alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
prelsdS sie cs Cole Oe)

2 dO 2 La3HS

6 Biv ld

GLET U! payidwog

T. 31a.3 RB. 12 Ww.

T. 30 N., R. 12 W.

fT. 29 B.
R. 12 W.

@ a)

@

® 6

)

@

@ ©

AZTEC OIL & GAS BETA EL PASO NATURAL BETA BETA BETA BETA BETA ‘TEXACO INC. AZTEC OIL & GAS AZTEC OIL & GAS
#8, EAST #1, STATE UNIT “A” #F-1, BOLACK #1, KATE STANDAGE #1, LEORA. WALLACE #1 JOSE JAQUEZ #1 KATHERINE PIERCE #1, PAUL PALMER #LON.M. COM N 40-1, McGRATH #1, YOUNG "D"
NW, SEX SE: Sec. 26 NW: SEX SWi Sec. 36 ‘SW NEK SW Sec.1 SE NW SE: Sec, 12 NW SEK SWE Sec.14 NW NE SW Sec.24 SEk NW NE Sec. 26 NEX NWe SW Sec. 26 NE SW NW; Sec. 36 NW SEK SEL Sec. 34 SE: NW NW Sec.2
5927" 5910" 5728" 5677" 5552" 5525' 5640" 5627" 5760' 5774" 5842"
PX} 5. XX 0 PX 0 PX] sn DY seo DX oo DX] so RY 0 PI a PX) sc PX] ae
1570 1536 Ay 10 125 1033 AY, 1008 1078 1058 17 112 1181
Fr
zone cj
Fr
ee es
==> —
a Le
—_ — Fr 4 bel 3 es 3 re
Fr fmm as el s a
aS
Fr 3 .
rc
Fr 3 pe 3 Fr 3 po 3 =a zone a
SN
——_ zone F
ip ri=— ?=—— 2
—— Fri = =—_ —
7 Fr = " — — — — 2 =
roa J 2 | = «1 mu vet is ni Be ve fs a == a1 i fe
Fruitland Fu
DATUM
Pictured
Cliffs Ss
D 7039 TM 6913 TM 2211 6758 TD 6506 ‘7D 6528 1D 6573 TD 3499 TD 6549 TD 6632 ‘TD 6728
£. 2 8.
T. 3h ik, RB. 12 8. T. 30 N., R. 12 W. R. 12 W.
t
@ @ @) G@ ® ®& @® @ @ ®
PAN AMERICAN AZTEC 0 & G AZTEC OIL & CAS PAN AMERICAN TTENNECO OTL COMPANY _SUNRAY MID-CONTINENT REDPERN 6 HERD REDFERN & HERD PAN AMERICAN RIGGS OTL & GAS
#1-A, U.S.A. STANDOLIND " 43, THOMPSON #12 THOMPSON #5, L.C. KELLY #A-1, R.E. McKENZIE #N-2, NEW MEXICO-FEDERAL 1, OLLIE SULLIVAN #1, FEDERAL #1, JOHNSON #1, CARSON GAS CoN #1, FULCHER KUTZ
Sic SEQ NEK Sec.29 SEX Nid NE Sec.34 NE Sif SW Sec.33 SW NE SE Sec.3 Si NB NB Sec. 9 SW NB NB Sec.17 SUL NE NE Sec.22 NEA SWh NEW Sec.29 Nuk SE NE Sec.28 SW NE Sih Sec.32 SW NE SW: Sec. 4
6014" 6022" 5946" 5822" S815" +5769" 5537" 5541" 5452" 5406" 57246"
DX on PX} so PX} so PX] so PX so PX} 0 PX] 2» P| a PX.» PX} se PX 6
Fr 2
zone LA
“ a wa 1642 1451 NA 1364, Na 1297 1173 wa 980 869 wv, 795 694 Na 998
zone
Fr a
Z ‘zone
cone 3———
Fe fo 4
ia = a a a a
Fr 3 Fi ‘i -* i = a oe nr sl Se as ;
zone Pe ee i — 3
= ————
zone
Fr >
zone
Fr 3 fed 3
Ss
a
bE | ee
rah Ti
eg
Fe2 P| 2 2 Lo 2
— ees Fr 2 ———— = —_— —__
a ig se ee ;
——— — —| 6 ne!
Trea feet 5 SS PD 2S SS Sr i = 1 —_—— #4 2 i ee @ 15
Fruitland Fa
DATUM
Pictured
Cliffs Ss
‘TD 4990 ‘TD 4951 ‘TD 6958 ‘TD 6787 ‘TD 6825 ‘TD 6725 TD 6464 ‘TD 6411 ‘TD 6285 ‘TD 6134 ‘TD 6538

DATUM

DATUM

Meters Feet
0-0

24

}-100
504

200
4

[300
1004

L«oo

Vertical Scale

COAL RESOURCE OCCURRENCE MAP OF THE FLORA VISTA QUADRANGLE, SAN JUAN COUNTY, NEW MEXICO

BY
DAMES & MOORE
1979

&
A
®
£
&
=

2
&
2
s
3
3
8
8
8
=
3
p=!
3
E3
2
8
s
3
Fs
2
g

2
&

ujeuay passaidxa suoisnjouoo pue suo!
-pueis jeL011pa Aansng |eo160]089 yrM ArlW40;U0D

404 paupa uaaq jou sey pue Aanung [20/60/08
“$7 aU) 01 JOBUOD JepUN paredasd sem dew siy |.

AaAYNS 1V91901039
YOIYALNI FHL IO LNIWLYVd3d

g sO ¢ 3lvid

Ohl =62

SALVLS G3LINN

1Y¥Od34 31I3 N3dO
# U nit ed Sta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 08-1203 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

v . JONATHAN POLAND, Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA
T h e o p i n i o n o f t h i s C o u r t , i s s u e d o n A p r i l 2 , 2 0 0 9 , s h o uld be amended as follows: On page 7, line 1 of footnote 2, replace "a number changes" with "a number of changes". On page 7, line 2 of footnote 2, replace "fo" with "of".
#### SLAMCIK v STATE

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9742.

Decided Mar 18, 1929

John F Smolka, Cleveland, for Slamcik.

E J Hopple, Clevleand, for State.

VICKERY, PJ.

There are two grounds upon which it is claimed that this verdict is wrong and the judgment based thereon should be reversed. The first was that this young man had an alibi. An alibi is a good defense because if the party was not there he could not have committed the crime, but unfortunately in this case the alibi is so weak that it does not deserve to be called an .alibi. It is admitted that he, together with his friends, accosted this girl on the street. It is admitted that the friends went the other way, and the girl positively identified this young man. She had known him some time before and there is no question as to the identity and there was no alibi that was worthy of the name, introduced in the case.

The next proposition is hardly consistent With the alibi, because if he was not there he could not be charged with doing things for which he asserts the second ground of error, that is, that all the acts .that were complained of in this case fell short of an •attempt to commit a rape. It seems to be the argument of counsel that unless the force was sufficient to overcome the resistance of the girl, there would not be any attempt to commit a rape, even though he intended to. In other words, the rape must be actually committed, because if her resistance was overcome and he was successful in his attempt, then it would cease to. become an attempt. But the reason why this ended in an attempt only was that the screams of this girl were such as to attract the attention of the neighbors and within a few minutes not only were the neighbors gathered around the scene, but the father who lived a few doors away was called and he was there. The girl’s clothes were disordered and disarranged and she was thrown upon the ground and he sought apparently by all means within his power to accomplish his purpose, and was only frustrated by the screams of this girl and her resistance.

We think there is ample evidence in the record to sustain the verdict and that the defense of alibi was not proven and the identification by the girl was complete, and there can be no doubt from the circumstances surrounding this case but that the young man did assault this girl with an intent to commit r,ape.

The jury having found it so under a proper charge, we do not feel called upon to disturb the verdict. The judgment will, therefore, be affirmed.

Sullivan and Levine, JJ, concur.
#### § 1400.735-20 Code of Professional Conduct for FMCS Mediators.

The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service has a Code of Professional Conduct for FMCS Mediators. Mediators in the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service are required to conduct themselves in accordance with the responsibilities outlined therein.

[88 FR 4728, Jan. 25, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATION FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          35,682
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,466
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (479)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,583
<PP&E>                                          21,473
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,619)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,778
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,178
<BONDS>                                          7,552
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            64
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,114
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,778
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,810
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (446)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,857)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (603)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,254)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (905)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)


</TABLE>
#### Rowley *vs.*Chautauque County Bank. Brigham *vs.*Same.

ALBANY,

Sept. 1837.

A writ of *summons*against a corporation, must contain *cause of action,*stated as fully as a cause of action is ordinarily stated in a declaration.

S. Stevens, for the defendants,

moved to quash the writ of *summons*issued and served in each of these suits, on the ground that the process was not in the proper form. By the writ the sheriff was commanded to summon the defendants to answer the plaintiff, “of a plea of trespass on the case upon promises,' to his damage of one hundred and ten dollars.” There was no further statement of the cause of action.

*A. Taber,*for the plaintiffs.

*By the Court,*

Bronson, J.

The plaintiffs were right in proceeding by summons, though it would have been otherwise had the action been brought against an *individual. Lynch*v. *Mechanics Bank,*13 Johns. R. 127. 2 R. S. 347, § 1. Ib. 458, § 4. But there has been an entire departure from established precedents in setting forth the cause of action. In *assumpsit*and other actions on the case, the original writ sets forth the cause of action in the same ample form as it is stated in the declaration. No precedent has been mentioned, nor do I find any, which warrants the general statement contained in these writs. The plaintiffs’ counsel has referred to the proceedings against persons having privilege of parliament. Formerly they could only be sued by original writs, but now, by statute, they may be proceeded against by bill and summons. The summons in such cases is a judicial, not an original writ. 2 Archb. Pr. 95. But actions against corporations can only be commenced by original, and in framing the writ, the court is not at liberty to sanction a departure from established forms. 2 R. S. 277, § 8. In the case of Rowley, the motion to quash the writ must be granted. In the case of Brigham, although *27the return day is past, the plaintiffs’ attorney swears that the writ has not been returned, but is in his office in Chautauque. The proper course will be to *supersede*the writ. *Ferguson*v. *Jones,*12 Wendell, 241.

Ordered accordingly.*

*

*Vide Hayward*v. *Hoyt,*9 Wendell, 483.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 USC SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



                         CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT

I, Yaron Meerfeld, Chief Executive Officer of InkSure Technologies Inc. (the
"Company"), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1. The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 28, 2003




                                     /s/ Yaron Meerfeld
                                     ---------------------------------------
                                     Yaron Meerfeld, Chief Executive Officer


                         CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT

I, Eyal Bigon, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of InkSure
Technologies Inc. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1. The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 28, 2003


                                     /s/ Eyal Bigon
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Eyal Bigon, Chief Financial Officer,
                                     Secretary and Treasurer





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 450.143 Safety-critical system design, test, and documentation. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to all safety-critical systems, except for— ( 1 ) Highly reliable flight safety systems covered under § 450.145; or
( 2 ) Safety-critical systems for which an operator demonstrates through its flight hazard analysis that the likelihood of any hazardous condition specifically associated with the system that may cause death or serious injury to the public is extremely remote, pursuant to § 450.109(b)(3).
( b ) *Design.* An operator must design safety-critical systems such that no credible fault can lead to increased risk to the public beyond nominal safety-critical system operation.
( c ) *Qualification testing of design.* An operator must functionally demonstrate the design of the vehicle's safety-critical systems at conditions beyond its predicted operating environments. The operator must select environmental test levels that ensure the design is sufficiently stressed to demonstrate that system performance is not degraded due to design tolerances, manufacturing variances, or uncertainties in the environment.
( d ) *Acceptance of hardware.* An operator must— ( 1 ) Functionally demonstrate any safety-critical system, while exposed to its predicted operating environments with margin, is free of defects, free of integration and workmanship errors, and ready for operational use; or
( 2 ) Combine in-process controls and a quality assurance process to ensure functional capability of any safety-critical system during its service life.
( e ) *Lifecycle of safety-critical systems.* ( 1 ) The predicted operating environments must be based on conditions predicted to be encountered in all phases of flight, recovery, and transportation.
( 2 ) An operator must monitor the flight environments experienced by safety-critical system components to the extent necessary to— ( i ) Validate the predicted operating environments; and
( ii ) Assess the actual component life remaining or adjust any inspection period.
( f ) *Application requirements.* An applicant must submit to the FAA the following as part of its application: ( 1 ) A list and description of each safety-critical system;
( 2 ) Drawings and schematics for each safety-critical system;
( 3 ) A summary of the analysis to determine the predicted operating environments and duration to be applied to qualification and acceptance testing covering the service life of any safety-critical system;
( 4 ) A description of any method used to validate the predicted operating environments;
( 5 ) A description of any instrumentation or inspection processes to monitor aging of any safety-critical system;
( 6 ) The criteria and procedures for disposal or refurbishment for service life extension of safety-critical system components; and
( 7 ) A description of the standards used in all phases of the lifecycle of each safety-critical system.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Frank Giallella, Appellant.

Argued December 4, 1936;

decided December 31, 1936.

*Cyril J. Kavanagh*and *Robert E. Miller*for appellant.

*Walter C.*Newcomb, *District Attorney (David F. Doyle*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: O’Brien, Htjbbs, Crouch and Finch, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman and Loughran, JJ.
#### Hirsch Cahn et al., Appellants, *v.*The National City Bank of New York, Respondent.

(Argued November 23, 1936;

decided December 4, 1936.)

*Borris M. Komar*for appellants.

*MacIlburne Voorhies*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
#### §§ 91.807-91.813 [Reserved]
§ 91.153 VFR flight plan: Information required. ( a ) *Information required.* Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, each person filing a VFR flight plan shall include in it the following information: ( 1 ) The aircraft identification number and, if necessary, its radio call sign.
( 2 ) The type of the aircraft or, in the case of a formation flight, the type of each aircraft and the number of aircraft in the formation.
( 3 ) The full name and address of the pilot in command or, in the case of a formation flight, the formation commander.
( 4 ) The point and proposed time of departure.
( 5 ) The proposed route, cruising altitude (or flight level), and true airspeed at that altitude.
( 6 ) The point of first intended landing and the estimated elapsed time until over that point.
( 7 ) The amount of fuel on board (in hours).
( 8 ) The number of persons in the aircraft, except where that information is otherwise readily available to the FAA.
( 9 ) Any other information the pilot in command or ATC believes is necessary for ATC purposes.
( b ) *Cancellation.* When a flight plan has been activated, the pilot in command, upon canceling or completing the flight under the flight plan, shall notify an FAA Flight Service Station or ATC facility.
# Attachment B
July 2, 2004, Leila H. Cook Memo: Clean

Fuel Fleet Program July 21, 2005, Memo to Manufacturers: Clean Fuel Vehicle Standards April 17, 2006, Leila H. Cook Memo to Air Directors: Clean Fuel Fleet Program

Requirements
#### § 89.301 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes the minimum message element set and minimum performance requirements for standard remote identification unmanned aircraft and remote identification broadcast modules.
§ 101.13 Compliance with Board decision and order. ( a ) Shortly after the Board's decision and order is issued the Director of the Regional Office in which the charge was filed communicates with the respondent for the purpose of obtaining compliance. Conferences may be held to arrange the details necessary for compliance with the terms of the order.
( b ) If the respondent effects full compliance with the terms of the order, the Regional Director submits a report to that effect to Washington, DC, after which the case may be closed. Despite compliance, however, the Board's order is a continuing one; therefore, the closing of a case on compliance is necessarily conditioned upon the continued observance of that order; and in some cases it is deemed desirable, notwithstanding compliance, to implement the order with an enforcing court judgment. Subsequent violations of the order may become the basis of further proceedings.
6th Amendment of Taylor Capital Profit Sharing and Employee Stock Ownership Plan



 
EXHIBIT 10.71

 
SIXTH AMENDMENT 
OF 
TAYLOR CAPITAL GROUP, INC. 
PROFIT SHARING AND EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN 
 
(Effective as of October 1, 1998) 
 
WHEREAS, Taylor Capital Group, Inc. (the “Company”)
maintains the Taylor Capital Group, Inc. Profit Sharing and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Effective as of October 1, 1998) (the “Plan”); and 
 
WHEREAS, amendment of the Plan is now considered desirable; 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of the power reserved to the Company by subsection 17.1 of the Plan, and in
exercise of the authority delegated to the Committee established pursuant to Section 18 of the plan (the “Committee”) by subsection 17.1 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
 
1. By adding the following at the end of
subsection 6.2 of the Plan, effective June 30, 2003: 
 
“For purposes of the Plan, the term ‘ESOP portion’ shall be participants’ ESOP stock accounts and ESOP cash accounts.” 
 
2. By substituting the following for the subsection 6.3 of the Plan, effective June 30, 2003:

 
“6.3 Accounting Dates; Accounting Period

 
“All accounts shall be adjusted as of
each March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31 (each such date referred to as a ‘regular accounting date’). A ‘special accounting date’ is any date designated as such by the Committee and a special accounting date
occurring under subsection 17.3. The term ‘accounting date’ includes a regular accounting date and a special accounting date. Any references to an ‘accounting period’ shall mean the period since the next preceding accounting
date.” 
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
duly authorized member of the Committee has caused the foregoing amendment to be executed this 19th day of March,
2003. 
 

	
	 /s/    MELVIN E.
PEARL        


	 On behalf of the Committee as Aforesaid
#### Den *against*Vancleve.

RETAXATION OF COSTS. FEES OF WITNESSES.

Court.

A party is entitled to the fees, for the time his witnesses necessarily attended ; but if the time is disputed, he must shew how long they did attend. The entry on the minutes of the court, that they were sworn, is *prima facie*evidence of their attendance on the day the cause was noticed for trial, and of their continuing until it closed. It may, however, be shewn, if the fact be so, that they were sooner dismissed, or went away by consent of parties. In this case the evidence closed on *Friday*night, and the witnesses were then discharged. The defendant is, therefore, entitled to tax the fees of all his witnesses, until that time ; that is, for five days each.
dwsbex3202.htm


    EXHIBIT
32.02

    


    


    CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

    18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

    AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

    SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    


    


    


    


    In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Spectrum
Global Balanced L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of
Demeter Management LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     

    
      	
              (1)  

            	
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

            


    

     

    
      	
              (2)  

            	
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.

            


    

     

    


     

    


     

    


     

    


    


    


    
      	 
      	
              By:

            	
              /s/
      Christian Angstadt

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Name:

            	
              Christian
      Angstadt

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Title:

            	
              Chief
      Financial Officer of

            	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
              Demeter
      Management LLC,

            	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
              general
      partner of the registrant

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Date:

            	
              November
      13, 2009