alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1176]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Experts' Meeting on High-Burnup Fuel Behavior Under Postulated 
Accident Conditions

AGENCY:  Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION:  Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a meeting to 
develop Phenomena Identification and Ranking Tables (PIRTs). PIRTs have 
been used at NRC since 1988, and they provide a structured way to 
obtain a technical understanding that is needed to address certain 
issues. About twenty of the world's best technical experts are 
participating in this activity, and the experts represent a balance 
between industry, universities, foreign researchers, and regulatory 
organizations. The current PIRT activity is addressing a postulated BWR 
accident wherein power oscillations occur, the reactor fails to scram, 
and the oscillations then reach sufficient magnitude that fuel failure 
may occur before the emergency operating procedures are able to 
terminate the oscillations and shut the reactor down.

DATES:  February 8-10, 2000, 8:30 am-5:30 pm.

ADDRESSES:  Room T10A1 (TWFN) of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Dr. Ralph Meyer, SMSAB, Division of 
Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness, Office of Nuclear 
Regulatory Research, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone (301) 415-
6789.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  The meeting agenda will be posted on the 
NRC Web site at www.nrc.gov/RES/meetings.html by February 1, 2000. The 
meeting is open to the public. Attendees will need to obtain a visitor 
badge at the TWFN building lobby.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day of January 2000.
    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Charles E. Rossi,
Director, Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness, 
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. 00-1176 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### Trustees of Special Tax School District No. 1, Leon County *et al., Appellants,*v. J. Stewart Lewis, *Appellee.*

The statutory authority of Trustees of a Special Tax School District with reference to schools in the district is of supervision only, and does not include a right to lease the school property.

Appealed from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*W. H. Mils,*for Appellants;

*F. T. Meyers,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from an order granting a temporary restraining order enjoining the use of the auditorium in a public school building in the Special Tax School District by private parties for entertainments, such as exhibitions of moving pictures, etc., under a contract made with the Trustees of the Special Tax School District.

The title to the land and the building is vested in the board of public instruction of the county, and the statutory authority of the Trustees of the Special Tax School District with reference to schools in the district is not of control, but of supervision only, and does not include a right in the Trustees to make the lease of the school property of the county involved in this controversy. No authority in the Trustees to make the lease is made to *692appear. See Special Tax School District v. Dade County Board, 61 Fla. 798, *54*South. Rep. 265.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J. and Taylor, Shackleford, Cockrell and Hocker, J. J., concur.
vARTMENTOF ,

Docke t Managemen t Facilit yji?Ki~M^^>IK''I ; ! 0F^tPATK);-1 8 •n i fF B ? 2 P ?-•

•3 2 U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n Docke t No . FAA-2012-008 9 120 0 Ne wJerse yAve . S E Wes t Buildin g Gran d Floor , Roo m W-12014 0 Washington , D

C 2059 0 Ref : Su n Countryslo t exemptio n I reques t you rconsideratio n t o allo wSu n Countryt o continu e th e LA N (Lansing , Michigan ) t o DC A (Washingto n Reaga n Nationa l Airport , DC ) direc tservice . Thi s i s th e onl ynon-sto p servic e betwee n th e stat e capita l an d th e nationa l capital . I ti s a convenient , one-per-day , 1 / i hou rflight . Th e onl y alternative s a t thi s tim e requir e i n exces s o f3 3 4 hour s wit h connectin g flight s a tmajo rhubs . Th e alternative s ar e als o mor e expensiv e tha n th e Su n Countryflights .

j^dylyrorril l 13 6 Robert s Lan e #20 2 Alexandri a V

A2231 4 Phone : 703-548-294 1
#### 125 West 45th Street Restaurant Corporation, Appellant, *v.*Framax Realty Corp., Defendant, and Barnet Klar et al., Respondents.

Argued January 14, 1937;

decided March 9, 1937.

*537
      *Joseph R. Apfel, Isadore Apfel*and *Abraham I. Last*for appellant.

*Samuel W. Dorfman*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran and Rippey, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, Ch. J. Taking no part: Finch, J.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0644

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KAITLYN DAWN POLICH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 23, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 10 2023

02/10/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0644
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 87 (Thursday, May 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11124]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EC00-46-000]


Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation, AmerGen Vermont, 
L.L.C., Vermont Electric Power Company, Inc.; Notice of Filing

April 28, 2000.
    Take notice that on February 10, 2000, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power 
Corporation, AmerGen Vermont, L.L.C., and Vermont Electric Power 
Company, Inc., tendered for filing and Amendment No. 1 to Purchase and 
Sale Agreement dated December 21, 1999.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before May 8, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11124 Filed 5-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### § 33.63 Vibration.

Each engine must be designed and constructed to function throughout its declared flight envelope and operating range of rotational speeds and power/thrust, without inducing excessive stress in any engine part because of vibration and without imparting excessive vibration forces to the aircraft structure.

[Doc. No. 28107, 61 FR 28433, June 4, 1996]
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen

,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 2, 2016 

# Order

Nov ember 2 , 2016

150643 ( 1 17 )(11 9 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

,

Plaintiff

- Appell ee
,

v

BOBAN TEMELKOSKI

,

Defendant

- Appell ant

. SC: 150643

COA: 313670 Wayne CC: 94

- 000424

- FH

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Attorney General to extend the time for filing a brief amicus curiae in support of plaintiff

- appellee is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on October 31, 2016, is accepted for filing. On further order o f the Chief Justice, the motion of the Attorney General to participate in oral argument by sharing t en minutes of plaintiff

- appellee’s allotted time for argument is GRANTED.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1 AND 32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF FIRST CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL, INC., PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SECTION 1350 OF 18 U.S.C. 63.








I, Alex Genin, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of First Capital International, Inc. hereby certify that First Capital International, Inc.'s periodic report on Form 10Q and the financial statements contained therein fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d) and that information contained in the periodic report on Form 10Q and the financial statements contained therein fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of First Capital International, Inc.








Date:  June 23, 2010
/s/ Alex GeninChief Executive Officer andActing Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

March 11, 2005

Mr. Rance L. Craft

Office of the Attorney General

P.O. Box 12548 (MC 059)

Austin, TX 78711-2548

Mr. Kevin Wayne Cole

Cole & Powell, P.C.

400 West 15th Street, Suite 304

Austin, TX 78701

Mr. Mark W. Stevens

P. O. Box 8118

Galveston, TX 77553-8118

RE:Case Number:  03-0827

Court of Appeals Number:  14-01-00529-CV

Trial Court Number:  95CV0834

Style:THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH AT GALVESTON D/B/A JOHN SEALY HOSPITAL ("UTMB")

v.

KEVIN BARRETT, M.D.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas withdrew the order denying the petition for review, issued September 10, 2004, and granted the motion for rehearing.  The enclosed per curiam opinion and judgment were issued in the above-referenced cause.  (Justice Brister not sitting)

Sincerely,

Andrew Weber, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 03-0827Page 2**
NEGLIGENCE.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

January Term, 1898.]

Cox, Swing and Smith, JJ.

#### C., H. & D. Ry. Co. v. John Shroder et al.

Electric Car Obstructed After Going upon Crossing of Railroad Track.

An electric car was obstructed upon the crossing of a railroad track, by a team of balky horses and a wagon, which could not be removed in time to prevent a railroad train from running into the electric car. *Held,*that the judge had a right to find that the electric railway company was not negligent in going upon the railroad track.

Error to the court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.

This is the case where an electric car was obstructed and stopped on the C., H. & D. tracks at Brighton, by the balking directly in front of it of a team of horses, which belonged to the street railway company and were hitched to a wagon. Before the horses could be gotten out of the way so as to permit the car to be moved, a train came round the curve and crashed into the street car Schroder was a passenger on the car, and sued both companies for $5,()U0 for injuiies. It was claimed on the part of the street railway company that the accident was unavoidable on their part, having been brought about by ail uncontrollable agency, to-wit, the two balky horses. The jury accepted this view, and returned a verdict against the steam railroad company for $225.

*Thos. L. Michie,*and *Wm. Schmidt, fr.,*for Schroder. /

*Foraker, Outcalt, Granger & Prior,*for the Street Railway Company.

*Ramsey, Maxwell & Ramsey,*for C., H. & D. R’y Co.

Swing, J.

We think the judgment in this case should be affirmed, on the ground that there was evidence sufficient before the jury to authorize it in finding that the railway company could have avoided the accident if proper care had been used, even after the street railway car had been placed in its perilous position. And we think the jury had a right to find that the street railway company was not negligent in going on the track of the C., H. & D. R’y Co.
Exhibit 10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 
 AMENDMENT TO SPECTRUM MANAGER LEASE AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT TO SPECTRUM MANAGER LEASE AGREEMENT (this “Lease Amendment”) is entered into as of October 9, 2009, by and between TerreStar 1.4 Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(“Lessor”), TerreStar Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Parent”) and One Dot Four Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Lessee”) (each a “Party”, and collectively, the
“Parties”). 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, Lessor, Parent and Lessee have executed that certain Spectrum Manager Lease Agreement, dated September 17, 2009 (the
“Lease Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, Lessor, Parent and Lessee desire to amend and modify the Lease Agreement as
provided herein; 
 WHEREAS, unless otherwise expressly provided herein, capitalized terms used herein shall have the same
meanings as designated in the Lease Agreement. 
 AGREEMENT 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, in the Lease Agreement and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Lessor, Parent and Lessee hereby amend and modify the Lease Agreement as follows: 
 1. Section 8(a). Section 8(a) of the Lease Agreement is hereby amended by deleting Section 8(a) in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following: 

“(a) The rights and obligations created under this Lease Agreement shall become effective on the date the FCC accepts
the FCC Lease Agreement Notification (“Effective Date”), provided that each Party will cooperate with the other in order to file the FCC Lease Agreement Notification under the FCC’s immediate processing procedures, and
shall continue in effect until April 23, 2017 (the “Initial Term”).” 
 2. Section 3(f).
Section 3(f) of the Lease Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the clause, “which request shall have been delivered no later than six (6) months following the Effective Date,” immediately following the clause,
“after receiving written request from Lessee therefor,”. 
  







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties hereto has duly executed this Lease Amendment as of
the date first above written. 
  

			
	PARENT
	
	TerreStar Corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Douglas Brandon

	Name:	 	Douglas Brandon
	Title:	 	General Counsel & Secretary
	
	LESSOR
	
	TerreStar 1.4 Holdings LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Vincent Loiacono

	Name:	 	Vincent Loiacono
	Title:	 	Treasurer
	
	LESSEE
	
	One Dot Four Corp.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Peter Jenson

	Name:	 	Peter Jenson
	Title:	 	Vice President
§ 375.37 Certain business aviation activities using U.S.-registered foreign civil aircraft. For purposes of this section, “company” is defined as a person that operates civil aircraft in furtherance of a business other than air transportation. U.S.-registered foreign civil aircraft that are not otherwise engaged in commercial air operations, or foreign air transportation, and which are operated by a company in the furtherance of a business other than transportation by air, when the carriage is within the scope of, and incidental to, the business of the company (other than transportation by air), may be operated to, from, and within the United States as follows: ( a ) *Intra-company operations.* A company operating a U.S.-registered foreign civil aircraft may conduct operations for a subsidiary or parent or a subsidiary of its parent on a fully-allocated cost reimbursable basis; provided, that the operator of the U.S.-registered foreign civil aircraft must hold majority ownership in, be majority owned by, or have a common parent with, the company for which it provides operations;
( b ) *Interchange operations.* A company may lease a U.S.-registered foreign civil aircraft to another company in exchange for equal time when needed on the other company's U.S. registered aircraft, where no charge, assessment, or fee is made, except that a charge may be made not to exceed the difference between the cost of owning, operating, and maintaining the two aircraft;
( c ) *Joint ownership operations.* A company that jointly owns a U.S.-registered foreign civil aircraft and furnishes the flight crew for that aircraft may collect from the other joint owners of that aircraft a share of the actual costs involved in the operation of the aircraft; and
( d ) *Time-sharing operations.* A company may lease a U.S.-registered foreign civil aircraft, with crew, to another company; provided, that the operator may collect no charge for the operation of the aircraft except reimbursement for: ( 1 ) Fuel, oil, lubricants, and other additives.
( 2 ) Travel expenses of the crew, including food, lodging, and ground transportation.
( 3 ) Hanger and tie-down costs away from the aircraft's base of operations.
( 4 ) Insurance obtained for the specific flight.
( 5 ) Landing fees, airport taxes, and similar assessments.
( 6 ) Customs, foreign permit, and similar fees directly related to the flight.
( 7 ) In flight food and beverages.
( 8 ) Passenger ground transportation.
( 9 ) Flight planning and weather contract services.
( 10 ) An additional charge equal to 100 percent of the expenses for fuel, oil, lubricants, and other additives.
[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2003-15511, 71 FR 15328, Mar. 28, 2006]
#### AMERICAN STEAM CONVEYOR CORP. v. UNITED STATES

[81 C. Cls. 151; 296 U. S. 599]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court October 14, 1935.
§ 91.167 Fuel requirements for flight in IFR conditions. ( a ) No person may operate a civil aircraft in IFR conditions unless it carries enough fuel (considering weather reports and forecasts and weather conditions) to— ( 1 ) Complete the flight to the first airport of intended landing;
( 2 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, fly from that airport to the alternate airport; and
( 3 ) Fly after that for 45 minutes at normal cruising speed or, for helicopters, fly after that for 30 minutes at normal cruising speed.
( b ) Paragraph (a)(2) of this section does not apply if: ( 1 ) Part 97 of this chapter prescribes a standard instrument approach procedure to, or a special instrument approach procedure has been issued by the Administrator to the operator for, the first airport of intended landing; and
( 2 ) Appropriate weather reports or weather forecasts, or a combination of them, indicate the following: ( i ) *For aircraft other than helicopters.* For at least 1 hour before and for 1 hour after the estimated time of arrival, the ceiling will be at least 2,000 feet above the airport elevation and the visibility will be at least 3 statute miles.
( ii ) *For helicopters.* At the estimated time of arrival and for 1 hour after the estimated time of arrival, the ceiling will be at least 1,000 feet above the airport elevation, or at least 400 feet above the lowest applicable approach minima, whichever is higher, and the visibility will be at least 2 statute miles.
[Doc. No. 98-4390, 65 FR 3546, Jan. 21, 2000]
Editorial Note on Part 47
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 47 appear at 75 FR 41979, July 20, 2010.

§ 47.43 Invalid registration. ( a ) The registration of an aircraft is invalid if, at the time it is made— ( 1 ) The aircraft is registered in a foreign country;
( 2 ) The applicant is not the owner;
( 3 ) The applicant is not qualified to submit an application under this part; or
( 4 ) The interest of the applicant in the aircraft was created by a transaction that was not entered into in good faith, but rather was made to avoid (with or without the owner's knowledge) compliance with 49 U.S.C. 44101-44104.
( b ) If the registration of an aircraft is invalid under paragraph (a) of this section, the holder of the invalid Certificate of Aircraft Registration, AC Form 8050-3, must return it as soon as possible to the Registry.
[Doc. No. 7190, 31 FR 4495, Mar. 17, 1966; 31 FR 5483, Apr. 7, 1966, as amended by Amdt. 47-20, 44 FR 61940, Oct. 29, 1979; Amdt. 47-27, 70 FR 245, Jan. 3, 2005; Amdt. 47-29, 75 FR 41982, July 20, 2010]
§ 61.213 Eligibility requirements. ( a ) To be eligible for a ground instructor certificate or rating a person must: ( 1 ) Be at least 18 years of age;
( 2 ) Be able to read, write, speak, and understand the English language. If the applicant is unable to meet one of these requirements due to medical reasons, then the Administrator may place such operating limitations on that applicant's ground instructor certificate as are necessary;
( 3 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, pass a knowledge test on the fundamentals of instructing to include— ( i ) The learning process;
( ii ) Elements of effective teaching;
( iii ) Student evaluation and testing;
( iv ) Course development;
( v ) Lesson planning; and
( vi ) Classroom training techniques.
( 4 ) Pass a knowledge test on the aeronautical knowledge areas in— ( i ) For a basic ground instructor rating §§ 61.97, 61.105, and 61.309;
( ii ) For an advanced ground instructor rating §§ 61.97, 61.105, 61.125, 61.155, and 61.309; and
( iii ) For an instrument ground instructor rating, § 61.65.
( b ) The knowledge test specified in paragraph (a)(3) of this section is not required if the applicant: ( 1 ) Holds a ground instructor certificate or flight instructor certificate issued under this part;
( 2 ) Holds a teacher's certificate issued by a State, county, city, or municipality that authorizes the person to teach at an educational level of the 7th grade or higher; or
( 3 ) Is employed as a teacher at an accredited college or university.
[Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16298, Apr. 4, 1997, as amended by Amdt. 61-110, 69 FR 44869, July 27, 2004; Amdt. 61-124, 74 FR 42562, Aug. 21, 2009]
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title 18,  United  States  Code),  I, Robert
Ellin, President and Chief Financial Officer of Amalgamated Technologies,  Inc.,
a Delaware  corporation  (the  "Company"),  do hereby certify,  to my knowledge,
that:

The Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended  September 30, 2005 (the "Form 10-QSB") of
the Company fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in the Form
10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 9, 2005

                                    /s/ Robert Ellin
                                    ----------------
                                    Robert Ellin,
                                    President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 404.13 Rulemaking. ( a ) The FAA's rulemaking procedures are located in subpart A of part 11 of this title, under the General, Written Comments, and Public Meetings and Other Proceedings headings.
( b ) In addition to the rulemaking procedures referenced in paragraph (a) of this section, the provisions of §§ 404.17 and 404.19 also apply.
[Doc. No. FAA-2016-6761, Amdt. No. 404-6, 83 FR 28534, June 20, 2018]