alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PARTIES — PRACTICE.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

June 1898.]

Cox, Smith and Swing, JJ.

#### †J. W. Davey v. Hyde, Park (Village.)

Party Fairing to Make any Effort to be made a Party Defendant tirr After Judgment wirr not be Aided by the Court.

Where a company stands by with full knowledge of the character of a cause in litigation, and does not ask to be made a party defendant until after the rendering of an adverse judgment, it will not thereafter be aided by the court in getting into the case.

*F. H. Kinney*and *Hollister & Hollister,*for plaintiff.

*W, J. Davidson*and *Edwin Gholson,*for the Village.

†

 For the first opinion of the court in this case, see Davey v. Hyde Park, 8 Ohio Circ. Dec., 371

Swing, J.

• We have reconsidered the matter in controversy here upon the questions raised in the brief of defendant.

Our conclusion, however, remains the same. Without considering whether the contract signed and intended to be the contract is in fact the contract between the parties, or whether the ordinance and the bond constitute the contract, in either event the plaintiff is entitled to an injunction. We think the ordinance is invalid on one ground at least, and that is that it is an ordinance granting certain rights to the company for the term of fifteen years, and one of the agreements is contained in sec. 15, of the ordinance which seeks to exempt them from taxation during-the time said plant shall be operated by said company, and by sec. 6 of the ordinance the company was granted the right to operate for the term of 15 years. This ordinance says: “ Hereby and herein granted and conferred, shall remain in full force and effect, commencing with the acceptance of this ordinance, and enduring fifteen years thereafter.” Ten years was the limit for which the village might contract; but it has agreed to either exempt from taxation the company’s property, or else to pay the company a sum equal to the amount of the municipal taxes levied against it..

With the filing of the brief for a rehearing the Electric Eight Company asked leave to be made a defendant and file an answer. Such request should only be granted in the interests of justice. It does not seem to me that any interests of justice will be subserved by allowing it to be filed. The company waited until after the judgment had been rendered and made no effort to be made a party, although its attorney appeared as assisting the village in the trial of the case. So that there is no question of surpiise or want of knowledge of the pendency of the action, but in fact the company stood by until the case was decided.

On the question of the merits of the controversy we have this to say in this connection, that in our opinion it was a very improvident contract for the village to make. With a possible yearly income of about $8,000 it was proposed by this ordinance to expend nearly $6,000 for electric lighting. Ño comment need be made on such conduct. The company will not now be aided in getting into this case, but will be left to work out its rights without regard to this action.
# EUR-Lex - 31996D0620 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996D0620

**96/620/EC: Council Decision of 1 October 1996 on the conclusion of an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco fixing, from 1 January 1994, the additional amount to be deducted from the levy or the customs duties on imports into the Community of untreated olive oil originating in Morocco **

*
Official Journal L 277 , 30/10/1996 P. 0035 - 0035 *

COUNCIL DECISION of 1 October 1996 on the conclusion of an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco fixing, from 1 January 1994, the additional amount to be deducted from the levy or the customs duties on imports into the Community of untreated olive oil originating in Morocco (96/620/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 113 in conjunction with the first sentence of Article 228 (2) thereof,

Having regard to the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Morocco (1), which entered into force on 1 November 1978, and in particular Annex B to the said Agreement,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco fixing the additional amount to be deducted from the levy or the customs duties on imports into the Community of untreated olive oil falling within CN codes 1509 10 10, 1509 10 90 and 1510 00 10 originating in Morocco, should be approved;

Whereas Council Regulation (EEC) No 3813/92 of 28 December 1992 on the unit of account and the conversion rates to be applied for the purposes of the common agricultural policy (2), abolishes application of a correcting factor of 1,207509 applied to the agricultural conversion rates up to 31 January 1995; whereas it is therefore necessary, taking account of the operative event for the agricultural conversion rate to be used, to provide for an amount for the period ending on 31 January 1995 and an amount applicable as from 1 February 1995,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco fixing, from 1 January 1994, the additional amount to be deducted from the levy or customs duties on imports into the Community of untreated olive oil originating in Morocco, is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorized to designate the person empowered to sign the Agreement in order to bind the Community.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Done at Luxembourg, 1 October 1996.

For the Council

The President

D. SPRING

(1) OJ No L 264, 27. 9. 1978, p. 2.

(2) OJ No L 387, 31. 12. 1992, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 150/95 (OJ No L 22, 31. 1. 1995, p. 1).
Exhibit 10.5
20% Buchanan Assignment
ASSIGNMENT

THIS ASSIGNMENT made and entered into and effective April 1, 2003 executed in
triplicate originals by and between Eastern Consolidated Energy, Inc. ("ECEI")
and James Buchanan and/or assignee, ("Purchaser").

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, ECEI as Lessee, holds rights in and to the Warfield property (the
"Property") described in that certain Lease Agreement which will be
subsequently attached as Exhibit "A" hereof; and

WHEREAS, Purchaser desires to purchaser a twenty percent (20%) Net Working
Interest (the net profit before income tax and any loss from a prior month
will be recouped before payment is made) in said mine for One Hundred Thousand
Dollars.

WHEREAS, ECEI is willing to assign the twenty percent (20%) Net Working
Interest (the net profit before income tax and any loss from a prior month
will be recouped before payment is made) , upon the terms and conditions set
out herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants
set forth below, the adequacy and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, ECEI and Purchaser agree as follows:
1. ECEI hereby assigns to Purchaser, without warranties of any kind except
those listed in (a) & (b) below, the twenty percent (20%) Net Working Interest
( the net profit before income tax and any loss from a prior month will be
recouped before payment is made) interest in and to the Lease. ECEI warrants
that:
(a) It will furnish Purchaser with a true and complete copy of the Lease; and
(b) It is not in default on the Lease, and has not received any notice of
default from any Lessor (the "Lessors") on the Lease.
2. Purchaser hereby accepts assignment of ECEI's twenty percent (20%) Net
Working Interest (the net profit before income tax and any loss from a prior
month will be recouped before payment is made) of the Lease.
3.  By this Lease Assignment, ECEI assigns to Purchaser only such rights and
privileges as it possesses under the Lease and no more.
4. Notices required hereunder shall be sent certified mail to the addresses
specified below and shall be effective as of the date postmarked thereon.

To ECEI:                                     To Purchaser:
Larry Hunt                                   James Buchanan
9900 W. Sample Road Suite #300               726 Windmere Dr.
Coral Springs, FL 33065                      Phoenix, AZ 85048

5.  The rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall be interpreted
in    accordance with the laws of the State of Florida.
6. This Assignment shall not be modified or amended except in writing executed
by both parties.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Assignment as of the day
and year first written above.

BY:/s/James Buchanan                     BY:/s/Larry Hunt
James Buchanan, Individual               Larry Hunt, President - ECEI
§ 60.25 Operation with missing, malfunctioning, or inoperative components. ( a ) No person may knowingly use or allow the use of or misrepresent the capability of an FSTD for any maneuver, procedure, or task that is to be accomplished to meet training, evaluation, or flight experience requirements of this chapter for flight crewmember certification or qualification when there is a missing, malfunctioning, or inoperative (MMI) component that is required to be present and correctly operate for the satisfactory completion of that maneuver, procedure, or task.
( b ) Each MMI component as described in paragraph (a) of this section, or any MMI component installed and required to operate correctly to meet the current Statement of Qualification, must be repaired or replaced within 30 calendar days, unless otherwise required or authorized by the responsible Flight Standards office.
( c ) A list of the current MMI components must be readily available in or adjacent to the FSTD for review by users of the device. Electronic access to this list via an appropriate terminal or display in or adjacent to the FSTD is satisfactory. The discrepancy log may be used to satisfy this requirement provided each currently MMI component is listed in the discrepancy log.
[Docket No. FAA-2002-12461, 71 FR 63426, Oct. 30, 2006, as amended by Docket No. FAA-2022-1355, Amdt. No. 60-7, 87 FR 75711, Dec. 9, 2022]
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned, David J Cutler, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of Multi-Link Telecommunications, Inc., (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report Form 10QSB for the nine months ended June 30, 2002
of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1034, and the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:       September 30, 2004





By  /s/David J Cutler
    -----------------------------
    David J Cutler
    Chief Executive Officer
    Chief Financial Officer



4

28
### RONALD S. GUTIERREZ

LAWYER

LAS COLINAS STATION

P. O. BOX 143243
IRVING, TEXAS 75014

TEL. (512) 222

- 3488 EMAIL: rsg.lawyer @ gmail.com FAX (512) 233

- 2786

May 18 , 2015

VIA EFile

Ms. Consuelo Gomez

, Lead Civil Operations Clerk

BEXAR COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK

101 W. Nueva , Suite 217 San Antonio, Texas 78205

- 3411

Re: No. 2014

- CI

- 15319, Heather C. Tessmer vs. Tina M. Allen Souza,

225 th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Dear Ms. Gomez :

I r equest that you prepare a supplemental clerk’s record for filing in the appeal of the above

- referenced cause. This request is made pu r suant to Rule 34.5(c)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The supplemental record should contain the following :

(1 ) Motion to Set, filed on February 13, 2015; (2 ) Motion to Set, filed on February 25, 2015; and (3) This letter.

Upon completion, please contact me, and I will promptly pay the costs for preparation of the supplemental record so that you can file i t in the Fourth Court of Appeals in No. 04

- 15

- 00153

- CV. Thank you for your prompt attention.

Very truly yours,

/s/ 

### Ronald S. Gutierrez

Ronald S. Gutierrez

Attor ney for Tina M. Allen Souza

cc: Fourth Court of Appeals, No. 04

- 15

- 00153

- CV via EFile

He ather Clement Tessmer via eServe, via facsimile at (210) 368

- 9729, and

via email at info@tessmerlawfirm.com

file ACCEPTED
04-15-00153-CV
FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
5/18/2015 9:33:36 AM
KEITH HOTTLE
CLERK
#### Catherine I. Cosgrove, as Administratrix of the Estate of Catherine Cosgrove, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*City of Newburgh, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

Argued January 18, 1937;

decided March 9, 1937.

*543
      *Raphael A. Egan, Corporation Counsel,*for appellant.

*Russell Wiggins*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, OBrien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
----

| (1) | Registration      Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-3212) pertaining to the Columbus McKinnon      Corporation 1995 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the Columbus McKinnon      Corporation Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, the Columbus McKinnon      Corporation Restricted Stock Plan and the Columbus McKinnon Corporation      Employee Stock Ownership Plan Restatement Effective April 1, 1989 of      Columbus McKinnon Corporation, |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | Registration      Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-81719) pertaining to the Options assumed by      Columbus McKinnon Corporation originally granted under the GL      International, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan and the Larco Industrial      Services Ltd. 1997 Stock Option Plan,and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (3) | Registration      Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-137212) pertaining to the Columbus McKinnon      Corporation 2006 Long Term IncentivePlan |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
§ 433.3 Issuance of a license to operate a reentry site. ( a ) The FAA issues a license to operate a reentry site when it determines that an applicant's operation of the reentry site does not jeopardize public health and safety, the safety of property, U.S. national security or foreign policy interests, or international obligations of the United States.
( b ) A license to operate a reentry site authorizes a licensee to operate a reentry site in accordance with the representations contained in the licensee's application, subject to the licensee's compliance with terms and conditions contained in any license order accompanying the license.
**Exhibit
      32.2**






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Financial Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
      D. Cahill, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Michael D. Cahill





Michael
      D. Cahill


Chief
      Financial Officer and Secretary


May
      12,
      2006
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCPW-13-0000080 

01-APR-2013 

10:42 AM 

SCPW-13-0000080
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I 

MICHAEL C. TIERNEY, Petitioner,
 

vs.
 

NOLAN ESPINDA, Warden of Halawa Correctional Facility;


KEONE MORREIRA, Case Manager of Module 3 at Halawa, Respondents.
 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)
 

Upon consideration of petitioner Michael C. Tierney’s
 

motion for reconsideration of the March 14, 2013 order denying
 

his petition for a writ of mandamus, which was electronically
 

filed by the appellate clerk on March 22, 2013, 


IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for
 

reconsideration is denied.
 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, April 1, 2013. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Amdocs Limited (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Dov
Baharav, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of his knowledge and belief:

          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated: September 21, 2004

/s/  DOV BAHARAV
---------------------------------------------------------
Dov Baharav
Chief Executive Officer
Amdocs Management Limited
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

Wniteb ~tate~ ~ourt of ~peaI~ 

for tbejf eberaI ~ircuit 

AUGUST TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 

AND RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v. 

CAMTEK, LTD., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

2010-1458 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Minnesota in Case No. 05-CV-1396, Chief 

Judge Michael J. Davis. 

ON MOTION 

Before NEWMAN, FRIEDMAN, and LOURIE, Circuit Judges. 

LOURIE, Circuit Judge. 

ORDER 

Camtek, Ltd. ("Camtek") moves for a partial stay of a 

permanent injunction issued by the United States District 

Court for the District of Minnesota. August Technology 

Corporation ("August") opposes.
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of Pulaski Financial Corp.

Registrant

Pulaski Financial Corp.



|                                     |  |                         |  |                                       
|------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Subsidiaries                         |  | Percentage of Ownership |  | Jurisdiction or State of Incorporation
|Pulaski Bank (1)                     |  | 100%                    |  | United States                         
|Pulaski Service Corporation (1), (2) |  | 100%                    |  | Missouri                              
|Pulaski Financial Statutory Trust I  |  | 100%                    |  | Connecticut                           
|Pulaski Financial Statutory Trust II |  | 100%                    |  | Delaware                              

---

|(1) | Are included in the Registrants Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Annual Report to Stockholders.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Wholly-owned by Pulaski Bank.
|--- | -----------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 31996D0256 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996D0256

**96/256/EC: Commission Decision of 26 March 1996 amending Commission Decision 95/190/EC laying down specific conditions for importing fishery and aquaculture products from the Philippines (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 086 , 04/04/1996 P. 0083 - 0085 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 26 March 1996 amending Commission Decision 95/190/EC laying down specific conditions for importing fishery and aquaculture products from the Philippines (Text with EEA relevance) (96/256/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 (1), laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products, as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 11 (5) thereof,

Whereas the list of establishments approved by the Philippines for importing fishery and aquaculture products into the Community has been drawn up in Commission Decision 95/190/EC (2); whereas this list may be amended following the communication of a new list by the competent authority in the Philippines;

Whereas the competent authority in the Philippines has communicated a new list adding 17 establishments and amending the date of 2 establishments;

Whereas it is necessary to amend the list of approved establishments accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision have been drawn up in accordance with the procedure laid down by Commission Decision 90/13/EEC (3),

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex B of Decision 95/190/EC is replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 March 1996.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15.

(2) OJ No L 123, 3. 6. 1995, p. 20.

(3) OJ No L 8, 11. 1. 1990, p. 70.

ANNEX

'ANNEX B

LIST OF APPROVED ESTABLISHMENTS

>TABLE>
EXHIBIT  32.2  --  CERTIFICATION  OF  CHIEF  FINANCIAL  OFFICER OF FIRST CAPITAL
INTERNATIONAL,  INC.,  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
AND  SECTION  1350  OF  18  U.S.C.  63.


I,  Alex Genin, the Chief Financial Officer of First Capital International, Inc.
hereby  certify that First Capital International, Inc.'s periodic report on Form
10QSB  and  the  financial  statements contained therein fully complies with the
requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15  U.S.C.  78m or 78o(d) and that information contained in the periodic report
on  Form 10QSB and the financial statements contained therein fairly represents,
in  all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations
of  First  Capital  International,  Inc.

Date:  May 13, 2004              /s/ Alex Genin
                                 Chief Financial Officer of
                                 First Capital International, Inc.


<PAGE>