alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John Blazas *vs.*The Connecticut Company.

First Judicial District, Hartford,

March Term, 1917.

Prentice, C. J., Thayer, Roraback, Wheeler and Beach, Js.

Upon an appeal from a judgment for the defendant in an action for personal injuries tried to the court, it is not material whether the plaintiff was in-the exercise of due care or not, if the facts found unmistakably disclose that there was no negligence upon the part of the defendant.

Argued March 6th—

decided March 14th, 1917

*552Action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the defendant’s negligence, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in Hartford County, *Shumway,*Jfacts found and judgment rendered for the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiff.

*No error.*

*Lawrence E. Lewis,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Joseph F. Berry,*for the appellee (defendant).

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff was injured by being run into by the defendant’s trolley-car. The court has found the subordinate facts, from which the conclusions are inevitable, that the defendant was not guilty of negligence and that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. The plaintiff, in his appeal, complains of the finding in several more or less pertinent particulars, and asks its correction. Nearly all of these particulars concern the plaintiff’s exercise of due care. Only a few bear even remotely upon the issue as to the defendant’s conduct.- With regard to these latter we are unable to discover, from an examination of the testimony, that this court would be justified in changing in any material respects the finding as made. As the facts, as they are found and must stand, unmistakably disclose that the defendant was in the exercise of ordinary care, it becomes unimportant whether or not the plaintiff was himself at fault, as the trial court found him to have been.

There is no error.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 88 (Friday, May 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 26207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11260]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Federal Open Market Committee; Domestic Policy Directive of 
February 1-2, 2000

    In accordance with Sec. 71.5 of its rules regarding availability of 
information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below the domestic 
policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market Committee at its 
meeting held on February 1-2, 2000.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee 
meeting of February 1-2, 2000, which include the domestic policy 
directive issued at that meeting, are available upon request to the 
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 
20551. The minutes are published in the Federal Reserve Bulletin and 
in the Board's annual report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial 
conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable 
growth in output. In furtherance of these objectives, the Committee at 
this meeting established ranges for growth of M2 and M3 of 1 to 5 
percent and 2 to 6 percent respectively, measured from the fourth 
quarter of 1999 to the fourth quarter of 2000. The range for growth of 
total domestic nonfinancial debt was set at 3 to 7 percent for the 
year. The behavior of the monetary aggregates will continue to be 
evaluated in the light of movements in their velocities and 
developments in prices, the economy, and financial markets.
    To further the Committee's long-run objectives of price stability 
and sustainable economic growth, the Committee in the immediate future 
seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with increasing the 
federal funds rate to an average of around 5\3/4\ percent.

    By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, May 1, 2000.
Normand Bernard,
Deputy Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.
[FR Doc. 00-11260 Filed 5-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit 31.1  IDEAEDGE, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, James Collas, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of IdeaEdge, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) [Paragraph omitted]; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date: December 21, 2007/s/ James CollasJames CollasChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 89 (Monday, May 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 26583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11467]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of Delaware; Notice of Decision on Application for 
Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscope

    This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 A.M. and 5 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 
14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 00-008. Applicant: University of Delaware, Newark, 
DE 19716. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model JEM-2010F. 
Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 65 FR 
21397, April 21, 2000. Order Date: November 1, 1999.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as the instrument is intended to be used, was being 
manufactured in the United States at the time the instrument was 
ordered. Reasons: The foreign instrument is a conventional transmission 
electron microscope (CTEM) and is intended for research or scientific 
educational uses requiring a CTEM. We know of no CTEM, or any other 
instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in 
the United States at the time of order of the instrument.

Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 00-11467 Filed 5-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 32 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlantica, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB-A1 for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We, Duane S. Jenson, President and Shelley Goff, Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| *Date:*** | *06/29/06*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Duane S. Jenson***                      |
|-----------|--------------|----------|----------|---------------------------------------------|
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Duane S. Jenson, President and Director*** |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | * *                                    |
| *Date:*** | *06/29/06*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Shelley Goff***                         |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Shelley Goff, Secretary and Director***    |
20

20

20

20

20

10

10

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

10

20

30

20

20

20

20

10

20

20

10

20

20

10

20

30

20

20

30

20

20

30

20

20

20

10

20

20

10

20

10

20

20

20

30

20

20

40

20

20

20

20

20

10

20

30

20

20

10

20

30

20

20

20

10

20

20

10

10

10

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

10

10

20

10

20

30

10

10

20

10

20

20

10

20

20

20

10

10

20

20

20

20

20

10

20

20

10

30

20

20

20

20

20

20

20 20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

10

20

20

20

20

Santa

Elena

Trap

Chaparral

Windmill

Los

Indios

Ranch

Los

Indios

Well

Agujon

Well

Potrero

Cortado La Parra

Ranch SW

La Parra

Ranch NE

Potrero

Lopeno NW

La Parra

Ranch

San

Pedro

Ranch

Yarborough

Pass

La Parra

Ranch SE

Maria

Estella

Well

FEET

FEET

PR

PQ

PQ

PR

1 270 000 FEET

97°30'

35'

27°

32'

30"

27°

30'

37'

30"

97° 35'

07'

00' 27°00'

27°

37'

5'

32'30"

07'

30" 97°

2'30" 30"

5'

2'

97°

30" 30"

16 930 000

1 300 000 FEET

16 900000

E

30 000m

30

6

000m

29

6

29

6

6

29

6

29

29

6

29

6

29

6

6

29

6

6

30

29

29

6

29

000m 6

6

29

29

6

29

6

6

29

6

29

29

29

000m

29

6

29

6

6 6

29

29

29

00 N

45

E

89

38 44

40

98

94

96

97

38 39 44

37

95

95

43 45

00

94

01

98

91

88

93

47

99

39 41

92

89

88

91

42

93

43 46

99

41 48

40 42 48

90

N

97

96

90

47

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 2797-211

LA PARRA RANCH SE, TX

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

LA PARRA RANCH SE QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14R

Imagery......................................................NAIP, April 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2008

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2009

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 39 ́

12 MILS

4° 42 ́

84 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14R

PQ

PR 30 00

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
TS- ASLT60

Attachment #2

Summary of Information on the New Chemical Substance sTS

- ASLT60 Attachment #2

**Manufacturing and Processing Information on the**

**New Chemical Substances**

**– General Description**
§ 91.871 Waivers from interim compliance requirements. ( a ) Any U.S. operator or foreign air carrier subject to the requirements of § 91.865 or 91.867 of this subpart may request a waiver from any individual compliance requirement.
( b ) Applications must be filed with the Secretary of Transportation at least 120 days prior to the compliance date from which the waiver is requested.
( c ) Applicants must show that a grant of waiver would be in the public interest, and must include in its application its plans and activities for modifying its fleet, including evidence of good faith efforts to comply with the requirements of § 91.865 or § 91.867. The application should contain all information the applicant considers relevant, including, as appropriate, the following: ( 1 ) The applicant's balance sheet and cash flow positions;
( 2 ) The composition of the applicant's current fleet; and
( 3 ) The applicant's delivery position with respect to new airplanes or noise-abatement equipment.
( d ) Waivers will be granted only upon a showing by the applicant that compliance with the requirements of § 91.865 or 91.867 at a particular interim compliance date is financially onerous, physically impossible, or technologically infeasible, or that it would have an adverse effect on competition or on service to small communities.
( e ) The conditions of any waiver granted under this section shall be determined by the circumstances presented in the application, but in no case may the term extend beyond the next interim compliance date.
( f ) A summary of any request for a waiver under this section will be published in the Federal Register, and public comment will be invited. Unless the Secretary finds that circumstances require otherwise, the public comment period will be at least 14 days.
[Doc. No. 26433, 56 FR 48660, Sept. 25, 1991]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 18

- 1254 Filed March 6, 2019

STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs. JOSEPH ERIC FUNKE , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeffrey D. Farrell , Judge.

Joseph Funke appeals the sentence entered following his guilty plea to possession of methamphetamine, thir d offense. AFFIRMED.

Tabitha L. Turner of Turner Law Firm, PLLC, West Des Moines , for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Thomas E. Bakke , Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Considered by Vogel, C.J. , Vaitheswaran, J., and Mahan , S.J. * *Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (201 9 ).2

VAITHESWARAN , Judge

. Joseph Funke pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine) , third offense. See Iowa Code section 124.401(5) (201 7). The district court adjudged him guilty of the crime and sentenced him to prison, with the sentence to be served consecutively to a sentence for a separate crime, for a term not exceeding seven years. On appeal, Funke contends the district court abuse d its discretion in imposing a prison term. See State v. Seats , 865 N.W.2d 545, 552 (Iowa 2015) (setting forth standard of review)

. He suggests “there were additional options available which would have provided more structure for [him] and possibl[y] aid ed in his rehabilitation effort.”
The district court addressed this issue. The court noted that Funke could have received probation rather than prison time as he requested had he simply continued in the treatment program he was attending when the prese ntence investigator interviewed him. However, the day before his originally scheduled sentencing hearing, Funke was “booted out of the treatment program.” He failed to appear for sentencing. 1 The court queried, “[W]hy would I think you’re going to
make it through a treatment program if you can’t even make it through the treatment program while you’re awaiting your sentencing hearing?” The court concluded Funke was not “a good risk” and a prison sentence might serve as a “wake

- up call” to move towards re habilitation.

1 A warrant was issued for Funke’s arrest , and the sentencing hearing was rescheduled.3 We discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s sentencing decision. Accordingly, we affirm his conviction, judgment and sentence for possession of methamphetamine third offense.
AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO HUTTIG BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.
                 AMENDED AND RESTATED 2001 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

This Amendment No. 1 to the Huttig Building Products, Inc. Amended and Restated
2001 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan") was approved by the Board of Directors on
April 28, 2003. The Plan was last restated as of December 3, 2001.

The Plan is amended as follows:

1. Clause (c) of Section 7 of the Plan is amended and restated to read in its
entirety as follows:

"(c) Except as otherwise permitted by the Committee or as otherwise provided in
an Award Agreement, if a Participant's employment is terminated for any reason
other than death, disability or retirement or after a Change in Control, such
Participant may exercise any Option in whole or in part, at any time within 90
days after such termination of employment, but only to the extent such Option is
exercisable at the date of termination in accordance with Section 6(b). In no
event may any Option be exercised after the expiration of the term of the
Option."

2. Effective Date: This amendment shall be effective as of March 5, 2003.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee, versus VADEN LEE WILLIAMS, Petitioner - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-70) Submitted: April 29, 2002 Decided: June 17, 2002 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vaden Lee Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Vaden Lee Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his petition to modify the terms of his supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(1) (West 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Williams , No. CR-91-70 (E.D. Va. Nov. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of M Line Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
Decmber 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or
about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jitu Banker, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  February
      22, 2010
            /s/
      Jitu BankerBy:  Jitu
      BankerIts:  Chief
      Financial Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
M Line Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by M Line Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
For the docket: Fw: Thank You EPA

Alison Davis to: Tricia Crabtree 01/07/2010 06:47 PM

---------------------------- Alison Davis

Sr. Advisor for Public Affairs

US EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

tel. 919-541-7587

mobile: 919-624-0872

----- Forwarded by Alison Davis/RTP/USEPA/US on 01/07/2010 06:46 PM -----

From: Cathy Milbourn/DC/USEPA/US

To: Alison Davis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/07/2010 05:47 PM

Subject: Fw: Thank You EPA

----- Forwarded by Cathy Milbourn/DC/USEPA/US on 01/07/2010 05:47 PM -----

From: "Hugh Moore" <hmpeace@cox.net>

To: Cathy Milbourn/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/07/2010 05:46 PM

Subject: Thank You EPA

Dear Ms. Milbourn,

I just read the article “EPA Strengthens Smog Standard/Proposed standards, strictest to date, will protect

the health of all Americans, especially children.” I want to make sure I get a chance to tell the EPA thank

you for mandating higher standards for reducing air pollution since no other federal agency has been

able to step up.

So thank you for the article and make sure my support for the EPA’s policy is passed on to the agency.

Peace,

Hugh Moore

166 N 1st Street, Unit 4

El Cajon, CA 92021

‐ 6906

H: 619 793 5397

C: 619 647 5830

hmpeace@cox.net
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6846

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DERRICK JACKSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-96-354-MJG, CR-96-354-HNM, CA-00-3343-HNM) Submitted: July 12, 2002 Decided: July 26, 2001 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derrick Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Derrick Jackson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denyleave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Jackson , Nos. CR-96-354-MJG; CR-96- 354-HNM; CA-00-3343-HNM (D. Md. May 9, 2001). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED