alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Rural Housing Service 

# AGENCY:

Rural Housing Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Correction. 

# SUMMARY:

The Rural Housing Service (RHS) corrects a notice published March 17, 2000 (65 FR 14525). This action is taken to correct the definition of “low-income community”. 

Accordingly, the notice published March 17, 2000 (65 FR 14525), is corrected as follows: 

                        On page 14525 in the third column under “Definitions for RCDI Purposes”, the definition for “Low-income community” should read “                        *Low-income community*                        —a city, town, village, county, parish, borough, or federally recognized Indian tribe with a median household income at, or below, 80 percent of the statewide median household income.”                     

Dated: April 26, 2000. 

Inga Smulkstys, 

Acting Under Secretary, Rural Development. 

[FR Doc. 00-11053 Filed 5-2-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-XV-P
# PR Field Notes

1

1

# image1.jpeg
#### §§ 91.907-91.999 [Reserved]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

P. O. Box 2815 

Sacramento, California 95812 

February 9, 2011 

ARB Staff Rule Review Results 

To: Mr. Sam Longmire, 

 Air Pollution Control Specialist III 

Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District 

Telephone Number: (530) 274-9306, ext. 106 

e-mail: sam@myairdistrict.com 

From: Alex Krichevsky, (916) 324-6222 

e-mail: akrichev@arb.ca.gov 

The following rule, which is scheduled for a public hearing to be held by your District 

Board in April, 2011, was received by us on January 14, 2011, for our review: 

Rule 214 Phase I Vapor Recovery Requirements 

The Air Resources Board staff has reviewed the rule and, based on the information 

available to us at this time, we have no comments. 

The rules were examined by the Enforcement Division and by the Monitoring and 

Laboratory Division. 

If you have any questions, please contact me by e-mail or at the telephone number 

above.
§ 63.12 Offenses involving alcohol or drugs. ( a ) A conviction for the violation of any Federal or state statute relating to the growing, processing, manufacture, sale, disposition, possession, transportation, or importation of narcotic drugs, marihuana, or depressant or stimulant drugs or substances is grounds for— ( 1 ) Denial of an application for any certificate or rating issued under this part for a period of up to 1 year after the date of final conviction; or
( 2 ) Suspension or revocation of any certificate or rating issued under this part.
( b ) The commission of an act prohibited by § 91.17(a) or § 91.19(a) of this chapter is grounds for— ( 1 ) Denial of an application for a certificate or rating issued under this part for a period of up to 1 year after the date of that act; or
( 2 ) Suspension or revocation of any certificate or rating issued under this part.
[Doc. No. 21956, 50 FR 15379, Apr. 17, 1985, as amended by Amdt. 63-27, 54 FR 34330, Aug. 18, 1989]
#### § 374a.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to issue rules pursuant to the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, in accordance with the Department's responsibility thereunder.

[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15939, Apr. 16, 2019]
### Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(r eleased the week prior to October 6, 2020 

### )

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES :



### None Available

The above

- listed memorandum opinions c an be viewed online through the

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebra ska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/

.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

http s ://www.nebraska.gov/courts/s c ca les/

.
#### § 91.1707 Training program hours.

(a) Ground instruction hours are listed in the following table:

| Initial/transition | Requalification | Recurrent |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20 hours | 12 hours | 8 hours. |

(b) Flight instruction hours are listed in the following table:

| Initial/transition | Requalification | Recurrent |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 12 hours with a minimum of 6 hours at level E | 8 hours level C or level E | 4 hours at level E, or 6 hours at level C. |

(c) Differences training hours are listed in the following table:

| 2 factory type design models concurrently | 1.5 hours required at level B. |
| --- | --- |
| More than 2 factory type design models concurrently | 3 hours at level B. |
| Each additional factory type design model added separately | 1.5 hours at level B. |

(d) Definitions of levels of training as used in this subpart:

(1) LEVEL A Training—Training that is conducted through self-instruction by the pilot.

(2) LEVEL B Training—Training that is conducted in the classroom environment with the aid of a qualified instructor who meets the requirements of this subpart.

(3) LEVEL C Training—Training that is accomplished in an FAA-approved Level 5 or 6 flight training device. In addition to the basic FTD requirements, the FTD must be representative of the MU-2B cockpit controls and be specifically approved by the FAA for the MU-2B airplane.

(4) Level E Training—Training that must be accomplished in the MU-2B airplane, Level C simulator, or Level D simulator.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general
partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ LEO F. WELLS, III  
| |  | Leo F. Wells, III      
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | November 7, 2008       



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
| |  | Douglas P. Williams    
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | November 7, 2008
§ 420.31 Agreements. ( a ) Except as provided by paragraph (c) of this section, an applicant shall complete an agreement with the local U.S. Coast Guard district to establish procedures for the issuance of a Notice to Mariners prior to a launch and other such measures as the Coast Guard deems necessary to protect public health and safety.
( b ) Except as provided by paragraph (c) of this section, an applicant shall complete an agreement with the FAA Air Traffic Control (ATC) office having jurisdiction over the airspace through which launches will take place, to establish procedures for the issuance of a Notice to Airmen prior to a launch and for closing of air routes during the launch window and other such measures as the FAA ATC office deems necessary to protect public health and safety.
( c ) An applicant that plans to operate a launch site located on a federal launch range does not have to comply with section 420.31 if the applicant is using existing federal launch range agreements with the U.S. Coast Guard and the FAA ATC office having jurisdiction over the airspace through which launches will take place.
Exhibit 21.1
 
 COLUMBUS McKINNON CORPORATION
 
 SUBSIDIARIES
 (as of March 31, 2009)
 
 
 CM Insurance Company, Inc. (US-NY)
 Columbus McKinnon de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
 Columbus McKinnon de Uruguay, S.A. (Uruguay)
 Columbus McKinnon do Brazil Ltda. (Brazil)
 Columbus McKinnon de Panama S.A. (Panama)
 Crane Equipment & Service, Inc. (US-OK)
 Société d’Exploitation des Raccords Gautier (France)
 Yale Industrial Products, Inc. (US-DE)
 Egyptian-American Crane Co. (40% Joint Venture) (Egypt)
 Audubon Europe S.a.r.l. (Luxembourg)
 Columbus McKinnon Limited (Canada)
 Yale Industrial Products Ltd. (England)
 Yale Industrial Products GmbH (Germany)
 Columbus McKinnon Asia Pacific Ltd. (Hong Kong)
 Hangzhou LILA Lifting and Lashing Co. Ltd. (China)
 Columbus McKinnon Hangzhou Industrial Co. Ltd. (China)
 Columbus McKinnon Corporation Ltd. (England)
 Columbus McKinnon France S.a.r.l. (France)
 Columbus McKinnon Italia S.r.l. (Italy)
 Yale Elevación Ibérica S.L. (Spain)
 Yale Industrial Products Asia (Thailand) Co. Ltd.
 Yale Industrial Products B.V. (The Netherlands)
 Columbus McKinnon PTY, LTD (South Africa)
 Yale Lifting & Mining Products (Pty.) Ltd. (25% Financial Interest) (South Africa)
 Yale Engineering Products Pty. Ltd. (South Africa)
 Yale Industrial Products GmbH (Austria)
 Columbus McKinnon Hungary Kft. (Hungary)
 Pfaff Beteiligungs GmbH (Germany)
 Pfaff Silberblau Hebezeugfabrik GmbH (Germany)
 Alltec Antriebstechnik GmbH (Germany)
 Dreier Transportgerate Lager-u. Betriebseinr GmbH (Germany)
 Pfaff Silberblau Winden & Hebezuege GesmbH (Austria)
 Pfaff Silberblau Benelux B.V (Netherlands)
 Pfaff Silberblau Polska SP.z.o.o (Poland)
 Pfaff Silberblau LTD, UK (England)
 Pfaff Silberblau Hungaria Csorlok es Emeloszkozok KFT (Hungary)
 Pfaff Silberblau Hebezeuge und Antriebstechnik AG (Switzerland)
 Verkehrstechnik Beteiligungs Gmbh (Germany)
 Verkehrstechnik Gmbh & Co. KG (Germany)
#### §§ 91.879-91.880 [Reserved]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Onion Mountain quadrangle,Oregon : 7.5-minute series (topographic)**
 
2012 | 2014 | 2015 | 2017
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28/6:42123-D 5/
Item Number:0080-G-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000932647
 
January 31, 2018
§ 61.155 Aeronautical knowledge. ( a ) *General.* The knowledge test for an airline transport pilot certificate is based on the aeronautical knowledge areas listed in paragraph (c) of this section that are appropriate to the aircraft category and class rating sought.
( b ) *Aircraft type rating.* A person who is applying for an additional aircraft type rating to be added to an airline transport pilot certificate is not required to pass a knowledge test if that person's airline transport pilot certificate lists the aircraft category and class rating that is appropriate to the type rating sought.
( c ) *Aeronautical knowledge areas.* ( 1 ) Applicable Federal Aviation Regulations of this chapter that relate to airline transport pilot privileges, limitations, and flight operations;
( 2 ) Meteorology, including knowledge of and effects of fronts, frontal characteristics, cloud formations, icing, and upper-air data;
( 3 ) General system of weather and NOTAM collection, dissemination, interpretation, and use;
( 4 ) Interpretation and use of weather charts, maps, forecasts, sequence reports, abbreviations, and symbols;
( 5 ) National Weather Service functions as they pertain to operations in the National Airspace System;
( 6 ) Windshear and microburst awareness, identification, and avoidance;
( 7 ) Principles of air navigation under instrument meteorological conditions in the National Airspace System;
( 8 ) Air traffic control procedures and pilot responsibilities as they relate to en route operations, terminal area and radar operations, and instrument departure and approach procedures;
( 9 ) Aircraft loading, weight and balance, use of charts, graphs, tables, formulas, and computations, and their effect on aircraft performance;
( 10 ) Aerodynamics relating to an aircraft's flight characteristics and performance in normal and abnormal flight regimes;
( 11 ) Human factors;
( 12 ) Aeronautical decision making and judgment;
( 13 ) Crew resource management to include crew communication and coordination; and
( 14 ) For an airline transport pilot certificate with an airplane category multiengine class rating or an airline transport pilot certificate obtained concurrently with a multiengine airplane type rating, the content of the airline transport pilot certification training program in § 61.156.
[Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16298, Apr. 4, 1997, as amended by Amdt. 61-130, 78 FR 42374, July 15, 2013; Amdt. 61-130C, 81 FR 2, Jan. 4, 2016; Amdt. 61-149, 86 FR 62087, Nov. 9, 2021]
Exhibit 21.1


COLUMBUS McKINNON CORPORATION
 
 SUBSIDIARIES
 (as of March 31, 2010)
 
  CM Insurance Company, Inc. (US-NY)
 Columbus McKinnon de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
 Columbus McKinnon de Uruguay, S.A. (Uruguay)
 Columbus McKinnon do Brazil Ltda. (Brazil)
 Columbus McKinnon de Panama S.A. (Panama)
 Crane Equipment & Service, Inc. (US-OK)
 Société d’Exploitation des Raccords Gautier (France)
 Yale Industrial Products, Inc. (US-DE)
 Egyptian-American Crane Co. (40% Joint Venture) (Egypt)
 Audubon Europe S.a.r.l. (Luxembourg)
 Columbus McKinnon Limited (Canada)
 Yale Industrial Products Ltd. (England)
 Yale Industrial Products GmbH (Germany)
 Columbus McKinnon Asia Pacific Ltd. (Hong Kong)
 Hangzhou LILA Lifting and Lashing Co. Ltd. (China)
 Columbus McKinnon Hangzhou Industrial Co. Ltd. (China)
 Columbus McKinnon Corporation Ltd. (England)
 Columbus McKinnon France S.a.r.l. (France)
 Columbus McKinnon Italia S.r.l. (Italy)
 Yale Elevación Ibérica S.L. (Spain)
 Yale Industrial Products Asia (Thailand) Co. Ltd.
 Yale Industrial Products B.V. (The Netherlands)
 Columbus McKinnon PTY, LTD (South Africa)
 Yale Lifting & Mining Products (Pty.) Ltd. (25% Financial Interest) (South Africa)
 Yale Engineering Products Pty. Ltd. (South Africa)
 Yale Industrial Products GmbH (Austria)
 Columbus McKinnon Hungary Kft. (Hungary)
 Pfaff Beteiligungs GmbH (Germany)
 Pfaff Silberblau Hebezeugfabrik GmbH (Germany)
 Alltec Antriebstechnik GmbH (Germany)
 Dreier Transportgerate Lager-u. Betriebseinr GmbH (Germany)
 Pfaff Silberblau Winden & Hebezuege GesmbH (Austria)
 Pfaff Silberblau Benelux B.V (Netherlands)
 Pfaff Silberblau Polska SP.z.o.o (Poland)
 Pfaff Silberblau LTD, UK (England)
 Pfaff Silberblau Hungaria Csorlok es Emeloszkozok KFT (Hungary)
 Pfaff Silberblau Hebezeuge und Antriebstechnik AG (Switzerland)
 Verkehrstechnik Beteiligungs Gmbh (Germany)
 Verkehrstechnik Gmbh & Co. KG (Germany)
[ARTICLE] 5
[CIK] 0001072293
[NAME] ALLSTATES WORLDCARGO, INC.
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   6-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          SEP-30-2000
[PERIOD-END]                               MAR-31-2000
[CASH]                                         412,179
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                4,193,912
[ALLOWANCES]                                   303,928
[INVENTORY]                                     41,207
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                             4,672,773
[PP&E]                                       1,565,997
[DEPRECIATION]                                 884,467
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                               6,085,437
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                        4,006,586
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                         3,251
[OTHER-SE]                                   (547,773)
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                 6,085,437
[SALES]                                     15,100,052
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                            15,100,052
[CGS]                                        9,168,203
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                6,050,052
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                               (2,960)
[LOSS-PROVISION]                               (6,343)
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                              98,574
[INCOME-PRETAX]                              (226,080)
[INCOME-TAX]                                    20,464
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                          (246,544)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                 (246,544)
[EPS-BASIC]                                      (.01)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                    (.01)
</TABLE>
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 0 9

- 3 0 7 7 5 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. M A R K H O L P E R , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e M i d d l e D i s t r i c t o f L o u i s i a n a U S D C N o
. 3 : 0 8

- C R

- 1 4 2

- 1

B e f o r e S M I T H , P R A D O , a n d H A Y N E S , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e a t t o r n e y a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t M a r k H o l p e r h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o

w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f

i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. H o l p e r h a s f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d ,
c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f , a n d H o l p e r ’ s r e s p o n s e d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s

e x c u s e d f

r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 20 , 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-30775 Document: 00511085803 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010
§ 29.1189 Shutoff means. ( a ) There must be means to shut off or otherwise prevent hazardous quantities of fuel, oil, de-icing fluid, and other flammable fluids from flowing into, within, or through any designated fire zone, except that this means need not be provided— ( 1 ) For lines, fittings, and components forming an integral part of an engine;
( 2 ) For oil systems for turbine engine installations in which all components of the system, including oil tanks, are fireproof or located in areas not subject to engine fire conditions; or
( 3 ) For engine oil systems in category B rotorcraft using reciprocating engines of less than 500 cubic inches displacement.
( b ) The closing of any fuel shutoff valve for any engine may not make fuel unavailable to the remaining engines.
( c ) For category A rotorcraft, no hazardous quantity of flammable fluid may drain into any designated fire zone after shutoff has been accomplished, nor may the closing of any fuel shutoff valve for an engine make fuel unavailable to the remaining engines.
( d ) The operation of any shutoff may not interfere with the later emergency operation of any other equipment, such as the means for declutching the engine from the rotor drive.
( e ) Each shutoff valve and its control must be designed, located, and protected to function properly under any condition likely to result from fire in a designated fire zone.
( f ) Except for ground-use-only auxiliary power unit installations, there must be means to prevent inadvertent operation of each shutoff and to make it possible to reopen it in flight after it has been closed.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-12, 41 FR 55473, Dec. 20, 1976; Amdt. 29-22, 49 FR 6850, Feb. 23, 1984; Amdt. 29-26, 53 FR 34219, Sept. 2, 1988]
§ 102.36 Disqualification and unavailability of Administrative Law Judges. ( a ) An Administrative Law Judge may withdraw from a proceeding because of a personal bias or for other disqualifying reasons. Any party may request the Administrative Law Judge, at any time following the Judge's designation and before filing of the Judge's decision, to withdraw on grounds of personal bias or disqualification, by filing with the Judge promptly upon the discovery of the alleged facts a timely affidavit setting forth in detail the matters alleged to constitute grounds for disqualification. If, in the Administrative Law Judge's opinion, the affidavit is filed with due diligence and is sufficient on its face, the Judge will promptly disqualify himself/herself and withdraw from the proceeding. If the Administrative Law Judge does not disqualify himself/herself and withdraw from the proceeding, the Judge must rule upon the record, stating the grounds for that ruling, and proceed with the hearing, or, if the hearing has closed, the Judge will proceed with issuance of the decision, and the provisions of § 102.26, with respect to review of rulings of Administrative Law Judges, will apply.
( b ) If the Administrative Law Judge designated to conduct the hearing becomes unavailable to the Board after the hearing has been opened, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, Deputy Chief Administrative Law Judge, or an Associate Chief Administrative Law Judge, as the case may be, may designate another Administrative Law Judge for the purpose of further hearing or other appropriate action.