alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Andy Buxton, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 253 C.D. 2020

:

Office of Attorney General, :

Respondent :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, December 2, 2020

, upon consideration of P etitioner’s

application for re consideration /reargument

, and R espondent’ s answer in

response thereto, the application is denied.
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 20, 2011                                                                 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                               |
| /s/ Alton L. Boynton                                                               |
|                                                                               |
| Name: Alton L. Boynton                                                        |
| Title:  President and Chief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer |
| Principal Financial and Accounting Officer                                         |

----
[Nos. 20477-4-III; 20478-2-III.

Division Three.

November 14, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Kimberly K. Stinebaugh, *Appellant.*The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. John Vernon Grigsby, *Appellant.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Benton County, Nos. 00-1-00641-5 and 00-1-00636-9, Carolyn A. Brown, J., entered August 24, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, J., concurred in by Kato, A.C.J., and Sweeney, J.
<PAGE>

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
REGARDING FORM 10-K FOR YEAR ENDING
DECEMBER 31, 2002

EXHIBIT 99.1

         I, Nello Gonfiantini III, Chairman of the Board, President and
Secretary of Specialty Trust, Inc. (the Company), hereby state, certify and
attest in this written statement that:

         (a)      The annual report of the Company filed on form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b)      The information contained in such annual report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

         This Certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.

/s/ Nello Gonfiantini III                      Dated this 15th day of March 2003
----------------------------------
Name:   Nello Gonfiantini III
Title : Chairman of the Board, President
        and Secretary

                                       92
ex10_5.htm


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    EXHIBIT
10.5

     

    LETTER
OF REAFFIRMATION OF ABSOLUTE ASSIGNMENT OF FRANCHISEE NOTES AND PROCEEDS DUE,
ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND SUBLEASES, PLEDGE AGREEMENT, AND UNITED STATES TRADEMARK
COLLATERAL ASSIGNMENT AND SECURITY AGREEMENT

    


    DATED: As
of November 11, 2009

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              TO:

            	
              Manufacturers
      and Traders Trust Company

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              One
      M & T Plaza, Buffalo, New York
14240

            


    

    


    Re:                      REAFFIRMATION of ABSOLUTE ASSIGNMENT
OF FRANCHISEE NOTES AND PROCEEDS DUE, ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND SUBLEASES, PLEDGE
AGREEMENT, AND UNITED STATES TRADEMARK COLLATERAL ASSIGNMENT AND SECURITY
AGREEMENT (collectively, the "Security Documents") made to MANUFACTURERS AND
TRADERS TRUST COMPANY (the “Bank") dated as of August 7,
2007 in connection with loans made to EMERGING VISION, INC. (“Borrower”) by
Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (collectively, the
“Loan”).

    


    Dear
Sirs:

    


    Each of
the undersigned hereby reaffirms and ratifies all the terms, conditions,
representations, and covenants contained in the Security Documents and certifies
that there are no defenses, offsets, or counterclaims thereto as of the date
hereof.

    


    Each of
the undersigned further covenants and agrees (i) that the security interests
granted to Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company by the Security Documents and
respectively as appropriate perfected by subsequent UCC-1 filings, remain in
full force and effect as set forth therein and that same continue to constitute
a binding first security interest in the stated assets of each of the
undersigned securing the Borrower’s and each of the undersigned’s debt to
Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company and that they are unaffected by the
execution of that certain ALLONGE TO NOTE and that certain LIMITED WAIVER AND
AMENDMENT AGREEMENT evidencing, among other things, (i) the reduction of the
Principal amount of the Loan as set forth therein and (ii) the waiver of certain
financial covenants for fiscal period ended 9/30/09, and any related documents,
each dated of even date herewith, copies of which each of the undersigned
acknowledges having received and reviewed, and (ii) that the Security Documents
are in full force and effect.

     

    Very
truly yours,

    


    EMERGING
VISION, INC.

    


    By:           /s/ Christopher G.
Payan

    Christopher G. Payan, CEO

     

    


    OG
ACQUISITION, INC.

    


    By:           /s/ Brian P.
Alessi

    Name: Brian P. Alessi

    Title: Chief Financial
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY  REPORT  ON FORM  10-QSB  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          423
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        1,401
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       84,888
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         81,801
<LOANS>                                      55,508
<ALLOWANCE>                                     425
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              151,105
<DEPOSITS>                                   74,300
<SHORT-TERM>                                  1,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           3,432
<LONG-TERM>                                  47,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        345
<OTHER-SE>                                   24,528
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              151,105
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               1,025
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             1,470
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 66
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              2,561
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              815
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,487
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         1,074
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 495
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      495
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    283
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .09
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 2.97
<LOANS-NON>                                       0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     21
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                425
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     0
<RECOVERIES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               425
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           0



</TABLE>
#### § 25.779 Motion and effect of cockpit controls.

Cockpit controls must be designed so that they operate in accordance with the following movement and actuation:

(a) Aerodynamic controls:

(1) *Primary.*

| Controls | Motion and effect |
| --- | --- |
| Aileron | Right (clockwise) for right wing down. |
| Elevator | Rearward for nose up. |
| Rudder | Right pedal forward for nose right. |

(2) *Secondary.*

| Controls | Motion and effect |
| --- | --- |
| Flaps (or auxiliary lift devices) | Forward for flaps up; rearward for flaps down. |
| Trim tabs (or equivalent) | Rotate to produce similar rotation of the airplane about an axis parallel to the axis of the control. |

(b) Powerplant and auxiliary controls:

(1) *Powerplant.*

| Controls | Motion and effect |
| --- | --- |
| Power or thrust | Forward to increase forward thrust and rearward to increase rearward thrust. |
| Propellers | Forward to increase rpm. |
| Mixture | Forward or upward for rich. |
| Carburetor air heat | Forward or upward for cold. |
| Supercharger | Forward or upward for low blower. For turbosuperchargers, forward, upward, or clockwise, to increase pressure. |

(2) *Auxiliary.*

| Controls | Motion and effect |
| --- | --- |
| Landing gear | Down to extend. |

[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-72, 55 FR 29778, July 20, 1990]
EXHIBIT 32.1 -- CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER OF FIRST CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL, INC., PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SECTION 1350 OF 18 U.S.C. 63.


I, Alex Genin, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of
First  Capital  International,  Inc.  hereby  certify  that  First  Capital
International, Inc.'s periodic report on Form 10QSB and the financial statements
contained therein fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  (15  U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d) and that
information  contained  in  the  periodic report on Form 10QSB and the financial
statements  contained  therein  fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial  condition  and  results  of  the  operations  of  First  Capital
International,  Inc.


Date: May 12, 2006          /s/ Alex Genin
                            Chief Executive Officer and
                            Acting Chief Financial Officer
Searched for **http://www.bea.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.bea.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6170

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SHERITHA J. BELLAMY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior 

District Judge. (2:12-cr-00062-RGD-DEM-1; 2:13-cv-00498-RGD)

Submitted: June 4, 2014 Decided: June 9, 2014

Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sheritha J. Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Anders 

George, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sheritha J. Bellamy seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and her 

motion for an amended restitution order. The order is not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Bellamy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to Section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on March 21, 2000, Lifepoint, Inc., 10410 Trademark Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for the registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed below: Drug
ScheduleTetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
IAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethamphetamine (1105)
IIPhencyclidine (7471)
IIBenzoylecgonine (9180)
IIMorphine (9300)
II
 The firm plans to use gram quantities of the listed controlled substances to manufacture drug abuse test kits. Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration. Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than July 11, 2000. Dated: April 21, 2000. John H. King, Deputy Assistant Administrator Office of Diversion Control Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 00-11888 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
#### § 102.23 Amendment.

The Respondent may amend its answer at any time prior to the hearing. During the hearing or subsequently, the Respondent may amend the answer in any case where the complaint has been amended, within such period as may be fixed by the Administrative Law Judge or the Board. Whether or not the complaint has been amended, the answer may, in the discretion of the Administrative Law Judge or the Board, upon motion, be amended upon such terms and within such periods as may be fixed by the Administrative Law Judge or the Board.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Reported historic asbestosmines, historic asbestos prospects, and other natural occurrences of asbestosin California**
 
Map | Pamphlet
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.76:2011-1188
Item Number: 0624-H(online)
CGP systemNumber:000932524
 
January 26, 2018
§ 1208.1 General provisions. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to set forth the regulations of the NMB regarding the availability and disclosure of information in its possession and to implement the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). These regulations establish procedures for requesting access to records maintained by the NMB and should be read together with the FOIA, the 1987 Office of Management and Budget Guidelines for FOIA Fees, Executive Order 12,600, and the NMB's other rules and regulations.
( b ) Public policy and the successful effectuation of the NMB's mission require that Board members and the employees of the NMB maintain a reputation for impartiality and integrity. Labor and management and other interested parties participating in mediation efforts must have assurance, as must labor organizations, carriers, and individuals involved in questions of representation, that confidential information disclosed to Board members and employees of the NMB will not be divulged, voluntarily or by compulsion.
( c ) Notwithstanding this general policy, the Board will under all circumstances endeavor to make public as much information as can be allowed. The Board will withhold information under the FOIA only if it reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an interest protected by one of the exemptions described in the FOIA or when disclosure is prohibited by law. When full disclosure is not possible, the NMB will consider whether partial disclosure of information is possible and will take necessary steps to segregate and release nonexempt information.
( d ) The NMB will preserve all correspondence pertaining to requests it receives under the FOIA, as well as copies of all requested records, until disposition or destruction is authorized pursuant to Title 44 of the United States Code or the General Records Schedule 14 of the National Archives and Records Administration. The NMB will not dispose of or destroy records while they are the subject of a pending request, appeal, or lawsuit under the FOIA.
#### In the Matter of Robert J. Rooney, Respondent, against William G. Rice et al., Constituting the New York State Civil Service Commission, Respondents; James C. Quinn et al., Constituting the New York City Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Appellants, and Louis Fisher et al., Interveners, Appellants, Impleaded with Another.

Submitted March 15, 1937;

decided March 16, 1937.

*Emanuel Thebner*for motion.

*James C. Quinn, Albert de Roode*and *William I. Cohen*opposed.

*601Motion to dismiss appeal of James C. Quinn, chairman and others, constituting the New York City Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, denied, with ten dollars costs.

Motion to dismiss appeal of Louis Fisher and another, interveners, granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion, unless said appellants file and serve undertaking on appeal and pay ten dollars costs within ten days, in which event the motion is denied.
§ 297.25 Cancellation or conditioning of registration. The registration of a foreign indirect air carrier may be canceled or subjected to additional terms, conditions or limitations if: ( a ) It files with the Department a written notice that it is discontinuing foreign indirect air carrier activities;
( b ) It fails to perform air transportation services as authorized;
( c ) It fails to file the reports required by this part;
( d ) A substantial ownership or control interest is acquired by persons who are not citizens of the country of citizenship of the registrant;
( e ) There is a failure of effective reciprocity; or
( f ) The Department finds that it is in the public interest to do so.
[ER-1159, 44 FR 69635, Dec. 4, 1979, as amended by ER-1294, 47 FR 19685, May 7, 1982]
#### Anon.

A LEANT

January 1838.

Where a judgment rendered after verdict is affirmed by default in open court, the defendant in error is entitled to judgment that he recover twice the amount of his taxed bill of costs ; but he can claim no more than single costs where the judgment was rendered on a report of referees.

This was a writ of error brought. to reverse a judgment rendered by a court of common pleas on a report of referees. On the cause being called on the calendar, the defendant in error (the plaintiff below) appeared and took a default against the plaintiff in error, and moved for judgment of *affirmance*and for the costs allowed by statute on affirmance after verdict.

Per Curiam.

Where the judgment affirmed was ren dered *after verdict,*the statute authorizes the court in its discretion to give judgment that the defendant in error recover twice the amount of his taxed bill of costs, 2 R. S. 618, § 33 ; and where the plaintiff in error in such case *suffers a default*on the cause being called on the calendar, we have directed a rule to be entered accordingly. But a judgment on a report of referees is not within the terms of the statute, and statutes giving costs are always construed strictly. The motion cannot be granted.
###### Editorial Note on Part 47

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 47 appear at 75 FR 41979, July 20, 2010.

#### § 47.17 Fees.

(a) The fees for applications under this part are as follows:

| (1) Certificate of Aircraft Registration (each aircraft) | $5.00 |
| --- | --- |
| (2) Dealer's Aircraft Registration Certificate | 10.00 |
| (3) Additional Dealer's Aircraft Registration Certificate (issued to same dealer) | 2.00 |
| (4) Special registration number (each number) | 10.00 |
| (5) To change, reassign, or reserve a registration number | 10.00 |
| (6) Replacement Certificate of Aircraft Registration | 2.00 |
| (7) Renewal Certificate of Aircraft Registration | 5.00 |

(b) Each application must be accompanied by the proper fee, that may be paid by check or money order to the Federal Aviation Administration.

[Doc. No. 7190, 31 FR 4495, Mar. 17, 1966; 31 FR 5483, Apr. 7, 1966, as amended by Doc. No. 8084, 32 FR 5769, Apr. 11, 1967; Amdt. 47-29, 75 FR 41981, July 20, 2010; Amdt. No. 47-33, 87 FR 71217, Nov. 22, 2022]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

EX REL. ANTONIO BUNDY,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 65 EM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of July

, 2017, the Action in Mandamus is DENIED.