alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 389.26 Special rules for tariff page filings. ( a ) *Tariffs issued by carriers.* The filing fee for tariff pages filed by U.S. air carriers will be charged even if the tariff includes matters involving participating foreign air carriers. It will also be charged if the tariff is issued by a foreign air carrier and includes matters involving participating U.S. air carriers, unless the foreign air carrier has obtained a waiver under § 389.24. The fee will not be charged for a blank looseleaf page unless it cancels matter in the preceding issue of the page.
( b ) *Tariffs issued by publishing agents.* ( 1 ) If the tariff is issued for one or more air carriers exclusively, the fee will be charged for each page.
( 2 ) If the tariff is issued for one or more air carriers and one or more foreign air carriers, the fee will be charged for each page, except for those pages that the issuing agent states contain only: ( i ) Matters pertaining exclusively to foreign air carriers that have been granted a waiver; or
( ii ) Changes in matters pertaining to foreign air carriers that have been granted a waiver and that are included on the same page with other matters that are reissued without change.
( 3 ) The fee will not be charged for a blank looseleaf page unless it cancels matters in the preceding page.
( 4 ) No fee will be charged when two pages are published back-to-back, one page is not subject to the fee under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, and the page on the reverse is issued without substantive change.
( 5 ) The fee will be charged for two looseleaf pages containing a correction number check sheet unless all other pages of the tariff are exempt from the fee.
§ 101.28 Consent agreements providing for election. ( a ) The Board makes available to the parties three types of informal consent procedures through which authorization issues can be resolved without resort to formal procedures. These informal agreements are the consent election agreement with final regional director determinations of post-election disputes, the stipulated election agreement with discretionary Board review, and the full consent election agreement with final regional director determinations of pre- and post-election disputes. Forms for use in these informal procedures are available in the Regional Offices.
( b ) The procedures to be used in connection with a consent-election agreement with final regional director determinations of post-election disputes, a stipulated election agreement with discretionary Board review, and a full consent-election agreement with final regional director determinations of pre- and post-election disputes are the same as those described in subpart C of 29 CFR part 102 and the statement of the general course in connection with similar agreements in representation cases under Section 9(c) of the Act, except that no provision is made for runoff elections.
[79 FR 74477, Dec. 15, 2014]
§ 382.23 May carriers require a passenger with a disability to provide a medical certificate? ( a ) Except as provided in this section, you must not require a passenger with a disability to have a medical certificate as a condition for being provided transportation.
( b ) ( 1 ) You may require a medical certificate for a passenger with a disability— ( i ) Who is traveling in a stretcher or incubator;
( ii ) Who needs medical oxygen during a flight; or
( iii ) Whose medical condition is such that there is reasonable doubt that the individual can complete the flight safely, without requiring extraordinary medical assistance during the flight.
( 2 ) For purposes of this paragraph, a medical certificate is a written statement from the passenger's physician saying that the passenger is capable of completing the flight safely, without requiring extraordinary medical assistance during the flight.
( 3 ) To be valid, a medical certificate under this paragraph must be dated within 10 days of the scheduled date of the passenger's initial departing flight. Example to paragraph (b)(3): A passenger who schedules a flight from New York to London on January 15 with a return on April 15 would have to show a medical certificate dated January 5 or later. The passenger would not have to show a second medical certificate dated April 5 or later.
( c ) ( 1 ) You may also require a medical certificate for a passenger if he or she has a communicable disease or condition that could pose a direct threat to the health or safety of others on the flight.
( 2 ) For purposes of this paragraph, a medical certificate is a written statement from the passenger's physician saying that the disease or infection would not, under the present conditions in the particular passenger's case, be communicable to other persons during the normal course of a flight. The medical certificate must state any conditions or precautions that would have to be observed to prevent the transmission of the disease or infection to other persons in the normal course of a flight. A medical certificate under this paragraph must be dated within 10 days of the date of the flight for which it is presented.
( d ) As a carrier, you may require that a passenger with a medical certificate undergo additional medical review by you if there is a legitimate medical reason for believing that there has been a significant adverse change in the passenger's condition since the issuance of the medical certificate or that the certificate significantly understates the passenger's risk to the health of other persons on the flight. If the results of this medical review demonstrate that the passenger, notwithstanding the medical certificate, is likely to be unable to complete the flight without requiring extraordinary medical assistance (e.g., the passenger has apparent significant difficulty in breathing, appears to be in substantial pain, *etc.*) or would pose a direct threat to the health or safety of other persons on the flight, you may take an action otherwise prohibited under § 382.21(a) of this part.
[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2004-19482, 73 FR 27665, May 13, 2008, as amended at 75 FR 44887, July 30, 2010]
#### § 93.91 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes special air traffic rules for aircraft conducting VFR operations in the Los Angeles, California Special Flight Rules Area.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 462 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 462

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify authorities relating 
   to the collective bargaining of employees in the Veterans Health 
                Administration, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2019

   Mr. Brown (for himself, Ms. Warren, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Durbin, Mrs. 
Murray, and Mr. Sanders) introduced the following bill; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify authorities relating 
   to the collective bargaining of employees in the Veterans Health 
                Administration, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Department of Veterans Affairs 
Employee Fairness Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITIES ON COLLECTIVE BARGAINING OF 
              EMPLOYEES OF THE VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION.

    Section 7422 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking subsections (b), (c), and (d); and
            (2) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
EDWARD P. LUECK,

Petitioner

,

v. Case No. 5D17

- 1258

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent

. ________________________________/

Opinion filed June 30, 2017

Petition for Belated Appeal A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Edward P. Lueck, Blountstown, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General Tallahassee, and, Kaylee Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with

the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the May 24, 2016 judgments

and sentences in Case No. 2013

- CF

- 305 418 , in the Circuit Court in and for Volusia

County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

COHEN, C.J., BERGER, LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with this annual report of Ultrapetrol (Bahamas) Limited (the
     "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed
     with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
     "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
     certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

     This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
     1350, and not for any other purpose.

Dated:  May 1, 2004


/s/ Felipe Menendez Ross
--------------------------------
Felipe Menendez Ross

Director, Chief Executive
Officer, and President
§ 63.39 Skill requirements. ( a ) An applicant for a flight engineer certificate with a class rating must pass a practical test in the class of airplane for which a rating is sought. To pass the practical test for a flight engineer certificate, the applicant must satisfactorily demonstrate the objectives in the areas of operation specified in the Flight Engineer Practical Test Standards for Reciprocating Engine, Turbopropeller, and Turbojet Powered Aircraft (incorporated by reference, see paragraph (c) of this section). The test may only be given in an airplane specified in § 63.37(a).
( b ) The applicant must— ( 1 ) Show that the applicant can satisfactorily perform preflight inspection, servicing, starting, pretakeoff, and postlanding procedures;
( 2 ) In flight, show that the applicant can satisfactorily perform the normal duties and procedures relating to the airplane, airplane engines, propellers (if appropriate), systems, and appliances; and
( 3 ) In flight, in an airplane simulator, or in an approved flight engineer training device, show that the applicant can satisfactorily perform emergency duties and procedures and recognize and take appropriate action for malfunctions of the airplane, engines, propellers (if appropriate), systems and appliances.
( c ) FAA-S-8081-21A, Flight Engineer Practical Test Standards for Reciprocating Engine, Turbopropeller, and Turbojet Powered Aircraft, November 2023, is incorporated by reference into this section with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact FAA, Training and Certification Group, 202-267-1100, *ACSPTSinquiries@faa.gov , www.faa.gov/training_testing .* For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations* or email *fr.inspection@nara.gov .* The material may be obtained from FAA, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591, 866-835-5322, *www.faa.gov/training_testing .*
[Docket No. FAA-2022-1463; Amdt. No.63-46, 89 FR 22519, Apr. 1, 2024]
§ 27.307 Proof of structure. ( a ) Compliance with the strength and deformation requirements of this subpart must be shown for each critical loading condition accounting for the environment to which the structure will be exposed in operation. Structural analysis (static or fatigue) may be used only if the structure conforms to those structures for which experience has shown this method to be reliable. In other cases, substantiating load tests must be made.
( b ) Proof of compliance with the strength requirements of this subpart must include— ( 1 ) Dynamic and endurance tests of rotors, rotor drives, and rotor controls;
( 2 ) Limit load tests of the control system, including control surfaces;
( 3 ) Operation tests of the control system;
( 4 ) Flight stress measurement tests;
( 5 ) Landing gear drop tests; and
( 6 ) Any additional test required for new or unusual design features.
(Secs. 604, 605, 72 Stat. 778, 49 U.S.C. 1424, 1425)
[Doc. No. 5074, 29 FR 15695, Nov. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 27-3, 33 FR 14105, Sept. 18, 1968; Amdt. 27-26, 55 FR 7999, Mar. 6, 1990]
#### Abdullah KHOZOUIE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 18197.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 10, 1960.

James C. Abbott, McAllen, Tex., for appellant.

Brian S. Odem, Asst. U. S. Atty., Brownsville, Tex., William B. Butler, U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, CAMERON and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s sole basis for applying for a stay of deportation is 8 U.S.C.A. § 1253 (h):

> “(h) The Attorney General is authorized to withhold deportation of any alien within the United States to any country in which in his opinion the alien would be subject to physical persecution and for such period of time as he deems to be necessary for such reason.”

The trial court, on the habeas corpus hearing, held:

> “This Court has searched the record sympathetically hoping to be able to find some basis for the claim of physical persecution; but cannot find it. Nor can I find any evidence that the hearing before the Immigration Service was not fairly conducted or that Khozouie has been denied due process.”

We find no error. The judgment is affirmed. United States, ex rel. Nereo Dolenz v. Shaughnessy, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 107 F.Supp. 611, affirmed 2 Cir., 200 F.2d 288, certiorari denied 345 U.S. 928, 73 S.Ct. 780, 97 L.Ed. 1358.
§ 91.321 Carriage of candidates in elections. ( a ) As an aircraft operator, you may receive payment for carrying a candidate, agent of a candidate, or person traveling on behalf of a candidate, running for Federal, State, or local election, without having to comply with the rules in parts 121, 125 or 135 of this chapter, under the following conditions: ( 1 ) Your primary business is not as an air carrier or commercial operator;
( 2 ) You carry the candidate, agent, or person traveling on behalf of a candidate, under the rules of part 91; and
( 3 ) By Federal, state or local law, you are required to receive payment for carrying the candidate, agent, or person traveling on behalf of a candidate. For federal elections, the payment may not exceed the amount required by the Federal Election Commission. For a state or local election, the payment may not exceed the amount required under the applicable state or local law.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, for Federal elections, the terms *candidate* and *election* have the same meaning as set forth in the regulations of the Federal Election Commission. For State or local elections, the terms *candidate* and *election* have the same meaning as provided by the applicable State or local law and those terms relate to candidates for election to public office in State and local government elections.
[Doc. No. FAA-2005-20168, 70 FR 4982, Jan. 31, 2005]
§ 93.133 Exceptions. Except as provided in § 93.130, the provisions of §§ 93.123 and 93.125 do not apply to— ( a ) The Newark Airport, Newark, NJ;
( b ) The Kennedy International Airport, New York, NY, except during the hours from 3 p.m. through 7:59 p.m., local time; and
( c ) O'Hare International Airport from 9:15 p.m. to 6:44 a.m., local time.
[Doc. No. 24471, 49 FR 8244, Mar. 6, 1984]
### SERVE D MA Y 4 , 201 0 ,...„,,.....,..,„...,., , U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C ' i
IN TH EMATTERO F SCENI C AVIATION , INC
. FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP09NM001 1 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S No
. FAA-2009-097 4 

### HEARIN GNOTIC E Th e Procedura l Orde r

b e an di s hereb y amende da s follows , reflectin g achang e i n discovery : O n o r befor e Jul y 1 , 2010 , th e partie s shal l conclud e al l discovery including , but no t limite dto , depositions , documen t production , response s t o productio n request s and/o r interrogatories
. I f

th e partie s canno t

resolv e adiscovery disput e the y shal l submi t th e disput e t o th e undersigne dfo r resolutio n i n atimel y manner ; NOTIC EI S HEREB Y GIVE N tha t testimon y an devidenc e wil l b e hear dan dconsidere d o n Jul y 13,14,15 , an d16,2010 , at th e U.S
. Ta x Court , Courtroo m5223 , Wallac e F
. Bennet t Federa l Building , 12 5 S
. Stat e Street , Sal t Lak e City , U T 84138
. Hearing s wil l commenc e at

9:0 0 a.m . an dconclud e at 4:3 0 p.m . eac hday
. Th e partie s shoul d vacat e th e courthous e o n o r befor e 5:0 0 p.m . eac hday
.

U.S
. Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachment(s ) - Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No
. CP09NM01 1 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Gregor y S
. Winton , Respondent' s Counse l Aviatio n La w Experts , LL C 33 0 Aviatio n Way , Secon dFloo r Frederick , M D 2170 1 TEL : 301-294-855 0 FAX : 301-294-252 5 Scott R
. Morris , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l Northwes t

Mountai n Region , ANM- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 160 1 Lin dAvenue , S.W
. Renton , W A 9805 7 TEL : 425-227-200 7 FAX : 425-227-100 7 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s by U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Hearin g Docket , Federa

l Aviation Administration , 60 0 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building - Roo m2014 , Washington , D

C 20591 , Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430
.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Larry L. Richards,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: November 14, 2005

/s/ Larry L. Richards
-------------------------------------
Larry L. Richards
Controller (Principal Financial and
 Accounting Officer)
```

[House Document 113-138]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

113th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 113-138

 
                 A LETTER ON U.S. ARMED FORCES IN LIBYA

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

A REPORT ON ARMED FORCES SUPPORT TO THE SECURITY OF THE U.S. PERSONNEL 
                                IN LIBYA

   July 28, 2014.--Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 
                         ordered to be printed
                                           The White House,
                                         Washington, July 27, 2014.
Hon. John A. Boehner,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: As I most recently reported on June 12, 
2014, U.S. Armed Forces have been in Libya to support the 
security of U.S. personnel in that country. During the period 
July 25-26, due to ongoing violence resulting from clashes 
between Libyan militias in the immediate vicinity of the U.S. 
Embassy in Tripoli, embassy personnel and the U.S. forces 
supporting their security were temporarily relocated outside 
Libya. The U.S. forces departed Libya, via Tunisia, for U.S. 
bases in Europe. To support the safe departure of the embassy 
staff from Libya over land through Tunisia, U.S. military 
aircraft and additional military personnel entered Libya and 
Tunisia; those forces have also returned to bases in Europe.
    This action has been directed consistent with my 
responsibility to protect U.S. citizens both at home and 
abroad, and in furtherance of U.S. national security and 
foreign policy interests, pursuant to my constitutional 
authority to conduct U.S. foreign relations and as Commander in 
Chief and Chief Executive.
    I am providing this report as part of my efforts to keep 
the Congress fully informed, consistent with the War Powers 
Resolution (Public Law 93-148). I appreciate the support of the 
Congress in these actions.
            Sincerely,
                                                      Barack Obama.

                                  

```
§ 413.9 Confidentiality. ( a ) Any person furnishing information or data to the FAA may request in writing that trade secrets or proprietary commercial or financial data be treated as confidential. The request must be made at the time the information or data is submitted, and state the period of time for which confidential treatment is desired.
( b ) Information or data for which any person or agency requests confidentiality must be clearly marked with an identifying legend, such as “Proprietary Information,” “Proprietary Commercial Information,” “Trade Secret,” or “Confidential Treatment Requested.” Where this marking proves impracticable, a cover sheet containing the identifying legend must be securely attached to the compilation of information or data for which confidential treatment is requested.
( c ) If a person requests that previously submitted information or data be treated confidentially, the FAA will do so to the extent practicable in light of any prior distribution of the information or data.
( d ) Information or data for which confidential treatment has been requested or information or data that qualifies for exemption under section 552(b)(4) of Title 5, United States Code, will not be disclosed to the public unless the Associate Administrator determines that the withholding of the information or data is contrary to the public or national interest.