alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act Rule 13a-14,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ProLink Holdings Corp.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to we, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on out most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 (d)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of the internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and(e)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or the other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Lawrence D. BainLawrence D. BainChief Executive Officer
§ 63.31 Eligibility requirements; general. To be eligible for a flight engineer certificate, a person must— ( a ) Be at least 21 years of age;
( b ) Be able to read, speak, and understand the English language, or have an appropriate limitation placed on his flight engineer certificate;
( c ) Hold at least a second-class medical certificate issued under part 67 of this chapter within the 12 months before the date he applies, or other evidence of medical qualification accepted for the issue of a flight engineer certificate under § 63.42; and
( d ) Comply with the requirements of this subpart that apply to the rating he seeks.
(Sec. 6, 80 Stat. 937, 49 U.S.C. 1655)
[Doc. No. 6458, 30 FR 14559, Nov. 23, 1965, as amended by Amdt. 63-9, 33 FR 18614, Dec. 17, 1968]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4149 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4149

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to remove the limitation on 
reimbursement for emergency treatment of amounts owed to a third party 
 or for which the veteran is responsible under a health-plan contract.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 1, 2020

 Mr. Blumenthal (for himself, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Brown, Ms. Hirono, and 
  Mr. Tester) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to remove the limitation on 
reimbursement for emergency treatment of amounts owed to a third party 
 or for which the veteran is responsible under a health-plan contract.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Emergency Care Reimbursement Act of 
2020''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF LIMITATION ON REIMBURSEMENT FOR EMERGENCY TREATMENT 
              OF AMOUNTS OWED TO A THIRD PARTY OR FOR WHICH THE VETERAN 
              IS RESPONSIBLE UNDER A HEALTH-PLAN CONTRACT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c)(4) of section 1725 of title 38, 
United States Code, is amended by striking subparagraph (D).
    (b) Application of Amendment.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
shall apply with respect to any reimbursement request under section 
1725 of such title submitted to the Department of Veterans Affairs for 
emergency treatment furnished on or after February 1, 2010.
    (c) Impact on Existing Court Case.--Nothing in this section or the 
amendment made by this section shall limit the rights of any member of 
the Wolfe class seeking relief in Wolfe v. Wilkie, No. 18-6091 (Vet. 
App. filed October 30, 2018).
    (d) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Emergency treatment; health-plan contract.--The terms 
        ``emergency treatment'' and ``health-plan contract'' have the 
        meanings given those terms in section 1725(f) of title 38, 
        United States Code.
            (2) Reimbursement request.--The term ``reimbursement 
        request'' includes any claim by a veteran for reimbursement of 
        a copayment, deductible, coinsurance, or similar payment for 
        emergency treatment furnished to the veteran in a non-
        Department of Veterans Affairs facility and made by a veteran 
        who had coverage under a health-plan contract, including any 
        claim for the reasonable value of emergency treatment that was 
        rejected or denied by the Department of Veterans Affairs, 
        whether the rejection or denial was final or not.
                                 <all>
```
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00067

- CV
Kenneth L. Berry v. Bay, Ltd.
On Appeal from the 343rd District Court of San Patricio County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. S

- 18

- 5171CV

- C

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case should be remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appe llant

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
March 3 , 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                               UT
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Statement of Income, Balance Sheet and Statement of Cash Flows, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                            PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>               3,778,265
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>               341,346
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                  1,912,037
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                  863,454
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          6,895,102
<COMMON>                                    1,588
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>               2,548,084
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                       473,236
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>          3,022,908
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     363,000
<PREFERRED>                                85,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                    1,619,067
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>             398,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>          1,407,127
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>           6,895,102
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>               1,721,852
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                      (62,506)
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>              1,771,119
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>              1,708,613
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                    13,239
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                        (41,457)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>            (28,218)
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  138,715
<NET-INCOME>                             (166,933)
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                28,604
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>            (195,537)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                  214,012
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                 129,681
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                   (460,288)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (1.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (1.34)
        

</TABLE>
#### Day and others *vs.*Rice and others.

ALBANY,

March, 1839.

The statute staying an execution on a judgment, for one year after the death of the party against whom it is rendered, does not prohibit an execution for that period, where the judgment is against the deceased defendant *together*with others, and satisfaction is sought out of the property of the other defendants.

Motion to set aside a *ji. fa.*for irregularity. The judgment was recovered November 5, 1838. On the 9th *645November a fi. fa. was issued to the sheriff of Seneca county, where Henry Woolsey, one of the defendants, lived. On the 20th of that month Woolsey died, and in December following the plaintiffs, for the purpose of reaching the property of Rice, and another defendant, who lived in Yates, issued a ft. fa. to that county, tested the 27th October, and returnable at the next January term.

*P, Cagger,*

for the surviving defendants, moved to set aside the last *fi. fa.*on the ground that it was irregularly issued after the death of Woolsey, and cited 2 R. S. 368, § 27.

S. *M. Woodruff,*contra.

*By the Court,*

Bronson, J.

The second execution was regularly tested of a time when all the defendants were alive; and the plaintiffs did not seek to reach the property of Woolsey, but of the surviving defendants. There can be no doubt that this proceeding was regular at the common law; and I think the statute only applies to the case of a sole defendant, who dies after judgment, and before execution, or where the plaintiff attempts to take the property of a deceased defendant. See *Nichols*v. *Chapman,*9 Wend. 452, *Stymets*v. *Brooks,*10 Wend. 206.

Motion denied.
Exhibit 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF ACTUATE CORPORATION



|Subsidiary Name                   |  | Incorporated/Formed In                     
|--------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Actuate Australia Pty Limited     |  | Australia                                  
|Actuate Canada Corporation        |  | Canada                                     
|Actuate Cayman Limited            |  | Cayman Islands                             
|Actuate Corporation PTE Limited   |  | Singapore                                  
|Actuate France, S.A.              |  | France                                     
|Actuate Germany GmbH              |  | Germany                                    
|Actuate Holding, B.V.             |  | The Netherlands                            
|Actuate International SARL        |  | Switzerland                                
|Actuate Japan Co., Ltd.           |  | Japan                                      
|Actuate Limited                   |  | Hong Kong                                  
|Actuate UK Ltd                    |  | United Kingdom                             
|Actuate International Corporation |  | State of Delaware, United States of America
|Tidestone Corporation             |  | State of Kansas, United States of America
§ 435.1 General. ( a ) *Applicability.* This part applies to the following— ( 1 ) Licenses issued under this part before June 8, 2021; and
( 2 ) Licenses issued on or after June 8, 2021, if the FAA accepted the application under § 413.11 of this chapter before that date.
( b ) *Scope.* This part prescribes requirements for obtaining a license to reenter a reentry vehicle other than a reusable launch vehicle (RLV), and post-licensing requirements with which a licensee must comply to remain licensed. Requirements for preparing a license application are contained in part 413 of this subchapter.
( c ) *Equivalent level of safety.* Each requirement of this part applies unless the applicant or licensee clearly and convincingly demonstrates that an alternative approach provides an equivalent level of safety to the requirement of this part.
[Doc. No. FAA-2019-0229, Amdt. 435-5, 85 FR 79717, Dec. 10, 2020]
§ 25.689 Cable systems. ( a ) Each cable, cable fitting, turnbuckle, splice, and pulley must be approved. In addition— ( 1 ) No cable smaller than 1 ⁄ 8 inch in diameter may be used in the aileron, elevator, or rudder systems; and
( 2 ) Each cable system must be designed so that there will be no hazardous change in cable tension throughout the range of travel under operating conditions and temperature variations.
( b ) Each kind and size of pulley must correspond to the cable with which it is used. Pulleys and sprockets must have closely fitted guards to prevent the cables and chains from being displaced or fouled. Each pulley must lie in the plane passing through the cable so that the cable does not rub against the pulley flange.
( c ) Fairleads must be installed so that they do not cause a change in cable direction of more than three degrees.
( d ) Clevis pins subject to load or motion and retained only by cotter pins may not be used in the control system.
( e ) Turnbuckles must be attached to parts having angular motion in a manner that will positively prevent binding throughout the range of travel.
( f ) There must be provisions for visual inspection of fairleads, pulleys, terminals, and turnbuckles.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00361-CV

In the INTEREST OF S.B.W. and C.N.W.

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PA-01354

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Associate Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order of termination is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED September 11, 2013.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
#### § 65.14 [Reserved]
P. 1


# OAR Box 1802 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 43 ) IV-E-3 8 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/200811:57:59 AM

Sheet 43 of 117P. 2 A-90-3 7

•>loJ I 0 : • • EPr t AI R COCKZ

T Date : Septembe

r 21,199 9 To : Ai r and Radiatio n Docke

t #A-90-3 7 From : Denni s Crumpler , Integrate d Implementatio n Group , ITPID , MD-1 2 Re : Meetin g wit

h Chemica l Manufacturer s Associatio n (CMA ) O n Septembe

r 8 , 1999 , Messrs
. Erni e Rosenber g an d Te d Cromwell ofth e CM

A met wit h severa l office s o f

EP A (attende e lis t

i s below)
. The discussio n focused o n ho w emissio n control s on existin g unit s migh t creat e mor e flexibility fo

r th e mor e genera l ne w sourc e revie w (NSR ) applicabilit

y provision s being considere d in NS R Refor mrulemaking
. Ther

e wa s brie f mentio n o f

concern s tha

t stil l remain wit

h th e Clas s I are aprovision s tha t wer e propose d i n July 1996
. cc : Pa mSmith , (MD-12 ) Jo n Devine , OG

C Attendees : Ted Cromwell , CM

A Erni e Rosenberg , CM

A Bil l Harnett , OAQPS Davi d Solomon , OAQPS Denni s Crumpler , OAQPS Mik e Sewell , OAQPS Kare n Blanchard , OAQP S Rich Biondi , OEC

A (vi atelephone ) Davi d Svendsgaard , OAQP S Ann aWood , OPA

R (vi atelephone ) Jo n Devine , OG

C (vi atelephone ) Da n deRoeck , OAQPS EP A Office Abbreviations : OAQPS

- Offic e o f Air Qualit y Plannin g an

d Standards ; OGC-

- Office o f Genera l Counsel ; OECA-Offic e o f Enforcemen

t an d Complianc e Assurance ; an d OPAR-Offic e o f

Polic y Analysi s an

d Regulations
.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officer of ProLink Holdings Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) does
      hereby certify to his knowledge, that:





The
      Quarterly Report for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the
      Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form
      10-Q
      fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the company.





Dated:
                May 15, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Lawrence D. BainLawrence
                D. BainChief
                Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 91.1045 Additional equipment requirements. No person may operate a program aircraft on a program flight unless the aircraft is equipped with the following— ( a ) Airplanes having a passenger-seat configuration of more than 30 seats or a payload capacity of more than 7,500 pounds: ( 1 ) A cockpit voice recorder as required by § 121.359 of this chapter as applicable to the aircraft specified in that section.
( 2 ) A flight recorder as required by § 121.343 or § 121.344 of this chapter as applicable to the aircraft specified in that section.
( 3 ) A terrain awareness and warning system as required by § 121.354 of this chapter as applicable to the aircraft specified in that section.
( 4 ) A traffic alert and collision avoidance system as required by § 121.356 of this chapter as applicable to the aircraft specified in that section.
( 5 ) Airborne weather radar as required by § 121.357 of this chapter, as applicable to the aircraft specified in that section.
( b ) Airplanes having a passenger-seat configuration of 30 seats or fewer, excluding each crewmember, and a payload capacity of 7,500 pounds or less, and any rotorcraft (as applicable): ( 1 ) A cockpit voice recorder as required by § 135.151 of this chapter as applicable to the aircraft specified in that section.
( 2 ) A flight recorder as required by § 135.152 of this chapter as applicable to the aircraft specified in that section.
( 3 ) A terrain awareness and warning system as required by § 135.154 of this chapter as applicable to the aircraft specified in that section.
( 4 ) A traffic alert and collision avoidance system as required by § 135.180 of this chapter as applicable to the aircraft specified in that section.
( 5 ) As applicable to the aircraft specified in that section, either: ( i ) Airborne thunderstorm detection equipment as required by § 135.173 of this chapter; or
( ii ) Airborne weather radar as required by § 135.175 of this chapter.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6301

JAMES COLLINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN BAKER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CA-98-12-5-BO)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 6, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Collins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James Collins appeals from the district court’s judgment

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Collins v. Baker, No. CA-98-12-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb.

6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
###### Editorial Note on Part 294

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 294 appear at 84 FR 15934, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 294.87 Compliance with Canadian licenses.

A registrant shall not, in the performance of operations authorized by this part, use any aircraft or conduct any operations except in accordance with the authority and conditions contained in the registrant's applicable Canadian licenses.
#### § 63.21 Change of address.

Within 30 days after any change in his permanent mailing address, the holder of a certificate issued under this part shall notify the Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Airman Certification Branch, Post Office Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125, in writing, of his new address.

[Doc. No. 10536, 35 FR 14075, Sept. 4, 1970]
EXHIBIT 23.1

ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
24/7 Real Media, Inc.:

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-112729, 333-111991, 333-109925, 333-108422, 333-106252, 333-100583, 333-89985,
333-47074, and 333-34020) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-100582, 333-87714, 333-83287, 333-66995, 333-56308, and
333-35306) on Form S-8 of 24/7 Real Media, Inc. of our report dated February 20, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of 24/7 Real
Media, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash
flows, for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
24/7 Real Media, Inc.

| |  | /s/GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP
| |  | ------------------------------

New
York, New York
March 1, 2004

---

QuickLinks