alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 382.111 What services must carriers provide to passengers with a disability on board the aircraft? As a carrier, you must provide services within the aircraft cabin as requested by or on behalf of passengers with a disability, or when offered by carrier personnel and accepted by passengers with a disability, as follows: ( a ) Assistance in moving to and from seats, as part of the enplaning and deplaning processes;
( b ) Assistance in preparation for eating, such as opening packages and identifying food;
( c ) If there is an on-board wheelchair on the aircraft, assistance with the use of the on-board wheelchair to enable the person to move to and from a lavatory;
( d ) Assistance to a semi-ambulatory person in moving to and from the lavatory, not involving lifting or carrying the person; or
( e ) Assistance in stowing and retrieving carry-on items, including mobility aids and other assistive devices stowed in the cabin (*see also* 382.91(d)). To receive such assistance, the passenger must self-identify as being an individual with a disability needing the assistance.
( f ) Effective communication with passengers who have vision impairments or who are deaf or hard-of-hearing, so that these passengers have prompt access to information the carrier provides to other passengers (*e.g.* weather, on-board services, flight delays, connecting gates at the next airport).
[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2004-19482, 73 FR 27665, May 13, 2008, as amended at 75 FR 44887, July 30, 2010]
#### § 385.18 Authority of the Docket Officer, Docket Operations Office.

The Docket Officer, Docket Operations Office, has the authority to coordinate and perform all administrative functions of the Department provided for in sections 2, 3 and 5 of Executive Order 12597 issued May 13, 1987, except that this delegation shall not include the exercise of the authority delegated by the President to the Secretary by sections 2 and 5 of that Order to determine not to disapprove orders of the Department in certain cases.

[Amdt. 385-3, 52 FR 18905, May 20, 1987. Redesignated by Doc. No. OST-96-1268, 61 FR 19170, May 1, 1996. Amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15944, Apr. 16, 2019]
###### Editorial Note on Part 399

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 399 appear at 84 FR 15947, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### §§ 399.13-399.17 [Reserved]
Exhibit 8.1

                            Significant Subsidiaries
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

         The following table sets forth our significant subsidiaries as of the date of this Annual Report.

                                                                                    Jurisdiction of  Percentage
Name of Company                                                                      Establishment      Owned
---------------                                                                      -------------      -----
<S>                                                                                                      <C>
CIBSA                                                                                 Mexico             99.99

     Coca-Cola FEMSA                                                                  Mexico             45.70(1)
             Propimex, S.A. de C.V..................................................  Mexico             45.70
             Inmuebles del Golfo, S.A. de C.V.......................................  Mexico             45.70
             Refrescos y Aguas Minerales, S.A. de C.V...............................  Mexico             45.70
             Coca-Cola FEMSA de Buenos Aires, S.A...................................  Argentina          45.70
             Corporacion Interamericana de Bebidas, S.A. de C.V. (Panamco)..........  Mexico             45.70(2)

Emprex                                                                                Mexico             99.99

     FEMSA Cerveza                                                                    Mexico             70.00
             Cerveceria Cuauhtemoc Moctezuma, S.A. de C.V...........................  Mexico             70.00
             Cervezas Cuauhtemoc Moctezuma, S.A. de C.V. ...........................  Mexico             70.00

     FEMSA Comercio                                                                   Mexico            100.00
             Cadena Comercial Oxxo, S.A. de C.V.....................................  Mexico            100.00
             Impulsora de Mercados de Mexico, S.A. de C.V...........................  Mexico            100.00

     FEMSA Empaques                                                                   Mexico            100.00
             Fabricas  Monterrey, S.A. de C.V.......................................  Mexico            100.00
             Grafo Regia, S.A. de C.V...............................................  Mexico            100.00
             Silices de Veracruz, S.A. de C.V.......................................  Mexico            100.00
             Vendo de Mexico, S.A. de C.V...........................................  Mexico            100.00

__________________
(1)      FEMSA owns 53.60% of the capital stock with full voting rights.
(2)      This entity was acquired on May 6, 2003.


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v K-MART CORP., et al.

Case No. CI 88-4812

Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County

February 19, 1991

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

(Names of counsel provided in preceding decision entered by the Honorable Emerson R. Thompson, Jr., on April 19, 1989).

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROM W. POWELL, Circuit Judge.

THIS CAUSE, came to be heard on various motions of STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (“DOT”) and POA ACQUISITION CORPORATION d/b/a PETERSON OUTDOOR ADVERTISING (“PETERSON”). The Court having reviewed those motions, prior orders of this Court, and trial memoranda and supplemental memoranda of the parties, and having heard argument on all issues ruled on below, hereby:

ORDERS AND ADJUDGES as follows:

1. PETERSON’s property, the billboard sign located on Parcel 103, is to be valued as a “structure” or “improvement” in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4651*et seq.*Accordingly, the outdoor advertising sign must be valued as part of the realty, prior to removal, at the greater of its fair market value or the amount which said structure contributes to the fair market value of Parcel 103.

*1122. The Court finds that the cost approach to fair market value of the billboard sign on Parcel 103 is an admissible method for valuing PETERSON’S outdoor advertising sign. Accordingly, to the extent PETERSON’S motion *in limine*seeks to exclude the cost approach to fair market value, that motion is denied.

3. The Court finds that the gross income multiplier approach to value, to which PETERSON’S expert has testified in deposition, is an admissible method for valuing PETERSON’S outdoor advertising sign, and accordingly, DOT’S motion *in limine*with respect to said method is denied.

4. The order of trial shall be as follows: first, jury will hear presentation by DOT and Defendant Spears with respect to the interests of the fee owner, after which the jury will hear presentation by DOT and PETERSON as to PETERSON’S interests. The verdict will determine the Spears and PETERSON interests separately, and the sum of the amounts so determined shall constitute the total verdict as to compensation for Parcel 103.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Orange County, Florida, this 19th day of February, 1991, *nunc pro tunc*January 24 and 29, and February 4, 1991.
#### § 293.20 Rule of construction.

To the extent that a carrier holds an effective exemption from the duty to file tariffs under this part, it shall not, unless otherwise directed by order of the Department, be subject to tariff posting, notification or subscription requirements set forth in 49 U.S.C. 41504 or 14 CFR part 221, except as provided in § 293.21.
§ 29.551 Auxiliary lifting surfaces. Each auxiliary lifting surface must be designed to withstand— ( a ) The critical flight loads in §§ 29.337 through 29.341, and 29.351;
( b ) the applicable ground loads in §§ 29.235, 29.471 through 29.485, 29.493, 29.505, and 29.521; and
( c ) Any other critical condition expected in normal operation.
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We have
issued our report dated March 11, 2008, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Innodata
Isogen, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of Innodata Isogen, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File
No. 33-85530, effective October 21, 1994, File No. 333-3464, effective
April 18, 1996, File No. 33-63085, effective September 9, 1998, File
No. 333-82185, effective July 2, 1999, and File No. 333-118506, effective
August 24, 2004) and on Forms S-3 (File No. 33-62012, effective
April 11, 1996, File No. 333-91649, effective November 24, 1999
and File No. 333-51400, effective December 7, 2000).





/s/ GRANT
THORNTON LLP





Edison,
New Jersey


March 9,
2010
```

[113th Congress Public Law 109]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 1170]]

Public Law 113-109
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
    To amend the Clean Air Act to remove the requirement for dealer 
    certification of new light-duty motor vehicles. <<NOTE: June 9, 
                          2014 -  [H.R. 724]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR DEALER CERTIFICATION OF NEW 
                              LIGHT-DUTY MOTOR VEHICLES.

    Section 207(h) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7541(h)) is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (1); and
            (2) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs 
        (1) and (2), respectively.

    Approved June 9, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 724:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113-320 (Comm. on Energy and Commerce).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 113-144 (Comm. on Environment and Public Works).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            Jan. 8, considered and passed House.
            May 22, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 36.1583 Noncomplying agricultural and fire fighting airplanes. ( a ) This section applies to propeller-driven, small airplanes that— ( 1 ) Are designed for “agricultural aircraft operations” (as defined in § 137.3 of this chapter, effective on January 1, 1966) or for dispensing fire fighting materials; and
( 2 ) Have not been shown to comply with the noise levels prescribed under appendix F of this part— ( i ) For which application is made for the original issue of a standard airworthiness certificate and that do not have any flight time before January 1, 1980; or
( ii ) For which application is made for an acoustical change approval, for airplanes which have a standard airworthiness certificate after the change in the type design, and that do not have any flight time in the changed configuration before January 1, 1980.
( b ) For airplanes covered by this section an operating limitation reading as follows must be furnished in the manner prescribed in § 36.1581:
Noise abatement: This airplane has not been shown to comply with the noise limits in FAR Part 36 and must be operated in accordance with the noise operating limitation prescribed under FAR § 91.815.
[Amdt. 36-11, 45 FR 67066, Oct. 9, 1980. Redesignated by Amdt. 36-14, 53 FR 3540, Feb. 5, 1988; Amdt. 36-18, 54 FR 34330, Aug. 18, 1989]
Placeholder: confidential business information item 

Solvay CBI Comment on 10-6-10 

For more information please contact David Donaldson by phone at 202-343-9086 or by 

email at donaldson.david@epa.gov.
§ 48.20 Eligibility for registration. A small unmanned aircraft may be registered under 49 U.S.C. 44103 and under this part only when the aircraft is not registered under the laws of a foreign country and is— ( a ) Owned by a U.S. citizen;
( b ) Owned by an individual citizen of a foreign country lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States;
( c ) Owned by a corporation not a citizen of the United States when the corporation is organized and doing business under the laws of the United States or a State within the United States, and the aircraft is based and primarily used in the United States; or
( d ) An aircraft of— ( 1 ) The United States Government; or
( 2 ) A State, the District of Columbia, a territory or possession of the United States, or a political subdivision of a State, territory, or possession.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-QSB/A
 Amendment No. 1
 þ
    
    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from  to
 Commission file number: 000-25092
 ProLink Holdings Corp.
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    86-0766246
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)410 South Benson Ln., Chandler, AZ
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    85224
(Zip Code)
 (480) 961-8800
  þ o
  o þ
  Class
    
    Outstanding at May 29, 2007Common Stock, $.0001 par value per share
    
    37,653,099
 Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one):
    
    Yes o No þ




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 3. Controls and ProceduresItem 6. ExhibitsSIGNATURESEX-31.1EX-31.2EX-32.1    Table of Contents  Explanatory Note
   
 Item 3. Controls and Procedures




---



##### Table of Contents



Item 6. Exhibits
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Title of Document
    
    Notes31.1
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    
    
    *31.2
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    
    
    *32.1
    
    Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
    
    
    **
Filed herewith




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  PROLINK HOLDINGS CORP.By:
    /s/ Lawrence D. BainLawrence D. BainPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### Douglas O. Robertson, Suing for Himself and Others, Appellant, v. John D. Schoonmaker, Jr., et al., as Executors of John D. Schoonmaker, Deceased, et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.

Submitted March 8, 1937;

decided March 16, 1937.

*599
      *Perry A. Hull*and *John W. DeWitt*for motion.

*Isadore Bookstein*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary-printing disbursements, on the ground the order is not a final order.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

IN RE:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO,

as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO, et. al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

Case No. 17-CV-01578-LTS

Case No. 17-03283

(Jointly Administered)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF OFFICIAL 

COMMITTEE OF RETIREES

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

COMES NOW, the official OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF RETIREES through its 

undersigned attorneys and most respectfully moves and advisesthe Court as follows:

1. On June 15, 2017, the US Trustee appointed for this case nine (9) individuals to 

constitute themselves as the Official Committee of Retirees (Docket No. 340).

2. On June 15, 2017, the Official Committee of Retirees conducted is first formal

meeting and at such meeting agreed unanimously to retain the services of the firm 

of Bennazar, García & Milián, CSP and the undersigned, to act as counsel for the 

committee hereafter in the above referenced cases. 

 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number listed as a bankruptcy case number due to 

software limitations and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of 

Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); and (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing 

Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:414 Filed:06/21/17 Entered:06/21/17 16:41:22 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
WHEREFORE, applicant respectfully requests to be authorized to represent appear in 

this case on behalf of the Official Committee of Retirees.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 21st day of June, 2017.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this same date, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to 

all CM/ECF participants in this case. 

BENNAZAR, GARCIA & MILIAN, C.S.P.

Counsel of the Official Committee of Retirees

/s/ A.J. Bennazar-Zequeira

A.J. Bennazar-Zequeira, USDC120907

Edificio Union Plaza, PH-A

416 Ave. Ponce de Leon

Hato Rey, Puerto Rico 00918

Telephone: (787) 754-9191

Facsimile: (787) 764-3101

ajb@bennazar.org

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:414 Filed:06/21/17 Entered:06/21/17 16:41:22 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
1 In The


### Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09

- 24

- 00234

- CR

__________________

IN RE SAMAD SEFIANE

__________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 17

- 27943

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION
In a petition asking this Court to issue a writ of mandamus, Samad Sefiane
complains that Jamie Smith, the Jefferson County District Clerk, failed to timely file

and transmit documents Sefiane filed with the District Clerk in T rial C ause N umber

17

- 27943 to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 52 ; s ee generally Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 3. We dismiss the petition.

1 Relator was convicted of aggravated family violence assault in the Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas, in Trial C ause Number 17

- 27943. See Sefiane v. State , No. 09

- 18

- 00216

- CR, 2019 WL 2439490 (Tex. A pp.

— Beaumont June 12, 2019, pet. ref ’ d) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Even though Sefiane didn ’ t certify that he served a copy of his petition for mandamus on the2 Intermediate courts of appeal do not have jurisdiction to command actions to
be taken by a district clerk unless the party making the request shows that issuing a
writ is necessary to enforce the appellate court’s jurisdiction over an appeal. See Tex.
Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a), (b). Sefiane did not do so here. Accordingly, we
dismiss Sefiane’s petitio n for lack of jurisdiction.

PETITION DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on July 23, 2024 Opinion Delivered July 24, 2024 Do Not Publish

Before Johnson , Wright and Chambers, JJ.

Respondent and the Real Party in Interest, we suspend that requirement under th e circumstances to expedite resolving the complaints that he has raised in his petition. See Tex. R. App. P. 2 (Suspension of Rules); id . 9.5(a) (Service of All Documents Required).
Order entered December 20, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00908

- CV

HARRIET NICHOLSON , Appellant

V.

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 21

- 12504

O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 19, 2022 second motion for an

extension of time to file her opening brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the

time to Ja nuary 17, 2023 . We caution appellant that further extension requests

will be disfavored.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
§ 91.123 Compliance with ATC clearances and instructions. ( a ) When an ATC clearance has been obtained, no pilot in command may deviate from that clearance unless an amended clearance is obtained, an emergency exists, or the deviation is in response to a traffic alert and collision avoidance system resolution advisory. However, except in Class A airspace, a pilot may cancel an IFR flight plan if the operation is being conducted in VFR weather conditions. When a pilot is uncertain of an ATC clearance, that pilot shall immediately request clarification from ATC.
( b ) Except in an emergency, no person may operate an aircraft contrary to an ATC instruction in an area in which air traffic control is exercised.
( c ) Each pilot in command who, in an emergency, or in response to a traffic alert and collision avoidance system resolution advisory, deviates from an ATC clearance or instruction shall notify ATC of that deviation as soon as possible.
( d ) Each pilot in command who (though not deviating from a rule of this subpart) is given priority by ATC in an emergency, shall submit a detailed report of that emergency within 48 hours to the manager of that ATC facility, if requested by ATC.
( e ) Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, no person operating an aircraft may operate that aircraft according to any clearance or instruction that has been issued to the pilot of another aircraft for radar air traffic control purposes.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2120-0005) [Doc. No. 18834, 54 FR 34294, Aug. 18, 1989, as amended by Amdt. 91-227, 56 FR 65658, Dec. 17, 1991; Amdt. 91-244, 60 FR 50679, Sept. 29, 1995]
AGREEMENT dated as of
September 1, 2008 between B+H Equimar Singapore (provider) and Straits Offshore
(recipient).

     

    B+H
Equimar Singapore has agreed to provide recipient as follows:

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              a.

            	
              Reasonable
      use of office space and conference rooms, on an as available basis upon
      reasonable notice;

            


    

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              b.

            	
              Receptionist
      services including notating of phone calls and other contacts including
      visitors;

            


    

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              c.

            	
              Clerical
      support for basic administrative
services.

            


    

     

    Recipient
agrees to pay Provider SGD 5000 monthly, in advance.

     

    Either
party may terminate this agreement upon 10 days written notice and prorate any
unearned payments.

     

    This
Agreement shall at all times be governed under the laws of the nation of
Singapore.

     

    
      
        
          
            
              	 
      
	
                      B+H
      Equimar Singapore

                    
	 
      
	 
      
	
                      Straits
      Off Shore
#### § 250.2 Applicability.

Except for § 250.7, this part applies to every carrier, as defined in § 250.1, with respect to scheduled flight segments using an aircraft that has a designed passenger capacity of 30 or more passenger seats, operating in interstate air transportation or foreign air transportation with respect to nonstop flight segments originating at a point within the United States. Section 250.7 applies to any air carrier or foreign air carrier as those terms are defined in 49 U.S.C. 40102.

[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2020-0251, 86 FR 2537, Jan. 13, 2021]