alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 2, 2016

.

________________

No. 3D15-1518

Lower Tribunal No. 11-38239

________________



### Ibeth Y. Prieto and George Prieto

,

Appellants,

vs.



### Federal National Mortgage Association,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Monica Gordo

, Judge.

Robert Flavell

, for appellants.

Choice Legal Group, P.A., and Wm. David Newman, Jr. (Fort Lauderdale),

for appellee.

Before SALTER, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

LOGUE, J.In this foreclosure case, the borrowers appeal the post-judgment order

denying their motion to vacate the foreclosure sale. The property was sold to the

lender while the borrowers’ timely motion for rehearing of the judgment was

pending. Based on the lender’s commendable confession of error, we agree that the

foreclosure sale must be set aside. See Wollman v. Levy

, 489 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 3d

DCA 1986) (“Once a timely motion for rehearing is made, the operation of the

judgment is suspended until the motion is disposed of. [The borrowers] timely

moved for a rehearing; therefore, the sale of the property should not have been

carried out until the motion had been acted upon.”) (internal citations omitted);

Hoffman v. Bank United, N.A.

, 137 So. 3d 1039 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (“[W]e agree

that the foreclosure sale of the property must be set aside because the sale was

conducted while [the borrower’s] timely motion for rehearing was pending.”).

Reversed and remanded.

2
[Crim. No. 521.

Second Appellate District.

November 11, 1916.]

#### In re FRED ISCH on Habeas Corpus.

County Ordinance—Penalty.—Writ of *habeas corpus*discharged on the authority of *People*v. *Pages, ante,*p. 37.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

The facts are similar to those stated in *People*v. Pages, *ante,*p. 37.

Frank T. Bates, for Petitioner.

T. W. Duckworth, District Attorney, and John L. Campbell, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

Upon the authority of the decision in *People*v. *Jean Fages,*Crim. No. 504, *ante,*p. 37, and in *In re E. R. Waite,*Crim. No. 520, *ante,*p. 801, this day decided, it is ordered that the writ be and it is discharged and the petitioner remanded to the custody of the sheriff of San Bernardino County.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT DARREN EUGENE SHER M AN-B EY, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. M ATTHEW

L. C ATE, Se c re ta

ry of the C a l ifornia De pa rtm e nt of C orre c tion & R e h a bilita tion, offic ia l c a

pa c ity ; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-55337 D.C . No. 2:12-c v-09281-R GK-R Z M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia R . Ga ry Kla usne r, Distric t

Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 18, 2014 * * B e fore : ALAR C ÓN, O’ SC ANNLAIN, a nd FER N ANDEZ, C irc uit Judge s. C a lifornia sta te prisone r Darre n Euge ne She rm an-B e y a p pe a ls pro se from the d istric t c o urt’ s judgm e nt dismissing his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging de libe rat e indiffe re nc e to his serious m e dic a l ne e ds. W e hav e jurisdic tion under 28 

# FIL ED MAR 4 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).U.S.C . § 1291. W e re v ie w de n ovo a dismissa l unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1915(e ), Barre n v . Harrington , 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th C ir. 1998) (orde r), a n d we a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly dism isse d She rm an-B e y ’ s a c t ion be c a use She rm an-B e y

fa ile d to a l le ge fa c ts suffic ie nt to show tha t de fe nda nts c o nsc i ously disre ga rde d a se rious risk to his he a lth whe n de la y e d re ne wa l of a

n e x e m ption from prison policy

a llowing him

to c ontinuec a

rry ing his pre s c ription pain m e dic ine on his pe rson. Se eFarme r v . Bre nnan , 511 U.S. 825, 845, 847 (1994) (a prison offic ia l a c ts with de libe rate indiffe re nc e by fa iling to ta

ke re a sona

ble m e a sure s to a

bate a substa ntia l risk of se rious ha

rm to a n inm ate ’ s he a lth); Toguc hi v . C hung , 391 F.3d 1051, 1060 (9th C ir. 2004) (e xpla i ning tha t “ [d] e libe rate indiffe re nc e is a

high le ga l sta

n da rd,” and tha

t m e dic a l m a lpra c tic e or gross ne glige nc e is insuffic ie nt to e sta blish de libe rate indiffe re nc e to se rious m e dic a l ne e ds). AFFIRM E D.

1 2 - 1 6 8 0 5 2
EXHIBIT 99.4 KPMG	LLP 600	de	Maisonneuve	Blvd.	West Suite	1500,	Tour	KPMG Montréal,	(Québec)		H3A	0A3 Canada Telephone						(514)	840-2100 Fax																	(514)	840-2187 Internet										www.kpmg.ca	 Consent	of	Independent	Registered	Public	Accounting	Firm To	the	Board	of	Directors	of	Gildan	Activewear	Inc.	 We	consent	to	the	use	of: • our	report	dated	February	22,	2022	on	the	consolidated	financial	statements	of	Gildan  Activewear	Inc.	(the	“Entity”)		which	comprise	the	consolidated	statements	of	financial	position  as	of	January	2,	2022	and	January	3,	2021,	the	related	consolidated	statements	of	earnings	and  comprehensive	income,	changes	in	equity	and	cash	flows	for	the	years	ended	January	2,	2022  and	January	3,	2021,	and	the	related	notes,	and • our	report	dated	February	22,	2022	on	the	effectiveness	of	the	Entity’s	internal	control	over  financial	reporting	as	of	January	2,	2022. each	of	which	is	included	in	the	Annual	Report	on	Form	40-F	of	the	Entity	for	the	fiscal	year	ended	 January	2,	2022. We	also	consent	to	the	incorporation	by	reference	of	such	reports	in	the	Registration	Statement	(No.	 333-333-208022)	on	Form	S-8	of	the	Entity. Montréal,	Canada February	24,	2022
§ 49.45 Recording of releases, cancellations, discharges, and satisfactions: special requirements. ( a ) A release, cancellation, discharge, or satisfaction of an encumbrance created by an instrument recorded under this subpart must be in a form equivalent to AC Form 8050-41 and contain a description of the encumbrance, the recording information furnished to the holder at the time of recording, and the collateral released.
( b ) If more than one engine or propeller, or both, are listed in an instrument, recorded under this subpart, that created an encumbrance thereon and all of them are released, they need not be listed by serial number, but the release, cancellation, discharge, or satisfaction must state that all of the encumbered engines or propellers are released. The original recorded document must be clearly identified by the names of the parties, the date of FAA recording, and the document date.
[Doc. No. 1996, 29 FR 6486, May 19, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 49-7, 37 FR 25487, Dec. 1, 1972]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. DENNIS JOHN VELEZ, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 947 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 29th day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-6600-7] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Notice; announcement meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the Sixth Meeting of the Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force. The purpose of this Task Force consisting of Federal, State, and Tribal members, is to lead efforts to coordinate and support nutrient management and hypoxia-related activities in the Mississippi River and Gulf of Mexico watersheds. The major matter to be discussed at the meeting is what should be included in a draft Action Plan which will be available for public comment. This plan of action is required by section 604(b) of the Harmful Algal Blooms and Hypoxia Research Control Act ( Public Law 105-383—Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1998). The public will be afforded an opportunity to provide input to the Task Force during open discussion periods. The room accommodates approximately 125 people. Those who plan to make a statement are asked to indicate their intention to Dr. Belefski (Contact Information below). 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held at 1 p.m.-5 p.m., June 15, 2000, and 8 a.m.—12 p.m., June 16, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the St. Louis Marriott Pavilion Downtown Hotel, One Broadway, St. Louis, MO; (314) 421-1776 or 1(800) 228-9290. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Mary Belefski, U.S. EPA, Assessment and Watershed Protection Division (AWPD), Mail Code 4503F, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20460, telephone (202)-260-7061; Internet: belefski.mary@epa.gov. For additional information on hotel accommodations contact Marquietta Davis, Tetra Tech, Inc., 10306 Eaton Place, Suite 340, Fairfax, Virginia 22030, telephone: (703) 385-6000; Internet:davisma@tetratech-ffx.com. 

Dated: May 2, 2000.

Robert Wayland, 

Director, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds.

[FR Doc. 00-11429 Filed 5-5-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6066

PENNELL NORMAN FOUST, Petitioner - Appellant, versus J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-3499-AW) Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 18, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pennell Norman Foust, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Pennell Foust appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Foust v. Stouffer , No. CA-00-3499-AW (D. Md. filed Dec. 4, 2000; entered Dec. 6, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection  with the Quarterly
 Report on Form 10-Q of Capital Bank  Corporation  (the  Company) for the period ended
September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report),  I, B. Grant Yarber,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that: (1)
The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ B. Grant Yarber

B. Grant Yarber
President and Chief Executive Officer
October 28, 2004 This Certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  § 1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed
 filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended,  and shall not be  incorporated  by reference  into any filing of the
Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities  Exchange Act of
1934, as amended,  whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of
any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed  original of this written
 statement  required by Section 906 has been  provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request. -36-
§ 417.213 Flight safety limits analysis. ( a ) *General.* A flight safety analysis must identify the location of populated or other protected areas, and establish flight safety limits that define when a flight safety system must terminate a launch vehicle's flight to prevent the hazardous effects of the resulting debris impacts from reaching any populated or other protected area and ensure that the launch satisfies the public risk criteria of § 417.107(b).
( b ) *Flight safety limits.* The analysis must establish flight safety limits for use in establishing flight termination rules. Section 417.113(c) contains requirements for flight termination rules. The flight safety limits must account for all temporal and geometric extents on the Earth's surface of a launch vehicle's hazardous debris impact dispersion resulting from any planned or unplanned event for all times during flight. Flight safety limits must account for all potential contributions to the debris impact dispersions, including at a minimum: ( 1 ) All time delays, as established by the time delay analysis of § 417.221;
( 2 ) Residual thrust remaining after flight termination implementation or vehicle breakup due to aerodynamic and inertial loads;
( 3 ) All wind effects;
( 4 ) Velocity imparted to vehicle fragments by breakup;
( 5 ) All lift and drag forces on the malfunctioning vehicle and falling debris;
( 6 ) All launch vehicle guidance and performance errors;
( 7 ) All launch vehicle malfunction turn capabilities; and
( 8 ) Any uncertainty due to map errors and launch vehicle tracking errors.
( c ) *Gates.* If a launch involves flight over any populated or other protected area, the flight safety analysis must establish a gate as required by §§ 417.217 and 417.218.
( d ) *Designated debris impact limits.* The analysis must establish designated impact limit lines to bound the area where debris with a ballistic coefficient of three or more is allowed to impact if the flight safety system functions properly.
600

700

800

550

800

700

800

700

750

650

800

700

800

600

700

850

700

800

750

750

800

800

F M 6 4 9

L A

P IT A

R A N C H R D

V E L A P E N A R A N C H R D

F M 3 0 7 3

C A S A B L A N C A R A N C H R D

E L PA IS A N O L N F M 6 4 9

F M 6 4 9

P E Y O T E R A N C H R D

A A M A R T IN E Z R D

F M 6 4 9 F M 6 4 9

L A

P IT A

R A N C H R D

V E L A P E N A R A N C H R D

F M 3 0 7 3

C A S A B L A N C A R A N C H R D

E L PA IS A N O L N F M 6 4 9

F M 6 4 9

P E Y O T E R A N C H R D

A A M A R T IN E Z R D

F M 6 4 9

Arroyo Grande

Los Tanques Creek

Arroyo

Grande

Arroyo Grande

Arro

y

o

Grande

Arroyo Grande

Arroyo

Gra

n

de

Thompsonville

Agua Azul

Creek East

Escobas

Armstrong

Ranch

San

Pablo

Ranch

Albercas Bruni SE Ranch

Thompsonville

Randado

Chargos

Creek

00' 55' 98°52'30"

30"

98°52'

30"

15'

30"

27°

27°07'

99°

27°

30"

99°

15'

07'

30"

00'

27°

57'

57' 55'

10'

12'30" 12'30"

10'

E 000m

30

30

5 5

30

5

30

5

30

30

5

30

5

30

5 5

30

30

30

5

30

5

30

30

30

30

5

30

5

30

30

5

5

000m

5 5

000m

30

30

30

5

5

30

5

000m

30

5

30

30

5 5 08

14

05

04

05

07

01

06

07 12

08

06

08 12

03

05

04

11

13

01

09

05

10

E 06 07 09

11

06

07

10

10

14

03

01 N

10

09

N

12

03

03 11

02

12

02

02

13

01

08

09

860 000

970 000

16

FEET

000

000

FEET

16

FEET

830

940

FEET

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 2798-223

THOMPSONVILLE, TX

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

THOMPSONVILLE QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14R

Imagery......................................................NAIP, April 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2008

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2004

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 2 ́

1 MILS

5° 23 ́

96 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14R

NR

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
EXHIBIT 32





SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certify that this Form 10-QSB of Next, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Next, Inc.







Date:  March 31, 2005

By:/s/  William B. Hensley III

William B. Hensley III

Chief Executive Officer





Date:  March 31, 2005

By:/s/  Charles L. Thompson

Charles L. Thompson

Chief Financial Officer

Chief Accounting Officer
ATTACHMENT B

EMAIL NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING ON

THE ST ATE IMPEMENTATION PLAN REVISION FOR

FEDERAL NITROGEN DIOXIDE STANDARD INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS

What's New List Serve Post Display

B ELOW IS THE L IST S ERVE P OST YOU SELECTED TO DISPLAY

. ARBCOMBO

-- N OTICE OF P UBLIC M EETING FOR N OVEMBER 15, 2012

Posted: 15 Oct 2012 14:31:36

The Air Resources Board will conduct a public meeting to consider approval of the Proposed State Implementation Plan Revision for Federal Nitrogen Dioxide Standard

In frastructure Requirements.

Interested members of the public may present comments orally or in writing at the meeting and comments may be submitted by postal mail or by electronic submittal before the meeting. To be considered by the Board, written comments not physically submitted at the meeting must be received no later than 12:00 noon, November 14,
2012, and addressed to the following:

Postal mail: Clerk of the Board, Air Resources Board 1001 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814

Electronic su bmittal: http://www.arb.ca.gov/lispub/comm/bclist.php

Copies of the proposed NO2 Infrastructure SIP will be available at ARB’s Public Information Office,1001 I Street, First Floor, Environmental Services Center, Sacramento, California, 95814, (916) 322 2990 beginning October 15, 2012. The document may also be accessed on ARB’s website at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/sip.htm.

Further inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to Ms. Gayle Sweigert, Manager, Air Quality Analysis Section, at (916) 322

- 6923 or Ms. Marcella Nystrom, Staff Air Pollution Specialist, at (916) 323

- 8543.

Thank you

You are receiving this single arbcombo email because you are a subscriber to or have made a public comment to one or more of the following lists: boar d, desig, sip.
#### §§ 701.15-701.18 [Reserved]
§ 5.13 Requirements for type certificate holders or licensees applying for a production certificate for the same product. ( a ) This section applies to any holder or licensee of a type certificate for a product who either: ( 1 ) Applies for a production certificate for that same product under part 21 of this chapter on or after May 28, 2024, or
( 2 ) Has an application for a production certificate for that same product under part 21 of this chapter pending on May 28, 2024.
( b ) Any person that meets paragraph (a) of this section must: ( 1 ) Develop and maintain an organizational system description in accordance with § 5.17 of this subpart.
( 2 ) Submit an implementation plan in accordance with § 5.19 of this subpart for FAA approval in a form and manner acceptable to the Administrator during the certification process.
( 3 ) Develop an SMS that meets the requirements of this part.
( 4 ) Implement the SMS in accordance with this part no later than 36 months after submission of the implementation plan.
( 5 ) Make available to the Administrator, upon request, all necessary information and data that demonstrates that the person has an SMS that meets the requirements set forth in this part.
( 6 ) Maintain the SMS as long as the person is both a holder of a production certificate and a holder or licensee of a type certificate for the same product.
#### § 450.13 Rights not conferred by a vehicle operator license.

Issuance of a vehicle operator license does not relieve a licensee of its obligation to comply with all applicable requirements of law or regulation that may apply to its activities, nor does issuance confer any proprietary, property, or exclusive right in the use of any Federal launch or reentry site or related facilities, airspace, or outer space.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Open-File Report 2013-1020

Pubs Warehouse

High-Resolution Geophysical Data Collected Aboard the U.S. Geological Survey Research Vessel *Rafael* to Supplement Existing Datasets From Buzzards Bay and Vineyard Sound, Massachusetts

----

## Acknowledgments

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |            U.S. Geological Survey                                                URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2013/1020/html/ofr2013-1020_ack.html            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact                        Page Last Modified: Wednesday, March 12, 2014, 05:15:07 PM