alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
David W. Montgomery, certify that:

(1)   I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Advanstar Communications Inc. (the "registrant");

(2)   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)   The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



(5)   The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



|Date: March 29, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/DAVID W. MONTGOMERYDavid W. Montgomery
Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
§ 300.5 Prohibited conduct. No person shall: (a) Attempt to influence the judgment of a concerned DOT employee by any unlawful means such as deception or the payment of money or other consideration; or ( b ) Disrupt or interfere with the fair and orderly disposition of a DOT proceeding.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129728 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129728 COA: 255632 Kent CC: 03-003846-FC LEON LAVIL WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e September 20, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0123 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 30, 2006

Clerk
Served: February 7, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

------------------------------------------------------------

CHAUTAUQUA AIRLINES, INC.

LYNX AVIATION, INC.

and

REPUBLIC AIRLINES, INC.

------------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On February 2, 2011, Chautauqua Airlines, Inc. (“Chautauqua”), Lynx Aviation, Inc. (“Lynx”), 

and Republic Airlines, Inc. (“Republic”), all U.S. certificated air carriers,

1 requested that the 

Department register the trade name “Frontier Express” for use in certain of its air transportation 

operations.

Part 215 of the Department’s regulations provides that any air carrier wishing to use an 

alternative trade name must first register that name with the Department. The rule further states 

that the Department may register such name after the air carrier gives notification to similarly

named air carriers of the proposed use of the name. Chautauqua, Lynx, and Republic states that 

it recently entered into a code share agreement with Frontier Airlines, Inc. (“Frontier”), under 

which it will conduct certain operations using the Frontier Express trade name on behalf of 

Frontier. Further, the airlines states that Frontier is aware of and concurs with its request to 

register the trade name. Moreover, other than Frontier’s code-share partners previously

authorized to use the trade name “Frontier Airlines” we identified no other air carriers using a 

similar name. 

 

1 Chautauqua, Lynx, and Republic’s certificates were last reissued by Order 2004-11-1, Order 2007-5-13, and 

Order 2007-11-27, respectively. 
2

Since Chautauqua, Lynx, and Republic have complied with the requirements of Part 215, we 

acknowledge the registration of the trade name “Frontier Express” by Chautauqua, Lynx, and 

Republic for immediate use in its operations.

Dated at Washington, D.C., .

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov.
Attachment A

SERVICE LIST FOR CHAUTAUQUA AIRLINES, INC., LYNX 

AVIATION, INC., AND REPUBLIC AIRLINES, INC.

MR PATRICK RIZZI

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

COLUBIA SQUARE

555 13TH STREET NW

WASHINGTON DC 20004

MR WILLIAM J WEBER

CERTIFICATION SECTION MANAGER

FAA AFS-900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

MS LINDA BAKER

POI FOR CHAUTAUQUA AIRLINES INC

FAA INDIANAPOLIS FSDO

1201 COLUMBIA ROAD

PLAINFIELD IN 46168

MR PETER LYNCH AGC-300

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR ENFORCEMENT

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591

MR DAVID ENLOW

POI FOR REPUBLIC AIRLINES INC

FAA INDIANAPOLIS FSDO

1201 COLUMBIA ROAD

PLAINFIELD IN 46168

MR BERNARD STANKUS 

OFFICE OF AIRLINE 

 INFORMATION

DOT/RITA/BTS RTS-42

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

MR HAROLD WAYMAN

POI FOR LYNX AVIATION INC

FAA DENVER ACO

26805 EAST 68 TH AVENUE

DENVER CO 80249

MS ANNE SUISSA RTS-42

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RITA/BTS E-34

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590
#### § 61.201 [Reserved]
#### §§ 34.61-34.71 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. CP00-48-000]

                    On May 16 and 17, 2000 the Office of Energy Projects (OEP) staff will inspect Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company's (TGP) proposed route and potential alternative routes for the Londonderry 20” Replacement Project in Middlesex County, Massachusetts, and Hillsboro and Rockingham Counties, New Hampshire. The areas will be inspected by automobile and on foot. Representatives of TGP will accompany the OEP staff. Anyone interested in                           ( print page 30398)                        participating in the site visits must provide their own transportation.                

For additional information, contact Mr. Paul McKee of the Commission's Office of External Affairs at (202) 208-1088.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-11772  Filed 5-10-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1 

{ CONFIDENTIAL

This document contains overall production process description 

and distillation parameters. This is main commercial product used as 

The process generates several waste streams. 

 

 

The is produced at points I, II, and III. All three -containing streams flow to a storage 

vessel.
2 

Overall Reaction process – 

• The preparation of 

consists of two principle reactions.

• The first reaction is the 

•
3 

•

 
4 

Cyclization:
5 
6 

Recovery:
7 

 Production:

9 
10

}
[No. 28395-6-II.

Division Two.

December 6, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Orson L. Drath, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Mason County, No. 01-1-00246-5, Toni A. Sheldon, J., entered February 1, 2002. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Hunt, C.J., and Seinfeld, J.
#### § 27.1393 Minimum intensities in any vertical plane of forward and rear position lights.

Each position light intensity must equal or exceed the applicable values in the following table:

| Angle above or below the horizontal plane | Intensity, *l* |
| --- | --- |
| 0° | 1.00 |
| 0° to 5° | 0.90 |
| 5° to 10° | 0.80 |
| 10° to 15° | 0.70 |
| 15° to 20° | 0.50 |
| 20° to 30° | 0.30 |
| 30° to 40° | 0.10 |
| 40° to 90° | 0.05 |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          48,224
<SECURITIES>                                    90,862
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,216
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,838
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               180,746
<PP&E>                                          15,089
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,669
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 198,313
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,172
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           581
<OTHER-SE>                                     153,043
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   198,313
<SALES>                                         99,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,200
<CGS>                                           80,555
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,690
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,353
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,005)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,838)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,838)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,838)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.43)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR SECOND QUARTER 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ALTREX INCORPORATED.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                    APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       0
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                            2,500,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                0
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                0
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.00




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Link Plus Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jonathan P. Gluckman,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


   /s/ JONATHAN P. GLUCKMAN
-------------------------------------
Jonathan P. Gluckman, President/COO/Director
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.220 Final decision of the Department. In addition to the provisions of § 302.38, the following provisions shall apply: ( a ) In the case of a certificate application that has been set for oral evidentiary hearing under § 302.210(a)(4), the Department will issue its final order within ninety (90) days after the initial or recommended decision is issued. If an application has failed to meet the procedural schedule established by the Department, the DOT decisionmaker may, by notice, extend the date for a final decision for a period equal to the period of delay caused by the applicant.
( b ) If the DOT decisionmaker does not act in the time period established in paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) in the case of an application for a certificate to engage in foreign air transportation, the recommended decision shall be transmitted to the President of the United States under 49 U.S.C. 41307; or
( 2 ) in the case of an application not subject to review by the President of the United States, the initial decision shall become effective as the final order of the Department.
( c ) In the case of a certificate application that has been processed under § 302.210(a)(1) or (5), the Department will issue its final order within one hundred eighty (180) days after the order establishing further procedures. If an applicant has failed to meet the procedural schedule established by the Department, the DOT decisionmaker may, by notice, extend the due date for a final decision for a period equal to the period of delay caused by the applicant.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Noxious weed treatment project: final environmental impact statement, Modoc National Forest**
 
Volume One
VolumeTwo: Part One | Part Two
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.105/2:R 5-MB-167
Item Number:0082-A-05 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000930264
 
January 17, 2018
#### § 61.61 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes the requirements for the issuance of additional aircraft ratings after a pilot certificate is issued, issuance of a type rating concurrently with a pilot certificate, and the requirements for and limitations of pilot authorizations issued by the Administrator.

[Doc. No. FAA-2006-26661, 76 FR 78143, Dec. 16, 2011]
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries of the Company

24/7
Real Media, Inc.
May Acquisition, LLC
Blue-Green Holding, Inc.
Real Media, Inc.
24/7 Real Media Europe Holding S.A.
24/7 Real Media France SARL
24/7 Real Media Germany
Real Media Spain
Real Media Scandinavia
24/7 Real Media Technology S.A.
24/7 Real Media UK
24/7 Real Media Asia
24/7 Search, Inc.
24/7 Media Canada Holding Company
24/7 Canada, Inc.
Decide Holdings Pty Limited
Decide Interactive Pty Limited
Babela Pty Limited
Decide Interactive UK Limited
Adult Search Solutions Pty Limited
Adult Search Solutions Limited

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 6.56

                            iQ Power Technology Inc.
                                   Suite 708-A
                            1111 West Hasting Street
                                 Vancouver, B.C.
                                     V6E 2J3



          Re:  Amendment of terms of non-revolving term credit facility In favor
               of iQ Power Technology Inc. as reflected in the December 13, 2000
               Letter  Among iQ Power  Technology Inc.,iQ  Battery  Research and
               Development GmbH, and John Lawson (the "Commitment Letter")

This will serve to  confirm  the  agreed  amendment  to the  December  13,  2000
Commitment  Letter  to  provide  that  the  final  date  for  repayment  of  all
outstanding  amounts of principal and interest thereunder shall be extended from
June 30, 2001 to December 31, 2001.

This Amendment may be signed,  manually or by facsimile, in counterpart and each
such  counterpart   together  shall  constitute  a  true  original  and  provide
satisfactory evidence that this amendment has been duly agreed to by the parties
hereto.

If the  foregoing  accurately  summarizes  our  understanding,  would you kindly
indicate  the same by  countersigning  this  letter  in the space  provided  and
returning the same as soon as possible.

Dated effective June 30, 2001.



iQ Power Technology Inc.

Per: /s/ Peter E. Braun
    --------------------

Per:____________________

Accepted effective June 30, 2001.

iQ Battery Research and Development GmbH

Per: /s/ Peter E. Braun
    --------------------

Per:____________________

Accepted effective June 30, 2001.


/s/ John Lawson
#### § 93.253 Nonstop operations.

No person may operate an aircraft nonstop in air transportation between Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport and another airport that is more than 1,250 miles away from Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

VELESA DRAUGHN,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,

Respondent

______________________

2024-1430

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. DC-0752-17-0527-I-1.

______________________

Before CHEN, LINN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

Following this court’s February 22, 2024 show cause 

order, Velesa Draughn urges this court not to dismiss or 

transfer this matter, while the Department of the Army 

urges transfer. 

The Merit Systems Protection Board affirmed the 

Army’s removal of Ms. Draughn, rejecting her affirmative 

defenses that the removal was based on disability discrimination and retaliation for protected Equal Employment 

Opportunity (“EEO”) activity. Ms. Draughn seeks judicial 

Case: 24-1430 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 04/12/2024
2 DRAUGHN v. ARMY

review of the MSPB’s decision and her affirmative defenses. 

“Because [Ms. Draughn] complained of a personnel action serious enough to appeal to the MSPB”—here, her removal—“and alleged that the personnel action was based 

on,” among other things, “discrimination, [s]he brought a 

mixed case.” Perry v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 582 U.S. 420, 

432 (2017) (cleaned up); see 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2). “Judicial 

review of such a case lies in district court.” Perry, 582 U.S. 

at 432. Under the circumstances, we agree that transfer to 

the United States District Court for the District of Maryland (where the employment action appears to have occurred) is appropriate. See 28 U.S.C. § 1631. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

This matter and all case filings are transferred to the 

United States District Court for the District of Maryland 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. 

April 12, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

 

Case: 24-1430 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 04/12/2024