alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w3wa









Exhibit 10.3(a)




AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT



This amendment made as of September 10, 2000, among Smith Barney Futures Management, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, Smith Barney Westport Futures Fund, L.P., a New York limited partnership, and
John W. Henry & Company, Inc., a Florida corporation, for the purpose of amending that certain
Management Agreement between them dated as of April 10, 1997 and most recently amended as of May
31, 2000 in order to amend the compensation paid to the Advisor for its services as advisor to the
Partnership. All capitalized terms unless specifically defined herein shall have the same meaning
as specified in the Agreement.





	1.	 	Effective October 1, 2000, the text of Section 3(a) of the Agreement shall be deleted and the
following added in its place:
	 
	 	 	In consideration of as and as compensation for all of the services to be rendered by the
Advisor to the Partnership under this Agreement, the Partnership shall pay the Advisor (i)
an incentive fee payable quarterly equal to 20% of New Trading Profits (as such term is
defined below) earned by the Advisor of the Partnership and (ii) a monthly fee for
professional management services equal to 1/6 of 1% (2% per year) of the month end Net
Assets of the Partnership allocated to the Advisor.






	2.	 	Except as specifically amended hereby, all the terms of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.
All terms and conditions related to the services to be rendered by the Advisor as expressed
in the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect after adoption of this amendment and
shall apply in full measure to the provision of such services, the sole purpose of this
amendment being to institute the change in compensation described herein.





SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT, INC.




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ David J. Vogel
 

	 	 
	Its:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	SMITH BARNEY WESTPORT FUTURES FUND, L.P.	 	 
	By: Smith Barney Futures Management, Inc.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ David J. Vogel
 

	 	 
	Its:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	JOHN W. HENRY & COMPANY, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ John W. Henry
 

	 	 
	Its:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11713]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties can 
review or obtain copies of agreements at the Washington, DC offices of 
the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, N.W., Room 962. Interested 
parties may submit comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal 
Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within 10 days of the date 
this notice appears in the Federal Register.
    Agreement No.: 011691-001.
    Title: The COSCON/KL/YMUK Mediterranean/U.S. East and Gulf Coast 
Vessel Sharing Agreement.
    Parties:
    Cosco Container Lines
    Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.
    Yangming (U.K.)Ltd.
    Synopsis: The proposed modification specifically authorized Cosco 
to subcharter space it receives from the other two parties to Zim 
Israel Navigation Company Ltd. The parties request expedited review.

    Agreement No.: 011708.
    Title: Zim/COSCON Slot Charter Agreement.
    Parties:
    Zim Israel Navigation Company Ltd.
    COSCO Container Lines Co. Ltd.
    Synopsis: The proposed Agreement would permit the parties to 
charter space to one another and enter into related cooperative 
arrangements in the trade between United States East Coast ports and 
ports in countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea and inland points 
via all of the above ports. The parties request expedited review.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: May 5, 2000.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11713 Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### METAL POLISHERS, BUFFERS, PLATERS AND HELPERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 44, AFL-CIO, Appellant, v. VIKING EQUIPMENT COMPANY, a Corporation of the State of New Jersey.

No. 13215.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 9, 1960.

Decided May 13,1960.

Richard P. Weitzman, Newark, N. J. ' (Parsonnet, Weitzman & Oransky, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for appellant.

Blaine E. Capehart, Camden, N. J. (Richards, Capehart & Wood, Camden, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.

Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff union sues the defendant asking for money damages for breach of contract, for submission of a dispute to an impartial mediator in accordance with the terms of the contract and, in a second count, for an injunction restraining defendant from entering into or continuing in effect any agreement with any labor organization other than the plaintiff for the class of employees alleged to be covered by the plaintiff’s contract. Jurisdiction of the district court is based on Section 301(a) of the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 185 (a). The district judge denied the motion for preliminary injunction and held a motion for summary judgment under consideration.

The plaintiff union had a collective bargaining contract with the defendant employer which expires by its terms on May 31, 1960 although it is to be continued from year to year unless certain required notices are given. The defendant, in December, 1959, moved its plant from East Orange, New Jersey, to Pennsauken, New Jersey. It takes the position that this move on its part brought the contract with the plaintiff union to an end since, it argues, the contract applies only to activities by the defendant in East Orange, New Jersey. The district judge accepted this view. In denying the motion for preliminary injunction he really passed on the merits of the case since, obviously, if the contract was no longer in force the plaintiff is not entitled to injunctive or any other kind of relief.

We disagree with the district judge in his interpretation of the contract. We do not think it is to be interpreted as applicable only to defendant’s activities *143in East Orange, New Jersey. And we do not think that the defendant brought it to an end by its unilateral action in moving from East Orange to Pennsauken. Since the case was decided, not upon the ground that equitable relief was not applicable, but on the ground that the plaintiff was entitled to no relief at all, we shall reverse. The case will be remanded to the district court with instructions to proceed to the consideration of the merits of the plaintiff’s claim for equitable relief and any other remedy which is requested by it for the breach of contract.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Advanstar Communications Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David W. Montgomery, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Report, and as of the end of the period covered by the Report:



|By: |  | /s/DAVID W. MONTGOMERYDavid W. Montgomery
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2003 |  | 
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This
certification is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code. This certification shall not to be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section. This certification does not constitute a part of Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A accompanying this certification and to which it is an exhibit.

---

QuickLinks
§ 91.1615 Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 79—Prohibition Against Certain Flights in the Pyongyang Flight Information Region (FIR) (ZKKP). ( a ) *Applicability.* This Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) applies to the following persons: ( 1 ) All U.S. air carriers and U.S. commercial operators;
( 2 ) All persons exercising the privileges of an airman certificate issued by the FAA, except when such persons are operating U.S.-registered aircraft for a foreign air carrier; and
( 3 ) All operators of U.S.-registered civil aircraft, except when the operator of such aircraft is a foreign air carrier.
( b ) *Flight prohibition.* Except as provided in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, no person described in paragraph (a) of this section may conduct flight operations in the Pyongyang Flight Information Region (FIR) (ZKKP).
( c ) *Permitted operations.* This section does not prohibit persons described in paragraph (a) of this section from conducting flight operations in the Pyongyang Flight Information Region (FIR) (ZKKP), provided that such flight operations are conducted under a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement with a department, agency, or instrumentality of the U.S. government (or under a subcontract between the prime contractor of the department, agency, or instrumentality and the person described in paragraph (a) of this section) with the approval of the FAA, or under an exemption issued by the FAA. The FAA will consider requests for approval or exemption in a timely manner, with the order of preference being: First, for those operations in support of U.S. government-sponsored activities; second, for those operations in support of government-sponsored activities of a foreign country with the support of a U.S. Government department, agency, or instrumentality; and third, for all other operations.
( d ) *Emergency situations.* In an emergency that requires immediate decision and action for the safety of the flight, the pilot in command of an aircraft may deviate from this section to the extent required by that emergency. Except for U.S. air carriers and commercial operators that are subject to the requirements of 14 CFR part 119, 121, 125, or 135, each person who deviates from this section must, within 10 days of the deviation, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays, submit to the responsible Flight Standards Office a complete report of the operations of the aircraft involved in the deviation, including a description of the deviation and the reasons for it.
( e ) *Expiration.* This SFAR will remain in effect until September 18, 2028. The FAA may amend, rescind, or extend this SFAR, as necessary.
[Docket No. FAA-2018-0838, Amdt. No. 91-352, 83 FR 47064, Sept. 18, 2018, as amended by Amdt. No. 91-352A, 85 FR 55377, Sept. 8, 2020; Docket No.: FAA-2018-0838; Amdt. No. 91-352B, 88 FR 63525, Sept. 15, 2023]
Unassociated Document


     

     

    USA
Real Estate Inc.

    1020
North Coach House Circle

    Wichita,
KS 67235

    


    May 11, 2009


    Stephen
Maddox

    1620 North
Coach House Circle

    Wichita,
KS 67235

    


    Mr.
Maddox:

     

    Our
auditors, Malone & Bailey, PC, are now
engaged in an examination of our financial statements. In connection therewith,
they desire to confirm the following information relating to our note payable to
you as of  December 31, 2008.   We will Use this as the
Official Note;

     

     

    
      
        	Date of note:
    	12-31-2008
	Maturity: 	No Maturity Date,
      Loan will be paid back upon approval of the officers
	Interest
    rate:	-0-
	Date to which
      interest has been paid: 	NO Interest
      Charge
	Conversion
      terms	NONE
	Amount and
      description of collateral: 	NONE
	Any direct or
      contingent liabilities to you not otherwise indicated above:	NONE


      

       

      
        	Principal balance as
      of December 31, 2006	 	$	-0-	 
	Amount loaned to us
      during the period	 	 	5,206,18	 
	Amounts repaid to
      you during the period 	 	 	-0-	 
	Amounts converted to
      equity during the period	 	 	-0-	 
	Principal balance as
      of December 31, 2007	 	$	5.206, 18	 
	Amount loaned to us
      during the period	 	 	49,039.49	 
	Amounts repaid to
      you during the period 	 	 	-0-	 
	Amounts converted to
      equity during the period	 	 	-0-	 
	Principal balance as
      of December 31, 2008	 	$	54.247.67	 


      

    

     

    Please
indicate in the space provided below whether the above is in agreement
with your records. If not,
please furnish the auditors any information
you may have which will assist them in reconciling the
difference.

     

    After
signing and dating your reply, please fax it directly to Syenny Gautama at (713)
343-3447, or mail it to VIalone & Baw, PC,
10350 Richmond, Suite 800, Houston, Texas 77042.

    


     

    Cordially,

    


    


     

    Stephen Maddox 

    President

    USAReal
Estate, Inc.


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    

    
 

    ****************************

     

    Malone
& Bailey, PC:

     

    The
foregoing information is in agreement with our records at December 31, 2008 with the following
exceptions (if any):

     

     NONE  ( Loan will be paid back after
approved by the officers of the company.)

    
      

    

       

     

    

    Signature

     

    STEPHEN
R.  MADDOX

     

           
   May 13, 
2009           

     

    Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      25,463,224
<SECURITIES>                                13,795,613
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,516,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            50,598,720
<PP&E>                                       3,305,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                 996,232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,771,936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,703,724
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        94,350
<OTHER-SE>                                  51,973,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                60,771,936
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,625,044
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,381,413
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,671,097
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                242,410
<INCOME-TAX>                                    87,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            155,410
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   155,410
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
#### §§ 435.16-431.20 [Reserved]
#### § 254.2 Applicability.

This part applies to any air carrier that provides charter or scheduled passenger service in interstate or intrastate air transportation.

[ER-1374, 49 FR 5071, Feb. 10, 1984, as amended at 64 FR 70575, Dec. 17, 1999]
#### Bartholemew *vs.*Chautauque County Bank.

ALBANY,

Feb. 1838.

An original writ like other process, is amendable.

Motion to set aside summons because tested in the third Feb. 1838. week of term, and because the *si te fecerit securum*clause was omitted. The writ was tested on the third Monday of January, 1838, returnable on the thirteenth day of January instant. The plaintiff asked leave to amend. The *right to*amend an original writ was denied.

*By the Court,*

Bronson, J.

The statute gives power to the court to amend any process in any action pending therein. The only limitation is, that process on which a defendant shall have been arrested, shall not be amended in the return day thereof. 2 R. S. 424, § 1 and 3. In *Lynch*v. *Mechanics’ Bank,*13 Johns. R. 127, it was held that an original writ was not amendable. No good reason is perceived why the above statute should not include originals as well as other process. The plaintiff, therefore, may amend the summons as to ifs *teste,*and may insert a *si te fecerit*clause on payment of the costs of this motion.
Exhibit 31.2  IDEAEDGE, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Jonathan Shultz, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of IdeaEdge, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) [Paragraph omitted]; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date: December 21, 2007/s/ Jonathan ShultzJonathan ShultzChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
United States Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

May 13,2015 

RE: Amendment to Exemption No. 11367, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0106 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

We are writing pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and the procedures 

contained in 14 C.F.R. 11, to request that ADM Crop Risk Services, Inc. ("ADMCRS"), an already FAA 

approved owner and operator of small unmanned aircraft to add another aircraft to its crop scouting 

operations. We appreciate the FAA for approving our petition to operate the DJI Phantom 2 and now 

we ask to operate the Precision Hawk Lancaster Hawkeye Mk-111 to enhance and grow our offerings to 

our customers. We see a great advantage operating this fixed wing UAS as it will add greater 

operational capabilities to our portfolio of services. We respectfully write that the FAA approve our 

request. 

Name and Address of Applicant is: 

ADM Crop Risk Services 

Attn: Brian Young, Vice President Claims Department 

350 North Water Street 

Decatur IL 62523 

Main Office 1-888-523-6277 

Fax 1-217-451-7829 

Email: byoung@admcrs.com 

Our request is similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of 

Exemption Nos. 11345 and 11274 for PrecisionHawk Inc. and USAA respectively. ADMCRS has a vested 

interest to operate and maintain these aircraft per the specifications outlined by PrecisionHawk Inc. in 

the manual. ADMCRS personnel will be trained by PrecisionHawk Inc. on how to operate and maintain 

1 
the Hawkeye Mk-111. We will operate within all of the 31 guidelines as outlined by the conditions and 

limitations section of Precision Hawk's exemption no. 11345. These would include, but are not limited 

to: 

Hawkeye Mk-111 Weight less than 55 pounds 

UAS operation not exceeded 87 knots (100 miles per hour) 

UAS operation at altitude under 400 feet above ground level 

UAS operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) 

Operations always utilizing a visual observer (VO) 

Pre-flight and post-flight inspections performed on UAS 

No operation within 5 nautical miles of an airport 

UAS operations will remain clear and give way to all manned aviation activities 

ADMCRS respectfully requests that the FAA grant its request to operate the PrecisionHawk 

Hawkeye MK-111. Thank you for your timely consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Brian Young, Vice President of Claims 

ADM Crop Risk Services 

2