alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered January 11 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01324
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF D .D.A., A CHILD On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dall as County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 17
- 03029



### O RDER In accordance with this Court’s order dated December 17, 2018, appellant has provided written verification that she filed a Statement of Inability to Afford Court Costs with the District Clerk. Ac cordingly, appellant is entitled to a free record on appeal. See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 145(f).
W e ORDER Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk, and Francheska Duffey, Official Court Reporter for the 330th Judicial District Court, to file their respective r ecords WITHIN THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre, Ms. Duffey, and all parties.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
#### TOLEDO ARTIFICIAL LIMB CO v HAYES

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist,'Lucas County

No 2181.

Decided Feb 25, 1929

Orion W. Nelson, Toledo, for Limb Co.

Topper & Topper, Toledo, for Hayes.

BY THE COURT

We find that there is error in the record prejudicial to the plaintiff in error in two respects:

First: In permitting the witness Harry Commager, who was called by plaintiff, to testify over the objection and exception of the defendant, that he considered the word of plaintiff absolutely good. The reputation of the plaintiff for truth and veracity *199had not been put in issue by the defendant by calling witnesses to attack it.

Second: In refusing, to permit cross-examination of the plaintiff, who voluntarily . testified as a witness in his own behalf as to communications between himself and his former attorney. Spitzer, vs. Stillings, 109 Oh St., 297.

For the foregoing errors the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Williams, Lloyd and Richards, JJ, concur.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                    Ending
Class            Interest             Principal    Losses           Balance
<S>               <C>                  <C>            <C>           <C>
A1                4168964.8      13500689.29                0         86931310.7
A2                5868074.5      24830232.62                0       118234667.37
A3                464420.64                0                0           10717400
A4               1646950.74       1010141.55                0        37435458.45
APO                       0          30399.7                0          449478.16
AR                     0.54              100                0                  0
B1                115792.38         71020.15                0         2631979.84
B2                 77194.93         47346.77                0         1754653.23
B3                 32171.69         19732.21                0           731267.8
B4                 38597.47         23673.37                0          877326.61
B5                 19320.15         11849.82                0          439150.17
B6                 25735.18         11581.64           4202.8           584965.1


</TABLE>
§ 65.50 Currency requirements. The holder of an air traffic control tower operator certificate may not perform any duties under that certificate unless— ( a ) He has served for at least three of the preceding 6 months as an air traffic control tower operator at the control tower to which his facility rating applies, or at the operating positions for which he has qualified; or
( b ) He has shown that he meets the requirements for his certificate and facility rating at the control tower concerned, or for operating at positions for which he has previously qualified.
#### § 93.337 Requirements for operating in the DC SFRA.

A pilot conducting any type of flight operation in the DC SFRA must comply with the restrictions listed in this subpart and all special instructions issued by the FAA in the interest of national security. Those special instructions may be issued in any manner the FAA considers appropriate, including a NOTAM. Additionally, a pilot must comply with all of the applicable requirements of this chapter.
§ 91.19 Carriage of narcotic drugs, marihuana, and depressant or stimulant drugs or substances. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may operate a civil aircraft within the United States with knowledge that narcotic drugs, marihuana, and depressant or stimulant drugs or substances as defined in Federal or State statutes are carried in the aircraft.
( b ) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to any carriage of narcotic drugs, marihuana, and depressant or stimulant drugs or substances authorized by or under any Federal or State statute or by any Federal or State agency.
#### OTWELL v. THE STATE.

(Decided July 19, 1915.)

Appeal from Walker Law and Equity Court.

Heard before Hon. T. L. Sowell.

L. D. Gray, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Attorney General, for the State.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed on motion of appellant.
TRANSFER
      TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL CORP.




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Annual Report of Transfer Technology International Corp.
      (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), I, Rafael L. Marte, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)


The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)


The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/  RAFAEL
                L. MARTE
              Rafael
                L. Marte
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              Chief
                Accounting Officer
              April
                14, 2008




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1471.870 When do I know if the debarring official debars me? ( a ) The debarring official must make a written decision whether to debar within 45 days of closing the official record. The official record closes upon the debarring official's receipt of final submissions, information and findings of fact, if any. The debarring official may extend that period for good cause.
( b ) The debarring official sends you written notice, pursuant to § 1471.615 that the official decided, either— ( 1 ) Not to debar you; or
( 2 ) To debar you. In this event, the notice: ( i ) Refers to the Notice of Proposed Debarment;
( ii ) Specifies the reasons for your debarment;
( iii ) States the period of your debarment, including the effective dates; and
( iv ) Advises you that your debarment is effective for covered transactions and contracts that are subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1), throughout the executive branch of the Federal Government unless an agency head or an authorized designee grants an exception.
128 STAT. 1424 PUBLIC LAW 113–127—JULY 16, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2388: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113–95 (Comm. on Natural Resources). 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 113–97 (Comm. on Indian Affairs). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 159 (2013): Dec. 3, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 160 (2014): June 26, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–127 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To take certain Federal lands located in El Dorado County, California, into trust 

for the benefit of the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LAND INTO TRUST FOR THE SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND OF 

MIWOK INDIANS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The land described in subsection (b) is hereby 

taken into trust for the benefit of the Shingle Springs Band of 

Miwok Indians, subject to valid existing rights and management 

agreements related to easements and rights-of-way. 

(b) LAND DESCRIPTION.—The land taken into trust pursuant 

to subsection (a) is the approximately 40.852 acres of Federal land 

under the administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land 

Management identified as ‘‘Conveyance boundary’’ on the map titled 

‘‘Shingle Springs Land Conveyance/Draft’’ and dated June 7, 2012, 

including improvements and appurtenances thereto. 

(c) GAMING.—Class II and class III gaming under the Indian 

Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) shall not be permitted at any time on the land taken into trust pursuant to subsection (a). 

Approved July 16, 2014. 

July 16, 2014 

[H.R. 2388] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
#### § 415.51 General.

The FAA reviews a payload proposed for launch to determine whether a license applicant or payload owner or operator has obtained all required licenses, authorization, and permits, unless the payload is exempt from review under § 415.53 of this subpart. If not otherwise exempt, the FAA reviews a payload proposed for launch to determine whether its launch would jeopardize public health and safety, safety of property, U.S. national security or foreign policy interests, or international obligations of the United States. A payload determination is part of the licensing record on which the FAA's licensing determination is based. The safety requirements of subpart C and F of this part and of part 417 of this chapter apply to all payloads, whether or not the payload is otherwise exempt.

[Amdt. 415-03, 64 FR 19616, Apr. 21, 1999, as amended by Amdt. 415-4, 71 FR 50531, Aug. 25, 2006]
§ 73.5 Bearings; radials; miles. ( a ) All bearings and radials in this part are true from point of origin.
( b ) Unless otherwise specified, all mileages in this part are stated as statute miles.
§ 14.3 DOL Classification Review Committee. A DOL Classification Review Committee is hereby established. ( a ) Composition of committee. The members of this Committee are: Chairperson—Deputy Assistant Secretary for Security and Emergency Management, OASAM. Member—Administrative Officer, Office of the Solicitor. Member—Director, Office of Foreign Relations, Bureau of International Labor Affairs. Advisor—DOL Document Security Officer.
( b ) *Responsibilities.* The Committee is responsible for: ( 1 ) Acting on all suggestions and complaints arising with respect to the DOL's information security program.
( 2 ) Reviewing all requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, when a proposed denial is based on classification under Executive Order 12356 to determine if such classification is current.
( 3 ) Recommending to the Secretary of Labor appropriate administrative actions to correct abuses or violations of any provision of Executive Order 12356 or directives thereunder. Recommended administrative actions may include notification by warning letter, formal reprimand, and, to the extent permitted by law, suspension without pay and removal. Upon receipt of any such recommendation, the Secretary shall immediately advise the Committee of the action taken.
[50 FR 51391, Dec. 17, 1985, as amended at 72 FR 37098, July 9, 2007]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



I, Mark F. Travis, the Chief Executive Officer of Intrepid Capital Corporation
(the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

         1.       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A Amendment No. 1 of the
                  Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Periodic
                  Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d)
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 27, 2003
                              By:              /s/ Mark F. Travis
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Mark F. Travis, Chief Executive Officer


                                       24
#### § 1205.2 Employees' Bill of Rights.

The provisions of the third, fourth, and fifth paragraphs of section 2 are by law made a part of the contract of employment between the carrier and each employee and shall be binding upon the parties regardless of any other express or implied agreements between them. Under these provisions the employees are guaranteed the right to organize without interference of management, the right to determine who shall represent them, and the right to bargain collectively through such representatives. This section makes it unlawful for any carrier to require any person seeking employment to sign any contract promising to join or not to join a labor organization. Violation of the foregoing provisions is a misdemeanor under the law and subjects the offender to punishment.
June 25, 2015

MEMORANDUM

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meeting

From: Martha Keating

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699

On June 18, 2015, representatives of EPA attended a meeting with representatives of NAM and

NERA. The meeting was held by videoconference. Attendees discussed the ozone National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards rulemaking. NERA provided meeting materials and are attached.

The following is a list of attendees and their affiliation:

Name Affiliation

Joel Visser Sidley Austin

Catherine Karen Sidley Austin

Greg Beutelser National Association of Manufacturers (NAM)

Ross Elsenbert NAM

Anne Smith NERA Economic Consulting

Sharon Cooperstein EPA/Office of Policy (OP)

Al McGartland EPA/OP

Elizabeth Kopits EPA/OP

Janet McCabe EPA Office of Air and Radiation

Steve Page EPA/Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

(OAQPS)

Mike Koerber EPA/OAQPS

Martha Keating EPA/OAQPS

Robin Langdon EPA/OAQPS

Karen Wesson EPA/OAQPS
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of NEON Systems, Inc, (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Louis R. Woodhill,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350,
as adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Louis R. Woodhill
---------------------

Louis R. Woodhill

Chief Executive Officer

February 12, 2003

                                       31
#### SANTOSUSSO v CITY OF CLEVELAND.

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist., Cuyahoga Co

No. 9419.

Decided Nov. 19, 1928

A L Kriesberg, Cleveland, for Santosusso

C F Shuler, Cleveland; for City of Cleveland;

SULLIVAN, PJ.

The error urged is that the court should have compelled the prosecution to elect upon which offense it would go to trial. This was not done and inasmuch as two separate and independent offenses are involved it is clear that the demand for such an election ought to have been sustained and that there ought to have been two affidavits and two trials, or else but one trial and only as to one offense. The offenses necessarily grow out of one and the same transaction and it appears like a double assessment of a criminal penalty to sentence the plaintiff in error as was done for both offenses under one affidavit and one trial.

We think there was prejudicial error in this respect but it is our judgment that this court has the power to correct the same and we. hereby do so by reversing the judgment below as to careless driving and .affirming the judgment and. sentence below as to the offense of driving while intoxicated, and entries will be made accordingly.

Vickery and Levine JJ, concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Biotherapeutics,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Security and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jim D. Johnston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.



                                                         /s/ Jim D. Johnston
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Jim D. Johnston
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                         August 14, 2002
#### § 93.323 [Reserved
###### Editorial Note on Part 399

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 399 appear at 84 FR 15947, Apr. 16, 2019.

#### § 399.87 Baggage allowances and fees.

For passengers whose ultimate ticketed origin or destination is a U.S. point, U.S. and foreign carriers must apply the baggage allowances and fees that apply at the beginning of a passenger's itinerary throughout his or her entire itinerary. In the case of code-share flights that form part of an itinerary whose ultimate ticketed origin or destination is a U.S. point, U.S. and foreign carriers must apply the baggage allowances and fees of the marketing carrier throughout the itinerary to the extent that they differ from those of any operating carrier.

[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2010-0140, 76 FR 23167, Apr. 25, 2011]
#### § 100.601 Purpose and scope.

This part prescribes standards and procedures for officers and employees of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) who are responsible for the collection and disposition of certain debts owed to the United States, as further defined below. The authority for this part is the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966; the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996; 31 U.S.C. 3711 and 3716 through 3719, as amended; The Federal Claims Collection Standards, 31 CFR chapter IX parts 900-904; and Office of Management and Budget Circular A-129. The activities covered include: the collection of claims of any amount; compromising claims; suspending or terminating the collection of claims; referring debts that are more than 180 days delinquent to the Department of the Treasury for collection action; and the referral of debts of more than $100,000 (exclusive of any interest and charges) to the Department of Justice for litigation.
Editorial Note on Part 221
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 221 appear at 84 FR 15929, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 221.150 Method of giving power of attorney. ( a ) *Prescribed form of power of attorney.* A power of attorney prepared in accordance with a form acceptable to the Office of International Aviation shall be used by a carrier to give authority to an agent and (in the case of the agent being an individual) such agent's alternate to issue and file with the Department tariffs which contain local or joint fares or charges, including provisions governing such fares or charges, applicable via and for account of such carrier. Agents may be only natural persons or corporations (other than incorporated associations of air carriers). The authority conferred in a power of attorney may not be delegated to any other person.
( b ) *Designation of tariff issuing person by corporate agent.* When a corporation has been appointed as agent it shall forward to the Department a certified excerpt of the minutes of the meeting of its Board of Directors designating by name and title the person responsible for issuing tariffs and filing them with the Department. Only one such person may be designated by a corporate agent, and the title of such designee shall not contain the word “Agent”. When such a designee is replaced the Department shall be immediately notified in like manner of his successor. An officer or employee of an incorporated tariff-publishing agent may not be authorized to act as tariff agent in his/her individual capacity. Every tariff issued by a corporate agent shall be issued in its name as agent.
( c ) *Number of copies.* Each power of attorney shall be prepared in triplicate. The original of each power of attorney shall be filed with the Department, the duplicate thereof shall be given to the agent in whose favor the power of attorney is issued, and the third copy shall be retained by the carrier who issued the power of attorney.
( d ) *Conflicting authority prohibited.* In giving powers of attorney, carriers shall not give authority to two or more agents which, if used, would result in conflicting or duplicate tariff provisions.
#### § 103.100 Offers of reinstatement to employees in Armed Forces.

When an employer is required by a Board remedial order to offer an employee employment, reemployment, or reinstatement, or to notify an employee of his or her entitlement to reinstatement upon application, the employer shall, if the employee is serving in the Armed Forces of the United States at the time such offer or notification is made, also notify the employee of his or her right to reinstatement upon application in accordance with the Military Selective Service Act of 1967, as amended, after discharge from the Armed Forces.

[37 FR 21939, Oct. 17, 1972, as amended at 38 FR 9506, Apr. 17, 1973]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of NetMeasure Technology Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter Laipnieks, President and acting CFO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: May 21, 2004

By:   /s/ Peter Laipnieks

Name: Peter Laipnieks

Title:    President and Acting CFO