alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appendix H 

ACCESS ROADS IDENTIFIED FOR THE PIPELINE 

EXPANSION PROJECT

H-1 

TABLE H-1 

Access Roads Identified for the Pipeline Expansion 

ID# Road Name Type Needs 

Improvement Length (feet) MP 

25 Unnamed from Houston River Road Gravel No 1,400.0 0.1

26 Unnamed from Tillie Ledoux Road Dirt No 4,435.0 2.3

27 Unnamed Gravel No 11,500.0 2.8, 3.9

28 Buhler Station Road Paved No 2,300.0 - b

28A Unnamed from Bankens Road Dirt No 1,371.0 4.9

29 Unnamed from Holbrook Park Road Dirt No 15,199.0 6.1

30 Unnamed from Holbrook Park Road Gravel No 8,200.0 6.5

31 Unnamed from Holbrook Park Road Dirt No 4,500.0 7.2

N/A Holbrook Compressor Station Permanent Road Dirt and Gravel Yes (new) 1,500.0 8.4

32 Unnamed from Holbrook Park Road Dirt and Gravel No 6,000.0 8.5

33 Unnamed Dirt No 600.0 8.7

34 Unnamed from Camp Edgewood Rd. Dirt No 22,000.0 9.8

35 Unnamed Dirt No 1,400.0 10

36 Unnamed from Hickory Branch Road Dirt No 10,154.0 11.1

37 Unnamed from Hickory Branch Road Dirt No 3,900.0 10.9 

38 Unnamed from Camp Edgewood and Hickory 

Branch Roads Dirt No 13,800.0 11-13.8

38A Unnamed from power line access road Dirt No 109.0 11

38B Unnamed from power line access road Dirt No 67.0 11.1

38C Unnamed from power line access road Dirt No 80.0 11.3

38D Unnamed from power line access road Dirt No 121.0 11.6

38E Unnamed from power line access road Dirt No 83.0 11.8

39 Unnamed from Camp Edgewood Road Gravel No 400.0 13.2

41 Unnamed from Hwy 171 Gravel No 2,800.0 16.3

42 Unnamed from Coone Jackson Road Gravel No 800.0 17.3

43 Unnamed from Coone Jackson Road Dirt No 1,800.0 17.3

44 Unnamed from Turps Road Dirt No 7,800.0 -

 b

45 Unnamed from Turps Road Dirt No 3,600.0 18.4

46 Unnamed from Turps Road Dirt No 5,100.0 19.2

50 Texas Eastern Road Paved No - c 20.9
H-2 

TABLE H-1 

Access Roads Identified for the Pipeline Expansion – Continued 

ID# Road Name Type Needs 

Improvement Length (feet) MP 

a

 See Appendix B for locations of access roads. 

b

 AR28 and AR44 do not intersect with the right-of-way and therefore do not list a milepost. c Cameron Interstate would use the Texas Eastern Road to access the existing Williams facility which has access to 

the right-of-way; therefore, length of this road is not provided.
EXHIBIT 32 - CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (Issuer) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Richard E. Dauch, Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, and I, Michael K. Simonte, Executive Vice President - Finance & Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.








/s/ Richard E. Dauch/s/ Michael K. SimonteRichard E. DauchMichael K. SimonteCo-Founder, Chairman of the Board &Executive Vice President – Finance &Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial OfficerFebruary 9, 2011February 9, 2011
#### Esther Diamint et al., Appellants, v M.L. Burke Co., Inc., et al., Respondents. Ogden New York Services, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v Saks Fifth Avenue, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[698 NYS2d 456]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered September 1, 1998, which, *inter alia,*granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied plaintiffs’ cross motion for further discovery, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was properly granted since plaintiff was unable, in response to defendants’ prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, to demonstrate any triable issue as to whether her fall was attributable to a defective condition for which defendants had been responsible. “The mere fact that [plaintiff] fell and sustained injury [did] not constitute negligence” *(Williams v Port Auth.,*247 AD2d 296, 297). The court also correctly denied plaintiffs’ cross motion for further discovery, since it was based on nothing more than the hope that additional evidence supporting her claims would be uncovered *(see, Auerbach v Bennett,*47 NY2d 619, 636). Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.
§ 417.105 Launch personnel qualifications and certification. ( a ) *General.* A launch operator must employ a personnel certification program that documents the qualifications, including education, experience, and training, for each member of the launch crew.
( b ) *Personnel certification program.* A launch operator's personnel certification program must: ( 1 ) Conduct an annual personnel qualifications review and issue individual certifications to perform safety related tasks.
( 2 ) Revoke individual certifications for negligence or failure to satisfy certification requirements.
§ 437.31 Verification of operating area containment and key flight-safety event limitations. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76727 , Sept. 19, 2024.
( a ) An applicant must identify, describe, and provide verification evidence of the methods and systems used to meet the requirement of § 437.57(a) to contain its reusable suborbital rocket's instantaneous impact point within an operating area and outside any exclusion area. The description must include, at a minimum— ( 1 ) Proof of physical limits on the ability of the reusable suborbital rocket to leave the operating area; or
( 2 ) Abort procedures and other safety measures derived from a system safety engineering process.
( b ) An applicant must identify, describe, and provide verification evidence of the methods and systems used to meet the requirements of § 437.59 to conduct any key flight-safety event so that the reusable suborbital rocket's instantaneous impact point, including its expected dispersions, is over unpopulated or sparsely populated areas, and to conduct each reusable suborbital rocket flight so that the reentry impact point does not loiter over a populated area.
§ 27.1367 Switches. Each switch must be— ( a ) Able to carry its rated current;
( b ) Accessible to the crew; and
( c ) Labeled as to operation and the circuit controlled.
632 A.2d 162

#### Robert H. CAMPBELL v. MARYLAND REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS COMMISSION.

No. 48,

Sept. Term, 1993.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Oct. 29, 1993.

P. Tyson Bennett (Cohen, Bennett, Greene & Davis-Loomis, P.A., on brief), Annapolis, for appellant.

Elizabeth Trimble, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Kenneth W. Long, Jr., Staff Atty., on brief), Baltimore, for appellee.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, McAULIFFE, CHASANOW, KARWACKI and ROBERT M. BELL, JJ.

*478PER CURIAM.

Robert H. Campbell, the appellant, filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County against the Maryland Real Estate Appraisers Commission, the appellee. Appellee filed a preliminary motion on the ground of improper venue. After a hearing on that motion, the court agreed with appellee. An appeal was filed to the Court of Special Appeals, but before any consideration of the case by the intermediate appellate court, we issued a writ of certiorari on our own motion, 331 Md. 178, 626 A.2d 967.

After oral argument of the appeal, the appellee conceded that the venue in the subject action or any other action filed by the appellant against the appellee lies in Anne Arundel County. Accordingly, we shall vacate the judgment entered by the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County on January 7, 1993, and remand the case for further proceedings.

*JUDGMENT VACATED; CASE REMANDED TO THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS; COSTS TO BE PAID BY THE APPELLEE.*
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 14.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

     We  consent to the  reference  to our firm in the  headnote  to Item 3. Key
Information  -- Selected  Financial  Data  included in this Annual  Report (Form
20-F) of Amdocs Limited and to the  incorporation  by reference in the following
Registration Statements:

                            COMMISSION FILE NO.
                          Form S-8, No. 333-91847
                          Form S-8, No. 333-92705
                          Form S-8, No. 333-31506
                          Form S-8, No. 333-34104
                          Form S-8, No. 333-58454
                          Form S-8, No. 333-114077
                          Form S-8, No. 333-132968
                          Form S-8, No. 333-135320
                          Form S-8, No. 333-137617
                          Form S-8, No. 333-139310
                          Form S-8, No. 333-140728
            Form F-3 (and related  Prospectus),  No.  333-39278
            Form F-3 (and related  Prospectus),  No.  333-44994
            Form F-3 (and related  Prospectus),  No.  333-57036
            Form F-3 (and related Prospectus), No. 333-67572
            Form F-3 (and related  Prospectus),  No.  333-114079
            Form F-3 (and related Prospectus), No. 333-114344

of our  reports  dated  December  8,  2008,  with  respect  to the  consolidated
financial  statements and financial statement schedule of Amdocs Limited and the
effectiveness  of internal  control over financial  reporting of Amdocs Limited,
included in this Annual  Report  (Form  20-F) for the year ended  September  30,
2008.


                                                 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


New York, New York
December 8, 2008
# EUR-Lex - 31995R0839 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995R0839

**Council Regulation (EC) No 839/95 of 10 April 1995 amending the list of countries mentioned in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 519/94 **

*
Official Journal L 085 , 19/04/1995 P. 0009 - 0009 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 839/95 of 10 April 1995 amending the list of countries mentioned in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 519/94

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 113 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas Council Regulation (EC) No 519/94 of 7 March 1994 on common rules for imports from certain third countries (1), applies inter alia, to imports originating in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania;

Whereas the Community has signed Free Trade Agreements with Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, which have moreover embarked on a large-scale programme of economic reform aimed at ensuring their transition towards a market economy;

Whereas provision should be made therefore that these countries are removed from the scope of Regulation (EC) No 519/94 with effect from the entry into force of the said Agreements,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania shall be removed from Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 519/94.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply on the date of entry into force of the Free Trade Agreements concluded respectively between the countries referred to in Article 1 and the Community.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 10 April 1995.

For the Council

The President

A. JUPPÉ

(1) OJ No L 67, 10. 3. 1994, p. 89.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**ASystem for aerodynamic design and analysis of supersonic aircraft
 
pt 1|pt2 | pt 3| pt4
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.26:3351-4
Item Number:0830-H-14 (online)
CGP systemNumber:00971463
April 8, 2019
#### Nathan Seidenberg, Respondent, *v.*Meyer A. Jeneroff, Appellant.

Argued March 5, 1937;

decided March 23, 1937.

*Herbert F. Hastings, Jr., F. G. Mann*and *Everett F. Warrington*for appellant.

*John H. Broderick*and *Morris Simon*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Bubbs Lotjghran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4419 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to provide outer burial receptacles for each new grave in cemeteries that are the subjects of certain grants made by the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 4, 2020 

Mr. ROUNDS (for himself, Mr. CASSIDY, and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide outer burial receptacles for each new grave in cemeteries that are the 

subjects of certain grants made by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Burial Ben5 efit Correction Act of 2020’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4419 IS

1 SEC. 2. OUTER BURIAL RECEPTACLES FOR EACH NEW 

2 GRAVE IN CEMETERIES THAT ARE THE SUB3 JECTS OF CERTAIN GRANTS MADE BY THE 

4 SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

5 Section 2306(e) of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting ‘‘, or in 

8 a cemetery that is the subject of a grant to a State 

9 or a tribal organization under section 2408 of this 

10 title,’’ after ‘‘National Cemetery Administration’’; 

11 and 

12 (2) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the 

13 following new paragraph (2): 

14 ‘‘(2)(A) The use of outer burial receptacles in a ceme15 tery under the control of the National Cemetery Adminis16 tration or in a cemetery that is the subject of a grant to 

17 a State or a tribal organization under section 2408 of this 

18 title shall be in accordance with regulations or procedures 

19 approved by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

20 ‘‘(B) The use of outer burial receptacles in Arlington 

21 National Cemetery shall be in accordance with regulations 

22 or procedures approved by the Secretary of the Army. 

23 ‘‘(C) The use of outer burial receptacles in a national 

24 cemetery administered by the National Park Service shall 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4419 IS

1 be in accordance with regulations or procedures approved 

2 by the Secretary of the Interior.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION



18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:



In connection with this quarterly report of PharmaNetics, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to his/her knowledge:



1. This report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and



2. The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of PharmaNetics,
Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



Date: August 12, 2003



/s/ John P. FunkhouserJohn P. FunkhouserChief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of 24/7 RealMedia, Inc. (the “**Company**”)on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I, Jonathan K. Hsu, ExecutiveVice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

April 30,2007

|   | /s/ Jonathan K. Hsu                                                            |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer  and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)                                   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
#### GRAY v. ANDROE.

(Decided December 16, 1915.)

Appeal from Montgomery City Court.

Heard before Hon. Gaston Gunter.

John F. Dillard, for appellant. No counsel marked for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed on motion of appellant.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4494 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4494

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend the period with 
   respect to which amounts under the Coronavirus Relief Fund may be 
                               expended.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 6, 2020

  Ms. Hassan (for herself and Mr. Grassley) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend the period with 
   respect to which amounts under the Coronavirus Relief Fund may be 
                               expended.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State and Local Coronavirus Relief 
Fund Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION.

    Section 601(d)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 801(d)(3)) 
is amended by striking ``December 30, 2020'' and inserting ``December 
31, 2021''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10.8.2

                                                                       [5/13/03]

Schedule identifying executives of Mindspeed who will be party to an Employment
Agreement in the form set forth as Exhibit 10.8.1 to this Registration
Statement


                                      Name
                                      ----

                                David W. Carroll

                                   Mojy Chian

                                 Harry Davoody

                                 Raouf Y. Halim

                                 Thomas Medrek

                                Wayne K. Nesbit

                                Daryush Shamlou

                                Thomas A. Stites

                                Bradley W. Yates
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. GT00-30-000]

Take notice that on May 1, 2000, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company (Panhandle) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet to be effective June 1, 2000:

Third Revised Sheet No. 3B

Panhandle states that the purpose of this filing, made in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.106 of the Commission's Regulations, is to revise the system map to reflect changes in the pipeline facilities and the points at which service is provided.

Panhandle states that copies of this filing are being served on all affected customers and applicable state regulatory agencies.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public                           ( print page 30104)                        inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-11628  Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M