alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

          - [I.D. 050800C] 

The Department of Commerce has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). 

*Agency*: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).                 

*Title*: StormReady Application Form.                 

*Agency Form Number(s)*: None.                 

*OMB Approval Number*: None.                 

*Type of Request*: Emergency.                 

*Burden Hours*: 40.                 

*Number of Respondents*: 40.                 

*Average Hours Per Response*: 1.                 

*Needs and Uses*: StormReady is a community-recognition program for emergency management. The StormReady Application Form allows the National Weather Service to collect the information needed to recognize communities that are sufficiently prepared for adverse weather before an event happens.                 

*Affected Public*: State, Local, or Tribal Governments.                 

*Frequency*: On occasion, biennial.                 

*Respondent's Obligation*: Voluntary.                 

*OMB Desk Officer*: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.                 

Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, (202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, Room 5027, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at lengelme@doc.gov). 

Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. 

Dated: May 5, 2000. 

Madeleine Clayton, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 00-12031 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-KE-F
#### § 33.33 Vibration.

The engine must be designed and constructed to function throughout its normal operating range of crankshaft rotational speeds and engine powers without inducing excessive stress in any of the engine parts because of vibration and without imparting excessive vibration forces to the aircraft structure.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



I, Mark F. Travis, the Chief Executive Officer of Intrepid Capital Corporation
(the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

         1.       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
                  quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  September 19, 2003

                                    By: /s/ Mark F. Travis
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Mark F. Travis, Chief Executive Officer
§ 13.55 Administrative Law Judge proceedings. ( a ) *Jurisdiction.* The Office of Administrative Law Judges has jurisdiction to hear and decide appeals concerning questions of law and fact from the Administrator's investigative findings letters issued under §§ 13.51 and 13.52.
( b ) *Proposed findings of fact, conclusions, and order.* Within 20 calendar days of filing of the transcript of the testimony or such additional time as the Administrative Law Judge may allow, each party may file with the Administrative Law Judge proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a proposed order, together with a supporting brief expressing the reasons for such proposals. Each party shall serve such proposals and brief on all other parties.
( c ) *Decision.* ( 1 ) Within a reasonable period of time after the time allowed for filing of proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order, or within 30 calendar days of receipt of an agreement containing consent findings and order disposing of the disputed matter in whole, the Administrative Law Judge shall issue a decision. The decision shall contain appropriate findings, conclusions, and an order, and be served upon all parties to the proceeding.
( 2 ) If the respondent is found to have violated Executive Order 13706 or this part, and if the Administrator requested debarment, the Administrative Law Judge shall issue an order as to whether the respondent is to be subject to the excluded parties list, including findings that the contractor disregarded its obligations to employees or subcontractors under the Executive Order or this part.
( d ) *Limit on scope of review.* The Equal Access to Justice Act, as amended, does not apply to proceedings under this part. Accordingly, Administrative Law Judges shall have no authority to award attorney's fees and/or other litigation expenses pursuant to the provisions of the Equal Access to Justice Act for any proceeding under this part.
( e ) *Orders.* If the Administrative Law Judge concludes a violation occurred, the final order shall mandate action to remedy the violation, including any monetary or equitable relief described in § 13.44. Where the Administrator has sought imposition of debarment, the Administrative Law Judge shall determine whether an order imposing debarment is appropriate.
( f ) *Finality.* The Administrative Law Judge's decision shall become the final order of the Secretary, unless a timely petition for review is filed with the Administrative Review Board.
§ 65.75 Knowledge requirements. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, each applicant for a mechanic certificate or rating must, after meeting the applicable experience requirements of § 65.77, pass a written test, appropriate to the rating sought, which includes the aeronautical knowledge subject areas contained in the Aviation Mechanic General, Airframe, and Powerplant Airman Certification Standards (incorporated by reference, see § 65.23), as appropriate to the rating sought.
( b ) The applicant must pass each section of the test before applying for the oral and practical tests prescribed by § 65.79. A report of the written test is sent to the applicant.
( c ) An applicant for a mechanic certificate or rating may take the mechanic general written test prior to meeting the applicable experience requirements of § 65.77, provided the applicant presents an authenticated document from a certificated aviation maintenance technician school that demonstrates satisfactory completion of the general portion of the school's curriculum and specifies the completion date.
[Doc. No. 1179, 27 FR 7973, Aug. 10, 1962, as amended by Amdt. 65-1, 27 FR 10410, Oct. 25, 1962; Docket No. FAA-2021-0237, Amdt. No. 65-63, 87 FR 31414, May 24, 2022]
#### WILSON v EAST CLEVELAND (city)

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21402.

Decided June 19, 1929

Syllabus by

ROBINSON, J.

MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS

(360 P4h) A municipality is without power to prescribe ,a condition precedent *381to the attachment of liability for a breach of the duty imposed upon it by 3714 GC.

Marshall, CJ, Kinkade, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, J, concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of FairPoint Communications, Inc.(the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, EugeneB. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

1.                 The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ Eugene B. Johnson                      |     |
|--------------------------------------------|----------|
| Eugene B. Johnson*Chief Executive Officer* | * * |
| May 29,  2007                         | * * |

 

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
§ 61.16 Refusal to submit to an alcohol test or to furnish test results. A refusal to submit to a test to indicate the percentage by weight of alcohol in the blood, when requested by a law enforcement officer in accordance with § 91.17(c) of this chapter, or a refusal to furnish or authorize the release of the test results requested by the Administrator in accordance with § 91.17(c) or (d) of this chapter, is grounds for: ( a ) Denial of an application for any certificate, rating, or authorization issued under this part for a period of up to 1 year after the date of that refusal; or
( b ) Suspension or revocation of any certificate, rating, or authorization issued under this part.
§ 33.17 Fire protection. ( a ) The design and construction of the engine and the materials used must minimize the probability of the occurrence and spread of fire during normal operation and failure conditions, and must minimize the effect of such a fire. In addition, the design and construction of turbine engines must minimize the probability of the occurrence of an internal fire that could result in structural failure or other hazardous effects.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, each external line, fitting, and other component, which contains or conveys flammable fluid during normal engine operation, must be fire resistant or fireproof, as determined by the Administrator. Components must be shielded or located to safeguard against the ignition of leaking flammable fluid.
( c ) A tank, which contains flammable fluids and any associated shut-off means and supports, which are part of and attached to the engine, must be fireproof either by construction or by protection unless damage by fire will not cause leakage or spillage of a hazardous quantity of flammable fluid. For a reciprocating engine having an integral oil sump of less than 23.7 liters capacity, the oil sump need not be fireproof or enclosed by a fireproof shield.
( d ) An engine component designed, constructed, and installed to act as a firewall must be: ( 1 ) Fireproof;
( 2 ) Constructed so that no hazardous quantity of air, fluid or flame can pass around or through the firewall; and,
( 3 ) Protected against corrosion;
( e ) In addition to the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, engine control system components that are located in a designated fire zone must be fire resistant or fireproof, as determined by the Administrator.
( f ) Unintentional accumulation of hazardous quantities of flammable fluid within the engine must be prevented by draining and venting.
( g ) Any components, modules, or equipment, which are susceptible to or are potential sources of static discharges or electrical fault currents must be designed and constructed to be properly grounded to the engine reference, to minimize the risk of ignition in external areas where flammable fluids or vapors could be present.
[Doc. No. FAA-2007-28503, 74 FR 37930, July 30, 2009]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11614]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP97-287-049]


El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

May 4, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 1, 2000, El Paso Natural Gas Company (El 
Paso) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1-A, the following tariff sheets, to become 
effective April, 1, 2000:

Twenty-Ninth Revised Sheet No. 30
Twenty-Fourth Revised Sheet No. 31
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 31A

    El Paso states that the above tariff sheets are being filed to 
implement five negotiated rate contracts pursuant to the Commission's 
Statement of Policy on Alternatives to Traditional Cost-of-Service 
Ratemaking for Natural Gas Pipelines and Regulation of Negotiated 
Transportation Services of Natural Gas Pipelines issued January 31, 
1996 at Docket Nos. RM95-6-000 and RM96-7-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-11614 Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
im APR ! i P > 32 

SERVED: APRIL'11, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

PATHFINDER AVIATION, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penally Case) 

DMSFAA-20I2-0028 

ORDER DENYING MOTION 

AND ACCEPTING ANSWER 

Complainant Federal Aviation Adminislration ("Complainant") on March 30, 

2012, filed a Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted ("Motion"). It cited the-failure of 

Respondent Pathfinder Aviation, Inc. ("Respondent") to file a timely Answer to its 

Complaint. 

Respondent, under date of April 3, 2012, filed a letter which in part purports to be 

its Answer. Respondent, which is pro se, also asserts that it failed to file a timely answer 

because it was unaware of its proper responsibilities against the background of confusing 

regulations. 

For good cause shown, I hereby accept Respondent's filing as its Answer to 

Complainant's Complaint. I note also that no prejudice to Complainant resulting from 
Respondent's untimely Answer has been demonstrated. Additionally, Complaint's 

Motion to Deem Alle'ialions Admitted is denied.' 'fc ' 

SO ORDERED. 

Riciiard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

' Because a hearing is "funciamen(al" to ihe concept of due process, the Administrator has heM thai 

"Iwlherever possible, cases should be disposed of on ihe merits after a hearing, rather ihan summarily 

because of a procedural defect." Dtn'ld Lloyd ComwalL FAA Order No. 92-47 (July 22, 1992). p. 7. 
FDMSNo. FAA-2012-0028 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbuv Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Michael W. Fell, President 

Pathfinder Aviation, Inc. 

P.O. Box 375 

Homer, AK 99603 

TEL: 907-299-2800 

FAX: 907-299-2801 

Glenn H. Brown, ComplainatU 's Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 W. 7*^ Avenue #14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5271 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administralive Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, iVI-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (EIl-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant/Paralegal 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

^ Sen'icc was by U.S. Mail. For sei^'ice in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WI000. Washington, 

DC 20591. Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30.
#### § 93.93 Description of area.

The Los Angeles Special Flight Rules Area is designated as that part of Area A of the Los Angeles Class B airspace area at 3,500 feet above mean sea level (MSL) and at 4,500 feet MSL, beginning at Ballona Creek/Pacific Ocean (lat. 33°57′42′′ N, long. 118°27′23′′ W), then eastbound along Manchester Blvd. to the intersection of Manchester/405 Freeway (lat. 33°57′42′′ N, long. 118°22′10′′ W), then southbound along the 405 Freeway to the intersection of the 405 Freeway/lmperial Highway (lat. 33°55′51′′ N, long. 118°22′06′′ W), then westbound along Imperial Highway to the intersection of Imperial Highway/Pacific Ocean (lat. 33°55′51′′ N, long. 118°26′05′′ W), then northbound along the shoreline to the point of beginning.
#### § 63.14 [Reserved]
#### § 33.3 General.

Each applicant must show that the aircraft engine concerned meets the applicable requirements of this part.
Exhibit 23.3


                        CONSENT OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.


As  independent  petroleum  consultants to The Houston  Exploration  Company and
KeySpan Exploration and Production,  LLC, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report  included in this Form 10-K/A of KeySpan  Corporation and into the
KeySpan  Corporation's   previously  filed  Registration  Statements  File  Nos.
333-53657, 333-53765, 333-92003, 333-79151, 333-40472, 333-43768 and 333-60294.


                                                MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.


                                                /s/ James A. Cole
                                                ---------------------
                                                James A. Cole
                                                Senior Vice President

April 16, 2002
Houston, Texas
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

     In connection with the Annual Report of Hudson Respiratory Care Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"),
I, Charles A. French, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, to my knowledge, that:

     1.   The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                           /s/ Charles A. French
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Charles A. French
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer
                                           March 24, 2003
§ 102.133 Penalties and enforcement. ( a ) Where the nature and circumstances of a prohibited communication made by or caused to be made by a party to the proceeding are such that the interests of justice and statutory policy may require remedial action, the Board, the Administrative Law Judge, or the Regional Director, as the case may be, may issue to the party making the communication a Notice to Show Cause, returnable before the Board within a stated period not less than 7 days from the date of issuance, why the Board may not determine that the interests of justice and statutory policy require that the claim or interest in the proceeding of a party who knowingly makes a prohibited communication, or knowingly causes a prohibited communication to be made may be dismissed, denied, disregarded, or otherwise adversely affected on account of such violation.
( b ) Upon notice and hearing, the Board may censure, suspend, or revoke the privilege of practice before the Agency of any person who knowingly and willfully makes or solicits the making of a prohibited *ex parte* communication. However, before the Board institutes formal proceedings under this paragraph (b), it will first advise the person or persons concerned in writing that it proposes to take such action and that they may show cause, within a period to be stated in such written advice, but not less than 7 days from the date thereof, why it may not take such action.
( c ) The Board may censure, or, to the extent permitted by law, suspend, dismiss, or institute proceedings for the dismissal of, any Board agent who knowingly and willfully violates the prohibitions and requirements of this rule.
[82 FR 11778, Feb. 24, 2017]
#### HANCOCK et ux. v. LITTLE.

No. 32290.

Oct. 14, 1947.

*185 P. 2d 462.*

H. F. Fulling, of Tulsa, for plaintiffs in error.

*257Joe W. Simpson, of Tulsa, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

Defendants have appealed from a judgment entered against them in the trial court, and on October 6, 1945, filed their brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The plaintiff has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated by this court in Durham v. Brown, 164 Okla. 139, 24 P. 2d 295, it is not the duty of this court to search the record to find some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause may be reversed and remanded, with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to the trial court to vacate the judgment entered for the plaintiff and to enter a judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $582.82, said judgment to draw interest from the date of the entry thereof.

HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, WELCH, CORN, GIBSON, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard R. Sawyer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
Richard R. Sawyer
 
 Richard
R. Sawyer
 Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary
 (November
14), 2008