alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL00-71-000]

Take notice that on May 2, 2000, The City of Detroit, Michigan (Detroit) submitted a Complaint pursuant to Sections 206 and 306 of the Federal Power Act against the Detroit Edison Company (DECo). The Complaint alleges that DECo has improperly applied a penalty charge to certain power delivered by DECo to Detroit on July 27, 1999; that the parties' contract does not and should not provide for a penalty charge in the circumstances at issue.

Copies of the filing were served upon the Respondents and the Michigan Public Service Commission.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules and Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or protests must be filed on or before May 22, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222) for assistance. Answers                           ( print page 30099)                        to the compliant shall also be due on or before May 22, 2000.                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-11634  Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 92 (Thursday, May 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11851]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-960-1910-BJ-4377] ES-50669, Group 163, Wisconsin]


Notice of Filing of Plat Survey; Wisconsin

    The plat of the dependent resurvey of a portion of the east and 
north boundaries, and a portion of the subdivisional lines, Township 51 
North, Range 4 West, 4th Principal Meridian, Wisconsin, will be 
officially filed in Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia at 7:30 a.m., 
on June 12, 2000.
    The survey was requested by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
    All inquiries or protests concerning the technical aspects of the 
survey must be sent to the Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Eastern States, 
Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 
22153, prior to 7:30 a.m., June 12, 2000.
    Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and 
prepayment of the appropriate fee.

    Dated: April 27, 2000.
Stephen G. Kopach,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 00-11851 Filed 5-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
# EUR-Lex - 31995F1127(03) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995F1127(03)

**Council Act of 26 July 1995 drawing up the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests **

*
Official Journal C 316 , 27/11/1995 P. 0048 - 0048 *

COUNCIL ACT of 26 July 1995 drawing up the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests (95/C 316/03)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regarding to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article K.3 (2) (c) thereof,

Whereas, for the purposes of achieving the objectives of the Union, the Member States regard the combating of fraud affecting the European Communities' financial interests as a matter of common interest coming under the cooperating provided for in Title VI of the Treaty;

Whereas, in order to combat such fraud with the utmost vigour, it is necessary to draw up a first agreement, to be supplemented shortly afterwards by another legal instrument, in such a way as to improve the effectiveness of protection under criminal law of the European Communities' financial interests;

HAVING DECIDED that the Convention, the text of which is given in the Annex and which is signed today by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the Union, is hereby drawn up;

RECOMMENDS that it be adopted by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

Done at Brussels, 26 July 1995

For the Council

The President

J. A. BELLOCH JULBE
§ 450.5 Issuance of a vehicle operator license. ( a ) The FAA issues a vehicle operator license to an applicant who has obtained all approvals and determinations required under this part for a license.
( b ) A vehicle operator license authorizes a licensee to conduct launches or reentries, in accordance with the representations contained in the licensee's application, with subparts C and D of this part, and subject to the licensee's compliance with terms and conditions contained in license orders accompanying the license, including financial responsibility requirements.
§ 1206.8 Amendment or rescission of rules in this part. ( a ) The Board may at any time amend or rescind any rule or regulation in this part by following the public rulemaking procedures under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553) and after providing the opportunity for a public hearing.
( b ) The requirements of paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply to any rule or proposed rule to which the third sentence of section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act applies.
( c ) Any interested person may petition the Board, in writing, for the issuance, amendment, or repeal of a rule or regulation in this part. An original and three copies of such petition shall be filed with the Board in Washington, DC, and shall state the rule or regulation proposed to be issued, amended, or repealed, together with a statement of grounds in support of such petition.
[77 FR 75549, Dec. 21, 2012. Redesignated at 84 FR 35989, July 26, 2019]]
Exhibit
32.1
  Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Knot, Inc. (the “Company”)
for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Liu, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 
 (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  By:
              /s/
      David LiuDavid
      Liu
                Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
  Date:
March 12, 2010
#### § 102.101 Response to petition; service of response.

Any party served with such petition may, within 14 days after service thereof, respond to the petition, admitting or denying its allegations. The response must be filed with the Board in Washington, DC. The response must simultaneously be served on all other parties to the proceeding, and a statement of service must be filed in accordance with the provisions of § 102.5(h).

[82 FR 11767, Feb. 24, 2017]
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Edward J. Gramm, Deceased. James F. Egan, Public Administrator of New York County, as Administrator of the Estate of Edward J. Gramm, Deceased, et al., Appellants; Walter Benson, Respondent.

Argued January 7, 1937;

decided January 26, 1937.

*Sidney B. Alexander*amd *Meyer Loebelson*for John R. Gramm et al., appellants.

*Joseph T. Arenson*and *Joseph A. Cox*for James F. Egan, as Public Administrator, appellant.

*Abraham Lillienthal*and *Irving A. Heimlich*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs payable out of the estate; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: Lehman and Finch, JJ.
# EUR-Lex - 31996D0193 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996D0193

**96/193/EC: Commission Decision of 27 February 1996 amending Decision 94/198/EC laying down specific conditions for importing fishery and aquaculture products from Brazil (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 061 , 12/03/1996 P. 0043 - 0046 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 27 February 1996 amending Decision 94/198/EC laying down specific conditions for importing fishery and aquaculture products from Brazil (Text with EEA relevance) (96/193/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products (1), as last amended by Directive 95/71/EC (2), and in particular Article 11 (5) thereof,

Whereas the list of establishments approved by Brazil for importing fishery and aquaculture products into the Community has been drawn up in Commission Decision 94/198/EC (3); whereas this list may be amended following the communication of a new list by the competent authority in Brazil;

Whereas the competent authority in Brazil has communicated a new list of establishments;

Whereas it is necessary to amend the list of approved establishments accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision have been drawn up in accordance with the procedure laid down by Commission Decision 90/13/EEC (4),

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex B of Decision 94/198/EC is replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 February 1996.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.

(2) OJ No L 332, 30. 12. 1995, p. 40.

(3) OJ No L 93, 12. 4. 1994, p. 26.

(4) OJ No L 8, 11. 1. 1990, p. 70.

ANNEX

'ANNEX B

>TABLE>
Regulatory Evaluation Docket No. FAA-2010-0219 Directorate Identifier: 10-NE-14 Add the ·H··ork hours, parts cost, and number of US. registered products to the table belmr. When .vou are finished, click on the "Update Fields" button to automatically fill in the totals. Update Fields I I Costs: Action

Costs per Product (e.g., (e.g., Inspection,

Total Cost replacement)

Labor Parts Cost Do not include on- (include cost (l<ibor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet condition costs here

access, testing, **(®.~~!h** parts)

Registered and 5 ..

.

c . ' . •.

' ••

.

.

.. ·•

•.

. .

. ·.

.

• •

. The known number OI in Total Costs of •for r.s. fleet: $2,97: Costs

I (i **oCosts~** Action

Labor cost Parts Cost (e.g., Inspection,

(include access, (@$85/hour) testing, and close- replacement)
uol

8Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs tablethat wasassumed or might notbe obvious. This field canalso be used to explain warranty costs): Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered

a "significant regulatory**action"?~-** YES* 0 NO 0 *Explanation: DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant?**~,.**

YES* 0 NO 181 *Explanation: This AD is not considered tobe "significant" Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact onasubstantial number of small entities? Explain for either aYes orNo**answer.·~**
YESO N00 Explanation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate toinclude specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

• YES* 0 NO 0 *Explanation:

9
Take notice that on January 6, 2000, High Island Offshore System, L.L.C. (HIOS), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with an effective date of April 6, 1999:

First Revised Sheet No. 26

First Revised Sheet No. 201

HIOS states that such tariff sheets are being submitted to comply with the Office of Pipeline Regulation's December 14, 1999, Letter Order in this proceeding.

Any person desiring to protect this filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-1184 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 89 (Monday, May 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26651-26652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11340]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE


Notice With Respect to List of Countries Denying Fair Market 
Opportunities for Government-Funded Airport Construction Projects

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION: Notice with respect to a list of countries denying fair market 
opportunities for products and suppliers of the United States in 
airport construction procurements.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 533 of the Airport and Airway Improvement 
Act of 1982, as amended (49 U.S.C. 50104), the United States Trade 
Representative (``USTR'') has determined not to include

[[Page 26652]]

any countries on the list of countries that deny fair market 
opportunities for U.S. products, suppliers, or bidders in foreign 
government-funded airport construction projects.

DATES: Effective May 1, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Office of the United States Trade Representative, 600 17th 
Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20508.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Ellis, Director of Government 
Procurement Issues, (202) 395-3063; or Stephen Kho, Assistant General 
Counsel, (202) 395-3581.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 533 of the Airport and Airway 
Improvement Act of 1982, as amended by section 115 of the Airport and 
Airway Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1987, Pub. L. 100-223 
(codified at 49 U.S.C. 50104) (``the Act''), requires USTR to decide by 
May 1, 2000, whether any foreign countries have denied fair market 
opportunities to U.S. products, suppliers, or bidders in connection 
with airport construction projects of $500,000 or more that are funded 
in whole or in part by the governments of such countries. The list of 
such countries must be published in the Federal Register. For the 
purposes of the Act, USTR has decided not to include any countries on 
the list of countries that deny fair market opportunities for U.S. 
products, suppliers, or bidders in foreign government-funded airport 
construction projects.

Charlene Barshefsky,
United States Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. 00-11340 Filed 5-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
§ 252.5 Smoking ban: foreign air carriers. ( a ) ( 1 ) Foreign air carriers shall prohibit smoking on flight segments that occur between points in the United States, and between the United States and any foreign point, in the following types of operations: ( i ) Scheduled passenger foreign air transportation.
( ii ) Nonscheduled passenger foreign air transportation, if a flight attendant is a required crewmember on the aircraft as determined by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration or a foreign carrier's government.
( 2 ) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to require foreign air carriers to permit smoking aboard aircraft.
( b ) A foreign government objecting to the application of paragraph (a) of this section on the basis that paragraph (a) provides for extraterritorial application of the laws of the United States may request and obtain a waiver of paragraph (a) from the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs, provided that an alternative smoking prohibition resulting from bilateral negotiations is in effect.
[Docket DOT-OST-2011-0044, 81 FR 11427, Mar. 4, 2016]
§ 460.9 Informing crew of risk. An operator must inform in writing any individual serving as crew that the United States Government has not certified the launch vehicle and any reentry vehicle as safe for carrying flight crew or space flight participants. An operator must provide this information— ( a ) Before entering into any contract or other arrangement to employ that individual; or
( b ) For any crew member employed as of December 23, 2004, as early as possible and prior to any launch in which that individual will participate as crew.
#### SAFFORD, Supt. of Ins. v. MET. LIFE INS. CO.

Ohio Supreme Court.

No. 21398.

Decided Dec. 12, 1928.

MATTHIAS, J.

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.

(140S). A statute which creates a new obligation in respect to transactions or considerations already past is violative of Article H, Section 28 of the state constiution, which forbids the enactment of retroactive laws by the general assembly.

TAXES.

(560F2) To so interpret and apply Section 5433, General Code, as amended May 11, 1927 (112 O. L., 429), increasing the tax upon business done by foreign insurance companies in this state from 2% to 3%, as to exact such additional tax for the privilege of doing business in 1926, would render such provision retroactive in effect.

Marshall, C. J., Day, Allen, Kinkade, Robinson and Jones, JJ., concur.
§ 11.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*) directs that, “to the fullest extent possible, * * * the policies, regulations and public laws of the United States shall be interpreted and administered in accordance with the policies set forth” in the Act for the preservation of the environment. As a means for achieving this objective, Executive Order 11991 of May 24, 1977 (amending E.O. 11514 of March 5, 1970) directed the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) to issue uniform regulations for implementation of NEPA by all Federal agencies. These regulations were published in final form on November 29, 1978 (43 FR 55978) as 40 CFR parts 1500-1508. The CEQ's NEPA regulations require that each Federal agency adopt implementing procedures to supplement their regulations (40 CFR 1507.3). Accordingly, the purpose of this part is to prescribe procedures to be followed by Department of Labor agencies when such agencies are contemplating actions which may be subject to the requirements of NEPA. These regulations do not replace 40 CFR parts 1500-1508; rather they are to be read together with, and as a supplement to, the CEQ's regulations.
( b ) It is the responsibility of each agency to comply with the policies set forth in NEPA to the fullest extent possible and consistent with its statutory authority. Each agency shall comply with all applicable requirements of this part except where compliance would be inconsistent with other statutory requirements. However, no trivial violation of, or noncompliance with, these procedures shall give rise to an independent cause of action (cf. 40 CFR 1500.3 and 1507.3(b)).
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


         Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report of Columbus McKinnon  Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31,  2005,  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  and  that
information contained in the such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated:  June 8, 2005
        -------------


                                                      /S/ TIMOTHY T. TEVENS
                                                      -----------------------
                                                      Timothy T. Tevens
                                                      Chief Executive Officer


                                                      /S/ ROBERT R. FRIEDL
                                                      ----------------------
                                                      Robert R. Friedl
                                                      Chief Financial Officer

























                                       42
SERVED MARCH 7, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH D. BARBERA FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED]

.(Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013-1083
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013NM090056) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List
.

Attachment

- Service List

## ~ 

# '\ -=-··-·· ..·. ..**·~····--·-·--···**

# '--ft6~**~** ChiefAdministrative Law Judge/'" 

# / 

# v/SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1


### Joseph D. Barbera, Respondent 

### 14706 N.E. Erickson Dr. La Center, W A 98629-4405 TEL:, NOT PROVIDED FAX: NOT PROVIDED David F. Shayne, Complainant's Counsel 

### Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Ave., S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1847 FAX: 425-227-1007 ONE COPY



### The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-1083 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal · Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-