alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 91.1609 Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 114—Prohibition Against Certain Flights in the Damascus Flight Information Region (FIR) (OSTT). ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to the following persons: ( 1 ) All U.S. air carriers and U.S. commercial operators;
( 2 ) All persons exercising the privileges of an airman certificate issued by the FAA, except when such persons are operating U.S.-registered aircraft for a foreign air carrier; and
( 3 ) All operators of U.S.-registered civil aircraft, except when the operator of such aircraft is a foreign air carrier.
( b ) *Flight prohibition.* Except as provided in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, no person described in paragraph (a) of this section may conduct flight operations in the Damascus Flight Information Region (FIR) (OSTT).
( c ) *Permitted operations.* This section does not prohibit persons described in paragraph (a) of this section from conducting flight operations in the Damascus Flight Information Region (FIR) (OSTT), provided that such flight operations are conducted under a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement with a department, agency, or instrumentality of the U.S. government (or under a subcontract between the prime contractor of the department, agency, or instrumentality and the person described in paragraph (a) of this section) with the approval of the FAA, or under an exemption issued by the FAA. The FAA will consider requests for approval or exemption in a timely manner, with the order of preference being: First, for those operations in support of U.S. government-sponsored activities; second, for those operations in support of government-sponsored activities of a foreign country with the support of a U.S. government department, agency, or instrumentality; and third, for all other operations.
( d ) *Emergency situations.* In an emergency that requires immediate decision and action for the safety of the flight, the pilot in command of an aircraft may deviate from this section to the extent required by that emergency. Except for U.S. air carriers and commercial operators that are subject to the requirements of 14 CFR part 119, 121, 125, or 135, each person who deviates from this section must, within 10 days of the deviation, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays, submit to the responsible Flight Standards office a complete report of the operations of the aircraft involved in the deviation, including a description of the deviation and the reasons for it.
( e ) Expiration. This SFAR will remain in effect until December 30, 2028. The FAA may amend, rescind, or extend this SFAR, as necessary.
[Docket FAA-2017-0768, Amdt. 91-348, 82 FR 40949, Aug. 29, 2017; Amdt. 91-348A, 82 FR 42592, Sept. 11, 2017, as amended by Amdt. No. 91-348B, 83 FR 63414, Dec. 10, 2018; Amdt. No. 91-348C, 85 FR 75845, Nov. 27, 2020; Amdt. No. 91-348D, 88 FR 89300, Dec. 27, 2023]
#### Zack T. Paramore, Appellant, v. Lucy Paramore, Appellee.

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court for Jackson County.

*587Calhoun & Campbell, for Appellant.

D. L. McKinnon, for Appellee.

Appeal dismissed October 31st, 1911, on motion of counsel for Appellee.
§ 63.51 Eligibility requirements; general. To be eligible for a flight navigator certificate, a person must— ( a ) Be at least 21 years of age;
( b ) Be able to read, write, speak, and understand the English language;
( c ) Hold at least a second-class medical certificate issued under part 67 of this chapter within the 12 months before the date he applies; and
( d ) Comply with §§ 63.53, 63.55, and 63.57.
**Exhibit 23.2** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration    Statements    No. 33-141825    on    Form S-4,No. 333-122809    on    Form S-8,    and Nos.    333-127759    and    333-127760    on    Form S-3    of FairPoint Communications, Inc. of our report dated    February 22, 2008, relating to the financial statements of    Orange County-Poughkeepsie Limited Partnership as of    December 31, 2007 and 2006, and for each of the three years    in the period ended December 31, 2007 (which report    expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory    paragraph regarding affiliate revenues), appearing in this    Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of FairPoint Communications, Inc. for the year ended    December 31, 2007.     /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP     Atlanta, Georgia    February 28, 2008
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 130430(40) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 130430 

 COA: 255574 
 Wayne CC: 03-014112

TEJUAN LAWRENCE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 31, 2006 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

d1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
Date: June 24 , 20 1 1

Subject: Telephone Call with Bath Iron Works Shipyard o n the Potential Impact of

Adopting Coating Limits based on California Air Resources Board Regulations Shipbuilding and Ship Repair (Surface Coating) RTR RTI Project No. 021 2783 .013

From: Dave Reeves , RTI International

To: Tina Ndoh

OAQPS/SPPD/

NR G (D243

- 02) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

I. Contact

M s

. S tephanie Carver Environmental Engineer

– Bath Iron Works Shipyard Bath, ME ( 20 7 ) 442

– 1274

II. Summary of Information

I called Bath Iron Works (BIW) to get input on the possibility of using the California Air Resources Board (CARB) coating limits for ship coatings across the country. M s

. Carver provided the following comments. She stated that BIW would have significant problems meeting

some of the coating limits due to the winter weather conditions in Maine compared to California.

Cold

- climate painting requires more thinning and sometimes special equipment to keep the paint

from fr eezing in the pots and transfer lines.

BIW does outside ship painting year round and they typically experience cold weather conditions (below 40 ° F) 4 or 5 months a year (November through March or April). Ms Carver

also commented that t hey use a lot of preconstruction primers and general use paints. They also work with coating suppliers to evaluate new products that would dry quicker and have also looked at higher solids and ultra

- high solid formulations.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 94 (Monday, May 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12067]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Department of Defense Wage Committee; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that closed 
meetings of the Department of Defense Wage Committee will be held on 
June 6, 2000, June 13, 2000, June 20, 2000, and June 27, 2000, 2000, at 
10 a.m. in Room A105, the Nash Building, 1400 Key Boulevard, Rosslyn, 
Virginia.
    Under the provisions of section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, the 
Department of Defense has determined that the meetings meet the 
criteria to close meetings to the public because the matters to be 
considered are related to internal rules and practices of the 
Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered were 
obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee that 
the data will be held in confidence.
    However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to 
submit material in writing to the chairman concerning matters believed 
to be deserving of the Committee's attention.
    Additional information concerning the meetings maybe obtained by 
writing to the Chairman, Department of Defense Wage Committee, 4000 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000.

    Dated: May 8, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-12067 Filed 5-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 00-38] 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives,

Transmittal 00-38, with attached transmittal and policy justification.

      ( print page 30959)    
Dated: May 8, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 30960)          ( print page 30961)          ( print page 30962)    

[FR Doc. 00-12068 Filed 5-12-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50104 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CHARLES DOUGLAS BOYENS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-96-CR-532-H

- - - - - - - - - - April 30, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Charles Douglas Boyens appeals his guilty-plea conviction for one count of felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Boyens argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. He has failed to meet his burden to establish a fair and just reason for the withdrawal of his guilty plea. See United States v. Carr , 740 F.2d 339, 343-44 (5th Cir. 1984). The record of Boyens’ guilty-plea hearing shows that his guilty plea was knowing andNo. 97-50104 -2- voluntary. See United States v. Abreo , 30 F.3d 29, 31 (5th Cir. 1994) (testimony in open court is entitled to a strong presumption of verity). We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and affirm substantially for the reasons given by the district court. See United States v. Boyens , EP-96-CR-532-H (W.D. Tex. Jan. 29, 1997). Although, based on Boyens’ letter to the court stating that he wanted to go to trial but was having trouble communicating with his attorney, we do not agree with the district court’s finding that Boyens delayed 24 days before filing his motion to withdraw, this does not alter our determination that under the totality of the circumstances Boyens has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in denying the motion to withdraw his guilty plea. United States v. Hurtado , 846 F.2d 995, 997 (5th Cir. 1988).
AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register: April 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 68)]
[Notices]               
[Page 18170-18171]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr09ap10-57]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

[CFDA Number 84.295A]

 
Ready-to-Learn Television Program

AGENCY: Office of Innovation and Improvement, Department of Education.

ACTION: Notice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year 
(FY) 2010; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On March 22, 2010, we published in the Federal Register (75 FR 
13515) a notice inviting applications for new awards for FY 2010 for 
the Ready-to-Learn Television Program. There is an error in one of the 
dates in that notice.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice corrects the meeting date for 
prospective applicants as follows:

Correction

    On page 13518, in the first column, under Notice of Intent to 
Apply, second paragraph, line six, replace the date ``April 8, 2010'' 
with the date ``April 15, 2010.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Ready-to-Learn Television Program, 
U.S. Department of Education, 400

[[Page 18171]]

Maryland Avenue, SW., room 4W414, Washington, DC 20202 or by e-mail: 
readytolearn@ed.gov.
    If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf, call the 
Federal Relay Service, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
    Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as 
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal 
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the 
Internet at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister. To 
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at 
this site.

    Note: The official version of this document is the document 
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the 
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal 
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/index.html.


    Dated: April 5, 2010.
James H. Shelton, III,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement.
[FR Doc. 2010-8168 Filed 4-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
```
#### In the Matter of New York Credit Men’s Association, Inc., Appellant, against Jacob Schneider et al., Defendants, and Dora Schneider, Respondent.

Argued March 5, 1937;

decided March 23, 1937.

*Charles Gottlieb*for appellant.

*Ludwig M. Wilson*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Christian Faith Missionary Baptist Church

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00057

- CV

Trial court case number: 2012

- 73452

Trial court: 127th District Court of Ha rris County

On February 5, 2014, counsel for Real Parties in Interest filed a Motion of Extension of

Time to File Response. The motion is GRANTED . The response of Real Parties in Interest to

the Petition for Writ of Mandamus, if any, is due March 3, 201 4.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

X Act ing individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 20, 2014
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

39–011 2014

113th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 113–125 

ADDITIONAL DEPLOYMENT OF U.S. MILITARY 

PERSONNEL IN IRAQ 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

A NOTIFICATION OF FURTHER MEASURE IN RESPONSE TO THE 

SITUATION IN IRAQ 

JUNE 26, 2014.—Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 

ordered to be printed 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with HEARINGE:\Seals\Congress.#13

dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with HEARING
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, June 26, 2014 

Hon. JOHN BOEHNER, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: As I reported on June 16, 2014, U.S. Armed 

Forces personnel have deployed to Iraq to provide support and security for U.S. personnel and the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. 

I have since ordered further measures in response to the situation in Iraq. Specifically, as I announced publicly on June 19, I 

have ordered increased intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance that is focused on the threat posed by the Islamic State of 

Iraq and the Levant (ISIL). I also ordered up to approximately 300 

additional U.S. Armed Forces personnel in Iraq to assess how we 

can best train, advise, and support Iraqi security forces and to establish joint operations centers with Iraqi security forces to share 

intelligence and coordinate planning to confront the threat posed 

by ISIL. Some of these personnel were already in Iraq as part of 

the U.S. Embassy’s Office of Security Cooperation, and others 

began deploying into Iraq on June 24. These forces will remain in 

Iraq until the security situation becomes such that they are no 

longer needed. 

This action is being undertaken in coordination with the Government of Iraq and has been directed consistent with my responsibility to protect U.S. citizens both at home and abroad, and in furtherance of U.S. national security and foreign policy interests, pursuant to my constitutional authority to conduct U.S. foreign relations and as Commander in Chief and Chief Executive. 

I am providing this report as part of my efforts to keep the Congress fully informed, consistent with the War Powers Resolution 

(Public Law 93–148). I appreciate the support of the Congress in 

these actions. 

Sincerely, 

BARACK OBAMA. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4193 Filed:11/07/18 Entered:11/07/18 15:54:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4193 Filed:11/07/18 Entered:11/07/18 15:54:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4193 Filed:11/07/18 Entered:11/07/18 15:54:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4193 Filed:11/07/18 Entered:11/07/18 15:54:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4193 Filed:11/07/18 Entered:11/07/18 15:54:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4193 Filed:11/07/18 Entered:11/07/18 15:54:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 6 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4193 Filed:11/07/18 Entered:11/07/18 15:54:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 7 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4193 Filed:11/07/18 Entered:11/07/18 15:54:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 8 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4193 Filed:11/07/18 Entered:11/07/18 15:54:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 9 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4193 Filed:11/07/18 Entered:11/07/18 15:54:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 10 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4193 Filed:11/07/18 Entered:11/07/18 15:54:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 11 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:4193 Filed:11/07/18 Entered:11/07/18 15:54:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 12 of 12
###### Editorial Note on Part 399

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 399 appear at 84 FR 15947, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 399.83 Unfair or deceptive practice of air carrier, foreign air carrier, or ticket agent in orally confirming to prospective passenger reserved space on scheduled flights.

It is the policy of the Department to consider the practice of an air carrier, foreign air carrier, or ticket agent, of stating to a prospective passenger by telephone or other means of communication that a reservation of space on a scheduled flight in air transportation is confirmed before a passenger has received a ticket specifying thereon his confirmed reserved space, to be an unfair or deceptive practice and an unfair method of competition in air transportation or the sale thereof within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. 41712, unless the tariff of the particular air carrier or foreign air carrier provides for confirmation of reserved space by the means so used.

[PS-58, 39 FR 38096, Oct. 29, 1974, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15948, Apr. 16, 2019]
DEPARTMENTSBETHE INTERIOR

U UNITED STATES “GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
. 164° 30°

165° 00° iene
65°15" id 7 ~T
4
|
|
|
[ZS = dE
~$' 8 ,
¢
’
|
4
Y
|
?

65°00" |

>
|
|
} |
°
|
§
5 &
ge

RECON D oso

GAMMAS
er

LN

7
HORIZONTAL SCALE - ~-----~-~-_163,360 | < &
164°00
sre tne a ani RBORNE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS IN SEWARD
CONTOUR INTERVAL. = 20 GAMMA | 6 |
20 GAMMA CONTOUR____________ Se 2 =—+— SERPENTINE HOT SPRINGS °
cae AREA
~_ esas | —___}.s
AMMA tts | <OUGAROK
100 6 CONTOUR == “— rey ! ° . 2 3 4 MILES
MAGNETIC LOw----__---_-_--_-- Qo ° ss =! E = k ———
| i
MAGNETIC MAXIMUM / MINIMUM x: 947 rcs poe, - 1969
SURVEY ALTITUDE ___--_-_______ 2,500° ASL Te 49 , ETAILED LOCATION OF
P YY NDEX MAP SHOWING DETAIL \TION C

FLIGHT LINE--________ RECONNAISSANCE oo =. 3 | VSS YU IPROPNE CE ‘bu SICAL SURVEYS IN SEWARD

SURVEY = __ _ — ws flo. AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS IN SEWAR’
MAGNETICS BASED ON ARBITRARY DATUM cous ZZ CLA ous as PEN. 196 COVERAGE CONFINED T?

NOME AREA AREAS OUTLINED BY DASHED LINES PLUS
REGIONAL MAGNETIC GRADIENT NOT REMOVED +... 2 A LETTEPED PROFILES
\ ESTIMATED TOTAL INTENSITY OF FIELD: 55,000 GAMMAS Sa coe -
- ee 1g INOME BEACH AREA eae

MEAN INCLINATION: +75° arog 3.10.11 "3°30"

Me
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/ LEOF. WELLS, IIILeo F. Wells, IIIChief Executive OfficerMay 12, 2011





/s/ DOUGLASP. WILLIAMSDouglas P. WilliamsChief Financial OfficerMay 12, 2011