alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Take notice that on January 5, 2000, Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company (ESNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, certain revised tariff sheets in the above captioned docket bear a proposed effective date of February 1, 2000.

                    ESNG states that the purpose of this instant filing is to track rate changes attributable to a storage service purchased from Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Columbia) under its Rate Schedules FSS and SST.                     Start Printed Page 2938                    The costs of the above referenced storage service comprise the rates and charges payable under ESNG's Rate Schedule CFSS. This tracking filing is being made pursuant to Section 3 of ESNG's Rate Schedule CFSS.                

ESNG states that copies of the filing have been served upon its jurisdictional customers and interested State Commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-1186 Filed 1-18-00:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
632 A.2d 767

#### In re JASON W.

No. 43,

Sept. Term, 1993.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Nov. 8, 1993.

Mary Ann Ince, Asst. Atty. Gen. argued and briefed (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen. of Maryland, on brief), Baltimore, for petitioner.

Victoria S. Lansburgh, Asst. Public Defender, argued and briefed (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender, on brief) Baltimore, for respondent.

*510Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, McAULIFFE, CHASANOW, KARWACKI and ROBERT M. BELL, JJ.

ORDER

The petition for writ of certiorari in the above entitled case having been granted and heard, it is this 8th day of November, 1993

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.
# EUR-Lex - 31995R1809 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995R1809

**COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1809/95 of 25 July 1995 establishing unit values for the determination of the customs value of certain perishable goods **

*
Official Journal L 175 , 27/07/1995 P. 0001 - 0006 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1809/95 of 25 July 1995 establishing unit values for the determination of the customs value of certain perishable goods

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (2), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1762/95 (3), and in particular Article 173 (1) thereof,

Whereas Articles 173 to 177 of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 provide that the Commission shall periodically establish unit values for the products referred to in the classification in Annex 26 to that Regulation;

Whereas the result of applying the rules and criteria laid down in the abovementioned Articles to the elements communicated to the Commission in accordance with Article 173 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 is that unit values set out in the Annex to this Regulation should be established in regard to the products in question,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The unit values provided for in Article 173 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 are hereby established as set out in the table in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 July 1995.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 July 1995.

For the Commission Mario MONTI Member of the Commission

ANNEX

>TABLE>
#### Stephen H. Mason, Appellant, *v.*Village of Munsey Park, Respondent. In the Matter of Stephen H. Mason, Appellant, against Fred W. Wulfing, as Mayor of the Village of Munsey Park, et al., Respondents.

Submitted March 22, 1937;

decided March 25, 1937.

*645
      *C. Malcolm Dowsey*for appellant.

*Herman Block*for respondents.

Motions to withdraw appeals taken as of right granted.
Editorial Note on Part 43
Editorial Note: For miscellaneous technical amendments to this part 43, see Amdt. 43-3, 31 FR 3336, Mar. 3, 1966, and Amdt. 43-6, 31 FR 9211, July 6, 1966.

§ 43.5 Approval for return to service after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration. No person may approve for return to service any aircraft, airframe, aircraft engine, propeller, or appliance, that has undergone maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless— ( a ) The maintenance record entry required by § 43.9 or § 43.11, as appropriate, has been made;
( b ) The repair or alteration form authorized by or furnished by the Administrator has been executed in a manner prescribed by the Administrator; and
( c ) If a repair or an alteration results in any change in the aircraft operating limitations or flight data contained in the approved aircraft flight manual, those operating limitations or flight data are appropriately revised and set forth as prescribed in § 91.9 of this chapter.
[Doc. No. 1993, 29 FR 5451, Apr. 23, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 43-23, 47 FR 41084, Sept. 16, 1982; Amdt. 43-31, 54 FR 34330, Aug. 18, 1989]
EXHIBIT  32.1  --  CERTIFICATION  OF  CHIEF  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER OF FIRST CAPITAL
INTERNATIONAL,  INC.,  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
AND  SECTION  1350  OF  18  U.S.C.  63.


I,  Alex Genin, the Chief Executive Officer of First Capital International, Inc.
hereby  certify that First Capital International, Inc.'s periodic report on Form
10QSB  and  the  financial  statements contained therein fully complies with the
requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15  U.S.C.  78m or 78o(d) and that information contained in the periodic report
on  Form 10QSB and the financial statements contained therein fairly represents,
in  all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
of  First  Capital  International,  Inc.

Date:  May 13, 2004             /s/ Alex Genin
                                Chief Executive Officer of
                                First Capital International,
Inc.


<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amalgamated Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Irwin
Gross, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


/s/ Irwin Gross
------------------------
Name:  Irwin Gross
Title:    Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
         (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
Date:    August 20, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE OF FLORIDA v THRUSH

Case No. 90-125AC

Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Dade County

April 17, 1991

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Robert A. Butterwortb, Attorney General and Joan L. Greenberg, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Before SHAPIRO, ROTHENBERG, KORNBLUM, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida appeals from an order suppressing the results of a blood test. For the reasons set forth herein, this order is reversed.

*12Appellee, Harold Thrush, was cited for driving under the influence of alcohol when a police officer came across a single car accident. The officer smelled alcohol on appellee’s breath and received other information concerning appellee’s erratic driving just prior to the accident. Paramedics, at the officer’s request, took samples of appellee’s blood at the scene before appellee was transported to a nearby hospital.

Prior to trial, appellee moved to suppress the blood test evidence. He argued that he had not appeared at a medical facility for treatment as a result of the accident, that the use of a breath or urine test would not have been impractical or impossible, that he had objected to the blood test and that he had not been informed he had alternatives to the test.

The lower court made specific findings of fact, one of which was that appellee consented to having his blood drawn. The court, relying on *State v Perez,*531 So.2d 961 (Fla. 1988) and *Chu v State,*521 So.2d 330 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), granted the motion to suppress. With due respect to the lower court, her ruling was incorrect.

The issue of the implied consent law is, in actuality, a non-issue in this case. It became so when appellee voluntarily consented to having his blood drawn. The test results regarding this blood are admissible. *Pardo v State,*429 So.2d 1313 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

The order granting the motion to suppress is reversed and this case is remanded for trial with instructions to the court to admit the test results if all other necessary criteria are met.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.
United States Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave. , SE West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 Wa sh ingto n, DC 20590 May 13,2015

RE: Amendment to Exemption No. 11367, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0106
Dear Sir or Madam: We are writing pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and the procedures contained in 14 C.F.R. 11, to request that ADM Crop Risk Services, Inc. ("ADMCRS"), an already FAA approved owner and operator of small unmanned aircraft to add another aircraft to its crop scouting operations. We appreciate the FAA for approving our petition to operate the DJI Phantom 2 and now we ask to operate the Precision Hawk Lancaster Hawkeye Mk-111 to enhance and grow our offerings to our customers. We see a great advantage operating this fixed wing UAS as it will add greater operational capabilities to our portfolio of services. We respectfully write that the FAA approve our request . Name and Address of Applicant 

### is: ADM Crop Risk Services Attn: Brian Young, Vice President Claims Department 350 North Water Street Decatur IL 62523 Main Office 1-888-523-6277 Fax 1 -217-451-7829 Email : byoung@admcrs.com Our request is similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of Exemption Nos. 11345 and 11274 for PrecisionHawk Inc. and USAA respectively. ADMCRS has a vested inte rest to operate and maintain these aircraft per the specifications outlined by PrecisionHawk Inc. in the manual. ADMCRS personnel will be trained by PrecisionHawk Inc. on howto operate and maintain 1the Hawkeye Mk-111. We will operate within all of the 

### 31 guidelines as outlined by the conditions and limitations section of PrecisionHawk's exemption no. 

### 11345. These would include, but are not limited to: Hawkeye Mk-111 Weight less than 

### 55 pounds UAS operation not exceeded 87 knots 

### (100 miles per hour) UAS operation at altitude under

### 400 feet above ground level UAS operated within visua l li ne of sight (VLOS) Operations always utilizing a visual observer (VO) Pre-flight and post-flight inspections performed on UAS No operation within 5 nautical miles of an airport UAS operat ions will remain clear and give way to all manned aviation activities
ADMCRS respectfully requests that the FAA grant its request to operate the PrecisionHawk Hawkeye MK-111. Thank you for your timely consideration.
Sincerely,

Brian Young, Vice President of Claims ADM Crop Risk Services



### 2
§ 48.10 Definitions. For purposes of this part, the following definitions apply: *Citizen of the United States or U.S. citizen* means one of the following: ( 1 ) An individual who is a citizen of the United States or one of its possessions.
( 2 ) A partnership each of whose partners is an individual who is a citizen of the United States.
( 3 ) A corporation or association organized under the laws of the United States or a State, the District of Columbia, or a territory or possession of the United States, of which the president and at least two-thirds of the board of directors and other managing officers are citizens of the United States, which is under the actual control of citizens of the United States, and in which at least 75 percent of the voting interest is owned or controlled by persons that are citizens of the United States.
*Registry* means the FAA, Civil Aviation Registry, Aircraft Registration Branch.
*Resident alien* means an individual citizen of a foreign country lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States as an immigrant in conformity with the regulations of the Department of Homeland Security (8 CFR Chapter 1).
#### §§ 91.884-91.899 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the question of whether instruments of equivalent scientific value, for the purposes for which the instruments shown below are intended to be used, are being manufactured in the United States. 

Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and be filed within 20 days with the Statutory Import Programs Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230. Applications may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 

Docket Number: 00-011. Applicant: University of Michigan, 930 N. University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1055. Instrument: Electron Beam Evaporator, Model EGN4. Manufacturer: Oxford Applied Research, United Kingdom. Intended Use: The instrument is intended to be used for studies of how various materials interact with thin metal films. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: April 21, 2000. 

Docket Number: 00-013. Applicant: Allegheny-Singer Research Institute, 320 East North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15212-4772. Instrument: Robot and Microplate Manipulator, Model Q-Bot. Manufacturer: Genetix Limited, United Kingdom. Intended Use: The instrument is intended to be used to prepare addressable libraries of DNA clones (both genomic and cDNA) for comparative gene expression studies (the basis of the science of functional genomics) to understand the differences between normal physiologic processes. The instrument will also be used for educational objectives through teaching trainees in the most current means to comparatively evaluate differences in gene expression. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: April 21, 2000. 

Frank W. Creel, 

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff. 

[FR Doc. 00-11468 Filed 5-5-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
# L_2007076DE.01003502.xml

| 16.3.2007 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 76/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2007

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 76/35

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 97/2/EG des Rates vom 20. Januar 1997 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 91/629/EWG über Mindestanforderungen für den Schutz von Kälbern

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 25 vom 28. Januar 1997
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 25 vom 28. Januar 1997

Seite 24, Artikel 1 Nummer 1 (betreffend Artikel 3 Absatz 3 Unterabsatz 1 Buchstabe b der Richtlinie 91/629/EWG):

anstatt:

| „b) | Für Kälber in Gruppenhaltung ist die jedem Kalb uneingeschränkt verfügbare Fläche zumindest gleich 1,5 m2 für jedes Kalb mit einem Lebendgewicht von weniger als 150 kg, zumindest 1,7 m2 für jedes Kalb mit einem Lebendgewicht von mehr als 150 kg, aber weniger als 220 kg und zumindest 1,8 m2 für jedes Kalb mit einem Lebendgewicht von über 220 kg.“ |
| --- | --- |

„b)

Für Kälber in Gruppenhaltung ist die jedem Kalb uneingeschränkt verfügbare Fläche zumindest gleich 1,5 m2 für jedes Kalb mit einem Lebendgewicht von weniger als 150 kg, zumindest 1,7 m2 für jedes Kalb mit einem Lebendgewicht von mehr als 150 kg, aber weniger als 220 kg und zumindest 1,8 m2 für jedes Kalb mit einem Lebendgewicht von über 220 kg.“

2

2

2

muss es heißen:

| „b) | Für Kälber in Gruppenhaltung ist die jedem Kalb uneingeschränkt verfügbare Fläche zumindest gleich 1,5 m2 für jedes Kalb mit einem Lebendgewicht von weniger als 150 kg, zumindest 1,7 m2 für jedes Kalb mit einem Lebendgewicht von 150 kg oder mehr, aber weniger als 220 kg, und zumindest 1,8 m2 für jedes Kalb mit einem Lebendgewicht von 220 kg oder mehr.“ |
| --- | --- |

„b)

Für Kälber in Gruppenhaltung ist die jedem Kalb uneingeschränkt verfügbare Fläche zumindest gleich 1,5 m2 für jedes Kalb mit einem Lebendgewicht von weniger als 150 kg, zumindest 1,7 m2 für jedes Kalb mit einem Lebendgewicht von 150 kg oder mehr, aber weniger als 220 kg, und zumindest 1,8 m2 für jedes Kalb mit einem Lebendgewicht von 220 kg oder mehr.“

2

2

2

---
§ 63.41 Retesting after failure. An applicant for a flight engineer certificate who fails a written test or practical test for that certificate may apply for retesting— ( a ) After 30 days after the date he failed that test; or
( b ) After he has received additional practice or instruction (flight, synthetic trainer, or ground training, or any combination thereof) that is necessary, in the opinion of the Administrator or the applicant's instructor (if the Administrator has authorized him to determine the additional instruction necessary) to prepare the applicant for retesting.
Exhibit
10.1


 





 


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:


 


November 9, 2009


 


Media
Contact:


Roger
Johnson, Overstock.com, Inc.


+1
(801) 947-4430


rojohnson@overstock.com


 


Investor
Contact:


Kevin
Moon, Overstock.com, Inc.


+1
(801) 947-3282


kmoon@overstock.com


 


Overstock.com
Announces Filing of Form 12b-25


 


SALT LAKE CITY, November 9, 2009 / — Overstock.com, Inc. (Nasdaq: OSTK) announced today that it has  filed a Form 12b-25 (Notification of Late Filing) with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. The Company intends to file its Form 10-Q within the 5-day extension period afforded by SEC Rule 12b-25.
 


The Company is continuing to analyze the
proper accounting treatment for $785,000 the Company received during the first
quarter of 2009 as repayment under a new agreement with a vendor for amounts
the Company overpaid to the vendor in 2008 and early 2009.  The Company believes the amount is properly
recognizable in the first quarter of 2009, when the cash was received.  However, the Company is continuing to review
the issue, and may ultimately conclude that the amount should have been
recognized in 2008.


 


About Overstock.com


 


Overstock.com, Inc.
is an online retailer offering brand-name merchandise at discount prices. The
company offers its customers an opportunity to shop for bargains conveniently,
while offering its suppliers an alternative inventory distribution channel.
Overstock.com, headquartered in Salt Lake City, is a publicly traded company
listed on the NASDAQ Global Market System and can be found online at
http://www.overstock.com. Overstock.com regularly posts information about the
company and other related matters on its website under the heading “Investor
Relations.”


 


Overstock.com(R) is
a registered trademark of Overstock.com, Inc. All other trademarks are the
property of their respective owners.


 

















 


This press release
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.  Our Form 10-K/A for the
year ended December 31, 2008, our subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, or any
amendments thereto, and our other subsequent filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission identify important factors that could cause our actual
results to differ materially from those contained in any of our projections,
estimates or forward-looking statements.
TRANSFER TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL CORP.




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of Transfer Technology International Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert J. Calamunci, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/  Robert J. Calamunci

_____________________________________

Robert J. Calamunci

Chief Financial Officer

Chief Accounting Officer

June 24, 2010




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.