a telephone conversation that he strongly favors 

our finalizing our action on Sacramento’s ozone plan without revising at this time the “safety margin” in 

the 2018 NOx motor vehicle emissions budget.

His conclusion followed a brief discussion of the various means by which we may handle a problem with 

the “safety margin,” should it arise.
#### William E. Woollard, Appellant, *v.*Schaffer Stores Company, Inc., Respondent, Impleaded with Another.

Submitted January 25, 1937;

decided March 2, 1937.

Motion for a reargument and to amend the remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 272 N. Y. 304.)
#### § 102.76 Petition; who may file; where to file; contents.

When picketing of an employer has been conducted for an object proscribed by Section 8(b)(7) of the Act, a petition for the determination of a question concerning representation of the employees of such employer may be filed in accordance with the provisions of §§ 102.60 and 102.61, insofar as applicable, except that if a charge under § 102.73 has been filed against the labor organization on whose behalf picketing has been conducted, the petition will not be required to contain a statement that the employer declines to recognize the petitioner as the representative within the meaning of Section 9(a) of the Act; or that the union represents a substantial number of employees; or that the labor organization is currently recognized but desires certification under the Act; or that the individuals or labor organizations who have been certified or are currently recognized by the employer are no longer the representative; or, if the petitioner is an employer, that one or more individuals or labor organizations have presented to the petitioner a claim to be recognized as the exclusive representative of the employees in the unit claimed to be appropriate.

[82 FR 11764, Feb. 24, 2017]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

DONAVAN THOMAS CULPS,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 20

- 30241

D.C. No. 1:18

- cr

- 02023

- SAB

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Stanley A. Bastian, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Donavan Thomas Culps appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty

- plea conviction , life sentence, and restitution order for

second

- degree murder , in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1111, 1153. Pursuant to

Anders v. Ca lifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Culps ’s counsel has filed a brief stating

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 30241

that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record. We have provided Culps the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental

brief. No pro se sup plemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
§ 65.103 Repairman certificate: Privileges and limitations. ( a ) A certificated repairman may perform or supervise the maintenance, preventive maintenance, or alteration of aircraft or aircraft components appropriate to the job for which the repairman was employed and certificated, but only in connection with duties for the certificate holder by whom the repairman was employed and recommended.
( b ) A certificated repairman may not perform or supervise duties under the repairman certificate unless the repairman understands the current instructions of the certificate holder by whom the repairman is employed and the manufacturer's instructions for continued airworthiness relating to the specific operations concerned.
( c ) This section does not apply to the holder of a repairman certificate (light-sport aircraft) while that repairman is performing work under that certificate.
[Doc. No. 18241, 45 FR 46738, July 10, 1980, as amended by Amdt. 65-45, 69 FR 44879, July 27, 2004]
Editorial Note on Part 380
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 380 appear at 84 FR 15940, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 380.10 Public Charter requirements. Public Charters under this part shall meet the following requirements: ( a ) - ( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) If the charter is on a round-trip basis, the departing flight and returning need not be performed by the same direct air carrier.
( d ) The air transportation portion of the charter must be performed by direct air carriers that hold authority under Chapter 411 and 413 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII, or are operating under 14 CFR part 298, except that only U.S. citizen direct air carriers may provide air transportation for operations in interstate air transportation.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3772

To include Nelson County and Franklin County, Virginia, in the Appalachian 

region for purposes of the programs of the Appalachian Regional Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2004

Mr. GOODE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To include Nelson County and Franklin County, Virginia, 

in the Appalachian region for purposes of the programs 

of the Appalachian Regional Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF NELSON COUNTY AND FRANK4 LIN COUNTY, VIRGINIA, IN THE APPA5 LACHIAN REGION. 

6 Section 14102(a)(1)(L) of title 40, United States 

7 Code, is amended—

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘Franklin,’’ after ‘‘Floyd,’’; 

9 and 
2

•HR 3772 IH 

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘Nelson,’’ after ‘‘Mont2 gomery,’’.

Æ
#### § 323.1 Applicability.

This part applies to certificated air carriers who terminate or suspend service to a point, or in a market, and to all air carriers who terminate, suspend, or reduce service below the level of essential air service under 49 U.S.C. 41731-41742.

[Doc. No. 82, 50 FR 2430, Jan. 16, 1985, as amended by Doc. No. OST-96-1269, 61 FR 19165, May 1, 1996]
§ 93.63 General rules: Merrill segment. ( a ) No person may operate an aircraft at an altitude between 600 feet MSL and 2,000 feet MSL in that portion of this segment lying north of the midchannel of Knik Arm.
( b ) Each person operating an airplane at a speed of more than 105 knots within this segment (except for that part described in paragraph (a) of this section) shall operate that airplane at an altitude of at least 1,200 feet MSL until maneuvering for a safe landing requires further descent.
( c ) Each person operating an airplane at a speed of 105 knots or less within this segment (except for that part described in paragraph (a) of this section) shall operate that airplane at an altitude of at least 900 feet MSL until maneuvering for a safe landing requires further descent.
( d ) Whenever the Merrill ATCT is not operating, each person operating an aircraft either in that portion of the Merrill segment north of midchannel of Knik Arm, or in the Seward Highway segment at or below 1200 feet MSL, shall contact Anchorage Approach Control for wake turbulence and other advisories. Aircraft operating within the remainder of the segment should self-announce intentions on the Merrill Field CTAF.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 

 

April 6, 2018 

Order 

 

Clerk 

April 6, 2018 

157095 

BENJAMIN CIOTTI, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 157095 

v COA: 332792 

 Wayne CC: 13-013366-NI 

ANDRE HARRIS and A. D. 

TRANSPORTATION EXPRESS, INC., 

 Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of the application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DALE R. MITCHELL,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

SPENCER FOX; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-35099

D.C. No. 2:12-cv-05150-RMP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Rosanna Malouf Peterson, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 18, 2014** 

Before: LEAVY, FISHER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Dale R. Mitchell, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that

prison officials destroyed and confiscated his religious property in violation of the

First Amendment and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act

FILED

DEC 5 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
(“RLUIPA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo,

Shakur v. Schriro, 514 F.3d 878, 883 (9th Cir. 2008), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Mitchell

failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants’ actions

substantially burdened his ability to exercise his religion. See Hernandez v.

Comm’r, 490 U.S. 680, 699 (1989) (in order to establish a First Amendment free

exercise violation, plaintiff must show that defendants substantially burdened the

practice of his religion); Warsoldier v. Woodford, 418 F.3d 989, 994 (9th Cir.

2005) (under RLUIPA, prisoner has the initial burden to demonstrate a prima facie

claim that prison policies constitute a substantial burden on the exercise of his

religious beliefs); see also Freeman v. Arpaio, 125 F.3d 732, 737 (9th Cir. 1997)

(to be constitutionally significant, the burden placed on free exercise “must be

more than an inconvenience”), abrogated on other grounds as recognized in

Shakur, 514 F.3d at 884-85.

Mitchell’s motion, filed June 27, 2014, is denied as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED.

2 14-35099
§ 97.5 Bearings, courses, tracks, headings, radials, miles. ( a ) All bearings, courses, tracks, headings, and radials in this part are magnetic, unless otherwise designated.
( b ) RVR values are stated in feet. Other visibility values are stated in statute miles. All other mileages are stated in nautical miles.
[Doc. No. 561, 32 FR 13912, Oct. 6, 1967, as amended by Amdt. 97-1336, 72 FR 31680, June 7, 2007]