Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 93 / Wednesday, May 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 27487 

accumulating 6,000 hours TIS on the wing 

structure or within 100 hours TIS after June 

18, 2014 (the effective date of this AD), 

whichever occurs later, follow Vulcanair 

Aircraft, P68 Variants, Maintenance Manual 

Supplement NOR10.771–52, 1st Issue, dated 

March 1, 2010. You may take ‘‘unless already 

done’’ credit for this inspection if inspected 

in compliance with AD 2008–24–11, 

Amendment 39–15751 (73 FR 72314; 

November 28, 2008); or 

(ii) For aircraft that have exceeded the safe 

life limit hours TIS on the wing structure as 

determined in paragraph (f)(2) of this AD: 

Within 100 hours TIS after June 18, 2014 (the 

effective date of this AD), follow Vulcanair 

Aircraft, P68 Variants, Mandatory Service 

Bulletin No. 162, dated March 1, 2010. 

(5) Before accumulating 8,500 hours TIS 

since new on the stabilator, within 500 hours 

TIS after January 2, 2009 (the effective date 

of AD 2008–24–11, Amendment 39–15751 

(73 FR 72314; November 28, 2008)), or within 

500 hours TIS from the last inspection done 

in compliance with AD 2008–24–11, 

whichever occurs later, do the initial 

inspection of the stabilator following 

paragraph 2.2 of Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 

Variants, Maintenance Manual Supplement 

NOR10.771–52, 1st Issue, dated March 1, 

2010, or Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants, 

Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 120, 

Revision 1, dated June 7, 2006. Repetitively 

thereafter inspect the stabilator following the 

limitations in Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 

Variants, Maintenance Manual Supplement 

NOR10.771–52, 1st Issue, dated March 1, 

2010. 

(6) If any cracks are found during the 

inspections required in paragraphs (f)(4) and/ 

or (f)(5) of this AD, before further flight, 

modify the wing structure following 

Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants, Mandatory 

Service Bulletin No. 162, dated March 1, 

2010. 

(7) For certain Model P 68 airplanes, AD 

2009–24–03, Amendment 39–16090 (74 FR 

62211, November 27, 2009) requires 

repetitive inspections of the front and rear 

wing spars for cracks and modification if 

cracks are found. The modification 

terminates the repetitive inspections required 

in AD 2009–24–03 and may be done 

regardless if cracks are found. The actions of 

AD 2009–24–03 are independent of this AD 

action and remain in effect. 

(8) EASA AD No.: 2010–0051, dated March 

25, 2010; Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants, 

Maintenance Manual Supplement 

NOR10.771–52, 1st Issue, dated March 1, 

2010; Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants, 

Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 162, dated 

March 1, 2010; Vulcanair S.p.A. Service 

Instruction No. 88, dated March 1, 2010; and 

Vulcanair S.p.A. Service Instruction No. 89, 

dated March 1, 2010, base the required 

preventive and corrective actions on allowing 

flight with known cracks in critical structure. 

The FAA’s Small Airplane Directorate does 

not allow further flight with known cracks in 

critical structure without additional 

substantiating data. Advisory Circular (AC) 

23–13A, Chapter 6, dated September 29, 

2005, describes what additional data is 

required to allow flight with known cracks 

(found on the Internet at http://rgl.faa.gov/

Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/

rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf). 

(g) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office, 

FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs 

for this AD, if requested using the procedures 

found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to 

ATTN: Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Safety 

Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 

901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; 

telephone: (816) 329–4144; fax: (816) 329– 

4090; email: mike.kiesov@faa.gov. Before 

using any approved AMOC on any airplane 

to which the AMOC applies, notify your 

appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the 

FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), 

or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(h) Related Information 

Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety 

Agency (EASA) AD No. 2010–0051, dated 

March 25, 2010, for related information. You 

may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on 

the Internet at: http://www.regulations.gov/

#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-0602-0002. 

You may also review Vulcanair S.p.A. 

Service Instruction No. 88, dated March 1, 

2010; and Vulcanair S.p.A. Service 

Instruction No. 89, dated March 1, 2010, for 

related information, which may be found 

using the information found in paragraph (i). 

(i) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(3) The following service information was 

approved for IBR on June 18, 2014 (the 

effective date of this AD). 

(i) Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants, 

Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 162, dated 

March 1, 2010. 

(ii) Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants, 

Maintenance Manual Supplement 

NOR10.771–52, 1st Issue, dated March 1, 

2010. 

(4) The following service information was 

approved for IBR on January 2, 2009. 

(i) Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants, 

Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 120, 

Revision 1, dated June 7, 2006. 

(ii) Reserved. 

(5) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Vulcanair Airworthiness 

Office, Via G Pascoli, 7, 80026 Casoria, Italy; 

phone: +39 081 59 18 135; fax: +39 081 59 

18 172; email: airworthiness@vulcanair.com; 

Internet: http://www.vulcanair.com/pageview.php?pagename=Service Bulletins. 

(6) You may review copies of the 

referenced service information at the FAA, 

Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, 

Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information 

on the availability of this material at the 

FAA, call (816) 329–4148. 

(7) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April 

30, 2014. 

Earl Lawrence, 

Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 

Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–10789 Filed 5–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

32 CFR PART 241 

[Docket ID: DOD–2014–OS–0052; RIN 0790– 

AJ27] 

Pilot Program for the Temporary 

Exchange of Information Technology 

Personnel 

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), 

Office of the DoD Chief Information 

Officer (DoD CIO). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This part assigns 

responsibilities and provides 

procedures for implementing a Pilot 

Program for the Temporary Exchange of 

Information Technology Personnel, 

known as the Information Technology 

Exchange Program pilot. This Pilot is 

envisioned to promote the interchange 

of DoD and private sector IT 

professionals to enhance skills and 

competencies. Given the changing 

workforce dynamics in the IT field, DoD 

needs to take advantage of these types 

of professional development programs 

to proactively position itself to keep 

pace with the changes in technology. 

The ITEP pilot will serve the public 

good by enhancing the DoD IT 

workforce skills to protect and defend 

our nation. The ITEP Pilot expired 

September 31, 2013. Congress has 

extended the expiration date to 

September 30, 2018, and the reporting 

requirements through 2018. This final 

rule makes amendments to the current 

DoD ITEP regulation to update these 

dates. 

DATES: This rule is effective May 14, 

2014. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
27488 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 93 / Wednesday, May 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary 

Evans, 571–372–4493. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Executive Summary 

I. Purpose of This Regulatory Action 

a. The ITEP Pilot is envisioned to 

promote the interchange of DoD and 

private sector IT professionals to 

enhance skills and competencies. Given 

the changing workforce dynamics in the 

IT field, DoD needs to take advantage of 

these types of professional development 

programs to proactively position itself to 

keep pace with the changes in 

technology. 

b. This regulation implements section 

1110 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 

(Pub. L. 111–84), which authorizes DoD 

to implement a Pilot Program for the 

Temporary Exchange of Information 

Technology (IT) Personnel. This statute 

authorizes the temporary assignment of 

DoD IT employees to private sector 

organizations. This statute also gives 

DoD the authority to accept private 

sector IT employees assigned under the 

Pilot. 

II. Summary of the Major Provisions of 

This Regulatory Action 

This Pilot Program (‘‘Pilot’’) is 

authorized by section 1110 of the NDAA 

for FY2010 (Pub. L. 111–84). Section 

1110 authorizes DoD Components to 

assign exceptional IT employees to a 

private sector organization for purposes 

of training, development and sharing of 

best practices. It also gives DoD 

Components the authority to accept 

comparable IT employees on an 

assignment from the private sector for 

the training and development purposes 

and sharing of best practices and insight 

of government practices. 

III. Costs and Benefits of This 

Regulatory Action 

The cost of employee’s salary and 

benefits will be paid by the originating 

employer. It is anticipated that the 

benefit will outweigh the cost to manage 

this program and any additional cost 

would be related to travel or cost to 

attend training or conferences. 

Regulatory Procedures 

Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory 

Planning and Review’’ and Executive 

Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation 

and Regulatory Review’’ 

It has been certified that 32 CFR part 

241 does not: 

(1) Have an annual effect on the 

economy of $100 million or more, or 

may adversely affect in a material way 

the economy, a sector of the economy, 

productivity, competition, jobs, 

environment, public health or safety, or 

State, local or tribal governments or 

communities; 

(2) Create a serious inconsistency or 

otherwise interfere with an action taken 

or planned by another Agency; 

(3) Materially alter the budgetary 

impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, 

or loan programs, or the rights and 

obligations of recipients thereof; or 

(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues 

arising out of legal mandates, the 

President’s priorities, or the principles 

set forth in these Executive Orders. 

Section 202, Public Law 104–4, 

‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’ 

It has been certified that 32 CFR part 

241 does not contain a Federal mandate 

that may result in expenditure by State, 

local and tribal governments, in 

aggregate, or by the private sector, of 

$100 million or more in any one year. 

Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory 

Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 601) 

It has been certified that 32 CFR part 

241 is not subject to the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it 

would not, if promulgated, have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork 

Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) 

It has been certified that 32 CFR part 

241 does not impose reporting or 

recordkeeping requirements under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’ 

It has been certified that 32 CFR part 

241 does not have federalism 

implications, as set forth in Executive 

Order 13132. This rule does not have 

substantial direct effects on: 

(1) The States; 

(2) The relationship between the 

National Government and the States; or 

(3) The distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of Government. 

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 241 

Government employees, Information 

technology. 

Accordingly, 32 CFR part 241 is 

amended as follows: 

PART 241—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for 32 CFR 

part 241 is amended to read: 

Authority: Pub. L. 111–84, sec. 1110, as 

amended. 

■ 2. In § 241.6, revise paragraph (b) to 

read: 

§ 241.6 Length of details. 

(a) * * * 

(b) This extension may be granted in 

3-month increments not to exceed 1 

year. No assignment may commence 

after September 30, 2018. 

■ 3. In § 241.12, revise paragraph (a) to 

read: 

§ 241.12 Reporting requirements. 

(a) For each of fiscal years 2010 

through 2018, the Secretary of Defense 

shall submit annual reports to the 

congressional defense committees, not 

later than 1 month after the end of the 

fiscal year involved, a report on any 

activities carried out during such fiscal 

year, including the following 

information: 

(1) Respective organizations to and 

from which an employee is assigned; 

(2) Positions those employees held 

while they were so assigned; 

(3) Description of the tasks they 

performed while they were so assigned; 

and 

(4) Discussion of any actions that 

might be taken to improve the 

effectiveness of the Pilot program, 

including any proposed changes in the 

law. 

* * * * * 

Dated: May 9, 2014. 

Aaron Siegel, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 2014–11069 Filed 5–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 100 

[Docket No. USCG–2014–0192] 

Special Local Regulation; Annual 

Marine Events on the Colorado River, 

between Davis Dam (Bullhead City, AZ) 

and Headgate Dam (Parker, AZ) Within 

the San Diego Captain of the Port Zone 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of 

regulation. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce 

the 37th Annual Parker, AZ Tube Float 

marine event and associated waterway 

restriction special local regulations on 

June 7, 2014. This event occurs in the 

navigable waters of the Colorado River 

in Parker, Arizona, covering six miles 

from the La Paz County Park to the 

Headgate Dam. These special local 

regulations are necessary to provide for 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES