alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.7


 


 


EXTENSION
AGREEMENT


 


 


Bank of America, N.A.,


as Administrative Agent


231 South LaSalle Street


Chicago, Illinois 60604


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


The undersigned hereby
agrees to extend, effective April 3, 2003, its Commitment and the Maturity Date
under the Credit Agreement dated as of April 3, 2001, among SOURCECORP,
Incorporated (formerly known as F.Y.I., Incorporated), each of the Lenders
party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and Banc of
America Securities LLC, as sole lead arranger and sole book agent (as the same
has been amended or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit
Agreement”) for 364 days to April 1, 2006, pursuant to Section 2.1(d)
of the Credit Agreement.  Terms defined
in the Credit Agreement are used herein as therein defined.


 


This Extension Agreement
shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the law of the State of
Texas.  This Extension Agreement may be
signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the
same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same
instrument.


 


	
  BANK OF
  AMERICA, N.A.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/Steven A. Mackenzie

  
	
   

  	
  Steven A. Mackenzie

  
	
   

  	
  Vice President

  



 


 


 


 


	
  Agreed and Accepted:

  
	
   

  
	
  SOURCECORP, INCORPORATED

  
	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  	
  /s/Barry L. Edwards

  
	
  Name:

  	
  Barry L. Edwards

  
	
  Title:

  	
  EVP & CFO

  
	
   

  
	
  BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as
  Administrative Agent

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  	
  /s/Suzanne M. Paul

  
	
  Name:

  	
  Suzanne M. Paul

  
	
  Title:

  	
  Vice President
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Financial Corporation (the
        "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Donald
        F. Schenkel, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
        of the
        Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
                  Donald F. SchenkelDonald
                  F. SchenkelChairman
                  of the Board, Presidentand
                  Chief Executive OfficerMay
                  10, 2007
#### § 63.12b [Reserved]
#### P. H. HANES KNITTING COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. 41971.

Decided June 3, 1935]

*Messrs. Adrian C. Humphreys*and *Newton- E. Fox*for the plaintiff.

*Mr. J. W.*Hussey, with whom was *Mr. Assistant Attorney General Frank J. Widemcm,*for the defendant.

*608Gkeen, *Judge,*

delivered the .opinion of the court:

The defendant issued and delivered to plaintiff on August 13, 1926, a certificate which was in effect a statement of the tax account of plaintiff for the years 1918 and 1919. This certificate showed, among other things, an overassessment for the year 1918 of $35,453.38 and an overpayment for that year of $32,769.56; also that $20,177.99 and another item not now in controversy had been credited on the taxes for the year 1919 and that the balance then remaining of the overpayment of $7,229.18, together with interest thereon, was refundable. The amount thus shown to be due plaintiff was paid by a check accompanying the certificate. Plaintiff now brings this suit to recover the $20,177.99 which was applied on the taxes of 1919, the collection of which was at that time barred by the statute of limitations. Without going into detail, it may be said that it is practically conceded that plaintiff’s suit would also be barred unless it can maintain an action upon an account stated. The theory of the plaintiff is that the certificate to which reference has been made above constituted an admission on the part of defendant that $20,177.99 was due and owing and was in effect an account stated in its favor for that amount.

This court has repeatedly held that one who seeks to recover upon an account stated must take the whole account as presented and cannot select items in his favor and sue thereon as upon an account stated. Among the leading cases on this subject are *David Daube*v. *United States,*75 C. Cls. 633, affirmed 289 U. S. 367; *Leisenring*v. *United States,*78 C. Cls. 171, certiorari denied; *Consolidated Rendering Co.*v. *United States,*78 C. Cls. 766, certiorari denied. To constitute an account stated the balance must have been struck under such circumstances as to import a promise of payment on the one side and acceptance by the other. *R. H. Stearns Co.*v. *United States,*291 U. S. 54. In the instant case a balance was struck and the amount paid to plaintiff and received without objection. The result of the transaction was an account settled. *Stearns Co., supra.*

The defendant also contends that the surety bond which was given precludes recovery on the part of plaintiff but it is not necessary that we should consider this defense.

*609Our decision is controlled by the cases above cited, and following the rules laid down therein it is ordered that plaintiff’s petition be dismissed.

Whaley, *Judge;*Williams, *Judge;*LittletoN, *Judge;*and Booth, *Chief*Justice, concur.
CH

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-04261

IN THE MATTER OF:

J.D.L.,

Respondent and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to

and including September 12, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve the 

State’s response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

August 8 2022

08/08/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0261
SORROW, LOW IAN90M V. HARRIS, COi MMMMJtm gg&Ui MMBZ M ft* Tp$uPH€fi\£M7 IM WGMJk. FILED IN 14thCOURT OFAPPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS «AHfe2-22D15

CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK 

### •MC4t+* *f&XA« AvJ*S jfAflfitttli A»»<e«/v«* 3^,f<<0/^W* Ji$$& *£uei:c<*i &Vf*Nc"f CouXT (CltAk) ChfiiS Dov'el i& f?0* - 

### /3<a/?<? ee/rti-Cy &Ktdf -Cite \aj Jk& appiitUie €o%jA"i iU? <©7 * Man*** <?t>& Appe&l k*J b*#*> -£*te*} •*- **&«• /flk£*>ua4«/ Ap/a*J% 

### ^AppeMc* **'? h«s *i&i fret, it *»e± *~ X/?m # ^«d 4*'J•/ e>4*f Ue CoHfii- *to Aedeve aU clocks*fASTcdt'o/v h^-tLe oppeffa^i«wcl /<?A 4 f^«V<*vi'f, £#) >***spv#de*tts Ptfopo&d fr«etfAr§s ofAdi a*fel 

### 'Jji P/**idi'AHp $htk\'fa&&*']«t%,:'&• &Y*J'$$i--<&y:M&*&'*i%. 9# Mate**&eed% -fo he p«fA a-C Appemt -€*>& Review, AH of "the &ho*e me/A'*6#ecl /yus\m«»\\a^d docu/^^v* 

### Atevea he*£o&e a***///®*>ed, u^o^^i#*bte hyiL& #}&€tAss% tfAjk*&«>A)^tWA* 7&/*/Codi*Ti&t/cl &K$f$iecf i#'i-k* 

### 0/^fAieJ ~€floA« alt ftf*V It&Md Afpeil&AvL G&ceaiXi, Se~ iofue M&Cpudi o-£fyppe*\% l*t //ovsios , 7e*c$ /*/ VA* 

### coupes o^ 7*/*f £^«-f CM€#$7*i7tt &»d Appe//ci<L

ccrtfr v«^$£WeM>, /f-Ztr-Olo^-CZ 

### Pfe&se- -C'Vc -Co^ o.ppe//eA^ &&<lo/z_cJ /?ei//eu3 

# /^f^-J^ /

t,C,fi'/^ | fi£3ate &; f*»t&QlO*J-CA £)e<*ii C-U&;&t0pl<e/t "&&»''0*> ' Cfa<tk\

c.t.tf^ > o^3
§ 61.19 Duration of pilot and instructor certificates and privileges. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) The holder of a certificate with an expiration date may not, after that date, exercise the privileges of that certificate.
( 2 ) Except for a certificate issued with an expiration date, a pilot certificate is valid unless it is surrendered, suspended, or revoked.
( b ) *Paper student pilot certificate.* A student pilot certificate issued under this part prior to April 1, 2016 expires: ( 1 ) For student pilots who have not reached their 40th birthday, 60 calendar months after the month of the date of examination shown on the medical certificate.
( 2 ) For student pilots who have reached their 40th birthday, 24 calendar months after the month of the date of examination shown on the medical certificate.
( 3 ) For student pilots seeking a glider rating, balloon rating, or a sport pilot certificate, 60 calendar months after the month of the date issued, regardless of the person's age.
( c ) *Pilot certificates.* ( 1 ) A pilot certificate (including a student pilot certificate issued after April 1, 2016 issued under this part is issued without a specific expiration date.
( 2 ) The holder of a pilot certificate issued on the basis of a foreign pilot license may exercise the privileges of that certificate only while that person's foreign pilot license is effective.
( d ) *Flight instructor certificate.* Except as specified in § 61.197(b), a flight instructor certificate expires 24 calendar months from the month in which it was issued, renewed, or reinstated, as appropriate.
( e ) *Ground instructor certificate.* A ground instructor certificate is issued without a specific expiration date.
( f ) *Return of certificates.* The holder of any airman certificate that is issued under this part, and that has been suspended or revoked, must return that certificate to the FAA when requested to do so by the Administrator.
( g ) *Duration of pilot certificates.* Except for a temporary certificate issued under § 61.17 or a student pilot certificate issued under paragraph (b) of this section, the holder of a paper pilot certificate issued under this part may not exercise the privileges of that certificate after March 31, 2010.
[Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16298, Apr. 4, 1997, as amended by Amdt. 61-118, 73 FR 10668, Feb. 28, 2008; Amdt. 61-124, 74 FR 42547, Aug. 21, 2009; Amdt. 61-124A, 74 FR 53644, Oct. 20, 2009; Docket FAA-2010-1127, Amdt. 61-135, 81 FR 1306, Jan. 12, 2016]
CORRECTED COPY

The FAA is reissuing the letter dated July 2 nd . A correction was made to add the “What You

Should Do” section. Below is the letter that includes the change. We made the correction in

our records as of July 6, 2015.

July 2 , 2015

Mr. Randall Cottrell

Bluejireh Inc.

1533 Cypress Cove Circle

Hoover, AL 35244

Dear Mr. Cottrell:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your March 31 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0864 ),

but we are unable to process you r request any further. The information you sent does no t

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which yo u seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/ s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (a) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (a) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Ronald E. Klingle  
|Ronald E. Klingle      
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 19, 2009
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4680 

To amend the Natural Gas Act to provide that the United States district 

courts shall not have jurisdiction to condemn property in which a State 

holds any interest, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2020 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Natural Gas Act to provide that the United 

States district courts shall not have jurisdiction to condemn property in which a State holds any interest, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ending Natural Gas 

5 Companies’ Seizure of Land for Export Profits Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4680 IS

1 SEC. 2. JURISDICTION OF UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

2 COURTS OVER CERTAIN EMINENT DOMAIN 

3 PROCEEDINGS. 

4 Section 7(h) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 

5 717f(h)) is amended— 

6 (1) in the second sentence— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘situated: Provided, That 

8 the’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘situated. 

9 ‘‘(3) JURISDICTION OF UNITED STATES DIS10 TRICT COURTS.— 

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The’’; and 

12 (B) by striking ‘‘The practice’’ and insert13 ing the following: 

14 ‘‘(2) PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE.—The prac15 tice’’; 

16 (2) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘(h) When 

17 any holder’’ and inserting the following: 

18 ‘‘(h) EMINENT DOMAIN.— 

19 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—When any holder’’; and 

20 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(B) STATE PROPERTY.—The United 

22 States district courts shall not have jurisdiction 

23 to condemn property in which a State owns any 

24 interest.’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4680 IS

1 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF EMINENT DOMAIN 

2 FOR EXPORTS. 

3 Section 7(h) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 

4 717f(h)) (as amended by section 2) is amended by adding 

5 at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(4) LIMITATION ON USE OF EMINENT DOMAIN

7 FOR EXPORTS.—A holder of a certificate of public 

8 convenience and necessity may not exercise the right 

9 of eminent domain under this subsection if the 

10 project covered by the certificate is a project to be 

11 constructed substantially for the purpose of trans12 porting natural gas to an LNG terminal or to other 

13 pipelines for export from the United States to a for14 eign country.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**Certification**

 

The undersigned officer ofCapital Crossing Preferred Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies thatthe Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2002 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  This certification is provided solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 
| Date:  November 8, 2002 | By: /s/ Richard  Wayne |   |
|-------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|                    |                   |   | Richard  Wayne |
|                    |                   |   | President  (Principal Executive Officer) |
|                         |                        |        |  |  |

 

----
RIA Executive Summary 

 12/15/2011 01:47 PM 

From: Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US 

 

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>, 

Margo_Schwab@omb.eop.gov 

 

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim DeMocker/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

Bcc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US 

Cortney and Margo, 

Attached is the revised Executive Summary, as requested. 

Thank you! 

Amy Lamson 

Risk and Benefits Group 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

109 TW Alexander Dr. (C439-02) 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-4383 

Fax: (919) 541-0839 

Executive Summary_InteragencycommentsunderEO13563 12.15.11.docx
§ 1259.201 Types of Space Grant program and project awards—regular and special. ( a ) A regular Space Grant program or project award shall: ( 1 ) Be funded by NASA in an amount not to exceed 66 percent of the total cost of the Space Grant award and/or fellowship program involved; or
( 2 ) Be funded in an amount not to exceed 100 percent of its cost if the project award is funded by another Federal entity.
( b ) A special Space Grant program or project award may be funded in an amount not to exceed 100 percent of the total cost of the special project if the Administrator or designee, the Director, NASA Space Grant Program, determines that: ( 1 ) No reasonable means is available through which the applicant can meet the matching requirements for a regular Space Grant award under paragraph (a) of this section;
( 2 ) The probable benefit of such program or project outweighs the public interest in such matching requirement; and
( 3 ) The same or equivalent benefit cannot be obtained through the award of a regular Space Grant program or project award under paragraph (a) of this section or the award of a specific national need grant under section 207 of the Act.
[54 FR 19880, May 9, 1989, as amended at 82 FR 35441, July 31, 2017]
§ 91.527 Operating in icing conditions. ( a ) No pilot may take off an airplane that has frost, ice, or snow adhering to any propeller, windshield, stabilizing or control surface; to a powerplant installation; or to an airspeed, altimeter, rate of climb, or flight attitude instrument system or wing, except that takeoffs may be made with frost under the wing in the area of the fuel tanks if authorized by the FAA.
( b ) No pilot may fly under IFR into known or forecast light or moderate icing conditions, or under VFR into known light or moderate icing conditions, unless— ( 1 ) The aircraft has functioning deicing or anti-icing equipment protecting each rotor blade, propeller, windshield, wing, stabilizing or control surface, and each airspeed, altimeter, rate of climb, or flight attitude instrument system;
( 2 ) The airplane has ice protection provisions that meet section 34 of Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 23; or
( 3 ) The airplane meets transport category airplane type certification provisions, including the requirements for certification for flight in icing conditions.
( c ) Except for an airplane that has ice protection provisions that meet the requirements in section 34 of Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 23, or those for transport category airplane type certification, no pilot may fly an airplane into known or forecast severe icing conditions.
( d ) If current weather reports and briefing information relied upon by the pilot in command indicate that the forecast icing conditions that would otherwise prohibit the flight will not be encountered during the flight because of changed weather conditions since the forecast, the restrictions in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section based on forecast conditions do not apply.
[Doc. No. 18334, 54 FR 34314, Aug. 18, 1989, as amended by Amdt. 91-310, 74 FR 62696, Dec. 1, 2009]
#### § 91.821 Civil supersonic airplanes: Noise limits.

Except for Concorde airplanes having flight time before January 1, 1980, no person may operate in the United States, a civil supersonic airplane that does not comply with Stage 2 noise limits of part 36 in effect on October 13, 1977, using applicable trade-off provisions.
##### 



AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF
ARCADIA RESOURCES, INC.,
a Nevada Corporation
 ARTICLE I
OFFICES
   ARTICLE II
STOCKHOLDERS




---



##### 



Page 2 of 17




---



##### 



Page 3 of 17




---



##### 



Page 4 of 17




---



##### 



Page 5 of 17




---



##### 



Page 6 of 17




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
     Page 7 of 17




---



##### 



Page 8 of 17




---



##### 



ARTICLE IV
COMMITTEES
  Page 9 of 17




---



##### 



Page 10 of 17




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
OFFICERS
       Page 11 of 17




---



##### 



Page 12 of 17




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS
   Page 13 of 17




---



##### 



Page 14 of 17




---



##### 



ARTICLE VII
CAPITAL STOCK
    Page 15 of 17




---



##### 



ARTICLE VIII
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
     Page 16 of 17




---



##### 



ARTICLE IX
ACQUISITION OF CONTROLLING INTEREST
  ARTICLE X
AMENDMENTS
  Page 17 of 17
EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Douglas P.
Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





/s/     Douglas P. WilliamsDouglas P. Williams Chief Financial Officer August 12, 2002