alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management [AK-962-1410-00-P; F-14874-K]
 In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that a decision to issue 
                    ( print page 30129)
                    conveyance under the provisions of Sec. 14(a) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1601, 1613(a), will be issued to NANA Regional Corporation, Inc., for the village of Kiana. The lands involved are in the vicinity of Kiana, Alaska. Serial No. and land description
AcreageKateel River Meridian, AlaskaF-14874-K: T. 19 N., R. 6 W., Secs. 21, 22, 23, 27 & 28
3,200.00F-14874-K: T. 20 N., R. 9 W., Secs. 4 to 8, inclusive
3,030.66F-14874-K: T. 17 N., R. 8 W., Secs. 5 & 6
1,162.15Aggregating
7,392.81
 A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four (4) consecutive weeks, in the Arctic Sounder Newspaper. Copies of the decision may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the Bureau of Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7599 (907) 271-5960. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected by the decision, an agency of the Federal government or regional corporation, shall have until June 9, 2000 to file an appeal. However, parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in the Bureau of Land Management at the address identified above, where the requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR part 4, subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights. Nora A. Benson, Land Law Examiner, ANCSA Team Branch of 962 Adjudication.


[FR Doc. 00-11650 Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
#### PARKER v. BOARD OF COM’RS OF OKMULGEE COUNTY.

No. 28882.

May 21, 1940.

*102 P. 2d 883.*

W. C. Alley, of Okmulgee, for plaintiff in error.

George R. Inglish and B. F. Moak, both of Okmulgee, and W. E. Foster, of Henryetta, for defendant in error.

*312HURST, J.

This is a companion case to Parker v. Board of County Commissioners of Okmulgee County, 187 Okla. 308, 102 P. 2d 880, this day decided. The issues are identical, and the cases are briefed and submitted together, and questions presented are determined by the opinion in that case.

In accordance with the views therein expressed, we hold that the judgment of the trial court in the present case was correct.

Affirmed.

BAYLESS, C. J., WELCH, Y. C. J., and RILEY and CORN, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7166

GARRY L. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusMONTGOMERY E. TUCKER, Chairman; MEMBERS, VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-98-196-2) Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 3, 1998 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Garry L. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Garry L. Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his claims brought under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. Tucker , No. CA-98-196-2 (E.D. Va. July 8, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### FRAZIER v. THE STATE.

(Decided May 18, 1916.)

Appeal from Bessemer City Court.

Heard before Hon. J. C. B. GwiN.

No counsel marked for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, P. J.

There is no bill of exceptions and the record is regular, and the cause is affirmed on the authority of *Cobb v. State,*115 Ala. 18, and *Sanders v. State, infra, 70*South. 949.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Galice quadrangle, Oregon :7.5-minute series (topographic)**
 
2012 | 2014 | 2015
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28/6:42123-E 5/
Item Number:0080-G-04
CGP systemNumber: 000932661
 
February 7, 2018
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Motion of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

for a dormancy waiver of four U.S.-South Africa frequencies ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket OST-2007-29356

MOTION OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to:

Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director – Government Affairs

& Associate General Counsel Jeff Morgan Regional Director – Government Affairs DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
1212 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 842-4184 sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

July 23, 2010BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Motion of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

for a dormancy waiver of four U.S.-South Africa frequencies ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket OST-2007-29356

MOTION OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”) hereby requests extension of its dormancy waiver

for four (4) U.S.-South Africa frequencies, from August 31, 2010 to August 31, 2011.

Delta previously used these frequencies for Atlanta-Cape Town service via Dakar. Delta

has seen significant improvement in internat ional markets over the last 12 months.

However, demand is not yet sufficient for Delta to economically resume this service.

The relief sought by Delta is in the public interest because it will enable Delta to

promptly resume service to South Africa. There is currently an abundance of available

and unused South Africa frequencies. The relief sought is fully consistent with recent

dormancy waivers granted to other U.S. carriers. See, e.g. DOT action dated May 20,

2010, docket OST OST-2007-28567, granting United a 12 month dormancy waiver for

seven San Francisco-Guangzhou frequencies.

Respectfully submitted,

_________________________________ Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director, Government Affairs

& Associate General Counsel DELTA AIR LINES, INC.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of the foregoing Motion has been served this 23rd day of July, 2010, upon the following persons via email:

carl.nelson@aa.com
dan.weiss@coair.com
hkamen@coair.com
rbkeiner@crowell.com jeffrey.manley@united.com steve.morrissey@united.com howard.kass@usairways.com benjamin.slocum@usairways.com esta.rosenberg@dot.gov
info@airlineinfo.com
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of NEON Systems, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark J. Cresswell, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350, asadopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| February 14, 2005                                                    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                 |
| /s/ Mark J. Cresswell                                                |   |
|                                                                 |
| Mark J. Cresswell                                                    |
|                                                                 |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) |

 

1

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Final environmental impact statement:north Billings County allotment management plan revisions.**
 
Volumes: One | Two| Three
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.92:N 81/8
Item Number:0080-F (online)
CGP systemNumber:000931214
 
January 17, 2018
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of
one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/S/    LEO F. WELLS,
III                              
|Leo F. Wells, III Chief Executive Officer May 11, 2006



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|/S/    DOUGLAS P.
WILLIAMS                              
|Douglas P. Williams Chief Financial Officer
May 11, 2006
#### In the Matter of Albert T. Gruskin et al., Appellants, against Edward J. Flynn, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, Respondent.

(Argued October 23, 1936;

decided October 23, 1936.)

*579
      *Sidney Kansas*for appellants.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Joseph M. Mesnig*of counsel) for respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.; Lehman, J., taking no part.
###### Editorial Note on Part 380

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 380 appear at 84 FR 15940, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 380.13 Prohibition on sale of round trips with open returns.

The charter operator shall not accept any participant's payment for return transportation unless the participant has specified a particular return flight.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERDENT,
INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND
1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             786                     539
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,298                  20,935
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,674                   4,610
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,695                  38,432
<PP&E>                                          44,692                  39,980
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,096)                 (9,707)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 268,805                 241,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,375                  38,965
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,801                   1,796
<PREFERRED>                                     12,090                  12,090
<COMMON>                                            24                      21
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,057                  63,784
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   268,805                 241,213
<SALES>                                        142,607                 106,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,607                 106,441
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  132,327                 101,497
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (1)                     (8)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,369)                 (2,760)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,910                   2,176
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,964                     740
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,946                   1,436
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14                    0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13                    0.06


</TABLE>
#### HUGHES MOTOR CO. et al. v. WARNER et al.

No. 29423.

May 7, 1940.

*102 P. 2d 594.*

Butler & Rinehart, of Oklahoma City, for petitioners.

Williams, Cowan & Benedum, of Norman, and Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This is an original proceeding in this court brought by Hughes Motor Company and its insurance carrier, hereafter referred to as petitioners, to obtain a review of an award which was made by a trial commissioner in favor of Buster Warner and which petitioners appealed to the State Industrial Commission en banc. The record shows that the appeal which was taken to the commission en banc in the manner authorized by section 3, chap. 72, S. L. 1939, has not been disposed of by that tribunal and is still pending before it. The present proceeding is therefore in effect one to obtain a review of an interlocutory order. This court reviews only final orders and awards of the State Industrial Commission. McCallum & Forber v. Owens, 184 Okla. 66, 85 P. 2d 411; Marland Refining Co. v. Bivins, 135 Okla. 14, 273 P. 212. It follows from what has been said that the present proceeding in this court is premature and it becomes necessary to dismiss the same. The dismissal of this proceeding, however, shall in no way prejudice the rights of either party in the proceeding pending before the State Industrial Commission or in any proceeding which may hereafter be perfected from any final order or award made by the State Industrial Commission.

Dismissed.

WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY, HURST, DAVISON, and DANNER, JJ., concur.
#### Cooley Trading Company, Inc., Respondent, *v.*Samuel R. Goetz, Appellant.

Submitted December 4, 1936;

decided December 31, 1936.

*490
      *Frank G. Raichle*for appellant.

*E. C. Schlenker*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

• Concur: Lehman, O’Brien, Crouch and Finch, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, Ch. J., Hubbs and Loughran, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Grace Talbot, Respondent, against Claude W. Kress at al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

Submitted January 6, 1937;

decided January 26, 1937.

*513
      *H. Dudley Bierau*and *William E. Lowther*for appellants.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Roy Wiedersum*of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.

Order affirmed with costs; no opinion.

Concur: O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran and Rippey, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, Ch. J. Taking no part: Lehman and Finch, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 10, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Richard WayneRichard WaynePresident (Principal Executive Officer)Date: May 10, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Edward F. MehmEdward F. MehmTreasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
 26
§ 437.7 Scope of an experimental permit. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76726 , Sept. 19, 2024.
An experimental permit authorizes launch or reentry of a reusable suborbital rocket. The authorization includes pre- and post-flight ground operations as defined in this section. ( a ) A pre-flight ground operation includes each operation that— ( 1 ) Takes place at a U.S. launch site; and
( 2 ) Meets the following criteria: ( i ) Is closely proximate in time to flight,
( ii ) Entails critical steps preparatory to initiating flight,
( iii ) Is unique to space launch, and
( iv ) Is inherently so hazardous as to warrant the FAA's regulatory oversight.
( b ) A post-flight ground operation includes each operation necessary to return the reusable suborbital rocket to a safe condition after it lands or impacts.
Exhibit 24.2


                              KEYSPAN CORPORATION

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



     WHEREAS,  KeySpan  Corporation,  a New York  corporation  (the  "Company"),
intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an Annual Report on Form 10-K as prescribed by
said Commission  pursuant to said Act and the rules and regulations  promulgated
thereunder.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  in my capacity as a director of the Company,  I do hereby
appoint GERALD LUTERMAN, JOHN J. BISHAR, JR. and MICHAEL J. TAUNTON, and each of
them  severally,  as my  attorneys-in-fact  with power to execute in my name and
place, and in my capacity as a director of KeySpan Corporation, said Report, any
amendment  to said  Report  and  any  other  documents  required  in  connection
therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this power of attorney this 22nd day of
February, 2006.





                                                     /s/Robert J. Fani
#### Katarzyna Pasiak, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Michael Pasiak, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*International Railway Company, Respondent, Impleaded with Others.

(Argued May 25, 1936;

decided July 8, 1936.)

*415
      *Philip Halpern*and *George E. Phillies*for appellant.

*Clarence B. Runals*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.; Lehman, J., taking no part.
#### Catherine Fearon, Appellant, *v.*Charles Treanor, Respondent.

Submitted March 22, 1937;

decided March 25, 1937.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3735-1 Filed:08/03/18 Entered:08/03/18 15:42:34 Desc:

Exhibit Declaration under perjury Page 1 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3735-1 Filed:08/03/18 Entered:08/03/18 15:42:34 Desc:

Exhibit Declaration under perjury Page 2 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3735-1 Filed:08/03/18 Entered:08/03/18 15:42:34 Desc:

Exhibit Declaration under perjury Page 3 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3735-1 Filed:08/03/18 Entered:08/03/18 15:42:34 Desc:

Exhibit Declaration under perjury Page 4 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3735-1 Filed:08/03/18 Entered:08/03/18 15:42:34 Desc:

Exhibit Declaration under perjury Page 5 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3735-1 Filed:08/03/18 Entered:08/03/18 15:42:34 Desc:

Exhibit Declaration under perjury Page 6 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3735-1 Filed:08/03/18 Entered:08/03/18 15:42:34 Desc:

Exhibit Declaration under perjury Page 7 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3735-1 Filed:08/03/18 Entered:08/03/18 15:42:34 Desc:

Exhibit Declaration under perjury Page 8 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3735-1 Filed:08/03/18 Entered:08/03/18 15:42:34 Desc:

Exhibit Declaration under perjury Page 9 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3735-1 Filed:08/03/18 Entered:08/03/18 15:42:34 Desc:

Exhibit Declaration under perjury Page 10 of 11
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3735-1 Filed:08/03/18 Entered:08/03/18 15:42:34 Desc:

Exhibit Declaration under perjury Page 11 of 11
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2083
JENNIFER MAZZARELLO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED, a New Jersey corporation, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-02-3576-AMD) Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 24, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jennifer Mazzarello, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Ross Niccolini, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jennifer Mazzarello appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons as stated by the district court in its order granting the employer’s motion for summary judgment. See Mazzarello v. Lucent Tech., Inc. , No. CA-02-3576-AMD (D. Md. July 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED