alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 91.9 Civil aircraft flight manual, marking, and placard requirements. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, no person may operate a civil aircraft without complying with the operating limitations specified in the approved Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual, markings, and placards, or as otherwise prescribed by the certificating authority of the country of registry.
( b ) No person may operate a U.S.-registered civil aircraft— ( 1 ) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is required by § 21.5 of this chapter unless there is available in the aircraft a current, approved Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual or the manual provided for in § 121.141(b); and
( 2 ) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not required by § 21.5 of this chapter, unless there is available in the aircraft a current approved Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual, approved manual material, markings, and placards, or any combination thereof.
( c ) No person may operate a U.S.-registered civil aircraft unless that aircraft is identified in accordance with part 45 or 48of this chapter.
( d ) Any person taking off or landing a helicopter certificated under part 29 of this chapter at a heliport constructed over water may make such momentary flight as is necessary for takeoff or landing through the prohibited range of the limiting height-speed envelope established for the helicopter if that flight through the prohibited range takes place over water on which a safe ditching can be accomplished and if the helicopter is amphibious or is equipped with floats or other emergency flotation gear adequate to accomplish a safe emergency ditching on open water.
[Docket No. 18334, 54 FR 34292, Aug. 18, 1989, as amended by ; Docket No. FAA-2022-1355, Amdt. No. 91-366, 87 FR 75846, Dec. 9, 2022]
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 5D 22

- 1950 LT Case No. 2020

- CF

- 1001

_____________________________
G ERALD W. M ILLS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County

. David B. Eddy , Judge

. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Ryan M. Belanger, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach , for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance
, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

November 7, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.

E ISNAUGLE , B OATWRIGHT , and M AC I VER , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
§ 65.67 Aircraft dispatcher certification courses: Personnel. ( a ) Each applicant for an aircraft dispatcher certification course must meet the following personnel requirements: ( 1 ) Each applicant must have adequate personnel, including one instructor who holds an aircraft dispatcher certificate and is available to coordinate all training course instruction.
( 2 ) Each applicant must not exceed a ratio of 25 students for one instructor.
( b ) The instructor who teaches the practical dispatch applications area of the appendix A course must hold an aircraft dispatchers certificate
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TOWER FINANCIAL CORPORATION
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,308,968
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       3,182,528
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            20,741,220
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             1,425,620
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        20,828,044
<LOANS>                                     94,217,729
<ALLOWANCE>                                (1,409,509)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             141,294,600
<DEPOSITS>                                 119,287,509
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            632,570
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,530,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,634,521
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             141,294,600
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,758,097
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              112,466
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               353,287
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,223,850
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,041,977
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,044,856
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,178,994
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,123,187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (150,750)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (150,750)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (150,750)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           (1,409,509)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
§ 450.113 Flight safety analysis requirements—scope. ( a ) An operator must perform and document a flight safety analysis for all phases of flight, except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, as follows— ( 1 ) For orbital launch, from liftoff through orbital insertion, and through all component impacts or landings;
( 2 ) For suborbital launch, from liftoff through all component impacts or landings;
( 3 ) For disposal, from the initiation of the deorbit through final impact; and
( 4 ) For reentry, from the initiation of the deorbit through all component impacts or landing.
( b ) An operator is not required to perform and document a flight safety analysis for a phase of flight if agreed to by the Administrator based on demonstrated reliability. An operator demonstrates reliability by using operational and flight history to show compliance with the risk criteria in § 450.101(a) and (b).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

RONALD L. GLAZER AND LAURA L. GLAZER,

Petitioners

v.

BERNARD A. MOORE, SJ; COURT

ADMINISTRATION

- CIVIL DIVISION,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 79 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of July, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED

, and the Petition for Review in the Nature of a Mandamus is

DENIED . The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the

caption.
From: Robert Hurt [ mailto:Bob.Hurt@Daltile.com ]

Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 8:22 PM

To: Nizich, Sharon

Cc: gilberg@guidaslavichflores.com

Subject: Waiver of CBI Claim

Ms. Nizich,

As an authorized representative of Dal

- Tile Corporation and Dal Italia LLC, I hereby waive the previous

claims of Confidential Business Information for production related data listed in the files on the 2 CDs

received to day in correspondence from Mr. Keith Barnett dated 04/16/13 (see attached file).

This waiver is also intended to cover any/all previous CBI claims associated with stack testing reports

submitted for the Dal

- Tile facility located in El Paso, Texas and the D al Italia facility in Muskogee, OK.

(See attached file: CBI Dal

- Tile and Dal Italia_Barnett 04

- 16

- 2013.pdf)

Regards,

Robert (Bob) Hurt

Director

- Environmental, Health & Safety

Dal

- Tile Corporation

7834 CF Hawn Freeway

Dallas, TX 75217

office 214.309.4891

mobile 972.921.6062

e.mail bob.hurt@daltile.com

www.daltile.com/leed
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Detail

# Working the Land With 10 Acres: Small Acreage Farming in the United States

Economic Information Bulletin No. (EIB-123) 31 pp, April 2014

by Doris  Newton

Approximately 294,000 U.S. farms operated on 10 or fewer acres in 2007. While most small acreage (SA) operations did little farming, about 50,000 had sales of $10,000 or more in 2007. This report focuses on SA farms, especially those grossing $10,000 or more per year, and examines such characteristics as production strategies, types of products, sales, household income, and financial performance.

**Keywords:** Small acreage farming, farm structure, farm financial performance, farm operator household income, 10 acres or less, women farmers, women principal and secondary operators, small acreage farm characteristics, small farms

**In this publication...**

-  Entire Report 
-  Report summary 
-  Download zip file for EIB123 

-  Cattle & Beef 
-  Dairy 
-  Hogs & Pork 
-  Poultry & Eggs 
-  Fruit & Tree Nuts 
-  Vegetables & Pulses 
-  Agricultural Research and Productivity 
-  Beginning & Disadvantaged Farmers 
-  Farm Household Well-being 
-  Farm Sector Income & Finances 
-  Farm Structure and Organization 

-  Aquaculture Data 
-  ARMS Farm Financial and Crop Production Practices 
-  Farm Household Income and Characteristics 
-  Farm Income and Wealth Statistics 
-  Fruit and Tree Nut Data 
-  Livestock & Meat Domestic Data 
-  Vegetables and Pulses Data 

**Last updated:** Tuesday, April 29, 2014

**For more information contact:** Doris  Newton
635 A.2d 424

#### JARVIS STEEL & LUMBER CO., INC. v. William DEMPSEY, Ind. & Jointly, Paul Greenstein, Ind. & Jointly, t/a Royal Development Company.

No. 85,

Sept. Term, 1993.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Jan. 12, 1994.

Cynthia E. Young, Annapolis, for petitioner.

Randall E. Goff, Arnold, for respondent.

Argued Before MURPHY, C.J., RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, KARWACKI, ROBERT M. BELL, RAKER, and ORTH, CHARLES E. Jr. (Retired and specially assigned).

ORDER

The petition for writ of certiorari in the above entitled case having been granted and heard, it is this 12th day of January, 1994

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.
#### § 398.7 Timing of flights.

To qualify as essential air service, flights must depart at reasonable times, considering the needs of passengers with connecting flights at the hub. It is the policy of the Department to consider the reasonableness of the time in view of the purpose for which the local passengers are traveling. If travel is primarily to connect with other flights at the hub, local flight times should be designed to link with those flights. If travel is primarily local (*i.e.,* to and from the hub), there should be at least one morning flight in each direction and one late-afternoon or evening flight in each direction.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greens Worldwide Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Thomas Kidd, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ R. Thomas Kidd

______________________________________

R Thomas Kidd

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



December  15, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 93 (Friday, May 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30605-30606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11943]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of amendment to approved Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act 
(IGRA),

[[Page 30606]]

Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall 
publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved Tribal-State 
Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming on Indian 
lands. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, Department of the 
Interior, through his delegated authority, has approved the Amendment 
to the Interim Agreement with the State of Montana and the Confederated 
Salish and Kootenai Tribes, which was executed on March 21, 2000.

DATES: This action is effective May 12, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 
20240. (202) 219-4066.

    Dated: May 3, 2000.
Kevin Gover,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 00-11943 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

March 14, 2011

Barry Wallerstein, Env.D.

Executive Director

South Coast AQMD

21865 Copley Drive

Diamond Bar, CA 91765

Re: Final Technical System Audit Report on the South Coast Air Quality Management District

Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Pro gram

, April 13

– 16, 2010

Dear Dr. Wallerstein:

I am writing to transmit EPA’s report on the findings of our Technical System Audit

(TSA) of SCAQMD’s ambient air monitoring program . This audit was performed in accordance

with 40 CFR Part 58, Section 2.5 , which requires that EPA conduct technical system audits of

Primary Quality Assurance Organizations every three years.

EPA reviewed SCAQMD ’s ambient air monitoring program, including network

management, field operations, lab oratory operations, quality a ssurance

, and data management

procedures. Overall, we found that SCAQMD has a robust air monitoring program that

generally meets or exceeds EPA requirements. As with any audit, this TSA uncovered some

program areas within the agency that can be improved. We look forward to working together as

you develop a corrective action response to our audit findings , which is due within 60 days of

receipt of the final TSA report

.

I want to thank you and your staff for the full cooperation and participation we were

g iven during the audit. The results of this audit contribute to EPA ’ s overall understanding of

ambient monitoring in your District

.

Please contact me if you have questions or your staff may contact Meredith Kurpius at

(415) 947

- 45 34 or Matthew Lakin at ( 415) 972

- 3851

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Deborah Jordan

Director, Air Division

Enclosure

cc: Dr. Chung S. Liu, SCAQMD

Rudy Eden, SCAQMD

Dr. Phillip M. Fine, SCAQMD

Dr. Jason C. Low, SCAQMD
§ 100.624 Discharge of indebtedness; reporting requirements. ( a ) Before discharging a delinquent debt (also referred to as close-out of a debt), the NLRB shall take all appropriate steps to collect the debt in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3711(g), including, as applicable, administrative offset, tax refund offset, Federal salary offset, referral to Treasury or Treasury-designated collection centers or private collection contractors, credit bureau reporting, wage garnishment, litigation, and foreclosure. Discharge of indebtedness is distinct from termination or suspension of collection activity and is governed by the Internal Revenue Code. When the NLRB determines that it will discharge a debt, it will do so in accordance with the provisions of 31 CFR 903.5.
( b ) [Reserved]
06/08/2006 THU 16: 44 'FAX 15205623435 

DISTRICT 3 SERVICE CENTER 

POST OFFICE BOX 546 

OFFICE: (520) 562-3334 

, FAX: (520) 562-3435 

Cl Urgent For Roviow Please Comment f3 Please Reply Please Rocycle 
Phone: 520-562-2234 

Fax: 520-562-2245 

Department of 

firikonmend 

Qudw 

Fax 

To: From: 7 )@-ha/ F~dl-? 

Date: h /&/& 1 

/ / 

Pages: [ 2 ] includmg cover sheet 

Re:. CC: 

Urgent For Review El Please Comment LI Please Reply Please Recycle 

Comments: 
06/08/2006 THU 16: 44 FAX 15205623435 

GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY 

SACATON, AZ 85247 

DISTRICT 3 SERVICE CENTER 

POST OFFICE BOX 546 

OFFICE: (520) 562-3334 

FAX: (520) 562-3435 

Agenda Request Form. 

Date: OH P 20, 7mfi 

(Please provide the date yo11 arekcquesting to I)e placed on the agenda. Cum~ll~loity 

lrlecti~lgs are I~eld every first ant1 third Tucstlay of titc month.) 

rropic: /?nndan/ Pfign.,,of. ,,,, >,,, brn J! 

f'prlbd~/, fh GRTL 7-f/2Q/~~tmprfifi~n 

fdr h;r QCC&/~~ 

Who will reprcscnt thc 2' 

topic: TQA - e f FQ~,+/ ( 30 fi L?? ~itle:fl,h a,'/+ Gecj b&f 

What items Iistcd below does this request nee$ to be placed I>y? 

Ptcase clreck onc: 

I7 Old J311si11ess M~c~orts 111 New Btrsirless 

I:'IFinancial Request UMisccllar~eous 

Contact person/plione - 

number:, ~mef Gq r/lj fjZd) <&"2 -2~34 dzgd / 

**PLEASE I'IIOVIDE A SHORT SIJMMAIIY OF 1'13F!SENTArTXON'r'0 I3It 

INC1,lJ.DED POSTINC; OF THE AGENDA*" 

Return By: 

Date Received: ,, Initial:
§ 93.163 Aircraft operations. ( a ) Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, no person may operate an aircraft within the airspace described in § 93.162, or taxi onto the runway at Pearson Field, unless- ( 1 ) That person establishes two-way radio communications with Pearson Advisory on the common traffic advisory frequency for the purpose of receiving air traffic advisories and continues to monitor the frequency at all times while operating within the specified airspace.
( 2 ) That person has obtained the Pearson Field weather prior to establishing two-way communications with Pearson Advisory.
( b ) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, if two-way radio communications failure occurs in flight, a person may operate an aircraft within the airspace described in § 93.162, and land, if weather conditions are at or above basic VFR weather minimums. If two-way radio communications failure occurs while in flight under IFR, the pilot must comply with § 91.185.
( c ) Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, persons operating an aircraft within the airspace described in § 93.162 must— ( 1 ) When operating over the runway or extended runway centerline of Pearson Field Runway 8/26 maintain an altitude at or below 700 feet above mean sea level.
( 2 ) Remain outside Portland Class C Airspace.
( 3 ) Make a right traffic pattern when operating to/from Pearson Field Runway 26.
§ 91.1055 Pilot operating limitations and pairing requirement. ( a ) If the second in command of a fixed-wing program aircraft has fewer than 100 hours of flight time as second in command flying in the aircraft make and model and, if a type rating is required, in the type aircraft being flown, and the pilot in command is not an appropriately qualified check pilot, the pilot in command shall make all takeoffs and landings in any of the following situations: ( 1 ) Landings at the destination airport when a Destination Airport Analysis is required by § 91.1037(c); and
( 2 ) In any of the following conditions: ( i ) The prevailing visibility for the airport is at or below 3 ⁄ 4 mile.
( ii ) The runway visual range for the runway to be used is at or below 4,000 feet.
( iii ) The runway to be used has water, snow, slush, ice or similar contamination that may adversely affect aircraft performance.
( iv ) The braking action on the runway to be used is reported to be less than “good.”
( v ) The crosswind component for the runway to be used is in excess of 15 knots.
( vi ) Windshear is reported in the vicinity of the airport.
( vii ) Any other condition in which the pilot in command determines it to be prudent to exercise the pilot in command's authority.
( b ) No program manager may release a program flight under this subpart unless, for that aircraft make or model and, if a type rating is required, for that type aircraft, either the pilot in command or the second in command has at least 75 hours of flight time, either as pilot in command or second in command. The Administrator may, upon application by the program manager, authorize deviations from the requirements of this paragraph by an appropriate amendment to the management specifications in any of the following circumstances: ( 1 ) A newly authorized program manager does not employ any pilots who meet the minimum requirements of this paragraph.
( 2 ) An existing program manager adds to its fleet a new category and class aircraft not used before in its operation.
( 3 ) An existing program manager establishes a new base to which it assigns pilots who will be required to become qualified on the aircraft operated from that base.
( c ) No person may be assigned in the capacity of pilot in command in a program operation to more than two aircraft types that require a separate type rating.
#### § 103.2 Symphony orchestras.

The Board will assert its jurisdiction in any proceeding arising under sections 8, 9, and 10 of the Act involving any symphony orchestra which has a gross annual revenue from all sources (excluding only contributions which are because of limitation by the grantor not available for use for operating expenses) of not less than $1 million.

[38 FR 6177, Mar. 7, 1973]
§ 71.11 Air Traffic Service (ATS) routes. Unless otherwise specified, the following apply: ( a ) An Air Traffic Service (ATS) route is based on a centerline that extends from one navigation aid, fix, or intersection, to another navigation aid, fix, or intersection (or through several navigation aids, fixes, or intersections) specified for that route.
( b ) An ATS route does not include the airspace of a prohibited area.
[Doc. No. FAA-2003-14698, 68 FR 16947, Apr. 8, 2003, as amended by Amdt. 71-33, 70 FR 23004, May 3, 2005]
#### § 1425.5 Referral to FSIP.

If the mediation process has been completed and the parties are at a negotiation impasse, the Service or the parties may request consideration of the matter by the Federal Services Impasses Panel. The Service shall not refer a case to FSIP until the mediation process has been exhausted and the parties are at a negotiation impasse.