alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Correction to Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice corrects the closing date for the public comment period published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on April 14, 2000 (65 FR 20197), for the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Navajo Ten-Year Forest Management Plan, Navajo Nation, Arizona/New Mexico. The closing date is changed from June 15, 2000 to May 15, 2000. All other information published in the April 14, 2000 notice remains unchanged.                     

# DATES:

The correct date by which written comments must arrive is May 15, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Harold D. Russell, 520-729-7228. 

Dated: May 8, 2000. 

Kevin Gover, 

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 00-12087 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of Gateway Distributors, Ltd., a
Nevada  corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB/A No. 2 for the period ended
December  31,  2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Bailey, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 1, 2006.

                                        /s/ Richard A. Bailey
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Richard A. Bailey, Chief Executive
                                        Officer
#### § 71.5 Reporting points.

The reporting points listed in subpart H of FAA Order JO 7400.11J (incorporated by reference, see § 71.1) consist of geographic locations at which the position of an aircraft must be reported in accordance with part 91 of this chapter.

[Doc. No. 29334, 73 FR 54495, Sept. 22, 2008, as amended by Amdt. 71-40, 73 FR 60940, Oct. 15, 2008; Amdt. 71-41, 74 FR 46490, Sept. 10, 2009; Amdt. 71-42, 75 FR 55268, Sept. 10, 2010; Amdt. 71-43, 76 FR 53329, Aug. 26, 2011; Amdt. 71-44, 77 FR 50908, Aug. 23, 2012; Amdt. 71-45, 78 FR 52848, Aug. 27, 2013; Amdt. 71-46, 79 FR 51888, Sept. 2, 2014; Amdt. 71-47, 80 FR 51937, Aug. 27, 2015; Amdt. 71-48, 81 FR 55372, Aug. 19, 2016; Amdt. 71-49, 82 FR 40068, Aug. 24, 2017; Amdt. 71-50, 83 FR 43757, Aug. 28, 2018; Amdt. 71-51, 84 FR 45652, Aug. 30, 2019; Amdt. 71-52, 85 FR 50780, Aug. 18, 2020; Amdt. No. 71-53, 86 FR 46963, Aug. 23, 2021; Docket No. FAA-2022-1022, Amdt. No. 71-54, 87 FR 54878, Sept. 8, 2022; Docket No. FAA-2023-1785; Amendment No. 71-55, 88 FR 58072, Aug. 25, 2023; Docket No. FAA-2024-2061; Amendment No. 71-56, 89 FR 68339, Aug. 26, 2024]

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

By Docket No. FAA-2024-2061; Amendment No. 71-56, 89 FR 68339, Aug. 26, 2024, § 71.5 was amended by removing the words “FAA Order JO 7400.11H” and adding, in their place, the words “FAA Order JO 7400.11J, effective Sept. 15, 2024 through Sept. 15, 2025.
§ 1430.2 Definitions. For the purposes of this part: ( a ) The term *Act* means the Federal Advisory Committee Act;
( b ) The term *advisory committee* means any committee, board, commission, counsel, conference, panel, task force, or other similar group, or any subgroup or subcommittee thereof which is: ( 1 ) Established by statute or reorganization, plan, or
( 2 ) Established or utilized by the President, or
( 3 ) Established or utilized by one or more agencies or officers of the Federal Government in the interest of obtaining advice or recommendations for the President or one or more agencies of the Federal Government, except that such term excludes: ( i ) The Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations;
( ii ) The Commission on Government Procurement; and
( iii ) Any committee which is composed wholly of full-time officers or employees of the Federal Government.
( c ) The term *agency* has the same meaning as in 5 U.S.C. 552(1);
( d ) The term *committee management officer* means the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service employee or his delegee, officially designated to perform the advisory committee management functions delineated in this part;
( e ) The term *Service* means the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service;
( f ) The term *OMB* means the Office of Management and Budget;
( g ) The term *Director* means the Director of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service;
( h ) The term *secretariat* means the OMB Committee Management Secretariat.
#### § 100.551 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the agency shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with handicaps. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 101-19.607, apply to buildings covered by this section.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification of CEO Pursuant to**

**Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Dwain Brannon, the Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary of LiquidGolf Holding Corporation, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of LiquidGolf HoldingCorporation (“LiquidGolf”); 

 

2. Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of LiquidGolf as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. LiquidGolf’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for LiquidGolf and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to LiquidGolf is made known to us, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)[Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986 Section III. E.]; 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of LiquidGolf’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in LiquidGolf’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, ourinternal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.LiquidGolf’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to our auditors and the audit committee of our Board of Directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 26, 2004
§ 0.737-7 Hearing rights. ( a ) The following rights shall be afforded at a hearing conducted before the Examiner: ( 1 ) To represent oneself or to be represented by counsel,
( 2 ) To introduce and examine witnesses and to submit physical evidence,
( 3 ) To confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses,
( 4 ) To present oral argument; and
( 5 ) To obtain a transcript or recording of proceedings, on request.
( b ) In a hearing under this subpart, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Evidence do not apply. However, the Examiner may make orders and determinations regarding discovery, admissability of evidence, conduct of examination and cross-examination, and similar matters as the Examiner deems necessary or appropriate to ensure orderliness of the proceedings and fundamental fairness to the parties.
( c ) In any proceeding under this subpart, the Department must establish any violation by a preponderance of the evidence.
Editorial Note on Part 47
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 47 appear at 75 FR 41979, July 20, 2010.

§ 47.9 Corporations not U.S. citizens. ( a ) Each corporation applying for registration of an aircraft under 49 U.S.C. 44102 must submit to the Registry with the Aircraft Registration Application, AC Form 8050-1— ( 1 ) A certified copy of its certificate of incorporation;
( 2 ) A certification that it is lawfully qualified to do business in one or more States;
( 3 ) A certification that the aircraft will be based and primarily used in the United States; and
( 4 ) The location where the records required by paragraph (e) of this section will be maintained.
( b ) For the purposes of registration, an aircraft is based and primarily used in the United States if the flight hours accumulated within the United States amount to at least 60 percent of the total flight hours of the aircraft during the period consisting in the remainder of the registration month and the succeeding 6 calendar months and each 6 calendar month period thereafter.
( c ) For the purpose of this section, only those flight hours accumulated during non-stop (except for stops in emergencies or for purposes of refueling) flight between two points in the United States, even if the aircraft is outside of the United States during part of the flight, are considered flight hours accumulated within the United States.
( d ) In determining compliance with this section, any periods during which the aircraft is not validly registered in the United States are disregarded.
( e ) The corporation that registers an aircraft pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 44102 shall maintain, and make available for inspection by the FAA upon request, records containing the total flight hours in the United States of the aircraft for three calendar years after the year in which the flight hours were accumulated.
( f ) The corporation that registers an aircraft pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 44102 shall send to the Registry, at the end of each period of time described in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section, either— ( 1 ) A signed report containing— ( i ) The total time in service of the airframe as provided in § 91.417(a)(2)(i), accumulated during that period; and
( ii ) The total flight hours in the United States of the aircraft accumulated during that period; or
( 2 ) A signed statement that the total flight hours of the aircraft, while registered in the United States during that period, have been exclusively within the United States.
[Amdt. 47-20, 44 FR 61940, Oct. 29, 1979, as amended by Amdt. 47-24, 54 FR 34330, Aug. 18, 1989; Amdt. 47-27, 70 FR 245, Jan. 3, 2005; Amdt. 47-29, 75 FR 41979, July 20, 2010; Amdt. No. 47-34, 87 FR 75711, Dec. 9, 2022; 88 FR 2813, Jan. 18, 2023]
September 18, 2015

Mr. Ross Anderson

927 Gay Street

Longmont, CO 80501

Dear Mr. Anderson :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

, § § 91

. 9

, 91.103(b)(2)

, 91.105

, 91.109

, 91.119

, 91.121

, 91.151

, 91.405

, 91.407

, 91.409

, 9 1.417 and p art 21, Subpart H of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains

why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your exemption request filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2471 on June 26, 2015

, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must

send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This web site helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested inf ormation

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

CESAR COUTINO-LOPEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

No. 16-50178 

D.C. No. 3:15-cr-02657-LAB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2017**

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

Cesar Coutino-Lopez appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 24-month sentence and one-year term of supervised release imposed 

following his guilty-plea conviction for being a removed alien found in the United 

States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 24 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 16-50178 

§ 1291, and we affirm.

Coutino-Lopez contends that the government breached the parties’ plea 

agreement at the sentencing hearing by implicitly suggesting that it did not support 

the stipulated low-end Guidelines sentence or the four-level fast-track departure 

under U.S.S.G. § 5K3.1. We reject this argument because the record reflects that, 

in its sentencing summary chart and at the sentencing hearing, the government 

stood by its recommendation that Coutino-Lopez receive the stipulated fast-track 

departure and a low-end Guidelines sentence. Accordingly, Coutino-Lopez 

received the benefit of his bargain and “the presentation of a united front to the 

court.” See United States v. Alcala-Sanchez, 666 F.3d 571, 575 (9th Cir. 2012) 

(internal quotations omitted).

Coutino-Lopez next contends that his sentence is substantively 

unreasonable. The court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Coutino-Lopez’s 

sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The custodial 

sentence and term of supervised release are substantively reasonable in light of the 

applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and the totality of the circumstances, 

including Coutino-Lopez’s immigration history. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51. 

AFFIRMED.
§ 420.25 Launch site location review—risk analysis. ( a ) If a flight corridor or impact dispersion area defined by § 420.23 contains a populated area, the applicant shall estimate the casualty expectation associated with the flight corridor or impact dispersion area. An applicant shall use the methodology provided in appendix C to this part for guided orbital or suborbital expendable launch vehicles and appendix D for unguided suborbital launch vehicles.
( b ) For licensed launches, the FAA will not approve the location of the proposed launch point if the estimated expected casualty exceeds 1 × 10−4.
[Doc. No. FAA-1999-5833, 65 FR 62861, Oct. 19, 2000, as amended by Amdt. 420-3, 72 FR 17019, Apr. 6, 2007; Docket No. FAA-2014-0418, Amdt. No. 420-7, 81 FR 47027, July 20, 2016; Doc. No. FAA-2016-6761, Amdt. No. 420-8, 83 FR 28535, June 20, 2018]
Exhibit
21.1





COLUMBUS
McKINNON CORPORATION





SUBSIDIARIES


(as
of March 31, 2008)








CM
Insurance Company, Inc. (US-NY)


Columbus
McKinnon de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)


Columbus
McKinnon de Uruguay, S.A. (Uruguay)


Columbus
McKinnon do Brazil Ltda. (Brazil)


Columbus
McKinnon de Panama S.A. (Panama)


Crane
Equipment & Service, Inc. (US-OK)


Société
d’Exploitation des Raccords Gautier (France)


Univeyor
A/S (Denmark)


Univeyor
Conveying Systems Ltd. (England)


Yale
Industrial Products, Inc. (US-DE)


Egyptian-American
Crane Co. (40% Joint Venture) (Egypt)


Audubon
Europe S.a.r.l. (Luxembourg)


Columbus
McKinnon Limited (Canada)


Yale
Industrial Products Ltd. (England)


Yale
Industrial Products GmbH (Germany)


Asia
Hoist Co., Ltd. (Hong Kong)


Hangzhou
LILA Lifting and Lashing Co. Ltd. (China)


Yale
Hangzhou Industrial Products Co. Ltd. (China)


Columbus
McKinnon Corporation Ltd. (England)


Yale
      Levage (France)


Columbus
      McKinnon Italia S.r.l. (Italy)


Yale
      Elevación Ibérica S.L. (Spain)


Yale
      Industrial Products Asia (Thailand) Co.
Ltd.


Yale
      Industrial Products B.V. (The
Netherlands)


Yale
      Industrial Products GmbH (Austria)


Yale
      Industrial Products Pty. Ltd. (South
Africa)


Yale
      Lifting & Mining Products (Pty.) Ltd. (25% Financial Interest) (South
      Africa)


Yale
      Industrial Products Kft. (Hungary)
EXHIBIT 10.9

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned, being the Active
Chairman of the Board of Marnetics
Broadband Technologies Ltd. Ltd., an Israeli corporation (the Company), do
hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, information and belief, that:

| | (1) | The Annual
  Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the Form 20-F) of
  the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The
  information contained in the Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents, in
  all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
  the Company.                                   

|Dated: June
  29 , 2003 |                               
|----------------------- | ------------------------------
|                        |                               
|                        | By: /s/
  Menachem Reinschmidt
|                        |                               
|                        | Menachem Reinschmidt          
|                        | Chairman of
  the Board       

---

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

DENNIS LEE WEAVER, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 

PERRY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 99 MM 2016 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2016, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and the Motion 

for Appointment of Counsel are DENIED.
## RADIO FREQUENCY SPECTRUM

TRANSMITTER Operating FrequenCy:5.728 GHz-5.85 GHZ Communication Distance (open area) : CE: 300m; FCC: 500m ReceiverSensitivfry (1°'ePER) :-93dBmotdaUtn Transmitter Povier:CE: 25mw; FCC: 125mw Working Voftage:80 mAC 6V BatteryA AA Batteries
§ 36.1501 Procedures, noise levels and other information. ( a ) All procedures, weights, configurations, and other information or data employed for obtaining the certified noise levels prescribed by this part, including equivalent procedures used for flight, testing, and analysis, must be developed and approved. Noise levels achieved during type certification must be included in the approved airplane (rotorcraft) flight manual.
( b ) Where supplemental test data are approved for modification or extension of an existing flight data base, such as acoustic data from engine static tests used in the certification of acoustical changes, the test procedures, physical configuration, and other information and procedures that are employed for obtaining the supplemental data must be developed and approved.
[Amdt. 36-15, 53 FR 16366, May 6, 1988]