SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO . A

- 0657

- 16T3

KEITH P. SEQUEIRA,

Plaintiff

- A ppellant,

v.

PRU DENTIAL EQUITY GROUP, LLC; PRUDENTIAL REAL ESTATE AFFILIATES, INC.; RICHARD HORTON III, WACHOVIA SECURITIES, LLC; WILLIAM H. GOECKELER; LAURA HAK; THOMAS F. DALY, BRIAN BEGLEY; KENNETH PARDUE; ROBERT E. MO RR ISSEY, JR.; ANTHONY MCQUEEN; BRAND MEYER; DAVID J. KOWACH; DANIEL LUDEMAN; DAVID MONDAY; JAMES E. HAYS; E. KENNEDY THOMPSON; DAVID CARROLL; MI C HAEL J. CARROLL; MARGE CONNOLLY; TERESA RODDY; JOHN PUZIO; and PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Defendants

- Respondents.

__________________________________

Argued t elephonically June 8, 2018

– Decided June 21, 2018
Before Judges Reisner and Mayer.
On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Monmouth County, Docket No. L

0179

- 08. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court
. " A lthough it is posted on the internet , this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited
. R. 1:36

- 3.2 A

- 0657

- 16T3 Keith P. Sequeira, appellant , argued the cause pro se. Kimberly Lunetta argued the cause for respondents Prudential Equity Group, LLC; Prudential Real Estate Affiliates, Inc; and Prudential Financial Inc. (Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, attorneys; Michelle S. Silverman and Nitin Sharma, on the b rief).
Rosemary S. Gousman argued the cause for Wachovia Securities, LLC, and all Wachovia individuals in their capacity as employee supervisors (Fisher & Phillips, LLP, attorneys; Rosemary S. Go usman, on the brief).

PER CURIAM
Plaintiff Keith Sequeira appeals from a September 2, 2 0 16

order , denying his motion to reopen previous trial court orders

entered in his Law Against Discrimination (LAD) litigation. We

affirm.
This appeal is the latest in a series of lawsuits and appeals
filed by p laintiff agains t his former employers. In 2014, we affirmed the summary judgment dismissal of plaintiff's 2008 LAD
complaint concerning events that occurred while he was employed
by Prudential Securities, Inc. and Wachovia Securities LLC.
Sequeira v. Prudential Eq uity Grp . LLC , No. A

- 0734

- 10 (App. Div.
Oct. 9, 2014), certif. denied , 222 N.J. 17 (2015) ( Sequeira I ).

In 2012 , plaintiff filed another complaint ( Sequei ra II ), raising
many of the same issues raised in Sequeira I . The trial court
dismissed that litigation, including plaintiff's claims of3 A

- 0657

- 16T3

fraudulent concealment of evidence. We affirmed the trial court's

orders. 1 Sequeira v. Wells Fargo & Co. , No. A

- 3239

- 13 (App. Div.
Feb. 24, 2016).
On April 15, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion in the trial
court, seeking to vacate all of the prior trial court orders and
reinstate his 2008 and 2012 complaints. Plaintiff styled the

motion as one under Rule 4:50

- 1(c), claiming that defendants

obtained al l of the prior judgments by "false swearing." Judge
Joseph P. Quinn granted summary judgment denying the motion, for
reasons stated in a detailed written opinion.
On this appeal, plaintiff contends that Judge Quinn's

decision was "an abuse of discretion " ; defendants committed "legal
fraud" and "lied" in their previous summary judgment submissions;
and the trial court's previous factual findings and legal
conclusions "were belied by the record." We affirm for the reasons
stated in Judge Quinn's opinion.
We add only these comments. As Judge Quinn recognized, this
appeal is an attempt to reargue the merits of the previous summary
judgment motions as well as the previous appeals. Further,

p laintiff's Rule 4:50

- 1(c) motion was filed years beyond the one

year time limit set forth in Rule 4:50

- 2. Plaintiff's appellate

1 We vacated a counsel fee award against plaintiff. However, that aspect of our opinion is not relevant here.4 A

- 0657

- 16T3

arguments are without sufficient merit to warrant further

discussion. R. 2:11

- 3(e)(1)(E).

Affirmed.