alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 94 (Monday, May 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30977-30978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12084]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2634]


Great Northern Paper, Inc.; Notice of Authorization for Continued 
Project Operation

May 9, 2000.
    On April 28, 1998, Great Northern Paper, Inc., licensee for the 
Storage Project No. 2634, filed an application for a new or subsequent 
license pursuant to the Federal Power Act (FPA) and the Commission's 
regulations thereunder. Project No. 2634 is located on the West and 
South Branches of the Penobscot River in Somerset and Piscataquis 
Counties, Maine.
    The license for Project No. 2634 was issued for a period ending 
April 30, 2000. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), 
requires the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue 
from year to year an annual license to the then licensee under the 
terms and conditions of the prior license until a new license is 
issued, or the project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 
15 or any other applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior 
license waived the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based 
on section 9(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), 
and set forth at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project has 
filed an application for a subsequent license, the licensee may 
continue to operate the project in accordance with the terms and 
conditions of the license after the minor or minor part license 
expires, until the Commission acts on its application. If the licensee 
of such a project has not filed an application for a subsequent 
license, then it may be required, pursuant to 18 CFR 1621(b), to 
continue project operations until the Commission issues someone else a 
license for the project or otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 2634 is issued to 
Great Northern Paper, Inc. for a period effective May 1, 2000, through 
April 30, 2001, or until the issuance of a new license for the project

[[Page 30978]]

or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If issuance 
of a new license (or other disposition) does not take place on or 
before April 30, 2001, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 CFR 
16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is 
renewed automatically without further order or notice by the 
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that Great Northern Paper, Inc. is authorized to continue 
operation of the storage Project No. 3634 until such time as the 
Commission acts on its application for subsequent license.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-12084 Filed 5-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 302
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 302 appear at 84 FR 15935, Apr. 16, 2019.

§ 302.217 Exceptions to administrative law judge's initial or recommended decision. ( a ) Within seven (7) days after service of any initial or recommended decision of an administrative law judge, any party may file exceptions to the decision with the DOT decisionmaker.
( b ) If timely and adequate exceptions are filed, review of the initial or recommended decision is automatic.
( c ) In all other respects, the provisions of § 302.34 shall apply.
Exhibit 4.1

                            CORONADO INDUSTRIES, INC.
                      16929 E. Enterprise Drive, Suite 202
                            Fountain Hills, AZ 85268

                                   May 1, 2003

Coronado Employees and Consultants,

     The  Company's  Board of  Directors  has decided to make  available  to all
employees and consultants,  shares of the Company's common stock at a negotiated
price of not less than 90% of the lowest closing bid price during the week prior
to the employee's payday.

     To participate  in this program,  all you have to do is execute this letter
in the space below,  and indicate the amount of wages you wish to have allocated
to this Plan and the pay period from which your salary  will be  credited.  Your
free-trading shares will be delivered to you within a few days.


                                        Coronado Industries, Inc.


                                        By: /s/ Gary R. Smith
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Gary R. Smith, President



----------------------------            ----------------------------------------
Amount of Wages                         Employee Signature


----------------------------            ----------------------------------------
Pay Period From                         Name of Employee
Which To Be Paid                        (Please Print)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6435

THOMAS WAYNE HANSFORD,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

AMANDA COBB, Superintendent of the Dan River Prison Work Farm,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:18-cv-00242-FDW)

Submitted: July 17, 2019 Decided: August 2, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Wayne Hansford, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Wayne Hansford seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 

U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition as untimely. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief 

on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists 

would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or 

wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that 

the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hansford has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### § 415.55 Classes of payloads.

The FAA may review and issue findings regarding a proposed class of payload, e.g., communications, remote sensing or navigation. However, each payload is subject to compliance monitoring by the FAA before launch to determine whether its launch would jeopardize public health and safety, safety of property, U.S. national security or foreign policy interests, or international obligations of the United States. The licensee is responsible for providing current information, in accordance with § 417.17(b)(2), regarding a payload proposed for launch not later than 60 days before a scheduled launch.

[Amdt. 415-03, 64 FR 19616, Apr. 21, 1999, as amended by Amdt. No. 415-6, 81 FR 59439, Aug. 30, 2016]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Tower Mountain quadrangle, Oregon:7.5-minute series (topographic)**
 
2012 | 2014 | 2015 | 2017
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28/6:45118-A 5/
Item Number:0080-G-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000931996
 
January 24, 2018
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7705

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

VINCENT PERNELL KYLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District 

Judge. (1:08-cr-00035-GMW-PMS-4)

Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 28, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent Pernell Kyle, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall 

Ramseyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Vincent Pernell Kyle appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Kyle, 

No. 1:08-cr-00035-GMW-PMS-4 (W.D. Va. Dec. 6, 2011). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
# Official Journal C 297/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.297.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 297 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 533 November 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.297.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 297

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 533 November 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 297/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2010/C 297/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 297/01

Euro exchange rates

1

2010/C 297/02

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2010/C 297/03 | Notice of open competitions | 3 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 297/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6023 — Österreichische Post/Schweizerische Post/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 4 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2010/C 297/03

Notice of open competitions

3

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2010/C 297/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6023 — Österreichische Post/Schweizerische Post/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# EUR-Lex - 31996R1601 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996R1601

**Council Regulation (EC) No 1601/96 of 30 July 1996 laying down, in respect of hops, the amount of aid to producers for the 1995 harvest **

*
Official Journal L 206 , 16/08/1996 P. 0046 - 0047 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1601/96 of 30 July 1996 laying down, in respect of hops, the amount of aid to producers for the 1995 harvest

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1696/71 of 26 July 1971 on the common organization of the market in hops (1) and in particular Article 12 (7) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Whereas Article 12 of Regulation (EEC) No 1696/71 provides that aid may be granted to hop producers to enable them to achieve a fair income; whereas the amount of this aid is fixed per hectare and differs according to varieties, taking into account the average return on the areas in full production as compared with the average returns for previous harvests, the current position of the market and trends in costs;

Whereas Article 12a of the said Regulation provides that aid to producers may also be granted for areas cultivated with experimental strains in order to facilitate the development of new varieties;

Whereas an examination of the results of the 1995 harvest reveals the need to fix aid for groups of varieties of hops cultivated in the Community; whereas aid to producers should also be granted for areas cultivated with experimental strains,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1. For the 1995 harvest, aid shall be granted to the producers of hops cultivated in the Community for the groups of varieties set out in the Annex as well as for experimental strains.

2. The amount of the aid shall be as set out in the Annex.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 July 1996.

For the Council

The President

H. COVENEY

(1) OJ No C 175, 4. 8. 1971, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by the 1994 Act of Accession and Regulation (EC) No 3290/94 (OJ No L 349, 31. 12. 1994, p. 105).

(2) OJ No C 198, 8. 7. 1996.

ANNEX

Aid to hop producers for the 1995 harvest

>TABLE>
§ 382.115 What requirements apply to on-board safety briefings? As a carrier, you must comply with the following requirements with respect to on-board safety briefings: ( a ) You must conduct an individual safety briefing for any passenger where required by 14 CFR 121.571(a)(3) and (a)(4), 14 CFR 135.117(b), or other FAA requirements.
( b ) You may offer an individual briefing to any other passenger, but you may not require an individual to have such a briefing except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) You must not require any passenger with a disability to demonstrate that he or she has listened to, read, or understood the information presented, except to the extent that carrier personnel impose such a requirement on all passengers with respect to the general safety briefing. You must not take any action adverse to a qualified individual with a disability on the basis that the person has not “accepted” the briefing.
( d ) When you conduct an individual safety briefing for a passenger with a disability, you must do so as inconspicuously and discreetly as possible.
( e ) The accessibility requirements for onboard video safety presentations that carriers must meet are outlined in section 382.69.
§ 5.25 Designation and responsibilities of required safety management personnel. ( a ) *Designation of the accountable executive.* Any person required to have an SMS under this part must identify an accountable executive who, irrespective of other functions, satisfies the following: ( 1 ) Is the final authority over operations authorized to be conducted under the person's certificate(s) or Letter(s) of Authorization.
( 2 ) Controls the financial resources required for the operations to be conducted under the person's certificate(s) or Letter(s) of Authorization.
( 3 ) Controls the human resources required for the operations authorized to be conducted under the person's certificate(s) or Letter(s) of Authorization.
( 4 ) Retains ultimate responsibility for the safety performance of the operations conducted under the person's certificate(s) or Letter(s) of Authorization.
( b ) *Responsibilities of the accountable executive.* The accountable executive must accomplish the following: ( 1 ) Ensure that the SMS is properly implemented and is performing across all pertinent areas.
( 2 ) Develop and sign the safety policy.
( 3 ) Communicate the safety policy throughout the person's organization.
( 4 ) Regularly review the safety policy to ensure it remains relevant and appropriate to the person.
( 5 ) Regularly review the safety performance and direct actions necessary to address substandard safety performance in accordance with § 5.75.
( c ) *Designation of management personnel.* The accountable executive must designate sufficient management personnel who, on behalf of the accountable executive, are responsible for the following: ( 1 ) Coordinate implementation, maintenance, and integration of the SMS throughout the person's organization.
( 2 ) Facilitate hazard identification and safety risk analysis.
( 3 ) Monitor the effectiveness of safety risk controls.
( 4 ) Ensure safety promotion throughout the person's organization as required in subpart E of this part.
( 5 ) Regularly report to the accountable executive on the performance of the SMS and on any need for improvement.
[Doc. No. FAA-2021-0419, Amdt. 5-2, 89 FR 33106, Apr. 26, 2024]
# EUR-Lex - 31995R2694 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31995R2694

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2694/95 of 21 November 1995 concerning the classification of certain goods in the combined nomenclature **

*
Official Journal L 280 , 23/11/1995 P. 0013 - 0014 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2694/95 of 21 November 1995 concerning the classification of certain goods in the combined nomenclature

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2588/95 (2), and in particular Article 9 thereof,

Whereas in order to ensure uniform application of the combined nomenclature annexed to the said Regulation, it is necessary to adopt measures concerning the classification of the goods referred to in the Annex to this Regulation;

Whereas Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 has set down the general rules for the interpretation of the combined nomenclature and those rules also apply to any other nomenclature which is wholly or partly based on it or which adds any additional subdivision to it and which is established by specific Community provisions, with a view to the application of tariff and other measures relating to trade in goods;

Whereas, pursuant to the said general rules, the goods described in column 1 of the table annexed to the present Regulation must be classified under the appropriate CN codes indicated in column 2, by virtue of the reasons set out in column 3;

Whereas it is accepted that binding tariff information issued by the customs authorities of Member States in respect of the classification of goods in the combined nomenclature and which do not conform to the rights established by this Regulation, can continue to be invoked, under the provisions in Article 12 (6) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (3), as amended by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 (4), for a period of three months by the holder;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Tariff and Statistical Nomenclature Section of the Customs Code Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The goods described in column 1 of the annexed table are now classified within the combined nomenclature under the appropriate CN codes indicated in column 2 of the said table.

Article 2

Binding tariff information issued by the customs authorities of Member States which do not conform to the rights established by this Regulation can continue to be invoked under the provisions of Article 12 (6) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 for a period of three months.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 21st day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 November 1995.

For the Commission Mario MONTI Member of the Commission

ANNEX

>TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4602 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4602

           To prohibit the obstruction of emergency vehicles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 16, 2020

 Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Mr. Tillis, Mrs. Blackburn, Ms. Ernst, Mr. 
Rounds, Mr. Cramer, and Mr. Rubio) introduced the following bill; which 
     was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To prohibit the obstruction of emergency vehicles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Blocking Hospitals Act''.

SEC. 2. OBSTRUCTION OF AN EMERGENCY VEHICLE.

    (a) Prohibition.--Chapter 2 of title 18, United States Code is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 40C. Obstruction of an emergency vehicle
    ``(a) Offense.--It shall be unlawful for any person, using a 
channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce 
or otherwise affecting interstate or foreign commerce, to knowingly 
obstruct, delay, or prevent--
            ``(1) any ambulance or emergency vehicle from responding to 
        a call or transporting an individual to a hospital;
            ``(2) any vehicle used by a fire department, or any officer 
        or member of a fire department, from responding to a call or 
        transporting an individual to a hospital; or
            ``(3) any vehicle used by a State or local law enforcement 
        agency, or any officer of the State or local law enforcement 
        agency, from responding to a call or transporting an individual 
        to a hospital.
    ``(b) Penalty.--Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be 
fined under this title, imprisoned not less than 1 year nor more than 5 
years, or both.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for 
chapter 2 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
after the item relating to section 40B the following:

``40C. Obstruction of an emergency vehicle.''.
                                 <all>
```