alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
24/7 Real Media, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-118747, 333-112729, 333-111991, 333-109925,
333-108422, 333-106252, 333-100583, 333-89985, 333-47074, and 333-34020) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-122041,
333-100582, 333-87714, 333-83287, 333-66995, 333-56308, and 333-35306) on Form S-8 of 24/7 Real
Media, Inc. of our report dated March 1, 2005, related to the consolidated balance sheets of 24/7 Real Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004,
which report appears in the December 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K of 24/7 Real Media, Inc.



New
York, NY
March 16, 2005

---



QuickLinks
Editorial Note on Part 399
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 399 appear at 84 FR 15947, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 399.60 Standards for determining priorities of hearing. ( a ) *General.* This policy statement describes the general standards which will be used by the Department in determining the order in which it will designate for hearing those matters on its docket which are to be decided after notice and hearing. Among such matters are applications for certificates of public convenience and necessity or for foreign air carrier permits; complaint cases; and various rate-making proceedings.
( b ) *Standards.* Matters will be assigned for hearing in accordance with the degree of relative priority which each matter is entitled to on the basis of the comparative public interest involved therein. Among other things, the Department will take into account: ( 1 ) Statutory requirements for preference or statutory limitations on the time within which the Department shall act;
( 2 ) The impact of delay on the public or particular persons;
( 3 ) The need for promptly securing compliance with the provisions of the Act;
( 4 ) The time for which the matter has already been pending and which would be required to dispose of it;
( 5 ) Whether the application requests renewal of an existing temporary authorization; and
( 6 ) In matters relating to operating authority: ( i ) Whether a proposal might reduce subsidy or increase economy of operations;
( ii ) Whether an application proposes new service;
( iii ) The volume of traffic that might be affected by the grant or denial of the proposal;
( iv ) The period that has elapsed since the Department considered the service needs of the places or areas involved; and
( v ) The relative availability of necessary staff members of the carriers, communities and the Department, in the light of other proceedings already in progress, to handle the processing of the case.
Interested persons may urge upon the Department such considerations as they believe should lead it to accord a particular application a priority different from that which the Department has given it. [PS-21, 29 FR 1446, Jan. 29, 1964, as amended by Doc. No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15947, Apr. 16, 2019]
# Table 4_Chemical Parameter

# image1.jpeg
§ 25.856 Thermal/Acoustic insulation materials. ( a ) Thermal/acoustic insulation material installed in the fuselage must meet the flame propagation test requirements of part VI of Appendix F to this part, or other approved equivalent test requirements. This requirement does not apply to “small parts,” as defined in part I of Appendix F of this part.
( b ) For airplanes with a passenger capacity of 20 or greater, thermal/acoustic insulation materials (including the means of fastening the materials to the fuselage) installed in the lower half of the airplane fuselage must meet the flame penetration resistance test requirements of part VII of Appendix F to this part, or other approved equivalent test requirements. This requirement does not apply to thermal/acoustic insulation installations that the FAA finds would not contribute to fire penetration resistance.
[Amdt. 25-111, 68 FR 45059, July 31, 2003]
§ 5.5 General requirements. ( a ) *SMS components.* An SMS under this part must be appropriate to the size, scope, and complexity of the person's organization and include, at a minimum, all of the following components: ( 1 ) Safety policy that meets the requirements of subpart B of this part.
( 2 ) Safety risk management that meets the requirements of subpart C of this part.
( 3 ) Safety assurance that meets the requirements of subpart D of this part.
( 4 ) Safety promotion that meets the requirements of subpart E of this part.
( b ) *Continuing requirements.* Any person required to develop and implement an SMS under this part must maintain the SMS in accordance with this part.
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to October 6, 2020)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

None Available

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Charles Ham and Frederick Fowler, Appellants.

(Argued October 19, 1936;

decided December 1, 1936.)

*Sidney M. Gottesman, David F. Price*and *Benjamin Schifter*for Charles Ham, appellant.

*Edward J. Reilly, Ella Bernard*and *Louis Drago*for Frederick Fowler, appellant.

*William F. X. Geoghan, District Attorney (Edward H. Levine*and *Henry J. Walsh*of counsel), for respondent.

As to each defendant, judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
#### SHIPMAN et al. v. MEDLOCK.

No. 32283.

Sept. 16, 1947.

*184 P. 2d 764.*

*129Herbert K. Hyde and Breck Moss, both of Oklahoma City, for plaintiffs in error.

Deupree & Linn, of Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

GIBSON, J.

Defendant in error, Alice C. Medlock, owner of lots in block 13, Oak Park addition to Oklahoma City, instituted this action to declare void two deeds covering other lots in said block. One was executed by plaintiffs in error J. D. Shipman and Ella Shipman to plaintiff in error Bertha Jones, and the other by plaintiffs in error W. B. Eaton and Maud Eaton to plaintiffs in error Taylor Jackson and Bernice L. Jackson. The alleged basis for the relief sought is that the grantees in said deeds are persons of the negro or African race and by reason thereof the deeds violate the restrictive provisions of a contract to which the grantors and others, owners of all lots in said block, were signatory. Plaintiff was awarded judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted.

The validity of the contract is not called in question and the sole question in issue was whether changes in conditions since the making of such contract have rendered the restrictive provisions thereof impractical and their enforcement inequitable.

Block 13 lies between Eighth street on the south and Ninth street on the north, and between Lottie avenue on the west and Kate avenue on the east. At the time of entering into the contract no lots in block 13 or the adjoining blocks were owned by negroes. At the present time negro ownership has progressed northward from the south by-reason of which block 17, diagonally across intersection of Eighth street and Lottie avenue from block 13 is fully owned by negroes, and blocks 16 and 15, across Ninth street and south and southeast, respectively, of block 13, are in substantial part owned by negroes. In block 12, directly across Lottie avenue to the west of block 13 there is slight infiltration. In the blocks north and east of block 13 there has been no infiltration.

The trial court considered in detail the situations and found that there had been no such changes in conditions in relation to the occupancy of property as would warrant escape from the obligatory provisions of the contract by the parties thereto, and such holding is not clearly against the weight of the evidence.

The question presented is in substance the same as that presented and considered by this court in the recent case of Schwartz et al. v. Hubbard, 198 Okla. 194, 177 P. 2d 117, and the law there announced is applicable and controlling here.

Judgment affirmed.

HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and WELCH, CORN, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 : PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Tanya McCaffery, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A-1 of Specialty Trust, Inc.2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. /s/ Tanya M. McCaffery
    
    Dated this
3rd day
of May 2005Name:
    
    Tanya M. McCafferyTitle :
    
    Interim Chief Financial Officer
 99
§ 60.9 Additional responsibilities of the sponsor. ( a ) The sponsor must allow the responsible Flight Standards office upon request to inspect the FSTD as soon as practicable. This inspection may include all records and documents relating to the FSTD, to determine its compliance with this part.
( b ) The sponsor must do the following for each FSTD: ( 1 ) Establish a mechanism to receive written comments regarding the FSTD and its operation in accordance with the QPS appendix E of this part.
( 2 ) Post in or adjacent to the FSTD the Statement of Qualification issued by the responsible Flight Standards office. An electronic copy of the Statement of Qualification that may be accessed by an appropriate terminal or display in or adjacent to the FSTD is satisfactory.
( c ) Each sponsor of an FSTD must identify to the responsible Flight Standards office by name, one individual to be the management representative (MR). ( 1 ) One person may serve as an MR for more than one FSTD, but one FSTD must not have more than one person serving in this capacity.
( 2 ) Each MR must be an employee of the sponsor with the responsibility and authority to— ( i ) Monitor the on-going qualification of assigned FSTDs to ensure that all matters regarding FSTD qualification are being carried out as provided for in this part;
( ii ) Ensure that the QMS is properly established, implemented, and maintained by overseeing the structure (and modifying where necessary) of the QMS policies, practices, and procedures; and
( iii ) Regularly brief sponsor's management on the status of the on-going FSTD qualification program and the effectiveness and efficiency of the QMS.
( 3 ) The MR serves as the primary contact point for all matters between the sponsor and the responsible Flight Standards office regarding the qualification of that FSTD as provided for in this part.
( 4 ) The MR may delegate the duties described in paragraph (c)(2) and (c)(3) of this section to an individual at each of the sponsor's locations.
[Docket No. FAA-2002-12461, 71 FR 63426, Oct. 30, 2006, as amended by Docket No. FAA-2022-1355, Amdt. No. 60-7, 87 FR 75711, Dec. 9, 2022]
#### Francis Zyderveld, Appellant, *v.*Realty Supply Corporation, Respondent.

(Argued May 26, 1936;

decided July 8, 1936.)

*424
      *Bernhardt M. Meisels*and *James M. Fawcett*for appellant.

*Sidney A. Clarkson*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Grane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
#### Strouse & Brothers, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. T. C. Hall, *Defendant in Error.*

Where a writ of error purports to be taken to a final judgment and no such final judgment- as will support a writ of error appears in the transcript, the court should not proceed to consider the errors assigned but should dismiss the writ of error whether a motion be made for that purpose or not, since, except in case of an order granting a new trial under the statute, a writ of error may properly issue only to a judgment making a final disposition of the action in the trial court.

This case was decided by Division A.

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Marion County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of.the court.

*J. W. Frasier*and *Wm. Hunter,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*H. M. Hampton,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

— It appears from the transcript that during the trial of the cause the plaintiff announced that on account of a ruling of the court, refusing to admit certain proffered documentary evidence, it would be compelled to take a non-suit. We find nothing in the transcript which even purports to be a final judgment, therefore there is nothing to support a writ of error. See Goldring v. Reid, 60 Fla. 78, 53 South. Rep. 503, where prior decisions of this court will be found cited.

There being no- final judgment, it necessarily follows that the writ of error must be dismissed.

*395Whitfield, C. J., and Shackleford and Cockrell, J. J., concur;

Taylor, Hocker and Parkhill, J. J., concur in the opinion.
#### § 1401.30 Other rights and services.

Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to entitle any person, as of right, to any service or to the disclosure of any record to which such person is not entitled under the FOIA.
Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Importance: 

Kevin, 

Hartz, Jeffrey [Jeffrey.Hartz@aa.com] 

Thursday, July 15, 2010 3:29 PM 

Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Emrich, Robert; Foss, Gary 

Request for Extension for Joplin 

High 

'-. '--'-' -;-'f'.' I . I, •• \,1",../,/ 

It was good to talk with you. As we discussed on the phone, we would like to request an extension to file a proposal for 

Essential Air Service at Joplin, MO until Friday July 23, 2010. We need this extra time in order to do some additional 

analysis of the market in order for us to potentially put forward a bid. 

I appreciate your consideration of this extension. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns 

that you may have 

Jeffrey Hartz 

Manager - Strategic Planning 

American Eagle Airlines 

817-967-3698 

817-931-9325 

NOTICE:: This (:,mali and ;;~ny aHdchmenls -:11'6 for H18 exc!usbJ0 dnd GOnftdsi'dia! use of the inh::nded fecipifJnt(Sl. if yeu are not an intended rccipionL pk~dse do not 

fc,,,d. cil,·,t(bute, or taLe actien In re'iance upon thi:, rnclc,;nqe. If you l1ave fCGeive<i ttlis in C,lor pICE;S" nCJUfy mG imrr;c6ia.tely by ie-turn Crll ill I and promptly delete 

this mcss,]!J(; and Its aTtachments from yOU! ctJrnpurcr ':>j:;:;rem, 

1
# EUR-Lex - 31995D0399 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995D0399

**95/399/EC: Council Decision of 18 September 1995 on the accession of the Community to the Agreement for the establishment of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission **

*
Official Journal L 236 , 05/10/1995 P. 0024 - 0024 *

COUNCIL DECISION of 18 September 1995 on the accession of the Community to the Agreement for the establishment of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (95/399/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 43 in conjunction with Article 228 (2), first sentence and (3), first subparagraph, thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas the Community signed the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea which requires all members of the international community to cooperate in conserving and managing the sea's biological resources;

Whereas, in the case of sea fishing, the Community has responsibility for adopting measures to conserve and manage fishery resources and to enter into contractual arrangements in this regard with third countries and international organizations;

Whereas the Community participated to this end in the international negotiations which culminated in the approval of an Agreement by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations to set up the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission;

Whereas this Agreement constitutes a useful framework for strengthening international cooperation for the purpose of conserving and making rational use of Indian Ocean tuna and related species;

Whereas Community fishermen are engaged in fishing for these species in the Indian Ocean; whereas it is in the Community's interest to accede to the said Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement for the establishment of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Community, deposit the instrument of acceptance in accordance with Article XVII (1) of the Agreement.

Done at Brussels, 18 September 1995.

For the Council

The President

P. SOLBES MIRA

(1) OJ No C 109, 1. 5. 1995, p. 277.
#### § 91.707 Flights between Mexico or Canada and the United States.

Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, no person may operate a civil aircraft between Mexico or Canada and the United States without filing an IFR or VFR flight plan, as appropriate.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormac k
David F. Viviano
Richard H. Bernstein
Kurtis T. Wilder Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at t he direction of the Court.

April 6, 2018 

# Order

Clerk April 6, 2018

157095

BENJAMIN CIOTTI, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 157095 v COA: 332792 Wayne CC: 13-013366-NI ANDRE HARRIS and A. D. TRANSPORTATION EXPRESS, INC., Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation signed by couns el for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of the application for leave to appea l is considered, and the application for leave to appeal i s DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
#### § 5.57 Notification of hazards to interfacing persons.

If a person required to have an SMS under this part identifies a hazard in the operating environment, the person must provide notice of the hazard to any interfacing person that, to the best of the person's knowledge, could address the hazard or mitigate the risk. For the purpose of this section, interfacing persons are those that contribute to the safety of the certificate or Letter of Authorization holder's aviation-related products and services.

[Doc. No. FAA-2021-0419, Amdt. 5-2, 89 FR 33107, Apr. 26, 2024]
#### § 100.613 Contracting for collection services.

The NLRB may contract for collection services in order to recover delinquent debts only if the debts are not subject to the DCIA requirement to transfer claims or debts to Treasury for debt collection services, e.g., claims or debts of less than 180 days delinquent. However, the NLRB retains the authority to resolve disputes, compromise claims, suspend or terminate collection action, and initiate enforced collection through litigation. When appropriate, the NLRB shall contract for collection services in accordance with guidance and standards contained in 31 CFR chapter IX parts 900-904.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Alton L. Boynton, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
August 14, 2009





/s/ Alton L. BoyntonAlton
      L. BoyntonPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive, Financial and Accounting
Officer)