alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [NM-952-00-1420-BJ]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The plats of survey described below are scheduled to be officially filed in the New Mexico State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Santa Fe, New Mexico, (30) thirty calendar days from the date of this publication.

## New Mexico Principal Meridian, New Mexico:

T. 29 N., R. 15 W., approved April 20, 2000, for Group 955 NM;

T. 29 N., R. 14 W., approved April 25, 2000, for Group 955 NM;

T. 29 N., R. 16 W., approved May 1, 2000,    for Group 955 NM;

T. 14 S., R. 10 E., approved April 27, 2000, for Group 962 NM;

T. 21 N., R. 6 E.,  approved April 27, 2000, for Group 73 OK; 

Amended Protraction Diagrams for Tps. 7-12 S., R. 21 W., approved May 4, 2000;

If a protest against a survey, as shown on any of the above plats is received prior to the date of official filing, the filing will be stayed pending consideration of the protest. A plat will not be officially filed until the day after all protests have been dismissed and become final or appeals from the dismissal affirmed.

A person or party who wishes to protest against any of these surveys must file a written protest with the NM State Director, Bureau of Land Management, stating that they wish to protest.

A statement of reasons for a protest may be filed with the notice of protest to the State Director, or the statement of reasons must be filed with the State Director within thirty (30) days after the protest is filed. The above-listed plats represent dependent resurveys, surveys, and subdivisions.

These plats will be available for inspection in the New Mexico State Office, Bureau of Land Management, P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502-0115. Copies may be obtained from this office upon payment of $1.10 per sheet.

Dated: May 4, 2000.

James D. Claflin.

Acting Chief Cadastral Surveyor for New Mexico.

[FR Doc. 00-11916 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
§ 382.33 May carriers impose other restrictions on passengers with a disability that they do not impose on other passengers? ( a ) As a carrier, you must not subject passengers with a disability to restrictions that do not apply to other passengers, except as otherwise permitted in this part (*e.g.,* advance notice requirements for certain services permitted by § 382.27).
( b ) Restrictions you must not impose on passengers with a disability include, but are not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Restricting passengers” movement within the terminal;
( 2 ) Requiring passengers to remain in a holding area or other location in order to receive transportation, services, or accommodations;
( 3 ) Making passengers sit on blankets on the aircraft;
( 4 ) Making passengers wear badges or other special identification (*e.g.,* similar to badges worn by unaccompanied minors); or
( 5 ) Otherwise mandating separate treatment for passengers with a disability, unless permitted or required by this part or other applicable Federal requirements.
From: Richard Krock <rkrock@vinylinfo.org>

To: Jodi Howard/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Mary Bachynsky <mbachynsky@fpcusa.com>, 

"Barry_H._Christensen@oxy.com" <Barry_H._Christensen@oxy.com>, "Kevin

Bloomer (kbloomer@westlake.com)" <kbloomer@westlake.com>, Mark 

Garza <mgarza@shin-tech.com>, "'Sistrunk, Otis J.

(PED)'" <Otis.Sistrunk@polyone.com>, JC Walker 

<walker@khlaw.com>

Date: 10/19/2009 07:14 PM

Subject: PVC MACT Section 114 Request Survey Request

Dear Ms. Howard,

The attached file contains our first set of questions that The Vinyl

Institute members have compiled in order to clarify some of the

information requested in the subject survey. Please review the

questions and return your responses to those copied on this e-mail. If

you post the answers at a designated EPA portal, please forward the

pathway to us. Your quick clarification to our questions is appreciated

so that those compiling the significant amount of data can successfully

complete the preparation of the survey for the November 30, 2009

deadline. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or

comments. Thank you.

*Please note our new contact information*

Richard Krock

Technical Director

The Vinyl Institute

1737 King Street Suite 390

Alexandria, VA 22314

Direct: 571.970.3392

Mobile: 571.216.4474

Fax: 571.970.3271

Email: rkrock@vinylinfo.org

http://www.vinylinfo.org

http://www.vinylindesign.com

(See attached file: Survey Questions Rollup as of 10-19-09.doc)(Embedded

image moved to file: pic09425.jpg)VI Logo
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00811-CR

NO. 03-05-00812-CR

NO. 03-05-00813-CR

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.

John Dominick Colyandro, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. D-1-DC-05-904150, D-1-DC-05-904156 & D-1-DC-05-904159

HONORABLE WAYNE PATRICK PRIEST, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The State appeals the district court’s order quashing those portions of the indictments

against John Dominick Colyandro accusing him of conspiring to violate the election code. See Tex.

Pen. Code Ann. § 15.02 (West 2003); Tex. Elec. Code Ann. §§ 253.003, .094, .104 (West 2003).

These causes are companions to those before us in State v. DeLay, Nos. 03-05-00817-CR and 03-05-

00818-CR, decided this day, and raise the same issue: whether the penal code’s conspiracy provision

applied to the election code at the time of the alleged criminal conduct. For the reasons stated in

DeLay, we hold that it did not.
2

The district court’s order is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Puryear and Waldrop

Affirmed

Filed: April 19, 2006

Do Not Publish
```

[House Document 113-119]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

113th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 113-119

 
             DEPLOYMENT OF U.S. MILITARY PERSONNEL IN IRAQ

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

   A LETTER INFORMING THE CONGRESS THAT APPROXIMATELY 275 U.S. ARMED 
FORCES PERSONNEL WERE DEPLOYED TO IRAQ TO SUPPORT THE SECURITY OF U.S. 
                       PERSONNEL AND THE EMBASSY

   June 17, 2014.--Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 
                         ordered to be printed
                                           The White House,
                                         Washington, June 16, 2014.
Hon. John Boehner,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: Starting on June 15, 2014, up to 
approximately 275 U.S. Armed Forces personnel are deploying to 
Iraq to provide support and security for U.S, personnel and the 
U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. This force is deploying for the 
purpose of protecting U.S. citizens and property, if necessary, 
and is equipped for combat. This force will remain in Iraq 
until the security situation becomes such that it is no longer 
needed.
    This action has been directed consistent with my 
responsibility to protect U.S. citizens both at home and 
abroad, and in furtherance of U.S. national security and 
foreign policy interests, pursuant to my constitutional 
authority to conduct U.S. foreign relations and as Commander in 
Chief and Chief Executive.
    I am providing this report as part of my efforts to keep 
the Congress fully informed, consistent with the War Powers 
Resolution (Public Law 93-148). I appreciate the support of the 
Congress in these actions.
            Sincerely,
                                                      Barack Obama.

                                  

```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE SECOND
QUARTER 1999 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENTS OF INCOME, CASH FLOWS AND
CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,735
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  159,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    209,455
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               558,894
<PP&E>                                       1,327,083
<DEPRECIATION>                               (142,076)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,550,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          662,413
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,051
<COMMON>                                        16,150
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,934,273
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,550,151
<SALES>                                        266,155
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               266,155
<CGS>                                           85,536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  496,398
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (315,780)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (315,780)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (315,780)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.013)
        

</TABLE>
#### Commonwealth v. Hile

*Harold S. Irwin, Jr.,*Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth.

*George F. Douglas, Jr.,*for defendant.

November 29, 1957.

Shughart, P. J.,

Counsel for defendant in the above case has filed a motion to quash the information on the ground that defendant had previously entered a plea of guilty to the charge of reckless driving, which is a summary offense, and for this reason moves to quash the instant information charging the offense of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, on the basis of a plea of autrefois convict.

No authority has been cited to us, nor has our own research revealed any authority, for the proposition that the plea of autrefois convict can be entered even after an indictment has been found, let alone prior to the laying of an indictment. Generally, plea of autrefois convict is a matter of defense to be raised at the *92trial of the case, and may not even be raised in a motion to quash an indictment: Commonwealth v. Morning-star, 82 Pa. Superior Ct. 425.

For this reason, we deem the present motion to be premature and it must, therefore, be overruled.

And now, November 29, 1957, at 3:10 p.m,. for the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the motion to quash the information be and is hereby overruled.
#### Melville *vs.*Hazlett.

In this case the Chief Justice refused to strike out a plea as *frivolous*; the only objection to it being that it amounted to the general issue, or in other words that the matter alleged in it might be given in evidence under the general issue.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
     Pursuantto Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14 as adopted pursuant toSection 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:
I, Mark A. Slaven, as Chief Financial Officer of SpectraSite, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report (the“Report”) on Form 10-Q ofSpectraSite, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisReport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this Report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this Report is being prepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this Report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on suchevaluation; and c. Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 3, 2004 By: /s/ Mark A. Slaven     Name: Mark A. Slaven Title: Chief Financial Officer
63
Order entered June 5, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01352-CR

GLENN LOUIS BAKER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-82158-2014

ORDER

Appellant, who was convicted of indecency with a child by sexual contact, filed a brief 

on May 20, 2019. In the brief, appellant uses the names of the child victim, certain child

witnesses, and other children. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b) (“Unless a court orders otherwise, an 

electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not 

contain sensitive data.”), id. 9.10(a)(3) (“Sensitive Data Defined. Sensitive data consists of: (1) a 

driver’s license number, passport number, social security number, tax identification number or 

similar government-issued personal identification number; (2) bank account number, credit card 

number, and other financial account number; (3) a birth date, a home address, and the name of 

any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.”). Accordingly, we 
STRIKE the brief filed in contravention of counsel’s certification that the brief complied with 

rule 9.10(a) and (b). See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(e).

We ORDER appellant to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, an amended 

brief that identifies the child victim and any other child (including witnesses) either generically 

(for example, “victim” or “victim’s younger sister”) or by initials only. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

9.10(d).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to David L. Botsford and the Collin 

County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE
### Appendix	C

DJI	Phantom	3	Pro	Checklist

Preflight

General	Inspection................Complete

Gimbal	Clamp........................Remove

Micro	SD	Card........................Installed

Propellers...............................Secured.	Check	condition	and	orientation

Tablet/Phone.........................Mounted	and	connected

TX Antennas...........................Positioned

Flight	Mode	Switch................Desired	mode

TX	Battery	level......................Check	fully	charged

Controller	Before	Start

Main	power...........................ON

Controller	LED......................Green

Status	LED.............................No	Errors

Tablet/Phone........................ON

DJI	Pilot	App ..........................Launch

Camera	Icon..........................Select

Camera	Options/Settings....Select

Aircraft	Before	Start

Position.................................Level	surface,	clear	area

Aircraft..................................Power	ON

Battery..................................Check	status	and	fully	charged

Compass calibration............Perform	only	if	at	a	new	site

Aircraft	Status	LED...............Check	no	errors

Take	off

DJI	Pilot	App.........................Check	good	GPS,	safe	to	fly	status

Take	off	Area........................Clear

Motors...................................Start

Take	off.................................Perform	Auto	or	Manual

Flig ht	Controls......................Check	proper	response

Landing

Landing	area.........................Clear

Landing.................................Initiate	slow	descent

Motors...................................Once	on	the	ground,	cut	motors

Aircraft	Power......................OFF

Controller	Power..................OFF

Tablet/Phone........................Exit	App, turn	OFF,	disconnect

Gimbal	Clamp.........

. ..............Install

Micro	SD	Card............ ...........Remove
#### § 93.301 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes special operating rules for all persons operating aircraft in the following airspace, designated as the Grand Canyon National Park Special Flight Rules Area: That airspace extending from the surface up to but not including 18,000 feet MSL within an area bounded by a line beginning at Lat. 35°55′12′′ N., Long. 112°04′05′′ W.; east to Lat. 35°55′30′′ N., Long. 111°45′00′′ W.; to Lat. 35°59′02′′ N., Long. 111°36′03′′ W.; north to Lat. 36°15′30′′ N., Long. 111°36′06′′ W.; to Lat. 36°24′49′′ N., Long. 111°47′45′′ W.; to Lat. 36°52′23′′ N., Long. 111°33′10′′ W.; west-northwest to Lat. 36°53′37′′ N., Long. 111°38′29′′ W.; southwest to Lat. 36°35′02′′ N., Long. 111°53′28′′ W.; to Lat. 36°21′30′′ N., Long. 112°00′03′′ W.; west-northwest to Lat. 36°30′30′′ N., Long. 112°35′59′′ W.; southwest to Lat. 36°24′46′′ N., Long. 112°51′10′′ W., thence west along the boundary of Grand Canyon National Park (GCNP) to Lat. 36°14′08′′ N., Long. 113°10′07′′ W.; west-southwest to Lat. 36°09′30′′ N., Long. 114°03′03′′ W.; southeast to Lat. 36°05′11′′ N., Long. 113°58′46′′ W.; thence south along the boundary of GCNP to Lat. 35°58′23′′ N., Long. 113°54′14′′ W.; north to Lat. 36°00′10′′ N., Long. 113°53′48′′ W.; northeast to Lat. 36°02′14′′ N., Long. 113°50′16′′ W.; to Lat. 36°02′17′′ N., Long. 113°53′48′′ W.; northeast to Lat. 36°02′14′′ N., Long. 113°50′16′′ W.; to Lat. 36°02′17′′ N., Long. 113°49′11′′ W.; southeast to Lat. 36°01′22′′ N., Long. 113°48′21′′ W.; to Lat. 35°59′15′′ N., Long. 113°47′13′′ W.; to Lat. 35°57′51′′ N., Long. 113°46′01′′ W.; to Lat. 35°57′45′′ N., Long. 113°45′23′′ W.; southwest to Lat. 35°54′48′′ N., Long. 113°50′24′′ W.; southeast to Lat. 35°41′01′′ N., Long. 113°35′27′′ W.; thence clockwise via the 4.2-nautical mile radius of the Peach Springs VORTAC to Lat. 36°38′53′′ N., Long. 113°27′49′′ W.; northeast to Lat. 35°42′58′′ N., Long. 113°10′57′′ W.; north to Lat. 35°57′51′′ N., Long. 113°11′06′′ W.; east to Lat. 35°57′44′′ N., Long. 112°14′04′′ W.; thence clockwise via the 4.3-nautical mile radius of the Grand Canyon National Park Airport reference point (Lat. 35°57′08′′ N., Long. 112°08′49′′ W.) to the point of origin.

[Doc. No. 5926, 65 FR 17742, Apr. 4, 2000]
§ 415.37 Flight readiness and communications plan. ( a ) *Flight readiness requirements.* An applicant must designate an individual responsible for flight readiness. The applicant must file the following procedures for verifying readiness for safe flight: ( 1 ) Launch readiness review procedures involving the applicant's flight safety personnel and Federal launch range personnel involved in the launch, as required by § 417.117(b)(3) of this chapter.
( 2 ) Procedures that ensure mission constraints, rules and abort procedures are listed and consolidated in a safety directive or notebook approved by licensee flight safety and Federal launch range personnel.
( 3 ) Procedures that ensure currency and consistency of licensee and Federal launch range countdown checklists.
( 4 ) Dress rehearsal procedures that— ( i ) Ensure crew readiness under nominal and non-nominal flight conditions;
( ii ) Contain criteria for determining whether to dispense with one or more dress rehearsals; and
( iii ) Verify currency and consistency of licensee and Federal launch range countdown checklists.
( 5 ) Procedures for ensuring the licensee's flight safety personnel adhere to the crew rest rules of § 417.113(f) of this chapter.
( b ) *Communications plan requirements.* An applicant must file a communications plan that meets § 417.111(k) of this chapter, and that provides licensee and Federal launch range personnel communications procedures during countdown and flight.
( c ) An applicant must file procedures that ensure that licensee and Federal launch range personnel receive a copy of the communications plan required by paragraph (b) of this section, and that the Federal launch range concurs in the communications plan.
[Doc. No. FAA-2000-7953, 71 FR 50531, Aug. 25, 2006, as amended by Amdt. No. 415-6, 81 FR 59439, Aug. 30, 2016]
#### Edwin W. Inslee et al., as Trustees of the Estate of Samuel Inslee, Deceased, Respondents, *v.*Maurice H. Bob, Appellant.

Argued March 10, 1937:

decided March 25, 1937.

*637
      *Joseph H. Robins*and *Henry Goldstein*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.