alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 437.1 Scope and organization of this part. ( a ) *Scope.* This part prescribes requirements for obtaining an experimental permit. It also prescribes post-permitting requirements with which a permittee must comply to maintain its permit. Part 413 of this subchapter contains procedures for applying for an experimental permit.
( b ) *Equivalent level of safety.* Each requirement of this part applies unless the applicant or permittee clearly and convincingly demonstrates that an alternative approach provides an equivalent level of safety to the requirement of this part.
( c ) *Organization of this part.* Subpart A contains general information about an experimental permit. Subpart B contains requirements to obtain an experimental permit. Subpart C contains the safety requirements with which a permittee must comply while conducting permitted activities. Subpart D contains terms and conditions of an experimental permit.
[Doc. No. FAA-2016-6761, Amdt. No. 437-2, 83 FR 28535, June 20, 2018]
EXHIBIT 10.2





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
following Registration Statements of ALSTOM of our report dated May 23, 2002, included in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of ALSTOM for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002.





Filed on Form S-8:


Registration Statement No. 333-10658


Registration Statement No. 333-12028





Paris, France, May 23, 2002





/s/

Barbier Frinault & Autres



/s/

Deloitte Touche TohmatsuBarbier Frinault & Autres Ernst & Young Network
Gilles Puissochet





Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
•V V 

SERVED MARCH 28, 2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

RUSHMORE HELICOPTERS , INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10GL0002 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FAA No. FAA - 2010 - 0023 

SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY 

TO: 

Robert Leroy Leffert 

1427FettemianDr. 

Colorado Springs CO 80915 

At the request of the Federal Aviation Administration, 

Chris G. Zurales, Senior Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K 

2300 East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018 

Phone: (847)294-7713; Fax: (847) 294-7498 

You are hereby required to appear as follows: 

When: 

April 27,28 and 29,2011 

Where: 

Conference Room, B16, 

United States Courthouse, 515 Ninth Street, Room 244, 

Rapid City, SD 57701 

To testify in the matter captioned above. 
^ > 

Counsel for the Federal Aviation Administration shall coordinate with Respondent 

and the witness in order to minimize the incQiiyenience to the witness. The court 

will accommodate the witness' sch^did^f&llftlliSHiite his testimony. 

loodAJwn 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment-Service List 
r 

FAA Docket No. CP10GL0002 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Michael Jacob, Respondent 

President or CEO 

Rushmore Helicopters, Inc. 

24564 Highway 16/385 

Custer, SD 57730 

Chris G. Zurales, Complainant's Counsel 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 

,TEL: 847-294-7713 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2WI000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Exhibit 32.1

HORIZON HOLDING CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

The undersigned, Stewart York, in his capacities as Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary, of Inverted Paradigms Corporation do each hereby
certify that the Form 10-KSB of Inverted Paradigms Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that
the information contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inverted Paradigms Corporation

This certification is given by the undersigned solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is subject to the knowledge standard contained therein.



/s/ Stewart YorkStewart YorkChief Executive Officer, President and Secretary
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6170** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. SHERITHA J. BELLAMY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Robert G. Doumar , Senior District Judge. ( 2:12

- cr - 00062

- RGD

- DEM

- 1; 2:13

- cv - 00498

- RGD )

Submitted : June 4, 2014 Decided: June 9, 2014

Before DUNCAN and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Sheritha J. Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Anders George, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this cir cuit.2 PER CURIAM: Sheritha J. Bellamy seeks to appeal the district

cou rt’s order denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion and her motion for an amended restitution order . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificat e of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the meri ts, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional r ight. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently review ed the record and conclude that Bellamy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 71.31 Class A airspace.

The airspace descriptions contained in § 71.33 and the routes contained in subpart A of FAA Order JO 7400.11J (incorporated by reference, see § 71.1) are designated as Class A airspace within which all pilots and aircraft are subject to the rating requirements, operating rules, and equipment requirements of part 91 of this chapter.

[Doc. No. 29334, 73 FR 54495, Sept. 22, 2008, as amended by Amdt. 71-40, 73 FR 60940, Oct. 15, 2008; Amdt. 71-41, 74 FR 46490, Sept. 10, 2009; Amdt. 71-42, 75 FR 55268, Sept. 10, 2010; Amdt. 71-43, 76 FR 53329, Aug. 26, 2011; Amdt. 71-44, 77 FR 50908, Aug. 23, 2012; Amdt. 71-45, 78 FR 52848, Aug. 27, 2013; Amdt. 71-46, 79 FR 51888, Sept. 2, 2014; Amdt. 71-47, 80 FR 51937, Aug. 27, 2015; Amdt. 71-48, 81 FR 55372, Aug. 19, 2016; Amdt. 71-49, 82 FR 40068, Aug. 24, 2017; Amdt. 71-50, 83 FR 43757, Aug. 28, 2018; Amdt. 71-51, 84 FR 45652, Aug. 30, 2019; Amdt. 71-52, 85 FR 50780, Aug. 18, 2020; Amdt. No. 71-53, 86 FR 46963, Aug. 23, 2021; Docket No. FAA-2022-1022, Amdt. No. 71-54, 87 FR 54878, Sept. 8, 2022; Docket No. FAA-2023-1785; Amendment No. 71-55, 88 FR 58072, Aug. 25, 2023; Docket No. FAA-2024-2061; Amendment No. 71-56, 89 FR 68339, Aug. 26, 2024]

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

By Docket No. FAA-2024-2061; Amendment No. 71-56, 89 FR 68339, Aug. 26, 2024, § 71.31 was amended by removing the words “FAA Order JO 7400.11H” and adding, in their place, the words “FAA Order JO 7400.11J, effective Sept. 15, 2024 through Sept. 15, 2025.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT KIT LOC KLEAR , Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. GREG M ENDOZA, Gove rnor; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-15955 D.C . No. 2:12-c v-01798-SLG M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na Sharon L. Gle a son, Distric t Judge , Pre siding ** Subm itte d Se pte m

be r 23, 2014 *** B e fore : HAW K INS, W . FLETC HER , a nd R AW LINSON, C irc uit Judge s. Kit Loc k l e ar a

ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dismi ssing his a c tion c ha lle nging his term ination from his e m ploy m e nt with the Gila R ive r India n 

# FIL ED OCT 10 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The Honora

ble Sharon L. Gle a son, Unite d Stat e s Distric t Judge for the D istric t of Ala ska , sitting by de signa tion. *** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).C om

m unity De pa rtm e n t of R e h a

bilita tion a n d Supe rvision. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie wde novo que stions of sovere ign im m unity and subje c t m a tte r jurisdic tion. Orff v . Unite d State s , 358 F.3d 1137, 1142 (9th C ir. 2004). W e m ay a ffirm

on a ny ba sis supporte d by

the re c ord. Thompson v
. Paul , 547 F.3d 1055, 1058-59 (9th C ir. 2008). W e a ffirm . Although the distric t c ourt did ha ve subje c t m atte r jurisdic tion ove r Loc kle ar’ s c onstitutiona

l c la i m s, dism issa l wa s prope r be c a use Loc kle ar fa ile d to sta te c l a im s a

nd be c a u s e the tribe wa s im

m une from suit. Se e R.J

. W illiams C o. v . Fort Be lk nap Hous. Auth. , 719 F.2d 979, 982 (9th C ir. 1983) (“ [N] o a c tion unde r 42 U.S.C . § 1983 c an be m a inta ine d in fe de ra l c ourt for pe rsons a lle ging de priva tion of c onstitutiona

l rights under c olor of triba l la w. India n tribe s a re se pa ra te and distinc t sove re igntie s a nd a re not c o nstra ine d by

the provisions of the fourte e nth a

m e ndm e n t.” (inte rna l c ita tions omi tte d)). W e do not c onside r m a tte rs not spe c ific a lly an d distinc tly

ra i se d a nd a rgue d in the ope ning brie f, or a

rgum e n ts a

n d a lle g ations ra ise d for the first tim e on a ppe a l. Se e Padge tt v . W

right , 587 F.3d 983 n.2 (9th C i r. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 5 9 5 5 2
Order entered January 11, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01324-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.D.A., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-03029

ORDER

In accordance with this Court’s order dated December 17, 2018, appellant has provided 

written verification that she filed a Statement of Inability to Afford Court Costs with the District 

Clerk. Accordingly, appellant is entitled to a free record on appeal. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(f).

We ORDER Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk, and Francheska Duffey, Official 

Court Reporter for the 330th Judicial District Court, to file their respective records WITHIN 

THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre, Ms. 

Duffey, and all parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
# EUR-Lex - 31996D0093 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996D0093

**96/93/EC: Commission Decision of 12 January 1996 authorizing Sweden to maintain its national measures as regards turkey rhinotracheitis in application of Article 14 (4) of Council Directive 90/539/EEC (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 021 , 27/01/1996 P. 0072 - 0072 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 12 January 1996 authorizing Sweden to maintain its national measures as regards turkey rhinotracheitis in application of Article 14 (4) of Council Directive 90/539/EEC (Text with EEA relevance) (96/93/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/539/EEC of 15 October 1990 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in, and imports from third countries of, poultry and hatching eggs (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Sweden and Finland, and in particular Article 14 (4) thereof,

Whereas Sweden considers that its territory is free from a number of animal diseases and has submitted an application for additional trade guarantees to the Commission; whereas the applications have been examined by the Commission; whereas a more detailed examination is necessary in the case of the application relating to turkey rhinotracheitis;

Whereas it is necessary to extend the special measures which apply to trade in poultry and hatching eggs to Sweden while this examination is being carried out;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Sweden is authorized to maintain its national measures relating to turkey rhinotracheitis until 31 December 1996.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 January 1996.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 303, 31. 10. 1990, p. 6.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1: Certification of Chief Executive Officer regarding Form 10-K for year 2003
pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Specialty Trust, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nello Gonfiantini
III, Chairman of the Board, President and Secretary of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. This Certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose. /s/ Nello Gonfiantini III
    
    Dated this 29th day of March 2004Name: Nello Gonfiantini IIITitle : Chairman of the Board, President and Secretary
 113
§ 91.419 Transfer of maintenance records. Any owner or operator who sells a U.S.-registered aircraft shall transfer to the purchaser, at the time of sale, the following records of that aircraft, in plain language form or in coded form at the election of the purchaser, if the coded form provides for the preservation and retrieval of information in a manner acceptable to the Administrator: ( a ) The records specified in § 91.417(a)(2).
( b ) The records specified in § 91.417(a)(1) which are not included in the records covered by paragraph (a) of this section, except that the purchaser may permit the seller to keep physical custody of such records. However, custody of records by the seller does not relieve the purchaser of the responsibility under § 91.417(c) to make the records available for inspection by the Administrator or any authorized representative of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-62385) of Penton Media Inc. of our report dated
February 9, 2000 relating to the financial statements, which appears in the
Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
February 9, 2000 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in
this Form 10-K.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Cleveland, Ohio
March 30, 2000
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: REAPPOINTMENT TO 

COMMITTEE ON RULES OF 

EVIDENCE 

:

:

:

:

:

No. 649

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

 O R D E R

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 15

th day of September, 2014, Maureen Murphy McBride, 

Esquire, Chester County, is hereby reappointed as a member of the Committee on 

Rules of Evidence for a term of three years commencing October 1, 2014.
# U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

Nos. 06-1127, 06-1358 AROOSTOOK BAND OF MICMACS, Plaintiff, Appellee,

v . PATRICIA E. RYAN, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the Human Rights Commission of the State of Maine; WARREN C. KESSLER, in his official capacity as member of the Human Rights Commission of the State of Maine; PAUL K. VESTAL, JR., in his official capacity as member of the Human Rights Commission of the State of Maine; JAMES VARNER, in his official capacity as member of the Human Rights Commission of the State of Maine; JADINE R. O'BRIEN, in her official capacity as member of the Human Rights Commission of the State of Maine; KRISTEN L. AIELLO, in her official capacity as member of the Human Rights Commission of the

State of Maine; LISA GARDINER; TAMMY CONDON,

Defendants, Appellants, BEVERLY AYOOB, Defendant.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this court issued on April 17, 2007 is amended as follows: Cover Page, Listing of Appellants: Replace the comma between "State of Maine" and "LISA GARDINER" with a semicolon. Replace the comma between "LISA GARDINER" and "TAMMY CONDON" with a semi colon. Cover Page, Listing of Counsel, line 2: Delete all of the spaces between "Rowe, Attorney" and "General," and insert a single space. On page 8, line 3: Replace the word "section" w i t h the word"subsection."

On page 24, lines 12-13: Take the parenthetical "(internal quotation marks omitted)" and move it after the parenthetical "(quoting 25 U.S.C. § 899 (repealed 1973))." On page 39, line 2: Delete the word "be." On page 41, note 24, line 11: Delete the brackets surrounding the letter "n" in the word "[n]othing." On page 45, note 27, line 4: Replace the partially bracketed phrase "the [state Micmac Act]" with the full y bracketed phrase "[the state Micmac Act]."
§ 91.1087 Approval of aircraft simulators and other training devices. ( a ) Training courses using aircraft simulators and other training devices may be included in the program manager's training program if approved by the Administrator.
( b ) Each aircraft simulator and other training device that is used in a training course or in checks required under this subpart must meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) It must be specifically approved for— ( i ) The program manager; and
( ii ) The particular maneuver, procedure, or crewmember function involved.
( 2 ) It must maintain the performance, functional, and other characteristics that are required for approval.
( 3 ) Additionally, for aircraft simulators, it must be— ( i ) Approved for the type aircraft and, if applicable, the particular variation within type for which the training or check is being conducted; and
( ii ) Modified to conform with any modification to the aircraft being simulated that changes the performance, functional, or other characteristics required for approval.
( c ) A particular aircraft simulator or other training device may be used by more than one program manager.
( d ) In granting initial and final approval of training programs or revisions to them, the Administrator considers the training devices, methods, and procedures listed in the program manager's curriculum under § 91.1079.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6546
PAULUS IRVIN PERKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRYAN WATSON, Warden; A. P. HARVEY, Assistant Warden; OFFICER HENSLEY; A. KILBOURNE, Lieutenant; SERGEANT SCHLUBOOM; OFFICER COX; MAJOR J. COMBS; DOCTOR JONES; MS. STRAWBERRY; P. SCARBERRY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:07-cv-00526-jct-mfu) Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 20, 2008 Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paulus Irvin Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Rosalie Fessier, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Paulus Irvin Perkins appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Perkins v. Watson , No. 7:07-cv-00526-jct-mfu (W.D. Va. Mar. 26, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
#### § 431.11 Additional license terms and conditions.

The FAA may amend an RLV mission license at any time by modifying or adding license terms and conditions to ensure compliance with 51 U.S.C. Subtitle V, chapter 509, and applicable regulations.

[Doc. No. FAA-2012-0232, 77 FR 20533, Apr. 5, 2012]
April 17, 2002



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Arthur Andersen LLP, our independent public accountants, has represented to us
that their audit of the financial statements of KeySpan Corporation, included in
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001,
was subject to Arthur Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting
and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was
conducted in compliance with professional standards; and that there was
appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit and
availability of national office consultation. The availability of personnel at
foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the
audit is not relevant to this audit.


                                                      Sincerely,

                                                      /s/Gerald Luterman

                                                      Gerald Luterman
                                                      Executive Vice President &
                                                      Chief Financial Officer