alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 91.177 Minimum altitudes for IFR operations. ( a ) *Operation of aircraft at minimum altitudes.* Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, or unless otherwise authorized by the FAA, no person may operate an aircraft under IFR below— ( 1 ) The applicable minimum altitudes prescribed in parts 95 and 97 of this chapter. However, if both a MEA and a MOCA are prescribed for a particular route or route segment, a person may operate an aircraft below the MEA down to, but not below, the MOCA, provided the applicable navigation signals are available. For aircraft using VOR for navigation, this applies only when the aircraft is within 22 nautical miles of that VOR (based on the reasonable estimate by the pilot operating the aircraft of that distance); or
( 2 ) If no applicable minimum altitude is prescribed in parts 95 and 97 of this chapter, then— ( i ) In the case of operations over an area designated as a mountainous area in part 95 of this chapter, an altitude of 2,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal distance of 4 nautical miles from the course to be flown; or
( ii ) In any other case, an altitude of 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal distance of 4 nautical miles from the course to be flown.
( b ) *Climb.* Climb to a higher minimum IFR altitude shall begin immediately after passing the point beyond which that minimum altitude applies, except that when ground obstructions intervene, the point beyond which that higher minimum altitude applies shall be crossed at or above the applicable MCA.
[Doc. No. 18334, 54 FR 34294, Aug. 18, 1989, as amended by Amdt. 91-296, 72 FR 31678, June 7, 2007; Amdt. 91-315, 75 FR 30690, June 2, 2010]
102083"

ESTCerg

NY NYIYBMYS.
ava

iy u |
a etl fD
pa
a

i
i
i
i

POPOPOPD TOE MERE DEN Fs

Wey
.

-‘

. 

### 262,I.. ’ I’

-- ’ 

### 263

prov~lms hfm3of &all not apply to ofttcia, towns, an3 villages

aad epaeial

eobooldlat&ots, 054 iadepmdent RJJIOO~ xUatrict8,

ualerrs and until tb.8

gsvernln~

bodr of any such city, tom, or village,

or ageoialochooldietrLot, or inCepcmdmt s.3moldistz3ct f1M.q that ~usual OF flxc8salYe

defaultIn tthb

pa-t of sd valaq andpolltilzes

ha3 ouaurred,andtbatan bxten6lo.n of t3.m for the ?smt of suah del.tnqwnt ad valorrsa

nd poll tsxeavi11 >xmote azzdaocelcrate the colloctlm ibcmof, vheroqxm euch gpverning

b&y 82uLl a&z& a r-esolutio~ ~2 opdinice eo2dumlng awzh.flndSng, aad ~p:poo

t&e rettordlngof such findIngs of fact the praialms of t.haAat 0ba.u -m 321 full f0me aw 

### emct a6 toany-swhoXty, tovq, or village, Or epeaial pchool district, or indepandent ochooldistrict. Et is her&y e~ressly anb sgacifically provided t&t penaltiee

and fnteawt herein released we mleaeed anl~ ox.deliwuentad valorea and poll tsFies 'ant3 011 no other taxes.Jresh. While the language used is p%x?haps

not as olem w &&at have been used, we believe thzbt Seation

3 uao mt to &we this efreot: (1) If mm9 than cm3 year9 wea we delinque.& tha-tamayermay not have the beaeflt 0s the roleuse if be pSg8 fox me rfxar only or if he pays for&ny nmbcr of year8 lese thim ~11; and f2) ii he we8 -0s ilollmpmt cn sevexol piecaa of propa?tg hs msy %jngle out cme pl6Ceand.Paythe dollnqusnt tax88 assessed agaast it, titbout pagiagathor dollnqutrnt ad valorem

and Pollta%eswtig by &la, but I!! zwch a cam of thus ~az?u &y a part of the d%lLnque& tams ovingby him he ulll hayeto pay a @ PenaltY. It dcms not a?puar to w that any ~tontial 14 rLl%x#hst in sactica3 to 1oY-y tEe c-$3 yQaltyvher8cll thedelinQuenttaxes wfnfjbyaau3&are' g&la. Ratherit Be%ras to us that the penaltyis l-ted to those GUS%8 VhePe t&3 ~operty oM8r choores**to** sS@?egatea partof.hlq **property** and pay,on it alone;. .~ .~ ; ,:

Our' opinl~ 18 that uder the Act no pemEity,m d%lfaquMt bXQS **VI=** be Char@X%ble by the State and County, or by OtEorgoUtica subfflvlsioaa adoPtIngthe Aat; where, a pcraan

pays all thid%linquwt ad valoromaad Poll t&es owingbyhlm. IS he pays all tha.dollnque& ta.sea.due em
. 

### a part0r lxlaproperty mly, thm leaving a.pcz?t of hi8 deUnquanttaxes unF%dhemastpaya 6$pcnMtycinthatpaid,
#### Frederick J. Young, as Receiver of International Exchange Bank, Appellant, *v.*Antonio DiStefano, Respondent.

Argued March, 15, 1937;

decided April 20, 1937.

*664
      *Martin Conboy, David Asch*and *William J. Butler*for appellant.

*Joseph Aranow*and *Alfred Zwoden*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Rubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




Amendment #2 To The

Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc.




Employment Agreement




          THIS AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”), is made and entered into as of August 20, 2009 by and
between Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc., on its behalf and on behalf of all of its subsidiaries and
affiliated corporations or associations (“Affiliates”), located at 375 North Willowbrook Road,
Coldwater, Michigan 49036 (collectively referred to as the “Company”), and Donald L. Denney
(“Executive”).




          WHEREAS, the Executive serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the
Company’s Affiliate, Monarch Community Bank (the “Bank”) pursuant to the terms of an employment
agreement dated September 20, 2006 (the “Agreement”); and




          WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to amend the Agreement to provide that the
Executive will be entitled to be paid directors fees on the same terms and conditions that apply to
other member’s of the Company’s and the Bank’s Board of Directors; and




          WHEREAS, except as otherwise provided in this Amendment, the Agreement shall continue in full
force and effect.




          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the covenants herein and for other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
Company, the Bank and the Executive agree to amend the Agreement as follows:



1. Effective September 1, 2009, Section 2 of the Agreement is amended to provide as follows:





     2. Service on the Boards of Directors. During the Term of this Agreement (as defined in
Section 8 hereof), the Company agrees to nominate Executive as a nominee to serve on the
Company’s Board of Directors. During the Term of this Agreement, the Company, in its capacity
as sole shareholder of the Bank, agrees to cause Executive to be elected as a director of the
Bank. Executive shall be entitled to receive fees for serving as a director on the same terms
and conditions that apply to other members of the Board of Directors of the Bank and other
members of the Board of Directors of the Company.



 









 





          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above
written.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	MONARCH COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.	 	 	 	EXECUTIVE
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Stephen M. Ross
	 	 	 	/s/ Donald L. Denney	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Stephen M. Ross
	 	 	 	DONALD L. DENNEY	 	 
	 

	 	Its: Chairman
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 21.1

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF ACTUATE CORPORATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
        Subsidiary Name                      Incorporated/Formed In
        ---------------                      ----------------------
 <S>                               <C>
 Actuate Australia Pty Limited     Australia
 Actuate Canada Corporation        Canada
 Actuate Cayman Limited            Cayman Islands
 Actuate Corporation PTE Limited   Singapore
 Actuate France, S.A.              France
 Actuate Germany GmbH              Germany
 Actuate Holding, B.V.             The Netherlands
 Actuate International SARL        Switzerland
 Actuate Japan Co., Ltd.           Japan
 Actuate Limited                   Hong Kong
 Actuate UK Ltd                    United Kingdom
 Actuate International Corporation State of Delaware, United States of America
 Tidestone Corporation             State of Kansas, United States of America
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 466 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 466

     To provide that certain guidance related to waivers for State 
 innovation under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act shall 
                        have no force or effect.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2019

  Mr. Warner (for himself, Mr. Cardin, Mrs. Shaheen, and Ms. Baldwin) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide that certain guidance related to waivers for State 
 innovation under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act shall 
                        have no force or effect.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Americans with Pre-
existing Conditions Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. PROVIDING THAT CERTAIN GUIDANCE RELATED TO WAIVERS FOR STATE 
              INNOVATION UNDER THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE 
              CARE ACT SHALL HAVE NO FORCE OR EFFECT.

    Beginning April 1, 2019, the Secretary of Health and Human Services 
and the Secretary of the Treasury may not take any action to implement, 
enforce, or otherwise give effect to the guidance entitled ``State 
Relief and Empowerment Waivers'' (83 Fed. Reg. 53575 (October 24, 
2018)), and the Secretaries may not promulgate any substantially 
similar guidance or rule.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate
general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    LEO F. WELLS,
III                                   
|Leo F. Wells, III Chief
Executive Officer August 10, 2006  
|                                                           
|/S/    DOUGLAS P.
WILLIAMS                                 
|Douglas P. Williams Chief Financial Officer August 10, 2006
#### § 35.2 Propeller configuration.

The applicant must provide a list of all the components, including references to the relevant drawings and software design data, that define the type design of the propeller to be approved under § 21.31 of this chapter.

[Amdt. 35-8, 73 FR 63346, Oct. 24, 2008]
##### 





EXHIBIT 99(a)


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delphi
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, J. T. Battenberg III, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| |    |                                                                                                                                                             
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|
| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.



| |                                          
| | -----------------------------------------
| | /s/ J. T. BATTENBERG III                 
| |                                          
| | J. T. Battenberg III                     
| | Chairman of the Board,                   
| | Chief Executive Officer and
    President

July 17, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

The Federal Communications Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on the subject listed below on Monday, May 15, 2000, following the Open Meeting, which is scheduled to commence at 9:30 a.m., in Room TW-C305, at 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC.

### Item No., Bureau, and Subject

1—Enforcement—Title: Report on Pending Common Carrier Investigations.

Summary: The Enforcement Bureau will report to the Commission on several pending common carrier investigations.

This item is closed to the public because it concerns investigatory matters. (See 47 CFR Sec. 0.603(g)).

The following persons are expected to attend: Commissioners and their Assistants, Managing Director, The Secretary, Enforcement Bureau Chief and members of his staff, General Counsel and members of his staff, Common Carrier Bureau Chief and members of his staff.

Action by the Commission May 8, 2000. Commissioners, Kennard, Chairman; Ness, Furchtgott-Roth, Powell and Tristanti voting to consider these matters in Closed Session.

Additional information concerning this meeting may be obtained from Maureen Peratino or David Fiske, Office of Media Relations, telephone number (202) 418-0500; TTY (202) 418-2555.

Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-12003  Filed 5-9-00; 2:18 pm]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

RONALD L. GLAZER AND LAURA L. 

GLAZER,

Petitioners

v.

BERNARD A. MOORE, SJ; COURT 

ADMINISTRATION-CIVIL DIVISION,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 79 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of July, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Review in the Nature of a Mandamus is 

DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the 

caption.
November, 2011

SUMMARY OF FROTH-PAKTM INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE STUDIES DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4979

_____________________________
Y

VENS F ELIX , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alac hua County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

. November 6, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , W INOKUR , and J AY , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

______ _______________________2 Yvens Felix, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Barbara Debelius, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Unassociated Document


    
      
        

        

      

      EXHIBIT
10.4

      


      


      


      
 

      FORM
OF CONVERTIBLE

      PREFERRED
STOCK OF

      PHYSICIANS
HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.

       

       

       

       

       

      
 

      
        
           


        

        
          1

          
            

          

        

        
           


        

      


      [PhyHealth
Logo]

       

      
        	 	 	 
	Certificate
      Number  	 	Shares
	 	
                 

              	 
	 	 	 
	
                PAR
      VALUE $0.001

                PREFERRED
      STOCK  

              	 	CUSIP No. 71943J 10
      9


      

       

       

      
        	THIS CERTIFIES
      THAT	SPECIMEN


      

       

      Is The
Owner on

      


      FULLY PAID AND NON-ACCESSIBLE SHARES OF
THE PREFERRED STOCK PAR VALUE OF $0.001 EACH OF PHYSICIANS HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT
GROUP, INC. TRANSFERABLE ON THE BOOK OF COPRORATION IN PERSON OR BY DULY
AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY UPON SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE PROPERY
ENDORSED.  THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT VALID UNTIL COUNTERSIGNED BY THE
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTERED BY THE REGISTRAR.

      


      WITNESS
THE FACSIMILE SEAL OF THE CORPORATION AND THE FACSIMILE SIGNATURES OF ITS DULY
AUTHORIZED OFFICERS.

      


       

      
        	 	DATED:	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
                RICHARD
      E. GOULDING, MD

              	
                COUNTERSIGNED AND
      REGISTERED:

              	 
	    Secretary 	ISLAND STOCK
      TRANSFER 	 
	 	
                Transfer
      Agent        
    
 	 


      

       

       

      
        	
                ROBERT
      L. TRINKA 

              	 	Authorized
      Signature	 
	President 	 	
                100 Second Avenue
      South, Suite 300N, St. Petersburg, FL 33701

                727.289.0010

              	 
	 	 	 	 


      

       

      


      [CORPORATE
SEAL]


      
        
           


        

        
          2
#### § 431.91 General.

An applicant shall provide the FAA with sufficient information to analyze the environmental impacts associated with proposed operation of an RLV, including the impacts of anticipated activities to be performed at its reentry site. The information provided by an applicant must be sufficient to enable the FAA to comply with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.,* the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act, 40 CFR parts 1500-1508, and the FAA's Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts, FAA Order 1050.1D. Copies of FAA Order 1050.1D may be obtained from the Office of Environment and Energy, AEE-300, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, (202) 267-3553. Copies of FAA Order 1050.1D may be inspected in the Rules Docket at the Federal Aviation Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel, AGC-200, Room 915G, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591 weekdays between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
#### New York Foundation, Respondent, *v.*The People of the State of New York, Appellant.

(Argued May 29, 1936;

decided July 8, 1936.)

*453
      *John J.*Bennett, Jr., *Attorney-General (L. Hamilton Rainey*of counsel), for appellant.

*Charles J. Nehrbas*and *Harry Rodwin*for respondent.

*Morgan J. O’Brien*and *Charles S. Noyes*for Justin C. O’Brien Realty Corporation, *amicus curise.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Actuate Corporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge on the date hereof, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated March 19, 2007



|                                                                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    PETER I. CITTADINI                                                                                                    
|Peter I. Cittadini President and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)                                       
|                                                                                                                             
|/s/    DANIEL A. GAUDREAU                                                                                                    
|Daniel A. Gaudreau Senior Vice President, Operations and
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Falconer, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-3597.] 

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. FALCONER. 

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Falconer, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 

2021-Ohio-3597.] 

(No. 2020-0227—Submitted October 5, 2021—Decided October 7, 2021.) 

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 

____________________ 

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of a 

motion to purge contempt and an application for reinstatement by respondent, 

Christine Lynn Falconer, Attorney Registration No. 0069256, last known business 

address in Carrollton, Ohio. 

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 12, 2021, 

wherein the court found respondent in contempt of its March 31, 2020 order and 

suspended her for failing to pay board costs, finds that respondent has 

substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. 

V(24). 

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that the motion to purge

contempt is granted and that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the 

state of Ohio. 

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be 

made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2). 

{¶ 5} For previous case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Falconer, 160 Ohio 

St.3d 1208, 2020-Ohio-1194, 153 N.E.3d 126. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART,

and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. 

_________________