alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1 Certification
--------------------------

Certification  of  Chief  Executive Officer of First Capital International, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of 18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S.C.  63.
----------

I,  Alex Genin, the Chief Executive Officer of First Capital International, Inc.
hereby  certify  that  First  Capital  International, Inc.'s quarterly report on
Form 10QSB  and  the  financial  statements  contained  therein,  fully complies
with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934  (15  U.S.C.  78m  or 78o(d))  and that information contained in the
quarterly  report  on  Form  10  QSB  and  the  financial  statements  contained
therein fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results  of  the  operations  of  First  Capital  International,  Inc.


Date:   May 13, 2003                              /s/    Alex Genin
                                               Chief  Executive  Officer  of
                                               First Capital International, Inc.


Certification  of  Chief  Financial Officer of First Capital International, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 1350 of 18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S.C.  63.
----------

I,  Alex  Genin,  the  Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  First  Capital
International,  Inc.  hereby  certify  that  First Capital International, Inc.'s
Quarterly  report  on  Form  10  QSB  and  the  financial  statements  contained
therein, fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934 (15  U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that
information  contained  in  the  quarterly  report  on  Form  10  QSB  and  the
financial  statements  contained  therein  fairly  represents,  in  all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  the operations of  First
Capital  International,  Inc.


Date:   May 13, 2003                            /s/    Alex  Genin
                                               Acting Chief Financial Officer of
                                               First Capital International, Inc.


<PAGE>
§ 417.402 Compliance. ( a ) *General.* A launch operator's ground safety process must satisfy this subpart.
( b ) *Ground safety analysis conducted for launch at a Federal launch range.* This provision applies to all sections of this subpart. The FAA will accept a ground safety process conducted for a launch from a Federal launch range without need for further demonstration of compliance to the FAA if: ( 1 ) A launch operator has contracted with a Federal launch range for the provision of the ground safety process; and
( 2 ) The FAA has assessed the Federal launch range, through its launch site safety assessment, and found that the Federal launch range's ground safety process satisfies the requirements of this subpart. In this case, the FAA will treat the Federal launch range's process as that of a launch operator.
( c ) *Toxic release hazard analysis conducted for launch processing at a Federal launch range.* The FAA will accept a toxic release hazard analysis conducted for launch processing from a Federal launch range provided the toxic release analysis satisfies the Federal launch range's requirements, and the FAA has assessed the Federal launch range, through its launch site safety assessment, and found that the applicable Federal launch range safety-related launch services and property satisfy the requirements of this subpart.
( d ) *Demonstration of compliance.* For a licensed launch that does not satisfy paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, a launch operator must demonstrate compliance to the FAA with the requirements of this subpart, and must include in its demonstration the analysis products required by subparts A and E of this part, and appendices I and J of this part.
( e ) *Alternate methods.* The FAA will approve an alternate hazard control method if a launch operator demonstrates, in accordance with § 406.3(b), that its proposed hazard control method provides an equivalent level of safety to that required by this subpart.
#### Matilda Brand et al., Appellants, *v.*Interborough Rapid Transit Company, Respondent.

Argued March 15, 1937;

decided April 20, 1937.

*659
      *Frederick S. Martyn*and *Raymond D. Thurber*for appellants.

*A. H. Cole, Louis S. Carpenter*and *James L. Quackenbush*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999             JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999             APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                          23,464                  23,464
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  141,978                 141,978
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               243,972                 243,972
<PP&E>                                          23,082                  23,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,368                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 272,282                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          423,648                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     1,340,950                 754,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,492,316)               (846,427)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   272,282                 159,369
<SALES>                                        526,700                 267,953
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               526,700                 267,953
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,253,587                 483,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (726,887)               (215,605)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (80,998)                (78,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (645,989)               (137,105)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)                   (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)                   (.01)


</TABLE>
#### § 101.37 Application for temporary relief or restraining orders.

Whenever it is deemed advisable to seek temporary injunctive relief under section 10(j) or whenever it is determined that a complaint should issue alleging violation of section 8(b)(4) (A), (B), or (C), or section 8(e), or section 8(b)(7), or whenever it is appropriate to seek temporary injunctive relief for a violation of section 8(b)(4)(D), the officer or regional attorney to whom the matter has been referred will make application for appropriate temporary relief or restraining order in the district court of the United States within which the unfair labor practice is alleged to have occurred or within which the party sought to be enjoined resides or transacts business, except that such officer or regional attorney will not apply for injunctive relief under section 10(l) with respect to an alleged violation of section 8(b)(7) if a charge under section 8(a)(2) has been filed and, after preliminary investigation, there is reasonable cause to believe that such charge is true and a complaint should issue.
#### § 91.305 Flight test areas.

No person may flight test an aircraft except over open water, or sparsely populated areas, having light air traffic.
§ 431.31 General. ( a ) The FAA conducts a safety review to determine whether an applicant is capable of launching an RLV and payload, if any, from a designated launch site, and reentering the RLV and payload, if any, to a designated reentry site or location, or otherwise landing it on Earth, without jeopardizing public health and safety and the safety of property.
( b ) The FAA issues a safety approval to an RLV mission license applicant that satisfies the requirements of this Subpart. The FAA evaluates on an individual basis all public safety aspects of a proposed RLV mission to ensure they are sufficient to support safe conduct of the mission. A safety approval is part of the licensing record on which the FAA's licensing determination is based.
( c ) The FAA advises an applicant, in writing, of any issue raised during a safety review that would impede issuance of a safety approval. The applicant may respond, in writing, or revise its license application.
----

|                   | /s/ TERRY G. ROUSSEL                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:      May 9, 2008 | Terry      G. RousselChief      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) ofCornerstone      Ventures, Inc., Managing Member ofCornerstone      Industrial Properties, LLC, the Managing Member ofCornerstone      Realty Fund, LLC |
|                   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                   | /s/ SHARON C. KAISER                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| Date:      May 9, 2008 | Sharon      C. KaiserChief      Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) ofCornerstone      Ventures, Inc., Managing Member ofCornerstone      Industrial Properties, LLC, the Managing Member ofCornerstone      Realty Fund, LLC |

----
§ 91.1083 Crewmember emergency training. ( a ) Each training program must provide emergency training under this section for each aircraft type, model, and configuration, each crewmember, and each kind of operation conducted, as appropriate for each crewmember and the program manager.
( b ) Emergency training must provide the following: ( 1 ) Instruction in emergency assignments and procedures, including coordination among crewmembers.
( 2 ) Individual instruction in the location, function, and operation of emergency equipment including— ( i ) Equipment used in ditching and evacuation;
( ii ) First aid equipment and its proper use; and
( iii ) Portable fire extinguishers, with emphasis on the type of extinguisher to be used on different classes of fires.
( 3 ) Instruction in the handling of emergency situations including— ( i ) Rapid decompression;
( ii ) Fire in flight or on the surface and smoke control procedures with emphasis on electrical equipment and related circuit breakers found in cabin areas;
( iii ) Ditching and evacuation;
( iv ) Illness, injury, or other abnormal situations involving passengers or crewmembers; and
( v ) Hijacking and other unusual situations.
( 4 ) Review and discussion of previous aircraft accidents and incidents involving actual emergency situations.
( c ) Each crewmember must perform at least the following emergency drills, using the proper emergency equipment and procedures, unless the Administrator finds that, for a particular drill, the crewmember can be adequately trained by demonstration: ( 1 ) Ditching, if applicable.
( 2 ) Emergency evacuation.
( 3 ) Fire extinguishing and smoke control.
( 4 ) Operation and use of emergency exits, including deployment and use of evacuation slides, if applicable.
( 5 ) Use of crew and passenger oxygen.
( 6 ) Removal of life rafts from the aircraft, inflation of the life rafts, use of lifelines, and boarding of passengers and crew, if applicable.
( 7 ) Donning and inflation of life vests and the use of other individual flotation devices, if applicable.
( d ) Crewmembers who serve in operations above 25,000 feet must receive instruction in the following: ( 1 ) Respiration.
( 2 ) Hypoxia.
( 3 ) Duration of consciousness without supplemental oxygen at altitude.
( 4 ) Gas expansion.
( 5 ) Gas bubble formation.
( 6 ) Physical phenomena and incidents of decompression.
EXHIBIT 32

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

<PAGE>

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350),
the  undersigned,  David J Cutler,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Multi-Link  Telecommunications,  Inc., (the  "Company"),  does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

     The Quarterly Report Form 10QSB for the nine months ended December 31, 2004
of the Company (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1034,  and the  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:       February 15, 2005

By /s/ David J Cutler
   ----------------------
David J Cutler
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00418-CR

JASON NEAL MCBURNETT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 297th District Court

of Tarrant County (1505402D)

May 6, 2021

Opinion by Justice Walker

(p)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment 

of the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Brian Walker

 Justice Brian Walker
SERVED MAY 4, 2010 ,...„,,.....,..,„...,.,, 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC ' i 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SCENIC AVIATION, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09NM0011 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2009-0974 

HEARING NOTICE 

The Procedural Order be and is hereby amended as follows, reflecting a change in 

discovery: 

On or before July 1, 2010, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, but 

not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production requests 

and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute they shall 

submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner; 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

on July 13,14,15, and 16,2010, at the U.S. Tax Court, Courtroom 5223, Wallace F. 

Bennett Federal Building, 125 S. State Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84138. Hearings 

will commence at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30 p.m. each day. The parties should 

vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00 p.m. each day. 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment(s) - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP09NM011 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Counsel 

Aviation Law Experts, LLC 

330 Aviation Way, Second Floor 

Frederick, MD 21701 

TEL: 301-294-8550 

FAX: 301-294-2525 

Scott R. Morris, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2007 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building -

Room 2014, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### WAHL et v. TRAPAS.

Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist., Summit Co.

No. 1518.

Decided Dec. 7, 1928.

Falkner, Dotson & Haynes, Akron, for Wahl.

Samuel Friedman, Akron, for Trapas.

*22WASHBURN, P. J.

It is evident from the contract that the trial court considered that language in in said contract, which was signed by the defendants, to be a memorandum in writing as required by statute. In so holding, the trial court was clearly in error.

> ‘T. The memorandum in writing which is required by the statute of frauds Section 4199, Revised Statutes), is a memorandum of the agreement between parties; and it is not sufficient unless it contains the essential terms of the agreement expressed with such clearness and certainty that they may be understood from the memorandum itself or some other writing to which it refers, without the necessity of resorting to parol proof.”

> Kling, Admr., v. Bordner, 65 O. S. 86.

This rule is well established, and there can be no question but that, in the case at bar, there was no memorandum in writing, signed by the defendants, which complied with the requirements of said section, and for that reason the item of $50 for commission on the sale of real estate, was erroneously included in the judgment of $55 which was rendered in this case.

As to the $5 item, the record discloses that there was proper proof that the defendants were liable to the plaintiff for said item, and there was no proof that the same had been paid, and therefore the plaintiff was entitled to a judgment against the defendants for $5 and no more.

The judgment that was rendered is therefore modified, by reducing the same from $55 to $5, and as so modified, is affirmed.

Funk, J., and Pardee, J., concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136161 & (26) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136161 

 COA: 279601 
 Wayne CC: 04-002336

ERICK LAMONT REED,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 20, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to remand is DENIED. 

s0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
§ 27.521 Float landing conditions. If certification for float operation is requested, the rotorcraft, with floats, must be designed to withstand the following loading conditions (where the limit load factor is determined under § 27.473(b) or assumed to be equal to that determined for wheel landing gear): ( a ) Up-load conditions in which— ( 1 ) A load is applied so that, with the rotorcraft in the static level attitude, the resultant water reaction passes vertically through the center of gravity; and
( 2 ) The vertical load prescribed in paragraph (a)(1) of this section is applied simultaneously with an aft component of 0.25 times the vertical component.
( b ) A side-load condition in which— ( 1 ) A vertical load of 0.75 times the total vertical load specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section is divided equally among the floats; and
( 2 ) For each float, the load share determined under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, combined with a total side load of 0.25 times the total vertical load specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, is applied to that float only.
#### § 71.51 Class C airspace.

The Class C airspace areas listed in subpart C of FAA Order JO 7400.11J (incorporated by reference, see § 71.1) consist of specified airspace within which all aircraft operators are subject to operating rules and equipment requirements specified in part 91 of this chapter. Each Class C airspace area designated for an airport in subpart C of FAA Order JO 7400.11J. (incorporated by reference, see § 71.1) contains at least one primary airport around which the airspace is designated.

[Doc. No. 29334, 73 FR 54495, Sept. 22, 2008, as amended by Amdt. 71-40, 73 FR 60940, Oct. 15, 2008; Amdt. 71-41, 74 FR 46490, Sept. 10, 2009; Amdt. 71-42, 75 FR 55269, Sept. 10, 2010; Amdt. 71-43, 76 FR 53329, Aug. 26, 2011; Amdt. 71-44, 77 FR 50908, Aug. 23, 2012; Amdt. 71-45, 78 FR 52848, Aug. 27, 2013; Amdt. 71-46, 79 FR 51888, Sept. 2, 2014; Amdt. 71-47, 80 FR 51937, Aug. 27, 2015; Amdt. 71-48, 81 FR 55372, Aug. 19, 2016; Amdt. 71-49, 82 FR 40068, Aug. 24, 2017; Amdt. 71-50, 83 FR 43757, Aug. 28, 2018; Amdt. 71-51, 84 FR 45652, Aug. 30, 2019; Amdt. 71-52, 85 FR 50780, Aug. 18, 2020; Amdt. No. 71-53, 86 FR 46963, Aug. 23, 2021; Docket No. FAA-2022-1022, Amdt. No. 71-54, 87 FR 54878, Sept. 8, 2022; Docket No. FAA-2023-1785; Amendment No. 71-55, 88 FR 58072, Aug. 25, 2023; Docket No. FAA-2024-2061; Amendment No. 71-56, 89 FR 68339, Aug. 26, 2024]

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

By Docket No. FAA-2024-2061; Amendment No. 71-56, 89 FR 68339, Aug. 26, 2024, § 71.51 was amended by removing the words “FAA Order JO 7400.11H” everywhere that they appear and adding, in their place, the words “FAA Order JO 7400.11J, effective Sept. 15, 2024 through Sept. 15, 2025.