alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 100.201 Audits and investigations. ( a ) Employees shall cooperate fully with any audit or investigation conducted by the Office of the Inspector General involving matters that fall within the jurisdiction and authority of the Inspector General, as defined in the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, or with any audit or investigation conducted by any Agency official or department, including, but not limited to, the Office of Equal Employment Opportunity, involving matters that relate to or have an effect on the official business of the Agency. Such cooperation shall include, among other things, responding to requests for information, providing statements under oath relating to such audits or investigations, and affording access to Agency records and/or any other Agency materials in an employee's possession.
( b ) The obstruction of an audit or investigation, concealment of information, intentional furnishing of false or misleading information, refusal to provide information and/or answer questions, or refusal to provide a statement under oath, by an employee to an auditor or investigator pursuant to any audit or investigation as described in paragraph (a) of this section, may result in disciplinary action against an employee. However, nothing herein shall be construed to deny, abridge, or otherwise restrict the rights, privileges, or other entitlements or protections afforded to Agency employees.
[59 FR 37158, July 21, 1994]
§ 431.71 Public safety responsibility. ( a ) A licensee is responsible for ensuring the safe conduct of an RLV mission and for protecting public health and safety and the safety of property during the conduct of the mission.
( b ) A licensee must conduct a licensed RLV mission and perform RLV safety procedures in accordance with representations made in its license application. A licensee's failure to perform safety procedures in accordance with the representations made in the license application or comply with any license condition is sufficient basis for the revocation of a license or other appropriate nforcement action.
###### Editorial Note on Part 302

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 302.308 Replies to answers.

Within seven (7) days after the last day for filing an answer, any interested party may file a reply to one or more answers.
§ 415.131 Flight safety system crew data. ( a ) An applicant's safety review document must identify each flight safety system crew position and the role of that crewmember during launch processing and flight of a launch vehicle.
( b ) An applicant's safety review document must describe the certification program for flight safety system crewmembers established to ensure compliance with §§ 417.105 and 417.311 of this chapter.
#### In the Matter of Edward J. Mooney, Respondent, against S. Howard Cohen et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, et al., Appellants.

(Submitted October 23, 1936;

decided October 23, 1936.)

Motion to amend the remittitur granted. When we reversed the Special Term order we reversed the ruling that the questions submitted should not appear on the ballot. We thereby decided that *both*questions should be placed upon the ballot to be voted on at the coming election. To avoid any further misunderstanding, we add to the remittitur following the words of reversal, *“*and the motion to strike both the questions submitted from the ballot is denied, without costs.” (See 272 N. Y. 33.)
#### Catherine Fearon, Appellant, *v.*Charles Treanor, Respondent.

Submitted January 25, 1937;

decided March 3, 1937.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 272 N. Y. 268.)
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Required by Rule 13a-14(b)
or 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Advanstar Communications Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David W. Montgomery, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|By: |  | /s/DAVID W. MONTGOMERYDavid W. Montgomery
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

Date:
March 29, 2005

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1579

ALEMAYEHU WOLDEMARIAM,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A24-601-749)

Submitted: March 6, 2006 Decided: March 17, 2006

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Allan Ebert, LAW OFFICES OF ALLAN EBERT, Washington, D.C., for

Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M.

Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Eric W. Marsteller,

Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Alemayehu Woldemariam, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal of an Immigration Judge’s

order denying him a waiver of inadmissibility under § 212(c) of the

Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c). 

On appeal, Woldemariam argues that a July 17, 2001 in

absentia order of removal was implicitly rescinded when the

Immigration Judge accepted his application for a § 212(c) waiver

and thus he is in fact a lawful permanent resident eligible for the

waiver. We find no evidence in the record that the July 17, 2001

order of removal was ever rescinded. Thus, Woldemariam was no

longer a lawful permanent resident and was not eligible for the

§ 212(c) waiver. Accordingly, Woldemariam’s contention lacks

merit. 

Woldemariam further asserts that the court violated his

due process rights when it determined that he was ineligible for

the § 212(c) waiver and § 212(a)(2)(A)(ii) petty offense exception

based on the allegation of multiple convictions for which he was

never charged in the Notice to Appear. This argument is also

without merit. First, the denial of a request for a waiver of

inadmissibility pursuant to § 212(c) cannot constitute a due

process violation, because an alien has no constitutionallyprotected liberty or property interest in the “right” to
- 3 -

discretionary relief. See Smith v. Ashcroft, 295 F.3d 425, 429

(4th Cir. 2002). Moreover, Woldemariam’s application for a

§ 212(c) waiver was denied because he was not a lawful permanent

resident, not because he allegedly had multiple convictions.

Finally, Woldemariam was denied eligibility for the

§ 212(a)(2)(A)(ii) exception because he faced a maximum of five

years in prison for his forgery conviction, not because of multiple

convictions. 

Accordingly the petition for review is denied. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<PAGE>
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-114201 and No. 333-122738) on Form S-8 of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. of
our report dated March 30, 2005, with respect to the balance sheets of Memory
Pharmaceuticals Corp. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related
statements of operations, stockholders' equity/(deficit), and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, which report
appears in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Memory
Pharmaceuticals Corp.

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 30, 2005
**Exhibit 13**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Rhodia S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:

|   | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                 |   |   |                                             |
|----------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
| Date: April 10, 2006 |   |   | /S/JEAN-PIERRE          CLAMADIEU                |
|                 |   |   | Jean-Pierre Clamadieu

Chief Executive Officer** |

 

 

|                 |   |   |                                                                                                      |
|----------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: April 10, 2006 |   |   | /S/ PASCAL          BOUCHIAT                                                                              |
|                 |   |   | Pascal          Bouchiat

Group          Executive Vice President and

Chief          Financial Officer** |

 

 

----
#### § 67.305 Ear, nose, throat, and equilibrium.

Ear, nose, throat, and equilibrium standards for a third-class airman medical certificate are:

(a) The person shall demonstrate acceptable hearing by at least one of the following tests:

(1) Demonstrate an ability to hear an average conversational voice in a quiet room, using both ears, at a distance of 6 feet from the examiner, with the back turned to the examiner.

(2) Demonstrate an acceptable understanding of speech as determined by audiometric speech discrimination testing to a score of at least 70 percent obtained in one ear or in a sound field environment.

(3) Provide acceptable results of pure tone audiometric testing of unaided hearing acuity according to the following table of worst acceptable thresholds, using the calibration standards of the American National Standards Institute, 1969:

| Frequency (Hz) | 500 Hz | 1000 Hz | 2000 Hz | 3000 Hz |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Better ear (Db) | 35 | 30 | 30 | 40 |
| Poorer ear (Db) | 35 | 50 | 50 | 60 |

(b) No disease or condition of the middle or internal ear, nose, oral cavity, pharynx, or larynx that—

(1) Interferes with, or is aggravated by, flying or may reasonably be expected to do so; or

(2) Interferes with clear and effective speech communication.

(c) No disease or condition manifested by, or that may reasonably be expected to be manifested by, vertigo or a disturbance of equilibrium.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**Subsidiariesof Advanstar Communications, Inc.**

 
| **Name**                                     | ** ** | **State/Country of Incorporation**         |
|----------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Advanstar Communications  (UK) Ltd.          |       | United Kingdom, under the  laws of England and Wales |
| Advanstar Holdings GmbH                      |       | Germany                                              |
| Applied Business  teleCommunications         |       | California                                           |
| Brand & License  Limited            |       | United Kingdom                                       |
| CME2, Inc.                              |       | Delaware                                             |
| Men’s Apparel Guild in  California Inc. |       | California                                           |
| Project Global Tradeshow,  Inc.              |       | New York                                             |
| Telebusiness Exhibitions  Limited            |       | United Kingdom, under the  laws of England and Wales |

 

1

----
§ 29.675 Stops. ( a ) Each control system must have stops that positively limit the range of motionof the pilot's controls.
( b ) Each stop must be located in the system so that the range of travel of its control is not appreciably affected by— ( 1 ) Wear;
( 2 ) Slackness; or
( 3 ) Takeup adjustments.
( c ) Each stop must be able to withstand the loads corresponding to the design conditions for the system.
( d ) For each main rotor blade— ( 1 ) Stops that are appropriate to the blade design must be provided to limit travel of the blade about its hinge points; and
( 2 ) There must be means to keep the blade from hitting the droop stops during any operation other than starting and stopping the rotor.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424), sec. 6(c), Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150. Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-17, 43 FR 50599, Oct. 30, 1978]
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 22 (Friday, February 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 7424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02167]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

National Coal Council

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the National Coal Council 
(NCC). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 
770) requires that public notice of these meetings be announced in the 
Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, March 7, 2013, 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hunton & Williams LLP, 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20037.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Robert J. Wright, U.S. Department 
of Energy; 4G-036/Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., 
Washington, DC 20585-1290; Telephone: 202-586-0429.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of Meeting: The March 2013 meeting of the National Coal 
Council.
    Agenda:

1. Opening Remarks by NCC Chairman John Eaves
2. Howard Gruenspecht, U.S. Energy Information Administration: ``The 
U.S. Energy Outlook''
3. Fred Palmer, NCC Coal Policy Committee Chairman: Presentation of 
Summary of Past Council Studies
4. Mike Duncan, President, American Coalition for Clean Coal 
Electricity
5. Jim Butz, Vice President of Product Management, Novinda Corp.: 
``Mercury Emissions Control at Coal-Based Generation Plants''
6. General Keith Alexander (Ret.): Presentation on ``Cyber Security in 
the U.S.'' (invited)
7. Adjourn

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. If you 
would like to file a written statement with the Council, you may do so 
either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral 
statements regarding any item on the agenda, you should contact Dr. 
Robert J. Wright, 202-586-0429 or Robert.wright@hq.doe.gov (email). You 
must make your request for an oral statement at least 5 business days 
before the meeting. Reasonable provision will be made to include oral 
statements on the scheduled agenda. The Chairperson of the Council will 
lead the meeting in a manner that facilitates the orderly conduct of 
business. Oral statements are limited to 10-minutes per organization 
and per person.
    Minutes: The NCC will prepare meeting minutes within 45 days of the 
meeting. The minutes will be posted on the NCC Web site at http://www.nationalcoalcouncil.org/.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on January 25, 2013.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-02167 Filed 1-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
§ 77.21 Department of Defense (DOD) airport imaginary surfaces. ( a ) *Related to airport reference points.* These surfaces apply to all military airports. For the purposes of this section, a military airport is any airport operated by the DOD. ( 1 ) *Inner horizontal surface.* A plane that is oval in shape at a height of 150 feet above the established airfield elevation. The plane is constructed by scribing an arc with a radius of 7,500 feet about the centerline at the end of each runway and interconnecting these arcs with tangents.
( 2 ) *Conical surface.* A surface extending from the periphery of the inner horizontal surface outward and upward at a slope of 20 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 7,000 feet to a height of 500 feet above the established airfield elevation.
( 3 ) *Outer horizontal surface.* A plane, located 500 feet above the established airfield elevation, extending outward from the outer periphery of the conical surface for a horizontal distance of 30,000 feet.
( b ) *Related to runways.* These surfaces apply to all military airports. ( 1 ) *Primary surface.* A surface located on the ground or water longitudinally centered on each runway with the same length as the runway. The width of the primary surface for runways is 2,000 feet. However, at established bases where substantial construction has taken place in accordance with a previous lateral clearance criteria, the 2,000-foot width may be reduced to the former criteria.
( 2 ) *Clear zone surface.* A surface located on the ground or water at each end of the primary surface, with a length of 1,000 feet and the same width as the primary surface.
( 3 ) *Approach clearance surface.* An inclined plane, symmetrical about the runway centerline extended, beginning 200 feet beyond each end of the primary surface at the centerline elevation of the runway end and extending for 50,000 feet. The slope of the approach clearance surface is 50 to 1 along the runway centerline extended until it reaches an elevation of 500 feet above the established airport elevation. It then continues horizontally at this elevation to a point 50,000 feet from the point of beginning. The width of this surface at the runway end is the same as the primary surface, it flares uniformly, and the width at 50,000 is 16,000 feet.
( 4 ) *Transitional surfaces.* These surfaces connect the primary surfaces, the first 200 feet of the clear zone surfaces, and the approach clearance surfaces to the inner horizontal surface, conical surface, outer horizontal surface or other transitional surfaces. The slope of the transitional surface is 7 to 1 outward and upward at right angles to the runway centerline.
§ 91.1701 Applicability. ( a ) On and after November 7, 2016, all training conducted in an MU-2B must follow an approved MU-2B training program that meets the standards of this subpart.
( b ) This subpart applies to all persons who operate a Mitsubishi MU-2B series airplane, including those who act as pilot in command, act as second-in-command, or other persons who manipulate the controls while under the supervision of a pilot in command.
( c ) This subpart also applies to those persons who provide pilot training for a Mitsubishi MU-2B series airplane. The requirements in this subpart are in addition to the requirements of parts 61, 91, and 135 of this chapter.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**Certification**

 

The undersigned officer ofCapital Crossing Preferred Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies thatthe Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June30, 2002 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.  This certification is provided solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 
| Date: August 14, 2002 | By: /s/ EDWARD F. MEHM                   |   |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  | Edward F.  Mehm                          |
|                  | Treasurer  (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
Shamsher Medih Chisti wi*0** o£M^

TDCJ-ID No. 1490300 ^rx)0^°F^s

James A. Lynaugh Unit ^vSuS*01*"

1098, South Hwy 2037 t\ 1N&

Fort Stockton, Tx 79735

To, c^f^

Christopher A. Prine

Clerk of the Court

First Court of Appeals

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Tx 77002 Date: March 09, 2015

Style: Shamsher Medih Chisti v. Sana Chisti aka Kiran Wilwerding

Appellant Case Number: 01-13-00780-CV

Trial Court Case Number: 2013-12431

Trial Court 257th District Court of Harris County, Texas

Dear Clerk,

Greetings. On February 10, 2015, my case was set for Sub

mission in the above case number. The Appellees/was^ given 10 days to

file Supplemental Clerk Record on January>29>i2015, Pursuant to Texas

Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 34.5(c), about the special clerk's

record on Plaintiff's Motion to Reinstate/Filing letter dated June 24,

2013. This notice was for 10 days to file the special clerk's record.

The Clerk of the trial Court file the Special Supplemental Clerk's

Record on February 20, 2015, delaying the process of Appellant Court's

Submission date of February 10, 2015.

Now it has been more than 30 days,from the date of Submission, I

didn;t received any Court Order or Memorandum of Order for the Submis

sions set for February 10, 2015.

Can you please inform me about the Status of my case and there is

any Court Order on my Appeal;.

Thank you so much for your time and attention in this matter.

eP *•

ocj file Sh^)ji5^r^%dih Chisti

.lant Pro-Se
Chisti Shamsher #1490300

James A. Lyriaugh Unit

1098, South Hwy2037

Fort Stockton, Tx 79735

***Legal Mail***

To,

Chr

Cle

Fir

301 

Hou

?70O25.206