alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Annual Report of Atlantica, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), we, Alan D. Gordon, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Shelley Goff, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:March 30, 2010By:/s/Alan D. GordonAlan D. Gordon, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director  Date:March 30, 2010By:/s/Shelley GoffShelley Goff, Secretary, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
October 1 9 , 2017



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF D .L.T. , JR., A CHILD
NO. 14

- 17

- 00376

- CV

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from a judgment terminating parental rights signed May 4, 2017, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. We further order that mandate be issued immediately.
#### § 305.11 Procedures after investigation.

Upon completion of the investigation, where the General Counsel, determines that no corrective action is warranted, the investigation will be closed. Where remedial action is indicated by the investigation, the General Counsel will proceed pursuant to subpart D of part 302 of this chapter (the Rules of Practice) or will take such other action as may be appropriate.

[Doc. No. 82, 50 FR 2421, Jan. 16, 1985, as amended at 65 FR 6456, Feb. 9, 2000; Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15937, Apr. 16, 2019]
ee —e

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

+ | =
y 165°30 ‘be ‘ (" t- . or - 7 . —

SURVEYS, 1968. SEE DETAILED INDEX FOR ACTUAL COVERAGE.

/ 64°35) —1 Le oo Co 7 See —— Co ‘ {
; . . ©
%
XK

! J
‘ ' |
|

‘ j |

{

|

|

|
| \

\
Anchora H
cA \.
+o
Pry ;
od
|
~s
Ff. |
4 100 ie) 100 200 300 miles |
, (so |
: Scale \
INDEX MAP OF ALASKA SHOWING LOCATION OF SEWARD PENINSULA AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL
BS

IN SEWARD

AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS

i) t 2 MILES
‘2. Lene meee: eee A “ Al

T t—— T T T = z |

o7 7 ” 5000 us <u 10,000 FEET

ne

165°30°

pa
7 \
HORIZONTAL SCALE ---__________ 1: 24,000 iL
VERTICAL ‘SCALE ON RECONNAISSANCE PROFILES AS SHOWN
RECONNAISSANCE: ALTITUDE________ 200' AMT |
FLIGHT LINE /___- RECON 2 © 80 ‘hf ("fg s}t+-SERPENTINE HOT SPRINGS
/ J eseqs'} —\__*===" |_| gnogg! AREA OY
©

OFFSHORE NAVIGATION BY DOPPLER RADAR
MAGNETICS BASED ON ARBITRARY DATUM

No
, REGIONAL MAGNETIC GRADIENT NOT REMOVED

|

INDEX MAP SHOWING DETAILED LOCATION OF

ESTIMATED TOTAL INTENSITY OF FIELD: 55,000 GAMMAS

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Released to open file

MEAN INCLINATION: +75° 9 ~ AI HYSICAL SURVEYS IN SEWARD
~<a Mi ‘PE » 1968. ERAGE CONFINED TO
- f Ne ° AREAS ye BY DASHED LINES PLUS
oe P ) TILES. | 4
» 3 “— Pe * ‘ , Ay ‘ Prag.
. . ae Ne ~
ace : “ ri sa Tet \
) ( . * A a
' : ie. SRS
: % ' - Sil si = ie: te &
: ae ee oT y inet mnie. :

PENINSULA

7 ’ OPEN FILE 1969

69-2 165° 15 a:

15
na ie:

64°30'

AREA, ALASKA

— | |
- 64°25

166° 15"
Flown and compiled by Lockwood, Kessler.
and Bartlett, Inc., 1968.

|
NOME BEACH ALASKA

SHEET NUMBER 10 oF 1!
LKB 1968

BEO
This map is preliminary -
and has not been edited
or reviewed for conformity
to Geological Survey standards
# EUR-Lex - 31997D0869 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31997D0869

**97/869/EC: Commission Decision of 11 December 1997 amending Decision 97/467/EC on drawing up provisional lists of third-country establishments from which the Member States authorize imports of rabbit meat and farmed game meat (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 353 , 24/12/1997 P. 0043 - 0044 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 11 December 1997 amending Decision 97/467/EC on drawing up provisional lists of third-country establishments from which the Member States authorize imports of rabbit meat and farmed game meat (Text with EEA relevance) (97/869/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 95/408/EC of 22 June 1995 on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States are authorized to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs (1), as last amended by Council Decision 97/34/EC (2), and in particular Article 2 (4) thereof,

Whereas provisional lists of establishments producing rabbit meat and farmed game meat have been drawn up by Commission Decision 97/467/EC (3);

Whereas negotiations are under way to conclude an agreement with the United States on health measures to protect public health in the context of trade in livestock and products of animal origin;

Whereas the United States have sent a list of establishments producing rabbit meat and farmed game meat and for which the responsible authorities certify that the establishments are in accordance with Community rules;

Whereas Argentina and Canada have sent a list of establishments producing rabbit meat and farmed game meat and for which the responsible authorities certify that the establishments are in accordance with the Community rules;

Whereas a provisional list of establishments producing rabbit meat and farmed game meat can thus be drawn up for the United States of America, Argentina and Canada;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to this Decision is added to the Annex of Decision 97/467/EC.

Article 2

This Decision shall apply from 15 December 1997.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 December 1997.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 243, 11. 10. 1995, p. 17.

(2) OJ L 13, 16. 1. 1997, p. 33.

(3) OJ L 199, 26. 7. 1997, p. 57.

ANNEX

País: USA / Land: USA / Land: USA / ×þñá: ÇÐÁ / Country: USA / Pays: USA / Paese: USA / Land: USA / País: USA / Maa: USA / Land: USA

>TABLE>

País: ARGENTINA / Land: ARGENTINA / Land: ARGENTINIEN / ×þñá: ÁÑÃÅÍÔÉÍÇ / Country: ARGENTINA / Pays: ARGENTINE / Paese: ARGENTINA / Land: ARGENTINIË / País: ARGENTINA / Maa: ARGENTIINA / Land: ARGENTINA

>TABLE>

País: CANADÁ / Land: CANADA / Land: KANADA / ×þñá: ÊÁÍÁÄÁÓ / Country: CANADA / Pays: CANADA / Paese: CANADA / Land: CANADA / País: CANADÁ / Maa: KANADA / Land: KANADA

>TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


I, Robert Ellin, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Amalgamated Technologies, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:


a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant is made known to me,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and


c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and


5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):


a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and


b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: May 19, 2005


/s/ Robert Ellin
Robert Ellin
Chief Financial Officer
#### § 102.39 Rules of evidence controlling so far as practicable.

The hearing will, so far as practicable, be conducted in accordance with the rules of evidence applicable in the district courts of the United States under the rules of civil procedure for the district courts of the United States, adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States pursuant to the Act of June 19, 1934 (U.S.C., title 28, Sections 723-B, 723-C).
#### § 61.121 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes the requirements for the issuance of commercial pilot certificates and ratings, the conditions under which those certificates and ratings are necessary, and the general operating rules for persons who hold those certificates and ratings.
#### § 91.859 Modification to meet Stage 3, Stage 4, or Stage 5 noise levels.

For an airplane subject to § 91.801(c) of this subpart and otherwise prohibited from operation to or from an airport in the contiguous United States by § 91.855, any person may apply for a special flight authorization for that airplane to operate in the contiguous United States for the purpose of obtaining modifications to meet Stage 3, Stage 4, or Stage 5 noise levels.

[Docket FAA-2015-3782, Amdt. 91-349, 82 FR 46132, Oct. 4, 2017]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 4, 2019

t0128

Order 

Clerk

February 4, 2019

156987 (24)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 156987

COA: 338479

Kent CC: 99-006332-FC

SAMUEL OZELL POWELL, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s October 2, 

2018 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
               ---------------------------------------------------


April 13, 2007

Board of Directors
Marshall Holdings International, Inc.
North Las Vegas, Nevada

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Form 10-KSB filed on
or about April 13, 2007 of the report dated April 10, 2007, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Marshall Holdings International, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2006, and to our inclusion as a named expert.  Our
report included an explanatory paragraph regarding  Marshall's ability to
continue as a going concern.


/s/  Madsen & Associates CPA's, Inc.

Madsen & Associates CPA's, Inc.
684 East Vine Street, #3
Murray, Utah 84107
#### § 73.85 Using agency.

For the purpose of this subpart, the using agency is the agency, organization or military command that established the requirements for the prohibited area.

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

Sections 73.87 through 73.99 are reserved for descriptions of designated prohibited areas. For Federal Register citations affecting these prohibited areas, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
#### § 33.4 Instructions for Continued Airworthiness.

The applicant must prepare Instructions for Continued Airworthiness in accordance with appendix A to this part that are acceptable to the Administrator. The instructions may be incomplete at type certification if a program exists to ensure their completion prior to delivery of the first aircraft with the engine installed, or upon issuance of a standard certificate of airworthiness for the aircraft with the engine installed, whichever occurs later.

[Amdt. 33-9, 45 FR 60181, Sept. 11, 1980]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      33,223,237
<SECURITIES>                                 5,163,127
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,657,155
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            48,512,727
<PP&E>                                       1,789,215
<DEPRECIATION>                                 678,449
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,430,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,966,462
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        89,714
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,374,707
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                58,430,883
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,063,860
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,266,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,129,840
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,797
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,335,782
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,974,239
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,361,543
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,361,543
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32


</TABLE>
#### PYRAMID RUBBER SPECIALITY CO v BAME

Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Summit Co.

No 1628.

Decided June 3, 1929

Naef & McIntosh, Akron, for Rubber Co.

Roetzel, Hunsicker & Olds, Akron, for Bame.

Syllabus by

FUNK, P. J.

The attempt, by a managing agent of a corporation to misrepresent or conceal the true condition of the affairs of the corporation or the value of its stock, from a stockholder who is not active in the management of the company business, for the purpose of purchasing his stock for less than its true value, is not such conduct as will justify a court in holding, as a matter of law, that its natural tendency would be to injure the business of such corporation and justify the peremptory discharge of such manager.

(Editor’s Note) This opinion will be published in full, in other Ohio Publications. For citations, watch the Omnibus Index.
**Exhibit
      32.2**











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Financial Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
      D. Cahill, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
                Michael D. CahillMichael
                D. CahillChief
                Financial Officer and SecretaryAugust
                10, 2005
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2009

l1019 

# Order

October 26, 2009

138393(56)

GERALDINE J. GLOD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 138393 COA: 279422 Macomb CC: 05-004973-NO CLINTON RIVER CRUISE COMPANY, INC., Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and

DSI INDUSTRIES, INC., d/b/a DOOR SOLUTIONS, and EVANGELICAL HOMES OF MICHIGAN, d/b/a PATHWAYS TRANSITION CARE, Defendants,
and

JANET YOUNG, Third-Party Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s June 23, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
#### § 102.167 Prior provision of rights with respect to debt.

To the extent that the rights of the debtor in relation to the same debt have been previously provided for under some other statutory or regulatory authority, the Agency is not required to duplicate those efforts before effecting administrative offset.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0098 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-039-AD

Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron Model 204B, 205A, 205A-1, 205B, 210, 212 

Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 152 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: To prevent failure of the inboard strap fitting.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $2,367 to replace a cracked fitting.

Labor per Helicopter

(40 work-hours x 

$85/work-hour for the

inspection)

$3,400

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $5,767, assuming a fitting needs to be replaced.

Total US Fleet Cost $876,584

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engine
# EUR-Lex - 31996D0619 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996D0619

**96/619/EC: Commission Decision of 16 October 1996 amending Decision 95/233/EC drawing up lists of third countries from which the Member States authorize imports of live poultry and hatching eggs (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 276 , 29/10/1996 P. 0018 - 0018 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 16 October 1996 amending Decision 95/233/EC drawing up lists of third countries from which the Member States authorize imports of live poultry and hatching eggs (Text with EEA relevance) (96/619/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/539/EEC of 15 October 1990 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in and imports from third countries of, poultry and hatching eggs (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Articles 21 and 26 thereof,

Whereas Commission Decision 95/233/EC (2), established lists of third countries from which importation of live poultry and hatching eggs is authorized in principle;

Whereas further written assurances have been received from Kenya; whereas examination of these assurances has shown that this country satisfies the requirements of the Community;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Annex II to Decision 95/233/EC the following line is inserted in accordance with the alphabetic order of the ISO-code:

'KE: Kenya`.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 October 1996.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 303, 31. 10. 1990, p. 6.

(2) OJ No L 156, 7. 7. 1995, p. 76.
#### SOUTHERN BELL TEL. & TEL. CO. v. LEAK.

(Decided November 25, 1915.)

Appeal from Birmingham City Court.

Heard before Hon. John H. Miller.

Stokely, Scrivner & Dominick, for appellant. John W. Altman, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed by agreement.
#### Marie Z. Hornkohl, Appellant, *v.*Board of Education of the City of New York et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 25, 1937;

decided March 2, 1937.

*Arthur C. Mandel*for motion.

*Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel (Paxton Blair*and *Arthur Bainbridge Hoff*of counsel), opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements, on the ground the order is not final.
### C OE N COMPANY, IN C.

November 3, 2009 Hatch tl . 1

Gateway View Plaza 1600 West Carson Street Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Attention: Subject:
Dear Gary, Mr. Gary Rohekar 

### H332571-TR-00001-CA01 - H-332571 -United States Steel- MINNTAC

- Line No. 7 NOx Reduction Pilot Study Coen Kiln Burner Offer 200901-11144- Rev A
As we have indicated the kiln burner that we propose to supply for the above referenced project will not produce more CO as compared with that is being produced by the existing burner. The reason is: CO Is formed from lack of fast mixing of CO and oxidant 

### (02) and chemical l<inetics of the reaction that is highly dependent on temperature and 

### 0 2 concentration. Coen multi-fuel burner is being designed for higher stoichiometric air (1.00) as compared with the existing burner which has stoichiometric air of about 

### 0.3 only. Hence Coen burner design promotes higher amount of premixing of 

### 02 (oxidant) with fuel to reduce CO production . The flame temperature in both cases is high enough so the oxidation of CO in not kinetically limited. So the new burner design is not kinetic limited for CO oxidation and the increased premixing in the primary zone will reduce CO emissions. We hope that in the above we have explained the design feature to minimize CO production. Very truly yours, 

### COEN COMPANY, INCORPORATED

# ldrltbd~ • • B.K. Waclhwani Product 

### Manager Energy Systems Group 

# TODD" Comllustlon

Coe n Com pany, I nc. • 1 00 Foste r C ity Blvd . • Foster C ity, CA 944 04 U SA • Te l: 1 (650 ) 638 -03 65 • Fax: 1 (5 30) 638 -0 355 • www . co en .co m