alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Docket Index: EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0499 

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan; California; Calaveras County, Chico (Butte 

County), San Francisco Bay Area and San Luis Obispo County (Eastern San Luis Obispo) Base 

Year Emission Inventories for the 2008 Ozone Standards.

A. Notices

A.1. Direct Final Rule - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan; California; Calaveras

County, Chico (Butte County), San Francisco Bay Area and San Luis Obispo County (Eastern San

Luis Obispo) Base Year Emission Inventories for the 2008 Ozone Standards (October 19, 2016)

A.2. Proposed Rule - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan; California; Calaveras

County, Chico (Butte County), San Francisco Bay Area and San Luis Obispo County (Eastern San

Luis Obispo) Base Year Emission Inventories for the 2008 Ozone Standards (October 19, 2016)

B. State Submittal

B.1. CARB Transmittal letter to EPA dated July 17, 2014

B.2. CARB Notice of Public Meeting To Consider the Approval of the 8-Hour Ozone SIP

Submittal

B.3. CARB 2008 8-hour Ozone Emission Inventory SIP submittal

B.4. CARB resolution, signed June 26, 2014

B.5. CARB Public Hearing Transcript June 14, 2014

C. FR Notices

C.1. 73 FR 16436 (March 12, 2008)

C.2. 77 FR 30088 (May 21, 2012)

C.3. 78 FR 34178 (June 6, 2013)

C.4. 80 FR 12264 (March 6, 2015)

C.5. 81 FR 26697 (May 4, 2016)

C.6. 78 FR 14533 (March 16, 2013)

C.7. 80 FR 77337 (December 14, 2015)

D. Other Documents and Correspondence

D.1. CARB Ozone Emission Inventory Supplemental Documentation (September 2016)

D.2. September 2, 2016 email correspondence from Stephanie Detwiler to N. Levin, re: list

D.3. Attachment 2, Appendix D, Emission Inventory Methodology, Agricultural Irrigation PumpsDiesel (August 2006)

D.4. CARB, Section 7.6 Livestock Husbandry Emission Inventory Methodology (Rev. May 2004)

D.5. CARB, Section 7.1 Residential Wood Combustion Emission Inventory Methodology (Rev.

October 2015)

D.6. Pesticide Use Reports www.cdpr.ca.gov/docspur/purmain.htm

D.7. CARB Mobile Source Emission Inventory www.arb.ca.gov_msei_msei.htm
#### § 374.4 Enforcement procedure.

The statutes and regulations referred to in § 374.3 may be enforced by an enforcement procedure as set forth in part 302 of this chapter or by the assessment of civil penalties under 49 U.S.C. 46301.

[62 FR 25842, May 12, 1997]
EXHIBIT 10.05


 


FIRST AMENDMENT


 


This
First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 31
day of August, 2009 (the “First Amendment Effective Date”) and amends the
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of September 29, 2008
(the “Employment Agreement”), by and between NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC. (“NFM”)
and SCOTT PIPER (“Executive”).  Unless
otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used shall have the meaning
ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement.


 


In
consideration of the foregoing, and other good and valuable consideration,
including Executive’s continued employment with NFM, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Executive and NFM hereby agree as
follows:


 


I.              AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENT


 


Section 1
“Term” is hereby amended by deleting such section in its entirety and
replacing the same with the following:


 


“The
Term of this Agreement shall begin as of the First Amendment Effective Date and
shall continue until midnight on August 31, 2012, or such other date as
the Agreement is terminated by either party as hereinafter provided (the “Term”).


 


II.            GENERAL PROVISIONS


 


All
other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement that have not been
specifically amended herein shall remain in full force and effect.  This First Amendment, together with the
Employment Agreement, contains all of the terms and conditions agreed upon by
the parties hereto regarding the subject matter hereof.  All prior agreements, promises, negotiations
and representations, either oral or written, relating to the subject matter of
this First Amendment or the Employment Agreement not expressly set forth in
this First Amendment or the Employment Agreement are of no force or
effect.  Any waiver, alteration or
modification of any of the terms of this First Amendment shall be valid only if
made in writing and signed by both parties hereto. This First Amendment may be
executed in up to two counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original
but together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first
set forth above.


 


 


	
  NEW
  FRONTIER MEDIA, INC.

  	
   

  	
  EXECUTIVE

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:
  

  	
  /s/
  Michael Weiner

  	
   

  	
  By:
  

  	
  /s/
  Scott Piper

  
	
  Name:
  Michael Weiner

  	
   

  	
  Name:
  Scott Piper

  
	
  Title:
  Chief Executive Officer
§ 450.209 Compliance monitoring. ( a ) A licensee must allow access by, and cooperate with, Federal officers or employees or other individuals authorized by the FAA to observe any of its activities, or any of its contractors' or subcontractors' activities, associated with the conduct of a licensed launch or reentry.
( b ) For each licensed launch or reentry, a licensee must provide the FAA with a console for monitoring the progress of the countdown and communication on all channels of the countdown communications network, unless the licensee has another acceptable means. A licensee must also provide the FAA with the capability to communicate with the mission director designated by § 450.103(a)(1).
#### § 389.13 Fees for services.

Fees for services and resources described in this subpart and subpart C of this part are pursuant to those fees set forth in 49 CFR part 7, subpart F, §§ 7.41 through 7.43, 7.45 and 7.46.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I,Gary D. Gall, President, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Western Sierra Bancorp(the “Registrant”);

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors:

 

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  August 11, 2003 |
|-----------------------------|
|                        |
|                        |
|                        |   | /s/  Gary D. Gall |   |
|                        | President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                             |  |  |  |  |

 

----
#### § 31.46 Pressurized fuel systems.

For pressurized fuel systems, each element and its connecting fittings and lines must be tested to an ultimate pressure of at least twice the maximum pressure to which the system will be subjected in normal operation. No part of the system may fail or malfunction during the test. The test configuration must be representative of the normal fuel system installation and balloon configuration.

[Amdt. 31-3, 41 FR 55474, Dec. 20, 1976]
§ 29.29 Empty weight and corresponding center of gravity. ( a ) The empty weight and corresponding center of gravity must be determined by weighing the rotorcraft without the crew and payload, but with— ( 1 ) Fixed ballast;
( 2 ) Unusable fuel; and
( 3 ) Full operating fluids, including— ( i ) Oil;
( ii ) Hydraulic fluid; and
( iii ) Other fluids required for normal operation of rotorcraft systems, except water intended for injection in the engines.
( b ) The condition of the rotorcraft at the time of determining empty weight must be one that is well defined and can be easily repeated, particularly with respect to the weights of fuel, oil, coolant, and installed equipment.
(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, and 605 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424, and 1425); and sec. 6(c) of the Dept. of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150. Dec. 3, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 29-15, 43 FR 2326, Jan. 16, 1978]
§ 406.1 Hearings in license, permit, and payload actions. ( a ) Pursuant to 51 U.S.C. 50912, the following are entitled to a determination on the record after an opportunity for a hearing in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 554. ( 1 ) An applicant for a license and a proposed transferee of a license regarding any decision to issue or transfer a license with conditions or to deny the issuance or transfer of such license;
( 2 ) An owner or operator of a payload regarding any decision to prevent the launch or reentry of the payload;
( 3 ) A licensee regarding any decision to suspend, modify, or revoke a license or to terminate, prohibit, or suspend any licensed activity;
( 4 ) An applicant for a permit regarding an FAA decision to issue a permit with conditions or to deny the issuance of the permit; and
( 5 ) A permittee regarding any decision to suspend, modify, or revoke a permit or to terminate, prohibit, or suspend any permitted activity.
( b ) An administrative law judge will be designated to preside over any hearing held under this part.
[Doc. No. FAA-2001-8607, 66 FR 2180, Jan. 10, 2001, as amended by Amdt. 406-4, 72 FR 17017, Apr. 6, 2007; Amdt. 406-7, 77 FR 20532, Apr. 5, 2012]
§ 417.223 Flight hazard area analysis. ( a ) *General.* A flight safety analysis must include a flight hazard area analysis that identifies any regions of land, sea, or air that must be surveyed, publicized, controlled, or evacuated in order to control the risk to the public from debris impact hazards. The risk management requirements of § 417.205(a) apply. The analysis must account for, at a minimum: ( 1 ) All trajectory times from liftoff to the planned safe flight state of § 417.219(c), including each planned impact, for an orbital launch, and through final impact for a suborbital launch;
( 2 ) Regions of land potentially exposed to debris resulting from normal flight events and events resulting from any potential malfunction;
( 3 ) Regions of sea and air potentially exposed to debris from normal flight events, including planned impacts;
( 4 ) In the vicinity of the launch site, any waterborne vessels, populated offshore structures, or aircraft exposed to debris from events resulting from any potential abnormal flight events, including launch vehicle malfunction;
( 5 ) Any operational controls implemented to control risk to the public from debris hazards;
( 6 ) Debris identified by the debris analysis of § 417.211; and
( 7 ) All launch vehicle trajectory dispersion effects in the surface impact domain.
( b ) Public notices. A flight hazard areas analysis must establish the ship hazard areas for notices to mariners that encompass the three-sigma impact dispersion area for each planned debris impact. A flight hazard areas analysis must establish the aircraft hazard areas for notices to airmen that encompass the 3-sigma impact dispersion volume for each planned debris impact. Section 417.121(e) contains procedural requirements for issuing notices to mariners and airmen.
SCWC-13-0000382

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

STATE OF HAWAI#I, 

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

RICHARD P. SILVA, III, 

Respondent/Defendant-Appellant.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-13-0000382; CR. NO. 11-1-0926)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawaii’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on January 8, 2015, is

hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 19, 2015.

Brian R. Vincent

for petitioner /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-13-0000382

19-FEB-2015

08:19 AM
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.22

2004 Executive Compensation Plan

Scott Schwartzman
COO/CFO

Components of Compensation:
Base Salary
Cash Bonus Incentive
Stock Options

2004 Plan
Base Salary:                                                    $ 195,000
Target Cash Incentive:                                          $ 100,000
                                                                ---------
Total Cash Compensation                                         $ 295,000

Current Equity (stock options held)                               950,000
Stock Options to be Granted in 2004*:                             500,000

*Special vesting schedule 25% after 1 year, 50% after 2 years, 25% after 3 years

2004 Cash Incentive Model:

Paid annually
Key Metric: EBIDTA
Minimum threshold to begin earning some bonus $700,000
Bonus caps at 150% of your target incentive and is earned at $3,000,000 EBIDTA.

You will earn 6.522% of every dollar for total year 2004 EBIDTA beginning at
$700,000 and capping at $3,000,000. Your cash incentive caps at 150% of your
target cash incentive stated above. 75% of the total earned will be paid
regardless. 25% of this total will be awarded based on individual performance as
determined by CEO.

Cash incentive will be paid in Q1 2005 to employees who were employed through
the end of FY2004.

Stock Options:

As part of your long term compensation for ServiceWare, you will receive a new
grant of 500,000 options of ServiceWare stock that will vest over three years.

<PAGE>

Severance Agreement

Your severance agreement will remain as stated in your employment agreement.

In consideration for the foregoing severance agreement and incentive plan, and
as a condition precedent to the granting thereof, you must sign a current
ServiceWare Technologies, Inc. Confidentiality, Non-Competition and Assignment
of Inventions Agreement, in the form attached hereto, and have it in our files.

Please sign, make a copy for yourself and return to Human Resources.

Signature: ____________________________________________________
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 93 (Friday, May 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 30588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12000]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6606-1]


Chesapeake Bay Program Activities Grants

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is issuing a request 
for proposals that will assist the Chesapeake Bay Program in meeting 
its goals and commitments. Approximately $2 million is available 
through the RFP. Subjects addressed in the RFP include air quality, 
nutrients, sediments, best management practices, chemical contaminants, 
communication, exotic species, fish, habitat restoration, oysters, 
student engagement, submerged aquatic vegetation, water quality, local 
government and community engagement, and sound land use. Functional 
categories that proposals should fall under include implementation and 
technical assistance; workshops, seminars, and training; monitoring and 
assessment; research and analysis; and education and outreach. 
Applicants must be a non-profit organization, local government, state 
agency, interstate agency, college, or university institution. Funding 
will be provided to an organization under the authority of the Clean 
Water Act, section 117.
    The RFP is available starting May 5, 2000 at the following web-
site: http://www.epa.edu/r3chespk/ You may request a paper copy by 
calling Carol Cochran at 215-815-2986 or by e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e0d010d061c0f00400d0f1c01022e0b1e0f40090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="accfc3cfc4decdc282cfcddec3c0ecc9dccd82cbc3da">[email protected]</span></a> or by calling Lori Mackey at 410-267-5715 or e-
mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9cf1fdfff7f9e5b2f0f3eef5dcf9ecfdb2fbf3ea"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d9b4b8bab2bca0f7b5b6abb099bca9b8f7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a>. All proposals must be received by the 
Chesapeake Bay Program Office by close of business June 9, 2000. Any 
late, incomplete, or faxed proposals will not be considered.

Peter J. Marx,
Acting Director, Chesapeake Bay Program.
[FR Doc. 00-12000 Filed 5-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 435.33 Safety review requirements and procedures.

Unless otherwise stated in this subpart, regulations applicable to safety review and approval of the reentry of an RLV contained in part 431, subpart C of this subchapter shall apply to the safety review conducted for a license to reenter a reentry vehicle under this part.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

I, Carl E. Vogel, the Chief Executive Officer of Renaissance Media Group LLC,
Renaissance Media (Louisiana) LLC, Renaissance Media (Tennessee) LLC and
Renaissance Media Capital Corporation (collectively, the Company) in
compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 (the Report) filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission:



| |  |  | fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                   
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                     
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Carl E. Vogel                                   
| |  |                                                     
| |  | Carl E. Vogel
Chief Executive Officer
April 18, 2003
§ 61.403 What are the age, language, and pilot certificate requirements for a flight instructor certificate with a sport pilot rating? To be eligible for a flight instructor certificate with a sport pilot rating you must: ( a ) Be at least 18 years old.
( b ) Be able to read, speak, write, and understand English. If you cannot read, speak, write, and understand English because of medical reasons, the FAA may place limits on your certificate as are necessary for the safe operation of light-sport aircraft.
( c ) Hold at least a sport pilot certificate with category and class ratings or privileges, as applicable, that are appropriate to the flight instructor privileges sought.
[Doc. No. FAA-2001-11133, 69 FR 44875, July 27, 2004, as amended by Amdt. 61-124, 74 FR 42562, Aug. 21, 2009]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
            AS ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific CMA, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bill
Stangland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (a)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

                                    By: /S/ Bill Stangland
                                        ----------------------------
                                        Bill Stangland, Chief Financial Officer

Date:   May 13, 2005
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Global Crossing Limited (Form S-8 No.’s 333-121079, 333-125281, and 333-133520 and Form S-3 No. 333-133466) of our reports datedMarch 2, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Global Crossing Limited and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Global Crossing Limited, included in this Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Iselin, New Jersey 

March 2, 2009
§ 415.53 Payloads not subject to review. The FAA does not review payloads that are— ( a ) Subject to regulation by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or the Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); or
( b ) Owned or operated by the U.S. Government.