EMISSIONS TEST REPORT 

BIG BEND STATION 

FACILITY ID NUMBER: 0570039 

EMISSION UNIT ID NO: -001 

BOILER NO. 1 

PARTICULATE MATTER, SULFUR DIOXIDE, 

AND, 

VISIBLE EMISSIONS EVALUATION 

March 12, 2008 

Prepared For: 

Tampa Electric Company 

Big Bend Power Station 

P.O. Box 111 

Tampa, Florida 33601-0111 

Prepared By: 

Tampa Electric Company 

Environmental, Health, & Safety 

Air Services Group 

Environmental, Health, & Safety 

Air Services Group 

5010 Causeway Boulevard 

Tampa, Florida 33619- 6130 
REPORT CERTIFICATION 

 The sampling and subsequent data entry/reduction detailed in this report 

was conducted at my direction, and I hereby certify that this test report is 

authentic and accurate to the best of my knowledge. 

Signature:__________________________ 

Jorge A. Varino 

Environmental Technician 

Test Team Lead 

Air Services Group 

Environmental Health & Safety 

Tampa Electric Company 

 I have reviewed the test performance, associated quality assurance 

activities, the resultant calculations, and the contents of this report, and certify 

that all project quality objectives have been met. This report is approved for 

submittal. 

Signature:__________________________ 

Raymond A. McDarby, Jr. 

Senior Environmental Technician 

Quality Assurance/Quality Control Specialist 

Air Services Group 

Environmental Health & Safety 

Tampa Electric Company 

 I have reviewed the testing details and results submitted in this report, 

and hereby certify that this test report is authentic and accurate to the best of 

my knowledge. 

Signature:__________________________ 

David A. Smith 

Coordinator – Air Services Group 

Environmental Health & Safety 

Tampa Electric Company 
TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE NO.

1.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 1 

2.0 SOURCE DESCRIPTION/TEST PROCEDURES 3 

3.0 TEST RESULTS 

SOOT BLOWING PARTICULATE TEST SUMMARY 6 

NON SOOT BLOWING PARTICULATE TEST SUMMARY 7 

SULFUR DIOXIDE INFORMATION SUMMARY 8 

OPACITY DATA SUMMARY 9 

HEAT INPUT CALCULATIONS 11 

4.0 FIGURES 

FIGURE 1 SAMPLING LOCATION DIAGRAM 13 

APPENDICES

A. PARTICULATE MATTER CALCULATIONS

B. PARTICULATE MATTER LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA

C. BOILER/PRECIPITATOR OPERATIONAL DATA

D. PLANT CEMS DAHS PRINTOUTS

E. FUEL ANALYSIS

F. FIELD DATA SHEETS

G. SAMPLING EQUIPMENT CALIBRATIONS

H. CHAIN OF CUSTODY

I. TEST PARTICIPANTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION

On March 12, 2008, Tampa Electric Company’s Environmental Services, Air 

Services Group, performed source emission tests at the Big Bend Station, Boiler 

No. 1, emissions unit I.D.# 0570039-001. Testing was conducted according to 

procedures stipulated by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection 

(FDEP) for fossil fuel steam generators, and requirements in Title V Permit # 

0570039-021-AV. 

1 
2.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

The particulate matter emission rate under soot blowing conditions was derived 

by performing three United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 

Reference Method 5-B test runs. The average of the three test runs was 0.03 

lb/mmBtu. The FDEP permitted emission rate under soot blowing conditions is 

0.03 lb/mmBtu. 

The particulate matter emission rate under non-soot blowing conditions was 

derived by performing three USEPA Reference Method 5-B test runs. The 

average of the three test runs was 0.03 lb/mmBtu. The FDEP permitted 

emission rate under non-soot blowing conditions is 0.03 lb/mmBtu. 

The Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) emission rate was determined using data provided by 

the Continuous Emissions Monitoring System’s (CEMS), Data Acquisition and 

Handing System (DAHS). The average emission rate for the test period was 

determined to be 0.1 lb/mmBtu, and 311 lbs/hr. The FDEP allowable emission 

rate is 6.5 lbs/mmBtu based on a two hour average, and 3310 lbs/hr based on 

scenario 3 as listed in condition A.9 of the permit. 

Visible emissions were evaluated using a United Sciences, Incorporated, Model 

500C transmissometer (S/N 5001688), during both soot blowing and non-soot 

blowing testing. The 1-hour average opacity under soot blowing conditions was 

15.4%. The 1-hour average opacity under non-soot blowing conditions was 

16.0%. The FDEP allowable emission rate is 20 percent opacity. 

During the test performed on March 12, 2008, Boiler No. 1 was operated at an 

average heat input rate of 3976 mmBtu/hr and an average load of 381 

megawatts. The average quantity of fuel burned was 153.9 tons per hour. 

2 
3.0 SOURCE DESCRIPTION/TEST PROCEDURES

Big Bend Station is located on Big Bend Road, Ruskin, Florida at UTM 

coordinates East 361.9 North 3075.0. The Boiler No. 1 particulate matter 

sampling location consists of a shared circular stack 29.83 feet in diameter with 

four sample ports located 90 degrees apart on the stack circumference. These 

ports are located downstream of the electrostatic precipitator and the FGD 

scrubber. The sampling ports were determined to be 8.77 diameters 

downstream of the transition ductwork and 2.43 diameters upstream of the stack 

exit. Using these criteria, a total of 12 sampling points were chosen for 

particulate sampling as stipulated in the USEPA Method 1 test procedure. During 

this test, Boiler No. 2 was not operating, and was isolated from the FGD module. 

A diagram of the stack sampling location is included in Figure 1 along with other 

pertinent information on the test site. 

Boiler No. 1 is serviced by an electrostatic precipitator for the control of flyash 

emissions, and a flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system for control of sulfur 

dioxide emissions. 

During the test the boiler was fired with a solid fuel matrix comprised of 86.4% 

coal, 9.9% petroleum coke, and 3.8% residual. 

Particulate sampling was performed according to USEPA Method 5B 

"Determination of Nonsulfuric Acid Particulate Matter from Stationary Sources" 

Diluent gas sampling and analysis was performed according to USEPA Method 3 

"Gas Analysis for Determination of Emission Rate Correction Factor, or Excess 

Air”. Gas analysis was performed on-site using an Orsat analyzer. 

Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) data were provided by the 

Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS), Data Acquisition and 

3 
Handling System (DAHS). Averages were derived from the time frame of 7:28 

through 16:49 on March 12, 2008. This data is included as Appendix B of this 

report. 

Visible emissions were assessed using the installed Continuous Opacity Monitor 

(COM), and the CEMS DAHS. 

4 
4.0 TABULATED RESULTS

5 
Environmental Services

Air Services Group

Customer: Tampa Electric Company

Facility: Big Bend Station

Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet

Unit Under Test: Boiler #1

Test Date: March 12, 2008

Operating Conditions: Soot Blowing

Run 1s Run 2s Run 3s Test Average

Vm(std), scf 35.5941 34.8993 34.0170 34.83680

Bws, ratio 0.1347 0.1363 0.1377 0.13622

Md, lb/lb - mole 30.34 30.34 30.34 30.340

Ms, lb/lb - mole 28.68 28.66 28.64 28.659

Qs, acf/min 865541.86 849130.66 825702.59 846791.7

Qs(std), dscf/min 666779.02 653696.81 636612.44 652362.76

I, % 101.2 101.3 101.3 101.27

C, lbs/dscf 3.075E-06 2.145E-06 2.025E-06 2.415E-06

EM, lbs/hr 123.0265 84.1153 77.3578 94.83323

ER, lbs/MMBtu 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03

6 
Environmental Services

Air Services Group

Customer: Tampa Electric Company

Facility: Big Bend Station

Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet

Unit Under Test: Boiler #1

Test Date: March 12, 2008

Operating Conditions: Non-Soot Blowing

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Test Average

Vm(std), scf 35.0903 35.0194 34.3917 34.83382

Bws, ratio 0.1339 0.1393 0.1386 0.13729

Md, lb/lb - mole 30.34 30.34 30.34 30.340

Ms, lb/lb - mole 28.69 28.62 28.63 28.646

Qs, acf/min 851013.36 855803.08 838132.86 848316.43

Qs(std), dscf/min 656554.49 657202.44 645976.39 653244.44

I, % 101.4 101.1 101 101.17

C, lbs/dscf 2.761E-06 2.351E-06 1.683E-06 2.265E-06

EM, lbs/hr 108.7721 92.7164 65.2180 88.90216

ER, lbs/MMBtu 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.03

7 
BIG BEND STATION

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA FROM CEMs

Test Period Information

Start Time 7:28:00 Eastern Standard Time (EST)

Stop Time 16:49:00 Eastern Standard Time (EST)

Total Time 9:21:00

Corresponding to the time frame for the PM test.

Sulfur Dioxide Data:

RM - 19

SO2 CO2 SO2 SO2

ppmvw %, wet lb/mmBtu lbs/hr

25.241495 9.814393 0.1 311

Calculation Details

SO2, lb/mmBtu = SO2, ppmvw x Cf x Fc x (100 / CO2 %, wet)

where:

Cf = 1.6635E-07 (lb/scf)/ppm SO2

Fc = 1800 scf/mmBtu

SO2, lbs/hr = SO2, lb/mmBtu x Heat Input, mmBtu/hr

where:

Heat Input = 4032 mmBtu/hr, from Heat Input Calculation

Unit #1

WET-BOTTOM UTILITY BOILER

March 12, 2008

CEM DATA

8 
BIG BEND STATION

VISIBLE EMISSIONS DATA FROM OPACITY MONITOR

Record# DATE TIME OPACITY1 Record# DATE TIME OPACITY1

1 3/12/08 9:11 14.200 31 3/12/08 9:41 13.400

2 3/12/08 9:12 14.500 32 3/12/08 9:42 11.900

3 3/12/08 9:13 13.500 33 3/12/08 9:43 12.300

4 3/12/08 9:14 12.400 34 3/12/08 9:44 14.200

5 3/12/08 9:15 12.800 35 3/12/08 9:45 15.200

6 3/12/08 9:16 13.100 36 3/12/08 9:46 15.300

7 3/12/08 9:17 13.000 37 3/12/08 9:47 14.800

8 3/12/08 9:18 13.700 38 3/12/08 9:48 14.300

9 3/12/08 9:19 12.600 39 3/12/08 9:49 13.500

10 3/12/08 9:20 13.500 40 3/12/08 9:50 13.800

11 3/12/08 9:21 13.000 41 3/12/08 9:51 14.600

12 3/12/08 9:22 12.700 42 3/12/08 9:52 14.400

13 3/12/08 9:23 13.100 43 3/12/08 9:53 15.400

14 3/12/08 9:24 14.200 44 3/12/08 9:54 14.900

15 3/12/08 9:25 15.000 45 3/12/08 9:55 15.100

16 3/12/08 9:26 15.200 46 3/12/08 9:56 15.200

17 3/12/08 9:27 15.100 47 3/12/08 9:57 14.400

18 3/12/08 9:28 15.000 48 3/12/08 9:58 14.700

19 3/12/08 9:29 15.800 49 3/12/08 9:59 14.500

20 3/12/08 9:30 15.700 50 3/12/08 10:00 14.500

21 3/12/08 9:31 15.700 51 3/12/08 10:01 15.100

22 3/12/08 9:32 14.800 52 3/12/08 10:02 15.100

23 3/12/08 9:33 13.600 53 3/12/08 10:03 14.700

24 3/12/08 9:34 13.100 54 3/12/08 10:04 14.600

25 3/12/08 9:35 14.000 55 3/12/08 10:05 14.700

26 3/12/08 9:36 13.600 56 3/12/08 10:06 14.500

27 3/12/08 9:37 13.400 57 3/12/08 10:07 14.100

28 3/12/08 9:38 14.300 58 3/12/08 10:08 13.100

29 3/12/08 9:39 13.900 59 3/12/08 10:09 12.500

30 3/12/08 9:40 13.600 60 3/12/08 10:10 13.500

Test Average: 14.107 %

Minimum One Minute Average: 11.900 %

Maximum One Minute Average: 15.800 %

Maximum Six Minute Average: 15.417 %

Unit #1

WET BOTTOM UTILITY BOILER

SOOTBLOWING CONDITIONS

9 
BIG BEND STATION

VISIBLE EMISSIONS DATA FROM OPACITY MONITOR

Record# DATE TIME OPACITY1 Record# DATE TIME OPACITY1

1 3/12/08 11:15 12.100 31 3/12/08 11:45 15.100

2 3/12/08 11:16 12.800 32 3/12/08 11:46 14.100

3 3/12/08 11:17 12.900 33 3/12/08 11:47 13.300

4 3/12/08 11:18 13.700 34 3/12/08 11:48 13.400

5 3/12/08 11:19 14.100 35 3/12/08 11:49 13.400

6 3/12/08 11:20 15.500 36 3/12/08 11:50 13.500

7 3/12/08 11:21 15.300 37 3/12/08 11:51 13.300

8 3/12/08 11:22 15.500 38 3/12/08 11:52 13.600

9 3/12/08 11:23 15.100 39 3/12/08 11:53 14.900

10 3/12/08 11:24 16.500 40 3/12/08 11:54 16.900

11 3/12/08 11:25 17.000 41 3/12/08 11:55 15.900

12 3/12/08 11:26 15.800 42 3/12/08 11:56 16.700

13 3/12/08 11:27 15.700 43 3/12/08 11:57 17.000

14 3/12/08 11:28 13.800 44 3/12/08 11:58 14.600

15 3/12/08 11:29 14.600 45 3/12/08 11:59 14.200

16 3/12/08 11:30 15.200 46 3/12/08 12:00 14.700

17 3/12/08 11:31 13.800 47 3/12/08 12:01 14.900

18 3/12/08 11:32 14.400 48 3/12/08 12:02 14.900

19 3/12/08 11:33 13.700 49 3/12/08 12:03 14.500

20 3/12/08 11:34 12.800 50 3/12/08 12:04 14.200

21 3/12/08 11:35 13.500 51 3/12/08 12:05 14.600

22 3/12/08 11:36 14.100 52 3/12/08 12:06 15.000

23 3/12/08 11:37 14.100 53 3/12/08 12:07 14.100

24 3/12/08 11:38 13.900 54 3/12/08 12:08 14.700

25 3/12/08 11:39 15.000 55 3/12/08 12:09 15.300

26 3/12/08 11:40 15.300 56 3/12/08 12:10 14.700

27 3/12/08 11:41 14.600 57 3/12/08 12:11 15.300

28 3/12/08 11:42 15.300 58 3/12/08 12:12 14.700

29 3/12/08 11:43 15.700 59 3/12/08 12:13 15.100

30 3/12/08 11:44 15.200 60 3/12/08 12:14 16.700

Test Average: 14.672 %

Minimum One Minute Average: 12.100 %

Maximum One Minute Average: 17.000 %

Maximum Six Minute Average: 16.000 %

Unit #1

WET BOTTOM UTILITY BOILER

NON-SOOTBLOWING CONDITIONS

10 
BIG BEND GENERATING STATION

HEAT INPUT CALCULATIONS

Gross Heat Rate, Previous Month (February): 10445 KMBtu/MWh

1.0445E+07 MMBtu/MWh

MegaWatt Hour Integrator Information

Initial Integrator Reading: 177480 MWh

Final Integrator Reading: 181089 MWh

Total: 3609 MWh

Test Time Information

Testing Start Time: 7:25

Testing End Time: 16:54

Total Test Time: 9.48 hours

Calculated Heat Input

Average Unit Load, MW = MWh / hours: 380.7 MW

Heat Input, MMBtu/h = MMBtu/MWh x MW: 3976.4 mmBtu/hr

Fuel Consumption Calculation

Laboratory Sample ID: AA93556

Btu as received: 12923 Btu/lb

Tons of Fuel Consumed, Tons/hr = (mmBtu/h / Btu/lb) x 500: 153.9 Tons/hour

Unit #1

March 12, 2008

WET-BOTTOM UTILTIY BOILER

11 
5.0 FIGURES

12 
FIGURE 1

EXHAUST STACK

426.5 ’ EL.

BIG BEND GENERATING STATION

BOILERS 1 and 2

PARTICULATE TRAVERSE POINTS

OUTLET

N

PORT LOCATION PLAN

REVISED 1-18-00

COMMON STACK1 - WET TEST LOCATION

STACK DIAMETERS DOWNSTREAM

FROM DISTURBANCE = 8.77

STACK DIAMETERS UPSTREAM

FROM DISTURBANCE = 2.43

STACK DIAMETER = 29.8333 FT. ID.

STACK AREA = 699.0246 SQ. FT.

PORT LENGTH’S = 62 IN.

TRAVERSE

 POINT 

 1

 2

 3

 

 % OF

STACK DIAMETER

 IN. FROM

STACK WALL

 4.4%

14.6%

29.6%

 15.75 IN.

 52.26 IN.

105.96 IN.

 

499 ’ EL.

165 ’ EL.

261.5 ’

FGD

PRESSURIZED

 ANNULUS

72.5 ’

 

A

B C

D

9 ’ EL.

13 
APPENDIX A

PARTICULATE MATTER CALCULATIONS 
Environmental Services

Air Services Group

40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods

Reference Method 5/17

Particulate Test Calculations

Customer: Tampa Electric Company

Facility: Big Bend Station

Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet

Unit Under Test: Boiler #1

Operating Conditions: Soot Blowing

Run Number: 1s

Date: 03/12/08

Sample Time, θ: 60 minutes Nozzle Diameter, Dn: 0.270 inches

Barometric Pressure, Pb: 29.65 "Hg Nozzle Area, An: 0.000398 ft2

Stack Pressure, Ps: 29.63 "Hg Average Orifice Meter, ΔH: 1.132 "H2O

Effective Stack Area, As: 452.389 ft2 Sample Volume, Vm: 36.337 ft3

Pitot Coefficient, Cp: 0.84 dimensionless Average Meter Temp., Tm: 70.8 o

F

Gas Analysis: 13.0 % CO2 Average Stack Temp., Ts: 127.3 o

F

6.5 % O2 Average √Δp: 0.534 "H2O

0.0 % CO Condensate Volume, Vlc: 117.7 ml

80.5 % N2 Meter Box Y: 0.991 dimensionless

F-factor, Fd, for fuel: 9780 dscf/MMBtu

Data Calculated from Source Measurements:

Vw(std) = 4.707E-02 x Vlc 5.540 scf

Vm(std) = 17.647 x Vm x Y x (Pb + (ΔH / 13.6)) / (Tm +460) 35.594 dscf

Bws = Vw(std) / (Vm(std) + Vw(std)) 0.135 %

FDA = 1.0 - Bws 0.865 %

Md = (0.44 x %CO2) + (0.32 x %O2) + (0.28 x (%N2 + % CO)) 30.34 lb./lb. mole

Ms = (Md x FDA) + (18.0 x Bws) 28.68 lb./lb. mole

vs = 85.49 x Cp x (√Δp) x (√(Ts + 460) / (Ms x Ps)) 31.89 ft/second

Qs = vs x As x 60 865541.9 acf/minute

Qs(std) = Qs x FDA x (528 / (Ts + 460)) x (Ps / 29.92)) 666779.0 dscf/minute

I = (Ts + 460) x ((2.67E-03 x Vlc) + (Vm(std) / 17.647)) x 100 / (θ x Ps x An x vs x 60) 101.2 %

Data from Laboratory Analysis:

Total Particulate Weight From Laboratory Analysis: 0.049650 grams

Calculated Concentration and Emission Rate Data:

cs = (15.432 x grams) / Vm(std) 0.022 grains/dscf

grains/acf = cs x 17.647 x Ps x (FDA / (Ts + 460) 0.017 grains/acf

C = cs / 7000 3.075E-06 lbs/dscf

EM = C x Qs(std) x 60 123.0 lbs/hr

ER = C x Fd x (20.9 /(20.9 - %O2) 0.044 lbs/MMBtu
Environmental, Health, & Safety 

Notes of Findings 

Topic: Big Bend Unit # 1 Compliance Test 

 Run Number 1s (chronological run #2) 

 Apparent Failed Post-Test Leak Check 

Test Data: 12-Mar-2008 (run time 9:11 – 10:20 EST) 

Incident NotesDuring the post-test leak check, the console operator was not able to establish a 

vacuum consistent with the vacuum readings observed during the test. The 

sampling system (Dry Gas Meter, nozzle, probe, filter assembly, and impingers) 

responded as though the system was open. It was believed at the time that the 

nozzle was bumped loose during the setup for the post-test leak check. A leak 

rate for this test was unobtainable due to the severity of the leak itself. 

The nozzle was removed from the probe, and a second leak test was performed 

from the union of the nozzle/probe through the remainder of the system. This 

leak test rate was 0 cfm. The nozzle was reattached, and yet another leak check 

was performed. This third leak check returned a leak rate of 0 cfm. Initial 

consultation with the agency observer indicated that the run would be 

acceptable, based on observations and explanation of the problem. 

Data Objectives/Quality Assurance ReviewThe samples collected for this run (filter and nozzle/probe wash) were retained 

and analyzed with the rest of the samples for this test. The field data sheet was 

reviewed for completeness, legibility, accuracy, project scope data criteria, and 

reasonableness. It was noted that during the test there was no indication of any 

breach in the sampling system as evidenced by the vacuum readings recorded 

during the run. The laboratory analysis was reviewed for appropriateness. The 

nozzle and probe wash weight for this particular sample was approximately twice 

the mean of all the samples for this run, but fell with in two standard deviations 

of the mean. The filter weight was within 20 percent of the mean of all the filter 

weights in this test and well within two standard deviations of the mean. This 

sample also produced the heaviest total capture weight of this test cycle. 

FindingsBased on the incident notes and subsequent data objectives/quality assurance 

review, we recommend that this sample be included in the compliance 

determination. 

R.A.McDarby 
Environmental Services

Air Services Group

40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods

Reference Method 5/17

Particulate Test Calculations

Customer: Tampa Electric Company

Facility: Big Bend Station

Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet

Unit Under Test: Boiler #1

Operating Conditions: Soot Blowing

Run Number: 2s

Date: 03/12/08

Sample Time, θ: 60 minutes Nozzle Diameter, Dn: 0.270 inches

Barometric Pressure, Pb: 29.65 "Hg Nozzle Area, An: 0.000398 ft2

Stack Pressure, Ps: 29.63 "Hg Average Orifice Meter, ΔH: 1.103 "H2O

Effective Stack Area, As: 452.389 ft2 Sample Volume, Vm: 36.033 ft3

Pitot Coefficient, Cp: 0.84 dimensionless Average Meter Temp., Tm: 76.8 o

F

Gas Analysis: 13.0 % CO2 Average Stack Temp., Ts: 126.7 o

F

6.5 % O2 Average √Δp: 0.524 "H2O

0.0 % CO Condensate Volume, Vlc: 117.0 ml

80.5 % N2 Meter Box Y: 0.991 dimensionless

F-factor, Fd, for fuel: 9780 dscf/MMBtu

Data Calculated from Source Measurements:

Vw(std) = 4.707E-02 x Vlc 5.507 scf

Vm(std) = 17.647 x Vm x Y x (Pb + (ΔH / 13.6)) / (Tm +460) 34.899 dscf

Bws = Vw(std) / (Vm(std) + Vw(std)) 0.136 %

FDA = 1.0 - Bws 0.864 %

Md = (0.44 x %CO2) + (0.32 x %O2) + (0.28 x (%N2 + % CO)) 30.34 lb./lb. mole

Ms = (Md x FDA) + (18.0 x Bws) 28.66 lb./lb. mole

vs = 85.49 x Cp x (√Δp) x (√(Ts + 460) / (Ms x Ps)) 31.28 ft/second

Qs = vs x As x 60 849130.7 acf/minute

Qs(std) = Qs x FDA x (528 / (Ts + 460)) x (Ps / 29.92)) 653696.8 dscf/minute

I = (Ts + 460) x ((2.67E-03 x Vlc) + (Vm(std) / 17.647)) x 100 / (θ x Ps x An x vs x 60) 101.3 %

Data from Laboratory Analysis:

Total Particulate Weight From Laboratory Analysis: 0.033950 grams

Calculated Concentration and Emission Rate Data:

cs = (15.432 x grams) / Vm(std) 0.015 grains/dscf

grains/acf = cs x 17.647 x Ps x (FDA / (Ts + 460) 0.012 grains/acf

C = cs / 7000 2.145E-06 lbs/dscf

EM = C x Qs(std) x 60 84.1 lbs/hr

ER = C x Fd x (20.9 /(20.9 - %O2) 0.030 lbs/MMBtu
Environmental Services

Air Services Group

40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods

Reference Method 5/17

Particulate Test Calculations

Customer: Tampa Electric Company

Facility: Big Bend Station

Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet

Unit Under Test: Boiler #1

Operating Conditions: Soot Blowing

Run Number: 3s

Date: 03/12/08

Sample Time, θ: 60 minutes Nozzle Diameter, Dn: 0.270 inches

Barometric Pressure, Pb: 29.67 "Hg Nozzle Area, An: 0.000398 ft2

Stack Pressure, Ps: 29.65 "Hg Average Orifice Meter, ΔH: 1.043 "H2O

Effective Stack Area, As: 452.389 ft2 Sample Volume, Vm: 34.950 ft3

Pitot Coefficient, Cp: 0.84 dimensionless Average Meter Temp., Tm: 74.2 o

F

Gas Analysis: 13.0 % CO2 Average Stack Temp., Ts: 125.3 o

F

6.5 % O2 Average √Δp: 0.510 "H2O

0.0 % CO Condensate Volume, Vlc: 115.4 ml

80.5 % N2 Meter Box Y: 0.991 dimensionless

F-factor, Fd, for fuel: 9780 dscf/MMBtu

Data Calculated from Source Measurements:

Vw(std) = 4.707E-02 x Vlc 5.432 scf

Vm(std) = 17.647 x Vm x Y x (Pb + (ΔH / 13.6)) / (Tm +460) 34.017 dscf

Bws = Vw(std) / (Vm(std) + Vw(std)) 0.138 %

FDA = 1.0 - Bws 0.862 %

Md = (0.44 x %CO2) + (0.32 x %O2) + (0.28 x (%N2 + % CO)) 30.34 lb./lb. mole

Ms = (Md x FDA) + (18.0 x Bws) 28.64 lb./lb. mole

vs = 85.49 x Cp x (√Δp) x (√(Ts + 460) / (Ms x Ps)) 30.42 ft/second

Qs = vs x As x 60 825702.6 acf/minute

Qs(std) = Qs x FDA x (528 / (Ts + 460)) x (Ps / 29.92)) 636612.4 dscf/minute

I = (Ts + 460) x ((2.67E-03 x Vlc) + (Vm(std) / 17.647)) x 100 / (θ x Ps x An x vs x 60) 101.3 %

Data from Laboratory Analysis:

Total Particulate Weight From Laboratory Analysis: 0.031250 grams

Calculated Concentration and Emission Rate Data:

cs = (15.432 x grams) / Vm(std) 0.014 grains/dscf

grains/acf = cs x 17.647 x Ps x (FDA / (Ts + 460) 0.011 grains/acf

C = cs / 7000 2.025E-06 lbs/dscf

EM = C x Qs(std) x 60 77.4 lbs/hr

ER = C x Fd x (20.9 /(20.9 - %O2) 0.029 lbs/MMBtu
Environmental Services

Air Services Group

40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods

Reference Method 5/17

Particulate Test Calculations

Customer: Tampa Electric Company

Facility: Big Bend Station

Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet

Unit Under Test: Boiler #1

Operating Conditions: Non-Soot Blowing

Run Number: 1

Date: 03/12/08

Sample Time, θ: 60 minutes Nozzle Diameter, Dn: 0.270 inches

Barometric Pressure, Pb: 29.65 "Hg Nozzle Area, An: 0.000398 ft2

Stack Pressure, Ps: 29.63 "Hg Average Orifice Meter, ΔH: 1.098 "H2O

Effective Stack Area, As: 452.389 ft2 Sample Volume, Vm: 35.882 ft3

Pitot Coefficient, Cp: 0.84 dimensionless Average Meter Temp., Tm: 71.7 o

F

Gas Analysis: 13.0 % CO2 Average Stack Temp., Ts: 127.0 o

F

6.5 % O2 Average √Δp: 0.525 "H2O

0.0 % CO Condensate Volume, Vlc: 115.3 ml

80.5 % N2 Meter Box Y: 0.991 dimensionless

F-factor, Fd, for fuel: 9780 dscf/MMBtu

Data Calculated from Source Measurements:

Vw(std) = 4.707E-02 x Vlc 5.427 scf

Vm(std) = 17.647 x Vm x Y x (Pb + (ΔH / 13.6)) / (Tm +460) 35.090 dscf

Bws = Vw(std) / (Vm(std) + Vw(std)) 0.134 %

FDA = 1.0 - Bws 0.866 %

Md = (0.44 x %CO2) + (0.32 x %O2) + (0.28 x (%N2 + % CO)) 30.34 lb./lb. mole

Ms = (Md x FDA) + (18.0 x Bws) 28.69 lb./lb. mole

vs = 85.49 x Cp x (√Δp) x (√(Ts + 460) / (Ms x Ps)) 31.35 ft/second

Qs = vs x As x 60 851013.4 acf/minute

Qs(std) = Qs x FDA x (528 / (Ts + 460)) x (Ps / 29.92)) 656554.5 dscf/minute

I = (Ts + 460) x ((2.67E-03 x Vlc) + (Vm(std) / 17.647)) x 100 / (θ x Ps x An x vs x 60) 101.4 %

Data from Laboratory Analysis:

Total Particulate Weight From Laboratory Analysis: 0.043950 grams

Calculated Concentration and Emission Rate Data:

cs = (15.432 x grams) / Vm(std) 0.019 grains/dscf

grains/acf = cs x 17.647 x Ps x (FDA / (Ts + 460) 0.015 grains/acf

C = cs / 7000 2.761E-06 lbs/dscf

EM = C x Qs(std) x 60 108.8 lbs/hr

ER = C x Fd x (20.9 /(20.9 - %O2) 0.039 lbs/MMBtu
Environmental Services

Air Services Group

40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods

Reference Method 5/17

Particulate Test Calculations

Customer: Tampa Electric Company

Facility: Big Bend Station

Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet

Unit Under Test: Boiler #1

Operating Conditions: Non-Soot Blowing

Run Number: 2

Date: 03/12/08

Sample Time, θ: 60 minutes Nozzle Diameter, Dn: 0.270 inches

Barometric Pressure, Pb: 29.65 "Hg Nozzle Area, An: 0.000398 ft2

Stack Pressure, Ps: 29.63 "Hg Average Orifice Meter, ΔH: 1.123 "H2O

Effective Stack Area, As: 452.389 ft2 Sample Volume, Vm: 36.217 ft3

Pitot Coefficient, Cp: 0.84 dimensionless Average Meter Temp., Tm: 77.8 o

F

Gas Analysis: 13.0 % CO2 Average Stack Temp., Ts: 126.1 o

F

6.5 % O2 Average √Δp: 0.528 "H2O

0.0 % CO Condensate Volume, Vlc: 120.4 ml

80.5 % N2 Meter Box Y: 0.991 dimensionless

F-factor, Fd, for fuel: 9780 dscf/MMBtu

Data Calculated from Source Measurements:

Vw(std) = 4.707E-02 x Vlc 5.667 scf

Vm(std) = 17.647 x Vm x Y x (Pb + (ΔH / 13.6)) / (Tm +460) 35.019 dscf

Bws = Vw(std) / (Vm(std) + Vw(std)) 0.139 %

FDA = 1.0 - Bws 0.861 %

Md = (0.44 x %CO2) + (0.32 x %O2) + (0.28 x (%N2 + % CO)) 30.34 lb./lb. mole

Ms = (Md x FDA) + (18.0 x Bws) 28.62 lb./lb. mole

vs = 85.49 x Cp x (√Δp) x (√(Ts + 460) / (Ms x Ps)) 31.53 ft/second

Qs = vs x As x 60 855803.1 acf/minute

Qs(std) = Qs x FDA x (528 / (Ts + 460)) x (Ps / 29.92)) 657202.4 dscf/minute

I = (Ts + 460) x ((2.67E-03 x Vlc) + (Vm(std) / 17.647)) x 100 / (θ x Ps x An x vs x 60) 101.1 %

Data from Laboratory Analysis:

Total Particulate Weight From Laboratory Analysis: 0.037350 grams

Calculated Concentration and Emission Rate Data:

cs = (15.432 x grams) / Vm(std) 0.016 grains/dscf

grains/acf = cs x 17.647 x Ps x (FDA / (Ts + 460) 0.013 grains/acf

C = cs / 7000 2.351E-06 lbs/dscf

EM = C x Qs(std) x 60 92.7 lbs/hr

ER = C x Fd x (20.9 /(20.9 - %O2) 0.033 lbs/MMBtu
Environmental Services

Air Services Group

40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods

Reference Method 5/17

Particulate Test Calculations

Customer: Tampa Electric Company

Facility: Big Bend Station

Sampling Location: CS0W1 - Common Stack 1 - Wet

Unit Under Test: Boiler #1

Operating Conditions: Non-Soot Blowing

Run Number: 3

Date: 03/12/08

Sample Time, θ: 60 minutes Nozzle Diameter, Dn: 0.270 inches

Barometric Pressure, Pb: 29.67 "Hg Nozzle Area, An: 0.000398 ft2

Stack Pressure, Ps: 29.65 "Hg Average Orifice Meter, ΔH: 1.079 "H2O

Effective Stack Area, As: 452.389 ft2 Sample Volume, Vm: 35.355 ft3

Pitot Coefficient, Cp: 0.84 dimensionless Average Meter Temp., Tm: 74.8 o

F

Gas Analysis: 13.0 % CO2 Average Stack Temp., Ts: 124.8 o

F

6.5 % O2 Average √Δp: 0.518 "H2O

0.0 % CO Condensate Volume, Vlc: 117.6 ml

80.5 % N2 Meter Box Y: 0.991 dimensionless

F-factor, Fd, for fuel: 9780 dscf/MMBtu

Data Calculated from Source Measurements:

Vw(std) = 4.707E-02 x Vlc 5.535 scf

Vm(std) = 17.647 x Vm x Y x (Pb + (ΔH / 13.6)) / (Tm +460) 34.392 dscf

Bws = Vw(std) / (Vm(std) + Vw(std)) 0.139 %

FDA = 1.0 - Bws 0.861 %

Md = (0.44 x %CO2) + (0.32 x %O2) + (0.28 x (%N2 + % CO)) 30.34 lb./lb. mole

Ms = (Md x FDA) + (18.0 x Bws) 28.63 lb./lb. mole

vs = 85.49 x Cp x (√Δp) x (√(Ts + 460) / (Ms x Ps)) 30.88 ft/second

Qs = vs x As x 60 838132.9 acf/minute

Qs(std) = Qs x FDA x (528 / (Ts + 460)) x (Ps / 29.92)) 645976.4 dscf/minute

I = (Ts + 460) x ((2.67E-03 x Vlc) + (Vm(std) / 17.647)) x 100 / (θ x Ps x An x vs x 60) 101.0 %

Data from Laboratory Analysis:

Total Particulate Weight From Laboratory Analysis: 0.026250 grams

Calculated Concentration and Emission Rate Data:

cs = (15.432 x grams) / Vm(std) 0.0118 grains/dscf

grains/acf = cs x 17.647 x Ps x (FDA / (Ts + 460) 0.0091 grains/acf

C = cs / 7000 1.683E-06 lbs/dscf

EM = C x Qs(std) x 60 65.2 lbs/hr

ER = C x Fd x (20.9 /(20.9 - %O2) 0.024 lbs/MMBtu
APPENDIX B

PARTICULATE MATTER LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA 
Customer Karen Zwolak Plant Big Bend Unit 1

Method RM 5-B Stack Test Completion DateAnalyst Sam Soth Sample Number AA93556

ACETONE BEAKER 1st weighing Date 03/20/2008 Time 8:45 % RH 55.0%

2nd weighing Date 03/20/2008 Time 14:50 % RH 55.0%

3rd weighing Date Time % RH

4th weighing Date Time % RH

***Blank*** Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 1S Run 2S Run 3S

Acetone Container ID AIR AJ AIR AK AIR AI AIR AL AIR AH AIR AG AIR AA

Acetone Rinse Vol.(Va), mls 200.0000 200 200 200 200 200 200

1st Gross Wt., grams 102.3341 100.5185 99.5939 102.0838 103.0883 101.9416 104.5512

2nd Gross Wt., grams 102.3339 100.5183 99.5940 102.0835 103.0880 101.9417 104.5516

3rd Gross Wt., grams

4th Gross Wt., grams

Avg. Gross Wt., grams 102.33400 100.51840 99.59395 102.08365 103.08815 101.94165 104.55140

Tare Wt., grams 102.33325 100.50725 99.58885 102.07985 103.07260 101.93485 104.54410

Acetone Blank Wt., mg 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75

Acetone Particulate Wt., mg 10.40 4.35 3.05 14.80 6.05 6.55

Acetone Residue, mg/g 0.0047

Acetone Blank Criteria

 FILTER 1st weighing Date 03/18/2008 Time 16:25 % RH 52.0%

 Date 03/19/2008 Time 9:40 % RH 55.0%

3rd weighing Date 03/19/2008 Time 15:50 % RH 53.0%

4th weighing Date 03/20/2008 Time 8:40 % RH 55.0%

Filter/Thimble ID 203071 203064 203067 203065 203063 203069 203066

1st Gross Wt., grams 0.2510 0.2861 0.2828 0.2724 0.2862 0.2776 0.2753

2nd Gross Wt., grams 0.2512 0.2879 0.2850 0.2745 0.2880 0.2783 0.2767

3rd Gross Wt., grams 0.2511 0.2865 0.2846 0.2745 0.2871 0.2780 0.2766

4th Gross Wt., grams 0.2512 0.2865 0.2848 0.2747 0.2874 0.2781 0.2767

Avg. Gross Wt., grams 0.25110 0.28650 0.28480 0.27450 0.28725 0.27815 0.27665

Tare Wt., grams 0.25110 0.25295 0.25180 0.25130 0.25240 0.25025 0.25195

Filter Particulate Wt., mg 33.55 33.00 23.20 34.85 27.90 24.70

Difference, milligrams 0

Total Sample Particulate Wt., mg 43.95 37.35 26.25 49.65 33.95 31.25

OK to subtract acetone blank

Start Here
APPENDIX C

BOILER/PRECIPITATOR OPERATIONAL DATA











APPENDIX D

PLANT CEMS DAHS PRINTOUTS
CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21

03/12/2008 7:28 23.3 10.2

03/12/2008 7:29 23.4 10.1

03/12/2008 7:30 22.3 10

03/12/2008 7:31 21.1 9.8

03/12/2008 7:32 20.3 9.7

03/12/2008 7:33 20.2 9.7

03/12/2008 7:34 21.7 9.9

03/12/2008 7:35 21.5 10

03/12/2008 7:36 21.6 10.1

03/12/2008 7:37 22.8 10.2

03/12/2008 7:38 22.6 10.3

03/12/2008 7:39 22.2 10.2

03/12/2008 7:40 22.7 10.1

03/12/2008 7:41 23.1 10.1

03/12/2008 7:42 21.6 9.9

03/12/2008 7:43 21.6 9.7

03/12/2008 7:44 21.4 9.9

03/12/2008 7:45 22 9.9

03/12/2008 7:46 22.4 10

03/12/2008 7:47 21.6 10.1

03/12/2008 7:48 23.1 10.3

03/12/2008 7:49 25.1 10.4

03/12/2008 7:50 24.2 10.4

03/12/2008 7:51 23.3 10.4

03/12/2008 7:52 23.2 10.4

03/12/2008 7:53 22 10.2

03/12/2008 7:54 21.9 10.1

03/12/2008 7:55 21.8 10

03/12/2008 7:56 20.9 9.8

03/12/2008 7:57 20.4 9.7

03/12/2008 7:58 20.6 9.7

03/12/2008 7:59 20.8 9.8

03/12/2008 8:00 21.2 9.9

03/12/2008 8:01 22.1 10

03/12/2008 8:02 23.1 10.3

03/12/2008 8:03 23.3 10.4

03/12/2008 8:04 23.1 10.3

03/12/2008 8:05 22.7 10.2

03/12/2008 8:06 24 10.3

03/12/2008 8:07 23.3 10.2

Page 1 of 13
CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21

03/12/2008 8:08 22.6 10.1

03/12/2008 8:09 22.9 10

03/12/2008 8:10 23.4 10

03/12/2008 8:11 22.9 10

03/12/2008 8:12 23.4 9.9

03/12/2008 8:13 22.7 9.9

03/12/2008 8:14 22.5 9.8

03/12/2008 8:15 22.8 10

03/12/2008 8:16 23 10

03/12/2008 8:17 22.1 10.1

03/12/2008 8:18 21.7 10.1

03/12/2008 8:19 21.9 10.1

03/12/2008 8:20 22.3 10.2

03/12/2008 8:21 22.7 10.2

03/12/2008 8:22 19.5 9.7

03/12/2008 8:23 69.7 7.1

03/12/2008 8:24 108.3 10.6

03/12/2008 8:25 110.1 11

03/12/2008 8:26 109.9 11

03/12/2008 8:27 110.3 11

03/12/2008 8:28 110.4 11

03/12/2008 8:29 109.9 11.1

03/12/2008 8:30 101.2 10.8

03/12/2008 8:31 16.6 3.6

03/12/2008 8:32 1.4 0.3

03/12/2008 8:33 0.6 0.1

03/12/2008 8:34 0.4 0.1

03/12/2008 8:35 0 0.1

03/12/2008 8:36 -0.3 0

03/12/2008 8:37 -0.4 0

03/12/2008 8:38 164.3 3.2

03/12/2008 8:39 200.6 10.2

03/12/2008 8:40 200.6 11

03/12/2008 8:41 200.6 11

03/12/2008 8:42 200.5 11

03/12/2008 8:43 200.6 11

03/12/2008 8:44 200.7 11

03/12/2008 8:45 200.6 10.7

03/12/2008 8:46 146.8 3.6

03/12/2008 8:47 25 0.2

Page 2 of 13
CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21

03/12/2008 8:48 23.6 1.2

03/12/2008 8:49 39.2 7.8

03/12/2008 8:50 34.8 9.6

03/12/2008 8:51 33 9.8

03/12/2008 8:52 31.4 9.8

03/12/2008 8:53 30 9.9

03/12/2008 8:54 29.3 9.9

03/12/2008 8:55 29.2 9.9

03/12/2008 8:56 29 9.8

03/12/2008 8:57 28.8 9.9

03/12/2008 8:58 27.9 9.9

03/12/2008 8:59 27 9.9

03/12/2008 9:00 27.2 9.9

03/12/2008 9:01 26.9 9.9

03/12/2008 9:02 27.2 9.9

03/12/2008 9:03 27.1 10

03/12/2008 9:04 26.6 9.9

03/12/2008 9:05 24.9 9.8

03/12/2008 9:06 24.8 9.8

03/12/2008 9:07 24.7 9.8

03/12/2008 9:08 24.2 9.8

03/12/2008 9:09 24.9 9.8

03/12/2008 9:10 24.7 9.8

03/12/2008 9:11 24 9.7

03/12/2008 9:12 25.2 9.9

03/12/2008 9:13 24.6 9.8

03/12/2008 9:14 23.7 9.7

03/12/2008 9:15 24.4 9.8

03/12/2008 9:16 25.9 9.9

03/12/2008 9:17 26.7 10

03/12/2008 9:18 25.8 10

03/12/2008 9:19 25.4 10

03/12/2008 9:20 26.4 10

03/12/2008 9:21 26.8 10.1

03/12/2008 9:22 26.6 10.1

03/12/2008 9:23 26.3 10

03/12/2008 9:24 26.4 10

03/12/2008 9:25 25.9 10

03/12/2008 9:26 24.8 9.9

03/12/2008 9:27 24.5 9.9

Page 3 of 13
CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21

03/12/2008 9:28 25.1 10

03/12/2008 9:29 24 10

03/12/2008 9:30 23.9 9.9

03/12/2008 9:31 23.6 9.9

03/12/2008 9:32 22.6 9.8

03/12/2008 9:33 22.6 9.7

03/12/2008 9:34 22.6 9.7

03/12/2008 9:35 22.2 9.6

03/12/2008 9:36 23.4 9.8

03/12/2008 9:37 23.2 9.7

03/12/2008 9:38 23.7 9.8

03/12/2008 9:39 24.1 9.9

03/12/2008 9:40 24.3 9.9

03/12/2008 9:41 23.7 9.9

03/12/2008 9:42 23.8 9.9

03/12/2008 9:43 24.8 10

03/12/2008 9:44 24.2 9.8

03/12/2008 9:45 24.6 9.9

03/12/2008 9:46 25.1 9.9

03/12/2008 9:47 24.5 9.9

03/12/2008 9:48 25.2 9.9

03/12/2008 9:49 26.7 10.1

03/12/2008 9:50 24.7 10

03/12/2008 9:51 24.5 9.9

03/12/2008 9:52 24.7 10

03/12/2008 9:53 23.6 10

03/12/2008 9:54 24 10

03/12/2008 9:55 24 9.9

03/12/2008 9:56 24 9.9

03/12/2008 9:57 24.3 10.1

03/12/2008 9:58 23.7 10

03/12/2008 9:59 24.1 9.9

03/12/2008 10:00 23.9 10

03/12/2008 10:01 24.5 10

03/12/2008 10:02 24.2 9.9

03/12/2008 10:03 24.1 9.9

03/12/2008 10:04 24.2 9.9

03/12/2008 10:05 24.7 9.9

03/12/2008 10:06 25.1 10

03/12/2008 10:07 25.3 10

Page 4 of 13
CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21

03/12/2008 10:56 24.5 9.9

03/12/2008 10:57 25.3 9.9

03/12/2008 10:58 26.3 9.8

03/12/2008 10:59 24.8 9.7

03/12/2008 11:00 24.6 9.6

03/12/2008 11:01 24.7 9.6

03/12/2008 11:02 24.8 9.6

03/12/2008 11:03 24.8 9.6

03/12/2008 11:04 25.2 9.6

03/12/2008 11:05 23.7 9.6

03/12/2008 11:06 22.6 9.6

03/12/2008 11:07 23.2 9.7

03/12/2008 11:08 23.2 9.7

03/12/2008 11:09 23.2 9.7

03/12/2008 11:10 23.6 9.8

03/12/2008 11:11 23.9 9.9

03/12/2008 11:12 24 9.9

03/12/2008 11:13 25.2 9.9

03/12/2008 11:14 24.7 10

03/12/2008 11:15 25.3 10.1

03/12/2008 11:16 26.2 10.1

03/12/2008 11:17 26.8 10.1

03/12/2008 11:18 26.6 10.1

03/12/2008 11:19 26.9 10.1

03/12/2008 11:20 27.1 10.1

03/12/2008 11:21 26.7 10.1

03/12/2008 11:22 27.3 10.1

03/12/2008 11:23 27.2 10

03/12/2008 11:24 27.1 9.9

03/12/2008 11:25 26.1 9.9

03/12/2008 11:26 25.5 9.7

03/12/2008 11:27 25.2 9.6

03/12/2008 11:28 25.6 9.6

03/12/2008 11:29 24.8 9.5

03/12/2008 11:30 24.8 9.5

03/12/2008 11:31 24.9 9.6

03/12/2008 11:32 23.9 9.6

03/12/2008 11:33 24.3 9.7

03/12/2008 11:34 24.8 9.8

03/12/2008 11:35 24.4 9.8

Page 5 of 13
CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21

03/12/2008 11:36 24.6 9.8

03/12/2008 11:37 25.1 10

03/12/2008 11:38 24.9 9.9

03/12/2008 11:39 25.7 9.9

03/12/2008 11:40 26.1 10

03/12/2008 11:41 25 9.9

03/12/2008 11:42 24.4 9.9

03/12/2008 11:43 25.2 9.9

03/12/2008 11:44 24.7 9.9

03/12/2008 11:45 24.6 9.8

03/12/2008 11:46 24.4 9.7

03/12/2008 11:47 24.4 9.8

03/12/2008 11:48 23.9 9.8

03/12/2008 11:49 24.5 9.7

03/12/2008 11:50 25.5 9.9

03/12/2008 11:51 26.9 9.9

03/12/2008 11:52 27.4 10

03/12/2008 11:53 27.7 10.2

03/12/2008 11:54 26.5 10.1

03/12/2008 11:55 26.7 10.2

03/12/2008 11:56 26.4 10.2

03/12/2008 11:57 25.1 10.1

03/12/2008 11:58 25.3 10

03/12/2008 11:59 24.2 9.9

03/12/2008 12:00 24.1 9.8

03/12/2008 12:01 25 9.8

03/12/2008 12:02 24.9 9.8

03/12/2008 12:03 24.7 9.8

03/12/2008 12:04 25.6 9.8

03/12/2008 12:05 25.3 9.9

03/12/2008 12:06 26 9.9

03/12/2008 12:07 27 10.1

03/12/2008 12:08 26.4 10

03/12/2008 12:09 26.9 10

03/12/2008 12:10 27.5 10.1

03/12/2008 12:11 27.5 10.1

03/12/2008 12:12 26.4 10

03/12/2008 12:13 27 9.9

03/12/2008 12:14 26.9 10

03/12/2008 12:15 26.5 9.9

Page 6 of 13
CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21

03/12/2008 12:16 26.6 9.9

03/12/2008 12:17 26.2 9.8

03/12/2008 12:18 26.6 9.9

03/12/2008 12:19 26 9.9

03/12/2008 12:20 25.4 9.9

03/12/2008 12:21 25.1 9.9

03/12/2008 12:22 25.3 9.9

03/12/2008 12:23 24.9 10

03/12/2008 12:24 24.8 10

03/12/2008 12:25 25.7 10.2

03/12/2008 12:26 26 10.2

03/12/2008 12:27 27.3 10.3

03/12/2008 12:28 26.1 10.2

03/12/2008 12:29 26.4 10.2

03/12/2008 12:30 26.8 10.2

03/12/2008 12:31 26.7 10.1

03/12/2008 12:32 28 10.1

03/12/2008 12:33 27.1 10

03/12/2008 12:34 27.2 9.8

03/12/2008 12:35 26.6 9.8

03/12/2008 12:36 26.8 9.8

03/12/2008 12:37 28.4 10

03/12/2008 12:38 27.3 9.9

03/12/2008 12:39 28.5 9.9

03/12/2008 12:40 28.4 9.9

03/12/2008 12:41 30 10.1

03/12/2008 12:42 30.2 10.2

03/12/2008 12:43 30 10.1

03/12/2008 12:44 29.7 10.2

03/12/2008 12:45 28.6 10.2

03/12/2008 12:46 29 10.1

03/12/2008 12:47 28.1 10.1

03/12/2008 12:48 27.4 10.1

03/12/2008 12:49 27.7 10.2

03/12/2008 12:50 26.5 10.1

03/12/2008 12:51 25.6 10.2

03/12/2008 12:52 27.4 10.2

03/12/2008 12:53 28.9 10.2

03/12/2008 12:54 28.2 10.2

03/12/2008 12:55 28.8 10.1

Page 7 of 13
CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21

03/12/2008 12:56 28.7 10.1

03/12/2008 12:57 27.6 9.9

03/12/2008 12:58 28 9.9

03/12/2008 12:59 27.3 10

03/12/2008 13:00 26.6 9.8

03/12/2008 13:01 26.2 9.8

03/12/2008 13:02 26.7 9.8

03/12/2008 13:03 26.5 9.7

03/12/2008 13:04 26.5 9.8

03/12/2008 13:05 27.6 9.8

03/12/2008 13:06 28.1 9.8

03/12/2008 13:07 28.6 9.9

03/12/2008 13:08 29.4 10

03/12/2008 13:09 28 10

03/12/2008 13:10 28.5 10.1

03/12/2008 13:11 28.4 10.1

03/12/2008 13:12 27 10.2

03/12/2008 13:13 26.4 10.1

03/12/2008 13:14 26.3 10.1

03/12/2008 13:15 26 10

03/12/2008 13:16 26.7 10

03/12/2008 13:17 26.6 10

03/12/2008 13:18 26.6 9.9

03/12/2008 13:19 26.8 9.9

03/12/2008 13:20 26.7 9.9

03/12/2008 13:21 26.2 9.8

03/12/2008 13:22 27.3 9.9

03/12/2008 13:23 26.5 9.7

03/12/2008 13:24 26.3 9.7

03/12/2008 13:25 26.5 9.7

03/12/2008 13:26 26.5 9.7

03/12/2008 13:27 26.9 9.7

03/12/2008 13:28 27.5 9.8

03/12/2008 13:29 28 9.9

03/12/2008 13:30 27.9 9.9

03/12/2008 13:31 28.4 9.9

03/12/2008 13:32 27.8 10

03/12/2008 13:33 27.3 9.9

03/12/2008 13:34 26.9 9.9

03/12/2008 13:35 26 9.9

Page 8 of 13
CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21

03/12/2008 13:36 25.4 9.9

03/12/2008 13:37 25.9 9.8

03/12/2008 13:38 26.9 9.9

03/12/2008 13:39 26 9.8

03/12/2008 13:40 26.1 9.8

03/12/2008 13:41 26.6 9.8

03/12/2008 13:42 26.8 9.8

03/12/2008 13:43 26.2 9.8

03/12/2008 13:44 25.1 9.6

03/12/2008 13:45 26 9.7

03/12/2008 13:46 25.8 9.6

03/12/2008 13:47 25.7 9.7

03/12/2008 13:48 26 9.7

03/12/2008 13:49 26.2 9.7

03/12/2008 13:50 26.8 9.7

03/12/2008 13:51 26.5 9.7

03/12/2008 13:52 27.4 9.7

03/12/2008 13:53 26 9.8

03/12/2008 13:54 25.8 9.7

03/12/2008 13:55 26.4 9.7

03/12/2008 13:56 27.2 9.7

03/12/2008 13:57 26.6 9.7

03/12/2008 13:58 26.1 9.7

03/12/2008 13:59 25.6 9.7

03/12/2008 14:00 25.7 9.7

03/12/2008 14:01 26 9.8

03/12/2008 14:02 24.8 9.7

03/12/2008 14:03 25.2 9.7

03/12/2008 14:04 25.7 9.8

03/12/2008 14:05 24.9 9.7

03/12/2008 14:06 24.9 9.7

03/12/2008 14:07 25.2 9.7

03/12/2008 14:08 24.9 9.7

03/12/2008 14:09 25.7 9.8

03/12/2008 14:10 25.6 9.6

03/12/2008 14:11 24.7 9.6

03/12/2008 14:12 24.1 9.6

03/12/2008 14:13 23.8 9.4

03/12/2008 14:14 24.2 9.4

03/12/2008 14:15 24.3 9.4

Page 9 of 13
CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21

03/12/2008 14:16 23.9 9.5

03/12/2008 14:17 24.5 9.5

03/12/2008 14:18 25.6 9.6

03/12/2008 14:19 26.5 9.9

03/12/2008 14:20 27.2 9.9

03/12/2008 14:21 29.2 10.1

03/12/2008 14:22 29.3 10.2

03/12/2008 14:23 29.6 10.2

03/12/2008 14:24 28.6 10.2

03/12/2008 14:25 26.4 9.9

03/12/2008 14:26 25.9 9.9

03/12/2008 14:27 26.6 9.8

03/12/2008 14:28 25.5 9.8

03/12/2008 14:29 25 9.7

03/12/2008 14:30 25.1 9.6

03/12/2008 14:31 24.9 9.5

03/12/2008 14:32 25 9.5

03/12/2008 14:33 24.9 9.6

03/12/2008 14:34 24 9.4

03/12/2008 14:35 23.4 9.4

03/12/2008 14:36 24 9.4

03/12/2008 14:37 25.2 9.5

03/12/2008 14:38 25.6 9.7

03/12/2008 14:39 25 9.6

03/12/2008 14:40 26 9.7

03/12/2008 14:41 27 9.9

03/12/2008 14:42 27.9 10

03/12/2008 14:43 27.3 10

03/12/2008 14:44 27 10

03/12/2008 14:45 27.5 9.9

03/12/2008 14:46 27.7 9.8

03/12/2008 14:47 27 9.7

03/12/2008 14:48 25.5 9.7

03/12/2008 14:49 25 9.7

03/12/2008 14:50 24.4 9.6

03/12/2008 14:51 23.6 9.5

03/12/2008 14:52 23.4 9.4

03/12/2008 14:53 23.5 9.5

03/12/2008 14:54 23.7 9.5

03/12/2008 14:55 24.5 9.6

Page 10 of 13
CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21

03/12/2008 14:56 23.8 9.6

03/12/2008 14:57 23 9.6

03/12/2008 14:58 24.4 9.6

03/12/2008 14:59 24.1 9.7

03/12/2008 15:00 24.4 9.7

03/12/2008 15:01 25.2 9.7

03/12/2008 15:02 25.4 9.7

03/12/2008 15:03 25 9.7

03/12/2008 15:04 25.2 9.7

03/12/2008 15:05 24.5 9.6

03/12/2008 15:06 24.5 9.6

03/12/2008 15:07 25.4 9.6

03/12/2008 15:08 24.1 9.5

03/12/2008 15:09 24.4 9.6

03/12/2008 15:10 25.1 9.6

03/12/2008 15:11 25.1 9.7

03/12/2008 15:12 25.3 9.7

03/12/2008 15:13 24.7 9.6

03/12/2008 15:14 24 9.6

03/12/2008 15:15 24.3 9.6

03/12/2008 15:16 24.1 9.8

03/12/2008 15:17 24.1 9.7

03/12/2008 15:18 24 9.7

03/12/2008 15:19 24.6 9.7

03/12/2008 15:20 24.8 9.7

03/12/2008 15:21 25.1 9.7

03/12/2008 15:22 25.7 9.8

03/12/2008 15:23 25.3 9.8

03/12/2008 15:24 25.3 9.7

03/12/2008 15:25 24.5 9.7

03/12/2008 15:26 23.9 9.6

03/12/2008 15:27 25.7 9.8

03/12/2008 15:28 26 9.7

03/12/2008 15:29 24.9 9.6

03/12/2008 15:30 24.5 9.5

03/12/2008 15:31 25.1 9.6

03/12/2008 15:32 25.2 9.7

03/12/2008 15:33 25.5 9.7

03/12/2008 15:34 25.1 9.7

03/12/2008 15:35 25.4 9.7

Page 11 of 13
CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21

03/12/2008 15:36 25.3 9.8

03/12/2008 15:37 24.7 9.8

03/12/2008 15:38 24.8 9.8

03/12/2008 15:39 25.1 9.9

03/12/2008 15:40 24.6 9.9

03/12/2008 15:41 24.2 9.8

03/12/2008 15:42 24.5 9.9

03/12/2008 15:43 25 9.9

03/12/2008 15:44 24.6 9.8

03/12/2008 15:45 24.3 9.7

03/12/2008 15:46 24.1 9.6

03/12/2008 15:47 24.5 9.7

03/12/2008 15:48 24.8 9.7

03/12/2008 15:49 24.9 9.7

03/12/2008 15:50 24 9.6

03/12/2008 15:51 24.7 9.7

03/12/2008 15:52 25.4 9.8

03/12/2008 15:53 25.4 9.8

03/12/2008 15:54 25 9.7

03/12/2008 15:55 26.4 9.7

03/12/2008 15:56 26.6 9.8

03/12/2008 15:57 26.1 9.8

03/12/2008 15:58 26.7 9.8

03/12/2008 15:59 25.5 9.9

03/12/2008 16:00 25.4 9.9

03/12/2008 16:01 25.3 9.8

03/12/2008 16:02 23.7 9.7

03/12/2008 16:03 23.4 9.5

03/12/2008 16:04 23.5 9.6

03/12/2008 16:05 23.7 9.6

03/12/2008 16:06 23.8 9.5

03/12/2008 16:07 23.4 9.5

03/12/2008 16:08 22.8 9.5

03/12/2008 16:09 22.9 9.4

03/12/2008 16:10 23.8 9.4

03/12/2008 16:11 24 9.6

03/12/2008 16:12 25.1 9.8

03/12/2008 16:13 26.5 10

03/12/2008 16:14 26.5 10

03/12/2008 16:15 26.6 9.9

Page 12 of 13
CEM Data

Date Time SO21 CO21

03/12/2008 16:16 27.4 10

03/12/2008 16:17 27.8 10.1

03/12/2008 16:18 28.9 10.2

03/12/2008 16:19 29 10.2

03/12/2008 16:20 29.4 10.3

03/12/2008 16:21 29.9 10.3

03/12/2008 16:22 29.3 10.3

03/12/2008 16:23 28.2 10.1

03/12/2008 16:24 26.7 9.9

03/12/2008 16:25 24.5 9.6

03/12/2008 16:26 23.7 9.5

03/12/2008 16:27 23.1 9.4

03/12/2008 16:28 23.1 9.4

03/12/2008 16:29 23.2 9.4

03/12/2008 16:30 22.5 9.4

03/12/2008 16:31 22.1 9.3

03/12/2008 16:32 23 9.5

03/12/2008 16:33 23.3 9.6

03/12/2008 16:34 22.2 9.4

03/12/2008 16:35 22.5 9.5

03/12/2008 16:36 22.7 9.6

03/12/2008 16:37 23.6 9.6

03/12/2008 16:38 24.1 9.7

03/12/2008 16:39 24.1 9.6

03/12/2008 16:40 23.8 9.5

03/12/2008 16:41 24 9.5

03/12/2008 16:42 24.7 9.6

03/12/2008 16:43 24.3 9.5

03/12/2008 16:44 24.2 9.5

03/12/2008 16:45 23.8 9.5

03/12/2008 16:46 24.6 9.2

03/12/2008 16:47 15 2.9

03/12/2008 16:48 0.1 0.2

03/12/2008 16:49 -0.4 0

Averages: 25.2415 9.814393

Page 13 of 13
APPENDIX E

FUEL ANALYSIS 
Laboratory Services

5012 Causeway Blvd * Tampa Fl. 33619 

 Ph (813) 630-7378 * Fax (813) 630-7360 * DOH #E54272

Report For: 04/22/2008

Location Code: TE_BB_1_COMP_CO

Location Description:

Sample Collector:

Sample Collection Date:

Lab Submittal Date:

Sample Information

Big Bend 1 Compliance 03/12/2008

03/18/2008

JOHN GORHAM

Report Date:

Laboratory ID: AA93556

Laboratory Results

Coal Analysis - As Received Result Units

Lower

Limit

Upper

Limit Violation

Ash, as Received 8.49 %

BTU, as Received 11932 BTU/Lb

Carbon, as Received 65.83 %

Hydrogen, as Received 4.20 %

Nitrogen, as Received 1.38 %

Oxygen, as Received 5.64 %

Sulfur, as Received 2.89 %

Coal Analysis - Dry Basis Result Units

Lower

Limit

Upper

Limit Violation

Ash, Dry Basis 9.58 %

BTU, Dry Basis 13470 BTU/Lb.

Carbon, Dry Basis 74.32 %

Hydrogen, Dry Basis 4.74 %

Nitrogen, Dry Basis 1.56 %

Oxygen, Dry Basis 6.37 %

Sulfur, Dry Basis 3.26 %

Coal Analysis - Miscellaneous Result Units

Lower

Limit

Upper

Limit Violation

BTU, Moisture-Ash Free 14897 BTU/Lb.

Pounds SO2 / Million BTU 4.60 Lbs. SO2/MMBTU

Total Moisture 11.42 %

Report Number: -042208- 12 AA93556 Page 1 of 2 "Coal Report"
Laboratory Services

5012 Causeway Blvd * Tampa Fl. 33619 

 Ph (813) 630-7378 * Fax (813) 630-7360 * DOH #E54272

Trace Anions in Coal Result Units

Lower

Limit

Upper

Limit Violation

Chlorine as Cl, as Received 0.15 %

Chlorine as Cl, Dry Basis 0.17 %

Unit #1

Comments

Ray McDarby,

Manager, Laboratory Services

For Peggy Penner,

Report Number: -042208- 12 AA93556 Page 2 of 2 "Coal Report"
APPENDIX F

FIELD DATA SHEETS 






APPENDIX G

SAMPLING EQUIPMENT CALIBRATIONS 
SUMMARY OF EQUIPMENT CALIBRATIONS

EQUIPMENT CAL DATE METHOD RESULTS

CONSOLE (MB 07)

INITIAL 02/01/2008 USEPA RM 5 0.991

POST TEST 03/14/2008 (ORIFICE) 0.989

NOZZLE (SN09)

INITIAL 02/01/2008 CALIPER 0.270

POST TEST 03/14/2008 MEASUREMENTS 0.270

PYROMETER (PY 09) 02/01/2008 ASTM THERMOMETER + 2o

 F

PITOT TUBE (PT 09) 02/01/2008 USEPA RM 2 Cp = 0.84

BAROMETER (BR 06) 02/01/2008 NWS COMPARISON + 0.01" Hg
Environmental Services

Air Services Group

Blue Team

Manufacturer: Thermo Anderson Calibration Date:

Model Number:MST-C1 Barometric Pressure: 30.14 "Hg

Instrument Code Number: ^MB07 Theoretical Critical Vacuum: 14.22 "Hg

LabWorks Sample Number: Calibrated By:

Initial Final Total

ΔH Time Volume Volume Volume Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet

"H2O Minutes ft3 ft3 ft3

oF oF oF oF

0.60 15 226.200 233.121 6.921 81 79 80 80

1.10 15 200.900 210.118 9.218 84 80 83 80

1.90 15 165.200 176.965 11.765 83 75 84 77

3.60 15 184.100 200.186 16.086 90 78 83 80

Orifice K' Actual

Serial Orifice Vacuum Initial Final Average

Number Coefficient "Hg oF oF oF

48 0.3455 22.0 72 72 72.0

55 0.4592 20.5 72 72 72.0

63 0.5877 18.5 72 72 72.0

73 0.8022 15.5 72 72 72.0

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Calibration

Volume Volume Volume Y ΔHα

Corrected Corrected Nominal Value QA/QC Value QA/QC

Vm(std), ft3 Vcr(std), ft3 Vcr(std), ft3 (ratio) + 0.02 "H2O + 0.2

6.824 6.772 6.776 0.992 0.002 1.631 -0.097

9.071 9.001 9.006 0.992 0.001 1.687 -0.040

11.643 11.520 11.527 0.989 -0.001 1.786 0.058

15.896 15.724 15.734 0.989 -0.002 1.806 0.079

Averages: 0.991 1.727

Review/Approval:

USEPA Reference Method 5

Dry Gas Meter Calibration

Critical Orifice Method

Quarterly Calibration

02/01/2008

GDB

IMPORTANT

For valid test results, the Actual Vacuum should be 1 to 2 "Hg greater than the Theoretical Critical Vacuum Shown above.

The Critical Orifice Coefficient, K', should be in English units.

IMPORTANT

Dry Gas Meter Readings

Initial Temperatures Final Tempertures

For Calibration Y, the ratio of the reading of the calibration orifice to the dry gas meter, acceptable tolerance from average is + 0.02.

For Calibration ΔHα, the acceptable tolerance of individual values from the average is + 0.2.

4-Feb-08

Critical Orifice Readings

Ambient Temperatures

CALCULATED DATA

Critical Orifice
Environmental Services

Air Services Group

Manufacturer: THERMO Calibration Date:

Model Number:MST Barometric Pressure: 29.96 "Hg

Instrument Code Number: MB07 Theoretical Critical Vacuum: 14.13 "Hg

LabWorks Sample Number: Calibrated By:

Associated Test: Team: BLUE

Initial Final Total

ΔH Time Volume Volume Volume Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet

"H2O Minutes ft3 ft3 ft3

oF oF oF oF

1.1 10 757.800 763.890 6.090 75 72 77 73

1.1 10 763.890 769.970 6.080 77 73 77 74

1.1 10 769.970 776.070 6.100 77 74 77 74

Orifice K' Actual

Serial Orifice Vacuum Initial Final Average

Number Coefficient "Hg oF oF oF

55 0.4593 21.0 72 72 72.0

55 0.4593 21.0 72 72 72.0

55 0.4593 21.0 72 72 72.0

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Calibration

Volume Volume Volume Y ΔHα

Corrected Corrected Nominal Value QA/QC Value QA/QC

Vm(std), ft3 Vcr(std), ft3 Vcr(std), ft3 (ratio) + 0.02 "H2O + 0.2

6.041 5.966 6.006 0.988 -0.001 1.720 0.002

6.019 5.966 6.006 0.991 0.002 1.717 -0.001

6.036 5.966 6.006 0.988 -0.001 1.716 -0.002

Averages: 0.989 1.718

Prior Y: 0.991

% Difference: 0.20% + 5%

Review/Approval: Date:

BIG BEND UNIT 1

IMPORTANT

IMPORTANT

For valid test results, the Actual Vacuum should be 1 to 2 "Hg greater than the Theoretical Critical Vacuum Shown above.

The Critical Orifice Coefficient, K', should be in English units.

Ambient Temperatures

Dry Gas Meter Readings

Initial Temperatures Final Tempertures

Critical Orifice Readings

USEPA Reference Method 5

Dry Gas Meter Calibration

Critical Orifice Method

RJN

03/14/2008

POST - TEST CALIBRATION CHECK

18-Mar-08

CALCULATED DATA

For Calibration Y, the ratio of the reading of the calibration orifice to the dry gas meter, acceptable tolerance from average is + 0.02.

For Calibration ΔHα, the acceptable tolerance of individual values from the average is + 0.2.

Critical Orifice
Environmental Services

Air Services Group

QUARTERLY NOZZLE CALIBRATIONS

Shared Resource

STEEL NOZZLE SET

Calibration Date: 02/01/2008 Responsible Party: RJN

Nozzle Nozzle Diameter, Dn (cm) Maximum Average

I.D. D1 D2 D3 Difference, " Dn, inches

^SN01 0.292 0.286 0.293 0.003 0.114

^SN04 0.322 0.323 0.323 0.000 0.127

^SN05 0.379 0.380 0.378 0.001 0.149

^SN06 0.494 0.496 0.499 0.002 0.195

^SN09 0.686 0.689 0.686 0.001 0.270

^SN10 0.754 0.750 0.750 0.002 0.296

^SN12 0.985 0.979 0.982 0.002 0.387

^SN15 0.419 0.416 0.414 0.002 0.164

^SN16 0.501 0.501 0.499 0.001 0.197

^SN19 0.711 0.706 0.712 0.002 0.279

^SN22 0.934 0.935 0.932 0.001 0.368

^SN30 0.792 0.792 0.794 0.001 0.312

^SN36 0.467 0.474 0.473 0.003 0.186

^SN37 0.527 0.530 0.533 0.002 0.209

^SN38 0.628 0.632 0.633 0.002 0.248

^SN46 0.479 0.479 0.478 0.000 0.188

^SN47 0.514 0.511 0.508 0.002 0.201

^SN48 0.636 0.638 0.634 0.002 0.250

^SN50 0.788 0.784 0.784 0.002 0.309

^SN58 0.610 0.616 0.618 0.003 0.242

^SN68 0.622 0.625 0.625 0.001 0.246

^SN69 0.950 0.950 0.951 0.000 0.374

^SN70 1.561 1.558 1.553 0.003 0.613

^SN71 1.554 1.557 1.555 0.001 0.612

^SN72 0.953 0.954 0.950 0.002 0.375

^SN73 1.280 1.280 1.280 0.000 0.504

^SN74 1.230 1.231 1.230 0.000 0.484

Data Notations: All micometer readings are converted from cm to inches by multiplying by

0.393700787. Maximum Difference must be < 0.004".

QA/QC Review by:
Environmental Services

Air Services Group

POST TEST NOZZLE CALIBRATION 

Shared Resource

Calibration Date: 03/14/2008

Calibration Personnel: SEG

Test Designation: BIG BEND UNIT 1

Nozzle Nozzle Diameter, Dn (in) Maximum Average

Identifier D1 D2 D3 Difference, " Dn, inches

SN09 0.684 0.686 0.684 0.002 0.270

Quarterly (pre-test) value for nozzle ID SN09 was 0.270

Difference (Pre-test/Post-test) is: 0.000

QA/QC Review by: Date: 18-Mar-08
Environmental Services

Air Services Group

Pyrometer Calibration

Blue Team

Pyrometer Under Test

Pyrometer Number: ^PY09

Labworks Sample # 0

Calibration Date: 02/01/2008

Calibrator Information

Calibrator Type/Manufacturer: Hart Scientific

Calibrator Serial Number: AOA024

Date of Last Calibration: 04/17/2008

Calibration Personnel (Typed and Signature): SEG - RJN

Calibration Data

Calibration Reference Pyrometer

Point Temperature Indication Difference

1 400 400

2 212 212

3 32 32

Reference temperatures must encompass the expected range of measurement. These three points

should be ~ 32 degrees, ~212 degrees, and ~ 400 degrees Farenheit.

Difference is calculated as follows:

(reference temperature ) – (pyrometer indication )

Qaulity Control Data

Calibration

Point Difference

1 Fail

2 Fail

3 Fail

Reviewer: 4-Feb-08
Environmental Services

Air Services Group

_ _

s

PITOT TUBE CALIBRATION

DATA SHEET

Pitot Tube ID # PT09

Calibration Date 02/01/2008 Operating Quarter/Year: 1/08 Shared Resource

Openings Damaged? ___ Y __ N Repaired? ___ Y ___ N ___ N/A

Labworks #: 0

Alpha and Beta Angle Determinations Acceptable Limits:

α 1 1.9 degrees Pass Dt 0.48 < Dt > 0.95 cm

α 2 1.1 degrees Pass α < 10 degrees

β 1 1.6 degrees Pass (α1 measured across top impact openings)

β 2 1.8 degrees Pass (α2 measured across bottom impact openings)

β1 < 5 degrees (alongside top impact openings)

Gamma, Theta, Α, Ζ, and W Determination β2 < 5 degrees (alongside bottom impact openings)

ψ 0.1 degrees Ζ < 0.32 cm (Αsinψ)

Α 2.28 cm W < 0.08 cm (Asinο)

Ζ 0.004 cm Pass Α distance between tips

ο angle of plane on side of pitots

ο 0.3 degrees ψ angle between tips

W 0.012 cm Pass

NOTES

All measurements are taken in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A - Test Methods, 

Method 2, "Determination of stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate (Type S pitot tube)". Measurement

details are found in EPA/600/4-77/027b, "Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems:

Stationary Source Specific Methods", sub-section 3.1.1, Procuement of Apparatus and Supplies.

Comments: REMOVABLE

Calibrated by: RJN - SEG

Quality Assurance Review / Approval:
Environmental Services

Air Services Group

BAROMETER CALIBRATION

Blue Team

Instrument Number: ^BR06

Calibration Date: 02/01/2008

Calibration Personnel: SEG

Labworks #:

Barometer Reading Reference Reading Difference

Time Inches Mercury Inches Mercury "Hg

9:00 30.18 30.14 0.04

10:00 30.19 30.16 0.03

11:00 30.2 30.16 0.04

Average Difference: 0.036667

Note: Barometric readings must agree within ± 0.1 "Hg.

Current Reference is National Weather Service, TIA.

Current Conditions at Tampa International Airport

Comments (Note any adjustments):

QA/QC Review by: Date: 4-Feb-08
APPENDIX H

CHAIN OF CUSTODY 

APPENDIX I

TEST PARTICIPANTS 
TEST PARTICIPANTS

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 

AIR SERVICES GROUP

Test Team

Jorge Varino Environmental Technician, Test Team Lead 

Scott Given Associate Technician 

Gary Barber Associate Technician 

Ryan Newell Associate Technician 

Process Data

Karen Zwolak Senior Environmental Consultant – Big Bend Station 

Sample Analysis

Samraing Soth Environmental Technician 

Patrece Jackson Environmental Technician 

Ellen Demers Environmental Technician 

Project Quality Objectives & Reporting

Ray McDarby Senior Environmental Technician 

BIG BEND STATION

Test Coordination

Karen Zwolak Senior Environmental Consultant – Big Bend Station 

David A. Smith Coordinator – Air Services Group 

Byron Burrows Manager – Air Programs