alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 27.1309 Equipment, systems, and installations. The equipment, systems, and installations whose functioning is required by this subchapter must be designed and installed to ensure that they perform their intended functions under any foreseeable operating condition. For any item of equipment or system whose failure has not been specifically addressed by another requirement in this chapter, the following requirements also apply: ( a ) The design of each item of equipment, system, and installation must be analyzed separately and in relation to other rotorcraft systems and installations to determine and identify any failure that would affect the capability of the rotorcraft or the ability of the crew to perform their duties in all operating conditions.
( b ) Each item of equipment, system, and installation must be designed and installed so that: ( 1 ) The occurrence of any catastrophic failure condition is extremely improbable;
( 2 ) The occurrence of any major failure condition is no more than improbable; and
( 3 ) For the occurrence of any other failure condition between major and catastrophic, the probability of the failure condition must be inversely proportional to its consequences.
( c ) A means to alert the crew in the event of a failure must be provided when an unsafe system operating condition exists and to enable them to take corrective action. Systems, controls, and associated monitoring and crew alerting means must be designed to minimize crew errors that could create additional hazards.
( d ) Compliance with the requirements of this section must be shown by analysis and, where necessary, by ground, flight, or simulator tests. The analysis must account for: ( 1 ) Possible modes of failure, including malfunctions and misleading data and input from external sources;
( 2 ) The effect of multiple failures and latent failures;
( 3 ) The resulting effects on the rotorcraft and occupants, considering the stage of flight and operating conditions; and
( 4 ) The crew alerting cues and the corrective action required.
[Amdt. 27-51, 88 FR 8737, Feb. 10, 2023]
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 10

1200 Sixth Avenue

Seattle, WA 981 01

March 7, 2002

Reply To

Attn Of: WCM-122

Sheila Monroe, Manager

Hazardous Waste Policy & Program Development Section.

Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Land Quality Division

811 SW Sixth Avenue

Portland, OR 97204-1390

Dear Ms. Monroe:

This letter is to confirm that the EPA.Region 10 Office of Waste and Chemicals received

ODEQ's authorization package on February 6,2002. Today, we are pleased to announce that the

Office of Waste and Chemicals Management and the Office of Regional Counsel believes the

authorization revision application to be complete. We greatly appreciate the cooperation and

perseverance of you and your staff to reach this milestone.

In accordance with the established review procedures, EPA now has 90 days to process

and publish our determination. I want you to know that the processing of this major

authorization revision application is a high priority for this office.

If you have any questions or need further information, please call me at (206) 553-2121.

Sincerely,

Lynn Williams, State Coordinator

Resource Management & State Programs Unit

Office of Waste & Chemical Management

cc. Gary Calaba

Larry Edelman

o Prtnted on Recycled Paper
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1162]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 11, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Gold Banc Corporation, Inc., Leawood, Kansas; to acquire 33.33 
percent of the voting shares of Unison Bancorp, Inc., Lenexa, Kansas, 
and thereby indirectly acquire Western National Bank, Lenexa, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 12, 
2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-1162 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### § 91.1711 Aeronautical experience.

No person may act as a pilot in command of a Mitsubishi MU-2B series airplane for the purpose of flight unless that person holds an airplane category and multi-engine land class rating, and has logged a minimum of 100 flight hours of PIC time in multi-engine airplanes.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of amendment to approved Tribal-State Compact. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA),                               ( print page 30606)                            Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish, in the                         **Federal Register**                        , notice of approved Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming on Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, has approved the Amendment to the Interim Agreement with the State of Montana and the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, which was executed on March 21, 2000.                     

# DATES:

This action is effective May 12, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George T. Skibine, Director, Office of Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240. (202) 219-4066. 

Dated: May 3, 2000.

Kevin Gover, 

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 00-11943 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
#### Fayette *vs.*Oswego C. P.

In a suit against the *maker*and *endorser*of a note, one defendant may sue out a *certiorari*without summons and severance.
OPP-r- aooy- p11.3 

oU PUN1'Eo Fir, 

IN 11 :3l 

February 15, 2010 

Jim Willis 

Director, Chemical Control Division (7405M) 

Room 4146 EPA East 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

p.1 33~r .203 

DuPont Corporate Remediation Group 

Chestnut Run Plaza, Building 715 

4417 Lancaster Pike 

Wilmington, DE 19805 

Attn: EPA Docket ID Number OPPT-2004-0113 

PFOA Site-Related Environmental Assessment Program 

Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the U.S . Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) and E. 1 . DuPont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) for a Perfluorooctanoic Acid 

(PFOA) Site-Related Environmental Assessment Program (November 3, 2005) 

Re: Replacement Figures 

Future Work Plan - Phase III DuPont Washington Works (OPPT-2004-0113 

PFOA Site Environmental Assessment Program) November 18, 2010 

Dear Mr. Willis, 

On November 18, 2010, DuPont submitted a work plan titled Future Work Plan - Phase III DuPont 

Washington Works (OPPT-2004-0113 PFOA Site Environmental Assessment Program). In the hard copy 

report, Figure 4 and Figure 5 in Appendix A [Land-Use Assessment - DuPont Washington Works 

(September 3, 2010)] are incorrect . Attached please find replacement hard copies of Figure 4 and Figure 

5 for Appendix A. Please replace the old figures with the correct figures provided here. Please note that 

the PDF of the Future Work Plan that was submitted contains the correct figures . 

Please contact me at 302-999-6197 if further information or additional discussion is needed. 

Very truly yours, 

~~/ :.~~- ` 

'41 1 

; 

- t 

b 

Andrew S . Hartten 

Project Director 

DuPont Corporate Remediation Group 

cc: Document Control, EPA (one hardcopy each of Figures 4 and 5 for Appendix A of the Future 

Work Plan) 

Laurence Libelo, EPA (two hard copies of Figures 4 and 5 for Appendix A of the Future~--Work 

Plan) 

C=J 

CONTAIN"_'3 NO CP= 

, 

(.v 

J 

E .I . du Pont de Nemours and Company 
O FN 

UZ 

N J  

G_1~J Q~ ~w 

NH 

W 

> 

I 

W 7 

J 

J J_ 

Q 

UO 

OZ 

_1 Q 

Q 

U 

019 

m 

`~ w9 ~ 

~ 

Oy 

W 

N 

rc 

2 

w 

w 

N M ' ~ 

w W O .-. U O N y _ (~ 

O N ~N W lia 

CC 

= 2 ~. 

J ~ w a w Y ~ N~- ~ a W O 

~ w ~ T 2 ~ w ~ Z < 

N oin ~~ ~o w 

w~- <°d- 3 ~ 

F a YX ~ W ~p K x f yt~ Zd 

~= Z 

UO N W ~aD ~ w VO J ~ < ~c) d o ~ N o 3 

u If <$? 

o I 

J 

I 

4 

W 

O 

~~F- C7 Y - 

Z0~ -j 

= 0 U 

< LL 

9Q Z(J 

J 

w O 

Y a_ 

t 

g 
z 

Z, W2 z 

'0 0 W 

1 1 ZW8 

W2 OR 

W. 

mw CS, 

z 0 w 'i w ~d 0 

w 

:) Q! 6~ U o 

:114- -,~ 

x , 

A 

.~, A 

W ¢ ¢ > 

W F 

N N 

W 

Z3 

N 

m a 

¢ ? 

F 

LZ 3 

3 _~ 

N 

° 

QsA d i: a 

a 

s 

4 

E 0 0 

m 

E 0 

0 m 

wvc. w.~~zai owrnu dvmuew+~mn~rzw,aw~wnrw z
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SPARTANBURG SPORTSWEAR COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 7439.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued April 25,1960.

Decided April 28, 1960.

*313Paul Elkind, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. ■Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Louis Schwartz, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., on the brief), for Petitioner.

Whiteford S. Blakeney, Charlotte, N. C. (Blakeney, Alexander & Machen, Charlotte, N. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and SOPER and HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The present phase of this proceeding was begun by the filing on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board of a petition praying that the Spartanburg Sportswear Company, its officers and agents, be adjudged in civil contempt because of their alleged disobedience of and refusal and failure to comply with the decree of this court entered on July 2, 1957. It was charged in the Board’s petition that the company and its officers committed contempt in not reinstating in good faith Louise Lindsey and Virginia Dixon, whose discharge we had previously adjudicated an unfair labor practice and whose reinstatement we had ordered. N. L. R. B. v. Spartanburg Sportswear Co., 4 Cir., 1957, 246 F.2d 366.

We referred the matter to Rufus M. Ward, Esq., of Spartanburg, South Carolina, as Special Master, who took two days of testimony and filed a comprehensive report of his findings. The Master’s conclusion was that the Board failed to meet the burden resting upon it to show by clear and convincing proof that the company had violated the decree of this court in any particular except in its failure to make payment of vacation pay to Louise Lindsey. The payment, while delayed, was, however, made before the hearings were begun before the Master. In all other respects the Master exonerated the company. In the case of Lindsey, although she was subjected to abuse by fellow employees, the Master held the evidence insufficient to base a conclusion that the employer connived at or sanctioned such mistreatment. Whatever cause she had for complaint ceased in a few weeks, and she did retain her job until recently when she left for reasons of her own unconnected with the events complained of. In the case of Dixon, who was dismissed two days after her reinstatement, the Master concluded that her unseemly and vituperative language to the plant manager warranted her dismissal. While the evidence was in conflict and there was room for opposing inferences, it was for the Master to resolve the factual questions. Under familiar principles it is our duty in such circumstances to affirm his report. N. L. R. B. v. Standard Trouser Co., 4 Cir., 1947, 162 F.2d 1012, 1014.

The Master’s report is affirmed and the petition for adjudication in civil contempt is denied.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30189-30190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11717]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Bureau of Transportation Statistics


Reports, Forms and Recordkeeping Requirements; Agency Information 
Collection Activity Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Bureau of Transportation Statistics, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 30190]]

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information 
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for extension of currently 
approved collections. The ICR describes the nature of the information 
collection and its expected burden. The Federal Register Notice with a 
60-day comment period soliciting comments on the following collection 
of information was published on January 5, 2000 [65 FR 555-557].

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 9, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bernie Stankus, (202) 366-4387, DOT, 
Office of Airline Information, Room 4125, K-25, 400 Seventh Street, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20590-0001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS)

    Title: Report of Traffic and Capacity Statistics--The T-100 System.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved Collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2138-0040.
    Form(s): BTS Schedule T-100 and Form T-100(f).
    Affected Public: Large certificated and foreign air carriers.
    Abstract: Large certificated and foreign air carriers submit BTS 
Form 41, Schedule T-100 and BTS Form T-100(f), respectively.
    These reports provide segment and on-flight traffic data. DOT uses 
the data in safety surveillance, bilateral negotiations, distribution 
of airport improvement funds, air traffic control, essential air 
service determinations, etc.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 15,084.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725--17th Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20503, Attention BTS Desk Officer.
    Comments are Invited on: whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the Department, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility 
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize 
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including 
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology. A comment to OMB is most effective if OMB 
receives it within 30 days of publication.

Donald W. Bright,
Acting Director, Office of Airline Information, Bureau of 
Transportation Statistics.
[FR Doc. 00-11717 Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-FE-M
#### § 417.127 Unique safety policies, requirements and practices.

For each launch, a launch operator must review operations, system designs, analysis, and testing, and identify any unique hazards not otherwise addressed by this part. A launch operator must implement any unique safety policy, requirement, or practice needed to protect the public from the unique hazard. A launch operator must demonstrate through the licensing process that any unique safety policy, requirement, or practice ensures the safety of the public. For any change to a unique safety policy, requirement, or practice, with the exception of a launch specific update, the launch operator must file a request for license modification as required by § 417.11. The FAA may identify and impose a unique safety policy, requirement, or practice as needed to protect the public.
#### § 415.15 Rights not conferred by launch license.

Issuance of a launch license does not relieve a licensee of its obligation to comply with all applicable requirements of law or regulation that may apply to its activities, nor does issuance confer any proprietary, property or exclusive right in the use of any federal launch range or related facilities, airspace, or outer space.
#### Tucker *and*Tucker.

An order for sale of" premises in partition will not be made unless the court are satisfied a *necessity*for such order exists. It is necessary, therefore, that the facts and circumstances be stated upon which the opinion of the commissioners is founded.

Partition of lands. In this case a report of the commissioners appointed to make partition was read, stating that the lands, &c. were so situated that partition could not be made without great prejudice to the owners, and a motion was made for a sale. The report did not state any facts upon which the opinion of the commissioners was founded.

Per Curiam.

The report should have stated the facts and circumstances upon which the opinion of the commissioners was founded, so as to enable the court to judge as to the propriety of. a sale. It is only when we are satisfied that the report is just and correct, that a rule for a sale of the- premises is authorized. 2 R. S. 323, § 38. The motion must be denied.
§ 33.99 General conduct of block tests. ( a ) Each applicant may, in making a block test, use separate engines of identical design and construction in the vibration, calibration, endurance, and operation tests, except that, if a separate engine is used for the endurance test it must be subjected to a calibration check before starting the endurance test.
( b ) Each applicant may service and make minor repairs to the engine during the block tests in accordance with the service and maintenance instructions submitted in compliance with § 33.4. If the frequency of the service is excessive, or the number of stops due to engine malfunction is excessive, or a major repair, or replacement of a part is found necessary during the block tests or as the result of findings from the teardown inspection, the engine or its parts must be subjected to any additional tests the Administrator finds necessary.
( c ) Each applicant must furnish all testing facilities, including equipment and competent personnel, to conduct the block tests.
[Doc. No. 3025, 29 FR 7453, June 10, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 33-6, 39 FR 35470, Oct. 1, 1974; Amdt. 33-9, 45 FR 60181, Sept. 11, 1980]
###### Editorial Note on Part 221

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 221.152 Method of withdrawing portion of authority conferred by power of attorney.

If a carrier desires to issue a power of attorney conferring less authority than a previous power of attorney issued in favor of the same agent, the new power of attorney shall not direct the cancellation of such previous power of attorney. In such circumstances, such previous power of attorney shall be revoked by issuing and filing a Notice of Revocation of Power of Attorney in a form acceptable to the Office of International Aviation. Such revocation notice shall include reference to the new power of attorney.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Railroad Retirement Board

Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold a meeting on May 17, 2000, 9 a.m. at the Board's meeting room on the 8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:

(1) Report on Quality Audit of Railroad Retirement Board Occupational Disability Process.

(2) Medicare Transition.

The entire meeting will be open to the public. The person to contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

Dated: May 8, 2000.

Beatrice Ezerski,

Secretary to the Board.

[FR Doc. 00-11944  Filed 5-9-00; 10:07 am]

BILLING CODE 7905-01-M