alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 205.1 Purpose.

This part contains the rules for aircraft accident liability insurance coverage needed by U.S. direct air carriers to obtain or to exercise authority from the Department to operate in interstate or foreign air transportation, and by foreign direct air carriers to operate under permit or other authority in foreign air transportation. It further requires a disclosure statement to shippers about cargo liability limits and insurance coverage for U.S. and foreign direct air carriers.

[ER-1253, 46 FR 52577, Oct. 27, 1981, as amended by Doc. No. 47939, 57 FR 40100, Sept. 2, 1992; Doc. No. OST-96-1269, 61 FR 19165, May 1, 1996]
#### HOFFMAN v STATE

Ohio Appeals, 2nd Dist, Montgomery Co

Decided June 26, 1929

Strother B. Jackson, Dayton, for Hoffman.

Messrs. Ralph Hoskot and Jerome T. Miller, Dayton, for State.

ALLREAD, J.

Mrs. Hoffman, the wife of Douglas Hoffman, testified. The defendant, the plaintiff in error here, also testified. Neither Mrs. Hoffman nor Douglas deny that the officers found the whiskey, but they claim that the whiskey was in the house at the time of a previous arrest and the fine therefore covered the whiskey in controversy. However that is, it is nowhere claimed that the whiskey was taken possession of by the enforcement officers or that the former judgment covered the time in controversy here.

They also claim that the whiskey was on the premises for family use and was not intended to be sold or disposed of, This contention, however, is not a defense and there is no claim that the possession of liquor on the date in question was to be used for any lawful purpose.

We are therefore of opinion that the judgment of the Probate Court convicting the plaintiff in error, and the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas affirming that judgment, are correct.

Kunkle and Hornbeck, JJ, concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of Gateway Distributors, Ltd., a
Nevada  corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB/A No. 2 for the period ended
December  31,  2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Bailey, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 1, 2006.
                                      /s/ Richard A. Bailey
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Richard A. Bailey, Chief Executive Officer
§ 91.523 Carry-on baggage. No pilot in command of an airplane having a seating capacity of more than 19 passengers may permit a passenger to stow baggage aboard that airplane except— ( a ) In a suitable baggage or cargo storage compartment, or as provided in § 91.525; or
( b ) Under a passenger seat in such a way that it will not slide forward under crash impacts severe enough to induce the ultimate inertia forces specified in § 25.561(b)(3) of this chapter, or the requirements of the regulations under which the airplane was type certificated. Restraining devices must also limit sideward motion of under-seat baggage and be designed to withstand crash impacts severe enough to induce sideward forces specified in § 25.561(b)(3) of this chapter.
#### § 1400.735-3 Advice and counseling service.

The Director will designate a counselor for the Service on all matters relating to the conduct and responsibilities of employees, and special Government employees, under the Executive order. The counselor is responsible for providing individual employees with interpretations on questions of conflicts of interest, and other matters covered by this part. (Due to the small size of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, it is unrealistic to designate deputy counselors, and therefore, all questions concerning matters covered in this part should be directed to the one counselor appointed by the Director.)
§ 77.1 Purpose. This part establishes: ( a ) The requirements to provide notice to the FAA of certain proposed construction, or the alteration of existing structures;
( b ) The standards used to determine obstructions to air navigation, and navigational and communication facilities;
( c ) The process for aeronautical studies of obstructions to air navigation or navigational facilities to determine the effect on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace, air navigation facilities or equipment; and
( d ) The process to petition the FAA for discretionary review of determinations, revisions, and extensions of determinations.
§ 415.109 Launch description. An applicant's safety review document must contain the following information: ( a ) *Launch site description.* An applicant must identify the proposed launch site and include the following: ( 1 ) Boundaries of the launch site;
( 2 ) Launch point location, including latitude and longitude;
( 3 ) Identity of any launch site operator of that proposed site; and
( 4 ) Identification of any facilities at the launch site that will be used for launch processing and flight.
( b ) *Launch vehicle description.* An applicant must provide the following: ( 1 ) A written description of the launch vehicle. The description must include a table specifying the type and quantities of all hazardous materials on the launch vehicle and must include propellants, explosives, and toxic materials; and
( 2 ) A drawing of the launch vehicle that identifies: ( i ) Each stage, including strap-on motors;
( ii ) Physical dimensions and weight;
( iii ) Location of all safety critical systems, including any flight termination hardware, tracking aids, or telemetry systems;
( iv ) Location of all major launch vehicle control systems, propulsion systems, pressure vessels, and any other hardware that contains potential hazardous energy or hazardous material; and
( v ) For an unguided suborbital launch vehicle, the location of the rocket's center of pressure in relation to its center of gravity for the entire flight profile.
( c ) *Payload description.* An applicant must include or reference documentation previously filed with the FAA that contains the payload information required by § 415.59 for any payload or class of payload.
( d ) *Trajectory.* An applicant must provide two drawings depicting trajectory information. An applicant must file additional trajectory information as part of the flight safety analysis data required by § 415.115. ( 1 ) One drawing must depict the proposed nominal flight profile with downrange depicted on the abscissa and altitude depicted on the ordinate axis. The nominal flight profile must be labeled to show each planned staging event and its time after liftoff from launch through orbital insertion or final impact; and
( 2 ) The second drawing must depict instantaneous impact point ground traces for each of the nominal trajectory, the three-sigma left lateral trajectory and the three-sigma right lateral trajectory determined under § 417.207 of this chapter. The trajectories must be depicted on a latitude/longitude grid, and the grid must include the outlines of any continents and islands.
( e ) *Staging events.* An applicant must provide a table of nominal and ±three-sigma times for each major staging event and must describe each event, including the predicted impact point and dispersion of each spent stage.
( f ) *Vehicle performance graphs.* An applicant must provide graphs of the nominal and ±three-sigma values as a function of time after liftoff for the following launch vehicle performance parameters: thrust, altitude, velocity, instantaneous impact point arc-range measured from the launch point, and present position arc-range measured from the launch point.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4137 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4137

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize the 
 Secretary of Health and Human Services to make adjustments to payment 
  rates for skilled nursing facilities under the Medicare program to 
               account for certain unique circumstances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 1, 2020

 Mr. Schatz (for himself, Ms. Murkowski, Ms. Hirono, and Mr. Sullivan) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize the 
 Secretary of Health and Human Services to make adjustments to payment 
  rates for skilled nursing facilities under the Medicare program to 
               account for certain unique circumstances.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equitable Payments for Nursing 
Facilities Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZING THE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES TO MAKE 
              ADJUSTMENTS TO PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING 
              FACILITIES UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM TO ACCOUNT FOR 
              CERTAIN UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES.

    Section 1888(e)(4)(G) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395yy(e)(4)(G)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
clause:
                            ``(iv) Adjustment for unique 
                        circumstances.--The Secretary may provide for 
                        such adjustments as determined appropriate by 
                        the Secretary to take into account the unique 
                        circumstances of skilled nursing facilities 
                        located in Alaska or Hawaii.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of UC Hub Group, Inc., a Nevada
corporation  (the  "Company"),  on  Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31,
2005,  as  filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Larry  Wilcox, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive
Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 24, 2005.

                                 /s/ Larry Wilcox
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Larry Wilcox, Chief Financial Officer and Chief
                                 Executive Officer of UC Hub Group, Inc.


<PAGE>
#### § 102.7 Signature on documents E-Filed with the Agency.

Documents filed with the Agency by E-Filing may contain an electronic signature of the filer which will have the same legal effect, validity, and enforceability as if signed manually. The term “electronic signature” means an electronic sound, symbol, or process, attached to or logically associated with a contract or other record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the document.
#### RHOADES et v OTTAWA OIL CO

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist, Ottawa Co

No. 112.

Decided May 27, 1929

True, Crawford & True, Port Clinton,' for Rhoades, et.

Earl D. Bloom, Bowling Green, for Oil Co.

*378WILLIAMS, J.

Plaintiffs conduct an inn on said premises, but three rooms in the building are used by plaintiffs for residence purposes. There are no other provisions in the lease relating to free use of gas except these quoted, and this court is of the opinion that the defendant was required to furnish such amount of gas to plaintiffs free of charge as was necessary to light the three rooms so used.

It is therefore adjudged and decreed that the defendant at once supply to the plaintiffs free of charge gas from the well located on the premises described in the petition in reasonably sufficient quantity for heating and lighting so niuch of the house located therein as is used by plaintiffs as a family residence, towit: three rooms, and it is fux*ther ordered and adjudged that further prayer of the petition be and the same is denied.

Decree accordingly.

Lloyd and Richards, JJ, concur.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24522 Filed:06/09/23 Entered:06/12/23 17:04:58 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24522 Filed:06/09/23 Entered:06/12/23 17:04:58 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24522 Filed:06/09/23 Entered:06/12/23 17:04:58 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24522 Filed:06/09/23 Entered:06/12/23 17:04:58 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 4
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4656 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4656

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a reduction in 
  certain loan fees for certain veterans affected by major disasters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 22, 2020

  Ms. Hirono introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a reduction in 
  certain loan fees for certain veterans affected by major disasters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCING LOAN FEES FOR CERTAIN VETERANS AFFECTED BY MAJOR 
              DISASTERS.

    Section 3729(b)(4) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking subparagraph (D), and inserting the 
        following new subparagraph (D):
            ``(D)(i) The term `initial loan' means a loan to a veteran 
        guaranteed under section 3710 or made under section 3711 of 
        this title if the veteran has never obtained a loan guaranteed 
        under section 3710 or made under section 3711 of this title.
            ``(ii) If a veteran has obtained a loan guaranteed under 
        section 3710 or made under section 3711 of this title and the 
        dwelling securing such loan was substantially damaged or 
        destroyed by a major disaster declared by the President under 
        section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
        Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170), the Secretary shall 
        treat as an initial loan, as defined in clause (i), the next 
        loan the Secretary guarantees or makes to such veteran under 
        section 3710 or 3711, respectively, if--
                    ``(I) such loan is guaranteed or made before the 
                date that is three years after the date on which the 
                dwelling was substantially damaged or destroyed; and
                    ``(II) such loan is only for repairs or 
                construction, as determined by the Secretary.''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (E), by striking ``if the veteran has 
        previously obtained a loan guaranteed under section 3710 or 
        made under section 3711 of this title'' and inserting ``that is 
        not an initial loan''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT B 

Additional Interested Parties or Their Affiliates Which Paul Hastings Represents 

or Has Represented in the Past in Matters Unrelated to the Title III Cases4

Additional Interested Parties Relationship to 

Debtors 

Clients & Their Affiliates 

Fidelity and Deposit Co. of 

Maryland 

Litigation Parties Former client. Entity related to 

parent is current client. 

Dragados USA, Inc. Parties Filing Lift Stay 

Motions 

Not a client. Entities related to 

parent are former clients. 

Mercedes-Benz Financial Parties Filing Lift Stay 

Motions 

Not a client. Entities related to 

parent are former clients. 

AIG Insurance Company - 

Puerto Rico 

Parties Filing Notice of 

Appearance 

Not a client. Parent and related 

entities are current clients. 

Continental Casualty 

Company 

Parties Filing Notice of 

Appearance 

Not a client. Entities related to 

parent are former clients. 

First Pacific Advisors, LLC Parties Filing Notice of 

Appearance 

Current client. 

Western Surety Company Parties Filing Notice of 

Appearance 

Not a client. Entities related to 

parent are former clients. 

Citigroup Global Markets Inc. Professionals Current client. Parent and related 

entities are also current clients. 

Deloitte Financial Advisory 

Services 

Professionals Parent and related entities are current 

clients. 

C & A, S.E. Other Not a client. Entities related to 

parent are current clients. 

 

4

 Certain individuals – Paul Konsig, Manley, Arthur Samodovitz, and Robert Stern – have each submitted email 

correspondence to the court in connection with their holdings of COFINA bonds. See Docket No. 2294. While 

Paul Hastings does not believe that it has any connection to these individuals, the email correspondence 

submitted by these individuals does not provide sufficient identifying information to allow Paul Hastings to 

definitively determine whether it has any connections to these individuals. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:3712-2 Filed:07/27/18 Entered:07/27/18 14:46:40 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24
- 0170 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. KRISTOFFER CHARLES CARLIN,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 20 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 3 2024

10/03/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0170
#### GOODYEAR OVERLOOK REALTY CO v WM. H. EVANS BLDG & LN ASSN

Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Summit Co

No 1635.

Decided May 20, 1929

Myers & Dinsmore, Akron, for Realty Co. Rockwell & Grant, Akron, for Bldg & Ln Co.

WASHBURN, J.

While in its pleading the Realty Co. claims that there was an express contract to that effect, there is no evidence in the .record of any express contract, ,and it is frankly admitted that no express contract was made.

The trial court held that the evidence did not warrant the finding, that there was an implied contract. Nothing was said by any of the parties at any time indicating that there was any agreement whatever between the Realty Co. and the Loan Assn., and if such a contract is to be implied, it must be implied from the fact that the Loan Assn., at the request of the Realty Co., filed the two mortgages in the order indicated for the purpose of making the Loan Assn, mortgage the first lien and the Realty Co. mortgage the second lien.

We do not think that that fact, taken in connection with the knowledge the parties had of the transaction, is sufficient to establish an implied agreement, in the absence of some other communication between the parties or acts done by them indicating an intention to contract with each other.

The suggestion of a general custom in reference to transactions of this character is of no avail, for “where there is no contract, proof of usage will not make one.” “Usage or custom cannot create a contract or liability.”

Thomas v. Guarantee T. & T. Co., 81 O. S. 432.

Funk, PJ and Pardee, J, concur.
#### § 291.20 Applicability.

The rules in this subpart apply to cargo operations in interstate air transportation performed by air carriers certificated under sections 41102 or 41103 of 49 U.S.C. Subtitle VII. Section 41103 carriers that operate passenger-only or combination aircraft under section 41102, part 298 of this chapter, or other Department authority, must comply with the rules in this subpart in connection with cargo operations in interstate air transportation, whether provided on all-cargo or combination aircraft, operated pursuant to this authority or otherwise. In case a carrier may operate a particular flight under either a section 41102 certificate or a section 41103 certificate, the flight is presumed to be operated under the carrier's section 41103 authority.

[60 FR 43526, Aug. 22, 1995 as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15933, Apr. 16, 2019]