alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Kennedy Space 

Spaceport Develo

COMSTACLaunch OperationWorking Group May 17, 2007Jim BallSpaceport DevelopmNASA Kennedy Spa
KSC Spaceport Development

Update Summary

• Continuing Shuttle Landing Facility (SLF) Expan

Access Demonstration Program

• Completing Environmental Assessment for SLF

Expanded Uses

• Supporting Commercial Orbital Transportation S• Implementing cooperative agreement with Spac

to help facilitate improved spaceport infrastructaccess
SLF Expanded Access 

Demonstration Program

• Initiated in July 2005• To date, hosted seven

diverse pathfinder projects

• Proven compatibility of 

uses with NASA’s mission and requirements

• Demonstrating operating

concepts and parameters applicable to future uses, e.g. suborbital spaceflight 
Starfighters Aerospace

F-104 Suborbital Pathfinder Project

• Simulating suborbital flight

trajectories and operatingconcepts

• Initial test flights provided

sonic boom data for FAA

• Testing of Autonomous 

Flight Safety System &other instruments planned

• Other proof-of-concept 

tests are in planning stagewith NASA and FAA

SLF Expanded Use

Environmental Assessment

• Initiated in October 2006• Draft is in final preparation• Addresses expanded uses

envisioned from 2008

-2015

- Spaceflight Development/Ops- Spaceflight Program &

Mission Support Aviation

- Aviation Test Operations- Airborne R&D- Other test applications

• Anticipate final draft by end of

July 
Potential infrastructure enhancements at SLF 

field area to support expanded uses

Interagency Agreement Between

NASA and Space Florida

• Agreement recently signed to facilitate coopera

planning for improved spaceport infrastructure 

access

• Facilitates joint planning and pre-development a

to:- Renew and upgrade existing infrastructure an

technologies at NASA-KSC

- Improve access to and utility of spaceport infr

and capabilities by commercial space services 

providers

- Foster a robust spaceport hosting diverse 

but compatible uses supporting civil space
Exhibit 31.1
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, David Guthrie, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report of Consolidated Energy, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2004

/s/David Guthrie
David Guthrie, President (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4419 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4419

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to provide outer burial receptacles for each new grave 
   in cemeteries that are the subjects of certain grants made by the 
         Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 4, 2020

 Mr. Rounds (for himself, Mr. Cassidy, and Mrs. Blackburn) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                          on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to provide outer burial receptacles for each new grave 
   in cemeteries that are the subjects of certain grants made by the 
         Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Burial Benefit Correction 
Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. OUTER BURIAL RECEPTACLES FOR EACH NEW GRAVE IN CEMETERIES THAT 
              ARE THE SUBJECTS OF CERTAIN GRANTS MADE BY THE SECRETARY 
              OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 2306(e) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting ``, or in a cemetery 
        that is the subject of a grant to a State or a tribal 
        organization under section 2408 of this title,'' after 
        ``National Cemetery Administration''; and
            (2) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following 
        new paragraph (2):
    ``(2)(A) The use of outer burial receptacles in a cemetery under 
the control of the National Cemetery Administration or in a cemetery 
that is the subject of a grant to a State or a tribal organization 
under section 2408 of this title shall be in accordance with 
regulations or procedures approved by the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs.
    ``(B) The use of outer burial receptacles in Arlington National 
Cemetery shall be in accordance with regulations or procedures approved 
by the Secretary of the Army.
    ``(C) The use of outer burial receptacles in a national cemetery 
administered by the National Park Service shall be in accordance with 
regulations or procedures approved by the Secretary of the Interior.''.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered November 13 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00236

- CR

OTIS GARDNER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10

- 56220

- Q



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATE S the appeal.

On October 29, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to
pursue the appeal; ( 2) appellant is indigent and represented by appointed counsel J. Daniel Oliphant; (3) Mr. Oliphant’s explanation for the delay in filing appellant’s brief is his workload; and (4) Mr. Oliphant requested until December 27, 2013 to file appellant’s brief.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief by FRIDAY, DECEMBER 27, 2013

. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to
counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25794]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-11049]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of Citizen Advocacy Panel, Brooklyn District

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Brooklyn District Citizen Advocacy 
Panel will be held in Brooklyn, New York.

DATES: The meeting will be held Friday, May 19, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen Cain at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-
488-3555.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an operational meeting of the Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held 
Friday, May 19, 2000, 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. at the Internal Revenue Service 
Brooklyn Building located at 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201.
    For more information or to confirm attendance, notification of 
intent to attend the meeting must be made with Eileen Cain. Mrs. Cain 
can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3555.
    The public is invited to make oral comments from 8:30 p.m. to 9 
p.m. on Friday, May 19, 2000.
    Individual comments will be limited to 5 minutes. If you would like 
to have the CAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-
1227 or 718-488-3555, or write Eileen Cain, CAP Office, P.O. Box R, 
Brooklyn, NY, 11201.

    The Agenda will include the following: various IRS issues.

    Note: Last minute changes to the agenda are possible and could 
prevent effective advance notice.


    Dated: April 21, 2000.
M. Cathy Vanhorn,
Director, CAP Communications & Liaison.
[FR Doc. 00-11049 Filed 5-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 24.9


                               KEYSPAN CORPORATION

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



     WHEREAS,  KeySpan  Corporation,  a New York  corporation  (the  "Company"),
intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an Annual Report on Form 10-K as prescribed by
said Commission  pursuant to said Act and the rules and regulations  promulgated
thereunder.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  in my capacity as a director of the Company,  I do hereby
appoint GERALD LUTERMAN, JOHN J. BISHAR, JR. and MICHAEL J. TAUNTON, and each of
them  severally,  as my  attorneys-in-fact  with power to execute in my name and
place, and in my capacity as a director of KeySpan Corporation, said Report, any
amendment  to said  Report  and  any  other  documents  required  in  connection
therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this power of attorney this 21st day of
February, 2007.


                                                       /s/Vikki L. Pryor
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4721 

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to increase the 

criminal penalties under such Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2020 

Mrs. LOEFFLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to 

increase the criminal penalties under such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securing Our Elections 

5 Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF CRIMINAL PENALTY FOR TAM7 PERING WITH OR INTERFERING IN AN ELEC8 TION FOR FEDERAL OFFICE. 

9 Section 12 of the National Voter Registration Act of 

10 1993 (52 U.S.C. 20511) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4721 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘fined in accordance with title 

2 18, United States Code,’’ and inserting ‘‘fined not 

3 more than $100,000’’; and 

4 (2) by striking ‘‘imprisoned not more than 5 

5 years’’ and inserting ‘‘imprisoned not less than 5 

6 years and not more than 15 years’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 17, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129178 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

BLYTHE SNEIDERAITIS and Maura D. Corrigan 

CHRISTOPHER SNEIDERAITIS, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/ Justices Appellees, 

v SC: 129178 

 COA: 252059 

Oakland CC: 2003-047947-CK 

RONALD BURROWS and JOSEPH 

KOZIARA, 

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/

Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgments of the Court of Appeals 

and the Oakland Circuit Court and REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for 

further proceedings. Defendants claim that plaintiffs purchased the property at a 

foreclosure sale after fraudulently misrepresenting to defendants that if defendants 

removed the property from the market, plaintiff would act as defendants’ attorney in 

dealing with the mortgage company and would purchase the property before foreclosure. 

Summary disposition was improper because genuine issues of material fact exist on 

defendants’ claim that plaintiffs secured title to the property by means of fraudulent 

misrepresentations. McKie v Oakland Mortgage Co, 277 Mich 292, 294-295 (1936); 

Gates v Sutherland, 76 Mich 231, 233 (1889); and Cleland v Taylor, 3 Mich 201 (1854). 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

p0510 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 17, 2006 

Clerk
§ 65.19 Retesting after failure. An applicant for a written, oral, or practical test for a certificate and rating, or for an additional rating under this part, may apply for retesting— ( a ) After 30 days after the date the applicant failed the test; or
( b ) Before the 30 days have expired if the applicant presents a signed statement from an airman holding the certificate and rating sought by the applicant, certifying that the airman has given the applicant additional instruction in each of the subjects failed and that the airman considers the applicant ready for retesting.
[Doc. No. 16383, 43 FR 22640, May 25, 1978]
§ 25.1145 Ignition switches. ( a ) Ignition switches must control each engine ignition circuit on each engine.
( b ) There must be means to quickly shut off all ignition by the grouping of switches or by a master ignition control.
( c ) Each group of ignition switches, except ignition switches for turbine engines for which continuous ignition is not required, and each master ignition control must have a means to prevent its inadvertent operation.
[Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 25-40, 42 FR 15044 Mar. 17, 1977]
Exhibit 31.1CertificationsI, Bruce Armstrong, President, Principal Executive Officer of Knova Software, Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Knova Software, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: January 17, 2006 /s/    Bruce Armstrong   Bruce Armstrong   Title:  Principal ExecutiveOfficer   
33
#### GOODMAN v TENBUSCH et

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 9294.

Decided Feb 11, 1929

A M Gibbons, Cleveland, for Goodman.

Krueg.er & Pelton, Cleveland, for Tenbusch.

MIIDDLETON, PJ, MAUCK, J, of the 4th Dist, and ROBERTS, J, of the 7th Dist sitting.

MAUCK, J.

Under this state of facts it is clear that the deed vested in Mr. Tenbusch nothing but the naked legal title and that the entire equitable estate was in his wife. As between the parties thereto Mrs. Tenbusch had a right to the reconveyance. '

Under some circumstances Mrs. Tenbusch would not be permitted to enforce her equities by securing a reconveyance. When she placed her deed in her husband’s hands and made it-possible for the deed to find its Way to the public records, she would have had to suffer any loss occasioned by the fact that the deed was recorded. If the plaintiff herein had contracted with Mr. Tenbusch on the strength of his apparent ownership of this property, Mrs. Tenbusch would be estopped from asserting her equities in the premises. The plaintiff cannot urge an estoppel however, for the reason that he did not accept Tenbusch as surety on the supposition that the latter owned the property nor did he otherwise change his position in any respect by reason of any such supposition. When the contract of suretyship was entered into Mrs. Tenbusch appeared of record as the sole owner of the property in question.

The petition of the plaintiff is dismissed.

Middleton and Roberts, JJ, concur.
OPEN FILE 1969

4 164°.00'

_ 66°15"

_164° 30!

I

oy

1000
— 900

1450
—o

———__
\

‘ |
> o>, \ |
NOP Ye, GF Anchorag i |
ee ) ( ov’ \
\ — ; an per - oe |
‘4 c ->> 5° L ¥ |
/ s CY |
As >
c “G aan CY a |
_ 7 Ps
CS ve
rv ISL A
— LN
/
, ( laos |
Vth yee Oo
100 if
oy = 0° 208 300 miles

Scale

MAP OF ALASKA SHOWING LOCATION OF SEWARD PENINSULA AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL

SURVEYS, 1968. SEE DETAILED INDEX FOR ACTUAL COVERAGE.

APPROXIMATE

| 65° 45°

164°00'
Flown and compiled by Lockwood, Kessler,
and Bartlett, Inc., 1968.

RD PENINSULA AREA, ALASKA

AEROMAGNETIC MAP AND PROFILES OF PART OF THE
SEWARD PENINSULA ALASKA

meee SHEET NUMBER 6 OF II
: LKB 1968
Beo
‘ —
s This map is preliminary
oS. 3 RVEY ‘
Reiaesed <a upeo fle and has not been edited

or reviewed for conformity
to Geological Survey standards
#### BUCYRUS (city) v STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21501.

Decided Apr 24, 1929

Syllabus by

ROBINSON, J

STATE

(540 P2) The provisions of Article XVIII of the Constitution of Ohio do not deprive the state of any sovereignty over municipalities in respect to sanitation for the promotion or preservation of the public health which it elects to exercise by general laws.

The holdings of this court in the case of State Board of Health v. Greenville, 86 Ohio St., 1, are as applicable to municipalities since the adoption of Article XVIII as they were before the adoption of that article, and will be adhered to.

The report of an investigation required by Section 1249, General Code, is competent evidence at a hearing provided for in Section 1250, General Code, but is not conclusive, and the persons" securing the data and compiling, the report are subject to cross-examination land impeachment.

Marshall, CJ, Kinkade, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ, concur.