alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Charles H. Wells, Deceased. Catherine Y. Hallowell, Appellant; Mary E. Terry et al., Respondents.

(Argued November 19, 1936;

decided December 4, 1936.)

*John R. Vunk, Nathan O. Petty*and *George H. Carleton*for appellant.

*Barent L. Visscher, E. J. Dimock, Ruth A. Gladde*and *Glen W. Watkins*for Mary E. Terry et al., respondents.

*Fullerton Wells,*as special guardian for Robert Y. Edwards, respondent.

*Syrena H. Stackpole*for Suffolk County National Bank et al., as administrators of the estate of Charles H. Wells, deceased, respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs to all parties, payable out of the estate; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
# EUR-Lex - 31996D0466 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996D0466

**96/466/EC: Commission Decision of 15 July 1996 amending Decision 86/473/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Uruguay approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 192 , 02/08/1996 P. 0024 - 0025 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 15 July 1996 amending Decision 86/473/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Uruguay approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community (Text with EEA relevance) (96/466/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine, ovine and caprine animals and swine, fresh meat or meat products from third countries (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1601/92 (2), and in particular Article 4 (1) thereof,

Whereas a list of establishments in Uruguay, approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community, was drawn up initially by Commission Decision 86/473/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 94/464/EC (4);

Whereas a Community on-the-spot visit to meat product establishments in Uruguay has revealed that the level of hygiene in two establishments has improved since the last inspection; whereas the list of establishments should be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 86/473/EEC is hereby replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 July 1996.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28.

(2) OJ No L 173, 27. 6. 1992, p. 13.

(3) OJ No L 279, 30. 9. 1986, p. 53.

(4) OJ No L 190, 26. 7. 1994, p. 23.

ANNEX

LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS

>TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

** **

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

** **

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

** **

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of NEON Systems, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark J. Cresswell, Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted pursuant to(S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| August 16,  2004                                                     |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                 |
| /s/ Mark J.  Cresswell                                               |   |
| Mark J.  Cresswell                                                   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) |
|                                                                 |
|                                                                 |   |
|                                                                      |  |  |

 

1

----
**EXHIBIT 99**

 

RepresentationObtained From Arthur Andersen LLP

 

March 31, 2002

 

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

 

Arthur Andersen LLP has represented toDigital River, Inc. and Subsidiaries that its audit was subject to Andersen’squality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to providereasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance withprofessional standards and that there was appropriate continuity of Andersenpersonnel working on the audit and availability of national officeconsultation. Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of ArthurAndersen is not relevant to this audit.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

 
| Joel A. Ronning         |
|-------------------------|
| Chief Executive Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11714]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Applicant

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for licenses as 
Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 515).
    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
DC 20573.

Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary Applicants

Universal Consolidated Services, Inc., 145-32 157th Street, Suite 228, 
Jamaica, NY 11434; Officer: Nicholas Kim, Vice President (Qualifying 
Individual),
Peninsula Cargo, Inc., 11124 Narbel Avenue, Downey, CA 90241; Officers: 
Modesto M. Pascual, Vice President (Qualifying Individual), Roman 
Silvestre, President

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder 
Transportation Intermediary Applicants

Global Freight International, Inc. d/b/a, Interfreight Corporation, 
P.O. Box 6432, 100 Everett Avenue, Chelsea, MA 02150; Officers: Bernard 
A. Wilcken, President (Qualifying Individual), Ian C. Wilcken, 
Secretary

    Dated: May 5, 2000.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11714 Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
# EUR-Lex - 31995R1963 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995R1963

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1963/95 of 9 August 1995 amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 laying down detailed rules for the application of tariff quotas for imports of maize and sorghum into Spain and imports of maize into Portugal **

*
Official Journal L 189 , 10/08/1995 P. 0022 - 0022 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1963/95 of 9 August 1995 amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 laying down detailed rules for the application of tariff quotas for imports of maize and sorghum into Spain and imports of maize into Portugal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organization of the market in cereals (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1863/95 (2), and in particular Article 12 (1) thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 of 26 July 1995 laying down detailed rules for the application of tariff quotas for imports of maize and sorghum into Spain and imports of maize into Portugal (3) contains the rules governing the administration of those imports; whereas, however, there is nothing in that Regulation which provides for the adjustment of the reduction in the import duty granted under a tendering procedure according to the month of the import; whereas, in the case of maize and sorghum, the intervention price is adjusted between November and May to take account of monthly increases, and on 1 October to take account of the new harvest; whereas, to avoid disruptions on the market, Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 should be amended so as to introduce adjustments to the reduction corresponding to adjustments to the intervention price;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1839/95, the following is hereby added to the end of paragraph 4:

'However, in the case of imports effected after the end of the month in which the import licence is issued, if the month in which the licence is issued is between October and May inclusive the amount of the reduction granted shall be increased by an amount equal to the difference between the intervention price in force in the month in which the licence was issued plus 55 % and the price in force in the month in which the certificate of release for free circulation is accepted plus the same percentage. In the case of licences issued prior to 1 October and used from that date, the amount of the reduction granted shall be reduced by an amount calculated in the same way.`

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 August 1995.

For the Commission Martin BANGEMANN Member of the Commission
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. KEITH SMITH, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 297 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 7th day of October, 2014, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is DENIED
.
§ 435.3 Types of reentry licenses. ( a ) *Reentry-specific license.* A reentry-specific license authorizes a licensee to reenter one model or type of reentry vehicle, other than an RLV, to a reentry site or other location approved for the reentry. A reentry-specific license may authorize more than one reentry and identifies each reentry authorized under the license. A licensee's authorization to reenter terminates upon completion of all activities authorized by the license or the expiration date stated in the reentry license, whichever occurs first.
( b ) *Reentry-operator license.* A reentry operator license authorizes a licensee to reenter any of a designated family of reentry vehicles, other than an RLV, within authorized parameters, including trajectories, transporting specified classes of payloads to any reentry site designated in the license. A reentry operator license is valid for a 2-year renewable term.
( c ) *Duration of license.* Notwithstanding the duration for a license established in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, no license issued under this part will be valid after March 10, 2026.
[Docket No. FAA-1999-5535, 65 FR 56665, Sept. 19, 2000, as amended by Doc. No. FAA-2019-0229, Amdt. 435-5, 85 FR 79718, Dec. 10, 2020]
#### § 89.201 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes procedural requirements to establish an FAA-recognized identification area.
#### Oswego River Realty Corporation et al., Appellants and Respondents, Impleaded with Another, *v.*Sweet Brothers Paper Manufacturing Company, Inc., Respondent and Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

(Argued April 23, 1936;

decided October 6, 1936.)

*506
      *Charles E. Spencer, Basil B. Aylesworth*and *William A. Mackenzie*for Senoso Paper Company, Inc., plaintiff, appellant and respondent.

*507
      *Edward Schoeneck*for Oswego River Realty Corporation, plaintiff, appellant and respondent.

*Arthur E. Sutherland*for Sweet Brothers Paper Manufacturing Company, Inc., defendant, respondent and appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be modified to eliminate any adjudication as between the plaintiffs of riparian ownership or water rights in the pool above the dam, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Crane, Ch. J., O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran and Finch, JJ., concur; Lehman and Crouch, JJ., dissent from so much of the decision as holds that the water power of the Peck Mill opening is confined to the amount of water necessary to operate a two-saw mill.

Judgment accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF AUGUST 29, 1998 AND THE STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE FIFTY-TWO WEEKS
ENDED AUGUST 29, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-21-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-21-1998
<CASH>                                           6,868
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,002
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,772
<PP&E>                                          98,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,839
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 160,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,479
<BONDS>                                        185,727
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           25,625
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                   (105,707)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   160,791
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               314,933
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  306,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,057)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (254)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,803)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (5,525)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,328)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: 

United States International Trade Commission. 

# TIME AND DATE: 

May 17, 2000 at 11:00 a.m. 

# PLACE: 

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS: 

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agenda for future meeting: none.

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. No. 731-TA-677 (Review)(Coumarin from China)—briefing and vote. (The Commission will transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on May 30, 2000.). 

5. Outstanding action jackets: (1) Document No. GC-00-020: Administrative matters.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

By order of the Commission.

Issued: May 5, 2000.

Donna R. Koehnke, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-11756 Filed 5-8-00; 10:10 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### SORTER v. NEWTON STATE BANK & TRUST CO.

No. 19759.

Opinion Filed Dec. 2, 1930.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 20, 1931.

Dickson & Dickson, for plaintiff in error.

Rizley, Loofbourrow & Sweet and' Miles- *&*Miles,c for defendant in error.

LESTER, V.

O. J. The parties appear in the same order as in the district court. The plaintiff brought suit to set aside a sheriff’s deed, which deed was executed by the sheriff after a sale of certain real estate under a judgment and order of the district court.

The plaintiff in her petition alleged that no valid judgment had ever been entered authorizing the sale of plaintiff’s interest in said real estate.

A demurrer was sustained to plaintiff’s petition. Plaintiff elected to rely upon her original -petition. Judgment was then- entered in favor of the defendant, and from this judgment the plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff in her petition filed in district court alleged that the court clerk’s entry of the minutes in the journal entry-shows judgment rendered against Elijah D. Sorter and Elizabeth Sorter as per journal entry and that the court clerk’s entry on said judgment docket shows judgment against Elijah D. Sorter and Elizabeth Sorter as per journal entry; that final judgment as shown by the journal of the court shows that judgment was rendered against Elijah Dl Sorter and Lennie Sorter.

The plaintiff, Lennie Sorter, does not make any complaint against the incompleteness or error in the final journal entry.

The principal complaint is lodged against the minutes as shown by the court clerk’s journal’ wherein the court entered therein judgment against Elizabeth Sorter as one of the parties defendants, whereas the final judgment was entered against the plaintiff herein, Lennie Sorter. Plaintiff alleges and contends that this constitutes a fatal variance between the memorandum of the minutes of the clerk as contained in clerk’s journal and the final journal entry of the judgment.

In 0. J. 33, section, 132, it is said;

> “Where, upon an inspection of the whole record, the identity of the parties named in the judgment and the pleading is clear, the apparent variance will be held to be a clerical misprision and immaterial, or at least amendable.”

In the case of Halsell v. McMurphy, 86 Tex. 100. it is held:

> “In the judgment entry in a suit against .Tames L. Thompkins and Gilbert L. Me-Murphy. partners, the name of Gabriel ap*136peared instead of Gilbert. Held, that as from the entire record it clearly appeared that the name Gabriel was a clerical error, such error did not affect a sale under execution against the real defendants.”

Judgment is affirmed.

HUNT, RILEY, CLARK, HEFNER, CULLISON, SWINDALL, and ANDREWS, JJ., concur. MASON, C. J., absent.
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
24/7 Real Media, Inc.:

    We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-47074, 333-89985 and 333-36144) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-56308,
333-35306, 333-83287 and 333-34020) on Form S-8 of 24/7 Real Media, Inc. of our
report dated March 29, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of 24/7
Real Media, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows, for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2001, which report appears in the
December 31, 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K of 24/7 Real Media, Inc.

    Our report dated March 29, 2002, contains an explanatory paragraph that
states that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations since
inception and has a working capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
that uncertainty.

                                          /s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
April 1, 2002
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of InterDent, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert W. Hill, Vice President, Finance& Accounting of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 20, 2003

 
|   | /s/ ROBERT W. HILL                            |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert W. Hill                                |
|   | **Vice President, Finance &  Accounting** |

 

1

----