alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the National Advisory Council on Aging.

The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and/or contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications and/or contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                        National Advisory Council on Aging.                    

*Date:*                        February 9, 2000.                    

*Open:*                        8 a.m. to 11 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                        Call to Order; Review of NIA's Minority Aging Programs Report; Working Group on Program; and Review of the Intramural Program—Laboratory of Neuroscience.                        Start Printed Page 2972

*Place:*                        Natcher Building, Conference Room D, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Closed:*                        11 a.m. to 11:45 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                        To review and evaluate the Intrumural program.                    

*Place:*                        Natcher Building, Conference Room D, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Open:*                        12:45 p.m. to 2:45 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                        Discussion of Peer Review Issues and Program Highlights                    

*Place:*                        Natcher Building, Conference Room D, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Closed:*                        3 p.m. to Adjournment.                    

*Agenda:*                        To review and evaluate applications.                    

*Place:*                        Natcher Building, Conference Room D. 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892                    

*Contact Person:*                        Miriam F. Kelty, PHD, Director, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C218, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9322.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, (HHS)

Dated: January 11, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-1138 Filed 1-18-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### U n ite d S t a te s En vi r o n m e n t a l P r o tecti o n A g e n cy Re g i o nIX 75 H aw t h o r n e S treet S a n F r a n c i s c o, CA94105
- 3901 N ov embe r

30, 2011 Tran s m i tta l of EPA

Ru l e R ev i ew C omments
T o: J e ss i F i e rro, S an J oaqu i n V a ll e y A i r P o ll ut i on Cont ro l D i s t r i ct

j e ss i ca .f i e rro @ v a ll e y a i r .o rg M i k e G u zz etta, Ca li fo r n i a A i rRe s ou rc e s B oa rd mgu zz ett @ a r b. c a.gov From: A nd rew S te ck e l , Ru l ema k i ng O ff i c e Ch i ef

s te ck e l .and rew @ epa.gov R e: P opo s ed Ru l e 4352, S o li d F ue l F i red B o il e rs ( No v embe r15, 2011) W e a re p ro v i d i ng c omment s ba s ed on ou rp re li m i na ry re v i ew of the d r aft r u l e i dent i f i ed abo v e. P l ea s e d i re c t an yque s t i on s about ou r c omment s to me at ( 415 ) 947

- 4115 o rto Ida li a P e re zat ( 415 ) 972

- 3248.

1. T he D i s t r i c t s hou l d def i ne the te r m s i n the s i x- tenth s equat i on, u s ed fo rthe f i rs t t i me on page s e v en of the s taff repo rt. 2. T he D i s t r i c t s hou l d e x p l a i n wh y i t u s e s a 10 -y ea r li fe and a 10 % i nte re s t r ate to dete r m i ne the annua li z ed c ap i ta l c o s t s fo r ret rof i t equ i pment. 3. T he D i s t r i c t s hou l d c on s i de r i n c l ud i ng PM 2 .5and S Oxem i ss i on li m i t s i n the S I P i n re s pon s e to the 2006 PM 2 .5N AA Q S.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SunCoast Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, John S. Wilks, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                       
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ John S. Wilks                     
|                     |  |     |  | John S. Wilks, Chief Financial Officer
|                     |  |     |  | (Principal Financial Officer and      
|                     |  |     |  | Principal Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>






<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>                           
<RESTATED>
<CIK>                              0000797917
<NAME>                             RAYTECH CORP
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000
<CURRENCY>                         U.S. DOLLARS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                    1
   
<CASH>                             12,240
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      26,991
<ALLOWANCES>                       701
<INVENTORY>                        26,290
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   70,603
<PP&E>                             120,651
<DEPRECIATION>                     77,207
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     131,501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              70,819
<BONDS>                            0
<COMMON>                           5,364
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                         25,219 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       131,501
<SALES>                            165,839
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   165,839
<CGS>                              124,451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      124,451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 2,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    19,116 
<INCOME-TAX>                       5,276
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                13,037
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       13,037
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      3.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                      3.78



    

</TABLE>
§ 61.305 What are the age and language requirements for a sport pilot certificate? ( a ) To be eligible for a sport pilot certificate you must: ( 1 ) Be at least 17 years old (or 16 years old if you are applying to operate a glider or balloon).
( 2 ) Be able to read, speak, write, and understand English. If you cannot read, speak, write, and understand English because of medical reasons, the FAA may place limits on your certificate as are necessary for the safe operation of light-sport aircraft.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


     Each of the undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report of Columbus McKinnon  Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31,  2006,  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  and  that
information contained in the such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated:  June 29, 2006



                                                   /S/ TIMOTHY T. TEVENS
                                                   ---------------------
                                                   Timothy T. Tevens
                                                   Chief Executive Officer



                                                    /S/ KAREN L. HOWARD
                                                    -------------------
                                                    Karen L. Howard
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
#### § 91.507 Equipment requirements: Over-the-top or night VFR operations.

No person may operate an airplane over-the-top or at night under VFR unless that airplane is equipped with the instruments and equipment required for IFR operations under § 91.205(d) and one electric landing light for night operations. Each required instrument and item of equipment must be in operable condition.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.a.1

                          CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP

We consent to the use of our report dated October 31, 2002 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Amdocs
Limited included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended September
30, 2002 and incorporated by reference in the following registration statements:

                              COMMISSION FILE NO.

                            Form S-8, No. 333-91847
                            Form S-8, No. 333-92705
                            Form S-8, No. 333-31506
                            Form S-8, No. 333-34104
                            Form S-8, No. 333-58454
                Form F-3 (and related Prospectus), No. 333-39278
                Form F-3 (and related Prospectus), No. 333-44994
                Form F-3 (and related Prospectus), No. 333-57036
                Form F-3 (and related Prospectus), No. 333-67572

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 24, 2003
§ 25.1309 Equipment, systems, and installations. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 68735 , Aug. 27, 2024.
( a ) The equipment, systems, and installations whose functioning is required by this subchapter, must be designed to ensure that they perform their intended functions under any foreseeable operating condition.
( b ) The airplane systems and associated components, considered separately and in relation to other systems, must be designed so that— ( 1 ) The occurrence of any failure condition which would prevent the continued safe flight and landing of the airplane is extremely improbable, and
( 2 ) The occurrence of any other failure conditions which would reduce the capability of the airplane or the ability of the crew to cope with adverse operating conditions is improbable.
( c ) Warning information must be provided to alert the crew to unsafe system operating conditions, and to enable them to take appropriate corrective action. Systems, controls, and associated monitoring and warning means must be designed to minimize crew errors which could create additional hazards.
( d ) Compliance with the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section must be shown by analysis, and where necessary, by appropriate ground, flight, or simulator tests. The analysis must consider— ( 1 ) Possible modes of failure, including malfunctions and damage from external sources.
( 2 ) The probability of multiple failures and undetected failures.
( 3 ) The resulting effects on the airplane and occupants, considering the stage of flight and operating conditions, and
( 4 ) The crew warning cues, corrective action required, and the capability of detecting faults.
( e ) In showing compliance with paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section with regard to the electrical system and equipment design and installation, critical environmental conditions must be considered. For electrical generation, distribution, and utilization equipment required by or used in complying with this chapter, except equipment covered by Technical Standard Orders containing environmental test procedures, the ability to provide continuous, safe service under foreseeable environmental conditions may be shown by environmental tests, design analysis, or reference to previous comparable service experience on other aircraft.
( f ) EWIS must be assessed in accordance with the requirements of § 25.1709.
[Amdt. 25-23, 35 FR 5679, Apr. 8, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 25-38, 41 FR 55467, Dec. 20, 1976; Amdt. 25-41, 42 FR 36970, July 18, 1977; Amdt. 25-123, 72 FR 63405, Nov. 8, 2007]
# EUR-Lex - 31996D0389 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31996D0389

**96/389/EC: Commission Decision of 17 June 1996 approving the plan for the monitoring and control of salmonella in fowl presented by Ireland (Only the English text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 155 , 28/06/1996 P. 0060 - 0060 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 17 June 1996 approving the plan for the monitoring and control of salmonella in fowl presented by Ireland (Only the English text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (96/389/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 92/117/EEC of 17 December 1992 concerning measures for protection against specified zoonoses and specified zoonotic agents in animals and products of animal origin in order to prevent outbreaks of food-borne infections and intoxications (1), as amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 8 (3) thereof,

Whereas, in accordance with Article 8 (2) of Directive 92/117/EEC, Ireland forwarded, by letters dated 3 April and 24 May 1996, a plan for the monitoring and control of salmonella in fowl in Ireland;

Whereas the abovementioned plan satisfies the Community requirements on the subject, in particular those set out in Article 8 (2) of Directive 92/117/EEC, and must therefore be approved;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The plan for the monitoring and control of salmonella in fowl presented by Ireland is hereby approved.

Article 2

Ireland shall bring into force by 30 June 1996 the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement the plan referred to in Article 1.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to Ireland.

Done at Brussels, 17 June 1996.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 38.
§ 431.53 Classes of payloads. ( a ) The FAA may approve the return of a type or class of payload (for example, communications or microgravity/scientific satellites).
( b ) The RLV mission licensee that will return a payload approved for reentry under this section, is responsible for providing current information in accordance with § 431.57 regarding the payload proposed for reentry no later than 60 days before a scheduled RLV mission involving that payload.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Lawrence  A.  Consalvi,  Chief  Executive  Officer of Gateway  International
Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003, fully complies with the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C.  78m or 78o(d))  and that  information  contained  in this  Quarterly
Report on Form  10-QSB for the  fiscal  quarter  ended  March 31,  2003,  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of Gateway International Holdings, Inc.


By:    /s/ Lawrence A. Consalvi
       -----------------------------------------------
Name:  Lawrence A. Consalvi
Title: President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Date:  August 12, 2005

                                       58
#### § 249.30 Applicability.

This subpart is applicable to all air carriers and foreign air carriers as defined in 49 U.S.C. 40102, including, without limitation, direct carriers, air taxi operators registered under part 298 of this chapter, indirect air carriers registered under part 296 of this chapter, charter operators authorized under parts 372 and 380 of this chapter, and foreign air carriers holding permits to engage in indirect foreign air transportation issued under 49 U.S.C. 41302.

[ER-1214, 46 FR 25415, May 6, 1981, as amended at 60 FR 66726, Dec. 26, 1995]
§ 60.21 Interim qualification of FSTDs for new aircraft types or models. ( a ) A sponsor may apply for and the responsible Flight Standards office may issue an interim qualification level for an FSTD for a new type or model of aircraft, even though the aircraft manufacturer's aircraft data package is preliminary, if the sponsor provides the following to the satisfaction of the responsible Flight Standards office— ( 1 ) The aircraft manufacturer's data, which consists of at least predicted data, validated by a limited set of flight test data;
( 2 ) The aircraft manufacturer's description of the prediction methodology used to develop the predicted data; and
( 3 ) The QTG test results.
( b ) An FSTD that has been issued interim qualification is deemed to have been issued initial qualification unless the responsible Flight Standards office rescinds the qualification. Interim qualification terminates two years after its issuance, unless the responsible Flight Standards office determines that specific conditions warrant otherwise.
( c ) Within twelve months of the release of the final aircraft data package by the aircraft manufacturer, but no later than two years after the issuance of the interim qualification status, the sponsor must apply for initial qualification in accordance with § 60.15 based on the final aircraft data package approved by the aircraft manufacturer, unless the responsible Flight Standards office determines that specific conditions warrant otherwise.
( d ) An FSTD with interim qualification may be modified only in accordance with § 60.23.
[Docket No. FAA-2002-12461, 71 FR 63426, Oct. 30, 2006, as amended by Docket No. FAA-2022-1355, Amdt. No. 60-7, 87 FR 75711, Dec. 9, 2022]
Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MULTI-LINK TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2005, (the
"Report"), I, Kevin R. Keating, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.


Date:  July 29, 2005

                                               /s/ Kevin R. Keating
                                               --------------------
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               and Chief Financial Officer
#### FLOWER v FLOWER

Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Summit Co

No 1540,

Decided Dec 10, 1928

Jonathan Taylor, Akron, for Plaintiff.

J B Morris, Cuyahoga Falls, for Defendants.

Richards, Williams & Lloyd, JJ, of the 6th Dist sitting.

WILLIAMS, J

There is no question that where a valid and subsisting agreement is entered into by two parties to leave property to each other, and mutual wills are executed in pursuance thereof, and thereafter the contract is broken, by one of them after the death of the other, action will lie for such breach of contract, and in a proper case there may be specific performance of the contract, or a declaration of trust as against those who take legal title to the property in question.

> 40 Cyc., 2118 and cases cited; Brown vs. Johanson, 69 Col., 400; Frazier vs. Patterson, 243 Ill., 80.

The provisions of mutual wills and the surrounding circumstances may be such that a contract to make mutual wills must be conclusively inferred. Doyle vs. Fischer, 33 A. L. R., 733. The mere fact, however, that wills are executed concurrently, with full knowledge of their contents on the part of the testators, will not be. sufficient to imply such a contract.

> Edson vs. Parsons, 155 N. Y., 555, 50 N. E., 265; Coveney vs. Conlin, 20 App., District of Columbia, 363.

In the instant case there is nothing in the surrounding circumstances or in the wills themselves, from which such inference could be drawn. The record discloses only that alleged mutual wills were executed concurrently with full knowledge of their contents on the part of both testators.

A decree will be entered in favor of the defendants.

Richards and Lloyd, JJ, concur.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Shannon Bass, Appellant

No. 06

- 19

- 00058

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 124th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 44585

- B ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of thi s date, we find that the motion of the appellant to

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Shannon Bass, has adequately indicated h er inability to pay

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 3, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk