alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0099

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

MATTHEW MORGAN MAYS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 18, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 14 2023

08/14/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0099
EXHIBIT 21.1
  Subsidiaries
    of Digital River, Inc.
  State or JurisdictionSubsidiaries

of IncorporationBlueHornet Networks, Inc.

CaliforniaCCNow, Inc.

MinnesotaCustomCD, Inc.

DelawareDigital River do Brasil Servicos Administrativos Limitada

BrazilDigital River Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd

ChinaDigital River (Cyprus) Limited

CyprusDigital River
    E-Business
    Services, Inc.

DelawareDigital River GmbH

GermanyDigital River Holding GmbH

GermanyDigital River International S.a.r.l

LuxembourgDigital River Ireland Limited

IrelandDigital River Japan K.K

JapanDigital River Korea YH

KoreaDigital River Marketing Solutions, Inc.

DelawareDigital River Taiwan

TaiwanDigital River Mexico, S de R.L. de C.V.

MexicoDigital River Technology Limited

IrelandDigital River UK Limited

United KingdomDR APAC, Inc.

MinnesotaDR Express, Inc.

DelawareDR
    E-Subscription
    Services, Inc.

DelawareDR globalDirect, Inc.

DelawareDR globalTech, Inc.

Delawareelement 5, Inc.

DelawareNetGiro Payments AB

SwedenNetGiro Services AB

SwedenNetGiro Systems AB

SwedenRegSoft, Inc.

GeorgiaShareIt!, Inc.

Pennsylvania
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4649 

To provide that for purposes of determining compliance with title IX of 

the Education Amendments of 1972 in athletics, sex shall be recognized 

based solely on a person’s reproductive biology and genetics at birth. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2020 

Mrs. LOEFFLER (for herself, Mr. LEE, Mr. LANKFORD, Mrs. BLACKBURN, 

and Mr. COTTON) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To provide that for purposes of determining compliance with 

title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 in athletics, sex shall be recognized based solely on a person’s 

reproductive biology and genetics at birth. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protection of Women 

5 and Girls in Sports Act of 2020’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4649 IS

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

2 Section 901 of the Education Amendments of 1972 

3 (20 U.S.C. 1681) is amended by adding at the end the 

4 following: 

5 ‘‘(d)(1) It shall be a violation of subsection (a) for 

6 a recipient of Federal funds who operates, sponsors, or 

7 facilitates athletic programs or activities to permit a per8 son whose sex is male to participate in an athletic program 

9 or activity that is designated for women or girls. 

10 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, sex shall be rec11 ognized based solely on a person’s reproductive biology 

12 and genetics at birth.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4664 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from 

gross income for certain waste water management subsidies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2020 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an exclusion from gross income for certain waste water 

management subsidies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATIONS TO INCOME EXCLUSION FOR 

4 CERTAIN WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT SUB5 SIDIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 136(a) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘any subsidy provided’’ and in9 serting ‘‘any subsidy— 

10 ‘‘(1) provided’’, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4664 IS

1 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert2 ing ‘‘, or’’, and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

4 paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(2) provided (directly or indirectly) by a State 

6 or local government to a resident of such State or 

7 locality for the purchase or installation of any waste8 water management measure, but only if such meas9 ure is with respect to the taxpayer’s principal resi10 dence.’’. 

11 (b) DEFINITION OF WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT

12 MEASURE.—Section 136(c) of such Code is amended— 

13 (1) by striking ‘‘ENERGY CONSERVATION

14 MEASURE’’ in the heading thereof and inserting 

15 ‘‘DEFINITIONS’’, 

16 (2) by striking ‘‘IN GENERAL’’ in the heading of 

17 paragraph (1) and inserting ‘‘ENERGY CONSERVA18 TION MEASURE’’, and 

19 (3) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para20 graph (3) and by inserting after paragraph (1) the 

21 following: 

22 ‘‘(2) WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT MEASURE.— 

23 For purposes of this section, the term ‘wastewater 

24 management measure’ means any installation or 

25 modification of property primarily designed to manVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:13 Oct 10, 2020 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4664.IS S4664

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4664 IS

1 age wastewater (including septic tanks and cess2 pools) with respect to one or more dwelling units.’’. 

3 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

4 (1) The heading for section 136 of such Code 

5 is amended— 

6 (A) by inserting ‘‘AND WASTE WATER’’ 

7 after ‘‘ENERGY’’, and 

8 (B) by striking ‘‘PROVIDED BY PUBLIC

9 UTILITIES’’. 

10 (2) The item relating to section 136 in the table 

11 of sections of part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 

12 of such Code is amended— 

13 (A) by inserting ‘‘and waste water’’ after 

14 ‘‘energy’’, and 

15 (B) by striking ‘‘provided by public utili16 ties’’. 

17 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to amounts received after Decem19 ber 31, 2018. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 380
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 380 appear at 84 FR 15940, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 380.66 Cancellation or conditioning of the registration. The registration of a foreign charter operator may be canceled or subjected to additional terms, conditions, or limitations if any of the following occur: ( a ) The operator files a written notice with the Department that it is discontinuing its charter operations;
( b ) A substantial ownership interest is acquired by persons who are not citizens of the same country as the registrant; or
( c ) The Department finds, after notice and an opportunity for responses, that it is in the public interest to do so. In making this finding, the Department will consider whether effective reciprocity exists between the United States and the government of the foreign charter operator.
#### CIESLER v. SYKES et al.

No. 27566.

July 16, 1940.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 10, 1940.

*105 P. 2d 229.*

Reuel W. Little, of Madill, for plaintiff in error.

Don Welch, of Madill, for defendants in error.

HURST, J.

This is a companion case to Ciesler v. Simpson, 187 Okla. 641, 105 P. 2d 227. The parties have filed a stipulation to the effect that the decision in that case shall be controlling in this case, and in accordance with that agreement the judgment appealed from is reversed, with directions to enter judgment for the defendant.

BAYLESS, C. J., and OSBORN, DAVISON, and DANNER, JJ., concur. RILEY and GIBSON, JJ., dissent. WELCH, V. C. J., and CORN, J., absent.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 94 (Monday, May 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12079]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Intent to File an Application for a New License

May 8, 2000.
    Type of Filing: Notice of intent to File An Application for a New 
License.
    b. Project: 2586.
    c. Date Filed: April 24, 2000.
    d. Submitted By: Alabama Electric Cooperative, Inc.--current 
licensee.
    e. Name of Project: Conecuh River Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Conecuh River near the towns of Gantt and River 
Falls, in Covington County, Alabama.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Section 15 of the Federal Power Act.
    h. Licensee Contact: Mike Noel, Alabama Electric Cooperative, Inc., 
2027 East Three Notch Street, Andalusia, AL 36420 (334) 427-3248.
    i. FERC Contact: Ron McKitrick, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e6948988878a82c88b858d8f92948f858da680839485c8808382c89395"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="75071a1b1419115b18161e1c01071c161e35131007165b1310115b0006">[email protected]</span></a>, (770) 
452-3778.
    j. Effective date of current license: May 1, 1965.
    k. Expiration date of current license: April 30, 2005.
    l. Description of the Project: The project consists of the 
following two developments:
    The Point ``A'' Development consists of the following existing 
facilities: (1) A 2,800-foot-long earthen dam comprised of a gated 
concrete spillway section; (2) a 700-acre reservoir at a normal water 
surface elevation of 170 feet msl; (3) a powerhouse, integral with the 
dam, containing three generating units with a total installed capacity 
of 5,200 kW, (4) a 0.39-mile-long, 46-kV transmission line; and (5) 
other appurtenances.
    The Gantt Development consists of the following existing 
facilities: (1) A 1,562-foot-long earthen dam comprised of a gated 
concrete spillway section; (2) a 2,767-acre reservoir at a normal water 
surface elevation of 198 feet msl; (3) a powerhouse, integral with the 
dam, containing two generating units with a total installed capacity of 
3,050 kW, and (4) other appurtenances.
    m. Each application for a new license and any competing license 
applications must be filed with the Commission at least 24 months prior 
to the expiration of the existing license. All applications for license 
for this project must be filed by April 30, 2003.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-12079 Filed 5-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allstates WorldCargo, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Sam
DiGiralomo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

           (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
           of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
           company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of
           operations of the Company for the periods presented.


August 13, 2004


/s/ Sam DiGiralomo
------------------------
Sam DiGiralomo
President and Chief Executive Officer



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
#### § 102.13 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32
                           SATELLITE ENTERPRISES CORP.

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT 20 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Satellite  Enterprises  Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB For the period ended  December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy
Piceni,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 905 of the Sarbanes -
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                       By: /s/ Roy Piceni
                                           ----------------------------
                                           Roy Piceni
                                           Chief Executive Officer and
                                           President


<PAGE>

                           SATELLITE ENTERPRISES CORP.

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT 20 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Satellite  Enterprises  Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB For the period ended  December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the Date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Niels Reijers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 905 of the Sarbanes -Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                        By: /s/ Niels Reijers
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Niels Reijers
                                            Chief Financial Officer
#### § 14.21 Release of classified information to foreign governments.

National security information will be released to foreign governments in accordance with the criteria and procedures stated in the President's Directive entitled “Basic Policy Governing the Release of Classified Defense Information to Foreign Governments” dated September 25, 1958. All requests for the release of such information will be referred to the Deputy Under Secretary for International Labor Affairs.

[50 FR 51391, Dec. 17, 1985, as amended at 72 FR 37098, July 9, 2007]
Exhibit 31.2



Certification of CFO Pursuant to

Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Steven Weldon, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Inverted Paradigms Corporation (Inverted);



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Inverted as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. Inverted other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for Inverted and
have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Inverted is made known to us, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) [Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986 Section
III. E.];



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of Inverted
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in Inverted internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting; and



5. Inverted other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to our auditors and the audit committee of our Board of Directors:



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 8, 2007 |  | /S/ Steven Weldon      
|                       |  | Steven Weldon          
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer



33
###### Editorial Note on Part 747

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 747.801 Applicability.

The rules in this subpart are applicable to a witness who is sworn in a formal investigative proceeding. Formal investigative proceedings may be held before the NCUA Board, before one or more of its members, or before any officer designated by the NCUA Board or its General Counsel, as described in subpart H of this part, and with or without the assistance of such other counsel as the NCUA Board deems appropriate, for the purpose of taking testimony of witnesses, conducting an investigation and receiving other evidence. The term “officer conducting the investigation” shall mean any of the foregoing.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 78 (Friday, April 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 21384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9469]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6978]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Birth of Impressionism: Masterpieces From the Musee 
d'Orsay''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Birth of Impressionism: Masterpieces from 
the Musee d'Orsay,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or 
custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, San 
Francisco, CA, from on or about May 22, 2010, until on or about 
September 6, 2010; Frist Center for the Visual Arts, Nashville, TN, 
from on or about October 15, 2010, until January 23, 2011, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: April 19, 2010.
Judith A. McHale,
Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2010-9469 Filed 4-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-30228

 

ROYAL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

DREDGING SUPPLY COMPANY,

Defendant - Third Party Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,

Third Party Defendant - Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans

01-CV-1224-M

--------------------

January 3, 2003

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant appeals from the summary judgment decision of the

district court dismissing its claims against appellee. 

Specifically, appellant contends that the district court erred by

using the complaint-allegation rule. See, e.g., Selective Ins.
2

Co. of Southeast v. J.B. Mouton & Sons, Inc., 954 F.2d 1075, 1078

(5th Cir. 1992) (applying Louisiana law and employing its

complaint-allegation rule). Appellant also complains that the

district court erred in finding that the complaint was limited in

a manner that did not impose liability on appellee.

We have considered the briefs and the arguments advanced by

the parties at oral argument and we find no error in the district

court’s determination as reflected in its order dismissing claims

against appellee. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the

district court.