1

RAW DATA FOR THE ROUND ROBIN EVALUATION OF THE 

DISTANCE AND ADJACENT TEST SET-UPS:

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS:

Television Sets

Revised April 2013

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20585
2

This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Navigant Consulting Inc.
3

RAW DATA FOR THE ROUND ROBIN EVALUATION OF THE DISTANCE AND 

ADJACENT TEST SET-UPS

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Distance Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 1....................................4

Table 2: Distance Test Set-up Pon Representation Analysis for TV 1 .............................................5

Table 3: Adjacent Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 1 ...................................6

Table 4: Distance Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 2....................................7

Table 5: Distance Test Set-up Pon Representation Analysis for TV 2 .............................................8

Table 6: Adjacent Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 2 ...................................9

Table 7: Distance Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 3..................................10

Table 8: Distance Test Set-up Pon Representation Analysis for TV 3 ...........................................11

Table 9: Adjacent Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 3 .................................12

Table 10: Distance Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 4................................13

Table 11: Distance Test Set-up Pon Representation Analysis for TV 4 .........................................14

Table 12: Adjacent Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 4 ...............................15

Table 13: Distance Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 5................................16

Table 14: Distance Test Set-up Pon Representation Analysis for TV 5 .........................................17

Table 15: Adjacent Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 5 ...............................18

Table 16: Distance Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 6................................19

Table 17: Distance Test Set-up Pon Representation Analysis for TV 6 .........................................20

Table 18: Adjacent Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 6 ...............................21

Table 19: Distance Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 7................................22

Table 20: Distance Test Set-up Pon Representation Analysis for TV 7 .........................................23

Table 21: Adjacent Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 7 ...............................24

Table 22: Distance Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 8................................25

Table 23: Distance Test Set-up Pon Representation Analysis for TV 8 .........................................26

Table 24: Adjacent Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 8 ...............................27
4

RAW DATA FOR THE ROUND ROBIN EVALUATION OF THE DISTANCE AND 

ADJACENT TEST SET-UPS

Table 1: Distance Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 1

0 Lux 10 Lux 12 Lux 35 Lux 50 Lux 75 Lux 100 Lux 300 Lux

Lab A - Test 1 71.67 116.80 127.21 153.69 154.05 153.95 153.25 153.21

Lab A - Test 2 71.46 117.84 126.26 153.66 153.39 153.73 153.33 153.95

Lab A - Test 3 71.49 116.94 128.23 154.01 153.98 153.32 153.29 153.62

Lab B - Test 1 71.81 133.38 149.14 163.63 163.36 163.40 163.09

Lab B - Test 2 71.93 122.46 141.52 163.52 163.38 163.23 162.71

Lab B - Test 3 72.18 128.60 140.59 163.74 163.42 163.37 163.19

Lab C - Test 1 71.57 114.37 123.23 152.15 152.18 152.18 151.81 151.43

Lab C - Test 2 71.16 118.76 128.71 160.78 161.18 161.26 160.70 160.21

Lab C - Test 3 70.89 118.33 132.43 160.82 161.24 160.36 160.21 161.17

Lab D - Test 1 71.99 117.24 132.98 153.95 153.40 153.82 153.79

Lab D - Test 2 71.33 117.15 125.69 152.12 152.05 151.48 151.59

Lab D - Test 3 71.97 120.56 129.49 153.84 153.94 153.89 153.63

MEDIAN 71.62 118.09 129.10 153.98 154.02 153.84 153.86 153.87

MEAN 71.62 120.20 132.12 157.16 157.13 155.80 156.81 156.80

STD DEV 0.38 5.52 7.76 4.84 4.85 3.94 4.88 4.79

COV 0.53% 4.67% 6.01% 3.15% 3.15% 2.56% 3.17% 3.11%

MAX 72.18 133.38 149.14 163.74 163.42 161.26 163.40 163.19

MIN 70.89 114.37 123.23 152.12 152.05 152.18 151.48 151.43

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX)

1.79% 14.25% 17.37% 7.09% 6.96% 5.63% 7.30% 7.21%
5

Table 2: Pon Representation Analysis for TV 1 using the Distance Test Set-up 

Pon Mean of Pon UCL/1.05

Rep 

Rating

Lab A - Test 1 126.46

126.46 120.90 126.46

Lab A - Test 2 126.18

Lab A - Test 3 126.76

Lab B - Test 1 137.00

135.67 131.05 135.67

Lab B - Test 2 135.05

Lab B - Test 3 134.97

Lab C - Test 1 124.69

128.71 128.19 128.71

Lab C - Test 2 130.34

Lab C - Test 3 131.09

Lab D - Test 1 128.18

126.88 123.34 126.88

Lab D - Test 2 125.16

Lab D - Test 3 127.30

MEDIAN 127.74 127.79

MEAN 129.43 129.43

STD DEV 4.23 4.27

COV 3.27% 3.30%

MAX 137.00 135.67

MIN 124.69 126.46

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 8.98% 6.79%

Note:

The DOE SNOPR proposes that Pon is the equal weighting of power measurement (in watts) of 3, 

12, 35, and 100. The round robin testing was not performed at 3 lux, and therefore DOE 

calculated Pon using the equal weightings of power measurement (in watts) of 0, 12, 35, and 100 

from the round robin.

The SNOPR also proposes to use a IR/UV blocking filter but the Round Robin Testing was 

conducted prior to the IR/UV blocking filter investigation and therefore does not use this filter. 

DOE testing shows that an IR/UV block filter will reduce power measurements by 30% to 40%, 

and should also reduce variability. 

Finally, the SNOPR provides a sampling plan where a minimum of two units of a TV basic 

model must be tested for any value used for a representation rating. The representation rating is 

the higher of the sample mean and the UCL/1.05. The three tests at each lab are treated as tests 

of three basic models and used in the sampling plan calculation to determine the representation 

rating.
6

Table 3: Adjacent Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 1

0 Lux 10 Lux 12 Lux 35 Lux 50 Lux 75 Lux 100 Lux 300 Lux

Lab A - Test 1 71.72 154.67 154.34 153.66 153.59 154.11 153.56 153.44

Lab A - Test 2 71.33 154.22 153.51 154.05 153.69 153.61 153.44 153.96

Lab A - Test 3 71.36 154.54 153.70 154.20 153.78 154.00 153.99 153.98

Lab B - Test 1 71.96 163.82 163.71 163.51 163.25 163.44 163.22

Lab B - Test 2 71.59 158.89 162.97 163.00 163.13 163.10 162.98

Lab B - Test 3 71.93 163.97 163.52 163.32 161.48 161.48 162.37

Lab C - Test 1 71.46 162.66 161.68 161.10 161.91 161.59 161.07 160.81

Lab C - Test 2 71.02 161.08 88.44 161.00 161.18 161.24 160.41 160.16

Lab C - Test 3 71.09 148.55 148.06 161.72 161.06 161.33 160.54 160.26

Lab D - Test 1 71.89 154.12 154.28 154.19 154.04 154.12 153.55

Lab D - Test 2 71.77 153.96 153.97 153.66 154.01 153.96 153.86

Lab D - Test 3 71.28 152.10 151.81 151.67 151.91 151.90 151.61

MEDIAN 71.53 154.61 154.13 157.60 157.55 157.68 157.26 157.07

MEAN 71.53 156.88 150.83 157.92 157.75 157.65 157.58 157.52

STD DEV 0.32 5.04 20.32 4.66 4.52 4.10 4.40 4.44

COV 0.45% 3.26% 13.19% 2.95% 2.87% 2.60% 2.80% 2.83%

MAX 71.96 163.97 163.71 163.51 163.25 161.59 163.44 163.22

MIN 71.02 148.55 88.44 151.67 151.91 153.61 151.90 151.61

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 1.31% 9.40% 45.98% 7.24% 6.95% 4.94% 7.06% 7.11%
7

Table 4: Distance Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 2

0 Lux 10 Lux 12 Lux 35 Lux 50 Lux 75 Lux 100 Lux 300 Lux

Lab A - Test 1 64.35 70.13 72.40 112.03 126.52 126.50 126.00 125.74

Lab A - Test 2 64.97 69.49 72.53 111.56 126.20 126.28 125.68 125.28

Lab A - Test 3 64.95 69.53 71.74 113.80 124.96 126.02 128.11 127.72

Lab B - Test 1 64.90 73.55 78.87 116.04 127.56 127.00 126.65

Lab B - Test 2 64.68 73.26 74.86 116.04 127.41 126.96 126.83

Lab B - Test 3 64.64 74.76 77.16 117.60 127.81 127.32 127.13

Lab C - Test 1 64.81 69.91 79.74 113.00 127.29 126.63 126.31 126.25

Lab C - Test 2 64.69 70.80 74.68 119.36 127.13 126.21 126.09 126.06

Lab C - Test 3 64.73 69.24 72.31 114.28 127.24 126.55 126.36 126.22

Lab D - Test 1 65.06 70.50 75.11 112.42 125.39 124.64 124.32

Lab D - Test 2 65.05 69.72 75.42 113.34 125.61 125.11 124.81

Lab D - Test 3 65.10 70.52 73.59 112.07 125.33 125.18 124.71

MEDIAN 64.86 70.31 74.77 113.57 126.83 126.39 126.20 126.14

MEAN 64.83 70.95 74.87 114.30 126.54 126.37 126.23 125.98

STD DEV 0.22 1.84 2.61 2.46 1.00 0.23 1.01 1.04

COV 0.34% 2.62% 3.49% 2.17% 0.79% 0.18% 0.80% 0.83%

MAX 65.10 74.76 79.74 119.36 127.81 126.63 128.11 127.72

MIN 64.35 69.24 71.74 111.56 124.96 126.02 124.64 124.32

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 1.14% 7.38% 10.03% 6.53% 2.23% 0.48% 2.71% 2.67%
8

Table 5: Pon Representation Analysis for TV 2 using the Distance Test Set-up 

Pon Mean of Pon UCL/1.05

Rep 

Rating

Lab A - Test 1 93.70

94.01 90.42 94.01

Lab A - Test 2 93.69

Lab A - Test 3 94.65

Lab B - Test 1 96.70

96.34 92.73 96.34

Lab B - Test 2 95.64

Lab B - Test 3 96.68

Lab C - Test 1 95.97

95.53 92.54 95.53

Lab C - Test 2 96.21

Lab C - Test 3 94.42

Lab D - Test 1 94.31

94.34 90.45 94.34

Lab D - Test 2 94.73

Lab D - Test 3 93.99

MEDIAN 94.69 94.94

MEAN 95.05 95.05

STD DEV 1.13 1.08

COV 1.18% 1.13%

MAX 96.70 96.34

MIN 93.69 94.01

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 3.12% 2.42%

Note:

The DOE SNOPR proposes that Pon is the equal weighting of power measurement (in watts) of 3, 

12, 35, and 100. The round robin testing was not performed at 3 lux, and therefore DOE 

calculated Pon using the equal weightings of power measurement (in watts) of 0, 12, 35, and 100 

from the round robin.

The SNOPR also proposes to use a IR/UV blocking filter but the Round Robin Testing was 

conducted prior to the IR/UV blocking filter investigation and therefore does not use this filter. 

DOE testing shows that an IR/UV block filter will reduce power measurements by 30% to 40%, 

and should also reduce variability. 

Finally, the SNOPR provides a sampling plan where a minimum of two units of a TV basic 

model must be tested for any value used for a representation rating. The representation rating is 

the higher of the sample mean and the UCL/1.05. The three tests at each lab are treated as tests 

of three basic models and used in the sampling plan calculation to determine the representation 

rating.
9

Table 6: Adjacent Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 2

0 Lux 10 Lux 12 Lux 35 Lux 50 Lux 75 Lux 100 Lux 300 Lux

Lab A - Test 1 64.60 64.62 65.39 97.91 110.41 126.31 126.48 126.10

Lab A - Test 2 64.95 66.37 66.29 94.14 110.45 125.61 126.32 126.16

Lab A - Test 3 64.97 67.91 67.85 95.65 110.45 126.36 126.40 126.34

Lab B - Test 1 64.94 71.11 75.75 114.46 127.42 126.83 126.59

Lab B - Test 2 64.72 72.19 69.43 110.92 125.10 127.40 127.32

Lab B - Test 3 64.61 70.84 66.98 105.00 128.21 127.67 127.37

Lab C - Test 1 64.67 67.58 66.02 91.60 108.90 123.65 126.61 126.37

Lab C - Test 2 64.70 66.15 66.11 91.69 109.01 116.79 127.14 126.72

Lab C - Test 3 64.73 64.61 65.39 91.68 104.10 117.02 126.92 126.52

Lab D - Test 1 65.14 65.09 65.83 87.44 100.85 126.32 125.44

Lab D - Test 2 65.21 65.13 65.10 90.98 103.76 125.95 125.23

Lab D - Test 3 65.16 65.12 65.09 89.66 106.07 126.24 125.51

MEDIAN 64.84 66.26 66.07 92.92 109.71 124.63 126.55 126.36

MEAN 64.87 67.23 67.10 96.76 112.06 122.62 126.69 126.31

STD DEV 0.22 2.74 3.00 8.74 9.48 4.54 0.51 0.68

COV 0.34% 4.13% 4.54% 9.40% 8.64% 3.64% 0.41% 0.54%

MAX 65.21 72.19 75.75 114.46 128.21 126.36 127.67 127.37

MIN 64.60 64.61 65.09 87.44 100.85 116.79 125.95 125.23

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 0.93% 10.50% 14.07% 23.60% 21.34% 7.57% 1.35% 1.68%
10

Table 7: Distance Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 3

0 Lux 10 Lux 12 Lux 35 Lux 50 Lux 75 Lux 100 Lux 300 Lux

Lab A - Test 1 46.11 65.08 67.65 95.32 100.85 100.75 100.62 100.61

Lab A - Test 2 45.86 66.14 69.19 96.67 100.83 100.75 100.66 100.59

Lab A - Test 3 45.89 64.87 67.50 95.24 100.78 100.68 100.83 100.69

Lab B - Test 1 46.38 69.73 78.32 78.29 89.64 101.78 101.71

Lab B - Test 2 46.53 65.64 68.25 96.40 102.01 102.05 101.87

Lab B - Test 3 46.53 65.61 66.93 96.44 102.18 102.04 101.88

Lab C - Test 1 45.74 64.66 67.20 93.24 100.43 100.26 100.20 100.15

Lab C - Test 2 46.11 64.02 66.50 92.48 101.05 101.03 100.96 100.90

Lab C - Test 3 45.46 64.44 67.00 93.05 100.29 100.26 100.13 100.20

Lab D - Test 1 46.06 62.06 64.93 93.53 100.98 100.87 100.94

Lab D - Test 2 46.03 63.18 65.98 90.84 101.08 101.00 100.87

Lab D - Test 3 46.33 62.23 66.45 92.22 101.09 101.08 100.94

MEDIAN 46.09 64.77 67.10 93.39 100.91 100.72 100.92 100.88

MEAN 46.09 64.80 67.99 92.81 100.10 100.62 101.02 100.95

STD DEV 0.32 2.02 3.43 4.95 3.34 0.30 0.64 0.59

COV 0.70% 3.13% 5.11% 5.30% 3.31% 0.30% 0.63% 0.58%

MAX 46.53 69.73 78.32 96.67 102.18 101.03 102.05 101.88

MIN 45.46 62.06 64.93 78.29 89.64 100.26 100.13 100.15

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 2.30% 11.01% 17.10% 19.01% 12.27% 0.76% 1.88% 1.70%
11

Table 8: Pon Representation Analysis for TV 3 using the Distance Test Set-up 

Pon Mean of Pon UCL/1.05

Rep 

Rating

Lab A - Test 1 77.43

77.63 74.58 77.63

Lab A - Test 2 78.10

Lab A - Test 3 77.37

Lab B - Test 1 76.19

77.50 75.63 77.50

Lab B - Test 2 78.31

Lab B - Test 3 77.99

Lab C - Test 1 76.60

76.51 73.01 76.51

Lab C - Test 2 76.51

Lab C - Test 3 76.41

Lab D - Test 1 76.35

76.28 73.10 76.28

Lab D - Test 2 75.96

Lab D - Test 3 76.52

MEDIAN 76.56 77.00

MEAN 76.98 76.98

STD DEV 0.82 0.68

COV 1.06% 0.89%

MAX 78.31 77.63

MIN 75.96 76.28

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 3.00% 1.74%

Note:

The DOE SNOPR proposes that Pon is the equal weighting of power measurement (in watts) of 3, 

12, 35, and 100. The round robin testing was not performed at 3 lux, and therefore DOE 

calculated Pon using the equal weightings of power measurement (in watts) of 0, 12, 35, and 100 

from the round robin.

The SNOPR also proposes to use a IR/UV blocking filter but the Round Robin Testing was 

conducted prior to the IR/UV blocking filter investigation and therefore does not use this filter. 

DOE testing shows that an IR/UV block filter will reduce power measurements by 30% to 40%, 

and should also reduce variability. 

Finally, the SNOPR provides a sampling plan where a minimum of two units of a TV basic 

model must be tested for any value used for a representation rating. The representation rating is 

the higher of the sample mean and the UCL/1.05. The three tests at each lab are treated as tests 

of three basic models and used in the sampling plan calculation to determine the representation 

rating.
12

Table 9: Adjacent Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 3

0 Lux 10 Lux 12 Lux 35 Lux 50 Lux 75 Lux 100 Lux 300 Lux

Lab A - Test 1 45.96 93.63 100.81 101.12 100.88 100.73 100.66 100.62

Lab A - Test 2 45.84 95.18 99.41 100.76 100.72 100.65 100.61 100.57

Lab A - Test 3 45.84 93.48 99.41 100.73 100.70 100.72 100.69 100.66

Lab B - Test 1 46.60 102.53 93.17 102.04 101.92 101.94 101.97

Lab B - Test 2 46.50 79.93 87.32 102.30 76.95 101.94 102.19

Lab B - Test 3 46.58 66.99 92.04 102.44 102.32 102.15 102.11

Lab C - Test 1 45.36 91.35 100.35 100.23 100.20 100.17 100.16 100.15

Lab C - Test 2 46.13 101.29 101.60 101.05 100.87 100.90 100.83 100.83

Lab C - Test 3 45.40 94.75 100.37 100.29 100.22 100.14 100.17 100.16

Lab D - Test 1 46.27 96.62 101.27 101.09 101.07 100.97 100.98

Lab D - Test 2 46.07 96.39 101.19 101.14 101.01 101.03 100.89

Lab D - Test 3 46.21 99.45 95.26 100.96 100.93 100.88 100.86

MEDIAN 46.10 94.97 99.88 101.07 100.88 100.69 100.86 100.85

MEAN 46.06 92.63 97.68 101.18 98.98 100.55 101.00 101.00

STD DEV 0.41 9.92 4.63 0.72 6.96 0.32 0.67 0.71

COV 0.89% 10.45% 4.64% 0.71% 6.90% 0.32% 0.66% 0.70%

MAX 46.60 102.53 101.60 102.44 102.32 100.90 102.15 102.19

MIN 45.36 66.99 87.32 100.23 76.95 100.14 100.16 100.15

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 2.66% 34.66% 14.06% 2.16% 24.79% 0.75% 1.95% 2.00%
13

Table 10: Distance Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 4

0 Lux 10 Lux 12 Lux 35 Lux 50 Lux 75 Lux 100 Lux 300 Lux

Lab A - Test 1 47.88 69.73 70.38 77.02 77.58 77.60 77.37 77.39

Lab A - Test 2 47.64 69.64 70.25 77.10 77.41 77.37 77.41 77.52

Lab A - Test 3 47.54 69.41 70.20 76.75 77.54 77.47 77.41 77.67

Lab B - Test 1 48.42 70.99 71.29 77.76 79.62 79.62 79.54

Lab B - Test 2 48.56 71.18 71.52 78.85 79.68 79.67 79.61

Lab B - Test 3 48.53 71.08 71.43 78.30 79.66 79.62 79.73

Lab C - Test 1 48.27 69.98 70.61 77.17 78.20 78.04 78.08 78.18

Lab C - Test 2 48.10 69.80 70.50 77.00 77.80 78.00 77.80 77.70

Lab C - Test 3 48.18 69.84 70.56 77.38 77.84 77.83 77.60 78.02

Lab D - Test 1 48.11 66.11 66.94 73.65 76.15 77.72 77.66

Lab D - Test 2 48.02 65.30 67.42 75.29 76.32 77.76 77.71

Lab D - Test 3 48.21 67.60 69.38 75.61 78.04 78.03 77.97

MEDIAN 48.14 69.77 70.44 77.06 77.82 77.72 77.78 77.84

MEAN 48.12 69.22 70.04 76.82 77.99 77.72 78.17 78.22

STD DEV 0.32 1.90 1.46 1.40 1.18 0.28 0.91 0.87

COV 0.66% 2.73% 2.08% 1.82% 1.51% 0.36% 1.17% 1.12%

MAX 48.56 71.18 71.52 78.85 79.68 78.04 79.67 79.73

MIN 47.54 65.30 66.94 73.65 76.15 77.37 77.37 77.39

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 2.10% 8.27% 6.40% 6.59% 4.43% 0.86% 2.89% 2.93%
14

Table 11: Pon Representation Analysis for TV 4 using the Distance Test Set-up 

Pon Mean of Pon UCL/1.05

Rep 

Rating

Lab A - Test 1 68.16

68.08 64.99 68.08

Lab A - Test 2 68.10

Lab A - Test 3 67.98

Lab B - Test 1 69.27

69.46 66.46 69.46

Lab B - Test 2 69.65

Lab B - Test 3 69.47

Lab C - Test 1 68.53

68.44 65.33 68.44

Lab C - Test 2 68.35

Lab C - Test 3 68.43

Lab D - Test 1 66.60

67.18 64.95 67.18

Lab D - Test 2 67.12

Lab D - Test 3 67.81

MEDIAN 68.26 68.26

MEAN 68.29 68.29

STD DEV 0.90 0.95

COV 1.32% 1.38%

MAX 69.65 69.46

MIN 66.60 67.18

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 4.37% 3.29%

Note:

The DOE SNOPR proposes that Pon is the equal weighting of power measurement (in watts) of 3, 

12, 35, and 100. The round robin testing was not performed at 3 lux, and therefore DOE 

calculated Pon using the equal weightings of power measurement (in watts) of 0, 12, 35, and 100 

from the round robin.

The SNOPR also proposes to use a IR/UV blocking filter but the Round Robin Testing was 

conducted prior to the IR/UV blocking filter investigation and therefore does not use this filter. 

DOE testing shows that an IR/UV block filter will reduce power measurements by 30% to 40%, 

and should also reduce variability. 

Finally, the SNOPR provides a sampling plan where a minimum of two units of a TV basic 

model must be tested for any value used for a representation rating. The representation rating is 

the higher of the sample mean and the UCL/1.05. The three tests at each lab are treated as tests 

of three basic models and used in the sampling plan calculation to determine the representation 

rating.
15

Table 12: Adjacent Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 4

0 Lux 10 Lux 12 Lux 35 Lux 50 Lux 75 Lux 100 Lux 300 Lux

Lab A - Test 1 47.69 77.60 77.51 77.33 77.41 77.32 77.45 77.40

Lab A - Test 2 47.62 77.41 77.32 77.29 77.40 77.34 77.51 77.51

Lab A - Test 3 47.65 77.33 77.36 77.29 77.20 77.24 77.40 77.29

Lab B - Test 1 48.66 79.93 79.85 79.89 79.85 79.85 79.75

Lab B - Test 2 48.66 80.09 79.95 79.89 79.86 79.84 79.85

Lab B - Test 3 48.72 79.95 79.82 79.87 79.77 79.81 79.75

Lab C - Test 1 48.21 78.16 77.67 78.01 77.73 78.09 77.90 78.09

Lab C - Test 2 48.20 77.90 78.10 77.90 78.00 77.70 77.80 77.90

Lab C - Test 3 48.17 77.97 78.01 78.02 77.94 77.79 77.70 77.49

Lab D - Test 1 48.17 77.94 77.85 77.93 77.78 77.83 77.85

Lab D - Test 2 49.11 77.80 78.00 77.75 77.73 77.87 77.79

Lab D - Test 3 48.04 77.81 77.67 77.88 77.79 77.69 77.70

MEDIAN 48.19 77.92 77.93 77.92 77.78 77.52 77.82 77.82

MEAN 48.24 78.32 78.26 78.25 78.20 77.58 78.22 78.20

STD DEV 0.47 1.03 1.00 1.02 1.00 0.33 0.99 0.98

COV 0.97% 1.32% 1.29% 1.31% 1.29% 0.43% 1.27% 1.26%

MAX 49.11 80.09 79.95 79.89 79.86 78.09 79.85 79.85

MIN 47.62 77.33 77.32 77.29 77.20 77.24 77.40 77.29

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 3.03% 3.45% 3.29% 3.25% 3.33% 1.09% 3.07% 3.21%
16

Table 13: Distance Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 5

0 Lux 10 Lux 12 Lux 35 Lux 50 Lux 75 Lux 100 Lux 300 Lux

Lab A - Test 1 31.69 45.22 49.41 68.81 72.06 76.52 76.34 76.41

Lab A - Test 2 31.51 46.12 49.41 68.81 74.56 76.52 76.38 76.38

Lab A - Test 3 31.48 46.03 49.19 68.62 74.34 76.35 76.29 76.17

Lab B - Test 1 32.06 46.59 49.66 69.06 72.14 76.57 76.49

Lab B - Test 2 31.65 43.95 49.13 68.43 74.05 75.56 75.51

Lab B - Test 3 31.66 41.85 49.32 67.36 71.91 76.04 75.96

Lab C - Test 1 31.97 45.47 49.64 69.13 75.06 76.63 77.00 76.92

Lab C - Test 2 31.99 47.62 49.67 69.29 74.94 75.71 76.97 77.05

Lab C - Test 3 32.05 46.64 48.66 69.27 75.06 76.00 76.94 77.05

Lab D - Test 1 31.67 44.04 47.23 65.33 69.52 76.41 76.30

Lab D - Test 2 32.30 44.67 46.81 65.94 72.31 76.97 76.80

Lab D - Test 3 32.20 44.54 47.49 65.82 72.04 76.86 76.82

MEDIAN 31.83 45.35 49.26 68.72 73.18 76.44 76.49 76.45

MEAN 31.85 45.23 48.80 67.99 73.17 76.29 76.53 76.49

STD DEV 0.27 1.55 1.03 1.48 1.75 0.36 0.45 0.47

COV 0.86% 3.41% 2.09% 2.15% 2.39% 0.47% 0.58% 0.61%

MAX 32.30 47.62 49.67 69.29 75.06 76.63 77.00 77.05

MIN 31.48 41.85 46.81 65.33 69.52 75.71 75.56 75.51

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 2.53% 12.12% 5.76% 5.72% 7.38% 1.20% 1.87% 2.00%
17

Table 14: Pon Representation Analysis for TV 5 using the Distance Test Set-up 

Pon Mean of Pon UCL/1.05

Rep 

Rating

Lab A - Test 1 56.56

56.50 53.95 56.50

Lab A - Test 2 56.53

Lab A - Test 3 56.40

Lab B - Test 1 56.84

56.38 54.34 56.38

Lab B - Test 2 56.19

Lab B - Test 3 56.10

Lab C - Test 1 56.94

56.88 54.39 56.88

Lab C - Test 2 56.98

Lab C - Test 3 56.73

Lab D - Test 1 55.16

55.42 53.15 55.42

Lab D - Test 2 55.50

Lab D - Test 3 55.59

MEDIAN 56.46 56.44

MEAN 56.29 56.29

STD DEV 0.60 0.62

COV 1.07% 1.10%

MAX 56.98 56.88

MIN 55.16 55.42

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 3.20% 2.57%

Note:

The DOE SNOPR proposes that Pon is the equal weighting of power measurement (in watts) of 3, 

12, 35, and 100. The round robin testing was not performed at 3 lux, and therefore DOE 

calculated Pon using the equal weightings of power measurement (in watts) of 0, 12, 35, and 100 

from the round robin.

The SNOPR also proposes to use a IR/UV blocking filter but the Round Robin Testing was 

conducted prior to the IR/UV blocking filter investigation and therefore does not use this filter. 

DOE testing shows that an IR/UV block filter will reduce power measurements by 30% to 40%, 

and should also reduce variability. 

Finally, the SNOPR provides a sampling plan where a minimum of two units of a TV basic 

model must be tested for any value used for a representation rating. The representation rating is 

the higher of the sample mean and the UCL/1.05. The three tests at each lab are treated as tests 

of three basic models and used in the sampling plan calculation to determine the representation 

rating.
18

Table 15: Adjacent Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 5

0 Lux 10 Lux 12 Lux 35 Lux 50 Lux 75 Lux 100 Lux 300 Lux

Lab A - Test 1 31.60 76.81 76.42 76.25 76.29 76.16 76.17 76.09

Lab A - Test 2 31.41 76.68 76.40 76.28 76.23 76.15 76.09 76.01

Lab A - Test 3 31.39 76.38 76.30 76.16 76.15 76.11 76.10 76.16

Lab B - Test 1 31.82 74.77 76.22 76.04 75.97 75.87 75.80

Lab B - Test 2 31.79 74.57 76.06 75.83 75.74 75.60 75.60

Lab B - Test 3 31.88 69.03 74.76 76.28 76.13 75.96 75.98

Lab C - Test 1 31.97 77.54 77.18 76.96 76.98 75.90 76.75 76.72

Lab C - Test 2 31.91 77.43 77.10 76.98 76.84 75.56 76.73 76.82

Lab C - Test 3 32.01 77.56 77.06 77.03 76.94 76.02 76.75 76.74

Lab D - Test 1 31.63 72.15 76.48 76.44 76.42 76.37 76.24

Lab D - Test 2 32.13 75.17 76.92 76.91 76.88 76.80 76.74

Lab D - Test 3 31.94 75.02 75.13 76.68 76.52 76.41 76.43

MEDIAN 31.85 75.77 76.41 76.36 76.36 76.07 76.27 76.20

MEAN 31.79 75.26 76.34 76.49 76.42 75.98 76.30 76.28

STD DEV 0.24 2.52 0.75 0.41 0.41 0.23 0.40 0.41

COV 0.74% 3.33% 0.98% 0.54% 0.54% 0.30% 0.52% 0.54%

MAX 32.13 77.56 77.18 77.03 76.98 76.16 76.80 76.82

MIN 31.39 69.03 74.76 75.83 75.74 75.56 75.60 75.60

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 2.31% 11.00% 3.14% 1.56% 1.61% 0.79% 1.57% 1.59%
19

Table 16: Distance Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 6

0 Lux 10 Lux 12 Lux 35 Lux 50 Lux 75 Lux 100 Lux 300 Lux

Lab A - Test 1 28.43 28.49 29.81 40.24 42.08 43.58 44.94 46.31

Lab A - Test 2 28.26 28.24 29.56 40.08 41.82 43.05 44.62 45.88

Lab A - Test 3 28.15 28.22 29.57 39.94 41.87 43.14 44.52 45.85

Lab B - Test 1 28.85 29.80 31.26 41.14 42.69 45.47 46.66

Lab B - Test 2 28.91 29.77 30.81 41.05 42.93 45.80 46.69

Lab B - Test 3 28.89 29.03 30.46 41.20 42.84 45.80 46.82

Lab C - Test 1 28.82 28.85 29.42 40.39 42.46 43.60 45.06 46.71

Lab C - Test 2 28.85 28.83 30.04 40.44 42.40 43.79 45.11 46.80

Lab C - Test 3 28.61 28.66 29.08 40.06 42.01 43.25 44.55 46.37

MEDIAN 28.82 28.83 29.81 40.39 42.40 43.42 45.06 46.66

MEAN 28.64 28.88 30.00 40.50 42.34 43.40 45.10 46.45

STD DEV 0.29 0.58 0.71 0.50 0.42 0.30 0.50 0.38

COV 1.02% 2.02% 2.39% 1.23% 0.99% 0.68% 1.11% 0.81%

MAX 28.91 29.80 31.26 41.20 42.93 43.79 45.80 46.82

MIN 28.15 28.22 29.08 39.94 41.82 43.05 44.52 45.85

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 2.63% 5.30% 6.97% 3.06% 2.59% 1.69% 2.79% 2.07%
20

Table 17: Pon Representation Analysis for TV 6 using the Distance Test Set-up 

Pon Mean of Pon UCL/1.05

Rep 

Rating

Lab A - Test 1 35.86

35.68 34.23 35.68

Lab A - Test 2 35.63

Lab A - Test 3 35.55

Lab B - Test 1 36.68

36.64 34.97 36.64

Lab B - Test 2 36.64

Lab B - Test 3 36.59

Lab C - Test 1 35.92

35.87 34.60 35.87

Lab C - Test 2 36.11

Lab C - Test 3 35.58

MEDIAN 35.92 35.87

MEAN 36.06 36.06

STD DEV 0.47 0.51

COV 1.30% 1.41%

MAX 36.68 36.64

MIN 35.55 35.68

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 3.09% 2.62%

Note:

The DOE SNOPR proposes that Pon is the equal weighting of power measurement (in watts) of 3, 

12, 35, and 100. The round robin testing was not performed at 3 lux, and therefore DOE 

calculated Pon using the equal weightings of power measurement (in watts) of 0, 12, 35, and 100 

from the round robin.

The SNOPR also proposes to use a IR/UV blocking filter but the Round Robin Testing was 

conducted prior to the IR/UV blocking filter investigation and therefore does not use this filter. 

DOE testing shows that an IR/UV block filter will reduce power measurements by 30% to 40%, 

and should also reduce variability. 

Finally, the SNOPR provides a sampling plan where a minimum of two units of a TV basic 

model must be tested for any value used for a representation rating. The representation rating is 

the higher of the sample mean and the UCL/1.05. The three tests at each lab are treated as tests 

of three basic models and used in the sampling plan calculation to determine the representation 

rating.
21

Table 18: Adjacent Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 6

0 Lux 10 Lux 12 Lux 35 Lux 50 Lux 75 Lux 100 Lux 300 Lux

Lab A - Test 1 28.48 31.13 32.28 40.07 41.62 42.57 43.33 42.63

Lab A - Test 2 28.19 30.95 32.05 39.84 41.17 42.25 43.05 42.39

Lab A - Test 3 28.20 30.66 31.89 39.62 41.09 42.25 43.02 42.41

Lab B - Test 1 28.92 28.88 35.31 40.23 38.95 41.18 44.47

Lab B - Test 2 28.87 28.88 28.87 32.20 36.06 40.13 43.47

Lab B - Test 3 28.87 33.51 34.39 41.77 40.10 43.37 43.02

Lab C - Test 1 28.74 30.47 32.25 40.18 41.64 42.74 43.32 42.88

Lab C - Test 2 28.71 31.20 32.02 40.39 41.73 42.95 42.87 42.98

Lab C - Test 3 28.69 31.48 28.69 40.34 41.68 42.80 43.62 42.75

MEDIAN 28.71 30.95 32.05 40.18 41.17 42.66 43.05 42.88

MEAN 28.63 30.80 31.97 39.40 40.45 42.59 42.65 43.00

STD DEV 0.28 1.40 2.17 2.77 1.89 0.29 1.18 0.64

COV 0.97% 4.51% 6.76% 6.89% 4.59% 0.69% 2.75% 1.50%

MAX 28.92 33.51 35.31 41.77 41.73 42.95 43.62 44.47

MIN 28.19 28.88 28.69 32.20 36.06 42.25 40.13 42.39

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 2.52% 13.82% 18.75% 22.91% 13.59% 1.63% 8.00% 4.68%
22

Table 19: Distance Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 7

0 Lux 10 Lux 12 Lux 35 Lux 50 Lux 75 Lux 100 Lux 300 Lux

Lab A - Test 1 44.13 44.12 44.10 45.75 47.37 50.66 54.72 73.96

Lab A - Test 2 43.80 43.81 43.81 45.46 48.76 52.01 55.26 75.53

Lab A - Test 3 43.79 43.77 43.79 45.44 47.09 49.51 51.99 70.03

Lab B - Test 1 44.46 44.43 46.12 44.41 46.09 49.44 67.22

Lab B - Test 2 44.06 44.06 44.06 47.46 47.46 50.81 66.90

Lab B - Test 3 44.17 44.16 44.15 45.85 45.82 50.87 66.96

Lab C - Test 1 43.90 43.88 43.86 47.17 48.83 53.66 56.80 79.32

Lab C - Test 2 43.94 43.90 43.88 45.53 45.54 48.80 50.48 66.21

Lab C - Test 3 43.84 44.63 45.52 50.44 53.67 58.52 63.19 85.82

Lab D - Test 1 44.00 44.00 43.98 43.95 45.64 54.08 86.04

Lab D - Test 2 43.90 43.91 43.90 45.55 47.19 55.27 86.01

Lab D - Test 3 44.16 44.14 44.16 45.80 47.89 53.92 86.23

MEDIAN 43.97 44.03 44.02 45.65 47.28 51.34 54.00 74.75

MEAN 44.01 44.07 44.28 46.07 47.61 52.19 53.90 75.85

STD DEV 0.19 0.25 0.74 1.68 2.21 3.56 3.73 8.48

COV 0.44% 0.58% 1.69% 3.68% 4.68% 6.93% 6.91% 11.34%

MAX 44.46 44.63 46.12 50.44 53.67 58.52 63.19 86.23

MIN 43.79 43.77 43.79 43.95 45.54 48.80 49.44 66.21

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 1.51% 1.93% 5.05% 12.87% 15.15% 16.61% 21.76% 23.22%
23

Table 20: Pon Representation Analysis for TV 7 using the Distance Test Set-up 

Pon Mean of Pon UCL/1.05

Rep 

Rating

Lab A - Test 1 47.18

46.84 45.42 46.84

Lab A - Test 2 47.08

Lab A - Test 3 46.25

Lab B - Test 1 46.11

46.32 44.52 46.32

Lab B - Test 2 46.60

Lab B - Test 3 46.26

Lab C - Test 1 47.93

48.21 49.78 49.78

Lab C - Test 2 45.96

Lab C - Test 3 50.75

Lab D - Test 1 46.50

46.89 45.21 46.89

Lab D - Test 2 47.16

Lab D - Test 3 47.01

MEDIAN 46.80 46.86

MEAN 47.07 47.46

STD DEV 1.29 1.57

COV 2.74% 3.31%

MAX 50.75 49.78

MIN 45.96 46.32

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 9.44% 6.95%

Note:

The DOE SNOPR proposes that Pon is the equal weighting of power measurement (in watts) of 3, 

12, 35, and 100. The round robin testing was not performed at 3 lux, and therefore DOE 

calculated Pon using the equal weightings of power measurement (in watts) of 0, 12, 35, and 100 

from the round robin.

The SNOPR also proposes to use a IR/UV blocking filter but the Round Robin Testing was 

conducted prior to the IR/UV blocking filter investigation and therefore does not use this filter. 

DOE testing shows that an IR/UV block filter will reduce power measurements by 30% to 40%, 

and should also reduce variability. 

Finally, the SNOPR provides a sampling plan where a minimum of two units of a TV basic 

model must be tested for any value used for a representation rating. The representation rating is 

the higher of the sample mean and the UCL/1.05. The three tests at each lab are treated as tests 

of three basic models and used in the sampling plan calculation to determine the representation 

rating.
24

Table 21: Adjacent Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 7

0 Lux 10 Lux 12 Lux 35 Lux 50 Lux 75 Lux 100 Lux 300 Lux

Lab A - Test 1 43.82 53.67 55.30 73.56 83.82 85.78 85.79 85.82

Lab A - Test 2 43.80 52.02 55.26 73.54 83.77 85.78 85.77 85.85

Lab A - Test 3 43.91 53.06 55.27 73.53 85.77 85.85 85.77 85.76

Lab B - Test 1 44.15 60.65 47.50 55.79 90.41 82.95 106.37

Lab B - Test 2 44.15 52.45 59.04 73.06 78.62 101.28 106.49

Lab B - Test 3 44.13 52.49 52.48 68.72 85.16 106.42 106.48

Lab C - Test 1 44.07 53.94 57.16 73.90 85.86 86.03 86.01 86.02

Lab C - Test 2 45.85 53.68 56.87 81.16 85.85 85.86 85.79 85.84

Lab C - Test 3 43.81 48.80 50.41 73.19 79.06 85.75 85.80 85.74

Lab D - Test 1 44.24 54.08 57.20 79.65 86.23 86.24 86.42

Lab D - Test 2 44.01 52.12 54.99 75.20 84.14 86.07 86.06

Lab D - Test 3 44.01 53.19 56.94 78.97 85.92 86.00 86.00

MEDIAN 44.04 53.12 55.29 73.55 85.47 85.82 85.90 86.01

MEAN 44.16 53.35 54.87 73.36 84.55 85.84 88.66 91.07

STD DEV 0.55 2.70 3.26 6.51 3.18 0.10 7.23 9.27

COV 1.25% 5.08% 5.89% 8.85% 3.72% 0.12% 8.42% 10.78%

MAX 45.85 60.65 59.04 81.16 90.41 86.03 106.42 106.49

MIN 43.80 48.80 47.50 55.79 78.62 85.75 82.95 85.74

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 4.47% 19.54% 19.55% 31.26% 13.04% 0.33% 22.05% 19.49%
25

Table 22: Distance Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 8

0 Lux 10 Lux 12 Lux 35 Lux 50 Lux 75 Lux 100 Lux 300 Lux

Lab A - Test 1 114.29 114.22 114.27 114.20 120.68 129.28 142.41 164.85

Lab A - Test 2 113.95 114.42 114.44 114.38 120.99 129.63 142.90 165.36

Lab A - Test 3 114.69 114.84 114.89 114.97 121.35 129.79 142.11 165.28

Lab B - Test 1 116.89 116.90 116.91 120.44 123.64 146.33 169.60

Lab B - Test 2 116.96 117.15 117.24 117.28 124.07 147.14 170.47

Lab B - Test 3 117.16 117.25 117.28 117.29 124.10 147.22 170.67

Lab C - Test 1 114.84 115.06 115.24 121.85 121.88 137.18 143.70 166.42

Lab C - Test 2 115.33 115.70 115.79 122.54 122.56 143.63 151.02 167.05

Lab C - Test 3 116.46 116.60 116.66 123.36 132.22 142.45 152.83 168.91

Lab D - Test 1 116.03 116.12 116.13 116.11 122.63 144.67 167.04

Lab D - Test 2 115.76 115.81 115.84 115.86 122.48 137.74 167.81

Lab D - Test 3 115.89 116.02 116.08 116.07 122.63 137.82 167.26

MEDIAN 115.82 115.91 115.96 116.70 122.59 133.49 144.19 167.16

MEAN 115.69 115.84 115.90 117.86 123.27 135.33 144.66 167.56

STD DEV 1.08 1.04 1.03 3.30 3.03 6.68 4.60 1.99

COV 0.93% 0.89% 0.89% 2.82% 2.47% 5.00% 3.19% 1.19%

MAX 117.16 117.25 117.28 123.36 132.22 143.63 152.83 170.67

MIN 113.95 114.22 114.27 114.20 120.68 129.28 137.74 164.85

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 2.74% 2.58% 2.57% 7.43% 8.73% 9.99% 9.88% 3.41%
26

Table 23: Pon Representation Analysis for TV 8 using the Distance Test Set-up 

Pon Mean of Pon UCL/1.05

Rep 

Rating

Lab A - Test 1 121.29

121.46 115.98 121.46

Lab A - Test 2 121.42

Lab A - Test 3 121.67

Lab B - Test 1 125.14

124.85 119.32 124.85

Lab B - Test 2 124.66

Lab B - Test 3 124.74

Lab C - Test 1 123.91

125.80 122.60 125.80

Lab C - Test 2 126.17

Lab C - Test 3 127.33

Lab D - Test 1 123.24

122.00 117.91 122.00

Lab D - Test 2 121.30

Lab D - Test 3 121.46

MEDIAN 123.57 123.42

MEAN 123.53 123.53

STD DEV 2.11 2.12

COV 1.71% 1.72%

MAX 127.33 125.80

MIN 121.29 121.46

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 4.74% 3.45%

Note:

The DOE SNOPR proposes that Pon is the equal weighting of power measurement (in watts) of 3, 

12, 35, and 100. The round robin testing was not performed at 3 lux, and therefore DOE 

calculated Pon using the equal weightings of power measurement (in watts) of 0, 12, 35, and 100 

from the round robin.

The SNOPR also proposes to use a IR/UV blocking filter but the Round Robin Testing was 

conducted prior to the IR/UV blocking filter investigation and therefore does not use this filter. 

DOE testing shows that an IR/UV block filter will reduce power measurements by 30% to 40%, 

and should also reduce variability. 

Finally, the SNOPR provides a sampling plan where a minimum of two units of a TV basic 

model must be tested for any value used for a representation rating. The representation rating is 

the higher of the sample mean and the UCL/1.05. The three tests at each lab are treated as tests 

of three basic models and used in the sampling plan calculation to determine the representation 

rating.
27

Table 24: Adjacent Test Set-up Raw Data and Statistical Analysis for TV 8

0 Lux 10 Lux 12 Lux 35 Lux 50 Lux 75 Lux 100 Lux 300 Lux

Lab A - Test 1 114.50 129.81 135.43 165.71 164.88 164.50 164.92 164.50

Lab A - Test 2 114.40 129.94 135.24 166.61 165.78 165.69 165.13 165.25

Lab A - Test 3 114.72 130.44 135.56 166.93 166.02 165.83 165.38 165.44

Lab B - Test 1 116.09 116.20 116.31 139.12 116.79 169.71 168.49

Lab B - Test 2 116.71 116.79 116.82 132.48 132.49 132.58 170.63

Lab B - Test 3 117.05 117.09 117.13 133.10 124.07 171.93 171.08

Lab C - Test 1 115.63 131.18 138.03 151.78 167.73 167.07 166.84 166.82

Lab C - Test 2 115.54 131.30 115.93 167.68 167.92 167.97 168.04 168.13

Lab C - Test 3 116.10 132.07 152.96 169.00 168.23 167.77 167.55 167.41

Lab D - Test 1 115.25 121.78 130.16 166.11 165.50 164.67 164.59

Lab D - Test 2 115.63 122.28 130.77 167.18 166.17 165.70 165.60

Lab D - Test 3 115.56 128.86 130.66 167.14 166.18 166.10 166.09

MEDIAN 115.59 129.33 130.72 166.36 165.90 166.45 165.90 166.46

MEAN 115.60 125.64 129.58 157.74 155.98 166.47 164.05 167.00

STD DEV 0.82 6.33 11.29 14.55 19.33 1.36 10.14 2.21

COV 0.71% 4.89% 8.64% 8.74% 11.65% 0.81% 6.11% 1.33%

MAX 117.05 132.07 152.96 169.00 168.23 167.97 171.93 171.08

MIN 114.40 116.20 115.93 132.48 116.79 164.50 132.58 164.50

% DIFF 

(MIN to MAX) 2.26% 12.02% 24.21% 21.61% 30.58% 2.07% 22.89% 3.85%