alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31996D0477 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996D0477

**96/477/EC: Council Decision of 21 March 1996 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam on trade in textile and clothing products **

*
Official Journal L 199 , 08/08/1996 P. 0001 - 0066 *

COUNCIL DECISION of 21 March 1996 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam on trade in textile and clothing products (96/477/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 113 thereof, in conjunction with Article 228 (2), first sentence,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas the Commission has negotiated on behalf of the Community an Agreement on trade in textile and clothing products with the Socialist Republic of Vietnam;

Whereas the Agreement should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement between the European Community and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam on trade in textile and clothing products is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorized to designate the person empowered to sign the Agreement on behalf of the European Community.

Article 3

The President of the Council shall give the notification provided for in Article 19 of the Agreement on behalf of the European Community.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Done at Brussels, 21 March 1996.

For the Council

The President

A. GAMBINO
§ 91.519 Passenger briefing. ( a ) Before each takeoff the pilot in command of an airplane carrying passengers shall ensure that all passengers have been orally briefed on— ( 1 ) *Smoking.* Each passenger shall be briefed on when, where, and under what conditions smoking is prohibited. This briefing shall include a statement, as appropriate, that the Federal Aviation Regulations require passenger compliance with lighted passenger information signs and no smoking placards, prohibit smoking in lavatories, and require compliance with crewmember instructions with regard to these items;
( 2 ) *Use of safety belts and shoulder harnesses.* Each passenger shall be briefed on when, where, and under what conditions it is necessary to have his or her safety belt and, if installed, his or her shoulder harness fastened about him or her. This briefing shall include a statement, as appropriate, that Federal Aviation Regulations require passenger compliance with the lighted passenger sign and/or crewmember instructions with regard to these items;
( 3 ) Location and means for opening the passenger entry door and emergency exits;
( 4 ) Location of survival equipment;
( 5 ) Ditching procedures and the use of flotation equipment required under § 91.509 for a flight over water; and
( 6 ) The normal and emergency use of oxygen equipment installed on the airplane.
( b ) The oral briefing required by paragraph (a) of this section shall be given by the pilot in command or a member of the crew, but need not be given when the pilot in command determines that the passengers are familiar with the contents of the briefing. It may be supplemented by printed cards for the use of each passenger containing— ( 1 ) A diagram of, and methods of operating, the emergency exits; and
( 2 ) Other instructions necessary for use of emergency equipment.
( c ) Each card used under paragraph (b) must be carried in convenient locations on the airplane for the use of each passenger and must contain information that is pertinent only to the type and model airplane on which it is used.
( d ) For operations under subpart K of this part, the passenger briefing requirements of § 91.1035 apply, instead of the requirements of paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section.
[Doc. No. 18334, 54 FR 34314, Aug. 18, 1989, as amended by Amdt. 91-231, 57 FR 42672, Sept. 15, 1992; Amdt. 91-280, 68 FR 54561, Sept. 17, 2003]
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause number: 01

- 1 6

- 00079

- CR

Style: Frederick Anthony Davis v. The State of Texas

Type of motion: Motion for rehearing

Part y filing motion: Appell ant

Appellant ’s motion for rehearing is denied

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ J a ne B l and

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Huddle

.

Date: May 9 , 2017
#### § 435.23 Policy review requirements and procedures.

Unless otherwise indicated in this subpart, regulations applicable to policy review and approval of the reentry of an RLV contained in part 431, subpart B of this subchapter shall apply to the policy review conducted for a license to reenter a reentry vehicle under this part.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report of Allstates  WorldCargo,
Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December  31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Craig D. Stratton, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
      Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of
      operations of the Company for the periods presented.


Dated: February 14, 2005


/s/ Craig D. Stratton
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of BindView Development Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Edward L. Pierce, Director, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Corporation.



 By      /s/ EDWARD L. PIERCE
         -----------------------------------
         Edward L. Pierce
         Director, Senior Vice President and
         Chief Financial Officer
         March 31, 2003
§ 63.20 Applications, certificates, logbooks, reports, and records; falsification, reproduction, or alteration. ( a ) No person may make or cause to be made— ( 1 ) Any fraudulent or intentionally false statement on any application for a certificate or rating under this part;
( 2 ) Any fraudulent or intentionally false entry in any logbook, record, or report that is required to be kept, made, or used, to show compliance with any requirement for any certificate or rating under this part;
( 3 ) Any reproduction, for fraudulent purpose, of any certificate or rating under this part; or
( 4 ) Any alteration of any certificate or rating under this part.
( b ) The commission by any person of an act prohibited under paragraph (a) of this section is a basis for suspending or revoking any airman or ground instructor certificate or rating held by that person.
[Doc. No. 4086, 30 FR 2196, Feb. 18, 1965]
Good afternoon. I want to thank you for the opportunity to speak today in favor of the proposed EPA 

Clean Power Plan. This effort will lead to reduced carbon emissions from power plants and open the 

door to a clean power future. 

My name is Dustin Chavez-Davis and I am an organizing representative from the Sierra Club based in 

Albuquerque NM. I am also currently serving as a member of the board of directors for the SouthWest 

Organizing Project a community based organization working toward racial and gender equality and 

social, economic and environmental justice for disenfranchised communities in the southwest. 

Today our generation faces one of humanity's greatest challenges; the threats of man-made climate 

disruption have already begun to impact our cultural and economic viability. Increased greenhouse 

gasses in our atmosphere have resulted in more intense droughts, widespread wildfires and an increase 

in extreme weather across the south western region and the rest of the planet. The EPA's new Clean 

Power Plan is a step in the right direction towards addressing our nation's dependence on fossil fuels 

and moving to a new clean energy future. 

Communities of color have often borne the brunt of harmful energy extraction and experienced the 

worst side effects of our energy production cycle. Harmful carbon and particulate pollution make air 

quality in the four corners region of New Mexico at times worse than the smog of big cities like Los 

Angeles. Stores of coal, natural gas and oil make this area a hotbed of energy extraction. This mad rush 

to mine, drill and burn off our natural resources often fails to take into account the effect on 

communities, environmental cost and effect on future generations in favor of profit and short term gain. 

In March community members in NM held a Rally for Renev,iables at PNM's shareholder meeting to 

send a clear message to New Mexico's largest public service company; our communities are ready for 

clean energy investments. We know we can power our country without polluting our precious air and 

water resources. 

SWOP has helped aid organized communities to form bucket brigades and take action to monitor the air 

quality in their neighborhoods. With industry often next door to vulnerable communities the health 

effects are often in evidence. 

A recent poll found that more than 84% of Latinos in New Mexico want PNM to increase its use of 

renewables like solar and wind. Developing more clean energy means more jobs, less pollution and 

improved public health. New Mexico is prime for the clean energy future with its abundance of sunshine 

and wind resources. These alternative energy options can provide jobs and help transition our 

dependence on a finite and dwindling fossil fuel reserve. 

We need to look at the cost of inaction and realize that our future depends on our ability to adapt to a 

changing climate and address the challenges presented from a warming planet. 

11327/1/ C1-1 ILI IS 1. 

4S-D-5- 

6)11 Len - /rue,c AP-F. 7 08 

270 -
#### MOORE v ALLIANCE (City)

Ohio Appeals, 5th Dist, Stark Co

No. 986.

Decided October 17, 1929

Mr. Milton C. Moore, Esq., Alliance, for Moore.

Mr. F. E. Hunter, Esq., Alliance, for City.

HOUCK, J.

This controversy arises out of a proper construction and interpretation of 3814 and 3824 GC.

The plaintiff contends that the assessment does not create a lien upon the lands involved in this lawsuit, until the time of the passing of the ordinance declaring the intention to pave the street along, the questioned land, by the city council.

The defendant contends that the assessment becomes a lien on the land at the time of the resolution of necessity to improve the street by the passing of such ordinance by the city., council.

The question to be determined in this case is as to when the lien for the assessment attaches. We find that the Supreme Court of Ohio has decided this question in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants, and wé refer counsel to the case of Douglas, et al. vs. The City of Cincinnati, 29 Oh. St. 165.

The rule, seems to be and the theory on which assessments are .authorized is the presumed benefit resulting to the property from the improvement, and insofar as they are made a personal charge on the owner, it is only in respect .to the property. See Sidner vs. Alexander, 31 Oh. St. 378; 17th C. C., page 631; and 7th C. C., 320.

The conclusion of the Court is that the claim of plaintiff is sound and that he is entitled to the relief prayed for in his petition.

Lemert, J, and Sheriek, J, concur.
#### Claudine Graham, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Pearlina Thompson, et al., Plaintiffs, v City of New York, Defendant, and Corona Group Home et al., *432Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Temposition Health Care, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 894]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for negligent hiring, the third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated August 27, 1998, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs payable by the appellant to the respondents.

There are triable issues of fact which require the denial of summary judgment. O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
#### § 29.757 Hull and auxiliary float strength.

The hull, and auxiliary floats if used, must withstand the water loads prescribed by § 29.519 with a rational and conservative distribution of local and distributed water pressures over the hull and float bottom.

[Amdt. 29-3, 33 FR 967, Jan. 26, 1968]
Exhibit 10.5





Summary Sheet of Employment Agreement

with Adrian Goldfarb.



Adrian Goldfarb serves as the Chief Financial Officer under a Consulting Agreement with WSR Consulting, Inc. (WSR).  Mr. Goldfarb is the president and 50% shareholder of WSR.  On July 3, 2008, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Consulting Agreement, paying WSR a monthly fee of $19,500.  Additionally, WSR was granted 650,000 non-qualified stock options and cash settled SARs in tandem, exercisable at $0.45 per share over a five-year period.  The SARs are only exercisable if the Company does not have sufficient authorized capital to permit all outstanding options and warrants to be exercised.   All of the options and SARs vest in equal increments each June 30 and December 31, subject to the Consulting Agreement remaining in effect on each applicable vesting date.  Additionally, one-half are subject to further vesting based upon Ecosphere achieving a significant milestone.
ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT  WHEREAS, IdeaEdge, Inc., a California corporation (IdeaEdge-CA), and RBW, Inc. (Finder), entered into a Finder Agreement dated as of May 31, 2007 (the Agreement);  WHEREAS, IdeaEdge-CA was acquired by IdeaEdge, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the Company) on October 16, 2007;  WHEREAS, as of October 16, 2007, Finder has introduced investors which have invested into IdeaEdge-CA under the terms of a Promissory Note Offering in the amount of $740,000, and a Private Placement of Common Stock in the amount of $1,830,000, for an aggregate amount of $2,570,000;  WHEREAS, (i) Finder has been paid the amount of $105,000 under the terms of the Agreement, (ii) IdeaEdge-CA and Finder have agreed that any fees to be paid to Finder under the Agreement shall not include the $300,000 invested to date from investors whose residence is in the states of Colorado, Missouri, Montana or Nevada, and (iii) IdeaEdge-CA and Finder agree that IdeaEdge-CA has no further obligations under the Agreement;  NOW, THEREFORE, the Company agrees to assume the obligations under the Agreement for any amounts invested into the Company after October 16, 2007 by investors introduced to the Company by Finder and compensate Finder in the amount of 10% for such investments; provided, however, the Company shall not compensate Finder for any investors who reside in states whose blue sky laws do not permit the Companys compensation of Finder as a condition of an exemption to issue the securities to the investor, and it is the obligation of Finder to confirm with the Company and its legal counsel that the laws of the state of residence of any potential investors permit the compensation of Finder.   IdeaEdge, Inc., a California RBW, Inc.: Corporation:  /s/ James Collas /s/ Robert Wheat  James Collas, CEO Robert Wheat, President  IdeaEdge, Inc., a Colorado Corporation:  /s/ James Collas ______________________________ James Collas, CEO  1
E NEY GENERAL 

OF EXAS 

~USTXN. TEXAS 78711 

CElAW'PORD C. MARTIN 

September 1, 1970 

hon. Enrique Ii. Pena 

County Attorney 

Opinion MO. M- 679 

Room 201, City-Co;;&Bldg. Re: Whether a Justice of 

El Paso, Texas the Peace who transfers 

a criminal case to 

Attention: Steve W. Simmons another Justice of the 

First Assistant Peace in the same county 

is entitled to a four 

dollar fee as provided 

in Art. 1052, Texas Code 

Dear Sir: of Criminal Procedure? 

You have asked an opinion of this office as to 

whether a Justice of the Peace on a fee basis is entitled 

to a fee for a criminal case which he has transferred 

to another court in the same county. 

Art. 1052, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, 

provides, in part, as follows: 

"Four dollars ($4) shall be paid 

to the Justice of the Peace for 

each criminal action tried and 

finally disposed of before him...." 

Art. 1052 answers your question fully. Uy the use of 

the conjunctive word, "and", the Leg~islature has made clear 

its intent that a criminal action must be first tried, 

and, in addition, must also be finally disposed of by 

the Justice of the Peace before he is entitled to collect 

the four dollar fee due him for the performance of 

these two functions. 

Utilizing the rule of construction that words in 

a statute should be construed with reference to the 

common and ordinary usage of the words, we conclude 

that the definition cf "trial" as found in Article 

1052 is well defined in Drackenrcdqe v. State, 11 S.W. 

f30 (Tex.Civ.AnP. 1881). no writ). having before i,t 

suustantially ‘the Same~StatUtory langUag6 as in Article 

1052, the court held that a county judge was not 

entitled to a fee for actions dismissed without trial. 

-3244- 
Hon. Enrique II. Pena, paqe 2 (PI- 679) 

The Court said: 

"A trial is an examination before 

a competent tribunal, according 

to the laws of the land of the 

facts put into issue for the purpose 

of determining such issue." 

Obviously, therefore, no trial is had by the justice 

court where that court transfers the case to another court 

for trial of the facts nut into issue. 

SJI~L'IARY 

__,- 

"A Justice of the Peace is npt entitled to 

dollect a fee for actions transferred or 

dismissed without trial. 43.-t. 1052, Texas 

Criminal Procedure." 

? 

Your,5 very truly, 

I 

Prepared by Bennie X. Bock, II 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

OPINIOl? Co:*lE~:ITTEE 

Kerns Taylor, Cllairman 

w . c . Allen, Co-Chairman 

William J. Craiq 

Scott Garrison 

Dunk Sullivan 

Gordon Cass 

HEADC F. GRIFFI:: 

Staff Legal Assistant 

ALFRCD T,?ALE;ER 

Executive Assistant 

iJOLA ::!IITE 

First Assistant ;;\ttorney General 

-3245-
Exhibit 31.2

                        CERTIFICATION

I, Craig D. Stratton, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q  of
Allstates WorldCargo,    Inc.;

2.    Based  on my knowledge, this report does not contain any  untrue
statement  of  a  material  fact or omit  to  state  a  material  fact
necessary  to  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect  to
the period covered by this report;

3.    Based  on  my  knowledge, the financial  statements,  and  other
financial information included in this report, fairly present  in  all
material  respects the financial condition, results of operations  and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented  in
this report;

4.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and   I   are
responsible  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls  and
procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and have:

  (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
       disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
       supervision,  to  ensure  that  material information relating to
       the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
       made  known to us by others within those  entities, particularly
       during  the  period  in  which  this  report  is  being prepared;

  (b)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's disclosure
       controls and procedures and presented in this report our
       conclusions  about the effectiveness of the  disclosure controls
       and procedures, as of the end of the period covered  by this
       report based on such evaluation; and

  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
       control  over financial reporting that occurred  during the
       registrant's   most   recent  fiscal  quarter  (the registrant's
       fourth  fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
       has  materially  affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
       affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I   have
disclosed,  based  on our most recent evaluation of  internal  control
over  financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the  audit
committee   of  the  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or   persons
performing the equivalent functions):

  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
      or   operation  of  internal  control  over  financial reporting
      which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
      registrant's ability to record, process, summarize  and report
      financial information; and

  (b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not material,  that  involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the
      registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


May 15, 2007

/s/ Craig D. Stratton
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-1222

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM268AD

737-SL-25-142 --- 11/12/10

GOODRICH 5A3307-25-389, R1--- 10/1/11

GOODRICH 5A3307-25-389 --- 11/8/10

CONCURRENT:

GOODRICH 5A3307-25-339, R4--- 10/1/11

GOODRICH 5A3307-25-339, R3 --- 5/8/09

GOODRICH 5A3307-25-339, R2 --- 3/31/04

GOODRICH 5A3307-25-339, R1 --- 9/26/03

GOODRICH 25-349 --- 9/15/04

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008