alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0098 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-SW-039-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
§ 93.95 General operating procedures. Unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator, no person may operate an aircraft in the airspace described in § 93.93 unless the operation is conducted in accordance with the following procedures: ( a ) The flight must be conducted under VFR and only when operation may be conducted in compliance with § 91.155(a) of this chapter.
( b ) The aircraft must be equipped as specified in § 91.215(b) of this chapter replying on code 1201 prior to entering and while operating in this area.
( c ) The pilot shall have a current Los Angeles Terminal Area Chart in the aircraft.
( d ) The pilot shall operate on the Santa Monica very high frequency omni-directional radio range (VOR) 132° radial.
( e ) Aircraft navigating in a southeasterly direction shall be in level flight at 3,500 feet MSL.
( f ) Aircraft navigating in a northwesterly direction shall be in level flight at 4,500 feet MSL.
( g ) Indicated airspeed shall not exceed 140 knots.
( h ) Anti-collision lights and aircraft position/navigation lights shall be on. Use of landing lights is recommended.
( i ) Turbojet aircraft are prohibited from VFR operations in this area.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Educational Systemic Reform (1765).                    

*Date and Time:*                         June 1-2, 2000; 8 a.m.-5:30 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Room 370, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Celeste Pea, Program Director, Division of Educational Systemic Reform, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 875, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1682.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate proposals for the Supplement: Urban Systemic Program, K-12 Higher Education Partnerships as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: May 2, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-11269  Filed 5-04-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**Subsidiaries of Digital River, Inc.**

 

CCNow, Inc., a Minnesotacorporation

 

Digibuy, Inc., a Minnesotacorporation

 

Digital River, Inc., aMinnesota corporation

 

Digital River E-BusinessServices, Inc., a Delaware corporation

 

Digital River UK, Limited, aUnited Kingdom corporation

 

DR Express, Inc., a Delawarecorporation

 

DR E-Subscription Services,Inc., a Delaware corporation

 

DR Acquisition 03-F, Inc., aMinnesota corporation

 

Emetrix, Inc., a Minnesotacorporation

 

FreeMerchant, Inc., a Minnesotacorporation

 

GameZone Online, Inc., aMinnesota corporation

 

Orbit Commerce, Inc., aMinnesota corporation

 

Reg.Net, Inc., a Minnesotacorporation

 

RegNow, Inc., a Minnesotacorporation

 

RegSoft, Inc., a Minnesotacorporation

 

RegSoft.com, Inc., a Georgiacorporation

 

----
#### § 71.3 [Reserved]
#### § 91.805 Final compliance: Subsonic airplanes.

Except as provided in §§ 91.809 and 91.811, on and after January 1, 1985, no person may operate to or from an airport in the United States any subsonic airplane covered by this subpart unless that airplane has been shown to comply with Stage 2 or Stage 3 noise levels under part 36 of this chapter.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4658 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to allow for greater State 

flexibility with respect to excluding providers who are involved in abortions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2020 

Mr. LANKFORD (for himself, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. CRAMER, Mrs. LOEFFLER, Mr. 

INHOFE, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. RISCH, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. MORAN, Mr. CRAPO, 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. THUNE, Mr. 

LEE, and Mr. ROUNDS) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to allow 

for greater State flexibility with respect to excluding 

providers who are involved in abortions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Women’s Public 

5 Health and Safety Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4658 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASING STATE FLEXIBILITY IN DETERMINING 

2 PARTICIPATION OF PROVIDERS WHO PER3 FORM, OR PARTICIPATE IN THE PERFORM4 ANCE OF, ABORTIONS. 

5 Section 1902 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 1396a) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a)(23), by striking ‘‘sub8 section (g)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsections (g) and 

9 (tt),’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub11 section: 

12 ‘‘(tt) RULES WITH RESPECT TO DETERMINATION OF

13 PARTICIPATION OF PROVIDERS WHO PERFORM, OR PAR14 TICIPATE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF, ABORTIONS.— 

15 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), 

16 for purposes of this title, a State, at its option, may 

17 establish criteria with respect to the participation 

18 under the State plan (or a waiver of such plan) of 

19 an institution, an agency, an entity, or a person who 

20 performs, or participates in the performance of, 

21 abortions. 

22 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—Paragraph (1) shall not 

23 apply to an abortion— 

24 ‘‘(A) if the pregnancy is the result of an 

25 act of rape or incest; or 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4658 IS

1 ‘‘(B) in the case where a woman suffers 

2 from a physical disorder, physical injury, or 

3 physical illness that would, as certified by a 

4 physician, place the woman in danger of death 

5 unless an abortion is performed, including a 

6 life-endangering physical condition caused by or 

7 arising from the pregnancy itself. 

8 ‘‘(3) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this sub9 section, the terms ‘institution’, ‘agency’, or ‘entity’ 

10 mean the entire legal institution, agency, or entity, 

11 or any part thereof, including any institution, agen12 cy, or entity that controls, is controlled by, or is 

13 under common control with such institution, agency, 

14 or entity.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-2048

CONNIE JOHNSON; RAY JOHNSON,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

DIAL INDUSTRIES SALES, INCORPORATED; TELESTEPS, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,

District Judge. (3:05-cv-00047-JPB)

Submitted: July 14, 2008 Decided: August 6, 2008

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis F. O’Brien, FOARD, GISRIEL, O’BRIEN & WARD, LLC, Towson,

Maryland, for Appellants. John T. Sly, James B. Lees, Jr., WARANCH

& BROWN, LLC, Lutherville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Connie and Ray Johnson appeal the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to Defendants. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Dial Indus.

Sales, Inc., No. 3:05-cv-00047-JPB (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 21, 2007).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.9
Copley MOA Coal Lease Option
Memorandum of Agreement

This memorandum of coal lease agreement, made and entered into on this the
_____ day of ______________, 2003, by and between  James Harris,_____________
Harris, Bascom Copley, Jr. Louella McDaniel, Romane______________, Eula Faye
Copley, Howard D. Copley, and Joyce G. Conn, hereinafter referred to as Lessor
and Eastern Land Development, LLC, whose address is P.O. Box 537, Betsey
Layne, KY 41605, a Kentucky Limited Liability company, hereinafter called
Lessee.
WITNESSETH:  That for and in consideration of the mutual promises of the
parties, the parties entered into a certain Lease Agreement dated October 9,
2003 and in the place of recording the aforesaid Lease Agreement, the parties
have agreed to execute and record this Memorandum of Coal Lease Agreement.
TERM
The term of this Lease shall be for a period commencing with the date first
above written and continuing thereafter for a term of Three (3) years. If
mining has commenced this agreement shall, however continue for so long as
Lessee is mining and producing coal through or on the leased premises, or this
lease is terminated by Lessee.  Lessee shall have the right, after expiration
or other termination of this Lease, regardless of the reason for termination,
to enter upon the property for the purpose of reclaiming areas disturbed by
its mining and otherwise complying with the requirements of any local, state
or federal law, rule, regulation or ordinance.
RIGHTS GRANTED
Lessor hereby grants unto Lessee the exclusive right to mine and remove by any
method of mining all the coal within all seams and veins of coal above and
below drainage in, on and under those certain tracts or parcels lying on and
under the Elk Creek area of Martin County Kentucky.
VALID AGREEMENT
The parties hereto acknowledge that the Lease Agreement of which this is a
memorandum is a valid and binding Lease Agreement and that there is adequate
and sufficient consideration between the parties for the validity of same.
The parties hereto acknowledge that the aforesaid Lease Agreement has been
properly executed by the parties and that there has been a delivery and
acceptance of same by the parties.

Signed this the 10th day of October, 2003
LESSEE:
Eastern Land Development, LLC
BY /s/Billy Reed
Billy Reed, Member

LESSORS:

/s/James F. Harris
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,166
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,708
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,374)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,623
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,788
<PP&E>                                          17,470
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (53)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 188,410
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,896
<BONDS>                                         74,673
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            72
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   188,410
<SALES>                                          8,395
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,395
<CGS>                                            2,368
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,582
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 273
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,466)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,466)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,466)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.78)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 31.61 Static discharge.

Unless shown not to be necessary for safety, there must be appropriate bonding means in the design of each balloon using flammable gas as a lifting means to ensure that the effects of static discharges will not create a hazard.

[Amdt. 31-2, 30 FR 3377, Mar. 13, 1965]
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Pulaski Financial Corp.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
registration statements (No. 333-32986, No. 333-84392, No. 333-84515, No. 333-112962 and No. 333-135895) on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement (No. 333-129026) on Form S-3 of Pulaski Financial Corp. and subsidiaries (the
Company) of our reports dated December 13, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of September 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the threeyear period ended September 30, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007, which report is incorporated by
reference in the September 30, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of the Company.

Our report with respect to the consolidated financial statements refers to
the Companys adoption of the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Boards Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, on October 1, 2005.



|                   
|-------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP       
|St. Louis, Missouri
|December 13, 2007
anrexhibit103.htm


    Exhibit
10.3


    


    Summary Description of
Director Compensation

    


    
      	
              Element
      of Compensation for Non-Management Directors

              (other than the Chairman)1 

            	 	
              Dollar Value

            	 
      
	
              Annual
      Board Cash Retainer

            	 	
              $60,000

            	 
      
	
              Annual
      Committee Chair Cash Retainer (other than Audit and Compensation
      Committees)

            	 	
              $7,500

            	 
      
	
              Annual
      Audit Committee Chair Cash Retainer

            	 	
              $15,000

            	 
      
	
              Annual
      Compensation Committee Chair Cash Retainer

            	 	
              $10,000

            	 
      
	
              Per
      Meeting Fee (Board and Committees)

            	 	
              $2,000

            	 
      
	
              Annual
      Equity Award

            	 	
              $92,500

            	
              (in
      restricted stock units)

            
	
              Initial
      Equity Award

            	 	
              $80,000

            	
              (in
      restricted stock units)

            
	 
      	 	 
      	 
      
	
              1
      Non-employee directors may elect to defer cash compensation under a
      Director Deferred Compensation Agreement.

               

            	 	 
      	 
      
	
              Chairman Compensation: 

            	 	 
      	 
      
	
              Salary
      (August 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009)

            	 	
              $360,000

            	 
      
	
              Annual
      Board Cash Retainer (after December 31, 2009)

            	 	
              $125,000

            	 
      
	
              Annual
      Equity Award after December 31, 2009

            	 	
              $92,500

            	 
      
	
              Per
      Board Meeting Fee (after December 31, 2009)

            	 	
              $2,000

            	 
      


    

     

    Stock
Ownership Guidelines:  Each director must hold three (3) times
the "Annual Board Cash Retainer" or "Salary" as applicable, in Alpha Natural
Resources, Inc.'s common stock (including any securities convertible or
exercisable into its common stock) after five (5) years of service on the
Board.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Emil Sundheimer, as Executor of Paul Sundheimer, Deceased, Respondent. Sigrid M. Sundheimer, Appellant; Alice Dillingham, as Special Guardian, Respondent.

(Argued September 29, 1936;

decided October 13, 1936.)

*533
      *Amende Lesser*for appellant.

*Harry J. Winick, Morris Rosenbaum, Louis Timberg*and *Rubin Mazel*for Emil Sundheimer, as executor of Paul Sundheimer, deceased, respondent.

*Alice Dillingham,*as special guardian, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs payable out of the estate. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
§ 10.55 Proceedings of the Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) The Office of Administrative Law Judges has jurisdiction to hear and decide appeals concerning questions of law and fact from the Administrator's investigative findings letters issued under §§ 10.51 and 10.52. Any party may, when requesting an appeal or during the pendency of a proceeding on appeal, timely move an Administrative Law Judge to consolidate a proceeding initiated hereunder with a proceeding initiated under the Service Contract Act or the Davis-Bacon Act.
( b ) *Proposed findings of fact, conclusions, and order.* Within 20 calendar days of filing of the transcript of the testimony or such additional time as the Administrative Law Judge may allow, each party may file with the Administrative Law Judge proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a proposed order, together with a supporting brief expressing the reasons for such proposals. Each party shall serve such proposals and brief on all other parties.
( c ) *Decision.* ( 1 ) Within a reasonable period of time after the time allowed for filing of proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order, or within 30 calendar days of receipt of an agreement containing consent findings and order disposing of the disputed matter in whole, the Administrative Law Judge shall issue a decision. The decision shall contain appropriate findings, conclusions, and an order, and be served upon all parties to the proceeding.
( 2 ) If the respondent is found to have violated Executive Order 13658 or this part, and if the Administrator requested debarment, the Administrative Law Judge shall issue an order as to whether the respondent is to be subject to the ineligible list, including findings that the contractor disregarded its obligations to workers or subcontractors under the Executive Order or this part.
( d ) *Limit on scope of review.* The Equal Access to Justice Act, as amended, does not apply to proceedings under this part. Accordingly, Administrative Law Judges shall have no authority to award attorney's fees and/or other litigation expenses pursuant to the provisions of the Equal Access to Justice Act for any proceeding under this part.
( e ) *Orders.* If the Administrative Law Judge concludes a violation occurred, the final order shall mandate action to remedy the violation, including, but not limited to, monetary relief for unpaid wages. Where the Administrator has sought imposition of debarment, the Administrative Law Judge shall determine whether an order imposing debarment is appropriate.
( f ) *Finality.* The Administrative Law Judge's decision shall become the final order of the Secretary, unless a timely petition for review is filed with the Administrative Review Board.