alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofthe Company for the period ended September 30, 2003, I, Anthony J. Gould, ExecutiveVice President, Chief Financial and Chief Accounting Officer of  the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  that:

 

(1)                                  suchQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedSeptember 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company forthe period ended September 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Western SierraBancorp.

 

 
| Dated:  November 10, 2003 |                                   |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                |                                   |
|                                | /s/ Anthony J. Gould                   |   |
|                                | Chief Financial and Accounting Officer |   |

 

----
FAA - 2011 - 0573

From Delta Airlines: Hi Sanjay, Appreciate the clarification about 'new' parts. Hope all is well out in SEA. Thank you, Greg Greg Blake Manager - A319/A320 Fleet Engineering Delta Air Lines ph) 612 - 266 - 7503 ** note new number fax) 612 - 970 - 7339 greg.blake@delta.com

----- Original Message ----- From: Sanjay.Ralhan@faa.gov [mailto:Sanjay.Ralhan@faa.gov] Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 1:00 PM To: Rosamilia, Kirsten Cc: 9 - ANM - 116 - AMOC - REQUESTS@faa.gov; Ciasullo, Andrea; Delta, ChiefEngin eer; Hill, Douglas R; Engineering Standards; Blake, Greg E; Ead, Souhail J; Keith.A.Frable@faa.gov; Sam.Varajon@faa.gov; Thomas.Stafford@faa.gov Subject: Re: Delta Airbus AMOC Request Letter 11 - 124 Hello Kirsten, I have done a quick review of your reques t. The issue you addressed has been brought to my notice earlier by another operator as well so I will be posting this comment with my disposition on the FDMS upon closure of comment period of this IAR. Basically I agree that my intent of word "new" includ es serviceable units. I don't think an AMOC will be necessary however, if flight standards require it then it can be done. How urgent is your requirement ? I will be out of office starting tomorrow returning on August 15, 2011. Sanjay Ralhan Program Ma nager - International Branch Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Services Federal Aviation Administration Phone: 425 - 227 - 1405 E - mail: Sanjay.Ralhan@faa.govFrom: "Rosamilia, Kirsten" <Kirsten.Rosamilia@delta.com> To: Keith A Frable/ASO/FAA@FAA, Sam Varajon/AGL/FAA@FAA, Sanjay Ralhan/ANM/FAA@FAA,

9 - ANM - 1 16 - AMOC - REQUESTS/ANM/FAA@FAA Cc: "Delta, ChiefEngineer" <ChiefEngine er.Delta@delta.com>, "Ciasullo, Andrea"

<Andrea.Ciasullo@delta.com>, Engineering Standards <engstandards@delta.com>, "Ead, Souhail J"

<jim.ead@delta.com>, "Blake, Greg E" <greg.blake@delta.com>, "H ill, Douglas R"

<douglas.hill@delta.com> Date: 07/28/2011 09:49 AM Subject: Delta Airbus AMOC Request Letter 11 - 124 Keith, AMoC request 11 - 124 and attachments are provided for your review. Following your review please forward your comments to Sanjay Ralhan at the Seattle ACO. Additionally, hard copies are in the mail. Thank you in advance for your attention to this request. Should you have any questions or requi re additional information, please contact Jim Ead, Sr. Principal Engineer - Delta Air Lines; telephone (612) 266 - 7523, email jim.ead@delta.com. Your expeditious review is greatly appreciated. Thank you, Kirsten Kirsten Rosamilia Delta Air Lines, Inc., D5 74 Program Mgr - AD/Regulatory Programs Phone:404 - 714 - 1161 Fax:404 - 773 - 5465 kirsten.rosamilia@delta.com
*>i<>i(*>«x<>io«x<*>i.*>t<>K * -COriM . JOURNfiL - *x<»<**»<>i<>!<****x<>«>)<x<x<>i<) « DfiT E Mfi'Y'-02-2B0 0 *>!<»<* * TIM E 10:5 5 ** * p.0 1 STftRT=MflY-0 2 10:5 4 END=nRY-0 2 10:5 5 MOD E = MEMOR Y TRfiNSMJSSIO N

• FIL E NG. = B1 6 . ST NNO . , CO M fiBBR NO . STATIO NNfiME/TEL.NO . PfiGE S DURRTIO N 00 1 O K S 91501982228 0 002/00 2 00:00'48 " -SUPERFUN D DI U • >K>!,**>«*X.>K>K**>X***>t.*>t.»oX»,****>X********* * - - *>K>^* * _2146656460 - ******** *



## SUPERFUN D BRANCH OFFIC EO FREGIONALCOUNSEL U.S . EPA REGIO N 6 144 5 Ros s Avenue , Ste . 120 0 Dallas , Texa s 75202-273 3 Telephon e No . (214 ) 665-2134 , 213 5 Telefa x No . (214 ) 665-646 0 

# zF^'^' %

TO : COMMENTS : FACSIMILETRANSMISSI O FROM : SUBJ : 2^^ ^ (^ ^ <g <



# ^^^'^P^' Y ^^.^c ^ <^XZAlZ14^..^t

y ^Mz/TOX P>^&^^M.^L

_/gp ^ ,o4 ^ x772^7 ^

TOTA LNO . PAGES : SEN T BY : 

# P . DATE/TIME 

## ^7P4^ ^ ^^7. 3 905035 9
$10,000.00
 	
            August 31, 2009
 





 


PROMISSORY NOTE


 


As hereinafter agreed, Wasatch Food Services, Inc., jointly and severally, promises to pay to the order of Hobble Creek Investments, Inc., Ten Thousand Dollars and no cents ($10,000.00).  And it is hereby agreed that said amount $10,000 shall be payable upon demand.  Interest shall accrue at the rate of Eight Percent (8%) per annum will be charged on the unpaid balance until the whole amount of the principal and interest is paid.  There shall be no penalty for early payment of this note.  


 


Should default be made in the payment of the demand note then the whole unpaid amount shall become immediately due and payable; and in the event default is made and said note is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection or suit is brought on the same, the undersigned agrees to pay all costs and attorney’s fees that might be incurred.  If there is a lawsuit, borrower agrees upon lenders request to submit to the jurisdiction of the county of Utah County, the State of Utah.  This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Utah.


 


 


UNDERSIGNED:


Ben Peay


 





	
             
 	
            /s/ Ben Peay  
 





Ben Peay, President


Wasatch Food Services, Inc.
03534
x
.
03621
36,
} + 00. :
0 3659
O38
03746
|
|
|
|
© 3849
is
|
03939
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| © 3987
|
|
= = ee 2
|
\
‘Q
| %o,
O 3993 |
i | 0 3889

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, 1963 SCALE 1:24000
: 0 1 MILE
* ¥ x = iy
on 0 c 100¢ f 400¢ 500C e000 7000 FEET

r a
| / Fr: 1 KILOMETER
Hl .

1:46" |! 7249 wits |
3rMiLs} |
NeW MExICO|

/ J

COAL RESOURCE OCCURRENCE MAP OF THE FLORA VISTA QUADRANGLE,
SAN JUAN COUNTY, NEW MEXICO

BY
DAMES & MOORE
1979

_l

S00,

=

Compiled in 197.9

OPEN FILE REPORT 79-1116

PLATE 5 OF 8
EXPLANATION
3500
3600
STRUCTURE CONTOUR: Drawn on top of the
Fruitland 1 coal Contour i 1

100 (30.5 me
sea level. Conto:
jected through noncoa:

03636

DRILL HOLE - Showing altitude at the top
of the Fruitland 1 coal bed, in feet.

To convert feet to meters, multiply feet
by 0.3048.

Fruitland coal beds contoured as a single
surface on thie map are equivalent in
etrati, ic position but may not be

This map was prepared under contract to the U.S.
Geological Survey and has not been edited for
conformity with Geological Survey editorial stand-
ards. Opinions and conclusions expressed herein
do not necessarily represent those of the Geo-
logical Survey.

PLATE 5

STRUCTURE CONTOUR MAP
OF THE FRUITLAND 1! COAL BED
§ 406.165 Argument before the administrative law judge. ( a ) *Argument during the hearing.* During the hearing, the administrative law judge must give the parties a reasonable opportunity to present arguments on the record supporting or opposing motions, objections, and rulings if the parties request an opportunity for argument. The administrative law judge may request written arguments during the hearing if the administrative law judge finds that submission of written arguments would be reasonable.
( b ) *Final oral argument.* At the conclusion of the hearing and before the administrative law judge issues an initial decision in the proceedings, the parties are entitled to submit oral proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, exceptions to rulings of the administrative law judge, and supporting arguments for the findings, conclusions, or exceptions. At the conclusion of the hearing, a party may waive final oral argument.
( c ) *Post-hearing briefs.* The administrative law judge may request written post-hearing briefs before the administrative law judge issues an initial decision if the administrative law judge finds that submission of written briefs would be reasonable. If a party files a written post-hearing brief, the party must include proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, exceptions to rulings of the administrative law judge, and supporting arguments for the findings, conclusions, or exceptions. The administrative law judge must give the parties a reasonable opportunity, not more than 30 days after receipt of the transcript, to prepare and submit the briefs.
[Nos. 26838-8-II; 27051-0-II.

Division Two.

December 31, 2002.]

#### Meghan Bottemiller, et al., *Appellants,*v. Gentle Dental Service Corporation, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 97-2-00995-6, Edwin L. Poyfair, J., entered January 5, 2001. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Hunt, C.J., and Bridgewater, J.
Exhibit 10.29



BUFFALO WILD WINGS, INC.

EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009



The base salaries for the Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. executive officers for fiscal year 2009 are set forth below.  In addition, the executive officers participate in our 401(k) plan and medical and disability plans, as well as other compensatory plans, contracts and arrangements which are filed as exhibits to our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2008.



Executive Officer and Title

        2009 Annual Base SalarySally J. Smith


        $560,000Chief Executive Officer and PresidentMary J. Twinem

        $350,000Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerJames M. Schmidt

        $295,000Executive Vice President, General Counsel and SecretaryJudith A. Shoulak

        $295,000Senior Vice President, OperationsKathleen M. Benning

        $252,000Senior Vice President, Marketing and Brand DevelopmentLinda G. Traylor

        $248,000Senior Vice President, Human ResourcesMounir N. Sawda

        $227,000Senior Vice President, Franchise and Development








---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6785

JOHN KENNEDY ROBINSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-97-688-AM) Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 5, 1999 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.James Clyde Clark, LAND, CLARK, CARROLL & MENDELSON, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia; Wm. Lee Robinson, Macon, Georgia, for Appellant. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John Kennedy Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Robinson v. Angelone , No.CA-97-688-AM (E.D. Va. May 7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 20375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8686]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Meetings of Humanities Panel

AGENCY: The National Endowment for the Humanities

ACTION: Notice of additional meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that the 
following meeting of the Humanities Panel will be held at the Old Post 
Office, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael P. McDonald, Advisory 
Committee Management Officer, National Endowment for the Humanities, 
Washington, DC 20506; telephone (202) 606-8322. Hearing-impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter may be obtained 
by contacting the Endowment's TDD terminal on (202) 606-8282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed meeting is for the purpose of 
panel review, discussion, evaluation and recommendation on applications 
for financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and 
the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including discussion of 
information given in confidence to the agency by the grant applicants. 
Because the proposed meeting will consider information that is likely 
to disclose trade secrets and commercial or financial information 
obtained from a person and privileged or confidential and/or 
information of a personal nature the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, pursuant 
to authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to 
Close Advisory Committee meetings, dated July 19, 1993, I have 
determined that these meetings will be closed to the public pursuant to 
subsections (c)(4), and (6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States 
Code.
    1. Date: April 20, 2011.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Location: Room 315.
    Program: This meeting will review applications for Landmark 
Workshops for School Teachers and Community College Faculty, submitted 
to the Division of Education Programs at the March 1, 2011 deadline.

Michael P. McDonald,
Advisory Committee, Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-8686 Filed 4-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION   906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Advanstar Communications Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David W. Montgomery, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Report, and as of the end of the
period covered by the Report:

|By: |  | /s/DAVID W. MONTGOMERYDavid W. Montgomery
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

March
28, 2003

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This
certification is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code. This certification shall not to be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section. This certification does not constitute a part of Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K accompanying this certification and to which it is an exhibit.

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Capital Bank Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, B. Grant Yarber,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ B. Grant Yarber
------------------------
B. Grant Yarber
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 3, 2004

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      -42-
### Draft cost memo for P &R I Penny Lassiter to: Cortney

_ Higgins 03/25/2011 05:46 PM Cc: Nick Parsons, Mary Kissell, Ann Johnson

Cortney,

I wanted to go ahead and send you this draft cost memo since I committed this morning to get this to you. As you can see, we still need to add the detailed cost tables into the Appendix 1, and we'll do that on Monday and send you the revised, complete memo once we complete all of our QA of those detailed tables.

Penny Lassiter Group Leader Refining and Chemicals Group (D205-01) Sector Policies and Programs Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 (919) 541-5396
#### BENES v BURKE

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co.

No. 9857.

Decided June 10, 1929

Ven Svarc and' W. H. Miller, both of Cleveland, for Benes.

N. N. Pierce, Esq., Cleveland, for Burke.

HISTORY:-Action in Municipal Court by Benes v Burke to recover damages received by reason of automobile collision. Directed verdict for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

*396VICKERY, PJ.

We think that a jury question was involved in this lawsuit as shown from the record, and the court might have come to the same conclusion had the defendant been compelled to introduce his testimony, but there may have been evidence brought out on the defendant’s side that would have strengthened the plaintiff’s case. At any event, at that time there was evidence, which would tend to prove a liability against the defendant in favor of the plaintiff and there was more than a scintilla of evidence to show negligence.

The fact that the defendant did not stop at the Boulevard stop, that he did not pay any attention to the horn of the plaintiff, and that the contact of the car car shows the plaintiff apparently reached the point first, or at least that the plaintiff had as much right to be there as the defendant had, inasmuch as it was a main thoroughfare and Fairmont Road ran into it, it seems to us that it was a question for the jury after hearing all the evidence or for the court in the absence of the jury after hearing all the evidence, to determine which had the right of way and which one, if either, was negligent.

We, therefore, think that the judgment of the court at that stage was wrong and must be reversed. Judgment reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for a new trial.

Sullivan and Levine, JJ, concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MICHIGAN EDUCATIONAL
EMPLOYEES MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND FOR
THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       121,926,696
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             123,835,511
<CASH>                                       5,698,453
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           6,669,528
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         335,934
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             243,520,937
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             94,633,751
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         33,172,891
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             37,717,331
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  53,472,069
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               243,520,937
<PREMIUMS>                                  33,769,688
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          3,519,146
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (2,558)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 773,763
<BENEFITS>                                  24,062,152
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         7,036,457
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,586,302
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,537,278
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,049,024
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                127,286
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,176,310
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>