alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### §§ 100.552-100.559 [Reserved]
# EUR-Lex - 31996F1023(02) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996F1023(02)

**Council Act of 27 September 1996 drawing up the Convention relating to extradition between the Member States of the European Union **

*
Official Journal C 313 , 23/10/1996 P. 0011 - 0011 *

COUNCIL ACT of 27 September 1996 drawing up the Convention relating to extradition between the Member States of the European Union (96/C 313/02)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article K.3 (2) (c) thereof,

Whereas, for the purposes of achieving the objectives of the Union, the Member States regard the improvement of extradition between the Member States of the European Union as a matter of common interest coming under the cooperation provided for in Title VI of the Treaty;

DECIDES that the Convention, including the Annex thereto, the text of which is appended hereto and which is signed today by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the Union, is hereby drawn up;

RECOMMENDS that it be adopted by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional rules.

Done at Brussels, 27 September 1996.

For the Council

The President

M. LOWRY
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 46 

To repeal the Klamath Tribe Judgment Fund Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 8, 2019 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal the Klamath Tribe Judgment Fund Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Klamath Tribe Judg5 ment Fund Repeal Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL. 

7 Public Law 89–224 (commonly known as the ‘‘Klam8 ath Tribe Judgment Fund Act’’) (79 Stat. 897) is re9 pealed. 

10 SEC. 3. DISBURSEMENT OF REMAINING FUNDS. 

11 Notwithstanding any provision of Public Law 89–224 

12 (79 Stat. 897) (as in effect on the day before the date 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 46 IS

1 of enactment of this Act) relating to the distribution or 

2 use of funds, as soon as practicable after the date of enact3 ment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall dis4 burse to the Klamath Tribe the balance of any funds that, 

5 on or before the date of enactment of this Act, were appro6 priated or deposited into the trust accounts for remaining 

7 legal fees and administration and per capita trust ac8 counts, as identified by the Secretary of the Interior, 

9 under that Act (as in effect on the day before the date 

10 of enactment of this Act). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


     Each of the undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report of Columbus McKinnon  Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31,  2007,  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  and  that
information contained in the such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated:  May 31, 2007



                                              /S/ TIMOTHY T. TEVENS
                                              ---------------------
                                              Timothy T. Tevens
                                              Chief Executive Officer



                                               /S/ KAREN L. HOWARD
                                               -------------------
                                               Karen L. Howard
                                               Chief Financial Officer



                                       45
**Exhibit
      32.1**











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Financial Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Donald F. Schenkel, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
      of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
                Donald F. SchenkelDonald
                F. SchenkelChairman
                of the Board, Presidentand
                Chief Executive OfficerNovember
                7, 2005
October 20, 2020

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

C.A. No. 19-3239

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

FRANCISCO NICHOLAS BRITO, a/k/a “Nicholas Brito,” a/k/a “Jose,” Appellant

(D.N.J No. 2:18-cr-00557-001)

Present: McKEE, BIBAS, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges

Submitted are

(1) Appellant’s motion to publish the opinion [Dkt. No. 55]; and

(2) Appellee’s response to Appellant’s motion to publish the opinion

[Dkt. No. 56]

in the above-captioned case.

Respectfully,

Clerk 

________________________________ORDER_________________________________

The foregoing motion is granted. 

By the Court,

s/Stephanos Bibas

Circuit Judge

Dated: October 29, 2020

Tmm/cc: Alison Brill, Esq.

Lisa M. Mack, Esq.

John F. Romano, Esq.

Mark E. Coyne, Esq.
S. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

y 

pp 

~ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

'14 PRoSEoe 

J.R. Stroble OCT 12 2011 

Director, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

We received your letter dated October 11, 2011, requesting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 

(EPA's) concurrence on the draft recertifcation memo the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) plans to issue 

to the Central Characterization Project (CCP) at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). This 

request is in accordance with the CBFO procedures that are intended to ensure that the Department of 

Energy's (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) site certifications correlate appropriately with EPA 

approvals for waste characterization activities at DOE transuranic (TRU) waste generator sites. 

EPA approved LANL CCP's contact-handled (CH) and remote-handled (RH) TRU waste 

characterization programs in June 2007 and February 2008, respectively (EPA Air pocket Nos. A-98- 

49, Item II-A4-88 and A-98-49, Item II-A4-96. 

Upon review of the draft recertification memo for LANL CCP, EPA determines that it appropriately 

authorizes characterization and certification of TRU contact-handled, retrievably-stored solids (S3000), 

and contact-handled, retrievably-stored debris (S5000) and Off Site Recovery Program (OSRP) sources 

packaged as newly-generated debris (S5000) waste at LANL. The EPA limitations concerning the TRU 

waste characterization program for CH and RH wastes contained in EPA's June 21, 2007 and February 

19, 2008, approval letters remain applicable and are appropriately included in Attachment 4 of your site 

recertification. We concur that the waste characterization equipment, procedures and waste streams 

encompassed in your draft recertification letter for LANL CCP agree with EPA's existing approvals at 

the site. 

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft re-certification memo for I,AN [. 

CCP. it you have any questions or concerns, please contact Ed Feltcorn (202-343-9422). 

Sincerely, 

~ 

Edward Feltcorn 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Recycled/Recyclable 

~

Printed with Soy/Canoia lnk on paper lhat 

contalns at least 50 % recycled fiber 
cc: (Electronic Distribution) 

Alton Harris, DOE HQ 

Ed Ziemianski, CBFO 

J.R. Stroble, CBFO NTP 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO NTP 

Court Fesmire, CBFO QA 

Jonathan Edwards, EPA 

Torn Peake, EPA 

Raymond Lee, EPA 

Tim Hall, NMED
Wainwright-De La Cruz1, S.E., J.Y. Takekawa1, A. Miles1, J.M. Eadie2, E.C.

Palm1, M.T. Wilson3

1USGS, WERC, San Francisco Bay Estuary Field Station, Vallejo, CA 94592

2UC Davis, Dept. Wildlife, Fish, & Cons. Bio., One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616

3UC Davis, Dept. of Avian Science, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616

susan_wainwright@usgs.gov

The Influence of Winter Habitat Use and Diet on Selenium Risks for Surf Scoters (Melanitta 

perspicillata) in the San Francisco Bay Estuary 

The San Francisco Bay (SFB) estuary is a critical wintering area for nearly half of Pacific 

Flyway surf scoters (Melanitta perspicillata); a sea duck species that has declined as much as 

60% in the past 30 to 50 years. Poor winter habitat quality may contribute to population decline 

by decreasing winter survival, compromising body condition, or causing cross-seasonal effects 

on reproduction. Scoters wintering in SFB accumulate high concentrations of selenium (Se), 

resulting in oxidative stress and low body mass, and prompting human consumption advisories. 

We studied SFB scoters to: 1) measure spatial and temporal variability of Se in scoter tissues; 2) 

examine how regional habitat use and diet influence Se concentrations; 3) evaluate the potential 

for cross-seasonal effects on reproduction. During winters 2004-2006 we radio-marked 160 

scoters to examine site fidelity and foraging areas. We collected 159 scoters, preserved 

gastrointestinal tracts for diet analysis, and measured liver Se. We satellite marked 22 SFB 

scoters to find them on breeding grounds in Canada. Liver Se ranged from 7.4 to 119 μg/g dw 

and was at concentrations associated with reproductive impairment (98% of scoters), sublethal 

effects (i.e. oxidative stress, 56%), and mortality in laboratory mallards (16%). Concentrations 

were significantly higher throughout winter in San Pablo and Suisun Bays compared to the 

Central Bay (ANOVA: F2,154=35.18, P<0.001). The Se enriched invasive clam, Corbula 

amurensis, dominated diets in Suisun (100% occurrence) and San Pablo (52% occurrence) 

through late winter. In contrast, Central Bay diets consisted of soft bodied prey items and the 

clam Venerupis philippinarum. Radiomarked scoters displayed high site fidelity and small kernel 

home ranges, providing evidence that Se was accumulated near scoter collection sites. Scoter use 

of San Pablo and Suisun Bays declined by 80% between November and March, and by late 

January most radio-marked scoters had moved to the Central Bay where their Se exposure was 

lowered. Mean Se concentrations in eggs collected from SFB scoters was 1.71 ± 0.122 μg/g dw, 

and below concentrations of concern for waterfowl.

CALFED Statement of Relevance: Our study elucidates the pathways and implications of 

selenium bioaccumulation in a declining Bay-Delta species, and thus aids in meeting Calfed 

objectives to manage, restore and protect native species.

SESSION: Species and Communities, 10/24/2008, 1:40 PM, Room 306
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4438 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4438

To amend title 5, United States Code, to protect Federal employees from 
   retaliation for the lawful use of Federal records, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 5, 2020

   Mr. Leahy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to protect Federal employees from 
   retaliation for the lawful use of Federal records, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Employee Access to 
Information Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTIONS AGAINST RETALIATION FOR LAWFUL USE OF FEDERAL 
              RECORDS BY FEDERAL EMPLOYEES.

    (a) Protection Against Retaliation.--Section 2302(b)(9) of title 5, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (D), by inserting ``or'' after the 
        semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(E) the employee or applicant for employment--
                            ``(i) making a request for information 
                        pursuant to section 552 (commonly referred to 
                        as the `Freedom of Information Act') or 
                        subsection (d) of section 552a (commonly 
                        referred to as the `Privacy Act of 1974'); or
                            ``(ii) pursuing any administrative or 
                        judicial action with respect to such request, 
                        including seeking assistance or to engage in 
                        dispute resolution, as described in section 
                        552.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Title 5.--Sections 1214, 1215(a)(3)(B), 1221, 2302, and 
        7703 of title 5, United States Code, are amended by striking 
        ``or (D)'' in each instance and inserting ``(D), or (E)''.
            (2) Whistleblower protection enhancement act of 2012.--
        Section 116(b)(1)(A) of the Whistleblower Protection 
        Enhancement Act of 2012 (31 U.S.C. 1116 note) is amended by 
        striking ``or (D)'' and inserting ``(D), or (E)''.
                                 <all>
```
#### CITY OF TUSCALOOSA v. BLAIR.

(Decided November 23, 1915.)

Appeal from Tuscaloosa County Court.

Heard before Hon. H. B. Foster.

Brown & Ward, for appellant. Clarkson & Morisette, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4654 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4654

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to require that at 
least 12 percent of amounts appropriated out of the Harbor Maintenance 
Trust Fund are used for projects on the Great Lakes Navigation System, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 22, 2020

Mr. Portman (for himself, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Durbin, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. 
     Peters, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Young, Mr. Brown, Ms. Smith, and Ms. 
  Duckworth) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to require that at 
least 12 percent of amounts appropriated out of the Harbor Maintenance 
Trust Fund are used for projects on the Great Lakes Navigation System, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Great Lakes Navigation Act of 
2020''.

SEC. 2. GREAT LAKES NAVIGATION SYSTEM.

    Section 210 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2238) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraph (4) as subparagraph 
                (A) and indenting appropriately;
                    (B) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
            ``(4) Great lakes navigation system.--''; and
                    (C) in paragraph (4) (as so designated), by adding 
                at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Requirement.--For each fiscal year, of the 
                amounts appropriated out of the Harbor Maintenance 
                Trust Fund, the Secretary shall use not less than 12 
                percent for projects that are located within the Great 
                Lakes Navigation System.''; and
            (2) in subsection (d)(1)(B)--
                    (A) by striking clause (ii);
                    (B) in clause (i), by striking ``; and'' at the end 
                and inserting a period; and
                    (C) by striking ``the Secretary shall'' in the 
                matter preceding clause (i) and all that follows 
                through ``5 percent'' in clause (i) and inserting ``the 
                Secretary shall use not less than 5 percent''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 20, 1999, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (“PERF”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Canadian Petroleum Products Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (“PERF”) intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership. 

                    On February 10, 1986, Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (“PERF”) filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 14, 1986 (51 FR 8903).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 2, 1999. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on December 2, 1999 (64 FR 67590).                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-12040  Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 383.2 Amount of penalty. Civil penalties payable to the U.S. Government for violations of Title 49, Chapters 401 through 421, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 46301(a), are as follows: ( a ) A general civil penalty of not more than $41,577 (or $1,828 for individuals or small businesses) applies to violations of statutory provisions and rules or orders issued under those provisions, other than those listed in paragraph (b) of this section (*see* 49 U.S.C. 46301(a)(1)); and
( b ) With respect to small businesses and individuals, notwithstanding the general civil penalty specified in paragraph (a) of this section, the following civil penalty limits apply: ( 1 ) A maximum civil penalty of $16,630 applies for violations of most provisions of Chapter 401, including the anti-discrimination provisions of sections 40127 (general provision), and 41705 (discrimination against the disabled) and rules and orders issued pursuant to those provisions (*see* 49 U.S.C. 46301(a)(5)(A));
( 2 ) A maximum civil penalty of $8,315 applies for violations of section 41719 and rules and orders issued pursuant to that provision (*see* 49 U.S.C. 46301(a)(5)(C)); and
( 3 ) A maximum civil penalty of $4,159 applies for violations of section 41712 or consumer protection rules or orders (*see* 49 U.S.C. 46301(a)(5)(D)).
[88 FR 89559, Dec. 28, 2023]
§ 100.603 Debts that are covered. ( a ) The procedures covered by this part generally apply to claims for payment or debts which ( 1 ) Result from certain internal management activities of the NLRB; or
( 2 ) Are referred to the NLRB for collection.
( b ) The procedures covered by this part do not apply to ( 1 ) A debt arising from, or ancillary to, any action undertaken by or on behalf of the NLRB or its General Counsel in furtherance of efforts to ensure compliance with the National Labor Relations Board Act, 29 U.S.C. 151, *et seq.,* including but not limited to actions involving the collection of monies owed for back pay and/or other monetary remedies provided for in Board orders or ancillary court proceedings. (Regulations concerning the collection of these types of debts are found in 29 CFR part 102, subparts U and V.);
( 2 ) A debt involving criminal actions of fraud, the presentation of a false claim, or misrepresentation on the part of the debtor or any other person having an interest in the claim;
( 3 ) A debt based in whole or in part on conduct in violation of the antitrust laws;
( 4 ) A debt under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;
( 5 ) A debt between Federal agencies. Federal agencies should attempt to resolve interagency claims by negotiation in accordance with Executive Order 12146 (3 CFR, 1980 Comp., pp. 409-412);
( 6 ) A debt once it becomes subject to salary offset under 5 U.S.C. 5514; or
( 7 ) A debt involving bankruptcy which is covered by Title 11 of the United States Code.
( c ) Debts involving criminal actions of fraud, false claims, misrepresentation, or which violate antitrust laws will be promptly referred to the Department of Justice. Only the Department of Justice has the authority to compromise, suspend, or terminate collection activity on such debts. However, at its discretion, the Department of Justice may return a debt to the NLRB for further handling.