alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4460 

To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to waive certain eligibility 

requirements for a veteran to receive per diem payments for domiciliary 

care at a State home, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 5, 2020 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. KING, and Mr. SULLIVAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to waive 

certain eligibility requirements for a veteran to receive 

per diem payments for domiciliary care at a State home, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Veterans Homes 

5 Domiciliary Care Flexibility Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4460 IS

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF REQUIREMENTS OF DEPARTMENT OF 

2 VETERANS AFFAIRS FOR RECEIPT OF PER 

3 DIEM PAYMENTS FOR DOMICILIARY CARE AT 

4 STATE HOMES AND MODIFICATION OF ELIGI5 BILITY FOR SUCH PAYMENTS. 

6 (a) WAIVER OF REQUIREMENTS.—Notwithstanding 

7 section 1741 of title 38, United States Code (as amended 

8 by subsection (b)), the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 

9 modify section 51.51(b) of title 38, Code of Federal Regu10 lations (or successor regulations), to provide the Secretary 

11 the authority to waive the requirements under such section 

12 51.51(b) for a veteran to be eligible for per diem payments 

13 for domiciliary care at a State home if— 

14 (1) the veteran has met not fewer than four of 

15 the requirements set forth in such section; or 

16 (2) such waiver would be in the best interest of 

17 the veteran. 

18 (b) MODIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY.—Section 

19 1741(a)(1) of title 38, United States Code, is amended, 

20 in the flush text following subparagraph (B), by striking 

21 ‘‘in a Department facility’’ and inserting ‘‘under the laws 

22 administered by the Secretary’’. 

23 (c) STATE HOME DEFINED.—In this section, the 

24 term ‘‘State home’’ has the meaning given that term in 

25 section 101(19) of title 38, United States Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Augus t 27 , 201 0

Honorabl e RayLaHoo d ^ ^'S o Secretar yof th e U.S . Departmen t of Transportatio n ^ o§- n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAve . S E ^ cyWashingto n D.C . '" ^ Dea rSecretar

yLaHood ; Thi s lette ri s sen t t o yo u i n support o f th e proposa l an d applicatio n o f Ventur a County/Oxnar d Airport t o th e Departmen t o f Transportatio n fo ra gran t unde rth e Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Progra m Ventur a County/Oxnar d Airport ha s requeste d tha t Horizo n Ai rconside rai rservic e betwee n Oxnar d Airport an d Sa n Jos e Internationa l Airport . Sinc e Horizo n Ai rdoe s no t serv e Oxnard Airport , thi s wil l b e a risk yventure . T o offse t thi s risk , w e support th e developmen t o f a stron g incentiv e packag e byVentur a County/Oxnar d Airport tha t wil l includ e a revenu e guarantee , loca l advertisin g an d marketing , airpor t fe e waivers , an d a pre-purchase d ticke t progra m b yloca l businesses . Ne wai rservic e i n th e Oxnard-Sa n Jos e marke t wil l no t onl ydepen d o n a stron g incentiv e packag e an d goo d passenge rrespons e bu t i t wil l als o depen d o n th e financia l healt h o f th e airline , th e availabilit yo f aircraf t t o fl yth e ne wroute , an d th e competitiv e situatio n i n th e marke t an d othe rfactor s beyon d ou rcontrol . Horizo n Ai rha s man yrequest s fro m communitie s an d airport s fo rne w ai rservic e an d eve n thoug h th e passenge rdeman d forecas t fo rOxnar d Airport meet s ou rrequirements , w e wil l no t giv e Oxnar d Airport a hig h priorit yI n ou rexpansio n progra m withou t a stron g incentiv e progra m simila rt o th e curren t reques t o f Ventur a County/Oxnar d Airport . Th e awar d o f thi s gran t reques t wil l hel p reduc e th e ris k an d influenc e ou rdecisio n regardin g servic e i n th e Oxnard-Sa n Jos e market . Horizo n Ai rlooks forwar d t o workin g wit h th e U.S . Departmen t o f Transportatio n an d th e Ventur a County/Oxnar d Airport o n thi s ai rservic e initiative . Pleas e contac t m e i f yo u hav e an y question s concernin g thi s lette ro f suppor t an d an yspecific s abou t Horizo n Air . Sincerel yyours , DanRuss o Vic e Presiden t of Marketin g an d Communication s

||,,ii,..., , \r . - l' ( J 'i.. - f.;;'! ' • ><;,,(! . . \ \\";-i !
§ 61.309 What aeronautical knowledge must I have to apply for a sport pilot certificate? To apply for a sport pilot certificate you must receive and log ground training from an authorized instructor or complete a home-study course on the following aeronautical knowledge areas: ( a ) Applicable regulations of this chapter that relate to sport pilot privileges, limits, and flight operations.
( b ) Accident reporting requirements of the National Transportation Safety Board.
( c ) Use of the applicable portions of the aeronautical information manual and FAA advisory circulars.
( d ) Use of aeronautical charts for VFR navigation using pilotage, dead reckoning, and navigation systems, as appropriate.
( e ) Recognition of critical weather situations from the ground and in flight, windshear avoidance, and the procurement and use of aeronautical weather reports and forecasts.
( f ) Safe and efficient operation of aircraft, including collision avoidance, and recognition and avoidance of wake turbulence.
( g ) Effects of density altitude on takeoff and climb performance.
( h ) Weight and balance computations.
( i ) Principles of aerodynamics, powerplants, and aircraft systems.
( j ) Stall awareness, spin entry, spins, and spin recovery techniques, as applicable.
( k ) Aeronautical decision making and risk management.
( l ) Preflight actions that include— ( 1 ) How to get information on runway lengths at airports of intended use, data on takeoff and landing distances, weather reports and forecasts, and fuel requirements; and
( 2 ) How to plan for alternatives if the planned flight cannot be completed or if you encounter delays.
[Doc. No. FAA-2001-11133, 69 FR 44869, July 27, 2004, as amended by Amdt. 61-125, 75 FR 5221, Feb. 1, 2010]
§ 27.1123 Exhaust piping. ( a ) Exhaust piping must be heat and corrosion resistant, and must have provisions to prevent failure due to expansion by operating temperatures.
( b ) Exhaust piping must be supported to withstand any vibration and inertia loads to which it would be subjected in operations.
( c ) Exhaust piping connected to components between which relative motion could exist must have provisions for flexibility.
[Amdt. 27-11, 41 FR 55470, Dec. 20, 1976]
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Ivar S. Chhina,President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, of InterDent ServiceCorporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006 which thiscertification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2) information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|       | /s/ IVAR  S.  CHHINA                         |   |
|------------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|       | Ivar S. Chhina                                    |
| ** ** | **President,**Chief Executive Officer andChairman |
| ** ** | **May 12, 2006**                                  |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11685]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts; Combined Arts Advisory Panel


 

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Combined Arts Advisory Panel, Opera section (Creativity, & 
Organizational Capacity categories), to the National Council on the 
Arts will be held from June 26-27, 2000 in Room 716 at the Nancy Hanks 
Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C., 20506. A 
portion of this meeting, from 3:00 p.m. to 4:15 p.m. on June 27th, will 
be open to the public for policy discussion.
    The remaining portions of this meeting, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:45 p.m. 
on June 26th and from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. and 4:15 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. 
on June 27th, are for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, 
evaluation, and recommendation on applications for financial assistance 
under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 
1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the 
agency by grant applicants. In accordance with the determination of the 
Chairman of May 12, 1999, these sessions will be closed to the public 
pursuant to (c)(4)(6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United 
States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and, if time allows, may be 
permitted to participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion 
of the panel chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal 
employee in attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506, 202/682-5532, 
TDY-TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, 
National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C. 20506, or call 202/
682-5691.

    Dated: May 4, 2000.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 00-11685 Filed 5-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
# EUR-Lex - 31996D0624 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996D0624

**96/624/EC: Commission Decision of 17 October 1996 amending Council Decision 79/542/EEC drawing up a list of third countries from which the Member States authorize imports of bovine animals, swine, equidae, sheep and goats, fresh meat and meat products (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 279 , 31/10/1996 P. 0033 - 0038 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 17 October 1996 amending Council Decision 79/542/EEC drawing up a list of third countries from which the Member States authorize imports of bovine animals, swine, equidae, sheep and goats, fresh meat and meat products (Text with EEA relevance) (96/624/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine, ovine and caprine animals and swine, fresh meat or meat products from third countries (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 3 thereof,

Whereas Council Decision 79/542/EEC (2), as last amended by Commission Decision 96/605/EC (3), draws up a list of third countries from which Member States authorize imports of bovine animals, swine, equidae, sheep and goats, fresh meat and meat products;

Whereas the authorities of Argentina and Uruguay have provided the Commission with satisfactory information on the health situation and veterinary structures responsible for checking, in both of these countries, the meat of wild cloven-hoofed animals;

Whereas the authorities of the Czech Republic have provided the Commission with satisfactory information on the health situation and the veterinary structures responsible for the prevention of classical swine fever in wild boar;

Whereas Decision 79/542/EEC must be amended as a result;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 79/542/EEC is replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 October 1996.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28.

(2) OJ No L 146, 14. 6. 1979, p. 15.

(3) OJ No L 267, 19. 10. 1996, p. 29.

ANNEX

'ANNEX

This is a list in principle, imports shall fulfil the appropriate animal and public health requirements

PART 1

LIVE ANIMALS, FRESH MEAT AND MEAT PRODUCTS

>TABLE>

PART 2

SPECIAL COLUMN FOR REGISTERED HORSES

>TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Lena Rosawitz, Respondent, against Ficks Reed Company et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

(Argued November 17, 1936;

decided December 1, 1936.)

*William Warren Dimmick*for appellants.

*Jeremiah F. Connor*for claimant, respondent.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Leon Freedman*of counsel); for State Industrial Board, respondent,

*655Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
#### Capital Resources Corp., Respondent, v Anne M. Auguste, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[698 NYS2d 303]

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Anne Marie Auguste appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated November 6, 1998, which denied her motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale, and granted the plaintiffs cross motion to confirm the Referee’s report of sale.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We reject the appellant’s contention that the judgment of foreclosure-should have .been vacated based on improper service. Where a process server dies after service and prior to a hearing as to whether service'was properly effected, his affidavit of service may be received as prima facie evidence of service provided it is not conclusory and devoid of sufficient detail *(see,*CPLR 4531; *Gordon v Nemeroff Realty Corp.,*139 AD2d 492). In the instant case, the deceased process server’s affidavit of service was properly admitted, and that affidavit, as well as the plaintiffs additional testimony at the hearing, established jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence.

The testimony offered by the appellant at the hearing, which the hearing court found unconvincing, failed to rebut the plaintiffs case. Issues of credibility are primarily for the hearing court and its decision in this regard, made with the opportunity to observe the witnesses’ demeanor, should not be disturbed if supported by a fair preponderance of the evidence *(see, Gordon v Nemeroff Realty Corp., supra).*

The appellant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
# EUR-Lex - 31995D0098 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995D0098

**95/98/EC: Commission Decision of 13 March 1995 establishing the status of Sweden as non-vaccinating as regards Newcastle disease **

*
Official Journal L 075 , 04/04/1995 P. 0028 - 0028 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 13 March 1995 establishing the status of Sweden as non-vaccinating as regards Newcastle disease (Text with EEA relevance) (95/98/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/593/EEC of 15 October 1990 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in and imports from third countries of poultry and hatching eggs (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 12 (2) thereof,

Whereas vaccination against Newcastle disease in poultry has been prohibited for over a year in Sweden;

Whereas breeding flocks in Sweden have been monitored at least once a year for the presence of Newcastle disease; whereas the holdings contain no poultry which have been vaccinated against Newcastle disease;

Whereas in the light of the Newcastle disease situation it is appropriate to fix the status of Sweden;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Sweden fulfils the criteria fixed by Article 12 (2) of Directive 90/539/EEC.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 March 1995.

For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission
§ 437.69 Communications. ( a ) A permittee must be in communication with Air Traffic Control during all phases of flight.
( b ) A permittee must record communications affecting the safety of the flight.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 93 (Friday, May 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11942]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of amendment to approved Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act 
(IGRA), (Pub. L. 100-497), 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved 
Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming 
activities on Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, has 
approved the Amendment to the Tribal State Off-Track Wagering Compact 
between the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and the State of Oklahoma, which 
was executed on April 6, 2000.

DATES: This action is effective May 12, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Indian 
Gaming Management Staff, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, D.C. 
20240, (202) 219-4066.

    Dated: May 3, 2000.
Kevin Gover,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 00-11942 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 92 (Thursday, May 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11827]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-37, 511]


Avent Inc.; Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Tuscon, Arizona; Notice 
of Termination of Investment

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on March 27, 2000, in response to a worker petition which 
was filed by the company on behalf of workers at Avent Inc., a Division 
of Kimberly-Clark Corporation, located in Tucson, Arizona.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, 
and the investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC this 28th day of April, 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-11827 Filed 5-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit
      32.1

















**CERTIFICATION**








In
      connection with the periodic report of Asiamart, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Alex Yue, Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title
      18,
      Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
      knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.





Date: May
                16, 2007
              
              /s/ Alex
                YueAlex
                YueChief Executive Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Shamsher Medih Chisti wi*0** o£M^ 

## TDCJ-IDNo. 1490300 ^rx)0^°F^s James A. LynaughUnit ^vSuS*01*"



### 1098, SouthHwy 2037 t\1N& Fort Stockton, Tx 79735 

## To, c^f^ Christopher A. Prine Clerk of the Court First Court of Appeals 301 Fannin Street Houston, Tx 77002 Date: March 09, 2015



### Style: Shamsher Medih Chisti v. Sana Chisti aka Kiran Wilwerding Appellant Case Number: 01-13-00780-CV

Trial Court Case Number: 2013-12431 Trial Court 257th District Court of Harris County, Texas

Dear Clerk,Greetings. On February 10, 2015, my case was set for Sub mission in the above casenumber. TheAppellees/was^given 10 days to 

### file Supplemental Clerk Record onJanuary>29>i2015, Pursuant to Texas Rule ofAppellate Procedure Rule 34.5(c), about the special clerk's record onPlaintiff's Motion to Reinstate/Filing letter dated June 24, 2013. This notice was for 10days to file the special clerk's record. The Clerk of the trial Court file the Special Supplemental Clerk's Record onFebruary 20, 2015, delaying the process ofAppellant Court's Submission date of February 10, 2015. Now it has been more than 30 days,from the date of Submission, I 

### didn;t received any Court Order orMemorandum of Order for the Submis sions set for February 10, 2015. Can you please inform me about the Status of my case and there is any Court Order on my Appeal;. Thank you so much for your time and attention in this matter. eP*•



### ocj file Sh^)ji5^r^%dihChisti .lant Pro-SeChisti Shamsher #1490300

James A. Lyriaugh Unit 1098, South Hwy2037 Fort Stockton, Tx 79735

***Legal Mail*** To, IRC '.&'&'"<? -2i 'L*

Christopher A. Prine Clerk of the Court 

### First Court of Appeals 301 Fannin Street Houston, Tx 77002-2066

?70O25.2066 

### i{ii^)ii'i>-iii|i|..||.|i^tt'|i>ii'lH>1iiiH>iiilJP'iMbl>l
#### MUCCINO v B & O RR CO

Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist., Summit Co

No. 1703.

Decided October 29, 1929

Messrs. Frank & Ream, Akron, for Muccino.

Messrs. Waters, Andress, Hagelbarger, Wise & Maxon, Akron, for B & O RR Co.

Syllabus by

WASHBURN. J.

When, in a proceeding to fix the value of real estate taken for public purposes, evidence is offered, in cross-examination of the sale price of other land, its competency depends upon whether there was an actual sale sufficiently near in point of time, whether the.other land is similiar in character, location and other circumstances relating to value, and whether the sale was in a fair and open market, and should be determined by the trial judge in the exercise of a sound discretion; and such determination will not be disturbed by a reviewing court unless an abuse of discretion is shown.

Full opinion will be published later.